The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-20-2014 HEARING EXAMINER AGENDAi A TY OF BURN WASHINGTON City Council Chambers 25 West Main Street Case No: VAR14 -0004 HEARING EXAMINER August 20, 2014 5:30 p.m. Applicant: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. on behalf of Verizon Wireless Request: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section 18.70.020.A.3 to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq ft each) and ancillary equipment at 88 foot level of existing tower on a site zoned R5, Residential. The Special Exception is required since the use is non - conforming. Project Location: 5800 block of Panorama Drive SE. The site is within the NE quarter, of the NW quarter of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Assessor's Parcel No. 0520062013. Case No: MIS14 -0007 Applicant: Erin Reibman Request: Special Home Occupation Project Location: 5614 Bennett Avenue SE, Auburn, WA, Parcel No. 7299600140 Case No: Police Incident Report 14 -06758 Applicant: Athena Fisher Request: Appeal of Potentially Dangerous Dog Designation Exhibit 1 ACITYOF DBuRN WASHINGTON SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Verizon Wireless File # VAR14 -0004 I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Application Date: March 28, 2014, Revised July 1, 2014 Applicant/Agent: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. on behalf of Verizon Wireless 1215 4th Avenue, Suite 1900 Seattle, WA 98161 Property Owner: Richard Rossi, Vice President Legal American Tower Management, LLC 10 Presidential Way Woburn, MA 01801 Project Description: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section 18.70.020.A.3 to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq ft each) and ancillary equipment at 88 foot level of existing tower on a site zoned R5, Residential. The Special Exception is required since the facility is non- conforming to use regulations of the zone. Proposed Location: 5800 block of Panorama Drive SE, Auburn WA 98001 The site is within the NE quarter, of the NW quarter of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Parcel Number: Pierce Co. Assessor's Parcel #0520062013. ,AU,BUP,N* MOPE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non-Conforming Date: August 12, 2014 Use, Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14-0004 V \\\C\� ��_ .._v,u.. .�. i.�i1'...: .��.:;Dnni� .q:Hr.:c . iDr.re� n]'vF� m .� 1r�Jldzr. I �_ Pocm�al.�lnuesanun.�lrtas � JUCDo«mo��.nCNaoCrnrcr �PIPuI+hcU:eD�smct Res�drnr.alCouur:mq: l�a�c Feartv<s i EPEv�vov�imal Put D�smc� +PI10 PUmcd[;w�De��eloy�cev�i FN]HC Re,�,ienrial ALauu6cnued Mab�le Home Uwis CI Leh�Cuumurui Uztrict I Ivs�mwwal Use Damci RI Readmal l�C.AUe �RO Rn�ae�eal Offia p�ma +C_Can9 Buswns D�srw�r LakelmE Hil�SoNh PUD R Revtlmul i Dl.':�c�e +RO-H Residemul UHrte Duo-�n Mosprtaq iCifieatM1�Cww�ernalAsmtt :FAvponLwamqEaldAsmtt R?RevEmtu170[;Aae +7V7eaacellm' +CJlfactlUseCammeraial R11Li�ilnM�arulDim�n +RIORn�dmna1100C.Aa< L'1:CUvclazsSmaCU6,sfiu .�� Page 2 of 17 Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 II. SEPA STATUS: The project is exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements under WAC 197 -11- 800(25) applicable to Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF). This provision allows the collocation of new equipment, removal of equipment, or replacement of existing equipment on existing or replacement structures that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such structures; III. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Comprehensive Plan designations, zoning designations and existing land uses of the subject site and surrounding properties are: 2. On March 28, 2014, Madeline Chaney of Odelia Pacific Corporation on behalf of Verizon Wireless, and on behalf of Richard Rossi, Vice President Legal of American Tower Management, LLC, Property owner, applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming use. The Application was revised on July 1, 2014. More specifically, the proposal is to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq ft each and 18.9 sq. ft., cumulatively) and ancillary equipment at the 88 -foot level of existing tower on a site that is zoned R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units per Acre). 3. As indicated by Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corporation, the Applicant's representative, in the letter revised June 18, 2014; the project is: to allow the addition of 3 Verizon Wireless panel antennas, along with ancillary radio hardware (remote radio units (RRUs), tower mounted amplifiers (TMAs) and a new hybrid fiber cable) at the 88 foot level of the existing tower. Comprehensive Plan Zoning classification Current Land Use designation Single Family Residential R5, Residential, Five Wireless Communication Project Dwelling Units per Acre Facility (WCF) Site Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development North PUD Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development and forested hillside South (PUD) Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences and Public & Quasi - Public Unit Development and municipal water West (PUD) storage facility Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development East (PUD) 2. On March 28, 2014, Madeline Chaney of Odelia Pacific Corporation on behalf of Verizon Wireless, and on behalf of Richard Rossi, Vice President Legal of American Tower Management, LLC, Property owner, applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming use. The Application was revised on July 1, 2014. More specifically, the proposal is to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq ft each and 18.9 sq. ft., cumulatively) and ancillary equipment at the 88 -foot level of existing tower on a site that is zoned R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units per Acre). 3. As indicated by Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corporation, the Applicant's representative, in the letter revised June 18, 2014; the project is: to allow the addition of 3 Verizon Wireless panel antennas, along with ancillary radio hardware (remote radio units (RRUs), tower mounted amplifiers (TMAs) and a new hybrid fiber cable) at the 88 foot level of the existing tower. Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 The three antennas that would be added with this modification ach have a surface area of 75 inches x 12.1 inches (6.3 square feet). The proposed ancillary radio units would be placed behind the antennas so that they would not be visible. With three antennas added to the tower, the additional surface area added would be 18.9 square feet (6.3'x 3). There would be no change to the footprint of Verizon Wireless' existing ground- mounted structures at the site. The surface area of the existing tower, if facing one side of the self support structure, would be approximately 1071 (sic) square feet (by computing the area of a roughly triangular structure 18' at the base x 119' tall —(18' x 119) 12 = 1071 square feet). The additional visible surface area of 6.3 square added to one "face" of the tower by adding an antenna then, would be approximately .0588 percent. The cumulative area of expansion, when adding the recent AT &T expansion and the proposed Verizon Wireless expansion would be 20.2588% expansion of the tower and a 20.9% expansion of the ground equipment area." 4. The Special Exception is required since the facility is non - conforming to use regulations of the zone. The land use approval of a Special Exception is required for this proposal because the zoning designation of the subject property is R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units per Acre) and the existing wireless communication facility (WCF) is nonconforming to the current use regulations of this zone. It is non - conforming because wireless communication facilities are not allowed in this Residential zoning district with the exception of Type 1 -D wireless communication facilities per ACC 18.31.100.K (Type 1- D, WCF are antenna located on existing water towers, athletic field light poles, or similar public utility infrastructure not located within public street right -of -way). The current use is as privately -owned site and tower for radio and wireless communication facilities. 5. Per Auburn City Code (ACC) 18.04.912, the city defines the following types of WCF: "18.04.912 Wireless communications TYPE 1. Type 1 are new antennas erected on existing buildings or nonresidential structures. There are four separate Type 1 categories described as follows: 1 -A. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building cannot be 25 percent greater than the existing building or exceed the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. 1 -B. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building cannot be 50 percent greater than the existing building or exceed the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. 1 -C. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building is 50 percent greater than the existing building or exceeds the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. The height limitation of the zone can only be exceeded by 25 percent. 1 -D. Antenna located on existing water towers, athletic field light poles, or similar public utility infrastructure not located within public street right -of -way. The height limitation of the WCF will be 10 percent of the existing structure height, but may be increased to a maximum of 20 percent with an administrative use permit and may be increased to a maximum of 30 percent with a conditional use permit. The height limitation of the zone may be exceeded relative to the above provisions allowed for a 1 -D facility. �lx, Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 TYPE 2. Type 2 are new antennas erected on existing (primary) support structures that have previous city approvals. There are two separate Type 2 categories described as follows: 2 -A. Must meet height requirements of previous approval and is limited to 50 percent total (cumulative) expansion of equipment area. 2 -13. Has greater height requirements than previous approval and allows for more than a 50 percent expansion of the equipment area. TYPE 3. Type 3 is the erection of new (primary) support structures. There are two separate Type 3 categories described as follows: 3 -A. Monopoles that are 75 feet or less in height. 3 -13. Monopoles that are more than 75 feet in height or lattice towers of any height. " 6. Per Auburn City Code (ACC) 18.31.100.K the City defines the following types of WCF and the zoning district in which they are allowed: �,,, Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 "K. Zones in Which WCF Are Permitted. The following table illustrates which zones the types of facilities as defined by ACC 18.04.912(J) are allowed in and which permits are required. Microcells, as defined by ACC 18.04.912(G), are allowed only in residential zones and shall be permitted outright pursuant to the provisions of ACC 18.04.912(G). 1. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 20 percent of the supporting structure. 2. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 30 percent of the supporting structure. 3. The maximum height allowed, including antennas, is 45 feet." 7. A non - conforming structure or use may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section and 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the �,,, Type of Permit Required Zone Permitted Outright Administrative Use Permit Conditional Use Permit All Zones 1 -D 1 -D' 1 -D2 RO -H 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C C -N 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C C -1 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C C -2, DUC 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C C -3 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -13, 3 -A 3 -13 M -1, EP 1 -13 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -13, 3 -A 3 -13 M -2 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -13, 3 -A 3 -13 P -1 1-13, 2-A 1 -C,2 -13 3 -A3 1 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C LF 1 -A 1 -13 1 -C 1. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 20 percent of the supporting structure. 2. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 30 percent of the supporting structure. 3. The maximum height allowed, including antennas, is 45 feet." 7. A non - conforming structure or use may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section and 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the �,,, Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage." A similar code provision is found within the zoning code chapter related to regulation of nonconforming uses and structures at Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.54.060. H: "18.54.060 Maintenance, damage repairs and restorations, additions, enlargements, moving or relocation of nonconforming structures, and residential structures. H. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted by means of a special exception issued by the hearing examiner pursuant to ACC 18.70.020 to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of the ordinance codified in this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage." 8. This request for the Special Exception has been reviewed with the Planning Director. The Planning Director in reviewing the zoning code determined that the special exception process in ACC 18.70.020A (3) is the appropriate process for this proposal. The Director determined a variance is not appropriate because the city's zoning code provides a more specific process for expansion of nonconforming structures and uses. ACC 18.56.060H (Nonconforming Structures and Uses) allows expansion up to 25% under the Special Use Exception. ACC 18.70.020A(3), provides that non - residential use which becomes non - conforming "after the effective date of this ordinance" may be permitted to expand up to 25% of the use or structure existing at this time. 9. The 0.95 -acre site is located on the north side of the public street of Panorama Drive SE, between Francis Court SE and Hazel Court SE. The character of the vicinity is predominantly a residential neighborhood. There are some nearby areas containing a municipal water tank and open space as forested steep hillsides. 10. The 0.95 -acre (41,340 square foot) site is located near a high point in elevation of the vicinity. The site occurs at an elevation of 574 above sea level and the single family residential properties developed to the east are approximately 25 feet lower in ground surface elevation. The municipal water supply facility located to the northwest is at a �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 slightly higher elevation of 576 feet. The wireless communication facilities are located in the central portion of the site surrounded by mature, native vegetation that has historically been retained. The native vegetation consists of mature Douglas fir trees, Black Cottonwood trees, and understory vegetation. 11. The existing WCF consist of an approximately 99 -foot high, three -sided lattice -type tower with an approximately 2,680 square foot equipment area defined by a 6 -foot high galvanized chain link fence with razor wire at the top. Located within the fenced yard and north of the tower are two, single -story equipment buildings, one with an attached minor storage shed. The yard also contains a separate pad containing an emergency power generator. Vehicle access to the WCF is provided by a gravel driveway to the Panorama Drive SE, secured by a locked metal post gate. There has been a recent land use approval (File No. VAR14- 0003), a Special Exception, to increase the height of the existing approximately 99 -foot high Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) tower by 20 feet (a 20.2% increase), add new antennas, and construct a 230 square foot associated equipment shelter surrounded by an extension of the existing fence. However, the building permits have not yet been applied for and issued, so the WCF has not yet been modified. (See further explanation, below.) The current Special Exception application has been evaluated as if these expansions previously authorized have been completed. The current Special Exception application considers the cumulative increases. 12. This property has been the subject of two previous requests for Special Exception to expand a non - conforming use as follows: A. First, on June 23, 2009 the City received an application (City File # MIS09 -0008) for a Special Exception from Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless, a new carrier at this location, for the site preparation and installation of nine (9) panel antennas to an existing non - conforming tower on a site zoned R5, Residential in order to accommodate a new wireless communication provider. Additional improvements proposed as part of this proposal included an equipment shelter and backup emergency power generator within an existing lease area, with no change in the fenced lease area. On September 9, 2009, a public hearing was held by the City's Hearing Examiner on the Special Exception Application to expand an existing non - conforming use under the process identified in ACC 18.70.020, "Special Exceptions ". No one other than staff and the Applicant testified. On September 21, 2009, the Hearing Examiner issued a written decision approving the request (City File # MIS09 -0008) without conditions. There were no requests for reconsideration or appeals of this decision. Building (alteration) permits were subsequently issued (File # ALT09 -0305) on January 29, 2010 and the project constructed. B. Second on January 30, 2014, George Pierce of Ryka Consulting on behalf of Branson Olsen of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility, Applicant, Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 and on behalf of Margaret Robinson, Senior Counsel of American Tower Management, LLC, Property owner, applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming use. More specifically, the application increases the height of the existing approx. 99 -foot high wireless communication facility (WCF) tower by 20 feet (20.2 %), add twelve new antennas, four per sector on boom gates, construct an approximately 230 square foot associated equipment shelter surrounded by an extension of the existing fence on a site zoned R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units Per Acre). On April 16, 2014, a public hearing was held by the City's Hearing Examiner on the Special Exception Application to expand an existing non - conforming use under the process identified in ACC 18.70.020, "Special Exceptions ". A nearby neighbor, Mr. Jae Huh, 609 59th Court SE, provided written materials and spoke in opposition to the proposal at the hearing. His objections related to aesthetics, safety, and code compliance issues. On April 29, 2014, the Hearing Examiner issued a written decision approving the request (City File # VAR14 -0003) with five conditions. There were no requests for reconsideration or appeals of this decision. Building (addition) permit applications have yet to be submitted to the City and issued for the project. To address cumulative changes, the current proposal and project plans (Exhibit #2) depict the WCF as if the tower height increase and yard expansion addition have been completed although they have not been completed. 13. The Application materials from this prior application indicate as well as the "Findings of Fact" from the previous hearing examiner decision (File # MIS09 -0008) indicate: "The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998, and the original lattice tower was approved by Pierce County in a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. " The Application materials from the current application indicate: "As noted previously, the subject tower was developed as a microwave relay tower in 1965 when the parcel was under the jurisdiction of Pierce County. The development surrounding the site has occurred in recent years." 14. As indicated by Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corporation, the Applicant's representative, in the letter revised June 18, 2014; the project is needed to provide Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) capabilities to the surrounding area. "AWS allows better data throughput for streaming content and will enhance Verizon Wireless coverage and capability to the surrounding area." 15. As the proposal is related to a wireless communication provider that already exists at the tower and site and uses the same ground equipment, alternative locations for the antennas were not evaluated. �,,, Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 16. The property has had the Comprehensive Plan Designation of "Single Family Residential' and the zoning of the property was originally `R1, Residential (8,000 square foot minimum lot size)' at the time of the property annexation to the City. The R1 zoning category was subsequently changed to R5, Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) by Ordinance # 6245 in June of 2009. 17. The property is currently zoned R5, Residential (Five dwelling units per acre). The stated purpose of the R5 district as stated at ACC 18.07.010 is to: "18.07.010 Intent (of the R5 zoning district). The R -5 single - family residential zones are intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of four to five dwelling units per net acre. This zone will provide for the development of single - family detached dwellings and for such accessory uses as are related, incidental and not detrimental to the single - family residential environment. 18. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan designates this site as "Single Family Residential" The City's Comprehensive Plan describes the purpose of this designation as follows: "Single Family Purpose: To designate and protect areas for predominantly single family dwellings. Description: This category includes those areas reserved primarily for single family dwellings. Implementing regulations should provide for an appropriate range of lot sizes, clustered and mixed housing types as part of a planned development. Compatible Uses: Single family residences and uses that serve or support residential development, such as schools, daycare centers, churches and parks shall be considered appropriate and may be permitted on a conditional basis. Other public buildings and semi - public uses may be permitted if designed and laid out in a manner which enhances rather than detracts from the residential character of the area. In siting such uses, however, special care shall be given to ensuring adequate parking, landscaping, and traffic circulation with a minimum of conflict with residential uses. Uses which generate significant traffic (such as large churches) should only locate on developed arterials in areas zoned for institutional uses. Intrusion of industrial uses into any of these single family areas shall be prohibited. Only very limited commercial uses such as home occupations or strictly limited appropriate conditional uses can be allowed. Planned developments should be favorably considered in these designations in order to allow optimal flexibility. In providing such flexibility, the emphasis should be on small alley - loaded lot single family �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 development, limited low density multifamily housing and a mixture of types, and design diversity should be sought. Except where conditional use permits have been previously granted, alternate structure types should not exceed more than 40 percent of the units, and alternative structures should in most cases contain no more than four dwelling units each. However, where substantial offsetting community benefits can be identified, such alternative structures may be allowed to contain more than three units each. Criteria for Designation: Areas suitable for this designation include those areas designated in goals and policies of this Plan as single family areas. Consistent with those policies, areas within the Community Serving Area of the City suitable for this category should be reserved for these uses. This designation should also be applied to areas adjacent to lower density residential plan designations. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the City to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code, decisions on development regulations, and to guide site - specific land use decisions -- all of which must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 19. The project is exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements under WAC 197 -11- 800(25) applicable to Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) which allows the collocation of new equipment, removal of equipment, or replacement of existing equipment on existing or replacement structures that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such structures. The project site was the subject of a previous recent SEPA decision for a different proposal related to a twenty -foot increase in tower height by another company. An addendum to the previous Final Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) File # SEP09- 0020 was issued on March 31, 2014. 20. Staff conducted a site visit on August 12, 2014 to verify the proposal and surroundings. 21. A Notice of Application (NOA) and notice of the hearing was posting on the site, mailed to properties within 300 feet and published in the newspaper on or before August 4, 2014 in accordance with ACC 14.07.040 "Methods of providing notice ". 22. The application was received on March 28, 2014 and revised on July 1, 2014. The Application was determined complete on July 14, 2014. A decision on the proposal is expected to be issued within the 120 -day timeframe of ACC 14.11.010, `Time limits'. CONCLUSIONS: ACC Section 18.70.020.13 provides criteria for Special Exceptions: A. Consideration shall be given to the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures prior to authorizing; �,., Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 Staff Analysis: The subject property is surrounded by single family residences except to the northwest which contains a municipal water storage facility (vertical water tank) constructed in 2011. The public right -of -way of Panorama Drive SE borders the site to the south. All of the surrounding properties are zoned Lakeland Hills Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site is an island of the R5, Residential zoning designation different from its surroundings resulting from the ownership pattern existing at the time of annexation to the City in 1998 (Ordinance # 5089). The proposed addition of three antennas and ancillary equipment at the 88 -foot level of the existing tower is proposed to provide increased wireless communication service to the surrounding community. With the advancements of technology in wireless communications, the project responds to an increased need for data transmission capabilities to homes and automobiles in the Lakeland Hills neighborhood and vicinity to meet the voice and data needs of Verizon customers. The proposed antennas would be most visible from the adjacent residences and streets, including Panorama Drive SE. However, the existing on -site 77' to 87' tall trees assist in partially obscuring views of the tower. The ground -level equipment shelter and generator are more effectively screened by the existing vegetation. Granting this Special Exception to allow the antennae and associated support equipment installation is not anticipated to change the existing character of the facility and will not materially change the developed nature from the current conditions. The proposal is not anticipated to create any significant impact to the surrounding area and is consistent with the developed character of the current use. B. That the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; Staff Analysis: The proposed expansion will be subject to all applicable City codes, building codes and regulations. The current request for a special exception does not exceed 25 percent; the maximum expansion allowed by the special exception process (ACC 18.70.020.A). This property has been the subject of two previous requests for Special Exceptions to expand a non- conforming use as follows: The 2009 proposal by Verizon Wireless (MIS09 -0008) included the installation of nine (9) panel antennas to an existing non - conforming tower to accommodate the new wireless communication provider. Additional improvements proposed as part of this proposal included an equipment shelter and backup emergency power generator within an existing lease area, without a change in the fenced lease area. The surface area of the existing 99- foot tower, if facing one side of the self supporting structure, would be approximately 891 square feet (by computing the area of a roughly triangular structure 18' at the base x 99' tall —(18' x 99') / 2 = 891 square feet). The additional visible surface area of the nine antennas represented less than a one percent increase. (See staff report Exhibit 1013) �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 The 2014 proposal by AT &T (VAR14 -0003) represents less than a 20.2% percent increase in height to the tower (Change from 98' -11" to 118' -11" feet). The existing WCF consist of a tower and equipment areas within an approximately 2,680 square foot equipment area defined by a 6 -foot high chain link fence. The proposed expansion of the equipment area measures approximately 16 feet by 35 feet or a fenced 560- square -foot expansion area. This represents an approximately 20.9 percent increase of the equipment yard area. The current, 2014 proposal by Verizon Wireless (VAR14 -0004) is computed similarly to earlier proposal by Verizon. The surface area of the existing tower, if facing one side of the self supporting structure, would be approximately 1,071 square feet (by computing the area of a roughly triangular structure 18' at the base x 119' tall —(18' x 119') / 2 = 1,071 square feet). The additional visible surface area of 6.3 square foot added to one "face" of the tower by adding an antenna then, would be approximately 0.0588 percent. The cumulative area of expansion, when adding the original Verizon, recent AT &T expansion, and the proposed Verizon Wireless expansion would be 21.2588% expansion of the tower area and a 20.9% expansion of the ground equipment area." The Application for expansion was reviewed by various City Divisions and the Valley Regional Fire Authority (VRFA). The City Building Division noted that a structural evaluation will be necessary associated with a building permit to demonstrate that the tower and its foundation is sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new and existing antennas. This would also apply to any other equipment attached to the tower. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Utilities Division, however the proposed WCF addition will not require use of, or increase demand for public utilities. The proposed tower addition would be most visible from the adjacent residences and from Panorama Drive SE. However, the existing on -site 77' to 87' tall trees assist in partially obscuring views of the tower. The ground level equipment shelter and generator are more effectively screened by the existing vegetation. Using existing vegetation to provide the required visual landscape screening of ground equipment is allowed by city code. A condition of approval associated with the previous proposal for increasing the tower height (File # VAR14 -0003) will provide for supplemental native plantings on the south side to ensure continued visual screening of ground level equipment with the proposed reduction in landscape buffer. As indicated by Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corporation, the Applicant's representative, in the letter revised June 18, 2014; the antennas and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the existing tower design and colors. To reduce or avoid visual impacts to the extent possible, a condition of approval is proposed to provide a color or material samples to ensure that not only the tower extension, but the equipment attached to the tower is manufactured in a color or coated in a color, such as paint, to be as similar as possible to the existing galvanized metal color of the tower (gray). The proposal is not anticipated to be injurious to public health. A building permit will be required to demonstrate that the tower and its foundation is sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new and existing antennas. Also, Federal Law expressly precludes local jurisdictions from regulating wireless communication facilities on the basis of health impacts. The Supremacy Clause of the federal constitution (Art. VI) provides that federal law supersedes state law. �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 There is a provision in the Telecommunication Act of 1996 that applies to local regulation of radiation levels, specifically 47 USC 332(c)(7), which provides as follows: (7) Preservation of local zoning authority (A) General authority. Except as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this Act shall limit or affect the authority of a State or local government or instrumentality thereof over decision of personal wireless service facilities (8) Limitations. (iv) No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission's regulations concerning such emissions. The provision above precludes the consideration of health and environmental impacts of "personal wireless service facilities" 47 USC 332 (c)(7)(C)(i) defines "personal wireless services " as "commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services." Therefore health and environmental impacts were not considered. The site is monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week by a national operations center to insure normal operations. With the conditions proposed, the special exception, if granted will not significantly alter the character of the neighborhood or be detrimental to surrounding properties in which the property is located. C. The authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of the zoning code. Staff Analysis: The stated purpose of the zoning code is to: "18.02.030 Purpose. A. The purpose of this title is to implement the city's comprehensive plan. This title will be used to further the growth and development of the city consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and it's implementing elements. This title will also further the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the city's population and to prevent and abate public nuisances. B. The specific zones and regulations set out in this title are designed to: 1. Provide adequate public facilities and services, including utilities, roads, schools, and parks in conjunction with development; 2. Provide housing with essential light, air, privacy, and open space; 3. Facilitate the safe and efficient movement of traffic on the city's streets; 4. Stabilize and enhance property values; �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 5. Facilitate adequate provisions for doing public and private business and thereby safeguard the community's economic structure upon which the prosperity and welfare of all depends; and 6. Through such achievements, help ensure the safety and security of home life, foster good citizenship, and create and preserve a more healthful, serviceable and attractive municipality and environment in which to live." The Special Exception, if approved would be consistent with the growth and development purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and assist in promoting private enterprise for community economic vitality. Specifically, the intent of the Special Exception provision in the zoning code is to allow the Hearing Examiner to approve limited expansions of existing non - conforming uses and development. The Applicant is proposing to add antennas to increase the efficiency and capacity of their communication services. The proposed addition is less than the maximum increase of 25 percent that could be authorized. Staff believes it is reasonable to allow the expansion of the non - conforming structure to accommodate an incremental upgrade to the facility. D. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized administrative use permit, conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage. Staff Analysis: The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998, and the original lattice tower is believed to have been approved by Pierce County by a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. Since no previous administrative use or conditional use permit is known to exist, the expansion if approved is not known to violate any previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement. Also, the proposal so does not propose any expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage, which is prohibited. Staff finds the request meets the criterion, as conditioned. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the application materials presented and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the staff report, Staff recommends that the Special Exception, File # VAR14 -0004 be approved with the following five conditions: VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans for the proposed addition of antennas and associated equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee to ensure consistency with the application materials and decision on the Special Exception approved by the Hearing Examiner. �T Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 2. A structural evaluation is required for City review prior to authorization of the building permit to add antennas and tower mounted equipment. A licensed design professional shall perform an analysis to determine the structural integrity of the tower, the number of new and existing antennas on the existing tower and all other additions. The analysis shall determine that the tower and its foundation shall be sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new and existing antennas. This also applies to any other equipment attached to the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved with the building permit. 3. Compatible color is required of the tower mounted equipment. To reduce or avoid aesthetic impacts and comply with ACC 18.31.100. F, `Aesthetics', at the time of building permit application, the Applicant shall provide color or material samples or other methods (such as photographic simulations, etc.) to ensure that antennas and other equipment attached to the tower is manufactured in a color or coated in a color, (such as paint) as similar as possible, to the existing galvanized metal (gray) color of the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee. VII. EXHIBIT LIST: Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Special Exception Application Form & Materials: 2A Completed Application Form & Letter of Authorization 2B Request for Special Exception Narrative, Revised June 18, 2014. 2C Verizon TAC- Lakeland 5811 Panorama Dr SE, Project Plans, Sheets T1.0, SP -1, A -1 through A -4 & E -1. Camp & Associates, June 30, 2014. 2D Non - Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis & Engineering Certification, TAC - Lakeland, BJ. Thomas PE, March 26, 2014. Exhibit 3 2012 Aerial photo of the site and vicinity Exhibit 4 City Zoning Map Exhibit 5 City Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 6 Notice of Application /Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 7 Affidavit of Publication Exhibit 8 Affidavit of Mailing Exhibit 9 Affidavit of Posting Exhibit 10 Previous Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon: 10A Hearing Examiner decision on Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon 10B Staff Report on Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon 10C Project Description on Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon 1 OD Plans on Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon Exhibit 11 Previous Special Exception, File #VAR14 -0004, AT &T PCS LLC: 11A Hearing Examiner decision on Special Exception, File #VAR14- 0004, AT &T PCS LLC 11 B Staff Report on Special Exception, File #VAR14 -0004, AT &T PCS LLC 11C Project Description on Special Exception, File #VAR14 -0004, AT &T � txT�iymffw Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: August 12, 2014 Use. Verizon Wireless - File No. VAR14 -0004 PCS LLC 11 D Plans on Special Exception, File #VAR14 -0004, AT &T PCS LLC Exhibit 12 Copy of screen shot of Pierce County historical permit record for tower Staff reserves the right to supplement the record of the case to respond to matters and information raised subsequent to the writing of this report. �T Exhibit 2 MYOF CITY OF AUBURN A07J, Planning & Development Department Auburn City Hall Annex, 2 "d Floor WASHINGT N I East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001-4998 Tel: 253.931 .3090 Fax: 253.804.3114 Perm itcenteraa u burnwa.q, ov www.auburnwa.gov Q-FFICE USE ONLY V A FIN 4 = 0 4 t: FEES PAID: CHECK/CASH: SUBMITTAL DATE: LAND USE DESIGNATION: � I � � °`' , r 11 � � ' �' �� SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION "T"' APPLICANT. )(Use mailing address for meeting notification. 1XCheck box if Primary Contact COMPANY: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp., obo Verizon Wireless ADDRESS: 1215 4th Ave, Suite 1900 (CITY, STATE, ZIP) Seattle WA 98161 PHONE: 425-346-0128 FAX: 206-490-3839 E-MAIL mchaney@odelia.com SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: Madeline Chaney (Signature Required) APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY: ADDRESS: (CITY, STATE, ZIP) PHONE: FAX: E-MAIL: SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: (Signature Required) ❑ Check box if Primary Contact PROPERTY OWNER(S): I Attach separate sheet if needed. ❑ Check box if Primary Contact COMPANY: American Tower Management, LLC ADDRESS: 10 Presidential Way (CITY, STATE, ZIP) Woburn, MA 01801 PHONE: FAX: E-MAIL SIGNATURE: See attached PRINTED NAME: (Signature Required) Note: Applicant or representative must have property owner's consent to Me this application form in order for it to be accepted PROPERTY INFORMATION (REQUIRED) SITE ADDRESS: 5811 Panorama Drive SE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ID# LOT SIZE ZONING DISTRICT 0520062013 .95 A R-5 AREA TO DEVELOPED (s.f.): add 3 antennas (tower only) EXISTING USE OF SITE: existing non-conforming wireless communication facility PROPOSED USE OF SITE: add 3 antennas to existing 9 antenna array (for a total of 12) for Verizon Wireless. VZW site ref TAC Lakeland American Tower Corp. site #89523 erryOF . *�.es� "'* * CITY OF AUBURN VWASHINGTNON Department of Planning & Development Auburn City Hall Annex, 2 "d Floor 1 East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 -4998 Tel: 253.931.3090 Fax: 253.804.3114 Perm itcenter(a)a uburnwa.00v www.auburnwa.pov SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION SPECIAL EXCEPTION - LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM PROPERTY OWNER GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TO ACT (A copy of this letter must be submitted for each property owner involved) I, American Tower Management LLC declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington as follows; 1. 1 am the owner of the property that is the subject of the application. 2. 1 [ ] have not appointed anyone, or [ have appointed Verizon Wireless and authorized agent Odelia Pacific to act as my agent regarding this application. 3. All statements, answers, and information submitted with this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 4. 1 agree to hold the City of Auburn harmless as to any claim (including costs, expenses and attorney's fees incurred in the investigation of such claim) which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and filed against the City of Auburn, but only where such claim arises out of the reliance of the City, including its officers and employees, upon the accuracy of the information provided to the City as part of this application. 5. 1 hereby grant permission for representatives of the City of Auburn and any other Federal, State, or local unit of government with regulatory authority over the project to enter onto my property to inspect the property, take photographs, and post public notices as required in connection with review of this application and for compliance with the terms and conditions of permits and approvals isued for the project. Signatyrfe LVVe .. .P"rIeSidant Legal Printed N e Date 10 Presidential Way Woburn, MA 01801 Address Woburn, MA City and State where signed SUSANiA RP18EIR0 * Notary I "ur�41c Commonwoohh of McJS,=husetts My ComMsslon r Ires March 16, 201 4 Pncinc conroRnnoN March 26, 2014 Revised June 18, 20114 City of Auburn Planning & Development Department Auburn City Hall Amiex, 2nd Floor East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 -4998 Re: Request for approval of Special Exception to allow addition of 3 antemlas on existing Wireless Communication facility at 5811 Panorama Drive SE (APN 0520062013) Verizon Wireless site reference "TAC Lakeland" Dear Reviewing Parties; This letter, along with other required submittal materials, is being submitted for approval of a Special Exception. In this case, the requested Special Exception is to allow the expansion of a legal nonconforming structure by less than 1 percent, in accordance with ACC 18.70.020 (A)(3): A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure may expand the existing use or structure up to 25% of the use or structure, provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city; This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized administrative use permit, conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage. Background The subject site, an existing wireless communication tower located at 5811 Panorama Drive SE (APN 0520062013), had been constructed in 1965 while the subject property,,,,,,. was under the jurisdiction of Pierce County. MIS 09 -0008 was approved by the City'q, Auburn Hearing Examiner on September 21, 2009 to allow the installation of �, iirie'�? Verizon Wireless antennas, an 8' x 16' equipment shelter, and exterior gend)`ata'x, `all Odelia Pacific Corporation o' , 1215 Fourth Ave Suite 1900 Seattle WA 98161 within an existing 3300 square foot fenced area. As noted in the Hearing Examiner's decision at that time, the subject property is on a slight plateau and the tower site is surrounded by a mix of mature vegetation that effectively screens the wireless tower from surrounding residential areas. And as demonstrated in that application, the proposed Verizon Wireless antenna installation was in conformity with all applicable regulations of the City's Wireless Code, ACC 18.48. 100 (now codified as 18.31.100). A second expansion of the existing tower was approve(] for the installation of AT&T antennas. This expansion was permitted through VAR]] -0003, which was approved by the Auburn Hearing Examiner in April 2014. That expansion consisted of tine addition of a 20' extension to the tower (a 20.2% increase), and a 560 square loot expansion of the ground equipment area (20.9 % increase) of the existing use. Proposed modification This request for special exception is being made in order to allow the addition of 3 Verizon Wireless panel antennas, along with ancillary radio hardware (remote radio units (RRUs), tower mounted amplifiers (TMAs) and a new hybrid fiber cable) at the 88 foot level of the existing tower. The three antennas that would be added with this modification each have a surface area of 75 inches x 12.1 inches (6.3 square feet). The proposed ancillary radio units would be placed behind the antennas so that they would not be visible. With three antennas added to the tower, the additional surface area added would be 18.9 square feet (6.3' x 3). There would be no change to the footprint of Verizon Wireless' existing ground- mounted structures at the site. The surface area of the existing tower, if facing one side of the self support structure, would be approximately 873 square feet (by computing the area of a roughly triangular structure 18' at the base x 119' tall — (18 x 119')= 2= 1071 square fee(). The additional visible surface area of 6.3 square Bet added to one "face" of the tower by adding an antenna then, would be approximately .0588 percent. Tire cumulative area of expansion, when adding the recent AT&T expansion and the proposed Verizon Wireless expansion, would be 20.2588'®/ expansion of the tower and a 20.9 % expansion of the ground equuipnnent area. Conformity with Special Exception Review Criteria Per ACC 18.70.020B, in reviewing applications for special exceptions, the Hearing Examiner will consider: 1. The nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures Response The subject property contains approximately 0.9.5 acre, and is zoned R -5. It is adjoined on the east, west, and south by single family residences in the Lakeland Hills South PUD, and on the northwest by a parcel that has been developed with a City of Auburn elevated water reservoir. All of the adjacent uses with the exception of the water tank, are single family residential in character; the water reservoir is a utility use. Special Exception Application Verizon Wireless site TAC Lakeland 5811 Panorama Drive SE Page 2 of 6 As noted previously, the subject tower was developed as a microwave relay tower in 1965 when the parcel was under the jurisdiction of Pierce County. The development surrounding the site has occurred in recent years. 2. Materially detrimental impacts to public welfare or injurious to property the zone or vicinity in which the property, is located; and Response The addition of the three antennas and ancillary equipment to the existing tower is for the purpose of providing Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) capabilities to the surrounding area. AWS allows better data throughputs for streaming content, and will enhance Verizon Wireless coverage and capacity to the surrounding area. As noted previously, there would be no change to the footprint of the existing ground mounted equipment. This addition would require only the extension of a hybrid fiber cable from the Verizon Wireless equipment inside the existing shelter to feed the antennas and ancillary equipment boxes mounted at the 88' height. 3. Consistency with the spirit and purpose of ACC Title 18 (Zoning). Response The addition of the three antennas and ancillary equipment to the existing tower will have no material effect on the existing site development. As was the case in 2009, and snore recently with the approval of VAR] 4-0003, the subject site will conform with the applicable sections of ACC 18.3 1, namely: ACC 18.31.100(C), Height: 1. Unless otherwise provided for, the height of any primary support structure and /or antenna shall not exceed the height limitations of the zone. 2. The maximum height of any primary support structure shall not exceed 120 feet. 3. There shall be no variances allowed to the height limitations. 4. The carrier shall provide evidence that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved the location of a primary support structure relative to the Auburn Municipal Airport. 5. Unless otherwise restricted by this section, building- or structure - mounted antenna may extend a maximum of 15 feet above the maximum height pennitted for structures within the zone. 6. Antennas that are mounted on structures that do not otherwise have a height restriction may be allowed to increase the overall height of the structure by no more than 10 percent of the height of the structure unless additional approvals are obtained. While the recent approval,of VAR144003 included au height increase of the existing tower, the aaddliatfon of three Verizon Wireless antennas will have no effect on the height of the tower. Special Exception Application Verizon Wireless site TAC Lakeland 5811 Panorama Drive SE Page 3 of 6 ACC 18.31.100(D), Setbacks: 1. All equipment shelters, cabinets, support structures or other above- ground facilities shall meet the setback requirements of the zone in which located except as follows. All equipment shelters, cabinets, or other above - ground facilities used to support primary support structures shall be set back the same distance required of the primary support structure. All equipment shelters, cabinets, or other above - ground facilities within a nonresidential zone shall be set back a minimum of 50 feet from any adjacent "R" zone. 2. The minimum distance from any primary support structure, of any height, to any residentially zoned parcel of property shall be a distance equal to the overall height of the primary support structure (including antennas) multiplied by a factor of two. 3. Where possible, roof- mounted antenna and equipment shelters and /or cabinets are to be placed towards the center of the building, or away from public views. Equipment shelters and /or cabinets shall be screened by a parapet or similar architectural feature. The addition of three Verizon Wireless antennas will have no effect on the location of the existing Verizon Wireless shelter or other ground mounted equipment. As was the case with the approval for Verizon Wireless' equipment in 2009, the subject site continues to be in conformity with this requirement. ACC 18.31.100(E) Fencing and Landscaping Fencing. Fencing is required to enclose all above - ground support equipment that is associated with primary support structures. Fencing will be 100 percent sight - obscuring as defined in ACC 18.31.020(0)(2), if visible from public right -of -way or less intense zone. Equipment shelters and /or cabinets shall be enclosed by fencing a minimum of six feet in height. Fencing shall meet the sight distance requirements of the city design and construction standards. Landscaping. a. Where above - ground support equipment is visible from public right - of -way, a minimum width of five feet of Type II landscaping as defined in ACC 18.50.040 will be provided on the exterior of the enclosing fence in order to effectively screen the equipment from the public right -of -way. Landscaping shall meet the sight distance requirements of the city design and construction standards. b. Where facilities are visible from adjacent residential uses, a minimum width of five feet of Type I landscaping as defined in ACC 1 8.50.040 will be provided on the exterior of the enclosing fence in order to effectively screen the equipment from the adjacent residential uses. c. Existing on -site vegetation may be used to meet the landscape requirements if approved by the planning director. Special Exception Application Verizon Wireless site TAC Lakeland 5 81 1 Panorama Drive SE Page 4 of 6 With the site's development in 2009, Verizon Wireless' equipment shelter and generator were enclosed by an existing fence, and a landscaping plan was implemented for the site. ACC 18.31.100(F) Aesthetics 1. In order to minimize any potential, negative aesthetic impacts from new primary support structures including protecting views to and from residential neighborhoods, mitigation may be required to blend the facilities in with the adjacent development or environs. Typical solutions for the support structure might include: an extension of the building, a component of a sign structure, disguising the facility as a tree, planting of tall trees, moving the location of the facility, painting or texturing the facility, etc. 2. Building- or roof - mounted antenna will be painted or textured to "blend" with the adjacent surfaces. 3. No lettering, symbols, images or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent street shall be placed on or affixed to any part of the WCF, unless required by the FCC or FAA. 4. Except as specifically required by the FAA (but must be approved by the city), freestanding primary support structures shall be painted a color that best allows them to blend into the surroundings. The use of grays, blues and greens might be appropriate; however, each application shall be evaluated individually. The antennas and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the existing conditions to minimize visual impacts. Only signs as required by the FCC are installed at the site. ACC 18.31.100(G), Lighting Freestanding support structures shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. Any proposed lighting shall be submitted at the time of the initial application. Any lighting must be reviewed and approved by the city. Security lighting used to light the equipment facility shall be directed downward, shielded and kept within the boundaries of the site. There are no signals or lighting currently installed on the existing tower, and the addition of 3 antennas below the top of the tower will not have any effect on site or tower lighting. ACC 18.31.100(I) Noise For the purposes of this section, WCF will be considered a Class B, commercial, noise source pursuant to WAC 173 -60 -040. An Acoustic Study was submitted in 2009, which showed the site in conformity with applicable noise requirements. The proposed addition of 3 antennas would have no effect on the sound levels at the subject site. Special Exception Application Verizon Wireless site TAC Lakeland 5811 Panorama Drive SE Page 5 of 6 Encl Existing Use: The subject area accommodates telecommunication facilities; the proposed antenna addition will have no effect on the use of the site. Access /Circulation: The site will be accessed by the existing driveway. The addition of 3 antennas to the existing tower will have no effect on traffic, because the site is unmanned and requires only 1 -2 maintenance visits per month. Federal Requirements A Non - Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification, prepared by BJ Thomas, P.E., is also included with this report. This report notes that the emissions from the existing and proposed antennas would be less than 1 percent of allowable maximum public exposure as established by the FCC. With this submittal, we believe that all of the components necessary for approval of a Special Exception to allow the installation of three additional antennas and ancillary hardware to the existing tower at 5811 Panorama Drive SE have been submitted. However, if additional information is needed or there are any questions arise, please contact me. I may be reached at (42.5)346 -0128 or via email at nnchaneyCiOdelia.com. Sincerely, Madeline Chaney Odelia Pacific Corporation On hehulf'gf Verizon Wireless Special Exception Application Verizon Wireless site TAC Lakeland 5811 Panorama Drive SE Page 6 of 6 SHEET INDEX cn Q ARCHITECTURAL T -I TITLE SHEET 3P -' SON RA_ NOTES 1-1 ^VERALL 511 �L -1 4-2 ENLARGE SITE PLAN ":J ANTENNA I410,T PLAN5 A -3 E_EV4TIOt.S - _ A -4 SETA -5 EL- ECTRICAL E-I ANTENNA GROUNDING PLAN =M1 D NOTES VerlfZ wireless Gaapo A WASHINGTON STATE CODE COMPLIANCE. 2012 15G STANDARDS AI.D AI'SN DM= NT5, JIAC 51 -SE 2012 IMC. STA "•DARDS AND .11'1EI�Ci" EM1T5 UAC S',_5_ TAC - LAKELAND 201: IFC, STANDARDS AND A 5' -54 TAC LA K E LA N D - END -TTS , UA ?012 UPC STANDARDS AVr Ai"END^'EN75. WAG 51 -50, 51 -� ST4ND I AWE I PROJECT SUMMARY AWS 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA 88092 APPLICANT, VSREDN WIRELESS ATC SITE REF. # 89523 155 -I-,a 5E 115231 5E_LEWE. W. ?- LEASINGAGENT, 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE CD LIA CDELIA PACIFIC CORD //// AVE SUI'E 190E 5E,17LE 0.A ?5151 AUBURN, WA 98092 j/ o GONTGCT. G_ENN PRE' 12061- 490 -39E GEL'_ 1:06! -251 -4561 a LAT: 470 15'22.20" N caNCP± PERMITTING AGENT• °°° , a $�s= 3o E "" M, ODELIA AVE 51``ORP- SITE I9eD LONG: 122° 13' 11.70" W SEAF7_ , LA SEAT _E. U�1 9916' GONidGT MADELI \E C4 -A�EY <:° °1-49°-3023 ELEVATION 555.0' AMSL www cnnrf'nssoc ca n PROJECT MANAGER, e 1-=LL ceL:ra.el- sas -012b n�bn�d °ael a _ °F CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DESIGN CONSULTANT• GA F e A55CGI4TE5 NC PREPARED BV• 19401 40T, AVE W, SUITE 304 LTyM1LLOCD, WA 99036 SIGNATURE BLOCK AREA MAP GONTACT' ERIC C.1t = APPflOVED BY• - - PHO� 425 - -40 -'0392 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SEE SHEET A -I -OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION TITLE SIGNATURE DATE - - - -- - SITE NAME- TAC- _AKE_AND - -- - consrFUClov • + FErrIT Isw SITE ADDRESS, 5911 °ANCRAYA DRIVE SE N /• ^;�O.ER _ _ --� -- _ _ _ -- ..,.� - - AUBURN, WA '_909: _, ••.•. -_�.,. - -_ LAND OWNER AMERICA M1 TOWER MANAGEMEP;T FRIP ENGINEER PO PDX 12353- ATLANTA. GA 3133 -059_ STRUCTURE OWNER- AnEI ICAN' TOTER CCRP - ATC S'TE REF 1 e'523 �� S I T �� JURISDICTION, Cl- CF aU5,RN - _ _ -• ` - REAL =b-ATE PARCEL NUMBER. C5200o2013 ZONING- - - - -(}- - SHEET NAME R -5 '- OCCUPANCY- U - UNMANNED TE'_ECCIMUNI AFCN 5'7 -_ - FACILIT- CONSTRUCTION TYPE- 'V3 SITIO!s• -- - n N -ZRTFI TITLE SHEET DRNING DI�CTICNS FROM VERIZCN WIREL E55132_45 ISSTH AVE SE SE LEWE WA W00aI - - - - SHEET NUMBER FROFERTY OWNER -__ `aw - PROJECT DESCRIPTION EE 1 1.O THE 5COPE OF LOW INCLUDES PROJECT NUMBER NSTdL_ THREE (3; AN7ENNA5 -'.ND CD TOWER MOUNT -D =MENi ",CUNiEG TOWER _ - AUiILIAR* EOJI r 5.5E EOUIFME\' 0 WNER _ _ - - _- �+__ rw+_�v,.rw one l+n.e_..re �, 20141009014 91O800LbtOl tl38WNN 103fOtld L —d V 83SWNN 133HS SHlON - WH3N3'J 3WVN 133HS _ 'Ae 03AOtlddV 'AS 03tltld3ld 'HBEVNVW 103fOSd v 11 � dl 3rvo a S11VI (ASSv +CINVO Do 28068 VM'Ntlf1SNtl 3S 3AIH0 VWVHONVd NBS 1 SMV1 ONVIDVTOVi } cnv rr.,,.a =, ! ns6310N ONIONtlONO 3 - -Soft anrn -�'cNa - - .aCVla,3ad NOXi C36V'e Sat �s 53iCia ca /`x'm O�w 3 >la3. A .tHw= - .i.run iN3w nc_mci cad_ iw� -va i. s!vx,o =3i!nur nv !cr!xs> GRIIIIII —3 OW -19 11-1 cs 3d d i a?l^ Sc 711 1- is 3e w cs!d,dwc=e ,-ns aa�. _!No,ic_iay. cxv a_md AaVS310N 1VDIUI0313 I31SVO tlNN31Ntl IX 3n S1N3NOdW00 ONIHIM SNOIIVOINNWW003131 -11 ion - .-- Cxv —. Isa��n 1-11 11 7-111 alevid_rn �v s � .b, >ad arec na miun.d a r, 3 �d msi Cd�s 'aa,�ae cr -r -nci anT moons n ,vb>l _ Eh.,_n�.., aw �i�, e9 E3is =1n'J CNI S c Crams cnv sa,e _3!v e Sb- AFWt';vluva'='ea?ts '8310N 1V13W airy s�n 11—sdaa_ nn1- 61v,Vac',�i�tV -III —K r>i'—+ Ili MI rs s3sw=a� - = xx ^u;'v c3 a�3ds ion 33, canzv axv nr= > id3a' ,i vaav ;aa'i'�va3+3: an! san.n3 - -�,ns ao!:.va.nc_ s1N... nw_ i. siM, islal_1a_�c_SNO,snc>= .an.s3 -yx �aV „VHS ao!>na!refi 3ni 2uNiu wN5_a �. _,nsa ..Nd bans >i .2.1- 11 sNV w i abN,>N�s'ia_3C I NI 3,snsxousv =u not >rrosN�a�,v acrnry 6aa'ras3 _ _ �!3_ sn! acv nn3a3czy =av! _n. i.rr3aa ". ,iym c3w>s 38 ,6310N 1Y63N3S ra s5iu =r, 3. _ _ � `zm snisxsu s ac ♦l!co> a>u ac SrCls iu >n^.�.. tV ' !> oisu> Sri N n.acs i_, ci ia.,iis aas's savu y'tr S31ON HOIOVN1NOO 0 \\ d �J Ile / \ Y NORTH OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE V20'-0' 122'x30) 1 40 -0' IIPx1711 5EC 7 CN O NSI-IP'_C R.' GE 05 0114: ET :I CON NE CG2 Cr NW TH W ALG N _ C= SEC 'r'.'C FT TI- 5 05 DEG 30 "'N 33 SEC E 33' C: _ TC PGB -- 5 :5 CEG- :3 MIN 30 SEC W 213 =T TH N — ?EG 53 MN :8 5EC W 2CC 12 _- \'.5 GEC-'_3 MIN 30 SEC E :CG 'r' S 61 CE_ 53 `1,N 3C 5EC E -00 =T TC PCE E.15E S F CG?C FCWiI �l ICNO 21-1i4 NCN OP °ROP FCRMEFL` _CC 21 GP �° GP DC E%EI'151 CC, 1ICIMJ EXISTING NEW 5yNI ART —SAS - E 5-OR4 —515- E E, W47ER _W_ :o <o ea 3 LEGEND SCALE NO SCALE "Jc=GGE ORE LIG -HT 5TANJG STREET LG4T •- -' SFOi ELE IG'O \' N' % -5 Cot'cLR `- -- -G- Y.INIAOLE ,•I C.1TG1- 3 >3'ti FIRE E -E" =NT LINE R LT LIT" -- „E,u' -- __ LINE L- LGI U? TAG- LAKELAND iAWSI 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA 88082 oc CAMP+ ASSOCIATES wwww cowmvnssoc cow PROJECT MANAGER• PREPARED BY- APPROVED BYE SHEET NAME OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER A -1 PROJECT NUMBER 20141008014 - ---- ----- -------- -IM - - - - - - / 7 JENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 4 1 SCALE, 1/4' - f-W 422x341, 1/8' - l'-O* (11x17) I I ...... .......... TAC-LAKELAND- NORTH (AWS) 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE BE 2 EXISTING ANTENNA LAYOUT PLAN AT 93H-0' A.G.L. AUBURN, WA 98092 SCALE- 1/4' l'-O' (22.34), 1/8' 1'-0' (11N17) ANTENNA COAX SCHEDULE TLT I T- -1- -H CAMP+ ASSOCIATES _01 40 H AVE W SHITE PHONE 14 4�2'5)) 392 4 E-TINE-Ol 11PAE- ET. PROJECT MANAGER, IPREPARED BY- N'l L T JAPPROVED BY, IOTE 1.1 _EIL 11 .-E I L- =TLET�& G) T_ rl- 11i G� - - ----- -- 0, 13, SHEET NAME 0 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AND ANTENNA V\'l LAYOUT PLANS NUMBER �21 NORTH A-2 NORTH 1L PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT PLAN AT 93'-0" A.G.L. F -PROJECT NUMBER 2 20141009014 M__ "B. . T-0. (11x17) L_ I T45 ........... TAG-LAKELAND (AWS) 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA 98092 oc CAMP+ ASSOCIATES PIl.,IE.T A.A.E• e xi PREPARED BY- APPROVED BY- 7F, -'. _ it SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS SHEET NUF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION �ALE E. PROJECT NUMBE R ,I0. (234') 1/* 2 . p IGENERAL NOTES F- I T 1-TI-T Sl AR-5 lu I 11 -E, A', T 2 T TO AL �T-- -TP T� FRONT SIDE BOTTOM 4 NOT TO SCALE ;JTOWER MOUNTED AMPLIFIER DETAIL 0 NOT �E M� AI! 6 INE PIPE MOUNT DETAIL NOT � T 7 .A E ISOMETRIC VIEW -T- -7 T ELEVATION VIEW �RRU MOUNTING DETAIL ..T T. ..L. Q) BOTTOM FRONT F SIDE TAC-LAKELAND (A 31 6811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN. NA 98092 -1 JIT' I I EI -1 -IT 4 1 EI I c CAMP+ ASSOCIATES -ol 4D PROJECT MANAGER, PREPARED BY- =ml APPROVED BT I6 ITi33 'F TOP SHEET NAME DETAILS SHEET NUMBER A-4 SIDE FRONT PROJECT NUMBER--] 20141009014 --6 P 6 INE PIPE MOUNT DETAIL NOT � T 7 .A E ISOMETRIC VIEW -T- -7 T ELEVATION VIEW �RRU MOUNTING DETAIL ..T T. ..L. Q) BOTTOM FRONT F SIDE TAC-LAKELAND (A 31 6811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN. NA 98092 -1 JIT' I I EI -1 -IT 4 1 EI I c CAMP+ ASSOCIATES -ol 4D PROJECT MANAGER, PREPARED BY- =ml APPROVED BT I6 ITi33 'F TOP SHEET NAME DETAILS SHEET NUMBER A-4 SIDE FRONT PROJECT NUMBER--] 20141009014 KEY NI ANTENNA _IELE 7TE .K- Ji) I. ElI_ A— ANTEl- I B,IETIIB lA.T-- - Al AT ..E I TITEE ElIT BAl- 1- - 1.1 T-I ILE TI lET 1. A 5i= AR: G -eCJND KIT EAEE CT- I ER TO 1- mc a 1=� LABLE -T.EW-1- IT E. T-1 5E - E_, 10ITT rCJE A --lNE Z:R T� 11 CCNVECT'O',l OF COAT r__lFLP ��.O_NIFD <IT ATIE-1 E', EAl AT ANT -Al- N= ANTEll IT IT I EENB AND Al.Tl IT LEI. I A E___ DIRECT , '46 �IISIT IHI BE 11 E III LITI LILE A) A-- TIIBT Ilin TE-1113 ILIE, eD _R ZET T� lEAT- R = 5HAI L BE I—- TALE KT, lK '4 NOT BE 1BEIT Ell- RG BAR COAXIAL CABLE GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION 3 NOT TO ..ALE TAC -LAKELAND I WS I 5811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE IT. - AUBURN, WA 98092 LEGEND ITGM DE-11T I, LABLE EITE-L E. 611111.7 T-El LL. IN -N A-11,11 GENERAL NOTES N� =A ILL BE B, TT- LI 1. El -, ccuTw_rcR oc CAMP+ ASSOCIATES ILEITITIAL 1AD-1 Al IBI I- Ell-Z. LIA T-1 oR E 11' 11- T TIE -TINAL I— III -IT.- I PROJECT MANAG• m, I-L BE -1-D A ILL 1— �p -1- _11- PREPARED BY- 5 T E BLE-111L INALL T-11 NB 5� III A D-_ C-E. IT B '01IN7 APPROVED 31• GROUNDING PILANS AND NOTES A _ (22x341, .".. _ "_.. (".") -3 ,E IIAL 16 LN5 COLLECTION GROUND BAR C��LLE TIO SCALE - KTR - ENALL BE FEED IN S��C W TI TIE DE3IN AND 1-CATI-E - ILL -CABLE I_- i AL- 6 ELIL 70 TkE IS-Cl W-LEE5 51 3 C�� IC N7E7 FLED LlC lAlITl :1- LEE I TIT GROL A.111 IE- I- A LEE L7 SO- 3 14 TIE -1-5 ENAL_ A-B, Li II E AE - 111T EEJE 1- INIL BE ABB.ITE, 6 RNG 5NA, L BE = 1 24'E Al BE 31 TIE T F-I PRODJCER (Pt TLE 1 AN- 11- IIETAL-A-AS ;Y�T III L_55.= �Nlll _-AAE I. IT. 7 III L1411111 I "",Zn L_.=lltr� E T 4��E I _Q�TT 11 INI lEA ETELII NANT-1- i 11-6 AN, sl A, 'LI -1 , NFALL -ULTLIS AIIC -M 11- F C EE.I. TNA, I-E TEEAT111-IT-1-1- 6 -LING NT 541, 11 15,] , BE n"O E 50-TEL I B .- LEI. I 1 1.1-181 - LT3 ANTT A p 'o LNILE��: ITAIN E NNE- TIT ITTE E-4 B-TI-IF 5YBTS`l NCLLl- SENT-Lg Lc i L�NMD I�D, ✓I.N, 5T-Il- D TISTILL11 LATE 11 eT5 ALTNNI-T-5 IEI,E NEII T-71 CR IT I ll III ob c IF 'A co) 0 jjnj 00] C, Q. S. Na, �oo 1, - -1 tE--B ITY-E 145 -1-3 Z _EA�-TIT 5TLN514A_ TELTIll T I BE _ I _ , ZI: TE� Il AN -IT-AL 21 �I= =:TT- a NTI R-1, E N-BE" 41 141 Is EllL :1 E�ILM ILL 1 711 T� III 11T 3-1- A - I �, �'d .1I AILT4 I- I,- iT. ,LTA I F TE _1 EAlll"ElT7= 11 T-�� EN -I. LBNl .1 .1 �T I 1, 70 TlES E NT ST PAR ETLIE AN SHEET NAME ANTENNA GROUNDING PLAN GROU AND NOTES 'T ETTIL BE I - I. C-1 IN-E 11 1 T TNE R T-1 . BE-11 IIIAL 1- 1 -1 LIN_ 2- 1-- 511L T E- IIE- T-ITE1 �l ALL 11 _ TD BE 1L TITI 3 NALI .I-'; aNEI 11 LIALIT. -1 -1. 1 .1 IE 13 1 1. C, L 1-5 IT E-- I SHEET NUMBER E [_-PROJECT 20141008014 ER GENERAL NOTES ]GROUND BAR CONNECTION DETAIL AND NOTES F__ NOT TO SCALE NON - IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION uuuuuuuuuuuip��h��l��pUpIN °�S� ' lip 01 �� , itliP;';�lllllllVlllllllllllllu' �� ¢w 1 " Ai SITE NAME: TAC Lakeland SITE ADDRESS: 5811 Panorama Drive SE Auburn, WA 98092 DATE: March 26, 2014 B- B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607801h Ave NE Marysville, WA 98270 (206) 851 -1106 PROJECT The proposed Verizon Wireless project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located at 5811 Panorama Drive SE, Auburn, WA 98092, King County Tax Parcel 0520062013. The planned improvements include additional panel antennas mounted on an existing 99' AGL self - support lattice tower with supporting BTS (Base Transmission System) radio equipment located at the base of the tower in an equipment shelter. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: CDMA, PCS, AWS & LTE Antennas: Amphenol BXA- 80063, BXA- 70063, BXA- 185063 & WWX063X19X00 Antenna Rad Center: 89' AGL CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97 -01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that "for a truly worst -case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground -level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four -fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density ". Therefore the following equation is used: S = E I RP /TrR2 Where S = power density (mW /cm2), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturer vertical pattern information using a conservative 20 dB loss below main lobe. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the tower and the power density is 0.001636 mW /cm2 with an assumed worst -case power level of 2,000 watts ERP for the lowest antenna array. This is 0.3502% of the MPE limit for the general population /uncontrolled exposure of 0,467 MW/CM2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A for the lowest frequency range. Routine environmental evaluation is required if the PCS broadband facility is less than 10 m (32.81 feet) AGL and has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,OOOW ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. As the proposed antennas lowest point above ground level is 25.9 m (85 feet), the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the tower, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to access the tower for maintenance operations. Verizon Wireless and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occu patio na I/contro, I led limits. Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. WA; I 1 0.11 * MPE Calculations r. I 1A0 A4�,J WAS lf,,N . . . . . ...... ONAL SEA Lakeland MPE Calculations Effective tower height assumes a person 6 ft tall main beam tower height 1 64E -03 height, hypotenuse (ft) 100016 6 max power density in mW /cm y 0 3502 % lipercentage of standard honz Dist , x Note 0 467 mW /cmz is 100% of allowable standard for lowest frequency effective radiation tower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below horiz dist hyptonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobe minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) length (km) length (cm) (wafts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW /cmA2 89 83 90 20 0 000 83 000 0 025 2529 840 2000 6301 4301 45 17 3288743 1.64E -03 TOTAL 1.64E -03 3/26/2014 BXA- 70063 - 8CF — EDIN —X '(fl II : II II �Ih11 Frequency bands Polarization Horizontal beamwidth Vertical beamwidth Gain Electrical downtilt (N) Impedance VSWR Upper sidelobe suppression (0 °) Front -to -back ratio ( +/ -30 °) Null fill Isolation between ports Input power with EDIN connectors Input power with NE connectors Lightning protection Connector(s) Dimensions Length x Width x Depth Depth with z- brackets Weight without mounting brackets Survival wind speed Wind area Wind load @ 161 km /hr (100 mph) 696 -806 MHz 806 -900 MHz ±45° 65° 63° 9° T 15.5 dBd (17.6 dBi) 16.0 dBd (18.1 dBi) 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 5052 <_1.35:1 -16.2 dB -32.9 dB -19.0 dB -31.3 dB 5% ( -26.02 dB) < -25 dB 500 W 300 W Direct Ground 2 Ports / EDIN or NE / Female / Center (Back) 2405 x 285 x 132 mm 170 mm 10.9 kg > 201 km /hr Front: 0.69 ml Side: 0.31 ml Front: 1031 N Side: 581 N 94.7 x 11.2 x 5.2 in 6.7 in 24 I bs > 125 mph Front: 7.4 ft' Side: 3.4 ft' Front: 232lbf Side: 129lbf 3 -Point Mounting & Downtilt Bracket Kit 36210008 40 -115 mm 1.57 -4.5 in 6.9 kg 15.2 Ibs Concealment Configurations For concealment configurations, order BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN- 1,: -FP BXA- 70063 -8CF- EDIN -,X 90 BXA- 70063 -8CF- EDIN -0 90 1 � 30 1 o� a3_a,_,a=o o� 0 ' o a I o IS o 15o 120 6o 90 Horizontal 1 750 MHz 90 6o 90 0° 1 Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 150,,', ,0 150,,', o 0 120 6o 90 Horizontal 1 850 MHz 6o 90 0° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN -2 3o lo ro ,_ o 3o 15o Ni 2° Vertical 750 MHz �dminl,ii",.dl��,,�.i�dl;ild, wiil[ l'd1 I�,�innl i' il'��O tlgdn� 1' "1 1)II1 w1 i11 "I'dl ' kid, if —1, l in111fl1 I BXA- 70063 -8CF- EDIN -3 BXA- 70063 -8CF- EDIN -4 90 go 6o 6o 3° Vertical 750 MHz yrors „ry,jo 3o 15o 3o 4° Vertical 750 MHz go 3o lo 30 '50 30 o o o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o 6o 6o 6o 90 90 90 2° Vertical 850 MHz 3° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz 4° 1 Vertical 850 MHz Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 1 of 2 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV100113 BXA- 70063 - 8CF -EDI N -, Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 2 of 2 www.amphenol- antennas.com REV100113 BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN -5 BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN -6 90 BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN -7 90 BXA- 70063 - 8CF - EDIN -8 90 BXA-70063-8CF-EDI N-1 0 90 so 3o 15o "o " i O ICO .r. �� 3o 15o d .a is .n so , .o „iii. "'a s 0 Co� 15o , 3o 5o rss 0 b 3o .. b o 15o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o p 5o 3o 5o fl I 3o 90 5° Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 90 6° 1 Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 90 T 1 Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 90 8° 1 Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 90 10° 1 Vertical 1 750 MHz 90 Aso 3o 15o o 15o .o I s or so' to � o o 0 o .,. . ' o o 0 m' 15o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o 5 o 3o 5o 3o 90 5° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz 90 6° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz 90 T 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz 90 8° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz 90 10° 1 Vertical 1 850 MHz Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 2 of 2 www.amphenol- antennas.com REV100113 BXA- 80063 - 8CF - EDIN -X '(fl I1 -11 Frequency bands 806 -900 MHz` *Optional frequency band for iDEN 806 -941 MHz (specify when ordering) Polarization ±45° Horizontal beamwidth 63° Vertical beamwidth T Gain 16.0 dBd (18.1 dBi) Electrical downtilt (N) 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 Impedance 5052 VSWR <1.4:1 Upper sidelobe suppression (0 °) -19.0 dB Front -to -back ratio ( +/ -30 °) -31.3 dB Null fill 5% ( -26.02 dB) Isolation between ports < -25 dB Input power with EDIN connectors 500 W Input power with NE connectors 300 W Lightning protection Direct Ground Connector(s) 2 Ports / EDIN or NE / Female / Center (Back) IIII IIII m�I�III 1Mu�umiu uiil u�u uum �� a uiil 1iil�uum �� liuu a lium uiii�uil u1�u V�mriullluiil miu IIII o Dimensions Length x Width x Depth 2405 x 285 x 132 mm 94.7 x 11.2 x 5.2 in Depth with z- brackets 170 mm 6.7 in Weight without mounting brackets 10.9 kg 24 Ibs Survival wind speed > 201 km /hr > 125 mph Wind area Front: 0.69 ml Side: 0.31 ml Front: 7.4ftz Side: 3.4 ft' Wind load @ 161 km /hr (100 mph) Side: 581 N Front: 232lbf Side: 129 Ibf IIII � , ,III mu " ""3 oigil www.amphenol - antennas.com -Point Mounting & Downtilt Bracket Kit 40 -115 mm 1.57 -4.5 in 6.9 kg 15.2 Ibs Concealment Configurations I For concealment configurations, order BXA- 80063 - 8CF - EDIN- ^ -FP �dmini,ii",.dl��,,�.i�dl;ild, wiil[ l'd1 ��,�inn, i, n,��0 t�gdn� � "1 1)II1 w1ili "I'dl ' kid, if —1, l in111fl, i BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -,X oo BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -0 oo BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -2 BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -3 90 90 BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -4 go o,,', so,,', o 0 0 30 " 00 � y n •_ ,° 3� 3,. , oo o o 00 o o 0 0 = to 4 3o 5 o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o 120 6o 90 Horizontal 6o 90 T I Vertical 6o 6o 90 90 2° 1 Vertical 3° 1 Vertical 6o 90 4° 1 Vertical BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -5 90 6o BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -6 90 6o BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -7 BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -8 90 90 6o 120 6o BXA- 80063 -8CF- EDIN -10 90 i6 so Iso ( 0 s I Aso, 3o �r I ` ° 3 o' ooi o 00 o 00 11.:: oo+ o o 15o 3o 15o 3o 15o 3o 5o 3o 5�1 3o 6o 90 5° Vertical 6o 90 6° 1 Vertical 6o 120 6o 90 90 T 1 Vertical 8° 1 Vertical 120 6o go 10° 1 Vertical Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 1 of 1 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV101713 BXA- 185063- 8CF - EDIN -, '(fl 11 .11 It,gdn,, MHI, , iii,l�k 11,,d ;'mdh, Ad , ill'i i , .dk A'.dkil.d, wi01 '1I 'jinn , i, qp:l t,gdn,, "I l;ill'A will, "I'AI ' in do of -d' I i11111ik I Frequency bands 1850 -1990 MHz Polarization ±45° ill' Horizontal beamwidth 63° Vertical beamwidth 7° Gain 14.9 dBd / 17.0 dBi plllll „ °° Electrical downtilt (N) 0, 2, 4, 6 Impedance 504 VSWR !0.4:1 IIII First upper sidelobe < -17 dB Front -to -back ratio > 30 dB In -band isolation < -25 dB IM3 (20W carrier) < -150 dBc Input power 300 W Lightning protection Direct Ground Connector(s) 2 Ports / EDIN or NE / Female / Center (Back) Operating temperature -40° to +60° C / -40° to +140° F uu ou �IIp�uI lMllmlmnl III IIIIIII ICI II VIII Iliill I Vuuu ICI Iillll II ulllll uIII�IdI�l�ll 'm�ill�llllrilllllldll mnl Dimensions Length x Width x Depth 1225 x 154 x 105 mm 48.2 x 6.1 x 4.1 in Depth with t- brackets 133 mm 5.2 in Weight without mounting brackets 4.2 kg 9.2 Ibs Survival wind speed >201 km /hr >125 mph Wind area Front:0.19 mz Side: 0.14 mz Front: 2.0 ft' Side: 1.5 ft' Wind load @ 161 km /hr (100 mph) Front: 281 N Side: 223 N Front: 63lbf Side: 50 Ibf IMu�uuilBu uum ICI m ullll�l �� uum um�m�u uiYlil�l uu IIIIIIII miiu I�Ii IMhu uuI I�IIMIdVmo uuI I�IIIVI um I I Il�illl um ImidiIIIII��dIII�iIIIIMuMmdu� �VI�V uuuhl rtmdl IVVI 2 -Point Mounting Bracket Kit 26799997 50 -102 mm 2.0 -4.0 in 2.3 kg 5 Ibs 2 -Point Mounting & Downtilt Bracket Kit 26799999 50 -102 mm 2.0 -4.0 in 3.6 kg 8 Ibs Concealment Configurations For concealment configurations, order BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN- '^': -FP BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN -,4, BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN -0 BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN -'2! BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN -4 BXA- 185063 -8CF- EDIN -6 90 90 90 90 Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 1of1 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV012913 WWX063X19x100 Il,i,auu C R ", II:.. ll Il auud Manual Electrical Tilt WWX063X19111100 Remote Electrical TiItAISG v1.1 WWX063X19FE00 Remote Electrical Tilt AISG v2.0 / 3GPP WWX063X19.w00 Frequency bands Polarization Horizontal beamwidth Vertical beamwidth Gain Electrical downtilt Impedance VSWR Upper sidelobe suppression Front -to -back ratio In -band isolation Isolation between ports Input power IM3 (2x20W carriers) Lightning protection Operating temperature Connector(s) Dimensions Length x Width x Depth Weight without mounting brackets: MET Weight without mounting brackets: RET Survival wind speed Wind loads (160 km /hr or 100 mph) Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) Control RET Module Part Number (one per antenna) Important Installation Instructions 1710 -1880 MHz 1850 -1990 MHz 1900 -2170 MHz 2x ±45° (Quad) 70° 67° 66° 5° 4.5° 4° 18.3 dBi 18.6 dBi 19.0 dBi 0 -10° 5052 <1.5:1 < -17 dB typical >27dB >30dB >30dB 4x250W < -153 dBc Direct Ground -40° to +60° C (40° to +140° F) 4 Ports / 7/16 DIN / Female / Bottom 1906 x 307.3 x 177.2 mm 14.5 kg 14.8 kg 241 km /hr Front: 707 N: Side: 419 N 75.0 x12.1x7.0in 32.0 Ibs 32.7 Ibs 150 mph Front: 159 Ibf: Side: 94 Ibf The remote control of the electrical tilt is managed by a module (MDCU) totally inserted at the bottom of the antenna. One single module controls individually the tilt of each band (no need of daisy chain cables between the bands). This module does not add any additional length at the bottom of the antenna. For RET control, the transparent caps must be in place and locked. The tilt angle indicators always remains visible and the antenna still has manual tilt control (manual override). MDCU -A0000 for AISG v1.1 protocol (one unit included in WWX063X19FE00) MDCU -G0000 for 3GPPP /AISG v2.0 protocol (one unit included in WWX063X19.w00) In order to operate RET control, the transparent caps covering the tilt adjustment indicators must be engaged and locked. Do not cut them from the antenna. 3 -Point Mounting Bracket Kit MKS09P02 50 -115 mm 2.0 -4.5 in 4.1 kg 9 Ibs 3 -Point Mounting & Downtilt Bracket Kit MKS09T02 50 -115 mm 2.0 -4.5 in 6.4 kg 14 Ibs For use inside UNICELL modules I UNX -20 -xx Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 1 of 5 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV060113 WWX063X19x100 ;. II ll W u u u Ili : u ", I "l" I u u u d Bottom View Tilt indicators covered by transparent caps. Manual adjustment is accessed by removing the caps. Knob colors are the same as the connectors. In order to operate RET control, the transparent caps covering the tilt adjustment indicators must be engaged and locked. Do not cut them from the antenna. 150 30 150 30 150 30 'o G 00 V u... b 0. b 30 so'', 30 120 6o 6o 120 6o 0° Vertical 1800 MHz 0° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 0° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 2 of 5 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV060113 WWX063X19x100 u C R ", II : ll Il a u u d Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 3 of 5 www.amphenol- antennas.com REV060113 1710 -2170 MHz (Left Array) 150 30 i t , „° 150 30 150 30 .3I 120 6o 90 2° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 2° Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 2° Vertical 2100 MHz 90 .s° 30 .s° .s °, 30 .,, I 0 o 18o o 30 120 6o 90 4° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 4° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 4° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 v ° 150 30 N ,tu �v ° 150 30 ,. W �N' °° II s s ° 150' d r 5o” J 30 120 6o 90 6° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 6° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 6° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 150 30 150 30 s i° 18o I ° 18o I ° 0 ` � ... nM 3° Aso'' ^, �,....,,. Aso �' ............... . 120 6o 90 8° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 8° Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 8° Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 150 30 150 30 ° °i 5� 30 30 15o 30 120 6o 90 10° 1 Vertical 1800 MHz "o 6o 90 10° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 120 6o 90 10° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 3 of 5 www.amphenol- antennas.com REV060113 WWX063X19x100 u C R ", II : ll Il a u u d Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 4 of 5 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV060113 1710 -2170 MHz (Right Array - White) 90 90 I5o 3o I5o 3o p I5o o ;:,,, .. 0o o 00 5o o', 3o I5''', o 3o 120 6o 90 Horizontal 1800 MHz lo "o 6o 90 Horizontal 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 9 o Horizontal 2100 MHz 90 150 30 "o Y d 1 "Yd „ "lo 150 30 Ie0 d .'"15 .•� 0 150 30 Ie0 o 150' , I5 I5 „",'� 120 6o 90 0° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 0° Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 0° Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 150 30 150 30 o eo o looi o 50 30 150 30 15o, 30 120 6o 90 2° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 2° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 2° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 -I5o' ry.,,. 0 loo I "r l0 � � s e o �, l 0 loo :, ... "I loo I � ,�,. l0 0 30 30 0 120 6o 90 4° Vertical 1800 MHz 90 "o 6o 90 4° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 90 120 6o 90 4° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz 90 150 30 150 30 150 30 �N� looi to loop o looi Ilo 5' 30 30 30 120 6o 90 6° Vertical 1800 MHz "o 6o 90 6° 1 Vertical 1900 MHz 120 6o 90 6° 1 Vertical 2100 MHz Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 4 of 5 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV060113 WWX063X19x100 u C R ", II : 'll' Il a 1.11 Quoted performance parameters are provided to offer typical or range values only and may vary as a result of normal manufacturing and operational conditions. Extreme operational conditions and /or stress on structural supports is beyond our control. Such conditions may result in damage to this product. Improvements to product may be made without notice. 5 of 5 www.amphenol - antennas.com REV060113 TAC Lakeland � 2r 4u - Auburn, Copyright © and (P) 1988 -2010 Microsoft Corporation and /or its suppliers All rights reserved http / /wdwv microsoft com /streets/ Certain mapping and direction data © 2010 NAVTEQ All rights reserved The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, © Queen's Printer for Ontario NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc All rights reserved Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc © 2010 by Applied Geographic Systems All rights reserved cj- L.ke�d -�iii1 � Pacific 5 t 5E- - It Lakeland Hills Park �e\N Ct s TAC Leland rn _ 47.25617ON 122.2199 OW qjI - - L4 _ � 2r 4u - Auburn, Copyright © and (P) 1988 -2010 Microsoft Corporation and /or its suppliers All rights reserved http / /wdwv microsoft com /streets/ Certain mapping and direction data © 2010 NAVTEQ All rights reserved The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, © Queen's Printer for Ontario NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc All rights reserved Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc © 2010 by Applied Geographic Systems All rights reserved Exhibit 3 VAR14 -0004, 2012 Aerial Photo Printed Date:4/2/2014 Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. N W E S Exhibit VAR14 -0004, Zoning Map Printed Date:4/2/2014 Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. N W E S Exhibit 5 VAR14 -0004, Comprehensive Plan Map Printed Date:4/2/2014 Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. N W E S Exhibit 6 -� �� [FY{�r , � Na0cy�� Mayor WA S H 1114 GTO 1,,l 25WeuWiin Street * 8ubumWAA000l4998 + www.aubumwa.ynv *253-931-3UOO This notice is to inform you that the City of Auburn has received the following application that may be of interest to you. The application may be reviewed at the City of Auburn Department of Community D8Ve|UpDl8Dt & Public Works, 1 East K88iO Street, 2'dfloor, Auburn, WA, SOOO1. Nature mf Project orRequmst: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section 18.70.020.A.3 to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition Of three antennas (0.3Sqft each) and ancillary equipment 8tO8 foot level Ofexisting tower on @ site zoned R5, Residential. The Special Exception is required since the use is non-conforming tO use regulations Ofthe zone. Location: 5OOO block Of Panorama Drive SE. The site iS within the NE quarter, 0fthe NVV quarter OfSection O' Township 21 NOrth, Range 5 E8St, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Assessor's Parcel No. O52OOO2O13. Oa1g of Notice of Application: August 4, 2014 Permit Application Date: March 28. 2014. Revised July 1, 2814 Date of Notice mfCompleteness: July 14.2O14 File No: VAF|14-0004 Applicant: Madeline Chaney, [)de|i8 Pacific Corp. oO behalf 0f Verizon Wireless The review process for approval of the proposal may include requiring mitigation measures under applicable codes and imposition of mitigation measures regardless of whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is prepared. Other Permits Required: Subsequent development will be required to obtain all necessary permits or approvals that may include a storm permit and building permits. Additional Studies Provided with the Application: Verizon TAC-Lakeland 5811 Panorama Dr SE, Proiect Plans, Sheets T1.0, SP-1, A-1 through A-4 & E- 1._ Camp & Associates, June 30.2014. Request for Special Exception Narrative, Revised June 10.2014. Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis & Engineering Certification, TAC-Lakeland, 8J. Thomas PE, March 26, 2014. Public Comment Period: You are invited to C0nlnoent. request copy Of the decision, when available, and bH made aware Of any appeal rights. Comments must bereceived in writing by the Auburn Department Of Planning and Development atthe mailing address: 25 West Main, Auburn, \8A\8#OO1-4A88and located at: 1 East Main 8ƒ[8ft' Auburn VVA9GO01 before 5:00 p.m. on August 19' 2014 (min. 15 days) or presented at the public hearing. ��U�� u��| M(AU'TI IAN YO�J IMAGINED Public Hearings: A Hearing Examiner public h8@hOg is required for the SD8C8| Exception and iS scheduled for 5:30PyWOO August 2O,2O14iD the Council Chambers 81 25 West Main Street, Auburn, VVA98O01. Statement of Consistency and List of Applicable Development Regulations: This proposal is subject to and shall be consistent with the City of Auburn Zoning Code, Surface and StO[nOVV8ie[ Management Ordinance, Street & Utility Standards, and |OteFO8tiOO8| Building & Fire Codes. If you have further comments or questions related to this application, you may contact Jeff Dixon, P|8DDiOg GeRjCe3 Manager 8i/253\ 804-5033 or idixonaaubgMpa.goy If you call or write, please reference File No. VAR1 4-0004. For citizens with speechoighmhearingoisabilitieowinhing to review documents pertaining to this hearing, should contact the City of Auburn within 10 calendar ohyo prior to the mnobnD as to the typo of aenxco or equipment needed, Each request will bo considered individually according bo the type ufrequest, the availability nfresources, and the financial ability of the City to provide the requested services or equipment. V. A North / / �^ (� / Exhibit 7 City of Auburn, Finance Dept City Clerk 25 W Main St Auburn, WA 98001 Re: Advertiser Account # 107302 Ad #: 459052 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish Agency Account #: 0 Agency Name: Affidavit Of Publicati ®n The undersigned, on oath states that he /she is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times has been approved as a legal newspaper by others of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distrib- uted to its subscribers during all of the said period. Stiaron Age�ti'� Signature_—, o�pf7� � Subs � cribed and sworn to before me on ✓ i> r , CIAOO CIA, .n Ma " Ualy� Sagliatur') Notary Public in an for he S ate of Washington, residing at Seattle � �I Re: Advertiser Account # 107302 Ad #: 459052 Agency Account #: 0 Agency Name: AD TEE 1 CITY OF AUBURN 1' NOTICE OF APPLICATION &HEARING PUBLIC HEARING: Hearing Examiner, August 20, 2014 at 5 :30 pm COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL APPLICATION REQUESTED; SPECIAL EXCEPTION to expand a non - conforming Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) APPLICATION NUMBER & NAME: VAR14 -0004 / Verizon. PROPONENT: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. on behalf of Verizon Wireless PROPERTY LOCATION: 5800 block of Panorama Drive SE. The site is within the NE quarter, of the NW quarter of Sec- tion 6, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Asses- sor's Parcel 9 0520062013. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section I8,70,020.A.3 to expand an existing Wire- less Communication Facility by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq it each) and an- cillary equipment at 88 foot level of exist - Ing tower on a site zoned R5, Residential, The Special Exception Is required since the use is non - conforming, APPLICATION FILED: March 28, 2014, Rev. July 1, 2014. COMPLETE APPLICATION:July 14, 2014. NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 4, 2014. STUDIES SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATON: • Verizon TAC- Lakeland 5811 Panorama Or SE, Project Plans, Sheets T1.0, SP -1, A -1 through A -4 & E -1. Camp & Associates, June 30, 2014. Request for Special Exception Narra- tive, Revised June 18, 2014. Non - Ionizing Electromagnetic Expo- sure Analysis & Engineering Certification, TAC - Lakeland, BJ, Thomas PE, March 26, 2014. OTHER PERMITS AND PLANS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED: storm permit & building permits. STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY AND LIST OF APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: This protect is subject to and shall be consistent with the City of Auburn Zoning Code, Surface and Stormwater Manage- ment Ordinance, Street & Utility Standards, International Building & Fire Codes. All persons may comment on this applica- tion either in writing to the address below by 5:00pm on August 19, or by submitting written or oral testimony during the public hearing, Any person wishing to become a party of record and receive future no- tices, copies of the Planning Dept report with recommendation (one week prior to hearing), Hearing Examiner decision or any appeal decision must notify Planning Dept, by providing their name, mailing ad- dress veoiafnnAA PIhANN NiGaANDnDE- (253) 804.5033, Contact: Jett Dixon, run- ning Srvs Manager, idix0n , burnwa aov For citizens with speech, sight or hearing disabilities wishing to review documents pertaining to this hearing, should contact The City of Auburn within 10 calendar days prior to the meeting, as to the type of ser- vice or equipment needed. Each request will be considered Individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources, and the financial ability of the City to provide the requested services or equipment. Exhibit 8 CITY OF, ....::.... A.:,9BUIRN ....: <' WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF LEGAL NOTICE Application No.: VAR14 -0004 Applicant: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. on behalf of Verizon Wireless Location of proposal: 5811 Panorama Drive SE, Auburn WA 98001 The site is within the NE quarter, of the NW quarter of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Assessor's Parcel #0520062013. Nature of Project or Request: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section 18.70.020.A.3 to expand an existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) by addition of three antennas (6.3 sq ft each) and ancillary equipment at 88 foot level of existing tower on a site zoned R5, Residential. The Special Exception is required since the use is non - conforming to use regulations of the zone. Date of Public Hearing: August 20, 2014 1 certify that on or before August 4, 2014 1 did send a Notice of Public Hearing for the above referenced application, as required by Auburn City Code 14,07.040 and 18.66.130, to all property owners located within 300 feet of the affected site. Said Notice was mailed pre -paid stamped through the United States Postal Service at least 10 days prior to the public hearing date noted above. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Tina Kriss, Com unity 11evelopment Secretary 0uO Exhibit 9 ` CITY OF .ADBURN WASHINGTON u � - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ux NOTICE 0FAPPQKAT|ONgnd�rNOOKE OF HEARING Application No.: VAR14-0004 Applicant: Madeline Chaney, Od8|i8P8CJC Corp. Onb8h8�Of Verizon Wireless Location ofproposal: 5811 Panorama [hveSE, Auburn VA 08UO1 The site is within the NE quarter, of the NV quarter Of Section O. Township 21 NO�h'Range 5 East, V.W. Pierce County, Washington. 8SS8SSO�SParcel #0520062013. ' Nature -��R�u�:G ie|E��onpu�ua��{�{�o��on 187O.O2U./3tO expand 8O8xSUDQVF8�5S [oDDUDiC8tiOn Facility (VCF) by addition of three antennas (0.3Sq� each) and 8OCiU8ryequipment 8i88 foot |9w8| of existing LOV8[ UO 8 site zoned R5. Residential. The5p8Ci8|EnC8ptiODiSP3qUi[8dSiOC8th8US8iSnOn- COOfO[OiDgLOuSe[8gU|8ti0nSOfthe zone. Qo1e of Public Hearing: August 2O.2014 | Cerhfvthat UO or before did erect the land Use posting notice oNogof An�|i�ot�n' within 14 days after the application was board(s) at the location(s) above, which included a determined complete (ACC 14.07.020) and posted 8 minimum Of15 days prior tO8 scheduled open hearing per 14.O7.O3U (if 8pp|iC8b|8). Notice of Public Hearing, posted o minimum of1O days prior toascheduled open hearing ACC18.6O.110 and ACC1O.00.13O. | declare under penalty Of perjury Of the laws Of the State Of Washington that the foregoinq is true and correct. Name (please print or tyTe) Signature Date NOTE: This affidavit must be returned to the Planning and Development Department within one week of the notice date to assure this application does not continue on hold and to assure that a scheduled hearing /a not postponed ACCY.27O70. Planning and Development One East Main Street, Auburn, VVA 98001 (253) 931-3090 vmww.@UbUFDVV8.gOv Exhibit 10 CITY OF AtiBURPeter B. Lewis, Mayor WASHINGTON �T L�I 25 West Main Street * Auburn WA 98001 -4998 * www.auburnwa.gov * 253- 931 -3000 September 25, 2009 Ms. Sarah Telschow dba RealCom Associates, LLC 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Bellevue, WA 98007 Re: Application No. MIS09 -0008 — Special Exception — Verizon Wireless TAC Lakeland Dear Ms. Telschow: Attached is the Hearing Examiner's official decision regarding your request that was considered by the Hearing Examiner on September 9, 2009. Your land use posting board sign must stay posted until completion of the request for reconsideration period as stated in the Request for Reconsideration portion of this document. If you have any questions regarding the attached, please give me a call at (253) 804 -5031. Sincerely, Stuart Wagner Planner Planning, Building & Community SW /bh CORR09 -346 Attachment cc: Cindy Baker, Planning Director Dani Daskam, City Clerk AUBURN* MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Findings and Decision Application No.MIS09 -0008 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Any party of record who feels the decision of the Examiner is based on error of procedure, fact or judgment, or the discovery of new evidence may file a written request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner no later than October 2, 2009 by 5:00 p.m. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA. 98001 -4998. Page 2 Findings and Decision Application No.MIS09 -0008 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final however the planning director or any interested party affected by the examiner's written final decision may appeal the decision to superior court of the county in which the project is located. See Auburn City Code Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.66 for specific information. Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF AUBURN Phil 01brechts, Hearing Examiner RE: Sarah Telschow / Verizon I FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Wireless - TAC Lakeland OF LAW AND DECISION Special Exception MIS09 -0008 INTRODUCTION The applicant has applied for a Special Exception for the site preparation and installation of nine (9) panel antennas and associated ground improvements to an existing legal nonconforming tower. The Hearing Examiner approves the Special Exception. ORAL TESTIMONY See transcript / recording of hearing. No one other than staff and the applicant testified. In response to questions from the Examiner, staff testified that the proposal complied with the City's noise standards and that the footprint of the current antenna structure was used as a base to assess the increase in use proposed. EXHIBITS Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10, as set forth on page 2 of the August 25, 2009, staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: 1. Applicant. The applicant is Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates, LLC, on behalf of Verizon Wireless. 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application at Auburn City Hall in the Council Chambers on September 9, 2009, at 1:00 p.m. Substantive: {KNE742437.DOC;1 \00083.900000\ } Special Exception P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3. Site /Proposal Description. Verizon Wireless has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99 -foot lattice tower) with the addition of nine (9) panel antennas and associated ground equipment on a site zoned R -5, Residential. The ground equipment includes an equipment shelter and back -up emergency diesel generator within an existing fenced lease area. The equipment shelter is proposed to be eight feet by sixteen feet (8' x 16') and will be placed adjacent to the existing equipment shelter that is approximately sixteen feet by twenty -two feet (16' x 22'). All structures are to be located within the existing fenced area approximately 3,300 square feet in size. There will be no increase in height of the lattice tower. The antennas will be painted to match the color of the existing tower, and the proposed generator will meet all applicable noise standards according to the Applicant's Acoustical Study. The lattice tower and associated equipment can be accessed off of Panaroma Drive at the top of an access road that has a slight incline. The site has a slight plateau surrounded by mature trees, evergreen and deciduous, which substantially shield from view the ground level telecommunication equipment currently found at the site. The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998, and the original lattice tower was approved by Pierce County in a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. The property is zoned R -5, Residential. The purpose of the R -5 district is to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of four -to -five dwellings per acre. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan similarly designates the subject site as Single Family Residential. Surrounding development includes single family residential development. 4. Characteristics of the Area. The site is bordered to the north, south, east and west by similar single - family residential use, all zoned in the Lakeland Hills South - PUD zone. The site to the north is vacant and currently owned by the City for a future water department facility. 5. Adverse Impacts. A SEPA Final Determination of Non - significance was issued on August 25, 2009, for the project. The expansion of the nonconforming use should not impair the quality of the neighborhood, because most of the additional ground equipment will be shielded from view by the trees in the area and the lattice tower will not be increased beyond its current 99 feet in height. Noise impacts will be within the City's noise standards. Consequently, the Hearing Examiner concludes that there will be no unmitigated adverse impacts as a result of the development. Procedural: f KNE742437.DOC;1 \00083.900000\ 1 Special Exception p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. ACC 18.70.020 grants the Hearing Examiner with the authority to review a request for a Special Exception and make a decision thereon. Substantive: 2. Zoning Designation. The property is zoned R -5, Residential. 3. Review Criteria and Application. ACC 18.70.020(A)(3) provides that the Hearing Examiner may grant a special exception to allow expansion of a nonconforming nonresidential structure up to 25%, provided that expansion meets the applicable standards of Title 18 and other requirements of the City. According to staff, the addition of nine (9) panel antennas will constitute approximately 1% of the total area of the existing tower, which is well below the 25% allowed by code. ACC 18.70.020(B) the criteria for approval of a special exception. They are quoted below and applied by corresponding conclusions of law. ACC 18.70.020: In considering applications for special exceptions, the hearing examiner shall consider the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures, and no such special exception shall be authorized by the hearing examiner unless the hearing examiner finds that the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, and that the authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this title. In authorizing a special exception, the hearing examiner may impose such requirements and conditions with respect to location, installation, construction, maintenance and operation and extent of open spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this title as may be deemed necessary for the protection of other properties in the zone or vicinity and the public interest. 4. Properties along Panorama Drive in this area are characterized by suburban residential development with a mature tree canopy. The existing lattice tower is visible along portions of Hazel Avenue and Panorama Drive, which are local residential streets surrounding the site, but the project will not result in an increase to the tower's height. The subject property's equipment area is not visible from the public right -of -way as a result of the tree growth, and it is anticipated that the ground equipment associated with the project will remain shielded from view as a result of the landscaping plan proposed for the site. Granting this special exception to allow the addition of nine (9) panel antennas will result in a minor expansion that will appreciably change the character of the existing wireless communication facility to allow for improved service coverage in the area but will not be out of character with adjacent uses and structures as the new panel antennas, painted to match the tower, will not significantly alter the look of the existing tower. As described above in Paragraph 5, the Hearing Examiner concludes that there will be no significant adverse impacts as a consequence of the project. {KNE742437.DOC;1 \00083.900000\ 1 Special Exception p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DECISION The Hearing Examiner approves the special exception to expand the existing nonconforming structure as proposed in Application No. MIS09 -0008. Dated this 21st day of September 2009. /s/ Phil Olbrechts Phil Olbrechts City of Auburn Hearing Examiner {KNE742437.DOC;1 \00083.900000\ 1 Special Exception p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Findings and Decision Application No.MIS09 -0008 DECLARATION OF MAILING CITY OF AUBURN COUNTY OF KING On thee day of September, 2009, 1 deposited into the United States of America mail, postage prepaid, copies of the foregoing addressed to the applicant and parties of record. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed at Auburn this day of September, 2009. L2�i� Z-v 4,::l Roll5erta Hodgkinson Department of Planning, Building & Community Page 4 CITY OF In WASHINGTON AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Hearing Application No. MIS09 -0008 Date: 8/25/2009 Department: Planning, Attachments: Please.refer to Exhibit Budget Impact: NA Building, and Community List Administrative Recommendation: Hearing Examiner to approve the Special Exception as requested based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions as outlined below. Background Summary: OWNER: American Tower Management (property /tower) 116 Huntington Avenue 11 Floor Boston, MA 02116 LESSEE: Verizon Wireless APPLICANT: Sarah Teischow of RealCom Associates, LLC 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Bellevue, WA 98007 REQUEST: Special Exception pursuant to ACC Section 18.70.020.A.3 for the site preparation and installation of nine (9) panel antennas to an existing legal non - conforming tower on a site zoned R -5 Residential (5 dwelling units /acre), in order to accommodate a new wireless communication provider. Additional improvements include an equipment shelter and a back -up emergency diesel generator within the existing fenced lease area LOCATION: The property is located at 5811 Panorama Drive SE. (Pierce County Parcel Number 0520062013) EXISTING ZONING: R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre) EXISTING LAND USE: A wireless communication facility on 0.95 acres with a 99' lattice tower (117' 9" to top of structure) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential SEPA STATUS: Final Determination of Non - Significance issued August 25, 2009. Appeal period ends September 8, 2009 Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: ❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑, Building ❑ M &O ❑ Airport ❑ Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor ❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Serv. ❑ Finance ❑ Parks ❑ Human Services ❑ Planning & CC ❑ Fire 0 Planning ❑ Park Board ❑ Public Works ❑ Legal ❑ Police ❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other ❑ Public Works ❑ Human Resources ❑ Information Services Action: Committee Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing Referred to Until Tabled Until U13URN *MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: Application No. MIS09 -0008 Date: 8/25/2009 Councilmember: Staff: Wagner 1 Meeting Date: September 9, 2009 Item Number: The Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land use of the surrounding properties are: EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Master Land Use Application and building plans, received 6/23/09 Exhibit 3 Non - Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification, B.J. Thomas, P.E., June 8, 2009 Exhibit 4 Structural Analysis Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — American Tower Engineering Services, June 1, 2009 Exhibit 5 Acoustical Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — Cornerstone Engineering, June 11, 2009 Exhibit 6 Responses to City of Auburn Correction Letter dated July 13, 2009, received 7/17/09 Exhibit 7 Notice of Application /Public Hearing and Vicinity Map Exhibit 8 Affidavits and Confirmations of Publication for Legal Notices Exhibit 9 Aerial Photograph and Photo - simulations Exhibit 10 SEPA Determination of Non - Significance FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99' lattice tower) with the addition of 9 panel antennas and associated ground equipment on a site zoned R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre). 2. The non - conforming structure may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. Page 2 of 4 Comprehensive Plan' Zoning Land Use . North Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Vacant, Residential, Public City -owned site for Quasi Public future water depart facility South Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential East Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential West Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Master Land Use Application and building plans, received 6/23/09 Exhibit 3 Non - Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification, B.J. Thomas, P.E., June 8, 2009 Exhibit 4 Structural Analysis Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — American Tower Engineering Services, June 1, 2009 Exhibit 5 Acoustical Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — Cornerstone Engineering, June 11, 2009 Exhibit 6 Responses to City of Auburn Correction Letter dated July 13, 2009, received 7/17/09 Exhibit 7 Notice of Application /Public Hearing and Vicinity Map Exhibit 8 Affidavits and Confirmations of Publication for Legal Notices Exhibit 9 Aerial Photograph and Photo - simulations Exhibit 10 SEPA Determination of Non - Significance FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99' lattice tower) with the addition of 9 panel antennas and associated ground equipment on a site zoned R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre). 2. The non - conforming structure may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. Page 2 of 4 Agenda Subject: Application No. MIS09 -0008 Date: 8/25/2009 Councilmember: I Staff: Wagner Meeting Date: September 9, 2009 1 Item Number: The Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land use of the surrounding properties are: EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Master Land Use Application and building plans, received 6/23/09 Exhibit 3 Non- Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification, B.J. Thomas, P.E., June 8, 2009 Exhibit 4 Structural Analysis Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — American Tower Engineering Services, June 1, 2009 Exhibit 5 Acoustical Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — Cornerstone Engineering, June 11, 2009 Exhibit 6 Responses to City of Auburn Correction Letter dated July 13, 2009, received 7/17/09 Exhibit 7 Notice of Application /Public Hearing and Vicinity Map Exhibit 8 Affidavits and Confirmations of Publication for Legal Notices Exhibit 9 Aerial Photograph and Photo - simulations FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99' lattice tower) with the addition of 9 panel antennas and associated ground equipment on a site zoned R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre). 2. The non - conforming structure may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date.of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. Page 2of4 Comprehensive ;Plan` ._ .zoning Land Use North Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Vacant, Residential, Public City -owned site for Quasi Public future water depart facility South Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential East Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential West Single Family Lakeland Hills South - PUD Single family residential Residential EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Master Land Use Application and building plans, received 6/23/09 Exhibit 3 Non- Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification, B.J. Thomas, P.E., June 8, 2009 Exhibit 4 Structural Analysis Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — American Tower Engineering Services, June 1, 2009 Exhibit 5 Acoustical Report — Verizon TAC Lakeland — Cornerstone Engineering, June 11, 2009 Exhibit 6 Responses to City of Auburn Correction Letter dated July 13, 2009, received 7/17/09 Exhibit 7 Notice of Application /Public Hearing and Vicinity Map Exhibit 8 Affidavits and Confirmations of Publication for Legal Notices Exhibit 9 Aerial Photograph and Photo - simulations FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99' lattice tower) with the addition of 9 panel antennas and associated ground equipment on a site zoned R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre). 2. The non - conforming structure may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date.of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. Page 2of4 Agenda Subject: Application No. MIS09 -0008 Date: 8/25/2009 This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage." The Special Exception involves the addition of 9 new antennas, an equipment shelter, and a back -up emergency diesel generator within an existing fenced tease area. The new equipment shelter is proposed to be eight foot by sixteen foot (8' x 16') and will be placed adjacent to the existing equipment shelter that is approximately sixteen by twenty two (16'x 22') feet in size. All structures are to be within an existing fenced area approximately 3,300 square feet in size. There will be no increase in height of the lattice tower. 4. Based on the applicant's research the original lattice tower was approved by Pierce County in 1965 with a Building Permit. Piece County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. It is apparent from the current application and the observable conditions that the facility consists of a 99 -foot high lattice tower with a fenced in yard that is approximately 3,300 square feet in size, surrounded by native vegetation on a 0.95 acre site. The site was developed prior to annexation in to the city of Auburn in 1998 (Ordinance No. 5089). 5. The proposal is non - conforming because pursuant to ACC Section 18.48.100.K, the City's wireless communication facilities (WCF) regulations only allow Type 1 D WCF in residential zones. Type 1 D WCF involve antenna located on existing buildings or public facilities such as water towers. This application proposes a Type 2A WCF, which involves the placement of new antenna on an existing primary support structure that has previous city (or county if annexed) approval. Type 2A must meet the height requirement of the previous approval and is limited to 50% expansion of the equipment area (ground level). 6. The property is zoned R -5, Residential (5 dwelling units /acre). The purpose of the R -5 district is to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of 4 -5 dwelling units per net acre. This zone will provide for the development of single - family detached dwellings, and for such accessory uses as are related, incidental and not detrimental to the residential environment. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Single Family Residential. The plan is used by the City Departments to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code and other development regulations, which must be consistent with the plan. 8. The lattice tower and associated equipment is accessed off of Panorama Dr., at the top of an access road which has a slight incline. The site is a slight plateau surrounded by mature trees, evergreen and deciduous, which substantially shield from view the ground level telecommunication equipment currently found at the site. 9. Surrounding development includes single family residential development. 10. The proposed development is not exempt from SEPA categorical exemption thresholds; therefore, a SEPA checklist and environmental determination was required for the proposed project. A Final Determination of Non - Significance was issued on 8/25/2009 11. Staff conducted a site visit on July 7, 2009, to verify the proposal and surrounding conditions. Page 3 of 4 Agenda Subject: Application No. MIS09 -0008 Date: 8/25/2009 CONCLUSIONS: ACC Section 18.70.020.B provides criteria for Special Exceptions: A. Consideration shall be given to the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures prior to authorizing; Properties along Panorama Drive in this area are characterized by suburban residential development with a mature tree canopy. The existing lattice tower is visible along portions of Hazel Avenue and Panorama Drive, which are local residential streets that surround the site. The subject property's equipment area is not visible from the public right -of -way. Granting this special exception to allow the addition of 9 panel antennas is a minor expansion that will appreciably change the character of the existing wireless communication facility and will not be out of character with adjacent uses and structures. As described by the applicant, the proposal will not create any significant impact to the surrounding area and the addition is consistent with the current use. B. That the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; The proposed expansion will be subject to all applicable building codes and regulations, including the requirement of engineering evaluation for additional structural loading. As indicated by the applicant, the project would improve communication service coverage in the area without having to build a new primary support structure. The existing lattice tower is well screened by mature vegetation with portions of the tower visible from the public right -of -way. The new panel antennas will not significantly alter the look of existing tower. The antennas, associated mounting hardware, and coax will be painted to match the existing tower in order to blend in and to minimize visual impacts. A landscaping plan has been proposed for the site that will further screen a proposed equipment shelter and generator. The special exception, if granted will not significantly alter the character of the neighborhood or be detrimental to surrounding properties in which the lot is located. C. The authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of the zoning code. The intent of the Special Exception provision in the zoning code is to allow the Hearing Examiner to approve limited expansions of existing non - conforming development. The applicant is proposing to maintain and increase capacity on a lattice communication tower that was constructed in 1965. The addition of nine panel antennas on the tower constitutes approximately 1 percent of the total area of the existing tower which is well below the 25 percent allowed by code. No expansion will take place on the ground as the new equipment shelter and diesel generator will be located in the existing fenced in area. Staff believes it is reasonable to allow the expansion of the non - conforming structure to accommodate an upgrade to the facility. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the application and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the staff report, Staff recommends that the Special Exception be approved. Staff reserves the right to supplement the record of the case to respond to matters and information raised subsequent to the writing of this report. Page 4 of 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION Vcrizon Wireless (here after rcicrrcd to as "Vcrizon ") is a wireless telephone company operating throughout the United States of America. Vcrizon is licensed to operate in the United States by die Federal Commurnications Commission (FCC). Vcrizon is currently upgrading its network in the King/Pierce County area to make available improved telephone service and provide wireless capacity to its subscribers. Tlus proposal describes the scope of the proposed project by providing specific information regarding the project location, zoning, specifications, and required services. It is Verizon's desire to work with the City of Auburn to ensure that this project is consistent with local ordinances and zoning regulations while providing wireless coverage to Verizon's customers and provide critical communication services for emergency, business, and personal use. Project Goals The goal of the Vcrizon TAC Lakeland Site is to provide coverage in the area of Lakelaro Hill subdivisions. Vcrizon intends to achieve these network goals consistent with all policie" and e ") � ".e ordinances of the City of Auburn. ce. • � Application Request Plan`' . p The applicant is requesting the following: ' • Special Exception • SEPA DNS c • City of Auburn Commercial Building Permit , I c,icc,u t 4 irckss 7,1(' Lak(la !d Page I GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview The applicant, Verizon, proposes to attach nine (9) panel antennas to an existing legal non- conforming tower in order to accommodate a new telecommunication facility at 5811 Panorama Drive SE Auburn, Washington (Parcel Number 0520062013). The proposed telecommunication facility consists of nine (9) panel antennas, an equipment shelter which will house radio equipment and batteries, and a back -up emergency diesel generator. Please see Sheet A -1.1 and A -2 in the enclosed drawings for more detailed information. Verizon will secure a lease with the owners that will allow for construction and maintenance of this facility, necessary utility connections, and provisions for access to the site. Facility Specifications ■ Antennas - Verizon is proposing to attach nine (9) panel antennas to an existing tower. Please see Sheet A -1.1 and A -2 in the enclosed drawings for more detailed information. ■ Color - The antennas, associated mounting hardware, and coax will be painted to match the existing tower in order to blend to minimize visual impacts. ■ Equipment Shelter - The proposed eight foot by sixteen foot (8' x 16') equipment shelter will house radio equipment and batteries. ■ Facility Maintenance - The facility is generally serviced once a month. One (1) to two (2) employees are on site for an average of four (4) hours of maintenance checks. This check is typically for preventive maintenance purposes. In the event of a problem, a crew is dispatched to the site immediately. ■ Generator - Verizon is proposing a 50KW generator with a one hundred twenty (120) gallon diesel tank for emergency back -up power. Verizon's generator will meet all applicable noise standards. Please see the enclosed Acoustical Study. ■ Radio Equipment Cabinets - Each cabinet contains radio equipment and /or batteries. The proposed battery cabinet can contain up to sixty (60) batteries. The proposed batteries have the following acid and electrolyte capacity: Menzowl YT/11rcless 7A%L?Ice%' nd Page 2 Battery TWO Electrol a Acid Lead Wei Bat Lead Oxide Wei b Wei bt I "Volume R(-)-H Wei tat Volume C N lka I flbs llitres t allons lkg Abs 111tres I 1, allons lkg I llbs lkg I llbs NSS40INSS12 -180 2.6 1 51 2.0 0.5 1.1 2.4 0.8 0.2 9.1 20.2 3.4 1 7.6 NSS70INS812 -330 4.3 9.4 3.2 0.9 1.8 4.0 1.4 0.4 15.3 33.8 5.2 11.5 NS875tNS812 -270 4.3 9.5 3.3 0.9 1.8 4.0 1.4 0.4 15.0 33.0 5.9 12.9 NSB90INSS12 -3'70 6.2 13.6 4.7 1.2 2.6 5.7 2.0 0.5 20.1 44.2 8.0 17.6 NSB125INSS12.475 8.1 17.9 6.2 1.6 3.4 7.5 2.6 0.7 26.8 59.1 11.0 24.3 NSS40FT 2.4 5.3 1.8 1.0 2.2 0.8 0.2 7.2 15.9 3.3 7.2 NSB60FT 3.7 8.1 2.8 1.6 3.4 1.2 0.3 10.9 24.1 4.7 10.4 NS89OFT 5.3 11.6 4.0 2.2 4.9 1.7 0.4 16.0 35.3 7.4 16.4 NS8100FT' 6.2 13.6 4.7 P2.08 2.6 5.7 2.0 0.5 18.1 39.8 8.0 17.7 NSB110FT 6.8 15.0 5.2 2.9 6.3 2.2 0.6 19.9 43.8 9.1 20.1 NS8145FT 9.0 19.8 6.8 3.8 8.3 2.9 0.8 25.7 56.6 12.0 26.5 NS8170F'T 10'.4 22.9 7.8 4.?6 9.7 3.3 0,9 28.7 63.3 14.4 311,8 All weights and volumes are for 12V- monobloc The proposed batteries are valve regulated. Verizon's equipment will meet all applicable noise standards. Screenin:; - A landscaping plan has been proposed for this site. Please sec Sheet L -1 and L -2 for more detailed information. GENERAL SITE ANALYSIS Zoning General Plan Designation The property is zoned Single Family Residential (R -1). Verizon's proposed tclecommiuiication facility is not specifically addressed in the Auburn City Code (ACC) 18.48.100(K) Zoning Districts in which Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (WCF) arc permitted: 771c G111rmi»e; lahle 11111s71-ales nlli(j] iortiit d1"51iir9s the 13Pes oft a ililies, as dclill(d 1),rACC 18,01.9I2(j), arc allowed ill rld 1111ir11 pelinils arc rcquimd. Zoning District Permitted Administrative Use Conditional Use ]IIZol)c 14) I -DI 1 -D2 R(-)-H / A I -B I -C C N ]-A 1 -13 I -C CI, LHO ]-A 1 -13 I -C C'2 111 1 -13 I -C C'3 1- 13,1- -,1 1 -C; 2 13, 33,1 3 - -13 tI I 1 -13, 2,1 1 -C 213, 3=3 - -,1 ,3 -13 Al2 I -B, 1 - -, ] I -C ; `1-13, 3-,1 3 -13 1 (Y7 %ol1 1 1 11 -Tess T,9 C LAcktud Page 3 P -1, LHYl 1 -13, 2 -A I -C, 2 -13 3113 I, LHI ]-A I -13 I -C IF, 1 A I -13 I -C 1. A110rrauce for the 14,Mo extend to a bei�l11 of'20 pcicent ofthe .suppo-ainy Structure. 2. Allouwnce for the 14,C1+ to evend to a beibhl o1'30 pelcellt of the supporting• struclul e. 3. The Ill adllnunj be&il alloued, Illelu(k4' alllellllas, IS 4.J reel. According to the ACC 18.04.912(j), the following outlines the different types of wireless telecommunication facilities: For the purposes Of dete17nhihig in TTbich Zonhig' disc cts rd71'e1ess connnul)lcations 17d.'11111eS dl'C t0 be pan-nJ11ed, they rr7ll be classAied put' mut 10 the 16116 T ig' 111)es. Rcfcr to the table ill ACC 18.E /8.10000) to determine r4lich zones allowlor the Iollouii i g types ol'bicflflies: TYPE 1. Type I a1'e nervilDlemms elected on el7Shl11, hullckgs ol'1101nes7dellllal '51mcl ums. 771e1 e arc %Our separate 7Jpe I categories described as 1011orm 111. The comhllled hclghl Of the a111e1111a log'elhel' u lb Ilse he -1wil Of the exlStlllb' bu11d111P' cannot be 25 pelcellt greater than the ealsthig hulldlllg OI' exceed 1110 llClbhl llnllla11011 01111e /.OI11YW' dlSllYcl 111 Tyllch /lie bulldlllg'IS located. I -13. 771e comhlllc'd height Of the alltelllla logelller rr7lh the height Of 1be eiZslI11g building caunol be 50 pelcellt glealer than the ellsllllg brllldlllg or exceed the helgbl hlllllal1on Of the %o11111q' drsu c1111 which the blllldipg IS located, I -C. The colllbllled height of the 7DIC.U.IM l0q'ClhC1' Mill] the 11e1,0111 Of /he c'S7SIIlIb' building 1S 50 pelcellt gl'c'aler Man the exjl lhig bulldlllg' Ol' exceeds Ilse height IIInitali011 0f the Z011ing' disllicl hi rmhlcll the building LS located. 7The hel�hl hlnital1011 01111c 7-011111g' diM c1 can only be exceeded by 25pe1cc111. I -D. Antenna localed 011 exivi ig !Patel' louv s, alble c held hgbl poles) or 511111171' public Llllhlylnfl'aSll'lld.'LUI'C 1101located rT7lbin public sll eel IYblll °Ol- may, The belglll Amitation Of the TTC1' !7711 be 10 pelcellt of the exjl zirlg s6'uclum, helghl, but may be ll1d,'I Eased l0 a ma 17111 urn of '20 percelll W7lh all ad1111117S1t atime use pennil and slay be nlcreased to a Inaallimm Of 30 pel'ce111 Ti4lb a cOndlhonal use pelmll. 771c lle1�ht llllllla0011 Of the 7.011111,' dVificl inay be exceeded i- ela11Pe l0 /lie above proi, sions allouvd for a 1 -1) facility. TYPE' 2. 7)pe 2 arc new ante ms el'ecte'd 011 ealsihig Onlnary) Suppoit structU1'es Thal hime preT70us city appr'Onals. 771C'm me 111,0 sepamle Type 2 categories described as 16110rrs: 2 -A. Must meet bei�lll requhaments ofpimious app1omal and I's lilniledl to 50 peirem total (cumubatime) e,Ipausio -a of equlplllelll alea. 2-13. Has gl'Cale'I'hcighl requirements than pref4ouS apiwomal and alloms fiv more than a 50pelcelll expansion Of the equlplllellt yra. 1/1CM -01, If/11Cle55 7AC Lakeland Page 4 TYPE 3. 7 },pe 3 rs the e1'ecllon OI new �pn7 mnJ ) suj)jJol't strucimes. 771e1e are Imo scparrle 7 }Pe 3 caleg'olies described as 1o11orrs: 3-A. Moijoj)ole.5 that a1 e 751eel orless hi height, 3 -j3. Monopoles that are 1no1e than 7, 1kel in hciWil or Irttice lorrels ol'any heiWht; Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility does not meet any of the above mentioned types of wireless telecommunication facilities. The proposed facility is to be located onto an existing legal non - conforming tower. Accordingly, a Special Exception is being requested for the proposed co- location. Special Exception According to ACC 18.70.020 Special Exceptions, A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 1. Platted lots within the same block and same zone, but separated by a public alley, may be used as a single building site for the purpose of calculating the number ol' dwelling units permitted in a structure to be erected on one side of -the alley, subject to the following requirements: a. Each portion oI the properly shall abut a minimum of 100 Feet upon the alley. b. The two portions ol- the property shall be directly opposite for a distance representing at least 50 percent of the width of the portion of the property rroL to be occupied by the proposed building. c. The portion of the property not occupied by the building shall not be sold, segregated or used for building purposes so long as the building remains on the portion of property oil the opposite side of the alley. 2. Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an existing building a special exception may be issued to exclude the floor area within the building, that cannot be ellectively utilized by the proposed use, from the oil= street parking requirements. 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the cllective elate of the ordinance codified in this Lytle may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of' this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of' this title and other requirements ol- the city. This section does not allow Lhe expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage. Ven7011 YVrr Bless 7ACLakelancl Page 5 4. Pursuant to ACC 18.54.060(G), a special exception may be issued for the replacement of a nonconforming structure or part thereof which does not comply Nvith the appropriate development standards. 5. Pursuant to ACC 18.54.070(13), a special exception may be issued for residential uses, in commercial or industrial zones, to reoccupy if unoccupied for longer than 180 days. B. In considering applications for special exceptions, the hearing examiner sliall consider the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures, and rho such special exception shall be authorized by the hearing examiner unless the hearing examiner finds that the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public Nvelf are or injurious to properly in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, and that the authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this title. In authorizing a special exception, the hearing examiner may impose such requirements and conditions with respect to location, installation, construction, maintenance and operation and extent of open spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this title as may be deemed necessary for the protection of other properties in the zone or vicinity and the public interest. (Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) The original tower was approved by Pierce County in 1965 with a Building Permit. Pierce County was contacted to obtain previously approved conditions /restrictions. Unfortunately, Pierce County's records do not have any detailed information regarding the tower approval. Verizon Wireless's proposed co- location will not increase and/or expand the existing use and /or structure more than twenty -rive percent (25 %). According to Pierce County records, the original tower was constructed for the purpose of a "microwave tower and radio shelter ". Please see the permit information provided in the addendums of this document. The tower was is currently being used to provide telecommunication services therefore the addition of Verizon Wireless would not be changing and /or expanding the use of the tower. Additionally, Verizon Wireless is utilizing the existing tower without any height increase and /or structural upgrades necessary to accommodate the co- location. Verizon's proposed equipment is being located within the existing fenced equipment compound. Therefore, the proposed co- location meets all applicable requirements to utilize the existing legal non - conforming tower and adheres to the special exception criteria. Legal Non - Conforming Structures According to ACC 18.54.060(G) (II): G. This chapter shall not prevent the following provided the total value of (lie improvements, over the lifetime of the nonconforming use, does not exceed 50 percent. of the assessed value of the nonconforming use as established by the most current county assessor's lax roll; and, the nonconforming use or structure is not expanded except as allowed by subsection H of this section; provided further, that any replacement of a nonconforming structure, or parts thereof, must comply willh (lie appropriate development standards unless a special exception is granted pursuant to ACC 18.70.020. 1. Strengthening or restoring to a sale condition any nonconforming structure or part thereof which is declared to be unsafe or a hazard to the 1/e177011 14111CIess TA Lalc elan d Page 6 public by the order of a city official charged with protecting [lie public safety; 2. Lessening a hazardous situation, nuisance or other adverse environmental impact; 3. Bringing the structure or use into more conformance with this title; 4. Adapting the structure to new technologies or equipment, 5. Improvements which do not increase the intensity of the nonconforming use. H. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use alter the effective date of the ordinance codified inn this title may be permitted by means of a special exception issued by the hearing examiner pursuant to ACC 18.70.020 to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at (lie time of die adoption of the ordinance codified in this tide; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage. The original tower was approved by Pierce County in 1965 with a Building Permit. Pierce County was contacted to obtain previously approved conditions /restrictions. Unfortunately, Pierce County's records do not have any detailed information regarding the tower approval. Verizon Wireless's proposed co- location will not increase and /or expand the existing use and /or structure more than twenty -five percent (25 %). According to Pierce County records, the original tower was constructed for the purpose of a "microwave tower and radio shelter ". Please see the permit information provided in the addendums of this document. The tower was is currently being used to provide telecommunication services therefore the addition of Verizon Wireless would not be changing and /or expanding the use of the tower. Additionally, Verizon Wireless is utilizing the existing tower without any height increase and/or structural upgrades necessary to accommodate the co- location. Verizon's proposed equipment is being located within the existing fenced equipment compound. Therefore, the proposed co- location meets all applicable requirements to utilize the existing legal non - conforming tower and adheres to the special exception criteria. Height According to the ACC 18.48.100(C), the following outlines the height requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: 1. Unless othe'rrtise proi4(led 161', t11C 1)C1�111 Ol 711y J)IiIDXy Supl)OR SIMCIMI'e' aDdlor antelma Shall not exceed the height hnl tiallonS of the Zonhig dlStl ki. 2. The ma anum Ile&5I ol'any piimaly support structure .shall not exceed 120 %et. 3. I bere shall l)e Ito KrlianCes aIIor4 ed to the llgi k lilnitations. Vcnz_on 1j1'eless TACLA cchnid Page 7 4. 7110 Cal1ICl' Shall pl'OT ?de CTQdence that the hedel'fll Atial on Ad11111115'lm111on (FAA) has approved the location ofa pjr�nmysupport slluc'lum iel7tim to the Auhunl Municipal AhpolY: UWess olherwse r•c'Stllcled by this section, hulldlllg- of siruclul'C -,inou lied antenna Inay extend a Inaxhnum Of 15 feel ahome Ibe ma limn herght permitted 101'Sllucanes Tt lhhi the Zone. d. Antenna, that dl'0 mounted on Sll7lclules that d0 not otheruf se 11a1'C a heglil 1Csliklron, may he allowed to hwrease the oVClalllie&V Of the stl'uclul•c' by 110 more than 10 Percent of the herghl of /lie struclm e unless additional appl•oi,als al•C Obla111ecl Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility is to be located onto an existing tower and the height of the proposed facility will not increase the height of the existing tower. Setbacks According to the ACC 18.48.100(D), the following outlines the setback requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: 1. All equipment 5%ielle1S, cahlnels, suppoil shucluves of Other- ahoTc- g,I'OUnd Achilles Shall meet the Sethaclf requll'emenls of the zone 111 r4117C1i located except as follows. All equipmenl .shellers, c'ahinets, or other ahome- Riound ACI lies used to suppoa prrrnaly support struclules shall he set hack the .same distance Icquhvd of the plrmaly support struclule. All equipment Sllellels, cahrllels, or Olher ahome- g, %olllld AClhhCS f1'Ithl71 a Dow- eSldential '/_0710 Shall he Set hack a Innnlnunl of 50 feel horn any aC%Jacelll W�7_one, 2. The Inhihnuni diSlance h'011l anyply1muy suppo -a siructu' e, Of filly belWil, t0 any residentially zoned parcel of properly shall he a distance equal to the OVeI'dll Ilerglil Of the plllllaly 5'uppoiY Sll•uclum (ilxludlllg fuilenna5) multiplied by a helot of'ITTo. 3. 14111e1e possrhle, fool- II10UIlled antenna and equlpment shelleis andlor cabinets ale to he placed lorr'wds the cenler of the hurldrng; of away from public T7euf v. I;qulpincnl Sllellels andlol• cabr11C1s Shall he .scivened by a parapet orsilnrltu uchrtectmalfealule. According to the ACC 18.12.040(L) the following outlines the setback requirements within the 11-1 zone: 1. Front: 25 feet 2. Side, interior: for lots 75 feet or wider one side shall be five feet and the other 10 lect, for lots less than 75 feet (vide, each side may be live feet, 3. Side, street: 10 feet, 4. Rear: 25 feet. Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility meets the applicable R -1 setback requirements. Please see Sheet A -1 for more detailed information. Fencing and Landscaping According to the ACC 18.48.100(F), the following outlines the fencing and landscaping requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: f. FCllclrlg: FLIl(.'ing'I.SI'CgU11'CCllO CIIL'IOSG' all ahOVC- p�YCJUl1d Supp017 egUlpnlL'lll that Ls assocIavc] Ttith pllmdly SuppOlt Sl1•UC'luies. Tencllrg' tu7l he 100 VCI17-011 ljl elesS TACLakeland Page 8 peirent sight - obscuring' as defined in ACC 18.48.020(0)(2), il' f�isi /ale 1ie1n Public nghl- Ol -f7wy O]' less intell.Se 7- cuing' d1s117c1: - Equlp111e111 s%lelleis 7ndloi, G7hiiiels 511711 he ellclOS'ed bykiiclllg' 7lnnlilllu111 o1 slxke1'nl height. 2. L711 d caplllg: a. 14Ileie home- -ouud suppol'1 equlpinelll is w? ihle 11'Oln public 17ghl -ol- rvaj, a 111irliululn Tf dth 011lve feel Ol Tjpc Hlaudscaplllg7.S def111ed In ACC 18.50.010 TnIl be promided on the cliche' of the euclosnlg'1CIlCe In of -demo ellectvelyscireil the equijllnellll101n the publiclig11l -01 -r a b. 1417ic1e blcilities are risible Iroln adjacent I'esidenaa1 uses, 7 lninin1um width of hVe feel of Type Il uldscapilig' as defined hi ACC 18,50, 0,10 Tall he pl'Of7ded on the exte1701' ofthe enclOSnlglellce lit older to el%c6f ely scleen the equ1j)'Incl11 h'0111111e adjacelllles'ldental uses. c. Existing- oil -s le fegelado11 may he used to heel the 17ndscape 1 equllelllents ll7ppi'oved by die plailniilg' dl1eC101: Verizon's proposed antennas, equipment shelter, and generator will be enclosed by an existing fence. A landscaping plan has been proposed for this site. Please see Sheet 1,1 and L -2 for more detailed information Aesthetics According to the ACC 18.48.100(F), the following outlines the aesthetics requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: 1. 111 order t0 nllllmliw any potential, negatime esthellc Impacts 11 om new p immy supp0 /'l structures iucludil)yprolecthg' PIeus t0 and ll'On1 I'esldeutial DaighholJloods, anlligalian may he 1'Cquilyd to blend the lacjkks In rfllh the x1jacellt develop111e11t OI' euja1ous. 7Jplcal solutions 101' die suppoli St'ucluir inlglll include: DUI extension ofthe blllld111g; 7 conlponcul" 017 s'Igll structulC, (11squishig' the Aclllly 7S 7 Ilee, planting' 01 '1811 11'CeS, MOW Jg' the locali011 ofthe 17CII11y, p71111111g' ar tcxtlling'the l7L7hly, etc. 2. Building= of loolmounled antenna Brill he painted o' textured to "blend" rr4lh the adjacent sui /aces. A No letleni ig; .symbols; images of trldema lis huge enough to be legible 10 occup7nlS Of mehlcll %7l' 11711hc on any 7c%j7cewl sueel shall be placed on OI' allixed to anyp71t ofthe ITICT, unless requited by the FCC o1FAA. I. Except as specifically lequiled by /lie FAA (but must he approved by the City), h''eCSt711dlllg'pllln7.IY SUppolY s1ruclul es sliall he paroled 7 color that hest allows than to hlelld into the sull'oundings. The use of grays, blues and ,teens might be applopliale; horrevej; each application shall he ewduated Ind!f4clu7ll The antennas, associated mounting hardware, and coax will be painted to match the existing tower in order to blend to minimize visual impacts. Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility will not be installing any signs unless required by the FCC. Lighting According to the ACC 18.48.100(G), the following outlines the lighting requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: 1. Freestanding' support structures shall not he vli icially lighted, unless 1'equhed by the F1LA of olhel' 7pplic7blC 7ulhol'lly. Any proposed lightllg' sh711 he submitted at the tinge ofthe initial application. Any lighting- must be I eviemed aild approved by the city. PenzO11 14/u ele.Ss TA Lakeruid Page 9 2. Secafil y ljjhllllg used to ll�hl the equlpnlellt liaky shall he d11GCled dorrgirraud, shielded and kepi ralthill the houndvies oflhe silo. Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility will not be installing any signals and lights unless required by the FCC and /or Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Noise According to the ACC 18.48.100(I), the following outlines the noise requirements for wireless telecommunication facilities: For the pulposes of this .Section, 14AC1' roll he eonsldeiVd a C17.S.S 13, eollllnePC.171, noise soulre pulsu7lll to ITAC 173 -60 -0110. Verizon Wireless's proposed telecommunication facility will comply with all state and local ordinances regarding noise. Please see the enclosed Acoustical Study. Existing Use The subject area accommodates telecommunication facilities. Access /Circulation The site will be accessed by the existing right of entry. There are no traffic impacts associated with these types of facilities as they are unmanned and require infrequent maintenance. Federal Requirements Verizon's proposed telecommunication facility will meet or exceed current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of the Federal government with the authority to regulate towers and antennas. Verizon's site will conform to all FAA /FCC regulations, and because the maximum ERP is less than two thousand (2,000) watts and /or the height of the facility is greater than ten meters (10m), an environmental evaluation of radio frequency emissions is exempted per CFR Title 47 Part 24, Subpart E. Verizon has a license from the FCC to provide wireless telecommunication services in the Puget Sound region. Addendums • Legal Description • Copy of Pierce County Original Permit Information • Photo Simulations • NIER Report • Acoustical Study • Structural Calculations Velizon Wil Bless 7ACL7kel,nd Page 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: TAC Lakeland PROJECT ADDRESS: 5811 Panorama Drive SE Auburn, WA PROJECT A.P.N.#: 0520062013 PARCEL A, That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 6, Township 20 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Pierce County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 6, said north quarter corner bearing south 86023'27" west, a distance of 2,633,75 feet from the northeast corner of said Section 6; Thence continuing south 8602312711 west, a distance of 155.70 feet; Thence south 303613311 east, a distance of 337.04 feet to the TRUE P0114T OF BEGINNING and the northeast corner of tract herein described; Thence south 25023130" west, a distance of 213.00 feet; Thence north 60"53138" west, a distance of 200.42 feet; Thence north 2502313011 east, a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence south 64036'30" east, a distance of 200.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH an easement and right of way from the use and maintenance of an existing road 60 feet in width over and across the following described property: Government Lot 2, and Government Lot 3, Section 6, Township 20 North, Range 5 East, in Pierce County, Washington, and over the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Pierce County, Washington. PARCEL B: Tract C, View Ridge, according to the plat thereof recorded under Recording Number 200012155002, in Pierce County, Washington. TAC LAKELAND PROPOSED NORTHEAST ELEVATION i% We never stop working for your EXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION 11 °�'�;7s-�rcNs TAC LAKELAND verfZmwiretass PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION We never stop working for you. EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION .. ,y . � - - ^vellzmwimlass W never stop working y <� a� .d» .. ,y . � - - ^vellzmwimlass W never stop working y <� A* 4 IJ ` d✓ n , NON - IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION 91 1u00I91Ipn lil!9� iaV °9nlfi�uh� lu ^lyJ ��'dll,� �m�4'ul1¢N,�Inf +11,Rd� o "IVPNIII�, °Iti.m !gl�'��1'p,�Wlllillh��' veri g p �0, wireless �llf lll'ti41!li'hl �I,Imudi,, SITE NAME: TAC Lakeland SITE ADDRESS: 5811 Panorama Dr SE Auburn, WA 98092 DATE: June 8, 2009 PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. PROJECT The proposed Verizon Wireless project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located 5811 Panorama Dr SE, Auburn, WA 98092, King County Tax Parcel 052006013. The planned improvements include antennas mounted on an existing lattice tower with supporting BTS (Base Transmission System) radio equipment located in an equipment shelter near the base of the tower. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: Cellular & PCS Antennas: Antel BXA- 70063/8CF Antel BXA- 80063/8CF 5° Antel BXA 185063/8CF 6° Sectors: 3 (alpha = 50 °, beta = 160 °, gamma = 2700) Max Power: 500 watts per Verizon RF Data Sheet Antenna Rad Centers: 88' AGL CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97 -01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that "for a truly worst -case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground -level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four -fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density ". Therefore the following equation is used: S = EIRP/TrR2 Where S = power density (mW /cmz), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturers vertical pattern information using a conservative 20 dB loss below main lobe. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the tower and the power density is 0.002514 mW /cm2 with an assumed worst -case power level of 3,000 watts ERP for the lowest antenna array. This is 0.4433% of the MPE limit for the general population /uncontrolled exposure of 0.567 mW /cm2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A for the lowest frequency range. OTHER CARRIER The following are examples of wireless carriers providing service in King County: ESMR 851 -866 Mhz Nextel Cellular 869 -894 Mhz AT &T, Verizon PCs > 1800 Mhz Sprint, T- Mobile, AT &T Nextel facilities will have potentially higher power levels than cellular or PCs facilities. In order to develop a "worst case prediction ", it is assumed that Nextel facilities are currently on the building with maximum effective radiated power (ERP) levels of 3,000 watts per sector verses 2,000 watts or less for cellular or PCs facilities. Wireless facility antennas are highly directional and project the majority of the RF energy horizontally. Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the referenced power density formula. These calculations assume that the vertical patterns of the antennas suppress the ERP by 20dbB towards the antenna base. The calculations show that the maximum total MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the tower is 0.003147mW /cm2 with the carrier operating at a total ERP of 3,000 watts per sector. This is 0.5551 % of the MPE limit for the general population /uncontrolled exposure of 0.567 mW /cm2 for the lowest Nextel frequency (851/1500) as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A. COLOCATED FACILITIES TOTAL RIPE The combined MPE for the Verizon Wireless and existing carriers using "worst case" calculations is: 0.002514 mW /cm2 +0.003147 mW /cm2 = 0.005661 mW /cm2 Total MPE. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Routine environmental evaluation is required if the PCS broadband facility is less than 10 m (32.81 feet) AGL and has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,000W ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. As the proposed antennas lowest point above ground level is 25.6 m (84 feet), the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population /uncontrolled exposure near the tower, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to access the tower for maintenance operations. Verizon Wireless and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational /controlled limits. CONCLUSIONS Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and county guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. EXIHIBITS • MPE Calculations • Antenna Data Sheets • WCF Location Map TH 1 0- "CISTE A L TAC Lakeland MPE Calculations Effective tower height assumes a person 6 R tall, tower main beam De heighl(ft) 2 61E -0 3 � height, hypotenuse 0.002514 max power density in mW /C" y U.4433% of slendaM horiz Dist„ x Note: 0,687 mW /cm= Is 100% of allowable standard for lowest frequency effective radiation lower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below horL disL hyplonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobo minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) length (km) length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW /cm^2 88 62 90 20 0.000 82.000 0.025 2499.360 300(1 04,77 44.77 46,93 49331.15 2,61E -03 TOTAL 2.69E 03 TAC Lakeland Other Carriers MPE Calculations Effective lower height assumes a person 6 ft tall. tower main beam varies hel9ht ft) 3.16E -03 height, hypotenuse 0.003147 Imax power density in mw/cm y 0.W1% le2rconlego of standard horiz Dist., x Note: 0.667 mW /cmx Is 100% of allowable standard for lowest Nexlel frequency effective radiation lower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below horiz dial. hyptonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse mein lobe mein lobe minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feel) length (km) length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW /cm 12 115 109 90 20 0.000 109.000 0.033 3322.320 3000 64.77 44.77 46.93 49331.16 1.42E -03 105 99 90 20 0.000 99.000 0.030 3017,520 3000 64,77 44.77 46.93 49331.15 1.72E -03 TOTAL 3,16E -03 Mechanical specifications Length 1238 mm 48.8 in Width 154 mm 6.1 in Depth 80 mm 3.2 in Depth with t- bracket 108 mm 4.3 in °I Weight 4.5 kg 10.0 Ibs Wind Area Polarization Slant 145* Fore /Aft 0.19 m2 2.1 ft2 Side 0.10 m2 1.1 ft2 Rated Wind Velocity (Safety factor 2.0) >322 km /hr >200 mph Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 km /hr) Fore /Aft 288 N 65 Ibs Side 170 N 38 Ibs Antenna consisting of aluminum alloy with brass feedlines covered by a UV safe fiberglass radome. Mounting and Downtilting Mounting brackets attach to a pipe diameter of 050 -102 mm (2.0 -4.0 in). Mounting bracket kit #26799997 Downtilt bracket kit #26799999 The downtilt bracket kit includes the mounting bracket kit. Electrical specifications Frequency Range 1850 -1990 MHz Impedance 5052 3) Connector(s) NE or E -DIN 2 ports / center 1) VSWR s 1.4:1 Polarization Slant 145* 1) Isolation Between Ports < -30 dB 1) Gain 18.5 dBi 2) Power Rating 250 W 1) Half Power Angle H -Plane 63° E -Plane 7° 1) Electrical Downtilt 6° 1) Null Fill 5% Lightning Protection Direct Ground BXA- 185063/8CF Radiation pattern') -1D re m M i "'-0 .1m AM \ � -n ffi mcns o M 9 Im In IV ,m m Horizontal •1D -m � � •A -iv / \. m/ to M 10 l i 41 m ® � Vertical Radiation patterns for all antennas are measured with the antenna mounted on a fiberglass pole. Mounting on a metal pole will typically improve the Front -to -Back ratio. When ordering replace =" with connector type, Amphenol Antei's Exclusive 3T (True Transmission Line Technology) nolagy Antenna Design: • Watercut brass feedline assembly for consistent performance. • Unique feedline design eliminates the need for conventional solderjoints in the signal path. • A non - collinear system with access to every radiating element for broad band- width and superior performance. • Air as insulation for virtually no internal signal loss. This Amphenol Antel antenna is under a five- year limited warranty for repair or replacement. Antenna available with center -fed connectors only. Patented Dipole Design: U.S. Patent No. 6,597,324 82 1) Typical values. � �.. .)' 4,k C,I &tlfY- i"~d 2 Power rating limited by connector only. 3) NE indicates an elongated N connector. indicates elongated D4e weight listed abae does not include the brackeweight k9 Improvements to mechanical andlor electrical performance v, ''flg i� yy of the antenna may be made without notice. Amphenol Antel, Inc. 1300 Capital Drive Rockford, Illinois 61109 USA Tel. (815) 399 -0001 Revision Date: 7111107 Toll -Free (888) 417 -9562 Fax. (815) 399 -0156 antel@antelinc.com www.antelinc.com MechanicM specifications Length 2405 mm 94.6 in Width 285 mm 11.2 in Radiation- pattern, Depth 114 mrn 4.5 in Depth with z-bracket 154 mm 6.1 in -1 --:!n._-70 no Weight 4) 10.9 kg 24.0 lbs -130-120 , _50 - 140.'' 14 " 9 -,O Wind Area Fore/Aft 0.69 M2 7.4 ft2 Wind Area Side 0.27 M2 3.0 ft2 Vf Max Wind Survivability >201 km/hr >125 mph .170 AD 00: 1 Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 km/hr) 170 10 Fore/Aft 1038 N 233 Ibf :) 0 20 Side 502 N 113 Ibf 160 30 140 40 Antenna consisting of aluminum alloy with 130 120 60 50 brass feedlines covered by a gray, UV safe - 90 �D fiberglass radome. RoHS compliant. Horizontal -7 Mounting & Downtilting -120 -110 .130 Mounting hardware attaches to pipe diameter -140,' AD 050-160 mm; 02.0-6.3 in. .150, " \'.1 - Mechanical downtilt angle 0-17* 'n°' 20 Mounting Bracket Kit 36210002.. 0 Downtilt Bracket Kit 36114003 i ISO', Electrical specifications 140", 40 130 so Frequency Range 806-900 MHz* 120 Impedance 500 100 90 90 Vertical Connector 3) NE or E-DIN Female 2 ports I Center Radiation patterns for all antennas VSWR 1) < 1.41 are measured with the antenna Polarization Slant ±45' mounted on a fiberglass pole. Isolation Between Ports') < -30 dB Gain 1) 16 dBd Mounting on a metal pole will typi- cally improve the front-to-back Power Rating 2) 500 W ratio. Half Power Angle') Horizontal Beamwidth 63' Vertical Beamwidth 7- Electrical downtift 5) 50 Null fill') 5% Lightning protection Direct ground This antenna is also available for MEN frequencies 806-941 Patented Dipole Design: U.S. Patent No. 6,608,600 B2 MHz. Specify when ordering. 1) Typical values. 2) Power rating limited by connector only. 3) NE indicates an elongated N connector. E-DIN indicates an elongated DIN connector. 4) Antenna weight does not Include brackets. 5) Add'I downtilts may be available. Check website for details. Improvements to nxxhaniml andlor eledrical performance of the antenna may be made wIlhout notice. 815.399.0001 e antel@antelinc.com www.antelinc.com BXA-80063/8CF 50 When ordering replace "—"with connector type. Featuring our Exclusive W 3T TechnologyTm maul Antenna Design: 109y • Watercut brass feedline assembly for consistent performance. • Unique feedline design eliminates the need for conventional solder joints in the signal path. • A non-collinear system with access to every radiating element for broad band- width and superior performance. • Air as insulation for virtually no internal signal loss. Warranty: This antenna is under a five-year limited warranty for repair or replacement. ),Cmp_1e_ 110' 1, Inc. 1 of I yIIIII�Yi Y 1 NuuuVl . ' ' y",.!I 1 mIII III�' ywMllllllll�lll 'FI"'M�W'T!illrllip�'!I iIPP� echanlc ,tl specifications Length 2405 mm 94.6 in Width 285 mm 11.2 in Depth 114 mm 4.5 in R adir)tic)n- patterry Depth with z- bracket 154 mm 6.1 in 750 MI Iz Weight 4) 10.9 kg 24.0 Ibs a °''° ° Wind Area Fore /Aft 0.69 m2 7.4 ft' Wind Area Side 0.27 mz 3.0 W AW, '° Max Wind Survivability >201 km/hr >125 mph p Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 km /hr) Fore /Aft 1038 N 233 Ibf " °' ° Side 502 N 113 IV 6P' +�• '�,• x,30 Antenna consisting of aluminum alloy with >n brass feedlines covered by a UV safe fiber- glass radome. Horizontal •f3D LO Mounting 8r Downtilting Mounting hardware attaches to pipe diameter „ °,' a,- ,X., ° 050 -160 mm; 02.0 -6.3 in Mechanical downtilt angle 0 -17° Mounting Bracket Kit 36210002 ° Downtilt Bracket Kit 36114003 „o , ;° DD Electrical .a l ec'i ica ion Vertical Frequency Range 696 -900 MHz 850 MHZ Impedance 500 Connector 3) NE or E -DIN Female ~ D °' ^ , -3D 2 ports / Center \ p VSWR �) s 1.4:1 ° 'ss3a M n n m m a D faD, yY`" Polarization Slant ±45' Isolation Between Ports 1) < -30 dB Gain') 16 dBd Power Rating 2) 500 W Half Power Angle 1) Horizontal Horizontal Beamwidth 63° -70 Vertical Beamwidth 70 -ta0 -0D Electrical downtih 5) 0° Null fill 1) 5% Lightning protection Direct ground �j bs •'� ° ' '° '° e D Patented Dipole Design: U.S. Patent No. 6,606,600 B2 1) Typical values. 2) Power rating limited by connector only. 30 sP 3) NE indicates an elongated N connector. ;n w E -DIN indicates an elongated DIN connector. Do Do 4) Antenna weight does not Include brackets. Vertical 5) Add'I downtilts may be available. Check websile for details. Improvements to mechani®f anNw elacWr W performance of tho enlonr,s i may be made wtthoul notice. 815.399.0001 antel@antelinc.com In www.antelinc.com . BXA- 70063/8CF _ When ordering replace "—'with connector type. Featuring our Exclusive 3T Technology7m Antenna Design: hnology • Watercut brass feedline assembly for consistent performance. • Unique feedline design eliminates the need for conventional solder joints in the signal path. • A non - collinear system with access to every radiating element for broad band- width and superior performance. • Air as insulation for virtually no internal signal loss. Warranty: This antenna is under a five -year limited warranty for repair or replacement. rniphe n Dl nc. 1 [)f awry tf za t �SlQ„a 7A C Zi 1, �- =�`°�� p��- ��} � ��.,' Wit'` Z {,�- �k'��anq► r_ - in, I ` K i'�3' R �{ � f ��x.,,,�.� �^•" 1 { t� rY Q white a I POM i Park ' er ark pacitil 4-Ai '4 A 1 Ott{ t 1,167 AV � 1I C # i rtx{ tz 1: r° F- A1 4 Sum�Bl' '1 �� 1, 4!Z562pfl a- N 122.' f. r . °€ 1 JLJ { �i Pifer ;rtl {� R1! _ \ CO light i 9ht p ti (D and (p{ 119849-2 0 tract, Attes iYOnh q �n9 *t 111 � Queen Corp oration .�or ifs sUP -ni of Tale Ate s' /Right of CanQ rights Q sacs night fer Q 9 and dl GOSOh anO.Iyq and N TN� ZQ��M ihfs gsaryad 'l trade ife rrlarks oYfYAQOr�20pS Tae Ater North gmnfarinet/on and' Inc. Ail 9hts rresee ai T t fro n I. Can role j SSAStewart Ait Aflaoua June 11, 2009 Ms. Tiffany Murray Cornerstone Engineering 16928 Woodinville Redmond Road NE Suite 210 Woodinville, VVA98O72 Re: Acouatica|Repod— VorizonTACLake|and 8Ug: 5811 Panorama Drive SE, Auburn, VVA9O092 Dear Tiffany, This report presents a noise survey performed in the irnnned|aho vicinity of the proposed Verizon telecommunications facility at 5811 Panorama Drive 8E in Auburn. Washington. This noise survey extends from the proposed equipment to the nearest properties. The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions and the impacts of the acoustical changes due to the proposed equipment. This report contains data on the existing and predicted noise environments, impact criteria and an evaluation of the predicted G0UOd |eva|o as they relate to the criteria. Ambient Conditions Existing ambient noise levels were measured on site with a Larson-Davis 82Osound level meter on June SLh'2OO8. Measurements were conducted aa close to the proposed location as pOSS|b|e and the property lines in accordance with the State of Washington nOd8 for Maximum Environmental Noise Leve|aVVAC 173-60-020. The average ambient noise level was 47 dBA, due primarily to birds chirping. The weather during the measurements was clear and the roads were dry. Code Requirements The site is located within the City of Auburn Zoning jurisdiction. The site is on F!-1 Single Family Residential property. All of the receiving properties are Residential. The proposed new equipment includes equipment support cabinets and an emergency generator. The equipment support cabinets are expected to run 24 hours a day. The generator will run once o week during d8yUno8 hours for maintenance and testing purposes only. According to Auburn City Code Chapter 18.48.100.1. vvir8|0Gs C0nnrnuDiC8dOn facilities are considered Class B. Cummercie|, noise source pursuant toVVAC 173-60. The surrounding Residential properties are Class A receivers under VVAC173-0O. Under WAC 173-60, noise from equipment on a Class A EDNA property is limited as follows: SSA Acoustics, UP Seattle, Washington 98109 C~206~839.0819 f. 206.839.0824 Verizon Wireless TAC Lakeland Class B EDNA Receiver: Noise is limited to 57 dBA during daytime hours. During nighttime hours, between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., the maximum permissible sound level is decreased by 10 decibels. Since the support cabinets are expected to operate 24 hours a day, they must meet the 47 dBA nighttime limit. Additionally, WAC 173 -60 -040 allows that during any one -hour period, the maximum permissible noise level may be exceeded by 5 dBA for a 15 minute period. Therefore, the generator must not exceed 62 dBA when running during daytime hours for maintenance testing. The generator is exempt during emergency operation. Predicted Equipment Sound Levels 24 -Hour Operation Equipment The proposed 24 -hour equipment includes three Lucent Modcell 4.0 outdoor radio cabinets, one Emerson EBRE battery cabinet, and one Emerson HPRE power cabinet. According to manufacturer data, the Lucent Modcell 4.06 has a sound power level of 65 dBA which is equivalent to a sound pressure level of 54 dBA at a distance of 5 feet. The Emerson EBRE cabinet produces a sound pressure level of 58 dBA at a distance of 5 feet. The Emerson HPRE cabinet produces a sound pressure level of 70 dBA at a distance of 5 feet. The total sound pressure level from all six new and future cabinets will be 70 dBA at 5 feet. To predict equipment noise levels at the receiving properties, this survey used the methods established by ARI Standard 275 -97. Application factors such as location, height, and reflective surfaces are accounted for in predicting the sound level at the nearest receivers. The proposed equipment is to be located in an 8'x18' fibrebond Verizon equipment shelter. Based on the shelter drawings, we can estimate that it will provide at least 15 dBA of noise reduction. The nearest receiving property is approximately 90 feet southeast of the equipment location. The predicted sound level at the nearest property is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 Application Factors and Predicted Noise Levels Proposed New Equipment As shown in Table 1, the combined sound pressure level from the proposed equipment cabinets at the nearest receiving property is 30 dBA which meets the 47 dBA code limit. No further noise mitigation will be necessary. Page 2 Line 1 Applicatio or Combined Sound Pressure Level at 5 ft. (dBA), Lpl 70 2 Distance Factor (DF) Inverse-Square Law Free Field): DF = 20lo d1 /d2 -25 90ft 3 Noise reduction from Shelter -15 4 New Equipment Sound Pressure Level at Receiver, Lpr Add lines 1 - 3 30 As shown in Table 1, the combined sound pressure level from the proposed equipment cabinets at the nearest receiving property is 30 dBA which meets the 47 dBA code limit. No further noise mitigation will be necessary. Page 2 Verizon Wireless TAC Lakeland HVAC Eauipment The proposed equipment shelter is to be cooled by two Marvair AVP36 air - conditioning units which each produce a 70 dBA at 5 feet. These units operate as a "lead /lag" system with only one unit operating at a time. The HVAC units are to be located on the north and south ends of the proposed shelter. The nearest receiving property line is approximately 90 feet southeast of the generator location. The predicted sound level at the north property is shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 Application Factors and Predicted Noise Levels for the Pro nosed HVAC E ui ment Line ApplicationlVactor 1 Combined Sound Pressure Level at 23 ft. (dBA), L 1 70 2 Distance Factor (DF) -25 3 Inverse - Square Law Free Field): DF = 20lo dl /d2 90ft 3 New Equipment Sound Pressure Level at Receiver, Lpr Add lines 1 - 3 45 As shown in Table 3, the sound pressure level from the proposed HVAC equipment will be 45 dBA at the nearest property line, which complies with the 47 dBA noise code. No further noise mitigation will be necessary. Emergency Equipment The proposed emergency backup equipment is a 50kW Diesel Generator. According to manufacturer specifications, this generator produces a sound pressure level of 65 dBA at a distance of 23 feet. The generator is to be located on the proposed concrete pad within the Verizon equipment compound, but not in the shelter. The nearest property line is approximately 90 feet southeast of the generator location. The predicted sound level at the nearest receiving property is shown in Table 3 below. Table 3 Application Factors and Predicted Noise Levels for the Pro osed Generator As shown in Table 3, the sound pressure level from the proposed emergency generator will be 53 dBA at the nearest receiving property line, which complies with the 62 dBA 15- minute noise limit. No further noise mitigation will be necessary. 'age 3 Line 1 Applicatfon Factor Combined Sound Pressure Level at 23 ft. (dBA), L 1 SE 65 2 Distance Factor (DF) Inverse-Square Law Free Field): DF = 20lo (dl/d2)90ft -12 3 New Equipment Sound Pressure Level at Receiver, Lpr Add lines 1 - 2 53 As shown in Table 3, the sound pressure level from the proposed emergency generator will be 53 dBA at the nearest receiving property line, which complies with the 62 dBA 15- minute noise limit. No further noise mitigation will be necessary. 'age 3 Veriaon Wireless TAC Lakeland Please contact us if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, SSA Acoustics, LLP Joel sseistrom Senior Technician Reviewed y, 4a� Burt Acoustical Consultant Page 4 Structural Analysis Report Structure : 98.2 ft Self Supported.Tower ATC Site Name : Auburn WA, WA ATC Site Number : 89523 Proposed Carrier : Verizon Carrier Site Name : TAC Lakeland Carrier Site Number : TAC Lakeland County : Pierce Eng. Number : 42680223 Date : June 1, 2009* Usage : 49% Legs, 720/o Diagonals, 51% Horizontals Submitted by: Zachary A, Medoff Design Engineer American Tower Engineering Services 400 Regency Forest Drive Cary, NC 27518 Phone: 919 -468 -0112 WASy��,G�� >o h (a 2I a2214 Eng. Number 42680223 June 1, 2009 Page 2 Results The maximum structure usage is: 72% Leg Forces Current Analysis Reactions Uplift (Kips) 39.7 Axial (Kips) 54.3 Shear Ki s 9.5 The structure base reactions resulting from this analysis were found to be acceptable through analysis based on geotechnical and foundation information, therefore no modification or reinforcement of the foundation will be required. Conclusion Based on the analysis results, the structure meets the requirements per ANSI /TIA/EIA -222 -F and 2006 IBC standards. The tower and foundation can support the existing and proposed antennas with the TX line distribution as described in this report. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call 919- 465 -6535. Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Loads: 80 mph no ice 69 mph w/ 1/2" radial ice 50 mph no ice Job Information Tower: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/BA -222 Rev F Shape :Triangle Base Width: 21.00 ft Client: Verizon Top Width: 5.50 ft Vert 54.26 k Total Down 12.72 k Horiz 9.48 k Total Shear 15.66 k Discrete Appurtenance Bev Sections Properties From Section Leg Members Diagonal Members Horizontal Members 1 PLA50ksi SAW 10" x 0.5" DAE 36ksi 2X2X0.25 SPE 36ksi 3X3X0.1875 2-3 PLA50ksi SAW 10" x 0.5" DAE 36ksi 2X2X0.125 SPE 36ksi 2.5X2.5X0.1875 4 - 5 PLA50ksi SAW 9" x 0.375" DAE 36ksi 2)(2X0.125 SAE 36ksi 2.5X2.5X0.1875 6 PLA50ksi SAW 8" x 025" DAE 36ksi 2)(2X0.125 SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.1875 7 PLA50ksi SAW 8" x 0.25" DAE 36ksi 1.75X1.75X0.1875 SAE 36ksi 2)(2X0.25 8 PLA50ksi SAW 7" x 0.25" DAE 36ksi 1.75XI.75X0.1875 SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.25 9 PLA50ksi SAW 7" x 025" SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.1875 SAE 36ksi 2X2X025 10-13 PLA50ksi SAW 7" x 025" SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.1875 SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.125 14 PLA50ksi SAW 7" X 3116" SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.1875 Dish 15 PLA50ksi SAW 7" X 3116" SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.1875 SAE 36ksi 2X2X0.125 Vert 54.26 k Total Down 12.72 k Horiz 9.48 k Total Shear 15.66 k Discrete Appurtenance Bev From (ft) Type Qty Description 98.00 Straight Arm 1 Side Arm with Pipe 98.00 Straight Arm 1 Side Arm with Pipe 98.00 Other 1 Heat Disperser 98.00 Other 1 Heat Disperser 98.00 Whip 2 Jampro JMPC -2 91.00 Whip 1 Pipe Extension 88.00 Panel 6 Clearcomm 85011900 88.00 Mounting Frame 3 Sector Frames 88.00 Panel 3 Ante[ BXA- 185063/8CF 88.00 Panel 3 Ante[ BXA- 80063 18CF 88.00 Panel 3 Ante[ BXA-70063 18CF 50.00 Dish 1 Gabriel P- 9A48G + -U Linear Appurtenance Bev (ft) From To Qty Description 0.000 98.000 1 Climbing Ladder 0.000 98.000 1 1 518" Coax 0.000 88.000 1 Wave Guide 0.000 88.000 12 718" Coax 0.000 50.000 1 718" Coax Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Site Number: 89523 Y 6/1/2009 1:47:56 PM Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F X Gh : 1.16 Section Forces LoadCase 90 deg No Ice 80.00 mph Wind at 90 deg From Face with No Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 LoadCase Normal Ice 69.28 mph Wind Normal To Face with Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 Wind Sect Height Seq (ft) qz Total Total Ice Sol Ratio Eff Area Cf DF Dr Rr (sqft) Linear Area (sgft) Ice Linear Area (sqft) Ice Struct Force (lb) Linear Force (I b) Total Force (I b) Eff Face 15 97.21 16.73 3.36 Wind Flat Round Round 4.37 0.00 Eff Linear Linear Total 0.00 Struct Linear Total 5.73 Sect Height Area Area Area Sol 0.00 Area Area Area Weight Weight Force Force Force Eff Seq (ft) qz (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) Ratio Cf DF Dr Rr (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) (I b) Ice (lb) (lb) (lb) (I b) Face 15 97.21 22.31 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.31 2.28 0.85 1.00 0.62 2.86 0.00 0.00 117.6 0.0 169.22 0.00 169.22 2 14 93.92 22.09 5.73 0.00 0.00 0.23 2.51 0.85 1.00 0.60 4.87 0.00 0.00 201.6 0.0 313.71 0.00 313.71 2 13 90.48 21.86 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.32 0.85 1.00 0.61 3.12 0.00 0.00 138.3 0.0 184.23 0.00 184.23 2 12 87.37 21.64 5.18 2.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 0.85 1.00 0.62 5.67 0.00 0.00 224.9 0.0 323.46 0.00 323.46 1 11 83.27 21.34 6.00 3.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 0.85 1.00 0.62 6.99 0.00 0.00 262.0 0.0 392.96 0.00 392.96 1 10 78.71 21.00 6.77 3.43 0.00 0.28 2.35 0.85 1.00 0.61 7.85 0.00 0.00 294.8 0.0 451.66 0.00 451.66 1 9 73.62 20.61 7.53 3.79 0.00 0.25 2.44 0.85 1.00 0.60 8.68 0.00 0.00 363.6 0.0 507.27 0.00 507.27 1 8 67.98 20.14 8.04 4.23 0.00 0.22 2.52 0.85 1.00 0.60 9.36 0.00 0.00 485.2 0.0 552.23 0.00 552.23 1 7 61.67 19.59 9.49 4.73 0.00 0.21 2.55 0.85 1.00 0.59 10.88 0.00 0.00 555.6 0.0 633.28 0.00 633.28 1 6 54.65 18.92 13.00 5.24 0.00 0.22 2.54 0.85 1.00 0.59 14.16 0.00 0.00 630.4 0.0 790.85 0.00 790.85 1 5 46.81 18.11 15.82 6.55 0.00 0.21 2.56 0.85 1.00 0.59 17.33 0.00 0.00 851.6 0.0 934.37 0.00 934.37 1 4 38.02 17.06 17.76 7.44 0.00 0.19 2.63 0.85 1.00 0.59 19.47 0.00 0.00 955.0 0.0 1,016.72 0.00 1,016.72 1 3 28.38 16.38 20.18 8.01 0.00 0.18 2.68 0.85 1.00 0.59 21.84 0.00 0.00 1,205.8 0.0 1,114.75 0.00 1,114.75 1 2 17.69 16.38 28.59 9.11 0.00 0.18 2.65 0.85 1.00 0.59 29.65 0.00 0.00 1,744.2 0.0 1,497.66 0.00 1,497.66 1 1 6.00 16.38 31.81 9.61 0.00 0.17 2.69 0.85 1.00 0.59 32.66 0.00 0.00 2,360.5 0.0 1,674.79 0.00 1,674.79 1 10,391.1 0.0 10,557.16 LoadCase Normal Ice 69.28 mph Wind Normal To Face with Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 Wind Sect Height Seq (ft) qz Total Flat Area (sqft) Total Round Area (sqft) Ice Round Area (sqft) Sol Ratio Eff Area Cf DF Dr Rr (sqft) Linear Area (sgft) Ice Linear Area (sqft) Total Weight Weight (I b) Ice (lb) Struct Force (lb) Linear Force (I b) Total Force (I b) Eff Face 15 97.21 16.73 3.36 1.51 1.51 0.44 1.991.00 1.00 0.67 4.37 0.00 0.00 191.5 73.8 169.00 0.00 169.00 2 14 93.92 16.57 5.73 2.34 2.34 0.32 2.241.00 1.00 0.62 7.18 0.00 0.00 300.5 98.9 310.66 0.00 310.66 2 13 90.48 16.39 3.68 1.63 1.63 0.42 2.02 1.00 1.00 0.66 4.75 0.00 0.00 216.6 78.3 183.42 0.00 183.42 2 12 87.37 16.23 5.18 5.84 3.79 0.48 1.931.00 1.00 0.69 9.18 0.00 0.00 366.6 141.6 335.28 0.00 335.28 1 11 83.27 16.01 6.00 8.09 5.04 0.49 1.92 1.00 1.00 0.69 11.59 0.00 0.00 441.9 179.9 414.03 0.00 414.03 1 10 78.71 15.75 6.77 9.11 5.68 0.43 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 12.84 0.00 0.00 497.3 202.5 470.89 0.00 470.89 1 9 73.62 15.45 7.53 10.07 6.28 0.39 2.09 1.00 1.00 0.65 14.04 0.00 0.00 588.1 224.5 526.99 0.00 526.99 1 8 67.98 15.11 8.04 11.21 6.98 0.35 2.17 1.00 1.00 0.63 15.14 0.00 0.00 765.3 280.0 577.13 0.00 577.13 1 7 61.67 14.69 9.49 12.50 7.77 0.33 2.22 1.00 1.00 0.63 17.31 0.00 0.00 866.2 310.6 657.61 0.00 657.61 1 6 54.65 14.19 13.00 13.86 8.63 0.32 2.241.00 1.00 0.62 21.63 0.00 •0.00 1,058.5 428.1 800.33 0.00 800.33 1 5 46.81 13.58 15.82 16.87 10.32 0.31 2.271.00 1.00 0.62 26.25 0.00 0.00 1,354.4 502.9 943.15 0.00 943.15 1 4 38.02 12.79 17.76 19.09 11.65 0.28 2.361.00 1.00 0.61 29.39 0.00 0.00 1,520.1 565.1 1,031.37 0.00 1,031.37 1 3 28.38 12.29 20.18 20.63 12.62 0.26 2.421.00 1.00 0.60 32.62 0.00 0.00 1,821.8 616.0 1,129.56 0.00 1,129.56 1 2 17.69 12.29 28.59 23.43 14.33 0.25 2.431.00 1.00 0.60 42.72 0.00 0.00 2,637.1 892.9 1,481.05 0.00 1,481.05 1 1 6.00 12.29 31.81 24.86 15.25 0.24 2.481.00 1.00 0.60 46.69 0.00 0.00 3,353.6 993.1 1,654.99 0.00 1,654.99 1 15,979.4 5,588.3 10,685.46 Page 2 Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Site Number: 89523 Y 6/1/2009 1:47:56 PM Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIAIEIA -222 Rev F X Gh : 1.16 Section Forces LoadCase Normal 50.00 mph Wind Normal To Face with No Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 LoadCase 60 deg 50.00 mph Wind at 60 deg From Face with No Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 Total Total Ice Ice Wind Flat Round Round Eff Linear Linear Total Struct Linear Total Sect Height Area Area Area Sol Area Area Area Weight Weight Force Force Force Eff Seq (ft) qz (sgft) (sqft) (sqft) Ratio Cf Df Dr Rr (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) (lb) Ice (lb) (lb) (I b) (I b) Face 15 97.21 8.71 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.31 2.28 1.00 1.00 0.62 3.36 0.00 0.00 117.6 0.0 77.77 0.00 77.77 2 14 93.92 8.63 5.73 0.00 0.00 0.23 2.51 1.00 1.00 0.60 5.73 0.00 0.00 201.6 0.0 144.17 0.00 144.17 2 13 90.48 8.54 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.32 1.00 1.00 0.61 3.68 0.00 0.00 138.3 0.0 84.66 0.00 84.66 2 12 87.37 8.45 5.18 2.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 1.00 1.00 0.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 224.9 0.0 143.65 0.00 143.65 1 11 83.27 8.34 6.00 3.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 1.00 1.00 0.62 7.89 0.00 0.00 262.0 0.0 173.27 0.00 173.27 1 10 78.71 8.20 6.77 3.43 0.00 0.28 2.35 1.00 1.00 0.61 8.86 0.00 0.00 294.8 0.0 199.27 0.00 199.27 1 9 73.62 8.05 7.53 3.79 0.00 0.25 2.44 1.00 1.00 0.60 9.81 0.00 0.00 363.6 0.0 223.94 0.00 223.94 1 8 67.98 7.87 8.04 4.23 0.00 0.22 2.52 1.00 1.00 0.60 10.56 0.00 0.00 485.2 0.0 243.53 0.00 243.53 1 7 61.67 7.65 9.49 4.73 0.00 0.21 2.55 1.00 1.00 0.59 12.30 0.00 0.00 555.6 0.0 279.76 0.00 279.76 1 6 54.65 7.39 13.00 5.24 0.00 0.22 2.541.00 1.00 0.59 16.11 0.00 0.00 630.4 0.0 351.46 0.00 351.46 1 5 46.81 7.07 15.82 6.55 0.00 0.21 2.561.00 1.00 0.59 19.70 0.00 0.00 851.6 0.0 414.96 0.00 414.96 1 4 38.02 6.66 17.76 7.44 0.00 0.19 2.631.00 1.00 0.59 22.14 0.00 0.00 955.0 0.0 451.48 0.00 451.48 1 3 28.38 6.40 20.18 8.01 0.00 0.18 2.681.00 1.00 0.59 24.87 0.00 0.00 1,205.8 0.0 495.79 0.00 495.79 1 2 17.69 6.40 28.59 9.11 0.00 0.18 2.651.00 1.00 0.59 33.94 0.00 0.00 1,744.2 0.0 669.64 0.00 669.64 1 1 6.00 6.40 31.81 9.61 0.00 0.17 2.691.00 1.00 0.59 37.43 0.00 0.00 2,360.5 0.0 749.78 0.00 749.78 1 10,391.1 0.0 4,703.13 LoadCase 60 deg 50.00 mph Wind at 60 deg From Face with No Ice Allow Stress Inc: 1.333 Dead LF: 1.000 Wind LF: 1.000 Page 4 Total Total Ice Ice Wind Flat Round Round Eff Linear Linear Total Struct Linear Total Sect Height Area Area Area Sol Area Area Area Weight Weight Force Force Force Eff Seq (ft) qz (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) Ratio Cf Df Dr Rr (sqft) (sqft) (sqft) (lb) Ice (lb) (lb) (lb) (I b) Face 15 97.21 8.71 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.31 2.28 0.80 1.00 0.62 2.69 0.00 0.00 117.6 0.0 62.21 0.00 62.21 2 14 93.92 8.63 5.73 0.00 0.00 0.23 2.51 0.80 1.00 0.60 4.58 0.00 0.00 201.6 0.0 115.34 0.00 115.34 2 13 90.48 8.54 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.32 0.80 1.00 0.61 2.94 0.00 0.00 138.3 0.0 67.73 0.00 67.73 2 12 87.37 8.45 5.18 2.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 0.80 1.00 0.62 5.42 0.00 0.00 224.9 0.0 120.59 0.00 120.59 1 11 83.27 8.34 6.00 3.05 0.00 0.31 2.26 0.80 1.00 0.62 6.69 0.00 0.00 262.0 0.0 146.91 0.00 146.91 1 10 78.71 8.20 6.77 3.43 0.00 0.28 2.35 0.80 1.00 0.61 7.51 0.00 0.00 294.8 0.0 168.82 0.00 168.82 1 9 73.62 8.05 7.53 3.79 0.00 0.25 2.44 0.80 1.00 0.60 8.30 0.00 0.00 363.6 0.0 189.56 0.00 189.56 1 8 67.98 7.87 8.04 4.23 0.00 0.22 2.52 0.80 1.00 0.60 8.95 0.00 0.00 485.2 0.0 206.44 0.00 206.44 1 7 61.67 7.65 9.49 4.73 0.00 0.21 2.55 0.80 1.00 0.59 10.40 0.00 0.00 555.6 0.0 236.58 0.00 236.58 1 6 54.65 7.39 13.00 5.24 0.00 0.22 2.54 0.80 1.00 0.59 13.51 0.00 0.00 630.4 0.0 294.75 0.00 294.75 1 5 46.81 7.07 15.82 6.55 0.00 0.21 2.56 0.80 1.00 0.59 16.54 0.00 0.00 851.6 0.0 348.33 0.00 348.33 1 4 38.02 6.66 17.76 7.44 0.00 0.19 2.63 0.80 1.00 0.59 18.58 0.00 0.00 955.0 0.0 379.05 0.00 379.05 1 3 28.38 6.40 20.18 8.01 0.00 0.18 2.68 0.80 1.00 0.59 20.83 0.00 0.00 1,205.8 0.0 415.34 0.00 415.34 1 2 17.69 6.40 28.59 9.11 0.00 0.18 2.65 0.80 1.00 0.59 28.22 0.00 0.00 1,744.2 0.0 556.82 0.00 556.82 1 1 6.00 6.40 31.81 9.61 0.00 0.17 2.69 0.80 1.00 0.59 31.07 0.00 0.00 2,360.5 0.0 622.36 0.00 622.36 1 10,391.1 0.0 3,930.81 Page 4 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIAIEIA -222 Rev F Tower Loading Discrete Appurtenance Properties Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 6/1/2009 1:47:56 PM X Attach Elev No Ice Ice Distance To Vert Elev Width Weight Weight CaAa CaAa Weight CaAa CaAa From Face XAngle Ecc (ft) Description Qty (lb) (sf) Factor (lb) (sf) Factor (ft) (deg) (ft) 98.00 Side Arm with Pipe 1 75.00 1.500 1.00 120.00 2.000 1.00 0.000 0.00 14.000 98.00 Side Arm with Pipe 1 75.00 1.500 1.00 120.00 2.000 1.00 0.000 0.00 5.000 98.00 Heat Disperser 1 100.00 2.000 1.00 150.00 2.500 1.00 0.000 0.00 14.000 98.00 Heat Disperser 1 100.00 2.000 1.00 150.00 2.500 1.00 0.000 0.00 5.000 98.00 Jampro JMPC -2 2 160.00 7.560 1.00 220.00 8.850 1.00 0.000 0.00 7.500 91.00 Pipe Extension 1 200.00 15.000 1.00 300.00 17.560 1.00 0.000 0:00 12.500 88.00 Clearcomm 850/1900 6 5.50 0.520 0.67 8.80 0.680 0.67 0.000 0.00 0.000 88.00 Sector Frames 3 400.00 17.900 0.75 510.00 22.200 0.75 0.000 0.00 0.000 88.00 Antel BXA- 185063/8CF 3 10.00 2.960 0.81 27.26 3.440 0.83 0.000 0.00 0.000 88.00 Antel BXA- 8006318CF 3 24.00 10.670 0.76 77.43 11.580 0.78 0.000 0.00 0.000 88.00 Antel BXA- 7006318CF 3 24.00 10.670 0.78 79.16 11.580 0.79 0.000 0.00 0.000 50.00 Gabriel P- 9A48G + -U 1 51.00 7.460 1.00 102.00 21.790 1.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 Totals 26 2328.00 Linear Appurtenance Properties 3516.35 Number of Appurtenances: 12 Elev Elev From To Width Weight Pct Spread On Bundling (ft) (tt) Description Qty (in) (lb /ft) In Wind Faces Arrangement 0.00 98.00 1 5/8" Coax 1 1.98 0.82 100.00 1 Separate 0100 98.00 Climbing Ladder 1 2.00 6.90 100.00 2 Separate 0.00 88.00 7/8" Coax 12 1.09 0.33 50.00 1 Separate 0.00 88.00 Wave Guide 1 2.00 5.00 100.00 1 Separate 0.00 50.00 7/8" Coax 1 1.09 0.33 100.00 1 Separate Page 6 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F Force /Stress Summary Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 6/112009 1:47:56 PM X Section: 3 S Bot Elev (ft): 23.38 Fy Cap Num Height (ft): 10.000 Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) Member Shear Bear LEG PLA - SAW 10" x 0.5" 28.08 60 deg No Ice Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z KL /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 10" x 0.5" -37.72 Normal No Ice 10.07 50 50 50 48.8 32.7 163.59 0 0 0.00 0.00 23 Member Z HORIZ SAE - 2.5X2.5X0.1875 -1.94 Normal No Ice 7.500 100 100 100 181.8 6.0 5.43 1 1 7.85 8.70 35 Member Z DIAG DAE - 2X2X0.125 -3.04 90 deg No Ice 13.13 50 100 25 163.4 7.5 7.16 2 2 15.71 11.60 42 Member Y Page 8 Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 10" x 0.5" 28.08 60 deg No Ice 50 199.98 0 0 0.00 0.00 14 Member HORIZ SAE- 2.5X2.5X0.1875 1.73 60 deg No Ice 36 23.10 1 1 7.85 8.70 22 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE - 2X2X0.125 2.78 90 deg No Ice 36 23.76 2 2 15.71 11.60 23 Bolt Bear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 27.83 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression 37.45 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 30.93 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 41.92 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Section: 4 S Bot Elev (ft): 33.38 Height (ft): 9.292 Member Shear Bear Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z Id.. /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % controls LEG PLA - SAW 9" x 0.375 -32.40 Normal No Ice 9.33 50 50 50 50.5 32.4 109.22 0 0 0.00 0.00 29 Member Z HORIZ SAE- 2.5X2.5X0.1875 -1.96 90 deg No Ice 6.792 100 100 100 164.6 7.3 6.62 1 1 7.85 8.70 29 Member Z DIAG DAE- 2X2X0.125 -3.46 90 deg No Ice 11.94 50 100 25 148.6 9.0 8.66 2 2 15.71 11.60 39 Member Y Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 9" x 0.375 24.00 60 deg No Ice 50 134.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 17 Member HORIZ SAE - 2.5X2.5X0.1875 2.09 90 deg No Ice 36 23.10 1 1 7.85 8.70 26 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE - 2X2X0.125 3.25 90 deg No Ice 36 23.76 2 2 15.71 11.60 28 Bolt Bear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 23.75 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression 32.10 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 27.83 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 37.45 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Page 8 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F Force /Stress Summary Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 6/1/2009 1:47:56 PM Section: 7 S Bot Elev (ft): 58.33 0.00 Height (ft): 6.667 Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Top Compression Max Tension Member (KIP) Load Case (ksi) Member Shear Bear % Controls Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z KL /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 8" x 0.25" -21.35 Normal No Ice 6.71 100 100 100 85.3 21.8 43.53 0 0 0.00 0.00 49 Member Z HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.25 -1.50 Normal No Ice 4.709 100 100 100 144.5 9.5 8.96 1 1 7.85 11.60 19 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE - 1.75X1.75X0.18 -2.39 90 deg No Ice 8.545 100 100 50 191.0 5.5 6.77 2 2 15.71 17.40 35 Member X Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension Force 0.00 Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Top Compression Max Tension Member (KIP) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 8" x 0.25" 15.11 60 deg No Ice 50 79.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 18 Member HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.25 1.38 60 deg No Ice 36 23.18 1 1 7.85 11.60 17 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE - 1.75X1.75X0.18 2.27 90 deg No Ice 36 29.84 2 2 15.71 17.40 14 Bolt Shear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 14.93 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Use Max Tension Member (KIP) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) Top Compression 21.18 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 50 69.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 16 Member HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.25 Bot Tension 17.71 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE- 1.75X1.75X0.18 2.94 90 deg No Ice 36 29.84 2 2 15.71 17.40 Bot Compression 24.45 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces Section: 8 S Bot Elev (ft): 65.00 Bolt Type Height (ft): 5.958 Top Tension 11.15 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression Member Shear Bear Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z KL /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" -16.83 Normal No Ice 5.96 100 100 100 83.7 23.9 41.80 0 0 0.00 0.00 40 Member Z HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.25 -1.74 90 deg No Ice 4.500 100 100 100 138.1 10.4 9.81 1 1 7.85 11.60 22 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE - 1.75X1.75X0.18 -3.05 90 deg No Ice 7.595 100 100 50 169.7 6.9 8.57 2 2 15.71 17.40 35 Member X Page 10 Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (KIP) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" 11.26 60 deg No Ice 50 69.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 16 Member HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.25 1.82 Normal No Ice 36 23.18 1 1 7.85 11.60 23 Bolt Shear DIAG DAE- 1.75X1.75X0.18 2.94 90 deg No Ice 36 29.84 2 2 15.71 17.40 18 Bolt Shear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 11.15 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression 16.71 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 14.93 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 21.18 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Page 10 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F Force /Stress Summary Copyright Semoan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 611/2009 1:47:56 PM 5C Section: 11 S Bot Elev (ft): 81.12 Height (ft): 4.292 Member Shear Bear Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z KL /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" -8.13 Normal No Ice 4.32 100 100 100 60.6 29.3 51.31 0 0 0.00 0.00 15 Member Z HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.125 -1.37 90 deg No Ice 3.167 100 100 100 107.7 16.0 7.66 1 1 7.85 5.80 23 Bolt Bear DIAG SAE - 2X2X0.1875 -2.25 90 deg No Ice 5.596 100 100 100 170.5 6.9 4.90 1 1 7.85 8.70 45 Member Z Page 12 Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" 3.07 60 deg No Ice 50 69.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 4 Member HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.125 1.40 90 deg No Ice 36 11.88 1 1 7.85 5.80 24 Bolt Bear DIAL SAE - 2X2X0.1875 2.19 90 deg No Ice 36 17.67 1 1 7.85 8.70 27 Bolt Shear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 2.85 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression 7.92 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 5.61 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 10.74 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Section: 12 S Bot Elev (ft): 85.42 Height (ft): 3.917 Member Shear Bear Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z KL /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" -5.41 Normal No Ice 3.95 100 100 100 55.4 30.4 53.23 0 0 0.00 0.00 10 Member Z HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.125 -1.60 90 deg No Ice 2.750 100 100 100 101.5 17.1 8.19 1 1 7.85 5.80 27 Bolt Bear DIAG SAE - 2X2X0.1875 -2.49 90 deg No Ice 5.043 100 100 100 153.6 8.4 6.03 1 1 7.85 8.70 41 Member Z Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW 7" x 0.25" 1.28 Normal No Ice 50 69.99 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 Member HORIZ SAE - 2X2X0.125 1.68 60 deg No Ice 36 11.88 1 1 7.85 5.80 29 Bolt Bear DIAG SAE- 2X2X0.1875 2.44 90 deg No Ice 36 17.67 1 1 7.85 8.70 31 Bolt Shear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 1.18 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Top Compression 5.24 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 2.85 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 7.92 Normal No Ice 0.00 0 Page 12 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F Force /Stress Summary Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 6/1/20091:47:56 PM X Section: 15 S Bot Elev (ft): 96.21 Height (ft): 2.000 Member Shear Bear Force Len Bracing % Fa Cap Num Num Cap Cap Use Max Compression Member (kip) Load Case (ft) X Y Z Ia /R (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes (kip) (kip) % Controls LEG PLA - SAW T' X 3/16" -0.39 Normal Ice 2.00 100 100 100 28.0 27.0 35.46 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 Member Z HORIZ SAE- 2X2X0.125 -1.16 Normal No Ice 2.750 100 100 100 101.5 17.1 8.19 1 1 7.85 5.80 19 Bolt Bear DIAG SAE - 2X2X0.1875 -1.13 Normal No Ice 3.400 100 100 100 111.8 15.2 10.90 1 1 7.85 8.70 14 Bolt Shear Page 14 Force Fy Cap Num Num Shear Bear Use Max Tension Member (Kip) Load Case (ksi) (kip) Bolts Holes Cap (kip) Cap (kip) % Controls LEG 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 HORIZ SAE- 2X2X0.125 0.77 60 deg No Ice 36 11.88 1 1 7.85 5.80 13 Bolt Bear DIAG SAE - 2X2X0.1875 1.09 Normal No Ice 36 17.67 1 1 7.85 8.70 13 Bolt Shear Force Capacity Use Num Max Splice Forces (kip) Load Case (kip) % Bolts Bolt Type Top Tension 0.00 0.00 0 Top Compression 0.40 90 deg Ice 0.00 0 Bot Tension 0.55 60 deg No Ice 0.00 0 Bot Compression 1.70 Normal Ice 0.00 0 Page 14 Site Number: 89523 Location: Auburn WA, WA Code: TIA/EIA -222 Rev F Deflections and Rotations Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 6/1/2009 1:47:56 PM X Page 16 Bevation Deflection Twist Sway Load Case (ft) (ft) (deg) (deg) 50.00 mph Wind Normal To Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0163 0.1865 0.0332 89.33 0.0555 0.0397 0.0657 91.63 0.0587 0.0326 0.1188 98.21 0.0677 0.0233 0.1534 50.00 mph Wind at 60 deg From Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0143 0.1568 0.0169 89.33 0.0481 0.0302 0.0761 91.63 0.0505 0.0250 0.0597 98.21 0.0573 0.0179 0.0984 50.00 mph Wind at 90 deg From Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0148 0.0954 0.0260 89.33 0.0485 0.0168 0.0809 91.63 0.0506 0.0143 0.0197 98.21 0.0570 0.0109 0.0761 69.28 mph Wind Normal To Face with Ice 50.96 0.0388 0.4211 0.0769 89.33 0.1278 0.0898 0.1500 91.63 0.1351 0.0722 0.2693 98.21 0.1557 0.0497 0.3530 69.28 mph Wind at 60 deg From Face with Ice 50.96 0.0340 0.3768 0.0406 89.33 0.1145 0.0779 0.1774 91.63 0.1203 0.0644 0.1359 98.21 0.1363 0.0470 0.2289 69.28 mph Wind at 90 deg From Face with Ice 50.96 0.0354 0.2280 0.0619 89.33 0.1145 0.0440 0.1872 91.63 0.1197 0.0374 0.0391 98.21 0.1347 0.0288 0.1762 80.00 mph Wind Normal To Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0419 0.4764 0.0857 89.33 0.1424 0.1029 0.1687 91.63 0.1506 0.0845 0.3038 98.21 0.1738 0.0611 0.3922 80.00 mph Wind at 60 deg From Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0369 0.4047 0.0439 89.33 0.1240 0.0812 0.1960 91.63 0.1300 0.0680 0.1524 98.21 0.1476 0.0509 0.2522 80.00 mph Wind at 90 deg From Face with No Ice 50.96 0.0380 0.2469 0.0674 89.33 0.1250 0.0448 0.2083 91.63 0.1304 0.0386 0.0491 98.21 0.1470 0.0301 0.1934 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Page 16 VICINITY MAP ` rn I Ave E li Q m o st c Itiver Mn1k VERIZON WIRELESS 2nd Ave SVV �T 31d '"� 1\ Are SW 3rd xve ,��y``QD Peck 4th Ave SVv PeAVic U: e =xk ° am Ave SE 51h Ave SRI a SITE LOCATION C County Lm- Rd SVV m �~ 2nd St E D 167 N 3 AMERICAN TOWEP CORP C 1181FUNTINC'ONAVENL'E 11TLFLOOR DRIVING DIRECTIONS START AT VER'ZEN O'FICES AT 3350 161ST AVE SE I MS 9221, BELLEVUE WA 98008 TURN LEFT ON SE EASTGATE WAY TURN RIGHT ON SE 37TH ST - GO 0 50 8 MI -URN RIGHT 10 TAKE RAMP ONTO -99 W 1 O W ARD GEA T 1 LL, I AKE -0OS SOl II H TO HW V 1F7 SOUTH. TAKE AI GONA PACIFIC EXIT AT END OF OFF PANIC TURN LEFT ONTO ELLINGSON (GO 1 2 MILES) T URN R.GHI ONTO A STREET (GO 06 MI) TURN DEFT ONTO LAKELAND HILLS WAY (GO 1 0 MI I TURN RIGHT ONTO EVERGREEN WAY. TURN RIGHT ONTO PANORAMA DRIVE SE AFTER HAZEL AVE SE TURIN RIGHT INTO GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVEWAY WOOD'NVILLS WA969]2 APPROVAL / SIGN OFF APPROVED BY DATE SIGNATURE SITE AC OUISITION FAX 1425)487 -1734 150318A0 -4941: ZONING SITE AOUISITI, CODE INFORMATION R ZONING CLASSIFICATION R -' 151NGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, )-4444 — 11h CONSTRUCTION MANAGER oba�!irealr of Ie:.soc cul:' CODE INFORMATION EIA7IA- -222 -F FRCJECT MANAGER 2005 NEC SARAH TELSCHOW14251274 -4444 EXT 114 REVIENERS SHALL CLEARLY PLACE INITIALS ADJACENT TO EACH REDLINE NOTE AS DRAWINGS ARE BEING REVIEWED veriZon wireless 5811 PANORAMA DR SE AUBURN, WA 98092 PIERCE COUNTY AMERICAN TOWER SITE # 89523 PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT l LESSEE PROJECT CONSULTANTS VERIZON WIRELESS REALCOM ASSOCIATES I b9U0 SE EASTGATE WAl SUITE _?' 14432 SE EASTGATE WAY, SUITE 26L BELLEVUE, WA 98006 BELLEVUE IVA SBL" ' --9 21 -41?_l PH 14251271 -1144 ISSUED "D _N, NE PFRMII FAX (425)L14 -4449 M1N0 PROPERTY OWNER 05 -22 -00 AMERICAN TOWEP CORP DRA 1181FUNTINC'ONAVENL'E 11TLFLOOR A bOSION 11 -2111 AARON P_('11h1 PROJECT ENGINEER (503) 8804940 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING Nu TOWER OWNER 16925 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD HE SUHH,210 AMERICAN l OV&P CORP WOOD'NVILLS WA969]2 115HUN'INI O!:AVFNUF I1THFI —H h1ARK W OLSON PE BOSTON, MA 02I 1E PI (425)487 173' AARON SLOCM FAX 1425)487 -1734 150318A0 -4941: SITE AOUISITI, CODE INFORMATION 0 V BAZ +L -wIC= ZONING CLASSIFICATION R -' 151NGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, )-4444 — 11h P1111CIN( —ODF ^[106 S, oba�!irealr of Ie:.soc cul:' CODE INFORMATION EIA7IA- -222 -F LANDUSE l PERMITS 2005 NEC SARAH TELSCHOW14251274 -4444 EXT 114 CONST RUCTION TYPE I PLL1.OMMll NI1ATIONS slelschowa'reelcanessoc con I1— PANCI' UNOCCUPIED URISNCTION CITY OF 4UBURN CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PPOP EISED BUILDING! ISE I INMANNFL. TFI F L OMM ED STEWAR- (206) 402-IC AB SITE LOCATION USED ON SAD 83)_ eaw.,nt slewerlc venzmwlreleava1r _AT.TUDF 47 15 2. TV N PARCEL NUMBER(S) 11, GITIIDF 1.'2' 13' 11 79 %' W 1152OOe2G1i TOP OF STRUCTURE 99' -0' AGL BASE OF S- RUCTJRE 5155 AMSL AREA OF PARCEL e13415F PROJECT AREA C 95 ACRES 1 1251 S E EOUIPMENI AREA NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA GENERAL INFORMATION 0 0 5 F 1 FOURMENT TO BE LOCATED I TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED WITHIN EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA, 2 NEW FORAGE 15 PROPOSE[' 3 ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS PROPOSI U PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION THIS PROPOSAL IS A'4E'IN TELECOt✓I,1'JHICAT :ON FACILITY WHICH IN' WDES -HE - L_.NI:N6 191 PANE_ ANTENNAE NIIIH O) ANIENNA rER SE( TuR ON A EX `I NG 99' -L SELF SUPPOPT- !I\"!E, ADDAN 8'- U"x16 -9' EQUIPMENT SHELTER WITHIN A 12' -0" A 30' -0' LEASE AREA 11150 -1N D ESEL GEVERA`OR MOUNTED C' IiA4' -F .6' -0" COI.CRETE SLA3 ECIJ,IJE. I'I z veriZon wireless WeA�4151��ru��1�9r REALC0M = 1LANS PFE///PAR��ED BY �EOo NERSTFONEN = PROJECT INFO TACLAKELAND bh:1 PANORAMA OR SE AUBURN, WA9hG92 PIERCE COUNTY = ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT =REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY _CK UTILITY COMPANIES POWER TELEPHONE PUGET "I IND ENERGY OWEST COMMUNICATIONS ' --9 21 -41?_l ' 80C- 475 -7526 veriZon wireless WeA�4151��ru��1�9r REALC0M = 1LANS PFE///PAR��ED BY �EOo NERSTFONEN = PROJECT INFO TACLAKELAND bh:1 PANORAMA OR SE AUBURN, WA9hG92 PIERCE COUNTY = ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT =REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY _CK = DRAW'N81' CHI. APV J DRA DRA MWO = 1- URRFNI ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 =I IC FNSLIRF = DRAWING INFORMATION E1111 T� = URAV ✓ING F TITLE SHEET = DRAW) ".G )NUMBER T ®1 0 CFI IOF N1IMBER 09 -563'5 QO 96 -03- 09 ISSUED "D _N, NE PFRMII Alb M1N0 QB 05 -22 -00 IcCIIED FOR CLIENT REV[CW DRA Mh'O A 05 -05 -09 ISSl1ED FOR CLIENT PE VIEW DRA h1 W'0 = DRAW'N81' CHI. APV J DRA DRA MWO = 1- URRFNI ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 =I IC FNSLIRF = DRAWING INFORMATION E1111 T� = URAV ✓ING F TITLE SHEET = DRAW) ".G )NUMBER T ®1 0 CFI IOF N1IMBER 09 -563'5 GENERAL NOTES: CONCkcTE NOTES: STRUCTURAL NOTES: 1 THEE OPOSED INSTALLATION WILL BE UNMANNED AND DOES NOT REQUIRE PU'ABLE- WATER 1 ALL CONCRETE C HUX- RUCTION SUALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI -518 1 1.11-D AWINIS FOR 111U, IURAL S I EEL SHALL BE F,IBMITTFD TITHE GINSUL TANT FOE OR SEWER SERVOS REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS UNMANNED AND 15 NOT FOR HUMAN IIABIIAI ION (N,I CONCFETE SHALL BE Mil PC, PROPORTIONFD, CONVEYED AND PLACED IN ALLJRDANCE WITH IBC 2006 SEC ZION 19C5 AND ACI 101 STREN CTHS AT 26 DAYS ANG M1Y CRITERIA SHALL BE AS FOLLO`IVS 2 SI RULTUR4L STEEL DESIGN, FAHRK,AI ION PAINTING AND FRECTION ,INCLUDING FIELD .El DING IANDI,AP ACCESS IS REOU RBDI AJB HIGH STRENGT,, FIELD BOLTING EXFANSION bULTS AND I HRLADED EXPANSION ANCHORS, JCCUPANC) IS LIMITED-0 PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND INSPECIIUN APPROYIMAIFII "TIMES TYpE OF LQNSTRDLIIDN 28 DAI STRENGTHS If,, SHALL BE BASLD ON IHL AISI "SPEIJf IC,AT IONS FOR THE DESIGN FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF CTRUCTIINN STFFI FOR BUILDINGS' LATEST EDITION SUPERVISION SHALL BE It, ACCORDANCE PERMGNIH BY VERSON WIRELESS TECHNICIANS A SLABS ON GRADE WIT H IBC 2006 CHAPTER I], BYAUUALIFIEDILSI INGAGENBYOESIGNEDBY 1FACONSUITANT 4 GO NOISL SMUKE, DUST OR OBOE WILL RESDLI FROM 1HI.S PROPCSAI- LOPPING SLABS CONCRETE PIERS 3000 ps: THE CONSUL TANT THAI L BE FURNISHED WITH A COPY OF ALL INSPECTION REPORTS AND TEST RESULTS 5 OUTDOOR STORAGE AND SOLID WASTE C nNTAINERS ARE NOT PROPOSED B ALL STRIJL :TURAL CONCRETE 4000 p>I a S BUD URA[ S I FBI SHALL C ONFCIHM ICI - HE= OLLO*ING REOU'REMENTS 6 ALL NET EREN.LS TO SPECIFIC, STANDARDS FOR THIS PROPOSAL ARE UVDERSTOnC TO BE L GONCRFTF FOUNDATIONS 3090 ps, TYPE OF MEMBER LATEST VERSION THE TFNOERED MOST HNDERGO A SITE VISIT TO CAREFULL Y EXAMINE AND UNDERSTAND THE CEMENT SHALL BE ASTM C150, PORTLAND CEMENT TYPE I: UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE A WIDE FLANGES ASTM A992 Fy =50 ks' B PL AT E S, S NAPE S, ANSI F S, AND RODS AS TN A3C, Fy =36 ks1 SCOPE OF THE WORK REQUIRED BEFORE BID SUBMISSION NO COMPENSATION IN ANYFORM 3 1 H CONSTRUCT 'IN MANAGER SHAD SUPERVISE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FDR IHE METHODS AM1D C SPECIAL SHAPES AND PLATES ASTM A512, Fy=:2 ks IN'ILI BE PAID FOR FXPFNSEE RFSULTING FROM FAIL URE TO 0050 PROCEDURES OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT D PIPES ASTM. A53, Fy = 3Lk sI P IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE 4 AL I CONCH[ TC WITH SURFACES EXPOSED TO STANDING WATER SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED WIIO AM1 E STRUCTURAL TUBINT ASTM ASOU, Fy =46 FS, F ANCHOR BOLTS ASTM A30> CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE AIR -ENFDA INCD AGENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C260. C494. CG 18. 0989 AND LI0'Y TO-AL AID C CONNECTION BOLTS ASTM A325 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CC,NTENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLES 1904 OF THE ISO 200F, 9 C-''NTRACTC'R'S RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD MEASUREMENTS TO CONFIRM LONG FH S nF CABLE 5 REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM T J ASTM A615( INCLUDING SUPPLEMEN I PH, GRADF IT N- 4 ALL MATERIAL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTE FIND LAI OR PER AS IM A1231 A123M 00 TRAYS, ELECTRICAL LINES, AND ANTENNA CABLES PC, 000 Ps EXCEPTIONS ANY BARS SPECIFICALLY SU NOTED ON IN IF DRAWINGS SHALL BE GRADF ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN,ONFORMANCE WI IH IISC AND VFRI]ON WIRELFSS STANDARDS AND `U RJUTING OF ALL CONDUITS, CABLES CABLE IRAYS ETC. IS INDIC ATEL AS PROPOSED 40, ly = 40,000 ps, GRADE CC REINFORCING BARS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS TFI BL WELDFD SHAN CONFORM TO ASTM A]Ob REINFORCING C FGAPLYING IPIITHASTM A6151S1, MAY FIT WELDED ONLY IF SHALL BE PERFORMED BY WASO CERTIFIED WELDERS USING LYOX% ELECTRODES ONLY PRE QUALIFIED WE LDS,AS DEFINED BY VERION WIRELESS) SHALL BE USED WELDING OF GRADE 60 LOCATIONSONLY CONFIRM THE EXACT ROUTING WITH THE ON -SITE CONSTRUE =TION MANAGER MATERIAL PROPERTY REPORTS INDICATING CONI- ORMANCE WITH WELDING PROCEDURFS REINFORCING BARS (IF REOUIREU)FLALL BE PERFORMED USING I OW Hs DOGGER ELECTRODES PRIOR TO THE START E= WORK SPEC'FIEC IN AWS D14 ARE SUBMIT IED WELDING OF GRADE X10 REINFORCING BARS (IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E]0XX 11 ALL DAMAGE OR OPENING UP OF THE EXIST INC STRUCTURE MUST BE MADE GOOD TO THE G REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DETAILED (INCLUDING HOOKS AND BENDS, IN 4 CORDANCE WITH ACI ELECTRODES WELDING WITUI6;4" Of COLD BENDS IN REINFORCING STEEL IS NIT PERMITTED SEE REINFORCING N ITF FOR MATFRIAI RFOUIREMENTS OF WELDED BARS PRE CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OR BETTER 315 AND 318 LAP ALL ION INUOUS REINFORGEM ENT AT I EAST 30 BAR DIAMETERS OR AWNIMUM 12 INSPECTION OF COMPLE -ED A'ORK IS REQUIRED BEFORE COVERING JP PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2' -0" PROVIDE CORNER bAPS AT AT I WALL AND FOOTING INTERSECTIONS I AP CORNER BARS AT LEAST 30 BAR DIAMETERS OR A MINIMUM OF 2' -0" LAP ADJACENT MATS OF WELDED WERE FABRIC G COLD FIRMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS SHAT L HE OF THE SHAPE, SI, E AND GAGE SHOWN ON IHE PLANS PROVIDED MINIMJM SECTION LNIPERTIES INDICATED ALL COLD FORMED STEEL OF 72 HOURS NOTICE TO CONSULTANT A MINIMUM OF 8" AT SIDES AND ENDS FRAMING S, CALL —F OHM TO I I -IF AISI "SPECIFICAT IN FOR THE DESIGN OF COLD FORMED STEEL 13 REMOVE AND CLEAN UP ANY DEBRIS OR MATERIAL FROM THE ELL E I HHOUGHOLI: THE DURATION T WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL LOGFORM -0 A-TM A185 STRUCI URAL MEMBERS" OF THE CONTRA,( ON A DAILY BASIS AND UPON COMPLEI ION OF THE WORK AS DIRECTED BY ] BOLTED 1,ONNEGTIQNS SHALL I ISE BEARING TYPE ASTM A325 BOLTS 1314 "0) AND SHALL HAVE THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 8 SPIRAL REINFOR(:EI•IFNT SHALL BE P=AIN WIRE CONFORMING TO ASTM A615 GRADE 63, ly = 60,000 MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL ASSEMBLIES ARE TO BE TIGHTENED IN 14 OHIAIN AND PAY FOR ALL ELECT RIGA[ PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION Ps, ACCORDANCE WITH "SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL OiNTS USING ASTM A325 OR A490 , JUNE 302004 FORBEARING -TYPE CONNECTIONS, AS A MINIMUM THE BOLTS SHALL BE TIGHTENED TO OF WORK AND ACIEPTANCE PROVIDED CERTIFICATES TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 9 NO BARS PARTIALLY FM TOPER IN HARDENED CONCRETE SHALL BE FIELD BENT UNLESS A'SNUG -IGHT" CONDITION A "SNUG TIGHT" CONDITION IS DEFINED AS THE TIGHTNESS IHAI VERY) ING H TAI THE WORK CONFORMS TO THE RFOUIRFMENTS OF ALI CODESANE' SPECIFICALLY SC DETAILED OR APPROVED HY THE FNGINFFR OF RECORD EXISTS WHEN ALL PLIES IN A JOINT ARE INFIRM ION T ALT THIS MAY 13 ATTAINED BY A FEW AU THORITIFS HAVING JURISDICTION IMPACTS OF AN IMPAC- WRENCH OR THE FULL EFFORT OFA MAN USING AN ORDINARY SPUD 15 PROVIDE VERIY'ON WIREL FSS WITH A WRITTEN WARRANT) EFFECT'VE FOR ONE YEAR AFTER 10 IONCRETE PROTECTION, COVER) FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS WRENCH DATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR THE COMPLETE INSTALLATION REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DEFECTS A FOOTINGS AND OTHER LINFORMED 3' 8 NON - STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS PER STEEL GRATING MAY USE Sly'D ASIM A307 BOLIA ON_ESS ARISING DURING THIS PERIOD AT NO EXTRA COST TO VERION WIRELESS SURFACES EARTH FACE NOTED OTHERWISE 16 NO DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS 15 ALLOWED WITHOUT WRITTEN B FORMED SURFAIIFS EXPOSED OG BARS OR LARGER) 2' 9 ALL WELDS TO BE 114' FILLET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE APPROVAL FROM THE CONSULTANT FAILURE TO OBSERVE THIS RULE MAY RESULT IN I EARTH OP WEATHER (45 BARS OR SMALLER, 1 172 CONTRACTOR CORRECTING THE INSTALLATION AT THEIR EXPENSE 2 SLABS ANG WALL5 INTERIOR FACET 314 10 TOUCH UP ALL FIELD URIT ING AND 1WEL DING WITH 2 COATS OF GAL VIGON,ZINC RICH PAINT) GO APPROVED EQUAL ABBREVIATIONS: 11 BARS SHALL BE SUFFORTED ON CHAIRS OR D061E BRICKS I^ ANCHOR BOLTS TO CONFORM TC ASTM A30 A ABOVE FINISED D JT JOINT A ABOVE FINISHED GRADE LAM LAMINATED E SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: IFS ABOVE FINISHED SLAB M MANUFACTURER CT ALUh4 ANCHOR M9 MA IF MANUFACTURER 15 NUN SHRINK C•ROUT SHALL BE FURNISHED BY AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER AND SHALL BE MIXED AB ANCHOR BOLT MA MAXIMUM AND PLACED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH 'NE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISI- EDRECOMMENDATIONS SPECIAL INSPE ClI0N5 .N ACC ORDPIJ(E Nl T -1 IBC 3C,0G SECTION "]04 ANGLE ME CH MECHANICAL ARCH ARCHITECTURAL MH MANHOLE GROUT STRENGTH SHALL BEAT LEAST EQUAL IOIHE h4AlERIPL ON WHI,H IT :S FLA: ED (3.030 ps, MINIhIUh ^) SOIL SITED-. ECHNICAL BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM MM MILLIMETER ❑SHORING INSTAL CATION AND MONITORING FLOG BLDG BUILDING MIN MINIMUM ❑OBSERVE AND CrtGAVATION REAM BM BEAM MPH MILES PER DOT BOTTOM MPH MILES PER HJUR DVE R,FY SOIL BEARING pE BEARING BEARING DRAIN-AGE PLACEMENT ❑VERIF1 LEGEND AND SYMBOLS: BOTTOM OF MT_ METAL ❑VERIFY ILL MAT AND COMP ACTION BOB BOTTOM OF DO rE NO NOT IN CONTRACT CONDITIONS D ❑VERIFY CONDITIONS STEEL BOB BOTTOM OF STEEL NOM NOMINAL rl CINTROI JOINT TITS NOT TO SCALE CHAIN LINK FENCE GER CASTC)RI ❑PILE PLACEMENT (AUGER CASTICR,VEN PILE) DITHER FE CENT LINE OL ON CENTER CEDAR FENCL CLG CEILING ON CUT SIDE DIAMETER CLR CLEAR ON OVERHEAD FORTES REINFORCED COtGRE HE mREINFJRGING STEEL AND CONCRETE PLACEMENT r;MD CODIECT F 11ASONRY UNIT ING OPENING COLUMN OPP OPPOSITE Tr1 CO OPRESTRCSSEDIPREChST CONCRETE FABRICAT ON AND ERECTION ❑HATCH PLANT INSPECTION CONC CONCRETE PCs PERSONAL COMMON CATION SYSTEM CONEI CONSTRUCTION R PLATE PON'ERIIELC O — Ill In ❑SHOT CRETE ❑GROUTING CONT CONTINUOUS PR PAIR COAX =r�o- c "o „i. ❑OTHER CTR CENTER P51 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH CIA 10 DIAMETER PSF FOUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT OVERHEAD POWER STRUCTURAL STEEL DTL DETAIL PT PRESSURE I REAILD CENTERLINE — LLIFABRICATIONANDSHCIPVJELDS 11 EXISTING RAC RADIUS E4 'A IT RC RIIOFORAIN DERLL HIGH AND F'LLD WELDS AND BIT TING DOTHEP EJ EXPANSI REINS REQUIREDEOIPENFQRCItJC' REVISION B.IG Q1 ELEC ELEVATION LELTRICAL REQ'C REQUIRED IELECTT EI ION RM ROOM Ell EQUAL RAN RIGHT OF WAY ,QUAL - Dt TAIL NUMBER STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM EW EACH WAY SCHED SCHEDULE OFABR[CATION AND SHOP WELDS FIT EXPANSION SECT SECTION FIT "FE RI SF SQUARE FOOT ELEVATION VIEW - PUG LYE RE CTION AND FIEL D WELDS AND BOLTING ,OTHER DR FD FLOOR DRAIN SIM SIMILAR FIN FIISNISH SO FT SQUARE FOOT - - STEEL LUMBER - -- — FIN FLR FINH FLOOR SS STAINLESS TAND RD STEEL FLR FLOOR STD STANDARD PTO FOOTING STL STEEL C' 0 ELEVATION AP OF STRUM =TJRAL MA INGOI1 ❑CUN11Nl1OUS OPEHIJOIC GA GAUGL STRUC STRUCTURAL ❑ GALV GALVANIZED ILIJP TFMPIRARY — DETAIL NUMBER GYP GYPSUM THK THICK GB GYPSUM BOARD 10 TOP OF DETAI! BUG _ SHEET NUMBER OIHFR HM HOLLOW METAL IIS TOP IF STEEL FOR HORIZONTAL TOO CTOP OF DISCRETE HE HOUR TIP TYPICAL ANCHOR.IA TI CONCRETE ME OTTE INSTALLED IN CONCRETE HT HEIGHI INO UNLESS NOTED 1T ERWISC _ SECTION BUG -_ ❑POST - INSTALLATION ADHESIVE ANCHORS HVAC HEACNO VENTI _ATIGN AIR CONDITIONING `JERT VERTICAL - - - - - - -__ "'-- DE-AII NUMBER DFOST- INSIALLAIIOI:4ILI= HA— ALANC'HIPS NSUI LNSULAT•ON W: WITH TNT INTERIOR WWM WELDED WIRE MLSII -- -- SLIEST NUMBER V@r%7Oflwireless H C111-1 lM1'ensvel stcP vnAmg log yw REALC ®M :FT ANA PREPARED BY IT t•i E olry FFnlrvo.v� :PROJECT INFO TACLAKELAND 5611 PANORAMA DR BE AJBURt4 WA 98002 FIFRCE COUNTY :ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT : REV =041E _DESCPIPTION =BY -CK = DRAWN BY CHK =APV LDR, DRA MWO C CURRENT ISSUE DATE os -os -os L CENSURE '.eeee4. DRAWING INFORMATION FL III _11 DRAWING TITLE GENERAL NOTES DRAINING NUMBER G ®1 0 CEI JOB NUMBER 0956315 Q Vb -USU6 ISSUED FOR ZONING PERNII I AJB MWO B 05- 2e. -U9 ISSUEDFOR CLIENT REVIEW ORA MWO A 05 -05 -09 ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW BEA PGAD DRAWN BY CHK =APV LDR, DRA MWO C CURRENT ISSUE DATE os -os -os L CENSURE '.eeee4. DRAWING INFORMATION FL III _11 DRAWING TITLE GENERAL NOTES DRAINING NUMBER G ®1 0 CEI JOB NUMBER 0956315 r CELLULAR SITE I PORTION OF THE NE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SEC. 06 TWP. 20 N. RNG 05 E, W.M. N/ .,. ELEV -5v111 Dill nAn!, rvsrcalwvn �MUL 11 '', / i 86 P�'P� 0 P1 -- 2E III s 0' / % TRACT "D.. TANKSITE 27 1 1 TRACT „B" ZII II / S J ""` I I / 1 TL #0520662013 A / ion so FT 29 I I / 35 IRJrer ovwo" / 4� \ "' _ TRACT "C" 65 / / \ m `. lUHEFHLCO lS PE IJN 111'1" nF NEa.R1 32 / / / \ 67 o,E / / 6II !our Iry 33 cM rm Pin.orvlcwalo�L� �` • \ ,/ ��.�,�''/ , / 69 rL DI �0. \ \�\, �/. Oa s / s a 7. % .. 70 71 \ i 72 �n�\ 73 74 BOUNDARY MAP �n— Wu' NOTE, I -LMA MAY PANEL I. AVAILAnLC fOP nIIS SnE JJ l 1 C \� �f r _�/5 c VICINITY MAP NTS N PIERCE ° f R✓" v a ,. _-7 NOTE UTILIr1 EASLM LNI - IH All 200 -29-11 CAN no I LL —I ED LEE r 1111 DAII TIIS SURVEY lN4E PCItrOI:MCU Wll I I n lavcnN CPT n YnOanmrrowc nlEODUU Ie PtnuwG DIRECT TO 31EGOIJDA Jr ARL AND M1 N URI AN nl TANG[ Ir'(2PPM11h D)1 mm &iUPLDN LttinNIl GPS REG[IVCRS MLASUNING DISI nrvcF lDR!NPMxo)6n,m, NGS 5ELINE —ADED /�� nII nNORFJYaLLrnGOATs l�y�wAR 811 ,w. NAI LTILITIES r.DDER EDUD . OCATr -- OVEN IEAC GABLE lO RHLAD POWER I LL I GANEE OI R DFrRIHIIIND TELmHm!e Ll — - RMI cnARLr NI WATER TRIP MAIDARI, - /-- O EAREEDWIIRE!WREFE- rOUND MONUMLNI IN LASE F DUIUU I I IAP w� p SC'LEE LAIR x LAP IIHOL aNLv HUT NIFGNALN e IT ILE ' ET rSAGInAIL ® ouND iaoT,"a - -1 e rnInn urro IDN w nl1N R I A0,E E j WALLET V LT W ATEN METER m AEV1 ��ME. IIIHTI ANY,RD _. cWER I UTILITY POLL j RMO1I;T R,RANRFDDNIER IBJ ""MFITFR ' TEL1111 EVAULI - — <L IIONE MEP ,n. a T .,MKER Uc PRR NOTE HIGMM1A MARFFR ALL CLLVAI IDE111 —N ARE AROVF MFAN IFA I FVFI (A 1L) ELEVATIONS REFENENCED ID l E` N" EE DARJM R) ALL TOWER, TREE AND APPUN I ENANEF IF I .T1 AMR AGOVE GROUND LEVEL IAGLI OO'ILUr1 Hoo iEPRESEN I ED AR _ ' IL CFit DI Iu AL HtICHI POP ORJEGTS ORCATCR TI1AN i We" EE n Ducus R AL ALDER l' Eis_ N,r�PLE — UNKNIAnsTERID) Ell ED." E`VERC PEF - U MA =MIAI'AORDNA 'O. D _ G oAPY TRUNNDIAMLIID(IN) E =DOUC,AS 1 I 191IEIGI IT AGE n MtnGURE° [ HE -11. P NE T:rE DRIP ONES ARE ro LE IR WE F AT`PR -MATED AT'! 5' 1114 u' AROVI ""IND I FVFI- SHOWN APE FOR REFERENLE V NLV ANU OI HLa TREES AND VCGEI n I ION MAl' L+' SITE INFORMATOD =1 - sz0o rors suF PANOPAMA 1111E E1 PU�RUFN WA EOaO] I'D' IIIIIIIN 1111 OWNFRlrR IAERIGAN TOWER NTIAL F flM1ACPER1 ATITUDC'LCEGIIDLLPOEIIO _ .PDI NA F ,T DATA[ -S .G TOWCII LAI11 UD LO11GITUOE 79 W NAI 11 GP,II I STREETUDL PALL DL - REN 1I111IA ION PPl5 144 v LILY 430 NAVD OC 1ENCI IMARK DI- 1IMEI< CPI.OI. Wns M,D tOCHtcF KOR OPALRENCH11ARU6 TIE ELEYn r_ ANt ADLUPATF. wlTlul TIE Fn+ 1/ Ver#M 1 wireless We Malrerslop workb'p (P, you. PROJECT CONSULTANIS PLANS PREPARLD BY �aE Eoo NER59oONE Dc W LFDFEMDID F RD 121L IVITL -lc L o11 o PROJECI INFO, RNENSI�rvF .I Vac TACLAKELAND 5N I I PANORAMA DRIVE BE AUBURN, WA 90992 PIERCE COUNTY ISSUED FOR .s. ICLIENT REVIEW REV:= DATE' =DESCRIPTION: ®BY'_CK'� NEW LRC L Qz nov o11 -11N's IIM FvIF- UIJDARY AID!, EnEEM I erviTI Dnm .mn Qn5111ED IDITIAI .FI6MITTAL UMD JTAI = DRAWNBY' CHK —AV.= DMO KJD CURRENT ISSUE DAI E: ___ 06 -01 -09 _ LICCNSURE: Y' Ylwy 4F� :DRAWING INFORMA1 ION ' ED I.T El 111 IIAWINP� F uLTANTs cF aFPIFr - 111—lEUEE OF THE TIP nOPPIETARY EY !n IuRECD — D11 IF DIS ATEO TO NAIAEC CLIENT SlE "LIC`r'rPR' " "I "E E RE :DRAWING TITLE EIVILIIRVEY Y SITE DETAIL :DRAWING NUMBER C -1 2 CE! JOBNUMBER OA -58315 � 11/ NAC c, ✓>SPC3hBR,RZ�,I. \1 TRACT "ID" \ TANKSITE TREE LINE TYP —� / I I nUND BAR A L AI LH,BB,N A -\ All: = "TA On- \ rV, / EQUIPMENT SHELTER ON IFLUX A RUN \ \ / No GAIELD WIRE AIIIG FENCE / / A . P Ba T,'°° 35 I« rI v '- _- - ELG GRAVEL IYP CELLULAR SITE t r / fI \ 61, T TRACT S" I T �L ✓, I r IBbA 0 s0pG 6F l R2, 01 3 -0 013 1 I I I II 1 I II v '^ II , `PWRMETEI O \ v / \," / 110ALSNCu PORTION OF THE NE 1l4 OF THE NW 114 OF SEC. 06 TWP. 20 N. RNG. 05 E. W.M. /. L \ Ly I / r L..�iI�`�1•r:��1A.nt. n.l, 34 6j °�- eausH LwE rvr, 'j - _ , 'II n \F,/ / / I-CE o.E '- ouND AI SIAP` DL Ar \ Y J'. ✓/ / ~ / uo ',aG— _nPEtENGLSmoozLS;mao .y`�� ELEV. u1O BT yWiyY' •',4• , ." // / / Z_- TRACT "C" \\ y, / 'anwoLE TVr t1 l 28 11 �11 �j / 29 ff 30 31 32 "LCV- BB. TC \� / .,7/ 10' UTILITY CA5CMCNT \\ I� / `'0 /PICT, PLAT OF VIEWRIDGE� UNUEHINOUND WAIRR, IA uNDnFHGaO IND rON'ER,Pttr RD SITE MAP UNDERGROUND CABLE, TYP �/ P- 11VAULT,1,1 � - -- JO UNDE , nPONIER, m A PUFq .rAL[ , n PAD MOUNTED2TRANII.Ell R J \ / EASE MENIFII PSE PER \\ \ / i /• AIN eoasou/ruT "" \ v i FFRPIATIFVIE "VULDOF i UTILITY E 5 \5 �cHEH, �\'P,�/ �� 1 G I a r °�Klkl x � f„ r TOWER DETAIL >. GALL T11 -111NC DAYS �'�l` XI BEror,E rou D1G' 111 111 G! ULAPG� ::=H, UNDERGROUND TE "'." urvDCRGROU,D IABLE PI UNDBRGROUIR Gns Lc,E -- UNDERGROUND WATER LINE - -:'t- SANITARY LINE —an— TOR. LINE r r, 'All DNT RDL DNI I .. ' WASHEh r MAGIALF roue a AGRNw J�Lr a1 ExlsirtlS VI. ELEVnTION GI,AIN BASIN FOHNN e DATDH BASIN wiRF EYEBOLT CI R METER q,rn, Mc• GAS VALVE W-o LIIII SInNUnHG POL✓ UTILITY POLE POLE GUI WAR[ CJ PAD r-11 UNILC II :nN: wun�u, rowE2 vcuca IS oNERISFR P Iur- SIGN r1 NOTE ai HR.HNL1 MARE1G 1 All Fl EVATICNA SHOWN ART ALLAr MEAN 5FA I P /EI AMSL) ELEVATION$ RCrERCNGCD TD TI IE NAVD Oc DATUM 21 ALL TOWER, TREE AND 1111I111LANCr HFIF -B ARE ABOVE GROUND LEVEL PA H B1 nl Hn,,Hrs RErarsnarrn am nccuanTF To C 112 h Or TOTAL HEIGHT FORTDBJEG78 GREATER THAN LIT D CCIDUEUS AL= LOER AILl �E�;FRAMETER(IN) DEG UVOUa D MA_..ADRDNA I cH= CCDAR L A I - <DIAneCTnt IIN) H`GO ILs 105 ?IEVGI IT AIL IIN IF MEASURED IIL-IILMLULF 0 PI PII E B us IF ER LINES ARE TO scnLC DIAMETERS WERE ArraOJ.NlATED AT 35 TP 40 ABOVE AREI 114D I rvr-I TREES SHOWN ARE FOR PErEECNDC GNI Y AND 'THE' TREES ANON CiETATIRR IVAY EAST. _ TAX LOT NUMBER 0`2o 20,3 rA RE.. s ANORAM+DHIVE SE AueureN.- - .1 RE DWNER AMERICAN IOINLR A wnI n CN HONE NUMBER 9[5IRA V82A E %1.3Nq �ONIU. FAMILY RLIDLtERAL TOTAL L. AREA Too 41NS IC HI US ALNCS) lH.JEC1 1E. :LATrtuDE, LONGITUDE PCSITION 11 ANIATE na G El I I'NI T-1 NAU U3 FEE LA, LONGITUDE 1eDl3' 11'W "1 U3 NDUND ELEV 5JG 00 NAI-1 OTRUGTURCHCIGH 0600 IGL VERALLNEIIHI- BEOII✓I SISMAE, IS ELEV - a3 a0' NAVD O" :CCNGHMAR,.UISGIAIM[R -- -_ ELEVAIIONSESIABLISI SEAT fI IIS 511E ARE -NIL -NA IIUN NO E k1 WA MADE L I I L L LN IIMANRS IL VAi I.N. AGE All 1HUATI FHIIU IR E FAA UL-IANIL GLIJBI I El I OR TII R Ve iZOnwireless wH 300 Q w 19 rol you, PROJECT CONSULTANTS' PLANS PREPARED BY �/ CDRNER91oDNE "I2" W"'INVILLL.aEDNIOND RD NE GIL TE 210 IIIAII ©p9 2 r PROJEC r INFO: _.�. TAC LAKELAND 6811 PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA. 98092 PIERCE COUNTY ISSUED FOR -- ' - -� CLIENT REVIEW RFV:_DATF'. =DESCRIPrION.° BY =GK= Q2 clmlo "II!0 LD IECERloNS JIM uR All 11 M1 MO JTM Qp NIU "i0 IHITIALSUBMITTAL R.. JIM C DRAWN BY CHK.:OAPV: = DMO KJO I ATM CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -01 -09 :DRAWING INFORMATION' rnrvrr.A TTORISUSF'[Hlrr All r" °A- TREII°16BII AP- PRICTARHIBN LnTED iTUNP EEDrSIEl.u9 ENi5 DRAWING TITLE' CIVIL SURVEY SITE DETAIL DRAWING NUMBER: V2 2 CEI JOB NUMBER 09 -56315 NOTE: I H I.I11E5 PRE L�T1,A1 FD W I I HIN A 10' -D" WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT ZONING LISE SIR GLF FHMIII RFBIDFlJTIAI �Z(/ ZIDE P -1 J4�7 CIO 0 �v �P ADJACENT ZONING USE SINGLE FAM10 RESIDENTIAL ZONE R -1 TRACT "D" TANK SITE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 50kW DIESEL GENERATOR 1 A -4 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT SHELTER - - - -- - 1 ¢ 3511:RAVF1 DRIVFW41 36 1 ZFj lL I 6yC � s6P,`9 -- 34 WIRELESS ANTENNAS A -31 A -31 A -3 1 �y9, TL #0520062013 - 41,341 SU It '{�' - WIRELESS ANTENNAS A.IP 6 B MOUNT SUEDE R CLIENT REVIEW 26 27 TRACT "E" - -- - -- -- - - ADJACENT ZONING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 28 ZONF R -I 29 PROPOSED VERIZON I t( ,�1 �� 30 - -- 34 WIRELESS ANTENNAS A -31 A -31 A -3 1 i� I PROPOSED VERIZON '{�' - WIRELESS ANTENNAS A.IP 6 B MOUNT SUEDE R CLIENT REVIEW DRA MWO 0. OD -0' -09 ISSUED FOR (:LI ENT REVIEW DRA MWO pq�ORgMgORi�E TRACT"C11\ N5, , PROPOSEDSB/ PEEAFN2002n2T0 fi0{CIOLtIIGRJESE INTERCONNECT - 32 NOTE TRACT "C" IS SUE.,ECT TC AN INGRESS l - sO56„ - CGRLSS ANDUTILITIES EASEMENT OVER T'S - ENT IRF AREA F.R NON- Enf.LIISIVF USE B1 v RAT, - AT&T PER THE PLAT OF VIEWRIDGE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS POWER SITE ACCESS' AND TELCO ROUTE TO EQUIPMENT - -- _- _. 33 -. / ��id _ 3 � - -- (El 10- INILIT \FNSEMENT l.�� PER I'-AT OF VIEWRIDGE Z(j ADJACENT ZONING USE SINGLEFAMLY RESIDENTIAL ZHU, R -1 (E) OWESTTE- COPEDES`AL45822 - - -- --- _ - - - -- \ ', - �`� IF) P SF TPANSFOR MEP C57097:', ; l R7" 1 ,. m ADJACENT ZONING USE SING -E FAMILY RESIDENTIAI ONE R ADJACENT ZONING USE SINGLE F41,1ILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE R -1 13 verizonwireless r slop waMir,4 rorYOu RELCOM P LANS PREPARED BI PRO.IELT INFt1 TACLAKELAND 5F11I ANDIDAMA DR- AUBURN WA] 2 PIERCE COUNTY ISSUECI FOR ZONING PERMIT r REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY =CK 1 L DRAWN BY GHK =APV J DRA DRA IAWG CURRENT IJS�E DATE 06 -03 -09 L�CLNSURE peaa,<4 i •�rPm�ei� <® -1 ®1 L� 1 DRAWING INFPRMATION DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN DRAW'INO NUMBER -1 CEI 'IN NUMRFR 09 -1-5 U 0G -03 -0� SUED FOR ZONINI, PERIJ,D A.IP MINE B 05 -2' -09 SUEDE R CLIENT REVIEW DRA MWO 0. OD -0' -09 ISSUED FOR (:LI ENT REVIEW DRA MWO L DRAWN BY GHK =APV J DRA DRA IAWG CURRENT IJS�E DATE 06 -03 -09 L�CLNSURE peaa,<4 i •�rPm�ei� <® -1 ®1 L� 1 DRAWING INFPRMATION DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN DRAW'INO NUMBER -1 CEI 'IN NUMRFR 09 -1-5 PROPOSED 5'- 0 "FYPE "1" _ LANOSCAPE BUFFER - -- SEE SHEETS L-1 & L -2 - iL 11 REED ARIA PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA MOUNT A-3-.2 NOTE. CONTOUR LINES ARE NDT SHOWN FOR CLARITY !C' SEE t NTDTIR LINES PLEASE REFERENCE C -I ENLARGED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SIGN MOUNTED ON GATE (TYP)' - A_3.5 ,E) TREED AREA 0 — PROPOSED SFk- DIESEL - EMERGENCY BACK -UP _ - GENERATOR, -j- A4' PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB A33' IEl UNDERORD.IND TELCO TO SHELTER (EI CONCRETE - PAD (E) PUILDINO �. -- OVERHANG - - Lj I l i -� I /L �JI!' _ IE)EQUIPMENT . ! SHELTER -- i SHE PROPOSED VERIZON _ fEI -- WIRELESS EQUIPMENT - - PROPOSED COA %LADDER ON, NORTH FACE OF (E) LATTICE--' TOWER 2 -- ,A "3.3 ! L' IE)IREEU AREA PLAN N ORTI I veriZonwireless we naw slop working for you REALC ®M FLANS PREPARED BY TE �® EDe NER91FOp EX RO IECT INFC' TAC LAKELAND 561 t I'ANORAfviA Dk SE AUBURN, WA98092 PIERCE COUNTY ScUED LOU ,III' ZONING PERMIT REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY =C h PROPOSEDPOWERAND ' TELCO ROUTE TO SHELTER -2 -., A -3.1 IE; GRAVFI PROPOSED 5•- 0 "x4' -0" `]RIVF WAY CONCRETE STOOP -. QU d4 IS S UE'.J FOR ZONING PERMIT AJB MWO odel 05 -22 -05 \ DRA / R/ QA tl�l ED O x 16' -0" EQUIPMENT 155 UEDFOR CLIENT REALW /D� SHELTER SHELTER (FOUNUNDATION PER MVO MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS) A-3 D\ PROPOSED CABLE RACEWAY' 1-` - a� A -1.4 -- - D \� PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA A3- PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE T - a A3t ` a� i D AREA AREA LANOg�4PE , I F! CHAIN LINE FENCE WITH BARRED AND RAZOR WIRE — a PROPOSED VERIZON --- -- WI RELESS ANTENNAS' =_ 10 11 I A.31 A-31 A-3.1 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA MOUNT A-3-.2 NOTE. CONTOUR LINES ARE NDT SHOWN FOR CLARITY !C' SEE t NTDTIR LINES PLEASE REFERENCE C -I ENLARGED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SIGN MOUNTED ON GATE (TYP)' - A_3.5 ,E) TREED AREA 0 — PROPOSED SFk- DIESEL - EMERGENCY BACK -UP _ - GENERATOR, -j- A4' PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB A33' IEl UNDERORD.IND TELCO TO SHELTER (EI CONCRETE - PAD (E) PUILDINO �. -- OVERHANG - - Lj I l i -� I /L �JI!' _ IE)EQUIPMENT . ! SHELTER -- i SHE PROPOSED VERIZON _ fEI -- WIRELESS EQUIPMENT - - PROPOSED COA %LADDER ON, NORTH FACE OF (E) LATTICE--' TOWER 2 -- ,A "3.3 ! L' IE)IREEU AREA PLAN N ORTI I veriZonwireless we naw slop working for you REALC ®M FLANS PREPARED BY TE �® EDe NER91FOp EX RO IECT INFC' TAC LAKELAND 561 t I'ANORAfviA Dk SE AUBURN, WA98092 PIERCE COUNTY ScUED LOU ,III' ZONING PERMIT REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY =C h L DRAW14BY CHh ADV J CDRA I DRA I MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 I ICENBURE - y 2 ••��'�' °'= fst 1i�8N1 I E•vIEFS V -I DRAWING INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN DRAWING IJUMBER A-1.1 GEIJOB NUMBER 00 -56315 QU 06-0? -09 IS S UE'.J FOR ZONING PERMIT AJB MWO Q 05 -22 -05 `SSUEDFGR CLIENT RE IEW DRA MWO QA 05-05 -0° 155 UEDFOR CLIENT REALW DRA MVO L DRAW14BY CHh ADV J CDRA I DRA I MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 I ICENBURE - y 2 ••��'�' °'= fst 1i�8N1 I E•vIEFS V -I DRAWING INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN DRAWING IJUMBER A-1.1 GEIJOB NUMBER 00 -56315 MOUNTED SIGN MOUNTED ON GATE (TYPj Go verizon wireress '-__- NCRETF SLge - we neversroP VmrF'n0 for you - REALC0M erg PLANS PREPARED Hl 2 O — PROPOSED 5OkW DIESEL EE - - - EMERGENCY BACK -UP - GENERATOR 1 -"'-- Al " PRG.CCT INE'J _ PROPOSED 5' -0 "x4'.0" CONCRETE STOOP - PROPOSED CONCRETE SL4e A -33 TAC LAKELAND _ PROPOSED POWER AND - _ - TELCOROUTETO --- EQUIPMENT, IEjDNUERGRUUNU SBAUBURN, WA 9809, L ENT 5 - TELCO TO SIICLTCF di` ER PIEFCE C GUN S d/1 ! ISSUFI FOR \di1 PROPOSED - -- ZONING PERMIT \ EQUIPMENT SHELTER dr\ (FOUNDATION PER IFI GRPVFI - - -- - --- -- - - -- _ t j REV =DATE _DESI,RIPTIGN =6Y =C K DRIVEWAY dl MANUFAI;TURERS -- - - _ `dam `EQUIR ---- - - REQUIREMENTS) ----- - -- A -3 _ ICI BUILDING - - -- - __ OVERHANG (E)GGNGPETE PAD - WS rDRAWN BY CHI =All � DRA URA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 PROPOSED VERIZON y� PROPOSED CABLE RACEWAY 'A 34 ) T WIRELESS EQUIPMENT IS) EQUIPMENT _ I SHE' TER DRAWING INFORMATION L PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA 3 7 _ - - 'EI SHED PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ;1 �- - _ DRAWING TITLE A31 COMPOUND PLAN .NOTE: (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH - _ _ ,I CORAN'NG NJMBER CON'OJR .INES AHE NOT SHOWN BARBED AND RA20R WIRE TO L NFOP S PAiEAFE RLF EFFNCETOUR 10- A-1.2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AEI IOR NU1.18ER 09 -56315 22,,34 SCALE 112 - 1 " I iixl]SCALE 114' =1' -0' Q 06 -03 -09 Ic SUE FOR 'ONING PERMIT AJB MWO Q9o5-22-o9 (:L ISSUCE RF (ENT FVIEOR IN DFA MWO QA 05-05 -09 1SSUFD FOR t 1LENI RLVCII pR4 M \NO rDRAWN BY CHI =All � DRA URA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 PROPOSED VERIZON y� PROPOSED CABLE RACEWAY 'A 34 ) T WIRELESS EQUIPMENT IS) EQUIPMENT _ I SHE' TER DRAWING INFORMATION L PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA 3 7 _ - - 'EI SHED PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ;1 �- - _ DRAWING TITLE A31 COMPOUND PLAN .NOTE: (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH - _ _ ,I CORAN'NG NJMBER CON'OJR .INES AHE NOT SHOWN BARBED AND RA20R WIRE TO L NFOP S PAiEAFE RLF EFFNCETOUR 10- A-1.2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AEI IOR NU1.18ER 09 -56315 22,,34 SCALE 112 - 1 " I iixl]SCALE 114' =1' -0' COAX LENGTH SCHEDULE SECTOR LENGTH #CDAX DIAMETER ALPHA -122 4 1NEA') i18" BETA -122' 1(NEW) ]IB' GAMMA x122' 11 NEW) 7!8' PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN AN 1 ENNA (.OUR_ IUTAI 9 EXISTING 0 NEW 9 S ALPHA IT AZIMUTH 270' I1 ♦` rte, GAMMA NOTE.. ANTENNAS SHALL BE FAINTED TO MATCH (El LATTICE TOWER (NON- RE =LEC1 VE 'PE') (E I PAD 10 ANTENNAS - PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS 10 ''A -3.1 A-3.1 A -31 -- PROPOSED ANTENNA MOUNT 1 A -3 2 2 (Ei9 0 LATTICETnWER — (El MICROWAVE ANTENNA— � II PROPOSED VERTICAL COAX LADDER '- A_33 \•I. PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE A31 PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA IF I FOU IPMEN- SHEI TER PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT SHELTER PROPOSED U0kW EMERGENCY BACK -UP BACK -UP GENERATOR; 1 III A -4 H _� ANTENNA PLAN 1 2 1 WEST ELEVATION P'I , I -1 f-- - _ TOP DF STRUCTURE 1 EL tiT'9" AGL' — IE) CHAIN LINK FE-F —H BARBED AND RAZOR ARE TOP OF LATTICE TOWER EL 99' -0" AGE ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT EL 92' -0" A Y GRADE_`T / U -0" ASSUMED) D) V@ifZOn wireless We nsveslap wxWng Ior you RA E L C 0 M PI ANS PREPARED BY �� a o�urE wuo iuc. PROJECT INFO TAC LAKELAND 5811 PANORAMA DR SF A NBLIRN, — 98091 PIERCE COUNT) ISSUED FOR CZONING PERMIT REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION —BY =t;K mm�il Em m mm m DRAWN BY CH+. API CDNA DRA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 LICENSURF a1a a 44L a - _ •a as'aur` �4 +•d�lir�� aYae DRAWING INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE CINEST ELEVATION & ANTENNA PLAN DRAWING NUMBER A 0 CEI J06 NUMBER 03 00215 e 1E ' -E 1c ' -I (EQUIPMENT SHELTER - 5'- 0'x5' -0" CONCRETE STOOP (2,1l2 SS 0 BOLTS FOR ANTENNA MOUNTING FT ^ - `}III I' ICE BRIDGE IILIII- SH FILL FIT F -l' Si �PPORT PIPF HOT DIPPED GAI 5 GIPS ANTENNA 22x34 SC4LE V = I -F 1, DOOR veriZon wireless we „awl :mv wcvuna ro� w� REALC0M FLANSPFEPAREDBY PROJECT INFO TAC LAKELAND 5811 PANORAMA DR SE n, (BURN, WA 9809, PIERCE COUNT" ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT :FEV -DATE C DESCRIPTION VENT I 1 2 WIDE GABLE � 42 THHN STRANDEC ADDER TIP 1 GEL,N WIRE QD O !I �iT ISSUED FOR A T — L� I Q05 - - - PRnpOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EOUIPMENT (EQUIPMENT SHELTER - 5'- 0'x5' -0" CONCRETE STOOP (2,1l2 SS 0 BOLTS FOR ANTENNA MOUNTING FT ^ - `}III I' ICE BRIDGE IILIII- SH FILL FIT F -l' Si �PPORT PIPF HOT DIPPED GAI 5 GIPS ANTENNA 22x34 SC4LE V = I -F 1, DOOR veriZon wireless we „awl :mv wcvuna ro� w� REALC0M FLANSPFEPAREDBY PROJECT INFO TAC LAKELAND 5811 PANORAMA DR SE n, (BURN, WA 9809, PIERCE COUNT" ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT :FEV -DATE C DESCRIPTION r DRAWN-BY CHS 4PV DRA DNA I MWO URRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 Ell —1—FIE—E I IcEratiuRL I •'��I9I��Cf(if{� f I �' CRPW'ING INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER A ®3 0 1 CEI JOB NLMHER )9-5615 13 QD O O, CJ -CS I ISSUED FOR A AJR M MWO Q05 - -22 -0E ( (GHENT REVIEW D DR4 M MWO QA 0 05 -05 -09 I IC LSIENT DOE EVIEW U U,,, M MWG DRAWN-BY CHS 4PV DRA DNA I MWO URRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 Ell —1—FIE—E I IcEratiuRL I •'��I9I��Cf(if{� f I �' CRPW'ING INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER A ®3 0 1 CEI JOB NLMHER )9-5615 "I. FRONT SIDES BACK ICE BELL GE EXTEN&CN WHERE APPLICABLE - FRONT SIDE BACI. _ I -a -HOT DIPPED GNLVANIZED STEEL Ir� - TAP f RONI GRATING FROM STRUCTURE TO A J� - -- EQUIPMENT U- BOLTED TO PIPE TOP H - I COLUMNS Top 278 "0 D HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PIPE FOR ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT g W1 CAP _ - -- ANTENNA 11 ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA w - m 22AS4 II_ = 1' -P :1.17 114 1 ^z.3a 112• - 1' -0" Hxi] lf4" = 1' -0" 22a i4 N.' _ ,• -6" NaTe 3 1l1'aP .14 GAI V SILL 1 h2 SOLID TINNED GROUND W'RE TO F LATE WI HOLES FOR I, -,'I BE FAD WELDED FROM EACH _' -112 'C EXP BOLTS,1il'.' - -- -•'I - VALMONT COAX SUPPORT COLUMNS TO GROUND CAGE - RING - RLC HANCEP !E) CON CRFTE SLAB OR NI C ONCRETE EXPANSION - !112= T 1 12'(3.12 ".iNf;4(1R EDITVVI'."' - 1!2 "0 RP BO1 TS EXPOSURL ABOVL TOP Of -1LR MIN 4' EMBED ?li6 TYR 2 PER - III BRIDGE tiHFPQRI PIPE SUPPDPT FOUNDATION (RAW EARTH APPLICATION) ICE BRIDGE DETAIL 7 NO D 22x34 SCALE, 316 " - 1 -0 111117 SCALE 3116" = 1' -6" 22x34 SCALE- 112 1' -0" 11r17 SCALE 114'•= 1' -0" FINISH GRADE OR AC PAVING MAT( ;H tit DPE THIL -N-C OF IKISTING UNDISTURBED " -8' COMPACTED BACNFILL PER NATIVE 80 MIN WSD(1T 9- 6314!3) t;()I4PAf.TFD TO MIN OF GA`I, MAX UNIT Wi PER ASTM1 D1557 I — UTILITY WARWNG TAPE DIRECT 6URIED 4 "SCHEDULE aO GRAY PVC TELEPHONE 0.1411111 ZONE BEDDING PER WSDGT 9 -03 12(31 COMPACTED TO MIN 95'P OF MAk UNIT WT PER A STH D'155] DIRECI BURILU 3 "PvC MIN SCHEDULE 46 EL ECTRICAI CONDUIT tM RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL R ISERS AND 3G" NOTES RAPIDS SWEEPS Ii VERIFY ALL TRENCH!1JG FEOUIREMENTS -LR LOCAL UI ILITEC -) ;,AL, BEFORE YOU DIG' CONTACT LCCAL UTILITY COMPANY NOT USED 3 UNDERGROUND POWER /TELCO 2 NOT USED verizOflwireless w �ArPf :mP.�xl�a rafrol. REALC0M PLANS PREPARED B'f ru ®® EO�NERSIFOo Evc SID' BACK � -t,•�_ ... w. i.e LE PROJECT INFO 1J 114 - 1 -0 g TAC LAKELAND 581' PANORAMA DR SE AUBURN, *A98092 PIERCE COUNT) r IsF ul-D FuR IL ZONING PERMIT CDRAWNBY CHh =APV DRA DRA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE CJ 06 -03 -09 LICENSURE lYf'te'�� DRAWING INFORMATION - DRAWINC-TIT,E CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OR 4VV'N,; NUMBER ®3.1 0 1 CEI JUB NUKIBFR 09 -56315 Q O6 -Oi -09 ISSUED FOR Z(1NING PFRMII ALB MWO 6 00 ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW DRA MWO Qq 0505.09 ISSUED NORIEW ILIENU DRA MWD CDRAWNBY CHh =APV DRA DRA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE CJ 06 -03 -09 LICENSURE lYf'te'�� DRAWING INFORMATION - DRAWINC-TIT,E CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OR 4VV'N,; NUMBER ®3.1 0 1 CEI JUB NUKIBFR 09 -56315 VERIZON ANTENNA INFORMATION r_ 1ON19Akq I.r_aiO4 1.191VAre119IMRgI SEE DRAINING 151152 FOR TIE -BACK CONNECTION HARDWARE ITEM QTY TIP HEIGHT ANTENNA 5 MECHANICAL NO OF COAX 9; ` SECTOR OTY FT AGE LENGTH AZIMUTH DOWN TILT COAX RUNS SIZE ANTENNA ALFHA 1 911-0" /' -IC SItl" 270 3- 1 n8'. SEE DETAIL .A -3I s 1 92 0" 4' -13,16 270 0 1 716" SEE DE-All IMA -3 1 112" FLATWASHER 1 92'.0" 51-111/8• 270' 3' 1 I.6' SEE DETAIL 1A -3 1 BETA 1 92' -0" 7' -10 Spa' 50' 3 1 718'. SEE DETAIL 9!A 3 i 4" V- GLARIP 1 92'0" 4'- 13!16" IS 0' 2" V -CLAMP 718' SEE DETAIL 101A31 11 1 92' -0' 5- 111/8" 50' 3- ]!a' SEED TAI lIA -3 1 GAMMA I 92' -0' /- '.05!8' le0' s 1 718" SEE DET,11 9/A -3 1 0 ee "2P 4 920" a'- 13!16" 160- > I 714' SEE DCTAIL 1nlA -3 1 91 -0 ' S' -11 1!6" '6a 1 711' SEE DETAIL IVA -J I L;PS I TBD 1 718' SEE DETAIL 31A -3 r_ 1ON19Akq I.r_aiO4 1.191VAre119IMRgI SEE DRAINING 151152 FOR TIE -BACK CONNECTION HARDWARE (15) ANTENNA MOUNT 4 112 "0 D PIPE (REF) I I I I I I I I C HARDWARE LIST 17 A 3JG n'_Vr �6 E/IED UEO- 5HEa nL 1D NT I Iw' �GREHM'1.1,'ILI o I • n. n1a� Gre s; PARTS LIST LACY I AT, PLATE WELDnI[i r LD.�IPE, IOE']' O GLE eV I TOTAL WT.: 185# I NOTES: ID 3 PE ,_T 4 „L TkON111 EGE 2 I'll -11 11 —ISTAIIII I,,, i ELEI SLOPE' FOR ALTE'S - TI oo' E -1IIJD , II IPFL cmI-EL I III-ED \ V v i61 1 IV` /^7) 5 V� ✓111f ;4) 1c, - 0 0 ELEVATION PARTS LIST ITEM QTY PART NO DESCRIPTION LENGTH 5 1 1 6) STRUT ARM 9; ` 72304 (15) ANTENNA MOUNT 4 112 "0 D PIPE (REF) I I I I I I I I C HARDWARE LIST 17 A 3JG n'_Vr �6 E/IED UEO- 5HEa nL 1D NT I Iw' �GREHM'1.1,'ILI o I • n. n1a� Gre s; PARTS LIST LACY I AT, PLATE WELDnI[i r LD.�IPE, IOE']' O GLE eV I TOTAL WT.: 185# I NOTES: ID 3 PE ,_T 4 „L TkON111 EGE 2 I'll -11 11 —ISTAIIII I,,, i ELEI SLOPE' FOR ALTE'S - TI oo' E -1IIJD , II IPFL cmI-EL I III-ED \ V v i61 1 IV` /^7) 5 V� ✓111f ;4) 1c, - 0 0 ELEVATION PARTS LIST ITEM QTY PART NO DESCRIPTION LENGTH WEIGHT 1 1 151364 STRUT ARM 72304 1 151367 66” MOUNTING ARM PJB 53 434 3 1 1113F9 54" MOUNTING ARM h1WO 48 20# 05 -05 -09 5 151246 11TH -BOLT ASSEMBLY 1104 s 20 d 12500 v2" NUT 0 054 6 2C 312062 112" FLATWASHER C 01# 7 20 312063 112 " OCKWASHER Only 6 _ 139395 1114" SCH 40 PIPE 10',i LONG 2600>< 0 4 '6,1064 4" V- GLARIP 0 Pas 10 4 116165 2" V -CLAMP 0 774 11 1 2 123614 3" FLAT DISK CLAMP 1 514 1, 115765 5" V -CLAMF 1 109 13 14 'S 16 12 ::4 14'069 112" A, 4" BOLT -112" X ?" BOLT '12" T b 112 BOLT 1 4" FLA' DISK I- LAME PLATE 0 29# 141068 141074 0 ee "2P 4 0 36# _ 1275P< 2 484 TOTA_ WEIGHT 207 674 I veriZ Awireless We nerer stW I+�MV1g for ynu REALC0M PLANS PREPARED BY _ COa NEPSVONEN PROJECT INFO TACLAKELAND 6811 PANORAM.v DR EE AUBURN WA 98092 PTRCE COUNTY CiSFNEDFOR ZONING PERMIT e :DRAWN BY GHK =APV EEEEEEEE DRP DRA MWC :CURRENT ISSJEDATE 06 -03 -09 :LIGENSURE 1 cI. -ITT :DRAW N13 INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE 711NSTRUCTION DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER A-3.2 F _0 CEI JOB N IMBER 09 -56315 Q CL,_03 -09 ISSUED FOR :LINING FERMIT PJB MWO Q 05 -22 -09 ISSUED FOR L,LIENT REVIEW DRA h1WO aA 05 -05 -09 ISSUED FOR �LIENI REVIFVJ DRA MWO :DRAWN BY GHK =APV EEEEEEEE DRP DRA MWC :CURRENT ISSJEDATE 06 -03 -09 :LIGENSURE 1 cI. -ITT :DRAW N13 INFORMATION DRAWING TITLE 711NSTRUCTION DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER A-3.2 F _0 CEI JOB N IMBER 09 -56315 r OF 1 114' MINI IS CRUSHED ROCK TOP LAYER COMPAC -EC 95 OVER WEED BARRIER EMIL WEED HARRIER - 2" OF 1 114" MINUS CRUSHEDROCK UNDER LAYER ! OR.GINAL GRADE�j� EDGE OF CRUSHED - — - ROCK SURFACE --- -- _ UNDISTURBED SO L 6' ENGINEERED FILL COMPACTED --,, — CRUSHED ROCK SURFACE DETAIL 1 5 22r34 SCALE 112"=1' -0" 11,, I] SCALE X14 " =1' 0" TOWER DIAGC ■ COAX CABLE LADDER 22x34 SCALE NTS 11107 SCALE PARTS LIST ITEM OTY PART NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHT i 2 A VERTICAL LADDER ARGUE E® B C HORIZONTAL LADDER CHANNEL E® 3 2 163940 VERTICAL ANGLE ( NNEC.T�0N PI ATE 0 ]SA 4 D 311018 318' h 1 114" BOLT 0 05N 5 D 312023 318" LOCK WASHFR 9 Big 6 D 154413 318" PLAIN NUT C 031! 7 E 1G2821 DIAGONAL CONNECTION PLATE 1634 8 E 163064 112" X 6" J -BOL I U 66N 9 E 31_063 112" _OCK WASHER U 01p 10 1 E 312500 V2'PLAINNUT OUSp I . �j DETAIL A 4f _ I-f a ®' e U DETAIL C E\ w \\\ \ON DETAIL 6 blvl C; 1 112" CI N A CONCHEIE SLAB IN/ x4 'a 1.. ^' n C EACH WAY —, - 117 RAU IIS ITYPI —_ -- ' [, t - 4 GRAVEL OVER LANDSCAPE WEED BARRIER 6' COMPACTED AGGREGATE TO 959,. - LANDGr qpE *EEO 6ARFIEF MAX UNIT *EIGHT PER 4ST11 D155] UNU1S I URBED NA I It /E SOIL GENERATOR SLAB SECTION TO �a 12'0C EACH WAY "i pa VOID DEPTH) `SEE CONCRETE NOTES 8 STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES ON SHEET G -1 � A GE (NERATOR SLAB STEEL LAYOUT 12x34 SCALE 112 = 1' -0' 11.17 SCALE 114 " = 1 ' 0 Ver%ZORwireless vrerslep wohung fa you REALC0M PLANS PREPARED BY 1►s � atueew .m ire PROJECTINFO TACLAKELAND 5811 PANORAMA DR SE AUBURN, WA 98092 4 PIERCE COUSITY ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT � R EV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY =CK mm—mm mm—mm E® ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT ®® E® ®® M® REVI ®® [DRAWNIT, CHK API � CURA I IRA MWO CURRENTISSUE UATE 06 -03 -09 ucENSURE t��'uc�4♦ - ♦��PpO „s�:.i SQL♦ DRAWING INFORMATION n DRAINING `ITLE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER A ®3.3 1 0 ED JOB NUMBER - -" NOTE —INSTALL TEC-aO ED ROD PROTECTOR veriLonwireiess we ne�elaroo wwwne r��' ALL CABLE TRAY MUST BE ITYP OF ..) ID NDT TLIRIJLAR - -�- -- - 5:I6 " -18 HARDWARE - � - ALL THREADED ROD (TIP OF 21 _ HARDWARE - �° R E L it ® M (TIP OF 21 - - PI_ANS PREPARED81 / vt! HANGER SUPPORT _ pa GROUNDING JUIIIPEH - - (TYP Of 21 - PRCUECT INFO I' —SPLICE EXTENSION CLAMP 1TYa OF 1) -- - - RUNWAI SUPPORT KIT INCLUDES III HANGEk SUPPORTS K HARDWARE I -PRIAL TAC LAKELAND SF_ IC E Ell ENSIUN [;l AMP 'IT INCLUDES - _ ' ASTM .1570 STRUCTURAI STEEL FINISH YELLOW ZIN- DICHROMATE IVZNI 5811 PANORAMA OR SE AU.1RN .—F092 RUNWAY CLAMPS 8 5116 " -16 HARDWARE MATERIAL STRUCTURAL STEEL FINISH PILkCE COVN11 Y ELL LOW YELLOW ZINC DICHROMATE IYZNI ISSUED FOP. r LZONING PERMIT REV Z OA; H = DESCRIPTION =BY =Ch SPLICE EXTENSION DETAIL 4 RUNWAY SUPPORT DETAIL 3 22x34 SCALE NTS 11111 SCALE NTI 22x.14 SCALE NIS 111r17 SCALE ITS Q 08 -03 -09 ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT AjS MOO \ �l A / - TOR ZONTAL TEF SPLICE KIT INCLUDES j 121 C AM 5&318 16 HARDWARE MATERIAL ASTM AIII STRUCTURAL STEEL f INISIi YELLOW ZINC DICHROMATE (YZN) RUNWAY WALL SUPPORT FU INCLUDES I1 11NC 1 F 9RAC hFT I."i J -Bn1 T5 b 5116' 1e HARDWARE MATERIAL AS TM AS6 STRUCTURAL STEEL ANGLE FINISH TELCO GREY COWDEU COAL 05 -22 -09 SSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW DRA I"' A Q 05 -OS -09 155UFD FOR CLIENT REVIEW DRA MOD DRAWN BY INK —APV DRA DRA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 114 "a 2 "r 2" ANGLE- IIr 06 -03 -09 t J J t ♦r t u,`p ♦N > < -- ' ' " SEE EXPLODED VIEW .. -/ � i/ - - : _ 'e // - (TYP JF21- - - I III - i - - n� DRAVI INC INFORMATION - — 91'R'- 18HARDWARE ' - HORIZONTAL TEE SPLICE ' CLAMP(- 1P0F4i _ l� _ - - DRAWING TITLE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS - ro• -I E H AROwIARF e PAWING NUMBER HORIZONTAL TEE SPLICE DETAIL RUNWAY WALL SUPPORT DETAIL 2:x34 SCALE NTS I I', 17 SCALE NTS 2204 SCALE NT5 111>17SCAILE NTS CEI JOB NUMBER 09- 56.115 USED USED NOTICE 12 NOT_USED 91 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR WORKING IN THE AREA OF ANTENNAS ALL PERSONNEL ENTERING THIS SITE MUST BE AUTHORIZED OBEY ALL POSTED SIGNS ASSUME ALL ANTENNAS ARE ACTIVE MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 3 FEET CLEARANCE FROM ANTENNAS NOTICE E SIGN 4 NOTICE RADIO FREQUENCY BEYOND THIS POINT MAY EXCEED THE FCC GENERAL PUBLIC EXPOSURE LIMIT OER W ALL NGLE RAGID FREOUENCGinDLLiNER E�nP.ONMENTS n NOTICE SIGN 11 USED WARNING BEYOND THIS POIN- RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS AT THIS SITE EXCEED THE FCC RULES FOR HUP.4AID EXPOS URE 10 7 RF WARNING SIGN 6 - SCALE NTS NOTICE 4, UIDELI GNES FOR WORKING IN RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIRONMENTS FIA onnel stloslc h ove IEMS' nnnel enter nq th E s le must ba author z¢d s 62+ Obey all posted "I neeeme all antennas are aer ee vorh antennas ns.ify owners and tlisable appropnale � 8ansm hers ng on � Maintain minimum 3'aet ulearanw from a9 antenna= Do aof slop w from orantennaa per oA, RF moMiors whsle vrorking near an(eN�s �. Never operate l4ese slat on anteut"'ahiendes4 Upment rosa�Oparanon y k, De not operete — NOTICE SIGN 2 ver" iZonm eie5s We rever stop HnMnB fm You REALC0M PLANS PREPARED NY �cpo NEA9TO�NE PSZO.;ECl INTO USED — TAG LAKELAND ALE ISfS 11 1Z S( ALE NT SBA I PANORNA 9 0 SE CAUTION AUE3URN WA 9tl6 °2 PIERCE C9UNT Y ISSUED FOR ZONING PERMIT REV :DATE - UFSGRIP110N —BY -CK flsnd Ibis peinl ISSUED FOP. ey Aug MWO 0 O6 -G3.09 ZGNING PERMIT Ratl+o Ire4 tleFCC runes kx iwman ISSUED FOR may excee DRA MWO exposure Q 05 -22 -08 CLIENT REVIEW { SSUED FOR PRA MIND _ solely, oroev atl pcsiutl sg s and Q OS -05-09 CLIENT REVIEW 9 de kng n ma�a cy DRAWN BY CHK �APV ..... ...... DRA pRA MWO CURRENT ISSUE DATE 06 -03 -09 CAUTION SIGN �1"ENSURF ;SCALE NITS — 11 17 SCALE NT5 V o "Al— IN CASE OF EMERGENCY DRAW,NGINF�RM14A IQN UL - CALL uTee' -"A i. N . O . C . C . IRA WINO T{TLE SIGNAGE 1 -800- 264 -6620 DRAWINGNDMgER- A -3.5 0 1 0 &563M15 ,IOC SIGN crl icBNUMBER GENERAL A LANDSCAPE FLAN IS BASEL ON SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY CARTFR- HURGESS ALL SHE PLAN DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS, BUILDING DINSENSIONS AND SITE DEVE_OPMFNT SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO INSULATION SC_ OPE OF WORK A F MATERIAL - LABOR LOUIPMENT AND RELATED R ME NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH SOIL FIT ALL S, F M AT ION PLACEMENT AND GRADING OF - OPSOIL MATERIAL PLACEMENT AND GRADING OF DILL MATERIAL RIAt- ITT REQUIRED), PLACEMENT OF SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIAL FERTILIZERS, STAKING AND MULCH. PROTECTION, MAINTENANCE, GUARANTEE, CLEANUP, DEBRIS REMOVAL, ANDRELATED ITEMS NECESSARY OP INCIDENTAL In COMPLEIL THE WOR, SHOWN AND SPECIFIED OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS AND INS I ALL PER LOCAL MUNICIPAL CODE AS WELL AS NEIGHBORHOOD CODES COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AND PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE SITE PREPARATION A PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS ON SITE DURING [ONSTRUGTION BY'ENCING OFF WITH 4' TFMPORAPY ORANGE POLY FENCING FOR DAMAGES F OR RISS OR INJURY SEE (NOTE 19 U I F THE SITE TO BE CI FARED AND GRUBBED OF ALL VEGETATION, PAVING, GRAVEL BASE AND CLTHEF DEBRIS NOT TO REMAIN SHE GRADES ARE 10 BE SET PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION C SUB GRADES TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN 0 10 FOOT PER SITE GRADING PLAN, PER LANDSCAPE PLAN AND FINISH GRADE SPECIFICAT'DNS BELOW. MINUS DEPTH OF TOE SOIL FI_L AND MULCH SPECIFIED D t' WEEP HOLES TO BE PROV•DED IN CURBS SPACES A MA IMUM OF 10' 0 C RESPONSIBILITY A IT I IE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECI ION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY CX ISTING PLANT MATERIAL DFSIGNATFD FOR PRFPERVAI ION, AND SAFETY OF THE GENERAL PHBLIC B THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH AL_ OTHER I RAGES AS NEEDED C UTILITIES THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE UNDERGROUND CHIT TIES LOCATOR SERVICE (1 -800- 424 -5555; PRIOR TO COMMENC INC NIOPK HE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECT ION OF AND AN) ' DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES HE SHALL VFRI ', 1 HIT I CICATION OI UI II II ITS WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A BEFORE PROCLLDING WITH ANY WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PERTAINING TO 1 HL LOCATION OF WALLS, VAULTS, LIGHT STANDARDS, HYDRANTS, AND ANY OTHER EXIST INC; CONDI110NS, INCLUDING ADVERSE DRAINAGE SHOULD ANY ERRORS OR CONFLIC`S IN DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS OCCUR THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYTHE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY MATERIALS A PLANTMATERIALSHALL C JNFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERY MAP. GRADES AND STANDARDS AS PUBLISHED IN THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STI, :I' ANDAS NNTEDnN DRAWNNr, AS FOI I OWS B At I TREES TO BE SFI F EUPFORTING, LAII I I I ULL I(LADS ASK LEADERS IN TACT - AI I SHRUBS TREES, AND GROUND COVER -O BE FULL AND BUSHY, ALL TREES TO BE STRAIGHT 'PUN" WITH I EADER IN IACT, EXCEPT MULTIH RUNK TREES WHICH MAY HAVE IRREGULAR TRUNKS ALL ROOT BALLS SHALL BE IN TACT AND HAVE NO MORE THAN 10D. CLAY AND I OR SILT CONTENT AND BE FREE OF WEEDS G PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE RE.;ECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE .AND9CAPF ARCHITECT AND 1 OR OWNER DUE TO CONDITIONS, FROM OR DAMAGE BEFORE OR AFTER PLANTING TOPSOIL A 1EDPPGROVESTWO-WAITI'S011 MIX 12n LOAHIk 113 CEDAR GROVECOMPOSTEUMULCHIDR AI= PROVED EQUAL FILL MATERIAL A SANDY I CAM MATFRIAI W HH LESS - HAN f CLAY AND' OR SILT CONTENT AND FREE RUCK AND DEBRIS VER 2 INCH DIAN1El ER MULCH A GROCO COMPOSTED MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL FERTILIZERS AND AMENDMENTS A WALT ORGANIC FERTILIZER OR APPROVED EQUAL USE FERTILISER SPECIFIED FOR PLANT TYPE B LINSEY GREENSAND OR APPROVED EQUAL C NORTH ATLANTIC KELP MEAL ORAPPROVED EQUAL D GROUND LIMESTONE E MONTANA Rni," PHOSPHATE OR APPROVED ELICIT EROSION CONTROL NETTING A LANDLOA 40]ICR140]GT EEGRAOALLI FRfISION CONTROL BLANKE I T OR APPROVED EULIALT MAD OF P UL YPROPYLENL MLSH POLYMER A TERRA FLORA'S (360 - 297- 8015, 'TERRA SORE MEDIUM FIDROGEL" PILYMERS BY PLANT HEALTH CARE INC, OR APPROVED Lu11A1 LANDSCAPE NOTES _XECUTION A SOIL PREPARATION 5 IN AREAS WITH NATIVE `OPSOIL REMAINING UNDISTURBED AMEND SOIL IN PLANTING HOLE PER DETAILS ANO AS FOLLOWS ALONG WITH ADDING AMFNDMFNTS S PFC - BELOW THER AREAS ATRATE 5 IEIS OW A LEPTHOF12ILCHES BEEN REMOVED ORDISI TRIPLE. P TE BEDSAFOLLOWS SCARIFYTn PREPARE LANIEF S 4 DEPTH OF f21NC INCHES AND APP) Y A MINIMUM OF A INC cLER COMPACTION) SPECIFIED H PER OFS EC 5 ) t COMPOSTED MULCH ALONG WITH NTT FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS PERMTS SQUARE FEET (20 LBSJERSEV GREEN SANG, N LBS NORTH AI _ANTIC CELT MEAL, E LBS GROUND LIMESTONE 25 LBS MONTANA ROCK PHOSPHATE) AND RO-OVATE INTO THE TOP 12" INCHES OF THE SUBSOIL 'HEN APPLY 4' INCHES OF SPECIFIED TOPSO'L 10 PROVIDE FOR EASE OF GRADING AND A HEALTHY 70PSOI1 MEDIUM IF HEAVY CLAY IS ENCOUNTEREU, Ell HER REMOVE CLAY OF TILL IN ALL THE FOLLOWING 1" INCH CnMPOSl ED MULCH, 2 INCHES DY50 MIX OF WASHER SAND k ,8 -INCH PEA GRAVEL, ANC AMENDMENTS, INSTEAD OF IHE4' INCHES OF COMPOS', -PEN APP, f TOPSOIL AS SPEC IFIED REMOVE ALL DEBRI— NCIROCKOVIPR 2" ROUGH GRADING A ALL AREAS SHALI BE ROUGH GRADED WITHIN 011: FOOT BEFORE PLANTING All GRADES SHALL PRODUCF FOSITIVF DRAINAGF AWAY FROM SUIT DING AND THROUGH ALL PLANTER AREAS TO AVOID LOW SPOTS AND SI ANDINGWATER AREAS SHALL HE GRADED SUCH THAT NEW GRADES MEET AND BLEND NATURALLY WAIL THEEMSHUGGRADES ONSLOPFSGREATER',HAN21 INSTALL SPEC FIED EROSION CONTROL NETTING PLH MANUFACTURER RFCOMMFNDHTIONS FINISH GRADES A FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE FOLLOW SITE GRADING PLAN EDGE DETALS AS SPECIFIED AND MOUNTED MINIMUM OF 6INCHES IN THE CENTER OF THE BED FROM THE TOP OF CURB AND IOR PAVING PLANTING, GUYING AND STAKING (PER DETAILS AND AS FOLLOWS) A PLANT ONLY DURING SEASONS OF LOCAL, Y ACCEPTED PRACTICF CROWN OF PLANT SHALL BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER, AFTER SETT) No THAN ADJACENT SOIL C LAYOUT OF MASS PLANTINGS TER DETAIL AND MAINTAIN A 21 CLEARANCE FOR CAR OVERHANG AND FROM PAVING, WALLS CURBS, AND PROPERT'(LINES D BAREFOOT RDnT TREES SHALL BE PI ANTED ONLY BETWEEN NOVEMBER 15TH AND MAN,A 1151H AND PLANT PER STANDARD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES F IF HEAVY CLAY IS ENCOUNTERED, AMEND P,ANI HOT E BACKFILI WITH 50% NATIVE SOC AND 5CO MI %OF :.QM111KI ED MUI CH, PIA GPAVF! , AND SAND, CREATE DRAINAGE AVJAY FROM HOLE IF IT HOLDS WATER F FERTILIZE ALL PLANTINGS WITH SPECIFIED FERTILIZER PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS G AMEND PLANT HOLE BACKFILL WITH SPECIFIED POLYMER PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS H THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS))ALL SUPERVISE PRUNING OFTR- ESANESHRUBS LIMITPRUNINGTn HE OVAL OI IN.URLD TWIGS AND BRANCHES, UNLESS OI HLRWISL UIRECTED ALL INJURED TREE ROOTS 10 BL PRLJNLD VER —ALLY WITII A SHARP KNIFE BEFORE PLANNING MULCHING A PROVIDE 2',AFTER COMF ACTION) LAYER OF SPECIFIED COMPOST ED MULCH ON ALL PLANTER BEDS AND WITHIN THE ERIC LINE OF ANY NEW PLANTING MAXIMUM DEPTH OF MULCH AT THE CROWN TO BE ONE -HALF INCH FINAL CLEAN -UP A CLEAN ALL PLANTING AREAS AND FINISH RAKE WASH CLEAN ALL BLOLDING AND PAVING SURFACES THAT WERE AFFECTE'I BY LANDSCAPE INSTILLATION PLANT PROTECTION A APC] CC 1 AL_ PLA141 MAI FLAT. AGAINST HARM FROM WIND, UNUSUAL WEATHER AND THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WIT H ALGEPI ED HURT ICULI URAL PRACTICE SPECIAL PLANTING TECHNIQUES, UEFOLIAT ON III L PROOFING OR SPRAY MISTING MAY BE REQUIRED FOR UNSEASONAL PLANTING ETC B LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 15 LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF LOSS OF NUTLEY TD EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS RESULTING FROM TIE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO PROTECT THEM THE JUST VALUE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE VALUATION OF LANDSCAPE TREES SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANTS, CURRENT EDITION MAINTENANCE A THE LANDSCAPE HALL BE RESPONSIBLE DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD FOR KEEPING ALL DSc D s G WAT- FNG AND WORK INCIDENTAL THEREOF IN GOOD CONDITION By REPLANTING OTHER PLANT REPLACEMENT WATERING R WEEDING PROMOTION OF S OT PRUNING. SPRAYING RECEIVING LIFE LIND DICE NECESSARY OPERATIONS OF CARE FOR THE PROMOTION OF ROOT GROWTH AND PI ANT LIEF LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM ABOVE MAINTENANCE DUTIES N ALL LANDSCAPE FOR TVVO YEARS FROM DATE OF FINAL INSPECTIONARY B PATHS SIDEWALKS, AND ALL OTPER PAVED SURFACES BHA[ I BE KEPT CLEAN WHEN PI PUTTING AND MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ARE IIJ PROGRESS C T PF IF FCOMMUNICATION CUMPANV SET FCTS NATIVE ACCLIMA FED AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT SPECIES PLANTINGS ARE INSTALLED ONLY DURING SFALON.S OF LOCALLY ACC,EPILOPRACTICE IN THE FVFNT QF IJNFORFSEFN L;L IMATGLOGII:AI FXT RLMLS WARRANTY A WARRANT Y MAT ERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE LANDSCAPL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM EXCESSIVE C LIMAI OLOOII.AL O'NDITIONS OR WORK BY OTHER CONTRACTORS BUT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MISSING OR VANDALIZED MAI ERI ALP CUT IL THE PROJECT RECE TES A FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPEARCH.TECIALF COR OWNER 1i Il - PRUNE WITH LA APPROVAL �uswuv�l�vlrw� lac 14G UCE GALVSTEEL WIRE TYP SPACE EQUALLY I2 DOUBLE STRAND) - 2 r. E WOO "' STAINED DAR ",.QBI d DPI VE STAKES TO SUI CICILNT DEPT, 10 SUPPORT NFIOFFBALL SET CHILWN AT NURSERY I- )FLOAT 12" ABOVE TQPS011 FINISH GRADEI 2" MULCH ROLL TOP 113 OF BURLAP AWAY FROM BALL - S,'ARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE - BACKFILI MATERIAL 111) NATIVE 11: TOPSOIL) DIRMLY COMPACTED AND WATEREDIN TREE PLANTING AND STAKING Y @CI OAwireless e f W,w,l„�,a,,�� REALC0M PLANS PREPARED BY IF L Lie E vIx EE.I.e .,� PROJECT INTO TACLAKELAND 5811 PANORAMA DR BE AUBURN WA98092 PIERCE COUNTY SSUFU FOR ZONING PERMIT REV =DATE = DESCRIPTION =BY =CK 3 - 112' MULCH UNDER DRAWN BY CHIN APV —� - =HRRB r DRA DRA Mwo SET CRO \NN AT L RURAL III HFIGIII CURRENT ISSUE DATE (2" ABOVE TOPSOIL 06 -03 -09 FINISH CRADLE) _ ,)CENSURE - -__ -.2' MULCH F "'7 1 �o I -- "' '� ._�''...;_.,,r'__- - SCARIFY BOTTOM AND �Y. `e�,'s \pi - ♦'.e. -` - - -- - SIDE., OF POLE ♦ .:�,i r``1 -_ - - - -' - BACKFILL MATERIAL '- - - (112 NATIVE NATERIAL .12 TOPSOIL, FIRML) ' DE—INC INFORMATION COMPACTED AND - - WAILREDIN - - - - - -- - SCARFY AND IF-SEN _ ROCT MASON _ _ _- _ ___- _- CONTAINER MATERIAL - - L- DRAWING T'TEE LANDSCAPE NOTES& DETAILS DFHWING NUMBER SHRUB /GROUNDCOVER PLANTING L -2 0 2 22x34 SCALE NTS 1 +� 1] SCALE FILE CEI IGH I:UNIBER 09 -56315 0 Ofi- 0? -CC' SSJED FOR ZONING PERMI. AIR MAI QB 05 -22 -09 ISSUED POR CLIENT REVIEW DRA MWO QA 05 -05 -09 ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW DRA MW'O - 112' MULCH UNDER DRAWN BY CHIN APV —� - =HRRB r DRA DRA Mwo SET CRO \NN AT L RURAL III HFIGIII CURRENT ISSUE DATE (2" ABOVE TOPSOIL 06 -03 -09 FINISH CRADLE) _ ,)CENSURE - -__ -.2' MULCH F "'7 1 �o I -- "' '� ._�''...;_.,,r'__- - SCARIFY BOTTOM AND �Y. `e�,'s \pi - ♦'.e. -` - - -- - SIDE., OF POLE ♦ .:�,i r``1 -_ - - - -' - BACKFILL MATERIAL '- - - (112 NATIVE NATERIAL .12 TOPSOIL, FIRML) ' DE—INC INFORMATION COMPACTED AND - - WAILREDIN - - - - - -- - SCARFY AND IF-SEN _ ROCT MASON _ _ _- _ ___- _- CONTAINER MATERIAL - - L- DRAWING T'TEE LANDSCAPE NOTES& DETAILS DFHWING NUMBER SHRUB /GROUNDCOVER PLANTING L -2 0 2 22x34 SCALE NTS 1 +� 1] SCALE FILE CEI IGH I:UNIBER 09 -56315 Exhibit 11 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF AUBURN Emily Terrell, Pro Tem Hearing Examiner RE: Brandon Olsen/New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, dba AT &T Mobility Special Exception VAR14 -0003 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION INTRODUCTION The Applicant has applied for a Special Exception for the site preparation and installation of twelve (12) panel antennas and associated ground improvements to an existing legal nonconforming tower. The Special Exception is approved. ORAL TESTIMONY Staff Presentation Jeff Dixon, Senior Planner, described the project, the site and the reason for the non- conformity. Wireless coverage in this area is inadequate. Mr. Dixon stated the Applicant has requested an increase in the height of an existing non - conforming wireless tower on Lakeland Hill along with the installation of twelve (12) new panel antennas and associated ground support structures. The tower was originally constructed as a radio tower in 1965 when the property was located in unincorporated Pierce County. The City of Auburn annexed the property in 1998. Mr. Dixon stated the City recommends the Special Exception request rather than a Variance because the Special Exception procedures are more specific. He also described an earlier approved Special Exception from 2009 that added nine (9) panel antennas and associated ground structures. Mr. Dixon stated the City prefers co- location of antennas whenever possible to minimize the impact. Applicant Presentation George Pierce, the Applicant's agent, of Ryka Consulting stated the Applicant is requesting the Special Exception because AT &T is not able to provide adequate cell and data coverage for most of the top of Lakeland Hill. He stated he had tried to find other locations to co- locate the antenna including existing power poles, the City water tower, Lakeland Hills Elementary School and others. Mr. Pierce also stated the Applicant had reviewed locating the antenna lower on the existing tower. He stated no other location, including lower in elevation the existing tower, would provide Special Exception P. 1 Findings, Conclusion and Decision adequate height to allow the antenna to function as designed while meeting federal minimum spacing requirements. Public Comment Jae Huh of 609 59th Court SE, Auburn spoke in opposition of the project. Mr. Huh presented a packet of materials (Ex. 16). Mr. Huh's objections relate to aesthetics, safety concerns and code issues. Mr. Huh noted the existing tower at the present height is somewhat disguised by the existing mature vegetation. Mr. Huh stated the additional 20 feet of tower and 12 panel antenna will be `highly visible' and `detract from the residential character of the area'. Mr. Huh is also concerned that if the aging tower structure were to fail, it would land on the adjacent residences. He wondered if the proper building permits had been obtained from Pierce County in 1965 when the tower was originally constructed. Mr. Huh also spoke to the potential health impacts to small children and wildlife from the radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Mr. Huh noted the project's location within a dense residential neighborhood and nearby parks and the elementary school. Finally, Mr. Huh described several code inconsistencies. He felt an increase from 9 panel antennas to 12 antennas would represent a 130% increase in the structure, well over the 25% expansion cap set by the Auburn code. He also pointed to ACC 18.31.100.D.2 which requires a minimum distance between the base of a tower to the nearest residential dwelling as twice the height of the tower. Mr. Huh questioned whether the proposed increase in height conformed to the wireless communications code (ACC 18.31.100.C.5). Staff Rebuttal Jeff Dixon stated that he had submitted a public records request to Pierce County for the building permit file for the antenna. Pierce County stated they did not have the records available. Mr. Dixon stated the prior Special Exception request from 2009 had copies of the permit in the case file. He stated that a condition of approval for the project would require a building permit review to ensure safety. He also stated the tower will meet Federal Communications Commission (FCC) emissions guidelines at the base of the tower, which itself is removed from the public by a landscape buffer and a chain link fence with razor wire. Mr. Dixon stated there was no prescription in the code for determining the percentage of expansion. He noted the 2009 Special Exception defined the equipment yard as 3,300sf while his GIS measurements for this proposal were closer to 2,680sf. The additional 500sf of expansion to the equipment yard represents less than 25% of the total. Mr. Dixon stated antennas are generally exempt from height requirements. He also noted the tower is already non - conforming with respect to the minimum distance to residences. Applicant Rebuttal Mr. Pierce provided documentation from the FAA demonstrating the new tower would not be a hazard to air navigation (Ex. 14) and a copy of the company's FCC business license (Ex. 15). He stated the company meets or exceeds the FCC Special Exception p. 2 Findings, Conclusion and Decision technology requirements. He also stated the structure would comply with the 2010 International Building Code which was recently revised to require more engineering information and foundation requirements. He reiterated the existing tower is legal, non - conforming. EXHIBITS Exhibits No. 1 -13 as set forth on Page 14 of the Staff Report were admitted to the record. Additionally, the following exhibits were admitted during the hearing: Ex. 14 — Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, Federal Aviation Administration, 02/15/2011. Ex. 15 — 700 MHz Lower Band (Blocks C and D), License — WPWU989 — AT &T Mobility Spectrum, FCC, Effective 02/12/2014 Ex. 16 — Mr. Hub's submittal including: • Reasons for Objection to the Lattice Tower Structure and Use Expansion, Jae Huh • North American Tower Failures: Causes and Cures, David K. Davies, Consolidated Engineering Inc. • IARC Classifies Radiofi•equencv Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans, Interagency Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Press Release No. 208, May 31, 2011. FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: 1. Applicant. The Applicant is Brandon Olsen of New Singular Wireless PCS LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility. 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application at Auburn City Hall in the Council Chambers on April 16, 2014, at 5:30 pm. Substantive: 3. Site /Project Description. AT &T Mobility has applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming wireless communication facility (WCF) structure (99 -foot lattice tower) and 2,680sf equipment yard by increasing the tower height by 20 feet, installing twelve (12) new panel antennas, expanding the equipment yard by 560sf to accommodate a new 230sf equipment structure, and expanding the perimeter fencing of the equipment yard. The site is zoned R -5, Residential. Special Exception p. 3 Findings, Conclusion and Decision The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998. The original lattice tower was constructed as a radio tower. It was approved by Pierce County in a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. As constructed in 1965, the site had 2,680sf of equipment yard containing a 352sf equipment shed and the lattice tower. The tower is 98'11" tall. The total subject parcel size is 41,340sf (0.95 acres). The equipment yard composes about 6.5% of the total subject site. The existing tower is legally non - conforming. The class of tower most similar to the subject site is a Type 3 -13 monopole (ACC 18.04.912). This type of tower is allowed in the C -3, M -1, EP and M -2 zones, but not the R -5 zone (ACC 18.31.100.K). In 2009 Verizon Wireless applied for a Special Exception at the subject site to add an additional nine (9) panel antennas and an associated 128sf equipment shed within the existing footprint of the equipment yard. The Hearing Examiner approved the Special Exception request on September 21, 2009. In the 2009 Hearing Examiner's Findings of Fact No. 5, the Hearing Examiner found, "The expansion of the nonconforming use should not impair the quality of the neighborhood, because most of the additional ground equipment will be shielded from view b the trees in the area and the lattice tower will not be increased beyond its current 99 feet in height. Noise impacts will be within the City's noise standards. Consequently, the Hearing Examiner concludes that there will be no unmitigated adverse impacts as a result of the development." In his Conclusions of Law No. 3, the Examiner noted, "According to staff, the addition of nine (9) panel antennas will constitute approximately 1% of the total area of the existing tower, which is well below the 25% allowed by code." Though the 2009 Staff Report and Decision each describe the nine panel antennas as representing less than 1% of the overall tower area; no actual square footage for the tower was given in either the 2009 or the 2014 Staff Reports. Also, the 2009 Staff Report described the equipment yard as 3,300sf. The 2014 Staff Report was based on a GIS survey and found the equipment yard to be 2,680sf. The present decision will utilize the more recent area calculation which is subject to change should more accurate information be presented. Finally, in his Conclusions of Law No. 4, the Examiner stated, "The existing lattice tower is visible along portions of Hazel Avenue and Panorama Drive, which are local residential streets surrounding the site, but the project will not result in an increase to the tower's height. The subject property's equipment area is not visible from the public right of way as a result of the tree growth, and it is anticipated that the ground equipment associated with the project Special Exception p. 4 Findings, Conclusion and Decision will remain shielded from view as a result of the landscaping plan proposed for the site. Granting this special exception to allow the addition of nine (9) panel antennas will result in a minor expansion that will appreciably change the character of the existing wireless communication facility to allow for improved service coverage in the area but will not be out of character with the adjacent uses and structures as the new panel antennas, painted to match the tower, will not significantly alter the look of the existing tower." The property is zoned R -5, Residential. The purpose of the R -5 district is to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of four to five dwelling units per acre. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan similarly designates the subject site as Single Family Residential. Surrounding development includes single family residential development. The present application would raise the tower by approximately 20 feet to a height of 118'11". This is an increase in the tower's height by 20.2 %. The proposal also intends to expand the equipment yard by 560sf or 20.9% to accommodate a new equipment structure. The Applicant testified the increase in the tower height was necessary to both ensure adequate voice and data coverage and to meet minimum physical separation requirements between wireless carriers. The Applicant further testified, and the Staff concurred, that the Applicant and City had worked together to find opportunities for location of the antennas on other available structures such as utility poles, the City water tower and the elementary school. None of the other locations provided sufficient height to achieve the service coverage requirements. In order to site a new tower, the Applicant would need to locate the new tower in an appropriate zone and also meet the Separation between Facilities requirements of ACC 18.31.100(A)(1)(b). These conditions do not exist within the specific service coverage area. 4. Characteristics of the Area. The site is bordered to the north, south, east and west by single family residential use, all zoned in the Lakeland hills South — PUD zone. The site to the north is a City owned water tower. 5. Adverse Impacts. A SEPA Final Determination of Non - significance was issued on August 25, 2009 for the prior Special Exception request. The City issued an addendum to the previous Final Determination of Non - Significance on March 31, 2014. The Examiner concludes there are no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposal. As noted in the Oral Testimony and Exhibit 16, Mr. Huh expressed concerns related to the aesthetic, health and safety impacts of the proposed tower expansion. Specific factual issues are addressed as follows: A. Aesthetic Impacts. There are no significant adverse aesthetic impacts associated with the proposal. The project site already includes the existing 99 foot high lattice tower with multiple panel antennas and a radio tower plus a Special Exception p. 5 Findings, Conclusion and Decision fenced and landscaped equipment yard and support structures. The proposal will provide a marginal increase in the equipment yard area. Existing and new landscaping will shield the equipment area from view. Though the tower extension will be visible above the existing mature trees, the increased tower height and additional panel antennas will be painted to match the color of the existing tower. B. Health Impacts. Federal law prohibits the consideration of health impacts as outlined in Conclusion of Law No. 11. C. Safety. Mr. Huh presented a letter from Pierce County (Ex. 16) dated March 26, 2014 that stated, "It would appear that these [the radio tower and support structures] were built without obtaining the necessary permits." Mr. Huh also presented a document by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. titled North American Tower Failures: Causes and Cures. Mr. Huh expressed concern that the concrete base of the tower may not be able to support the increased wind load provided by an additional twelve panel antennas. He also expressed concern that in the event of a tower failure; the tower would land on an adjacent house. Mr. Huh presented evidence that the tower base is only 115 feet from the nearest sidewalk and 117 feet from the nearest house. The proposed final height of the tower is approximately 119 feet. It is possible in the event of a catastrophic failure of the tower, the top 2 -4 feet of the tower (the portion representing the radio tower) could impact the sidewalk or someone's home. However, the project will be required to provide evidence that the tower and base are structurally sound during the building permit phase. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Procedural: 1. Authority of the Hearing Examiner. ACC 18.70.020 grants the Hearing Examiner with the authority to review a request for a Special Exception and make a decision thereon. Substantive: 2. Zoning Designation. The property is zoned R -5, Residential. 3. Review Criteria and Application. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 3, the existing use and structure are legally non - conforming. ACC 18.70.020(A)(3) provides that the Hearing Examiner may grant a special exception to allow expansion of a non- conforming non - residential structure up to 25 %, provided that expansion meets the applicable standards of Title 18 and other requirements by the City. ACC Special Exception p. 6 Findings, Conclusion and Decision 18.70.020(B) defines the criteria for approval of a special exception. Several Federal Communications Commission statutes also apply. All applicable codes are quoted below and applied by the corresponding Conclusions of Law. ACC 18.70.020(A)(3): A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of'the ordinance codified in this title may he perunitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requireunents of the city. 4. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 3, the existing structure is nonresidential and became a legal nonconforming structure when it was annexed into the City of Auburn in 1998. As constructed in 1965, the site had 2,680sf of equipment yard containing a 352sf equipment shed and the lattice tower. The tower is 98'11" tall. The total subject parcel size is 41,340sf (0.95 acres). The equipment yard composes about 6.5% of the total subject site. In 2009 the Examiner granted a Special Exception at the subject site to add an additional nine (9) panel antennas and an associated 128sf equipment shed within the existing footprint of the equipment yard. The 2009 Staff Report and Decision each describe the nine panel antennas as representing less than 1% of the overall tower area. The 2009 Special Exception resulted in an increase in the number of site tenants (wireless carriers) without increasing either the structure (tower) or footprint of the use (equipment yard). The present application would raise the tower by approximately 20 feet to a height of 118'11". This is an increase in the tower's height by 20.2 %. The proposal also intends to expand the equipment yard by 560sf or 20.9% to accommodate a new equipment structure. If the tower represents the structure and the equipment yard and its associated equipment sheds represent the overall use, then neither the structure nor the use are being expanded beyond 25% of the pre- annexation level. ACC 18.70.020(B) Special Exceptions: In considering applications for special exceptions, the hearing examiner shall consider the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures, and no such special exception shall be authorized by the hearing examiner unless the hearing examiner finds that the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or iu furious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, and that the authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and punpose of this title. In authorizing a special exception, the hearing examiner may iunpose such requireunents and conditions with respect to location, installation, construction, maintenance and operation and extent of open spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this title as may be deemed necessauy for the protection of other properties in the zone or vicinity and the public interest. Special Exception p. 7 Findings, Conclusion and Decision 5. Properties along Panorama Drive in this area are characterized by suburban residential development with a mature tree canopy. The existing lattice tower is visible along portions of Hazel Avenue and Panorama Drive, the local residential streets surrounding the site. As noted in Findings of Fact No. 5, the proposal will provide a marginal increase in the equipment yard area but this increase will be screened with landscaping. Though the tower extension will be visible above the existing mature trees, the increased tower height and additional panel antennas will be painted to match the color of the existing tower. The expansion of the tower will allow for improved service coverage in the area while not appreciably changing the character of the existing wireless communication facility. As conditioned, there will be no adverse impacts from the project. ACC 18.31.100(B) Co- location Requirements. 1. For monopoles that are more than 75 feet in height and lattice towers of any height (Type 3 -B facilities), the owner of the property shall execute and provide evidence of a nonexclusive lease with the carrier that allows for other carriers to place antennas on the structure. 2. Anv application for a Type 3 -B facility shall include technical justification that an existing Type 3 -B facility with a nonexclusive lease could not be used instead of constructing a neu, tower. 6. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 3, the existing lattice tower is characterized as a Type 3 -B facility. Though there is nothing in the record to indicate there is a nonexclusive lease agreement with the carrier that allows other carriers to place antennas on the structure, the structure is already used nonexclusively by more than one carrier. There is no other Type 3 -B facility within the coverage area. This criterion is met. ACC 18.31.100(C) Height. 1. Unless otheri4lse provided for, the height of any primary support structure and /or antenna shall not exceed the height limitations of the zone. 2. The maximum height of any primary support structure shall not exceed 120 feet. 3. There shall be no variances allowed to the height limitations. 4. The carrier shall provide evidence that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved the location of a primary support structure relative to the Auburn Municipal Airport. Special Exception P. 8 Findings, Conclusion and Decision 7. The existing structure is non - conforming to the height restrictions in the R -5 Residential zone. The maximum height in this zone is 35 feet which is below the broadcast height needed to provide coverage for the service area. Granting the special exception would increase the non - conformity with respect to height within the zone. The Special Exception provisions of ACC 18.70.020(A)(3) conflict with ACC 18.31.100(0)(1) and ACC 18.31.100(C)(3). In most cases, the more specific provision, ACC 18.31.100(0)(1) would supersede the more general provisions of ACC 18.70.020(A)(3). In this specific instance, the provisions of the Special Exception code, though more general, are applicable because they are necessary to provide for cell tower coverage as required by the Federal Telecommunication Act of 1996, 47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(ii). 47 USC 332( c)(7)(B)(ii) provides that a local entity may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.. The Special Exception provisions are also construed as superseding ACC 18.31.100(0)(1) and ACC 18.31.100(0)(3) because a height modification is mandated by the federal "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012" as outlined in Conclusion of Law No. 12. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 3, prohibiting the requested increase in height would deny the Applicant the ability to provide cellular service in the vicinity of the proposal. The proposed increase in the tower height was necessary to both ensure adequate voice and data coverage and to meet minimum physical separation requirements between wireless carriers pursuant to FCC standards. The Applicant worked to find opportunities for location of the antennas on other available structures such as utility poles, the City water tower and the elementary school. None of the other locations provided sufficient height to achieve the service coverage requirements. In order to site a new tower, the Applicant would need to locate the new tower in an appropriate zone and also meet the Separation between Facilities requirements of ACC 18.31.100(A)(1)(b). These conditions do not exist within the specific service coverage area. Co- locating the new antenna on the existing tower is the only feasible option. In accordance with ACC 18.31.100(0)(2), the final tower height will be roughly 120 feet. The Applicant provided evidence that the FAA has approved the increase in height (Ex. 14). ACC 18.31.100(D) Setbacks. 1. All equiprruent shelters, cabinets, support structures or other above - ground facilities shall meet the setback requirements of the zone in which located except as follows. All equipment shelters, cabinets, or other above - ground facilities used to support primary support structures shall be set back the same distance required of the primary support structure. All equiprruent shelters, cabinets, or other above - ground facilities within a nonresidential zone shall be set back a minimum of 50 feet from anv adjacent R zone. 2. The minimum distance from anv primary support structure, of anv height, to anv residentially zoned parcel of property shall be a distance equal to the overall Special Exception P. 9 Findings, Conclusion and Decision height of the priinary support structure (including antennas) inultiplied by a factor 00 14,0. 8. The equipment yard will be marginally increased in size. This increase will be outside of the setbacks for the R -5 zone. The existing tower is non- conforming with respect to ACC 18.31.100(2). However, the footprint of the tower will not change with the proposal. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, the Applicant will be required to demonstrate the structural stability of the tower and base at the time of building permit. As conditioned, this criterion is met. ACC 18.31.100(E) Fencing and Landscaping. 1. Fencing. Fencing is required to enclose all above - ground support equipment that is associated with priinany support structures. Fencing will be 100 percent sight- obscuring, as defined in ACC 18.31.020(0)(2), if'visible from a public right - ofli4w or less intense zone. Equipinent shelters and /or cabinets shall be enclosed by fencing a minimum of six feet in height. Fencing shall meet the sight distance requirements of the city design and construction standards. 2. Landscaping. a. Where above - ground support equipment is visible from a public right - of =u,av, a minimum width of five feet of Tvpe II landscaping as defined in ACC 18.50.040 will be provided on the exterior of the enclosing fence in order to effectively screen the equipment from the public right- of =u,ay. Landscaping shall meet the sight distance requirements of the city design and construction standards. b. Where facilities are visible from adjacent residential uses, a minimum width of five feet of Tvpe I landscaping as defined in ACC 18.50.040 will be provided on the exterior of'the enclosing fence in order to effectively screen the equipment from the adjacent residential uses. c. Existing on -site vegetation may be used to meet the landscape requirements if approved by the planning director. 9. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 3, the existing wireless facility equipment yard is fenced and landscaped with mature landscaping. A condition of approval will require the fence surrounding the expansion of the equipment yard to comply with the city code. A landscaping plan will also be required. As conditioned, this criterion is met. ACC 18.31.100(F) Aesthetics. 1. In order to innnnize an'v potential, negative aesthetic iinpacts from neu, priinaiy support structures including protecting views to and from residential Special Exception P. 10 Findings, Conclusion and Decision neighborhoods, mitigation may be required to blend the facilities in with the adjacent development or environs. Typical solutions for the support structure might include: an extension of the building, a component of a sign structure, disguising the facility as a tree, planting of tall trees, moving the location of the facility, painting or texturing the facility, etc. 2. Building- or roof = mounted antennas will be painted or textured to blend with the adjacent sin faces. 3. No lettering, svinbols, images or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of'vehicular traffic on anv adjacent street shall be placed on or affixed to anv part of the WCF, unless required by the FC'C or FAA. 4. Except as specifically required by the FAA (but must be approved by the citv), freestanding primary support structures shall be painted a color that best allows them to blend into the surroundings. The use of grays, blues and greens might be appropriate; however, each application shall be evaluated individually. 10. The existing primary support structure is surrounded by mature trees and landscaping. A condition of approval will require the newly constructed portion to match the existing portion. The existing structure is painted gray to blend into the predominate color of the sky in Western Washington. The equipment area will not be visible from any street. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, no adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. 11. Consideration of Health Impacts Prohibited by Federal Law. Federal law expressly precludes local jurisdictions from regulating wireless communication facilities on the basis of health impacts. The Supremacy Clause of the federal constitution (Art. VI) provides that federal law supersedes state law. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, a member of the public expressed concerns regarding the health impacts of the electromagnetic radiation produced by the proposed antenna. There is a provision in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that applies to local regulation of radiation levels, specifically 47 USC 332(c)(7), which provides as follows: (7) Preservation of local zoning authority. (A) General authority. Except as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this Act shall limit or affect the authority of a State or local government or instrumentality thereof over decisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless se7 -i4ce facilities. (B) Limitations. Special Exception P. 11 Findings, Conclusion and Decision (iv) No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placeunent, construction, and modification of personal wireless ser0ces facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of'radio fi•equencv emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Comnnrnications] Commissions regulations concerning such emissions. The provision above precludes the consideration of health /environmental impacts of "personal wireless services facilities ". 47 USC 332(c)(7)(C)(i) defines "personal wireless services" as "commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services." Therefore, the Examiner is prohibited from considering the health /environmental impacts of the electromagnetic radiation generated by the new antennas. Health impacts were not considered and did not influence the Examiner's decision. 12. Facility Modifications. Federal law also prohibits local jurisdictions from prohibiting modifications to existing cell towers, such as modest increases in height, under certain prescribed circumstances. Section 6409 of the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012" provides as follows: SEC. 6409. Wireless Facilities Deployment. (a) Facilitv Modifications. (1) In General. Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104 -104) or anv other provision of lain, a State or local govermnent may not deny, and shall approve, anv eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the phvsical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) Eligible Facilities Request. For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of all existing wireless tower or base station that involves a. Colocation of'new transmission equipment; b. Removal of transmission equipment; or c. Replacement of transmission equipment. Section (a)(1) above requires the Examiner to approve any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower as long as the request does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the tower or base station. The present Application represents an eligible facilities request under Section (a)(2)(a) above Special Exception p. 12 Findings, Conclusion and Decision because it is a request for colocation on an existing tower. The question remaining is what constitutes a substantial change to the physical dimensions of the tower. On January 25, 2013, the FCC issued a public notice entitled "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Offers Guidance on Interpretation of Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012." The public notice states the FCC has applied a consistent definition for a `substantial change' in the dimensions of a tower or base station. The FCC notes that this interpretation has not been challenged in the courts. The FCC invoked its rulemaking authority under the Tax Act which expressly grants the FCC the authority to "implement and enforce" the provisions of Title IV of that Act "as if this title is a part of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 USC 151)." A substantial increase in the size of a tower occurs if: 1. the mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower would increase the existing height of the tower by more than 10 %, or by the height of one additional antenna arrav with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or 2. the mounting of the proposed antenna would involve the installation of more than the standard number of neu, equipment cabinets for the technologv involved, not to exceed four, or more than one neu, equipment shelter; or 3. the mounting of the proposed antenna would involve adding an appurtenance to the bodv of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable; or 4. the mounting of the proposed antenna would involve excavation outside the current tower site, defined as the current boundaries of the lease or owned property surrounding the tower and anv access or utility easements currently related to the site. The existing wireless communication facility began as an FM radio tower. In 2009, Verizon wireless placed an antenna array on the tower. The present application proposes to co- locate one additional array from a separate carrier on the tower. The present proposal is, arguably, the only "additional antenna array" that may be considered less than a "substantial change" in the physical dimensions of the tower. As noted in the Findings of Fact, the Applicant requests an increase in the tower height by 20 feet or 20.2 %. This increase is necessary to maintain the required vertical separation from another existing wireless carrier. Though the equipment could be located below the existing carrier, the resulting height would be inadequate Special Exception p. 13 Findings, Conclusion and Decision to provide coverage for the service area. The vertical separation between carriers will be nine (9) feet, less than the 20 feet maximum. The proposal will include the installation of one new equipment shelter. The new antennas would protrude from the tower less than 24 feet and less than those of the existing carrier. No excavation outside the current tower site is needed. The current proposal meets all of the above criteria. DECISION The Special Exception to expand the existing nonconforming structure as proposed in Application No. VAR 14-0003 is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans for the proposed WCF tower extension and equipment installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee to ensure consistency with the application materials and decision on the Special Exception approved by the Hearing Examiner. 2. In order to meet code requirements of ACC 18.31.020.F, that limit the use of barbed wire to the City's P -1, M -1 or M -2 zones and provides that no fence in other zoning districts may include the use of barbed wire, the extension of the fence as part of this proposal shall not include the installation of barbed wire or razor wire for the portion of the fence that an expansion of the yard enclosure. Barbed wire can remain on the existing portion of fence. 3. A structural evaluation is required for City review prior to authorization of the building permit. A licensed engineer shall perform an analysis to determine the structural integrity of the proposed tower extension, the number of new and existing antennas on the existing tower and all other additions. The analysis shall determine that the tower and its foundation shall be sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new, existing antennas plus the increase in tower height. This also applies to any other equipment attached to the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved with the building permit. 4. Compatible color is required of the tower and tower mounted equipment. To reduce or avoid aesthetic impacts and comply with ACC 18.31.100.F, "Aesthetics ", at the time of building permit application, the Applicant shall provide color or material samples or other methods (such as photographic simulations, etc.) to ensure that not only the tower extension, but that all other equipment attached to the tower is manufactured in a color or coated in a color, (such as paint) as similar as possible, to the existing galvanized metal (gray) color of the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee. 5. A supplemental landscape plan is required. The proposed fence extension for expansion of the ground level equipment area will eliminate a portion of the existing site landscape buffer. Since the existing vegetation in this area consists of Special Exception p. 14 Findings, Conclusion and Decision a mixture of Himalayan blackberry vines and shrubs in the area, there is likely a need to supplement the vegetation in this area with additional native plantings to ensure continued visual screening given the buffer reduction. At the time of building permit application, the Applicant shall provide a landscape plan for supplemental native plantings to be located south of the new equipment area to ensure continued visual screening of ground level equipment. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee. Dated this 29th day of April, 2014. Emily Terrell City of Auburn Hearing Examiner Pro Tem Appeal Right and Valuation Notices This decision is final subject to appeal to superior court as governed by Chapter 36.70C RCW. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Special Exception p. 15 Findings, Conclusion and Decision ACITYOF DBuRN WASHINGTON SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility File # VAR14 -0003 I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Application Date: January 30, 2014 Applicant: Brandon Olsen, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility 19801 SW 72nd Ave STE 200 Tualatin, OR 97026 Agent: George Pierce, Ryka Consulting 918 S Horton St STE 1002 Seattle, WA 98134 Property Owner: Margaret Robinson, Senior Counsel American Tower Management, LLC 10 Presidential Way Woburn, MA 01801 Project Description: Special Exception pursuant to City Code Section 18.70.020.A.3 to increase the height of the existing approx. 99 foot high Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) tower by 20 feet (20.2 %), add new antennas, construct a 230 square foot associated equipment shelter surrounded by an extension of the existing fence on a site zoned R5, Residential. Proposed Location: 5811 Panorama Drive SE, Auburn WA 98001 The site is within the NE quarter, of the NW quarter of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Pierce County, Washington. Parcel Number: Pierce Co. Assessor's Parcel #0520062013. AUBUR I"vIORE THAN YOU WAGINED Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non-Conforming Date: April 3, 2014 Use, AT&T — File No. VAR14-0002 ` \\�\\� *— � 1v , � �� .��>, � , .� i��::..., , ..D�:,:.. ,LH��.�. .i..��,.n:�i.- L�.a r ,.,..�..�r.� �. � iPo�ew�.L?.�pc�auon.irtu �DL'C'IbnsuounL'(MnCmrn +PIPUb4cl;'seD�sm<i Res�hssiiLCOnunrnc�� \tiaiaFcanues +FPEvvvowraalPorYD�sma +PI,D%�Of;ortfki�clupnrcui+IL\iHCResiEm�ulRl�mCacnvc6�toWeHomel;wn C7I.igWC�waculUitr�a IW�awiwalUseP.mn AlRnidmnllDl'.�lne +RURn�datulOdurDamcl iC`(arcal Hus�vess Pmxt LyxlmE HJk South WD 2i Re.uAmnal>DL'.ine +RUH ResWemiL Od¢e D�smtt(Hosymp +C3 Hea��Commercul Duma LF Avport Lav6wp Fe1G aso-in T R]ResiEmul]DL'Aae +7"l'Trrtace�'in�' +C4AL.eNUuCo�rcraal MIL�pnlvEnmulDi+nin +RIUR�siEm�ullo�l.'.{7e ln.'CVncLns�fieEl:xUsmn .,�� Page 2 of 16 Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 II. SEPA STATUS: The project is not SEPA exempt. An addendum to the previous Final Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) File # SEP09 -0020 was issued on March 31, 2014. III. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Comprehensive Plan designations, zoning designations and existing land uses of the subject site and surrounding properties are: 2. On January 30, 2014, George Pierce of Ryka Consulting on behalf of Branson Olsen of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility, Applicant, and on behalf of Margaret Robinson, Senior Counsel of American Tower Management, LLC, Property owner, applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming use. More specifically, the proposal seeks to increase the height of the existing approx. 99 -foot high wireless communication facility (WCF) tower by 20 feet (20.2 %), add twelve new antennas, four per sector on boom gates, construct an approximately 230 square foot associated equipment shelter surrounded by an extension of the existing fence on a site zoned R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units Per Acre). 3. A Special Exception is required for the proposal since the zoning designation of the subject property is R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units per Acre) and the existing wireless communication facility (WCF) is nonconforming to the use regulations of this zone. It is non - conforming because wireless communication facilities are not allowed in this Residential zoning district with the exception of Type 1 -D wireless communication facilities per ACC 18.31.100.K (Type 1 -D, WCF are antenna located on existing water towers, athletic field light poles, or similar public utility infrastructure not located within , ' Comprehensive Plan Zoning classification Current Land Use designation Single Family Residential R5, Residential, Five Wireless Communication Project Dwelling Units per Acre Facility (WCF) Site Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development North (PUD) Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development South (PUD) Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences and Public & Quasi - Public Unit Development and municipal water West (PUD) storage facility Single Family Residential Lakeland Hills Planned Single- family residences Unit Development East (PUD) 2. On January 30, 2014, George Pierce of Ryka Consulting on behalf of Branson Olsen of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d.b.a. AT &T Mobility, Applicant, and on behalf of Margaret Robinson, Senior Counsel of American Tower Management, LLC, Property owner, applied for a Special Exception to expand an existing non - conforming use. More specifically, the proposal seeks to increase the height of the existing approx. 99 -foot high wireless communication facility (WCF) tower by 20 feet (20.2 %), add twelve new antennas, four per sector on boom gates, construct an approximately 230 square foot associated equipment shelter surrounded by an extension of the existing fence on a site zoned R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units Per Acre). 3. A Special Exception is required for the proposal since the zoning designation of the subject property is R5, Residential (Five Dwelling Units per Acre) and the existing wireless communication facility (WCF) is nonconforming to the use regulations of this zone. It is non - conforming because wireless communication facilities are not allowed in this Residential zoning district with the exception of Type 1 -D wireless communication facilities per ACC 18.31.100.K (Type 1 -D, WCF are antenna located on existing water towers, athletic field light poles, or similar public utility infrastructure not located within , ' Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 public street right -of -way). The current use is as privately -owned site and tower for wireless communication facilities. 4. Per Auburn City Code (ACC) 18.04.912, the city defines the following types of WCF: "18.04.912 Wireless communications TYPE 1. Type 1 are new antennas erected on existing buildings or nonresidential structures. There are four separate Type 1 categories described as follows: 1 -A. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building cannot be 25 percent greater than the existing building or exceed the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. 1 -B. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building cannot be 50 percent greater than the existing building or exceed the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. 1 -C. The combined height of the antenna together with the height of the existing building is 50 percent greater than the existing building or exceeds the height limitation of the zone in which the building is located. The height limitation of the zone can only be exceeded by 25 percent. 1 -D. Antenna located on existing water towers, athletic field light poles, or similar public utility infrastructure not located within public street right -of -way. The height limitation of the WCF will be 10 percent of the existing structure height, but may be increased to a maximum of 20 percent with an administrative use permit and may be increased to a maximum of 30 percent with a conditional use permit. The height limitation of the zone may be exceeded relative to the above provisions allowed for a 1 -D facility. TYPE 2. Type 2 are new antennas erected on existing (primary) support structures that have previous city approvals. There are two separate Type 2 categories described as follows: 2 -A. Must meet height requirements of previous approval and is limited to 50 percent total (cumulative) expansion of equipment area. 2 -B. Has greater height requirements than previous approval and allows for more than a 50 percent expansion of the equipment area. TYPE 3. Type 3 is the erection of new (primary) support structures. There are two separate Type 3 categories described as follows: 3 -A. Monopoles that are 75 feet or less in height. 3 -B. Monopoles that are more than 75 feet in height or lattice towers of any height. " 5. Per Auburn City Code (ACC) 18.31.100.K the City defines the following types of WCF and the zoning district in which they are allowed: Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 "K. Zones in Which WCF Are Permitted. The following table illustrates which zones the types of facilities as defined by ACC 18.04.912(J) are allowed in and which permits are required. Microcells, as defined by ACC 18.04.912(G), are allowed only in residential zones and shall be permitted outright pursuant to the provisions of ACC 18.04.912(G). 1. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 20 percent of the supporting structure. 2. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 30 percent of the supporting structure. 3. The maximum height allowed, including antennas, is 45 feet." 6. A non - conforming structure or use may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section and 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the Type of Permit Required Zone Permitted Administrative Conditional Outright Use Permit Use Permit All Zones 1 -D 1 -D' 1 -D2 RO -H 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C C -N 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C C -1 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C C -2, 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C DUC C -3 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -B, 3 -A 3 -B M -1, 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -13, 3 -A 3 -B EP M -2 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -B, 3 -A 3 -B P -1 1 -13, 2 -A 1 -C, 2 -B 3 -A3 I 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C LF 1 -A 1 -B 1 -C 1. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 20 percent of the supporting structure. 2. Allowance for the WCF to extend to a height of 30 percent of the supporting structure. 3. The maximum height allowed, including antennas, is 45 feet." 6. A non - conforming structure or use may be expanded if a Special Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section and 18.70.020.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states: "18.70.020 Special exceptions. A. Only the following special exceptions may be granted by the hearing examiner after a public hearing is held pursuant to ACC 18.70.040: 3. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted, by means of a special exception, to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 adoption of this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage." A similar code provision is found within the zoning code chapter related to regulation of nonconforming uses and structures at Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.54.060.H: "18.54.060 Maintenance, damage repairs and restorations, additions, enlargements, moving or relocation of nonconforming structures, and residential structures. H. A nonresidential structure or use which becomes a legal nonconforming structure or use after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title may be permitted by means of a special exception issued by the hearing examiner pursuant to ACC 18.70.020 to expand the existing use or structure up to 25 percent of the use or structure existing at the time of the adoption of the ordinance codified in this title; provided further, that the addition otherwise meets the standards of this title and other requirements of the city. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage." 7. This request for the Special Exception has been reviewed with the Planning Director and the Assistant City Attorney. The Planning Director in reviewing the zoning code determined that the special exception process in ACC 18.70.020A (3) is the appropriate process for this proposal. ACC 18.56.060H (Nonconforming Structures and Uses) allows expansion up to 25% under the Special Use Exception. ACC 18.70.020A(3), provides that non - residential use which becomes non - conforming "after the effective date of this ordinance" may be permitted to expand up to 25% of the use or structure existing at this time. The Director determined a variance is not appropriate because the city's zoning code provides a more specific process for expansion of nonconforming structures and uses. 8. The 0.95 -acre site is located on the north side of the public street of Panorama Drive SE, between Francis Court SE and Hazel Court SE. The character of the vicinity is predominantly a residential neighborhood. 9. The 0.95 -acre (41,340 square foot) site is located near a high point in elevation for the vicinity. The site occurs at an elevation of 574 above sea level and the single family residential properties developed to the east are approximately 25 feet lower in ground surface elevation. The municipal water supply facility located to the northwest is at a Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 similar and slightly higher elevation of 576 feet. The wireless communication facilities are located in the central portion of the site surrounded by mature, native vegetation that has historically been retained. The native vegetation consists of mature Douglas fir trees, Black Cottonwood trees, and understory vegetation. 10. The existing WCF consist of an approximately 99 -foot high lattice -type tower with an approximately 2,680 square foot equipment area defined by a 6 -foot high galvanized chain link fence with razor wire at the top. Located within the fenced yard and north of the tower are two, single -story equipment buildings, one with an attached minor storage shed. The yard also contains a separate pad containing an emergency power generator. Vehicle access to the WCF is provided by a gravel driveway to the Panorama Drive SE, secured by a locked metal gate. 11. The property has been the subject of a previous request for a special exception to expand a non - conforming use as follows: On June 23, 2009 the City received an application (City File # MIS09 -0008) for a Special Exception from Sarah Telschow of RealCom Associates LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless, a new carrier at this location, for the site preparation and installation of nine (9) panel antennas to an existing non - conforming tower on a site zoned R5, Residential in order to accommodate a new wireless communication provider. Additional improvements proposed as part of this proposal included an equipment shelter and backup emergency power generator within an existing lease area. On September 9, 2009, a public hearing was held by the City's Hearing Examiner on the Special Exception Application to expand an existing non - conforming use under the process identified in ACC 18.70.020, "Special Exceptions ". No one other than staff and the Applicant testified. On September 21, 2009, the Hearing Examiner issued a written decision approving the request (City File # MIS09 -0008) without conditions. There were no requests for reconsideration or appeals of this decision. Building (alteration) permits were subsequently issued (File # ALT09 -0305) on January 29, 2010 and the project constructed. 12. The Application materials from this prior application indicate as well as the "Findings of Fact" from the previous hearing examiner decision (File # MIS09 -0008) indicate: "The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998, and the original lattice tower was approved by Pierce County in a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. " 13. As indicated by the Applicant's representative in their January 22, 2014 letter from Gisele Lima, Radio Frequency Engineer, AT &T Mobility, the project is needed to provide coverage in the City of Auburn and specifically the Lakeland Hills neighborhood. The letter indicates based on radio frequency planning tools and other data collected by the Applicant, the vicinity has been identified as requiring an upgrade to achieve 4G LTE (data) service. The letter provides the following justification for the request: Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 "The existing tower is 98' -11" tall, with an attached FM antenna. The antennae of another wireless carrier, Verizon, are already attached to the structure at a centerline of 87' -9 ". Due to required separation of 9' between two wireless carriers to prevent radio frequency interference, the minimum available centerline elevation the Applicant's antennae are 70' -11 ". But due to area topography, existing mature tree heights in the area, and the Applicant's coverage needs, the Applicant proposes to extend the existing structure by 20' and co- locate their antennas at a 105' centerline. According to the enclosed coverage propagation maps, this height is the minimum required to obtain the Applicant's coverage objective. As depicted on the enclosed propagation maps, a 70' -11" antenna centerline would not sufficiently resolve the coverage gap, but a 105' antenna centerline would sufficiently resolve the coverage gap and meet coverage objectives." 14. As indicated by the Applicant's representative in the January 22, 2014 letter from Gisele Lima, Radio Frequency Engineer, AT &T Mobility, the Applicant considered three other alternative locations to this proposal. These locations were evaluated and eliminated as not feasible mostly due to insufficient height to meet coverage objectives as listed in the letter. 15. The property has had the Comprehensive Plan Designation of "Single Family Residential' and the zoning of the property was originally `R1, Residential (8,000 square foot minimum lot size)' at the time of the property annexation to the City. The R1 zoning category was subsequently changed to R5, Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) by Ordinance # 6245 in June of 2009. 16. The property is zoned R5, Residential (Five dwelling units per acre). The stated purpose of the R5 district as stated at ACC 18.07.010 is to: "18.07.010 Intent (of the R5 zoning district). The R -5 single - family residential zones are intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of four to five dwelling units per net acre. This zone will provide for the development of single - family detached dwellings and for such accessory uses as are related, incidental and not detrimental to the single - family residential environment. 17. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan designates this site as "Single Family Residential" The City's Comprehensive Plan describes the purpose of this designation as follows: "Single Family Purpose: To designate and protect areas for predominantly single family dwellings. Description: This category includes those areas reserved primarily for single family dwellings. Implementing regulations should provide for an appropriate range of lot sizes, clustered and mixed housing types as part of a planned development. Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 Compatible Uses: Single family residences and uses that serve or support residential development, such as schools, daycare centers, churches and parks shall be considered appropriate and may be permitted on a conditional basis. Other public buildings and semi - public uses may be permitted if designed and laid out in a manner which enhances rather than detracts from the residential character of the area. In siting such uses, however, special care shall be given to ensuring adequate parking, landscaping, and traffic circulation with a minimum of conflict with residential uses. Uses which generate significant traffic (such as large churches) should only locate on developed arterials in areas zoned for institutional uses. Intrusion of industrial uses into any of these single family areas shall be prohibited. Only very limited commercial uses such as home occupations or strictly limited appropriate conditional uses can be allowed. Planned developments should be favorably considered in these designations in order to allow optimal flexibility. In providing such flexibility, the emphasis should be on small alley - loaded lot single family development, limited low density multifamily housing and a mixture of types, and design diversity should be sought. Except where conditional use permits have been previously granted, alternate structure types should not exceed more than 40 percent of the units, and alternative structures should in most cases contain no more than four dwelling units each. However, where substantial offsetting community benefits can be identified, such alternative structures may be allowed to contain more than three units each. Criteria for Designation: Areas suitable for this designation include those areas designated in goals and policies of this Plan as single family areas. Consistent with those policies, areas within the Community Serving Area of the City suitable for this category should be reserved for these uses. This designation should also be applied to areas adjacent to lower density residential plan designations. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the City to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code, decisions on development regulations, and to guide site - specific land use decisions -- all of which must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 18. The proposed development is not exempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) categorical exemption thresholds. After review of the proposal, an addendum to a previous Final Determination of Non - Significance (SEP09- 0020) was issued March 31, 2014. 19. Staff conducted a site visit on April 3, 2014 to verify the proposal and surroundings. Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 20. A Notice of Application and notice of the hearing was posting on the site, mailed to properties within 300 feet and published in the newspaper on or before March 31, 2014 in accordance with ACC 14.07.040 "Methods of providing notice ". 21. The application was received on January 30, 2014. The Application was determined complete on March 13, 2014. A decision on the proposal is expected to be issued within the 120 -day timeframe of ACC 14.11.010, `Time limits'. CONCLUSIONS: ACC Section 18.70.020.13 provides criteria for Special Exceptions: A. Consideration shall be given to the nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures prior to authorizing; Staff Analysis: The subject property is surrounded by single family residences except to the northwest which contains a municipal water storage facility (vertical water tank) constructed in 2011. The public right -of -way of Panorama Drive SE borders the site to the south. All of the surrounding properties are zoned Lakeland Hills Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site is an island of the R5, Residential zoning designation different from its surroundings resulting from the ownership pattern existing at the time of annexation to the City. The proposed tower extension and equipment shelter construction is proposed to provide high quality 4G LTE service to homes and automobiles in the Lakeland Hills neighborhood and vicinity to meet the voice and data needs of AT &T customers. The proposed tower addition would be most visible from the adjacent residences and streets, including Panorama Drive SE (See photo simulations provided with the application). However, the existing on -site 77' to 87' tall trees assist in partially obscuring views of the tower. The ground level equipment shelter and generator are more effectively screened by the existing vegetation. Granting this special exception to allow the tower addition, antennae and equipment installation is not anticipated to change the existing character of the facility and will not materially change the developed nature from the current conditions. As described by the Applicant, the proposal will not create any significant impact to the surrounding area and is consistent with the developed character of the current use. B. That the authorizing of such special exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; Staff Analysis: The proposed expansion will be subject to all applicable City codes, building codes and regulations. The proposed tower addition represents less than a 20.2% percent increase in height to the tower (Change from 98' -11" to 118' -11" feet). The existing WCF consist of a tower and equipment areas within an approximately 2,680 square foot equipment area defined by a 6- �I Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 foot high chain link fence. The proposed expansion of the equipment area measures approximately 16 feet by 35 feet or a fenced 560- square -foot expansion area. This represents an approximately 20.9 percent increase of the equipment yard area. The current request for a special exception does not exceed 25 percent, the maximum expansion allowed by the special exception process (ACC 18.70.020.A) The Application for expansion was reviewed by various City Divisions and the Valley Regional Fire Authority (VRFA). The Building Division noted that a structural evaluation will be necessary associated with the building permit to demonstrate that the tower and its foundation is sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new, existing antennas plus the increase in tower height. This would also apply to any other equipment attached to the tower. The Engineering Division noted that the project will require a storm permit that is anticipated to be a Level 1 Storm Permit. A grading permit may also be required if the construction should exceed more than 500 cubic yards of earthwork. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Utilities Division, however the proposed WCF addition will not require use of, or increase demand for public utilities. The proposed tower addition would be most visible from the adjacent residences and from Panorama Drive SE (See photo simulations provided with the application). However, the existing on -site 77' to 87' tall trees assist in partially obscuring views of the tower. The ground level equipment shelter and generator are more effectively screened by the existing vegetation. The "Applicant's Responses to ACC 18.31.100" document, accompanying their application, indicates City code required landscape visual screening of the WCF is proposed with the following method: "Existing vegetation on the site fully screens the existing above ground support equipment from view. As proposed, existing vegetation will also fully screen the proposed above ground support equipment from view. The Application requests approval to use existing on -site vegetation to meet the landscaping requirements set forth in city code. Photographic evidence is provided within the application package." Using existing vegetation to provide the required visual landscape screening is allowed by city code. However, the proposed fence extension for expansion of the ground level equipment area will require elimination of a portion of the existing landscape buffer. The resultant distance from the fence to the south property line will be approximately forty feet and twenty feet of this is the gravel driveway which does not contribute to visual screening. Since the existing vegetation in this area consists of a mixture of Himalayan blackberry vines and shrubs in the area, there is likely a need to supplement the vegetation in this area with additional native plantings to ensure continued visual screening. A condition of approval is proposed to provide a landscape plan for supplemental native plantings on the south side to ensure continued visual screening of ground level equipment with the proposed reduction in landscape buffer. The "Applicant's Responses to ACC 18.31.100" document, accompanying their application materials, comments on City code required painting of WCF support structures to allow them to blend into the surroundings through the use of grays and blues is proposed. The code provides that each application is required to be evaluated individually. The Applicant indicates the tower extension would match the existing tower design and colors. However, �I Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 this only addresses the tower component and not the other equipment attached to the tower. To reduce or avoid visual impacts to the extent possible, a condition of approval is proposed to provide a color or material samples to ensure that not only the tower extension, but the equipment attached to the tower is manufactured in a color or coated in a color, such as paint, to be as similar as possible to the existing galvanized metal color of the tower (gray). The proposal is not anticipated to be injurious to public health. As indicated in the "Letter from Engineering Manager dated December 20, 2013, accompanying the application, the proposed operation of the WCF will transmit at frequencies in the range of 734 to 892 MHz and 1,930 to 2,145 MHz as licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). As indicated, the power densities calculated for each sector of the proposed facility will be well below the maximum Federal Communications Commission exposure levels and is proven safe according to federal guidelines. The proposal will not cause any habitable areas of the structure to exceed the Federal Communications Commission's worst case limits for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic radiation fields. Also, as indicated the proposed facility is not anticipated to interfere with other communication facilities. The site is monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week by a national operations center to insure normal operations. With the conditions proposed, the special exception, if granted will not significantly alter the character of the neighborhood or be detrimental to surrounding properties in which the property is located. C. The authorization of such special exception will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of the zoning code. Staff Analysis: The stated purpose of the zoning code is to: "18.02.030 Purpose. A. The purpose of this title is to implement the city's comprehensive plan. This title will be used to further the growth and development of the city consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and it's implementing elements. This title will also further the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the city's population and to prevent and abate public nuisances. B. The specific zones and regulations set out in this title are designed to: 1. Provide adequate public facilities and services, including utilities, roads, schools, and parks in conjunction with development; 2. Provide housing with essential light, air, privacy, and open space; 3. Facilitate the safe and efficient movement of traffic on the city's streets; 4. Stabilize and enhance property values; 5. Facilitate adequate provisions for doing public and private business and thereby safeguard the community's economic structure upon which the prosperity and welfare of all depends; and 6. Through such achievements, help ensure the safety and security of home life, foster good citizenship, and create and preserve a more healthful, serviceable and attractive municipality and environment in which to live." Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 The Special Exception, if approved would be consistent with the growth and development purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and assist in promoting private enterprise for community economic vitality. Specifically, the intent of the Special Exception provision in the zoning code is to allow the Hearing Examiner to approve limited expansions of existing non - conforming uses and development. The Applicant is proposing to increase tower height and yard area to increase the efficiency and capacity of their communication services. The proposed addition is less than the maximum increase of 25 percent that could be authorized. Staff believes it is reasonable to allow the expansion of the non - conforming structure to accommodate an incremental upgrade to the facility. D. This section does not allow the expansion of a use or structure which would be inconsistent with a previously authorized administrative use permit, conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement between the city and the property owner. This section also does not allow the expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage. Staff Analysis: The subject site was developed prior to its annexation into the City in 1998, and the original lattice tower is believed to be approved by Pierce County by a 1965 building permit. Pierce County records do not have detailed information regarding the tower's approval. Since no previous administrative use or conditional use permit is known to exist, the expansion if approved is not known to violate any previously authorized conditional use permit, special property use permit, contract rezone, or binding agreement. Also, the proposal so does not propose any expansion of any nonconforming hazardous material storage, which is prohibited. Staff finds the request meets the criterion, as conditioned. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the application materials presented and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the staff report, Staff recommends that the Special Exception, File # VAR14 -0003 be approved with the following five conditions: VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans for the proposed WCF tower extension and equipment installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee to ensure consistency with the application materials and decision on the Special Exception approved by the Hearing Examiner. �I Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 2. In order to meet code requirements of ACC 18.31.020.F, that limit the use of barbed wire to the city's P -1, M -1 or M -2 zones and provides that no fence in other zoning districts may include the use of barbed wire, the extension of the fence as part of this proposal shall not include the installation of barbed wire or razor wire for the portion of the fence that an expansion of the yard enclosure. Barbed wire can remain on the existing portion of fence. 3. A structural evaluation is required for City review prior to authorization of the building permit. A licensed design professional shall perform an analysis to determine the structural integrity of the proposed tower extension, the number of new and existing antennas on the existing tower and all other additions. The analysis shall determine that the tower and its foundation shall be sufficient to support all imposed loads of the new, existing antennas plus the increase in tower height. This also applies to any other equipment attached to the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved with the building permit. 4. Compatible color is required of the tower and tower mounted equipment. To reduce or avoid aesthetic impacts and comply with ACC 18.31.100. F, `Aesthetics', at the time of building permit application, the Applicant shall provide color or material samples or other methods (such as photographic simulations, etc.) to ensure that not only the tower extension, but that other equipment attached to the tower is manufactured in a color or coated in a color, (such as paint) as similar as possible, to the existing galvanized metal (gray) color of the tower. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee. 5. A supplemental landscape plan is required. The proposed fence extension for expansion of the ground level equipment area will eliminate a portion of the existing site landscape buffer. Since the existing vegetation in this area consists of a mixture of Himalayan blackberry vines and shrubs in the area, there is likely a need to supplement the vegetation in this area with additional native plantings to ensure continued visual screening given the buffer reduction. At the time of building permit application, the Applicant shall provide a landscape plan for supplemental native plantings to be located south of the new equipment area to ensure continued visual screening of ground level equipment. The submittal shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director or designee. VII. EXHIBIT LIST: Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Special Exception Application Materials: 2A Completed Application Form 2B Letter of Authorization 2C Request for Special Exception Narrative, Received January 30, 2014. 2D SD242 Lakeland Hills Way & Elizabeth Ave SE Project Plans, Sheets T -1, C -1, & A -1 thorough A -2, B.J. Thomas P.E., December 13, 2013. 2E Applicant's Responses to ACC 18.31.100, Received January 30, 2014. 2F Letter to City re: Rational and alternatives, Gisele Lima, Radio ; TT�i, Glffrg? Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 Frequency Engineer, AT &T Mobility, January 22, 2014 2G Letter to City re: Radio Frequency and Density, Ken Seymour, Engineering Manger at Mobility, December 20, 2013. 2H Federal Communications Commission Antenna Structure Registration TOWAIR Determination Results, January 27, 2014 21 SD2442- Lakeland Hills Way & Elizabeth Ave SE RF Service Map, AT &T, December 23, 2013. 2J SD2442- Lakeland Hills Way & Elizabeth Ave SE RF Service Gap Exhibits, AT &T, Received January 30, 2014. 2K Aerial Photo (1) and Ground Level Photos of Equipment Yard (3), Received January 30, 2014. 2L Photo - simulations of tower height increase (aerial and four "Before and After ") AT &T, Received January 30, 2014. Exhibit 3 2012 Aerial photo of the site and vicinity Exhibit 4 City Zoning Map Exhibit 5 City Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 6 Addendum to previous Determination of Non - Significance (SEP09 -0020) Exhibit 7 Notice of Application /Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 8 Affidavit of Publication Exhibit 9 Affidavit of Mailing Exhibit 10 Affidavit of Posting Exhibit 11 Hearing Examiner decision on the previous Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon Exhibit 12 Staff report on the previous Special Exception, File #MIS09 -0008, Verizon Exhibit 13 Copy of screen shot of Pierce County historical permit records Staff reserves the right to supplement the record of the case to respond to matters and information raised subsequent to the writing of this report. �I Agenda Subject: Special Exception for Expansion of a Non - Conforming ate: April 3, 2014 Use. AT &T — File No. VAR 14-0002 �I Exhibit 2C Request for Special Exception New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (Applicant) requests approval through a Special Exception to increase the existing wireless structure located on Panorama Dr. SE (47.256200, - 122.219941 / Parcel #: 0520062013) by 20.2% of the existing structure (20' tower extension), collocate its antennae on the extended, existing structure, and construct an 11' 5" x 20' equipment shelter to house associated radio equipment at the base of the existing structure (see enclosed site plans). The proposed equipment shelter would be surrounded by an extension of the existing chain link fencing on site. Utilities will be provided from existing facilities located on Panorama Dr. SE. Written Statement Under ACC 18.70.020.B, in reviewing applications for° special exceptions, the Hearing Examiner shall consider: 1. The nature and condition of all adjacent uses and structures; and Applicant Response: All structures adjacent to the subject property are single - family residences, except the parcel to the northwest, which contains a new city -owned water tank. The single - family residences and water tank are all in good condition. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, obtained through due diligence and good faith effort, the proposed extension and equipment shelter would not be inconsistent with previously authorized permits for the existing structure, in accord with ACC 18.70.020. The subject property was previously part of Pierce County before annexation into the City of Auburn. Though the Applicant contacted Pierce County and the City of Auburn, the Applicant was unable to locate a copy of any previously authorized permits for the existing structure. The proposed extension and equipment shelter construction will ensure ubiquitous, high - quality 4G LTE service in automobiles and homes in the Lakeland Hills Way and Elizabeth Avenue SE vicinity. 4G LTE technology is essential to meeting the voice and data needs of AT &T customers in this area, particularly as many AT &T customers now use their mobile device as their primary phone. While voice service may be acceptable in some areas, AT &T needs to provide the 4G LTE technology upgrade so no neighborhood is denied high quality voice and data service. AT &T requires 9' of separation distance between the Verizon antennae currently located on the existing structure and the proposed AT &T antennae to be located on the structure to minimize the risk of signal interference between the two sets of antennae. 2. Materially detrimental impacts to public welfare or injuries to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; and Applicant Response: Public welfare will not be affected by the installation of the Applicant's antennae and equipment. The Applicant proposes to install the equipment within a communications shelter at the base of the existing wireless structure. The existing chain link fencing on the property would be extended to surround the proposed equipment shelter. With the extended chain link fencing and existing mature and ground vegetation on the property, the proposed equipment shelter will not be visible from the public right -of -ways. Any noise emitted by equipment within the proposed shelter will meet local and State noise requirements. The Applicant has also provided documentation from a licensed Radio Frequency Engineer stating the proposed facility will emit radiofrequency emissions below the maximum FCC exposure levels and is categorically proven safe, according to Federal Guidelines. The proposed wireless facility will not be injurious to property in the zone (R -5) or vicinity in which the property is located. The R -5 zoning district is "intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single - family dwellings." ACC 18.07.010D. 4G LTE technology is essential to meeting the voice and data needs of AT &T customers in this residential area, in their homes and in their vehicles. The existing structure owner, American Tower Corporation (ATC), will perform a thorough engineering analysis of the structure and will provide the Applicant with any required structural reinforcements to extend the structure an additional 20' and collocate its antennae on the extended structure. Both ATC and the Applicant have a national operations center, and the Applicant is capable of monitoring the proposed facility 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 3. C'onsistencti, with the spirit and pznpose ofAC C Title 18 (Zoning). Applicant Response: The purpose of ACC Title 18 (Zoning), in relevant part, "is to implement the City's comprehensive plan. [ACC Title 18 is] used to further the growth and development of the city consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and its implementing elements... [and promote] the health, safety, morals, convenience , comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the city's population." ACC 18.02.030A. Chapter 6 of the City comprehensive plan recognizes the rapid change of telecommunications technology, which for wireless service, consists of voice, messaging, and data service. C'itt, C'oniprehensive Plan, Private Utilities Element, page 6 -2. The proposal would provide ubiquitous, high quality 4G LTE wireless service in automobiles and homes in the Lakeland Hills Way and Elizabeth Avenue SE vicinity, consistent with comprehensive plan Private Utilities Element goals, objectives, and policies. The existing structure is a legal, nonconforming structure under ACC 18.70.020A.3 located within a residential use zone. The existing structure was built prior to the adoption of the present ACC Title 18. The Applicant requests approval of a Special Exception by the Hearing Examiner, to increase the structure height by 20.2 %. Under ACC 18.54.060.H, the Hearing Examiner may grant approval for a 25% increase. Consistent with ACC 18.31.1000.2, the maximum height of the extended structure will not exceed 120'. The Applicant is proposing a 20' tower extension, which will allow the Applicant's antennae the minimum height necessary to meet the coverage objectives and gap -in- service. The Applicant performed a site candidate analysis prior to selecting the subject wireless structure. This analysis is provided within the application materials (SD2442 RF Justification Letter). With the increased use of wireless communication devices and increased demand for voice and data, it has become increasingly necessary to provide wireless coverage within residential use zones. The Applicant has identified a gap -in- service along Lakeland Hills Way and the surrounding residential area, and the only available structure for collocation within the search ring area is the subject wireless structure located on Panorama Dr. SE (No Situs address listed with Pierce County). The available elevation on the existing structure is 70.9'. At 70.9' the Applicant's antennae would suffer a degraded propagation due to the existing mature trees located on the subject parcel, which range between 60' and 87' high. The Applicant's antennae must have the ability to project a signal above the existing tree line. The Applicant's antennae must also have a 9' separation from existing Verizon antennae on the structure, to ensure no signal interference between the Verizon antennae and the Applicant's antennae. The Applicant has provided Coverage Maps with existing coverage, coverage at 70.9', and coverage at 105' with tower extension (SD2442 Height Justification). RF propagation at 105' is shown to meet the existing gap -in- service, whereas propagation at 70.9' fails to cover areas along Lakeland Hills Way SE and the residential areas to the east. � at &t Your world. Delivered. SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY & ELIZABETH AVE SE PROJECT INFORMATION TEE PANORAMA DRIVE SE .E TIES E lS L_EEI.EF =E AUBURN, WA 98390 ILL BE Ell 11 'El IF, 1FTFF,;,�7,7 " LATITUDE 47G 15'22.32" N LONGITUDE 122G 13' 11.79" W GROUND ELEVATION- 575.3' " ATC #89523 GENERAL LOCATION MAP DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAWING INDEX I I— H11 11 111 11,11111 1111 Hill I St L11 10 n Fl 11 IIILL F ' "� .E „SE 131 CODE COMPLIANCE SHE ELE �n �I IL III H Iwri► - n _ _ - ZONING INFORMATION , °� ESE STREET LLi Ill _- _ _ 1002 'H VICINITYMAP - - - - - -_- HE BE - - SI - T111, 1,11 - APPROVAL /SIGN OFF OF CONSTRUCTION I - - - -- - UTILITY PURVEYOR -- �'j�HEEF - -- -HELIFFESIFEFFEESSIT - E uem s ��i ,Emo o,„S T� r 1,1�� nis - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'Hm rE""'LLE` "' °' °o'= FEEl 1�,111— SEES' 1FE, SHEET E FEE, = I Ell 111 11 ,:5- ,u , -,,;: FE El1,111—tWi EF IHS,IBEIIHFE IS EH Exhibit 2D 6qi � a t & t Yourworld Delivered PROJECT INFORMATION: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY & ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE BE AUBURN, WA 98390 ISSUED FOR: ZONING rN. � =REV HISTOO scnirnox. o „1 ,rIT E't- - 11 .. -PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206.851.1106 -DRAWN BY: -CHIC BY: =APPV. BY:: AAL BJ BO - LICENSURE: EQUIPEMENT• � HE E El F1 EIH= - DRAWING INFORMATION: IT CELLULAR SITE I PORTION OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T. 20 N., R. 5 E., W.M. 1�1..I..TXEWRM.11 CORNER Of.. CURVE TABLE 'ire 'I OE iJ'NY@ KEWRIDGE AF120001,f55002 LINE TABLE P.— t2 N92953mE 50.33 l Li N]i58E 3800 ?W. D IR. ,g 28 f / 35 29 TL# 0520062013 41.�SY 3 1R. c —14 N, IID D 53 100' MERIDIAN; (M DIM �WAI�O LEGEND: DIM PER R1 1w .,I DF1 55.' tOFEET;THENCES0U1H8'9889'EABT.A D—E-1-- PLANS PREPARED BY: Wot--73— —210 P_ 11631NINING-1— C.A �q A AAJSURN, WA 98001 PIERCE COUNTY -ISSUED FOR, DB 1AD11111MIT;111mNORfH Im W-16-13 �"�MLADWTANCE--- JRS NSY BY ... PARCEL & APV.:--= --RIG-1—N J` f1A ANOACR0881HEFOLLOWND�BCPIBEOP�PERIY: I 2--Aev`LDT9 .MCTI. ISSUE DATE: 10-18-13 UCENSURE: DRAWING IN1.71OW D— —.M.—E—e.. OTHERTMN BREIAlEO ---m I—M-1—D. T—N—M&MANN ONIIE FADE OFTIE PLAT. (2)—A,7IREE—UR--eQI- -e— V934 (J)RECORD BEHINDS HAVE BEEN ROTATED TO HEREIN (5)8� ME� 6110� HEWM WI- --Dm— D-E. "U.,WAMI (PER FIRM MAP N0. WIM M13 0, MG— 1% 1—) III ZpJINO: RS OESDEMNL) :BOON—DMMMER THIS I—DOESNOTI—ENT—.— —A—VED',— I—ITUDE 47:1 IM 13�� DEPICTION _M8tN�AT,:INGAD C LDMITU GATHE— FROM GROU-1-- MTRIS�MAVAKAiLEAM&"MMFNUND DUffiNGTIM FIELD MR— -- —A- -w c --mc. EU— (-- :EQUIPMENT: � THIBBURVEYWABPERFCDWEOWITHAI OPCIXJ �j NA JAILER: -GELEI-0NI—E—I—D—D—T03 E—E—L—ATI.— -----00RSVATIC EF—E—I--N— REELEVAT—EAUMTEW"—E- 0 at&t Your world. Delivered. PROJECT CONSULTANTS: PLANS PREPARED BY: Wot--73— —210 P_ -PROJECT INFO: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY & ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE SE AAJSURN, WA 98001 PIERCE COUNTY -ISSUED FOR, FINAL SURVEY Im W-16-13 FINALSURVEY JRS NSY BY ... =CHK: APV.:--= [DRAWN JRS I NSY JRS ISSUE DATE: 10-18-13 UCENSURE: DRAWING IN1.71OW D— —.M.—E—e.. OTHERTMN BREIAlEO ---m I—M-1—D. !II BOUNDARY & CONTROL MAP I I � go] I ra. a pijy I 35 1 !I 11 GEL U 8> T. 20 tc 5 EY''N M� �F SEA...-......-.... -- �l14 flF pflRTIflN flF \ it AF#wiz »c, 'Iz v+ewaro�� 1 3< M�J — '7 "• ------------- %%I- Y e si- T� � LINEsR� 9Ff3L 168 Ltd R72°�'3S� .SV t3 R22 ,�� 26AT 0 Kgp•9C11'yv B,.6S try vF RJR \ Y£LWR,B£R � l t \ \ \ I� f i 30 31 °wd TOT 2CIQW59 o ,aP r! ('�� wa£ CRR•FS� \ !!t9R1/ ptlN£R M£leR =wm 3< M�J — '7 "• ------------- %%I- Y e si- T� � LINEsR� 9Ff3L 168 Ltd R72°�'3S� .SV t3 R22 ,�� 26AT 0 Kgp•9C11'yv B,.6S try vF RJR \ Y£LWR,B£R � l t \ \ \ I� f i 30 31 � l \ E,EuanoN 1 J f autnan�rerea �nR ra,�,P'�RSo �SD2442 p HILLS WA's & -V� SE gve E IZA S B6 PAUB��AWAB�� FJ—tj t sv�_ isss o \ � l \ E,EuanoN 1 J f autnan�rerea �nR ra,�,P'�RSo �SD2442 p HILLS WA's & -V� SE gve E IZA S B6 PAUB��AWAB�� FJ—tj t sv�_ isss I ) TR B TR D \ (WATER TANK) WIDEUTILI,YEADEMEW s' (` BRUSH OTPEES � O pO 's 'p o; o o, 'p TLN0520062013 41,34Ot S F 0 95 AC ` \ / �Q- & /EINATO/_ � ` /—cAE (1)111 112I I AINNKFENCEMIITRANDOFen S (ETEN IN COvc wa DFw Om I MIo AN pNK FEN EE OM'., ND, a,QQ STOOP POWER METER MCETER KA11 FORENROEDIITEKTAN) =EOG E0& @EE e TS USH 0 \ ' ' sTORAGE SHED CHAIN WE BARB WWRE8 5. o, aP o �Y/l b / v Jo aIII AOEUTTICE TDwER wi NEwmTOWER / (��— win n ATIT INTENNAe /a PER BECTC \ �, - / (eEE STRUCTURA\DEeIP NFORTDWEF \ / 8 \ Ile, +� b w @ ,I\ 'E" RrA- ll"REOUROEOCEtt \ \ \ \ O TOWER LADDER _ v I V , I 1 aao 89'HUH d�-11PI ICCIER b2�TOP OF BANK / yr 4p� vd A \ \ \ q N o OF 1 \ � A \ + ° O, 11. TTHI IED OVERALL SITE PLAN N ,sCALE,:.4o V —w� o�O oT�uT�EO o COMPADT FIBER RAND RDLF v BE"EDDAATSTADTESC0EERK ICE 1011 (✓ ro \ \ M \ 5 \ OF / / / v P =- \ \y / / / y o COMPADT FIBER RAND RDLF v BE"EDDAATSTADTESC0EERK ICE 1011 (✓ ro \ \ M \ 5 \ OF / / / v P =- / / / 00 at &t Yourworld Delivered =PROJECT INFORMATION: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY 8: ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA 98390 = ISSUED FOR: ZONING =REVISION HISTORY! x. Rev -.-1uMMeN I 12/11/11 M ORREv ,e v FECREDUNEs BIT BO I FINES III BO "I1 11 J B. J. THOMAS, P.E. E 7607 80TH AV NE MARYSV I LLE, WA 98270 206.851.1106 DRAWN ": =CHID BY: —APPV. BY: AAL BJ BO LICENSURE EQUIPMENR NE`N NJ(ENN4S a NEVJEC/UIP1nENT DRAWING INFORMATION: AFL olM NAONsAimnw,sE coNSuLITRl�vrsoE awTrlls G PRE SUPERSEOEO ET TITE 10A0TESTOREVICION [—OESAPR o uMIT is �oPPEaaar ar laTURE ANrusE OR ISCLOSUREOTry R— REUTEITONAMED TO DRAWING TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN A -1 y / / / / / / 00 at &t Yourworld Delivered =PROJECT INFORMATION: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY 8: ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE SE AUBURN, WA 98390 = ISSUED FOR: ZONING =REVISION HISTORY! x. Rev -.-1uMMeN I 12/11/11 M ORREv ,e v FECREDUNEs BIT BO I FINES III BO "I1 11 J B. J. THOMAS, P.E. E 7607 80TH AV NE MARYSV I LLE, WA 98270 206.851.1106 DRAWN ": =CHID BY: —APPV. BY: AAL BJ BO LICENSURE EQUIPMENR NE`N NJ(ENN4S a NEVJEC/UIP1nENT DRAWING INFORMATION: AFL olM NAONsAimnw,sE coNSuLITRl�vrsoE awTrlls G PRE SUPERSEOEO ET TITE 10A0TESTOREVICION [—OESAPR o uMIT is �oPPEaaar ar laTURE ANrusE OR ISCLOSUREOTry R— REUTEITONAMED TO DRAWING TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN A -1 3 s TSUS Sa- wr- HST -H. uuss- s- .v - -c._ — —____f -- — — — — 1 * 9 d ENLARGED SITE PLAN N � a� at &t Yourworld Delivered = PROJECT INFORMATION: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY & ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE BE AUBURN, WA 98390 = ISSUED FOR: ZONING PLANS t = PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206.851.1106 =DRAWN BY: —CHIC BY: =APPV. BY:: AAL BJ BO = LICENSURE: -- — =EQUIP EMENT• F E IT = DRAWING INFORMATION: El ES''FEISEEEE—E-11 S11111 $1 11] C Q i EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION E1,e.1 11�TS�E1�s.1 weR exreNSmNO uTncE _ ° "�� snNC uTOSa -; v nDaw As1aPER (T Os IER OrO PeR sEOT o ON NEw OOOM OATS ATTAOIEO TO (E) TOWER DlsiRl -10II 101111101 ITOTSO z PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION E1 .1 v�TSCaTE fns . -v 00 at &t Yourworld Delivered =PRwECTINFORMAnON: SD2442 LAKELAND HILLS WAY & ELIZABETH AVE SE PANORAMA DRIVE SE AU BURN, WA 98390 = ISSUED FOR: ZONING 1zlsamT oRREv El RISJUIES 31 30 2 1 I LINES A9[N 1111111U tbl� A =PLANS PREPARED B) : B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSV I LLE, WA 98270 206.851.1106 DRAWN BY: =CHK. BY:=APPV. BY: pAL BJ BO L :] CENSURE: EQUIPMENTS N2N NJ(ENIV4S a NEVJECIUIP1nENT DRAWING INFORMATION: D M-1 INNS AIWACMSE coNS lTravrsoF awTrlls waive aaE SIJOEIESEDED EYTTE uTESrIREVISION 1UMElvrs llS oPwEI rEY lvSTURE nNruSE OR RE—TO N—D N 1111111111-0 1" DRAWING TITLE: SITE ELEVATION I A -2 I From: Madeline Chaney To: Jeff Dixon Subject: tower construction documentation for 5811 Panorama Drive SE Date: Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:12:35 AM Attachments: Pierce County Permit Information.pdf Hi Jeff, Thanks for your time on Friday taking in my applications for Verizon Wireless antenna addition at 5811 Panorama Dr. (APN 0520062013). Attached is the information that my colleague, Sarah Telschow, obtained from Pierce County back in 2009 when Verizon Wireless obtained permits for their initial installation of 9 antennas on the subject tower. This screen shot from Pierce County shows the subject tower having been constructed in 1965 for Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone's use as a microwave tower. This is the only information that was available from the County back in 2009 when Sarah was working on this site. I hope this information is helpful. Thank you, Madeline Chaney Odelia Pacific Corp. 1215 4th Ave, Suite 1900 Seattle, WA 98161 Desk -(206) 490 -3823 Mobile —(425) 346 -0128 c aneyClo elia.co Exhibit 12 I�ALs _ Yersson {i5 pi, 91 S,eryc! filtlx,A��13 1]xcr; ,�rhed C° E Exhibit I � + �[TY0F ' �� y��[ku��ayDr -� �� Ilk, N t= WASI-1 I 1,�G][ON 25 West Main Street * AubumWA98001-4998 * wwwaubumwa.gov* 253-931-3000 SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATIO Level Headed Hair Design =1117-311100M- July 1O.2O14 August 14.2O14 EhnReibnnon 5O14 Bennett Avenue GE Auburn, VVA98OQ2 Same aaApplicant Project Description: TheSpecial Home Occupation (Land Use) Permit is for ahair salon business within 8 single-family residence. The business will employ one resident-owner who will provide hair care services by appointment only, Tuesday through Gaturday, between the hours Of1O:003rn and O�OOpno. The business will occupy approximately 8U square feet /SF\of the homes floor area. Proposed Location: 5614 Bennett Avenue SE, Auburn, WA Parcel Number: 7299600140 Subject Property and Adjacent Property Comprehensive Plan Designation, Zoning, and Land Use: Special Home Occupation Permit - Level Headed Hair Design (M|814-0007 Staff Report August 12.2U14 Page AU BURN Comp ehensive Plan Zonin_9_ Current Land Use Project Site Single-Family PUD, Planned Unit Single-family Residence Residential Development North Single-Family PUD, Planned Unit Single-family Residence Residential Development South Single-Family PUD, Planned Unit Single-family Residence Residential Development East Single-Family PUD, Planned Unit Single-family Residence Residential Development West Single-Family PUD, Planned Unit Single-family Residence Residential DevetopnjerA.. Special Home Occupation Permit - Level Headed Hair Design (M|814-0007 Staff Report August 12.2U14 Page AU BURN U' SEPA STATUS: Exempt per Auburn Code (\CC)10.O0.O20 and Washington Administrative C0d8(AAAC) Section 197-11-800(6)(b). UL FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Erin R8ib[08D (Applicant and Property Owner) submitted 8n application (^Enhibd2") for 8 Special Home Occupation Permit OD July 10,2014 for 8 hair salon business hnbeoperated within an existing 1,608SF (approximate) single-family dwelling. 2. The single-family dwelling has 8D attached garage; and one paved off-street parking space. The parcel is approximately 4'OOOSF(O.OS acres) per King County Department Of Assessment's website records and the City's GIS aerial imagery. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designation Of the parcel iS"SiOg|8-F8rnik/ResidenU@|" This designation is implemented by the zODiOQ d8SSifiC8UOO of the Site as 8 Planned Unit [}ev8|Opn0eni(PUU). Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 18.69. P|@OD8d Unit Oov8|OpDleDt. was n3pe8|8d in April of 2006 per Ordinance No. 5091. However, the property i3 g[8Ddf@thenedtO the development standards Of that Chapter. Special Home Occupation Permit - Level Headed Hair Design (M|S14-O0O7) Staff Report August 12.2014 Page 4. The purpose of the "Planned Unit Development" zone was as follows: "18.69.010 Purpose The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through innovative and alternative development standards. A PUD district also allows for a greater range of residential development scenarios, provides for internal transfers of density, and may result in more dwelling units than may be realized by using the existing development standards." 5. According to the written statement ( "Exhibit 2 ") provided as part of the application materials, the Applicant has been a licensed cosmetologist for over 11 years, and has operated a salon out of her residence for approximately 9.5 years at a different location. 6. The Applicant has stated that the home occupation will only employ one resident -owner who will offer hair care services such as cutting, coloring, makeup and styling by appointment only. There will be no employees that do not reside at the premises. 7. Based on the Applicant's statement, up to 4 clients are anticipated per day. The number of clients will vary depending on the type of hair care service being provided during the appointment. All clients will be seen by appointment only. 8. The Home Occupation will occupy approximately 90SF of the home's den and half bath. 9. No signage is proposed for the Home Occupation. 10. While the completed application form submitted to the city indicates the home occupation's hours of operation are proposed to be five days a week (Tuesday through Friday, from 10:00am to 6:00pm, and on Saturdays from 10:00am to 5:00pm. The City assesses a traffic impact fee when any land use results in additional trips generated between the PM peak hour of 4:00pm and 6:00pm, per requirements contained in ACC 19.04.040. As a result, the Applicant has revised the Tuesday through Saturday hours of operation from 9:00am to 4:00pm in an e -mail dated August 5, 2014 to avoid generating trips in the PM peak hour (typically Monday - Friday, 4:00- 6:00pm) and imposition of the traffic impact fee by the City. Please see "Exhibit 2" 11. Staff conducted a site visit on August 6, 2014 to verify the existing site conditions. 12. City code provides the following definition related to the proposed business type: "18.04.710 Personal service shop. "Personal service shop" means premises devoted to hair styling, cutting or permanents, manicurists, custom tailoring, and similar related uses. (Ord. 6245 § 3, 2009; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 13. The purpose of the city's home occupation regulations is as follows: "18.60.010 Purpose Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 3 The purpose of a home occupation is to allow certain activities to be undertaken for gain or profit within a dwelling or a building accessory to a dwelling in any zone in which dwellings are present. The home occupation shall be conducted by a resident of the dwelling unit and is to be conducted in such a manner that the residence shall not differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials, construction, lighting, signs or the emissions of sounds, noises, vibrations or odors, or result in traffic impacts that are inconsistent with the character of the area in which the home occupation is located." 14. In accordance with the home occupation regulations (ACC 18.60.040(A)), certain types of businesses including "personal service shop" home occupations require a Special Home Occupation Permit to be granted by the Hearing Examiner and the home occupation must meet at least 11 out of the 13 criteria ACC 18.60.020(A) through (M), as follows: "18.60.040 Special home occupation permit. A. Special home occupation permits are required and must be granted by the hearing examiner for the following uses, even if the use meets all of the requirements of ACC 18.60.020(A) through (M), but in no case shall any home occupation meet less than 11 of the 13 requirements: 1. Building and construction contractor services, to include landscaping services (unless the home occupation is solely used for office purposes); 2. Personal service shops; 3. Music and dancing studios; 4. Craft classes; 5. Animal grooming; 6. Home occupations that can only meet 11 or 12 of the 13 requirements as outlined in ACC 18,60.020(A) through (M). B. In considering applications for special home occupation permits, the hearing examiner shall consider the nature and conditions of all adjacent uses and structures. No such special home occupation permit shall be authorized by the hearing examiner unless the hearing examiner finds that: 1. The authorizing of such special home occupation permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; and 2. The authorization of such special home occupation permit will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this title. C. In authorizing a special home occupation permit, the hearing examiner may impose such requirements and conditions with respect to location, installation, construction, maintenance and operation and extent of open spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this title, as may be deemed necessary for the protection of other properties in the zone or vicinity and the public interest. D. A public hearing shall be conducted on all applications for a special home occupation permit. The hearing shall be held in the same manner as provided in ACC 18.70.040. (Ord. 6141 § 1, 2007; Ord. 4304 § 1(44), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987,)" (Emphasis added) Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 4 15. In accordance with the home occupation regulations (ACC 18.60.020) the home occupation must meet at least 11 out of the 13 criteria ACC 18.60.020(A) through (M), as follows: "18.60.020 Requirements A. Only members of the immediate family residing on the premises and no more than one non - resident may be employed at any one time; provided, that home occupations with a nonresident employee shall provide off- street parking for the employee on site. B, No mechanical equipment is used except such as is commonly or customarily used for domestic, household or personal purposes for a dwelling unit (or as deemed similar in terms of power, quantity, noise, emissions and type). C. Not more than one - fourth of the floor area of any building is devoted to such occupation, except for bed and breakfasts. D. That such occupation shall not require internal or external alteration or involve construction features not customarily found in a dwelling. E. The home occupation shall not involve the use of personal commercial vehicles as defined in ACC 18.04,245 for the distribution of materials to or from the premises. Deliveries or pickups by commercial delivery services shall not apply toward this limitation provided such pickup or delivery does not exceed twice per day. F. The conduct of any home occupation, including but not limited to the storage of goods and equipment, shall not reduce or render unusable areas provided for the required off - street parking. Additional parking is not allowed in order to conduct a home occupation, except what may be required through the issuance of a special home occupation permit pursuant to ACC 18.60.040. C. Only one sign is permitted, not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches in area, non - illuminated, and attached to a building, except that home occupations in commercial or industrial zones may have signs consistent with the applicable zoning district. H. No display pertaining to the occupation, other than the one permitted sign, is visible from the street or adjacent residences. I. No more animals are maintained on the premises than what may otherwise be permitted in the zone. J. Except for bed and breakfasts, employee and customer visits shall be limited to the following hours of operation: 1. Employees from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p,m. Monday through Friday and from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; 2. Customers from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday; 3. No employee or customer visits shall be permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 5 K. Traffic generated by the home occupation shall be limited to a maximum of eight (two -way) client /delivery - related trips per day for those home occupations that operate by appointment only and do not have overlapping client visits. All other home occupations shall be limited to five (two -way) client /delivery trips per day. L. Outdoor storage of materials, goods, products or equipment is not allowed. M. The home occupation is to be conducted in such a manner that the residence shall not differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials, construction, lighting, signs, or the emissions of sounds, noises, vibrations or odors or result in traffic impacts inconsistent with the character of the area in which the home occupation is located." 16. Per ACC Table 18.52.020, "Off- Street Parking Requirements by Land Use ", two off - street parking spaces are required per single - family dwelling. The dwelling unit meets the minimum of two parking spaces; one in the garage and the other in the driveway, in front of the garage. 17. A combined Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing ( "Exhibit 4 ") was issued on, or before August 6, 2014. The public hearing notice was issued a minimum of 15 days prior to the public hearing as required by ACC 2.46.130 and ACC 14.07.030. The notice was advertised in the newspaper, posted at the Site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of Site. 18. The City received two (2) comment letters on the project and the City sent responses (by e -mail) to the concerned parties on August 12, 2014, ( "Exhibits 8 and 9 "). The concerns raised in the letters were that the proposed home occupation is not in compliance with the Homeowner's Association's Declaration, Section 6.2, `Residential use', which states: `7n fact businesses are expressly not allowed in the Association without prior approval of the Board." As stated in the Staff's response to the commenters, compliance of the property owner with the Homeowner's Association (HOA) regulations is outside the scope of the City's authority and is a matter between the HOA and the property owner. IV. CONCLUSIONS: As indicated above, the City's home occupation regulations as detailed in ACC 18.60.040 provide certain approval criteria for Special Home Occupation permits. What follows are the criteria (in italics) and a staff analysis of how the proposal compares to the criteria: "113.60.040 Special home occupation permit. A. Special home occupation permits are required and must be granted by the hearing examiner for the following uses, even if the use meets all of the requirements of ACC 18.60,020(A) through (M), but in no case shall any home occupation meet less than 11 of the 13 requirements; 2. Personal service shops;" (emphasis added) Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 6 Staff Analysis The home occupation is a 'personal service shop' home occupation that can meet at least 11 of the 13 requirements per ACC 18.60.020(A) though (M). The Applicant, who will reside at the home, is the only employee, Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(A) that requires only members of the immediate family residing on the premises and no more than one non - resident may be employed. The Applicant indicates in the submitted application materials that no mechanical equipment will be used in the operation of the home occupation other than are typically found within a dwelling unit (i.e. hair dryer). Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(B) requiring no mechanical equipment be used except such as is commonly used for household purposes. The Applicant states that approximately 90SF of the home's den and half -bath will be used for the home occupation, which is less than % of the floor area of the 1,608SF single - family home (inclusive of garage) as identified in the King County Department of Assessments website records. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(C). While no alternations are proposed, due to the nature of the business going into a single- family residence, the installation of a backflow prevention device is required. The backflow prevention device is required by the City's Water Utility Division to ensure protection of the public water system and water supply, Per City of Auburn Public Works Design Standards, Section 7.01.2.1(11) a backflow prevention assembly is now required for domestic service, The home occupation will be conditioned so that the business license for the Special Home Occupation Permit will not be issued until a Plumbing Permit has been approved for the backflow device and these have been inspected by the City, Staff finds that the home occupation proposal as conditioned meets ACC 18.60.020(D). The Applicant indicates in the submitted application materials that the home occupation will not involve the use of commercial vehicles, which are defined in ACC 18.04.245 as semi -truck tractors and /or semi- trailers over 26,001 pounds gross vehicle weight. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(E). The home occupation will not reduce or render unusable areas provided for required off - street parking associated with the residential use. The current dwelling unit has the required minimum of two improved parking spaces per City standards of ACC Table 18.52.020. As the home occupation operates by appointment only and no overlapping customer visits are proposed, there is sufficient parking for the proposed use. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(F) since the proposal will not obstruct existing parking or construct new parking. The Applicant is not proposing signs for the occupation. Staff finds that the home occupation is meets ACC 18.60.020(G). The home occupation will not involve any display. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(H). Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 7 The home occupation will not involve additional pets beyond what would otherwise be allowed in any residence. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(1) since the home occupation will not have more animals than what may otherwise be permitted in the zone. The proposed hours of operation for the home occupation are Tuesday through Saturday, 10:00am to 4:00pm, with no customer appointments after 4:00pm, avoiding vehicle trips in the PM peak hour and the City transportation impact fee. As such, Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(J) The home occupation will not operate on Sundays or Mondays. The home occupation's hours of operation are proposed to be five days a week (Tuesday through Saturday) 10:00am to 4:00pm (revised from the originally proposed hours of Tuesday through Friday 10:00am to 6:00pm, and Saturday 10:00am to 5:00pm). Also, the business will not include any non- resident employees to add vehicle trips during prescribed hours of operation. The Applicant anticipates that 4 clients are anticipated per day which does not exceed the maximum of eight (two -way) client /delivery - related trips per day for those home occupations that operate by appointment only and do not have overlapping client visits as allowed per ACC 18.60.020(K). The Special Home Occupation Permit will be conditioned so that the home occupation does not exceed 8 clients per day. As conditioned, Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(K). The Applicant indicates that there will be no outdoor storage of materials, goods, products, or equipment for the home occupation. Staff finds that the home occupation meets ACC 18.60.020(L). As no exterior alterations or signage are proposed, the home occupation will be conducted in manner such that the home will not differ aesthetically in character from a residence. It is not anticipated that there will be any emissions of sounds and noises non - residential in character. The home occupation will only operate from 10:00am to 4:00pm, and for comparison, construction noises in residential zones are allowed until 7:00pm. Customer drop -offs and pick -ups will not be allowed between 4:00pm and 6:00pm unless the traffic impact fee is paid, The City's transportation staff has identified no traffic safety, flow, or other anticipated traffic impacts. Staff finds the request meets the criterion ACC 18,60.020(M) as conditioned herein. A. In considering applications for special home occupation permits, the hearing examiner shall consider the nature and conditions of all adjacent uses and structures. No such special home occupation permit shall be authorized by the hearing examiner unless the hearing examiner finds that: 1. The authorizing of such special home occupation permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located; and 2. The authorization of such special home occupation permit will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this title. Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 8 Staff Analysis Authorization of the Special Home Occupation Permit for the `personal service shop' will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, with the staff recommended conditions. The home occupation meets 13 out of the 13 criteria and the business license will be conditioned to ensure that at least 11 out of the 13 criteria of ACC 18.60.020(A) though (M)are met, Consistent with the purpose of home occupation regulations, the home occupation is undertaken for gain or profit within a dwelling, the home occupation is conducted by a resident of the existing dwelling, and the home occupation will not differ in character from that of a residence, as conditioned. As a result, the proposal is not detrimental to nearby residential environment and consistent with the intent of the PUD, Planned Unit Development zone, Staff finds the request meets the criterion, as conditioned. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based upon the application, accompanying materials, Findings of Fact, and Conclusions, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the Special Horne Occupation Permit with the Conditions of Approval set forth below. Any deviations from the project description, exhibits, timing, or conditions must be reviewed and approved by the City of Auburn for conformity with this approval. Any change from these may require approval of changes to the permit and /or environmental review. 1. The Special Home Occupation shall only operate between the hours of 10:00am and 4:00pm, Tuesday through Saturday. 2. No customer arrivals or departures shall occur between the hours of 4:00pm and 6:00pm, unless the applicable traffic impact fee is paid in accordance with ACC Chapter 19.04, `Transportation Impact Fees'. 3. No business license shall be issued until a plumbing permit has been approved and inspected for the satisfactory installation of the backflow prevention device. 4. The Special Home Occupation shall not have more than 8 scheduled client trips per day (8 clients, each with an associated two -way trip). 5. Applicant must obtain and maintain in good standing a City of Auburn business license for the duration of the Special Home Occupation. Special Home Occupation Permit — Level Headed Hair Design (MIS14 -0007) Staff Report August 12, 2014 Page 9 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Prepared Staff Report Special HOrn8 {)CCUp8tiOn Permit Application Materials: ° Completed Application Form IN Letter OfAuthorization ° Written statement � Site plan/floor plan " Supplemental Sheet for Home Occupations � E-mail Correspondence with Applicant dated July 30, 2014 � E-mail Correspondence with Applicant dated August 5.2O14 2012 Aerial photo of the site and vicinity Notice ofApp|icodon/Noiice of Public Hearing Affidavit Of Publication Affidavit OfMailing Affidavit OfPosting COnn[n8nt Letter from Ginger Rodgers, dated August 7' 2014 and Staff response dated August 12' 2014 Comment Letter from Edg8Vievv Division 2 HC)A Board of Directors, dated August 8' 2014 and staff response dated August 12. 2014 EdQ8vievv 2 Declaration Of Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions and First Amendment provided by Ginger Rodgers 16 | ~~ DATE Special Home Occupation Permit - Level Headed Hair Design VN|S14-00O7 Staff Report August 12.2014 Page 10 .OF CITY OF AUBURN Planning & Development Department wUBURN Auburn City Hall Annex, 2r" Floor WASHINGTON 1 East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001-4998 Tel: 253.931.3090 Fax: 253.804,3114 permitcenter(cDaubumwa.gov www.auburnwa.gov Exhibit 2 SUBMITTAL DATE: LAND USE DESIGNATION: COTTY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION "r-'ruAl."; APPLICANT: Nise mailing address for meeting notifl' ation. vCheck box if Primary Contact COMPANY: ADDRESS: (CITY STATE, ZIP) PHONE4 'J,l,J,', )ti l FAX: E-MAIL: SIGNATURE:- PRINTED NAM A (Signature Required) APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE., U Check box if Primary Contact ir� COMPANY: ADDRESS: (CITY, STATE, ZIP) PHONE: FAX: SIGNATURE: (Signature Required) E-MAIL: RINTED NAME: PROPERTY OWNER(S): EAttach separa�e sheet if needed. ❑ Check box if Primary Contact COMPANY: 2 't � 10i IMlt t ADDRESS: r 6te - (CITY, STATE, ZIP) fl PHONE: FAX: E-MAIL: SIGNATURE: --PRINTED NAME: (Signature Required) Note: Applicant or representative must have p op r4y owner's consent to file this application form in order for it to be accepted PROPERTY INFORMATION (REQUIRED) SITE EXISTING USE OF SITE: ASSESS, j S PARCE ID LOT SIZE ZOJJNG DISTRICT SEY USE OF SITE- V J AREA TO DEVELOPED (s.f.): ADBURN HOME OCCUPATION WASHINGTON ING`CON APPLICATION Date Submitted: Please describe in detail the business activity involved and if you will be having customers to your home: /,, ' MtL- CL �- - 1j f Planned days and hours of operation: W ISd q f 'a' l I E� Refer to Auburn City Code (ACC) 18,60.020 (J) Type of equipment to be used. Refer to ACC 18, 60, 020 (8) Will commercial vehicles be parking at your home? Yes or No Number of employees working within the home other than yourself? Refer to ACC 18.60.020 (A) Is offstreet parking available for employees? Yes _ or No Area of home (square feet) to be used for business: 0 Refer to ACC 18.60.020 (C) Will alterations of your home be required? Yes or No Refer to ACC 18.60.020 (D) Size & number of signs: Refer to ACC 18.60.020 (G &H) For office use Planning Department recommendation: Bus. Reg. # Approved: Special Home Occupation Permit Required: Yes No Approved with following conditions: Applicant must observe Auburn City Code 18.60.020 requirements. If you have any questions, please contact the Permit Center at (253) 931 -3020. * CITY OF AUBURN Tror• AaIJU�1.1 V Planning & Development Department - WASHINGTON Auburn City Hall Annex, 2 "d Floor 1 East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 -4998 Tel: 253.931.3090 Fax: 253.804.3114 pe rm itce nterP-a u burnwa, qoy www.auburnwa.gov SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION APPLICATION LETTER FROM PROPERTY OWNER GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TO ACT (A cop�y of this letter must be submitted for each property owner involved) 1, �C�,1� � , . � *A ,on W/1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington as follows; 1. 1 am the owner of the property that is the subject of the application. 2. 1 ] have not appointed anyone, or [ ] have appointed to act as my agent regarding this application. 3. All statements, answers, and information submitted with this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 4. 1 agree to hold the City of Auburn harmless as to any claim (including costs, expenses and attorney's fees incurred in the investigation of such claim) which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and filed against the City of Auburn, but only where such claim arises out of the reliance of the City, including its officers and employees, upon the accuracy of the information provided to the City as part of this application. 5. 1 hereby grant permission for representatives of the City of Auburn and any other Federal, State, or local unit of government with regulatory authority over the project to enter onto my property to inspect the property, take photographs, and post public notices as required in connection with review of this application and for compliance with the terms and conditions of permits and approvals issued for the project. il�ww) Signature Printed Name Date City and State w erei signed F-eflatf-&—el SZE`- Address Erin Reibman Level Headed Hair Design 5614 Bennett Ave SE Auburn, WA 98001 206.229.3493 erin.lhhd("') gmail.com City of Auburn Planning & Development Dept. 1 East Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 To Wham It May Concern; I'm writing you today to explain the nature of my business, to obtain a Special Home Occupation Permit. I have been a licensed Cosmetologist for over 11 years. I have owned my own business for the same length of time. Other than 1.5 years, I have always worked from home. My business is called Level Headed Hair Design. I offer haircuts, hair coloring, makeup, and styling services to men, women, and children. I have no employees. I run it solely by myself. My business is by appointment only. I do not take walk ins. Thus, assuring there is only one client and vehicle at a time. My working days and hours are Tuesday - Friday, 10am until 6pm. Saturday, 10am until 5pm. Only the front den and half bathroom of my home are for the use of the business. This space equals 90 square feet. There are no chemicals used that release any type of fume or odor, as I only use ammonia free based product lines. These are safer for the environment than products containing ammonia. I carry a $1,000,000 business insurance policy, as required by the state of Washington. I've also never had a lapse in my Washington State Business License, or my Cosmetology License. Thank you for your time. I can be contacted at the phone number or email address listed above, at any time, if question should arise. SinncDe�jr/ely, aa 611razj_�.,_ Erin M. Reibman Level Headed Hair Design :gi - R, ti -Z 1, oz YAA U-01 cly)-V 7 * vU- CITY OF AUBURN Planning &Development Department w TS HINCA0N Auburn City Hall Annex, 2nd Floor 1 East Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 -4998 Tel: 253.931.3090 Fax: 253,804.3114 permitcenterRauburnwa.gov www.auburnwa.00v SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION APPLICATION SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION - SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST DIGITAL COPIES OF WRITTEN MATERIALS & GRAPHICS Please provide a labeled readable compact disc(s) containing digital versions of all submitted written materials and plans and graphics for use by the City of Auburn during the special home occupation application review process. Staff will use this information in report preparation and public noticing so please be sure to provide current and accurate information. Written materials should be submitted to be compatible with Microsoft Office desktop software products. Plans and graphics should be submitted in pdf or of format. APPLICATION FEES - Make checks payable to the City of Auburn All application fees, including, but not limited to: Special Home Occupation Fee. Some fees will not be invoiced until actual costs are known. Link to current fee schedule can be found @ httn✓/www.auburnwa. pov /community /about /forms. asp. WRITTEN MATERIALS — Total of ten (10) copies unless otherwise noted 10 A. APPLICATION FORM Provide a completed application form signed by the property owner(s) and /or applicant with the completed Special Home Occupation Application Submittal Checklist. (One original and 9 copies) B. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Provide a letter of authorization to act contained within this application packet inclusive of all required signatures. C. WRITTEN STATEMENT addressing: ❑ In detail, a description of your request for a special home occupation permit; and ❑ Why the special home occupation should be issued, relating to approval criteria listed on pg. 2 of this application packet. PLANS & GRAPHICS - Total of ten (10) copies unless otherwise noted A. SCALE & LEGIBILITY All plans, except architectural elevations, should be to scale (engineering scale) on paper no larger than 24x36 ", at 1" =100' or larger (1 " =50' preferred). An index sheet of the same size is required for multi -sheet submittals. All plans should be folded to fit a legal size file jack. lei an or t wnsstNcroN SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION APPLICATION C. SITE PLAN DRAWING — GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION The following graphic features shall be shown on the drawing: ( North arrow, numeric /graphic scale, and date plan was prepared; 2. Boundaries and dimensions of the property; 3 Adjacent public streets; ❑ 4. Easements, existing and proposed; ❑ 5. Location and size of all existing and proposed utilities; Location of buildings, including setbacks; Location and layout of off - street parking; ❑ 9. Location and height of fences,; 10. Location and size of signs; V, Points of access, interior streets, and driveways; ❑ 13. Location of refuse storage locations, bicycle parking areas and pedestrian /bike paths; 5/(0 VICINITY MAP A vicinity map sufficient to define the property location and boundaries. 7 David Jones From: Erin Reibman [erin.lhhd @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:04 PM To: David Jones Subject: Re: Home Occupation Requirements Attachments: bus.plot.jpeg Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Hi David- Thanks so much for sending this. I copied and pasted below, and answered in If l[.....I.... ink to make it easier to read. I've also attached another site plan showing the business space and bathroom space provided for the business. Please let me know if there's anything else I need. Thanks again. Erin Reibman Home occupations are required to have a business license as issued by the city, comply with all city codes and ordinances, and shall be consistent with the following provisions: A. Only members of the immediate family residing on the premises and no more than one nonresident may be employed at any one time; provided, that home occupations with a nonresident employee shall provide off - street parking for the employee on site; I dun, c, no ^i,.- nI,:)lla,: :)yees, a i; --i�:l - nei,.n1! ei[ -s a:-:)f fai,.nlilly B. No mechanical equipment is used except such as is commonly or customarily used for domestic, household or personal purposes for a dwelling unit (or as deemed similar in terms of power, quantity, noise, emissions and type); M:".) n s q U li l,,: i"ne Irl t li S U set,:i Is t;::na: :n i..n i t,:k: :n i. -ne stli t;::n lit ^ i,.n ft,: :n Ir° ^x a i,..n I;:) II ^, a:; t,:h fir ^ Ir° . C. Not more than one - fourth of the floor area of any building is devoted to such occupation, except for bed and breakfasts 1 1 1 n:° total s ]I utir:° °°tw7., bc" l' n: dn°mc, as anwcc used 601° tn:° Ibalailrt aa will : () aqU..tlr° ^ feet, sta: yilrt well belt „ :) t,: :ulri ^ D. That such occupation shall not require internal or external alteration or involve construction features not customarily found in a dwelling; l'�do altcn,atad.MS M' Wnnstru. c,tad. °nn dnun.nn..bcs 8d. °n• d. °CCLAq:MUt. °nn. E. The home occupation shall not involve the use of personal commercial vehicles as defined in ACC 18.04.245 for the distribution of materials to or from the premises. Deliveries or pickups by commercial delivery services shall not apply toward this limitation provided such pickup or delivery does not exceed twice per day; I'dd.° qua: °Y°a,tid. °nn 0 m�oa: °Y° °uwY.A ...F.II „i^ a,::)ir'flr �J^Illiv^ir °lip ^a:.n a,::)Alla,:I be by J If::: : a:; ir tlir.n^s F. The conduct of any home occupation, including but not limited to the storage of goods and equipment, shall not reduce or render unusable areas provided for the required off - street parking. Additional parking is not allowed in order to conduct a home occupation, except what may be required through the issuance of a special home occupation permit pursuant to ACC 18.60.040; W✓ d� [),„ wY.q�q�d. °annt�uoa: °nnt d. °nnV,;. nnd.° wY.�:l�:latad. °nn Y.d q�wY.rl.ann.b, lillll be in ^ ^Q;:;l ^J, II a,: :)irtlly scI"ie(:;lUll ^ a,; :)irt ^ , litll"i �,:dir°li em-..,,i I)air°kiiri a:; valillabII ^. G. Only one sign is permitted, not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches in area, nonilluminated, and attached to a building, except that home occupations in commercial or industrial zones may have signs consistent with the applicable zoning district; I'�do s'Q.b, s posted at aH H. No display pertaining to the occupation, other than the one permitted sign, is visible from the street or adjacent residences; I'�do s'..b, s °Y• (:lartipda,)"rti qua: °Y°cwY.annann .b, ^� :add d:��:° aYatia: °�:1. L No more animals are maintained on the premises than what may otherwise be permitted in the zone; II ta:;t i.n li II �:I a :. :) s tl °1 a:;t t it e i..a a:;t li ir't li in U'-i ^ t ^irt c ^a;:,l...li in yair :I a:-:)f II °i ^ ire^ s lit"J ^ in ce (JUII'ilrlg I!b U §i in ^ s s I11(".) aA it °S . J. Except for bed and breakfasts, employee and customer visits shall be limited to the following hours of operation: [4is'fflc s did. °a'vs 61'm . Sau'11' a')„ d 011M ... „qm 1. Employees from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, 2. Customers from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; K. Traffic generated by the home occupation shall be limited to a maximum of eight (two -way) client/delivery- related trips per day for those home occupations that operate by appointment only and do not have overlapping client visits. All other home occupations shall be limited to five (two -way) client /delivery trips per day; "Il d c ^ s "^ , q q .b,a:° a. °8, ..:d. wY.q:�q:�a. °antlt�'pVc"Ms q el. 4:a', /. d:�a.Y.,�tiIXn'n4: °,�b,�b IX,�o wY.:7:7a. °IXn'tlt� "p'V4. °n'tlt ¢. °n'tld� /. i.,'IXtd'Y wY.n'tl wY."+,4: °P'wY.,.. L. Outdoor storage of materials, goods, products or equipment is not allowed; .:' \.H sta. °P -a,. "c as td�c, I'�d o ° j t (:l a. od , s to :: :sir °a:;t ^ a,: :) t a:;t ir't y ki ir't �,:d It U s ^a, :d . M. The home occupation is to be conducted in such a manner that the residence shall not differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials, construction, lighting, signs, or the emissions of sounds, noises, vibrations or odors or result in traffic impacts inconsistent with the character of the area in which the home occupation is located. I'�da.° cQ. °A01'.:::: sir "�a:.nlir "�.��::tlia,::�ir "�, Illi 11 °�tliir "� . IM:: :) irii:: :)lise M :. :) tlr'aa ffic Mtll °i U'-ie a: irea , On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, David Jones <dljonesC®auburnwa.gov> wrote: Hi Erin, As we discussed, below are the 13 criteria needed to be met (11 of 13 minimum) as we discussed. Also, if possible, on your site plan, could you identify the rooms that will be used with the square footage. Home occupations are required to have a business license as issued by the city, comply with all city codes and ordinances, and shall be consistent with the following provisions: A. Only members of the immediate family residing on the premises and no more than one nonresident may be employed at any one time; provided, that home occupations with a nonresident employee shall provide off - street parking for the employee on site; B. No mechanical equipment is used except such as is commonly or customarily used for domestic, household or personal purposes for a dwelling unit (or as deemed similar in terms of power, quantity, noise, emissions and type); C. Not more than one - fourth of the floor area of any building is devoted to such occupation, except for bed and breakfasts; D. That such occupation shall not require internal or external alteration or involve construction features not customarily found in a dwelling; E. The home occupation shall not involve the use of personal commercial vehicles as defined in ACC 18.04.245 for the distribution of materials to or from the premises. Deliveries or pickups by commercial delivery services shall not apply toward this limitation provided such pickup or delivery does not exceed twice per day; F. The conduct of any home occupation, including but not limited to the storage of goods and equipment, shall not reduce or render unusable areas provided for the required off - street parking. Additional parking is not allowed in order to conduct a home occupation, except what may be required through the issuance of a special home occupation permit pursuant to ACC 18.60.040; G. Only one sign is permitted, not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches in area, nonilluminated, and attached to a building, except that home occupations in commercial or industrial zones may have signs consistent with the applicable zoning district; H. No display pertaining to the occupation, other than the one permitted sign, is visible from the street or adjacent residences; I. No more animals are maintained on the premises than what may otherwise be permitted in the zone; J. Except for bed and breakfasts, employee and customer visits shall be limited to the following hours of operation: 1. Employees from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, 2. Customers from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; K. Traffic generated by the home occupation shall be limited to a maximum of eight (two -way) client/delivery- related trips per day for those home occupations that operate by appointment only and do not have overlapping client visits. All other home occupations shall be limited to five (two -way) client /delivery trips per day; L. Outdoor storage of materials, goods, products or equipment is not allowed; M. The home occupation is to be conducted in such a manner that the residence shall not differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials, construction, lighting, signs, or the emissions of sounds, noises, vibrations or odors or result in traffic impacts inconsistent with the character of the area in which the home occupation is located. Thanks! David L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner Community Development & Public Works Department City of Auburn, WA 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 Phone: 253.804.5031 Fax: 253.804.3114 The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and /or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e -mail. Thank you. David Jones From: erin.lhhd @gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:03 AM To: David Jones Subject: Re: Traffic Impact Fees (MIS(14 -0007) Glad you caught that! That was my mistake. Correction should read new business operating hours as Tuesday - Saturday loam to 4pm. Thank you! Erin Reibman Level Headed Hair Design On Aug 5, 2014, at 10:29 AM, David Jones <dl`ones c®auburnwa.gov> wrote: Hi Erin, in your letter you stated you would operate on Saturdays as well. Do you wish to remove that from your stated business days /hours? David L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner 253.804.5031 From: erin.lhhdCogmail.com [mailto:erin.lhhdCogmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 10:29 AM To: David Jones Subject: Re: Traffic Impact Fees (MIS(14 -0007) David, Thank you for the information regarding the peak hour traffic fee. After considering the added cost, I would like to proceed with changing my business hours of operation. My new hours will be Tuesday- Friday, loam till 4pm. Again, thank you for the information. Please let me know if anything else is needed to make this change. Erin Reibman Level Headed Hair Design On Aug 5, 2014, at 10:25 AM, David Jones <dl`ones c®auburnwa.uov> wrote: Good morning, Erin. As a follow -up to our phone conversation, I wanted to confirm that your stated hours of operation fall in what is considered the PM peak hour (4pm — 6pm)per ACC 19.04.040, and are subject to a traffic impact fee of $3,121.16. As requested, I wanted to provide this information asap to allow the opportunity to review and take this information into consideration. Please let me know how you wish to proceed. David L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner Community Development & Public Works Department City of Auburn, WA 25 West Main Street I Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 Phone: 253.804.5031 1 Fax: 253.804.3114 The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and /or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e -mail. Thank you. The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and /or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e -mail. Thank you. Exhibit 3 LHHD Vicinity Map ,, Mi " +'�w N', PL ov Itl^uP,�Y Printed Date:7/31/2014 Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. N W E S Exhibit 4 CQ[Y(�F , '��i��` Nancy B3ck��K�Qy0r �� WAS 1-11 N GTO N 25 West Main Street + Auburn WA98OO|-4998 wwwaubumwa.gov*28-93l-3000 NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Level Headed Hair Design The City of Auburn is issuing a Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing for the following described project. Thepermitapp|imationandany|ishadetudiesmaybereviovvedattheAuburn Planning and Development Department at1 East Main Street, 2' nu Floor, Customer Service Center, Auburn, VVASO0U1. Proposal: The Special Home{}ccuoadon(LandUae) PannUisforahairsa|unbuainesovvhhina single-family residence. The business will employ one resident-owner who will provide hair care services by appointment only, Tuesday through Saturday, between the hours of 10am and 6pm. ThebunineosvviUoocupyopproximate|ygOSFofthehorneefloorarma(5.096of1.8O8GF).The business will occupy nomore than |4of the dwelling's floor area. Location: The proposal is located ed5014 Bennett Avenue SE, Auburn, VVA98OQ2. within the GVV |4of Section 32-21-O5.King County Assessor Parcel No. 72S96O014O. Notice ofApplication: August O,2O14 Notice ofCompleteness: August 1.2O14 Application: July 1O.2O14 File No. M|S14'0007 Applicant/ Property Owner: Erin Reibman 5614 Bennett Avenue SE Auburn, VVAS8OA2 Studies/Plans Submitted With Application: ° N/A Other Permits, Plans, and Approvals ToBe Prepared: ~ City ofAuburn Business License Statement of Consistency and List of Applicable Development Regulations: This proposal ia subject to and shall be consistent with the Auburn City Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Public Works Design and Construction Standards. Public Comment Period: All persons may comment on this application. Comments must be in writing and received by the end of the 15-day comment period at 5:00 pm oil August 20, 2014 to the mailing address nf25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA, S8OO1-4&Q8orot the hearing. Any person wishing to become a party of record, shall include in their comments that they wish to receive notice of any hearings, if relevant; request a copy of decisions once made; and be made aware of appeal rights. For questions regarding this project, p|eaoeoontontDavidLJones.A|CP.GeniorP|onnerot or(253)8O4-5031. Public Hearing: The Hearing Examiner will conduct a public hearing on the Special Home Occupation Permit at City Hall Council Chambers, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, Washington 98001 on Wednesday, August 2O'2O14atS:3Opmm. �� B U R N':� kA()I',[TI- I A N YOU}M AG I NFD NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING — MIS14 -0007 (Continued) nmi�lmi unn�i � r � Page 2 of 2 c"�C. he Seattle ("1C. imes City of Auburn, Finance Dept City Clerk 25 W Main St Auburn, WA 98001 Re: Advertiser Account # 107302 Ad #: 459642 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish Agency Account #: 0 Agency Name: Affidavit of Publication The undersigned, on oath states that he /she is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times has been approved as a legal newspaper by others of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distrib- uted to its subscribers during all of the said period. Exhibit 5 Agent ;,�',,,;� °;:n,,,, " ,e.+ f:, gat Sin ure,.,.�....��,,��.;�.�. Subscribed and sworn to before me on r mA E ;A �4 (Notary S`gnatiif;i) Notary Public in aid forthe State of Washington, residing at Seattle ► 1 Re: Advertiser Account # 107302 Ad #: 459642 Agency Account #: 0 Agency Name: CITY OF AUBURN NOTICE OF AD TEXT APPLICATION HEARINGICE OF may ne reviewea ar Tne Auburn vianning and Development Department at 1 East Main Street, 2nd Floor, Customer Service Center, Auburn, WA 98001. Proposal: Spe- clal Home Occupation (Land Use) Per- mit Is for a hair salon business within a single - family residence. The business will employ one resident -owner who will pro- vide hair care services by appointment only Tuesday through Saturday, between the hours of loam and 6pm, The business will occupy approximately 90SF of the homes floor area (5.6% of 1,608SF), The business will occupy no more than 114 of the dwelling's floor area. Location: The APPI[Catl0n: N/A Omer Fermlrs, Flans and Approvals To Be Prepared: City of Auburn Business License, Statement of Consistency and List of Applicable De- velopment Regulations: This proposal is subject to and shall be consistent with the Auburn City Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Public Works Design and Construc- tlan Standards. Public Comment Perlod: All persons may comment on this appli- cation. Comments must be in writing and received by the end of the 15 -day comment period at 5:00 pm on August 20 2014 to the mailing address of 25 West gain Street, Auburn, WA, 98001 -4998 or at the hearing, Any person wishing to become a party of record, shall Include in their comments that they wish to receive notice of any hearings, If relevant; request a copy of decisions once made; and be made aware of appeal rights. For questions regarding this project, please contact David Jones, Senior Plan- ner at dllones11auburnwa goy oY (253) 804.5031. Pu c eUlf —A axing:, Hearing Examiner will conduct a public hearing on the Special Home Occupation Permit at City Hall Council Chambers, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, Washington 98001 on Fri- day, August 20, 2014 at 5:30pm. Exhibit 6 CITY OF ^ WASHINGTON Application Number: MIS14-0007 Applicant/Agent: EhnR8ib0on Level Headed Hair Design 5014 Bennett Ave SE Auburn, VVA98O82 Location: The proposal iS located sd5O14 Bennett Avenue 8E' Auburn, WA 98092, within the 8W 1/4 of Section 32-21-05.P(iDg County Assessor P8rCB| NU. 7299600140. Closing Date for Public Comments: August 20, 2014 | certify that | did send n Notice of Application for the above referenced applications, as re46ired by Auburn City Code 14.07' to all property owners located within 300 feet of the affected site. Said Notice was mailed pre-paid stamped through the United States Postal Service at least 15 days prior to the closing date for public comments noted above. | declare under penalty Of perjury of the |8vvs of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. ....... .. . . Tina Kriss 7-"'Plannihg and Development Secretary Exhibit 7 CITY OF *r B V R WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING OF LEGAL NOTICE BY APPLICANT APPLICATION NUMBER: MIS14 -0007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Special Home Occupation (Land Use) Permit is for a hair salon business within a single - family residence. The business will employ one resident -owner who will provide hair care services by appointment only, Tuesday through Saturday, between the hours of 10am and 6pm. The business will occupy approximately 90SF of the homes floor area (5.6% of 1,608SF). The business will occupy no more than' /4 of the dwelling's floor area. LOCATION: The proposal is located at 5614 Bennett Avenue SE, Auburn, WA 98092, within the SW' /4 of Section 32- 21 -05. PARCEL NUMBER: 7299600140 Closing Date for Public Comments: 5:00 pm, August 20, 2014 certify that on �' , U I did erect a land use posting board at the location above, which included a Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing for the above referenced application, as required by Auburn City Code 1.27 and 14.07.030. The board was erected at least 15 days prior to the closing date for public comments noted above. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. f J Lk( Name (please print or type) Date Signature NOTE This affidavit must be returned to the Planning and Development Department at least one week prior to the closing date for public comments or review of the application may be postponed. CASE NUMBER: L-. Yr0 (-? 5% OFFICER: JJI n11 DATE ISSUED: REQUEST FOR APPEAL BEFORE THE CITY OF AUBURN HEARING EXAMINER Owner /Keeper of dog: Last Name: I i sl -Lg,c First: M1. DOB: 1-2-- l lam- I q a (1So 4z) Address:-17--IS b7r K*,E City: I9,Ab%)fn State: Zip: '2800-2- "° " "'c 2531833 -7921 Home Phone: Z5 Z - i o Phone: 1, request a hearing to contest my dog(s), (0 ner /Keeper Signature) ac��ff� being declared a: i ° r! (Dog's Name) <<f /Cc- .4 Potentially Dangerous Dog ❑ Dangerous Dog This completed form must be delivered in person or by certified mail by the owner /keeper to the Auburn City Clerk to request a hearing. Auburn City Clerk 25 W Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 876 -1997 Mon - Fri: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm CITY OF # T TB � Nancy Backus, Mayor �J WASHINGTON T J�T GT�I 25 West Main Street * Auburn WA 98001 -4998 * www.auburnwa.gov * 253- 931 -3000 August 4, 2014 DELIVERED BY CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS US MAIL Appellant: Athena Fisher 1215 O St NE Auburn WA 98002 CITY OF AUBURN NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Auburn Hearing Examiner will conduct a hearing on the appeal by Athena Fisher on the City of Auburn's designation of the dog known as "Kodak" as a potentially dangerous dog. The dog known as "Kodak" is described as a female Siberian Husky, white and black in color. The hearing will be held Wednesday, August 20, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Auburn City Hall located at 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA, 98001. DATED AND MAILED THIS 4th DAY OF AUGUST 2014. CITY OF AUBURN Danielle Daskam, City Clerk CC: Leslie Bazaldua AUBURN* MORF THAN YOU IMAGINED CITY OF AUBURN NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Auburn Hearing Examiner will conduct a hearing on the appeal by Athena Fisher on the City of Auburn's designation of the dog known as "Kodah" as a potentially dangerous dog. The dog known as "Kodah" is described as a female Siberian Husky, white and black in color. The hearing will be held Wednesday, August 20, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Auburn City Hall located at 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA, 98001. Do Not Publish Below This Line Publish in The Seattle Times on August 6, 2014 CITY OF .. °' WASHINGTON REGISTRATION FORM POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS CITY OF AUBURN REGISTRATION NO: DATE OF REGISTRATION: PET OWNER INFORMATION Name: Physical Address: Mailing Address (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE): City: Auburn State: WA Zip: 9800 Z Phone No.: ",7 5 -7 10 Alternate Phone No.: PET INFORMATION Name:. i oC�/1 Age:�m, ,f V60-e- S Vrk ZZ Breed: j u Sex: or F Color: Altered: Y or N Weight: `70 ire, 4�, t Microchipped? Y o Microchip No.: ! Pet f_icense No.: Expiration Date: Has your pet completed the merican Keiiriel Club's arnne Good Citizen Progia'm (or comparable course approved by City of ?: Y NC ��c�`,r��y Auburn) or &Lroii) If yes, lease list Pro gramlCourse infor., tien below and attach a copy of Certificate of Completion: Pro M y r }•1 r° d4 i4.,4r "gti'� Tj f� Addr 4 1 r `k. ` p X. AV- 'I,�,�. P, :r'p zr'��I r,�,Y;, .�_p1' a +. "-1 +��•• 111.. '[��',` •ry 4�'� ' •� l`° � i1',�`.h F;�' h. '`I � ,F ��r -•'}•A - 1 .. i 1.1.E - , W !. S . �'' ,S. � , �' ,� •,�., -'q� ��,r�� `i1 o •i,, •�., ��,, � "'�� ; a'' fir ,:. � -ti �,� µ �} �r,. `� ��. �4,— Y� ti �•. ;' \'� 1 {N � r' �' � '`iv�f i �r 'firI e• .r �k •M'` "r,•r �,�' � •II � R •. � `� r C '�` til' �6 •�4 � ��tr � r' C •. ;• * f_I,' fi`. ' Y` � -cam: i- •h; �,rE- ?' �f,. d X. roi 01 Auburn June 11, 2014 Ms. Athena Fisher 31600124 th Ave Se #26 Auburn Wa, 98092 Ms. Fisher, On May 28, 2014 under Auburn Police case number 14- 06758, Auburn Animal Control Officer Winner investigated an allegation that your dog Kodah had bitten another dog causing puncture wounds. Concluding the investigation, Officer Winner recommended that Kodah be declared a "Potentially Dangerous Dog", as defined in Auburn City Code (ACC) 6,.01.010 (25), and on May 28`h, 2014, you were served with a Notice of Intent to declare Kodah Potentially Dangerous. According to ACO Winner's investigative report, the reporting person indicated that on May 27, 2014, they were walking their dog Chanfles with a leash. As they passed your residence, they heard some type of yelling coming from the residence and recognized that a large dog, later identified as Kodah, running in their direction. As Kodah arrived next to them, both dogs faced each other. The victim dog, Chanfles, sat down and Kodah began to growl. At that point, Kodah, using his mouth, grabbed the neck of the victim dog and began to shake. According to the Reporting Person, you ran over an attempted to stop the attack. This attack caused puncture wounds to the victim dog. During this investigation, you told Officer Winner that Kodah did bite the victim dog and you were also aware of the injuries incurred as a result of Kodah's attack. On June 11, 2014 at 10:30am, you requested a hearing in my office. You admitted to me that Kodah attacked the victim dog Chanfles and that you were aware of the injuries. You were not disputing the facts, however wanted to prevent Kodah from being registered as Potentially Dangerous. Based on the evidence in the record, and your testimony during the appeal, I find that your dog Kodah, a Siberian Husky mix, did attack and bite another domestic animal (dog) causing injuries. I find that Kodah's actions were unprovoked and occurred on the streets, sidewalks or public ground. Therefore, as the designated official for the animal control authority, I have declared your Husky Dog Kodah, as Potentially Dangerous as described in Auburn City Code 6.01.010 (A) (25). Based on this declaration, you are required to follow the restrictions outlined in Auburn City Code 6.35.030 and 6.35.035 as well as penalties associated with failure to comply. These codes are attached by reference, however can be accessed electronically at your convenience. According to Auburn City Code 6.35.010(D), you may appeal my decision to the City's Hearing Examiner within 15 days of the date of this letter, if it is delivered to you in person, or within 20 days of this letter if its was mailed to you, by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk. William T. Pierson Assistant Chief of Police RECEIVED 06!1812014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /1$ /2014/WED 12:26 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 P,001 Auburn Police Department Police Report for Incident 14 -06758 06/18/14 12:13:08 565 Crime: ANPR ANIMAL PROELPM Location: 3-409 Received By: 0 Winner Responding Officers- CrWinner Responsible Officer: I Thornton When Reported: 09:57:46 05/28/14 Crimes Additional Offense: Animal Problem Circumstances LTN43 Open Area Public Address: 31600 124TH AVE SE Auburn WA 48092 How Received: V Valley Comm Agency: APD Disposition: To Pros Attorney for Review 05/30/14 Occurred Between: 17:00 :00 45/27/14 and 17;30:00 05/27114 Clearance: CRO Cleared, Responding Officer Judicial Status: Misc Entry: DB Modus Operandi: Involvements Description : Method Date T Type D RECEIVED 06/18/2014 00:21 2536043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN/18/2014/WED 12:26 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No.2539315108 P.002 Police Report for Incident 14 -08758 Page 2 of 5 Involved Persons: OTHER: ROCHELLE Last: FISHER DOB: 12/161$1 Race: U Belot: 5'03" k1kir: BLU First: ATHENA br Lit: FISREAR199RW Sex: F Phooe: (253)833 -7929 Weight: 130 Eyes: BLN Mid: ROCHELLE Address: 31600126TH AVE SE; 25 City: Aubwn, WA 98092 SSN: M Work Phone: (253)217 -9710 Address: CELL CbMPLAWANT : Last: BAZALDUA first: LESLIE M1d: M DO$: 09/18/90 Dr Lie: Address: 31600'1 24M AVE SE; #26 Race: H Sea: F Phone: () - City: Auburn, WA 98092 Height: 'Weight: 0 SSN: - - Hair: Eyes: Work Phone: (206)432 -7041 CELL RECEIVED 06/1812014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JV18MA/M I M7 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No. 253931510$ P. 003 Poffce Report for Indident 14 -06756 Narrative p WINNER 09545, 105A NV, Fri May 30 10 ;15 ;34 ROT 2014 A dog bite to a neighbor's dog was reported. The offending was contained at the owner's residence, and the dog was declared Potentially Dangerous.* On 05 -20 -14 I responded to a complaint of a dog bite on another dog in College Place Mobile home Park, 31600 124th Ave 3E in Auburn, King, WA. The complaint indicated it was called in by the complex management, but the victim dog resided in unit 426, grid the offending dog resided in #25. Upon my arrival I contacted unit #26, while knocking at the door a vehicle with one male and one female Hiepanic occupant pulled into the multiple spot parking area just in front of this unit. I contacted them ana confirmed that they lived at #26 and the female, identified as Leslie M. Bazaldua, was in fact the victim dog owner and witness to the incident. Bazaldua provided me a signed written statement on the events that occurred the night prior, 05 -27 -14 around 1720 Firs, when her dog was attacked by the neighbor's dog. Fa2aldua said she had been walking her dog, on leash, in the parking lot, approximately six parking spots wide, in front of her residence. Ba2aldua had mat her sister at this location and they heard the neighbor from unit 025 yelling at her kids_ Bazaldua looked over and saw the neighbor's husky then running over, straight for her and her dog. Bazaldua said the dogs stopped, facing each other, her dog sat down and the Rusky was growling. The Husky then grabbed Bazaldua'a dog, "Chanfles ", by the neck and started shaking him. The owner was running over during this attack and tackled her dog. Bazaldua said they latex found swelling and two punctures on Chanfles' neck, one of which she took a photo of. At this time I was unable to see the punctures on Chanfles neck. Bazaldua then left to take her dog no the vet. I asked her to notify me if they located any Eurther injuries. Sa2aldua later e- mailed me four photos showing the two punctures on Chanfles' neck. I then contacted Athena B. Fisher at uixit #26 1 know Fisher from previous experience involving her dog, Kodah, a large Siberian Husky mix_ Kodah barked at me on entering the property, but he would not come near me. Pisher acknowledge that she was aware of why I was here, indicating the previous day's dog fight. Fishez looked Over and signed a Constitutional Right waiver Form, which will be included in the case jacket. Fisher then provided me a signed written statement on the incident. Fisher said she had been yelling at her children, and had come out of their fenced yard, failing to latch the gate. Fisher said Kodah ran straight out of the gate, towards the neighbor and her dog, and she ran after him. Fisher admitted that Kodah did bite the other dog, and the owners' later found some wounds on their dog. Both parties remained amicable while I was on scene. Fisher amid she had apologized directly after the incident. Neither Fisher nor Bazaldua had their doge licensed, though both dogs had current rabies vaccines. Fisher had been warned previously about licensing, as well as allowing hei dog to run loose. There had been one previous call within the past year involving Kodah running after and nipping at another dog, but the complainant was unwilling to provide a statement on that incident. I Completed two copies of the Potentially Dangerous Dog declaration form, providing one to Fisher and including one in the case jacket. I advised Fisher that she would be receiving infractions on the matter, and they wbilld arrive in the mail. Bazaldua, likewise, had been advised that she would be receiving an in f raction for licensing, and since she was taking her dog to the vet, that infraction Would arrive in the mail, as well. I issued Ba2aldua one infraction for AMC 6.04.010 (Failure to Lieen0a) for today's date and time. I also issued Fisher three infractions for AMC 6.04.010 (Failure to License), AM.0 6.02.010(A).l (Animal At-Large), and AMC 6.02.040.1 Page 3 of 5 RECEIVED 06/10/2014 00:21 2630043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /16/2014/WED 12;27 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX k2539315106 P.004 Police Report for Incident 14 -06758 (Dog off leash). This matter will be forwarded to the prosecutor for poaaible filing of charges for AMC 6.02.090 (Animal Injuring Humane /Animal). I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PER URY UNDER THE LAWS OF TFE STATE OF WASHIN=bN THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE AND TRAT I AM Z=RING MY AUTHORIZED USER xA AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. Signature:George D Winner #:9505 Date and place ;05 -30 -14 City /Town of Auburn, County of King Page 4 of 5 RECEIVED 06/18/2014 60:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS 0 /18 /2CHAED 12:28 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 P.005 Police Report for Incident 14 -06758 Page 5 of 5 Supplement Sequence: 1 G WINNER #4505, 105A NV, Wed Jun 11 14:53:23 PDT 2014 On 06- 11 -14, as requested by Assistant Chief Pierson of the APD, I arrived at 31600 124th Ave SE #26 with papsrwark to serve for Athena Fisher regarding a Potentially Dangerous Dog issue. On my arrival I contacted Fisher and her her sign Por receipt of a copy of AC Pierson's determination letter. This concluded my involvement. I CERTIFY CINDER PENALTY OF PERJMY UNDER THE LAW$ OF ME STATE OF WrASAINGTON THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARS TRUE AND,ACCURATE AND THAT I AM ENTERING MY A=ORZZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO ADTHENTICATE IT. Signature :George D Winner #:9505 Date and Place:05 -11 -14 City /Town of Auburn, County of Xing INFRACTION- INF f RESPONSE Z DISPOSITTON T: QTRAFFIC 'ONUN- TRAFFIC LE4: WA0170400 COURTORI #: WA017173J INFStACTIDNN: 420403148 REPDRTC 14 -06758 SUB -TOTAL M THE Z DISTRICT E)MUNICIPAL' COURT OF KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ~ I F�STATEOFWAZHINGTON [:)COUNTYOF QCfTYITOWNOF AUBURN PLAINTIFF VS_ NAMED DEFENDANT Z $ 2 2 4t NC THE UNDERSIGNED GERTIFI ES AND SAYS THAT IN THE STATE OF WAS INGTO NC D P DRNER`5LfGENSEfiIO STATE f %P1RES PHOTDI.D.�Id�ATCHED i NAME: LAST FIRST MIDDLE SF)f� CDL .41 N WA 12 -i6 -18 YES FISHER ATEHl�LA R YES ©NO 'S F� 99RW E] NO C ADDRESS- 31600 124T AVE SE #�5 NC ,i IF NEWADDRESS CITY U P STATE ZIP CODE is s $ TOTAL COSTS PASSENGER AUBURN 5 1hIA 198092 A m EMPLOYER D P DF r- EMPLOYER LOCATION $ J S o DATE OF WIRTH RACE E74 HEIGHT WEIGHT EYES HAIR RESIDENTIAL PHONENO. CEWPAGERPHONENO. WORK PHONE NO. ® -0 12 -16 -81 W F 5'03" 123 SLU BLN (2631217 -8710 °u— Z VIOLATION DATE INTERPRETERNEEDFD AT LCCATION THI AYE SE M.P. CITYICOUNTYOF ON OR ABOUT O5f2T/201417:20 LANG REF,TR4FFICWAY BLOCKiI 81600 AUSURNIKING I� DID OPERATE THE FOLLOWTNO VEHICLMA TOR VEHICLE ON A PUBLIC HIGHWAYAND VEH LIC NO STATE EXPIRES VEH YR MAKE MODEL STYLE GOLOR �_ w� TR tl LIC NO STATE EXPIRES TR YR TR 42 LIC NO STATE EXPIRES TR YR CWNEMOMPANY IF OTHER THAN DREVER is ADDRESS CITY STATE JPCO06 sue+ ACCIDENT COMMERCIA YES I6+ YES HAZMA YES ExElo", FIRE sm VEHICLE NO PASS NO NO VEHICLE LEA s DID THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACil OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSES VEH SPEED INA _ ZONE SMQ PACE AIRCRAFT 1, VIOLATIOMSTATUTE CODE AMC6.02.010.A I ANIMAL LARGE 55T OFFENSE PENALTY 3 550.00 w� 2. VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODs: AMC6.02.040.1 DOG OFF -LEASH IST OFFENSE PENALTYS 50.00 3. VIOLAT30NMTATUTE CODE AMC6,04.010 FAILURETO LICENSE DOG OR CA PENALTY S 50,00 4_ VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODE PENALTY 4 S_ VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODE JPENALTY$ FITICKET SE RUED ON VIOLATOR I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WPSHINGTON THAT I HAVE ISSUED THIS ON THE DATE AND AT THE LOCATION ABOVE, THAT I HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEUEVE ,F iICFO =T SENT T4 COURT FOR MAI LING THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON COMMMED THE ABOVE OFFENSE {S}, ANO I AM ENTERING MY AUTHORIZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. OTICIET REFERREDTO PROSECUTOR OFFICER G WINNER it 950$ OFFICER iv INF f RESPONSE DISPOSITTON PENALTY SUSPENDED SUB -TOTAL FINDINGIJUDGMIENT DATE '~ ~ I C VC G NG D P DF 5 $ 2 2 G NC G NC D P DF S S $ AB$TRACTULD TO OLYMPIA C INC G NC D P OF 'S 5 a a 3. VIOLAT30NMTATUTE CODE AMC6,04.010 FAILURETO LICENSE DOG OR CA PENALTY S 50,00 4_ VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODE PENALTY 4 S_ VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODE JPENALTY$ FITICKET SE RUED ON VIOLATOR I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WPSHINGTON THAT I HAVE ISSUED THIS ON THE DATE AND AT THE LOCATION ABOVE, THAT I HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEUEVE ,F iICFO =T SENT T4 COURT FOR MAI LING THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON COMMMED THE ABOVE OFFENSE {S}, ANO I AM ENTERING MY AUTHORIZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. OTICIET REFERREDTO PROSECUTOR OFFICER G WINNER it 950$ OFFICER iv PAGE I OF 4 -T fIa Tn m D N s m INF f RESPONSE DISPOSITTON PENALTY SUSPENDED SUB -TOTAL FINDINGIJUDGMIENT DATE '~ ~ I C VC G NG D P DF 5 $ 2 2 G NC G NC D P DF S S $ AB$TRACTULD TO OLYMPIA C INC G NC D P OF 'S 5 a a 4 C NC C NC U P OF . $ S $ TOTAL COSTS 5 C NC G INC D P DF $r S $ J S PAGE I OF 4 -T fIa Tn m D N s m OFFICER REPORT 420403148 VIOLATI0IGOATE z ON GR ABOUT: SF27/00I4 3:24W FN ti7' �r G WIN N ER #9505,105A NV, Fri May 3410:15.34 PDT 2014 A dog bite to a neighbor's dog was reported. The offending was-contained at the owner's residence, and the dog was declared: Potentially Dangerous..% On 05 -28 -141 responded to a complaint of a dog bite on another clog in College Place Mobile Home Park, 31500 124th Ave 5E in Auburn, King, WA. The complaint indicated it was called in by the complex management, but the victim dog resided in unit #26, and the offending dog resided in #25. Upon my arrival 1 contacted unit #26, while knocking at the door a vehicle with one male and one female Hispanic occupant pulled into the rnultlple spot parking area just in front of this unit. I contacted them and confirmed that they lived, at #26 and the female, idea- ified as Leslie M. Bazaldua, was in fact the victim dog,owner and witness to the incident. Bazaldua provided me a signed written statement on the events that occurred the night -prior, 05 -27 -14 around 1720 Hrs, when her dog was attacked by the neighbors dog. Bazaldua said she had been walking her dog, on leash, in the parking Jot,- approximately,six parking spots wide, in front of her residence. Bazaldua had met her sister at this location and they heard the neighbor from unit #25 yelling at her kids. Bazaldua looked over and saw the:neighbor's.husky then running over, straight for herand her dog. Bazaldua said the dogs stopped, facing each other, her dog sat down and the Husky was growling. The Husky then grabbed Bazaldua's dog, "Chanfles", by the [i 1 z 0 CD CD — D C e� tM4 z d Q EMM - .91ARRATIVJ: C0N17NUPS GN N0(r PA GP... TRAFFIC IVYEATHER STREET IL1314T WITNESS NAME 4A.ST. FIRST, M_I.j BAZALDUA LESLIE M PHONE 2064327041 WITNESS NAME [LAST, FIRST. M. L) PHONE ADDRESS 31600 124TH AVE SE #26 CITY AUBURN STATE WA ZIP 88093 ADDRESS CITY STATE IP MNESS NAME BLAST, FIRST, M.I.] PHONE WITNESS NAME [LAST, FIRST, M.L) PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE LP ADDRESS OITY STATE IP WITNESS NAME (LAST. F1RS7, M.1.1 PHONE WITNESS NAME [LAST, FIRST, M,I.) PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP ADDRESS CITY STATE IA 1MTNESS NAME (LAST, FIRST, M.I.) PHONE VVITNESS WAME [LAST, FIRST, M_I,) PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZJP ADDRESS CITY STATE fY PAGE 2 aF 4 -n CA 2 M n M S Z A7 OD s �—r EPOR7CONTINUED... 4X.0403148 VIOLATION DATE � ON OR ABOUT: 5l77/70f4 5.r/o:00 PM neck and started shaking him. The owner was'running over during this attack and tackled her dog. Bazaldua said they later found! swelling, and two punctures on the Chanfles' neck, one of which she took a photo of. At this time I was: unable to see the punctures on Chanfles neck. Bazaldua then left to take her dog to the vet. I asked her to notify me 'rf they located any further injuries. Bazaldua later e- mailed me four photos showing the two puncture on Chanfles' neck. I.then contacted Athena R. Fisher at unit #261 know Fisher from previous experience involving her dog, Kodah, a large Siberian Husky mix. Kodah barked at me on entering the property, but he would not come near me. Fisher acknowledge that she was aware of why I was Mere, indicating the previous day's dog fight. Fisher looked over and signed a Constitutional Right Waiver Form, which will be included in the case jacket. Fisher then provided me a signed written statement on the incident. Fisher said-she had been yelling at her children, and had come out of their fenced yard; failing to latch the gate. Fisher said Kodah ran straight out of the gate, towards the neighbor and her dog, and she ran after him. Fisher admitted that Kodah did bite the other dog, and the owners' later found some wounds on-their dog. Both parties remained amicable while'I was on scene. Fisher said she had apologized directly after the incident. Neither Fisher nor Bazaldua had their dogs-licensed, though both dogs had current rabies vaccines. Fisher had been warned previously about licensing, as well as allowing her dog to nun loose. There had been one previous call within the past year involving Kodah running after and nipping at another dog, but the complainant was:unwilling to provide a statement on that incident. I oompleted two copies of the Potentially Dangerous Dog declaration form, providing one to Fisher-and1nduding one in the case jacket. I advised Fisher that she would be receiving Infractions on the matter, and they would arrive in the mail. Bazaldua,-likewise, had been advised that she would be reoeiving an infraction for licensing, and since she was taking her dog to the vet, that infraction would arrive in the mail, as well. I issued Bazaldua one1nfraction for AMC 6.04.010 (Failure to License) for today's date and time. I also issued Fisher three infractions for AMC 6.04.010 (Failure to License), AMC 6.02.010(A).1 (Animal At- Large), and.AMC 6.02.040.1 _.NARRAnVECONnNUES ONN"rPAGE . PAGE 3 OF 4 Z c� 0 Z N 0 0 03 n C W� TI x M n M x _N 4] CG J OFFICER REPORT CONTINUED... (Dog off leash). 4ZO4034 6 This matter will be forwarded to the prosecutor for possible filing of charges for AMC 6.02.090 (Animal' Injuring. HumanefAnimal). VIOLATION DATE QNDRABOUT. Sr2702014519:00PM CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER'THE LAWS OF-THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE AND THAT I AM ENTERING-MY AUTHORIZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. Signature:George D Winner #,5505 Date and Plaee:05 -30 -14 City/Town of Auburn, County of King Officer's Report for Citation /Notice of infraction # 4Z0403148. The information contained in and attached to this citation /notice of infraction is incorporated by reference Into this report. CERTIFY UNDER - PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE AND THAT I AM ENTERING MY AUTHORIZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. Signature: G WINNER #: 9505 Date and Place: 513012014 City/Town of Auburn, County of KING PAGE 4 OF 4 z T n 4 0 z 0 0 W a D C v md rn n rn .z D x s N s Q1 s INFRAcnON T [-]TRAFFIC ©NON - TRAFFIC LEA; WA0170100 couRToRtI~ WA017173J INFRACTION:`: 420403144 REPORT a: 14.06758 g Cl IWTHE ©DISTRICT E] MUNICIPAL COURT OF KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT =1 ❑STATE OF WASM14GTON [j COUNTY DF J❑CRY/TowN OF AUBURN PLAINTIFF VS. NAMED DEFENDANT z T?iE UNDCRSIGHMPERTIF1 ES AND SAYS THAT IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON A DRIVER'S LICENSE NO. STATE jEXPi RES JPHOTO I,D. MATCHED NAME: LAST FIRST MIDDLE SFX CDL IWA 09 -18-14 YES QNO BAZALDUA LESLIE M DrESDNO BA LLMI040 F 503" 120 13RO BLK ADDRESS 3 6001247 "ESE #26 IF NEWAODRESS CITY V10LATION DATE INTERPRETER NEEDED STATE ZIP CODE CTTYICOUNTY OF HPASS5NG-ER AUBURN 31600 IWA l9aQ192 N O b co i A A EMPLOYER EMPLOYERLOCATION DATE OF BIRTH SEX HEIGHT VIEIGHT EYES HAIR RESWENTUkL PHONE NO_ CELLIPAGER PHONE NO_ WORK PHONE NO, 16 -Sfl F 503" 120 13RO BLK (206)432 -7049 E Z V10LATION DATE INTERPRETER NEEDED AT LOCATION I Z4TH AVE SE IILP. S CTTYICOUNTY OF ON OR ABOUT OW2E120140S:67 IANG REF.TRAFFICWAY 131OCK6 31600 I AUSURNIMNG DID OPERATE THE FOLLOWING VEHICLE SOITOR VEHICLE ON A PUBLIC HtGHWAY AND .� VEH LIC NO STATE EXPIRES VEH YR MAKE MODEL STYLE COLOR S $ ABSTRACT HELD TO OLYMPIA C3 Q 00 3 TROILICNO STATE EXPIRES TRYR TRd2LICNO STATE EXPIRES TRYR C"SPICOMPANYIF OTHER THAN DRIVER ADDRESS CITY STATE IIP CODE ACCIDENT COMMERCIAL YES 15+ YES HAZMAT YES EXEMPT FIRE IVEHICLE NO PASS NO C MC NO VEHICLE LEA Ire Is DID THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSES VEH SPEED INA ZONE SMp 1 IPACE I JAIRCRAFT Wan 1. VIOLATIONISTATUTE CODE A 06.04,010 FAELLIKE TO LICENSE DOG OR CAT 1PENALTY3 50.06 E� 0 2, VIOLATIOWSTATUTE CODE JPENALTYS 3. VIOLATKINISTATUTECODE JPENALTYS 4.VIOLATK WSTATUTE CODE JPENALrys S. VIOLATIOWSTATUTE CODE TICKET 5ERVEI] ON VIOLATOR I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PER -URY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MSHLNDTON THAT 1 HAVE ❑ SSUED THIS ON THE DATE ARID AT THE LOCATION ABOVE, 7KAT I HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELI EVE THI -ABOVE NAMED PERSON COMMITTED THE ABOVE OFFENSE(SX AND I AM ENTERING MYAUT14ORV-ED QTICKET SENT TO COURT FOR MAILI NG USER IDAND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE IT. OFFICER G ❑TICKET REFERRED TO PROSECUTOR OFFICER W4NNER 9 SSOS PAGE 1 OF 3 r a c n r m r m 0 CD 0 Fes: INF # RESPONSE DISPOSITION PENALTY SUSPENDED SUES TOTAL FINDINetiUDGMENT DATE p u z f G NC C NC ❑ P DF S S $ N 2 C NC C NC 0 P DF $ S $ ABSTRACT HELD TO OLYMPIA C3 Q 00 3 G NC C NC D P DF $ S 3: u 4 4 C NC C NC D P OF $ S S TOTAL COSTS S 5 C MC C NC D P DF $ Is Is PAGE 1 OF 3 r a c n r m r m 0 CD 0 Fes: OFFICER REPORT 4ZO403144 G WINNER #9505 105A NV 05 -28 -14 1046 HRS VIOLATION DATE ON QR ABQITT. 51Z#1M4 "7.60 A31 On 5 -28 -14 1 contacted Leslie M. Bazaldua,at her residence regarding a complaint of her dog � being iattacked by the neighbor's dog. Bazaldua did not have her dog licensed, and was unsure of how to do so. I advised Bazaldua on how to license -her dog, a red, male, Min Pin, "Chanfles ". I issued Bazaldua one infraction for AMC 6.04.0iD (Failure to License). While investigating the animal attack Bazaldua advised she wished to take her dog to the vet, ['Informed her that her infraction would arrive In the mail. # **AAi. *!i!#M*e * ►K * # *}tt**4 RFl ► *tip Mt* Officei's Report for Citation /Notice of Infraction # 4Z0403144. The information contained in and attached to this citationtnotioe of infraction is incorporated by reference into this report. CERTIFY UNDER-PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE AND THAT I AM ENTERING MY AUTHORIZED USER ID AND PASSWORD TO AUTHENTICATE 1T. Signature: G WINNER #: 9505 Date and Place; 512812014 City/Town of Aubum, County of KING — MARRAFTVE CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE... TRAFFIC IWEATHER ISTRM JUGHT WITNESS NAME [LAST, FIRST, MJ.) PHONE WITNESS NAME {LAST, FIRST, M. 1.) PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE rP ADDRESS CITY STATE IP VNTNESS NAME (LAST. FIRST, MJ.) PHONE WITNESS NAME (LAST, FIRST. M.I.) PHONE ADDRESS CITY TATE LP ADDRESS 1TY STATE IP WITNESS NAME {LAST, FIRST, M111 PHONE VATNESS NAME (LAST, FIRST, M-L) PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP ADDRESS CITY TATE ZIP WITNESS NAME iLAST, FIRST. M-1.j PHONE VATNESS NAME (LAST, FIRST, M I_) PHONE ADDRESS CITY ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP z n 0 z N A 0 w C � Z 0 s= M r 4 C a M r M 9 O t0 co PAGE 2OF3 8 RECEIVED 06118/2014 00:21 2538043116 M/18/2014/WU 12:32 A Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 INFRACTION # 4ZO403144 AUP IN 6 e ti h a L 04 z gz 40 7 M 8 M� 9 n m z z F n a ui d w U ti LL 0 AUBURN CITY CLERKS P. 012 BAZALDLIA, LESLIE M 091890 t" u- 0 0 Lu 0 d RECEIVED 06/18/2014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS 0 /18 /201YWED 12,3.3 PM Auburn Police Dept , FAX No.2539315108 P.013 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT Case STATEMENT ❑ SUSPECT ❑ VICTIM #WMESS Number: y�� 7 Date: , 1q. Time/Hours: Place: ILAA /w A Statement of: j �r �- / 2-,4/- J)C4, F . Taken by :.. - )Ilv"JAK , 'X-q.505 Date of Birth: Age; Alias: Address: 31 & 00 l a ( '-" AvF- 5 C 4'& Work Prone #: Home Phone #: • Cell Phone #: .cam) II32 - %y/ I certify under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of Washington, that the above statement is true and correct. Statement, B (01 /09) Page J-- of �"� •I)� C� ' F W 1, KE-� 11Jc r 6i r cow-, ! /"ti i.� Ol.i %J1 tJ /:% I.fTGr7�- !.t•if}, 6-)ff r LMt LA—1 a- A-e—�7D Ga�APL C- ANUS _ 22L VIP n1 fi L✓ 4Nr 7V /art- 1--- "W i 2V-C x..V n�-� SKY C659,Q FLC. 5 IM< 13✓0 ;7c,�,.rC_ R. S eO.0 I certify under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of Washington, that the above statement is true and correct. Statement, B (01 /09) Page J-- of RECEIVED 06/1B/2014 00 :21 2538043126 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN/18/2014/WED 12:33 PM Auburn Police Dept PAX No.2539315108 P.014 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT Case EXPLANATION/WAIVER OF RIGHTS Number: 7-S& Date: Z Time/Hou(r -s' � Place: „Qt,&Agd . IS I'VA _ Statement of: A V `- EXPLANATION/WAI'V'ER OF MAY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Before questioning and the making of an statement, I, , �P.�0._ I`" \f� have been advised by . n. �– ,�_ � 9-0 of the following rights: I have the right to remain silent; 2. Anything I say can be used against me in a court of law. If I am under the age of 18, anything I say can be used against me in a juvenile court prosecution for a juvenile offense and can also be used against me in an adult court criminal prosecution if I am to be tried as an adult_ I have the right at this time to talk to a lawyer and have him/her present with me while I am being questioned. 4. If I cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent me before any questioning, if I wish. I can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements. Signature: 99 I have read or had read to me the above explanation of my Constitutional rights, and I understand them. I have decided not to exercise these rights at this time. I wish to make a statement now. The statement is made by me freely and voluntarily and without threats or promises of any kind. Signature: Witnesses: Explanation of Rights- Statement, A (01109) Page — of.— RECEIVED 06110/2014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /18 /2014/WED 12:34 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No- 2539315108 P.015 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT Case lei STATEMENT ❑ SUSPECT ❑ 'VICTIM WITNESS Number: 1 7 7 � Date: p $ TimeJI ours: 092 ? place: 4 1491 t,eAl Statement of: Taken by: r✓,v Date ofBirth: Age: 32) Alias: Address: 4'��;� r,n Jr) 4-7v rqrjC S - 25 .- Work Phone #: , Home Phone #: Cell Phone 1 Am,-, ' I r X certify under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of Washington, that the above statement is true and correct. Statement, B (01/09) Page of .. Lek a ti" r� t ' t s _ n i w Rol G / L _ -4 tl r r 1 (, fi4 �lr� i rI`,,•� '!, - - w d' r { - - - -, F,' �r +' �r -•ref � f r rr A�.� x• , ! r? r A + ! y r `4^•� /fir �yJrt + � y f � 4 `r r . + e z i Cr, :� ,r'. . f r it +_•. 1 J ; �. r, ! J f F.Y'� r _ i J e -ir. r 1 1, r , r - 1 ! ,,c� �1 F rJ F j — f :. , 1 f r - • ` ,�. �t t - !. r .. +' F - – . - r r — I �. J,. - . rS -• . ' - -! ! — 1 1. - - - - - - - .. . - - - - - - - - ,; - - .. _. - . .. - - . -' . _ _ . . . . .. .. . - S. -: - - _ - _ �. .- ._. _ __ _ _- .. _ - ._ r C } r 5 " 4 - - _ - 1C i r _, r }. r r E Fah, _ f''r {r/ y L _ - + r s ' 'L �T- jig r _ I f r t i if ifl' f'� fir'f �' e5 _. r. Jr i� C• 4 L r y� / r r r T_ :h. . r+ y r Ij r t, J 1 1, l- 5j , f f ti- y f+ r 1. L _ !c 4 1 �r-+ -r / r:, :i 5 5 115 r' ... 1 r 1 f N f 5 - .. , .) 5 5 .f.. - f. + #. Y. r ( t' r f . I , ry F + r l 1 .. 1 - � . . _ . - 1.,1 `I . ' . . / - - ' r: .. ':' - . . •;1' fi ti N. M � - x r RECEIVED 0611612014 00:21 2536043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /18/2014/WED 12,41 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No.2539315108 P.018 CASE NUMBER: OFFICER. DATE ISSUED: 05 L,� 1 q AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO DECLARE A DOG AS DANGEROUS �_ POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ENCLOSED: PACKET COVER SHEET (PAGE 1) REASON FOR DECLARATION (PAGE 2) HEARING NOTIFICATION FORM (PAGE 3) APPEAL REQUEST FORM (PAGE 4) ANIMAL REQUIREMENTS (PAGE 5) Owner / Deeper of Dug: Last Name: @Sair-k First: £r114- M1: DOE: f2 91 f Address: ,31! 2M 1!240 AUe, SiC 4AS City: 6:16k J --State.- 4tA Zip: 4' Home Phone: �?-�, , 11 - �? Work phone; Description of Dog; Name: jean RA- Breed(s): .5&CAiAw Color(s): 6U Markings: Sex: 6117 Altered: Y/8? Age: Microchip / Tattoo: License year and number: A�,o - --5isr ft44&AfW Rabies Vaccination Exp. Datev-4"G -14> Iq 0iW"NC- 70L*ri Veterinarian Name: G[4,,, )c. APe-&i7eterinarian Phone:��S� . /S2,o Whereabouts of dog if not at owner /keeper's residence: RECEIVED 06118/2014 00:21 2536043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /18 /20IA/WED 12:42 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX Rio,2539315108 P.019 CASE NUMBER: �y�Sg OFFICER: 1�'JI.LI J 6 DATE ISSUED: AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISION TYPE AND BASIS OF DECLARATION & REASONING Auburn Animal Control is seeking to declare your dog: 0 Dangerous Potentially Dangerous At approximately r? hrs. on the 2,71' day of 20_L,'L. Animal Control has witnessed or been provided evidence that your animal wA-5 R_t ,tee,, A Laos.- . &-Q aT1 2i- ACSk&Uw^ !d 7w., fLA-te-Ty-&cs. ��* �x* ��****** w��*»****«** �** a** ��►*, x�*** ��* �***** w�k�k��M�* �* �******* ��** �wwr+ kw * * *� * *��w * * * *� *r *� *�: :r�xc�r* Narrative: u+LZlr` D Ob tiv'CL A L/L5CO -111A-1- 'fib Al l 's WO 12 P17j C( ^T, or-r- Lj-.9t tt RNQ ATf -RUc O 7 °� . 714 c yt fw, HA D _ :FW15 Tv,4--CaVkC,-.9 AN 146, T1" � G AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED 0611612814 00:21 2538_ 043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /1$/2014 /WED 12:42 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 P,920 CASE NUMBER: l; OFFICER:1"1�` ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISION DATE ISSUED: "?-! /'y RIGHTS UPON NOTIFICATION OF PRELIMINARY DECISION Under ACC 6.35.020(C) you have a right to meet with the Chief of Police or his designee to present any reasons, orally or in writing, why the animal should not be declared Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous: If you are unable to attend this meeting you can request the meeting be rescheduled to a reasonable time that falls within 10 calendar days of delivery of this notice. If your fail to appear for this meeting preliminary notice will become final, and your animal(5) will be declared Dangerous or potentially Dangerous. If, after the meeting date, your animal Is declared Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous you may appeal that final declaration using the form provided on the following page. This form. must be submitted to the City Clerk by certified mail or in person within fifteen (15) days of the determination of your animal's status if the original notification was delivered to you in person, or within twenty (20) days if the original notification was mailed to you. REQUEST FOR MEETING ON PRELIMINARY DECLARATION I request a meeting as provided for in ACC 6.35,020(Q to discuss the preliminary decision to declare riiy animal(s) as Dangerous or potentially Dangerous in Case(s) No. 7 ct "061 1 understand that I have the right to present reasons or information in writing or verbally as to why my animal(s) should not be declared Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous, Signature Printed Name /Date Auburn Police Department 340 P. Main St Ste, 201. Auburn, WA 98002 -5548 Phone: 253 -931 -3080 RECEIVED 06/1B/2014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /18/2014/WED 12:43 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 P,021 CASE NUMBER: �51 OFFICER: l..j Vn tr1 DATE ISSUED: S REQUEST FOR APPEAL BEFORE THE CITY OF AUBURN HEARING EXAMINER Owner /Keeper of dog: Last Name: First: Address: City: Home Phone: Work Phone: MI: State: DOB: Zip:_ request a hearing to contest my dog (s], (Owner /Keeper Signature) KOD4t being declared a: (Dog's Name) yPotentially Dangerous Dog ❑ Dangerous Dog This completed form must be delivered in person or by certified mail bar the owner /keeper to the Auburn City Clerk to request a hearing. Auburn City Clerk 25 W Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 676 -1997 Mon - Fri; 8:04 am to 5:00 pm RECEIVED 06/1812014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN/18/2014/WED 12,43 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315108 P,022 CASE NUMBER: OFFICER: % [,►JVCPL DATE ISSUED: -5 DANGEROUS DOG REQUIREMENTS Within twerp (20) days of receipt of this declaration, you are required to obtain a certificate of registration a a special license for your Dangerous Dog from the Auburn City Clerk. The license will b:e issued upon mpliance with the following requirements: 1. Per ACC 6.35.0 (0(1), Placement of a "proper enclosure" on the owner's/ keeper's property to confine the dog. 2. Per ACC 6.35.020(f] ]: Placement of a conspicuously displayed sign on the premises where the dog is harbored with arning symbol that informs children or adults who cannot read of the presence of a dangerous og. 3. Per ACC 6.35.020(1•) (2): A s ety bond issued by a surety insurer qualified under chapter 48.26 R.C.W. in a sum of not less th $250,000 payment to a person injured by the dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an surer qualified under title 48 R.C.W. in an amount not less than $250,000 insuring the owner or k per for personal injuries inflicted by the dog. (OR) 4. Per ACC 6.35,020(1) (3): A policy of I bility insurance, such as homeowner's insurance, issued by an insurer qualified under R Title 48 in the amount of at least $250,000, insuring the owner for any pe onal ini cries inflicted by the dangerous dog, or such liability insurance that othe -se meets the requirements of RCW 16.08.080. 5, Per ACC 6.35.080 (A): If the Dangerous Dog i taken outside the required enclosure, such dog shall be muzzled and restrained by a substantial lea or chain and under the physical control of a person sixteen (16) years or older who is capabl of restraining such animal. b. Per ACC 6.35.020 (g), Any dog which is declared to e a "dangerous dog" pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 16.08 RCW shall also be required o be microchipped by a veterinarian of the owner's choice, at the owner's expe se. This shall be in addition to the other requirements of this chapter and in ddition to the applicable requirements for licensing as defined within this title, and is procedure must be accomplished within 30 days after the owner's receipt of the dangerous d declaration issued pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 15.08 RCW. 7. The special license fee for a Dangerous Dog is $500.00 per year, in addition to the regular license fee. RECEIVED 06118/2014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN /18 /2014AED 12:44 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No. 2539315108 P-02-3 CASE NUMBER: OFFICER: (Jiey,1 -�- DATE ISSUED: S POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG REQUIREMENTS Within twenty (20) dabs of receipt of this declaration you'are required to provide obtain a certificate of registration and a special license for your Potentially Dangerous Dog from the Auburn City Clerk. The license will be issued upon compliance with the following requirements: 1. Per ACC 6:35.030: Placement of a "proper enclosure" on the owner's / keeper's propertyto confine the dog. 2. Per ACC 6.35.030: If the Dangerous Dog is taken outside the required enclosure, such dog shall be restrained by a substantial leash or chain and under the physical control of a person sixteen (1. 6) years or older who is capable of restraining such animal. 3. Per ACC 6:35.035: The notice of potentially dangerous dog form, available from the city cleric, shall be filed. 4. Per ACC 6.35.035: The special license fee for a Potentially Dangerous Dog is $100.00, and the annual renewal fee is $100.00. RECEIVED 06/1612014 00:21 2536043116 JUN /1$ /2014/WED 12:44 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No.2539315108 CAD/Ti AUBURN CITY CLERKS F.024 Page 1 of 2 Detailed History for Police Inc ##AP140033980 As of 5/31/2014 05:46:45 Output tor: AP9214 Priurlty:4 Type :ANIMAL - Animal Complaint Location:COLLEGE PLACE MOBILE #25, AUe at 31600 126TH AVE 5E #25, AUB I nee:vnac -hfm CF %I ATM PI and CF 11 CTM of Created: 05/28/2014 08:09:34 CRO9 V01077 Entered: 05/28/2014 08:10:50 CR09 V01077 Dispatch: 05/28/2014 08:19:48 PD40 V01011 Enraute: 05/28/2014 08:24:09APM529AP9505 08:19:48 -PRIU 8A9 Onscene: 05/28/2014 08 :33 :52APM52-9AP9505 08:33 :52 *ONSCN 8A9 Control: 165/M/2014 09:46:29 APM529AP9505 8A9 Case #: CAP 140006758 Closed: 05/28/2014 10:50:53 APM529 AP9505 ICUnit: PrirneUnite8A9 Diap*.RTF Type;AN1MAL - Animal Complaint Agancy:AP Groop:A1 Beat:A3 RD;AP3531 Case #:CAP140006758 M Getall 08:09:34 CREATE Location: COLLEGE PLACE MOBILE #25, AUB Type :ANIMAL Na_me:GOODWIN, SHARRON /OWNER Phone: 253.833.5604 Group :A1 RD /Map8ox:AP3531 ypeDesc :Animal Complaint LocDesc:at 31600 1.26TH AVE SE #25, AUB LocCross:btwn SE 314TH PL and SE 315TH PL Prlority.4 Class: F:1AC Agency:AP LocType :C RPCon ?:Y 08:09:34 AL.I E911Phne:253/8.3.3 -5604 E911 Pilot: 253/833 -5604 E911Add:31600 126TH AVE SE #88 AUB E911Subs :COLLEGE PLACE MOBILE E911Srce:BUSN 08:10:50 ENTRY Comment:LARGE HUSKY GOT OUT AND INJ ANOTHER DOG - DOG I5 NOW CONTAINED AGAIN BY OWNER AT LOC - VICT DOG IS EN ROUTE TO VET WITH OWNERS NOW - VICT DOG LIVES IN #26 - RP CALLING FROM OFFICE #88 08:10:50 - SELECT 08:10:50 - PREMIS Comment:PPR 08:12:33 NOMORE 08 :19:48. DISP BA9 Operator:AP9505 OperNames:WINNI =R, GEORGE 08:19:48 -PRIU 8A9 08:24:09 *_ENRTE 8A9 08:33 :52 *ONSCN 8A9 08:45:50 *RFT 8A2 Comment: INQUIRY 08:57 :46 *CASE 8A9 Case #: CAP 140006758 D9:41:05 *RFT 8A9 Comment:INQUIRY WANT,FISHER, ATHENA R, 12161981 09:43 :27 *RFT 8A9 Comment:INQUIRY SPAWN,FISHER,ATHENA R ,12161981,F, 09:46:29 *OK 8A9 10:44:50 *RFT 8A9 Comment 'INQUIRY WANT,BAZALDUA, LESLIE M,0918199() .... 10111 f I1011r; r,,,,, r,,,, 0,, r,,,,,, 10:50:53 *CLEAR 8A9 Dis o: RTF 10:50:53 -PRIU M 10:50:53 -CLEAR 10:50:53 *CLOSE IN IName (Phone IRPaddr (RPCon? IIDCCOde IAltPhn IRPCbh4 http: / /vcatib- web/ B78Q LiVeCAD/ Html /SystdmDocslCADliiterface.aspx? CMD -CHQ &QQQ= CAP6758&Fro... 5/31/2814 RECEIVED 06/1612014 00:21 253BO43116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS JUN/18/2014/WED 12,45 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2.539315108 P,025 CADM Page 2 of 2 GOODWIN, 5HARRON /OWNER 1253.833.5604 http:li vcc- tib- webB780LiveCAD IHtmilSystemDocslCADlntaface. aspic 7_CMD= CHQ &QQQ- CAP6758&lro.,. 5!31!2014 RECEIVED 06 }1812014 00:21 2538043116 AUBURN CITY CLERKS M.N /1$/2014AED 12:45 PM Auburn Police Dept FAX No,2539315106 P.026 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT Patrol Unit Report Notification/Approval Case Number Officer} Ante Initial Report _ or Follow Up# STAND ALONE Yes NQ)t/—'—_ VIDEO Yes No S.I.R Yes No Date �J�` Disposition ��(L WACIC Yes No X CAD sheet attached: Yes No% If yes, Car Number Gang Incident: GG01 GG02 GG03 FOkw"b TO: City Pros. CPS APS ME CRT Detectives 7uvy Pros. _ DOC Mall _ Traffic School DV Other Correction needed as follows: Sent back to Officer for Correction (Sgt) (Date) Returned to Sgt for review with corrections made / (Officer) (Date) Reviewed and Sent to Records by Sgt. 5-5 / 0 O S// (Name) (Date Processed by Specialist AQ wlo 1 06-09-1.4 (Name) (Date) `hint Date Wtials Date ACCESS Entry: QC: Modify: QC: Cancel/CLR: QC: O /Admin -All Secretaries/Forms — 0111712013