HomeMy WebLinkAbout6580 ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 8 0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING;
ADOPTING ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT
AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW
CHAPTER 36.70A
WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted
a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the
location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive
Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth
Management Act; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn City Council reaffirmed that
action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an
updated Comprehensive Plan which includes a Map establishing the location of the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City by Ordinance No.
6584; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an
advertisement 4hat 4he City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications
and established a deadline for submittal of June 5, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received privately-initiated map amendments
(File Nos. CPA14-0002, CPA14-0003 8� CPA15-0002) however these applica4ions were
not complete for processing; and
--------------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 1
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated five text/policy amendments (File No.
CPA15-0001); and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments were processed
by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2015
annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in
order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2015
Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of
the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP15-0030) and were determined to
have no envirbnmental significance; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington
State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other
State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and
WHEREAS, after proper notice published in fhe City's official newspaper at least
ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on
December 8, 2015, conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Auburn City Planning Commission heard
and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made
recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2015 annual
Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and
--------------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 2
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2014, the Auburn City Council reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 2016, the Auburn City Council considered 4he
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The 2015 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text
Amendments (CPA15-0001), as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, are adopted and approved. The City Clerk shall file
Exhibit "A" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection.
The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school districYs Capital
Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall
be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this
Ordinance and keep them available for public inspec#ion. Council adopts both the
Planning Commission's recommendations, dated December 8, 2015, and the Findings
and Conclusions outlined in the December 15, 2015, sfaff report, attached as Exhibit
�rB��
Section 2. The 2015 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the
Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703; and
adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995; and adopted December 14,
2015 by Ordinance No. 6584.
-------------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 3
Section 3. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a
basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State
Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance
with RCW. 43:21C.060.
Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include
incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text
amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" preparing and publishing
the amended Comprehensive Plan.
FIRST READING: �AN —4 2016
SECOND READING: .IAN T�9 2D16
PASSED: JAN 1'9 2016
APPROVED: JAN 1��J 2016
ancy Backus ��,���Q�
MAYOR � f� �
ATTEST: I /'�
���.� �
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
-------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 4
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Da iel B. Heid, i ttorney
Publishecl: as ao��:-�-- %� '�`L�' �-�^-`-�
--------------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 5
Exhibit "A"
The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School District
Capital Facilities Plans
Cify of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
(See "Comp. Plan Polic�/Text Amendments`' ta.b in the working binder)
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 6
POLICY & TEXT AMEiUDMENT (PT #1)
INCORPORATE AUBURN SCHODL DISTRICT #408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015- 2021
�
Auburn School District No. 408
��� I��� ��� I �I�� ��
� ���
2015 th rou g h 2021
, � : J :.
�'E..; nfw- � tr,ax . : .
'�":Y d a..sk �....r y::. �
1 9� � 't�x �b : � .4 �r
1 � 1 i�, 7Y �': G ';�. —tW"m' •
.I��� 1 .i`x .
Y' � {z' .'�'"
� •. �� '".Yy N+�
- z • 4 �
.+�. � � � }� �; k�� �� �' �
�s�l {.
.�.�wy . .+ � ` jµ•� F .
tsn g .. n.4 � �� � '� '•�.d
� � S. u'e't'
e�.1. .n ' � �
� ¢3' .
s. ' ^ '� � 'R�'�. �`I� t�
t,g �.W', �4' J'i� =
"`^`— � �y.a'i
,�q [•r�µv�1:�
��
irv' � t'�
+� �'
� i� �.flv4fM1( Ri+S{dy'�.. ���A�5. `0.
r42 �
ra ;
x i - i
i �1 � & r' ��. ���
o , .. � y t9 r tid ' k�;i,� T �
£te+' t t� 1 tr.e1�a' : q� � a_. { h
�N'�`,a.: r 5 '' 9 ',ti�. � '
�t��� �i r, r•R �, .�'y,
<
y� �- :w e ...
.w.y ��� '' -.' .rv,: � .
r'4 * -.s 'n':
z � � � : ,�
4 3i , r
1 Ja .,��� �.
' A• �"� .n T^
r, '
_ ..���:. ' -c+''^�
Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors
June 8, 2045
pjt� � �-' " �V
SCHOOL DISTRICT �
ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER
9t5 Fourth Street NE
Auburn, Washington 98002
(253),931-4900
Serying Stutlents in:
Unincorporafed King County
City of Aubum
City of Algona
City of Kent
City of Pacific
City of Black Diamond
BOARD ofi DIRECTORS
Carol Seng
Ray Vefik
Anne Baunach
Laurie Bishop
Ryan Van Quill
Dr. Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent
� Table of Contents
Section I Executive Summary .....:..:.............. Page 1
Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6
Section I I I Standard of Service.:........:............. Page 8
Section IV Inventory of Facilities...................... Page 15
Section V Pupil CaPacity......:......,..,..,..,........ Page 19
Section VI Capital Construction Plan................ Page 22
Section VII Impact Fees.................................. Page 26
Section VIII Appendices...................._._............ Page 30
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 31
Appendiic A;2-Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45
Appendix A.3'-Student Generation Survey Page 50
Auburn School District No. 408
Capitai Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section I
Executive Summary
Auburn School Disfict No. 408
_. _ _.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015 through 2021
I. Executive Summary
This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Aubum
School District.(the "DisfricY') as the Dist�icYs principal planning document, in compliance
with the requirements of-Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted
ordinances of the counfies and cities served by the District. This Plan.was prepared
using data available in the spring of 2015.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District.
However, tliis Pian is not intended to be 4he sole plan for all of the Distric4's needs. The
District may prepare interim and.periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consisfent
with Board Policies and actions,taking info account a longer or a sFiorter time period;
other factors and frends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be
required. However, any such pian or planswill be consistent with this six-year Capital
Facilities Plan.
To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and
within the City of Aubum and City of Kent; the King Gounty Council, 4he City of Aubum
and the Gi.ty of Kent will adopt this Plan by rgference as part of each ju�isdiction's
respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of
Aigona, Pacific and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and
adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ortJinances,
this Plan will be updated on anannual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)
adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes the DistricYs "standard of service" in order to ascertain the Dist�icYs
_ _ _
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Pu61ic InstNction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not accoun4 for
the local program needs of the District, The Growth Management Act and the school.
impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on 4he
DistricYs specific needs. In general, the Distric4's current stantla�d providesthat class
size for g�ades K-2 shoulci not exceecJ 25 stucients and 20.3 stutlerits forschools
designated as serving Fiigh Poverty areas; class size forvgrades 3-4 should not exceed
27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over
the six elementary grades, this computes to 24.8 students perclassroom. C,lass size fo.r
grades 6-12.should not.exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesse�
numbers. Decisions by current legislatiye actions may create the need for additional
classrooms. (See Section Iii for more specific information:)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service
and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The DistricYs
2014-1 S capacity was 13,432: The actual number of individual students was 15,277 as
of Octoberl, 2014. (See Section V for more specific information.)
2
The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and
proposed modemization to the Dis4ricYs existing facilities: This provided for a new high
school, Auburn Mountainview, approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened:in
8eptember2005; and tFie addition of tiyo new elementary schools approved by tHe
voters in Feb�uary 2005;with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includes the
construc4ion,of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as 4he
acquisition of'a future school site to accommodate growth. The new facilities are
required to meet:the projected student population increase to be generated from the
large development areas within the Aubum School District. Three areas that have
signifcanf impact on the school district are the Lakeland South,Lea Hill, and north
Auburn valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of deyelopment tf%af impact
the District as well.
The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008:
A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for cap'ital improvements to
existing facilities and teplacement of seven schools over the nezt ten y.ears. THese
recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a 6ond issue that was placed
on ttie ballot in March 2009: Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The
board determined to rerun only the capita.l improvements levy in;November 2009, which
the voters approved. In tfie Fall of 2011 the school�board determined to move forward
with the Aubum High School Moderniiation and Reconstruction P�oject.and placed the
project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the
_ ,_.
community.at nearly 57% approyal rate, but was short'of 4he super majority requirement
of 60%. In March of 2012 tFie school boa�d defermined to rerun the-bond again in
November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62% and construction for
the Aubum High School Modemization and Reconstruction Project began on February
25, 2013. Phase 1 of the three phase project was comple4ed and occupied by Aubum
High School students and staff in the fall of 2014. Phase2 is nearing compietion, The
entire new buiiding area will be occupied in the fall of 2015. Site work included in Phase
3 will be completed during the 2015/2016 school year.
The School ImpactFee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the
City of Kent provide for tfie as"sessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the
fiscal impacts incurred by a district ezperiencing growth and development: Section VII
sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling
units. The student ggneration factors have been developed using the students who
actually attend school in the Aubum School District from single family and multi=family
deJelopments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in
the student generation factors for single and multi-family in2013„201,4, and 2015. The
District pians fo carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if
_
this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS
mapping soHware, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and integration of the
mapping wi4h student data from the DistricYs student data system. This method gives
the District actual student gene.ration,numbers for each,grade span for identified
developments. TFiis data is contained in Appendix A.3.
3
Aubum�School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015 Nrough 202t
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
tisted below is a summary level outline of 4he changes from the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan that
are a part of the 2015 Plan. The changes are no4ed by Section for ease of reference.
Section 1
Executive Summary
A. Updated to reflect new information within:the Plan,
B. Summary level list of changes from previous year.
Section II
Enrollment P�ojections
Updated projections. See Appendices A:1 &A.2.
Section III
Standard of Service
_._. _.... . ..
A. Increase of 11 full-day kindergarten classrooms at elementary le4el in 2014-15.
B. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 25 to 20.3 students at 11
elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas in 2014-15.
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
A. Add 1 portable at Alpac Elementary.
B. Add 2 portables at ArtFiur Jacobsen Elementary.
C. Add 3 portables atDick Scobee Elementary.
D. Add 3 portables at Evergreen Heights Elementary.
E. Add 2 portables at Gildo Rey Elementary.
F. Add 2 portables atilalko Elementa.ry.
G.. Add 1 portable at Terminal Park Elementary.
H. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary.
Section.V
Pupil Capacity
All five of the new portable classrooms placed in January 2015 and four of the ten portables to
be placed in June 2015 are needed to accommodate enrollment increase: The remaining six
portables to be placed in June 2015 are needed to accommodate facility needs resulting from
transition to full-day kindergarten and class size reduction ra4her than increased enrollment.
4"
Aubum�School Districl No.408
. . . . _ . . _ .. ..
CAPITAL FACILITIES'PLAN
2015 tlircugh 2027
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ImpactFees CHA,NGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2014 to 2015
CPF CPf
_. _ _
DATAELEMENTS 2014 2015 _ __ _EXPLANATION_ _ ___._______—
Student Geri'e�ation Facfors - - -
- _
Single Family Consisfent with King CountyDrdinanqe 11621,
Elementary 0.1650 0.1960 Student Generation Factors:are oalculated
Middle School 0.0760 0.0730 by the school district based on disVict-
Sr. High 0.0890 0.0940 records of average actual student generation
Multi-Family ratesfor new tlevelopmentsconstructed
Elementary 0.2230 0.0650 over the{asffiVe years.
Middle School 0.0910 0.0380
Sr: High 0.0920 0.0220
School Construction CoSts
Elementary $29,800,000 $40,880,000 Updat$d estimates for 2015.
Middle School $40,880,000 $64,350,000 Updated estimates for2015.
Site Acquisition Costs
Cost pe�:acre $356,728 $393,774 Updated estimate oniand coSts.
Area Cost Allowance soeckn index $200.40 $200.40 Updated to p[ojected SPl schedule. (Ju1y2014)
Mafch %o-$tate 62:31% 63:11% Updated to current SPl schedule.
Match %- District 3Z.69% 36.89% Computed
District Averege AV
Single Family $210;210 $255,116 Updated from March 2015 King County
Dept of Assessments data.
Multi-Family $78,449 $111,737 Updated from March 2015;King County
Dept of Asses'sment§data usin'g weighted
average..
Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.12 $1.42 Current Fiscal Year
GO Bond Int Rate 4.38% 3.68% Current.Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14)
Section VIII
Appendiees
Appenclix A.1 - Updated en�ollment projections from October 1, 2014
Appendiz A:2= Updated enrollment projections with anticipated builiiout sohetlule from Ma[oh 2015
Appendix A:3-StudeM Generation Survey April 2015
5
i V
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section II
Enroliment Projections
Aubum School DisWcl No.408
CAPITAL FACIUTIE3 PLAN
2015 fhrough 2027
... . . __. _... . . . . .
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
The Autium School Disfict uses a modified coh;ort survival mbdel to project future enroliment for all
of the DistricYs operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in
AppendixA.2 tifled"CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN EnrollmentProjecGons". This Table shows the
an4icipated enrollment for the next six years based on 4he previoussix year history of the District under the
agsumptions setforth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projedion foradd'itional
students generated from new deyelopments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2.
TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT
__ -11.1- _ PROJEC210NS. March 2015 _ _ __ __ __ ._ ____
2014=15 �2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
GRADE Actual Projected Pro ected Pro ec[ed Pro'ected Pro'ecked Pro eded
KDG 1232 1280 1327 1375 1464 1507' 1547
1 1219 1294 1342 1389 1479 1521 1562
2 1196 1236 1311 1358 1448 1490 1531
3 1136 1209 1248 1323 1412 1454 1495
4 1156 1168 1241 1281 1398 1440 1480
5 1122 1175 1188 1260 1369 1411 1452
K-5 7061 7362 7657 7986 8570 8823 9067
6 1059 1126 1179 1191 1298 1367 1408
7 1091 1085 1152 1205 1285 1319 1387
8 1088 1099 1092 1159 1219 1287 1319
6 -8 3238 3310 3423 3555 3802 3973 4114
9 1275 1259 1271 1265 1381 1389 1455
10 1169 1285 1269 1280 1337 1385 1391
11 1211. 1157 1273 1257 1257 1319 1365
12 1323 1293 1240 1357 1347 1336 1396
9- 12 4978 4994 5053 5159 5322 5429 5607
TOTALS 15,277 15,666 16,133 16,700 17,694 18225 18,788
--- - � - - . __.. _ .
GRADESK-12 Actuai Pro'ected_ Pro'ected Pro'ected Fro'ected . Pro'ected_ Pro'ected_.
. .�..._.._. .K-5 - 7061- . . --7362 7657 7986 8570 �-8823 . . . .9067
6-8 3238 3310 3423 3555 3802 3973 4114
9-12 4978 4994 5053 5159 5322 5429 5607�
K•12 15,277 15,666 16,133 16,700 17,694 16,225 16;766
Note: The District is currenUy operating Full Day Kindergarten in fourteen elementary schools. This
in"Gudes State funded FuII:Day Kindergartens at eleven eiementary schools. The State projects to fully
implement Full Day Kindergarten tiy 2018.
7
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2oi5 m�o�9n 2ozi
Section III
Standard of Service
Aubum School Dishict No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIE$ PLAN
2015through 2021
STANDARD OF SERVICE.
The School Impact Fee Ordinancesadopted by King Counry, the Ciry of Aubum and the.City of Kent indicate
that each school district must esteblish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house
its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction estatilishes square footage
"caPacity"gurdelines fo�computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines
is;fo provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching fundsforschool:construcfion p{ojects. By default
these guidelines fiave been used to bench"mark the disMct's capacity to house its student population. The SPI
guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district prograrrm needs, faciliry configurations, emerging
educational reform, or the dynamics of each studenfs educationaf program. The Aubuni Schod District Standard
of Service addressesthose local considerafions fhat requrre space in excess of the SPl guidelrnes. The effecE
on thg space requiiementrfor both permanent and relocatable facilities is.shown below for each grade articulation
pa(tern. Condr;ions thatmay result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without
accompanying computations.
OVERVIEW
The Aubum School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,061 students in grades
K through 5. The four middle schoolshouse 3;238 students in grades 6 through 8. The Distriot operates
ihree comprehensive seniorhighschools and one altemative high school, housing 4,978 students in
grades 9 through 1,2.
CLASS SIZE
The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the
s4udent population. Specialists create additional.space needs. Classsizes are subject-to coliective.
bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact orr available space.
The current pupillteach:er limit across all elementary programs is an average of 24.8 students per
teacher. Consistent with this staffing hmit, room capacities are set at24.8 students per room at grades
K-5. At grades8- 12 the limit is set af30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for e:ach grade
articulation level,less the computed reductiore for the Auburn School District Standa'Pii of8ervice,
determines the DistricPs capacity to house projected pupil populations. These retlucUonsare shown
below by grade articulation level.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DfSABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
_ . _ .. .. __
The Aubum School District operates a stFuctured leaming program for students uvith moderate to sev,ere
disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooros to provide for 9.6 stuiients.
The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to
total elementary population.
ADAPTIVE:BEHAVIOR
_ _ . . ._
The Aulium School District operates an adaptive behaVior program for students_witli befiavior
disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students.
The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allxationsby one classroom..
Loss of PermaneM C@paci.ty 1 room @ 24.8 each = (25)
Loss of Tempo�ary-Czpacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = A
Total Capacity Loss (25)
9
Aubum School DisVict No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015th�oqgh 2027
STANDARD OF�.SERVICE
SRECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE:ROOMS
The Aubum School District operates a resource room p�ogram at the elementary level for special
eduqation stutlents requiring instruction to address their speciflc disabilities. Fourteen standard
classrooms are required to house this p�ogram. The housing requirements for this program exceed
the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss ofcapacity'is expected as,growth
in program is larger than the total elementary population.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 24.8 each = (174)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (174)
NAT(VE AMERICAN RESOURCEROOM
The Aubum School Distnct operates two resource'rooms to support the education of Native American
students at 4he elementary level. Two standard classrooms arefully dedicated toserve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 24.8 each = (50)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (50)
HEAD START
The Aubum School District operates a-Head,Start.program.for approzimately 114 pre-school aged cHild�en
in siz sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at tliree elementary schoolsand utilizes
three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office sPaces. The housing [equirements for this
program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 24.8 each = (74)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (74)
EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION
Tfie Aubum School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with
disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schoofs and currently uses 10
standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not providei!for in the SPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capaaity 10 rooms @ 24.8 each = (248)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (248)
READING LABS
The Aubum School District operates a program for studentsneeding remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if aVailable in
each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms ayailable, thus
they are housed in a standard classroom.Ttie housing requirements for;his program are not
proVided for in the SPI space guidelines,
Loss ofPermanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 24.8 each = (99)
Loss of Temporary CapacityA rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (99)
10
Aubum.School Distrid No.A08
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2075 through 2021
STANDARD OF SERVICE
MUSICROOMS
The Aubum School District elementary musicprograms require one acoustically modified classroom at each elemf
school formusic instruction. The housing requirementsare not provided forin the SPl space guidelines:
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 24.8 each = (347)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (347)
_ __
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Aubum School:pistrict oqe,rates a pullout program at the elementary school level forstudents
learning English as a second language. This program requires f,ourteen standard classrooms that are not
provided fo�in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 24:8 each = (347)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.85 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (347)
SECOND GRADETOSA PROGRAM
_ __
The AubumSctioof District provide's a TO.SA reading specialist p�ogram for eight highly impacted
elementary schools. Ttiis puilout model provides direct insVuction to studenfswho are:not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are
not provided forin the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 24.8 each = (198)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capaaity Loss (198)
__ .
ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM
The Autium School.District provides a leaming specialistprogram to increase literacy skills for
fir$t and second graders, TFiis program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and curren4ly
Has the specialist going into existing teach'er classrooms, aswell aspulling,out studentsinto
designated classrooms. The disfrict is utilizing classroomsat all fourteen elementary scfiools.
Loss of Pertnanent�Capacity 14 rooms @ 24.8 each = (347)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (347)
FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN
_ _ . _.
The Aubum School District proyides Fu11-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for
kindergarten students, This program model tias been created from tuition, Title I funds, LAP funds, and
currently there are eleven scFiools receiving state funding for the 2014-15 sch:ool year. The district is utilizing
a tofal of 56 classrooms at the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceeii the OSPI space
guidelines for this program by 31 classrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 31 rooms @ 24.8 each = (769)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (769)
11
Aubum-School Distnc[No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015through 2027
STANDARD OF SERVICE
EARLY CNILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Aubum School DistFict provides an Early ChildFiood Education Assistance Program to meet local
needs for disadvantaged students. The State has funded an increase of 24 ECEAP seats. This program
will require two new classrooms for 2015-16.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 24.8 each = (74)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (74)
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Aubum School District operates a resource room program fo�each grade at the middie school level.
Thi5 is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific
disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middleschool level to provide for approximately316 students.
The hiousing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
ADAPTNE BEHAVIOR SPEC/AL EDUCATION
The Aubum School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the
two classrobms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allorations.
Loss of Permaneht Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30)
Loss of Temporary Capaci.ty 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
STRUCTURED LEARN/NG CENTERAND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAlEDUCATION
The Aubum School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school IeVel for
students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with
p�ofound disabilities. Two of the fide classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI spaceallocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (90)
MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS
The Aubum.School District operates a minimum of one computer lab ateach of the four middle schools,
This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided
for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Perrrmanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120)
Loss of Temporary Cap'acity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (120)
ENGUSH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
_._ . .
The Aubum School DisVict operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language
Leamer students. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI
space guitlelines.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Gapacity Loss (120)
12
Auburn School Distric[No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015 through 2027
STANDARD OF SERVICE
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Aubum School District proyides a comprehensive middle school program that includes
elective optionsin special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable.to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of alI a4ailable
teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations aVailable in the
mid-level facilities. The u6lization pattem results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (240)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
SENIOR NIGH COMPUTER LABS
The Aubum Schoof District operates Nvo computer labs at each of the senior high schools.This
progrem utilizes two standard clas5rooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Aubum.
The housing requirements for thisprogram are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of'Permanent Capacity 7 rooms@ 30 each= (210) I
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (210)
ENGUSH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Aubum School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English
Language Leamer students. 7his program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided
for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Perrnanent Gapacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (90)
ADAPT/VEBEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATlON
_ _ _ . . . _
The Aulium School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe beliavior
diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing
requirements for ttiis program are notprovided for in the SPI space allocations.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM
The Aubum School DisUict operates nine structured leaming center classrooms for stuiients with
moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided
forin fhe SPlspace guidelines.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each= (150)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (150)
13
Aubum School DistriG No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2075thiough 2021
STANDARD OF SERVICE
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE.ROOMS
The Aubum School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for speaal
education students reGuiring instruction tb addre9s tlieir specific leaming disabilities. The current
high school program requires 11 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of
the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each= (300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (300)
PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS
Aubum High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center.The
SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was
not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. k was constructed to provide a
community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines,25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 8:33 classrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250)
ROOM UTIUZATION
The Aubum School Disfict provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities a�e
not amenable to standard classroom usage. TFie district ayerages 95%utilization of all available
teaching stations.Tfiere are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization
pattem results in a loss of approzimately 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each= (300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (300)
STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS
EIEMENTARY
Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,753)
Loss of Temporary Gapacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (2,753)
MIDDLE SGHOOL
Loss of Pertnanent Capaci.ty (600)
Loss of Temporary Capaciry 0
Total Capacity Loss (600)
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity (1,330)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (1;330)
TOTAL
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity (4,683)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (4,683)
14
I l.il] I
:i.J ' .:� �, „ ,,;-
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
Aubum-School DistriG No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
�2015through 2027
INVENTORY OF FACILRiES
Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of pertnanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacitles.
Table IV_2 shows the numtier and location of each portable unit 6y school. TFie district uses relocatable
facilities to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing schbol
populations that would otherwise require continual redisfricting,
2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique
student needs, and
3. proviiie housing to cover disfrict needs until perinanent facilities can be financed and construoted.
Relocatable facilities are deemed to tie interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on
existing physical plants. Core facilities(i.e. gymnasiums;restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.)are
not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable
classrooms.
Table PermanentFacilities District_SchoolP_acilities
IV.1 @ OSPI-Rffied Gapacity �- ----�-�-� --- � - -.... - . ".
(December 2014)
Buildin Ca acit Acres_ Address
. Elertienta .Schools �
Washin� ortElementa 486 5.40 �20.E:Street Northeast,Autium.WA,98002� � - � - �
Termina(Park Elemerita 408 6.70 1101 D Streei Southeast,Aubum WA,98002
DickScobee Elementa 477 10:50 1p31 14th StreefNortheast,Auburn WA,98002
Pioneer Elementa 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast,Aubum WA,98002
Chinook Elementa 440 8�5 3502 Aubum We South,Aubum WA,98092
_ _
Lea HiII.Elementa 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Aubum WA,98092
.Gildo Re Elementa 551 10,00 1005 37th Street Southeast,Aubum WA,98002
Eve reen Hei hts Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th,Aubum,WA;98001_ _
AI ac Elementa 49Z 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North,-Pacific WA 98047
Lake View Elementa . 559. 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Autium WA 98092
_HazelwoodElementa.� 580 �2��6� 11815:Southeast304thSt�eet,Aubum-WA,98092 -
Ilalko Elementa 585 12:00 301 Or`avetz'Plabe Southeast,Aubum WA,98092
Lakeland Hills Elementa 594 12:00 1020 Everg"reen Way SE,Autium WA,98092
Arthur Jscob§en Elementz 614 10.00 29205'132n°Street SE,Auburn WA,98092
_
ELEM CAPACITY 7,138
Middle Schools
Cascade-Middle School � 829�� �� 17:30 101524th Street Northeast, Aubum WA,.98002
01 m ic Middie School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast,Aubum WA, 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620116thAvenue Southeast;Aubum WA,98092
MtBaker Middle School 837 30•$8 620 37th Street Southeas4 Auburn WA 98002
MS CAPACITY 3,430
Senior Hi h Schools
West Aubum Hi h School 233 5,19 401�Wes4Main Street,. Aubum WA,.98001
Aubum SeniorHi h 2,100 20.SD 711 East.Main SVeet,.Aubum WA,.98002.
.Aubum.RiversideNS �1,38Z. ���. . 501.Ora4efrRoad,AubumWA,98092 �
Autium Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900124"'Ave SE,Aubum WA,98092
SH CAPACITY 5,164
TOTAL CAPACITY 75,732
16
a �wr!i Tlf '��`�6F!'�'�'.�.�e���.-. e wv k«�'1i�'_ ���'�i. �
�, '�' �i
�� �' .��'y�e�j�i,i' �i �.�1Y9��,q�7�q���'"� �. �M�'� _ � s � '�
�3 ���,����� �� - � ;�"�'''�� u����� �` ���� � �`� -�+'�t a���,`� •
���; _ ;. �-ti� t �
� � i—n� � ���^�� '� � �'.. �� � ��
.. ��
� � �
�� S�— `Y, �
�
IV��. �' fl� ; _,;:`�1"'# � . � #� ��i! �� �
� � � . .;�w� . ,,� �� ;`�`� � ��;E1 ,�� ��;��
,,_ . ,�4..,,
� �. •
���,j�� ; � �`n�:.., ��,..� ' �i„� "/� �-�
, .
�.r-" . � r �� '�' ` �q � �'
•�����'`='~�J .4�R'P7"e �"'�"� � ^�■ N � �/ i, .. O s:,
r P7f `ry �I �p
rt.i`+�d �E"7vf'^t} � ' ry�yp�� �FHcI '��Y�1f7r�1 �f:�u ��d� �I►,� .."�_� .. ,r,�y _
�_, a -�.�. {it11�.6��RNl9eE�°�''�71 '��(,,tr y�i,��.,�'y-� � � '� , ��
� er� �' . ��� r � ���y�PF��. � � . . � �r'
�: ! s;�'?� � *���f.�l;
�
�. ;i ��+a..� S�L��(' ¢w�l�*� I �,. ,,,, ,,.
����� 'o' ;'�€ -�;ti?.�;��I�f;#pIf���:'.k�' ,¢� � �'� ;'� � _� � - I
��� �i� I � 3�4!'w,��`i � �R �I,r_•f -,} ��11
� �
�f st fZ� �Q3 { � � . ` � � � �} � .A.
�� ! V � i�C c JFff� n 4F t� �;n`.
�� ���. �' �`•y.. �4�� !'. 6.`=rer f�1i 3�� �
� ,
�
.�� ��. fci54 � �+'FFGlC�;����R�, �i �, +�4 .� • 4 .,n i �.
�I '
�`��l,�i�'W� �11:��C�"ilrl='.a `y�� /C. �. �� �, - : �'
� �'s
:��\! �~�'�/�fA�� tf w-r!� r.� r'"`4__a �ly��� �� , �' �' ,
������� r/��r��'� '�'���I� � �ro- , �, ,.
� � n� �... ,, . r�`°�\�� istJt. _ .- _ .
►'���.•Z"��I.� j��G="�-�N ��' � .�.'`�.,. , iJ:,P'�E'wrF.•� � � '� � . „ " �'i: r c.
�4 i jij��+e,1) ��.�[�1�I E I�'��µx �N`A�rr.�G�ff�� .._ .
��:Eeii�y�( ����r i�'����':.\�ir� .�`� . �''�a�s+ _ ,�: �-t� —
� "l._� � (� �
li�I�R�e 'VI jsw � �.,���"t��,� ��,�/ '�.. .y� ' , .. �"li„ i7'-1
,. � ` ' Ls� ` '-� �
+� F, �� � r
��tii�i���l �f�' �" • ; �,
� �
{r.•� ., - �_ `�=�i�. �� �` ��=_ � ,� v`� ) ,
�K�II�PPs !tl7��w f�.t ����i�'�„�.�y'� �i r ...�� _ --
ir. S�F�.GSSY?L + ' 1'+ � �� t '�' �� �'ra.�
� �A�INIPI'f{Fp� �S;r�� ) � � � �._ .. ��"' �
�tl��,„9NI�F 7�rta �.�'— f�.ry/..� � .,��
l�� �t!1/ Y /e� �� Rt1 %/t � . ��
AL L��3111,1\ ( f�7+�f��� �1 �
t��lZid�qy/�RGT aalNi^k. .1. ���'��, �,�.:i� ,�� '.
I IR��I�IfL�r IRf1 Y�` `f�' � � .
l�qs�1 � f ' � _
ur.:�� u� .� f[al�'.YP�ti'F��X" �t- �f� pppp
GG;C�R41l�Y'.I,�NiJR�a,tnrnl�" ���c' ��3 �S'�,fa, � �� .. ���
• • 1 � I :
�yEGF4Oli 1��ie �1�. r � '�iiC, . �li �
�u�;,��'�a��1 . ,,����,�� �E�i�"� � '�i
���'�H���, �`S�'�f �j�yl��` '�� ! I�
� �� �L7► ���� iY��9 �� �
.
��� .. .. ,
�� ��'�.�` 'x� ��:,� �—'�.� . . �
�� ;���. � � _ , ; �
�� � � � �, � � �
�� � �wu� �, � `� � � �� I
�� . � :;' ` ::�,,,� �� ���
;,� ; ., � x J � , ����� I
Aubum School Distric[No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015through 2021
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE
IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY
(March 2015
Eleme'ntary Location 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
W.ashington 2 3 3 3 3 3 4
Terminal Park 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
Dick Scobee 7 7 7 8 8 8 8
Pioneer 5 6 6 6 6 6 6
Chinook 5 5 6 6 6 6 6
Lea Hill 5 5 6 6 6 6 6
Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 7 7 7
Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 5 5 5 6
Alpac 5 5 6 6 6 6 6
Lake Uew 2 2 3 3 3 3 4
Hazelwooil 2 3 3 4 4 4 5
Ilalko 6 6 7 7 7 7 7
Lakeland HiIIs Elementary 6 6 7 7 7 7 7
Arthur,Jacobsen Elementa 2 2 2 3 3 4 4
TOTAL UNITS � 61- �64�� " - 70� 74 75 76 81
TOTAL CAPACITY 1,513 1,587.._ . 1,Z36. 1,835 1,860 �1,885 2;009
MiddleSchoolLocation 2015-16 2016-17 201Z-18 . 2018-19. 201930 2020-21 . "202]=22.
Cascade 0 2 2 2 2 2 _ -2 "-"
Olympic 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Rainier 5 7 7 8 8 8 S
Mt. Balier 8 8 g g g g g
TOTAL UNITS 13 19 19 20 20 20 20
TOTAL CAPACITY �390 570 570 600 600 600 600
Sr.-Hi hScFlool Location 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
West Aubum � � �0� 0 1 1 1 1 1
Auburn High School 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Auburn High School-*TAP � 1 1 � 1 1 1
Auburn Riverside 13 1�3 13 13 13 13 13
Auburn Mountainview 2 3 4 4 4 _ 4. 4
TOTAL UNITS 16 17 19 19 19 19 -- 19-""—'
TOTAL CAPACITY 480 510 570 570 570 570 570
_ __.
'TAP-Transition Assistanqe Program for 18-21 yea�old students with special needs.
COMBINEDTOTALUNITS 90� 700 108 113 714� 1�15 120
COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,383. 2,667 2,876 3;005 3,030 3,055� 3,179
18
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section V
Pupil Capacity
Aubum School DisVict No.408
CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN
2015 through 2021
PUPIL CAPACITY
While the Aubum School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from
which to detertnine space needs, the District's educational program reguires more space than that
proyided for under the formula. This additio�al square footage is conJerted to numbers of pupils in
Section III, Standard of Service. The DistricYs capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for addiGonal
space to house itsprograms. Changes in the capacity of the disVict recognize new unfunded
facilities.The combined effect of these adjusVnents is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V2 below.
Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with reloca4able units included and Table V:2 without these units.
Table V.7
Capaci.ty
WITH relocatables 2015-16 2016-17 2017-1$ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021=22
;4. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,832
A.1 SPI Capaci4y-New Elem 650 650
1/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800
B. CapacityAdjustments 2,300 2,016 1,807 1,678 1,653 1,628 1,504
C. Net Capacity 13,432 13,716 14,575 15,354 15,379 16,204 16;328
D. ASD Enrollment 15,277 15,666 16,113 16,700 17,694 18,225 18,788
3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,845) (1,950) (1,538) (1,346) (2,315) (2,021) (2,460)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
Include Relor.atable 2,383 2,667 2,876 3,005 3,030 3,055 3,179
2/ Eiccluile SOS 14 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683
Total Adjustments (2,300) (2,016) (1,807) (1,678) (1,653) (1,628) (1,504)
Table V2
Gapacity
WITHOUT relocatables 20T5-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021=22
A. SPI Capacity 15;732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,832
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650
1/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800
B. Capaciry Adjustments 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4;683 4,683
G. NetCapaciry 11,049 '11;049 11;699 12,349 12;349 13,149 13,149
D. ASD Enrollment 15,277 15,666 16,113 16,700 17,694 18,225 18,788
3/ E. ASDSurplus/Deficit (4,228) (4,617) (4;414) (4,351) (5,345) (5,076) (5,639)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
2/ Exclude.SOS 14 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683 4,683
Total Adjustm@nts (4,683) (4,683) (4,683) (4,683) (4,683) (4,683) (4,683)
11 New facilities shown in 2017-18,201&19,and 2020-21 are not funded under the cunent Capital Facilities Plan.
?/ The Standard of Service represents 29.77%of SPl capaciry. When new facilities are added the Standard
of Service computations are decreased to 2626%of SPI capacity.
3/Students beyond She capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons, library,theater,shared teaching space).
20
Aubum School Distrid No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
- - 2015 through 2021
PERMANENTFAduTIES PUPIL CAPACITY
@ SPI.Rated Capacity
March 2015
A. Elementa Schools
Buildin 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2078-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486
Tertninal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408
Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 47�7 477 477
Pioneer 441 441 441 441 �441 441� 441
Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 S51 551
Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456
Alpab 497 497 497 497 497 497 497
Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559
Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580
Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585
Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594
ArthurJacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614
Elementary#15 650 650 650 650 650
Elementa #16. . . . . _ ._ . 650__. . 650 __650 __ _.650_ ._.
ELEM CAPACIN 7,138 7,138. 7.788 8.436_ 8,438 8.438 _ 8;438_ _
B. Middle Schools
Buildin 201516 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829
Olympic. 921 921 921 921 921 921 921
Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843
Mt. Baker 837 837 837 637 837 837 837
Middle School#5 800 800
MS CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 4,230 4,230
C. Senior Hi h Schools
Buildin _ 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018r_19. 2019-2Q 2020-21_ _2021-22
WestAubum � � 233, 233 233 233 233 233 233
Aubum 2;101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2;101 2,101
Auburn Ri4erside 1,387 1,387 1;367 1,387 1,387 1�,387 �,387
Aubum Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443. 1,443 1,443
HSCAPACITY �5,164 5,164 5,164 �5,164 �� 5,164- �- �� 5,164 -� �5,164-
COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032. 17,032 17,832 17,832.
21
Aubum School District No. 408 _.'
Capital Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section VI
Capital Constraction Plan
Aubum School DisUid No.408 �
.. ... ._ . ... ._._.. .. .. .
CAPITAL FACIGTIES PLAN
- zo�sitir'oyanzozj
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974
with fhe formafion of a communitywide citizens committee. The result of thiscommittee's work was
published in the document ti4led 'Guidelines for Development.' In 198fi the Board formed a second
Ad Hoc ci4iiens committee to furtherthe work of the firs4 and address the needs of the District for
_
subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titied Directions for
fhe Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a thiM Ad Hoc citizens committee to make
recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee
recommendations are published in the document titled 'E,ducation Into The Twenty-First Century--
A Community Mvolved.'
The 1995 A_d Hoc committee.recommended the District develop plans forthe implementation,
funding, and deployment of technology throughout the DistricYs programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition proyide8 funding to enhance ttie,capacity of each facility to accommodate technological
applications. The 1998 Capitai Le4y ptovided funding to furtHer deploy technology at a IeVeI
su�cient to support program requitemenfs in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014,
replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support fectinology across all facets of
the DistricYs teaching,leaming and operations.
In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District
musf prepare for continued student enroliment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must
pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hocrecommendation induded
commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments.
A proposi4ion was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8;000,000 over siz years
to address some of the technology needs of the Distric4;and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire
school sites.
Du[ing tlie 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee wag appointed bythe
Aubu�n and Dieringer School Boards to make recommenda4ions on how best to serve the school
population from an area that includes a large develogment known as Lakgland South. Lakeland
South at th'at time irvas immediately adjacent to the southem boundary of the Aubum School District.
On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented iis recommendation at,a joint meeting of tFie
Auburn anii Die�inger Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 tFie Auburn School Boarci adopted
Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate ttie adjustment of the,boundaries of thg District
in acoo�dance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 thg Dieringer
School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the
adjustment of the boundaries in.accordanoe with the Ad Hoc Committge's reqommendation. These
actionsresulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland
South developmerit and certain other undeveloped properties.
Property for the third comprehensiye high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed,the
proposition on the tiallot four times prior to passing in 2003. Each election was eztremely close to
passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from thatmeeting the Boartl
determined need for further community study.
In April of 2UO2, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to add�ess the following two
items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002;
_... .._. .
a. A reView of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Gommittees
. _ . _ _. ._ . .
related.to acoommodating high school enrollment growth. This includgd;the review of
possible financing plans for new facilities.
b. Deyelop recommendations for accommodating higfi school enrollment growth for the next.l0
years if a new senioF high scHool is not built.
23
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015through 2021
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This committee recommendeii the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in
February 2003. The February election approved th:e new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The
school opened in the Fall of 2005.
In the Fall of 2003, the scFiool board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for
Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn ScFiool Board passed
Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters
approved the 6ailot measu�e in February of 2005 at 6472%. Lakeland Hills Elementa.ry(Elementary
#13)openetl in the Fail of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elemeritary(Elementary#14)is located in the
Lea Hill area and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were buiit to
accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hilis and Lea Hill areas of the school district.
In the 2004-OS school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study
and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was
the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendafions
including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements
program to modernize or replace faciiities based upon crRerion.
During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Ci4izen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Kent School Boards fo make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population that will come from an area fhat includes a number of projected developments in the
north Auburn valley. On May 17,2006 the Ad Hoc Gommittee presented its recommendation ata
_
joinfineeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 74, 2006 the Kent School Board
adopted Resolution No. 1225 au4horizing the process to initiate the adjustment of tfie boundaries of
the District in accordance with the AdHoc Committee's recommgntlation. On June 26, 2006 the
Auburn School Board adopted a companion Ftesolution No. 1073 authorizing the process tb initiate
fhe adjustment of the boundaries imaccordanoe with tlie Ad Hob C.ommittee's recommendation.
These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Aubum School
District effective September 29, 2006.
In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or
replace faoilities as recommended by the 2004-OS Citiien's Ad Hoc Committee. These
recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement
bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either
measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The board decided
to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%.
The levy will fund $46.4 million of needed improveme�t projects at 24 sites over the next seven
soliool years. Pianning for the replacement of aging schools has started with educational
specifications and schematic design process beginning in 2010 for Auburn High School. A future
bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects.
The school district acquired a site for a future middle school in 2009. The Special Education
Trensition Facility opened in February of 2010. This faciliry is designed for students with disabilities
that are 18 to 21 years old.
In the November 2012 election, the community supported the$110 million bond issue forthe Auburn
High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62'/0. The groundbreaking occurred in
February 2013 and construction began. This phased project is scheduled to be completed within the
next three years. Phase 2 is nearing completion. The entire new tiuilding will be oocupied by
Aubum High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvemenfs being completed
during the 2q15116 school year.
za
Aubum School District No.4D8
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015lhrough ZU27.
CAPITAL CONSTRUC770N PLAN
In January 2015; a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Aubum School
District Board of Di�ectors to address growfh and faci�ities. The major recommendations are to
construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school
sites as soon as possible.
Within the siz-yezr period, the District is projecting 474 additional students mostly from new
developmentin the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student
population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new
elementary sctiools, a new middle school and acqui�ing three new elementary school sitesand a
middle school site during the six-year window.
Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, aswell as tlie stutlent generation
data inGuded in Appendix A.3, the Districthas determined that approximately eighty-six percent of
the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development,
with the remaining additional ppacity required to address existing need..
The table below iilustrates the current capital construdion plan for the next six years. The exact
fimelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age popuiation and passage af
bond issues and/or capital improvement levies.
2015•21 Capital Construction Plan
A r112015 _ _ _
- --- - P�ojected Fund Project Timelines
Pro'ect Funded Cost Sou�ce 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 2021 21-22
All Facilities- 2013
Technology Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX
Modemiiation 6ap Levy
Irtipad
�� Portables Yes $6,000,000 Fees � � � � � � �
Property Purctiase - No S2a,000,000 Bond � � � � � � �
1/ 3 New Efementaries& Impact Fee
1 New Middle Schdol
MultipleFacility Yes $46,400,000 Capital � �
Im rovements . Levy
Elementary#15 No $40,880,000 Bond XX XX XX
�/ impactFee lan const o en
Elementary#16 No $a0,880,000 Bond XX XX XX
�/ Impact Fee lan oonst o en
Bond XX XX XX
1/ Middle School#5 No $64,350,000 Impact Fee plan const open
AHS Modemization Yes $tt0,000,000 Bond Issue �
_ o n
1/ These funds may be secured ihrough local bond issues,sale of real property,impact fees,end state matching tunds.
The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elertren(ary school level for new�nshuction. The disMet is eligible for
state matching funds kr modemization.
25
Auburn School District No. 408
Capitai Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section VII
Impact Fees
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACICITIES PLAN
�20751hrough 2021
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2015)
Middle School lt$within 6�.yeaF period
Elementary#15 within 3.year period
Elementary#76�within 4�.year period
I. S/TECOSTPERRESIDENCE
Formula:�((Acres x Cost perAcre/Facil' Size x Student Pactor
Site CosU �FaciliTy Student Generetion Factor CosU CosU�
Acrea e� Aae Capacity Sin-le'family MuIG�Family SingleFamily MuId�,Family '
Elem(K-5)� 12 �5393;774 650 0:1960� 0:0650 $1,424.88 $472.53 �
Middle,Sch(6�-8)� 25 i 5393;774 800 0.0730' i 0.0380 $898.30 $467.61
Sr Hi h(9-12) 40 �$0 1500 0.0940� 0.0220 $0:00 $OAU
ST,323.15 E940.11
IL PERMANENTFACILITYCONSTRUCTIONCOSTPER�RES/DENCE
Fortnula: ((Facility CosUFacili ��Size x�.Student Factbr x(Permanent to Total��.S uare Foota e�Percentage)
Facility Facility %Perm!Sq�FU Student Generation Factor CosV Gostl
Singlefami�y Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single�Pamily MuIH Family �Single Famity Multi�Famil
Elem (K-5) $40,880,000� 650 �0.9626 0:1980 0:0650 $11,865.65 $3,935�.04
Mid Sch(6-�B) $64,3W,000 800 0.9626 0.0730 0:0380 -$5;652.23 �$2,942:25�
Sr Hi h(9-12) �$0 1500 0.9626 0:0940 0:0220 $0.00 �$0:00
E77,577.88 58,877.29
lll. TEMPORARY FACILITY�CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((FacilityLostlFaciliry:5ize}xSWdent�Factbr)x Temporaryio Tolal Square'�Footage Ratlo)
Facility Facility %Temp�Sq�FU StudeniGenerationFactor �CosU CosV
Singlefamily Cost Size Total Sq F.t Single'Pamily Mu16��Family :Single Famity Multi:Famil
Elem(K.-5)� :$150;000 24.8 0.0374 0.1960 0:0650 $44:36- $14:71
MidSch�(6-8) $150,000 30 �0.0374 0;0730 0.0380 $13�.66 -$7.1�1
SbHi�h.(9-12) �$150;000 30 ,0.0374 Oi0940 0:0220 $77:59. �$4i12�
E75:58 E25.94
IV. STATEMATCH�CREDITPER-RES/DENCE
Fofmula: (Boedch IrMex�.x SFI Footage x-District Match�x�Student'Factor)
Boeckh � SPI �Stste ;SludentGeneration}Fador 'CosU CosU
Indez Foofage Match. Sin IelFamil Mutti Family :Singla Family Multi Family. i
Efem(Kr 5)� $200:40 . 90 62.31% �0.1960 � 0.0650 $2,202,69 $730.49
MidSch�(6-B) $200.40 117 62.31% 0.0730 ' 0.0380 $1,066i51 $555.77
StHigh(9-72) $0�.00� i 130 62.37:h. 010940� � 0:0220 $0.00 �.$0.00� �;
j$28920 $1,285.BB
Aubum School�DistdctNo.408 _
CAPITAL FACILI7IES PLAN
zo�9��throu9n�zoz� �
V. -TAXCREDIPPERRESIDENCE�
Formula:��Expressed as��the present value of an annuity
TC=PV(interesfrzte,discount penod;average assd:value xtax rete)
Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Taz Credit Tax Credit
Assd Value Tax Rale Ann Inl Rate Years Sin le-Family . Multi�Famil
�Single Family �$255;116 57�.42 3.68% 10 E2,985.66
MultiPamily $111;737 $1.42 3:68% 10 $1,307.68�
Vl. DEVELOPERPROVIDED�FACILITYCREDIT
Formula: �{Value of$ite�or FacilitylNumber of dwelling units)
Value No.of Units Facility Credit
Single Family $0:00 1 $0.00
Multi Famil $0:00 1 $0.00
FEE PER'UNITIMPACT FEEfr
RECAP Single� Muld
�SUMMARY Family .Famil
Sita Costs. �$2,323.15� $940.14
PermanentlFacilityAonstCosts $17�,517�.88 $8,877.29
Temporary Faciliry Costs $75:59 $25.94
State�Match`Credit ($3,269.20) ($1�,285.66)
Tax Credit ($2;965:66) ($1;307.68)
FEE(No Discount) $13,661��.76 $5,250.02
FEE(50%Diswunt) $6;830��.88 $2,625.01
Less ASD Discount ($1,500.00)
Facility-Credit $0:00� $0.00
Net Fee Oti/lgation a5,330.88� $2,825.01 �
28
i
I
� Aubum�SchoobDisNct�No.A08
EAPITAL,FACI LITI ES±PLAN
2015 through 2021
SINGLE'FAMICY MULTI�FAMICY-
� IMPACTFEE�ELEMENTS�. Elem� I i Mid'Sc6 S�;High Elem. ' Mid!Scti ��SrHigh
� �K-3 i f '6-:8 9-12 K'-6• . i 8-8' 9-12'
, SWtlenfiFactor Single Family—Aubum acWabcbunt(3/15) 0:196 �0.073 0.094 0.065 0.038� i �0.022
, NewFac Capaciry 650 800 7500 650 800 1500
New,'FaciliryCost� ElementaryCosTEstimatesApri12015 $40,880,000� $40,880,000� � $0
� Middle�School Cos1 Estimate Apri12015 �, � $64{350;000 i $64,350,000 ��:
I
� Temp�.RmCapacity ASDDistrictStandardo(Service. 24'8 30 30 24.8 30 30�
� GradesK-5�24.8 and 6-12 @.30.
� Temp Facility Cost Relocalables,induding!site work,set�up;and fumishing $150,000 $150,000 �$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 �� $150,000
Site Acreage �ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 -25� 40 12 i -25 40
Sile CosVAcre ' See below $356,726 $356,728 $356,728 $356.728 � �$356,728 ' $356,728
� � Perm�Sq Footage '� SPI:Rpt#3�dated December 14,2011 1�,695,317 1,695;317 1,895;317 1�,695.317 1,695,317 1,695,317
� Temp Sq.Footage 75 portablesaC8321896 sq.ft.each+TAP 3500 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,900
� Total;Sq Foofaga Sum of Permanent andTemporary above 1,761,217 7;761;217 1,761,217 1,761,217 1;767,217 1,7fi1;217
� %-PermFacilifies Permanent Sq..Footage divided by Tota6Sq.Footage 9626%- 98:26% 9626% 96:26% 96.26% 9626%
j %-Temp Facilities Temporary Sq.Footage divided by Total Sq.Footage 374% 3J4% 374% 3.74% 3�74% 3.74%
, , SPIISq FVStudent From SPI Regulations 90 117 130 90 117 130
� Boeckh Index From�SPl schedule for December 2012 $200.40 $200.40 �$200.40 $200.40 $200.40 �$200.40
� Match%-State From SPI Webpage December2012 62:31% 62:31% 62.31% 62!31°/ �62.31% 62.31°h
. Malch-%-Districl Computed 37.69% 37.69°/ 37.69% 37�.69°/ �37.89% i 37.69°/a
IDistAverAV � KingCountyDepartmentofAssessmentsMarch2015 $255;176 � $255,1�16 $255;116 $717,737 $111;737 � $711-,737
i
I � DebtServTax�Rate��; CurtentFiscalYear �.$1.42 $1.42 $1�.42 �$1.42 $1.42 � $7�.42
I ', G.OBond��IntRate jCurrent�Rate-(Bond��Buyer201ndex�Msrch�2014) �3.68% 3:68% 3.66% �3.68% 3!68% I 3:68%
I
' Slte Cost Pro ecBons •swdenc 9enere��o���es zoiz ro�m�ie-r�mny
� Recen4Property i 'PurcFase �Purchase Purchase� Atljustad ProjecledAnnual Sites: ' LatestDate � Projected�
�� Acquisitions I Acreage Year Price CosVAcre � Pfesenf Day Inflation Factor Required :of Acquisttion; . CosUAcre
� Lakeland I 12.00 2002 �$2,701�,043 $225,087 �$424,435�
' Labredor � �35A0 2008 $7;601;799 $217,194 . i $305;614
. Cakeland�East i �27.00 2009 .$9,092;160 $336,747 � $451,273
Total 74.00 $19,395;002 $262,095 I I$393;774 5.00%. 'Elementary 2017 i $393,774�.
I
I
�
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2015 through 2021
Section VIII
Appendix
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN En�ollment Projections
Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
Auburn School District #408
Student Enrollment Projections
October 2014
Introduction
The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for
forecasting the future. In addition,the`projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant
vanables within tkie data being used. These assumptions aze`judgmental"by definirion. Forecasting
can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the fu[ure,or from the known
to the unknown. The a4tached tabulaz data reviews the history of student enrollment,sets oubsome
quantitative assumptions,and provides projections based on these numerical factors.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological,psychological,economiq
and political factors that are presenf in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces
the assumptions that whatever these individual factorshave been in the past aze present today,and will
be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singulaz factors by avetaging dafa over thirteen
years and six years respecrively. The results provide a u8nd,which reflects a long(13-year)anda shoR
(6-year)base from which to extrapolate.
Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten s;udents have been used. The fust uses the
average increase or decrease oyei ffie past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to eachsucceeding
year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergaztners have been of live births
in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years.
The degree to which the actnals deviate from the projecpons can only be measured after the fact.
This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic
being used to calcula[e future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viabiliry and
credibility of the projections derived by these techniques.
Tables
Table 1—Thirteen Year Historv ofOctober 1 Enrollments—page 3
The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data
shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each yeaz.
Table 2—Historical Factors Used In Proiections-page 4
This table shows the three basicfacto:s derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been
used in the subsequent projecrions: The three factors aze:
e Factor 1—Aveiage Pupil Change Between Grade Levels
This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival." It is a
measure of the number'of pupils gained or lost as they move from one gade leyel to the
next.
e Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level
This factor is the average change at each grade leve]over the 13 or 6-yeaz period.
o Factor 3—Aubum Schoal District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King
County Live Births.
This factorcalculates what percent each kinde;garten class was of the King County live
births in the five previous years. From tliis information has been extrapolated the
kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years.
1
Table3—Prorection Models—pages 5-13
This set of tables urilizes the above menrioned vuiables and generates several projectious.The
models are explained briefly below.
❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projecrion based on ttie 13-yeaz average gain in kindergarten
(Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade leveis (Factor I). The data is
shown for the district as a whole.
❑ Tab]e 3.6(pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3:13 except it
shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.
o Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substimted
for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates aze derived from the King County live births instead
ofthe average gain.
❑ Tables 3E.13,3E.6,3E.13A,3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district
projecrion. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade
articulation.
❑ Tables 3MS.13,3MS.6,3MS.13A,3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 gades&om the
district projection. Summary]evel data is proviiled for percentage gain and pupil o in by
grade articulation.
❑ Tables 3SH.13,3SH.6,3SH.13A, 3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the
district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
❑ Table 4(pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of
comparison.
❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows hoiv well each piojecUon model perfotmed when compared
with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number-and percent fortnats for the
past 13 years.
Summarv
Tlns year is tlie third consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecurive years of
declining enrollment. The increase of 306 students changes oiu historical ayerage gain/loss in
studenu_Over the past 6 years the average gain is now .65%annually,whioh equates to an average
annual gain of 96 smdents.
Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a smnmary of the range of variation between the
four models. This data can be used for planning for future nceds of the district.
The models show changes in the next six years:
• Elemenfary level show increases ranging from 1342 to 1557. (page 7)
• Middle School level show increases ranging from 634 to 747. (page 8)
• High School level show increases ranging from 292 to 413. (page 9)
The models show these changes looking forwazd thirteen years:
• Elementary level show increases rangng from 2486 to 3237. (page 7)
• Middle School level show increases ranging from 494 to 1521. (page 8)
• High School level show increases ranging from 702 to 1598, (page 9)
This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning
stages.
2
AUBURN SCHOOL DIS7RICT STUDENT )CLAAENT PROJECTIONS-October 2014
TABLE Thirfeen Year History of October�1-�Enrdlments(Rev i W14)
� Actual
GRADE 02-03 03-04 04-05 � ' 05-OB OB-07 07-08 OB-09 0&10 10.N � 17-12 � 12-13 13-14 7416
KDG �905 971 892 955 .941 996 998 1032 1070 1029 1098 1170 1232 134
1 900 982 960 963 1012 995 1075 1033 7066 1068 '� 1089 1188 7219 ' 130
2 961 909 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 7016 1097 1083 1124 1196
3 940 998 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1117 7125 1136
4 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 7024 1022 1038 7123 1156
5 1062 1018 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079� 1018 1070 1075 1122
6 1104 1111 1020 1064 1058 10W 1096� 104U 1041 1063 � 1641 1076 �1059
7 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 7034� 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 7091 �
B 1026 1052 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088
9 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275
10 1234 1249 1261 1383� 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238i tA70 � 1278 7229 1169 ..
11 927 1010 1055 1782 1322� 1352 � 1350 1303 1258 . 1233 � 1164 1240� 1211
12 �933 902 886 � 1088 1147 1283 1352 1410 1344 , 1316� 7321 1274 1323 '
TOTACS 13,427 ' 13,702 13;672 � 14,088� 14,478 14;559• � 14;703 14,589 .14�,482 14;363 , 14,596 14,971 16;277
Percent M-Gtin � 2:05% (022)% 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99% (0.78)% (0.73)% (0.82)% 1.62�0 2:57% 2.04%
Bupil Gain 275 (30) 416 330 741 144 (114) (107) (N9) 233 375 308 .
Average°�Gain fa 1 sf 6,years: 1.53% Aoxrage°k Gain for.lasb 6.years 0.65°h �
A�,erage Pupil Gein fw 1st 8 years. -213 Averaqe Pupil Gainior last 6 years 96 '
A�xrage°h Gain fa 13 yeare. 1:09�
Averaga Pu il Gain for 73 years. 154
TABLE
1A GradeGroup.Canbinatims
KDG 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1770 1232
K;1;2 27fi6� 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647
K-5 5741 5774 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061
K-6 6845 6885 6755 6891 7091 7749 7294 7199 724g 7293 7530 7881 8120
1-3 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551
1-5 4836 4852 4843 4832 5092 5148 5200 5127 5198 5201 5397 5635 5829
1-6 5990 5963 5863 5936 6150 6153 6296 6767 6239 6264 6432 6711 -fi888
6-8 3151 3294 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3111 3144 3264 3238
7�-8 2047 2183 2254 2185 2066 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 �2103 2188 2179
7-9 3488 3656 3715 �3544 3458� 3427 336G 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454
9-12 4535 4634 4663 -5032 �5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978
10-12 3094 3161 3202 .3853 :3869 39&3 4043� 3990 3840 $779 �3763 3743 3703
75 p(jt4-15 Page 3 �Oct6ber 2013
i
; AUBURN SCHOOL:DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENTIPROJECTIONS-Octo6er 2014
�
TABCE 'Factas Used in Ptqecdons Facta AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS
2 3 AS FUNCTION OF�IONG COUNTY CNE BIRTH RATES
j CAL- TOTAL VEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN�.KINDERGARTEN ��
' Factor .A�ageFupilCfiargeBetv.eenGratle ENDAR� LNE 2l3tds. � tl3rds OF LIVE � � KDG ENROLIMENT-ASA%OF I
� 1 �Levds YEAR BIRTHS BIRTH& :BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS' ENROLL ADJUSTEDLIVEBIRTNS '
� 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1974 13,493 8,995 4,498 80/81 131524 600 4.436°h
' Kto1 53i50 Kto1 'S4.33 1975 73,540 �9,027 4;513 81/82�� 13,887 �588 4.298%
1!l02 12.67 1��to2 9.17 1978 13,781 9,174 4;587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856%
2to3 14.83� 2to3 5.33 1977 i4,682 �9,786 4;894 83/84 14�,958 666 4.452%
3to4 26.50� 3104 �25.00 1978 75,�96 10,064 5,032 84/85� 16,D48 726 4.524%
4�.to5 22.83� 4to5 11.87 7979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 792 4740%
. 5108 8.08 5106 (3:50) 1980 16,800 71[200 5,600 88I87 17�,000 829 4.876%
8to7 A6.08 6to7 18;17 1981 17,100 N�,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 769 4216%
7:10 8 .10.50 7 to 8 0:17 1982 18.811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18.626 817 4.386°b
8 to 9 233.50 8 to 9 162.33 1983 18,533 12,355 6,778 89f90 18,827 871 .4.626%
9l010 (3775) 9 to 10 1.33 7984 18,974 12,&t9 6;325 90191 19,510 858 4.398%�
j 10toN (62.33) ]Olo,i1 (20.67) 1985 19,778 13,185 8;593 91/92. 19,&93 �909 4.569%
� 11 to 12 19.17 19 to 12 73:33 1986 19,951 13,301 8,650 ' 92/93 21;852 920 �4210% �
. total 317.58 lotal 336.67 1987 22,803 15,202 7�,601 93194 21;624 930 4.307%
� Factor t Is the avarage gain or loss of pupils as lhey 1988 21,034 14,023 7�,071 94/95 24,062 .927 3.853%
move from�one grede le�el ta the next. Facla 1 uses 1989 25,578 17,051 8,525 95l96 26,358 954 3.619%
the ast 12)OR(5)years of changes. 7990 28,749 17,&33 8,976 96l97 24,116 963 3.993°k
1991 22,799 15.199 7�.800 97/98 20,973 978 4.663%
fector Average Pupil Charge By Grade Level 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 . 98/99 21,573 854 3.959°.6
�2 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99l00 22,129 .849 3.837%
13 YEP.R BASE 6 YEP,R BASE 19&1 22,029 74,886 7;343 OOI01 24,013 912 3.798%
K 2725 K 40.00 1995 25,005 18,670 8,335 -07/02 22,717 �846 3724%
1 26.58 1 37:20 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02I03 27;622 -905 4.186%
� 2 19.58 2 39.60 1997 21.646 14,431 7215 03/04 22.023 �922 4.186%
3 16.33 3 i28:60 1998 22,272 74;808 :7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041%
4 15.25 4 16.60 , 1999 22,007 14�,671 7;338 U5/OB 22.327 955 4.277%
5 �5.00 5 78.40 2000 22,487 14;991 7,496 �O6IW 22,014 941 4.274% '
6 (3.75) 6 3i80 2001 21;Z78 14;519 7259 -07/OB 27:835 996 4.582%
7 :5.83 7 (6:80) 2002 21,883 14�.575 7288 08/09 22.242 998 4.487%
, 8 5.17 8 71.40 2003 22,431 14,954 '7,477 09/10 22.726 1032 .4.541%
' 9 (13.83) �, �.9 620 2004 22,874 15,249 7�,625 10/11 22,745 1010 4.441%
70 (5.42) �, 70 (21.60) 2005 22,880 15,120 7;560 11/12 23.723 1029 4.338°,6 Lasl6 �
11 23.67 N (18.40) 2008 24,244 18,163 8,087 72/13 24,683 1099 :4.448% year
12 32.50 12 (17:40) 2007 24,902 16,601 8,30t 13/14 25.094 1162 4.831% .Avenge
Factor 2 isthe�averegechangein�gradeleeelsize 2008 25,190 76,793 8,397 1M15 25,101 1232� Actua/ 4.908% 4.663X'�
hom01l02 OR OS/09.� ' 2009 25,057 18,705 8;352 15/16 24;695 1124� ; �<-Prjdd� year
2010 24.574 18;343 �8,171 16/77 24.591 1120 <-Prjctd' year
, 2011 24,630 16,420 8210 17/78 24,898 H34 �-Pijcld� year
. ' 2012 25,032 18:688 8,344 18118 24,951 1738 i <-Prjcld
I 2013 24,910 A8,607 8,303 19-/20 `numberfromDOH
Source:Center tor Heallh SlaUstics,Washirgton State Departrnent of:Heatth
15' �5 � � OctoMr2013
AUBURNISCNOOL,DISTRICT STUDENT )LLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2014,
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.13 Based�.on�:73YearHistory
ACTUAL �PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ � FROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 14/15 15/i6 i6117 17118 18/19 19/20 20/21� 21122 22123 ' 2324 24-25 25-26 2627 27-28
KDG 1232 1259 1287 1314 1341 1368 1396 1423 14W 1477 1505 1532 1559 1586
1 1219 1286 1313 1340 1367 1395 1422 1449 1476 1504 1531 1558 1585� 1613
2� 1196 1232 1298 1325� 1353 1380 1407 1434 1462� 1489 1516 1543 1571 1598
3� 1736 1211 1247 1313 1340 7366 1395. 1422 1449 1477 7504 1531 1558 1586
4 1156 1163 1237 1273 1340 1367 1394 1427 1449 1476 1503 1530 1556 1585
5 1722 1179 1185 1260 1298 1362 1390 1477 1444 1471 1499 1526 1553 1580
6 7059 1130 1187 1193 1268 1304 1370 1398 1425 1452 1479 1507 1534 1561
7 7091 1075 7146 1203 1210 7284 1320 1387 1414 1441 1468 1496 1523 1550
8� 1088 1102 1086 1157 1214 1220 1295 1331 1397 1424 1452 1479 1506 1533
9 1275 1322 7335 1319 1390 7447 1454 1528 1564 1631 1658 1685 1712 1740
10 U69 1237 1284 7297 1281 1352 1409 1418 1491 1526� 1593 1620 1647 1675
1�1 1211 1107 7175 1221 1235 1219 1290 1347 1353 1428 1464 1530 1556 1585
�12 1323�. 1230 1126. 1194. 1241 7254 1238 1309 1366 1373 1447 1483 1550 1577
TOTALS 15,277 15,531 15,905' 16,410 16,875 17;320 17,779 18281 18;740 19;168. ]9,618 20,020 20,473� 20,767
PeroentoEGain 1�.86°k 2.41% 3.18% 2.83No -2.64% 2.65% 2.82°h 2.51% 229°h 2.35% 2.05Yo 1.97%� 174%
Pupi� Gain 254 374 506 465 -445 459 502 458 429 450 402 894 354
TABLE DISTRICT-PROJECTIONS
3:6 Based'on6YeaGHistay,
ACTUAL 'PROJ P.ROJ �. PROJ PROJ PROJ ; PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROil PROJ �
GRADE 14/15 15I16 i6117 17/18 18119 19/20 � 20/21 21/22� 22123 � 2324 24-25� 2526 26-27 27-28
KDG -1232 �1272 1312 1352 1392 7432 1472 1512 1552 1592 1632 1872 1712 �1752
1 1219 1286 1326 1366 1406 7446 1486 1526 1566 7606 1646 1686 1726 1766
2 1196 1228 1296 1336 1376 1416 1456-. 1496 1536 1576' 1616 1656 1696 1736
& 1136 1201 1234 1301 1347 7381 1421 1461 15D1 1541 1581 1621 1661 1701
4 1156� 1161 1226 1259 1326 1366 1406� 1446 1486 1526 1566 1606 1646 1686
5 1122 1168 1173 1238� 1270 1338 1378 1418 1458 1498 1538 1578 1618 1658
6. 1059 1119 1164 1169 1235 1267 1334 1374 1414 7454 1494 1534 1574 1614
7 1091 1W7 1137 1182 1187 �1253 1285. 1352 1392� 1432 1472 1512� 1552 1592
8 1088 1091 1077 7137 1183 1188 1253 1285 1352 1392 1432 1472 1512� 1552
9 1275 1250 1254 1240 1299 1345 1350 1475 1447 1515 1555 1595 1635 1675
1q 1t69 1276 1252 1255� 1241 1301 1346 1351 1417 1449 1516 1556 1596� 1636 �
11 1271 1148 1256 1231 1234 1220 1280 1326 1331 1396� 1428 1495 1535 1575
12 �1323 1284 1222 1329 .1304 1308 1294 1353 1399 1404 1469 1501 1589'� � -1609
TOTALS 15,277 75,563� 75,927 i "16,394 16,794 � �17,258 ! '17�,759: 16,314 18;850 I 19,380: ,79,944 20;484� 21,031 21,551
PercentofGain �1�.87% �2.34% 2.93% 2.44% �2J6% 2.90% 3.13k 2:92h 2.81% �2:91% 2r71% -2.67°h Z.47%�
Pupil Gain �286 �364 .467 400 .464 507 ��555 536 530 565 539 547 520
15 pry14-15 Page 5 October 2013..
i
i AUBURN SCHUOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROCLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2074
i
TABCE 'DISTRICT BROJECTIONS
3.73A. �Based'�.on$irth�Rates&'13��Year.Nistay. , �
; ACTUAL PROJ PROJ� PROJ� i PROJ PROJ PROJ - PROJ PROJ PROJ� , PROJ ! . PROJ PROJ� PROJ ',
GRADE�� 14/15 15/i6� 1&17 17/1B �, 78119 19/20 '20121 '� 21/22 22/23 2324 � 24-25 ! 2&26� 2fr27' 27-28 ':
K -1232� -1124 1120 7134 1136� .
1 1219 1286� 1178 1173 1167 1190 -
2 1196 1232 1298 1191 1186. 7200 �1202
3 1136 1211 1247 7313 7205' 7201 1215 1217
4 1156� 1163� 1237 1273 1340 1232� 1227 1241 1244
5 1122 1179� 1785 1280 7296 7382 1255 1250 1264 1266
6 1059� 1,130� 1187 1193 1268� 1364� 1370 1263' 9258 1272 1274�
7 1091 1075' 1146 1203 12t0 1284 1320 1387 1279 1274 1288 1291
8 1088� 1702 1088 1157 1214 1220 1295 1331 1397 1269 1285 1299 1301
9 1275 1322� 1335 1319 1390- 1447� 4454 7528 1564 1631 1523 1518 1532 1535 '�.
10 1169 �1237 1284 1297 1261 1352 1409 1418� 1491 1526 1593 1485 1480 7494 '
17 1211 U07 1175 1221 1235 7219 1290 1347 1353 1428 1464 1530 1423 1418
12 1323' 1230 1128 1194 1241 1254� 1238 1309 1366 1373 1447 1483 1550 1442�
TOTALS -15;277 � �15,396 15,603 15,928 16;188
Percent of Gain 0.78% Y.35% 2.09% 1.63%
Pupil Gain 119 207 �325 260
TABIE 'OISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.6A �Based on Birth�Rates&6 Year Histay
, ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ �PROJ PROJ• ! PROJ PROJ PROJ' � PROJ �
GRADE 14/15 75/16 16/17 77/18 78/19 19/20 �20/21 21/22 22123 �23-24 34-25 25r26 -26-27 ' 27-28
KDG 1232 1124 1120 1134 1136 �
1 1219 1286 1179 1174 1188 1190
2 N96 1228 1296 1188 1183� 1197 1200
3 1136 1201 1234 1301 1193� 1188 1202 1205
4 1156 1161 1226 1259 1326 1218 1213 1227� 1230
5 1122 1168: 1173 1238 7270� 7338� 7230 1225' -7239 1242
6 1059 1119: 1164 1169 1235 1267 1334 1226� 1222 1236 1238
7 1097 �1077 1137 1182 1187 725& 1285 1352 1245 �1240 1254 7256
8 1088' 1091 tOZ7 ,1137 1183� N68� 1253 1285� 1352 1245 1240� 9254 1256
9 1275� �1250 1254 1240 1299� 1345� 1350 1415� 1447 1515 1407 1402 1416 1479
10 1169 1276 1252 1255 1247 7301 7346 7357 �1417 1449 1516 1408 1404 1416
11 121.7 1148� 7256 1237' 1234� 1220 1280 1326' 1331 1396 7428� 1495 1388 1383�
12 1323 1284 1222 1329 1304 1308� 1294 1353. 1399 7404 1469 1501 1569 1461
TOTALS'� 15,277 15,415 15;587 15;836 �. 15,979
PerceMof�Gain �0.90% �1.12%. 1i60%. 0.91%
PupiCGtin. 138 172 249 144
15 'S � S Ocir`--2013
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT ST:UDENT �LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2074
�3E.13 Based on 73,Yea�History
GRADE 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18119 19I20 :20121 21/22 22Y13 23-24 2425 2526 2fi27� 27-28
2 7 4 505
1 1219 1286� 1313 1340 1367 1395 1422 1449 1476 1504 1531 1558 1585 1813
2 1196 1232 1298 7325 1353 1380 1407 1434 1462 1489 1516 1543 1571 1588
3 1138 1211 1247 1313 �7340 1369 1395 1422� 1449 1477 1504 1531 1558 1588
4 1156 1163 1237 1273 1340 1387 1394 1421 1449 1478 1503 1530 1558 1585
5 1122 1179 1185 1260 1296 1362 1390 1417 1444 1471 1499 1526� 1553 1580 year year
K-5 TOT � 7061 7329 7567 7825 8037 8239 840.3 6566 8730 8893 9057 9220 9384 g547 1342 2q
er am . .7 1. .
Pupii Gain 268 238 259� 211 203 164 184 164 164 164 164 164 164
T B- �-5 ROJECT
3E.6 �Basedon6Year�History
GR.4DE . iM15 � 15116 16/17 17A8 18/19 19/20 2N21 2V22 22/23 �23-24 2425 25-26 2627 27-28
4
1 1219 1286 7326 1386 1406 1448 1486 1528 1566 1606 7646 1686 1726 7766
2 1196 1228 1286 1336 1376 1478� 1456 1498 7536 1576 1616 1656 7696 1736
3 1136 1201 1234 1301 1341 1381 1421 1481 1501 1541� 1581 7621 1661 1701
4 1156 1161 1226 7258 1326 1368� 1406 144f3 1486 1526 1566 1606 1646 1686
5 1122�� 1168 1]7& 1238� 1270 1338. 1378 1418 1458 1498 1538 1578 1618 1858 year year
K-5 TOT 7067 � 7317 7566. 7851 8111 �&378�. 8618 8858 9098 9338 �9578 9878 10058 70298. 1 7 237
efCen eift 3. o . o . 2.57 2.44
Pu il�.Gain. 256 250 285� 260 267 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
T -5 PROJECT O
3E.13A '�Based an Birth Rates 8 13 Year Histwy
L PRO R J � R J . PROJ PR
GRADE ' 1M15 15/i6 16/17 �17178 18/19, 1W20 � 20/21� 2V22 22/23 23-24 24-25 2526 26-27 27-28
1 1279 1288 1179� 7173 1187 1190
2 1�196� 1232 1298 1191 1186 1200 1202
3 1.136' 1211 1247 1313� 1205 1201 1215 1217
4� 1156 1163 1237 1273 1340 1232 1227 1241 7244
5 1122 1179 1185� 7260� 1296 1362 1255 1250 1264 1266 ytear
K-5 TOT 7081 7194 726& 7344 7350 g
.ercen o. ain o
Pupil Gain 133 �7.7 79 6�
3E.6A Based on BiM�Rates&6 Year;Histary
A - R J : P J RO PROJ RO PROJ PR PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ
GRADE 14/15 15/16��. 18/77 � 17H8 18/19 19/20 2021 21/22 2223 23-24 2425 2526 2fr27 27-28
2
7 1219 1286 1779 7774 1188 1190
2 1196 1228 1296 1188 1183 1197 1200�
3 1136 1201 1234 1301 1193 1788 1202� 1205
�4 1156 1161 iZ26 1259 1328 1218 1'L1& 1'1"27 1'L3U
5 1122 1168 1173 1238 1270 1336 1230. �1225 1239 1242� year
K-5T0T 7061 7189 7226 7293 7298 235
ercen� an . o
Pupil Gain 108 57 6fi. .4
15 prj1415 Pa9e'� Odaber 2013
AIJBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLAAENT PROJECTIONS-October 2014
TABLE MIDDIE SCHQOLPROJECTIONS -
3MS.13 Based on 13 Year Histay
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ . PR0.1 � PROJ PRW PROJ
GRADE 14115 15/16 i6117 17/18 18/79 19I20 20Y21 . 21/22 22/23 23-24 � 2425 �� 2526 26-2Y 27-28
6� 1059 1�130 1167 1793 1268 7304 1370 1398i -1425 1452 7479 15W Y534 1567'�
7 �7091 1075 1146�� 1203 1210 1284 1320 1387 7414 1441 1468 1498� �1523 1550
8�. 1088 1702 1086 1157 �7214 1220. 1295 1331 1397 1424 1452 1479� �1506 1533 � �6 year 13year
6-8 TOT 3238 3307 3419 3553 3691 3808 3985 4115� 4236 4317 4399 M81 4563 4644 ' 747 �1408
Pement of Gain �2.12% 3.39% 3.93% 3.89% 3.17% 4:65% 325% '2.94% ti93°k 1.89%. 7.86% 1.82% 1:79% ,
Pupil Gain 69 112. 134�. 138 117 177 129 121 82 82 82 82 82
TABLE MIDDCE�SCHOOL PROJECTIONS i
3MS.6 Based on 6�Year,His�ory
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ ; PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ �PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ �PROJ PROJ '
GRADE 14/15 15A6 1&17 17I78 � 18/19 19/20 �2(121 21122 2223 23c24 2425 �' 2528 2fr27� 27-28 ��
6 1059 1119 1164 1169 1235� 1267 1334 1374 1414 1454 1494 1534 1574 1614
7 1097 1077 7737 1182 1187 1253 1285 1352� 1392 1432 1472� 1512 1552 1592
8- 1088�. � 1091 1077 1137 7;183 1188� 1253 1285 1352 1392 1432�� 1472 1512 1552 ' 6 year 13year
6-8 TOT 3238� 3287 3378 3488 3604 3707 3872 '� :4011 4159 4279 4399 ' .4519�. 4639 4759 '� 634 ' 1521
PerceM of Gain 1.51°k 278% 328% 3.33°k 2.84% 4.45% 3.60% 3.67% 2.89°� 2.80%� 2.73°h 2.66% 7:59% �
Pu il Gain 49 91 110 116 103. 165 140 147 120 .120. 120 120 120
TABLE MIDDLE�,SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.13A Based�on�.Birih Ralw&13 Year Hist
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRO;I PROJ PROJ PRO;I PROJ PROJ PROJ �PROJ PROJ
GRADE 14/15 15/.i6 1&17 17/18 18/19 19l20 20/21 � 27/22 22123 2&24 2425 25-28 Z6-27 27-28
6 1059� 1730 1187 1193 1268 1364 1370 1283 1258 1272 1274
T 1091 1075. 7146 1203 7270 1284 1320 1387 1279 1274 1288 1291
8 1088�. 1702 7086 ]157 7214. 1220 ]295 1331 1397 1289 1285 1299 1301 � 6 year t0year
6�-,8 TOT 3238. $307 3419 3553 3691 3808 39&5 � �3980 3934 3836 3847 �� 747- 809
Percento(Gain :2.12% 3.39°,6 3;93% 3.89% 3.17°h 4.65°h (0:14)°h (1.15)% (2:50)% 0.30°�
P il�Gain 69� 112 734 138 117� iZ7 (5) (46) (98) 72
TABL'E I MIDDLE'SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.6A �� Basetl on BiAh�Rates&6 Year Hist
'I ACTUAL �PROil PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ�. . PROJ BROJ PROJ PROJ " PROJ �PROJ PROJ
GRADE�! � iM15 15/16 18117 17HB 18/19 79/20 �20/21 ' 21/22 2223 23-24 2425 25-28 2627 27-28 .
6 1059� 1119 1164 1169 1235 1267 1334 7226 7222 1236 1238�
7 1091 � 1W7' 1137 11ffi L187� 1253� 4285 1352 1245 1240 1254 1256'
S 1088 1091 10Z7 1137 1783�. 1188� .1253 1285 1352 7245 1240 1254 1256 ; 6year t0year
8-830T� 3238' 3287 3378 3488 � 3604 37W 3872 ' 3864� -3879 3720 3732 � ! 634 494
PercentofGain 1.51% 2:78% 326%� 3.33% 2.84% 4.45% (0.21)% (1.16)% (2:58)% 0.31%
Pupil Gain 49�� 91 110 116 103� 165 8) (45) (98)� 12
75.� �5 �- '9 October2013
AUBURN SCHOOC DISTRICT'STUDENT )LLMENT PROJECTIONS -Actober2014
TABCE �. SR.,HIGH'pROJECTIONS
�3SH.13 �. Based��onl3YearHislory
�. ACTUAL FROJ PROil PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE��� 14/15 15/16 18/17 ' 17/18 18/19 79/20 � 20/21 27/22. 22123 2324 i 24-25 2526. 26-27 �� 27-28
9 1275 �1322 1335 1319� 1390 1447� 1454 1528 1564 1631 �7658 �1685 1712 1740�
10 1169 1237 1284 1297� 1281 1352 1409 t416 1491 1526 1593 1620 1647 1678
11 1211 1107 1175 1221 1235 1219 1290 1347 1353 1428 1464 1530 1558 1585
12. -1323. 1230 1126�. 1194 1241 1254 1238 1309 1366 1373 1447 1483 1550 1577 6 y�ar 13 year
&12 TOT 4978 4896 4920. ; 5032 5747 5273 5391 -5600 ��5Z74��- 5958 � 6162 6319 6467 6576 413 1598
PBPceMofGain (1.66)% 0.49% 228% 229% �2.44% 225% 3.88°k 3.10% 3.18% 3.43°h 2:54°k 2.35% 1.69%
Pupil Gain (82) 24 N2 115 126 N9 209 174 163 264 157 148 109
TABLE SR.�HIGH PROJECTIONS � �
35H.6� Based on�6�Year.His�ory
ACTUAL �PROJ PROJ . PROJ PROJ�� PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ� �� PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE� 14I15 151i6 16117 '. i �17/18 18/19 19/20 .i . 20/21. 21/22 �22@3 . 2&24 2425 2526 '26-27 �� . 27-28
9�� 1275� 1250 1254 1240' 1299 1345 7350� 1415 1447 1515 1555 1595 1635 1675
10 '1169� -7276 -1252 1255� ,1241 1301 1346� 1351 1417 1449 1576 1556 1596 1636 �
11 1211 1148 1256 1231 1234 1220 7280- 1326 1331� 1396 1428 1495 1535 1575
12 1323� 1284 1222 1329 1304 1306 1294 1353 1399 1404 1469 iWi� 1569 1609 6 year 13yxar
�12 TOT 4978: 4959 4983 . � ��5055� 5079 5173 .5270� 5945 5593 I 5763�� �5968 6147 . 6335 ; 6495 292 1517
PefcentofGain (0.37)% 0.47% 1�.45°k 0.48% 1.66% 1.86% 3.33% 272°� 3.04°h 3.55°h �3,01% 3:05% 2.53%
Pupil Gain (19)� .23. 72- 24 95 96�. 176 148 170 205 179 187 160
TABLE SR„HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SHi13A Based'�onBirth�Rates�&•13YeacHistay �
ACTUAL ��PROJ� PROJ I � BROJ PROJ' �PROJ � BROJ ��PROJ PROJ�� � PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ � PROJ
GRADE 94I75 15/78 1&17 I 17I78� 18119 ' 1W20 . 20121 21122� �22123 23-24 2425� -2526 :. 2627 27-28
9 -1275 1322 1335 1319 1390 1447 1454 9528 1564 1631 1523 1518 1532 7535�
10 1169 1237 12&4 1297 1281 �1352 1409 1416 1491 1526 1593 1485 1480 1494
71 1211 1107 1375 1221 1235 1219 1290 1347 1353 1428� 1A64 1530 1423 7478
12 1323 1230 1126 1194 124Y 7254 1238 1309 1366 1373 1A47 1483 1550 1442 6 year 13 year
g12 TOT 4978 4896 4920 5032 5147 ' 5273 � -5391 5600 5774 5958 6027 6017 ' 5985 �5889 413 911
Percen4ofGain �(7".66)% -0.49Yo ' �228% 2:29°k 2.44% 225% 3.88% 3:10°� 3.78% 1.16°� (0.1�% (0.53)h (1.60)%
Pupil Gafn (82) 24 112 115�� 126 119 209 174. 183 69 (10) (32) (96)
TABLE SR:HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SH.&4 BasedonBirth�Rates�&6�YearHistory -
ACTUAL �PROJ ' .PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ� PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 14/1& 15/i6 �. i6l17 17/78. 18119 I 79/20 20121 21122 22123 23-24 242& �2536 2Cr27 27-28
9 1275 1250 1254 1240 1299 1345 1350 1415 7447 1515 id07 1402� 7416� 1419
10 1169 •1276 1252 1255 1241� 1301 7346 1357 1417 1449 1516 1408 1404 1A18
11 1211 1148 1256 1237 1234� �1220 1280 .7326 1331 1396 1428 1495 1388� 1383
12 1323 1284 1222 1329 1304' 1308 �1294 �.1353 1399 1404 1469 1501 1569� 1461 fi year �, 13 yeer
��9-12 TOT 4978 4959 � ' 4983 5055 5079 I 5173 b270 5445 5593 ; �5763 5620 5807 . 5776 �5680 292� 702�
PErcent�ofGain (0:37)% �0.47°k 7:45% 0:48°h, 1:88% 1:86% 3i33% 2:72% 3.04°k 0.99°k (0:22)% (0.53)% (1.66)%
Bupil Gain (79 23 72 24' 95 98 176� � �148 170 57 (73) (31) (96)�
15 prj14-15 Page 9 Odober 2013
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT ST'UDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2074
� TABCE ; PROJECTION COMPARISONS
4 BVGRADEGROUP
' KINDERGARTEN ! �
� �ACTUAL� i PROJ I, PROJ PROJ PROJ : PROJ� PROJ� PROJ. ; PROil � P.ROJ �PROJ� � PROJ PROJ 'PROJ
GRADE � 14115 � � 15d6 ; 78/77 17/18: 18/19 � 19I20 2W21 �21122 22/23 �; 2324� �2425� 2rr26 ; � 2627 27-28 6year 13.year
i E.13 1232 1259 1287 1374 1347 1368 1396 1423 1450 1477 7505 1532 1559� 1566 164 ' �354
E.6' 1232 7272 1312 1352 1392 1432 1472 1512 1552�� 1592 1632 7672 7712- 1752 240 � �520
, E.13A 1232 7124 7120 1�134 1136. .
E.6A 1232 11241 1120 �1:134 1136
� GRD 1—GRD�5
' iACTUALi PROJ � ��PROJ PROJ � PROJ ' PROJ�• �PROJ PROJ' �� PROJ ' PROJ '�PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
' GRADE . 14N5 � -151.16 � 16/17 77/78� 78119 19/20 20)21 �21I22 22123 . 23-24 2425 2526 � 2627 27-28 6�year 73�year
E.13 5829 - �6069 6280 6512 6696 6871 7007 7144 7280 7416� 7552 7689 7825 �7961 1178� 2132�
E.6 5829 6045 6254 6499 6719 6946 7146 7346 7546 7746 7946 8196 8346' �8546 1317� 2717
i E.13A 5829 6069 6145 6210 8214
� E.6A 5629 6045 6107 6759 6160
I
I GRD6—GRDB
ACTUAL PROJ ' PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ :PROJ PROJ PROJ , PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 14/15 15/16 1&17 17/18� 18/19 . 19/20 20/21 21122 27J23 2324 2425 25�26 2627 27-28 6year 13.year
MS:13 3238 3307 �3419 3553� 3691� 3808 3985 4115 4236 4317 4399 4481 �4563 4�44 747 1406
MS.6 3238 3287 3378 3488 360M1 3707 3872 4011 4159 4279 4399 4519 4639 4759 634 1521�
� MS.13A 3238 3307 3419 3553 3891 3808 3985 3980 3934 9836� 3847 747
� MS.6A 3238 328� 3378 �3488. 3664 3707 3872 3864 3819 3720 3732 834
� GRD,9—GRD12
� ACTUAC PROJ. ; �PROJ '� PROJ �PROJ � PROJ AROJ PROJ� PROJ � � PROJ PROJ PROJ , PROJ PROJ
i GRADE 14175 �15/16 ; 16/17� • ,17/78� 78/19 � 19/20. 20121 21122 �22@3 , I 2324 2425' 25-26 �I 26-27 . 27:28 6year� 13year
� SN.13 4978 4896 4920 �5032 5147 5273 �5391 5600 5774 �5958• 8162 6319 6467 6576 413 1598
i SH.6' 4978 4959 4983 �5055 5079 5173 5270 5445 5593 5763� 5968 6147 6335� 6495: '292 7517
� SH.13A 4978 4898 4920 �5032 5147 5273 5391 5600 5774 5958� 6027 6017 5985'� �5889 413 ��911
�
� , SH.6A 4978 4959 4983 5055 5079 5173 �5270 5445 5593 5763' �5820 5807 5776 5880� �292 702
i . DISTRICT TOTALS
ACTUAL PROJ ' �AROJ � RROJ PROJ, i 'PROJ, BROJ �PROJ� PROJ� i PROJ PROJ PROJ� � PROJ �� PROJ
�� GRADE 14l15 75/16 � 16H7 i , 77/78 18N9 : 19/20- . 20/21 21/22 �22@3 : 23-24 24-25 �2526. �. 2G27 ' 27-28 6.year 13�yeaY �.
�, ! 3.13 15;277 15;531� '15,905. '16;410' .16.675 17,320 �17;Z79� 18,281 18;740 19i168- 19.818 F0,020 :20,473 20;767 2502� 5490
' 3.6 15:277 15,563 15,927 16,394� 18.794 17,258 17,759 18.374 18.850 19;380 19,944 20,484 21��,03Y� �21.551 2482. 6274�
� �. 3.13A 15,277 15,396 15,603. 15,928� 16;188
� 3.6A 15,277 15�,415 �15,587 '15,836 15;979
� �5� �5. C '0� Oct�' �013
i
AUBURN�:SCHOOC UISTRICT STUDENT )LLMENT PROJECTIONS-Dctober 2014
�TABLE � PROJECTION:COMPARISONS -
5� BY GRADE�GROUP
Total = Odober 1 Actual Count AND Prqected Counts Prj 3.13- 13 YEAR HISTORY 8, Using Average KAg Increase
Diff = Numbd Prqection is under(-)or w,er Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using A�erage Kdg Increase
°� = Percent Projection is under(-)or over Actiial Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORV & King Cry Birih Rates
Prj 3.6A- 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty Birth Rates
Gretles �2002-03 200304 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
K�-�5 TWaI Diff °� Total Di(f % Total DiR % Total Diff % TMaI DiH %
ACTUAL 5741 �aoc ��ooc -5774 poc poc �5735 wa mc 5887 �ooc coc �8033 noc na
Prj3E.13 5723� (18) (0.31)Yoi �5655�. (119) (2.06)% �5761 26 0.45% 5750' (137) (2.33)% �5871 (162) (2.69)°k
Prj3E.6' �5735' (6) (0.10)% � 3662 (112) .(1''.94)°� 5821 86 1:50% �5795 (92) (1.56)°� �5921 (112) (1.86)%
Prj3E.13A �5743 2 0.03% ' �5605 (169) (2.93)% ' �5709' (26) (0.45)% -5750 (137) (2.33)% 58G9 (164) (2.72)%
P�j 3E:6A �5776. 35 0.61% '. . •5631 (143) (2.48)% ; �5756 21 0.37% 5784 (103) (175)% 5912 (121) (2.01)%
Grades� �2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 200506 200607
:6-�8 Total Diff % Total Diff °� TMaI Diff % Total Diff 96 Tdal Diff �
ACTUAL �3151 poc -��ooc � -3294 �aa �ooc -3274 icioc nac� � 3169 mc �ooc 3144 �ooc �ooc
Prj 3E.13 3025 (126) (4.00)% 3185 (80) (3.31)% 3274 (60) (1.83)%, �3295 126 3.98% �3131 (13) (0.41)%
Prj3E6� �3011 (140) (4�.44)% 3192 (75) (3.10)% 3216 (58) (1.77)%� 3311 142 4.48°.6 3146 2 0.06°�
Prj 3E.13A 3025 (126) (4:04)% � �3185 (80) (3.31)% �3274 (60) (1.83)% 3295 126 3.98% 3131 (13) (0.41)°k�
Pfj 3E.6A 3011 140 (4.44)% 3192 (75) (3.10)%- 3216 (58) (1.77)%1 �.3311 142 4.46%.. 9146 2 0.06%�
Grades 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
-9-�12 TWa1 Diff °6 Total Diff % To�al Difl °fi Total DiR h Total Diff °h
ACTUAL� 4535 noc ��ooc 4634 �ooc �ooc 4G63 noc �ooc -5032 �ooc �ooc ��5247 �ooc �ooc.
Prj3E.13 4455 (80) (1.76)% 4577 (57) (1.23)% 4630 (33) (071)% 4783 (249) (4.95)% 5085 (156) (2.98)%
Prj3E.6 4476 (59) (1.30)% 4594. (40) (0.86)% 4639 (24) (Oi51)°k� 4769 (263) (523)%� �508fi (155) (2.96)%
Pfj3E.13A 4455 (80) (176)%� 4577 (57) (123)% 4630 (33) (0.71)°k 4783 (249) (4.95)% �5085 (156) (2.98)%
Pry 3E.6A 4476 59). (1�.30)% 4594 (40) (0.86)% 4639 (24) (0.51)% 4769 (263) (523)% �5086 (155) (2.96)°h
AIl 2002-03 200304 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Gratles Total Di% � Total Diff � Tolal Diff � Total DiR % Total DiH Y
ACTUAL 13,427 �ooc �ooc 13,702 wa �ooc �13,672 �ooi �ooc 14,088 �ooc ioa� 14,418 �ooc mi�
P1j 3E.13 13,203 (224) (1.67)°k 13,417 (285) (2.08)% 13,605 (6� (0.49)% 13,828 (260) (1.85)% 14,087 °a
(331) (2.30)/
PfJ3E:6 13,222 (205) (1�.53)°k 13,448 (254) (ti85)% 13,676 .4 0.03% 13,875 (213) (1.51)% 14,753 (265) (1.84)%
Prj3E.13A 13,223 (204) (1.52)°h 13,367 (335) (2.44)% 13,553 (119) (0.87)% 13,828 (260) (1.85)% 14,0&5 (333) (2.31)%
PIj:3E:6A 13.263 (164) (1:22)% 13,417 (285) (2:08)% 13.61q �(61) (0.45)% 13,864 (224) (1.59)°h 14,144 274
( ) (1.90)%
15 prj1445 �Page�17 October�2013
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICS STUDENT ENROCCMENT RROJECTIONS-October2014
TABLE � PRQJEGTIONAOMPARISONS
5 BYGR4DE�GROUP�.(Cmtinue�.
TWaI�= October 1 Aclual CountAND Projected�Caunis Pij.3.13- 73YEAR��HISTORY&Using�Aver�e:Kdgincrease. �
��Dif( = NumbenProjeclionisunder(-)onoverAcWal Prj3:6 - �6YEAR��HISTORY & UsingAverege'Kdglncrease
%.= PercenYP�qection�is"under(-)orover.Actual �Prj3.73A.13�YEAR,HISTORY &�KingCtyBirth�Rates
Prj.3i6A- 6YEAR��HISTORY & KingCty.BirthlRales
Grades �2007-08: 200&09� 2009-10�� 2010-11 2011-12
K-�5 �'� Total ' �DiH °,G Total Diff % Tdal DiR °b Total Diff °h� Tdal Diff �%
ACTUAL �. � 6142 ' mc- �ooc 6198 na �ooc 6159 na� ,�ooc 6208 �ooc �ooc 6230 uoc ��oa-
P�.3E.13 6065 ��� (57) (0:93)% 6179 (19) (0:37)%. 6254 95 7:54°h 6282 74 7.19% 6275 45 0.72%
Prj3E.6 ' 6138 � (4) (0.07)°h 6237 39 0.63% 6294 135 . 2.19% 6323 115 1.85% 6267 37 0.59°k
P�.3E:13A �. 6059 (83) (1�.35)°h 8129 (69) (1.1;1)% 6237 78. 727% 6252 44 0.71% 6266 36 0.58%a
P�3E�.6A 6094� (48) (0:78)% 6172 (26) (0.42)%. 6284 .105' 170Yo 6269 61 0.98% 6260 30 0.48%
Grades 20W-OS� 200&09 2003-04 2014N 2011'-12�
6-8 Tdal Difl % Total D"rff % Total Diff % TWaI Difl % TMaI Diff %
ACTUAL , 3097 xoc mc 3206 �ooc �ooc 3196 �ooc �mc� 3213 wa .x�oc 3141 �ooc �oa
Prj�3E.13 3707 10 0.32% 3179 (2� (0.84)% 3242 48 1.44% 3234 27 0.65°� 3221 80 2.55°h
Prj3E.8 3176 � 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34)% 3243 47 1.47% 3236 23 D.72°,6 3211 70 223%
Prj 3E.13A 3107 70 0:32% 3179 (2� (0.84)°/ 3242 46 1.44% "3234 21 0.65% 3221 80 2.55°h
Prj3E.6A' 3116 19 0.61% 3195 �(11) (0.34)% 3243 47 1.47% 3236 23 0J2% 3311 70 223%
G�ades 2007-08 200809 20D361 2010.11 � 2011-17
9-12 TWaI :Diff :h TMaI Diff % Total Diff h TMaI Diff % Totel Diff %
ACTUAL 5320 �oa xoc 5299 na �oot 5234 wa ��ooc�� 5061 �ooc �ooc� 4992 �ooc �ooc
Pry3E:13 5190 '(130) (2.44)°h ��5129 (170) (321)% 5074 (160) (3.06)°h 4921 (140) (2:77)°h 4901 (91) (1.82)%
R�j3E:8 5192 (128) �(2:41)%� ��5755 (144) (2.72)% 5128 (106) (2.03)% 5027 {34) (0.67)% 5017 25 0.50%
Pry�3E:13A 5790 (130) �(2.44)% 5129 (170) (3:21)%. 5074 (160) (3.06)°h 4921 (140) (2:77)% 4907 �(91) (1.82)%
Prj3E:6A 5792 ,(128) (2.41)°/a ��5155 (144) (2:72)% 5129 (105) (2.01)% 5027 �(34) (0.67)% �5017 25 0.50%
AII' 2007-08 2008-09 2003-04 201411 2017-72�.
Grades Total •Diff % Total Diff °h Total Diff �% Total Diff °� Total Diff %�
ACTUAL 14;559 �ooc noc � -14,703 �oa ioa 93,672 wa -��oac� 14,482 �ooc ��ooc� 14,363 wa �ooc
Ptj�3Ei13 74;382 ' (177) �(122)°h �, 73,499 (173) (8.79)% 14,570 898 6.57% 14,437 (45) (0.31)% '14,397 34 0.24%
P�3E.6 74,448 (143) (078)% 13,542 (130) Q:90)% 14,665 993� 726% 14,586 104� 0:72°k: 14,495 �132 0.92%
P�j3E.13A 14;356 �.(203) (1i39)% 13,447 (225) (8:54)% 14.553 881 6.44% 14,407 (75) (0:52)% 14,388 25 0:17°h
Rry3E:6A 74,402 (157) �(1�.08)% � 13,510 (162) (8.11)% 14,636 964� 7.05% 14,533 50 0.35% 94,488 12B 0.87% �
15� 'S �p' '2 Otlr"�-°013
AUBURN SCHOOL DI$TRICT STUDENT )LLMENT`PROJECTIONS-October 2014
TABLE PROJECTION�COMPARISONS
5 BYGRADEGROUP�(Continuc��
Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Prqected Counts Prj 3.13- 13 YEAR HISTORV & Using Averege�Kdg Increase
Diff = Number Prqection is�untler(-)or over ACWaI Pry 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY�& Using Average Kdg Increase
% = Percent Projection is under(-)or a,Er Actual Prj3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY &.King Cty BiAh Rates
Prj 3.6A- 8 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty Birih Rates
Grades 2012-13 2013-14 201415 AJerage. Average ' Hislaical Data is grouped by
K-5 Total Diff °,6 Tolal D'rff °k Total DiH % Difl % K-5;6-8,&12 articulation
- ACTUAL 6489 � �ooc� mc 6805 �oa �ooc 7061 mc �ooc �ooc � �ooc pattern.
P�3E.13 6372 � {117) (1.80)°k 6659 (146) (2.15)% 7052 (9) (0.13)% (33) '., (0.68)%
Pry,3E:6 6368 -(121) (1,86)% 6632 (173) (2.54)% 704fi (15) (0.21)% (8) ' (026)% � AAiculationpatternhasno
Prj�.3E.13A � :63AG; (743) (2.20)°h 6643 (162) (2.38)% 6979 (82) (1.16)% (56) ; (1.08)% nume/ic impact on�cacy
Prj,3E.6A, � 6339 (150) (2.31)°/ 6671 (194) (2.85)% 6966 (95) (7.35)% (37) � (0:75)% of projection modHs.
Grades 2012=13 201&14 2014-15 A�xrage� Averege��
6-8 Total Diff % Total Diff k Total OiR °�. Diff � °h
ACTUAL 3144 ��ooc �ooc 3264 �ooc �ooc� 3238 ��ooc x�c �ooc � �oac
P��3E:13 ' �3143 (7) (0.03)% 3230 (34) (1.04)% 3256 18- 0.56Yo (3) (0.15)%
P�3E.6 ' 3132. (12) (0.38)% 3213 (51) (1.56)% 3246 8 0.25% (2) � '(0.14)%
Pry3E.13A" 3143 (1) (0.03)% . 3230 (34) (1.04)% 3256� 18 -0.56%� (3) � �.(0.15)°h - .
P�3E.6A.' �3132 (12) (0.38)% 3213 (51) (1.56)% 3246 8 025°k (2) ,(0.14)%
Grades ,2012=13 2013-14 2014-15 A�age� ��.Averqqe
9-12� Total Ddf °b Total Oiff °h Total Diff % Diff �%
ACTUAL 4963 �ooc �ooc 4902� �ooc -��ooc .4978 �oac �ooc noc �ooc
Prj3E.13 4813 (150) (3.02)°h 4773 (129) (2.63)°� 4874 (104) (2.09)%� (115) ;(2.51)%
PrJ 3E.6 4906- (57) (1.15)h 4856 (46) (0.94)% 4956 (22) (0.44)%� (7� (1.59)%
Prj3E.13A 4813� (150) (3.02)% 4773 (129) (2.63% 4874 104
) , ( ) (z:os�i ���5� {z.ei�v
Prj3E.6A 4906 (57) (1.15)% .4856 (46) (0.94)% � 4956 (22) (0.44)% p7) (1.59)%
All 2012-13 201314 201415 � �A�,erage Averege
Gratles� Total Diff k Total Diff % Total Diff h -Diff %
ACTUAL 14.596 . �ooc �ooc 14.971 �aac �woc . 15,277 �ooc mi � �. - �ooc
Prj3E.13 �14.328 (268) (1.84)% ' 14,662: (309) (2.06)% 1$;182 (95)� (0.62)%; (100) (1�22)%
Pry3E.8� 14,406 (190) (7.30)% , 74,707 (270) (1.80)k , 15,248 (29) (0.19)%�� (34) (0.75)%
Pri 3E.13A 14,302 (294) (2.01)% � 14.646• (325) (2.17)%�� ' 75r109�. (168) (1i10)°h�� {726) (1.39)%
Ff{3E.BA 14,377 (218) (1.50)°k ; 14.680 (291) �(7:9A)% i , 15;168- (109) (0:71)%i (62) (0.95)%.
15 prj1415 Page 13. OCtober 2013
Appendix A:2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Enrollment Projections
Buildout Data focEnro Projections-ApriF2015
BASE DATA-BUItDOUT SCHEDULE Student GeneratiomFactors:
�ASSUMPTIONS: , Aubum Factors Single �Multi-
1 Uses Build OutesUmates received fiom.developers. ' 2015�SF 2075 MF Famity Family
2 StudentGeneretionFactars�areupdafedAuburndata:for2015as�al/owedperK/ng�CountyOrd/nance Eiementary 0.1960 0.0650
3 Takes area�labe/ed Lakelandand�.KeiseyProjectsprojects:across 20f5-2021 Middle:School 0.0730 0.0380
4 Takes area/abeledBiidges and otheiLea Hill:area��developments.and proJects-across 2015-2021 Senior High 0.0940 0.0220
5 .Includes known�developments.in N.Au6urn and�other non-Lea Hill and non-Lake/and.developments Total 0.3630 0.1250
Tab/e . Aubum Schoo/Distr
1 Develo ment 2015 2016 2017 2015 2019 2020 2021 Total�
Lakeiand/Kersey Single��Family 0 125 75 75� 60 31 -366�
Lea Hill Area Single�Family 260 100 75 50 �50 27 25 587
OtherSin le Famil �Units 19 _50 50 50 25 22 -216
' Total Single Famil Uniis 279, 275 200 175� 135 80 25� 1169
Pro'ected Pu ils:� �
Elementary Pupils K5 55 •54 39 34 �26 16 5 �229
MidSchool.Pupils. 6-8 20� '20 15 13� 10 6 2 S5
Sc�High�Bupils � 9-12 26 26 19 �16 13 �8 2� 110�
�Totaf �K-12 101 100 73 64 49 29 9� 424.
Multi'�Famil Units 0 �50 200 100 50 �0 0� 40D
Total Multi Famil Units 0 �50 200 100 �50 �0 0- 400
Pro'ected���Pu pils> �
�Elementary Pupils K-5 0 3 13 7� 3 ��0 0� 26
Mid!SchooliPupils 6-8 0 2 :8 4� �� 2 �0 0: 15
Sr.:High�Pupils �9-12 � 0� 1�� ���4 2 1� 0 0� g
� Total K=12 0� 6 25 13 6 �0 0� 50
Total Housin �Units 279 325 400 2Z5 185 .80 25 1569
�Elementary Pupils K-5 55 57 52 41 30 16 5 �255
�Mid��School Pupils� 6-8 20 22 �22 17 12 6 2 101
Sr.�High�Pupils� 9-12 � 26 27 �23 19 14" �8 2 119�
Total K-12 101 106 -98 76 55 -29 9 474-
Cumulative Pro ection: 2015-16 12016-17' 2017=18 2018-19 ��2019-20� 2020-21 2021-22
Elementary-Grades'K-5 � 55 112� 164 205 235 250 255
Mid School-�Grades��6-:8 20 42 65 81 93� '99 �101
� � `Senior�High-Grades 9- 12 26 53 76 95 109� 116 119
Total 101 207 305 361 436� .485� 474
45
Buildout Data for EnrollmentProjections-Apri1 2015
TABLE�; New Projects-Annual New:Pupils.Added S;Distributed
2 �. ti GFade Level
� 6 Year Percent-of average
GRADE I q�erage� Pupils�•by�Grade 2014-15 201516 2016-17 2017-18- 2018-19 �� 2019-20 �2020-21 2021-22
� �Enroll: &Level�..
KDG 1095 7.44°h 1232� '8 ]5 23 �:28 32 35� �35
1 7111 7:55% 1219' 8 16 23 �29 33� 35� �.36
2 1086' 7.38% -44.72% 7196' 7 •15 23� 28 32 $4 35
3 1062 7.22°k 1136! 7 �15 22�� 28 31 34� �34
4 1073 7.29�d 1156� 7 15 22 -28 32 34� �35
5 1066 7.24°k 1122 7 15 22 28 32 34� �34
-6- 1053 7.16°k 1059: 7 15 22 27 31 33 34
7 1078 7.32% 21.74°k 1091 7 15 22� 28 32. 34 35
8� 1068� 7.26% 1088� 7 15 22 ��28 32- 34 34
9 1229' 8:35% 1275' 'S 17 25 32 36� 39 40
10 1227� 8.34% 34.13% 1169' �8 17 25� 32 36 39 40
11 1235 6.39°/a 121�1 -8 17 26 32 37 39 40
12 1331 9.05°/a 1323 9 19 28 34 39 42 43
Totals 14713 100.00°/a Total 15277 101 207 305 381� 436 465 474
TABLE 6 year Historical:Data
� 3 Avera e EnrollmeM�and Percenta eDistributed��b� Grade Level
G�ade os-to iaii 71-72 12-13 13-14 ; 14-15 $ i.Ave "/o I
� KDG 1032� � 1010 1029 1098 1170 ! � 1232 1095:17� 7:44% �
� 1 1033 ' 1066 1068 1089 1188 ' 1219 1110:50 7'.55% '
. 2- �998 1016 t097 1083 1124� � 1,196 1085�`.67. 7.38% :
� 3� '993 1013 996� 1.tA1 1;125 � 1136 1062f33 7�22% �.
4�� 1073 -1024 1022 7038 1•123 .' � 1156 :1072167 729% '
5 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075' ,� �1�122 1065':67. 724% ��.
� 6� Q040 � 1041 1063 1041 1076� '� 1059 � 1053i33 7A6% I
7- 1125 7060 1032 1086 1072 i � 1091 � 1077:67 7i32%� �.
� 8' 1031 11:12 1046� 1017 . 1�116 i �1088 1068:33 726% ;
i 9 1244 1221 1273. 1200 1�159 i 1275 1228.67 8.35% i
j 10 1277 � 1238 1170. __ _ 1278 1229 I 1;169 � 1226i83 8:34%� :
� 11 1303 � "7258 1233 . �1:164� ]240 � 1211 1234:83 8:39"h �, '
' � 12� 1410� �, �1344 1316� - �132�1 1274� i � 1323 .1331:33 9:05% �
Tolals ,14589' ' 14482 14383 14596 9�4971 ', �1527,7 �14713t00 -100l00% -
� %�of�changel -0.73% -0.82% 1t62% 2.57% � 2.04%
� change�+/-I .(107) (119) ��233 375. ! 306
i
Buildout Data for Enro Projections-April 2015'
TABLE 4' New Projects�:-.Pupil:Projectlon Cumulative
ND 3.13 by Grede Level U dated'A riII2015. �
Uses a 'cohortsurvival' GRADE 2014�-15 � 2015-16 �2016-17 2017-18'� 2D18-19 -2019-20 2020-2t; 2021--22 �
mode/assuming 100YO of Actual , �Pro'ected Pro'ected' Pro'ected� Pro'ecied Bto'ected� Projectedi Pro'ected
prevlous yearnew KDG 1232 � 1267 1302 1336 1369 1401 1430 1458
enrollees move to the next 1 1219 � 1293 1325 1363 1396 1427 1457 1485
gradeleveL �2 1�196 1239 1313 1348 1381 1412 1441 1469
3 1136 , 1218 1261 1335 1368 1399 1428 1456
Kindergarten calculates 4 1.156 �, 1170 1252 1295 1367 1399 1428 1456
previous years number plus �5 1122 1156 1200 1282 1323 1394 1423 1451
K-5 7061 �� 7373 7658�. 7980 8205 :6432 8608 8776
Currentgeneration based on 6 1059 � 1137 1202 1215 1296 1335 1404 1432
%oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1091 , 1083 1161 1225 1237 1316 1354 1421
factor�uses100%cohort 8 1088 � 1109 1101 1179 1241 1252 1329 1365
survival; based on 6 year GR 6-8 3238 3329 3464 3619 3774 3903 4086� 4218
history. 9 1275 1330 1352 1345 1422 1483 1492 1568
10 1169 � 1246 1301 1323 13:13 1389 1448 1455
� 11 ,1211 �� 1115 1192 1247 1267 1256 1329 1387 _
12 1323 1239 1145 .1222� �1275 1294 1280 1352
GR 9-12 4978� 4930 ' 4990 5136 . 52Z7 i �5424 5550�� 5762 �
Total� 15277 � 15632 � 161.12 16Z15� 17256 � 17,756 18244 -18756� .
%of change' 2.32% . 3:07% 3.74% 3.23°h , 2'.90% 275% '2.80%
change�+/- 355 480 603 541� 501 488. 571:
TABLE 5'� NewlProjects-Pupi6ProjectiomCumulative �
ND 3:6 b Grede;Level U dated A� riC2075
Uses a 'cohort su[vival` GRADE 2014-15 2015-16 � 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 � 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22� 2022-23 2023-24
model assuming 100%of�� Actual�. Pro'ected� 'Pro'ected Pro'ected'� Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected� Pro'ected' �Proected ��Pro'ected
p[evfous year new KDG 1232 1280 1327 1375� 1420 1464 1507 1547 � 1565 1583
enrollees move�.to!the next 1' 1219 1294 1342 1389 1435 1479 1521 1562 1580 1598
grade level. 2 1196 1236 1311 1358 1404 1448 1490 1531 1548 1565
3 1136� 1209 1248 1323 1368 1412 1454 1495 1592 1529
Kindergarten calculates 4 1156� 1168 1241 1281 1354 1398 1440 1480 1497 1514
previous years number plus 5 1122' 1175 1188 1260 1298� 1369 1411 1452 1468 1485
K-5 �7061 736Y �� 7658 � 7986• 8279 8570 8823 9067 9170 ��. 92Z4
Currentgeneration based�on 6 1059� 1:126 1179 1191 �1262� 1298 1367 1405 1424 1440
%oftotalenrollment. Other 7 � 1091 10$5 1152 1205 1215� �1285 7319� 1387 1403 1419
faCtorUSeS 100%cohort 8 1088 1099 1092 1159 1210 1219 1287 1319 1334 1350
survival; based on 6�year ' GR'8-8 � �3238' 3309 �i 3423 " 3555 368T 3802 �3973 4114: 416U ' � 4208 .
history. 9 j �1275 1259� 1271 1265 1331 1381 1389 1455 1471� 1488
� 10: ; 1169 ,1285' �1269 1280 •1273 1337 1385 1391 1407 1422
� ��� i 121:1 �1.157 1273 1257 1266 1257 1319 1365� 1381 -1396 -
12� I 1323 1293'� 1240 1357 ,1339 1347 1336 1396�� 1412 1428
�GR�9-12 I 4978 4994�� 5053 ', �5159 �5209 5322 I 'S428 5607 5671� I 5735
� Total I 15277 15664 16134 ! 16699 17175 17694 I 18224 � 18789' �19002� ! �. 19217 �
%-oficha�ge '2.53% 3.00% - i 3:50°h . 2:85% 3.03% �. '. 3!00% 3.10% 1:14% 7:14% ��
chan e+�- 387- 470 �585 478 520 I � �530 564� 213 216
47
Buitdout Data for EnrollmentProjections-April 2015
�� TABLE�6 New Deyelopments-:Pupll Brojection,Cumulative
' NDa.13A b�:Grade Level U ated,A ri1:2015
. Uses:a'cohort:surviva/'� GRADE 2014-15� 2015-16 i 2016,17 .2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21� 2021-22 i �
. modehassuming100%of� Actual� Pro'ected� ;Pro'ectetl Pro'ected� Pro'ected� �Proected Proected� Proected' ;
� prevlous yeannew KOG. 1232 1132 1135 1156' 1164
enrollees�move to�the;next 1 1219 � 1293 1194 1196� 1216 1222
� grade level; 2 1496 1239 1313 1213� 1294 1232 1237
3 �1�136 1248 1261 1335'� 1233 1232 1248'� 1251��
i Kindergarten calculates 4 1A56 1�170 1252 7295� 1367 1264 1261 1276 �
, birth rate average plus 5 1:122 1]86 1200 �1282� 1923 1394 1288 1284
, 7061; 7238 ; 7356 7478 7518 I 6344 5034� 381T
� ���. Gurcentgeneration based on 6 1059 1:137 1202 1215; 1296 1335 �1404 1297
' °/a�of��total enrollment Other 7 1091� 1083 116] 1225 1237 1316 1354 1421
factoruses 100%�cohort 8 1088 1-109 1101 �1179 �1241 1252 �1329 �1365 -
� ' survival, based on 6'year 3238 3329 -3464 3619� 3774 : 8903. 4086� 4083
� � history. �9 1275 �1330 1352� 9345 �9422 1483 7492� 1568 �
� 10 1169 1246 1309 �1323 1313 1389 1448 �1455
� 11 1211 tA15 1192 1247 1267 1256 1329 �1387
' 12 1323 1239 1145 1222 1275 1294 1280 1352
. 4978 4930 �4990 5136� 5277 � 5421 5550 � 5762
Total 15277 . 15497 15810 16233 16569
' %a of change: 1.44% 2A2% �2.68% 2.07°h
� change+ly �220 313 423 336
� 'TABLE 7 New ProJects.-Pupil:Projection Cumulative
ND3:6A b Grede Level U dated A ri62015
. Uses a 'cohort survival' GRAD6 2014-15 � 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 � 2018-19 �2019-20 2020=21 2021-22
� �model assuming 100'/0 of Actual � Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ectedi Pro'ected Bro ected� Pro'eotedl Pro'ected
� previous year new KDG 1232 1432 1135 1156 �t164
� �enrollees move�to:the:next 1 1219 � 1294 1194� 1�197 -1217 1223
� 'grade level: �.2 -1�196 � �1236 131.1 1210 1211 1229- 1234
�� �3 1�136 �, 1209 1248. 1323 1221 1220 1236 1239
� Kindergarten calculates 4 1�156 ' 1.168 1241 �1281. 1354 1250• 1247 1262
, birth!rate average plus�. ��.5 T:122 I 11Z5 1188� 1260 1298 1369 1264 1260
:7061 i 7214 7318: 7427 I �7464 �
Currentgeneration based on 8 1059 j 1126 1179' 119t 1262 1298� 1387 1260
"/o of:totalenrollment, Other 7 '1091 I 1085 1152 1205 1215 1285: 1319, 1387
factoruses 100%cohort� �8 1068 � 1099 1092� 1159 1210 1219�� 1287 �1319
suryivai, based�on 6 year 3238 ; '3309 3423' 3555 ' ' 3687 -3802� 3973 I �.396Z
hlstory. �9 1275 I -1259 1271 1265 '1331 1381 1389 1455
10 �1�169 i 1285 1269� 1Y80 1273 1337 1385 1399
11 �121�1 ' �1157 1273� 1257 1266 1257 1319 �1385
12 1323 � '. 1293 1240� 1357 �1339 1347 1336 1396
4978 � ' 4994 5053� 5159 I � 5209 5322� 5428 i �� 'S607
Toial '� '152Z7 i ' 15516 :15794 16141 I '�� 16360
. %ofchangei 1.57% 7.79°� 2.19% ' 1:36%.
change+/-' �� B 2 I �
Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey
Auburn School.District
Development'Growth�since 1/1/09
SINGLE FAMILY APri12015
; Actual Students �Sludenl Generation�Factors
n s urren o, e
Develo ment!Name: Parcels Adcu anc Occu ied ; Elem Middle HS Total Elem ',Middle iHS Total�
i
Beaver Meadows �60 60 0 � 12 9 12 33 �� �0:200 �:0:150 A.200 0:550 �
BrandonMeadows 55 55 0 � 17 �7 7 31 � 0:309 �0.127 �0.127 Ot564 '
Brid es 386 190 196 ! 21 7 14 42 �� 0:1�11 �0.037 �0.074 0�:221
i
Carrin 'ton'�Pointe 24 24 0 � 7 2 1 10 0:292 0�.083 ��0:042 0:417
Greenac2s� 16 16 0 , �5 4 3 12 �. 0313 �0250 Ai188 0�750.
KendalllRid e � 106 96 10 ' 17 4 7 28 i 0.17Z �0.042 �0:073 0:292
� Lakeland East: PoRola 130 �130 0 31 14 17 62 ; 0i238 A:108 �Oi131 0.477
� Lakela�d: Ed eview 373 373 0 33 5 12 50 ' 0:088 �0[013 A.032 0.934
, Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 78 0 51 13 14 78 . 0:671 0.171 �0.184 1i026
� Lakeland:Villas At ... 81 81 0 12 2 6 20 � 0.148 0:025 0:074 0.247
�� Lakeland:Vista�:Hei hts 125 125 0 . 33 16 �23 72 � 0:264 .0:128 A:184 0:576
' Lawson Place 14 14 0 7 3 3 13 0.500 Oi214 �0214 0:929
� Montere �Park� 239 220 19 ' 22 12 11� 45 0:100 0':055 0.050 0.205
Sonata.Hills tormed Biandon Place 76 24 54 4 3 2 9 Oi167 0:125 0l083 0.375
Stedin Court .8 8 0 3 1 2 6 0.375 0:125 0;250 0J50
� Trail'Run � 169 169 D 49 17 20 86 0290 0�101 . 0:1�18 0.509
Vinta e Place 25 25 0 ' 6 4 4 14 Oi240 O[160 0:160 0.580
Totals 1965 1686 279 � 330 123 158 61,1 Oi796 0:073 0!094 0.362
�
i
115
I
Aubum : �I District
Development Growth since�7N/09
. Aprll 2015
Current-Constructlon.to�be Occu Ied�2015 qctuai studen�s Estimaled Sfuden[s 8ased on
Units/ � Current To Be ' i StudenbGeneralioo Factors
Development Name Parcels' Occu anc Occu ied �Elem Middle HS. ' 7'otal em e 5 Tota
Brid es �386 �. 190 196 12 1�4 '. 4 30 38 14 18 71
Kenda�6Rid e� 106 � ��96 10 7 3 ' 5 15 2 1 1 4
Montere Park 239 ' 220 19 22 12 � 19 45 4 1 2 7
SonataHills formen BrendonPlace 78 24 54 q 3 2 9 11 4 5 20
Totals �809 530 279 45 32 � 22 99 �55 �20 �26 101
Planned Develo ments Estimated Sludents Based on
UNts/ Current TO BB Student Ganeration Facrors
Develo ment�Name Parcels Occu anc Occu led Elem Middle HS Total
Alicia Glenn 24 0 24 5 2 2 9
Aniierson Acres 14 0 14 3 1 1 5
Backbone Rid e 7 0 7 � � � 3
Bridle Estates 18 0 18 4 1 2 7
Cam-West 154 0 154 30 1� 14 56
Hazel liei hts 22 0 22 4 2 2 8
Hazel View 20 0 20 4 1 2 7
Lakeland: Forest Glen At .. 30 0 30 6 2 3 11
Lakeland Flills Estates 66 66 13 5 6 24
Lakeland: Park Rid e 256 0 256 50 19 24 ' 93
Lakeland: RiverRock 14 0 14 3 1 1 5
Me an's Meadows 9 0 9 2 1 1 3
Mountain View 55 0 55 1.1 4 5 20
New Mo e Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 2 1 1 3
Pacific Lane 11 p 11 2 � � q
Rid e At Tall'Timbers 104 0 104 20 S 10 38
S encer Place 13 0 13 3 1 7 5
Vista Center tormed Estes Park 3'I 0 31 6 2 3 11
Willbw Place 18 0 18 4 1 ' 2 7
Yates Plat 16 0 16 3 ' 1 . 1 ', 6
890 890 Totals 2015 and up 174 65 83 323
Grand.Totals 229 85 1�10 424
� 5� 5/5/2074
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/09
ApriP2015
MULTI FAMILY
. UDItSf CUReOt To Be. � Student GeneraUon Facrors
� Rev.elo mentiName Parceis Occu anc Occu ied � Elem Middle HS Total' , Elem i Middle HS Total '
�
' Lakeland:(Fou[LakesA ts 234 234 0 6 7 4 17 , 0:026 0.030 0:017 0.073
', Le end Townhom8s 11 11 0 � 1 t, 1 3 I 0.091 0.09] 0:091 0273
PacificAve.Duplexes 12 12 0 5 2 0 7i 0.417, 0:167 0:000 0.583
Traif Run l'ownhomes 115 115 0 12 4 3 19 ' O.A04 0.035 0:026 0.165
372 372 0 24 14 8 46 , O1065� 0.038 0:022 0.124
�Planned Develo ment
"D" Street'Plat 32 0 32 2 1 1 4
Promenade:Apts
' (formedy Aubum Hins) 320 0 320 21 12 7 40
Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 3 2 1 6
400 400 Towl 26 15 9 49
i/5/2015
�,v � u � � .
SCHOOL DISTRICi
ENGAGE • EDUCATE• EMPOWER
November 17, 2015
Mi. Jeff Dixon
City of Auburn
25 W. Main Sh�eet
AuBurn, WA 98001
Re: Single Fanuly Residence Impact Fee Increase
Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2015 to 2021
Dear Mr. Dixon,
Aubuin School District respectfully reqnests that the Single Family Residence Impact Fee be
increased to $5,330.88. The Multi-Family Residence Impact Fee is proposed to lie reduced to
$2,625.01.
This year's Impact Fees are calculated using the following formula and amounts:
Single Familv Multi-Familv
Site Costs $2;323.15 $940.14
Permarient Facility Const. Costs $17,517.88 $6,877.29
Temporary Facility Costs $ 75.59 $ 25.94
Slate Match Credit ($3,269.20) ($1;285.66)
Tax Credit 2 985.66 ($1,307.68)
Fee without Discount $ 13,661.76 $5,250.02
50% Discount ($6,830.88) ($2,625.01)
Fee with Discount $6,830.88 $2,625.01
Auburn School District Discount ($1,500.00) $( 0.001
Net Fee Obligation $5,330.88 $2,625.01
Last year's Single Family Impact Fee decreased by 24% from the previous three year's Impact
Fees due to an unusually low student generation factor caused by three new developments that
were generating very few studepts. The students generated by these thi•ee developments Has
increased this year to a more typical level.
James P. Fugate Administration Building•915 Fourth Street NE•Auburn,WA 98002-4499•253-931-4900
Single Family Residence Impact F8e Increase
Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan_ for 2015 to,2021
Page 2
Our Single Family Impact Fees for the past few years have been:
2012 $5,55730
2013 $5,511.69
2014 $5,398.93
2015 $4,137:21
2016 (proposed) $5,330.88
The proposed Single Family Impact Fee is $226.421ess than the Impact Fee for 2012.
Your considerauon and approval of our request will bg:appreciated.
Sincerely,
��, �
��
Bob Kenworthy
Asst. Directqr, Capital Projects
Cc: C. Blansfield
�JamesP. Fugate Administration Building•915 FourthStreet NE •Aubum, WA 98002-4499�253-931-4900
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period
Description of Proposal:
This threshold determination analyzes the environmental unpacts associated with the
following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they aze in effect a single course
of action:
1. The adoption of the Auburn School DistricPs Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2021 by
the Aubum School District No. 408 for tlie purposes of planniug for the facilities needs of the
District;
2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities af
Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2021 as
part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan; and
3. The potential amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the cities oF Algona,
Black Diamond, and Pacific to include the Aubum School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2015-
2021 as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdicrion's Comprehensive Plan.
Ptoponent: Auburn School District No. 408
Location of the Proposal: '
The.Auburn School District includes an azea of approxixnately 62 square miles. Po;tions
of unincorporated King County and the cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and
Pacific fall within the DistricYs boundaries.
Lead Agency:
Aubum School District No. 408
The lead agency for this proposal has deteriiiined thatthe proposal does not have a
probable significant adverse environmental impact on the enyiropment. An erivironmental
unpact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made
after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request.
This Deternunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued iinder WAC 197-11-340(2). The
lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments and/or
appeals must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. on June 5; 2015. The responsible official will reconsider
the DNS'based on timely commerits and may retain,modify, or,if significant adyerse iinpacts
aze likely, withdraw the DNS. If tlie DNS is retained, it will be fipal after the expiration of the
comment deadline.
Responsible Official: Mike Newman
Deputy Superintendent
Aubum School District No. 408
Telephone: (253) 931-4900
Address: Aubum School District
_ _
915 4�' Street NE
Auburn, WA 98002
Qnesfions may be directed arid comments may be submittedby 4:30 p.m;June 5,201!5,
to: Bob Kenworthy;Assistant Dii�ector, Capital Projects, Auburn 3chool DisfrictNo. 408, 915
4�'Street NE; Auburn, WA 98002.
Date of Issue: May 22, 2015
Date Published: May 22,2015- Auburn Reporter
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist.
Purpose of Checklist:
The $tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21G RCW, requires all
govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before
making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all
pcoposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency
identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if
it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic irifortnation about
your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether 4he
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant; requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with 4he most precise informa4ion known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each. question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do n.ot know" or
"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,
and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,
the govemmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of you� proposal, even if you plan. to do
them over a period of fime or on different parcels of land. Attach any acJditibnal
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be
significant.adverse impact.
Use of checklist.for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though ques4ions may be
answere.d "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject
actions (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the woriis "project,"
"applicant," and 'property or site" should be read as "proposal," '`proposer,`' and
"affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGBOUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
The adop6on oFthe Auburn School District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan("Capital
Facilities Plan") foi the piuposes of plaiining for the District's facilities naeds. King
County and the ciries of Auburn and Kent wi113ncorporate the District's Gapital Faeilities
Plan into each jurisdiction's respective Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona,
Pacific, and Black Diamond may incorporate the DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan into
each jurisdiction's respective Comprehensive Plans. A copy of the District's draft Capital
Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices.
2. Name of applicant:
Aubum School District No:408.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person;
Auburn School District No. 408
_
915 4�' Street NE
AuBurii,WA 98002
Contact Person:: Bob Kenworthy,Assistant Director, Capital Pro;jBcts
Telephone> (253) 931-4826
4. Date checklist prepared: May 18, 2015
5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408.
2
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
The Capital Faciliries Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the DistricYs Boazd of Directors
on or about June 8, 2015. Afrer adoption, the District will forwazd the Capital Facilities
Plan to the King County and the ciries of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and
Pacific for inclusion into each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will
continue to update the Capital Facilirias Plan on a regulaz basis. The projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related 40 or connected with 4his proposal? If yes, explain.
The Capital Facilities Plan identifies the capital unprovement projects that the District
plans to implement over the next six yeazs. The District plans to coristrdct two new
elementary schools and a new middle school. The District also plans to add portables at
existing schools. In addition, the District plans for technology upgrades at all facilities,
miscellaneous facility updates at multiple sites, and the completion of the modemization
of?,uburn High School.
8: List any ernironmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
The projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have undergone or will undergo
additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they aze developed.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental
approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If
yes, explain.
None lmown.
10. List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your
propo.sal, if known.
The District anticipates that King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent will adopt
the Capital Facilities Plan as part of each jprisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities
of Algona, Pacifiq and Black Diamond may inco;porate the DistricYs Capital Facilities
Plan into each jurisdicrion's respective Comprehensive Plans.
3
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed
uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you fo describe certain aspectsof your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those a_.nswers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include
additional specifc information on project description.)
This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School
District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's faeilities
needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into the Comprehensive
_
Plans of King County and the Ciry of Auburn. The cities of Algona,Pacific, arid Black
Diamond may incoiporate the District's Capital Faciliti8s Plan into each jurisdicrion's
respec6ve Comprehensive Plans. The projects included in tfie Capital FaciliriesPlan
have been or will be subject to project-level environmental;eview when appropriate. A
copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a Street address 'if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occurovera range
of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed planssubmitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The Capital Faciliries Plan will affect the Aubum School Distact. The District includes
an azea of approximately 62 square miles. Portions af unincorporated King Counry and
the cities of Algona, AntSurn, Black Diainond, Kent, and Pacific are servad tiy the
District. A detailed map of the DishicPs boundaries can be uiewed at the Dishiot's
offices.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly,steep slopes,
mountainous, other
The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and
gradients. Specific 2opographic characteristics ofl the sites at which the projects
_ _.
iricluded in the Capital Facilities Plan are located liave b:een oi will be identified
during p;oject-level environmental review when appropriate.
4
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (apprbximate percent slope)?
Specific slope chazacteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental
review.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the class�cation of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any prime farmland.
Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be identified during pioject-level environinental review when
appropriate.
d. Are there surtace indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
Unstable soils may e�cist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitarions
on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the rime of project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantitie.s of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be subject,
when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time
of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, qnanrity, and
source of any fill materials to be used have been orwill be identified at that;time:
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? I,f so,
generally describe.
It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently
proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the indi4idual projects
have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level
environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be
spbject to local approval processes.
5
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project constructibn (for example, asphalt or buildings?)
The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will
require the construcrion of impervious.surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover
coristructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This
issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to fhe
earth, if any:
The erosion potential of the projects inclnded in the Capital Facilities Plan and
appropriate control measures have be@n or will be addressed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reducrion and control
requirements have been or will be met.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial woo.d smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantitie§ if known.
Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each prbject have
been or will be evaluated dnring project-level environniental reyiew when app;opriate.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Acrions.
b: Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odo� that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projecu
included ip th_e Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-
level environmentat review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
Tfie indi4idnal projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be
subject to project-level envimnmental review and relevant local approval processes
when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all
6
applicable air regulations and air perinit reqniremerits. Proposed measures specific to
the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be
addressed during project-level environmerital review when appropriate. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
3. Water
a. Surtace:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of
the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There is a nerivork of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District.
The surface water bodies that aze iri ttie iriunediate dicinity of the projects
included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified duririg
project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the
surface water regiines and flow patterns have been ar will be reseazched and
incorporated into the designs ofthe individual projects,
2) Will the project require a,ny work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
plans.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the
surface waters located within the Aqbum School Disti-ict. Applicable 1oca1
approval requirements have been or will be satisfied.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surtace water or wetlands and indicate the area
of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
_ _. _
Inforniarion with respect to tHe placement or removal of fill and dredge material
as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or
will be provided durnig project-level envuonmental review when appropriate:
Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied.
7
4) Will 4he proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give ge,neral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the
projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed
during project=level environmental revi8w when appropriate.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note
location on the site plan.
Each project included in the Capital Facili6es Plan,.iflocated in a floodplain azea,
lias been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for floo.d azeas.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume
of discharge.
Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be
requued as a resnit of the projects incliided in the Capital Facilities Plan lias been
or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appiopriate.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Groundc
1) 1Nill groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
groundwatec? Give gerie�al desc�iption, purpose, and approzimate
quanti4ies if known.
Individual projects included in tlie Capital Facilities Plan may impact
groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed
dnring project-level environmental ceview wHen appropriate. Each project has
been or will be subject to applicable local regularions. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Acrions.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground
from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example' Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; efc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
numbe�of hou§es to be served (if applicable), or the number of animalsor
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
8
The dischazges of waste material that may take place in connection with the
projects included in the Pian have been or will be addressed during project-level
envuonmental review.
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Individual projects inclnded in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater
runoff consequences. Specifc information regarding tlie stormwater impacts of
each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental
review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be su6ject to applicable
local stormwater regulations.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of
waste inaterials into ground or surface waters: The specific impacts of each
project on gronnd and surface waters have be.en or will be identified during
project-level environmental review when appmpriate. Each project has been or
will be subject to all applicable regularions regazding the dischazge of waste
materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Suppleinental Sheet for
Nonproject Actions.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Pian haye been or will be addressed during project-
level environmental review when appropriate.
9
4, Plants:
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the sife:.
_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
_ grass
p.asture
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
_ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil; other
_ other types of Vegetation
A variety of uegetative zones aze located within the Aubum School District:
Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-le.vel
environmental review when appropriate.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed oraltered?
S.ome;of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require tlieremoval or
alterarion of vegetarion. 'fhe specific nnpacts on vegetation of the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project=level
enviioninental review when appropriate.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to b,e on or near'the si4e.
The specific impacts to these species from the individnal projects mcluded 9n tlie
Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be deternuned during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
d. P�oposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to p�esenie
or enhance yegetation on the site, if any:
Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the
Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified during pioject-leVel
envuonmental ;eview when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to
applicable local landscaping requirements.
10
5. Animals:
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: de.er, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
An inventory of species that have b:een observed on or neaz the sites of the projects
proposed in the Capital Faciliries Plan has been or will be developed during groject-
level environmental review when appropriate.
b. List any threatened o� endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or neaz the sites of the
projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during
project-level environmental review when appropriate.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migra6on routes
have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to preserve oranhance wildlife, if anyc
Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have be.en or will be deterriiined
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a. What kinds of ene�gy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it will
be used for heating, manufacturing, etc:
The State Boazd of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost aualysis of
all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school
projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries
Plan have been or will be deterriiined at the time of specific engineering and site
11
design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemerital Sheet for Nonproject
Acrions.
b. Would your project affect the poten4ial use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe:
The unpacts oF the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan on the solar
potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are inGuded in the plans of
4his proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce o.r control energy
impacts, if any:
Epergy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level
environxnental rediew when appropriate..
7. Envi�onmental Health:
a. Are 4here any environmental health hazards, including exposu�e to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, 4hat could
occuras a result of this proposaJ? Ifso, describe.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Noriprojeot Actions.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be �equired.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan complg or will comply with all
current codes, standazds, rules, and regulations. Individual projects tiave been or
will be subject to projeot-level environmental ;eview and local approval at the
time they are developed, when appropriate.
12
b. Noise:
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment; operation, other)?
A variety of noises from lraffic, construction, residenrial, commercial, and
indnstrial azeas eacists within the Auburn School Dishict. The specific noise
sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital FacIlities Plan have
been or will be idenrified du;uig project-level environmental review wheri
appropriate.
2) What types and levels of noise would be c.reated by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic;
construction, opera4ion, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
The projects included in the C.apital Facilities Plan may create normal
construction noises that wIll exist on a short-term basis only: The construotion
projects could increase h�affic azound the construcrion sites on a short-term basis.
Because the construction of additional capacity will iner8ase the capacity of the
District's faciliries; they may create a slight increase in traffic-related or
operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, any placement of
portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may
create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. IVeither of
these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the
$upplemental Sheet forNonproject Actions.
3) Propo.sed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
The projected noise impacts of the projeets included in the Capital Facilities Plan
have been or will be evalnated and mitigated during project-level envuonmental
review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable looal
regulations.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including
residential,commercial, industrial, uistitu6onal,utility, open space,recrearional, etc:
13
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been
used recently for agriculture.
c,: Describe any structures on the site.
The strnctiires located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be idenrified and described during project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
ii. Will any structures be demolished3 If so, what?
The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan, if ariy, have been or will be identified during pioject-level
envuorimental review when appropriate.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The sites that aze covered under the Capital Facilities Plan Have a variety of zoriing
classifications tiinder the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information
has been or will be identified during projectlevel environmental review when
appropriate.
f. What is the cur�ent comprehensive plan designation of Yhe site?
Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan Have been or will be completed during project-
_
level environmental review when appropriaje.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline rimaster program designation of
the site?
Shoreline master prograni designations of the sites of the projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified durnig project-level
environniental review when appiopriate.
14
, h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects uicluded in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level
environmental review.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
The Aubum School District currently serves appro�mately 15,126 students.
Enrollment is expected to increase to appro�mately 17,920 FTE students by the 2020-
2021 school yeaz. The District employs appro�cimately 1,650 people:
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan has been or will be edaluated during pro;iect-level environmental review when
appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of
the projects contained therein,will displace any people.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts; if any:
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject
to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate: Proposed
mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that tune, when necessary.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
The comparibility of the specific projects inclyded in the Capital Facilities Plan with
exis6ng uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive
planning p;ocess and during project-lavel endiroriiitental review when appropriate.
9. Housing:
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects
include.d in the Capital Facilitie§ Plan.
15
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
It is not anricipated that the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will
eliminate any housing units. The iriipacts of the projects included in the Capital
Faoilirie"s Plan op eacisting housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level
environmental revi8w when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts; if any:
Measures to reduce orcontrol any housing impacts caused by the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed duriug project-level
envii�oninental review wHen appropriate.
1A. Aes4hetics:
a. Wliat i§ the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The aesthetic nnpacts ofthe projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been
or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appmpriate:
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be al,tered or obstructed?
The aesttietic impacts ofthe p'rojects included in the C.apital Faciliti0s Plan have been
or will be addressed during project-level environxnental review when appropriate.
c. Propo.sed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts;if any:
Appropriate measiires to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects
included in tlie Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-
level basis when appropriate.
11. CigM and Glare:
a. VVhat.type of light or glare will the proposal produce? WhaY time. of day
would itmainly occur?
16
The liglit or glaze impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have
been or will be addressed during project-level environinental review, when
appropriate.
>
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have.
been or will be addressed during project-level environmental "re4iew when
appropriate.
c. What existing off-site soucces of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included m the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environniental
review when appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control lightand glare impacts, if any:
Proposed measures to mitigate light-and glare impacts have been or will be addressed
during project-level environniental review when appropriate.
12. Recreation:
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
There aze a variety of formal and informal recrearional facilities within the Auburn
School District.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
The recreational impacts of the proj8cts included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be address8d ducing project-level environmental review when
appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed
new school faciliries, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses.
c. Proposed measures to ceduee or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opporturiities tb be provided tiy the project or applicant, if any:
17
Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be subject to initigation dnring project-lev"el environmental review when
appropriate: School facilities usually provide ;ecreational facilitigs to the communi,ty
�n the form of play fields and gymnasiums.
13: Historic and Cultural Presenration:
a. Are there any places or objects listed on; or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
There aze no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, suchsegisters foi the
project sites nicluded in the Capital Facilities Plan. The eacistence of historic and
cultural resourcgs on ornext to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during
project-level environmental review when appropriate.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, atchaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
An inventory of lustorical sites at or neaz the sites of tlie piojects inclnded in the
Capifal Facilities Plan has b"een or will be developed during project-leyel
environmental review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Appropriate ineasuies will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate.
14. Transportation:
a. Ideritify public streets antl highways serving 4he site, and describe
proposed access to the e.xisting streetsystem. Show on site plans, if any;
The iinpact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the
Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nea�est transit stop?
18
The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan
and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-leyel environinental
review when appropriate.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been oc
will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(iridicate whether public or private).
The need for new streets or roads, oi improvements to existing streets and roads has
been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
e. Will the project use (or occur in 4he immediate vicinity ofl water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
Use of water, rail, or air transportation has beeri oY will be addressed during project=
level environmental review when appropriate.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generatecl by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The traffic impacts of the projects included in the C.apital Facilities Plan Have been or
will be addressed duxing project-level environmental review when appropriate.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if.any;
The mirigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
15. PublicServices:.
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire prbtection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
19
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public-senrices,
if any..
New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire.
alarms, smoke alarms, heat:sensors, and sprinklei systems.
16. Utilities:
a. Ci�cle utilities currently available at the site: elecf�icity, natural gas, wafer,.
refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewe.r, septic system, other.
Electricity, natdral gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sewer are or can be made
ayailable atthe kriown sites ofthe projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The
types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in
more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, tlie utility p�ovitling
the service, and 4he general construcfion activifies o.n the site or in 4he.
'rmmediate vicinity which might be needed.
Utility ievisioris and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-
level environmental review when appropriate:
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowiedge.
I understand that the:lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signafure: ���;4�Gt wTs(�(!s
Date Sufim" d: , 2015
20 �
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project ac#ions)
Because these ques4ions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment.
Whe.n answering these questions, be aware of the eident the proposal, or the
types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater
intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond tiriefly
and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;
emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or
production of noise?
To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, at
all three grade levels will be constructed or remodeled, some of these environmental
impacts will be more likely. Additional inapeiineable surfaces, such as roofs, access
roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter snrface or
ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment
that is installed purs.uant to the C.apital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the ptoduction,
storage, or release of toltic or hazazdous substances, with the possible exceprion of the
storage of diesel fu"el or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District
does not anticipate a signifcant increase in the prodnction of noise from its facilities,
although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the DistricPs
student capacities.
Proposed measures to avoid orreduce such increases are:
Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will
be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City
requirements and may be subject to Narional Eollutant Dischazge Eliminarion System
("NPDES") pemutting requirements. Dischazges to air will meet applicable air
pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and
state requirements.
21
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine
life?
The Capital FacIlities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the
environment. The piojects inclixded in the CapitalFacilities Plan may require clearing
plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat: These impacts have been or
will be addressed in more detail during project-level environxnental review when
appropriate. The projects included 'ui the Plan aie not likely fo generate significant
impacts on fish or marine life.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life
are:
Specific measures fo protect and c.oriserve plants, anurials, and fish cannot be
idenrified at tlus time. Specific mitigation proposals will be idenrified, however;
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
3, How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The constraction of the projects included in the CapiYal Facilities Plan will regui;e the
consumption of energy:
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are;
The projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will be conStructed in accordance
with applicable energy efficiency standards.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible orunder study) for governmental protection; such
as pa�ks, wilderries§, wilcJ and scenic rivers, th�eafened or endangered species habitat,
historic or cultural sites, weflands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects confained therein should have no
impac.t on these resources.
Proposed measures to prote.ct such resources or to ayoid or reduce imp.acts are:
Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate. Updates of tUis Plan will be coordinate:d
with King County and the cities of Algona, Auburn; Black Diamond, Kent, and
Pacific as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which
is to protect environmentally sensitive azeas. To the extent the Dishict's faciliries
planning process is part of the overall growtli manageriient plaririing process, these
resoiuoes are more likely to be protected.
22
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,
including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompati6le with
existing plans?
The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land oi shoreline use tliat is
incompatible with exisring comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline
inanagement plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or
the projects contained tliereui will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area
served by the District.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are'
No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities
Plan or the projects containe.d theiein are pioposed at tliis tiine.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation
or public services and utilities?
The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary
increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school
facilities will increase the Dishict's demands on transportation and urilities. T'hese
increases aze not expected to be significant.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
No measures to reduce or respond to such demands ace p"roposed at this time.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict wi4h local, state, or
federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requir8ments for the
protecrion of the environment.
23
POLICY & TEXT AMENDMENT (PT #2)
IfVCORPORATE DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT #343
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016-2021 �
i �� �;I11Up18.
l �����It�� •�:itl
l������' ��ln- �I
Die��n�e� ,�'chool .l�ist�ict
C'apatal 1�acilities .l�l�n
2016�2021
Board Approval Scheduled on
June I5, 2015
DIE.RINGER SCH�OL DISTRICT NO. 343
1320-178'h Avenue East
Lake Tapps,WasNington 98391
(253) 862-2537
BOAnn oFvrxECToles
Pete George
Andy Hart
Hilary McGabe
John McKenna
Monte St Johns
Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent
� e o
��l��lYl��r
Educating every child for
Confidence today and
Contribution tomorrow
Dieringer Schooi District No. 343 Dieringer School District
An Overview
Established in 1890,Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School
Dishict in ]936.The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School,Dieringer
_
Heights Elemeatary Sc}iool andNorth Tapps Middle 5ohool,p;oyide K throygh 8th
gi¢de ed'ucation, and serve as hubs for commupity activities as well:Dieringer School
District#343 is located in unincorporatedPierce County,bounded on the east by the
White River;on the west by the Stuck River,on the north tiy the city of Aubum, and on
the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner.The Dis�ict surrounds the northern
iwo-tliirds of Lake Tapps and covsrs approximately 5:5 squaze miles.
The curre�student enrollment is approximately 1,544 students in gradas kindergarten
through eight. Students in grades first thcotiigli tHird are housed at Lake Tapps
Elementary,constructed in 2005 as a replacement project Dieringer Heights Elementary
opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten,fourth ar�d fifth grade.
Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in T998 and2009,North Tapps Middle
School houses studenfs in grades sixth-eighth. 7'he district supports an additional 538
highs�liool students wHo may select to attend any public highschool.The majority chose
to attend Auburn.Riverside, 5umner and Bonney Lake High Schools.
The district has a long stan8ing history of proViding high quality education for al] our
stvdents. Opi goal is for ou;students to gain the skills that will allow them to become:
successfiil,confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed of
students who come to school well prepated and eagei to leam. Parents are concemed with
studeat:snccess;and provide outstanding suppo;t for their children and the Dieringer
5chool District: The PTA:and many volunteers conhibute countless hows and resources
to our schools and.studenu_ The comaiiinity supports the schools thruugh the passage of
fdnding issues to snpport bus acquisition,stude;rt access to cut;ent technology and the
constrvc6on of school facilities. Impact fees,including interest,are held in reserVe until
used to meet District identifiedaeeds for site acquisition, additional fac'ilities and
improvements and/or tecliuology capital expenditures.
DIERlNGER SGHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
.
Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2015
Current Facilities Inventory of Public. Schools
NAIvIE CAPACITY LOCATION.
_ _ _
Lake Tapps Elementary 440 1320-178`h Ave E., Lake Tapps
Dieringer Heights Elementary 533 21727—3�F'h St.E.,Lake Tapps
North Tapps Middle School 536 20029- 12�'St,E., Lake Tapps
High 3chool 0
TOTAL 1,509
� � i' @ 5�: :a. 'a p. c .g e � � :� e .� p. '
� j � ���' t�ty j:p.�. '` � A� U BLU�.R N� I �y,�Yt�FB�•�� '� '�.. �I
o ' — ' .
.:Jj n I' � ' t�' � ��i i: .
6 �:'• �SL�--,�i+ � • . � .�. .� 'i
E 'i� @ f; �
.i��,_
� �3l, � '( � � • �4 � •�tt I, � + la. � •�,� . M�` �� � �� I
�' L .+ � �. ��
� ��S.i �� ?�.8 �� �� .•�: . � {- - � '. u^.: . ::�._' "' " '�z' " ' • : ] '." �'�
+ri � 9 ' � �
' �i 5 ..r t+ •.F �I ; 4. . � . +ww.�'"'�"'a.i : . M1fUGHLES�00T "y �� WOlAN ;
� �� ' i � �Ta.'i.v ` ',t er � �. �
� II
: Y �� �udm • 1 � • b�� � � ��Wf�le ' � � �l
��, � It i . . I. .
� � 2.�.� � C4f � � P•� i . � G � 4ab i . i .. .
w 1_' nw;_,_�._ 11
n � :Q .� ti" .i-.. ./�'s" , -'�'-i�' n vi tM�.�1''� �-� '- ` � 'i '3
1 �::_� /�. . 4_i. ri c 1l:•• .
!k' 6�
r.% r y I
� }..r't. Y� .
� :�.i.:�. 5:.v:
' '^ O
m i ,W . 1. . . � n...r� y' ,��'r h rj+"c[�`�y�.. , '. r 1 � E _
� .'��s_s. . i t , t�siyj,F" E 1' G ' C,Itwx HES RV�jH7�Y m
� ` � � -'= � "' ' . �� ie��, �y�fl�iy� �. r.�.iwwa � „ �,
�1 1 .4i I _'7- • r _' ' i � ',u _ . �q�0.j, Yt�' _ "..�j-- . • _ . la_, n o�
f ^+�°`�,, '��� 4�"r"atsr �� tk�-�,k �#� � i � '.
�'- r�a r�� � �+z �q .µ
II J, _ W /�. :S � L-�d4A�� . . Y' , T 7 � � I: L
I � ��. ' I �.• � ��� .. r}1 ry ' ' . SM� . � � li
. � � ' ��� � I' ��l ��1.1 L��"Y � yy . . ' _� 1..
a � /t �, J � *'s+tt 7� �°� Y�l:fi" I . ]ry��`�d -�'.+ ..�..^ n '
'1 � �. �j i �..�Y � r T�t4 � -rv !'c � 9{�,aFr . '1 . 1 .. . . �� "
�.' � � !j .�`� , ' ��flR,�� n xty�f,i . 4 ` f GiGu����t � d:�� �i; '.�__"7rs__ � � .
n : . A. i t L ,,,, y , i �:� �E w+,A�aRSi @$g ' � _ F s+�As . Ttpi 1 � I I
S U M N 'R�i � , . ; ,..=A - �-�g� t q�:, '� i4�w;e � � . - •la• ---= y
�a 79� -• 1 � �y ^ 18� � . • .. � ' �},'� i . /a wo ; e. . ; I
I � �. ��,F)�;- § . r
�� �� , � . �� ' � i ��.: � � ti v"o�1''�. � �:.%, � '� , i; .� ��
_ - �. . . � i .LFy��h � �, n� ��-�} xu�.` � '.b '�.
OIERIN6ER SCHOOL 019TRICT ND.349 I i ' `i � .�. . \ .'k't iri ��.�'+a. a � f ���ilSa r��T' .� � .. --- ��
n ' OISTRICT�9GlINbAFiY,MAP � I ` ' ` ^ r�y�'y� � :� �� /�� ��'r 3 _—��4b��'��
w..oedm„ i.�,,.mo.�.�wd ► \ f49 s�� N�' � � 4s'"`� 3 `�'. �, : • ;i' ; > � '�'..
�mnaa..c omwww.a +(p �� :c+r� ^p'SIl;- i � ��
� . .
� �y � a+.ie.w�w� �i4i+wxemm� ! � i w' ' Y' }� v ;1 ♦ ��b f J F�' I
m�lw.ml p�ma� � �
o.�.�.�,a. ,�„A�.�., y,� �; u i , � ,
, ,
� nmamre� mv�mwe i.. ` I h I ,� .J ; ������;���� ,����".' "'v i �d.""�_t p
� .mn....a. ..w.nw.w C� � ._..... _. -2 +• - - � 81- F
I 1� � pqm�m �mlwam ^ 9 1 � �:J Y . ° �, '}��.,,��d�i . � i: !I
wlvlo�xemue� I�: i . . �wu I '''. ,�� •� �` r �� � #r���� � i i �� ie
�, oa • mv�.owr�Wdr•r.s .,��- � � i` I -� �J �S. _. 'i . r .
'. �� l . ''�'�'F4, °� �I
'L _'�__ -'+-_� e�
s y e. ,s s'. E .'e ��6 � P 3�. _ a: "a - u� - 3' d 'a a�� 'd n
\
Dieringer School District Proposed Hoasing
Potential Enrollment Increase
June 2015
Proposed Housing Units:
Single Family- 186 x .452 generation fabtor=84 students K-S
Enrollment Impact:
84 students K-8
Estimated 17 students a yeaz oyer the period 2016-2021
Poteatial enrolIment increase= .5%(based on 1,544 enrollment 5/15)
Increase per grade level= 8.4 students (based on 10 grade bands)
Approximately students per school:LTES 147;NTMS 147;DHES 196
District enrollment based on 5/15 and potential growth=1,628 students
District.program capacity*= 1,509 students
*current program capacity based on full- and half-time kindergarten
Enrollment Projections
The Dieringer School Dis�ict is located in an azea that continues to experience growth.
This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicatbrs: enrollment trend data,
proposed housing development, and the mitigatio.n impact fees ;eceived for new
construction.
The District continues to experience steady growth in student entollmeat This has
sliglifly ezceeded tlie Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational S,ervice Dis�ict
(PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period; A review of proposed conshvction
wi#hin the borders of the Dieringer School Dishict indicates that the growth trend can be
expected to continue oVer the next fodr years and beyond.Ttns growth trend was slowed
in recent years by economic conditions, but has started to pick up again. There.are 185
single family residents slated for consiruction within the next five yeazs. These projects,
together with individual lots and general in-migration, aze anticipated to generate an
additional 84 students in kindergarten tlirough eighth grade.
Information &om Pierce county Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space
and zoning for approximately 1,200 additional housing lots in the.western portion of the
district. This creates a potential for 542 additional students, kindeigarten tliiough eigh#h
gade that are not included in the above numbers.
To partially address tlus growth, the Dis�ict passed a 2006 boad issue to constract an
additional five classrooins at Dieringer Heights Elementary.. Those classrooms were
compieted and occupied in 20Q9. The bond issue also provided for the addition of an
auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North Tapps
1Vliddle School. Those projeots ware complated in 2009 and tlie new iristructional spaces
aze in use. Futtite anticipated growth wi11 create the need to acyuire an additional school
site and cons�pct an addirional.schoo]to house the growing student enrollment.
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
Spring 2015
#1 Fuirweather Coye Esfates (19)Pierce Co
-Notice of application 1/24/Ol
-26 5ingle Family Lots (26 homes will be built on2.87ots)
- 1600-2Q00 block of 16`b St. @ the 17500-I'7800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy.
-7 houses completed;
#2 Rainier Plateau(10) Pierce Co
-Notice of application 10/13l00
- 10 Single Family Lots
-End of 34�' St.
- Site work completed,• 6ome constrnction TBD
#3 Grandview Ridge II and III (9)Pierce Co
- Off Sumner-Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr.
-Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13/99
-49 Single Family Lots; completed
-III (91ots)no date(no change)
#6 Tapps lVIeadow (Van Der Hoek) (11)Pierce Co
-Notice of application 9%13/04
-11 large lots
-Across from Snag Island
-Site work complete (no chunge)
#7 Country Creek Estates (9) Pierce Co
-10 Single FamilyLots-off 15`h neaz Edwazds Road
-One(1) house completed
#8 Forest Canyon Estates (121) Pieree Co
-121 Single Family Lots—off Forest Canyon Rd.
-Permit expired
#11 Carter Estates (16)Auburn
-I6 Single Fanuly Lots—Lake Tapps Pazkway and 179`h
-161iomes (uo construction scheduled)
186 Single Family Units to be built
Standard of Service
The Dieringer School Dishict houses children in elementary schools serving students
Idndergarten through fifth grade and"a middle school that houses grades siz througii
eighth. High scliool students, grades nine through twelve, attend adjacent lugh schools,
primarily in the Aubum and Sumner School Districts.
Dieringer Sohool District follows a traditional schoo] calendaz beginning in eazly
September and oompl.eting in mid June. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49
and 8:45 a,m. and end between2:I7 and 3>15 p.m.
The Dieriager School Distriet standar3 of service is basad on class size aud pingram
decisioas adopted by the Dieringer 5chool Dis�ict Board of D'uectors,. Based on the
district philosophy regarding cIass size,the tazgetednumber of students per classroom
kindergarten is 19, first through third grade is 22, fourth thraugh fifth grade 27 and sixth
through eighth grade 38. These class sizes have an impact on f¢cilities and the permanent
capacity of each school reflects these class:sizes.
In the District,rooms designated and assigned for special use aze not counted as capacity
clessrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instru_ction,physical
edpcarion and art instruction in separate,non-capaciry classrooms: Computer labs aze
provided at each school as non-capacity spaces. Special education and remedia] �
progiams are provided as pullout prograrns;and do not proVide capaciTy. At the middle
school level, instruction is organized azound.a six period day; classroqms are calculated
as_p;oviding 5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instractional
space.
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2015
Dieringer School DistricYService S;audards
Pnblic School Facilities
(Square Feet Per Student)
Elementary School 120
Middle School 189
7unior High NA
High Schoo] NA
Dierin�er School District Individual Caoaciri Proiects (2016-2021)
Elementary School No. 3 400
High Schoo] NA
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
_
PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS
MASTER SCHEDULE
June,2075
Name Curtent 6-Year Total
Ca ac Ca ac Ca aci 2Difi 2017 2018 2D79 2020 2021
Lake Tapps Elementary 440 440
(LTES Replacement)
Dieringer Heights Elem. 533 533
Elementary Schooi.No. 3 400 400
North Tapps MS Incl 536 536
N"I MS Add'itions 2U09
TOTALS 1509 400 1909
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Capital Facilities Plan Update, June 2015
CFP Projects and Financing Plan
Sources and Uses of Funds
(x $1,000)
Sonrces of Funds
Existing Revenue:
Reserve $777
New Revenue:
Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching
Fun.d.s, Dedications, Mitigation Payments 22 018
TOTAL SOURCES $22,795
Uses of Funds
Element.ary School No. 3 ($21,375)
Non-Capacity Projects:
School Site , Technology Upgrades, 1420
And Board Approved Projects
TOTAL USES $22 745
BALANCE 0
DIER.INGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
FWANCEPLAN 2016-2021
June,2�15
Permanent Capaciry Projeots Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source ofFunds.
Estimated Es4imated Amt Estimated Impact Leyy, Band 8 State Impact
Cast Lew. Bond State Match Fees nteres Match Fees
Elementary School No:3 21;375,DD0 21,375,000 0 0 0 D 0
Total Capacity Projects 29,375,000 21,375,000 0 0 0_ _ ._ _ __0__ _ _._D.
Non-Capacfiy Projeots
School Site Elem. No. 3 150,000 0 0 89,000 0 0 81,000
Technology Improvements '1,180,000 195,00� 0 0 736,500 0 248,500
Board Approved Projects 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 90,0'
Total Non-Capecity Projects 3,-420,000 195,OD0 D 89,000 -736,500 0 399,500
TOTAL PROJECTS 22;Z95,000 _ . _21,570,000_ _ __0_ _ 89,000 736,506__ __ _0_ _ _399,500.
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2015
Capital Facilities.Require,ments to 2021
Time Period Stiident Student Net Reserve Total Cost
Popularion Capacity Or(Deficiency) (Cost/Sludent
X
Net Deficiency)
2015 Actual 1544 ISD9 (35) (988,750)
2016-2021 Growth 86 400 3S2
Dieringer School District Gost Per Student
(2015 Dollevs)
Elemenfary Middle Junior High High
Schools Schools Schools Schools
$22,500 $34,040 NA NA
School Im act Fee Calculation 6/75 DISTRICT ;DTei[ttggi;:$41�cal:�isiriet;;;
Sehool.StteAc uisition.CosC
Acre9iCo3f erAcre %Facility:Gapaci xStudent Generotion Foctor
Student Student
Fdcili Cost7 Facili Factor _ Fodor Cost/ Gost/
Acreoge Acre . _ Cdpacify SFR MFR SFft. _ MFR
Elementa ��i�>��:1;10:::� i�i .SW;qQQ:i>`i<:;iii:4t30:�:<;::;c?2;Oc32'L:::?c;i�i;�iU>1��2 4:824 2580
...+�........ .. ..........:.:..:. .,....................... _. _
Middls ;:;;`:b:1�.L7t;:::;;;:;:0:675#
. ...... ....... .._. :::•.
;� ::�: .:.:..: :::::.:::
.•:.:
- TO7AL $4.624 ---- --$2.580
_ ___ . -- _ - - --
Sehoal ConsUucflon CosL•
Focili Cost/Focili Ca aci xStudent Generation Pactot x permanent/Tot613qFt)
Student Studerit
_..,,,., c:;;Facilitjti;;i:;Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
;;.�:::::::.:•::.
Gost 6a acity SFR_ . MFR SFR__ MFR
Elemeniary No.3 $21;375;000 d00 0:322 0:172 $1Z:ZOZ $9,191.
...................:..:•:::::::
0:130 - 0.070
- .;�;;;;>•..�:.:..:::.:�.,.:...,,..
707AL $17,207 $9,191
Tem orary�FaeTty Costc
Focili Cost/Facili Ca ocity)x5tudent Gener6tion Factor x Tem ora /Totol Squa2 Feet . . _
Siudenf Studenl CosiJ Cost/
%Tem / Focili Faciii Factor Facto� SFR MFR
____ _ Total Sq.P Cost Size SPR MFR
_-
Elementory ::;::;::�g:;:::;:;<::::;b: 0.322 O.T72
Ivtiddle ::;::::$.0',:;;::;;:;;:;;:;;:0: OJ30 O.fl70
. ._ .... ....... TOTAL - --- - -�0, - - __.�_
State.Matching Cradit
Boeckh IndexX 5P1:5 ume Foota X D'atrict Motch 96 X SiudentFdctor
_ . __ _ _ _ _ Student Student
Boeckh SBI District Factor. _ . Factor Cast/ Cost/
Index, Foofage fylalcfi % SER MFR SFR. MFR _ .
_ ___ -- _—
Elementary ........ ........ - - -
:::.:..........:�::�:::•:�::•:::::::::........:,
Middle
TOTAL $0 $0
Tax Pa menfCredit: � SFR � MFR
-
:.:•::::: ..........:::.:...........
Average Assessed Value 2014 :,;.;;;;:;:$39Ej;517.:<;,;;:;$�74;$BQ::
Ca ital Bond InteFest Rate esi 6p 4 �:.3,JS�a •> �7:5%
Net Present Value of Avera e Dwelling $3 373 555 � $2,322769
_ :..•:;:.;:::_:
:�::E4:�::::::::::%::::;�;::1:0
:•r::•:•::;:.: .... .. . . .
Properfy Tax LevyRate 3013 _ _ `:�::�>:�>::$3;744$::;i:�i�i�$��� 46�:
Present Volue of Reveiiue Sfream $12687 $8,735
___ _ _
Fee,Suma . Single Multi le
F rt� FamE
Site Ac uistion Cosis $4;8Z4.00 $2580.00
Perrnaneni Focili Co§t $17;206.88 9.191.25
Tem ora Facili Cost $0.00 $0:00 - -
StateMatchGredff O.OD 0.00
T6x Pa mentGredit 12,686.59 $8,735:01
_ _ fEE $9.344 $3.036
- --
FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF50%
__ $$.672
FEE WITH DISCOUNi OF 50% � 51,518 .
�+� � pp �} i
�I I�, �� F A ��$k� � �?�,Y�.�,��..-�' I
- _ . IERINGER S�CHOOL DISTRICT �Eaj;� �? �, ��.;� �
Educating every child for � I
� Confidence today and r�iv �i- r , .,
C o t��t r�ab,u t i o!r�-f o�m o�r��A�W
June 1, 2015
Kevin Snyder '
Director of Planning
City of Aubum
25 West Ivlain Street ;
Aubum, WA 48001-4998 �
Subject: Dieringer School District-Mitigation Impact Fees II
Deaz Mr.Snyder.
i
The Dieripger School District has completed the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2016-
2021. In preparing the updated Capital Facilities Plan the District once cnore reviewed the question of the !
�
School Impact Fee CalculaUon. Based on the analysis of the DistricYs site acguisition and permanent facility i
costs;the Dieringer School District Boazd of Directors has determined that the appropriate mitigation impact fee
for the permitting ofa single family residence is $4,672 and$1,518 per unit for a mnitipie familyresidence. i
�
A review of the fees wllected by the City of Aubum, on behalf of other school districts within the city, serves �
fo support the validiry of the Dieringer requested fee of 4,672 and $1,518 per unit foi a multiple family �
residence.
The property values within the boundaries oflhe Dieringer School District aze the_highest in Pierce County;this ;
cause,s site acquisition to be expensive and contributes to overall higher construction costs than othe;school I
districts experience. Therefore,it is most apprapriate for the mitigation impact fees collected on behalfaf the '
Dieringer School District to be adjusted to more closely approximate the fees collected for other local school �
districts. �
�
�
The Dieringer School Disirict requests that the City of Auburn.adjust the mitigation impact fees collected on i
behalf of the District to the 4,672 and $1,518 per unit for a multiple family residence established in the Capital
FaciliUesPlan foi 2016-2021. Please let me kn'ow if you need funher information by contacting'me at(253) i
862-2537. �
Siricerely, ��� �
i,
i
dy wn 'er-Martinson !
Superintendent i
i
]320-178'^Avenue Easl"Lakc Tapps,Washington 98791'(253)8b2-2537"FAX(253)-662-8472 (
Dieringer Schoof Distric(N343 is an Equal Opparlunity Insfilulion
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
for
Dieringer School District No. 343
2015 Capital Facilities Plan
Issued with a 14day comment and appeal period
Desqription of Proposal;
This threshold determinatian analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the folfowing
actions,which are so closely relate.d to each other that they are in effect a single action:
1. The adoption of the Dieringer School District 2015 Six-Ysar Capital Facilities Plan by the
Die�inger School District for the purposesofplanning fb�the facilities needs of the District
2. The amendment of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to include the Dieringer School
Distric#2015 Capitai Facili4ies Pl,sn as a part of the Capital Facilities Pian Element of the Pierce
Caurrty Comprehensive Plan,
3. Tfie amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Aubum to inolude the Dieringe�Schobl
DistricYs 2015 Capita[Facilities Plan as part of the Capftal Facilities Plan Element of the
Comprehensive Plans of the City of Aubum.
4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sumner to include the Dieringer _
School DistricYs 2015 Capital Faoilifies Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of ths
Comprehensive Plans of the City ofiSumner.
Proponent: Dieringer School District No,.343
Location of the Proposal:
The Dieringer Schooi Distriat'includes an area of approximately 5.5 sGuare mdes,.Portions of the
ci6es of Aubum and Sumner fall within the DistricYs boundaries,.as do parts of unincorporated
Pierce Gounty.
Lead Agency:
Dieringet Schoof DistrigtNo.349 is fhe lead agency pursuant to WAC 19711-92.6,
The lead agency far this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a
proba6le signifipant adve[se:impact to the environment An environmental`impact Statement(EIS) is
not required under RCW 43:21 C.�30(2) (c).This decision was made after a review of the
comPleted:environmental checkl'ist and otiter in.formation on file w'ith 4he lead agency.This
information is available to the public upon request
_.
This Determinatian of Nonsignificance(DNS) is issuedunder WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead
agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of:issue. Gomments must be submitted
__ _ _ _
by 4:00;p.m., June 15,2015.The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on time[y
comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw tbe DNS. If
ttre DNS is retained, ft will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline.
Responsible Offciai.:. � . �{i��
Dt Judy mei rtinson /��
Superin dent
Dieringe-School District No. 343
Telephone: {253) 862-2537
Address> 1320 178'^Ave E:
Lake 1'apps,llVashington 88391
Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No. 6890 which can be obtained from
_._
br.Judy Neumeier-Nlartinson, Superintendent, Dieringer School D�strict No. 343, 1320 178'^Ave E.,
Lake Tapps, lNashingtori 98391 and pursuant to 1NAC 680 and RCVN 43.21 C.075.
Date oflssue: June1, 2D15
�ate Published June 1, 2015
ENVIR�NMENTAL CHECKLIST
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist
Purpose of Checklist
The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), chapter 43:21 G RGW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the en0i�onmental impacts ofaproposa� tiefore making
decisions.An environmental impact statement(EIS)mustbe prepared forali proposals with
proba.ble s.ignificant adyerse impacts on the quality of ttie environment.The purpose of this efiecklist
is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be do.ne) and to help the agency decide whether
an EIS is required.
Instructions forApplicants:
This environmental checklfst asks you to describe some basic informadon about your
proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checkiist to determine whether the envirpnmental impacts
of your proposal aie signfioant, requiring preparation of an EIS.Answer the questions bdefly,wiih
the most precise infortnation known, or give the best descripfion you can.
You must answet each question accurately and carefulty,to the best of your knowledge. In
most cases, you should be able t�answer ttie quesUons from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or ff a question does not apply
to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not appiy."Complete answers to the questions now
may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask ahout goVemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations.Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the govemmental
agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of 4ime or on different parcels of land.Attach any additional information that wiil help descrihe
your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which you submit this checkEist,mayask
you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonabfy related to determining if
there may be significant adverse impact
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered
"does rtot appiy.° In addition, complete the Supplementai Sheet for nonproject actions(part D):
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words"project;""appiicant,°and
"property or site°should be read as"proposal,°"prepares,"and"affe.cted geographic area,"
respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable
The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Ptan tiy the Dieringe�School District The
Comprehensive Plans of Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of8umner have
_
been andlor wfli be smended tn include the Dieringer School District 2D15 Capitai
Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Pian Element of each jurisdiction's
Comprehensive Plan.A copy of the DistricCs Pian is available for review in the
District Office.
2. Name of applicanta
Dieringer School District No. 343
3. Address-and phone numtier of applicant and contaet person`.
Dieringer Schaol District No. 343
1320 178'"Ave E.
Lake Tapps,WA 98391
Contact Person: D�.Judy Neurtieier-Marttnson, Superintendent
Telephone:(253) 862-2537
4. Date checklist prepared:June 1,2015.
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Dieringer School District No. 343
6: Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, ff applicable):
The 2015 Dieringer School District Capital Faciiities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in
June, 20'I5 and fonvarded to Pierce Counry, Cities of Aubum and Sumner for possible
_ _ _
inclusion in each jurfsdiction'sComprehensiye Plan; The Capi#al Facilities Plan will be
updated annually. Site-specifie proJects have been or will be subject ta project-specific
environmental review.
7. Do you haye any plans for future,additions, expansion,or further acfivity rel_ated to or
connected with this proposal?If yes,explain.
The Capital Facilities Pian reviews the purchase of additional properiy and the construc6on
of a new elementary school.
8. List any environmental iriformation you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared,directly related to tFiis proposal.
The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal
proposai.
9. Do you know wHether applications are pending forgovemmental approvals of other
proposalsdirecUy aftecting the property covered by your proposal7
If yes, explain:
No.
10. List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
Pierce County anti Cities of Aubum and Sumner will re4iew and approve the Capital
Facilities Plan forthe purposes of impact#ee ordinances and will need to adoptthe Plan as
an amendment to 4he Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of Pierce
County and Cities of Aubum and Sumnec
11. Give a brief, complete description of your praposal, including the proposed usesand
the size of the project and site.T,here are several questions later in this checklist that asKyou
to describe certain aspects af yourproposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on
this page.(Lead agencies may modify this form to include additlonal specific informafion on
project description.)
This is a non-project action. This proposal invoEves fhe adoption of the Dieringer Schooi
Qistrict 2015 Capital Faclities Plan for the purpose of planning the faciUUes needs of the
District and#or inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan etement and possi6le amendment of
the Comprehensive Plansfor Fierc.e Gounty, City ofAutiurn and City of8umner. A copy of
the Capital Fa6ilities Plan rrmay be viewed at the.Dieringer School District Office.
12.. Location of the proposal. Give sufficienFinformation for a person to understand 4he
precise location of yourproposed project, including a street address if any, and sectlon,
townsfiip,and range, if known. If a praposal would occur over a range of area,grovide the
range arbaundaries of the site(s). Provide a fegal description, site plan,vicinity map, and
topographic map,if reasonably available:While you should sutimit any plans required by the
agencg, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist.
The 2015 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Dieringer School Disfict The bistricYincludes
_ .. _ .
an area of approximately 5.5 square miles., Portions of the City of Aubum and the Ctty of
Sumner, and parts of unincb�po[ated Pie�ce County,fail within the Districrs boundaries.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site(circle one): Fiat,ralling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, and more than 2!3 of Lake Tapps.
The Dieringer School DisVict is comprised of avariety oftopographic land forms and
gradierits, including a0 of those listed. Specfic topographic characteristics will
identified.during the planning and permit process foreach capitai prajsct
b. Whaf is the steepest siope on the site(approximate percent siope)?
Specific slope charecteristics will be identified during the planning and permit
processfor each capital project.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site:(for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you khow the c4assification ofagricultural soils, specify them and note
any prime farmland.
Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit process foreach
capital project
_
d. Ars there surface indications,or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
_ _.
If so, describe.
Unstable soils may exist within the Dieringer Sqhool,District: Specific soil limitations
on indi4idual projectsites willbe identified at the time of environmental re4iew.
e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of'any filCng or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Individual projects inciuded in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project
specific environmental review and local approval at the time ofproposal:Proposed
grading projects, a5 well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials
wiA be identified as appropriate to each project
f. Could erosion occu�as a result of ctearing,construetion, oc use? If so,generally
describe.
It is possible thaterosion could occur as a result af construction projects¢urrently
proposed in 4he Gapitai Facilfties Plan. Individual projecfs and theirerosion impacts
will be evaluated on a site-specific basis.]ndividualprajects will be subject+to
environmentaf reyiew and local approval at the fime ofproposai.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious project
construcfion (for example, asphalt or buldings?)
Percentage of irtipervious cover ivith vary with each capital facilities proJeot andv�iill
be addressed during project specific environmental review.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to tFie earth, if
any:
Erosion potential on individual projectsites will be addressed duringproject=specific
enVironmental re4iew: Relevant ero"sion reduction and control requirements will be
met.
2. Air
a. What lypes of emissions to the air wouid result from the propesal(ie., du5t,
automobile, odors, industrial waod smoke) during construction and when tfie project
_
is compieted? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Various emissions, manyconstruc6on-related;may result from indiyidual projects.
Air-quality impacts will be evaluate.d.during project-specific environmental review..
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Are,there any off site sourcesof emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally desoribe.
Off-site sources and necessary mitigatiqn w'i_II be addressed du.ring project-specific
environmental reView.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any
Ptans for individual projects included in the Capitai faciliBes Pian have been or will
be subject to enVironmental review and relevant local approval processes, including
obtaining of any necessary air quality permifs, at the time individual piojects are
formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
3. Water
a: .Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in 4he immediate vicinity of the
site(including year-round and seasonal streams,Jakes, ponds,wetlands)? If
yes,describe type and provids names. If appropriate, state what sVeam or
rrver it flows info.
Tfiere is a netwoiic of surface water bodies within the DieringerSchool
DisVict. The surface water regimes.and flow pattems have b;een o�will be
researched and incorporated'in the design of eadh individual project.
2) Will theproject require:any work oyer, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet)the descritied waters? If yes,please descri6e and attach available
plans.
Some projects mayrequire wark near fhese described waters. Individual
prqjects in the Capital Facitities Plan wili 6e subject to environmental review
and local approval requirements at the time the project is formallyproposed.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge.material that be placed in ar
removed from surface water or wetlands and tndicate the area of the site that
would be affected: Indicate the source of fill material.
Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material
wiil be addressed at the time of project-specific environmenta{reyiew.
Applicabfe local regulations haye been orwill be safisfied.
4) Wiil the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Givegeneral description, purpose, and approximate-quantities if.known.
Any surface water wi4hdrawals or diyersions have lieen or will be addressed
during project-specific enVironmental [e4iew.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note tocation
on the site plan:
Each capital facilitiesproject, if looated'fn a flaodplain area, will be requ€red to
meet applicable local regula6ons for flood areas.
6) Does the proposaf involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If.so, describe the type o.f waste and anticipated volume of
clisgharge.
Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, 'rf any, will be
addressed during project-specific en�ironmenfal review: Please see the
Supplemental Sheef for Nonproject Actions.
b. Ground:
i) Will ground waterbe with_drawn, orwiil water be discharged fo ground
water? Give gene[al description, purpose, and-approxiisiate,q'uanUties if
known.
Indi4idual p�ojects included in the Capital FaciliUes Plan.may impact ground
water resources:Each project wiil 6e evaluated during project-specifc
environmental review.Applicable Iocal regulations haye,b:een or will be
satisfied. Please°see tfie Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
2) Describe waste materiai that will be discliarged into the g�ound from
septic tanksor other sources, if any(for exampte: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing fhe following chemicals. .;agricultural; etc.). Descritie
the generalsize of the system, the number ofsuch systems,the number of
ho.uses to served(if applicable), or the:number:of animals or tiumans the
system(s) are expected to serve.
Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed
during site-specific; project-level.ernrironmental rev'tew.
c. Water Runoff{including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including stortn lwate� and method of
crollection and disposal, 'rfany(include quantities, if known).Wheie will this
water flow?Will fhis water flow into other waters? ffso, describe.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian may have varying
storm water runoff consequenoes. Each project will be subject to
environmental review and applicable locel regulafrons.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters?If s.o,
generaily describe.
Individual projects included in tlie'CapitaJ Facilities Plan will haye varying
envitonmentai'impacts and will be subject to appropriate re4iew and local
regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will
be presented at the time of such review.Please see the Supplemental Sheet
for Nonproject Actions.
d. Proposed measu2s to reduce or coMroi surface, ground, and runoff water �
impacts, if any:
Specific measures to red"uce or control runoff impacts haye 6een ar wiq be developed
on a project-specfic basis in cooperetion with the appropriate jurisdiction.
4. Plants:
a. Check or circle types nf vegetation found on the site:
_ deciduoustree: aider, maple, aspen, other
_ evergreen tree:fr, cedar, pine, other
_ shrubs
_ grass
_ pasture
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants'. cattail, buttercup, 6ulrush, skunk cabbage. Other
_ other water plants;water tily, eelgrass, milfoii, other
_ o4her types of vegetation
There are various vegetative zones within the Dieringer School District.An inventory
of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental
review.
b. What kind and emount of vegelaEion will be removed or altered?
Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of project-spec�c environmentai
review at the time the;pro}ect is fiormally proposed. Please see the 5upplemental
Sheet for Nonproject Acfions.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Specific impacts to these spec.ies from individual projects Has been orbe determined-
at the time of project pinposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project level
environmental review:
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plarrts, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the ske, ff arry:
Individual projects included in#hs Capital Facilitles Plan v✓ill tie subject to
enyironmental review and local app�o�al at the time of project proposal.
5. Animals:
a, Clrcle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the sfte or
are known to tie on or near the site:
birds: fiawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other.
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver,other.
fish: bass,:salman,trout, perch, crappies,tiger muskies other..
An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or w'ill.b:e deVeloped
during project specific environmental review.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Specific fmpacts to these species from individual projects�nn'll be deterrnined at fhe
time of project proposal and will be reviewed in.cooperation wifh tlie affected
jurisctictions.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.
Impac#s on migration routes, if any,will addressed during sfte-specific, project-level
environmental reView.
d. Praposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife;i f any.
Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance virildfife have been oi wili be
deterrmiined at tfie time of site-spec�c, project-level enVironmentaJ review.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a. What kinds of energy (electric, naturalgas, ol,wood stove, sota�will be
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used far
heating, manufacturing, etc.
The State BoartJ offducation requires a Iife-cycle cost analysis of all heating,
lighting, and insulating systems priorto allowing specificprojectsto proceed. Energy
needs will be decided at the time of spec�c engineering and site design planning.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Wou]d yout praject affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
prbperties? If so, genera}ly desari6e:
Individual projects af this Gapital Facilities Rlan will be evaluated a.s to their impact
on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental[eview:
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in 4he plans of 4his
proposal? List other proposed measures#o reduce o�control energy impacts, if any:
Energy consenration measureswill be considered at the project-specfic design
phase and environmental reyiew.
7. Envirbnmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a
result of this proposal? If so, describe.
Please see the Supplerriental Sheet forNonproject Actions.
1) Describe special emergency services that mfght required.
Please see 4he Suppiemental Sheet for Nonproject Acfions.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control snvironmental heaRh
hazards, if any:
Proposed projects will compiy with all curcent codes, standards, and niles
_. ,. . . .. - _ -
and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subje.ct to
enyironmental review and local approdal at the time of formal sutimittaL
b. Noise:
1) What types ofnoise exist in the area which may affect your project
{for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
A variety of noises exist within the Dieringer School District. Spec"ific noise
sources haye been or will 6e iden�ed during project-specific environmerital
re4iew.
2j What types and leyels of noise would b"e created by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic;
construction, operation, ather)? Indicate what hours noise would come from
the site.
Nortnal construction noises would exist on a short term basis during school
construction.There.cduld be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise
which wouldbe addressed during qroject specific environmentai review:
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonpfoject Actions.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or cor[trol noise impacts, if any:
Project noise impacts have been or wi11 be evaluated and mitigated during
th:e project specific environmental reyisw,Each project is or will be subject#o
applicable local regulations.
8. Lanci and Slioreline Use:
a. What isthe cuRentuse of the site and adJacent prop'erties?
There are a variety of land uses wi4hin the Dier'mgerSchoal District; including
_ . . _ _ -
residential, commercial, indust�ial, institutiorial,uG7itjr, agricuifu�al, forestry, open
space, recreational, etc.
b. Has the site-been used for agricul4ure? If so;describe.
This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental
review.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Structures located on proposetl sites have been oY will be idenfified and described
during project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
d. Will anysVuctures be demolished? If so,what?
Structures to be demalished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific
environmental review process.
e. Whaf is thg current zoning class�cation of the site?
Tfiere are a va�iety of zoning classifications within ttie DieringerSchooi District. Site
speoific zaning`inforriiation fias been or will he identified during projeetespecific
enVironmentaf review.
f: What is the current comprehensive plan designatfon of the site?
An inventory of comp�ehensive plan designations has been or will tie complefed
during Project-spec�c enyironmental review.
g. If applicabte,what isthe cuRent sho�eline master program designation ofthe
site?
Anyshoreline fnaste�progPam designations have been or will be identified du�ing
project-spec�c environmental review.
h. Has any part of the site been classifietl a"s an"enVironmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
Environmenfally sensifive areas,if any,will be identified during project specfic
environmental review.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or woCk in the �ompleted
project?
This inforrtiation has been or virill 6e provided at the time of project-specific
enVironmental review.
j. ApProximately how many people would the completed project dispiace?
It is not antfcipated that proposed projects will displace any peopie. Dispiagement of
people, rf any,will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displaoement imPacts, if any:
Indiyidual projects included in tt9e Capital Facilitiss Plan will be su6Ject to project
specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally
proposed,
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible wi4h existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
C.ompa66ility of the proposal and spec�c projects with existing uses and plans.have
6een or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning pro.cess and during
project-specific environmental review.
9. Housing
a. Approximately liow many units would be provided 'rf any? Indicate whether
fiigh, middle, o�law-income housing.
No housing units would be provided.
b. Approximately how many unifs, if any,would 6e eliminated? Iridicate wfietfier
high, middle, or low-income housing.
Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be
evaluated during project-specific environmental reyiew procedures.
c. Proposed measu�es to �educe or control housing impacts, if any:
Measures to reduce orcontral any housing impacts;fiave been or will be addressed
during site-specifio, projectlevel environmental reyiew,
10. Aesthetics:
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not inciuding
antennas;what is4he principal exterior building material(s) propo§ed?
Aesthetic impacts have been orwill be deteRnined aT4he time ofsite-specific,
project-level environmental review.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered orobstructed?
Aesthetic impacts have been or will 6e determined at the tirne of site-spe��g,
project-level environmental review. '
c. Proposed measures to reduce or conVol:aesthetic impac#s, 'rf any:
Appropriate measuresto reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be
defermined at 1he time of project-spec'ific environmentaJ reyiew.
'11. Cight and Glare:
a What type of light or glare will 4he proposal produce?VHhat.time of daywould
it mainly occur7
Light or gla�e impacts haye been or will be determined at the time of project specfic
environmental review..
b: Could light or giare from the finished projectbe a safety fiaiard or interfere
with views?
Light or glare impacts have been or wili be defermined at the time of the project-
specific environmental review.
c: What existing off-sRe sou�ces of ligFit or glare may affect your prop"osal?
Off site sources of light or glare have been or witl be evaluated at the fiirte ofproject
specifig environ„mental review:
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impac#s; if any:
Mitigation of.light_and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project
specifo environrtiental review.
12. Recreation:
a. What designated and,informal recreational oppartunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
There are a variety of formal and infor.mai.recreational facilities within fhe Dieringer
School District
b. Would the qroposed project displace any existing recreafional uses? If so,
describe.
Recreational impacts have been or 4✓ilf be eddressed during project specific
environmental review. Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhence
recreational opportunities and uses.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impapts on recreation,including
recreation opportunities to be provided by tlie project or apqlicant, if any:
Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have
been or will besubject to mitigation during the envirnnmental review procedure.A
school site usually provides recreational facilities to tfie community in the fbrm of
additionai pley fields and gymnasiums.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservafion:
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national„state;or
lacal preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of
project-specfic emironmerrtal review.
b. Generelly descri4e ariy landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeologieal,
scienC�fic,or cultural impartance known 4o be on or next to the site:
An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted a.s part of projec.t
specific enVironmenfal review.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or conVol impacts, if any:
Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis.
14. Transportation:
a. IdenHfypublic streets and fiighways serving the site and describeproposed
access to the ezisting street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Impact on public streets andhighways has been orwill be assessed during projegt
specific environmental review.
6. Is site currently served by publictransit? If not,whet is the approximate
d,istance to the nearesf transit stop?
The rela4ionship between specific projects an.d public transit has been or will be
assessed during projsct specfic environmental review.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed projecf have? How many
would the project eliminate?
An inyentory of parking spaces and the impacts of spec�c projects on parking
spaces ha§tieen or will 6e conducted during project-spec��environmentat review.
d. Will fhe proposal.re.quire arry new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generaliy describe (indicste
whether pubiic or private).
The deVelopment of new schoolsmay require new access roads or streets:This
lssue will be fuily addressed during project-specific environmentai reView.
e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate viciniry ofl water, raii, or air
transportation?If so, generally describe.
Use of water, rail or air transportaUon has been or will be addressed during site
specific, project level environmentai review.
f. How many vehicular trips per day woutd be generated by 4he completed
projecf? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Each project proposal has been or will be separetely evaluated as to trafffic.impacts.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportatio� impacts, if any.
Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or wi0 be add�essed during project
specific environmental revlew.
15. Public Services:
a. 1Nould the project resulYin an increased need for public services (for
example:fire protection, police protection, health care, schools; otherj? If so,
generally describe.
The District does nat an#icipate 4hat fhe projects identifieti in the Capital Facilities
_ _. .. .
Plan.wiil substantially increase the need for other public§ervices. lmpacts ha4e been
or will be evaluaterJ on a project-specific basis.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public seryices, if
any.
Schools are built with automatic security systems,fire alarms;smoke alartns, heat
sensars and sprinkiersystems.
16. Utilities
a. Circle uUlities currently available at the site:electriciry, natural gas,water,
refuse service,tefephone,sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Utilities available at project sites have been or wili be identified during project speoific
environmentai review.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utiiity providing the
service, and the general construction acfivities on fhe site or in the immediate vicinity
which might be needed.
Utility revisions and constniction needs will be identified during project specific
emrironmental review.
C. Signatu�e
The ab.ove answers are true and complete tb the hest of rriy knowledge. I understand that
the lead agency is relying on them to make i4s decision.
Signature. _
Dr.Judy umei -I rtinson, Superinterid nf
Date Submitted: June 1, 2015
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because 4hese questions are very generai, it may be helpful to read itiem in conjunction with
t}ie list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these quesUons, be aware of the.extent the proposal or the types of
activfties likely to result from fhe proposai,would affect the item at a greaterintensity or at a
faster rate than 'if the proposaf were notimplementetl. Respond 6riefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likety to increase discharge to water; em'issions to air,
production, storage,or release of toxic orhazardous substances; or production of
noise?
To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed,
andlor renoyated or remodeled, some of these environmental irripacts wiil 6e more
likely.Additianal impertneable surEaces,such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks,
access roadsand playgrounds wi[I increase storm water runoff,which couid errter
surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result from heatingsystems;
emergency generators and other equipment, and fram additional car and bus trips to
and'from the school for students and faculty.Any emissions iesulting f�om this Plan
sfiould not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous
substances;with the possible exgeption nfstorage of diesel fuel or gasoline for
emerg"ency generating equipment Noise may result-from additional traffic and from
concentrating several hundred children at a new facflity, especially.before and after
schaol and during reqesses.
To the extent this proposal allows addi8onal residentiai de4eloPment to o�cu�;these
iiripacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those
impacts at this time.The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution
of housing,for example,whether single or multiple family and the.location of the
school.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Facilities,implementing the P,1an haye bee�or wilf be evaluated at the project specific
level and impacts will be mitigated accordirtgly: Storm water detention and runoff will
meetapplicable County and/or Ciry requirements and, depending on the date of
actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge.Elimination
System ("NPDES'� pertnitting requirements. Discharges to a'ir will be minimal, and
will meet any applicable requirements of fhe puget Sound Air Pollutian Control
Authority. Fuel oii w'ill be stored according to local and state requirements.
2. How would the propo.sai be likely to affedtplants, animals,fish, or marine life?
The Plan itself will have no impact on tlthese elements of the environment. Depending
on#he particular site, construction offacilities may require ciearing sftes of pfarifs and
loss of anirttal habitat.T.o the extent residential development is allowed, additional
area may be cleared and.eliminatedas habitat for animais. There a're not likely to be
any impact5 on fish a�marine life,althaugh some water quality degradation in
streams and rivers could occurdue:tg increased residential development l"hese
impacts haye been or w'ill 6e addre§sed in more detail during project,specifia
environmental reviewwhen appropriate:
PPoposed measures to protect or conserve planfs, animals,fish, or marine life are:
Individual projects wiil be evaluated and mitigated,appropriately on a project spec�c
basis, but specific mitigaHon proposals cannot be iden�ed at this time.
3. How would the proposal be likely'to deplete energy or natural resources?
Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and
- .. . . _
electrical energy. lncreased traffic resulfing from tFie constniction of additional
facilities would'con§urrie petroleum based fuels:Reduced traffic resulting from
conshucfion of another neighborhood schooJ,may also reduce amount§`of fuel
consumed; but'if is not possi6fe to quantify'suah reducUon in consumptionatthis
time. These iriipacts have 6een or will be addressed in more detail during project-
specific environmental review when appropriate.
Proposed measures.to protect orconserve energy and natural resources are:
Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency
standards.
4. How would the p�oposal be.likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive ar.eas or
areas designaYed(or eligible orvnderstudy)forgoVernmental protec@on; such as
parks,wildemess,wild and scenic rivers,th`[eatened or endangered.species habitat,
historic or cultural sites,weUands,floodplains;or prime farmlands?
The Plan and facilities constructeii puisuantdo tlie Plan shoutd have no impact on
these resources. It is noYpossible to predict whether otherdevelopment made
possible by this Pian would affect sensi6ve areas.
_ _ ...._ . . .
Rroposed measures to protect such resources or to apoid or re.duc.e impacts a�e:
No specific measures 8rebeing proposed at#his time. Appropriate measu�es have
been or will be proposed du�ing project spec�c review.Annual updates of this Plan
will be coordinated with Pierce County, City ofAubum and City of Sumner as part of
the Growth Management Act.process, one of,th_e purposes of which is to protect
enyironmentally sensitive areas.To the extent the Schooi DistricYs facilities planning
process is partofithe overall growth managementplanning process,these resources
are moreiikely to be protected.
5. How wouldthe proposal 6e likely to affect land andshore,line use;including whether
it viroultl allow orencourage land or shoreline uses'incompatib]e with ezisting plans?
The Ftan will not.haye any impacton land orshoreline use fhat is incompatibl.e
existing comprehensive'plans, land use codes, orshoreline management plans..
Propbsed measures to avoid,or reduce sho[eline and land use impacts are:
None are proposed at this.time.Actual facilifies constructed:to impiement#he Fian
will besited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts.
6. How would the proposal tie likely to increase demands on Vansportation or pu6lic
services and utilities?
This proposai should not createsubstantial new demands for Vansportation.The
projects included in fha Capital Facili4ies Plan may create an increase in tra�c'near
new,District facilities but also reduce traffic by creaUng tf9e opportunity for more
students to walk to a closer school.The construc6on of the facilities included in the
Capital Fac'ilities Flan may resuR in minor inereases in the demand forpub.lic
services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water,.sewe�, and
Nectric utilities:None of these impacts are likely to be significant:The impacts on
transportation and public services and utiliUes of the projects included in the Capital
Faciifies Pian wili 6e addressed during project-level review when appropriate.
Proposed measuresdo reduce oY respond to such demand(s) ares
No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at fhis time.
7. Identify, ifpossible;whetherthe proposal may conflict.with local, state, orfederal
Iaws or requirements fo�the protection of the environment
The Dieringer School District Gapital Facilities Plarv wili not conflict with any laws or
requirements for th"e protection of the enyitohment.
June 1, 2015
Electronic Transmittal of Draff- DNS & Draff-Checklist for SEPA Register to:
Washington State Department of Ecology—SEPA Unit
sepounit@ecv.wa.qov
County: Pierce
Lead Agency: Dieringer 5chool District No. 343
Lead Agency Contact: Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson
Lead Agency Phone: {253) 862-2537
Lead Agency Fle #: N/A
Ecology Fne #: 2015
Document Type: DNS
Description: Adopt 2015 Six Year Capital Fdcilities Plan by the schoo]
District for Planning purposes; amend the comp plans for
Pierce County, & cities of Auburn and Sumner to include
Plan.
Location: 5 '/a square miles.includes portions of Auburn, Sumner and
Pierc.e Co.unty.
Applicant: Dieringer 5chool District No. 343
Issue Date: June 1, 2015
Mail Date: N/A
Comment Due: June 15, 2015
Enter pote;
POLICY & TEXT AMENDMENT (PT #3)
INCORPORATE FEDERAL WY PUBLIC SCHOOLS #210
2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
— - ' �_ ', ' , - —� - o, - - - ,- ' ,. -
�
�� �:
� � � 0
i. ,,�,
LX' � ^e ��¢�I�� � ,�{ as+ .l�.`-'A-1". � -.C'k ' Ilt� xt� �Z�� ` t�: . .�.
y�i r K, ti�.^„� 1� � � w 3 ^j �C `,a.l'L"' x+ s ?^�. t�ve.�
`t�e1ar1�K. yf�,l � .t fu1 �a, .,,r� ,`�Tr�E�.- -.a,�.,M ,!�,,r/ "�_ � y, < . 'a,�. �,
1 � '"�'Svy�,h�c�'S+ •y a�x.-��.i. � ""` --y y -'�'"----=-.r----t ,'tS lf
�,�,•��1 I����1���`J"4""3� 4;I;,p��Y�i�+'�� ' , ,r"o.'� _.. �i^ 5����-�B \'�; 1,��:
.�,, Ys � y, f F �,1
� _,,,�6 � 'F�d P'" •'T i`� r F! ; �'J^ �� 3.. '�'.� rs IS(
� �� � 4�.�� u � ��,4fM � ���4 `��F I � �I 1i� � �I '1
� µ le? �t ' � t' � :)
:.` a"� "��i� �li � ��i . �i t ..� �r !' r � .. •�,;7'�� �J1
{� � (
S��C r :.�S��tS : , , I � � �i� ,:. � � II�t�. . �1�?"' Fn �i _ !1 ��
y-� C
��Jp��.ry il �^��� - l ' ,�a � � � Md'y ��`�Y p� :
:`1' .- 1��1'S -`�'r'�.ir ,-. �{.t . i Y , '�� J . tl� ,�k ..
�I � � �,�-r`1'�" '� � r- n. � �Ii V� � 1 ri+rm-�+x*rvis . A..�n If
�'r,� �r� `� �,,�xs:i� �'��,� �i�,r�:_. ,. ,�� ,Fs W �',y�,� , ��:. �;
� T �..����jr� �_ y 'b .y -.�." �_. I I� ����j . � ��Y}jV �� it< ...:
�� f.�F� �s� f .'�i�>> 14� � .a��\ y �f���t�.�'—�-��� �('7 � 'it � rI��� .F�,
�y � �'�1 h4����I't�l � _ F �"— �-� ry� 'f i . �� f . 1, "��
s��� �'� . � � I� �: � � i . � v1''�M�� �-�.������ � ��. ��. ' ^�e � h��J�:� ���.'.i
x
•'' � �j.F.'--K- ' 1 `' iY+�� , . { : .-���''� � .. " f t =,'� �,�,
a i_// 4
�v�`�FF��� r „F`�� '.I�- I .�.�� OI � I �'J�� r!I ! ,•�;'•
-�1" ¢ �� ) � �` � �p`� � ��� /���F�'� ���
in�.� ���� .+s� fi��, rt'����II,' �I :¢i i �,' �,:�' a,i�� � 1f hA�
.9�� �H'�5�� � ,5 ' � 7 I,� 'K��� � -� � rc � .-) � I �� r '
� II � � ('U���
. �1�7tm � � � ii� '�j± � i ''-u �' - Cy.�i�;' /i �.�"��'tiw+
�� 1 �1 va �+5��� �U� �� I i'�."-� '.�-�-� i � ���}i � �
,.,' i �, . b Y J �
` r�� a<`�'#'-�-rA Sx �..-,t� /� 9� ` '� `v' � '�.' "c' ^ � 1171' �r)l
�, ���w �t I�,�;._ �-- � t, ��l 1
?I '�i ,� ^ b�'r��f'�� ,'. 91:� �-�.. e;�� � �. � �i '
;�fz ���',� r.- � �'. � k�
Y �` rb ' �� �� � � �� � �� �t, '�`
^ V ,r - S.�_�. � �....,. .�.. at::�.=.-�"'�---•, n '" �0 ,i� � �� �.
� $ "� ��" j i
_���i lT�� '�, +�t: ,p,� 4 atn> � � ,.� 'E_FJ� }� �r/y,�.
y �Y =
^ r�� � iT' '� 7�s°' y�ti�� - � �
� rC'i/� r�" A. �u+Vak 7+ �i � /3�t•.�o 'sl n ?^" .� .n�ti1(�.""W � . i�,w 'r` . �-.-..`Y.
� ..� '1� �� "� j 'A'Z,��LI�?I�,A w',u� �'t�{�� 1� �{,.'�L'' T���¢ ' U 6/17I2015 sky piz:com�•
v., _`u _�S_ M�..-�Cr,'='i-..,.z�'i._,�c _.L'ni.f�- . �.i 1.��+ PtS k ..r,e��,�i ,
?% F'
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2016
CAPTTAL FACILTTIES PLAN
Aaoptea Juiy Za, zois
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Geoffery McAnalloy
Claire Wilson
Danny Petersdn
Cazol Gregory
Hiroshi Eto
SURERINTENDENT
Dr. Tammy Campbell
Prepared by: Tanya Nascimento
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
_ _ ___ _
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
INTRODUCTION 2-3
SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILTTIES PLAN
Introduction 4
Inventory of Educationai Facilities 5
Inventory ofNon-Instructional Facilities 6
Needs Forecast-E�cisting Facilities 7
Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8
Six Yeaz Finance Plan 9
SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction I1
Map- Elementary Boundaries 12
Map -Middle School Boundaries 13
Map-High School Boundaries 14
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction TS
Building Capacities 16-17
Portable Locations 18=19
Student Forecast 20-22
Capacity Summaries 23-2T
King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30
SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2015 31-33
PLAN
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 C:APITAL FACILIT'IES PLAN
_ _
INTRODUCTION
In re§ponse to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Ivlanagement Act
(SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee
Ordinances of King Counry Code 21A, City of Federal Way Oidinance No. 95-249
effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No3260 effecrive
Mazch 1996, and the City of tluburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998,Federal Way
Pnblic Schools has updated its 2016 Capital Facilities Plan as of lvlay 2015,
This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal
Way and tlie Ciry of Anburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Faciliries Plan element of the
Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not
adop.tad a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact
fees as part of the SEPA process.
The G;owth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas
within which urban growth can be encouraged. T7ie Grbwtli Management Planning
Coiincil adoptetl and racommended to the King County Council four Urban Crrowth Area
Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designarion was made within the
Federal Way planning azea, which encompasses Fedeial Way Public $ohools boundaries.
King County will encourage and acrively support the development of Urban Centers to
meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's
estimated population gowth is prepazed with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documenta6on for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of ttie Growth Management Act: This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may
prepaze interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need.
Currently, construction is underway to replace Federal Way High School and to increase
capacify b'yapproximately 200 students. Federal4Vay High Sckool was built in 1938.
The estunated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is$l Ob million. The Dish-ict
began Phase I in Summer 2014. Phase I consists of site wo;k and prepararion for the
portable village that will house students during the construcuon of the new building.
Phase II, demolition of the e�cisting classrooms and rebuild, begau in January 2015. T'kie
ezisting cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during constiuction.
Construcrion of the new building will continue throughout the 2015-16 school yeaz and
shonld be adailable for use beginning in the 2016-17 school year.
The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and
capacity at our schools. SHB 2776 will continue to phase in full-day kindergarten for all
stndents and decrease K-3 class size from 20 to 17. This is proposed to be fully funded
by 2017-18. Another factor is the passing of Initiative Measure 1351. Tliis measure
reduces class sizes at High Poverty schools from 17,undei SHB2776,to 15 for K-3
students, from 27, urider the current funding formula,to 22 for grade 4, and from 27 to 23
forgrades 5-8: For the 2U15-16 school yeaz, 19 out of 21 elementary schools audboth K-
8 schools azedesignated as High Poverty. The implementarion of SHB 2776 and the
passing of Initiatiye Measnre 1351 have created a need for 150 additional classmoms at
our elementary and K-8 schools by the 2017-18 school year. This is the equivalent of 5
2
FEDER:AL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPTTAL FACII,ITIES PLAN
and a half elementary schools. In addition, Iniriarive Measure 1351 calls for class size
reductions at our middle and high schools also.
We will also continue to stndy school bodpdaries as new housing and fluctuating
populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the
coming yeazs. The maps included in this Plan reflect our current boundaries.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PL.AN
_ __
SECTION 1 -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be
gathered to detemune the facilities available and needed to meet ttie needs ofa growing
cominunity.
This section provides information about carrent facilities, existing facility rieeds, and
expectad future facility;equi;ements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan
that shows expected funding for any new construcrion,portables and modernization listed
follows this.
4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS(K-51
Adelaide 1635 SW 304`"S[ Federal Way 98023
Brigadoon 3601 SW 336`"St Federal Way 98023
Camelot 4041 S 298�'St Auburn 98001
Enterprise 35101 5`"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Green Gables 32607 47`�Ave SW Federal Way 98023
L,ake Dolloff 4200 S 308�'St Auburn 98001
Lake Grove 303 SW 308`"St Federal Way 98023
Lakeland 35827 32°d Ave S Aubum 98001
Maazk Twain 2450 S Stai Lake Rd Federal Way 98003
Meredith Hill 5830 S 300'� St Aubum 98001
Mirror Lake 625 S 314t° St Federal Way 98003
Naurilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003
Olympic View 2626 SW 327�'St Federal Way 98023
Panther Lake 34424 ls`Ave S Federal Way 98003
Rainier View 3015 S 368'�St Federal Way 98003
Sherwood Forest 34600 12'�Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Silver Lake 1310 SW 325'�Pl Federal Way 98023
Star Lake 4014 S 270`"St Kent 98032
Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032
Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023
Valhalla 27847 42°d Ave S Auburn 98001
Wildwood 2405 S 3001h St Federal Way 98003
Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16'"Ave S Des Moines 98198
11-IIIDDLE SCHOOLS(6-81
Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9`"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Kilo 4400 S 308'"St Aubum 98001
Lakota 1415 SW 314'"St Federal Way 98023
Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003
Saghalie 33914 19'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Sequoyah 3450 S 360i°ST Aubum 98001
Totem 26630 40"'Ave S Kent 98032
TAF Academy(6-12) 26630 40'"Ave S Ken[ 98032
HIGH SCHOOLS(9-121
Decatur 2800 SW 320`"St Federal Way 98023
Federal Way 30611 16�'Ave S Federal Way 98003
Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288�'St Aubum 98001
Todd Beamer 35999 16'"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Cazeer Academy at Truman 31455 28�'Ave S Federal Way 98003
ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS
Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28'"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Merit School(6-12) 36001 IS`Ave S Federal Way 98003
Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 2151 Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Federal Way Acceleration Academy 2104 S 314'"St, Ste 2104 Federal Way 98003
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL F.ACILITIES PLAN
_._. __. __ _
CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILTTIES
Develoaed Propertv
Ceptral Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003
Federal Way 1vlemorial Field 1300 S 308'� St Federal Way 98003
Educational Seivices Center 33330 8`�Ave S Federal Way 98003
Support Services Center 1211 S 332°d St Federal Way 98003
Surulussed.Suace
Undevelooed Prbpertv
Site Location
_ _ _ -- --- -- - - - -
#
75 SW 360th StrBet& 3rd Avenue SVJ—9.2 Acras
65 S 351 st Street&52nd Avenue S—8,8 Acres
60 E of l Oth Avenue SW - SW 334th&SW 335`" Streets - 10.04 Acres
73 N ofSW 320'�and east of 45`"PL SW—23.45 Acies
71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres
82 1�`Way S and S 342°d St—Miniinal acreage
96 S 308'"St and 14`�Ave S—36 Acres
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties aze large enough to meet school constrbction
requirements,. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations aze needed
to house students in the District.
6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST- EXISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS _
Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is
Portables Im act Fees.
Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Capital levy request
Increase Ca aci
As part of the mniti-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school
students with expansion af the Federal Way High School site. Increased capacity at
Federal Way High and Decatur High in later phases, supplant the need foi construction of
a fifth comprehensive high school.
7
FEDERAL W.AY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL Ft1CIL1TIES PLAN
_ _ __. . .___ _ _
NEEDS FORECAST-ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
NER'FACILTfY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE
OF FUNDS
No current plans fqr additional facilities.
8
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CARITAL FACILITIES PLAN
S�Year Rinance Plan
Secured Funding Sources
Im actFees� 1 SI791321
Iand�SaleFunds� 2 St;(r{8,A03)
BondorlPv Funds 3 S13,599,421
State Match 4 513;097,850
TOTAL 521 69�736
Projected Reveoue Sources
StateMatch 5 E34,000000
BondorLev Funds 6 Y56,000,000
LandFund�Saks 7) SO
t acl Fees 8 52,800.000
TOTAL 592,800;000
ACtll3I anCI PI8tlI1Cd EXpCRdIII1CCS Total�SecuredFundingandProjecredResenuc 51�14,669,736
NF.W�SCHOOLS Fetimatedand Bu et 2017 201Si 2019 � 2020 2021 2022 Total TofalCost
Prior]'exre 2015-16 20I677 2017-18� �� 2018-19 2019-20 �2020-21 �. 2021-22 2016-2022
MODNRNI7A170N AND NaPANS10N
Fede�alWa Hi h�School(9 $27000000 546,000,000 S23,OOD,000 §4,000,000 E6,000�,000 579,�00 5106000,000
Sil'EAC ULS1770N
ortnanCenter $990�000 5215000 $220,000 5225,000 5235,000 5235,000 SI,130,000 52920,000
lo mentTranstion�Pro ram 10 �
'fIlNPORARY�FACILLI7FS
Pottabks- 1�1 51600000 $200,000 $200,000 S20Q000 $20Q000 $200000 �$200000 52,SIX7, 52800000
TOTAL $27990b00 S47 I5�000 $23420000 54,425;000 $6�435�,000 5435000 $200,OU0 S2U0000 582�930000 51/0920000
NOTFS:
'L These feu are currenity being 6eld in a KingCouNy,City ofPWeral Wey end Cily of Kent iinpact fee account,and will be
availableforuseby4heDistriciforsystemunprovenxn�s. Thaisyearendbalenceon@/31/14.
2.Tfia is�yearend balanwon t2l31/14.
3. This is the�12/3U14�balance ofbond funds and cepitel lery funds. This figure�includu intuest earnin�..
4: This represrnts the balance of State Malch Funds which will be used lo�lo support lhe rebuildingofFederal Way Hi�School.
Thk is ihe balance on 12/3 U14.
5.This is anticipated Stffie Match fonthe rebuilding of Faleral Way Hi��School. Appiication Por funds'waz�made in July 2013.
6.7hge mclude S IOm of vo[er epproved,but no�asued end a 546m of Ihe 560m sis-year levy appmved in November 2012.
7.Pmjecled sale ofsurplus properties.
8.These are projected fees bascd upon Anown raidenlial develapmen�s in�he Dis�ricl over the netl s'vcyears.Th's fiptre assumes El[3m Pocthe[hree new multi-family complexes
bemg buil[im2015 and'E25;000 per month for.�he neb five years.
9.Projectbudpef_has been adjusted�b metch curcrnl piojat cos�estimates.
10.Nornw�Center waz purchased in 2010 to house�he Employrcrcnt-Trensition�Progarn. The S2.Im purchase haz been financed throu�a stare appmved LOCALprogvn Ihrou��2020.
ILThesefearepresenithecostulpu¢tiesu�gandi�a�allingnewponables. ThepoMablee�enditureinfutureyears��yieplacee��mgportables��hal.arem�functional.
These nay not increase capacity a�d ere nol included�in ihe capecity swnmary. �
9
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPIT?,L FACII,ITIES PLAN
This page has been intentionally left blank.
10
FSDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 -MAPS OF DISTRICT BOLTNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools has 1wenTy.-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two
schools with a K-8 grade configiiration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four
high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public
_.
Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades b-
12 who reside in the Totem Middle School seryic.e area. The programs at Career
Academyat Truman High School serves students in grades`9-12.
The following maps show the service area boundaazies for each school, by school type.:
(Cazeer Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve
students froin throughout tHe District). The idenufied 6ouridaries are reviewed annually.
Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations
may necessitate a change in school service azeas.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to Haridle riew housing developriients. In the case of most pnblic
faciliries,new development has its major unpact on the facilities immediately adjacent to
_ .
that development. School Districts are different. ff the District does not have permanent
facilities available, interim measnres;must be taken until new facilities can be built or
un61 boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding
faciliues.
Adjusting boundaries requues cazeful consideration by the Disirict and is not taken
liglitly. It is recognized that there is a pofential impact on sfudents who are required to
change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that a single housing devel6pment does no.t reqnira the
conshuction of a complete school Facility. School districts are required to pro;ject growth
throughout the disfrict and liuild or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the
district, not just around a single development.
11
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
- s
Federal 1fVay ,
Public Schools ;�l
� t � p�`
,
� EIFMENTA0.YXHO�LS Q MIDDLESCHO�LS � � '
3 l�DElA1QEELEF4ENfAAY 36 FWPUBLI{ACADEMY ��1
�2 BRIGAp00NElEMENTARY 30 ILIAHEEMIDDLESCNOOI , � �',
� 'k+ .
3 UMEIDTELEMENTARY 31 KILOMIDDLESCHOOI � �.' a `
6 EN7ExPRISEELEMENTArtY jZ LAKOTAMIDDLESCFIOOL ��' — fi�� '
�5 GREENGA9IESELEh1EMARY .a�,a yi[yq�ry�MIDDLF$CHODL l ' �`` � '
d tAKE00LLOFFEtFMEfY7NRY 3q yGHAI.IEMiDDLESCHOOL � . �"('� 4.
� LAKEGROVEELEMEMf�RY 37 SEQWYkHMIDDLFSL}i00L .f; ``—"'�} ,—� '
S UKEUN�ELEMEf�TARY — i�
35 TOTEMMIDDLES[HOOL � ' �:�'�� 7
9 MARKTWAIN ELEMENTRRY �{ TAFAtADEMY •,� . �� c • ' t�
10 MEREDRHHILLEIEMENfARY � i �'�� �
11 MIRRURLAKEELEMENFAItY HIGH3CHOOLS Ji � `� ~ _ � � �
12 NRIfIILlFSK-BSCFY30L �' .. .. �,, -� :` � � "
13 OLYMPICVIEWELERiEXTA0.Y � DEUNRHIGH �_ � " �
ai FEDERAL WAY NIGN i �
16 PANTHENIAKEEIEMENfARY e��
15 MMIERVIEWELEMENTAftY �3 THOMFSJEFFEAi�RHIGH �rt� -��. r ' m
15 SNEftWOO�f-0R6TEIEMENTMY a' TOb08EAMERHIGH I4�,! �,�-a�
1] SIWENtAI(EEIEMENTARY �� �REE0.ACADEh1Y�TRUMAN �y�y'„� . '..p,,,�� ��
18 STAICLAKEELEMEN(ARY 51 ETPINpRM1UN�[ENTER L� ��. � u .
19 SUNNYCAESfELEMENTARY � - .
20 TWIN LAKESELEMENTMY � ADMINISTRATIVE 5[TES '�'�s'fiy� � � � � � -"
� y
21 VALHALLAELEMENTAR'f 'F� " � � � r
r "
22 WIWWWDELEMENTqRY �.�i � � ' "�
23 WOODM1/OfiTN�5LH00L L �
i - � � i
� FYYGS GftOPERTY � �� � � '-{ � y ±
�r a+
j � � �� Y L
��� _ �- s�.,, "�y$.
-Y
� i � � �? Y�
-�E J � _fl:: �Y�+ _
�Z� .: � _.` e.� 1 i 7 �. r
\ Y •"�'.i _ �t � �� - ..-;: i :. L
y�� .Z — _ - ti _.
I °
_ $ 4 ; �J{ �,. .�. �
. a�, ._ I
'� z �'
_ � # ,i'
_ _ � � �
_ � c� ' ,'�k ,
ti
� �q �-
A ��
.!" y¢ t V�, ;`� ') ': �
ELEMENTARY ` 3�� = ��.��- ,,_ ,:3 �, .. " _ � ,
3" 4'.�'- e ': --�� � ; .. c
BOU111DARIES .��-� - �'� � � '�. �-
� � _;� , � :
�� ��.� � � a
�a � a a
�� —� �
�
0�393 O6 G9 12
�Mks
Da[e:b.2.I2
iz
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHO.OLS_2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
� � Federal Way r
� � � Public Schools Q,'Ff
,,
� ELEMEMARYSCNOOLS � MIDDLESCHOOLS � 4 �pa' �
1 APELAIDEELEMENlAftY 35 FWpUg�ICACADEMY f�l,� �) --g.�__ -. ,
i BNIGADWNEtEMENTArtV 30 ILLHHEEMIDDLESCHDOL � {hri 7e''
3 cr,ME�nrELEhaEN7Am 31 KILOMIDOLFSCHOOL _ ,
a ENTEHPe15EELEMENTARv 32 UtK�TAMIDDLESCHWL t � �
5 GftEENGA6lE5ELEMENTARY 33 SACAIAWEAMIODLESCHDOL 1���y �
5 LtKE00LLOFFELEMENTARY j,} SAGHALIEMIDDLESCH60L �� 7:� E
] LP,KEGPOVEELEMENTAXY '�J��� �
37 SEQWYAHMIDDLES[FID6L � S , ! ""
8 LAKEIANOELEMENTAHY 35 TOTEMMIDDLES[HDOL 't �r+��I ,
3 MARK24L'AINEIEMEMTARY 3gy TAFACADEMV ^ �� � ! f"' `
10 MEREDRHHILLEIEMENTA0.Y - 1 t��- ' �
11 MIRR�RIAKEELEMENTARY H16XSCHOOLS L� � / l
]2 NAVfILU5�KA5LH00L � � �
13 OLYMPICVIEWELEMENTARY a0 �E{ANRMI6H � � -
Sd PANTHERIAKEEIEMENTAHY a3 FEDERAIWAYHIGH '�j�{(
IS MINIERVIEW ELEMENfARY aZi TIi�MkS)EFFER59N NIGH yy� � �-�, y
Ifi SHEflW000f-0PESTEIEMEPf�ARY 45 TOD�BEAMEftNIGH -
a9Q UREERACApEMY��TRUMAN � � t�
ll 51LVERLAI(EEIEMENTARY � � �t� � �
18 SfARIAKEELEMENTARY 51 ETPfN6RMNNLENiER j.•; �
19 SIINNYCRESfELEMENiARY � ' � ,
20 TWMlAKESEIFMENTA1tY � qpMAJZSTRATIVE�SITES 1 i � � *-
21 VALXALLA�ELEMENTARY Y � - � - . �
� �a
22 WILDWO00 ELEMENTRflY { 2
23 WOODMONTKSSCHOOL `J � r,+i _
i�
� FWPSPROGERTV � } � �Y �,�,_ r t
L� 1 . �
r 1 .. . � �L � .,,
i i_ �'
.�-��.r��] � �?� � � . w � � ��j
� .� ��1` I f
, .a - i
� �
� "�.� ' '� ;y�'� Y Ut ! . . �
-,i�r. ,y� �y� ��
t �� � ° � f
'� � � a �,4
ii 7 �
� ,� r , � ,I ;
MIDDLE � ��`
SCHOOL � ' ��� ` � ' '`
- , t
BOUNDARIES < I�`,"j � �'`�, � � �
, ,�
� ,
�W lII3 66 69 L2
Mks
6ake:5.4.32
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
� ''k ' Federal Way r��
� s Public Schools Qf;
�
� EIEMENTARYXH00L5 � MI6DLFSCHODLS � ��Y� �1°p .¢g�� �
1 kDEtAIDEELEMENiARY 36 FWPOBLICACADEMY ; �2..*_- ��- ,
2 BRIGAD�NEIEMENTARY 39 ILIAHEEMIDDLESCHOQL ' ' ��
e
3 can�iniaEmEwum 31 K�LOMI�DLES[HOOL ,
8 ENTEftPRISEELEMENTANY � �,pKOTAMIDDLE5CN00L 4 \
5 GREENGABLESELFRAENTARY 1 �
33 SAWAWEAMIDDLES?IODL \' '
s uiiEooLLOFCEtEMENitixY 3q y�GHP1IE�MIDDLE5CH00L �. v ��--'y �,
] LAKEGROVEEIEMENTARY ��
3J SEQUOYAHMIDDLEStH00L I
9 LAKEUN�ELEA1ENiARY i
9 MAH1crnAINELEeAENfnRY 35 T6TEMMN�LESCNOOI � - � + �� � ��
10 MERE�IfHHILLEIEMEMARY 381 TAFACADEMY { f' i t {� !...,`
11 MIRRaR L0.NE ELEh1ENTAAY � � . � j� p+}
12 NAl1T1LU5KA5Cli]OL � NI6NXHOOlS �1 y��
60 DECANR HIGH ����
13 OLYMPICVIEW ELEMENTRRY I � - 1
dl FE�EMLWAYHIGH �
id PpNTHERIAKEEIEMENTARY �� lV
15 MINIERVIEN'EIEMENfPRY an THOMASJEFfEP50NNIGH � - � � �� y
S6 SHER�S'6h�iDRESfEIEMEfRARY 65 TOP�BEAMERHIGH /� I _ ��' �
17 SILYEfltAKEE1FAENTARY 4A CAREERACADEMY�TRI1h1AN ��
18 STA0.IAKEELEMENfARV 53 ETPjNORFMN�CENfER �+ Ct � '
19 SUNNYCRESfELEMENTARY , � � ` '
2a TWINlAKESELEMENTARY � ApMA'ISTR4TIVESIIES ;{� � " `
21 MLHALLAELEMENTARY r� �� � - . . .
22 WIL�WW�ELAIENTA0.Y ., r��
23 WOOPMONf KF SCHOOL '�y,;, - t4� k'
� ��A � • � �
FWPS PitOPERT/ ,{ I' � ,� ` � . 'i, i
�t' �} 1 . _ _ 1
��
/�� Q � �
�. - ��� ; �, , a c
�
, L5_�. . J��� � . �. .�> - � �
� -� -
�^ ' `� � + �
�r �' , � : „�
f
� F . r,i, � , f� I. .. -
.r � .�
'
\ .. � , l t1 . �J F,{
,� �' o ,! na
; � � 'i � ��
� � 1 � �
��_ � � ,
1-1IG H rh � • � ' � ,�
SCH�OL � 1 ti � , � , � � �
BOUND/�RIES � I�' � �
�,
-1�:� 3 � �
�
r�
� oniaa ¢e us iz
�M�.
--
Date:3.4.12 -
14
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCiJMENTATION
Building Capacities-The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast—2016 throagh 2022
Capacity Sununaries
King County Impact Fees -.Single and Mu1ti-Family Units
15
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Building Capacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the Disizict's"standard of service"in order to ascertain ttie
DistricYs current and fufpre capacity. The Superintendent.of Pnblic Instructiomestablishes squaze
footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into considerarion the educarion
progazn needs.
In .general, the District's current tazgef class size provides that the average class size for a
standard classroom for gades K through 2 should be 20 students. Due to cunent economic
conditions, the tazget class size for K through 2 has been temporarily increased, With the
legislari4e compliarice witli McCleary, we intend to dedrease K th'oygh 3 class sizes.to 17 by the
2017-18 school yeaz. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For gades 6 to 12 the tazget class
size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special
Educarion)needs aze calculated at 12 seatsper classroom.
Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line,the District has calculated a program
capacity foralT schools. The followinglist clarifies the adjustmentsto the OSPI calculation.
Music Rooms:
Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction.
All Day Kindergaifen:
Every elementary schoo]operates only all day Kindergarten programs. These all day
Kindergarten progams require.addirional capacity because the standard classroom is available for
one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will:operate 84 sections of all.
day Kindergar[en in 2015-16.
Special Education Resource Rooms:
Each elgmentary and middle sch'ool requiies the use of a standard classroom(s)forspecial
education students requiring instruction to address specific disabiliries.
English as a Second Language Programs:
Each elementary,middle school and high school requires the use ofa standard classroom for
students learning English as a second language.
Middle School Computer Labs:
Each middle school has compu;er labs,except Totem Middle SchooL Wireless access has b.een
installed at alLsecondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed,these eomputer labs
may be converted to mobile carts.
High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource);Room:
Each kugh school provides special education resource room and cazeer development classrooms
for students requuing instrucrion to address specific disabiliries.
PreschooUE CEAP/Headstart:
Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs&typically developing
students at 8 eleinentary schools, We also ha4a the ECEAP and Headsfart program,at 6 s.chools
(4 elementary&3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites.
Alternative Learniug Esperience:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an AlternaUve Learning Expecience
through our Internet Academy: These studenu have never been included in the capacity
calculation of unhoused studants.
_ _ _.. _ . _ _...
16
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
II.F11�1�tE1VTARY BUII.DING MIDDLE SCI�OOL BUILDING
PROQtAM CAPACII'Y PROGRAM CAPACITY
SctioolName. Headcount SchoolName �Headcouni � ��FI'E
Adelaide 361 Illahee 770 7.78
Bri adoon 258 Kilo 759 267_ .
Cairelot 255 Iakota 757 765
Ente rise � 410 Saca'awea .615: - --621 �
Caeen Cables , 412 Sa halie 750 758
Lake Dolloff 415 S ' uo a}i - 544 549
Lake Caove 352 Totem 739 746
Iakelaud= . .. .- -.___ _ 361 Federal Wa Public Aeade 199 201
MarkT�wain �� �- � � 344 Technolo Access Foundation Acade *•
Meredith Hill 425 Merit School""
MitrorLake 337 TOTAL 5133 - - 5185
Nautilus.(K-8), 336 --
Oly�ic Yew 340 *NTdBe School A�era e 705 712
PantherLake 410 -
RainierVew. 401 HIGH$CHOOLBUII,DING
SherwoodFoiesf. 395 PROGRAMCAPACITY
Silver Iake 402
----
=-Lake 328 SchoolName _ Headcount —.FTE�-
ciest 391 Decatur 1189 1,272
.t Lakes. 309 Federal W a 1431 1 30
Valhalla 379 Thomas Jeffecson 1282 1 71
Wildwood 312 Todd Beamer _1082. 1 157
Woodmont -8 335 CareerAcad atTruman _153_. . Y64 -
TOTAL 8,268 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117
� lo menfTransitionPro ram 48 51
Technology Access Foundation Academy'"
Dementary.4�erage � -359 Merit School**
TOTAL - _ . 5 94 5662.
_ — - - _ _
*ITi hSchoolA�era e 1 46 1�33
No[es:
* Fede@(Way Public Academy,CareerAcademy at Truman High School,and F�loyment Tcansition Program
are non-boundary schools. T'hese schools are not used 'm the calculated avernges.
*"Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables
on the TotemMiddle School site. Merit School ishoused entirely in
portables on the Illahee Middle School site.
17
FEDERAI,WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constiturion requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not an efficient use of District r8soiuces to bnild a.school witti a capacity
for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 stu,d.enu when enrollment fluctuates
throughout the yeaz and from yeaz to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when
increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be reqiiired
to house stndents wtien new or changing programs require additional capacity. ,They also
provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and
consiructed. When peimanent facilities become available, the poitable(s) is eithei used
for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for
an interun classmom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical
condition. In these cases,the District may choose to buy new portables arid surplus these
unfit portables. It is the pracUce and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that
portables aze not acceptable as permanent facilities.
The District is investigating altematives to portables. We are currently in the planning
phase of designino buildings that would require shorter construction time and provide
permanent classro.om sp.ace for our stpdents. These buildings may replace the need for
portables in the future.
The following page provides a list of the locarion of the portable faciliries, used for
temporary educarional faciliries by Federal Way Public Schools.
18
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN _ _ _
PORTABLELOCATIONS
PORTABLFS LOCATID PORTABLFS LOCATID
AT F1.F111IF1VTARYSCHOOIS AT EIIGH SCHOOIS
NON NON
INSI'HUC'1'IONAL INSTRUCTIONAI. INSTRUCTIONAL INSiRUCT10NAL
.Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 8 1
Bri adoon 1 Federal Wa 2
Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson, 10
— __ _ .
Fiite rise 3 Todd Beamer � -� � 8
Caeen Cmbles 1 TAF Acade 8 2
Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 36 3
Iake(3rove 1 I
Iakeland
Mark Twain � � .3.. � �
141erodith Hill 1 2
Murorlake 10 PORTABLF3 LOCATID
Nautilus 1 AT SUPPORT FACII.ITIFS
Olympic Vew 2
Panther Lake 4 MOT
RamierYew 1 2 TDC 5. _
SHenvood Forest 2 2 TOTAL 5
Silver�[ake 4
Star Iake 4
Sunn crest 4 HEADSTARTPORTABLFSA'CDISTRIC'I'SITES
Twm Lakes 1 2
Valh�alla 4 Shenvood Forest 1
Wildwood 4
W oodmont 3 Total 1
TOTAL 51 18
PORTABLFS LOCATFD
AT MmDLE S CHOOIS
non
INSTIIUCI'IONAL [NST6UCTIONAL
Illahee 3
Kilo 7
Lakota
Saca awea 4
Sa halie 1 3
So uo ah 2
Totem
Merit 3
— ---
TAF Acade S. 2
TOTAL 18_. 15.
. � In the201415&2015-16 school years,students at Federal W ay HS�will be hoased'm a portabk village daring
construction of the new classrooms.
19
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projecrions aYe a basic comp.onent of budget development.
Enrollment pmjections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget
prepazation.. The majority of staffmg requirements aze derived directly from the
forecasted number of students. Allocations for instrµctional supplies and materials are
also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue
pro�ections aze d'veotly related to enrollment projections.
Enrollment projecrions are completed annually in the Business Services Deparlment.
Projections must be detailed at various 1ev01s, dis.trict total, school-building tofals,grade
level and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis
of a group that has a commoii statistical value(grade level) as it progresses through time.
In a stable popularion the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysisuses
historical informarion to develop averages and project the averages forwazd. Tliis
method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each
grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted
factors to stndy several projections. Because iransfers in and out of the scfiool system aze
common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases
survival rates. En1ry grades(kindergarten)aze a unique problem in cohort analysis. The
district collects inforuiation on birth rates within the district's census tracts,and treats
these statistics as a cohort for ldndergarten enrollment�n the appmpriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various starisrical methods for projecting
student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments aze avalnated below..
The first method is a statisrical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These
are forecast of enrollment for one year. Tlie projections vary depending on the iiumber of
years of historical information and how they aze weighted.
A secondmethod is a projection using an enrollment projectionsoftware package that
allows the user to project independenfly at school or grade level and to aggregate these
piojec.tions for the district level. The Eniollment Maste;TM software p;ovides statisrical
methods including trend line, standard grade progression(cohort) and combinarions of
these methods. This soBwaTe produces a five-yeaz projection of school enrollment.
In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projecrions for the
Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013: The model used
_ _
to forecast next yeaz's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measwe grade to grade
growth, assumes market sliaie losses to private schools(consistent with connty-wide
average), asspmes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migrarion.
This forecast was pmvided as a range of three projections. The long=range forecast
provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates liased
on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used
for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
something else(e.g. population) dr that eni�olltitent will mirror some projected trend for
the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calcularions to
provide a range of possiblepiojections for the Disfrict to the yeaz 2022. This inodel
produces a pmjection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when apglied to the low,
medium and high ran�e modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning
and is consistent with estimates from various models.
Long-range projections that establish the need For facilities are a modification of the
cohort survival method. The cohort mettiod of analysis becomes less reliable the farther
out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projecrions
are studied annually. The study inclndes inFormation from the jnrisdictional
demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range
piojections used by Federal WayPublic Schools reflect a.similaz age trend in student
popularions as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the
State of Washington.
Neaz term projections assume some growth from new housing,which is offset by current
local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting
jurisdictions. Currently there are three new multi-family complezes planned witlrin the
District. These three complexes have a total of 819 units. All three developments will be
open and ready for occupancy within the 2015-16 school-yeaz. Long rangeplanning
assumes a student yield from proposed new lio.using consistent with historical giowth
pattems.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty yeazs. The
Federal Way School District-is a pamier in this planning with the various jurisdicrions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district community in the future.
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections
Sanplified FTE(K Headwunt=.5 FTE;M iddle School FTE=.99 Headcount;Hi�School FTE_.935Headcount)
Total K-12 Percenf�
CalendarYr School Year- Demeutary Midme Scbool HighBchool FfE Ckange
2010 2009-10 8,738 5,119 6,594 20,451
2011 2010-11 8,753 5,142 6,544 20,439 -0.7°h
2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 2Q382 -03%
2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -OJ°h
2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6;354 20;384 OJ%
2015 2014-1'S 9,177 4,884 6,393� 20,454 0.3°/a
20t6 82015-16 9,269 4,968 6,349 20,585 0.6°k
20L7 P201b17 9,31Z 5,740 6,091 20,554 -0.1%
2018 P2077-78 9,400 5,152 6,054 10,606 03%
2019 PIOlB-19 9,497 5,725 6,207 20,829 I.I°k
2020 P2019-20 9,567 5,260 6,167 11,088 1.2%
2021 P2014Z7 9,644 5,355 6,396 17,395� 7.4%
2022 PZOZI-12 9,763 5,407� 6,430 21,600 0.9%
ElmrentaryR-5 MiddleSchoo! 6-8 NighSchoof9-12�
Enroliment Hi�ory and Six Year Forecast.
22.000 -- -
za,000
Zo,aao
19,000
18.000
n,00a
�s,000
15,000
`'q� `'o `'o `'o `'o `'o @i� a � �Oa "0ao 'O� '�
`�i 4i '� i �`�i 'i �'� ��4' ��' ��R ��P `'4 `'i
o � e� u� v a` �rn '� 'w 'y `'o `'i i�.�
SchoolYear
.�
22
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN __ _
Cauacitv-Summaries
All Grades, Elementary,lyliddle School, and High Schools
The Capacity ,Summaries combine Bnilding Capacity information and the Student
Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled
__
facilities and why there is a need for the Dishict to use temporary facilities or interim
measnres.
The information is organized in.spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
Dishict, and then evalnating capacity vs. ntunber of $tudents at elementary, middle
school, and high school levels individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide informarion about what facilities are
in place each year.
•2 3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPIT.SL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUIIM7ARY-ALL(�tADFS
Bud et __ Pro'ectedr��
CalendarYeaz 2016 ��2017� � 2018i-� - 2019'�� -� 2020 � �2021 2022
CA.PACTTY SchoolYear 2015-16 201617 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 202021 2021-22
BUIIDING PROGRAM
HEADCOiJNT CAPAEiT.Y 18,695 18,695 18;895 18,895 18,895 18,895 1$89i
�._.� . ';CAPACITYm_.__». ._,.._ , ..._....,..,,. �.,.::.�-_: 19,115:':��. �79i1Sa.'..;19,315., ;:19315...39;315 . .19,315 . '"79;315.
��- - --- � �------_��.— -_—_._ _.._ . .- --� ---�� --- �--- ----- ------- ----
Add or subtract.changes to capac�ty
i �
�
a t �, ��' - i . � . � . ,
Inc�eas_e CapaclCy at$edernl W ay HS ��'� �r � '� '�{. ; j � 'i' � '
Ad'ustedPm ramHeadcount_Ca aci 18,695 18,895 �18,895 ]8,895 �18,895 18,895 18,895
.._._.. ..,...,. � ..,. ,� ....- ' -._ . , .. �.;_ �.
.....�Ad usted Pro ramF.TE'Ca am .....:. .......�.._.._._ .19,115:.�,19,315i..1.19,315 .,:19,3�15_.:19;315,.._19,315zr.�.19;315...
INROLLMEIVVT
BasicF'fEFnrollmeat 2Q586 20;554 2Q606 �2Q829 21�,088� 21;395. 21,600
� � Basic F2'Ec�adre���'t'ollment(AAETE) (315) , (315) (315) (315} (315 (315 (315)
�
_.. .i`vithout,"5lteima't Adad.__`-�. .26;271; i10;-239� :20;291 . 34 20;7�3.�t .21,0�,; .Z1,-285':
SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSID)
s..;_..__..rPRO.�2AM:FPECAA�Cl3?X�:.::....:_�._.(1�156.,�(924 __ 976) `.�,199 ,.(s1;�8) , 1;�5). 1;97A
RQ,OCATABLECAPACITY
.CS�rrent Portable Capaoity 2,375 2,525 2,450 2;450 2,450 2,450 2�,450
�uct Portable Capacity � ' � } " �' � �� ; , � ' I' ! �
�
;�
AddNaw�PortablaCapaciry � � � , l���. �i � ' r � � � , �".� ` . �,� �;.�,
!a1L' .1 � � f '0� iIV E � d , ��' � .. .
� ;
._�.. A ' sierl`:�Porta3ile'CaPacrtY.-_._.�. :,__,,_..._ �525$�' ��2,4$0"�..; 2,450�..i��2;4-. . 2;4�mh'. 3,-4�� r.�.,-2,450 �
- - � - - -._._ --- - ---- - --��---- - �------ --- --�--
SURPLL6 OR(UNHOL6ID) . _ . .- _ . ._ - . - _ .
PROGRAM AND RII.00ATABLE
_`'rCAI'ACII'�:::�_�. -=--_- 136+4�� _1 Z6��I479t.�l° Sl__�93'.: 8S_:`'_�4 U.:,;
24
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SGHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
_ _
CAPACI1YSiR1M�1RY-II.IINQ�ITARYSCHOOLS
B¢dge[ -- Pro'ected--
Calendaz Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 207A. _ 2021
CAPACfIY SchoolYear 2015-16 201617 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020.21 2021-22
BiJII.DINGPROQ2AM
HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8;268 8;268 8,268 8,368 8,268 8;268 8,268
ETECAPACITY <. _ �_,._ . �,;_._�� 8,26$� 'i_8;2G8,_ !'8,2b8---8;26$ _8,268_ 8,26&:.. _$;26&--
Add or subtract changes in capacity
Ad'usted Pro ram Headcount Ca acit 8,268 8,268 8,268 8;268 8,268 $;268 8,268
�:._A3hsted'Pso`iam�kT&.: ac' ` �_: _.. _':.. ,. 8;258 "8,2C8 .;�8,268 . ..5,268 � 8;268� �S;�GS � ��,26$�.1
INROLLMN1�iT
— -- - — - — -- -
Basic FI'E Fniollmenf 9;269 9;322 9,400 9;497 9,56Z 9,694 9,763.
Intemet Acadeary(AAFTE)� (3� (3� (36 (3G) (36) (3� f4�
'_.Basic FCE Fi�ol�ient:viithout,in£erimeC Aca 9;233 ' 9;286 ', 9,364 ,9,461 `4,�3] i ,9;608 '.'9,727.
SURPLL6 0R(LINHOL6Ff� -
- - -__�R1�iQC�2?i141�.C�PAC'17T'::W. .�___ ,.' (9b5):. '(1,018 6F1� . ,1 } .' 7;263) .(1,34�):`(1>459)
� RIIACATABLECAPACITI�' �
. . . - - - -_ ...._ ..--- -..
(�irrerit Portable('apacity 1,000 1,150 1;150 1,150 1,150 1 150 1,150
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Addp"ortable capacity at Muror Lake and 1:50
Panther Lake �
_.,,Ad 'stedPortableCa ae' ; ' ` ' n.: � 1;130 1,150� '1,150; �;194 � �1;150"' 1,150� "�i;150�
----_ -
SURPLUS OR([RVHOL6FD) - — -----
PROQtAMAND RIIACATABLE
r ° � ,u CAP<ACI11' ". -: _ �4=__. __185�<e ai 132_�5.4,_—(43)-- � L90);= '�(309)�
...,s . n..a_ .
NOTFS:
1 Intemet Academy students aze includ8d in projeotions but do not require�full time dse of setiool facilities�.
2 Relocatable Capacity�is based on the number ofportables available and other.adimnistrative techniques which
can be.used to te�ornrily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated rtnmber only.
Theactua]number ofp"ortables that will be used will be based on ac[ual studeat population needs,
The DistricYmay begin to pull portables fromthe mstructional iuventory. Age and�condi[ion ofthe portables
will determine feasibility for continued instructional use.
25
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIESPLAN
_ .
CAPACITY SUMI�LARY-NImDLE SCHOOIS
Budget -- Pro'ected-- � � -�
CalendazYeaz 2016 . _2017 2018. _ 2019. __2020_ _ 2021 _ _ 2022_
CAPACfI'P SchoolYear 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 2020-21 3021-22
BUII,DINGPROCd2AM
FIFf�DCOUNT CAPACIT'P 5,133 5,133 5;133 5,133 5,133 5;133 5,133
�:FI'E.CA',P��1'CY�___�..:_ � _5,185 � S�?85_.�5;1$5, '_5;185' �57:`$5'�.i_Ss185__5185^
Add or subtract changes m capacity -
Ad'usted Pro Headcount Ca acit 5,133 5,133 5,133 5;133 :5,133 5;133 5,133
` �;Adu`stie�Pro:iamFi'E�Cz'aci� , "5,185' �;'3,�$5' ;'-3;1$3 _5;185; . `:S,ll85�, 5,185'. �;.S,f85�`�
INROLLIVII�NT
BasicFTEEnro]Iment 4,968 5,140 5,152 5;125 5,260 5;355 5,407
fnteinet Academy(AAFTE)� (74) (7A) (74) (74) (74) (74)� (74)
,,;Ba'sic;F?��dy�cnt:wrt#�out Irit�iiiiet,l�cacl�""', .4,894 � ; 5066:' ;'S478 S,tD51c 5,186,�, S;2S�.• :�;333',
_ _
_ SURPLUS OR(ONHOLLSID)
-. ` ,P=RQ�Rt,1�IC9PACTf1�'t- - -- _:... ._291.... ; 119�,.107.._: T,39 . �1 ::_ 9fi _ . 148 :
RII.00ATABLE CAPACITI�
�rienS Portable Ca'pacity 550 350 550 550 550 550 550
Add/Subtrnct portable�capacity
°�M " � tir , � ,s, �� r� r
�Ad'�is�Ab'ifi�bib_ acity_�.�:�._t�_"�550.�.�550_,_:;550_ � . SS4_ .550.:__ _ �0� _SSP)-_,
SURPLi�OR(UNHOL6FD)
PROGdtAMAND RIIACATABLE
�---k--:--CAPACIPY � _:° • ':;_ . 8Al:e� _669 �., C. 65Z• ' °.�fi8,4'. _<549": .454�.. !402�.
NOTFS:
1 Intemet Academy.students aze included in projections but do not.require.full tune use of school facilities.
2 Relocatable Capacity is based on tHe number of portables available arid oth"er administrative techpiques which
_ _
can:be used�to temporarily house students until pemyanent facilities are ayailable.This�is,a calculated numb.er�only.
Tfie actual number of portables thaTwill be used will be based onactual student population needs.
The District may begm fo pull portables fromtfie insiructional'myentory. Age�and conditioq ofthe:poitables
will detemrine feasbility for continued'mstructional use.
26
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACTI'Y SUMMARY-HIQI SCHOOLS
Budget -.- Pro'ected--
CalendarYear 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CAPACITY SchoolYeaz 301516 201617 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 3020.21 2021-22
BUILDINGPRO(7tAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACiTY 5;194 5;294 5,494 5,494 5,494 5,494 5;494
FTE CAPACII'Y. 5;662 _ _3,662__.5,862_. _5,862_ _5;862_ ;5.862, _:5,867
Add or subtract changes in capacity
Add caPacity to Fedenl W ay HS 200
Ad' sted Pro ram Headcount Ca acit 5,294 5,494 5,494 5;494 5,494 5,494 5,494
-- — - _ - — -
Ad'sted Pro rnmfTE� aci ' S;662_ 5,862_ _5 862_ _5;862---5,862 ..5,863— -5,862_
FNROLLMENT
BasicFf'EFnrollment 6,349 6,092 6,054 6,207 6,261 6,396 6;430
Internet Academy{AAFCE�� (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205)
__Basic.EdwitkoutIntemet,AcadB _._.._.�__ I 6;144 . 5,887 .! 5;849 6;002 - , 6;056 ,6,191 6;225_
SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSID)
___ . . ___.._EROQtAMCAPAC111', 4S2 (25). ;_ 13. (140 ._._(19_4)_ _329�:_363 -
RFLOCATABLE CAPACITI�
Cl�rrenfPortableCapacity 825 825 750 750 750 750 790
Add/Subtmct portable capacity
Subtnct portable capacity at Federal Way HS (75)
Ad' sted Poitable Ca'acrt � �� _ ,`-'825.i Z50___7i0_., _950 , , 230. 750 750
5URPLUS OR(I7NHOUSID)
PRO(�tAMAND RIIACATABLE
_____� . _ .. CAPACITY� 343 �725�_ _ 763__ �_ 610�__ :_556_ . 421� .387
NOTFS:
1. Intemet Academy students are included 'm projections but do not require full time use of sc600l facilities.
2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number ofportables available and other administrntive techniques which
can be used to temponrily house students until pemianent facilRies�are�.available.This is a calwlated number ortly.
T'he actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
The I)isirict may begin to pull portables fromthe instmctional inventory. Age and condition ofthe portables
will detemmie feasibility for continued instructional use.
3. Capacity for anhoused students will be accommodated wifh tnveling teachers and
no planning time in some classroo�.
27
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Kina Countv.the Ciri of Federal Wav, and the Citv of Kent Imnact Fee Calculations
Single and Mulri-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that impo.ses school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees
to heip cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school faciliUes.
To determine an equitable fee tlirongliout nnincorporate.d King Coun.ry, a formula was
establish�. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially
adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formiila requires the District to
establish a "Student Genecation Factor" which esrimates how many students will be
added to a school district by each new single or mulri-family unit and to gather some
standard construction costs, viluch aze unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined sepazately for
single-family units and multi-family units. The factors nsed in the2016 Capital Facilities
Plan weie derived nsing actual generation factors from single-family units that were
constructed in the last five(5)yeazs.
- IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation facto; is a copy of the Impact Eee
Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21 A and
the Growth Management Act.
➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last S
years.
Plan Year 1015 Plan Year 2016
Single Family Units $5,171 $2,899
Mu1ti-Family Units $1,834 $506
Miiced-Use Residential� $917 $253
City of Federal Way SF-85,171 SF-$2,899
MF-S1,834 MF-$506
� In accordanqe with the City of Federal Way CounciPs changes to Ordinance No. 95-
249,which authorizes the collection of school impact fees.
28
FEDERAI,WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES RLAN
� STUDFNT(�,'NERA T ION
NEW CONSTRUCI'ION IN PRIOR�S YFARS-
Single Family Student Generafion
Numberof Number of Number of Number of , Number of Elementary Middle School High School Tofal
Single Family Multi,Family Elementary Middle School High:School Student Student Student ' Student
DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Dwellin s Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor
(15) Swan Song 28 'S 4 3 0:2857 0.1429 0.1071 0.5357
(1¢)Wynstone:East 96 28 19 7 0.2917 0.1979 0.0729 ' 0.5625
(14) North Lake Rim 37 3 4 3 0.0811 0.1081 D.0811 i 0.2703
(14)Wynstone 43 13 5 2 0:3023 0.1163 0.0465 0.4651
(13)Saghalie Firs 34 11 3 , 4 0:3235 0.0882 0.1;176 0.5293'
(13)'l:ake:Point 22 5 3 t 0.2273 0.1364 0.0455 i 0.4092
(12}Ming Court 15 6 4 5 0:4000 0:266Z -0.3333 , 1.0000
(12)'Sunset Gardens 12 12 2 1 1:0000 0:1667 0.0833 I 12500
(1.1)Brighton�Park 27 10 4 ! 6 0!3704 0:1481 0:2222 ! , 0.7407
(1;1)The Greens 20 71 7 10 0:5500' 0.3500 0:5000 ; � 1.4000
Tofal 334 0 107 55 42
StudentGeneration' �" _ `"� vT�� = ; �_ "'�
* SiudenbGeneration rate;is based on totals.
Mu1ti-Family Student GeneraHon
Elementary Middle School .High School: Total
Aubum 0.065 0:038 0.022 0.724
Issaquah 0,156 0:051 0.049 0l256
Kent 0.1�17 0.022 0.039 0�177
Lake Washington � 0.062 0.016 i 0.014 0:092
Average: �-.'` ���=�Qr�3t--"��-=�'�'v_. _ �
29
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT P'FE
Sc600l Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student
Facility Cost/ Facility Facfor Factor CosU CosU
Ac:ea e Acre Ca 8cit 5FR MFR SFR MFR
Deu�entary 032Q4 0.0990 $0 $0
Middle School _ . - . . .. - _ .01647 _ _ . _—.0.0320 _ _ __ _$0_ ._. _.___ _.$O
I-Iigh School 4.85 $216,718 � 51 01257 0.0310 $2 588 � $638
TOTr1I; $2 SS $638
$chool Construction Cost: Student Student
%Pe�Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ CosU
Total S� Ft Cost Ca acit SFR MFR SFR MFT2
Eleauntary 94.76% .0:3204 0.0990 $0 .$0
Middle School 97.12% . 0:1647 _ .. 0.0320 _..._ . . .$0� �. _ . .$0
High School �96:65%� $13 780 000 200 0.1257 0.0310 $8;371 �� � -�$2,064
'io"rnL ,$8 71 $2 064
Temporary�Facility Cost: Student Student
%Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost7
Tota1�S Ft Cost Ca acit SFR MFR .SFR MFR
IIementary 5.47%0 $184,183 I50 0.3204 0.0990 $22 .$7
Middle School 2:75% 01647 �0.0320 $0. - �$0
Aigh School ` �- 335% -� �� - 0.1257 �.0.0310 �— � � ���-$0� �--� --- '$0
TOTAL. $22 $7
Smte Matching Credit Calculatlon: Student .Student
Congtruction Cost Sq.Ft State Factor Factor CosU Cos�
Allocation/S .Et __. .Student. __ ..Match . . . SFR. _, _ . .MFR_ ___. ._.:SFR._____ .. _.MF.
IIementary � $200.40 0:3204 �0.0990 - -$0: .
Middle School $200.40 01647 0.0320 $0 $0
High School . . �. $200:40 _ _ 130 . __64.73% . .0.125Z ..._ __..0.0310 .__.. ___$2�120: . . . .$523
� Total � $2120 � � $523
Taz Psyinent Ccedit Calculation SFR MFR
Avemge Assessed Value (Maich 2015) $25T,998 $99,030
Capital Bond Interest Rate(Mazch 2015) 3.68% 3.68%
Net Pcesent Value'ofAverage Dwelling � $2;126,332 -- -$816;172�
Yeazs Amortized 10 10
PropertyTarzLevyRate — :$1:44. _ __.$1.44. -
Present Value�ofReieuue Stream� $3 062 � $1�175�
Siugte Fari�ily Multi-Family
Residences Residences
NTtlgation Fee Surivnary
Site Acquisition Cost $2,588 $ 638
Pem�anent Facility Cost $8,391 $� 2,064
Temporary Facility Cost $22 $� 7
State Match Credit $ (2,120) $ (523)
TaYPaymentCredit $ (3,062) $ (1,175).
S.ubTotal $ 5,798 �$� 1,011
50%Local'5hare $ 2,899 $� 506
Calculated ct Fee $ 2 899 $ � �506
2016�Im ct Fee'. �� �- � � `$� � 2 899 $� J� � 506�
30
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 2016 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document,based on the 2015 Capital
Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2015 Plan and the 2016 Plan aze listed below.
SECTION I-THE CAPITt1L FACILITIES PLAN
SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forwazd to reflect 2016-2022 and adjusted for
anticipated Federal Way High School construction scHedule. The plan is found on page
9.
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every
elementary schooL Changes to ;he Building Program Cap'acities calculation aze found on
page 16.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new
portables purchased. Portable Locatious can be founii on page 19.
STUDENT FORECAST
T'he Student Forecast now covers 2016 through 2022 Enrollment history and projections
aze found on page 22.
CAPACTTY SUNIMARY
The changes in the Capacity Sunmiary are a reflection of the changes in the capaciries
and student forecast. New scho.ols and incieased capacity at current buildings are shown
as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries aze found on pages 2427.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION-KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The
adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation; causing a change in the Impact Fee
between the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2016 Capital Faciliries Ptan can be
found on page 32 and 33.
31
FEDERAL_WAY_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2015'TO 2016
.STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors.aze based on rates for new developments conshvcted overa
p"eriod of not more.tkian five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. T'he changes in
student Generation factors between the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2016 Capital
Facilities Plan aze dne to developments that were deleted or added based upon tha age of
the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet
is found on page 27.
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTIONCOSTS
The anticipafed cost based on 2013 estimate for replacing Federal Way High is
$106,000;000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The current capaciry of
Federal Way HiRh is 1538. The addition of 200 seats will increase capacity by 13%.
Total Cast $'106,0OO,ODO x.13=$I3,780,000
SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS
The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program
and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. 77ze purchase and use of this site
increased our high school capacity by 51 students.
TotatCost 82,700,000%2=$1,050,000
Cost per Acre $1,050,000/4.85=$116,718
The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2016 Capital Faciliries
Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary fiom yeaz to yeaz as programs aze
added or changed and conshuction cost may increase over time.
32
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2015 TO 2016
IMPACT FEE
Item FromLTo Comment
Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.23%to 95.10"/o Report#3 OSPI
Perc.ent Temporary Facilities 4.77%to 4.87% Updated portable inventory
Average Cost of Portable $183;020 to$184;183 Updated 5-yr rolling average of
Classroom portables purchased and placed in
2014
Construction Cost Allocation $200.40 to $200.40 Change effective.July 2014
State Match 66.10%to 64.73% Change effective July 2014
Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget$qpnd Educational
$214,952 to 5257,998 Service District (ESD 121)
IvIFR—
$88,900 to $99,030
Capital Bond Interest Rate 438%to 3.68% Market Rate
Property Ta�c Levy Rate $1.55 to$1.44 King County Treasury Division
Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory
Elementary .2818 to .3204
Middle School .1581 to.1647
High School .1856 to .1257
Mniti-Fanvly Student Yield Updated County-Wide Average
Element.ary .1920 to .0990 Note: The last district multi family
Middle.School .0570 to .0320 development, built in1008,generates
High Scho.ol .0680 to .0310 a higher srudent yield rhan fhe county-
wide average.
Impact Fee SFR—
$5,171 to $2,899 SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR.— MFR based on the updated calculation
$1,834 to $506
33
GLOBAL END
Each student will graduate with the skills and academic
knowledge to succeed as a responsible, contributing
member of a global society.
STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT
Each student at every grade level will perform at or above the
state or district standard in all disciplines. Each student's
progress shall be measured annually by academic growth.
RESPONSIBILITY
Each student will take responsib.ilify for their academic success;
exhibiting positive and ethical personal behaviors; treating
ot.hers with respeat; courtesy, and dignity.
PARENT ENGAGEMENT
Each student will benefit from the relationship each school will
establish with each parent, guardian or advocate.
� � �p�e�l ,A/a� Federal Way Public 5chools
� � `� 33330 8t"Avenue 5
� � Pub�ic Schools (Z53)9 5 20 Oashington 98003
This document is published by the Business Services Department of the federal Way Public Schools.lune 2015
� 33330-8"'AveS e�e C__1e�1 �A/,„�
Federal Wny WA 98003 roCGa ll�ay
� Pho�ie:(153J-945-2000 s � rV���C��I$
u�inr.fivns.ore
June 4, 2015
�
I Jeff Dixon
; Principal Planner
City Of Aubutn
25 West Main Street
j Auburn WA 98001-4998
i Deaz Mr. Dixon,
� Attached is a copy of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2016 Capital Facilities Plan. The
Federal Way Public ScHo.ols' Boazd of Education will be adopting this plan in July 2015.
, A copy of the resolution will be sent once theplan has been adopted.
' The expenditure report for the 2014 calendaz yeaz is also attached.
I
� The Federal Way Public Schools' Boazd of Education reguests the Ci.ty of Auburn to
i decrease the 2016 impact fee to $2,899 for each single-family development and decrease
! the impact fee to$506 for each multi-family development.
Sincerely,
���
Sally D. McLean
Superintendent
c: Board of Education
Tanya Nascimento, Student& Demographic Forecaster
Enclosure: 2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIG SCHOOLS
School Disfict No. 210 - lGng Gourrty
33330 - 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
RESOLUTION N0. 2015-14
A RESOLUTION of tl�e Board of Education of the Federal Way School
DisMct No. 210, to provide to the �ty of Auburn t9�e 2016 Capital
Facflitles Plan.
WHEREIIS, the Federal Way School District Board of Eduqtion hereby provides
to the City of Auburn the District's 2016 Capltal Facil�es Plan; documenting present and
future school facility requirements of the District, and
WHEREAS, the Plan corrtains all elements required by the Growth Nlanageinent
Act and City of Aubum Ordinance No. 5078, which addresses concurrency, allows each
school district to eskablish their own standards of service, and provfdes for future school
impact fees.
PtOW THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED that the Superintendent be authorized and
directed to submit the adopted 2016 Cap"�tal Facilitles Plan to the Gty of Auburri.
ADOPTED this 2Sth day of July, 2015,
Board Secretary p •
Di c�Eo�, _ _
_
r�,.
Dre r
Direcbor
Director
DETERNIINATION OE NONSIGNIFICANCE
Tssued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period
Description of Proposal`.
This threshold de2ermination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the "
following actions,which�e so closely related to each other that ihey aze in effect a single actidn:
1. The adoption of the Fedeial Way Public Schools' 2016 Six Year Capital Facilities
Plan by theFederal Way Public Schools for the purposes of plenning for the facilities needs of
the District
2. The amendment of the King County C.omprehensive Plan by King County to
include tlie Federal Way Publia Sckools'2016 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital
Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan.
3. The amendinent of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way,City of
Kent and tfie City of Auburn to include the Fedetal Way Public Schools' 2016 Capital Facilities
Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City ofFederal Way's, City of KenYs
and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan.
This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of
Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2016 Capitsl Facilities Plan into the
Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan.
Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools
Location of the Proposal:
The Federal Way Public Schools Distriot includes an azea of approximately 35 square
miles. .Afeas of the cities of Federal Way,Kent,Des Moines and Auburn fall within the District's
boundaries,as do parts of unincorporated King County.
Lead Agency:
Federal Way Publib Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926.
T'tie lead agency forthis proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a
probable siguficaat adverse environmental impact on the eavironment An environmental
impact statement(EIS)is not required nnder RC W 43.21 C;030(2)(c). This decision was made
after a review of t}ie completed envir6nmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This informarion is available to the public upon request.
Tlvs Deternvnation of Nonsigiuficance(DNS) is issued under Wf1C 197-11-340(2). The
lead agency ivill not act on this proposal for 14 days&om the date of issue. Comments must be
submitted by 4;30 p.m.;May 22;2015: The responsible official will reconsider theDNS based
on timelycomments aad may retain,modify,or,if significant ad4erse impacts:aze likely,
withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained,it will be final after the expiration of the comment
deadline. •
Responsible Official: Ms.Tanya Nascimento
Enrollment and Demographics
Federai Way Public Schools
Telephone: (253) 945-2071
Address: 33330 8th Avenne South
Federal Way WA 98003
Yo.0 may appeal this deteimination in writing by 430 p.m.,May 22,2015 to Tanya
Nascimento,Federal Way Public Schools, 33330 Sth A4enue South,Federai Way;WA 98003.
Date of Issue: May 8,2015
Date Publishedc Iviay 8,2015
2
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
WAC 197-I 1-960 Environmental Checklist.
Purp:ose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), ctiapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with pmbable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the envimxm�ent. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information w help ybu and the
agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts&om the propo.sal,if it can be
done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
Tlris environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are siguficant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions liriefly; with the most
precise information lrnown, or give the best description ybu can.
You must answer each guesdon accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases,you should be able to answer the yuestions&om your own observations oxprojeot plans without ttie
nced to lvte experts. If you really do not laiow the answei, or if a question does not apply to your
pioposal, write "do not l�ow" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid
unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask aboat governmental iegulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checkIist questions apply to all parts of your progosal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on different parcels of land: Attach any additional inforniation that will help describe
your proposaI or its environmental effects. The agency to wlrich you submit this checklist may ask yod to
explain your answers or provide additional infoimation reasonably related to determining if there may be
significaut adverse impact.
1 I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Use of cliecklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does
not apply"In addition,complete the Supplemenfal Sheet for nongroject actions (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"pmperty or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and"affected gebgraphic area,"respectively. "
2
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project,if applicsble:
The adop6on of a Six-Yeaz Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No:210 for
the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The ICing County,City of Federal VJay,
City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the
District's 2016 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element� This project may also
involva fhe azriendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the
DistricYs 2016 Capital Facilities Plan.
2. Name of applicant:
Federal Way School District No. 210. �
3. Address and phone nwnbet of applicant and contact person:
Federal Way School Dishict No. 210
33330 8th Avenue South
Federal Way WA 98003
(253)945-2000
Contact Person: Ms.Tanya Nasaimento
Enrollment and Demographics
T'elephone: (253)945-20'71
4. Date checklist prepared:
May 8, 2015
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Federal Way School Disizict No.210
6. Proposed tiaiing or soliedule(iucluding phasing,if applicable):
The Federal Way School DistricYs 2016 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the
District in June 2d15. T'he Capital Facilities Pian will be forwazded to King Couuty, the City nf
Federal Way, City of ICent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdiction's
Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in
this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities �
Plan annually. The projects included.in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to
project-specific environmental review.
7. Do you tiave aay plaus for fuiure additions, expansion, or fiuther activity related to or
connected with tlus proposal? If yes, explain.
3
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLTST
The Capital FaciliUes Plan sets forth the capital unprovement projects that the District is currenfly
implementing. This incli►des c6nstruction of Federal VJay HS. Additionally the plan covers the
pnrchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations: Current plans. are for all the
projects to be comglete by 2016 with athletic fields to be completed by 2017.
8. List any environniental informazion you lmow about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, diregtly related to this proposal.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review,
when appropriate,as tliey are developed.
9. Do you lmow whether applications aze pending for govemmental app;ovals of other
proposals directly affecting the propeity covered by your proposal? If yes,explain.
Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiotion for minor projects during the 2U16
calendar yeaz.
10. List any govemment approvals or pe;mits that will be needed for your pmposal,if known.
The District anticipates that King County,the City of Fedeial Way;the C.ity of Kent and the,city of
Aubum will aciopt this Capital Eacilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan. 1'he city of Des
lvIoines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their
, . Comprehensive Plans (when issued).
11: Give a brief, complete description of yow proposal, including the proposed nses and tlie
size of the projeot and site. Ttiere are several questions later in ttiis checklist thax ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
(Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on projact
description.)
This is a non-project action Tkus proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School
District's 2016 Capital Facilities Plan for the pwpose of planning the DisiricYs facilities needs.
'The DistricYs Capital FaciIities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal
Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensi4e Plans, It may also be
incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines, The projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review.
4
ENVIItUNMENTAL CHECKLIST
12. Location of the proposal. Crive sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township,
and range, if lmown. If a proposal would occur ovei a raage of area, pr6vide tfie range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topograplric map,
if reasonably available. VJhile you should submit any plans required by the agency, you aze not
required to duplicate-maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist
The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an
azea of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des
Moines and Auburn,parts of uninoorporated Kiag County, fall withiii the District's boundaries. A
detailed map ofthe DistricYs boundaries can be viewed atthe Dish�iaPs offices.
3
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
B. ENVIItONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes;mountainous,
other
The Federal VJay School Distdct is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and
gradienis. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at whigh the pzojects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan aie located have been or will be identified during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
b. VJhat is the steepest slope on tlie site(approxunate pe;cent siope)?
Specific slope characteristigs,at the sites of the projects inclutietl in the Capital Fagilities Plan
have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you lmow the classification of agricultucal soils, sp0cify tliem and note any prime
farmland.
Specifio soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Pacilifies Plan have
lieen or will be identified during project-level environmental review whenappropriate.
d. Are there surface indications or history of un�table soils in the immediate viciniry'? If so,
desoribe.
Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on
individual projeot sites haue Ueen or will be identified at the time of pmject-level environniental
review when appropriate.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantides of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate souroe of 511.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when
appropriate,to project-specifio-environmental review and locai approval a#the time of pmposal.
Froposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, qaaritity, and source of any fill
materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so,generally describe. �
It is possible that erosion coiild occur as a resuk of the construcfion pmjects cmrendy pLoposed
in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will
be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time ofproject-specific euvironmental review wNen
appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be sbbject to local approval processes.
6
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
g. About what percent of the site will be covei�ed with impervious surfaces atter project
conshuction(for example,asphalt or byildings?)
The proposed renovation projects will require the constrnction of impervious surfaces., The '
aattent of any impervioias cover coi�structed will vary with eaeh capital facilities pmject
included in the Capital Facilides Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed durnig projeot-
speeific environmental review when appropriate.
h. Prdposed measures to reduce or conirol erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any:
The erosion potential of the projects included in the Cajiital Facilifies Plan anii appropriate
control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review
when appropriate. Relevant eiosion reducflon and control requirements will be met.
2. Air
a. What types of einissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile,
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construcuon and when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quandties if lmown.
Various etnissions, many construction-relate.d;may result from the individual projects included
in the Capital Facilities Plap. The air-quality impaets of each projeot have been or will 6e
evaluated during pmject-specific environmental raviaw when appropriate. Elease see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b.. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your pioposal? If so,
generally describe.
Ariy off-site sonrces of emissions or odor thax may affect the individaal projects included in the
Capital Faciliries Plan have been or wili be addressed during project-specific envirbnmental
reyiew when appropriate.
c. Proposed measwes to reduce or control emissions or other impacts fo sir,if any:
The individual projects incluiiad in tHe Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to
project-specific environmenTal review when appropriaYe and relevant local approval processes.
The District will be required to ,compiy with all applicable air regulations anii air perriiit
requirements. Proposed mea§bres specific to the individual projects mcluded in the Capital
Facilities Plan hava been or will be addressed dpring project-specific enqii�onmentat rediew
when appiopriate. Please see the Supplemental Shee4 for Nonproject Actions.
�
ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECKLIST
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the unmediate vicinity of the site(incluiiing
yeaz-mund and seasonal streams, sattwater, lakes, ponds,wedands)? If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or:rivet it flows into.
There is a network of surFace water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The
_ ._
surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of tlie projects included in the
_ _
Gapital Facilides Plan have been or will be identafied during ptoject-sp:ecific environmental
review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface wate; ;egimes and flow pattems
liave been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual
projecYs.
2) Will the project reqnire any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? Ifyes,please describe and attach available plans.
The projects included in the Capital Fac'ilities Plan may require work near the surface
waters located witliin the Federal Way S.chool District.. Applicable local approval
requirements have been or will be satisfied.
3) Estimate the amount of fill ancl dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or weflands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate tlie source of fill material.
Information with respect to the placement or remdval of fill and dredge mate;ial as a
component of the projeofs included in the Gapital Faciliqes Plan has been or will be
piovided during pmjeot-specific environmental review when appropriate; Applioable loca!
regulations have been or will be satisfied.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description,purpose,and appm�cimate quantities if lrnown.
Any s�sface water withdcawals or diversions required in connection with the pmjects
included in flie Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during projeot-
specifie enyironmental review when appropriate.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodpiain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Each project 3ncluded in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain azea, vi+i116e
i�equired to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste m.aterials to sprface waters? If
so, describe the tyge of waste and anricipated volume of discharge.
8
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Specific information regarding the dischazge of waste materials that may be required as a
result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan lias been dr wiil be provided
during project-speciSc environmental review when apgropriate. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Groimd:
1) Will g;oundwater be withdrawn,or will water be dischazged to groundwater? Give
general description,purpose, and approximate quantiiies if lmown.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater
resources. T'he impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on
groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during pioject-specific enviroiiumental
review when apprbpriate. Each project is or wiil be subject to applicable local regulations.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonp;oject Actions.
2) Describe waste material that will be dischazged into the grouad from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to he served (if applicable), or the number of animais
or humans the system(s)are expected to serde..
The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects
included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environnierital
review.
c. Water Runoff(including stonn water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and
_. . _ _
disposal, if any(include qaaritities, if Irnown). Where will this water flow'?Will this water .
flow into other waters? If so,describe.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilides Plan may have storm water runoff
consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has
been or will be provided dtiu�ing project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
Each project is or will be subjecY to applicable local storm water regulations.
9
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECI{LIST
2) Could waste materials enter ground or s�sface waters? If so,generally describe.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the disc4iarge of waste
materials into ground or snrface waters. 'I1ie specific impacts of each project on ground
and snrface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmentai
review wfien appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations
regazding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, grouud, and ninoff water impacts,if any:
Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan haue been or will be addressed during pmject-specific envirbnmental
review wheaappropriate.
4. Plants:
a: Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other
_ evergreen tree;. fir,cedar,pine, other
stuubs
_ g'ass
P�'e
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabtiage,cjther
_ water plants: water lily,eelgiass,m'ilfoil,other
_ other types of vegetation
A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way$chool Disuict Inventories of
the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be deyeloped diaing project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or alte;ed?
Some of the proj�s included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require tlie removal or
alteration of vegetation. The specific impaots on vegetation of the pmjects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific envimnmental
review when appropriate.
e. List threateited or endangered species lrnown to be on or neaz the site.
The specific impacts to these sp�ies from the individual projects inoluded in the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific envnronmental review
when appropriate.
10
_
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
d. Proposed landscaping, use of nafive plans, or other measures to preserve oi enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Measures to preserve or enhance vegetarion at the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review
when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping
requiraments.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animais which have been observed on or neaz the site or aze known to
be on or neaz the site:
birds: hawk,heron,eagle, songbirds, other. __ . __
fnarrimals: deer, bear,elk,beaver;othe;:
Ssh: bass, salmon;trout,herring, shellfish,other:
An inventory of species that Ha4e been observed on or near the sites of�e projects proposed in
the Capital F'acilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental
review when appropriate:
b. List any tlireateiied or endangered species lmownto be on or near the site.
Inventories.of threatengd or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific
environmental review when apprdpriate.
c; Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.
The impacts of tfie projects incliided in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have
lieen or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any:
Appropriate measures to preserve ar enhance wildlife have been or will be detemuned duruig
project-specific environmenfal review when appropriate.
..
11
,_ . _.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a. What kinds of energy(elecriic,nadual gas, oil, wood stoye, solar)will be asgd to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether itwill be used for heating,manufacturing>
etc.
The State Boazd of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of a11 heating,
lighting, aiid iiisulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceeil. The
energy needs of the projects included in the .Capital Facilities Plan have bean or will be
determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solaz energy by adjaceiit propeities? ff so,
generalfy describe:
The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of
adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during projeot-specific envimiiaiental ieview
when appmpriate.
a VJhat Iduds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? I:ist
oflier proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any:
Energy conservation measures pmposbd in connection with the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan hav.e been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review
w&en appropriate.
7. Environmental Health:
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of
fire and explosion; sp,ill;or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal7 If so,
describe.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
2) Proposed measures fo reduce or conh�ol environmental health ha7ards,if any:
The piojects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all ciurent codes,
stanclards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have lieen or will be subject to '
project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed
when appropriate.
12
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECHI.IST
b. Noise:
1) What types of noise ezist in the azea which may afFect your project (for example: ,
traffic,equipment, operation, other)?
A variety of noises &om traffiq consiruction, residential, commercial and industrial areas
exists within the Feiieral Way School District The specific noise sources that may affect
the pmjects included in the C.apital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during
project-specific environmental review when appmpriate.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the pmject
on a stiort-term or a long-teim basis(for example: traftic, consm�ction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from thesite.
The District does not anficipate that the projects will create long-term inereases in tratT'ic-
related or operations-related noise levels.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any:
The projected noise impacts of the projects inoluded in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when
apprbpriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. What is the cuirent use of the site and adjacent properties?
T'here are a variety of land usas within the Federal Way School District, including residential,
commercial,industrial,institutional,utility,open space,recrearional, etc.
b. Has the site been used for agricultpre? If so, describe.
The project sites covered uuder the Capital Facili}ies Plan have not been used recenfly for
agriculture.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The struchues located on the proposed sit� for the projects includeii in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be identified and described duriag project-specifiaenvironmental review
when appiupriate.
13
ENVIRUNMENTAL CHECKLIST
d. Will any stnictures be demolished? If so,what7
Tlie remodeling and renovation projecu will require the demolishment of sobool structures.The
structia�es that will be demolished as a result of tlie projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be identified duriug project-spacific environmental review when
aPP�Pnate.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
1'he sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a vaziety of zoning
classi5cations under the appGcable zoning codes. Site-specific zonino iiiformation has been or
will be identified during project-speoific envitonmental reyiew when approp;iate.
f. W6at is the c.urrent comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Tnventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plaa have been or will be completed during pmject-specific environmental
review when appropriate.
g. Ifapplicable;what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the pzojects included 'in tYie Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be identified diuu►g pioject-specific enyironmental review
when appropriate.
h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" azea? If so,
specify.
Any environmentally sen§itive areas located on the sites of the pmjects included in the Plan
have been or will be identified during pmject-specific environmental revibw.,
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
T'he Federal Way School District currenfly serves approximately 22,200 scudents. The student
population is expected to increase to 23,000 by the year 20_22. This projection has been
adjusted to reflect the odrrent economic conditions. 'I'he District employs appmximately 3,200
people.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has
been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained
therei.n,will displace any people.
14
ENVII20NMENTAL CHECKI:IST
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:
Individual projects inciuded in the Capital Faciliries Plan will be subject to project=specific
environmental zeview and local approval when agpiopriate. Proposed mitigating meas�es viill
be proposed at that rime,if necessary.
1. Proposed measpres to ensure the pmposat is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans;if any:
The compatibility of the specific projects included 'm the Capital Facilities Plan with existing
uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the oomprehensive planning process and
dutingproject-specific environmental review when appropriate.
9. Housing:
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether lugh;middle;
or low-income housing.
No housing units would be provided in connection with tlie completion of the projects included
in the Capital Facilifies Plan. •
b: Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle,or low-income housing.
It is not antioipated ttiat the prqjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any
hoiuing units. T'he impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Ptan on ezisting -
housing haye been or will be evaluated during project-spacific environmental reyiew when '
appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or conlrol housing impacts,if any;
Ivleasures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects 3ncluded in the
Capital Faoilifies Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmantal
review when appropriate:
10. Aesthetics:
a: What is the tallest height of any proposed strucriire(s}, not inciuding antennas; what is the
prinoipal exterior bnilding material(s)proposed?
The aes.thetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faoilities Plan have been bi will lie
addressed during project-specific environmental review wtien appropriafe.
15
ENVII20NMENTAL CHECKLIST
b. What views�n the immediat8 vicinity would be:altered or obstructed?
The aesthetio impacts of the projects included in the:Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be
deternvned during project-specific envii�onriiental review wtien appropriate:
c. Proposed measnres to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:
Appropriate.measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the
Capital Fabilities Plan have been or will be detertnined on a project-specific basis when
appropriate.
I 1. Light and Glare:
a What type of light or glaze will the proposal produce? What time af day would ix rimainly
occur?
The light or glate unpacts of the projeqts included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or
wiIl be.addressed during project-specific environmental review.
b: Could light or glaze from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfei�e:with yigws?
The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or
will be addressed during-project-specific environmental review whenappropriate.
a WHat existing off-site sources of light or glare may afFect your p;oposal?
Off-site sources of light or glare that may a£fect the pmjects included.in tlie Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be evaltiated during project-sp"ecific environmental review when
appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:
Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed diaring
project-specific environmental review when appropriate.
12.. Recreation:
a What designated and informal recreational opportwuties aze in the immediate vicinity?
There are a variety of forn�al and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School
District
16
ENVII20NMENTAL CHECKLIST
b. Wouid ttte prbposad projeet displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe.
The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will
be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects
included in the Capital Facilities Elan, including proposed renovated schooi and support
facilities,may enhance recreational opportunities and uses.
c. Proposed measures to redtice or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
oppdrtunities to be provided by the project or applicant;if any:
Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or
will be subject to mitigation dnriag project-specific environmental.review when appropriate. A
school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields
and gytnvasiums.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers Imown to ba oa or next to tlie site? If so, generally describe.
There are no Imown places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the
projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resow�ces
on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail dwing project-specific
environmental review when appropriate.
b. Generally descn�be any Iandmarks or evidence of lristoric, archaeological, sciantific, or
cultural importance l�own to be on or next to the site.
An inventory of historical sites at or neaz the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan has been or will be developed dnring project-specific enyironmental review
when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacu, if any:
Appropriate measures have been or wiil be proposed on a project-specific basis when
appropriate.
14. Transportation:
a Idenrify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system.Show on site plans,if any.
The impact on public streets and higtiways of the individual projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan has been or wi11 be addressed during project-specific environmental review when
appropriate.
17
i
ENVIROIVIVIENTAL CHEGKLI$T
b. Is site cwTently sgrved by public transit? Lf not, what is the approximate disrance to the
nea;est transit stop?
The relationslup between the specific projects included in the Capital Faoilities Plan and public
transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental. review when
" appropriate.
a How many parking spaces would the completed projeot have? How many would the
project eliminate?
An inventory of pazking spaces Located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on pazking availaliility has been or will be
conducted during pmject-specific environmental revieviw when appropriate.
d. Will the proposal reqnire any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
sh�eets,aot including driveways7 If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).. �.
The need for new sh�eets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or
will be addressed during project-specifio-environmental review when appropriate.
e. VJill the project pse(or occur in the immediate vicinity o�water,rail,or air tiansportation?
If so,gene=ally describe.
Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been oz will be addressed during project-specific
envuonmental review when appropriate.
f. How many vehiculac trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,
indicate whea peak voluines would occur.
The ha�c impacts of the projects included in the Capital Fagilities Plan have been or will lie •
addressed during project-speoific environmental review when appropriate.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any:
The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific enyironmentai review when
appropriate.
I5. Public Services:
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for eacample: fire
protection,police protection,health care,seHools,other)? If so,generally describe.
The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will •
substaritially inorease the need for other publiaservices.
b. Proposed measiues to reduce or control direct impacts on public seryices,if any.
18 i
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic securiry systems, fire
alarms, smoke alarms,heat sensors, and sprinklersystems.
16. Utilities:
a. Circle utilities cuttently available at the site: electricity, nattival gas, water, refuse service,
telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system;other. ,
Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilitigs are
available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities
available at specific pmject sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-
specific environmental review when appropriate.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project;the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which ariglit be
needed.
Utility revisions and construction nceds have been or will be identified during pmject-specific
environmental review when appmpriate.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my i�owledge. I understand fl�ai the lead
agency is relying them to make its decision.
Signariire:
Date Submitte : May 8,2015
19
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
D. SUPPLEIvIENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this shaet for project actions)
Because these guestions are very general, it may be helpfiil to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment
When answering these questions, be aware of the e�ent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result &om the proposal;would affect the item at a greatei intensiry or at a faster rate than if the
proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the pmposal be likely to increase dischatge to water; emissions to sir;
production, storage;or release of toxic or ha7ardous substances; or production of noise?
To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be .
constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environaiental impacts will be more
likely. Additional impermeable surfaces,such as mofs, parldng lots, sidewalks, access roads,
and playgrounds could increase sto=m water rwioff,which could enter surface or ground waters.
Heating systems,em6rgency generators,and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to
the Capital Facilities Plan couid result in air emissions. The piojeots included in the Capital
Facilities Plan should not require the produotidn, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous
substances, with ihe possible exception of the storage of diesel fue!or gasoline for emergency
generating equipmerit. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the producrion
of noise &om its facilities, although �e projects included in the Gapitat Facifities Plan will
inciease the District's shuient capacities.
Proposed measures to avoid or redube such increases are:
Ptoposed measutes to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be
addressed during projeet-specific environmental review when appropriate. Storm water
detention and nirioff will meei applicable County and/or Ciry requirements and may besubject
to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements.
Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuei oil will be stored
inaccordance with local and state requirements.
2. How would the proposal be h7cely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life?
The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment
These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail dnring project-specific
enViroriinental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to
generate severe unpacts on fish or marine life.
,
Zp
_ _ . ._
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or mazine life are:
Speoific measures to piotect and conserve plants, animals; and fish cannot be identified at this
time. Specific mitigation pmpo.sals have been or will be identified, however, during project-
specific environmental review when appropriate.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natiu al resources?
The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the
consumption of energy.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and nahual resources are:
The projects included in the Capital Pacilities Plan will be constr¢cted in accordance with
applicable energy efficiency standazt3s.
4. How would the pmposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated(or eligible or under study)for govemmental protection; such as pazks,wilderness,wild
and scenic rivers, threatened or endaa�ered species habitat, historic or cultural sites; we8ands,
floodplains, or prime faimlands?
The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should haVe no impact Qn
these resources.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts aze:
Appropriate measures have been or will be propbsed during proj�t-specific environmental
review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan wil! be coordinated with King Gounty and the
ciries of Federal Way, Kent, Des 1Vloines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act
pmcess, one of ihe purposes of wluch is to protect environmentally sensidve azeas. To the
extent the District's faciliries planning process is part of the overall gowth management
planning process,these resources are more likely to be protected.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline i�se, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with e�cisting plans?
The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any irnpact on land or shoreline use that is
incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land nse codes, or shoreline management
plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained
therein will direcdy affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce ghoreline and land use impacts are:
No measwes to avoid or redube land use impacts resulting from tlie Capital Facilities P.lan or
the projects contained therein aze proposecl at this time.
21
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST
6. How wonld the proposal be likely to increase damands on traz�sportation or public services
and utilities?
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create tempoiary increases in the
DistricYs need for public services and utilities. Upoa the completion of the pmjects included in
the Capital Fagilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public
services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels.
Proposed measiues to reduge or respond to such demand(s)are:
No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time.
7. Ideritify, if possible, whether the proposa!may coaflict with local, state, or federal lauvs or
requirements for the p;otection of the environment.
The Capital Facilities Plau will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of
the environment.
22 '
POLICY & TEXT AMEfVDMENT (PT #4)
INCORPORATE KEfVT SCHOOL DISTRICT #415
2015/2016 - 2020/2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
� � �
, � , � � , ,
�
� _ .s : __ � ' � .,� _ _r
�: �, �
, {�
i- _ � ? �
... }�� . � f . � ..i ., � i � _ _.� � ._.._.�
_. � . .... _.
i
��15�-��1� - 20�Q}-����
��.�
�
�;�;�*
��_�
��
�
r ` TM
«
�s�
� :: �e ,
�� .
� ���
',�� ,:' x���
�- ��
� A `�
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
9u� 2ols
3 , 1 � �l , � ,
� � _� �- � � ` a � � �� - ��
,
: ;
� _ � � , ..� �' ? � ._� `_.� � _ 1 � � ',
SIX - Y�AR CAPIT�4L �AC1�1�9�S P�N
2015-2016 � 2020-2021
June 20'B5
I(ent School District No. 415
12033 SE 256'"Street
Kent,Washington 98030-6643
(253)37&7295
I��N?
,�HUu?
��]S'aRIG7
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Karen DeBruler, Presiderrt
Ms. Deborah Straus, Vce President
Ms:Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative
Mr. Russ Hanscom, Director
Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Director
ADMIPIISTRATION
Dr. Calvin J. Watts
Superintendent of Schools
Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer
Ralph Fortunato, CSBS, Director of Fiscal Services
Fred Long, Director of Facili#ies Services
Kent Sehbol District Six-Yeer Capitai Fedl'ities Plan June 2075 '�.
� �� �
� �' - ; �
� � � ' k F � , �
;
__i .l _ _? . _ � J �` _� ._! J> .) _' _ _� .� __ �
S�2'ear CapitaC�Facil'ities �'lan
7a61e of Conterits
Section Page Number
I Executive Summary 2
I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4
I I I District Standard of Service 9
I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schoois 12
V Six-Year Planning & Construction Plan—Site Map 15
V I Portabie Classrooms 18
V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19
V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24
I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 32
X Appendixes 33
Kant School Distric!SUc•Year Cepital Facilitlas Pian June 2015
I Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Faciiities Pian {the "Pfan'� has been prepared by the Kent
School DisUict (the "DisVict") as the organization's cap'ihal faalities pfanning
document, in compliance writh the requiremerrts of Washington's GroHRh
Managemerrt Act, King County Code K.C.G 21A.43 and Cities of Kent,
CoVington, Renton, Aubum, Biadc Diamond, Maple Vailey, and SeaTac. This
annual Plan update was prepared using data availabie in the spring of 2015 for
the 2014-2015 schoot year.
This Plan is consis#errt with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent Schooi District This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning documerrt
for all of the DistricYs needs. The Distnct may prepare interim and periodic L.ong
Range Capital Facilities Plans con&isteot witii Board Policies,taking iMo accourrt
a longer or shorter time period, crther factors and trends in the use of facil'dies,
and other needs of the District as may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted 6y
Metropolitan King County Counai and Cities of KeM, Covington, Auburn and
Renton and included in the Cap'dal Facilfties Plan elemeM of the CompPehensiye
_ .
Pians of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submittsd to cities of Black
Diamond, Maple Vailey, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their
Comprehensive Plans.
In order for impact fees to be coliected in the unincorporated areas of Kent
School Distrid, the Metropolitan King County Counal must adopt this Plan and a
fee-implementing ordinance for the DistPict. For impact fees to be collecfed in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Ker�t, Covington, Renton and
Aubum must also adopt thia Pian and their own school impact fee ordinances.
This Capital Facilities Plan estabiishes a stanclard of service in order to ascertain
c.uRent and future capacity. While the State Superirttendertt of Public Instrucfion
establishes square footage guide6nes for cepac�ty, fhose guide{ines do not
axount for local program needs in the District The Growth Managemerrt Act,
King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make
adjustrnents to the standard of senrics based on specific needs for stuiients of
the District.
This Plan inGudes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
Program capacity is based on an ayerage capaciiy and updated to reflect
changes to speaal programs served in each building. Portablea in the capacity
calculation use the same standard of service as the permanerrt facilities.
. tcominuea)
Kent SM.00l Dmhkt Six-Year Capttel Fecllitles Plan Juna 2015 Pege 2
I Exocutive Summary ��ww�
The capacity of each school in the Distrid is caloulated based on the District
standard of senrice and the existing inverrtory of permanent faciliEies. The
DistricYs program capaaty of permanent faalities reflects program changes and
the state's mandated redudtion of Gass size to meet the standard of service for
Kerrt School District Portables provide a.dditional transitional capacity.
Kent Schooi District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is
electronicelly reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public
instruction ("OSPI'� on Fortn P-223. Atthough funding epp.ortionmeM is based on
Mnual Rverage Full Time EquNalent (AAFTE), enroliment on October 1 is a
widely recbgnized "snapshot in time' that is used to report the District's
enroliment for the
year as reported to OSPI.
The Board of Diredors approved Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK'� for all
Elementary Schools in 2011-12 and FdK projections are used to forecast
Kindergarten enroilmerrt in future years.
The District reoeived authorization from the Offi� of Superintendent of Public
instruction to temporariN re�open the fomier Kent Elemer�ry School at 317
Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and
early chiid education classes for both Kent and Plsely-0'Brien Elementary
Schools to alieviafie overcxowding at those schoots. This building re-opened in fail
2014 as the KeM Valley Early Leaming CeMer.
The Districf's standard of senrice, enroilmeM history and projections, and use of
transitional facil'rties are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The
Distrid pians to corrtinue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the
transi4ional use of portsbles.
A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's
ability to implement this Plan. Pursuarrt to the requirements of the Growth
Managemerrt Act, this Ptan vui11 be updabed annually with changes in Uie impact
fee schedules adjusted axordingly.
Kent School Diatrkt Sbo-Ysar Capkal Fadl�as Plen Jurre 2015 Page 3
I t Six-Year Enrollment Project9on
For capital facilities planning, enrollmer►t growth projections are based on cohort
sunrival and studerrt yield irom documented nesiderrtial canstrucfion projected
over the next six years. r�e rmue z a�e�The student generation factor is the basis
for the growth projec6ons from new developments. cse.��
King County live births and the DistricYs relational peroerrtage ayerage were used
to detertnine the number of kindergaRners entering tfie system. �see reere �,ae� �
8.98% of 24,514 King CouMy live birtlis in 2010 is projected for 2,202 students
e�ected in Kindergarten for Odober 1, 2015. This is an decrease of 543 live
births in IGng County over fhe previous year. �s�r.aa z a��
Full Day Kmdergarten ("FDK7 programs at all 28 elementary schools require an
adjustment to ths Kindergarten forecast for projecting FDK at 1.0 FTE for capital
facilities planning. P-223 Reports will continue to include FDK students at 1.� for
twelve schools with FDK funded by state apportionmerrt, and atl other
kindergarten siuderits will be reported at .50 FfE for state funding in 20142015.
Early Childhood Education students (also ideritified as °ECE7, °Preschoat
Inclusive Education ("IE' students are farecast and reported to OSPI separately
on Form P-223H for Special Educetion Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve
students in fhe ECE programs at elementary schools.
The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 2-3% larger than
the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the DisUict from
private kindergartens. Cohort sunrival method uses historical enrollmer�t data to
forecast the number of studeMs projected for the folEowing year. Projectio�s for
October 1, 2015-2020 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected
Enrollmenffi.
Within pradical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developmerrts.
The District will corrtinue to track new development activity to determine impact ta
schools. Infortnation on new reside�tial developments and the compleUon of
these proposed developmenLs in all jurisdictions will be considered in the
DistricYs future anatysis of growth projections.
The Kent School DisVict serves eight pertnitting jurisdictions: unincorporated
King County, 4he cities of Kent, Covingtan, Renton, and Auburn and smaller
portions of the cRies of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley
tcontir�ue�
KaM School Obtrlct Slx-Year C�I faUOtles Plen June 2015 Page 4
I I Six-Year Enrollment Projectlon �c�,m,,,«r�
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
'`Student Factor" is defined by King CouMy oode as "tl�e number derived by a
school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected
to be generated by a dwellirSg uniY' based on district records of average actua!
studerit generated rates for developmerrts completed within the last ten years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for KeM School DisVict is
asfoltows:
Single Family Elementary .257
Middle School .070
Senior High .13@
Total .465
Multi-Family Elementery .111
Niiddle School A22
Senior High .039
Total .�72
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,867 eingle family
d4ireiling units and 966 multi-family dwelling units with no adjuatmerrt for
occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pege 36 of the Capital Faalities
Plan for details of the Student Generadon Factor survey.
in preparing the 2015-201B to 2020-2021 Capital Facilities Plan the District
contrected with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside Califomia,
a noted e�qiert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze end
prepa�e the student generation fador. DDP used a la(ger sample of single family
residenees than the district did in previous pians and inctuded both "garden" and
"urbah style"apartmerits in the calculation for mulfi-family residenc�s.
Urban style apartmerrts typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrahce,
elevator access to alf floors and have a oentral ooriidor with apartmerrts on �ch
side. These .apartmerrts have little or no surFace street p.arking, with parking
located beneath the building, retail may or may not be induded with the building.
If theie is retail it will generalfy be located on the first floor. These apartmenis
seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children.
rc���
KeM School District 31x-Year Capkal Fae0ltles PWn Juna 2015 Page 5
I I Six-Year Enrollmeort Projection �c�rs,,,ea�
Garden style apartrnerrts will have very I'rttle studio apartrnerits and wiil have
more three bedroom apartrner�ts then the urban style and in theory gene[ate
more students enrolled in s�ooi. The.se apartments will aiso have lar9ns, dub
houses, swimming poois and places for chitdren to play.
The District feR that it is important to inGude both stytes of apartments for the
student generetion factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come
from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be
induded in mix of mufti-family housing units.
Kerrt Sc�ool Dlstrk�Six-Year Capital Fealitias Plan Juna 201$ Paga 8
i
i
KENT 3CHOOL D15TRICT Pla 415 I
OCTOBER REPORT 1251H(HEADCOUIdT).ENROLLAflEtdT H18TORY
�e=uvemreu ie�niew teas000.�e„zoo, �e�nzam i.emanro iemzaa i.ehxooa�emmos�eMsom ummoe
o�erHCEmdm�rn 20pb :2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2071 2012 2013 2014
�a�nr t�e e�a' rl„ee� z1,na zi,e�f zz,ea� n,a�a z2,eeo 24$M ss,aee 25,222 25,05T
i�aaae�oea.ma .�eo aae ea sea u3 -fss t.sea ass 92s -te5
K��/�%' 8.41% 8.2396 8.3095 8.47% 8.33% 8.13% 8.18% 6.6746 8.40% 8:34%
� Id11dB�g8ttCn 1892 1793 1815 1�1 1906 1846 7883 2134 2118 20�
G�ad6 7 1,939 2009 7878 7923 1961 1886 7888 2077 2188 2127
Grdde 2 1.866 2001 2051 1918 7966 1842. 2016 1905 2055 2190
C�fedE 3 1.�7 2Q31 2038 2087 1977 2W2� 1963 2062 1922 2070 �
Qade 4 2,031 2017 2052 2088 2p62 1�58 2024 2000 2087 7B�'.�8 '
C�tedC 5 2,�'7 2057 2023 2050� 2091 2088� 1974 2044 2008 2118
Gtede 6 2,173 2108 2109 2p82� 2076 2136 2135 2026 2078 2023 �
GIBde 7 �saea 2,208 2208 2138 27Y2 2117 2095 2705 2139 2048 21D4
Catade 8 " " 2,297 ?257 278b 2148� 2173 2163 2117 2139 2121 2081 �
Grade 9-Sarourtiph 2.774 2782 2584 2578 2472 2440 2471 2455 2483 2428
G�ede 10 2.779 2218 2481 2248 2217 T238 2272 2092� 2046 2151 �
C�rade 11 � 7,870 188'1 1982 2059 2048 2048 1985 7933 1873 1802
Calade 12 7,560 1665 1578 1848 1712 1884 ' 1858 1848 1639 /676
TdelEmdlmmd' 29,970 28,998 28,882 28,631 28,784 28,830� 26.815 28,812� 28,684 28,724 �
Yemly HBHdmuM
k�BaelDrorea60 �42 28 -114 �1 -87 .131 -16 -3 �IB 180 �
Cu�wlafwe 4Mreaae M2 4B8 334� 30;i 238 102 B7 84 SB 798 �.
1 TNs num6er 4�cates ec1uY d�8u hf IOnO�b'3 Yeme V�brto emdhnent yeet��dated by W�h6gron Stete Depaitmenl M '�.
Healtl��Centar for tleeNh Smtlslkx:Kmt Sd�od ds6W pm�bes�on achrel FOnderpe�n e�ao9merA 6 Yeen let�. . .
2 Enrd6nmt reportedlo tlie cNEe m Fam P-2xi pe�relee besk e&�a1Wn f�nMlnB m�d e�mkdes EaAY Cl�hoo0 Educatbn
('ECP 8 B2'a B6Bi fn 2 Pre�ool hbuNNB EduCeBon)m�0.ao9eBaari�'Rumiqq Slelt eWdent6. �.
�n scroa omma su�-ve�cm�F�� Table 1 Ju�e 2015 r��
I�NT SCHOOL OISTRICT No.415
_
SDC-YEAR ENROI.i.PtJENT PRWECTION
Fuil!>ayKinde rEenffieAF_Idn LBh�7D08 L8b�2009 LBN2070 LBin2Dt1 lBIn2012. 18F9.YDt3 �LBEst2qt4
-� -- - . ... :. :-ntrua� P::__. R , . _:O":. J-_:__E' "Ci_:_.::`T -1-�: O' �:`.:�N. ..
�:" , .:. . �:... �` . . .
p��r 2014 2015 2018 2017 2U1$ 2019 2U20
fGng County Live Births' 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 25,880 28,490 26,999 '
InueaselDwease 97d -543 1�8 402 858 BW 5Q8
IGnde�gerten/Birth% Z 8.34% 8.98% 9.16% 923% 9.13% 9.13% 9.16%
FQ�ndergarten(�1.D 2090 2,202 2,258 2,310 2,364 2,419 2,473
Grade 1 2127 2,139 2,253 2,309 2,364 2,419 2,475
C,rede 2 2190 2,140 2,152 2,266 2,323 2,378 2,433
Grade 3 2070 2,229 2,178 2,190 2,3� 2,364 2,420
Grada 4 1956 2,082 2,241 2,190 2,202 2,319 2,377
Grade 5 2116 1,977 2,104 2,265 2,213 2,225 2,343
Grade 6 2023 2,155 2,015 2,144 2,308 2,255 2,2$7
Grade 7 2104 2,030 2,'163 2,022 2,152 2,317 2,263
Gradfl 8 2091 2.127 2,052 2,186 2,044 2,175 2,342
Grade 9 2428 2,401 2,442 2,356 2,510 2,347 2,497
Grade 10 2151 2,129 2,104 2,140 2,085 2,200 2,057
Grade 11 1802 1,911 1,691 1,869 1,801 1,835 1,954
Grade 12 1576 1,478 1,567 1,551 1,533 1,559 1,505
Total EnrollmeM Projedton' 26,724 27,000 27,418 27,798 28,286 28,812 29,406
YearlylncreaeelDeCrease ' 276 a18 380 487 627 59a
Yearly IncreeadDecreeee% 1.03°h 1.55% 1.38% 1.76% 1.88% 2.�8%
Total Eniollment Pro'ection 26 724 27,000 27,418 Z7,798 28 285 28,812 29 406
--- __._- -..______. __- --- .__.___
� Itlndetparton enrollmeM proJeIXlon for 2016 le beaeC on KeM S�percentege of IWe bUUm in Kln9 Cou�tty tive yeare prevlous.
2 Kindergerten projecUon is calwlated by usin8lhe DIsMd's previous year parcentage of IOng Camty biAhs flva years earlier
compaied W acNal kindergarEan enrollmont in Me prevbus year.(Excludes ECE•Eerly ChiWhood EduceGon preachooiere)
� Headcaunt ProJectlons Tor 2075-2020 Lom OSPI Report 1049-Detertnination of Prqected EmollmeMa
° Oet.2014 P223 HeadcouFrt is�,724&F7E 25,888.84.Full Headcoufrt wllh ECE Presehool8 Running StaR atudeMs=28,090
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Ad ustments for current aconomic factors
For facilities pla�ning puryoses,this six-year enrollment projection arrticipates conservetive enrallment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the disMct.
Kent Sehod Dlatrkt Six-Yaer Capital Facilitiee Plen T8��8 a Jwe 2015 Paga 8
III Current Kent Sahool District "St�ndard of Service'°
In order to de�ermine the capacity of facififies in a school district, King County
Code 21A.06 referenoes a "stantlard of seivice" that each school district must
establish in orcier to asce�tain its overall capacity. The sfandard of se►vice
identifies the program year, ttre dase size, the number of classrooms, students
and programs of speciai need, and other factors detertnined by the district which
wouid best serve the studerrt population.
This Plan indudes the standard of service as establishetl by Kent School District.
The District has identified schoois writh significant special needs programs as
"impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those
faci�ides. Portables inGuded in the capacity caiculation use the same standard of
senrice as the permanerrt fecilities. (see Appendoc A, e B c)
The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent
School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined
with review of changas to capacity and standard of senrice. This process wi11
affeet various aspects of fhe DistricYs standard of service and future changes will
be reflected in future capital facil'fies plens.
Current Sffindards of Servioe for Elemerdarv Studerrts
Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 1-3 is planned for an averqqe of 23 or fewer students.
Ciass size for grades 4-8 is planned for an average ot 27 or fewer students.
Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1 and 2, for schools that qualiy for high
poverty funding (18 elementary schools for 2015-18) is ptanned for an average of
20 or fewer students.
Ail elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten
programs (FDK = Fuli Day Kindergarten) with the second half of the day funded
by state apportionment or the Edu.cational Programs and Opetations Levy.
Twelve schools with FDK Progferims have state apportionmerrt funding.
Some special programa require specialized classroom apace and the program
capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some
students, for e�cample, leaye their regular classroom for a short period of time to
receive instruction in special prog'ams and space must be allocated to senre
these programs.
Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be
provided music instruction and physicai education in a separate c.lassroom or
faciliry.
Kent SchOW DlaNict Sbc-Year Capflal FedlBlea Plen June 2015 Pepa 9
Some ideritified studerrts will also be pronided educational opportunities in
ciassrooms for speciai programs such as those designafied asfoliows:
English Language L�mers (E L L)
Education for Disadvantaged Students(T�le n—Federal Program
Leaming Assisted Programs(LAP)—State Program
HighlyCapable Studerrts-State Program
Reading, NAath or Science Labs
Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools
Inciusive Education Seryiqe for Elementary and Secondary students with
disabii'ities may be provided in a separate or self�contained classroom sometimes
with a capacity of 10-95 depending on the program:
Early Childhood Education (ECE)-3-4 yr. old studerrts with disabilities
Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Cer►ter Programs
Integrated Programs& Resourc� Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Seff-contained Indusive Education Support Center ProgPams (SC)
School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (5A)
Adaptive 5upport Center for AAild, Moderate &Severe Disabil'�ies(aSGDD)
Speech &Language Therapy& Programs for Hearing Impaired students
Oawpational& Physical Therapy Prog[ams (OT/P77
The Outreach Program (TOP)for 18-21 year old secondary studer�ts
Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these
programs; some older buildings have been madified, and in some circumstances,
these modiFicatians reduce the classroom capacity+ of the buildings. HVhen
programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program
and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondarv Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only 4hose programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the
capacity of the school buildings.
Class size for grades 7—8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students.
Class size fnr grades 9- 12 is planned for an average of 30.&or fewer students.
Similar to Inclusive Education Programs iisted above, many other secondary
programs require speciaiized classroom space which can reduce the program
capacity of the permanent school buildings.
Kent Schaul DlstriG Siu-Yaer Capital Facilltias Plan June 20�S Page 10
ider►tified secondary students will also be provided other educational
opportunities in dassrooms for programs designated as foilows:
Computer, Mut6-Media&Technology Labs&Programs
Technology Academy at Kerrt-Meridian High S�oot&Mill Creek Middle School
Science Programs & Labs — Biology, C.hemis6y, Physics, Oceanography,
Astronomy, Meteorology,Marine Bio.iogy, Genera!Science, etc.
English Language Leamers (E L l.)
Music Progrems—Bantl,Orchestra, Chorus, Jaa Band, etc.
Art Programs—PainUng, Deslgn, Drawing, Ceramica, Pottery, Photogrephy, etc.
Theater Arts—Drame, Stage Tech,etc.
Jaumalism and Yearbook Ciasses
Highly Capabie (Honors or G'rf� and Advanced Piacemerd Programs
Intemational Baccalaureate(°I B")Program
JROTC-Junior Reserve Offioers Training Corps
Gareer&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Educ�tion)
Famiry&Consumer Sclenrs—CuGnary Arts,Sewing,Careers w/ChildreNEduc.,etc.
CAild DevelopmeM Presc�ooi and Daycare Programs
Health&Human Services—Sports Medieine,Sign Language,Cosmetology,etc.
Business Etlucatlon = Wortl Processing, Accounting, Business Law & FAath,
Marketlng, Eoonomics,Web Design, DECA, FBLA(Future Busineas Leaders).
Technical & Indastiy — Woodworking, Cabirret Making, Bullding Trades, Metais,
Automoyve & Manutacturing TechnGogy, Welding, DrafUng, Drawing, GAD
(Computeraided Design), E,Iectronics, Engineering&Design,Aviatlon,ASL,etc.
Graphic 8 Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Tri�ter & Stage, Ag &
Horticulture.
Kent Phoenix Academy - Perforrnance Leaming Cerder, Gateway, Vrtual High
School& Kent Success program with evening Gasses for credit retrieval.
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a resuft of schedufing conflicts for student programs, the nead for special'�zed
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possibie to achieve 100% uUliza4ion of
regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual
utilization of classrooms, the Disfict has deterrnined that the standard utllizafion
rate is 85°� for secondary schools. Program capacity at elemer�tary schools
reflects 100% utiBzation at the elementary level,
KeM School D�S�c-Year CepNel Feal3ies Plan June 2015 Page 11
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
CurrenHy,the District has peRnanent progrem capacity to house 27,489 students
and transitional (portabie)capacity to house 2,539. This capacity is based on the
District's Standard of Service as set forth in Secfion I I I. Included in this Plan is
an irrventory of tfie District's schools by type, address and cuRerrt capacity. (see
rab�e 3 on Pege t3�. The ratio between perrnanerrt capaaty and portable rapacity is
96.8°l0-3.4%.
The program capacRy is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional
classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Pian to
reflect program changes implemented in the Falf of 2014. .
For the 2014-15 school year and beyond the state has mandated lower class
sizes in 18 elemeMary schools that ate classified as high poverty. The new ciass
size in gradeg K-1 and 2 wiii be 20 studeMs forevery teacher.
Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are
set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of e�risting schoois is included an
Page 14.
For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional
programs for students in Kent School District:
Kent Mourrtain �ew Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and
home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School
in the western part of ffie district in Des Moines. This school was originaily
designed as an elementary schooi and is included in the eiementary capacity for
this Pian.
Ke�t Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fa�l
2007 in the renovated site and building that forrnerly served Sequoia Middle
School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the
Perforrnance Leaming Center, Gateway, Yrtual High School and Kent Success.
iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has
pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad
offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped aut of high
school and want to eam a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this
Capital Facilfties Plan because it is served in leased spac� at the Kent Hiii Plaia
Shopping Center. Over the past two years, enrollment in the iGrad program has
averaged over 300 students.
Kerrt Schaol�istrict Shc-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 12
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT fdo.4tb
IIdVENTORY and CAPACITY of E703T1N0 SCHOOLS
,. _. ,._ . _ , ..
, _. . . . . . '-- -�� �. � � '�...,. . . 201420i5 �
__.__.__ _..---: . . . .._ .� .�—'----�-•--- _ . .__.__ _...,
v�r
SCHOOL opanea aert ADDRESS Progfam
- _
, , n ___ _ .._ ,_ .._ _
; , . Ca a
Certtage Creat Dememary 188D CC 18236-140q1 Avenue 3E, ReMon 88088 458
Cedar Vatley Etementery t877 CV 286W TlmOailena Way SE. Cwirpfon 98042 364
Cwtrpton Elentenlsly 78B7 CO 17070 6E Wax RoaE. Cwommn 98042 488
Ges6vcodEJemeNary 7� CW 26P26-180MAvemiaSE. Covhqlon 98042 a32
�Es�,t��eeienfeiy 1953 � EFI 8825 S 240M Str6et iGmtt 98031 488
EmeraW Paik 7988 EP �7800 SE2789f Strae; KeM 98031 484
Fa6v/aad Beinente�Y 1889 FW �8800-1481�Avemre SE. Rerdm 88068 408
Cieorye T.Danlel BemeMary 1892 DE 17910 3E 248M ShaBC KeM 98030 428
Olen�ldpe Elame�ilary 1D96 GR 19406-120M Avenue 6E,Renm�980bB 438
Or�s Lake Elementery 1@77 GL SB'f00•191s[Plaee SE, KeM 98042 438
. . . _ ... _ . .. . . .
Horaon Elementery 7990 HE 27841-14411i Aveiwe SE. Ke�d 98MY 477
. .._. .__. _ .. _ .
� � .Jenk7risCaedkElainerrtary 1987_ . JC 28913-186t�,SvemwSE. Covirqton 88042 4SB
KerR Elmiientary 1989 KE 24700-fi4Ui Avanua SouM. Kent 88032 160
Neid Va6ay Farly Leemhig CeMer 2D74 KV 317—41h Ava S.Kerrt,WA 98ai2 336
LEke Vartgs Elemenfgry 1965 LY 19680-142nd Awnue SE. Kent 88042 524
MeAin SoMn BameMery 1987 MS 12711 SE 21&h SL'eet, I�eM 98030 452
.hieadow RNlOe Elemer0ery iB84 MR 27710-108tl1 Avenue SE.KeM 98030 440
Mariafen Elementary 1039 ME ZS821-110U Ave�e SE; K0M 88042 824
MiNenniuin�ntery �OD ML 11B19SEZ701A�36eet, KeN 96030 484
Neery-0'Br�n Ekmerhery 1�D NO 6300 South 2388�Stree4 KeM 98032 i60
PaMhe�LekB EkilleMery 2009 PL 20851�-108U Ave�we SE Kant 98031 604
Park Orchartl�E7ementary 1883 PO 11010 9E 292ntl Slreet Kent 98091 a78
� P6ie lYae ElameMery 1987 Pf 27825-118M Avenua�. KeM BB030 477
RldOevrootl5an1BMe7 1987 RW 1�90-78YntlP1ece5E� f7enton 88038 504
SewyetYVo0i1lEleme�ary 198f SW 31195-7281hAva5E,Bledc�lemord8&NO 486
Sc�tk'FOII Elertimtlsry 1980 SH 2B0'[5 Woodknd WaY SwN, Kent 98030 M8
-Soos Glaek 6mnenlary 7971 SC 12851 3E 21BM Ptflce. KeM 98031 3b2
SprMpbmdt Eleme�ry i� SB 20D3B-700tli Avenue SE, Kant 98031 d18
3untlee Elementery 1992 SR t2300•132`M Avewe SE,.ICetN 88042 643
Elemenlary TOTAL 13,714
(:etler Helphts MMCIe Schod 1983 CH 18840 SE 272 Sfreet,CovinpMn 99042 896
Mettson Mitldta 3thool 188t MA 79400 3E 261at Street Covinpton 98042 T87
Meel�r MMtlia SUiooi 1970 MK 12600 SE 18Zntl Shed, Rmton 98068 &!]
Meri0lan MOCOk Scho01 1938 MM Y3480-120th Avenue 3E, Kent 88031 782
hUB Ueek NAEtlIe Stlfool 2005 MC 820 NMh Central Avenue, Kent BBIXi2 978
NwVm�ootl MlEtlle School 1988 MN 17001 SE 184M Stmet, RerRon 98068 828
MlOtlle Sc�o01 TOTAI. g,�qg
Kertt�teAAien Hlph 9chool 1961 KM 1�20 9E 46Bth SVeet, Kefrt 88090 1.806
Kantlaka Smfa Mph 6tlrool 1997 14, 21401 BE 300tl�SYreet,Kent 8BD42 7,897
KenMtlpe Sanlor Hip�Selpol 79� KR �2480 SE 20Bth Sfmat, KaM 9�37 4,477
KanNioatl Sentor Hiph School 1887 KYJ E6800-186ih Avemm SE, CoWipMn 86042 2,1 W
Sertlor Mph TOTAL 9,1g7
Kerrt Mour�ehi Vle�v AndemY 1997 MVILC 22420 A91Itery RoaC, Des Moines 88198 414
KaM PhoenAc AcEdamy 2007 PH 11000 SE 284M Strset, KeM 98030 � 478
DISTRICT TOTAL 27,q9g
��s�eooi a��s�-vee�c�Pnei Faduu�v�a� Table 3 aune ao�s PaBe 13
0 � N
^ O FNrv/ooO
o � o �°� ��n� Sc�ooB �istric# �o. �15 ,
0 5E Petrovils '� �R�g�yppy (nke '.
w �EWmertFary i Daelre �rying res6dents�of . .
2 N cuma�cres� � �:*
� m�,� m � �'� Unincorporated King County ,
� s���k� ;y �°���� City o4 K�nt
� a �s � � ��, CIt�►�o4 Renbn �
� �ryr ��ry �� ' � Clty of Aubum ;
� ��
T � K�^� � -- Ctty of Sea Tac �
�. o "'0"o"°°' SE 208th 5! �' ,q,�, City of Covington !
� sx�zmst r vanp�ertat� 6nerawrmk ' ':_ �O1°'A' '�
-, � a��,,�„ �„�ry � City of Wlapl� Vailey ,
Y�'�
� � ° �a�a o�� •� City of Black Dfamond
� Elemenfary
�Keni M Pork OfcMni
Awd�omt�wew �o� �e�tmv
1 MehtlWn
eeh�O•BAen y �:� �MIdWeSchooi
� Elamentary � .�.� ��I N SE 240ih Sf
E�.�� SE?AOfh v y
'�• Kent MW Creek 0 OmUel 4 n o�,
QQ��Hemanlary@ g�ry�p� p- BemenfrnY n 2 �� �rt
� o�O�Ru �� � L � �
`a KeM-MaA� E�a���Y SE YvGth st � ����`°ro
F: �
o m
r � Ei9menla 0 C �Adm�h11q1� FJ9�I�wn�aN �SCIWOI ��y�y� PWeloi(a
0
d
ry t Kent Vho � ;�;„ ��� Je�kins � ,.
� 3 ACaciemy z . Creek� Cedar He c
� � 0emenla F,�Mltltlle Sc 1 SL Ri2nU 5t
~ ���m .�0 Y.enhN.ang(sy Road �
� � Horleon� o'� 0Cov1ng1on :
Meadow Ridga � ElertlenbY r°, E���Y �
E�Y ptng ltgp y �a�4 Graes ladte
E�fenfo�' 4 �09 0�enrentary .
M aip��O SE CovYn9lon.geiyYer RQ, ` '.s. .
Lqke
�p `,r gpwy9r ,
��9 .lake H�pSeho I �.�� .
; 28 Elementary Schools '��� ''"�'°"
� 6 Middle Schools swrv�w��
a 4 Senior High Schoois �1°"'�"�°ry
Kent Mountqin View Academy(Grades 3-12)
m Kent Phoenbc Academy (9-12)
m
m
�
V 3ix Y�r Planning and Constructlon Pian
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2015, the following projects to
increase capacity are in the planning phase in Kent Schoot District
e p�nning is in progress fir a repiacement school for Covington Elementary School in
2018 or beyond. The proje.ct is pending saBsfactory flnancial resaurces to fiind ihe
project
= Planning is in progress for additional classroom space for Neely-O'Brien ElemeMary
School This addition wi71 add approximafely 25%m building capaary and is expected�
come online in fall of 2019 pending satisfactory financial reaources to fund the projeet
e Enroliment projectiona reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementery schooi
level.Fi�ture facility and site needs are reflectec!in this Pisn.
o Some furaling for lease or purchase of additional portebles may be provided by impact
fees as needed.Sites are based on need foradditional capacity.
As a critical componerrt of capital facilittes planning, counry and city planners and
decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all studerrts
when reviewing epplications and design. plans for naw roads and developme►rts. This
shouid include sidewalks for pedastrian safety to snd from school arid bus stops as well
as bus pull-ouis and turtrarourbs for schooi buses.
Induded in this Plan is an inventory of potentiai projects and sites ident�ed by the
Distrid which are poteMially ac�ceptable �ite altematives in the future. fsee Taele a on Peye
1B 8 Slte map on Pege 17)
Voter approved bond issues have induded funding for the purchase of sites for some ot
theae and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are induded in thia Pian. Some
funding is sscured for purchase of add�ional sites but aome may be funded with impact
fees as needed. Not all undeveloped propertles meet curcent school construction
requiremerits and some properly may be traded or said to meet future fsciliry needs.The
Boerd M Directors has started the prxess to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015.
2006 voter approval of $106RA bond issue for capital improvement induded the
construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Pardher Lake
Elemerttary, and Gassroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees have been
utilized forthose projects.
In March 2013 the 8oard of Directors reallocated the funding for the new elementary
school to capftal projeds for safery and security.
The Board will corrtinue annual review of standaRi of service and those decisions will 6e
reflected in the each update of fhe Capital Facilities Plan.
. Kent School DlatHct S&-Year Capltal�Fadl@lea Plan June 2015 Pepe 15
KEPdT SCHOOL DISTRfCT No.415
Site Acqulattlons and PmjecL4 Planned to Provlde Addltibn5l Cepacity
- _ . � :_----
. ' . -. . . . . . Wqetted PrCjected %�Por
"._ _._. �.__..._ ,..— _".._... . � . _ - .
SCHOOL / FACILITY / SffE IOCATION T' Sistus Cempletlon prcgram new
-------- __. _ _..__._ .__
�m Ce say aranh
� roaaame>
� ELEkAENTARY
,,. Raqacement
8 Repiawme�d for Cwlnplon Elamentary (ln SE 25ph S6aet 615aih Are SE Elamentery Poanning 201&19 800 18%
Corinpton Elem- Cepadty to be replacetl 77070 SE Waz Road, Covington E�mentary UWzed -5p4
Elementery
Neey-0'BAen Eiemerrtary School-AAAldon(tn 8300 S 238ih Sireek Kent H8032 AtltlPoan PlenNng 2018-20 800 25%
Ciasarooms etltleA M provide New CflpecHy CurteM Cepadty 480+�Zp ryew�gp0 Planninp
AAIDDLE 3CHOOL 8 SENIOR HICiN
No new proJects required far Secontlary Schoola at this Ume&Secontlary Schools are axdud�.trom impect Fee tormu�a.
TEAAPORARY FACILITIE3� Adtlutanel
capaary
Pottablaa' . THD-ForplacemaMesn�ded New Pk�ming 2075. m-a�wd� 10096
�p° ' OTHER SITES ACQUIRED LbitlU°° ��0
�P Deripn.nan Type Jm11WICHon
a Cavinptan aiea NONh (Near Matlson M3) SE 251&184 SE, Covim�ton 88042 UfOan Elamentery GQr oi CoVlfrytOn
B Ccvington erea West (Halteson-Wlkstrom) SE 256&1 Si SE. Coviriqton 88042 Urban ElemeMoiy Y of Covtrytan
3 Hem Lelae aree (PoOard) 1882D SE 2a0, Kerrc 96042 Rurel ElertreMary IQng C¢imty
8 SE d Leke Morton erea (1Ale�et property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Rurei Seco'Mary IGnp Co�mty
2 Shady Lk eree(Sowers,Blafne,Orehota,Parolina) 17428 SE 192 Sfreet, ReMon 98068 Ubari Elementary Ianp County
7 So.IOng Co.Activtty CeMer.(tortrrer Nike aMe) SE 187&170 SE, Renton 98088 Rural T80' IGng CouMy
12 SouM Central stta (Plemmona-Yeti-Wma) SE 288N Sl&124th Ave SE,AuDurn 98082 Ur6an TBD' IOnp Cowty
NOEes:
' U�unded lecdity neetls wIA be ievlewed In C�e future.
=TBD-Ta be delermtrretl-Some sit�are Idantlfietl but placemenC tlml�arMfor cronflpure[lon of porte�lea hes rmt been tleterminetl.
'NumDers�rtespoM So sMes on Site Benk Map o�Pe�e 1 t.011�er Map sfte locetlons are pereels Itlenfl6etl In Table 7 on Pape 28.
Keot School OIsMd Six•Veet Capltel FecOtliea Plan T���@ � Jture 2D15 Page 16
�
� p pg��pngpA�ep //y� qp '
» N ! � :. ��Bl� �V��'��ISA��bY�II VVa aY'��V �
� � � ° � S�� ��n�
� � �� � ;
�.�
� �
� $ �"� � ��� � ��p�r�y Acquisitions �
a �,9�s
o ,��.
� 0 ��
� g�� Efen+en e �[��Oj� �
eEl rtiBntuy �yp� �
d � H���SCF�d ldm�b�uqt .
� � SE�DBth N �
S 212M St Emmdtl PaM
9 EIBnfBIrtaY� E19�IblltOry
� ���� Soo�CraetO
i Ben'°^fvY ,m suMse
NmManfdnVbw S � �rro�r�y �� .
AcatlemY � b1 8 ^ .
Fq ����YD �� m�,y���
Easf/q �kkAe Srind SE 2401h 5Y
3 Ts�l
��I('ent � MA1 CreSGk�M � .
my�. MYAb I' p�y�� }p
a �Rb 1 "�°rM�°'4' Flaronoy M'll"0 £ µ� ,.�
� � �+w $ � � � ��.�:
se assm s p
s dQQ y,� .wmm� �ps� 'ic " � ���y PVeLaxe ,
a 9e�t�ary� 0 CaMer � NIphB`h°°� Elertan�av ...
£ Km�INawVx IdmMnitlbi JenNn 0
U8 �w � ElamxG�inY� �MYtltlN SE 2T2 r1tl 51 ..
ryUpm�y plyps � 0 KonM(anplay Rootl
��� � 4 �� �� �CpWw�on '.
E6moniwY� � lrnY ..
�EIBIIWM'oY
SE 2BE Shea� � .
4.cw�^W° owv«q
Idta
� '� SE30CMShaet Wy��l+o001 ��
L /^�
e ` )��9 NboU�
� \lMorlM E�nww � �
a V 1
y9
a
V
Sf.9JG�$1
i
V I PorQable Cl�ssroore�s
The Plan references use of portable as irrterim or transitional capacity and
facilities.
Currently, the D'istrid utiiizes portables to house students in excess of
permanent capacity and for program purposes at some schooi loca6ons. (Piease
see Appendlces A 8 C O)
Based on enroilment projections, impiemerrtation of full day kindergartan
programs, program capacity and the need for addi�onal pertnanent capacity, the
District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additionat por�bles during the
ne�six-year period.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of the Districi's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. Du�ing the
useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in
some communiGes and increase in others, and these portables provide the
flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community.
Portables may be used as interim or trensitional facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or avercrowding of perrnanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to mset
that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables currently in the DistricYs inver�tory are continually evaluated resulting in
some being improved and some replaced.
The Plsn projeds that the DisVict will use portabtes to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be examined.
Kent School Diatdct S�-Year Cepltal Facill�es Plan June 2Q15 Page 78
V H Y Projected Six Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in 5ection N, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects dass sizs fluduations, gtade level
splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13,
the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison
C�181i5. (See Te61es 5 8 5 A-&C on papes 20.23)
Enrollment is eledronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a morithly basis
and funding apportionmerrt is based on Annual Ayerage FTE (AAFTE). The first
school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment °snapshot in time"
to report enroiiment for the year.
Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington. P-223 Headoount for October 2014 vwaas 28,724 wfth kindergarten
students counDed at 1.0 and exduding EGE and callege-ony Running Start
students. A fu0 headcount of all sYudents enrolled in October 2014 totals 28,090
which includes ECE and coitege-only Running Start studerrts.
In October there were 826 studerits in 71"' and 12�' grade participating in the
Running Start program at diffierent colleges and receiving crediis toward both
high school and coilege gradu9tion. 459 of these students attended dasses onty
at the college ("coliege-on.l� and are exctuded from FTE and headcount for
capaaty aruJ entoliment camparisons. Kent 5chool District has one of the highest
Running Start program participation rabes in the state.
Based on the enroilmeM forecasb, permanent facility inveMery and capacity,
current standard of service, portable capaaty, and future additional classroom
space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requiremer�ts through
the transitiona! use of portabies. �see raore s�u roe�,,sn-e.c o�,ve�zo.2�
This does not mean that some schools will not experienoe overcrowding. There
may be a nesd for additional portables and/or new schools to aa�mmodate �
growfh within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate
placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and
costy movemerrt of relocatabies, zoning changes, markef condi�ons, and
educ�tional restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding end
underutil'¢afion of faailities in differer�t parts of the District.
Kent Schoot Dbtrkt SbaYaar CaDnel Fecllfltlae Plen June 2015 Pega 19
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLIVIENT and CAPACITY
TOT�� �OS���C�
SCHOOL YEAR 2a�ai5 2o�saa 2ois-�� 2o»-ia zo�a�9 2oie-2o 2oza2i
nclua� P R O J E C T E D
Permanent Program Capacity ' 27.489 27,489 27.459 27.489 27.489 27,585 27;705
Changesro Pertnanent Capaciry '
Capacity Increase(F)
Replacement achool wilh projacted increaas{n cepaciry:
Covington Elementary Replacemert �u) 2 600
ro Repkce cvrrent Cwirgton ElemeMary cepeary . -504
Neely-O'Brien Elementary AddiBon-Capacity Increasa �u� a 120
Permenent Prapmm Capaciry Subrotai y�qgg y�qgg 27,qg9 27,489 27,585 27,703 27,705
Interim PortaWe Capeaty °
oememeyvo�me�ecapxxya<area 936 7,832 1,896 2.376 2,688 2,658 3,264
nnome Srnoa Portae�C,p.aH Reqwraa � O O O O O O O
SanqrHqhScnodPatoWeCepaciyRaqWnd � 0 � � � Q Q Q
936 1,632 7,896 2,378 2,688 2,856 3,264
TOTAL CAPACITY ' 28.425 28,121 29.385 29.865 3Q273 30,561 30,969
TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION° 26,566 27,000 27,418 27 798 28,285 28,812 29,406
DISTRICTAVAILABLECAPACITY �,859 2,121 t,967 2,087 1,988 1,149 1,563
� Capacily is based on standard of service tor programs provided arM Is updated periodiplly to reMect program rJian9es.
� Replacement school!or Co4ington Elementary wlli inaease capadty antl wil�be built on a different existing urben slle.
� AddiUon to Neety-O'BAen Elamantary wlll increese capaciry approximately 25°�.
° 2074-15 totel classroom portable cepacity is 938.Some eddillonal relocatables uaed(or progrem putpoaee.
5 Actual Odober Headcount EnroAment with Projecdons from OSPI Report 1049-Datercninffiion of ProJected Enrollmants.
Enroiknent counts and projections have bean ad�usted for Full Day Kintlergarten at all Elementary Schools.
6 School ppaciry meets wncurtency requlrements and aa impacl fees are proposetl Por sernnCery schools.
Kent Schoo�Dis4kt Six-Year Capital Faclllties Pien Table $ June 2014 Page 20
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ido.415
PROJECTED ENROLLAAENT and CAPACITY
��������� ' V�d�� � � s
SCHOOL YEAR 201475 m�aie 2oie-n 2oi�-�s 2oia�e zo�o-2o 2o2ap�
acom� P R O J E C T E p
Elementary Permanarrt Capatlry' 13,2i4 13,288 13,288 13,288 73,286 13,382 73,502
Kent Mountain Vfew Academy 2 414
Changes to Elementery Capacfry
Kent Valley Early Leeming CeMer
Cepacriy Inaease(F�
Cairington ElemeMary Repiacement �u�s gpp
wm reyxe amant COWrqron E�n�b 504
Neely-O'Brien Elemer�ry AddiNon Capedly Increase (u)4 �yp
Submra� 13,628 13,286 13,286 13,286 73,38? 13,502 13,562 �
Portsble Capedty Requfred� 936 1832 1898 2376 2888 2,858 3,284
TOTAL CAPACITY ��Z 14,884 14 91 B 15182 15,852 16,070 16 358 18 788
Atl u¢ted kr FULI De Kinderparten Headcourit
ENROLLMENT/PRQIEC770N td 572 14 924 15,198 1 B,674 16,080 16,379 16 788
SURPLUS DEFlC CAPACITY -8 -8 _�7 _�Z _�p _p� �
NumOm W Pa�e9 FeV��1 9D B8 7B 9B 112 118 �38
125 Clessroom PoRsbles required N 2079-20. 8ome adtlNonal pambias weE tor prcgram pmpo�s, �
� CeDedd b beaetl on sfaMard of eervl�tor P�Greme provided and is updated pe�iodicelly M refiect propram chanpas.
� Kem Moumaln View Acedemy U a speciel prtgfam et the brmer Grendvlew School serving aE�dems in Grades 8-12.
The adiool bWldin6(SormeAy Kefrt Leami`g Center 8 OranAVlew£lem.)was tlesignetl as en alamantsry achcol.
' Repletemant echool Por Covinghon ElemeMery evUl increese capacity antl Is plannetl Por a difierent axisUng urban aRe.
' Addidon to Neely-0'Brbn Elemantaiy will inaease oepeGry approxhnelely 25%.
° Aetuel Octobar HeedeouM Enrolimarrt MM ProJacUnne hom OSPI Report 1049-Detertninadon of Projeemtl Enrolhnenta.
Enrollment&ProJactior�s reflect FULL Oay Mndergerten at ALL Elamentary echoals�1.0&excdutle ECE Preachoolere.
�m snow amo-cc swrm�c�r�mnes amo Tabie 6 A
Juna 2015 PegB Y1
t4EPIT SCHOOL DiSTRICT Ido. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLANEIdT and CAPACITY
6�i�D�.� SC�'IOOL � G�d�� % _ �
scHoal YEAR zo,a-,s za,s,e zo,s-n son-,a io,a,s zo,azo soso-z,
nctue� P R O J E C T E D
Middle Schooi PemfanentCapeary' 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
No Changes to Middle Schooi Cepacity
S�toml 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
Porta6le Capacity Required' � 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY 'g' 5,148 6,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,146 5148
ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 4,195 41$7 4,215 4,208 4,196 4,492 4,605
SURPLUS DEPICI CAPACITY° 953 991 933 840 952 656 543
Humeer a aon�eres Reym�a o 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portebles requiretl at midtlle sdioals at Nis tima.Some PorfaDles used Tor dessroom antl progiam purposes.
' Capadty is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodiceity to reflect program dianges.
2 Actual Octobar HeadmuM Enrollment with ProJections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projeetetl Enrollmarrts.
3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguraiion-Ail 9th grede studants moved to the high schools in Fell 2004.
" Middle School capacity meets concurrency requiremeMs and no impact fees are collected for middie schools.
KaM Schoo�DistriG Sbt-Yaer Capital Fau'li�s Wen 7able 5 B June 2015 aa9e�z
6LEIdT SCHOOL DiSTRICT Mo.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMEPIT and CAPACITY
SE�➢90� �iIG�! - Grad�s 9 - 'Ga
SCHOOL YEAR 207415 2otsie zo��t� zat7-�a 2ote.te za�s�zo 202o-2�
aausi P R O J E C T E D
5enior}ligh Permanent Capacity' 8,713 8,773 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713
Indudes Kerrt Phoenix Academy Z
No Cha es to Hi h School Ca
swuota� 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,�13 8,713 8,713 8,713
�artebles Capactty Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAI. CAPACITY � 8,713 8 713 8,713 8 719 8 713 8,713 8 773
ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION ' 7,958 7,919 8 004 T,9�6 8 00.9 7,941 8,013
SURPWS DEFICI CAPACITY 755 794 709 797 704 772 7pp
Number of Portablea Requlred 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Cleesroom Portables requi�etl at thk tlme.Some Pwlab�a used for Geaeroom aM program purposes.
� Capaaty is 6ased on siandard of aervice tor programs provided antl is updated periodicaly to reflect program changes.
2 Kent Phoenix Academy openetl in Fall 2007 serving grades 8-12 with Tour spedel progrema.
� AcWal October EnrollmeM with ProJecUona from OSPI Report 1049-Detertnination of ProJected EnrollmeMs.
° High School capacity meets concurrenCy requiremsms and no impact fees ere colleCted tor higfi schoois.
KeM School DistAct Six-Year Capital FacHBdea Plen Table 5 C June 2015 Pege 23
V I HI Finance Pian
7he finance pian shown on Table 6 demonshates how tl�e Kent School District pians to
finance improvemeMs for 4he years 2015-16 through 2020.21. The finanang
components indude secured and unsecured fundi�g and impact fees. The pian is based
on voter approval of future bond issues, colledion of impact fees under the State Growth
Management Act and voluntary mitigatio� fees paid pursuant to State Environmental
Policy Act.
In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for
repiacemerrt af Par�ther Lake Elemerdary School with increased capaaty, as welt_ as
construction of a new ElemeMary School to axommadate growtli. The new Panther
Lake Elementary School replaced the previous Panther Lake Elementary in FaII of 2009.
The bond issue aiso funded Phase II of the renovation for MUI Creek Middle School and
renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguretion.as a non-traditionai high school,
Kent Phoen�C Academy,which opened in September 2007.
2006 construction funding aiso provided for addi4ional class(ooms at Kentlaka High
School and two projeds at Kent-Meridian HS. The projects at Kent-Meridian provide
addftional capacityr with severai new classrooms and gymnasium space. The projecte at
K-M are completsd and the new Main Gym added capacity for twro more PE dassrooms.
Some impact fess were utflized for new construction that increased capacity.
Originally, the district designated $18 million of the 2006 bond authorization toward the
construetion of an additional elemeritary school, identified as Elememary#31 in previous
Plans. Due to e change in circumstances, the Board of Directors reallocated the $16
million for ppital projecxs for safety and security.
Replacement of Covington Elementary School in 201&19 or beyonii wiil increase
capacity of ther Current school by approximately 16%. Some impact fees will be utilized
as part af the Finence Plan.
A buiiding addi�on is also planned to prvvide approximateiy 25% additional Gassroom
capacity at Nealy-O'Brien Elementary School in 2019-20. Same impact fees will be
utilized as part of the Fnance Plan.
The Finance Plan inciudes new poftabies to bs purchased or leased to provide
additional capacity snd some may be funded from impad fees.
Enroilmerrt projedions reflect future need for additional cepacity at the elementary level
and ur�funded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annu2l updates
Kem School DisVict Six-Year Capitai Facilities Plen June 201i Page 24
V I 9 Y Finance Plan
of the Capital Faalfies Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this
Plan.
For the Suc-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimatas from Kerrt
School District Facilitiea Departmerit Please see pages 2�27 for a summary of the cost
basis.
Koat School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 201 S Page 25
I
KEP1T SCNOOL D187R1CT Pdo.b16 i
SIX-YEAR FlNANCE PLAN '
i
. . securee un�ea,�ea �mvact �!
Sqi00LFACILITIES ' 2018 2018 2017 2078 2(NB 202o TOTAL LoalBSfete �=alom� Fees�s I
i
EWmiAeO . .fi�t0'iatetl
PERMANEKf FACILRIES '
F $0
Covhgtd�F]arnairtaryRaplewrnenf� U $35.025.0� �535,026A� 529.421�.00D 55,604,W0
AddNion(oNeely-O'&icnFiemerrcary� St5,500,000 515,500,000 5�1.826,000 33,875,000
NO SecrnMarY SUwol ProJeds et Mis Urtre.
7EMPORARY FAqLfT1ES
AEdtflonelportables°'� U 5800.000 F924.000 53,182,700 53.059.836 $1.575,N2 53.941,530 '� 513.183.577 F13,163,877
3 port06108 ! pafaqet 16 paladea 14 poMdes 7 portWMs 77 palobke ,.. �
OTHER
i
N/A �
TOtHl8 -f800.000 5824.000 53,182,7� 538.084R36 517.079.712 �53.841.830 f83:708.577 50 541.098,000 522.B82:b77 �
• F = FUMed U = UnfunCed ��
NOTES:
� Baeed on eatlmates of aclual or future conabuc6on tosb Gom�Fatllitles OeOaAmeM.(Sea Pepe 28 ta Cost Beais Summary� ��..,.
° The Di�riC[aMic�atea reoelvalp som0 State FwWInB Carelrucfbn Asebtenae for come pojecfa. �..
' FedNty neede efe pe�ltlp feVbW.SOmB of�heee Po)eCb meY be fultleC W1tl1 i11Ped feea. .
4 Cosf of pn�blee baeed on curretd eo�a�aOH�sted for(rMafion fwiWure years. ��
°fees M tlds eoWmn are basetl on amowrt M Tees wAeded to Gate�d eef�ated kes on tWure un�s.
Kenl School DisUkl Su•Year Capil�FatlfNes PWn Table B Jwie 2018 aB�m .
V I I I Finance Plan -Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction �rosis are based on cosi of the iast
elemerrtary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next
elementsry schooL
Elemerrtary 5chool Cost Projected Cost
Cost of Parrther Lake Elemerrtary $28,7D0,000
ReplacemeM (Opened in Fat12009)
Projected cost-Covington Elemenfary $35,025,000
Replacemerd (Projected to open in 2018)
ProJected cost of Neely-O'Srien Addition $15,500,040
(Projected to open in 2018)
Elementary Cost based on $35,025,000
Covington Elementary Replaoement
Site Acquisitfon Cost
The site scquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built
on within the last tsn years. Please see Tab1e 7 on page 28 for a list of site
acquisition costs and averages.
KeM School Diebict Sbc-Year Capital Facilides Plan Jwre 2075 Paga 27
KEM SCHOOL DISTRICT Mo.415
Sibe Acquisklons & Cpsta
Average of Slt�Purohased orBuilt on wlthin Iast 1b Years
TYPB a Yeer Open I �������
#On Map $dtppl ! SIt9 Purdresetl Lacafion Aaa Cost Av coaVecre Totel Averege Cost I Acre�. ..
ElemeMery
�3/Utban Paniher Lake ElemeMary ReplacemeM SiOe zooe to�o se 2te st.KaM geatl 9.4D $4,485,013 $477,129
s�urban Elementary Stte(Halleaon&W�7cetrom) zooa t5a35 sE�258 3t.CoNrqron eeoe2 70.00 $7.093,810 $109,391 ���'.
oem�taiy Sita sumota� 19.40 55,578,823 5287,573 '
� Elem al�e avsrage �.
Middte Selaol �.
701 Urban Mitl Creek MS(KeM JM��iNan St.eaeem6lepe 2002 411�432 MdA�an St.,Kent 98032 1.23 $844,888 $888,883 �
auddle sdad sroe 6uMaal 1.23 3844,886 $688�883
C9ddN 8chl 8ke Avg.
SeNa Htph
�t i usen K-M High School Addition ncern e a erin smim� 2�z a zooa i�z sE zssu�saees 8.31 $3;310,000 $524,584
sema rean s�te suh�m 8.37 $3;370,000 $524,584
. SrH18tteA e
Nde:All ndel sNea wme W�dmsed P�af to edopibn of U�ban Gro�vM Atea.
FRim6ere correepond lo locellare on SMe Benk 6 Aoyulddw�a Map on Pege 77. �
Pra urchaceQ Aw to 1898 � .
1/Rurei So.KInO Cow�ty AetirfH Cmfer(f�Hke s8e)PwcheaeG P�r W 1988. �
4l UAmn SNe-Covl�tpn erea NorV�,(So of Mafleon MSy 1884 Totel Acxeepe 8 Cost Total Aversge C�l/Aere �
3/Ru� Site•Hem Leke eaat (P611eM) �sez 26.94 $9,733,789 $381,314 �
8!Wua� SNe-3E at Leke Mwton eree (Weat property) 1993� :
2!Ur6an 6Ne-3hady Leke(Sowers-BlaNe-Orahota-ParoMe) 1995 �
KeM School OIeMd BbaVear Cepllel Faqlitlea Plan Y8t1�9 7 Jwe 2015 Peqe 28 '
__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _
KENT SCHOOL D18TRICT
FACYORS FOR ESTIINATED I�PACT FEE CALCULATION3
Studerk Generation Factors-Singie Fsmlly 3tudent Generation Factors-A�ulti-Famlip
Elementary (Grades K-6) D.257 ElemeMary 0.111
Middle School {Grades 7-8} 0.070 AAiddle Schooi 0.022
Senior High (Grades 9-12) 0.138 Senior High 0.039
Total OA65 Total 0.972
�
Prnjected increased Studeret Capacity OSP!-Square Footage{�r Student
Elemenffiry 1632 ElemeMary 80
Middle School 0 Middie Schooi 117
SeNor High Addition 0 Senior High 130
Speciai Educa6on 144
Requlred Site Acreage per FaciUtyr
Efemantary (required) 11 Average Slte Coet!Acre
Middle Schoot (required) 21 Elementary $2g7,573
Senior High(fequired) 32 Middie Schooi $0
Senior High $0
New Facility Construotion Cost
EIem9Mary° $35,025,000 Yemporary FeClllty Cepaciqr & Cost
Middle$chool $0 Elementary @ 24 $Z00,000
Senlor High " $0 Middte Schooi � 29 $0
•S�cost oesm on Pg.26 Senior High (c$ 31 $0
Temporaty Facility Square Footage Sta4e PundOng Asslstance Gredlt�y-s�e�rcnh
E�mentary 85,615 DIstFlC Funtlirig Aeaistanee PercBnlsgg 67A7°�
Mlddie School $064
Senior High 20,400
Totai 3.4°� 114,079 ConstrucQio�Cost dlloceUon
cca-cosusQ,Fc �tteemre e�ry zo�a) $2D0.40
Peisnanant Facility Square Footage
Elementary (Includes KPA1/A) 1,470,543
Middie Schooi 660,904 Distrkt Averege A,esessed Value
Senior High 1,110,415 s�ng�e Fam�y ttesmence $288,608
Tohdl 96.6% 3,241,862
Total FaciBtiea Square Foot�qe _District Aveeage Rseessed Nalue
Elementary 1,556,158 � Mul6-Family Residence $114,153
Middle School 667,829
Senio�High 1,130,875
To�l 3,354,802 Bond Levy Tax Ra4e!$1,000
Currant /$1,000 Tex Rate(1.8842) $1.41
Developer Provlded Sites 1 Facilkies
Value 0 Generai ObilgaUon Bond Interest R�te
Dweiling Units 0 CurreM Bond Interest Rate 3.68%
Kent SchoW Distrid Spc-Year Capital Facfl'ities Plan June 2015 Paga 2g
KENT SCHdOL D13TRICT
INPAGT FEE CALCULATION for SIPtGLE FAA9ILY RESIDEP9CE
Slte Aequisition Cost parBMgta FartUty Residence
FortnWa: ((AceszCos[O�Acie)lFad Capa xSWdentQerreratlaiFaetor
RepiWircGSdePiaeaOe � Ave(apeSMeCoaUAue PatlBqr�gp¢�y SWdentFacmr
At (ElCmentarY) 17 $287.5l3 �0 0257 $1�354.95
A 2 (Middle Schooi) 21 $0 7,U85 Q.070 $0
A 3 (Senior Hlgh) 32 $6 7.000 .0138 gp
0.465
A `� S�.asa.s5
�Perma�ent FecI1Hy ConetrucUon Coat per 3lnple Family Resitlence �
Fortnula: ((FacilNj/Cost/F - .Cap � x SWdent Fa x Pertnenenlfi'otei Squary Fnpfage(tabp
Conabuc6mCost Fadilb�aPeu�Y StlMenlPacbi . FouteOaRatlo
B 1 (Elementary) 535,025,000 B00 0.257 0.986 $14.49229
B F (M(ddla Schod) ;0 900 0.070 0.968 $p
83 (SeniorHigh) $0 1,600 0.� 0.966 $0
0.4&5 8 `> $14.49229
7emporary Faellity�Cost�r Single Femiy Resitlenw �
Formule: ((Facf6ty Cost f Fadl �. " --' )x SWd�t Facfor x em re 1 TotN usre Foota Ratla
FadBNCoot FaciIXY��Y SWtleMFedor PoolpeRatio
C 1 (Elementeryl $2U0,000 24 0.257 0.034 $72.82
C 2 (Middie Scho9� $0 29 O.U70 0.034 $0
C 3 (Senior M9h) $0 31 g,�g 0.034 SO
0.465 C b S72.b2
Stats Fundin Asslstanea Cestlit � �
8 per Single FamOy R�idence (formerly°State Match
Formula: Area Cost Mawe�e x Sfl uare Feet per stWerd.x FurWi Aseistanca% x Stutlerrt Fectrn
Cautw9mOnxnmcatlm SPISq.Ft13wtlent ASNalenee% 6NdentFechx
D 1 (Elementar� $200.40 90 0.5747 0257 $2.gg3.gg
D 2 (Mltltlle 8choo� $200.40 117 0 0.070 $p
D 3 (Sentw Hiph} 5200.40 t30 0 p.13g $p
D `� $2.863.88
Tax Credit per Single Femily Resldence �
Averepe SF Reaid.entiel Aaseseed Value yZ88,808
Current Datit Serv&x Rata I 51.000 g�.41
Current BcrM IMerest Rete 3.88%
YeaB Amortizetl (70 Yeais) 10 TC a $3,276.08
oevetoper Provided Facility CredFY Faa I SNe VaWe Dweqt Units
a 0 fC o 0
Fee Recap
A = Stte Acquisi6on per Sf Resitlence g1,354.95
B = Permenard Facility Coat per ResWence $14,a92.28
C = Temporary Fadlity Cast per Residena $72.82
Subtotal $15,920.08
D = 9tafe Metch Cretlit per Residence $2,883.88
TC=Tax CredN per Residence $3;276.08
Subtotal $5,939.98
Total Unfundad Need $g,ggp,�p
50%Deveioper Fee Obiigation $8,890
FC=FacUity CredN(if eppllcebls) p
Net Fee Obl'getion per Residence-Single Family $4,990
KeN School Distrid S&-Yeer Capital Faalides Plan June 2075 Page 30
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
II�PACT FEE CALCULATIOId for RAULTI-FANIILY RESIpEPdCE
&ite ACqulsltlon Coet per multl-Famlly Residence UnR.
FortnWa: ((Aaes x Cost�r Ave /Factl )x Slutleirt Genetadlon FaCor
Requ4ed5delaeye Ave�apeStibCmVAae FacRlyCapaofly SW4entPaeb-
A1 (ElemeMeM 11 $287,573 800 �0.117 $58521
A2 (MltltlbSchoon 27 y0 1.085 0.022 $0
A3 (�SeNorHph) 92 SO 1,000 p.Q39 $0
Q.172
A `� Sses2i
PemeanaM Pm;iliry Co�wetlon Caat per AAuitl-FamUy ReslCence Untt �
Fomwla: ((FacHtty Cost/FacA � x SWdent F x(Pe�meneM I Totai Squere F e Retio
. CanaWeBonCoet FMfyCeW�6� StldmtFacler FootpeRaLo
B t (Elem¢ntel� 535.025.OW 800 0.117 0.984 58,248.38
B 2 (Middie Schooq $0 7,065 0.022 0.984 $0
83 {SeniwHiph) $0 1;600 ,Q�,� O.ggq gp
0.172 B K' $5,2qg.g8
Temponry Faclllty Cont per MWU�Femiy Reaiden�e Unit �
Formula: ((Fadllty Coat i Fe Ca x 31Went Fe z em 1 TUai uere Fooh Rptk
Fee�ryCmt F � qpedy 59W'rtFxror FaolapnRaBo
C 7 (BBrtI9Irte(� $ZD�,000 24 0.111 0.034 $31.45
C 2 (Mid�le Stli001) $0 49 0.022 0.034 $0
C 3 (Senior Hiyh) $0 31 0.039 0.034 $0
0.172 C• `� $3�.46
S}effi Fu�Ming Aesiatanee CredR por NuitMFamity Reokb�ca (fortneAy"Slete Matt31'�
Fairnul8: Prea Cost Mw2�e x SPI uere Feat � t sWderR x F�d A581etance% x StudeM Feda
Arq Cwi PAwm�m .9Pt 89.F[/Studa�M1 Eque�don% . &udeM FeeEor
oi �iemernsM szoo.eo eo o.s�a� o.y�� a�.�so.sa
D 2 (AGldtlle 3choolj $200.40 177 0 0.022 30
D 3 (38nbt Hlgh) Z20p,4p 19p p g� yp
D K' $1.750.55
Tax Crodlt per Muh4Ramily ReeNlenp Unk
Averega MF R88itlerd�l Assess�Velue 5114,183
CtarentDeht3ervlceRele/51.000 51.41
C�nrent Bond INe�ast Rete 3.88%
Y9aBAmortlied (tOYBet9) 10 TC b 57,386.90
DevWoper Provltletl Feclllty CreAft Fe !Slh Value Unlla
0 0 FC b 0
fee Recap
A = Sile Acquisltlon per MuN-Fam�1y Urrit 5585.21
B = P¢rrna�errt Fed61y Cost per MF UNt $8248.36
C = Temporary FadPp�Cast per MF Unit $31.45 ,
SubWtel $8,883.02
D m State Match Cratllt per MF Unk 31,150.56
TC=Tex Ctetlk per MF UNt $1,386.90
Subtotal 52,537.45
Tofal UMurnfetl Need �,ffi5.57
50%�evelopar Fee Obqgatlon t2,163 ��
FC m Padpqi CredN(H appllcable) p
Net Fee Obl�atlon per Res�lerNal Unit•9AUIUdemOy $$j$g
Kent Stlwol D1sMc!S�-Year Capttel FacAlNes Plan Ap�l 2015 Pege 31
dX Summary of Changes to 14pri12015 Capital Facflftles Ptan
The Capitai Faalities Plan (the "Pian") is updated annuaily based on previous Plans in
etfiect since 1993.The primary changes from the Aprii 20]4 Pian are summarized here.
Cfianges to capacity corrtinue #o reflect fluduations in class size as well as program
changes. Changes in porta6les or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase,
safe, surpius and/or movement betuveen faalities.
The s4uderrt headcount enroliment forecast is updated annually. Ali Eiemerrtary schools
now have Fuil Day Kindergarten so six year Kindergarten projectia�s wete previously
mod�ed to meet the requiremer�ts for Full Day KindeFgarten programs at a!I Elemernary
sohools.
The district e�ects to rei:eive some State Funding Assistancs (formeriy plled "state
matohing funds'� for projects in this Plan and t,a�c credit fadors are updated snnualiy.
Unfunded sfte and facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
Due to the decrease in the studert generation factor for both singie family and multi-
famiiy housing the District is reducing the impact fees for bofh classes.For single family
housing the fee will be$4,890 from$5,488 a decrease of$496 or 9%. For mufti-family
the fee wiil be$2,163 from $3,378 a decrease of$1,295 or 36°h.
Changes to impad Fee Calculation Factors include:
ITEM ��Tms FROM TO Comments
Student Generation Factor eiem o.nea o.ze�
Single Family(SF) n�s o.izs o.o�o
SH 0.249 0.138
Tota� 0.886 0.465 -.aQt
Student Generation Factor ��n o.szq 0.111
Mialtl-Famiy(MF) nnS o.oes o.oz2
SH 0.118 0.039
Totel O.S22 0.172 -.350
Shte Funding Assiatance Ratios t°s�m�r� b8.ta% 57.a7% Per oSa�Wehaite
Area Cost Altowance�former soe�cn index> 5200.40 $200.40 Per QSPI Webslte
Average Assessed VaWation(A� s� S2a5,e�� 52ea,so5 Puget Suund ESD
AV-Averaga of Condaminiums&Apts. �F 597,880 5114.153 Pupet Sound ESD
Debt Seroice Capital Levy Rate/$1000 at.ss S�.a� Per King Co.Assessor Report
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate a.oa� a.se% stoomberp eond euyer inaex
Impact Fee-Single Family sF ES,aes ga,sao Decraese of Ea9a w 9%
ImpadFee-Mu4ti-Family MF 53,3�8 82,�ss DeereaeeMgy,2isorss%
KeM Schoof DletBct Six-Year Capiial Facilities Plan June 2015 Paga 32
i
-KENT�8CHOOL OISTRICT No.415
BTANDARD of��8ERVICE-- PROGRApA-CAPACITY -�INVEMroRY of:PORTABLEB - FTEend��NEAUCOUNT:ENROILAAENT
i
! KSD f . ��! Num60f'Of...31dMIphCep s6E/P �$pecld Yp1421116 Proplam Geartoorci RebcelehM 70H/2014 �... 10Hf20U � ... HI j'� �
� ELEMEMNNY ABR 6mvHqM1CA Capa�y Proprem Propiam Use� We CepecXy PYx1FfE9� PY23FidmurR POV° %' ��. :
'� BCHOoI � I qeumome mLew�eps' .CR CeV�Y° PaleEbs Portabbs ns1n.n�.' En,almenl Ervo&mrR '�
Cartiepe Creet CC 18 498 8 10 q58 1 0 0 988.88 42d N �
CaduVepey CV 76 3// 8 ZO 784 2 7 2/ 1BZAG Y92 Y
�n8� � �0 481 6 24 188 1 0 0 434.W C88 Y �
CIBbhWod CW 1B 432 9 0 �,t7 1 4 BB 468.00 488 N �.
EestHitl EH Yp 4!8 0 10 OBB 0 7 76B 692A0 692 Y
Firereld Pork EP 21 {B4 1 0 J84 0 2 CB M9bU C87 Y '.
Felnwotl FW 17 q08 3 0 408 1 2 48 S97.SO 424 N
T.OanblFJam OE 78 106 9 2I dtB 0 7 24 688A0 688 Y
6lenrldpa 13R 79 <�8 .1 0 A18 7 1 ?A 4i8.60 a68 Y
C�feeaLeke Gl 1B 41B 4 20 498 1 7 20 488.10 623 N
Hor4on HE t1 411 4 0 477 0 7 77 It8d0 M7 v
JankkreCre�k JC 18 N5 7 M 459 4 0 0 9�3.03 378 N
KaMElemaMary � YO �9p S 0 �!0 1 7 77 874.00 OT6 Y
KeM Veiley Eaily Laem.CTR M/ 74 aD8 0 0 At8 U 0 0 180.00 184 Y '�
lAiro VWlpa LY 21 600 7 20 b24 0 0 0 458.00 481 N �I
MaRln 8oNun M8 19 1]8 3 24 �OR 0 S 7i 870.60 813 Y �.
NaaAowRld MR 17 77R 8 88 t00 0 4 BB 781A0 881 Y
W�WanBemerGmy u� 21 SOC 3 20 526 1 4 BB SBB.W 841 N '
� NOUBIIMU111 EIenIMlferY YL 20 � 1 ?A �M 0 2 /B 877A0 8fl Y �,'�
Neely-0'BIMn NO 40 �80 6 0 �80 1 10 2b 651.00 691 Y
PenHmrLeke Pl 27 A61 8 f0 Q04 t 7 1B8 BBB.00 86E Y
PMOrchard - PO 18 It2 7 EO 478 7 4 9B 663A0 667 Y
PlneTm pt 21 <67 4 10 477 1 8 1M SSUAO 670 Y
' Ridpewood RW 21 60.t 1 0 SOC 1 2 48 475.03 508 N
Waotle S1N 21 IBB 2 0 488 0 0 0 417.78 155 N
ScenkHiq 8H 77 �80 8 68 �N8 A 8 1a 810A0 etD Y
800eCreek� 8C 18 377 4 30 ]�1 7 2 48 �70.80 �.16 Y
SpAnpbrook SB 17 �OB 4 10 418 7 t �8 675.00 617 Y
Similae SR 21 609 2 0 513 0 3 72 675.55 553 N
KantMMn.VM�YA[ademy MV 14 368 9 BO NB 0 0 0 - 114.30 118 N
�IeryTOTAL1Q 668 18.070 120 680 19.830 29 79 7.898 74.092.87 14,571 ,
'Elemenle�Y denaroom cep�y h Es�ed on everepe ol2l:20.71 Y�K-38$8 N GraOee 48.6xfiMee eQtiNneMeTadefs dm leductlon ot M�P�B��� .
'Ke,rt 3clwd Ohuld StentlmA W 6aMce resarvee aane moma for P�V�B�a.k.20 TWaI�18 StandmA F t CanP�er leb+i Mwic H.I�ted Pioprem�nomrt ��
'u.iemem.�y s�oo�e have F�n oay�pmia�-�z FOK pRq�m me sm�rumea.�bwha wd�.s a sF-Fotc��.o-vzzs t�amuM�m�ae�anm��.o.
�EYrcpM�Y�Ipola hew 100%epeu uE'�tkn rta vM ra e�u�fa P�-0mo weoltlaauowns CouMs e�duEe ECE Prmchookm 6 Wece§reaeneU for EGE cYasmoms:
°ElemaMmY Schoda M bWd dM e�a dme9leA as f9ph PoreAy eM tlaza emB In predm K.1 Ic 20:1 �
�sa,oa omna str-veac�Fer�rmn APPENDIX A ,nme zms raae sa
KEMT SCHOOL DI3TRICT No.41S
BTAFIDARD ot SERVICE - PROGRAAA CAPACITY - INVENTORY of pOR7A8LES - FTE and;HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT
Kao ea wm.e .eeim eow+m spee svedel' xo�<=�s rrop�em crosuoom a.loc.m. �avmu �onnou� .. ..��.
A60dF ABR Std CepeW�'° 6L� Pr9m �9� � Uee U88 Cepetld 'P229hTE° HBadColHlta�. �
aCHOo� �Chrme etY62B qs Ceadb Cbntn CapedlY' Porfebbs PorleMea� at2Dee. Eiaolment': �Emdlment'. ,
CedarNelBh�sMkld�e9dtod CH 30 740 8 84 8. 71 89S' 2 0� 0 845A6 847 �
i
Me�kunk5tltl1e8d�Wl MA 29 692 8 78 5 779 787 6 1 2B 805.02 808
MeekerMNdbSclqol MK 28 715 8 99 1 24 8ffi� 0 0 0 �881.80 883 !
Merlllf&1 Midtlie Scfad A,U 26 g17 S 5B 4 95 782 4 1 28 88Y.00 882 '
MPoCreBkN9tltlbS[hod MC 39 819 5 68 2 q8 �818 0 2 58 �878.00 878
MaNlwood M19dae 6t1ad NW 33 818 2 18 4 96 B28 0 0 0 8SB.80 840 ..
Kent NaurRain 1fievAeaOemy(Ciredes 3.t� LpdEh Sq�ap praAe 7•8 Emoliment See FJem 88.16 68 �
MItlAfBSshodTOTAL 176 4,914 34 982 70 482 .9,148 11 4 178 d,789.87 4,105
APPENDIX B
Ksu s« samm a��p �w�a sye� s�' sm�zma aro�am cressmom a�s im�rzo�a �a�rm�a
SENKKt HM,N ABR Sti Cqmiy eu dy, Rpm Propran Rogram Uee Uae Cepetlty P?29 FTE' fleadmuM�����
SCNoo� Clumn a!Y6J1 Gs Ckmo C Capedty' Patedas Portedea at 31�. Emo4ment Ervolqnent '�..
O
KeM-Meritl1�19erdorFflgh KM 58 t,078 12 167 12 277 1.800 0 9 279 2,007.80 2.076 �
, KentlOkBSe�tlOrHiph IQ b8 1,423 13 163 78 3Bi 1.957 2 0 0 1.371.W 1.a25 ..
Ifen4Wpe Sanbr Hlph KR 85 1.713 1� 138 18 428 2277 1 2 82 2.026.00 2.U87 ''.
KeMwoo08eidaHigh KW eU t681 B 102 20 /78 2,180 2 8 188- 1.61620 1.9/� �
Kemrnounmmv�ewqcaaenn(c�de,a-�2) senw�r�qncrmea-�2�,uonment sesoem �aezo �ea
K�lPhoenizAraOamy PH 474 414 287.00 296 �
ReplonglJu5lkeCeirter� RJ WA WA' 6.00 8 '�..
6erdorH TOTAL 23B 0.H07 47 548 Be 1.568 8.7H 5 17 527 7.88810 7,856 I.
APPEFdDIX C �wnAunr�npsm�ts
�any cne�,00a r�s�wem.
DISTRICT TOTAI e�s x.ee� zo� �.aso as x.00e z�Aee 4s �oo z,ssa zs.eae.as zs.�za.00
' 3Peaa�Piogrem capacdy ir�tlea Gaswoam reqiaMn sa��1 wa such es Spadm Eeucatlat Cereer a rechnke�ea�calkn aroRems.Compubr tsm.etc. �.
'9em'da�ysdimlc�edlybaAJusledfar�96,WT�timrataFedRtyUaeShMywasupAeEadPorpogramdm�geaM207475 � ��
� EnmtlmemisrepptetlonFlEBHeadoou�lCesb.�P225FbaiwuMexdWeaECE6COAaB�NY18mn4gStmtsWdenlaFu6hea0oourd�rVECE6R3=28.090.
Some bl�e nmy ba s6�tly dd�erenl due to�aa�ng. .
� 13�,Wve'dles eervr�l ffi Ktg County Regqnel J�dw CenOer e�e igpphgy s�e�•�q h�f��y Fumm�g on Form E-072.Tdal W wint In Octoher 2019 is f0.
KentSchoolDk9ici31x-Yeer(�1181FadIq�Ra� Total of dppendit�s A B �tC Jure2qi5 Pape3d
;
KEIdT SCHOOL DISFRICT Mo.416
USE of PORTABlES
ScfrodYear 201q-ZptS 20152078� 2078-1(H7 2pt7-2018 201&2019 . . . 201&2020 20262021
Relocatable Use � r».or sewm rh�r snw� r+o.a swma 'm.a swa.r ea« emmm r+o.a snmwx rio.a sue.n
�m�bk� OepecdY Rtlo�slmb Cepa� N�b Rebc�Ww C RNocYauae ReNUNOMe RtlomlWhs
Rela�lables for ciassr�m use 39 79 83 99 712 179 138
Relorafables for propram use 45 45 45 45 45 48 46
(Ie..Computer laba.musk,etc.)
Elementary C�acMy Required�24 z � 838 1g 7,898 83 1,892 B9 $978 112 2,BBB 119 2,888 798 �,284
M�a���aY R��� 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sdifw Ffiph Capadly Requued�31 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
#otRelorafeblesUtll¢ed sa t24 t2e �4a t57 tea te+
��e��aa°�eb��C�dIY Re�ired 39 836 78 1,998 8g 1,982 99 2,376 112 2,668 719 2,888 196 9,286
Ptan for AilocaUon af Requlred Classroom Relocatabie FaalPoes imitided in Finar�ce Pian:
Elemantsry ��x 39 �e ea ss a�z �te �3a
bllddle Schoo� o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serriw High 3 0 0 0 0 0 o a
T� � t8 &t 88 112 119 1S8
� Uee of adtlttlonN potfnbla fo�clessroome or epeciel proproms Is beaed on�reed emi fiuciwtlons of enmllmeM M eeeh aehod. �
Z Fuit Day MnderpeNan etall Elementary edroola wlll inereaee Uia nead for portaWpa etthe ekmer�ry 1ev91�MII pemlB�Mnt ceaHcity can be proaltled. ��.
a AMhough PoAsblw a�e w�lzee�ora wlaa
variah a WrPaaes,rewconatruCHon entl 6oundery e�w6ne�la me Omed W m{Mmhe Nre�requlreme'K Por�elowla6lee.
KeM Sdiad OkMd Six-Vear Cepitel FadINMa Plan 14PPEWDDC -D aure zo�e �e� �
�ntr scxoo�o�srnicr nw.ass
Survey fa Student Generetlon Factor !
1
5 T U D E N T 5 -�S�CQeneretlon Hctor.
Single Famity Developments Units Tota1 Elem �MS HS Total dem MS HS
MmN�s Cwe 87 37 27 3 7 OA25 o.31a 0.030 0.080
Ns�e larre 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 OA00 0.000 0.000
Aimandale 24 5 0 3 2 0.206 0.000 0.125 0.083 -
AquaVktaERates 2 0 0 0 0 O.WD OA00 0.0� 0.�0 .
Avalon Court 26 10 8 0 2 0.385 0.908 0.000 0.077 '.
eattisti 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.�0 0.000 D,000 '�.
Be�mark 54 19 9 4 6 035t 0.167 0.074 0.111 '�.
8enson Hills Oiv No.01 1 0 0 0 0 OA00 0.000 0.000 0.[IW
BemonPlxce 1 0 0 0 0 D,OW 0.000 0.000 O.WO
�8 K S 6 4 0 2 1.204 0.�0 0.000 0.400 .
86dsong Meeduws 3 7 1 ] 4 2333 Q333 0.667 L333 '
81alrLane 1 0 0 0 0 OAOD 0.(100 0.000 O.OW
Boliman 10 SS 5 4 2 1.100 D.SOD 0.400 0.200 �
B�aun The 17 2 1 3 0 0.136 0.059 OA59 0.000
.. 9rookfleltl 2 0 0 0 0 O.OW 0.000 0.000 0.000
Brookz(deCourt 25 6 4 1 3 0.2C0 0.360 0.040 0.090
GnaryHill I6 2 3 0 0 0.125 0.135 O.00D O.OW
Canten 75 39 26 4 9 0.520 0347 0.053 0.120
CedarVolnt 41 18 1U 4 4 OA39 0144 O.WB 0.098
Cedar Tertece 1 D 0 0 0 0.000 OA00 OA00 0.0�
[hancelbrClest 1 2 0 0 ] 3A00 0.000 0.000 2.000
ChateauMeridian S 0 0 0 0 O.O�U 0.000 0.000 0.0�
Che�ryTerrace 7 0 0 0 0 OA00 O.IXID 0.000 O.OW
dtyView 7 I 0 0 1 O5� o.OW 0.000 0.500
Ckrk Lake Estates D(v No.01&No.02 32 20 12 1 7 0.6L5 0.375 0.031 0219
Coatp 5 0 0 0 0 OAW D.000 0-000 0.000 �
Copper Hlil 19 S 4 1 3 OA21 0111 O.M3 0.158 ��
famerstone lOC 68 41 8 39 0.651 0.394 OA77 0.183
Cottonwootl 2 0 0 0 0 OA00 �O.OW O.OW 0.000 .
CottomwoodCourt 6 1 1 0 0 0.367 0.167 O.OW 0.000 ,
CovingtonPlat 8 0 0 0 D 0.000 0.000 O.00D 0.�0 �
CovingtonPoiMe 11 �1 1 0 0 OA91 OA91 OAW 0.000 :'
Crestvlew Trazts Div Na.03 3 3 3 � 0 0 1.00Q 1.000 0.000 0.000 ,
Gokon Hills 4 0 0 0 0 OA00 OA00 O.00U 0.000 �
GoWes 28 18 6 3 9 0.603 0.214 0.307 0.321 �
Crown Te'rece 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.�0 0.000
trowsist 1 0 0 0 D 0.000 O.DW D,O� 0.�0
DiamondAcres 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 O.WO OA00 O.WO �
EagleGeek AS 1i 6 3 3 0.250 0125 0.063 � 0.063 �
Fast CuNNd 3 0 0 0 0 O.ODO 0.�0 0.000 0.000 ,
Kmt Sd�ool UkMct SI%-Year Gpibl fa�HMes PHn /1PPENW)(E lune 2015 Pega 36
KEPR SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 �
Survey for Student Generdtbn Factm
S:T.UDEN;TSi� . . !St�dent6aiwotlokCetEor� ..
SIn�aFam11y0evelopmertts Units TMaI Ekm MS HS � Total .. .. Ekm MS H5�
EartHmGardens 1 0 0 0 0 D.WD OAOD O.00D O,ODD
Extmont IS 3 1 D 7 0.120 0.090 0.1100 0.080
E��� 3 0 0 D 0 0.000 0.000 Q000 0-0W
Ervh�EKates 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.�0 0.0D0 a.000
Fe�rfuve�Uiv Mo•3 2 0 0 0 0 0.000 OA00 0.�0 0.000
Fel�woodParkDNNo.06 1 0 0 0 0 OAW 0.�0 OA00 0.000
Fem Gezt Div No.i % Bl 41 13 � 0.894 0.427 0.115 0.302 �
Fem Gest piv Na 2 75 78 42 15 21 1.M0 0.560 �QIOD 0.280
fem Crest Dfv No.3 20 18 12 1 4 0.900 0.600 O.lOU O.N10 ��.
�em Crest N�est 129 80 49 12 19 O.6M 0380 0.093 0.147
ReltlstoneDiv02 26 13 7 4 2 OSW 0.769 0.154 O.Q77
RslwEsbtes 2 1 0 0 1 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.500 -
RowvCourt 31 6 3 0 3 0.194 0.097 0.000 0.097 �
!»rei[RWge Court 13 1 1 0 0 OA77 �O.OI7 0.000 0.000 �
Fremer 7 0 0 0 0 O.OfM1 OA00 0.000 0.000
Gage'sGrove 32 12 5 1 6 OS45 0127 0.065 0.279 �
GeMTon 61en 6 3 3 0 0 0.367 0.167 0.000 0.000 �
GerdsonGreero 17 7 1 3 3 OA32 0.059 0.1�6 0.176 '�.
Glemw/ood 3 2 0 1 1 0.667 0.000 0.333 0333
GutnnCratNa.02 2 0 0 0 0 0.000 .0.000 OA00 0.000
NaleysNWge 19 9 2 2 5 OA74 0.105 0.105 0.163 ,
Flawkesbury Wv Mo.01 18 7 Z 1 4 0.389 0.711 0.056 0.221 ,
Hightand 6�tes SouM 24 4 3 0 1 0.167 0.125 0.000 OA42 :
MghWnd Patk Toernhouses BSP I6 1 1 0 0 0.063 0.063 0.000 0.000 '
NiShrtd9eTenxe 3 0 0 0 0 O.OW OA00 0.000 0.000
Htll'S EVeBreen Esta[es 2 0 0 0 0 OA00 OD00 OD00 0.000 �
F�dly�wcl 1 0 0 0 0 O.(p0 OA00 0.000 0.0� ',
HomeRead Acres DN No.02&Qi 2 1 0 0 1 OS00 OA00 O.OW 0.500 ,
Ha�d Mils Ertates 7 0 0 0 0 O.OW 0.�0 OA00 0.000 .
IenysVlaae 1 0 O 0 D O.00D O1qU OA00 O.00D
lohnson NNs 4 1 0 0 1 0250 OA00 OA00 0.250 '
Kam 9�h 11 0 O 0 0 O.OUD 0.000 0.000 OA00 �
xemewd, � a o 0 0 0 000 omo omo o.000
K]q 111 � 7 3 3 0 0 OR29 OA29 OA00 0,000 ,
1(ent 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 d000 0.000 ��.
KeMScenkPark 1 0 0 0 0 OA00 0-000 0.0� 0.000 .
KentVkw 1 0 0 D D 0.0� 0.0� O.WU 0.000
Kmfara 43 7 0 3 0 0.163 0.093 0.070 0.000
Kentleke HlghlanEs Div 7A 314 80 55 8 17 O.N2 OA62 0.070 0.169 �
Kentiake Hi�lands Dhr 18 123 68 52 6 10 0553 OAi3 0.049 OA81 -.
Y.ent School0istrict5ia-Yex Gpib�haliCes Plm APPElYDI1I E Junc 2015 Poge 37
I�NTSCHOOLDISTWCTPb.435
SurveY for StudeM Gmeration faMor .
� � � 'StUOENfiS . � �` �.`�ude�rt6anmaHonP6cLcr�
5mgleiamiNDevebPme�ts Unifs Total Elem MS HS Totel �Elem �MS HS
KMtlakeHlghYdndsWv2 10 7 0 4 3 0:700 0.000 OA00 03�
KentlakeHighWndsDlv3 63 40 28 4 8 0.635 OA44 OA63 0.127 '
�ngsleyGim 1 3 1 0 2 3D00 1.000 0.000 ].0� �
KrcelkKndi 3 0 0 0 0 O.OW OAW D.O� O.WO I
LakeDesireSummerHomeirs 7 0 o a 0 0.000 O.WO 0.000 0.000 ;
IakeasireVlew 4 1 1 0 �0 0350 OZ50 O.WO 0.000 i
Inke Meitd'wn Grove 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.0� OA00 ODIXI �
lake Meridian Point 30 17 7 3 7 0.567 0.233 0.1� 0.233
lake Morton Trs 12 3 0 1 Z 0.250 0.000 0.063 0.167 �
laurelGlen 17 16 4 3 9 0.947 0.235 0.176 0.5P9 '
�r:w�ei� n v �o z s o.na o.nss o.osi o.u�
unks i a o 0 0 o.00a o.aoo o.000 o.aoo
Inchows Lake SawyMTrt 3 2 1 0 0 0.667 0.667 0.000 0.000
Maclyn 1 D 0 0 0 0.000 O.00p 0.000 0.1700
MaI1klUdge 8 0 0 0 0 0.000 OAIX7 0.�00 O.00D
Mam 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
MapleCreek 17 0 0 0 0 0.0f� 0.000 0.000 0.�0
MeaGows at Wke Sauryer 20 6 1 1 �3 0.30U 0.300 0.050 Od50
Medallion af Kmt 18 4 3 � 0 3 0.222 0.056 0.000 0.167
Merldlan PoOtte 12 12 4 0 0 4 Od33 0.000 O.00D 0.333 .
MeridianRidgeDIV02 14 5 3 1 7 0.357 0.114 0.071 O.Wl ,
Meridian Traoe 1 0 0 0 0 OA00 OA00 0.000 0.000 �.'
Meri�anValkytounnyflub 4 0 0 0 0 OAW' O.OW 0.00D OA00
Meridiare No.02&No.03 3 1 � 1 0 0333 O.00D 0333 0.000 ,
Mlllhrook He(ghts 16 19 1] 4 4 1.188 O.6B8 O.S50 0.250 ��
Milkrs Norihem V'xw 3M 1 2 I 0 0 2A00 2.000 0.000 0.000 ,
MlstyMeadows 1 0 0 0 0 OA00 OA00 0.000 D.WU
MorfoNMeadowsSartA 5 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 '
Morgads Creek 13 10 6 2 2 0.769 OA62 0.159 0.154 ��
Morgarfsflam 45 22 14 1 7 OA89 0.31] OA21 0,156 �
MouMainVkwVkb� ii 2 1 7 0 OA94 OAdB 0.068 0.000 �',
MouMahrtop Ime 1 0 0 0 0 OD� 0.000 OA00 0.000
MulderPlat 15 31 18 4 9 1240 OJZO 0:160 0360 '
NORhPark 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 - OA00 0.000 O.WD :
NorthParkeMeedows 46 36 19 9 8 0.783 - O.a13 0.1% 0:17a
North Shore of Lake Sawyer 8 0 . 0 0 0 0.� 0.000 0.000 OAN1D .
OakleigA OW 1&Div 2 43 3 3 0 0 QQ70 DA70 0,000 Q000 � ,�
Otympk Oeak Estates 17 6 4 0 2 0.222 0148 0.000 0.074 ,
PandherGten 10 S 5 1 l 0.8� 0500 0:100 0.20D ,
Panther Iake Garden Trs 3 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.0� 0.000 O.OW ���.
Kerlt School INstNcf Six-Y¢ai Capital FadfiCes VIa1 QPPEN�K E IunB 2015 PBge 38 '
�XENf SUWOL OLSTRICT Pb.415
Survey for Stude�rt Generatio�hctor
� . � . 57UD¢N,TS�,. . ._ . ._. - - � �._:Student(�nFeeturi. .. .
Singk famfy Rrvelopmen6 Unitz Total Elem MS HS Total Ekm MS �HS
Pa�k"�' 44 f9 1I 2 5 0:43i 0,2T! OACS 0.114
Plerces Firrt 1 0 0 0 0 O.00D 0.000 0.000 0.000
P�ne Lake Sotilh 3 0 0 0 0 0.�0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plne Trea Farms 9 2 0 1 1 0.722 0.000 0.111 0.111
Maleau at Panthv lake 103 87 49 i6 22 0.H61 0.485 0.158 0.238 �.
PaiNerVlstaatlenkinsCreek 137 �8 74 11 13 0.350 0.175 01180 U.095
Reierve rt Mapre Valley fi0 5 5 0 0 0.083 0.083 0.000 O.OW '�
Resen'e 1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.0W 0.�0 O.OW
Rldge at Ganison Geek 27 ifi 6 4 6 0.727 0.173 0.182 0.173
aa�e��c�s.w�oN n n s x i z o.z3s o.oss o.o+e o.a�s
wage ac uke sew�e. Za s s o o a:so azso o.aoo o.aoo
Kdge et Vatrtha take D'w 1 80 53 76 8 19 0.663 0925 OS� 0.738
Rosa+Meadow ] 0 0 0 0 0.000 OA00 0.� O.WO
RqalCrestEs�ates �6 I7 8 1 3 0.750 OSUO OD63 0.788
RuddNPs 3rc1 1 0 0 0 0 OA00 0.000 0.� 0.000
3chwer Fsbtes 13 2 0 1 1 0.150 0.000 OA77 O.Ol7 i
sc+no�me�s� ss o 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 000 o.aao
ShadYlake 17 5 2 2 1 0394 0.118 0.118 OA59
SmIfMROprhard7rs 2 0 0 0 0 OA00 O.OW 0.000 0.000
SoosCreekFlveAcreTret[s 3 1 1 0 0 0.333 0333 O.OW O.00U �
SonCreekPeh 2 0 0 0 0 OA00 0.000 O.OW 0.000
SaphleGlenn 57 16 IZ 2 2 0.283 D.111 0.035 OA35 �.
SD��B Brook PkrAve Trs 24 13 8 3 2 0542 0.333 0.1]5 0.063 '�.
uarcres�x�d � o a o a o.000 o.000 o.000 o.000
Starmeadow i 0 0 0 0 O.00D 0.000 0.l100 0.000 . �
SuMrest 1 0 0 0 0 O.00D 0.000 0,000 0.0�
Sunr�ord 55 38 25 5 8 0,691 0.455 0.091 0345
SunrryHi�INo.02 2 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 OA00 0.000
7ehoma Vhte 19 6 4 1 t 0.316 0.213 0.�3 OA%3
, Tal6o[IUdge Eqata 27 1 1 0 0 O.00S 0.045 0.0� 0.000
TerrawPahl6AaeTrs 2 0 0 0 0 O.00D 0.400 O.OW O.00U
mm�eriare es�es onr ra.ai i o 0 0 0 0.00o a.000 o.roo o.roo
TrovilskyDerkUNOl&DN02 t9 27 11 T 9 1.031 0579 0.368 OA74
UneedanOM�a�dTrs 31 6 2 3 1 0.194 0.065 0.097 0.03t
VvdeMesa . 1 0 0 0 0 0.00� 0.000 0.0� O.WO
vfla Real 3l8 38 23 5 10 O.t97 0.180 0.039 OA79
VllhgeCreekEstates 31 IO 15 3 6 0.774 O.4B4 0.097 0.194
VI�a Verk 2 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 oA00 .
Walther's 2 5 3 1 1 ].500 i50D O.SW 0.500
Wa�hfngtanCentrellmp 17 2 1 0 f 0.118 0.059 0.0� 0.659
I(eM School dsbkt 9x-Year 4pkel Fedtltles%an APPENDU(E Iwre 2015 Vege 39
KErvr scxoa osrnicr roo.ais
Survey for Student Generorion iactor
57 U O E N,T S , i yypaqK gp�ae�yp�ycbr -� � ��
Single Famlly De�elopmeMs Units Total Elem MS� HS Total Elem M5: HS
WatermansAae7n ' 4 1 0 0 1 0,250 0.000 OA00 O.t50
WMerUcePlace 42 9 8 0 1 0,214 0.190 a.000 0.024 .
WeflCreekCourt 11 2 0 1 1 0.181 0.000 0.09f 0.091 "
WestShorcollake5ewryer 8 1 0 3 0 0.125 0.000 0.125 0.�0
Westmont Vlsta Ph 2 +
25 4 0 D 4 O.SfiO OA00 0.000 0.160
W(Idwood Rldge Om±&Txro 24 2 0 0 2 0.083 0.000 0.000 0.0H3 .
Wllsons ] 0 0 0 0 O.ODO O.WO 0.000 0.000 ��
Wingfield 116 56 7$ 8 ]0 0.475 0.237 oA68 0.169 � ��'
Wingfleld NoM 45 15 9 1 5 0.333 0.200 OA?3 0.111 �
WIMNwOod Esbtrs Div No.06 1 0 0 D 0 0.�0 OA00 0.000 0.000 ��
w��+�� 15 lG 15 0 9 1.6W 1.W0 OA00 0.600 �
WoodbNdgel 6 1 1 0 0 0.167 0167 0.000 nAOD '�,
Wooddale&WoadgroreatFairwood SS 16 11 0 3 0.255 0200 OD00 0955 '
W���� 12 IS 5 2 4 0.917 OAl7 0167 0.333
Woadside at McGarvey Pa�k DW 3,5,6 4 3 �3 0 0 0.750 OJ50 0.000 O.OW
Unnamed-Si Fami DevelopmeMs A35 172 71 26 75 0395 0.163 0.060 0.172
Totals 3,867 1794 992 7b9 533 0,464 0.257 0.070 Q198
S�TUUENTS: i � '.StUd'¢ntGB118f9tl011fdCtOC . �� �
Multl-FamiNDeveloPments Unks Total Elem MS HS 7otal Elem M5� HS
East Pdnt 9) 38 20 8 10 0393 0.206 0.082 0.103
FirPcreSNo.l 1 D 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.�
Grand Design 2 3 2 0 1 1'.500 - S.tl00 0.000 0.500
Hei6htsMWdgMew 7f1 q 3 0 1 OA57 0.073 �0.000 0-014 �.
laurelCourtTownhomes i6 0 0 0 0 OAW 0.000 0.000 a.000 �.
UurellaneNomes 27 p p 0 0 O.WO 0.000 OA00 O.�D
i
MeplewoodGrove 17 7 4 7 2 OAl2 0.235 0.059 0.118
Parkse�Rent 245 35 15 4 6 0.241 0.1T2 OA28 0.043
RiuervfewNortfi 187 .gp Zp 3 7 0160 0.107 OAl6 0.037 �
StonebridgeVipnge 31 5 3 1 1 0.156 0.09E 0.031 0.031 I
Yiewaest 190 12 9 1 2 OA63 0.047 OA05 0-011 ;
D�aNamApartmeMs 17fi 0 0 0 0 OD00 O.OW 0.000 O.pMI '
Urmamed-.Apar6nenb 6 ;7 21 3 8 5333 3500 OS00 1333 �
Totals %6 lfifi 307 21 38 0.172 0.331 0.022 OL39
!
I(cmt Scfiod DlNrict ShaYear[epkal FacliPoes Plan APPENDIX E lune 2015 PagNO
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE I
For I
Kent School District No.415
2015 Capital Facilities Plan
Issued with a 14-day commePrt and appeal period.
Description of Proposal:
This threshold deterrnination analyzes fhe environmerrtal impacts associated with fhe
following adions,which are so closely related to each other that they are in efFed a single
action:
1. The adoption of the Kent Schooi District 2015 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by
the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District.
2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent
Sc.hool District 2015 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capita(Facilities Plan Element of the
King County Comprehensive Plan.
3. The amendment of tlie Comprehensive Pian of the City of Ker�t to include the
Kent School District's 2015 Capitai Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilitles Plan Elemerrt
of tfie Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent.
4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Pian of the City of Covington to indude
the Ker�t School District's 2015 Capital Facilities Pian as part of the Capital Facilities Plan
Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington.
5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the
Kerit School District`s 2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capitai Facilities Plan ElemeM
of the Comprehens'Ne Plans of the City of Renton.
6. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the
Kent Schooi District's 2015 Capitai Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element
of the Comprehensive Pians of the City of Aubum.
7. This proposal may also invoNe amendmeM of Comprehensive Plans of the Cifies
of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent Sc�ool District 2015
Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities elemeM of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive
Plan.
1
Proponent: Kent School Distrid No. 415
LoCation of the Proposal:
The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 70 sguare miles. The City of
Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, ReMon,Aubum, BlackDiamond, Maple Valley, and
SeaTacfall within the DistricYs boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County.
Lead Agency:
Kent School Districc No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that 4he proposal does not pose a
probable signifcaM adverse impact to the environment An environmerrtal impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after a review of
the compieted environmental chedclist and other infortnation on file with Me lead agency. This
inforrnation is available to the public upon request.
This Determination of Non-sign�cance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-34d(2). The
lead agency will not act on this proposai for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be
submitted by 4:00 p.m., July 24, 2015. The responsible official wiil reconsider the DNS based
on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if sign�cant adverse impacts ere likely,
witFidraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final aftet the expiration of the comment
deadline.
Responsibie Official:
I -�
D . Richard A Stedry,
Chief Business Officer for
Ker�t Schooi District No. 415
Telephone: (253) 373-7295
Address: 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No. 6890 which can be obtained
from Dr. Richard A Stedry, Ghief Business Officer, Kerit School District No. 415,
12033 SE 256th Street#A-600, Kent,Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11-
680 and RCW 43.21C.075.
Date of Issue: July 10, 2015
Date Published: July 17, 2015
2
EPIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
UPDATED 2015
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist.
Purpose of Checklist:
GovemmeMal agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental
impacts aF you�proposal are signficant Thi§ ir�fortnation is atso helpful to detertnine 'rf available
avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable
significarrt impacts or'rf an environmerrtal impacf statement will be prepared to further analyze
the proposal
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmerrtal checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge.You may
need to consuit with an agency specialist or private consukant for some questions. You may use
"not appiicable°or"does not apply"only when you can expiain why k does not apply and not
when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional
studies re�rts. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the
SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on d'rffereM parcels of land.Attach any additional infortnation that will help
describe your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which you submit this
checklist may agk you to explain youranswers orproyide additional information reasonably
related to detertnining 'rf the�e may be significant adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead qgencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Addkional infortnation may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of
adverse impacts.The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of
infortnation needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold
detertnination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the compieteness and accuracy of the
checklist and other supporting documerrts
Use of checklist for nonprojed proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the
applicable parts of sedions A and B pius the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR IdONPROJECT
ACTIONS(part D). Please completely answer ail questions that apply and note that the words
"project,""applicaM,"and"property or site"shouid be read as"proposai,""proponeM," and
"affected geographic area," respectively. The Iead agency may exclude(for non-projects)
3
questions in PaR B- Environmental Elements—that do not conVibute meaningfully to the
analysis of the proposal
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of p�oposed project, if applicable:
The adoption of a six-year Capitai Facilities Plan by the Kent School District. The
Comprehensive Plans of King CouMy, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Rerrton,
City of Aubum and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have
been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School Disfict 2015 Capital Faafities
Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Elemer�t of the Comprehensive Plan for each
jurisdiction. A copy of the Capital Facili[ies Plan is availabie for review in the Kent
School Disfict Business Services Department.
2. Name of applicant:
Kent Schooi District No. 415.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Kent Schooi Di§trict No.415
12033 SE 256th Street #A-600
Kerrt,WA 98030-8843
Contact Person: Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer
Telephone: (253)373-7295
4. Date checklist prepared: July 10, 2015
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Kent ScFwol District No.415
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
The 2015 Kent School District Capital Facilfties Plan is scheduled to be f.orvvarded to
King County, Gities of Kent, Covington, Renfon, Aubum, Maple Valley, Black Diamond,
and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The
Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annualiy. Site-spec�c projects have been or will
be subject to project-specific environmental review.
7. Do you have any pians for future add'hions, expansion, or further activ'�ty related
to ar conneded with fhis proposal? If yes, explain.
The Capital Faciiities Plan reviews proposed classroom addition at Neely-O'Brien
Elemerdary School, and proposed construction of a new school that is iMended to
4
Eariy Leaming Center and proposed construction of a new school that is intended to
replace the current Covington Elementary Schooi. The expanded use of portabies is
planned to alieviate overcrowding at elemeMary schools.
8. List any environmental infortnation you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directiy related to this proposal.
The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal
proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly aifecting the property covered by your proposai?
if yes, euplain.
No.
10. List any govemment approvais or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Aubum will review and approve the
CapRal Facilities Plan for the purposes of impac4 fee ordinances and wiil need to adopt
the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive
Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Aubum. Cities of Mapie
Valiey, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the
purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an
amendment to the Capital Facili4ies element of their Comprehensive Plans.
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are severel questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat
those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to inGude additional '
specfic ir�formation on project description.)
This is a non-project action. This proposal invoives the adnp4ion of the Kent School
District 2015 Capital FaalRies Plan for the purpose of pianning the facilities needs of the
District and for inctusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment
of the Comprehensiye Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of
Renton, City of Aubum, City of Black Diamond, City of SeaTac and City of Maple Valiey.
A copy of the Capitat Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business
Services Department office.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, inciuding a street address if any, and
section,township, and range, 'rf known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the sfte(s). Provide a legal description, site pian,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.While you should submR
any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
5
The 2015 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District. The District inGudes
an area of approximately 70 square miles.The Cky of Covington,and portions of the
Cities of Kerrt,Au6um, Renton, Biack Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of
unincorporated King County fail witnin the baundaries of the Kent School Dis4rict.
B. ENVIRON6AENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth �
a. General description of the site (circle one}: Flat, roiling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and
gradients, including ail of those listed. Specific topographic characteristics will be
ideM�ed during the planning and permit process for eacfi capital proJect.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percerrt slope)?
Spec�c slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process
for each capital project.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the class�cation of agricultural soiis,specify them and note
any prime farmland.
Specific soil types will be ident�ed during the planning and pertnit process for each
capital project:
d. Are fhere surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicin'ity?
If so, describe.
Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District. Specific soil Iimitations on
individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review.
e. Describe the purpose,type, total area and approximate quantities and total
affected area of any filling orgrading proposed. Indicate sou.roe of fiil.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan wiU be subjectfo project-
spec�c environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed
grading projects, as well,as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will
6e identified as appropriate to each project.
f. Could erosion occur as a resuR of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally
describe.
{t is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construdion projects currently
proposed in fhe Capital Facilities Plan. Individual projects and their erosion impacts
will be evaluated on a site-spec�c basis. Individuai projeds will be subject to
environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal.
6
g. About what percent of the sfte will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for exampte, asphalt or buiidings?)
PerceMage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and wili be
addressed during projed-specfic environme�tal review.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, A
any:
Erosion poterdial on individual project sites will be addressed during project-spec'fiic
environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be
met
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during
construdion operation and maintenance when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantifies if knovm.
Various emissions, many construdion-related, may resuR from individual projeets.
Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-speafic environmerrtal review.
Please see the Suppiemerital Sheet for Non-project Actions.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal9 If so, generally describe.
Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-speciflc
environmental review.
c. Proposed measures to reduGe or control emissions or other impads to air, if any:
Plans for individual projects inGuded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be
subject to environmental re4iew and relevant looal approval processes, including
obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individua� projects are
formally praposed. Please see fhe Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Acfions.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District The
surFace water regimes and flow pattems have been or wili be researched and
incorporated in the design of each individual project.
2) Will the projed require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
�
Some projects may require work near these described waters. Individual
projeds in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and
local approvai requirements at the time the project is formaity proposed.
3) Estimate the amount of fili and dredge material that would be piaced in or
removed from surhace water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill materiai.
Information with respect to placement or removal of fiil or dredge material will be
addressed at the time of projed-specific environmental review. Applicabie local
regulations have been or will be satisfied.
4) Will the proposal require surtace water withdrawals or diyersions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quanfities if IinorVn.
Ar�y surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed
during project-speafic environmental review.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
Each capital facilities project, 'rf located in a floodplain area, will be required to
meet applicable local regulations for flood areas.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of wastg materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
Specific ir�formation regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be
addressed during project-specific environmental review. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, from a weli for drinking water or other
purposes? If so, give general description of the well, proposed uses and
approximate quar�tities withdrawn from the well.WII water be discharged to
groundwateR GiVe general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
�ndividual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground
weter resources. Each projed will be evaluated during project-speafic
environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or wiil be satisfied.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for exampie: Domestic sewage; industriai,
containing the foilowing chemicals . . .; agricuRural; etc.). Describe the general
size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
a
served ('rf applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed
during sfte-specific, project-level environmentai review.
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(induding storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, rf any(include quantifies, 'rf known). Where will this water
flow7 Wiil this water flow into other wafers? If so, describe.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm
water runoff consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental review
and applicable local regulations.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surFace waters? If so,generally
describe.
Individual projects inGuded in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying
environmental impads and will be subject to appropriate review and local
regulations prior to construction. Iriforrnation regarding waste materiais wili be
presented at the Gme of such review. Please see the Supplementai Sheet for
Non-project Adions.
3) Does the proposal after or othervvise affed drainage pattems in the vicinity of
the site? If so, describe.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying
dreinage pattem consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental
review and applicable iocal regufations
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or wiil be developed
on a proje.ctspec�ic basis in coopera6on with the appropriate jurisdiction.
4. Plants:
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the sfte:
_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, otHer
ShNb3
_ QMSS
_ pasture
9
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that th d agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: ��� __
Dr. Richard A. Stedry—�
ChiefBusiness Officer
Date Sutimitted: July, 10, 2105
19
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of
activities likely to resutt from the proposal, would affect the Rem at a greater iMensity or
at a faster rate than ff the proposal were not implemeMed. Respond briefly and in
general tertns.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase dis�arge to water, emissions to air,
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed,
and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more
likely. Additional impertneable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks,
access roads and playgrouniis wiil increase stortn water runoff,which could erner
surface or ground water. Emissions to air could resuk from heating systems,
emergency generators and other equipment, and from add'Rional car and bus fips to
and from the school for students and faculty. Any emissions resulting from this Plan
should not require the production,storage, or release of toxic or hazardous
substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuei or gasoline for
emergency generating equipmeM. Noise may result from additionai traffic and from
concentrating severai hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after
schooi and during recesses.
To the e�ctent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur,these
impacts would also increase somewhat, but R is not possibie to quantify those
impacts at this time. The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution
of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the
school.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Faalities implementing the Plan have been or wili be evaluated at the project spec�c
level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly. Storm water deteMion and runoff w'ilI
meet appiicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of
actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System ("NPDES") permitting requiremerrts. Discharges to air will be minimal, and
will meet any applicable requiremeMs of the Puget Sound Air Pollution CoMrol
Authority. Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requiremerrts.
20
2. How wouid the proposal be likely to affect plants, animais, fish, or marine life?
The Plan itseff will have no impact on these elements of the environmerrt. Depending
on the particular ske, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of piants and
loss of animal h_abitat. To the extent residential development is allowed, additional
area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for aninials. There are not likely to be
any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in
streams and rivers could occur due to increased resideMiai development. These
impacts haye been or wiil be addressed in more detail during projectspecific
environmental review when appropriate.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve piants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Individual projects will be evaluated and mftigated appropriately on a project-spe�c
basis, but specific mfigation proposals cannot be identified at this time.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Any actual projects resuRing from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical
energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would
consume petroleum based fuels. Reduced traffic resulting from canstrubtion of
ano4her neighbofiood school may also reduce amour�ts of fuei conaumed, but it is
not possible to quantify such redudion in consumption at this time. Tliese impacts
have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental
review when appropriate.
Proposeti measures to.Protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicabie energy efficiency
standards.
4. How would the propasal be likely to use or affect environmentaliy sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study)for govemmeMal protecGon; such as
pa�lcs,wiltlemess, wildand scenic rivers, threatened or endangered speGes habitat,
historic or culturai sites, wetiands, floodplains, or prime fartnlands?
The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on
these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other development mede
possible by this Pian would affect sensitive areas.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
No spe�c measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have
been or will be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan
w'ill be coordinated with King CouMy, Cities of Kerrt, Covington, Renton,Aubum,
Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Maple Vailey as part of the Growth Mariagement Act
process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas.
To 4he extertt the School Distrid's facilities pianning process is part aF the overall
growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be
protected.
u
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with
existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implemeM the Plan
will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public '
services and utilities?
This proposai should not create substantial new demands for transportation. The
projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian may create an increase in tratfic near
new District facilides but also reduce traffic by creatirig the oppoRunity for more
students to walk to a closer schaol.The construdion of the facilities inGuded in the
Capital Faalities Plan may resuk in minor increases in the demand for public services
and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities.
None of these impads are likely to be signfipnt The impacts on transportation and
public services and utifities of the projects inGuded in the Capitel Facilities Plan will
be addressed du�ing project-level review when appropriate.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict withaocal, state, or federal laws ,
or requiramerrts for the protectio� of the environment. I
The Ker�t School Distriet Capital Facilities Plan wiil not conflict with any laws or
requiremeMs for the protection of the environmer�t.
22
POLICY & TEXT AMEfVDMENT (PT #5)
INCORPORATE CITY OF AUBURN CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN 2016-2021
1 '
r
*
cm oF ��.�T Memorandum
��
` WASHINGTON
To: Planning and Community Deyelopment
From: Finance Department, �apital Projects
�r
Date: November 10,2015 �
Re: DRAFT 6Year Capital Facilities Plan(2016-2021)
Please find attached tiie final copy of out 20162021 Draft Capital Facilities Pian(CFP), the capital facilities
element of the Citys Comprehensive Plan. For questions or additional information on the preparation of
this document, please contact Consuelo Rogel at (253) 804-5023 or cropelCa�auburnwa.qov. Questions
regarding sp'ecfic projects contained in the dooument sfiould be directed to the department managing ttie
project(s).
A capital facilities plah is one o,f the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington's Growth
Management Act (GMA), The GMA requires that a capital facilities pian inolude an inventory of exisjing
capital facilities (showing location& and capacities), a forecast of future needs fo� such capital facilities,
proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to
finance caqital facilities with itlentfied sou�ces of funding: The attaclied GFP satisfies the GMA requirement
for a Capital Facilities Element as part of the Comprehensiye Plan.
The following projects have been added, removed or revised from the previous year's CFP (2015-2020)
due to the creation of new projects,completion of projects or changes in project titles and/or priorities:
Water,Sewer,Storm Utilities
Additions
• Intertie Booster Pump Station Improvements (Water, page 105)
• Algona Well 1 Decommissioning (Water, page 106)
• Annual Distritiution System Improvements Program (Water, page 107)
• F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Water, page 122&Sewer, page 142)
• M Street SE Storm Improvements (Water, page 123 8 Sewer, page 143)
• Reservoir Repair and Replacements (Water, page 124)
• Pipeline Asset Management StOdy (Water, page 125)
• 2015 Sewer Repair and Replacement (Sewer, page 134)
• Mantiole Ring and Cover Replacement (Sewer, page 135)
Page 1 of 4
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGWED
I .
Water,Sewer,Storm Utilities
Additions(continued)
• Siphon Assessment (Sewer, page 137)
• Pump Station Condition Assessment (Sewer, page 138)
• Large Diameter Pipe Assessment (Sewer, page 139)
. Inflow and InfilVation Study (Sewer, page 140)
• Vegetation Sorting Facility (Storm, page 161)
• West Hiil Annezation Area Drainage Improvements (Storm, page 165)
• 30"'Street NE Area Flooding Phasel B (Storm,page 766)
• Annual Citywide Storm Pipeline and Replacement (Stortn, page 167)
. 23"'Street SE Storm Improvement (Storm, page 168)
Deletions
• Well 1 Improvements(Water)
• Well 4 Power&Chlorination(Water)
• Lakeland Hilis Reservoir 5 Improvements(Water)
• Comprehensive Plan(Water)
. Valley AC Main Replace(Water)
. BNSF Utility Crossing(Water,Sewer&Storm)
• SCADA Upgrades(Water)
• Autiurn Way South Flooding Improvements Phase 2(Water, Sewer 8 Storm)
• Aubum Way South—Dogwood to Fir(Water)
. AubL�n Way South—Fir to Hemlock(Water)
• Bypass at 2ntl and G Street SE(Storm)
• Hoiyard Road Impro4ement(Storm)
• M&O Storm Drainage Impro4ements(Storm)
• 30'"Street NE Area Flooding-Phase 1 (Storm)
• CompostingFacility(Storm)
• Annexafion Area Small Storm improvement(Stortn)
Trensportation Projects(see TIP for further details)
Additions
• AWS Improvements(Hemlock to Academy Dr. SE) (page 33)
• C Street SW&15'"Street SW intersection Improvements (page 41)
Page 2 of 4
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGWED
`\
/
. 124"'Avenue SE&SE 248�'SVeet Intersection Safety Imp. (page 47)
• A SVeet SE'&Lakeland Hills Way SE Int.Safety and Capacity Imp. (page 51)
• Stewart Road(Lake Tapps Parkway Gorridor) (page 66)
. M Street SE 8 29�" SVeet SE Intersection Safety Improvements (page 68)
• R Street SE&21�Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements (page 70)
• Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements (page 72)
• Downtown TransR Center Access Improvements (page 76)
Deletions
• 8'"Street NE&SE 104�'Street Intersection Improvements
• Autium Way South and M Street SE Intersection Improvements
. A SVeet SE Non-Motorized And Access Impro4ements
• BNSF 3'"Rail Ezpansion Roaduvay Improyements
• South 277"'Wetland Mitigation
• 37"'St NW&B St NW Railroad Crossing Safety Impro4ements
• A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements
• Interurban Trailhead Improvements
Parks,Arts$Recreation ProjecLs
Deletions
• Fenster LeVee Setback, Phase 2B
Community Improvements/Generel Municipal Buildings
Additions
• Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (page 209j
• Purchase of King County Public Heal4h Building (page 218)
Deletions
• M&O Small Equipment and Tool Storage Building
• 8'"Street NE&C SVeet NW ITS Improvements
• Les Gove Campus Master Plan
• Main Street Streetscape Urban Design
• City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfguration
Page 3 of 4
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
i .
,
n��ort
Additions
. West Helicopter Parking Pads, Facilities and Access Road (page 229)
• Runway 16/34 Seal Coat (page 230)
Deletions
• South T-Hangar Row 3 EnGosure
• Obstruction Survey for NexGenIGPS Approach
. Wildl'rfe Hazard Assessment
• General Repair&Maintenance
Page 4 of 4
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
City ofAuBurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
�
CITY �F �` �
�
* -�' �
-� WASHINGTON
6�
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
(2016 - 2021)
Adopted by Ordinance No. xxxx, December xx; 2015 as part of the
City of Aubur.n Comprehensive Plan
City of Auburn
25 West Main
Aubum, WA 98001
(253) 931-3000
vwvw.auburnwa.qov
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
� �. .
CITY OF �
*
� MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2016 — 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary.................................................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction
Purpose................................................................................................................................... 7
Statutory Requirement for Gapital Facilities Elements...�....�:....:�:....�:.....::....:::...:�:....�:::..:.::...: 7
Concurrency and Level of Service...................................................................,.....................:. 8
Implementation.,....,:...:.:.....�:....,.....,......:.....,.....,...........,.....,......,..........:........:....::.....,:....,,:.... 8
2. Goals and Policies
1. Capital Facilities Response to Growth..:�.....::...�.;:.,..:............�....,;..,..�.:....�:;...:::.....�:....:....:11
2. Financial Feasibility........................................................................................... ...11
.............
3. Public Health and Environment.:.......:....::....�......,.....�....,:.....,....�::.....::....:,:....:�....:,......�....13
4. Consistency With Regional Pianning ....,, ,....,... ....................... ...,.....,.......,,...16
3. CapitaJ Improvements
Introduction .............................................................................................................................15
Transportation...�....:�:...,:....:�....,�......:.....:.....:....:�.....�:....,.....,.....�:....�::...:�:....,�::...:�:,...:�:...:::...17
Arterial Street (1.02) Capital Projects ...... ......... .....,..._ _ ..22
,..
Local Street(103) Capital Projects......... ......... ......... .......:. :........ ..�...83
Street.Preservation Fund(1.Q5) Capital Projects.�...................,,.,,:,......,..............,...,..,.....,..85
Water ..................................................... .........
......... ......... ......... ..........93
SanitarySewer..::....�:....�.....�:....�:....::.....,.....�:....�.....�:...:.�...:::....:�:....�:....�:::...:�::...:�:...:�:::..:�:..127
Storm Drainage ...................................... ....................,......, _ _ .145
_ _ .......... ......... .........
ParKs. Arts arid Recreation......................................................................................................169
General Municipal Buildings:::...�:....�::....�.....�:....::....:�:...�;....�::....::...::::.....�....:::.....�:....,:.:...,:..195
Community Improvements ......... _ ......... ......... ......... ......... ...,...,, .,.......203
Airport....................................................................................................... : 219
..: .. .
Gemetery .,�:.. .�:...., :....�:...........:.... ....�. .:;......:......:....: .,,, .:,.233
PoliceDepartment...................................................................................................................235
Valley Regional Fire Authority..........::...........:.............:....:....::......:....:..............:......:....�::..._:..237
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
� �
CITY OF �
� .
� � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plarc
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A capital facilities element is one of the comprehensive plan elements requi�ed by
V1lashington's Growth Management Act (GMA). Capital facilities generally haye long useful
lives, significant costs and tend fo not be mobile.
The GMA reguires that capital facilities elements include an inventory of existing capital
facilities showing locations and capacities, a forecast of future needs for such capital
fiacilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities and at
le.ast a six-y.ear plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding, The
GMA also requires that the land use element 6e rea§§essed if probable funding falls sfiort
of existing needs.
This document is the City's six-year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). l'he CFP, in conjunction
with other Gity adopted documents, satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities
Element. It addresses one of the GMA's basic tenets: to provide ade:quate facil'ifies to
support development in accoriiance with Ibcally adopted level of senrice standards.
This CFP wil(enable the City to:. (1) make informed decisions about its inyestment of public
dollars, and (2) make timely decisions about maintaining level of service in accordance with
this CFP and other adopted plans:
_. __ .
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT
This CFP consists of the following:
Ghapter 1. Introduction Purpose of CFP, statutory requi�ements,
methodology.
Chapter 2. Goals and Policies Goals and policies related to the
provision of capital facilities.
Chapter 3. Capitel Improvements Proposed capital projects, which include
the financing plan and reconciliation of
project capacity to level of service (LOS)
standards.
?his GFP is a companion document to the Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 5). The Gapital Facilitie.s Elemenf of 4he Auburn
Comprehensi4e Plan identifies the City's planning approach and policy framework for the
provision of capital facilities. This CFP proyides the background inventory, identifies
proposed projects and establislies the six-year capital facilities plan for financing capital
facilities.
The comprehensive plan contains timeframes which a�e the intended Framewo�k for future
funding decisions and within which future actions and decisions are intended to occur,
However, these timeframes are estimates; depending on factors involveii in the processing
of applications and project work, and the avaifability of funding, the timing may change from
1
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
the included timeframes. The framework does not represent actual commitments by the
City of Aubum that may depend on funding resources ayailable.
GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS
In planoing for capital facilities, contemplation of futu�e growth needs fo be consiiiered: The
CFP is based on the following City population forecast:
Year Population
2014 74;630
2015 75,545
2021 85,912
_
The popul@tion forecasts are based on information from the State of Washington Offce of
Financial Management (OFM) as well as estimates developed by the City of Aubum
Planning and Community Development Department,
CARITAL COSTS OF FACILITIES
B'ased ori the anely§is of capital improvements contained in this document, the cost of Ci.ty-
owned and.managed capital improvements for2016-2021 is summarized`as follows:
Type of Fa.cility 2U16:-2021
Transportation -:Arterial (102) $ 123,088,541
Transportation -Local (103) 9,600,000
Transporlation - Street (10$) 15,762,850
Water 35,758;154
Sanitary Sewer 12.,751,000
Storm Drainage 17,685,618
Parks, Arts & Recreation 20;910,000
Gene�a/Municipal Buildings 4,992,223
Communitylmprovements 5,724,670
Arrpo�t 8,078,650
Total $ 254,351,706
2
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES
The financing plan forthe citywide capital improvements includes:
- -_
Funding Source 2016:=2021 CapitaC Faeility
Grants 79,143,903 T2nsportation
(Inoludes grant funding that has not 4,605,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation
been secured) 1,150,000 Community Improyements
Z,541,717 Airport
Use�FeesTFundBalance - 21;338,-154 - Wafer
13,151,000 Sewer
17,832,776 Stortn Drainage
150,000 Community Impro.ements
1,025,000 Equipment Rental
536,9.33 Airport
Arterial Street Fund 4,657,000 Transportation
Arterial Street Preservafion Fund 401,750 Transportation
Bond Proceeiis 14,520,000 Water
252,842 Storrn D�ainage
6,000,000 Parks, Arts 8 Recreation
Municipal Paiks Fund__ _435,000 Pa�lc's, Arts � Recreation
Property Tax 735,000 Parks,ARs & Redreation
Sales Tax 8,700,000 Transportation
UtilityTax -- - 13,307,850 Trdnsportatio_n_ __._.
- _ -
Mitigation/Impact Fees 15,809;214 Transportation
910,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation
176,570 Community ImpFo6ements
REET 1 1,184,219 Parks, Arts 8 Recreation
3,967;223 _ Generai.,Municipal Buildings
— - _
REET2 3,573,100 Cortimunitylinpro�ements
200,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation
300,000 Transportation _ ._ _ _
_. ._ _ .
Other Sources 25,231,674 Transportation
250,000 Community Impro�ements
7,265,781_ Parks, Arts.&Recreation
_ -
Total $ 254,351,706 - --
3
City ojAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
The forecasted impacts of new capital facilities on the City's future qperating budgets
(2019-2022) are as followx
BudgetYear. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
7 Trarrsporfadon $ 88,707 $ 95,807 $105�,807 $188,807 $258,857 $258,857 $ 994,842
2 Water - - 600 600 600 �600 2,400
3 Sanitary§ewer - - - - - - -
4 Storm.Orainage - - - - - - -
5 SoNd Waste - - - -� - �-� -�
6 Paiks,Art;a�Recreation 171,000 171,000 183,000 183,000 183,000. 183,000 1�,074,000
7 Ge�ro/Mun/clpa/Bufldings - - - - - - -
8 CommunkyhnprovemeMs " - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000
9 A"vP� . - - - - - -
10 CemeMry - - - - - - -
11 Golf Course - - - - - - -
12 8enior CeMei - - - - - - -
13 Police Depertment - - - - - - -
14 Fre ProMetion - - - - - - -
Total 5257,707 5288,807 -$299,407 5382pOZ �5452,457� T452,457 �52111,242
Projed summary details are located on the following pages:
Transportation page 92
Water page 126
F'arks 8 Recreation page 191
Community Improvements page 217
4
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP
Based on the proposed six-year capital projects and the projected population increase of
10,658 (13.7%) between 2015 and 2021, the LOS for the following City-owned public
facilities wiil change as follows:
The LOS for the following facilifies will be increased as a result of the CFP, comparing fhe
2015 LOS to the projected 2021 LO.S.
_. _ -- --- - - _ . _ _ _ _
CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2015 LOS 2021 LOS
(Projec.ted
Gemei�ry Burial Plots Per 1,000 Pop. 27.13 40.44
CommunityParks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 2.96 3.12
Linear Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.23 0:24
Neighborhood Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.77 0.79
The LOS for the following facilities will be maintained as a result of the CFP.
CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2015 LOS 2021 LOS
— -_ _ - - (Projected
Roads _ __ Volume/CapacityRatio D" D"
Ariport_ _ .- --- .. . _ %_A�r Opera6oris Supp`ort _ 100% 100%.
Sanrtary Sewer Residen6a'I GPCPD (Note_1) 171_00 171.00
Storm Drainage N/A
Water ResidenNal GPCPD (Note 1) 230:00 230.00
No[e L• GPCPD=Gallons per Customer per Day
The LOS for the following facilities will be decreased as a result of the CFP, comparing the
2015 LOS to the projected 2021 LOS.
CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2015 LOS 2021 LOS
_ - -- _. _�Projected
Fire ProtecBoh Apparatus per 1,000 Pop. , 0:23 0'21
_ ...._
General'Municipal Buildings Sq. Ft.per 1,000 Pop. 3;895.98 3,585:62
_ _ .____ _.
Open Space Acres per1,000 Pop: 5J2 4.50
Senior Center Sq.Ft.pe�1,000 Pop. 154.43 135:8b
Special Use A_�eas _ Acres per 1,000.Pop. 3.37 2.96
LeVel of Service (LOS) is a common measure used to determine the efficiency or
effectiveness of services. For the City of Aubum, LOS targets serves.as a means to as.sess
the adequacy of public facilities in meeting the needs of the population for wtiich it serves.
5
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
For example, in the case of park space, when there is an increase in population without a
coRe"sponding increase in park acreage, the LOS unit of ineasure (acres per 1;000
population) will. decline, indica#ing a pote,ntial need to increase the total amount of park
acreage to keep pace with population growth. On the other hand, a slight. increase in
population, coupled with a large increase in facilities, will result in an increased LOS: For
example, facilities such as buildings orburial plots may be constructed o.r expanded to keep
pace with anticipated population growth. While this will have the effect ofiincreasing LOS in
the short-tgrm, in the longer-term, the LOSwill gradually decline to the targeted level based
on forecasted population. The impact of poPulation growth to the LOS for facilities inrill vary
depending on the type of facility and long range planning by the City.
CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOGUMENTS
- _ __
Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) are principally the
comprefiensive plans for the various public facilities included in this GFP. These individual
comprehensiye plans provide detailed identifca4ion of projects and identify their(projects)
proposed funding sources.
City documents include:.
• City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Element(2014);
• City Municipal Airport AAaster Plan Update (2012-2032);
• City Comprehensive Water Plan (2015);
• City Comprehensive TranspoRation Plan (2012)and$ix Year Transportation
Improvement Program (2016-2021);
• City Comprefiensive Drainage Plan (2015);
• City ComprehensiVe Sewer Plan (4015);
. City 2015-16 Biennial Budget and 2014 Annual Financial Report; and;
• Masterplan update for parks, aswell as numerous otherp.lanning and financial
documents.
All documents are aDailable for public inspection at the City of Aub.Lrn,
6
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
The Gapital Facilities Plan (GFP) is a 6-year plan (20162021) for capital improvementsthat
supp:ort the City of Auburn's cutrent and futuregrowtFi.
In this plan, funding for general govemment projects is identified. To maintain consistency
with inaiVidual master and utility comprehensive pians, applicable projects in the 6-year
window of those master/utility pfans are included in this CFP: The CFP also identifies LOS
standards, where applicable, for each public facility.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL_FACILITIESELEMENIS
RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d) requi�es that the comprehensive plan capital facilities element
include "a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projeeted funding
capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes." RCW
36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have `probable funding" to pay for capital
facility needs, or else the City must"reassess the land use element."
In addition, the capital facilities element must includg the location and capacity of existing
facilities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed locations and capacities. The State
Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accomplished for
watersystems, sanitary sewersystems,stortn water fac'ilifies, schools, parks and re.creation
facilities, police and fire protection facilities.
TFie GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital facilities. As a
result; public facilities in the CFP should be based on quantifiable, objective measures of
capacity such as traffic volume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In
sorrie instances, though, level of senrice may best be expressed in temis of qualitative
statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility. Factors that influence local level
of serv'ice standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, national and local
standards, and Federal and State mandates.
To b:e effectiVe, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines
suggest that the CFP be updated at least every two years: In 2007, the City transitioned to
- _. _
a biennial budget. With this in mind, the City will follow these guidelines and uPdate the
CFP at least every two years, incorporating the capital facilities improvements in the City's
biennial budget process.
7
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CONGURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
Concurrency
The GMA requires that jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place dr aVailable within
a specified time frame when development occurs. This concept is called concurrency.
Under the GMA, concurrency is re:qui�ed for transporta4ion facil'if'ies and is recommended by
the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer.
Concurrency'has a direct relationship to level of service. The importance of concurrencyto
capital facilities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the level of§ervice
for a capital facility below the locapy adopted minimum: The level of service is unique for
each type of facility and is presented in the subsequent sections.
Explanation of Level of`Service
As indicated earlier, the GMA-requires that.level of service be established for certain
tran"sportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrericy tb development proposals.
The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of level of service standards for other
capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public fac'il'ities.
Typically, measures of level of service are expressed as ratios offiac.ility capacity to
derriand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1 lists generic examples of level of service
measures for some capital facilities:
TABLE 1-1
Sample Level of Service Measurements
Type of Facilit Sample Level of Service Measure
Genera/ Municipal Buildings Square feet per 1,000 population
Pa�ks Acres per 1,000 population
Roads and Streets Ratio of actual volume fo design capacity
Sewer/ Water Gailons per customer per day
The need for capital facilities is largely determined by a community's adopted LOS
standards and whether or not the community has forrrialiy designated capital facilities, other
than transportation, as necessary for devetopment to meet the concurrency test. The CFP
itself is therefore largely influenc.ed by the selection of the level of service standards. Level
of service.standards are measuresof the qualityof life in tFie City. The,standards.should be
based on the City's vision of itsfiutureand its values.
IMPLEMENTAI'ION
- — -. .. . _
Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. The CFP is
sensitive to funding and revenue availability and therefore needs to be constantly monitored
against va�iations in available resources. To fac'ilitate itsimplementation, the CFP should
be kept current.
8
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
Update of Capifal Facilities Plan
Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFP current is to update it regularly so the six-
year plan is a rolling CFP. Agein, the State recommends that the CFP be updated at least
biennially.
The City of Auburn will seek to update the CFP at least biennially in conjunction with the
budget process. Future updates will consider:
A. Revision of population projections, including annexations;
B. Update of invento.ry of public facili4ie,s;
C. Update of costs ofpublic facilities;
D. Update of public facilities requirements analysis (actual leyel of service
compared to adopted standards);
E. Update of revenue forecasts;
F. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next six fiscal
years;and,
G. Update analysis of financial capacity.
Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to level of service standards; capital
projects, and/or the financing plan sources of revenue are all actions that can keep the CFP
cur�ent and relevant to City decision-making.
9
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
� �
CI�'� O� �
� F -
' �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
�o
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 2
GOALS AND POWCIES
This chapter ideritifies goals and policies specific to the City's provision of capital facilities.
Goal 1 Provide a variety of re.sponses to. the demands of growth on public
facilities.
Policy 1,1 Establish land use pattems that optimize the use of public facilities.
Policy 1.2 Provide additional public facility capacity when existing facilities are used to
their maximum level of efficiency (consisfent with adopted standards forlevel
of service).
Policy 1.3 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an
efficient manner.
Policy 1.4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program>
1.4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.27.095, 58.17.033 or58.17.170.
1.4.2 Development that creates no added impact on public facilities.
1.4.3 Expansions of existing development that were disclosed and tested
for concurrency as part of the original application.
Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that.are within the ability of the City to
fund or within the City's authority to require others to provide.
Policy 2.1 Establish level of service standards that are achievable with fhe financing
plan of this Capital Facilities Plan.
Policy 2.2 Base the fnancing plan for pubiic facilities on realistic estimates of current
local revenues anii external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be
received by the City.
Policy 2.3 Match revenue sources to capital projects on the basis of sound fiscal
policies.
2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs through utility enterprise
funds, based on user fees and grants. Public facilities included in
u4ilities are sewer, solid was4e, storm drainage, and wa#er:
2.3.2 Where feasible pursue joint venture facility construction,
constructiorr timing, and other facility coordination measures forCify
provided facilities, as weli as with school disl[icts antl othe�
potential partners in developing public facilities.
2,3.3 The Gi.ty shall continue to assist fhrough direct parEicipation, LIDs
and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially
feasible.. Where funding is available, the City may Participa4e in
developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to
the extent that the improvements benefit.the broaderpublic interest,
and are consistent with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan.
Policy 2.4 If the projected funiiing is inadequate to finance needed public facilities and
11
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
utilities based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth,
the City will do one or more of the following to achieve a balance betirveen
available revenue and needed pulilic facilities: -
2.4.1. Lower the level of serv'ice standards;
2,4.2 Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources;
2.4:3 Adopt new so.urces of revenue;
2.4.4 Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense;
and/or
2.4.5 Amend the Land Use Element ta �educe the need for additional
public facilifies.
Policy 2.5 Both existing and futu�e developrSient will pay fo�the costs ot needed capital
improvements.
2.5.1 Ensure that ezisting development pays for capital improvements
that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or
sll of the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Ezisting
development may also pay a portion of the cost of capital
improvements ne.e.ded by future development. Existing
developrimenYs paymerits may take the form of user fees, charges
for services, special assessments and taxes.
2.5.2 Ensure that futu�e development pays a proportionate sha�e of the
cost of new facilities which it requires. Future development may
also pay a portion of 4he cost to replace obsolete or wom-out
facilities: Future developmenYs payments may take the form of
voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact
fees, mitigatibn paymenfs, capacity fees, dedications of land,
provision of public facilities, and future payments of user's fees,
charges for services, special assessments and ta�ies.
Policy 2.6 The City wiil determine the Priority of public facility capital improvements
using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue sou�ce that
cannotbe used for the highest priority will be used beginning with the highest
priority for which the revenue can legally be expended.
2.6.1 Projects tHat eliminate hazardous conditions.
2.6.2 Refurbishment of existing facilities that contribute to achieving or
maintaining standards for adopted leYel of service.
2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in
level of service for existing demand.
2.6.4 New or expanded facilities that proviiJe the adopted level of service
for new development and retlevelopment during the next six fiscal
years.
2.6:5 Capital improvements that signifcantly reduce the operating cost of
providing a service or facility, or otherwise mitigate impacts of
public facilities on future opera4ing budgets.
12
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities P[an
2.6.6 Capital improvements that contr'ib.ute to stabilizing and developing
the economy of the City.
2.6.7 Project priorities may also involqe additional criteria 4hat are unipue
to each type of public facility, as described in other elements of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 2.7 Ensure that the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility
a�e financially feasible prio�to coristructing the facility.
Goal 3 Protect public healfh, enyironmental quality, and neighborhood
stability and viability tFirough the app�opriate design and insfallation of
public facilities.
Policy 3.1 Promdte conservatidn of energy, water and other natural resources in the
location and design of public facilities.
Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities whereVer
combined sewers may be discovered.
Policy 3:3 Practice efficient and environmentaliy responsible maintenance and
operating procedures.
Policy 3.4 The si4ing, design, construction and improvement of all pubiic buildings shall
be done in fuli compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stability and growth through strategic
irivestments in public facilities and public private/partnerships.
Goal 4 Make the Capitai Facili4ies Plan consistent with ofher elements of the
cortiprehensive plan, and - to the extent feasible - with other city,
county, regional and state adopted plans.
Policy 4.1 Ensu�e that the groinrth and development assumptions used in the Capital
Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of
the comp�eHensive plan.
Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non-city providers of public facilities on a joint program for
maintaining applicable level of service standards, concurrency requi�ements,
funding and construction of public facilities.
Goal 5 Provide public facilities that provide a sense of community that is
inclusive of diverse populations.
Policy 5.1 Contribute to community pride and foster a sense of community 4hrough
provision of pubiic facilities that create a community gathering place for
neighbors, family and friends.
Policy 5.2 Through provision of public facili4ies offer a broad range of actiyities
promoting social interactions especially with new residents.
Policy 5.3 Provide maximum flexibility and multiple uses fhrough design of public
facilities that are adaptable to changing interests.
Policy 5.4 Provide a community center facilify thaYis financiaily feasible, affordable for
participants, anci can generate revenue to offset a portion of the operating
costs.
13
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
� �
CITY OF �
�
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
14
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 3
CAPITALIMPROVEMENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
This CFP includes City capital improvement projects and the financing plan to pay for those
projects. It also coritains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies level of
service standards, where applicable, Each type of City public facility is presented in a
separate subsection that follows a standard forrriat. Tliroughout this section, tables of data
are identified with abbreviations that correspond to the type of facility. For example, Table
1N-1 refers to Table 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreViation cbr�esponiis
to the name of the type of facility.
L NarratiVe Summarv
This is an overview of the data, with sections devbted to Current Facilities, Level of Service,
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing, and Impact on Future Operating Budgets.
2, Inventorv of Facilities (Table X-1)
This is a list of existing capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to level
of serviae), and location. This table also includes any proposed capital projects and the
planned inventory to.tal through De.cember 31, 2021.
3. Caoital Proiects and Financinq Plan (TableX-2. X-2A-and X-2B1
This is a list of capital improvements that identifies existing deficiencies; identifies facilities
needed for future growth, and identifies fhe need to repair or replace obsolete or worn out
facilities through December 31, 2021_ Each list shows the proposed financing plan followed
by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
4. Imoact on Future Ooeratinq Butlqets (Table X3)
This is a list of new capital projects and the forecasted impacts on 4he City's future
operating budgets (2017—2022).
15
Ci.ty of Auburn Draft Capitgl Facilities Plan
� �
CITY OF - �
� � �
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
16
City ojAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ _
TRANSPORTATION
Current Facilities
Roadwavs: The City's street system consists of a nehvork of 216 miles of arterials, collectors,
local streets and alleys. Existing non-motorized facilitigs include a mix of trails, sidewalks,
bicycle lanes and sharrows.
Transit: King County Metro Transit, Sound Transit and Pierce Transit serve the Auburn area.
Aubum is currently served by eight Metro bus routes, two Sound Transit bus routes, and one
Pierce Transit bus route. In addition, twenty Sound Transit"Sounde�' commuter rail trains stop
at 4he Auburn Sta4ion. The Sounder also provides special event service to selected sporting
events. Bus and rail service is supported by park and ride facilities and the Auburn Stafion.
Level of$ervice (LOS)
Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Level of Service (LOS) standards for
both arterials and transit routes. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction's LOS standards be
coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the actual standards and
the methods used are determined by each local Jurisdiction.
Under GMA, the focus is on the perforFnance of the whole road system, not on individual
intersections or roadways. LOS standards are a tool to help keep the transportation system in
balance with the needs of forecast population growth and development. Table T-1a
summarizes the LOS definitions.
17
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
Table T-1a Defnition of Urba,n Street Level of Service (LOS)
- - - _ —
LOS A-describes primarily Tree Bow operations at a�erage traeel speeds, usually abou4 90 percent of the
free flow speed for th_e gieen street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their atiility to maneu�r
wi4hin the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal.
_ _ _ -- - - -- - - --- -- — ---
LOS B-describes reasonably unimpeded operations et a�.erage tra�el speeds, usually about 70 percent of
the free flow speed for the street class. The ability to maneu�:er within the traffic stream is only slightly
restricted, and stopped delays are not bothersome.
LOS C-:describes stable conditions; howeeer, ability to maneueer and change lanes in midblock locations
may tie more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, ad�erse signal coordination, or both may
contribute to lower aoerage traeel speeds of about 50 percent of the free flow speed for the street class.
- - - - -- ____
LOS D-borders on a range in wliich small increas.es in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and
decreases in traoei speed: LOS D may be due to adeerse.signal progression, inappropriate:signal timing,
high wlumes, w some combination of these factors. A�erage fra�el speeds are about 40 percent of frce flow
speed.
LOS E-is characte�ized by significant delays and average tra�el speeds of 33 percent or less of fhe free
flow speed. Such operations are caused by a combination of ad�erse progression, high signal density, high
wluFnes, extensi�e delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
LOS F - is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typioally one-ttiird to one-Tourt6 of
the iree flow speed. Intersec;ion congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high
wlumes.and extensiee queuing.
--- - --- - —
Source: 2010.Hghw ay Capacity Manual,Special Report 209,Trensportation Research Board,Washington,D.C. 2010,.page 10.5
A methodology and set of standards have been drafted for the City of Aubum Comprehensive
Plari. The standariis help determine concu�rency (i.e., balance) between trarisportation and land
use element_s of the Citys Comprehensive Plan, as required by the GMA. The City has four
choices if it finds the standards cannot be met.
• Modify the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to
reduce traffic.
• Construct additional transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new
development.
. Implement Transportatio.n Demand Management (TDM) meagures to increase use of non
single occupant vehicle travel modes.
• Relax the LOS standards; the City can accept lower level of service standards to encourage
further growth and minimize the need for additional transportation facilities.
The fransportation land-use balance will be monitored through the City's Concurrency
Management System as part of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Transportation
concurrency will be ewaluated for key facilities and on a system-wide basis. By having system-
wide and facility-based roadway LOS standards, the City of Aubum can define preliminary
capacity needs.
The City can then identify locations where standards are not anticipated to be met in the future
and identify approp�iate improyements. At 4he project Ievei, the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) process will continue to guide the more specific planning and analysis efforts.
18
City ofAuburn Draft Capz'tal Facilities Plgn
Level of Service Standards
LOS standards can help identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and
when development or growfh will impact system operations. LOS provides a standard below
which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate.
LOS standards can also be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments to the
surrbunding street system. They can assure that all developments are served by a safe;
e�cient and cost-effective street system. They can also be used to disclose impacts, identify
�emedial actions, and apportion costs between public and private sources.
The LOS standards shown in Tabie T-1 b apply to the facility's location and its functional
classification. A more detailed description of the level of service methodology is provided in the
City of Aubum Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2012), page 5-4.
Table T- 1b Draft Roadway Capacity/Gongestion LOS Standards
Roadway/Intersection Maximum V/C RatiolLOS
Arieria! Corridor D`
Signalized lntersectron D
Unslgaalized Infersection -- D" - -
`Unless otherwisaspecified in Chapter 2 of the Glty of Aubum Corrpre6ensive Transpoitation Ran,2072
LOS standards are aiso the basis of an equitable t�affic impact fee system, which require.
developments to pay a portion of the costs for capacity improvements to the transportation
infrastructure.
In 2001, the City implemented a t[affc impact fee program. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate
traffic impacts more equitably while rriakirig the costs of development more predictabie to
developers. In 2007, the City implemented an addifional transportation impact fee to address
the impacts of heavy fruck usage on the City's t�ansportation system. Both fees are updated
annually so that the fees are consistent with current project costs.
Measuring Transportation System Performance
The level of service for street segments or links is analyzed with hnro primary purposes in mind.
First, this site-specific LOS can be used; with the help of a travel d.e.mand model, to evaluate
areas of congestioh within a transportation netwo�k, leading to the development of a long-range
transportation facilities plan. Second, arterial corridor LOS analysis can be used to assess
concurrency or if facilities are meeting the LOS standards.
The City of Auburn currently uses Highway Capacity Manual methodologies to calculate IeVels
of service. For arterials LOS are based on average travel speeds along a defned corridor.
Table T-1 c shows fhe 42 defined street corridors, LOS standards and most.recent calculateii
LOS.
19
City ofAuBurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T'- 1 c
Aubum CorridorLevel of Service
• •
� . . . . . . . . � �•
-1- Auburn Way Nortti--- -- 1Sth-SfNE-- NortRem City Limits -"-- - "D -C/D- -
2 Jki��n WayTlo_r�h___..__� East Main Sf.- `_.._ -. 15fi#f_SENE -___ .�_ _--._, E _.,__ p___._
3 Aubum Way South East MainSt. M St SE D F/E
4_Au{wrn WaySouth.^�.- _
M_St'SE_� '- __—Eastem�iy Limit_s _`__-D_ --__-'G,--
_5_ M_St,/Harv_ey_ .__ _ __ _ _ Au_burn_Way_North East Main St: E C'
'6` M S4./Harvey- . - - East Main'St ' Aubum Way South' D D/G
7 E4ergreen Way Lakeland Hills Way Kersey Way D Futu�e
_8 37th_St NE/NCN West VaIIgY;Hwy_4 I Sf.;NE - " - - D�� _' B/C�
9- 1bth-St NEJNW" � West ValleyHwy' Autium Way North F"" D'
10 Autiunn Ave.7"A"St-. . ` ._ _... :$R 18. .�'_..__�---- .Sot�tliem Ci�L_�mits v .� - -_ � '_� B:--
11 MainSt West Valley_Hwy _ R St_ _ _ _ _ D C,
1_2:lbtfi-St-SW--- --- ---- West Vall'e`y."Hwy ` C'St;SW----- --`- ---p.` -�`-
13 C`St SW Ellingson SR 18 D C/E
14 West Valley Hwy __._ ___,. Northern City Limits�_ .15th_Street_NW' ' _ _._E:_� _B/C___
15 S 277th-Sf - - - -- -- Frontage Rtl: -- - - - 108th-Ave SE - -- -- - E - - -E/B--
16 R=S1�/Kersey:VNay, ""-'� � AuburnWayS . `- - Oraye�Road--_ .`"-�.. D ':: - - AL$-_
17 Lake Tapps Parkway East Valley Hwy. 182nd Ave E D B
18 "A""Sf:SVV/NWf°B"'StT1W" _ .4th_StT11N---" -_ - 5'277th St -�--- -.� - � --- --Future._',
19 Bth.St NElLea Hill Rd_. _ Auburn Way North 132nd Ave SE E _C/B
20 D;SfNW/Emeraid Downs Dr . S277th SY ; _ t5Yh'St. NW 'D NB'
21 I $t NE S 277th St Harvey Rd D AIB
22 132nd A_v.eSE __� SE 282nd;S't ____ SE:312th St_.___:___;D ,_ �;B�;
23 124tfi AveSE- - " SE 282nd St SE;320th. St D C -
24'1;04tfi Av,e SE/SE'3p4# Sq, " 8tfi Sf,td�> �; , . . :.__ 132nd;.Ave_SE ' _i. - .--; _ D � . 8/A
25 105th PI SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Road 124th Ave.SE D B
26 Lakeland Hills Way_SE-i_= Lake T s_Parkway_= Oravetz Rd- ___._ '`--
- _aPP - p`- --'C1D"-
- -- -
27 29tii St SElRiverwaik.Dr. A Street SE Autium Way SoutFi D C
2S �108fh,Av,e�SEl112th_Ave::SE __ _S_277,th St=,_,�__,_�� SE�304th St__ _� „ ; D. ___ _ A„- .:
__ _ _ ,: _ _ _
29 49th"St NW - -- - B SfNW- "� - S 277th St" -"- "D" - -Future
30 R�StreeCSE-- �_�"� ': St_fi St NE_:., `; _ ;_; _ 4th 5treet SE_;__ _ __ �__ . _D _., - _ B/C'..:.
31 3rd Sf SW/Cross St. _ _ _ C Street__ _ Auburn_Way South.___ _ _ _ E__ _ _ _ _E_ __
32 17tF5#�5E---------�-- A'St'SE'-------Aubum Way'South , ---___�-- - B/A _
33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE Westem City Limits E F
34 l.akeland Milis'Way/OraveYz=: 'East:VaileyHwy_-_= KerseyWay�__� - - E - - A7B_._
35 West Valley Hwy 15th Street NW Southern City Limits E J C/B
36 ',Kersey"'Way " . . ` iQravetz"Ro_"ad_.,;___;�" Southe�nGtyLimits __�, __ D __ _ :,_ A..;, _.;
37 S: 316th treeUTerrace Drive West:Valley Highway Westem City Limits D _B,
38 S;29�t1i 5treeU65tfiAve __=West_Valley Mighway_� UV,e.-'ts ern City._L"imits__� ;,_`D'`-_ �iB"
39 51st Ave_S._ . _ _. - ___ __ S._288th Street __ Peasley Canyon Rd __ D_ ___B_ _
40 S:�284th-St�eet--�--- 112th Av'e 5E ." `. � 124tfi Ave SE "_ ` � � `- D - '- "B/A .
- ------------- -
4T S'..284tfi Sheet 124th Ave SE 132nd Ave.SE D Future
- -- -
42 R St.BypasslBlaok'Diamond M:StreeY$E�, , _ _ SR';16, . _ . __ _ D_ __ ,_Futute_
___ .
- - - _ -- -
* Split LOS indicates directional LOS in either3he East-Wesfor NoRh-South direc6on. Othenvise the LOS is the same in both directions.
*" Total travel time in the eastbountl diredion oannot exceed 1000 seconds for this'corridor lo meet thetOS Standard.
20
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
Concurrency (Adequate Public Facilities)
Concurrency involves matching pubiic facilities and new development. The GMA extends
concurrency to transportation facilities by �equiring that new development be served by
adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to
cause 4hese transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted
by local governments in their comprehensive plans.
In compliance with the GMA; adequate transportation system facilities must be available wifhin
six years of the time of occupancy and use of new development.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The City's transportation facilities include projects totaling $148,451,391. Tables T-2, T-2A and
T-2B show the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project
detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
As Table T-3 shows, operating budget impacts of$.9.94,842 are foreca"sted for transportation
facilities during the six yea�s 2017-2022.
21
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2.
CAPITAL FACILITIES P6AN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION =ARTERIAL STREET
2018 2077 2078 2019 2020 Y021 Total.
TIP#Caoacltv ProieUa - �
1 AStieet NW,Phade 7
Capital Cos[s 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25.000 25,000 150,000
Funding Sources:
UnrestActed Street Re�enue - - - - • - -
Grants - - - - - - -
hafic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000
Other -
2 AWS Pedestrian Imp.-DogwooH St SE�to Flr St SE
Capilal Costs - - - - - - -
Funding Sources:
Unrestrtcted Street Re�enua - - - - - - -
TraRc Impact Fees - - - - - - -
anar - - -_ - -- - -- -=- - - --- - - =-
- - --
s M sueee undemas
Cap�tal bosts - - - - - - -
Long-Term Debt 132.202 131.617 131.032 130.447 129,862 129.277 784,437
Funding Sources:
UnresMctedStreet Re�enua - - - - - - -
Grants - ' ' ' ' ' .
haflie ImpaMFee3 732,202 131,617 131,032 730,447 129,862 129,277 784,437
PWTF loan ' ' ' ' ' _ '
Other(Ofher Agencies).
6 S 2Mndl277th St Corritlor G�paciry.8 NomNlotorized Trefl Improvements
Cspltal Costs - 5,581,800 - � - - - - 5,587,800
FunEing Sources:
Unresvictetl�Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
GraMs 4,000,000 - - - - - 4,000,000
Trafie Impact Fees 581.800 - - - - - 561,800
Other(Development.Funds/ 1,000,000 - - 7,000.000
9 Aubum�Way S.Improvements(Hemlodc8t SE to Aeademy Dr 5�
Capilal Costs 200,000 - . - - - 200,000
Funding Sourcas:
Unrestrlctetl Streat Re�enue - - - - - - -
GraMs . . . - ' ' ' _ ' ' '
Trelfic Impact Fces 100,000 - - - - - 700.000
Olhet(MI'n 100,000_ ' ' . ____ _. ___ . __ __ . ..700.000.
10 FStreetSE�,AMtoAWS
. . Cepltal Costs . . .. 250,000 1,800,000 ' ' ' ' 2.050.000
Funtling Sources:
Urirestricted�Street Reienua - - - - - - -
Grants 200.000 1,440,000 ' ' ' ' 1.Bf0.000
TralFc Impact Fees 50,000 360,000 - 410,OOD
11 �M�Street NE;E Maln to 4th
Capital Cosls - - 100,000 275,000 1,150,000 -� 1,525;OOD
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
GraMs - - - 220,000 920,000 - 1,1ID,000
TratAc.lmpact Fees - 700,000 55,000 230,000 J85,000
74 M St SE-ani!72th St SE Tralfic Signal
Capital Costs � - - - 625,000 - - 825,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted.Street�Re�enue - - - - - -
GraMs - - - 500.000 - • 500.000
Trefic�Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Othet 125.000 125,OU0
22
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2(continued)
2076 2017 2078 2019 2020 2021 Tofal
TIB#CaoaaNProlecls
15 BUrStreet NE.Widening(Pike Street to R Street N�
Capital Costs - - 450,000 7,000,000 • - 1,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestdcted Street Re�enue - - - - • - -
Grants - - 360,OU0 800,000 - - 7,160,OU0
REET 2 - - - - - - •
Tralfic Impad Fees - 90,000 200,000 - 290,000
i7 Harvey Road 8�8th Street NE IMerseelion Improvements
Lon�}Tertn Debt 65,608 85,206 &4,803 84,402 84,000 83;598 507,817
Funding Sources:
Unrestdcted Streel Re�enue - - - - - - -
G2nts - - - - - - -
P1NTF - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 85.608 85,206 84.803 84.402 84.000 83:598 507,877
24 Academy Drive Muld-Use Trail
Capital Costs - - - 425,000 425,000 • 850,000
FundingSources:
Un2stricted Street Reeenue - - - 42,500 42,500 - 85,000
Grants - - - 382,500 362,SD0 - 765,000
ONei - - - - • -
25 461h Plaee S Realignment
CapRal Costs - - - - 825,000 - 835,000
Funding Sou�ces:
Un2sMcted Street Re�.enue - - - - - - -
Grants - - - - 575,000 - 575,OU0
T2fic.lmpact Fees - - �250,000 - 250,000
38 C.StreetSW8751hStreetSWlnfersectionlmprovements
Capital Costs - 150,000 - 875,000 - - 1,025,000
Fundirg Sources:
Unrestricted St2et Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grarits - �- - 750,000 - - 750,000
T2fic,ImpactFees._ _-_.. ._, _150,000 __ _ 125,000 _.. �__ _ ._. _ . _ 175,000
39. 7261h Ave SE Corridor 8320th Interaectlon Improvemenis
Qapital Costs 350,000 • - 1,500,000 - - 1,850,000
Funding Sowces:
Urnestricted�StreetRejenue 65,000 - - 150,000 - - 215,000
REET2 110,000 - - � - - - 110,000
Grants - - - - 1,200.000 - - 1,200,U00
. Other(GRC) 175,000 � 150,000 - 325,000
40 1241hA4eSECortidorlmprovementsPhase2 . . -- � - - �- -.� �. �. . � .. . . . .
Capital Costs - - • 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000
Funding Souices:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - • - -
G2rrt5 - - 300,000 880,000 2,000,000 - 3,780,000
_.Trefic ImpactFees .. . .. -. . _. . •_ ._ 100,000__ . 220,000. 500,000_ �- 820,000
41 R Street Bypa� . - � - - � -� � -� - - �... .
Capital Cosls - - - - - 500,000 500,000
Furiding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - . - - -
Grants - • - - - - .
Other - - - - - 500,000 500,000
23
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities PZan
TABLE T-2 (eontinued)
- --2016_ . . ---. 2017. _ . __Z078_. __ _2078. ... _-.2020_._ . .2027-_ __--Total_
TIP#CaoadN Proieds . . . . . . . . . .. _
42 SE 3201h Straet Cmridor.ImprovemeMs Phase 7
Cap.ital Costs 100,000 �- 600,000 662,500 3,261,600 - 4,644,100
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue 100,000 - - - • - 100,000
G2nts - - 480,000 530,000 2,953,440 - 3,963,440
Trafiio Impaot Fees - - 120,000 132,500 328,160 - 580,650
43 Atibum Way South Corridor Safety Improvemerits
Capital Costs 2,329,312 - - - - - 2,329,312
Fwding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - •
Grants 1,772,638 • - - - - 1,7M,838
Other(WSDO'� 308,874 - - - - - ,306,87�4
Trafic Impact Fees 250,000 - - - - - 250,000
45 1241h Avenue SE 8 SE�28Ctli.Street Intersection Safety Improvemenfs
Capital Cos.ts �- 100,000 600,000 • • - 700.000
Funding Sources:
Unrestncted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grants -� �- 450,000 - �-� - 450,000
hafiic Impact Fees� - 100,000 150,000 - • - 250,000
47 TraifieManagementCenterlmprovemenffi
Capflal Costs 25,000 - - - - - - 25,OOD
Funding Sources:
Unrestricled Street Re�enue - - - - - - �•�
Grarrts . . . . - - - - - - -
TrafAcJmpacl.Fces 25,OOq - - - • - 25,000
49 We5 Valley Wghway Improvemenis(151h St NW to W Main Sq
Capital Costs � -� - 100,000 600,000 3,000,000 - �3,700.000
. . . _._ . . . _ .. .. ._ . .. _. _. ..
Funding Sources:
Un2stricted�Street Reeenue - - - - - - • �
Granfs - - - 480,000 2,400,000 - 2,880,000
Tra1Ac Impact Fees� - 100;000 720;000� 600,000 - 820,000
.__.._. . ------ ---- - - -- - - - -- � � -
51 Lalie�Tapps Parkway ITS Fxpanson
Capifal Cosls 106,000 900,000 - - - - 1,005,Ob0
Funding Sowces:
Unrestricted Street Re�eriue - - - - - -
GraMs 82,950 711,000 ' - - - 793.950
TraRc Impaot Fees 22,050 169,000 -. .-. ... -. 211,050
52 A Slreet SE&.Lakeland Hills Way�SE Interseition Safery�8 Capadly Imp.
.. . .. .... . ... . ..
Capital Costs 75;000 - - - - -. 75,000
Fundirg Sou�ces:
Unrestncted Street.Retienue - • - - • - -
GraMs - - - �- - �- -
TraRc Impact Fees 75,000 - - - - - 75,000
�53 AWS:and-12fhStreetSEln�rsectlon,lmprovements
Capital Gosts 100,000 750,000 - - - - 850,000
Fundirg Sou�ces:
UnrestActed�Street;Re�enue 100,000 - - -� �-� - 100,000
Grarrts - 750,000 - - - - 750,000
hafiic:ImDectEees ----- " - _-. - _._-. -: -
24
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2 (continued)
2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 2027 SotaL .
TIP#Caoadri Prolects: - � -" � -
54 Kersey Way SWdy
CaDital Cosls 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
FuMing Souroes:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
haRc Mitigation Fees . 50,000 - - 50,000
55 W Main�Street Multlmodal CorriOor and ITS Improyementa
Capital Costs 3,494,400 - - - - - 9,494,400
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
O[her-Pund 105 314,510 • - - - - 314,510
Tr$iAc ImpacFFees 209,650 - - - - - 208,850
Grants 2,970,24U 2,970,240
56 EvergreenHeighlsSafeRoutestoSchoollmprovements
Capilal Costs - - - 790,000 563,000 4,620,000 5,973,000
Funding Souices:
Unrestdcted Stree[Re�enue - - - 178,500 &1,500 693,000 896,000
Grants - - - 671,500 476,500 3,927,000 5,077,000
ane. - - -
58 Aubum Way South Cortidor ImprovemeMs,Fir ST SE to Hemlock ST SE �
Capilal Casts ' ' ' - ' ' "
Funding Sources:
Urnastricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
TraiFc Impact Feas - - - - - - -
aner�n.irtj
59 Fuitium A4e NE 8�3rd St NE Pedestrian 8 Access Improvemenfs
Capital Costs - 50,000 300,000 - - - 350,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestdcted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grents - - 250,000 - - - 250,000
Traflic Impect Fees - 50,000 50;000 100,000
�60 M Street SE�Corridor(8tli St SE to AWS)
Capital Costs - - - 7,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000
Funding Sources:
Unreslncted Streal ReCenue ' ' ' ' - ' '
Grants - - - 925,000 3,750,000 - 0.675,000
TraNc Impact Fees - - - 750,000 750.000 - 1,500,000
.Other 250,000 250.000 _ .500,000.
67 SR-7810 Aubum Way South(SR-164)Bypas
Capital Costs - 1,000,000 3,500,000 17,500,000 - - 72,000,000
Funding SoOrces:
Uniestricted Stieet Re�enue - - - - - - -
Other(WSDO"n - 1,000,000 7,500,000 12,500,000 - - 75,000,000
Other(Mln 2,000,000 5.000,000 7�,000,000
63 29M Street SE 8 R Streat SE�Intenection Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 1,800,000 - - 1,800,000
Funding Sou'ces:
Unrestdcted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grants - • - 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000
REET2 ' - - - - - . _ .
_ Trafic Impact Fees. __ __ . _ .. ._- - 500,000 - , . ..500,000
64 Lea NIII Segment 1(R St NE to 105th PI S�
Capital Costs 100,000 - 2,45D,000 10,000,000 - - 12,550,000
FunAing Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grants . - 7,950,000 8,000.000 - ' 9,950,000
Traffic�impaclFees 10D,000 - 500,000 2,000,000 - - 2,600,000
aner - - -
25
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2(continued)
�76 2017 2018 Z019 2020 2021 Totai
TP#CaoaUri Proleds
65 Lea HIII Rtl SBgmeM 2(105fh Ave SE to 7721h Ave SE)
.Capital Cosls - - - - 3,500.000 8.500,000 12.ODO,OOD
Funtling Sourcas:
Un2stricted Street Re�enue �- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - 2,900,000 7,100,000 10,000,000
Trel�c ImOaot Fees - - - -� 600,000 7,400,000 2,000,000
aner - - -
68 lea HIII Rd Segment 3(172Ui Ave�SE to 124tl(Ave SE)
.Capital Co§tS �- - - 1,000;000 3,000,000 - 4,000,000
Punding Souroes:
Unrestdoted Street Re�enue �- - - - �- - .
Grants - - - - 3,000,000 - .9,000,000
T2ific Impact Fees - - - 1,000,000 �- • 7,000,000
aner - - -
69 Y2ntl StreSt NE S I St NE�Inter�ctlon
CapitalCosts 55.000 1,175.000 - - - - 7,23p.U0p
FurMing Sources:
Granls 40.OW 940�000 - ' - - 980.000
Tralfic Impact Fees 15,000 235,000 - - - • 250,000
anar. _ - - - -
- ---__
72 West Valley Highway Improvements.(SR-18 to 15(h St SY11)
CapitalCosts • 1W,000 500,000 2,500,000 �-� • 3,100,000
FundirgSourees: � �� -
Grants - - 400,000 �2,000,000 - - Z,400,000
TrafRc Impact Fees - 100,000 700,000 500,000 - - 700,00�
Other - - -
73 StewartRoad�(LakeTapps.ParkwayCorrltloq
Capital Costs - 100,000 - - - - 100,000
Funding Souroes:
Unrestricted Slreet Re�enue - 68,000 - - - - 88,000
TratAo Impact Fees - - - �- �- - .
Tralfic Mitiga4ion Fees - 34,000 - - - 34,000
SubLofal.CapeGN Vrolacls
Capifal Cosb 13,058,322 6,366,823 9,2A0,835 42.817.349 23.233.462 13.857.875 108.574,888
T1P#Nonl;aDaNtv Prolectx
3 /WbumWayCortidorlmproremen�
Capital Costs - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700
Funtling Sources:
Unrestrictetl SVeet Re�enue - - • 110,000 800,000 - 710,000
G2nls ' ' ' 708.700 .2.400,000 - .8.108,700
Other - - -
18 M Street SE 8��29th'Street SE Intersectlon Safery Improvemenfs �- - - -" - -�--- �-�
Capital Gosts 50,000 - • 400,000 -� - 45p,000
Fundirg Sources:
UnresMcted Street Re�eniie 50,OD0 - - 100,000 - - 150,000
Grents - - - 300,000 - - 300,000
Other - - -
. ._ - -� --_ _ .- - _ - __ _._.--- -
19 Aubum 1Nay Northllst Street NE Signal Improvemenffi
Capital Gosts 50,000 • 475,000 - �•� - 525,000
Funding Sourees:
Un2stricted Street Re�enOe 50,000 - 200,000 - - - 250,000
Grants - - - - - - . .- ..
an�r _ _ _ _ - . _ -- z�s,000 . - - • ns.000
26
City of Auburn Draft Capttal Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2 (continued)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
TIP#Non-CapaclN Prolects:
20 R Street SE�B 21ffi Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements
Capital Costs 75,000 - - 800,000 - - 875,000
Fundirg Souroes:
Unrestricted Streel Re�enue 75,000 - - 100,000 - - 175,U00
Grants - - - 700,000 - - 700,U00
Other - - - - -
21 Main Street Signal Upgrades
Capital Costs 420,000 • - - - 420,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue 320,000 - - - - • 320,000
GraMs - - - - • - .
Tratfic.Mitigation Fees 100,000 - - - • - 100,000
23 Riverwalk.Orive SE Non-Motorized Improvements � �
6apital Costs - 100,000 600,000 - - - 700,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestncted Street Re�enue - 100,000 100,000 - - • 200,000
Grants - - 500,000 - - - 500,000
Olher - - - - - - .
27 A Street SE Safety Improvemenffi Shidy
Capital Costs 35.000 - - - - - 35,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestncted Street Re�enue 35;000 - - - - - 35,000
GraMs - - - - - - .
ane� - - - - -
30 Citywide Pedestrian Acce�bility 8 Safery Program
Capilal Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
Funding Souroes:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue 100,000 100,000 100,U00 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Grants • - - - - - _.
Other - - - . _ ..
31 Cilywide Arterial.Bicyde&Safety Improvemerits
Capital Costs 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Reeenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
GraMs - - - - . _ . _
Other - - - _ _ .
44 DowntownTransltCenterAccesslmprovements
Capital Costs - 25D,000 - - - - 250�000
Funding Sources:
Un2stricted Street Re�enue - 50,000 - - - - 50,000
Grams - 200,000 • - - - 200,000
Other - - - - - _
46 104th Ave SE 8 Green River Road SWdy
CapRal Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grams - - - _ _
27
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2.(continued)
2016 2017 2078 2019 2020 2027 To1al
TIP#Non-Capaeid.Prolects:
48 A St SE&bYh�St SE Safety and Access Improvements
Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
FurMirg Souices:
Unrestricled Slreet Reeen� - - ' - - - '
G�ants - - - - - - -
Other 50,000 - - - 50,OU0
50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs
Capkal Costs� 150,000 150;000 150,000 150,000 • • 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - -
FtEET 100,000 30,000 30.000 30,000 - - 190,000
Othei(WRA) 50,000 - - - - • 50,000
Grants - 720,000 120.000 720.000 - - 380.000
62 AWS Stree�cape Improvemenb(SR18 to M St S�
Capital Costs - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000� - 4,750,OOD
Funding Sources:
UnresMcted Slreet Re�enue - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,OOD
CaraMs - - - 1,750,000 2.600,000 - 4.350,000
REET 2 -. _ . .
6Z Citywide Treffic Signals Safety Improvements
CapRal Cosls 412,575 - -� -- - - 412,575
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Streel Re�enue - - - - - - -
Grbnts . 412.575-_ -_ -- - -_ _.. ___.. - - 412,575�
68 971h SS SE 8 A St SE Tmffic Signal Safety Improvement
Capkal�Costs 722,600 - - -� -� • 722�600
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - - �-�
Grants 635;360 - - - - - 635,360
Other-FurM 105 87,240 - - - - -� 87.240
Subtota I..Non�Ca oa GN.Prolecls:�
CapiEal Co9s 2,170,775 600,000 1,425,000 4,218;700 6,000,000 100,000 14,513,875
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
Capacity Projects 12.640.512. 6,150,000 9.025.000 42.802.500 23,019,600 13,645,000 10Z,282,612
Non-Capacity Projeets 2.170.175 600,000 7.425.000 4.218:700 6,000,000 100,000 14,513,875
Longdertn Debt �217�,810 216.823 215,835 214,&49 213,862. 212,875 1,292,054
Total.Costs 15;228,49J 6,966,823 70,665,835 47,036,049 39,233.462� 13,957,875 123,088,547
FUNDING�'SOURCES:
. . . .UnrasVicted Stieel Re�enue 1.000.000 316,000 500.000 927,000 1,127,000 793,000 4.65Z,000
G2rds 70,173,763 4,161,000 4,810,000 22,217,700 �24;359,440 11,027,000 76,688,903
Traffic Impad Fees 7,671�,310 1,425,823 1,550,835 5;842;349 3;497,022. 1,637,875 15,625;274
Trafic Mitigation Feas 150,000 34,000 - - - - 184,000
REET2 210,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 - - 300,000
PWiF�Loan - - - - - - -
Fund 105-Artenal St.Preserv. 401,750 - - - - - 401�,750
OtFer(OtherAgenciesJ . .1,681,674 1,000,000 3;775,000 18,025;000 250:000 SOOADO 25;237,6Z4
TotalFunding 15,228,497 8,968,823 10,665,635 47,038,049 29,233,462 73,957,875 123;088;547
'Mltigstion agraements,inipsct fees, contntiiitions, other agencias, other funds
2g
City of Auburn Draft Cgpital Facilities Plqn
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapFtal Facitities Plan
Siz Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 :Spepial Revenue�Fund
Project Title; A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 74th St NW) TIP# 1
Project No: e207a0
ProjectType: Capaclty
Project Manager. Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID#18
DescripGon:
Construct a new multi-lane arterial from 3rd Street NW to 14th Street NW. This project will impro�mobility and is tied to
oorridor developmeM. tt is coruisterrt with the Comprehensive Pian and completes a missing link of a rmrWsouth arterial
corridor.The projeat length is approidmately thieet�uarters of a mile. The City purchased rigFit-of-way from the northem
property ownec If the property deoebps,some'or a portion of those fimds may be reimbursed to the City(tohal cost was
$251,000).
Progress�Summary: - � - �
Pre�design was completed prior to 2007. Final design arxJ enHronmer�tal pertnittirg were completed in 2011 and
construc6on was completed in 2013. Major plaMings are scheduled in 2015 as part of tlie wetland monitonng fhat is
requiied to coritinue ur�12023.
Futurelmpact on Operating Budget:
The armual mairrtenance cost for riiis project is estimated to tie$25,830.
- - __
ActiVity:
2075 YE 2076 Year.End
Funtling Soureea Prlor to 20t5 Estlmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProJect Toql__
UmesMcted Street Rewnue 64,999 64,999�
Grants-decured(Fed,State,Lxal) 6,562,702 6.562,702
TiaKc Impacf Feas 999,953 300,000 25,000 25,000 1,324,953
Other Sources-INulticare ConMbulion 383.381 383,381
Tofal Funding Sourcex 8,011,035 �300,000 25,000 25,000 8,336,035
Capifal Ezpenditurex
Design 1,591,160 50,000 70,000 �10,000 1�,65t,160
Righto/WaY 821.341 ffi1,341
EnNronmental 701;708 200,000 � 901,708
Constmcllon 4,896.826 50,000 15.000 75,W0 4,961,828
Total Expendltuies 8,011,035 300,000 25,000 25,OOU"- " -�8,338,W5
Fo►eeasted Projeet Cost: -
Toml
2018 2079 2020 2021 201&2027
FunCing Sourcez
UnresMctetl Slreet Rewnue _
G2nts-Secured(Fed,State,Loca/) _
Tra/!ic/mpacf Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000
Other Sources-Multicare Conhibufion
Total Funding Sources � - � �25,000 25,000 25.000 25,000 750,000
Capital EzpendlLires
Design 70,000 70,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
Right W INay _
En�.ironmentel
COlISf2Cf%O!I 1$,000 1$,�00._. . 1$,000 1$,0� 90,000
Total ExpandlWres 25,000 25,000 25,000 25;000 -�-150,000
29
City ofAuliurn Draft Capitdl Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan
_ .
Sbc Year Capital Facilities PIan,2016-2021 _ Special Revenue_Fund
Projeot TiUe; Auburn Way South Pedesfrian Imp. (Dogwbod StSE to Fir'St SE) TIP# 2
ProjectNo: ep1118
Project Type: CapacRy, Non-Motor¢ed
Project Manager: Jacob Sweeting LO§ Corridor ID#4
Descriptlon: — -
This project will consVuct pedesMan improvemerits along Aubum Way Southbetween D.ogwood StreetBE and Fir Street
SE fhat are consistent with WSDOTs SR-164 Rou[e Devebpmerrt Plan.The project inGutles side.walk improvemerits,
access management,a mid-bbck pedesVian crossing,construotion of a U-tum wetlge for eastbound vehicles at Fir Street
SEand street IigMing_ _
Progress Summa_ry:
The Citywas awa�ded$100,000 in federal funding and $740,830 in state fimding in May 2011.Otherfunding sourcesare
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe contribution,WSDOT contribution for paving,and Private uGlity coMributionsfor undergrounding.
Project design tiegan in 2012.Design was completed in2015 and constructionis scheduled to be completed in 2015.
Future Impact on OperaBng Budget:- - - _ .
This project will have no impact on the operatirig budget for sfreet mairiterence.
Activity:
2075 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcex Prior W 2015 F�imate 2U16 Budget 207Z Budget Pro eet Total.
UrnesMcted Streat Re�snue 37,816 63,428 - - �- � �101;244-
Grants-�Secu(ed(Fed 8�State) 235;389 604;237 - - 839,626
TraNic Impact Fees - 115,000 - - 115,000
WSDOT(FedeiaQ 107�;750 - - 107,750
Other�Souices(Priyete Utilifies) 19,368 784,450 - - 203,818�
�O1herSources(Muckleshoot) �41,900 288,100 330,000
ToaPFuntliag Sourcea 334,473 1,362,965 - - 7,697,438
CapitalExpendifurex
Deslgn 334,473 9,OtU - - 343,483
R/ght of Way - - - - -
Constmction 1.353,955 1,353,955
Total Fi�pendlWres 334,473- "1.362,965� - - - 1,69];438
Forecasted Project Cost:
Totai
2018 2019 20211 2021 20762021
Funding Soureea
Unrestncted Street Revenue - - - - -
Gran[s-Becured�(Fed&State) - - - - -
TraHic Impact Fees - - - - -
Ottier Sources(hLckleshoot) - - -
Total.FundingSourqes - - - - -
Capiql ExpendlWres
Design - - - - -
RigM of Way - - - - -
Consttiction ' '
Tofal ExpendlWree . . - .. . . - _ - - - -
30
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- --- _ .
_ _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (�02) Capha�Fac��ities.Ptan
Six Year CapNal FaellRies Plan,2016-2027 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTipe: M Street Underpass(3rd St SE to Sth St SE) TIP# 5
ProjectNo: c20'Ia0
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. Ryan Vondrek LOS Cor�idor ID#8
Descriptioni - . . - -- - - � - - - - -- ---._ .
Construction of a grade.separated railroad crossing of M Street SE.at the BNSF Stampede Pass Vacks.
Prog7essSummary: � � - � - ��� -
100%Design Drawings arxJ rigM of way acquisition were completed in��2011..Construction started in early2012 and will be
complete diai.ng 2014. Debt Service is scheduled each yearthiough 2041.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
The annual,maintenance costforthis project is estimated[o be$21,827.
Acti4ity:
'2015 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sourees Prior M 2015 Estimate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget Project Tonl
UmestNcted Street Revenue - - - - -
GraMs-Secured(Fed,Stale,Local) 9,731,904 - - �9,731,904
REET2 1,140,000 - - 1,140,000
Tiaf/Ic lmpacl Fees(Constructlon) 4,309,782 - - 4,309,782'
TraH]c/mpec[Fees(Debt Service) 148,190 132,-751 732.202 t37,617 413,1C3
TiaKic Mftigatlon Fees 660,000 - - 660,000
PWTFL(30 years) 3.284,857 - - .3,284,857�
OtherSouroes(OfherAgencies)` .3.090,514 _ 3,090,514
TOTaI Funding Sources 71,365,247 132,751 132,202 131,877 22,830,200.
Gpital Ezpendih�rea
Design 2.688.924 - - 2,668,92d
RightofWay 3,358,443 - - 3,358,443
Constroctian 76,769,690 - - 76,169,690
PWTFL Oebt SerWce 148,190 132;751 132,202 131,617 413J43
Tofal ExpendiWrea Y1,366,247 132,751 132,202 131,677 22,630,200
. __ '._" .. _ _ "
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 2079 2020 2021 2016-2021
Funtling Sourrcsx
Un�esMcted Street Re�enue - - - - -�
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
REET2 - - - - -
T�c lmpact Fees(Construction) - - - - -
TraHic Impact Fees(Debt Service) �3'1,032 130,447' 129,862 129,277 784,437
Tre/Ilc M/tigation Foes - - - - - .-
PWTFL(30 years) - - - - -
Ofhe/�SourCes(OtherAgencies)' �- - - - -
... ._____.___' —'_ .
7otal Funding Sources 131,032 130,447 729,862 129,277 784,437
Capifal EzpendiWrex
IJBSign ' " ' " '
Right o/Wey ' " _ " "
Construction ' - ' -
PWTFL DebtBeMce� 131,032 '130,447 129,862 129,277 784,437
Total.ExP.endiWrea: -"131�,032.. . . --730,447 729.662 129,277 784.437
�Grants 7 OthecSouroes: Ofher Agencies are King County Metro Sewer, Port of Seattle;Port of Tacoma,and BNSF Railway
31
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
__ - --=— = - - ---- __ _ _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap�tal Fac��rties P�an
Soi Year Capital Faetlkies Plan,2016-2021 Speelat Revenue Fund
_ _.. ____ _ _ _ _
ProjectTitle: 5272nd/277th St CorridorCapacity&Non-Motorized Trail Improvements TIP# 6
Project No: c222a0 STIPk AUB-42
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Nianager. Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID#15
Description:
This project includes prelimina:ry engineering,design,rigM-of-way acquisition and co�struction of majorwidenirig on'5277th
Street,including the addition ofthree lanes,one westbound and Mro eastboimd,a Class 1 trail,and stortn improvemerrts.
The project is approbmatey 0.9 miles long.
Progress Summary:
Stafr is coordinatirg with the City of Kent and King County4o complete annexation ofthe roadway into the CityofAubum.
Robertson Properties Group i§partcipaUng in thisproject and is dedicating all necessary roadwayfrordage to fhe City.
.�., ... .
Future Impact on Ope�ating Budget:
The ann�l mairrtenance costs for this project is e5timated to be$27,250:
_ _ _ _ _ -
Activity:
2015 YE Z0�6 Yea�Entl
. Funding Sources: Prior to 2015 Eatlmate . 2078 Budg'et.. 2077.Bud� et .Bro'edt Total.
UmesMcted Shaet Re�anue " � --82:539-�"� -- 308�,062- - " -� ---"-----"- -" _ 390.60t
Grents-Securetl�Federal 407,849 612.851 - - 1�,020,700
Grents-Secured State - - 4,000,000 - 4,000,000
TreKc Impact Fees - - 581,800 - 581,800
Other(DeveloPmeM Funds)' ' ' 1.000.000 - 1.000.000
ane�
Tcfal Fundin8 Sourms: 490,368 920,973 5,581,800 - 6,993,101
Capifal Expend7Wres:.
Deslgn 490.388 900,913 - - 7,391;301
Rigtit of Wey - 20,000 - - • 20,000
Construction - .5,581,800 - 5,581,800:
_ . . '
TotalExPendiWres ' - -�- - 490.368 " -420.973 - -5.587.800"--- -..- . _ .. �--"--6.993.101
Porewsted-Project Cost:.
7ota1
2078 2079 2020 2021 20762021
Funding Sourcas:
Urirestncted Sfreet Revenue - - - - -
Grents-Securetl Stete - - - - 4,000,000
. ._ . . ._ _ . . .
Tra�c Impact�Fees - - - - 581,800
Other(DeGelopmerifFurMs�' - - - - 1�,000,000
Ofher ' ' '
Total Funding Sources�. - - - . 5,581,800
Caplfal Expenditurea
._ ... ._. .__.. ...
Design ' ' ' ' '
R/ght o)Wey - - - - -
Coirstruction _ - - .,- . -. - - -_ . -_..._ . -. _ .._5.581,800.
Toml.ExpendiWrea: • - - - 5,587,800�
32
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ - - --
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capite�Faci�nies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan,2016-2021 Special Re4enue Fund
_. _ .
Froject Title: Aubum Way S Improvements jHemlock St SE to Academy Dr SE) TIP# 9
Project No: asbd02
Project Type: CapacHy
Project Mareger. TBD LOS Corridor ID#xx
Description:
Widen AubumWayS between Hemlock St SE and Academy DrSE to accommodate two general purpose lanes in each
direction,ceMer tum lanes,access managemeM mediaru, U-tums,curb,gutter,sidewalk,illumination,transit stop
improvemerrts,newtraffic signals,IrrtelligentTransportation Systems,streetscape and stortn improvemer�.The project
length is aPpropmatelytwo miles. �
Progress Summary:
Conceptual comdor plan will be coordinated with the MIT and,WSDOT in 2015.This project is planned as a partnership
tietw�een itie City of Aubum and the Mff. Pre-design e$ort will produce a project construcdon cost esti mate. Major grant.
funding is e�iected to come froin fuUae federal competibons.This project will eidend cortidor improyemerits along Aubum
Way Scompleted imder predious projects.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operetirg tiudget for sVeet maintenance.
Activky:
2015 YE 2016 vear EnA
Funding Sourcea Prlor l0 2015 Esdmata 2018 Bud et 2017 BuH et Pro ect Total
Un2stncted Strset Re�enue - - - - -
Gren(s-Secured(Fed,Stafe,LocalJ - - - - -
Tra(I!c ImpacCFees - - 100,000 - 100,000
REET2 - - - - -
Other(M/n 100,000 100,000
Total Funding Sources - - 200,000- - - - 200,000
Capital Ezpendidires
Des/gn - - 200,000 - 2U0;000
Righto/Way - - - - _
Construction - - -
Toa����aiares - - zoo,000 - zoo,000
-
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2078 2019 2020 2021 20162021.. .
Funding Sources: �
Unrestncfed Sfreet Revenue - - _ _ _
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,LocalJ - - - - _
Tral/ic Impact Fees - - - - 100,000
REET2 - - - - _
Other(MIT) - - 100,000.
Total Funding Sourcas - - - - 200,000
Capifal Ezpenditures
Design - ' ' ' 200,000
Right of Way - - - �- .
ConsVuction -
Total Expenditurex . - - , - 200.000
33
City ofAuburn Draft Cqpital Facili'ties Plan
-----. . . ---- ----
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capkal Facilities Plan
_ _ _
Six Year CapitalFacilkies Plan,2016-2021 Speefal Revenue Fund
Project TiUe: F Street SE Non-Motor¢ed Improvements(Downtown to Les Gove) TiP# 10
Project No: ep1416
ProjectType: Capacity, Non-Motoraed
Project Manager. Seth Wickst�om LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Descriptfon:
The F S4 SE project includes pavement rehabilitation,instaliation of curbs,gutters,bike lanes,sidewalks,ADA
improvemenGs,u6lity undergroimding,LED street iightifg,new two way center left han-lane,crash attenuation at the
s�ports for the BNSF railroad bridge,initiation of Aubum Staff Bike share pilot program,wayfinding signage and a
"Bicycie 8oulevard"designation of Foadway connections between Aubum City Hap arid ttie Les Gove Park CamPus. This
project improves mobilityarid safety along the comdor and will complete a gap in ttie non-motori�d rietwork between
Autium's Dowrrtown arid tlie Les Go�e Communiry Campus.The major iMrastruqture irtiprovements are appropmately 0':3
miles long and fhe"Bicycle Boulevard"impro�ements are just over a,mile long,
- - - - _ .__
- __ - - -
Piogrgsg Summary:
Prelimiria_ry desigqand surveywork was completed in 2009.Federal grarrt was secured in 2014 for Design and ROW
phases.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
The annual maiMenance cost for this project is estimated to be$4,100.
Acfivity: - -
2075 YE 2015 Year�End
FunCing Sources Prior to 2015 69mate 2016 Budget �2017 Butlget Project Total
UniesMctetl StreehRe�enue 141 - - - 141
Grants-SecmadFederal - 320,000 200,000� - 520,000
Grants-UnsecuredFedera/ - - - 1,440,000 -
TiaHic linpact Fees 7;700 80,000 .50,000 �360�,000 137,700
Ofher
Tofal FunCing Sources 7,841 400,000 250,000 7,600,000 657,841
Capital FxpenClWres
Design 7.841 400,000 200.000 - 607;841
Right W Way - - 50,000 �50,000
Canstmction - 1,800,000
Total Fxpentliti2s 7,867 400,000 250,000 7�,800,000 . 857,841
._ .____ . .. . _ . _ . . _ .
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 . 2079 ._2020_ r2021_ _2018-2021
FundingSources -�_ . . . . .._ __. __ __-___ .. _. __ — . . _ .. .
UnresMcted Sfreet Rei�enue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(FedJ - - - - 200,000
Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - - 1,440,000
Tra//ic Impact Fees - - - - 410,000
Other -
TotalFunding Sources: - - - - '2,050;000
Ca�piTal Fxpendidires
Design - - - - 200,000
RighLWWay - - - - 50,000
ConstNctlon - - - - 1,600,000
Total Expenditurex - - - - 2,OS0,000
34
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capkal Facilities Plan
Six Year C_apital Facilifies Plan,2016-2021 Speefal Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP# 11
Project No: asbd12
ProjectType: Capaoity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#S
_ . _
Description:
This project will construct a four-lane street section that includes sidewalks,gutters,landscapjng and streetlights on M St
NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design wili be completed durirg 2018 ro refine project scope,alignment,and cost
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: -
The annual maintenance cost for this project isestimated to tie$1,500.
ActivRy: - .
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Fun0ing Sources Prfor to 2015 _ Estimate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProJect Total
UrnesMctedStreetRevenue - - �--�� -�- ������--�-� ��
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Local) - - - - -
REET - - - - .
T�c Impact Fees - - - - -
Otlrer - - - . _
- Tofal Funding Sources . - - - - -
Capipl E�cpenditures
Desrgn - - - - -
Right of Way ' ' ' ' '
Construction - - - - -
Tofal�F�cpendlturex� " = -- . . .. ' - •
Forecasted Project Cost:
roml
20'IB _ _ 2019__ .. 2020 2021. 2016-2021
_.
Funding Sources � � -- - � � - ��—-
UrnesMctetlStreet Rewnue - - - - _
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,LocaQ - 220,000 920,000 - 1,140,000
REET - - _ _
Traific/mpact Fees 100,000 55,000 230,000 • 385,000
Other ' ' ' ' '
Tofal Funding Sources 700,000 275,000 7,150,000 • 7,525,000
Capital Fxpenditures
Design 100,000 75,000 - - 175,U00
Riqhtol Way • 200;000� - - 200,000
Constmction - - 1,'I50,000 - 1,150,000
Total ExpendiNres �"" -- 700,OUD� � 275.000 1,150,000 - 1,525.000
35
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FacllRies Plan
SixYea[CapkalFacil"�ties Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue;Fund
ProjectTitle: M SfreetSE/1Zth Street SE Tratfie Signal TIP# 74
Project No: cp�000c
FrojectType: Intersection Improyement, Capacity
Project Manager: TBD LOS Corridor ID#11
Description:
This project:inchides the design,right-0f-way acquisition and construction of a new traTfic signal.
- - - - - -- - - - --
Pro'giess$ummaryd . .
Future Impact on�perating Budget:
The anm�al maiMenarxe cost for fhis project is estimated to be$6,600.
- - -_ _ __ _ . _
ACtivity:
2015 YE 20�5 Year End
Funding Sourcex .,_PAor to20�5__. _ EsUmate 2018 Budget 2017 Budget ProJeet Total
UnresMcted Sfreet Revenue �" - - - - - • -
Grants-Unsecured{Fed,State,Local) - - -. - -
� REET 2 - - - - -
T�c Impact Fees ' ' '. . '
Other Dewloper �-� - -
Topl Funding Sources .._. .�_.__ . . _ - -_. . _ . . _._ . . _ . _ .___ . _. _.... . -_'_.
Capifal�Fxpenditures
Desi90 - - - ' -
RighLW Wey - - - - -
Constructlon _ -. _ _ _ - - -
_ . - - -- -- - ��-- - - � -- .._ ----
Tofnl Fxpenditures � - ' ' ' '
Forecasted Project Cost:
T�I
_ 2018 __ 2019 2020. 2021 20162021
Funding Sources
UnresMctetl Street Rewntie - - -. - -
C'rants-Unsecuretl(FedState,Local) - 500,000 - - 500,000
REET�2 - - -. - -
TiaHic/mpect Fees - - - - -
Other-De�sloper c 125,000 - __. - 125;000�,
.. .. .. . __. . . .
Totel�FundingSourcex - 625,000 • • 625,000
Capifal Expanditures
Design - 75,000 -. - 75,000�.
Righf d INay - �50,000 - • �50,000
CarsWction 500,000 500,000
Tofal F�cpenditures - 625,000 - • 6Z5;000
36
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIi4L STREET FUND (102) Capttal Facqities P�an
Six Year CapiNalFacilities Plan,2016-2021 Spe.cial Revenue Fund
ProjectTiUe: 8th Street NE Widening (Pike St NE to R S4 NE) TIP# 15
Project No: cp�000c
Project Type: CapacRy
Project Mareger. TBD LOS Corridor ID#19
Description::
Widen Sth SVeet NE[o eMend the five-lane cross-section which currently epsts to the west of Pike St NE to R St NE by
providing an additional travel lane along the south side of the roadway.This is a planning le�el cost estimate.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
The annual maiMenance cost for this project is estimated to be$600.
Attiviry:
2015 YE 20'I_8 Year End
Funding$ourcea Prior to 2015 Eatimate 2018 Budget 2077 Bud et Projeet3otal
Unrestncted Street Re�enue - - - - -
Carents-Unsecmed(FeC/,State,LxaQ - - - - -
REET - - - - _
T�c Impacf Fees - - - - -
Other - - -
Total Funtling Sources: - - - - - � � -c
Capifal Fspendittiras:
Design ' - ' - '
Right of Way ' ' - ' '
Conshuction - - �-
Tofal ExpenAltures - " ' "...� " ------'
Foieeasted Projeet Cost:
roal
2018 2079 2020 . 2027. __201&202�
FundingSources �-� � - �- --�— ��
Unrestricteo'Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecuied(Fetl,Stale,Local) 360,000 800;000 - - 1�,160,000 .
REET - - - - _
Traf(ic/mpact Fees 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000�
Other -
Total Funding Sources 450,000 1,000,000 - - 7,450,000
Capital F�cpentlitures
Design 200,000 - - - 200,000
Rig/itWWay 250,000 - - - 250,000
Consnuction - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 �
Total ExpendiWres: 450,000 1,000,000 - - 7,450,000
37
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capkal Facilities Plan
Six YearCapNafFacilRles Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue.F.und
Project Tipe: Harvey Rd NEl8th St NE Intersection ImprovemeMs TIP# 17
Prqject No: cp0611
Frnject Type: Capacity
Project Manager. None LOS Corridor ID#5;19
D'escription;i - . _ . __- - - -.. _ . . . - - - - — . . _ _ . _ —�..
Add one eastbound througYJrigM turtrlane on 8th St NE to the west of Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traTfic
channelization to accommodate tha new lane. The�additional lane will reduce traffic delays and que�rg at the irrterseclion
ofNarvey Rd arxl:8th St NE in all directions. This project will reconstruct M St NEfrom 4fh St NE to 81h St NE,a segmeM of
roadway approbmately0.3 miles long with a four-lane cross-section. The reconstructiortwill address the ebsting'poor
pavemeM condition and fill in any gaps in tlie sidewalk nerivork.
-_ _
Progiess'Surtimary': .. . - ._�. . . _ . . . . .
Pmject was completed in 2010.Ongoing budget is for Public Works Trt�.st Fwid Loan�debt paymeMs scheduled through
202$.
Future Impapt on Operating BuBgef: � � � � � � �
This pmject wilf haoe no impacton the operatirg budget for street mairrterence.
Ac4ivity: -
2ots VE 20ts�rear�Ena
Funding Sources Prlor to 2075 EClmate 2016 Bud et .2017Budget Pro ect:Total
UnresUicted Street Re�enue - - - - -
Grants-Securetl(Fed.State,Local) - - - - -
Traffic/mpact Fees(Debf SeMce) 435;500 86,010 85,608 85.206 607;118
TiaH7c Impact Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500.
� PWTF 1,527;300 1.527.300
Tofal.Fundln8 Souroee 2,167;300 -� � -�86;070 � —85;608� -- ��"85,206 � � ��" 2,338,918
Capital ExpendiWroc
Design 327.500 - - - 327.500
Rlght W Way 200,400 - -. - 200,400
Constiuctfon 1,203.900 - - - 1.203;900
Long Term Delit-PWTF 435.500 86,010 85.608 85,208 607;118
Totnl.Expendiwrea 2.167,300 86,010 85;608 85,206 2,336,918
�Foreoasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020..._ . . 2021.. _.201fr2027. ._
Funding Sources:� " . - . ... -. . ..-'� - -� -- - - - -
UnresVicfed Streef Re�snue - - - - -
c���s-secwea(Fed,stare,��� - - - - -
Trafllc/mpact Fees(Detit Service) 84,803 84.402 64.000 83.598 507,817
TreNlc/mpact Fees - - - - -
PWTF
Total Funding Sourees: 84;803 84,40Y- 84;000 83,588" � - 507;617
CaplfEl Efipendiblres
Desi9n ' _ _ _ '
R/ght o{WaY ' _ " ' '
Construction - - - - -
Long Teim Debt-PWTF 84,803 84,402 84,000 _83.598. �507,61Z.
Totel EcpentliWree:� 64;803 �84,40Y� -- 84;000 83;596� - 507;677
38
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Siz Year Capital Faciiities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue,Fund
Projecf Title: Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail TIP# 24
Project No: �p��
Project Type: Class 1 Trail(Capacity)
Project Manager. TBD LOS Conidor ID#N!A
Descriptton:
This project will use existing Academy Drive rightof-way to create a multi-use trail between the Green Rive�Road and
,4ubum Way South.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:.
The annual maiMenance cost for this project is estimated 4o be$25,000.
Activity:
20'15 YE- 20�6 Year Entl
Funding Sources Brlor.to 2015 .C�timate 2016 Bud et 2017 BuAget Pr ect Tofal
UniesMctetl Sheet Rersnue - - - - - -�� - - - - -��- � - - - _
firan[s-Unsecwed(Fed,State,Loca/) - - - � - _
REET - - - - -
Traffic/mpact Fees - - - - -
Other Souroes
Total Funding Souicex - - - - -
Capital EzpendiWres
. . _.besign - - ' - -
RightolWay - - - .- .-
ConsWction - ' - '
Total Eupendih�re� ' ' ' ' '
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018� 2018 2020 2021 20762021
FuntlingSources:
Un2sWcledStreetRe�niie - 42;SOD 42,500 - 85,000
Grants-Unsecmed{Fed,State,L.oqaQ - 382,500 382,500 - 765,000
REET _ ' _ _ _
Traf/ic Impact Fees - -� - _ _
Other Sources - -
Total Funding Sources - 625,000 425,000 - 850,000
CaplWl F�cpendiWres
Design . - 100,000 - - 100,000
Right o/Way ' ' ' - -
Constmction - 325,000 425;000 - ._ . 750,000
Total Expenditurea - 425,000 425;000 - � � B50,000
39
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Faci.lities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facllkies Plan
Six Year Capkal Facilitles Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: 46th Place S Realignment TIP# 25
Pmject No: �p�pp�
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Cor�idor ID#N/A
bescription:
The project will realign 46th Place S to the soutli of S 321 st Street The realigruneM wiil move ihe 461h Place S intersection
with S 321 st Street approbmatery 350 feet to the east of the current location.This wili create twoT-iMersections(44ih
Av2nue S and 46th Place S)in place of the epsting fo�u-leg irrtersection.The epsting 461h Place S will be dead-ended to
the south of S 321 st Street The project will improye safety and traffic operations at Ufe iritersections.
_ _ _-- - - - - - --- -- —
Progress Summary:
RigM-of-wayfo�tFie iealigned ioadwaywfll lie Cedicate'd as part of an adjacent developmerrt project.
FuturelmpactonOperaUngBudget: . . - - - --- - -- --
The annual maintenance cosffo�this projeot is estimated to be$1,750.
Activity:
- 2075 YE 2016 Year End.
Funding.Soufces Pdor.to2075. Estimate.. . .20166ud �et_-3017Bud8et._ __ProectSotal__
Unrestrrcfed 8treet�Re�enue . . . . . . .. .. .. . . ---.- _.. . _.. _. ._ -
Grents-Unsecured(Fed,State;Locaq - - - - -
REET ' ' .' ' _.
T�c ImpactFees - - - - -
Other Sources - -
7otal Funding Sourcex - - - - -
Capital ExpendiWres
Design _ ' ' ' '
RigM of.Way - - - - -
ConSWCtion - -
ToEal FxpendiWrex . - - - - -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2018 20'19 2020 2027 20'I&2021
Funding Suurcex
Unrestncted�Sdeet Re�enue - - - - -
. . _ . _ . . _ . ._ . _.. _. . _ .
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - - 575,000 - 575,000
REET - - - - -
TrsKrc Impact Fees - - 250,000 - 250,000
Other Sources -
Total Funding Sources: - - 825,000 - 625,000
Caplfa_I Eipendi4irex
Deslgn - - 125,000. �- 125,000�.
RightoLWay - - 25;000 - 25,000
Construction - -. 675;000._ _ . -____ . .__675;000
Total FxpentliWres - - 825,000 - 825,000
40
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilifies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project TiUe: C Street SW& 15th Street SW Intersection Improvements TIP# 38
Project No: cp�ooc
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor fD'#12,13
Description: -
This project will install a southbound right-tum pocket,re-channelize the intersection to provide two southbound through
lanes,and replace the ebsting sparnvire tratfic signal with a new traffic signal.
Progress5ummary:
Design is piarmed to tiegin in 2017.Construction will tie scheduled once full funding is secured.
F.ufure Impact on Operating Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is es6mated to be$2,500.
Activity:
� 2075 VE P016 Year End
Funtling Sourees: Pdor to 2015 Etimate 2016 Budget 2077 Budget ProJeetTofal_ .
Unrestncted Sheet Re4enue - - - - � -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - _
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 150,000 -
REET2 - - - � - _
Otner -
Total Funding Sourcex - - � - 150;000� -
Capital Expendi[ures
Design - - - t50,000 -
Right o/Way - - - - -
Constiuction - - -
Tofal Fxpendltures: - �- - 150,000 -
Forecasted Project Cost:
7otal
2078 2019 2020 2021 20162021.
Funding Sources:
Unrestdctetl Street Revenue - - . _ _
Grants-Lnsecured(Fed,State,Locaq - 750,000 - - 750,000
T2Kc.lmpac7 Fees - 725,000 - - 275,000
REET2 ' ' ' ' •
Ofher ' ' ' ' '
TotalFuntlingSourees --���-� , 875,000 - - 7,025,000
Capftal ExpendiWrex
Design - - - - 150,000
Right ol Wey - - - - _
Cdnstruction - 875,000 - - 875,000
Total Expenditures � -�� . 875,000 - - 7,025,000
41
Ci,ty of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faciiities Plan
S_ix.Y,ear Capital Faeilitie_s.P1an,2016-2021 Speciat Revenue Fund
Project TiUe: 724th Ave SE Corridor 8 320th Intersection Improvements TiP# 39
Project No: asbd04
Project Type: Capacky
Projeot Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#23, 25
- •-- — - -
Descripliorr;
This project will Tund the design,rigMof-way acquisition,and consVirction of improeements to fhe iMersection of SE 3201h
St and 124th Ave SE.The iritersection is located at ihe main errt(axe to G2en Ri�,er College and:will reg�rire additional orr
site improveme�ts to be constructed.
Progress Summary:
- - - - _ _
Future Impact on Ope[ating Budget:
The annual mairitenance oost for this projed is estimated to be$2,500.
Activity:
2015 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sources Priw to 2015 E5lmste 2016 Butlgat 2017 Budget ProJect Tofal
Unreshicted SVeet Re�entie - - 65,000 - 65,000
G�ants=Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
�REET 2 - - 110;000 - 110;000
Other(GRC) - - 175,000 �- 175;000
TWaI Funtling Sourees: - - 350,000 - 350,000
Capital F�cpendi6ures
Desigri - - 350,000 - 350,000
Riqht Of Wey - - - - -
Constructlon ' ' '
Total�ExpendiWrex - - 350,000 - 350,000
_ _ .-- ... . --
Forecasted Project Cost:
7ofal
2018 2079 .. 1020_ _._____2021.___.._. 20162021__ ...
Funding Sourtes
UnresMcted Shset Re�enue - 150,000 - 215,000
Grants,Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Local) - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000
REET 2 - - - - 110,000
Other(GRC) 150,000� 325,000
Total Funding Sourees - 1,500,000 - �-� 1,850,000
Capifal ExpenAi�res
Design - • - - 350,000
RigM.o/Way - - - - -
Construction - 1,500,000. - 1.500:000 .
Total ExpendiWres: - 1,500,000 - �-� f,950,000
42
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year.Capifal Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Re4enue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements(SE 312th to SE 318th) TIP# 40
Project No: astid0l
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager: TBD LOS Corridor ID#23
Description: - -- -
This projectwill fund the design,rightof-way acquisition,and construction of a four-lane section wiTh bicycle and pedestrian
facilities on 124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th Street The projecf will also fund improvemerds to the
, signalized intersection of SE 312th St and 124th Ave SE(including adding bike lanes,dual westbowd left-tum lanes,dual
soulhb:ound ttirough-lanes,a norihbound right-tumpocket,ffS improVemeMs,and pedestrian safety improvemer�ts).
Progress Summary: . - - - -
Phase 1 improvemerds between SE 318th and SE 316th were completed by GRCGin 2012.
__
_ . _
Future Impaef on Op@rating Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$3,500.
Activity: _ - — — --
2075 YE 2018 Year End
Funding:Sources Prlocto2015 Estimate 2016Bud et 2077�Bud8et Pro'ectTotal
UnresMcted Street Reeenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - - -
TraKrc Impact Fees • - - - -
Other • - - - -
Total FunGing Sources - - • - , -
Capital Expendihires
Design ' ' ' ' '
Right o/Way - - - - -
QOIIS�NCI%O!1 " ' ' " '
?otal FxpendiWres - - - - -
Forecasfad Project Cost:
?otal
. _ _1018- - -- -. __ 2018._---.. . 2020 2021_..___.__:2018r2021_ -
Funding Sources - . �-
Unrestncted Street Re�snue - - - - -
�rents-UnsecuredFederal 300,000 860,000 2,OOO,D00 - 3,180,000
TreKc Impact Fses 100,000 220,000 500,000 • 820,000
Other - - - - -
�Total Funding Sourees 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 • 4,000,000
Capital ExpentfiWreres
�BSI(JII 400,��U - - - 40�,��
RigMofWay - 1,100,OOD - - 1,700,000
ConSWCNon .._. . _ c . _ ._. __'_.._. Z,SOO,OOO__ . . e . 2.SOO,O00
Total FsperMiWres 400,000 7,100;000 2,500,000 • 4;000,000
43
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Fdcilities Plan
- - — - --- - --
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Fac�In�es e�an
S(x Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: R Street Bypass(M Street SE to SR-18) TIP# 41
Project No': cp�000c
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID#'N/A
Descrlptlon: - --
This project will complete the design and construction of the Bypass Rd,anarterial connection between M Street and
AutiumBlack'Diarriond Road,paralleling the rail line. The project will provide an arterial connection from tlie newty
constnicted M$treat Underpass to the Aub�m Black Diamond Road iriterchange with SR-18 to keepboth vehicular and
ireigM trafic out of 2sderrtal neighborhoods along RStreet SE north of the Stampede Rass line. The artedal connection
may also provide opportunities for partnering with the Muckleshoot tridian Tribe as they redevelop tFie Miles Pit area and as
more definitiee plans aredeueloped for a po4ential new 1NSDOT irrtert:fiange on SR,18 in the vicinity of ihe project
Progress Summary:
-- - - — -
- - - - -_
Future Impact on Operatlrig Budget:-
The armual maiMeronce cost for this project is estimated to be$2,500.
Aetivify: . -
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcea PAor to 2015 6Gmats M16 Budpat. 2017 Bud et Projoct 7ota1
Unrestncted S6eet Re�enue - - - . -
Grants-Secured(Fe4,Slate,Local) - - - - _
REET - - - _ _
TraKc Impect Fees - - - - -
OtirerSources(De�elopment) - - �
_ _ —
, Tofal Fu'itling Swircex - - _ _ _
Capifal ExpendihJres
Design ' - ', ' '
R/ghkolWay - - - - -.
ConsMiction �
Total.ExPentlFiures � - . - - . . . .._ ._ -
Foreeasteii Project Cost:
roml
2018 2019 2020___ ._ --1M1_ _ _'207fr2021
Funding Sources �. ._ . . . " - - - -�-�- ----
Unrestncted S[reet Revenue - - - - -
Grents-.Secured�(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -.
REET - -� - - _
TraNic Impact Fees ' ' - ' '
Other Sources(De�alopment) 500,000 500,000
Total Funding Sourcex - - - �SOO,O00 500,000
Capita��FspandiW'es
Design - - - 500,000 500,000
Right W Way - - - - _
ConsWction -
Torni��oa�wm� - _ _ soo,000 wo,000
44
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- ---
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital FaGlfties Plan,2016-2021 Special Reyenue Fund
Project Title: SE 320th Street 6orridor Improvements(116th Ave SE to 1Y1nt!Ave SE) TIP# 42
ProjecfNo: astidl9
Project Type: Capacky, Safety
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#25
Description:
SE 320th St is a primary route serving Green River Community College and adjaceM neighborhoods.There are very high
wlumes ofpedesfians,bicyclisis,and transit utiliang the cortidor.This projectwill fund the.design,ngMof-wayacquisition,
and construction of non-motorized roadway and safety improyements including a roundabout at 1161h Ave SE,addirig
bicycle laries,sidewalk's,and street lighdng between 122nd Ave SE and 1161h A�e SE.Project lengih is appropmately.45
miles.
Progress Summary:
GRCC completed 1he design and consVuction forihe segment between 124th Ave SE and 122nd Ava SE in2013.
Corridor design is scheduled to start in 2016.Construction is planned for 2020.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Activity:
2015 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sources: Prior to 2015 _ .E&Imate_ ..2016 Bud et 2017Bud�et. Pro eetTotal
Unreshicted Street Re�enue - - 10D,000� -"- -_ -- ��--"-��100;000�
Grents-Unsecured Federal - - - - _
T�c lmpact Fees - - - - -
PWTFL ' ' - ' '
Othei -
Total Funtiing Sourees: - - 100,000 - 100,000
Capita I�Ficpe ntlitures
Design - - 100,000 - 700,000
Rlght o/WaY ' ' ' - -
Construction - - -
, Totll Expendltures- - - �00;000 - 700,000
Forecasted ProJect Cost: -
7ota1
2078 2079 2020 2021 201620T1.
FunAing Sources
UmesMcted Street Re�vnue - - - - 100,000
G(ants-UnsecmedFederal 480,000 530,000 2,953,440 - 3,963,440.
T�c lmpact Fees 120,000 132,500 328,160 - 580,660
PWTFL ' ' _ - -
Other
Total Funding Sources: 600,000 662,500 3,281,600 - 4,644,100
CaD�I F�cpenditures
Design 600,000 250,000 - - 950,000
Right o/Way - 412;500 - - 412,500
Construction 3,261,600 - 3,281,600
Total Eic{iendlturex 600,000 662,500 3,287,600 - �4,644,100-
45
City ofAuburn Draft Capitql FacilitiesPlan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six YeAr Capkal Faoilities Flan,2076-2021 Specfal Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: Aubum Way South (SR=164) Corridor Safefy Improvements TiP# 43
Project No: cp1218 STIP#AUB-44
Project Type: Capacity, Safety
Project Nlanager. Matt Larson LOS Corridgr ID#4
Descdption:
This projectwill improve access managemerrt,includirg U-hans,upgrade trarisit stops and street lighlirig,wiiien to
accommodate turtNanes and,pedestrian and bicycle Tacilities,upgrade pavemerrt markings, install pedestrian§ignaJs and
audible pedestrian push buttons,antl upgrade traffic signals to change Uie ptiasing and to impro4e the yisibility of the signal.
heads.
Progress Summary:
Grant funding was awarded in 2012.
Future Impact on Operadng Budget: — - - --- — - -- -- - - --
This project will have no impact on Uie operating budget for street maintenance.
Activity: _
2075 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sources�. Priorto�2015 E4lmate 2078 Butlget 2077 Budget ProJectTotal
UnresMctebStieetRe�snue �2,768 - - - 2;768
Grants-Secmed(Federal) 98,470 462,000 1;772;638 - 2;333,108
TraKc Impact Fees - - �280,000 - �250,OD0
WSDOT(Fede21) - - 306,674 - 30G,674
Other
Total Funding Soureas. �107,238"� ��" 462,000- � 2:329,312�� � - 2;892;550
Capifal,Expenditurex
Design 101,238 374,000 - - 475,238
RigM o/Way - 88,000 - - 88.000
Construction - 2;329,3�2 2,329,312
Tota.l_Ficpandltures 101,238 462,000 2;329,312 - 2,892:SS0
Foreeasted Project Cost:.
Total
2018 2079 2020 2021 201C.202�
Funding Soutees - _ - . .. .__-_____._ _—.___ . _ __ __ _ ... :
Unrestdcted Street Rewnbe - - - - -
Grants-Secured(Federalj - - - - 1:772,838
TiaKc lmpact Fees - - - - .250,000
WSDOT(Fede21) - - - - �306,674
ana� -
Tofal Funding�Sourees • - - - 2,329,3��
Capltal F�ipenditures
. . Design ' ' _ ' '
Right o/Way - - - - -
Construetion �2,329,3'12
Toa,(Ezpendltures. -� - �- - 2;329,312
46
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- -- -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital.Facilrties Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Re,venue Fund
ProjectTtle: 124fh Avenue SE 8 SE 284th Street Intersection Safety Improvemen4s TIP#45
ProjectNo: CPXXXX
ProjectType: Capacity,Safety
Project Marcager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#xz
Description: - -
This projectwill complete the design phase for iMersecUon safetyand capacity improvemerds.
Prog�ess Summary:
Future Irnpact ori Operating Budget:
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcex Prior to 2075 Estimete 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProjeetTotal_.
UnresMcted Street Re�enue - - - - -
Grents-Secured(Fed.State,LocaQ - . - . _
TreNic/mpact Fees - - - 100,000 -
REET2 ' - - - '
Othei - - - . .
Total Funding Sources� " - - - 100,000 -
Capital Expendihires.
Design - - - 700,000 -
Right of Way - - _ . .
Construction - - -
romi��oaimres - - - �oo,000 -
Forecasted Project CosY.
Total
. 2078 2019 2020 2021 _ 20162021
FunHing Sources � � - - � -
UnresMcted Street Revenue - - - . _
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) 450,000 - - - 450,000
Tre�c Impact Fees 750,000 - - - 250,000
REET2 - - - - -
Other - - . _
Tofal Funding Sources 600,000 - - • - �700,000�
Capital Expenditures
Design - - - - 100,000
Rightof Way 50,000 - - - 5p,ppp I
ConsWcfion 550,000 �- - - 550,000
Total ExpendiWrex - -600,000 . .. - . - - 700,000
47
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Flan
-- -- _
--- - - -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FacihOtes Plan
Six Year Capitaf Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 . __ Special Revenue Fund
- -
Project Title: Traffie Mariagement Center Improvements TIP# 47
Project No: asbdl0
Project Type: Capacity, ITS
Project Manager. Swtt Nutter lOS Corridor ID# N!A
- - - -
Descriptbni -
The rapid growth of the Cirytraffic sigrnal and V�telligeM Transportation Systems infrasVucture has se�,erely strained ihe
capacity and reliabiliry of the e�dsting network processing capabilities.This pfbjeot will,implemerit nelwork commimicaUons,
sotiw�are,video,arid physical improve:merds to the Tra.ific,ManagemeM CeMer which will impro�;e the network�data
processing speed,reliability;and redundancy improvirg the Ciiys abilityto manage the transportation system and respond
to emergericies.Adtlitionaly,these improvementwill allow InFortnation&Technologystaffto isolate the Tratfic Managemerit
data processing demarids from ttie Ci_tys gener-aJ facili_ty securily data processing�demarids resulting in improvements to
both'prooesses. _ _
_ _ -
- - —
Progre§s Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Bud'get:
- - - - - --
There is rio impact to ttie street maiMenance butlget
Activ'rty:
ZO75 YE 2076 Year End
FundingSources Bdorto2075 .ESlmate._ . . .20188uOget___�17_Budget_ ProectTofal
UnresMcted Sheet Fte�enue - � - - - -
G2nts,Secuied(Fed,State.Loca!) - - - - -
TraKc lmpect Fees - 125.000 25,000 - 150,000
PWTFL • - - - -
Oflier
Total Funding Sources - 725,000 25,000 - 150,000
Capiml EzpendiNres
Design - 25,000 - - 25.000
Rlghtb/Way - - - -
Constn�cHon� . 100,000 25,000 '125,000
Total6ipenditu�ras - 725.000 25,000 - 150.000
Forebasted Project Cost:�
Total
2018 2079 _ 2020- - . - -2021 -- - - �2016-2021
. . . _ _ _ .. _. . .
FunAing Sources - �
UniesMcted Slreet Re�snue - - - - -
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - . -
Tra�c lmpact Fees - - - - 25,000
. .. . - � PWTFL - ' ' ' '
ane.
Total Funiling Souroes: � �-.- . .�. --- -- --�--�- - � � --25.000
Capiml�pendltures
Desl9n ' ' _ ' '
Rrghl o(WeY _ ' ' ' '.
Consbuction 25,000� ...
Total.Expendituresi - - - - 25,000-
48
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: West Valley Highway Improvements (15th Sfreet NW to W Main Street) TIP# 49
Project No: asbdl3
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#35
Description: -
This project scope includes pavement rehabilitation and rechannelization,roadway widening,bicycle lanes,pedestrian
facilities,roadway lighting,required stortn system improvemeMs,and tr�telligentTransportation System Improvements.
Progress Summary:
Survey,base mapping and pre-design are planned to be completed in 2018 to complete preliminary pians and refirie
project cost-estimate.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Aetivity:
�2015 YE. 2076 Year End
Pumling Soureex Prlor to 2075 E9imate 2D18 Budget 2077 Budget Pro ect Tofal
UnresVicted.Street Revenue - - _ . _.
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,�State,Local) - - _ _ _
Tra�c Impact Fees - - - - -
Tofal Funding Sources - � - - - .- ..,
Capital Ezpenditures
Design - - _ _ _
Right o/Way - - _ _ _
Construction - - _ _ .
Tofal EzpendiWrea - • • - �� �� ' '
Forecasted Project Cos(:
Total
3018 2079 2020 2021_ _ _. 20162021
Funding�Sour�s � � �- - --��
Unresbrcted S[reet Re�enue - - _ _ _
Grants-Unsecwe_d(Fe.d,Sfate,Local) - 480,000 2,400,000 - 2,860,000
TraKrc/mpact Fees 100,000 120,000 600,000 - 820,000
TotalFundingSources:� �� -100,000� � -600,000 3,000,000 - 3;700,000
Capital EzpendiWres
Design 100,000 600,000 - - 700,000
Right of Way • . _ _ �� �_�
Constivction - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
Total ExpendNures -'100,000 600,000 3,000,000 - 5,700,000
49
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap�tal Faciitt�es Plan
Six Year Capifal Faclitles Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Froject TiUe: Lake Tapp§ Parkviray ffS Exparision TIP# 51
Project No: asbdl7
Projec4 Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#10
Descrlption:
The projec4furnis tlie design,coordination,pertnitting,and construction of new tr�telligentTransportation System(RS)
infras4uctune along Lake Tapps Parkway from Lakeland Hills Way to East Valley Highway,and along East,Valley Highway
ro Lakelarxl HiIlsWay.Theproposed ffS iMrastructure includes conduit,fiber,VMS signage,cameras,network
communication upgrades,and weather statioru along the route.
_ - - -- -- -- ---
Progress Summary: � �
Federal GraM application was submitted;o PSRC in May 2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
The armual mairrtenance costforthis project is estimated to be$5,000.
Actidlly:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSouices Pdorto2015 Estlmate 20168uCget_ . .2077_Budget. _ P.rojeetTofal _
UnresMcted 8freet.Reosnue . . _ ._ - � �-- - - - - - -- . .. - - - -. __ . . - -- - �
Grants-UnsecuredFedeial - - 82,950 711�,000 82,950
REET ' ' ' ' '
T2�c Impact Fees - - 22A50 189.000 22,050
Othe� - -
Tofal Funding Sources -- ��- � � - � ----- �105;000"�- - - �400;000- - - -�705;000
Capital FxpendiWres
Design - - 105.000 - 105.000
RlghhofWay - - - - -
Construction - 900,000
Tofal FxpendiGires: - - 105,000 900,000 705;000
_ _ _ _ ____ _ ' __
Foreoasted Project Costi
Toml
2018 2019 �2020 2021 2016-2021
Fdnding Sources - _. ._ ..__ _-.—_-_.._ :
UnresMcted Street Reosnue - - - -� -
. . . .. _ _ . . _ _.
Grants-.Unsecured Federal - - - - 793;850
REET - - - - -
T�c Impact Fees - - - - 211;050
Other -
Total Funding Sources: - . - - - - �-7.00S,000
Capital 6xpendiWres-
Design - - - - 105,000
RightdWaY - - �- ' -
Conshuction - - 900,OU0
Total ExpendiWres:� - �• - • 7,005,000
50
City ofAuburrz Draft Capitkl Fkcilities Plan
_ _-
----- _ -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FacilkiesPlan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Projegt TiUe: A SVeet SE 8 Lakeland Hills Way SE Intersection$afety&Capacity Imp. TIP# 52
Project No: asbdl5
ProjectType: Capac_ity,Safety
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#�cx
Description:
This projectwill shxly 6raffic operations,safety,and prepare a preliminarydesign intersection improvements.
Progress Summary: -
Analysis,preliminarydesign,antl construction cost estimate will be completed in 2016.Future phases will be programmed
as fimding becomes available.
Future Impact on Operating Budget: "
This project will have no impact on the operating tiudget for street maintenance.
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSources Pdotto2015 Estimate �20166udget 2017Budget ProjectTota�
UnresMcted Street Rerenue = -- - - - " - � - - _
Grents-Secured(Fed;State,Locap - - - - -
TraNic Impaet Fees ' - - 75;000 - 75,000
REEM - - - . _
Other -
- -� .... ._._. - . -
To}al Funding Souree3: • - 75,000 - -75,000�
Capital ExpendiWres
Design - - 75,000 - 75,000
Right o(Way • - - - _
Conshuction - -
Tofal bcpendiluies - - 75,000. - - �75;000
Forecasted Project Cost:
7ofa I
.1018. 2019 2020 2021 201&Z021
Funding Soureex " - - ��
Un2stricted Streef Revenue - - _ _ _
Grents-Secured(Fed,State,Locel) - - _ _ _
TraNic Impact Fees • - - - 75,000
REET2 - - _ _ _
O[her - - _ _ _
Total Funding Sources - "� - �" �� . - - 75,000
Capital F�cpenditures
Design - - - - 75,000' .
Right o/WaY - - - - -
Construction - - - _
Total Expenditures �-� . - . 75,000�
51
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - -- - - -- -
----- _-- --- —
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capha�Faen�ties p�an
SlxYearCapital.Faclllfies.Plan,;2016r2027 __ Capital ProJects Fund
Proje.otTitle: Auburn Way South and 12th Street SE Interseetion Impro4emeirts TIP# 53
Project No: cp1114
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#3
- - - _ _ _ _
- — - -
Desoriptbn:
The project wiil design and constrvct multi-modal intersection improvements at the AWS/12fh Street SE iMeYsection.The
improvements will inolude pedesfian access,bicycle lanes,signal phasing and timing,and ffS upgrades:
Progress Summary:.
Design is scheduled to be completed in 2016.
Future Impact on OperaGng Budget:
This project will have:ra impact on the operating budget for street maiMenance.
Activity:
� 2075YE 2018 Vear End
Funding SourceS� _-Prlor to.2015_. .. E4lmate_ 2078 BuEget 2017 Budget ProJaeCTotal
Un2sMcted Sheet Rewnue � - - - 100.000 - 100,000
Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - 750,000 -
REET2 - - - - -
TraHic Impact Fees - 50,000 - - 50,000
Other - -
Tofal Funtling Sources�. - 50.000 100,000 750,000 �150,000
Caplfal ExpentllWres �
Design - 50,000 100,000 - 150,000
Right o/WaY ' ' _ ' '
Construc[ion - 750,000
Total Expenditures:� - 50,000 �100,000 750,000 �150,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tota�
2018 .2019 - - --2020-_ _._. _ 2027 20162027
Funding Sources �� � � � � �
UnresMcted Sheet Rewnue - - - - 100,000
GraMs-UnsecuredFeqe21 - - - - �750,000
REET2 - - - - -
TraNc Impact Fees - - - - -
an�r - -
Total Funding Sourees - - � - • 850,000
Capifal ExPendlWres
Design - ' ' ' 100.000
RigAt ol WaY - - - _ .'.
Constniction - 750,000
Tofal ExpendlWres - - - - 850,000 -
52
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
---- - . —
ARTERIAL STREET'FUND (102) Capital FacilitiesPlan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Specfal Revenue Fund
ProjeciTille: Kersey Way SE Corridor Study TIP# 54
Projec4No: asbd11
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#4
Description:
Thisproject will stucly improvemeMg to the Kersey Way SEcorndor from the White River Bridge to the southem city limits.
The studywill develop�thescope and costs fo7 honwntal/derticaFgeomefic roatlway improvemer�ts,provide roadside
hazard mitigation,sVeet lighting and rmn-motorized trail construction.The project length is approbmatelytwomiles.
Progress Summary:
Design will begin in 2015 following the completion of the updafe to the Comprehensive Plan.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
Thisprojectwill have no impact on the operatingbudgetfor SVeet maintenance.
Activity: . . ��.._.- --
2075 YE 2018 Year End
FundingSources. Priorto2075 Estimate 2018Budget 201FBudget ProjectTofal
UnresMctetl Street Rei�snue - - - - -
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Tia�c Mitigation Fees - - 50,000 - 50,000
� O(her - - - - -
Total Funding Sources. - " - � � - � � �-"50;000� � � • � �-50,000
Capital.Espendi W res�
Des/gn - - 50,000. - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - -
Construction - -
Total EzpentliWrex - - 50;000� "- � _ -" -�-"- "50,000
Foreoasted Broject Cost:
rotai
2ois zo�a za2o 202� 2ois-2oz�
Funtling Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revanue - - - - -
Grants-Secured(FedState,Locaq - - - - -
T�c�tigation Fees - - - - 50,000
Other(De�sloper)' - -
TotalFuntlingSources: � - �� -�� � � -� � � � � = �� � -��� �-50,000-
Capital ExpendiWres:
Design - - - - 5U,000
Right o/WaY _ ' ' ' '
Constmctlon - - - - -
Total EzpendiWres: - - - - 50,000
53
City of Auburn Draft Cqpital Facil.ities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facillties Plan
Six Year Capital FacilRies Plan,2016-2021 Special,Rev.e_n_ue_Fund
ProjectTipe: W Main Street MuRimodal Corridor and ITS Improvements TIP# 55
R�oject No: cp1415
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager: Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 11
Desy�ip;ion:
Thisprojectwill�,repu;i�p.ose�lheepstirig�W Main�SYcorridor�withinAubum'sdesignated.RegionaLGrowfhCeMerandwill.
corrstructlrrtelligerrtTransportation System(fTS)improvemeMs serwng local arid regional transpor[ation networksand a
majoc commerciaPretail cerrtecJmprowmerds-include.cornerting the ebsting four-lane roadway section to a three-I.arie
�_section includi.ng ceritertwo-way left turn lane with new bike lanes,new sidewalks, new LED street lighting,and streetscape
improvements between West Valley�Highway arid,the liiterurban Trail. fTS ImprovemeMs include in4erconnecti.ng and
:coord�inating traffic signals From G�St NW�along W�Main St to�W ValleyHighway soutFS to�151h�St�SW incluiiing two
�.iirterchanges with�.SR=18and.one with SR-167.
_ .._ ..____ _... .. - -
Progress Summary:
'Federal:grari4 was�secured in 2014.Arterial Presenation Fund 105 is participating in the pavement rehabilitation porUon of
this.project. � �
- �-- - -----
_. _ . . _ . .. _._.. .
Future Impacfon Operating Budgeti � -
Thisprojectwill�have no impact on the operating budgetfor street maiMenance.
Activlty: �
2015 YE 20�6 Year End
FundingSource_s Pdorto2015 Estlmate 20�BBud9et 20176udget. Projec[Tofal
UnresWcted Sheet Re�nue - 56,490 - - 56,490
Grants-SecuretlFederel - 804,100 2,g70,240 - 3,T/4,340
REET �- - � - �� .
TreKrc.lmpactFees - 209,650 - 209,650
Other(ArlenalPreservation�Funtl105) 85,410 314,510 .399,920
Tofal Funding Sourcas�. - 946,000 3;494,400 - 4,640,C00
Capifal Ex{iendidires:
� Design - 946,000 - - 946,000
�Riglit of Way - � - � - � � -_�-
Construction - 3.494,400 3,494,400
�Tofal.ErzpendiWres: - 946,000 3,494�400 - 4;440,400
Fqrecasted P�ojecf.Costi
Total
2018 20'18_. _ . __._2020_ _ ._... 2021 20162021
Funding5ources . - ._'.___ . ____.__—_. ._.____.._
Unrestricted Street Reoenue - - - -
Grants-Secu2d Fede2l ' ' ' ' 2;970:240
REET - - - - - -
T�c/mpact Fees - - - - �209,850
Other(Artena/Preservafion Fund f05) - .314;510
Tota(FundingSources�. - - - - 3;494;400
Ca�pifal Expenditures
Desi9� ' _ ' _ _
Right.o/-Way ' ' ' ' -
COl15lNCf1011 �.sy�Q.QQO .
Total Expendimres: - - - �-� 3,494,400
54
City ofAuburn 17raft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capita�FaciriEies Plan
Six Year Capital Facflkfes Plan,2016-2021 Spedal Revenue Fund
Project Title: Evergreen Heghts Safe Routes to School ImprovemeMs TIP# 56
ProjectNo: asbdl4 STIP�F.AUB-39
Project Type: Capacity, Non-Motorized
Project Menager. TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
The project will widen S 316th Street from 51 st Avenue S to tlie west of ttie E�,ergreen Elemer�tary�School frorrtage,antl
56th Aeernie S between S 316th Street and S 318th Street.The proposed widening will allow the addition of tiike lanes and
sidewalks on both sides of the street to match the ebsting roadway cross-section to the east of the school.A.roundabout
will be constructed atthe�S 316fh SVeeU561hAvenue�S intersection replacing the ewsting all-waystop-co_flVofand�tlre
sphool driveway will be relocated to Uie west to align vuith the roundab�ou[.The reconstruction of S 316th Street includes the
vertical alignmerrt of the epsting roadway along the schooffrontage which createssigM-distance problemsassociated with
the school driveways,and at the iMersection with 56th Avenue S.Other�project elements include undergroundi.ng:of aerial
utilities,.street li htin ,arid u rades.to ttie storin water.s� tem. _ . _ _ _ .
. . _. _ ._ _ _.. . _ _ . _. _. . . _ .
Progiess Summary::
Desigh phase Grantfunding applicationwas submitted in May2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget: - � � �
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
. ACtivify: . . . . . . .. _
2075 VE 2018 Year End
FunEingSourcex PAorto.2075 .Estlmate. 2016Budget 2077�BuCget Broe'ctTotal
UnrestNcted Street Reosnue - - - - -
Grents-Unsecured Fedeial - - - - -
TraH7c Impact Fees - - - - -
REE72 - - - - -
O[he� -
Total Funding Sources:� - - - - -
Capital.Expentlitures:
Design - - - - -
R/gAt of Way - - - - -
Consfn�ctlon - - - -
Tofal F�cpantllWres:. ' ; ' ' "
Forecasted Project Cost:
Toml
2018 2018 '2020 2027 '2016-2021
Funding Soutces
UnresWcfed Street Rewnue - 118,500 84,500 693,000 896,000
Grents-Unsecurerl Federel - 671,500 478,500 3,927,000 5,077,000
. . . . . . . .... . ..
TroKc lmpact Fess - - - - -
REE72 - - - - -
Other
Toml Funding Sources - �790,000 563,000 4,620,000 5,973,000
CapNal ExpendiNres:
Design - 790,000 - 790,000
R7gMo/Way - - 563,000 - 563,000
Consnuction 4,620,000 4,620,000
Total ExpenEiNres: - �790,000 563,000 4,620,000 5,973,000
55
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capitai Facilities Plan
8ix Year Caplfal Faclli[fes Plan;20162021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Aubum Way S Corridor Improvements(Fir St SE to Hemlock St Sfp TIP# 58
Projed No: cp1119 STIP7R AUB-38
Project Type: CapacRy
Project.Manager Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID#4
_
Description: -- - -- ----
This:project will widen Aubum Wey South between Fir St SE and Hemlock St SE to five lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalks,
illumination and storm improvemeMs.A newtraffic signal will be constructed at Hemlock'Street SE and connectto Autium's
Intelligent Trensporfation System.
Progress Summary:.
Washington State Transportation Improvemerrt Board(TB)awarded fhe CitygreM funds in the amouM of$2;426,400 on
November 19,:2010.The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe is a project partner and is coMributlng ROW dedicadons and project
furxlin in the amount$836,601.
Future lmpact on Operating Budget: _ . - - - -
This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$9,300.
Activily:
2015 YE 20�6 Year End
Funding�3ourced: .P,rior ro 2015_ Eaflriieta 2076 Budgat 2017 Budget ProJect Tofal
UnrestnctedStreefRewnue� --- -195;060 - ." ..-.- _.-.... - - ' 1A5:060
Grants-.SecuredStare 508,176 1,977,226 - . - 2,425;402
Tra%Ic Impsct Fees 200,000 450,000 - - 650,000
Other(ComcestCenturyLinkJ 21,731 215,362 - - 237.093
Other�Sources(WSDO'n - N6,038 - -� 116;038�
Othe�(MI'n 173,382 663,219 836,601
TMalFunding3oureex --- �-� 7;098,349-� 3;361�,845 - - 4;460,196
Cepltal F�cpendiWrea
. _. . _ . .. __ ..... .
Design 666.677 106.365 - - 772,g82
Right o/Way 437,732 - - - 437,732�.
Constn�ction , - 3,255,480 - 3,255;480
Total ExPendih�rex - 1;098;349 3.581.845 • - 4.460,194
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
2078 2019 _ Z020. ___ _ 2021. . 20762021
Funding Sourees - � - - -- � - ------- -.. _.. .
UnresMcted 8heet Re�nue - - - - -
Giarits-Secured State - - - - -
T�c ImpacfFees - - - - -
Other(Mln - -�
Total Funding Sources - - - � � ---��- --- -" - -
Capital ExpandlN_res:.
Design ' _ ' _ '
Right of Way ' - ' - -
� Constructiar -
Total Fxpenditurea .. - - . �-� .
56
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Ave NE &3rd St NE Pedestrian &Access Improvements TIP# 59
Project No: cp1023
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#2
__ _ . . . _
Description: - "_
This projec[will improve access, safelyand operations for pedestrian,bicyclists and motorized�ehicles at the intersections
of 3rd St NE/Aubum Ave,40i St NE/Aubum Ave,and 4th St NE/Aubum Way North. Improvemerris include a new tratfic
signal at 3rd St NE to add a missing pedesVian crossing arxl accommodate the rroAhbound left-tum mo�,emeM;improving
pedestrianfacilities to meetADA requirements,restricting uncontrolled accesses neaathe iMersection,and modifying the.
trafficsignal atAutium Way North and 4)h St NE to eliminate the easUwe§t split ptiase operation.
Progress Summary:.
Survey and pre�esign were started in 2010-2011. Pre-design,willbe completed in 2017,with construction scheduled for
2018,pen[ling grantfunding.
Future Impacfon Operating Budget
This project will liave ra impact on the operetirig b�dget fo:r street maiMenance..
Activity:
2015 VE 2016 Year End
Funding5ources: Priorto2015 EeGmate 2016Budget 2017_Budget_. _ProJectSofal_
UnresMcted Street Reosnue 8,778 - - - � � -"-8;778�
Granfs-Unsecured(Fed,Stete,LoceQ - - - - -
TraHic lmpact Fees - - - 50,000 -
REET2 - - - - � -
Ot/rer -
Total Funding Sourcea 8,778� - - � 50,OOD 8,778
Capital 6cpentliWree:
Design 8,778 - - 50,000 8,778.
Righf o/Way - - - - -
Constmctfon
Total Erzpenditures: 8,778 - - 50,000 8,778
Forecasted ProJect Cost: � � "- �-" -
Total
2018 20'19 2020 2021 2016-2021
Funding Sources
UnresMcted Straet Revenue - - - - _.
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,LoceQ 250,000 - - - 250,000
TraKc lmpect Fees 50,000 - - - 100,p00
REET2 - - - - -
Otlrer - - _ _.
Total Funding Sourcea 300,000 - - �� - � -35p,ppp-.
Caplfal F�cpendlWrea
Design - ' - ' S0.000
Right of Wey - - - _
Constmction 300,000 - - .300,000.
Total Expendidirea �300;000 �-� - - � 350,000
57
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapkalFacilities Plan
Slx Year Cap'italFac'ilkies Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project TiUe: M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to AWS) TIP# 60
Project Na cp�000c
Project Type: Capacity
Project Managec TBD LOS Corridor ID#6
Description:
Widen M Street SEinto;a mul�-lane arterial behveen 8th St SE and AWS. This projec4will improra mobility and is tied to
cortidor developmen[. tt is corsisteM wifh the Comprehensi�,e Plan and contributes to ttie completion of a northisouth
arterial cortidor.
Progress Summary:
— - - -- - --- _ _ __
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This annu�aJ maintenan¢e cost for thig project is estimated to be$8,000.
— -- --- - - - .
Activky:.
- 2015 YE 20'IB Year Eiid
Funtling Sources: Prforto 2015 EstlmeU 2016 Budget 20'17 Budgef ProJecf Tofal
Unrestncted Sheet Re4enue - - - - -
G(ants-Unsecured(Fed,�State,Local) - - - - -
T�c Impact Fees - - - - -
REE72 ' ` - �` -
aneK�e�ero�men�! - - - - -
Total�FunEingSourcex - - - - -
Capital�6cpenditurex
Desl9� - - - - -
RightolWaY - ` - -� -
Cons6uct7on
ToTal Expandltures - - - - -
Forecasted Project Cost: _ . - - — -
7otal
2016 2019 2020 2021 201&2021.
Funtling3ources - - - . . . . � . .- _ ..
Unrestricted�Sheet Rewnue - �- - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,LocaQ - 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675;000
T�c Impact Fees - 750,000 750,000 - 1�,500,000
REET2 - - - -
orneh���oP,�,e�r� - zso,000 zso,aoo - soo,000
Total Funding Sourcea - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - B,675,000
Ca pita I-Ex pe n d i tu re a
Design - 650,000 - • 650,000
Rlght of Way - 1,275,000 - - ��,275,000
Constructlon 4,750,000 4,750,000
Tofal F�ipendittirea - 1�,925,000 4;750,000 • 6,675,000
58
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capital Facilities Pian
Siz Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Spe"sial Revenuefund
ProjectTiUe: SR-18 to Auburn Way South (SR-164) Bypass TIP# 6'1
Project No: cp�000c
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Description:
This project will pertnit and construct a new iMerchange at SR-18 and over a mile of new classified roadway connecting fhe
new iMerchange W Aubum Way South(SR-164).This project will create.a new road connecting SR-16 and SR=164 to
bypass Aubums urban center senring tha Muckleshoot Reservation and regional traffic to the Enumclaw area.
Progress Summary:
This project was originally analyzed by WSDOTs Aubum Way South(SR-164)Route DevelopmeM Plan.The State
Legislature allocated$15 Million for the new.eastbound SR-18,offdamp senring this bypass road in 2017-2019.The
Muokleshoot Indian Tribe is anticipated to donate the property necessaryto aacommodate the off-ramp and connec6ng
road to Aubum Way South.The route of the new roadway will be detertnined after completion of a feasibility study.
Futu�e Impact on Operating Budget
This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$37,500.
Activity: . . ._- - � - - — � --�-
2015 YE� 2016 Year End
Fundfng Sources: Prior M 2015 ESimate 2016 Butlget 2017 Budget ProJeet Total
Unrestncted Street Re�nue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,Stete;Loca!) - - - - -
TreNic Impact Fees - - -� - -
Other(WSDOT) - - - 1,000,000 -
Other(MIT) -
Tofal Funtlln8 Sources: - - - 1,000,000 -
Capltal Expendidirex
Design - - - 7,000,000 -
Right o/Wey - - - - -
Cons[ruCtion
Total Expenditures .. . - - - - 7.000.000. . -".. .. - .
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
rotal
2018 2019 2020 2021 201G,2021
Funding Sourses -
Uniestncted StreetRevenue - - - -
Grants-Unsecuied(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
TreNic Impect Fees - - - - -
Other(WSDOT) 1,500,000 72,500,000 - - 15,000,000
Other(MfT) 2,000,000 5,000.000 7,000,000
Total FunAing Sourcex - 17,500,000 -� - 22.000,000
Capkal Expendihnex
Design 1,500,000 - - - 2,500,000
Right o/Wey 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000
Consfrucfion - 17,500,000 17,500,000
Total Expendiwrex 3,500,000 17,500,000 - - 22,000,000
59
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Sbc Year Capkal Facilities Plan,201Cr2021 Special Revenue.Fund
Project Title: 29th St SE/R St SE Intersection Improvements TIP# 63
Project No: �pppp�
Project Type: Gapacity
Project Manager: ?BD LOS Cor�idqr ID#16, 27
Descrlption:
This projec;funds the design,right-of-way acquisition and construction of intersection rapacity and safety improvements af
the 291h'StSE/R St SE intersection.
Progress Summary:.
Future Impaet on�Operating Budget:��
This project will have.no impact on the operating budget for sVeet maiMenance.
Activky:
2015 VE 2076 Year End
Funding Sources: Prior to 2075 Fstlmate_. . .1018 Butlget_ _2077 Budget__FroJeetTof51
UnrestncteU Street Rewnue - - - - _-
Grants-Unsecurod(Fed,State,LocalJ - - - - -
Tieffic Impact Fees - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Other - -
Total Funifing Sairces: - - - - -
Caplfal�ExpenCitqrea
Design ' ' ' _. '
Righto/Way - - - -� -
Construction - - -
romr���ain,�� - - - - -
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
rotal
2018 2019 2020 2027 - 201H-2027
FunEing Sourcex
Unrestncfed Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,LocelJ - 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000
Tia//ic Impact Fees - 500,000 - - �500,000
REET - - - - -
Olher ' ' - '
Tofal.Funtling Sources - 1,900,000 - �- 1,800,000
Capltal Expendlturex
Design - 350,000 - - 3b0,000
Right of Wey - 450,000 - - 450,000
ConStnNCllon - 1,000�000 .. .:. ._.. .__.__.__"_ _ ___1,000.000.
Total.ExpendiWres: - 1,800,000 - - 1;800,000
60
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
---- _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) caPrta�Fac�ni�es P�a:n
Siz Year Capital FacfllUes Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenuefund
ProjectTitle: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th PI SEj TIP# 64
Project No: asbdl8
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#19
Description:
Widen the epsting roadwayto provide a four-lane cross section pedestrian and bicycle facilities.The project includes
widening the Green River Bridge.
Progress Summary:
Two parcels along the future roadway alignment were procured in 2014.Comdor preilesign efFort is planned to begin in
late 2015 following adoption of the Comprehensioe Transportation Plari major update.
Fufureimpact on Operating Budgeti
This annual maintenance cost for ihis project is estimated to be$18,300
Activity:
2015 YE. 20'IB Year End
Funding Sources PAor to 20'15 Fstimate 2076 Budget . .20tt Budpet Pro ectSotel.
Unrestncted�SMeet Rewnue - - - - -�� - _ �— — ��- -
Grants-Unsecwed(Fed,Stafe,Local) - - - • -
Tia�c Impact Fees 409,025 50,000 100,000 - 559,025�
Otlrer . . . . . . .
Tofal Funding Sources 409,025 50,000 100,000 �- 559,025
Capital Ezpenditures:
Desi9n - 50,000 '100,000 - 150,U00
Rlght o/Way 409,025 - - - 409,025
ConsWcfion
' Total ficpenditures 409,025 50,000 100,000 - � 559,025�
Forewsted Project Cost:
Tofal
2018 �2018 2020 2027 20'162021
Funding Sources:
UnresMcted Streef Revanue - - - -
.. . . .. .... _..
Grants-Unsecuretl(Fed,Stete;Local) 1,950,000 6,000,000 - - 9,950,000
Tia�c Impact Fees 500,000 2,000;000 - - 2,600,000
Other - - -
Total Funding Sourees �2,450.000 70,000,000 • - 12,550,000
Capltal ExpendlWres
Design 1,950,000 - - - 2,050,000
Right d Way 500;000 - - - 500,000
Construction . 10,000,000 - 10,000,000
= -
Total Expenditures: ��2,450;000 10,000;000-� = -"- �- - 12,550,000
61
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
--- _ _. . - - -- - - -
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilitles Plan
SizYear Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment2(105th PI SE to 112th Ave SE) TIP# 65
Project No: op�000t
Projegt Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#18
- _ _
_,. ... ._.._
-- -_ _ . _
Deswiption:
Project includeswidening the ebsting roadwayto provide a four-lane cross-section inoluding pedesfian and bicyole
facilities.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
'fhis annual maintenance cost forthis project is estimated to be$24,100.
Activity: _
2015 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSources Pdorto2015 . E4lmate 20166udget 201TBud8et PFoject7otal
UnresMctedStreetRewnue . . .- - �-- -- - - .�... _ .'---�----�---... ._ _. __.. . _ ._- _-
Grants-�Unsecured(Fed;State,Local) - - - - -
T�af(k Impact Fees - - - - -
OtAer - - - -
_ _ � - � - -- - _ __ _. . _ . - -
Toml FunCing Sources - • • - -
Ceplpl FxpendiWre�
Desi9n ' ' ' ' '
Right oI Way - - - - -
ConsWction - - -
Total ExpendiL�res - - - - -
� - - -— - - - -- - - -- -___._
Forecasted Project Cost:
_ . _.. . . Tofal
2018 2019 _ 2020 2027. 2016'-2021
FundingSourees .. . . .-.. _ ._ .._ _ _ . __ ____.._:_�. _. _ __.
Uniestdcted�SlreetReSenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed;State,Locaq - - 2,900,000 �7�,700,000 �10,000,000�
7reHfc Impect Fees - - 600,000 7,400,000 2,000,000
OMer - - - -
Total Funding Sourcex - - 3,500,000 8,50.0,000 12,000,000
Capital E+cpe_ndiWres �
Design - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
RigfitWWay - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000
Canstruction - - - 8,500,000 8,500,000
Total ExpendiWres: - - 3,500,000 8,50_0,000 12,000,000
62
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- --._._.. -
ARTERIAL STREET FOND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
SizYearCapital Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3(712th Ave SE to 124th.Ave SE ) TIP# 66
Pmject No: cp�000c
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#19
Description: ___ _ _ _
Project includes widening the ebsting roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle
facilities.
Progress Summary: -
Futurelmpact on Operating Budget:
This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$20,300.
Activity:
2015 YE� 3076 Year End
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 Estlmate 20'16 Budget 2017 Budget ProjettTofal
Unrestncfed Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - .
� Trallic Impact Fees - - - - -
Other - - - -
Total Funding Sources - - - - -
Capital ExpendlWres
Design - - ' - -
Ri9ht o/WaY " " " ' _
�.OIISfNCti011 - - - -
Total Fnpendi4ires - - . �-� .
Forecasted Project Cost:
Totel
2018 2018 2020 2027 20162021
Funding Sources:
Unrestncted Street Rewnue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Locaq - -� 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
T�c Impact Fees - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000
Other - - -
Tofal Fundfng Sources - - 1;000,000" 3;OU0,000 - 4,000,000
Capipl Expenditures '
Design - 500,000 - • 500,000�
� Right o/Way - 500,000 -. - 500,000
Constmction - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
Total ExpenAfWres --� ` - " - "7,000,000-"��" 3,000,000 - - 4,000,000
63
City of Auburn Drajt Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapitalFacilitleSPlan
Six Year Capital FacilRles Plan,2018-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: 22nd Street NE& I St NE Intersecfio� TIP # 69
Project No: ep1513
ProjectType: Capacity(SaFety) �
ProjectM"anager: TBD LOS Corridor ID#21
Descriptfon: - - - - -
This projed includes tlie design ar7ii eonstruotion of a modem roundabout at the 22nd Street NE and 18treet,NE
iidersection.This is curreMly a 4-way stop cpntrolled irrtersection;
Progress Summary:.
State grarrt was awarded tor design in 2015. Construction phase is dependent on securing fuWre granls or other local
fiu�ding. . _
Future]mpact on:Ope►ating Budggt:
There is no impact to tlie street mairitenarice budget.
_ _
Activity:
2015 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sources: Priorto2D15 EsGmate 2078 Budga! 2017 Budget ProjectTotal
UnresMeted StreeLRe�nue - - - - -
GraMs-Secu2dState - 76U,000 40,000 - 200,000
Giants-Unsecured Federal 940,000 �
T2Kc ImpacPFees - 40,000 15,000 235,000 �55;000
REET2 ' ' ' ' '
Other - - - -
Total Funding Sources�. • '200,000 - "55,000� 1,775,000" - 255,000
Cepitel.ExpendiWres
Pre-Design - 5,000 � - - 5,000
Design - 195,000 55;000 - 250,000
Conshuction 1,175;000
Tofal Expendltures - 200,000 �- -55;000��---- - 1;775,000—"- - 255;000
Forewsted P[bJect C,ost:
Total
21178 2019_ ..2020_ .___ _2021__ _. _ _ 2016202t
Fundln8 Sources�. � � - � � -
UnresMcted Sheet Rei�snue - • - - ..
Grants-�SecuredState� - - - - 40;000
Grents-Unsecurad�Federal - - - - 940,000
TraKc Impact Fees - �- - — 250;000
REET2 - - - - -
Other _ . . ' '
Total Funding Sources = - � - � -. - - � -_ .-.�-. .7.230;000
Capital ExpendiW'es
_ _Pie-flesi9n - ' - - -
Design - - - -� 55,00,0
Construction 7,775,000
Tofel ExpendiWres - - - -� 7,230,000
64
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: West Valley Highway Improvements (SR-18 tol5th Street SW) TIP# 72
Projed No; a5bd20
Project.Type: Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD LOS Co"rridor ID#35
Description:
This project scope inciudes pavemeM rehabilitation and recharmelimtion,pedestrian and bicycle faciliry improvemerrts,
impro�ed roadway lighting,required stortn system improuemeMs, intersection signal replacemerrt at 15th St SW, and
trrtelligerrt Transportation System ImprovemeMs.
Progress Summary:
Survey,b:ase mapping and pre-design are plarmed to be corripleted in 2017 to complete preliriminaryplans antl refine
project cost�stimate.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Ther�is no impact to the street mairrtenance budget.
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sources Pdor to 2015 Estlmate 2078 Butlget 2017 Budget ProJed Tofal
UnresMcted.StreetRevanue - - • - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed;Sta(e,Local) - - • - -
Tra�c Impact Fses - - • 100,000 -
REET2 - • - - -
Other - - -
._.____ _ ._ _.
Tetal Funding Sources - - • 100,000 -
Capital Ez�penditures
. . ..Design - - - 100,000 -
Right o�Way ' ' ' ' '
Construction - - - -
Total ExpenAitares - �-� - 700,000 -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2078 �2079 2020 2027 20764021
Funding Sourcex
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Cocaq 400,000 2,000,000 - - 2,400,000
Tra//ic Impact Fees 100,000 500,000 - - 700,000
REET2 - - - - -
Ot/rer - - ' - -
, Total Funding Sources 500,000 $500,000 - - 3,100,000
Capifal Erzpenditures
Design - - - - 100,000
Right o/Way - - - - -
Constructlon 500,000 2,500,000 - - 3,000,000
Total Expenditure� 500,000 2,500,000 - - 3,100,000
65
City of Auliurn Draft Capitkl Facilities Plan
_- __ — - --_-- — - -- _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap�ta�Faei�it�es P�an
Six Year_Capital_Facilities Plan,2016-2021_-------- --,-- --_--- . . ._. . _ _--_ _ _Special Revenue Fund
_ _ __ -
ProjectTiUe: StewaRRoad(Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor) TIP# 73
ProjectNo: CPXXXX
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Mareger. Cify of Pacific LOS Corridor ID#xx
__ _ _ - --
Description; — - -- _
This is a City of Paoific projegt to widen tlie StewaR Road(Lake Tapps Parkway)Comdor:This is tlie final segmeM of
wideniruj in the City of Pacific which will tie in with the city of Sumner's planrietl final widening segmeM and new bridge over
Uie White river.Completion of this comdor widening is e�ected to significantly relieve traffic congestion in Aubum along
tlie A St SE and C St SE corridors.
------ __ --_._ ._ ._--_.-- — _ -- --
_ _
Progress Summary:
Cityof Pacific has initiatedpreliminary road design and is appying for grarrtfunding to complete tlie Project Cityof Aubum
contribution is for construction phase only.
Futu�e Impact on OperaUng Budget:
There is no fuhrre impad to Aubum's operating budgets.
— - -
Activity:
�2014 YE� �76 Year Erid
FundingSourcex Prior l0 2015 6timate 2016 Budget 2017 Budgot ProJeet Total
Unresficted Sireet Revenile - - - 66,000 -
Gran(s-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Local) - - - - -
�T/aNic Impacf Fees - - - - -
REEM - - - - �- �
Tiafirt�hStigationFees - - - 34,000
Total Funding�Sources - - - 100,000 -
Capifal F�cpenAlh�rex
OBSign - " ' ' '
Righf o(Wey - - - - -
ConstruCtion - - - 100,000
7otal ExpendiL�res - - . 700.000 -
____._- _ _.__._ ._.__. _... __.. _ ._
Forecasted Project.Cost:
Tofal
2018 2019 2020 2021 .201&2021
Funding�Sources
Un2stricted�5heet Revenue - - - - 66,000
Grants-Secured(Fed,State;LocaQ - - - - -
TraHiclmpactFees - - - - -
REET2 - - - - -
Traffic�AMtigationFees - - 34,000
' '
Total Funding Sourcex �- - - -- �--- -. 100,000
Capital Expendilure�
Desi9n - - - - -
RlgAt oi Wey ' ' ' '
Construction - - 700.000.
Tofal EXpenAiturex - - -� • 100,000
66
City of Auliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-- -- - -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capkal FacilRies Plan
Sbc Year CapiWl Faoilkies Plan,2016-2021 Special Re4enua Fund
Project TiUe: Auburn W ay Corridor (4th St NE to 4th St SE) TIP# 3
Project No: �p�ppp�
ProjectType: Non-Capacky
Project Manager: TBD LOS Corridor ID#2, 3
Descriptlon:
TFiis project is based on a pre-design studyto improve pedestrian accessibility,appearance,and.link the downtown area
along Autium Way South b�etween 4th SVeet NE and 4th�Street SE. Ttieproject may include some payement repairs.
However,an overlaywas completed�as part ofthe Citjrs Arterial Ravement Preservation Program in 2007. Although this
was considered a tempo2ry fix the scope hasbeen modified to accourrt for the pavemerrt work.The project is
appropmatey�0.5 miles Iong.
Progiess Summary:
The pavemeM portion.has been minimized due to the work completed�in 2007 under�the Arterial�-PavemeM Preservation
Program.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: - � - �--�-� �
This project will have no impad on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Activity:
2015 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sourcec Prior W TA13 F�imate 2016 Budget 201ZBudget _Project TotAl
Unrestdcted Street RB�enue " - " ' � " - - _
Grents-�Unsecured(Fed;State,Lacel) - - _ _ _
REET - - - - -
T�c/mpact Fees - - - - -
Other Sources
- _ .- __. . _ _. ' '
Total Funding Sourcex - . _ _ . --- .
Capital.BcpendiWrea
Design ' - ' ' '
Right o1 Way ' ' ' ' '
Construction
Total ExpendiWres: � � - - , . .
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Tofai
_ 2078 2019.. 202U 20N 201&2021
Funtling Sourcee: � - � � -� ---� ��
Unrestdcted Street Rewnue - 110,000 600,000 - 710,000
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Locaq - 708;700 2,400.000 - 3,108,700
REET - - _ _ .
TraKc Impac[Fees - - - - _
Other Sources
Total Funding Soureex �--"- - " _ -�818,700 3,000,000 - 3,818,700
Cepital 6cPendiWres
Design - 618.700 - - 618;700
Righto/WaY - 200,000 - - 200,000
ConsWction - - 3,000,000_ 3,000,000
TotalExpendiWrex - 878,700 3,000,000 - 3;876,700-
67
City of Auburn Draft Capital Faci[ities Plan
----- - ----
-
ARTERIAL STREET F'UND (102) Capital Faeilkies Plan
Soc Year Capital Faeilibes Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: M Street SE 8 29th StreeYSE Intersection Safety Improvemerns TIP# 18
Project,No: asbd2l
ProjectType: Non-Capacity,Safety
Projec4 Manager. TBD LOS CorcidorJD#xx
Description:
Thi5 project inpludes the design and construction of a new traffic signal.
_ _ _ --- --
P►og'r"ess Summaryi
M St SE&29tt�StSE is ciurerrtly an all-way stop controlled intersection,e�eriences significaM congestion in ihe peak
traffichours,and has a documented high coliision history.Design is scheduled io be completed in 2016.Construction will
be compieted when pro'ecf is full funded.
- -- — - - — - -
F"utu►e Impaot on Operating`Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$5,000.
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sou�s Prior to 2015 Estimate 2018 Budget 2017 BudgeS Prqect Total
Unrestncted SVeet Rewnue - - �W,000 - 50;000
GraMs-Unsecured(Fed,State,locaq - - - • -
Tiaftipimpaqt Fees - - - - -
REEi2 - - - • -
OtFrer - - - -
Tofal Funding Sources -- i - �_ --- - �50;000" ---.. . . � -�-- - --50;000
Capifal ExpendiWres
� Oeslgn - - 50,000 - 50,000
RigAt W WaY ' ' ' ' '
Conshuetion - - -
..�... ._.. ' _._. . -. . - _ -
TotalF�cpendiWres � - - � -- � �-50;000 - - - -- - -50,000�
Forecasted ProjecfCo'st
Tofal
2018 21179 2f120 2027 20'16202'I
Funding�5ouroes
Un�eshicted�SheetRevewe - 100,000 - - 150,000
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,Sta(e,Local) . - 300,000 - - �300,000
TieNio-lmpaot Fees - - - - -
FtEET2 - - - - -
Other -
Total Fundiog8ources - 400,000� - - 450,000
Capital EzpandiWres
-� Design • - - - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - -
Construction. - 400,000 - - 400,000
Tofal Experidipires: - 400,000 - - 450,000
68
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- -- - - - --
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Snc Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Specfal Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: Auburn Way NorthllsYStreetNE Signal Improvements TIP# 19
� Broject No: asbd05
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#2
Descriptlon:
This project wiii construct a new trafic signal with controller cabinet and battery backup along with necessary intersection
improvemerris.
Progress Summary: -
Design will be completed in 2016.Construction will be completed when fimdirig is secured.
Future impact on Operating Budget:
This projectwill have rm impact on fhe opereting budgetfor street maiMenance.
Activity: - - _
2075YE � 2016YearEnd
Funding Sources PdortoZ015 Fstimate 2016 Budget 2077 Budget BroJeetTotal
UnrestncfedStreetRe�ronue � " _ - �- �� - � 50,000 • 50;000
G2nts-Unsecuied(Fed,State,Local) - - _ _ .
TiaNic/mpact Fees - - - _
Other - - - _
Tofal Funding Sources - � - - -SU,000- - � - 50,000
- Capifal Expenditures
Design - - 50,000 - 50,000
Rlght W Way - - - - -
COl13�NCf100 - - - -
Total FxpenCl�res • - 50,000 • 50,000
Forecasted Project Cost: � -
Tofal
2018 2079 2020 2027 20762UY7
Funding Sources
UnresMcted Street Revenue 200,000 - - - �250,000
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Locaq - - _ _ .
T2f/ic Impact Fees - - _ _ _ .
REET 275,000 - � - - Z75,ppp.
Total FurWing Sources 475,000 - - - 525,000
Capital Ezpendllures
Design - - - - 50,000
RightoFWay �25.000 - - - �,ppp
Constivctlon a50,0U0 - - 450,000
TotalExpendipirex 475,000 - - • 525,000
69
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
____ -- - . . -- - -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Sot Year Capital Facilities PWn;2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: R$Veet SE&21st SVeet SE Intersection Safety hnprovements TIP# 20
ProjectNo: CPXXXX
Project Type: Non-Capaeity,Safety
PrnjectMana9er. TBD LOS Cor�idor ID# zx
D"escrlption:
This pFbject includes tlie design and construction of intersection safety impro�eme�.
ProgressSummary::
_ _ _ _ . _
R St SE&21 stSt SE is cumently a two-way stop controlled intersecUon,experiences.significaM congestion in the peak
traffic h:ours,and has a documeMed high collision history.Arolysis to detertnineappropriate irttersection control ar�d
design is scFieduled to be completed in 2016.Construction will be completed when pro is Tuly fimded.
Future Impaet on Operating 8udgeC.
The annual maiMenancecostfortfiis project is estimated to be$5,000.
-- -
Activity:
� 2015 YE ZOt6 Yea�End
Funding Sourcec�. PAor to�1075 E9imate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProjedTotal
UnresMcted Street Revenue - - 75,000 - 75,000
Grants-Secured(Fed,Stafe,Lxal) - - - - -
Traffic lmpact Fees - - - - -
REET2 - - - - -
Other - - -
Total FueHing Sairbes� - - 75.000 .. .- ....... .-. .-�--�-� --75;000�
Capifal.ExpendiWies
Design - - 75,000 - 75,000
Right o/WaY _ ' ' ' '
ConsWction - -
TotalEzpenditures - . -.. .- .. .75;000� - -- --� _ - -- - �-75.000
-
Forecasted Project Cost:. - - _ -
Total
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162021
Funding Sourees
UnresMcted Street Revenue - 100,000 - - 175,OOU
OreMs-Secured(Fed,State;Locaf) - 700,000 - �-� 700,000
Traflic�lmpact Fees -. - - - -
. . REET2 - - ' _. '
Other ' - - -- - -- .__.� -� -- ' -
TO}ei PYIIAIIIg$OUfCeS - HOO.00O - • S7SrOOO
Capital Ezpenditures
Design - - - ' — 75,000
Right o/Way -. - - - -
� Constmction - 8b0.000 - - 800,000
Total Expendihires - 800,000 • - - � �875.000
7�
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capiw�Faci�n�es e�an
Six Year Gapttal Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue_Fund
Project Title: Main Street Signal Upgrades TIP# 21
Projec4 No: cp1406
Projed Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Luis Barba LOS Cocridor ID#11
Desoripdon: - - -
Reconstriict the ebsting traffic signals at C St NW and W Main St and at E Main St and Aubum Ave/A St SE.The new C St
NW signaJ would provide protected left-tum phasing for C St,and would provide additional safety related to the reilroad pre-
emption.The Aubum Ave/A St signal would replace one of ihe Cit�ls oldest sigrnals which has ezceeded its design life.
Progress Summary:
Design started in 2014 and construction is expected to start in 2015.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This project will have no impact on the opereting budget for street maintenance.
.. _ . ._ _ _ _
AcWihr:
2015 YE 2076 Year En0
FunAing Sourcez Prior M 2015 Fstimate_ _ 2076 Bud et 201Z Budget Pro eef Total
Urnestncted Street Re�enue - - 320,000--�"- - - 320,000
G2nts-Unsecmed(Fetl,State,Loca!) - - . _ _
REET - _ ' ' '
T2KCMrtigationFees 77,232 38,768 100,000 - 150,000
Ofher -
Total FunHing Sources: 71,232 38,768 420,000 - 470,000�
Caplfal EzpendiWres
Design 11.232 38,788 ' ' Sp�ppp
Righto/Way - - ' ' _
Constmction - - _420,000 420,000
Tofal6ipenditures 77,232 38,768 420,000 ' = - -- 470,OD0
Forecasted Projeet Cost: -
7ota1
2078__ _ . _2019 2020 2021 207&2f121
Funding Sources - � " - -�-"�"- �
UnresMctetl Street Re�enue - - - - 320,000
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,Stffie,Local) - _ _ _ "" _
REET - _ _ _ _
TraKc A�ftigation Fees ' ' ' - 100.000
Other
Total Funding Sourees - - -� - - - - 420,000
. CapNsl ExpendlWres:
Design - - . - -
Right o/INay - - _ _ _
Construction ' ' - 420.000
Total F�cpendiWres - - .. _ � - 420,000
71
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
------ - -__- . - _ . _ _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapitalFacilities Plan
Stx Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 _ Special Revenue Fund_
Project Title: Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements TIP# 23
Project No: cpx�oc
ProjectType: Non-Moto�¢ed
ProjectMareger. TBD LOS Corfldor ID#27
Description: _ -- - -- --
Thisproject will construct sidewalks,street IighUng,aM storm improvements on Ri�rwalk Drlv�e SE between Autium Way
S and Hov✓ard Road SE.
. . -- -- -
Progress Summary:
Design is an6cipated to 6egin in 2017.Construction will be completed when funds are available.
Future Impaef on Operating Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for thisproject is estimated to be$10,000.
_-- -- - - -
Aetivity:.
2075 YE P078YearEnd
Funding Sources Prior to 2075 Eslimate 2016 Budget 2017 Bud � t .Pro eet Total.
Unrestncted,Street Rewnue - - - 'I00,000 -
GraMs-Unsetured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
TraNic Impact Fees - - - - -
REET2 ' ' ' ' '
Other - .. . - _ - - -
Total Funding Sources - - - 100,000 -
Capital�ExpendiW res
Design - - - 100,000 -
Righto/INaY ' ' ' ' '
Cons6vction - -
Totel Ettpenditures - - - 100,000 -
-- -- - � - -. .
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tota I
_2078_ ... 2019 2020 2021 2016-2021,
Funiling Sources �
UnresMcted Sheet Re�nue 100,000 - - - 200,000
Grants-Unseeured(Fed,State,Local) 500,000 - - - 500,000
Tre�c Impact Fees - - - • _
REET2 - - - ' -
Other - - -
- .. _ .. - - --=-
Tofal Funding Souroes 600;006 � -.--- --- � • �- -� 700,000
Ca{ilml.Fxpe_nAitureu�.
Desi9n - - - " 100�000
Riglif W WaY - ' . ' .
ConsWction 600,000 - �-� 600.000
Tofnl ExpepdiWres�. 6W�000 - . _. . - _ . - -700;OW
�2
Ciry ofAuburn Drajt Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUNU (102) Capifal Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilifies Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street SE $afety Improvemenfs Study 71P# 27
Project No: cp1110
Proje.ct Type: Safety(Non-Capaeity)
Projed Manager. James Webb LOS Corridor ID#10,33
Descrlption: - — - — _ _ _ _ -
Studythe A Street SE corridor between 6th Street SE and Lakeland HiIIs.WaySE including 41 st St SE Trom D St SE to C
St SE. The study will reView the safety and access needs of the Vaveling p;ublic and tlie adjacent properties.
Progress Summary:
Ir�house pre-design was completed to refine project scope,alignment,and identify design issues.2015 design will
complete conceptual corridor planfor fulure improvemerrts.
Fuhue Impact on Operating Budget:
This study will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintemance.
Ac;ivity:
2015 YE '2016 YearEnd
Funding Sourees Prlor M 2075 Estlmate �2016 Bud et 2077 6ud et Project Total
UnresMcled SMeet Revenue 1;230 20;000 35,000 - �56;230
Grants-Secmed(Fed,State,LocaQ - - - • -
REET - - - - -
Traffic h3tigation Fees - - - - -
Olher ' '
Topl Funding Sourcea 1;230 20;000 35,000 - - � - -".56,230�
Capital ExpendiLiras
Design 1,230 20,000 35,000 - 56230
Right o/Way ' ' ' ' '
C.OIISfNGtlO/1
7om1 ExpendlWrea 1,230 '20,000 35,000 - 56,230
Forecasted Project Cost:
roa�
2018 2019 2020, . . _2021 20162027
_ _
Funding Sources: � " ""..- " . ... ..--
Unrestncted Streef Re�enue - - - - 35,000
Gwnts-.Secured(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
REET - - - - .
T�c Impxf Fees - - - - -
Offrer - -
Total Funding Sources: - - - - " � - " 35,000�
Cap(tal Expendi4�res
Design ' ' ' ' 35.000
Righfo/Way - - - - -
Construction - - - _
Tofal F�cpendiWres - - - �- 35,000
73
City ofAuburn Draft CapitalFacilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Siz Year Capkal FacilNes Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTiUe: CityNride Pedestrian Accessibili4y and Safety Program TIP# 30 '
Project No: asbd08
Project lype: Non-Capacity(Annual)
Project Manager. Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID#N/A
_ . _ _.. _ . . -
Deseriptlon:
This is an annual program to fund pedesfian access and safety impro�,ement projects at loce6ons ttiroughout the.City.
Projects are pnoritized an�ity based on pedestrian.demarids,epsting deficiencies,and citizen requesis.
_ _ - -- - --- - - -- - - - - ---
Progress Summary:
Future Impact'on Operating Budget:
Thisprojed will have no impad on the operating budget for street maiMenance.
Actl4lty:
2075 YE 2016 Year End
Funding$ourees Prlor to 2015 Esfimate 2016 Bud et .2017 Bud et Pro eet Total
UnresMcted Sheet Re�.enue - 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000.
Grents-Secured(Fed,State;Local) - . - - -
REET - - - - -
TiaKc Impact Fees - - - - -
Other ' ' ' ' '
Total Funtling Sourees - . ..100.000 .. -. .-100.000" �100.000 200.OU0
Capifal Expa�MiMes
Design - 15,000 15,OOD 15,000 30,000.
Right of Way ' ' ' ' '
Constmction - 85,000 BS,OOD 85,000 170,000�.
Total F�cpenAiturex • �100;000 �" "---1W,000" --" � � 700,000 � - 200;000�
Foreeasted Project Cost:
roti�
zots 2oie 2020 2osi 2o�e=2oz7
Funding�$ourcea
Unrestncted�StreetRe�noe 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000.
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) • - - - -
REET - - - -
T�cJmpsctFees - - - - -
Other
Total FuiMing�Saircex 100,000 �100,000 700,000 100,000 600,000
Capifal F�cpendlWres
�� Design 75,000 75,000 15,000 15,000 90,000
Right W�WaY - - • ' -
Construction 85,000 &5,000 85,000 85,000 510,000
Total E�cpendlttirex 100,000 100,000 100,000 100;000 600,000
74
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Pldn
_ ._ _ - -- - - - --- _ ._ .
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FacilRies Plan
Six Year 6apkal Facillties Plan,2016-2021 Special ReJenue�Fund
ProjectTiUe: Citywide Arterial Bicycle&Safety Improvements TIP# 31
Project No: asbd07
ProjectType: Non-Capacity(SaFety)
Project Manager. Various LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Description:
This is a biannual program to fund bicycle and safety improvemeMs on classified roadways. Projects are prioritized
annually based upon field studies.Projectwas previously called"Citywide Roadway Safery Infrastructure ImprovemeMs".
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Thisprojed will have no impac[on the operating budget for street mairrtenance.
Activity: - --- - --
� 2015 YE� 2016 Year Eiid
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 Estima4e 2016 Budget 2017 Budget �Projeet Total
UnrestnctedStreetRevanue - - 100,000� - �700,000
Granfs-Secured(Fed,S[ate,Loca/) - - - - -
REET - - - - -
T�c/mpact Fees - - - - -
Other - -
' Tofal FunAing Sources � " - "--� - - -" " 700;000 - - � - 700,000�
Capital Fxpenditures
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000�,
Riglit MWay ' ' - '
Cqnslmction - - 90,000 - .90,000�
Total ExpendiWres - . 100,000 - 100,000
. _ . ___... . . _... . _ _ . .. .. _ _.
Forecasted Project Cost: -
Total
2018 2019 2f120 2027 20762021�. ..
Funding Sourcex -
Unrestdcted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000�
Grants-.Securetl(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Tra�clmpact�Fees - - - - -
Other -
Tofal Funding Sources 100,000 - 100,000 - " � -300,000�
Capital Expentlitures
Design 10,000 - 10,000 - 30,000
Right of Way ' ' ' ' '
Conshuction 90,000 90,000 270,000
TotalE�cpenditures: � �-- "700,000 � -- - 100,000 - 300;000
�5
City of Aub"ur"n Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-----. .... --- ---___. .- - - - _ — - - --- -- -- ----_=-.
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapitalFacilities Plan
Six Year CapitaLFacilwes Plan;2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Downtown Transk Center Access Jmprovements TIP#44
Rrojeet No: cpxx�oc
ProjectType:: Non-Capacitjr,Transk
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#xx
De§cription: . .- -- --
This projectwill modifychannelization and curb radii to improve tuming radii for transit vEhicles at the.souThwest camer of S
DivisionSt&3rd St SW,and ttre southeast comer of A Sf SU/&2nd St SW.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operafing Budget:.
The annual mainterrance costtor this project is estimated to mirrimal.
. _ __- ---- -- - _ _ _
- -- - — - - -- - - -
Activity:
2015 YE 2076 Year End
FuoAingSource�� Priorto2015.. Estimate. 2016Butlget__.:2017�Budget _ _ProJee6Tofal.
UnrestNctedStraetRevenue .. .-----� -_--�- --- ---=�- --�----
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facnities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilitfes Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue_Fund
Project Title: 104th Aye SE & Greeq Riyer Road Study TIP# 46
Project No: cp1021
ProjectType: Non-Capacky(Interseetion Safety)
ProjectManager. James Webb LOS Corridor ID#24
__ _ _
Descriptfon:
7his project funds a pre-design study to determine Uie rigMof-way,errvironmerdal and coristruction requiremerrts for
intersection safety improvements.The project is anlicipated to incl�de sight-distahce impm�merrts,coristructing tum-
lanes,channelimtion,ernrironmeMal mitiga6on,signage and clear mne impro�men4s.
Progress Summary:
Futureimpact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budgetfor sVeet maintenance.
_ — -
Activky:
2075 VE 2016 YeBrEnd
Funding.5our�a Pdor to 2015 FsGmate 2076 Budget 2017 Budget Pro eetTotal
UnrestrictedStreetRevenue 3,228 - 5,000 - 8,228
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
REET - - - ' - _
PWTFL - - - - _
Other - - -
Tofal Funding Sources �3,228 � - 5,000 - 8,228
Capital ExpendiWrea
Design 3,228 - 5,000 - 8,228
Right of Way ' ' ' - '
Construcfion
Total Fxpenditurea 3,228 - 5,000 - �- - 8;228
Forecasted ProJect Cost
7otal
20'18 3U19 2020 2021 20162027
Funding Sources:
Unrestncted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000
Grants-Securetl(Fetl,State,Locel) - - - - -
REET - , _ _ _
PWTFL - - - - -
Other . - - - -
Tofal Funding Swircea - - - - 5,000
Ca p ita I.Ex pe n diture s
Desgn ' - - - 5,000
Right W WaY - ' - ' -
COIISfNG�i0/1
Total Expenditures ' ' ' ' 3,000
��
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faeilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan;2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
_ _
Project TiUe: A St Sf &6th St SE Safety and Access trnprovements TIP# 48
Project No:. asbd09
Proje.ct Type: Non-Capacky
Project Manager. James Webb LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Descriptb:n:
This project isa parinership kietween Aubum and Budington Northem Santa Fe Railway to imptove the intersection of A St
SE and 6th St SE.The scope of the project iricludes adding a ptia:se to the traffic sig"nal for traffic enteririg arxi ebtirx,�the
BNSF rail yarii.
Progress Summary:
Design and construclion is plarvied to be completed in 2016 pending agreemeM with BNSF.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project.will haVe no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Aetivity:
zo�s re so�e rear�a '
FundingSourced PAorto2015 Estimate . 2078Bu et. 2017.Budget ProJectTotal
Unrestricted St2et Rewnue - - - �"��- = " " � � -- - - -
Grants-Secuied(Fed;State,LocaQ - - - - -
Tra�c Impact Fees - - - - -
PWTFL .- ' ' ' .
Othei(BNSF) - - W;000 - . 50,000
Total-Funding Sources - _ -_ . -=. "50.000. __ . _ ..___" _ __. - ...50�000
Capital.Fspenditures
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000
Rlght o7WaY - ' - - -
ConsUuction 40.000 � 40.000
rorar.���dia,rex - - - —so;000 -- — - _ so,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2016 2079 7A20 2021 201&2021
Funding Sourcea
UnresMcted Straet Re�snue - - - - -
Grants-Securad,(Fed,,State;LoceQ - - - -� -
T�c Impact Fees - - - - -
PWTFL - - ' - '
Other(BNSF) - - - 50,000
Total�FunEing Sources - - - - 50,000
CaPltal.Expenditurex�.
Desi9n - - - - 10.000
Wgfrt�WaY - - - - -
CunsWction 40,000
Totel6cpanditurea - • • • 50,000
�g
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capita�Faci�kies e�an
Six Year CaPkal FaeiliUes Pian,2016-2021 Speclal Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: ffS Dynamic Message Signs TIP# 50
Project No: asbdl6
ProjectType: Non-Capacity(ffS)
Project Manager. TBD LOS Cor�idor ID#N/A
DescrlpUon:
This project funds ihe design and construction ofDynamic Message Signs atvarious locations throughout the City.
Dynamic message signs are an importaM IMelligeM Transportation System(IT5)tool for proyiding infortnation to roadway
users.Priority locations for sign,placemeM are based on tlie Coriiprehensive Tr-ansportation Plaris fTS�map and include
Aubiun Way N,Aub�um Way S,W Valley Highway,E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Road.
Progress Summary:
The first phase of this project is scheduled to begin in 2016 or sooner if grantiunding becomes available.
Futureimpact on Opereting Budget:
The annual maintenance cost fw this project is estimated to be$5,000.
Activ'rty:
2D75 YE� 2076 Year End
Funding Soureex PAw to 2075 Esfimate 2078 Budget 2077 Butlget Projaet Tofal
Unrestncfed Street Revanue - - - - -
Grants-Unsecuretl Federal - - �- 120,000 -
� REET - - 100,000 30,000 100,000
PWTFL _ ' ' ' '
Other(wR4) 50,000 .50,000.
Total Funding Sourcex - = 750,000 iW,000" - -�750,000�
Capital FxpentliLires
Design - - 20,000 20,000 20,000
Right of Way - - - - -
Cansfruction - 130,000 130,000 i30,000�.
7ota1 ExpandiWres . - - 750,000 750,000 150,000
Foreeasted Prgect Cos;d
rotal
2018 2019 2020 2021, 2078-2021.
Funding Sourcas �
Unrestricted Sbeet Revenue - - - - -
Grents-UnsecuredFederal 120,000 120,000 - - 360,000
REET 30,000 . 30,000 - - 190,000
PWTFL ' - ' ' '
Other(WRA) - . 50,000.
Tofal Funtling Sourees 150,000 150,000 - - 800,000�
Capital FxpenCih�res
� Design 20,000 20,000 - - 80,000
Right W Way - - - - -
Cmstruction 130,000 130,000 - 520,000
� Tofal Expenditures: 150,000 750,000 - - 800,000�
79
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
__ _ _ ___ _ _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapMal Facilities Plan
Siz Year Capital FadlltiesPlan,2016-2021 Special Re4enue Fund
ProjectTitle: AWS Streetscape Improvemen4s (SR=18 4o M St SE) TIP# 62
Project No: cpx�ooc
ProjectType: N�scellaneous
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#3
__. _ _ _
Description:
This project will revitalize and beaubTyAWS from the SR-18 iMerchange to the iMersection with MStr�eet SE. Proposed
improvements include:enhancementaf crosswalks and pedestrian linkages;new and repaired sidewalks;curb and gutter,
pedestrian ramps;:new laridscaped medians;street trees,new lighting;pedestrian benches;trash receptacles recycling
coMaineis and oiher appropriate amerrities.A sigrrificarit portion of project costs are associated with rigMof-way
acquisition.
_....__ . - - � -—� - - - � ----- - - -
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operatlng Budget:
This annuat mairitenance costfor-this project is estimated to be$10,000.
--- - -- -
ACtlVlfy: _. . _ . . _ _ ' . _
2D75 VE 2016 Year End
Funtlinp Sources PAor fo 2015� E9tmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget Projecf Total
Unrestncted Sfiaet Re�anue - - - . -
Grants-Unsecureii(Fed,Stare,Local) - - - - -
TreK/cJmpeot Fees - - - - -
REET2 ' ' ' ' '
O[her
Total Funtling Sources - - -� • -�
Capi�l.E:pendf Wres
Design ' ' ' ' '
Rlght of Wey - - - -. -
ConsVuction - - - - -
. _ ________ . __ __._ .. ._— _______.
Tofal ExpentliWres ' " ' ' '
._. ... _ _...._ .._..
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 '2021 'ZfN6-2021
Funding Sources
UnresWcted S6aet Revenue - 200,000 �200,000 - 400,000
Gran[s-Unsecured(Fed,Stete,Locap - 1,750,000 2,600,000 - d;350,000
TraKc Impact Fees - - - - -
REET2 - - - - -
Other - - -
Total Funding�Sourcas �-� 7,950,000 2,800,000 • 4,730,000
.. ..... .. . . . ..
Capital Eapentlidues
� Design - 500,000 - - 500,000
Rlght W Wey • 1.450.000 �' ' 1.450,000
Consbuction - - �2,800,000 2,800,000.
TotalF�cpentlituie�s: - 1,950,000 �2,800,000 - 4,750,000��
$Q �
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilitles Plan
Six Year Capital Facilides Plan,2016-2021 Special Revenue Fund
Project TiUe: Traffic Signals Safety Improvements TIP/f 67
Project No: cp1501 STIP#AUB-45
Project Type: Non-Capaeity
Project Manager. Jcel Ctialmers LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Description:
trnprove traffic signal phasing and timing,and improve ysibility of traffic signal heads.
Progress Summary:
Federal Grant was awarded in 2014.Design pFmse began in 2015 and construction is scheduled for completion in 2016.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
There is rio impact to the street mairitenance budget.
Activity:
2015 YE. 2018Year End
Funding Sources Prlorto 2015 Estimate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProJeotTotal
UnresMctedStreetRevenue - " "- - ��5;000 " � � - - 5;000
Grants-SecuredFederal - - 412,575 - 412;575
Tra(fic Impact Fees - - - _ �� _
REET2 - 27.600 - - 27.600
Other ' ' ' '
Total Funding Sources - 32,600 412,575 - 445;175
Capifal Expenditures
Design - 32,600 - - 32,6W.
Right of Way - • - - -�
Conshuction - � - 412,575 - 412,575
TotalExPentliWres - 32.600 472.575 . -445,775
Forecasted Pro)eat Cost:
Tofal
2016 2019 2020 2021 2016-2027
Funding Sources
UnresMcted Sheet Rewnue ' ' ' ' '
. . .. ... _ . .. _. _
GraMs-Secured Federal - - - - 412,575
Tral/iC Impect Fees - - - - -
REET2 - - _ _ _
Other • - . -
. __ .. _. ._ .. __ . -
TotalFundingSources - - - - � � -�472,575
Capiml Expenditures
. . Design ' ' ' ' '
Right of Way �- - _ _ _
ConsVuction -� - - 412,575.
Total6cPendiWres -. .. - - 412.575
gi
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERL4L�STREET FUND (102) Capital Fagiu_ties Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities,Plan,2016-2021. _ ___ _ _ . __ _ _ Specia_I_Reyenue_Fund
Project Title: A Street SE 8�37th Street SE Intersection lmprovements TIP# 68
Project No: cp1502
ProjectType: Inferseetion Improvernent, Non-capacity
Project Manager: Luis Barba LO.S Corridor ID#70
DescriptPon:
Widen the intersection for a U-tum,install an iMerconnected trafficsignal,overlaythe irrtersection,and upgrede curb ramps.
P►ogress Surtirriary; . - _
Federai Grant was awarded in 2014.Arterial Preservation Fund 105 will participate in this project to overlay por6ons of A
SfSE. Budget for 2016 includes 10%Iocal match;there is a poteritial of receiving 100%grant funding for ttre construction
phase if project is advertised by September 30,201 Z.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
The annuai mairrtenance cost for ttris project is estimated to be$2,500.
___ - - - _ -
Activity:
2015 YE 2078 Yea�End
FundingSourees Pdorto�2075 Eslimate 20�6�Budget 2017Budget ProjeetTofal
UnresMctedStreetRewnue �- 55,000 - - 55,000
OraMs-Unsecured Federal - 156.900 635,360 - 792,260
T2N�Impact Fees ' ' ' ' '
Other(Artenal Preseiq.�Fund f05) 87.240 - 87,2M
Total Funtling$ources - 217;900 7Y2.600.- - .- ._ . . .-934,SOD�
Capital FxpandlLrtes
� Desiyn - 145,500 - - 145,500
Righf o/�Way • 66,400 - - 66;400
Conshuction - 722,600 - 722,600
Total Ezpendilu.rerea �- 271,900 722,600 - 934,:500
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2078 2019 2020 2027 201&2027
Funding�Sourcex
UnresMcted Sheet Revenue - - - - -
Giants-Unseoured Federal - - - - 635,360�,
T�c Impact Fees - - - - -
OUrer(Aderial Preser4. Fund f 05) - - 87240�
Tofal Funding Sourcex - • - - 722,600
Capifal FxpendiNres
Desi9n ' . ' ' '
RIgFi(o/Way - - - - -
Construction - 722,600
�Ttital ExpendiLires ' ' ' ' . 7T2,600
Grdnts/Other Souroes: OtFrer Funds�are Fund 105 Artenal Presenation Funds
82
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2A
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL STREET
2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 �2021 Total
�CapaciN Proieets:
None .
NoifCanaekv Proiects: �
1 Local Street Improvame�rt Program
Capihal CosCs 1,600,000 t,600,D00 1,600,OD0 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 9,600,000
Funding Souroes: .
Fund Balance - - _ _ .
Transfer In(W/S/SWMUtility) 150,000 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 800.000
SalesTaxonConstruction 1,450,000 1�,450,000 7,0.50,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 8,700,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - � � . �
UtilityM6gation - • - _ _ _ .
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
CapaciryProjecls - - - _ _ _ .
Non-CapabiryProjeds 1,600,000 1,600,0�0 1,600,000 1,600,Ob0 1,600,000 1,600,000 9,600,000
Total Costs 1-,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 7,600,000 8,600,000
�RINDING SOURCES:
. _ .__.....
Fund Balance - - - - . _ _
T2nsferin(W/SSWMUtiIity) 150,000 750,000 150,000 750,000 150,000 150,000 900,000
Sales7axonConsWction 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 7,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 8,700,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - _ _ _
UUIiryMtlgation - - - . _
Tofal Funding 1,600,000 7,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 9,600,000
83
City of Auburn Draft Capitgl Facilities Plan
LOCAL STREET FUND (103) Capital Facllkfes Plan
Six YearCapifal Facilkies:Plan,2016-2027 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: Local Street Improvement Program TIP#37
Project No: Various
Project Type: Non-Capaeltjr, Preservation
Project Manager. Jai CaYter LOS CorrWor ID#WA
Description: - - -
The program preseryes local(unolassified)sUeets. The work includes crack sealing,asphalt patching,pre-le�eling,asphalt
oye�lays arid roadway reconstruction. Beginning in 2013 fimding sources include annual salestax on construction.
Prog[ess Summa_ry: _ - -- -- - --
This program has successfulycompieteii overlays,chip seals and complete recortistructions since 2005. The program will
foous ori reconstruction in 2015 and 2016.
Future ImpSc't on Operatlng Budget:
There is no impact to the street maiMenance budget
-- - - - -
ActNity:
(Previous 2Vre.) 2075 VE E016 Year End
Fundin0 Soureac �Pdor to 2015_ .Eetlmate. �2016 Budget 2017 Budgat Pro eetTotel
Locel Straef Fund -589.374 1,368,665 - �- 1�.958.039
Translerin 300,000 1W,000 150.000 150,000 600,000
PmPertY Tex _ ' - . .' ' '
SalesTaxmConstructlon 2,648,495 1,700,000 1,450;000 1,45D,000 5;798,495
Bontl Proceeds - �- ' ' '
Other
Tofal Funding Soufees 3,537�.869 3,276.665 1.600.000 .. . 1.600.000� � � 6:35B.534
Wplml ExpenEiWros
Deaipn 425.000 400,000 �900,000 300,000 1.125,000
R/ght W WeY _ ' _ '
ConsVuction 3.N2,869 2.618.665 1.300.000 1.300.000 8,531,534
Total EzpenCitures 3.537.BW 3.218.665 1,600.000 7.600.000 8.356.534
Forecasted ProJect Co`st;
Total
20t8 2019 2(1211 2021 201621121
FunCingSources �- ��- - ---. .._. _
Lxel Slreet Fund � - - - - -
�Trans/erin 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000
PmpertyTex - - - -
SelesTazonConstruc!lon 1,450.000 1.d50,000 1,450,000 1.450,000 8.700,000
Bond Proceeds ' - ' ' '
Other
TWalFundingSoureea: '1,600,000 1,600,000� �7;fi00,000���"-1,600,000"---�-- 8;600,000
Capitel FzpenEitures
Deslgn 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000
Wght o/Wey - - - - -
Constmction . 1,300,OW. . ];300,000 �1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000
Tofel�ExpenCiWiex 1.600,000 1.600,000 1.600,000 1.600.000 9.600.000
84
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2B
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION - STREET PRESERVATION
2018 2017 2018 2078 2020 2021 Totel
,:apacitv Prolecffi:
None '
Non�CaoaciN Probc7s:
1 151h Street SW Reeonstruction
Capital Cosis - - 300,000 2,000,000 - - 2,300,000
fund Balance - - - - - - -
UtlliryTax - - 300,000 2.000,000 - - 2,300,000
Granls ' ' ' ' - ' '
_Bond Proceeds -
2 Lake Tapps Parkwey PreservaHon
Capital CosS 124,380 828,470 - - - - 952,650
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - - - - - - •
Grants 97,900 652,100 - - - - 750,000
UtiliryTax 26,480 176:370 - - 202,850
3 AonualArteNalStreetPreservatlonProgrem
CapitalCosts 600.000 700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 8,500,000
Funding�Sources: �
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
UfiIllyTaz 600,000 700,000 1,800.000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 8,500,000
.Bond Proceeds. - -
- __ _
Onnual Ar[erlal Gack Seal Pro9ram
Capilal Cosls 100,000 100,000 700,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - • - - - .
UHIIry7ax 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 __800,000
5 Auhum W ay N Preservatlon(22rW Street NE w 45M Street NE)
Capital Cds6 1,775,000 - - - - - 1,775,000
Funding Sources: -�
Fund Balance - - - - - -
Ulility7ax 887,500 - - - - - 887,500
. Grants__ _ _ . .. .887,500 . . ' ' ' . - �- 687.500
6 15th Street NEMW Pmservation(SR-0 67 to Bth Streat N�
Capital CosLs 735,000 1,500,000 - - - - 1,635,000
Funding Sources:
FunG Balance - - - - - - -
UbliryTax 67,500 750.000 - - - - 877,500
Granls 67,500 750,000 877.500
Note:Flnanclel plen u6lizes Me/ollowlne order hr use ollunds fo Bnance prqects:grant revenues(ilevallable),uh7ity tax revenues and/und 6alancB.
SUMMARY:
CAPRALCOSTS
CapaciryProjecis - - - - - - -
Non-CapacityPro)ecls . 2,734;380 3J20,470 2200,000 .3,900�,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 15,762,850
Total CosS 2,734,380 3,728;470� 2,200,000- -3�,900,000� 1�,900,000-" "1,900,000 � - 15,782,850�
FUNDINGSOURCES:
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
UtlliryTau 1,681.480 1,728,370 2,200,000 3,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 13,307,850
Grants 1,052.900 1,402.100 - - - - 2,455,000
Bontl Proceads -
� Total Funding 2,734;380 3,128A�0 2,200,000 3,900,000 7,900,000 1,900,000 15,762,850
g5
Ciry ofAuburn Drkft Capital Facilities Plan
- _ - - - - -
- ---- — ----- ----- - --- - _
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Caprtai.Fac��n�es P�an
Siic YearCapital Faaiikies Plan,2016-2021 Speeial Revenue Fund -
ProjecfTitle: 15fh Street SW Reeonstruction TIP# 7
ProjectNa� cp�aooc
Project Type: Preservatbn
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#12
Description: _ - - - _ _ - - - - - -
This project will evaluate improvemerrts to,the Union Pacific atyrade railcrdssirgs as well as the vartioal sight distance to
the Urterurban Trail crossing to the west of the tracks.This project could include pavemeM preservationand may be
aacomplished through lhe Pavemerrt Preservation Program. A cost estimate for planning purposes is provided below.
Progress Summary:
Futu�e Impaat onAperatingBudget:
This projeot will Fiaye iio impact on the operatlng b_�dget for street mairrtenance,
Activity:
2015 YE 201B YeanEntl
. . . ... _ . .:. _ .__ .__.
Funding Sourcos Prior to 2015 Estlmete 2076 Butlget 2017 Budget P eetTotal
ArTenel�Preservation Funtl Belance - - - - -
Grants-Lnsecured(Fed,Stete;tocap - - - - -
Utiliry Tax ' ' - - -
T�c Mitigation FurMs - - - - -
Boird Pioceeds� �
Tofal Funding Sourees - - �- - -
Capit5l Ezpenditurea
Design - - - - -
RigAt o/Wey - - - - -
Conshuctlon
TotalFxpBnNlures _ . _ . - __- _.. __ ._. .___. . . . __ ._
Poreeasted Project Cosr
Totel
2018 2019 2020 2021 _ . .20162021
Funding Soureee _ . . _ - _ __._ __. . _ _ .__ _ _ _. _ _
Aitenal Preseivation FuM Balance - - - - -
GrantsLnsecured(Fed;State,Locaq - - - - -
UNliryTar 300,000 2,000,000 - - 2,300,000
Treffic Mltigation FurWs - - - - -
Bond�Piodeeds -. . _ - - - -
__ _._ . . _ _—.___ . —_._ _ ___ . .—.
Tofal FurMing Soureas 300,000 2;000,000 - - 2,300,000
Capital EfipenAiture�
Design 300,000 - -� - 300.000
Righf of Way - - - - -
ConsWction 2.000,000 2,000,000,
Tbtsl Eoipendituresi 300,000 2,000,000 - - �2,300,000�,
g6
City ofAuburn Draft Capital F'acilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital FacilRies Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,2016-2021 SpecfalRevenue Funds
Project TiUe: Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation TIP#22
Project No: spbd02 STIP#AUB-51
ProjectType: Non-Capacity, Preservation
Project Manager. Jai Carter
Description: The Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation project will complete a patch and overiay of pavemeM behveen the
AuburNSumner City limit and Lakeland Hills Way including all reguired ADA improvements to curb ramps,sidewalks,and
pedesVian signals.
Progress Summary:
Federal Grantwas secured in2014.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
There is rio impact to tfie street maintenance birdget.
Actiyity:
2075 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sourcex. PAor to 2015 Fstfmate 2016Budget 2017 Budget ProjectSotal
Aitenal Preservation Fund Bala�e - - - - -
Grants-SecuredFederal - - 97,900 652,100 9Z,900
UtilityTaz - - 26,480 176,370 �26,480
REET2 - - - - -
BondProceeds - - - -� �-
Tofal Punding Sources • • �124,380 828,470 124,380
Capital Expendihires
Design - - - - -
Righto/WaY - - 124,380 - 124,380
Conshuction - • - 828,470 -
Total Expendi;ures - - 724,380 828,470 724,380�
Fore6asted Project Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 2027 201fi-2021
Funding Sources
Artenal Preservation Fund Balance - - - - -
Grants•Secured Federal - - - - 750,OOD
Utility Tax - - - - 202,850
REET2 • ' ' ' -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Tofal,Funding Sources - - - �- 952,850
Capital Ezpenditures
Desl9� - - - - -
Right.ol4Yay - - - - 124,380
ConsWction - �- - - 828,470
Total Expenilih�Fex - - - - 952.650
g�
C.ity ofAuburn Draft Capita!Facilities Plan
__ -- - --- -.
---- —
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,201§-2021 Special Re4enue,Funds
Project Ttle: Annual Arte�ial Street Preservation Program TIp#35
Project No: Varies
ProjectType: Non-CapacRy, Preservation
Project Marrager: Jaf Carter LOS Corridor ID#NIA
Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various Gassified streets citywide. These
projects may incluqe a combination of overlays, retiuilds,antl spot repairs. This program'is funded ttitough a 1%ifility tiz
ttiat was ailopted b'y City Council during 2008.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully complete ann0al patching and overlay projects citywide.
Future lmpacf on Operadng Budget:
There is no impact to the street maiMenance budget.
Activity:
- (PreHous 2 Years) 2015 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sources PNo[to2015 _Fstlmate_ 2016 Budget �2017 Budget Pro edTotal
ArtenalP2senrationFund � -�80;750��-��-2;875;293 - - 2,956,043
PropeRy Tar - ' - - -
UtllltyTax 1;192;164 1,700;000 600,000 700,000 �3,492,164
REET2 - - - � .
otr�e.pcoM - iso,000 - - iso,000
Tofal�Funding Sources 1,272,914 4;765,293 600,000 700,000 6,638,207
Capital Cticpendihires
Design 39,167 100,000 50,000 50,000 :299,187
Righl o/Way - - - - -
Constn�ction 7;233,747 4,665,293 550,000 650,000 7�,099,040
Total ExpendiWres 7,272,914 4,765,293 600,000. 700,000 6,638,207
_ __-
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2078 2019 20Y0 2f)27 �Y016-PU21
Funding Sources
Arterial Resenallon Fund - - - - -
PropertyTaz - ' - ' '
UtilityTaz 1,800,000 1,800,000 7,800,000 1,800,000 B;500,000
REET2 - - - • -
Other(ICON) - - -
T�I Funding Sources 1,800,000 7,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 B,500,000
Capipl ExpendiWres
Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50;000 300,000
RigM of WaY - - - - -
Construction 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 8,200,000
Total EipendiWres 7,800,000 7,800,000 7,800,000 1.800,000 8.500,000
g8
Ciry of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_____
-- -
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capifal Facilities Plan
Siii Year Capital Fayilities Plan,201E2021 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program TIP#36
Project No: spbd03
ProjectType: Non-Capacity, Preservation
Project Maregec Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID#N/A
Description:
hnpiement regular maiMenance of various classified streets by sealing newly fortned cracks. Sealing the cracks will
prolorg the life of the pavement by stopping waterfrom draining into tlie sub-base of fhe road.
ProgressSummary:
Program continues to successfully extend pavemeM life pavemeM citywide.
Future Impact on Operoting Budget:
There is no impact to the street maintenance budget
Activity:
2075 YE� 2018 Year End
Punding Sources Prior to 2015 Estimate 2016 Budget __ 2017.Budget. .. .ProJect Total .
. Artenal Preservafion Fund �� - � �-- �� - - �� - � - -
UtiliryTax - - 100,000 100,000 100,000
REET - - - - -
I Bond proceeds - - - - -
Total Funding Sources - - 100,000 100,000 100,000
Capital Fxpenditures
Design - - 10,000 10,000 10,000
Right oPWay - - - - -
Con51NCflOn - - 90.000 90,000 90,000
Tatal Fxpenditures - - 100,000 700,000 100,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofa�
2018 2079 21120 2021 20162027
� Punding Sources
ARanal Presenation Fund - - - - -
Ufility Tar 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000-
REET - - - - -
Bondproceeds - - - - -
Total Funding Sourees 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Capiql Fxpenditures
Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 66,OU0
Right of Way - �-� - - -
Construction 90,000 90,000 .90,000 90,000 540,000
TotalEzpenditure� 100,000 �100,000� 700;000 700,000 600,000
89.
City ofAuliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ -=- -=- --
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capkal Facllitles Plan
Siz'Year Capftal Faeilities Plan,2018-2027 __ _ _ Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTi4le: Aiiburn Way N Preservation(22nd Street NE to 45th Street NE) TIP# 70
PFoject No: cp7507
ProjectType> Non-Capae'ity, Preservation
Project Mareger. Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID#27
Descriptio`n:
7}ie project proposes to grind and oveday Aubum Way N from the 22nd Street NE to 45th Stree4 NE, The project wiil
restore 7:31arie miles of payement,upgrade 26 curb ramps to meet aurerrt ADA starxiard,as we as remove unused
driveway openings as an upgrade to non ADA compliaM pedesfian faciiities..The project fwids the design,coordirration,
permimng,and cbrutruction of the pavemeiit preservation project.
_ - --
Progress Summary:
Federal,grent was secured in 2015.
Future lmpacfon Operating Budget:
There is no impact to the street mai�rtenance budget.
_ - - _ . . .
Acfivity:
2015 YE .2018 Year End
FuntlingSources:� Pdorto2015 E4lmate 20766udget___201ZBuAget ProectTotal
ArtenalPreseriatfonFtintl - 80,000 - - � -- --� - � �- ---���80;000�
Grants-SecuredFederel - 80,000 887,500 - g67,500
UtilityTax - - 887;500 - 887,500
Bond prooeeds - - � - � - �
Total Funtling Soureom. - 160,000 7,775,000 - 1,g38,000
Capifal�Expenditures
Design - 160.000 - - 160.000
Right o/Way - - - _ _ �
Constiuction - 1,775,000 1,775,000
Total Ezpendiwras - 160,000 1.775.000 - 1,935,000
Forecasted Project Cost: - -�
Total
. 2018 2079 21120 2027 207�2U21
Funding Sources —
Arterlal Preservation Fund - - _ _ .
Grants•�SecuredFederal - - - - gg7�,5pp
Ut111tyTar - - ' - 887;500
Bond proceeds - - _ � �
Tofal�Funding Soureex � - - - - 7,775,000
Capital Ezpendllures
Desfgn - - - -. -
Right o(Way ' ' - _ '
Conshuction ' - ' _ __ . ._ _ 1,Z75,000
7otal E[penilitures: - -� - - 1,775,000
90
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capita�Facilities Plan
Si�c Year Capifal Facilities Plan,2016-2027 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: 15th Street NE/NW Preser4ation(SR-167 fo 8th Street,NE) TIP# 71
Project No: spbd05
ProjectType: Non-Capacity, Preservation
Project Manage�: Jai Carter LOS Corridw ID#9
Description:
Theproject proposes to grind and overlay 151h SVeetNW%NE from the SR167 ro Aubum 1Ney N;and grind and overlay
Hanrey Road NE from Aub�an Way N to 8Th Street NE. The project will restore 7.57 lane miles of pavemerrt, upgrade 30
curb ramps to meet c�ment ADA standard,as well as remove unused driveway openings as an upgrade to non ADA
compliaM pedestrian facilities. The projecttunds the design,coordina5on,permitGng,and constructlon of ttie pavemeM
preservation project.
. . . .. .. . . .. .__
Progress Summary: .
Federal grant was secured in 2014.
Future Impacton Operating Budget:
There is no impact to fhe sVeet maintenance budget.
Activiry:
201 S YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sources PAor m 2015 Esfima4e 2016 Budget 2017 Budget Projeet 7o4a1
ARenel Preservation Funtl - - - - -
Grants-SecuredFederal - - 67,500 750,000 67,500
UfilityTax - - 67,500 750,000 67,500
Bondproceeds ' - ' '
Tofal Funding Sources - - 735,000 7,500,000 135,000
Caplfal Ezpentlit�res
Design - - 135,000 - 135,000
Right of Way - - - - -
Conshuction 7,SOQ000
TOUI FspendiWres - �- 135,000 1,500,000 735,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
roal
2078 2079 �2020 __ 202t__ ___20162021
Funding Sources: �- � - - —-
Artenal Preservdtion Fund - - - - _
Grants-Secmed Federal - - - - 817,500
UtilityTax ' ' ' ' 817,500
Bond proceeds - -
Total Funding Sources� - - - - 1,635,000
Capifal Expenditurex
Design ' _ _ ' 135.000
Right o/Way - - - - -
Constryction - - 1,500,000
Total Fxpentliturea ' ' " ' 1,835,000
91
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T3
SUMMARY OF IMPACT'S ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Pro eoe 2ot7 2ota zo�a zo2o zoz� 2ozz 7omt
t aStrestNW.Phasf $ 2g,g30 $ 25.830 $ 25;830� $ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ 25,830 B �54,980�
p A WS Padmfrhn hnp.-Dopweotl ro Ffr _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3 M�StredtUnErpas. . . .� .. 2t.827 21.827 21.827 2{,827 27'.827 21,827 130.982�
4 52TR�SfCoirfeoiCapaclty 2�250 2�.250 2],250 27.250 2�.250 2]250 t63.5O0
5 AWSMp{Npnlock.toAutlOinyDi.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _
g FSvaaSEDownrownmLasGors - 4,100 4,700 4,100 4,700 4,100 20,500
7 M3YiwfNE,EMilnlolt� - . - - 'I,500 1,500 3,000
g M'StSE613M'SYSETraMeSlgnal � _ - 8,600 6,600 6,600 19,800�
8 BN St/oet NE W/tlanfnp - - - 600 600 600 1.600
10 Merny6M�SVeafNE _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'H AteO�myDNvaMUItFUSTraf/ _ _ _ - 25,000 25.000 50.000
12 �6fh Pl�q S R�a/Ipnmom " ' " ' " 1.750 1.�50 3.500
�s csrswa�aenstswNe.a�v� - - - z.soo s.soo z.soo �,soo
14 121eb Aro SECOMtlor 6]YOM Nnp. - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 'l,500��
t5 1ItMAwSEGorrltlorlmp.-P�aa2 . _ _ - 3,500 3,500 7.000�
i6 RSt�fBypaa _ _ _ _ _ _ _
17 SE 310N SY Corr/tlor ImP. ' - ' " - - '
18 AWSCoirltlorSahtylmprov�menb " " " " " - "
19 13C�A�e�6 5E 3!!f�St lnf:/mp" " " ' " ' _ '
20 TralfleManagpna�rtCantwlmp. - ' " " . ' -
2� w v.��er M+r.�+v:+ern se Nw ro w
Maln Sf. - - - - - - -
� LakaieppsPkwy/'(9E�analon - 5,000 5.000 3,000 5,000 5,000 25,000
23 AStSE6LakManCHI//aWaySE - - _ _ _ _ _
24 AW5613fhStSEMermcNenbnP. " " " " " " "
.... . _ _ .. . . . .....
25 K�lYWaYStvUY ' " ' ' " ' "
26 WMaInSYMulHmotialCorrftlor6
/TS�ImP. . _. . ..... _ . _ " " _ ' _ , '
�7 EvsrprwnNdpMSSeNReuroaro
SUoO/MR . " _ _ _ _ _ _
28 qWSFIrSY.SEro�N�mloekStSE 9,300 9,300 9,300 9.300 9,300 9:300 55,800
p9 AUDurnAvsNE6'3rdSYNE
-PiCmtilan/mp�owiionts�
30 M'SY SE Corrltlor,8M SY SE to Aw5 _ _ - 8.000 8.000 '16.000
37 AWSBypaaR/wwlkOr.roSR/D _ - - 37,500 37,500 '37,500 N2,500
32 19N SYrwt SE 6�R SVM SE _ . . . . . ..
3j LwNlII.ROSepm�nH _ - - iB,300 18,300 18,30� 54,900�.
_... . .. . . . ..
9q Les N!I/Rtl Segm�nt S - " " " " .
35 �r M!I/Rtl Segmenf 3 - - - - 20.300 20,300 40,600,
36 ZZ�tl St NE 615[NEMtra�et/on _ - - - - - -
37 W��YNnP.SR-18rofEMSYSIV _ _ _ " ' _ '
38 ��/tlRd(4kaTappsPkwyCorr.)
39 AuOumWqCwtltloilmP .. " - ' " ' - '
. . . . . . .. ... . . . . .
40 M'SYSE6tBMSYSEIntAl�tylmp. _ . - 5.000 5,000 5,000 15�,000
41 AuOurn Wa➢���NE SlAndl ImP - " " ' ' " '
42 R St SE 61fa SY SEInt Sa/�tyhnp. - - - 5.000 5,000 S,OQO 15,000,
43 Maln'StnetSl9na/UPC�adoa�. _ _ " " " " _
dy R/wnq/kDrSENun-Mororlitllmp. _ _ �0,000 '10,000 t0,000 '10,000 40�,000
45 A Snsf SE Sa/aryMP.nudy - " " " . . . .- -
48 B�IIIMWHlantlMlHpatlon " " " - - - -
47 C1tywltl�Potls4rbnCraalnp - - " " " ' -
48 C/tyw/tlsArtarla/.Blcycb65�hty
/mp _ " " " " " "
48 ��bwn iranalfCntrACeealmP. " - - " - - -
50 ���Aw SE B Grean R/var Rd 5tudy _ _ _ _ _ _
51 hrtvurOanTrau6eadlmP. �. . � " - ' - - ' _
�52 /1SSE6BMSfSESelatyMp. _ _ _ _ _
53 nSDynamlcMesogeSlpna - - \ - 5,000 5,000 5,000 75,000
�$4 AWSSbaetmap/mprowm�nts - - - - �0.000 10.000 20.000
55 ii�/BcSl9nalsSehrylmprowmsnts ' ' ' ... _.. .._ . . .
56 A St SE 6 J]SY SEInf:Improwmarts 2,500 2.500 2,500 2,500 2.500 2:500 75,000
57 Local SIrNt Imprownanf Program . . _ . ... . ..
.. (Funtl10J). . ' ' - " - - -
5g 15t�SYrrt 5W Recon4rucHon " ' - " - - '
59 Laks'/appsParkwayPiaarwtlon _ _ _ . _ . _
60 Arter/o/SY.�FraarvaAon (Fend f03) ' " ' - - - '
6'I ARa/s/Grock Swl P/Op.(Funtl 105) _ _ _ _ . _ _
62 Aubu/nWyNPrawva[/en _ _ _ _ _ _ _
53 15t�SY NEMW Pra�rvotlen
. . . . ... .. . _ . _. _ _ ' ' ' " '
� Total f 88,707 S 96R07 S �OS,807 f 788,807 S 258,857 S '258,857 S 994,842
92
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER
Current Facilities
The City of Auburn water utility provides water supply, treatm.ent, transmission, storage,
distribution, and senrice connections to in-City residences and businesses. The City also
provides water to the City of Algona and Water District #111 under wholesale agreements. The
water system consists of wells, springs and interties for source; chlorination stations and
corrosion control for treatment; pump stations, pressure reducing stations and pipelines for
transmission; and steel and concrete enclosed reservoiPs for storage. Table W-1, "Facilities
Inventory', lists the facilities along with their current capacities and approximate locations.
Level ofiSe.rvice (LOS)
The Ci.ty's Comprehensive Water Plan summarizes the design criteria and service pofices for
the City'swafer disVibution system.
Capital Facili4ies Projects and Financing
The City of Auburn's water system anticipates seven capacity projects in the amount of
$16,593,665 anci eighteen non-capacity projects totaling $1.9,164,489 for a 6-year planning
expectation total of $35;758,154. The financing plan is shown in Table W-2 followed by
individual worksheets showing the project details.
The capacity projects wilf increase water supply quantities, storage, and distribution for growth
of retail customers. The non-capacity projects will provide for pip.eline improvements and
replacements, delivery pressure improvements, water quality enhancements, comprehensive
and resource management planning, pump station upgrades, telemetry system improvements,
and meter upgrades.
Impact on Future Operating B.udgets
As Table W-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $2,400 are forecasted for water supply and
distribution facilities during the six years 2017—2022.
93
City of Auburn Draft Capital Fgcilities Plam
TABLE W=.1
Facilities Inventory
Water Facilities
. --- --------c�rr�oF-ausuw�war�x s1!sr�w . . .. _------ ---
_ _ --- ----- ---
- _
caPAcirr
FACILITY _ _ _ _ _ WATER RIGHT (MGD -max rate) LOCATION
Water Su 1: -
Coal Geek Spnngs Certificate 8b7 9.7�2.52>' 3401 Stuck RiJerRd
Well7 Certificate 3560-A 3.17 1138 M St SE
Well 2 G1-00277 C 3.46 1109 5th°StNE
Well 3A G1-23629 C 4.03 401 37th StSE
We1l3B (InGudea'AboveJ (lncludedAbove) 40137thSt$E
We114 G1-20391 C 4.03 9b025thStSE
Well 5 Gf-23633 C 1.44 5530 JainesAVe SE
We115A (IncludedAbove) (IncludedAb.ove) 54010IiveWaySE
WeN58 (IncludedAbove) (IncludedAbove) Westendof62ndCtSE
Well 6 (Supplemental to Wells 1,2,3A,38,4) 5.04(supplemental) 1109 5th St NE'
Well 7 (Supplemental ro Wells 1,2,3A,38, 4) 5.04(supplemental) 405E SY NE
West Hill Spnngs Claim (1973 tile Date) 0.9 1900 15th StNWExt
Sii/iply Total(INGD) 26.73
Avallable for Use 24.21
'Derwtesdeduction,of 1,750 gpm(QV2;B24 ac-fUyr)to�cortply wRh the provisions of the�Muckleshoot-AubumBtipulated Agreement.
cnPacinr
FACILITY (MGD) , _LOCATION SERVICE AREA
Intertie - - ---"-
Tacoma�8 Street NW 3.2 3240 B St NW Valley.Service Area
Tacoma 132nd Ave SE 3:2 29598 132nd AVe�SE� Lea Hill Service Area
_.. . _ .. ... .
lnterlie Total(MGD) 6.4
--- -
CAPACITY . .
FACILITY (MG) LOCATION SERVICEAREA.__
Storape Facilitiesr ----
AcBdemy Reservoir 8A 1.0 5031 Aub urn Way S Arademy Service Area
Academy Resenroir 88 1.5 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Servrce Area
Lakeland Hills Resenroir 5 1.0 1326 57th Or SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area
Lakeland Hifls Resenroir 6 1.0 5718 Francis Gt SE Lakeland Hills SvcArea
__. _
Lea Hill Resenroir 4A 1.0 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Servrce Area
Lea Hill Resenroir 4B 1.5 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea HiII Service Area
Valley Resenroir 1 5.0 2003 Aub urn Way S Valley Service Area
Vafley Resenroir 2 3.6 32115105th Place$ ValleyService Area
Storage Tota/(MGJ 15.6 I
94
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-1 (continued)
Facilities Inventory
Water Facilities
CAPACITY
FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION
Booster Pump Stations:
Academy 1: 2 pumps 800 2004 Aub um Way S
Academy 2: 2 pumps 1;500 2004 Aub urn Way S
Academy East: 6 pumps 2,820 5031 Auburn Way S
Green RiVer. 4 pumps 4,680 29621 Green RiverRd SE
Intertie: 7 pumps 4;830 30502 132nd Ave SE
Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2,100 10406 Lea Hill Rd SE
Lakeland Hi!lsr 5 pumps 3,200 1118 57th Place SE
Wildemess Game Farm Pk: 2 purimps 1,050 2401 Stuck RiverRd
Terrace View. 3 pumps 1,500 6134AIexanderPlace SE
CAPACITY
Primary Valve
FACILITY____ (PSI - InIeUOuUet) LOCATION
_ _ __
Piess"ure Reducin.q tatioris:
_- --
Serves Valley Pressure Zone:
Howerd Road CCF#1011-10 82/65 Howard Rd
Howard Road CCF By-Pass #1011-20 - Howard Rd(eypass)
25th Street SE#1110-10 (Offline) - 25th StSE&KStSE
Rivenaalk#1111-20 90/50 27th St.SE&27th Place SE
Riventielk #1111-10 109/55 Riverwalk Dr SE&Howard Rd
Serves Lea Hill:
Ambe�ViewNorth #711-10 150/65 105th PI SE&320th PI
Amber View South #711-20 142/60 106th Pl SE Near Reservoir 2
_
Gariage Square Lo�ter#611-10 16�65 Lea Hill Rd SE
Carriage Square Middle #641-20 140/65 Lea HiII Rd& 106 PI
Carriage Square Upper#611�0 14�60 Lea Hill Rd& 107 PI
Cobb/e Geek Lower#411-20 8&/40 SE 304th PI&SE 101st Place
Cobble Geek Upper#411-10 94/55 104th Ave SE(South of 303rd Road)
Lea HiIF#412-10 90/45 SE 298th Place & 109 Ave SE
Lea HiN#412-30 WC 300 elock & 108th Ave SE
Lea HiII#511-10 87/45 304th St. SE West of 108th Ave
Lea Hill#i512-10 80/50 304th St.SE West of 112th Ave
ServesAcademy:
Aubum Way S.outh #1011-30 130/80 2003 Auburn Way S
Aubum Way So.uth #111410 130/80 4500 Aubum Way S
Serves Jannsen Additlon:
_ .._ _ _. .
Jannsen #1216-10 72/58 6100 Block&.35fh Way SE
95
City of Auburn Draft Capital F'acilities Plan
TABLE'W-1 (continued)
Facili4ies Inventory
Water Facilities
cnPaanr
Primary Valve
FACILITY (PSI - InIeUOutlet) LOGATION
Serves Lakeland Hills
Lakeland HiNs#1309->0 105/55 MSII Pond Dr @ Oravetr Rd
Lakeland Nills#1310-10 130/55 Mfill Pond Dr&A�GII Pond Loop
Lakeland Hills#1409-10 N/C Orave� &Lakeland Hids Way
Lakeland�fiills�#1409-20 120/56� 4Zth SE 8 Lakeland Hills Way
Lakela"n'd l-liNs#1409-30 95l70 Lakeland Ni!ls Way 6iakeland Hills Lp
Lakeland Hi!!s#1409-40 84/55 MSII Pond Dr&Lakeland Hills Way
Lakeland HiNs#1410->0 103/50 4900 8/ock &HSII Pond Dr
Lakeland Mr1/s#1410-20 N/C 51st St SE east ofMill Pond Loop
Lakeland Hi!!s#14f0-30 125/62 Nathan Ave &Highland D�
Lakeland Hihs#1410-40 82/55 Quincy Ave N of 53rd St SE
Lakeland Hills#14N->0 80/42 BehnettAve 6 56th Ave SE
- _
Lakeland Hills#>411-20 82/55 5314 BennettAve SE
Lakeland Hills#141>-30 155/73 5100 Kersey Way
Lakeland l-lills#Y41?-40 92/52 54th St SE
Lakeland Hills#1411-50 85/44 WesNy.Ave SE
Lakeland Flills#1412-10 82/55 8539 Franklin AveSE
LakelandHills#1509->0 174/60 TeiraceVrewLoi6er(6170)
Lakeland Hills#1509-20 160A3 Terrace ViewA?rddle(5960)
6akeland Hills#1509-30 138/47 Terrace View Upper(5810)
Lakela"nd Hills#>509-40 230/90 Temece View&Alezsnder Place SE
Lakeland Hills#1510-10 N/C Lakeland Hills Way 6:Evergreen Way
WC- Normally Closed
cAPaarv
FACI LITY (GPM) LOCATI ON
Corrosion ConD-o!
Howard Road 5,550 2101 Howard!2d SE
FulmerField 9,375 1113 Sth St NE
ChlorinaGon Stations:
Coal Creek Springs Station 5,000(graviry feed) 3401 Stuck River Rd
West hlill Springs Station 625(graviry feed) 1900 15fh St NW
Well 4 2,600 950 25th;St SE
Wefl 56 600 1100 63[d St SE
Wel15A 180 5401 0/ive Ave SE
-- --- ----- — " -BRAUNWOOD.`SATEL:LITE Wi4TQt SYSTBVI ",.� - -- -------
FA6ILITY CAPACITY LOCATION
Water Su l :
Braunwvod Satellite#1 0.03 MGD 4501 47thStSE
Storape Facili5es:
Braunvwod Safellite 1 0.03 AAG 4501 47th St SE
Booster_Pump,Statlonsi
Braunwoodr 3 Pumps 2A GPM 4501 47th St SE
96
Cit,y ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE'W-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
WATER DIVISION
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2027 Total
CaPacfty Pro}ects: .
1 Fulmer Well Reld Improvements
Capital CosS 100,000 800,000 - - - - 900,000
Funtling Souroes:
Water FunC 100,000 800,000 - - - - 900,000
BondProceeds - - - - - -
2 Cascatle Water Alllsnce Water Purchase
Capita.I CosLs - 532,561 532,5¢1 532,561 2,164,491 2,164,491 5,926,665
Funding�Sources:
Wate.rFuntl - 532,561 532,561 532,581 2,164,491 2,164,49� 5,926,685
Bontl.Proceeds - - - - - -
3 AeademyPumpStatlon#1 PumpReplacement
Capital Costs - 925,000 1,200,000 - - - 2,725,000
Funding Sources:
4Vater Fund - - - - - - _
Bond:P�oceeds - 925,000 1,200,000 - - - 2,725,000
4 Coal Geek Springs Reha6ilitation
Capital Costs - - 800,000 2,600.000 - - 3p00,000
Funding Sources:
Weter Funtl - - - - - - _
Bond Proceeds - - 800,000 2,600,000 - - .3A00,000
5 IMertte Booster Pump Station trnprovemeMs
Capital Costs - - - - - 1,303,000 1,303,000
Funding Sources:
Water Fund - - - - - 1�,303,000 7,303,000
Bond?roceeds - - - - -
6 Algona We111 Deeommissioning ���"
Capihal Costs - 39,OD0 - - -, - 39,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFuntl - 39,000 - - - - 39,000
Bond Proceeds - -
7 Mnual Distributlon 3ystem Improoements Program
Capital CosLs - 300,000 1,000,000 300.000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFuntl - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,OOO,D00 300,000 2,800,000
BonC Proceeds - - - - - -
Subtofal.Capaeltv Proiects:
CapiMal Costs 700,000 2,596,567 3,532,567 3,432,561 3,164,491 3�,767,491 16,593,665
Non-Caoackv Prolects:
8 4een Rlver PS Emergeney Power
Capital Costs - 90,000 600,000 - - - 690,000
Funtling Sources:
Water Fund - 90,000 600,000 - - -. 690,000
Bond Proceeds - - -� - - _
97
City of Auburn Drgft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-2(continued)
2076 2017 2018 2019--_- - . 2020_._ .__2021_-_ _- _Total__..
Non-Cauadri P�olects: . . __ .._ . - --. .__ �-_ .:� - - ._�. . . . . _ _ . . . .
9 Well Iespeetion and RedevelopmeM Progrsm
Capital Costs - 150,000 - 150,000 - - 300,000
Funding Sources: �
WaterFund - 150,000 - 150,000 - - 300,U00
Bond.Proceeds - - - - - - -
10 Water Repair 8 Replacemerrts -
CapitalCosts - - 300,000 �,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000
Funding��Sources:
VVaterFund - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
1�1 MRMasterMetera
Capital Costs 430,000 - - - - - 430,000
Fu nding�Souroes;
WaterFund 30.000 - - - -. - 30,000
Bond Froceeds _ _ .. 400,000._ . _ c. . c. ._ c - - 400A00
.. _ _. _. _ .. .
12 Street Utilky.lm{irove_meMs
Capital Costs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000
Funding Sources:
_ . . . _ . . . .. . _ . .. .
Water Fund 150,000 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2;250,000
Bond.Proceeds 350,000 400.000 - - - - 750,000
13 Lea Hill PRV�Station Impro�ments
CapiNal CosS 75,000 625,000 - - - - 700,000
Fu_ndirig Sources:
WaterFund -� 250,000 - - - - �250,000
Bond Proceeds 75,000 375,000 - - -� - d50,000
14 Water Meter&Bflling System ImproVemeMs
Capital GosLs 2,045.000 3,195,000 - -. - -. 5,240A00
Funding Souroes:
WaterFund - - - - - - .
Bond Proceeds 2,045.000 3,195,000 . -_ -_ __. _ _ -_ - _.. . ___._.__ 5,240,000
15 Utilities Feld OperaUo�Center
Capital CosS - 300,000 - - - - 300,000
Funding Sources: �
N/aterEund - 100,000 - - - - 700,000
Other:-SewerFund - 100,000 - - - - 700,000
Other_Storm Fund - 100,000 - - - - 100,000
16 West H{II Spri�gs Improye_ments
Capital Cosb �554,489 - - �- - - 554,489
Funding Sources:
WaffirFund 99,489 - - - - - 99p89
Bond Proceeds 455,OOb - - - - - 455,000
17-Reservofr Sefsm le'ReAabilitation
.. _ _ ... _ _. . ... .. .. ....
Capital,Cosis - - 357,500 357,500 - - N5,000
Funding Sources:
Water Fund - - 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - �-�
98
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-2(continued)
2076 2ot7 2018__. .2o7s 2020 2021 rotal
Non-Capacky.Prolects:
18 Le�a Hill-132iM Ave Distribution System Modifications
Capital CosLs 75,000 325,000 - - - - 400,000
Funding��Sourees:
WaterFund - - - - - - •
Bond Proceeds 75,000 325,000 - - - - 400,000
19 Auburn Way South-Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood
Capital Costs 865,000 - - - - - 665,000
Funding:Sources:
WaterFund 885,000 - - - - • 685,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
20 tteservoh PaiMing
Capital Cosis - - - - 1 Q50,000 - 1,250,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFund - - - - 125b,000 - 1,250,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
21 24"Whke River Crossing
Capital Costs - 450,000 850,000 - - - 1,300,000
Funding��Sources:
Water Fund - - - - - - -
� Bond�Proceeds - 450,000 850,000 - - - 1,300,000
22 F Street SE Non-Motorized improvements
Capital Costs - 250,000 - - - - 250,000
Funding�Sources:
Water Fund - 250,000 - - - - 250,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
23 M Street SE Storm Imprrnamerrts
Capiql Cosis 250,000 - - - - - 250,000
Funding.Souroes:
Water Fund 250,U00 - - - - - 250,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
24 Reservofr Repafr and Replacements
Capital Costs - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
FundingBources:
WaterFund - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Bond�Proceeds - - - - . . . .-
25 Pipeline/!sset Mana�gement Study
Capital CosLs - - 50,000 - - - 50,000
Funding Sources:
Water Fund - - 50,000 - - - 50,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
SuMotal,Non�Capacitv Projects:
Capital Costs 4,814,489 5,935,000 2,707,500 2,057,500 2,100,000 1,550,000 19,164,489
99
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-T(continued)
SUMMARY:
2016 2017 2018 2079 2020 2021 Tctal
CAPRALCOST$
_
CapacityProjects 100,000 2,596,561 3,532,561 3;432,561 3,164,491 3,767,491 16,593,665
Non-CapaciryProjects 4,814;489 5;935,000 2,707,500 2,057,500 2;100,000 1,550,000 19;164,489
ToFal Costs 4,914,469 8,537,567 8,240,061 SA90,061 5;264,491 5,317,497 35,758,754
RINDINC SOURCES:
WaterFund 1,514;489 2,661,561 3,390,061 2,890,061 5;264,491 5,317,491 21,038,154
Other-SewerFund - 100,000 - - - - 100,000
Other-Storm Fund - 100,000 - - - - 100,000
Bond Proceeds 3,400,000 5,670,000 2,850,000 2,600,000 - - 14,520,000
T'oial Funding 4,914f489 8,531,567 6,240,061 5,49U,061 5,264,491 5,317,491 35,758,154
100
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilkfes Plan
Six Year Capkal Faciikies Plan,2016-2027 Enterprise Eunds
ProjectTitle: Fulmer Well Field Improvements
Project No: cp1107
ProjectType: Capacity
eroject Marogec Fenhaus /Vondrak
Description:
Edaluate Wells 2,6 and 7 and the Fulmer Field Corrosion Control Treatrnerrt Facility to assess�the supply and treatmen4
capacity of the epsting facilities and inTrasVucture..The evaluatlon will include an assessment of individual and total well
supply capacities,along�willi a reHew of the VeaVnent faci.lityoperatirig and control parameters. The evaluation will also
incorporate reaortimeniiationsforfacilityimpro�emerrts.
2015 Comprehensive UVater Plan CIP ID S-19
ProgressSummary:
The first phase of the study is complete.Recommended equipmerrt will be designed and installed in 2016 and 2017.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
No significarrt impact
Activity;:.
2073 YE 2016 Year End
Fundi�8 Sourcex Prfor to 2075 �Estimate 2076 Butlget 2017 Budget ProJeetTotel
UniesWctei/WafelRevenue 2,855 - 100,000 B00,000 102,855
Grents(Fetl,State,Cocal) - - - - -
BondProceeds 833,247 200,000 - - 1,033,247
Other _
TotalFundin95ources 838,702 200,000 700,000 800,000 1;136;102
CaPltal F�cpendiWres
Design 836,102 60,000 700,000 - 996,102
Right oi Way " " - " '
Canstruction 140,000 800,000 140,000
Total ExpendiWres 836,102 200,000 700,000 800,000 1,736;702
Forecasted Project Cost:
rotal
. 2018 2019 2020 2021 2076-2021.
FunOingSources .. .-- - . . .'-"' - ' - � '- -
Unrestncted Water Revenue - - - - 900,000
Grants(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Tofnl FunAinA Sourcex � � � - _ -- � - - 900;000
Capital ExpendiWres:
Design - - - - 100,000
Right of INay - - - - -
ConsWction 800,000
Total Ezpendid�ies - - - - 900,000
1�1
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilities Plan
Six Year Capkal PaciliNes,Plan,20162021_. Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase
Project No:. Cpxxxx
Projec4Type: CapaCity
Project Mareger: TBD
Desc�iption;:
Financing to purchase water from adjaceM purveyors to meet projected demand based on agreements:with Cascade Water
Alliance. Council approyed the agreemenfs for permanent and resenre wholesale supply in$eptember2013.A rrew
agreement wilh Tacoma was eice:auted in 2014.
2015 ComprehensiVe Water Plan CIP ID S-04
- - — --- — -
Progre§s Surtimary'
Planned
Future Impact on OpereUng Budget:
Norie
Activlty:
2015 YE 2p18 Year.End
FundingSources Prlorm2013 Effilmate 20t68udget 2017Budget Pro)eetTofel_
Unrastdeted Wefar Reosnue - - - 532,567 -
Grants.(Fed,Stete,Loceq - - - �- -
AaM Proceeds ' - ' - '
O[hBf
TOfal Fun0ing SwrceS - . - 532,581 �•�
Capltal.ExPendituras
WaterBupply Cfierges - - - 532,561 -
RlgM d WaY _ ' ' ' _
Conshuction
Total�Expentlittires ' ' ' S32,561 -�
� Forecasted Project Cost: � --- - - - -- -- ---.. ... ..
Ta1al
2078 .2019 2020 2021 2018-2021
Funiling Sources
. . . . . __ . .. .. . ..
UnrestnctedWeterRewnue 532,561 532,561 2,164,491 2,164,497 5,926,665
Grents(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - - -
Bond P�oceeds - - - - -
Other - -
Total Funtling Sourees 532,561 432;581- � 2:764;491 ---'.2.164"491"- -- -5.926,8&R
Gapltal-Ezpendltuns
Weter5upplyCtielges 532,567 532,561 2,164,491 2,164,491 5,926,665
Right of Way ' ' - - -
ConSbuCNon
Total ExpenAitures 532.561 532,567 2,764.491 �2,164,497 �.5,926,665
1�2
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilities Plan
Siic Year Capkal Facilides Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Description:
The pump station is reachirig the end of its�useful life.The projeot iniill al$o increase the pump station capacityto meet peak
_ . . . . .. _. . . . . . .
demands and fire flow requiremeMs,and provide tiackup power generation.
2015 Comprehersiw Plan C� ID PS-07
Progress Summary:
Planned
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No significant impact.
Activity:
Z015 YE. 2076 Year End
Funding Sourcos Prior to 2075 Es[imate 2016 Budget 2017 Bud9et Project Total
UnrasMcted Weter Re�enue - - - - -
Grants(FeU,State.LocaQ ' ' - ' '
BondPioceeds - - - 925,000 -
OMre�
Total Funtling Sources - - - 925,000 -
CapiTal F�cpenditures:
Design - - - 325,000
Right M Wey ' - - ' -
QOIIS�NC�l00 ��,���
Total EspentliWres � ' ' ' 925,000 -
Fora¢asted Projeet Cost:
7ofal
20t8 2079 2020 2021 20162027
Funtling.Sourcex � . ..... . . . ... . ._._".
UniasMicted Water Revenue - - - - -
Gisnts(Fed,Slate,Local) - - - - -
BondProceeds 7,200,000 - - - 2,125,000
Other
Total Funding.5ourcea 1,200,000� = - • 2,125,000�
Cepitel Erzpefldifure�
Design ' ' ' ' 325.000
Righto/Way - - - - -
Construction 1,200,000 - 1,800,000
Tofal Fxpendlwres 7,200,000 � - - - 2,125,000
103
City ofAuburn Draft CapitaCFacilities Plan
WATER FUND (4,30) Capltal Facllkles Plan
:Six Year Capifal Facilltles�.Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise-Funds
ProjectTne; Coal Greek Springs Rehabilitation
Project No: CpXXXX
ProjecCType: CapaClty
PmjectManager. TBD
Desoription:
Rehabilitation of the Coai.Creek�Springs middle collector will Improve capacity of the springs resulting in,greater utilization of the
water rigM.�
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-09. '
PiogressSummaryc _ _ -- -- --. -- - -- --
Plarmed
Puture Impact on Operating'Budget:
No significant impact -
Activity:
2015 VE' 2076Year End
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 E4lmafe 20'IB Budget 2017 BudBst ProJect Total
Unrestrictetl Weter Re�enue - - - - -
G�ants(Fed,State.LocaQ ' ' ' ' '
PWTFL ' ' ' ' '.
Bond Proceeds
Tofal Fundfng�Sourms - - _ �- �� ' - '
Eaplfal ExpendlWros
Oesign - - - - -
Right o/WaY ' - - ' '
Construcfion -
� Tofal ExPendihrtes _ _ _ - _- _- _ _ _ - _ _ __.- '
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 2M1 20762021
Funtling Sources:
Unrestncted�Weter Revenue - - - - -
Grents(Fed,Stete,Loca/) - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - -
Baitl Pticaeds ._ . 800�000. . _ 2.600.000____ _. _______ __ c . ___.. _3.40Q000.
Totel Fundln9.5ources 800.000 2,600,000 -� - �.3,400,000�
Capital ExpentliWres
Dasign 500,000 - - - 500,000
R(gh�oi Way - - - - -
Constmctlon 300,000 2,600,000 2,900,000
Tofal ExpenAltures - -800,000� 2;600;000 � - - � - 3,400,000
1�
Ci_ty of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilRies Plan
�Sbc Year Capifal Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTine: Interfie Booster Pump Station Improvements
Project No: Cpxxxx
ProjectType: CapaCity
ProjectManager. TBD
Description: � � � � -
Increase thepump station capacity.to meet peak demands and.fire flow requiremeMs.
2015.Comprehensive Plan CIP ID PS-04
ProgressSummary:
Planned
Future�lmpact on Operating Bud'get: � � �� � �
No significarrt impact
Activity:
2015 YE 21116 Year End
FunAing Sources Prior to 2015 FSHmate 2076 Budget 2017 Budget ProJect Total
Unresfncted Water Rewnue - - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Ploceeds - - - • -
o�na� .
Tmal Funding Sources - - - - - - -�� ---
CaPftal Eiipendituies
Design - - - - -
Right o)LVaY ' - - - '
CdISINCt1011
Total ExpendiWrcx . .. ' ' ' " " ""� --
Forecasted Project Cost:
7ota�
2018 .2019 2020 2021 201&2021
Funding Sources
UnresMctedWaterRe�enue - - - 1,303,000 1,303,000
Grants(Fed,Stata,Loca!) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' - - ' '
Other
Tofal Funding Sourcoa - -. - 7,303,000 1,303,000
CaP�I ExpendiWres
Uesign - - - 153,000 153,000
Right o/WaY ' ' _ ' '
Conshuction 1,150,000 1,150,000
Total EzpendiNres - - - 1,303,000 1,303,000
1�5
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Fkcilities Plan
_ .
- - -
WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilities Plan
Six Yea�CapitalFacilfHes Plan,20162027 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitie: Algona We111 Decommissioning
Project No; epx�[xic
ProjectType: Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
- - - _
escr pt on:
--._ ___
Algona well has been temporariy abandoned and all related facilities remotietl.This project:will haVe tFiewell p"ropedy
decommissioned by a State of N/ashington-licensed weli driller.
2015.Compreheruive Plan CIP ID 5-14
Progress Summary:
Plarmed
. _ _. . . ._ ._. . . _ ._ - - . _ .
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: -
No significant impact
ActivHy:�.
� 2015 YE 2p16 Year End
FundingSources PAorto2015 E4imaro 2076Budgat 2077�Budget ProJect7oTel
UnresVicted Weter Re�nue - - - 39,000 -
Grants(Fetl,State,Locap - - - - -
Bond�Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other
Total FunCing Sources - - _ � 39,000 � - - _--
Capifal Expenilitures
Design ' ' ' ' -,
Ri9ht o/WaY ' _ ' " '
ConstNction 39,000
Total Ezpenditures - � - - 39,000 -
Forecasted��PFoJectCost: - � - � - � �-- �-�-�-
7ofal
2018 2019 2040 2021 2016-2021
Funding8ources
UnresMcted��WateYReventie - - - - 39,000
G�ants(Fed,Sta[e;L'ocaq - - - - � -�
Bond Pioceeds ' - ' - '
aher
Tofal Puntling'.Sources - - - . �39,000
Caplfal Expenditures
Design - - - - -
RigAt of Way - - - - -
Cons6uction .39,000.
Tofal Fiipenditures - - - . 39,000
106
City of Auburn Draft Capitgl Facilities Plan
--- --- - - -
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Fadlities Plan,2016-2021 EnterpriseFunds
ProjectTtle: Annual Distribution System Improvements Program
ProjectNo: CpXXXX
Projectrype: Capacity
ProjectMaroger: TBD
Desaription: -
Capacity-related improvemerrts to the water distribution system to address low pressures during peak trour demand and
fire flows.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-02
Progress Summary:
Planned
Future Impact odOperating Budgeth � � � - - � -
No significarrt impact
Activity:
�2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sources Prior to 20'IS EsGmate 2076 Butl et 2017 Budget Projee[Totel
Unrestncted Wa1er Reveniie - - • 300,000 -
Grants(Fed,State,local) - - - - � -
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Fundfng Sources - - - 300,000 -
Capital ExpentliWrex
� Design - - - 300,000 -
Right o(WaY " ' ' ' '
Construction
Total ExPanditurea .. . " ' ' 300,000 -
Forecasted.Project Cost:
Tota I
2078 2019 2020 2021 201fr2027. .
Funding Sotirces -
UmestncfedWaterRe�nue 1,000,000 300,000 7,000,000 300,000 2,900,000
Grdnts(Fed,State,Local) - - - _ - _
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other
Tofal Funding Sairces 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2.900,000�
CaPifal Expenditures
Design - 300.000 - 300,000 900,000
Right o/WaY ' ' ' ' '
Conshuction 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
._._. . .. . -_ . _ -
Total Expantli[ures: 1,000,000 300,000 7,000;000� - 300;000 � 2,900,000
107
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plgn
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilkies Plan
SocYearCapitalFacilldes;Plan,2016-2027_ __ . _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ __ ErKerprise_Funds
ProjectTitte: Green River Pump Station Emergency Power
ProjectNo: CpXXXx
ProjeaType: Non Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Descrlption: . _ . . _ _ _ ._ . _ . . . - - _--_ - _
Construction of facility improvements W house an emergency generator and associated electrical equipment.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID PS-03
Progress Summary:
Planned
Future Impact on OperatingBudget:
The annual maiMenance cost is estimated to be approbmately$600.
Activity:
2015 VE 20�BYeacEntl
Funding�.Sources Priorto2075 Eatlmate 2016-Budpet 2017�Butlget ProjeetTotal
Unrestncted Weter Re�enue - - - 90,000 -
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - -� - -
Bond Procaeds - - - - -
Other
Total Funding�Sources - - - 90,000 -
Capital FxPeridilurex
Desi4n ' ' ' 90.000 -
Right of INaY ' ' ' ' '
Constniction
Total ExpandiL�res ' ' " 90,000 •
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2018 2018 2020 .2021. 201fi2021 _
FundingSourcax - _ . _.._-.___ . ._ _. _. — ._ __. . . . _____ _
UnresMctedWaterReveniie 600,000 - - - 890,000
Giants(Fed;Stete,Local) - - - - -
Bond Pmceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other
Total Funding Sourcas 600,000 - . - 690,OU0
Capital ExpendiWres
Design - - - - 90,000
Right of.Way - - - - -
Conshuction . 600,000. _ - 600,000 �
Total Expendltures 600,000 � • - - 690,000
1�g
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- -
VNATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTine: Well Inspection and Redevelopment Program
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectMaroger: TBD
De"soriptionF � � -
Program for inspection and redevelopment of suppy wells and spnngs necessaryto ensure production at mapmum
capaoity for eificieM uti lization.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-07
Progress Summary: �
Planned
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No significaM impact
Activity:
2014 YE 2076 Year End
Funding Sourees: PAorOo 2075 Estlmate 2018 Budeet 2077 Budget Projac[Total
Unresfncted Wafer Revenue - - - 150,000 -
Grants(FedState,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
Other
Tofal FunCing Sources - - 150,000 -
Capital Expenditures
Design - - - - -
Righf d Wey - - - - -
Consfrucfion 150,000 150.000
roai�f,enaiares - - - uo,000 -
Foreeastad Project Cost:
7ofa I
2078 2019 2020 2027 2018-2021
FunAingSourcea - � �-� �- � �
UnresMctedWaterRevenue - 150,000 - - .300,000
Grants(Fed,5late,loca/) , - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
01her -
TofalFundingSourees "� " - _ "" �-- -" 150,000 - � �" - 300,000
Capital Fiipenditures
Design - ' ' - '
Right o/WeY ' ' ' ' '
Conshuction 150.000 300,000
Total Expendtpires - 750,000 - - 300,000
109
City ofAuburn Draft Capita!Facilities Plan
- -
WATER FUND (430) Cap�tai Facllkies Plan
Siz Year Capital Facii'fies Plan,2016-2027 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Water Repair & Replacements
Project No: cpx7c�tx
Pro�ectType: Non-Capacity (R8R)
ProjectManage�: Va�i0U3
__- - - -�- - - -..
Description:
Distribu6on system rePair and replacement projeots req�rired foY mee6rig peak demarufs and:ieducing system losses.
Projects wiil be coordinated with�the Local�Street Program and other utility projects.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-09
- - - — - _. . . .
Progress Summary:
Pianned
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
No significaM impact
Activlty:
2015 YE 20�8 Year.End
Funding�$ources PAor W 2015 Estlmate 2076 Butlget 2017 Budget ProJect Total
Urnestricted Water Rewnue - - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - . -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' - '
Otlrer
Total Funding Swrcex - - - = �- � - -
. ..... _ . _.... .._ . _ .
CaPllal 6[pendiWres
Design - - - .. -
Righto/Way - - - - -
COI�SfNCfiOl1
Total F�cpentlitures: - - - • - -
Forecasted:Piojeet Co.std
Totel
2078 2079 2020 2021 207&2027 _ _
FundingSource.x �
UnrestrictedWaterRewnue 300,000 1,000,000 3U0,000 1,000,000 2,600,000�
Granfs(Fed,Stafe,Local) - - - - . -
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
Othe�
Total FurMing Sourcas -� 300,000" 7,000;000 -300,000- - � �1;000;000 -- � �2,600,000-
CaPifal F�ipenditures
�� Design 300,000 - 300.000 - 600,000
Right o/Way ..- . ..- .. .
ConshucNon 1,000.000 1,000,000 .2,000.000
Total F�cpendlWres 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1�,000,000 Y,600,000
11�
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
VNi4TER FUND (430) Capital Facilkles Plan
Six Year Capffal Facilflies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funtls
ProjectTiUe: Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Master Meters
Project No: cp1411
Projectrype: Non-Capacity
ProjectMareger. Cha1m2�S
�Deseription: � -
Ins}all master meters to Muckleshoot Indian Tribe properties to ease accouM administration.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID G-06
Progress Summary: �
Design and construcdon of master meter stadoru are arrocipated to be completed in 2016.
Future Impaet on Operating Budg'et:
No significarrt impact
Activity:
2013 VE. 2078 Year End
Funding Sources: Prlor to 2015 E4lmate ZO78 Budgat 2017 Butlpet . ProjectTotal
UniestncledWaterRe�nue � 4,419 �45,581 30,000 - -80;000
Grants(Fed;State,Loca/) - - - - -
BondProceads - - 400,000 - 400,000
OMer
Total Funtling Sources: 4,419 45,587 430,000 - 480,000
Capital Expendiwres
Design 4,419 45,581 30,000 - 80,000
Right o(Way - - - - _
Conshvction 4pp.Opp qpp.ppp.
Total Erzpendiares' 4,479 45,587 430,000 �-� 480,000
Forecasted Project Cost: � � -� - - "�
Tofe l
2018 2019 2020 2027 2016�2021
Funafng sou_rcex
Umestrrcted Weter Rewnue - - - 30,000
Grants(Fetl,State,Local) - - _ _. �- _
BondPticeeds - - - - 400,000
Other
Total Funding Sources —��-- �" 430,000
Caplfal ExpendiNrcs
Design - - - - 30,000
Right o/Way - - _ _ _
ConSfNCtion _400,000
Total ExpendiWres: - - - - 430,000
111
City ofAuburn Draft Cqpital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capkai FacilkiesPlan
Soc Year Capi�al Facilities Plan,2016-2021 EnterpriseFunds
ProjectTitle: Street Utility ImproVements
Project No: wabd01
FrojebtType: Non-Capacity
ProjectMareger. TBD
Desarlption:
Water main improvements in coordination�with the$ave our Streets�,(SOS)program.anil gerSeral arterial street
improvements.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-06
Progress Summary:
F'larned
_ . . _ _ . . - - - - � -
Future Impaat on Operating Budget:
No�significarrt impact
Activity: �-�� - � -- -. . .
- .2075 YE- 2018 Year.End
Funding Sotir�es Prlor to 2015 EWmate 20'16 Budgat .2017 Budgat Pro�aet Total.
UmesMcfedWeterRewnue - 500,000 150,000 100,000 650,OOG
Grants(Fed,Stete.local) ' ' - ' '
BonqProceeds - - 350,000 400,000 350,000
Other
Tofal FunEing Sourcea. - 500;000 500,000; - - -500,000- �� " � Y,000,000'
Capttal EzpenAlturaa
.. . peslqn ' ' ' ' '
R7ghf of WaY ' ' ' ' _
co�swouoi, soo,000 soo.000._ _ soo.000 r.000,000
rornr���a�n,re� • soo,000 wo,000 wo.000 �,000,000
- - - -
Fqreaasted Projegt Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2f120 2021 2016-2027
Funding Scurces
UnresWctedWaterRevenile 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,250,000
Grents(Fed,State;Loce/) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' 750,000.
Otlrer
Total Funding Sourcea 500.000 500,000 500.000 500.000 3,000,000"
CaPital EupendiWns
. ._ . .-�Desi9^ ' _ ' ' '
- Rlght of WeY ' ' ' ' '
ConsWctlon 500,000 500,000 500,000 SU0,000 3,U00,000
Total Ex{ienditu'es 500.000 500,000 500.OQ0 500,000 3,000,000� �
112
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _
WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilitYes Plan
SIz Yea�Capi[al Facflkies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise.Funds
ProjectTipe: Lea Hill PRV Station Improvements
ProjectNo: Cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Description•
Replace pressure reducing valoe stations in fhe Lea Hill area. Epsting statioru are old,difficutt to access and are typicaly
flooded. �They do not haoe sump pumps or proper drainage W remove water that enters the stations. Mainhaining the
stations.is ditficult This is a safety issue and a health issue.
2015 Compreheruive Plan CIP ID D-13
Progress Summary:.
Planned
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
No significant impact.
/►ctivity:
2015 YE� 2018 Year End
Funding Sources Prlor W 2015 Fstlmate 2016 Budget 2017 Butlget ProJeet Tofel
UnresMcted Wetei Revenue - - - 250,000 -
�Grants(Fed,Sfate,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - 75,000 375,000 75;000
Other
TMaI Funding Sourcex - - 75,000 625,000 15,000.
Capital Expen0lqires
Design - - 75,000 - 75;000
Right o/Wey " ' - - '
Construction 625,000
Totnl ExpendiWrex - - 75,000 625,000 75,000
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
�2018 2078_. 2020 2021 1078-2027.
Funding Sources - - - �� -
UnrestActedWaferRevanue - - - 250,000
Grants(Fed,Sfafe,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - 450,000
Othe�
Total Funtling Sourees -� - - - 700,000�
Capital ExpendlWres: '
Design - - - - 75,000
Rlghto/Way -� - - - -
Constructlon - 625.000
Total Expendiwres - - - - 700,000
113
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capka�.Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capkal Faci118es�Plan,2016-2021 Enterprlse FunHs
Pro�ectrtle: Watar Meter Sc Billing System Improvements
ProjectNo: cp7317
ProjectType: Non-Capatity
ProjectMaroger. Snyder/Fenhaus
Despriptfon;
Based on a completed�shrdy,implement and construct selected impro�,emerrts in automated metering tecMrology,.generally
referred to as:Advariced Metenng Udrastruchire(AMI). Benefits inoluCe more accurate me;er reads,daily infortnation for
quicker detection of leaks,and improved efficiencyof billing operations.
2015'CompreFiensive Plan CIPiD G-09
Progress Summary:�
Study is�complete. tristallation of ineters and metering irdrastructure to tiegin in 2015.
Fufure.lmpact on Operating Budgetc�
No significarrt impact
Activity:
Zb�s i� zuta rear ena
Funding Sources Prior W 2015 E4imate 20188utl et 2077 Butlget ProJectTotal
UnresMctetlWeferRe�enue - 276,000 - 276,000
G2nts.(FeO,Sfate,Local) - - - - -
BontlProceeds 25,753 468,297 2,045.000 3,195,000� 2,539;OSC
Other
Total.FunEingSourqs 25,763 766,28T 2,046,000 3,195,000 2,815,050
Capital-ExpentllWres
Design 25,753 44,297 - 10,050
Right ol Way - - - - -
Constivcf/on 700.000 2:045.000 .3,795.000 _2:745.000.
Total ExpenEltures 23,753 744.297 2,045.000 3.195.000 2.815,050
Forecasted Project CosY. '
rorni
zo�a zo�a zozo 2o2i 2ote.sos�
Funding Sources:
UnrestActed Water Revenue - - - - -
Grants.(Fed,Stafe,LocaQ - - - -
BondProceeds - - - - 5,240,000
Other
Tolal Funding Sourcas: - � - • - 5,240,000
Capital Ezpentlliures
Deslgn ' ' ' ' '
Rlghlo/Way - - - - -
ConsWction - .5.240,OW.
Tofal.Ezpentlituros - - - - 5.240.000
�6rants/�Other Soumes:-. � . -. . . . -. . . .-.. � .. .- . ".. . '"
Bond proceetls from 2013 issuence.
Arrtldpate bond�issuance in 2016. �
114
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilitles Plen
Siic Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjactTi9e: Utilities Field Operations Center
Project No: wabd04
ProjectType: NOn-CapaCity
- ProjectMareger. TBD
Descriptlon:
Construct building for utilities field staff use and storage of field equipmeM.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID G-05
Progress Summaryi -
Future Impad on Operating Budget:.
No significaM impact
Activlty: � - -
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Fundin9 Sources: Pdor to.2075 Estlmate_ 2016 Butlget 2077 Butlget ProJectTotal
UnrestncfedWelerRevenue - - - 100.000 -
Grants(Fed,Sfete,Loceq - - - -
Ofhei operafing-trans/er in SeHer - - - 100,000 -
Ofher opereting-lrens/er in Stam 100.000
Tmal Funiling Sources - - - 300,000 -
Capifal Expendihires '
Des9� ' - - _ .
Right o/Way - - - - -
Consbuction 300,000
Tofal FicpenCiWres - - - 300,000 .
Forecasted Project Cost
7oal
.. 2018. .2019 2020 2021 2016-2021.
Funding Soprces - -" " � � -
Uniestncfed Water Re�nue - - - - 100,000
G�ants(Fed,Sfate,Loca/) - - - - -
Other opereting-(2nsfer in Sexer - - - - 100,000
Other operatirg-trans/er in Stwm 100,000
Tofal Funding Sources - - - • 300,000
Capital F�cpendiWres
Design ' - - ' '
Right of Way - - - - -
ConsWciion 300,OOU
Total F�cpendiWres " - _ " - - 300,000
115
City ofAubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilitles Plan
SixYear Capital Facllities Plan,2016-2021 _Enterprise.Funds
ProjectTiue: West liill Springs Improvements
Projecf No: cp1417
ProjectType: Non-CapaCity
ProjectManager: LuiS Barba
Description: - - - -
Install flow confrol valve for automatic shutdown,replace meter,and upgrade resenroi�hatches. This project was Identlfied.
tlUring the DepartmeM of Health Sanitary Sunrey as a he8lth and safety concem.
2015 Comprehensive Plan GIP ID S-17
Progress Summary:
Design will begin in late 2015 wiUi construction completed in 2016.
Future lmpact on Operating Budget:
Nosigrrificant impact.
_ _-- - --
Aotivlly: - - -
2015 YE 2016 Year Entl
FundingSou�ces Prlorto3015 Estlmata .2016:Budget. ._20RBuApeL . _ProJectTotsl
UrnasMcledWa[erReoenue 511 50;000 �99,4&9� �-- -�-�---_- --�-- -�150;000�
Grants(Fed,State,lxal) - - - - -
PWTFL ' " - ' -
Bond Pioceeds 455,000 455,000
Totel Funding Sour�s�. � SN 50,000 556,C89 - 605,000
Cepital Expendipires�.
Deslgn 511 50,000 99,489 - 150,000
Right o/YVay ' ' - ' ' ,
Consfruction 455,000 455,000
Total.ExpenAlwres�. 511 50,000 55a,489 - 603,000
Forecasted Project.Cost:
Tofal
2016 2019 2020 2021 20762027
Funding Sourcos�.
UnrestticletlWefarRevanue - - - - gg,4gg
Grants(Fed,�Stete,Locsq - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - -
6ond Proceeds 455,000
Tofel Funding Sources. - - - - 554,489
Capltal ExpenAitures�
Design ' ' ' ' 99.489
Right of WaY ' ' _ ' ' .
ConsvucBon - 455,000
Toal Expentltwrex - - - - 554,q9g
116
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facillties Plan
Six Year Capkal Pacilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
Projectrue: Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation
Project No: cpXXXx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: TBD
Description:
Install seismic conVol valves on outlet piping of Resenrolrs 1,2,4A 48.Sq and 8B.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID R-OB
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget: - -� �
No significarrt impact
Activity.:
ZO15 YE 2016 Yeer End
Funtling Sourcea PAor to 2015 E9ima0a 2016 Budget 2017 BuCget Pro eot Totel
UrnesMcted Water Reosnue - - - - -
Grants Lnsecuretl Fetleral - - - - -
. . . PWTFL ' ' ' - '
Bontl Proceeds
Topl Funtling Sources: - - - • -
Capltal Fxpendidiras:
Design ' ' ' ' '
we�+r a ivey - - - - -
ConshuCtion
Total ExpentliWrex ' ' " ' .
Forecasted ProJect Cost: �
Total
2018 2019 2020 ._ 2021. . .20163021.
Funtling Sourcex �� ���� � � . -.. � . -. �
UnrestActetlWaterRevenue 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000
Grants-Unsecuietl Fetleral - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - -
Bond Proceeds
TctalFundingSources 357,500 357,500 -� - 715,000
Capital ExpenditureS
Deslgn 150,000 - - - 150,000
Right o/WaY - ' ' -� '
Consbuction 207,500 357:500 585.000
Total F�cpendiwrex - � - 357;500 357;500 - - 715,000
117
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilttles Plan
Soc Year Capital Facflities Plan,.2076-2027 Enterprise,Funds
ProjectTitle: Lea Hill - 132nd Ave Distribution System Modifications
ProjecYNo: CpXXXX
Project'rype: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
- - -- - - -- -
Descrtption:
Project will atltl:pressure reducing valves and coMrol vaMes at Lea Flill reservoirs and pump stations,and�sysiem valves to provide
efficierit operation of;Fie 132nd Ave Tacoma IMertie. ��
20]5 ComprehensNe W ater Plan CIP ID��D-06
P►ogress Summary:,
Design and construcOon will be completed in 2016.
Futurelmpaet on Operating Budget:
Nosignificant impact
Activity:
2015 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sourees Prior to 2015 Estlmate 2018�Budget 2017 Budget Project Tofal
Unrestncted Water Rersnue - - - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Locel) - • - - �-
PWTFL - - �- - -
Bond�Proceeds 75,000 325,OOU 75,000
Total Funding Sou�s � - - - " ��75;000�� � "�-325;000�- -�- - 75,000-
CaDital Fspenditures
� Qesign ' - 75.000 , 75.000
Right of Way ' ' ' ' '
Caisfiiction ' ' _ __ _. _ 325.000_...__ __ — .
Tofal ExpenCitures: - - 75,000 525,000 75,000�
� Foreoasted P�oJect Cost:�
rom�
2018 2019 2020 2021 2076-2021
Funding.Sources
Unrestnctetl Water Reeanue - - - - -
Gients(FeO,State,Local) - - - - -
PWTFL ' ' ' ' '
BaitlProceeds - - . _400.000-
, _ , _ _. __ . ___ ..._ .__. __ _
Total FunAing�Sources - - - - 400,000�
CaPital Ezpenditurea
. .. pesign ' ' ' ' 75,000
Ri9At o{Wey ' ' '. ' _
� Carshuct7on 325,000�
Total Expenditures ' ' ' ' 400.000-
118
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _
WATER FUND (430) C.apital Facllkies Plan
Six Year Capttal Facilkies Plan,201&2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTine: Auburn Way South - Muckleshoot Piaza to Dogwood
ProjectNo: cp1218
PrbjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjecfManager. Larson
Description:
Water main impro4ements cons4vcted in conjunction with Aubum Way South Cortidor hnprovemeMs.
2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-O6
Progress Summary:
Design will be completed in 2015 with consVuction completed in 2016.
FufureJmpaot on Operating Budgetc
No signficarrt impact
Activity:
2015 YE 2p16 Vear End
Funding Sourcas Ptlw to 2015 Estirtiate 2016 Budget_ 2077_BuOget. Projec[SMsI._
UnieslticletlWaterReosnue - 55.000 885.000 - � 940;000�
Grants(Fad,State;LocaQ - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - -
6ond Proceeds
Total Funding8ourcea - 55,000 885,000 �-� 940,000
Capltal F�cpenditurea
Design - 55,000 - - 55,000
Righf W�Way ' ' - ' '
Conshuction 88,5,000 685,000
Total F�cpenditures - 55,000 BB5,000 - 940,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Totnl
. 2018 2078 2020 2021 201&2021
FunAing sourcea . : .. - . . . . __ .
Unrestncted Water Revenue - - - - 885,000
Grants(Fed,State,LocaQ. - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - _
Bond Proceetls -
Tofal Funtling Sourcea - - � - - -� �- - �"-� 884,000
Capltal Expendlturex.
� �esign ' _. _ ' '
Right of Way ' ' ' ' -
Conshuction 8&5.000
Tolal F�cpendituras " " - ' .885�000
119
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
---_ — --- ==- - - _ -
WATER FWND (430) Capital Facilkles Plan
Six Year Capkal Facilities Plan;2016-2021 Enterphse Funds
ProjectTitle: Reservoir Painting
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjegtType: Non-Capacity
� ProjedMar�ger.� TBD
Description: - - - -
Maintenance of resenroirs requires periodic painting to protect the steel and increase the useful life of the reservoir.
2015 Comprehensive�Plan CIP ID R-05
Progress Summary:
Plarmed
Future Impaof on Operating BudgetE - �� - � - - ��� - -
No sigrrifiraM�impad
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourees Prior to 2075 E4imaoe 2018 Budget 2017 Budget ProJect Tofel
UnrestActed.WaterRe4enue - - - -
.Grants(Fed;State,Locef) - - - - -
PWTFL " ' ' _ '
BbndProceeds . - . _-.. . - -
. _ _ __._ _ - . ._.__ -
T�I FunAing Sources - - - �-� -
CepMgl 6cpendltures
Desl9n - ' - - - -
w�+r a wey - - - - -
' Conswcrron
Total FxpendlNiex ' ' ' ' '
. ___ . . _ _ _. . _ ._ _ ._ __. _. _ ____ . .
Forecasted P�oJecf Cost: "
Toml
2018 2019 2020 2021 Y018-2021
Funding Sources
UrvesvictedWaterRe�enue - - 12W:000 - 1,250,000
Grants(Fed;State,Local) - • - - -
PWTFL ' ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds
Total Funding Souicex - - 7.250,000 - 1,250,000
Capltal Expenditures
Design - - 150,000 - 150,000
R/ght of Way - - - - • �
CnnstrucNtin 1,100.000 1;�00.000
Total ExpenCllurex - - 1.250.000 - 1�.250.000
I2�
Gity ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectrUe: 24" YVhke River Crossing
Project No: CpXXXX
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD '
Description:
Ttre facilities evaluation study conduoted in 2D13-2014 founil a suspected leak on the 24"steel Vansmission main crossing the
W hite River. The appmwmate location was detertnined,but further investigation is required to assess the degree and magnkude of
the leak. This project will provide for full replacement of the river crossing.
2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-11
Progress Summary: - �
Design is aMicipated to be completed in 2016 with construction completed in 2017.
Future Impaet on Opereting Budget:�.
No significant impact
Ac4ivity: .
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 Estimate 2076 Budget 2017 Butlget Projeet Tofal
UrnasMcled.WaterRevanue - - - - -
. Grants(Fed,Sta[e,Locaq - - - - -
�WSRF - - _
Bond Pioceeds 450,000 -
Total Funding Sourees - - �"-� - - 450,000 .
Capltal 5cpenElGires
Design - - 100,000 -
Right o/WaY - ' - " '
Construction 350,000 -
Total F�cpenditurex - - - - 450.000 .
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
7oml
2018 2019 2020 2027 .2016-2021_
Funding Sourcex -- —
Unrestncted Water Revenue - - - -
Grants(Feo;State,Local) - - - - -
DWSRF - - - - _
Bond Pioceeds 850,000 .. 1,300,000.
Total Funtlirig Sourees 850,000 - - - 1,300,000�
Capital Expenditures:
Design ' - - - 100.000�
Right ol Way - - - - �
Consbuction 850.000 - 1,200,000
Tofal Expendi[urea � - 850,000� � - - - 1,300,000
I21
City of Auliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capka�eacilkles Plan
Siz Year Capkal Facilities Plan;2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements
Project No: cp1416
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. WCkSl70m
Description:
Water main imprrnementis construbted in conjunction with F Street SE sVeet improvements.
2015 Comprehensive�W aterPlan CIP ID'D-06
- ___-_..- . - - - - - � �-- - - - - -
Progress Summary:
Design will be Completed.in 2015 with consVuction completed in 2017..
Future linpact on Operating Budget:
No�significaM impact
Attijrity:�.
2015 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Sources Prior to 2075 E5lmate 2078 Budget 2017�Bud�t ProJeetTWal
UnresMcfed.WaterRe4enue - 100,000 250,000 100;000
Grants(Fed;Slafe,Loceq - - - -� -
._ . . .--PWTPL ' ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds
Total.Funding Sources: - 100,000 • 2SO,OW. 700,000
Capttal Eii{iendipirea
Desfgn - 100,000 - - t00,000
Rightof WaY ' ' - ' '
ConsWcNon 250.000
Total ExpendlWres - 100,000 - 250.000 100,000
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total
2078 2019. �2020___ . 2027.. . __ . 20162021__ .
FundingSource� _ . . _ _ __.__ - . . _. . _ ___ __ - _-. - ___.
UnresMcted Water Re�snue - - - - 250.000
Grants�(Fetl,State,l.ocal) - - - - -
PWTFL ' ' _ '. '
Bond Proceeds
Total Funding Sotirees: - - - 250,000
Ca p Ita I.E:pe n d i W_re s:�
Design - - - - -
RfgM o/Way - - - - -
CtinstnictJon 250.000
Tota1.F�[penAitures - �-� - - �250,000
122
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (43U) Capi�l Facllkies Plan
Siz Year Capital Facilkies Plae,2016-2021 Enterpr4se Funds
ProjectTUe: M Streef SE Storm Improvements
Project No: cp1511
ProjeaType; Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. La�sO�
Description:
Water main improvements consVucted in conjunotlon wtth M St SE�stortn antl sVeet improvements.
2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-O6
Progress Summary:
Design wiil be completed in 2015 with construction completed in 20'16.
Puture Impact on Opereting Budget:
� No sgnificant impact
Activity:
� 2015 YE 2016 Year Entl
Funding Sources .PAor to 2075� _ ERlmata . 2016 Budget 2017 BuCget ProjectTotal
UnresMctedWaterRevenua = ---- �-�50;000� �250,000 " _ - - � -��300;000-
Granfs(Fed,Sfate,Loca!) - - - - -
PWTFL - ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds
Total Funtling Sourcex - � 50,000 250,000 • 300,000
Capital Expentliwres:
Design - 50,000 - - 50,000
Right ol Way ' ' _ ' _
COIISI/UC�IOII 2$0,��_ - 2$�,�0�
Totel Fx{ienditures - 50,000 250,000 - 300,000
Foreca§ted ProJect Cost:
Total
2078 2019 2020 2021 20162021
Funtling Sources:
UnresMcteOWaterRe�snue - - - - 250,000
G2nts(FeO,State,LocaQ - - - - -
PWTFL ' ' _ ' '
Bond Proceeds - -
Total Funding Sources - • - • 250,000
Capltal Expendltures:
Design ' ' - ' -
Right ol Way ' ' ' ' '
Conshuction ,.250,000.
Total Erzpentliture� - - - - 250,000
123
City of Aubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_._- --
WATER FUND (430) CapitalFacilklesPlan
Six Year Capitat Facilities_'Plan,2016-2021 EMerprise Funds
ProjectTine: Reservoir Repair and Replacements
ProjectNo: CpXXXX
ProjectType: Non-CapaCity •
ProjectMariager TBD
Description:
General reserooir mairrtenance�and mirror improvemeMs.
2015 Comp�hensivePlan CIP ID R-03
. . _-- - -� - - - - - �- � - -- -- - - � � -
Progress Summary:
Plamied
FuWre Impact on Operating Budget:
No significam impact
- - ---- - - - -- . _. . . .--
Activity:
� 2015 YE .2016 Year End
Funding Sources ..PAor to�2015. ESUmaM 2016 Budget 2017 BUAget. _._ ProJeet TMaI
Unrestncfed Waler Revenue - - - - 50,000 -
Grants(FedState,Locel) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Fundine Sourcss:. - - - 50,000 _
CaPifal ExpendiSures�
. . . - -. .Oesign ' ' ' ' '
Right of.WaY ' ' ' ' ' .
ConsWction 50,000
Total EzpenClmrex�. ' ' ' S0.000 -
Forecasted P[oject.Cost:.
Tota I
2018 2019 2020._ _ .2021_ -_ _ .2018�2027
Funding Sourcex "- - - " " " - " - "- - � - � � �
UnrestrlctetlLVaterReYanue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other
TotelFunding�Sources -� - � 50,000� " "50;000 � - --W,000-- �� -�-�"50;000�" �- "- 250,000
Capitel Expeniliturea
� Desi9� - - �- - -�
Righ(of Way ' ' - - '
ConsVuction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250.000
Total ExpenClWrex. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 -- 250,000
124
City ofAuburn Draft CapitaFFacilities Plan
WATEF2 FUNU (430) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities PIan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: Pipeline Asset Management Sfudy
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Description:
Pipeline asset managemerrt studywih iderr6fythe remaining useful life of water mains in the system,prioritize pipe
repfacemeMs,and develop replacemert costs to phase in the replacements.
2015 Comprehensi�,�e Plan CIP ID D-10
Progress Summary:
Planned
Futu�e Impact on OperatingBudget:
IVo significarrt impact
. ... . . ._ _ _ _. . _ . ._
Activity: � - ----- -- � -
2075 YE 2016YearEntl
Pundfng Sources: Prlor to 2015 F�imate 2016 Butlget 2017 Budget ProJec[Total
UnresMcted Water Revenue - - - - � -
G2nfs(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -.
� Bond Proceeds - - - -
Ofhar
Total Funding Sources - " . _ .- - . - . - . . -. -
Capital Expandiltiies
Desi9n _ _ ' ' '
Right of Way - - - - '
COIIS�NC�l00 �
Tofal'ExpendiWres: - - - - -
Foreeasted Project Cost: � � �� - - � ��
Tofal
.2018 2019 2020 2021 20762021
Funding Sourcex
UnrestnctedWaterRewnue 50,000 - - - 50,000
. . .. . .. . . .... .._ .
Grants(Fetl,State,LwaQ - - - - �-
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
Other -
Tofal Funding Sources: 50,000 - - - 50,000
CapiTal.Expenditures:
Design 50,000 - - - 50;000
Right o/Way - - - - -
Construction . _. . _ __ . . _ _. _ ....- - - -
Total F�cpenditures: 50.000 - - - 50,000�
125
Ci.ty ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-3
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
WATER
Projed:_.-______- --- 2077 2018 2019 2020 -- --3021---- --2022' Total
1 Fu(mer weii Fidd .$ - $ - $ - $. - $. - $ - $ -
Improvements
2 CaseadelNaterAllianceWater
Purchase �
3 AeademyPump SYation pf
Replacemenf -
4 Coal Creek Springs
Rehabilitation -
5 fntertieBoosterPump'SYation
Impro"vements �
6 Algorta Well 1 -
Deiommis�onirig - - - - ' - .
7 AnnuafDi3ribution Sysfem
�Impiovemerits Program
8 GreanRivrrPumpStatlon _ _ 6D0 600 600 600 2;400
EmergeneyPBxer -
9 Welllnspectionand
�Redevdopmerif Program � �
70 WaterRepair d Replacemenf - - _ _ _ . _
11 MIT�MaSeiMeters - - - - - _
12 Street.UtilitylmprovemeMs - - - - ' ' '
13 Lea Hill PRVSfitlon
Improvements �
14 Wate/Meter88illing�Sy3em
Improvements � �
15 UtilitiesFielilOperations
Center ' ' � ' ' ' '
16 West HiII SpiingslmproJ�erit
17 ResErvolr Selanlc
Rehabll(tatlon � -
.. ._._...._ .
18 Lea�Hill-7J2ndAve.
Di3rlbutlon Sy9em ' ' ' ' ' ' '
hlodifcaBons
19 Ay6umWaySouth-�Dogxood
to Fir �
20 ReservoirPainting� - - - _ _ _ _
21 20"INhlteRi.verCrossnp • - - - - -. _
22 FStSENon-MotoNzeol
. _. _ . .. __._...._. _
lmprovements � � � �
�23 M�.St SE SYorm Imrprovements - - - - _ _ _
24 ReservoirRepairand
Raplaeements
25 PipelineAssetManaagemenf
Study. _ _ _ _ _ _. _
rorai s - s - s soo s soo g soo a soo s. z,aoo
126
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ _ _ ..
SANITARY SEWER
Cur�ent Facilkies
The City's sanitary sewer service are.a encompasses approximately 28-s.quare miles which are
primarily within the City limits, but includes a total of approximately Yz square mile within
Aubum's Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage
treatment and disposal. The City's Sanitary Sewer Utility is responsible for the collection and
transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines:
The City's cuRent inventory of approximately 197 miles of sewer lines serves the City's sewer
seryice area. Table S-1, Facilities Inventory, lists the sewage collection and transmission
facilities along with their capacities and locations.
Level of Service (LOS)
The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan for the Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level
of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City's sewage collection system. These standards
rep.resent 4he average quantities of sewage 4hat the system is designated to accommodate for
residential, industrial, and commercial deVelopment.
Capital Facilifies Projects and Financing
InVestments in the City's sewage collection facilities include primarily non-capacity
improvements and replacement projects. Anticipated replacements include replacement of
aging sewer pipes andmanholes in conjunction with arterial and local street improvements, and
replacement of pipe identified thiough the sewer program's condition as.sessment proc.ess. The
City will also undertake significant system assessment efforts including inspections and
evaluations of siphons, pump stations, large diameter pipe, and specific areas of the City that
shows high levels of inflow and infiltration. The City of Ati6um's sewer system anticipates coSts
for thirteen non-capacity projects totaling $12,751,000: Table S-2 shows the proposed financing
plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the six
years 2017—2022.
127 �
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plgn
TABLE S-1
Facilities Iriventory
Sewage Facilities
- - - . __ _ _
CAPAGITY _ ---- -- ----- _ _
FACILITY (MGD) LOCATION
Pump.Stations: _ _ . - --------_ _. - -
8fh Street 0.26 900 8th Street NE
22nd Streef 0.79 1950 22nd Street NE
Area 19 0.47 80071st Street SE
A. ubu�n 40 0.63 4159 O Place NE
_ _ _ _
Dogv�ood 0.43 1423 Dogwbod Street SE
Ellingson 2.20 100 41st Street SE
F Streef 0.86 1700 F Street SE
North Tapps 0.73 2610 Lake Tapps Pkwy SE
Feasley Ridge 0,36 5225 South 320th Street
R Street 0.14 600 R Street NE
RainierRidge 0.29 31809125thPlaceSE
Riverside 0.58 13900 104th A�enue SE
Terrace View 0.94 104 60th Street SE
_ _
Valley Meadoins 0.18 2022 4tli Street SE
Verdana 2.88 11807 SE 296fh Place (Kent, WA)
FACILITY Pipe Size; . LOCATION _
RiGer Crossings:
Iriverted Syphon 8 & 12 Inch Green Rirer & 26th Sfreet. NE
8th Street Bridge 14 inch Green Ri�er 8� 8tfi Street NE
128
City ofAuburn Draft CapitaZFacilities Plan
TABLE S-2
CAPiTAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
SANITARY SEWER DIVISION
zo+s 20» zo+s zo+s 2aio 202� raai
Capacitv Proleets: �
None
Non-Caoaeitv Proiects:
1 Sankary Sewer Repair&Replacemerrt Program
Capital Costs 1,540,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 5,440,000
Funtling�Souroes: �
SewerFund 1,540,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 5,4d0,000
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
2 Street U[Ility ImprovemerRs
Capifal CosLs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources: �
Sewer Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Bond Proceeds - - -
3 Vaetor DOeaM Feeility
Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 750;000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Fund 150,000 - - - - - �750,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
4 2015 Sewer Repairand Replacement
CapifalCosts 1,150,000 - - - - - 7;150,000
Funding Sources:
SewerFund 1,150,000 - - - - - 1,150,000
BonG Proceetls - - - - - -
5 Manhole Ring and Cover Replaeemerrt
Capital Costs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 60,000 80,000 480,000
Funding Sources:
�SewerFunC 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000
Bond Froceeds - - - - -
6 -Sewer Pump Station ReplaeemerHAmproyemeM
Capital Cosis - 14�,000 500,000 166,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000
Funding Sources:
SewerFund - 141,000 .500,000 168,000 900,000 147,000 1,850,000
eontl Proceeds -
7 �Siphon ASSesSmeM �
Capital Costs - 524,000 - - - - 524,000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Fund - 524,000 - - - - 524,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - . .
8 Pump Statlon Conditlon Assessment
Capital Costs 187,000 - - - - - 187,000
Funding Sources:
SewerFund 187.000 - - - - - �g�ppp
Bond Proceeds - - - _
9 Large Dlameter Pipe AssessmeM
Capital Cos45 - 400,000 - - - - 400,000
Funding Souroes:
SewerFund - 400,000 - - - - 400,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - _ _ �
129
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE S-2
2016 2017 2018 2079 2020 2021 �Tctal
Non-Capacilv Prolecfs:
10 Ii�fiow and IMikration Study
Capital CosS �- 135,000 135,000 135,000 1�35�,000 135;000 675,000
Fundirig Sources:
SewerFund - 135,000 135,000 735,000 135,000 135,000 675,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
1 T.Coio�pretiensive Sewer Plan Update �
Capital Costs - - - - 350,000 - 350,000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Fund - - - - 350,000 - 350,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
12 FSfreet�$ENorfMotoraedlmprovemeMs
Capital Cosis 12,000 88,000 - - - - 700,000
Funding Sources:
SewerFund 72,000 88,000 - - - - 100,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
13 MSt�eet�SEStorm.lmpro4emerrts
CapitafCosts 245,000 - - - - - 245,000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Fund 245,000 - - - - - 245�,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
Su6total.Non-CapacityProiects:
CapitalCosts- � 3,564,000 1,868,000 2,415,000 883,000 .3,1BS,000 656,000 12,757,000
SUMMARY: '
CAPfiAL COSTS
CapaciryProjects - - - - - - -
Non-CapacityProjects 3,564;000 1,866,000 2,415,000 883�,000 3,165,000 856,000 12,751,000
Total CoSCs 3,564,000 1,668,000 2,475,000 863,000 3,165,000 856,000 �1.2,751,000
Fl1NUING SOUFtCES: � �
Util'ityFunds(Sewer) 3;564,000. 1,868,000 2;415,000 883,000 3,165,000 856,000 7.2,751,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other - - - - -
Total Funding 3,564,000 7,868,000 2,415,000 883,000 �3,165,000 656,000 72,757,000
130
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - — - _
$EW ER FUND (431) Capltal Facilities Plan
Slx Year Capltal Facilities Plan,2018-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: Sanitary Sewer Repair 8 ReplacemenUSystem Improvements Program
Projec4No: sebd07
ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement)
ProjectMareger. ElWell
Description:
Repair and replace broken seuver mains and other facilitles. These liries will b�e ideMified through television inspection:and
rou6ne cleaning. This particular progrem includes proposed projects-which do not have�an approved Project Management
Plan,or afe not associated with the SOS or other transportation improvemerrts. Anticipated projects include bi-annual,
stand-alone,repair anC replacement projects for sewer lines which are broken,misaligned,�"bellied"or otheiwise require
an inordinate amouM of mairrtererxe effort or preserrt a risk of backup or trench failure,and facilities which gene2te
consisterrt odor complaiMs. Additionally,system improvemerds which enFgnce the ability to maiMain service are included
here. Comp Plan ID#1.
Prog�ess Suriimary:
Anticipated projects for 2016-2021 include biennial repair and replacement projects.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This should decrease the operating budget by correcting the problems that require operation stafPs�attention.
Activity:. . . - ..
(Pretious 2 Vrs.) 2015 YE 2076 Yeer End
. Funding Sources: . Prior to 2015. Estimam. 2016 Bud et 2017 Budget Projeet Tofal �
UrnesfdcledSeMerRevenue � � �� 1,665,000"� � - -�255;000- -�--- 7�;540;000 - 300,000 3,460,000
Grants(Fea',State,Local) - - _ _ _
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
aner
Total Funding Sotircea 1,665,000 255,000 7.540.000 300,000 3,460,000�
Capital Fspanditurea
Design 249,750 38,250 231,000 45,000 519,000
R/ghf of Wey - - - _ _
Constructlon 1,415,250 276,750. 1,309,000� 255,OW 2,941,000
Total Expenditures 1,665,000 255,000 1,540,000 500,000 3,460,000
Forecaste.d Project Cost:
Total
2078 2079 2020 .2021 .201fr2027
Funding Sources '�- - --
UnresMctedSewerRevanue 1;500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 5,440,000
_. . _ . . _ . .. . .
Grents(Fed,Sfate,Loceq - - - - _
Bond Proceeds - - - - _
Other
Total Funding Sources 7,500,000 300,000 7,500,000 300,000 5,440,000
CaPifal EzpendiWres:
Design 225.000 45,000 225,000 45.000 816,000
� Right d Way ' ' ' ' '
ConsWction 1;275,000 .255,000 1,275,000 255,000 4,624,000
Total.Ezpendltures 1,500,000 '300,000 7,500,000 300,000 5,440,000
131
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) CapkalFacili4ies'Plan
Six Year CapitalFacitkies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
Projectrtie: Street Ufiliry Improvements
Projeot No: sebd02
ProjectType: Non Capacity (Repair and Replacement)
Projecttvtaroger. TBD
Description:
Sewer Iine�replacemeM in coordination with the Save�our Streets(SOS)program and Arterial improvemerds.
Comp Plan ID#2.
Progress Summary:
Ongoing
Future Impad on Opereting Budget:
No significant Impact
Activltji:
(PreNous 2 Vrs.) 2075 YE 2018�Year End�
Funtling Sources: Prlor to 2015 Fstlmate 2078 Budget 2017 Budget ProJect Tofal
UnresMcfetl.Se�+erReienue 400.000 200,000 200,000� 200,000 - 1.000,000
Grants(Fed,State,Locaf) - - - - -
Bond.Prnceeds - - - - -
Other
Total FunCing Sourcex 400,000 '2W;000 200,000 200;000 7�,000,000-
Ca'Plfal EttpenEipirec
Design 60,000 30;000 20,000 20,000 130,000 ,
Rigfit a/WaY ' ' ' ' '
� Constluction 340,000 170,000 _ 180,OW___ 180.000 . __690,000:
_ _
TotalExpenditures - 400,000- 200;000- 200,000- �200,000 -800,000' '
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total ,
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162021
Funding Sources
UnresMcfedSeKerRewnua 200,000 200,000 200.000 �200.000 1.200,000
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - • -
Bond Pioceeds - - - • -
Otlre�
TWaI Funding Sourees � � - -200;000" 200;000 -� �200,000" - � �Z00,000 �- �� -� -Y,Z00,000�
CaPHaI Expendidirex
Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000
Right o/Wey - -
Consfructfon 180,000 180,000 180,000 18U,000 1,080,000
Total Fxpendittire3: 200,000 200,000 200,000 200D00 1,200.OU0
132
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_
SE.W ER FUND (431) Capital Faailities Plan
Siz Year CapitalFacilities Plan;2015-2020 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Sewer Vactor Decant Facility
Project No: sebd03
ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Improvements)
ProjectManager: TBD
Description:
CurreMy the City hauls vactored sewage waste to the Counly landfill on a biweekly basis.The sewage
sludge is considerablywet,thus Cityfunds are.paying forthe disposal ofwater.This projectconsists ofa stutly/arralysis to
assess the.Citys vactor disposal.method and identiTy a cost�ffectiye�altematiJe to the sTatus quo. Possible
recommendations mayinclude maintaining currerrtoperations,constructing a gravitydecarr[
facility, incorporating special equipment iMo the vactor truck to increase decan6ng ability,or purchasing
specialized dewatering machinery. Comp Plan ID#3
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This project�could decrease ttie future operating budget by reducing the e�enses associated with.haulirig saturated�waste
to the CourNy landfill.
Activity: . . - . ....-�- --. .
2015 YE� 2015Year End
Funtling Sources: Prior to 20'IS Esdmate 2016 Butlget 2077 Butlget Projec[Total
UmestncfedSeNerRevanue - - 150,000 - 150,000
Grants(Fed,State,Loca/) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Funtling Sources:� - � � = 150;000� ' - � ��" "-150,000
Capifal ExpendiWres
Design - - 150,000 - 150,000
Righto)Way/PropertyAcquis/tion - - - - -
COOsfNCtiOl1 -
Tofal 6cpe.nAitures - . . -" - 150,000. . . " .-"- --" -� - 150,000�
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
7ofa1
2018 2019 2020 2021 .20162021
Funding.Sources
Unrestncted SeKer Revenue - - - - 150,000
Granis(Fetl,State,Local) - - - - � -
' Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources - - - - 750,000
Capital EzpendiNrex
Design � - - - - 150,000
Right.ofWay/PropertyAcquisition� - - - - -
Construction - -
TotalEzpendilures: - ' �. _ ._ .____ -.___._ _ . . _. _� . . .750�000�
133
Giry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - -- - --- _
SEWER FUND (431) CapitalFacilWes Plan
�Six Year C.apital Facilities�Plan,2016-2021 _ ___Enterprise_F.unds.
ProjectTitle: 2015Sewe� Repairand Replacement
ProjectNo: cp1512
Project7ype; Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement)
Projeat.Manager. Kim Truong � ��
- - - -
Description:�
This project consists:of tlie replacement of aging or problematic sewer lines at nine differeM sites ihtouqhout tlie City.
Erogress Summary::
--- -- - -
The'project is currently in the preliminarydesign phase arxi is scheduled to be consVucted in 2016.
.
_ __._ .�_.._ ._... ----
F.uture,imPacfon Operatirig 6udget::
Thisproject could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the numberof sewer lines.that iequire.frequent
maintereru:e.staff attention.
Activity:
� 2015 YE 2076 Vear End
Fuutling5tiurces:� PHorto.2015 .Estimate. 2016Butlget �2077�Budget Projec[Tofal
.UnresMctedSeNerRevenue - " "---- -�� " —�"150;000-" �---1;150;000'-- - � - 1,300,000"
Grents(FeQState,LOCaI) - - - - -
8ontl Proceetls - - ' - - -
Other
. . . _ __--_ . _ ____—_ _ ___.______-_-
Totaf Funtling Sourcex - 150,000 � 1,150,000 - 1,300,000�.
Capifel�ExPenditures: "
Desrgn - 150,000 - - 150,000�,
R/gM o/Wey/Property Acquisiiion - - - - - �
consn�,caon - - t,�w.000_ __-- _--- - -�.iso.000.
Tofal Eipenditires:� - 150,000 7,750,000 - 1,300,000�
� Forecasted BrojecfCost:�- � - -�-- - � �--� - � �---��-� �� -
Total
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162021
Punding Sources:
Unrestncted SeKerRevenue - - - - 1,150,000�
Giants(Fed,State,localj - - - - -.
Bond Froceeds - - - - -
OtFrer -
Tofal.Funding Sources. _ -. . - . _ . . . . ._. . ._ ._.__. _____-1.150.000�
CaPital ExPenditures:
Design - - - - -
RigM of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - -
Constiuc{ion 1,q50,0001
7ofafErzpenAiwres:� ' ' ' ' 1.750.000�
134
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
$EWER FUND (431) Capital Faciirties Plan
Six Year Capkal Facillties Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: Manhole Ring and Cover Replacement
ProjectNo: sebd04
ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement)
ProjectMariager. TBD
Deso�ipdon:
As manholes and roads age and iheir condition deteriorates,access coyers and the rings in which they sit can become
loose and/or misonerded,and can tiecome a road hazard requiring mairrtenance staff attention and inoreasing itie Gilys
liability. This annual projectwill replace approbmately 50 sewer manFwle rings and coeers to maintain accessto the sewer
system and W decrease the�ikelihood oflhe manholes becoming road hazards. Some of these replacements may be in
wnjunc6on with other City capital projects.
Comp PIan.ID#7.
Progress Suminary::
Future Irtipact on Operatlng Budget:
This project could decrease the fuhrre operating budget by reducirg the need for staff to respond to loose manholes or lids.
Aetivity:
2015 YE 2076 Year Entl
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 Estimate 2018 Bud et 2077 Butlget Project Total
Unrestnctetl Seiier Revenue - - 80,000 80,000 80,000
Grents(Fed,State.LocaQ - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Tmal Funding Sources: - . 80,000 80,000 80,000.
Capltal Ezpendiares
Des/gn - - 5,000 5,000 5,000
� R/9hto/Wey/PropertyAcquisition - -
Constmction 75,000 75,000 75,000
Totnl Expandilures - - 80,000 80,000 80,000
Foreeastad Projeet Cost:
rmai
2018 2078 2020 202t_ 20162027
Funtling Sources
UnresMcfed Sexer Rewnue 80,000 80,000 00,000 80,000 480,000
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
Ofher ._ __. .._r-. '
. _ ' _ . '_'. ' . _'. _ ' _-_
Total Funding Sources 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000
Capfml ExpenCiWres
Design 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
R1gA�o/Wey/PmpertyAcQuisition ' ' ' ' '
Construction 75,000 751000 75,OOb 75,000 450,000�
Total ExpendiWrex 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000'
135
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities PZan
--- ---- —
SEW ER FUND (431) Capifal Facilitfes Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities PIan,1076-2021 Ente�prise Funds
ProjactTitle: Sewer Pump.Station Replacement/Improvement
ProjectNo: cpX)CXic �
ProjectType: Non-Capacity(Repair and ReplacemenUlmprovemenfs)
ProjectManager. TBU
_ __ _ _ -- _ _ _
Description:
THree sewer pump shations,the 8th StreetPump STation,Valiey Meadows Pump Statlon,and 22nd S7eet Pump3tation
have been idendfied as needirg renovation;replacement,and/or relocation based on condition,safety concems,and to
accommodate growth.The scope of these improvemerits has not yet been developed,but will be based on ihe Pump
Station Condition Assessmerit projectscheduled for 2016. Rehabilitation costs forthe 3 pump sTations haoe been
estimated over a 6-year period.(design one year,construct followi.ng year).
Comp PlanlD#4.
__ . . .- - -- -� ---- --- - -
Progress Summary:
Following the resulis of the systematic piunp station evaluation study scheduled for 2016;the sequence or
iden6fication of pump stations requirirg RBR,and detailed scope of improvements(one pump staUon rehabilitated every
other yeaP).for each of these sta6ons will be de}eloped.
-- -- -- ---- - -- -
Future Impact on Operatlng Budget:
This project will not ha�e a-sigruficaM effect on ope2tirg b�get
ActiJky:
2015 YE �2078 Year Entl
Funding Sources� Prlor to 2075 E4lmate 3018 Budgat 2077 Budgai Project3oTal
UnrestActetl Setier Reirenue - - - 141,000 -
cranrs(Fed,sfare,l.oce+) - �-� - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Othef
Total Funtling Sources' _ - = 147,000 -
Capital Fxpendltures
� Design ' ' ' 141,000 -
Rlghto/Way/ProperryAc4uisifion ' ' ' - '
COlIS�NCiiO/1
romi.ezoenaip,re.s - - - : - ��aL000---- - � _
. _ . .. .._ _ .. __ . . _
Forecasted Project Cost:
rmai
2078 2019- - -2020_ . _ _ 2021 _ _2016-2021. _
FuntlingSou�s . . . _ .. . _. ._____ _ ___- _
Umestr/cted Seuer Re�.enue 500,000 168,000 900.000 141,000 1,850,000
Granfs(Fe4State;LocaQ. - - - -� -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other -
TWalFundtngSources " �500:000 168.000- � " --�900:000�--�—�---141:000;.. _.". .1;850.000
Capltai F�cpendiWisa
Pesign 20;000 168,000 50,000 141,000 520,000
Right of Way/Property Acquisition . . . . . . . ...-
Conshucfion� 480�,000 8W,000 1,330,000
Totel Ezpanditures 500,000 768,000 800,000 141,000 7�,850,000
136
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) CapitalFaeilitiesPlan
Six Year Capkal Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Siphon Assessment
ProjectNo: CpXXXX
Projectrype: Non-Gapacity (Improvement)
ProjectManager: TBD
Description:.
Currently,the City does not hans the required eq0ipment to complete inspectiore of the three sewer siphors(2 across the
Green River, 1 under the 2ilroad tracks at H and 6th NW)located�within its collection system.Their cordition is unkrrown.
This project would inspect each siphon to detertnine iLs condition and help set fu[ure�inspectiordcleaning protocols.The
siphons would be inspected pnor to cleanirig to detertnine:what thei�in situ oondition is,then if�equired the lines would be
clearred and re-inspeated. Based on the debris Ievei and condition of the pipes,firture activi6es can be planned. Comp
Plan ID#5.
Progress Summary:�
Future ImpaM on Operering Budget:�
This projectwill not ha�,e a significaM efrect on operating budget.
Activity:
2075 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcex Prlor to 2015 FSimate ]At6 Bud9at 2017 Budget Project Tofal
UniesMctetl Seiier Rei�snue - - - 524,000 -
Grants(FedStare,Locap - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Dther
Total Funding Sources - - - 524,000 -
Caplfel Expenditures
Design - - - 50,000 -
Rlght oi Way/PmP�y Acpuisition " " ' -
ConSWCtion 474,000
Tofal ExpenCfturex - - . �524,000 -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tota I
2018 2079 2020 2027 20'162027
Funding Sourcex " "- - " -� ���"- -
UnresMcted Seuer ReHenue - - - - 524,000
G2nts(Fed,State,Loca/) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other -
TotalFundingSources - = - - - 524,000�
Capital Expenditurex
Design - - - - 50,000
Rlght o/Way/Property Acquisifion - - - - -
ConStNCNOn 474,000
Total Expendidifes - - - - 526,000
137
City of AuUuriz Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - - -
-- - -
SEWER FUND(431) Gaprta�Faci�ities P�an
Siz Year Capkal Faeilities Plan;2016-2021 Enterprise.Funds
ProjectTitle: Pump Stafion Gondition Assessment
Project No: sebd05
Project7ype: Non-Capacity (Improvement)
ProjectManager. TBD
Description:
The assessmeM will evaluate the physical�condition of epsting sewage pump stations and equipmerrt.'flie
purpose offhe assessmeMis to p2dictfuture serviceabiliiyand anGcipated longevityfordevelopmen4of
fulure CIPs and the Citys asset management program. This assessment wilLalso be used to turther define the scape of
the Pump Station Replacemerif/Impro�.emefrt project. ��
Comp Plan ID#6.
_
Progresa SummaryE -
_
. Future Impact on Operatlng BuGget:
This project will not have a significarrt eTfect on operating budget
--- — - - _ _
Activky: - - -
2018 YE �2078 Yeai Entl
Funding Sourcex Prior l0 2015 E9lmate .20�6 Butl et 2077.Bud 4 Pro ectTofal
UnrestncfedSexeiRewnue� - " " - _ - �—�"-187;000--"�-�...-----_---- -� -- 187.000
G�ants(Fed,Stete,Loce/) - - • - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sourees: - �- 187,000 -� 187,000
CaPital ExpendiNrea
Daslgn - • 167,000 - '187�.000
Righto(.Wey/PmpertyAcquisition - - . - -
.. QOOSI/ULNOO
� _ _..__ _ ..___._.. ___.______ __ _.. .n ..
Total Fxpenditurea - - 187,000 - 187,000
. .. . . __ ..._.._ .. . _ . .
Forecasted ProJect Cqst:
Topl
2018 .2019 2020 2021 2018-2021
Funding Sources
UrvestdctedSeMerRevenue - - • - �87�,000
Giants(Fed,Stete,Loca!) - - - - .-
Bond Pioceeds - ' ' ' '
Other
Totel Fundfng 3our�ex - - - - - - = 187.000�
CaPital Eiipendlturex
Oesign - - - - '187,000
Right o(Wey/PropertyAcquisition ' ' ' ' '
Construction
TOfel Fx�pendiWiea - - - - �87,000
138
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) Gapkal Facilitfes Plan
Six Year Capkal.Faeilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
arojectTtle: Large Diameter Pipe Assessment
Project nlo: epxxxx
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity (Improvement)
ProjectMarmger. TBD
Descrip;ion•
City stafr is not equipped to efficierMy clean ard inspect sewer pipes with a diameter larger than 18 inches. This project
would clean and intemaly irupect ail pipe owned bytlie Citytliat is largecthan 18 inches in
diameter.This is approitimately 39,300 feet,rangirg in diameter from 20 iriches up to 36 incFies.
_.
Comp Plan ID#8.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This projectwill not have a significaM effect on operating Liudget.
Activity: _ _. . . . -
2075 VE 2076�Year Entl
' FundingSources Prforin2015 E4lmafe 2016Budget 2017Budget ProJectTotel
UnresMcted SeKer Revanue - - - 400,000 -
Grants(Fed,Slate,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - ' - '
Ofhei
Total Funding Souroes - - - 400,000� � -
Capltal ExpendlNres
Design - - - 10.000 -
RiBht olWey/PropertyAcpuisit/on - " ' ' '
� Conshuction - 390,000
TotalExpentliWres ' - ' " _ " -� _ - � - 100,000'- - -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2078 2019 2020 2021 201&2021
Funtling Sources
Unresfncted SeHer Revenue - - - - 400,000
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
Bontl Proceetls - - - - -
Other
Tofel Funding Sourtes -� - - - 400,000
Capltal Expenditums:
Design - - - - 10,000
Righto/Way/PropertyAcquisitfon - - - - -
ConsMuctron - - 390,000
TotalExpendlNrea - . . -- . .. - ._ - 400.000
139
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SEW ER FUND (431) Capkal Facilkies Plan
SixYear.Capkal Faeilitles Plan,2016-2021 Enterpdse Funds
Projectrtle: Inflow and Infiltration Study
Project No:� cpxxxx
ProjecfType: Non,Capacity (Improvement)
ProjectMareger. TBD
Descrlptton;
This project would assess portions of the City Sewer Service Area assess irfiltratio�rdiow(UI)values,since excessive
localized YI can also be an indicator of poor sewer main and side sewer condition and coWd coMribute to capacity issues
in tlie tuhire. l7us project yiioultl monitor flow in the.00lleation system o�er 5-years.These data will then be used to help
identity repair and replacemerrt rieeds and for modeling piuposes and VI assessmerrt in fuWre updates to Uie
Comp2hensioe Sewer Plan. Comp Plan ID#9.
Progress Summary:
- - - — - -- -
Future ImpacYon Operating�Budget:
This projectwill not have a sigNficaM effect on operating budget.
Ao(iyityh - -
2015 YE. 2018 Year End
Funding��9ourcea Prlorto2075 Estimate �2076Budget.. 2077BuCgeL—.Projeet7olal .
UnresMcted SeKer Revenue - - - 135,000� " -
Grents(Fetl,State;LocaQ ' ' ' - '
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Tofal Funtling Sources - - - 135,000 -
Caplfal 6cpenditurea
Design ' ' ' 40.000 -
Po'ght of Wey/Pioperty AcqulSlflon - - - - -
CO/ISINClIM �,OOO
Total Expendltuies ' ' ' 135.000 - .
Forecasted P�ojecfCost: -
Tofel
2016 2079 :2020 202� 20'162021
Funding Souree�
UnrestrtctedSeKerRewnue '135,OD0 135,000 135,000 135,000 675,000
Grenfs(Fed.Stete.Loca!) - . - -. . .. ' '
Bond Proceeds - - - .
Other -
Tofal Eundfnp�Sourcas 135,000 735,000 � 135,000 13i,000� 6�5,000
Caplfal FiipendlWrea
�� Design' 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Rlgdt of Wey/Property ACqu/5/fion - - - -
Consbuction 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000
Total Fxpendlturea 135,000 135,000 �135,000 736,000 875,000
140
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _
SEW ER FUND (431) Capital Facilkies Plan
SixYear Capital Faeil'rties Plan,2016-2027 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitie: Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update
ProjectNo: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvement)
ProjectManager. TBD
Description:
Prepare an update the Citys Sewer Comprehensiee Plan to include an update to tlie Frydraulic model anH an�date to the
Capital trnprovement Plan.
Comp Plan ID#10.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on OpereHng Budget:�.
This projectwill rrot have a sigrrificant effect on operating budget.
/►ctivity:
2075 YE� 2016 Year Entl
Funding Sources PAor to 2075 E91maDe 2016 Budgat 2077 Budget Pro)ect Tofal
UnresMcred.SewerReJenue - - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Lwal) - - - - -
6ond Proceeds ' ' ' - '
Other
Total Funding Sources - - - - -
Ca�pipl Ezpenilltures
Design - - - - -
Right of Way/Property Atquisition - - - - �
QOlI51NCtion -
Total Expentlitures • ' ' .
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 2019__ _ _ 1020 2021. _ 20162027
Funding Sourees -. — . . . --� -
UnresMctedSenerRevenue - - 350,000 - 350,000
Grents(Fed,State,LocaQ - - _ _ _
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other -
Total Funding Sourcea - � - 350,000 - �350,000
Capifnl ExPendiWrex
Design - - 350,000 - 350,000
Righf of Way/PiopeRy Acquisition - _ _ _ - .
Constructian -
Total EzpendiWrax ��- - �- = - 350.000 - �350,000
141
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- _ _ _- - — - --- -
SEWER FUND (431) caP�rai Faciirties eia�
Siz Year Capital Facilfties Plan;2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjeocTiUe: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improyements
Projeot No: cp141,6
ProjectType: No�-Capacity (Repair and Replacement)
P(ojectManager. S6th wCk3trOm
Dascription:
Replaoe appro�amatety 420 LF of 15"-18"diameter clay pipe as part of the F Street SE Non-Motori�d trnprovemerRs
project Constructing this project in association with a road improvemerrt project saves money arxl awids damage to 1he
new roadway that could occur if the�pipe was not replaced and e�erienced a failure or blockage.
Progress'Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project wih rrot haves significaM efrect on operating budget.
Acti4ity:
2015 YE 7A76 Year End
.. . ... .. _. __..
FundingSources Prlwto2015 E�mate 2016�Budget 2077 ProjeetTotal
UnrtrosMctedSeiterRe>snue - t2.000 �12,000 88,000 24,000�
Grants�(Fed,Stafe,LoceQ - - - - -
Bond Pioceetls - - - - -
Other
Tofal�Funding Soureos � - 72:000 ' - �72,000" � - � 88;000 - - 24;000�
Caplfal EzpenAlturee
� Design - 12,000 12,000 - 24,OW�
RrgMo/Way/PiopeRyAcOuislflon - - - - -
C.OnSINCi%OII - .�,�� _ -
ro�i�ae�aiw�� - �z;000 �z,000 ee;000 sa000
Forecasted Project Costi
Total
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162027
Funding Sourcea
Unrestncted Seiaer Reirenue - - - - 100,000
cranrs.(Fed,srare,Locall • - - - -
Bond Pmceeds - - - . -
OthBf - -
TolnfFundingSoumes - - - - 700,000�
Capltal Fxpantllturez
Design - - - - 12:000. _
RightofWay/Prope�TyAcquisition - - - - -
Conshuction 88,000
Toal.Eapendiwrex ' " ' ' 700.000
142
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) cap��Fa�uities P�an
� .SUc Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: M Street SE Storm Improvements
Project No: Cp1511
Projectrype: Non-Capacity (Repair and Repiacement/lmprovement)
Project Meroger. Matt Larson
De§c�iptlon:
Replace appropmately 800 LF of aging sewer pipe with root intrvsion issues with new 8" PVC in conjunction with storrn
and road improuemerits. ConsVucqng this projeqt in association with a road improoement project saves moriey antl awids
damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and e�erienced a failOre or blockage.
Progress Su'mmary:
The'road and stortn project is currently in a preliminarydesign phase. Design is anticipated in 2015 with project
consWcbon in 2016.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This.projed will not have a significaM effect on operating budget.
Aetiyityc � . . . . .. _ .. __ .
.2015 VE. 2078 Vear End
Fundin9 Sources: Prlor to 2075 Estlmete 2016 Budget 2077 .P,roject Totsl _.
UnresMctetlSeiaerRevanue - 35,000 245,000 - �280;000
cianrs(Fed;srere,t.ocaq - - - - -
� Bontl Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Other
Total Funtling Sources - 35,000 245,000 - 280,000
Capital ExpenCiWres
Oesign - 35,000 7,000 - 42,000
Right o/Wey/PropMyAequisition - ' - ' '
Conshucfion 238,000 238,000
Total Expendiwrex . - 35.000 245,000 - 280,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
7otal
2018 2019 7A20 2027 �2018-2021
Funtlin9 Sou[ces � � � �
UnrestnctedSekerRevanue - - - - 245,000
Grants(Fetl,State,Locaq - - - . -
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
OtFrer -
Total Funding Sources - � _ - - - - .245,000
CaPlfal ErzPendiWres
Design ' ' ' - 7,000
R/gAto(Way/PropertyAcquisition - - _ _ _�
Construction 238.000
Total Expendiwres - - - - 245,000
143
City ofAuburn Draft Cgpital Facilities Plan
� �
CITY OF _ �
� -
� � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
��
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE
Current Facilities
The City's sto.rm drainage service area encompasses the municipal boundaries of the City. For
management purposes the service area is divided into 60 drainage sub-basins. The City's
drainage sysfem consists of a combinafion of clo.sed conveyance pipes and open ditch
conVeyance facilities, with six pumping stations. Table 3D-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities
along with their current capacities and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The Citys Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design
criteria, for the City's storm drainage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25-
year724-hour design storm capacity within the 60 drainage sub-basins.
Capital Facilities Proje.cts and Financing
The City's storm drainage facilities antic.ipates two capacity projects in the amount of $631,000
and 16 non-capacity projects totaling $17,054,618 for a six-year planning expectation total of
$17,685,618. Table SD-2 shows the proposed fnancing plan followed by individual worksheets
showing the project detail..
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for storm drainage facilities during the six
years 2017—2022.
145
City ofAuburn Draft Cap" ital Facilities Plan
TABLE S0.1
Facilities Inyentory
Storm Drainage Facilities
CAPACITY
Feet of Feet.of
FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION
Drarnage
Basins:
A 562 54,135 �,643 SeeCityofAubum's �
I
AA 408 33,726 18;063 Comprehenslve Drainage
AAA 296 1,843 8,697 Plan, Dec. 2015
AZ 777 76,451 28;779
B 864 116,476 2,735
BB 15 1,658 0
BBB 73 0 0
C 836 92,545 5,366
CC 242 1,456 0
CCC 981 71.127 27;523 �
D 168 21,057 177 j
DD 231 1,819 0
DDD 61 3,981 0
E 692 71,787 23,674
EE 800 4,294 0
F 83 10,124 0
FF 411 3,589 896
G 137 20,038 0
GG 190 4,745 3,138
N 559 58,645 5,468
HH 392 0 0
FIV 66 12:172 0
I 241 39,379 7,152
II 305 0 0
J 257 20,967 2,101
JJ 1,170 32,742 17,192
K 266 25,800 2,574
KK 391 0 0
L 87 19,642 4,164
LL 198 35 1,567
LS 1;139 100,817 0
M 553 45,070 12,186
MM 332 1,779 1,204
N 126 9,815 0
NN 588 42,857 913
NNN 175 5,028 1,165
O 176 25,674 3,639
00 1,397 37,359 27,978
P 189 28,363 5,312
PP 110 1;321 0
PPP 161 2,869 5,637
QQ 334 13,415 4,845
146
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-1 (continued)
Facilities Inventory
Storm Drainage Facilities
CAPACITY - — �i
Feet of Feet of
FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION
- R 55 7,166 0
RR 249 11,679 4,944
S 273 13,730 2;236
SS 333 20,279 6,065
T 698 131,794 4,089
Tf 135 12,041 131
U 365 26,439 557
UU 453 14,680 3,711
V 598 35,715 10,059
W 287 33,935 3,153
WC 65 7,8.95 0
WW 71 96$ 548
X 40 3,616 0
YY 327 19,0.88 7,284
YYY 105 15 0
Z 70 9,678 0
ZZ 945 54,048 39,862
ZZZ 237 0 0
Total 22,145 1,517,304 306,427
FACIUTY (GPM) LOCATION
Pum 'Statioris:
White Riyer Pump Station 17,700 5000 block A Street SE
A Street SE Pump Station 1,380 A Stree4 SE near SR-18 and
BNRR o�erpass
Aubum Way S Pump Station#3 1,000 Aubum Way S near SR-18
and BNRR oeerpass
Brannan Park Pump Station#4 20;200 Brannan Park
Emerald Corp. Park Pump Station 6,500 C Street NE near42nd Street
West M_ain_Street Pump_Station 1,200 1420 West Main Street
147
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan I
TABLE SD-2
- . _ . _ _ . _
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
STORM DRAINAGE DIVISION
2076 2017� 2018 2019 2020 2021 _ Total
Caoackv.Proieets: � .
� MStreet$EStorm.imprm�e_meM
Capihal CosLs 340,000 - - - - . 340,000
Funtling Sources:
StormFund 340,000 - - - - - 340,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
2 37th St.NW'Storm ImprovameM
CapitalGosts 40,000 251,000 - - - - 291,000
Funding Sources:
S�rtn�.Fund 40,000 251,000 - - - - . 287,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
SuMotal,CacacitvProiects:
CapiNal Coals 380,000 257,000 - - . . 631,000
Non-Capaeitv ProJects:
3 Pipeline Repair&Replaeement Program
Capifal Costs 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1�,000,000 �3;300,000
Funtling�Sourees:
Storm Fund ��00,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,00O,OOD 3,300A00
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
4 30tb Street NEArea Fiooding,Phase 2
Capital CosLs - 896,000 - - -� - 896,000
Funding_Sources:
Storm Funtl � - 896,000 - - - . 896,000
Bond Proceeds.. ._ .__ - - - - - - -
5 30th Street NEArea Fiooding,Phase 3
Capi}a1CosLs - - 200,000 1,924,000 - - �2.124.000
Funding Sources;
Storm'Fund - - 200,000 1,924,000 - - 2,724,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
6 WestMainStreeEPump5tatlonUp9rade
Capital Cosls - - - - 300,000 �2,688;000 �2,968,000
Funding Souroes: '
. . . . . .. _. . __ .
Storm•Fund - - - - 300,000 �2,668,000 -2,968,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
7 StreetUtilitytmprrneme'Ms
Capital�Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1D0,000 100,000 ¢OO,OOD
Funding�Sources:
Storm Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 �100,000 100,000 600,000
BonC Proceeds - - - - -
-------- - _.. .. _
8 Comprehe_nsiye Storm:Drainaga Plen Update
Gapital Costs - - - - 300,000 - 300,000
Funding Sources:�
SUortn Fund - - - - 300,000 - 300,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -�
TABLE SD-2
148
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
2018 2017 2016 2019 2020,. _ . ..2021 ___�Total
. ._ . . ---- -. . . .-- - _. _ .. _. _ .
Non-CapaciN Proiects:
9 Mill Creek Wefland SK Reach Restore4ion -
Capihal Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grants - - - - - - _
General Fund - - - - - - -
10 Eastridge Manor Outfall Replacement
Capital Costs 810,000 - - - - - 810,000
FundingSources:
StoFm Fund 810,000 - - - - - 870,000
Grants - - - - - - .
BondProceeds - - - - - - -
11 Vegetaticn Sorting Facility
Capital Costs - 750,000 - - - - 750,000
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund - 750,000 - - - - 750,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
12 Hillside D�ainage Assessment
Capital Cosfs 139,000 150,000 - - - - 289,000
Fundjng Souraes:
Storm Fund 139,000 150,000 - - - - 289,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - .
13 North Airport Area lmprovements
Capital Costs - 218,000 - - - , 218,000
Funding Sources:
Srorm Fund - 218,000 - - - - 218,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - .
14 D St.SE Stwm Im proyement
Capital Costs - 2D0,000 1,627,000 - - - 1,827,000
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund - 200,000 1,627,000 - - - 1,827,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -.
15 INest Hill Mnexation Area Drainage Improvements
Capital Costs - 317,000 408,000 - 304,000 - 7,029,000
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund - 317,000 408,000 - 304,000 - 1,029,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
16 30th Street NEArea Fooding,Phase 16
CapiFal Costs 1,060,000 - - - - - 1,060,000
Funding Saurces:
Sto�m Fund 807,158 - - - - - 607,158
Bond Proceeds 252,842 - - - - 252,842
149
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-2
2076. 2077 2018 _ _ 2019. 2020_ _ _. ;2021 ._ Total
_ _ _— - - -._. _— ___ _ _—
Non-Cacacitv Proiects:
17 Mnual Citywide Storm Pipeline and Replacement Project
Capital Cosfs 245,618 - - - - - 245,818
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund 245,618 - - - - - 245,678
_ Bond Proceeds_ _ _ = - - - - - -
18 23rdStreet'SEStorm Improvement
Capifzl.Costs - - 316,500 - - 316,500 633,000
Funding Sources:
Storm Fund - - 316,500 - - 316,500 633,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
Sutitotal,Non-Capacitv Proiects:
Capital Costs 2,459,618 3,631,000 2,751,500 3,024,000 1,104,000 4,084,500 17,054,618
_ _ _ _._
SUMMARY:
CAPRALCOSTS
CapacityProjects 380,000 251,000 - - - - 631,OQ0
Non-CapacityProjects 2,459,618 3,631,000 2,751;500 3,024,000 1,104,000 4,084,500 17,054,618
TotalCosGs 2;839,618 3,882,000 2;757;500 3;024;000- 7;104;000 4;084;500--77,685;618
RINDMGSOURC6:.
StormFund 2,586,776 3,882,D00 2,751,500 3,024,000 1,104,000 4;084,500 1Z;432,776
Grants - - - - - - -
Other - - - _ -
Bond ProceeCs 252,842 - - - - - 252,842
Total Funding �2,839,618 3,882,000 �2,751,500 3,024,000 1;104,000 4,084�,500 17,685,67$
150
Ciry of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
S70RIVI DRAINAGE FUND (432) Cap�ta�Fac�pt�es Plan
� S&�YearCapital FacilRies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjecErUe: M Street SE Storm Improvement.
ProjectNo: Cp1571
ProjectType: Capacity
Project Manager: Matt LarSOn
Description:� -
This project will install a replacemeM pipe of greater capacity from 3rd SVeet SE to.MainStreet to alleviate periodic flooding in this
area as a resuR of�upstream flows conveying witM1in replaced lines associated with earlier projects.
P�ogress Summary:
In design.
FutureJmpact on Operating Budget:�
None,since this is a replacemerit pipe.
. Activity:�.
� 2075 YE 2016 Year�End
Funding Sources Prior to 2015 Es[imate 2018 Bud9et 2077 Budget Project�Total
UnresWcted�Stam Revenue - 60;000 340,000 - 400,000
Grants-Secured.(Fed,State,Loca/) - - - - _
Bond Proceeds - - _ _ _
Other
Total Funding$ources: _ "�- :60;000� 340,000 - 400,000
Capital F�cpenditures
Design - 60,000 - - 60,000�
Right o/Way - " _ ..
. Construction � � 340,000 340,000��
Total Erzpentliturex �- " �60;OW� " ,340,000 - 400,00.0
Forecasted Prqecf Cost:
Total
2078 2019 2020 2027 2016202t ..
Funding Sources �
UnresMcted.StainRerenue - - - - 340.000
Giants-Secured(Fed,State,Loca!) - - - _ _
Bond Proceetls - - _ _ _
ONrer
To1al Funding Sources. - - - - 340,000
Capltal Expentlittirex
Design - _ _ _ _
RigM of Way - _ _ _ ._
Conshuction - - 3qp,ppp
Total F�cpeudimres - ' ' ' ----" � - 340.000
151
City ofAuburn Draft Capitkl Faci'lities Plan
-- --- - — _ ---- __ __ _
- -- -
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) cePtta�Faodrttes Plan
Six Year CapitalFacilities PIan;2016-2021 Enterprlse Funds
ProjeotTiae: 37th St. NW Storm Improvement
Projec4 No: sdbd05
ProjectType: CapaC_ity �
ProjectManager. TBD
Description: �
This project would inorease ezisting pipesdo provitle additional capacity to.alleviate current periodiaflooding�condkions in vicinity ofJ
St. NW. Thiswould�also provide relief to the flooding experienced on the interurban Bike Trail.
2015 C�omprehertsive_Stortn-Drainage PIan,Project No.2�
Progress Summary:�
Future Impact on Operating Budgef:� �
Nor�e
. .. . - - - - -- --� - -- ..
Activity:.
� 2015 YE 2076 Year EnA
FunCingSourcez� PAorto�2075 Estlmate 20168utlgeY. 2017BuAeet ProJect3ota.1
UnrestdctedSfortnReeenue - -� -40.000 251,D00 40;OOQ
G2nts-Secured��(Fed,State;Local) - - - - -
� BondProceeds - - - - -
Other
Total FunHing Sourees: , . • 40,OU0 251,000. 40,000
CaPifal.Expenditures
��� � �Design - - 40.000 -� �40,OD0
RighFofWay - - - - -
� Consfiiction 251,000
Total EzpentliWres - - 40;000 257,000� � "-" -'40;000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2019 2019 _20Z0. _. _2027. __ _20162021.__
FOndingSourws:. . _ _ _ .. ___ ._._—_—_ __.. --_ __.__
UnresMcted Stwm Rewnue - - - - 291,000
Grants-Secuied(Fed;State,Local) - - - - -
.. �. .. .. � Bond Proceeds ' - ' ' '
Other -
Total Funding Sources ' ' ' ..-- .- ..._ ._—�291-,000�
Caplfal Expenditures
Design - - - - 40,000
Right W WaY� _ ' ' ' '
ConstNction 251,000
Total.F�cpenditurex. - - - - ��291,000� �
1S2
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) caP�ta�Facnit�es F�an
Six Year Capital FacilitiesPlan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
Projectrtle: Pipeline Repair 8� Replacement Program
Project No: sdbd03
Projectrype: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: TBD
Des'c�iptio'n:
Projects identified as those requiring replacement of ebstirg infrastructure. These projects support sfreet repairs and other
ulility reptaqement programs,requirirzj 000rdination. Two projects haee received funding transfers from this o�.erall
Program. Those transfers out of tFus Program and inro projects are identified below as E�enditures.
2015 Comprehereive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 1
Progress$ummary:
During 2015 funding was transferred for the following:projects: The 2011 Storrn Repair&Replacemerrt project($830,000)
and the Mill Creek Wetland 5K Restoration project($75,000)
No significant impact
Activity:�
2075 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSouices Pdorto.2015 .Estlmafe 2016Butlget 2017.Bud9et ProJeetTolal
UnresMctedSlwmRevenue - - 1,000,000 100,000 1,000;000 1,100,000
Grants-Secured(Fetl,State,Loca/) - - _ _ _
Bond Proceeds - - _ _ _
ONrer
Tofal Funding Sources - 1;000,000 700;000 �7;000,000 1,100,000
Capi�i.F�cpendiWres
Design - - 100,000 - 100,000
Right oI way - - - _
Construction . 1,000,000 1,000.000 1,000,000
Totsl ExpentliWres - 7,000,000 100;000 �1;000,000 - � -�-1,100,000
Forecastetl Project Cdst:
Toal
2018 2019 2020 20Z7 20162027
Funtling Sources
UrrcesMctedStarrrRevenue 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 3,300,000
Grdnts-Secured(Fed,-Sfate,LocaQ - - _ � _ _
Bond�Proceeds - - - . .
Other
Total FOnHing Sourcex 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 3,300,000
Caplfal EapentliWres
.. Design ' ' ' ' 100.000
Right W Way ' ' ' ' '
Consbuctlon 100:000. 1,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 3200,000
Total ExpendlWrex .100,000 " 7;000;000 100,000 1,000,000 3,300,000
153
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) CapRal Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital Pacilities PIan,3016-2021 Enterprlse Funds
ProjectTitle: 30th S.treet NE Area Flooding, Phase 2
ProjectNo: Sdbd01
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Descrlption:. _ . - -- _ _.._ _-- ----- - --
Corstnct a rrew stortn�.system to drain stormwater from Mro multi-famiy deyelopmeMs at the.west edge of ttie fortne�
CRISTA Ministries property. Currently,stormwater is dischargetl onto a�depressed area on the CRISTA Ministries�property
wFie2 its irfiltration is�limited by high groundwater levels that occur during extended periods of high flows on.fhe:Green
River.This phase would consVuct a new stortn drain within I St. NE so.uthward;o cormect irrto the-upgraded 42�nch
tliameter(Phase 1)storrn.drain near the iMersectidn at I St. NE and 30th St NE�.The 42-inch diameter line would haos
suFficierrt available capacity to corney the 1 St NE flows.Key componeMs of Phase 2 include: 1,760 feet of 15-inch
diameter�gravity stortn draiq.Catch basin and incidental grading to colled stortnwater at the upstream.end of system
2015 Comprehe_nsiye StorrnDrainage Plan Project No,4A
Progress S.ummary: - - - � - -
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
No significant impact
AGt1VIIy:�.
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding5ources PAwto2075 EffiImah 2078Budgat 2017.Budget Pro)actTofal
UnresVictedSfamRevanue - - - 8�.000 =
Grants-Secured(FeqState,Local) - - - - -
Bond Procoeds - - - - -
Other
Tofal�Fumling Sources - • - 896,000 -
Capifnl:ExpenAih�res
Deslgn - - - �75,000 -
RighROIWaY _ ' ' ' '
Consnuctlon 821,000 .
roai.�pe�ain,ras - - -- _ ase,aoo -
Forecasted Project Cost: � � �
Total
2018 2019 2020 3027 �201&2021
Funding Sourcea
UnresWcted Storm Revenue - - - - 896,000
Grants-Secured(Fed,Stere,Local) - - � - - -�
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
OMer
Totsl�FundingSourcas - - . 896,000
CepiJel.Expenditures
Deslgn - - -� - 75.000
R/ghto/WaY ' ' ' ' _
ConsWct/ar 821.000
TotslFxpendltures ' ' ' • .898.000-.
154
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- -- _. . _ __
STORM DRi41NAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilkies Plan
SUcYear Capital Facilkies_Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise.Funds
ProjectTine: 30th Street NE Acea Flooding, Phase 3
Prqject No: CpXX)CX �
ProjectType: Non-Gapacity
ProjectManager. TBD
. ._ .--._ . .
Descifption:
This project would reduce flooding�in C St.NE�by redirectirgwet weather high flows southward to the 42-inch iiiameter
(Phase 1)stortn drain in'30tYi�S;.NE.By Fedirecti_ng the C�S.t NE�drainage iiito the Brannan Park system,these flows would
no longer be affected by high water levels in Mill C2ek-.To awitl deepening the Phase 1 gravity line(and�eMensi4e,retrofits
to the Brannan Park�pump station),4his projectwoutd include.a wet weather pump station and force main connection to 30th
St NE.The upgraded 42-inch�diameter pipe in 30th St.NE�would have�sufficient capacityfor these additional flows.Key
componerds of Phese 3 include: Wetweatherpump station(estimated capacityof4.5 to 7 cfs), 1,730 feetof 15-inch
diametervforce main;Diversion sVucture in C St NEfor pump sfation
2015�CompreFieris.ive Storm�Drai nage Plan Project No.4B
P�og�e'ss3ummary: � '
, _ .. . .. . . . _. _ . __ . . .
Future�lmpact on Operating Budget:
No significant impact.
ACt1Vlf�l:� __ "'_
2015 YE 2076 Year.End
Funding�Sources: Prlor to 2075 Estimata 2016 Butlget 2017 Butlget Pro ect 7ofal
Unreslncted Storm Revenue - - _ _ _.
, Grants-Secured(Fed,State,LocaQ - - - _ _ �
Bond Proceeds - _ _ _ _
Other
7ota1 Funding Sourcesi � - _. _ . . . - . _--- c-
Capital Expantliwres:
Design ' - ' ' '
Rlght of Way " ' ' '
Construction
Tota�F�cpenditures " ' ' ' '
Foiecasted P�oject Cost:
Tofa I
2078 20t9 2020 202L .. _30'162021 _
FundingSourcex - --- --
UnrestnctedSlwmRevenue '200,000 1,924,000 - - 2,]24,000
Gran[s-Secured(Feii,State,LocaQ - - _ _ _��
Bond Proceeds - _ _ _ _
OtFrer
Tofal Funding Sourees - � ""� 200;000 7;924,000 - 2,124,000
Capital.F�cpendi[ures
Design 200,OOQ - -� - 200,000
RightofWay - - _ _ _
ConS(NCtlon - 1�,924,000 1�,gpQ,Qpp
Total Ezpendilures - - -�200.000� -�7.924,000 - - 2,11A.000
155
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ __ _ - - -- — - - -- - _ _ -- -
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capitai eac�lrt�es'P�an
Six Yea�CapkalFaeilities�.Plan,-201Cr2021 EnterpriseFunds�.
_
ProjectTiue: WesYMain Street Pump Station Upgrade
Project,No; sdbdll�
Projectrype: 'Non-Gapacity
ProjectManager: TBD
Description:.
This projectwill upiiate the ewsting pump.station by providing a redundarrt pump and telemetry system meetiru�Jevel of
servine goals,install newfnrce maimand outlet
2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. T
Progress Summary:
Future Impad�on Opereting Budget:
No,significant impact
Activity:
2015 YE 2016 Yaac End
Funding.Sourcez Pdor to 2015 Fstimate 20�6 Budget 2017 Butlget ProjectTotal�
UnresMcted�Storin Revenue - - - - - -
G@nts-$ecured(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
orna.
Total Funqing:�Sources: ' ' ' -- - -- --�--�-----�-
Capital Ezpentlitures
_._ ._ _ -.' Design ' ' ' '
Righf o/INaY - ' - ' '
Conshuction
TotalExpentlit�res _ ' _.. . ._._. . ._. ___. .
Forecasted-Project Cost: �-
TMaI
�2018 2079 ___ .2020 _. . _____ 202t.____._. _20162021
Funding Sources .. . - . _ _ _—__ _ _ . . ._ . . . _ _.
Uniestncted Stomi Revsnue - - 300,000 2,668;000 2,968,OU0�
Grants-Secured{Fed,Btate,Locap. • - - - - -
_ . ..._ . ... .
..�. 6ondProceeds ' ' ' ' '
Otfrer
�Total Fuiiding Sourcez - r 300,OQ0 ��2,668,000' ��-2,966,000�
Capifal ExpendiWrex
.Design. - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968;000
Righf of�.Way - - - -
C'ori"struction.
Total F�cpe.nditures: - - 300,000 '2.668,000 2,968,000
156
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ __-- --- .
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) CapitafFacilities Plan
SixYear Capital Faeilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiue: Street Utility Improvements
ProjectNo: sdbd04
Rrojec;Type: Non Capacity
ProjectMarager. TBD
Description: - � � � �- - � --
8torm drairiage corn,ejance improvemerrts in coordination with Arterial and SOS improvements.
2015 Comprehensive Stortn Drainage Plan Project No. 12
Progress Summary: - �� --
__--__ . _. _ .. . .
Future Impact on Opereting Budget �� � - �
No��significaM hnpact .
Activiryi -
� Predous 2 years 2075 YE �2016 Year End
Funding Sources Prlor W 2015 Estimate._. _2076Budget 20tt Butlget ProJectTotal
Unres[nctedStormRevenue 233,367 �100;000 - 100,000� � -�-� � �100;000- -"�--" 433;367
Grents-Secured(Fed,State,Locaq - - - .
Bond Proceetls - - _ _ _
Other -
Total FunAing Sourcex 233,367 700,000 100,000 700,000 � � 433;367
Capiql F�cpentlitures
.. . ...Design 15.296 - ' ' 15,296
Ri9ht of�Way - - ' _ _
Constn,ction 218,071 100,000 100,000. 100,000 418,O7t
Total EzpendiWres 233,367� 700,000 700,000 700,000 433;367�
Forecasted Projeet Cost: � � �
7ota I
2078 2019 2020 2021 20762021
Funding Sources
Unrestncted Storm Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000� 600,000
Grents-Secured(Fed,State;Local) - - _ �- _ � � _
Bond Proceatls - - _ _ _
Otlrer
Total Funding Sources 100,000 100;000 700,000 700,000 600,000
CaPital ExPandiWres:
Design ' ' ' ' , '
Right oI Way - - - _ ._
Conshuction 100,000 .100,000 100,000. 100,000 600,000
Tofal ExpenHit�re� 100,000 100,000 � 100;000 " 100,000 - � � 600,000
157
City ofAuburrc Draft Capitkl Facilities Plan
- -- -- -- - . . _
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capltal Facilttles Plan
Si�c Year Capital�.Facilities Plan;�2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Upda4e
Project No: cpxxxx
Projectrype: Non-Capacity
ProjectMarnager. Tim CaFIaW
Descriptlon:
Update the Comprehensive Stortn DrainagePlan to be consisteM with the City's overall Comprehensige.Plan�.upda;eas�-required
by the State of Washiiigtori.
20'15'Gom prehensive:Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 9
Progress��Summary:.
Future]mpact ort Operating Budget:.
None
Activity:
- - - - -- - . __.. .__ . . . .
2075 YE �2016 Ysar End
Funding5ourees PAorto2015 .Fsfimata 20168utlget 201ZButlget ProJectTotdl .
UruastnctedStbrmRevenue ---��--�- ' T--- ---- ��- --��
Gienfs-Secured.(Fed,Stale,Local) - - - - -
Bontl Pioceeds - - . - -
Other - _'_- _ - - _- - - -
_ _ _ . __ ___ ._ _ . _—_ _ -
Tota(FunAing Sources: . - - - -
Capital Expendidires:
- DesiBn - - - - '
RigAFofWeY _ _. '
Construclion = - - - -
. . ._ _ _ . . .._ _.
T�I.F�cpenditurere� - - -. - ...
Forecasted ProjecfCost: . . .-� --� �- �-�- ----- - �---�--- � � -- ---� . .
rofal
2018 2019 2020 �2027 2018-2U27
Funding�Sourcex
UmesMcted Storm Re�snue� - - 300,000 - 300,000
. ._ .. _.. _ . . . . . ...
Grants-Secured(Fed;State.Local) - - - - -
Bond Pioceeds� - - - - -
Otfrer - - .. - - -
—._________. . . _ _
Tofal FundinA'Sources - - 300,000 - 800,000�
Caplfal Expendidirex
- �- Design� - - 300,000 .. 300.000.
Right o/INaY ' ' "� ' '
Construction � �
TofalEzpendlWres - - 300,000 � ----="----- " -300,000"
158
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capkal Facilities Plan
.Siic Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Enferprise�Funds
ProjectTiEe: Mili Creek Wetland SK Reach Restoration
Project No: CP0746
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Chris�Andersen
Description: � - -
Mill Creek Wetland SK reach(W5K)is a stream restoration project to provide improyed cornreyance arxf habifat along an
appro�dmate one mile reach of Nlill Creek behveen West Main Street and.SR 167.The project includes construotion of a
new IaYger stream oulvert at'151h Street NW for impro�.ed hydraulie corrveyance arW fish passage,removal of irnasiw
vegetation,native tree and shrubplaMings. The project.is being�conducted in partnership with tl�e Artny Corps of
Erigineers under the Corps'Ecosystem Restorztion Program.The Cily's cost share for construction is 35%,.and ihe
faderel cost share is 65%.The value of Ciryowned lands used�for fhe project are credited toward the Citys cost share.
Total federal funding for the project(not shown below)is approwmately$3.9 miliion based on the most recent Corps
estimates of$6 million for total project costs.
Progress Summary: ,
In construction. Project corstruction is scheduled to be complete in 20'15.
.. .- -- ._ . . _. . _--
Future�impact on Operating Budget:
Monitoring of tlie project is part of the o�.erall project cost.Upon completion of consfixtion,the Artny Corps will mdnitor for
fi�.e(5)years,Monitorirg costs are subject to City cost share(35%);City share of estimated mortitorirg costs previously
paid to Army Co{ps in 2074.tutairrtenance tor the project is budgeted as part of the Ernrironmerrtal Services AEP and
restoration site�maintenance program.
Activiry: - -
2015 VE 20�6 Year.EnA
Funtlinp Sourcec: Prlor M 2015 ESSimate 20�6.Butl et 2017.Budget . Pro'ect.Tofal
Geneia�Funtl 32,555 - - _� -' ' ----'32;555-.
Un/BSMttedStOrmReventie 1,186.833 185,207 5,000 - '1,877,040
Grents-�Secmed(Fed,Stete,Local) 53'I,672 270,021 - - 801,693
C/ry(Weter,:Se4sr) 472 �.,q7p.
Totel Funtling Sources: 7,757,532 455,228 5,000 - 2,211,760
Cepltel Expenditurea
Design 454,191 ' ' ' 454.191
R/ghto/Wey 350,449 250,000 - - 600.449
LERRD Credit (900,000) - - - (900,000)
Cans(rv<tion �,846,892 205,228 5.000 2,057,120�
Tofal Expentlltures 7,751,532 453,128 5.000 - 2,Y11,760
Foracasted-Project Cost: -
Total
20'18 2019 2020 2021 _ ,2076-202i._ _
Funtlinp Souices
General Fund - - - - _
UrnesfActed Sfomr Revenue - - - - 5,000
GrantsSecured(Fed,Stele,Loca!) - . _ _ _
Gty(Wefer, Sener)
Tofal FunAing Sourcas� - - - - 5,000
Gpital Expenditums
. .. _ ..pes/g^ ' ' ' ' '
RighfolWay ' - ' ' '
ConsWcilon 5,000
Tofal Exps,ntlitures ' '� - ' ' " ' 5,000
159
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - - _
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capifal Facilities PWn
SIx YearCapkal Facilkles Plan,.2016-2021 EMerprise Funds._
Projectrtle: Eastridge Manor Outfall Replacement
Projeallo: cp1316
Projearype: Non,Capacity
Projeccnnareger. Joel Chalmers
Description; . ..---..- - . . . _ � -.� .
Replace Uie ebsting deterioreted outfall with new High Density Polyethylene(HDPE). Two ewsting�out�alls may be
combirred into a single outfall. knpro�merits to ttie Golf Course oornreyance system may be:needed.
Prog�ess Summa_ry:
- _ _ _. - - - -
None
Futu_re Impact on Ope@;ing Budgetc - - - - --
None
Ac4ivity:
2075 YE 2018 Year End
Funding Soulcoa PAor Oo 2015 Estlmale 2018 Butlget 2077�Butlget _ _.ProjectTotnl
UnreSfricted.SformRevenue 33,484 276,536 810;000 - 1,120,000�
Grants-Secured,(Fed,State,Localj - - - - - -
Bond Proceea's - - - - -
Other
Tofal Funding Sources 33,464 276,538 810;000 - 1,120,000
Capl�l Expendiwres
Design 33,464 91�,536 - �-� 125;000
Riqhf o/Way - 185.000 - - 185;000
ConsWcfion 810,000 810,000
Topl ExpendiWres 33,464 278,538 870;000 --= ------��-��1;120;000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tom�
2018 2019 1020._ . -- - 2021 -—2076-2021._ .
FundingSources ..� . . - . - - .�__. _ _ - . __. __ _.
UnresMcred�Stwm Reaenue - - - - 810.000
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,LocaQ - - - - -
. . . Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Otfrer
Tolal FunEing Sources - - - . .. __ = . . . .. _ _--._ . -�810:000"
Ca pfta I.F�[penditures
Desi9n ' ' ' ' '
RigAF.o/WaY ' ' ' ' '
Conshvction - 810,000
Totel Expendidirax - - - � 810,000
160
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities I'lan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) CapitalFacilitiesPlan
Six Year_Capital FacilRies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Furids
ProjectTitle: Vegetation Sorting Facility
Project No: Cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: TBD
Description:
Eyaluation to determine benefits and costs of acquiring propertyto use as a�egetation sorting faciliry prior to disposal or
reiise�of materials from storrn drairiage maintenarx;e actiNties_(e:g.,pond and ditch cleaning)...In addition,evaluate�
poterrtial for use by other City Departments and tiy neighb�oring junsdictions asa regional facility. IFevaluation shows a
reasonable benefiUcost ratio,budget is for property acquisition and site improvements to consVuct the vegetation sorting
facility.
2015 Comprehensive Stortn Drainage Plan Project No. 10
Progress-Summary: � �� � �
Pufure�lmpact on Operating Budget: � � - - � -
Impaots to the operating budget are included in subsequent years�after acquisition of the rightof-way.
Agtivity:
2015 YE 2078 Year Entl
Funding Sources: Prior to 2015 E4lmate 2076 Budget 201TBudget Pro)ect Total
� Un2sincted SFam Rewnue " "-_�"� - - - - 750,000 -
Grents-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - _ _ _
Bond Proceetls - - _ _ _
Other -. _
Tofal Funding Sources: - - � - 750,000 -
Capital ExpentliWres
Design - - _ _ _
Right of Way - - - 750,000 -
COnStfuCti011 �
Total F�cpentliWres _ - _ . . 750;000
Forecasted Project Cost: �� " ---
Total
2078 2019 ZOZO 2027 201&2021
Funding Sources
Un�esMcted Storm Re�snue - - - - 750,000
Giants-Secured(Fed,Sfate,Loca!) _ _ _ _ _
� Bond Proceeds - - _ _ _
Other
Tofal Funtling Sources �" - - . - 750,000.
Capital EzpendiWres:
Design - - - -
Righto/lNay - . - - 750,000
Construction �� ..
� � Total EzPenHilures ' ' ' - ' � �750.000
161
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan
_ _
Six Year_Capital:Facilkies PIan,2016-2021._ . _. .. Enterprise Funds
ProjectrUe: Hillside Drainage Assessment
Project No: sdbd07
Project7ype: Non-Capacity
ProjectMarnager. TBD
__
Dgsy�iption:
The existing drainage system indudes pipes that discharge wer hillsides.While a preliminary irnentory-and mapping of locstions
has been complefed�,field-bcating and detailed InspecGon is waRarrted to defi_ne deficienqies.
2015 Gomprehen5i4e Stortn Drainage Plan Project No.3
ProgressSummary:.
�- � -- - � -- --- . ._ _ __.
F.utureJmpact on Operating BudgeE �
None
Activky:
2015 YE 2016 Year Entl
Funding Sourcex. PAor to 2015 F�fmate 2018 Budget �2077 Budget Projecf Tofal
Unrestflctetl Storm Revenue - - t39,000 150;000 139,OOC
Oren[s-Secured.(Fed,$tate,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceetls - - - - -�
Other
Total Funding�Sources - - - �- �739,000" " �� 150,000" -� -- 139,000-
CaPital FxPendlNres
- Design - - 139,000 - 139;000
liight o%tNay - - - 50,000 -
ConStNCtion - - -� 10Q,000. ____ ____ . __
Tbtal EzpendlWres: - - = 739,000� 150,000 139,000�
. ___. _... ...
�Forecasted-ProjectCost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 2021 2016Z027
Funding Sources
UnresMcted Stoim Revanue - - - - 2g9.��
Grants-Secuied�(Fed,State;Local) - - -. - .
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
. .. .. Otrier - - -
' ' _
TotalF4ndingSwrcas _ _ -. . ...-_-__ ___. _... _ _ 288.000-
Capital ExpendiWres
Design ' ' ' ' 139,000�.
Righ[ofWay - - - - 50j000
Consbuction 1UU,OUO
Total F�cpendlWres - - • . 289.000
162
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capitkl Facilities Plan
_ -- -
- - -- - -
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year CapitalFacilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTtle: North Airport Area Improvements
PrqjectNo: sdbdl0
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: TBD
DescriptionF � � � �
This prqect would provide additionalstorage�depth in Pond I and replace the epsting inlet pipe at a lower invert to the pond,-and
install a backflow preveMer at the outlet. The projec.t also includes�the installation�of a second baclCiow preveMer at the overflow to
30th St.NE to protect the hangar area.
2015 Comprehensive Stortn Drainage Plan Project No.6
Progress Summary:
Futu"re Imp'act on Opereting Budget:
None
Acti4ity:
2015 YE 2016'Year Entl
Funding Source. Prior to 2015 Estimate 2016 6utlget 2017 8udget Project Total_
UnresMcted Storm Revenue - - - 218,000 -
Grants-Secured(FedStafe,Local) - - � - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
TOWFFuntlingSourcex - - - 218,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - �40,000 -
Righto/Way - - - - _
CO/IS�NC�IOO 17$,�DU
Total EzpenGimres: - - - 278,000 -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2078 .2018 2020 2027 201&2027
Funding Sources: " " . . .. . . . .� �" - ---." . .
Unrestncfed Storm Revenue - - - - 218,000
Grants-Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local). - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other ' _
Total Funding Sourcex - - - - 218,000�
Capital ExpendiNres
Design - - - - 40,000
Riglit a(WaY ' ' ' ' _
Construction - 178,000�
Total ExpendiWres � ' ' ' ' 218.000
163
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-- -- — - - --- -- - _. .__ _ _ - - - -- - -
- - --- --- -
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Fac�lities Plan
Six Year CapitalFacilkies Blan,20162021 EMerprise Funds
ProjectTtie: D St. SE Storm Improvement
Project No:- Cpxxx �
Projectrype:: Non-Gapacity
Project��Manager.� TBD
Description: . ._ . .. _. _ -_ __ ._.. - -- -___._. ._. _._-
This project would replace the existing line along D St.SE from 21 st�St.SE to 27th St SE'�and�install a new lina along F St.-�SE
from 26thSt SE to�27th St.SE. The project will eliminate an existing injection well near 25th&D�St.SE.
2015Eomprefiensive Storrn�Dreinage Plan Projeot No.7
Progress Summary:
Fufuielmpacton�OperatingBudget:: � �� �� � �
None
Activity;
2075 YE �2016�Yeer End
FunHing Sources: PAor to 2075 .Estimate 2078 Bud9et. 2017�Budget ProJect Total
Unrestricted Storin Revenue - - - 200,000 -
Grants-:Secured�(Fed,Stare,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Othec
Total FunHing Sources. - - - 200,D00�
Capital_Expendittires�
� Desi9n ' ' ' 200�000 -
Right W INaY - - - - '
QO115�/GC�iO/1
Total.Fxpendltures " " ' 200.000 '
.Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
_ 2018 . _ 2019 .. _ _. .:2020"___...—_2027 _'__. .__2018-2021__
FundingSources: . - . .. . - . ..._. .
UnrestNcted Stwm Reeenue 1,627,000 - - - 1,827�,000
Grents-Secured(Fed State,Lwal) - - - - -
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
orne�.
Total:FundingSourcex: 7;627,000 " _ — -" -""-- -- -"—��-��1;827;000�
Capffal�.ExPendlWres
Design - - - - 200,000
Right of Wey - - - -
ConsWction 1,627,000 1,627,000
ToWI Ezpendidires 1,627,000 - � . � 1,827;OW�
164
City ofAuburn Draft Capitg[Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan
Siz Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiue: West Hill Annexation Area Drainage Improvements
ProjectNo: CpXXX
ProjectType: Non-Gapacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Descriptiqn: � � �
Improve existing d2inage cond'Rions�for the West Hill annexation areas. The 2017 prqect inoludes improvements near 330th St.
and 46th PI.5.to improve dreinage conditions alorg 330fh�St and eliminate roatlside discharge onto private property. The�20'18
project inclutles improJemeMs near S 314th St.and 54th A4e SYo eliminate a disohartje oMo private�pmperty.
20'f5 Comprehensive Stortn Drainage Plan ProJect No.5Aand 58
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budgef:
None
Acti4ity:. -- - - -
2015 YE. 2076 Year.End
Funding Sources PHor to 2075 ESimate 2016 Budget 2017 Butlget PrdJect Tofal..
UnrestNcted�Storm Rewnue - - - 317,000 -
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) -� - - �- -
Bond Proceetls - - - - _
Other
Total Funding Sourees: - - - 317,000 �-�
Capltal Eupentliturea
Desipn - - - 35,000 -
Right W Way - - - _ _
Construction 282,000
Total Expendltures: - - - - 317�,000 -
. ._ .. _ _ . ..._ . _ _ _ ..
Foreeasted Project Cost: - � � -
Total
2018_ 2019 . 2020 2021 2016�2021
Funtling Sourcea . . . -- - .... -
UMestncted Stam Rewnue 408:000 - 304,000 - 1,029,000
Grants-Secured(Fed State,Loca/) - - - - _
Bond Proceeds - - - _
�fhBf - _
Tofal Funtling Sources 408,000 - 304;000 �"- " -- - 1,029,000
Ca pita I 6c pe nd Iture s.
OBsign 60,000 - 30,000 - 125,000
Right of Way - - 50,000 - SO,ODO
Construction 34b,0U0 224,000 854,000
Totai Expendifures 408.000 - 304,000 - 7.0�.000
165
City ofAuburn Draft Cgpitgl Facilities Plan
_ - - . __. .
STORM DRAINAGE FOND (432) Capital Facilkies Plan
Six Year_Capital Fadlities,Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Fuods
ProjectTitle: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1 B
ProjectNo: CpxXX
Pro]ect7ype; Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Klm TruOng
Description:
This projec[will complete the Phase 1 project by completing the downstrearrm systerrm riot completed in.Phase 1A. Phase
1A replaced tlie epsti_ng 30�+nch diameter pipe gerierelly locatetl along Vie 30th St NE alignment toward I St NE to
improve dreinage.conditions in and aroimd the noAh end of the Aubum M�micipal AirpoR Phase�l B will complete the
remainder of llie project by consfi.�cting the downstream system to the epsting Brarnan Paric pump station.
Progress Summary:
- - - - -
Futu►e Impacfon U`peiating Budgef:
No sigrdficaM impact
Actiyity:
zo�e ve 2016 Year Entl
Fundlnp�3ourcea Prldrto2015 EaGmata 20168ud0et .20778uA8et ProjectTotal
UnrestdctedSformRe�enue - - 807,158 - 807;158
Grants-Secured(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - 154,000 252;842 - 406;842
Other - - -
Total Funding Sources: - 1$4,000 1,060,000 - 7,216,000�
Capital Ficpenditures:
� Design - 154,000 - - 154,000
Rlgbt oI WaY ' ' ' ' '
Constructi0n 1,060,000. - _1.060,000�.
Total EtcpendlWrea - 754,W_0 - - 7,060;000� - 1,214,000
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 2021. 2016d021
Fund{ng Soureea . .. .... _..--...- .�. ...----
Unrestdcted�Stam�Re�enue - - - - 807,158
Gianfs-Secured(Fetl,'§tefe,Locaq - - - - -
Bontl�Proceeds - - - - 252,842
OMBf - -
Total FunAlnp Sources: ' ' " - 1.060.000
Capital Ezpendltire�
� Design - - - - -
Righf oI WeY ' _ ' ' '
C.011311UCIIM �.��.�
Total ExpendlWrea - - - - 1,060,000
166
City of Auburn Draft Capital Fqcilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilkies Plan
Six Year:Capital Fadlities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiUe: Annual Citywide Storm Pipeline and Replacement Project
Project No: tp1312
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Mareger. S2th WiCkStfom
Desc`riptfon:
Project replaces epsting stortn system irfiastrucMe. This is originaly budgeted in ttre 2011 R&R Program. Funding is
from.the 2015-2016�Pipeline Repair and Replacement Program.
Progress�Summary:
Broject deferred to 2016.
Future Impact on Operating Budget;
No significant impact
Activity:
2015 VE 2p16 Year.End
Funding Sourcea Prlor to 2015 Estlmate 2016 Butlget 2017 Budget Projeet Total
� UnresMcted Sfwm Revenue � 47,382 -�" " " 40;000 245,618 - 333,000
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,LoceQ - - _ _ _.
BondProceeds - - - ._ _
Other -
Total Funding Sourcea 47,382 40,000" 245,618 - �� " �" --_-- � 333,000
Capltal 6cPentlltures
Design 47,382 40,000 1,000 - 88,382
Right o(Wey - - _ _ _
Constn�ctiori 244,618 244,618 �
Tofal Expenditurea 47,382 40,000� 245;618�- � -" - 333,000
ForecasteH-ProjectCost: �- �
Total
2078 2078 ?A20 2021. _ 20162027
__._. _
. Funding Sources -- �-
UnresMetetl Sform Reeenue - - - - 245.618
Grents-Sec�iretl(Fei/,Sfate,LocaQ - - _ _ � _� �
Bond Proceeds - - _ _ _
Ofher
Total Funding Sources: _ _ _ _ �g�g
Capital ExpendiWres
.. .. pesqn ' ' _ _ 1,000
Right of Way - - - _ _
QO115/NCII0I1 - - - - 244.618
Total Expentlitures - ' ' ' .245,618
167
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ _--- -
-
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facii'ifiesPlan
Six Year Capkal Facilities Plan,20.16-2021 Enterprise_Funds:
ProjectTipe: 23rd Street SE'Storm Improvement
ProjectNo: Cpxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
--
Description:
This project will improve existing drainage conditions in vicinily of 23rd St.SE 8 K��St.SE. The 2018 project includes installation.of
a new 12-inch Ime along K St.SE from.23rd St SE to�21 st St.SE to alleviate flooding associated with.the pedestrian eritrance to
Terminal Park Elemerrtary School. The 2018 project inclu[les replacement of the existirg undersized iine with a 15-inch line along
23rd St.,SE�from F St.SE to H St.SE.
2015 Comprehensive Stortn Drainage Plan Project No.8
Progress Summary:
Future Impacton Opereting Budget � -- ��� � � - �
None
_ _ _.__
Activky: . . .. .. .
2015 YE. 2016 Year End
Funtling�Sonrcedi PHorto2015 Estlmam 2018Budget .2077Budget ProjectTofal
Unrostncted Storm Revenue - - - - -
Grents-Secured(FedStete,Lxal) - - - - -
6ond Proceetls - - - - -
Other
Total Funding�Sourees: • - - � -
Capital Expe.ndituros
Desi9n • ' ' ' '
Rlght W Wey - - - - -
Conshuctlon
� TotalEzPenditurea ' ' ' ' . . _.�_.
Foiecasted Project�Cost:
Tofal
2018 2019 2020. . _. _ . 2021_ .._—.2016Z02L _.
Funding SouFeea ___.._____._ ._ ._ _ . _ _ .. _. . .
UnrestActedStam�Re�+enue 316,500 - - 316,500 633,000
Grents-Secured(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other _
Total Funding Souroes 318,500 - -. 316,500 633;000
CaPkal Expendi4rtex
Design 30,000 - - 30,000 60,000
Righf o!WaY ' - ' ' '
Constniction .286.500 286,500 573.000
7otal Expenditures 31&500 �-� - 316,500 633,000
168
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
PARKS, ARTS AND RECREATION
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum's park system consists of a fotal of 940.54 acres of neighborhood and
community parks, special use areas, open space and linear parks (trails).
Table PR— 1 "Facilities Inventory" lists all park and recreation land in the City's park system
along with their current capacity and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS provided by the City s park system represents the existing inventory of City-
owned park acres divided by the 2015 City population of 75,b45. This equates to 0.77 acres per
1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 2.96 acres per 1,000 population for community parks,
0.23 acres for linear parks, 5.12 acres for open space, and 3:37 acres for 5pecial use areas.
The proposed LOS provided by the Cit�s park.system represents the planned 2021 inventory of
City-owned park acres divided by the 202.1 projected City population of 85,912. This equates to
0.79 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.12 acres per 1,000 population for
community parks, 0.24 acres per 1,000 population for linear parks, 4.50 acres per 1,000
population for open space, and 1.33 acres per 1,000 population for special use areas.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
Parks and Recreation facilities include si�een capital projects at a cost of$20,710,000. Tabie
PR—2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the
p"roject detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
As Table PR—3 shows, operating budget impacts of$1,074,000 are forecasted for parks and
recreation facilities during the six years 2017—2022.
169
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-7
Facilities Inventory
ParKs, Arts and Recreation, Larid
caPacirr
FACILITY _ _ . . _ (Acres)_ _LOCATION__ ___.__ __
- -- -
Neigtiborhoo0 Pa`rks: _ . -
Eicisting lnvelitory:�
21st Streef Playground 0.17 40521st St. SE
Aubumdale Park 9.74 31802 108th A�,e. SE
Ballard Park 0.68 1612 37th Way SE
Camerori Park 3.85 3727 Lemon Tree Lane
Cedar Lane Park 8.36 1002 25th St. SE
DorthyBotlie!lPark 4.35 1087 E�;ergreen Way SE
Dykstra Park 1.67 1487 22nd St. NE
Forest Villa mini park 0.21 1647 Fir St. SE
Gaines Park 1.33 1008 Pike St. NW
lndian Tom Park 0.42 �316 6th St. NE
Jomada Park 1.89 1433 U GY. NW
Kersey 3 Pa�k A 2.73 5480 Charlotte Aee. SE
Kersey 3 Park B 0.79 5530 Udall A�,s. SE
Lake/and Hills Park 5.06 1401 E�ergreen Way SE
Lea Hill Courts 'I.'IS 3212'I 105th PI. SE
Riverpoint Park 2.95 1450 32nd St. NE
Riversands Park 1.76 5014 Pike St NE
Rotary Park 3.89 2635 Alpine St. NE
Sc.00tie Brown Park 1.68 1403 Henry Rd. NE
ShaughnessyPark 3.46 3302 21st St. SE
Termina/Park 1.22 1292 C St. SE
Vi(lage Square 1.10 12111 SE 310th Sf.
Tota! Nerghborhooil Par/cs 58.49
Proposed Capacitv Proiectsr
Aubumda/e lI Park 9.35 29700 118th Street SE
Totel Prop"osed Capacity Projects 9.35
2021 Projected Inventory Total
- Nef hborhood Parks.- 67.84
Communfty Parks
Exlstlnq lnventorY.
Brannan Park 21.68 '10'19 28th St.. NE
Fulme�Fie/d 5.04 1101 Sth St. NE
Game Farm Park 57.20 3030 R St. SE
Game Farm Wildemess Park 48.50 2407 StucK Rirer Dr. SE
GSA Park 5.31 413 15th St. SW
1§aa'c.Evans Park 19.87 29627 Green Ri�,er Road NE
Lea Hill Park 5.26 31693 124th Are.:SE
Les Gove Park 14.68 910 9th St. SE
Mi!l Pond 4:20 4582 Mill Pond Dr, SE
Roegner Park 'I9.22 601 Oraretz Road
Sunset Parfc 15.15 1420 69th St SE
VeteYan's Memdna/Park 7.67 405 E St. NE
Total CommunityParks 223.78
170
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE.PR-1 (continued)
Proposed Eapacitv Proiects:
>04th Avenue SE �4.73 3�495 �O4th A�.e..SE
J2cobsOn Tree Farm 29.30 29387 '132nd A�,e SE
Tota/Proposed Capaclty Projects - 44:03'
2021 Piojeeted Inventory Tota_I .
- Communi Parks- 267.8�
LinearParks" - � � " � - � -
Eiristino Inventorv:
/nten�rban Trai/ 9.80 SOa West Ntain St.
Lake Tepps Perkkay Trai/ 2.36 �420 69th St SE
Lake/and Hi/!s T2if '1�:66 1087 Eeergreen WaySE
Reddington Levee Tral/ 2.25 �O�9 28th St NE
White Rive� Tiai/ 0.93 60� Ora„etzSt. NE
Tota/Linear Parks � �17.00-
Proposed Capacitv Pioiecfs:
Green Rive� Trail 0.83 277th to ReddingWn Le�ee Trail
Jacobsen Tree Farm to Green Rive� Trai/ 2.75
White River Tieil Extenslon O.OS
Tota/ PmposedCapacityPtojects ��- ��3.63
2021 ProJeeted Inventory�TOWI
- Linear Parks- 20.63_._ _
SpeeiafUse/►'easd �
Exisfrnd.lnventocv.�
Aubum Environmenta/Park �6.84 4]3 Western A�e NW
B Sfreet P/aza O.'10 �48 East�Main St.
Bicentennia/ Park 'i.07 502 Aubum WayS.
Centennia/ Vlewpoint Park 0.70 402 Mountain Vew Dr.
City Hel/ P/aia 'I.'10 25 West Main St.
C/ark P/aZa 0.25 i420 Auburn WayN.
Community Garo'en A 1.04 '1030 Bth.St. NE
Fenster/Gleen Rive�Access '12.58 'I0502 Pubum Black Diamontl Road
F/y�in Lion Pa�k 0.02 '107 �5fh St. NE
Go/f Couise '139.7'I 29630 Green Riser Road SE
Mountain ViewCemetery 60.00 2020 Mountain Vew Dr.
O/son Canyon Farmsfead 20.00 �28728�Green Ri�er Road
PioneerCemetery 0.76 802.AubumWayN,
P/aza Park O.'19 2 West Main St.
S/aughferMemorial 0.02 2988AubumWayN.
Tota/ Specia/ Use A2as 254.38
Proposed Capac/tv Proiects:
None -
Tota/ Proposed Capeclty Piojects -
202'1 ProJeeted Inventory Total
�- S acial Use Areas- 254.38
Open Space Areas �'- -- - � - � �
Exlstlnp/nventorv:
Aubum Environmental Perk Open Space �90:9� ai3 Western A�.e.NW
Gark Property 26.68 TBD
Game Farm Open Space ¢6�.00. 3030 R St.SE
Go/f Course Open Space 40.98 29630 Grean Ri�rer Road SE
Lake/and Hills Nature Area 46.07 500 t82nd A�.e.S
Olson Cenynn Open Space 47.00 28729 Green Ri�.er Road
�West Aubum Lake _ 9:25 32054 58th A"s.S
Fota/ Open Space Areas � 386:89�
Proposed CapacityProlects:
None -
Total Proposed Capacity Projects -
, 2021 Projeeted Inventory Total
-_O en_S aee Areas- 386.89
1�1
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
__ _ _
PARKS, ARTS and RECREATION
(Municipal Parks Consfrucfion Fund)
2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 2021 TaRal
CapackyProlects: .
1 Park AcquisitlonslDevelopmeM
Capital Costs - 125,000 125,000 125,000 - - 375,000
Funding Souroes:
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
GrentS jFed,Sfate�,Local) -. - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - -
KCProp:2_ _. _ _ _ . _.__._ __ _._.125,000 125,000 125,000 - - 375,000
SuMotal,Capacity ProJects:
CapitalCosts - 125�,000 125,000 125,000 - - �375,000
Non-Capaclty Proleets:
2 Isaac Evans Park
CapiplCosts 100,000 - - - - - 100,000
Funding.Sources:
Fund.Balance 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
GranLs(Fed,State,Locap - - - - - - -
Other{ParklmpactFee) 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
3 Jacobsen Tree Farm Ske Plan
Capital Costs - 12,000,000 - - - - �12,000,000
Furidirig Souroes:
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
G2nis(Fed;Slate,Local) - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000
Oth'er(DeyelopeY) - 4,000;000 - - - - 4,000,000
Bond Pmceeds - 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000_
4 AubumCommunityandYouth/TeenCe�nter
Capital Costs 5,100,000 - - - - - 5,100,000
Funding Sources:.
REET 1 759,219 - - - - -� Z59,219
Other 2;340,781 - 2,340,781 �
Grantis�(Fed;State,Local) 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000
5 Les Gove Park ImprovemeMs
Eapital Costs 260,000 - - - - - 260,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
Grents (Fed,State,Loral) - - - - - - -
KC Prop 2, 260,000 - - - - - 260,000
6 Rota"ryParklmprovemeMs
Gapital Costs - 30,000 30,000 - - - 60;000
Fun:ding Sources:
Fund Balance - 30,000 30,000 - - - 60A00
Granis(Fed,State,Local) - - - - - - -
Other - - - -
172
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-2 (continued)
2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 2021 Total
Non�CaoaciN Proiects:
7 Miscellaneous Parks Improvemerrts
Capifal Costs 300,000 175,000 175�,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,175,000
Funding Sou�ces:
. Fund Balance - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125;000
Grants (Feii,Slate,Locaq 50,000 75,000 75;000 75,000 75,000 75,000 425�,000
REET2 200,000 - - - - - 200,000
Other(Park Impact Fee) 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 425,000
8 Cameron Park
Capifal CosLs - - - 55,000 - - 55,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - - - 25,000 - - �25,000
Grants (Fed,Sfate,Local) - - - 30,000 - - 30;000
Other - -� - - - - -
9 Game Farm Park ImprovemeMs
Capital Costs - 40,000 - - - - 40,000
Funding Sources:
Funii Balance - 40,000 - - - - 40,000
GranLs(Fed,State,Local) - - - - - - .
Other - - - - - - -
10 Geines Park
Capihal Cosfs - 35,000 - - - - 35,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - 35,000 - - - - 35,000
Granls(Fed,State,Local) - - - - - - _
Other - - - - -
11 RoegnerPark
Gapihal Costs - 50,000 - - - - 50,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - 50,000 - - - -� 50,000
Grants(Fed,Spte,Locaq - - - - - - -
KC ProP 2 - - - - - - -
12 Auburndale Park
Capital Cosis 25,000 - 350,000 - - - 375,000
FunHing Sources:
Fund Balance 25,000 - - - - - 25,000
KC Prop 2 - - 100,000� - - - 100,000
Other.(ParklmpactFee) - - 250,000 - - - 250,000
13 Auburndsle Park II
Capihal�CosS - - 575,000 - - - 575,000
Funding Sources:
Fund�Balance - - - - - _ _.
GranLs (Fed,State,Local) - - - - - - .
Other - - 575,000, - - - 575,000
14 SunsetPark
Capifal Cosk 365,000 - - - - - 385,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance • - - - - _ .
Other(Park Impact Fee) 185,000 - - - - - 185,000
Other(Contributions) 200,000 - - - - - 200,000
173
City of Auburn Draft Capita!Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-2(continued)
_ _ _
2016 2017 2018 2019 20Z0 2021 Toql
Non-Cabacity Prolacts:
15 BPATPaiI onlea Hill
Capital Cosis - - - - 150,000 - 150,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balance - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local) - - - - 150,OOb - 150A00
KC Prop 2 - - -
__ - - -- -- - - - __
16 Lakeland Park#4
Capital Costs - 25,000 150,000 - - - 17¢,000
Funding Sources:
Fund Balarice - 25,000 - - - - 25,000
Other - - 150,000 - - - 150,000
SubtotaL Nm-Capacitv Proiects:
CapitalCosts 6,770A00 12,355,000 7;280,000 230,000 325,000 775,000 20;535,000
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
CapaciryProjects - 125,000 125,000 125,000 - - 375,000
Non,CapacityProjecLs 6,170,000 12,355,000_ _1,280,000_ _ 230,000_ . 325,000__ _ 175,0.0.0__20;535,000_
TotalCosfs 6,770,000 12,480,000 1p05,000 355,000 325;000 175,000 20;910,000
RINDING SOURC6:
Fund Balance 75,000 205,000 55,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 435;000
GranS(Fed,Slate,Local) 2,050,000 2,075,000 75,000 105,000 225,000 75,000 4,605;000
REET1 759219 - - - - - 759219
REET2 200,000 - - - - - 200,000
Bond Proceeds - 6,000,000 - - - - 6,000,000
KC Prop 2 26D,000 125,000 225,000 125,000 - - 735;000
Other-Parks Impact 285,000 75,000 325,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 910,000
Other 2,540,78]. _ 4,000,000_ 725,000 ___ - - _ __-_ _. 7,265,78]
TotafFunding 6;170;000 72,480,000 1,405;000 355,000 325;000 175,000 30,970,000
174
City of Auburn Draft Capital F'acilities Plan
- - -
- -- -
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Faciiities elan
� �Six Year Capkal Facilities PWn,2016-2021 Capital Projeots Fund
ProjectT�tle: Park Acquisitions/Development
Project No: CpXXXX .
ProjectType: CapaCity
Project Mariager: Daryl Faber
- Description:
Land acquisidoru to occur based on demand and deficiencies including parks,open space,trails and cortidors.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget: �� - � ---
None
Activity:. - . .. . . . . . ._
(PreNous 2 Vrs.) 2075 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSources _Priorto.2015 _E9lmatie 20168udgat. 2077.Butl et ProeifTofal.
Fund 327-Unrastticted Furrd Balance - - - � � -_ �-— - -
Grants-Secured(Fed,Sfafe,Local) - - - - _
Hontl ProCeedS ' - ' - '
Caeneral Fund Tians)er In - - - - -
KC Pmp 2 23.914 46,414 125,000_ _70,328.
Total Funtling Source� 23,814 46,414 - 125,000 70,328
Capital EzpendiNros
. . _ Deslgn ' _ ' ' '
Acquisltion 23,914 46,414 - 725,000 70,328
Conshuctlon
Total F�pendiWres 23,914 46,d1d - 125,000 70,328
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
roml
2018 2079_ _ 2020 2027 _ .20162027
Funding Swrces �' � -
FurM 321 -UnresWcted Fund Balance - - - - _
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - _
. . Bond Proceeds ' - - '
Geneia/Fund Trans/er/n - - - _
KC Prop 2 125,000. 125,000 375.000
Total Funding Swirces 125,000 125,000 - - 375,000
Capltal Expenditure&
. . . Des/gn ' " _
Acquisitlon 125,000 125,000 - - 375,000
ConstrocNon
Total ExpenillNies 125,000 125,000 �-� - 375,000
175
City ofAuburn Draft CapitaZFacilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capitat Facilities Plan
Six Year CapifalFacilities Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects-Fuod -
ProjectTitle: Isaac Evans Park
Project No: gpbd07
ProjectType; Non-Capacity
Projeot Manager pa[yl Faber
Description:
Repairtrail.tlirougFioutpaik,improve�playgrourid and de�elop reforestation.plan.
Progress Summary:
None
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Increased mowing and utilities-$6,000
Activky:
2015 YE 2U18 7ear End
Funtling Sources Prfor o0 2015 ESimate 2016 BudOet .2077 BuAget ProjeetTotal
Fund 321-Uniestnctetl Fund Balance - - 50,000 - 50,000
Grants-Securad(Fed;Sfa[e,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Otlrer(Park ImPact Fee)' . ._ ._.-____ _ . r _ 50,000_ _______ _ _ 50,000
Total.Funding Sourees: -� - 100,000� - 100,000
. . ._. . . . ._ . . __
CaplfafExpenditures
Design - - 70,000 - 10,000
Right.ofWay - - - - -
ConStniLf(On 90,000 90.000
Tofal6cpendifures - - 100,000 - 100,000
Forecasted Projgot Cost:
... . . . -. Tofnl
2018 2079 2020 2021 207&2021
FunAing Saircex
Fund 321-Unrestncted Fund Ba(ance - - - - �50,000
Grants-Secured(Fed.Stare.Locaq ' ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Othe�(Park ImpactFeeJ• ' ' .. -. _._ . :__ . _.__ _ ._�,50,000.
TotafFundingSourcex - - - - � = 100,000
Capital�Expendlttires
Desr9n ' ' ' ' 10,000
RighbolWaY� - ' ' ' '
Conshuction 90,000
Toml�Fiipendi4�rex - - . - - 10D.000
176
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- _ _ . _ _
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capita�Faci�k�es Plan
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 CapitalProjects Fund
ProjectTine: Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan
Project No: cp0609
Pro)eaType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Daryl Faber
Descrlption:
Implemerrt Master Plan for the de�lopmerrt of this 31 acre site. Lea Hill area is deficient in park ac2age.
Prog�ess Summaryi -
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No significant impact due to master pian. Future park de�.elopmentwill.resWt in maintenance and�uGlity e�enses
undetertninable at this time.
� Actlyity: � - � - - - �� - - -
ZO'IS YE� 2016 Year End
PundingSources PriorW2015 Estimate . 20168udget. ..201ZButlget ProJectTOTaI_
Furid321-UnresMcfetlfuiidBa/ance 25,321 - - � �-� '25;321
Grants-Unsecuretl(Fed;State,Local) - - - 2,000,000 -
BonCProceeds - - - 6,000,000 -
REET - - - - -
O[her(Dees(opment) 4,000;000
Total Funding Sourcex 25,321 - - 72.000,000 25,321
Capltal Expenditures
Des/gn 25,321 - - 1,000,000 25,321
Right o(lNay - - - - _
ConSfNCf%On 11,000,000
Total F�cpentllWres 25,321 - . 12,000,000 25,321
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 '2019 2020 _ 202L_ . 2076-2021
Funding Sourcas � �
Funtl 321-UnresMcled Fund Balance - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - - - .- 2,000,000
Bond P�oceeds - - - - 6,000,000
REET - _ _ _ _
0t1rer(Oe�slopment) - 4,000,000
Tofal Funding Sources - - - - 12,000,000
Capital Expentlltures
Design ' ' _ _ 1�000�000
RigM ot Way - - - - _
Construction 11,000,000
Tofal Expenditures ' ' ' ' " �12.000,000
177
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _. - - - _
----- ------ —- — - -- - - --- - - - -
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (32_1.) Capital Fac�lities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2076-2021 CapitalProjects�.Fund
Projectrtie: Auburn Community and Yo.uth/Teen Center
Project No: Cp1412
Projectrype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Jacob Sweeting
Descriptiori:
Construct a new appropmatey 13,OOOsq.ft Community Cerrter facilily as well as repurpose the existing Parks,Recreation
and Arts AdministraUonbuilding iMo a YouthlTeen Center. The projec4 includes sitelmprovemeMs associated with the
construction at Les Gove Campus and administrative spaae for ttie Parics Department,meeting,aqtivity and fitriess space
as well as a dedicated ynupVteen ceMer. The State hasallocated$3million of itia capital budget to tFie City to ftmd the
_. _.
pmject.
Progress Summary':
Design in 2014&2015,tiid and begin construction in 2015 with construcfion completed in 2016.
Future lmpaaf on-Operating"'Budgetc
The annual operating budget fiscal impact is estimated to be$150,000
Activky:
2013 YE 2Ih6 Year.End
FundlnBSourties PAorto2075 Eetlmete 20�8�BuEget 20778utlget Projeet7o�l
Fund 321-UnresMcfedFurM Belence 5,294 - - - 5,294
GreMs-Secured-S[ete -� 7,000,000 2,000,000 - 3,000,000
REET 7 133,944 560,762 759.219 - 1,453,925
Other(SoOd.Waste Fees) - - - - -
Other - 2,200,000 2,340;781 - 4,540,781
TofelPundingSourcea 139,238 3,760,782 5,100,000 - 9,000,000
Caplfal:ExpendiNres
Property.Acquisitlon - - - -
Deslgn 139,238 1,789,162 - - 1�,928,400
Demolltian - ' ' ' '
Construction - 1,971,600 5,100,000 - 7,071,600
TotafExpanditures 138,238 3,780,T82 � -5,100,000"-""- ----�" - 8,000,000�
Forecasted Project Cost:
7oa�
2078 .2018_ 2020._____ ___2021__.. __ _101fi2027__. _
Funding Sourcex
FunO 321-Unrastticted FurM Aalance - - - - -
Grents-SecuredSfate - - - - �2,000,000�
REET 1 - - - - 759,219
Other(Shcd Weste Fees) - - - - -
Other ' ' ' ' 2.340,781
Tofal Fundlnp Sources - - - - 5,100,000
Capital Fiipanditirec:
PiopertyAcquisition - - - - -
Desl9n _ ' ' ' _
Professlonel Services - - - - -
Constnic(ion - 5;100,000.
Total ExpsndlNras ' ' " ' S.70D.000
_.. .__. ..__—_—_—___ . . _ _ .. .
Grants/Other Sournes: Washington;State capital budgeYappmpriatioqthrough.the DepaRmeM otCommeree
178
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capua�Facilities e�an
Six Year Capital.Facilities Plan,:2016-2021 Capital Projecb Fund
ProjectTine: Les Gove Park Improvements
Project No: cp1510
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
Description:
Based on"to be completed"Les Gow Master Plan,design and implemerrt reoommendations Vat will inorease user safety,
encourage public use ard community cormectiviry.
Progre"ss Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:� � � �
$5,000 Utilities
Activity: � - -
�2015 YE� 2016 Year End
Funding Source� .Prior to2015 Ltlmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget -Projeet Total
FurM 321-Unrestncted Fund Balence � � - � - - _ �- � � - - _
Granfs8ecured(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - - _
Bond Proceetls - - - _ _
OthervTrens/er/n - 36,000 - - 38,000
KC Pmp 2 40.000. . 260,000 300,000
Total Fundfng Soureea - 76,000 260,000 - " �" �-'336;000
Caplfal F�cpentlltures
De,aign - 22,498 10,000 - 32,498
Right of�Way - _ _ _
. ConstrucNon 53,502 250,000 __..303.502
Total Expentlitures - 76,000 260,000 - 33B;000
Forecasted Project Cost:
_ .__. ..-_
ropl
_. 2078_ .2019 2020 2021 20162021
Funtling Sourees � � �
Fund 321-tlnrestrictetl FurM Ba/ance - - _ _ _
Grants-Secured(Fed,Sfate,Loca!) - - - _ _
Bontl Proceeds ' - ' ' _
OthervTrans/ei/n - - - _ _
KC Prop 2 260,000
Tofal Funtling Sources - - • - �- 260,000
Capltal Expenditures
Deslgn - ' ' ' 10.000
RigM o/Way ' ' ' ' '
ConsWction - 250,000
Total Ezpenditurex ' ' ' ' Mp.Opp
179
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Gapiw�Fac�in�es eian
Six Year Capkal.Facilitfes Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projecfs Fund
ProjectTine: Rotary Pack Improvements
ProjectNo: CpXlcx.x
erojectrype: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Faber
De§pription; — --
Coordiriate impro�ements with neighborhood and Rofary Club of Aubum to add walking path.
Progress�Summary:�
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
None .
— -_
Actiyity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
. .- . _ . _ . .. .. .....
Funtling Sources:'. PHor to 2015 Estlmate 2016 Budgat 2017 Budget Pro'ect Total
Fund 321 LniesMc[ed FurM.Belalice. - - -. 30;D00 -
Grants-Securetl(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - �- - - -
REET - �- - - -
Other
Tofal Funtling Sourcea: - = . ..' —'� _ ' �'- ' -70.000'. - . ".....: - '"-.
Capital ExPentliWies:
_ Desl9n ' _ ' 5.000 -
R/ght of Way - - - - -
Consbuctiwr 25,000
Total Expendltures: - �-� - '50.000 -
Forecasted�P�ojectCost: � � �
Totet
2018 2079 2020 2027 2016-2021
Fdnding Sources: .- _ _�._. _... _
Funtl321-UnresMctetl Fu�Balance 30,000 - - - 60,000
c�a�es-sac�red(r-ed,sre�e,co�a�� - - - - -
BorW Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Other
Totel Funding Sourcex 30,000 - - . 60.000
Capital ExpanAiWrex
Deslgn 5,000 - - - 10,000
RIgAt o/Way - - - - -
ConsWctlon 25,000 50,000
Tofal F�cpendiWrex 30,000 - - - 60.000 �
i8�
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND(321) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capffal Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects Fund
Projectrve: Miscella�eous Parks Improvements
Project No: gpbd03
Project7ype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
Description:�
Minor park improJemeMs including�shefters,roofs,playgrounds,irrigatlon and restrooms.
Progress Summary:
Futu�e Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 YE 2076 Year End
Punding Sources: Prior W 2015_ .EsHriiafe. 2016 Butlget 2017 Budget ProjectTotal
Fund 327 Lnrestdcted Funtl.Balance - - - 25;ppp - - -� -- - _
Gren(s-UnsecuietlState - 50,000 50,000 75,000 100,000
BaM Proceeds " " " ' "
REET 2 - - 200,000 - 200,000
Other(Park Impact Fee)' 10,922 . . 35,400. 50,000 75,000 96,322
Tofal Funding Sources: 10,922 85,400 300,000 175,000 � " " "396,322
Capiql F�cDendih�rex
Pro(e55ional5ervlces - .- 200.000 - 200,000
Righto/Way - - - _ �_
Constructlon 10,922 85,400 100.000 _ 175.000 196.322
Tobl Expentllhirex 70,971 85,400 300,000 775,000 '398;322
Forecasted Project Cost:
Toml
2076 2079 2020 2021 201&21127
Funding Sources
FurM 321 LnrestriUed FurM 6alance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
GrarRs-Unsecured.Sta[e 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 425,000
Bond Proceeds - - - -- � � _
REET 2 - - - - 200,000
Other(Park lmpact Fee)' 75,000 75;000 �5,000 75,000 425,000.
Total Funding Souroes 775,000 775,000 175,000 175,000 1�,175,000
Capifal Ezpenditurex
Prolessiona/SeMces ' ' ' ' 200,000
Right oi Way - - - - _
Constmction 175,000 175,000 175,000 _175,000, 975,000
Total FspentliWrea 175,000 775,000 175,000 175,000 1,775,000-
igi
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
--- -- --
11AUNIGIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Vear Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 _ . . ._ _ . . —. .____ _ _ .__ Capital:Projects Fund
ProjeaTiae: Cameron Park
Project No: cpxxxx
ProJectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Faber
Deserlptlon:
This project will impro4e ttie pedestrian trail and add landscape and fencing to sene as b�hFer to the neighbortwod and
play slrucWre. This project is ider�lified in the Parks ImprovemeM Plan.
Progress Summary: _
Future Impact on:Operating Budget:�
IJone
- - -
Activky:
2075 YE 2016 Vear EnA
FunHing Sourees Prlor to 2015 Estimate 2016 Bud et 2017 Budget Pro eet Totel
Furrd 321-Uniastticted.Fund Balance - - - - -
Orants-Unsecured(Fed,State;Local) - - - - -
Aond Proceeds - ' ' ' '
REET - - - - -
Othe�
TotalPunHinO Sourcec� � � - - ' ' ' " -"`-' -' -. _ .. -. .
Capital F�pentlih�res
_ Design _ ' ' ' . _
Right of Way - - - - -
ConsUuctlon -
Total'.Ficpandituros. ' ' ' ' '
_ _'_' _ _' _ _
F.oreca§ted Project Cost:
_
rom�
2018 2(H9 2020 2021 20162021
Funding Sdirce�
FmM�321�-UniesfictedFurid�Balance - 25,000 - - 25,000
Orants-Unsecured(Fetl;State,Locel) - 30,000 - - �30,000
� Bo�M Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
ONrer
Tofal Funding Sourcea - 55,000 - - SS,000�
Capifal:Expenditures
Deslgn - 5,000 - - 5,000
Rlght o/Way - - - -
ConsWc[ion - 50,000 50.000
Total Expenditures - 55,000 - - 55,000
I82
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ - -- -
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capttal FacilKies Pian
Six Year Capital Facilities PIan,2016-2021 Capital Projects:Fund
ProjectTitle: Game Farm Park Improvements
ProjectNo: cpxxux
� ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: Faber
Description:
Unproye irrterior ligh6rx,7 and pafhways arid proyde access from the newly acquired property on southwest aome�of ihe
park.
Progress Summary:
Future Impayt on Operating Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 YE 2(H6 Year End
Funding Sources PAor b 2015 Estimate 2018 Budeet 2017 Budget Project Totel
FurM 321-Unrestric[ed Furxi Balance - - - 40,000 40,000
Grants-Secured(Fetl,State,Local) - - - - -
. Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Ofher
Total Funding Sourcea: - - 40;000 40.000
Capital Expenditures:
Des/gn ' ' ' ' '
Righf of Way - - - - -
ConsVuctfon 40.000
Tofnl Eupentliturea - . .._� - �'-. . .. 40.000� '
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 10t8 2020 2027 20162021
Funding Sources:
Fund 321-UnresMcfed Fuird Balarrce - - - - 40,000�
Gwnts-Secured(Fad;State,Loceq - - _ _ � �_
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -.
Othe�
Total Funding Sources "" - �� � � - - - 40,000
CapiTal Fxpenditures:
Design - - ' - '
Riglito/Way - -. - - _
ConsWCtion 40,000
� - Total Expenditures - - - - 40,000
183
City ofAuliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ _ _- —_: . -- -
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capihal Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilides Rlan,2016-2021 Capital Frojecffi Fund
ProjectTitle: Gaines Park
Project Na cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Projec4Manager. Faber
Descriptlon;- - -
Devslop HorUcutture Plan for the Park as indicated in the Parksimprowment Plan and repair boardwalk.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
_
AeHvHy:
2075 VE� 21N6 Year End
Funding�.5ources PAor to 20t5 Estimate 2076Bud at .2017 Budgat Bro ectTotel
Fund321-UnrastricfedFurMBalance . . .=" . -. ."". . -. ..- ---�--- --�-"�—"35.000- -.. .. .. ---'.".
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceetls - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Other - _. .._ -
_ _ -_. _ . __ . __ _ __ ____ .
Tofal Funding�Sources - - - '35,000 -
Capital ExpanEiturex
Deslgn - - " 10.000 -
Rlght o/WaY ' ' ' ' '
ConsWctlon 25;000
Total Expendldirex ' ' ' �35,000 -
Forecasted-Project Cost
Tmal
20t6 . 2019._ _ _ 2020. ._. ___ _T027 .___ ____ .201&2021..__
Funding Soureax
Fund 321-UnresMIXed�Fund Balence - - - - 35,000
Grants-Secured(FeU,Sta[e,Lxal) - - - - -
�Boiid�Pmi�eeds ' ' ' ' '
REET - - - - -
Other
Totnl Funding Sources =. . _ . . " . _- - - �- ��- .=... ...--�" �---�35.000-
CePital Etpe�nGidiies:
Deslgn - - �- - 10,000
Right of Way " " " ' -
Conshucfion 25,000�
TotalExpendlw�es - . . - . - . � _. ._. . .35�000-
184
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-- --- -
MUNICIPAL PARK$ CONSTRUCTION FUND (321,) Cepital Facllities Plan
Six Year CapRal Facillties Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects�Eund
ProjectTiUe: Roegner Park
Project No: CpXXXX
PrqectType: Non-Capacity
Project Mariager: Febe�
Description:
This project will provide for trail system maiMenance, play structure replacement and riverb�ank statiilization.
Progress Summaryi
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: � � - -
None
Ac4NiFy: � �
2015 YE 2016 Year Entl
Funtling 5ources: Prlor to.2015 .Estimate 2016�Budget 201Z Butl et Pro ect.Total
Fund 321-Unrestticted Fund Ba/ance - -- � - -- � �50,000� " �� --�- -
Granfs-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - _
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
REET - - _ _ _
� Othe/(PioP Levy 2)
Total Funtling Sources - - - 50,000 -
CaPital Expenditures
. . .Design - - ' S,000 -
Right o/Way - - - - _
ConSfNC!!On 45,000
rwei�Pendiwres - - - 50,000 -
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Toml
2018 2079 2020 2021. _ . .201&2021 _
Funding So6ices -
Fund 32f-Unrestrlcted Fund Balance - - - - 50,000
Granfs--Secured(Fed;Sfate,Local) - - - - _
. . Bond Proceeds - " ' ' -
REET - - - _ _
Ofher(PmP Levy 2)
Total Funding Sources - - - - 5p,ppp
Caplfal EzpendlWres
Design ' ' ' - '
Right o/Way - - - - 5,000
ConsWc[ion
Total Fxpendiwres ' ' ' ' S.000
185
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Fac'ilifies Plan
_
SlxYear_CapitalFacilldes Plan,2016-2021 Capltal-.Projecffi;F_und
ProjectrUe; Aubumdale Park
ProjectNo: gpbd0l
ProjectType:. Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
Description:
De4elop�a Master Flan for the Park,insTall an irrigation system,new play structure and impro�e signage.
Progress Summary:
Future Impacfon�Ope�ating�Budget:- -� - - -- -- �- � ���- �� - � � —- � � ---
UtilRies would increase by$5,000
ActivHy:
2015VE 2016Year Entl
Funding Sourcex Prlor W�2015 EaTimate 2078Budgat 2017 Bud et. .Pro ect Totel
Fund 321-Unrestncted Fund Balence - = 25,000" � �� � - � �--25;000-
Gran[s-Securetl(Fetl,State,local) - - - . -
Bard Proteeds ' " ' " '
Other(Park ImpactFee) - - - - -
Other(KC Piop 2) � �
Tofel FunCinp Seueess - . .. .. - .. -- - ' 25:000__ . .. . : - -"- ._'25.000'
CapiplExpentliNres
Deslgn - - 25,000 - 25,000�
Rlght of WaY - ' - ' '
�CarsmlcNon
Total�Eipantlidiies - - 25,000 - 25,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
roai
2018 2079 2020 _ __2027.. _ .2076-Z027__ .
Funding Souroes -
FurM 321�-(/niesWcfed Fund Balance - - - - 25,000
Gran7s-.Secured(Fed;Sfate,LocaQ - - - • -
Bond Proceeds - - - • -
O[he�(Perk lmpact Fee) 250,000 - - - 250,000
Other(KC Prop 2) 100,000 - 100,000
Total Funding Sources� 350,000- - - - - _ - -"" � - -"" " - --375,000�
CaPkal Ezpenditiires:
Design - - - • 25,000
R/ghf ol Way - - �- - -
ConsWcfbn 350.000 350,000
Total ExPanditures 35U�000. . _ - .- __ - _ . _ . _. - 375,000�
186
Ci.ty ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ --
MUNIGIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capkal Facllities Blan,2016-2021 Capkal Projects Fund
ProjectTine: Auburndale Park 11
ProjectNo: gpbd05
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
Description:
Detielop a Master Plan in 2015; impro�,e the epsting trail�system and install signage and play structure.
Prog►ess�3ummary: � � � � �
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
Increased W lity costs of$2,000
Activily: - - - -
2015 VE. 2016 Year End
Fun0ing Sources Prlor ro 2015 ESlmam 2018 Budget 2077 Budget Project Total
FurW 327-Unrestr/cted Fund 8e/ance - -� - - -
Grents-�Secured(Fed;Sfete,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
REET - - - - -
Other TBD
Total Funding Sourcex - - - -
Cepitel F�cpenditures
. . ...Design ' ' ' ' "
Right 0l Way - - - - -
Cwrshvct/on
Total ExPendlWrec - . - -
Forecasted Project Cost:
romi
2018 2079 2020 2021 2016-2027
Funding Sourcea:
Fund 321-UnresMcted Fund Ba/ance - - - - -
Ca2nts-�Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
OtherTBD .575,000 575,000
Tofel Funding Sourcas: 575,000 - - - 575,000
Cepital ExpandiWrea
. .. . Des/qn 75,000 ' ' ' 75,000
Rlght o/Wey - - - - -
Conshuctlon 500,000 500,000
Totel F�cpentlitures 575,000 - - - 575,000
ig�
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS C.ONSTRUCTION FUND (321) CapkalFacilkiesPWn
Si�c�Year Capital Faoilities Plan,�2016-2021 Capital:Projects:Fund
ProjectTipe: Sunset Park
Project No: gpbd06
FrojeotType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Faber
Description'
E�and:playground area.to indude spray park and additional play activities. Coordinate improvemerds with service�club
and Lakeland Hills Homeovrners Association.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Increase.�n U6lities of$10,000 per�ar
-� -- . . . _ _._ . ..
Activky:
zOts YE 2ot8 Year End
Fundfng Sources Prlor m 2015 F�Imate .ZOtB Budget 2017 BuOget ProjectTotal '',
FurM 3Y1-Urnesfdcfed Fuiid Balaiioe - - - - - �
G2nts-Secured(Fed,S[ate,Local) - - - - -
Bond Praceeds - -
Park Impacf Fees - 15,000 185,000 - 200.OD0
Other-ConfifDutions 8�Donatlons - 200,000 200.000
Totel Fundln0 Sources . 15,000 385,000 - 400,000
Capifal FxpandiW'es
Deslgn - 15,000 - - 15;000
Rlght o/Way - - - _. _
Consiructlon :3&5:000 385,000
Tofal EzpandiWres - t5,000 365;000 -- �- - � -��400;000�
"�ForecesteH�P�oJectcost:" � � � � - � �
rom�
2078 2018 2020 P027 201&2021
Funding Sourees:
Fund.321-Unresttictetl Fund Balence - - - - -
Grants-Secured(Fed,Stete,local) - - - - -
Bond?roceetls - - - .
Park Impact,Fees - ' ' ' 185,000
Other-0onMbutlons 8 Donatlons 200.000
Tofal Funding Soureas - - - • 385,000
CaPifal Expenditurea �
Deslgn ' ' ' ' '
RlgFrf o)WBY ' - " ' '
ConshvcGon 385,000
7otal F�[pentllWres . - - - 365,000
igg
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capkal Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital FacGities Plan,2016-2027 Capital Projects Fund
ProjectTine: BPATrail on Lea Hill
ProjectNo: CpXXxX
ProjectType: Non-CapaClty
Project Manager. Faber
Descriptlon:
Develop a feasibility sWdy related to constructability of a pedestrian trail linking the Jacobsen Tree Fartn site to tfie�west
end of Lea Hill. This trail would follow fhe alignmerit of the Bonneville PowerAdministration(BPA)transmission�lines from
132nd to 108tli A�;enue SE. Construction would be in phases based on cbnstruchability.
Progress Summary: � � � - -
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 VE 2076 Year End
FunEing Sourcez Prior to 2015 Fstimam 20t6 Butlget 2017 Budget Project Total
Fund 321-UnresMcfed Funtl Balance - - - _. _
.Granfs-Unsecureo'(Stale RCO) _ _ _ _ _
� Bond Proceeds - - _ . _
REET _ _ _ _ _
Ofher(KC Prop. 2f
Total Funding Sources - _ _ . _
CaPital ExpenAiLrtes
Predesign - - - _ .
Design ' " ' - •
Crnstmction
7otal Expenditures ' ' ' ' "
Forecasted Project Cost: ��- -
Toml
2U78 P079 2020 2021 20762021
Funding Sources
FurM 321-UnrestHcted FurM Balance - _ _ _ _
Grants-Unsecured(State RCO) - - 150,000 - 150,000
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
REET - _ _ _ _
Other(KC Prop. 2)•
TotalFunding5ources - _ " �� - �� - � 150,000 - 150,000
Capltal ExPentlitures
Predesign - - 25,000 - 25,000
�es79n - - 125,000 - 125,000
ConsWction
romi���d�e,�� _ � - �so,000 � �so,000
189
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year_Capffal Facilitles Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects�.Fund
ProjectTiUe: Lakelaitd Park#4
Project No: CpXi[Xic
ProjectType; Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Fabe�
Descrlption:
Complete Master Plan to�include�the de�nelopmeM and construction of an ernrirorvnenhal community park. Trails,..fencing,
parking and visitor amenities are included in fhe project.
Progress Summaryi - -
Future Impact on Operating Budget:.
6icreased maintergnca costs of$5,000
ActNity: . .. _. ..
�� ZOts YE 2016 Year�Ena
Fuu0ing Sources Prlor W.2015 Estlmate 2076 Bud et 2017�Bud et ProjeetTotnl
Fund�321�-UnresMcted Fund Belence - - - 25,000 -
Qrants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
_ _. ..__ _ ._ . .- . _.
Bontl Proceeds - - - �• -
REET - - - - -
Other
Tofal Funding Sources. ' ' ' - '-' - 25.000� -- -�- - "' '_
CaPltel Fxpendltures:
Design - - - Z5.000 -
Rtght o/Way - - - - -
Constructlon -
Tofal.Fxpenditure.s - - � ' �� _ 25.000 -
Forecasted�Projeot Cost: . �
Total
2018 2079 2020 2021 207&2047
Fundfng Sourcex -
FuM 321-Unrestnc(et1 EurM.Balance - - - - 25,000
GraMs-Securetl(Fed,State,�Local) - - - -� -
Bund Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Other 150,000 150.000
roai Fy�di�9 so�.ces: �w,000 - - • ��s,aoo
Gpiml Expenditures
Design - - - - 25I000
Rfght of Way - - - - -
Cwistruction 150,000 760.000
Total ExpendlWrea: 150,000 �-� - - 775,000
190
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-3
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
PARKS, ARTS & RECREATION - MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION
Pro ect: 2077 2018 2019 2020 2027 2022 Total
1 Paik Aequlsltions $ - $ - $ - $ - $. - $ - $ -
:2 /ssae Evens Park 6,000 6,OU0 6�.000 6,000 6,000 6,000 36,000
3 JacobSen Tree Farm - - - - - - -
4 Aubum�CanmuNtyand 150,000 150,000 150�,000. �150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000
Youth?een Cerrter . . . . .
5 LesGoveParklmp. 5,000 5,000 5,000 �5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
6 Rolary Paik trnprov. - - - - - - '
7 MrsrParklmpovemerrts - - - - - - -
6 CameYonPark - - - - - - -
9 Game Farm Park - - - - - -
70 Gaines Park - - - ' ' ' -
11 RoegneiPark - - - - - - '
7T Au6urndalePark - - 5,000 5�,000 5,000 5,000 20�,000.
13 AuburrMaleParkll - - 2,000 2,000 �2,000 2,000 8�,000
74 SmisetPark 10,000 70,000 10,000 10;000 10,000 10,000 60;000
15 BPA Troil Lea Nill - - - - - - -
16 LakelandPark#4 - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 �5,000 20,000
TOfal � S 171,000 S 171,000 S 183,000 S 183,000 S 183,000 S 183,000 5 7,074,000
191
City of Auburn Draft Cgpital Facilities Plan
GOMMUNITY AND YOUTHITEEN CENTER
_ _ .
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum currently does not have a Communi.ty and Youth/Teen Center:
Level of Service (LOS)
The City does not have a current LOS for a Community Center. The proposed LOS of 244.44
square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2021
projected citywide population of 85,912.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The proposed Community and Youth/Teen Center facility construction project will cost
approximately$9,000,000 and the project detail worksheet is p�esented on page 178.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
AsTable PR—3 shows;estimated operating budget impact of$900,000 is forecasted for the
Community and YouthlTeen Center Facil'ity during the six years 2017-2022.
TABLE PR-4 •
Facilities Inventory
Community and Youth/Teen Center
_ caPaanr
FACILITY (Square Feet) LOCATION
_ _
Existing Inverrtory.
Norie -
Total Existing Invenfory -
Proposed Capaciry Projects:
NewYouth/Teeri Center(Rem'odel) 7;300
NewCommunity Center 13;700
Total Proposed Capacity Projects 21;000
2021 Projected Inventory Total 21,OD0
192
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
SENIOR CENTER
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum currently has one Senior Centec Table PR-5 Facilities Inventory lists the
facility along with its current capacity and location.
Level ofService (LOS)
The cuPrent LOS of 154.43 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory
diviiied by the 2015 citywide population of 75,545. The proposed LOS of 135.80 spuare feet
per 1,q00 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2021 projected citytiride
population of 85,912.
Capifal Facilities Projects and Financing
The CFP does not include any senior center capital facilities projects during 2016-2021.
Impacf on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecasted forthe senior ceMerfacility during the six
years 2017—2022.
TABLE PR-5
Facilities Inventory
Senior Center
caaaan -
FACILITY (Square Feet) LOCATION.
Existing lnwntory: -
Senior Center 11,667 808 9th Street SE
Total E�sting In�ntay 11,667
Propased Capacity Projects:
None -
Total Proposed Capaciry Projects -
2021 Pro ected Invento Total 11,667
193
City of Auburn Draft Capita[Facilities Plan
� �
CITY OF � �
� _
� MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
194
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS
Current Facilities
The current inventory of Ci.ty govemment administration and operations facilitie"s include
194,015 square feet.for general government operations, 61,680 square feet for police services,
and 38,646 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 294,341 square feet. Tabie GM — 1
"Facilities Inventor�!' lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS of 3,895.98 square feet per 1,000 population is base.d on 4he existing inventory
divided by 4he 2015 citywide population of 75,545. The proposed LOS of 3,585.62 square feet
per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2021 projected citywide
population of 85,912.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The City's General Municipal Building facilities include four capital projects at a cost of
$1,075,000 and debt service at a cost of $3,945,850 for a fotal of $5,020,850. The projects
inciude (1) $150,000 for M8�0 Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements, (2) $500,000 for Eguipment
Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay (3) $320,000 for M&O Fuel Tank (4) $105,Q00 for M&O
Lunchroom expansion and $3,945,850 for City Hall Annex debt service costs. Table GM — 2
shows.the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
Jmpact on Future Operating Budgets
Operating budget irimpacts annually are not yet forecast for general municipal buildings during
the six years 2017—2022.
195
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE GM-7
Facilities Inventory
General Municipal Buildings
__
caPncirv
FACILITY (Square Feet)_ _ LOCATION
E�ostiiig In�nfay. _ ----- _
Generdl Go�mment:
City Hall 61,721 25 W Main Street
City Hall Annex 45,034 1 W Main Street
CltyMaintenance& Operations Facility 17,940 1305'C Street SW
HeirBuildings 15;246 Various
Municipal Court(Justice Center�leased to King Courrty) 12,200 340 E Main Street
,4ctivityCenter 10,074 910 9th Street SE
R Street Building 9,766 2840 Ri�,ervvalk Dri�e
Parks &Recreation Admin. Facility 7;804 910 9th Street SE
Aubum Valley Humane Society{Leased to AVHS) 5,900 491D A Street
GSA Building 5,580 2905'C Street SW#815
Street Waste Handling:Facifity 2,75Q 1305 C Street SW
Total 194,015
Police:
Gun range 32,880 1600 Block 15;h St NW
HeadquaRers{Justice Center) 24,800 340 E Main Street
GSA Building 1,000 2905 C Street SW#815
Seized Gehicle parking stalls 3;000, 2965 C Street S W
Tota6 6b;680
Fire:
Stations:
GSA Station#35 16,526 2905 C Sfreet SW
North Station#31 12;220 1101 D$treeYNE
Soufh Station#32 5,200 1951 R Street SE
Other Facifities:
NorthStation MainL Faclllty _4,700._ 1101 D Street NE'
Tota/ 38;646
Total Exisfing lnventory Z94;347
Pmposed Capaciry Pr�jects;
Community Center 13,700.
Total Pruposeo'Capagity Projects 13;700"
2021 Pro ected Invento Total 308,041
196
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE GM-2
CAPITAL FAGILITIES PLAN PROJECT$ AND FINANCING
GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Capacity Prolects:
None
Non-Capacity Prolects:
1 M&O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements
Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
Funding Sources:
Equip.Rental Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
2 EqulpmentRental Vehlele Maintenance Bay
Capital Costs 250,000 250,000 - - - - 500,000
Funding Sources:
Equip.Rental Fund 250,000 250,000 - - - - 500,000
3 M80 Fuel Tank RepfacemeM
Capital Costs 70,000 250,000 - - - - 320,000
FundingSauroes:
Equip.Rental Fund 70,000 250,000 - - - - 320,000._
4 IVI&O Lunchroom Expansion
Capital Costs 105,000 - - - - - 105,000
Funding Souroes:
Equip.Rental Fund 105,000 - - - - - 105,000_
5 Gty Hall Mnex
Long-Tertn Debt 657,750 658,400 658,150 657,100 658,200 656,250 3,945,850
Funding Sources:
Capital Improv.Fund - - - - - - -
REET1 657,750_ 658,400_._ 658,150 657,100 658,2�0 656250 3,94$,830
SubtMal,Non-Capackv Proiectr.
Capital Costs 575,000 500,000 - - 1,075,000
SUMMARY: -
CAPITAL�CUSTS
Non-CapacityProjects 575,000 50,0,000 - - - - 1,075,000
Long-Term Debt 657,750. _ _658,400 658,150 657,100__ 658,200 656,250 3,945,850
Total Costs 1,232,750 1,158,400 658,150 657,100 658;200 656,250 5,020;850
FUNDING SOURCES:
Ecjuip.Renfal Fund 575,000 500,000 - - - - 1,075,000
REET1 657,750 658,400 658,150 _657,100 658,20Q _656,250_ 3,945,850
Total Funding 1,232,750 1,158,400 658,150 657,100 656,200 656,250 5,020,650
197
City ofAuburn Draft Capztal Facilities Plan
-- -
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) CapitalFacilities Plan
Sbc Year,Capifal Faeililies Plan,;2016-2027 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTUe: M.&O Veh.icle Storage Bay Improvements
Project No: cp0711
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Randy Bailey
Description:
Enclose the 8 ezisting bays to provide necessary weather protection for street sy✓eepers,vactors,sanding,and snow plow '
equipmeM. ConsVuc4starage shed to facilitate removal of portable coMainers,improving space utiliiation and traffic flow
throughout b1B�0.
- _
Progress Summary:
FuWre:lmpact on Opereting Budgetc
- -- - - - - -- -_ ____
None
ACtiVity: - - -
� 2075 YE� 2016 Year.End
Funding Sourees PNor to�2075 F�imate 2016�Budget 2017 BudBeL ProjeQ Total
Urneshioted Equip.Rental Reeentie 5,451 W,000 150,000 - 205,451
Grants-Secured(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - - -
Other
TofalFunding�Sourcex 5,451 50;000 150,000 - -20i;45T
Capiml ExpentllWrex
� Design - - - - -
Right o%Way - - - ' -.
ConsWction 5,451 50,000 _ 150,000_ 205,451
jotalEgpendiWrea 5,451 50,000 150,000 - - -205;451�
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
Total
2018 2079 2020 3021 20162027
Funding Soureea
UrnesMcted Equlp. Renta6Reeenue - - • - 150,000�
Giants-Secuied(Fed;Stete;Local) - - �- �-� -
Other -
Total Funding�Soureesi - - �•� -� 150,000
CapHal ExpendiWres:
Des/9n - - - • -
Poght of Way - , - - -
CWIS�NCflOn - - �- 'ISO,OOO
Total ExpendiWres � - - - - � -- -�-- � - - � 150;000�
198
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) Capifal Facilities Plan
.Sbc Year Capital.Facilities Plan,:2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjeaTitle: Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay
ProjectNo: cp1223
Pro}ectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Randy Bailey
Description:
Build additional vehicle bay at Equipment Rental shop foF heavy equipment and large vehicles to�impro4e efficiency and remo4e
choke points. Pdding a large vehicle bay with a large vehicle lift will enable us to perform inspecGons and maiMenance on more
than one large vehicle at a time,this becomes eMremely important du�irg emergenoy operations such as snow and ice eyents.
The Ciry currently has 2.5 maintenance bays,this project will add one more maintenance bay for a total of 3.5 bays.
Progress Summary:
_. __
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 VE 2018 Year EnA
FunAing Soureea Prlor.m 2015 E4lmate 2016 Bud et 2017 BuA et Pro ed Toml
UnresMctedEquip.Rental Revenue "�� � " -29,276� �- �- � - -= - � 25D;000� 250,000 279.276
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,local) - - - �- -
Other -
TotalFundingSources: � 29,278 -" - 250,000 � �-250;000�"�--� 279,278
Capilal ExpendiWres:
Design - - -
R/ght oI WeY - - - .
Constn�ction 29,276 250,000 250,000 279.276
Total�FxpendiCircs 29,276 - 250,000 25�,OU0 Z79,278
Forec`astetl�ProJecfCost: � � � - � � � - � -
Tofal
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162027.
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 500,000
Grarrts-Sec�ied(Fed,Stffie,Local) - - - - -
Other - -
Total Funding Sourcex - - - - 500,000
Capital Expenditurex
De9i9n ' _ ' _ '
Right o/Way - - - - -
CO/IS�NC�IOII - .SOO,OOO
Tofal EzpentllWrec - - • - SOU,000
199
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
-- -- - --- - — - - _ _ _- - -
NAME OF FUND/DEPT Caprrya�Fac��ities P�an
- -
SixYear Capilal Facilkie§PWn,2016-2021 Enterprise.Fund§
Pro)ectTitle: M80 Fuel Tank Replacement
ProJecf No: dpXiUc�c
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Randy Bailey
- - - - ---- . ._- -- - -- -- �
Descrlptlon: - - -
_
Replace our three 10,000 gallon underground tanks with new above ground tanks.Our e�tisting tanks were installed in 1989 and
they are single wall;fiberglass tanks.The Citys cuRerit insurance carrmer will rio.t insure.these tanks once they b'ecome 25 years old
whichwill occur in 2014.The.ciry is bokng at other insu2nce options that may remove this�age resViction. tt will be a benefR to the
City to have the tanks above ground in the futura due to 4he reduced maiMenance�and inspecUon cost
Progress Sum'iiiary:
Future ImpacYon Operatfng Budget:
None
Aetivlly:
2075 YE ZO78 Year End
Funtling Sources Prlor to 2015 Estimate .2018Bud et 2017 Butlget. Pro aU Totel
Un�esMcted Equlp.Rental Re�enue - - 70;000 �250,000� 70,000
C3rents-Secured(Fed;State.Locel) "' " " ' '
Other
Totll FunCing Sources - - 70,000 �250,000 70,000
Caplfal FspendiWres
Design - - 70,000 - �0,000
� Right d WaY _ _ ' ' '
Constiuction - - 250.000
Total FicpendiWres - - 70,000 250,000 70,000
Forecasted ProjectCost
rota i
2018 2079 2020. 2021 . .20162021
Funding Sourees . . . . .- -- .- - .. .. __.._._.— -_ . _- ___ _ ._. _. ._
UnrestnctedEquip.Rental�Re�entie - - - - 320,000
Grants-Secmed(Ferl,State,Local) - - - - -
OMer -
Total Funding Soureac - - - - '320,000
Capital F�cpendiWrea.
.. Oesign - - . .- 70,000
Righ(.o/Wey ' ' ' ' '.
Conshuction 250,000
7oal F�zpentlloirec - - . - 320;000
2��
City of Auburn Draft Capitgl Facilities Plan
NAME OF FUND/DEPT Capital Facilkfes Plan
Six Year Capital Facilkles Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiee: M80 Lunchroom Expansion
Project No: Cpxxxx
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager: Ra�dy B0il6y
Description:
Expansion of the curreM lunchroom by redesigning the area to�accommodate Wl-Staff meetings,provide for a training faciliry,lunch
room�and also serve as the Departmerrt Operatioris Center(DOC)during an emergency eyent. In addition,the desgn would
include sliding doors which would allav the area to serve two purposes at once,foY example,one half of the room being used as a
DOC and.the other half open to employees to use as a IunctJbreak room.
Progress Summaryi
This ptpjectwill tie desigried and buiR in2015
Future Impact on Operetfng Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 YE. ?A18 Year End
FundingSources Priorto�2015 Eetimate _ __2016Budget._ .2017,.Bud et. .ProectTotal
Urnestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - 45,000 105,000 - _ - " -"�" -"150;000�
Grants-Secured(Fed,State,Loca/) - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources - 45,OOU 105,000 - 75U;000�
Capital F�cpenditl�rex
Design - 45.000 - - 45,000
R!g!i(o/Way _ ' _ - '
ConStNCNon 7OS,O00 1OS,O00
Total ExpenCiWres �� - 45;000 105,000 - 750,000�
Forecasted Project Cost:
rom�
2078 2019 2020 2021 20162027
Funding Sources
UrnesMcted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 105,000
G/snts-Secared(Fed,Stete,lxalJ - - - - -
Other - - - -
Total Funding Sourcea - - - - 705,000
Capital Expendi4�res:
Deslgn - - - - _
Rfght o/WaY - - ' ' -
ConStNLNon - 7p5,ppp
Total ExpendlWrea • - - - 105,000
2�1
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Faci.lities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital FacilRles Plan
Six Year Capifal,Facil_kies Plan,2016-2021 Capifal ProJects Fund
ProjectTipe: City Hall Annex
P(oject No:
Project Type:
Project Mariager.
Description:
To pay soheduled debt service costs on 2010 Gerieral Obligation borids issued for ttie City Flail Arinex.
__ - -- — __ _ _
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
AcWity:
(Preuous 2Nrs.) 2015 VE �2078 VearEnd
Funding Soureee: Prior M�2015 EsBmate 2018 Budget �2077 Budget ProJeetTofal
UnrusMcted Cep Improve - - - - -
Orarns-Securod�(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
REE71 1,290,000_ __ ___659,629._ . 65Z;750 658,400 2,807,379
TotalFundlnpSourees: 1.290.000 659.G19 657.750 658.400 2.607.579
Capltal Expenditurea
Desi9n ' _ ' " '
Construction - ' ' ' '
Long-Terrn_Debt$eryice 1,290,000 659,629 657,750 658,400 2,607i379
TotalExpendlG�res �� 1;290,000 - �� " " �659;629- - � 657,750" -- �858;400� - - �-- 2;607,379
Foreca5ted ProjeM Cost:
Tofal
2078 2079 2020 _2021 _ .20162021__
_
Funding Sourcex - . _ .. — - �-- — �- - -� - - - . .
Un,estrictedCep�lmpmw - - - - -
GreMs-Secuied(Fed,State,Local) - - - - •
�REfT 1 658,150 657,100. _ ._ 658,200. . __656,250- --. _.3.945.850
Totai Funding Sourcex 658,150 657,700 658,200 658,250 3,945,850
Capifel Expendituree:
Design - - - - ..
r.0I1SINC�i0l1 ' ' ' ' '
Long-Teim Debt Service 658,-150 657,100. 658,200 656,250 3.945,850
Total Ezpenditurex 658,150 657,100 658,200 656,250 3,943,650
2�2
City ofAubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
Current Facilities
Community Improvements include sidewalk and traffic signal improvements, neigliborhood
traffic calming program; public art and phase 2 of the Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk
project.
Level .o.f S.e.rvice (LOS)
No Level of Service for communi.ty improvement projects have been identified at this time.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The City's proposed Community Improvements include ten capital projects at a cost of
$4,389,070 and debYs.ervice at a cost of 1,3.35,600 for a total of$5,724,670. Table CI-2 shows
the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgefs
As Table CI-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $40,000 are forecasted for community
improvement facilities during the six years 2017-2022.
203
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE CI-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
2018 2017 2016 2019 2020 2021 Total
Non�Capacltv�P�olecfs:
7 Citywlde Sidewalk Repa_irs 8 lmprovemeMs
Capipl Costs 325,000 125,000 125,000 �125,000 125,000 125,000 950,000
Funding Sources:�
.. . . . . . . . . _. . ..
CapitallmprovamentFund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 750,000
REET2 200,000 • - - �- - 200,000
Grants(Fed�State,Local) �00,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
_.._ _ --------- --- -- . . _ . __ - - -
2. AnnualTreffk�SignallrnprovemerKs
Capital Costs � 175,000 175,000 175.000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
Funding�SouYoes:
Capifallmpm�ementFund - - - - - -
REET2. 175.000 175.000 175,000 175.000 175.000 175,000 7,050,000
3 Mohawks PWstics Site Mitigation;P�ojeet
Capital Cosis 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 - - 125,000
Funding'Souroes:
Capifallmpro�,ementFund - - - - - - -
Othe�(Funil124�-Trafficlmp.) �20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 - - 125,000
REET2 - - - -
._._ _... - --- �- ---- - - - _ . .. . . . -- ---
4 Nelghborhood Traffic Calming Program
CapIYalCosts �� � 100,000 �00,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding�Souices:
CapitallmprovementFund - - - - - . .
Granta - • - - • • -
REET2 100,000 100,000 700,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
5 Publfc Art
. . . . . . . .. . . _ _ ..
Capihal Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 18Q000
Funding Sources;
Capitallmpro�ementFund - - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000
B� CltyWetlanAMitigatfon_Projects
Capital CosLs - 20,790 7,694 7,694 Z,696 7,698. .51;570
Funding�Sources: .
CapifallmprotiementFund - - - - - - -
REET 7 - - - - - - -
Other(Fund 124-WetlanC fu5t) - 20,790 7,694 7�,694 Z,696 �7,696 57,570
.. _ _ _ _ ____ .. .- -- - � -� -
7 Auburn 6Mronme�rtal Park�Boardwalk-Phase 2.
Capital Cosfs 50,000 - 800,000 - - - B50,000
Funding�Saurces:
CapihallmprotiementFund - - - - - - -
REET2 50.000 - - - - - �50,000
Grants - - 550,000 - - - 550,000
Olher,To Be Detertnined__ _ - 250,000 - - - 250,000
8 Dowrrtown WayFnding Program
Capital Costs � 120,000 - - - - - 120,000
Funding Sources:
Caplfallmpro�.ementFund� • - • - - - -
REET2 - 120,000 - - - - - 720,000
204
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilzties Plan
TABLE CI-2 (continued)
2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Non-Caoacity Proiects: �
9 Green Wver Park�esign
.Capital GosS 37,500 - - - - - 37,500
Funding Sources:
CepifallmproeementFund - - - - - - -
REET2 37,500 - - - - • 37,500
70 Local Revkalaation
Long Term Debt 222,600 221,900 225,600 220,500 220,300 224,700 7,335,600
FunCing SouFces:
REET2 222,600 221,900 225,600 220,500 220,300 224,700 . 1�,335,600
11 Purehase King.CouMy Publie Heakh Buliding
Gapital�Cosls 425,000 - - - . - 425,000
Funtling Soutces: .
REET 1 425,000 - - - 425.000
Su6total.Non-CapaciN Proiects:
CapkalCosts 1,282,500 470,790 1,302,894 457,694 437,696 437,698 4,389,070
�SUMMARY: �
CAPITAL COSTS
GapaaryProjecLs - - - - - - -
Non•CapacilyProjecls 1,282,500 470,790 1,302,694 457,694 437,696 437,696 4�,389,070
Long-Term�Detit 222,600 221,900 225,600 220,500 220,300 224,700 1,335,600
Total Costs 7,505,700 692,690 1,528,294 678,194 657,998 662,396 5,724,670
Ft1NUING SOURCES:
Capitallmpro�.ementFund328 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 �25,000 150,000
Grants 100,000 700,000 650,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1750,000
REET 1 425,000 - - - - - 425,000
REET 2 935,'100. 526,900 530,600 525,500 525;300 529;700 3,573,'100
OlherTo Be Determined - - 250,000 - - - 250,000
Other(Fundt24-Trafficlmp.) 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 - - 125,000
Other(Fund 124-Wetland fv9t) - 20,790 7,694 7,694 7,696 7,696 51,570
Total Funding �1,505;100 � � 692�,690 7,528,294 678,194 657,996 882,396 5;724,670
20$
City ofAuburn Draft Capitgl Facilities Plan
_ _
CAPRAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Pian
Siz Year Capital Facilkies Plan;201&2021 Capifal_Projects Fund
Project Ttle: Citywide Sidewalk Repairs 8lmprovements TIP#32
Pmjec4No: Variou5
PiojectType: Non-Capacity(Mnual)
Pmject Manager. Jai Carter LOS Corridorip#rUA
Description:
Project fimds sidewalk improvemerds at mul6Ple locations throughout the City. A sidewalk imrentory was completed in
2004. Annual projecLs are selected based upon criteria such as:gap closure,safe walking routes to.schools,completion of
dowMown pedestrian cortidornr"linkage",connectiviiy to transit service,ADA requiremerds,and"$ave our Streets"(SOSj
projectlocations.
Progress Summary:
Fufure Impact on Opera4ing Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating tiudget for steet mairrtenance.
Aetivity:
2075 YE �2016 Yeai End
Funding5ources Prior_to.ZO7S�� F�atimate �20166udget .2017Budget Pro�edTWal
Fund�Balance - 147,493 25,000 25,000 172,493
G2nts-Unsecured State �- • 70D,000 100,000 100,000
... . . REET 2 - 20D,000 200,000 _ 400,000
Other - - - ' '
Total.Funding5ouroex • 347,493 325,000 125;000 672,493
Capifal EupendiW�es
Design - - 15;000 15,000 15,000
Right�Way - - -
Construct/on - 347,493 310,000 710,000 767;493
Toql 6cpendlNres: - 347;493� " - -325;000`- - �� �725;000� - - ����--"67�693
Forecasted Project Cost:
rotal
zo�e so�a zoso zozt zo+�mzr
Funding Sourcex � - -� �� - - �� �
Fund.Balance 25,000 25,000 �25,000 25,000 130,000
Grants-Unsecured State 700.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
REET2 - - - - �200,000
Other • - - -
Total Funding Sourcex 125,000 125,000 725;000 125,000 950,000
Capital Ez{iendiWrea
Design 75,000 15,000 15;000 15,000 90,000
Righ(of Way -
Conshuctlon 110,000 110,000 110;000 110,OU0 SBO,OOU
Total ExpendiNres 125,000 125,000 � 125,000 125,000 950,000
. __ ._. __.. _
206
City ofAuburn Draft Capital FacilitiesPlan
- - - — —
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year CapifalFacilities Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projeots Fund
Project Title: Annual Traffic Signal Replacement&Improvements TIP#34
Projed No: Various
Project Type: Non-Capacky(Annual)
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#NJA
_ _
Description:
This Project irioludes replacing traffic signal cabinets and equipment,video detection cameras and pedestrian pushbuttons.
This project will also make safety improvements to our signals including au�dliary heads and flashing yellow arrows,or
capaciry improvemerds such as righf-tum ovedap signals.The City uses current traffic coun4s and collision daia'to
determine the intersections to improve.
-
Progress Summary:
The project is ongoing and continues to successfully complete annual traffic signal improvement projects citywide.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating bLdget for street maintenance.
Activity:
2015 YE 21h6 Year End
Funding Sourees Prior to 2075 EsTlmate 2016 Bud et 20�7Bud et ProJeU Total
Fund Balance - • - - -
�ranfs-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) • - - - -
REET 2 - 220,800 775,000 175,000 395,800,
� Other - - � - -
TotalFunding5ourcex - �220,800 775,U00 " -775,000� - �-----�995;800-
Capifal ExpendiWrex
Design • - 25,000 25,000 25,000
RigM of Way - - - . .
Construction - 220,800 750,000 150,000 370,800
Total Ezpendi4�rea � - 220;800 775,000 �775,000 395,800
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tota I
2018 2079 2020 2021 2016�2027
Fuoding Sourees
Fund Balance - - - - -
G2nts-Unsecwed(Fed,State,Local) - - - - -
REET 2 175,000 175;000 175,000 775,000 1,050,000
Olher - ' -
TOUI Funding Sources 175,000 175,000 175,000 775,000 1,050,000
Capital E�ipendiWiex
Design P5,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000
Right of Way - - • - _
co�srNonor� �so,000 iso,000 ��o,000 �so,000 soo,000
Total Ezpendihires 775,D00 115,000 - 775,000�� � �"175,000�� � 9,050,000
2��
City ofAuburn Draft Capilal Facilities Plan
- _ . -- -
GAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Cap�fFayilities Plaq
Six Year Capital Facilkles Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects Fund
ProjectTtUe: Mohawks Plastics Site NGtigatfon Projeet TIP#13
Project No: cp0767
Project7ype; Non-Capacky
Projeqt Manager. Jeff DixoNMatt Larson LOS Coriidor ID#N/A
Descriptlon:
The proje.ct consists�of the design,coristruotion,maiidena'nce and monitonng�of approid_mately2,2-acres ofweUand
creation and�approidmately0.4-acresofwetland�enhancementwithin the�Goedecke South Properryowned bythe Sewer
Utility in orderto compensate for.approMmatery 1.6-acre weUarnl loss on:the.Mohawk Plastics property(Parcel#
1321049058). Theproject was approved under an ewsting agreement approyed�byResolution,No.4196,June 2007.
Progress'Summary:
The Ciry received the DOE WQ Certification,WDFW HPA,and on May 7,2009,the Arrny Corpsof Engineers(Corps)404
wetlanii-perrnit(NWS-2007-1913)., Subsequerrtly,bid specification"s arid construcUon plans were prepared antl
construction began in October2009. Construction wascompleted in January 2010 and�the projed is currenpywithin the 10-
yearmonitoring period,wliich irnrobes annual maiMenance,monitoring and reporting.
FutureJmpaet on�Opereting Budget:
tt is arrticipated.that armualmaintenance,monitoring and reporting on the perfo(mance ofthe wetland mitigationproject will
be requiYed for a period of 10 years,in conformance with pertnit requiremerrts. After the successfu6conclusion of Viis 10-
year monitoririg period,which is anticipated to be in December 2019;ongoing operation e�enses should�be minimal.
AcUvity:-- - - - - — - - � .. _ .
� 2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sour�es Prior W 2015 Eatlmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget Pm eeFTotel
Funtl Balance - - - - -
Grants-Securad(Fed;Stete,Local) - - - - -
ea�d Proceeds - - - -
TrafNclmpactFees 480,906 57,649 20,000 20,000 558;55B
REET�2 78,283 78;283
Total Funding Sources 559,189 57;869 20.000 �?A,ODO 638,838
Captlal F�cpentliWres:
. . Design 170,708 - -� - 170:706
Right of WaY - - '� ' '
, Constivction 368,483 57,649 20,000 20,000 468,132
Tofal ExpendlWres 559,789 � - - i7,649� -- � -"20,000- - ---'20;000�--�— �-638.838
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 .2021 20762027
FunAing Sourcex
FurM Balance - - - - -
cranrs-secu,ed(Fed,srare;t.ocaq - - - - -
Bontl Proceeds - - - -
Tra�c Impact Fees 65,000 20,000 - 125.000
REET 2 .. . _. . ..
ToTal Funding Sourees 65,000 -�� � 20,000" - "-� � _�-- " - -- --=- "- � 725,000
Caplfal Expendl4ues
_ Desi9n ' ' ' _ '
Rlght ol YYaY ' ' ' '
Constructlon 65.000 �20,000 125,000
Tofal Ezpondilures 65,000 20,000 - - 725,000
2�g
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital FacilRies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program TIP 1R33
P.roject No: gebd06
ProjectType: Non-Capacity(Mnual)
Project Manager. TBD
DescripGon:
This projectwill implemeM neighbortwod traffic calming strategies including street Iighting,speed cushions,signage,
speed 2dar signs,chicanes,traffic circles,and other approved traffic calming devices.Projects will be selected annually
based on neightiorhood meetings,public surveys,and engineering studies.
Progress Summary:
Future Irripact on Operating Budgef:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street mairrtenance.
Activity:
2015 YE� 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcer Prior to 2015 Estimate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget_ _Prqee!Total
Fund Balance - - • - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Loca/) - - • - -
REET 2 - 700,OW 100,000 100,000 �200,000
Other - -
Totel Funding Sourees - 700;000 700,000 t00,OD0 - � ���200;000�
Capilal ExpendlWres:
Design - - - - •
Right ol Way - - - - .
ConSWCtion - 100,000. _ 100,000 100,000 200,000�.
TotalExpandi�res - - 700,000� 100,000 100;000 "�- - -200;000�
Forecasted Project Cost:
Toql
2018 2018 2020 2021 20162021
Funding Sources
Fund Balence - - - - -
Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,loca/) - - - - -
REET 2 100,000 100,000 100,000 100;000 600,000�
Otirer - -
Total Funding Sourees 100,000 700,000 100;000� � 700,006 � � " 600,000�
Capital ExpendiWres
Desi9n - - - - -
Righto/Way • - - - -
ConStNCt(on 700,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Total Erzpenditures 100,000 100,000 700,000 100,000 60D,000
209
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _ _-- -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilkies Plan
Sbc Year Capifal�FaeitBies Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects Fund
ProjectTitle: PubllcArt
Projeot No: gcbd02
Project Type:
ProjectManager. K�uege�
Description•
The City designates$30,000 annualy roward the purchase of public art,Tor placemerrt at designated locations fhroughou[
the City.
Progress Summary:
Arts Commission will meet to assess fuWre needs and seek approval from City Council on placement
Futurelmpacton Operating Budget:
None
ACtivity: ._. . . . _ . .- -- -- -
2015 YE 2078 Yeer End
Funtling Sourcex Prlor to 2015 Estlmate . 2016 Bud et 207Z Butl et ._ Pro ecYSotal.
FurWBalence . _ . .22:000__ __._.. _ . .. _ _- _____.__. .��000..
Grants-.Secuiad(Fetl,Stete,Lncal) - - • - -
REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000.
Other - .. _ -_.._ _ ___.. . .. ____ _ . _._.__ . _ .
Total FullOing Sourcex 30,000 52,000 30,000 30,000 772,000.
Capital F�cpendiW res
Deslgn ' ' ' ' '
R/ghfo)Way ' - ' ' '
�Construction 30,000 52,000 30,000 30,000 162;000
Total Eipentliwres �30,000 52,000 30,000 30,000 172,000
Fo`reca'stetl Piqject Cost(
rotal
4018 2019 2020 �2021 201&2021
Funding Sourcea
FurM Balence - - - - -
GrerRs-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Local) - - - - -
REET 2 30,000 30,000 30;000 30,000 780,000.
Other
TomlFunAingBource6f 30,000 30,000 30,000�. �30,000 180,000
Capital ExpendiWrox
Desi9n - - ' ' -
wenra war - - - - •
Constnictfdn 30.000 30,000._ _�30,000_ _30,000.._ _ 180:000
Totnl FxpendiWros 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 �780,000
21�
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPffAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Faci�ities P�an
Sbc Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 � Capital Projects Fund
Project7ine: Clty Wetland Mitigation ProJeets
ProjectNo: cp1375
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Ande�sen
Descriptionc
This project designs and construats off-site wetland mitigation in ttie Aubum Erivironmerrtal Park for participating
development projects as approved through the Citysdevelopmerrt review process.Design,constrvction,monitoring,�and
mairrtenance ofthe mitigation is funded throughwetland mitigationfees collecfedbythe City.
Progress-Summary: � � �
ConstrucNon and mondorirg are orgoing.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: �
After construction,each wetland mitigation site is monitored and mairtlained for a period of three to ten years,depending
on the.specific requiremerrts fortha project.Ftinding for ftihire year monitoring and mairrtenance is inoludetl in the
developmerrtfees collected bythe City,�and is budgeted as part of the Capital Facilitles Plan.
Activily:
2075 YE�� 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcex .Prior to 2015 Estlmale 2016 Budget 20�7 Budget Pro eet Total
� FurM Balance "-� - - - - - �- = - -
Giants-Securad(Fed,State,Locap - - - - .
� Fmrdtt4WetlarrdMiNgetlonAccount 4,355 - 20;790 25,145
REET _
7otal Funding Souieea: 4,355 - - 20;790 25,145.
Capital ExpendlWroa
. . ._.Deslgn ' _ ' 4,000 4.000
R/ght W Wey - - - 12,090 72,090
Conshuction 4,355 4;700 4,700
Total ExpandiWrea 4,355 . 20,790 20,790
Foracasted Prqect Cost:
Total
2018 2019 2020 , 2027 . 2D16-2021
Funding Sources:
FuM Balance - - - - _
Grents-Secured(Fetl,Stete,local) - - - - _
Fund124.Wet/arMHfit/gat/onAccount 7,694 7,694 7,6% 7,698 51,570
REET -
Total Funding Sources: 7,694 7,694 7,688 7,696 51,570
Capital EfcpendlNres:
Deslqn ' ' ' ' 4.000
R/ghfolWay ' ' ' - 12,090
ConStNLt7on 7,694 7,694 7,696 7,696 30,780
TmalExpendlWrec. 7.684 7,696� 7.698 7.696� 51.570
211
City of Auburn Draft Capital F'acilities Plan
-- - _ _ --
--- ------ — - - - -- - - _
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facillties Plan
Six Year Capital Facillties Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projedts Fund
ProjectTiue: Aubum Endironmental Park Boardwalk- Phase 2
Project No: gCbd01
PcojeaType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Mde►Sen
Desoriptionc - - _ - - — - —
The Aubum Environmental Park(AEP).provides�vegetated natural open space within an urbanlzed area.The AEP provides
opportunities for local economic development,wa4er,qualiry improyement,storm waferdetention,flood con4rol,fish and wildl'rfe
enhancement,4isual.resources,public education,and passive recreation, includingGialking Vails anC bird viewing amenities.In
2012,the City completed the construction of approximately 1,200�lineal feet of the first phase(Phase 1)of an:elevated.boardwalk
trail in the Aubum Environmental Park:(AEP).This trail extended from West Main�Street throughsxlsting wetlands in the AEP
terminating at the tiase of the Bird Vlewing iower conshucted in 2009.As�part of the construction of tlie ele4ated tioardwalk;the
Ciry also installed interpretaGve signage,bench.seating,Ilmited new vehicle parking on 1Nestern Avenue and wer iwo acres of
wetiand species of trees,plants anil.sFirubs. Phase 2 of the elevated boardwalk trail would.construet a combinatiortof
approximately 2,OOO:lineal feet of surface trail and elevated boardwalk treil from the curreM tertninus at the Bird�Yewing��Tower to a
connection wtth the Interurban Trail.The Phase 2 project will further previous and current Councils'visions of the AEP providing
assive.recreatlon.anE.ernironmentai.education.o � Runkies.for all Aubum citiiens.. . _ _ _ _. ._._—___ _ ._ .._..
Progress Summary:
This is a new capital improvemeM proposal.
-- - � - -- - ..__. .._ __ _ . _. _. . . .
- - -� - -_ _. .__.
Fudire Impact on Operating Budget:
Construotion of the Phase 2 projeot is anticipated to incuY approximately$10,000 in annual operating costs to tAe Ciry"'s operating
budget.This.operating�cost is covered:in.epsting program improvementfunding for the Environmental Services portion of.the
Commun' 'Develo ment andPublic�.Works De��artment.bud' et.
Aetivity:
2075 YE 207fi Yeer ETd
Funding Sourcea Prlor to 2015 Esumafe 2018 Budget 2017 Budget Project Total
Funtl Belence - - - - -
Grants�-Unsecmed�Stafe - - - - -
REET 2 - 25,000 50,000 - 75,000
Ofhe�-TBD - - -
Totnl Funding Sourees: - 25,000 50,000 �-� 75,000,
Capital ExpendlWres
Oes/gn - 25,000 50,000 - 75:000
Rlght o/Way - - - - -
C.OfISiNCt%dl -
rorei�xae�dic,re: - zs,oao w;000 = - w;000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofal
2018 2079 2020 2027 201&2021
Fundlnp�5ources:
Fund Belence - - - - -
Grents-Unsecured State 550,000 - - - 550,000.
� REET2 - - - - 50,000�
Other-TBD 250,000 250,000�,
Tofal Funding�Soumec, BD0,000 - •� �- 850,000
Capital ExpenElWres
Design - - • - 50.000.
Righf o/WeY - - ' - '
Conshuetion 80U,000 - - - 800,000
- Totel EipendiWrea 800,000 - - - 850.000
212
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capita�Eaci�tties Plan
Six Year�.Capital Facilkles Plan,20162021 CapHal Projects Fund
ProjectTiue: Downtown Wayfinding Program
Project No: gcbd03
ProjeotType: Non-Gapacity
FrojectManager. Lauren Flemister
Description:
Phase�l: The downtown PedesVian Kiosks were de4eloped in 2012 as a resuR of additional funding being available through Local
Revital¢ation Financing. Nine locations were selected within Dowrrtown Aubum Tor a pedestrian kiosk to be constructed. W ith the
budget ayailable,three kiosks were constructed�in 2013 at the IMerurban Trail,Sound TransR.Plaza,and at 1st StreeUSouth
Division Street. Phase 1 proposes consVucdon of three additional kiosks in 2016. �
Phase 2: Develop an updated wayfinding program,both pedesVian andvehicular,that would inRially begin within Dowrrtown Aubum
tha[could tFien tie eaipanded Citywide. The current vehicular wayfindingprogram isJacking in aesthetic appeal,does not coordinate
with the vision tor powrrtown Aubum,and needs refreshing. A design arW cobr scheme have been established with the�peilesVian
kiosk design that an updated wayfindirg program can build upon.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Activity: _
2015 VE 2015 Year End
FundfngSourcex PAorto2015 EsUmate 2018Butlget 20176ud et ProectTotal
FurM Balance - - - - -
REET2 - - 120,000 - 120,000
Other -
TotalPunding Sources - - 720,000 - 30;000
Capifal EzpendiWres
Design - - 23,000 - 23,000�
Right o/way - - - - -
ConSINCIion 97,000 97,000�
Tofal ExpenAitures - - 120,000 - 720,000
FoFecasted Project Cost:
Total
2017 2078 2019 2020 201i2020
Funding Sources
Fund Balance - - - - -
REET 2 - ' ' ' 120.000
Ofher -
Total Funtling Sourees: - - - - 120,000�
Caplal Eupentlitures
Design ' ' ' ' 23,000
Right o(waY - - - - -
Conshuctirn - - g7,ppp
Tofal EzpendiWres ' ' ' ' 720.000
213
City of Auburn Drgft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL I_MPROVEMENT FUND (328) CapitalFacilRies Fian
Six Year CapitaLFacilkies,Plan,2016-2021 Capital Projects_Fund
ProjectTitle:. Green Riyer Fark Design
Project No: gcbd04
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Daryl Fabe�
Description:
This project provides funding to complete of a Green River Park Master Plan. The City has recently received,via a property Vansfer
from King CouMy and the State of W ashington,the riverfrorit property located along a bend in the Green River betuveen 102'nd and
104th Ave SE. These lwo parcels comprise an approximate 14 acre site,intended to be deVebped for public use. This futu�e park
continues more than 1,000 feet of water access. Mich of the property is subject to shoreline regulaUons as well as other
restrictlons. Community input is vdal M the bng-tertn vfsion and success of the property.
Progress Summary:
Futu�eirripact on Operating BuHgef:
No impack on the Parks Departrnent Operating Budget. The City's iunding of a ParkMaster Plan for this si[e is critical in an effort to
receive grant fundirig and can be a reimbursable expense should funding be ailocatetl for construction for the{iroposed park site.
Activity:
�� 2015 YE� 2076 Year End
Funding 9ources Prior to 2075 F3lmate 2078Budget 2017 Butlget Project.Total
Unrastricted Cep ImproJe - - - - -
Granfs=5ecuretl(Fed,State,Locaq - - - - -
REET2 - 37,500 37,500 �-� 75,000
Tofal Funding Sourees - 37,SD0 - - 3T,500� � - - "� � -� ��75,000�
Caplfal F�cpendi�res.
Design - - 37,500 - .37,500
QOOS�NCh011 - - - -� -
LOng-Temi Debt Service - 37,500 - - 37;500
Total Expendltiirex - 37,500 37,500 - 75,000�
Forecasted Project Cost:
rotal
2018 2019 Y02U 2021 Y0162U21
Funding Sourees.
UnresMcted Cep Improve - - - - -
Grants - - - �-� -
REET2 - - - .37;SW�
Total:Funtling Sourees - - - �-� '37,500.
Capltel Ezpe.ndiWres,
Design - - - • .37,500�
Constn�ction - - - • -
l.a'g'Term Debt Service - - - - -
Tofal FzpendlWrei - - �-� • 37;500
214
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ -- _ _ ----
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) capka�Fao��hiesP�an
Siz Year Capital FacilRies PWn;2016-2021 Capital Projects Fund
ProjectTi9e: Local Revitalization
Project.No:
Project Type;
Project Manager:
Description: -
To pay debt service costs on 2010 General Obligation bonds issued for the DowMown Promenade Improvemertls. Local
Revilal'¢ation financirg is a credit on the State's portion of sales tau that the City will receive through 2035.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
Activity:
(PreHoua 2 Yrs) 2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Soureea: Prlor M 2015 E4lmate 2078 Budget 2077 Budget Project 7oFal
UnresMcted Cap Impro�e - - - -
Grants-�Secured(Fed,State,LocaQ - - - - -
REET2 411,927 223,D73 222,600 227,900 857.600
Total Funding Souroes 411,927 223,073 222,800 221,900 857,800
Capifal E:PendiWrec
Design - - - - -
� Construction - - - - -
Lwg-Term Detit Seivice _.41],927.. _ 223,073. 222,600. 227,900 �857,600
Total,Expendi�rea 411,927 Y23,073 222,800 227,900" " - -- -857,600
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
. . 2078. .2019 2020 2021 207&2021
Funding Soureex �� �' - � � - - - �
Unreshicted Cap lmp�o�a - - - - -
Grants ' ' ' - '
REET 2 225,600 22U,500 220,300 224,700 1,335,600
Total Funding Sources -- -225,600 - 220,500 Z20,300 224,700 1;335,800
Capihl ExpendlWres
Design ' ' ' ' -
C�AnSfNCI%O!1 " " " - "
Long-Term Debt Service 225,600 220,500 220,300 224,700 1,335,600
Tofal ExpendiWrea: � " �.225,800� - "�--�.Z20,500 - 220,300 224,700 �7,335,600
215
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Fadlkies Plan
Stic Year Capifal Facflifies Plan,201��027 Capital Projects Fun"d
Projectrne: Purchase King County Public Health Building
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
FrojecfManager. TBD
DescripUon:
The Ciry has agreed to purchase the Kirg County Putilic Health Building from Kirig County fo_r redeyelopment purposes.
Progress Summary:.
This is a new capital improvemeM proposal.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
To be detertnined based:on erM use.
AGtiyity:
2075 YE Y078 Year End
Funding Sources: _ PAor to 2015_. .... _EstlmaLB 2076 Budget 207LBudget ProJect ToWI
UnrestrictedCap�lmpmye - - - -
Grents-Secured�(Fed,Sta(e,Local) - - - - � -
REET i ___ 425,000.__ _ .__ _ __._425.00D
Tofal Funding Sources: - - �425,000 - 425,000�
Capifal Eicpendidiree:
Lend - - 350,000 - ' 350,000
, Design . ._. � _ _. _
Constrvctlon �75,000 75,000
ToU.I ExpendlWrea - - 625,000 - 425,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tom�
2fM8 2019 2020 �2027 20162021
Funding Soureea
Unrestdcter/Cep�lmprove - - - - -
Grants - - - - -
REET 1 425,000
Tofal Funding Soureas -. - -� - � _ � 4Z5.000
Capital�EzpendiWres
Des79n - ' - ' 350�W0
Construction - - - - -
Consnucfion 75,000.
Total F�cpendlGire� - - �-� - 425,000
216
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE CI-3 �
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
Rroject: 2077 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
1 Cltywide Sidewalk Repalr 8
Improvement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
2 Annual Tra�c Signal
lmprovemeirts
3 Mohawks P/astics S1te
Mitigation - - - - - - -
4 NeighborHood Traffic
Calming Program - - - - - - -
S Public Art _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6 CityWeNandMltigallon
Projecfs - - - - - - -
7 AEP Boardwalk-Phase 2 _ _ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000
8 DowntownWayfinding _ _ _ _ _ _ _
9 Green River Park Design _ _ _ _ _ _ _
10 LocalRevltallzatfon
11 Piirctiase KCPH Bulld/ng - - - - - _ _
Total $ - g - $ 70,000 $ 10,000 $ 70,000 S 10,000 $ 40,000
217
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
� �
CIT'Y OF �
* .
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
218
City oJAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum operates the Auburn Municipal Airport, providing hangar and tie-down
facili4iesYleasing space for aircraft-related businesses.. As of 2012, there were approximately
96,036 take-offs and landings (aircraft operations) at the airport annually. Table A-1 "Facili4ies
Inventory" lists the facilities with current capacity and location. The Airport Master Plan was
completed in May 2015 for the period 2012 th�ough 2032.
Level of Service (LOS)
The Aubum Municipal Airport Master Plan provides a maximum runway capacity (LOS
standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annually; one take-off or landing equals one aircraft
operation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA
requires the airport to have the capital facilities capacity (i.e., runways, taziways, holding areas,
terminal, hangars, water/sewer system; etc:) necessary fo accommodate 100% of aircraft
operations during any one year. By 2022 4he Airport Master Plan forecasts the number of
operations to be 198,623—well below the capacity of the airport runway.
Capifal Facilities Projects and Financing
The City's AirPort facilities include eleven non-capacity capital projects at a cost of$ 8,078,650.
These projects include the runway enhancements project, west helicopter parking, facili4ies,
access road improve.ments and land acquisition for future approaches. Table A-2 shows the
proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating expens.e budget impacts forecast for the airport during the siz yeaFs
2017—2022.
TABLE A-1
Facilities Inventory
Airport
- - CAPACITY �
PACILITY #of A(rora$ - #of Feet LOCATION
Existlng Inventay:
Hangars 745 400 23rd Street NE
Tiedoii+rs 214 400 23rd Street NE
Air SMp 3,400 400 23M Street NE
Tota/Existirylmentory 359 3,400
Proposed Capacity Projects:
2020LendAcquisition 30 40023M Street NE�
2017RunKeyEztension - 718 40023rdStreetNE�.
TWaI Proposed Capacity Pro/ects 30 718
Y020 Pro'eeted Inve�ko Total 388 4,118
219
City of Aubum Drkft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE A-2
_ _
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
AIRPORT
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2027 Total
Capacitv Profects:
No�re .
Non�apacity Projects:
1 AlrpoR Security Camere&Oate Access Upgrades
Capital Costs - - - - 70,000 - 70,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - - 3�,500 - 3,500
Grant _ - - - - 66;500 - 66,500
2 Land Acquiskion for Futu�e Approaches
Capital�Costs - 420,000 - - - - 420,000
Funding Sources:
AiryortFund - 21,000 - - - - �21,000
Granis - 399,000 - - - - �399,000
3 RumvayEnhancements
CapitafCosis 140,000 1,064,000 - - - - 7,204,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund 7,000 53200 - - - - 60,200
Grants 133,000 1,010,800 - - - - 1,143,800
4 Automated Weather�Obsei4ation System
Capital�Costs - - - 268,800 - - 268,800
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - 13,440 - - �13,440
Grants - - - 255,360 - - 255,360
5 Fuel Farm
Capital Costs - 140,000 - - - - 140,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - 140.000 - - - -� 140,000
GranTs - - - - - - -
6 Land Acquisftion
Capital Costs - - - - - 4,429,810 4,428,870
Funding Sources:
AirportFund - - - - - 229,491 221,497
Grants - - - - - 4,208,319 4,208,319
7 Precisbn Ap{uoach Path Indicator(PAPI)for Runway
Capital Costs - - - - - 168,000 168,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - - - 8,400 SA00
Grants - - - - - 159,600 159,600
S WestSide.Fencing ,
Capital Costs - - - 52,920 - - 52,920
Funding�Saurces:
Nrport Fund - - - 2,646 - - 2,646�
Granfs - - - 50,274 - - 50,2Z4
220
City ofAubum Draft Capital Faci ities Plan
TABLE A-2 (continued)
2076 2017 2018 2079 2020 2021 �Total
Non-Capacitv Proiects: �
9 Taxiway Seal Coat&Restripe
Capital Costs - - - - 50,120 - 50;120
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - - 2,506 - 2,506
Grants - - - - 47,614 - 47,614
10 West Helicopter Parking Pads,Facilkies and Access Road
Gapital Costs - - - - 200,000 600,000 800,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - - 10,000 30,000 40,000.
Grants - - - - 190,000 570,000 760,000
11 Rurnuay 16/34 Sealcoat
Capital Cosis - - - - - 475,000 475,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund - - - - - 23,750 23,750
Grants - - - - - 451,250 457,250
SWMMARY:
CAPRAL C05T5
CapaciryProjects - - - - - - -
Non-CapacityProjects 140,000 1,624,000 - 21,720 320,120 5,672,810 8,078,650
Total Cosis 140,000 1,624,000 - 21,720 320,120 5,672,810 8,078.650
FUI�ING SOURCES:
Pifport Fund 7,000 214,200 - 16,086 16,006 283,641 536,933
_.. ..
Grants (Fed,Slate,Locap 133,000 1;409,800 - 05,634 304,114 _ 5,389,169_ _7,541,717_
Total Funding 740,000 1,624,000 - 21,720 320,120 5;672,810 8,078,650
221
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan "
AIRPORT'FUND (435) CapitalFacilRles Blan
Siz Year Capital Fabflkies Plan,�2016-2021 Ente►prise Funds
ProjectTitle: Airp:ort Security Camera 8 Gate Acces"s Upgrades
Project No: cpi[xXx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Kevin Snyde�
Desciiption: - . . - . . - -� . . _ - .. -
Increased securiry identified bytlie Federal Aviation AdminisVation and ihe Transportation Security AdminisVatlon for
Airport control access gates(both vehiGe arxl personnel). This project will i�Tall securfty cameres and replace the
obsolete gate operator access oontrol imi5. TTie proposed system will include cards arid keypad operation witFi both
inbound and outbound tradcing of the aulhorized te�nt/guest. Personnel gates will also haye the same system.
Progress Summary:
- - - _
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
None
AcUvity:
2075 YE 2018 Vear End
Funtlln9 Sources Prlortn�1A15 F�lmate 2018 Bud et 2077 Butlget Pro eet7oql
UniesWCted Airpaf�Reoanue - - - - -
Federel�rent-Unsecured - - - - -
State Giant�-Unsecured - - - -
Tcfal FunCing Sourwc - - - - -
Capital Ez�nditures
Design - - - ' '
Right oi WaY ' ' ' _ _.
Conshuction - ' ' ' ' -
_ _. _ _. . _. . . __._ __ _ ._. . _. __ . . _ .__ -
Torai���aiw.as - - - - -
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
rofal
2U78 2079 2020 _ 2021 __ .2D16202L _
_
Funding Sources � - -— --...�" �- -... -�--
UruesfHctedAirportRe�snue - - 3,500 - 3;500
Fedeial Gran!Lnsecuied - - 63,000 - 63,000
State Grent-f%nsecured - 3,500 3,500
Tofal Funding Soureea - - 70,000 - 70,000
Capifal Expenditurea
Design - - - - .
� RigAt ol WaY ' ' ' ' '
Consfi�ctiar - - 70,000 70,000
Totli ExpendiWres - - 70,000 • 70,000
�G2MTOtherSources: FederalANationAdministration � - � � �� - �
. . ... . . . . . . ... . . .
222
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
_ _
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan
Soc Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: Land Acquisi4ion for Future Approaches
Projea No: cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. Kevin Snyder
DescripUon:
Acquire land at tlie curreM Park and Ride for future approaches.
Piogrgss Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Aatiyity:
2015 YE 2016 Year End
FundingSources: Prlorto2015 Estlmate 2016Budget _.:2077Budget. _.P.rojectTofaL .
UnreshictedAirportRevenue - - - -21;000� � -� —_
Fedaral G2nt-Unsecu�ed - - - 378;000 -
Stete Grar�t-Unsecured 21,000
Total Funding Sourcas - - - 420,000 -
Capital ExpandiWros:
Design - ' ' ' '
Acqufsition - - - 420,000 -
COIIS�NCIIWI -
Total ExpendiWres - - - 420,000� -
Foresasted Project Cost:
Total
2018 �2079 2020 2021. 20762027
FunAing Sourcas:
Unresfncted AirpwY Rewnue - - - - 21,000
Federsl Grent-Unsecurad - - - - 378,000
State Grant-Unsecurod - 21,000.
Tofal Funding Sources - - - - 420,000�
Capital ExpandiWres
Design ' ' ' ' '
Acquisition - - - - 420,000
Construction -
7otal ExpentllWres: - - - - 420,000
G2M/Olher Sources: Federal AWation Admini5tration - � �
223
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capkal Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTiue: Runway Enhanceme�ts
Project No: CpXXXX
Projectrype: Non-Capacity
Project Nlanager. Kevin Snyder
Desariptfon:
Enhance Rurnvay 16/34 per Airport Layout Plan 8 Master Plan Update for increased safety and utilizatfon.
-- __. .. _. . ._. .
Progress Summary:
ErnrironmeMal AssessmeM is planned for 2015,design and scope of work to be completed im2016 and construction is
anticipated ro begin in2017.
FutareJmpact on Opgrating Budgetc_
i4ctNity:
2015 YE 2016 YeaCEnA
Funtling.Sources: Prlor to��2075 Estlmate 2018 ButlBet 2017 BudBet ProJeet Tofal
UnrestnctedAlrpartRe�snue - 8,050 7,000 �53,200 75,050
feUeral�GreM-Secured - 744,900 126,000 957,600 270,900 �
State G�ant-Unsecu�eo' 8.050 7,000 53,200 15,050
Totai Funding.Sourcea - 161,000 140,000 1,084,000 301,000
Capital F�cpenditures:
Deslgn - - 140,000 - 140,000�
EnvironmentalAssessment - 161,000 - - 161,000
COlIStNCIi0I1 - 1,OGA�OOO
� Total Expendimrec - 181,000 140,000 1,064,000 30'I,000
, ._ . _ _ . . _ . .
�FqrecastetlProjectCostE. � � � � �� � - �
Toral
2018 2019 2020 2021 20162021
Fundinp Sources: ,
�UmesMctedArrpatRevenue - - - - 60,20U
Federal Grant-Secured - - - - 1,083,600
Stete G`ant�1/nsecured - - .60,200.
- -_---- -�--- - '- -
Total Funding Sourtex - - - - 7,204,000�
Capital EtipendlWrex
. . _ pesl9n ' ' ' ' 140.000-
EnWonmeiHe/Assessment - - - - -
r.ORS(/UC�IOIJ - - 1,���0�0
rorai�o�nmwrex - - - - �.zoa.000
Gra�rts F Other Souices: Federal ANation Atlministralion
224
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- _ . _ -- _
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTipe: Automated Weather Observation System
Project No: cpz7cxx
ProjectType: Nbn-Capacity
ProjectManager: Kevin Snyde�
Description:
Install weather reporting equipmeM for instrument approach.
- -. . _
Progress Summary: -
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
Agtivitji:
2075 VE 2016 Vear End
Funding Soorces __PAor.to 2015 .F3timate 2076 Budgef 2077 Budget Project Total
UnresMcted Airpat Revenue - - � - - � - _
Fetlerel Grant-Unsecured - - - _ _
State Grent-Unsecured - _
Tofal Fundtng Sources: - ' - � -- - ----
CaPifal ExpendiWres: �
Design ' ' ' ' '
Rl9ht of Way - - _ _ _
Construction - -
Tofal ExpendlWres _ _ . . .
FoFeoasted P�ojectCost:
rofal
_.2018_ _ 2019 2020 2021 �201fi2021
Funding Sources: - - - -
UnrestnctedAirpatRevenue - 13,440 - - 73,440
FederalGrant-Unsecured - 241,920 - - 241,920
Stafe Granf-Unsecured = 13,440. - 13,440
Total Funtling Sourcas: - � 268;800�- - 266,800
Capital EzpendiWres:
Design ' ' ' - -
Right of Way - - _ _ _
� Canstruction - 268,800 - 266,800
Total EzpendiWres: - 266,800 - - "�- - -- 268,800
G2Ms/Othar Sources: Federal AHation Atlministretion ' -� � �
225
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- ---
AIRPORT FOND (435j Capital Facil'ities Plan
Six�(ear_Capital Facilities_Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjeaTt�e: Fuelfarm
Projecf Na. cpxx7c�c
ProjecfType:- Non-Capacity
Projecffvlanager: Kevin Snyde�
_ _
Desc[ip;lon:
_ _—- -- _
Cons Vuct a Fuel�:Farm�for Jet A seryice at Pirport
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Activily:
- 2015 YE 2016 YeacEnd
Funding Sources PrioCto2015 Effilmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget ProjeebSotal
UnresMctedAiryaC.Revenue - - - ����� �
Fedeial Grent rUnsecured - - - - -
State Grant-Unsecured� -
Total FunGing Sou�ces: - - • 140,000 -
� Capital EzpendlWres
.Design - - - 25;000 -
�Righf o/�WeY " ' _ " "
� donstmction. - - 115,000.
Total_ExpendiWres � - �- - 160.000 .
Forecasted Project Cost:
rotal
2018 2019 2020 2U27 2016202'I
Funding Sourcex
UnresMcted Airport Revenue - - - - �140,000
Federa/Grant-Unsecured - - - - -
State Grant-Unsecured - -
Totsl Funding Soureea - - - - 140�,000
Capipl ExpendiWres�
Design - -� - - 25,000
Right W Way - - ' - '
ConstNCtidn - �Y75,000
Total EzPendltures ' ' ' ' � ....140.000"
Grants/��OtherSomces: .____ _____ _.____._. . .
226
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- ---
AIRPORT FUND (435) CapitalPacflkies Plan
Siz Year Capkal Facllkles�Plan,201&2021 EnterpNse Funds
Projectrtle: Land Acquisi4ion
Project No: CpxXxx
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. Kevin Sflyde�
Description:
Land Acquisition-Artnstrong
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: �
None
AcWity: � - -- -
2015 YE �2p16 Year End
Funtling Sources Prlor to 2015 Estimam 2076 Bud et 2017 Budget Projeet Total
UnresMctatl Airpart Re�enue '"' "- " - - � _ - -
FederalGrant-Unsecuietl - - - - -
State Gran1-Unsecured - -
Total Funding Sources - - - . - -
Cepitel EzDentliWres:
Design ' - ' ' '
Ac9uisRiar ' ' ' ' '
QOIISfNLfIWI - -
Tofal ExPendiWres _ - .. . .. .- ' "
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
roml
2078 2019 �21120 ..2021. _ . 20162027
Funding Sources: -� - -
UnrestnctedAilportRevanue - - - 221,491 221,481
Federel Grent-Unsecured - ' - 3.986,829 .3,986,829
Stete Grant Lnsecmetl 221.490_ -_ 221.490.
Total Funding Sources: - -� -� 4,429,810 4,429,810
Capifal ExpendiWres
Oesign - - - - _
Acquisition - - - 4,429,810 4,429,810
Construction �- ..
Totel F�cpendfWres ��- " - . - 4,029,810 4,429,810
G2M/Other Sources: Federal Auatlon Administration
22�
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
--- -- - - - ---- -- - - -
AIRPORT FUND (43.5) Cap�tal,Facqities Flan
Six Year Caplfal Facllkles Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitie: Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)for Runway
ProjedNo: CpxXXX � ��
arojecYType: Non-Capacity
Projea nnanager. Ke4in Snyder
DescripUqn:
_
Install Precision Approach,Path�Indicato�(PAPI)for Runway to ieplace aging VPSI system.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
_ _ . _ _ - -- - --
Aetivity: -
2o�s re m�s vea.ena
Fundlnp5ources Pdor.io2075 .Fstlmafe 20168udget 2017Budget. .BrojectTotal.
UnresMcfed Airpart Re�nue _. -__- . . . . . - . . ._.___ � _—
Federel GreM-Unsecured - - -. -
StateGraM�-Unsecuied . _ _ - . - _._ . ..-. .._.._ . ... ._ '
Total Funtling Sources - - - - �-
Capltal�pendiWres
.. pesl9n ' ' ' _ '
Rig�t of WeY _ ' ' ' '
Cansfn�ction - '
TWaI ExpentliWres ' ' " ' '
Forecasted Projeet Cost.
rotel
2018 1079 2020. . . 2021. . 20762021.__
Funding Sourws:. .. . " . . " "- - " - - — . .
Unrestncted Aiipa"�t Revenue - - - 8,400 8,400
Federel Grenf-Unsecured - - - 151;200 151,200
StateGrnM�-Unsecured - 8,400 8.400
Total Funding Sourees - - 768,P00 168,000
Cepltal ExpendiWrec
Design - - - 20,000 20,000
Right of WeY _ _ ' ' '
ConstmCtlon - 148�000___ . __ 748�000.
Tofal ExpendlWres� - � - - 168,000 168,000 -
Grants/Other Souices: Fedaral AWation Adminlst20on
22g
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Fac�lit�es Plan
Six Year CapiFal Facilkies Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
Projeartle: West Side Fencing
Project No: cpxxxx
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
Projea Manager. Kevin Snyder
DescripUon:
Install fence on west side of property to complete perimeter security fencing arW help control wildl'rfe on th�e airport.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Activity: - -
2015 YE 2016 Year End
Funding Sourcex Prlor to 2015 Eatlmaffi 2018 Bud et 2077 Butl et . _ .Prc ect7ctal.
UrnesMcterl A/rpqf Re�snue " ' " " ' - - -'= -
Federal Grant-Unsecured - - _ _ _
SfateGrenf-lJnsecured - - _
Total Funding Sources _ _ _ _ _
Capltal Ezpanditures
Design ' ' ' ' '
Right o/Way - _ _ _ _
r.00S�NC�l0l1 - - -
Total EzpentllWres - ._ .. _ - � _-
Forecasted Project Cost:
TOtel
2018 2019 2020 2021 _201&2021 _
Funding Sources
UnresMctetl Aiipwt Revenue - 2,646 - - p,6q5
Federel Grant-Unsecured - 47,628 - - q���g
Stete GrerM-Unsecured - 2,646 2,646
Total Funding Sources -�� - . 52,920 - - 52,920
Capltel Expenditiirea
Design ' ' ' - -
Righf W WaY - ' ' - -
ConsWction 52,920 r,�,gyp
Total Fxpenditurex - 52,g20 " - 5��gyp
Grants YOther Sourcas: Fede21 ANation Administration �
229
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - -- -
- -
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capka�Facolit�es Plan
Six Year Capital Facilitfes Plan,2016-2021 Enterprise Funds
Projectrtle: Taxiway Seal Coat 8� Restripe
Project No: Cpxxxx
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Kevin Snyder
Description: - -
This project wili provide fundirig.for seal coatirig and resVipirg of the taxrvJay ttfiat was replaced in 2009.
Progress Summary:
Future ImpaMan Operating Budget:
fleWky:.
2075 YE. 2018 Year End
Funtling Sourcax Prior W 2015 EAimate 2016 Butlget 2017 BudOet Proje�Y Toml
UnresMcted Alrport Re�enue - - • - -
Federel GraM-Unsecureo' - ' ' ' '
�State Grant-Unsecured - -
Total FunGing Sources ' ' " ' '
Capital ExpenElW mx
Des79n ' ' ' ' '
Po9Mo/WaY _ ' ' ' _
COl1SWCN0l1 '
Tofel F�cpendlWrex - - - - -
Forecasted ProJec;Cos;i:
rota I
2078 2079 2020 2027 20162U21
. Funding$ourcea
UnresMctedAlrydt:Rewnue. - - 2,506 - 2,506
Federel Grent 1lnsecured - - 45,108� - 45,108
Stete Grant-Unsecured - 2,506 2;508
Tofel�Funding�Soureea - - 50,120 - 50,720
Capital FipenGitWrec �
DesiBn - - - ' .
Right of Way - - - - -
ConSfNCOon - - 50,120 __50.720.
Tofal ExpenCifurea - - .. ._ .. . .50;120� � - SOA20
GraMs7 Other Sourcas:" FetlarafAoielion Administralion
. . . . _ . . ._ ..
230
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capna�Faonitiea elan
Six Year Capital Facflities Plan,201&2021 �Enterprise Funds
ProjectTitle: West Helicopter Parking Pads, Facilities and Access Road
Project No: cpxx�cx .
erojectType: Non-Gapacity
Project�Manager. Kevitt Snyd@�
Desarlptiori:
This project will irutall four helicopter parking positions pads on the west side of the Airport. In addition this project will construct
two aJiation-use tiuildings and an access road to NE 16th Street. Eri4ironmental work may be required due to proparty.acquis_i0on
and to mitigate any potential impacts to we4lands. Design work will consist of designing helicopter parkirg positions to meetFA9
standarcls and�desgn of access road and site improvements to cbnstruct the 6uildings.
Progress Summary: � - � ��
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Activity:
2075 YE 20761'ear End
Fundfng Sources: PNor to 2075 Estlmate 2016 Budget 2017 Budget Pro�eG�Tolal
Unre5lACtetl A/iporf Rersnue - - - - -
Federal Grent-Unsecured - - - - -
State Granf Lnsecured
Total Funding Sources - - - � . � - - _
Capitel FspendiWrex
. .-Design ' _ ' ' '
EnNronmenfal - - - • -
propgrtY " " ' " '
Construction
' _ ' " . ____._-
Tofnl FspandiWres: - _ _ _ _
Forecasted Projact Cost: " - - � � - �-
Tofal
2018 2019. 2020 2021 20762027
FundingSourcas: �- - --_._. _.
UrnestActetl Alryad Rerenue - - 10,000 30;000 60,000
Federal GiaM-Unsecured - - 180,000 540,000 720,000
State G/an(Lnsecured 10,000 30,000 40,000
Total Funtling Sources .. - 200,000 600,000 BOD,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 125,000 - 125,000
EnNmnmental - - 75,000 - 75,000
Pro�fy - - - 350,000 350,000
consrn.crron 2so,000 2so.oao
rorei�cPe�a�mres - • 2oa,000 soo.000 aoo,000
G2rrts/Other Sources: Fetleral Adation Admfnistration - �
231
City ofAuliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
- - --- - - - - -- - _-- _
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capifal Facilities Plan
S(z Year Capifal Facilities PIan,2016-2021 Enterp►ise Fiinds
ProjectTitle: Runway 16/.34 Sealc.oat
ProjectNo: Cpxzi[x
Project7ype: Non-Capacity
Froject Manager. Kevin Snyder
- -- - -- - - - -- _ ,
_--- -
Descrlption:
Unmaintalned asphak can crack allov✓ing water penetration which ttien�weakan the sutisurface creating aiarger area of failure
making an unsaFe errvironmerrt for departing�or landing during a crttical.phase of fligM. The.FAA�recommends a seal coat every�5
years to extand thei'rfe of the asphalt.� R is less e�ryensive to maiMain the asphatt than to rehab or recons;ruct. This project should
include any creck sealing,sealcoat�and re-paining of the runway en4ironment.
ProgressSummaryc
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
None
Activity:
2015 YE .ZD16 Year End
Funding Sources Prfor to 2015._.__.EstimBte.. 2016.Buifpet . �2077 Butlpat P.roJoet Tofel
Unrestnctetl AirpoR Rewnue - - • - •
Federal GraM-Unsecured - - - - -
State Grant-Unsecmed -
Totai FunAing Souries - - • - -
Cepitel�EzpendiWres
Deslgn _ ' ' ' � '
Rfghf o/WaY - ' ' . '
COlIStNC�/Oil �
, Total ExpendiWres: - -- - - -
Forecasted Project Cost � � � �� � � �
rofel
2018 2019 T020 2021 .207621121
Funding Soureea �
UnresfrictedAliportRe�nue - - - 23,750 Yi,750
FederelGrent-Unsecured - - - 427�,500 427,500
Stete GrenF-Unsecured 23;750 . __.23,750
TWaI Fundinp Sourcex - - - 475,000 475,000
Capltal Expendihirex
� �Design - - - 100.000 100,000
RigM of WaY ' ' ' ' '
Construction 375,000 375.000
Total Expendihires - - - 475,000 -475,000
Gfan[s�/Other Sources: Faderal ANation Administration - -- -" �-�-�- - - - -- � � —� � " - �
232
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
CEMETERY
Current Facilities
The City owns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (50
acres and five buildings) that provides burial services and related merchandise for the
community. The Pioneer Cemetery is a historic cemetery which is no longer used fo.r burial
purposes. Table G1 "Facilitie.s Inventory" lists the facilities along with their cuRent capacity and
location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS of 27 burial plots/niches per 1,000 p"opulation is based on the existing
inventory divided by the 2015 citywide population of 75,545. The proposed LOS of 40 burial
plotslniches per 1,000 population is based on 4he projected inventory divided by the 2027
projected citywide population of 85,912.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The 6FP does not include any Ce.metery capital facili4ies proje.cts during 2016 -2021.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery during the six years
2017=2022.
TABLE C-1
Facilities Inventory
Cemetery
- - CAPACITY
FACILITY #of Burial PlotslNiches LOCATION
Ezistirig Inventory:
Mountain ViewCemetery 2,050 2020 MouMain View Dr.
Pioneer Cemetery - 8th&Aubum Way No.
Total Existing Inventay 7,050
ProPasetl GapacityProjects:
NewDeyelopment-Bunal Plofs 660 Memory HeigMs
NewDevelopment-Burial Plots 764 10th Addition
Total Propased Capacrty Projects 1,-424
2021 Projected Invento Total 3,474
233
Ciry of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
,
� �
CITY OF - �
* ,
� MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
234
Ciry of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
POLICE
Current Facili4ies
The City of Aubum Police Department provides a full range of law enforcement:services to the
citizens of Aubum. All Divisions of the Auburn Police Department are housed at340 East Main
5treet, Suite 201. The Divisions include Patrol, Investiga4ions, Administrative Services,
Inspectional Services, and Records.
Level of Servic.e (LOS)
The City of Auburn Police Department contracts with SGORE, an outside entity, for housing of
all misdemeanant inmates.
Cap'ital Facilities Projects and Financing
The CFP dces not include any Police capital facilities projects during 2016 -2021.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
The jail services expenses are dependent on the City's contract agreement with SCORE.
235
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities PZ¢iz
� " � '
CITY OF - - , �
* -
� 1vtORE THAN YQU IMAGINED
236
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
FIRE PROTECTION
Current Facilities
The Valley Regional Fire Authority provides fire protection and rescue services io a 25-square
mife area which includes the City of Auburn, the City of Algona, the City of Pacific and King
Cownty Fire Protection District 31. The Valley Regional Fire Authority operates out of five
stations, which ate manned 24 hou�s per day. The North Station #31 also serves as the
department headquarters and includes a hose and training tower. Each station is assigned fire
apparatus (Engines and Aitl Vehicles). Table F-1 "Facilities Inveritory' lists the facilities along
with their current capacity and location.
Level of Senrice (LOS)
The cuYrent LOS of 0.23 fi�e apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory
(17 fire apparatus) divided by the 2015 citywide population of 75,545. The proposed LOS of
0.21 fire apparatus per 1,000 is bas.ed on the 2021 planned inventory(18 fire apparatus)diVided
by the 2021 projected citywide population of 85,912.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The Valley Regional Fire Authoriry includes one capital project at a cost of $840,000 for fire
apparatus enhancements and improvements. Table F-2 shows the proposed fnancing plan
followed by an indiyidual worksheet showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Opereting Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts fore.casted for fire protection during the siz years
2017—2022.
237
Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE F-7
Facilities Inventory
Vailey Regional Fire Authority
cneac�r�.
FACILITY Flre Apparatus AId Y.ehicles LOCATION
Ezisting lnventory:
SPations:
Nath Station#31 1101 D'Street NE, Aubum
Firsi Li�ie 2 1
Resenre 1 1
South Station#32 1951 R'Street SE, Autium
First Line 1 1
Reserve 1 1
Lakeland Station#33 500 182nd Aee E, Aubum
First Liiie 1 -
Resenre 1 -
Lea Hill Station�t34 31290 124th Aye SE, Autium
First Line 1 -
Resenre 1 -
GSA Station#35 2815 C St S1N, Aubum
Reserye 1 1
Paoific Station#38 133 3rd A�e SE, Pacific
_
Flrst Line 1 -
Reserve 1 -
Total 6dsting Irnerkay 12 5
Prop"ased Inyentory Addi(ions:
First line 1 -
Total Prbposed Capacity Projects 1 .. . ..
2021 Projected Inventory Total 13 5
238
City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE F-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJEGTS AND FINANGING
VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY
2016 __ 2017 2018 2019 2D20 2021 Total
Non•Capacitv Proiects: --
1 Fre S;ation Facility Relocation,En6anaements&Impro4ements
Capital Costs 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 840,000
Funding Sources:
Grants - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - .
ImpacUMitigation Fees 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 840,000
SUMMARY:
CAPRALCOSTS
GapacityProjects - - - - - - -
Non-CapacityProjects 240,000 900,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150;000 840,000
_ _. .
Total Costs 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 750,000 840,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
CemeteryFund - - - - - - -
Granis (Fed,State.Local) - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,Ob0 840,0'00
Total Funtling 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 840,000
239
City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan
Valley Regional Fire Authority CapkalFacilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,20162021
Projea TiUe: Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements � Improvements
Project Na cpxXXX
Project Type:
ProjectNtanager. Mark Horaski
Descrlptlon:
Facility trnprovement projects are identified and prioritized annualy and are subject to delay to accommodate emergency
repairs. The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one projed in 2015 for apparaNs enhancemerrts and improvements.
The amount p�eserrted in 2016 will complete the acquisition and improvemerrt of the new apparatus:
Progress Summary:
Fire mitigation and impact Taes wiil be transferred to the Valley Regional Fire Authority to pay for apparatus enhancemer�ts
and improvemerrts in 2015 and 2016.
Future Impact on Operafing Budget:
Activity:
—
(PreNous 2 Yrs.) 20�5 YE 2018 Year Entl
Funtling Sourees PNor to,T075. Estlmate 2016 BuAget �2077 Budget Projeet 7oql
G/eMs ' ' ' - "
Bond Proceeds ' ' �' ' -
. . . . . ._ . . _ _ . ..
Impact/Nitigatlon Fees 100,000 460,000 240.000 100,000 800,000
Total Funding Sou�ees: 100,000 680,000 240,000 700,000 800,000
Capital FspendiWres:
Design _ ' ' ' '
RlgM o/Wey - - - - -
co�srtic�io� _ _.ioo,000 aso,000_ ___ _ 2ao,000 �oo.000 soo,000
Total�Fspenditures: 700,000 d80,000 240,000 700,000 800,000
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
7ota1
2018 2019 ?A7A 2027 201&2021.
FunAing Sou�ces: � -
GranFs - - - - -
.BaMProceeds ' ' ' ' '
ImpacUMTigationFees 100.000 100,000. 150,000 150.000 840.000
Tofal Funding Sourqes 100,000 100,000 750,000 150.000 840,000
Capltal.ExpendlN}ed: -
Design - -� - - -
wern w wsr - - - - -
cw�srticno� �oo,000 �oo.000 �so.000 �so.000 eao.000
rorar�peoai�,rex �oo,000 +oo,000 �so,000 �w,00a eao,000
240
Exhibit "B"
Agenda bill/sfaff report dated December 15, 2015.
------------------
Ordinance No. 6580
December 22, 2015
Page 7
cmoF_ -*1�* AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
/ a .
WASH WGTON
Agenda Subject Ordinance No. 6580 Date:
2015 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments—City Initiated December 15, 2015
Plan Polic IText Amendments, CPA15-0001
Department: Community Attachments: Budget Impact: N/A
Development & Public Works Ordinance No. 6580
Summary Matrix
See policy/text amendment
sections of the binder
Administretive Recommendation: City Co,uncil to introduce and approve Ordiance No. 6580
amending the Comprehensive Plan to include 2015 C'ity-Ini4iated Annual Comprehensive Plan
Amendments.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its C,omprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the
Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn
Comprehensiye Plan has been amended annually. This year the City is also updating the
Comprehensive Plan in response to the periodic update required under the WA State Growth
Management Act(GMA). The City adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan in response to the periodic
updates required under the GMA on December 14, 2015 by Ordinance No. 6584.
Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Aubum (city-initiated) and by private
citizens (privately-initiated). This year the city is initiating:
. Five policy/text amendments.
. (No map amendments are currently being processed with fhis years amendment process)
The crry received fhree privately-initiated plan map amendments by the submittal deadline. However, the
processing of these has been postponed fo allow fhe environmental review process to be completed, as
required. These are listed in the dockef. but the applic8tions are not included in the note600ks. These
will be considered at a fu(ure, yet-to-be-determined time.
This staff report and recommendation addresses Comprehensive PolicylText (P!T)Amendments P!f# 1
through#5. This is the only staff repoA associated with tFie annual comprehensive plan amendment
process.
Reviewed by Council 8.Committees: Reviewed by Departments 8 Divisions:
❑Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑ Building ❑ M&O
❑Airport ❑ Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor
❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Services ❑ Finance ❑ Parks
❑ Human Services ❑ Planning&Dev. ❑ Fire � Planning
❑ Park Boartl ❑Public Works - ❑ Legal ❑ Police
� Planning Comm. ❑ Other - � Public Works ❑ Human Resources
Action:
, Committee Approval: �Yes ❑No
Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing _/_/_
Referred to Until / �/
Tabled -- Until _l_%
Councilmember: Staff: Dizon
Meetin Date: December 14, 2015 Item Number:
Agenda Subject: CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan PolicylText Amendments
In terms of process, the Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public
hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a
recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on
the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year.
At its December 8, 2015 public hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed the following annual
comprehensive plan amendments:
P!T#1 —Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan
P/T#2—Incorporate DieringerSchool District Capital Facilities Plan
Pff#3—Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan
P/T#4—Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan
P!T#5—Incorporate City of Auburn Capifal Facilities Plan
The Planning Commission has forward its recommendation for approval to the City council on
all comprehensive plan amendments.
A. Findings
1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growfh Management Act (GMA)) provides for
amendments to Iocaily adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances
provided for in State law, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city
or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year.
2. The City of Auburn established a June 5, 2015 deadline for the submittal of privately-
initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the
filing deadline was provided on the City's website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent
to a compiled "interested parties" notification list in May 2015. The City received three
privately-initiated plan map amendments by the submittal deadline. However, the processing
of these has bene p.ostponed to allow the environmental review process to be completed, as
required by City and state law. These applica4ions have been listed in the docket, but the
application materials are not provided in the notebooks. These applica4ions will be
considered at a future unspecified time.
3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities
Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well
as the Citys Capital Facilities Plan are referenced in Chapter 5, Capital Facilities, of 4he
existing Auburn Comprehensive Plan and Volume 3, Capital Facilities Element, of fhe
Updated Comprehensive Plan. The incorporation of the Capital Facilities Plans is
processed as Policy/Text(P!f) amendments.
4. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school
district capital facilities plans were prepared separetely by each school district acting as their
own lead agency, as allowed tiy state law. Each district issued separete Determina4ions of
Non-Significance (DNS).
5. The endironmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the
remaining amendment resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issuetl for the
City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on November 2, 2015 (City File # SEP15-
0030). The comment period ended November 16, 2015 and the appeal period ended
Agenda Subject CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan PolicylText Amendments
November 30, 2015. The City did not receive ariy comments in response to the issuance of
the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS).
6. AubLm City Code Chapter 14.22 ou4lines fhe process for submittal of privately-initiated
amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows:
"Section 14.22.100
A, The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed
amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing sliall be
given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following:
1. For site-specific plan map amendments:
a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not
less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing;
b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of
record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment
request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing;
2. For area-wide plan map amendments:
a. Notice shall be published once in the o�cial newspaper of tFie city not
less than 10 calendar days prior to 4he date of public hearing;
b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of
record within the area subject to the proposed amendment;
c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the
area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar
days prior to the date of the public hearing.
B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum.noticing
provisions noted above as deemed necessary:
C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct
a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall
make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning
commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent.
with those findings to the city council.
D. The city council, iF it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written
findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance.
E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning
commission shall be forwariied for state agency review consistent with RCW
36.70A.106.
F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be rimade in
accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord:6172 § 1, 2008.)"
7. As provided in the City Code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are ini4ially reyiewed
during a public hearing process before the City of Aubum Planning Commission, who then
provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration
and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the
year.
S. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in
this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state
agencies as required for the state review on November 6, 2015: The Washington State
Office of Commerce acknowledged receipt by letter dated November 9, 2015. No
comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or
other state agencies as of the writing of this report.
Agenda Subject: CPA15-000�, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan Policy/Text Amendments
9. Due to the nature and limited number of policy/teut changes, and the lack of private initiated
map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house was not
conducted as provided for in the city code.
10. The notice of public hearing was published on November 12, 2015 in the Seattle Times
which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for
December 8, 2015.
11. On December 8, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
proposed annual amendments as part of the process required by code.
12. On December 14, 2015 the City Council in a regular Study Session reviewed the proposed
annual amendments.
13. The following report identifies the Comprehensive Plan Map Policy/Text (PIT) amendments
4hat were considered by the Planning Commission at their December 8, 2015 public hearing
with 4he Planning Commission recommendation.
---------------December 8, 2015 Planning Commission Public Hearing -------------------------
Comarehensive Plan Maa Amendments (File No. CPA15-00011
(No map amendments are currendy proposed with this year's amendment process)
Comarehensive Plan Policv/Text Amendments.(F-ile No. CPA15-00011
PIT#7
Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015 through 2021 into the City of
Auburn Comprehensive Plan.
Discussion
The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities
Plan (CFP) covering from 2015-2021. The CFP was adopted by the Auburn School District
School Board of Directors on June 8, 2015 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and
a Determination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP
serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the schoo(district:
The Planning Commission action is incorporetion of the Au6um School District Capital Facil�ities
Plan into 4he City's Comprehensive Plan.
The CFP includes the following:
• six—year enrollment projections
• Auburn school district level of service standards
• An inventory of existing facilities
. The districYs overall capacity of the 6-year period
• District capital construction Plan
. Impact fee calculations
A review of the Auburn School DistricYs updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates 4he District
is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family
Agenda Subject CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan PolicylText Amendments
dwellings is proposed to be $5,330.88, an increase of$1,193.67 and the requested fee for
multiple-family dwellings is $2,625.01, a decrease of$893.16. The actual impact fee to be
established is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council.
Plannina Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission�ecommends approval of 4he Aubum School District Capital Facilities
Plan 2015 through 2021 to the City Council
PIT#2
Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021 into the City of
Aubum Comprehensive Plan.
Discussion
The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities
Plan 2016 - 2021. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on
June 15, 2015. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information
contained in the School District CFP serves-as the basis for the City's collection of school
impact,fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is inoorporation of
the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The CFP includes the following:
• Overview
• An inventory of existing facilities
• six-year enrollment projections
• standard of service
• Capacity projects
• Finance plan
• Impact fee calculations
A review of the Dieringer School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the
District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-farriily
dwellings is proposed to be $4,672.0.0, an increase of$1,402.00 and the requested fee for
multiple family dwellings is $1,518.00; a decrease of$207.00. The actual impact fee to be
established is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council.
Planninq Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission recommends approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities
Plan 2016-2021 to the City Council.
P/T#3
Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2016 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of
Auburn Comprehensive Plan.
Discussion
The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital
Facilities Plan 2016. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board
July 28, 2015. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information
contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school
impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporafion of
the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Agenda Subject: CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan PolicylText Amendments
The CFP includes the following:
. Introduction
e Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities
. Needs forecast, existing & new facilities
• Six—year finance plan
• Maps of district boundaries
• Building capacities 8 portable locations
• Studentforecast
. Capacity summaries
• Impact fee calculations
• Summary of changes from the 2015 plan
A review of the Federal Way School DistricYs updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the
District is re:questing a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family
dwellings is proposed to b.e $2,899.00, representing a decrease of$2,275.00 and the
requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $506.00, a decrease of$1,328.00. The actual
impact fee to be established is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council.
Plannino Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission �ecommends apProval of the Federal Way School DistricYs 2016
Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council.
P/T#4
Inco�porate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 into the City
of Aubum Comprehensi4e Plan.
Discussion
The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 Capital
Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on July 14,
2015 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the
School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collec4ion of school impact fees on behalf
of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District
Capital Facili4ies Plan into 4he City's Comprehensive Plan.
The CFP includes the following:
• Executive Summary
• Six-year enrollment projection & history
• District standarii of service
• Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools
• Siz-year planning & c.onstruc4ion plan
. PoRable classrooms
• Proje.cted classroom capacity
• Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules
• Summary of changes to previous plan
A review of the Kent School DistricYs updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is
requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings
is proposed to be $4,990.00, representing a decrease of$496.00 and the requested fee for
Agenda Subject: CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15, 2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan Policy/Text Amendments
multi-family dwellings is $2,163.00, a decrease of$1,215.00. The actual impact fee to be
established is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council.
Plannina Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission recommends approval of the Kent School Dislrict Capital Facilities Plan
2015-2016 to 2020-2021 to the City Council.
CPM #5
Incorporate the City of Auburn's 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021, into the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Discussion
A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington
State Growth Management Act(GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities
plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a
forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or
expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with
identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Aubum 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2016-
2021 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan
element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070 (3) of the GMA requires 4he following:
"A capital facilities plan element consisting of:
(a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the
locations and capacities of the capital facilities;
(b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities;
(c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities;
(d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected
funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such
purposes; and
(e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short
of ineeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital
facili4ies plan etement, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element
are coordinated ancJ consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in
the capital facilities plan element."
A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improyement, or other long-
lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital
facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street
and road lighfing systems, treffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer
systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital
facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities.
The memo dated November 10, 2014 prepared by the City's Finance Department confained in
the three ring binder highlights the major changes in the CFP from last year. The proposed City
of Aubum Cryear Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021 is incorporated by reference in the
Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5, Capital Facilities. This will be incorporated into the "Capital
Facilities Element" of the updated Comprehensive Plan (GMA required periodic update).
Agenda Subject: CPA15-0001, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Annual Date: December 15,2015
Amendments—City Initiated Plan Policy/Text Amendments
Plannina Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission recommends approval of the City of Auburn's 6-year Capital Facili4ies
Plan 2016-2021 to the City Council with the revised Pages 2, 3, 195, 197 and 202 as
recommended by staff.