Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6280 Exhibit "C" Comprehensive Water Plan City of Auburn COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN APPENDICES December 2009 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A - Determination of Non-Significance and SEPA Checklist Appendix B - Agency Comment Letters and Responses Appendix C - Ordinances and Approvals (to be inserted at a later date) Appendix D - Disposition of 2001 Capital Improvement Program Appendix E - Interlocal Agreements Appendix F - Projected Population, ADD, and MDD Appendix G - Design & Construction Standards Appendix H - Facility Conditions Assessment Appendix I - Water Rights Certificates Appendix J - Water Shortage Emergency Response Plan Appendix K - Well Head Protection Report Appendix L - Water Quality Monitoring Plan Appendix M - Attachment 9 of the Municipal Water Law Appendix N - Distribution System Cost Estimates Appendix O - Public Works Emergency Response Program TOC Appendix P - Cross Connection Control Program Appendix A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND SEPA CHECKLIST Appendix B AGENCY COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES 1 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. 1 Sec ES.4 Par 5 Water Requirements PWC Revise "give" to 'sell" in reference to water delivered to CWD Change was made. 2 Sec ES.6 Par 4 Water Reuse PWC Revise "King County" to "other agencies"Change was made to read "Reclaimed water is a potential source of supply. Depending on the degree to which reclaimed water is treated, potential uses include irrigation, landscape purposes, manufacturing, industrial operations, and aquifer recharge. This plan proposes that the City conduct a reclaimed water evaluation and participate in future local and regional planning for wastewater reuse." 3 Sec 2.4.2 Par 2 Bonney Lake PWC Add the number of COA accounts served by Bonney Lake Change was made to read "Currently, Bonney Lake provides water to approximately 1,773 City of Auburn customers." 4 Sec 2.4.6 Par 4 Covington Water District PWC Add text regarding Cascade Water Alliance opportunities available other than the Second Supply Pipeline Change was made. Text was added to read "The CWD maintains three interties with the Cedar River Water and Sewer District, which in turn purchases water from the City of Seattle, and one emergency intertie with WD#111. The CWD is also participating in the Cascade Water Alliance. 5 Sec 2.5 Other Class A Water Systems PWC Add text regarding Class B and private wells, and City encouragement to connect to City. Change was made. The section was retitled "Other Water Systems" and reference to Class B systems and private wells was added, as well as "The City encourages other systems within the City RWSA to connect to Auburn's system." 6 Sec 2.7 Emergency Interties PWC Add emergency water quantity limits.No change needed. There are no specified quantity limits for emergency water. 7 Sec 3.1 Par 4 Introduction PWC Check quote Change will be made in final Plan. City 2007-2008 Budget Mission Statement reads "within Auburn's service area" and text will be revised accordingly. 8 Sec 3.2.8 Service Extension PWC Add reference to the use of master meters.Change was made. Text added to read "All properties shall be metered. Master meters will be evaluated and determined on a case by case basis." 9 Sec 3.3.6 Demand Management and Water Shortage Response PWC Add penalty for Stage I, II, III shortage response violations; specify Stage IV penalty. Change was made. Text added to read "It is in the public interest to promote the conservation of the city's water supply in order to protect the health, welfare, and safety of water users. To accomplish this declared purpose, the City reserves the right to exercise its powers through emergency measures. Penalties for violations of this power are addressed in the City Code. [13.14.060]" 10 Sec 3.6.1 Water Supply Planning PWC Check reference to "Puget Sound Regional Planning Council" Change will be made in final Plan. Text will be revised to "Puget Sound Regional Council" 11 Sec 3.3.6 Par 5 Demand Management and Water Shortage Response Stage IV PCDC Recommend that a warning be issued prior to Stage IV declaration. No change needed. Each previous Stage I, II, and IV provides information on potential future stages. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 2 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 12 Sec 3.6.12 Reservoir Sizing PWC Does emergency storage include interties and is the volume of storage a Department of Health requirement? No change needed. The emergency storage component of reservoir sizing does not include emergency interties. 13 Sec 3.6.12 Reservoir Sizing PWC Is emergency storage volume determined by City of Auburn or mandated by Department of Health? No change needed. There are minimum storage requirements set by Department of Health (DOH). DOH has recommended minimum criteria. COA calculates emergency storage differently resulting in a more conservative approach than DOH recommendations to better account for unique aspects of the City's water system. 14 Sec 3.10.4 Development Changes PWC Do bulleted items accurately reflect Capital Facility Plan Policy? No change needed. Yes 15 Sec 4.2.2 Par 3 Wholesale Customers PWC Revise "give 2.5" to "sell 2.5"Change was made. Text revised to read "sell". 16 Sec 5.6.3.1 Table 5.7 Valley Storage Analysis PWC Should the reliable source capacity volumes change for the years 2014 and 2028? No change needed. The reliable capacity volumes shown is Table 5.7 reflect conditions without any improvements completed. Table 5.12 shows reliable capacity volumes with projects completed as proposed in the Capital Improvements Program. 17 Sec 6.7.4 Water Reuse PWC Add references to irrigation and recharge.Change was made. Text revised to address irrigation and recharge. 18 Sec 8.2.3 Par 4 Water Use Efficiency, New Program Measures PWC Add a new program measure for "other high users."Change was made. Added "Other High Users-The City will evaluate the high volume users for water saving opportunities." 19 Sec 9.5 Model Maintenance Recommendations PWC Revise "updated annually" to "updated periodically."Change was made. Text revised to "updated periodically depending on system changes." 20 Sec 10.3.2 Table 10.2 Storage Improvement Projects PWC Does project R-01 Lakeland Hills Reservoir painting involve cost sharing with Algona or Pacific? No change needed. No, this is a maintenance project. 21 Sec 11.3.1 Utility Fund Structure FCSG Delete account number references. See email dated 8-18- 09 Change was made. 22 Sec 10.3 Figure 10.3 Project PS-04 PW Project PS-04 should be located at the Lea Hill reservoir site, not at the bottom of the hill Change will be made in the final Plan. 23 N/A Pacific The review has determined that retail service between the City of Pacific and City of Auburn is consistent with our understanding of the boundary. The emergency intertie to provide the City of Pacific is consistent with our records No change needed. 24 Sec ES.3 Table ES.1 Pipe Velocity LUD Within Table ES.1, pipe velocity for transmission mains is noted as 8 ft/s. This seems high for large diameter pipe; past Auburn practice was to use 5 ft/sec for designing transmission mains. Comment noted. No change will be made. 3 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 25 ES.5 Existing System LUD Executive Summary Page ES-9: Within Figure ES.3, the two intertie symbols for Lakehaven Utility District are shown in the wrong location. 1. Future Interties should be located at 15th Street NW & Terrace Drive. 2. Existing Intertie located at Aaby Drive & Knickerbocker Drive Change will be made in the final Plan. 26 TOC Definition Page LUD Definition Page xii: ccf should read 100 cubic-feet Change will be made in the final Plan. 27 Chapter 1 Acknowledgement LUD Introduction Page 1-3: Under, 1.8 Acknowledgements, Utilities Engineer is misspelled. Change will be made in the final Plan. 28 Sec 2.4.7 Lakehaven Utility District LUD Section 2, 2.4.7 Lakehaven Utility District, Page 2-12: You may want to update this section to indicate that Lakehaven Utility District has completed a second feed to this West Hill area via an 8-inch pipeline within Hi-Crest Drive (2009) and has decommissioned the Aaby Drive pump station (2009). Change will be made in the final Plan. 29 Sec 2.7.4 Lakehaven Utility District LUD Section 2, 2.7.4. Lakehaven Utility District, Page 2-16: Refer to 2.4.7 comment above. Change will be made in the final Plan. 30 Sec 2.9 Inventory of Related Studies LUD Section 2, 2.9 Inventory of Related Studies, Page 2-20: Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Plan should be identified with the year 2008. Change will be made in the final Plan. 31 Sec 5.2.1.1 Valley Service Area LUD Section 5, 5.2.1.1 Valley Service Area, Page 5-2: “There are active interties in the Valley Service Are to Algona, as well as emergency interties to Pacific, Lakehaven and Kent.” This statement from the Auburn 2009 Comp Plan could be misleading due to the fact that there is no physical connection at this time between Lakehaven and Auburn at the 15th Street NW and Terrace Drive location, and the power to the intertie at the Aaby Drive pump station has been disconnected (2009). Change will be made in the final Plan. Text will be modified to clarify interties with purveyors. 32 Sec 5.4.1.11 Braunwood Well LUD Section 5, 5.4.1.11 Braunwood well, Page 5-24: In 2004, the Braunwood well was redeveloped and refurbished with a new 20 GPM submersible pump. Change will be made in the final Plan. 33 Sec 5.4.2.1 Coal Creek Springs LUD Section 5, 5.4.2.1 Coal Creek Springs, Page 5-24: In 2003, the middle collector manholes were modified/upgraded with new aluminum security access hatches. Change will be made in the final Plan. 34 Sec 5.4.2.4 Wells 2 & 6 LUD Section 5, 5.4.2.4 Wells 2 & 6, Page 5-25: In 2003, Well 2 was rehabbed (packer was repaired). Well 6 was rehabbed in 2004 (double inner casing was installed). Both had sand infiltration problems. Consultant was Robinson-Noble & Saltbush. Comment noted. No change will be made. 4 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 35 Sec 5.4.2.9 Well 5B LUD Section 5, 5.4.2.9 Well 5B, Page 5-26: In 2006, a flow control valve was installed to restrict the well production in an attempt to reduce well draw down. Comment noted. No change will be made. 36 Sec 5.5.2.5 Intertie/Lea Hill Booster Pump Station LUD Section 5, 5.5.2.5 Intertie/Lea Hill Booster Pump station, Page 5-32: In 2005, station was upgraded with two 150 GPM and one 1500 GPM pumps to meet domestic and fire flow flows with the upper Lea Hill pressure zone. Comment noted. No change will be made. 37 Sec 6.5.2 Emergency Interties LUD Section 6, 6.5.2 Emergency Interties – 4. Lakehaven utility District, Page 6-9: Refer to 5.2.1.1 Valley Service Are comment above. Comment noted. No change will be made. 38 Chapter 2 Page 2-1 RWSA Pierce Chapter 2 RWSA Page 2-1: Please indicate that the Retail Water Service Area (RWSA) boundary is considered the designated Pierce County CWSP water service area (WSA) boundary. Change will be made in the final Plan. 39 Chapter 2 Page 2-1 RWSA Pierce Chapter 2 RWSA, Page 2-1: The County has signed a Standard Service Agreement (SSA) with Auburn dated 09- 16-1997 (reference R#2873 dated 09-15-09). However, the claimed RWSA does not match what the County has on record nor the RWSA boundary depicted in Figure 2.1. Please provide a new signed SSA with a map (no larger than 11” x 17” in size) that depicts the RWSA, as correlated to the tax parcel base, within Pierce County (see Attachment A). Please add text to reference signed Standard Service Agreements with Pierce County. Please include these documents in an appendix. Change will be made in the final Plan. A new SSA will be prepared and executed. 40 Chapter 2 Page 2-1 RWSA Pierce Chapter 2 RWSA, Page 2-1: In addition, the electronic version of the RWSA you submitted does not appear to match the tax parcel boundaries or those of adjacent purveyors (see Attachment B – we show your RWSA in purple and you show in hatch marks). This may be caused by a data shift? Please correct this discrepancy in the final submitted SSA map. No change will be made. The City of Auburn and City of Bonney Lake water service boundary was negotiated prior to the development of these parcels. In 2010, the City of Auburn will coordinate with the City of Bonney Lake for a new service area boundary to match the tax parcel boundaries. 41 Chapter 2 Pages 1.7-1.10 Inventory of Related Studies Pierce Chapter 2 Inventory of Related Studies, Pages 1.7 – 1.10: Please add a reference to the Pierce County Coordinated Water System Plan, adopted 09-23-03 by Ord. 2003-69. Change will be made in the final Plan. 5 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 42 Sec 2.2 Retail Water Service Area King The second paragraph states the current boundaries of the retail water service area (RWSA) match those established in the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) with on exception. The paragraph then goes on to list several interlocal agreements and therein is our confusion. If the RWSA is the same as within the CWSP except for a portion of Pierce County (an area south of the City), why are interlocal agreements with Kent and King County Water District 111 listed? Given those jurisdictions are north of the City, they have nothing to do with Pierce County. do the interlocal agreements identified with Lakehaven, City of Kent, or King County Water District 111 change the respective service areas identified in the CWSP? See also the second paragraph on page 2-7 and/or the last paragraph of section 2.4.3 that talks about modified service areas with King County Water District 111. Change will be made in the final Plan. Text will be revised and expanded to clarify the City of Auburn RWSA boundaries with King and Pierce Counties. 43 Sec 2.4.3 RWSA King The last sentence of the second paragraph is confusing. The sentence states that, "The City serves outside its RWSA as a result of the division of WD 87 until such time as Kent system expands." Our understanding is that the retail service area defined or demarcated in a water system plan must include where the City currently serves water. Please clarify the retail service area for the City. Comment noted. No change will be made. The City of Auburn has not expanded their service area. The City is assisting Kent on an interim basis with providing water to this area. 44 -Unincorporated King County King it would be helpful to identify those portions of unincorporated King County served by the City on one of the maps, perhaps Figure 2.1 or perhaps ES.2 Comment noted. No change will be made unless required by Department of Health. 6 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 45 Sec 2.9 Inventory of Related Studies King To your list, please add the 2006 King county Flood Hazard Management Plan. For that plan, we encourage the City, as you have probably now done because of the Howard Hanson situation, to talk about the relationship of the City water system to floodplain management programs such as the Regional Flood Warning Center and emergency response, public education and outreach programs. The salmon recovery plan, especially the chapter for the Green River basin, seems to be very applicable for the City as it considers new source development. For example, whether planned development of new sources of supply may be constrained by potential adverse effects on streamflows of habitat for listed species, and plans for mitigation or avoiding impacts. Comment noted. No change will be made. Emergency operations for the water system, whether in response to flood conditions or other hazard, are discussed in Chapter 12 - Operations and Maintenance and have been developed as part of the Public Works Emergency Response Manual. The City recognizes that any new source development would need to consider potential adverse impacts to stream flows. 46 Sec 3.1 Policies and Criteria for Water Service King The second paragraph, second sentence, states, "The City may develop criteria and standards for satellite systems that differ from those developed for the City's multi-source municipal water system." We encourage you to develop any criteria and standards for satellite systems that differ from those developed for the City's multi-source municipal water system and state them in the Plan. As you know, there are currently numerous smaller Group A and Group B public water systems within the city's service area. If those systems are not able to provide adequate, potable water, the CWSP policies call for Auburn to provide service. It seems prudent to put in place now the framework to create predictability for small systems and enable the City to provide satellite or remote service. Change will be made in the final Plan. In the second paragraph, the first sentence will be revised to read "The policies included in this plan are developed specifically for the City's multi-source municipal water system (System Number 03350V)." and the second sentence will be deleted. 7 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 47 Sec 3.2.1 Retail Service Area King This section is a bit confusing with the use of the terms firm and no-firm customer. It is our understanding that the City has a duty to serve all customers with in the RWSA. Please clarify what a firm or non-firm customer is and how you can have customers within the RWSA and not have a duty to provide water. Change will be made in the final Plan. Section 3.2.1 will be retitled "Retail Water Service Area". Reference to the Pierce County Coordinated Water System Plan will be added to the first sentence. The third sentence and remainder of this paragraph will be moved to section 3.6.1 Water Supply Planning, as the second paragraph, to read "The City will plan for and provide water service to all firm customers. Firm customers are those customers within the RWSA and wholesale customers to whom the City is obligated to provide an uninterruptible supply of water. As supply permits, the City may provide water to non-firm customers unilaterally or as part of a capital improvement partnership agreement. Provision of water service should be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Auburn Water Comprehensive Plan." 48 Sec 3.2.4 Potential Annexation Areas King Language in 3.2.4, first bullet, that says "(in the event of significant conflict between county and City requirements, the City may choose to not extend utility services)." What conflict between county and City requirements may compel the City to not extend utility service? I suggest that if conflicts exist we should resolve them now to the extent we can to ensure the City will extend utility service in the RWSA. Comment noted. No change will be made. This statement is in accordance with the City Comprehensive Plan. The City will work to resolve any conflicts which may arise. 49 3.2.5 Conditions of Service King Also potentially problematic is the first sentence of 3.2.5 that reads, "for areas outside the current City limits, but within the RWSA, the City shall condition service on agreement that development is in compliance with City standards." As you probably know, there are at least two unincorporated areas within the RWSA and not within the PAA (very northwest corner and in the center of the City, eastside, west of Covington Water District and east of the City limit) and it seems problematic to say that development will be in compliance with City standards for development in the County. Why and how would the City impose its development standards for areas in unincorporated King County? Change will be made in the final Plan. First sentence will be revised to read "For areas outside the City limits, but within the RWSA, the City shall condition service on agreement that development is in compliance with City water system standards." 8 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 50 Sec 3.2.7 Connections for Existing Wells King The second to last bullet on page 3-5 says, "The owner of lands located within Auburn's water service area that apply to connect to the Auburn water system shall sign a service agreement prohibiting the installation of an irrigation well or wells on their lands for which service is provided." Please state how this requirement will be implemented for that part of the RWSA in unincorporated Kind County in the light of RCW 90.44.050. Comment noted. No change will be made. The owner of a parcel who desires water service from the City is not specifically prohibited from exercising the provisions of RCW 90.44.050 but rather is entering into a contractual agreement to not install an irrigation well as a condition of water service. 51 Sec 3.2.8 Service Extension King The second paragraph talks about the City working cooperatively with King county to ensure that water system facilities constructed within the RWSA and unincorporated Kind County meet or exceed the County standard. We agree that water system facilities must be constructed to King County's standards and are happy to meet with the City on this point if needed. We are unaware of any water system facilities that do not meet County standards in place at the time development occurred. Comment noted. No change will be made. 52 Sec 3.4.5 Fire Flow Quantities King Please document the fire flow quantities that apply within the RWSA and outside of the City. For King County we would look for those standards to be consistent with KCC 17.08 Change will be made in the final Plan. First bullet will be revised to read "residential area within the RWSA." and the second bullet will be revised to read "parks and open spaces within the RWSA." 53 Sec 3.5.1 Agency Coordination King We support the City in its efforts to coordinate and cooperate with other agencies. We are concerned with section 3.5.1 in that the City within this planning process should determine the applicable regulatory requirements for water now, as compared to some coordination at some date in the future. For King County, an adequate water supply is defined in KCC 21A.28.040 and we look for the City to purvey water consistent with those standards for that portion of the of the RWSA in unincorporated King County. Comment noted. No change will be made. 9 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 54 Sec 3.6.1 Water Supply Planning King The City will project future populations with data from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Using the PSRC population data for future forecasts seems very reasonable. We also encourage the City to ensure that the Growth Management Act population and employment targets accepted by the City be considered within your analysis of future needs. The objective is to ensure that the policy goals for population and employment for the City can be met by the water supply. Change will be made in the final Plan. The third sentence will be revised to read "Future water demands will be estimated using existing water usage patterns and projected future populations developed by the City Planning Department and consistent with the Puget Sound Regional Council data. 55 Sec 3.8 Water Use Efficiency King We are pleased to see the City promoting programs and addressing water efficiency. We encourage the City to comply with existing state law and file a water use efficiency goal with DOH for 2009. Our understanding is the City had not filed its goal for this year. We believe that an aggressive conservation program is on that, at a minimum, meets existing statutory standards. Comment noted. No change will be made. 56 Sec 3.8.7 Reclaimed water King We appreciate the statement that the City is committed to wastewater reuse. We also noted the language is section 6.7.4 and section 8.2.5 echoes the commitment to the evaluation and use of reclaimed water. As you know, King County is exploring the development of a reclaimed water comprehensive plan. I appreciate the work you have done with Mark Duscher and Kristina Westbrook related to that planning effort; we encourage the City to integrate your evaluation of reclaimed water with the County's work to the extent practical. The City's commitment to reclaimed water can be further supported by completion of the reclaimed water checklist and inclusion of it in the Plan. It appears that the checklist is incomplete (the first page is missing) in appendix M. Change will be made in the final Plan. First page of the checklist will be included in Appendix M. 10 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 57 Sec 3.10.10 Water Rate Structures King This section states that water rates should be set by customer class based on the costs to serve each customer class. We understand the city imposes a 50 percent surcharge on services outside the City, but within the RWSA. However, we could find no justification or explanation of what additional costs relate solely to service outside the City to justify the 50 percent surcharge. Please provide a rational beyond the policy statement in the Plan to justify those costs of service for those areas outside the City in unincorporated King County. We believe such a description in the Plan will be helpful should the County have to address an appeal of timely and reasonable service under the CWSP. Comment noted. No change will be made. The City is presently conducting a rate study to determine the appropriate level of adjustment to rates over the 2009-2014 planning period, with results expected by the end of the first quarter 2010. 58 Sec 4.6.1 Existing Land Use King Figure 4.6 describes the zoning within the City. On figure 4.6, the zoning for unincorporated King County within the RWSA is not described. Please affirm that even though figure 4.6 does not describe the zoning for that portion of the RWSA within King County that King County land use zoning was used as part of your analysis. We suggest that figure 4.6 would be more complete if it reflected the County's zoning. County land use zoning for those areas can be found on the King county website. Change will be made in the final Plan. County zoning will be added to the figure. 59 Sec 4.7 Growth Rate King Within this section it would seem appropriate to discuss the final population and employment demand projections used for the water forecast and, the GMA adopted population and employment targets for the same six and twenty year periods. Please describe how the GMA adopted population and employment targets were considered in your analysis. Comment noted. No change will be made. Final population and employment projections are presented in Table 4.8 and details of the analysis are included in Appendix F. 60 Figure 4.7 Water Service Area King As you know, there are generally three areas associated with the City and water supply, the corporate boundary of the city, the RWSA, and the future service area under the CWSP. We encourage you to use one of those three terms. However, if another term is used to describe the water service area it would be helpful to define it. Please describe if the "water service area" on figure 4.7 is the same as your RWSA, perhaps the future service area under the CWSP, or some other area. Change will be made in the final Plan. The City has areas of the system that contain multiple pressure zones, commonly referred to by Operations staff as water service areas. The City has four such water service areas: the Valley, Academy, Lea Hill and Lakeland Hills service areas. Text will be added in Section 2.2 and Figure 2.1 will be modified to clarify this. 11 of 11 Draft Comprehensive Water Plan Comment Response Matrix Date: November 2009 Item number is provided for reference only. ResponseReviewerItem #Topic Review CommentsPage # or Section 61 Sec 6.8 Appendix K King Appendix K pertains to ground water management and the City's wellhead protection plan. The description of the wellhead protection plan, especially section 6.8.1 leads us to believe there had been no change in the delineation of the time of travel zones from the 2001 water system plan. The City's wellhead protection plan from the 2001 water system plan was incorporated into our critical areas ordinances and reflected in critical aquifer recharge areas as described in the 2008 King County comprehensive Plan. If the wellhead protection zones have not changed, the current critical areas ordinances affords the maximum protection for that portion of the wellhead protection areas in unincorporated King County and we can meet our mutual interest of protecting ground water quality for domestic supply. Change will be made in the final Plan. There have been changes in the delineation since the 2001 Plan. Text and figures presenting the new delineations will be added. Reviewers:City of Auburn Public Works Committee (PWC) City of Auburn Planning and Community Development Committee (PCDC) City of Auburn Planning Commission (PC) King County DPNR (King) Pierce County Utilities (Pierce) City of Pacific (Pacific) City of Auburn Public Works Utility (PW) From: Jim Morgan [mailto:jmorgan@ci.pacific.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 1:29 PM To: Cynthia Lamothe Cc: Jay Bennett (Pacific); James Schunke Subject: Auburn Water System Plan Cynthia Thank you for providing the City of Pacific an opportunity to review the August 2009 City of Auburn Comprehensive Water System Plan. The review has determined that retail service between the City of Pacific and City of Auburn is consistent with our understanding of the boundary. The emergency intertie to provide the City of Pacific is consistent with our records. James J. Morgan, P.E. City Engineer 100 3rd Avenue SE Pacific, WA 98047 jmorgan@ci.pacific.wa.us (253)929-1115 - Phone (253)887-9910 - Fax Appendix C APPROVALS To Be Inserted at a Later Date Appendix D DISPOSITION OF 2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM De s c r i p t i o n s Q u a r t e r S e c t # S t a t u s Bu d g e t e d O & M Le g e n d OM - 1 0 5 Sp r i n g S u p p l y S o u r c e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n Co m p l e t e N o p r o g r e s s o n p r o j e c t Pr o j e c t p a r t i a l l y c o m p l e t e d In c r e m e n t a l O & M Pr o j e c t c o m p l e t e d OM - 1 1 3 PR V S e t t i n g A d j u s t m e n t P r o g r a m Co m p l e t e OM - 1 0 6 Di s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m M o d e l i n g Co m p l e t e , o n g o i n g OM - 1 0 7 Di s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m R e s e r v o i r W a t e r Qu a l i t y A n a l y s i s Pa r t i a l So m e s a m p l i n g o c c u r r e d , n o p r o b l e m s de t e c t e d a t L e a H i l l 1 . 0 o r A c a d e m y 1 . 0 OM - 1 1 2 We l l 1 I n v e s t i g a t i o n 91 0 N o p r o g r e s s OM - 1 0 8 Co r r o s i o n C o n t r o l M o n i t o r i n g P r o g r a m Co m p l e t e d , o n g o i n g St o r a g e R e s e r v o i r s SR - 1 0 2 Le a H i l l 1 . 5 m g R e s e r v o i r P a i n t i n g 51 4 C o m p l e t e d E x t e r i o r & I n t e r i o r SR - 1 0 3 Ac a d e m y 1 . 0 m g R e s e r v o i r P a i n t i n g 12 1 5 C o m p l e t e d E x t e r i o r & I n t e r i o r SR - 1 0 4 Ac a d e m y 1 . 5 m g R e s e r v o i r P a i n t i n g 12 1 5 C o m p l e t e d E x t e r i o r & I n t e r i o r SR - 1 0 5 La k e l a n d H i l l s R e s e r v o i r P a i n t i n g 14 1 0 N o p r o g r e s s SR - 1 0 1 Le a H i l l 1 . 0 m g R e s e r v o i r P a i n t i n g 51 4 C o m p l e t e d E x t e r i o r & I n t e r i o r Wa t e r D i s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m DS - 6 7 0 - 1 0 8 , 2 0 9 Au b u r n W a y N o r t h A s b e s t o s P i p e Ab a n d o n m e n t 10 8 , 2 0 9 N o n e PR - 1 0 8 - 3 1 1 Hy d r a n t 1 1 5 5 R e l o c a t i o n 31 1 N o P r o j e c t s D o n e PR - 1 0 7 - 3 1 2 SE 2 9 5 t h S t r e e t A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 31 2 N o P r o j e c t s D o n e PR - 1 0 9 - 4 1 2 SE 2 9 6 t h P l a c e A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e PR - 1 1 1 - 4 1 2 SE 2 9 8 t h P l a c e A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e PR - 1 2 1 - 4 1 2 10 8 t h A v e n u e S E A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e PR - 1 2 2 - 4 1 2 10 8 t h A v e n u e S E A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e PR - 1 2 3 - 4 1 2 10 8 t h A v e n u e S E A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e PR - 1 2 4 - 4 1 2 10 9 t h A v e n u e S E A s b e s t o s P i p e Re p l a c e m e n t 41 2 N o n e Re p a i r a n d R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t s