HomeMy WebLinkAbout6584 ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 8 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2015 CITY
OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the City of Auburn is required to take
action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development
regulations at least every seven years; and
WHEREAS, over the course of the last two years, a substantial effort has been
undertaken to engage the public, business community, service organizations, cultural
communities, and other City departments to obtain feedback, thoughts, ideas, and
concerns around which to develop a 20 year vision, city values, goals and objectives,
policies, and actions; and
WHEREAS, this effort began with a community-wide visioning exercise at the
end of 2013 which generated more than a thousand comments that have been used to
help define a vision and value statement for the City; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106, the City of Auburn provided its
draft Comprehensive Plan to the Washington State Department of Commerce on
October 13, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn also provided its draft Comprehensive Plan to the
Puget Sound Regional Council on October 13, 2015, in accordance with the procedural
requirements outlined in the Puget Sound Regional Council Interlocal Agreement for
Regional Planning in the Central Puget Sound Area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Planning Commission scheduled and held public
meetings on May 21, 2014, January 6, March 17, April 7, April, 14, April 21, May 5., June
2, October 20, November 4, and December 8, 2015, for the purposes of staff
presentations and discussion on the various components of the plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and held public hearings on
April 7, April 14, April 21, June 2, November 4, and December 8, 2015, to receive public
testimony on the proposed Plan.; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended to
the City Council adoption of the final draft Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds it appropriate and in the best interest
of the City to adopt the Auburn Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Core
Ordinance No. 6584
December 2, 2015
Page 1 of 3
Comprehensive Plan, the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, the Capital
Facilities Element, the Utilities Element, the Transportation Element, the Economic
Development Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, the Appendices listed within
the Core Comprehensive Plan, and the referenced functional plans listed in the Capital
Facilities Element; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan meets the criteria set forth in the Auburn City Code and aU other
applicable legal criteria; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is
consistent with the Growth Management Act, the King County and Pierce County
County-Wide Planning Policies, and the Puget,Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has reviewed its development regulations for
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act, and has
determined that the City's adopted development regulations are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of this ordinance, the City of Auburn has completed the
mandatory periodic comprehensive plan review process that is set forth in RCW
36.70A.130.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows
Section 1. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan. The City of Auburn 2015
Comprehensive Plan on file with the office of the City Clerk is adopted and is available
for inspection therein.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out.the directions of this
legislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
Ordinance No. 6584
December 2, 2015
Page 2 of 3
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
DEC - 7 2015
FIRST READING:
SECOND READING: DEC 14. 2015
PASSED: DEC 14 2015
APPROVED: ._ DEC 14 2015
_ NANC ACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
-ka-"- e
Da 'elle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPRO ='D
7 AS TO F RM:
D iel B. Heid, ity Attorney
PUBLISHED:
Ordinance No. 6584
December 2, 2015
Page 3 of 3
��� � �SyF
� ����'Y���u „_.��,
��.%- ,,• "
������ ��H� �� AGENDA BILL AP�PROVAL- FORM
��``�`� ,� 1�i�`r1S�-11�C;'C�i�
Agenda.Subject: Date:
O�dinance No. 6584, First Reading December 2, 2015
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Community Development Exhibit 1-Ordinanoe Na 6584 ��
and Public Works Exhibit2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4 .
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
Exhibit 9
Exh'ibit 10
� Exh'ibit 11 I
Exhibit 12 I
Exhibit 13 '
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6584,
Background Summary:
Backar_ound:
Chapter 36.70A:130 of the Growth Management Acf (GMA) establishes a requirement
that cifies periodically review and update, if necessary; their comprehensiye plans
every 7 years. The deadline for updating the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan was I
July 1, 2015. State and regional agencies have been supportive of the City's ongoing
efforts to complete the comprehensive plan update, but have also indicated that it is
'important for the City to take final action prior to December 31, 2015.
RCW 36.70A.030 establishes the mandatory requirements for"elements" that must be
included in a comprehensive plan. Those elements include land use, housing, capital
fa.cilities, utilities, transportation, eeonomic clevelopment, and parks and
recreation. Volumes 1 thru 7 are fitled and organized to be consistent with the GMA
requirements. Additionally, the City has opted to create a "Core Comprehensive Plan" ,
which serves as the foundation for all of fhe mandatory elements.
� Overview:
ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 65 of 751
Tlie Comprehensive Plan establishes the planning framework forAuburn out fo the
year 2035 and beyond. The Core Plan sets forfh the City's vision, values, goals, broad
policies, and actions that are necessary in order to achieve the stated
objectives. Volumes 1 thru 7 are the policy documents that establish the details for
how to achieve the objeetives.
Pr.ocess:
Exhibits 2 thru 10 constitute the City of Auburn Planning Commission's recommended
Compcehensive Plan. The Planning Commission's recommendation concludes a
public process that began in Q4 of 2013. In addition to the standard series of Planning
Gommission meetings and hearings, the public p�ocess included a citywide visioning
exercise, several public workshops, numerous public presentafions, continuous
webpage updates, routine citywide email notifcations and updates, and one citywide
mailer. Appendix E of the Plan provides a detailed overview of all of the public
outreach efforts.
In addition to the above described public outreach efforts, the City is also reguired to
initiate State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as well, as delivery of materials
through a formal notification process to the Washington State Department of
Commerce and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). It is worth noting that both
the State Department of Commerce and PSRC provided meaningful praise for the
City's approach, efforts and the quality of the product. PSRC provided about a dozen
relatively minor suggested edits which were incorporated into the appropriate planning
documents and are reflected in the Planning Commission's recommendation.
Im�ortant Note: Exhibits 2 thru 10 are the initial staff drafts for each
document. These versions are being #ransmitted to City Council for first
ordinance reading on December 7th because the Planning Commission will not
deliberate and act on the materials until December 8th. In order to respect the
Planning Commission's role and responsibility, staff is not transmitting their
recommendation until December 9th which will be.included in City Council's
December 14th packet. Therefore, City Council's second reading on December
14th_will likely include updated maferials to reflect the Planning Commission's
recommendation. This approach was used in order to ensure that City Council
had an opportunity to consider adoption of the Plan before December 31, 2016.
Following City Council action, CDPW intends to deliver the Comprehensive Plan for
�final professional formatting and editing. This will likely result in suggested technical
eorrections pertaining to grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other types of
scrivener's errors. This effort will not result in any substantive change.
Plan Orqanization:
ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 66 of 751
As indieated above, Exhibit 2 thru 10 constitute the Comprehensive Plan. However,
there are several appendices that are "inputs" or reference documents that were used
to develop the Plan (e.g. the 2014 Imagine Aubum Vision Report). Aciditionally, there
are several ``outputs" or extensions of the Plan that further implement the stated
vision, goals and objectives (e.g. functional plan such as the specific utility plans). The
Planning Commission's recommendation includes a recommendation to adopt the
Iisted appendices and the referenced functional plans; Exhibit 10 provides a specific
list of the appendices and referenced functional plans that will be adopted as part of
the adoption of Ordinance No. 6584.
Following City Council action, CDPW intends to deliver the Comprehensive Plan for
final professional formatting and edifing. This will likely result in suggested technical
corrections pertaining to grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other fypes of
scrivener's errors. This effort will not result in any substantive change..
Plan Orqanization:
_ _
As indieated above, Exhibit 2 thru 10 constitute the Comprehensive Plan. However,
there are several appendices that are "inputs" or reference documents that were used
to develop the Plan (e.g. the 2014 Imagine Auburn Vision Report). Additionally, there
are several "outputs" or extensions of the Plan that further implement the stated
vision, goals and objectives (e.g. functional plan such as#he specific utility plans). The
Planning Commission's �ecommendation includes a recommendation to adopt the
listed appendices and the referenced functional plans. Exhibit 10 provides a specific
list of the appendices and referenced functional plans that will be adopted as part of
the adoption of Ordinance No. 6584. '
Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance No. 6584 adopting the 2015 Gity of Auburn
Comprehensive Plan*
Exhibit 2: Core Comprehensive Plan
Exhibit 3: Volume 1 —Land Use Element
Exhibit 4: Volume 2—Housing Element
Exhibit 5: Volume 3—Gapital Facilities Element
Exhibit 6: Volume 4—Utilities Element
Exhibit 7: Volume 5—Transportafion Element
Exhibit 8: Volume 6— Economic Development Element
Exhibit 9: Volume 7—ParKs and Recreation Element
Exhibit 10: Reference to Functional Plans and Appendices that are Adopted by Referenee
Exhibit 11: Appendix J — ParKs, Arts, and Recreatiori Opeii Space Plan
Exhibit 12: Fublic Outreach
Exhibit 13: Fublic and Agency Comments
ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 67 of 751
'Exhibits 2 thru 9 are the elements that constitute the 2015 City of Aubum Comprehensive
Plan
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember: StafF: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 7, 2015 Item IVumber: ORD.E
ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 68 of 751
�x��i�i� �
ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 8 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTQN, ADOPTING THE 2015 CITY
OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the City of Auburn is required to take
action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development
regulations at least every seven years; and
WHEREAS, over the course of the last two years, a substantial effort has been
undertaken to engage the public, business community, service organizations, cultural
communities, and other City departments to obtain feedback, thoughts, ideas; and
concerns around which to develop a 20 year vision, city values, goals and objectives,
policies; and actions; and
WHEREAS, this effort began with a community-wide visioning exercise at the
end of 2013 which generated more than a thousand comments that have been used to
help define a vision and value statement for fhe City; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106, the City of Aubum provided its
draft Comprehensive Plan to the Washington State Department of Commerce on
October 13, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn also provided its draff Comprehensive Plan to the
Puget Sound Regional Council on October 13, 2015, in accordance with the procedural
requirements outlined in the Puget Sound Regional Council Interlocal Agreement for
Regional Planning in the Central Puget Sound Area; and
WHEREAS, the Gity of Auburn Planning Commission scheduled and held public
meetings on May 21, 2014, January 6, March 17, April 7; April 14, April 21, May 5, June
2, October 20, November 4, and December 8, 2015, for the purposes of staff
presentations and discussion on the vacious components of the plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and held public hearings on
Apcil 7, April 14, April 21, June 2, November 4, and Decernber 8, 2015, to receive public
testimony on the proposed Plan; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended to
the City Council adoption of the final draft Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds it appropriate and in the best interest
of the City to adopt the Aubum Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Core
___ ____
Ordinance No. 6584
December2,2015
e 1 of 3
OR .� Page 69 of 751
Comprehensive Plan, the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, the Capitaf
Facilities Element, the Utilities Element, the Transportation Element, the Economic
Development Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, the Appendices listed within
the Core Comprehensive Plan, and the referenced functional plans Iisted in the Capital
Facilities Element; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan meets the criteria set forth in the Auburn City Code and all other
applicable legal criteria; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is
consistent with the Growth Management Act, fhe King County and Pierce County
Counfy-Wide Planning Policies, and the Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has reviewed its development regulations for
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Growfh Management Aet, and has
determined that the City's adopted development regulations ar'e consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of this ordinance, the City of Auburn has complefed fhe
mandatory periodic comprehensive plan review process that is set forth in RCW
36:70A.130.
NOW, THEREFORE, TH€ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows
Secfion 1. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan. The City of Auburn 2015
Comprehensive Plan o.n file with the office of the City Clerk is adopted and is available
for i_nspection therein.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
_ _. ._ _ _
Ordinance No. 6584
December2,2015
p e2of3
ORu.� Page 70 of 751
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five
.
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
FIRST READING:
SECOND READING:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: 'I
Ordinance No. 6584
December 2, 2015
p e3of3
ORU.� Page 71 of 751
Exhibit 2
�I� �� �� �� ��
COR� COIV� P��I� �N�IV� PLAN
COVER PAGE
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
_ _ .
TO BE FILL_E..D WITH TITLE AND GRAPHIC
ORD.E Fage 72 of 751
Acknowledgments
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TO BE FILLED WITH NAMES AND ORGANIZATION
Gity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 2
ORD.E Page 73 of 751
Table of Contents
Introduction and Background
Executive Summary
User's Guide
Community Profile and Characteristics
Community Vision and Values
Character
Wel l ness
Service
Economy
Celebration
Environment
SustainabiJity
Policy Elements
Volume 1-Land Use Policy Element
Volume 2-Housing Policy Element
Volume 3=Capital Facilities Poli,cy Eleme.n.t
Volume 4-Utilities Policy Element
Volume 5-Transportation Policy Element
Volume 6- Economic Development Rolicy Element,
Volume 7- Parks and Open Space Folicy Element
Future Land Use Map
Appendices
City of Autiurn � Core Compreherisive Plan Page 3
ORD.E Page 74 of 751
Introduction and Background
Auburn is in the midst of an exciting stage of its evolution. From the 1850's until.the mid 1990's,
Auburn has transitioned from a railroad and farming communiry to a small town. Since then, the
dynamism brought upon by opportunities and challenges that come with growth and progress
have drastically changed the Ciry. With the annexations that occurred in the late 1990's and 2000's,
the overall growth since the 2000's,and its anticipated growth oyer the next 20 years,Aubu.rn is
maturing into a City of local and regional significance with an operating budget in excess of a
quarter billion dollars annually: This ongoing maturation has changed Auburn from a relatively
insulated small town, nestled in the midst of many other sirriilar communities that surround Seattle
and Tacoma,to a City with its own complex identiry and a myriad of dreams and dilemmas. At the
time of settlement and forthe next 100 years,the Aubum ofi2035,with its 100,000 projected
residents,would be hard to imagine.
Auburn's transition from a small town to a Ciry of regional significance is far frorri complete. There
is much work ahead of us. While we are fortunate to ha�e.many strengths and opportunities to
build upon,we also know that we have work to-do in manqareas. We must prepare for the future
challenges we know we will face,as well as those that will be pre'sented to us along the way. This
Comprehensive Plan estabfishes a commitment to a futuce:Auburn and lays the foundafion for how
we will navigate the next 20 years: It.accomplishes this by�expressing the following:
a Descnbing a vision for Auburn.
• Declaring our commitment to core values.
• Setting olp icies to.achieve the visi.on, �" `
• Outlining actions that adhere to core values.
There were a variety of sources that shaped this Plan, but the single greatest influence is the
people who live,work,and visit Au6urn. The process for developing this Plan includeci input from
more than 1,000 citizens and business owners who shared their opinions,criticisms, ideas and
concems regarding where we are today and where we need to be in the future. The following is
an overview of the key inputs'that shaped this Plan:
. In 2014 the Ciry conducted the`'Imagine Auburn"visioning exercise,which yielded about
1,000 responses from citizens,visitors and business owners. This effort alone provides a
major source of influenee for the Plan.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 4
ORD.E Page 75 ofi 751
• A substantial amount of demographic data was analyzed in order to understand the profile
of our community and to identify trends in our community. These data provided a
significant amount of information toward formulating ideas and concepts.
• The Auburn Health Impact Assessment and Housing In�enfory were focused studies
conducted to provide enhanced information in important areas. These studies provide
direct input on how to promote a healthy lifestyle in Auburn and how to manage the diverse
hous.ing stock that exists in a City that is 124 years old.
e The Washington State Growth Management Act, King and Pierce Countywide Planning
Polieies,and the Puget Sound Regional Council VISION 2040 are laws and policies under
which the Ciry must plan. While these do not define our vision, they do establish the
framework within which we must operate.
The Comprehensive Plan is a guidance document, At its nucleus are the City's collective vision
and values which provide a foundation forfuture direction. The policies and actions will help the ��
Mayor, City Council, and staff follow the path to our vi'sion, b.ut we'must remember'that this path is
wide and it will meander a bit. The world around us is constantly changing,so being flexible and
open-minded allows us to better face the challenges that confront us.
_ ._ g
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Pa e 5
ORD.E Page 76 of 751
Executive Summary
The Auburn of 2035 will be an exciting;vibrant city where businesses want to locate and people
want to live or visit, This docu.ment constitutes the plan that Ciry leadership will utilize to achieve
positive outcomes.
Reading through the plan may lead to questions about the City's aspirations and goals. In many
ways,Auburn is a"diamond in the rough". The City's elected officials, staff members,and citizens
overwhelmingly believe thaistrong leadership and considered,planning can lead to Auburn
�ealizing its potential. With two major rivers;access to many parks and trails, a solid business core,
a committed governme.nt, and a long list of other assets and traits;Aubum has all the right building
blocks to achieve great things. We just need to put those building'blacks togeth,er and commit to
carrying out all the things we need to do to get there; We are eage�to continue the good work that
has already been done, but are even more excited to ascend to a much higher level.
You might also wonder how we got taa point of defining a�ision or laying out the plan to get there.
While there are many inputs that helped.guide this process,the vision and resultant plan starts with
the people who either live here or spend their tirrie working hece or visiting, That feedback
provided great insight into our strengths and weaknesses,perceptians and concems, as well as
ideas for what Auburn,stioulei�tie i�n.the future. The foll'o�nii.ng�is�a list that captures many of the
thoughts that were sha�ed: � _�
1. Citizens of Auburn share atremendous pride in cammunity-this is perhaps the most important
building block for successfut irnplementation of a Comprehensive Plan.
2. We are`a community that`delights in our history,.which makes if hard to know the way forward
in a way that embraces the`new and unknown,while honoring the past-we need to overcome
� this paradox'that slows our progress. ��
3. Auburn has an eictensive inventory of parks, natural areas, and open spaces,as well as arts and
recreation opportuRities-these are essential components for a healthy community where
people want to live, pfay and work.
4. Most residents commute to jobs that are outside Auburn,while most people who work in
Auburn arrive from other locations-we need to explore ways to change this pattern.
5. Auburn has a robust colleetion of environmental �esources. Through a combination of
protection, preservation and education both people and wildlife desefve a healfhy natural
environment.
6. We ar.e proud of,an..d fi_nd strength in,our social, cultural and ethnic diversity-continuing to
further eelebrate and leverage our diversity is a necessity.
. _ - - -
Gity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 6
ORD.E Page 77 of 751
7. Auburn lacks complete non-motorized connections that join residential areas with commercial
centers, recreational opportunitie.s,or ofher residential neighborhoods-addressing this
eoncern will create more opportuniry to live a healthy lifestyle, use,other modes of transport
aside from cars, and build our sense of a connected community.
8. The presence of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe offers great opportunity for partnership and to
mutually enhance our economic, social and cultural presence within the community and
region-we need to continue to builci our relationship with MIT to capitalize on these
opportunities.
9, Histo..ric downtown Auburn has maintained a Main Street that many communities have long
since lost and are seeking ways to recreate -we need to continue our work to make downtown
Auburn a desfination to visit and a pedestrian-friendly,transit orie:nted location to live.
10. Our physical location between Seattle and Tacorna, along the Sound Transit commuter line,
and af the intersection of SR-18 and SR-167 are ideal conditions for ehsuring efficient
movement of goods and people-we need to better exploit ourlocation advantage when trying
to attract businessesand residents: ` �
11. There is a sentiment that Aubum coulcl be safer-we need,to overcome this perception so that
Aubum is a more desirable place to li�e,work and play. _..
12. There is a high level of dedication, commitment and excellence at�our local school districts and
Green River College-we.need to strengthen our partner�hips with these institutions that are
equally passionate about elevating Auburn to a p"remier community.
13. Auburn has a diverse mix of housing,types, however that does not mean it is appropriately
_ ;, _
distributed throughout the City-while�we���have achieved or exceeded our goals for providing a
.� . , ,
mix of housing,there is a need to better disperse different types of housing throughout the Gity,
while preserving existi.ng housing stoek..
14, Auburn already has a robustand diverse base of businesses, but there is a need to further
diversify-we:need more businesses that generate revenue and jobs that will lead to local
spe.nding.
15. Many of Auburn's streets are deteriorating due to their age, inereased traffievolumes, especially
he_avy trucks, or from design and construction standards based on previous jurisdictional
requirements prior to their annexation into the City-we need to sustain revenue streams and
to allocate resources in a manner that keeps our streets in good condition.
16. Access to healthy food and activities varies greatly throughout the City-this disparity should be
equalized in order to ensure that our entire community has the ability to choose to live a
healthy lifestyle.
_ _ __ _ _..
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 7
ORD.E Page 78 of 751
17. We are passionate about the extensive level of social and human services that exists in Auburn
but bel.ie�e that other com.munities need to follow our example rather than lean on u..s to take
care of tfiose in need-we struggle with how to provide local support within an o�erall
ba�anced regional approach.
18. As a 124 year old City there are buildings and areas in Aubum that are tired in their appearance
and function-we need to find ways to help energize the way those areas look and f.eel.
The Core Plan establishes a vision and series of values that are used to address the abo�e themes.
By outlining the goals, policies and actions necessary to build upo;n our strengths and ove�come
A,
our weaknesses.
� � � �
z M �
� � �� � .� � .,
� ���
_ _. .. _ _
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 8
ORD.E Page 79 of 751
User's Guide
The Comprehensive Plan is comprised of the Core Plan,a number of Contributing Reports(inputs),
and a number of Policy Elements (outputs). The following is an overview of the types of
documents that are included in the plan,how they are used,and fheir intended audienee.
- _ _.
�� E.xamples of Contributing � 1 '�`Examples af Polrcy� �
�
Reports Inputs) ,=.;Ele�nents O�u� .uts ,;�,:������
�k,.�,,.. �_ . . _� ,.... ...�... ,�
- � � �. Utilities �
Health Impact .:. Land Use � �� Element ..
''�,� Assessment �` _ _ '�. leri�en�t �'� +.'��r�
« �
E ; �.,,,,
I, � 4 9
+
, , � ��; .. �. . `: '�i.�. ...Wy,.l���r�r!:J�
�,Ea��, u , .
. -��. P,afkS 8i��2eC °
-,.�
, ,,,,
.� � � ���
Imagine ,. `' eQC'�;P�aCt. '' :..._ Housing, - °'�Element
�a� Auburn � ' �� Element, � � -�_�
������ �� � � - � C�apifal Facil'�tie��
Growth �E� Transportat,ion" Elemenf
w Mana ement A �� �
g �' Element "� �
� ,,
.�; _ u
..��.,�.
��
°Economic d�t
� � �3ev Element�,��
`�� ����t � ����,���_���
Co�e Plan:The Core Plan serves as the>principal planning and guidance document used by City
leadership.in thei�efforts to implement the Communiry's vision. It is a document that is intended to
be used and consulted by City Council,a„nd staff when evaluating city decisions, allocating city
resources, reviewing Policy Ele,ments, cornmitting to new City endeavors,and maki.ng fiscal
decisions. Every discussion and aetion by City Council should start and end with the following:"/s
this action t�ue to our long te�m City vision;does it a/ign with our City va/ues,�and is it consistent
with our adopted policies?"
ContributmcLReports: Contributi.ng R.eports are"inputs" into the Core Plan. Contributing Reports
provide statutory rules or backgroun.d analysis and data that are used to help develop vision,
values, policies,and priorities. Examples of Contributing Reports include the Buildable Lands
Analysis,the Imagine Auburn community visioning report,the Growth Management Act, and the
Health Impact Assessment. These Reports are either prepared by City staff to better understand
conditions within Aubum or are provided by other government agencies that provide statewide or
regional planning parameters.
. _ --.._. - -----
City of Auburn � Gore Comprehensive Plan Page 9
ORD.E Page 80 of 751
PolicyElements: Policy Elements are"outputs"of the Core Plan: Policy Elements provide guida.nee
in specific areas such as land use, housing,transportation, and pa.rks. These elem.ents establis.h
how the city should manage systems and "resourees today and into the future. Wth support f�om
City staff, Policy Elements are developed and adopted by City Council. Once adopted, Policy
Elements become a manual for City staff in their implementation efforts to design and construct
capital projects, develop and maintain city programs;draft development regulations, pursue grant
money, and to carry out other types of rypical tasks. Policy Elements are the principal planning and
guidance documents for City staff.
Where conflict or a..mbiguity exists between a Policy Element and a Ci.ry regulation, the specific
Policy Element will p�evail. Where there is eonflict or ambi'guity between Policy Elements or if a
Rolicy Element does not provide enough guidance to resolve the confliGt or ambiguity,the vision,
values, and overarching policies of the Core Plan will be used to arrive at a final decision.
:,
Cify of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 10
ORD.E Page 81 of 751
Community Profile and Characteristics
Popu/ation Growth
As of 2014,Auburn ranks as the 14th most populated city within the State of Washington with a
population of approximately 76,347. It is located within the two most populous counties in the state
(King and Pierce counties) and is nearly equid.istant from its two largest cities, Seattle and Tacoma.
Proximity to both of these cities, and being in a central loca.tion within Puget Sound Region, has.
helped Auburn grow at asteady rate. Aubum's growth can be ch.a�aeterized in three eras. The 67
year settlement era of 1893 to 1950 saw the City grow to a size of 6,500 resident:s. The 40 year
absorption era of 1950 to 1990 saw a substantial amount of infill development and the Ciry inc�ease
at a rate of about 6,500 residents per decade to 33,000. Since 1990, the Ciry has been going
through an expansion era fhat has seen three significant annexations of areas that have substaritial
development potentiaL
Racia/and Ethnic Characte�istics
Auburn has seen significant demographic changes over the last decade.According to the 2010
U.S..Census, approximately 70.5%of Auburn's population is White7Non-Hispanic;data from the
2000 Census reported the white population in Auburn at 79%: In 1990,the white population was
�oughly 90%.V1/hat this means is that Auburn has grown significantly more diverse in a 25-year
period.As of 2014 estimates,the overall white population is just under 50,000 at 49,238.This means
that approximately 68S%ofiAuburn's poqulation is white. If this trend continues,Auburn will
become increasingly racially diverse.
Househo/d and/ncome eharacterisfics
_ _ .
The year 2000,Census indicated that A,uburn had 16,108 househ.olds; this number has catapulted.
The current household number`es,timates (based on 2013 figuces) have inc�eased to 27,427.This
significant i'ncrease is due to substantial developrnent activiry over the past 1.5 0�so years and
significant annexations. Homeownership in Auburn is just under 60 percent,which is 3;5 points
lower than the:State.average.The lower percentage of homeownership corresponds to Aubu�n's
other below-Washington averages in per capita income; median household income, graduation
rate,as well as a tiigher-than-average percentage of persons underthe poverry level.Aubwrn's
median household incor�ie is$55,483 compared to the Washington average of�59�478, which is a
neariy$4,000 difference,thus reducing ea..rning power.
Age Charecteristics
Auburn is a statistically a younger community than thestate of Washington.The median age in
Washington is 37 years;the median age in Aubum is 35.5.This is up from 34.1 years of age in 2000.
While the median age has increased,the youth population remains significant. 7.4%of Auburn
residents are under 5 yeacs of age and 25'.9%are under the age of 18 both of which are
significantly higher than the state average.The percentage ofipeople over the age of 65 is 102%,
which compares similarly to the state of Washington figure of 12.3%. Demographic data suggests a
City of Auburn � Core Comprehen.sive Plan Page 11
ORD.:E Page 82 of 751
need for services and programming that address the needs of children and families,while
continuing to focus on the needs of more mature adults and single people of all ages.
Resident Labor Force and Employment Cha�acteristics
Since its population boom during the construction of the railroad freight terminals at the start of the
20th Century,Auburn has in many cespects remained a``blue collar"community. This t�end,
however, is declining as local economies in Washington diversify. In 1990,one out of four of
Aubum's residents worked in the manufacturing indusTry. Between 1990 and 2000,Auburn's
resident labor fo"rce lost 1,000, o�approximately one-fourth, of the_se manufacturihg jo6s. This t�end
of manufacturing job loss has been a nationwide t�end, as companies relocate to other cit.i.es and
states based on tax savings, and many other companies a.re inc�easingly outsourcing jobs
overseas. In this ever-cfianging landscape,jobs continue to mig�ate,into iiiffe�ent sectors,This slow
shift is evidenced by the lessened impact of major employers in Aubum_.They no longer dominate
the job market as sma.11 and mediu.m-sized compa..nies create more jobs.qs recently as 2002,the
top ten employers accounted for nea..rly 85%of the total city employment: In 2011, these same
employers,which remained in the top ten, accounteci for 55%ofithe total employment base.This
illustrates that the number of total jobs has significantly inc,reased and fhat the number of job
providers or employers has also increased. .
Generally,workers are tasked with finding jobs where compensation is most lucrative. Education
and specialized skills typically play a large role in finding high-paying,,available jobs.An educated
population encourages-companies to relocate to Aubum base.d on the'available local workforce..
While Auburn's high school graduation rate of 87:5ai6 is fiairly dose to the state average of 90�i6,the
college graduation rate is more than,9 points lowerthan the state average.As mentioned
previously,the median and.per.capita`income is signifieantly lower than the state average.These
data suggest that the"re,.may be a skills under match°between regional employer expectations and
available workers in Auburn. `
Accortling to the Puget Sou�nd Regional Council (PSRC) and the US Department of Labor,
approximately 41;000 jobs are loca.ted in Auburn. Th.is number has grown steacl_ily sinee 201_0; it is
important to note.ihat the number of jobs must be considered with an understandi.ng of the
massi�e loss of manufacturing jobs�and the very slow national econo.mic recovery since the
economic downtu:rn in 2008. Compari.ng the market sector d.ist�ibution and numbe�of jobs
;
between 1995,2000, 2010,and 2013 illust�ates some changes that have taken place in Aubum's job
market over the last 20 years. It also reflects nationwide trends based on the overall health of the
economy,decline of manufacturing, and an increasing reliance on service. Important categories to
note are:
a. Government and education,which have grown baseci on the increasing population of
Auburn and the need to provide increased and better service to residents,as well as the
success of Green River College
__ _ _ _. _ . _ . _ _ _ -
Gity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 12
ORD.E Page 83 of 751
b. Trade,transportation, and utilities jobs(WTU) have more than doubled since 1995, also due
to the relative growth of Auburn
c. Construction has nearly doubled since 1995;this is due in large part to fhe significant
development that has been constructed in Auburn,such as Lakeland Hills;the dip in 2010 is
due to the economic downturn that began in 2008
d. Retail and services are significantly more important to Auburn's cur�ent job outlook than in
1995;seryice is largely increased due to the overa.11 nationwide trend of less manufaeturing
a.nd mo�e service-based jobs
e. Finance, insurance,and real estate have held steady over the last 20 years
Table 1-Job Distribution by Market Area-1995-2013
--- .- ---- - _ __ _ __ __ __ _ � .
1995 2000 - 20TQ 2013
ConsbRes 1,693 3,051 2,148 2,636
FIRE 760 567 757 784
_ _ _ _
Manufacturing 11,530 12,241 : , 7,521 8,680
Retail 3;275 5,152 4;T05 5,392
Services 6,241 11,437 •10,496 10,700
_.
WTU 2,716 3,fi19 5,475 6,626
-- _ .
Government 1,166 1,332 3,457 3,166
Education 1,282 1,344 2,810 2,981
- - r- -
Totat - 28,663 38;742 37,370 ` 40,964
Daily lnf/ow and Outf/ow.�The Aubum Commute
In 2013 theaverage daily commute from Auburn is 29,minutes, as of 2013 which is an incre.ase
since 2000. A more interesting issue t:h,an the length of people's com .mute is the number of people
commuting out of and into Aubu,rn. Both of these numbers far outstrip.the number of people who
I.ive and work within qubum. This number has been virtually unchanged over the last decade. The
number of residents af Aubu"rn, who also work in Auburn, has stayed at just over 4,000. The most
prom.ising data from tfie'inflow and outflow is that there is a significant increase in the number of
people commuting to Aubu�n for work. The influx of non-re.sidents provides another pool of people
that engage with the services,features,and resou�ces in the City.
_ _
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 13
ORD.E Page $4 of 751
� �� �� �. ,��� O`i'P�L�W��'►
� � � � � � ��af;.�. � ,. . m m m w�I .
s�,�a� �3,613
k�':N.::41a:tiI':' a'ti'�'':ti1t .ca'�Ni.:t
w(78K4Et'�i:z IkWJf;Y Y!_�Sfi'klf�'�
P�&x,` lVt_�t+Alh('.;�.N C J51FSI;t:�P
hUl4U':^N hii$y.k„t
4��4,535
���
�
Aubum in the Future—Rrojections of Growth
The Puget Sound:Regional Council,King Coun.ry, Pie�ce County and the Ciry of Aubum need to
understand growfh,projections, pattems and implications for the 20-30 year planning horizon.
Based on various moiiels and analyses,available developable land, population data, and expected
economic trends,jurisdictions can better understand industrial,commercial,and residential land
supply and capacity.This understanding can be used to extrapolate future available housing units
and employment growth.
The primary data tool for planning for future growth are Gounty prepared buildable lands analysis.
These reports establish the parameters around which cities and counties jointly plan for both
residential and job growth. As a two county city, the City of Auburn coordinates with both King
County and Pierce County in determining growth projections, land supply, and the adequacy of
urban services to serve future growth. The following description and data are taken from the King
Counry and Pierce County Buildable Lands Analyses. ,
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 14
ORD.E Page 85 of 751
2014 King County Buildable Lands Analysis
Afte�deducting for consfraints,future right-of-way and public purpose needs,and after applying a
rnarket factor,the King County Buildable Lands Analysis shows that Auburn has approximately
2;150.5 adjusted net acres of vacant and redevelopable residentially zoned land available during
the planning period through 2031. As seen in Table 2,the majonty of available lancJ for
development is zoned forsingle-family residential purposes.
Based on the residential land supply analysis and historical densities, an estimate of housing unit
capacity was de�eloped. Table 2 identifies the estimated capacity(in housing units) in King
County by the aggregated zoning type. This estimate shows a capacity of approximately 14,597
housing units in the King County portion of the City exists outto the year 2031.
Table 2-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres of Vacant and Redevelopable Land and Capacity by
Aggregated Residential Zoning Type
. _ m_ �
; o- � Gross. . . ���� �Adjusted � '� �Net Capacity ;:
_.,. , �� .
, � �� ��--_ Acres ��� Net,Acres�(1) �(Hausing units),� �
. . __ �____
Single Family-Vacant 2,018.0 1,050.1 3,477
_ - — ---_ _
Single Family- Redevelopable 1,507A 871.1 ' 3,108
Multi-Family-Vacant 120 85.4 1,156
_ . _ _ .
__.
Multi-Family- Redevelopable 50,0 36.3 460
_._
--
Multi-Family/ Mixed Use-Vacant ` 16 12,9 1,822
- _ _ . _ _ _ .
Multi-Family/ Mixed Use- Redevelopable 117.2 94.7 4,574
_ � .
_ _�_ _ �__ _
TOTAL 3,828.2 2,150.5' 14,597
.__ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _. � _
(1) "Ad�usted Net Acres represents land available for development after critical areas,anticipated right-of-way and public
purposes needs and a market factor have been iaken into account.
Estimates of'how much comm.e,rcial a...nd industnal square footage are available were also
calculated. The last column in Tabl.e'3 identifies the.gross and adjusted net vaeant and
redevelopable land by commercial and industrial land use from the King County Buildable Lands
analysis. Employment capacity was developed by applying a floo�area per employee ratio.
Table 3-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres and Capaciry of Commercial and Industrial
Land Supply(King County-2012j
_ . � _ _, . ,_.. . _.. _ . .
� � � f.
r;AcJjusfed ` Nei Capacity
- ( ) ��::;(Err�ployment)
� �� - � � ; Gi�oss Acres ��� Net Acres i�
__ --- _ _ _ ._ _ _
- - -.
Comrnercial VacanbRedevelopable 501.5 412.4 7,094
_ _. _ _
Mi.x.:ed Use Vacant/Redeyelopable 133.2 107.6 2,525
- ---- .
Industrial VacanURedevelopable 533.0 354.9 9,417
� �,, . �
TOTA�., � _ y,, , �� � �e �,1,167.7 � �������� `� �874.9 � � 19,036 � �. .. I
(1) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land after critical areas,future anUapated streets,land for public purposes and market
factor have been considered.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 15
ORD.E Page 86 of 751
Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis
Table 4 identifies the estimated capacity(in housing units) in Fierce County by the zoning type.
This estimate shows a capacity of approximately 922 housing units in the Pierce County portion of
the City exists to the year 2030.
Table 4-Gross and Adjusted Net Ac�es of Vacant and Redevelopable Land by Residential
Zoning Type(Pieree County-2012)
� �; � �4d�usfeii � Net Capaciry
_ � � �� E . . � �:�.
e G�ass Acres;' Net Acres.(1}` - (Ho�tsrng unitsj
R5, Resi.dential 39.24 �30,38 323
TV,Terraee View 3.17 1.34 86
------- —---_ _ _. - _ _ -
Lakeland Hills South PUD 52.94 N/A 513
m��
'�f)T/�L � � � � �� ��.'� . ��-. �� � .. , ;- � � 9�.35. � �: ;31.72��. � �. ��922 �`
�. . ���
_ � _ .__ _ . .,_
(1) "Adjusted Nef Acres"representsJand available for development after critical areas,anticipated right-of-way, lands
public purpose needs,and a market factor have been taken into account ` ,
The Pierce County Buildable Lands analysis includes a 2030 employment targef.of,843 and an
employmenf capaciry of 595. This estimate was based on the Iikely employment ge;nerated by the
commercial parcels located within Lakeland Hills South PUD and other vacant commercial lands
along A St. SE.
Table 5-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres and Capacity of Commercial and Industrial Land
Supply(Pierce County-2012j
�.` - - - -. , as -T -- ^ -- . Adjusted NefCapacity -
� � ' � `� �� � �Gross�Acres �� Net��Acres(1) � � (f ri�ployment) _
_ . . ..
Commercial.Vacant/Redevelopable 501.5 412.4 7,094
Mixed Use<VaeantfReclevelopabte 1332 ' 107.6 2,525
IndustrEal Vacant/Redevelopable , 533.0 354.9 9,417
_ , . . � r _ � ;
_;, 1,167:7 ��- �874:9, -� , �y 19;036
TOTAL� . . , � : . , . <, ;�n
_.____ ��---- - _._ �_..___ __ _ _ � _ _ ___ _ .__ _ ._m___ � _ - ----
(1) "Ad�usted Net Aeres"represents land after eritical areas,future anticipated streets,land for public purpases and market
factor have been consi8ered. �
Combined King County and Pierce County Projections and Allocations
Table 6 provides a city-wicJe sumrriary of housing unit and employment allocations.
Table 6-City of Aubum 2006=2030/31 Housing Unit and Employment Allocations(King and
Pierce Counties)
,.
„ �<; � �Housing Units Employment�rz
King County 9,004 19,200
Pierce County 3,634 843
-� _ _�a a _..r. �;� � ... �, -� -
aTQTAL F ` � 12,638'Units 20,043 Jokis "
,
v � � . . _ �
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 16.
ORD.E Page 87 of 751
Wh.ile the calculations and categories used preuiously to identify market sectors and job counts
differ,Table 7 illustrates the tremendous job growth expeeted over the next 25 years.The total
number of jobs in Auburn is projected to increase 55% by 2040. The largest total gain will be in the
Consfruction sector. Other significanf gains are in the FIRE/Services, Education and Retail/Food
Services sectors.
Table 7-Job Distribution by Market Area-2010-2040
`2010 : 2020 -:2030 ..` . 2Q40 2010 to�2040 Change
- - _ -- -
ConsVRes 2,488 4,747 4,704 5,822 134%
FIRE/Services 12,398 15,9.35 18,734 22,213 79:2%
Manufacturing/WTU 13,366 13,661 14,512 15,731 17.7%
Retail/Food Services 7,218 9,084 10,396 12;323 70.7%
_.� - -
Gove.rnme.nt 2,243 1,812 1;841 1,883 -16.1�/a .
__._. .
- . _
Education 2,137 3,143 3;466 3,815 78:5%
_ . _... . . o
Total �� � 39,883 � `�48,D23'� �53,$4� ;<< � 62,003 �' -' �� �-55.5% �-
Table 8 illustrates that around 37,000 units will be available by 2430-31. This is nearly 10,000 more.
units than in 2010; the addition of 20,040 more people waufd require this level of increase based on
the buildable lands population target, currentioning,and expected densities.Auburn is more than
prepared to accommodate this large influx of housing.Auburn is also prepared to consider
pathways to meet the housing demand on less land;through higher density a.nd by reconsidering
zoning implementation and rules.
Table 8- Population and Housing Forecasts-2010-2035
� _ . _ -_ ,. . .�__ �,.� . z . _ ____ . �____ _.
Esti mate - ` Farecasts
2010 2025 2030 2031 2035
Housing Units 27,827 34;582 36,827 37;276 39,072
Total Households 26,051 33,031 35,351 35,815 37,671
Household Population 69,491 84,126 88,996 89;970 93,866
� _ _: - --_ --�-
Total Population ` 7Q,159 84,948" 989;868. 90,852 94,788
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 17
ORD.E Page 88 of 751
Community Vision and Values
ln 2035Auburn is a ciry of connected and che�ished places, f�om a vibrant downtown to quiet open
spaces and everything in between, where a community ofhealthy, divecse, a.nd engaged people
!i've and thrive.
In 2014,a substantial amount of time and energy was dedicated to developing a vision for Auburn
in 2035. Discussions occurred in the communiry through the Imagine Aubum visioning process
and amongst city council members. Many themes and messages surfaced about who we are and
�.
what we aspire to become. In the words of City Couneil, a 2035:Aubum will be a"premier
community with vib�ant opportunities". Participants of Imagine.Auburn added ideas for what they
thought this meant. The vision that emergeii is encapsulated in the followirig seven value
statements:
1. Character: Developing and preserving attraet,iye and interesting places where people want to
be:
2. Wellness: Promoting community-wide health and safetywellness. '�
3. Service: Providing transparent government service.
4. Economy: Encouraging a diverse and thriving.marketplaee for consumers and businesses.
5. Celebration: Celebrating our diverse cultures; heritage,and community.
6. Environment: Stewarding our environrnent.
7. Sustainability: Creating a sustainable futwre for ourcominunity.
The Comprehensive Plan is rooted in these values and they form a collective vision. But these
values do noi end with the adoption,of this Pfan. Tliey`form the context around which we discuss,
debate,aet„prioritize and lead our community to.the vision we have c�eated in this Flan.
Identifying'values anci creating a description of whaf each of these values look like,what they
mean, and how they will happen establisties a basis for evaluating futuce City policies, regulations,
actions, investments, budget prionties,grant-seeking prionties, and other community decisions. In
addition, the seven Values underscore the entirety of the Comprehensive Plan and its
implementation,which includes the development of capital improvement, transportation, parks
and open space plans,and implementing regulations and standards.Tfiese values are the core of
how we make choices.
_ _ _ _ _. - -- --- - - - -- --. . _ __ __ .- -- -- -- _ __
City of Auburn � Core Compreherisive Plan Page 18
ORD.:E Page 89 of 751
Character
We will create and maintain fiigh quality neighborhoods, places,and spaees.
What it will look like:
• Active gathering spaces;such as parks, plazas, cafes, concert venues,festivals and markets,
will be distributed fhroughout the City;these spaces will be engaging and filled with people
interacting, irrespective of culture, age, or income level.
• Buildings, landscaping,and outdoor spaces will be attractiv.e, interesting,well designed;and
maintained
• Buildings will be well-maintained and rehabilitated and new buildings will comp:lement existing
historic resources.
• Neighborhoods will be socially and physically connected and include features and
development pattems that encourage us to interact.
• The communiry will haye embraced the concept of"One Auburn"while capitalizing on the
unique loca.l needs and identities of individual neighborhoods anci districts:
What it means:
• Auburn has a reputation for high quali.ry and engaging spaces, an array of performing arts
programs,wonderful public arts,extensive retail and restaurant options, and a variety of
community-led activities;a destination locale where citizens enjoy spending time, visitors look
forward to returning to,and.rnerchants want to stay;
• Gommunitiy programs and physical connections bring fhe City togefher.
• Residents and visitors have a wide range of options for getting to and from Auburn,as well as
travel alternatives within;the City., _
How it willhappen.
• By implementing investrnents and branding strafegies that recognize and reinforce an
individual identity for the Ci,ty and its neighborhoods.
• By looking for opportunitie"s to keep Auburn attractive,safe, interesting and fun,
• By ensuring that new construction and redevelopment of all projects incorporate amenities that
promote human interaction,furt.her connect the communiry, and create people-centcic land
uses;at the same time, property rights will be protected through due process, reasonable.
implementation of regulations,and careful consideration of impacts to existing development.
Th.e Ciry is committed to diversity and togethemes.s through innovative public space. Public space
will support dynamic businesses and events by being walkable and connected.We believe that if
we are forward-thinking, embracing of technology,supportive of arts, and advocates for safety,that
we will have places that are cohesive, accessible, and interesting.
City of Auburn � Gore Comprehensive Plan Page 19
ORD.E Page 90 of 751
Wellness .
We will build and maintain an envi.ronment that promotes public safety and healthy lifestyle
options.
What it will look like:
• Multi:ple recreation opti.ons,and nearby trail.s, parks, activities,and events that will be readily
accessible to the en.tire community.
• A safe and i.nviting atmgsphere for all will be provided throughout Auburn.
• A variety of healthy food options will be physicalJy and economically accessible to all members
of the Aubum comrnuniry:
• Housing stock will be maintained and monitored to limit the presence of declining, unsafe
neighborhoods:
• Risk to life and propertyfrom hazards will be minimized.
• Public infrastructure will be well-maintained:
What it means-
• More outdoor private and public amenities that offerpeople recreation options and safe
passage throughout.the communiry _
• Fresh, local and healthy food options should be_available to'all members of the community.
• Housing, neighborhoods,and spaces are he�ld to a high standard.
• More communiry health cesources i.n more.,places,fo"r more people.
• The public perception�and reality,will be that Aub;urn is a safe;place.
�
How it will happen; . `
• By applying saund enviranmental design,.implementing housing and neighborhood
maintenance standards buiEding and/orfinancing infrastructure that connect the community,
and invesfing in rec�eation amenities andsafety features.
• By promoting and supporting programs in businesses; non-profits, and public agencies that
provide healthy food and lifiestyle options
• By proactively planning and preparing the City for unanticipated natural events and by
implementing regulatory reqiairements.that mitigate exposure to natural hazards.
� By proactively plarining and;preparing the Ciry to mitigate for and adapt to climate change and
its associated effects.
� By developing programs that provide technical and/or financial assistance to ensure quality
development and improve substandard housing, neighborhoods, and spaces.
• By budgeting appropriately to maintain Ciry services that provide direct benefits to public
safery, housing, neighborhoods,and community health and wellness.
• By connecting healthcare and health resource providers with all populations of the City.
Enhanceci quality of life through safe,walk.able ne.igh.borhqod design, lighting, a.nd.access to parks,
grocery stores,schools, medical services, and community centers should be available to all Auburn
City ofAuburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 20
ORD.E Page 91 of 751
residents. Implementation of strategic partnerships with the medical community and regional
recreation entities should ensure opportunities for a healthy lifestyle for all people,whether youth or
senior, rich or poo�.As the City evolves and the community changes, police,fire, maintenance, and
volunteer services will continue to be es.sential in making sure Auburn grows together.
----
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 21
ORD.E Page 92 of 751
� Service
We will be an eff.icient,approachable, and responsive Citq govern.ment.
What it wi!l look like;
• In the long-term interest of the Ciry's tax payers and rate payers,the Ciry will construct.and
operate high qualiry infrastructure.
• A transparent, responsive,and competent government and staff that will be proactive,
accessibte,and approachable.
• Residents and businesses will have equal access to and be;highly engaged with City officials
and staff:
� Residents and businesses will be highly engaged through volunteer service.
What it means�
• Infrastructure assets that have a long life, require fiscally sound and environmentally
appropriate upkeep,conform to uniform standards,and are in the best inferest of tax and rate
�p.ayers. :�� ���` ��
,
� Multiple avenues of communicatio�n.�,., - �
• Govemment processes and services that are available ta:alj segments of the population,
through multiple mediums and convenient means. �.
Hoi�y it will happen . � � � � ��
• By continuing to refine a.nd enfocce standards thtat ensure infcastructure assets added to the
City system are of the highest qu,a.lity.
• By utilizing existing and emerging technologies to better communicate, interact and make
,
--� ,
�available fhe�fult��range of�programs and`�ervices.to:.all populations.
• By developing and,`implementing new and different citizen engagement methods including a
citizen civics academy,community and business roundtables,and enhanced social media
communications.
• By capitalizing on partnerships.with the;Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, businesses,developers, non-
profits,faith-based organizations,transit agencies,school districts, Green River College, and
other governmental'agencies.
The Ciry will be judicious with the"resources given by its residents and businesses, and efficient in
managing the budget and resulting services. In order to streamline our business practices,the City
will be forward-thinking, resourceful, innodative, responsive, informed, aware,and considerate of
long-term goals and results.The Ciry, along with ourengaged volunteer, philanthropic, and
business communities,will strive to advance social,fiscal,technological, and infrastructural health:
City of Auburn � C.ore Comprehensive Plan Page 22
ORD.E Page 93 of 751
Economv
We will provide a diverse and vibrant local economy with employment, retail and entertainment
opportunities for citizens and a growing marketplace for local and regional-scale businesses.
What it will look like: -
• 7here will be a range of retail, industrial, manufacturing, and service businesses that start, grow,
and expand in an environment that is conducive to success and corporate community
participation.
• A wide compliment of retail, service and dining options will cater to local needs, attracts visitors
and encourage consistent patronage of local businesses.
• There will be a robust marketplace where people can and want to live, work and play in
Auburn.
What it means�
• Businesses that stay and grow in Auburn, while businesses from other cities, regions,and
states are attraeted to locate and invest he�e.
• Investments in physical amenities and an environment that attracts people to live here, which
includes having attractive, resident-serving-businesses.
• People and goods that move safely and e�ciently throughout the City.
• Increases in sales tax and property tax revenuesfor the City through targeted economic
developmenf and recruitment efforts.
• Targeted employment recruitment to enhance the diversity and ability of employees to shop in
the City.
How it will happen:
• By implementing economic development strategies that focus on investments in our
communiry.
• By developing anci implementing a.,n eeonomic development strategic plan to guide
policymaking and financial i_nvestment decis.ions.
• By facilitating development and attracting businesses that capital.ize on the Ciry's regional
economic amenifies, including, but not limited to,those of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe.
• By making purposeful and strategic investments in public infrastructure and amenities that
further promote the Ciry as an attractive place to invest and do business.
• By maintaining a City quality of service that provides the business communiry with certainty,
support and proactive decision making,
The City will prornote sustainable and diverse ihdustries through multiple means of moving people
and goods and infrastructu�e supporting that m.ovement.The Ciry will also develop policies that
encourage siting of businesses that share mutual benefits,a healthy local and regional
marketplace, innovative industries,and environmentally responsible development patterns that
foster a balanced,flexible,and resilient economy.
City of Auburn � Core Compreherisive Plan Page 23
ORD.E Page 94 of 751
Celebration
We will celebrate diversiry and come together to teach, learn, and have fun.
What it will look like;
• Auburn will have a thriving and expanding arts and culture community.
• There will be events, amenities, and attractions that draw people to congregate and socialize.
• The community is inclusive and proud of its history,social,ethnic,economic,and cultural
diversity in fhe people who live,work and play in Auburn.
What it means-
• People from all parts of Aubum are engaging in both city-wide and neighborhood initiatives.
• Auburn's future is shaped by a broader demographic cross section of its citizenry.
• Event programming ensures that there are opportunities for neighborhoodsand culturesto
celebrate their identity.
Ho w it will happen:
• By developing physical and social infrastructure thaf encourages and enables more people to
p"ractice and showcase their art. - `
• By finding ways to entice new and expanded participation through strategic event planning.
• By utilizing technology to find new audiences and in.crease the amount anci quality of
information distributed. - � ,
• By having a diverse cross-section of property ow,ners, business owners, non-profits,
governments (including tribal),faith-based "organizations, and others who discuss Auburn's
future and take actions to make it their premier communiry.
One of the things tttat makes Aubum special is our diversity; different people have pride in their
culture,while respecfing the differences in othiers.This variety adds strength and sryle to our places
and spaces`.These distinctive places;while often reverential of a specific culture,feel open and
inviting because�there is roorri�foreveryone�. ,.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan . Page 24
ORD.E Page 95 of 751
Eiavironment
We .will protect the natural environment, preserve open space, and create safe and appropriate
access.
What it will look like:
• Residents and visitors will enjoy open spaces and environmentally sensitive areas,while
encouraging the appreciation of their importance and beauty.
• The built environment will respect the natural landscape in a way that protects ecosystem
function.
• Natural resource protection will be supported and celebrated by City leadership and the
community.
What it means�
• Open spaces that are accessible to allow people to connect with the natural environment.
Management of impacts to natural resourcesf.rom new development are.considerate of their
sensitivity and importance.
• The City proactively implements fiseally prudent policies and procedures that are based on
best practices and available science to mitigate and adapt to present and projected future
effects of climate chan.ge.
• Sensitive environmental sites are designated and managed as community environmental
services. -
How it will happen:
• By continuing the application of regulatory tools as an important part of environmental
protection-in order to ensure that new development, redevelopment,land management, and
property,use do:not degrade the environment.
• By iclentifying particularly sensitive properties for;protection through purchase, easement
acquisition,or other means.
• By seeking out opportunities on pubiic and private property for restoration or enhancement of
existing sensitive areas.
• By Ciry leaders a;nd staff placing significant emphasis on policies and financial investments that
protect our naturaf resources. '
• By continued coordination with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe for the identification and
protection of sensitive areas and natural resources important to both the Tribe and the Ciry.
The Ciry will protect and preserve our environmental resources and heritage through responsible
and balanced policies and partnerships.Auburn residents will benefit from environmental
amenities such as parks and urban trails that enable walking and biking throughout our City.The
City's policies will incorporate best pracfices and creative means to balanee current challenges of
environmentally sensitive areas with property rights..
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 25
ORD.E Page 96 of 751
Sustainabilitv
We will balance natural resource protections,economic prosperiry, and cultural vibrancy in order to
build a thriving and long-lasting community.
What it wi1/look like.:
• Natural resource protections, economic prosperity and cultural vibrancy will be continuously
and conscientiously balanced in Ciry policy ancl financial decisions.
The community will be educated,equitable ancl prosperous.
• The Ciry and communi.ry's collecti�e ac.tions will consider future�citizens and the healthy
development of Auburn.
• Auburn is a resilient community. Its neighborhoods, irifrastrucfu.re, and economy thrive and
remain healthy in the face of global climate c.hange and its assac_iated effects,
• Cultu�al d.iver5ity will be supported and strengttiened th.rough the City's policies,financial
practices,and pol.icy irriplementation action."s. '
What it irmeans�
�
• Citizens, business owners, government, non-profits,and a development communiry that
promote and implement practices that contribute to an environmentally-responsible Auburn.
• City leaders and staff that are committed'to implementation of policies that consider both short-
term and long-term economic,social, and environmental conditions and effects.
• The City will have dev�loped and implemented action plans thaT id'entify and achieve
sustainability goals`and objectives�. � �
How it will happen.:
• By Ciry leaders-adopting sustainability in its broatlest meaning as a core value and function of
Auburn`s tlelivery.of,l,o.cal government services.
• By City leaders confinually and eonsciously creating policies, actions and st�ategies that�eflect
the communiry's values. ' � .
• By inviting citizens and busi;nesses to'�participate i�n the development and i�mplementation of
Auburn's sustainability strategi;es,and challenging them to embrace sustainability in their .
individual and collective actions.
,
To ensure healthy Auburn for future generations,we must consider long-lasting effects of our
aetions on community healtFi,economic viability,the environment, and issues of equity.This
means embraeing change through iriclusivity and balancing current and future needs.
__ _-- _ _- - - ---
Gity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 26
ORD:E Page 97 of 751
Policy Elements
Policy Elements in the Comprehensive Plan provide a finer level of detail for different subject areas.
Policy E.lements are an extension of the Core Plan and are designed to implement the broad goals,
policies and actions contained herein. Furthermore, the Policy Elements reflect the vision and
values enumerated in the Core Plan. Specific Policy Elements are listed as follows:
Land Use Policy Element
Housing Policy Element
Capital Facil.ities Policy Eiement
Utilities Policy Element
Transportation Policy Element
Economic Development Policy Element ,
Parks and Open Space Policy Element
In this section each Policy Element is identified and described. The Core Plan provides the
foundation upon which each Policy Element is built by including. .Broad goals that relate to each
value, as well as general policies and actions that wilf guide us to our vision of Auburn in 2035 are
also included in the following descriptions.
Gity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 27
ORD.E Page 98 of 751
Land Use Folicy Element
Goals:
1. Character: Buildings and developments are planned and constructed using innovative
architectural and site layout techniques that emphasize social interaction and safety.
2: Wellness: Residential, commercial,and recreational areas of the City are joined by a
system of trails and paths so that there is less reliance upon the use of v.ehic.les.
3. SerVice: Citizens are aware of the City's vision, have_access to policies and information,
and feel that they have a voice in the outcome of future land use proposals.
4. Economv:There is a robust mix of uses and options that make living,working and
shopping in Aubum desirable.
5. Celebration; Neighborhoods and districts have been idenfified and are distinguishable
through the use of signs, marketing materials,and sub area plans: ,
6. Environment: Our rivers,streams,wetlands, habrtats and other natural>resou�ces are
identified, preserved and protected for futu�e generations.
7. Sustainabilitv: L.and use activities and developments incorporate low impact
development,crime prevention through enyironmental design,and othersustainable
development practices.
Land Use Description: .
The Land Use Policy Element'isthe focal element of this Plan that is then supported by all
other elernents of,the Plan. It il.lustrates where the community should or shoul.d not
: ,
_
° develop,the anticipated scale and intensity of deyelopment, and how various land use.s
relate to each othec The Land Use Element lays the foundation for what the community
will look like, how it will change and,g'row,and where different types of fand activities w'ill be
established. `
Aubum's overall existing land use pattem is checKered,somewhat random and
d..isconnected, Much of this is due to the manner in which Aubum has e..xpan.ded in the I.ast
20 years. The annexation of Lakeland Hills absorbed what became a community with wide
landscaped thoroughfares, contemporary architecture, and a more affluent demographic.
The West Hill and Lea Hill annexations brought relatively rural lands with a wide mix.of
residential densities and rural levels of infrastructure, where residents feel a st�onger
attacFimerit to commercial centers located outside of Auburn. To the southeast,Aubum
transitions into a community with an entirely different charactec. The area along Auburn
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 28
ORD.E Page 99 of 751
Way South passes back and forth between the Ciry of Auburn and the Muckleshoot
Reservation. To the southwest and north,Auburn is a mix of auto centnc commercial
corridors, light industrial/warehousing, and aging single family homes. Historic downtown
Auburn has a more urban appearance with a traditional main street, regional transit center,
and vast opportunity to become a vibrant and walkable city center.
The existing land use pattern is also greatly influenced by the presence of major highways,
rail lines, physical land forms and natural features. The Green River,White River, Highway
18, Highway 167, bluffs of West Hill,slopes of Lea H.i.11, and Burlington Northern and Union
Pacific rail lines provide both opportunities and barriers, They serve as landmarks when
identifying neighborhoods,obstacles for connecting the community, preservation corridors,
and marketing features.
Lea Hill: Lea Hill is bound by the Green River, Highway 18, S. 277th St:,and Kent. Much of
this area was annexed into Auburn in 2008. It includes Green River College,a relatively
small commercial center; a golf course,several sehools,and a mix of low density rutal uses
intermixed with traditional suburban residenfial developments. During the Imagine Aubum
visioning exercise Lea Hill residents indicated that they desi';re more parks and t:rails,access
to more neighborhood scale businesses, and safe� .n,eighborhoods. Lea Hill residents have
a stronger connection to Kent and Covi'rigton d'ue to both perception and reality that
commercial seivices are mo�e expansive and convenient at these locations. The Bridges
subdivis.ion is an island in ttie:micidle of Lea Hill that is within the incorporated city limits of
Ke nt.
(lnsert MaP)
West Hill: West Hill is bound by Wesf Valley Highway,51st Ave S, and permanently
protected agricultural lands:. It is comprised of different scales of residential development.
and lacks commercial services. West Hill residents have a stronger connecfion to Federal
Way due to the perception that commercial services are more expansive and convenient at
these locations.
(/nsei-t Map)
Lakeland Hills: Lakeland Hills is partially within King County and partial�y with.i.n Pierce
Counry. lt is bound by West Valley Highway,Kersey Way, the White River, Lake Tapps, and
Sumner. The majority of Lakeland HiUs is comprised of a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
that has a commercial center and a mix of single family homes,townhomes,and some
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 29
ORD.E Page 100 of 751
apartments. Additionally,there are undeveloped areas of Lakeland Hilis that are outside of
the PUD that consist of a mix of traditional residential subdivisions and rural lands.
Lakeland Hills residents have a strong association with their own community,as well as
Bonney Lake and Sumner to the south, Intemally, it is a well-connected community where
residents have good access to trails and several parks. However; it is not well-connected to
a.reas outside of Lakeland Hills. L.akeland Hills has a very limited amount of affordable
housing,senior housing,and multi-.family housing.
(lnsert Map)
Downtown Auburn: Downtown Auburn is characterized by a traditional Main Street that is
bisected by major cocridors such as M Street;Auburn Way,Aub.urn Avenue, Division Street,
C Street, and the Interurban Trail. It is comprised of a mix of new and old commercial
buildings and uses,several civic buildings and uses, a regional transit center, a regional
medical centec,and Auburn Hi,gh Sehool. Dow,ntown Au,buln offers immense opportunity
for a wa.(k.able, mixed-use center with easy access to Sound Transit. There are several
public spaces that are interspersed throughout dov�intawn that can be used for
celebrations,events,and displays.�'.
� � � � � (lnserl Ma,�) �
North Auburn° .North Auburn is bound by S.:277th St.,Wesf Valley Highway,the Green
River, and fhe Downtown,Urban Center. Thepprimary corridors of Aubum Way North,
`_ . ,-
Harvey Road,and 15th Sireet NW/NE are pnmanly auto centric commercial thoroughfares.
V1/est.Valley Highway;A Street NE/B Street NW;and 37th Street NW/NE are the City's
_ principal warehousing and light iridustrial corridors: I Street NE serves as an alternative
north south route fora nurnber of residential communities. Significant features in this
communiry include the Auburn Way North auto mall and the Auburn Environmental Park.
Interspersed throughout North Auburn are a number of residential communities, most of
which are between 40 and 100 years of age, with a few recently developed subdivisions.
(lnsert Map)
South Auburn: S.outh Auburn is bound by the Downtown Urb.an Center,West Valley
Highway,Algona, the White River,Auburn Way South and M Street SE. The pnmary
corridors of Auburn Way South, 15th Street SW,and A Street SE are primarily auto centric
retail and service commercial thoroughfares. West Valley Highway and C Street SW are
primarily light industrial and warehousing corridors. Significant features in this community
CityofAuburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 30
ORD.E Page 101 of 751
are the Les Gove Community Park campus,the Outlet Collection, Game Farm Park, Boeing,
Region 10 headquarters for the Federal GovernmenYs General Services Administration and
Social Security Administration, BNSF's Rail Yard, as well as the interchange of Highway 18
and Highway 167. During Imagine Auburn,feedback focused primarily on the need to
address crime and safety.
(lnsert Map)
Southeast Auburn; Southeast Auburn begins at the base of the hill where Auburn Way
South climbs to the Muckleshoot Casino and extends out to the Aubum Adventist Academy.
This area is bound by the White River to the south and the Green River and bluffs to the.
north. Auburn Way South is the primary corndor through this area, which weaves in and
out of the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation. While the properties along Auburn Way South
are primarily auto-centric commercial uses,-the corridor is f(anked by a number of
residential corrimunities that are located immediately behi'nd the business,es. During
Imagine Auburn, residents expr.essed concern over the high volume of traffic through this
cor.ridor as visitors travel to the Wfiite River Amphitheater just outside of the Giry. There
were additional traffic conce.rris during commute hoursas'people travel south towards
Enumclaw. Citizens also expressed unease o�er the appearance of Auburn Way South.
(/nsert Map)
Land Use Categories
Residential: The Residential land use category will include several rypes of residential
Zoning designations ranging from low density areas with significant environ.mental
constraints or that lack urban infra"structure to high densiry multi-family designations where
the goal is to intensify and densify p"opulation. Residenfial land use designations will be
comprised ofa diverse arrangement of mulfiple densifies where a patte.rn of mixed
densities are preferred over a single densiry throughout the zone or neighborhood. This will
be accomplished 6y allowing greater density in exchange for the incorporation of high
quality and innovative architectural design, greater neighborhood connectivity,
compatibility with the natural environment,installation of community amenities,crime
prevention through environmental design, and techniques that ensure compatibiliry
between other uses and communities.
Commercial: The Commercial land use category will include zoning designations that
provide a wide range ot retail, entertainment,and service uses and activities. Zoni.ng
designations within this category will range from auto-centri.c corridors to pedestrian and
transit oriented mixed use dist�icts. When defining zoning boundaries and developing
City of Auburn � Core Gomprehensive Plan Page 31
ORD.E Page 102 of 751
strategies,attention will be given to the appropriateness of the types of uses and activities,
the bulk and scale of developments, compatibility with surrounding actiyities and the
enVironment,accessibility and connectiviry, and cons.istency with the City's economic
development objectives,
Industrial: Ttie Industrial land use category will inc.lude zoning de5ignations that provide
an opportuniry for warehousing, distribution,transportation, ligfit industrial,storage and
manufactunng uses. Despite the traditional perception of how these types of uses look and
function,zoning designations and development standards,will reinforce that it is equally
important that these areas remain att�active in t.heir appea�ance and that they be
connected by adequate moto�ized, non-motorized and multi-modal transportation
infrastructure. '
Public/Institutional: The Public and Institutional land use catego,ry will include zoning
designations for open space, public spaee, and,preserved lands, Properties such as parks,
environmentally protected areas,significant'utiliry properties and corridors,and institutional
uses will be located within the zoning designatiflns of this'Jand use catego .ry: Zoning
designations will distinguish between acfive public parks where people.a�e encouraged to
congregate;passive areas intended to be left undistutbed;and uses such as schools and
fire stations. Due to the nature of the rypes'of uses and activifies allowed within this
category; zoning boundaries tend to be drawn a�ound individual properties or a small
collection of properties. �� �
Special Planning'Areas: Special Planning Areas are districts within the City where a Plan
has been developed,\adopted,`and incorporated into fhe Comprehensive Plan. A Special
_ __ ,
Planning Area may function as an overlay that is.supplemental to the underlying zoning
�designation or�as a ceplacement of the underiying land u.se ca.tegory and zoning
designation. Special Planning Areas serve a purpose that seeks to enhance economic
development opportun,ities,environmental protection,or master planned developments.
Overlays: Overlay"s are supplemental to the underlyirig land use category a.nd zoning
designation. O�erfays provide supplemental policy language for u�ban separators,
impression corrid.ors,gafew.ays, and potential annexation areas. Overlays are delineated
and assigned because there a�e extraordinary circumstances that warrant additional ancJ
specialized planning emphasis in a particular area of the City.
Land Use Policies;
1. Require 6uildi,ng design standards for multi-family, mixed use, and non-.residential
structures to ensure unique and high qualiry architectural forms,shapes and materials..
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 32
ORD.E Page 103 of 751
2. Require site design standards for multi-family, mixed use, commercial and residenfial
development proposals that provide connectivity b.etween and through sites,adequate
public gathering spaces,sustainable development practices, and efficient provision of
utilities and streets.
3. Engage in strategic planning of identified corridors and gateways which include an
emphasized level of planning;designing, improving, regulating,and maintaining those
areas that provide the most visible impressiqn of Aubu.rn.
4. Delineate neighborhoods and districts and develqp st�ategie.s for ereating greater
neighborhood identity that reinforces the concept of"One Auburn".
5. Identify commercial, residential and reereational destinations that should be joined by
paths and trails with the overall goal of creating a citywide infrastructure that is fully
connected.
6. Develop downtown Auburn into a safe,walkable community,that has attractive public
plazas and buildings,and an engaging streetscape through planning', regulation, and
capital improvements.
7. Identi,fy, protect, preserve and restore Auburn's env.i.ronment and natural resources..
8, Implement rpeasures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
9, Develop vehiculargateways into Auburn i'nto vuell signed,attractive and prominent
entry points.
10. Establish sign controls that reduce sign clutter and strive for a long term outcome
where attractive buildings,thoughtful sign design, and vegetation domi'nate the
landscape instead of poorly placed and designed signs.
11. Establish parking standards that limit the overall number of spaces and. where
landscaping and site layoutsoftens the visual impact of large parking lots.
12. Incentivize good community iiesign by al]owing increased height, density, intensity and
other standarcls.
13. Ensure harmonious transition between land uses and zoning designations through the
use of setbacks, �egetation, building orientation, or architectural design.
14. Employ Crime Prevention through Enviconmental Design (CPTED)when designing
commun.ities a.nd developriment proposals.
15. Support efforts and programs such as neighborhood watch, national night ouf, and
other aetivities that bring resitlents together.
_ _ . _ ...__ . __
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 33
ORD.E Page 104 of 751
i �_�- g � �
�.�M1., .�.' . {c.!.r�� �. a . (j 7�.ri��'�'��� � '� . �� , i7 �� � m,���T��"' � �Y
�s.}�' �.s'h a� ��_ � '�e�, �', � � �'3� ..,u.n.. � s��`�
...�,4.�...�
_ � _ � ._�_: __ .__ ___ ._...__
Short Term,(2016 thru 2018) ;s � � ,, ,- �^
_ _ . _ . . . e a_ _s . . �_- __
_ - -_ _
1. Update city zoning and develop.me.nt regulationsto be CDPW- Ciry Council,
consistent with the Core Plan and Land Use Policy Community Planning
Element. Development Commission,
Mayor's Office,Ciry
Attorney
2. Update the ciry zoning and development regulations to CDPW- Ciry Council,
be consistent with National Pollution Discharge Gommuniry Planning
Elimination System requirements. Development; Commission,
, CDPW-Public Mayor's Office,Ciry
Works Attorney
3. Implement the recommendations of the Main Street ' CDPW- �. Mayor's Office,
Urban Design Plan. Communiry :. CDPW-Public
Development Works,Downtown
Association,
Gharriber of
Commerce,
Business and
Property Owners
_ _ - -- -_ _ - _ ..
- -
4. Prepare an Auburn VNay South Corridor Improvement CDPY1/-; Mayor's Office,State
Plan. � � ,. Corriii�uni4y � Department of
. Development, Transportati.on,
-
CDPiN-Public Business,MIT,and
� Works Property Owners
5. Develop a connectivirystrategy,thaflays the foundation CDPW- Mayor's Office,
focjoining commercial,residential and,�ecreation`al :_, Communiry Parks,Utiliry
:areas:� -� � � pevelopr�ent, Provider's
GDPW.-Public
Works
6. Update the`City'sGreenhouse Gas Inventory and CDPW- All City Departments
Climate Action Plan Environmental
- _ -- - - --� - -- - - - -
Services
. _ _ - - - _ _ . _� __ _ _ _
7. Develop a Sustainabiliry Element of the Cornprehensive CDPW- All Ciry Departrnents
Plan. � Environmental
Services
8. Continue ongoing support to the Ciry's Neighborhoods Mayor's Office All Ciry Departments
program and utilize the program to strengthen
relationships between neighborhoods and the Ciry.
Moiterate Tecm(2019 thru;2Q25)
_ �.. . � ___.
9. Identify neighborhoods and develop strategies for CDPW- Mayor`s Office
promoting awareness. Communiry
Deve.l.opment
10. Develop and implement a cirywide greenhouse gas CDPW- All Ciry Departments
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 34
ORD.E Page 105 of 751
reduction plan. Environmental
Services
11. In 2021,update Land Use Policy Element: CDPW- Ciry Council,
Community Planning
Development Commission,
Mayor's Office,Ciry
Attorney
_._ __ -
- -. _ _ _
12. In 2022,update ciry zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- Ciry Couhcil,
w'ith update to Land Use Policy Element Community Planning
pevelopment Commission,
Mayor's Office,City
Attorney
__. .___.: . .
Long Term(2026 thru 2035) �
.._ _ _ _. _ _
13. In 2028,update Land Use Policy Element. CDFW
Housing Policy Element
Goals:
1. Gharacter:Trails, public spaces and outdoor amenities are available which promote
social interaction, safety, and healthy lifestyles.
2. Wellness: B"uildings and propeities are ma..naged to provide a healthy enviconment and
the surrounding landscape is maintained and feels safe.
3. Service; Social and human services that aid in the provision of housing for those in
need are supported by the communiry.
4. Economy: Residential communities are well designed and connected to non-motorized
paths and transit seryice so that residents can afford to shop and work close to home.
5. Celebration: Residents feel a sense of pride and neighborhood,identity while promoting
the idea of"One Auburn".
6. Environment: Housing is integrated into the natural environment.
7. Sustainable:Adequate and dispersed housing is provided to seniors,the`disabled,low
income,and all other individua4s.and families.
Housing Description: _
A sustainable communiry offe,rs a range of fiousing types by providing opportunities for
people to choose and to afford to live near jobs,shopping, and services. This rype of
outcome,.enables shorter trips,`the use of alternative transportation, red.uctions i,n traffic
ccingestion, improved qualiry of life,and the economic benefit of resi.dents choosing to
spend their income in Auburn` Because we,believe that there is strength in diversity,it is a
priority to support and enable a robust mix of housing types. Dispersed and extensive
housing options enable all segments of society to make choices about where they want to
live in Au6am rather than feeling forced to reside in other communities.
Creating the opportunity to establish or retain housing stock for seniors and populations
who have social, health�and human service needs is particularly important. Housing data
demonstrates that Auburn already has a wide range of housing types and housing costs.
But as a significant portion of the population ages,fhere will be an increasing demand for
senior housing. While Aubutn alrea.dy h..as a wide range of this housing type,it is not
dispersed throughout the City. Specific.ally,there are very few senio�,affordable,or lower
income housing options in Lakeland Hills or West Hill,very few senior options on Lea Hill,
a.nd a concentration of senior and low income options in the.Valley.
___ _ . _.. -----—_ . _ _._ __ _ _. _
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 36
ORD.E Page 107 of 751
The preservation and renewal of older neighborhoods is an important consideration for
retaining a mix of housing types,as well as community character and history. Auburn's
housing stock is older and much of the rental housing stock is in fair to poor condition.
While Auburn is not proactively seeking to eliminate affordable housing, there is a reality
that some of the housing stock is at the end of its life. There must be a conscious effort to
understand and identify which properties are at the end of useful life and which properties
have renovation potential. Perhaps most importantly, the Ciry must ensure that
redevelopment and renovation does not result in a wholesale loss of affordable housing
stock.
Auburn's average and median household size suggests that there is a need to provide
housing for both small and large households. A"uburn's average household size is 2.67
compared to 2.40 in King Countyand 2.59 in Pierce County,while ouraverage family size is
3.22 as compared to 3.05 and 3.09 in King and Pierce Counties, respectively. While these
average figures are higher than our neighbors,we also have a higher percentage of single
parents with children. These data strengthen the conclusion that there is a need for less
traditional housing,which include accessory dwelling u,nits, cottage housing,townhouses,
apartments, and condominiums. Housing data, national trends, and City experience also
conclude that we will likely see increasing demands for larger houses that accommodate
multi-generational families living together.
Housing Policies
1. Residential neighborhoods and buildings will be designed and maintained to support
Safe and active living that isconnected to multimodal transportation opfions.
2. Support efforts to retain and create more types of housing with a broader mix of
affordability in all of Auburn's residential and mixed use neighborhoods.
3. Implement and promote measures that enhance public safetysuch as neighborhood
watch, crime prevention through environmental design, and expanded access to law ,
enforcement resources.
4. Organize actions fhat influence and incentivize the retention and maintenance of the ,
existing housing stock and their surrounding environs. I�
5. Implement strategies fhat lead to the adequate provision of dispersed affordable
housing for moderate, low,and very-low income.hou.seholds and residents in need.
6. Support efforts that are intended to connect human, health,and social services to
residents in need.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 37
ORD.E Page 108 of 751
7. Develop and support programs that fielp inforrim residents of their options, available
services, ancl rights to healthy and affordable housing.
8. Strengthen ou�partnerships with other agencies and communities to help bolster and
steady the supply of housing options and supportive services so that there is greater
equiry in the region.
9: Monitor spatial and quantitative trends in housing supply;affordability, and diversity for
Auburn and other King and Pierce County municipalities a.nd mak.e appropriate policy,
regulatory and programmatic adjustments in response to data findings.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 38
ORD.E Page 109 of 751
"s k € t�w����:.€i€ -�� 3�� � e r*E -� . z�� � "�� k� _
����t�� �' � �3a.��a ���€�I tE€, a. ��.� �� .3..���.
�ahc�rt Term�(2a16 thru 2018} ��'' �
�
. , � � �� �__ �, �_ . _,..... __�Y �a..�
1. Develop a monitoring program that defines the tools CDPW- Police,King County,
and metrics that describe housing condition,supply, Communiry Pierce Counry
availabiliry,location,crime rates;and housing type. Devefopment
_.-�--------- — - -- —
2. Evaluate ciry zoning regulations to ensure that CDPW- Ciry Couneil,Planning
aceessory dwelling units,clusfered,housing,cottage Cqmmunity Commission,Mayor's
housing,townhouses,etc.are allowed within Development Office,Ciry Aftorney
appropriate residential and mixed use zones.
__ _-- - _ __ .
_.... -__ _- -
3. Utilize the existing city rental housing business license CDPW- CDPW-Business and
program and requirements to educate mulfi-fam'ily Gorrimaniry Budget,Police,Multi-
property owners abqut Auburn's gqals,policies and Development Family Properry
standards and that.holds property owners and tenants . ' Owners
accountable for adherenee to its objectives.
- . _ _ -_- -. __ . _..
. _ - __.
4. Gontinue the Ciry's housing home repair program and Administration:- CDPVN-Communiry
seek ways to expand its use. Neighborhood ` Developmeot
Serr'rces ' ,
Modera`te Term(2019 t�ru'202s'`� �_ Ky_'. , ,
5. B nei hborhoo.d,�inventory�housing,oppartunities for � GDPW- � King County,Pier
y g ce
seniors,moderate income,low income,very,low Gornmuniry Counry
income,and persons with disabilities. Develfop Development
conclusions that can be used to identify areas that are
in need of specific housing types.
6. Work with transit agencies to determine multi;modal CDPW-Public Sound Transit,MIT,
transportation needs,routes,fu,nding and capital Works,CDPW- Metro, Pierce TransiT
improvements necessary to serve pnoriry areas. ` Communiry
Development
__ . . _..,__ -- _ _
_ _ __ - , - .__ _
7. De�elop a joint Muekleshoot/Auburn housing GDRW- City Council,Tribal
inventory and needs'assessment`that is used to ` Com,munity Council,King Counry,
� ..
estab�ish gqals and strategies that combine our Development,MIT Pierce County
resources'f�or niutual benefif:'- �
--- --- __ .
-
8. In 2021,update Housing Pol'icy.Element based upon CDPW- City Council,Planning
findings and ciata collected in the monitoring program. Community Commission,Mayo�'s
Development Office,Ciry Attorney
- -_ __ ,__:_ _ __ . _
9: In 2022,update ciry zaning�egulations fo be consistent CDPW- Ci.ry Cou.ncil,.Planning
with update to Housing Policy Element� Commun.i_ry Commission,Mayor's
Deyelopment O.ffice,City Attorney
tcing�T�rm(��26 thru 2Q35):. -
p�, _. .�.. . � w �.�� s. . _ ��.._� �e. ._ _�..,. ..
10. In 2028,update Housing Policy Element based upon CDPW- Ciry Councd,Planning
findings and data collected in fhe monitoring program. Communiry Commission,Mayor's
Development Office,City Attorney
11. In 2029,update cityzoning regulationsto be consistent CDPW- Ciry Council,Planning
with update to Housing Policy Element Comrnunity Commission,Mayor's
Development Office,Ciry Aftorney
_ _ _._ .
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 3"9
ORD.E Page 110 of 751
Capital Facilities_P_olicy Element
Goals;
1. Character: Our capital investments have been strategically deployed and have resulted
in a targeted mix of streets, parks,amenities and trails that.serve the majority of
communities.
2. Wellness: Capital faciliry planning,budgeting, design and construction incorporate
principles and concepts that promote a healfhy lifestyl�.:
3. Service: Revenue sources and budget allocations have been identified that suppqrt.
both the constructign, provision, and on-going high quality maintena.nce of ca.pital
facilities and publ,ic services. � `"
4. Economv: Our capital facilities a�e a marketing asset that causes businesses and
residents to seek opportunities to locate.here: _
5. Celebration:We design,construct, and utilize our parks and streets so that we can
� gather on holidays�, listen Ya�rnusic,attend parades,erivatch rriovies,viev�r��rt, obse'rve
nature, and e�njoy o,ther comriiunity events. �
6. Environment: Capital improvements are�designed vand constructed in a manner that
employs a high�r"s�andard fharr ih�e minimurvi rEquired�underthe law.
e, ;
,.� ;.s e.
7. Sustainable:We hav�,fully implemented a capitaf investment philosophy t.h.at values the
long term outcome overttie sho.rt term expense.
�
� ��,�
� �_ �. � _� �
� �,��
Capital�Fac�lities�•Descnptipn,' �
�,�,
Capital facilities afe those facilities that are owned and ope�ated by the City. The Capital.
Faeil,ities Pol,icy Elernent,is made up of a collection of documents that i.ncl:ude the City's 6-
Year�apital Facilities Plan,the Comp,rehensive Water Plan,the Comprehensive Sewer
Plan,th�e ��mprehensivE Stormwater Drainage Plan,and the Capital Facilities�Plans for
each school district and fhe Valley Regional Fire Authority. Additionally, although the Parks
.
and Recreation,Policy Element and the Transportation Policy Element are standalone -
� _.
docu_ments,they taa are a component of the Capital Fa.cil.ities Plan because t:hey include
m.. _ .
both short.and long term in.vestments in developing and maintaining City-owned#aci.lities.
The provision and sizing of facilities,such as utilities and streets,can influence the�ate,
tim.i_ng, and ability for growth and developrnent that occurs withi:n the Ciry. Timed provision
of facilities als.o ensu.res that new development can be assimilated i:n.to the ezisting
community without serious disruptions or adverse impacts:. This plan establishes policies
to alloriv development only when and where all public facilities are adequate or can be
_ . _._ __ __ - -- --- -- - --
__ _ _
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Flan Rage 40
ORD:E Page 111 of 751
made adequate, and only when and where such de.velopment can be adequately served
by public facilities and services consistent with adopted level of sefyice sta..nda�ds,
Fublicfacilities include public utilities, streets, parks, municipal buildings, fire and police
seruiees, teehnology and communication systems, K-12 school systems, and waste and
recycling services.
Capital Facilities Policies:
1. Development will only be permitted where there is a positive determination that
concurrency and level of service standards have been rnet. Levels of service shall be
established within,or by way of, each capital facilities document and/or Policy Element.
2: Lands designated for urban growth shall have Urban levels qf public facilities prior to,or
concurrent with, deyelopment. If adequate pub.lic fa.cilities tlo not exist and public funds
are not committed,propqsed development activities must provide such facilities at their
own expense.
3. New connections to the City's sanitary sewer, water,`and/or storm drainage systems,
shall contribute their fair share toward fhe construction and/or financing.of future or on-
going projects to increase the capacity of those systems.
4. The City will coordinate with other:utility purveyors within the City of Auburn to snsure
that adequate facilit�es".exist or are pfanned in under"served areas. Other utility
comprehensive plans are not incorporafed into the Cornprehensive Plan un.less the.�e is.
a specific City Couneil action t_o aceept aqd adopt.
5. The C�ty will coordinate with solid waste providers and Ki:ng County to ensure that there
is adequate and mandatory waste and recycling serviee provided throughout Auburn.
The City will continue to create, support, and implement efforts that expand recycling
and`re-use.
6. The City:will coordinate with each school district and their capital facility planning
efforts. A school district'capital facility plan is not incorporated into the Comprehensive ',
Plan unless there is a specifie Gify Council action to accept and adopt. I
7. The City will coordinate,with Valley Regional Fire Authority and their capital facility
planning efforts. A fire capital facility plan is not incorporated into the Comprehensive
Plan unless there is a specific City Council acfion to accept and adopt.
8. The Ciry will implement the adopted Auburn Airport Master Plan.
9. The Ciry will seek opportunities to incorporate trails and public spaces as general
fundi:ng for these al)ow in its capital facility projects.
City of Autiurn � Core Compre}iensive Plan Page 41
ORD.E Page 112 of 751
_ _ _
10. Sustai:nabl.e development p�actices will be incorporated into capital facility project
design and constru:ction.
11. The siting, design,construction, and improvement of all public facilitiesshall be done in
full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).
3 � „ � � � �
� � �� , , :� $
�'� � � �� �� � � � �� � ��
��4_ � � � � a� � � � �� � � � 3 � �;�� ^
� �- �I.�� ��' 3 „u �:� �.-.1�
�ki+�rtTett�1�2E316 thru 2018) . : ' ` � '� �
�
���, , �� �. � v
�
1.� Implement6-year Capital Improvement Plansfor CDPW-Public Ciry Gouncil,Planning
water,sewer,and storm drainage. Works ' Commission;Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW=Community
Development
_ ,. _
2. Implement 6-year Gapital Improvement Plans far CDPW-Public Ciry Council,Planning
Transportation�. Works Comrriission,Ivlayor's�
� Office,Ciry Attorney,
, � GDPW-Communi.ty
Development
3. Incorporate Low Impact Development(LIDj into Giry .� GDPW-Public City Council,Planning
� Cotles and Standards by January 1;2017.� ` Works Commission,Mayor's
� Offi'ce,City Attorney, �
� - �� CDPW-Corrimuniry
� Development
�tlradera,t�T�rr»(�t?1�tl�ru 2U25} �� '� ` �
�..
,��.� ��, �� ��.� � _�.
�4. Im leme'nt�7�to 10.year C�apital=linpro.veme �� � � �.� � � � ���
p nt'Ptans for CDPYN-Public City Council,Planning
water,sewer,and sCorm.drainage. Works Commission,Mayor's
�` Office,City Attorney,
-. � ,. v, �
��� CDPW.=Communi_ry
pevelopmeot
� . �_ � _.
�5. Im�l�me'nt lon'ger term�Gapital Irriprowgment Plans for CDPW-Fublic Ciry Council,Pl�anning
Transpcsrfafion Works Commission,Mayor's
; �::
Office,City Attomey,
CDPW-Community
Development
� �k - — � -� � - �
- -- ---- ---- - m m. _ _. --- _ ---- -- --- --- -- --- -_-- -_ --
6. In 2021,update Cap[tal�acrlities Policy Element. CDPW-Public City Council, Planning
Works,Parks Commission,Mayor's
Off.ice,Ciry.Aftorney,
CDPW-Communiry
Development
7. In 2022,upclate ciry zoning regulations to be consistent. CpPW-Publie Ciry Council,Plaqning
with update to Gapital Facilities Policy Element Works,Parks Commission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Gommuniry
Development
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 42
ORD.E Page 113 of 751
_
Long Term(2026 thru 2035) ` .
_.
8. fmplement 10 to 20 ye.a.r Capital Improvement Pians CDPW-Public Ciry Council,Planning
for water,sewer,and storm drainage. Works Commission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Atforney,
CDPW-Communiry
Development
9. In 2028,update Capital Facilities Policy Element. CDPW-Public Ciry Council,Pl.anning
Works, Parks Commission,Mayor's
Office,City Attorney,
CDPW-Community
- - ---_ _ - - _
Development
_ _ � ..__ _
10. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CQRV1[-Publie Ciry Council,Planning
with update to Capital Facilities Policy Element Works,parks Com.mission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Community
Development
,
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 43
ORD.E Page 114 of 751
Utilities Policy Element
Goals
1. Character. Utility corndors serve multi-purpose functions such as non-motorized
connectivity and recreational amenities.
2: Wellness:The extension and provision of utiliry service extends throughout the entire
community who has access to safe and reliable utility service.
3. Service: Re.sidents and businesses ha.ve a.ccess to all forms of reliable utility senrice
including communication, wate�,sewer,and storrn systems.
4. Economy:Through planning,franchise agreernents and partnerships, capital
improvements are occurring in conjunction with development and redevelopment.
5. Celebration:Technology and amenities:are in place that support community events and
enhance awareness and accessibility that results in broader participation.
6. Environment:Utility users are leaders in the region and have emb�aced and deployed
alternative energy solutions and conservation rneasures.
7. Sustainable: New development fully pays for utility extensions and upgrades that are of
a qualiry that is in the best long term inte�est of the Ci.ty and avoids ratepayer subsidies.
Utilities Description: \
The primary responsibility of planning for pnvate utilities rests with th.e utiliry providers. Clearly,
this planning_cannot take place�without_open lines.of communication between the Ciry and the
utiliry-�proViders:_ �� �� �
Puget Sound Energy(PSE)provides electrical and natural gas service to most of the City of
Auburn. PSE is an investor-owned private utility,which provides service to approximately 1.2
million cusfomers in aservice area fhat covers 6,000 square miles. With respect to electrical
service, PSE builds;;operates,and maintains an electrical system consisting of generation,
transmission, and distribution facilities.
The Northwest Pipeline Corporation and Enumclaw Gas also have gas lines in the
southeastern po.rtion of the Ciry. While the Northwest Pipeline Corporation does not serve any
customers within the Ciry, Enumclaw Gas has sorime residenti.al customers in the area of the
Adventist Academy..
Conventional local telephone senrice to the Ciry is provided by CenturyLink. CenturyLink offers
serviee to 2b million customers in 14 western states. The facilities in which calls are switched
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 44
ORD.E Page 115 of 751
are call central offices. Typically there are fqur main li.nes heading out from each eentral office
-one in each direction. Auburn's central office is located in downtown Auburn. Long distance
service is provided in the area by se�eral,providers. Tliese providers have underground fiber
optic cables passing through ihe City of Auburn.
Cel.lular telecommunications provide mobile telephone. Cellular communication companies
offer digital voice, messaging and high speed wireless data services to customers. There are
several cellular service providers with customers and facilities in the Ciry of Auburn. Regulation
of cellular providers is provided by the Federal Communications.Commission (FCC).
Cable:television service is provided by Comcast through a cambination of aerial and
underground cables. Several satellite dish companies also provide service within the City but
�_
_ 1
facilities are limited to the satellite dishes affixed to homes. The Cify is,cu:rrently negotiating
with Century L.ink on a potential cable franchise.
I.nvestor-owned util_ities in the State.,,of Washington a�e,regufated by the Washington Utilities
and Transportation Commission (WUTC).. State law regulates charges,services, facilities, and '
practiees of utilities., Any changes in policies,°regarding th�seaspects of utility provision require
WUTC approval. � �� � ��
Private utilities inclucle`electriciry,,telecomrnunicatians, natural gas, and non-city owned sewer,
,
and water.
Utilities�PoEieieS: ...
1. Private utility cornpanies should strive to provide utility services to all segments of the
Auburn population and areas of the community.
2, All new util.ity and telecommunication lines shall be located underground within all new
develop`rne.nts. The City,will also work with utility companies to relocate existing
distribution,service and telecommunication lines underground as a part of system
upgrades, urban revitalization,and ci.ty capital projects whenever it is economically and
teclinqlcjgically feasible.
3. The.visual impaet of private uti.lities shall be mitigated through undergrounding,
colocation,screening, or other mitigation techniques. Views from private property;
rights of way,and the surrounding community shall be considered when mitigating
visual impact.
_ .�_
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan � Page 45
ORD.E Page 116 of751
4. When granting franchise agreements,right of way permits,and other city approvals to
utility p�oyiders, edidence sliall be provided that docurnents sustainable development
practices that wil.l be incorporated into const:ruction activities.
� � �� �� � �. r � : � �
� �
��'�� � ��� �� �[ ,�� � � ���� ��
� +�
<
. ��
.,u... [.€�.sa�s+s� �..r'..... :'�,n � . ,�'u� �. ' �: .,� :r �...� �s� � �i�����.
'��IOE CTk?!'it'1�d�.�7r'�'1FLI���� �. — ' ��� � —
��.... ,,4_�s , _�._e. � „ � _ � . _. o �
1. Explore opportunities to enhance the use of franchise CDPW-Publie IV(ayor's Office,City
fees and taxes. Works,Finanee Attorney,IT
—. . _ _..- - - - _ _ - — - -
_ _ _.. _ .._... -- -- ---- - ___. _..-.—
2, Review and update the Ciry's Muoicipal Code for CDPW ''-Public Mayor's Office;Ciry
con.sistency with any regulatory chan,ges as it relates Works,Ciry Council,CDPW-
to franchises. - Attorney, Communiry
� fnnovatian and Development
Technolagy;,
�N�crcle�at�Ter:i�(2q1�thru 2025� � ' �` ,� �
,�,..-. �. --,. . �,�.. .°F� �.... .�...� ..uw.. . .,.�.., ._.. ._'�'�,. �.;�
�9 a _ � _ __._: - - -- --- -- -� � �-- �
3. In 2021,update Utilifies Policy E.I.ement •. `'�`, ,Gity Council,Planning
��mmission,Mayo�'§
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDP1N-Communiry
Development
, - - - ----— ---- _
- -- - -- -__.. ... __...._
4. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent �, Ciry Council;Planning
-. ,
with update to Utilities Policy El.ement :. ' � •"' Commission,Mayqrs
z
��,.: - . :
: ' Qffice;Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Gommuniry
Development
� .�,- �
�
�;c�n Term. p26 tlixu 2t335} ' `.
�... � ��� ,�.. �
�.. �� �� ��.
'�� �w� . ���� : �� �����
� � E .� �. � . . .,� _ ��.
._. - ----- - - _ . _ � =
5,. In 2028{upd�,te Utilities Folicp El�mertC ; �, Ciry Council;Planning
� Commission,Mayo�'s
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Gommunity
- � � - - — --. _.
Development
6. In 2029,update ciry zoning regulations to be consistent Ciry Council,Planning
with update to,Utilities Policy E[ement Commission,Mayor's
Office,City Attorney,
CDPW-Communiry
Development
_ ____ . _. __
City of Auburn � Core Comp"rehensiue Plan Page 46
ORD.E Page 117 of 751
Transpoctation Policy Element
Goals
1. Character: Investments in developing and maintain.i.ng ou�pedestrian, non-motonzed
and street infrastructure have resulted in the cteation of a community that is physically
connected.
2. Wellness: Residents, visitors and workers increase utilization of non-motorized forms of
transportation.
3. Service:Through partnership with other agencies, public transportation is an available
option for navigating the City and connecting to other forms of transportation.
4. Economv: Street surfaces are in a state of'good repair allowing people and goods to
navigate into, through and out of Aubum.
5. Celebration:As a result of imProvements to the t�ansportation infrastructure,com6ined
with modern design techniques,we experience a decreasing frequency and severity of
collisions.
6. Environment:Through development of additional non-motorized infrastructure there are
fewer vehicular trips per capita.
7. Sustainable:There is an adequate sustained source of financing for long term
investment in our streets;sidewalks,public landscaping,and non-motorized corridors.
Transportation Description:The transportation system is a vital component of Auburn's social,
economic, and physical structure:'The primary purpose of the transportation system is to
support the movement of people a.nd goods.within the City and con.nect the Ciry to the broader
region:: Secondarily, it influences patterns of g�owth,developmernt a.nd economic aetivityby
providing access to adjacent land uses: Planning for the development and maintenance of the
transportation system is a critical activiry promoting the efficient movement of people and
goods, ensuring emergency aceess, and optimizing the role transportation plays in attaining
other communiry o6jectives.
The Transportation Policy E.lement, also known as the Transportation Comprehensive Flan,
provides policy and technical direction for development of the City's transportation system
through the year 2035. It updates and expands the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan by
recognizing network changes since the last plan,evaluating current needs,and identifying
standards forfuture development and infrastructure improvements.The Plan underwent a
major update in 2005 and a midterm update in 2009 to incorporate the Lea Hill and West Hill
annexation areas into tfie Plan.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 47
ORD.:E Page 118 of 751
The Comprehensive Transportation Flan is the framework for transportation planning in
Aubum. It functions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system.The
Plan evaluates the existing system by identifying key assets and improvement needs.These
findings are then incorporated into a needs assessment,which guides the future of the
transportation system.
This Plan is multi-modal,addressing multiple forms of transportation in Aubum including the
street network, non-motorized travel, and transit. Evaluating all modes enables fhe City to
address its future transportation needs in a comprehensive and balanced manner.
Transportation Policies:
1. Level of Service (LOS) and concurrencystandards will be adopted and utilized when
evaluating the transportation impacts and mitigation measures associated with
development proposal.s. New development will pay for all system'enh.ancements
neeessary to support the development.
2. Engage in coordinated regional transportation planning efforts with King County, Pierce
County,Washington State Department of Transportation, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe,
Sound Transit,and adjacent jurisdictions:
3. Pursue funding.and actions that establish,public transportation options to all areas of
the City. ,
4. Incorporate Low,Impact Development(Llp)concepts and strategies into City initiated
transportati.on projects and,;privately initiated subdivision proposals.
5: Create-a pedestrian..and bicyde network.linking neigh.borhoods,activity centers, and
;;popular destinations,andupromote wal.ka6le, 6ike-able connectio.ns to transit service.
6. .Increase coordinatiqn and integration of land-use and transportation planning to
reduce traffic congestibn and protect the natural envi.ronment.
7. Provide tra;nsportation altematives that meet the needs of se.niors and those who are
unable to drive.
8. Inform the community of transportation improvements, capital projects, traffic
disruptions and alternative methods for avoiding delays.
9. Develop information about alternate modes of travel to enc.ourage visitors and
residents to walk and bike.
- � - �. ��.; � :_ .�
� : � � r �
� ;�, " F� 4� a � �� a�� �'�-�s "��'a.� a :�. � :�y ��m . �_".,��_,. �•- .
_� .���,,.� �"�?�.m. »'�`�`�:a����..� :'"�,�: ..2.,.>____.. _.s��'.�'*�Y�.t z�' ._..�.. ��
--_._...n....... �.."- _'- rn.-_.. .,.� .�.. -. .- _ - . __._ .
��Short�Term;(2�16th�u2a�.8} � �.. ; �� �, �� � � ;, �x � �•� �,� ..;.
. � . � _ �.W_.a. _ -�.�.����:;, ,�
1. Develop financial and eapital programm. ing standards CDPW-Public CDFW=Communiry
that establish minimum budget targets for non- Works Developrnent,Finance,
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 48
ORD.E Page 119 ofi 751
__ _ _- -- - -.
- -
motorized connection improvements: Mayors'Off.ice
—
2. Develop a Neighborhood Connectiviry Element of the CDPW-Public CDPW-Gommuniry
Cornprehensive Plan. Works Development
--
3.; Develop a cirywide wayPinding plan with strategies CDPW- CDPW-Public Works,
and actions directed at both non-motorized and Communiry CDPW-M&O
vehicle modes. Development
- -- . _
_--� -- _ ___
4. Implement the short-term actions outlined in[he CDPW.-
adopted Parking Management Plan Communiry
Development
_- -.._ _ _
_ _ _ _.. _ _ _
5. Identify and prioritize vehicular gateways into the Ciry, CDPW:-
Design and construct gateway ent.ry points. Carnmunity
.Deyelopment
MaderateTerm(2Q13,thru 20�5) g�,� �
� �
�..,�. a� � �
_ � _ . �.. _ .... . .. _ . - ���_,...
6. Implement the long-term actions outlined in the CDPW-
adopted Parking Management Plan. Community ,
- -. _
� � Developrnent �` . °��
_ _ _ . _ � _
7. In 2021,update the Transportation Policy Element.' CDPW-Public Giry Council,Planning
� r/Morks�` Ctxrimission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
` ' ': CDPW-Community
, Development
. _.
8. In 2022,update ciry zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW-Public Giry Cou..neil, Planning
with update to TranSportation Policy Element Wqrks Gomm.ission,Mayor's
- � � Office,Ciry Atto',rney,
CDPW-Community
Development
C:or�g Terrn(2026 thru 2035)`�w.: � °_
__. ..� . ... . _ . . , .
_� .� � � � _ _ _�_
9. In 2028,update T.ransportatian Policy Element. CDPW-Public Ciry Cou_ncil,planning
Works Commission,,Mayor's
Office,Gity Attorney,
CDPW-Coromunity
__ _ _
Development
--- •-- _
10. In 2d29,update ciry zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW-Public Ciry Council, Planning
with update to Transportation;Policy Element Works Commission;Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW.-Communiry
Development
_ __.
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 49
ORD.E Page 120 of 751
Economic Development Policy Element
Goals
1. Character: Our cultural diversity has been leveraged to bind our community,expand our
market,and eelebrate cultural traditions.
2: Wellness:We are a safe community with walkable commercial districts where therethe
perception and reality is that crime activity is low and public safety staffin,g meets or
exceeds t.lie comm.unity's expectations.
3. Service°Ou�economic developme_nt strategies focus on supporti�ng ttie existing
business community; as a result, recruitment is,rninimal because businesses desire to
locate here.
4. Economy:We are able to measure and;achieve defined targets,for manufacturin.g,
service,and retail jobs and revenues.-
5. Celebration;We actively promote our local businesses,and have been successful at
making our citizens more aware of what is available locally as well as attracti.ng visitors
from beyond our City.
� � _
6. Environment'Qu�economy is growing and diversifying becau:se of our efforts to prgtect
our�ivers,streams,'wetlands and°other environmental'resources.
7, Sustainable: R �
�" esider�ts�are staying in Auburn�to wo[k and shop and we are widely
� ��
eonsideretl��c�;be�a regianal di�ning,shopping and entertainment destination.
Econornic C��velopment f�escription ,3:
Auburn's economic base driues_and shape�the communiry and region. Auburn's residents
..,
�. t.
and,,the surrounding region benefit from the jobs and services Auburn's economic base
offers: Th,r,o.ugh the paym'ent of sal�s; property and other taxes,the City of Auburn can fund
and provideservices and public facilities which Aubum residents require.
It is in the City's k�est.irtte,rest to maintain and expand our economic base in unison with
implementing all of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This section of the plan will help
to define the City's goals and policies in this vital area. .
Economie Development Folicies:
1. Attract high wage employment opportunities and sales tax generating businesses to
diversifythe City's economic base and generate positive secondary benefits forthe
com..mu..nity.
Ci.ty of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 5D
ORD.E Page 121 of�751
2. Assist business organizations in developing and implementing new or improved
product development opportunities to increase sales tax revenue collections.
3. Dedicate resources to pursue an expanded economic development program for the
ciry.
4. pevelop a clear and elaborate City branding strategy.
5. Create an economic development toolbox comprised of programs and incentives to
reduce financial, regulatory, and operational constraints for existing or new business
growth and expansion.
6. Prioritize the instailation of key infrastructure at identified employment areas to facilitate
development of these economic centers.
���� �'t`� � r �'����.�_s'�z�€ i.?� __,.� --fd�����g"'(`;y}I�b.,�. Y ���,,�� - { ���¢ ,�.�t a����'�„� �-;
> � � ��� � '� �...
� �t f^. � S.s�.' J`';,� � i '* -- a.:. '� �
„�,,.: V....�.s»5,�b..s«:� ` '
- _....,tnu.... F.�.-.` �."
� ...��__.___ .. ._._.. .... .�,_�...,. .,..� m „-. _ .
_ . .,._.. _ .. . _'—'"—". ,.--- a' , .
Short T,erm(2016.thru 2018) °
_ --- - --�-� -_ - � � �
1. Adopt and implement a Ciry 10 year Economic
- -
Development Strategic Plan
�_ �_ _ �--:.
��Ntoderate�Term(2Q19 thrw�2025)� �� � � _ � � � �
___ _.___ __,._ .__ _ .. �
_ .
2. In 2021,update Economic Development Policy Mayor's Office Ciry Council,Planning
Element. Commission,Ciry
Attomey,CDPW-
Community
Development
_ --- _
. ------ -
3. In 2022,update ciryzoning regufations to be consistent Mayor's Office Ciry Council, Pianning
with update to Economic Development Policy Element Commission,Giry
Attorney,CDFW-
Community
Development
_ _ _ _, �
Lor�g Term,(2028 thru��2035)�� � � . � � : . ,' _ �,� � �
,..�_, �
-----
4. In 2028;apdate Economic Development Policy Mayor`s Office Ciry Council Planning
Element. Commission,Ciry
Attorney,CDPW-
Cornmunity
Development
5. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent Mayor's Office Ciry Gouncil,Rlanning
with update to Economic Development Policy Element Commission,City
Attorney,CDPW-
Communiry
Development
__ - -- -
City of Autiurn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 51
ORD:E Page 122 of 751
Parks and Open Space Policy Element
Goals
1. Character:There are a mix of smail urban parks, natural areas,sports complexes, and
community buildings that offer a full range of recreation service.
2. Wellness: Parks are well advertised, maintained,and are safe locations during all hours.
3. Sefvice: Parks and park programming are accessible to all segments of the population.
4. Eeonomv: Our parks and natural.spaces are one of ttie majo�reasons that businesses
and residents site why they chose to locate hereF and why they choose to stay.
5. Celebration:There are a mix of large and small parks that are being used for local,
neighborhood,city-wide,and regional events.
6. Environment: Parks,open spaces,and natural areas are designated, designed and
maintained in a manner that respects the environment and natural setting.
7. Sustainable:Park development and maintenance has an identified long term funding
source that ensures that the system grows and.improves.
Parks and O�pen Space Description: `` � � � �
Parks, arts,open space; and recreation facilities are an essential ameniry to maintain a high
quality of life in the commuriity. As the population of Auburn grows,the demand for parks,
recreational programs, arts and culture,and,open space will continue to increase. To
maintain Auburn's qualiiy,of life;the supply af`parks and programs must keep pace with the
demand associated with a growing population.,`
Parks and Open Space.Policies:'
1. Provide and maintain a comprehensive system of parks and recreation programs thaf
serves°the needs and desires of the City's residents.
2. Protect and preserve open space and nafural areas that incorporate appropriate
opportunities`for residents and citizens to view and learn about natural systems and
habitats.
3. Pro�ide activities and amenities that allow for community interactions and encourage
active and healthy lifestyles.
4. Provide a broad variety of recreational and cultural opportunities to all residents.
5. New development will contribute to the de�elopment of new parks at a level
eommensurate with their share of new facility needs,
City of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 52
ORD.E Page 123 of 751
6. Provide and support community events,festivals, and programs that offer a variety of
opportunities for social interaction and contribute to a serise of community.
7. Diversify the funding sources that support the City Parks,Arts and Recreation
Department to include public funding, earned revenues;development impact fees,and
outside funding sources.
8. Establish regulations and incentives to incorpo.rate parks and trails into subdivisions
and other development projects.
9. Support eollaboration between agencies,organizations;and businesses on trails
marketing, management,and maintenance in recognition of the value of trails to the
communiry and the economy.
, ' � «, �-- r ,,r �` =, t �€ . �'—� > -��s a�� �� .�� .
� �.� , i�, � z{ ;` � �. ! 2.� ..t� �s��-�� {� e� TMd� '�-�
� ` ,� , a,, « �� 3 �� .����
� �.t�.e.����.�`..�'-���<�'�.. . .,., °'�.m � �;, ,��,> . �, _. `.�� fr-- .`
_� . _ .. ._ .....,�s . „_._.,.,,. ._.W,�a>'�,...,.._ ..�a
_w _, .-�... . _ . . . . .._,. .
...., . ..,.,,__
� Short Term�(2Q16 thru 2018)�� � � � � �
_, ____ . �._ _ _ . �
1. Establish Level of Service(LOS)standards for parks, Parks CDPW-Community
open space,arts and service programs. Development
- - -. - ,
2, Establish a formal fee in lieu of pcqgram Parks CDPW-Communiry
Development,Ciry
Attorney,MayoPs
Office
3. Acquire additional properties for inclusion;in the ' CDPW-. Parks
Auburn Environmental Park and develop a Environmental
eomprehensive management plan. Services
4. Complete and acfivate the Aulium Youth and CDPW-Public CDPW-Communiry
Community Center Works,Parks Development,Police
5. Complete the Les Gove Comrnuniry Campus Plan Parks Ciry Council,Mayor's
Office,Police,CDPW
�> �:__. ... ,..._. _.—_ , _,
NloderateTerrri(2019��thru�2025) ��� � � � � � �
_ �a.. __ . . � y . ...�.�_ .,._.
.- -_
_� I
6. Begin,identification of acquisition needs based on Parks
Level of Service.
_- -
7. Develop criteria and strategies for identifying land that Parks,CDPW- CDFW-Communiry
should be preserved as open space and funding Environmental Development
mechanisms for acquiring prioriry lands. Services
_ .-- - - -
8. In 2021,update ParkS and Open Space Policy Parks Ciry Council.,Planning
Element. Commission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Communiry
Development
- .
9. ln 2022,update ciry zoning regulafions to be consistent Parks Ciry Council,Planning
with update to Parks and Open Space Policy Element Commission,Mayor's
Office,City Attorney,
CDPW-Communiry
Development
Ciry of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 53
ORD.E Page 124 of 751
_ ,
Long=Terrn(2026 thru 2035). 0. ` - , _
� �. . � ,,;.�: > � �� � �.: �,o ,�; ��
10. in 2028,update Parks and Open Space Policy Parks Ciry Gouncil,Planning
Element. Commission,Mayor's
Office,Ciry Attorney,
CDPW-Comrnunity
Developi�nent
11. In 2029,update ciry zoning regulations to be consistent Parks City Council,Planning
with update ro Parks and Open Space Policy Element Commission,Mayor`s
Office,Ciry Attomey;
CDPW=Communiry
Development
City of Aubu.rn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 54
ORD.E Page 125 of 751
�, , ,. - ,�� , . ��. � � � - .;.r. .� �
'� �," �r� i � r, �atw: ' s^L � � /�j,' ,� � ,� y,,�,, '��•'.0 ,� � '7n��'j,� ,,
.;�, � `o� �`� � . ��'`� I��y.` °"`,�_.x o .'_ ��'4� V5, ' �` -ti_ �+�` �' *• -s 'rh �:. S F `�;j � '
.��.��- � . . �.
�, c r ` ' ae w , � �.
� .. � a4 : ,_ � [ � _ ,- i � �. '� � . � � x-
{., t A � tl ��� �. .
• ��t ... s� _�P; _ , � • . �Y'�, �,.. . � 4'Y� i.YX ��� ���� � s :�
y q }� �p�� �' � �
sY� ' :.�`�7�, � 4 � i , _. �• :� "",r�: �
� 4 1"..�.wk. } �s,yj•.y�.�x � ' ;t ,qc„?i°d�" � � . . �t�� �,_f _._� } �_._., `1 �. ,�o.,P,�� � .�:d'. �, :�.� �, n. ���yn�t^{ _ .o _ s r '.,:E
f . �a � ,� h T ,a - i'l;� �,;... � �- ": .
�.���,y k :.,�� ,..�K'�T ��i ' - . + � j f��:.r� . ti � �<�� Y ,...- � �.., �`�. � N.�-�w� ,. -,
. ,j . .,`- .,.' ��..,�».'�. . � - . SG�- '1: - �r ,`.`�, �# ...., �R :t` � h::''.a ♦ ��' �+
�.,�y • ..� .. �y��.i,k , » r_'� _ f 3 r i�r'11 -�IA� �I - ..fy
�' r ,v
k a,t ..' - • :� • - #--� r� ' - } -�
saa►� s� �`� � 1�..�.,�
.. . . . �fa
t1 • ,i5 �''M- t _�
_ �
i'
• .r :�, :.��� � . - � ` �R. _' ' d.�. �� .`- ` Z1+�� .� ♦� .
�r+l�-. • 1��-r ! 1t-
r
a } ' K. �.I�'. ..
' .7 : � � ' . ... .- : <t 7 'b >'' r "71� ./�
�.
-� : . a s,��.� �� � �I�.
■ 7' �+ f `t+S,e . ti � s`� � _ `? ���
Y .,. f F
s:,�� � �� �.., ;y ...'� � -� . ;.� I1 � i i:;� ���, r�,+�r��r � ���.i�< . � * lr., �t.���`��,��, -
� -�� �- �a�, ��---
# � �t. q{�, , ' .
'h..�- �1: {�r;�N��Mh��' ; " . �� ,=i,( �__---.�. . . ��i JI l+ '.��1��"'asv"""'�r �_Y_ �s� _. ���'t .,,r. 5 �1 �r"� .- +�•'�
' �
.� .
. �
. � • ��
�,r r ais'.� r�}�. -� .,,,,, , ; ; ;.�'. _~ _ _ ��`_i;�' 1�''�q,� "��� i
rc� . .: � , .,C
� .
+�" =. ,� i.;.: ���'�, ' � • , �_ ;; - ---�r � j l` •/,,.
,. �.'� _., !
�, ' � "����'_�.^.---.lv. � � .: .I� �.}'� . -.ne�
�J �
} • _
.. � �
.. � � �i ♦ .:...
y +1 r
� -.�� �� . . � F �,* -
}; � s
'. _ •'� _ .. � ;.. � ,a.: �+•
t e r -
"' .w � ' � � '. _., _ �.. f�
.. i; ,,._ �. < _ �.
} R , ^¶ _
. L. ♦ v�'�`�� � ��j y: '� ��'" .
.... __ Ai ,' ' �
. � �... _ ��.
�T
, '`'y';5 '4 • . � ' �� -T=-.: � ' _... n� ."_.. �i. 1�. .. � � '�
'.��. - "'"' " """' "' '
�y � .;���'. V -. . .� ; ... ':�__- �. _. �; �_�--��r '� _� ._. I �+. _. �C.-._. . _t' � .
� t r _ ... 41 � � :a_. Zi -� �'. _ � �, . • �.
-' �
5 F . : �' � . ',. 1 ■ ' �
��, , . n � � - , , I�(
-�� .� .�L�,, _ � ` L.-.�.,. ;;
I� y+n��� � 9 � . ' - . - . ' . .
_�' v �° . � • � 't
�I. "�1ti� {' f / ' . ... • __ __ I
��� � � . �: . _ � . �
C 4 � _ .._ �1 ; .._ _. ',�1�
t� i
I �. : `-� ` , . , � � .. .. '�, ..Y R, • ,--�. �
t.. � . � .t , _ ' � .-, ,
� . i
.. j • �� � a�,�I
;:r,t^- .�,:� '� ;P,�� � � - — � ` � ;�., � _ '�,.'Yz.,.;
'� ,� �.�'r ,,,. �� ,_, J � � � �:
"
,�� �� u � � 1 , �� a - . . , �
� t - . � � �
�� p.'�. '� J ,' �I . . �� I .-_ - ��'�. • � %fY: -
_
, � _ � . , �� � . .
.�w.� �-,. - . � . , � i. ., � � . •, a
� ?i6�` � � � . . - . ' �
..__.._. �� � •
��
'�. S: y' �, . - . . , : ' ' .__..�. �1.�,• �;,, . s�.. , �.i�
a��`"� � � �
.
;�` ' _ ��
` .�w ^� � r ..I ., ' � , � A_. 4�.
� i� . yA.:. � i _- . � _ �� � . � � ' �i
� ' y �--�-1 i -�" � ! 'j�;W � ��
.
- 4�� �.....,. _ � �� ,
.+`� ���� "�
t � t � , �
�, - ; _�
. :� ,, �
P. . _ J � �_ � ., �F . �
;.�
���� -
„e,�. �'yi .� � ''.. .-'- �,.,_ 1 � � _ .. � � , .. . � s����
} � � �. �
�
Y "�. .� : _ , F - i i �,` ' �� _ .
� _
i
.1__ ._.-�1
.� �'y��� � � I . .. �� �'.��� r� :_.�' .�., ' .
.,
;
I� 'r t � �.� .,� a_. _, __ - � � .
� �
, .'
- � � �' .. � ...�.
� �' I . 4� 7�
� % . �.. ' _.__ . ': i : �
�'_"_ ' "
y� �� � �� .�. .. �S..-.� . .. . 1 � �'aY i
� '� ! i � :L . +� ..�; .tn
�K �s":�'/�' . 3�S ; � -rc�a '�r.:>`r p ��'4y"x..�.r.:�.
� . � - - ,,'n
��.�
$YIT��If133�A p '- � �„�Mv '_ .r 7
'��1 . , ,. �� �,: � ' i -- '��.G^��',' ~P `�,' , � , �; ��,, �j,``..`
. , .. i_ _ :.�, '�-
.
._
p _ I , . �
. _N - � , - ` - . ,_.-.
c:
fT1��,a r
;
F�L _. !� x., ' � ���4 f . � � L .F � F'f .� � .. _. . ;�p.,. ' ._.
�, � ��.., K.�� .
.,�: . �� r ,�. �„: �,
;� �., ,:�..� _ _ ,, * .
_._. -
�.
v �, �, i ;;,, . �
�, - '� -'_ � ���� _1 rii - _ �,� � � r .;� -���: . �.� ��
�
�
� -
. �. �. �
_
,.
�, ,�-- ,. �,.,, �r� �-,
� _ � � �
�. , � � ,� �___.
, ,
� .: � � �- - - +�"'�, � �, ��y��+ . �. . �� .
� , , ..
� , . �; � ,
��w �M. -. . I� 4 <.A'. �..�✓S �e�!'g�"7�."��,i�.;S'�"".':a' t �M� Y b� �.- � vs .a
� ' , � � S � � . . .'.""� `�.. � A - -��.i' � �.�y�
� , � �� _ �{3H ,��'� � . . . � �. ,
„
• . - • � ��� i ;�� � b
. .: , , �� _ � �. � � �'" � -
;.�:. , � —� � � _ �� �—.�,�,,,,�,;�,,� :;; ,�'
___.
_
� ,� , .;
____
� � _ - -- ,_::,� _ -
,
�
- � ,�y � -. .. � _� f � '�. %� ,•�,?r ,��i�c :"
-" �a< i�3 , . l.i=i - - - -...._. _. ,.�, � t� � ' ��
, , r�
�• b � � .$'��� ,
' `�,, ,� F ;'— i " _ � _ — �,i `�'_" , �� �, 'R"",�� f �,
y,,� _v s ��,��, 'd? ��---� f ,,r�� ." t�c�yy �,�'s' • .
,
.
;
� - , . ... . � �r . _ _ �,. �R�a �. p .
i . t.
p �. F'.n . ._yr . ���... � � � QI
��.',,.� . : ;'��� ___ �..� � ��� � ,__-__... . ... � : 'y '�S.l� 'R �1 ,� ���.
ly1�l �,1,� ,}'�� �E..a^? i� � � � � •.r �\� _1�:�` . . .� � ` `\ ��r.,1'f''�'.� �' '!F3jlt �j� ,•I�
� .� _
'�'� , �-, t :: m4A _' y
� [' , 4 �� � .. , . I -_ yy,t "f'�.,�M��1�. .. ),�111�+�i +d°�y'^� ,
.. ��e�;.' �;� !��• , " � __' ti s�,� �
� , ,, . ,:
.
���
. - � _,� ., ... - . , _ �,, _ _ ;��,,,,
� ' � � ���
.�, �;:. � , ' . , -
.. .� �
_ ,,
. �. . _
:, ��
��,:,� i � ,i..- � _ � � �•.� J. � ��j:�� r� ��x -_.�
,1�. s,�.ry��, -L-Y � r ,�xy;¢.� �� '�, � ' ' �.5� . _� - .i _. ,.�"�_ri�
;� ! - �„ .�r.. � 1 14_M =,j, ' � � M„� : �i. ` . .
. :
� �'.r. � -:f��� ��� 4', �� ��� � Ih L_ y � .. '
r . - f�� . i ��:
_" t �'�+�f • '„ .,.�S� , } '.4� � � '��,i � . _
P��c ri,�. � r ' �:'• -. � -. � -. ' _- . �� .
,
: .. � __... I � ,.:
� ,
, _
i
��� �. �' y r�_. '�� .. "f ._..s. ,r-- 1`� i� �; . .
�
- ..�. :. . t � � � , .
v .�
.. . .. � �„r �,.1 � .R ! _.. _
. -_ ` .,. '�,''�'1•�. h '�r1 � '- I-1 . � .
, .� `_�� � �..r 1 �y-.ra�.."' '
_ �
, ... ,. ""'""� .
.
�..-,, .x � ra•,'• ' ' v _ �' '
�. �
�,, o! � , ' ' _ ,. _
1 ' �. "�a�
f,k� � + "_ � �
'� ~ --
� .. . �r' �� .t j-r --��,a
, � a � � �
_' :
,� � �
. y .
'� � � --
l�l�r y �� "f1 ••�' '" _ � � '.�:;: �
.
. c
��, n . _
f. } �= M: y �Y r '�N�," y `i .
� t� P ,�{��
���.`c.�� 1�'"... �� r��y ?.Y� � 1'U��f ._.... . ,, ,._ . . ,.. -_-- -_- . --.
., .. .,
_ry .. ^ , , �
.; �JA I .� .�.,' ... -....� . :-•i�y.a'�:� "� .`�Y�
�. itY A/4. � � , ':� , �
Residential L�a ry„i�`' �y,-`3 x.' ' I` z • 'y»4. �' �� i
ResidentialConservanc �,�,'�'` °'Y7;�'��x,. "' ' • . ' .. ,� � � ':�
n F�;. �I
SingleFamily Y - �,���� ���}�', ,�
.. �
Residential Transition ��r �' `° ' - —
: �' $'�^: r �r! �,� , . a1-
�, � d -
Multi-Family ,�� ,r�� " .,:�; , , a ,�,: �. •
s %ibT�'a` ,F y 4�f: � 't � , . i� . � � .J^.
Residential Mixed Use r��`�` �y, ti ,;� � ` ����r,y-- ,"s' / i . }- �„� �'��
�'.����1�P-33 r �� 6.?! � ��,:y Y . 1 .. I _.i-� _.. ,.,� � . I
{
Commercial 4� _� � �-: �r� .,,� b z:F�� �.�" � `�'I y;fi`�( , �"� ` >
� rt �t
�lr. � � t ? F .w � .�iy i I . , T � � ' , r�r� �,'�Lt ��,...`�I
Downtown Urban Center w �i" � Fy �,;�P;% ��: ' i '* ,;� '
Neighborhood Commeraal ; .,� �.,G , �} � �'� � . i
�� � t F �I ,...
LightCommercial ,F� r�` 4��'-�-yf � , "S ' ,�""r�;.� 4 I I F��._ , �
�4 u-l.� �s � �� � � � "
Heavy Commercial '_ �;,_ L i "'a`�b! /�`r ,��'�. �� ' �' _ �• ,��-
y, �.
��- w 4`- �� .��' f 4 1 ... .,I
�� '�S✓ M �..�•1 �- N
Industrial � ;:�,�.`° ` ` � �/�
' �_i- "5��� Aw�����.� ,: k.^ ��'- ts.:S�w��-� S.C� _ ,�. �Y'v f��: J.S. ..�y�^" '�.�-.� ��•,.
N � _
-r�3t- r ��r.R -, r * r ' �- y� ' -. �
Li ht Industrial _ `+ . r�+ . ;.�. o- r. � t�, y:., ,�:;., � ' �..,,..
9 � � , C', �'",`_ �, � �� �.' � r�G S � ,;.,
� ,�
- Heavy Industrial �sm�,; ., ;' ;� E �,,,; ��'� a ;���,;�� r s —�--*
. ..
_ ... .. .�t i . �..4.� 4i`� N., �; �
� -��.. 1� R p .
� N j�
.. .. r.�, '� 'ry '. ¢,��
ti 4�7~ i , ` `r.� ..w �� � ,� �1' . �
y � �`� 'I � �t� , � �h
Public&Quasi-Public �� .,F..r - .;� ' '•'�"� .:: b .� �;,��, � ;"^�q4,��"�'��.r�s�'�R��� �r.�,il
"t �� �, i a � � � } �,� ..r. r_.,w�
..
... ,... , r�
t � .r qqq...���
.. L )
. Institutional .T �..D� S � . -�� ..I .. ..... ,,.:�.i�+ ,. .�'�� K �pyN �+./�,�r...��� • .'n4.
, _- ,. ,� '�` . ,�
Open Space -.r�,,� �. - - �. ���� � r 4 �
! "F'°1�:.� � iJµ . S . �a - � 'f �i.�e � M.
�a
Overlays 5� �, 'v.r� }���o � �t �. � •�" y�i., l
,
� ,
i � � �`' Y h� . � _� � � ;����, �!. K � � �� a"'. � �`��'�10.`'b
ResidentialTransition �� ������ � �' .� . + � ��` �� ,a�` �a�<+J�':'' I �V� ���1� �A�,�� `�, �`i
., y '� �` - ,.�r � .�.. �:�A'�,e+,� r�y A".' , � ..y�t . '�.p,� � ��i'-�`` u„ .
_ NeighborhoodCommercial w, ' � o -- �. � �"' , � y���,�x�+- '��'z'4a�''w`�`�65�,� � � �.�,
1 1 �/ !� �Mi,� �p►'��-' r �t,' i ,� .. R_'� iI� ��: �w �'� '�!w y ,��..�ri
��� �+� '���'--- ,'�i 1�y' � . '�M`5d�'j . �z� �' N. . (� °�`°`�„ Q , t,. hr7 i�x. b o � �7�•L�Hy �,.,
�; .�6 . `d +�i' �s��V
Regional ,� -- ,� a,� �+ ��,,�' - atF,�,r���� ' �°- ..r� 3�., . �� �A• < ��i: 4 a �-�i
't .,� hE::i ,� �: .��, i. �- � .�= � , �'�' *�.:.,.
��1,�•;;a'r ���� r --�?.,--.-• � .� r .". �� t r } � � _�� q `:� --,R.-
Urban Separator , � / ,. :: ;�� _ '
� PotentialAnnexationAreas k��; F�..�,}� �,,y�j_„14�.� r ' �a' x'� y�_ � ;` �' ' � `'+ � S�" �<,� ��',
' �C ' b ,� ! � . .� . . .
! y �'_�"� ,.�-...-..�,�� �` q-;,i. � -, t :., � .. �,�:,�{ �.., "`�` . ,i
� Special Planning Areas ,;�; _ _ � ` � �,�'�y,'7 'f,f",r t;�� - M�w+ y+�e� ,v •i�'+ _ '' `",
, r
- • � �^ -• ;��,.;. �, .
(Adopted) a,. '' �' r. , . � . " r tJ;r�j� � �- �,�� �� ;y„ � �
� �, 3 s r,'
.. . . ., .. ,_ .?._ .-, � --.:�:..-.' ... ir+„�y.. v.Y�._.�� '" J. ..��: ✓7�'.. �r 4��
.._ . ....._,-� . ..'i��-y.t's�. .�Yd _ _'__ -- "1.
A'uB,u,�� DRAFT Comprehensive Land Use Map (10/13/15) W-��
ORD.E Page 126 of 751 �
J
Appendices
Appendix A-The Auburn Community Vision Report
Appendix B-The Auburn Housing Needs and Characteristics Assessment
Appendix C-The Auburn Housing Element Checklist
Appendix D-The Auburn Health Impact Assess.ment
Appendix E-The Comprehensive Public Participation Plan
Appendix F,1-The King Counry Buildable Lands Analysis
Appendix F:2-The Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis
Appendix G-Auburn Airport Master Plan .
Appendix H-Auburn Communiry Profile
Appendix I -Aubum Greenhouse Gas Inventory
C:ity of Auburn � Core Comprehensive Plan Page 56
ORD.E Page 127 of 751
�xhibi� �
AaIJ�URN COI!/IPR�H�NSIVE P�41V 0 \iO�UliJl� �
�and llse Element
LAND USE ELEMENT VISION
Auburn is a community fhaf is both physically and sociaily connecfed. We fake pride in fhe quality of our built
environment as well as fhe beauty and funcfron of our nafural environmenf. Land use pattems are supporfed by
a eomplefe and e�rcienf fransporfation and utilifyinfrastructure sysfem. Neighborhoods, commercial cenfers,
and parks are affractive, inferesfing, accessible,and weN maintained. Natural riverine and forestec!corridors are
inferspersed fhroughoutthe city and offer a sanctuary for fish and wi�dlife fo reside and people fo yisrt so they
may observe and learn about the environmenf. Residenfs have a strong association wifh their neighborhood
and are engaged and invoived in fhe decisions fhaf sfeerAubum into;the future.
LAND USE CONDITIONS AiVD TRENDS SUMMARY ,
Dispersed Land Use Pattern. For the first 100 years of Auburn's existence the land use pattem
developed in a relatively logical manner. Auburn was fully contained to the valley floor with a traditional
downtown urban center, several northlsouth heavy commereial and industrial. corritlors that parallel
Highway 167, and a surrounding housing stoek builf primarily between 1910 and 1960. In the last 30 years
the land use pattem of Aubum has changed primarily because of the incorporation of:areas to the south,
east; and west. Each of the newty incorpo�atetl areas has its own identity and land use pattern.
Disconnected Communities. Because a signifcant portion of toda�s Aubum was settled prior to
incorporation, fhe basic land use patterns and infrasfivcture have already been established. Furthermore;
much of today's Auburn land use pattern was established in either Auburn;the Muckleshoot Reservation;
or prior to incorporation in King County or Pierce County. Given the mix ofjurisdictional oversight there are
a myriad of different land use policies; regulations, infrastructure standards, and investments that have
applied in these areas. This has resulted'in a relatiVely uncoordinated and random land use pattern. It also
means that the various communities lack connectivity to each ofher, have a mix of idenfities, and are
experiencing a change in their character from rural to more urban.
Robust Diversity of Land Use. Auburn�has a strong��mix of housing and industry. Aubum's residential
land use pattern includes a variety_of tlensities, ages, and housing type. Aubum's non-cesidential land use
pattern includes a mix of local and regional retail, entertainment, senrices, manufacturing; warehousing,
and distribufion centers. This mix of,land use is a strength because it exemplifes social, economic, and
culfural diversity.
Diversity in Natucal Resources. Auburn's natural resources include the Green River and its tributaries,
the White River and its tributaries; a robust inventory of wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, and mature
open spaces. With a strong base to work from, the City and its partners can be strategic about how to
better connect and preserve nafural areas so that the overall system is enhanced for future generations to
enjoy.
INTRODUCTION
RII land within the City of Auburn is assigned a land use designation, which builds off the past
Comprehensive Plan Map, the existing land use patter, previously approved su.b area plans, topography,
natural features, and targeted goals for sh.'ifting the character of specifed areas. This chapter provides a
description for each designation, general criteria for how to assign the designation, and a senes of policies
that govern land use within each designation. The Comprehensive Plan Lantl Use Map contained in the
ORD.E Page 128 of 751
a�,a�r w�va us���.�M��vr oc�ro���a.s,z��.s
Core Comprehensive Plan shows the location and boundaries for each designation. This map shouid be
consulted together with the written policies of fhis Plan when decisions about zoning designations, land use
activities, and development of public infrastructure are considered.
This Section of the document also explains the �easoning and intention behind the Plan Map's land use
designations. This should be useful in:
• Developing and implementing tools(such as zoning provisions)
• Interpreting the Plan Map as it applies to specific regulatory decisions or development proposals
• Adjusting or amending the Plan Map when changing conditions or land use markets warrant
o Planning forpublic senrices and infrastructure
Finally, this chapter sets forth special policies intended to address the unique chal.lenges and opportunities
of specific locations within Aubum. These specific policies supplement the general goals, objectives and
policies found elsewhere in this plan.
OR . 9of751
_ _ Page � 2
���FT ca��us�������vr ocr�a�R z�,zoa.s
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Character Sketch:
Residential uses will be comprised of a diverse arrangement of multiple densities. The pattem of one
single density in a zone or neighborhood will evolye into increased and mixed densities in exchange for
amenities that enhance quality of life. There will be greater connectivity and stronger spatial
relationships between neighborhoods through strategic locations of roadway, trail, park, and
neigYiborhood-serving businesses. These amenities will help create localized identity while also linking
_
one area to another. The design and 6uild quality of new construction and infill will be held to a high
standard. The City will encourage projects to be unique, innovative, and provide the residents of
Auburn true choice.
Values:
Character - Residential neighborhoods will include amenities; features antl layouts that promote
interastion amongst residents.
Wellness - The design of residential neighborhoods will emphasize safety and non-motorized
connectivity, �
Service -Through outreaeh and engagement, individual residents and homeowne�'s associations are
connected to and aware of municipal senrices, events,and activifies.
Economy - Neighborhoods have a physical and personal connection to Aubum's commercial centers
and attractions. People want to mo�e to Auburn because of the commercial and recreational
opportunities it has to offer.
Celebration -Disficts and neighborhoods are identifed, promoted and celebrated.
Environment - The 6uilt environment will fit into the natural lantlscape in a way that protects and
respects ecosystem function and that preseNes native vegetation and soils.
Sustainable•.Natural resources, economic.prosperity; and cultural vibrancy are balanced in a way that
builds and maintains a thriving and long-lasting community.
General Policies
Policy LU-1._ Regulations;fornew developments and infill should address the following elements:
a. Connectiv'ity by multiple means to adjacent subdivisions, nearby commercial hubs,
and parks and recreation facilities.
b. Relationship=to nea.rby existing or future transit service.
c. Useable community amenities and spaces.
d. Environmental profection and preservation of natural features.
e. Preservation of areas that can supportiow impact development(LID)teehniques.
� f. Efficient and effective delivery of utility service.
g. Innovative design.
h. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED).
i. Long term maintenance considerations.
OR_ .: _ Oof751
Page � 3
DRAF7 IANC?US�ELEMENT OCl'06ER 13,2015
Polisy LU-2. As the market and utility availability enable denser development to occur, standards
should be developed to maximize density while presenring open spaee and critieal
areas.
Policy LU-3. Programs should be implemented to improve fhe quality of low income neighborhoods
and encourage rehabilitation of deteriorating structures and facilifies.
Policy LU-4. Public and institutional uses may be permitted as a contlitional use if designed in a
manner which enhances the residential character ofthe area. Special care shall be
given to ensuring adequate parking, landscaping, and traffic circulation to avoitl
conflictwith residential uses.
Policy LU-5. New residential development should contribute to the creation, enhancement and
improvement of fhe Vansportation system, health and human senrices,emergency
services, school system, and park system. This may be accomplished fhrough the
development of leVel of service standards,mitigation fees, impacf fees,or construction
cont�ributions. �� �
Policy LU-6. Cluster development is the prefemed form of�esidential deVelopment in all residential
designations with the goal of presenring natural areas, critical areas, and areas that
support low impact development Where clustering accomplishes these objectives, it
should not come at the expense of lost development potential. Variances to lot size,
lot dimensions, building height, and other bulk o"r dimensional standards should be
utilized in order to ineentivi�ie and promote preservation.
Land Use Designations
_ � �� � . - � ��
ResidentialConsenrancyiAa 9 ° � �
,.� ��, � h -.� ff,. � � �� � �. , ����� �
��.=_. .� � _�_ . ..:.. ...... : �� �� .: _� ..��._ _ , ��,� n� ���� �_.
Description - This designation should consist.primarily of low density residential uses (one
dwelling unit per four=acres �s allowed) and accessory agricultural uses in areas featuring
environmer�af �nstraints or "requiring special protection such as the Coal Creek Springs
watershed area; low lying areas a(ong the Green River, and areas that are isolated from urban
services. This designation will senie to both protect environmental features and hold areas for
higher density development until such fime public facilities become available.
,
Designa�on�_Ciiteria � �
1. Areas with s�gnficant environmental consfiraints, intrinsic valu_e; or which .may pose
environmer�al hazards if developed, such as areas tributary to public water sources;
2. Affords greater protectians to environmental features than e�asting designation;
3. Level of seNice for property consistent with adjacent residential conservancy properties; or
4. Location, size of properties, and character is consistent with a residential conservancy use.
Implementing Zoning Designations
Residential Conservancy
Policies
Polic LU-7. Densities and activities shall be of a ve low intensi and shall not com romise
OR . 1 of 751
Page � 4
i�R�1FT EA1VC}�S��L�i��IVT �fCF�DBE��.3,2t315
environmental and watershed resources.
Policy LU-8, In addition to single family homes, these larger propertie:s can also be developed
with garages, accessory dwelling units, bams and other. accessory outbuildings. .
Home occupations, agricultural uses, and other allowed non-resid.ential activities ,
may operafe out of any type of permitted building, subject to intensity and use
limitations.
Policy LU-9: Until these areas are served by public utilities (water, sewer, storm services),
existing and new development is noi expected to be served by public
infrastructure; such as urban streets, curbs, gutters; sidewalks, street lighting,
and landscaping.
Policy LU-10. As the market and utility availabilify enable denser development to occur,
standards should be developed to maximize density while preserving open space
and critical areas;
Policy LU-11. Small scale agriculfural uses are allowed and encouraged. Commercial activities
thaf are directly related to and supporC agncultural uses,may also be allowed.
�The procedural standard�s may, vary depending upon �the type and sc�ale of
agrisultural uses and supporting commercial activities. Small scale agncultural
uses are allowed and encouraged. .3-� �
Policy LU-12. Land use standards should adequately fimif and control excessive accumulation
of debris. Where a permitted activity does allow outdoor storage, it should be
adequately screened`from 4adj�ent properties and roads; as well as ensuring
adequate soil and environmental protection. °
Policy LU-13: Public, institutianal, and resource extractive uses wt�ich are low-intensity and
preserve fhe environment may be co'nsidered as conditional uses.
� �
Single Farruly Residential �. ��`
so�Fr� � =z �_, � ��. � � �
�
Description -This designation is the predominant land use category in the City. Maintaining and
. . :
creating a diverse arrangement of interconnected subdivisions; neighborhoods and communities
that have a mix of densities and housing fypes; linkages wifh other residential areas antl
commercial hubs through non-motorized modes, such as pedestrian and bicycling, and vehicular
modes will be encouraged.
Designation Criteria
1. Rreviously developed single fam'ily residential areas;
2. Undeveloped areas that do not meet the designation criteria for other Residential,
Commercial, Intlustrial, or Public/Quasi-Public designations; or
3. Residenfial Conservancy areas that eontain limited critical areas, are served by public utilities
(water, sewer, storm services), and meefithe development:parameters of the Single Family
designation.
Implementing Zoning Designations
OR . - - _. _. _ 2 of 751
Page �.5
DRAFT LANR USE ELEMENT UCTC}B�R 13,2Q15
Residential 1 (1 dwelling unit per acrej: Al(properties located within the Urb.an Separator 0verlay
is zoned R-1, as consistent with the King County Countywide Planning Policies.
Residential 7 (7 dwelling units per acre): All properties not located wifhin #he Ur6an Separator
Overlay is ioned R-7.
Policies
Policy LU-14. Accessory dwelling units should play an integral part of promoting infill
development and affordable housing and are therefore encouraged within fhis
land use category.
,�
Policy LU-15. Home occupations,. bed and breakfasts, day cares;;and other appropriate uses
should:be encouraged as viable accessory uses
Policy LU-16. Manufactured homes shall be permitted on single family lofs provided fhey are
sited and constructed in a manner that would blend with adjacent homes.
Policy LU-17. Provide a variety of housing typalogies to suit the needs of various potential
residents.
Policy LU-18. Densitiy bonuses, outside of the Urban Separa�or Qverlay, sf�4uld be approved
based on the innovations in transportation, stprmwater management,,;and publis
amenities propos�l far,the development`��r adjacent neighborhoods associated
with the request The;on[rs is on the developer to justify density above baseline..
Examples of amenities�and'concepts that justif� density bonuses include park
space, art, enhanced �Candscaping,����> trails fhat connect to adjacent properties,
neighbarhood�commerciai.property,set asides, use af low impact development
��.� ..
technigues beyond the minimum cotle requi�ements, ihcorporation of CPTED
concepts, and v�nation of architectuce and housing typology.
a. �^ �� ���.. ���:` � � � � . � �.� :� w
;;F�@SI��t1�#���T�[1S�'��?� � � � � � � � �
� - � �, a
��� ��� ��, ��� :�-�-. � ��� : ��. � � � :`'� � � �� ����
�, '.
v:
Descript[an,N Resident�al iran&ition areas,are planned to accommodate moderate densities of
Y . �
varying residential dwelling type.'s,. Varying=intensities within a fransition area may be permitted
based on adjacent densit�r, intensit�+; andlor character:Appropriate densities in these areas range
from 7 to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single family dwelling to
multiple-family dwellings;-with larger structures allowed (wifhin the density range)where offsetting
community benefits can�e identified.
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed moderate density residential areas; or
2. Areas that provide a transition between single family and multi-family,single family and non-
residential, rnulti-family and non-residential zones or developmerrt, are adjacent and meetthe
developrnenf parameters of the Residential Transition designation,
Implementing Zoning Designations
OR : _ _ 3of751
Pa � e � 6
�€���T c.�r��us�������vr c�c�o�����,za�s
Residential Transition
Policies
Policy LU-19. Density bonuses and flexible development standards should be considered as an
incentive for innovative neighborhootl design.
Policy LU-20. Carefully developed low intensity office, or residentially related commercial uses
(such as day care centers)can be eompatible.
Rolicy LU-21. Accessory dwelling units should. play an integral part of promoting infill
development and affordable housing and are therefore encouraged within this
land use category.
� �ti �
Mi��i-Fam�ly A,�' _
Description - This category shap. be applied to those areas which are either now developetl or
are reserved for multiple family dwellings. DensitieS may range from 2b to 24,units per acre.
These communifies are served by transit, have nan-motorized connections io surrounding
amenities and services, or have access to on-site ame�ities.
Designation Criteria �
1. Previously developed high densify resitlential or rnanufactured%mobile home parks;or �.
, ,,
2. Froperties that ars connected to Single-Family,and non-residential designations bythe
Residential Transition designation and meet the development parameters of the Multi Family
designation.
Implemenbng,Zoning Designations
Resitlential 20 (20 dwelling units�per acre): Afl.Multi-Family designated land not previously
developed=as manufactured/mobile home parks are zoned R-20.
Manufacturetl/Mobile Home Park: All previously developed manufacturedlmobile home�parks are
zoned R-RH. �� '� �, ��
Policies
Policy LU-22. Development regulations should include densify bonuses and flexible
development standards to incentivize innovative site and building design,.
incorporation of open space and public art, non-motorized connectivity to parks
and commercial areas, proximity to transit services, supplemental natural
resource protection, supplemental use of CPTED, and supplemental use of low
impact development techniques.
Policy LU-23. Home occupations and shared housing should be allowed in fhis designat'ion,
however, given the high densities, it is appropriate to establish addifional
restrictions, procedures, and requirements in order to ensure that they are
compatible with their surroundings and do not adversely affect the community.
OR _ 4 of 751
Pa � e � 7
��t,4FT LAND llSE ELEMEN7 t?CTt?BER 13,2015
_ _ _
Poliey LU 24. Live-work units are encouraged.
Policy LU-25. Improve the quality of low income neighborhoods and implement programs which
encourage rehabilitation of deteriorating structures and facilities the Downtown
area; areas beiween lower density residential uses and more intense non-
residential acfivities; antl areas with high levels of transit service and available
high-quality services,
Policy LU-26. Multi-family development should be subject to building and site design standartls.
These standards should address the appearance of buildings, compatibility with
nearby uses, exterior lighting, connectivity with surrounding properties and uses;
the relationship between ground floor spaces,, and entry ways with the
���..
streetscape, and connectivity to nearby nor� res�dential hubs (e.g. shopping
centers and schools),
�e,
Poliey LU-27. Provide a va�iety of housing typologies to suit the needs of various potential
residents.
Policy LU-28. Establish intensity Iimitations. such as floor area ratios,:�density, building height;
,
coverage ratios,setbacks, antl o�herstandards.
��- w,..
Poliey LU-29. Access to nearby amenities and thealth and.; human seririces should be
considered when revi�wing�senior housing developments. �
� € :,o
Policy LU-30. Encourage developmerrt� of permanent supportive housing to address the
homeless population and those;with,special needs.
Policy LU-31. Encourage adaptive reuse; particularly of historic properties.
ft
.�. �; � =
�
_ �� __. .� g �... � ,�� �.�.._ �
�. _�_. . .,
_; ��:
� � � � � � �� � �.
�Ibixetf�l��� � ��: '� � �� ��- � � _
��� � � _ - � �
�.E
Desaipt�on ; Tf�is•category shall be.applietl to thase areas which are either now tleveloped or
are reserved� for multiple��family duv�llings. Densities rnay range from 2Q to 24 units per acre. ' �
These�t�mmunities� are`���erved byi��tra�sit, have� non=motorized conn�ections to� surrounding
amenities antl services, or h�ve.access ta.on-site non-residerrtial amenities and services.
. �ri
Designation Cri�teria
1. Previously develaped hig#�:density residential; or
�.. ,
2. Properties that are conn�cted to Single-Family and non-residential designations by the
_ _
Residential Transition designation or are adjacent to the Multi Family designation, and meet
the development parameters of the Mixed Use designation.
Implementing Zoning Designations
Mixed Use Resitlenfial
Policies
Policy LU=32. Development regulations should include density bonuses and fle�ble
development standartls to incentivize innovative site and buildin desi n,
OR : 5of751
Page � 8
DR�FT LA�lD tJSE EL.EMEiVi' C?C7CIBER 13,2015
- - -
inco�poration of open space and public a�t, non-motorized connecfivity to parks
and commercial areas, proximity to transit services, supplemerrtal natural
resource protection, supplemental use of CPTED, and supplemental use of low
impact development techniques,
Policy LU-33. Live-work units are encouraged.
Policy LU-34. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties.
Policy LU-35. Consider rnultiple methods for determining how the mixed use objectives are
achieved. For exarnple, in some areas of the City it is acceptable to have a
horizontal mixed use design, while in other areas vertical mixed use is
appropriate.
Policy LU-36. Establish intensity limitations such as floor area ratios, density, building height,
coverage ratios,setbacks, and other standards:
,,
OR . - - 6of751
Page � 9
DRAFT LANi�USE ELEMENT OC7C)BER 13,2015
COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Gharacter Sketch:
Commercial uses will be wide ranging in terms of scale and type, A mix of businesses; local, regional,
and national, will be among the businesses in the various designations and will be carefully located to
create balance and maintain appropriateness based on adjacent uses. These commercial areas will be
economically vibrant, unique and be active outside of traditional work hours. They will be accessible by
foot, bike,car, and public transport.
Values:
Character - Active gathering spaces, such as pa�Cs, plazas, cafes, concert venues, festivals and
markets, will be distributed throughout the City; these spaces will t�ee engaging and filled with people
interacting, irnespective of culture, age, or income IeyeL
Wellness - A variety of healthy food options will be pfiysically\and economically accessible to all
members of the Auburn community. �
Service-The City's resources and services are.ayailable and utilized by the business community. The
business community finds the City approachable, empathetic, and respon.sive. An open and
collaborative dialogue exists to help identify problem`s_ and fnd solutions.
�
.
Economy - A wide compliment of,re#ail, service and d�ning options will cater to local needs, attracts
visitors and encourages consistent`patron�ge of local busine�ses,
Celebration - Auburn will have a tliriving antl expanding arts and culture community. There will be
events,amenities; and attractions that draw people to congregate and socialize.
Environment • Local.businesses benefit from Auburn's collection of natural resources antl amenities
because residents=and���visitors��are choosing Auburn as`their��home or desti�n�ation.
,
Sustainable - Local businesses'benefit from, and contribute to, a sustainable economy because
Aubum is an easy location to,stait up;maintains opportunity for growth, and has a business friendly
economic climate.
General Policies
Policy LU-37. The commercial uses permitted must be carefully regulated in regards to performance
. `��eriteria and design. _
Policy LU-38. ,Permitted uses would consist of local-senring and community-serving retail trade,
offices,,personal'services, and eating establishments.
Policy LU-39. Encourage,uses that provide health and human services to the adjacent community.
Policy LU-40. Encourage�adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties,
Dovim#own Urban Centerp �,{ �.2 � .
Description-This category should be applied exclusi�ely in Downtown Auburn. The area should
be developed in a manner which is consistent with and conducive to pedestrian-oriented
activities. The ambiance of the downtown should encourage leisure shopping! provide services to
local residents and_area_em lo :ees,_ and royide amenities that attract re ional visitors and._
OR . 7of751
Page � 30
DRAFT LANC3 USE EL�iY1ESUT C?CTOBER 13,2015
shoppers.
-- _
Designation Criteria
1. Located within the Urban Center boundaries established by the King County Countywide
Rlanning Policies or within the Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundaries.
Implementing Zoning Designations .
Downtown Urban Center
Policies
Policy LU-49. Vertical mixed use should be encouragetl; the location of retail sales and
services should predominately be on the ground,floor with, residential or more
retail or seNiees above. However, small free standing commercial spaces may
be established as an accessory use"to a larger verticaf mixed use tlevelopment.
Policy LU-42. Deviations of height, density or intensity limitations should be allowed when
supplemental amenities are incorporated into site and building design. Examples
of a.menities inclutle use of low impact de�elopment; use of sustainable site and
building techniques; public space and art, transit oriented development,
landscaping and lighting;and bike shelters.
Policy LU-43. Encourage a broad mix of' uses within the Downtown area. A wide range of
consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation
since creating_ an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis.
Permittetl uses include retail trade;offices, personal services, eating and drinking !
establishments;fnancial instifutions;governmental`offices, and similar uses.
Policy LU-44. Encourage.,multiple:.family dwellings, particularly within the upper stories of
buildings. `
�� . . . �.
Policy LU-45. Drive-in windows=should not be permitted to maintain the area's pedestrian
environment.
Policy LU-46. Parking standards withi.n the downtown should reflect the pedesfian orientation
of the area, buf also consider parking's impact foreconomic development.
Policy LU-47. Discourage uses whieh rely on direct aecess by vehicles o� involve heavy truck
iraffic(other than for merchandise delivery).
Policy LU-48. Unsigh�y outdoor storage and similar ac6vities should be prohibited.
Policy LU-49. The downtown should capitalize on opportu.nities for multi-modal transportation.
Policy LU-50. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of histonc properties.
, m .
� .
Neighborhood_Commercial �.$ _
Descrip6on - Low intensity, small-scale commercial services that meet the daily needs of and
com lement fhe uali of the residential nei hborhoods the serve: Commercial uses need to be
OR _ 8of751
Page � 11
DRAFT LAN(?USE ELEMENT QCTOBER 13,2015
carefully located (if located within single family residential neighborhoods) or should be buffered
from single fam'ily residential areas. These areas are characterized by lower traffic generation,
fewer operating hours, smaller scale buildings, and less signage than light commercial areas.
Designation Criteria
1. Located along arterial or sollector streets;
2. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping,
environmerrtal features,or the Residential Transition designation; and
3. Meets the development paramefers of the Neighborhood Commercial designation.
Implementing Zonin.g Designations
Neighborhood Commercial
Policies
Poliey LU-51. The commercial uses permitted must be carefully regulated in regards to
performance criteria and design. Arehitectural-_style, building���height and size,
lighting, and signage should be consistent" with the surround'ing residential
properties. , � ���"= .
Policy LU-52. Rermitted uses would consist�of small scale local-serving and community-serving
retail t�ade,offices, personat services, and non-drive thru eating establishments.
Policy LU-53. Special �mphasis will be di;rected at those,accesso.ry activities which can alter
the char�acter of these areas into,heavier commercial areas. Examples include
outdr�or storage, location and screening of trash receptacles, loading and
unloading zones, and parking lots. Regulations and permit condifions will employ
:,
„_. techniques that mifrgate light and `noise impacts associated with surrounding
residentiaf properties: ,
. � . .
t,.
..
PolicyLU-54. Enco�rage adaptive�reuse of exisbing residential buildings and historic properties.
,, .h,
Policy'LU=55. Commercial;uses will have an orientation that is directed towards adjacent public
' . streets while also providing'pedestrian and bike oriented access.
Policy LU-56. �. Upzone requests to fhe next zone should be approved based on the innovations
in transportation and stormwater management and publie amenities proposed for
the developmente`associated with the request.
____ __ ___
�. :
�Lig#rt Commercial� �� r
�,:. � � �
Description - This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate
scale eommercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner which is
consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. Such areas should encourage
walkability, leisure shopping, engaging publie space, and should provide other amenities
conducive to attracting shoppers.
OR . 9 of 751
Page � 12
D�tAFT LAiVD USE ELEM�IVT QCTOBER 1�,2015
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed light commercial areas buffered from more intense commercial or
industrial designafions by landscaping or environmental features; or
2. Located along arterial or collector streets;
3. Properties that are buffered irom the Single Family designation by landseaping,
environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation; and
4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Commercial designation.
Implementing Zoning Designations
Light Commercial
Policies -�� � � �
Policy LU-57. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services.a�e:compatible within this
designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary
emphasis. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and communify-serving
retail trade, offices, personal services, eating establishments, financial
institutions, govemmental offices, and similar uses. "
Policy LU-58. Parking lots must be loca#ed _a.nd designed in a manner that softens their
appearance from adjacent pu6lic roads. This is accomplished through
landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the locatian of buildings on the property.
Where practicable, low impact develapment techniques and landscaping should
be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration�and shading of hard surfaces.
Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of
permitted use. __
Poliey LU-59. Development incentives sf�ould be established that encourage the creation of
� electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational
- practices, development of non=motorized infrastructure, and proximity and
connection to public transit.
.
Policy LU-60.: Multiple famity dwellings are only allowed as part of mixed-use developments
where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as
within the upper stories of buildings.
Policy LU-61. Drive in.windows should only be al.lowed accessory to a permitted use, and only
when carefully sited under the administrative use process, in order to ensure that
an area!s pedestrian environment is not compromised.
Policy LU-62. Large scale regional cetail uses and uses which rely on tlirect access by vehicles
or involve heavy truck traffc (other than for merchandise delivery) are not
appropriate in this category.
Policy LU-63. Unsightiy outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited.
Policy LU-64. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties.
Policy LU-65. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations
in trans ortation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed.for
OR . O of 751
Page � 13
DRRFT IAND USE ELEMENT ACTOBER 13,2Q15
the development associated with the request.
Heavy Commeraaf `
Description - This category is intended to accommodate uses that would also accommodate a
wide range of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or vehicular movement.
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed heavy commereial areas;or
2, Located along majorarterial streets;
3. Properties that are buffered from the Si�ngle Family designation��by landscaping,
environmental features,or the Residenfial Transition designation and buffered from all other
Residential designations; and
4. Meets the development parameters of the Heauy Commercial designation.
Implementing Zoning Designations m . '�
�. .,.
Heayy Commercial: All Heavy Commerc�al.:designated lantl not located within the Northeast
.a..:
Auburn Special Planning Area or located within the;,Northeast Auburn Special Planning Area, but
incapable of ineeting the C-MU zoning reguiremer�s,
Pol_icies ,: , � _ ��
Policy LU-66. A wide, variety of commerc"ial"senrices orienfed are appropriate within this
category.` This includes, but is: :not limited fo regional scale retail and
- entertainment uses, commercial�:uses with outdoor sales areas, drive-in
., ,
' - restaurant or other,drive in eommercial businesses, and commercial senrices with
outdoor storage as an accessory use.
Policy LU-67. Parking lots must �6e located and designed in a manner that softens their
appearance from adjacerit public roads. This is accomplished through
landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property.
Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should
be used.to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces.
_ _
Minimum and,maximum parking rafios must be established for each type of
permitted use.
Policy LU-68. Development incentives shoultl be established that encourage the creation of
electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational
pcactices, developmerrt of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and
connection to public transit.
OR . 1 of 751
Page � 14
DR�FT tAi�JO USE EIEiVlENT OCTOBER 13,2Q1S
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Character Sketch:
Industrial uses will become a more integrated part of the physical and social life of the City. Since so
many people work in these areas and these companies contribute so much to the fnancial life of the
city, it is important that they are connected through paths, roads and by public transportation. Locations
that have access to rail and highways that also encourage intelliger�growth patterns will be prioritized..
Innovation will be a key requirement of new and infill projects as the City looks to mitigate impacts of
production and limit damage to the environment..
Values:
Character - Buildings, landscaping, and outdoor spaces will be attractive, interesting, well designed,
and maintained.
Wellness - Risk to life and property from all hazards will be.minimized. Properties and businesses are
connected to non-motorized corridors which offers alternative means to commute:
_ ___ __ _
Service - The city works closely with individuals and organizations to fully understand the demands,.
needs, and concerns of the industrial community so that the City can sponsor initiatives that help aid in
their success.
Economy - Cornerstone institutions will strategically expand.in regional prominence. As industry
grows, land use policy will support efforts ta,grow within Au�urn. � �� �
Celebration - The Community will be made°aware of antl celebrate the accomplishments of our local,
regional and international leaders in manufacturing; ware.housing, and disfibution,
Environment • The built environment will fit into the natural Jandscape in a way that protects and
respects ecosystem function. Natural resource protection will be supported and celebrated by City
leadership and the community.
Sustainable - lndustrial uses are contributing to, and supportive of, efforts to build and maintain a
transportation system that ensures the people and goods move safely throughout the City and beyond.
General Policies '
Polisy LU-69. A wide range of industr�ial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. I'
Policy LU-70.. Outside storage shall be permitted subject to performance criteria addressing its
guantity and locafion.
Policy LU-71. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric
car charging stations, use of sustainable building antl/or operational practices,
development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public
transit
�., ti
L�ght.lndustrial �-
Description - This category is intentletl to accommotlate a wide range of industnal and
commercial uses. This designation is intentled to provide an attractive location for manufacturing,
processing and assembling land use activities that contribute to qualify surroundings. A wide
vanety of a ro riate commercial_uses_in.this designation_beneft from the location, access,
OR . 2of751
Page � 15 ,
��;a�T�.ar�o us��iEnn�rvr oc�ros��a.s,zoxs
physical eonfiguration, and building types of these properties. It is distinguished from heavier
industrial uses by means of performanee eriteria. All significant aetivities shall take place inside
buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictiy eontrolled and
permitted only as an incidental part of another use.
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed light industrial areas;or
2. Located along high visibility comdors;
3. Provides buffering for heavy industrial areas or is buffered from the Single Family designation
by landscaping,environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and
buffered from al_I other Residential designations;�and �
4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Industrial designation.
Implementing Zoning Designations y
Light lndustrial �
Policies
Policy LU=72. A wide range of indusfial uses may be permitted, subject to performance
standards. Heavy `commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in light
� � �industrie;s are also� �ppropnate�„These uses���include indoor manufacturing,
processing, and assembling of"materials from previously prepared or raw
materials and`ancilla_ry and ,necessary warehousing and dist[ibution of finished
goods,.associated with manufacturing and industrial,uses.
Policy LU=7�3. ParRing����lots must be� located ar�d designed in a manner that softens their
�land crance'pedestriancs aces,ba'ndrthe Iocationlof'buildin9mplished. through
pp J p
' __ .ap g p. . s on the property.
; " Where'practicable,Jow impact development tech.niques and landscaping should
� ` be used to�promote��on site stormvvater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces.
� `,. Minimum and maximum. pa�king ratios must be established for each type of
����, permitted use. `� � � ��
Policy LU-74. La.ndscaping, sidewalks, and bike paths will be integral parts of site design if a
development is located on an impression corridor or located within or adjacent to
an ideritified�non=moforized corridor.
Policy LU-75. Outside'storage shall be permitted subject to perFormance criteria addressing its
quantity and location. This is to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses, so that
such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light
industry. In all cases, such storage shall be extensively screened.
Policy LU-76. Where a light industrial use is located adjacent to a property with a less intense
zoning designation, the light industrial use bears the burden of incorporating
techniques that mitigate the visual, noise, dust, and odor impacts.
Policy LU-77. Uses involving substantial storage or processing ofi hazardous materials, as well
as substantial emissions, should notbe permitted in these areas.
Polic LU-78. A wide ran e of commercial activities ma be allowed to rovide increased
OR . - 3of751
Page � l6
DRAFT lAN[}USE EI.EMENT OCT�IBER 13,2Q15
opportunities for sales tax revenue.
Policy LU-79. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad Auburn Yard located within
the Railroad Special. Rlan Area is considered a compatible use at its current level
of usage. It is not bound 6y the policies concerning outside storage under the
existing light industrial designation as it was an existing use prior to the
development of this policy. Should BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to
upgrade the yard to an intermodal facility, the proposal will be subjeet to the
essential public facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element
Policy LU-80. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations
in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for
the development associated with the request.
,� .
H'eavy Industrial ;
Description - This designation allows fhe full range of indusfial uses, as well as certain heavy
commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in light industries are also appropriate.
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed heavy industrial areas;or
2. Not located along high visibility comdors,
3. Is buffered by the.Light'industrial Designation or otherwise buffered from all other eompatibte
designations; and
4. Meets the development parameters of the Heavy lndustrial designation. �
Implementing Zoning Designations
Heavy Industrial
Policies
Policy LU-81. While this zone should be reserved primarily for the heavier forms of intlustrial
activities, a wide range of industrial activities may be permiited. These heavier
forms of industrial activities may include outdoor or semi-enclosed
manufacturing; processing, or assembling activifies, significant outdoor storage,
and uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials.
Heavy commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in heavy industries are
also appropriate.
Policy LU-82. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manne� fhat softens their
appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through
landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on fhe property.
Where practicable, low impact development techniques and lantlscaping should
be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces.
Minimum antl maximum parking ratios must be established for each e of
OR . 4 of 751
� a � � � i�
DRAFT LAND USE ELEME�IT C?CTt7�ER 13,2Q1S
_ _ _ _ __--_ . _ - - -_ __ -
permitted use.
Policy LU-83, Landscaping, sidewalks, and bike paths will be irrtegral parts of s'ite design if a
development is located on an impression corridor or located within or adjacent to
an identified non-motorized comdor.
Policy LU-84. Where a heavy industrial use is located adjacentto a property with a less intense
zoning designation, the heavy industrial use bears the burden of'incorporating
techniques that mitigate the visual; noise, dust;and odor impacts,
,. ._ `.,,
. ,
OR . 5 of 751
Page � 18
pRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTQBER 13,2Q1S
PUBUC AND INSTITUTIONAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Character Sketch:
Fublic and institutional uses will occur in both low and high density environments. For passive uses,
land and views will be protected; limited access to these areas will be typical. For more active uses,
usability and accessibility will be key features and new de�elopment will be subject to standards
reflecting programmed space and 'inte�connectivity. These spaces will be varied in type, providing
serviee to areas large and small, urban and more rural in character. Sustainable solutions and
innovations that are responsive to the native ecology will be typical of public and institutional uses.
Values:
Character • Community facilities and programs bring people together and connect residents and �
visitors to our natural resources.
Wellness - Multiple recreation options; and nearby trails, parks, activities, and events will be readily
accessible to fhe entire community.
Service - Land use policy supports the provision of community, health and human services to all
residents.
Economy - Residents and visitors seek Auburn as a residence or destination because of its natural
resources, community events, and community pride.
Celebration -We utilize our open spaces and public facilities to promote who we are, our diversify, and
our community pride.
Environment - Residents and visitors will'enjoy opeir spaces and environmentally sensitive areas,
while encouraging the appreciafion of their irnportance and beauty. Impacts of new development on
natural resources are considerate of their sensitivity and importance:.
Sustainable - Public and priVate funds are used to make investrnents in land preservation, restoration
and protection. Public investments in land and �facilities are considered for their perpetual or
generational value versus short term motivations..
Generaf Policies �
Policy LU-85, The primary purpose of this designation is to address public needs while taking
advantage of synergies with the adjacent areas where they are sited.
Policy LU-86. Innovative strategies to integrate the uses and sites into the areas where they are
sited is encouraged.These strategies should ma�cimize use of the site while minimizing
fiscal irnpacts and impacts to adjacent areas.
Policy LU-87. Increase visibility of resources through public information campaigns,
Policy LU-88. Appropriate uses include low intensity recreational uses, passive use open areas,
protected environmental habitat; stormwater detention facilities, and similar low
intensity uses.
r,t _. � � �
�
Open vSpace. . � � ��� � � � ,
Description - This category shall be applied to areas which are owned by a publie entify and
managed in a largely undeveloped character. It includes parks, watersheds, shoreline areas,
significant wildlife habitats, storm_drainage onds, utili. corridors with public access, and areas
OR . ; 6 of 751
Page � 19
DRAFT LAtVD USE ELEMEN7 QCTOBER 13,2015
with significant developmer�restrictions.
Designation Criteria
1. Passive parks or undeveloped Parks Department property;
2. Any site containing a signific.ant developmerrtal hazard;or
3; Any site containing open space value suitable for public protection without unduly
encroaching on private property rights.
Implementing Zoning Design.ations
Open Space .
Policies
Folicy LU-89. Active parks that provide sports field, activity and community centers, cemetery's,
and public buildings should not be designated as open space.
Policy LU-90. Open space lands are primarily designated to provide wildlife and aquatic habitat,
flood detention,vegetation and soil pceservation;and view shed protection. Land
designated as open space may be used for public access to trails, interpretive
ceMers, education-;opportunities, and other uses and facilities that support the
purpose of their designation. �
Policy LU-91. Increase disfiibution of open space and increase:accessto open space amenities
throughout Auburn. `���� � � �
Policy LU-92. Enhance restoration, preserVafiion and protection of natural resources and critical
areas:. _
Policy LU-93.___ Seek oufi�opportunities to develop recreation and education opportunities on
public lands.or tHrough public-private partnerships.
, , _.
Policy.LU-94. Increase visibilityr ofi resources through public information campaigns. Continue to
work with regional pactners to develop and mair�ain trail systems that connect
, Aubum v�nth regional desUnations.
Policy LU 95: 'Build on partnerships with school disficts to expa.nd public use of school facilities
`for�recreation and exercise, and to improve public access to facilities for this
purpose,as appropriate.
�:§ �.,
lii�btut�qnat w ; � . � � �� �� � _ ;:� �� . =
Description - This category includes those areas which are reserved for public o� institutional
uses,These public uses include public schools and instifutional uses such as large churches and
schools, It is also intended to include those of a significant impact, and not those smaller public
uses which are consistent with and may be included in another designation. For example, public
uses of an industrial character are included in the industrial designation, and small scale religious
institutions of a residential character are included in fhe residential designation. �
OR : - 7 of 751
Page � 20
DRAFT I.AND USE ELEME�VT t}C7C�BER 13,2015
Designation Criteria
1. Previously developed institutional uses; or
2. Located along major arterial streets;
3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping,
environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and bufferetl from all other
Residential designations;antl
4. Meets the development parameters of the Institutional designation.
5, Properfies identified in the AirportMaster Plan as Landing Field.
Implementing Zoning Designations
Institutional
Landing Field
Policies
Policy LU-96. A responsible management entity and ,the purpose for the ,institutional
designation should be identified for each property intere.st within this designation.
Management policies:and,plans are appropriatefor all lands in this designation.
Policy LU-97. Appropriate uses for this designation include facilities that seNe the needs of the
larger community such as public schools, active parks, city operated municipal
facilities, largechurches, and fire stations.
Policy LU-98. This designation permits a wide�array of uses that tend to be located in the midst
of other dissimilar uses. For this reason, speciat emphasis should be directed at
the following:
a. The appropriateness of new requests for this designation and the impacts
that it may fiave on the suirounding community.
b. Site specific conditions that should be attached to the granting of new
requests fa�r this designation that are designed to mitigate impacts on the
surrountling community.
c. Site specific ,conditions that should be aitached to development proposals
that are designed to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community.
Policy LU-99. Coordination with other public or institutional entities is essential in the
implementation of the institutional land use designation.
Folicy LU-100. Industrial and commercial uses which are affiliated with and managed by
educational insfitufions for vocafional educational purposes may be classified as
an institutional use and permitted on a conditional baSis.
Policy LU-101. For the Landing Field designation, an Airport Master Plan should be developed
that establishes the vision, policies, and implementation strategies that govem
uses, management principals, and future planning efforts. Uses and aetivities
within and surrounding this designation must comply with the requirements of the
Federal AviationAdministration (FAA).
OR : 8 of751
_ aage � 2_1
��,��r wNa u�����nn��u�r r�cr€����i�,Zoa.�
_ _
OVERLAYS, URBAN GROWTH AREA,AND SPECIAL PLANNING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Character Sketch:
These areas help conVol growfh, protect the environment, and prevent urban sprawi conditions in our
_
City. For a variety of reasons, specific areas exist within the City that require further specificity or focus
of land use planning, policy, regulation, or investment. Ove�lays, u�ban growth a�eas, and special
planning areas may be designated that help further enume�ate a pu�pose. These areas are to be
designated through the Comprehensive Plan and treated as a component of the Land Use Element of
the Plan.
Values: Each area that is designated as an overlay, urban growth area; or special planning area shall be
reflect the values identified in the Core Gomprehensive Plan.
General Policies
Policy LU-102: These land use designations musf be consistent with=the Growth Management Act
(GMA)�Puget Sound Regional Council, and countywide planning policies.
Policy LU-103; Any proposed changes to these designations must be pursued in coordination with
applicable State, Regional and County agencies..
_ ��._ .._ . ��__ e e � m _ _ . .__ __
Urban Separator � � � � � � � � ��
4j g<
Description -Urban separators are areas des.ignated for louv-density uses in the King County
Countywide Planning Policies::Tt�ey are intended to-be"protect Resource Lands,the Rural Area,
and environmentally sensitive areas, and create open space and wildlife corridors within and
between communities while also proiriding public health, environmental,visual, and recreational
-
benefits."There are two pnmary„areas of.urban sepa�ators,one on Lea Hill and one on West Hill.
:. - . ,
�� � �.
��
Design_ation Criferia `���. �
1. Areas,designated th"rough the process of annexation.
�.;
Implementing�Overlay Designations
Lea Hill Overlay
West Hill Overiay
Urban Separator Overlay
Policies
Policy LU-104. The Gity is obligated to maintain (and not re-designate) until at least the year
2022, pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies and an annexation
agreement with King County.
Policy LU- 1 U5. U�ban separators are deemed to be both a regional as well as local concern and
no modifications to development regulations governing their use may be made
without King County review and eoncurrence.Therefore,the areas designated as
"urban se arator�on the Com rehensive Land Use m , will be zoned for
OR . _ 9of751
Page � 22
t7RAFT IR�1D USE�LEMEtUT C3CT�BER 13,2035
densities not to exceed one dwelling unif per acre, with lot clustering being
re.quired if a subdivision of land is proposed.
Potent'ral Ann�xaatian Area ' = s
,� �
� , . �-. ��_ �; �r . �� � �� � �. '�: ;
Description - Potential Annexation Areas are aceas located outside of the municipal city limits of
Aubum. They are areas that are anticipated to be inco,rporated into the City within 10 years of
their designation.
Designation C_riteria - Potential Annexation Areas are jointly developed by cities and the County
in which they are located. They are based upon countywide growth projections that are divided
between all ofthe urban growfh areas within the respectiue County.,.
Implementing Designations
Potential Annexation Area
Policies
Policy LU- 106. Auburn's Potential Annexation A�ea(PAA}is shown on Map XX. Map�X also
depiets Growth ImpacfiAreas: These Growth Impact Areas are generally
� adjacent cities or uninrarporated County lands in whieh developmenf that oceurs
� potentially.impacts�the city�af Auburn: ��� �_ �`��� �
��
Policy LU- 107. The Auburn City Council maY revise the boundaries of the Fotential Annexation
Area in fhe future, in:response to:
a. Amentlments to;the King or Pierce Gounty Urban Growth Area as specifed in
fhe King or F�ierce°County Countywide Folicies
'b 'Discussions,. between Auburn and adjacent jurisdictions regarding PAA
boundaries
c. Discussions with' P'rerce County concerning fhe designation of PAA
bountlaries ,� � �
tl. �,Ghanged circumstances relating to popu.lation and employment growth and
projections; urban service feasibility, or similar factors.
� _
'�rans�t�Qn t?�erlay � ` , � - -
-
,
� ., � ; ;
.-
�� � __ .�� ,. � � a�
�..
Description—Transition Overlays are areas that do not have a Residential Transition land use or
zoning designation but still require additional emphasis between two different land use
designations.
Designation Criteria—Areas shows on the Cqmprehensive Plan land use map that are located
between single family and multi family designafions, beCwieen multi-fam'ily and non-resitlential
designations;and beiween single family and non-residential designationS.
OR . 0of751
I� age � 23
DFtAFT IAND IiSE EI.EiVfENT C3C�C96ER 13,2015
Implementing Designations �
Transition Overlay
Policies
Policy LU- 108. Between singlefamily and multi=family:
. a. VUhere a mwlti-family ase is proposed to be locafed adjacent to a single
family zone,the multi-family use will bear the burden of providing an
adequate transition of fand use. Mitigating measures that control light, noise,
and dust should be incorporated into multi-family development proposals..
b. Provide non-motorized access through th�Transition Overlay in order to
connect the adjacent land uses.
c. Housing size,type, and orientation shall be utilized as a means of providing
harmonious transition of the built environment =
d. Provide a mix of townhornes;duplexes, cottage housing�and small scale
multi-family housing.
e. Rezones to the Residential Transifiion zone shoultl not be allowed:if it will
� ,�, _ , �
result in the cre�tion of.a Residen�a�l T,ransition island. `
.,_ .;.
Policy LU- 109�. Between�multi-family a�d'non=residential ��� �
� � .
�� ,,.: ��
� a. Where a non-resident�al�use is propQsed to be�l�cated�adjacentto a multi- �
�
family zc�ne,the non residential use will bear the burden of providing an
a�equate trar�sition of land use Mitigat�rig rrreasuresthat control light, noise,
and�dustshoul��be'i�neorporate,tl'i�nto non-resitlential development proposals.
�w
b Prov�tle•non motoriaed access thcough the Transition Overlay in order#o
connect tlie a��acenttland uses. ��
�,
, c. I�ro�ide a mix of townhomes, duplexes, cottage housing and small scale
mu�ti=farraily hou,�ing.
�� , . _� ,�
=-_;: d. Rezones ta the Residential Transition zone should not be allowed if it will
result in the creafion of a Residential Transition island.
Policy LU- 110. Between single family and non-residential
a. Wlie�e a non-residential use is proposed to be located adjacentto a single
family zone;the non-residential use will bear the burden of providing an
adequate transition of land use. Mitigating measures that control_light, noise;
and dust should be incorporated into non-residential development proposals.
b. P�ovide non-motorized access fhrough the Transition Overlay'in order to
connect the adjacent land uses.
e. Housing size;type,and orientation shall be utilized as a means of providing
harmonious transition of the built environment
d. Cluster housi_ng in.order to ufilize natural areas as a buffer.
e. Reiones to fhe Residential Transition zone should not be allowed if it will
OR _ 1 of 751
Page � 24
��s�������.,d��������� ��������.�r����J
result in the creation of a Residential Transition island
Cr�t�ca�i4r�a t'�re�ays . ��
��� �
Description - Under the Growth Management Act cities and counties are required to itlentify,
designate and protect critical areas. Critical areas include (a) wetlands, (b) areas with a critical
_
reeharging effect on aquifers used for potable water, (c) fish and wildlife habitat conseNafion
areas, (d)frequently flooded areas, and (e)geologieally hazardous areas.
Designation Criteria — Designation of cntical areas includes both the criteria that should be
applied to the specific type of critical area as well as buffers an�tor setbacks that are necessary
for the protection of the critical area, antllor life and propert�r. Designafion of critical areas is
based on best available science as it applies to local contlitions.
Implementing Designations
We�ands
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
Frequently Flooded Areas
.n.
Geologically Hazacdous Areas
Policies
Policy LU- 111. Best available scien�e will be ufilized forthe�specific designation criteria and the
associated adopted protection standards and developmentregulations.
Policy LU- �12. Reasonable us�provisions will;be inclutled within the critical area regulations
that ensure a property owner is nat denied use of a pre-exisfing parcel, lot or
tract.
Policy LU- 113. Exemptions ta the critical a�eas ordinance should be provided for very limited and
justified circumsfances such as mai.ntenance of exi.sting land uses,work within
sorne types of ma:n made features, limited types of site invesfigation work,
emergency activities, and certain types of invasive vegetation control.
Policy LU- 114. Critical area regulations will identify the process and standards for alteration of a
cntical area and criteria related to mitigation, performance, and monitonng..
:� � . ��. � �
�Spec�at Ptanning Areas - _ �� � li�����
��` �;�
Description - "Special Planning Areas" are Districts, Sub-Areas, Impression Corridors, and
Gateways within Auburn that warrant additional emphasis in planning, investments, and polic:y
development There are a variety of reasons for tlesignating a Special Planning Area, and once
designated there are a number of different� otential outeomes. Reasons for desi natin a
OR :�_ _ . _ _-- _ Z of 751
_ _ _ � � � � � Zs
C}RAFT LAND USE ELEIVIENT C}CTClBER 13,2�15
_ _- --- - ---- - _ _ __
Special Planning Area include;
• Areas of high visibility and traffic. These areas create an impression or image of Auburn. It is
_
therefore particulariy important to ensure that they are attractive and well maintained.
Examples include Auburn Way South and major higtiway on-and off-ramp5.
• Land use activities that warrants joint planning. In addition to developing approaches and
st�ategies for the core land use acfivity,fhere may be addifional emphasis on ensuring
compatibility wifh surrounding land uses. Examples include, Green River College,the Aubum
Municipal Airport,and Emerald Downs Thoroughbred Racetrack.
o Neighborhoods in which a resident and merchant live and conduct daily business antl leisure.
Examples include Downtown, Lea Hill and Lakeland.
• Areas where there.is a focused desire to create greater physical and economic cohesiveness.
These may be large planned developments orclusters. Ezamples include Aubum North
Business Area and Mt RainierVista.
�
s Areas with an existing builf environmenf or an existing regulatory frarnework that does not�'in
itself;meet the expectations of the 7 values.fhat underscore the Comprehensive Plan.
Examples include the need for multi-modal connections between West Hil'I"and Lea H'ill into
Norfh and Dowr�own Aubum.
Designation Criteria " f
_
1. Disfricts:The geographic limit of drstricts andiareas fhat m�kke,u:p fhe Special Planning Areas
��:�
extends beyond an al�gnment with any-particular street, tr�ail,' river, stream, or other.linear
����- �_,e
com�dor. Districts '�ay�eoittain other �smaller Spec�al Planning�Areas, sucfi� as sub-areas.
Additionally, d�sfriicts are generally consisteint with the c�eography of one of the eight
�neighborhoods"� itfentified in the 2014 Cify�f�lubum Communit�r Vision Report. Generally
speaking, districts�r�'rdentified fior the purpose of creating identit�r: This means that-the land
use d�sigrrations antl �rrerarchFng policies and�implementing regulations are not going to
c��ge fram� c�ne,District�to the next. Instead,�Districts are important for event planning,
:s,
�tablishing park=and open space level af-senrice standards, and promoting community
i��ntity.
,� — � �
� a�sfriCts(S�e Map#.#� �` � � � �. �3
�. � � ��
�� y� _ ��� �
F a.�:.
� .��.:'� �.
West`�Hi[I . ' North Aubum Lea Mill.
Downtown��� South Aubum Plate�au
Lakeland Southeast Aubum
2. Sub Areas; Sub-Areas are smaller in geography than a district. Though relatively large,
multiple sub=areas may be locafed within a single district. Sub-areas allow for the refinement
and reeo nition of existing uni ue characteristics within a district Sub-areas_are irrtended to
I The eight "-neighborhoods"are ide.ntified for comprehensive planning purposes only, as neither the City nor its
neighborhoods have elected to officially designate the boundaries of City neighborhoods.
OR : 3 of 751
Rage � 26
I3RAFT tA�lC3 E1SE ELEMEIVi" t)CTC}E�;R 1�,2015
____
anticipate, support, and guide long-term growth and redevelopment though planned.
tlevelopment and a unique vision for how that,area should look and function in the future. If
can also be used to provide flexibility when fhere is uncertainty regarding how an area may
be most appropriately developed,in#he future, Sub-Area planning emPhasizes infrastrueture
development, appropriate land _uses, connectivity throughout the planned area, and
connections to mulfi-modal transpoitation opportunities outside of the planned area.
Thirty-two Sub-Areas currently exist (including the nine economic development strategy
areas discussed below): These Sub-Areas are categorized as Identified Areas, Designatetl
Areas, and Adopted Areas. Identifed areas have been identified as a Sub-Area within the
Comprehensive Plan. Designated Areas haye been designated on the Comprehensive Plan
Map, which defines detailed boundaries of the area. Adopted Areas include an Atlopted Sub-
Area Plan that is ineorporated'into the Comprehensive Plan and establishes the purpose of its
designation, goals and policies, and implementation stra#egies. Sub-Areas can move through
the process of Identifieation, Designation, and Adaption by official acfion of fhe Auburn City
Gouncil in (three)stages or by a single action.
Onee adopted, sub-area plans are intended'.to guide the future development of each
respectively adopted sub-area on a planned. basis. Uses and intensities within Special
Planning Areas are determined for each area through individual planrnng,"procesSes. Each
Sub=Area Plan must be consistent with the general goals, `objecfives and policies.of the
Comprehensive Plan. Key policies"Fof the six Sub-Are�Pla►�s are listed below.
As an atlopted document of the Comprehensive Flan,�the`°Sub-Area Plans are subject to a
review, and if necessary, revision to address changes in :_conditions, issues, or even
characteristics of th� planned areas. A "review and reuis'ion of�Sub-Area Flan wi0 also inclutle
the review antl, if necess�ry„a revision of zoning regulatinns and design standards. Updated
and future Sub=Area Plans will either supplement exisfing goals, policies, and implement
strategies,or replace existing Comprehensive Plan designations and policies.
In 200,5, City CounciFadopted six Economic Development Strategy Areas under Resolution
Na. 3944. T�ese areas; initially identified by3 a. foeus group of diverse business and
comrriunity interests; are targeted for population.and employment growfh .within the planning
horizon of the City's 20�year'growth target (2031). Two additional economic development
strategy areas were identified in~2410. In 2012, the City CounciF added another eeonomic
development strategy area;. revised ,the planning horizon to 50 years, and modifietl the
boundaries of the economic development strategy areas to correlate the areas with areas
wifh priority`'business sectors.�The boundanes of the economic development strategy areas
are ihcorporated as sub-are�plans of the Comprehensive Plan.
�§ �z ;;�. �
_
� �. . �.
_�
� � ���.Sub Areas(See M�#.#�
� �
�
..�,E , ,�
. -
� .
��, � ���� �. m � ��...e �� .. ��� x _n_ ,
_ zJ p�
b �::
ldentified i�rea� �;., � ��; , � �� �
��� � �
� - � � ����� y ,. � �;_., � �
Aubum Golf Course GSA/Boeing Green River College
Mary Olsen Farm Les Gove Campus Emerald powns
Aubum High School
0R . 4of751
� a � � � z�
DRAFT tA6VG�USE ELEfViEIVT C�C7478�R 13,2Q15
r� }��� J ���i�� ��� �. � �
g���,l�M��Q� ��� � I�Z� z,� 4
� ��� .� �:�:£
�: :< ' .._ :, -..
.�
Auburn Environmental Park Auburn Municipal Airport 15th St SW/C St:SWIWest
Valley Hwy.N
BNSF Rail Yard A St. SE Stuck Rive�Road
M St: SE SE 312th/124t�Ave Pike Street
Auburn Way South Corridor Aubum Way North Corridor 8th Street NE
AWS/Auburn Black Diamond NW Auburn Manufactur�r�g Lakeview
Rd. Village
Mt. Rainier
� % � � � � .� �_
�: t
A�opt�d Ar� ' � �� � ��
,��� < � �
� , �,«
�
4
�� � ��,e�� . . �� , ����� ��, � _ ���
..,�. , m_� . � �.. _._. . r�
m_. _. �.�. �� � _. ..
�: �� � - - -
,� �
Downtown (Ordinance 5549) Aubum Adventisf Academy '�Auburn North Business Area
. _ �
�`� ��� (Resolution�2254� a� -�� (Resolution 2283)
Lakeland Hills(Resolution L-akeland HiIIs South (Counfiy °Northeast Auburn (Ordinance
� � 1$51) H E: Case Z1�/UP�70) ', :,�.�_, 6��183) �
3. Impression C�rridors: Impr�ssion comdors ar� a6gned with,;a particular street; trail, river,
_
stream, or spec�ic�linear corntlor. Some comdors may be part ofi a Sub-Area, in which case,
the Impression Coiridor policies are addifive:to the Sub-Area Plan: Impression comdors
enhance the areas m wh�ch residents; busine�ses, visitors move throughout the City. The
beri�f�t afi=an impression�:corri;dor is twofvld:,res'rdents know fhat the City is invested in the
�aesthetic of main`tt��rough`fa�es and businesses can build off of the design and aesthetic
pravided by the impression corridor. Improvements or modification to impression corridors
includ�-eonsist and aesthetic s"rgnage, landscaping, and monument features, and the
�;
rehabilitatit�n or removal af existing buildings and property: Impression Comdor boundarie.s
and policies,are formally designated by adoption of the Comprehensive Rlan.
� � ��_ . �� a
�
�
� � `� [rn��e�,s�an Corndars(See Map#,#j �, � ;� �``
�� �'�
� �� � � ��,
Aubum Way North Auburn Way South A Street SE/Aubum Avenue
G Street SW 15th Sfreet SW 15th Street NW/NE '
gtn Street NE Main Street Division Street
132�Street SE SE 320th Street SE 312�h Street
SE 304th Street M StreetlHarvey Road R Street
_ _ _ _
OR . 5 of 751
Page � 28
�RM�T LP�15Vti��F...�1.S.6VlR.IYT V'i.EIJULCh J..Fp GVl�
Lake Tapps Corridor West Valley Highway Auburn Black Diamond Road
Green River Road 37th Street NW S 277th Sfreet
Interurban Trail Green River White River
Mill Creek
4. Gateways: Gateways are specific places, intersections, or blocks wifhin the City. These
essential locations are established because they constitute the first impression into of Auburn.
They are therefore highly important to plan, consiruct, maintain, and enhance their
appearance and function. Gateway locations and palicies are formally designated by
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
� Gateways;(See Map#.#� °��
Auburn Way North and East Main ' Street and M All roads with an entry into
Auburn Avenue Street NE/SE the city
Auburn Way South between West Main Street between C Hw 167 Off Ram s
4th Street SE and 6th Street SE Stre.et.NW and B Sfreet NW:.:_ y p
SR 1�8�Off Ramps ��� � '� � �
. ,,, . ..
Implementing Designations
Planned Unit Deuelopment
, . � ��
Master Plans =-
Poficies� �
District Policies.
,
Policy LU- 111. Through regulation, capital investrnent, and community planning, itlentify,
k- promote and market districi identity.
Sub Area Policies: � ��
:
Policy LU- 112. Each sub area will contain its own vision, goals, policies and strategies.
Sub Area Plan Policies.
_
Policy LU- 113. Sub area plans are components of the Qomprehensive Plan. Adoption or
�evision of a sub area plan will be treated as a comprehensive plan amendment
antl will comply with the Growth Management Act; Countywide Planning Policies,
Vision 2040 and fhe Core Comprehensive Plan.
Impression Corridor Policies.
Folicy LU- 114. Create specifc plans foc each of the identified corridors that outiines
development poheies and_regulations, necessary capital improvements, and
OR . :_ _ 6 of 751
Pa � e j29
DRAFT LA9VD t15E ELElVlEIVT C�CTC?�ER 13,2015
_.__ .
-... _ - - _ - - -
implementation sfrategies. In the absence of any specific corridor plans;this
section contains general policies that are to be applied within designated
impression corridors:
Policy LU- 115. Coordinate corridor planning, design,construction, and maintenance with other
agencies, such as BNSF;the Muckleshoof Indian Reservation (MIT);antl the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDO�. Where one agency
may more efFeetively manage the corridor, management or ownership
consolidation is appropriate.
Policy LU- 116. Promote the elimination or renovation of existing derelict or unmaintained
structures, signs,fences, and properties along impression corridors through
regulatory or enfo�cement mechanisms �
Policy LU- 117. Work with private and public property owners to educate, ince.ntivize, and enforce
regu__lations that.are intendetl to improv�th�overall appearance of identified
corridors.
Policy LU- 118. Emphasize the design,orientation, construction matenals,landscaping, and site
layout for development proposals of new and existing buildtngs along impression
corridors. New construction and fhe renovation of existing buifdings create
important opportunities for enhanci�ng the appearance of impression corridors.
Policy LU-119. Esta6lish regulations that ensure coordinate�, attractive eommercial signage is of
an appropriafe size and,yuantity. Signage-regulations along these corridors may
be different than those in oihe�`areas.: ,.
.,
., . o
n.. .
Policy LU-120. Take advartt�ge of opportunities to prQv�de informational signs,wayfinding signs,
and tr�c corrtrol signs thaf are=attr�tive, useful,and integrated into a larger
.�
city wrde signage p�an or policy��� '
Policy LU= 121. OutdooF s�orage af materials;inver�ory,and gther goods and off-street surface
- };parking shou.[d be located,'�t�the rear t�f the property. Ifoutdoor storage cannot
� u : 5,
;; 'be lacated in the rear of the°pr�ertrty,then it should be screened from view from
adjacent rights a�way.
Policy�U- 1?2. Design, construct, antl enhance impression comdors 10 accommodate multi-
' , modal uses. `
Poliey LU- 123. ,D�.sign and cor��bruct vehicular access points in a manner that consolidates
access,points senring multiple uses.
:� � ... �
Policy LU- 124. Signage, landscaping, and monument features should be used to establish
prominent access points.
Policy LU- 125. Discourage aerial utilities.
Policy LU- 126. InVest in impression corridors by acquiring right of way, sonstructing and
widening sidewalKs, installing landscaping, building center medians, constructing
parklets, providing streetfumiture, and other eonstruetion improvements.
Gateway Policies. Gateways are specific places, intersections; or blocks within the City. These
essential locations are established because they constitute the first impression into of Auburn.
Gateways are intended to ereate a °welcame" into disfinct areas of the City or into the City itself.
They are therefore hi hl im ortanfto lan, construct, maintain,_and enhance their appearance_
OR -- 7of751
_. Page �30
DRAFT LAND U5E ELEMENT C7CTt2E3ER 13,2t315
and funetion. Gateway locations and policies are formally designated by adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy LU- 127. Frioritize by rank all gateways and develop potential opportunities and tlesigns
for each location.
Folicy LU- 128. Develop land use regulations that incorporate gateway priorities and concepts
into private development proposals that are located at identified gateways.
Policy LU- 129. Coordinate with the Washington Siate DeparCment of Transportation (WSDOT)to
understand options and implement actions at gateway location. Many of the
gateway locations are within the WSDOT right of way.
Policy LU- 130. Develop design layouts for gateway locations. Designs will identify key areas
that greet residents and visitors as they ente�the City or downtown center,
opportunities for signage and monument features, and landscaping.
Policy LU- 131. Maintain the established gateways.
I
OR . ` 8of751
Page � 31
�aRa�r�aN�us����nn��vr c�croe��i�,Zoss
APPENDtX A
Auburn AdVentist Academv-Adopted under Resolution 2254 on November 14, 1991
The Auburn Adventist Academy is primarily a seconda_ry school operated bjr tfie Washington
Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists. Since the school is sited on a larger comple.x that
forme�ly housed a mill, the Academy has also sought to include industrial uses that support the
mission of the school. The industrial uses provide employment opportunities, learning
experiences, and vocational education for students of the Academy. The re-use of ezisting
buildings and redevelopment of buildings lost to a fire in 1989 are the fbcal points of the
industrial development. In addifion to institutional and in8usfnal uses, the Academy is also
interested in agricultural uses for commercial and vocational purposes and currently operates
a landing strip for aviation training. The plan focuses on providing predictabiliry to planning,
zoning,subdivision,and development decisions;.made by the City� ,
Academy SPA Policies
1. All secondary uses must relate directly to the Academy's Mission Statement.
2. Bofh academie and industrial uses are to be Iocated on specifie,strategic locations on the
site to properly address existing lanci use and to be con"sistent and compatible with.
adjoining uses.
3. Steep slopes along northern boundary of the�Academy will:be �etain.ed as a natural
environment � �
4. All development must be ciriyen by the Acad_,erny and its appearance shall be consistent
with an overall open, campus=like envirorimenf.
Auburn North Business Area=Adopted under Resalution 2283 on March 2, 1992
The Auburn North Business Area Special Planning Area Plan was the result of a
comprehensive planning study due to increased development pressure north of the Central
Business.:District. Since the C,entral B,usiness District, which.contains Downtown, ttie core of
Aubum, is adjacent to these'areas, future development in this area is crucial.A comp�ehensive
and cohesive 'direction was also needed based on increased development proposals and
rezone requests. In.addition tordevelopment concems, many of the considerable undeveloped
parcels contain wetlands. All of these factors made development controls beyond zoning and
development regulations advisable.
Auburn North Business Area SPA Policies
�
1. A mix of land uses, including light commercial and multifamily residential, are the
principal uses:These uses are targeted to complement the CBD
2. Pedestrian-oriented development is advised
3: Automobile drive-in facilities,service stations, and automobile sales are not permitted
OR . 9 of 751
Page �'32
������n��us���.��n��v� c��c�����.�,zQ�s
4. Bui,ldings are designed to be.pedestrian-friendly based on building siting,frontages,
walkways,parking, and amenities
Lakeland Hilis-Adopted under Resolution 1851 on April 18, 1988
Lakeland Hills area lies between the Stuck River and the southern City limits of Auburn in the
most s.outhwestem part of the City. The area consists of planned residential and commercial
subdiyisions, and is p�edomi:nately residential in nature, offering a range of housing types,
includi.ng single fa.mily a.nd multi=famil.y dwellings. The Lakeland Hills Plan was intended to
provide long-term predictability to both the Ciry and potential developers. As a planned
communiry, development and design must be cons.ist�nt with the policy guidance of the
:
Lakeland Hills Plan. �
Lakeland Hills SPA Policies
> .
1. Higher residential densities and limifed areas of comrnercial are oriented to the lower
elevations of the area and along Oravetz Road ,
2. Higher elevations are reserved for single family residential neighborhoods
3. All commercial development must be integrated and compafible with the design of
adjacent park and residential uses
4. Future devefopments must pe designed as to;rninimize the.*potential severe erosion
hazards
Lakeland MiIIs South-Approved under Pierce County Hearing Ezaminer Case Z15/UF70
Lakeland Mills South lies south'of the Lakefand:, Hills special plan area and is the most
.. .
southvuestern part of the City..The area is predominately residential, allowing for a range of
housing� rypes, witfi��_�cQmmer"cial uses, including Lakela�nd Town Center, in �t,he center.
._
� Nonresidential uses, indutling civic;.�religious, and municipal services are allowed thcoughout
the area through an Administrative Use Permif. Unlike Lakeland Hills, Lakeland Hi�Is South was
accepted into Auburn was a'Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Lakeland, Hil.ls PUD,
originally the Lakeland Hills South Planned Development District (PDD), was approved under
Pierce County Hearing Exarniner Case no Z15-UP70 in 1990. Lakel.and Hills South PUD is
intended to provide enhanced flezibility to develop a site through irinovative and alternative
development standards. As a PUD,specific development and design standa�ds are presc�ibed.
Lakeland Hills South SPA Folicies
1, Natura.l amenities,such as open spaces and sensitive environmenfal features, should be
strategically preserved arid conducive to affordable housing.
2. Affordable housing should be provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Development should be pedestrian-oriented and encourage the use of travel modes th.at
are altemative to automobiles, such as walking, bicycling, and mass transit.
OR : _ _ _ 0of751 I
Pane � 33
DRAFT l.AI�D USE ElEN1ENT C>CTC76ER 13,2f715
4. AII devel.opment,includ.ing building atchitecture, landscaping, and site planning, shall be
subject to design review.
5: Enhance parks and open spaces should be enhanced in accordance with the Parks Master
Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Plan's non-moforized plan.
Auburn Downtown Plan -Adopted under Ordinance 5549 on May 21, 2001
Downtown Auburn is the business, governmental, and cultural hub of Auburn, its physical and
cultural heart. Many stores, restaurants, service providers, and small offices are well-
represented throughout this district. Downtown hosts many communiry events and activities,
such as the weekly Auburn International Farmers Market i�n the summer, Soundtiites! Concert
Series (in the Ciry Hall Plaza) and the Veterans.Day Parade. Downtown features public art that
indudes temporary installations such as Pianos" an Parade and a permanent outdoor
Downtown Sculpture Gallery with rotating pieces. Th.is dynarni„s,rp is possible because the
,.
district is a colleetion of uses that coexist in clase proximity to one another. Due to the val:ue,
importance, and complexity qf t.fiis district The.Auburn Downtown Plan identified fou.r general
needs to be addressed by the plan;:
. . ,-
. Update ofthe exi5fing plan in arderto,continue Downtown revitalization
• Concem overthe reopening of�Sfam'pede Pass
. Multiple I�arge projects proposed far=�owniown�
• Scarce private inv��tr�ent,
In conjunction with'p_r.oject-based,items, a regul'atory element that emerged from the goals of
the Auburn Downtoviiri Plan was�,the Downtown Urban Center(DUG)zoning distnct, which was
., �
establis�hetl in 2007.While=the DUC�otiing,district;is intended specifically to address the needs
�_. � � ���
of dc►wr�town, thaugh the implementationRof policres identi.f.ied tiy the Downtown Audu�n P/an,
� �
many challenges related,to.publie and private.tnvestment, devel.op.ment, and strategie p.lanning
�.
have yet�to.be.addressed as-downt�wn,hias eyolved.
,-'�
Downtown (DUC;a,Policies '
1. Aubum Comprehensive Rlan Ghapter 5, Section 5.X contains policies applicable to the
downtown..land use designation
....
2. Aubu�n Downtown`Pla'n, Section 1.4 contains pol.icies applicable to downtown.
3. Find creative and innovative methods to adaptively reuse existing buildings for a variery of'
uses
4. Reduce regulatorybarriers and inccease ineentives to encourage strategic development.
(i.e. "makers",small:-scale manufactunng,creative enterprises, and micro-scale restaurants).
5. Coordinate with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan to address parking and
multimodal transit options.
6: Seek out branding opportunities through signage, art p�ojects, and cohesiVe des.i.gn to help
re-enfocce Downtown character.
7. Implement improvement projects including the Main Street Corridor F�oject (20%design)
OR . 1 of 751
Page � 3_4 _
DRAFT LAND USE El.EMENT C)CTt3BE�fi 13,2015
8. Implement the Downtown Fa�ade Improvement Program, the Downtown Fa�ade
Improvement Program, and the Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan
(CDPMP).
OR , 2 of 751
Pabe � 35
Exhibit 4
AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — VOLUME 2
Housing Element
j";�m,s i,,: 1 m:�� '���� _� i .��' u�i����<�
Auburn is a place our diverse community is proud to call home for a lifetime. Auburn
provides opportunities for attainable housing in a variety of styles to meet the needs of
all ages, abilities, cultures, and incomes. Our neighborhoods are safe and attractive,
offer gathering places to meet friends and family, are connected by trails, streets, and
transit, and well-kept. Our households are aware of opportunities and services offered by
governmental, educational, employment, health, and service providers that can enhance
their quality of life. Volunteerism to improve our parks, schools, streets, and homes
makes our neighborhoods and families stronger. Our quality housing and neighborhoods
support our local economy.
����5 f��� �����'�I�����'� ,�ik�c�° I '=;���°��5 �C�'�'I:�'"P��!�'�'�.�'�`
The City of Auburn commissioned a Housing Needs and Characteristics Report (BERK 2014) to identify
community needs and develop Housing Element policies. Key findings of that report are summarized
below and led to the development updated goals and policies.
Auburn is diverse. Approximately 25%of Auburn residents speak a language other than English. This is
similar to King County(25%) and higher than Pierce County(14%). Spanish (9%), Asian and Pacific Island
languages (8%), and other Indo-European languages (7%) are the most common languages spoken other
than English in Auburn. See Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Languages Spoken at Home in Auburn, 2008-2012 5-Year Average
%of Group
Persons Without
Age 5+ English
Language Spoken at Home years %of Total Proficiency
Speak only English 48,919 75% --
Spanish or Spanish Creole 5,928 9% 48%
Otherindo-Europeanlanguages 4,385 7% 44%
Asian and Pacific Island languages 5,245 8% 42%
- Otherlanguages 943 1% 32%
Total 65,400 100% ll%
Source:2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Auburn's diverse communities may have different housing preferences, and preferences for
neighborhood amenities, and services. For example, outreach conducted with the Hispanic community
in association with the Housing Element Update showed that most would recommend Auburn as a place
ORD.E 4 � ,,; Page 163 of 751
. �
� � � ���
, . ,
� . .. �
'JRAFT HnUSiNC ELe"r'CNT OCTGnER 13,2�15
to live for family and friends and wanted their children to grow up and stay in Auburn, but desired
improved security and traffic calming. The outreach participants desired to help improve their
neighborhood and volunteer.
Auburn's household size trends show the City will need to ensure a variety of housing types
are offered to match the needs of both small and large households. Auburn has a larger
household size and average family size than King or Pierce Counties. However, household size
composition information shows a significant proportion of single persons and two persons with no kids.
Auburn also has a higher proportion of single parent households. The type of homes needed for smaller
households may be different than for larger households. See Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2
Household Composition and Average Household Size
Household Composition: Average Household Size:Auburn,
Auburn, King County, and Pierce County King County, and Pierce County
100%
90% -•, � � � ■Other Households
80% __.
Average Average
70% '--_; — ---''- �Living Alone Household Family Size
60% Size
�
50% Single Parent, Auburn 2.67 3.22
40% — Children
King County 2.40 3.05
30% �Married, No
200� �__ ' __ Children Pierce County 2.59 3.09
10% � '. --- • - ��, — ■Married,Children
;
0% -'� �_ _,.- --,
, King Pierce Auburn ',
�- _ _ --- __ _ I
Source:2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates;US Census,2010.
Auburn is affordable. Auburn has a higher proportion of its population with lower incomes, and
Auburn's housing is more affordable than the region. Rents are below King County Fair Market Rents,
and the median sales price is at least$100,000 below the King County median sales price. Almost half of
the City's households could afford the median priced home, and more than two thirds could afford the
median priced condominium unit in Auburn.
Auburn's housing stock is o/der and much of the rental housing is in fair or poor condition. Though
housing is affordable in Auburn, the City could lose some of its most affordable rental housing as �
structures near the end of their useful life. ,
See Exhibit 3 illustrating the Year Built information for the City showing older housing stock in the valley �,
and West Hill and newer housing in Lea Hill and Lakeland Hills. ,
OR . 4 of 751
- � 2
DRAFT NOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2Q15
Exhibit 3
Year Built
�� . .,. ? .
�._ _._..�.;�--•----�--,,,��� �_ _ _
� � �r 'q i- -Y •rr+�-��
�-"_�rr. � _ ��i�■
_� �._ , ;m-,�r�� _.:�
_, .
; �.. �����
, ,
i _ •� I � � _ .-�r '� ,� �.
`,.4' :a ' �
1 . . r� �,� _ . � . . ' `�
j •�� 1 � ` +��sp:� .� ,�ii���a� .
I_ W; � � ��� ��'�'�v_j� i`'�en
� . : �., . �1 �`� �s 1�- � " _ - �r.r � � '
�� J s-` 'Ti9. ,-:� °a p���t. !
� II �,,' t �.�.w:,� .(� �; . •t'.— c
AUBURN , � � � `",= - i
1 . . �w. �'r. . -` i;j�, . r._ .
m ... � y - .���
1 � ; '�"' � —� ,.f �� � � I
�,„ :. 9JI.I � �L�� .., .. .
:�I� �9���"l�.r _.+==m �j�[�—�soL'L• 'i.
r ■ � ,'9.ii+ .� ..
�i-'�eL� tj�J �'�►• a�: ��� .. ^``%
_ R
._ _..� — . . � . � i■
�• - � . . .
�
—��� -�e �+ �' ��:�'" _r.�'`�. `,:�� �� i
�;a • ,�.� =� ir' .:� ��'�;�..` "`b, - - ''
-vM . ��W6��•' �� :�_.�r.. ;�N
��_ • j+ � �`' � �°�'!'.��..�..�..�..� �r de
,���� ■ j � _ . _ '�p�II IL a �'�' �._..3 _ � �.�
„�„� _ � ^'.Y�::�_�.c,." '�,' .�: ���i"1' e
� �,.` � ' �-' "` i....._.._._ , . p��� �!�-'1:��
�� f!►�
S . P� ei.. � . �'78e, ��� , �
� ���167 ,1 ..' -�. ' �il'��� � � ■
4 �I _�J. I�� ld ��� ' [�^�'��4�' ` � �
�, ;��.'�"�..�..�.. � ���i - ,� ' ��� ��
�.il� ' 1I 71 �1��.��'1_ `� 1.�,1+i"� .
%' � �■,�t''�''� \` ` ��^
' ��• a �� /a i " L.
,. I I ;�aY�':' ^�. A':n?�'�s5j"`e,'� �.�..�..�....�.
-�- l�Il�htft�.unty ,.�.,t;��W�r �•,
� �i 1�.i+�r'r—':�u=�11f �'�.:ae1Cw","���""�-���" �'-�ti �.
1.._.._. I � �,n,�,;' ' - � � �
. .
_ . � .. �a . rJ��l ,� ,��, � .
i
i.., , , . �s . ,,,=r �
. � �, ,- ��Y_=: � ',�..`_"._.�
._.._.!' � _ '�
Residential Properties: �• {' � r' !
r �' ;� �.�A
Date Built 3 ,• �� .�.�� `�` � �
i e ���,.ol � i
., '1950 � (.. (�� �a �. '�,
z ���;�°a r � . , .,`
■ 1951-1960 KING COUNTY 1.; � ti�ti.� � ! �
■ 1961-1970 PIERCE COUNTY� ��� '���I�
1971-1980 ..� ! �`.�� � -••-.._..;
1981 -1990 +1:..! .._ •�k�' �L='Yl`m il�� � �, �,j� �- r,
��A .• � . a.r
■ 1991 -2000 1 �� v !
i.._ .�..1
. 2001 -2010 �..-•.-..-'s_g� � �
r 0 0.5 1
■ 2011 -Present �
i � i � i
■ Parks Miles
Source.King Counry.2014:Ple�ce County.^_OtJ I
Source:King County Assessor,2014;Pierce County Assessor 2014;BERK Consulting 2014
OR . 5of751
� 3
dRf±F� HOUSING ELEfJfENT C'CTOBER 13.�015
Overall,the assessed improvement value per square foot in Auburn is relatively low;see Exhibit 4.This is
likely owing to the age of much of Auburn's housing as well as its position in the overall metropolitan
market. Housing with the lowest improvement values per square foot are concentrated in the periphery
areas outside of the city center. Exceptions include northeast Auburn around 132"d SE and the Lakeland
Hills area.
Exhibit 4
Assessed Improvement Value per Square Foot
1,600 ,____ _ _ __
1,400 �---
1,200 - - -- -----
N
� 1,000 i -- - -------
� 800 ; --
� �
� 600 ;
z i
400 , -
200 + - - -
0 � � , � - � � � � � �����—,- �—� �——� �—
.-+ r.i m � �n �o r� oo rn o .� N m cr � � n oo ci o .� N m �r � � r. oo rn o .-, N m � �n �
;/).{!} tJ7.V} �V7�{!� i!} t./1�t!} a--I a--I �-�1 a--I rl ri e-1 C-1 rl r1 N N N N N N N N N N N1 ci'1 M M f+'1 M M
�C!}i!� i!�i!'n i!}i!'h t/�iJT� i/S�i/� iJS� t/}�fl7� �l/��V7� +.f}yJ} iJ}'V1� t!}i!} '(/? i/1��ll1� �(f1�N1� t/�
Improvement Value per Square Foot
A closer look at the improvement value per square foot demonstrates the distribution of housing units
in Auburn.
• There are approximately 1,600 units with no or very limited improvement value listed. '
• There is a long tail stretching towards higher improvement values per square foot,demonstrating
the presences of some higher value housing stock.
• The median improvement value (not including lots with no improvement value) is $16.73.
�L���i f i�' d S �1i E'��5&C't� �'�'u IJ.'".t ��u� a c:1 ���i�F.��'V"�a f`�; ��+�i i� ,4 r
The housing element can serve as a useful management tool to meet changing community needs for
housing, as well as to address land use, economic development, transportation, environmental and
other concerns.
• A variety of housing choices can meet the needs of Auburn's residents at all ages and affordability
levels, help residents maintain and retain their homes, and promote services and amenities that
improve neighborhood livability.
• Well planned housing can support Auburn's economic goals by attracting residents to live near their
jobs, and by serving as a source of customers to support commercial districts.
• Housing in proximity to transit or mixed-use projects can help reduce the need for costly
infrastructure (e.g. roads and sewer). Housing in proximity to a variety of transportation modes can
increase a household's disposable income and savings by reducing the cost of transportation.
• Well designed and located housing can reduce energy and water consumption, and promote healthy
lifestyles.
OR . 6 of 751
� : � a
.,.. � .'.�( .< �_. ;'a'� �,E`�. � `�, »
'��.�S��� �..��:�-��� ���x��.�; �'��������
�
POIiCy H-1. Recognize the important role of public improvements, facilities and programs in providing
a healthy home environment within the community. [HO-4]
POIICy H-2. Through integrated planning for land use, parks and recreation, transportation, housing,
and jobs, support active living and healthy eating opportunities. [Element audit, needs
assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-3. Promote safe and connected neighborhoods. [Element audit, needs assessment,
outreach]
A. Continue to implement crime prevention programs such as neighborhood block
watches.
B. Through the land use and building permit process, implement principles of crime
prevention through environmental design.
C. Promote community volunteerism to increase residents'wellbeing and safety.
POIICy H-4. Promote housing that meets the needs af Auburn's workforce, is located and designed to
support affordable multimodal transportation options, and contributes to a regional jobs-
housing balance. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-5. Provide for housing choices in Downtown and other designated mixed use centers where
infrastructure is more available or can be improved with regional and local funds.
[Element audit, needs assessment, outreach]
POIICy H-6. Improve streetscapes in developed neighborhoods. Continue to repair and/or replace
� deteriorated sidewalks and remove barriers to pedestrian traffic. [HO-30]
POIICy H-7. Seek and provide assistance for the reduction of lead-based paint hazards and measures
to remove mold, improve energy conservation and provide for healthy indoor air quality.
[Lead-based, HO-29; also housing audit]
POIICy H-$. Promote the City's neighborhood program. Connect residents to volunteer activities.
[Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-9. When evaluating proposed developments, apply site and building design standards,
require quality streetscape, landscape, onsite recreation and open space, and low impact
development measures to improve community character and environmental quality.
[Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
How can Auburn Plan far Active Living and Healthy Eating?
�, Provide for a complete cammunrty with a variety o�' �vork, shopping, recreation, h,etrlth and education, and ;
' home enviranments. ��
�
= Implement a connected non-motorized trail and park systern with neighborhoad gaThering spaces.
f
� Work with transit providers to connect neighborhoods to commercial and social services.
, Facilitate access to regiona!transportarion and job centers in and nearAuburn,
�
' Support art projects ai�d cultural events to provide apportunities to build a sense of eo�n�nunrty investment, '
s improve esthetirs, bring peopte together cross-cultura(!y, and rnvalve neighbarhood youth. �
Support communrty gardens to improve access to healthy food and to build communrty reJationships. �
�
OR . 7of751
� 5
DRAFT HOUSING ELEIt1lENT OCTOBER 13,2015
POIICy H-10. Provide a land use plan and zoning that offers opportunities to achieve a variety of
housing styles and densities for private and non-profit housing providers. [Element audit,
needs assessment,outreach]
POIiCy H-11. Promote opportunities for home ownership through single-family detached and semi-
attached housing, fee-simple cottages and townhouses, and condominium apartments.
[Element audit, needs assessment, outreach]
POIICy H-12. Allow accessory dwelling units as an affordable housing strategy. [HO-19]
POIiCy H-13. Encourage residential development in Downtown, particularly housing that is integrated
with commercial development. [HO-18]
POIiCy H-14. Implement incentives to develop underutilized parcels into new uses that allow them to
function as pedestrian- oriented, mixed-use neighborhoods. Existing uses which are
complementary, economical, and physically viable shall integrate into the form and
function of the neighborhood. [HO-26]
POIICy H-15. Use innovative zoning provisions to encourage infill development of underutilized parcels
in zones which have been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as areas where infill
residential development should be encouraged. Certain development requirements for
infill development may be relaxed, while requiring adherence to specific design
requirements to ensure compatibility with the character of nearby existing residential
structures. [HO-27]
POIICy H-16. Allow appropriately designed manufactured housing within single family neighborhoods,
consistent with state law. (HO-13J
Policy H-17. Al�ow manufactured housing parks and multifamily housing in appropriately zoned but
limited areas. [HO-14]
POIiCy H-18. Conserve Auburn's existing housing stock because it is the most affordable form of
housing. [Objective 7.7�
POIICy H-'I9. Inventory and map dilapidated properties. [public works, 2012]
POIiCy H-20. Organize, educate and assist property managers and owners in the creation and
preservation of safe neighborhoods. [HO-28]
A. Offer an owner-landlord training program to better market, manage and maintain
residential rental property. [public works, 2012]
B. Encourage retention of professional management assistance. [public works, 2012]
C. Recognize and publicize well maintained apartment properties, such as by awarding
a "multifamily property of the year." [public works, 2012]
D. Advise landlords with problem buildings about the benefits of donating their
property or selling it below market cost to a specially designated non-profit
organization. [public works, 2012]
POIICy H-21. Promote housing improvements by property owners and building managers. Seek
available assistance for housing rehabilitation. Assistance will include the development of
residential infrastructure and the rehabilitation of individual properties. [HO-20]
A. Find public and private sources of capital and offer low-interest loans for
rehabilitation. [public works, 2012]
OR . 8 of 751
, _ ' � 6
B. Continue to participate in the Emergency Home Repair Program and consider
partnering with non-governmental organizations to maximize funds. [public works,
2012]
C. Encourage green lending for improved energy conservation, indoor air quality,and
other measures. [public works, 2012]
D. Help identify professional volunteers at educational or professional associations to
plan redesign or architectural upgrades of the properties. [public works, 2012]
POIICy H-22. Evaluate and update codes applicable to housing and provide effective and appropriate
enforcement. [HO-9]
A. Enforce city ordinances regarding abandoned properties. [public works, 2012]1
B. Consider a multifamily inspection program. [public works, 2012]
C. Consider public identification of landlords who are found to be out of compliance
for extended time periods and unwilling to take steps to ameliorate substandard
conditions. [public works, 2012]
D. Consider a landlord compliance program where code enforcement penalties can be
reduced if attending landlord training programs. [public works, 2012]
POIiCy H-23. Work with park owners, managers and park tenants to develop policies and regulations to
preserve manufactured home parks and the affordable housing they offer. [HO-21]
POIICy H-24. Consider an Auburn Housing Authority. [Council Vision)
POIICy H-25. Promote affordable housing that meets changing demographic needs. [Element audit,
needs assessment,outreach]
POIiCy H-26. Work in partnership with King County and other cities to address the countywide need for
housing affordable to households with moderate, low and very-low incomes, including
those with special needs. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach]
A. The King County countywide need for housing by percentage of Area Median
Income(AMI) is:
• 50-80%of AMI (moderate) - 16%of total housing supply
• 30-50%of AMI (low) - 12%oftotal housing supply
• 30%and below AMI (very-low) -12%of total housing supply
B. Address the King County need for housing affordable to households at less than 30%
AMI (very low income),through all jurisdictions working individually and collectively.
C. Meet Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies to provide opportunities for
housing affordable to all incomes including low incomes.
D. Focus Auburn's efforts towards the countywide and community need for low and
moderate income housing on preserving existing affordable housing with robust
maintenance and repair programs, and ensuring long-term affordability of existing
housing.
1 public works,2012,Preserving Rental Housing in Auburn
OR . 9of751
= I �
[�RAFT HOUSING ELEMENT QCT08ER 13,2C915
POIICy H-27. Encourage and assist in the renovation of surplus public and commercial buildings and
land into affordable housing. Additionally, explore opportunities to dedicate revenues
from sales of publicly owned properties, including tax title sales, to affordable housing
projects. [extension of HO-22; element audit]
POIiCy H-28. Seek, encourage and assist nonprofit organizations in acquiring depreciated apartment
units for the purpose of maintaining and ensuring their long-term affordability. [HO-23]
POIiCy H-29. Review and streamline development standards and regulations to advance their public
benefit, provide flexibility, and minimize additional costs to housing. [Element audit,
needs assessment,outreach]
POIiCy H-30. Promote compliance with federal and state fair housing laws. Support fair housing
opportunities for all regardless race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or
disability. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-31. Encourage and support human and health service organizations that offer programs and
facilities for people with special needs. Support programs in particular that help people to
remain within the community, including those that are disabled, seniors, single parent
households, and the homeless. [broadened HO-1]
Policy H-32. Assist low-income persons, who are displaced as a result of redevelopment, find
affordable housing in accordance with state and federal laws and regulations. [HO-15]
POIICy H-33. Continue to ensure that funding becomes available to support youth and social services in
Auburn. [HO-31]
POIICy H-34. Support seniors who wish to age in place in their homes, such as with home rehabilitation
services, adult day health and senior center activities. [Element audit, needs assessment,
outreach]
POIICy H-35. Provide opportunities for assisted living and retirement communities. [Element audit,
needs assessment,outreach]
POIiCy H-36. Promote universal design principles to ensure housing is designed to be usable by all
people regardless of age or abilities. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach]
POIICy H-37. Provide empowering training for local residents who want to participate in civic activities
and who would like to improve their knowledge and skills around community leadership.
[public works, 2012]
POIiCy H-38. Provide information in multiple languages to Auburn's diverse communities regarding
services offered by local and regional governmental, educational, employment, health,
and other providers to improve residents' quality of life and to promote resident
engagement and household economic independence. [Element audit, needs assessment,
outreach]
POIICy H-39. Offer financial and homebuyer education to encourage household saving and budgeting to
consider home ownership. [public works, 2012]
POIICy H-40. Provide information and resources that educate and guide low-income persons toward
affordable housing opportunities. Develop materials in multiple languages. [HO-16]
POIICy H-41. Review proposals to site facilities providing new or expanded human services within the
City to determine their potential impacts and whether they meet the needs of the Auburn
community. Important caveats in the City's consideration will include the following: [HO-
5]
OR . Oof751
, �� � I $
A. While Auburn will willingly accept its regional share of facilities which provide
residential services, or influence residential location decisions,Auburn will expect
� other communities to accept their share as well.
B. The funding of human service centers sited in Auburn that serve an area larger than
Auburn would rely on an equitable regional source of funding.
C. The siting of all facilities shall be based on sound land use planning principles and
should establish working relationships with affected neighborhoods.
POIICy H-42. Partner with South King County jurisdictions in ongoing efforts to coordinate the human,
educational, and housing needs of our diverse cultural communities, such as through the
Road Map Project, interjurisdictional housing and human services forums, and other
efforts. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-43. Support national, state and especially regional efforts to address the housing and human
service needs of the region and the City. [HO-7]
POIICy H-44. Explore all available federal, state and local programs and private options for financing
affordable housing, removing or reducing risk factors, and preserving safe neighborhoods.
[Objective 4.4]
Policy H-45. work in partnership with public and private housing providers, businesses, and other
agencies in the provision of housing assistance to Auburn residents and business
employees.
POIICy H-46. Through the building permit process, inventory and track affordable housing opportunities
within Auburn. Distribute affordable housing information to nonprofit agencies serving
the homeless and low-income persons. [HO-17]
POIICy H-47. Monitor housing supply, affordability, and diversity in Auburn and its contribution to the
countywide and regional housing need. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
POIICy H-48. Review and amend, a minimum every five years, local housing policies and strategies.
[Element audit, needs assessment,outreach]
OR . 1 of 751
-- � 9
pRAFT HOUSiNG ELEMEiVT OCTCfBER 13,2tD1S
The City has developed housing objectives implementation strategies addressing housing diversity,
condition, attainability, and programs to serve special needs. See Exhibit 5. The City will monitor the
objectives over time.
Exhibit 5. Housing Objectives and Tools
Improve housing quality Increased quality of rental housing Housing rehabilitation and repair loans
Loans for energy conservation and healthy
indoor air quality
City-sponsored and non-profit property manager
programs
Housing inspection program
Code enforcement
Community volunteer program
Meet demand for new Land capaciry to meet or exceed Land use plan and zoning
housing units housing target
Promote housing ownership Maintain or increase home- Single family dwellings including small lots
ownership rates Accessory dwelling units
Cottages,tovmhomes
Allow for a variety of housing Increased numbers of small units Single family dwellings including small lots
types to meet size and age with neighborhood recreation and Accessory dwelling units
and cultural trends setvice amenities
Multiplexes,cottages,townhomes
Retention of housing stock with Mixed use zoning
larger units.
Incentives infill housing rypes
Increase opportunities for Increased numbers of ownership Accessory dwelling units
housing to�ery low,low,and dwellings available to moderate Downtown incentives
moderate income incomes
households Infill incentives
Increased mixed use development
for all incomes Permit and impact fee waivers
Increased preservation and See also"improve housing quality'above
improvement of rental housing with
long term affordability
commitments
Improved opportunities for Greater match of housing to Community services programs
special needs housing and special needs including housing for partnerships with non-profit housing providers
services all ages,abilities,homeless and non-govemmental organizations
Monitor housing supply, Address achievement of indicators Monitor in conjunction with regular
affordability,and diversity above Comprehensive Plan Updates and at time of new
countywide planning policy housing targets
OR . 2of751
r� ,, ,- � � io
i
EX�ilk31� �J
AIJ�URIV COIl�lIPREHENSIV� P�fV � \/O�lJl1/IE 3
Capital Facilities �lerr'ent
CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT VISION
Capifal Fa_cilities in Aubum are planned, designed, and consfrucfed in a manner fhaf adequately supports future
growfh scenarias thaf are predicfed in the.City's Land Use Elemenf and that meet fhe needs of residenfs, visitors
and businesses. Sustainability is a principal fhat guides decisions for where facrlities are placed,how they are
construcfed,how they are operated and mainfained, and liow all aspecfs of design, construction and operafion
are funded.
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY
Growth:The provision and sizing of public facilities such as streets o,r water and sewer lines can influence
the rate or timi.ng of development and is an impo�tant means of managing growth. Timed provision of
facilities also ensures fhat new development can be assimilated into the existing community without serious
disruptions or adverse impacts. This Plan establishes policies to allow development when and where all
public facilities are adequate or can be made adequate, and only when antl where,such development can
be adequately served by public facilities and services consistent with adopted level of service sta.ndards.
One of the key provisions of the Growth Management Act is concurrency. In general, eoncurrency seeks to
ensure that developrnent is permitted only':if adequate public facilities are, or ean be guaranteed to be,
available to support new development. Concurrency serves to place the finance function of local
government in a much more prominent role.in the land use development process. While the concept of
concurrency is new to many jurisdicfions, it has been used in Aubum since the adoption of its 1986
Comprehensive Plan.
The Act requires concurrency for transportation facilities, though, if a jurisdiction desites, it can apply to
other public facilities as welt: Concurrency requires that facilities needed to maintain a loeally adopted
� level of service be pro�ided "concurrent" with development. With respect to transportation facilities,
concu�rent is defined within the Act as being provided at tlie time of or within six years of development(this
is done to coineide with the=six year time frame of most capital facilities plans). If the facifit�r is not available
at the time of development, funding must..be availa6le to construct the facility within the six year capital
facilities plan; , '
<
Regardless of whether or not a local jurisdiction applies concurrency to public fac'ilities other than
transportation, there is still a need to coordinate new development wifh the provision of capital facilities. ,
This ensures that all relevant public facilities and services are planned and available to senre the demands '�
of new growth. '
INTROD.U_CTIOPI
This chapter provides an overall policy direction for the different capital facil_ity plans and programs provided
by the City: Capital facilities belonging to privately owned utilities (electricity, natural gas lines, etc.) are
covered in the Private Utilities chapter (Volume 4). Certain City plans and programs are further refined in
other sections of this plan such as parks or transportation. 4verall, however, .this chapter acts as a
reference to all of the various capital facility plans, including the City of Auburn Six-Year Capital Facilities
Plan (which is a key component of; and is adopted with, this plan), comprehensive plans; capital
improvement and investrnent programs, inventories, and studies that together represent the planning and
financing mechanisms required to serve the capital facility needs of Aubum. For more detail on a particular
Capital Facility or the City's overall Capital Facility Plan, see the most recent adopted version of the
following: �
ORD.E Page 173 of 751 �
DRAFT CAPITAL FACILiTIES EIEMENT IVOVEMBER 10,2A15
• City of Aubum AiCport Master Plan
o City of Aubum Comprehensive Water Plan
o City ofAuburn Comprehensive Sewer Plan
• City of Aubum Comprehensive Storm Drainage Flan
• City of Auburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan
: City of Aubum Comprehensive Transportation Plan
o Aubum School District Capital Facilities Plan
• Kent School Disfict Gapital Facilities Plan
e Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan
• Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan
VALUES:
Character—Public buildings and spaces incorporate high quality building and landsape design so that
they positively impact the surrounding built environment.
Wellness — Public space5 that are purchased and developed for capital facilities also incorporate
features and infrasiructure that provide more complete non-motorized connections..
Service — Cit�r utilities and buildings ace high in qual_ity and complete, reliable, and available to
residents and business owners.
Economy = City utilities are available or planned to be available to serve allowed commercial,
recreational and residential uses.
Celebration — Capital facility spaces will be available, designed, and programmed in a manner that
promotes public gathering:
Environment — Development of capital facilities will place a premium on environmental preservation
and protection.
Sustainable — Our philosophy to designing, constructing and maintaining utilities and buildings
embraces long term investrnent horizon over concepts that provide short term benefits and outcomes.
PLANNING APPROACH
To manage growth in a manner which enhances, rather than detracts from community quality and values
by actively coordinafing land use type antl intensity with City facility and service development and pro�ision.
Objective 1.1. To ensure that new development does not out-pace the City's ability to provide and
maintain adequate public facilities and services, by allowing new development to occur only when and
where adequate facilities exist or will be provided, and by encouraging development types and locations
which can support the public senrices they require.
Policies:
CF-1 Lands designated for urban growth by this Plan shall have an urban level of public facilities (sewer,
water,storm drainage, and parks)prior to or concurrent with development.
CF-2 Encourage development where new public faeilities can be providetl in an efficient manner.
CF-3 Development shall be allowed only when and where such development can be adequately served
by public services(police and fire)without reducing level of senrice elsewhere.
CF-4 If adequate facilifies are currenUy unavailable and public funds are not committed to provide sueh
facilities, developers must pcovide such facilities at their own expense in order to develop.
OR . - 4of751
Page � 2
L��AF�Ct�PI�"�L FACILITEE.�'i ELEMEi�� E�8t�4l�s"��4�R 10�2C�25
CF-5 The City should continue to assist through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements, to
the extent permittetl by law,where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available,
the City may participate in developer'initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the
extent that the impro.vements benefit the broader publie interest, and are in accord with the speeific
policies and recommendations ofithe appropriate City public facilifies plan.
CF-6 New connections to the Gity's sanitary sewer, water andlor storm drainage systems, shall
contribute their fair share toward the construction antl/or financing of future or on-going projects to
increase the capacity of fhose systems.
CF-7 The City shall encourage and approve development only where atlequate public services including
police protecfiion, fire and emergency medical services, education, parks and other reereational
facilities, solid waste collection; and other governmental services are available or will be made
available at acceptable levels of service prior to project occupancy or use.
CF-8 Extension of any individual facility, irrespective of mode of financing, to serve new development
should be approved only if it is determinetl that adequate fiscal capacity exists:to support the
extension of other needed facilities.
CF-9 Extension of any individual facility, irrespective of mode of financing, to serve new development
should be approvetl only if it is determined that adequate fiscal capacity exists to support cost
effe.ctive service by all on-going public serviees and maintenance of facilities.
Objective 1:2. To ensure that new developments are supported by an adequate level of public services
through an effective system of publicfacilities.
Rolicies
_ _
CF-90 Public facilities shall be provided in accord with the guidance of the Capital Facilities Plan or, as
may be app�opriate a system plan for each type of facility designed to serve at an atlequate level of
service the locations and intensities of uses specified in fhis comprehensive plan.
CF-11 No new tlevelopment shall be permitted unless the facilities speeified in each faeility plan are
available or can be provided at a level adequate to support the development. The adequacy of
facilities shall be determined by the following;
1: An adopted system plan;
2. Policy guidance as provided in fhe City Gapital Fac'ilities Plan; I
3. Appropriate engineering design standards as specified in applicable City Flans, Codes; and
manuals as approved by the City Engineer;
4. Environmental review standards (adequacy includes the absence of an unacceptable adverse
impact on a public facility system), '
5. Case by case evaluation of the impacts of a proposed development on the public facility
systems: first to determine the minimum amount of facili6es necessary to support the
development and second to determihe a proportionate share of the system to be developed or
financially guaranteed before approving the development. i
CF-12 No new development shall be approved which is not supported by a minimum of facilities to
support the development and which does not provide for a proportionate share of relafed sysfem
needs.
CITY UTILITIES
OR : 5 of 751
f' aee � 3
RRAFT CAPIT�IL�ACILITIES ELEMENT NQ1IEM�ER 1fl,2015
_
City Utilities The City of Auburn manages sewer, water and storm drainage utilities as well as solid
_ _
waste collection. The sewer and water utilities serve the City and seve�al areas outside the City limits. As
stated above, the efficientprovision ofithese services can play a significant role in managing the growth of
the City as well as on the quality of life for residents of Aubum and the surrounding areas,
To protect the public health and safety by providing efficient and cost-effective water;sanitary sewer;storm
drai:nage and solid waste services to the community. Ensure that development will only occur if the urban
senrices necessary to support the development will,be ava_ilable atthe time of development.
Water Service
The City provides water service to a total of 13,910 customer accounts as of fhe end of 2013.The City's
sources of water include fhe Coal Creek Springs watershed, West Hill Springs watershed and is
supplemented by a system of ten wells and two connections to the regional water system operated by
Taeoma Public Utilities. Storage faailities are found on the Enumclaw plateau, LaKeland Hills and Lea Hill.
For more background information see the Capital Facilities Plan.or Comprehensive Water Plan.
Objective 1.3 To ensure safe and adequate water service, fbr both domestic and fire profection
pu_rposes;to meet the needs of the existing community and provide for its planned growth.
Policies:
CF-13 The City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Rlan is incorporated as an, element. of this
Comprehensive Rlan. The Comprehensive VUater Plan for the City of Auburn shall reflect the
planned land uses and densities of this Comprehensive Plan.
CF-14 The Comprehensive Water Plan shall provide for the evaluation of existing and potential future
groundwater sources regarding any threats to the quantity and quafity of such sources. The Plan
shall ensure that strategies for the protection of ground water sources used or likely to be used for
public water supplies are established.
_
GF-15 Protection of the City's Goal Creek Springs, and West Hill watersheds; wells, and other sources
shall be a high priority in the designation of appropriate land uses in the vicinity of these.areasand
facilifies.
CF-16 The City shall continue its policy of requiring that water system extensions needed to serve new
development shall be built prior to or simultaneously with such development, according to the size
and configuration identifietl by the Comprehensive Water Plan as necessary to serve future
planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full consideration tq the
_ _ _ _
ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City shall continue to
participate to the eictent permitted by law, through direct participation, LIDs and payback
agreements to assist in the financing of such over sized improvements. Wherever any foRn of City
finance is involved in a water line extension, lines that promote a compact development pattern will
be favored over lines traversing large undeveloped areas where future development plans are
uncertain.
CF-17 INhenever a street is to be substantially reconstructed or a new street built, the Ci#y Engineer shall
determine whether water facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed or brought up to
the size and configuration indicated by the Water Plan and Comprehensive Plan;
CF-18 The City shall continue to recognize the overall system impacts of new deyelopment upon the City
water system through the collection and appropriate use of system development charges or similar
fees.
CF-19 The City shall consider the impacts of new development within aquifer recharge areas of potable
water sources as part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigation
OR . 6of751
Page � 4
DRAFT CA��?�L FACNtII"I�S ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015
measures. Such mitigation may involve hydrogeologic studies, testing, and/or monitoring
(including monitoring wells), spill response planning, spill containment devices, sanitary sewers,
and use of best management practices.
CF-20 The City shall promote waterconservation and the wise use of water resources.
CF-21 The City should work with other water providers to promote effective water supply management
and planning consistent uvith the "South King County Coordinated Water System Plan", as well as
regional water supply and conservation goals.
Sanitary Sewers
The City provides sewer service to a total of 15,398 customer accounts as of June 2015. The system is
primari)y a collection system with treatrnent provided by Metro. The system includes approximately 200
miles of sewers and force mains and 15 sewer pump stations. There are significant areas within the City's
service area which are currentiy on septic systems, although plans for future expansion of sewer service
into these areas is included in fhe Comprehensive Sewer Plan. For more details, see the Capital Facilities
Plan or the Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
Objecfive 1.4 To ensure the efficient transmission of sanitary sewage to the appropriate treatment and
disposal facilities, in order to meet the needs of fhe existing community and provide for its planned growth.
Polisies:
CF-22 The Comprehensiye Sewer Plan is incorporated as an element of this Cornprehensive Plan. The
Comprehensive Sewer Plan for the City of Aubum shall reflect the planned land uses and densities
of this Compcehensive Plan.
CF-23 The City shall continue its policy of requiring fhat sewer system extensions needed to serve new
development shall be built prior to or simultaneously w'ith such development, according to the size
and configuration identified by the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Comprehensive Plan as
necessary to serve future planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall
give full consideration to the ease of operation and maintenanee of these facilities by the City. The
City shall continue to use, to the extent permitted by law, direct participation, LIDs and payback
agreements to assist in the financing of such oversized impro�ements. Wherever any form of City
finance is involved in a sewer line extension, lines that promote a compact development pattern will
be favored over lines traversing large undeveloped areas where future development plans are
uncertain.
CF-24 Whenever a street is to be substantially reconstrueted or a new street buitt, the City Engineer shall
determine whether sewer facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed or brought up to
the size and configuration indicated by the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Comprehensive Plan.
CF-25 The City shall continue to recognize the overall system impacts of new development upon the City
sewer system, through fhe eollection and appropriate use of system development charges or
similar fees.
CF-26 The City shall continue to require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facitities wherever
combined sewers may be disco�ered, antl shall continue to aggressively seek to minimize any
storm water infiltration of the sanitary sewer system.
CF-27 Within those designated urban density areas of the City and within the sanitary sewer utility's
designated service area, sewerage service should be provided by public sewers. The City should
develop mechanisms to accommodate conuersion to public sewers of all septic systems within the
City's service area, particularly when on site systems fail or when public health and water quality is
threatened.
OR . 7of751
Page � 5
L�RAF7 CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEiV1ENT tVQVEMBER 10,2015
Solid Wasfe
-_
The City of Auburn has a contract with Waste Management to handle solid waste collection throughout
most of the Cify of Auburn and Republic in the area of Lea Hili. Both eonfiraets expire on December 31,
2Q17.There are approximately 16,000 Waste Management accounts and 3,800 Republic accounts.
Recycling is handled by INaste Management Residential customers are currently recycling surbside
approximately 47%of its waste stream.
Objective 1.5. To provide area residents and businesses with a universal and compulsory system for
collection and disposal of all solid waste, including ample waste reduction and recycling opportunities
intended to rnaximize diversion of the City's waste stream away from costly landfills, incineration, or other
solid waste disposal facilities; and to conserve exhaustible resources:
Policies:
CF 28 The King County Solid Waste Management Rlan and Solid 1Naste Ir�erlocal Forum, except as
modified by City of Auburn Ordinance 4413 and this Plan shall form the basis for solid waste
management acfivifies wifhin the City.
CF-29 The Cify shall continue to fund solid waste collection, disposal and waste reducfion and recycling
programs and services through the existing solid waste utility, wifh supplemental funding provided
through available grants.
CF-30 The City shall implement solid waste management programs and services which provide ample
opportunities and incentives to maximize the community's participation in local and regional waste
reduction and recycling efforts.
CF-31 The City's solid waste management programs shall be developed to make waste reduction and
recycling efficient, reliable,cost-effective, and convenient for all residents and businesses.
CF-32 The City encourages and should promote the use of products manufactured from recycled
materials, and the use of materials which can be recycled. City Departments and contraetors shall
use recycled and recyclable products whenever and wherever#easible.
CF-33 The City shall implement solid waste reduction and recycling programs which have the cumulative
effect mair�aining the 50 percent waste reduction and recycling goal (recycling tons/total solid
waste.stream).
CF-34 The City shall periodically monitor and evaluate the effectiVeness of Auburn's waste reduction and
recycling programs to ensure that local and state goals and polieies are being met
CF-35 The City shall promote the reeycling of solitl waste materials by providing opportunities for
convenient recycling and by developing educational materials on recycling; composting and other
waste reduction methods.
_ .
Sform Drainage
As of October 2015, the City Storm Drainage System serves over 17,600 customers, exclusively within the
City limits. The System consists of a combination of open ditches, closed conveyance pipes, water quality
fac'ilities, and pump station5. For more defails, see the Capital Facilities Plan or the Comprehensive Storm
Drainage Plan.
Objective 1.6. To ensure that collection, conveyance, storage and discharge of storm drainage is
provided irr a suffcient and environmentally responsible manner, in order to meet the needs of the existing
community and provide for its planned growth.
Folicies:
OR . 8 of 751
Page � 6
VT1N3—d L.HJ'I$.H�Z—.NL.IL.II7G3LL�lY1L3Y1 1VVXkeIY@V���ilt�V1.7
CF-36 The City of Auburn Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan is ineorporated as an element of this
Comprehensive Plan.
CF-37 The City shall require developers to construct storm drainage improvements directly serving the
development, including any necessary off-site improvements.
CF-38 The City shall require that off-site storm drainage improvements needed to serve new development
shall be built prior to or simultaneously with such development, according to the size and
configuration identified by the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan as necessary to serve fufure
planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full eonsiderafion to the
ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City should continue fo use
direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements to assist in the financing of off-site
impro�ements required to serve the tlevelopment.
GF-39 The City shall recognize the overall system impacts of new development upon the City's drainage
system, through the collection of system development charges or similar fees to assist in the
financing of new and oversized (e.g. regional drainage improvements.)
CF-40 The City should eontinue to fund and provide storm tlrainage services through the existing storm
drairiage ufility. The Cify's storm drainage utility should be responsible for implementation,
maintenance and operation of the City"s storm drainage system and to seek out sources of storm
water pollution and correct them.
CF-41 Appropriate rates and system development charges shall be assessed to fund fhe on-going
maintenance; operation, and capital expenditures of the utility, in accordance with the
Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. Periodic cosf of service stutlies shall be sompleted to
reassess fhe monthly service and system development charges.
CF-42 D�ainage facilities serving the larger community should be owned, operatetl and maintainetl by the
City's storm drainage utility. Drainage facilities serving intlividual properties are discouragetl;
however'if essential, as determined by the City Eng'ineer; they should be owned; operated and
maintained by the property owner in aceordance with a recorded maintenance agreement
approved by the City. The maintenance agreement shall include provisions that will preserve the
City's ability to ensure the long term use of the drainage facility, and may'include the granting of an
easement over the facilityto the Gity. Maintenance intensive drainage facilities designed to serve
as a multifunctional private resource (e.g., private parks, we�and mitigation� should not be ownetl,
operated or maintained by the utility. The utility shall ensure that all private and publie storm
drainage improvements are designed, constructed, operated and maintainetl in acsortlance with
the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan and Comprehensive Plan.
�Y 9 9
GF=43 The Ci shall encoura e the use of re ional-scale water quality and quantity control facilities as a
means of controlling drainage and flood waters.
CF-44 W.herever possible, regional detention facilities shoultl be utilized as a multi-functional community
resource. When selecting a site and d.esigning a regional storm;drainage facility, the City should
_: -
corisider other public benefits such as recreational, habitat, cultural; educational, open space and
aesthetic opportunities..
CF-45 The City shall promote policies which seek to maintain the existing conveyance capacity of natural
drainage courses.
CF-46 Whenever a street is to be.substantially reconsf�ucted or a new street built; the City.Engineer shall
determine whether drainage facilities in that street right of.way shall be constructed to adequately
serviee the street and whefher they should be brought up to the size and.configura�on indicated by
the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. If the inelusion of water quality and quantity control
,
OR . _ ____ - 9 of 751
� a � �. � �
[3RA�T CAPI7AL FACBLITIES E�EMEiVT IVt)VEMB6R 10,2t�15
facilities is not feasible, as determined bythe City Engineer, when street reconstruction occurs, off.-
site mitigation may be considered regionally as proposed within the Comprehensive Storm
Drainage Plan to meet the City's storm drainage requirements as determined by fhe City Engineer..
_ -- _ _
CF-47 The City shall require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined
sewers may be discovered.
_ _
CF-48 In selecting the preferred Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan sub-basin alternative for
implementafion by the City's storm drainage utility,fhe City shall consider the following factors:.
1. The most efficient and cost effective means of serving a subbasin or combination of subbasins.
2. The ability of fhe alternative to implement source eontrol 6est management,practices and to
avoid or mitigafe environmental impacfs, sueh as impasts to existing wetlands, and the degree
to which the alternative promotes water quality treatment, and protects aquatic and riparian
habitat
3. Consistency with Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan policies and recommendations and
compatibility with stormwater improvement policies and recommendations presented in other
regional stormwater plans;
4. Restrictions or constraints associatetl with rece'iving waters,.
5. The ability to develop a multi-use facility:
6. The degree to which the alternative preserves, increases, and is compafible with existing open
space.
7. Consistency with exisfing and future planned development.
8. The advantages and disadvantages of storage versus conveyance while ensuring adequate
treatment for water.quality treatment.
9. The degree to which the alternative presenres and enhances existing native vegetation and
existing drainage courses.
10. The alternatives ability to reduce flood hazard impacts resulting from the 25-year design storm
event
CF-49 The City's Storm Drainage Utility shall strive to meet the environmental protestion goals of fhe
Comprehensive Plan through compliance with and implementation of the policies contained herein.
Environmental issues such as water quality and fish habitat protection shall be considered in all
new development applications and new storrn drainage improqements:
CF-50 The Storm Drainage Utility shall work wit� other jurisdictions and agencies to address regional
water quality issues.
CF-51 The City shall seek opportunities where feasible to reintroduce treated urban runoff bask into
groundwater system as new and redevelopment occurs to minimize urbaniiation impacts to the
hydrology of the natu�al rive�`systems.
_ _
CF-52 The Gity shall evaluate the feasibilify and opportunity to improVe the water quality of its existing.
. _
discharges to the.river systems to enhance water quality in response to the Endangered Species
Act.
CF-53 The City shall seek to minimize the impacts to the natural river system's hydrology by encouraging
pre-treatment of surface flows of new tlevelopment and re-introducfion ir�o the groundwater where
feasible. �
OR _: _ -_ __ _ __. _ - _ O of 751
Page � 8
DRAFT CAPITAL FAClLITIES ELEIVIENT Nt�VEMBER 1Q,2C71S
Gommunicafions and Dafa Infrastrucfure
Objective 1.7 To enhance the City's communications and data infrastructure through installation of City-
owned conduit throughout the city.
Polieies:
CF=54 To allow for expansion of the City's conduit system with minimal disruption to streets and at a lower
cost to the public, the City shall require the placement of conduits as part of arterial street (as.,,
defined in the City of Aubum Transportation Plan) improveme,nt projects whether private or public
development projects.
CF-55 The City shall explore new technologies that may present additional opportunities for the City to
use its communications and data infrastructure to enhance its provisions of public senrices.
CF-56 To increase sy"stem-wide coordi'nated management of facilifies, the City shall work towards
increasing the number of remofe monitoring facilities for utility facilities, traffic control devices, and
other equipment located throughout the city. -
CF=57 Whenever possible, make remote data aecess available to the City's potice officers, inspectors,
utility staff, and otherfield personnel.
PUBLIC.BUILDINGS �
To maximize public access and provide for the appropriate location and development of public and I
institutional facilities that serve the cultural, educational, recreational, religious and public service needs of
the community and the region. ;
Qbjecfive 1.8. To site publis and institutional buildings in accord with their service function and the needs
of the members of the public served by the facility. !
Policies:
CF-58 Downtown shall continue to be the business center of City govemment and the City shall seek to
site all of its business functions in the downtown area.
CF-59 All "people"oriented" City facilities should be located in high amenity sites, Les Grove Park and
Downtown are particula�ly appropriate sites for senrices such as senior seNices, community ',
center,library, museums, etc.
CF-6U City parK builtlings should be developed in accord with fhe Parks and Recreafion Element.
CF-61 The siting, tlesign construction and irnprovement of all public buildings and spaees shall be done in
full compliance with the Americans wifh Disabilities Act(ADA).
CF-62 Public and institutional facilities which attract a large number of yisitors (City Hall, museums,
libraries, educational, permit or license offices, and health or similar facilities, etc.)should be sited
in areas which are accessible(within 1/4 mile)by transit.
CF-63 The City shall encourage other agencies to follow these siting principles in considering new sites
forpublic buildings.
CF-64. The location of religious institutions, private schools, community centers, parks antl similar public
or institutional facilities shall be related to the size of the facility and the area served. City-wide
facilities should be sited in visible and accessible locations. �
_. _ _
CF-65 Small public or institutional facilities intended to serve one ortwo residential neighborhoods may be
located within a neighbofiood. Larger public or institutional facilities intended to serve mainly
Aubum residents or businesses shall be located along major arterial roads within the Community
OR . 1 of 751
Page � 9
DRAF7 CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT fVqVEMBER 10,2015
Serving Area of Auburn, however, elementary schools should be given flexib'ility to locate along
smaller roads. Buffering from adjacent land uses may be required.
CF-66 The location of utility facilities is often dependent upon the physical requirements of the utility
system. Sewage lift stations, pump stations, water reservoirs, and ofher similar facilities should be
sited, designed, and buffered (through extensive screening andlor landscaping) to fit in with their
surroundings harmoniously. When sited within or adjacent to residential areas, special attention
should be given to minirnizing noise, light and glare impacts.
CF-67 Public facilities of an industrial or heavy commercial character should be confined to the Region
Serving Area of Auburn, unless no other reasonable siting opportunity exists in which case siting
still must comply with applicable zoning standards. Examples of such fac'ilities are the Gity
mainfenance and operations facility, state and regional solid waste facilities, and the Aubum
School District bus bam.
CF-68 The siting and relocation of City maintenance and operation facilities shall be responsive to
growing demands for utility,transportation and fleet senrices and shall also take into account the
City's role in emergency preparedness and response.
Essential Public Facilities: According to the GMA(RCW 36.70A.200), �Essential public facilities include
those facilities that are typically difficult to site such as airports,state education facilities, state or regional
transportationfacilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste
handling facilities,and in-patier�facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group
homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020." More generally; essential
public facilities are fac'ilities, conveyances, or sites that meet the following definition: (1)fhe facility,
conveyance or site is used to provide services to the public; (2)these seiviceS a�e delivered by government
agencies, private or non-profit organizations under contract fo or with substantial funding from government
agencies,or private firms or organizations subject to public senrice obligations, and (3)the facility or use of
the site is necessary to adequately provide a public service.
The Growth Management Act requires that every comprehensive plan include a process for siting essential
public facilities. No comprehensive plan can preclude the siting of essential public facilities within the
community. The Growth Managemer�Act includes these provisions because siting certain public facilities
has become difficult due to the impacts many of these facilities have on the adjacent community. Many
factors confribute to this problem, including increased demand for facilities to serve a growing population,
increased competition for land as the state becomes more urbanized, problems with siting processes, and
judicial decisions which compel jurisdictions to provide certain facilities. By including a process for siting
essenfial facilities in the Comprehensive Plan, deficiencies in the siting process can be minimized.
This seetion contains Auburn's process for siting esse�rtial publie facilities. This is an interim process until
development regulations are incorporated into city code. When that proeess is developed, Aubum may
modify these procedures to reflect the Gouncil's recommendation.
CF-69 Essential Public Facility Siting Process.
General:
1. The City will review proposals through the process ou�ined in parts (3) through (8) below, if the
_ _
essential public facilifjr largely serves a regional, countywide, statewide or national need and is
included in a policy sense within an adopted state or regional plan which meets the following
criteria:
a. The state or regional pian was developed through an appropriate public process (including at
least one local public hearing)and has undergone a NEPA and/or SEPA review; and;
OR . 2of751
Page � 10
L3F�AFT CAPC�AL FACILITIES ELEN�E�)� t�3t)VE�#3ER 1{�,2(315
b. A clear policy statement supporting the type of facility proposed must be included. The plan
should also include, in a p.olicy sense, a set of sifing guidelines used for such a facility. Such
criteria may include, but not be limited to, type and su.fficiency of transporfation access, eo-
location requirements, preferred adjacent Jand uses, on-or off-site security and/or mitigation,
and required public facilities and services.
2. If the essential public facility lacgely serves a regional, countywide, statewide or national need and
is nof part of an adopted state or regional plan, the proponent w►ill be required to request that the
appropriate state or regional plan be amended to include the proposal meeting the criteria
contained in part (1) above. The proposal will also be reviewed following fhe process outlined in
parts(3)fhrough (8).
Essenfial Public Facilifies of a regional, countywide, statewide,or national nature:
3. Essential public facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide or nafional nature will be reviewed 6y
the City through the special area plan process. The boundaries of the Special Area Plan will be set
_ � _
at a scale directly related to the size and magnitude of the proposal. For fac'ilities of regional, state,
:
and national need, an altemafive analysis wrill be performed using, but not limited to, the guidelines
described in part 1 (above). Auburn staff shall participate in the review process of part 1 (above),
antl use the data, analysis and environmental documents prepared in that process to aid in the
C'ity's special area plan review, if Auburn determines that those documents are adequate. If the
facility requires other development permits, those approuals also shall be considered within the
review process:
4. Impacts of the proposed essential public facility must be identifed and an appropriate mitigation
_ _ _
plan developed. Unless ofheNvise governed by State faw, the financing strategy for the mitigation
plan shall be strucfured so that the eoSts of fhe plan shall be allocated proportionally on a benefit
basis using; buf not limited to, non-local sources of funding.
5. The special area plan process to be used for essential pu6lic facilities of a regional, countywide,
sfatewide or national nature shall follow the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment process which
includes multiple opportunities for'public involvement.
6. An analysis of the facility's impact on City finances shall be undeitaken. If fhe study shows that
locating a facility'in a community would result in a disproportionate financial purden on the City of
.
Aubum, an agreement with the projecYs proponents must be executed to mitigate the adverse
_
financial impact or the approval shall be denied.
Essential Public Facilities of primarily local nafure:
7. If the essential public facility meets largely local needs (for example, in-patient facilities, including
substance abuse facilities, mental health faeilities and group homes), the facility shall be
considered based upon section(8) below.
All Essential Public Facilities:
8. The following criteria shall be used to evaluate all applications to site essential public facilities:
a. Whether there is a public need for the facility.
b. The impact of the facility on the surrounding uses and environment,the City and the region.
c. Whefher the design of fhe facility or the operation of the facility can be eonditioned, or the.
'impacts mitigated, in a similar manne� as with a t�aditional private development, to make the
facility compatible with fhe affected area and the environment.
O R : - 3 of 751
_ Pa � e � ii
I�RAFT CAP6�AL FAC1LITiES ELEIVIIENT NpVEMBER 10,2�15
d. Whether a package of mitigating measures can be developed that would make siting the
facility within the community more acceptable.
e. Whether the factors that make the facility diffieult to site can be modified to increase the range
of available sites or to mioimize impacts on affested areas and the environment.
f. Whether the proposed essential publie facility is consisfent with the Auburn Comprehensive
Plan.
_
g. Essential public facilities shall comply with any applicable state siting and permitting
requirements(e.g., hazardous waste facilities).
h_. VUhefher the State proves by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that 1.) a sufficient and
reasonable number of alternative sites have been fully,fairly, and competently considered; and
2) such sites were found to be unsuitable for an SGTF for reasons other than the cost of
property.
i. Whether careful analysis has been completed to show that siting of the facility will have no
undue impact on any one.racial, cultural, or socio-economic group, and that there will not be a
resulting concentration of similar facilities in a particular neighborhood, community,jurisdiction
or region.
CF-70 The Director shall m_ake a determination as to whether a development application will result in a
significant change of use or a significant change in the intens_ity of use of an existing essential
public facility. If the Planning Director determines that the proposed changes are significant, the
proposal will be subject to the essential public facility siting proce.ss as defined in Policy CF-69; If
the Flanning Director determines that the proposed changes are insignificant; the application shall
- - -
be reviewed t��ough the City's standard development review procedures. The Planning Director's
determination shall be based upon the following:
1. The proposal's impacts on the surrounding area
2: The likelihood that there will be future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or
connected wrifh the proposal.
One of the difficulties of siting essential public facilities is that they are not allowed in all appropriate areas.:
To help address this problem, Auburn shall allow essential public facilities in those zones in wliich they
_
woultl be compatible, Tfie type5 of facilities that are compatible will vary with the impacts likely from the
facility and the zoning district. In the M-2 Zon'ing District, many essential public fac'ilities will be compatible
uses and b�oad use categories allowing such uses should be incfuded in fhe zone.
CF-71 Essential publie facilities shall be allowed in those zoning districfs in which fhey would be
compatible and impae� can be mitigated. In situations where specific development standards
cannot be met, but there is a determination that the facility can be made compatihle, the City
Council can waive those specific standards with the requirement.that appropriate mitigation is
provided. The M-2 Zoning District should include broad use categories that allow all essential
publie facilities that are difficult to site as permitted or conditional uses as appropriate.
CF-72 Essential public fasilities should be equitably located throughout the City, county and state. No
ju�isdietion should absorb a disproportionate share.
CF-73 Essential public facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide or national natu�e should be
resfricted to the Region Serving Area of Aubum. Such facilities should be locafed in relationship to
__
tranSportation facilities in a manner appropriate to their transportation needs. Extensive buffering
from adjasent uses may be required. Facilities which generate a significant amount of fruck traffic
should be locafed on major arteeial streets.
OR : 4 of 751
_ Page � 12
� Exhi�it �
A►U�U FtIV COI�/I PR�I��IV S1�1E P�IV m t40�1J Illl E 4
Private lJtilities Eler�ent
PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT VISION
Privafe Ufili6es in Aubum are planned, designed,and constructed in a manner fhaf adequafely supports future
growth scenarias fhat are predicted in the City's Land Use Elemenf and fhaf ineef ftie needs of res�denfs, visitors
and businesses. Sustainability is a principal fhat guides decisions for where ufilities are placed, how they are
consfrucfed, how fhey are operafed and mafnfained, and how all aspecfs of design, consfrucfion and operafion
are funded.
PRIVATE UTtLITIES CONDITIONS
Electricity and Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy(RSE) provides slecfical and natural gas senrice to the
City of Auburn and its potential annexation area. PSE is an investor-owned private utility which provides
service to appcoximately 1,2 million customers in a service area that covers 6,000 square miles,
With respect to electrical service, PSE builds, opecates and maintains an electrical system consisting of
generation, transmission and distribution facilities: Facility technology for elecficity transmission may
change in the future in response to the need to create more efficient fiacilities and in [esponse to various
electromagnetic feld and health concems and diversificafion'of resources. Utility policies should be
updated in the future tg take into consideration changes in technology,facilities, and services.
Natural Gas: The Northwest Pipeline Corporation and Enumclaw Natural Gas also have gas lines in the
southeastern portion of the City. Northwest Pipeline Corporation's only customer in Auburn is Enumclaw
Natural Gas. Enumclaw Naturaf Gas serves Auburn residential customers in the area of the Adventist
Academy;
Telecommunications: Telecommunications include a wide range of senrices including conventional
telephone,cellular telephone and cabletelevision. Technology in:the field oftelecommunications continues
to change rapitlly. ��� � � � � � ��
Convenfional�Telephone�- � � � � i
Conventional; local telephone:service to t�e City is provided by Century Link. Century Link is a global
provider of telecommunications services:
The facilities in whieh calls are switched are called central offices. Tqpically there are four main lines
heading out from each central office-one in each direction. Auburn's central office is located in downtown
Aubum.
Long distance service is p�ovided in fhe area by several providers: These providers have underground
fiber optic cables passing through the City of Auburn.
Cellular Telephone '
Cellular telecommunications provide mobils telephone communications via radios that send and receive
signals from a network of receivers mounted on utility poles,towers, buildings or other sfrucfures on private
property or within the right of way. Cellular communication companies offer digital voice, messaging and
high speed wireless tlata services to customers.
Cellular telephone service within the City and its potential annexation areas is provided by multiple private
companies providing service throughout the Puget Sound region.: Regulation of cellular providers is
ORD.E Page 185 of 751 II
DRAFT P621V,43�E UTILITIE5 ELEMENT NQVEMBER 1Q,2015
provided by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC}: Technology and business practices in the
area oftelecommunicafions continues to change rapidly.
Cable Television
Cable television service'is provided by Comcast through a combination of aerial and underground cables.
The location of existing and planned cable lines are shown on Map 6.4.
INTRODUCTION
The Growth Management Act requires the City of Auburn to include a utilities element within its
Cornprehensive Plan. The element should provide a framework for the effieient and predictable provision
and siting of uti(ity facilities and services within the City consistent with the serving utilities public service
obligations. This element covers private utilities, (those not provided by the City of Auburn) and includes
electricity, telesommunications, and natural gas. City owned water; sewer, and stormwater ufilities are
described within the Capital Facilities Element(Chapter 5)of this comprehensive plan.
Investor owned utilities in the State of Washington, are 'regulated 6y the Washington Utilities and
Transportation Commission (WUTC). State law regulates the rates, charges, senrices facilities and
practices of utilities. Any changes in policies regarding these aspects of ufil:�ty.provision require UWTC
approval.
The primary responsibility for planning for private utilities rests wit� the utility providers.�Clearly, however,
this planning can not take place without open lines of cammunication beiween the City and the utility
providers. The City acknowledges that some priyate utility pro�iders are not willing to provide capac'�ty or
future construction plans as some of this'ir�ormation may effect their competitiveness or be considered to
be proprietary. The utilities, however,must recognize that this may hinder the City's abil'ity to assist them in
their projects. - __ ���, � �
Values:
�` .
Character-Private utilities will provide a positive contribution to the quality, aesthetics and funetionality
of the community,
, ,
Wellness = Utility `infrastructure and systems suppo�t the delivery of safe and efficient electircity, gas,
antl tefecommunications �-�, � �
Senrice = Utility infrastructure and systems support the City's goals of providing accessible and
transparent g�vemment services and processes.
Economy - Businesses are seNed by utility inftastructure that meets or exceeds the needs for entry
into the market aritl f�ture grouvth.�
Celebration - Telecommunication systems are fully utilized to reach a broader eross section of fhe
community in a way thaf-brings people together for civic activities, cultural events, and soaial
awareness.
Environment- Siting! installation and maintenance of utilities will ensure protection, preservation and
respect of the wildlife habitat,water quality,�and environmentally sensitive features.
Sustainable- UVhen designing, constructing and maintaining utilities the long term investment horizon
is favored over concepts fhat provide short term benefits and outcomes.
General Policies
Objective 1.1 To allow the development of private utilifies to meet the needs of the existing commun_ity
and provide forits planned growth consistent with the serving utilities public senrice obligations.
OR . 6of751
Page �2
DRAFT PRIVR3E C}�'ILITiES�LE�i£�3T N�'ttE�J1�3�Ft 1Q,2415
Policies:
PU-1 Private utility companies are resognized as providers of impoitanf services necessary to maintain
current and future lifestyles.
PU-2 Private utility providers should referto the City!s Comprehensive Plan Map for guidance �egartling
future land uses and intensities. Private utility facilities and systems should be consistent with the
uses and densities allowed by the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The Cify will regularly
provide this information and information on pending development proposals (both public and
private) to the appropriate provider. In return, the City expects there to be a cooperative posfure
towards coordinated and sensitive expansion of the infrastructure.
PU-3 Private utility companies should strive to provide utility senrices to all segments of the Aubum
population and areas of the community.
Objective 1.2 To improve the safety, visual quality, and efficiency�of private ufility facilities consistent with
��.
the serving utilities public service.
Polieies:
PU-4 The City shall require that new private utiCity distribution, service and telecommunication Iines be
located underground wifhin all new developments. The City will also work with the utility
companies to relocafe existing distribution, service and telecommunication lines untlerground as a
part of new development, whene�er it is technologically feasible and as part of City capital roadway
projects whenever it is economrcally and technologically, feasible. Expansions and apgrades
completed by private utilities wilf 'be required to be untlerground unless they meet appropriate
ezemptions. - �
� �
PU-5 Common utility trenches`�shoultl be encouraged and coordinated by both pri�ate and public
provider"s�i�heri�ever�poss'ibl'e. � ��
PU-6 To reduce visual clutter, antennas, relay mec,hanisms and similar structures should be located on
existing poles, structures, or buildings whenever-�possible. 1Nhen deemed feasible and necessary �
,;
to minimize impacts on atl�acent uses or views by,the City, visual screening may be requi�ed.
PU-7 The Cify shall consider the en,v,ironmenfal impacts of proposed utility facilities as a part of its
enviconmental review process. =:�When requestetl by the City, the utility provider shall furnish
docuinentation of current resea�ch results and/or provide additional information related to
determining the environmental impacts, if any, of the proposetl facilities.
�y ,
PU-8 The construction of facilities and proyision of services by private utility providers within the City of
Auburn shall 6e.in complianc�with all of the goals and policies of this comprehensive plan.
PU-9 Decisions regarding pri�afe�utility facilitie5 within Au6urn should consider the safe, adequate antl
effcienf availability of these ufilities to otherjurisdictions.
PU-10 The location of utility facilities is often dependent upon the physical requirements of the utility
system. All utility fasilities should be sited, designed, and buffered (fhrough extensive screening
and/or landscaping)to fit in with their surroundings harmoniously and safely. When sited within or
atljaeent to residential areas, special attention should be given to minimizing noise, light and glare
impacts.
OR : 7 of 751
Page � 3
�`a �xhibit 7
cr�v t�w � ��_
. � W'ASFiING'Tt�N
�
� � �� � � � '��
■
ran � o a - ion - ar�
�4dopted by Ordinance No. XXXX
December X, 20I5
ORD.E Page 188 of 751
� ?
CCI'YOF --- _,�.-��'".�j�"
, �,,� � : �:� �'
WASF(fNGTC}N
Tab(e of Contents
Paae
Chapter 1 Introduction 1 - 1
1..1 Purpose 1 - 1
1.2 How the City Uses the Plan 1 -:2.
1.3 Re,gional Coordination 1 - 4
1.4 Accomplishments 5ince the Last Plan 1 - 7
1.5 Plan Organization 1 - 9
1.6 Staff Resources 1 - 10
Chapter 2 The Street System 2 - i
2.:1 Existing Street System 2 - 1
2.2 Street Standards and Levels-of-Service 2 = 8
2.3 Future Street System 2 - 13
Chapter 3 Non-N9otorized Transportation 3 - 1
3.1 Pedestrian Travel 3 - 1
_ _ _
3.2 Bicycl.e Travel 3 - 9
3.3 Equestrian Travel 3 - 12
3.4 FutL�e Non=Motorized System 3 - 14
Chapter 4 Transit 4 - 1
4.1 Needs Assessment 4 = 1
4.2 Transit User Needs 4 - 5
4.3 Transit System Recommendations 4 - 10
Chapter 5 Policies 5 - 1
5.1 Coordi,nation, Planning and Implementation 5 - 2
5.2 Street System 5 - 14
5.3 Non-Motorized System S - 22
5.:4 Transit System 5 - 27
5.5 Air T�ansportafion 5 - 28
Chapter 6 Funding 6 - i
6.1 Finaneial Planning and Programming 6 - 1
6.2 Funding Soarces 6 - 2
6.3 Funding Strategies and Project Prioritization 6 - 6
Chapter 7 Monitoring and Evaluation T- 1
7.1 Annual Upclates 7 - 1
7.2 Multi-Year Updates 7 - 2
List of Maps and Figures
Paae
M.a.p 1-1 Adjacent Jurisdictions 1 - 6
Figure 1-1 Transportation Program Staff Resources 1 - 10
Map 2-1 Functional Roadway Classifications *
ORD.E Page 189 of 751
� . °
crrv or .: -�='"'
. , �_*
� ���
��"` - � WA5}-iINGTON
Map 2-2 Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2013) *
Map 2-3 Truck Route Map *
Map 2-4 Freight Route Classification Map
Map 2-5 Auburn LOS Corridors *
Figure 2-1 Population, Housing and ]ob Growth (2000 - 2035) 2 - 13
Map 2-6 Transportation Improvement Projects *
Map 2-7 Intelligent`Transportat'iqn Systems *
Ma.p 3-1 Existing Sidewalks and FutUre Priorify Sidewalk Corridors *
Map 3-2 Existing and Future Bicycle Facilities and Multi-Use Trails *
Map 3-3 Bieyc.le Corridors a.nd Conneetors *
Map 4-1 Au.burn Transit Routes and MIT Shuttle Route *
Map 4-2 Auburn Transit Route.s and Transit Dependent Areas *
*Map located following the chapter corresponding to the Map number.
List of Tables
Paae
Table 1-1 Transportation Improvements Completed Since 20A9 1 - 8
Table 2-1 Existing (2014) Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 10
Table 2-2 2022 Capacity Projects 2 - 14
Table 2-3 2022 Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 19 '
Table 2-4 2035 Capacity Projects 2 - 21 I
Table 2-5 Z035 Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 25
Table 3-1 Existing Equestrian Facilities 3 - 13
Table 3-2 Futu�e T�ail Projects 3 = .14
ORD.E Page 190 of 751
��,'
�,TYt��- --��.� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�. ��� .
��' ��` wns H r Nc��ra�v
_ � ..: .__ _ ___._... _:..
f ��� ��` �. ,�� ���
�;� �:
, ,,:
x
>
, .
�i'
.�:��.
CHAPTER 1. � � ������, �� `
�
�`" _�� �. �� �
".+ , ir,�� -
x� ,� � � ,��,'�. �c��.
. . ��.� . , ".. �' ;: �a
� �:���
T'he transportation system is a vital component ��f � , „ .�
of Auburn s social, e¢onomic, and h sical ����° ` ' " �'� _���
P Y � � ��� ��
structure. The primary purpose of the � � ,"fi��� ..� �''
transportation system is to support the Auburn Station` u
movement of people and goods within the City
and eonnect the City to the broader region. Secondarily, it influences patterns of growth,
development and economic aetivity by prqviding access to adjacent land uses. Planning for the
development and mairitenance of the transportation system is a critical activity promoting the
efficient movement of people and goods, ensuring emergency access, and optimizing the role
transportation plays in attaining other community objectives.
1.1 P P S
The Comprehensive Transportarion Plan is the framework for transportation planning in Auburn,
It funcrions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system.The Plan evaluates
the exisring system by idenrifying key assets and improvement needs. These findings are then
incorporated into a needs assessment,which guides the future of the transportarion system.
This Plan is mulri=mod,al, addressing multiple forms of transportation in Auburn ineluding the
street network, non-motorized travel, and transit. Evaluating all modes enables the Ciry to address
its future transportarion needs in a comprehensive and balanced manner.
VISION
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan reflects the current and future needs of the Auburn
community and,in doing so, seeks to:
� Enhance the qualiry of life for all Auburn residents;
■ Encourage healthy community principles through non-motorized travel;
� Promote a transportation system tliat supports local businesses and enhances economic
development opportunities;
� Create a transportation system that is efficient,uncomplicated, and welcoming to visitors;and
� Provide a balanced,mulri-modal transportation system that addresses both local and regional
needs.
Clia�ter 1.Introduction P�;e 1-1
ORD.E Page 191 of 751
�� --
�����r 3 % Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� � �
�+IAS E11 N ca't'C7 iV
C'7 Ae REQUIRE�ENT.S
Washington State's 1990 Growth Management Act(GMA) requires that transportation planning
be directly tied to the Ciry's land use decisions and fiscal planning. T'his is traditionally
accomplished throizgh the adoption of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Auburn fulfills this mandate by adopting the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as the
Transp.ortation Element of the Ciry's Comprehensive Plan. In order to be GMA compliant, the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan must:
■ Inventory the existing transportarion system in order to identiify e�sting capital faciliries and
travel levels as a bas.is for future planning;
■ Identify level-of-service (LOS) standards for all arteri'als, transit routes, and state-owned
facilities as a gauge for evaluating system performance;
� Specify actioris'and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation
facilities or services that are below an established level-of service standard;
� Deterrnine e�sting deficiencies of the system;
■ Use land use assumpuons to estimate future travel,including impacts to state-owned facilities;
� Identify future improveinent needs from at least ten years of tra.ffic forecasts based on the
adopted land use plan;
� Include a multiyear financing plan based on the idenEified needs;
� Address intergovernmental coordination;and
o Include transportation dem.and managerr►erit strategies,
im� H� th� 1City ��� �1�� ��r�
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan provides policy and technical direction fbr development
of the City's transportation system through the year 2035. It updates and expands the 2009
Co�rehen.rive Tran:rportation Plan by recqgniz,ing network changes since the last plan, evaluating
current needs, and identifying standards for future development arid various infrastructure
improvement scenarios. The Plan underwent a major update in 2005 and a midterm update in
2009 to incorporate the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas into the Plan,
NE��S tASSESSMENT `
A system-wide, rnulu-modal needs asse.ssment was conducted throughout plan development to
ascertain which aspects of Aubum's existing transportation system work well and which ones
need improvement. An evaluation of potential solutions and investment priorities was also.
conducted as part of this proeess. The end result is that Auburn has a more thorough
understanding of system deficiencies; liow best to address these deficieneies, and direetion for
expanding the system in a susxainalile rrianner.
PUBLIC I(�VtJLVEMENT
Public outreach is.an important component of the ongoing needs assessment process. During
2014 the Ciry held a number of communiry meetings through the Imagine Auburn visioning
Chupter 1.l��trodaretion Pu�e 1-2
ORp.E Page 192 of 751
��i7��� ����� �� ��� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
������
`,� .,�� wASHIIvGT�c�N
process. The meerings included discussions of capital investments in transportation infrastructune
and other transporta�on rel.a.ted issues which have been incorporated into this.document.
As part of the adoption process, the Plari is also reviewed by the Ciry of Auburn Planning
Commission, including a hearing where members of the public are provided the opportuniry to
provide input on the plan,and is then reviewed and adopted by the Ciry Council.
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
The Ciry creates policies to state preferences for preservation of .the existing system and
development.of the future transportarion system. Policies can be qualitarive in nature, but often
they are quantitative and prescribe a specific standard.
Policies are also important for commuriicating the Ciry's values and needs to neighboring
jurisdictions and regional and state agencies. Having established policies iri place enables tlie Ciry
to more effecrively influence change in keeping.with its needs and objecrives.
�OS A�lD CONCURRENCY
The concurrericy provisions of the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) recjuire t�iat local
governments permit development only if adequate public facilities e�ust, or can be guaranteed to
be available within si�c years, to support new development.
T'he GMA requires each local jurisdicrion to identify facility and service needs based on level-of-
service (LOS) standards. Auburn ensures that future development will not cause the system's
perforrnance to. fall below the adopted LOS sta:ndard by doing one or a combination of the
following: limiting development, requiring appropriate mitigarion, or changing the adopted
staridard.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PL�4iV A�JD TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PRt?GRAM
The Ciry uses the Transportation Improyement Program (I`IP) and Capital Faciliries Plan (CFP)
to develop a financial plan for capital improvements in Auburn, thus enabling the Ciry to fulfill
the GMA requirement of having a muluyear financing plan based on the idenrified transportation
needs.
TYte TIP, is a financial planning tool used to implement the list of transportation improvemerit
projects idenrified in the Transportation Plan. It is a six-year plan which is reviewed and updated
annually by the Ciry Council to reflect changes to pro'Ject priorities and funding circumstances.
The first three years of the plan are fiscally constrained. Traffic unpact fees on riew developme.nt
are deternuned by the cost of the capacityprojects included in the TIP.
The Capital Facilities Plan is also an annually adopted six-year financing plan. However, it is
fiscally constrained for all six years. Unlike the TIP, the CFP is an ado,pted element of the Ciry's
Comprehensive Plan.
Chapter 1.Introcluctzon P�r;e 1-3
ORD.E Page 193 of751
�,.
�:s����F :� �� �=� , . Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��,T��J�;�T
-•� WASHI�vC�TON
1.� R �IONAL COOR I �TI�
In addition to being influenced by factors within the City, Auburn's transportation system is
influenced by what happens beyond its City limits: growth in .neighboring communities;
infrastructure maintenance by regional agencies, the lack of funding for road maintenance, new
capacity projects, and competing demands for transit servi.ces; This Plan calls for effecrive
interjurisdictional actions to address cross-border issues and to mirigate the impact of new
development. The Plan also recognizes that other jurisdictions, parricularly state agencies and
transit providers, are responsible for a maJ'or share of the transportation faciliues serving Auburn.
VVASHINGTON ST/�TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDO'1� has jurisdiction over three major
routes connecting Aubum to the region: SR-167, SR-18, and SR-164 (Auburn Way South)..
Auburn coordinates with WSDOT to study these corridors and implement roadway
improvements. WSDOT also serves an important role as administrator of federal and state
transportation funds..
S011ND TRANSIT
Sound Transit provides a variety of regional transit services for King, Snohomish, and Pierce
counties. In Auburn, Sound Transit provides commuter rail and express bus service. Auburn
Statiori also serves as a hub and transfer station for local transit service provided by King Counry
Metro Transit and Pierce Transit:
The transit chapter provides more detail on current Sound Transit services; remaining needs for
regional transit service,and the role Auburn plays in coordinating with the agency.
KING COUNTY
King Counry Metro Transit, a division of the King Counry Department of Transportation,
provides local bus service for the Auburn area. Planned service for the Ciry of Auburn is
described in the Metro Strategie Plan for Public Transportation 2011-2021 and in Metro's Long
Range Public Transportation Plan now under development and expected to be completed in 2016.
The City has developed an employee Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program in coopera.tion
with Metro Transit. Details of the CTR program are summarized in the Non-motorized and
Transit cliapters of this plan.
Auburn partners with King County Metro Transit on the 497 bus route, whieh provides peak
hour service from Lakeland Hills to the Auburn Station. Auburn and King County Metro Transit
hope to eontinue this relationship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in
Auburn.
King Counry Road Services Division is resp.onsible for maintaining and regulating the roadway �
network in King Counry,including the Totem and Klump portions of King Counry located inside
the Ciry limits. King Counry Road Services has a number of programs and plans in place that I
regulate development and other activities affecring their roadwa.y network.
Chupter l. Iratrn�lra�tion pu�f �_¢
ORD.E Page 194 of 751
� .j
�17Y�� � '" -�� Comprehensive Transportation P1an
"`�` � �W�INGT�N
PIERCE COUNTY
Auburn partners with Pierce Transit on the 497 bus route,which provides peak hour service from
Lakeland Hills to the Aubum Station. Auburn and Pierce Transit hope to continue this
relarionship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in Auburn.
Auburirn also participates in The Regional Access Mobiliry Parrnership (RAMP); a regional
coalirion corriprised of both public and private sector interests dedicated to improving mobiliry in
the South Puget Sound and Washington State.
C4UNTYWIDE PLANNIiVG P4LICIES
Under tlie Growth Management Act, King and Pierce Counties have adopted Countywide
Planning Policies to guide development in both incorporated and unincorporated areas of their
jurisdicrions. The policies support counry and regional goals to provide a variety of mobility
options and establish LOS standards that emphasize the efficient movement of people and not
just vehicles. The Countywide Planning Policies are also important because they provide direction
for planning and development of potential annexation areas.
PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
The Puget Sound Regional Couneil (PSRC) sets pblicy for King, Pierce; Kitsap, and Snohomish
counties through its long-range planning document, Vi.rion 2040, and its regional transportauon
plari, Transportation 2040. Both documents encourage future growth to be concentrated in regional
growth eenters. They also seek to provide a mulri-modal transportarion system that serves all
travel modes; acrively en¢ouraging the use of alternatives to single occupant vehicles. Another
important policy theme is a focus on maximizing the efficiency of the transportation system
through transportation demand management (I'Dl� and transportation system management
(TSN� strategies,as well as completing critical links in the network.
Auburn'.s Transportation Plan is required to be consistent with PSRC's regional planning efforts.
ADJACEiVT CITIES
The Ciry recognizes the importance of coordinated and strong inter-jurisdictional acrion because
transportarion impacts do not stop at local boundaries. The City works closely with neighboring
ciries and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to address transportation issues. These neighbors adopt
goals and policies that direcdy impact Auburn. In developing this pl.a..n, arialysis was undertaken to
ensure tliat all transportation system improvements are compatible with neighboring jurisdictions.
CITY OF KENT
The City of Kent shares Auburn's northern bord.er and several regional tra.nsportation corridors
ineluding S 277th Street, SR 167, a.rid the West Valley Highway. Most recently; Auburn ha.s
coinpleted coordination witli Kent on the annexation of the S 277th Street from Auburn Way
North to the Green River into the Ciry of Auburn to allow the widening of S 277th Street
between Auburn Way N and L Street NE.
Chaf�ter 1.Introductiort Pq;e 1-5
ORD.E Page 195 of 751
�,����F ���`s� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
m°�.:���i��� �� � �
N �'`�� tiv,As H�SV G TC)N
C.ITY OF FEDERAL WAY � �`�
-�� ��� � �
The Ciry o'f Federal Way is located west of �� �� ��`� 'E ���� �
Auburn. Several roadways, most notably SR 18, �s'' ���;�' ;.F„f � ' �;
connect Auburn and Federal Way. Auburn and � . � :�' , , , � € ��
Federal Way regularly coordinate on both � , .i ,�= � ,
��
inotorized and non-motorized roadway I �3 W � � `, , �� �
improveme�nts affecting both jurisdictions. �`��� ' � ' ;�� �
� : �.
� ; E - .. �, ;
t
CITES OF SUMNER�ALGONA�PACIFIC�BONNEY i��"; ,,�';. ,� ��
LAKE ��` r i � �" �
T'he Ciry pa,rtners with its south,ern neighbors in ����, � �� � ��� `�"' ��� � ��
many respects, including street system planning, , '�;; >t � �� ; `{ g`
�_ "�� � a �:
transit planning, and regional trail plannirig. ; �' = �
Auburn is also working with Sumner, Pacific and ``'' '� P"�` � �� ��
k � :
Algona on roadway improvement projeets, � � .�* ;.� '
- �, 3,,� �
incl�uding the recent preservation of Boundary � " � � �,u � ,
.�`�r "`� sutian r
Boulevard in partnership with Algona, and i��,°�, '� , -� �;�
� ��:�� ,.. � � � ��
financial support of Pacific s project to widen F �,� � ��� � �
Stewart Road to the west of the White River. 'I'he �. `�`�:� ' ��°�� �
�-� , .�;.�
-`� ._._�����- ���
Ciry coordinates priinarily v�iith Bonney Lake for -�-�-��� -- �
provision of water service in the Pierce Counry Map 1-1 Adjacent]urisdictions
portion of the Ciry. However, efforts to coordinate transportation systems and services will likely
occur in the future. Partnerships with neighboring cities will continue to be an important factor in
successful transportation planning.
�flIUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MI'1� is situated in the southe.asterri poruon of the City and in
unincorporated King County, generally to the east of Auburri Way South (SR-164) and south of
SR-18. T'he Muckleshoot Tribe operates two major attractions in or near Auburn; the
Muckleshoot Casino and the White River Amphitheatre. Both of these activiry centers generate a
large number of vehicle trips. Commercial development on tribal l.ands is expected to inerease in
the future and must be evaluated during transportation planning efforts.
The City and tribe coordinate on a variety of transportation planning issues,both to accommodate
the capacity needs derived from traffic generated by tribal land uses and to ensure the tribe has a
functioning transportation system for its members.
The Muckleshoot Tribe has developed their own Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, a
Transportation Plan and a Tribal Transportation Improvement Program have been created to
identify transportation needs and plan for the next seven generations. One theine that is emerging
from this effort is the need to build a well-connected internal roadway system on the reservation.
Currently,Auburn Way South is the primary route for drivers and pedestrians traveling within the
reservation. This extensive internal network will increase transportation efficiency and most
im.portantly improve safety along the Auburn Way South corridor. The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
and the Ciry of Auburn have created a partnership to provide safety improvements along Auburn
Cbapter 1.Lztrodirc#ion Pahe 1-b
ORD.E Page 196 of 751
���YOe �`���� ��'� Comp�re�hen�sive Transportation Plan
� ������� �
� w:nsHxNc-raN
Way South. These improvements are currently under eonstrucrion and are anricipated to be
complete in the Spring of 2017.
During July 2015, the State Legislature passed a transportauon package which included a $15
million project to construct a new off-ramp from eastbound SR-18 to SR-1b4. At this time the
scope and alignment of this new connection are not know, however, the City will b.e working with
the MIT and WSDOT in the design process:
1.� A�cornpli�hrnents �ince the Last Plan
Since 2009, the Ciry has completed numerous transportation improvements, with an emphasis on
providing new road capacity, improving pedestrian and bicycle safety, preservation of e�cisting
infrastructure;and providing better access to regional transit services including commuter rail.
Table 1-1 shows the key projects completed since the 2009 plan. The completed projects list
includes the grade separauon of M Street SE and the A Street NW corridor, which provides a
parallel connection to Auburn Way N between downtown Auburn and S 272nd Street
Chapter 1.Introduction Pcrge 1-7
ORD.:E Page 197 of 751
� .,
�-����� ° Comprehensive Transportation Plan
:��= t
-� � �� �,��������
Table 1-;1. Transportation Impcovements Completed Since 2009
. , .
.- .
. . .
-- - ------ --_y ___ .
1 M St�eet SE Underpass M St SE(3`�SE to 8"'SE) Roadwa
_
2 A Street Corridor NW New Road(3rd NW to 14th NW) Roadway
- -- ---- . ___ _ _ ,
3 IT5 Improvements,Phase B S 277'"to City Hail Signai and ITS
__ _----- -_ ___ _ - ---
_ _. . __.
4 8th Street NE and R Street 8`"St NE&R Sf NE Signal&ITS
5 A Street SE Pedestrian Improvements A St SE(3rd St SE to 8"'St SE) Non-Motorized
_- =---- ----_ ... _ _ _
6 3Zth Street SE and R Street SE Pedestrian 37th SY SE(Olympic to R Si SE) Non-Motorized
Gonnector
7 SE 316th Place Traffic Calming Improvements 8E 316`�'Place(112`"to 116"') Safety
--- ----- - - - _.
- -- - - — - - -._
S Terrace Drive Re-channelization Terrace Dr.NW(15th to W St) Safety
9 2009 Sidewalklmprovements Citywide Non-Motorized
--- -
10 2009 Citywide Arterial Ravement Patching Citywide Preservation
_ . _ ._ _. . ___
11 Citywide Guardrail Improvements Citywide Safety
__ ____ _
12 F Sfreet SE and 4th Sfreet SE TraffcSignal F St SE&4�h St SE Intersection,Safety
_ _ _ _
13 West Valley Highway Improvements WVH,W Main St to SR-18 Roadway
14 Citywide School Zone FlasFiing Beacons Citywide Safety
15 2010 Local Street Preserva4ion Citywide Preservation
-- - -- --- - _ _ _
16 SquthAuburn ITS Improveme.n#s C St SW;A St SE Signal and ITS
__ _- --
17 S Division Street Main St to 3rd St SE7SW Roadway
18 8#h Street NE Re-channelization M St NE to 104�h Roadway
-.__. _ _
19 2010 Tra�c Signal Improvements Citywide Signal&ITS
2� Au.bu.rn VUay S.outh&M St ImprOvement's AWS&M Sf SE Intersection,Safety
21 2011 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation
_ _ ___- - --- - ------- .___
___ .__.___ _ __
22 8th and 104th Signal Improvements 8"'St NE'&104"'Ave SE Intersection,Safety
23 2011 Citywide SidewalK 1►nproVements Citywide Non-motorized
_ __ ___
24 Aubum Way South Phase 1 - Dogwood to Fir Roadway
-. ._...
25 Auburn Way South Phase 2- Fir to Hemlock Roadway
----
__ - - - -- - ____
26 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School 116t"Ave SE,SE 312`h S4 Safety
27 2011 Local Street Reconstruction Citywide Pre§ervation
_.. ____- -
28 2012 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation
-- _ ___
- _ _. _--_.
29 15th and WVH SW Repairs 15�"St SW&WVH Signal&ITS
30 Traffic Signal Battery Backup Improvemerrts BNSF Grade Crossi"ngs Signal&ITS
31 Cirywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvemen4s Citywide Signal&ITS,Safety
Chapter 1..batrodsrc#inn 1'q�e l-8
ORD.E Page 198 of 751
crrvc�F " .,��' ���
�,
3 �r Comprehensive Transportation Plan
,�, _ w��x1r:GTt��
. - . .
.- .
. . -
32 2013 Local Sfreet Preservation Citywide Preservation
33 VNesf Valley Highway Preservat'ion WVH, 15"'NW to 37"'NW Preservation
_ _. _ __ _._-- -.-. - ---_ . _
_ _ __ �
34 8th Street NE ITS lmproveme.nts 8"'3t NE M St to 104`�'Ave SE) Signal&ITS
35 2013 Sidewalk Repairs Cityw'ide Non-Moforized
36 2013 Arterial PaVement Patching Citywide Preservation
__ _ _------ _ .
_- -- --- --___ _ _
37 37th and B Street Pre-Signal 37`�'St NW&B St NW Signal.&ITS;Safety
- - - - ..__ _-- _ _-- --- --. _
38 29th,an,d A SE Repairs 29th&A St SE Signal&ITS
39 E Main Signal Pole Replacement E Main St&Aubum Way Signal&ITS
- --_ __- - - . - -- --
40 East Valley Hwy Overlay Peirce County Limits Preservation
41 2013 Arterial Crackseal Citywide Preservation
42 2014 Traffc Signal Improvements Citywide P[eservafion
-- - - -- -- - - -- _____ . .
43 2014 Local Street lmprovements Citywide Preservation
_ _ _.
44 2q14 Citywide Aderial Pavement Preservation Citywide PreserVation
45 2014 Citywide Arterial Crackseal Citywide Preservation
__ - ----_. _
__ _ _- ----- -
46 R Street SE Bicycle Lanes 17�h St SE to White River Non-Mqtorized
47 B Street NW Bicycle Lanes 3`'St NW to 30`"St NW Non-Motorized
48 Terrace Drive NW Bicycle Lanes 15�'SYNW fo W St NW Non-M.otorized
. _--- - - ---_--- - -
_ _ - --- - - - --. __
49 Dogwood Street SE Bicycle Lanes 21�St SE to Skyway Lane Non-Motorized
50 West Valley HigFiway Bicycle Lanes Main St to SR-48 Non-Motorized
_ ____ _ ___
51 14th Street NYV Bicycle Lanes B St NW to A St NE Non-Motorized
_ — ---- -.___ _--
----- ---- - _
52 116th Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 304`h St.to SE 312`h St Non-Motorized
- -_ ._
53 124th Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 316"'St to SE 320�h St Non-Motorized
54 132nd Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 304`"St to SE'312'"St Non-Motorized
--- _
55 M Street SE Bicycle Lanes 4"'St SE to 8"'St SE Non-Motorized
_- - ---- --- ---—
56 Evergreen Way SE` New Roadway Roadway
___- - - -._.
57 1 Street NE* New Roadway Roadway
__ ___--
*These projects were constructed by others as part of private development projects
�.. '� C IZ tl�tl
The following three chapters are organized according to the three primary transportation mode.s
in Auburn: the sueet system (Chapter 2), the non-motorized system (Chapter 3), a.nd the
transit system (Chapter 4). Each ehapter contains a needs assessmerit and discussion of the
future system,including proposed projects or improvements.
Cha�ter 9.Irttraduction 1'v�e 1-9
QRp.E Page 199 of 751
,- � a�`
�a��°� � ��Y Comprehensive Transportation P1an
T..�B��T�$.�
. �,������-���
The reinaining chapters cover subjects pertaining to all three system types. Chapter 5 details the
Ciry's transportation objecrives and policies. Chapter 6 discusses funding sources that can be used
to finance fizture network improvements. Chapter 7 identifies a monitoring and evaluation
strategy to ensure the document remains relevant and that progress is made towa.rds
implemeritation of the Plan.
. t�ff e�� r��:s
Implementation of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan requires numerous resources,
ineluding staff time. All departments play a role in exeeuting the Plan, but the Communiry
Development & Publie Works (CDP� Department is the implementation lead. The CDPW
Department employs engineers, planners, technical and support staff, and maintenance and
operations personnel to mainta.in and improve the City's transportation system. Nonetheless, staff
performs many functions and dedicating suffieient resources to carry out the goals of this plan
conrinues to present challenges. Figure 1-1 identifes the basic organization of the CPDW
Department.
Figure 1-1 Tran.sportauon Program Staff Resources (201.5)
, .��
_.. i,.x �: '.;t:k:� '�,
.�� h� �� '',
S� a�a � ' :ia., � �. �;
,��� � .
...�,�., .e Yle"°(k�x�,U � �
�ii�.!Y �'�#&!�P.��.t��g �4 II
a
+�}I'V .
i(�. ' �� `�v�'�'Rd�}"kt"r`� `e t`4 �1i� fW�. �� }4a �. '$ a. �g��
%,�S '�� . �?.'R �+fi �`�` p y "i..a� C..
.a�� _ . n s ;��i u �4 ��'� �. }G � "�
* � ° 'r
` p �'. .•��n,... �-��'� . ,�a", :r��
��"� � i�.. ,ta+. � -
`feA:srdi>%ro�.,. �„_�" '�..
.a �r g=. r.,. -..: __ � F . . .r . .
��. s_ w . .a .- . . �� .
v
_ ..� &.�. - -�"- , :� a �. •, p '
,.�., _ ,a� . � .s .'-a� � _ .
<, y. ,
� x ..
..: - 's'�e+ ..� 'a� sai - �.`�,..
.
- - v'�"�=p�.�.., � � '� .i � �'
=z , • � . ..� . : .
. . � �
.;�., .. . .. � ..
,. > � �*,��x.3"tt``�1'� e R���,�...�;�__ + :,,,�,.�,'
�•.:
�c+ a,'��..
�� >
Cha�ter 1. Introduction ('a�c %-10
ORD.E Page 200 of 751
� >�
������� � h � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�������
", WASHthGTC)N
Chapfier 2.
��' ; ' � � �' � r ��
,rc �.
��� ,_� `a�R '� `� #e; �
�_. "�` �.�.i a .i �"..:.�. ,� ,.�. `�. .^'. °,
�r� �1 1�
� '� .:.:,'� �{yi�
T'he Ciry is served by an egtensive street network, which „q�,�;,, �
�w�
includes highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets. ' �`� ''
The Aubu..rn tr.ansportation system is designed to ���. ; � ...-s .
`�-� ;
accornmodate all modes of travel. This chapter describes .�
the network and how well it serves the Ciry both existing
and future.
Auburn Way S at M Street SE
2.1 ExistAng Street Syst�rn
FUNCTIt)NAL CLASSIFICATION
The street system functions as a network. Funcrional classification is the hierarchy by which streets and
highways are defined aecording to the character of service they provide, There are three main classes
of streets in Auburnc arterials; collectors, and local streets. E�usung street classif cations are sliown in
Map 2-1. All streets have been classified using the Federal Funcrional Classification system guidelines.
No significant changes have been made to the classification of City streets from the previous
Compre.hensive Transportation Plan.
The Auburn Engineering Design Standard.r identifies design standards for each rype of City street, in
conformance with WSDOT and AASHTO standards.
From a planning perspecrive, acknowledgment and proper designation of funcuonal classifications
allows for the preservarion of right-of-way for future transportation corridors, whether the corridor
provides access to car, HOV, transit, bike, or pedestrian use. Functional classification helps establish
corridors that will provide for the future movement of people and goods, as well as emergeney vehicle
access. Proper designation is crucial to the planning effort;as development occurs, accommodation for
the appropriate transporta.tion corridors should be incorporated into development plans.
STATF,HIGHI�'A��S
SR-18—connects I-5 to I-90 through Auburn. Within the City limits, SR-18 has interchanges with SR-
167, West Valley Highway, C Street, SR-164/Auburn Way S, Auburn Black Diamond Road, and SE
304th Street providing access to iiowntown Auburn and Lea Hill. It is classified as both a Higliway of
Statewide Significance (HSS) and a Narional Highway System (NHS) route for the entire corridor
segment. SR-18 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within the
City limits:
SR-167 =also known as the Valley Freeway, serves as an alternative to I-5, connecririg South King a.nd
north Pierce counties to the I-405 corridor to the north. SR-167 is designated as bot.h HSS and NHS.
Within the Ciry limits, SR-167 has interchanges with SR-18, S 277th Street, 15th Street NW, and 15th
Street SW. SR-167 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within
the Ciry limits.
Cfiapter 2. The Street Sy;ctem Page 2- 1
ORD.E Page 201 of 751
���Y��� � Comprehensive Transporfiation Plan
�����
��vns���r�&c rc��
SR-164 - is a 15-mile roadway corridor beginning at tlie SR-18'interchange with Auburn Way S. The
corridor is aligned southeast through the City, connecting with the Nluckleshoot Tribal Reservation
and. White River Amphitheater, and unincorporated King Counry before terminating in the Ciry of
Enumclaw at its junction with SR=410. SR-164 is a Ciry street whie:h is part of a State Highway. It is
classified as an urban minor arterial by WSDOT, and.also a HSS. The City of Auburn elassifies is,as, a
principal arterial. SR-164 does not have the same access restrictions as fourid on SR-18 and SR-167.
Ax�'��tz,�.z..s
Arterials are the highest level of City street elassification.There are two types of arterials in Auburn.
Princigal Arterials are designed to move traffic between locauons within the region and conriect with
the freeway system. Design emphasis is placed on providing movement for both inter- and intra-ciry
traffic. As such, these facilities typically carry the highest Eraffie volumes, experience the longest vehicle
trips,and have the highest speed limits of all Ciry streets:
Direct access to adjacent land uses is permitted, although these streees are most likely to have limited
access,in an effort to enhance safety along these corridors; and increase capacity for through vehicles..
These arterials are the framework street system for the Ciry and usu.ally extend beyond the City limits,
conneeting with neighboring jurisdictions. They are typically construeted to accomrnodate five-lanes of
traffic with speed limits of 30 to 45 mph. The design year average daily traffic (AD'1� is greater than
15,000 ve.hicles per day. Principal arterials are heavily utilized as bus routes, carrying both local and
regional service. Typically, on-street b.ieycle fac.iliries are not a.ppropriate for Principal Arterials and
bicyclists are accommodated on adjacent separated trails or on parallel bicycle routes. Pedestria.ns are
accommodated on sidewalks.
Mirior Arterials interconnect and augment the principal arterial system by providing access to and
from the principal arterials and freeways: They serve moderate length trips with slightly less mob'ility
than principal arterials and distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas. Minor arterials inay serve
second,ary traffic generators such as business centers; neighborhood shopping centers, major parks,
multifamily resideritial areas, medieal eenters, larger religious institutions, and community activiry
centers. WhIle minor arterials should not enter neighborhoods, they do provide aecess between
neighborhoods. They are typically constructed to accommodaee four to five lanes of traffic with speed
limits of 30 to 35 mph and a design year ADT of 10,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. Minor arterials.are
frequently utilized as bus routes; have sidewalks to comfortably aceommodate pedestrians and may
include bicycle lanes, as appropriate.
COLLECTE7ItS
Collectors are a step below arterials in tlze Ciry classifica.tion system.There are three rypes of collectors
in Auburn.
Urban Residential Collectors are used to connect local streets and residential neighborhoods to
communiry activity centers and riiinor and pririci,pal arteria..ls. Urban Residential Collectors are typically
constructed to accommodate two travel lanes �vith medians and xurn pockets at inter.sections or two
travel lanes with bicycle laries. The posted speed limit is generally 30 mph and the design year ApT is
2,500 to 10,000,vehicles per day. Urban Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for
some transit service,including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services.
C;fia�ter 2:I he Street Sy.rtenz Pa{e 2-2
ORD:E Page 202`of 751
� ,,;.
����� j� � ° Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� 1�� �����
��������-�N
��:'F �. Rustic Residential Collectors are routes located in.
�� � .� �� � ��ti
''`a "- areas with less intensive larid uses associated with
�'� the Residenrial Conservaricy land-use designarion.
' They carry traffi.c betwe.en local and arterial streets.
,,,. , Rustic Resideririal Collectors provide access to all
, levels of arterials, are typically construeted to
' accommodate two lanes with gravel shoulders on
both sides, and have a spee.d limit of 30 to 40 mph.
� T'he gravel shoulder rriag be reduced on one side to
provide a wider shoulder on tlie other. for equestrian
_ _
access or bicycle travel. Rustic Resiclential Collectors
Residentia/Co/%tor, U�bdn do not have sidewalks and genera,lly do not carry
transit services except for paratransit a.nd possibly
dial-a-ride-transit.The design year ADT is 1;000 to 5,000 vehicles per clay.
Non-Residential Golleetors provide intra-community access by connecting non-residential areas
such as indu..strial and commercial areas to minor and principal arterials.They may serve neighborhood
traffc generators such as stores; elernentary schools, religious institutions; clubhouses, small hospitals
or clinics, areas of small multifamily developments, as well as other commercial and industrial uses�
Non-Residenrial CoIlectors are typically constructed to accommodate two lanes and a center two-way
left-turn lane, with a speed limit of 30 mph and may include bicycle lanes. `I'he design year ADT:is
2,500 to 5',000 vehicles per day.. Non=Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for
some transit service,including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services.
Lt)Cr1L ST12t�:liTS
Local Streets are the most common street type in the City, Local streets eomprise all facilities not part
of one of the tugher classificarion systems. Local streets primarily provide direct access to abutting land
and to the higher order streets. Service to through traffic is discouraged. There are four ca,tegories of
local streets.
U.rban Local Residential Streets provide,access to abutting reside.ntial parcels. They offer the lowest
level of mobility among all street classificatioris. The street is designed to conduet traffic between
dwelling units and higher order streets. As the lowest order street in the hierarchy, the street us.ually
carries m..inimal through traffic and includes short streets, cul-de-s.acs, and courts. The s.peed limit is
generally 25 mph and the design year ADT is 200 to 1;200 vehicles per day. Urban Local Residenrial
Streets have sidewalks to accommodate pedesxrians. Bicyclists may travel either on the sidewalk or
_
within the travel lane depending on their level of comfort. Tra.nsit service is generally limited to dial-a-
ride transit arid paratransit.
Rustic Loca1 Residential Sueets serve areas associated with the Residential Conservancy zoning
designarion. They provide access to adjacent land and distributing traffic to and from the arterials,
_ __ _ _ _
residenrial collectors, rustic; and local streets. Rusric Local Residenrial Streets are two-lane roadways
with gravel shoulders and a speed limit of 25 mph. The design year ADT is 100 to 1,000 vehicles per
day, Because these streets have low traffic volumes, bicyclists can comfortably share the travel lane
with motorized vehicles; Since Rusric Local Residential Streets do not have.. sidewalks,pedestrians walk
Cha�iter 2. 'I'he Street System P�rge 2-3
ORD.E Page 203 of 751
� ..- ..
�����°� � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
., J��;�'►����
� "--�- �vASHII�GTc)N
along the shoulder of the road. Transit serviee is very infrequent and most likely limited to paratransit
and possibly dial-a-ride-transit.
Local Non-Residential Streets provide direct access to higher order classification streets and serve
priinarily industrial and manufacturing land uses, They offer a lower level of mobility and
accommodate heavy vehicle traffic. Typically they have two travel lanes with a speed limit of 25 mph
and the design year ADT is 400 to 1,20:0 vehicles per day. Local Non-Residential Streets have
sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists may travel on the shoulder of the road (Class IV
bieycle facility), although bicyele travel may not be as comfortable as on Local Residential Streets due
to a greater frequency of trucks and other heavy vehicles. Transit service is generally limited to dial-a-
ride transit and paratransit.
Private Streets can be appropriate for local access in very limited usage. They provide direet access to
Ciry streets and should be limited to those streets accessing properties within a planned area and
immediately adjacent properries: Private streets at a minimum are built to the same design and
construction standards as a local residential street.
Ar�l��:��s��vD AccLss Ti�c�rs
Alleys provide vehicular access to abutring properties, generally through the rear or side of the
prope_rty, Alleys can be public or private and serve several purposes including access managemenr and
the alleviation of traffic problems on city streets. Alleys should provide through access to eity streets or
adequate turnaround space if through access is not feasible. Alleys shall be constructed to allow for
general-purpose and emergency access at all times.
Aeeess Tracts, sometimes referred to as shared driveways, provide vehicular access for lots that do
not abut a street or alley. They are most common In panhandle lots or rear lots tha.t do not have street
or alley access. Access tracts are privately owned and maintained. They must provide for sufficient
vehicular movement and turnaround space, be free of temporary and permanent obstructions, and
provide for emergency access.
TRAFFIC VOLU�IIES
Average daily traffic counts were obtained from data collected during 2013. Map 2-2 shows the
existing average weekday daily traffie volumes on Ciry arterials.
A major contributor to the high traffic volumes on City arterials is traffic passing through the City.
This pass-through traffic originates in surrounding jurisdictions and uses City streets to aceess the
major regional highways, sueh as SR-18 a.nd SR-167. Be.tween 25 and 30 percent of all vehicle trips on
the Auburn street system begin and end outside the City. T"he City is committed to working with
WSDOT to improve the state highway system, thereby reducing the demand on the City street system.
SPEED �IMITS ',
The City designates speed limits as a means of alerting drivers to safe and appropriate travel speeds for
a pa.rticular corridor segment. Typically, the higher the classification of roadway, the higher the posted
speed limit: Except for school zones avhich are posted at 20 mph when ehildren are present, speed
limits in the Ciry range from 25 mph (typically for local roads) to 45 mph on some principal arterials.
The Ciry routinely monitors corridors to ensure appropriate speed limits are in place. Unless otherwise
posted the statutory legal speed limit in the Ciry is 25 mph.
Cfiapter 2. T he.Street Sy.ctenT Page 2-4
ORp.E Page 204 of 751
��TY�r --_ � ��` � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.��.����
,�� '""� WASHINGTC7N
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AF�D SIGNS
Traffic signals, signs, and pavement markings are used to inform road users, thereby increasing the
effective use of the roadway by moving traffic more efficiently and safely. The City uses the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as guidance for design, construerion, and placement of
these design elements in the right of way.
FREIGHT
Auburn is an important freight hub in the Puget Sound region, and the efficient movement of freight,
through and within the C.iry, is critical to Auburn's econoiinic stabiliry. Both rail and true,k freight,
originating largely in the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle,pass through Auburn regularly.
RAIL
The Union Pacific Railroad (LTP) a.nd Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) have rail lines
running tlirough Auburn. 'The UP line runs north-south, to the east of the Interurban Trail. BNSF haS
a double-track, federally designated, high-speed railroad line running north-south. BNSF and Sound
Transit are planning to add a third track to this north-south line by 2016. This third track is being
installed to handle increased commuter rail traffe and freight traffic.The BNSF Stampede Pass line
runs east-west through downtown Auburn; entering Auburn at the east end of town near Auburn-
Black Diamond Road and merging with the north-south line just south of the Aubum Starion.
In addirion,BNSF operates a rail yard between A Street SE and C Street SW, south of SR-18. In the
future, this area .m.ay develop as a .m,.ulri-modal rail yard,p"romptirig the need to miriga..te increased truck
traffic through capacity improvements. BNSF also has plans to increase traffic on the Stampede Pass
line, the east-west rail line running through Auburn. To accommodate this increase the Ciry recendy
completed the grade separation of M Street SE. Both the BNSF norEh-south line and the Stampede
Pass line are handling an increase in rail freight traffic. BNSF handles a number of unit (solid) coal
trains traveling to t.erminals in northwest Wash'tngton State as well as unit oil trains carrying crude oil.to
northwest Washington state refineries. While loaded coal and oil trains are usually handled on the
.north-south line, some of these empty trains return east to Wyoming or North Dakota via the
Stampede Pass line.
The pavement at the crossing of the Union Paci.fic Railroa..d at 15t1i $treet SW is in very poor
condition. Rehabilitation of the pavement is a high prioriry for the Ciry, and a project has been
programmed to reconstruct 15th Street SW from C Street SW to the railroad trac.ks.
TRUCK
The Ciry has designated truck routes fbr through freight movement in an effort to maximize the
efficienry of and protect the roadway infrastructure. Current City of Aub.urn truck routes are shown in
Map 2-3. Truck routes, established by Ciry ordinanee, are designated for roadways that incorporate
special design eonsiderations such as Street grades, continuity, turning radii, street and lane widths,
pavement strength;and overhead obstruction heights.
In addition, the Washington State Freight and Goods Transportarion System (FGTS) is used to
classify roadways, freight railroads and waterways according to the annual freight tonnage the.y carry as
directed by RCW 47.05.021. Map 2-4 shows the 2013 classificarions of City streets. The FGTS is
primarily used to establish funding eligibility for Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB)
Cbapter 2. The Street Sy.rtem Page 2-S
ORD.E Page 205 of 751
-..... K r.s1 ..
��r7°� -�-� � �- ° Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� " �_. � Gvnst��nt�TON
grants, fulfill federal reporting requirements, support transportarion planning process, and plan for
pavement needs and upgrades. The FGTS classifies roadways using the following categories;
e T1: more than 10 million tons per year
o T2: 4 million to 10 million tons per year
• T3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year
e T4: 100,000 to 300,000 tons per year
o T5: at least 20,000 tons in 60 days and less than 100,000 tons per year
Truck freight tonnage values are derived from actual or estimated truck traffic counts and converted
into average weights by truck rype.
The City expects tha.t the majoriry of regional truck trips will take place on state highways. However,
recognizing that trips through the City are sometimes necessary, Auburn ha.s designated a network of
north-south and east-west corridors as truck routes,which are built to truck standards. In addition; the
City has designated future truck routes,which will be designed and constructed to accommodate truck
traffic, as opportunities arise. FMSIB has expressed an interest in these first and last mile connectors
which provide access between these classified freight faciliries arid port, rail yard, distriburion eenters
and truck terminals.
Auburn has significant industrial and commercial development throughout the Ciry. The Ciry
encourages local delivery trucks to use the designated truck network as much as po.ssible, b.ut
recognizes that trips on non-truck routes are necessary. The City is committed to supporting local
industry, business, and residenrial needs and recognizes that the abiliry to ship and receive freight is
essential to the success of many businesses. To implement this policy, the City will collaborate with
local businesses to improve fre.ight aceess, while maintaining the roadway infrastructure, whenever
possible. This may include adopting Giry Code and updaring the Auburrt Engineenng Design a.nd.
Construction Standard.r in a manner that favors these prioriries. However, in a limited numtier of key
loc.a.tions, trueks may be prohibited due to existing design elements which do not support trucks,
protecting sensitive areas such as downtown arid residential neighborhoods, and to extend pavement
life.
_ _
_. ,
` S�IFETY
i The City places the tughest prioriry ori providing a
safe transportation system for all travel modes.
� � �$ Continual efforts are made to make changes to the
_ � �,� �. �� —�-
,,� , street system in a manner that improves safery and
:� s �������
�-�� � �`� ������ ,., ', .� n�°�':;, , decreases the likelihood and severiry of collisions.
�.� �:�� � � � � �� -�� � ��� Pedestrian crossings and other� non-motorized
�� ��
- � e�" ����� ��,���� safety issues are discussed in the following chapters.
�
�� �� �� � � '� ;`�� ��, ����� At grade railroad crossings; emergency response
� � �
'� ; � �������p � ���_ ��„ needs and collisions related to the street system are�
' �� ������� ,;„ �� �; discussed�below.
M����, . �
At Grade Railroad Crossings
Truck Tra�c Using S 177th Street
C{�apter 2. The Street Sy.rtem Prrge 2-6
ORD.E Page 206 of751
*
�t7Y��j �-� �� � ° Comprehensive Transportation P1an
�����
;.�'� -=�' w�s�►r��croN
At grade railroad crossings create conflict points between vehicles and non-motorized-road users and
rail traffic, Auburn has several at grade railroad crossings; the Union Pacifie track.s cross 4_4th St NW,
37th Street NW, 29th Street NW; West Main Street, and 15th Street SW. The BNSF tracks cross 37th
Street NW, 29th Street NW,3rd Street NW,W Main Street, and Auburn-Black Diamond Road.
With more than 60 trains passing through the City each day, the Ciry has many at grade crossings, each
with unique safety implicarions. The Ciry coordinates with railroad operators and the State to upgrade
the crossings whenever possible. For instance, the project to grade separate M Street SE at the BNSF
Stampede Pass tracks by lowering M Street SE under the railroad overpass was completed during 2013.
Recent upgrades include the construction of a pre-signal where 37th Sueet NW crosses the BNSF
tracks, to stop westbound vehicles on 37th Street NW to the west of the grade crossing in advance of
the traffic signal at B Street NE.'The pre-signal will prevent vehicles from stopping on the crossing.
BNSF is currently aonstrucring a third rail mainline between Seatde and Auburn to improve service
and reliability for passenger raiL The new mainline is located on the west-side of the exisring tracks.
__ .
T'he third mainline will reduce vehicle storage for westbound vehicles on W Main Street and 3rd SEreer
NW between the tracks and traffic signals with C Street NW. The Ciry is working with BNSF to
upgrade the erossings to provide addirional time to clear vehicles and pedestrians from these crossings
before the gates come down.
Impacts at the remaining grade crossings are anticipated to worsen in the future due to increased
vehicle demands at the crossings, combined with incre.ased rail traffic, resulting in more frequent, and
longer duration,closures.
E��:r�c�NCY R�:sronsL�NU MnN�ct:���rT
Providing residents with quick responses in
°"� � emergency situations is a high priority for the Ciry.
�� u �,,,� � � The City maintains a Comprehensive E'mergency
�,� d� � Management Plan and supporting plans which
�"' � '" �� A° ' ��`�'��� '��� identify critical faciliries that should be maintained
� ��� � ��"' i � .���
�ti���°
' � b�ii�, �Ij� ° as a first prioriry during catastrophic events: Critical
��'��'� � �� transportation facilities; generally include Ariricipal
Arterials,bridges and major evacuation routes.
�'�� �fl � F �` ' a, � . In addition, the Ciry works to provide a street
� �»� .:�. �. �.�a;�,� ,. �� � �
network that will ensure mulriple alternate routes for
BNSF Freight Train at West Main Street emergency vehicles. Fire and police response
vehicles are equipped with traff e sigrial controls
that enable emergency vehieles to secure safe and rapid passage along signalized corridors. In addition,
the Ciry has mutual-aid agreements with nearby emergency response operators to ensure adequate
coverage in case of road closures or other obstacles that would otherwise prevent timely emergenry
response..
COLLISION�
The City collects and reviews collision data to identify intersecrion and roadway locations where
potential hazards exist. Potential safery problems are identified using the Safety Prioriry Index System
(SPIS) methodology, an effecrive problem idenCification tool for evaluating locations with higher
Cl�a�fier 2. The Street Sy.rtem Puge 2-7
ORD.E Page 207 of 751
.��°�Y�}F -� � �-� � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��►�: -
' �_ � wt�s�rrtieroN
r�`�
collision histories. The SPIS score for a location considers three years of data and considers frequency,
collision rate, and severiry.
If a hazard is identified, corrective measures can then be identified and implern.ented as appropriate..
While the Ciry relies primarily on its own data, collision data from other sources,including neighboring
jurisdictions and the State,is utilized whenever available.
�. �r�et �t� d�r s � evel�-of- e i��
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to establish service levels for the street
network and to provide a means for correcring deficiencies and meeting future needs. Transportarion
professionals use Ehe term `level-of-service' (LOS) to measure the operational performance of a
transportarion faciliry; su¢h as a street corridor or intersection. This measure considers perception by
motorists and passengers in terms of speed; travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions and
delays,comfort, and convenience.
The Ciry currendy uses a single-mode LOS system based upon vehicular travel. In the future, a muIti-
modal system whieh includes transit,pedestrians, and bicyclists should be developed and adopted.
The currendy adopted LOS methodology give.s letter designations from `A' through `F', with LOS A
representing the best operating conditions, and LOS F representing the �vorst: LOS can be quantified
in different terms, depending on the transportation facility. Definitions for eacli level-of-service and I
the methodologies for calculating the level-of-service for various faciliues are contained in the Highivay
Capacity Manual (Transj�ortation I�esearch Board, 2000). The Ciry most commonly uses corridor level-of
service for accessing facilities. Generally, this is considered the most coinprehensive way to determine
vehicular traffic impacts. The following descriptions provide some guidance for interpreting the
rneaning of each LOS letter for corridor LOS on ciry streets.
� LOS A describes primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent
of the free-flow speed (FFS) for the given street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their
ability to maneuver within the traffic streain. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal.
FFS is the average speed of vehicles on a given facility, measured under low-volume conditions,
when drivers tend to drive at their desired speed and are not constrained by control delay.
Control delay is the total elapse time from a vehicle joining the queue until its departure from the
stopped position at the head of the queue. This includes the time required to decelerate into the
queue and accelerate back to free-flow speed.
■ LOS B describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70
percent of the FFS for the street class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only
slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant.
■ LOS C describes stable operations, however, abiliry to maneuver and change la.ne.s in midblock
locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination,
or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the FFS for the
street class.
� LOS D borders on the range in which small increases in the number of vehicles may cause
substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to poor
progression through the signalized intersections along a corridor,inappropriate signal timing, high
Cfiaf�ter 2. 'I he SCreet Sy.rtenl Pa�e 2-8
- ,
ORD.E Page 208 of 751
�
��TY��r �r �-=� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.���� ���
� Wr'rSHi[�fGTQN
traffic volumes, or a combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are abont 40 percent of
FFS..
o LOS E.is charaeterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of 33 percent or less or the
FFS. Such operat�ons are caused by a combination of adverse signal progression, close signal
spacing,high volumes,extensive delays at crirical intersecrions, and inappropriate signal timing.
■ LOS F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one-.
fourth of the FFS. Intersectio.n congesrion is likely crirical at signalized locations,with high delays,
high volumes,and extensive queuing.
CITY LOS STANDARDS AND CURRENT LOS
It is necessary to define LOS standards for transportarion facilities to enforce the concurreney
requirements of the GMA. If development causes a faciliry to degrade below a defined LOS standard,
concurrency requires that the development make improvement to restore operations to the LOS
standard or better,or the permit for that development be denied.
Aubum defines unsarisfactory LOS as: an unaceeptable increase in hazard or un.accepta.ble decrease in
safery on a roadway; an acceler.a..ted deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed
regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements that can reasonably result in
accelerated deterioration of the street pavement (typically addressed Ehrough the payment of the truck
impact fee); an una:cceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an interseerion where two truck
routes meet on the City arterial and eollector network; an increase in congestion wliicli constitutes an
unacceptable adverse environmental impact under the State Environmental Aolicy Act; or the inability
of a faciliry to meet the adopted LOS standard.
The City uses corridor LOS as its primary measurement of transportarion system impacts. The City
corridors typically used for analyzing LOS are shown in Map 2-5, although the Ciry may require
analysis of a different segment in order to assess tlie full LOS impacts. All arterials and collectors in
Auburn have designated I:OS standards. The LOS standard for these corridors is primarily LOS D
with the exceprion of some corridors that may operate as LOS E or F, with a specified ma�cimum
travel time.
While the City uses a. weekday PM peak hour based LOS systefn;weekday AM peak hour LOS impacts
may be required to be analyzed in situation.s where unique condirions are likely to result in a LOS
deficienry during the weekday AM peak hour.
Table 2-1 idenrifies Auburn's LOS Standards, as well as the 2014 corridor LOS. As indicated in the
table; LOS was calculated for many of Auburn's street corridors using traffic count data collected
during 2014.
Cl�a�ter 2. I he Street Sy.rtem Pcrge 2-9
ORD.E Page 209 of 751
z= '°�i#
«TY�}� - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� �
` wn�t��r�r,:rc�n�
Table 2-1 Corridor Level of Service—Existing 2014 Weekday PM Peak Hour
__ _ .
s � ' °
o . .. . . .. .
1 _Auburn Wa N . _ _ 1,5fh,$4:NE S 277th St D C C
�2 .;: Auburn.Wa`�°,N- ' � � ��E MaCn St -_ .t�;16th�St'�NE " ���_ E._ ... ....s�� D.. � . . D�.� .��
3 Auburn Wa S E Main St M St SE D C D
�4�_ �Auburn Wa �S. � �M SfSE� � ,��.Academ Dr��SE," ,:`� D' `; `�B � G �`
5 M StlHarve Auburn Wa N E Main St E D D
_ _ _ _ __ _ .
_ _ , _ - - �
�__
_. __� .. .
arve`.'� � am _t ��.Aubu�n Wa�.� _ p p Cv�� �
8. 37th St NE/NW West Valle H Aubum Wa N D C C
� _.9��� 15th St NE/NW °� West�Valle � � � '���Auburn Wa �N�:W.. _. F** � �:�;':D.�,..� � . D�� �
10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valle Access Rd D B C
_ _
_ _
11�� Main��St .:; �. �:-�'.W+est:Valle �H� �'RSt<� � ���:=� D: � ; D.� D` �.
=z�
12 15th St SW West Valle H_ __ C_St SW D D D
13� C St,SW `� ;_ __.. _.Ellie son Rd� �WSR-18_. _., . _ __ D �� B C_`",�
14 West Valle H 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C
_
�15_>_ S 277th St , �� Fronta e.Rd�....... .. �i St_NE ��..-:, . �.... �E_ , �r �� � Cr',
1:6 R St SE/Ke�se Wa Howard Rd Lake 7°a s P .. D B_ __ B.___
17,` L'ake:Ta� " ,P � . ',� �`=;,East Vafle�:�H� �:���. '���Kerse"'`Wa' SE�� � � � 'D`. - ,"" C ` C' ��
18 A_St_NW/B St_NW_ 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B
�19���' 8th 3t NEIle"�a_HiII�Rd� ` Hanre: �Rd �� �� ���124th Ave SE:�� ` E; ', ;. C--__ � .B���-
22 SE 312th SU132nd Ave SE 724th Ave SE SR-18 D B B
25��� 105th PI SEI,SE 320th St. �_�__.Lea HiII,Rtl.�. . _ ',„�124th Ave SE��� � � D� , ��r'=� A �_�C` .'`
26 Lakeland Hills S_E Lake Ta s P A St SE D __ __ D _ _ C
27�r� 29th'�-St SEJRivennialk Dr, � ��A St SE � � � �Aubu�n Wa'.S=�:`_ �� ;� � D' -��` �� . p �� � . .C��, ,:
31_ :3rd_St SW/Cross St C St . _. Auburn Wa S E F E
,. .
°�3`�� 41st$tSElEllin�sortRd �,.°ASt"5� ._ ._,�CStSE . '..._ ��-- E' ��_..F .. ��. _ . .Fw
35 West Valle H 15th St NW 15th St SW E D E
_ -
*Corridor segments within Downtown Aubum may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Aubum Downtown
Plan.All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better,unless otherwise indicated.
«" Total 4rayel time in fhe eas4bound directfon cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS
standards.
As shown in the table, each of the corridor segments currendy meets LOS standards except for
eastbound Gross Street and both eastbound and we.stbound 41 st Street SE, all of which currently
operate at LOS F.The poor operarions on these segments can be attributed to their short length,
closely spaced signalized intersections, and limited storage lengths, combined with high volumes of
Eurning traffic.
In the majoriry of cases it is the traffie operations at the interseetions along a corridor which limit the
capacity of the corridor,rather than the capaciry of the roadway segments between intersecrions. This
is especially true along corridors with closely spaced intersections, such as Cross Street and 41st Street
SE,and corridors where two principal arterial roads interseet, such as Auburn Way S and M Street SE.
Along other corridors where the number of intersections is limited and the distanees between them are
greater,the corridor LOS may not identify a bottleneck at one or more of the intersections along the
overall eorridor.An example of this is along the Kersey Way corridor,where the overall corridor
operates at LOS B,but the intersection with 29th Street SE operates at LOS D,with the highest delays
and longest vehicle queue associated with southbound traffic on Kersey Way.
C{�apter 2. '1'he Street Sy.rten7 Page 2- >0
ORD.E Page 210 of 751
� ,x
��F �=���:° Comprehensive Trans�portation Plan
`��` ��' wnSHt�Gro�v� �
STATE HIGHVI/AY LOS
Amendments to the GMA in 1998 added new requirements for local jurisdictions to address state-
owned transportarion faciliries, as well as loeal transportation systein needs in their comprehensive
plans (RCW 47.06.140)� House Bill 1487, adopted by the Washington State Legislature in 1998,
requires that the transportation element of local compreliensive plans include the LOS standard's for
Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS). HB 1487 clarified that the concurrency requirement of the
GMA does not apply to HSS or other transporta.rion facilities and services of statewide significance.
I-IB 1487 also requires local jurisdicrions to estimate traffie ixnpacts to state-owned faeilities resulting
from land use assumptions in the Comprehensive Plan.
TxF WSDOT S'r�r;a.�Axn
_
WSDOT has idenrified a LOS D standard for all urban Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS)
according to the State Highway System Plan (HSP). All state highways within the Ci_ry of Auburn,
including SR-18, SR-167, and SR-164 are classified as urban Highways of Statewide Significance, and
therefbre have a LOS D standard.
LA1VD USE"s�T1tANSPO.RTAT1().N R:1;l.A'I'IC)NSHII'
Land use and the transportation system are intertwined, e.ach influencing the development of the
other: Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate how the future transportariori system can be improved to
best support both e�sting and proposed land-uses.
In 2003 Auburn was designated as a Regional Growth Center by the Puget Sound Regional Council as
part of the Vision 2040 plan. Designated regional growth centers are identified for housing and
e.mployment growth, as well as being eligible for regional tra..nsportation funding.
A broad overview of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan land use map's more intensive land use
designations shows industrial (light and heavy) designations in the west side of the valley tloor portion
of the City, extensive commercial development (light and heavy) located along Auburn Way N,
Auburn Way S, and A Street SE, and. sizable heavy commercial designated. areas near the SR-18 and
15t1i Street SW interchange (I'he Oudet Collection) and between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW
(Emerald Downs). Downtown Auburn is near the geographic center of the Ciry, located generally east
of Ehe Interurban Trail,north of SR-18,west of F Street SE/NE,and south of 3rd Street NW/NE and
4th Street NE. Residential development generally e�sts along the east side of the valley floor and the
surrounding hillsides of West Hill, Lea Hill, and Lakeland Hills.A major land use acriviry in Lea Hill to
the east includes the Green River College locaEed on SE 320th Street.
As with many ciries in South King and North Pierce counties, especially those along the SR-167
corridor, the local land use plan is characterized by a predominance of industrial land use designations.
The land use element identifies "Industrial" as the Ciry's second most predominant zoning designation
(residential being first). Consequently, the Ciry's land use pl.an establishes a development pattern that
has traf.fic generated by these industrial uses directed towards the State Highway System,
Another key fe.ature in the Comprehensive Plan land use element is a "Heavy Commercial"
designation at lbtli Street SW, adjacent to SR-167 and SR-18. This commercial designation is the site
of The Oudet Collection. The Oudet Collecrion attracts customers on a regional basis and impacts use
of the State Highway System, even more than the downtown, or the commercial development along
C(�apter 2. The Street Syrtem Page 2- 11
ORD.E Page 211 of 751
���Y��� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��..�=�.� '�
:- � wnsHahcrpN
Auburn Way and A Street SE. The same can also be said for Auburn Way N to the north of
downtown which serves as an automall,which attracts both local and regional traffia.
Downtown Auburn contains a mu�of land-uses including residential,commercial and industrial uses.
Commercial uses in the Downtown are fbcused along Main Street,Auburn Way and A Street SE and
tend to serve more local needs. Historically,this commercial development has served predominandy
local needs.. However, the presenee of the Auburn Station,Multi C.are; City Hall,and recent and
proposed new development projeets,combined with regulations and policies that encourage transit
oriented developments,downtown commercial development will serve a broader range of needs in the
future. Downtown Auburn also has the Cities most robust non-motorized infrastructure,including
both extensive pedestrian and bicycle facilities.This provides the opportunity for both residents and
employees to rely on pro�cimate transit services at the Auburn Station, combined with a robust non-
motorized transportation system for a portion of their transportation needs. The goal of this plan is to
continue to grow and expand the non-motorized transportation system to provide the same
transportation choices throughout the Ciry.
The City's Comprehensive Plan land use map focuses residential development in the eastern portion of
the valley and in the West Hill, Lea Hill, and the Lakeland Hills area. Access to the State Highway
System in Lea Hill is limited to SR-18 at SE 304th Street. Future impacts on the State Highway System
in the Lea Hill area.will primarily be coinmuter traffic due to the predominance of residential compre-.
henside plan designations in that area� and continued growth of Green River College. The
development of Lakeland Hills will also principally result in increased commuter traffic.
Future impacts to the State Highway System can generally be gauged by projected arterial link ADT
volumes at or near state highway ramps; This is, at best, only a general estimate since not all traffic
passing through these street segments is utilizing the State Highway System. Further, traffic using the
arterial segment may be originating from outside Auburn, and may therefore not result from
assumptions in Auburn's land use plan.
_ _
Several ciry arterials connect direcfly to SR-167 and SR-18. Some examples include C Street SW, West
Valley Highway, and Auburn Way South c.onnections with SR-18, and 15th Street NW and 15th Street
SW connections with SR-167. These streets are among the most heavily used in the City, a function of
their relationship to the State Highway System. SR-164 is also within the city limits. Year 2013 average
daily traffic (AD'I� volumes along SR-164 range from a low of 21,700 near the eastern ciry boundary
up to 35,900 along Auburn Way South near SR-18. These volumes are forecast to conrinue to increase
over the next 20 years. However, the growth is limited by the capacity of the roadway.
The State Highway System also impacts the City's local street system. A "pass-through" traffic pattern
results in significant traffic volume increases on the local arterial street system,. For example, many of
Auburn's weekday PM peak hour trips are work to home trips originating out.ride of the Auburn area
and desrined for residential areas out.cide of Auburn, including Pierce County and the Enumclaw
Plateau. 'I'his traffie exits state routes and travels through Auburn to avoid congestion on Ehe State
Highway System. This is evidenced liy increases in traffic counts within the City that clearly exceed
that which might be expected through anticipated growth and development patterns outlined in the
City's land use plan, such as at SR-164 at the eastern City limit.The City may implement measures that
encourage local traffic movements and discourage pass-through trips.
C{ia�te�•2. �1 he.Street.Sy.ctem PaXe 2- 12
ORD.E Page 212 of 751
��T�-�>F ' � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
AUBURN
� WASHINGTON
2.3 Future Street System
METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING FUTURE SYSTEM
TRAVEL FORECASTS
HOUSINGAND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
.�uburn has gro�vn rapidlv during the past decade, and housing and emplo}-ment are espected to
continue to increase significandy bv 2035, with the population reaching appro�imately 95,000
residents, as sho�vn in Figure 2-1. l�luch of the housing growth wi]1 come from higher densiry re-
development in the downtown area and the rapidly growing Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas.
Figure 2-1. Population, Housing, and Job Growth
FOR CITY OF AUBURN 2000—2035
,oo,000 —�
so,000 �
so,000 __ _ __ I
�o,000 -- -- — i
60,000 --- --
..; ;:.
50,000 ����
40,000 —- -- —
30,000 — — �` �
20,000 -
i o,000 — -
o �
2000 2010 2025 2035
ePopulation oHousing Units oJobs
1 —Population and housing data for 2000 and 2010 taken from US Census.
2—Population and housing projection for 2025 and 2035 from City of Auburn
3—Covered employment data and estimates derived from PSRC.
Clwph�r_'. Tbe Streel S7�.rle�ri Pnge�- 13
ORD.E Page 213 of 751
� �
�gTY�� � - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�� -��� :
, � 4vA5HIt�GTON
Tie,aFFrC Gaowni
The City of Auburn relies on traffic forecasts using the VISUM travel demand model, which is based
upon the land use plan and assumprions found in the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) household and ernployment foreeasts are also used. The model
is calibrated to include existing land uses and local knowledge,including large traffic generators such as
Boeing, the Outlet Collection, Emerald Downs,Muckleshoot Casino, and White River Amphitheater..
Areas outside of the current ciry limits that are expected to significandy impact the Ciry transportation
system are included in tlie model. The model enables the City to conduct traffic forecasts for aIl arterial
and collector streets based upon a number of if-then developmerit and land use scenarios.
The more dramaric traffic increases are often caused by development outside the City, especially along '
the roadways serving the Enumclaw Plateau. Other areas of major traffic increase include A Street SE,
M Street SE,and the West Valley Highway.
In order to address the growing traffie volumes and eongestion levels on city streets, traffic operations
were evaluated for a near term horizon year of 2022 and a long term horizon year of 2035. This
approach was taken to help identify which improvement projects need to be included in the
Transportation I.mprovement Program (TIP) to accommodate short term growth, vs. tliose longer
term projects which are needed to accommodate additional growth forecast to occur between 2022
and 2035.
FLTTCJ12.ii 2022 Ct.)NDITIC.�NS
City Projects
The current Transportarion Improvement Program, adopted during 2015, identifies programmed
projects for the years 2016 to 2021. Therefore, the analysis of 2022 traffic operations includes Ciry
projects which would increase capacity along both roadway seginents and at i.ntersections which are
anticipated to be constructed by 2022. The included projects are listed in Table 2-2 and illustrated on
Map 2-6. This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is not included in the travel demand
model: a new crossing of the BNSF Rail yard between SR-18 and 41st Street SE (TIP #12). 'This is
discussed in more detaIl in the Future System Recommendations section of this chapter and may be
included in future updates to this plan.
Regional Tra.nsportation Projects
In addiEion to tlie Ciry of Auburn projects id.entified above, a number of regional transportauon
projects are planned to be completed, preddminandy WSDOT projects planned for the freeway
system. However,none of these projects are anticipated to be completed by 2022.
Additional Projects
In addition to the projects identified in Map 2-6, four intersections outside of the Ciry were idenrified
as potential level-of-service concerns during the plan development. While the following intersecrions
liave not been analyzed in detail becau.se they are situated outside of Auburn's jurisdiction, they sliould
be evaluated by the appropria.te jurisdicrion and programmed for improvements as needed:
° 51 st Avenue S/S 316th Street (King County)
� S 321 st Street/46th Place(King County)
Cfiapter 2. L'he Street.Sy.vtena Page 2- 14
ORD.E Page 214 of 751
CITY Oi` * .""' x°�}
r� � Y- � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
..-.�.� , :
�- - W�►-�►h�T��
� S 321st Street/Peasley Canyon Road (King Counry)
� West Valley Hwy/Peasley Canyon Rd (WSDO`l�
As mitigation for an adjacent development project located within the Ciry of Auburn, the eastbound
stop-controlled S 316th Street approach to 51 st Avenue S is being widened to provide separate left-
and right-turn lanes. This improvement was required to mitigate a development related impact to LOS
at this intersection. The same development project also identified a traffic operations impact at the S
321 st Street intersection with 46th Place S. As mirigation for that impact the development deiiicated
ROW to the Ciry to allow the 46th Place S approach to S 321 st Street to be realigned to the east to
create two offset "T" intersecrions. This project is included in the Ciry of Auburn TIP (TIP #9) and
included in Table 2-2 below.
C{�n�ter 2. Zhe Street Syrtem Page 2- 1 S
ORD.E Page 215 of 751
�::
��TY�}F � • Comprehensive Transportation Plan
° � ;4���.�
�- w�srirh'GTa�v
Table 2-2. Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimates—2022
. • a e e a
0- e •
o • � o • '0 1 ♦ s
�e:- , � _ ,.
q� ,. �
City P�Qjects lncluded'��in the�2022.Analysis .� � ��� ������ ���� � '
. �
.
���
< � �,
, _ � . � � ��
� Auburn Way S Widen to 5-lanes, pedestrian
Dogwood St SE to Fir St SE improvements, and access control $1,739,163
2 1 Street NE Corridor Construct 5 lane arterial $6,763,892
45th St NE to S 277th St
3 S 277th Street Widen to 5 lanes total and. insfall a $g,293,101
AWN to Green River Bridge Class 1 trail
A Street NW Phase 2
4 W Main St to 3rd St NW Construct multi-lane arterial $3,150,000
F Street SE Add a c.enter turn lane and non- I
5 $2,457,620
4th St SE to Auburn Way S motorized improvements
M Street NE
6 E Main St to 4th St NE Widen to 4 lanes $1,525;000
7 8th Street NE Add EB lane to south side of 8th
Pike St NE to R St NE Street NE $1,450,000
8 49th Street NE Construct multi-lane arterial
Auburn Way N to I St NE connection $3,350,000
9 46th Place S Realignment. Realign 46th P-lace S to the east to
S 321sf St and 46th PI S create two new T intersections �825,000
124th Ave SE Corridor
10 SE 318fh St to SE 312th St W�den to 4 lanes and bike lanes $4;000,000
SE 320th Street
11 116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave Roundabout at 116th Avenue SE $4,644,100
SE and safety improvements
Auburn Way S Additional turn lanes and vehicle
12 Muckleshoot Plaza to storage, access control, and non- $2,892,550
Dogwood St SE motorized improvements.
C{�a�ter 2. The Street Sy.rtena Page 2- 16
ORD.E Page 216 of 751
� a�
������� # -� � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
; ,.� �����
- ���►-,►��-��N
�� ` . : . �� ,�� � , �. �,� �T.
•.�� � _ ,_�., . �
� ;
�C.it�Projects�.includec! �n the 2022 Analysis(Continued) �T~ _�� �� � � � ����
��
�.. , , :^��E�` � _ ��� ���� ���,-
� �
> � .u, �.. . � _ ;;'��
�.�. ..�.�� _. � .� .. ,, _ _ �, ,� �� �
W Valley Highway Roadway widening, re-
13 �mproyements channelization,.non-motorized $3,700;000
15th St NW to W Main St improvements and ITS upgrades
14 W Main Street Re-channelization,non=motorized
W Valley Hwy to Interurban Trail improvements, ITS upgrades $4,444,938
15 Auburn WayS Widen to 5=lanes;signa.lize $4,609,899
Fir St SE to Hemlock St SE Hemlock St SE
16 M Street SE Corridor Constru.ct mu.lti-lane corridor $6,675,000
8th St SE to Aubum Way S.
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ - -- -- --- -- - - __
Widen to 2 lanes each direction
Lea Hill Road Segment 1 including widening of the Green
17 $13�030;000
R St NE to 105th PI SE River Bridge. Includes bike lanes
and sidewalks.
18 Lea Hill Road Segment 2 Widen to 2 lanes each direction.
105th PI SE to 112th Ave SE Includes bike lanes and sidewalks. $12,000,000
19 Lea Hill Road $egment 3 Widen to 2 lanes each direction.
112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE Includes bike lanes and sidewalks. $4,000,000
20 W Valley Highway Re-channelization, non-motorized $3,100,0.00
SR-18 to 15th St SW improvements, ITS upgrades
R Street SE Construc.t a new roadway
21 17th St SE to M Sf SE connection $10,000;000
22 M Street SE at 12th $treet SE Install a new tra�c signal $625,000
23 M Street SE at 29th Street SE Insta.11 a new traffic signal $450,000
Cl�apter 2. The Street�yrtem Page 2- 17
ORD.E Page 217 of 751
�=�T����� = �=��� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.����F�
�.�.�--:_��..�:.:., �,vn�ri��craN
��� � -$ �_�'�`;,v t���"�nR ��.�"� �"ff'��.',P"�e ...� sTwa �, .' '���_���-�� „� ��, �" ; �� t`�'�n
Ci�y Frojecl�.incicrdecl�rn�tt���2i1�Analysi"s(Cantinu�ed� .a � k � ��: ���� ;x
' � ���.`�i��"����,� ����- "' � �
°
�
a,� ,�� �a �
= n_:.
�
A.�� r,� �— �_ � � s �
_ � �� ,� �n..�».,,...�.,� ����.,._� _
24 124th Avenue SE at SE 284th Safety and capacity improvements $700;OU0
Street
Lake Tapps Parkway
- __ _. _ _
25 Lakeland Hills Wy to E Valley � Add ITS system $1,005,000
Mwy
26 29th Street SE at R street SE Increase intersection capacity $1;800,000
___ _._ . _. _ _ _ _
Instap a traffic signal and
27 A Street SE at 37th Street SE southboun.d u-turn for futu�e $934,500
access management
28 I Street NE at 22nd Street NE Construct a new roundabout $1,425,000
z .. ,. _, ,. _ _ __.r_ _
ry . .�
� � _
��_
r �� _, � .t �� � -��
. ,. ,� � �3. � �.
< , . w =� � �� ���
�� ' � � ���� . � �� � � ��� � � �
� �� � ° ���� 'x �� ������ � Subtotal�for�City Projects �$tE�9,S89,763 ���'
�e
�4 �,�� _ �
_ � �._� ��,
- _ —�� V _ �.,����,. _ . �. _. �
. �� .� �
..a �_ ��� zw�
r____._._ __ _ � _.
� y � � _, . _. ��
- � � � - .. .. �..
� � �. , . �. � � ��, �:
PIon-City Projec�s included m the;2022sAnalysis ,� , . . , '.�
�;� .�� , d ; t�
��
51st Avenue
S 288th Street Add signal
2022 LEVELS OF SER{?CE
Weekday PM peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2022 conditions using the same
methodoiogy used to calculate the 2014 levels of service shown previously. The same corridors �vere
analyzed in both cases. The 2022 levels of service aecount for the growth forecast to occur between
2014 and 2022 and the capaciry improvement projects identified above. The 2022 levels of service are
shown in Table 2-3. Is should be noted that without the projects shown in Talile 2-2, the traffic
operations presented in Table 2-3 would be significandy worse, with additional comdors operating
below adopted LOS standards.
Chaf�ter 2. 7he.Street Sy.rtenr Page 2-;18
ORD.E Page 218 of 751
� .:,
«���� � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.�����.�
' WASN[NGTON
Table 2-3. Comidor LOS—Future 2022 Weekday PM Peak Hour
a
� a
e . . . . .. .
1 Auburn Wa N 15th St NE S 277th St D C D
'��. ..., Aiiliurr�Wa JN-= �':-� E�M�i_���.....�����'��isth;:St;NE,_��y,, ; �- E.., � ���,�pw ���,���}�,,�
�
3 Auburn Wa S � E Main St M St SE D C E
�4 .. �Aiiburn ViFa '°$. -� �lVlf�'��;3E ��° ,:�".,Acacle�ri :ear SE "�� . 13,��", `�C�.,. .�_ �t��
_....�. ._ _ ._ _ _ � �
5 M St/Harve Rd Aubum Wa N E Main St E D D
6�;�:M�S.tfH, � _ , �i.� � "Aubu ;Wa S w � ` �D�.>:
� � , �� � � -�, �:
_.a�e .�ts1���,...��.���'E'�����Ma� �. m��.._� h . ��� ..�.� � -.7�..
8 37th St NE/NW West Valle H Auburn Wa N D C C
_ _. _ __ __ __
�9 15th St:NE/NW� . �_.. k� ;W����il� ,,..{.. � Auburn3Wa x N�;..�� ����* ,. �.. p
< *
� ;v � . ' E ��D�' �
� .��w.,
� �. .,r,
10 Auburn AvelA St 6th St SE _ E Valle Access Rd _D__ __C _ _ ,, C__ __
..
�11�Main�St.,.. �.. ,,F s�. . _�I��l�i� � ,. �� R�'S� ;;:�� ��� p, � 3?�,
_._ � „� ,
,f� ,�.
_M� . < .. ........_ ,�.,
12 15th St SW West Valle H C St SW D D D
._ _
1��,:G'St�SW:`�� � � � " ;a° .�11�i� E���d �:�. '"��i�E$ � � ';��...��� ' ���`;:.. �B ...��,.. ;��,,.�'.:3'
..�
�14 West Valle H � � 37th St NE 15th St�NE E� B C
'1&� 'S'2Tltli�'St_ .,js.'.a.�,� � �i�a_._�� ��:d��.��L 5t NE. ` ..�_ "a. -,:,., �E. %..,,..�.G�� =� � ��.....�
,�� ��� z
16 R St SE/Kerse Wa Howard Rd Lake Ta s P D B C
:�1.7,� ;i:�ak�Ta,-Fe P.�.- `"... ,�`y � ,E�s��1►`$11e �__ .:v�`:�`,Kerse':Wa°'SE�_. ....:�,W_D... �
� �; � r��� ������
....,{
��,� ,1�.,� �,�� .���
78 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th Sf D C - B -
�19_�:8th,StNFJLea°Hill Rc!�:� .,��,��la rr�i e=F�ii, ,��„h.a���: �1>24th Ave:SE � '_:;_.En,�'�.�..,.�,�G_�� gF.�,����"'.
22 SE 31Zth St/132nd Ave SE. 124th Ave SE SR-18. _D _ _
B _ _ _ B___
`2s��T1,O5t�t�Pf S.FJSE_:320Eh�_S_��� '� ���� �;, - --_
�X._ w Lea H1I(`i�fi ���.. 1�4th Ave.5E� :--- ,—-- �y �� ' .�8�,� ���,���
2fi Lakeland Hills Wa SE Lake Ta s P A St SE D D D
_ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _
27,` ;29�i St.SElRive'waili'.Q�,.� s,. �.A;St�SEa:=_�.��� rt=�.Auburn�Wa S a_.` . . . ..r�. �D_ w������
_ � . �_
37 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Wa S E E E
�����41st St�SE/EilinM�sori>Rd.., ��k�5t�� �.'.:� m�C�St SE,...:.a . ' . E; �.�.,,r��F�.E �����``
35 West Valle H 15th St NW 15th St SW E D C
*Co.rridor segments within Downtoym Auburn may operate at L03 E in accordance with the Aubum Downtown Plan. All
other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better,unless otherwise indicated.
"*To4al travel time in fhe eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridorto meet I:OS standards:
As shown in the table, all of the evaluated corridors would meet LOS standards in 2022 with the
inclusion of the improvements identified above with the following exceptions:
e Southbound Auburn Way S befween E Main St and M St SE;
e Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW;and
e Westbound 41 st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW.
In order to be able to meet LOS standards on these corridor segments additional improvements
beyond those already included in this analys.is are required. A review of the segriient of Auburn Way S
between E Main St and M St SE shows that traffic operations through the SR-18 interchange and at
the intersection with M St SE cause the overall corridor segment to degrade to LOS E. The
interchange area is consuained by the e�sting SR-18 overpass, the configurarion of the SR-18 on- and
off-ramps, and the close spacing of the ramp intersections which provide limited vehicle storage. As a
result the ability to increase capacity along this section of the corridor is limited. It is possible that the
construction of the new eastbound off-ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot
Casino could draw traffic away from this area; however the scope of this projeet has not yet been
Cba�ter2:Tbe Street Sy.rtem Page 2- 19
ORD.E Page 219 of 751
� ;.�
�����f �- =a Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�������
�� �,
� V�/ASF[IM1iGTON �
determined so it was not accounted for in this analysis. It may also be appropriate, as with certain
other corridor sections, for the City to consider chariging the LOS standard for this corridor to reflect
that the e�cisting corridor is built-out and further improvements are neither desirable nor cost effective.
Similar circumstances ex_ist for Corridor #33, 41 st Street SE/Ellingson Road. This eorridor is forecast
to operate at LOS F in both the eastbound and westbound directions in 2022. This corridor is
constrained by the BNSF bridge, the close spacing of the C Street SW and A Street SE signalized
intersections, and the limited storage space between the two intersections. Providing additional
capacity would likely require the BNSF bridge to be reconstructed, an expensive proposition, with a
limited increase in capacity. It is possible that otlier capaciry projects may reduce traffie volumes on
this by constructing additional capaciry on alternate routes. These include the crossing of the BNSF
railyard to the north which would provide another east-west connecrion across southern Auburn,and
the completion of the improvements to Stewart Road to the south, including the replacement of the
White Riyer bridge, which would provide additional capaciry between SR-167 and the Lakela.nd Hills
area. The BNSF railyard crossing project 'is iricluded as projeet #12 in the TIP, however construction
is shown beyond 2021, so this.project was not included in the analysis of 2022 conditions. Completion
of the SEewart Road capacity improvements are being planned by the. Cities of Sumner and Pacific.
The City of Auburn supports these improvements, and has programmed the project in the TIP as
project#73; which will provide the Ciry of Pacifc with some funds to support construction of their
portion of the project. Construcrion of these improvements is nor anricipated until beyond 2022, so
this was not accounted for in this analysis. Another potential oprion could be to revise the LOS
standard for this corridor to reflect that the e�usring corridor is built-out and further improvements
may not be eost effective.
The transportation system can be compared to a three legged stool in terms of the improvement
strategies which are available to reduce corigestion.The three options are to eonstruct irnprovements
to add capaciry, make better use of the e�sting infrastructure which is available; and to manage
demand. The analysis presented above accounts for the construction of additional capacity, and
making better use of the available capacity through expansion of ITS infrastructure and the
optimization of signal timing. The analysis does not aceount for deina..nd management strategies which.
could result in improvements to traffic operations through the use of such things as:
• Road Pricing (Tollin�
a Parking Management and Parking Pricing
• Car Sharing
• Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance
o Ridesharing and HOV Lanes
o Transit Incentives
• Transit and non-motorized Improvements
• Telecommute,compressed work week,off=peak schedule
Many of these solutions have been implemented at the state level, with additional consideration being
given to expanding the options which are currendy in use,
Dec'isions need to be made regarding how these three potential congestion management tools are
balanced to provide the most cost effective solutions. It is unlikely that the City will be able to
Cba�ter 2. 1 be Street Sy.rtem Page 2-20
ORD:E Page 220 of 751
�E���� ��� �=u� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
������
,�' �" WASHfiPvGTflN
implement all of the capaciry projects documented above by 2022 due to the cost of the project
portfolio being in excess of available fundirig. Therefore; the foeus should be on the most cost
effective projects whieh reduce congestion at locations where it is a recurrent problem, and 'improving
the efficiency of the existing system. Transportation system management and transportation demand
management are included in the future system recommendarions section at the end of this chapter.
PUTURF..2035 CONI)ITIONS
Ciry Projects
In addirion to the projects identified above which were included in the 2022 analysis, a number of
additional projects were included in the analysis of 2035 conditions. These additional projects include
those which are included in the TIP but which are not anticipated to be constructed until beyond 2022,
and the longer term projects included in the previous Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The
included projects are listed iri Table 2-4 and illustrated on Map 2-6.
This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is not included in tlle model: the crossing of the
BNSF Rail yard. This is discussed in more detail in the Future System Recommendations section of
this chapter and will likely b.e included in future model runs and updates to this plan..
Regional Transpqrtation Projects
In addirion to the Ciry of Auburn projects idenrified above, a number of regional transportation
projects were included in the development of the forecast volumes. These are predominantly WSDOT
projects planned for the freeway system. Table 2-4 summarizes the included ,projects, along with
planning level cost estimates.
Additional Projects
Anotlier future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addirion of the Auburn Bypass
connecting SR-18 to SR-164. A draft Bypasf Fea.ribility Ae�ort (September 2009) was prepared 'in
partnership with WSDOT, the City of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional
parmers.While a preferred alternative for the bypass has not yet been developed,the Washington State
Legislature in¢luded funding iri the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of this
new connection. It is anticipated that the new roadway will include an eastbound off-ramp from SR-18
_ _
to SR-164 in the viciniry of the Muckleshoot Casino, no addirional details regarding the project have
been determiried. Therefore, this was not aceounted for in the traffic forecasts. T'he impacts of this
project will be identified.and mitigated as part of the process to determine the ultimate alignment.The
project will be included in future updates of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
Cfiaf�ter 2. The Street Sy.rtem Page 2-21
ORD.E Page 221 of 751
� _:
CETY UF .
n� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�����L�
,_ "n` �'�`AS H T fv�Ci'I'C)t�l
Table 2-4. Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimate.s,-2035
. � • + a e
�' • •
• a s • • :o I oe
. ������4�=��'� �����" �� �,, '�'=f-m ` �' �:` "�...-� .
.��[�r��ai C��.Pro�ec�s 1r�clutled�n#he 2t�3�r�1�n�t�jt�is �= ��
� � � � ��� �.
�� � . � `�
��a,.. . ..... . i �.��,�.._� .-� v:.. , ������... .,.� � � �� � �
- - -----_
VViden road to twb lanes each
dicectiqn plus a center twq-
SR-164 way lefttum lane. Upgrade
29 Hemloek St SE to A.cademy Dr the intersection ofiAuburn $61,000,000
SE Way South and Dogwood
Street to accomrnodate
_ _...__ _ __ _
Bypass traffic.
R Street Bypass
30 M St SE to SR-18 Construct a new bypass road $6,200,000
Add NB righf turn lane, EB
S 312th Street right turn lane,WB IefC turn
31 lane, and sign.al; Provide $1,720,000
112th Avenue SE sidewalks and bike lanes on
all legs.
SE 304th Street Add signal and NB left turn
32 lane. Include sidewalks and $1,300,000 '
112th Avenue SE bike lanes 6oth sides.
_ _-- . . -- - - _
Construct 500`secfion f�om
_.. .
SE 320th to SE 318th Way
GRC.0 Jmprovements at 124th W�th three SB lanes and one
33 Ave SE NB lane, The southbound
lanes w.ill be two leff furn into $510,000
SE 318th St to SE 320th St GRCC and one right furn
onto SE 320th. Bike lanes
and sidewalks included.
Add one-way(EB)road with
A Street Loop unsignalized free right turn at
34 A StreetSE. Include $1,700,000
A St SW to A St SE sidewalks both sides of new
_ _ . . ._ _ ._ . ..
road.
_. __ _. _ - .
Coordinate signals at A and
C Street together.:At A
A Street SEIC Street SW Street, add additional V1/B
35 through lane;At C Street, $1,500,000
Ellingson Road restripe to allow SB left tum '
lane. Include sidewalks on all
legs of both `i.ntersections.
Cf�g�ter 2. The Street Sy.rtem � � P�xe p_22
ORD.E Page 222 of 751
.. ,
������F - � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.��
`_�- ;�"� wAS Ft t t�'Gl`t7P+1
�"i�'� T I it�C��7�...�. � ,� < a" � � �" �� .� r f Ei i� t�
F ,�.
� � � ,� � ( _ �` � 37 i -
� 1 �t� + � (,
� ,�"�'' � , ? .'� ` �_ e�.., "�� E��
Construct new
collecfo�linking
284th Street af 124th
SE 284th/SE 288th St Ave.to 288th Street
36 $7,70.0,000
124th Ave SE#0 132nd Ave SE at 132nd Ave. Raad
will be one lane each
- _
direction with b'ike
lanes and sidewalks.
Provide protecfed
S6 left tum phase
37 51st Avenue and signal and SB
S 296fh S left turn lane; Inc.lude $1,400,000
bike lanes and
sidewalks on all legs
Realign/improve
radius at doglegs
(SE 281st St)for
safefy;and.,realign
i ntersecti n g:streets
to improve site
108th Avenuel112th Avenue distances. Widen to
38 SE 4 lanes north of $7;700,000
S 277th St to S 286th St 284th Street.At
286th Street,widen
to allow for turn
pockets, Inelude bike
lanes and sidewalk
both sides of -
108th/112th Ave SE.
�" {¢€ �':+� �� a €` ��1� � � 7 1 E '��, 3 .... � � �
3 � �^ �»
f�.��¢ 3 ,� x ��� ��s` � �� ��i 4+�� r 3 l�al � ... � A�..,
� v..�.:� � .� .�
3� -�, � � � p `�€ �. � .�..� 1'" � �� � .3����,�. �� aa. �' �����.
., �' . A'.. ,
—�.,,..�. .— ..a.. .... �... �.»I _.. ..,.��..,n _.. .�.. .....a..,� .....,-., . . ,.��' .„ _.. ...,� : . .�.. r. ��:3� ,.,
' . " `" `�3'�". �..��1� i ��,, ��� ;Lr^P '�;'
. ,., y.'";� �, i �. pr
�
r � � ..
.,....�� �.�>•,s s w�� �r�� . "'� . '', a.::... u . ....f<... � .�.�
39 BPVSF Yard Grade Separation Construct road $32,125,000
TBD across BNSF yard
Construct an Auburn
Auburn Way S Bypass Way S Bypass
40 Riverwalk Dr to SR-18 at R St between Riverwalk $60,450;000
SE pr and R St SE with
new connection to
SR-18atRStSE
C�ia�ter2: The SCreet J y.rtem Page 2-23
QRD.E Page 223 of 751
�[TY��� -�- �= Comprehensive Transportation Plan
__; ������
�-��"� WASHiNGTQN
�.; �, � ; _
Non-City Projects included in the 2035 Analys[s:; �_ � "
� �� .- � ��
_
�. ,
t� _ d . �a,a�. �, . ._.
� . __ � � 3������� z
..
_ . , �w ,� �. �.�. �e
From 1-405 to SR-18, add one NB and one SB general
purpose lane; From SR-18 to SR-161;add one NB HOT
SR-167 lane and one SB HOT lane;Add direct NB/SB MOV/FiOT
lane connection ramps between SR-167& I-405;Add NB
1-405 to SR-509 and SB auxiliary lanes between I-4Q5 and S 180th Street;
Add NB and SB a.uxil.iary lanes between SR-516 antl S
277th Street; Extend SR-167 from SR-161 fo SR-509.
Complete ramp from EB SR-18 to SB SR-167 and
SR-18 at SR-167 eliminate SR-18 accessfrom West Valley Mighway near
Feasley Canyon.
SR-167
15ttr Street NW to 8th Street E.
Add HQV lane each direction
Stewart Road Widen to 2 lanes each direction and center tum lane in
SR-167 to East Valley Highway the Cities of Sumnerand Pacific. Includes widening of the
White River bridge,
2035L�[sOFSERvzCE ,
Weekday PM peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2035 condiEions using the same
metl�odology used to calculate both tlie 2014 and 2022 levels of service. The 2035 levels of service
account for the growth forecast to occur by 2035 and the capacity improvement projects identified
above. The 2035 levels of service are shown in Table 2-5. As shown in the table, all of the evaluated
corridors would meet LOS standards in 2035 with the inclusion of the improvements idenrified above
with the followirig exceprions:
e Southbound Auburn Way N between S 277th St and 15th St NE;
e Southbound Auburn Way S between E Nlain St and M St SE; i
a Northbound M St between E Main St and Auburn Way S; '
• Eastbound 37th St between W Valley Hwy and Auburn Way N;
o Westbound 15th St SW between W Valley Hwy and A St SE;
m Southbound Lakeland Hill Way SE between Lake Tapps Pkwy and A St SE;
o Eastbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S; .
• Westbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S; and
o Westbound 41 st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE.
The additional traffic anticipated by 2035 is expected to degrade a number of additional corridors
below adopted level of service standards relative to the analysis of 2022 condit'tons.
Cba�ter-2. I he Street J y.rtem Page 2-24
ORD:E Page 224 of 751
��.� - � -
���� ��� =�%• Comprehensive Transportation Plan
���� A��
�� �
�� WASH[NGTON
There are two locations where corridors would operate at improvement levels of service in 2035
relative to 2022 conditions:
e Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE,which would improve from LOS F to
LOS E, the result of the improvements identified above, combined with the planned
improvements to the Stewart Road corridor and SR-167 which would attract traffic currendy
using the 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road corridor to access A Street/East Valley Highway to
the south.
• Southbound West Valley High�vay between 15th Street NW and 15th Street S.W,whieh would
improve from LOS D eo LOS C. This is also likely due to improvements to SR-167, which
would reduce the use of West Valley Highway as a parallel bypass route..
Table 2-5. Comdor Levels of Serqice -Future 2035 Weekday PM Peak Hour
s
� s
� . .. . . .. .
1 Auburn Wa N 15th St NE S 277th St D D E
aZ��. :�..�.rn;Wa .N,;.'; `� �� ��141ain St:`"�� ;'.���1`StFii�$t�:NE";.. , . d' �..f�;�E .:" .,.�i. � _µ��ti.��
�- , .r ,:. �� � .. E
3 Auburn Wa S E Main St M St SE D C F
.4��1�bum�:ilNa .S' _� ��:����(V��S#°SE:'i� u���Academ �D�SE �
�.�.., . .
�. �
� � �; �� ,._
_. �����
,.� w. 4 ,g� �.._�_� _..� ��.,�
5 M St/Harve Rd Auburn Wa N E Main St E D E
� .� � — �� —
�_ -�� � � Y
� �;���E ��� _.��Autitt�e.Wa S� : __�w�t3�# .,,:
F �, � �
��,_�� �3�.�E�n�_St:' �.��- r�.��t��',
�':�8�>,..� �,�[E/NW „�,� �E., ���st Valle.H... � �tukrurn Wa. �N .��.� ��_ .��3��� . ���.,.����" .
,,. �.��_ w,.�.�.�. _ .. .._ .�.,�� .__.... . . . . � ..r
8 15th St NEINW West Valle H Auburn Wa N F'"'* E E
_ __ __ _ __ - _
� ., s.,
''�.10 ,x� ;�,�_. Aw+�t/!C`�St�s.,. ���8th.St"'.SE�„. .��:;�� . e�' 'Acce'S�Rd� � ��.`�I `�`, �'�G�, , `
_ ,, ..3
11 Main St West Valle H R;St D D D
`.'f�� �t� �#.SW�'���� �' . �Ylterst:Valle "'�. �����f.SW.�::3� :�-� ,�� � �::
��� �� ' _�?�_�'-, :_,_�� .. ��..,.�,,:
,�, _ - ,_ . _ �.. _.. .� .�
13 C St SW Ellin son Rd SR-18 D C D
14�1Ai�Y.aife �H._ F u�.�_�,; �'�th%St .NE, �..Y���#�t��St�.NE:� -��.:���-� �� - � �
�.,, ����,���.�,� _B�'�`� �
� _ . t a �.,._ . : _._.e_ .�_
15 S 277th St Fronta e Rd L Sf NE E E C
fi1,, �� �1Kers� Ws _.,��.wq. �Howa,rd:Rc!_...������`�7a e:`�P ������.,�� �B� C�..�
__. �._. _ __��. __. , � �
17 Lake Ta s P East Valle H Kerse Wa SE D C C
. � �.
��.'�8'a`� ';��. .'� . �.5��l� „��� m.. ��a�'�� ' � ,�`th�t� �` �'�" G.. �.,�� f
.,...�....� �. . . _.,_�� � _��.., n _..., ��. . .
19 8th St IdE/Lea Hill Rd Harve Rd 124th Ave SE E C B
: ��.���._� v.2th SU132nd_/k'��:. .,.,..��th Av,.e.SE:��...;. ��R..�$ � .._,.,_.� .. ' �3 �� _, �
.,�.,�...��. �� �E.B�....
�. .. .��. e...__.6_w ,�.
25 105th PI SEISE 320th Sf Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE - D C C
„26�, T��and HiI1s�Wa �SE.a:'',��Lake Ta :s P ;.-��A:�StteS�.,._. �� � �
.3E
F �
� s 4 . e,. N,d�����.a --., t?,� ���E ���
27 29th St SE/Riverwatk Dr A St SE Auburn Wa S D C C
�i `� e�S��SNt�Cross St � -=`�G�St� � .��, ,�,�AuburrisWa�S r,.�.��,„;�E_�.m. `.. � 4F __���,� �'�.N�
_�`� _ �._ ��_ __. ,,�, �._ �• ,. ��,��.m�
33 41st:St SElEllin son Rd A St SE C St.SE E E F
�.3.5,�3 1��aite _H.. ' �`.....,,tt°' '���$t�NW,�. �-�.�'�5�k1%:i!SIlV� �.�`m.a.. ._._N � �g�
�_ �..
�� m. � � . . �� . �..T.� .��...t� .� .���.�
"Corrido�segments within Downtown Aubum may operate at LOS E in accordance witFi the Auburn Downtovvn Plan.All�
other arterial and collector corrldors must operate at LOS D or betfer,unless ofhervvise indicated.
'*Total traveF time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 7,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards.
In order to be able to meet LOS standards on these corridor segments additional improvements
beyond those already ineluded in this analysis may be required.. However, it may not be cost effecrive
to construct the addirional c.apaciry needed along all of these corridor segments. However, it may be
Cha�ter 2. The Street Sy.cterr� Page 2-25
ORD�E Page 225 of751
���Y��� ���=� : Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� �:����
�- 4VASMINGTC7N
possible to improve traffie operations at key intersections along these corridors to reduce congestion.
However, these improvements may not be sufficient to improve operations to below adopted LOS
standards.
The Ciry, and the broader region, will need to identify strategies and adopt policies, including
transportation demand management, transportation system management; and public-private
partnerships, to be able to manage congestion while
reaching projected growth targets. , �.., ,,,, .,. _
� � ,. �
£UTtJ K:i� SYST.I:M .K.IsC(��i.iVII:NDATIC�NS -
Ft7'I'lJRF:STRF.E'T Ii41PRQVFAiF...NTS � • ` �.
The proposed future street plan consists of a
�� � ��"��i� #;��
combination of city street and regional �. �
.. . . . g . .�. +�d T`«��
transportat�on improvements, described in Table 2- _�� �� �� a
. _ . . . . ���y� , e u ss s.�r.. ,,.... �4�r .�" ,:
3 and shown in Map 2=6. The City cannot �},, ..r;�� _ ��;�a.� � ���.�,� ` , ��3 =�
adequately solve traffic congesrion by making Ciry West Main Street; Downtown Auburn
street improvements alone. Partnerships with
WSDOT, King and Pierce Counaes, and other
agencies are essenual to implementing the future
street system in Aubum. The following actions are proposedc
1. Implement street projects prioritized in the City's TIP and CFP;
2. Program and seek a.dditional funding for street capacity projects not currendy idenrified in the TIP
and GFP;
3. Work collaboratively with WSDOT and other partner agencies to implement roadway
improvements to the regional highway network;and
4. Work to implement TSM,TDM a.nd non-motorized improvements.
DOWNTOWN CIRCUL4TION PLAN
Auburn's Downtown is undergoirig considerable growth and transition to a higher densiry, mixed-use
town center. Major redevelopmerit, including the Trek Building and Merrill Garderis mixed-use
projects is occurring to the south of Main Street.
The transformation of downtown Auburn will include many changes to the publie right-of-way and
streetscape. The Do�ntoum Cireulatzon Plan will accommodate the many types of travelers that will be
using downtown streets including pedestrians, bicyc,lists, transit users, truck operators, and personal
vehicle users.An improved pedestrian and bicycle environment will need to be designed into the fabric
of downtown Auburn. At the same time, there are several major north-south corridors which traverse
the downtown, so accommodation for high traffic volumes and the potential repercussions of
modifying the existing street system will need to be considerecl in the developmen.t of the Doivntosvn
Circulatzon Plan.
Cf�a�ter 2. 1 he Street Sy.rtenz Page 2-26
ORD:E Page,226 of 751
�.q<� -
��rY�l �-� ��:• Comprehensive Transportation Plan
_ � *�
�'°� -''�"'� WASH[NGTON
E/WIRONMENTAL PARK DISTRICT
In the vicinity of the Environmental Park, to the west of downtown Auburn, the City is evaluating the
use of low impact roads and projects that add sidewalks, trails, and additional connectiviry between
Clay Street,and Western Avenue. This area will be examined in more detail for transportation
improvements as the eoneept for the Environmental Park District is further refined.;
41STSTREETSE/ELLINGSON ROAD BETWEENA S`rSEAND CSTSW
The area around.41 st Street SE/Ellingson Road beriveen A Street SE and C Street SW continues to be
a bottleneck for Auburn drivers,especially with additional development in the Lakeland Hills PUD and
the Pierce County cities to the south. The close spacing of these two intersecrions, coupled with Ehe
numerous business and residential accesses in the area warrant a more in depth study of the area.This
study will likely also include the enrire A Street SE and C Street SW corridors; and an evaluarion of tlie
BNSF rail yard crossing projects d:iscussed below.
BNSFRAIL YARD CROSSING
The Ciry has identified the need for a new east/west grade separated crossing of the BNSF rail yard
between C Street SW and A Street NE.
There are a variery of criteria that the Ciry will consider to dete.rmine the alignment of the crossing,
including potential deyelopment of the BNSF property as a multi-modal rail yard, commercial
development on Auburn Way S and A Street SE, re-development of the GSA property, funding
feasibiliry, neighborhood impacts, transportarion impacts, and engineering feasibility. The crossing
project was not accounted for in the 2035 traffic model. Therefore, it is difficult to acces.s the speci.fic
impaets of the crossing projec.t, However,it is anticipated that the project could significandy improve
east-west mobility in southern Auburn, relieving the e�cisring bottlenecks at 3rd Street SE and 41st
Street SE,by providing an additional alternarive for the residential neighborhoods to the east of the rail
yard to connect with the commercial and retail land-u.ses and SR-167 to the west of the yard. One
potential impact of the crossing project, depending on the alignmerit selected, could be an increase in
traffie through the Terminal Park neighborhood.
AuBuiziv BrPass
Another future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addition of the Auburn Bypass
connecting SR-1$ to SR-164. A draft Bypdss Fea.ribility Re�iort (September 2009) was prepared iri
partnership with WSDOT, the Ciry of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional
parmers. While a preferred alternarive for the bypass has not yet been developed, the Washington State
Legislature included funcling in the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of a
portion of this new connecriori. It is anricipated that the new roadway will inelude an eastbourid off-
ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the viciniry of the Muckleshoot Casino, no additional details regarding
the project have been determined. Therefore, this was not accounted for in the traffic forecasts. 'I`he
impacts of this project will be idenrified and mirigated as part of the process to determine the ultimate
alignment.The project will be included in future updates of the Comprehensive Transportarion Plan.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTENn MANAGEnl1ENT
Transportation system management (TSl� techniques, which make more efficient use of the existing
transportation facilities, can reduce the need for costly system capacity expansion projects. These
C{iaj�ter 2. The Street Sy.ctem Page 2-27
ORD.E Page 227 of 751
������� - � � ���- Comprehen�s�ive Transportation Plan
.�������.�
;�=,:�_�-= �vnst�thc�t��
techniques ean also be used to im.prove LOS when travel corridors reach adopted LOS standards.
TSM techniques used by the Ciry inclucle:
■ Re-channelization/reseriping, adding turn lanes� adding/increasing number of through lanes;
■ Signal interconnect and optimization;
° Turn movement restrictions;
� Aceess Managemerit;and
° Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS);
The Ciry w'ill continue to use these TSM techniques to ma�mize the efficiency of the e�sting street
network. Of the various TSM strategies available, the City continues to invest in and expand its ITS
infrastructure as a cost effeetive means of increasing system capacity. The ITS system enables the Ciry
to change traffic signals in real-eime, thereby accommodating unexpected increases in traffic or traffic
obstacles such as event related traffic and collisions. For eXample, ITS has proven to be a useful tool in
helping to manage the impact of event traffic traveling south on Auburn Way South, often during tlie
PM peak, to the White River Amphitheatre. The Ciry will continue to roll out ITS capabiliries on
corridors around the City, as referenced in Map 2-7 and detailed in the ITS policies included in
Chapter 5.
In addition to TSM strategies, the Ciry strives to provide viable alternatives for travelers, to ensure ,
freedom of choice among several transportation modes, including transit, biking and walking as
alternatives to the automobile. The Ciry vyill prioritize the development of pedestrian-friendly
environments such as bicycle routes and pedestrian paths as the non-motori.zed system expands.
TRANSP4RTAT10M DEMAND MANAGEM�NT
Reducing corigesrion includes strategies to reduce demands on the transportation system. T'he State of
Washington emphasized the importance of transportation demand management (TDl� by adopting a
Commute Trip Reducuon law. That law requires all major employers, with over 100 employees
arriving between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 AM, to develop programs and strategies to reduce the
number of commuter automobile trips made by their employees. Transportation demand management
reduces demand on the street system. While TDM and TSM employ a different suite of strategies, they
share many of the sarrie benefits. Both increase the efficiency of tlie transportation system, reduce the
need for costly capaciry expansions, help improve LOS, and contribute to an enhanced qual'try of life
for those who use and benefit from the transportation system. TDM strategies include;
° ride-sharing through vanpools and carpools;
° preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles;
� car sharing programs;
° transit use incenrives�
" parking management to discourage single occupant vehicle (SO� travel;
° teleeommuting;
■ alternative work schedules to compress the work week or shift the commute out"side the rypical
commute hours;and
� urban design encouraging non-motorized travel through design features.
C{�a�ter 2. l he Street Sy.ctem Pag"e 2-28
ORD.E Page 228 of 751
CITY Oi w.': e„£3a��, P.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
������ �
•�� �' wnsxtn�c�ro�v
��
The City of Auburn will conrinue to encourage drivers of single occupancy vehicles to consider
alternate modes of travel such as carpools, vanpools, transit, non-motorized travel, and alternative
work sehedules.
STREET MP►INTENANCE & REHABILITATION
The Ciry is responsible for maintaining the physical structure of the roadway system. However,
pavement maintenance is expensive, and adequate funding is generally not available. Recognizing this
dilemma, Auburn residents approved Proposiuon 1., the "Save Our Streets" (SOS) Program; in
November 2004. The SOS program created a dedicated local street fund for repair, rehabilitation, and
maintenance of local roadways from property tax revenues. In 2013, after the original programs tax
increases ended,the Ciry Council modified the funding source for this program to be from sales tax on
construetion.
The Ciry has ere.ated a similar program to fund the repair and maintenanee of arterials and eollector
streets. The program is funded through a one percent utiliry tax. While the available funding through
this program is limited, which makes prioritizing projects challenging, the City has been able to
maximize the value of the available funds by using them to leverage grant funds, enabling significandy
more arterial and eollector street repair and maintenance to be completed.
fi���� �� r
�n�.. � �
_
,' °`,' ,.
�..;,,
__ ., , �� r ,
� � � ��i�,j� f;
�
6 '$�� r
-`...�._¢� � . '.I
. _ ..�. , :W=.� : I
FSF
,�. _a
M �
:.. �.e �m. �. '�<
f}y
Pry
s�. �}
2.�.,,...��'n�,r^�.
M�..A.
2..«.viiz"i�:��.
Local Residential Street Before SOS Rebuild Local Residential Street After SOS Rebuild
NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS
Transportauon systems and faciliries can impact adjacent neighborhoods. Potential 'impacts result from
increased traffic resulting from drivers seeking alternate routes to congested arterials; in an effort to
save time. These impacts can include higher vehicle speeds resulting in potential safery concerns, and
associated air and noise pollution. Neighborhoods throughout the Ciry are concerned with these traffic
impacts and want to discourage cut-through traffic.
City policies discourage through traffic in neighborlioods.The Ciry also has a traffic calming prograiim
that addresses the pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile traffic safety concerns that 'impact
neighborhoods. The traff c calming program is a community-based program with the goal of
identifying potential problems and development of solutions to help mitigate these impacts. The
C{�a�ter 2. The Street Sy.rtem Page 2-29
ORD.E Page 229 of 751
,� ` � •
��TY�}F - �r = Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��:����
"�� � � 1NA�HfNU'TON
, �_.
program raises public awareness of traffic safety issues and ways that people can help minimize traffic
problems in their own neighborhoods.
INTERGOVERNMENT/�L C40RDINATIOtV
The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070) provides that comprehensive plans should include a
discussion of intergovernmental coordination efforts, including "an assessment of the impacts of the
transportarion plan and land use assumprions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions:"
Auburn works closely with neighboring cities, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and state and regional
agencies to ensure coordinated efforts are made in developing all modes of the transportation system.
Cfiaf�ter 2. I he SCreet Sy.rtenr Pqge 2-30
ORD.E Page 230 of 751
.�..
J, �
�,
�
� .-
-- '
� �
! �
� P
• 0
i � 4 5
■ —
/
, 2 �1 _
S T �
T
�67 � ��
� '_r_' �j �
,:� �
I JI �� , �� SE
�
� — ~ - I —.`�
_1.'
Q—
1
� �� � � �$ �
S S� _- � =
,�� „ �� �,J�
�e� z
� �.ryi.
4Zk T-3W-
is r---
�
� \�, —k e �
�:
'G �
— .......""'•
I
_ - � �
�
2 T E
.�� �
26
r �
1
3, CKaiLUG �'����� ..
ti
�'��-, �
�6�
i� � �� �\
� � �
i5 � w
j _�` � \
� � i � �
I ' 2N9S7
Cpi
I �]',/( /
/ I �`'i11�V E
� 6Q ✓ �
1
� �,��,, S J�
�1
r� ���yo�a�o�m ,•y FutureMinorntterlal p.,• F���.���Re„d�,«a���a Aubum Transportation Plan
Functional Roadway Classification
N Mighway �v Pcslaential Collettar N IWral Cdleam
0 1 ��.,�'" pnn[ipat Artenal ��i�� Future 2esldenHal Colltt[w / v Lacal
Miles
/v hVnorArtenal N NonReziEentialCollectar . „ Ptiva[c Map 2-1
ORD.E Pa e 231 of 751
:
.�'.
,T
� TI I CT
�
I ( y�—�
��
I — �P
S 287TH ST ' 1 � 42ND S I 43RD 5T NE S 286TH 5T -
� I '
SEZ90TH
5 292N�ST _ Q-�
`'-� �p SE 293R�ST
rp N
� � ,
a �; �
r I G7 `-'
� �- a' s
9TN ST
N -
> ' �
I ¢ -
S 3RD Pl w
z � � � /�e- �— - �, - j'
� �
� il i � w � � a (
' � �
2�gT 5T NE.
�� SE 3'IOTH 5T �
3 � �
� = w j
� _ _
i� � � ( �
Z �
� � SE3�6�
�21SLSI-� � ��� � �
,omm • i-� �
� S 324TH ST — , ` 4TH T NE � SE 323RD PL � I 8�
0
C� � � ��
�
3� ,_ Y
[y � W
� y
d F
�y� I l 47H ST SW `�
— >
IS
�i H sr se
_ _�
. . � .. I vi SCf
�, �%o
— —, " ` 5z sE - s
�n j1YH �n
r
y
w 22NDSTSE� �
� �
o �
� i �;
�� � 25TH� I W � %�7HST5E �
�
r 1 F My�Rs �
� � ��! E 1
�5T 5T
STUCK RIVER DR SE
r �57N W PY S
N
� ���jE
5�
A�
�� �
Q I
I� � y
�� ! �1
� � I
Q�h ST SE �
w \
�
>
¢
w � \
y w
r
_ a O
I
¢
`' a
2ND ST E P
���
ba`N Sj SE T N ST SE —
I<
m 6,�N5 SE ,
�
� ST S
� Parks 700-999 Auburn Transportation Plan
Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2013)
0 1 � Cityo(Aubum 1,000-9,999
LJ
Miles
—io.000. Map 2-2
ORD.E Pa e 232 of 751
:
,
..� ..
,
,,,r�"
-------- �
Z SOTN ST Ntl
� yW�
J�(/ �-�SL_.
� �NP
� 5 287TH ST � -N1 4 O ST N W 42ND ST NE SE 2867H ST �
__� � I
w ��—
`SE290TH ST w
S 292N�ST Z =� Q
r h0 S�, ❑
y �
� 2 �ySrH S7 u�i
F ��;
�O
n
� SE 299TH ST
.. ��.il ii PJ J
5 305TH ST � ��� �� � ��' Z �a4'�� m 3 � TH ST w /)
~ o � y I
q I I � � > �
n —.� ���� � � �, a se so7rH p� a
� � F �
N �o"
J � � C�
W
r � 'sr �`�� z c' se a�zrH sr
�
� � y ��
z �
N ■ SE 316TH� �
3 �,
�-- � ■ . gT NE r � y SE 320TH ST
m9 2 � � • Q
� S 924TH 5T ti , w . r � SE 323RD PL � �$ �
� � o
m i-
�
� � W MAIN O
5T E MAIN ST
2N�ST
4THSTSW 4THSTSE
� �3j� oma�B
BTH ST
�KDIAMOND R¢.SE�
I
r ' SCFN/e
�
'_ . � m ems� ,7 SS SE _ �N
w TH �n
/ ~ `�
�
� �r 22ND 5T SE r
w �� � 25TH 5� `� \
m �y � � iTH ST SE
t- F ¢ ti �
N U
� � �I 29TH ST SE > ,
32ND ST S
STUCK RNER�R SE
N 36TN`'S5 �c75iN`NPYS
�
o�p�,e.emv�► t
��� �
e"
� o
�_�;��
� l�'' �,c � °jrh sr sE
� o �Rs � \
Fy w
�y a
� YSe � W \
� � �
> O
�fH ST SE � LL
�� <9 �
5
� �Z� 2ND ST E P a I
< _
Ir � II
�� � 62ND ST SE
� 64iHS15E N I
Im m
_ �
!
73 ST 5
Vrlo�IlY 1 P�Io�I�Y 1 � W{p01
O N N Auburn Transportation Plan
c�r�m<<o�ein.rxna�cP: wrremm�.nr��xnome
+ ,,,,, Truck Routes
eo ���,�,e�o�a�„��w wo�,.
�«M� Nwre loul Tmd Pau¢ '
O '� � OqolnWmn
NC��renti�mu6�TucFPoule ��
Miles .«N� F����e7nro�ynr.��wn��cP
ORD.E Pa e 233 of 751 Map 2-3
:
.�.
,T.
I ^ W 50TN ST NE
� �� � �
� P
� t�
�: y
��� -� 4 �STNW 42NDSTNE S 286THST
�
I�� `SE Z9oTH
5 292ND 5T I w Q'�
� I �Iv�i ��2 SF
� - 2� �9STH T ti
� Oo
F l67 2
�, or sE ssrH sr
� �
�I PJ
0. �
S 305TH ST 3 ' �� 1 z p-C� SE H 5T w
N
ti � � � M w w
y � W Q >
� .: �, � F SE 3077 L Z
� w � r
m .- m
N � � z e'
�
r
K t�
ti
Z Z O
N SE 376TM ST
3
`- — 8TH � SE 320TH ST
w
g
>
�9� 5 324TH ST ,�� ti w � 9E 329RD Pl � �8
v! � o
� m �
N
� O
E MAIN ST I
2ND ST S
4THSTSW 4THSTSE
�8 q
__� 1: K�/AMQNO . �
e ST R�_
I
i
i:
!i
� y SCE��
c
'� �+ o
/ � m y 11tN5�5E Pm
/ �
N
� �1 Y 22NDSTSE
/ O ` W �
/ J �� 25TH ST SE N
m ;I �' wn 26TH�5T SE
/ N \
y ky' � U
f w �j 29TH 5T SE � �
I �
e 32NDSTSE
I1 STUCK RNER�R SE
� F 36TN st�� V S
35TN W P
� � 5�SE
yt
1��' �v.
4�
\,�PQ� �o�
" l� �P .j. Q�TN ST SE
o �,ps N \
F'�' >
�qY a
SF W � \
w �
w
�
56TH ST SE a o
�, <9� �
�`92Q 2ND ST E P a I
"C�1 = I
f
�' 62ND ST SE
�
I yRN 5�5E < I
I m
�
7 sr s
� CityofAuburn /v T3 (300-4,000) Auburn Transportation Plan
O Freight Routes Classification Map
Class T-1 to T-5
� � ^� 7i �over io,000> �v r4(100- 300) Annual Tons (in thousands)
Miles
e•~'Of T2(4,000- 10,000) ^/ TS (Over 20 in 60 Days) MdP 2-4
ORD.E Pa e 234 of 751
:
.� ..
,�,.
�
` 15' _
/
i Z 50iH ST NE
I ( y���
�, SE 282ND 5�--�g2yaSL—
P
� I - 0Sa
�� � -N+ 4 D ST NW 42ND ST NE SE 286TH ST I
z i
�
w--
2�' `SE290THST W N
S 292ND ST e� w p� Q
Z 2 Z
N
y 2� ��STH ST y �
mi O
O
� 'I 67 . ¢Q' >
,^� �2= ^ SE 299TH 5T
�
y w 3�PJ
m i 3 �� � p.�1' N S H ST
0 L f' N 'I w W N W Q >
Z � z z y i SE 30�T L a i„I
� � m � x
Y U� N � \ ///"""
Z 9., ;
N ¢ /
W �'{ /
� �
Z ti �
� �� 0 SE 316TN ST /
� � �
u�i
U N BTH t9 Z5�
-i
� Z >
m ¢ �s
\ 5 324TH 5T ti w r SE 32'sRD PL -
N - F \� o
� � \
� 'u I
� 11
2ND ST S
n"
4TH ST SW ��t 4TH 5T SE
_ `�$ _ ��e�RN-s
ST ie �KDIAM➢N[1RQ.$E`
I
w
� 3
1I, U SL`��'CD
�
_7 N 1 SNS SE �m I
�� � a
N
x 22NDSTSE � ,
� �
� 25TH ST SE �
� -�+ 26TN ST SE \
D MV R E
w n F � S
� 3�ST 5T
STUCK RNER DR SE
5E
r 3 Hsj 35TH`f�PYS
p �,�SE
yS
'� 33 w
4�
I � ��
N �° 1
m �ti
�� ��?P Q�H S7 SE
N \
>
Q
�SZ SY ..�s�' � W \ �
> O
I S6TH ST SE � LL I
577 R SE
5 a I
2ND ST E P
\P'
� �1HSt S0 TH SS SE 'iv
I^� F,,�H 5 E
I_
Q
�zNo sT s
�
I Auburn Transportation Plan
�\� co��eo.u«�o�� Aubum LOS Corridors
i �n
O 1 � CityalAubum
Miles
ORD.E Pa e 235 of 751 Map 2-5
r�arµsi s
3
l 8 �
� ( ;��
,� �-
P
�l °°��� 7�
N ,,
5287TH�ST 42ND ST NW 42N�ST NE �
I � z SE287Tf{ST T+i
= r
�
< — ?4' v�i w
m '�
u' 37TH 5T NE 2 Q w
¢
. ��.� � ly Cp F S
r ' � 2 y SEZg5TH5T � �.ap
M z w p
O
�� m 2�
3 0�
�
S 02ND PL ¢ � z � ! SE 30�5T S�
� i r
z � g ��� Z � ��304TH ST 304TH 5T
3 3 z r- w
2 Q I .. . � :.y z I
ti p .i, li� ._;: � F
� 3 0 ," .I�m ' "�O J �
� � f11 II �` 27eTSiNE
x w I�� i)
a . i6THSTNE SE312THST
� K w �,} 31
? � � y c
S 318TH ST �i F p � j
U w BTHSTN 7 17 r ���
Z
N M
Z r M
ya y �
� 5 324TH ST Hi�Re Q Z � 4TH ST NE . Q�. �8�
SJO �' ��
roN' I� ? ,�� � W �; y��'�°
� LL 2� N �
W
� Vi U' � �
�
,p a7HSTSW l, Y J �
�
`J� sTH57 E� ;U AU
�� � RN-BLACK0IAMOND.gD
� �e
N
N
N iSTH ST SW � N .
:
—.— ` � . w � N SKYWPY�NSE I
n
� _ � qUg�RN w 20TH ST S
� 12 I t5 ��
�
/ 25TH ST SE � I
0 N —�E
m c� w vu'i 9pFMy R
� �
"" "�'O `C� > ^i 2y D SE �
� W �� ��
N N
a a
w �
y STUCK RIVER DR SE
cn 36SN`,�`'�E
¢
r O^i 5T SE
�n y ,�SS eL
m rA p R'�'
���� — � a ❑ 9
m s
3� �'N
� y� Fti
'� ,(l��O 9�' 4�N ST SE \
S \O� 5�5� �'FP w ,
g�SS RSFy ¢
Wq � \
Y
w
`S6 w r�i�
� 56THSTSE � �
� � Q
� P a
/ 2NDSTE
� '��n r. � 5E I I
`r .. -. PQPSQ�N�
_ �
� '
^/ =o=z ,Y mP o me = Aubum Transportation Plan
Transportation Improvement Projec[s
O 1 , \ / im5cirylmprmements
Y
MI IQS cry at nuburn
ORD.E � Page 236 of 751 Map z-6
:
�
.�.
,_,,.
�
- --w-�
i 1
2 SOTH ST NE
ti �
I � ��
❑ ,� �'1 � s�� T
P s � �
0t� p � j
e �
S287THST � Z OSTNW 42NDSTNE 5�286THST � �
� o � �
2 SE�907H 5� �
S292NDST P� __._�_- w Q-� �
� � � Fp2 � �
j y �
/ � U' �9,5 � N ,
���'�y������ � � 2 hl6T
1 I � p� j �
� �l I� '�167 � �� j i
� �..�J i � r2 � �' SE�997HST
� � �� � � �
� , � �
1 �
� y�PJ �
5305TNST � � � � Z �r�����r��mr����`s���As� HST w )
N
N � \. I �� � ? 'L� � � I
� �y ... .:� � . � y = SE 307Tr�yL Q 4
'I� N 0 r �
� w � t � i
�r� �
> J
� N � W '�VI ; Z Q ��ti��'�� r�.�r����ul
3 j ¢ 91 ' y tiS
��'�� / �' �� � z o
, �3 � � a� � � SE3167HST!
� � + � 0
� � � tle�. Y
j �9 ,� ws�BTYM m���ry�}������� ^^�y�.�
� � • � w Q _���.
�9� S 324TH 51� . � J p ti w �._. � SE 323RD PL �8�
�I vi z o
� i �
e���..��..���..�....���w �i ��� o
a�te�w�sT ' �� �,��Ahr���
� � J 2NOST5
4TH ST SW 7db�T.6�.��.�v
..IB � AVeURN-B
B�HST � �kO�AMONDRDSC�
� � I
m
,y m
Y � N r SCE�
� i �
—�— % ��.�.������+n�-�I �1tN 5�SE coPF
/ ,
ti
; y �'�u� ���' 22NDSTSE
� � q V� �
� �
� 25TH ST SE
/ � V � � 26TH 5T SE \
I m u � � pFMI 4p_
�y
� � .eorxsase.___•i--� SF 1
� Y
f
� 32ND ST S�
� STUCK RNER OR SE
� � 5�
� r �Sj 35TMW7'VS
� q 1
� o ��gE 1r
� Q1y� "��
,167 �, �
Pp� �p� �
,
� �P� �� Q?TNS75E \
w
� (vi
O N
>
� g�SS`'�SE `w4b� N �
� w vi \
� �r.irr �� Q p
� � ������67H 5T SE �
I �
� �` � P a
�� � 2N0 ST E
{. 62ND ST SE
64TH 5�SE � ,��1'f�Ns
���
`� a vl _
� ` � -�
F
��'�ilffr � tl
72N�ST S
�j City of Aubum ♦ PED Signal
Iv� Future Variable Message ■ Counry Signal Auburn Transportation Plan
• Cicy s;gnai • wsoor Intelligent Transportation Systems
Q 1 �V ITS Copper
Mil@5 ^� ITS Fiber
ORD.E ��e�� Future ITS Comdor Pa e 237 of 751 Map 2-7
������F � � ���°� Comprehensive Trans�portation Plan
.�.�..T�I.T�.�T '
��..�,,,, �n��sH r�vc-ra�v
. ��
.
� _ . ___ . ._.___ __ _ _
CIi�4PTE6t 3.
., \``�?�_
" (�� I�� `� . �' �� � .:`�-''}- '°
� � � �I ,� �- _:
�,..
� ;;? s, ,,'.
Non-motorized transportation is an integral
� � .,;
component of Auburn's transportation system. T
� Non-motorized travel includes walking,bicycling, ��� �.,=�� � `
��.
and equestrian travel.The Ciry seeks to enhance the � ' � ��:
� �
�
non-motorized travel environment both for � �' ��`�°';��� `t� ��°� ��„�
.� � �
recreational travel and t'rips that might otherwise be � �� "���� �� �� p�����"�"",�
�,...��
taken via a car orbus in order to improve mobility Riding�on the Interurban Trai/
and environmental health.
The Ciry recognizes that the evolution of the
transportation system has prioritized the automobile as the primary travel mode.A side effect of
this process has been the erosion of condirions favorable to non-motorized travel.This chapter
seeks to redress the balance by enhancing conditions in which non-motorized modes are a realisric
and attractive travel option,
Planning and developing a strong non-motorized network supports several state and national acts
including Washington's Growth Management Act, Commute Trip Reduction Act, the federal Clean
Air Act,the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA), MAP 21 (Federal Surface Transportarion Bill)
and its successors. Supporting the non-motorized system helps ensure compliance with these
initiatives and the he.althy comrnuniry principles espoused by PSRC through Vision 2040. It also
increases funding opportunities for Ciry projects. Improving the non-motorized system also helps
address the findings of the cirywide Health Impact Assessmerit process which recommended that
the Ciry improve sidewalk connectivity,improve the pedestrian environment,eliminate naEural and
man-made mobiliry barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists,improve transit access,improve tr.aff e
safety,pedestrian safery and personal securiry.
This chapter is divided into three subsections: pedestrian travel, bicycle travel,and equestrian travel.
Each subsecrion contains an assessment of existing conditions and needs, followed by guidelines
for development of the future system.
�.1 � s 1 7'rav�l
As a Regional Growth Center, the Ciry encourages tr.ansportation planning that emerges from a
elear land-use plan based on a community vision and the values expressed in Imagine Auburn. In
this vision,Aubum supports higher density housing in the downtown;neighborhood commercial
districts; and landscaped, pedestrian-oriented street and sidewalk de.sign. This pattern of
development rein.forees a positive pedestrian environment;
(,hcrpte��_3. Ni�n-t�loto�z�;cd Iiai�.�porlcrtio�t 1'�i,c>-1
ORD.E Page 238 of751
��TX°� - � � =�f Comprehensive Transportation Plan
������
x�`'c---�'"�'� WASNi,"JGT(JN
� � � � -. .. � �
� ��� � �� " i
�� ���� ' � ��`� � ' � �n NE�EDS ASSESSME�NT
� �•. .
-� ' � � � � � � Auburn has many assets;which contribute to a�
welcoming pedestrian environment,most notably a
�.�, �'� �' ` pedestrian-scaled downtown and an extensive
• ;'�' � network of tr.ails;'I'he needs assessment highlights
�` �,r these e�sting assets and identifies unprovement
m _ �. �:;:��� - � � �
• � ' needs.
��
,:��:�
�,;��� _ EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT
°" "��"$} As a whole,Auburn's urban fabric in the downtown
New Pedesfr►"an Crossing at Green RiVer has remained intact and supports a positive
College on 5 320 Street pedestrian environment. Businesses, shops,and
single-family homes front streets with sidewalks and
street trees: However, some of the older seetions of sidewalks need repair or replacement.
Since adoption of the 2009 Trans�ortatzon Plan;there have been sidewalk,ADA and lightirig
improvements to Main Street,S Division Street Promenade, Ciry Hall Plaza and Plaza Park and
behind the shops on East Main Street. New growth in the downtown core has or will result in the
development of multi- story residential and office buildings and senior housing,helping renew the
pedestrian irifrastructure a.nd creating a need for continued effort to maintain and improve the
sidewalk system. In addition; the Sounder commuter rail station and transit hub at West Main Street
and C Street SW provide pedestrians more options for connecting to regional desrinations.These
improvements contribute to a more hospitable environment for pedestrians. The ciry has an annual
sidewalk repair progra.m whieh focuses on ADA improveiinents,responding to eomplaints,
repairing identified hazards,and improving areas with high pedestrian use.
Commercial development outside the downtown e�sts primarily along arterials and is dominated
by strip development and auto-oriented businesses. Although sidewalks are provided on most
arterials;pedestrians may feel exposed to the traffic:Surface parking lots border the sidewalks,and
driveways interrupt the continuity of the sidewalk system.The heavy volumeS of vehicular traffie
and wide streets along arterials, such as Auburn Way,pose a barrier for pedestrians walking along
or crossing the roadway.
Sidewalk Inventory
A sidewalk inventory was conducted as part of the Plan update in 2005.A subsequent inventory
was conducted in 2008 to collect sidewalk data for the West Hill and Lea Hill where a large scale
annexation into the City took place in 2007. The inventory identifes sidewalks in the Ciry,and rated
their condirion.This inventory continues to serve as a guide to help the Ciry identify problem areas
and program.improvements according to prioritization guidelines,outlined later in this chapter:
The older residenrial neighborhoods tend to have sidewalks on both sides of the street,but they
vary widely in condition and construcrion standards; Some residential areas, sueh as southwest Lea
Hill,were built under King Counry's jurisdiction and s.id.ewalk construcrion was not required.
Breaks in the sidewalk network require pedestrians to maneuver around parked.cars,into priva.te
yards,or into the street. In newer neighborhoods such as Lakeland Hills, sidewalks built to the ciry
standards applicable at the time of their construction are provided on both sicies of the street.
Cl�cip�er.3. No�F-tLfoto�z�ed"l.ian.rf�ortciliori ('c:oe_3-2
ORD.E Page 239 of 751
� A
` /a,
e�T}°r - � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
,,�"'"..K-" ' WASHlftiGTC7N
The sidewalk survey of the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas revealed a sporadic and often
disconnected sidewalk system. Several of the newer residential developments liave sidewalks,but
many of the older residential areas and arterial streets are missing large segments of sidewalk,
resulting in an inconsistent pedestrian environment. Map 3-1 illustrates the e�sting and proposed
sidewalk network within the Ciry:
' Trail Network
Auburn's developing trail network provides local and regional connections for both recreational use
and commuting. Currently the only regional trails that have been developed include the Interurban
and portions of the Green River and White River Trails.'I'he Lakeland Hills Trail network provides
connections to neighborhood parks,communiry.center, and to the City of Sumner via a tunnel
under the BNSF railway.Map 3-2 illustrates the existing and proposed trail network within the City.
SCHOOL ACCESSIBILITY
School safety is a major concern for parents, students, the school distriets, and the City alike. The
Auburn School District,working with an advisory committee,has established a safe walking area
for each elementary and middle school based on the presence of sidewalks,walking paths, and safe
neighborhood streets, a.s well as the availability of safe street crossings and the traffic conditions in
the surrounding neighborhoods. All routes witliin the safe walking areas are designated as `Safe
Routes to School'. Occasionally,individual schools will notify parents and students of preferred
walking routes within each area.
Since the l.ast ma.jor update of the compr.ehensive plan the following Safe Walking Routes
improvements have been made thrbughout Auburn;
• School Zone Flashing Beacons were installed at all elementary and middle schools.
a Rectangular Rapid Fla.shing Warning Beacons were installed at the existing crosswalk at E St
NE and 4th St NE for Washington Elementary.
• A new crosswalk�with warning signage and ADA pedestrian ramps was installed at K St SE
&23rd St.SE for Pioneer Elementary.This also improved drainage on the street.
• Rainier Middle School received irnproved crosswalks, signage,and ADA pedestrian ramps
along 11 Cith Ave SE.
• Lea Hill Elementary received 600 feet of sidewalk,curb and gutter, and ADA pedestrian
ramps on the south side of SE 312th Street as well as pedestrian push bu.ttons and
countdown pedestrian signal heads at the intersect,ion of SE 312th Street and 124th Ave SE.
• The new Auburn High School created all new sidewalk and crosswalks with bulb outs on
both East Main Street and 4th Street NE.
• New crosswalks with waming signage,ADA pedestrian ramps, and curb bulb outs were
added at Terminal Park Elementary.
• New curb,gutter,ADA ped.estrian ramps a.nd payement was constructed on H St SE
between 17th and 21 st St SE for Olympic Nliddle School.
C,ha�iter.3. JVnndl7otori�ed lrafir�ir�rYutiaiz I'ur;c3-3
ORD.E Page 240 of 751
ciTv ca� .�.
��j � e�► ���� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
0.1����\.1�I
;�-`�—�`� w�s H t t��To N
Some of these improvements were made possible by a Safe Routes to Sehool grant. The flashing
beacons have been funded through a combination of grant programs and Ciry resources.
Despite the progress that has been made over the past several years, there are still:areas of need.
The following needs were idenrified to enhance and improve the safety for school children in and
around the school safe walking areas.
Pioneer Elemenkary School
Curb&gutter, sidewalks and ADA ramps along K St SE between 21 st St SE and 25th St SE.
Cascade Middle School
The crossing at M Street NE and 24th Street NE experiences heavy traffic.The Ciry and school
district continue to cooperate to increase the safery of this crossing near the sehooL
Dick Seobee Elemenfary School
The City will continue to coordinate with the School District in exploring ways to improve access
to surrounding neighborho.ods to increase the school's designated safe walking area.
Terminal Paik Elementary School
Curb gutter, sidewalks, and ADA ramps along B St SE between 12th St SE and 17th St SE.
Evergreen Heights Elementary School
Curb,gutter, sidewalks,and roadway improvements
along S 316th between 51 st Ave S and the eastern
boundary of the school.This includes access and ` ' ,, �� '° ��
circulation improvements to the school and '� � �' `
.;�� �ri
intersection improvements at 56th Ave S. ' �
z �. ,oe
, , .,
Hazelwood Elementary School � " "`g
Sidewalk and ADA curb ramp 'improvements along
SE 304th Street between 112th Ave SE and 116th
Ave SE and along 118th Ave SE from SE 304th to
the noi-�h. Safe Walking Route to School
Lea Hill Elementary School
Sidewalks and ADA ramps along both sides of
124th Ave SE between SE 304th St and SE 312th
St.
Mountain View High School
Sidewalks along 124th Ave SE between SE 284th St and SE 304th St,and along 132nd.Ave SE
between SE 288.th St and SE 299th St.
Riverside High School&Ilalko Elementary
Pedestrian crossing of A Street SE and the BNSF Railway would greatly benefit students at these
two schools.A 2015 study idenrified a preferred crossing alternarive for future development:.
Cl�af�ler•3. Non-[l�Iotoritiec�'1�rcinsporYa�zoyi P�xoe 3-4
ORD.E Page 241 of 751
� �
�������r A' �� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� �����
�— � w�sH�hrGTC7tv
Lakeland Hills Elementary
Eneou.raging inereased walking and biking to this school would provide the greatest benefit for
easing traffic congestion and safety concerns. Additionally an onsite parking and access redesign
would further reduce school pick up and drop off related congestion.
Chinook Elementary
Sidewalks along Auburn Way South between Hemlock St SE and Academy Dr SE.Additionally
interseetion improvements have been identified to reduce confliets and improve eircula.tion for
buses.
Accessible Routes of Travel
The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) requires that all new public,commercial and i
institutional developments meet ADA standards. Furtliermore,e�cisting public buildings,public
outdoor faciliries, and public rights-of-way shall be retrofitted to achieve accessibiliry. An accessible
route of travel is designated to accommodate the needs of many different people,including those
who are blind,using wheelchairs,pushing a stroller or cart,or injured.The law requires that
municipalities have a transition plan in place to address ADA issues. The City ofAuburn is in the
process of completing that plan and ADA design specifications can be found in the Auburn
Engineering Design Standards manual.
Site Design
Aedestrian conditions should be evaluated at the earliest stage of new development.The zone
between the development and the public right-of-way needs to contribute to pedestrian network
connectivity and continuity. In addition to the public right-of-way, the interior of the site ought to
be examined for suitable pedestrian circulation, and how the two are connected. Wherever possible,
walkways should be placed along the most direct routes to connect buildings,parking,bus stops,
and other attractions. In some cases,walking trails that link residenrial streets to collectors or
arterials can provide a more direct pedestrian connection than travel along the sidewalk network,
particularly in neighborhoods without a street grid system, specifically those with cul-de-sacs.
FUTURE SYSTEM
This section describes the Ciry's vision fbr the future pedestrian system and identifies programs and
initiatives that will enable it to achieve this vision.
Down#own
The downtown is historically the social heart of the community, a place for people to interact. It is
considered one of the primary pedestrian-oriented areas in the Ciry. Important exisring pedestrian
clowntown linkages include eonnections from W Ma.in Street to the transit hub and commuter rail
station,and between W Main Street and the Multicare Auburn Medical Center.The Doivntoivn Plan;
a special area plan adopted in 2001 as part of the City's Corrr�rehensive Plan,anricipates high
pedestrian oriented developments in this area,partieularly around the Auburn Station. The
Doivntoivn Plan also ident'tf es W Main Street,A Street SW,Division Street, and the alley south of
Main Street as high prioriry pedestrian corridors. In addition, several recently completed projects
have helped improve non-motorized access to the downtown and transit station;including the Ci.ry
Ch�r(�ter 3. .1��on-t1�lotai�ed'Iran.i�ait�eticuz Pc��c 3-5
ORD.E Page 242 of 751
��, m�,'
��T}°F �;�- Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� � ry . � � .
��,-��"`�� was��i�rscroN
Hall Plaza and Plaza Park project completed in 2010, the Division Street Promenade Project
completed in 2012 and the A Street NW Extension project, opened in June 2013..
Auburn Station has created demand for new mixed-use development,including commercial and
residential elements.The Ciry is committed to focusing new eommercial and residential
development adjacent to the Auburn Stafion and has been working on partnerships to bring several
mixed-use developments to Downtown.These developments include pedestrian friendly design and
streetscape improvements. �
A vital pedestrian network that ex.tends beyond downtown is a key element in the revitalization of
the downtown core.
Commercial Comidors
The Ciry should encourage major employers to locate near transit routes and stops. Furthermore,
pedestrian conneetions from residential areas to eommercial corridors can be enhanced through site
design policies that encourage more direct non-motorized connections to major retail locarions,
Future planning along commercial corridors should also include amenities such as landscaping
adjacent to the sidewalk,improved.pedestrian crossings,and enhanced bus stops at high use
locations:
Auburn lias several commercial corridors,most notably Auburn Way North and South, that are
frequently traveled by pedestrians. While most of these areas have sidewalks, there is tlie
opportuniry to enhance the pedestrian environment by providing addiuonal protected crossings,
mak'tng improvements to lighting,completing remaining sidewalk gaps and eliminating ADA
accessikiiliry barriers. For instance,pedestriari erossing issues arise because pedestrians often cross
at uncontrolled or mid-block locations rather than walking to the nearest signalized erossing. This
dynamic is partially attributa.ble to the location of bus stops in relation to employment centers.
Hence, efforts should be made to locate bus stops so commuters crossing to the opposite side of
the road are dropped off and picked up near a signalized intersection:.
Residential Neighborhoods
Investment in Auburn's neighborhoods is an essenrial component of providing a comprehensive
and funcdonal pedestrian network. As noted in the needs assessriient, sidewalk conditions va.ry
throughout the Ciry.This plan acknowledges the need to retrofit the pedestrian network in many
areas of the City and incorporate pedestrian faciliries into new development: Financial mechanisms
to help aecomplish..this goal are described later in. this chapter.
High Priority Pedestrian Corridors
Map 3-1 identifies High Prioriry Pedestrian Corridors that are currently lacking,a complete sidewalk
spstein. Some of the corridors have sidewalks on one side or for portions of the corridor. Others
are missing sidewalks altogether.
These High Prioriry Pedestrian Corndors were selected based on the following criteria:pedestrian
volumes;proximiry to schools,parks;transit routes and commercial areas;and where riiissing gaps
can be completed.
Cl.�a�ter 3: 1Von-llntnn�ed"lirrru�ortatiou Prr,e 3-(
ORD.E Page 243 of 751
� ,,-' -
c�����y � �"w Comprehensive Transportation Plan
-�. �.,.�.`��..����°a�
� `� titnsF��rrcr'rc�N
The High Priority Pedestrian Corridors are roadway corridors where the Ciry intends to target
investment in pedestrian facilities.The City's currenY half street policy requires sidewalk to be
constructed by developers whenever significant improvements are made to a properry.`This has
proven to be an effecuve means of building out the sidewalk network. However,it is a slow process
because it relies on new development or
redevelopment to occur,making it difficult to ���
complete whole corridors. By programming ��'"°�`��'
specific pedestrian corridors for investment, the �; -
Ciry can leverage grant dollars.and other �A
resources to more strategically complete gaps in
key pedestrian corridors.
The High Prioriry Pedestrian Corridors �,�` =� ;� � �
� � ��,� � ,
identified in Map 3-1 are regularly reviewed for �� ��.,� � �� ���-� � ��_�`�';�
inclusion in the City's Six-Year Transportation �S� ' ��� � � �� _�� �' ��'���
Improvement Program and for grant funding ` �' �` � �`��,�`�""�"���`Y` ��`
opportunities. Aubu�n Multi-Use Trail
NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS
�,
The Auburn Parks,Recreation&Open Space Plan is currendy being updated and will identify
specific projects for the development of local and regional trails. Thus far the long term list
includes:
T'he Auburn-Pacific Trail provides a multi-use path that improves access from the White River to
the Interurban Trail.A planned pedestrian crossing;under the BNSF railroad tra.cks just north of
the BNSF Stuck River Bridge (over the White River),will improve the regional trail system by
providing a connection between the Ciry of Pacific and Auburn's White River Trail connection to A
Street SE.
Funding is still needed for the Auburn section of the Green RiVer Trail. Planning efforts are also
focused on the Auburn Environmental Park and connecung the park to the Interurban Trail.Tliis
unigue park project shows residents the diversity of the ecosystem along the Mill Creek corridor.
Additional trail planning is underway for eonnecting the Fenster Natural Park to the Gre.en Valley
Road area.
An important component of Auburn's trail system includes trailheads. Trailheads should be inviring �
to users and provide amenities such as parking,bicycle racks,informarion kiosks,restroom faciliries,
water fountains, trash receptacles,and seating facilities.Trailheads should be constructed and
improved as Auburn's trail system further develops. See Map 3-2 for existing and proposed tra,ils
and trailhead locations.
FUIVDING MECHANISMS
Sidewalk Improvement Program
The City of Auburn ha.s an Annual Citywide Sidewalk Repair and Improvement Program to repair
damaged sidewalks, tripping ha.zards, and to complete small missing links in the sidewalk network.
Ch�rfiter3. �'��on-t�lotaz�c�lT'ra�r.r�ot7ation l'rr�e>_'
ORD.E Page 244 of 751 I
�� � .�r;
��g���F " � �� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
���� =°��
• WASHINGTQN
These funds are essential for promoting non-rnotorized travel and can be used to leverage other
funding sourees,sueh as state and federal grants or other city capital projects.
Auburn has idenufied three principal areas in which sidewalk improvements should be priorirized:
corridors that provide access to and within the downtown, school zones,and parks with a focus
on addressing potential hazards and areas of known complaints. Additional criteria for prioriry
access imp.rovement could include,but are not limited to,areas with higli concentrarions of seriior
citizens or disabled cirizens,areas with high volumes of pedestrian-transit interacrion;areas where
private improvements such as trees have damage the public infrastructure and areas where property
owners are willing to financially participate in the construction of sidewalk improvements through a
local improvement district (LID). In considering projects, staff also review e�sting street deferral
agreements to determine if the improvernerits previously a.11owed to be deferred are now needed
and should be completed by the private parry.
"Save Our Streets"Program Sidewalks will be prioritized:
In November 2004,Auburn residents approved ' Where hazardous conditions are
Proposirion 1, "Save Our Street"Program,which present;
created a dedicated local street fund.'Tliis money ' On school walk routes;
was set aside for repair and maintenance of local ■ Where extensive improvements are
roadways which can sometimes also include needed in a single neighborhood;°
sidewalk repair and rebuild. In 2013,the ciry ■ Alongstreets with curb and gutter, '
couneil inodified the funding source for this . �ong Downtown pedestrian ''
program to be from Construction Sales Tax corridors; .
revenues and no longer from property taxes. =
■ Where curb iamps are missing;and ;
"Arterial Preservation"Program ' Wkere they will complete a missing ;
link in a pedestrian network. :
The City also currendy implements the annual . �ereproperty owners are willing ta,
arterial street preservation program funded by a financ'ially parucipate in the
1%utility tax. Pedestrian,ADA,and safety consenicrion of sidewalk
improvements are included in many of the arterial improvemerits through an LID e
improvement projects funded by this program. . =� '
Local Improvement Districts
Local Impfovement Districts (LID) enable ciry investment in a specified area by leveraging ci;ry
funds with contributions from properry owners in the district. LID's use limited ciry resources to
improve neighborhood qualiry and can be used to finance new sidewalks.
Safety Education and Enforcement
Awa.reness of pedestrian safe.ty issues should be promoted through educarional programs and
enforcement efforts.This combination helps reinforce key safety issues such as safe pedestrian
crossings and speeding. The City will proacrively work to idenrify problem areas and issues. The
following list contains examples of some techniques that can be employed in these efforts.
� Maintaining non-motorized travel informarion kiosks at key City desunauons (e.g.Main Street;Outlet
Collection,Emerald Downs,trails).
Cb��f�trr 3. i'�'on-�llotnri:�ed"I iart.rportc�fiioi� P�z;e 3-8
ORD.E Page 245 of 751
. �__�
�,TY�F Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��:��� �
-�� �h'ASHINGTON
■ Displaying educational information in City publications,on the website,and on T`V.
■ Maintaining and expanding wayfinding signage to direct pedestrians and bicyclists.
■ Partnering with the School District to teach children safe walking and biking behaviors.
� Launching public information campaigns for problematic locarions and partnering with the Police
Department to provide enforcement.
■ Increasing driver awareness of vehiele speeds through the presence of radar speed signs where
appzopriate.
Enforcing pedestrian,bicyclist,and driver infractions.
3.2 i�ycle 1'ravel
Bicycle faciliries are an important component of Auburn's transportation and recreational
infrastructure. Bicycling provides ari environmentally friendly travel mode and helps cirizens to
maintain a healtliy lifestyle. It also helps improve traffic congestion and air quality by providing an
alternative to driving. Increasingly,bicycle commuting is becoming a more popula.r alternative,and
the City must take steps to provide a more fu.netional and attractive network for commute cyclists,
in addition to recreational cyclists.
NEE�S ASSESSMENT
Exisfing Conditions
The topography in the Auburn Valley is flat and conducive to cycling for a range of skill levels.
Areas along the Green and White Rivers provide reereational opportuniries for mulri-use trails that
accommodate bicyclists,pedestrians and equestrians.The Interurban Trail is part of a major north-
south regional trail system.The Green River trail is also an extension of a north-south regional trail.
Therefore,Auburn has a good network of existing or planned north-south recreational trails.
However, there are few existing cross-town connections and new connections onto the West Hill
and Lea Hill are needed.
Cross-town bike connections to the West Hill and Lea Hill areas of Auburn are more challenging
due to steep topography.Yet investing in these connections is important bec.ause a significant
number of Auburn residents live in these areas. Building these connections would improve bicycle
access to regional transit,local employment the regional trail system,and to downtown Auburn.
Recreational and commuter cyclists travel along the Interurban Trail to areas north and south of
Auburn. Cyclists also frequendy ride along S 277th Street to the east side of Greeri River Road,and
down along the Green River to 8th Street NE,or down R Street NE to SE Aubum Black Diamond
Road. SE Auburn Black Diamond Road and SE Green Valley Road are popular routes for
accessing areas east of Auburn. However, these roa.ds are chara.cterized by cliallenging eyeling
condirions and are not su.itable for inexperienced cyclists. Once in Auburn;there is especially a need
to increase the nurriber of east-west bicycle facilities. Investing in trail connecrions to improve
bicycle access in these areas should also be a priority.
Bicycle lanes are limited on ciry arterials and collectors, making it diffieult both for regional and
local riders to navigate for any reasonable distanee through the Ciry: Limited bicycle storage is also
a hindrance to cyclists. Map 3-2 identifies existing and planned trails and bike facilities in the City.
Cbapter 3. .�'��ar�-!blataz�ed'Ti�auspui�ation Pakc>-9
ORD.E Page 246 of 751
x ,,:
��T�QF .� • Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.�� F.=� ��� �
wAs�+i��craN
Aubu_rn Bicycle Tas.k Force
In March 2010, the ciry formed the Ciry of Auburn Bicycle Task Force. It was intended that the
Bicycle Task Force would further refine the City's goals and policies for its bicycle transportarion
system. The Task Force was comprised of a broad cross section of community members and
interested parties that were charged to develop recommendations on bicycle facilities,issues and
opportunities centered on the following three principlesc
• Connections—for e.x.ample;how do bicycle ridefs get from the north end to the south end
of the Ciry or from Lakeland to Lea Hill?
• Recreation Oppottur�ities—for example,how does the Ciry further build and capitalize
on a bicycle network to support and enhance the recreation options for its citizens?
• EconomicDevelopment—for example,how does the City capitalize on the Interurban
Trail as a conduit of customers for existing and new businesses?
Bike Improvements Completed and Planned in the Near-Term Future
T'he work of the task force has informed and guided ciry decisions on future bike lane and trail
improvements and connecrions. Its work is direcdy reflected in 'improvements already made as well
as the future bike lanes and trail improvements shown in Map 3-2.
Since 2009 bike lanes have been added to 124th Ave SE,and SE 320th Street near Green River
College on Lea Hill,a new bike lane connection has been created by the construcrion of the new A
Street NW corridor. Bikes lanes have been added as part of the new M Street SE BNSF underpass
project and sharrows (share the road w-ith bike symbols) have been added to East Main Street.
Bike lanes are part of the new planned West Main Street project and the F Street SE project
includes development of a Bicycle Boulevard and Bike Share Program.
Bicycle Facility ClassificaHon
The American Associafion of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has developed
classifications for bicycle facilities andparking. Bicycle classification is based on the design and
_ _ _.__.. .__ ___ . . �_ . . .._._. _._ .
exc usiveness o use.
Bicycie Facilifiy Clasaification Existing Class I multi-use trails in the City
■ Facility(Class I)—A non- include S 277th St;Interurban Trail,White River
Separate
rnotonzed two-way paved faciliry,that is Trail, and Green River Trails.
. , physic.ally separated from motorized
vehicular traffic by an open space or Class II bicycle lanes added since the lasr major
barrier: update include;
■ Bike Lane(Class In-An exclusive on ■ Terrace Drive NW(15th to W St)
street orie way lane for bicyclists � A ST NW/B ST NW(3rd to 30th)
delirieated with signing ancl striping
� 14th St NW(A NW to A NE)
�- Shared Lanes (Class IIn—A.lane sha"red
by vehicles and birycles.Wider lanes.that ° R St SE(17th to White River)
may be delineated with shared use ° M St SE(3rd to 8th)
markings and signage. � 116th Ave SE (SE 304th to SE 312th)
o` Bicycle Boulevard—A bicycle focused
roadway designated with enhanced
signage and special pavement markings
and biryele-frieridly design staadards P�r;e 3-1[1
such as wide curb lanes and bieycle safe
OR .E �'��tes.Typically designed to Page 247 of 751
connect key bitycle destinarions.
�
�����}� ; Comprehensive Transportation Plan
��
wn����r�crrc��v
Class III shared facilities were tested on R St NE/SE,Auburn Black Diamond Road and"E Main
St.They were well received by the cycling community and continue to be maintained. Shared
faciliries will continue to be implemented on other appropriate roadways.
Bike parking facilities are classified by length of use: long term,medium term,and short term. The
longer bikes are to be stored; the more durable the faciliry's design must be.
Long term bike storage facilities are available at Auburn Station. The Gity currendy provides short
term bike storage throughout the downtown core.
Improvement Needs
Cyclists desire safe routes that make connecfions throughout the City a.nd to regional points of
interests.The e�sring facilities while being continuously improved still fall short of creating a well-
connected bicycle network in Auburn. The Ciry plans to build out the bicycle network shown in
Map 3-2 and provide better east-west connections. Upgrading bicycle facilities on city streets is a
very important component of this plan.
Auburn shall make greater efforts in the future to encourage bicycle use,particularly for commuting
purposes,as a.form of transportation demand management (TD1Vn. One mechanism of doing so is
to ensure that bike lanes and trails which serve major employers are prioritized. The City needs to
take a more aggressive role in programming implementation of the future bicycle network identified
in this chapter,ensuring that eventually all residenes of and eriiployees in Auburn feel comfortable
commuting on bike. In addition,Auburn should seek outlets,including the City's website;to .
provide up-to-date information on bicycling options within the Ciry and to regional destinations.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program provides a formal mechanism for encouraging these
practices and is required by state law for employers with 100 or more employees arriving at a single
location during the AM peak.Auburn's CTR program calls out bicycle storage facilities;lockers;
changing areas, and showers as measures employers can take to.meet CTR goals. In addition,
Auburn can use the SEPA process to eneourage development of these facilities at the time of new
development or tenant improvements.
The Doavnto�vn Plan also discusses the need for improving bicycle facilities in the area. On-street
bicgcle facilities will be sought in association with planned roadway improvements. In addition,the
City should irivestigate providing bicycle storage and other a.menities on Ciry owned properties.
� � ; ;�, FUTUFtE TF2�A10EL
.. ,� ��+�-��.� '' ; � ��
��� ,. . .
����- t t I -'' � �� The future bicycle network mcludes corridors for
�� �a� � '�° �
.
F ,� regional,recreational,and cross-town
3 �, s :� connections.The regional corridors will provide
�
�.w� ` ' �� ��€f.: � �a�� •
�;�; E�€ g����� connect�ons to the Valley communities as well other ,
��_� , .-a� ��� �3 ..,� �� � ,s�F� ��
�, �,���,��.,� areas of I�ing and Pierce Counties. Local biking
, , �'� '� � � groups haye identified the Interurban Trail and
„` ' ,, ' ;��,� ; � Green River Trail as important regional connections:
:�; 43. • k Qther planned regional connecrioris will link Auburn
to attractions around the Puget Sound.
The Work is Easier when Shared
L;X�ufiter 3. ;�;iin,:llot�r-atcd 1 i�r.r�vrxaticuz F'«�e�-1/
ORD.E Page 248 of 751
�' ����
��T}°g Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.���
� .�_�� �����,�����
TYie Green and White River corridors are multi-functional,providing recreational opportunities for
regional and local bicycle trips.Therefore, the Ciry has prioritized the completion of both these trail
s.ystems. Also,Auburn will seek to enhance portions of City trail systems whenever possible,by
providing amenities for non-motorized travelers such as rest areas, as well as safery improvements
including w.arning sigziage arid grade separ.ated trails. As shown in Map 3-2, the bicycle routes
identified for future developmerit will consist of a mix of interconnected local trails and on= street
bike facilities linking Auburn's neighborhoods.
The future Bonneville Power Trail will be a separated,hard surfaced trail crossing the Lea Hill area
and connecting to the Interurban Trail and West Hill via on-street bicycle facilities.;This new bike
route is planned from Lea Hill through Isaac Evans and Dykstra Park to conrieet to dowritown
Aubnrn via the new A Street NW corridor. Numerous other on-street bicycle faciliti'es and trails
are planned.
_
The selecrion of bike facility projects.will be based upon safery,route conrinuiry and connecrivity.
In addirion to new bicycle corridors, spot safery improvements are an important component of the
City's future bicycle network. Improvemerits ineluding flashing beacons have already been made at
the Interurban Trail crossing of 15th Street SW and are planned'at the Interurban Trail crossing of
Wesx Main Street and C Streex SW and Ellingson. In addirion, safe access to downtown Auburn and
onto West HiIl,Lea Hill and Lakeland are a prioriry for the Ciry.
Typical bicycle route irriprovements alorig a Class I faciliry include purehasing the right-qf-way,
designing the tra'il, and construcring the traIl and trailhead.`For a Class II pathway,improvements
include striping lanes,installing warning and direcrional signage,and painting bike symbols on the
pavemenE. For a roadway where bikes will share the lane with�ehicles it may include the installation
of shaxed use markings and signage.
As this plan is updated in the future,emphasis should continue to be pYaced on developing a safe
and convenient bicycling environment for both recreational and commuter cyclists of all experience
levels.
.3 estria rave6
Auburn citizens have a long history of supporting the planning and development of equestrian
facilities.The City intends to incre.ase its network of soft-surface,multi-use trails in more rustic
locations with appropriate facilities suitable for equestrian use.
IVEEDS ASSESSIUIEi�T
EXISTING.CONDITIOIVS
Auburn's equestrian trai,l sgstem is quite limited.The Parks Departmerit currently manages a two-
mile, soft-surface trail,along the White River at Roegner and Game Farm Wilderness Parks.
Otherwise,there are no fbrmal equestrian trails in Auburn.
Horse owners do have informal access to the soft-surface path adjacent to the Interurban trail, as
well as large open spaces in the rusric area just south of the White River and east of I�ersey Way in
southeast Auburn.Tb reach the open areas,many ride along the edge of roads such as 53rd and
56th Streets SE.These are narrow roads with gravel shoulders. Drainage swales run parallel Eo many
Chr�j�tar 3. _n,'on-Mnto�z�ed�1'rart.cportcz�zorz 1�re�e_3-12
ORD.E Page 249 of 751
ta��°} ���� 4 � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
`,� `��►�
. ' w�s�t�eyrt��v
portioris of these roads,and while eonditions vary, typically there is a narrow unpaved shoulder or
grassed area alongside the road where horses can walk.
IMPROVEMENT NEEDS
The lack of equestrian trail miles in the Ciry and connectiviry to regional equestrian facilities are two
areas that need improvement. As indicated by Table 3-1, there are cu.rrently two-miles of formal
equestrian trails in the City.This is a barrier to most equestrians,particularly those bringing horses
via trailer, In order to become a more equestrian friendly community,Auburn must undertake
planriing initiatives to expand the current network.
Table 3-1 Existing Equestrian Facilities
�
�� - i��'� �
9 .
Soft- Equestrians
surface Off.-road Cyclists 2.17 miles
Trail Pedestrians
Auburn, as a regional growth center,has elected to become increasingly urbanized.: As the Ciry
eontinues to urbanize,it will seek opportunities to include equestrian planning in its infrastructure
improvements. Special consideration for equestrian facilities should be given to southeast Auburn
and Lea Hill as both have e�sting equestrian¢ommuniries.
Loop trail development is one strategy that can be employed to iricrease the length of equestrian
tr.ails in Auburn. Loop trails can be linked to e�sring linear facilities, thereby increasing nerivork
mIles:
Opportunities to expand the equestrian trail system should be considered in all future infrastructure
planning and development. Features such as busy arterial streets;steep slopes and narrow bridges
are barriers to equestrian travel. Hence, equestrian trail planning should go hand in liarid with oth_er
planning activities the C.ity is undertaking.When planning equestrian trails,other facilities such as
trailer parking and directional signage should be accomrnodated,
FUT'U�iE SVSTEM
The southeast Auburn area, south of the White (Stuck) River and east of Kersey Way, should be
designated as an Equestrian District. Future development in this area should be consistent with that
designation. Southeast Auburn is pardcularly suitable as an Equestrian District because it contains a
City watershed, shorelines of statewide significance,and numerous critical areas. E,questrian trails
may be situated ne.ar some of these features,whereas more intense development may be unsuitable;
_
Equestrian trails may also be appropriate for parts of Lea Hill,and should be evaluated.When
locating e,questrian trails along rustic roads,it may be appropriate to ma�mize trail potential by
constructing a wider shoulder able to accommodate equestriari travel on one side of the road.
1Vlembers of the e:questrian community in Auburn have emphasized the desire for a trail connection
betwee.n Roegner Park and southeast Auburn. One p.otential alignment would be along a route
roughly pa.rallel to Kersey Way and 53rd Street SE.The Parks Plan identifies xhis future trail as the
C.-h�spter 3. '�'rua:llot�rz:�ed 1'ra�r.rp�r7atir,fa P«�c>-1�
ORD.E Page 250 of 751
������� ' �°sxt � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
. .�.,�� .� T ,
_�—_, wasFl�;'�iG�t`C3N
Williams Trail. Potential obstacles inelude critical area impacts and right-of.-way acquisirion. The
topograpliy:along Kersey Way includes steep hillsides and large drainage swales. As trail planning
progresseS to a more detailed level,other alignments should be evaluated.
The equestrian routes identified for future development are concentrated along the White River,the
Green River,and in the properties in southeast Auburn.These routes are identified as soft-surface,
mulri-use tra.ils thatare suitable for riding and walking but do not meet the requirements of the
Americans with Disab.ilities Act..Construcuon costs and the extent of clearing rieeded are much less
for soft-surface trails than for paved traals.Some of the soft-surface trails are proposed to occur in
conjunction with:a paved trail. Summaries of trails that are appropriate for equestrian use are listed
in Table 3-2.Design specificarions for equestrian trails w'ill be incorporated into the Auburn
Engineering De.rign Standards manual.
3. Fu#ure IVoo�-m�torized �y�ter�
Auburn's future non-motorized system consists of an interconnected network of sidewalks,bike
_ _
lanes,multi-use trails,and eques,trian paths.The list of proposed projects in Table 3-2 is developed
for planning purposes. Map 3-2 identifies the location of the trail projects identifie.d in Table 3-2
and maps the future trail and bicycle network:
Table 3=2 Fufure Trail Pcojects
�
� e e
Green River This paved trail wil.l tie part of a regional re.cre.ational co�ridqr: K.ing County is the lead Bicyclists
Trail adm'inistrator of the project bat will work in collaboration with the City for the portion of the Equestrians
trail in Auburn.The trail alignment will extend along the west bank of the Green River f�om S. Redestrians
277th St.,south to Brannan Park. From Brannan Park,the trail will then run south along M
Street SE to 22nd St"reef NE,where it will turn east towards Dykstra Park. It w'ill then cross
the river at the Dykstra foot bridge to the east bank of the river. It will then parallel Green
River Road and 104th Ave SE. Once across Lea H'ill Road SE the trail will follow 104Eh PL. SE
to the dead end. From the dead end the trail will follow the wooded bluff until it reaches a
_ _ _ ___ _
point opposite of Fenster Nature Park. At the alignment of 2nd St. SE the trail will cross at a
- -
future britlge location to the we_st side of the�iver and into Fenster Nafure Park. The trail will
continue south through the park and into the King County owned Aubarn Narrows area where
it w'ill end near the'intersecf'ion of Auburn Black Diamond Rd. and Green Valley Road.
-- __-- _._ _ -- _ _
This looped recreational path spurs offthe Interurban Trail and will go through'the Auburn Off-road Cyclists
Auburn Erivironmenfal Park. Pedestrians
Enyironment Equestrians,
al Park Loop possibly
White River The White River'Trail runs along the south side of the White River from Roegner Park to the Bicyclists
Trail eastern edge of Ga.me Farm Wilderness Pa�k. Future extensions of the trail are planned frqm Equestrians
A Street SE to Roegner Park,aaoss the White River via the future BNSF Railroad underpass, p{f-road Cyclists
on the south side of'the river within the City of Pacifie,and f�om Gaine Farm Wilderness Park. p��rians
to southeast Auburn along the 1Nhite River.
Cb��tr-r 3. LVorr-;l7ntnri�ec�7ians�or•lntrorr I'�z;e 3-14
ORD.E Page 251 of 751
�,�
C,T, �� B Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.I1= T�:1���
��� _� " wASHar�t�Tc�r�
. • � ,
. � .
-- -- - -
Williams These recreational trails are intended to use public or quasi-public lands, including utility Bicyclists
Trail corridors.A variety bf loop trails may be possible within this large area, Equestrians
Off-road Cyclists
PedesErians
Bonneville This east-west trail will extend from Lea Hillto Dykstra Park Sfreet;where it will eonnect to BicyclisFs
Power Trail downtown Auburn and West Hill via an existing and planned series of bike lanes. There Pedestrians
_ __ .
are topographical and environmental challenges that will need to be addressed du�ing the Eque.strians
design phase:
Academy The portion of Academy Drive from SR 164 to Green Valley Road is currently closed due to Bicyclists
Trail slope failures. Pedestrians
Fni iactrianc
Lakeland This trail serves the Lakeland community and links Sunset Park and Dorothy Bothell Park via Pedestrians
Hills Trail a meandering sidewalk path along Lakeland Hills Way SE. k.
This network will provide local and regional connections for a variety of non-motorized modes.
The completed portions of the Interurbari and Green River Trails eonnect pedestrians,cyclists,and
equestrians to areas north and south of Auburn,while the Wlute River Trail provides for east-west
travel.Additional bike lanes and compleuon of the paved trail network will guide cyclists safely to
points of interests and through congested areas of the Ciry.
'I'he eStablishment of an equestrian district and trails in the southeast portion of the Ciry permits
more opportunities for equestrian travel in scenic areas.
Pedestrians will be able to travel more safely and comfortably with upgrades and expansion of the
sidewalk network,new crossings and street lighting, and better sEreet design near schools and
frequendy traveled pedestrian locatibns.The addition of a BNSF undercrossing,just north of the
White River and west of A Street SE,will provide safe passage for pedestrians. A new trail
connection along C Street SW will provide pedestrians and cyclists with a safer connection to
downtown and Auburn Station.
Chafitcr 3. .i1�i�n-:1lataritcd 1 raiv��,7�rtio;t Prr�e�-I> �
ORD.E Page 252 of 751
�q a.
�,T�°F„ � ��_. = Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�
�''�'�---_�"'°� WASHINGTON
�:�;
_�.. � za ,�;�r�
:� � �
�- � �',
�� � � ��: ;
�y w� �1�i#� �iv�` �
n � >�� cny��c�� �
�������a� � � �
���f .�.� ��`F ��
�. � a... ; >
, .
�
k , � I
,x'
,,
�'�'� �' �� � � ' �^" . "
White River Trail
Nlulri-Use Path
PROMOTING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
The Ciry of Auburn envisions a transporta.rion system that will help prom.ote healthy communiry
principles by coordinating land use, the non-motorized transportation system, and transit in a
manner that encourages walking and bicycling.The Puget Sound Regional Council has identified
several elements,which contribute to the desirability of walking,bicycling, and transit use.l
■ Concentrating complementary uses such as restaurants,retail and grocery stores proximate to
residences and employment.
■ Liriking neighborhoods by connecring streets, sidewalks, and trails.
■ Designing for safe and welcoming pedestrian and bicycle faciliries.
■ Enharicing transit opportunities arid non-motorized aonnections to transit facilities.
■ Reducing and mirigaring the effects of parking.
These principles, rriany of which cap be promoted by thoughtful transportauon system.s planning,
encourage healthier communiries by increasing physical acriviry and decreasing air pollution caused
by vehiele ein'tssions. Auburirn has historically planned for a transporta..tion system that incorporates
many healthy community principles, such as transit faciliry planning and regional trail planning. In
addition, the Downtown Plan calls for a mixed-use, high densiry, pedestrian oriented downtown,
Improving the non-motorized system also helps address the findings of the citywide Health Impact
Assessment process which recommended that the Ciry improve sidewalk connectivity,improve the
pedestrian environment, eliminate natural and man-made mobiliry barriers for pedestrian and
bicyclists,improve transit access,improve traffic safety,pedestrian safery and personal security.
In the future,Auburn shall continue to promote these principles through long-range planning
efforts, capital faciliry improvements,development review,and community acriviries involving
active lifesryle elements. .
�Vision 2040 Update Issue Paper on Health:WhaYs He.alth Got to Do with Growth Management,Economic
Developme.nt and Transportation?,Puget Sound Regional Council,December 2nd,2004.
Cl�rz�ler•.3. Non-b'Joto�i�ed Ir�rnspa�talrar� 1'�r;e 3-1G
ORD.E Page 253 of 751
,` -.'
�aT��F - �-:P Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� : � � � .
—n� WASNlNGTON
IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
The Ciry has developed policies and identified funding strategies that will help implement the future
non-motorized network.They can b.e found in Chapters 5 and 6,consecutively,of thiS plan. The
planning direction outlined in this chapter shall be used as the foundation for implementing the
non-motorized policies and securing funding.
C'brr�ter3. Not2;1�1otori,�cd�I"rat�.r�i�r7�rtiora l��r�c3-17
ORD.E Page 254 of 751
r �
�:�.
r -��...
...Y%
�T
F
���, � r e �
; _ , �
- �. i: : ;;
�i i ..� -�� �� :
I �E , .
S 287TFY57 � � � � '
F S 6?H-S7'- �i�; _ _
— .w ' . .i , ' . -
:', � . . � ,y: .
.. : �. , � � . 90TM .
n Z .�. _ r : , J ?O � . .. . — ' �
,` � " .'O J. �� - . .
� .� _ - >s. �f� �- . �
. �� � �ST T � •
�� r: � � �,� , r — . .
� I67
�
p
? f �.
Y , � `�� . - 'Z� _ . 99THST�' r
� w
� �____ F � II��! � - � a
�� ��.
_�
s Msr� - ,-� . �I � ' � - +�'� �.� Q - . . ''.
�
, �_ ,_ _ � � � I` , a _; � _ L Q`..
I �
-� SE 30�T *
i �i� . �.^ � �ii�-,
' 3- - ' i II il . - -���. . . �....' _
� am.<.
.� —---.. � �' 4, _"�: � , .
� � „ : . �,x'g ��17fG; . � ,.:_
�•
' � n�.�W�-'.. ...,
r 3'i -- ,� r .. Y:r.) . ' . ,�, `� ,..:
�IC
_ � �C ' � _ �7. � _ �� r.
C �1 µ
� �� '� � � ��t�� . i
� k
„' -,� ��' 1. _— .i a 7 " � ' '+ - W '„�''r .
.W- .;i �.� -„ . . ¢�- � � . IB.
S 4TH 5 � � a ��; " � = S YSRD�PL -
. .. .i ,f4 �..\ `o . -__. .
`�.. � _
i i +.
„ � -i I
_ - _� h ; a7 �; �, .-��., -
, ^
rI . f` � ���� ; �'� i zwD*sr -
, 4THIST SW� r' I ..-1..+.{, �, ,
18 --
/ `• _ - -
8 ?►
. _ �
I 1 J � .
I `�i_ � �'` �
\ ', . . I .�`�` - G :M� � x. g
w � Y
" ��
l � , � , �� , tl ....-'.n�� . , � ___ �
I �f�= � zz srs� j —7---..
=� � i ��_, � _ , . i
' � ' .`� �
� � �. �5� ' sE -
m i - � _ —
� _ � . J"'�- `E"�" � . _. . .,- - �
�-.I.:. .:e''�✓' `� �
- t �
i � � _ -"'' '4'
-� /
��$���� STUGK RNEF Dit SE �:.-�� I
�. �� � �
:.�,., �, �
- u
i �'
I67 �
I , oe \
---_. I�J ,�C.a- e�f . \
` I
r Q�h Si'�SE y �1
�
� �� � � � [y � - ` � ' ' > \
� '�.,. � � ' �¢
w W .
� �.
- _ . , `i7i. . - � � >':� r�n
� . � , ,Q ' . ''Q. � '
. � _ ._ � �4�.� . . ¢ `iID; ll _ . .
Y PS a
`pZ� . 2ND ST E
a T
i r f
�I� v' 62N�E ��
� �
n��.N ST SE pN
t� . t {� t
1 `t�' �9 i �
w';QY,Wy.
f`,
,'�<q�l�� D
r:�tn 9T s
/
�
/ \ / �
�
� Pnonty Pomrc Petles[nan Corridor ���M��e��a^k����
Auburn Transportation Ptan
rx�:uo sm�w.aik: Ciryolqubum
s Existing Sidewalks and
r Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors
0 1 ea�<aso�Fa��re�. N n�eooiyc�n�eoea
MIIQS � �"�" � �o�ecteacrosswalxs
ORD.E """""`°`^�°'"" Pa e 255 of 751 Map 3-i
:
.�i
.,.�
,,,_
��......t...,...,,�
� �
I2 � 5pTH ST N
�� ~ �` � ���
i �
I : �� ,� L—_ � __,_■
�--I i - �'r�- ��P r■■Iy\■■.W ■
S 28TfH ST L�I Z 42ND ST NW : 42ND ST NE � S.ZB6TH ST : ' ��.♦ �
� i ■ •
SE 290TH� �
S 292ND ST ���A��� Q-J �
M1Yr����u�� Ar � s :
F
,2•� `�95T,�T uo.!I;;p�
����Od����' p .�.¢7LSm2
a 3 � i ■
i .167� z
i- ■ -/ 2 i ■ ■
��/��/ r � �Z' � ' S�99TH ST
2 ■ ■ ■ �
■ > ■ � � ■
■ 3 C � 1 ■ ��Y
S30�HST Z � � �W �■■ ■■■�.�A■u ru�m �� 7
� J ■ 2 ■ �
■ ti � > _ ■ I
� > > C � r�� � SE 307TF� a ■
7 �- ' ■z ■ ■ L r �
tn . d. � ■
W ■ �r�j �
�m ■
`'. r. F iST�T Nw ?i<' ■■ ....,e.r.',.■.■■.�
� 3 � � ����by i =
z Y�
����� ■ L ■ � ■ .
: � . z a .�` ■ sE sisTH� .
� N i d w ■ .
`— � • u ����lqlfi �� . W L��idpYNYw���'
o ■� � � a
�i�. 5 324TH S■ � , � z •.\_� o SE 323RD PL I 8"
� � � � � �:��
� � o c,
� • •
■ �
a�h��A� � ' ST �
.. � 4THSTSW 4TH�TSE � �p�".
'; I$ ; ��: � �■ � ' �masa �*i.,�
� BTHSTSE +� Ck��AMQn�Rf!'�Y��� ��
�= I
� :
■
� tSTH St Sw F ■ � S�F�YiC 1�•
� __ - N ■ ■ QP ■
, : m ` ,'ITNST sm �
� � \ ■
■ ■
� : 2 DSTSEr —+��
■
■ � I .
m W �5TH S�� i7H SI�E ♦�
� r J
� F N • ■ \
� j � � �/ ,�,1i�6,sisiJ�.� 9GBG Y7 �
�- �
� �w� ��
S+� �9
�� ��.. 3 D ST STUCK RIVER DR SE�A` s ~�:
S ♦
y 3 r+SZ �� .�p51HWAY5
�����\\� � �� �
5j � �
�._ y� 4,�5 � �o�
,I 67 ¢
P oQ-
� ���� ���� �
� .�� ' t l
�M�`� P Q�rh ST SE �• `
O� � � ■
. ��Q � \
♦ .
� ��R�of�i*ilill�sl��iu�s���e6 W �L \
��� ��� ¢ ■ O i
� ����HSTSE �e p �>���ll�m�tfmlP
D �� p� d
N 2ND ST E �
� m
< �'
� !�
ST SE
< 6i
5 c
Z g4iH ST �
m �
SE �
��
Q
� ST S
� E.,=�,�sT�=+�he,d= ��Mi«O F����eB�k<Fa�����v � Pa�k� Aubum Transportation Plan
Existing and Future Bicyde Facilities
and Mul[i-Use Trails
O 1 • FuwreTrailneads � IIail Ciryafauoum
Miles
� e��Fa��ury �AM�.,_,S" v�,o��.�t.,,�i Mdp 3�2
ORD.E Pa e 256 of 751
.
. ��� ,„
,� �.,,, �.�,
Aent
x
scu�cic
!
� �
■ 1'0 �
� --a-2773i+SF—
'V � 6ent 1'0
t'rd.r.i i Z 5o7HS7NE ♦ ti���
Nll♦ � � i- �
� � y ���
� � � SE 282ND S
i aP,
i •
� S 287TH 5T �1 � � qpND ST NW w <3RO ST NE SE 2%TH ST
, E � ,
� N a� � s
w . w
S 292ND 5T � P� w � a
�� > ! p
� II a Z
• Z �y ^
■ ~ N
'I'u Q ■ II T �O �
frJeral F � �1�7,- • II '/� 2
��Y h , ~
� /L\�2' �m SE 2fl9TH ST �
�, Z . u.��' ;',Ix�.x1. ,u�l��
> �
� �0�/
5 305TH ST 3 = � �'"'^<.., . � ~ �,a':� ' SE H ST w �
Z w �� . Z g �, o�ir r �n �I'ncific
m � C ,.�..i,� � . � N d' � � Naa<n�ay.
� � �,,` �._w��,y�i , a a
� . i 3 �' SE 307T L = I ►
� . � A�' ¢ li 2 11giSTNE �
K o �
W 0 il.�', � �
Z �!SE T��I�y _ a n,,,�...,,
r u�i ■ �� ' w e�no�n°'a`
+ 3 � i ` �
z ■ o f
r s � � SE 3t6TH ST �
m !
■ �
3 • Z II �Q�
! t-
FeJeral ��i U BTHSTNE y SE320THS
< < a R w r�
µa, �, Q r ����,, �
� S 324TH ST �� � � w r SE 323RD� � �� N�s_ u�uun u n a
e m �� � � o wc;�
� - e■. `.� �n `n
� �_i ��«`:� •�, '_ .
�6'�; e . p:. •
.'N�S7'S�
nrH sT sw� '`�,,�f„ cr si�_ ' \
� `
ISi
ti :'��',, f T S�'SE" � Ck DIAMDND RQS[L
y ; ��. ■
3 ■ .,,. ��, I
d ,°""'",`.` �I � ��1,
\ m • ,�1
�� i
urH st sw • � m � Sceti
� U j � /co
_ �T�i sT sE �
�'' I ' ^�J, � �m \� I
j� 23RD ST SE �� Z �
� O �j w ZSTH 5T E � 4^
' � �/ m w F `�90 — 1 u
I I- N N� Ftil� 4lnminr
a w � �RSE c:ey�rr .►
� w ¢� 29TH ST SE �
�
�
c^Mi �
�
S i UCK RNER OR SE �
S�
i�� � N S� 357HWAY5
� i- O
�'� �
lJgewuoJ $- I �y<SE I
� \
e
� 167 — w 4,
� N h�
I N Q fo
m � Bnumrlxw
ti.�' � �
Q,� Q�rh 5T SE
O W \
�
>
. . � 515�SS w w \
I N
Q o �
� N'TH ST SE �
g�7 R SE �
�n a
h1i11�un ly , 2NDST[
� � �
�� gpND ST SE
�
� 6qtH5�5E
�_\ /
ax�.�. �,� � Tn
� � 72N� - � � eunney
I.n4r
? �
ln
Tu �u �
5umnrr .C'
lo & Iti�nne�
Incoma Pucalluy I.uAc-
� � �
!'+S
�°� Connectors �; Focusnrea Aubum Transportation Plan
Bicyde Corridors and Connectors
^/ Corridors
0 1
��������� Interurban Trail
Miles
M�p 3-3
ORD.E � � °ty°r""�°�° Pa e 257 of 751
C��Y°�. _ Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.����.�T
- 14ASN(NGTON
C�A���� � --
T� ; �
�ID...
;;��� `xs '
'�`�,-,'�„
Transit service is a key component of Auburn's �d-�"� `.., � `
���F,:.� �_�
transportarion system, providing mobiliry within the � � ��� �`���� $ �``t' .���:� ����
Ciry and access to and from the City. Unlike the
r
street and rion-motorized systems, Auburn does not k +� ���� � �
directly administer transit service. Rather, the C,ity .�,�,�,�i ��' ,�WW���£""""'�� �
works with local transit agencies to coordinate r ����� � � �'�� ��� 3�`���
serviee in Auburn. The transit agencies are publicly '� ` ' ` , � ��'�
.�.sx a c k � q, 'i .E€ k... �5'.
funded and are� responsible for providing transit ` ' ��a��'� ��'"' ��� °°�` �� ''��
service within their service boundaries.
Auburn Station
Today, Auburn is served by local and regional bus,
as well as a commuter ra'il line that runs between Seattle and Tacoma/Lakewood.
�.1 NEEDS AS:�E�S EIVT
EXISTIIVG TRANSIT SERVICES
The following seetion provides a brief summary of the public transportation services offered in
Auburn. Existing transit service for tlie Auburn area is identified in Map 4-1 at the end of this
secrion.
KING COUNTY IVIETRO TRANSIT
Bus Service
Metro Trarisit provides local bus services linking desunations within the communiry and ,
providing regional connections to the Auburn Station and the 1-5th Street NW Park-and-Ride.
Metro Transit offers the following services in Auburn:
Route 1.54 provides weekday service between the Auburn Station, the 15th Street NW Park-and-
Ride;the Kent Station,Boeing in Kent, the Tukwila Park-and-Ride,Boeing Field, and the Federal
Center South in Seattle.
Route 164 provides regional service between Kent, Auburn and the Green River College. It
connects with the Route 181 at Green Riyer College.
Route 180 provides service daily between southeast Auburn, Auburn Station, arid Kent Starion,
connecting to Route 150, with service to Seatde. Route 180 also serves Sea-Tac Airport and the
_ , . Burien Transit Center.
_� ��� �.'�; � �
��"�"`� � p� � Route 181 provides daily service between the Twin
Lakes Park-and-Ride, Sea-Tac Mall, Federal Way
Transit Center, the Oudet Collection, Auburn
� � �t, ,� � �„�
Station,and Green River College.
� � Route 186 provides weekday peak hour service
�� � �``� `��� `�'"''�� '�' between the Auburn Station and Enumclaw via
E
, �� ��s�� �•� �� � ��
���� � ' ��� ��€ ` . �
� � �� � ,
�
3
� �� 3,� ��� 3�
� � ...�.., ��.� � 3�� �� �tl ��4 ����
�, ��rd�., k... ,��1 � �� �,�...� a�e�- �
s�..f. ..sa;�t�. 3.�, � -
ORD:E Metro Transit Hyb�id Articulated Bus Page 258 of 751
Courtesy.•Metro Transit
��Tt°� -" � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.T�.T��L:T��oT
� �� � W.4SH11�,'GTOt�
Auburn Way South. The service is scheduled to meet Sounder Commuter Rail trains at the
Auburn Station.
Route 915 provides weekda.y midday service and some weekend service between the Aubum
Station and Enumelaw via Auburn Way South. The rou.te also includes a small portion of Dia1 a
Ride Transit (DAR'I� serviee with lirriited,variable rouring in response to rider requests,
Route 917 provides weekday and Saturday service between A Street�SE, 41 st Street SE, Algona,
the Oudet Collecrion, and the Auburn Stauon. Peak hour weekday service is also provided
between the Auburn Station and the Social Securiry Administrauon and the General Services
Administration (GSA).. The route offers DART serviae (limited variable route) in portions of
Pacific.
Route 952 is a weekday AM and PM peak hour route specifically designed to serve the Boeing
Everett facility. It operates from the 15th Street NW Park and Ride to the Boeing Everett Plant.
Route 910 is a DART route whieh was inaugurated in Oetober 2010 in a partnership between
Auburn and King County Metro Transit,and functions as a community shuttle circulator service.
The route provides weekday and Saturday service between north central Auburn, the I Street NE
corridor,downtown Auburn and the Outlet Collecrion/YMCA on 15th Street SW.
Due to financially driven cuts by Metro Transit, Rou.te 919 wa.s recently diseontinued.. This was a
communiry focused route� which operated fixed route and some dial a ride service betoveen
downtown Auburn, the Library, Senior Center, Les Gove Park and southeast Auburn in the
Dogwood area where it interchanged with the Muckleshoot Tribal Shutde. Although service to
the area is still availa.ble on th.e Routes 186 and 915, Route 919 operated during the off-peak
hours filling gaps in the service offered by the Routes 186 and 915.
ACCE3S
ACCESS Transportation is a King Counry Metro paratransit service, providing door-to-door,
shared-ride van transportation within most of King County. The Americans with Disabiliries Act
(ADA) requires curb-to-curb paratransit service for persons whose disabilities prevent use of
accessible non-commuter, fixed route bus service. T'his service is intended to offer a comparable
level of service to that provided by regular bus service.
_ :��� - - Vanpool Services
� � �.,
�..
�� j ," Metro Transit sponsors vanpool services that serve
A� ���,;���� �
�: .�� residents and employees in Auburn. Vanpool is a
�
��, � ��� "� shared-ride serviee that provides group transport for
" '�-��� �� '�"�� commuters with proximate origins and destiriarions.
Vanpool is a popular and flexible service that
� �� �, � ��, � � ;� �� provides commuters with �an alternarive to driving
�� �= .. _
�� ,;��=���� alone and fixed-route transit service. Vanpool �will
continue to be an important strategy for mirigating
_x.�~`- peak period congesrion throughout Auburn and the
.::.�� .
..._.�- region,
DART�ehic%
Courtesy:`City ofKent
C.�iapter 4. L ran.rit Puge 4-2
ORD.E Page 259 of 751
C.1TYt"�f . � -"��
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.l�t..�$T,:���
- WASNINGTC)N
Metro Transit Facilities
Metro Transit owns and operates the Auburn 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride with 244 surface
parking stalls. Metro also operates into the Auburn Station managed by Sound Transit.
Additionally, Metro maintains approximately 177 other bus stops in Auburn, 42 of which contain
passenger shelters.
Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)
Under state law, the City is required to administer a Commute Trip Reduction program for all
employers in Auburn with at least 100 employees arriving during the peak moriiing commute
hours. The Ciry of Auburn contracts with Metro Transit to provide CTR support services for the
CTR affected local employers. Currently, there are 10 CTR erriployers in Auburn with a total of
5�500 employees, Metro Transit assists employers in complying with state law by providing
rideshare support and a host of other incentives aimed at reducing single oecupant vehicle travel,
PtERCE TRANSIT
Route 497 is operated by Pierce Transit in partnership with the Ciry of Auburn,arid King Counry
Metro Transit. It operates peak hour weekday service between Lakeland Hills and the Auliurn
Station. As a morning and evening service meering, Sounder trains the 497 is a commuter -
oriented route, but is open to all riders. In the future; the Ci:ry hopes to expand the Route 497 to
serve all peak hour Sounder trips. Because Route 49Z primarily serves Sounder passengers and
because it signifcantly reduces the demand for commuter parking at the Auburn Station parking
garage inanaged by Sound Transit the ciry is seeking financial parricipation from Sound Transit in
operating this route and making this a permanent route.
Vanpool Services are provided by Pierce Transit -- -
similar to those offered by King Counry Metro
Transit.
SOUND TRANSIT
Sound Transit is the regional transit provider for _ ��
_,.�_�'�� .: .. �. �
Puget Sound. It provides limited stop, transit `� _ . ��'.������
services� linking Auburn to major regional ��,�� ��� ����"'�
�,,��
_b :� �- � ,
destinations in King and Pierce Counties. The � ` � �
agenc�y offers both Sounder cominuter rail and ��� � �� � ��. � =
regional express bus services in Auburn. N�`��, ry
Sounder Commuter Rail --
Sound Transit operates the Sounder commuter rail Sounder Train
service on the Lakewood=Tacoma — Seatde route Couitesy.'Sound T�ansit
via the BNSF Railway. Sound Transit provides -
weekday peak hour trips northbound to Seatde in � � � '"�" ��� ��
� �;��
the AM and southbound from Seattle to Tacoma - `� ¢'��� � � �'$: �
Lakewood in the PM. Reverse direction trips a�re �,��� �� �
� , �� ���"
also provided in each peak hour with mid=day �
service being planned for future years. Some
,.
_ ' �,�.� .�� '
Cbapter 4. 'I raTa.czt
� �- .,.
� �
ORD.E Sound Transif Regiona/Express B �d 60 of 751
Courtesy.�Sound Transit
��ry�_--� �� %�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
,��-�����
connecrions are available between south line Sounder Erains which terminate in Seattle and north
line Sounder trains from Everett to Seattle. Addirional special event service to a.nd from Seattle
for Ma.riners, Seahawks and Sounders games and the Emerald Downs racetrack in Auburn is
offered on some weekends.
Currendy, eight trains operate northbound to Seattle in the morning peak and return southbound
during the PM peak. Two trains operate southbound to Tacoma/Lakewood in the morning a.nd
northbound to Seattle in the early evening.
Regional Express Bus Service
Route 566/567 offers daily weekday, limited stop service between the Aubum Starion the Kent
Station,the Renton Transit Center,the Bellevue Transit Center, and the Overlake Transit Center.
Route 577/578 offers daIly limited stop service between Puyallup; Sumner,Auburn, Federal Way
and Seattle> The 577 provides service between the Federal Way Transit Ceriter and Seatde during
the peak periods when the Sounder trains are in op.eration. The 578 provides service between
Puyallup and Seattle during the off-peak hours when train service is not currently provided.
Transit Facilities
Sound Transit owns and operates the Auburn Starion located in dowritown Auburn. This full
service multi-modal facility provides parking for a total of 633 vehicles in a 6-story parking garage
and a surface parking lot. The facility currentily handles appro�cimately 470 daily bus Erips.
Approximately 3,000 passengers ride bus _service to/from the station on a daily basis. Boardings
at Auburn on Sounder commuter rail are 1,300 per day.The faciliry draws numerous transit riders
from outside Auburn including many from outside the Sound Transit ta�ung District, the
geographir area where residents contribute tax revenue to fund Sound Transit.
Ch�r�iter 4. Trart.rit Pg,;e 4-4
ORD.E Page 261 of 751
����°�Y�� ������ �������� Comprehens�ive Transportati�on Plan
��� ������ ���
-�.
- v w�S�-�tr���-c>��
. rart�it ser ee��
DEMOGRAPHICS
People use public transportation for two reasons: because they have to ride or because they
choose to ride. Carrying the choice rider, such as eommu..ters, often has the greatest positive
impact on the uansportation system by helping control peak hour traffic demand: But providing
a "safery net" of adequate transportation to those who absolutely depend on it is,arguably;public
transportation's most im.portant role.
There are a numtier of ways to identify "transit dependeriey" but the most effective way is to
idenrify locations with high concentrations of residents who have no vehicle available in their
household. An examination of the most recent year 2000 Census data available from the Bureau
of the Census shows that some areas of Auburn have a surprisingly high number of households
with no vehicle available. This remains the most recent information available with the level of
detail necessary to idenufy needs on a block level. As a comparison baseline, 9 percent of Auburn
households have no vehicle ayailable; this percentage is consistent with that of King County (9
percent) and slightly Higher than that of Pierce Counry (8 percent). For the purpose of this
analysis,block groups with signif cant concentrations of residential development in which over 12
percent of households have no vehicle available are considered transit dependent areas. There are
eleveri eensus block groups in Auburn in whieh over 12 percent of households have no vehicle
available, nine of which have significant concentrations of residential development and are
therefore identified as transit dependent areas. It is also notable that four of the nine block
groups with large concentrations of residential development have at least 20 percent of
households with no vehicle available. The nine block groups comprising the tra.nsit dependent
areas had a total of 3,698 households in 2000, 771 (21 percent)af which had no vehicle available.
Map 4-2 shows the transit dependent areas and overlays the exisring transit service in order to
identify if adequate transit service is availa.ble to these highly transit dependent neighborhoods.
Comparing the neighborhoods in question to the transit route structure; it is apparent that the
vast majority of Auburn's most transit dependent population lives within '/a miles of a fixed route
bus = the distance standard most often identified by the transit industry as a reasonable walking
distance to transit. An exception to that rule is the area near pogwood Street SE north of
Auburn Way South where many of the transit dependent residents are located rrmore tlian '/a inile
from fixed route bus service.
_ . .
In the future, it will be¢ritical to ensure these areas continue to be well covered by transit service,
both in terms of route and schedule coverage.
SERVICE COVERAGE
Generally speaking, local transit service coverage in Auburn is well planned and well operated.
Eyen so there are some areas of the community that do not have adequate local service coverage;
as well as some important regional bus links and commuter rail services that have yet to be fully
developed.
Local Bus Service
Chaj�ter 4. Tran.rrt Page s�-S
ORD.E Page 262 of 751
..� « „�
��TX°F, * � � :° Comprehensive Transportation Plan
����.��
--� wAs�Hi,�v�ror�
Some of Auburn's most populated neighborhoods are deficient in local bus service,including the
West Hill, Lakeland Hills during the non-peak hours, and parts of east and nortYi Auburn. Tlie
least served residential area of Auburn is West Hill, an area with approximately 5,000 residents
with no transit service. Lakeland Hills, a planned residential communiry with appro�cimately 3,800
homes has peak hour service to downtown Auburn but lacks all day service. Lea Hill, a
predominantly residenrial communiry on Auburn's east hill, does liave t�vo uansit routes, which
predominandy serve Green River College, leaving a large poruon of the residenes unable to walk
to a transit route. In 2014, a license plate survey of the Auburn Station garage indicated a
substanrial number of Lea Hill residents utilize transit service at Auburn Starion. This suggests
that a commuter oriented shuttle serving Lea Hill, similar to the Route 497 shutde iriiplemented
in Lakeland Hills,could be successful.
Additionally, residential areas of east Auburn, east of M Street NE and south of 8th Street NE,
and parts of northeast Auburn, east of I Street NE, are also located more than '/a mile from fixed
route bus service. It is difficult for these areas to access transit;both for local and regional trips.
The design of King Counry Metro's local bus routes in Auburn should be reviewecl in relation to
future changes in Sound Transit's Sounder commuter rail and regional express bus services to
ide.nrify opportuniries and prioriries for productive im.provements to transit cove.rage, frequency,
and hours of operation.
Regional Bus Service
The most important unmet regional transit need is for all day, express bus and commuter rail
service between Aubu.rn,Tacoma/Lakewood and Seattle:, While the original Sound Transit I�egional
E�res.c Bu.c Seruice Plarr contained a direet link between Auburn and Taeoma/Lakewood, tlie
connection was discontinued in Sound Transit's later service plans.
Sounder Commuter Rail
Sou.nder Commuter Rail, a highly popular and � " � ` - �
��
attractive service, operates bi-directionally in the
peak periods. Most of the trips are operated in the
peak direction; northbound during Ehe weekday ,
AM peak and southbound during the weekday °� ,. �.; � „
PM peak. No midday, evening or weekend � -
regular service is currently provided. These �� ����� ��� ��� "'��'�� ��;,:���� ,��� �� '
services are needed as is additional capac�ity o� ���� "��� ��'' �" � "" ���� �
- - n ;��� ���
some of the currendy most popular runs.
Intercity Passenger Rail
Auhurn is an ideal location for a future stop on
the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor, which runs Auburn YMCA -Major trip generator
from Vancouver, BC to Eugene, OR. A former
intercity passenger rail stop and Amtrak cary, Auburn is ceritrally located i_ri South King County at
the inter"secrion of SR-18 and SR-167 and is a 10 minute drive from I=S. The Auburn Station is
the only faciliry in King or Pierce Counry with direct freeway access and currendy serves over
3,000 bus passengers and 1,300 commuter rail passengers and is centrally located within 10 miles
C`iapter 4. Tran.rit Page 4-6
ORD.E Page 263 of 751
������- - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� �: � ����
was r�t r�c�rc�r�
of 500,000 people. Amtrak should implement more intercity rail stations in the high density and
traffe congested areas of Puget Sound such as at Auburn Station. A new Auburn stop would
liave great ridership benefits since it is at a station with available overnight parking and is in close
pro�mity to hundreds of thousa.nds of potential new customers. Furthermore the projected
schedule impacts of a stop in Auburn could be largely absorbed in the overall route schedule.
TRANSIT SCHEDULING
The scheduling of transit service is often as important as route alignment and coverage in
deterxnining the success of the service.
Scheduling to Successfully Serve Employers
One of the most overlooked aspects of trans.it system design is scheduled transit arrival times
versus major employer shift times. While a transit system can physically serve the front door of a
bu.siness, its actual scheduled arrival times wi11 often determine if anyone rides the system: It is
not the intention of this effort to conduct an exhaustive employer shift time analysis of the
community. However, an example of the challenge cari be found in examining one of Aubum's
major employers, the Boeing Company with over 6,000 employees. The company's primary
morning shift time arrival occurs at 6 AM, the earliest southbound Sounder train from Seatde,
arrives in Auburn at 6:41 AM.'The first run of the day for tlie Metro Route 181 from Federal Way
and Lea Hill arrive near Boeing at approximately 6 AM, making it difficult for employees to meet
the shift time. The first runs of the Route 917 which serve the nearby GSA and SSA offices arrive
after the Boeing shift time as well. None of the e�sting bus routes stop close enough to the
Boeing faciliry to allow employees to walk to the faciliry.TYiis shows how it would be beneficial to
coordinate with major eipployers to offer alternate transit options that can meet various shift
rime.s such as dedicated Vanpools or Vanshares.
The lack of transit schedule synchronization with key employers in a community can also
negarively impact other opporturiities. The City of Auburn in partnership with Metro Transit was
the first agency in Puget Sound to create the concept of`Van Share', a specialized transit serviee
in which vanpools carry employees to their employer's front door from regional transit centers.
Where the schedules work, sueh as in providing a direct link between Boeing's Renton facilities
and the Tukwila Stauon, the concept has been highly successfiil. On the other end of the trip, the
Van Share concept can be successfully implemented to transport employees between their homes
and the Transit Station, saving capaciry on the roadway and at tlie Auburn Station parking
facilities.
Due to the fact that Auburn's major employer shift times sometimes don't match Sounder and
regional bus transit arrival times, Van Share has not yet aehieved its full potential in Auburn.
However as Sounder and bus service to the Auburn Station increase this option may become
more viable for major employers in Auburn.
To maximize the investment in public transit service in Auburn, it is recommended that both
Sound Transit and Metro Transit conduct ari evaluation of their schedules with a focus on
improving service to major employers in the Auburn area.
Chaj�ter 4. T'rairsit Pdge 4-7
ORD.E Page 264 of 751
�
��TY�� - .��£T ��� - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
..,�.�� �b���:�
.�T" . . w,�sH��€crr��v
Transit Capacity
A seeond consi.deration in scheduling service is ensuring that.eriough serviee is available to meet
tlie demand.
Sounder Commuter Rail has also been immensely popular, indicating that increased service is
supported b.y the ridership demand. Daily Sounder boardings at south end stations total around
6,000 riders, the equivalent of a lane of traffic on SR 167 or I-5, emphasizing the importance of
expanding Sounder service.
The Aubum Starion is a highly successful component of the Sounder service. Total rail b:oardings
at the Auburn Starion today average over 1,300 riders per day making Auburn one of the busiest
stations on the Sounder route.
URBAN DESIGN
'The deSign of the build environment has direct implica..tions on the quali.ry and availabili:ry of
transit service. Urban design can either encourage or inhibit the provision of local transit service.
Some inhibitors to providing neighborhood service include inadequate street geometry and
construction, lack of a satisfactory location for a terminal at the end of the route, absence of a
street grid that eould be used to turn around a bus, and the absence of a conneeted sidewalk
network. Ideally; new residential developments should be laid out with future transit route
alignments in mind and supporting transit facilities. Likewise, retrofits of the existing street
network should accommodate transit design eonsiderations,
IMPROVING �OCAL SERVICE
Preserving the Route 910
Since 2010 Auburn and Metro Transit have partnered tlirough the Transit Now initiarive to
implement community shuttle circulator service. The Route 910 shuttle serves Northeast Auburn
commercial and activity areas. The serviee has become steadily rnore popular, doubling in
productiviry since its inception. This partnership route between, Auburn and King Counry Metro
has now been extended until 2020.
Add Service to Replace the Terminated Route 919
Currendy, a planned expansion of service to the Metro Route 915 is expeeted to begin in Mar¢h
2016. This will increase service to hourly, midday on some of the alignment of the former Route
919. The city should continue to look for opportunities to improve service along the route of the
former 919.
Preserve and Expand Commuter Connection Bus Routes
Auburn should work with Pierce Transit, Metro Transit and Sound Transit to add service to the
Route 497 to meet all existing and future Sounder trains and to encourage Sound Transit to fund
a portion of the Route 497.
Auburn should explore the concept with Metro Transit and Sound Transit of adding a new
commuter bus service to Sounder from Lea Hill and the west hill of Auburn and encourage
Sound Transit to fund a portion of the routes. Similar to the Route 497, these routes would be
Ghapter4. Trarr.cit Page 4-8
ORD.E Page 265 of 751
C.iTY C)F � ' .. �a,ti=
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
. _ t..J
�-�-_ " wnsH�hcTnU
rimed to meet Sounder trains and operate on a direct route and express schedule after leaving the
Lea Hill or west hill areas.
TRANSIT FACILITIES
One type of transit facility improvement stands out as the most important ongoing need:
parking. Comparing the number of current Sounder daily boardings (1,300) to the available
number of parking stalls at the Aubu.rn Station (633) and the number of passengers who transfer
daily from bus to Sounder (approximately 150) sKows there is a lack of parking for Sounder at the
Auburn Station. Additional train trips are currently being planned, including three new round
trips, and these will attraet more ridership (and result in more parking needs) in downtown
Auburn.
Although there is always a desire to have as many people as possible access commuter rail without
parking, the reality of the service is that it is usually used by customers who want to start and end
their day with a direct, fast trip to and from the station. OnTy the Route 497 is specifically
designed to link commuters to Sounder. It accounts for the majority of transfers b:etween bus
service and rail service. Given the strength of the demand for Sounder and the location of many
of its users, other lifesryle choices (bike, pedestrian or TOD) will also not be sufficient to
ulEimately negate tlie continued demand for more parking:
So, for the foreseeable future, parking will be a continuing challenge at the Auburn Starion and
even more will be needed as three more Sounder roundtrips are added, as scheduled in 2016 and
201`7.
Building the infrastructure to accommodate commuter parking demand is an essential component
of making transit an ateractive option for aommuters.. In order to do so, action is essential to
clearly identify the future demand and acquire the land needed to build the parking. The plans
created in ST2 and ST3 (ST2 is the Sound Transit Plan approved by voters during 2008, ST3 is a
proposed ballot measure for voters to consider in 2016) to build parking should be followed. If
this is not done, neighborhoods within walking distance of Auburn Sta.tion, particularly those
bordering W Main Street, w'ill experience an increase in on-street commuter parking, rnaking it
difficult for residents to find parking during the day and early evening. To combat tliis issue, the
Ciry has established a restricted parking zone for residents to the west of C Street NW, however
the problem may b.egin in other locauons. Sound Transit should also exainine the usage of the
Auburn Station garage by people who live outside the Sound Transit Taxing District. The ageney
should consider requiring those users to pay to park in the Auburn Station garage. In a 2014
survey of the vehicles parked at the Auburn facility over 90 vehicles (15 percent of the parking
supply) were registered at addresses outside the Sound Transit Ta�ung District.
King County Metro Transit is responsible for installing new and maintaining existing bus shelters
in Auburn. Both the City and agency should continue to prioritize potential improvements to
shelters, benches, pads, bus zones, customer information and pedestrian access. Currently; about
20 Metro bus stops that meet warrants for the installation of shelters have not received them yet
and Ciry staff is focused on working with Metro to aceomplish that installation.
Pedestrian improvements around existing or planned transit stops,including enhanced crosswalks
and pedestrian refuges, should also be.examined by the Ciry. The placement of bus stops is driven
Chu�ter 4. 'Traiuit Puge 4-9
ORD.€ Page 266 of 751
# d�
C1T��� ' �: � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�..�.� � U ..:� �. �
�`��k,.� WASH11'GTC�N
by a variery of criteria including transit system operating and design standards, professional engi-
neeririg field evaluation,and public iriput.
�a� ! 9iS�l��� ���7��9l9 ���.r�,�i0�0�.r�iA�����Y�
This section contains the recommendations derived from the transit needs assessment, as
discussed in the first part of this chapter: Recommendarions are organized by lead agency, with
the understanding that implementation of any major system improvement will require the
collaboration of many agencies.
KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT
Maintain the operation of the Route 910 in partnership with Metro Transit. Explore partnering
with Metro Transit and the Muckleshoot Indian tribe to create a new route combining Ehe best
features of Ehe former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shuttle to provide better trarisit service to the
city and the Reservation.
Work with Metro Transit to create new, limited stop AM and PM peak transit services designed
for commuters from Lea Hill and west hill to and from the downtown Auburn Station.
Conduct an evaluation of transit schedules;improve service to major employers.
Work with Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains.
_.. . .
Explore, assist and encourage the implementation of commuter Vanpool and Uan Share linking
Boeing to the Auburn Station.To meet Sounder and Regional bus routes.
Work with Sound Tran.sit a.nd Metro Transit to create additional parking at or near the Auburn
Station:
PIERCE TRANSIT
Work with Pierce Transit to add serviee to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains.
SOUND TRANSIT
Work with Sound Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains and fund
a portion of the Route.
Work with Sound Transit to add new commuter bus service to the Sounder from. Lea Hill and
West Hill and fund a porrion of the "routes:
Institute midday Sounder service to and from Tacoma/Lakewood and Seattle and plan for
everiing and weekend service in the near future.
Address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Starion due to the use of the overcrowded
Sounder parking fa.ciliry by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound Transit taxing district and
pay nothing for the faciliry.
Begin working with the City of Auburn to create addirional parking near the Auburn Starion, as
specified in ST2 and included in ST3,which is scheduled to be on the November 2016 ballot.
CITY OF AUBURN
Conrinue the operation of the Route 910 in partnership with Metro Transit.
Chrr�ter 4. T'run..nt Page 4=10
ORD.E Page 267 of 751
_ *y.�`
��TY��r .. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
__ U= � .
�. wr,s�ln,c.��-C��
Explore partnering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to create a new route combining the best
features of the former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shutde to provide better transit service to the
City and the Reservation.
Work with Metro Transit and Sound Transit to create a new, limited stop AM and PM peak
transit service for commuters from Lea Hill and west hill to and from the Auburn Station.
Work with Pierce Transit and Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more
Sounder trains and encourage Sound Transit tq fund a portion of the Route 497 to continue the
route in service for multiple years beyond 2016.
Work with Sound Transit to address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Station due to the
use of the overcrowded Sounder parking facility by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound
Transit taxing district and pay nothing for the facility.
Begin working with Sou.nd Transit and Metro Transit in partnership to create additional
commuter parking at or near the Auburn Station.
Chaj�ter 4. Tra�zsit Pa;e�t- 11
ORD.E Page 268 of 751
i �
�
.�/�s
�„/
T
��—tr2,=�-FH-S�T— •
Z 56TH ST NE
( ���
,�
�P
�
S 287TH ST -N+ 42ND 5T NW 42ND ST NE SE 286TH ST � �
_� �
I u�._
? SE290TH ST w
S 292ND ST w Q-� ¢
. 37TH ST NW � O2 � �
ti �
y m 2� �9STH$T y � =
�O
�r 167 i 2�
� �- 2' SE 299TH ST
N m O /V'
Z m ' _ J
S 305TH ST 3 � � . ., � z p�.'r'�P1 w S H 5T w )))
Z N /
y � � 4 Q j I
> > � h t SE 30]T � `�
i
~ N f
> W Vj � �
> � W
= w � SE 312TH S
r- z Q
N �- tiT
� � N $ �
Z -
r
N
3 � m
-- 8TN S w
m
w
>
w <
5 324TH ST � Z � o SE 323FD PL �
m � �- _
�
O
W MAW Si
� 2ND ST S
>
� �STSW qTHSTSC
� .I 8 N 9UB�RN e
� 8 HST �i CK�IAMQNOR�SE�•
i �
y -� S�fN�
— — —� � T. °o
� " � ���� �n
�� 22f005TSE �\
�� �� ��♦
Q w
� � �
> ST SE � �IW�� 26TH ST SE
�
� � � � o ��MY�R
� Sf l
� � �.
� y � STUCK RIVER DR SE
, rn w uFi H`'j 5 S
, � rn p 36S 35TN`NAY
� U gt SE
�— yt
167 41
y� y�
II a��`�� ,�ti
� �� � oQP .F� Q�H Si SE W
Rs �n
� FY �
�q a
I, 515Z ST rSF y w
� \
I W Vl
S6THSTSE a O
`, ¢
5 E—p
� 2N�ST E P a
Iyy
�F
� � 62NDSTSE
�
641H ST SL 65TH ST S
—�I m
� ��y 5� Q
<A K
osTs
* Auburn Transit S[a[ion ^/ MeVo Transit Rou[es Auburn Transportation Plan
Auburn Transi[ Routes
� Park @ Ride ^/ Pierce Transit Routes dnd MIT Shu[[le Route
� � � City ofAuburn ^ / Sound Transit Routes
i v
Miles .
: �� �� Muckteshoot Shuttle Routes
ORD.E Pa e 269 of 751 Map 4-1
:
.�.�
...y ;;
--s����N�s�—� T
� 507H ST NE
c�
� � ���
Jrv SE 262ND S
��P
0
� S 287TH ST � qpND ST NW 42ND ST NE SE 286TH ST
�
�2 SE290THST Q ..
5292ND ST 37TH ST NW �"
� �O= S�, Z
N
� m 2� �STH ST � �
�o �a �
r Q67- 3 Q'
� z 2
,^� F �' SE 299TH ST
N �O ^
Z m /�
w > -1 l
ti I
y x 3 ? � � , � Z o-���P N S H 57 w f
W 9 2
a F � � . "� w > a
m
= u' > j �. � w s SE 307T L x
N � N F
w y � m
3 � w
� w � SE 312TH S
� z Q
N F F
3 a m
Z o �
Z ���
r rf �.
h
3 z
s
-ar � j� �_,. _.... - m
w
\
>
S 3?4TH ST � �% / . ti ���- � SE 323RD PL 1 I 8
J-' o
.. .. � �'���� `
. ...,.,i._� i
� 2ND ST S
>
2 ��iT Sy9 4l'H�ST��. � .
� � 18 � ��B�RN'el
� '�ST �' y CK��AMONO RD SE�
� � �
w
S�En/i
— — . �� � I• �� CO S
/ ��� 221VD 5T SE��
� ♦ I
w ;, ��
m �ST SE N �i��� Z6TH ST SE �--
m a U �R,y�YD/;Sf �
� �I � ,
I � 3
SNCK RNER DR SE
y S
E
y `� NSS 3nNWAYS
� U �SE
5 7J
4�`5� Na
�167 w �� m
I N
0
1 m ti�
� �" l
Q-P Q�TH sT 5E
O '�'�,.�s N \
(�`�' >
�'Y9y ¢
I S�St ST S� N W \
r
I 56TH ST SE a o
¢
y � w
N 2ND ST E
P a
y �
D
r
m 62NDST SE
t
�� 5�SE
� 6qtH 65TH 5T S
L
� �w�S� �
�A K
osTs
�
* aueumrransi�s�anon ^/ nt�roTramitxw�es Aubum Transportation Plan
• Auburn Transit Routes
'a"t6"�ae ^� °1eKeT�^��°"°°'�� and Transit Dependent Areas
0 � � aryorn�c� � sa�era�sicRwces
Miles � TansitDepenEentnreaz �� ♦
; •,; wuai��,�csn�merso�re: Ma 4-2
ORD.E Pa e 270 of 751 p
� �,'
���Y�F ` � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� ,� � 4yASHING70i�!
� �
,
_.�Yy 's;
� R � i
�� �� i.,,
�
. ,
CHAPTER S,
� w
� ,.. w .,�;�� �. '
�� cl
,}
�.
Transportat�ori objecnves and policies � � ��' � ����"� � ,��
�
establish the framework for realizing �m �� "
the City's vision of its transportation public Art on West Main Street
system. Policies provide guidance for
the City, other governmental entities and private developers, enabling the
City to achieve its goal in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The policy framework presented below is a guideline, which the City will
use to evaluate individual projects and address its infrastructure needs.
The objectives and policies are organized according to five broad headings.
The first heading, Coordination, Planning and Implementatzon, addresses the
system comprehensively, detailing policies that pertain to the planning and
implementation of the system as a whole. The subsequent four head'ings
list policies specific to the following systems: Street ystem, 1Von-motori�ed
y.rtem, Transit system, and Air transportation. The analysis of the
transportation system, as well as any individual proposals, shall consider all
modes of transportation and all methods of efficiently managing the
network.
C X��rj�ter 5. 1'alzcie.r 1'age S- 1
ORD.E Page 271 of 751
CITY C)E _� �� R
Comprehensive Transportation P1an
Mr' 4VASNtt�GTC7N
�. � ,.
� �
To }�lan, expand, �ind improve the transportation system in cooperation and
caordinatian �tiith adjacent and regiona.i ju.risdietions to ensure cancurrency
compliance with the growth man���ement act, and to provide a safe and
eff cent mult.imodal 5ystern that meets the comxnunity needs and faci]itatcs
the l�nci use p1an.
5.1 Coorclination, Planning and Impl�rv�enta�ion
OBJECTIVE: COORDINATIOtd
To be consistent with regional plans and the plans of neighboring cities; to encourage
partnerships, and not to unreasonably preclude an adjacent jurisdiction from implementing its
planned improvements.
POLICIES:
Coord-Ol: Coordinate transportation operations, planning and
improvements `vith other transportation authorities and governmental
entities (cities, counties, -tribes, state, federal) to address transportarion
issues. These include:
■ Improvement of the state highway network through strong advocacy with state officials;both
elected and staff, for improvements to state highways and interchanges;
� Iinprovements to roadways connecting Auburn to the surrounding region,including SR 167,
SR 18,SR 181/West Ualle.y Hwy,SR 164,and S 277th Street;
o Improved access to the Interstate 5 aorridor and regional employment centers;
� Transit connections to the Regional Growth Centers;
� Establishing tlie Auburn Station as a center for multi-modal transportation connecrions to
proposed future intercity rail service;
■ Strong adyocacy with US congressional members to provide funding to mitigate
transportation problems connected to interstate commerce;and
■ Proactively pursuing forums to coordinate transportation project priorities among other
governmental entities,including proposed future interciry rail service.
Cl���fer>..Polic'ies Pct�e 5-2
ORD.E Page 272 of 751
� :.
�=����Y��E Comprehensive Transportation Plan
. s����F�
� �-� w�s�trN�Tor�
4BJECTIVE: LOiVG-RANGE PLANNING & PROGRAMMING
To continue to pian for the future af the multi-modal transportation system through long-range
planning, programmatic planning, and financial planning, in campliance with the Growth
Management Act.
POLICIES:
P1an-01: The Comj�rehensive Tran.r�ortation Plan shall be evaluated and amended
annu.ally to ensure it is technically accurate, consistent with state, regional,
and other local plans, and in keeping with the City's vision of the future
transportation system.
P1an=02: The Six-Year Tran.rportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital
Facilities Plan (CFP) shall be updated annually to reevaluate project
priorities:, develop a plan to fund capital improvement projeets, and ensure
consistency between project priorities and f nancing plans. Project
evaluation criteria shall foster economic development, maximize utilization
of city financing to match transportation grants, promote safety, integrate
planning of other projects requiring disturbance of pavements, promote
mobility, and optimize the utilization of existing infrastructure,
OBJECTIVE: SAFETY
Ta provide a transportation system that is safe for all users.
POLICIES:
Safety-01: A safe and efficient transportation system shall be prioritized over
driving convenience.
Safety-02.: Utilize education to increase awareness of e�sting traffic laws and
safety issues, especially as they relate to pedestrians and bicyclists.
Safety-03: Engage the community in transportation issues through public
involvement and partnerships with organizations such as the Auburn
School District.
Safery-04: Identify areas with persistent traffic violations and address these
violations, in part, through Police Department enforcement.
Safety-05: Emphasize enforcement of the "rules of the road" for pedestrians,
bicyclists and motorists whose actions endanger others. Conduct
Chcr(�ter S. 1'nlicies 1'o�e.S-3
ORD,E Page 273 of 751
� ��..;
��TY�r � :�� � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.����
� WASHTI�GTC)N
enforcement in a manner that reinforces the messages found in non-
motorized education & safety programs.
Safery-06: Recognize the potential effeets of hazards on transportation
€acilities and incorporate such considerations into the planning and design
of transportation projects, where feasible.
OBJECTIVE: CONNECTIVITY
To provide a highly intercon'nected network of streets and trails far ease and variety of travel.
PoLiciEs:
Co�ect-o1: An efficient transportation system seeks to spread vehicle
movements over a series of planned streets. The goal of the system is to
encourage connectivity while preventing unaeceptably liigh traffic volumes
on any one street. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate access
for emergency vehicles. For these reasons the City will continue to plan a
series of collectors and arterials designed to national standards to provide
efficient service to the community.
Connect-o2: Encourage the use of trails and other connections that provide
ease of travel within and between neighborhoods, community activity
centers, and transit services. Development patterns that block direct
pedestrian access are discouraged. Ample alternatives should exist to
accommodate non-motorized transportation on arterials, collectors, and
local roads.
OBJECTIVE:
ENVIRONMEIVTAL PROTECTION
Minimize the environmental impacts of all new transportation projects and transportation related
improvements.
POLICIES:
Environ-01.; Thoroughly evaluate the impacts of all transportation projects
and apply appropriate mirigation measures in conformance with SEPA,
the Critical Areas Ordinance, and other city, county, state; and federal
regulations.
Cl���ter S..I.'olicre.r 1'ct�e S-4
ORD.E Page 274 of 751
CITY QF
` p� ;-�`� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�g� �;"�����
WASI-tiRlCrTt7N
Environ-02: Identify and consider the environmental impacts of
transportation projects at the earliest possible time to ensure planning and
decisions reflect environmental values; to avoid delays later in the process,
and to reduce or avoid potential problems that may adversely impact the
environment and project outcome.
Environ-03: Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID), green technology,
and sustainability practices into transportation improvements as priinary
alternatives whenever feasible:
Environ-04; Support efforts to improve air quality throughout the Auburn
area and dewelop a transportation system compatible with the goals bf the
Federal and State Clean Air Acts.
Environ-05: Require air quality studies of future major development to assess
impacts created by site generated traffic.
OBJECTIVE: LEVEL-C?F-SERVIGE (�OS) THRESHOLD
To ensure that new development does not degrade transportation facilities to below LOS
standards.
POLICIES:
Los-o1: New development shall not be allowed when the impacts of the
new development on the transportation system degrades the LOS to
below the adopted LOS standard, unless the impacts are mitigated
concurrent with the development as described in Chapter 2.
Los-o2: The term "below level-of-service" shall apply to situations where
traffic attributed to a development likely results in any of the following.
a. An unacceptable increase in hazard or an unacceptable decrease in safety
at an intersection or on a roadway segment.
b. An accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the
proposed regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck
movements that can reasonably result in accelerated deterioration of the
street pavement.
C'Gcrpter 5. I'olicier Pa�e 5-S
ORD.E Page 275 of 751
�n � .,�
��T���� � -��v- �: Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�.������
_..s WASH[h'GTtJhI
c. An unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an
iritersection �vhere two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector
network.
d. An increase in congestion `vhich constitutes an unacceptable adverse
environmental impact under the State Environmental Policy Act.
e. An increase in queuing that causes blocking of adjacent land uses or
intersections.
f. A reducrion in any of the four (4) LOS standards below.
1. Arterial and Collector Corridor LOS: The level-of-service standard for
each arterial and collector corridor is "D", unless otherwise specified in
Chapter 2 of this plan. The City may require a development or
redevelopment to examine a shorter or longer corridor segment than is
specified in Chapter 2, to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are
evaluated.
2. Signalized Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for signalized
intersections is "D", with the following exceptions; for signalized
intersections of two Arterial roads the level-of-service standard during the
AM and PM peak periods is "E" for a maximum duration of 30 minutes
ancl for signalized intersections of two Principal Arterial roads the level-
of-service standard during the AM and PM peak periods is ``E" for a
ma�umum durarion of 60 minutes. The City may require a development or
redevelopment to examine individual signalized or roundabout
intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are
evaluated.
3. Two-Wa�and All-Wa�_Sto�__Controlled Intersection LOS: The level-of
service standard for two-way stop controlled and all-way stop controlled
intersections, is "D". If LOS falls below the standard, analysis and
mitigation may be required in a manner commensu_rate with the associated
impacts. This may include, among other requirements, conducting a traffic
signal warrant analysis and installing or financing a signal or roundabout.
C{�c�trr i. I'olicie.c 1'u�e.5-(
ORD:E Page 276 of 751
C:ITY OF_ �-' s. ,��'' _
� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
������
,��y -� w�s i-�1�vc;7�,�
4. Rounclabout Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for i
roundabout controlled intersections is "D". The City may require a
development or redevelopment to examine to examine roundabout
intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are
evaluated.
LOS-03: Establish a multi-modallevel-of-service system in the future.
LOS-04: PM level of service is the city standard. AM level of service may
need to be analyzed in situations where specialized conditions e�st that
disproportionately impact AM traffic.
�BJECTIVE: GQNCURRENCY
To ensure transportation facilities do not fall below the adopted level-of-service standard, as
required by the Growth Management Act.
POLICIES:
GMA-01: Require developments to construct or finarice transportarion
improvenients and/or implement strategies that mitigate the 'impacts of
riew development concurrent with (within 6 years o� development, as
required by the Growt:h Management Act.
G�-o2: New development that lowers a facility's level-of-service standard
below the locally adopted minimum standard shall be denied, as required
by the Growth Management Act. Strategies that may allow a development
to proceed include, but are not limited to:
� Reducing the scope of a project (e.g. platting fewer lots or building less square footage);
■ Building or financing new transportation improverrients concurrent with (within 6 years.o�
development;
• Phasing/delaying a project;
� Requiring the development to incorporate Transportation Demand Management strategies;or
° Lowering level-of-service standards.
GMA-03: The denial of development in order to maintain concurrency may
be grounds for declaring an emergency for the purpose of amending the
Comprehensive Plan outside of the annual amendment cycle.
Chapter 5. 1�'nlicie.r 1'a,ge�5-7�
ORD.E Page 277 of 751
� ����'
���Y�}� � � ° Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.,�U:������
� �-� �rVASH1h'GTC7N
GMA-04: Evaluate city transportation facilities annually to determine
compliance with the adopted level-of-service standards and, as necessa.ry,
amend the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital
Facilities Plan (CFP) to remedy identified deficiencies.
GMA-05: Coordinate transportation improvements with the State, Counties,
and neighboring jurisdictions to encourage through trips to occur on state
facilities, reducing stress on the city street network.
OBJECTIVE: FINANCE
Ta finance the transportation systems necessary to serue new development, while ensuring the
City has the capability to finance general transportation needs.
POLICIES:
Funding-01; Require developments or redevelopments to construct
transportation infrastructure systems needed to serve new developments.
Fun�ling-o2: Actively pursue the formation of Loca1 Improvement Districts
(LID) to upgrade e�sting streets and sidewalks and construct new streets
to the appropriate standard.
Funding-03: Improvements that serve new developments will be constructed
as a part of the development process. All costs will be borne by the
developer when the development is served by the proposed transportation
improvements. In some instances, the City may choose to participate in
this construction if improvements serve more than adjacent developments.
Funding-04: Revenues for street transportation improvements should
primarily provide for the orderly development of the City's transportation
system in compliance with the Comprehen.sive Tran.sportation Plan. The basic
criterion for such funding should be the degree to which that project
improves the overall transportation system and not the benefit that might
accrue to individual properties. Where it is possible to establish a direct
relarionship between a needed improvement and a development, the
development should be expected to contribute to its construction.
CJin�trrr S..I.'ollcies �'u��S-�'
ORD.E Page 278 of 751
i fA� 'k�;9
���Y�}F � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
���� �
��-�`" w�sNr€��-r�w
Funciing-05: Encourage public/private partnerships for financing
transportation projects that remedy e�sting and anticipated transportation
problems, or that foster economie growth.
Funding-06: Aggressively seek and take advantage of federal.,.state, local, anel
pr.ivate funding and lending sources that help implement the City's
Gomprehen.rive Tran.rportation Plan.
Funding-07: Maintain a traffic impact fee system based on the Institute of
Traffic Engineers (ITE) guidelines, as modified by the City Council, as a
means of enabling development to mitigate appropriately for associated
traffic impacts.
Funding-08: Reassess the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan if
funding .for transportation facilities is insufficient to mainta.in adopted
level-of-service standards.
OBJECTIVE: QUAL.ITY OF LiFE
Ta improve the quality of life for Auburn residents and businesses through design of the
transportation system.
PoLiclEs:
QOL-01: Enhance the livability of Auburn through a var.iety of inechanisms,
including the innovative design and construction of roadways, non-
motorized facilities, and associated improvements. Apply design standards
that result in attractive and functional
. . --- _
transportat�on facilities.
�r � �;
�.�,� .� ���T`
,�° y.
- ,,,.
OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM iUTANAGEMENT (TSM) E ';`
To efficiently operate the existing transportation � �� ��''� � �
, .�,�� �a, , ,�;�,
system through Transportation System � � ;�s,; i ����
Managernent (TSM) strategies, thereby titbi°`���` �
maximizing resources and reducing the need for
costly system capacity expansion projects.
Moving Tra�c More Effectively with
Intelligent Transportation Systems
Cha�iter 5. 17nlicicr pQ��>-%
ORD.E Page 279 of 751
�..��
��Y�» -�- �����• Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� ����� �
�"� " WASHtt�GTt�N
POLICIES:
TSM-Ol: Use TSM strategies to more efficiently utilize the exisring
infrastructure to optimize traffic flow and relieve congestion. Examples
include:
■ Re-ehannelizariori/restriping;adding turn lanes, adding/increasing number of through lanes
� Signal interconnect and optimization;
■ Turn movemerit restrictions;
■ Access Management;and
� Intelligent Trarisportation Systems (ITS).
TSM=02: Support Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation
in coordination with Map 2-7. Future ITS corridors will be prioritized
using the following criteria.
■ Grants,loans, or partner funding can b:e leveraged to expand the ITS system on a specific
corridor(s).
� 'I'here is existing infrastructure that would make it easier and more cost efficient to implement
ITS elements.
� The corridor(s) completes a logical segment or missing link in the citywide ITS network.
■ Significant travel-time savings can be achieved with ITS implementation.
� Corridor supports other Ciry communication and technology needs.
■ ITS implementarion would have significant safery benefits,including reducing the need for
poliee flaggers in intersecrioris during events.
TSM-03: ITS elemenEs include but are not limited to:
� Operauonal improvemerits such as traffic signal coordinarion;
■ Traveler informarion including traffic alerts and emergency norifiearion;
� Incident management;and
� Traffic data eollecrion.
TSM-04: Require development to contribute its share of ITS improvements
as initigation.
TSM-05: Prograin signal timing to encourage specific movements and the
use of travel routes that are underutilizeci.
OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATIOIV DEMAND MANAGEMEIVT (TDM)
Ta utilize transportation demand management strategies to lessen demand for increased st�eet
system capacity, help maintain the LOS standard, and enhance quality of life for those who use
and benefit from the transportation system.
Cln pter>..Po/ie•re.r Pqqe S- 10
ORD.E Page 280 of 751
� *
�"Y�>F Comprehensive Transpor�tation Plan
_. ���. 5���
WASt-!i NGTON
PoLiciEs:
TDM-01: Encourage the use of high-occupancy vehicles (buses, carpool, and
vanpool) through both private programs and under the direction of Metro
and Pierce Transit.
TDM-02: Promote reduced employee travel during the daily peak travel
periods through fle�ble work schedules and programs to allow employees
to work part-time or full-time or at alternate work sites closer to home.
TDM-03: Encourage employers to provide TD1V1 measures in the workplace
th. rough such programs as preferential parking for high-oecupancy
vehicles, car sharing, improved access for transit vehicles, and employee
incentives for using high=occupancy vehicles. -
TpM-o4: In making funding decisions, consider transportation investments
that support transportation demand management approaches by providing I
alternatives to single-occupant vehicles, such as transit, bikeways and
pedestrian paths,
TDM-05: Recognize emerging TDM strategies such as tolling, variable-
priced lanes, and car sharing may be effective in certain situations.
TDM-06: Coordinate with Metro and other jurisdictions to enhance
Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs for GTR employers in Auburn.
TD1v�-o7: Lead by example through implementation of a thorough and
successful Commute-Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City employees.
OBJECTIVE: P,ARKING
To ensure adequate coordination of parking needs with traffic and development needs and
support deveiopment of a regional park-and ride lot system by Metro Transit, Pierce Transit,
Sound Transit, and the Washington State Department of Transportatian.
Po�C1Es:
Parking-01: On-street parking should be allowed only when consistent with
the funct:ion of the street and with traffic volumes.
Parking-02: New developments should provide adequate off street parking
to meet their needs.
C,h«�iler5. 17nlrcie.r Pa�e 5- 1!
ORD.E Page 281 of 751
;.�,. � ,,.
C�TY�?r- :� � u- ff Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�.�����
��� �'� �NASHINGTON
Parldng-03: Develop and maintain regulations, which foster a balance
between meeting the need for public parking and ensuring developers
provide adequate parking to meet the demand generated by new
development.
Parking-04: In certain cases, such as in the Regional Growth Center and in
areas with high pedestrian and transit use, it may be appropriate to reduce
the developer parking obligation to achieve other community benefits or
employ innovative parking strategies such as the use of "park & walk" lots,
�vhere people could park their vehicles and walk to nearby destinations.
Parking-05: The City shall evaluate new residential subdivisions with
constrained space for driveways, utility services� street lights, street trees,
and fire hydrants and the resultant impact on the provision of adequate.
on-street parking. Where appropriate, the City sh.all require the subdivision
to provide dispersed locations of on-street parking (or street accessible
parking) to meet their needs in addition to the zoning code required off
street parking.
Parking-06: Encourage park & ride lots on sites adjacent to compatible land
uses with convenient access to the Auburn Station, SR 18, SR 167, and all
regional transportation corridors:
Parking-07: Work proactively with Sound Transit, WSDOT, Metro Transit,
and Pierce Transit to ensure the adequate supply of park & ride capacity iri
Auburn.
OBJECTIVE. RIGHT-OF-WAY
To retain and preserve existing right-of-way, and identify and acquire new right-of-way as
needed to achieve the City's object'ives.
POLICIES:
ROW-01: The aequisition and preservation of right-of-way is a key
component of maintaining a viable transportarion system. Methods used
to acquire and preserve right-of-way include:
� Requiring dedicarion of right-of-way as a condition of development;
■ Purchasing right-of-way at fair market value;and
Cl��art�rr3..Prrlrcir-s 1.'cr�c5- 92
ORD.E Page 282 of 751
� ,.�°
���Y�� ��� ��� Comprehensive Transpo�tation Plan
�- �=����� �
' �`�� �'` wnSrtiNc�TON
� Aequiring development rights and easements from property owners.
Row-o2: Preserve and protect existing right=of-way through the issuance of
permits such as ROW Use permits and franchise and public �vay
agreements, by monitoring and responding to right-of-.way encroachments
and safety impacts, and by limiting vacations of public right-of-way.
ROW-03: Vacate right-of-way only when it clearly will not be a future rieed
or to supp:ort economic development.
OBJECTIVE: MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATIOfV
To maintain the City`s transportation system at a level that is camparable with the design
standards applied to newfacilities.
PoLiC1Es:
Prsrv-01: Establish programs and schedules for the levei and frequency of
roadway and non-motorized system maintenance.
Prsrv-02: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street
system, the City shall prohibit non-local trip heavy vehicles from traveling
on city streets , unless the City perrimits such travel via the issuance of a
temporary haul permit that requires appropriate mitigation.
Prsrv-03: Establish stanclards of street repair and seek to obtain sufficient
financing to attain and maintain a safe system in good condition.
Prsrv-04: Continue to implement the "Save Our Streets" program for
maintenance and rehabilitation of loeal streets.
Prsrv=05: Continue to implement the arterial/collector streets maintenance
and rehabilitation program.
Prsrv-06: Develop and implement operations and maintenanee procedures to
ensure ongoing effectiveness of LID infrastructure.
Prsrv-07: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street
system, the City may prohibit trenching or cutting into newly construeted
or newly overlaid pavements for a period of 5 years. Overlays of up to the
full roadway width of affected pavement surface should be required as
mitigation in the event cuts into new pavements cannot be avoided.
<.h�r�iter i. I'nlicle.r 1'axe S- 13
ORD.E Page 283 of 751
CITY OT _, }'h
���A ¢-4 ��
� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� - WASHiNGTON
Prsrv-08: City shall notify and coordinate with all private and public utilities
within the City limits when planning to complete pavement overlay's or
reconstruction.
5. $�'�';�t ��St�
OBJECTIVE:
C!J IVI P�E T E ��� ---°-- �� R �_ ��
�.
�� ;'�, STREETS � � ;•.�
_
;. , �
w . � �
� � ..��u� , ��„ '� �q.
� ��-� " Ens�re Auburn s `�—�-���`� ��°
;: _
� ,�,
x.
_. , ��, � , � . , t ,
�, transporta ion
,� `.�� �
,�� system is
� s� ,� designed to
� ���� �
� �� �° �� � �" �" = enable
y .
s � , �'a
� �_� . E , � � � ' �,�a comprehensive, " �
a� �.. �� �,
����` . . �" ��.� �a���,,.r. integrated, safe � ��
� � � �. ... , . 7... .�., .� � � � .
. .., ,.
Save Our Streets - Patch�ng Treatment access for , � • ' �
-� 1 �;��'� �
users of all ��"�� ��v ��
ages and �� ` ���
abilities �°�
including Helping those with Special Needs
' ,k� pedestrians;
� � � � bicyclists, motorists, transit riders and
�. .
�-� ' r�.������`�� ��a� • ���" operators, and truck operators.
�� , � ,.
�_ � ' POLICIES:
�� �� �� ��`�� ��� street-o�1: Plan for and develop a
�� �
p i'F�
,,; � : � �� balanced transportation system,
Save our Streets - Overlay which provides safe access and
connectivity to transportation
facilities for users of all ages and abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists, transit users and operators, and truck operators.
Street-02: Plan for, design, and construet all transportation projects, whether
City led or development driven, to provide appropriate accommodation
for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users in a manner eonsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, except in situations where the establishment of such
facilities would be contrary to public health and safety or tlie cost would
be excessively disproportionate to the need.
Cltaf�ter•>.Po/ic•ifr.c 1'g�(�c S- 14
ORD.E Page 284 of 751
# v
�rrY�f � � � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� rz � � �
��.�� � ,h,As�t�Nc-rc��v
Street-03: Ensure the transportation system meets the requirements outlined
in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Street-04: The Auburn Engineering De.rign Standards is the primary vehicle for
executing the Complete Streets Objective and should include standards for
each roadway classification to guide implementation.
Streef-05.: Context and flexibility in balancing user needs shall be considered
in the design of all projects and if necessary,., a deviation from the Auburn
Engineering Design Standards may be granted to ensure the Complete Streets
Objective ancl supporting policies are achieved.
OBJECTIVE: STREET RIETWORK
To provide an integrated street network af appropriate classes of streets designed to facilitate
different types of traffic flows and access needs.
Po�ciEs:
Ssreet-06: The ciry street system shall be made up of three classes of streets:
a. Arterials - a system of city, county, and state streets designed to move
traff e to or from major traffic and activity generators. Arterials should be
adequate in number, appropriately situated, and designed to accommodate
moderate to high traffic volumes with a minimum of flow disruprion,
b. CoIlectors - a system of city streets that collect traffic and move it from
the local street system to the arterial street system.
c. Local streets - a system of city streets, which collect traffic from
individual sites and conveys the traffic to the collector and arteria,l systems.
Street-07: The Functional Roadway Classifications Map shall serve as the
adopted standard for identifying classif ed streets in the City of Auburn
and the potential annexation areas.
Street-08: Ensure all eligible streets classified in the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan are federally classified.
Chcrpter5. Policie.r Page S- 15
ORD.E Page 285 of 751
� :-4
�17Y�� : � -�� -� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� �.�
��..:: '' 1NASHIhGTC7f�t
Street-09: Street standards shall be developed, modif ed, and implemented
that reflect the street classification system and function. The design and
management of the street network shall seek to improve the appearance of
existing street corridors. Streets are recognized as an important
component of the public spaces within the City and should include, vcThere
appropriate, landscaping to enhance. �' � � �� - �
�~ � � � �� � �
the appearance of city street corridors. ��� � � � � � �
�, � � � �
� � � �
The standards should include ` _ � � �
��� �_ � � � ���� � � �
E �� � � � �� ����� ,
� �
provisions for streetsca in . ��� � �"�'� � � ��� ��� � � '"�
p � g � ,�, � ��� ,� �- ��� � ��_
� �� ��.� � �� �
�: a� �� �
Street-10: The classification standards � � $ � "m � '`
adopted in the Auburn Engineering
De.rign Standard.r are considered the
City's minimum standards for new
streets. In cases in which the City
attem ts to rebuild an existin pnncipa/ArteriaL• 15th Street NW
p g street
within an established right-of-way, the City Council reserves the authority
to determine if additional right-of-way should be obtained in order to
realize the improvement_. Preservation of neighborhood continuity and
cohesiveness will be respected.
Street-11: T`he standards for residential. streets may be modified in cross
section to provide better relationships between the different components
of the street including, but not limited to, on-street parking, the landscape
strip, and the sidewalk. Among other objectives, this may be done to
balance the need to provide adequate parking and buffer pedestrians from
traffic.
Street-12: These m. iriimum standards do not limit or prevent developers from
provid:ing facilities that eXceed the City's standards.
Street-l3:: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a
similar system of arterial designations within Auburn's potential
annexation area.
Cb�aJ�ter.5..l'olicirs PuRe S- 16
ORD.E Page 286 of 751
'j"' #:«K'�
C��Y�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� �..� ,
-�- °' w�s�ir�cro:�
Street-14: Designate new arterials to serve developing a.reas concurrent with
approval of such development. Arter.ials shall be spaced in compliance
with good transportation network planning principles, and support the
importance of overall system circulation.
Street-15: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a
similar system of collector designations within Auburn's potential
annexation area.
Sueet-16: Designate new collectors to serve developing areas concurrent
with approval of such development. Collectors shall be spaced in
compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and
support the importance of overall system circulation. �
Street-17: Access Traets may be permitted, as long as emergency access can
be guaranteed at all times.
Street-18: The local street network shall be developed to ma�mize the
efficiency of the transportation network in residential areas and minimize
through traffic in neighborhoods.
■ The internal local residential street network for a subdivision should be designed to
discourage regional through traffic and rion-residential traffic from penetrating the
subdivision or adjacent subdivisions.
� Where possible, streets shall be planned,designed and constructed to connect to future
development.
° When applicable,non-motorized paths shall be provided at the end of dead end streets to
shorten walking distances to an adjacent arterial or public faciliues including,but not limited
to, schools and parks.
� Residential developments should be planned in a manner that minimizes the number of local
street accesses to arterials and collectors.
� To promote efficient connectivity between areas of the communiry,e�sting stuli end streets
shaIl be linked to other streets in new development whenever the opportuniry arises and the
resulting uaffic volumes are not likely to exceed acceptable volumes as identified in the
Auburn Engineering Design Standards:
t�BJECTIVE: PRIVATE STREETS
To discaurage the development of private streets and ensure, if they are permitted by the City,
they are constructed and maintained according to City standards.
Chcr�iter?. 1'nlicie.r Pa,qe 5- 17
ORD.E Page 287 of 751
r�. � s.
�,TY�,E _ � .� .�. . Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� + F
����.. .,..;-� wnsy�h=cTor�
Por�ciEs:
Street-l9: Private streets are discouraged, but may be permitted on a
discretionary basis; as regulated by city code and the Auburn Engineering
Design Standards.
street-2o: If a private street is permitted, it must be built to public street
standards as identified in the Auburn Engineering De.sign Standard.r and
Con.rtruction Standards manuals.
Street-21: Private streets must provide for emergency vehicle access and be
privately maintained by an approved association or business. The City
does not maintain private streets.
OBJECTIVE: ACCESS MAPIAGEMENT
To IimiE and provide access to the street network in a manner which improves and maintains
public safety and roadway capacity.
POLICIES:
Street-22: Seek consolidation of access points to state highways, arterials, and
collectors. This will benefit the highway and city street system, reduce
interference with traffic flows on arterials, and discourage through traffic
on local streets. To aehieve this level of access control, the City:
■ Adopts and supports the State's controlled access policy on all state highway faciliries;
� May acquire access rights along some arterials and collectors;
■ Adopts design standards thaE identify access standards for each type of functional street
classificatiori;
■ Encourages consolidation of access in developing commercial and high densiry residenrial
areas through shared use of driveways and local access streets;and
■ Will establish standards for ac.cess management,develop a planning process to work with the
corrimuni:ry and implement access managemerit solutions ori arterial corridors.
Street-23: Strive to prevent negative impacts to existing businesses,without eompromising safery,
when implemeriring aceess managemerit,
OBJECTIVE: THROUGH TRAFFlC
To accommodate through traffic in the City as efficiently as possible, with a minimum of
disruption to neighborhoods.
C{�n�/er i.1'oli�ie.r Pufie S- 18
ORD.E Page 288 of 751
C.1 I Y t)F_. e-� ��- �.. *,
- � � �:� � �
Comprehensive Transportafion Plan
��`"-� vV�tst�isNc;To;v
POLICIES:
Street-24; Continue to coordinate with the Washington State Department of
Transportarion to facilitate the movement of traffie through the City.
Street-25: Encourage the State and Gounties to develop through routes,
which minimize the impact of through traffic on Auburn's residential
neighborhoods.
Street-26: Actively solicit action by the State and Counties to program and
construct those improvements needed to serve Auburn to the state and
county arterial and freeway systems.
OBJECTIVE. TR�4FFIC CALMING ��
To employ traffic calming techniques ta improve safety and neighbarhaod quality,
POLICIES:
Street-27: I.mplement the City's traffi.c calming program to improve
neighborhood safety and quality.
Street-28: The traffic calming program shall require a technical analysis of
existing conditions and appropriate treatments before actions are taken to
fund and implement traffic calming measures..
Street-29: The traffic calming program shall incorporate neighborhood
involvement and seek community support,
Street-30: New construction should incorporate traffic calming measures, as
appropriate.
OBJECTIVE: FREIGH�' MCJVEMENTS
Ta facilitate the mavements of freight and goods through Auburn with minimal adverse traffic
and other environmental impacts.
PoLiCiEs:
Freight-Ol: The movement of. freight and goods is recognized as an
important component of Auburn's transportation system,
Freight-02: The movement of freight and goods which serve largely national,
state, or regional needs should take place in such a way so that the impacts
on the local transportation system are minimized. These movements
Cbapter 5. 1'nlrcie.r 1'age.5- 1 J
ORD.E Page 289 of 751
� �
�=Tt t�� � ��-�h Comprehensive Transportation Plan
. t,«,. ,, .� WASHiNG7CJN
should take place primarily on state highways, Interstates, or on :grade-
separated rail corridors in order to minimize the local impaets.
Freight-03: Seek public and private partners. to leverage funds for freight
improvement projects and associated mitigation.
Freight-04: Continue to work with the Freight Mobility Roundtable, FAST,
FNISIB, and other local and regional groups to ensure regional needs are
met, and local impacts are mitigated.
Freight-05: All through truck trips and the majority of local trips shall take
place on designated truek routes, as identified on the truck route map;
Map 2-3, of the Comprehen.rive Transportation Plan. This policy shall not apply
to developments and uses operating under e�usting right=of=way use
permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements directly
related to the regulation of permitted haul routes.
Freight-06: If the City is unable to acquire funding to maintain e�sting truck
routes to a Pavement Condition Index Standard of 70 on a segment of
roadway, that route may be restricted or closed to truck travel.
Freight-07: Work towards designing and construcring future truck routes, as
identified on the truck route map in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan, to susta,in routine truck traffic.
Freighr-08: Local truck trips that have origins and/or destinations in Auburn
may have to sometimes use routes not designated as truck routes. The City
may approve the use of alternate routes not currently designated as truck
routes for truck traffic, with appropriate mitigation. Approval may be
made through issuance of right-of-way use perrriits, traffic mitigation
agreements or equivalent agreements.
Freight-09: Development shall be required to mitigate the impacts of
construction generated truck traffic on the City's transportation system,
based on the City's LOS standard.
Freight-10: Temporary haul routes for overweight or oversized vehicles shall
be permitted under circumstances acceptable to the City and with
Cf�r�ter.i. !'olriitr, Pcrse S-20
ORD.E Page 290 of 751
� >°,
«Y�f °�: �� �� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�- WASHINGTON
appropriate mitigation. A temporary haul permit must be obtained prior
to the hauling of oversized or overweigh.t freight.
Freight-11: `Pruck traffic in residential neighborhoods shall be prohibited,
eXcept for local deliveries within said neighborhood; unless no other
possible route is available, in which case mitigation may be required.
OBJECTIVE: LATECOMER POLICY
Ta enable private investars ta recover a portion af improvement casts for transportatian facility
improvements that benefit other developments.
POLICIES:
LC-01: The City may enter into latecomer agreements where substantial
transportation investments are made by one party that legitimately should
be reimbursed by others, such as, when the infrastructure improvement
will benefit a future development. Such agreements will be at the
diseretion of the City Council, Latecomer agreements do not apply to
situations in which a property owner is required to construct
improvements per an e�sting city code provision, such as in the case of
half-street and other frontage improyements.
og.�ECT�vE: RouN�ABouTs
To seek air quality, safety, and capacity benefits by promoting the use of roundabouts over
traffic signals.
POLICIES:
RB-01: Intersections controlled with roundabouts are preferred over
signalized intersections whenever feasible and appropriate due to the
benefits achieved with roundabouts including. reduced collision rate for
vehicles and pedestrians, less severe collisions, smoother� traffic flow,
reduced vehicle emissions and fuel consumption, lower long-term
mairitenance costs, and improved aesthetics.
Rs-o2: Developments required to signalize an intersection as mitigation for
a proJ'eet may be required to install a roundabout instead of a traffic signaL
The feasibility of acquiring the land needed for a roundabout `vill be
considered as a factor in this requirement.
Cbcr�iteri. Pnlicier ]�pxF>_21
ORD:E Page 294 of 751
� �-r:
«TY�F �.� �-- ,- Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�...� µ ,:
�r-�'� .�� wAs�t��vrcrt�n� �
5.� on-rnotoriz�cl Sy�tern
OBJECTIVE: PLANIVIRIG THE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEIVI
To plan a coordinated, interconnected network of non-motorized transportation facilities that
effectively provide access to local and regional destinations, improve overall quality of life, and
support healthy community and enviranmental principles.
POLICIES:
NM-01: Implement land use regulations and encourage site design that
promotes non-motorized forms of transportation.
NM-02: Include the role of non-motorized transportation in all
transportation planning, programming, and if suitable, capital
improvement projects.
�r� � � �� �3���� y� �
� � �
� � � �,�
� �, g,� �
� �_ ��� ��� � �� �� � � �, _
�xt � � � � ��� � ����`" „� � r
�� q. �1 � �� �
�„ rti � t �
�°:'�� ';.vt� g �� ��Y ��' .
r ����S _::�,c ,��. i
`
. s«�� ;i ,�,�
.���"�<
Interurban Trail at W Main Street
NM-03: Plan for contiriuous non-motorized circulation routes within and
between existing, new or redeveloping commercial, residential, and
industrial developments. Transportation planning shall seek to allow
pedestrians and bicyclists the ability to cross or avoid barriers in a manner
that is safe and convenient.
___ _
NM-04: Actively seek to acquire land along corridors identified for future
trail development in the Comprehen.cive Tran.rportation Plan and Auburn Parks,
Kecreation, d� Open Space.Plan 2005 and subsequent Park plans;
CGr�tei•S..P�li�ir.s Pa�e S-�2
ORD.E Page 292 of 751
���Y�F � -� ��=� Comprehensive Transpor�ation Plan
1�.�=B�T�C�
. .� WASH[NG70N �
NM-05: Schedule, plan and co-sponsor events that support recrearional
walking and bicycling. These events should emphasize their recreational
and health values and introduce people to the transportation capabilities of
bicycling and walking.
NM-06: Improve and protect the non-motorized transportation system
through the establishment of level-of service goals for non-motorized
facilities.
OBJECTIVE: DEVELOPIIVG THE Nt3N-MOTORIZED SYSTEM
To build a safe, attractive, and inter-connected non-motorized transportation system.
POLICIES:
NM-06: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike
routes, walkways and equestrian paths, to encourage significant
recreational use.
NM-07: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike :
routes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths in a manner that promotes non-
motorized travel as a viable mode of transportation.
NM-08: Develop the non-motorized system to accommodate appropriate '
alternarive forms of non-motorized transport, as well as medically
necessary motorized transport. 'i
NM=09: Appropriate street furniture, lighting, signage, and landscaping .
should be installed along non-motorized routes to increase safety and to
ensure that facilities are inviting to users.
NM-10: Clearly sign and mark major non-motorized routes to guide
travelers and improve safety.
NM-11: Non-motorized routes shall be constructed to accommodate
emergency vehicle access and be amenable to law enforcement.
NM-12: Locate and design non-motorized transportation systems so that
they contribute to the safety, efficiency, enjoyment and convenience of
resiciential neighborhoods. �
Gl��r�ter 5.1'olzcie.r ]'aXe 5-23
ORD.E Page 293 of 751
-. # .�`
�����?� - �-���� R Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�
N � _
�
fl"�`c,. ."~ WASHINGTC}N •
NM-13: The development of facilities supporting non-motorized
transportation should be provided as a regular element of new
construction projects. Improvements shall be secured through the
development review process.
NM-14: Minimize hazards and obstructions on the non-motorized
transportation system by properly designing, constructing, managing, and
ma.intaining designated routes in the system.
OBJECTIVE:
PEDESTRIAiV TRAVEL
To enhance and encourage pedestrian travel in Auburn,
POLICIESE
Ped-01: Promote pedestrian travel within the city and connections to
adjacent communities with emphasis placed on safety and on connectivity
to priority destinations such as schools, parks, the downtown, and other
pedestrian=oriented areas: Pedestrian-oriented areas are those areas with
high pedestrian traffic or potential and are identified in this plan_. These
areas and streets shall encourage pedestrian travel by providing enhanced
pedestrian improvements or controls on motorized traffic..
Ped-02: Focus investments on and aggressively seek fund.ing for the high
priority pedestrian corridors, identified in Map 3-2.
. . . . . . .
Ped-03: Require developers to incorporate pe. estrian acilit�es into new
development and redevelopment in conformance with the Auburn City
Code.
Ped-04: Gontinue to construct new and rehabilitate existing sidewalks
through a sidewalk improvement program.
Ped-05: Seek waps to provide pedestrian amenities such as streetlights, trees,
se�ating areas, signage, and public art along all major pedestrian travel
routes.
Ped-06: Work towards buffering pedestrian walkways from moving traffic,
particularly in areas with high levels of pedestrian movements, such as near
Clnzf�tr.�•i.Poliiiet Prttic 5-24
ORD.E Page 294 of 751
_
� ,�
���Y�?E- Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� ""� . ' wns r����'7�c�;v
schools and commercial areas, and along corridors with heavy vehicular
traffic.
Ped-07: Pedestrian crossings shall be developed at locations with significant
pedestrian traffic and designed to match pedestrian desire lines.
Ped-08: Encourage the formation of LIDs to develop pedestrian pathways
and other non-motorized amenities throughout the City. Partner with the.
local school districts to improve Safe Walking Routes to Sehool.
OBJECTIVE: BICYCLE TRAVEL
To improve Auburn's bicyc{ing netwbrk.
POLICIES:
Bi1{e-o1: Develop programs and publications, and work with local employers
to encourage citywide bicycle commuting.
Bike-o2: Designate, develop, and maintain high priority bicycle routes, in
conformance with Map 3-4, that create an interconnected system of bike
facilities for local and regional travel, includ.ing on-street bike routes, and
multi-purpose trails.
Bike-03: During the development review process, ensure projects are
consistent with the Non-motorized chapter of the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan by requiring right-of-�vay dedications and other
improvements as needed to develop the bicycle network.
Bike-04: Focus investments on and aggressively seek funding for the high
priority future bicycle corridors, identified in 1VIap 3-4 and corridors and
connectors, as applicable, specified in Map 3-5.
Bike-05: E.ncourage the inclusion of convenient and secure bicycle storage
facilities in all large public and private developments.
Bike-06: Continue to develop and implement Sharrows and associated Share
the Road signage in residential and some non-residential areas of City.
Bi1{e-o7: Continue installation of bike lanes in parts of City where there is
existing/adequate right-of-way..
Ch�zpter S. 1'�licie.r Pa�e S-25
ORD.E Page 295 of 751
� � .�
��Y�r �a'� ��;���� Co�mprehensive Transportation Plan
�� .� � �
,.� :��-,.�-. �� WASHiNGTON
Bi1{e-os: Develop an Auburn speci_fic bicycle signage program to highlight
corridors, connectors and in-city/out of city de-stinations.
Bike-09: Make improvements to e�sting Interurban Trail — signage,
pavement conditions, vegetation maintenance, grade crossings, and
upgrades to user facilities at Main Street crossing.
Bike-10: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate
for the design and construction of bicycle/pedestrian bridge at southern
terminus of M St. west of e�sting Stuck River Vehicle Bridge.
s�e-11: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate
for the design and construction of innovative and safe pedestrian/bicycle
crossing at M St./Auburn Way South interseetion.
Bike-12: I-nstall one or more bike boxes through a pilot program approach
to test effectiveness and public response. Focus pilot program efforts at
key intersections such as the West Main Street and C Street intersection,
the NI Street and Auburn Way South intersection and the Ellingson Road
and A Street intersection.
Bike-13: Contiriue to install bicycle/pedestrian crossing warning systems
along Interurban Trail at all crossing locations consisting of S 277th Street,
37th Street NW, and W Main Street.
Bike-14: Develop and maintain an official Auburn Bicycling Guide Map.
Bike-15: In coordination with the City Gouncil, Mayor's Office, Auburn.
Area Chamber af Commerce, Auburn Tourism Board and appropriate
City departments develop strategies and actions for the implementation of
the bicycle oriented economic development recommendations of the
Auburn Bicycle Task Force.
QBJECTIVE: EQUESTRIAN TRAVEL
To improve Auburn's equestrian environment.
POLICIESc
Eq-o�; Strive to incorporate equestrian facilities into the design of trail and
transportation facilities, where possible and appropriate. These efforts
Cl�r�ter i. 1'oli�i�-s Pu,?e.S-?6
ORD:E Page 296 of 751
{t4"YOE_
r � x_ � r
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
. ,��SFf��,����w
should be concentrated south of the White River in Auburn's southeast
corner and in Lea Hill, but considered for other areas of the City.
Eq-o2: Transportation projects, and other public and private projects, in
lower=density neighborhoods should be evaluated, and where possible,
planned, designed and constructed to be compatible with equestrian use.
Eq-03: Create an interconnected system of safe equestrian trails and provide
adequate equestrian amenities adjacent to those trails.
5.4 Tr�nsit Syst�rn
OBJECTIVE: TRANSIT SERVICES
To encourage the continued develnpment af public transit systems and nther alternatives to
single occupant vehicle travel, to relieve traffic congestion, ta reduce reliar�ce on the automobile
far personal transportation needs, to improve raute coverage and scheduling, and to ensure
transit is a convenient and reliable mode aption for both local and regional trips.
Transit-01; Partner with WSDOT, Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound
Transit, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and private businesses to achieve
Auburn's transit and passenger rail objectives.
T#ansit-02: Work with local and regional transit agencies to serve new and
e�sting trip generators in Auburn, such as colleges, commercial areas, and
community facilities.
Transit-03; Encourage Sound Transit, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to
expand transit to underserved areas of Auburn.
Transit-04: Partner with WSDOT, Amtrak, and Sound Transit to establish
an intercity passenger rail stop at the Auburn Station.
Transit-05: Consider both the transit impacts and the opportunities
presented by major development proposals when reviewing development
under.the State Environmental Policy Act.
Transit-06: Encourage the inclusion of transit facilities in ne`v development
when appropriate.
Transit-07: Encourage bus stops to be located at well-lit and accessible areas.
Cl�cr�iter 5. Pnlr.'cie.r paXe 5_2;
9RD.E Page 297 of 751
CITY OF -�,� % ��� * �``
A Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.��=����
�� --.�"% , WASHIREGTC)N
Transit-08: Work with transit providers and regional agencies to develop a
transit system that is fully accessible to pedestrians and the physically
challenged, and which integrates the access, safety, and parking
requirements of bicyclists.
Transit-09: Identify areas of coneentrated transit traffic and impose design
and construction standards that accommodate the unique considerations
associated with bus travel, sueh as street geometry and pedestrian linkages.
Transit-10: Work with transit providers to create new commuter — oriented
transit routes and maintain eXisting commuter routes linked with Sounder
commuter rail.
Transit-ll: Develop rider information packages that inform users of
commuter, transit, rail, trail, and a.ir transportation opportunities.
5.5 Air Transpo ataon
OBJECTIVE:
AIR TRANSPORTATIOIV
To provide an efficient municipal airport, serving light general aviation aircraft, as an integral
part of the City's transportation system.
POLICIES:
Air-ol: Continue to develop the Aubu_rn Municipal Airport in accordanee
with the Airport Master Plan.
Air-02: The airport shall be managed as a general awiation facility; the use of
jet aircrafts and helicopters that create noise anci land use confliets shall be
evaluated, in conformance with FAA regulations.
�=03: The siting of new airport facilities sha11 consider neighborhood
impacts such as increased noise generated from the use of those facilities.
Air-o4: LTse of the airport by non-conventional aircraft such as ultra lights
shall be discouraged, in conformance with FAA regulations.
Air-o5: The City's zorung ordinance and other appropriate regulatory
measures shall enforce the airport clear zones as regulated by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA). The impact of development on air safety
G�v�ter 5.1'�licie.r Pa�e 5-25
ORD.E Page 298 of 751
< �., '
��-YC» � -. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
- 4trASHiNGT(JN
shall be assessed through SEPA review, and appropriate mitigation
rneasures shall be required by the City.
Air-o6: Minimize or eliminate the potentially adverse effects of light and
glare on the operation of the Auburn Airport.
C1?apter i.1'alzcic.r I'axe 5-2J
ORD.E Page 299 of 751
. � ,-
��TY°F ��`P��� � � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�
,��—�'� eWASNlNGTON
CHAPTER E.
� I�
The abiliry to finance the maintenance and enhancement of the transportation system is critical to
the iinplementarion of this plan and the success of the future transportation system. This chapter
details the financial planning tools and funding mechanisms available to accomplish these goals.
.1 �ir��ncial la non ar�c! ro ra in
The Ciry updates its fina.neial plan annually in order to ensure programmed transportation
improvements are financially feasible and priorirized in accordance with available funds. The
Tran.rportation Improvement Program and Capital F`acilitie.r Plan are the two financial planning
documents the City uses to idenrify its financial strategy for implernenring transportation
improvements.
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Trans�ortation Improvement Program (TIP) is a s� year plan which lists programmed
tran..sportarion improvements in the following categories: roadway improvement projects,
intersection improvement projects, non-motorized and transit projects, preliminary engineering
and miscellaneous projects, and preservation projects. Transportation needs are identified by
. _,,..,.
�4 �,,, � ����, , -nining the latest information concerning
� ` ' :X;.4° � �; ;ry and accident history, growth trends, the
,: �_ -�,,�.
� � ^t"�c model, traffic studies, and the
� �q��..., � � �...:
.
` prehensive Tr.ansportation Plan. The City
��,��`��° - ts a s�-year Tran.rportatzon Improvement Program
� � � ) annually, including a revenue forecast and
���� ysis of available funding. Projects are then
����x.��.�,.�; rirized according to a numlier of factors
, ��� �' ' q t' _ �-uding safery, capaciry needs,access needs,and
, , _ e�,� :�
;�a�. .�� � �.� � � .
� � � j k �skof httie TIP niust be financiall e first three
� �°, -
�,� �, �� y constrained�
'��" �� roject programming is often limited due to
' 'ng limitarions.
Auburn City Hall
The TIP is an important tool for idenrifying
funding needs and developing a financial plan for
project implementation. It also feeds into the Capital Facilitie.r Plgn:
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The Capital Facilitzes Plan (CFP) is the Comprehensive Plan element which identifies the financial plan
for implementing all capital improvements in Aubum. Transportation improvements are included
Cbnpter 6.Furtding Pa;e 6- l
ORD.E Page 300 of 751
C1Tl(?�_ -� � ,•��
�-� N Comprehensive Transportation Plan
- t�:��J�.�T
� WASHINC;GT{?N
in the Capital Facilitze.r Plan, which is amended annually. The Capital Facilities Plan enables the Ciry
to fulfill the GMA requirement of having a rnultiyear fnaneirig plan based on identified
transportation needs. It also enables the Ciry to make informed decisions about its investment of
public dollars and make rimely decisions about maintaining levels-of-service in accordance with
the Comprehensive Plan standards.
�a� 6a8i�tlB,� ������r� �
T'he Ciry uses a combinarion of public and private funding sources to implement transportarion
improvernents in Auburn,both for maintenance activiries and capital improvemenes.
GENERAL T�►X REVENtJES
'The City receives tax revenues from a variery of state, regional, and local sources including the real
estate excise tax, sales tax, and the motor vehicle fuel tax. Despite these revenues, the Ciry has
numerous maintenance and capital improvement needs that cannot be met by existing tax
revenues alone.
Recognizing the need to raise addirional revenues for the local street system, Auburn residents
approved the `Save Our Streets' (SOS) program in 2004 for specific funding from properry taxes,
and in doing so, created a funding program to help rehabilitate Auburn's residenrial streets. In
2013, the City Council modified the funding source for the program to be from Construction
Sa1es Tax instead of property taxes.
With the success of the `Save Our Streets' program, the City intends to pursue a program that will
help fund arterial and collector street maintenance. The Ciry does have an Arterial Street Fund;
however, these funds have proven inadequate in addressing all the maintenance and capital needs
of the arterial system.
In addition; the Ciry has also ereated an Arterial Street Preservation Program to preserve and '�
rehabilitate the pavement on these classes of streets. The program is funded through a one
percent utiliry tax which was adopted by City Council during 2008.
GRANTS
The Ciry has an active grant program and continually seeks grants, both private and public, to
improve Auburn's transportation system. The following is a list of some of the grants the City has
historically appliecl for and will likely apply for again in the futu're.
FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGItAMS
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) replaced the Transportation
Enhancement (TE) Activities with the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). The original
TE acrivities remain eligible for TE funds tliat were previously apportioned until the TE funds are
obligated, rescinded, or lapse. MAP-21 funds projects designed to strengthen the cultural,
aesthetic, and environmental aspects of the inter-modal transportarion system. The progra..m
provides for the implementaEion of a variery of non-traditional projects, including the restoration
of historic transportation facilities, the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities�
landscaping and scenic beautification,and the mitigation of water pollution from highway runoff.
Cbu,t�ter 6. Fundirtg Pn�e r-2
ORD.E Page 301 of 751
# �� �}�s,
��TY��- �� �-�- Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� �,
� �� iNASH1NCTC7N
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by
states and localiries for projects on any public road, non-motorized improvements, bridge
projects,and transit capital projects.
The Safefy Progranm is a federal program targeted at reducing accident ra.tes at intersecrions and
along corridors, particularly at those locations with higher than average fataliry and injury rates.
Funds come from the Highway Safery Improvement(HSIP) Program included in MAP-21. HSIP
requires tkat states program and spend safery funds according to their Strate�,ric F-Ii l�zw�a�� Safet�
I'lan.Washington State's plan is called Tartret.Zero.
The Congesuon Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program is a federally funded program
administered through PSRC. CMAQ funds projects and programs in air quality non-attainment
and maintenance:areas,which reduce transportation related emissions.
In addition to the aforementioned programs, the federal government has an annual appropriations
bill. Auburn may apply through the offices of Washington senators arid congressional members
for funeiing for specific projects. This funding source has historically been a successful means of
financing some of the City's more expensive capital improvement projects.
FEDERAI.LEGISLATION
President Obama signed MAP-21 (P.L. 112-141) into law on July 6� 2012. This major
transportarion law provided$105 billion for the nation's surface transportation programs over a
two-year period. MAP-21 replaced the Safe, Accountable, Fle�uble, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act—A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LL�,which was enacted in 2005 with an expiration
date of 2009. Congress had passed nine sho.rt-term extecisions to SAFETEA-LU before finally
agreeing the two=year MAP-21 almost three years later. After a series of extensions, MAP21 is
now set to expire Octolier 29, 2015. Efforts are currendy underway in Congress to reauthorize the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21).The 2009 American Kecovery and
Keinve.rtmentAct also dedicates funding to numerous prograrns, many of whieh can be used to help
finance tlie City's programmed transportation improvement projects.
STATE FUNDED PROGRAMS �
The Safe Routes to Schools Program is a state and federally funded program that aims to
protect children from traffic related deaths and injuries and promotes a healthy lifesryle by
encouraging bicycling and walking to school.
The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grant is a state funded program that funds non-motorized
safery improv.em. ents.
The Ttansportation Improvement Boatd (TIB) administers annual grant programs that fund
roadway and non-motorized projects that improve safety, mobiliry, capacity, a.nd prom.ote
economic development. The TIB offers several programs, each of wluch emphasizes different
funding criteria.
The Cornmunity Econoriuc Revitalizarion Board (CERB) is a state funded program that
provides low-eost finaneing for public faciliry improvements. Aublic entities are eligible to apply
for and reeeive loans and grants for public facilities linked to economic development outcomes
Cfic�ter 6. Fusrding Pa�c 6-i
ORD.E Page 302 of 751
« :l
��Ty�� ` - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� ,
��-�':.. ,.-' w�as�-t�a�rcTc�n
such as private business investment and job creation: CERB a,lso finances site-specific studies and
plans.
�a,�n�s
Low-interest loans are also available to municipalities. For example the Washington State
Department of Commerce Public Works Board offers low-interest loans for local governmenes to
finance public infrastructure eonstruction a.nd rehabilitation. Eligible projects must improve public
health and safety, respond to environmerital issues; promote eeonomie development, or upgrade
system performance. Roads, sueets and bridges are eligible for these loans. 'The loans can be
strategically employed to leverage grant funding by providing a local match, enabling the City to
compete for funding for public infrastructure projects. In addition, the City has the option of
issuing bonds for public infrastructure projects.
P�ivATE sEc-roR coNTRfBuzior�s
The Ciry has an estalilished traffic iriipa.ct fee system based on the Insritute of Traffic Engineers
(ITE) guidelines, as amended by the City Council. The fee system estimates the amount of traffic
each development is anticipated to create, based on the land use type and size. Traffic irnpact fees
compensate the Ciry for the capaciry improvements needed to accommodate the new trips
generated by new development. Iri turn, the Ciry uses the revenues .to expand the street network
through the capaciry projects included in the TIP. The f'ees are baseci on the costs of the capac.i.ty
project included in the TIP and forecast growth throughout the City. The fees are updated
annually following the adoption of the TIP by C.ity Council. Payment of the impact fee does not
relieve developers of their codified obligation to construct ha.l.f-street improvements, nor the need
to mitigate project impacts identified through the SEPA process, which may include the
construction of an identified TIP project (and a credit for the impact fee contribution towards
that project).
The City also charges a truck impact fee for certain land-use rypes which are assoeiated with
significant truck traffic generation, such as commercial and industrial uses. T'hese fees are used to
address impa.cts on the Ciry's truck routes and other truck-related infrastructure.
FUNDING PARTNERSHIPS
The City has successfully formed several funding parmerships, which have enabled it to leverage
its reSources in implementing transportapon improvements.
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
Local Improvement Districts (LID) enable city investment in a specified area by leveraging ciry
funds; when available, with contributions from properry owners in the district. In essence, LID's
are a means of using limited ciry resources tb improve neighborhood quality through
improvement of streets, sidewalks,and other features of the roadway.
FAST(FREIGHT ACTION STRATEGY TEAM�
FAST is an innovative partnership composed of transportarion agencies, ports, cities, economic
development organizations; trucking, rail, and business interests. One of FAST's primary
objectives is to obtain funding for projects that improve freight mobility. FAST helped fund the S
Chaj�ter 6. Farndir7g p,��P/,_¢
ORD_E- Page 303 of 751
�` � �# Comprehensive Transportation Plan
CITY OF ��W
�
e,, ������
,•'�'�� �� WASH I l�lGTON
277th Street Grade Separ.ation, the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation; and the M Street Underpass
project.
FMSIB(FREIGHT MOBILITY$TRATEGIC INVESTMENT BOARD�
The mission of the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) is to create a
comprehensive and coordinated state progra.m to facilitate freight moveinent to local, ciational,
and international markets. FMSIB is also eharged with lessening the impact of freight movements
on local communities. FMSIB obtains funding directly from legislative appropriarions and has
contributed funds to the 3rd Street SW Grade Separauon, the S 277th Srreet Grade Separation
and the M Street Underpass projects.
FUTURE FINANCING POSSIBILITIES
As the transportarion system evolves, so will the range of financing oprions available to the City.
In general, the financing options currendy available under state law fall short of ineering currerit
and anticipated transportarion improvement needs. Hence, the City will continue to seek fair and
sustainable strategies for funding the maintenance acrivities and capital improvements needed to
preserve the Ciry's transportarion network.Among other strategies, the implementation of a street
ut'tlity may be employed to fund many of the City's transportarion needs:
TRANSPORTt1TION BENEFIT DISTRICT
In 1987; the State Legislature created.Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs) as an option for
local governments to fund transportation improvements. Chapter 36.73 of the Revised Code of
Washington provides for the establishment of TBD by ciries and counties to levy and impose
various taxes and fees to generate revenues to support transportation improvements within the
district. A TBD is a quasi-muriicipal corporarion and independent taxing district.created for the
sole purpose of acquiring, constructing, improving, providing, and funding transportation
improvements within the district. In 2005 and 2007, the Legislature amended the TBD statute to
expand its uses and reveriue authority, insluding the abiliry to authorize a $20 annual vehicle
license fee (VLF), and up to an additional $80 of VLE, if approved by voters within the district.
The state legislature provided local gbvernments with these tools because inflation has eroded the
local share of gas tax and a series of statewide ballot iniriatives passed over the last 12 ye.ars have
eliminated other traditional sources of funding for local transportarion needs.
The Ciry of Auburn created a TBD in 2011.The TBD is currently considering the implementarion
of the $20 annual vehicle fee,possible loeal sales tax increase and how the revenue raised could be
best used to achieve tfie goals of the'IBD.
S�rxxEET UTir.rrsr
A street utility would be used similarly to how sewer and water util'try fees are now coIIected. A
monthly or annual fee would be charged to residents and businesses in Auburn, for example via a
flat fee or through a pro-rated fee based on anticipated usage.
The implementation of a street utiliry would require a change in state law. The street utility system
is one in which all residents and businesses would pay their fair share of funding streex
maintenanee and repair. If implemented, a street ut'iliry would undoubtedly be combined with the
suite of other financing strategies the City currendy employs.
Cl�aj�ter 6.Funding P�rge 6-.5
ORD.E Page 304 of 751
-
���' � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
CITY{aF �. � *
.. �: "t .''V .;
� -v`�' WASH(NGTC)N
�.� Fundin� Strat�gies and P�°�j��t Prio�ite�atia�n
The City uses a variety of criteria to prioririze transportation projects, including safery, mobiliry,
and overall community benefi.t. In addition, the Ciry also considers the availabiliry of funding and
the abiliry to leverage Ciry dollars to raise addition funds. For example, grants are often available
for specific rypes of capital investments, whereas they are more limited for
maintenance/preservation. Hence, the Ciry often needs to budget for maintenance/preservation
through tax reve.nues. Capital improvements may be financially secured through a combination of
public and private investment. Henee; projeet prioritization for capital improvements is often
partially dependent on the atiility to secure outside funding. Likewise, maintenance and
preservation is highly dependent on the 'limited tax revenues available to the City: In the future,
the City will need to continue lobbying for its share of federal, state,and counry tax revenues;seek
creative avenues for securing private investment dollars and grant funds, and potenrially
implement new funding strategies such as tolling and street u.tiliry fees,
Chupter 6.Fcrnditrg p,a��;�_�
ORD.E Page 305 of 751
� � > -
�iTX��- � �� - � Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� �`�� � '' ^�wASHr�vcTo�
� ��� �;,.
�
� �,�>, ti. �', ��.
:„.
��
�
�� � �� ���
� �� �� � re
' a � ..� N �'. � - .
s ;
�
,�,
�s�
CHAPTER 7. �..
�a,�
,
�`� �� ���
�� I� �Ii� t� `. � � �.
�� ,
£,
`/ � ��� _��� ��,� �,
� Y������� . . �
�: :
, ,� q�.
°�,:� �
The Gomprehensive Transportarion Plan, a long- , - ,
range plan with the horizon year 2035; predicts Auburn Time
the needs and conditions of the future
transportation system, en.abling the Ciry to Aubum Station C/ock
anticipate its future needs. Nonetheless, the
transportation network is dynamic, constantly evolving due to circumstances beyond the scope
and influence of this plan. Hence,regular updates are necessary to ensure the Plan remains current
and relevant.
7.1 nrtuallJ dates
The Comprehensive Transportarion Plan can b.e amended annually as part of the City's regular
Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle, which ensures proposed changes go through a public
review process before the amended plan is adopted by the City Council at the end of the calendar
year. In prepararion for the annual amendment cycle, the Ciry will review the plan and propose
updates as rieeded. These proposed updates may be due to changes to Ciry priorities, the
availabiliry of new information,or the relevance of certain plan components:
RE-EVALUATION
The annual re-evaluarion process provides an opportuniry for the Ciry to idenrify progress made
in implementing the Plan, as well as idenafy new needs that have arisen sinee the previou.s update.
The update will consider the street, non-motorized and transit systems, and assess whether the
Plan adequately addresses the implementation strategies necessary to ensure the transportarion
infrastructure conrinues to grow in line with the City's objecrives.
As part of this process; the City will review its future projects list and update the Tran�ortatzon
Improvement Program and the Caliital Facilities Plan as appropriate. It will also review and update the
Policies and Funding chapters, in order to remain consistent with the City's vision and current
with potential funding strategies.
TECHNICAL iNFORMATION
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan contains a range of technical data, much of which
informs other elements of the Plan. As part of the annual amendment cycle, technical
information, such as traffic volumes, e�usting levels-of-service, roadway classifications, and trans'it
route and ridership informarion w'ill be updated as appropriate. Updated informauon will inforrii
Ch�ter 7.Monitoriatg and Evnbration Pave 7- �
ORD.E Page 306 of 751
,� � a�
��T�°� _ Comprehensive Transportation Plan
� ~ WASHINGT4N
much of the evaluation process, enabling the City to quantify s.ystem changes over time and make
appropriate decisions in planning the future system.
M4DEL UPDA7ES
The Ciry's traffic model shall be updated on a regular basis, every few years, as new land use,
employment, and housing data becomes avaIlable. Model updates are important as they ensure the
City has an accurate understanding of how land use patterns, employmerit, and other factors
iin.paet future transportapon conditions, enabling the Ciry Council to make informed poliey
deeisions. The model also provides an understanding of the impacts associated with different
projects, allowing the City to devise a revised list of future projects to improve capacity and safety,
as well as achieve other priorities.
COiVIPREHEIVSIVE P�AN CONSISTENCY
The annual evaluation process is an opportuniry to ensure the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan is consistent with other elements of the City's Cqmprehen:rive Plan; including the land-use
element, economic development element; Auburn Park.r, Recreation ancl Open Space Plan,
Tran.i�oi�atzon Improvement Program, and Capital Facilities Plan. Hence, as part of the annual
amendment cycle, the Gity will ensure these plan components are consistent with and supportive.
of each other.
7.2 u1ti-Ye2�r IJpd�t�s
The Ciry has the opportunity to preform annual updates to the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan on an as needed basis to aceount for significant changes which have occurred during the
previous year. A more exhausuve process is periodically necessa.ry, hence, a thorough rewrite of
the Plan shall be conducted every five to eight years. This endeavor will include a broad public
outreach effort with inpu.t from neighboring jurisdictions, state and regional agencies,and Auburn
residents and businesses. Much like the process for the 2009 update,it will present an�pportuniry
to holistically examine the current transportarion systern and lay the framework for development
of the future system.
C/�upJc�r7.iLfonitorin�urrA .F..a�ulu,ution (��r�,�,�-�
ORD.E Page 307 of 751
Exhibit 8
AIJ�URN C011/IPREH�IVSI�/� P�A(V � �10�lJIVIE 6
Econornic Developrment Element
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT VISION
Auburn is a community fhat has a robust and diverse eeonomy where businesses seek to locafe,people desire
fo visit, and residents enjoy a range of commercial offenngs. Businesses thatlocafe in Aubum frnd if easy to
enfer fhe marketplace, encounter ideal condifions for their long ferm success; and become rooted and involved
in fhe community. Visifors continue fo return to Auburn beeause of ifs high qualify nafural resources,parks,
public spaces, and commercial attracfions. Residenfs choose fo live in Auburn because of fhe diverse,iamily
wage employment opportunifies and access fo entertainmenf,restaurant,refai!and services.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY
Historic T�ends: Historically, a variety of factors have shaped Aubum's economy. At the turn of the 20tn
century, the City offered services to support agriculture and,the railroads. Downtown offered a full range of
services and retail opportunities: In later years, automotive sales became a significant factor.
As urbanizafion of fhe region expanded to include Aubum, the vitality of Downtown Auburn was impacted
by new shopping malls located outside the community and by changing retail trentls. At the same time,
Aubum's importance as fhe home of large industrial and warehousing operations increased. This same
period saw the g�owth of retail along comme�cial "strips"such as Auburn Way and 15th Street NW. Large
retailers such as Fred Meyer and many major supermarket chains laeated in the community.
The development of the Supe�lVlall (now called.The Outlet Collection) in the 1990's led to Aubum becoming
a major player in the regional retail market. Auburn shoppers no longer needed to leave the City to visit
retail malls for many of their`purchases. During that same decade, Emerald Downs and the Muckleshoot
Casino a�so contributed to commercial recreation facilities in Auburn and associated employment growth.
Today, Auburn provides approximately 41,000 jobs for residents throughout the region. Aubum has a
strong industrial sector_that includes Boeing; the General Service Administration (GSA) and numerous
warehouse and distribution facilities. Multicare and the growing medical office community also provide a
significant number of jobs. The retail and senrice sectors are expanding as small businesses are created.
Educational 'uses such as ttie Auburn School District and Green River College also add to the area's
employment base.
While development has.continued throughout the City, Downtown Auburn remains the head and soul of the
community. Wth its historical character and pedestrian oriented development pattern, Downtown Auburn
, �
reflects many of the qualities bemg:sought by other communities. Given its urban center designation,
Aubum Station, and the incentives the City has in place, Downtown Aubum remains poised for continued
revitalization.
Employment Growth: Between 1995 to 2013, the number of jobs located in Aubum increased 46%.
Vllhile historically manufacturing jobs were the largest category,the 2010 Census indieates that service jobs
have are most dominant followed by manufacturing. The remaining job categories all experienced job
growth. Retail jobs increased substantially along with jobs in warehousing, transportation, antl.
communication industries.
It is expected that Aubum's employment base will continue to grow into the future. To the year 2031, the
King and Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies have assigned Auburn's job base to increase by just
over 20,000 jobs. It should be noted that this number is not a ma�cimum, but the City's most recent
assigned share of future projected growth in the County.
ORD:E Page 308 of 751
DRAFT ECONOi1111C DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015
Retail Sales: Auburn's business community is keeping pace with both Aubum's population growth and its
increase in more affluent households. Between 2005 and 2008; retail sales in Auburn increased 7% or
roughly 8%a peryear. With the implementation of streamlined sales tax in 2008 and the global economic
decline;sales tax revenues dropped by 16,5%in 2009. Since 2009 revenues have increased by 34%0.
Streamlined Sales Tax: The State of Washington adopted streamlined sales tax(SST)legislation in 20U8.
Prior to SST; sales tax collection in Washington State was based on the site of origin, rather than on the
site of delivery. U.nder the SST tax structure, sales tax is collected at the site of delivery rather than from
those areas from which they were shipped. This change in tax str�cture has put Auburn at a disad`antage
and negatively impact its tax revenue.
Specifically, Auburn and similar cities have historically invested in infrastructu�e to support businesses
engaged in warehouse and distribution activities that ship goods to ofher destinations. Another concem for
Aubum and similar cities that have invested in ir�rastructure include how the debt that has already been
extended for such infrastructure will be paid and how the loss of a significant source of revenue will affect
bond ratings.
Based on the potential passage of SST, the Aubum City Council approved Resolution Na 3782 in
November 2004. Resolution No. 3782 outlines an approach and actions the City will take related to land
use planning, zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax proposal or other similar
proposals that change the tax structure are adopted.
Because of the State ofWashington's implementation of sales taz mitigation payments to cities such as
Aubum, the impact resulting firom streamlined sales tax has been somewhat lessened. However,the
continued availability of fhese payments is not certain due in part to the State's current and anticipated
fiscal challenges. In addition,the amount of payments does not equal the total loss in revenue to the City.
The City's economic development strategies are tlependent upon the City being able to continue a strong
public investment program in infrastructure and senrices.The City's ability to continue triis public
investrnent is contingent upon maintaining solvent public revenue streams, particularly sales taz. Sales tax
comprises the largest source of monies to the City's General Fund, approximately 30 percent in 2010.The
City anticipates that cuirent and long-term fiscal challenges facing the State of Washington will likely results
in the dissolution of the currerrt sales tax revenue mitigation program.The eventual loss of the
aforementioned salestax revenue will direetly and adversely affectthe Cit�s ability to adequately fund the
capital ir�rastrueture and services necessary to support the realization of the City's economic developmer�
strategies.This is especially applicable to industrial areas supporting warehouse and distribution centers
that are origin based in nature.
In 2005 the City of Auburn brought together a focus group of diverse business and community interests that
identified several economic development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is �eflected in arr
Economic Development Sfrategies documeM that includes strategies and actions needed to affect
necessary change for specific strategy areas wifhin the city. Implementation of these strategies is intended
to enable the Gity to achieve the Cit�s economic development potential. Implementation of actions and
strategies in the Economic Developmenf Strafegies is appropriate and reflected in various elements of the
Aubum Comprehensive Plan:
Since the development of the Economic Development Strategies document; additional economic
development strafegy areas have been identified to include the SE 312th StreeU124th Avenue S€ corridor
within the recentiy annexed portion of Lea Hill and M Street SE between Aubum Way North and Auburn
Ullay South.
INTRODUCTION
OR . 9of751
Page � 2.
DRAfT ECOtUONTIC DEVE�OPMENT ELER�IENT NOVE�IJIBER 10,2015
In October of 2015 the City of Auburn initiated the process for developing a strafegic plan to guide the
City's economic development activities over the next 10 years. The plan will outline a key set of sfirategies
and actions that build upon the City's currerrt asset base and assist the City in overcoming challenges. The
plan will also facilitate the growth and expansion of existing industry and business sectors as well as
promote investment in targeted redevelopment corridors. Finally, the strategie plan will address both the
needs and impediments of existing business while defining approaches for attracting and cul6vating new
businesses.
The first phase of the project will involve a comprehensive communitywide stakeholder input process and
include detailetl community analyses that w'ill allow the team to understand Auburn's sfrengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. In the next phase of the project, the team will identify and refine
the Cit�s most promising economic development opportunities by conducting a market capacity study,
perception study, and target industry analysis. In the last phase of the project, the team w'ill identify specific
goals, strategies, and actions to capit.alize on its opportunities. The final plan will include an implementation
matnx that.assigns responsibility, outlines timing, and estimates costs.
The project aims to better position the City of Auburn as great places to live, learn,work, and play. The plan
will balance the needs of existing businesses with the need to expand and diversify the City's employment
base. The recommended strategies and actions w'ill increase employment in the City as well as its
commercial tax base.
_ __ _
The plan will be completed and approved by the Auburn City Council by August 31�2016. The Economic
Development Element of fhe City's comprehensive plan w'ill be amended to incorporate the findings,
specific goals, strategies, and acfions of the 10-year Economic Development Strategic Plan following City
Council approval.
Auburn's economic base drives and shapes the community and region. Auburn residents and the
suRounding region benefit from the jobs and seNices Auburn's economie base offers. Through fhe
payment of sales, property and other taxes, the City of Aubum can fund and provide services and public
fac'ilities which Auburn residents demand andlor require.
It is clearly in the City's best interest to maintain and expand our economic base in unison with
implementing all of the goals of this Comprehensive Rlan, This section of the plan will help to define the
City's goals and policies in this vital area.
Values:
Character. Our cultural diversity has been leveraged to bind our community,expand our market, and
celebrate cultural traditions.
Wellness: We are a safe community with walkable commercial districts where there the perception and
�eality is that crime activity is low antl public safety staffing meets ot exceeds fhe community's
expeetations.
Service: Our economic development strategies focus on supporting the existing business community;
as a result; recruitment is minimal because businesses desire to locate here.
Economy; We are able to measure and achieve defined targets for manufacturing, service, and retail
jobs and revenues.
Celebration; We actively promote our Iocal businesses and have been successful at making our
citizens more aware of what is available locally as well as attracting visitors from beyontl our City.
Environment: Our economy is growing and diversifying because of our efforts to protect our rivers,
streams, wetlands, and other environmental resources.
OR . 0 of 751
Page � 3
DRAFT ECQNOI�IiIC DEVELOPMENT ELEME(V7 NOVEMBER 1Q,2015
Sustainable: Residents are staying in Auburn to work and shop and we are widely considered to be a
regional dining, shopping and entertainment destination.
General Policies
GOAL 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
To ensure the long-term eeonomie health of the City and the region through a diversified economic base
that suppo�ts a wide range of employment opportunities for Aubum's residents and those of the region and
through the promo6on of quality industrial and commercial development which matches the aspirations of
the community.
Objective 9.1. Promote a diversified economic base capable of withstanding ehanges in interest rates,
inflation,tax sVucture and market conditions.
_ _ _
ED-1 City promotion of new industry shall be directed at attracting business that diversifies the City's
tax base, offers secure, qualify employment opportunities, is sensitive to community values and
promotes the development of attractive faeilities.
ED-2 Emerald Downs, the Muckleshoot Casino, and the Outlet Collection offer opportunities for
economic diversification that should be op6mized by the City.
ED-3 The importance of Downtown Auburn as a unique retail environment and subregional center of
commeree should be sonsidered in the City's economic plan.
Objective 9.2. Produce commercial and industrial siting policies which are based on the assessment of
local needs and fhe availability of transportation and other infrastructure required to serve it.
ED-4 Development of industrial areas should be based on performance standards appropriate for the
site and with appropriate flexibility within those standards to accommodate changing market
conditions.
ED-5 Revitaliie depreciated and/or obsolete commercial and industrial sites through innovative
regulations that redesign the site in accordance with modern design standards and
industrial/commercial uses.
ED-6 Uses which serve regional needs and purposes (such as major industrial plants) must be
separated from community serving uses in order to minimize traffic and other eonflicts.
Objeetive 9.3. Develop effective land use polices and economic development strategies that provide
long-term and stable employment, increase per capita income and reduce the tax burden of Auburn
residents.
ED-7 Aubum should continue to provide an economic base not only for the Auburn area but also for
the south King County and north Pierce County region.
ED-8 Implementation of economic development programs shall be consistent with the policies of this
Plan.
ED-9 The City should develop a formal economic development strategy as an element of the
Comprehensive Plan to specifically identify the types of businesses most eonsistent with
community aspirations and lay out a program to attract those businesses.
a. The City should work cooperatively with other governmental agencies in its economic
development efforts, including the Muckleshaot Tribe, King County; Pierce County, the Rort
and the State.
OR . 1 of 751
Paae � 4
ORAFT ECt)1�OMIC DEVELt�PMENT ELE(VIENT tUQVEIttIBER 10,2015
b, The City should implement its economic development strategy through a partnership with the
private sector.
c. Identified in the 2005 Economic Development Strategies documents are six strategy areas
along with two additional strategy areas. These economic development strategy areas are
targeted for population antl employment growth to meet the Citys 20-year (2031) growth
target. Su_b-area plans should be developed for these strategy areas. The economic
development strategy areas are as follows:
• Auburn Way North Comdor
o Auburn Way South Corridor
s Urban Center
• Auburn EnVironmental Park and Green Zone
• 15'h S�eet SW/C Street SWNVest Valley HighwaylSupermall
e A Street SE Corridor
• SE 312th Streetl124th Avenue SE Comdor
o M Street.SE between Auburn Way North and Aubum South
ED-10 Ensure that economic development sfrategies are reviewed regularly in order to be flexible antl
respond to changes in the market. ,
ED-11 The City should work with the private sector, school districts and Green River Gollege to develop �
programs to provide training. Consideration of special needs of economically disadvantaged ,
citizens and neighborhoods and people with physical impairments and developmental disabilities
should be included in these programs.
ED-12 Support continued development of the Sound Transit Commuter Rail system, as a.n important
means of expanding fhe City's and the region's economic base.
ED-13 City infrastructure plans and pcograms should take into consideration economic development
plans and programs.
ED-14 Implement the recommendations of the City's 2005 Economic Development Strategies brochure
including the add.ition of the SE 312th Street/424th Avenue SE comdor and M Street SE beiween
Auburn Way Nodh and Auburn Way South: The City's 20-year housing and employment growth
shall be concentr�ed to these economic development strategy areas.
ED-15 Warehouse and distribution land uses are not a preferred long-term economic development and
land use priority for industrial zoned areas in the Gity due to the loss of sales tax revenue
associated with the State's implementation of sireamlined sales tax legislation in 2008, no
substantive contribution to an increase in per capita income for Auburn residents, no reduction in
the tax burden of Auburn residents, low employment densities, lower property values and land
use inefficiencies.
ED-16 Increases in manufacturing and intlustrial land uses should be the City's preferred economic
development and land use priorify for industrial zoned areas of the City currently do.minated by
warehouse and distribution land uses. The City shoultl promote and incentivize new
manufacfuring and light industrial uses and the gradual conversion of existing warehouse and
distribution land uses to manufacturing and industrial land uses.
ED-17 To support contin.ued sales tax revenue growth opportunities in the City, those areas currently
dominated by existing and warehouse land uses that abut existing commercial retail areas and
coultl take advantage of this proximity to realize subsfantive value by changing to commercial
OR . _ - - - 2of751
Page � 5
DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER lp,2015
retail uses should be considered for changes in comprehensive plan and zoning designations
that would facilitate the conversion of thess properties to commercial retail land uses.
ED-18 Regulatory and financial incentives will be identified and implemented where appropriate to
provide increased opportunities and encouragement for the establishment of new or expanded
manufacturing and industrial uses and jobs in the City.
Objecfive 9.4 Maintain an adequate supply of land to support future economic development and assure
fhe ava'ilability of economic opportunities for future generations.
ED-19 Economic development programs should be viewed as a way to shape the character of the City's
future economy rather than merely respontl to market trends as they occur.
ED-20 Land suitable for large scale developmerrt in the Region Serving Area of the City should be
identified and designated for economic development.
a. The integrity of large, contiguously owned properties suitable for industrial use. should be
conserved by use of appropriate industrial subdivision standards.
b. The City should identify and resolve any environmental constraints affecting such land by
means of the appropriate environmental review procedures as early as feasible.
c. The need to support such land with the necessary infrastructure should be sonsidered in
the development of the City's public facility plans.
d. Innovative and flexible development regulations should be utilized to enable the development
of environmentally constrained sites while protecting those characferistics.
Objective 9.5 Utilize the City's unique environmental opportunities and planned infrastructure to build on
and support economic development efforts.
ED-21 Integrate the Aubum Environmental Park (AEP)into the City's economic development efforts by
encouraging compatible high tech businesses to locate in its vicinity.
ED-22 Utilize the future extension of I Street NE as an economic development opportunity.
Development of I Street NE should establish it as stand alone comdor and not a "back side"to
Aubum Way North. Conditional use petmit applications for commercial uses and nursing homes
along this corridor and whose impacts can be adequately mitigated should be supported.
ED-23 Use the M Street SE underpass and development of M Street SE and R Street SE bypass
connection as an opportun_ity to create and encourage the clustering of complementary business
and services in that area.
OR . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ 3of751
Page � 6
Exhibit 9
A►U�URIV COn/IPR�H�IVSIV� P�41V � VOLIJIiiIE 7
Parks and Recreation Elerv�ent
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT VISION
A diverse mix of park and recreation amenities,open spaces, and trails are dis�ibufed thro�ghouf tf►e City.and
accessible fo the majority of the populafiqn. Non-moforized frarls and paths connect resirlenfia!neigh6orhoods,
commercial centers, and ofher attracfions. People are visifingAuburn because of the robust invenfory and
qualify of park spaces and associafed event programming. Community facilifies are accessible and are serving
the needs of our seniors,youth, and fhe resf of fhe community,
INTRODUCTION
Adequate parks and recreation facilities are an essential amenity to maintain a suitable quality of life in the
community. As the population of Auburn grows, the demand'for its parks and recreational programs will
increase. To maintain Auburn's quality of life, the supply of these parks and programs must keep pace with
the demand placed on them by a growing population. `
Open space also plays a key role in the quality of life in an area. While many understand the concept of
the aitraction of the western United States and its"open spaces", the concept of open-space becomes less
clear when it comes to open space and its appropriateness to a City such as Aubum: The policies below
provide a definition of open space as applied to Aubum and its surroundings and provide a framework for
the identification and preservation of these ar,eas:
Values:
Character - Parks; art,;and open space are well designed and appropriately integrated into their
surrounding community.
Wellness - Recreation programs and park amenities are available and accessible to the entire
community.
Service;:- Awareness'of parks, trails, the arts, and park programming are delivered to residents,
empl,oyees a.nd visitors through a thorough mix of inedia:
Economy - Our parks, open spaees, and events are a draw to not only those who Iive and Work in
Aubum, but to those who reside,outside ofAuburn.
Celebration -0ur parks and open spaces are used to promote our history, our diversity, and the arts.
Environment - Pa[ks and open space are designed and operated in a manner that protects and
preserves the environment
Sustainable - Park facilities incorporate low impact development and sustainable development and
operation practices,
General Policies
Objective 1.1 To provide a broad and comprehensive park system fhat meets fhe recreational needs of
all segments of the eommunity.
Policies:
PR-1 The Auburn Park and Recreation Plan, as may be amended or updated in the future is hereby
adopted and incorporated as part of the Aubum Comprehensive Plan.
ORD.E Page 314 of 751
�RAFT PRNATE UTILITIES ELESVIENT NONEEVIBER lU,2Q15
PR-2 New developments shall contribute to the development of new parks at a level commensurate with
their share of new facility needs as established by the Park and Recreation Plan� tf the City
determines that the development does not contain an acceptable park site, the City shall require
the payment of cash in lieu of land: The funds shall be used to acquire land andlor develop
recreational facilities at a location deemed appropriate by the City. Criteria for site asceptability
and appropriateness shall be environmental limitations, accessibility, maintenance costs,
consistency with the Parks and Recreation Plan and the ability to meet more of the Community's
recreational needs by the coordinated development of parks located elsewhere.
PR-3 The City shall explore all rneans of funding the purchase of park land including, but not limited to,
bond issuanee,the collection of cash in lieu of land and federal,state or eounty grants.
PR-4 The City shall evaluate the impacts of new development:on 'parks and recreational resources
through the SEPA environmental review process, and shall take appropriate steps to mitigate
significant adverse impacts.
PR-5 The City recognizes the important recreational and transportation roles played by local and
regional trail systems. The City shall continue`to develop a sysfern°of separated trail facilities to
move residents fhrough our community and to adjoining communities: The local system should be
designed to link up with regional trails and designated bicyale routes on_roads. Safe routes along
existing and proposed roadways should be improved and marked for cyclists. The City should
continue to work with King County and other jurisdictions to.maintain existing facil'�ies and improve
non-motorized transpo�tation links: � �� ���
PR-6 The City shall continue to provide a broad variety of ;organized recreational and cultural
opportunities for all residents. Consideration of the-diverse intecests and abilities of our residents
shall be 'integral to the :development of athletic, cultural, specialized recreation and leisure and
educational programs and facilities offered Qr maintained by the City.
PR-7 The City shall establish and implement Level of`Senrice (LOS) standards for parks, parK facilities,
open space, and trails:
PR-8 Park impact°fees should be estab(ished`that help fund the future development of new parks, park
facilities,trail's, and acquisi�on�ofiopen space that meet the needs of an'increasing population.
Objective 1:��� To �provide�for an adequate and diverse supply of open spaces. O�pen space is�typically
defined as larid .that will remain undeveloped°or only lightly developed (a trail, for instance) and will be
managed to protect and enhance fhe;natural environment
Policies: �
PR-9 The City shall seek-to retain'as open space those areas: having a unique combination of open
spase values, including: ssparation or buffering between incompatible land uses; visual delineation
of the City or a distinct area or neighborhood of the City; productive wildlife habitat; weUands;
floodwater or stormwater storage; stormwater purification; recreational value; historic or cultural
value; aesthetic value; and educational value.
PR-10 The City shall seek to retain as open space areas where the soils have been identified as having
severe or very severe erosion potential,landslide hazard or seismic hazard.
PR-11 The City shall seek to retain as open space those areas that provide essential habitat for any rare,
threatened or endangered plant or wildlife species.
OR . 5of751
. Page � 2
�RAFT PR9VATE UTIL171ES EL�ME�lT NOVEMBER 10,2015
PR-12 The City shall seek to acquire open space lands which provide significant environmental or social
value, Such open space shall be managed to conserve and'improve the natural, visual, historic
and cultural resources associated with the land.
PR-13 All areas of Regulatory Floodway within the City shall be retained as undeveloped open space.
However, this shall not preclude the relocation of the Mill Creek floodway as long as any such
relocation is consistent with the requirements of the National Flood Insuranee Program.
PR-14 Development within areas designated for open space uses shall, in general, be non-intensive in
character. Development shall be designed and sited in a manner that minimizes or mitigates
disruption of the most important open spaee values of the site. Appropriate uses within designated
open space areas may, include (but not necessarily be limited to): parks and other recreational
facilities; agriculture; stormwater storage; and watershed. It is recognized that designating private
property for open space uses does nof establish or promote any public access nghts to such �
propertY�
PR-15 The City shall explore all means of open space,acquisition including outright purchase ofithe land
or the purchase of conservation easements.
PR-16 The City shall pursue opportunities to provide active and passive recreational opportunities and
enhance we�and and wildlife habitat within the Auburn Environmental Park generally locatetl north
of West Main Street, south of 15th Street NW beiween SR 167 and the Interurban Trail. Grant
funding and cooperative relationships with recreational and wildlife organizations shall be pursued
to implement this policy.
OR . 6of751
Page � 3
E��ibit 1 t�
2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS AND APPENDICES
Referenced Documents
• Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan
• Auburn Comprehensive Sewer Plan
e Auburn Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan
o Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan
s Kent Sehool Disfrict Capital Facilities Plan
o Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan
e Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan
Appendices: All Documents On File with the Auburn City Clerk's Office and at-
htt�://w.ww.auburnwa.�ov/doin� .business/community development/plannin�/comprehensiv
e plan/draft comp plan.hfm �
• Appendix A—Auburn Community Vision Report
• Appendix B—Auburn Housing Needs and Assessment I�
o Appendix C—Auburn Housing Element Checklist ,
• Appendix D—Auburn Health Impact Assessment
e Appendix E—Auburn Public Participation Plan
• Appendix F.1—King County Buildable Lands Analysis
o Appendix F.2—Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis j
o Appendix G—Auburn Airport Master Plan '
e Appendix H—Auburn Community Profile
• Appendix I—Auburn Greenhouse Gas Inventory
• Appendix J—Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Open 5pace Plan
ORD.E J Page 317 of 751
t* ��:o .� I;.� .�'.;,, �, t �'+ , ,,,j/ f��' B. !� 3.i; rJj� �J'fa
��a' "
,, "'� r i''�` ^.���'„�w-�`a� fl�-�u r ��'Cti ' �.:�i �r ,r . �Y ��`�� ,� � �
�� �. '-S ?�l .�;r,},. d f1 ! i 1 :,r. � y,.�!� — f . 1� /'�s f
..,. .w. .. � vF���Y��` .3 �+',�r ^T � .� J��� rr k.
� �1 f���. ���.'�� 'J-� s '.�
W y� �� f �k � 5 * ; r l
4 � , / � . .� ���.� ` /�� ��
• , . t
�.; i y.. �'Y .4='c: T � t..s�Yc i �• Y � ' (� �� � ; . f.'/�� �� }'
'� i1�' r� ��� f �� �'_ � � S ff !r= r�i�,�:r
. �.
.
� ���,�� • ` � ;. " - � r �y; ���y l «
i' . �� D � ' .,-,�.:-�� }. � f �,
� yby .J � '' 'i.�r� µ•t �f,�/ w �� ��� .
� � _
A. x � ��'C� $ e�� ,+ � _� �
.J ?.' ` � a A "�..�, v .
� f��'�:'� -�:;��,; '� a�,�:,��;;�, ',�; '� ,� r'' 1
..�a�,g�.��,, �. . •o� .. � �'. �,.
: � � ,� - • ��� :;�- �^
�,� ,� � �, V J �+' �
.Y r s ` t �' �g�y � -yS�� i l� ��"�7y��t
��� �ia . !�p � ��^ � f:i,t'!' f�T ,S/t+ w'��L�J,iFl�. �
�}�f� '47^
- u'�- ,. F `,t�l��tsf �, ��� ��}f 'rl 5li , �•.- "' , �Al�.!�s.'� .�:' r.
� Jl P r _ J'?► l Y � ` �1� .�''.w 1IiT t y' �"'` KiN,� Y � ��i • r
�,. �µ��������� � �, ;�t;.�.M �,'� i �, r �`I�" � T 4 i� g� f1 ;! .
' y} �,'A � • 1 �y i F`{�trY � � Y � ' .r
• r..
w
r� } , �� . i ' ;!3�') :� �e��' �el-...'� " �� ' .
.1 °5' ` r. .-?�4�t �'� .. ;,y� �^� ��f., ji,�°���',r i'�^ � t'�:. �`„a .'', �/Jr _ _ �
, . t�s �� ;..
, _. t •" a r' � . 1 .
�•.+f. , � .. x:w. '°y •� ' �,r+.:'� , t. �_ ` �''',r' - r� ���"��"�l" �'�f`�.:.cl+ ���f
- �{ 4 ,r r.
_ t. ., .. ` �-,,._, : � � r� � a 'y„� r� .
���� - �� � � ' + � •1 � 'L 'P��'��y�,,�7 � �� -^ ,+�. ���,, �-�' •�{l� .r�'•
t� .,� .� .� � 'I r -�'�f-� '� `L'� L' b` ',Ir� !., �., � .s�^t ..y.
.���'� �r ����'�g.n.*r y -t: .r;I��'' .�;ai�`�""' "�"+f� «+, x 0���,��+:*�^- ���+_��` _ ■
,�� .�� ,�. �,,�_� 9�.. `�.{ �� �.a �i �� > �rf� ' �
- +d K��i��T, . ' � : � ��Kq. ..� .{J.l,�.,'-i'�1.�`�������k.��lr
{y � ry�`p, � 'AI �� � , ����'.'��
'r- 4 . �ii�3 �ii - �� `v�7ci ; '�a r.:. 3- i���. •'_,}. vM C�'ic♦�'y� r 'J �� � ���. 'E.
� YI ,� ,�y� �� � �V � y �N� � s 6 �'Ii`" � '� �� � 1Y � � ��"��pl�y�/ J1.f
°=�'"�'S'� .''�, ` � � ��s�:-," �� , �,. .rF �� s-- �'i y„ �.�: ��+-:
� ��r:;, �w 3 _ '�„ A # ,,�a.. � ��t'��' ,� �.`� �� �::� 1'
�� �� �M�' >Ir . 1 �L' t iJ .� ��
:�. �Z
Y .
�-�� � z'�` ' '''��� _ ����y _� �r' , �' r.r � �
;� ' �,a . ir�»�`" � � s,�<+ yFr j ��,p.�
_;y�r• . �;►��• f+':.,. . � s�"`{i����`" a l�" �i ' _ M a�� �ti,� y �' �� ��� 7. � � a-� � .k.;tR
�"� r ,*�'L7.. `'�;� -,'}�. . 4 � ds { x` "� y, � u �' J� � t'�.' .-3 � 4�,{�l�
r.� .r ..Y. } {�(� t .,�.-w :�l`/, ,a�.,u� �,�! ,.�+0`�.��'r' �'.:%J7�. �v�f�rv.l)i��!'�..����
F`..+,-, , S _c;�'k' � �i`.>'�`+4*,,,�,- ��R� .+-•-_ � .�'"�.�4st t #.1��� �`� � ._iT�'��/
♦ . ;�� .�C�� �'� ,,+, J �4 S'��• � �'�', � `i-ww1�' ����.0
�� ♦.�' ^` �-'�v a �'t �`- �� M14��' � y I�`h��� J r i'���� =a�
��, �� '� ,� . v -.�.� f .ev . ,�{- , CS�S•-
,�. 1,.�, r.�� . ,� - �.� �.�; �t� r��� ,-
`�s�^ �-�� - .��y - Y,, -., ���l�'�` �,A.., r��` ;`�"a '�` �� :
._ � . , T�,..�1: �'`�w�:t �� t- c�...�L a�,�C.�������� f,i�
.� � ' ... �i�,��' t� f'.� ����.. ,i. ''r 4f,�' ,`ay�r�`.�/�..� � � ��'{
y�_�•� �� . Y:�s,�4����`ti�Nk�� ���f..
� :.L, a h� � �;- .r ���� a
.. ,_� �� :�.
�T ' ` r'M-,.�'1� ��..�.
Tx�,�..
- �':'�' x ~ ,' - - Y
, �I. �"� 6' ``. �SF 1 y�a � _ �i'�--
� ��� ". .a._..�.._l' �,—,
.
� _ .v, r. : . _ .:. ` � . �v t:.+�i� ' `" i�,t�'
. _ ., _
' _." '' .=`�:� __ , , .�- • . —.,, —- — �"�`l�
__
, �y.�.�`,- ''.�,
-_ .. '-. .__ _ •.,_ r�e_, _ " ' .a� T'
_ .
.. -
.: .�.._. � . .._ ...�_..._ „�: __ " �.
'
.. .....,.. .. .r. �..�._ ... ' ' . . . — • ' _ ;
-. � - _ �... _��,�+— _ �
-+,. - .� i
��„�w�µ�,,,� �� '-�— ^6 �4 ' � �"'r -. _ , — . �
__
_ .r«
..r
---. .. _ , �75 .
� � , �-.
.t�,,.�` ' .''�� � ,���' �x��•x {
'� � �� � " �� 3�
- , � fi � } . ia� ;- a � . .f�� �
�.l
. N' �
' � ; QI Y. ..` � � R ,\�{ � _ _ �._ . . i - �.
�
�
_
�,
r
�� �`
! y�
a _ M .. _ . 1
',
�"z.e' 1 M,. r� '�1$.4fu,�-.� '- � ! \ � /j'�-y
r �'�� � u�. � s iI'� : ' i���� _ - +Y. ," r�_''r•s ' �... f�
�
.
��� . V j`� - . .
i
� � Y / _ �� .. � � . , .
M r�
��. � ."�' T � t . ' -
�Y.' J �L . � .� � ��.�i� ilv'����� �� �� f .. ' . . �..\. .�•.
'�� ' '� ���y�f-�,� w ��� � �', � � �
y� � �` ..'�. ! v^
'_ .. ] 5 ��.'St�� r ~t � ,fs' ��y,+�,t �♦±�, l .�"" r'. 1�,,�'+,� •'A � -?i
. _
_ .,w,Jl�•'_ '! t'�, 'tMi , . � _ F .�r•.,�,yy. -�FA1 ` �� - . d'-'� . � ,� �,
..,�..-.- . . . � ,. `�,.
�
iy. .r , ��"`
.� �yti .. +�`e :G _ r � ��,,,� ,�.. ,Yi�� '.� "ao�". � '� `':i w
4 "s� • ,��r tiy; . y
' ,�ty+. �rFr' � ` �{� e�^' M�i� r` �"""wr �i+
�� �y, �y'!1/ +..,.K. �.- { c, � yT
� y � ��C�� ++ . " +�" r �? 4� .''' -9
�+. ' :� ` � 7
. ,
' � �r �.t �k �
' `, ,� �' `", 4'�nsr- �° ,,
�','�' � ar � v-� Y��'�'�t ,� �a� ,4�' +`` . �•'� - ' `' .
1r� tiy 4a � M
. � +t�� � ,� ',• T� `� ��e'�r�. ? ����� �{ Q� ,..�
��a;� pK p�: ,s�s ��,.t�� ,r- .�`i �,�x. ^^A..' �: .�-. ,q,;: , '" -
'ti. ' r a,"�` :. � C.'M `� �'F z,w�..�4r��,"��`',ap,�- '�'/ w.�� �i � ir �i +
� � 1 �.� 'h� _ ': , i�. � �,�1
4� '1V y � �.' _ � ��
.0� �1�� �,.}+i l,l �., �({}A} ' ��. - t�
�� .i . r .��� w+i 1
�,,�_ ��'G��j:i�� � � �a '� ��I
a ;x `_ :°- Y� �' ,1,, , T c -
` ,
.
_t. 't", •�'; � ��`j(��c,Y� � �ti� . !� �, �.
�»;� �� .,1.'2�,�, �"'V r'" � ��' -
'. - . *''�'r �. � t:'-., ` .
� ORD� -�. ���'' _ � Pa ��e,
�
.
� � . . , _
.
_ _ ��i `"ti. _ . '_ �`_:�"� F , .
_ -W ,__-� �._ --,.:. . `� �' '_ _
,.
i 't_� � � ti. . y� q;�
,�"�a+�',�.fi,� r�,.
4���� "`�# ,�!`��« �.�.7ti
& �
D RA FT ����� � � ��`� �-`��� ' ���
�� � �.�
�� : �,�, ��
���.� � ,��
� �, . �
��',. ���,��` �r;�-�. ;
TABLE OF CONTENTS �� - � . . �� ����b � �:� �q .- �
. ...,. :
� �. ��
�,�
i , !,
Chapter 1:Who Are We;What is a Parks Plan? ���� ;�-�"' '_��-� �� : "�
`��°� �-
,��� . ��� �, ��;�.
Chapter 2: Our Auburn Community ��� � '���� � ���'��
• Demographic Information '� � =w�� - �j��
� „�,�w �
• Geographic Setting and Natural Resources � '``�,���- �" �
• History of the Area � �� �'�--�`�
_�-����
����� � ���� � �
Chapter 3: Public Involvement � �
�����`.�� , `
• Public Participation Process ,� �. ..��" ` , �°
h �„.
• Public Survey �,�. � � `�"�� �_ �" � - .� � '"�
• Recreation Needs Assessment A�����.� �., � � `��� �� ' '� �� ��
•� �
z �.��, : .- -� �����j ��
• Existing&Future Park Land Needs ��-�� �,��' �_ � �.�
�
• Facility Needs �'�""'�,.�:� � ����' ._ �� �`�
=� '� ''_� .��- �'���`;�x�°�
��� �`,, �° ''.,�,�
Chapter 4: Goals and Policy ��.° f�. '"�� ��� ` � ��
r.�:; ,�, , .�.=q$J�°`£ ��� � ` ^
"` `� �',�._'� .� '� �*,�f
Chapter 5: Our Park System Today ��`�;;�� � ��`�����-��.��� ����.�.� ' ���
��-�>-� �.' �
nventory& Recommendations �-� � �� .�; � ,��
-�
,�., �,--�., -� �'� �
• Community Parks , �� �����.�.� �_ ,�� � �� � �.�� �
• Neighborhood Parks �-�� � � �` �
�..
• Special Use Areas �� �'-�`'�� � ��� '
, � �� A � ¢
• Undeveloped Open Space e--��=� t� � ��" P
-��, � � -
_ :` ; � -,� ._ ��� ' i,+
Chapter 6: Recreation and Cultural Programs ,�,,,,�.����x� `�ti�� � ��``-�°��
• Athletic Programs �`�°
• Leisure and Education Programs �r ��� � ���� � ��
• Health &Wellness Programs
• Heritage and Preservation Programs � ° ��t � �
, �
• Cultural Programs:Arts&Events � 'P � ' '� `�
,�� x�' �' � � '���
� � � ti
Chapter 7: Open Space Defines a Community -� �.
Chapter 8: Auburn Trails `rt" �"°� ,-�- •�..�. `
.w�. _ .�a.y
� - � .�, �-.
Chapter 9: Getting It All Done �� �� "°` �"""�= `� � ���
� �r, ���
4 '. Y'� 'a �d W�:'<'d
• Parkand O en S ace Needs ����� �� �
P p '°, ��� �.H, °: � �``
• Recreation Facility&Program Needs � � �^���?� �� ���"�� � , ,;��'
�'�� "9m� ?� a,���'`�� r� �., ,r
• Financing Improvements � �, �� •,
�u�u�� � � . �
..
�,..� �, � � ;�,u
� �,�'� ���^" � ��
ORD.E
�
�
�
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 320 of 751
� Chapter 1
Who are We
What is a Parks Plan?
The complex puzzle of the Parks and Recreation Department properties, programs and people
are demanding jobs. It is accomplished through the joint efforts of six citizen boards, 50
permanent City staff members, approximately 50 seasonal workers, more than 100 part-time or
contract instructors, coaches and recreation support staff, and more than 500 volunteers.The
following pages describe each of these groups. Working together, they see our parks are
attractive and well-maintained and the programs meet the needs of Auburn residents.
The Auburn Parks and Recreation Department
From a modest two person staff in 1969,the Parks and Recreation Department has developed a
comprehensive program of recreation, heritage and cultural arts activities, park maintenance
and new park development keeping a full-time staff of over 50 very busy. The Parks
Department consists of eight divisions, each of which is responsible for a specific type of task.
The divisions are:
Administration
Golf Course
� Arts and Events
White River Valley Museum and Mary Olson Farm
Mountain View Cemetery
Park Facilities and Maintenance
Recreation Programs
Senior Activity Center
A short synopsis of the responsibilities of each division follows; some of these are described in
more detail in other sections of the Park Plan.
Administration
The Administrative staff consists of the Parks and Recreation Director, the Parks Planning and
Development Manager and administrative staff. The Director oversees the activities of the
entire department, and reports directly to the Mayor.
Golf Course
The Auburn Golf Course is a full service 18-hole golf facility nestled along the Green River and
situated on 150 acres. City services include a full service pro shop, tournament and league
organization and scoring, golf club and power cart rentals, professional instruction and lessons,
tournaments and leagues. The City of Auburn leases out the beautiful restaurant and banquets
�
� ORD.E Page 321 of 751
facility to an outside concessionaire. The concessionaire provides a full service restaurant and
bar menu as well as a overseeing a banquets/event space that hold up to 150 persons. The
concessionaire also operates the beverage carts on the golf course. The City of Auburn
employees 8 full time employees and approximately 10 temporary workers to assist with the
overall operation.
Arts and Events
Arts programming includes five major programs and events.These are community art
programs, access, facilities, education, and resources for artists and organizations.The Cultural
Programs Manager, with the assistance of the Cultural Programs Coordinator and part time arts
assistant, manages this expanding program. A substantial group of volunteers assists at
performances, major events, and support.
White River Valley Museum and Mary Olson Farm
The White River Valley Museum is the City's central site for heritage and arts enrichment and
educational programming. It is located in the Auburn Community Campus in Les Gove Park.The
Museum is managed through a partnership of the City of Auburn and the White River Valley
Historical Society.The Museum was built and furnished by the White River Historical Society.
The City pays the wages of a fulltime Museum Director, a .5 FTE Curator of Collections, a
fulltime Curator of Education and a % FTE Assistant Educator.The Director is responsible for the
overall administration of the facility and reports to the Director of Parks Arts and Recreation.
The Historical Society earns revenue to pay for a .4 FTE Volunteer and Facility Coordinator, a .75
FTE Bookkeeper. Volunteers and volunteers provide much of the help needed to maintain the
collection and provide visitor services.
Since 2001 the Historical Society has leased the built environment of the Mary Olson Farm (a
City of Auburn Park) for the purposes of restoration and programing.Through this partnership
the Farm is now fully restored and open summer weekends for drop in visitors. It is the site of
an extensive fieldtrip program wherein 1000s of students learn about stream ecology and food
production.
Mountain View Cemetery
This public cemetery is well-known for its lovely site and outstanding views of Mount Rainier
and the Green River Valley. Cemetery staff maintain the 30-acre site and are responsible for an
average of 275 urn and 275 full burials a year. Five full-time staff and three seasonal workers
maintain and operate the Cemetery.
Park Facilities and Maintenance
The Maintenance division is responsible for the care and renovation of 38 City park properties,
more than 30 street right-of-way beautification areas, and the grounds at all Municipal
Buildings including City Hall, the Justice Center, Parks and Recreation Administration Building,
ORD.E Page 322 of 751
� Museum, Les Gove Multi-Purpose Building, Veterans Park Kitchen Building, Senior Activity
Center, and the Auburn Valley Humane Society. In the downtown Auburn business area they
maintain the grounds of 8 City owned parking lots, 144 hanging baskets and all of the landscape
beds along Main Street and Division. This division employs 15 full-time staff with an additional
position to be added in 2016, and 12 seasonal workers.
Recreation
Auburn's Recreation Division provides opportunities for the public to participate in diverse
recreational programs and activities designed to meet the needs of the community. These
programs include preschool, youth,teen, and adult leisure programs; youth, teen, and adult
athletics; fitness and wellness programs; programs designed to provide social and recreational
opportunities to senior citizens and those with special needs, and a host of special events
suitable for the entire family and community at large.The division also offers a gymnasium for
open gym and organized activities, and several options for facility rentals, including buildings,
picnic shelters, and fields. The Recreation Division is under the direction of one manager, five
Recreation Coordinators, one Recreation Specialist, a Recreation Clerk, dozens of temporary
staff and contracted instructors, and hundreds of volunteers.
Senior Activity Center
The Senior Activity Center provides recreation, education, health, nutrition and outreach
services and legal information to citizens, age 50 and older. This is accomplished with 3.5 full-
� time staff, and more than 20,000 hours of volunteer assistance using approximately 180
volunteers.
Public Input to the Parks & Recreation Department
Seven committees, comprised of Auburn residents, provide input to the Department on a
regular basis. These are the Parks and Recreation Board, the Senior Center Advisory Council,
the Urban Tree Board, the Cemetery Board, and the Auburn Arts Commission, and the White
River Valley Museum Board. Additionally, the Library Board,the Auburn Youth Council,the
Men's and Women's Clubs at the Golf Course give direct input to the Department regarding its
divisions. These committees provide the public voice ensuring activities carried out by the
Department meet the needs of a broad-based constituency.
Park and Recreation Board
Advises the Mayor and City Council on planning, development, acquisition and management of
City parks, recreation facilities and programs. The Parks and Recreation Board consists of seven
members who serve three-year terms.
Regular meetings are held the Tuesday following the first Monday of each month at 5:30 PM at
the Auburn Senior Activity Center located at 808 9th St SE, Auburn.
Senior Activity Center Advisory Council
�
ORD.E Page 323 of 751
The Senior Activity Center Advisory Council is a 17-member committee appointed by the Senior
Center Supervisor. It serves as a sounding board, helping staff to make decisions on Center
services and activities and on general operation of the facility. The group meets monthly to
evaluate recent activities, give input on current and future programs, and review suggestions
from Center participants. Members serve a two-year term with half of the group rotating out
each year to allow continuity in the group.
The Senior Center Advisory Board normally meets the third Tuesday of each month at 10:00 AM
at the Senior Activity Center, 808 Ninth St. SE.
Urban Tree Board
Through education and involvement, the Tree Board of the City of Auburn provides information
and advocacy for "choosing the right tree for the right place," helping Citizens understand the
value of proper pruning techniques and in managing an urban forest that is ever changing and
needs to fit into the environment of this community. Board emphasis is on trees in public
rights-of-way and on City-owned property. The Board is made up of five members who serve
three-year terms. Regular meetings of the Board are held the first Tuesday following the first
Council meeting of the month in the Parks Admin Building at 910 9th St. SE, Auburn.
Cemetery Board
Advises the Mayor and City Council on policy matters relating to long range planning, capital
improvements,fee structure, cemetery expansion, rules and regulations, and budget for the
cemetery. The Board consists of five members who serve five-year terms.
Regular meetings of the Board are held the second Tuesday of each even-numbered month at
2:00 PM at Mountain View Cemetery located at 2020 Mountain View Drive, Auburn.
Arts Commission
Within its funds appropriation,the Arts Commission may, alone or in cooperation with any
other private, civic or public body of any city, county or the State of Washington, initiate,
sponsor or conduct programs calculated to further public awareness of and interest in the
visual, cultural and performing arts. The Board consists of twelve members who serve three-
year terms.
Regular meetings of the Commission are held the first Tuesday of the month at 4:30 PM in
Conference Room 1 located on the first floor of the City Hall Annex, One Main Building.
White River Historical Society Board
Develops policies for White River Valley Museum operations and management of collections,
long-term plans for the Museum, and docent programs and other volunteer activities. Board
membership is comprised of nine members elected by the general membership of the Historical
Society, and eight members are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council.
ORD.E Page 324 of 751
Regular meetings of the Board are held the third Wednesday of each month at 1:30 PM at the
White River Valley Museum Muckleshoot Room, located at 918 H Street SE, Auburn.
Why a Park Plan?
The Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes goals for cities and counties to assure that
their quality of life is sustained as their communities grow. One of these goals
is to "retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat,
increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreational
facilities" (RCW 36.70A.020(9)).
Every few years the City of Auburn looks at its parks and its recreation programs and evaluates
how well they're working and how they can be improved.The last plan was written in 2005,
and many changes have occurred in Auburn since then. Between 2004 and 2014 (Population
data for 2014 is an estimate) our population grew by nearly 40%, and constructed over 3,938
new homes and apartments. The demand for recreational space increases with the population.
In addition, more flexible work schedules mean the parks are no longer just a weekend
destination. Our city parks are used from dawn to dusk, seven days a week, by people of all
ages. All these things continue to add up to a system of parks that are heavily used and
enjoyed. Periodic improvements and renovations of existing parks, as well as additions to the
park system, are necessary to meet the needs of new and old users alike.This plan is intended
to update the current Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and assess recreation trends and
needs of our residents and user groups. It will focus on what can be achieved over the next six
years, and will be tied to the City's Capital Facilities Plan. This will enable park project funding
and development to be coordinated with other City and Community projects.
There are four objectives to be achieved through the production of this plan:
1. Provide guidance for the Parks and Recreation Department
2. Provide input to the citywide Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
3. Maintain funding eligibility for grants
4. Comply with the Growth Management Act
�
ORD.E Page 325 of 751
1. Provide guidance for the Parks and Recreation Department in the following areas:
• park and open space land acquisition
• recreation facility development, and
• recreation program development
The planning process used in this document evaluates the property for which the Parks
Department is responsible and the recreational programs it sponsors. The Plan makes specific
recommendations for the present and near future, and general recommendations for the
longer term. Information gained in this process will determine whether additional parks are
needed, where future demand is expected to occur, and where land should be acquired to
meet current and future needs. It will also provide information about the changing general
recreation interests of Americans, and Auburn residents specifically.This process provides
direction for the continuing success of our many recreation programs.
2. Provide input to the citywide Capital Facilities Plan (CFP).
The City of Auburn maintains, and periodically updates, a coordinated plan for providing and
financing major public facilities. These are projects that require a substantial investment of
money and planning to complete. The construction of a!I new parks, and the substantial
renovation of any existing parks, are included in the CFP where they are evaluated against other
City needs, such as construction of new sewer lines or development of a new fire station. Based
on available budget and urgency of need, each project in the CFP is given a priority and
assigned a date when it is anticipated to be accomplished. The Park Plan prioritizes the large
scale investments needed for parks and open spaces for the years to come.
3. Maintain funding eligibility for grants.
Most sources of county, state and federal funding for parks and recreation facilities require
funded projects be reflected within an up-to-date park plan.This ensures such funds are used
efficiently and for projects with clearly recognized benefits. Examples of such funding sources
include the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), and the King County
Conservation Futures Fund. The continued ability to successfully compete for outside funding is
critical to our ability to provide an excellent park system.
4. Comply with the Growth Management Act(GMA)
The Growth Management Act passed in 1991 recommends cities and counties develop
recreation plans that complement the expected land development pattern of the community.
The Land Use element of the Comprehensive Plan requires the identification of existing and
future public facilities, such as parks and trails. The Growth Management Act also requires us to
"identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas." They include lands
useful for recreation, wildlife habitat,trails, and connection of critical areas."
5. Develop Implementation & Funding Strategy
The Plan outlines the needed park, art, and recreation facilities for the future in the City of
Auburn. Funding strategies of the current sources and those needed in the future are noted in
ORD.E Page 326 of 751
the Plan. The Implementation section of the Plan guides park development and improvements
by answering the questions of; where, when, and estimated costs as they relate to the CIP.
Currently only developments over 50 units provide park land or fee in lieu of park land.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) dollars, State and Federal grants, and donations provide the only
funding sources for parks acquisition and development. Potential Funding sources for parks and
programming include:
• Capital Improvement Plan
• Special Serial Levy
• General Obligation Bond
• Revenue Bond
• HUD Block Grants
• Park Impact Fees
• Park Mitigation Fees
• Certificate of Participation
• Private Utility Tax
• Councilmanic Bond
• Donations
• Public Land Trusts
• Lifetime Estates
• Exchange of Property
• Joint Public/Private Partnership
• Private Grants and Foundations
• Urban Forestry Grants
• National Tree Trust
• Parks, Arts, and Recreation Organizations
• Municipal Art Fund
• Miscellaneous Grants Managed by RCO
• Land and Water Conservation Fund
• Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account
• Washington State Arts Commission Grant
• National Endowment for the Arts
• Hotel/Motel Tax
• Conservation Futures
Strategy
The Park and Recreation Board, and the City Council will implement a priority list for
establishing funding for the next 6 years of this Park Plan.
What's Happened Since 2005?
Over the course of the last decade the City's inventory of parks properties has expanded.The
list of parks and park properties that have been added include West Auburn Lake, 104th Ave SE
�
ORD.E Page 327 of 751
property along the Green River, 215Y Street Playground, Dorothy Bothell, Kersey A, Kersey B,
Riversands, and Lakeland Nature Area. In addition Lea Hill Park and the Discovery Playground
were constructed since the last Park Plan update.
Notable redevelopment efforts and renovations have taken place at the Auburn Golf Course,
Brannan Park, Fulmer Fields, Game Farm Park, GSA Fields, Isaac Evans Park, Dykstra Park, Indian
Tom Park, Cedar Lanes Park, Rotary Park,Terminal Park, Veteran's Memorial Park, Roegner
Park, and Les Gove Park, and Mountain View Cemetery,.
How This Plan is Organized
Updating the existing Park and Recreation Plan is not difficult due to the good ground work
done in past years by the City Council, the Parks and Recreation Board and parks and recreation
staff, its complexity arises due to the many facets which must be examined and digested in
order to produce a useful document.
Major Findings of this Plan
Although this plan and its recommended actions are fairly detailed, it can be summarized in a
few major points:
1. Take care of our existing inventory of parks and facilities;
2. Expand our park system to meet the needs of our growing population,;
3. Ensure open spaces are maintained, both for the quality of life that they add to our
community, and their environmental and wildlife value;
4. Continue to strive to meet the varied recreation needs of all segments of the
population; and
5. Prioritize and find funding sources to maintain the current level of services that the
Parks Department provides prior to taking on new facilities.
The following items look at each goal in slightly expanded detail. The remainder of the Plan can
be referred to for more in-depth coverage of each topic.
1. Continuing Care for Existing Parks: Auburn residents overwhelmingly felt existing parks
should receive highest priority. Chapter 5, Our Park System Today, discusses each park
individually and provides recommendations for improvement.The review of existing parks finds
our park system is reaching an age when both minor and major renovations are needed.The
Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires the City of Auburn make parks accessible
to all persons. Maintaining aesthetics and keeping up with the times were strong factors in
determining the recommended renovations in this plan.These include improvements such as
landscaping, water conservation irrigation systems, and new site furnishings.
2. New Parks and Facilities: To help assess the wants and needs of the citizens of Auburn
we conducted an online Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey of 600 Auburn residents in
Spring 2015. Although there is some similarities between different communities, standards are
individualized to meet the unique needs and interests of the local population. The standard for
park acres currently in the City of Auburn is 6.03 acres per 1000 residents.This will maintain our
ORD.E Page 328 of 751
neighborhood, community and linear parks at their current level. Although Auburn has some of
the best recreation facilities in the area, our recent population growth are placing pressure on
existing resources. A critical lack of indoor facilities is restricting the City's ability to provide a
complete range of recreation programs and opportunities.The plan and staff recommends
minimum development of the following recreation facilities to meet current demand:
• 119 Acres of Community Park space
• 11 Softball and youth baseball fields
• 2 Soccer/Football fields
• 10 gymnasiums
• Recreation/transportation trails to connect the different planning areas of the City (i.e.
West Hill, East Hill, and SE Auburn).
All standards and descriptions of current and future needs for parks and the facilities are fully
detailed in Chapter 3, The Community Attitude & Interest Citizen Survey and Park Board and
staff recommendations.
3. Open Space:The topic of open space is included in the City of Auburn Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Plan. This is partially in response to the Growth Management Act, which
requires we plan for open space, but is also in response to local interest in maintaining green
spaces and environmentally sensitive areas. The plan for open space outlined in Chapter 7 and
proposes a new Open Space Program that would seek to conserve significant natural resources,
and in some cases acquire and manage land as open space. A system of greenbelts which
interconnect and provide travel corridors for people and/or wildlife is recommended.
4. Meeting the Recreation Needs of All Residents:
The City can offer a broad range of classes, activities, league sports and community events
appealing to persons of all ages and abilities. An overview of the recreation programs currently
offered by the City reveals an excellent series of programs hampered by a lack of space.The
construction of a community center, which will be completed in Summer 2106, is critical to the
continued development of recreation programming in Auburn.
A few of the identified recreational needs for the community include improved programming
for youth, a wider selection of adult classes and activities, and expanded programs for the
diverse needs of retirees and senior citizens, who now range from age 55 to 95. Space needs
are also high on the list:
• Activity areas for teens, multipurpose space for classrooms, and exercise rooms for
aerobics/fitness
• Gallery space, studio space, rehearsal space, and small performance areas
• Community meeting rooms/classrooms
• Walking and running areas
� I
ORD.E Page 329 of 751
The Challenge Ahead
Accomplishing the tasks laid out in this Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan are a
continuation of the existing Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. Many of the actions
recommended are already underway.
The key to achieving the large vision is to continue to identify what needs to be done, and to
begin methodically executing those tasks.This plan begins to identify and prioritize the tasks.
The recommendations and conclusions found in Chapters 3 through 8 are compiled and
summarized in Chapter 9, and for some this will be a logical starting point. Others may want to
know the whys and hows of the plan's development and then the conclusions. It is
recommended you read straight through the plan.
ORD.E Page 330 of 751
ORD.E Page 331 of 751
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 332 of 751
� Chapter 2
Our Auburn Community
Parks -- Creating Community through People, Parks and
Programs
In making decisions about the future direction of our parks, open spaces, and recreation
programs, it is vital to know something about who we are.The age of our citizens, where they
live, their hobbies and recreational interests, and our predicted population growth—all of these
facts and trends inform us how our recreational spaces and programs can be designed to serve
the city's diverse population. This chapter concentrates on two of Auburn's most important
resources: its people and its land. Both are vital to the decision making process. Who our
citizens are will influence their preferences and expectations for recreational opportunities.
And the geographic setting serves as the "canvas" upon which we can design our system of
parks and open spaces.
Planning Area
The plan for this study includes all areas within the city limits of Auburn. Parks Iocated in nearby
unincorporated areas are discussed briefly in order to understand how the City's system fits
into the broader context of the region, however development of these parks do not usually
occur outside the existing City limits.
Community Profile and Population Changes
Population Estimates (chart)
Population figures for 1990,2000 and 2010 are based on actual counts of persons in each household. ln each of the
intervening years our population figures are estimates reviewed by the Washington Srate Office of Financial
Management. Population numbers are not updated each year for the various categories discussed in the remainder
of this section, therefore 2010 figures will be used to discuss who our residents are.
Auburn
1990 33,102
2000 40,314
2010 70,180
2014 76,347*
2025 84,948*
2030 89,868*
2035 94,788*
*projected estimates
Every ten years the U.S. Bureau of the Census performs a detailed population count of all
residents of the United States. Data from the 2010 Census reveals a great deal of information
ORD.E Page 333 of 751
about who we are. One of the most basic pieces of data provided by the Census, which is useful
to cities, is the overall population count. For example,the Census shows Auburn's population
increased from 40,314 in 2000 to 76,347 in 2014. (See note about population estimates in side-
bar) Recent growth, as well as projected growth, is attributable mainly to annexations and/or
the construction of new housing in the recently annexed areas. If Auburn continues to grow at
its current rate, and if it incorporates its potential annexation areas as planned, then by the
year 2035, its population will be approximately 94,788 people. Other 2010 Census data relevant
to this Park Plan, which will be considered in the decision-making process, are listed below:
• Population by Age Group
• Households by Type
• Population by Race
• Housing
• Income
Population by Age Group
The population is measured in increments of five years of age, from 0 to 85+. Each of these
increments shows an increase in numbers.. Much like the 2000 Census data, the 2010 data
indicates that the largest increases in population group was 35-60 year-old adults.
Significance of Age Groups for the Park Plan:
Recreation programming adjusts by specific age groups, as population increases and decreases
in the various segments. Auburn's large population of children, from infants to nine year-olds in
2010, will affect our recreation programming for years to come. Increased numbers of
recreation classes, or an increase in class size, may be necessary to meet the needs of this
group as they mature. The same is true of adults, ages 35 to 60.
As our middle aged and older populations experienced the largest increases in growth, it
continues to be necessary to provide additional programming that meets the specialized
interests of these groups.
Family Composition
Families composition (with and without children) comprise the largest segment of Auburn's
population. In the year 2010 Census, Auburn had a total of 26,051 households. Families with
children comprise just over one-third of Auburn's total households.
Population by Race
Auburn's population is almost 79%white. Although this is a majority, the number and
percentage of people of color is increasing in Auburn. Between 1980 and 2000 total figures for
people of color almost tripled, from 1,611 individuals to 6,932.The greatest increase in actual
numbers was in the Latino and Native American category, while the largest percentage increase
was in the Latino population. Although not strictly a consideration of racial composition, staff
ORD.E Page 334 of 751
observation and immigration trends reveal that this part of King County is seeing a larger
increase in Latino residents.
Significance of Racial Composition for Park Plan:
Facilities should be designed to take advantage of different cultural interests and histories.
Possible facilities and programs are:
• Educational programs that acknowledge ethnic differences and celebrate diversity.
• Events that celebrate traditional holidays and occasions of the Muckleshoot Indians,
Latino, Black, and Asian populations.
• Facilities designed using the artwork of, or in the historical style of, one or more of these
cultures.
Housing
Auburn's 131% population growth increase in the 24 years between 1990-2014 means that
there is also a significant increase in new home construction. Much of this construction is in
multi-family units, in mobile homes and manufactured housing. The city has a total housing
stock of about 26,051 dwelling units in 2010, which is a 59% increase in the total number of
housing units since the year 2000. In 2000,46%of Auburn's housing units are single family, 42%
are multi-family and 12% are mobile homes. According to the Year 2010 Census,the number of
owner-occupied housing units was just under 60% and the number of renters was about 40%.
Significance of Housing for Park Plan:
Increases in multi-family housing and decreases in average house lot size mean that most
people have smaller yards or no yard at all. For some this is an advantage, but for those with
young children or with active recreational interests, it means that public parks and open spaces
become even more vital. As a result, the following will be needed:
• New parks to meet the demands of increasing population numbers.
• Developer impact fees paid by each new household to contribute to the additional new
park space that will be needed or parks will be developed to meet city standards.
• Connecting routes to the natural environment from new residential development via an
open space/trail system.
Income
Table 2-1
Median Household Income—2010
Auburn King County
$55,483 $71,811
�
ORD.E Page 335 of 751
Household income levels in Auburn are one of the lowest in King County; however,the city also
has some of the lowest housing costs in the county. Table 2-1, using data from the 2010 census,
shows the difference in income between Auburn and King County. Auburn also has a
substantial number of households that fall into the low and very low income categories. More
than 53%of households in Auburn are considered "low income", which is defined by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a household with a total yearly
income equal to, or less than, 80% of the King County median household income. "Very low
income" is defined as a household with an income equal to, or less than, 50% of the King
County median household income. About 31.7% of Auburn households fall into the very low
income category.
Significance of Income Levels for the Park Plan:
Data shows that people with lower incomes tend to recreate less than those with higher
incomes. However, it may also be true that populations with less financial flexibility need local
recreational resources more than those who can afford vacations outside the city or state. The
City may respond to the needs of our less affluent citizens with some of the following methods:
• Recreational and educational programs designed to meet special needs, such as:
1. Scholarships for needy participants, which are based on family income and are
available at 100%, 75%, 50% and 25%a levels. The Parks and Recreation Department
may want to evaluate this existing program to see if it is sufficient to meet the needs
of Auburn residents.
2. An increased number of"no-cost" or "low-cost" programs
3. Programs devoted to improving skills or money management
4. Child care during evening programs, especially those oriented to low income or
single-parent households.
5. Continuation and expansion of free community sponsored events
• It may be advisable to expand programs for special population groups such as teens, the
developmentally disabled, and senior citizens, and include exploration of providing
transportation, on-site counseling and mental health services, adult day care, expanded
health services and more.
• Good geographic distribution of parks throughout the community will be especially
beneficial to low-income families. Parks are ideally located within walking distance of
most residential neighborhoods.
Geographic Setting
Auburn's location in the Puget Sound region has a great influence on the City as it exists today
and in the future. Originally, geography was a driving force in the development of the region.
Auburn's proximity to rivers made it an early transportation center for both Native Americans
and settlers. As the fertile valley began to be farmed, train tracks were installed to move
ORD.E Page 336 of 751
� important food crops and timber from the rural towns, like Auburn,to the larger cities of
Tacoma and Seattle.
In the 1990s, Auburn's south King County location made it a prime target for growth as the
entire Puget Sound region experienced a rapid influx of new residents. Auburn's 1990
population, of approximately 30,000, took a 131%jump to over 76,347 in 2014. Although
population is not expected to continue growing at this rate, Auburn is still seen as a desirable
community in which to live due to its image as a family-oriented small town. Its low real estate
costs, compared with most of King County, its ease of access to highways and its small town
atmosphere will continue to attract steady growth. This growth will create a continuing need
for recreation facilities.
Topography
Topography refers to the configuration of surface features of the land—from minor changes in
elevation to riverbeds, mountains and other natural features. Topography is significant because
it affects how and where human activity occurs. Flat, dry areas were traditionally developed
first. These kinds of sites easily accommodate the construction of houses, roads and other
structures. They are also well suited to park development, which often requires broad, flat
expanses for the development of sports fields and other recreation facilities. Hills, steep slopes
and poorly drained soils pose construction challenges for both parks and other uses. The
dominant topographical features of Auburn consist of a broad,flat valley bordered on the east
by the Green River and Lea Hill, with the West Hill forming the western edge of the city.These
hillsides create distinctive edges that contain immediate views within the city, but still allow
unobstructed views of the Cascades and Mount Rainier. The hillsides also create barriers for
physical connections between the various districts of the City. The White River in the southern
part of the city creates an edge between the more developed portion of the city and the more
rural. The city has followed a typical pattern of development, with growth occurring in the
valley in the early days of settlement, and in the recent past. Most city parks are also located on
sites in the central valley. As this area reaches its capacity for development, development
activities have shifted to the recently annexed areas in the western, eastern, and southern
portions of the City.
Significance of Topography for the Park Plan:
While the slopes of some hillsides are too steep and unstable for construction of conventional
park facilities, they may be suitable for open space designation or non-motorized trails.
Topographic constraints are not an issue in the remaining unoccupied valley locations, which
might be considered for park sites. In the west part of the valley floor, wet soils and high
ground water are common, making development of these sites more difficult. These conditions
would, however, allow some interesting opportunities for pedestrian scale recreation and
education.
Drainage
ORD.E Page 337 of 751
Auburn has a system of rivers and creeks that are valuable for their drainage, flood control, fish
and wildlife habitat, visual interest, historical value, and recreational opportunities.The Green
River, White River, Mill Creek, Bowman Creek, Olson Creek, Mil) Pond and White Lake all
provide fascinating glimpses into Auburn's past.The integral r'ole that these bodies of water
played in earlier decades has changed over the years, but is no less valuable.
Mill Creek, in west Auburn, is a small stream that passes through open wetlands, retired
pastures, and fields. Earlier in the century, portions of the Mill Creek channel were realigned
and redesigned to accommodate farming activities. With the demise of farming here, Mill Creek
is returning to its original drainage function. The presence of wetlands along much of its
corridor precludes extensive development, although some industrial properties are already
present.
Although historically the alignments of the rivers were altered by human activity, and the banks
were engineered to contain the river during flood events, multiple levee setback projects within
the City have created areas that are appropriate for linear pedestrian trails. White Lake and
West Auburn Lake are the only naturally occurring lakes or ponds in the city. West Auburn Lake
was recently acquired by the City and represents a recreational opportunity for a natural area
in a highly urbanized area. White Lake, located just south of Highway 18 is presently in private
ownership and not available for public use. Should the area eventually be developed, White
Lake would be a very desirable recreation amenity.
Significance of Drainage for the Park Plan:
In the past couple of decades the City has begun to take advantage of the recreational
opportunities provided by these drainage areas, with the construction of Isaac Evans Park on
the Green River, and Game Farm Park, Game Farm Wilderness Park, Reddington Trail along the
Green River and Roegner Park on the White River. Public access and future park development
along the rivers continue to be priorities of the City. A summary of potential projects utilizing
naturally occurring drainage ways include:
Roegner Park which connects to Game Farm Wilderness Park by a trail that runs alongside the
river. Continuation of the trail from Roegner Park to 'A' Street and eventually to the Interurban
Trail is being considered.
A master site plan by King County, which is being utilized to develop a regional trail along the
Green River. Currently the Green River Trail extends from Cecil Moses Memorial Park in Tukwila
to North Green River Park in South Kent. The hope is that if the trail is extended to S. 277tn
Street that it can be extended through Auburn and beyond. Due to private property along the
River the section of trail through Auburn presents some challenges, but surface streets could be
used to bridge the expected gaps.
ORD.E Page 338 of 751
Mill Creek, which provides an opportunity for a system of recreational activities along its length,
from pedestrian trails or boardwalks to educational interpretive sites. Property acquisition, park
planning and programming of the Auburn Environmental Park as well as Mill Creek restoration
efforts should continue.This future site will include connections to the Interurban Trail and
environmental, educational, interpretive signage describing the fish, plants, wetlands, and bird
migration patterns.
Vegetation
Historically, 80%a of the trees in this region were Douglas fir, with western red cedar, black
cottonwood, western hemlock and Sitka spruce present in smaller amounts. This naturally
occurring vegetation in Auburn was largely replaced as land came into use for farming, housing,
commerce and industry. Exceptions are the wooded hillsides, and the wooded corridors along
the Green and White Rivers. Many of these locations were cut for timber years ago and now
are second and third growth woodlands.
In the valley's more developed portions of the city and in the city parks, ornamental and
introduced species predominate. Wetlands in the west part of the valley vary in composition
from tree/shrub combinations of willow, dogwood, blackberries and black cottonwood to non-
tidal marshes consisting primarily of grasses and rushes. Vegetation along the larger rivers
consists primarily of black cottonwood with an occasional red alder and several varieties of
deciduous tree species.
Significance of Vegetation for the Park Plan:
All of these natural elements provide unique educational and recreational opportunities. They
are also different visually, and each provides visitors with a different experience. Possible ways
to incorporate vegetation into the educational and recreational experience include:
• Install signage about the natural history of Auburn and the Puget Sound in several park
locations throughout the city, each providing its own distinctive environment.
• While existing and proposed parks already encompass the river environment, explore
the wetlands and forested hills as two other natural environments that could be used
for possible park sites.
• Reintroduce native species, particularly in less urban parks. Not only are these varieties
generally low maintenance and disease resistant, they also provide valuable wildlife
food and habitat.
History
From its beginnings, Auburn was a crossroads. Tribal groups such as the Skopamish,
Smalhkamish, and Stkamish lived along the intersecting rivers. They forged trails over the
�
ORD.E Page 339 of 751 I
Cascade Mountains,traded with tribes living east of the mountains, and canoed down river to
gather shellfish and trade with coastal tribes.
In the mid-1800s, the first pioneers arrived in the White River Valley. Railroads reached
the area in the 1880s and brought adventurers from the east and Midwest United States, as
well as Europe and Asia. Early farmers, and many immigrants, from both Europe and Japan,
tilled the rich soil and planted a variety of crops.The harvests were abundant and soon the
White River Valley became one of the prime agricultural centers in the region.
Auburn's central location between Seattle and Tacoma was a key factor in the rapid growth of
the area. A powerhouse, built in 1911 on the upper White River, served Auburn as well as the
needs of the cities of Seattle and Tacoma. This facility also served the legendary Interurban
Railway. In 1910 the Northern Pacific Railroad selected the town as the site of its western
freight terminal. When scores of permanent rail workers arrived and needed housing, Auburn
experienced its first population boom.
World War II saw the second transformation of Auburn. The most dramatic change, however,
affected the local Japanese American community. When the federal government relocated the
residents of Japanese ancestry to distant internment camps for the duration of the war, many
families lost businesses, homes and farms. Most of these families never returned.
Although Auburn remained a strong agricultural community for some time, the city became
even more industrialized in the years following the War. The Boeing Company opened an
aircraft plant in Auburn in the 1960s. The occasional winter and spring flooding that wreaked
havoc for the early pioneers was brought under control when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
built the Mud Mountain and Howard Hanson Dams. The metamorphosis of a small frontier
settlement into a well-developed industrial center is a story that continues to evolve.
Significance of Auburn History for the Park Plan:
Unfortunately,this rich history is not known to many residents. Recreational sites can be a key
tool in introducing residents to local history. The following ideas would contribute to furthering
local historical knowledge and appreciation:
• Use park design, artwork, interpretive material and recreation programs to highlight
past events and lifestyles to help bring history to life.
• The acquisition and interpretation of historically significant sites should be explored.
Olson Canyon is a desirable site for this kind of use.
• The White River Valley Museum provides a valuable educational, cultural and
recreational resource.The continued marketing and educational programs of the
museum and their efforts to increase numbers of visitors will further enhance its value
to the community.
ORD.E Page 340 of 751
Recommendations/Conclusions
in Response to Our Auburn Community
Data concerning our population, natural resources, and history give us valuable information
about how to best serve our communities park and recreation needs.The following conclusions
can be drawn from the data provided above:
1. Age/Composition: Our young, growing population, with many single-parent families
and an increasing population of elderly residents, has extensive needs for recreation
and service programs, as well as recreation facilities.
2. Race: Auburn's changing racial composition can be incorporated into its historical,
cultural and recreational programming and in development of facilities.
3. Housing: With increased density of housing,there is an increased need for parks and
open space to replace the lost "backyard" is occurring.
4. Income Levels: The lower income levels in Auburn mean that there is a greater need
for public recreation facilities. Our residents also require classes and programs at
reasonable rates or no cost. Teens,the elderly and families with several children are
particularly in need of free or reduced fee services.
5. New Park Development: Specific park land and facilities needed to serve new
residents should be determined as development occurs or is planned. The recently
annexed areas of Lea Hill and West Hill are under served by parks and recreation
programs. Park site selection should ensure that the site will physically
accommodate the identified facilities. Areas with extensive steep slopes and
wetlands may be difficult areas in which to develop active recreation facilities,
although they may be suited to open space or passive activities.
6. Scenic and Resource Lands: Lands with high scenic or natural resource value should
be acquired and utilized for parks and open space. Public access to these locations
should be guaranteed through site selection and design.
7. Ecosystems: It is desirable to have parks located in a variety of ecosystems present
in the city. This means we plan parks in, or adjacent to the rivers, creeks, wetlands
and wooded hillsides found throughout the city. '
8. Art and History: The inclusion of historical artwork, public art, and information in
the development of parks will broaden their value to the community. It can provide
an added source of enjoyment and education to the recreational experience.
�
ORD.E Page 341 of 751
ORD.E Page 342 of 751
�
�
�
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 343 of 751
Chapter 3
Public Involvement
Parks are intended to serve the residents, workers and visitors of the city, it is vital their input
be sought in the planning process. This ensures implemented facilities and programs will be
used. Data gathered in the planning process can be used as a foundation for future actions,
eliminating the likelihood of arbitrary decisions. This section will detail how public input was
obtained, and how it influences the decision-making process. This chapter is divided into four
sections:
I. Recreation Needs Assessment
II. Park Land Needs
III. Facility Needs
IV. Summary
Section I, the Recreation Needs Assessment, describes the procedure used in determining what
recreational opportunities our community needs. Its analysis of recreation participation rates
and the preferred recreation activities of residents.
Section II, Park Land Needs, analyzes the quantity of park land needed to meet the needs of the
present and future population.
Section III, Facility Needs, describes the type of facilities most desired by Auburn residents, and
the number of facilities required to meet this demand. "Facilities" refers to physical features
such as a basketball courts or sports fields.
Finally, Section IV provides a Summary of Park Land Needs.
Public Participation
Several methods were used to assure public guidance, participation and awareness of the park
planning process in the Park and Recreation Plan. They include:
• On-line Survey
• Public, Park Board, Planning Commission and City Council Meetings
• Auburn Health Impact Assessment
• City of Auburn Community Visioning Report
The purpose of these activities was to determine community attitudes, use of existing facilities,
and the demand for additional recreational facilities and programs.
Recreation Standards
ORD.E Page 344 of 751
Recreation standards are guides that communities follow to estimate in quantifiable terms the
number of acres or facilities required to meet the recreation demand in the area. By attaching
the standard to a population variable, it is easy to forecast future needs as the population
grows. National standards, developed by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA),
are very general guidelines. Auburn, like most cities, develop recreation standards specific to
our community. Standards express minimum acceptable level of recreation facilities and park
land. Meeting or exceeding the standards is our goal of the planning process for future park
acquisition and development.
I. Recreation Needs Assessment
In March and April 2015 the City of Auburn Parks Department conducted an online Parks,
Recreation, and Open Space Survey. The purpose of this work was to identify the demand for
recreation programs and facilities in Auburn.
The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey produced by the Auburn Parks Department:
1. A survey of Auburn residents
2. Analysis of survey results compared to National Benchmarks to gain further strategic
information
3. Analysis of existing park land needs and forecasting future needs by the community and
Parks and Recreation department staff
4. Analysis of existing recreation facilities and forecasting of future needs, created by the Parks
and Recreation department and outcomes of Community Attitude and Interest
For study purposes an estimated 2014 population of 76,347 was used as a base for current
needs.The 2025 population is forecasted at approximately 84,948 and the 2030 population at
89,868. These figures are used in the study to calculate how much park land and what facilities
will be needed in the future.
Although this Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan Update does not look at the city's ultimate
development, it is good to keep in mind the impact that population growth will have on
recreational resources. Providing sufficient park land is an obvious concern for the long term, as
vacant land continues to be converted to commercial, residential, and industrial uses.
National Trends in Recreation Participation
The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) encourages Parks Departments to be
aware of trends facing parks and recreation. The NRPA has recently identified the following five
trends that will impact the future of parks and recreation:
Trend 1: Programs are key to great park attendance.
The public likes programs in parks. When there are programs in parks attendance is stronger.
When you don't have programs in parks it can lead to a slew of consequences— less use, less
public support, reduced budgets and more. One caution—watch out for those mandates on
cost recovery and the unintended social inequity that could be a result.
�
ORD.E Page 345 of 751
Trend 2:The perceived value of distributed services results in agency functions assigned to
various departments.
The recession resulted in a lot of restructuring of departments and shifting roles. One thing is
for certain, when a single department carries out all the park and recreation responsibilities,
operations are most effective. If your agency can position itself as a valuable essential service
and optimize your services, you'll fare best.
Trend 3: Agencies are pioneering new funding methods.
We have to remember that the "new normal" of shrinking municipal budgets doesn't
necessarily mean there is less public support or demand. Getting creative to maximize this
demand and bolster your revenue can be critical. In fact, during the recession those agencies
and special districts that invested in revenue-producing facilities fared better than others. Keep
in mind that you'll want to retain revenues for agency operations for success. The Analysis
report has a few examples.
Trend 4: Infrastructure deficit means you'll have to fight harder for public dollars.
The nation's infrastructure of state roads, highways, bridges, dams, sewers and more are well
over-due for replacement, renovation or renewal. Funding for these projects will compete with
yours. But you can address this— be at the infrastructure table to discuss park needs and how
you provide innovative solutions to the infrastructure challenge.
Trend 5: Walkable cities draw Millennials,fueling a suburban exodus.
The Millennials are here and have moved into the center of influence with their distinct views
and behaviors. Research shows they are drawn to walkable environments with cultural
amenities. Not only do you have to think about how you can serve their interests and harness
their influential power, but we have to consider the shifts that are happening in our urban
cores. Will disadvantaged populations be pushed into the suburbs? What does that mean for
the services we provide?
The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Survey Results
The survey specific questions were tailored to issues of strategic importance for park planning
and development and national benchmarking comparisons to Auburn. The survey was
developed to elicit information concerning:
• Level of use of park facilities
• Overall satisfaction of park facilities
• Percentage of respondents households that have a need for various recreational
facilities
• How well existing recreational facilities in Auburn meet the needs of respondent
households.
• Rates of participation in specific types of activities and programs
ORD.E Page 346 of 751
� • Satisfaction of current programming levels
• Satisfaction of the current Parks Administration
Overview of the Methodology
The City of Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department conducted an online Parks,
Recreation, and Open Space survey during March and April 2015 to help establish priorities for
the continued development of parks and recreation facilities, programs and services within the
community. Parks staff marketed the survey through social media (Facebook), newspaper
articles (Auburn Reporter), and through the City's Website. We received a total of 600
respondents for the online survey.
Summary of Survey Results
Q1. How often do members of your household visit any of the parks,trails, or other park
facilities in Auburn?
Q2. Which facilities do you or members of your household use the most to participate in
recreational activities?
Q3. Please rate your satisfaction with the following park facilities that you have used and/or
visited in the last year?
_ Q4. In general how would you rate the quality and quantity of the existing inventory of parks,
trails, and open spaces in Auburn?
Q5. Please rate the level of importance for each type of facility?
Q6. How often do you or members of your household participate in a Parks,Arts or
Recreation Program in Auburn?
Q7. How do you rate the quality of the programs that you have participated in?
Q8. How did you learn about the City of Auburn programs?
Q9. Please rate your satisfaction with various Parks,Arts& Recreation Programs currently
offered by the City of Auburn.
Q10. Please rate your level of participation in the following programs and activities that you
or members of your household participate in (does not matter where activity takes place)?
Q11. What recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others) that
your household members would use?
ORD.E Page 347 of 751
Q12. What recreation programs by age group should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by
others)that your household members would use?
Q13. Please rate the importance of the following functions that Auburn Parks and Rec
Department provide.
Q14. If it requires more money than can be budgeted from recreational resources to provide
future recreation programs, how would you rate the following methods of paying for them?
Q15. City Council, subject to voter approval and in conformity with statutory authority, can
propose a special property tax levy or bond issue as a means of financing parks, recreation
and open space acquisitions,development or improvements. How much, if anything, would
your household be willing to pay per year for this source of funding that could only be used
for parks and recreation?
Q16. Which area of the city do you live in?
Q17. How close do you live to the nearest park?
Q18. Where do you work?
Q19. How many years have you lived in Auburn?
Q20.What type of housing do you live in?
Q21. What age group are you in?
Q22.What is your race? (mark one or more)
II. Park Land Needs
The determination of park land needs begins with an inventory of existing parks. There are
currently 59 park sites owned and/or operated and maintained by the City of Auburn, totaling
977.37 acres. Table 3-1 below is an inventory of existing park land, by type. The park types are a
classification system used to group parks of similar size and function. Beyond the City limits
there are additional park and open space sites managed by King County.These may be
important considerations in the future if these areas of unincorporated King County are
annexed into the City.
ORD.E Page 348 of 751
Table 3-1
Existing Park Inventory
Park Type No. of Sites Acres/Miles No. Developed Acres/Miles Developed
Neighborhood Park 22 67.84 Acres 21 58.74 Acres
Community Parks 14 267.81 Acres 12 223.78 Acres
Open Space 7 386.89 Acres 0 0 Acres
Special Use Areas 16 254.77 Acres 16 254.77 Acres
Trails 15* 26.39 Miles** 15* 26.39 Mlles**
Totals 59 977.37 Acres 49 537.29 Acres
*Not included in No.of sites
**Not included totals
Neighborhood Park Inventory and Needs Analysis
Table 3-2
Neighborhood Parks
Size:Less than 5 acres
Service Area:%:mile radius
Typical Features:
Children's Play Structure
Picnic Facilities
Trails
Open Space/Nature Areas
Tennis Courts
Outdoor Basketball Court
Multi-use play fields
Definition
Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed primarily for non-
supervised, non-organized recreation activities. Neighborhood parks are usually small in size
(less than five acres) and serve an area of approximately 1/2 mile radius. Since these parks are
located within walking and bicycling distance,the activities they offer become a daily pastime
for neighborhood children.Typical facilities are listed in the side-bar.
Existing Inventory
ORD.E Page 349 of 751
Currently there are 22 neighborhood parks category, one of which is undeveloped. Most
neighborhood parks are fully developed. See Chapter 5 for a comprehensive list of
neighborhood parks.
Determination of the
Neighborhood/Mini-Park Standard
1.Adopted standard:
Auburn's has an adopted ratio of 1.32 total acres/1,000 is within this standard, which is based
on the current Park Impact Fee Study. The ratio of developed neighborhood parks is 1.32
acres/1000.
2. Service area:
Most residential areas of the City are served by neighborhood parks. Exceptions are the
portions of West Hill, portions of Lea Hill, the central downtown area, portions of southeast
Auburn, and undeveloped residential zones.
3. Present city policy:
In recent years the City has developed larger sized neighborhood parks over one to two acres.
Parks of more than five acres are easier to maintain and can serve a wider range of ages and
interests. Current City standard for neighborhood parks is 1.32 acres per 1,000 residents.
4. User trends:
Users of small neighborhood parks tend to be children. As neighborhoods grow older and
children mature, these parks tend to get less use. Users of the larger neighborhood park tend to
be older children and adults who visit it on a non-structured basis like hiking and jogging. These
parks have open space and visual value for the neighborhood. In recent years some smaller
parks have incorporated walking trails around the perimeter.
Table 3-3
Recommended Neighborhood Park Standard
Adopted Standard:
1.32 Acres/1,000
Existing Ratio:
Total: 1.01 Acres/1,000
Developed:0.89 Acres/1,000
Undevel:0.12 Acres/1,000
Existing Inventory:
67.84 Acres
Current Need:
32.94 Acres
Future Need:
2025:44.29 Acres
2030:50.79 Acres
Neighborhood Park
ORD.E Page 350 of 751
Conclusions/Recommendations:
1.Adopted Standard:
The adopted standard for neighborhood parks is 1.32 acres per 1,000 residents. Neighborhood
parks should be developed in response to new residential growth.
2. Current and Future Need:
The City falls short of its adopted standard for Neighborhood Parks by 32.94 Acres.
Approximately 44.29 acres of additional neighborhood park land will be needed by 2025. This
number will rise to 50.79 acres by 2030.
3. Future Neighborhood Park Development:
The City will need to assess current adopted standard using a community based approach to
determine if additional neighborhood park space is necessary to meet demand. In some cases
community parks or other facilities may take the place of neighborhood parks.
4. Park Development:
The development of more mini-parks (under one or two acres) is not encouraged. Mini-parks
have not been found to be as successful as larger community parks, because they tend to serve
very small populations and are difficult and expensive to maintain. Developers may have the
opportunity to develop neighborhood parks that are maintained by the local homeowners
association but meet the park standards.
Community Park Inventory and Needs Analysis
Table 3-4
Community Parks
Size: 10+acres*
Service Area: 1-2 mile radius
Typical Features:
Children's Play Structure
Picnic Facilities
Sport Fields
Nature Trails
Tennis Courts
Bodies of Water
Gardens
Parking
Restrooms
*Size exceptions occur for single purpose parks serving the entire community.
Definition
A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation
opportunities for young people and adults. They often exceed 10 acres in size and may have
sports fields, water bodies, gardens, nature trails or similar features as the central focus of the
ORD.E Page 351 of 751
park. Community parks can also provide indoor facilities to meet a wide range of recreation
interests.They require more support facilities such as parking and restrooms than
neighborhood parks. Community parks serve a much larger area than neighborhood parks and
offer more facilities. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can also
serve the neighborhood park function. The community park service area covers a one to two
mile radius.
Existing Inventory
Currently there are 12 community parks that are developed in Auburn, that comprise 223.78
total acres.Jacobsen Tree Farm and the 304 Ave SE property along the Green River are the two
community park sites that are currently undeveloped. These two sites account for 44 acres of
area that will be developed into Community Parks in the future. See Chapter 5 for a
comprehensive list of Community Parks.
Determination of the Community Park Standard
1.Adopted standards:
The adopted standard for community parks is 4.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Auburn's current
ratio of 2.92 acres/1,000 of developed community park area falls short of the adopted standard
by 119 acres. There is currently 44 acres (0.57 acres/1000) of undeveloped community park
land in the City's park land inventory.
2. Service Area:
The valley floor portion of Auburn is served by community parks reasonably well. The recently
annexed areas of the City (West Hill and Lea Hill), and southeast auburn need to be considered
for adding park area.
3. Present city policy:
In recent years the City placed emphasis on developing the larger community parks. They have
more recreation choices, are cheaper to maintain on a per acre basis, serve more people and
are easier to program for activities.
4. User Trends:
The larger multi-service community parks are popular because they provide a wide range of
activities. Community parks can often meet the recreation needs of all members of the family in
one location.
Table 3-5
Recommended Community Park Standard
Adopted Standard:
4.5 Acres/1,000
Existing Ratio:
Total:3.50 Acres/1,000
Developed:2.92 Acres/1,000
ORD.E Page 352 of 751
Undevel:0.57 Acres/1,000
Existing Inventory:
Developed: 223.78 Acres
Undevel:44.03 acres
Current Need:
119 Acres
Future Need:
2025: 158.48 Acres
2030: 180.63 Acres
Community Park
Conclusions/Recommendations
1.Adopted Standard:
Maintaining the standard of 4.5 acres of developed community park land per 1,000 population
is recommended.This reflects both the relative importance Auburn residents place on this type
of multi-use facility, which has remained relatively constant over the past two decades.
2. Current and Future Need:
At 2.92 acres/1000 residents, the City is currently is currently falling short of adopted standards
for total community park land by 119 acres. If residential development proceeds as expected,
by 2025 158.58 acres additional acreage is needed, with 180.63 acres of additional area needed
by 2030.
3. Future Community Park Development:
Future community park sites should be selected to west hill and lea hill, newly developing
areas, and to help fill large gaps between existing parks. Other residential areas, while within
the two mile radius, are toward the edge of existing service areas. These areas include the
northeast and southeast corners of the City. With population growth occurring in these areas,
new community park acquisition and development is necessary.
Trails Inventory and Needs Assessment
Table 3-6
Trails/Linear Parks
Size:Wide Variation
Service Area: Local to
Regional
Typical Features:
Trails
Trailheads
Nature Trails
Picnic Facilities
Interpretive Signage
Benches
RiverAccess
ORD.E Page 353 of 751 �'�
Definition
Trails/Linear parks usualiy follow elongated features such as stream corridors, abandoned
railroads, or power line easements. These parks may be used for trail systems, interpretive
areas, open space or landscaped areas.Trail/Linear parks often contain limited development;
trail heads, trail systems, educational signage and benches or picnic tables may be all that
occur. However, in cases such as a wide power line easement, more extensive development is
possible.
Existing Inventory
In Auburn, the Interurban Trail, the Reddington Levee (Green River) Trail, and the White River
Trail fall into the trail park category. The Interurban Trail is a 4.5 mile path along the Puget
Sound Energy right-of-way. The trail travels from north to south through the city and is part of a
larger regional system that runs from Tukwila to Pacific. Development consists of a paved trail
used for walking, running, biking and skating. The White River Trail (WRT) extends through
Roegner Park and Game Farm Wilderness Park where the entire length of the trail runs along
the river. The length of the WRT is included in this category, but the acreage for Roegner Park
and Game Farm Wilderness Park are included in the area calculations for Community and
Special Use areas, respectively. In addition to a paved trail, the WRT has a soft surface trail that
is suitable for equestrians or hikers for part of its length.
Table 3-7
Adopted Trail Standard
Adopted Standard:
0.19 mile/1,000
Existing Ratio:
Total:0.34 mile/1,000
Existing Inventory:
26.39 Miles
Current Need:
0.0 Miles
Future Need:
2025:0 Miles*
2030:0 Miles*
*Additional miles will be added based on residential development and the transportation plan.
Determination of the Standard
1. Comparison to other standards:
Auburn's adopted ratio of 0.19 total miles/1,000 developed trail park land is near the top when
compared to other cities.
2.Service area:
ORD.E Page 354 of 751
Depending on the facilities, trails may serve a local neighborhood, or in the case of the
Interurban Trail, serve the entire community and beyond.There are additional opportunities in
Auburn to develop this type of park area.
3. User Trends:
Based on the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey, walking and other trail related activities
continue to be the most popular form of recreational activity in Auburn. The vision to build
regional trail systems connecting communities presents some challenges but is still attainable in
southern King County.
Trails/Linear Parks
Conclusions/Recommendations:
1. Recommended Standard:
Because unique opportunities exist, and interest in trails is high, the standard for trails is
recommended to stay at the current ratio of 0.19 miles developed trail park land/1000
residents. Even with the current inventory of trails exceeding adopted standards, further
expansion and development of trails is imperative to connect the different areas of the City and
beyond. The need for an interconnected trail system is expected to increase as residents show
an overwhelming interest in using trails to recreate, and when considering alternative means of
commuting to and from work.
2. Future Trails/Linear Park Development:
There are several opportunities to develop additional trails and linear parks in Auburn providing
local and regional trail systems. Considering the interest in trail activities as demonstrated by
the survey and national recreation trends, these additional trails are worth pursuing. Identified
locations for potential loop trails within parks, new linear parks, or extensions of existing linear
parks include:
• BPA Power Line Easement (Lea Hill to Green River Road)
• Green River
• White River Trail (A Street to Interurban Trail)
• Mill Creek Corridor
• Rotary Park
• Shaughnessy Park
• Fulmer Park
Special Use Area Inventory and Needs Assessment
Table 3-8
Special Use Areas
Size:Variable
Service Area:Not
applicable
TypicalFeatures:
ORD.E Page 355 of 751
Landscaped Areas
Community Gardens
Viewpoints
Historic Sites
Traffic Islands
Specific Park or Recreation
Areas
Table 3-9
Adopted
Special Use Area
Standard
Recommended Standard:
None
Existing Inventory:
254.77 Acres
Current Need:
0.0 Acres
Future Need:
2025:0 Acres**
2030:0 Acres**
**Based on availability
Definition
Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or land occupied by a specialized
facility. Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small landscaped areas,
community gardens, streetscapes, developed portions of the Environmental Park, viewpoints,
historic sites and other specialized areas.
Existing Inventory
The farmstead portion of Mary Olson Farm, and the bird tower and boardwalk area of the
Environmental Park have been added to this category since the last Park Plan update. Other
special use areas in Auburn include unique sites such as the Auburn Golf Course, Fenster Nature
Park, Mountainview Cemetery, and Pioneer Cemetery. These areas in the City total 254.77
acres.
In addition to the areas mentioned above and not included in the overall acreage of our park
inventory,the Parks and Recreation Department maintains trees and landscaping at more than
30 beautification areas throughout the City. Most of these beautification areas provide valuable
green space along streets, but are not intended for recreation purposes.The horticultural
maintenance crew also tends to all of the hanging baskets and planters downtown and at
several sites throughout Auburn.
Special Use Areas
Conclusions/Recommendations
1. No Standard Recommended:
ORD.E Page 356 of 751
No standard for development of special use areas is recommended. It is expected that
additional acreage will continue to be acquired as development occurs, and as small areas
unusable for other purposes become part of the public right-of way.
2.Aesthetic Improvements:
Survey comments reveal that residents have a strong interest in the aesthetic improvement of
the City through additional plantings of street trees, flowers and other plantings.These special
use and beautification areas are good opportunities for incorporating aesthetic improvements
into the community.
3. Design Guidelines:
The Parks and Recreation Department has a goal to develop design guidelines for special use
areas. These should address the different types of special use areas and their particular design
and maintenance requirements. Low maintenance plantings are recommended.
4. Public Green Spaces:
Opportunities for incorporating additional green space into public settings should be explored.
The following activities should be undertaken to achieve this goal:
• Work with the Traffic Engineering Department to ensure parking strip and landscaping
standards are sufficient to meet the cultural needs of street trees and other
landscaping.
• Encourage development of boulevard style streets in significant locations.
• Develop a street tree program. Inventory trees and plants in existing public rights-of-
way, and prepare a long-term care and replacement plan. Maintain Tree City USA
designation.
5. Historic Properties:
Identification of historic sites and buildings, and potential methods for their preservation
should be undertaken through development of a Historic Preservation Plan. Both existing and
potential park sites should be examined for their ability to contain or interpret
historic sites, buildings, and events. See Chapter 6 for more on historic preservation. Continue
to work with King County Cultural Resources Division to identify sites and funding opportunities
for historic properties.
TOTAL PARK LAND NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Definition and Inventory:
Auburn's total park land inventory equals 977.37 acres. This complete inventory includes all the
park types discussed earlier in this chapter: Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Linear
Parks, Open Space, and Special Use Areas. The ratio of total park area for all park, including all
park areas is 12.8 acres/1,000 residents.
ORD.E Page 357 of 751
For the purposes of assessing the amount of park land needed for the future, our plan focuses
on the Neighborhood, Community and Linear Trail Parks. These will be referred to as the "Core
Parks" in Auburn's park system. The total developed park area, including community and
neighborhood parks encompasses 282.52 acres.The overall area, including undeveloped
community and neighborhood park areas encompasses 335.65 acres.
It is still desirable to continue adding space to the Open Space and Special Use Areas, but these
lands are often acquired incidentally, and will not be pursued through developer impact fees.
Basis for the Standard:
Auburn's Total Park Land Standard is based on the core parks. In most cases existing parks are
well-developed and can be considered complete. Several parks, however, contain open areas
that can absorb additional recreational facilities or development.These parks were analyzed to
determine the amount of fully developed acreage they contain.This "developed" park area is
used in determining the recommended standard.
Table 3-12 lists the existing ratios for parks, showing these for both the total acres for each park
type,then the existing ratios for just the developed acreage. In fairness toward those who may
pay impact fees in the future, the Recommended Standard is based on the ratio for only
developed park areas for the Core Parks. This plan assumes that future park land will be fully
developed in order to meet the recommended standard.
Determination of the Standard:
The current standards are based on The Park Impact Fee Study prepared by the FCS Group,
dated. The current Auburn Municipal Code (AMC), Chapter 19.08 codifies the impact fees and
requires impact fees to be paid at the time of issuance of a Building Permit. The adopted ,
which includes Linear Parks, is 6.03 acres per 1,000. The standard of 6.03 acres per 1,000
applies to all new residential developments, which is in place to mitigate impacts on the
community by paying impact fees.
Pursuant to ACC 17.14.100, it is the policy of the city to require park land dedication where a
proposed subdivision will result in a substantial increase in demand for park land or is needed
to prevent or abate public nuisances. Generally, this will occur where a subdivision will result in
the creation of lots capable of supporting 50 or more residential dwelling units; however,
where it is determined that the proposed subdivision, together with any reasonably anticipated
future development on adjacent or nearby land, will act in a cumulative manner to substantially
increase demand for park land, dedication may be required of smaller subdivisions.
Currently fee in lieu of land dedication is available, but is not required by code. Several large
scale developments have opted for fee in lieu of land dedication in the recent past, with the
fees being based on land values as they relate to the 6.03 acres/1,000 residents.
Based on the premise that larger community parks and multi-use facilities are more desirable
from a demand and needs standpoint,the City needs to consider updating the current code to
include a fee in lieu of land dedication program for developments that include 50 lots or more.
ORD.E Page 358 of 751
This will allow for allocating funds to develop and improve larger park properties in order to
meet the demands of a growing population. A new Park Impact Fee Study is for Planned 2016,
and will update the level of service standards based on the demand and needs analysis in this
plan. A system that takes into account the ratio of land per 1,000 residents, an overall system
dollar value per capita, and proximity of facilities to the population (service area) is
recommended. Many cities are doing this in lieu of exclusively relying on land to residents per
1,000 ratios because needs and improvements are better assessed through this community
based approach.
Total Park Land
Conclusions/Recommendations:
1. Recommended Standard:
The adopted standard of 6.03 acres per 1,000 population will ensure that Auburn residents will
continue to have access to the same level of Community, Neighborhood and Linear Park land as
the community continues to grow. As previously discussed this standard will be updated
through a Park Impact Fee study.
No standard is established for Open Space Areas or Special Use Areas, although the City will
continue to pursue acquisition of these types of park land as opportunities arise.These areas
may be looked at more closely when updating the Park Impact Fee Study, while taking into
account park land demands and needs presented in this plan.
2. Park Use by Non-Residents:
Park Department records show county residents participate frequently in Auburn recreation
programs. It can be assumed they also visit the City's parks with equal frequency. Non-resident
use does not show up in the survey data, since only City residents participated in the survey. In
addition to county residents, people who work here and visit from other areas also benefit from
the parks and recreation system. This group is known as equivalent population and should be
taken into account when determining demands and needs, and level of service standards
provided by the City's Park system.
The fee to participate in Auburn's programs and classes is discounted to Auburn residents,
while non-residents pay full price. This fee system does not compensate the City for the actual
cost of providing these services or facilities.The City also receives some funding from sources
outside the City, including King County.
3. Potential Annexation Areas
Over the course of the past decade or more, significant areas in the west hill and lea hill
portions of the City have been annexed. There are several smaller scale areas planned for
annexation, but should not affect demands and needs over the service area that the City
currently encompasses. This will make it easier to plan for expanding the parks inventory to
meet the demands and needs of future populations.
ORD.E Page 359 of 751
III. Facility Needs
Establishing needs for specialized facilities such as sport fields, trail systems, swimming pools,
and gymnasium space was determined by using several analytical approaches.These included:
• Present recreation participation levels and needs as expressed in the survey ( City of
Auburn Parks Department March 2015)
• NRPA trends
• Input from staff concerning user groups
• Number and type of sport teams
• Play requirements
• Mathematical models
Information derived from the survey and input from user groups via City staff was taken into
account when goals were developed for specific types of recreation facilities. Also considered
were existing school district, County and private facilities located within the City of Auburn.
These other facilities satisfy a certain need, but they do not completely make up for the
shortfall of public need.
The following pages provide a short description and analysis of each major type of recreational
facility.These include:
• Baseball Fields
• Softball and Youth Baseball Fields
• Football Fields
• Soccer Fields
• Tennis Courts
• Gymnasium Space
• Community Center
• Swimming Pools
• Recreation Trails
Baseball Fields
Table 3-10
Adopted
Baseball Field Goal:
Adopted Goal:
1 Field/6,000 residents
Existing Ratio:
1 Field/5873 residents
Existing Inventory:
13 Fields
Unmet Need:
ORD.E Page 360 of 751
0 Fields
Existing Baseball Field Inventory:
City Fields
Brannan Park 2 Field, Lighted
Game Farm Park 1 Field, Lighted
School Fields
Auburn High 1 Field; Lighted
Auburn Riverside High School 1 Field; Lighted
Auburn Mountainview High School 2 Field; 1 Lighted
Cascade Middle School 1 Field
Mt. Baker Middle School 3 Fields
Olympic Middle School 1 Field
Rainier Middle School 1 Field
Tota I 13
Analysis:
Baseball fields in Auburn parks are suitable for adults and youth ages 13 and over. At present
most baseball teams are for are the primary users of baseball fields in the City. The City, Auburn
Little League and select baseball leagues administer Youth baseball programs.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Survey:
The survey indicated that youth baseball ranked #16 in participation and adult baseball
ranked 38 in Auburn.
2. User Trends:
Youth baseball participation has decreased in the past two decades.
3. Field Demand:
Demand for baseball fields is currently created by 8 teams.
These include:
2 City Sponsored Youth Baseball Teams, age 13+
0 Auburn Little League, age 13+
4 Select teams
8 Total Teams
Conclusions/Recommendations:
The current number of fields are currently adequate, but will need to be reassessed during the
next Park Plan update in order to determine if needs are met in the future. A priority system
ORD.E Page 361 of 751
has also been established that ensures that Auburn residents have the highest priority for field
use.
Softball and Youth Baseball Fields
Table 3-11
Recommended
Softball and Youth
Baseball Field Goal:
Adopted Goal:
1 Field/2,200 residents
Existing Ratio:
1 Field/3,319 residents
Existing Inventory:
23 Fields
Unmet Need:
11 Fields
Existing Softball/Youth Baseball Field Inventory:
City Fields
Brannan Park 1 Fields (1 Lighted)
Fulmer Field 2 Fields (2 Lighted)
Game Farm Park 3 Fields (2 Lighted)
GSA Park 2 Fields (2 Lighted)
Les Gove Park 1 Fields
Scootie Brown Park 1 Field
Sunset Park 2 Fields
School Fields
West Auburn High 1 Field
Auburn Riverside High School 2 Fields (1 Lighted)
Auburn Mountainview High 2 Fields
Mt. Baker Middle School 2 Fields
Olympic Middle School 1 Field
Rainier Middle School 1 Field
Community Fields
YMCA 2 Field
Tota I 23
Analysis:
ORD.E Page 362 of 751
The demand for softball and youth baseball fields has declined but remains strong, with over
161 teams currently using City fields. In Auburn, the City manages adult softball, youth softball,
youth baseball and T-Ball programs. In addition, school teams, local Little League, and select
fast pitch teams use City fields. In Auburn, adult and youth softball, youth baseball and
sometimes even soccer are played on the same fields. When these leagues play at the same
time it makes scheduling very difficult and requires more field space.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Survey:
The survey shows that youth baseball was ranked #16, youth softball was ranked #26, and
adult softball was ranked #32 in participation.
2. User Trends:
Interest in youth baseball has decreased in the past two decades; interest in softball has
remained nearly constant.
3. Field Demand:
Demand for softball and youth baseball fields is created by the following number of teams:
80 City Adult Slow Pitch
9 City Youth Baseball (grades 3-6)
7 City Youth Fastpitch
18 City T-Ball/Cub Clinic
40 Little League
161 Total Teams
The City is able to provide enough fields only by restricting practice time once the season
begins. Teams practice before the season, on weekends or use elementary school facilities.
Demand for practice time exceeds the availability at school fields. The heavy demand for
organized play and practice allows little opportunity for informal play at most of these fields.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
To meet the adopted standard of 1 field/2200 residents the City will need to consider
developing or gaining access to 11 additional fields. The current number of fields does not
meet current or future needs, but with participation rates declining this number is likely not as
bad as it looks.
Football Fields
Existing Football Field Inventory:
Table 3-12
Adopted
Football Field Goal:
Recommended Goal:
1 Field/4,000 residents
ORD.E Page 363 of 751
Existing Ratio:
1 Field/6,940 residents
Existing Inventory:
11 Fields
Unmet Need:
8 Fields
City Fields
Game Farm 4 Seasonal Field (1 Lighted)
School Fields
Auburn High School 1 Field, Lighted, Synthetic
Auburn Riverside High 1 Field, Lighted, Synthetic
Auburn Mountainview High 1 Field, Lighted Synthetic
Cascade Middle School 1 Field
Olympic Middle School 1 Field
Mt. Baker Middle School 1 Field
Rainier Middle School 1 Field
Analysis:
Eleven football fields currently serve several football programs. The City-sponsored adult flag
football program has 41 teams that play on four seasonal fields at Game Farm. The Auburn
Junior Football Auburn Ravens Leagues are privately sponsored and have four age divisions
which play tackle football, with a total of 9 teams between them. Each of privately sponsored
youth football leagues have cheer programs, which share the spaces being used for football.
The Parks Department sponsors a youth flag football league which has seven teams. As the
existing inventory list shows, seven fields are on school property, so these fields are not
available during school events.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Survey:
Although survey rankings for football were not very high, this sport remains very popular for
certain age groups and individuals. Football ranked #25 in participation rates.
2. User Trends
The number of football teams playing in Auburn has remained constant for the past few
years.
3. Demand:
41 City Adult Flag Football
9 Auburn Junior Football League (4 age divisions)
7 City Youth Flag Football
57 Total Teams
Conclusions/Recommendations: The current need for these fields is for games and practice
time. The existing ratio reflects a deficiency in football fields. With deficiencies in football and
ORD.E Page 364 of 751
soccer fields, the City needs to consider adding to the inventory of fields used for football and
soccer.
Soccer Fields
Table 3-13
Recommended
Soccer Field Goal:
Recommended Goal:
1 Field/2,000 residents
Existing Ratio:
1 Field/7,634 residents
Existing Inventory:
36 Fields
Unmet Need:
2
Existing Soccer Field Inventory:
City Fields
Brannan Park 1 Field, Unlighted
Brannan Park 7 Modified
Game Farm Park 2 Fields, Lighted
Game Farm Park 7 Modified
School Fields
Auburn High 1 Field, Lighted
Auburn Riverside High 1 Field, Lighted
Auburn Mountain View High 1 Field, Lighted
West Auburn High 1 Field, Unlighted
Community Fields
YMCA 2 Fields, Unlighted
YMCA 13 Modified
Total 36*
*Includes a combination of full sized and modified fields
Analysis:
The total number of soccer fields includes 10 full sized soccer fields and 27 mini or modified
fields that are set up between Game Farm Park, Brannan Park, and the YMCA. Depending on
the size of the modified fields they can be used for youth or adult play. With the popularity of
ORD.E Page 365 of 751
soccer trending upwards, the City needs to consider how to increase the number of accessible
soccer fields in order to meet current and future demands.
The City has one existing Kompan mini soccer field at Lea Hill Park, with one planned and
funded through a King County Youth Sports Facility Grant at Brannan Park. These are small
arena style sports courts with synthetic surfacing, and are extremely popular for open play.
There is no programming planned for these facilities.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Survey:
According to the survey, youth soccer was#12 in participation, while adult soccer ranked
#34. However, interest in.
2. User Trends:
Soccer has shown a steady increase in popularity nationally, and a dramatic increase in the
Northwest in the last 10 years.
3. Demand:
Currently, demand for soccer field use is created by the following number of teams:
66 City Youth Soccer
70 Auburn Youth Soccer Association
6 Adult Soccer Teams
142 Total Teams
Conclusions/Recommendations:
Analysis of the figures indicates a need for 28 additional fields at this time.
Tennis Courts
Table 3-14
Adopted
Tennis Courts Goal:
Recommended Goal:
1 Court/2,500 residents
Existing Ratio:
1 Court/2633 residents
Existing Inventory:
29 Tennis Courts
Unmet Need:
1 Courts
Existing Tennis Court Inventory
City Courts
Game Farm Park 4 Courts, Lighted
Lea Hill Tennis Courts 1 Court
ORD.E Page 366 of 751
School Courts
Auburn High School 8 Courts, Lighted
Auburn Riverside High 8 Courts, Lighted
Auburn Mountainview High 8 Courts, Lighted
Total 29
Analysis:
There are 29 tennis courts in Auburn located at school sites and city parks. There are no public
or private indoor tennis facilities in the Auburn area.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Comparison to Other Standards:
Auburn has a higher ratio than most other representative communities. This is accounted for
in part because school facilities are used in calculating the ratio.
2. Survey:
Survey results show that tennis was ranked #30 in participation.
3. User Trends
Although interest in tennis on a national scale has remained about the same for the past
twenty years, Auburn's participation remains relatively low.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
Because of Auburn's relatively low interest and participation rates, the current number of
tennis courts is sufficient. No additional courts are needed at this time.
Gymnasium Space
Existing Gymnasium Inventory:
Table 3-15
Adopted
Gymnasium Goal:
Recommended Goal:
1 Gym/5,000 residents
Existing Ratio:
1 Gym/15,269 residents
Existing Inventory:
5 Gyms *
Unmet Need:
10 Gyms
* Based on 15%usage of 27
Public School Gymnasiums.
ORD.E Page 367 of 751
City Facilities
Les Gove 1 Gym
Auburn Schools
Alpac Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Chinook Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Dick Scobee Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Evergreen Hts. Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Hazelwood Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Gildo Rey Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Ilalko Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Lakeland Hills Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Lakeview Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Lea Hill Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Pioneer Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Terminal Park Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Washington Elementary 1 Youth Gym
Cascade Middle School 1 Adult Gym
Mt. Baker Middle School 1 Adult Gyms
Olympic Middle School 1 Adult Gym
Rainier Middle School 1 Youth Gym
Auburn High School 2 Adult Gyms
Auburn Mountainview High 2 Adult Gyms
Auburn Riverside High School 2 Adult Gyms
West Auburn High 1 Adult Gym
Green River College 1 Adult Gym
Community and Private Gyms
Grace Community Church 1 Adult Gym
Total 29 Gyms
Analysis:
The City of Auburn offers volleyball, basketball, fitness, karate,judo, indoor soccer, indoor
playground, and gymnastics programs that utilize gymnasiums. Because the City has only one
gymnasium of its own, it borrows space from the Auburn School District. The primary limiting
factor in gym space is when school and park programs overlap. During the school year access to
the school gyms is unpredictable and they are usually not available until after 7 p.m. In
addition, several groups, such as the YMCA, scouts, churches and the City, compete for use of
school and City facilities, which makes scheduling more difficult.
Based on the information above, school district facilities are available only 15% of the time. This
figure is used in calculating the existing ratio and recommended standard. Analysis reveals the
ORD.E Page 368 of 751
use of school gymnasiums provides just enough space for the volleyball and basketball
programs. Cancellations of games are frequent, due to school programming. Free court time or
court use for other programs is limited. Since the construction of the City's Gymnasium at Les
Gove Community Center, day use by indoor playground users and senior groups has been
extremely popular.
Determination of Standard:
Since many different activities use gymnasiums, this standard affects many sports.
1. Survey:
The Survey indicates that access to gymnasiums for a broad range of sports and activities is
important to residents. Participation rates of City programming was also taken into
consideration for the demands and needs of Gymnasium facilities.
The seasons with the greatest demand occur from September through May. During this season
basketball and volleyball programs sponsored by the City, YMCA and the School District take
place simultaneously. At peak season the following number of teams play:
41 City Adult Basketball
8 City Youth Basketball
36 Community Based Youth Basketball
8 City Youth Volleyball
16 Auburn Youth Basketball
109 Total Teams
Additional Demand: A substantial number of other dance and fitness classes per week would
be offered if additional gymnasium space was available.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
Both the number of gymnasiums and the hours that are available point to a strong need for
additional gym space. For maximum scheduling availability and operating efficiency, it would be
beneficial to have additional facilities constructed, owned and operated by the City. The new
Community and Teen Center is expected to absorb some of the current needs of gymnasium
space areas available for fitness classes and other activities that do not require full sized
gymnasiums.
The City-owned gymnasium has added much needed daytime hours to the program schedule
and enabled the City to serve populations such as young children and seniors. Once completed,
the community center (which will include indoor fitness areas) will be a valuable resource for
Auburn residents choosing from a list of proposed recreational facilities.
Ultimately the City needs to reassess the adopted standard. There is no question that the
current number of gymnasiums is deficient, but it is not realistic to construct or expect to gain
access to 10 additional gymnasiums.
ORD.E Page 369 of 751
Swimming Pools
Table 3-16
Recommended
Swimming Pool Goal:
Recommended Goal:
159 sq.ft./1,000
residents
Existing Ratio:
155 Sq.Ft./1,000 residents
Existing Inventory:
7,000 Sq. Ft.YMCA
4,859 Sq. Ft.ASD Pool
Unmet Need:
None
Existing Swimming Pool Inventory:
Auburn School District 1 Indoor Pool
YMCA 2 Indoor Pool (Natatorium)
Analysis:
Auburn has a higher ratio of pool water than most cities analyzed. Swimming was ranked #9 in
participation.
Determination of the Goal:
1. Comparison to Other Cities:
Auburn has a higher ratio of pool water than most cities analyzed.
2. Survey:
Swimming was in the top ranked #9 in participation.
3. User Trends:
Swimming is usually one of the top recreation activities in a
Community.
4. Demand:
Community needs for aquatic facilities are currently being met through a combination of
School District and YMCA facilities.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
Based on the demand above, there is an excess of pool space currently available. The
recommended goal shows no additional indoor pool area is presently needed.The addition of
the new Auburn YMCA pools will cover the need of the community by way of park department
use of the facility on a regular basis.
ORD.E Page 370 of 751
IV. Summary of Park and Facility Need
Table 3-23 below summarizes the information described and analyzed in the previous pages.
The table includes:
• Adopted standards
• Inventory of existing park land
• Inventory of specialized recreation facilities
• Amount of land and facilities that will be required to meet needs in 2025 and 2030
Table 3-17 Summary of Park and Facility Needs
Park Types Adopted Existing Existing Current Future Future
Standard Inventory Inventory Unmet Need: 2025 Need: 2030
(In developed (Total (Dev'd Need (Est. Pop (Est. Pop
acres/1,000 res.) Acres) acres) 84,948) 89,868)
Neighborhood Parks 1.32 67.84 58.74 32.94 44.29 50.97
Community Parks 4.5 267.81 223.75 119 158.48 180.63
Open Space Areas As acquired 386.89 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Trails 0.21 26.39 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Miles
Subtotals 6.03 6.03
Special Use Areas As identified 254.77
Total Park Land 6.03 Acres/1,000 977.37 537.29 151.94 202.77 231.6
residents
Recreational Adopted Existing Existing Unmet Future Future
Facilities Standards Inventory Inventory Need Need Need
(Dev'd) (2025) (2030)
Baseball Fields 1 Field/6,000 13 N/A 0 1 2
Youth Fastpitch and 1 Field/2,200 23 N/A 11 16 18 I
baseball fields I
Football Fields 1 Field/4,000 11 N/A 8 10 11
Soccer Fields 1 Field/2,000 36 N/A 2 6 9
Tennis Courts 1 Field/2,500 29 N/A 1 5 7
Gymnasiums 1 Gym/5,000 5 N/A 10 12 13
SwimmingPools 159sf/1,000 155 N/A 0 1,674 sf 2,456 sf
PUBLIC ART INVENTORY
Existing Major Public Art Projects
Year Artist Piece Location
1989 Tom Teitge City Centennial Mural E Main & B St. NE
ORD.E Page 371 of 751
1989 Meg Pettibone Steelhead Isaac Evans Park
1991 Richard Beyer Chiidren Playing Train
at the Switch City Hall
1992 Brad Rude The Long Look Centennial Viewpoint
1993 Michele Van Slyke Every Year the Salmon Return Roegner Park
1994 Nancy Hammer Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge Auburn Way S& Hwy 18
1995 Garth Edwards B Street Plaza E Main & B St. SE
1996 Timothy Siciliano Bus Shelter Murla 15th St SW
1996 Gerald Tsutukawa Sun Circle Game Farm Park
1997 Timothy Siciliano The Equine Amusement 15th St. NE @ Metro P&R
1998 Deborah Merksy Pioneer Cemetery Entryway Auburn Way N &8th St. NE
1999 Kulzer&Spitzer Xtreme AtmosFearic Oscillator Auburn Skate Park
2000 Evans&Mee Mnemosyne's Opus King County Library
2000 Ries Niemi Sundial Les Gove Park
2001 Phillip Levine Threshold Les Gove Park
2001 Ries Niemi 5 Moments Senior Center Les Gove Park
2003 Paul Sorey Running Figures Sound Transit Plaza
2004 Brandon Zebold Sighting LL Hills Way& Evergreen Way
2004 Sidney Genette Blue Neutron Auburn Justice Center
2005 Ingrid Lahti Les Gove Community Campus Sign Auburn Way S& F Street
2006 Darel Grothaus Evergreen-Washelli Cemetery:
Seattle,WA Cemetery Admin Building
2007 Greg Boudreau Veteran's Day Parade Veteran's Memorial Building
2008 Tom Askman
Le Anne Lake Tobu Bo West Main Street
2008 Jesse Brown Urban Art Works Mural 233 W. Main Street
(A1 Collision Building)
2009 Susan Zoccola Swing and Flight Auburn Golf Course
2010 Rachael Dotson Auburn Ave Theater Mural 10 Auburn Ave
2011 Bruce Meyers Auburn Valley Topography Les Gove Park
2011 Sheila Klein Civic Lanterns 25 W. Main, City Hall
2011 Rachael Dotson Utility Boxes Varous—Throughout Downtown
2011 Mauricia Robalino Ride the Wave 116 A Street
2012 Chris Sharp Railroads our Beginning Mural 364 W Main Street
1013 Michael Laughlin Strawberry Calf Lea Hill Park
2013 Lin McJunkin Riparian Totem Auburn Justice Center
2013 Patricia Vader Watch My Tail 4910 A Street SE
2014 Kenneth Hall Origami#2—Fuchia Sunset Park
2015 Greg Bartol Silverware Ostrich A St NW and 15`St. NE
2016 Virginia Paquette Confluence/Community 9910 Ninth Street SE
ORD.E Page 372 of 751
ORD.E Page 373 of 751
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 374 of 751
Chapter 4
Goals and Objectives
The Mission Statement of the Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department is to "Protect the
City of Auburn's natural beauty through a vibrant system of parks, open space, and trails while
enhancing the quality of life for our citizens by providing outstanding recreational ad cultural
opportunities."
These goals and objectives outlined in this chapter were developed from the following
resources:
• 2005 Park, Arts and Recreation Open Space Plan
• 2015 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey
• Park and Recreation Board meetings
� Analysis of recreation trends
• Participation rates and interests
• Evaluation of existing park conditions.
• City of Auburn Health Impact Assessment
1. Serve all Cltlzens— Provide a broad range of programs and facilities in order to serve all
citizens regardless of age or ability.
The Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department strives to provide leisure/recreational
programs and facilities which are open and accessible to all citizens in the community. We are
aware of the special needs of some segments of our population, and continue to provide and
improve upon facilities and programs designed to accommodate these special needs.
A continuing issue for any recreational program or park system is to ensure that people are
aware that programs are available. With the evolution of social media over the last decade,the
City has had to adapt its marketing strategies to include both innovative and traditional ways to
engage the citizens of Auburn.
Objectives
• Provide a variety of recreation facilities and programs that will improve the physical and
mental wellbeing of community members.
• Provide a system of neighborhood and community parks so that residents live within a
half mile walking distance to a developed park.
• Develop multi-use facilities to increase flexibility to meet recreational trends as
demonstrated by community input.
• Continue to identify underserved segments of the population and develop programs
that will satisfy unmet needs.
ORD.E Page 375 of 751
• Develop marketing strategies allowing the widest possible distribution of information
concerning park facilities and recreation programs.
• Provide programs and facilities designed for maximum affordability to local residents.
• Continue to improve upon and expand the Fee Waiver and Scholarship Programs, where
possible, to allow more low income youth and seniors to participate at reduced rates.
• Continue to improve access for the disabled and seniors by providing wheelchair ramps
and other appropriate facilities in parks where they do not currently exist.
• Continue to maintain an open decision-making process that allows opportunity for
citizen input.
• Parks and Recreation Department staffing levels shall be sufficient to maintain and
improve the existing cultural and recreation programs. As programs expand or
additional parks are developed, the impact on current staff levels and the need for
additional staff will be evaluated.
2. Healthy Balanced Activities - Provide a balanced mix of passive and active recreation
opportunities.
Active recreation - Predominately muscle-powered activities such as jogging, cycling, field and
court sports, etc.; they commonly depend on developed sites.
Passive recreation - Activities that require very little use of muscle power, such as nature
viewing, photography, or picnicking.
Historically Auburn Parks and Recreation Department emphasis was on sports and active
recreation. While the Department and park facilities are still more oriented toward active
recreation, recent development has included walking trails and appealing natural environments
more conducive to a quieter experience in our parks.
Objectives
• Develop a park system that provides facilities for social, cultural and physical activities.
• Provide parks areas that accommodate passive recreation opportunities such as
picnicking and walking.
• Provide park areas that accommodate active recreation such as ball fields, skate parks,
spray parks, sports courts, etc.
• Track changing trends at the local, state, and national levels. Respond with appropriate
programs and facilities to meet changing needs as funding and budgets are available
and meet the level of service expectations of the citizens of Auburn.
• Provide access to healthy foods through the continued operation of the Auburn
Farmer's Market and Community Gardens.
3. High Quality Parks - Provide a system of high quality parks that are well maintained and
aesthetically pleasing.
ORD.E Page 376 of 751
Parks are one of the most visible public features in a City, their design and maintenance can
influence people's perceptions of the community. Long term maintenance, good design, and
the use of high quality materials will all affect the appearance of a park for years to come.
Objectives
• Develop Level of Service Standards to assure that citizen expectations are met.
• Parks shall be intentionally designed to require low maintenance, and low water and
energy consumption. Higher maintenance features like fountains or annual beds are
reserved for high visibility locations or as appropriate.
• Select environmentally friendly materials that are durable and aesthetically pleasing.
• Parks shall exhibit a "cared for" appearance through close attention to maintenance.
• In order to maintain parks in a safe and attractive condition, maintenance staff levels
will be evaluated with additions of new park land or facilities.
• Renovate deteriorating features. Identify conditions that require redesign or
construction of new facilities; schedule and budget necessary changes in the City's
Capital Facilities Plan.
• Conduct regularly scheduled inspections to identify necessary repairs and upgrades to
ensure safe conditions.
5. Positive Image through Parks - Provide a park system that contributes to a positive
city image for Auburn.
Auburn's Comprehensive Plan contains a goals and objectives to enhance the City's identity by
ensuring a quality visual environment. Parks are an effective tool in improving visual
appearance, but many of Auburn's parks are tucked away in residential neighborhoods, unseen
and unknown except to residents. This lack of visibility hinders the parks from effectively
contributing to the city's overall appearance. Increased visibility and high quality design are
paramount to "advertising" our community as a good place in which to live and work.
Aesthetic and environmental improvements can also play an important role in community
appearance. Maintenance and retention of existing trees and landscaped areas in our
developed park areas, as well as planting new trees will improve the feel in our parks and public �
spaces. In addition to our trees and landscaped areas, public art plays a vital role in improving
aesthetics around the City. Created in 1988 by the City of Auburn Arts Commission, the Art in
Public Places Program is the thread that connects art, people, and place throughout Auburn.
City staff and a group of consultants are currently going through a revitalization process for the
downtown core area, which has the potential to create a particularly strong image of Auburn.
This is an area seen and visited by most residents and many visitors. The high visibility of
downtown, and the need to strengthen and renew the downtown core, make it an especially
desirable location for "green spaces" in the areas encompassed by Plaza Park and City Hall
ORD.E Page 377 of 751
Plaza. The following objectives are intended to improve the image of Auburn through sensitive
park design:
Objectives
• Select new park sites that enjoy high visibility. This may be accomplished by locating at
least one side of larger parks along arterial streets.
• Increase the quantity of trees, shrubs and ground covers in parks.
• Continue to work on Tree City USA goals for better Urban Forestry design and tree
preservation.
• Create a green spaces in the downtown core that will be a focal point for community
activities and stimulate economic growth.
• Incorporate artwork as part of new park development or when upgrading existing parks
or other public facilities.
6. Ope11 SpBCe and Natural Areas - Acquire and manage important open spaces in the
City of Auburn.
Undeveloped open spaces contribute to the well-being of our community in many ways. We
value them for their ability to provide buffers from urban encroachment; to provide
opportunities for recreation; to provide public access to creeks, rivers and other water bodies;
to create distinctive settings within the city; to provide connections between different areas for
both people and wildlife; as well as offering health and safety benefits.
Objectives
• Maintain and protect a system of forested corridors and buffers to provide separation
between natural areas and urban last uses.
• Target significant open space areas in the City, with emphasis on their planning and
acquisition. Target areas include the land along the Green and White Rivers, steep
hillsides, Mill Creek Corridor and West Hill Watershed.
• Explore all possible funding mechanisms to enable the acquisition of open space on a
regular basis to identify properties as they become available.
• City owned open space lands shall be accessible to the public wherever possible and
appropriate.
• Provide adequate management and maintenance of public open spaces, ensuring their
ability to provide environmental benefits and wildlife habitat.
• When mitigation is required, develop a monitoring and maintenance plan to ensure
successful establishment.
• Involve the community in habitat restoration activities through the City's annual Clean
Sweep event, community service days, and an adopt a park program.
7. Trails— Provide a network of pedestrian and bicycle trails.
ORD.E Page 378 of 751
The needs of all citizens must be considered when developing a comprehensive multi-use trail
system. Being able to move throughout the city and region without a car is becoming more and
more important as we are increasingly aware of environmental pollution and traffic congestion.
The following objectives are offered as ways to enhance our trails system to become a more
truly multi-modal environment:
Objectives
• Develop a network of trails created or extended to provide adequate coverage for both
commuting and recreational cyclists. Locations for east/west trails shall be identified
and developed.
• Acquisition of land for the proposed Green River Trail shall continue to be a priority.
• Trail design and layout shall take advantage of unique natural locations and provide
access to a variety of landscapes and habitats.
• Participate in planning activities for regional trails in South King County and North Pierce
County.
• Explore possibilities for new trail connections between Auburn and neighboring
communities.
• Develop and maintain trails to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act.
• Provide safe trail system by discouraging crime through environmental design concepts.
• Develop a standardized interpretive and way-finding program to be used throughout
our trail system.
• Identify and provide funding to maintain existing trail systems.
8 - New Parks—Expand our existing park inventory where level of service standards are not
being met, with an emphasis on the West Hill and Lea Hill areas of the City.
The development of new parks gives the community the unique ability to continue to shape the
city in ways that are beneficial to all. Over the last two decades significant areas to the west
and east of Auburn have been annexed into the City. Land acquisition is a fundamental
requirement for new parks, and becomes increasingly challenging in economically difficult
times. Optional methods for financing or acquiring land must be explored to meet the ,
challenges ahead.
Objectives
• Make the development of community parks and linear parks with trail systems a priority
over small neighborhood parks when possible and appropriate.
• Apply for King County Conservation Futures grants and other available funding sources
to acquire and preserve park land and natural areas.
• Acquisition of community amenities, such as shoreline property, shall be emphasized, to
preserve or allow public access to these special places.
• Minimize land use conflicts between parks and other uses, and use sensitive design
measures when locating parks in residential neighborhoods.
ORD.E Page 379 of 751
• Criteria for new park development ensures consistent high quality design meeting the
needs of the community.
• Develop Master Plans for undeveloped park properties and incorporate future park
development costs into the Capital Facilities plan as appropriate.
• Schedule public meetings as a part of the Master Planning process to ensure that citizen
voices are heard and needs are met when developing new parks.
• Develop public gathering spaces in the downtown core.
ORD.E Page 380 of 751
ORD.E Page 381 of 751
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 382 of 751
Chapter 5
Our Park System Today
Inventory and Recommendations
Over its 113 year history, and under the leadership of past and present Mayors and City
Councils, Auburn acquired property through donations, dedications and purchases to create the
park system of today. Individual parks are evaluated and renovated periodically to assure they
meet and exceed changes in recreational trends, and aesthetic appeal, safety and government
standards. To serve both current and future residents, the City needs to continue to acquire
new park land and to maintain and improve existing parks and properties.
This chapter explores the city parks. We take a look at individual parks, listing facilities and
making recommendations for future improvements. The recommendations that are listed for
each park include the six year timeframe that this plan covers. Evaluation considers:
location
condition and appropriateness of recreation equipment
amenities
facilities
maintenance
aesthetic quality
unique features
recreational trends
Much like the last Park Plan update, residents responding to the public opinion survey strongly
overwhelmingly favored operating and maintaining the existing parks. To operate and maintain
city parks and facilities (85 percent) had the highest percentage of important functions to
provide in the city. The following pages will give us direction in the years to come for ways to
accomplish these goals.
Summary of Park Evaluation
Although parks are unique,there are common conditions they share. The recreation
components need to continue to be well-designed and maintained. Heavy use combined with
natural aging requires rehabilitation. The Parks and Recreation staff have worked hard to
develop strong recreation programs and build relationships with private teams and clubs that
use City facilities so maintaining functional and aesthetically pleasing facilities is important.
Parks and open space areas can provide a "green oasis" in an increasingly urban environment.
Aesthetic improvements such as additional landscaping, improved site furnishings, and the
screening of objectionable views are desirable to achieve this vision.
ORD.E Page 383 of 751
Summary of Needs
Many needs fall into one of the categories summarized below. As parks age, they need annual
maintenance as well as occasional minor and major renovations.
• Prepare Plans —Prepare long and short term plans for the maintenance and
development of all existing parks.
• Rehabilitate Older Parks — Replace outdated recreation equipment. In some instances
a complete redesign of a park or a use area is warranted.
• Landscape Improvements — Rehabilitate old or overgrown plantings. Use sound
environmental design to create aesthetically pleasing park and open spaces areas and to
encourage intended uses. Use native and drought tolerant plants.
• Provide Screening — Provide visual and physical buffers (such as landscaping) between
two incompatible use areas, such as residences and active recreation areas.
• Improve Site Furnishings — Provide more benches and seating, bike racks, wayfinding,
water fountains, and trash receptacles. Remove old chain link fencing; where needed,
replace with decorative fencing in highly visible locations. Black PVC coated chain link
fencing in less visible locations.
• Provide Additional Components — Add passive recreation components to parks, such
as trails, nature walks, horticultural display gardens and art. Design attractive spaces for
adult visitors adjacent to playgrounds.Take advantage of natural beauty and unique
settings, such as views of the White River at Game Farm Park.
• Design of New Parks — Build on the unique aspects of each site. Integrate historical
information and artwork. Preserve mature trees. Locate parks so streets or greenbelts
serve as buffers between the park and other uses. Meet accessibility requirements;
design some facilities to encourage use by specific disabled users. Connect to
neighborhoods with recreation/transportation trails.
The Americans with Disabilities Act
In 1990 the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law. This act implemented
sweeping measures at the federal level, and focused on the importance of accessibility to
publicly and privately owned facilities. In Washington state, additional accessibility design
requirements have been rewritten into a single legal document, with enforcement
responsibility placed in the hands of the local building officials. The regulations became
effective July 1, 1992. Compliance with both state and federal law is required in Washington.
Civil Rights Protection
ORD.E Page 384 of 751
The ADA is legislation that gives civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities. It is an
anti-discriminatory law, not merely a compendium of architectural guidelines. The law is
intended to assure that a person is not excluded from participation in an activity or place due to
a physical or mental condition. The Department of Justice emphasizes the need to consult with
disabled individuals or organizations representing the disabled to determine the needs and
priorities of local citizens.
ORD.E Page 385 of 751
Inventory of Parks and
Recommendations
Included in this section is a short description of each park in the City of Auburn and a list of
recommended improvements for the next six years. These do not constitute a true
maintenance or development plan, as suggested earlier, but give some idea of the major
concerns in each park.
Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed primarily for non-
supervised, non-organized recreation activities. Features include:
Size: Less than 5 acres
Service Area: % mile radius
Typical features:
. Play Structure
• Picnic Facilities
. Walking Trail
. Barbecue Grill
. Open Space/Nature Areas
. Outdoor Basketball Court
. Multi-use playfields
• Tennis courts
Table 5-2: Existing Neighborhood Park Inventory:
Park cres
2155 Street Playground .17
uburndale Park g.�q
uburndale II(Und) .34
Ballard Park .68
Cameron Park 3.85
Cedar Lanes Park 8.36
Doroth Bothell Park .35
D kstra Park 1.67
Forest Villa Park .21
Gaines Park 1.33
Indian Tom Park .42
ornada Park 1.89
Kerse A 2.73
Kerse B .79
Lakeland Hills Park 5.06
Lea Hill Courts 1.18
River oint Park 2.95
Rotar Park 3.89
Scootie Brown Park 1.68
ORD.E Page 386 of 751
Shau hness Park 3.46
erminal Park 1.22
illage Square 1.10
TOTAL: 66.08 Acres
Map Needs: Map of Neighborhood parks with% mile radius
Photos: Photos of Neighborhood park Features
ORD.E Page 387 of 751
Neighborhood Park
215t Street Playground
405 215t Street SE
0.17 acres
Dedicated in 2006
This small pocket park is situated adjacent to a City stormwater detention pond. Park amenities
include a playground, picnic table, and benches. The park is on a short list of parks that need to
go through the naming process.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Bike rack
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 4
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill(s) 3
Other Notes: Playground in good condition and other park amenities are in good
condition.
Park History:
The 215t Street Playground was constructed in 2006 with volunteers during the City's annual
Clean Sweep event. The construction of the playground was primarily a result of the residents
ORD.E Page 388 of 751
in the surrounding neighborhoods not being satisfied with the level of service for neighborhood
parks in the area.
ORD.E Page 389 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Auburndale Park
31700 108th ST SE
9.74 acres
Transferred in 2003
Auburndale Park falls into the neighborhood park category, and like many in this classification, is
underused. The City is considering design options to create an entrance on the east side of the
park in order to provide better access to the surrounding neighborhoods in an effort to increase
use in the park. The main feature of the park is a natural wooded area with a loop trail. There is
a play area, picnic tables and barbeque grill.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Arbor
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail—'/<mile walking trail
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 4
Barbeque Grill(s) 3
Other Notes: Playground in good condition, arbor in good condition, several trees in
poor condition.
ORD.E Page 390 of 751
Park History:
Transferred from the King County Parks Department in 2003.The name came from a designation of an
area on old plat maps of the surrounding area of Auburn.
Recommended Improvements
. Remove and Grub blackberries in the eastern portion of the park
. Construct entrance from 110th Ave. SE
. New park entry sign
. Install 3 new benches
• Replace trash receptacles
. Install new bike rack
• Replace existing play structure
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 391 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Auburndale Park II (Undeveloped)
29725 118th ST SE
9.34 acres
Transferred in 2003
Auburndale II is an undeveloped park with a mix of native overstory, and an understory that is
dominated by Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. A future trail connecting Lea Hill to the
valley floor is being considered, which would likely run east to west along the northern
boundary of the park.
Park History:
Transferred from the King County Parks Department in 2003. The name came from a
designation of an area on old plat maps of the surrounding area of Auburn.
Recommended Improvements
• Prepare a Master Plan to develop the park
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 392 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Ballard Park
1612 37th Way SE
0.68 acres
Dedicated in 1966
Ballard Park is situated along the north side of the White River and has a view of the river, but
there is no direct river access. The main feature of the park is a distinctive stone picnic shelter
that is first come first serve. In 2003, a new playground and irrigation system was installed, as
well as pathways and an entrance gate.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1/2 basketball court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility: Picnic Shelter
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 1+2 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s) 1
Other Notes: Adjacent to Stuck River,all amenities in good condition.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 393 of 751
Named after Dr. Levi Ballard, an early pioneer who, in 1865, came with his wife from Oregon to
the Puget Sound by covered wagon. He had planned to start a medical practice in Seattle, but
that city already had two physicians. David Neely offered the Ballards hospitality when they
arrived and settlers encouraged Dr. Ballard to stay in the White River valley. After leasing an old
log cabin from the Neelys, they built a house near what is today,Third Street and Auburn Way
North and later built another home at First and Auburn Avenue. Dr. Ballard founded the site of
downtown Auburn and filed for the first plat of the town of Slaughter in 1886.
Recommended Improvements
• Renovate existing picnic shelter
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 394 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Cameron Park
3727 Lemon Tree Lane
3.85 acres
Dedicated in 1989
Cameron Park is a nestled between two rows of houses, east of the Muckleshoot Indian
Reservation.The park has two entrances, one near the intersection of Lemon Tree Lane SE
and Academy Drive SE, and the other off of Lemon Tree Lane SE. Visitors can take an asphalt
path into the heart of the park that winds through a large grassy open field, planted with
occasional trees. A colorful play structure is located in the northeast corner of the park.
Picnic tables next to the playground provide seating for picnics or for caretakers of young
children. The layout of the path provides a good opportunity to integrate the play area into
the rest of the park using landscaping to create a more lush and cohesive setting. A limiting
factor in achieving this is the utility easement of Northwest Pipeline, which reduces the ability
to landscape and improve some parts of the park.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): Yes
Basketball Court�s): '/: Basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s) 1
Other Notes: All amenities in good condition.
ORD.E Page 395 of 751
Park History:
Named for dairy farmer Bruce Cameron, who donated property for a park when his property
was sold for a housing development.
Recommended Improvements
. Install landscape plantings around the perimeter of the park for screening
from the surrounding neighborhood
• Install two new picnic tables and concrete pads
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 396 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Cedar Lanes Park
1002 25th Street SE
8.36 acres
Dedicated in 1969
Cedar Lanes Park is a unique combination of native woodland, well-kept lawn, and a formal
playground. The forested area contains a mix of western red cedar, big leaf maple, and
cottonwood trees. Unfortunately, recent removal of the native understory has been done by
the parks maintenance staff in order to improve site corridors, and deter transient activity and
drug use.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls: 8
Trail: Trail
Benches: 1
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Playground in good condition.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 397 of 751
Named for the development area in south Auburn and for the number of Cedar trees Iocated on
the property.The property was purchased with IAC money in late 1967.
Recommended Improvements
• English ivy and blackberry removal
• Landscape restoration where understory has been removed
• Fence repair
• Kompan Free Play sports court
• Regrade/repave parking lot
• Community Garden
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 398 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Dorothy Bothell Park
1087 Evergreen Way SE
4.35 acres
Dedicated in 2009
Located adjacent to the Lakeland Hill Community Center, Dorothy Bothell Park is a an attractive
neighborhood park in Lakeland Hills. Park amenities include a playground, climbing boulders,
and a trail that connects with other trails beyond the park. Dinosaur bones have been buried in
the play area for the kids to uncover.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s�:
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): Yes
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail '
Benches: 4
Picnic Tables: 3
Barbeque Grill(s)
Playgrounds:
Other Notes: Playground featuring a swing set, climbing boulders, climbing pets
and hidden dinosaur bones for kids to uncover. All amenities in good
condition.
ORD.E Page 399 of 751
Park History:
Dedicated in 2009, the park was constructed through a partnership between the City of
Auburn,Tucci &Sons, and Eagle Scout projects from Scout Troops#323, #401, and #510. It is
named in honor of Dorothy Marion Bothell who devoted her life to her family,the family
business and civic duty. Appointed in 1950, Bothell served as Auburn's first female council
member and was also active on the Cemetery Board, served the Red Cross, organized the first
chapter of the Women's Business and Professional Club, and was a member of many other
local and regional service clubs.
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for porothy Bothell Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 400 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Dykstra Park
1487 22"d Street N E
1.67 acres
Dedicated in 1979
Dykstra Park is a small, attractive park along the Green River. Its linkage to the larger Isaac
Evans Park via a suspension bridge increases its value to the community. The bridge was
substantially repaired in 2002, with major structural repair completed on the north end of the
structure.
Dykstra is primarily a playground neighborhood park, and its proximity to the river also makes it
popular with walkers and wildlife lovers. A new playground was installed in April 2015 made
possible by a Dr. Pepper/ Kaboom! Playgound grant. The playground was constructed using
volunteer labor during the City's annual Clean Sweep volunteer event. In addition to the three
new playground pieces, approximately 150 cubic yards of playground fibar wood ships were
placed within the play area.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail connects to Brannan Park and Isaac Evans Park
Benches: 1
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill�s)
Playgrounds:
Other Notes: Footbridge over Green River to Isaac Evans Park, Adjacent to Green River.
Play equipment in good condition, old play surface is hard.
ORD.E Page 401 of 751
Park History:
Named after Henry Dykstra, an early pioneer and dairy farmer. Henry Dykstra emigrated from
the Netherlands to Michigan in 1888 and relocated to the Puget Sound in 1895. During the
Yukon Gold Rush he sold milk in Dawson and throughout the territory for seven seasons. In 1908
he purchased a 94-acre hop farm at Thomas, north of Auburn, calling it Maple Water Farm. He
farmed and established a major dairy farm. The property remained in the family's hands until
1967. The park is located on two acres of the Dykstra's former farm.
Recommended Improvements
• Structural review of the Green River footbridge
. Selective tree removal
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 402 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Forest Villa Park
1647 Fir Street SE
0.21 acres
Dedicated in 1971
The Forest Villa Park is located on small lot in a single family residential neighborhood. A play
structure is the primary focus of the park. Park amenities include play equipment, safety
surfacing, benches, landscaping, irrigation and a picnic table.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s�:
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 1
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill(s)
Playgrounds:
Other Notes: All amenities in good condition. Missing tire swing?
Park History:
Named for the development adjacent to the park.
ORD.E Page 403 of 751 I
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 404 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Gaines Park
1008 Pike Street NW
1.33 acres
Dedicated in 1999
Gaines Park is located in the Vistaria/Sunning Hills residential area. This park is a joint project
between the the City's Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation.There is a short section
of boardwalk through a wetland area on the east edge of the park. The park has a picnic area,
play area, %z basketball court, and a walking trail through the park.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): %: Basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Walking trail
Benches: 5 seats
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Picnic Area, Storm Retention Pond,Adjacent to wetland area, playground
in good condition, but needs fibar wood chips.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 405 of 751
Dedicated in May, 1999, and named for former Auburn Mayor Robert E. "Bob" Gaines, 1964-
1969.This park is a joint project between the Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation.
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 406 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Indian Tom Park
1316 6t"Street NE
0.42 acres
Deeded to the City in 1979 from King County
This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. A playground was
installed in April 2014 made possible by a Dr. Pepper/ Kaboom! Playgound grant. The
playground was constructed using volunteer labor at the City's annual Clean Sweep volunteer
event.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s�:
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: New playground/swing set installed spring 2014, 1 bench is damaged.
Park History:
Named after Indian Tom,Tom Wil-Etch-Tid, a friend of the white settlers who saved the lives of
Dr.John King and other pioneer children during the White River massacres during 1855.
ORD.E Page 407 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• Install a ADA ramp at the play areas
• Landscape improvements
• Install additional picnic tables and benches
Map Needs: MapofPark—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 408 of 751
Neighborhood Park
lornada Park
1433 U Court. NW
1.89 acres
Dedicated in 2004
This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. It contains a play
structure, climbing wall, picnic tables and a short loop trail.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): % Basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Small Climbing Wall
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail—%mile
Benches:
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s) 1
Other Notes: All amenities in decent condition, most of the trail is unpaved, muddy and
sloped with no stairs. ',
Park History:
Named for the neighborhood, the park was completed in 2004.
ORD.E Page 409 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 410 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Kersey A
5480 Charlotte Ave. SE
2.73 acres
Dedicated in 20XX
This park was constructed to meet level of service needs for a neighborhood park within in
newly developed Kersey III nieghborhood. A paved walking trail with picnic tables and benches
connects the ball field, to the playground and the basketball court. The park is on a short list of
parks that need to go through the naming process.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s): Informal field with backstop.
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): Basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail—% mile
Benches: 3
Picnic Tables: 3
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Park is in relatively new, and in good shape.
Park History:
Named for the surrounding neighborhood.
ORD.E Page 411 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Kersey A Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
Neighborhood Park
Kersey 6
1433 U Court. NW
0.79 acres
Dedicated in 2004
This park has similar features and amenities as nearby Kersey A, but on a smaller scale. This
park is also on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): %z Basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Small Climbing Wall
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Paved trail
Benches: 3
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Park is in relatively new, and in good shape.
ORD.E Page 412 of 751
Park History:
Named for the surrounding neighborhood.
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Kersey B Park for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
Neighborhood Park
lakeland Hills Park
1401 Evergreen Way SE
5.06 acres
Dedicated in 1993
Lakeland Hills Park serves the Lakeland development in south Auburn. This five-acre park is
nestled into a wooded hillside, where many native trees were saved and integrated into the
design of the park. The park provides active recreation facilities at a neighborhood scale, and
also a paved trail around the circumference of the park. Restroom facilities were built in this
park and share a common structure with some water utility equipment.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s): 1
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility: Restroom Building, Picnic Shelter
Parking Stalls:
Trail: Trail
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 3 +4 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Native Woodland, all amenities in good condition. Playground equipment
is older style wood.
ORD.E Page 413 of 751
Park History:
Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it.
Recommended Improvements from 2006 plan
• Replace and expand play structure
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 414 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Lea Hill Tennis Courts
32121 105th PI. SE.
1.18 acres
The Lea Hill Tennis Court has a unique location on top of a City of Auburn water reservoir.
Originally, two courts were constructed, but one of these is now being used as a basketball
court. The remaining tennis court is not currently used for its intended purpose because
vandalism to the net.The courts on Lea Hill, surrounded by an adjacent apartment complex.
Standing water is evident in several low areas.
Park Features:
• Tennis Courts
• Views of Green River Valley
• %z court Basketball
Recommended Improvements
• No recommendations for Lea Hill Courts for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 415 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Riversands
5014 Pike Street NE
1.76 acres
Dedicated in 2015
This pocket neighborhood park located is along the Green River near the northern City Limits.
Visitors can gain direct access from the park to a bridge across the river that connects to the
City of Kent's S. 277t" Street Trail (1.1 miles). The future Green River Trail will run along the
eastern boundary of the park if the trail is ever extended through Auburn.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s�:
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1/2 basketball court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 5
Picnic Tables: 2 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Adjacent to Stuck River, all amenities in good condition.
ORD.E Page 416 of 751
Park History:
Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it. The
park was turned over to the City if 2015
Recommended Improvements
Park History:
Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it.
Neighborhood Park
Rota ry Pa rk
2635 Alpine Street SE
3.89 acres
Dedicated in 1966
Rotary Park was developed in 1966 by the Auburn Rotary Club. At first glance the playground is
the only apparent facility here.The rolling topography, unusual shape of the site and the
location of conifers obscure the presence of the other major recreation facilities, including the
basketball court and informal softball field. An additional acre, and a half-court basketball was
added to Rotary Park in connection with the development of the Riverwalk neighborhood.
In 2008 Rotary Park received an extreme makeover when an irrigation system was installed,
grading was completed, landscape rocks were placed and new benches were installed.The
Rotary Club of Auburn contributed to a new playground and helped with the installation of the
equipment. The neighbors surrounding the park helped complete the project by planting nearly
300 plants and spreading beauty bark throughout the park.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): 1
Basketball Court(s): %z Basketball court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility: I
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches:
Picnic Tables: 2 '
ORD.E Page 417 of 751
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: .25 Paved Trail (future). All amenities in good condition, playground
missing spring toy.
Park History:
Named for the Rotary Club, who helped to secure funds for its development.
Recommended Improvements
• Construct ADA ramp into the play area
• Landscaping improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 418 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Scootie Brown Park
1403 Henry Road NE
1.68 acres
Dedicated in 1973
The park is located at a junction between commercial and residential zones. Bounded on the
north by 8th Street N.E., the park has a busy, open feel, with minimal landscaping. The City's
youth baseball programs use this park for practice.
Park Features:
Playgrounds:
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s): 1
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s): 1
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Water Fountain, 1 set of Bleachers
Facility:
Parking Stalls: 31
Trail:
Benches: 2 in Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Surface on courts in good condition.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 419 of 751
Named for Stanley W. "Scootie" Brown, who was a popular high school baseball player
nicknamed for his ability to "scoot" fast and get around the bases. He was a banker in Auburn
for 56 years, and a member of the Kiwanis—with 35 years of perfect attendance.
Recommended Improvements
• Install a 6' tall black vinyl fence w/pedestrian and vehicular gates
• Landscaping and irrigation improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 420 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Shaughnessy Park
3302 215L Street SE
3.46 acres
Dedicated in 1973
Shaughnessy Park is located in an attractive setting of mature Douglas Firs on a quiet residential
street. Several recreational courts are located in close proximity to the street. An open play
field with a backstop is in a corner of the park and is not readily apparent from other parts of
the park and street. The adjacent residential neighbors have erected fences between their
backyards and the playing field. Recent park improvements were made possible by a
Neighborhood Block Grant in the amount of$50,000
Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years (2011-2015):
� At Shaughnessy Park, renovations to the old tennis court included: removal of the asphalt and
rock base of the court, removal of the old fence surrounding the tennis court,spreading 300
yards of topsoil and seeding the area to create a pleasant, open, lawn area.All of this work was
accomplished with in-house staffing. (2012J
• An irrigation system was installed. (2012)
• The old dilapidated playground at Shaughnessy Park was replaced and a new picnic area was
added. (2011)
• The basketball court was resurfaced,the court painted and the basketball backboards and
hoops were removed, sand blasted and powder coated. (2011)
• The volleyball court was converted to a pickle ball court, new asphalt was laid and the court was
painted. (2011)
• New sidewalks to the basketball court, playground and picnic area were installed.(2011)
• During Clean Sweep,volunteers removed the old playground, and cleaned out ivy and other
noxious weeds from the hillside and wooded areas.Volunteers also spread beauty bark in
landscape beds and repainted the practice wall. A Neighborhood Block Grant in the amount of
$50,000, helped fund the park improvements. (2011)
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): Playfield with backstop
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s): 1
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
ORD.E Page 421 of 751
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 4
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Everything in almost new condition.
Park History:
Named for former Mayor lames N. Shaughnessy who served from 1960—1964. As a member of
a pioneer family and an avid historian, Mayor Shaughnessy was one of the founders of the
White River Historical Society.
Recommended Improvements
• Ball field improvements—New backstop
• Landscaping and irrigation improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 422 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Terminal Park
1292 C Street SE
1.22 acres
Dedicated in 1913
Terminal Park is a small park along a quiet residential street. The newly renovated playground
at the center of the park is the focal point here.The remainder of the park contains a slightly
rolling lawn, with mature trees scattered throughout. Improved irrigation has also been added.
In 2013 broken patio pavers were replaced with colored concrete in the patio adjacent to the
playground.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): 1
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 3
Picnic Tables: 3
Barbeque Grill(s) 2
Other Notes: Playground in good condition, maple tree in NE corner should be
removed.
ORD.E Page 423 of 751
Park History:
In the 1920s was the first park developed in Auburn and named for the terminal end of the
railroad, and the neighborhood where the railroads workers lived,Terminal Park.
Recommended Improvements
• Landscape improvements
• Turf improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 424 of 751
Neighborhood Park
Village Square
12111 SE 310`h Street
1.10 acres
Tranferred in 20XX
This is a small pocket park is located in the middle of an apartment complex. The park has a
short loop trail with a small grassy area in the middle. Access to the park can either be gained
from the adjacent apartment complex or from SE 310th Street. The park is on a short list of parks
that need to go through the naming process.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): 1
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility:
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 3
Picnic Tables: 3
Barbeque Grill(s) 2
Other Notes: Playground in good condition, maple tree in NE corner should be
removed.
ORD.E Page 425 of 751
Park History:
This park was transferred from King County in 20XX and named for the surrounded apartment
complex.
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 426 of 751
Community Parks
Parks providing active and structured recreation opportunities for all ages. They often exceed 10 acres in
size and may have sports fields, water playgrounds or bodies of water, garden, nature trails, or similar
features as the central focus of the park. Community parks can provide indoor facilities to meet a wide
range of recreation interests. They require more support amenities such as parking and restrooms than
neighborhood parks.
Community parks serve a much larger area than neighborhood parks and offer more facilities. Where
there are no neighborhood parks, the community park serves as the neighborhood park function. The
service area covers a one to two mile radius.
Size: 10+ acres
Service Area: 1-2 mi. radius
Typical features:
• Children's play structure
• Picnic facilities
• Sports fields
• Tennis Courts
• Bodies of Water
• Gardens
• Nature Trails
• Parking
• Restrooms
Park Acres
104 Ave SE(Lower Green River 14.73
Housing Bend Property)
Brannan Park 21.68
Fulmer Park 5.04
Game Farm Park 57.20
Game Farm Wilderness 48.50
GSA Park 531
Isaac Evans Park 19.87
Jacobsen Tree Farm(und.) 29.30
Lea Hill Park 5.26
Les Gove Park 14.68
Mill Pond Park 4.20
Roegner Park 19.22
SunsetPark 15.15
Veterans Memorial Park 7.67
Total 267.81 acres
Map Needs: Map of Community parks withl mile service radius
Photos: Photos of Community park Features
ORD.E Page 427 of 751
Community Park
Brannan Park
1019 28th St. NE
21.68 acres
Dedicated in 1973
Brannan Park contains one of Auburn's most heavily used sports complexes. The City sponsors many
sports events at Brannan Park; Cascade Middle School users and a variety of organizations—youth
soccer leagues, and Little League-also use the playing fields extensively.
Brannan Park is on a flat, open site, with the Green River forming the park's eastern boundary. The
remaining sides are bounded by residential housing to the north and west, and Cascade Middle School
to the south.
Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years:
• Over 200 volunteers joined forces with Delta Air Lines employees and representatives from
KaBoom! to build a new playground at the park. (2013)
• King County completed the Reddington Levee setback project, increasing flood protection and
improving fish habit associated with the Green River. In addition an approximate 1-mile paved
trail along the top of the levee was connected to the park. (2013)
• New energy efficient Musco lights were installed on Fields#2 and #3; and new fencing,
bleachers, soccer goals, and turf surface improvements were made possible through funds
donated Auburn Youth Soccer Associated and a King County Youth Sports Facilities Grant (YSFG).
(2009)
• Field 4 received new surfacing, fencing, bleachers, and soccer goals with a YSFG from the
Washington State Conservation Office (RCO). (2008)
• The irrigation system was completed. (2003)
• A complete loop trail within the park was constructed that has a connection to the levee trail.
(2002)
• Lights on Fields#1 and #2 were installed to provide more efficient lighting for the ball fields less
intrusive to the neighborhood. (2002)
• The outfield fence for Field #2 was replaced and arborvitae was planted. (2001)
• A skatepark was constructed, and picnic tables and benches were added to the adjoining area.
(1999)
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s): 2
Baseball Field(s): 1
Soccer Field(s): 1
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Skate Park
ORD.E Page 428 of 751
Facility: Restroom Building, Concession Stand
Parking Stalls: 174
Trail: Paved Trail-0.66 mile (connects to Green River Trail)
Benches: 5+22 in Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 4
Barbeque Grill(s):
Other Notes:
Park History:
Named after the families of brothers William and Joseph Brannan who homesteaded in the White River
Valley in the mid-1800s. William Brannan and his wife were killed during the early Indian wars.Joseph
married Sarah Henness in 1857.They purchased the Meeker Farm in Kent in 1858, and finally moved to
their donation claim near Auburn in 1868.
Recommended Improvements
• Asphalt Pavement Repair & Overlay
• Remove & Replace Concrete Curb
• Demolish Backstops & Dugouts on Field #4
• Field Illumination
• Landscape/Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 429 of 751
Community Park
Fulmer Park
1005 5th Street NE
5.04 acres
Dedicated in 1979
Fulmer Park is primarily an active sports facility. In 2015 an undeveloped area on the north side of the
park was bladed, all of the blackberry bushes were removed, and a new perimeter fence was installed.
New irrigation, perimeter landscaping, and grass seed was added in 2014. New backstops, fencing,
dugouts and drinking fountains, as well as scorekeeper tables, were added to the park in 1998.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s): 2
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: 2 Water Fountains
Facility: Restroom Building
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 1 + 12 in Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 1
Barbeque Grill(s):
Other Notes: Playground is in decent condition, a bit beat up but stable.
ORD.E Page 430 of 751
Park History:
Named for a former Auburn retailer, Frank Fulmer, who owned an ice cream business in Auburn and was
known for giving ice cream to children in town. Gene Colburn was on the Park Board and promoted
naming the park for him.
Recommended Improvements
• Replace & Expand Play Structure &Sitework
• West Parking Lot Repair, Overlay& Striping
• Remove & Replace Curb
• Sports Field Illumination Upgrade
• Landscape/Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 431 of 751
Community Park
Game Farm Park
3030 R ST SE
57.20 acres Dedicated in 1988
Game Farm Park continues to be one of the largest and most frequented parks in Auburn.The park
contains a wide variety of facilities for organized sports activities as well as a distinctive natural setting.
The hillside backdrop and the White River along its southern edge create an intimate setting for park for
users to enjoy. The park with its many courts, fields and picnic facilities is heavily used. Game Farm Park
was dedicated in 1988 and exhibits many successful design features. Designing and building the park in
one phase resulted in functional architectural features and site layout. Passive uses such as trails or open
grassy slopes are located where the park abuts residences. Good pedestrian access is available to the
surrounding neighborhood at several points along the park's perimeter. A trail head off of Forest Ridge
Drive SE provides access to a relatively unimproved gravel trail along the river in the eastern portion of
the park.
Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years:
• A$20,000 Dr. Pepper/Kaboom! Grant helped to replace and expand the large playground in the
eastern portion of the park. Additional work in the vicinity of the playground included a new
sitting wall, concrete sidewalk, and new benches were also installed. (2012)
• The patio area between baseball fields#2 and #3, and the patio in front of the baseball
concession stand were resurfaced. (2012)
• The basketball courts were surFace painted to match the tennis courts and pickle ball courts.
(2012)
• The City received a $58,500 KC YSFG to make improvements to the tennis courts at Game Farm
Park The tennis court improvements included repairing root damage, repainting playing surface,
installing a practice wall, installing a fabric wind screen, and removing trees that were causing
damage to the courts. (2011)
• The City received a $225,000 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant to accommodate
lighting improvements. Fourteen light poles and 142 light fixtures were replaced with 6 light
poles and 40 energy efficient light fixtures on the turf fields at Game Farm Park. (2010)
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 2
Softball Field(s): 3
Baseball Field(s): 1
Soccer Field(s): 2—synthetic turf
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s): 2
Tennis Court�s): 4
Other:
Facility: Picnic Shelter, Len Chapman Amphitheater, Outdoor Exercise Stations
Parking Stalls: 303
Trail: Trail
Benches: 15+16 in Dugouts
ORD.E Page 432 of 751
Picnic Tables: 31 Total, 16 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s) 7 Total,4 in Picnic Shelter
Other Notes: Sports Complex, Adjacent to Stuck River. Everything is in pretty good
condition,except for missing play structure.
Park History:
The park is built on a historic wild game refuge once owned by the King County Game Commission. In
1933, ownership was transferred to the Washington State Department of Game. It was an experimental
facility for bamboo partridge, quail, ring-necked pheasants, tinamou and other exotic birds. In 1978 the
land transferred ownership to the State Parks and Recreation Commission. The City of Auburn signed a
long-term use agreement in 1984 which provided that the City cooperate with the State Parks to
develop the 160-acre site as a park.
Recommended Improvements
• Remove & Replace Synthetic Turf on Rectangular Field 1
• Remove & Replace Synthetic Turf on Rectangular Field 2
• Improve Parking Lot Drainage
• Resurface Paved Trails
• Demolish Existing Care Takers Residence
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 433 of 751
Community Park
Game Farm Wilderness Park
2407 Stuck River Dr. SE
48.50acres
Dedicated in 1989
Game Farm Wilderness Park emphasizes a connection with the natural environment. It has limited
development and has preserved most of the native woodland along the White River.The White River
Trail continues along the river on the north side of the park from Kersey Way beyond the east end of the
park. The park is designed for both overnight and daytime visitors. The camping area is designed to
accommodate recreation vehicles, providing each unit with water and power hook-ups.
Park Features:
Playgrounds:
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: RV Camping Area
Facility: Restroom Facility, Picnic Shelter, Day Camp Area
Parking Stalls: 40
Trail: Trail conects to Roegner Park
Benches: 20
Picnic Tables: 34
Barbeque Grill(s) 19 Fire Pits
Other Notes:
Park History:
This property was built by the state Department of Parks on land that was formerly a game and wildlife
area. This area was part of the Washington State Department of Game property across the White River,
which is now Game Farm Park.
ORD.E Page 434 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• Landscape Improvements
� Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
• Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 435 of 751
Community Park
GSA Park
413 15th St.SW
5.31 acres
Dedicated in 1966
The land for GSA Park was donated to the City by the U.S. General Services Administration. Its location in
a heavily trafficked industrial zone has resulted in an atypical park setting. Currently the park has two
youth softball/baseball fields, a parks maintenance building, and dugouts. New dugout covers were
recently added, made possible by donations from Auburn Little League. A greenhouse is located on the
property near the maintenance that is used by the City's horticulturist to propagate new plants. The
completion of the two fields was completed in 2003, including drinking fountains and an asphalt trail to
the ball fields. The park is in need of a play structure and a restroom facility.
Park Features:
Playgrounds:
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s): 2
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: 4 Bleachers
Facility: Greenhouse, Park Maintenance Shops
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 8 in Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 2
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: 12 picnic tables and one set of bleachers are stored here during winter
months.
Park History:
Named for the General Services Administration, which is located south of the park. The property was
granted by this group.
ORD.E Page 436 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• Install A Concession Pad For Mobile Concession Stand
• New Restroom Facilities
• Improve Open Playfield Area In The Northern Portion Of The Park
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 437 of 751
Community Park
Isaac Evans Park
29827 Green River Road SE
19.87 acres
Dedicated in 1989
Isaac Evans Park is a riverfront park providing valuable passive recreation opportunities for the citizens
of Auburn.The park's connection to Dykstra Park via the suspension bridge increases its accessibility to
local residents and is an appealing feature for visitors. The pedestrian bridge may also accommodate
future trail connections between the eastern and western sides of the river. A internal paved trail runs
around the circumference of the park. The forested riparian area along the Green River remains in a
natural condition with recent restoration plantings added to accommodate the Reddington Levee
Setback project located across the river from the park. Scattered throughout the grassy space on the
inside of the trail are clusters of picnic tables, a picnic shelter, restroom facilities, and playground
equipment.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): 1
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Building
Parking Stalls: 57
Trail: Trail connects to Dykstra Park
Benches: 5
Picnic Tables: 21 Total,4 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill�s) 5
Other Notes: Access to Green River. Playground is old wood style but in decent
condition.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 438 of 751
Dedicated in 1989, and named for an early pioneer, who farmed along the Green River
Recommended Improvements
• Parking Lot Improvements
• Replace Play Structure
• Repair Paved Trail
• Landscape And Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 439 of 751
Community Park
Jacobsen Tree Farm Park (undeveloped)
29387 132nd Ave. SE
29.30 acres
Transferred in 2003
The lacobsen Tree Farm property is an undeveloped park located in the Lea Hill area of Auburn. The City
went through a master planning process for the future park, which was completed in 2010. Future
elements of the park include soccer fields, baseball fields, play grounds, and passive recreational
opportunities. The park is adjacent to Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and Auburn Mountainview High
School, and has magnificent views of Mount Rainier. A bond or levy will be needed in order to develop
this large community park property.
Park History
This undeveloped park property was transferred from King County to the City of Auburn in 2003, and the
area was annexed into the City of Auburn in 2007. Historically the site was a tree farm that was owned
and operated by the Jacobsen family where they grew a variety of evergreen and birch trees.
Recommended Improvements
• Explore funding options to develop the park
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 440 of 751
Community Park
Lea Hill Park
31693 124th Ave. SE
5.26 acres
Dedicated in 2013
Lea Hill Park is a community park that serves the Lea Hill neighborhood and is located adjacent to the
Green River Community College Campus. Park amenities include a skate park, pervious walking
pathways, a rentable picnic shelter, an amphitheater, baseball field,free game synthetic sport area, half
basketball court, and a play area featuring a tractor and climbing toys. An ADA accessible restroom
facility with two unisex bathrooms and drinking fountains was completed in the spring 2015.
A$60,000 KC YSFG helped fund the synthetic sport area and a $20,000 KaBOOM! Dr Pepper Snapple
Group Construction Grant helped fund a portion of the playground equipment.
Park Features: I
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s): 1
Soccer Field(s): 1 small-scale soccer and multipurpose synthetic turf field
Open Play Field(s): yes
Basketball Court�s): % basketball court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court�s): 1
Other: Skate spot
Facility: Picnic Shelter,Amphitheater area
Parking Stalls:
Trail:
Benches: 4+7 Seats in Playground
Picnic Tables: 8
Barbeque Grill(s) 2
Other Notes: Public Art—Strawberry Calf by Michael McLaughlin
ORD.E Page 441 of 751
Park History:
The park was previously located near the corner of SE 320`h Street and 124`h Ave SE, but only contained
a full sized baseball diamond and a softball field. The old location was the home field for the Green
River Community College baseball and softball teams, and was also used by Auburn Little League. The
property where the park is today was acquired as part of a land exchange with Green River Community
College that occurred in 2012. The current park is located just north of the original park property.
Recommended Improvements
• Landscaping Improvements
• Resurface Synthetic Turf On Kompan Free Game Court
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 442 of 751
Community Park
Les Gove Park/Les Gove Community Campus
910 9th St. SE
14.68 acres
Dedicated in 1966
Les Gove Park is a recreational and educational facility serving the entire community. The Library, Parks
and Recreation Administration Building, Community Center, Teen Center, Senior Center, the White River
Valley Museum, and a variety of recreational features make Les Gove a very popular destination. A Park
Master plan was completed in 2015 in order to help define park elements, and create a roadmap for
near term and long range planning concepts for the entire campus. A major outcome of the Master Plan
was to establish the Auburn Community Campus that features Les Gove Park.
The park has residential development on roughly three sides, and is bound by 12th Street SE to the south
and Auburn Way South to the west. Existing entrances to the park are not ideal, as they pass through
residential or commercial settings, and can be unclear to a first time visitor to the park.
Approximately 3/4 of Les Gove Park is developed with a youth softball field, patios, a splashpad, the
Discovery Playground, and a concrete pad used for kids concerts in the summer. The remaining portions
of the park are comprised of grassy open areas used during special events in the park.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 2
Softball Field(s): 1
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): yes
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Spray Park; Bocce Courts,Outdoor Exercise Stations
Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Building
Parking Stalls: 0
Trail: % mile looped trail
Benches: 23+2 in Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 19
Barbeque Grill(s) 1
Other Notes: Includes Gymnasium, PRAB Admin Building, Senior Center, White River
Valley Museum,Auburn Library and Les Gove Building, (accessible)
Discovery Playground, Rotary Spray Park,Views of Mt. Rainier. 10
benches are located in the bocce court, 25 seats at spray pool.
ORD.E Page 443 of 751
Park History:
Named for former Mayor Leslie J. Gove, who served from 1936—1946 and again in 1955 for only two
months. Gove was mayor during the time the park property was converted from undeveloped land to a
housing development for war workers. When the property was approved for the development of a
fifteen acre park in 1960, Councilman Fred Towner was instrumental in getting the park named for
Mayor Gove. Mayor Gove's family members were early pioneers in the area, who moved here in 1875.
They farmed north of Auburn and put in the first water system in the area, giving them running water
from a source on the West Hill to their back porch.
Future Community Center
The construction of a 21,000+square foot Community Center and Teen Youth Center began in August
2015, and is expected to be completed in June 2016. The multi-use and multi-generational building will
be used for educational, cultural, social activities, and will house Park Administration staff. Emphasis for
the community center will be made on creating spaces that will attract teens and encourage cross-
generational interactions with the existing neighboring teen center. The community and teen center will
be created by renovating the existing Parks and Recreation Building(approximately 7,300 sq. ft.) and
adding approximately 13,700 sq. ft. of new building space.
Gymnasium
The 9,859 sq. ft. gymnasium was opened in October 2011 at the Auburn Community Campus.
Participants can drop-in to a variety of programs, including open gym basketball, volleyball, pickleball
and futsal (indoor soccer); a youth after-school program, an indoor playground designed for ages 5 and
under, family nights, and rock climbing instruction. Organized programs include volleyball and
basketball leagues, specialized recreation leagues, preschool sport classes, and rock climbing classes.
Additionally, birthday party packages are offered using the gymnasium as an activity center complete
with a party host, pizza or a birthday cake, and treat bags for birthday party guests. The facility is also
available for rentals and other special events.
SeniorCenter
The Senior Center is a 12,000 square foot, one story, brick structure, constructed and completed in
2002. The structure features a large room dining/meeting area which will hold 200 people, a commercial
kitchen, meeting rooms, a pool hall, computer lab, and a large reception/gathering area.
Library
The City of Auburn and the King County Library system entered into an agreement where a new library
building was constructed and completed within the Community Campus in 2012, owned by the City, but
a branch of the King County Library system. The library is at the southwest corner of the park, with
access gained from Auburn Way South.
Museum
The White River Valley Museum, cooperatively managed by the City of Auburn and the White River
Valley Historical Society, is located behind the Library in Auburn Community Campus. It is also a one
story building. Inside is a reconstruction of a log cabin, the reproduction of Auburn's Main Street at the
turn of the century, a caboose representative of the railroad history of Auburn, and a representative
ORD.E Page 444 of 751
display of the Native Americans and other early residents of the area. Additionally, the museum has
revolving exhibits on a variety of historical subjects and a unique gift shop. Outdoor features include
antique farm machinery displayed in an enclosed area. The farm machinery will likely be relocated to the
Olson Canyon site in the future.
Recreational Area
The outdoor recreational component of Les Gove Park is found primarily in the south 2/3 of the park. A
half-mile paved trail encircles an attractive bermed and treed area including 100 flowering cherry trees
given by the Japanese Sister City Lions Club of Kasuga-Cho in 1984. Other recreational features include a
softball field, informal play fields, splash pad and, and bocce courts. The water playground located in Les
Gove Park is one of the city's favorite features for young children. Currently, a single playground site
serves the park.
In June 2014 the Auburn community celebrated the opening of the 32,000 sq. ft. Discovery Playground.
This unique playground features accessible surfacing; play opportunities that support all levels of
development; elevated sand tables, water, and auditory elements; a cozy spot to gather; areas to swing,
spin, balance, roll and play. The rocks at the highest level near the hill slides represent Mt. Rainier and
two textured walking paths characterize the White and Green Rivers. The amazing support and
community involvement in this project is proof once again that Auburn is a City with incredible heart. A
community fundraising team was formed to raise $300,000 for the project and a community design
team of agency professional, occupational therapy professionals and a youth representative helped to
design the playground. Donations were received by 71 separate funding sources, including individuals,
corporations and businesses, granting agencies,foundations, service clubs, children and service
providers.
Recommended Improvements
• Multi-Purpose Building Renovations
• Lighted Crescent Concrete Walk From South Parking lot to Community Center
• H Street Extension
• Roundhouse Pavilion Near The White River Valley Museum
• South Parking Lot Overlay
• Site Furnishings
• Deals Way Demolition
• New Restroom
• Paved Trail Overlay
• Construct New Section of Paved Trail in the Southern Portion of the Park
• Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 445 of 751
Community Park
Mill Pond Park
4582 Mill Pond Dr. SE
4.20 acres
Dedicated in 1997
Mill Pond is unique in several ways.The park is a joint project between the Parks and Public Works
Departments, the Auburn School District, and the developer of Lakeland Hills. All of these groups came
together to create a park with a dual purpose:to provide a recreational experience in a natural setting,
and to provide stormwater detention and filtering for a 400 acre area.The site includes a permanent
pond, a grass-lined bio-swale that becomes a temporary pond during storms, a 1/4 mile paved trail
around the circumference of the ponds, and a fishing dock. Fishing in the pond is limited to children
under 15.
Park Features:
Playgrounds:
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Fishing Pond
Facility:
Parking Stalls: 0
Trail: Trail
Benches: 2
Picnic Tables: 3
Barbeque Grill(s)
Other Notes: Combined stormwater and park facility
Park History:
ORD.E Page 446 of 751
The park was named after Mill Creek, which runs through it. This joint project between the Storm Water
Division and Parks and Recreation, has a three-story- deep water retention vault under the tennis courts.
Recommended Improvements
• No improvements are recommended for the 6 year timeframe
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
�
ORD.E Page 447 of 751
Community Park
Roegner Park
601 Oravetz Road SE
19.22 acres
Dedicated in 1994
This community park is located along the banks of the White River, adjacent to Auburn Riverside High
School. A trail system includes both hard and soft-surfaced sections that meet the needs of many
different users, including equestrians from the nearby Hidden Valley neighborhood.Trail construction in
1997 from the east side of Roegner Park to Kersey Way and continuing east along the river to Game
Farm Wilderness Park and beyond. An approximate %z- acre off-leash fenced dog park is located near
the trail, and can be easily accessed from the parking area off of Oravitz Road. Commissioned artwork
for the park includes a uniquely designed bench with a salmon motif, placed to allow views of the river.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s): Yes
Basketball Court(s):
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other:
Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Facility
Parking Stalls: 40
Trail: Trail
Benches: 16
Picnic Tables: 29, 6 in Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s) 4
Other Notes: Public Art. Swing set is in good condition. Playground equipment has
several rotting boards which need replacing. Several picnic tables and
benches have rotting, broken or missing boards needing replacement.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 448 of 751
Named for former Councilman and Mayor Bob Roegner (1982—1993)
� Recommended Improvements
• Replace Play Structure
• Drainage Improvements
• Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
�
� �
ORD.E Page 449 of 751
Community Park
Sunset Park
1420 69th St. SE
15.15acres
Dedicated in 2003
Sunset Park was developed by the developer in Lakeland Hills. It is unique in several ways. The
community park serves the Lakeland Hills neighborhood but also the community. The site includes a
picnic shelter, two youth baseball/softball fields, trails, basketball court and skatepark. Fundraising and
planning efforts began in early 2015 for a splashpad with a targeted completion date tentatively set for
summer 2016.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s): 2 (youth baseball/softball)
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s�:
Basketball Court(s): 1
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Skate Park
Facility: Restroom Facility, Picnic Shelter
Parking Stalls: 154
Trail: Trail (s?)
Benches: 4+ 12 inside Dugouts
Picnic Tables: 16, inside Picnic Shelter
Barbeque Grill(s) 2
Other Notes: All structures are in good condition.
Park History:
ORD.E Page 450 of 751
This park was designed and developed by the developers of Lakeland Hills in conjunction with the City of
Auburn.The name was selected by a citizen's group, who decided to name it for the wonderful views of
� the sunset from the park.
Needs Assessment from 2006 plan
The park was completed in 2003 and is in good condition, requiring regular ongoing maintenance.
Recommended Improvements
• Splash Pad
• Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
�
�
ORD.E Page 451 of 751
Community Park
Veterans Memorial Park
405 E St. N E
7.67 acres
Dedicated in 1926
Veteran's Memorial Park, formerly City Park, is a popular community park located close to downtown
Auburn and adjacent to Auburn High School's Memorial Stadium. The park is distinctive for its Veterans
Memorial structure, shady woods and underlying expanse of green lawn.The Veterans Memorial
structure was funded with donations and fund-raising events by local veterans groups. Its design and
construction were accomplished with use of volunteer labor.
Park Features:
Playgrounds: 1
Softball Field(s):
Baseball Field(s):
Soccer Field(s):
Open Play Field(s):
Basketball Court(s): %2 basketball Court
Pickle Ball Court(s):
Tennis Court(s):
Other: Backyard Idea Garden
Facility: William C. Warren Building (capacity: 74)
Parking Stalls: 40
Trail:
Benches: 8
Picnic Tables: 10
Barbeque Grill(s) 2
Other Notes: Six benches are concrete,two are in Backyard Idea Garden. Spray pool
has been removed. Playground is in good condition.
Park History:
Formerly named City Park, the park was dedicated and opened in 1926, and was "touted as the largest,
most up-to-date and complete (park) in all the surrounding country". Money for the park came from a
1924 bond issue and the property was purchased from the Faucett family. Renamed in 2000 to honor
Auburn Veterans groups who built the Veterans Memorial in the park.
ORD.E Page 452 of 751
Recommended Improvements
• Selective Tree Removal
� • Resurface Basketball Court
• Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detai)
Photos of Park Features
�
�
ORD.E Page 453 of 751
Community Park
104th Ave SE (undeveloped)
31495 104th Ave. SE
14.73 acres
Transferred in 2006
This undeveloped riverside property is comprised of two parcels along the Green River. A nice sandy
beach along the Green River is popular for swimmers in the summer, and fishermen in the fall and
winter months. Nearly two-thirds of the park is located within the 100 floodplain so given the location
of the park along the river and regulatory constraints,the park will likely be designed as a passive use
nature park.
Park History:
The 104t"Ave property was transferred to the City through acquisitions from Washington State Parks
through a grant from the Recreation and Conservation office, and the other from King County.
Recommended Improvements
• Develop Master Plan
Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail
Photos of Park Features
ORD.E Page 454 of 751
�
Open Space
Open space areas are land that is largely undeveloped,and that has been left in a natural or natural
appearing condition.Other areas in the inventory are included with their respective park.
Size:varies
Service Area:Not applicable
Typicalfeatures:
• Nature Areas
• Wildlife Area
• Specific Park left in natural condition for future development
• Wetland area
Table 5-4:Existing Open Space Inventory:
pen Space cres
uburn Environmental 190.91
Clark Property 26.68
Game Farm Open Space 26.00
Golf Course 0.98
Lakeland Nature Area 6.07
Mary Olson Farm 7.00
West Auburn Lake .25
� otal 386.89 acres
Map Needs:Map of Open Space areas
Photos:Photos of volunteer events
Auburn Environmental—For the purpose of this plan the Auburn Environmental Park(AEP)has been
divided up into open space and special use areas. The open space area is comprised a large
undeveloped Category II wetland area bisected by SR 167,while the special use area is comprised of the
parcels of land where the boardwalk and bird tower are located. On the east side of SR 167 there are
two large wetland mitigation areas along Clay Street NW. One of the mitigation,known as Thermod has
a large pond,and was installed to compensate for impacts associated with the Emerald Downs Race
Track Facility. The other large mitigation area was installed to accommodate the City's B Street Corridor
project. The Interurban trail runs up the east side of much of the AEP. On the west side of SR 167 Mill
Creek and an associated wetland flows north across the property. The west side of SR 167 is the site of a
large future stream relocation known as the Wetland 5K project where Mill Creek will be relocated back
to its relic channel. Construction of the Wetland SK project is expected to be completed in fall 2015.
Clark Property Forested open space area along the White River Trail,just west of R Street. The property
is located on both sides of Oravitz Road. Bowman Creek crosses this property along the toe of the slope
below Oravetz Road before flowing into the White River
�
ORD.E Page 455 of 751
Game Farm Open Space- Undeveloped forested area located on a plateau in the northeast portion of
Game Farm Park. This area overlooks the White River to the east and is bordered by the a residential
development to the north. A trailhead is located off of Forest Ridge Drive SE in the residential
development that provides access to a trail system through the forested area. The discrete trailhead is
located between two homes and is fairly difficult to find if you don't know that it is there. This area has
been a popular spot for transient camps,which has resulted in limited use of the area by park users.
Golf Course Open Space—Mostly forested area located on a steep west facing slope along the eastern
edge of the golf course. A power line easement runs east west across the northern portion of this area.
Lakeland Nature Area Assemblage of parcels located west of Fire Station 33 in the Lea Hill area of the
City. The property contains forested wetland areas,but the extent of these areas is currently unknown.
This park property will likely be a passive use park with a trail system,but a master plan is needed in
order establish near term long term plans for the site.
Mary Olson Farm Open Space—Forested area on a west facing slope in the eastern portion of the Mary
Olson Farm Property. These areas contain very large mature trees that overlook the farm. Olson Creek
flows through a steep ravine from the east before flowing across the property and into the Green River.
Olson Creek supports five different species of salmon,as well as steelhead trout and bull trout. Three of
the fish species supported by Olson Creek are protected under the Endangered Species Act.
West Auburn Lake—This property is located at the terminus of S.320`h Street in the West Hill area of
Auburn. Access to the site can gained from the west via S 320th Street or from the east via W Street
NW. The site contains an approximate 2-acre lake,with approximately 7 acres of mature forested
upland area. A Master Plan was developed for the park in 2013. Future site improvements identified in
the Master Plan include a trail around the perimeter of the lake,a parking area at the end of 5.32ptn
Street,viewpoints with benches,invasive species control,and the installation of native plantings.
ORD.E Page 456 of 751
Special Use Areas
Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or land occupied by a specialized facility.
Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small landscaped areas,community gardens,
streetscapes,environmentally sensitive areas,viewpoints,historic sites,and other specialized areas.
Size:Generally very small,"leftover"spaces
Service Area:Not applicable
Typicalfeatures:
• Landscaped Areas
• Community Gardens
• Viewpoints
• Historic Sites
• Nature Areas
• Traffic Islands
• Specific Park or Recreation Areas
• Environmental Park
Existing Special Use Areas Inventory:
Special Use Areas Acres
B Street Plaza 0.10
Bicentennial Park 1.07
Centennial Viewpoint Park 0.70
City Hall Plaza 1.10
'lark Plaza 0.25
.:ommunity Garden A 1.04
Community Garden B 0.39
Environmental Park 16.84
Fenster Nature Park 12.58
Fly-in Lion 0.02
Golf Course 139.71
Mary Olson Farm 20.0
Mountain View Cemetery 46.57
Pioneer Cemetery 0.77
Plaza Park 0.02
Slaughter Memorial 0.02
TOTAL 254.77 acres
ORD.E Page 457 of 751
B Street Plaza-a small pocket park in downtown Auburn featuring artwork
Bicentennial Park-Green open space park at Auburn Way and Hwy 18
Clark Plaza-small pocket park at the corner of Auburn Way North and 15th Street NE.
Morningcrest-a landscape area at 58th&24th NW
Slaughter Memorial-small pocket park at Auburn Way North with the memorial commemorating the
battle of Slaughter
Fly-in Lion-Small pocket park located at the south end of Scobee Field(Auburn airport)with benches to
watch the Airplanes take off and land. The park is located on King County transit property at the
northeast corner of a park and ride.
ORD.E Page 458 of 751
Special Use Area
Centennial Viewpoint Park
402 Mountain View Dr.
0.7 acres
Dedicated in 1991
Centennial Viewpoint Park was created in 1991,during Auburn's Centennial year.As its name implies,it
is blessed with tremendous views of the Green River Valley,the Cascade Range,and Mount Rainier
beyond.The park is tucked into a small spot along Mountain View Drive,across the road from Mountain
View Cemetery.This small park functions primarily as a scenic overlook.A bronze sculpture of a deer
standing on a log,overlooking the valley,was commissioned by the Auburn Arts Commission for the site.
Park Features:
• Artwork
• Picnic tables
• Views of Mt. Rainier
Park History:Was developed by the Auburn Rotary Club during Auburn's centennial year celebration.
ORD.E Page 459 of 751
Special Use Area
Environmental Park
413 Western Avenue NW
16.84 acres plus
190.91 acres of open space
Designated in 2004
The Auburn Environmental Park(AEP)has been divided into open space areas and special use areas.
The special use area of the AEP is located in the southern portion of the park. Here visitors will find a
birding tower and an elevated boardwalk through a large wetland area. The boardwalk extends north
from West Main Street to the birding tower,which located off of Western Ave NW. An information
kiosk,picnic tables and a parking area are also located off of Western Ave.NW.
Park Features:
• Wetland Mitigation Areas
• Bird tower
• 1,200 foot elevated boardwalk with interpretive signs
• Picnic tables
Park History:
In 2004 City Council passed a resolution expressing interest in the Environmental Park Project. The
formation of the AEP was made possible through a number of land acquisitions between 1996 and 2014,
which resulted in a permanently protected area 207 acres in size.
Recommended Improvements
• Trail Connection Between Boardwalk and Interurban Trail
• Construct Boardwalk in Northern Portion of Park
• Routine Maintenance and Inspections to Boardwalk Structure
ORD.E Page 460 of 751
Special Use Area
Fenster Nature Park
2033 4th Street SE
12.58 acres
Acquired in 1996
Fenster Nature Park is located along the Green River where the river flows into the City limits. Two
phases of buried revetments have been constructed on the property,Fenster I was completed in 2008
and Fenster II was completed in 2014. Upon completion of these revetment project the areas were
planted with native vegetation.
A sandy beach located along the Green River is a popular spot for swimmers and tubers. The
beach is actually located upstream of Fenster Nature park on property owned by King County,but
visitors must cross through the park in order to gain access to this area. Parks staff is currently working
with a consultant to a develop a design for a river access for emergency responders,drift boaters,
rafters,and tubers.
Park Features:
• Swimming and tubing access to the Green River
• Access to a trail system located upstream on King County property
• Public fishing access
Park History:The northern portion of the property was acquired through a series of land acquisitions
that occurred between 1994 and 2014. The southern portion of the park was purchased in 2006 from
he Fenster Family,who owned and operated a farm along the river.
ORD.E Page 461 of 751
Special Use Area
Auburn Golf Course
29630 Green River Rd SE
139.71 acres plus
Open Space of 40.98 acres
A full-service 18-hole facility,the fair but challenging par 71 course is just over 6,450 yards and hosts
over 50,000 rounds of golf each year.Services include a pro shop,equipment and power cart rentals,
professional instruction and lessons,tournaments and leagues,and youth activities. The majority of the
course is in the valley,with four holes on the hillside overlooking the valley.
The Auburn Golf Course offers an assortment of top notch facilities.Our Pro Shop has much of the
newest gear at great prices. If you are hungry after your round of golf,be sure to stop in for a bite at our
new Bogeys restaurant
Park Features:
• 18 hole golf course
• Clubhouse
• Putting Green
• Views of Green River and Mt.Rainier
Park History:The City purchased the Green River Golf Course in the 1960's.It was a 9-hole course on the
north end of the current site,built in the late 1940s.After the city took over,it was developed from 9-
hole to 18-hole course.
Recommended Improvements
• Working with Golf Course Superintendent to determine recommended improvements
ORD.E Page 462 of 751
• Special Use Area
Mary Olson Farm
28728 Green River Rd NE
20 acres pius
47 acres of Open Space land
Purchased in 1993
The City applied for and received King County Conservation Futures funding to purchase the historic
Mary Olson Farm in 1993.The funding stipulates that the Farm can be developed for passive recreation
and open space use only.The 67-acre Farm is on the National Register of Historic Places,and is a King
County Landmark property.The private canyon in the center of the farm includes a farmhouse,large
barn,a weaving house,and several other out buildings surrounded by forested hillsides and two
meadows.The Mary Olson Farm is the most intact 1880s family farm in King County.The buildings,and
to some extent the landscape have required extensive restoration.To that end the buildings have been
leased to the White River Valley Historical Society so that they can be economically and quickly restored
using grant funds.
The Farm includes many important historic features:a wagon road;seven historic buildings,an heirloom
orchard;four runs of salmon in Olson Creek;two meadows;all surrounded by forested hillsides.The City
intends to continue restoration efforts on the Farm and its environment to use as a living history
museum attracting school groups and members of the general public.The wagon road will be able to
connect area trails and bicycle routes in the area.In 2000 an award winning Master Plan was developed
for the Farm,and in 2004 an Operations Plan was developed,creating a year by year plan leading to full
qrogram offerings and public access in 2014.
Park Features:
• Historic Farmstead
• Meadows
• Bluff and Creek
Park History:
Named after the matriarch of the early settler family who purchased the land in 1879—Mary Olson.
2015 Needs Assessment
Since 2014 the Farm has been fully restored and has been undergoing specialized maintenance care.
That work must be ongoing and constitutes an annual investment. Future projects include recreation of
the historic footbridge over Olson Stream,reclaiming land from blackberries and other invasive species
and returning that land to native growth and producing hay fields.Future improvements will include the
development of trails;acquisition of uphill canyon land as a conservation easement;development of an
interpretive site dealing with Native American fishing and gathering;replacement of the caretaker's
mobile home;installation of interpretive artwork to enhance the walking experience;and development
of additional programs that share this remarkable site with a boarder audience.
ORD.E Page 463 of 751
'r�flO:i�S Qi P�CK F.(.,>�ti:7c5
ORD.E Page 464 of 751
Special Use Area
Mountain View Cemetery
2020 Mountain View Dr.
60.00 acres
Mountain View Cemetery is nestled on 60 acres of property overlooking the Mt. Rainier and the Green
River Valley. Mountain View offers an urn garden,adult graves,columbarium niche walls,and a special
section for veterans and their spouses.The Cemetery was established in 1890 when 40 acres of land
were purchased.In 1945,a group of local businessmen formed the Thousand and One Club to transfer
the cemetery to the City of Auburn.In 1947,the cemetery was endowed,ensuring that maintenance of
the grounds would be continued into the future.
Park Features:
• Children's Place and Veterans Section
• Urn garden
• Niche walls
• Mausoleum
• Views of Green River Valley and Mt.Rainier I
Park History:
Mountain View was established in 1890,a year before the town of Slaughter(now Auburn)was
incorporated.This is the resting place of some of the early pioneers who settled in Washington Territory.
4ecommended Imp�ovements
ORD.E Page 465 of 751
Special Use Area
Pioneer Cemetery
8th&Auburn Way N.
0.77 acres
Pioneer Cemetery,located at 8th N.E.and Auburn Way North,near Fred Meyer.The land was donated
in 1878 to the town of Slaughter,Washington Territory,for a cemetery.It was only active for 20 years
due to spring flooding.In 1917,land on the east edge was given to the Buddhist Church at Christopher
for use by the Japanese community.Burials at Pioneer Cemetery are rare,as only cremated remains of
descendants who were originally interred there are eligible.The grounds at this historical site are under
the care of the Cemetery Division of the Parks Department.
Park Features:
• Ornamental Iron Artwork
Park History:
Donated to city in 1878.
ORD.E Page 466 of 751
Schools and Other Public Lands
People don't use only parks for their recreation.Other public lands and private facilities must be
considered in evaluating the sufficiency of our public park system. In Auburn,schools are one of the
largest contributors to recreation space other than the City parks.
5chools
School grounds are natural gathering places for neighborhoods—there is usually one within walking
distance of every home in the city.In addition,school grounds have features,which,at a minimum,
include sports fields,grassy fields for open play,and sometimes play equipment and basketball courts.
School facilities vary in their accessibility and availability.During the school year these are in use by the
school throughout the day and often after school hours.This limits their use by individuals or non-school
leagues.Also,some sports fields are too small or not in prime condition considered necessary for league
play.For these reasons school facilities are considered to be valuable components in the community's
total recreational resources,but cannot replace a strong public park system.
Map shows the location of all schools within the study area.Table 5-6 summarizes the facilities found at Comment(jwkl]:7here is no map ofschools in ',
Auburn School District properties. Note:the Aubum School District extends beyond the Aubum City ""b°'"
Limits.
Other Public Lands
Several properties are used informally for recreation purposes are owned by public entities.The major
properties are identified below:
'able 5-6 UPDATE:Auburn School Facilities
School Facilities (do we need to add playgrounds to this list)
I—list needs to be updated
— —I
Elementary Schools
Alpac �2 youth baseball/softball fields
Chinook 4 youth baseball/softball fields
Evergreen Heights 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Gildo Rey 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Ilalko 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Lakeview _ 3 youth baseball/softball fields
Lea Hill 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Dick Scobee _ __ 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Pioneer 3 youth baseball/softball fields
Terminal Park 2 youth baseball/softball fields
Washington ,2 youth baseball/softball fields
Middle Schools
Cascade I1 Football Field with Track,
Gymnasium with 1 basketball court,Annex
2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields
ORD.E Page 467 of 751 I�!
Mt. Baker I1 Football Field with Track,
2 Gymnasium
'�3 Baseball Fields,90'&65'fields
3 Softball Fields
Olympic 1 Football Field,Track,
Gymnasium with 1 basketball court
2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields
Rainier 1 Football Field,Track
Gymnasium with 2 basketball court
2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields
Senior High Schools �
� Football Field synthetic turf with Treck(Lighted),
8 Tennis Courts
5 Gymnasiums
Auburn Riverside High 1 Basebal Field,90' infield,3 softball fields
1 Football Field synthetic turf with Track(Lighted),
8 Lighted Tennis Courts
Gymnasium with 2 basketball court
Auburn Senior High 1 Baseball Field,90' infield
1 Football Field with Track,
I6 Gymnasiums, 8 Tennis Courts
Aubum Mountain View High 'I2 Baseball Fields,90'&65'fields,2 Softball Fields
1 Baseball/Softball Field, 65'infield
West Auburn High 1 Gymnasium
ORD.E Page 468 of 751
Auburn Water Utility
The watershed areas owned by the Auburn Water Utility.These have restricted access in order to
maintain water quality.Coal Creek Spring Watershed in south Auburn is the major source of the city's
water supply.The West Hill Watershed is considered a secondary water source;its location next to an
elementary school make it a popular spot for neighborhood walks.Public use of these areas is presently
discouraged by the Water Utility.
King County Parks
King County Parks owns several developed and undeveloped properties in close proximity to the
planning area.While existing Auburn parks are more convenient to Auburn residents than most King
County properties,recreation users are not restricted by civic boundaries,therefore some of these parks
can be expected to serve Auburn residents.
The Green River Trail is a King County regional trail project that currently winds more than 19 miles from
Cecil Moses Park near Seattle's south boundary to North Green River Park in south Kent near Auburn.
The section of the Green River Trail that extends south from the City of Kent has stalled out in recent
years due to private property issues,but there is still hope that one day it will extend through Auburn. A
section of the trail was constructed in 2014 as a part of the Reddington Levee project near Brannan Park,
which could easily be extended north to S.277th Street. The section of the Green River trail south of
8rannan Park presents many private property challenges,and may have to follow surface streets in
order to make it to Fenster Nature Park and beyond.
�tate of Washington
The State of Washington owns an easement along the west side of the Green River in certain locations
through the city.Much of the easement runs directly behind residences where access is allowed for
fishing only.The Washington Department of Natural Resources also owns a quarter section of land in
southeast Auburn.The land is not used for recreation at this time.
ORD.E Page 469 of 751
ORD.E Page 470 of 751
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 471 of 751
Chapter 6
Recreation and Cultural Programs
Auburn—an Active Community
The City of Auburn Parks,Arts& Recreation Department provides opportunities for the public to
participate in diverse recreational programs and activities designed to meet the needs of the
community. These programs include preschool, youth, teen, and adult leisure programs; youth,
teen, and adult athletics; fitness and weliness programs; programs designed to provide social
and recreational opportunities to senior citizens and those with special needs, as well as a host of
special events and cultural activities suitable for the entire family and community at large.
The City of Auburn Parks,Arts& Recreation Department has an active series of recreation and cultural
programs.Survey results show over 75%of the city's population participate in at least one of these
programs with over 30% participating on at least a monthly basis.
Analysis of recreation programs repeatedly revealed the need for indoor spaces for many types of
athletic,cultural and recreational activities. Current programming is conducted at the Parks,Arts and
Recreation Administration Building,Senior Center,City Hall,the multi-purpose building at the Auburn
Community Campus,the William C.Warren Building at Veterans Memorial Park, and various school
district facilities.
The addition of a gymnasium in 2011 has allowed for increased athletic programming opportunities.A
new community center and teen center are slated to open in 2016; adding to the inventory of spaces
available for programming a robust schedule of activities and programs for the community.
A Variety of Departmental Programs
Programs within the Parks,Arts& Recreation Department are divided into five major activity areas:
• Athletic Programs
• Leisure and Education Programs
• Health and Wellness Programs
• Heritage and Preservation Programs
� Cultural Programs: Arts and Events
City residents are offered a broad selection of leisure time activities contributing to social interaction,
physical recreation and health, and cultural and artistic enrichment.The components of each program
area and the future needs are described individually in this chapter.Some general conclusions and
recommendations are also made about all programs offered by the City.This overview guides the City's
direction to maintain the high quality of its recreation programs.
ORD.E Page 472 of 751
According to the 2015 survey,the top programs and activities that Auburn residents have a combined
high and moderate level of participate in (regardless of the location) are as follows(Question#10):
• Running or walking—88.74%
• Visiting nature/wildlife areas—77.56%
• Attending community special events—59..58%
• Bicycling—55.07%
� Attending live theater/concert performances—54.73%
• Nature/Environmentaleducation-46.69%
• Using exercise equipment-45.68%
• Recreation swimming-44.86%
• Adult fitness/health/wellness classes—40.54%
The same survey asked respondents what recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (either by
the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize.Their combined highest and
moderate likelihood of use was as follows (Question#11):
• Festivals or events—77.69%
• Fitness/health/wellness programs—64.59%
• Volunteer opportunities—57.08%
� Performing arts(dance, music,theater,etc}—51.87%
• Outdoor sports—51.31%
• Nature and environmental education—51.09%
• Enrichment and self-help classes—49.80%
• Visual arts—43.26%
• Indoor sports—41.60%
The survey also asked respondents what recreation programs by age groups should be offered in Auburn
(by the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize.Their combined highest and
moderate likelihood of use was as follows(Question#12):
• Adults—68.03%
• Teens(middle & high school)—65.77%
• Elementary school youth—41.29%
• Seniors(at or near retirement)—40.89%
• Toddlers/preschoolers—27.44%
• Developmentally Disabled (all other ages)—12.84%
• Developmentally Disabled (school age)—12.34%
Conclusions/Recommendations for All Recreation Programs
1. Increase Awareness: Continue to increase awareness of recreation programs by trying new
marketing avenues, including social media outlets.
ORD.E Page 473 of 751
2. Expand offerings for general fitness, health and wellness programs.According to survey results,
there is a higher interest level among residents for offering general fitness, health and wellness
programs(64%)than outdoor sport leagues (51%) or indoor sport leagues(41%).
3. Class Scheduling: Offer classes with both daytime, evening and weekend hours,to meet the
needs of those without traditional 8-to-5 work schedule.While space shortage has impacted
this in the past,the addition of a new community center and youth/teen center will aid in class
scheduling. Continue to seek additional spaces, either through rental, lease or purchase for
indoor recreation programs in heavily dense neighborhood areas, such as Lakeland Hills and Lea
Hill.
4. Families, Neighborhoods&Cultural Connections: Reinforce family structure and interaction by
offering activities or outings suitable to families. Continue to offer some programs at
neighborhood locations,thereby strengthening the role and identity of neighborhoods in the
city. Continue to seek ways to engage different cultures in recreation programming,through
activities,food experiences, and social gatherings. Based on survey results,87%of respondents
want programs offered for all ages.
5. Nature and Environmental Education: Increase exposure to the natural world through activities
and fun learning opportunities at suitable locations.As parks are developed around wetlands
and other natural areas, residents and students can be involved in all stages,from design to
implementation and maintenance.Adult environmental education can also inform residents of
the functions and value of our open spaces (and the care and awareness of our urban assets).
Survey results indicate that over 50%of respondents would be interested in nature and
environmental education programs.The Environmental Park, Fenster Nature Park, Mary Olson
Farm, and the undeveloped West Hill Lake property all have the potential to offer programming
focused on environmental education.
6. Topics for Recreation Programs: Direction for recreation program topics are gleaned from
several sources, including the public opinion survey conducted in 2015, direct requests to the
Department, national and regional trends, and recommendations by staff members,the Park&
Recreation Board and the Arts Commission.The survey is an especially rich source of ideas for
activities, both for learning what recreation activities residents are currently participating in and
what activities they would like to see offered by the City of Auburn Parks, Arts& Recreation
Department.The Recreation Needs Assessment should be reviewed periodically to generate
new strategies for recreation programming.
ORD.E Page 474 of 751
Athletic Programs
The Auburn Parks,Arts & Recreation Department organizes various seasonal sport leagues for adults,
teens, kids and families as well as opportunities for drop-in programs.Additionally the City maintains
general outdoor recreation facilities including trails,tennis courts, basketball courts, bocce courts, disc
golf,skate parks, and a municipal golf course.
Many area residents participate in the athletic programs sponsored by the City's Parks,Arts&
Recreation Department. In 2014, approximately 4,500 youth and adults participated in these programs,
a decrease of approximately 15 percent since 2004.With the addition of a gymnasium in 2011,
opportunities for drop-in play have been added; with over 4,000 individuals taking advantage of that
option. Drop-in play is suited for those with flexible schedules; rather than more structured schedules as
is seen with organized leagues. Several explanations can be given for the decreasing recreation rate for
organized athletic programs, with the most common factor being there are a variety of options available
to residents to meet their recreational, health, and fitness needs other than organized athletics.
Additionally, many people have a perception of less leisure time in their lives today.
Residents have the opportunity to become involved in many sports activities, and can participate as an
individual, or as part of an organized team or league. Programs are provided for both youth and adults,
and are further divided into coed programs, and all male and all female programs.
Survey results show that 51%of the city's population would like Parks,Arts& Recreation Department to
offer outdoor sport options and 40%would like indoor sport opportunities.
Adult Athletics:Adult athletic programs revolve primarily around the sports of softball, basketball,
volleyball and flag football.With the addition of a new Gymnasium in 2011, dodgeball and futsal (indoor
soccer) have been added as options for adult athletics. Soccer plays a smaller role in Department
offerings,as there are many outside leagues that offer soccer. Since the opening of the Gymnasium in
2011,open gym volleyball, pickleball, and basketball programs are averaging over 4,000 drop-in players
annually. Programs such as flag football and basketball still attract primarily men, although they are
open to all players.There is a growing trend of people doing more family centered activities and other
individual sports and activities. Adult athletic program offerings should be directed at meeting the needs
of individuals and families.
Youth Sports- Youth sports programs are offered for children from age 3 to 18 and vary seasonally.The
main focus is on recreation,team work, learning and fun rather than high-level competition. Preschool
sports,through a "Let's Play Sports" program are hugely popular and require parent participation.They
help lead children to playing in additional sport programs offered by the Department. Youth sport
ORD.E Page 475 of 751
programming has diversified beyond soccer, baseball and fastpitch and the Department now also offers
cross country, girl's volleyball,track&field,flag football, climbing, dodgeball and a select basketball
league to give children a larger pool of athletic activities in which to participate.
Specialized Recreation Athletics:The department offers both a sports and Unified Sports program in the
sports of Basketball,Volleyball, Roller-skating, Bowling, Soccer,Track& Field, Cycling, Swimming and
Softball. In Unified Sports Programs, athletes and partners,those with and without developmental
disabilities, participate on teams together. Cooperative efforts with the Auburn High School staff has
resulted in partnered social programs. Programs partnered with the Community Lab at the AHS has
produced mentorship and life skills programs.With two wheelchair accessible buses,the department is
able to transport participants to and from events and programs.
Athletic Programs Needs/Recommendations
1. Continue/Expand family sport programming
2. Expand individual oriented athletic options—running,walking club
3. Flexible scheduling for drop-in programs
4. Track sport trends and interests such as Ultimate, pickleball, disc golf, lacrosse, rugby, bocce
5. Increase Participation by Women and Girls: Continue to expand the co-ed,women's and girls
programs as new recreation facilities are provided. Investigate ways to inform more women of
the women's athletic programs.
6. Partnerships: Continue to partner with schools and other providers to increase program
offerings and participation. Coordinate with the local school district to maximize use of current
facilities.
7. Offer Programs in New Sports: Experiment with offering athletic programs/classes in new or
developing sports such as,disc golf,futsal, mountain-biking,foot golf, bike courses. Place an
emphasis on family and individual oriented programs.
8. Gymnasium Space: City-owned and scheduled gymnasium space is needed to maintain the
current course offerings. An increase in gymnasium space is needed if these very popular
programs are to be expanded to keep up with the community's growing population.
ORD.E Page 476 of 751
Leisure and Educational Programs
A wide range of recreation programs, including instruction in arts and crafts, dance, music, community
education and special events are offered through the Auburn Parks,Arts and Recreation Department.
Existing leisure and educational programming fails into various age categories: preschool;youth;teens;
adults; seniors; individuals with specialized needs; and families. Programs fluctuate based on community
interest,seasons,availability of instructors and facilities.
Survey Results
Although the City provides programs for all ages and categories;the public opinion survey is useful in
determining the likelihood of use in each area by residents.The survey asked respondents what
recreation programs by age groups should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others)that members
of their household would utilize.Their combined highest and moderate likelihood of use was as follows
(Question#12):
• Adults—68.03%
� Teens(middle& high school)—65.77%
• Elementary school youth—41.29%
• Seniors (at or near retirement)—40.89%
• Toddlers/preschoolers—27.44%
• Developmentally Disabled (all other ages)—12.84%
• Developmentally Disabled (school age)—12.34%
Preschool Programs,Ages 1-5: Preschool programs provide classes in movement, crafts, sports,and
innovative holiday activities.The availability of facilities affects which classes are offered.With the
opening of a new gymnasium in 2011, a new Indoor Playground program was initiated that allows
parents to bring their preschool aged child for socialization and fun! The department provides
balls, games, mats, riding toys, climbing toys and more in the Les Gove Gymnasium.
Approximately 3,000 registrations occur on an annual basis. Most preschool classes are offered at Les
Gove Park's Multi-purpose Building, as are many other events.This is inconvenient for preschool
programs, because the room, supplies and materials must be continually set up and taken down, in
order not to interfere with other uses. Movement classes such as ballet and gymnastics are held at
buildings that are not well-suited to these activities, as they do not provide the mirrors, bars,and other
equipment or settings needed for effective learning.The opening of a new Community Center in 2016
should help to alleviate these current challenges.
Youth Programs,Ages 5-10: Youth programs consist of arts and crafts,gymnastics,dance,sports,
acting, music, science,and social and personal skills. Summer activities include a variety of day camps,
sport camps and specialty camps. Most recreation programs are currently directed toward youth 10
years old and under.
ORD.E Page 477 of 751
Leisure & Education Program—Preschool/Youth Needs & Recommendations:
1. Design and add a mobile recreation bus with activities that can be taken into the community for
the introduction of recreation activities to school-age children.
2. Work with the Auburn School District to introduce school-based before and/or after school
recreation activities to encourage activity and healthy habits in youth.
3. Expand multi-generational programming and Family Programming;
Tweens/Teens,Ages 11-19: Like communities around the country,Auburn is struggling with concerns
for its young people and the challenges they face today. The City employs two positions focused on
teen programming.These staff members have worked over the last 20 years to engage teens in
recreation programs, provide information and marketing materials specifically geared for teens about
program and service opportunities;and developed relevant and diverse opportunities for young people.
An evaluation of the existing athletic and recreation programs reveals that 11 to 15 year-olds participate
primarily in the athletic programs offered by the City; however a popular Teen Late Night program; and
several Middle School programs have given teens greater opportunities.Additionally,the Department
coordinates the Auburn Youth Council which provides teen leadership and server/earning opportunities.
The Youth Council meets on a regular basis to plan service projects and fundraising events. Another
factor to consider in planning for teens is the large number of low-income families in Auburn. Nearly half
of Auburn residents fall into the low or very low income categories, making it difficult for many families
to pay for recreational activities for teens who are able to care for themselves during out-of-school time.
Providing facilities and programs with a positive social or recreational environment is seen as key to
counteracting some of the negative behaviors and activities occurring when teens"just hang out." With
the increasing options for social media;the department needs to be creative about engaging
tweens/teens in programming options. Developing appealing programs for this age group may need to
involve teens and be more creative in approach than for other ages.The City is currently repurposing
the current Parks,Arts& Recreation Administration Building into a Teen Center and programming for
Teens will increase in June 2016.
Leisure & Education Program—Teen Program Needs & Recommendations:
1. Improve Facilities: Improve existing facilities and develop additional facilities to provide a variety
of recreational,cultural and artistic opportunities for teens in the community. Develop methods
to evaluate recreation facilities and establish standards and criteria to improve existing facilities.
2. Assess Needs and Interests of Teens: Assess the recreational,cultural and artistic needs and
interests of teens in the community on an ongoing basis. Use a youth specific evaluation tool
for activities, programs and classes in order to meet the many varied needs and interests of
teens today.This may mean offering"non-traditional" activities not available at schools.
3. Accessibility to Programs: A Fee Waiver Program allows many low-income residents to attend
recreation classes and programs.While the Fee Waiver Program helps, more flexibility may be
ORD.E Page 478 of 751
needed for families in need who don't meet the United States Department of Agriculture Child
Nutrition Program Income guidelines. Consideration for providing more youth and teen oriented
programs at low or no cost encourages greater participation. Improved public transportation
and an improved pedestrian/bicycle network will enable more teens to attend activities. Further
develop partnerships with the local school district to expand transportation opportunities to and
from programs.
4. Teen Center Programming: A variety of low to no cost drop-in programs and structured fee
based programs will be provided. Provide middle school and high school specific programs.
5. Expand Sports Programs: Increase and expand sports programs for teens by developing an
intramural sports program to encourage greater participation.
6. Outreach to "At Risk"Teens: Perform outreach activities connecting"at risk"teens to
recreational programs.This will establish a connection to the community.
7. Creative Marketing: Current trends will continually be assessed to maintain relevant marketing.
Adult Programs: All adult programs are available to persons 18 and over; some are available to those
14 years and over.Adult recreation offerings include classes and workshops. Instructors are selected
based on their qualifications, and local interest in the programs they offer.Staff and student evaluations
of instructors and courses help to maintain high quality course offerings. Most adult programs are held
at the Senior Activity Center,the Parks, Arts and Recreation Administration Building,the Multi-purpose
Building in Les Gove Park and School District buildings when necessary/available. However,senior
programs have first priority at the Senior Activity Center,which limits the availability of this facility and
the number of adult programs that can be offered during the day. 68%of the survey respondents noted
that adult recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (Question 12);the highest percentage of
responses within that question.
Leisure & Education Program—Adult Programs Needs& Recommendations:
1. Facility Space:The Community Center opening in 2016 will offer the opportunity for expansion
of adult programming. Additionally,adult programming will be offered in neighborhood venues.
2. Programming: Survey results, as well as opinions expressed to Parks and Recreation staff,
indicate a larger selection of community education programs is desired. By keeping abreast of
emerging recreational trends and areas of public interest,the Parks,Arts and Recreation
Department can continue its tradition of offering a series of broad ranging and well-received
classes and programs. By tracking trends and identifying areas of interest, program deficiencies
can be identified and corrected.
3. Course Evaluation: Course offerings should continue to be reviewed on a regular basis to
evaluate the instructor's performance and suitability of the facility and program. Enrollment,
opinion surveys and other means should continue to be used for evaluation purposes.
ORD.E Page 479 of 751
Senior Programs: Comprehensive programming for ages-50 and over focuses in Recreation and
Leisure includes a wide spectrum of programs, and achieve this involving both staff and participants in
decision-making.One of the big challenges of programming for this population is the wide span of ages-
from 50 to 95+.The difference in interests,abilities and needs shifts dramatically in this forty plus year
range.A diverse offering is provided including but not limited to trips and tours; exercise and fitness;
Silver Sneakers—Heathway Membership;outdoor adventure; hiking;volleyball; pickle ball; Wii bowling
league; in house social events such as movies and parties, games, cards, billiards, puzzles, computer lab.
Classes and programs change monthly, but often include arts and crafts,academic classes, computer,
dance and fitness classes.Topics are as varied as AARP Divers Safety,oil painting and consumer interest.
Several support services are also offered for seniors, including classes on Social Security,wills, health
insurance,tax counseling.Volunteers are provided through SHIBA(Senior Health Insurance Benefit Act)
program to help seniors resolve questions about Medicare/Medicaid and seniors' rights.
Leisure & Education Program—Senior Programs Needs & Recommendations:
1. Marketing:The ability to better market senior programs is integral to reaching more people.
Young retirees may feel they are too young for the Center, creating one type of marketing
challenge. On the other hand, communicating with the frailer, home-bound elderly must be
accomplished with a different approach.The Center's many different programs and services are
suitable for people of many different ages and interests.Additional funding for effective
marketing to promote and inform residents of the Senior Center's offerings is necessary to move
beyond current participation levels.
2. Program Changes:Types of programs offered have changed as the interest of todays 50 plus has
changed. We have seen a large increase in numbers participating in outdoor adventures,
extended travel,cultural offerings and fitness. We need to continue to look beyond the next
few years to address the changing needs of our aging population.We now see more instances of
delayed retirement age, increased lifespan, diversity in interests, diversity in financial resources,
and in cultural diversity.To meet these and other new demands,an analysis of both service
planning and facility plans for the next 10 to 20 years should be undertaken. Expanded services
in the areas of wellness,exercise and support services must be explored. Counseling and mental
health services as well as expanded medical services must be considered. We are seeing an
increased number of inentally ill older adults in our programs.Transportation of seniors to
Senior Center programs should be considered in future Senior Center planning, as should
outreach services for the frail elderly and expanded adult day care services. Meeting the needs
of minority elders in our growing ethnically diverse population must also be a focus. The
possibility of more off-site programming and/or expansion of existing facility would also be
useful, as is exploring the Senior Center's role in city-wide human services discussions and senior
housing projects.
3. Staff: With the projected changes in the aging population and social service needs mentioned as
well as the projected need to increase rental revenues,there will be a corresponding need for
additional staff.
ORD.E Page 480 of 751
Specialized Recreation: The Parks,Arts and Recreation Department offers social, educational and
athletic opportunities for youth,teens, adults and seniors with special needs.A calendar of events
published every three months, lists classes, sports and activities offered. The Young Generation Club is a
program designed to meet the social and recreational needs for developmentally and physically disabled
persons,ages 18 and up. Inclusionary and unified sports programs offer opportunities for individuals
both with and without disabilities to participate together.The focus is on similar abilities, not
differences. Emphasis is on providing understanding, disability awareness, building active participation
for all people and involving families. It would be a goal to implement additional programs that focus on
collaboration,which embrace diversity,where people with and without disabilities live, learn and play
together.
Specialized Recreation Programs Needs & Recommendations:
1. Children with Special Needs: Continued growth in inclusionary programs for children under 12
are encouraged. Although the schools have a good educational program for the
developmentally disabled,there are few social or recreational outlets available for these
children, with the exception of athletic events such as the Special Olympics, which are open to
children age 8 and above.
2. Transportation:Transportation to programs is an ongoing challenge for many people in this
population. Few participants are able to drive or own a car,thus public transportation becomes
vital. Recreational classes are held at various locations throughout the community.These
programs occur primarily in the evenings and on weekends, when bus service is at its lowest
level. Increased ACCESS Metro service and City of Auburn wheelchair-accessible buses have
helped. Improved bus service, wheelchair-accessible vehicles, and pedestrian and bike facilities
are essential to serving this group of users. Ongoing input should be provided to the
transportation planning process,to improve service to these locations.
3. Program Costs: Financially,this group has extremely(imited resources.The scholarship and fee
waiver program is necessary for many of these residents to be able to participate. Maintaining ,
the scholarship and fee waiver program and offering programs for children are priorities for this
population.
4. Staffing:This population may require a higher staff to participant ratio in programs due to
special needs. Additional staff training may be required.
5. Program Growth: Expansion of new and existing programming for specific specialized recreation
programs as well as inclusion and unified programs.
Health & Wellness Programs
A wide range of health and wellness programs, including fitness classes, nutrition programs,cooking
classes,community gardening, and a seasonal Farmers Market are offered through the Auburn Parks,
ORD.E Page 481 of 751
Arts and Recreation Department. Existing health and wellness programming crosses all age categories
and is often offered to families. Programs fluctuate based on community interest,seasons, availability of
instructors and facilities.
A recent Health Impact Assessment was conducted by Studio 3MW as a baseline for the City's
Comprehensive Planning efforts.The baseline assessment for the Auburn HIA studied the following
determinants of health: population health outcomes, urban form,the public realm (parks, open spaces,
public places and streets) physical activity and the food environment. Understanding how these
determinants of health influence community members' ability to make healthy choices helped to
identify needs and opportunities for City actions to improve access to healthy living resources.
Key findings of the Health Impact Assessment suggest that community health outcomes could be
improved through the following types of interventions:eliminating natural and man-made mobility
barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists,improving sidewalk connectivity, improving the pedestrian
environment, increasing the number of mixed use areas that provide goods and services, improving transit
access, increasing the number of destinations located within walking distance of homes, increasing the
number of healthy food sources within walking distance of homes and schools, improving safety and
perceptions of safety,and eliminating affordability as a barrier to healthy food and physical activity.
Key community and geographic features contribute to urban form, mobility and access to goods and
services. Geographic districts within the City include:The Auburn valley floor districts (North Auburn,
South Auburn & Downtown) and hill districts(West Hill, Lea Hill, Lakeland,Southeast Auburn).Auburn
includes over 30 square miles in land area,views of rivers,wooded hillsides, natural areas and Mount
Rainier,annexed hill areas developed to County standards without sidewalks and few connecting streets.
These features form barriers to connectivity and physical activity and create isolated districts within the
City.
Auburn is a diverse community in many ways.The City's median age is 33.5, more than ten percent
younger than the State average.Approximately 30 percent of residents identify as a race or ethnicity
other than white or Caucasian. Of these residents, approximately ten percent are Asian and Pacific
Islander,five percent are African American,two percent are American Indian and Alaskan Native,and
five percent are another race or ethnicity.Thirteen percent of residents identify as Hispanic or Latino.
One quarter of residents speak a language other than English at home.
A higher proportion of Auburn individuals and families face financial hardship compared to those in King
County and Washington State.Auburn's median income is$54,329, about 24 percent lower than the
King County median, and nine percent lower than the State median.The unemployment rate in Auburn
is over ten percent.Approximately fifteen percent of Auburn families live on incomes below the federal
poverty level. Over half of the students in the Auburn School District are eligible for free or reduced
lunch.
Low-income and minority populations are generally at greater risk of poor health status and poor access
to healthy living resources.These population groups make up a significant portion of Auburn's
community; however,they are not uniformly distributed throughout the community.
Auburn has relatively poor community health outcomes. Compared to other cities in King County, it has
the lowest life expectancy, highest rate of diabetes, one of the highest rates of obesity,and one of the
highest rates of inactivity.The health outcomes of students in the Auburn School District are generally
ORD.E Page 482 of 751
consistent with King County averages, but could be improved to reduce the risk of students developing
chronic diseases as adults. Improving community health is an important issue for the City and one that
can be aided by offering health and wellness programs by the City of Auburn Parks,Arts& Recreation
Department.
According to survey results,there is a higher interest level among residents for offering general fitness,
health and wellness programs (64%)than outdoor sport leagues (51%)or indoor sport leagues(41%).
The City of Auburn coordinates a 17-week Auburn International Farmers Market every Sunday from June
through September.The season features over 40 vendors each week who offer a variety of fresh locally
grown farm-based foods,flowers, hand crafted items and concession stands that feature home-cooked
tastes.The weekly market also included free community performances and several educational sessions
on health, nutrition, and gardening.
The City of Auburn Parks,Arts& Recreation Department operates three community gardens for lease
and use by residents. Community Gardens are used for recreational gardening and for growing
vegetables and flowers for family use.The popularity of the gardens continues to grow and spots are
sold out each year.
Health and wellness activities and services are a major focus for senior programs.A variety of health
agencies provides periodic health assessments,foot care,flu shots, blood pressure ciinics,therapeutic
massage, dental cleaning and medical information and referrals specifically for seniors at the Auburn
Senior Activity Center. An onsite weekday lunch program is operated and managed in partnership with
Catholic Community Services and Aging and Disability Services.All meals meet one-third recommended
daily allowance for persons 60 years of age and older. A salad bar is added to the meal provided by
funds and product from the City of Auburn Human Services, sponsorships and participant donations.The
Senior Activity Center also partners with Senior Services of Seattle King County to provide frozen Meals
on Wheels to homebound seniors unable to prepare their own meals. Volunteers work with staff to ad
mister the program and delivery of ineals on a weekly basis.A variety of nutrition education materials
and lectures are routinely provided at the Center and a volunteer"Wellness Team" assists staff in
coordinating projects and activities specifically related to health and wellness for seniors. Center
volunteers also work to provide a monthly food pantry for which groceries are purchased in bulk, re-
packaged by volunteers and the savings are passed on to customers.
Health &Wellness— Needs & Recommendations:
1. Expand Offerings for Health and Wellness Programs:
a. Neighborhood Based Programs-Provide health and wellness programs that are both
traditional and innovative. Examples: Neighborhood free program sites, bring recreation
to the community. Examples: Park Spotlight Series offering different activities while
introducing the community to active recreation in their own local parks.
b. Community Center Based Programs- Provide multigenerational fitness classes
ORD.E Page 483 of 751
2. Healthy Cooking—Provide classes and demonstrations that reflect the diversity of our
community.
3. Farmers Market—Ensure access to healthy,fresh foods from local farms.
4. Expand Outdoor Fitness Equipment Options in Parks
S. Expand Community Gardens with an emphasis on low income neighborhoods
6. Expand Outdoor Recreation opportunities.
7. Partner with local health agencies to be a provider of preventive care and rehabilitation
ORD.E Page 484 of 751
Heritage and Preservation Programs
The City of Auburn has several sites designated as historic City Landmarks:the 1924 Auburn Masonic
Temple at 302-310 E. Main Street;the 1937Auburn Post at 20 Auburn Avenue NE;the 1914 Auburn
Public Library at 306 Auburn Avenue NE; and the 1879 Mary Olson Farm at 28728 Green River Road.
Preservation efforts and identifying historic sites in need of landmark status can be strengthened by
communication between the Museum and the Planning Department. By partnering between these City
departments and staff, and by including key community groups a stronger heritage and cultural
community can be built.The Museum can become a strong partner in helping establish landmark status
for appropriate City properties, identifying and prioritizing preservation activities,and locating grant
resources.
Mary Olson Farm: A Unique Landmark
In 1994 the City acquired the historic Mary Olson Farm which is recognized as a King County and City of
Auburn Landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.The Mary Olson Farm dates
from the 1880s, and vividly portrays a working farm of the early 1900s. The 67 acre farm includes seven
historic wooden buildings, a salmon bearing stream,a 100+year old orchard,forested hillsides not
logged since the late 1800s, and acres of ineadows in hay production.
After years of restoration efforts and an over two million dollar fund raising effort,the Farm opened to
the public in 2011. Now fully restored,the Mary Olson Farm is operated as a limited use City Park—
cooperatively managed by the City of Auburn and the White River Valley Historical Society. In 2011 the
Farm won the prestigious Historic Seattle's Best Preservation Award. In 2013 the Farm was named King
Conservation Wildlife Protection Farm of the Year.
To date roughly 18,000 school children have toured the Farm on curriculum based fieldtrips where they
learn where their food comes from and about stream ecology. The site offers opportunities for living
history programs,the study of nature and the environment, arts performances,classes, and passive ,
recreation.A caretaker is located on site, helping to maintain the landscape and care for the resident
livestock.
Mary Olson Farm Operations
The built environment of the Mary Olson Farm is leased to the White River Valley Historical Society for
the purpose of economic restoration of the buildings and landscape, and for programing purposes.The
City of Auburn still maintains ownership and the Farm operates as a City of Auburn Park.
Programming at the Farm includes elementary school tours where students study where their food
comes from.They visit stations and participate in hands-on activities such as digging up potatoes,
making cider,feeding chickens and petting a cow. Later in the fall busloads of middle school students
visit the Farm where they study stream ecology and salmon.Their visits are timed to coincide with the
indigenous runs of salmon spawning in Olson Stream.
ORD.E Page 485 of 751
During the summer months the Farm is open for drop-in visits for picnics and walks.A staff person and
the caretaker are on hand to give tours, bring the livestock out to visit the public and maintain the Farm.
Several special events have become a tradition. Hops& Crops Music and Beer Festival occurs each
September drawing over 900 visitors to sample craft brews and listen to regional musicians. Each year
the Auburn Symphony Orchestra uses the site for a series of chamber music concerts. Summer camps
keep many young people active and learning while experiencing old time games,food making, livestock
care and interacting with the environment.
Recommendations for the Mary Olson Farm
1. Acquiring Conservation Use of Adjacent Properties: it will be beneficial to secure use or
ownership of portions of several residential properties bordering the eastern boundary of the
Farm.These properties are steep hillsides, include the ravine through which Olson Stream flows
and are important view-shed areas key to program development and habitat restoration.
2. Continuing Habitat Restoration:Continued restoration of the natural habitat of the Farm is
essential. Several work parties or contracted efforts each year are required to keep blackberry
and ivy from infiltrating these 67 acres.Annual handwork should be scheduled to continue
caring for the stream buffer area, keeping it free of invasive species and planting diverse native
shrubs and trees.
3. Increasing Maintenance Budget for Historic Site&Buildings:The seven historic buildings,
gravel walkways, historic orchard and many other unique qualities of the Farm require sensitive
and ongoing maintenance. Cedar shake roofs need gentle cleaning every few years,gravel needs
to be hand spread in walkways,and a certified orchardist needs to prune the fruit trees two
times a year...There are many tasks of this nature at the Farm that are far beyond routine parks
maintenance and need to be budgeted for accordingly.
4. Staffing: Should expansion of programs and event are to occur at the Mary Olson Farm it has to
be recognized that additional staffing would be necessary to meet these needs.As educational
programs and events increase,the staff hours to meet this need will need to be increased.
Consideration should be given to increasing the current arrangement of providing the
"Caretakers", "free rent"with one where the "caretaker"would also receive a monetary stipend
as well.
White River Valley Museum
ORD.E Page 486 of 751
The White River Valley Museum is governed by a private/public partnership agreement between the
White River Valley Historical Society and the City of Auburn.This partnership is the result of an extensive
planning period (1990-1992) between the City and the Historical Society.The City of Auburn provides
the salary for a fulltime Museum Director, a fulltime Curator of Education a .75 FTE Education Assistant
and a .5 FTE Curator of Collections, In addition the City of Auburn provides some financial programming
support as well as in-kind services such as printing and mailings.
The Museum serves as a community educational institution teaching children and adults about the arts
and heritage of the White River Valley. In addition to exhibits,the facility houses an extensive research
archive,and manages the caretaking of thousands of precious artifacts which represent the history of
Auburn.
The Board of Directors is the governing body of the Museum.The 17 member board consists of eight
members appointed by the City of Auburn and nine members elected by the Historical Society.
Over the course of this partnership the Museum has experienced tremendous growth. Using privately
raised funds the building has been fully renovated to accommodate professional permanent exhibits,a
rotating exhibit gallery, gift shop and extensive collections storage space.Three temporary exhibits a
year are created onsite and draw critical acclaim from members of the profession, arts critics and
patrons alike. Complementing lectures,workshops and films are offered throughout the year. Creative
programs are filled by a following audience that enjoys children's Overnight at the Museum,Junior
Curator Camp, Hooked on History open houses and Late Play Dates. Each spring several thousand
elementary age students tour the Museum on curriculum based fieldtrips.
In the future the Museum may undergo some facility and program changes to better connect it to the
energy of the Park and the neighboring facilities.
Recommendations for the Museum
1. Accommodating Continued Growth of Educational Programs: Museum programs are growing
to meet the needs of the Auburn community and Auburn School District.All kindergarten and
third grade Auburn School District students tour the Museum as part of their curriculum—an
arrangement that is very rare in the State. Fieldtrip programs require a lot of staff and volunteer
time.School programs are so strong that they will soon outstrip our ability and space.To that
end fieldtrips will be streamlined, and grow into activities that do not require so many or such
highly trained volunteers. Museum operations will need to depend more upon online
registration and feedback.Consideration should be given to renovating the garage space into a I
classroom. Upon completion of this renovation, the Museum staff would be able to handle
larger groups of students at one time.
2. Increasing Visibility;The most difficult aspect of successful operation of the White River Valley
Museum has always been its lack of visibility.After years of working on this problem and
successfully obtaining good signage, advertising and branding,the next step is to improve the
exterior of the Museum to better attract visitors who are already at the park, library, senior
ORD.E Page 487 of 751
center,gym and the new community center. Consideration of rebuilding the Museum lobby,
increasing signage and walkways, and developing the garage space into a classroom should be
considered as methods to increase visibility. The Museum must also be an intragal part of the
rebranding of Les Gove Park as part of the "Les Gove Park Master Plan" many items in the plan
such as an outdoor plaza that could also serve as a gathering place for education and
performance,the extension of"H Street" as well as the redevelopment of the shared City of
Auburn and King County Library parking area can greatly benefit the Museum.
3. Staffing:After 2008 reductions in staff the Collections department at the Museum was
decreased by 10 hours per week. This reduction remains in place today. . It is recommended
that additional staff hours be allocated to the Curator of Collections position so that the
professional,timely maintenance of the artifact collection remain.
ORD.E Page 488 of 751
Cultural Programs: Arts and Events
A wide range of arts programming and major city-wide special events are offered through the Arts and
Events division within the Parks,Arts and Recreation Department. The main program areas include:
Special Events, Performing Art,Visual Art, Public and Community Art and Literary Arts.
Special events and arts programming typically rate high in public opinion surveys, both City-wide surveys
and individual Department surveys. For the most recent Parks & Recreation Open Space Survey,when
respondents were asked what recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (either by the City or by
others)that members of their household would utilize, over 77%would participate in festivals or events
(combining high and moderate likelihood of use-Question#11). Similarly 51%would participate in
performing arts(dance, music, theater, etc) and 43%in visual arts programming.
The Arts& Events division seeks to foster cultural growth and enrichment within the community while
sponsoring programs representative of the arts spectrum and provide special events and programs that
help create community. In recognition that the arts and event contribute enormously to Auburn's
quality of life and foster economic growth,the division strives for excellence, diversity, and vitality in its
programming,while broadening the availability and appreciation of the arts.
The City of Auburn also supports an Arts Commission,founded in 1985.The commission is made up of
12 members from the community,appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council.The
commission meets on a monthly basis and is provided a report from staff,and also meets to make
recommendations on the Arts Granting program (regranting via 4Culture Sustained Support Funding) as
well as selections on Public and Visual Arts displays and commissions.
Special Events:The department has had a long history of hosting large-scale community events.
Connecting these events to the overall mission and vision of the City and the department is vital.
Auburn's community events range in size,theme,and audience. Large-scale community events
regularly see over 15,000 individuals in attendance at a single event and have been repeatedly
recognized in citizen surveys as very important to the quality of life in Auburn. Current community-wide
special events include Petpalooza, KidsDay,4t"ofJuly Festival,Veterans Day Parade and Santa Parade.
Auburn also hosts a variety of special events annually that are coordinated by outside entities. Each
event serves a unique role and adds to the spirit of our City.These community festivals,athletic, and
cultural events provide opportunities for neighbors,artists, merchants, spectators, and participants to
interact and celebrate the richness of Auburn.A new special event ordinance and permitting process
was established in 2015 to streamline the event permitting process for outside agencies to coordinate
and produce events within the City of Auburn. It impacts those events that impact the ordinary use of
public streets, right-of-ways,trails, parks or sidewalks and/or may require additional city services than
would normally be provided such as police escorts,traffic control,sanitation, and cleanup work required
to support the event.
Program Needs/Recommendations
1. Continue to streamline the special event permit process to support community groups
presenting their own events without impacting city staff, city equipment and city services. ��
ORD.E Page 489 of 751
2. Further staff collaboration and coordination of events to support outreach and promotion of
other city services and programs.
3. In order to grow special events or add new events, staffing would need to increase. Current
levels of staffing are at maximum capacity to execute and coordinate existing events.
Performing Arts: Performing Arts is a highly visible and central program to the Arts and Events division.
Offering a wide range of programming,the performing arts spans from free summer concerts,
professional ticketed performances at the Auburn Performing Arts Center, and managing all aspects of
the Auburn Avenue Theater.
Program Needs/Recommendations
1. A full facility assessment of the Auburn Avenue Theater needs to be conducted,as the City is
in year 7 of a 15 year lease of the building and a plan will need to be created in order to
dictate next steps for the Theater and/or performing arts offerings.
2. The ability to offer concessions is an important factor in the patrons experience at ticketed
performing arts opportunities. A reliable method of working with community non-profit
agencies to secure the appropriate permits needs to be further explored and systematized.
The creation of a Parks Foundation non-profit agency could potentially serve this need.
3. The largest growth program area has been in the production of plays and musical, in the
Auburn Community Players as well as the youth and teen theater productions.These
programs are incredibly space intensive and the growth/continuation needs to take into
consideration additional facility space for practice,set-building, and being able to continue
to offer rentals and programming while the cast is rehearsing.
4. While the Auburn Avenue Theater is leased, it is under the City's management.The outside
of the building needs to reflect and represent the quality of entertainment that is occurring
within. A fa�ade improvement is needed to improve the street appearance of the building.
5. The Auburn Avenue Theater is also a great community resource, providing a venue for
which community groups can rent and use for their events, presentations, conferences,etc.
Streamlining the rental process would increase exposure to the theater as well as bring in
additional revenues.
6. Continue to gather information and audience needs and have it input into the programming
decisions that are made and what kinds of programming is offered.
Visual Art:The city curates two visual art galleries, on in the lobby of Auburn's City Hall and one in
Auburn's Senior Center. Local and regional artists apply once a year for the display of their artwork
within these spaces. The artists display their artwork for exposure and do not receive an honorarium for
their time and effort. The City creates a flyer and promotional materials to be able to support the
artists.
Program Needs/Recommendations
1. Research and explore offering an honorarium/fee to participating artists. Many municipal art
programs are beginning to offer this as a way to support artists and the costs associated with
displaying artwork (travel,framing needs, etc.)
2. Staff receives regular requests for artwork to be placed in offices and public areas. A potential
new portable works program should be explored. This would involve the purchase of two
dimensional artwork within through our Public Art selection process, and be potentially
connected to a purchase award from the artists that participate in the gallery program.
ORD.E Page 490 of 751
Public and Community Art:The Public Art program was created in 1988 includes commissioned artwork
and sculptures that have been created and placed in the public domain,outside and accessible to all.
The Pu.blic Art collection inaludes over 25 artworks and is throughout the City mainly in public parks.
The Public Art program is financially supported by a 1%a for art program, in which 1%of City Capital
Project Construction goes to the creation of a new artwork. Additionally,an annual$30,000 is allotted
for the creation of new work. Community Art are projects that include community participation with
the creation of public art, including temporary artwork displays,group-painted murals,and other
projects such as utility boxes. Pianos on Parade, Benchmarks,Streetsaapes(artwork within vacant -.
storefronts)are examples of Auburn's Community Art programs.
Program Needs/Recommendations
1. 'The current iteration of the percent for art resolution was last revised in 2008. It is
recommended that the language of the resolution isdiscussed with Mayor and Council
specifically the language that eiccludes streets and utility projects from the requirement.
2. Maintenance and restoration of th.is aging collection is an increasing need;and re.storation work
regularly exceeds the annual budget allotment. The public art collection has.annual
maintenance program to ensure the longevity of the artwork, but explorafion of a reliable
funding source in which more comprehensive restoration could be completed is needed. The
Cify maint:ains an in.surance poliey in which the artwork is covered in case of vandalism/theft
with a deductible of$5,000,
3. Providing a method for which private developers are encouraged and incentivized to include
public art within new or renovated construction projects could be a great benefit to the public
spaces and built environment"s that are changing rapidly. An exploration of collaboration
between Planning and Arts division to be able tq advise new developments as well as have the
process be responsive to timeline as well as a review process through the Arts Commission.
4. Downtown Sculpture Gallery is an artwork on loan program that places sculptures on City built
pedestals for a one-year timeframe. The continuation of building new pedestals with new
downtown core developments is recommended.and will ensu�e the vibrancy of the program a.nd
have artwork throughout the downtown core.
5. The space needs for Pianos on Parade and Benchmarks is significant,and the materials are
stored for the majority of the year.
6. The community participation of these types of programs makes the use of social media ideal for
continued community participation. Working with the City's marketing director,create
marketing plans that include social media contests; hashtags and tagging as part of the signage
to increase exposure and online participation:
Literary Arts: In 2011 the position of Poet Laureate was established to recognize and honor a citizen
poet of exceptional talent and accomplishment.The Poet Laureate also encou�ages appreciation of
poetry and literary life in Auburn.The position is a three-year term and works with staff to offer
programming and events throughout their term.
Program Needs/Recommendations
1. Expand Literary Arts opportunities in Auburn; including book readings, poetry readings, and
writing classes.
ORD.E Page 491 of 751
ORD.E Page 492 of 751
- - �
_ _ _ �
�
ORD.E Page 493 of 751
Chapter 7
Open Space
Introduction
Communities use the term "open space" differently as the natural and built enyironments
differ so widely from place to place; In Auburn we define open space as land largely
undeveloped, which has been left in a natural, near natural or natural appearing condition.
Open space includes both public and privately owned land.
The Growth Management Act of 1991 (GMA) recommends that cities and counties develop
park and recreation elements which complement the expected land development pattern of
the community (RCW 36.70A.070(8)). The GMA also requires us to "identify open space
corridors within and between urban growth areas. They shall include Iands useful for
recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connection of critical areas" (RCW 36JOA:160}. This
plan is intended to meet the requirements of the GMA, and to ensure that green spaces in
Auburn are preserved to the maximum extent possible.
Why We Need Open Space
The majority of the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan is devoted to determining how we
can best serve our human constituents. The Open Space component of the Plan is different,
however. In addition to benefiting people, open space is valuable to wildlife and to maintain,ing
environmental quality. The preservation of green spaces and natural areas are important in
protecting the quality of life for Auburn residents within a highly urbanized area.
Open space benefits are many and diverse. In addition to environmental advantages,
open space proyides psychological relief and opportunity for solitucie that people need on
occasion; Open space can:
• Provide phy"sical and visual buffers between urban and rural areas,and
between incompatible uses.
• Provide opportunities for passive and ac�tive outdoor tecreation.
• Preserve natural areas and environmental features with significant educational,
scientific,wildlife habitat,historic, and/or scenic values such as views of major visual
resources i.e., as Mount Rainier, riparian corridors, and vistas along scenic routes.
• Provide public access to creeks, rivers and other water bodies.
• Create distinctive settings within the city or within a neighborhood by preserving
features such as h_illsides, rivers, wetlands, scenic corridors and potential trail
corridors.
• Provide connections between developed areas and natural areas.Provide rr�e�
corridorssuitable for wildlife.
_ _
m Offer health and safety benefits such as flood control, proteetion for water supply,
cleansing of air, and separation from hazards such as landslides.
ORD.E Page 494 of 751
Goals and Policy
The goals and objectives of the Open Space Plan are focused on developing a high quality,
divecsified park and open space system that preserves and enhances significant
environmental resources and features.
�O�I 1
To acquire and manage important open spaces in the Cify of Auburn.
Objective 1.1 Coordinate planning efforts to create a system of open spaces,an acquisition
and conservation strategy,a management and maintenance program,public art and an
education component.
Objective 1.2 Pursue acquisifion and conservation of critical open space lands. Acquisition
of open space should be consistent with the site selection eriteria and conservation priorities
adopted with the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
���� L ,
To develop a Greenbelt Open Space System with an interconnecting network ofi open
space land allowing movement of people and wildlife.
Objective 2.1 Develop a system of trail corridors to link major parks and open spaces,
residential neighborhoods, and other activity centers such as schools, employment centers, and
community centers.
Objective 2.2 Explore the use of utility and transportation corridors to expand the trail
system.
���� �
A funding mechanism should be established so that open space can be acquired on a regular
basis.
Objective 3.1 Open space proposed for acquisition with public funds should be evaluated
and prioritized based on such factors as environmental sensitivity and connections to other
open space areas around the City and beyond.
ORD.E Page 495 of 751
Objective 3;2 The City seeks to acquire less-than.-fee interest (i.e. Conservation Easements)
in lands which can provide open space benefits compatible with reasonable private uses of the
remainingownership ihterest.
Policy 3:2.1 The Cify pursues agreements for public use of utility rights-of-way for
public trails as connectors between open space parcels.
Policy 3.2,2 The City should approve use of public trail rights-of-way for underground
utilities, or crossing of rights-of way, in exchange for public use of utility rights-of-way or
in return for fees dedicated to open space acquisition, maintenance or operation.
Policy 3.2,3 The City participates with other government agencies or land trusts'in joint
acquisition or land trades of regionally important open space lands.
Policy 3Z.4 The City devises methods for efficient and equitable exchanges between
land owning divisions of City government to achieve open space goals.
Policy 3.2.5 Conservation easements along river and stream corridors throughout the
City are always being considered, The program seeks continuous easemenfs across
property boundaries along these corridors.
A System of Open Spaces
To maximize the benefit of open space lands, Auburn seeks a meaningful system of open
space. An open space system that best serves the needs of people consists of a series of activity
centers, interconnected by open space corridors.
Because the central portion of Auburn is already largely developed, it will be difficult to
develop a connected open space system in this location.Therefore,the care and preservation of
individual green spaces such as parks and school grounds becomes very important. The
function of public lands as neighborhood open space should be carefully analyzed before any
changes in use or ownership are considered.
ORD,E Page 496 of 751
ORD.E Page 497 of 751
�
�
�
ORD.E Page 49$ of 751
Chapter �
AuburnTrails
Trails are a popular attraction throughout the Pacific Northwest. Our mild
climate and lo�e of outdoor activities contribute to strong support and use
of trails,particularly in urbaniied areas.
What IS a Trail?
A trail is a travel way intended for pedestrians and other usets that
excludes motorized traffic. It can be paved, and designed to support
bicyclists, rollerbladers,joggers and other users who require a hard su.rface.
Or be unpaved,to serve walkers, hikers, mountain bikers,and equestrians.
This plan will look at trails from three different viewpoints. First, are
purely recreational trails; second, are trails serving both recreational and
transportation needs; and third, are low impact trails within natural
preserves. This differentiation is useful in determining the location, type,
and quantitq of additional trails needed in the City of Auburn. For this
plan, there are three types of trails described as recreational loop trails,
linear trails and recreation/transportation trails. Table 8-1 illustrates the
existing trails preseat in Auburn.
1. Recreational Loop Trails
Short recreational trails, which are contained within a single pa�k or site,
are usually in the form of a loop. They are intended for walking, bicycling,
hiking, or skating. They may connect different activity ar.eas within a park,
provide access to natural preserves, and somefimes proVide a connection
to the immediate neighborhood. Trails may be made of a hard surfaced
material such as concrete or asphalt, or a "soft" surfaced material such as
dirt; crushed stone or bark chips. TNe adVantage of hard surfaced paths is
they can accommodate more types of users,while soft surfaced paths have
a more rustic, natural feeling. Hard surface trails are also usable in all
weather conditions.
ORD.E Page 499 of 751
Table 8-1 Existing and Future Trails in Auburn
Trails
Loop
Transport-
Inside
Linear Total ation Total
P3Ck�Tt`d1� D85C1'Ipt1011 (miles) Park �miles) MiJes
miles
A'Street.SE Trail Future trail
Auburndale Park PaYed loop path around park
0.4i
_ _ _ _. _ _ _.
BPA Treils(Future) Paths to be developed in the future
Paved loop path around Park to - - —
Green River levee. Soft surface trail
Brennan Park extends along the levee. 1.19 1.00_ _ 2.19
C Street SE Traii Ellington Rd.SW to 15`"Street SW 1.60 1.6
Paved loop path thYough pa�k and
Cameron Park loops through Lemon Tree Lane 0.33 0:33
Cedar Lanes Park Info�mai path through wooded area 035 0.25
Do ood South Future trail
Fulmer Park(Future) Loop path to be developed
Paved loop path around meadow,
play structure, ball field;. Extensive
Game Farm Park sidewalk throughout ark 2.30 1.00 3.3
Paved trail along the White RiVer
Game Farm Wilderness Park* and around the group.camp area, 125_ _. _ 1.00_
Green River Trail(Future) Paved trail along the Green RiVer
Paved 12'wide trail runs alongside
the Union Pacific railroad, from the
Interurban Treil ci 's northern tosouthern limits 4.5 4.5
Paved loop through wo.od and along
Isaac Evans Park the Green River 1.07 1.07
Pa4ed loop through wood and
Jomada Park around park 0.30 0.1
Exten"sive sidewalk patli on Lakeland
Hills Way from Evergreen Way to Lake
Lakeland Hiils Linear Ta s Parkwa 0.73 0:73
Paved loop p.ath around recreational
Lakeland Hills Park Trail fields 0.39 0:39
Lake Ta s Blvd:Trail Paved sideinralk and asphalt t�ail 1.62 1.62
Les Gove Park Trail Paved loop path around_open space 0.50 . _.___ _ _ 0.5
Mill Greek Corridor/Aubucn
Environmental Park Board Walk Trail
_. . -- ---
PaVed loop path around pond.
Mill Pond Park Treil Connects to Cakeland Hilis Trail. _ _ .__ _ 0.29__ _ _ 0.29
Both hard and wft surface traiir are
present in the park. A paved loop
Roe ner Park' ath is marked. 1.29 1.00
Rota _Park Future_ Loop.path to be deVeloped
ORD.E Page 500 of 751
- - -_. -- - -
loop - ---—_ _ ..
Transport-
Inside
Linear Total ation Total
Pa"rk/Traii � Description Pa�k �
(miles) (miles)__ �miles Miles
Shaughnessy Park(Future) Loop path to be developed
Sunset Park Paved looppath around park. 0.69 0:50 1:19
White River Trail"` Payed and soft surf_ace trail 0.86 4.5* 4:5
Williams Trail Future trail
_ __ - - -
Total 16.39 m11es 9.93 8.59 4.50
Refer to 2005 Transportation Plan
ORD.E Page 501 of 751
2. Linear Trails
Recreational trails designed to connect one area of the city or activity
center to another. They lead to a destination point and are hard
surfaced so they are usable in most weather conditions and for a variety
of activities,such as walking, bicycling,and skating.
3. Recreation/Transportation Trails
Trails designed to connect one area of the city or activity center to
another serve a dual role for both recreational and transportation uses.
Recreation/ transportation trails are generally Iinear in layout, lead to a
destination point, and are hard surfaced so they are usable in most
weather conditions and for a variety of transportation modes, such as
walking, bicycling, and skating. Sometimes called "multi- modal trails",
they are designed and constructed to stricter standards than the loop
paths, and normally accommodate two-way traffic:
Current Recreation/Transportation Trails
s Interurban
o Lakeland
o White River
The White River Trail that stretches from Game Farm Wilderness Park to
_
through Roegner ParK and ends at A Street SE includes soft surfaced trail
sections alongside the paved trail where possible. This enables riders on
mountain bikes, horseback, hikers or others who need the extra traction to
use these same trail corridors. Future trail connection with the Interurban
trail is desired to connect the southern portion of the City to a regional trail
system.
Interurban Trail -This 12' wide trail is located in the Puget Power right-of-
way and parallels the llnion Pacific Railroad for much of its length. The
Interurban Trail currently runs north to south through Tukwila, Kent,
Auburn,Algona and Pacific, and is;approximately 17 miles long.
The trail is the primary north and south route suitable for non_motorized
trayel between valley communities. The trail's location through the heart
of Auburn's'industrial di5trict brings potential users close to several of the
largest employers in the city. Boeing, GSA, the Outlet Collection, and the
Aubucn Environmental Park are also located adjacent to the trail;downtown
Auburn is less than 1/2 mile from the trail.
The Interurban Trail and the White River Trail are also designed for use by
equestrians. Informal trails in the open space areas of southeast Auburn are
also used.The shoulders of some of the rural roads are
ORD.E Page 502 of 751
used by equestrians, although these are not designed or managed for this particular use.
Lakeland Hills Trail - This trail connects the growing Lakeland
developrnent with Mill Pond and Oravetz Road. It is unique in Auburn
6ecause it passes directly through a residential neighborhood. As Lakeland
continues to grow, the trail will extend. to ensure all neighborhood
residents have easy access. Future connections will allow residents to
travel from Oraveti Road to Lake Tapps Boule�ard and Sunset Park.
Due to steep grades and narrow width, the tra.il is most appropriate for
pedestrian use only. With the cornpletion of Roegner Park and Auburn
Riverside High School, the Lakeland Hills trail has seen a dramatic increase
in use.
White River Trail - The trail, withi_n Roegner Park, falls into both
therecreational loop path and recreation/ transportation trail
categories. The trail extends east along the White River to Game Farm
Wilderness Park.
The future extension of the trail expects to increase its usefulness as a
transportation way. It will provide a much-needed east/west connector �
in the south part of Auburn for cyclists and equestrians. The proposed trail
extends west to A Street SE, and appropriate provisions will be made for
cyclists on A Street and Kersey Way, this will prove to be a very valuable Iink
in our non-motorized network and a connection to the local schools in the
area.
Do VO/e iVeed IVlore Trails?
Determining the need for trails iS more complex than it is for other
recreational facilities because of the large area they can cover and the
many different trail uses. This plan will look at survey responses from City
residents to evaluate the current demand for recreational loop paths,
Recreation/transportation trails are discussed brie.fly, but by necessity; are
more fully analyzed in the City of Auburn Transportation Plan under the.
non-motorized frail section.
Survey Results
The public opinion survey reveals tliat Auburn residents have a strong
interest in trail related activities. The survey asked several questions
concerning residents current use,wha.t kind of'trails they would most like to
see developed; what recreation activities they participate in now, and
what activities they would participate in if facilities were available: These
questions were primarily oriented toward recreational trail use.
ORD.E Page 503 of 751
Sixty-one percent of Auburn households indicated that there was a need
for walking and biking trails. Forty percent of Auburn households also
wanted non-paved trails and biking trails. The survey respondents indicated
that the residents were willing to spend $13 for every $100 to
improve/expand walking&biking trails and non-motorized veh'iele trails.
ORD.E Page 504 of 751
Current Participation in All Recreation Activities:
Activities that can be performed on trails constitute four of the top
25 activities that Auburn residents participate in.See Table 8-2.
Please note the survey activities ranked first and second are running/
walking and visiting nature areas, which are activities usually conducted
outdoors. Walking for pleasu:re is therefore the most popular outdoor
activity in the City.
Future Participation:
When asked what activities they would participate in if facilities were
available, respondents indicated running or walking and visiting nature �I
areas/wildlife were their number one and two choices. The popularity of
running and walking ranked namber one and two in the survey conducted
for the p"revious park update in 2005. The category bicycling on paved
surfaces was ranked third.
Current Trail Use:
More than 59% of respondents indicated that trails raked highest in
priority when considering recreation activities.
Need for Trails:
More than half of the respondents indicated that additional paved trails
for biking, walking and other activities are needed.
Conclusions from the Survey
Survey results support the conclusion demand for additional trails is high.
The existing trails do not provide complete coverage for the City, whether
for recreation or transportation uses. The fourteen recreational loop
paths occur in scattered locations, but with the exeeption of Les Gove Park,
the central portion of the city is not well- served. Because this is also the
most developed part of the city, it will be difficult to add trails in this area.
The Parks Department will work with the Planning Department to add
trail connec#ors as new developments are proposed, especially along the
Green and White Rivers.
Current Trail Efforts
Constructing new recreational loop paths in existing and future parks is a
viable and reasonable way of ineeting some of the demand for add_itional
walking/biking/skating facilities. Parks and other City- owned properties
that could accommodate new loop paths are:
ORD.E Page 505 of 751
Current
• Auburndale Park
_ . _
• Brannan Park
e Cameron Park
o Cedar Lanes Park
• Game Farm Park
� Game Farm Wilderness Park �
o Cedar Lanes Park
o lsaac Evans Park
• Lakeland Hill Park Park
• Les Gove Park
e Mill Pond Park
o Roegner Park
o Sunset Park
Future
• BPA trails (Lea Hill to Green River Road)
o Fulmer Park
• Rotary Park
e Green River Trail
� Shaughnessy Park
o West Hill Watershed
o Extension of Lakeland LinearTrail
Opportunities for trails are explored in all new park d:esign and
construction. Gaines Park, Cedar Lanes Park and Lakeland Hills Parks, both
small neighborhood parks, each have a short loop path of approximately
1/4 mile. Roegner Park, Game Farm Wilderness Park, and the White River
Trail ineludes two parallel trails that include a soft surfaced path suitable
for fiikers, mountain bikers and equestri.ans through part of the site, and
a paved trail fhat extends the entire length of the parR site. The trai.l
continues east, connecting with the trail in Game Farm Wilderness Perk,
and west to A Street SW, establishing this trail as an important east/west.
route for non-motorized traffic. Further connections to neighboring
residential areas to the south via sidewalks and the Lakeland Hills Trail will
_
inerease the usability of the White River Trail for students and other
users.
A master site plan is currentlybeing developed for the Future Green River
Trail.The trail is a project partly financed by the King County Open Space
Bond funding. This two phase trail is planned to follow the alignment of
the Green River from Seattle to Auburn Narrows. In Auburn it follows the.
west side of the river from the City's northern boundary to Brannan Park,
where it crosses the river into Isaac Evans Park.The trail runs along the east
side of the river, just outside ofthe existing Auburn city limits, crossing
ORD.E Page 506 of 751
back to the west side at the Fenster/Green RiverAccess,a new open space
site. The Green River Trail will be a significant new resource for local
residents. A longer term goal is to access the BPA power line and the
Williams pipe line
ORD.E Page 507 of 751
to extend the trail up into Lakeland Hills area and back down to the
Valley.
Like the Interurban, the Green River Trail will run in a north/south
direction through Auburn. One or more eonnections between the two
trails is desirable to provide safe and convenient access in an east/west
direction across the valley. Small pocket parks or rest areas with picnic
tables and benches are proposed along the tr.ail. One planned connection
is along the extension of S. 277th Sfi�eet, where a paved trail for access
from Auburn Way North to West Valley Highway. A second east-west frail
from the Green River Trail to I St. should be located between 37th and
_
40th Street NE.
The City of Auburn is comprised of 6 general districts (Lea Hill, 1Nest Hill,
Lakeland Hills, North Auburn, South Auburn, and Southeast Auburn.
Additionally, the Downtown Urban Center is a sort of subdistrict where
North Auburn and South Auburn meet and that demands its own
approach for trails. Within each district there is a different level of
emphasis that has been placed on trail development over the years.
Trails were incorporated into Lakeland Hills from its inception. North
Auburn, South Auburn, and Southeast Auburn haye been located within
Auburn city limits for many decades which has allowed the Gity to
acquire, plan, and develop a number of parks and trails. Lea Hill and
West Hill were incorporated in 2008 which means that these areas are
light in their inventory of parks and trail assets. Each area deserves its
own inventory, needs assessment and strategic approach to the
development of parks and trails. Additionally, each district lacks non-
motorized connectivity between districts.
`Trai1 Goals and Objectives
The City and region are committed to exploring transportation
alternatives to the personal automobile. Walking and bicycling are two
options, which are low-cost, energy-efficient and non-polluting. Trails are.
a means to encourage these alternative transportation methods, while
improving accessibility between residential neighborhood and jobs,
shopping, schools; parks and other publicfacilities.
The goal to create a pedestrian and bicycle network of trails was first
introduced as Goal 7 in Chapter 4, Goals and Policies. This chapter
expands those goals and objectives with more detailed pqlicy
statements.
ORD.E Page 508 of 751
Goal 7
To create a pedestrian and bicycle network of t.rails.
Trails are most useful if they are easily reached by large numbers of
people. Like streets,they should be connestors between places people want
to go. Because of the yariety of possible destinations,a network of trails is
desirable.
Trail Network and Planning
Objective 7.1 A network of trails should be developed which provide�
adequate coverage for the entire city, and which proyides connections to
between districts within the City and to surrounding communifies.
Policy 7.1.1 A grid of interconnecting trails running both
north/south and east/west should be designed and developed:.
Consideration is given to creating safe trails to enable bicyclists,
adults, children, and other specialized users to move "seamlessly"
aeross tra'i.ls and to their destination. ,
Policy 7.1.2 The City s h o u I d seek opportunities to create
trail connections with surrounding communities. The City !
continues to participate in development of countywide and
regional trail systems,such asthe Interurban and Green River Trails. '
Connection opportunities already exist on the nqrth side of the
City with Kent and the south side of the Cify with Sumner.
Connecting Auburn's trails in these two areas is a high priority.
Additional opportunities should be explored for the west side
of the City with Federal Way and the east side of the City with
Kent and Covington.
Transportation Plan
Policy 7.1.3 The trail portions of the Fark Plan and the Non-
motorized transportation element of the Transportation Plan are
coordinated and rules ofthe road enforcement should be addressed.
Policy 7.1.4 Potential conflicts between trail users and
adjacent landowners are minimized by involving all parties during
the planning and design process.
Policy 7.1.5 Non-motorized transportation corridors should be
identified as a means of connecting Lea Hill, West Hill, Lakeland
Hills and Southeast Auburn with Downtown Auburn. It is likely
that these non-motorized connections will need to be separated
ORD.E Page 509 of 751
from the high volume vehicular corridors that currently exist
along Auburn Way South, Peasly Canyon Road, A Street SE, SE
312th Street and SE 304th Street. These corridors should be
develqped in order to promote the economic opportunities of
downtown Auburn as well as to provide greater opportunity for
use of transit and train services located in downtown Auburn.
Trail Design
Objective 7.2 Trail design and layout take advantage of unique.
natural settings,and provide safe and efficient settings for all users.
Discussion: An ideal trail is designed to be easily and quickly reached from
any point in a neighborhood, and to directly link "nodes" of activity,such
as schqols, parks, commercial centers, and transit centers. Less opportunity
exists to place trails in existing neighborhoods than in new
neighborhoods, although when opportunities arise, these should also be
explored. Sidewalks, trails and streets will form an overlapping network
gf transportation alternatives. In some settings trails and sidewalks may
be redundant.
Policy 7.2.1 Trails should be sited to connect new residential
neighborhoods with surrounding public facilities, other trails, and
activity centers.
Policy 7.2.2 Trails are designed to provide a s a f e; pleasant,
and bigh-quality experience. Trail design should be related to
surrounding natural and man-made features. Where needed,
space adjacent to the trail is designed to provide a buffer
between incompatible uses.
Policy 7.2.3 Trail amenities s h a I I b e provided at trailheads
and important activity centers. These include features such as
restrooms or portable sanitary facilities, water fountains, kiosks,
covered shelters, paved parking, benches, horse loading areas,
art, environmental and historic interpretive signs, and directional
signage:
Policy 7.2.4 Trail Iayout minimizes at-grade street
crossings.
Policy 7Z.5 The most recent version of the AASHTO
publication "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities" is
used to provide guidelines for paved trail design and
construction. ADA guidelines for accessibility is followed when
ORD.E Page 510 of 751
possible.
For soft surfaced trails accommodating mourrtain bikers, equestrians;
and hikers, when necessray developers of trails such as the
Backcountry Horsemen or the U:S. Forest Service are consulted as
needed.
Objective 7.3 The Cify participates in planning for regional trails in
South King County. Possibilities for new trail connections between
neighboring communities are explored.
Trail Connections to Public Transit
Policq 7.3.1 The City seeks to have trails connect directly to
transit centers, bus stops, and other sources of public
transportation where possible.
ORD.E Page 511 of 751
Discussion: By providing easy access to public transportation,
intermodal travel may appeal to a larger nurnber of people.
Where transit centers are reached by foot or bike, the need for
parking space may also be reduced. Where direct access to public
transportation is not pqssible, signage and route markings are
provided to the closest connections.
Serve a Variety of Users
Objective 7.4 A variety of trail types and lengths are constructed to meet
the needs of different user groups.
Discussion: Trails are used by all ages of people, who are engaged in
many different activities. To meet these diverse demands, recreational
loop paths in parks and neighborhoods are needed,aswell as lineartrails
for both recreational and commuting use.
Trail Recommendations
Because of their magnitude, trail development is a long and involved
process. Planning of trail projects usually occurs far in advance of their
actual construction.This section identifies potential trails deserving of
further research and planning, or have already undergone a certain
amou_nt of planning or design. Some of these trails can serve as part of
the transportation network and are also included in Auburn's
Transportation Plan.
It is important we take an aggressive approach to securing easements in .
locations where active development eould remove the opporfunity for
future trails. A prime example of this is the Tacoma-Covington powerline,
where warehouse and parking lot development on the valley floor may
eliminate the possibility of an important potential east/west trail
between Auburn and Federal Way.
ORD.E Page 512 of 751
Potential Trails for Future Development
1. BPA Trail(Lea Hill)
Location: .laoobsenTree Farm Propertyt�Isaaac Evans P�ark
Project Description:
• Acquire land and private property easements for construction of a trail that will connect
Lea Hill to the valley floor. The trail is anticipated to extend to and through the Auburn
Golf Course where it will connect to the internal loop trail at Isaac Evans Park and use the
Dykstra footbridge to gain access to the west side of the Green River.
Schedule: TBD
Cost: TBD
Funding: Grant
3. A Street SE Trail •
Locafion: A Street from south City limits to downtown
Project Description:
� Work with City of Pacific to create a plan for crossing the White River bridge safely
and getting to Auburn's squth City Iimits
• Class I trail from 41st St. SE to Cross Street
• Pedestrian/Bicycle funnel under SR 18
s Project is envisioned on BNSF ROW
Schedule: TBD
Cosf: $1,116,U00
Funding: Mitigation for construction of intermodal freight yard
4. White River Trail
Location: A Street SE to Interurban Trail
Project Descripfion:
e Connect the western end of the White River Trail to the Interurban trail to
improve connections and trail user circulation for residents in the southern
portion of the City. An A Street underpass and crossing the Wh.ite River
create significant challenges for this project.
Schedule: To be identified
Cost: TBD
Funding: Apply for grants
5. Green River Trail - North Auburn portion
Location: Reddington Levee Trail near fihe Port Property to S.
277th St. Project Description:
o Regional trail project from Seattle through Kent,and
ORD.E Page 513 of 751
ending at the Auburn Narrows. Through joint efforts by
Auburn and King Cqunty, preliminary planning and design
are completed for the North Auburn portion of the trail.
City of Auburn will work with developer as developments
are constructed along Green River.
Schedulec TBD
Cost: TBD
Funding: King County and Grants
6. Mill Creek Corridor/Auburn Environmental Park
Location: Along the Mill Creek, primarily north of SR 18
Project Description:
o A Linear Park project would introduce residents to the unique sefting and
ecosystem along the.Creek.Trail surface would probably be a softsurface,and
development alongside would be minimal, concentrating on environmental �
education.
Sehedule: To be identified
Cost: TBD
Funding: Impact Fees,Wetland Mitigation
7. Southeast Trails (Williams Trail)
Location: South ofthe Stuck(White) Riyer, and east of Kersey Way
Project Description:
o Develop trails through open s:pace in southeast Auburn, along utility corridors, where
possible. Use existing trails created by equestrians in the area as a basis for
developing a good network.
Schedule: To be identified
Cost: TBD
Funding: Impact Fees/Grant
8. Fufure Trails identified in the Auburn Non-motorized
Transportation Plan
Schedule: To be identified
Cost: TBD
Funding: Impact Fees/Grant
ORD.E Page 51_4 of 751
ORD.E Page 515 of 751
- �
�
�
ORD.E Page 516 of 751
Chapter 9
Gettin� it All Do�e
The previous chapters of this plan inventoried and analyzed the existing parks, open spaces,
and recreation programs here in Auburn. The result is a series of recommendations to meet
the needs of our present and future residents. Chapter 9 takes the recommendations from
Chapters 3 through 8 and integrates them into a plan of action. Looking at all the needs
together is usefpl for providing a "global" picture of our long-terrn vision. Following the action
and irnplementation plan outlined in this chapter will accomplish that vision.
This chapter is divided into three primary components:
I. Meeting Park and Open Space Needs
II. Meeting Recreation Facility and Program Needs
III. Financing Future Capital Improvements
This chapter will also provide a summary of the recommended actions,cost estimates for
implementing these improvements,give an approximate time f�ame for completion, and
indicate possible fundingsources.
I. Meeting Park and Open Space Needs
Section I eompiles the conclusions and reeommendations from previous chapters and creates a
program that, if followed, will keep Auburn on track to provide recreational sites for its
constituents.Thefollowing four steps are necessary to ensu.re that we have sufficient parks and
open spaces for all our residents, and future residents and that they are in optimal condition.
Step 1: Maintain Existing Parks and Facilities
Step 2: RenoVate Existing Parks and Facilities
Step 3:Acquire and Develop New Parks and Facilities
Step 4:Acquire and Manage Open Space
Table 9-1, provides a summary of identified actions to accomplish each of the steps
above.The following pages and the Appendix provide more information about each of these
action items.
Step 1:Maintain Existing Parks and Facilities
Survey respondents reported that maintaining our parks is of primary importance.
Management and maintenance of parKs is an on-going task that occurs in all parks.Those
ORD.E Page 517 of 751
locations,which are highly visible or heavily used,receive highest priority.As new parks are
added to the system, maintenance requirements will also grow. In addition to appropriate staff
increases, a new park maintenance facility may be needed to handle work in an efficient
manner in the Lea Hill annexat'ion area.
Step 2:Improve Existing Parks and Facilities
Auburn residents expressed, in the public survey and in public meetings,that upgrading existing
parks and providing more beautification projects were high p�iorities. Renovation of parks
should include measures to improve aesthetics, circulation, safety, accessibility to all persons,
and to rehabilitate or replace recreation equipment and facilities/amenities. Highest priority is
given to those parks that experience extremely high use or represent a particularly important
resource. Parks with safety or accessibility issues will also receive high priority.The Appendix
details improvement projects,their estimated costs, and proposed funding sources:
Step 3:Acquire and Devetop New Parks and Facilities
With a growing population, and land still available for future growth, it is necessary to consider
acquisition and development of parks to serve our future population.The standards
recommended in Chapter 3 provide fhe basis for determining how mueh land and what
fac.ilities we need now, and what may be needed in the future.
5tep 4:A:cquire and Ma_.nage Open Space
The City owns several open space properties, some of which were recently acquired; Some of
these acquisitions will receive minimal de�elopment suitable for a passive recreation
experience: Land,that is environmentally sensitiye or inaccessible, may not receive frequent
visitors, but will still require stewardship to guarantee and monitor fhe health and conditions
found in these locations.
ORD:E Page 518 of 751
TABLE 9-1
Summary of Identi�ed Needs
Park and Open Space Land and Facilities
Step 1: Perform All parks shall receive regular maintenance to ensure that
Regular they are SAFE, HEACTHY,ATTRACTIVE and CLEAN.
Maintenance
Step 2: Improve 1. Renovate all parks to meet ADA requirements as
Existing Parks funding is acquired.
and Facilities 2. Rerform major renovations:
Cameron, Cedar Lanes, Game Farm, Game Farm Park
_ Wildernesss; Isaae Evans, Les Gove,Shaughnessy Park.
__ _ .
Step 3: Acquire and Current Need: City owns the following properties.
Develop New Develop to meet eurrent needs: Green River Stormwater
Parks Facilify Park&Trail; Les Gove.Park;Jacobsen Tree Farm, 1Q4tn
7 Street Property, Auburndale II, West Hill Lake
Future Need:
Develop by2025: Consider acquiring and developing
properties in the Lea Hill,West Hill,anci southeastern
portions of the City.
De�elop Current Need: 5gymnasiums, 11 Softball and.youth baseball
Recreation fields, 2 Soccer/football fields 2 Fields.
Facilities Future Need:
By 2025:4 Softball/Youth Baseball fields, 8 football/soccer
fields, 5 tennis courts, 12 gymnasiums
_. _
Step 4: Manage Open Olson Canyon, Green River Access/Fenster Property, I
Space Lakeland Nature Area, Crifical Areas, Other lands as
identified
Future pa.rkland needs are summariied in Table 9-2.This table uses the standards in Chapter 3
to determine the number of additional acres that will be needed in ten years and fifteen years
from now if our population continues to grow as expected,The purpose of each column of
Table 9-2 is described below.
Column 1:Park Type
Three park categories—neighborhood, community and linear parks- are incfuded in this table,
indicatingthe "core" packs that make wp the majority of our park system.These are parks
largely devoted to active recreation or sports.
Columns 2&3:
2015 Total Existing Acre.s/2015 Developed Acres
ORD.E Page 519 of 751
These eolumns compare total aereage in each of the core park categories with the amount of
land that is actually developed for recreational use.This information reveals that more than
80°�of the land in these types of parks is already fully developed.
Population Estimates
Current Population
76,347
Year 2026
84,948
Year2030
89,8fi8
Column 4:2004 Remaining Undeveloped Acres
The remaining undeveloped acreagefound in existing parks is avaifable
for development. In some instanaes,such as the neighborhood and linear parks,these are
largely incidental spaces that need a small amount of landscaping or walkway to be complete.
Our cornmunity parks contain some larger spaces that could accommodate additional
recreational features or updating of faeilities.
Colum.n Sc Park 5tandards—Developed Acres
per 1000 Residents
In Chapter 3 we recommended that a standard of 6.03 acres of parkland be acquired and
deVeloped per 1,000 residents.The goal of setting a standard is to ensure that the level and
quality of parks remains the same as it is today, e�en if the population of our community
increases. As noted in Chapter 3,these standards reflect the amount of developed acreage ih
our core park types: neighborhood, community and linear parks.
Columns 6&7:Additional Acres Needed-2025 and 2030
_
The last fwo columns refer to the amount of developed park land needed in the future to meet
the demands of a growing population.These figures are 6ased on the standard shown in tfie
previous column.
Table 9-2 Future Park Acrea e Needs
Park Types 2015(Total 2015 2015 Adopted Future Future
Acres) (Dev'd (Undev'd Standa.rd Need:2025 Need:2030
acres) Acres) (In developed (Est.Pop (Est.Pop
acres/1,000 res.) 84,948) 89,868)
Neighborhood Parks 67.84 67.84 58.74 1.32 44.29 50.97
Community Parks 267.81 267.81 223J5 4.5 158.48 180.6.3
Open Space Areas 386.89 NJA 386.89 As acquired N/A N/A
Trails/Linear Parks 26.39 26.39 Miles N/A 0.21 0 0
ORD.E Page 520 of 751
Neighborhood Park Needs
Most of the City has good geographic coverage of Neighborhood Parks. Slight shortages occur
in some fully developed neighborhoods,such as the cenf:ral pa.rt of Auburn, but these are offsef
by Community Parks that serve the same areas.To meet neighborhood park demands 44.29
additional acres will be needed in this category by 2025 to meet the projected increase in
population. Several options for meeting these needs are presented below.
202 rJ: Meeting Neigh.borhood Park Needs
To meet a need for 44.29 additional acres of Neighborhood Parks in 2025 it is recommended
that the City ehoose one of the following two options, or a combination of the two:
Option 1.Complete developmen.t of existing neighborhood parks.
The following parks have undeveloped acreage:
Auburndale Park 9.74 acres
Auburndale Park II 9.34 acres
TOTAL: 19.08 acres
Both parks listed above are located in the Lea Hill portion of the City,which is in need of
additional park area. Completing development of these parKs,while needed, is unlikely to
create appreciable increases in recreational facilities. Auburndale needs minor improvements
such as landscaping and a new playground. Auburndale II is the only undeveloped I
neighborhood park in the park inventory.
Option 2.Acquire and develop new park land. Even with improving Auburndale and developing
Auburndale II, the City's parks system will still be deficient for neighborhood parks by over 25
acres. To meet future needs for neighborhood parks,the C.ity needs to consider acquiring
add.itional park property in the West Hill and southeastern areas of the City.
ZQ3Q: Meeting N.eighborhood Park Needs
If population continues to increase as expected then the City will need to add 50.97 acres of
additional neighborhood park land. This will need to be done by either developing existing City
owned property managed by departments other than parks, and/or acquire park land in areas
of the City where we are not meeting demands and level of service standards.
Community Park Needs
Geographic coverage of the city with community parks is good. However, crowding may
occasionally occur to their popularity. Analysis by neighborhood area shows that Lea Hill, West
Hill, and southeast Auburn are most in need of community parks. Community parks typically
contain more highly deyeloped athletic fields than do neighborhood parks,ahd also provide
ORD,E Page 521 of 751
restrooms, parking, picnic sheltersand other amenities.This makes them more costly to
develop. Based on current standards the City's current Community Park inventory is deficient
by 119 acres. This sharp increase in park needs is because the City's population has nearly
dqubled since the last Park Plan update in 2005.
2025: Meeting Community Park Needs
Available Community Park land can be increased by eompleting partially deVeloped parks,
developing unimproved land in City ownership, or by acquiring and developing new land. For
example;facilities such as a skate park, loop trail, play structure or basketball court could be
added to a partially developed Community Park. Some options for the next decade deseribed
below:
Option 1.Complete development of e.xisting Community parks.
The following existing parks contain undeveloped acreage:
West Hill Lake Property 9.25 acres
104th Ave Sf Properfy 14.73 acres
Jacobsen Tree Farm 29.30 acres
Les Gove Park 4.1 acres
Game Farm 4:0 acres
Lakeland Hills Nature Area 46.75
TOTAL: 108.13 acres
Highest priority should be given to implementing the proposed improvements in the Les Gove
Master Plan, developing the West Hill Lake Property, and the Lakeland Hills Nature Area. These.
parks will provide a significant increase in the Ievel of service for the least amount of money.
Next the City needs to explore opportuhities to develop Jacobsen Tree Farm info a regional
sports complex,and to the 104th Ave SE property along the Green River. All of these parks
contain facilities which are very much in demand;and will be most beneficial to the entire
community if development occurs.
Option 2.Acquire and develop additional park land in the areas of the City where current and future
dem.an.ds are not being met.
As previously discussed;areas of Auburn in need of additional Community Park land incl.udes
_
the Lea Hill,West Hill, and southeast Auba�n areas of the Cify. By tfie year 2025, 158.48
additional acres of park land will need to be developed in order to meet future demands and
level of service standards
ORD:E Page 522 of 751
203�: Meeting Community Park Needs
Potential community park locations which have unique resources; or that are expected to
receiVe significant residential development over the next 15 years are identified here.These
parks will be acquired and developed concurrently with new housing construction.A balance
between passive and active recreafional uses should continue to be pursued. By the year 2030,
the City will need to add more than 180 acres of Community Park land to meet current
standards.
Academy A�ea Park
A community park,located in the area around the Adventist Academy would serve a large and
growing commanity that is somewhat distant from other recreational sites.This is a desirable
location for a well-developed sports complex.
Trails/Linear Parks
Trails/Linear parks, which generally run along an existing linearfeature such as a river or utilify
corridor, are considered to serve the entire city.Auburn has a unique opportunity for linear
park development,with its generous supply of rivers, creeks, railroads and utility corridors. For
this reason, it should be emphasized that the standard is only a minimu,m suggested acreage.
This is a category where trail development also serves a transportation need and development.
beyond the minimum standard will be very useful to community members.
2025 to 2030: Meeting Trail/Linear Park Needs
Like the other types,Trail/Linear Park land can also be increased by completing pactially
developed parks, by developing unimproved land currently in Cify ownership, or by acquiring
and developing new land. Several possibilities are described below:
• Acquire land and easements for the BPA Trail from Jacobsen Tree Farm to the Auburn
Golf Course. This will greatty improve connectivity betwe.e_n the Lea Hill and Valley
Floor.
O Extend the Green River Trail north from the Reddington Levee Trail to South 277th
Street. This area is currently owned by King County and the Port of Seattle.
e White River Trail extension from A Street SE to the Interurban Trait.
• Mill Creek Corridor Trail System on the west side of SR 167. With the recently
completed MiII Creek realignment,there is significant environmental educafion
opportunities in this area.
• Auburn Environmenfal Park trail connects to the Interurban Trail.
ORD.E Page 523 of 751
Summary of Park Land iVeeds
Auburn is fortunate to still have many opportunities for expansion of its parl(system, both to
meet the needs of current residents, and for those who will be joining us in the next 15 years.
But it requires looking ahead, and sometimes making a commitment to acquiring land suitable
for these uses before development makes it impossible.The options presented in the previous
pages show the breadth ofichoices available during the next six to fifteen years.To recap,there
are several directions we can take to continae to provide fully developed, high quality parks for
our community. We have several options to accomplish this:
Option 1,Compl.ete development in existing parks.
This approach is the least costly, because property purchase is not necessary. It also will provide
the finishing touches that several parks still need. However, most developed parks already
contain all the reereational facilities that are possible, and most development is more aesthetic
or practical (as in improved parking) in nature. An exception is Les Gove Park.The recently
completed Master Plan of the Les Gove Park will open more active/passive opportunities for
the community.
Option 2.Create parks using land currently owned by the City.Several properties have been
purchased or land turned over frorn King County in recent years that are suitable for
Neighborhood and Co:mmunity Parks.Again,future costs will be lower because property
purchase is already complete.The 104 Ave SE, Lakeland Hill Nature Area,and the West Hill Lake
properties discussed briefly above will give us the opportunity to develop some unique new
Community Parks. Because of their open space character and funding source,these parks are
best developed for passive recreations uses. In addition,the Jacobsen Tree Farm property
provides an opportun;ity to develop a regional sports complex in a relatiVely underserved part
of the Cify.
Option 3.Acquire a_nd develop new land,particul,arlyto meet needs of new residents.These parks
will be acyuired and developed as opportunitie5 arise, such as gifts of land or grants,fee in lieu
of, or by impact fees collected from the development of new residential units.
ORD.E Page 524 of 751
II. idieeting Recreation Faciloty and Program Needs
This section presents recreation facilities and programs planned for the present, and for ten
a,nd fifteen years from now. Facilities and programs go hand-in-hand, since most recreation,
educational or cultural programs are possible only if an adequate facility is available.
Each major recreation facility type is discussed below, with suggesfions for addressing
deficiencies and meeting the goals developed in Chapter3.These goals can be used as new
parks are planned,to determine which facilities are most needed or most appropriate for the
park being considered.
Facility needs are determined by surveying residents about their level of recreation
participation and their needs and desires for the future, by examining national standards and
recreation trends, by input from the recreation staff, and by the number and type of sport
teams and each sport's play requirements.
Baseball
Current need:
With participation rates and baseball steady at best,the City is currently meeting demands and
needs for baseball fie.lds,
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
One additional baseball field will be needed by 2025 and two fields will need to be added by
2030. It is recommended that this be placed in a new communify park in the north or southeast
part of the city.
Recommended Future Development:
JacobsenTree Farm
Softball/Youth Baseball Fields
Current need:
With softball and youth baseball numbers holding relatively steady there is a strong need to
add more fields. Based on current standards the City is deficient in this category by 11 fields:
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
Development of new community and neighborhood parks should include fields capable of
supporting softball and youth baseball. Fields should be located in the following areas as
adja.cent residential neighborhoods develop. By 2030, it is expected that the City will need to
add 18 f'ields to keep up with the demand of Auburn residents.
Recommended Future Development:
Academy Area Community Park
Jacobsen Tree Farm
ORD.E Page 525 of 751
Football Fields
Current need•
The demand for football fields has remained fairly constant in.recent years. Even with the
recent improvements to school district facilities the City needs to add 8 footbaU fields to meet
the demands of our current population.The primary need now is for practice time.
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
Ten additional fields will need to be added by 2025 and 18 by Z030.
Recommended Future Development:
Academy Area Community Park
Jacobsen Tree Farm
Additional sites to be identified
Soccer
Current need:
The rapidly growing interest in soceer has spurred the need for development of new soccer
facilities. The demands and needs calculations considered "mini" or modified fields used fo�
youth and adult leagues respectiyely. Based on current standards 2fields need to be added at
this time. With the growing popularity of the sport more fields may need be added to meet
future demand.
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
Future soccer fields should be located in community parks when they are developed. By the
year 2025 a minimum of 6 fields will need to be added, while 9 fields will need be added by the
year 2030. With socaer and football being played on similar sized playing fields the
development of additional fields could meet the needs for both football and soecer.
Recommended Futu�e 5occer Fiel.d Development:
Jacobsen Tree Farm
Academy Area Community Pa�k
North Auburn Commuhity Park
Additional partnerships with schools and private organizations
Tennis Courts
Current and future need:
Sufficient tennis court sp.ace means that additional courts are not needed at this time.The
construction of eight tennis courts at Auburn Mountain View High School adjacent to Jacobsen
Tree Farm Park will provide sufficient court space for the city for many years.
Gymnasiums
Current need:
Even with the recent construction of the 2 gyms at the Les Gove Community Campus thece is
still great demand for availability during the day and early evening hours. Calculations indicate
ORD.E Page 526 of 751
that the City is short 10 gyms. The construction of the community center later this yearwill
accommodate fitness classes so some of demand for gy.m space will be met: It is not realistic to
expect to construct 10 new gymnasiums so the Cify will need to consider other opfions to gain
access to existing gyms around the City.
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
Within the next ten to fifteen years an additional fwelVe to thirteen gymnasiums will be needed
respectively. Some of this space may become available if additional schools are built.
Meantime, space should be reserved for developrnent of a third gymnasium at the proposed
Gommunity Center.
Recommended development:
Partnerships with private organiiations like churches
Fufure School Development 2 gym
Swimming Pools
Current and future need:
Additional need for swimming pools is not expected now or in the near future.The construction
of the new YMGA has filled the current need.
_ _
Loop Trails ,
Current need and future needs:
Recreational loop trails are located prima�ily in neigh6orhood and community parks, for easy
use and access by neighborhood residents. Demands and needs analysis indicates that the City
is currently meeting current standards. However walk and jogging trails are overwhelmingly
the most popular and desirable park facilities of the residents of Auburn. The following existing
and proposed parks are recommended to receive trail development.
Recommended Loop Trail Development:
Veterans Memorial Park
Rotary Park
West Hill Watershed
Qlson Canyon
Auburn Environmental Park
Recreation/Transportation Trails
These longer, destination oriented trails serve recreating cyclists, pedestrians, equestrians and
other users, as well as those who use the trail for transportation purposes,
Current need and Future Needs:
With an increasing interest in alternafive modes of transportation for commuting and accessing
regional trails systems, recreation and transportation trails are important to the residents of
Auburn. Efforts should continue to complete these important trail corridors.
ORD.E Page 527 of 751
Recommended Recreation/Transportation Trail Development:
Green River Trail
White RiverTrail
To meet future need,2025 to 2030:
This plan recommends the development of two Linear Parks to meet the needs offuture
re5idenfs. IVlill Creek Corridor and South East Trails are proposed to meet trail needs by the year
2010.
Recommended Future Recreation/Transportation Trail Development
Mill Creek Corridor:
BPA Trail—lacobsen Tree Farm to Auburn Golf Course
Recreation, Cultural and Heritage Prograrn Services
Chapter 6, Recreation, Cultural, Heritage and Preseryation Progcams, developed a.n extensive
list of reeommendations ahd conclusions.
Capitai Improvements
The projects and program improvements suggested in this plan will require a substantial
financial commitment to accomplish. Some of these can be achieved within the annual Parks
and Recreation Department budget. Other, more costly projects will need to be analyzed
carefully to deterrnine the source(s) of funding we want to pursu:e,and to determine when it
will be fiscally advantageous to pursue them.There are five primary funding sources that can
be usedto finance parkcapital improvements:
1.City Funding—includes Bonds;the General Fund,and Real Estate ExciseTax
2.Grants and Countyviride l.nitiatives
3.Developer fees and Dedications(Impact Fees)
4.Gifts/Dedications/Donations
5:Program Fee.s
1, City Funding
The three basic optioris for City-based financing include the City's General Fund, Councilmanic
or General Obiigation Bonds,and the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET).
Tyjiiaally;the General Fund pays for staff costs and operating expenses for the Parks and
Recreation Department. Ongoing, regular maintenance costs of parks and purchase of
equipment are also paid for in this manner,Ttie General Fund has ra_rely been used in the past
for large capital projects such as the purchase of land, or building of new parks.
The Real Estate Excise Tax is a 0.5%tax on the sale of real estate.These funds can be used for
repair, replacement, and capital expenditures of park facilities: Partnerships with pcivate
organizations (OPM).
ORD.E Page 528 of 751.
2. Grants and Countywide Initiatives
Grants have been a very instrumental tool in building the park system we have today. Since the
1:980s,the C_ity has received more than$7 million from grant sources, A major source is the
Washington State Recreation Office (RCO)which administers state and federal funds for
conservation and outdoor recreation purposes. RCO is made up ofthe directors offour state
agencies and five citizen members who bring together a wide range of experience and
viewpoints.
The largest program offered by the RCO is the Washington V1/ildlife and Recreation Program
(WWRP).This is available for local government projects involving the acquisition, development
and renovation of parks, urban wildlife habitat, open space,trails, and water access facilities,
All projects accepted for WWRP funding require a 50%0 local match,and a Parks, Recreation and
Open Space Plan adopted within the last six years.This Parks Plan will enable the City of Aubum
to apply f.or these funds from 2016 through 2022.
King County has several grant programs which have helped the City purchase land
and/or develop eight recreation sites in Auburn. We will continue to aggressively pursue all
grant opportunities that will assist in the renovation of existing parks, or developmenf of new
ones.
3. Developer Fees
The State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) allows cities to request mitigation for impacts to
the park system created by large scale residential development, In Auburn,land has been
contributed by developers to create Lakeland Hills Park, Sunset Park, Gaines Rar.k, and Mill Pond
Park:
Existing standards for the City assert that developments of 50 or more dwelling units create.
sufficient:impact on the availability of park space that mitigation should be provided. The 1986
Park Plan established standards of 6 acres per 1000 residents for Community Parks and 1.25
acres per 1000 for Neighborhood Parks. Under SEPA developers typically contribute land only,
and the City is responsible for all development.
This 2005 Farks Plan recommended the adoption of impact fees for parks, as allowed by the
Growth Management Act of 1990.lmpact fees for parks are used to pay for the capital costs of
pablic facilities needed to serve the people who occupy new residenfial development. Capital
costs may include the purchase of lanci and costs for designing and constructing recreation
facilities.These fees are paid by the de�eloper of any reSidenfial unit, not just by those building
more than 50 units:The term "developer" is used to denote anyone who is obligated to pay
impact fees, including builders, owners or developers.
Credit for Contributions by the Developer
ORD.E Page 529 of 751
Impact fees do not include any other forms of developer con.tribut.ions or e.xaction.s, such as
mitigation or voluntary payments authorized by SEPA. Since there are other sources of revenue
available for park development, impact fees are not expected to pay for 100%of new park
development.The Gity also has the choice of aecepting cash for the irnpact fee, or aceepting
land, recreational irnprovements or a combination of these. If the City accepts a method other
than cash,the developer will receive a credit in-lieu of impacfifees.
Servite Area for Impact Fees and Expenditures �
Parks and recreation facilities impact fees are collected and expended throughout the City of
Auburo.7he City boundaries create a'single service area for park impact fees. Impact fees must
be spent on capital projects contained. in an adopted capital facilities plan, or they can be used
to reimburse the government for the unused capacity of existing facilities. For example, some
existing park land is not yet fully developed.Where improvements for these areas are identified
in this plan, impact fees can be used to help pay for such improvements: Impact fees not
expended within six years must be refunded.
Development Standard.s
This Plan depicts five different types of park land within Auburn:
1.Neighborhood parks
2.Community parks
3.Trails/Linear parks
4.Open space land
5.Special use areas
The first three of these, Neighborhood, Communify and Trails/Linear Parks are considered the
"core" parks in our system.These are the parks which are the most intensely developed and
used for recreation. Developers will be required to cont.ribute to this core system by providing
cash, land; recreational facilities, or a combination, as described above.The sfiandards
established in Chapter 3 of this plan will be used to determine the parks impact fee.
Section II of this chapter identifies capital projects that will be (1) needed to maintain the City's
current level of parks and recreation facilities, and (2) needed to meet the expected growth,
based on the adopted development standards.
Rates for Impact Fees
Impact fees are calculated based on the projected cost of buying land appropriate for each of
the park categories,and the costs of purchasing, installing or construcfiing the recreation
facilities and amenities typical to each type of park.A separate cost calculation is made for each
of the three types of core parks. Impact fee rates are found in the document"Rate Study`for
Impact Fees for Parks and Recreation Facilities."
4. Gifts
The City occasionally receives gifts of land, land leases, or money for park properties.These
have primarily come from other public agencies.
ORD.E Page 530 of 751
The City pursued gifts in the Sharing and Gift Catalog.This source will be explored and
marketed in the future more thoroughly.The Parks Department intends to establish a "Give to
the Future" program to encourage more private donations.The program will provide
information to individuals about how to contribute,the tax benefits of giving, and projects that
need sponsors.
Gapita� campaigns to solicit funds could be a significant source of income forspecial projects..
For example,the White River Valley Wistorical Museum raised $480,000 in cash and in-kind
donations through its very effective eapital carnpaign.These funds will enable the Histo"rical
Society to make significant improvements to the Museum building and displays.
5. Program Fees
Another method for raising capital or covering operating expenses may include increasing fees
for facilities such as picnic shelters or baseball fields. Similarly, increasing the atlministrative
charge on recreation programs and classes is necessary periodically. The City's goal is to keep
fees-affordable to individuals who are residents of Auburn and to small groups. However, when
large groups use facilities, fees should be charged that reflect the additional staffing, equipment
and cleanup needed.
An example of program fees is the capital improvement fee charged to adult athletic teams.
This fee generates about$20,000 annually.These funds have been used to improve facilities
used by adult athletic teams such as the installation of a new restroom at Fulmer Field and a
new light system at Brannan Park Field#2.
Summary of Park Financing Options
The City has several options it can use to fund. development of new parKs, and improvements or
expansions of existing parks.The most realistie approach is to pucsue each of the five primary
funding mechanisms described above.
With the adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan,the City will be eligible to
compete for grants from RCO and other sources.To efficiently use limited staff grant writing
time the Parks and Recreation Department intend.s to aggressively track and apply for those
grants that will,be most beneficial to the City and for which it has a good chance of success.
ORD,E Page 531 of 751
� �xhi�it 12
PIJ ��IC OU�TREAC� OV�RVIEW
• July 14—staff presentation to Auburn Noon Lions
e July 18—citywide email is sent out announcing public workshops
• July 18—citywide postcard mailer is sent out announcing public workshops;also dropped at
local grocery stores,all city facilities(e.g. parKs,golf course),YMCA,etc,
o Ju:ly 21—staff presentation to Auburn Sen.ior Center Advisory BoarcJ
o August 5—staff presentation to Rotary
• August 6=Lakeland Community Genter workshop
� August 7=Mayor's weekly email update announcing workshops
• August 11=Auburn Library workshop
m August 12—staff presentation to Soroptimist
o August 13—Wesley Homes workshop
m August 18—Valley Counseling workshop
o August 20—staff presentation to Kiwanis.
o August 31—citywide email is sent out requesfing comment on the Plan
o October 13—webpage is updated with the Core Plan and Volumes 1,2 and 5 and all appendices
o October 13—"Talk Auburn"web based commenting portal is launched so that the public may
submit comments
• October 13—transmit Core Plan and Volumes 1,2 and S to PSRC and 5tate D.epartment of
Commerce
e October 20—citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Rlan
e October 26—City Council Study Session
� October 20=Planning Commission meeting
e November 1—citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Plan
e November 2—City Council Study Session
e November 4—Planning Commission meeting/hearing
o November 9—City Council Study Session
o November 10—webpage is updated with Volumes 3,4,6 and 7
o November 10—transmit Volumes 3,4,6 and 7 to PSRC and State Department of Commerce
o November 19—citywide email is sent out requesting commenton the Plan
o November 23—City Council Study Session
s December 8—Planning Commission meeting/hearing
ORD.E Page 532 of 751
Exhibit 13 Public Commer�t#1
�� �"'�� � 7USTIN S.HARVEY
Senior Vice President-lnvestments
Auburn Planning Commission
25 W Main Street,
Auburn,WA 98001
RE: Proposed Revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Cabot Properties,through the entity Cabot IV—WA 1 W02,LLC, is the owner of the property located at
402 Lund Road in Auburn.
I am writing in support of the Community Development&Public Works Department's recommended
revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan that redesignat.e.s as"LigHt Indu.strial"the lands now
identified as"Environmental Park"in the City's existing Comprehensive Plan. We strongly wge the City
to adopt this change to its Comprehensive Plan and to rezone to M-1 -Light Industrial all properties now
zoned EP-Erivironmerital Park:
Our properly,like many surrounding properties,was developed under the Light Industrial zoning that was
in place in this portion of Auburn prior to the enactment of zon.ing by the City in 2006 that designated my
property and surrounding properties as being in the EP-Environmental Park zone. As you know,the EP
zoning never'attracted the type of development that may have been contemplated at the fime of ifs
adoption. Moreover,the constraints imposed by the EP zon.e crea.ted signifieant problems for me and
other sim'ilarly situated owners,whose properties had been developed with Light Industrial uses.
As you know, last year we successfqlly sought ehanges to the zoning code to remove the threat of
nonconforming use status to all of the existing warehousing and distribution uses located in the EP zone.
However,that was only a temporary fix. The permanent solution,now recommended by staff, is to return
these properties to their appropriate Light Industrial zoning: This c.hange will encourage reinvestment in
the.se properties and bring economic growth to the City.
We encourage your support of the staff's recommended ehanges to retum ttiis portion of Auburn to a
Light Industrial land use classification and to rezone these properties to Light Industrial as soon as
possible. Please feel free to reach out to me at(617)305-6143 with any questions. Thank you.
Best regards,
,�
Justin S. Harvey
Senior Vice President—Investments
Cabot Properties,LP
Cab.ot Properties,LP
One Beacon Street,Suite 1700 o Boston,Massachusetts 02108 o Tel(617)305-6143 o Fax(617)723-4200
ORD.E Page 533 of 751
Public Cnmment#2
Auburn Planning Commission
25 W Main Street,
A.uburn, WA 98001
RE: Proposed Revisions to the Aubum Comprehensive Plan
Dear Pianning Commissioners: ,��� �`" , � , � , i {
_ t � �,7 . .�. `�.�:k
�M-..�,
lill Moodie�for the l.und Buildi.ng �
902 4`" St�eet S.W.
��� ��� ���3
� � ��� � � '�.�a�.���`
��.I�1�S#'�E � i
Auburn, WA 98001 �� �. ���p � � ,y����,�e�,�
I a.m writing in support of the Community Development & Public Wo�ks Department's
recommended revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan that redesignates as"Light ,
_
IndustciaP'the lands now iden..tified as"Enyironmental Park"in the City's existing Comp�etiensive
Plan. We strongly urge the City to adopt this change to its Comprehensive Plan and to rezone to
M-1 - Light Industrial all properties now zoned EP - Environmental Park.
My property,like many surrounding properties,was developed under the Light Industrial zoning that
was in place in this por-tion of Auburn prior to the enactment of zoning by the City in 2006 that
.
designated my property and surrounding properties as being in the EP-Environmental Park zone;As
you know,the EP zoning never attracted the type of development that may have been contemplatedat
the time of its adoption. Moreover,the constraints imposed by the EP mne created significant
problems for me and other similarly situated owners,whose properties had been developed with Light
Industrial uses.Ou.r building had nonconforming uses.The building was designed wholly for light
industrial,distribution and warehousing only. The changeto the EP zoning made it impossible forus to
re�nance our building for years�Lending institutions will not loan money on a building that has
nonconforming uses This also made the property unsalable. A buyer cou.ld n.ot procure financing to
purchase the building from us.The EP zoning also left us exposed to a catastrophic financial loss ifthe
building was heavily damaged because we would h.ave been unable to rebuild it with insurance proceeds
as the uses of the building were nonconforming.
As you know; last yea�we successfuqy sought changes to the zoning code to remove the threat of '
nonconforming use status to all of the existing warehousing and distribution uses located in the EP zone�
Nowever,that was only a temporary fix. The permanent solution,now recommended by staff,is to
�eturn these pfoperties to their appropriate Light Industrial zoning. This change will encourage
reinvestment in these properties and bring economic growth to the City.
We encourage your supportof the staff's recommended changes to return this portion ofAuburn to a
Light Industrial land use classi�cation and to rezone these properties to light Industrial as soon as
possible.
Jill N�odie ,� � �
f� - ����
%��`�
ORD:E Page 534 of 751
PugetSa�nd �egional Cour�cil ��'��'� �°�'�'��'t��
'
November 3,2015
Jeff Tate,Deputy Director
City of Auburn Community Development Services
25 W Main Street
Auburn,WA 98001
Subject: PSRC comments on dcaft Auburn Comprehensive Plan update
Dear Jeff;
Thank you for providing an opportunity for the Puget Sound Regional Council to review draft elements of the
City of Auburn 2015 Coinprehensive Plan.We recognize the substantial amount of time and effort invested in
this plan and appreciate the chance to review it while in draft form.This timely collaboration helps to ensure
certification requirements are adequately addressed and certification action can be taken by PSRC boards upon
adoption; In providing an expedited review,this letter addresses the Comprehensive Transportafion Plan and
Core Plan only, PSRC will provide additional comments in follow-up correspondence on Land Use,Housing, �
and additional plan elements.
We would like to note the many outstanding aspects of the draft plan components that serve to icriplement
VISION 2040. Several particularly noteworthy aspects include:
� An innovative approach to organizing the plan document that focuses on ci.ty values,plan outcomes,
and prioritizing actions.
e Clear discu.ssion and policies addressing interjurisdictional coordination in the city's planning.
o Emphasis on providing mobility options to people with special needs,including an analysis of transit- '
dependent communities in the city.
• Provisions supporting inultimodal transportation options and design for healthy communities..
0 Emphasis on preservation and maintenance of the transportation system.
The draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Core Plan advance regional policy in mariy iinportant ways.
There are a few items,however,that should be addressed before the plan is finalized:
• VISION 2040 calls for local plans to include _a context statement that describes how the plan addresses
regional policies and provisions adopted in VISION 2040. Examples of context statements are
piovided in PSRC's Plan fZevies�-Manual,page 2-1.PSRC staff is also available to provide examples
adopted in local comprehensive plans.
� VISION 2040 contains policies(MPP-DP-7,MPP-'P-12)that encourage local jurisdictions to
prioritize infrastructure funding,including transportation and capital facility investments,to support
the development of regional growth centers.The city is encouraged to include compatible policy
language and supportive infrastiucture investments where appropriate.
• The plan discusses several future norimotorized and Safe Routes to Schools investments. The city
should consolidate the list of transportation investmerits and include these types ofprojects in the
comprehensive 20-year transportation list.
m In its functional classification,the city has designated street subcategories of"urban"and"rustic"
collectors and local residential streets,which reflect differing standards and abilityto accommodate
nonmotorized facilities. The map of the street classifications doesn't provide detail on which streets
are classified as".u..rban"or"rustic," The city should consider mapping this street classification or
providing a description of where these facilities are located.
s The plan notes that a sidewalk inveniory was developed in 2U05 and updated in 2008 to account for
recent annexations. The inventory should b.e updated to depict current conditions,parCicularly given
�
ORD:E Page 535 of 751
that the plan mentions several recent nonmotorized improvemepts. 1Nlore information about
developing inventories can 6e found in the Department of Commerce traus�ortatiou �:uidebi�o(:,
Chapter 4C.
• As called for in VISION 2040(DP-Action-18),the city should include mode split goals for the
iegional growth center. PSRC recently produced sid��itio�i<.il guidance about setting mode split goals
that the city may find helpful in this work:
• Policy Funding=08 calls for reassess'ing the land use element if funding is insufficient to maintain
adopted level of se.rvice standards. There are several.additional reasse5sment strategies beyond
revising the land use element that the city could consider in event ofa funding short:fall. The WAC
(365-196-430)also recommends cons.idering addition.al funding for improvements,adjusting leVel qf
seryice standards,revisiting identified needs;and utilization of transportation.demand management
strategies.
• The city is commended for including in the plan a 20-year list of transportation projects,along with
general discussion of financing approaches. The plan should include more detail on the multiyear
f nancing plan for needed transportation improvements,including an analysis of probable funding
adequacy for projects and programs identified in the transportation element for the planning
period.Further guidance on how to address the financial analysis in your plan can be found in RCW
36.70A.070,WAC 365-196-430,and the Department of Commerce ti�an5pi>i�tati<>n guicleboc�k.
• The Core Comprehensive Plan includes a discussion of capacity and growth targets assigned to the.
city. Review of the draft noted se�eral minor discrepancies in the table and description. The city
should review the assessment to ensure that it is using accurate and consistent targets and capacity
inforriiation from both counties. PSRC staff are available to provide technical assistance as needed.
PSRC has resources available to assist the city in addressing these comments.Additional resources related to
the plan review process can also be found at http:li�vwG��.psrc.org��ro�vth%plaureviewire�aurc�s/.
Thank you again for working with us through the plan review process. There is a lot of strong work in the
draft and we are available to continue to provide assistance and additional reviews as the plan moves through
the development process. If you have questions or need additional information regarding the review of local
plans or the certification process,please contact me at 206-464-6174 or LC1ncler��;��od-Eiultinann(i;p;rc.org..
Sincerely,
�u"�..�,� _��.-_
Liz Underwood-Bultmann
___ _
Associate Planner,Growth Management Plarining
cc; Review Teain,Growth Management Services,Department of Commerce
2
ORD.E Page 536 of 751
€
�, P�blic ��mr���nt #��- j
i
� E
�
f
.. � �t�LIS � NC� j
C�EVE��9�I� E��" �
cv�ns���rtiun� � � �� � `
Memhers: i
k{4C's AEfordabte Nous?ng I
Nov�mber 3, �d I S �,3w=mcame rior,sinp''�rgan�zatiU��s
Cr�r�munity Dsve4c��;enY
City of Auburn Plann'ing Coi�tr►�isslon � :�,�����att�r,s � �
City of Atiiburn � � ��eC,�g"�o����ii5t`�g �
25� W Main Street � ° ��°��'��"���
AUbUTIl� �t� 98�a 1 � �� f�:�blic i'cusin�Au�k��t�Ues �
i
,.
,_ r��i1n1U51t1'j�r�C�.fS1n.�1P�8:1C185`
RE: Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Update ,�4o,kf�,_�y�������rg°"'�"�"�
publie 4evelar;�grt Aidho��iias
DOST COTT1I711SSlQtI MeTTlbf'.TS, �,vvern;��rt Aee+�r ies.and
�min°�sions :
On belialf of the Housin� Developm�nt Go►lso�rtium of King County ('HI?C), t �«,;,�E�t,�»�����n���s�� ��
fhank you for this�ppartu.nity to comment on your Comprehensive Plan Housing p�,}�,��,S1e11-sa����r�tS �
E1�exne�lt update. � � � �
{;a.rE;,Qd Pu�a�ic*Accou�i+.aia�s
. R��,�n�i Fund2r an�isnders �
HDC is a uonprafit membersllip organiLation which represents more than 100 � ,, ��e,s
� Nafionai Fu.�.''a,�rs a�»�"' I
private businesses, n�nprofit�rganizations, and public partners �vha are�vorking ,� ,z+,s� '
to develop affordable llousing and pr�vide housing-related servie�s in King Ca�:�`�"",`y'`�"�5i"'����� '
County. KDC s mernbe�s a�e�ledicated ta the visio��tltc�t all people shoulcl bc� p���°rrv"'��``a��`S� � `
�
�rble to li�i=i� in c�safe, laeczlthy�, and a�of•dable h�me in a commtrnity of opport�trzity. •,���F��t����_ � �
In other�vords, we believe all people,regardless of income, deserve the �:��t,aCcu�� �'
opportunity to thrive in a safe neighborh�od with good jobs, quality schools, and f
strc�nb access to trai�sit.
We very inuch a�preciate Auburn's �vork to�vard achieving this vision, for ;
example, through your support of permanent supportive housing developmenls j
like Valley Cities Lanc�ing. This C�mprehensive P{an�:rpdate provides you an - �
ideal opportunity to explore what other strategies are neeessary to create an �
inclusive and affordable comxnunity for all of,Auburn':s residents.�To that end, we � � � �
would like tc� provide the following comments to help�iide your Housiii� �
Element��•ork an tlie issues of: healthy housing, development incentives, and �
1
very-low income housing:
❖ Healthv Housin�t Preservin�Auburn's E:cistin�Affc�rdable Housing : i
As you kn��v, Auburn has a robust stock of unsubsidized h�using that is naturally i
affordable in the private inarket; Preserviilg the quality and affordability of
i
� � � � �t_�;
_� `�.f.for�firi�'fJ�l�or���. �
;��� �,:i�, tty
��� �e. �
�"?�� `>��3�il:f � �� � .
-'��h S li±ti'('t�j.r1�'?Cl i
ORD.E�� �
� { n ��gt��.,��7 of 751
`l..i:C;.%'..�,�ii:i ��:,� .�c:.:i23 +i�6�3 t. N.itiit;,lit�� �
i
existing homes is one af the b.est ways to ensure Auburn families can afford a place to live.
Housing rehabilitation prornotes vibrant neighborhoocts and improves health outcomes,making it
easier for Auburn's residents to thrive. The City's housing needs assessment reports the housing
stock to be in fair or poor condition, and maintenance and rehabilitation needs will grow over
time without signiFicant reirivestment. If rental property owners and homeowners]ack the
funding necessary to maintain their homes,residents° health may be severely impacted by
housing liealth and safety hazards.These conditions include mold,pests, injury hazards, and
poor indoor air quality. '
;
We applaud the policies in your Draft Housing Element that address safe neighborhoods, healthy
housing, and housing preservation, including policies H-7, H-20, H-21, and H-22. We are
excited to see policies related ta loans for rehabilitation as well as the exploration of a
multifamily rerital inspection program. We encourage you to incorporate additional details into
your Housing Element to ensure these programs explicitly benefit low iricome households. As
one exainple, whenever public funds are used to sugport rehabilitation, yau could require some
units to be affordable and available to households af 60%AMI or below through a policy that
states: "Ensure that housing created or preserved using local public resources or by regulation
benefits low-income households and retains its affordability over time."
In HDC's reeent report,.l�at•r��;ir�<�Il��crlil�. crr;cl�lntlsr.ra�T iti ,Sc?crtla.I�iat�r C`t�t.c,�h', we explore some
emerging pro�ams ancl polieies to support tlle health and preservation of South King County's
housing stoek. For example,community health workers can educate residents about health
outcomes from housing conditions and connect them to the appropriate programs and resources
far home improvements:Another strategy—a Property Tax Exemption for Housing .
Preservation—can incentivize private landlords to repair buildings c�n�l ensure affordability of
some rehabilitated units. We strongly encourage you to explore incarporating these strategies
into H-20, H-21,or H-22 through implementation steps sueh as: "Support additional he�lthy
housing and preservation strategies; such as community health workers and a preservation
property tax exemption, to preserve affardable housing opportunities and offer property owners
and residents the educafion and resources needed to maintain housing."
•:� Development Incentives: CreaYiri�Communities of.Qpporfunity
As Auburn works to cieate mixed-use development in neighborhoods with close prorimity to
transit;jobs,services and other opportunities, we encourage you to explore strategies which ;
could help ensure sorne of tl�is housing is affordable. If low and moderate-iricome residents can
afford to live in communities of opportunity, they won't be forced to stretch their budgets so far ;
on things like gas and high-priced groceries at convenience stores. Development incentives ;
would make it easier for Auburn's lower-income families to afford opportunity-rich �
neighborhoods.
We therefore ask that the City include policies in its Housing Element thai promote the use-of
development inceritives for affordable housing.The City can use developmerit incentives like '
reduced parking standards, fee waivers, tax exemptians; and density bonuses to help ensure
affordatiility where new development occurs. By implementing these types of policies in serviee
of affordability,tl�e City can leverage the power of the private market to create quality,
affordable housing and promote economic development with very limited public investment. �;
�
ORD.E Page 538 of 751 ;
HDG suggests the following language to incorporate development incentives into Auburn's
Housing Elernent: "Explore the use of density bnnuses, parking reductions, multi-family tax
exem.ptions,fee waivers and exemptions; and pennit expediting to encourage the development of
housing affordable at below market-rate."
Research shows that low-income residents living near transit are less likely to own vehicles tllan
higher income households living iin transit nodes. Promoting affordable housin�near transit can
help reduce carbon emissions and increase aetive modes of transportation and physical activity.
In order to ensure safety and connectivity, we encourage you tn add detail to policy A 3 to
"invest in transportation improvements that will create safe neighborhoods for walking, biking;
a.nd eonnect'ing to transit." .
❖ Very-Low_Income Housin�:.Addressin�Homelessness&Meeting Cominunity Needs
Children deserve a chance to succeed in school and.in life; which all begins with tlieir family .
being able to afford a decent place to live: Unfortunately, family homelessness is very real in
South King Caunty. During the 2013-2014 school year, the Auburn Schoal Districted reported
208 homeless students.This crisis has severe, system-wide impacts, affecting physical health,
educational outcomes, and psycholo�ical well-being. By ensuring that these students llave a safe,
healthy place to came home to everyday, we can begin to hridge the achievement gap and ,
stabilize families. We ericourage you to consider a pnlicy in your Housing Element that
recognizes and addresses horrielessness, s�.tch as: "Work with other jurisdictions anci health and
social service organizations to impleirient a coordinated, regional approach to homelessness."
One of the best ways to prevent homelessness is to ensure quality, pennanently affordable
housing for very-low income households. We very much appreciate Auburn's attention to the
county�vide Planning Policies (CPPs)and the recognition that addressing the countywide need
for housing affordable to very-lo�v income households will require efforts by all jurisdictions
working individually and coilectively. Along these lines, we also appreciate the Housing '
Element's Partnership and 1Vlonitoring policies, which will go a lang way toward addressing ,
the Counfywide need for very-low, low-, and moderate-incame housing. �
That said, we urge you to add detaiT to Policy H-26 and the Housing Objectives and Tools chart ;
related to the need for very-low income housing in Auburn. A policy to this end could state: "Act
as a Gounty leader in the exploration and implementation of new funding mechanisms and
strategies to develop housing affordable at 30% AMI and below across King County and
throughout South King County." ,
Althou�r Auburn's housing stock is relatively affordable,many residents still struggle
tremendously to afford housing. In fact, 28% of Aubuc-n's renters are paying over half of their
incnme iri housing costs, eompared to 21% in King Gounty overall and 23% in Pierce County
overall. We erieourage you to incarporate this data into your Housing Conditions and Trends
Summary to provide a more complete portrait of coininunity housing need within the Housing
Element. Auburn can further plan for very-low incoine housin�needs through"support of ;
nonproEit organizations during all stages of siting and project planning and when applying for
county, state, and federal funciing."
3
ORD:E Page 539 of 751
We believe it is possible for all hardworking families in Auburn to afford housing and stil] have
enou�h money left over for the basics like groceries,gas,medieine, and childcare. We applaud
your attention to.the needs of households across the income spectrum and encourage you to
strengthen your Housing Element by implementing the policy and implementation language
suggested above.
Thank you for your consideration. We at H.DC look forward to working with you as you
eontinue to updaie your Comprellensive Plan and would be happy to discuss these comments
with you further. We can be reached by phone at(206) 682-9541 or b.y email at
11Jcrii�l��7usin.S,cc>t��c�rtiunl.t��•<�. We hope you will contact us with any questions.
Best,
�� ���
�'�
Kayla Schott-Bresler Kelly i er
Policy 1Vlanager Policy Director
i
�
;
I,
i
ii
4
ORD.E Page 540 of 751
Public Co�ment#�
P�get Sour�d Regional Counc�l
i - . _
November 12;2015
Jeff Tate,Deputy Ditector
City of Auburn Community Development Services
25 W Main Street
Auburn,WA 98001
Subject: PSRC comments on draft Auburn Comprehensive Plan update–Additional Elements
Dear Jeff,
Thank you for providing an opportuniry for the Puget Sound Regional Council to review draft elements ofthe
..
City of Auburn 2015 Coinprehensive Plan.We recognize the substantial amount of time and effort invested in
this plan and appreciate the cliance to review it wHile in draft form,This timely collaboration helps to ensure
ce.rtifcation requ.ireme.nts are adequately addressed and certification action can be taken by PSRC boards ugon
adoption: This letter follows correspondence dated November 3,2015 on the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan and Core Plan documents. This letter addresses all remaining plan elements,including land use,housing,
capital facilities,utilities,economic development,parks,and related apgendices..
We would like to note the many outstanding aspects of the draft plan elements that serve to implement
VISION 2040. Several particularly noteworthy aspects include:
• Emphasis in the housing element on special needs housing,liealthy housing�human seryices,and
preservation of affordable housing.
o A comprehensiye housing needs assessment,which includes an excellent data assessment as well as
targeted demographic outreach through interviews and focus groups to provide a clearer
understanding of community housing needs.
• Inclusion of a greenhouse gas inventory that provides a baseline assessment and forecast of emissions
in the City of Auburn.
• A Health Impact Assessment of the comprehensive plan—the first of its kind in the region—which
provides valuable perspective on approaches to health and wellness in the plan.
• Complefion of an updated Airport Master Plan for Aubum Municipal Airport,which provides
important information on airport oper"ations as well as airport compatible land use and zoning. I
The draft corriprehensive plan elements advance regional policy in many important ways.There are a few
items,however,that should be addressed before the plan is finalized;
• MPF-DP-3 calls for jurisdictions with designated regional growth centers to include housing and
employment targets for growth in the centers planned for over the next 20 years. PSRC recently
produced ac�ditional �uidancL about setting center targets that the city may find helpful in this work.
� VISION 2040 calls for all unincorporated lands within the urban growth area to transition into cities
and assumes this transition to be largely complete by 2040.The draft plan includes policies addressing
boundaries and affiliafion of these areas. In addition,the city should corisider incorporating policies
and provisions that address the orderly transition of remaining unincorporated areas to city
governance,such as by working with the counties on coordinating development standards;transferring
pernutting authority,and addressing service and infrastructure financing.
• MPP-En-20 25 in VISION 2040 arid the strategies in Transportafion 2040 call for reducing
greenhouse gas erriissions and adapting to impacts related to climate change.S.ee page 42 of�'IStON
2i14f)for an ove.rview of climate change and related policie.s and page 34 in'I'rans��ort�itian 2t)=�f)for
information on the four-part greenhouse gas reduction strategy(land use,user fees,choices,and
technology).The draft comprehensive plan addresaes these policies in a number of ways,most notably
through inclusion of a greenhouse gas inventory for the City of Auburn.The plan includes policies
1
ORD.E Page 541 of 751
that support actions that would contribute to reduction in greenhouse gases,such as providing
alternatives to single occupant vehicle traveL However,the plan should be strengthened by adding
policies on climate change and policies and provisions tliat support additional strategies such as
emissions reductions from municipal operations and additional transpoitation demand riianagement
sfrategies(MPP-En-24);Helpful information on identi.fying emissioris-reducing strategies can be
found in the GVashii�gton St;�te;C'(irnate Chan�e I�e;ources, ��'ashingtc�n State Int_et�rated t;lin�ate
C;hartge }2espc>nse Stra[e;gy,and PSRG t'limatc C;han�e.]nfc:�rmatiou.
o VISION 2040 contains policies in several areas that promote energy-efficient building,energy
conservation,renewable energy,and alternative energy sources(MPP-DP-49,MPP-PS-12-13;MPP-
En-21 23;MPP-T-6).While the draft plan has policies to promote conservation of water,it would be
strengthened by adding policies to address energy,as well as environmentally friendly and energy-
efficient building.
PSRC has resources available to assist the city in addressing these comments,Additional re.sources related to
the plan review process can also be found at http:/i���w�y.psrc.org,%��rrowth/pl<inreview/resow c.cs%.
Thank you again for working with us through the plan review process. There is a lot of sirong work in the
draft and we are available to continue to provide assistance and additional reviews as the plan moves through
the development process. If you have questions or need addirional information regarding the review of local
plans or the certification process,please contact rrie at 206-464-6174 or I.:Undenv<�od-E3ultmat�n�a),psrc.or�r.
Sincerely,
�u"�� -��
�
Liz Underwood-Bultmann
_ - _. _
Associate Planner,Growth Management Planning
cc: Review Team,Growth Management Services,Department of Commerce
2
ORD:E Page 542 of 751
From: Jeff Tate
To: Tina Kriss
Subject: FW:Core section of Co.mp Plan
D.ate: Friday,November 20,2015 11:44:02 AM
Comment#6
F'�abli� ��imr�ent ��6
_ _.____ _� ....� ....___ ___ . __ �... ___ _ _._..� _. _ �. _._.... . _.. .._� .
From. Pete Beaupain [mailto:pbeaupain@comcast.net]
Sent: Thw�sday, Noyember 19, 2015 7:52 PM
To: Jeff Tate
Subject: Core section of Comp Plan
I have finished looking it over. There are a bunch of small suggestions/typos/comments marked in
it. I plan to mail it to you an,d trust yqu to find the right person to take it to. I hope you don't mind
being my emissary.
I do appreciate your help in getfing itto me. And your willingness to be a little whi:msical while
in.teracting with me: To me, it is a LOT more bearable to do work like this when I can putsomefun
into it.
Regarding reviewing any other sections, I think I won't. I haye some.other do-gooder projects I am
working on,and they need some attention.
Overall; I think the Comp Plan has a very positive,forward-looking attitude. If the City is able to
actually accomplish even a quarterof it, I think the whgle poPulace will be significantly better off. I
wish you well in the effort. It is you people in the staff positions who will provide the continuity
among changing mayoral and council elecfion-winners. Regarding the current mayor and council, I
thinK they are a really good group who genuinely want to make Auburn a better place. I hope it
seems the same way to you folks who work with them dai.ly. I am not going to ask you to comment
about that, however.
One other thing: whom should I talk(or email) with to learn more about the proposed
homelessness project?
And, as a wrapup, here are some general thoughts about the Comp Plan stuff I reviewed.
1. The proposed land use policies on Page 33 seem like a large burden to place on
de�elopers; I fear the policies wiU scare developers away to nearby cities which have less
draconian desires. I suggest that these plans be discussed with some developers before i
being set in concrete. '
2. Unless sidewalks get designated as"trails" in many areas, I think that acpuiring rights of
w. a.y for trails will be difficult in areas that are already developed because the land is
already owned and occupied. Can eminent d.omain be used,to acquire trail rights of way?
Would you even want to do that? It could make you a lot of enemies. On the brighter side,
I have heard of many instances in which landowners originally were strongly opposed to I
trails but found them to be beneficial after they were in place and in use. Some of my
ORD.E Page 543 of 751
other activities are with trails groups, and I encounter this kind of info.
3, There is a lot of emphasis in the Comp Plan on pedestrian and bicycle transportation (I
think skating should also be considered). I think that'is a great idea. Howeve.r,tra.il
eti.quette MUST be strongly emphasized on these trails. Keeping fast-moving bicycles and
skaters from startling or hitting pedestrians has to be a powerful concern. In particular, it
has been my experience that getting bicyclists to warn people when they are approaching
from behind is VERY difficult.
4. Regarding the Sustainable goal in the Transportation Element(Page 47), my only comment
is, Dream on,dream on,Teenage Queen!
That's enough. I have other things to do. And I really would like to converse with someone about
the homelessness project.
Pete B.
ORD.E Page 544 of 751
� Pubiic Cc�rr�ment #7
November 19, 2015 VIA Email
Jeff Tate
City of Auburn
Dear Mr. Tate,
This letter is in response for comment regarding the Drnft Proposal of Comprehensive
Land Use Plnn. Don Smnll & Sons Oil has been in Auburn at the current locafion since the 1960's,
as well as the property use has also been the snme when the parcel was owned by Union Oil since
the early 1900's. The campany nnd its locations are an asset to the Gity. We provide needed
products, services and jobs. The company is ndding vnlue to the City tax base via sales tax
revenue, b&o tax and property taxes; We have the abifity to keep all agencies in aperoti.on in the
event of power failure; we are a designated Emergency Responder for temporary power
generntors, henting oil and fuel far farms. We have the sfordge tapacity to sustain the power
for u longer duration in the event of need and hnve the only legal place to transfer fwels from
Seattle to Tacama. �
Since the city daesn't directly notify property owners of potential changes to the
property use per the proposed comprehensive Innd use plan, after review of the drnft document
there are several potenfidl changes that cause us concern. Our existing use of the land today is
the same as the historical use. We wish to maintain our zoning M-1 status thereby continuing our
business legally without being non-conforming to these comprehensive plan chnnges. These
properties are in the border aren fram the BN track East to A St NW and North of lsf St NW #o
3�d NW.
Additionally, another location located on C St, North of 3�d, W of the BN trncks also is in a
zone that the current use would be non-conforming. This location was the first to invest in the
installation of dispensing an niternative fuel for automobile use, which is dn expanding ma�ket.
We also have 2 locations; 210 W Main nnd 520 E Mnin that are in the Downtown designntion.
These locntions are neighborhood commercial businesses and should be considered a permitted
usnge. Another locatign 5550 Auburn Way 5. is not in the Downtown designotion nnd is a
Neighborhood commercial.business but its Iand use will chnnge to residentinl per the review of
the draft mnp.
We appreciute your consideration of our land use change concerns. Thank you.
ORD.E Page 545 of 751
_ _. _. _ _ _... ___._-- . _
Respectf ully,
Stephen J: Small
President
Cc: Hanorable Mayor Nancy Backus
ORD.E Page 546 of 751