The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5807ORDINANCE NO. 5807 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTERS 36.70A AND 35A.63 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on August 18, 1986 adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995 the City of Auburn adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on September 5, 1995 reaffirmed that action by Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments were processed by the Planning and Community Development Department as proposed Year 2003 amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the Year 2003 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act with no appeals having been filed; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Office of Community Development and other State agencies for the 60 day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on October ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5807 December 04, 2003 Pagel 7, 2003 conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments and continued said hearing to October 14, 2003; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Auburn City Planning Commission heard public testimony and took evidence and exhibits into consideration; and WHEREAS, thereafter the Auburn City Planning Commission made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2003 Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2003 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2003 the Auburn City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments are herewith adopted and approved and it is herewith directed that they be filed along with this Ordinance with the Auburn City Clerk and be available for public inspection. Section 2. The 2003 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986 by Resolution No. 1703 and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995. Section 3. The Comprehensive Plan and amendments are herewith designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5807 December 04, 2003 Page 2 Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: DEC 15 260"1 PASSED: DEC 15 203 APPROVED: DEC 15 20W Peter B. Lewis MAYOR ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5807 December 04, 2003 Page 3 ATTEST: A u W ? Le&&� anielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO F Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Ordinance No. 5807 December 04, 2003 Page 4 Exhibit "A " CPM #1 To amend the Comprehensive Plan Map - from "High Density Residential" to "Heavy Commercial" for the east portion of property located in the 4300 block (east side) of Auburn Way North (west of I Street NE right-of-way). (STR 31-22-05) Applicant: Children's Home Society of Washington PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 0 CPM # 1 SCALE: 1" = 4OO ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA "CITY LIMITS Located in: SW 31-22-05 CPM #2 To amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from. "Public/Quasi-Public" to "Light Industrial" for properties located on the t� south side of 49 Street NW, west of Auburn Way North. (STR 36-22-04) Applicant: Thomas Academy PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT i i , 1 52ND I i -- - #2 {1 I TO LI HT INDU RIAL i S (10 U 7 0 CPM # 2 SCALE: 1 = 4OO' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA 44"'CITY LIMITS Located in: SW31-22 05 CPM#5 Amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from "Light Industrial" to "Heavy Commercial" for properties generally located between the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks, just north of 15th Street NW. (STIR 12-21-04) Applicant/Owner: La Terra Limited Partnership PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT CPM # 5 SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,,,,CITY LIMITS Located in: NE 12-21-04 CPM#8 To amend the Comprehensive Plan map _ from "Single Family Residential" to "Moderate Density Residential" for properties within three planning areas (areas 7, 8 and 9) of the Lakeland Hills South PUD. A. Area 7 B. Area 8 C. Area 9 (STR 05-20-05) Applicant: Apex Engineering Owner: Investco Financial Corporation PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT SINGLE FAMILY RE IDENTIAL TO MODERATE DENS =RESIDENTIA i i i 0 V J M O O N S U J Z Z 2 S a a m 0 0 CPM # 8a SCALE: 1 = 40O ED PROPOSED CHANGE AREA 44411CITY LIMITS Located in: NW, SW 05-20-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 200' CPM # 8 b SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,,,'CITY LIMITS located in: NW, NE 05-20-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT t F I f(t { j i 1 OPEN SPACE TO MODE TE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL J j 77S j(� 0 O { 4 CPM # 8 c SCALE: 1 = 400'® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA `L"'CITY LIMITS Located in: NW, NE 05-2D-05 CPM#9 Amend the Auburn Comprehensive Sewer Plan to include several parcels in the City's sewer service area. (STIR 05-20-05) Applicant/Owner: Dieringer School District PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT SCALE: 1" = 300' CPM # 9 ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,....CITY LIMITS Addxwu Located in: SE 05-20-05 CPM #11 To amend the Comprehensive Plan map by designating a variety of city -owned properties from various plan map designations (noted) to "Public & Quasi - Public". l la Cemetery "Single Family Residential' 11 b- Parks and Recreation b. West Beverly Park, "Single Family Residential' 11h c. Gaines Park, "Single Family Residential d. Tot lot @ 17th/Fir Street SE, "Single Family Residential' e. Clark property, "Single Family Residential' f. Riverwalk Park, "Single Family Residential' g. Ballard Park, "Single Family Residential' h. Rotary Park, "Single Family Residential' l l i- Storm Utility i. West Beverly Storm Pond, "Heavy Commercial' 11l j. Auburn 400 Storm Pond, "Light Industrial' k. Riverwalk pond, "Single Family Residential I. City Storm Pond in County, "Totem Area", "Undesignated" 11 n- 11p Water Utility n. Well site, "Office Residential' o. Reservoir, "Single Family Residential' p. Reservoir, "Single Family Residential' l lq- Mitigation sites q. "Benaroya" wetland/creek mitigation site, "Light Industrial' 11t r. "Gertrude Jones", wetland sites s. "Thormod", mitigation sites t. "Dipietro/Campbell', wetland site l l u Municipal Purpose u. Proposed Fire Station, "Heavy Commercial' PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT PW�l 3 3 T��_ �3 Hwy SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL , la TO PUBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC ti CANYON i I ROAD yWY l <Fy 18 � i � � ANYDN ROAD ST Ld o � � Eo ,� CPM # 11 (a) SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,..,'CITY LIMITS Located in: SW 142104 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT CPM # I1 (b, c) SCALE: i" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ", CITY LIMITS Located in: SE 11-21-04 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT IC SE ]15Tf{I T S 1 Tom_ f = 6 LL- fit�� L F M LY R SI E L { i 1 o E ��-T z � 21ST S T o E 0 _ Z CPM # 11 (d), SCALE: 1 = 300'® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA �'�CITY LIMITS Located in: NE 20-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 77 ry� 3 T t > FI M4v� 3 T } � k, 1 \ { ..-------�....----~.__--.-•.--_._. Y RESIDENTIAL � RIVER TO PUBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC o # 11e �-T J M O z € f 1 � I w i O }(}{ O JJ CPM # 11 (e) SCALE: 1 = 5OO' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ��CITY LIMITS Located in: SE 30-21-05 PROPOSED SE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT "--"\ j, I 2w CPM 11 (f) wo SCALE: 1 = 4OO' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,,,'CITY LIMITS Located in: NW29-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT Qw-' Tj-JJ!!:E01-j::j Ej i IT W P VrJJ ti 3$T 3 T 4 Y RESIDENTIAL RIVER TO PUBLIC & Quad PUBLIC CPM # 11 (g) SCALE: 1" = 5OO' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA Located LIMITS cared in: SW 29-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT Y i f i T SI GLE FAMILY S L TO PUBLIC & Q BLIC -I , - 7J- 2 TH � � F U S i .� CPM # 11 ( h ) SCALE: 1 f = 400'® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA "CITY LIMITS Located in: NW29 21-05 N U ifs J ,9 El 1 m a 0 200' 400' SCALE: 1" = 400' PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 22ND STS NW _ I OT HEAWCOMMEF-IALSO PUBLI� & QUAS PUBLIC . CPM # 11 ( i ) ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA """CITY LIMITS 11 Located in: SE 11-21-04 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PUBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC E-391 7-1 ti- 71 TT i 4 !`� -T-jr-777- -T-\ -TIT CPM # 11 SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA Z-d—l"CPfY LIMITS Located in: NE 23-21-04 PROPOSED SE 0 i t COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT CPM # 11 ( k) SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA `'CITY LIMITS Located in: NW29-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT ! I II wl u SCALE: 1" = 400' PTF CPM # 11 (L) ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA .,,.CITY LIMITS I 1 ii Located in: NW 30-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE _J 1 � ilMme__ µ rn -J--j � j3 } L E S G V E PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 1 �Po ) i 18 H STI S F I ,� CPM SCALE: 1" = 400' # 11 (n) ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,...CITY LIMITS Located in: NE 19-21-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT .� CPM # 11 (o) SCALE: 1' = 400 ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ` "CITY LWTS Located in: SW 31-22-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 3R � �,cpm # 11 (p) SCALE: 1" = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,,..'CITY LIMITS ..w11R t A Located in: NW 06-20-05 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MAP AMENDMENT CPM # 11 (q) SCALE: 1 = 400' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ' "CITY LIMITS Located in: NW 01-21-04 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT SCALE: 1" = 400' (r, S, t) ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ZZI,1CITY LIMITS Located in: NE12-21-04 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN a 35TH ST NE �} MAP AMENDMENT +11" -- Arl7l UJ U30� CPM # 11 (u) SCALE: 1 = 4OO' ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ''CITY LIMITS Located in: SW 06-21-05 CPM#12 To amend the Potential Annexation - Area (PAA) boundary to reflect the annexation/de-annexation with the City of Pacific. (STIR 31-21-05) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT 0 aw ,W' CPM # 12 Hca SCALE: 1 = 4OO ® PROPOSED CHANGE AREA ,'-,CPTY LIMITS Located in: SW 31-21-05 P/T #1 Incorporate Auburn School District Updated 2003 to 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 127 2003) AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 AU13URN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Ammue to ExeeHeriee" - Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Pacific Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 12, 2003 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 BOARD of DIRECTORS Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Janice Nelson Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent "Avenue ltfl Excellence" Section I Section II Section III Section IV Section V Section VI Section VII Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................. Page 1 Enrollment Projections ........................... Page 4 Standard of Service ............................... Page 6 Inventory of Facilities ............................. Page 13 Pupil Capacity ...................................... Page 16 Capital Construction Plan ....................... Page 18 Impact Fees ......................................... Page 21 Section VIII Appendices .......................................... Page 25 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 4129/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 I. Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2003. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of King County and Pierce County and within the City of Auburn; the King County Council, and the City of Auburn will adopt this Plan by reference as part of its comprehensive plan, and the Pierce County Council may adopt this plan. by reference as part of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan. To enable impact fees to be collected in Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2002-03 capacity was 13,360 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 12,703.61. The actual number of individual students was 13,427 as of October 1, 2002. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the modernization of and additions to the District's existing facilities currently underway, provides for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003, a new elementary school, and the acquisition of a new middle school site. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development area within Pierce County at the souther border of the Auburn School District as well as all other areas of the District. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, and the City of Auburn provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use the GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2002 TO 2003 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2001-02 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2003 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 2 additional classrooms at the elementary lever and 1 at the senior high level. B. Increase of 3 Special Education Rooms at the high school level. C. Increase of 1 early childhood special education classroom. D. Class size reduction funds (1-728) has created an increase of 1 additional required teaching classroom at the elementary level E. Increase of 1 TOSA reading specialist classroom for high impacted school. Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Auburn Riverside HS. Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Auburn Riverside High School. Section VI Capital Construction Plan A. One year delay in the Elementary #13 project due to reduced enrollment projections at the elementary level. B. Middle School site purchased moved up a year with passage of bond. C. Updates cost estimate based on current data for Senior High project. D. Updates cost estimate based on current data for Elementary project. E. Planning for Middle School #5 and Elementary #14 move into the 6 year window. 4/29/2003 3.1 Autwm School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO /MPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2002 to 2003 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2002 CPF 2003 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2913 0.3269 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1398 0.1621 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1703 0.1860 records of average actual student generation Multi -Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1487 0.0901 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0642 0.0221 Sr. High 0.0580 0.0510 New Facility Cost Sr. High $57,000,000 $58,500,000 1 Sr. High Cost Estimate, as of Nov 2002, is computed from completed construction documents as submitted to DDES. Elementary $15,000,000 $15,600,000 2 Elementary cost estimate from architects recent project experience and OSPI facility records. Site Cost/Acre $138,123 $146,729 Updated from final cost for recent purchases escalated to anticipated 2004 purchase date. Boeckh Index $110.32 $114.88 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beck) Match %- State 54.02% 55.88% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 45.98% 44.12% Computed District Average AV Single Family $174,311 $195,869 Updated from March 2003 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi -Family $48,949 $51,516 Updated from March 2003 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.24 $2.09 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 5.19% 4.74% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 4-03) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updates Non -Lakeland enrollment projections Appendix A.2 - Updates Lakeland enrollment projections. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 4/29/2003 3.2 4/2912D03 Auburn School District No. 408. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Aubum School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract -from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South area as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 01/02 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2002 04/05 05/06 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROD PROD PROJ PROJ GRADE 2002-2003 2003-2004 20042005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 KDG 905 937 955 975 990 1005 1019 1 900 983 1001 1020 1036 1050 1064 2 961 931 1005 1024 1039 1054 1068 3 940 995 958 1033 1049 1063 1077 4 973 958 1011 976 1047 1061 1075 5 1062 998 977 1031 991 1061 1075 K-5 5741 5802 5907 6059 6152 6293 6377 6 1104 1087 1018 998 1048 1008 1077 7 1021 1154 1130 1063 1039 1087 1047 8 1026 1042 1166 1143 1071 1046 1095 6-8 3151 3283 3314 3204 3158 3141 3218 9 1441 1261 1273 1398 1371 1297 1272 10 1234 1418 1232 1246 1367 1337 1264 11 927 1202 1381 1196 1205 1325 1296 12 933 842 1107 1288 1099 1107 1 1227 9-12 4535 4722 4993 5128 5042 5067 5058 TOTALS 13427 13807 14214 14391 14352 14501 14654 GRADES K-12 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5289 5333 5430 5572 5657 5791 5868 6-8 3151 3283 3314 3204 3158 3141 3218 9-12 4535 4722 4993 5128 5042 5067 5058 K-12 w/K 1/2 12975 13339 13737 13904 13857 13999 14144 5 4!29/2003 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County and the City of Auburn indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,741 students in grades K through 5. The 905 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5 attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K - 5 enrollment is 5,289. Four middle schools house 3,151 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates two comprehensive senior high schools and one altemative high school housing 4,535 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number -of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 -12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade_ articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines. the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DELAYED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for handicapped students at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 70 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless handicapped population grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. 4/29/2003 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Thirteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by six standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 6 rooms @ 26.5 each = (159) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (159) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 108 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for handicapped youngsters below age five. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eight standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) - 4/29/2003 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss .(106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26.5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at eight of the twleve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 moms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) 4/29/2003 9 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning programs at the middle school level for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provided a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 250 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minumum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as -a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 10/23/01 identifies 158 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 4/29/2003 10 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) STRUCTURED LEARNING PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured learning classrooms for 33 students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires fifteen classrooms to provide for approximately 400 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the thirteen teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 30 each = (420) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (420) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 4/29/2003 11 Autwm School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through Zoos STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 90% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 10/23/01 identifies 150 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,617) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,617) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,390) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,390) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (3,486) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,486) (450) 0 (450) 4/29/2003 12 4!29/2003 Aubum School District No. 4o8 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IVA shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their SPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each relocatable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1) provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2) make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3) provide housing to cover our needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on the existing physical plants. Core facilities, (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. TABLE PERMANENT FACILITIES IVA @ SPI Rated Capacity January 2002) A. Elementary Schools Building 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Washington 553 553 553 553 553 553 553 Terminal Park 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Dick Scobee 618 618 618 618 618 618 618 Pioneer 449 449 449 449 449 449 449 Chinook 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 Lea Hill 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 Gildo Rey 596 596 596 596 596 596 596 Ever Heights 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 Alpac 554 554 554 554 554 554 554 Lake View 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 Hazelwood 639 639 639 639 639 639 639 Ilalko 1 648 1 648 648 648 648 648 648 ELEM CAPACITY 1 6,745 1 6,745 6,745 6,745 6,745 6,745 6,745 B. Middle Schools Building 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Cascade 897 897 897 897 897 897 897 Olympic 960 960 960 960 960 960 960 Alternative JH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Rainier 902 902 902 902 902 902 902 Mt. Baker 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 MS CAPACITY 3,702 1 3,702 1 3,702 1 3,702 3,702. 3,702 1 3,702, C. Senior High Schools Building 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 200405 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 West Auburn Auburn Auburn Riverside 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 250 2,447 1,503 SH CAPACITY 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 COMB'D CAPACITY 1 14,647 1 14,647 1 14,647 1 14,647 1 14,647 1 14,647 1 14,647 4/29/2003 14 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE 2003-04 IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY 2006-07 2007-08 March 200 3) Cascade Elementary Location 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 8 8 10 10 10 Ever Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 TOTAL UNITS 28 28 30 30 32 32 328 TOTAL CAPACITY 742 742 795 795 8448 8 848 Middle School Location 2002-03 2003-04 200405 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Cascade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rainier 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 Mt. Baker 2 2 4 6 7 7 7 TOTAL UNITS 7 7 9 13 14 14 14 TOTAL CAPACITY 210 210 270 390 420 420 420 Sr. High School Location 2002-03 2003-04 200405 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn 12 12 15 15 12 8 8 Auburn Riverside 12 15 18 18 12 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 24 27 33 33 24 16 16 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 720 810 990 990 720 480 480 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 59 62 72 76 7062 62 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,672 1,762 2,055 2,175 1,988 1,748 1,748 4/29/2003 15 4/29/2003 1/ 3/ W 2/ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities and the elimination of the facility that formerly housed the Alternative Jr. High. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 A. SPI Capacity 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,647 16,147 16,797 16,797 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity -New Sr. High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,854) (1,764) (1,471) (1,222) (1,510) (1,750) (1,750) 12,793 12,883 13,176 14,925 15,287 15,047 15,047 C. Net Capacity D. ASD Enrollment 13,427 13,807 14,214 14,391 14,352 14,501 14,654 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (634) (925) (1,039) 533 935 546 393 CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude Aft JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) Include Relocatable 1,672 1,762 2,055 2,175 1,988 1,748 1,748 Exclude SOS (pg 12) (3,486) (3,486) (3,486) (3,357) (3,458) (3,458) (3,458) Total Adjustments (1,854) (1,764) (1,471) (1,222) (1,510) (1,750) (1,750) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2002-03 1 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 A. SPI Capacity 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,647 16,147 16,797 16,797 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity -New Sr. High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,526) (3,526) (3,526) (3,397) (3,498) (3,498) (3,498) 11,121 11,121 11,121 12,750 13,299 13,299 13,299 C. Net Capacity D. ASD Enrollment 13,427 13,807 14,214 14,391 14,352 14,501 14,654 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,306) (2,687) (3,094) (1,642) (1;053) (1,202) (1,355) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude Aft JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) Exclude SOS (pg 12) (3,486) (3,486) (3,486) (3,357) (3,458) (3,458) (3,458) Total Adjustments (3,526) (3,526) (3,526) (3,397) (3,498) (3,498) (3,498) 1/ New facilities shown in 2006-07 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 24% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 21% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non -classroom spaces (commons, library, theater) as well as rented space which violates the District's standard of service. 4/29/2003 17 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. The District is projecting an additional 1227 students within the six year period including the Lakeland area. This increase requires the construction of a new high school, a new elementaryschool, and the acquisition of a new middle school site during the six year window. A new middle school and an additional elementary school are anticipated just beyond the six year time frame for this plan. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. �s 4129/2003 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school is schedule to open in the Fall of 2005. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2001-08 Capital Construction Plan March 2003 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Cost Source Mar -03 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 All Facilities Yes $37,268,354 1996 XX Modernization Bonds All Facilities - 1998 Technology Yes $8,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap Lev Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Surplus New Elementary Yes $2,800,000 Property XX School Sale Property Purchase New Middle No $5,000,000 XX School Elementary #13 No $15,600,000 XX XX XX plan const open Elementary#14 No $16,875,000 XX plan Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX Ian Bond New Sr. High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX XX XX XX Fees plan const const open 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level. 20 4/29/2003 4129/2003 NQ LL O M O' O M„'. O 0 LL M h O O) tbe 19 i�� X N tp LL O O p V O �� o CO U E ;- LL O N p U V 0 x �. oo N C4 0 0 O L. Qp 0 ��ts 0 0 0 L 0 O CD 2 60 0 a 5 C O O V a a 0NM OLLp 0 y O co . .Q O.�� 0) OCR �. � N W U c L L a �� (Z:,ccQ�GO 69� O c O a LL Q O) LL O 11 CR OR O p N m LOL N to p O O O 5 O O O LLL O a Cao O LL N 0 COD (7 O C? .+ Co O O O U OO O Ln t r IM m Ipo to CD,O q m O CD b E Q (D 0N q O) O a 0 O O N m co tb co LL V .CO 00 p-. a O O O O C j 3 O O C 0 ttf N to 40 `o o U. w a o m E E -r a or O Oo ~ �N O N O 3 r O X y Eov- LL 0 0 o CO 0 0 0 2 � .CD cq LL O N m :3 30 V 0 x �. oo N V 0 0 O L. Qp 0 75 0 0 0 L 0 O CD 2 60 0 a 5 C O O V a r N'T y O co . 0 4 U LL N a p U LLc L a O CD � LLQ O c t_ O c O a LL Q O) LL O 11 8 LL c v _ Co wiin M OI CO_ tO W !A Co LL w In v L v_ Q C CD O 3 LL O N CND O m N '000 R p C _a m v= C7 O CD M Ll (� O m� l4 wftz C4 m aOrO C 0 0 0 p C C O O O C C O O O pA In LL fA LL fA O` O Q a! 3 A A Ln Li N LL LL CR OR O p N m LOL N to p O O O 5 O O O LLL O a Cao O LL N 0 COD (7 O C? .+ Co O O O U OO O Ln t r IM m Ipo to CD,O q m O CD b E Q (D 0N q O) O a 0 O O N m co tb co LL V .CO 00 p-. a O O O O C j 3 O O C 0 ttf N to 40 `o o U. w a o m E E -r a or O Oo ~ LL a V O x 3 Of X y Eov- o CO O L � � Y � 2 � .CD cq s O N m :3 30 V N p 0 x �. oo N In O V X L. Qp 0 CD LL L 0 O CD 2 C) N a C OX V a r N'T y O co . 0 4 U LL N a p U LLc L a O CD � LLQ O c t_ O c O a LL O) U LL 3 8 v a V O x 3 X y o O O O L � � Y � 2 � .CD cq s o` um a � m V 00 ga X c LL o COD�ko Q a C p O O r N'T y 0 o Ja a U U LLc L a O Y CD � V O O c t_ O c O a O O A O O) W 3 3 8 x to O c v _ Co wiin M E CO_ tO W !A Co LL w In v L v_ Q o f 3 o a I m c C _a m v= Ln w O LL l4 wftz v a V O x 3 X N x O O O L � � Y � 2 � .CD cq s V% o 0 um a � m V 00 O O LL COD�ko U M O t%1 U- y 0 o U U LLc w O Y CD � T � N eN- U- O A O O) :! U co E _C CO c v _ U- wiin c v_ E V � � a V O x X CO N O O O L � � Y � 2 � .CD cq um a � m � x M 0 o U LLc T 4 O Y CD � ll LL eN- LD c u a E CO c v_ E CO_ LL W !A Co LL w In k L oLL 2} « 2co % ®ate 't oo/B�m - � GF* E 2249a —2 a 0 # LU LL z } E § � _ � 6 2 � 8 §a » \ � I40 � `«- co f*.: ^ 0#■ _« « in a p&0-& # � 643, - C4 M) k a . o V _ k f } 6s, \ \ / a.) k 0 _ wv $ § LL w 3-■ .. 2 0 0 «} ■ 8c ® � d x s �© Q E -• 2 f w w \ C, J /- ■ % E ! § � ° § 0 >c R �8 # CL I e2 § k > k a LL 7� °% & _ a © « > $ \ } W- $ $ �2 � f 5 a m / ELL LL C14 k - A q- 10 0- @% q ®ate oo/B�m - � GF* & C4 2249a —2 a m LL 401. ur � � # � � » a � ga%CD\q 0#■ a p&0-& # � 643, - C4 M) k a . o V _ k f } 6s, \ \ / a.) k 0 _ wv $ § LL w 3-■ .. 2 0 0 «} ■ 8c ® � d 3 & m Q E -• a E w w aaa � LLU C14 k - U N $ 0 CL U is p 121 to O 0 N J Q y$ 8 .0.. .3 L CO O 'O C Q c LL o O $ W LO O d O 00 I -- Cb Q O O co O N P. O 0 0 0 ►O N N tO ab! V ff99 N� � tA N N U W O a U .- N r, CO CO Ln � n O O o Lo O n N m .0 LO M OMD L V a so e- N N � Q. 0 H so CL 0 L Q N W cli O O) 01 0 O) O r r GV m Ln O " O O N to O OO to IN r N -- m G) O N N IT co C14 O O O oO 01 n bM v 0 00 m N O)p aR a � mM 1-7 N v Cl) co � 409, In �O) G9 -7v� J L N N O r f` h V p GOD N O O) IL� O OD O O NlO 0 CID O O m LO O J: O lA O O to V � to � O N 00 00 GD L` OA m M m C14 LO O O ' W Y C) LO O p m m m N G m pj L vj O) O ,7 GOD O --t � L646 to c C r r O O � Q a _ m O r- CO -W V to� m C� tS OD CM m co O) O1 0) OD W O 04 cq lO 7 L6 Cl) v O n OCD O cc lO IT v t9 L U co co CV 0 Im N n r N a M t, co C-4 O) m OD O ur W m oco pp COON9 O M p FA N M �_ lO O O It GOD O 't lti R O O to WD. r r ti .: E LO O O Co p O 10 N A N GD Go to co N a 000 O) M c N fA < C LO � O(n p GOD v O LG) O n NM O vj to B O O Lko a O 7 e» to 0 y N v O C �+ N a p 28 1 g U. m H W i; Y o c 0 Q o U UCL U o = E o o `o .0° ` o W N NT T T L Ly rai p W pp U O U p` 9 2 N L y O O a ^ ,p LL W r- Q o d U a, '0O � O>fLco o N Opp N ~ V y O to «O N N 3 a U y 16 M 3 .Q 0 N C 8 O LL LL Op m 7 a O � Lt, �a O o m M W O N M to OMO m Q G$ O } V O >, U O U O a a 3 N >. a N .4. a r N O m C L� L a O 4 a a a E lCl Q: L co co co 3 a S mQ = E Q m 8 Q a E E E E Ed 3` 0 0 0) a t`n w ¢ a`o a COtan in m a to- LL Li LL U €U' d �T O) w O O 0 0 O Q O O O Co C i 00 O O 4 0 m O aU a C U ° a_ ° MO w x Ir U U OLL Q a g 8 W LL Q LQ t1 w LL O a E E iR LLcr ` C GOO 16 a LL a a O Q U N to aN a.Fo Lam. > Q (n m E U) Z Z Fo- H fn to E Fo- FO- ?R tan L O C7 U N $ 0 CL U is p 121 to O 0 N J Q y$ 8 .0.. .3 L CO O 'O C Q c LL o O $ W LO O d O 00 I -- Cb Q O O co O N P. O 0 0 0 ►O N N tO ab! V ff99 N� � tA N N U W O a U .- N r, CO CO Ln � n O O o Lo O n N m .0 LO M OMD L V a so e- N N � Q. 0 H so CL 0 L Q N W cli O O) 01 0 O) O r r GV m Ln O " O O N to O OO to IN r N -- m G) O N N IT 4/29/2003 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 4/29/2003 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2002 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 year) and a short (6 year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 — Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments — page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This.data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on Octobei 1 of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1— Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 — This set of tables, found on pages 5 through 13 utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.1 3A, 3E.6A (pg 7) — breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3M.13, 3M.6, 3M. 13A, 3M.6A (pg 8) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH. 13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) — breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. N O O N L m V 0 z 0 U w 'I 0 Ix IL f - z w X z w z w O H N H U 0 U z m Q N 1D I N In l7 t7 R § M < N �pM Op1 � m 00 D pMp� N § . N l7 <�V A � M N � l�f8p �Np N N .N Ol M h h NnCID OOItA(0) N In m om IA N N? CD R ti N O N_ 01 pN� W Nco N N W) m N N N co N m v 1n N .- N M N g14S C � MRN aI� N N 8 � N O ID W !O 0 m co co 0 N O O r ! 01 cm a Ncc* QO O 1 e UWBJiae c�i G' c'v�cr c9i� aI� N N 8 � N O ID W !O 0 m co co 0 N O O r ! 01 cm a Ncc* QO O 1 EW..O= d' oam z Z Z J 10 w h 6 tW7 N IN �.. tb m N N t-�CD oOp�� Nm M� IA N f7 CD m aD eD N N M W Y Wh M � d �f N N Mli 4 Q d. J co 0 = m d' Q K Q W< m N O O r O av N N N N I6 N .►off' ................ `.Sim::`•:$?: O } COX t1i° 0 W �NMdl6mhma� 0 r« 0« o««««« O p o o 00 C a 0 1 C $ L C O v V U U V ti D_ as a as m 'C N aM0 V v v v M N 5. C9 JO M N N m m m m m aD N N N m N N Ol Obi m Of CdD b b b b J J Y Z j 1� j m tm0 � m aD N m m h 1� aD h m aD 01 CD OD FF}Z-- W to U)p p [ U W W 2 fb tt m N N r N_ pip r 1 m6 coO 8 Q' N N Q0) U (dV Np 1a6D m N •M- •~- N O O M O m 1J U. CO f- aD M W m I6 d 1n tD' M OD O ► : O N m cD N m t0 tb O �t�pp� .�- OpD N O h dD N Z' J m a N o n v v M M "f 10 m t� — CO m— a N N N N N tV N N N N M N N N N r LL. J _ J d l6 m h aD a O N M d l6 m h m a 0 N M d 0 h m 0 0 0 �OaLLOCCC�CCCm°0m.mmmmaom ©m�g��' a QGo di nZOrOZI- �r-r- 1-1,- 0 wCOD 1010-CODIm acs W 7 U J Z b N m 16 !'7 a a M M m M t� d N 8 0 1D I6 M �- 16 m 1� N S o cp O LL � � M n OD. N Q N W)� O � � h N � v!N m t0 O N OD t0 � � 1�7 Vi� UQ m m m m m 10 d -q '�f .f'Q l N N N N m CD m m 4D t-: 1` Go m tz m h V- co 1z N h 1- 1- 1-- V 1A {dp 8 d p p c(�V 16 D '2 S N< W) M N O O fV 1f1 lh cV O O m � am0 m m c? W m Ql tp d m O a pQ�� m aQ: � pj M M O a O t_ 06 Cip .- N YV N lh M 16 d h h 16 M— - m d d d d d d ED Q p Fa-• ] I r m o 11( m n m g C Ol c0 O Nfli 1l O A O N m N 8 N O J a 0 0 a m M M M M MN N N d 1A m m P- GO m ap a s m m N N N N N N N N N N N m N N .-- — r- .- .-- — — — .-- — e-- — — N N O [-<L.) OhCOaOt- 1D a O N M Co t� aZMmr r�r-►�rl-r.rl-l�mcom ao m a asLL w}�iaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�sCr,a°a26aa�aa-aaa v D) cm W 0- g88�$N�q$gga.", O av N N N N I6 N .►off' W `.Sim::`•:$?: O } COX t1i° 0 W �NMdl6mhma� 0 r« 0« o««««« O p o o m Y N M d 16 m P m a C a 0 1 C $ L C O ti d m 'C N aM0 M M N 8 M Mo?oa16 M Co N� h m 1! m d W McgdM cp aD m In O tV �f N cp cy > 00 0D_' O N lo Y— N 0 d tb m hal N M d 16 m h M 0 a « « « « ««« LL O wa 1L E v D) cm W 0- O av N N N N I6 N .►off' `.Sim::`•:$?: O } ::>`''' coo %:';-'•:: Q ti 1A N aM0 � ti N io RMi, .W- W O N Q W Y— N 0 d tb m hal aU. M LL v D) cm W 0- N O O N m O U O N z O H U w 3 O lx IL H z w S z w t - z w 0 co F- U J O O U z m Q m §M O t U) m m h O h ION S N N l0 1n t` V m t0 M jvc 0 N n N l7 O S O aR fNV d a�o�irn g a N��oq 0 c O_o c 0 E 0 U)f` O M ON N N O W a 0) OOf co Orn $ 0 0 -- -- �- O a �moi Y aa..�$0a)0)0 ---- in E 0 'o Up) th < t0 N ti INh n ti 8 m aD m � 0 C) OOON E a o ) ) to ) D O) O im $ tai o z pp�� O Cl) In I7 0 r CD N N ~ O N iR c a00))rn06S'a6rnaa$mm��c`n$o 0 oCO app a, N t40 1� n N aornrnrnrna000rn � �o N Ln m N WO NCON 2Oa. I, O S S nOo D^WO OI O a0 V M C', a3 � , r� �mmmm IACD �o U) th N O ►, com 10-0CD Q a .- V tN i . N tN I is O it t._ m j 9 8CD W to Of O V, C4 :: a /'7 U N r. g� m� V armmm?h�o�wv� c� N QR Of fV O '. 0- n m Obi N 7 m th a��mmma�a ov $ o "�n^ §AFAam oN o ��mm o�aa Co OOH m $ m m m( Q O N M 1n 0- tO I� h U) 1n O O l7 N N S °D ($ao$2b$$a�� p§ n `f t�m'Cly)vg rmicoc�n IN�mNr a o G) S S W A O r N O v p O M h m th N W CO O) � tp q O) S O Q Q W S N O S a 0 0 v n r � 00— vCni ��r�e� cnrnao °D�v�v �.:a 10�o ='c c J Qen N N �M.P fh NOONS) OO U — — N on a(7 eO A C am Q m a w O. J 00 J O m '.7 Q 0— N M V U) m K m O d 0 H INS IM 0m W O) 2 � - �! u�u� t4Kgg�Q IL 000 o0wrn'�tna�o�: .PQM {_pso� N t0 S .a U m Q w J � - 0 n N O O r TF d W a to O N O C_ Q N O O N `m a 0 O vs 2 O F- U w n O w a F - Z W M i J t� dt Z LU F - Z w D co F- U H 0 J O U U) Z Ix m Q :) m��Y N 1 n O1 0a oogm� a -- n W N N V N 0 W a N M In V) IL a a a a Oto n a N p� � M � O w cm cm CL O to n n n t0 N N ap m N a. 0) 0) (7) (m 0 O A (D n O In a O U) chi a cr n o a rn aND W W r- O o_ o W �O NOD N coOa/pNN r-p�Odgco i OCa9W 8�—NlnQNnN :aaoIID cDaaaae. a� riEi pN� n O O !7 N a n tD Ol �f ti N �ca�mooa nano�� t,go� n.o $oDaaa ICEa�0 0 Onl Ont O. O N la7 O Wj O N O rr r O J iY::p�OIA O �f nNOa N'MN�NaC9U� :::p�oggaaS�ooC4aaln-- to U c a a'®a ea J O a � J Im QYr-NenvLotOnlDa�:-�Ha ai O -111 Om AN S a Ow �o�l°9ilan d: a (V O CL � 0 N Qs N �• a a a '°5 nuD NA19SD4 a'O a$�GnOOe-N C4—.0 IL .- O y�� O aD O �N, CD lCD 0 0 N CL ° IL O N N CD Irc CL W Q CDD Q ell-- O CL lt� aDtp r) aOl a CD l� 25 �t lOn O l g t� o: g v> n n w tom 4 n ar ID ?R 0 9ci:Ei Wit 0 F::AA L'14 nJ::.� a s tD m ED N r N C-4 r p SOD 'co a6 a � ; O c� �l� � � a 0 O 4:Em HIE ::bnom< a w 00 C]Zj m 4 NmaNaDnaDa Ix O N O O r m I CD W CL CW) O N O L Q N O O r I` N Q W a - co O N O L Q m /70 pntfl m .� etMNm Nm ti�mmm 00000 j ol!ggO M o O W O��etf�Oni °$ RD RD tr) st Ln V OD N nmmCD0 Y m 00800 v as� 2MtOONI� _comm fl x6 mom—mm N CDw .� O V V) 0 a m��w a a a,�� N z 0 VN N N Q �_ 17 W QQw0' `"�CD0)Q r w i d Lf) m m O O QDD co mm�u�v� N n vow N s C n z O 3.w W r O n6mcom et 0 pNp ^8PI umi wo 0 0� NMN O_ v IA Ogg wwwww N mmwww $ www $' „ z W O m0 t7N(7wl� rl �� N O mNpn�A N. to m) 00)i l7nnn 00a _ 1�f�j F)a 0)M z CID 0W Qni O g W o1- r - Q p 0) W v p�nmt M(wVQD!V Q W w w am n w W Ol w w w w w w F- mv�vg 0w ?� o wma_o 81400) -- o �nwvv X0 gw�� g �g g Dom 0 g O It U) U) wo n v min �n t- w o wwww _ a�j m ��iwnwewt m N 0f ml7N �w CDM�lQ�pl �W :...... w 8 wn p ne ' :} O : o o r o r� N w a Coo �..'.m 8 m ,q a N 5� C ate.' .:� N gng C C qn Q QS� g C C O iKg�g o= .�:: 0 w w w o a :_s: 0 o� oIL d ........ oa .. oa. ......... W 2 O Q W 0 W `o N t'7 et Ip LL! Q •- N !9 et tp r' Q •- N !9 Q N Q r N l9ui d C* C9 ui (� M N O O r I` N Q W a - co O N O L Q m O O N cc Mo w 1A a N' 8000� r a ;. N �a N 45wa�� CL rN C-" a� N CD W) 0) cd 0N�� , 0 �� CC aa.��0 Q O 12 pop ��p N 10 N O — a CL N W O� Q tV l0 0a�� Ir aA 6 8- N fV pg a C m co g � g (V IL l7 N r c 7R a N V a , N ao� N a�$o'rno'rO1i 1-7 -•, .- m � ' ;: au aoo25g�+�ao N N g w r aoogoo� 0 O a.o 0 fp N C,4 0 a� N 0 Q aorrnaS10 Q O 12 pop ��p N 10 N O — a a� N W O� Q tV l0 0 0 n co 02 aA 6 8- N fV pg a C m co g � g (V Q: � g CL a0- v a O NLn ��a�a°r r •• a�$o'rno'rO1i Ir $ o a a � ZS�Neov a 10 NO N b cr $ Q IL wcoo�R°Re� p y IL ... W O � 0� l�NioR IL ma•c::::0 M. M. o(4r i5R :m �m0� o A ICE o�nN m O M -CL � N m .� N 'I'L r'..... C C •• �g;C J osNoo r r N Ss :C J :m Uo.-o- LL,_: IL Cb ma co ~ oIL e0a W m mN �Dgtl�r�s gi r. OD 0 a r C6 am►. a40 � 0. 1 �� 0 If o 0- 0 IL Ir V-3 a 0 �_ w 40 IL N ZR a ares w •- r N A iR a0 3 a g o m iv -•fo�Cor�R a § 1 o ^o I Ir CL N p� a IL i€ a v " N 0 a pcEt'�0 �►IL co C4 ,n J . c c ?"g� mNr� s_ =c c a F-- D Qy <OP ao�a t7 ro ao m1 CD c0 a co 0 N O LZI CL � m au N a� O — a rA� �oo »_ Ir O NLn ��a�a°r a Ir $ o a a � ZS�Neov a 10 NO 0 $ IL wcoo�R°Re� W O � 0� IL IC -11 r g 0 c W S O M -CL + N m .� 'I'L ii• r r N R LL,_: IL Cb �Dgtl�r�s gi g If C2=-• J M W::p:< 3`�ry:DQQ�NN1nOCI m O O . c c e e r- 0) o ——— eo o= m.06 : Q 0 a' 0 UJ J Q co <JID 1 10 OD 0- 0 IL Ir V-3 a 0 �_ w 40 IL N ZR a ares w •- r N A iR a0 3 a g o m iv -•fo�Cor�R a § 1 o ^o I Ir CL N p� a IL i€ a v " N 0 a pcEt'�0 �►IL co C4 ,n J . c c ?"g� mNr� s_ =c c a F-- D Qy <OP ao�a t7 ro ao m1 CD c0 a co 0 N O LZI CL N O O N L m a 0 L� O N Z O v W 7 O w CL I. - Z W 'i 0 W. Z W I -- to m Q NICO N OI;;;Im M r F O O�cQimNo v� CL M N 0) ci 0 V) (�� N0 CL o NN�� N .�- O O N �::: 0::m J m = H co oI`r - o §I- O M Q l7 N m Nlvin a O CL 0 'O �$:rC, C'4 CL r N::: S�EEI 0h Q QD � � V) CDaD a0 O NO (Ff J C C �ii c�QNN<�M(7C7z:: p m we) if) Qpp co N N v> r•oo�� op�ptoco cn coco gy�pp^ C g o�coo�R 7 C,7S�''r�R'om Y��N`'a&f0m N D_ O .a- .- O O Q Q N *v; M F O� J ss H��N��s_(7 c f O .- .- O O) p p��Ir N_ A Ons -S�!V CO It ct 00a�� IL o O N O Flom IL O p N :M- _jDw Ol W O _ QOD---C4 O A H -,) t0 W N v IL $ o 0�coNor��c� r D_ Q O to ItRr L o -3OWE m N is c �a N_ p� NN �= 0 R � 0' N O Q r is s e7R [9 hO o N CL 04 N �Qp app 05(`INO� a ,d R a •- •- �7 N J C G 0) M CL W O o a' A 0 'cl C4 C4 4 01 N O O r C) CD CD I cc 0 - co co O N O L Q v m O v O z O_ U W O It IL F - z W S v z W F - z. LU 0 F- H U H co O J O Z U H z m D a Co m C) CO n. O N O tS 0u�►u� O(oca� 0 °(o Oo�oil O m CLCL cr 90, it wa5 0�1p14 W-4 CL qW _ v i 1)p a� W- a aa C1 fair IL d?(4i p p M a. Q a"�v Q M CL r N 0 Nei '7 N '7 N 0 O n _N pp O !8� p �pp� a °- 0 CID tC O Goo K C M O Gp O AW' M IL CL tL — N fV a a �. aoaW'ow IL a I a� � iR°i L 08 08 1 08 M CL O N N r M OD -01 x 6 v n ow- r W� x M M d' CL IL a0 �C a0 N a0 v v ap.-•- -� r NvtWr)� a: OU 'h ow 'O�tiRO�vN � d$W oODCO 8v C C w o i8 M (7) ooOOD(co a vv a� e9i IL 2 tQi a 8 aoastoom� aovvvv ao .„In„. a CL L O� u�ivO1i� Ogv�vr t� r r f` N N N N V)� Otr�(•tri� S M �� M Q' 1'' a 0 tD Oo p O O C v Q a 0 M M M lQ a 0 d Id a W- Q M Qm Z D O U O W O CD CO l7 SMO cMp cMp IA Ip ID 10 N J N N N a 0 D O n QaQa M W U V OW P '7 Q U M en 0 t7 Do O ..aa lY vo (9a W U ` �a na U m �� a o M (a7 Oa W o U �•-m•- M H4 �a ��(o�o� C <M �� o Z V, m �m m.� m S �N NNN R' Ur SSSS y 0 n�br-tD (1) a) M Y LL! til LLl LLl C9 ui LL! W W C9 2 2 2 M CO (A to C.) Co m C) CO n. O N O tS N 0 1 0 C 011 1 m 9 C> CL Cb 0 Z '81-M C, %f*:"N N 9Is V, FO- IH*:Cf C! to in Z, C4 C4 C p01AM .6N 6 S2 1n :ID ca ago ca ...... 0 000 0 rlt * 5 V a! � P NP to so 6 6 6 0CO) Oil 1 CE < < < < W LU UJ A v RO C4 c; C4 c; 0) c—, CD N 0 .......... —C4 co Will: lh l'7 V) V) . ::W.: C24 :(4 N 0. IL M a_ ...... U al a. a. 0. 6 0 M M < < N N N 0 0 *6 A Z Alk 40 0 0 F4 co cs 0 0 0 ci !E Qat .-aa :CL0- o E v � � S2 �� °D u� � � R ��v �N 0 z a. 0 N 0:40: CD 40 C4 ...... . ...... —H: D UJ UJ W LU CO D ui w uj E cr)N V) tq::::SeN CL IL CL (L IL a. IL m 9 C> CL Cb 0 '81-M C, 9Is V, FO- IH*:Cf N.C4 to in C4 C4 cl 0) N V) N O 0 CD CP O Z Oil 1 CE C4 c; C4 c; 0) c—, N 0 .......... —C4 ui ui 0. a. 'Cis M LU W UJ !p U al a. a. 0. m 9 C> CL O C, 9Is V, O W) (n V) 10 43,10 O LQ q O 0 0 0 O C4 C4:!m CP O 66 N 0 .......... IR w ul ui ui 0. a. m 9 C> CL 0 lz z uj z W 0 0 .x U (0 z m a. a. cL cL N 0T ICA4 P't d vi 4 pi r- 0 —en Et en C4 6 N cli C4 s; D S2 CD C-4 "till". 01, m 0) :i'?:: 6n NI ID hpp A A RS C-4 C4 v Cj CJ ej cli cli co a zS ...... ...... 0 -a C-4 C4 Aw: A ZR Ci c; to 00 Lo In W M r- (4 +�r.: 04 C4 Lo 40 lco:: V. - :CD A C4 C4 t4 :Pcoo Ci GO rw- CIO 10 co p g R:co :Co. C4 :(4, F- H 28 .......... uj w Uj LU ui ui LU w U3 YJ umi a- a- a. a. IL 9L a. 0.1 a. a. UZ �Uo, -w-OaRIV; iR P.: O r— rn egg C O O l4 l7 O All m CO .D iR P.: O r— egg C O All m CO .D 3 0 d 46 V A ZR CR O d N 8 C4 cowi:-Cm cm C4 m w w w w co 0 C4 0 C4 < co a op RvrNi�iv 04 cx E 0 Ci2 O.Co C4 To C CL r 0 a le cri Ol 0 F- co co a: AC ta I N co r- co r - NP; > > < < u W Cb Im cm S c to ' c c m a SZ 2 D =) 0 ca *a O N IL jr 0000 z od m:': to (a LU =Fc F: 1 :?r!:. 1% D w w w w to 00 m m x Ir a. a. al.......... < < < W LLI W UJ ., a- a._ CD CD Z < .. < IL IL CL a. 0 < < 0 0 m 0 O z < S OFT= SIM a- IL HS 0 E Z 0 z CL 0 C4 0 C4 < co a op RvrNi�iv 04 cx E 0 Ci2 O.Co C4 To C; CL r 0 0 C4 0 C4 < co a op RvrNi�iv aR ZR ZR O.Co C4 To C; SR Ol V ov): 9: 1- F- co co *$&POE N co r- co r - NP; C4 C? In :.M: In co co v 6 c; O N C; od m:': _j en m 1 :?r!:. 1% D w w w w to 00 m m a. a. 0 * 20 < co a op RvrNi�iv aR ZR 0 c; To PIR SR Ol F- co co *$&POE N co r- co r - NP; In :.M: In co co v 6 c; O N to to _j en m 1 :?r!:. 1% D w w w w to 00 m m a. a. 10 * 20 < 0 C a op RvrNi�iv aR ZR 0 c; cnIm m 0 SR Ol F- co co *$&POE co r- co r - In :.M: In co co v o to 1 :?r!:. 1% D w w W fq M m 0 a. a. 10e cl * 20 < 0 C a op RvrNi�iv aR ZR 0 c; cnIm m 0 SR *$&POE tp C4 IN N ui lu w lu al.......... , In lh In ., a- a._ Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections 4!29/2003 Cq to O N O) f- (D M CD st O p I� 1� r t0 Q' co O o 0 0 O O co 0 N r Or r O m Opo m a r r r r r r 40 - M v 'Cr r 0 0 `�d Oa000 w LO U) ca m M IT 001- a m m °- 0MiONi� o 0 0 0 O O .O CA N r N N r- CD r ca co a. r r r r r r = f� a O. N NP- r N O OD MO 0 0 I� O CA Co- O m co m CDm m 0 r OD 0 E O r r a0 .0 -0 -0 o0 V = a r CO to CQ C3 l4 d O tt F- r 0 F- F- F- CDNCDq aD CDLoo�eo c C Q' O LU ft r O O r r O C7 CD f- C D r n � CL r r r r r r r 0 O) 0 CA V co b N N N /- n OO w w to to CO O 1A 00 = r co CD N Of O O O O 00 O N V r LO O -044 h 04 '-;t CN O O Ch w CL O r r r r r r m r r r ---- = 0 t0 O M N O O N h h w CD 00 w m_ N O O CC) c9 Co 0 LLD. _ d' m Z c) c` b O 0 O O to N 0 00 r W N N Cl) CV N w O w m ` IL r r C.) r r r h 0 r Ip 0 U M O o N �t m O a CV) U w Z z �D 3 Q ` m O N O= ON o OD N r 0 O_ M r CO tt w (D CA 1l- co h CSD ci m co M m' Ch O00 N N CO v o dom m L a) 2 n. m m 7 v r i r (O 't1 N t a ° ` m O tl + Q o M sG r O O v c � N w ., CO CD O U = O O = O O U c o f 00 OD OD M O CO C3) ep• v U) ODD =� o O n 0 O CO � ch N O a0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0� O C, O iQ O f o = Q< a Y d C O W = 0 C CV W `tN000 CA CO 00 Mcr) r-C>r) co o) CA 0 O o0 () COD O M N V- N O Gowo CD IV a 0 r r h r r r Cy r r r m _ J U 0 O O Lu �O .0 C c W = W c m _ iii N U D O O W CV O- O N- 04 O M I M No o c Q aL r a 0 j' d oo 0 O r N m -'r w ti o m Cl O N N 4 m a to O N O) f- (D Co CD st O p I� 1� r t0 Q' co O o 0 0 O O w 0 N r Or r A N C� N coN Opo n a r r r r r r 40 - M 'Cr r 0 0 `�d Oa000 w M IT 001- w N 0MiONi� o 0 0 0 O O CA N r N N r- CD r G a r r r r r r r = q r NP- r N O OD MO 0 0 w 0 O CA Co- O w - N N 000 O 0 r OD 0 `0 O r r a0 M CN CV O o0 a r r r r r r r to r r r r r r tt r 0 cor.-oODUl)q*w M 1- O o OD OO�p CDNCDq aD CDLoo�eo c C Q' O O O O 0 0 0 ft r O O r r O C7 CD f- C D r CL r r r r r r r 0 CA V co b N N N /- n OO w w to CO O 1A 00 O r co CD N Of O O O O 00 O N V r LO O -044 h 04 '-;t CN O O Ch w CL O r r r r r r m r r r ---- le r 0 t0 O M N O O N h h w CD 00 w MCA r N O O CC) c9 Co r � d' m O O O O O O w \} O 0 O O to N 0 00 r W N N Cl) CV N w a O r r r r r r m r r C.) r r r h r Ip O O O M� w w 1(0 M w r y �) N �t m O a N r !- w N CD 'q -Cr) �D r r ON o OD N r 0 O_ M r CO tt w (D CA 1l- co h CSD O O O Cl O O M ^ co O 000M Ch O00 N N CO m dom �M��!' h v r r (O 't1 N w d' t`0 LOp M O O O O 0 O r O O N �P CO N M N w r O 00 OD OD M O CO C3) ep• v U) ODD Co O o O n 0 O CO � ch N O a0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0� O O r r r C4 zr r r r (y 0 C CV W `tN000 CA CO 00 Mcr) r-C>r) co o) CA 0 O o0 () COD O M N V- N O Gowo CD IV a 0 r r h r r r Cy r r r r J �O t0 O r 0 M N w It -0 m to N U D O O W CV O- O N- 04 O M I M No It r a W 0 0 O r N m -'r w h . CD h 00 CD o' O r CV N 1' N e - Y Y tL e r r �) Y 0 m Cl O N N 4 m a W C O w m 0 L a c m ST E Q - d O Z L U W ga u � 3 (� Q LQ LL lQ a m L) M 0 0 N c O V m 0- 00 0 v E Z z C v W w � O C ga u c m 3 3 C1 Q IL R M l0 v M O O N 0 a m a� 0 0 �t � N N� N ° 3 0 O .0 Q 1► to 'n M � m -Q o 0 0 � tl) m Z h am°'pmt m V w h Q a y ?00 tO v N M M> r--: m o AO dt� QUc� c9 lop. m ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00;C34 0 0 m a� 0 0 �t � N N� N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 O st "tN (4 tO (O CL C) t0 'n M � m NgTWr-Pl�URUu �00o�ot— am m ca r� ►� is r� of ao r--: 6 ` MO ?00 tO v N M M> r--: _ > AO dt� QUc� Q CL 14 qn _ Lf) r- N to O <O � a COL m Q� tU Oi • OOD 00 CO N N C aornrnrn00000��o�� r - } t7 t cc CL 06 _m J2 U) 41 a r N M .Zrtp fO 1., O O O � N .- 6F Y ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00;C34 0 0 m a� 0 0 �t � N N� N = O st "tN (4 tO (O CL C) t0 'n M � m am Cm ` MO ?00 tO v N M M> r--: _ > AO dt� QUc� aN M tO tO /� CD CA m r - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 m (D N (D O Vt OR R V O (O It M It m (O O CO N O N M tp "*T*CA N N MN N tp N CL C) 3 am m ` m N k 49 a0 N mM j m Ic cc to M _ > > m t7 t ra W OD O ,t O V o 4 co O O LL C O N a 0 O O C Nco CO C- CO co m O O t p m O .a C70' r O o 000 N N O I-- co COO O N O C O N V m CO N O O 0 O O M O O C G: W O CO o N v — d O y Z L CO N n r co O C UJ O CO N co C4 a W U W � N w CO � V CO OO r Q W LL .- W a CQ L) h C') O O y: O }: N N ra M O N OD ,t O o _ co O O OD O N�t N OMpLO 0 N O Nco CO C- CO co N O p N O C70' r O o 000 N G I-- co COO O T O N co CO N m h O 0 O O M O O O G: O O N N y O CO N n r co O U) O O CO N co C4 0 et co N CO CO O CO OO r N O .- r N N h h O N y: rN }: O N 00 N Q n N b N: O N b N N J c� C' U) c O to T C5 ti M N L C; N G OO N •-OM O t` D � T uN} CSV N LS A ON �: C14 Cn O r �. 0 F- O M co ? C O CD h h CD � m 00 w m�C7C7 W W Q O: W. ML N: co O O N 9 M o rn C T . N M- r cf O O CA 3 V N N r r 30. r O N N uy. : T O O e-> r N CA 't r N N N Ofi CC3! M O r - O N V M Ott O N O N O r�: O O St O e} 0 N N 0) N Cb O N lr3 d d O N It v JN N wr O r N r e N N fA CC .�: N N C w= — T Cp to w z to !9 $J >• C LL W - a �: M j LLL m = h_ 4 a o- LL ELL CL� 4 0 m a a`r o LL • C (� ~ m ,Q O W Y D U m w i� Y t J O a J O I co Co 0 _N It CD d' 7 `—m LoO o CO t0 F, co co N V N r- to m 3 'O Nco CO C- CO co N O N r CD Lf co G I-- co COO O T N co CO N m h O p M M M O T N y O CO N n r co O U) O O CO N co C4 0 N CO CO O CO OO r T (}> C) •-" Lo 00 T M CO CO N N N OQ9 U) r N O y: .- 0) r CT e- CN N co 00 N Q n N b N: OO N b N J c� C' U) c O to T C5 ti M N L C; N G OO N CA �.. CO N M T N A ON �: C14 Cn O r �. 0 F- Y CO CA ? C O CD h h CD � m s.}� w m�C7C7 W W Q o t 9 M o rn C a m tJ E O 3 V N N CL 3 a W Q 0 F- r r I" r t` ti 0 O r co to fl- 0 O co m Q p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r M _ r r r r r r r O N Or r M U) t` 0 O � DD ' ^ 0)(D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r� O O) 0 0 0) O r r r r r r r M O r O N O r- M O h 0 O C) -,t 'T U) 0o o o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r- r M O r r r r r r r r r N 0 O M (� fM U.) r- m r M U) U) CO O r O M O O O O O O O O O O O r r r M O r r r r r r r r r N CD oN M st (O 00 O N N N (D Q) 0 0 0 OD 0 O O) O O O O O O r O r N (0 V- U) N O p tO n fl- Ih h CO 00 w M OI N r LO O N O t` fA O N M N N N CO 00 h N f j p Cl) Cl) It tt T V ct 't �t tt �f v O Cl M O fO N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N O r OD O O O 0) 0) O 0) 0) Or 0) 00 r 00 r N w q Y r N PM'* U) co h 00 0)C> CIJ O 3 W E O 0 0 0 f" 0 f,- M r N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- (O 7 r r r r r O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O ofG y� O N h O m i N N M M M M� M M (fl fO M N r r r r r r r r r r r r r Op N 0 M ct U) O U) st w O 0 M� 00 O r r r r r r r r r r r r r a `v � o U) Mr U) to U) W w 0 w O f- w M� Or N r r r r r r r r r r r r r O 4 0 0 0 0 r r O O O M M r w CD r N N N N N N N N N N N r N O N d O MO r r r r r r r N N r r N V O N 0 w 7 .0 Cl) 0 N M d U) U) U) O U) U) U) O) n U) M r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N O of 'C 0) Q O `- W N a 3 o a o a @ OO Nti IR tv Z 0 v N oN'f F- _ W > W W c� _ ° o 0 0 0 0 o v o o v a a o 0Q m @ 0 O m A M O h N et O P h @7 M m m O d M O r m tO OR h 0 J O► @ 3 0 W OOD 0 0 0 0) 00) NQ0 co Q Z II W w J � M h Y r N M V U1 �O n CO 0 H (� CL 3 a W Q 0 F- r r I" r t` ti 0 O r co to fl- 0 O co m Q p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r M _ r r r r r r r O N Or r M U) t` 0 O � DD ' ^ 0)(D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r� O O) 0 0 0) O r r r r r r r M O r O N O r- M O h 0 O C) -,t 'T U) 0o o o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r- r M O r r r r r r r r r N 0 O M (� fM U.) r- m r M U) U) CO O r O M O O O O O O O O O O O r r r M O r r r r r r r r r N CD oN M st (O 00 O N N N (D Q) 0 0 0 OD 0 O O) O O O O O O r O r N (0 V- U) N O p tO n fl- Ih h CO 00 w M OI N r LO O N O t` fA O N M N N N CO 00 h N f j p Cl) Cl) It tt T V ct 't �t tt �f v O Cl M O fO N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N O r OD O O O 0) 0) O 0) 0) Or 0) 00 r 00 r N w q Y r N PM'* U) co h 00 0)C> CIJ O Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey 4/29/2003 El s E cu ^- _ c: W U) V ) MOM O CO O CO 0 O O O O 0 T O O f` O r to to O O N O M It It O N O r r M I- I1-000NTOO fl- �1-t toLom000CDMto0U) 0 0 0 M M INT 0 T 0 - 0 i M M M m0 N to w0 0 O O to to I` N 0 M fl_ r-- 1-t O N r O O O N T r Cp Cp CD f• 0 2 M to (O T CO CD Cq T N N N N 'q f- coCO O CD h fl_ (O U') I Co � M In N Mr - O) CO Jto (p M fD t) O O O O O r O 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 m LL C C MTf*-011- ON NNN0Nt0Nst000M0M00t0Nl-000eMNMOCMC0 ofl-MOtitoOOOMCMIhCOO tiNOf-COOMO 0.0M O T N N T O N N N 0 T 0 T T r- O r- N N N 0 cM 0 t0 0 O M,%t O M 0 O 0 N r- 0 0 1l-to0000o O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 T T T T 1- T O O T M N M r O r m= O O O O 010 O O O O O O O O O O11 O O O O C c C mM01�OTopCOOhMNOTttOtnMOst.1N0 MCDcoO�0co0OM to 00MON000to0T T t0 0toetN0 10 'D 0MNI'*Nt�tnCD00TN �_ OONTOI-ChCh00000CD00000NMO(L)ttrONeh�Cp(DTNMCD0 OTr�tNTTOr000rNC7rMl0TNNrOTnTOOTetTTNTr 0 Oa 000660 000000000000070000000 m hM 00N 0 NN00inNOtoOOM1`ti0t-00000N N14' o0 r` M w COCOMON00M00to0NTOtDOOM0N�N0Lo0OtnTmCD00pOmm m 00 0 0 0 0 00 CO T f� O T N O N h O M r C7 �t 1� 0 1� O t0 O M co O N W TN 00000000000000000000 CMt011� cMql�00clUA gCMNOclll�"'tNNCONONNT,,�-7 C) O 104LOMO 7T TM C)0 0 OO x00000 CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-,,c, o 0 OR 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 o 0-.-o, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o,, 0 0 0 m -C-l: COj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��// O w T r T T T T T T T T r T T r T T r T T T T T T T r r T T r T T T r N '-TU.) O N N Lf)T <D N O CO 7 0 0 0 CD N N 0 M p O N 00 T O S11, N 10 O CD 10 r tn ONO Il- OrTTOp(pTe}'�}'T TCO�MTIt NNM11O NCoL0M0 C r 0 :3 U UO y N 'It N O to N tor CO N O CO r 0 0 CO CO N 0 Cl) O O N 0 r O et h N to O CO CD TtOONOI- CArrrCpCpTqctd T rCD ItNNt'MsTO if NCD to MO U r T 10 La r r Co N to 00 h d' M M N 0 to M T N Co 0 0 0 0 N T 0 ti M O co 0 0o 0 M <n M O L N r N T T r T r r T N w N 2 ThN00MOMTMr0CoNONNNCorN TTN etN0TOMr0'It N r N T r r r T T T r N T T p N 'O N Co r O f` 00 0 Color 00 O CO r O N to rN 0 CD r N I-- f` N r N 0 0 co CO N r M T Cl) N d T T M T T N N-cr t0 _m W m m m m m m m m m m m m m CTs m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CL LL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLti.LLLLILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL,LLLLLLLLLL ILL tL F-- m - m m - m - m - m - m - m - m - m - m m m m m m m m m m m m m Cf) m m m m m m m m m a - - cm - cm - a - cm - a - - lM - - - - - - - - - - cm - a - - - - LO C_ C_ _C C_ C_ C_ C C C C _C _C C C C_ _C C C _C _C C C C C C C C_ C C_ C G fA V) F U) i0 _C Vi U) N in ui _C fn ui _C (D U) (n N C O Y •> � Y U m Y m Y m N T N N m Y t2m m > a a O N O 0 C w O Z m N a) C Y m > .` m m (gym y > _O m >_ N ._ Cn W U> .+ 2 m — >O -- C CL m W m O p h m .0 m m N w a> L n' m (� c m C c m mn, m c a cd p� °o-- v_; vi m m c m m 0)m cpm m CM OQ 4) "S o o� 3 _c c� ami o rn c� 2 2 m m �� a, 'd W'aT c W m o o~� m O O C 0-- m �a �a Ec�aa�� L m m � CD 3m y N m cm Go m W CLA QQQa000UU�OW m m m m O m m W m W E> W WSJ�aa'a'�t m> m C O O O>> 001 L -F .mC -F LLL -F -F-> m ) 0) MOOgr,U-)wMM MCDO CV) d MI C+! m M OO O I� 00 r r N t0 OMOOr-i- Or Nr O F- 00 r-000000 0 N LL r-WOMWOU-505 ,O CD st Cp r- O O N M r C CO (GNtn�tOM�I[! 0 r O.-OOOOr-O 0) C�-OCA0Ola ONT- o m�01,-Oeh000ON (' - r 0 00 0 M 0 0 (D N m 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 jCO In N N CO O M CO r Cprh OOtO�rlpO 0toN00N000st0> 000 �Or.-0000 W O O O O O O O O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 00000000 oW coMOO1`CACV) Ctf� CO N d' W CCLr 1A 0) 4-0 U 00 •L- y00Cf) 00001-CAMstco (/) h U r r 1c1 0 � MCONgt0Oet c0O p LL s M IM N O M O c Cl O O M M >✓ G r 04 O CO r Iolcq W Q _ cL lL W LL U. lL cL U- �= = '5'5 = = MMIMMMMM22 Cn C E O O N to 3 O 0 0 0 F- O 0 L E O Lu 3: -�- 0 CL 0 co O co crj Q.a.a 0> 0 v v 0 L o c c -j 0 -000 > 0 0 m m coo X 0. d wEErO - OW WU2mLO P!T #2 Incorporate Kent School District Updated 2003-04 to 2008-2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by the Kent School District Board of Directors June 25, 2003. A in t 00 up SCNOOL MISTRICT Na 41 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary Serving Vnincorporated ping County and Kent, Covington, Aubum, 9Yaple Vaffey, BlackDiamond; Renton, Sea2ac, Washington Apri[2003 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003-2004 - 2008-2009 April 2003 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. - Superintendent Daniel L. Moberly - Assistant Superintendent - Business Services Fred H. High - Executive Director of Finance Mark Haddock, Ph.D. - Assistant Superintendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney - Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Special Services Carla Jackson - Executive Director, Kent -Meridian Strand Joseph McBrayer, Ph.D. - Executive Director, Kentlake Strand Merri Rieger - Executive Director, Kentridge Strand Janis McBrayer - Executive Director, Kentwood Strand Gary Plano - Executive Director of Instructional Services Valerie Lynch, Ed.D. - Executive Director of Special Services Donald Hall - Executive Director of Information Technology Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 0 [out school IISIf!CI Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2003-2004 - 2008-2009 April 2003 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Forecast & Planning Administrator Don Walkup & Helen Shindell-Butler, Transportation Department Larry Price, Director of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 X,811 SC11961 District Six Tear Capital Facilities Plan 2a6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" g I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 11 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 1 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2003 for the 2002-2003 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent 5, School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 2002-2003 program capacity of permanent facilities is 24,552 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2002 was 26,378. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,353.74. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2002, full head count was 26,717. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan . April 2003 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) 8.06% of 21,646 King County live births in 1998 is forecast for 1,790 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2003. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.06% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (see Tabie 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified by others as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in' the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and a small portion of the city of Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area has been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and Kent Mountain View Academy is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR (Continued) "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Multi -Family Elementary Junior High Senior High Total Elementary Junior High Senior High Total .466 .227 .200 .281 .105 .068 .454. The student generation factor is based on a survey of 4,485 single family dwelling units and 2,701 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 4,485 single family dwelling units there were 2,088 elementary students, 1,017 junior high students, and 898 senior high students' for a total of 4,003 students. In 2,701 multi -family dwelling units, there were 759 elementary students, 284 junior high students, and 183 senior high students, for a total of 1,226 students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 5 O N 00 = LL N N Za W Y W In 0 O 1` CO In _ N N Cp O 0 T O O to N O t� o M N N CD OD co 00 M N CO O c O � N O O N O T 0 O I,- N O OD o N ~O N CA O M o T v N 0) I N CO to W O r O O) � O Cl) N M to (D to CO 1` O Cl) N tp 131O O O r M O v O CO r r N N N N N N N N r U) Irl- to ti O O O M N �• a to M O M W "T O r to � M � to M Cl) O) O O r r N r N O CC) r N N N N N N N N N r r IO W M to ID O co O .Mr- �O M O O O O O N O N O N 1` V O N N N N N N N N N N r r I N 0 O r N 1` 0 r to N O N h C• CO � r N M CO O O et CO M O 01 O r N O r O t` O r N N N N N N N N N r r � to O to tp to M O to M In 1 to (O O O O ct CO N N to tt 1 M O O N O r O O CA O) O co 1 N N N N N N N r r r to It O v M (O N O r 1` 1` n N O to to 0 N M w co co ti CA O � O r O O O O O O O (Y) t� to N N N N N N r r r r �- r _ N M W CO O v O) 1` M r LO In 1` N co co N O N to O Co c0 1` r O O CA O M CO M M O W 1-t Cn N r (y r r r r r r r r r 1` to T m N .t to to r V to Co O ti r to r N C)) N �• O) (C) O co co CA O m O m N 0) O) co 1` (O V r N r N r r r r r r r r In 1` ti to N 0 to CO N O O O) co CO M co � CT) co O IT) N w In O O O) m w to m M co CO to M IS') ti w N 0 1� to CA (o c0 r- O r m CD co O O a cI c a CY) n cc! to M N N r r r r r r r r r r N N M tin O r w - N ccoo CD O CYO) O O CA CJ) CJ) CA CO co 1� (O CO v N O to et 0 (O to M O co N O Cl to d st (O r CO M N N r co O to � CA Cn M O CO h h (O Co �' `7 N r r r T r r r r r T r r N M � M N m er to M co Cl N Clco to r- N m O N N 't Co (O O O co W � cc ti t` (O (O to V of M N r r r r r r r r r r r r N y to C, CO N o (D N O D) U @ Q) a N N m = M co LO > m C C`i to N r Ln N J � W it CD y N c E c � T N M T Lo co 1` co M OT N co O.2 N .r-- c0 c o CU CO Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 U m O 0 D -0 "0 -0 'v "a 'O 'O '0 co C °p CO W N U WUl) 2 N Y Y Y C7 C7 C9 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' U` C7 C9 C� n M er to C, CO N (D N O D) U @ Q) a N m = M co LO V O C`i to N r Ln N it CD y N c E m v Q co M v N co O.2 N .r-- c0 c N M W � c LL C O W c co C °p CO W N U WUl) 2 N 00 E c O L_ 3 Nto OD H _y 8O M � 0 u v t6 E v; c N o c o O aci W Lq CID .a c"J N M O N C p C L � Y c :E U N N � T � CY) co U tp > c l0 W MC N t p y m rn � m m m O a) l Cl c V C ai N N Lo v a) vy Y n a) .0 c 0 0) Ln V a l6 C) U C C, f' � m 0 N O (vj Y = U N 0 O T y = M N 4) [L LL cOO i N co In` E o N M 2 W .f`-. n N � W cli N p0 O m L .0 a o 11 N CDN 3 M 'a m (a>^ W 2 c c O — m r F- m .� 7 7 LL Cl p w O -Lp — ad y m N r N O v O) U r- .3 C T V c Y ca (O N LL In p C W tl ce) (o (O c W y .4) a) CD rn rn ami n o v U N .0 > m N } L _7 U O = x y C y CL N Q' cn N N U n N 0LL V C 0 _ c � c N ECD N OO y E U) c m E N t Q m o E c m v c W U C > C > M O Vi ca a) c N U C ►o- ? I-- a Y U .- N m KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E.- ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births' 21,646 22,212 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,870 21,950 ' Increase / Decrease 73 566 -205 480 -709 92 80 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 2 Early Childhood Education @ .5 68 70 78 87 97 108 120 213 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 873 895 913 932 923 931 939 Grade 1 1,922 1,824 1,893 1,931 1,989 1,975 1,996 Grade 2 1,936 1,917 1,839 1,908 1,964 2,027 2,017 Grade 3 2,055 1,947 1,949 1,871 1,959 2,020 2,087 Grade 4 2,068 2,064 1,983 1,985 1,925 2,019 2,084 Grade 5 2,149 2,042 2,092 2,011 2,032 1,977 2,075 Grade 6 2,151 2,191 2,097 2,147 2,084 2,110 2,059 Grade 7 2,380 2,272 2,315 2,232 2,290 2,229 2,261 Grade 8 2,079 2,317 2,246 2,304 2,227 2,290 2,234 Grade 95 2,404 2,320 234 569 915 1,278 1,504 Grade 95 2,607 2,544 2,614 2,533 2,608 Grade 10 2,039 2,163 2,122 2,401 2,349 2,417 2,348 Grade 11 1,823 1,820 1,959 1,940 2,197 2,155 2,220 Grade 12 1,475 1,496 1,542 1,677 1,666 1,888 1,857 Total FTE Enrollment 25,422 25,338 25,635 25,970 26,316 26,679 26,905 Note: 213 Yearly Increase 21 -84 297 335 346 363 226 Yearly Increase % 0.08% -0.33% 1.17% 1.31% 1.33% 1.38% 0.85% Cumulative Increase 21 -63 234 569 915 1,278 1,504 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 25,422 25,338 25,635 25,970 26,316 26,679 26,905 runaergarten projection based on King County actual five birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County livebirths 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Includes ECE @ .5 - Early Childhood Ed) 3 Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although many schools have Full Day Kindergarten at 1.0 FTE with alternative funding. a Oct. 2002 P223 Headcount is 26,378. Full student headcount including 136 Preschool & 377 Running Start = 26,717. 5 Grade level reconfiguration. In 2004, 9th grade moves to the senior high schools. G R OWTH PROJECTIONS - Adjustments for current economic factors * For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district: Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2003 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of. Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, 8 & c) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current_ Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 20 students. Class size for grade 4 at impact schools should not exceed an average of 20 students. Class size for grade 4 at non -impact schools should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 23 students per classroom because there are five grade levels at K - 4 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth grade split classes, etc.). Many elementary schools now provide full day kindergarten programs with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. . (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page a III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education District Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. - Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Programs Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career and Technical Education Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades K - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools has been adjusted from 95% utilization in the past to reflect 100% utilization at the elementary level. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 10 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,552 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 2,051. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs and the addition of new schools. It also reflects the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size from 22:1 to 20:1 in grades K - 3 and Grade 4 reductions of 20:1 at impact schools or 23:1 for non -impact schools. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding from Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in class size for Academic Achievement Initiative 728. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K - 12. This school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementar Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2003 Page 12 2002-2003 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 470 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 401 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 482 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 437 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 426 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 406 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 460 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Gienridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 450 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191 st Place SE, Kent 98042 460 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 444 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 -186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 434 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 426 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 539 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 440 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 411 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 539 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 428 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 403 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 374 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street. Kent 98031 460 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 483 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 462 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 483 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 406 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 444 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 -1 00th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 416 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 506 Elementary TOTAL 12,521 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 949 Kent Junior High 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 816 Mattson Junior High 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 808 Meeker Junior High 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Meridian Junior High 1958 MJ 23480 -120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 74T Northwood Junior High 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 944 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 830 Junior High TOTAL 5,984 Kent -Meridian Senior High 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,417 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,622 Kentridge Senior High 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 1,301 Kentwood Senior High 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 1,291 Senior High TOTAL 5,631 Kent Mountain View Academy Z 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 24,552 ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in class size for Academic Achievement Initiative 728. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K - 12. This school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementar Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2003 Page 12 3S anV 4101,t Z �> • C Op Oa >° mm• 3= Y X)m �o ° cw `:) Z 7 �r >0 YE N • o m° N nC CE = 0 m° ya •W ofC MT mo o mo 3SanV m C �o mC �y mr c= gE �O 0 a Y Om • m32Z y= ap O tnw E om• i U'w TE w 3S anV 41801 N U C N P w _ N N Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan N 'a C s N N C. ^ am \ W n � C Z oV cm0 V -� 12arn.��DOaE mcaM >a CO Y Y M a •> m m�oo��j�v mr Cal �0 O �0%&. 2: 2- UUP ->,o U cmn v U U Cn c_ V 0 Ow i 3S anV 4101,t Z �> • C Op Oa >° mm• 3= Y X)m �o ° cw `:) Z 7 �r >0 YE N • o m° N nC CE = 0 m° ya •W ofC MT mo o mo 3SanV m C �o mC �y mr c= gE �O 0 a Y Om • m32Z y= ap O tnw E om• i U'w TE w 3S anV 41801 N U C N P w _ N N Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan N 'a C s N N C. ^ am \ W n Spon jseM C• m> m`p Uc Z 3 m0 m zW 0 C m coo Y�Q D LI <7 30 `mC 0= H !AW YS Y 0 QO Y a .O to V 3 O O O O O O > v v v . _C V)tANM L = -C 4-1 Cn .M C C = _ O E.o O 4., c 'C c a w -7i to Y N April 2003 Page 13 m> 0:,C o mr V• a� -a° m oEm >E• 0 Ow C • 0 .2°m C UW • y $E Um ym0 Cr • C -C mUm QO aC _ a �o 00 E >m O0 Oy p O.0 W Uw OC CN • • �2 h 3S enV 41091 :C C ° m CY 110 o vy oa J C > h mE •o 2m Ct •W Om N V H 2w ouL£ L C E r ° V� uZ 3S en £l �� • C o cm m° me CCC( o mE m mcm •' fvOiw •C0 �W �•�. C0 EU • co nu C C L O Q Oa DE o= 02 �• N 0 •m0 2i L W °m N J co=op• - 3SenV4170 m zr _C i; Y =U r • N m WE m �, i o =C ro _m W __ a 20 E N w <) WW CC Y� • enV JCijUGO Spon jseM C• m> m`p Uc Z 3 m0 m zW 0 C m coo Y�Q D LI <7 30 `mC 0= H !AW YS Y 0 QO Y a .O to V 3 O O O O O O > v v v . _C V)tANM L = -C 4-1 Cn .M C C = _ O E.o O 4., c 'C c a w -7i to Y N April 2003 Page 13 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2003, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • Construction funding for additions to three high schools received voter approval. The Board authorized grade level reconfiguration to move 9th grade students to high schools and serve 7th and 8th grade students at middle schools. New classroom additions will add capacity for 2,213 students when 9`h Grade moves to the high schools. Construction is expected to be complete by Fall of 2004. • Reconfiguration will provide additional capacity at middle schools. Implementation is expected for 2004. • The Board approved a temporary closure to remodel Kent Junior High. In 2004-05, students from KJH will attend other middle schools when 9th grade students have moved to the high schools. Kent Junior will re -open as a middle school with additional programs in 2005. • A site was purchased at 15435 SE 256th Street in Covington, and remains a part of the site bank for future schools. Other potential future sites and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • The Board authorized purchase of a site for Junior High #8 east of 124th Avenue SE at SE 286th Street. That site was determined not to be feasible and the property is for sale. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. The sites have not been determined. County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see rabie 4) The voter approved bond issue for $105.4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2002 voter approval of $69.5 million bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for additions to three high schools which are scheduled to be completed in 2004. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Ype Status Projected Projected % for Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth I Awmwmate I AmowmaU ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)To be determined 2 New Planning 2008 500 75% JUNIOR HIGH Grade Level Reconfiguration will Move 9th grade to High School Program Planning 2004 provide additional capacity at Junior High schools SENIOR HIGH Classroom additions at Kent -Meridian Additions Planning 2004 316 100% 3 high schools and move Kentridge Additions Planning 2004 1,001 100% 9th Grade to high school Kentwood Additions Planning 2004 896 100% Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2003+ 23 - 31 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent -Meridian High School New Planning TBD 2 N / A IMap I 9 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED I 4 Covington area (Near Mattson JH) 7 Covington area (Scarsella) 5 Covington area West (Halleson) 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West) 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.) 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 Land Use Type Jurisdiction Elementary City of Covington Elementary King County TBD Z City of Covington Elementary King County Junior High King County Elementary King County TBD 2 King County 12 Former Jr Hi #8 site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave. SE, Kent Site was determined to be "unbuildable" for a junior high and property is now for sale. Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16. Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2003 Page 15 • 9 aiolS'a'U' Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 16 Z -�— '' ++ m mT V v ■ i o0 J(n y� T �• ■y 0 L m 30 nom' W Y N •0 C mE 0 �� N 3m o_ cri a a r O oW �nw O r0 m _ m� YS o N i0L C Ya Q C © N C O ■�� >t0Or o U• m o m O0 c J< o U . 7 D > 0 0 C \/ O2� L0 mW U • 0 y Um ymo m r lyH L • • Mucc1 o`z 0 CT D0 L E 0 in O DT • 0° O@ C > O �� ` �� 2O2 Cm m� W 0 •w mm• 3? • •�= Va a m t 0 Y o H 3S eAV ylv9 L `pF ocd CW Oj Z :r= N C Q 0 o iso oC gym• >m Co LL0 Y0 o _� U 0 J w pw • 0 mC L 0 Z. •0 3S eAV ylOvt m• y E N 2.E2 •w 00 N E Uo mCo m •+' w z iw 0CID= o m �� o m r 3S mC 9AV PUZEI C L o=� o o 3S 0AV PUZEI �R z OW •7 �o DV U0• V •C C O CC 00 C ' CL• Y Om 2C O`m m� 0 �0 N •mE -a DC y= D�inW •' cctE CNW •Cm iW D� C0 •co aw Do DZ EU `m UW Q oo 0E • mE• u`c OE• L a w WW Ym Q N • Q- mm �� 3SeAV L490 •YZ a0W N cE Ow me y' 0 0 00 we 3S eAV yivol m = Z C o C0 �C• W0 -EE C0 ?0• C OD=L• Y� O in CE 6 -TL ow 000 Wm 0 i •z _° N A. w 2 U4) y o mE NW 0:3E ; • UID! 704 -AV pilUeo a w Z � 6omy8Li.{ AalloA 1saM • m• N 09 m� YC L UC 0 NTm m m N N N N > W 5 m Zw CE `coo 00 Kit 22< • 9 aiolS'a'U' Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 16 V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 158 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (see Appendices A 8 C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 17 V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2002 was 25,353.74 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College - only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & SA -B -C on pages 19 - 22) Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2002 was 26,378 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2002 totals 26,717 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 19 - 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 .Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2"3-2 2004-2005 2005 2006 2006 �01)10)7j,2007-2008 2008 20pg Actual R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity'] 24,552 24,552 24,552 26,765 26,765 26,765 26,765 New Permanent Construction 7 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade moves to high schools in 2004 Additions to Senior High schools 2,213 Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 5 500 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 2& AL FTE ENROLLMENT/ DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 750 1 25 25,338 27,168 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,552 24,552 26,765 26,765 26,765 26,765 27,265 25,635 Interim Relocatable Ca aci 26,316 26.679 26 qn. Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required 299 899 23 928 0 0 0 0 46 0 230 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 403 744 992 1,178 1,209 Total Relocatable Capacity Required11 4 1,198 951 403 744 1,038 1,408 1,209 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 2& AL FTE ENROLLMENT/ DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 750 1 25 25,338 27,168 1 27,509 1 27,8031, 28,173 1 28,474 25,635 25,970 26,316 26.679 26 qn. 328 165 1,533 1,539 1,487 1,494 1 ' Capacity p ty is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped & 1/2 day Kindergarten student = .5). 3 In 2004, 9th grade will move to the high schools and result in increased capacity at Middle School level. 4 2002-2003 total classroom relocatable capacity is 2,051. 5 Unfunded facility needs are pending review. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table jle 5 April 2003 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-200=2008-2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D [Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,631 5,631 5,631 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 New Permanent Senior High Construction 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade moves to high schools in 2004 Classrooms added at three high schools 2,213 Subtotal 5,631 5,631 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 Relocatable Capacity Required 144 0 0 403 744 992 1,178 1,209 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 5,631 5,631 8,247 8,588 8,836 9,022 9,053 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 & WSJ 8,993 9 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 294 152 17 26 10 29 20 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 13 24 32 38 39 Capacity p ty is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students. Approximately 220 Junior High students are served all or part of the day at high schools. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2003 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 1 20042005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007-2008 2008.2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,168 5,984 5,984 5,984 New Capacity from =Recon 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade moves to high schools in 2004 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel in 2004-05 - Middle School re -opens in 2005 -816 816 Subtotal 5,984 5,984 5,168 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 Relocatable Capacity Required' 899 928 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' a3 6,883 6,912 5,168 5,984 5,984 5.9114 s caste FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 20 909 4,561 4,536 4,517 4,519 3 607 1,448 1,467 1,465 1 Number of Relocatables Required 31 32 0 0 p i 0 0 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection Approximately 220 9th grade students are currently served at high schools. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004. 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel in 2004-05 - Kent Middle School re -opens in Fall 2005 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2003 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 1 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 1 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 Actual I P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 12,521 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 Kent Mountain View Academy' 416 [New Permanent Elementary Construction Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 4 500 Subtotal 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 13,437 [Relocatable Capacity Required 2 299 23 0 0 46 230 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,236 12,960 12,937 12,937 12,983 13,167 13,437 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 3 I 13,222 12,950 12,844 12,872 12,973 13,167 1 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 14 10 93 65 10 0 60 Number of Relocatables Required 13 1 0 0 2 - 10 0 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades K - 12. The school (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed and utilized as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten @.5) 4 Facility needs are pending review. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2003 Page 22 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2003 - 2004 through 2008 - 2009. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. The District anticipates receiving state matching funds for the senior high school additions. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school that has received funding approval from voters. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This will fund building additions at three high schools which will coincide with moving 9th grade to the senior high in 2004. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 23 w U Q Z LL a N 6 O> tV d .a Q N E ti !_- ::: - N O to t0 0 0 Go 0 0 0 O ou to :? C 4V. : us- O O O p LQ GO N co v } 3:. O O O Go 603, O O It Q�j f19 p O) i{ O :;:?: Ct o Go O p q ao m E ►, :: to - U i rr:i o N � E O N C) a> c Cl) O w c m v E v ::::::. O N D D aNi o co y N :: M: C) :{ N:: O C O Go N Vi C'? _ m v yg O p C y m LL E w7 U _o U h 8E N 7 V) U ani � c ) w LO U m m N U c m 3 N c � C " O L j Q N a m v 0 d m 4) w O c O O E w W J LL °' W a LL L _rn to c v Q N � E 47 w W _ U Q g� O CL m W LL _ CO t; y w c 5 LL II LL �0 0 U w 0 m m v N N N n 'S m H t U N in E H L O N c E m c N ami Q N N a a N 6 O> tV d .a Q VIII Finance Plan -.Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with 5% inflation factor, and the projected construction cost of the additions to three high schools. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary (#30 -open 2000) $12,182,768 Current cost of Elementary #31 $14,103,076 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2008 $18,000,000 Senior High Schools Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $4,800,000 Addition to Kentrid a $10,400,000 Addition to Kentwood $9,600,000 Projected construction cost of additions to 3 High Schools $24,800,000 The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 25 c to 0 - LL LL a m U `m m U) c 0 L m m Y O N m O m a m O 0 N OL Q m U Q m m m - O > N j m N U') lf) N Q � Q m Q � .mm.. h CD MS .m+ N �, Q (D to E N 00 in io to 0 W 47 m N W O 'V --t r0 v r O 0 N 0 ( V 0W0 O r r �r 00 N a w O r N O N (D r N (O 0 0 O ti V• co0 00 rn OD M O O OD (o N O (D o N d O M N N M N O (p N r O to 'cr M O rE9 ER E9 E!i 69 69 d9 N 0 69 0 r 69 _ LO 6o 69 Q 64 y3 M 000 O O � �CD N~- (ND w .4tOND M w N O 00 O M h O (o (n 1- co (D co O r � O 00 p r- L Lo (D 00 c0 O) O V) — O CD (O (D 07 0 r M r O O h h r 0 N r to M r O N W O N U LO rt M (o N M � r co O LO O6% 0 6. M q r r) L 0 N 0 69 Efl d9 Efl 64 6 i M 0 M 69 n 69 d9 69 6% rE9 _� ER C E9 Cj c0 603, �N ER m m� co LO (OD t� O- p � � CO O � O O ' O 000. r O N r ct (o 0 M 0 � ~ � coO `" M M O r O t`mi r Q r r r r r r r r (7 M N O O M O M 0) 0 M nj c0 t y r to N '� 10 6 5 v N N o 0 0 Z N +_.+ � C o CO M U a O Cn 00 O O N UJ �--' U co v 01 O E CO O) N U N OC V C O = r C O co O O O1 W _m w p co Of � 7 to C o c O1 rn CO rn CO mC c Y c m co m p o 0 > U c c Y U m Y N y m m m m m co w 0 m Y L 0 W W - Y Y Y Y0) - c UJ N2 (A _- U) .� co > 07 O O O N O O v F •:. a!-,:' N Q N N N r N o CD to O •� 0¢ N w N N � �- coo cn (n — (n (n 0 (n U) N c � W W W Z :i O W Co N O O O N M CN N 04 to .1 N Cl) r N U ;' Lu t0 W N O `� w O o v co ui 7 d r m .^� v (n W a (D ~ m (n CL q CO O O O CD O O O) 01 mO O fl- NZ J-- C9 O 0) O O DI Of OO �W O� 0) co O Y oa. } o a 0 (0 L n - m E o 4) o Q m C7 ai w O t rn m t m N m V E d O m Y m m = m !n D c n >. O E H C y 0 _M L C mcc 'h N m p V N U y Ol O = C O m x O v (� v to m m m E E m- �' a c Z c iv m c a $ = ' E m m Y c v m m m L c Z`16 c w �, a O o _m c O N y M o y 'N N _O m c U N O O (n m U m N E c (n (0 j U # d O) _ O p Y c O c Cl N O O N Cu -U) 0 E c o Y U c i O m g v m t v Q CL v N' c> N _O Y O O O C _ ? ►' W O J > O W C 'O O U Y m a a E wL•. C .0 2 -� O � .0.. O C m N W CA (4 U O a U w= -C )NO o cc N E _ .O. .O. .O. C d w C H uni Y Y C7 Y W c) cn co U) in Z Y cn cn N m d m o v n Z c c t €: C c C m m m m m a -e m 2 a com a m C a m m a E ? o� > = g a rn c > > > cp > m Z r UIM N n _ W07 z c to 0 - LL LL a m U `m m U) c 0 L m m Y O N m O m a m O 0 N OL Q KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Elementary 0.466 Junior High 0.227 Senior High 0.200 Total 0.893 Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0.281 Junior High 0.105 Senior High 0.068 Total 0.454 Projected Student Capacity SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary 500 Elementary 80 Junior High 1,065 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 2,213 Senior High 120 Required Site Acreage per Facility Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary (required) 11 Elementary $81,558 Junior High (required) 21 Junior High $p Senior High (required) 27 Senior High $82,761 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $18,000,000 Junior High $0 Senior High $24,800,000 See calculations on Pg. 25 Temporary Facility Square Footage 1,455,606 Elementary 86,956 Junior High 26,280 Senior High 21,736 Total 4% 134,972 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,455,606 Junior High 753,079 Senior High 800,882 Total 96% 3,009,567 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,542,562 Junior High 779,359 Senior High 822,618 Total 3,144, 539 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value Dwelling Units 0 n Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 23 $91,181 Junior High @ 29 $91,181 Senior High @ 31 $91,181 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 54.29% for Senior High Additions Area Cost Allowance - Cost/Sq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $125.32 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $222,591 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $65,437 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $2.10 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate . 4_SgO/ April2003 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Cap A 1 (Elementary) 11 $81,558 500 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $82,761 2,213 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (PermanentlTotal Square I Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor B 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0.466 B 2 (Junior High) $0 1,065 0.227 B 3 (Senior High) $24,800,000 2,213 0.200 0.893 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Squal Facility Cost Facility CapacityStudent Factor C 1 (Elementary) $91,181 23 0.466 C 2 (Junior High) $91,181 29 0.227 C 3 (Senior High) $91,181 31 0.200 0.893 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet pei Area Cost Allowance I SPI D 1 (Elementary) $125.32 D 2 (Junior High) $125.32 D 3 (Senior High) $125.32 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 Current Bond Interest Rate Years Amortized (10 Years) Student Factor 0.466 $836.13 0.227 $0 0.200 $201.95 0.893 A —> $1,038.08 Cage Ratio 0.96 $16,104.96 0.96 $0 0.96 $2,151.65 B —> $18,256.61 lage Ratio 0.04 $73.90 0.04 $28.55 0.44 $23.53 C —> $125.98 student x District Match % x Student Factor 3q-Ft./Student I DistrictMatch % I Student Factor I 80 0.5429 0.466 $2,536.39 113.33 0 0.227 $0 120 0.5429 0.200 $1,632.87 D —> $4,169.26 Developer Provided Facility Credit Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal $222,591 $2.10 4.69% 10 TC —> Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 $1,038.08 $18,256.61 $125.98 $19,420.67 $4,169.26 $3,662.48 $7,831.74 Total Unfunded Need $11,588.93 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $3,662.48 FC —> 0 $5,794.46 0 ($1,502.46) $4,292.00 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor ( Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Cap A 1 (Elementary) 11 $81,558 500 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $82,761 2,213 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x IPermanen I Construction Cost I Facility Cap B 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 B 2 (Junior High) $0 1,065 B 3 (Senior High) $24,800,000 2,213 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x Facility Cost C 1 (Elementary) $91,181 C 2 (Junior High) $91,181 C 3 (Senior High) $91,181 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet Pei Area Cost Allowance I SP1 D 1 (Elementary) $125.32 D 2 (Junior High) $125.32 D 3 (Senior High) $125.32 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit 23 29 31 / Total Squat Student Factor 0.281 0.105 0.068 0.454 / Total Squat Student Factor 0.281 0.105 0.068 0.454 Student Factor I 0.281 $504.19 0.105 $0 0.068 $68.66 0.454 $1,529.45 A —> $572.85 Cage Ratio 0.96 $9,711.36 0.96 $0 0.96 $731.56 B —> $10,442.92 tags Ratio 0.04 $44.56 0.04 $13.21 0.04 $8.00 C —> $65.77 student x District Match % x Student Factor iq. Ft. / Student I District Match % Student Factor 80 0.5429 0.281 $1,529.45 113.33 0 0.105 $0 120 0.5419 0.068 $554.15 D—> $208361 Average MF Residential Assessed Value $65,437 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $2.10 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.69% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC —> Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC —> Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit Subtotal D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal $572.85 $10,442.92 $65.77 $11,081.54 $2,083.61 $1,076.69 $3,160.30 Total Unfunded Need $7,921.24 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit $3,960.62 0 ($1,317.62) $2,643.00 $1,076.69 0 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2002 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2002 Plan are summarized here. Property for Junior High #8 was determined not feasible and is still for sale. Voters approved funding for additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth, moving 9h grade to senior highs, which will provide additional capacity for grade 7-8 at junior high schools in 2004. Kent Junior High will close for remodeling in 2004-05 and re -open as a middle school in 2005-06. Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 4 as well as program changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Permanent facility costs are based on schools built most recently with adjustment for 5% inflation rate. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase from impact fee formulas and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. See page 25 for further explanation. The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to reflect changes. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.504 0.466 Single Family (SF) Jr 0.211 0.227 Updated in 2002 Plan Sr 0.183 0.200 Total 0.898 0.893 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.273 0.281 Multi -Family (MF) Jr 0.114 0.105 Updated in 2002 Plan Sr 0.076 0.068 Total 0.463 0.454 State Match Credit 54.19% 54.29% 1" change since 1999 Plan Area Cost Allowance (Beockh Index) $110.32 $125.32 Per SPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $205,665 $222,591 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $65,868 $65,437 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $2.10 $2.10 Per King County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 5.19% 4.69% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,147 $4,292 Change to fee Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $2,554 $2,643 Change to fee Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 30 .X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 31 1— Z W J J 0 w 2 W Z 0 qU Q W 'C C !C W LL W J L Q � Q v Z 0 U LU f. O y } Ix 0 J H 0 Z =W U Z Z W Q M C.) 0 Ix IL c00 O T O NV V ro O 7 b O, t0 0 N m N O N M N ro O O eA LO v v v 1n V v V 1n v v m V 10 u� u. 10 1n V 1n e v U, CO O M O O O O O O O V O O O O O O O [0 O O O O O O w V O O O M 10 O 10 10 t0 0 O n O O 47 O 10 10 O M O 10 Ow M n 0 n ONi M Q N Il'1 Vr,IU O m N M O N V m O W Oi M O 100 N V V V M V 10 V V < V V V V V V (0 V 10 V 03a, 10 V V V V V M t0 0 O O O a O t00 0 0 0 O O O a N N d N O O O N O M M O N N O O O N O V M O N O O N N O O O N — — N .-- N O O .- O .- r O N O V M N M O O N P t0 c0 p _ MO O N O N O p Op MNO OO O O NO O O mV- M M V h N M 10 N M N N M V V M N M M M V N V V N N M N r M Cn'1 M V 00i O (`n') NM cMp M dc", m 4Ny aO l0 00 N V 0 M N O N O) t0 V V V V V M 10 V V V V V V 10 V V N a 100 v < 100 R 0 a 0 1Nn M N C4 N NO NN Nm O VNN NNNW N N NNNNN N N N N r U> O3: W 2 LL 3. w] W U ° O1 (n d °1 J0 0 wT a U U U U W W LL (.7 0_' Y J W Z a O- a � !f) y (/1 N y J E E v _m o a m m m m 0 3'0 _m W m y O m j O _ a a m0 N U E 7 O W E GO J L m O 0— Y p > 7 U m m rn m= m o y o c W Y c o m c 0 m 0; U U a m c E.0 > my C in m C m N Y m a v C >` � 1-- m �D Cl) -� _m m Q C C y C m 4/ m C � m D) SC C y C (J U V U D W W LL U C7 = m m m m m `m — m m m SM m is a o.c .Yi J .fir M Z .ar a" d ir in (0 (n fn U:), Y E 0 o y 0 7 m U y u m m E $ � m N Cm a` W 2 aai U O W C C � o m U C C a m m + @ m v of 'y m w C Y m y � a wp J 7 0 (Cl c S? f� m 7 C N E E po7 y O U 7 U a n _ � m m m + _ 7 v 1m LL f0 C C W � f0 N o ` m N 11 C 10 U O/ n `9n v o Ec cq N Y C y O Z v � y 7 MNU C ata o W coO F _y O_ lL 8 7 m fi 7 E n t0 mO m Cl. ao Ey W N jp N m O E p co � N m 00 m N m — > 2 M m m C m o mm n am U to U, L m O _, O m O. V L E O E (n c Q o v 1 o m �, 8 ♦- v O y C m L m m o cn (D W m m m W Y W 0 N a Q X c Z W a Q co 0 W CN OC N o 4) ^m co M N C oo E O .U) N C mo ao c v Go coD) o O t` � o v O O m W •- �- r r co 1n m j y D U w In U C O W 1— O y O^ E N W n N tD CO ty v N O cD v, O O co coco V' tt O to N N C m N j O L LL~. C N O ^ c0 :: O � 00 p CO T W E O _� U- C) O G N m W to N O M ZD Q D T W .. CO Q ui cR O O N V OOi O O O O O _T U a) U ' m cc U t4 N N r coo C m M K m U is E a W f- o m _m U r: :. M O O v O E m O` m. LL y to O ':.. N N V U W N m m: vI C yn W E J m m D: O O O .- N N O N n E a' M y Ki Q o m a. U OC OtO x to Z th E o O i m E -� H W U oN O n v o c rn t- v o O a0 co A MO) so o m a N m N d V OD m co O CD co a) 0- N a L m p to ao o M ZNOmm w " U m ,:Q U Go tD = m :Z ccn co CL :': rn a U :: =j Q U Z n y r N U) a` v:: to o m m to to to o C-3 N n a E cli U Z >- co r. W H w r o o Y Q m W co!C "r Cn co O M M w o Yv_ Q L = t) to U `m - d y v d it # CO '7 tO v to N m U '2 LC N N Q N � ;:; to Q A n cc .:. c 'OV m OGD � p ' O) P- - O ccD O) co Y M c CL d N y m to W to to U y v W y :: to CD to v r co M N N N N M N Of 16-.. E # cr) _. :� co Q :.i'i}i:'};} U Y h a °' co W Z U a Y Y Y Y fq p J O xL > LM !- g) L'6 CM J 2m _ m = 7 C O m O _O) w N .: t_rn o 4 V O to CN 0 C? N M wi to N to @ .- .-- to = W N G N to CND O M W2 N O ; co ' to C) — M 1 to n_ co 0 O N M O .U) N C M tt7 O) _N v N A co t0 M N `7 tq t` 4) 7 co n Q Q •- �- r r co 1n m j y tD U N In U C O L O O co coco V' tt O to N j O L v r 4 V O to CN 0 C? N M wi to N to @ .- .-- to = W N G N to CND O M W2 N O ; co ' to C) — M 1 to n_ _U U m m y C o � m N J y m 7 m to oE vi y °) o � y C U � •E y U L LO cm y T ° � o CL W _0 o � d m rn o � y U v c m w o N N M ip N N C L 7 w U C: as .-c° ° u mV U M m V L C N U m > y N C n m y w C U N � O y m y tD U O n c c to N D 7 w M m m coO im' y m = O O co V _ O 7 N F QCo _ y co y e o NM c y O O cc d N m 17,m :3 _ m as t`o J C F d Q O d m N M U U p LL F- E oo pa 2 _U 1_° a Z c U fA a v 4vami d U O` x !n W W U _H 6 O O L U N C m Y C2,44 M M t co N In U G N m CD to N O M ZD v v CO f- � W s m a d a N C yn YD m O o m E OC OtO LO to W O = O L O U O) to Go tD N co U r N N C In cli O co toI v U . t? C) o Yv_ • `m v d m U m E a Y Y Y Y p Q CM J lA m Q _O) t_rn o >. O c E m m L 'D N 3 m m 3 c rn C m CD ac) ac) (D Y Z Y Y Y Y _U U m m y C o � m N J y m 7 m to oE vi y °) o � y C U � •E y U L LO cm y T ° � o CL W _0 o � d m rn o � y U v c m w o N N M ip N N C L 7 w U C: as .-c° ° u mV U M m V L C N U m > y N C n m y w C U N � O y m y tD U O n c c to N D 7 w M m m coO im' y m = O O co V _ O 7 N F QCo _ y co y e o NM c y O O cc d N m 17,m :3 _ m as t`o J C F d Q O d m N M U U p LL F- E oo pa 2 _U 1_° a Z c U fA a v 4vami d U O` x !n W W U _H 6 O O L U N C m Y _a. O O N N L,7 COU rn O a m. � M O O N � . CD r O O fA Cl) � O O O O O Z O O d O y N aro aO 7 C N O O V O ON O N NCO O CD r O M f N O O N Q O Z : _O m N T 0 o :' N a0 O C to .- r y' o m: C) a: N ..° .. fD N O O Z O .: r N O M r Cl) O N O O N It C m '. mLO CL O co w C V% N `o m; m Z W p co O O N 0 J LO oo Z '. o - 00 (O O O co 00 Nir v � � w A mm O M cn v :3 fnX ClO C) o o m o W N `o m Z O o o o w o z° coo r o o r IL o Q U 0 N W m 'O ca m Cl) co ui cn a. N N O fn ui cn co U p O 0 (0 o W a` Y N O mrn U a Nm � ' C U- N > O O m •U :' O E O O N :' N 0) 3 rn v _ O M mU N O N C14O O _ O Z O :. M O O O O N N N N _ =� U tD O LL L m r. N LL O Cl) •a N Cl) co O C, 760 0 v CD O y V ~ m `� OU ' > > a U) c a n O N O x E vi cc co m --io c0 fl U U U ix N O 75"0 CL cU O O O O t0 U 0 N _O Q O U) U) t N } N a fa m ca m f0 COf U Q) m O 3:= O _0 ` N •� O d J tO •j c = _ Cl) N C - CC_ C m cr E o o ca cA W m Y N � w E (DO N U • � FO— d. ` M O) O N M N OO p Nm C. ^ r 0 r CN NN� N NN ON ry N NO NNCN O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O C U f9 co to t0 •f 1D O 00 N a) N N O N oOp O M C) t00 ICO t0 N M O co co M O O tb 0) 10 r (D co M ti Li O to N N ' tD N 0 C N N N to O M (h N r N N N N N N (+) N N N N N .M- r N r N .M-- r � M 1D N Go 0 N O O O O O O O o O O O O o O O O O O O O O O o o o o O o o o O O O O O O O O O O O N N o N c N v M fD M V t0 N O M N CO tO to co co O O C4 UJ co O 0) 'tt c�9 M coN M f, U) M t0 01 r O N O N V N p V tp N w N O '7 Q M M CO< M V O R t0 R 7 P�7 tOO O) ? M M Or N^ LO M co M w N O N LO co c O o o O O O O O o O 0 0 0 -a o. w tM') r m M_ a O a, Ol O t0 O O) O t0 co O O) 't _o M rV to n t co M to v f-- 10 M N O M cn 0 0 0 0 (NO O CO Ln (D 10 tL N 0 0 CO O W a0 r r O r N O O V O O c0 0 r r 0) ^ t0 c0 O eA c00 cq N n co 1M O) cp 7 N t0 n r t0 w LO N M 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O r 0 0 0 r O O o o o o N M tO N cq Go O O O r O 0 r o CS � r tp 117 r N r M c+D O ON N� O (O N r 'O ^ N 10 N V N N 0 v M N t0 I t0 N 10 c0 N N O) O N t0 M N M r CO _ _ co N N N r t0 N a N P7 N t0 ^ M N N coN N 0'I V) O O ZU E (0 v r O) Z N c v OD M r O N M O O M T v t0 N o 7 w r N v r w M M M r N Cq LO O M r O M 10 N! r 0 r °1 otni . N .- N m N co O (� N QE U LL f6 .� r U- O M O c0 0 tO — to O N W M O W M O^ (0 O M N t0 V N K oD '., t0 O t0 tO M< K O N tD M? r N _ N N r tX7 N t0 !T N N r, N N 'R r c+Of N O O r N 76 76 . ~M N O C O) < N O) (rO (,�') N r N a00 M O) m cO O N tp C N _ Il> 4 cq O M N N N Q) N r t0 r0 N N .- Or N w v N M N O r r N w m co co U c � acc ~� E 2 CL W W U x O U� m O� w cn } J�� w Z E Q N W V7 J !n W U U U U !n x J U' J O W W x x U> U W W U i Z to a 2 0 2 v) m_ 2 W w tq Ucc 2U Y T � O C o °) °' Q CL .0 o r > �' O LL o Y m w m @ > m o o 7 v m �' V V to (D O 3 c c o c x aNi 3 y U m 3 o• m m T o Y m m m y _m -- L v E m m 3 u) C O O tq C W U N V) C 7 p, fO C m m m c U n' 'm > m _m T W N L > U Y — o c o a m E �c ® —>0 O o Y N LL y m °a m c rn m m 2 of m o m O g o U a — '( m a cm N � E J 3 oUe °c) = LL O O. w v U (° 4) m` @ m t0 Y m m Z®-0 m -y °� _ N N N 3 O j m m m fn jp m o U v m g m o m H > v ro (° o m �tl b 3 3 oa in m m U 3 0 U Um N U m m a uj c C m m Y= 0 ad -0 m m h -� m a m oc (mi c m 2 2 c r w o c� m c rn! o a 2 m m c a m a m cro z C7 m m c .E m at° C. N" E m 3 t t r N m m m z d d omi m c) o w O m 3 a _E m m-; m g� c m m m m t t o 0 o m t� o o °' a y o m (Yc m> o o t m m o m .3 g cc E~ aai c (n U U U U U U U W W LL LL LL x x= S S y J J J Z Z d d U U N r- -0 3 c t0 tO n co C .rM- ' co IO M 7 co O C N V O w C9 a C7 c°Ov r° °) aoD a m is ist i o°'i m a1°o V* co °r) v rn 00 W X 0 Z LU IL CL Q m a d cc t co n m U m iq U N_ 0 00 U C m Y O N CL < O N NM O _O to m phi _ O> O N M v N_ 10 CO (n O O O O O O O O O M O O O a 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O cu U U- Ori q co co c r 0) N to N_ v0 O O M 41 O O O O O 9 _ O M CO q O N N O O Cl) � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c N CD C E v F4 P tD P co 0) w P M N O c0 cli C7 M M co O cMn N N N N N OJ � N M 40 N C W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U y �p vm m M N v M O to (DIM O to o v P to m to n P v c0 P c0 to r W M cD m M6 to N 1C1 O lti M N N M t0 M v v sf O r M M M O) cD "t O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O _ IN O) t0 t0 •f r N .r-- N O� N M M O i N ^.-Of^v M MC N N N r O N 'Q mNr tD O r to M O O O O) tD N P P O st Nc0 N t0 M M tD aD r N N Mco rnV`OuaMm Fes- `° rn rn o or`O rn o ;D to to mCO N rn ti N N M N N M N J E Q w m a LL LL c9 z= w g to a U p p g to w W 0 wCD N C c c Q N mm y9 J JL mm m O O m a co 0 0 q m tp Qi N qm 00 N i O q 'D q N Q ' N O m O q O q C m c q E U o U E q c m c _ m o m 0 N m m z U E m c w a m a c m a 0 3 v U c c m a Q u� c Q H- C O LL m O m J m m Q Q q m m O _ 0 -e 3 O o m r > m Q U y 0 m c -4,m m o v a m Y > > C m r a m U LL x= 5-1� a d in in m' 3 3 O W 'K R o00 O M VM j� < c4 cro W V co U) c Q W X cl Z W IL IL Q P/T#3 Dieringer School District Updated Capital Facility Plan information. ATTACHMENT #2 For the purposes of the 2003 amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan, we would like each school district to use the format as outlined in the tables below. Table IX PS 1 Complete -this table as in Pierce County's 2002. Capital Facilities Plan, listing each elementary, each intermediate/middle/junior high, and each high school (see attachment #1). Table IX -PS -1. Current Facilities Inventory Public Schools The inventory of current Public School capital facilities includes the following: Capacity Name (Number of Students) Location Dieringer School District Lake Tapps Elementary 500 1320-178` Ave. E., Sumner Dieringer Heights Elementary 475 21727-34`x' St. E., Sumner North Tapps Middle School 510 20029-12`h St. E., Sumner High School 0 TOTAL 1485 Dieringer School District 2003 Capital Facilities Plan Table IX -P S.2. You do not need to provide any information regarding this table from attachment #1. Table IX -PS -2A. Complete this table by indicating the level of service in square feet per student, which has been established at each level (elementary, intermediate/middle/junior high, high school) for your school district. Table IX-PS.2A. School District Service Standards Public School Facilities (Square Feet per Student) Elementary Middle Junior High Senior High District Name Schools Schools Schools Schools Dieringer 88.4 116.6 NA NA ATTACHMENT IX -PS -2-1 Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2003 Capital Facilities Plan. List proposed individual capacity projects for 2003 -2008. ATTACHMENT IX -PS -2-1 Public- School Facilities INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY PROJECTS Name Capacity Dieringer School District 0 Elementary 0 Intennediate/Middle/Jr. High ------- 0 Senior High NA 2 Table IX -PS -3. Please provide the information for one time period, 2002-2007. Table IX -PS -3: CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds lx $1,000) Public School Facilities Sources/Uses. 2003-2008 Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Bond Proceeds, Reserve $474 New Revenue: Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments $12,275 Total Sources $12,749 Uses of Funds Capacity Projects: -0- -0- Subtotal $12,749 Non-Capacity Projects: Subtotal $12,749 Total Costs $12,749 Balance Surplus or (Deficit) -0- Table IX -PS -5. The "total Cost" in the following table shows the total cost of capacity projects needed to meet the level of service standards for school facilities. To calculate "Total Cost," you can use the following formula: Total Cost Net Deficiency (from "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column) x School District Cost per Student (from Table IX -PS -5A.) Because "School District Cost Per Student" (from Table IX -PS -5A.) differs among the elementary, intermediate/middle/junior high, and high schools, separate calculations need to be made for each, and then added together to obtain the "Total Cost" figure. If the "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column shows a nekv reserve, the "Total Cost" column will be zero. Table IX -PS -5. Capital Facility Requirements, to 2008 Public School Facilities (See Table IX -PS -5A for individual rates at each level.) Time Period Student Student Net Reserve Total Cost Population/ Student Demand Capacity or (Deficiency) (Cost/Student x Net Deficiency) 2003 Actual 1,128 1,485 357 2003-2008 Growth 1,252 1,485 232 Non -Capacity Costs 12,749* Total Cost as of 2008 12,749* *The district will replace Lake Tapps Elementary with a new facility in 2005. 4 Table IX -PS -5A. Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2003 Capital Facilities Plan. If possible, use 2003 dollars. If you are using dollars from a different year, indicate the year. Table IX -PS -5A. School District Cost Per Student Public School Facilities (2003 Dollars) District Name Elementary Middle Junior High Senior High Schools Schools Schools Schools Dieringer 23,200 25,668 5 N MI 1 Chapter 9 -Environment Element Amendments to: a) Provide greater clarity and focus on the value and role of native plantings and vegetation; b) Support enhancement of Mill Creek wetlands; and, c) Support low impact development techniques. NOTE: Excerpts only. Only sections of this Chapter amended are included. CHAPTER 9 THE ENVIRONMENT Introduction One of the key attractions of Auburn and the Puget Sound Region has always been the abundant natural resources found throughout the area. The Green River Valley was once a major supplier of agricultural goods for the region and farming remains in some parts of the valley. Thick forests, wetlands, and wildlife habitats are found throughout the area. As the area develops, many of these features, which serve to make the area attractive in the first place, are being lost. The strong emphasis placed on the designation and protection of resource lands and critical areas in the Growth Management Act, the Countywide Policies and this plan reflect the important role that these areas play in maintaining the health, safety and welfare of the area's citizens. Issues Environmental Constraints and Land Use The City's overall environmental policy should describe the kinds of environmental information and factors that are important to the community. This information can be used to decide if, where and how certain kinds of development and other activities should be allowed. City policy should recognize the natural constraints placed on development by such factors as unstable slopes, flooding and wetlands. A critical environmental concern is the proper management of gravel extraction. This is an industry which has been active in Auburn for many years and which remains a viable industry. The City should establish clear policies to guide the retention of valued aspects of the City's environment, such as protection of the City's open space and significant wildlife habitats. The policy should seek to ensure ample Page 9-1 Environment be severely impacted or destroyed by the uncontrolled release of contaminated storm waters. Prior to utilizing natural systems for storm drainage purposes, the City shall carefully consider the potential for adverse impacts through the environmental review process. Important natural systems shall not be used for storm drainage storage or conveyance, unless it can be demonstrated that adverse impacts can be adequately mitigated to a less than significant level EN -17 The City recognizes that stormwater treatment facilities do not function efficiently unless maintained. The City shall strive to ensure that public and private stormwater collection, detention and treatment systems are properly maintained and functioning as designed. EN17A Encourage the use of low impact development techniques in public and private development _proposals in order to minimize impervious surfaces and improve water quality. Objective 18.2. To continue to enhance and maintain the quality of air resources in the City and Region. Policies: EN -18 The City shall seek to secure and maintain such levels of air quality as will protect human health, prevent injury to plant and animal life, prevent injury to property, foster the comfort and convenience of area inhabitants, and facilitate the enjoyment of the natural attractions of the area. EN -19 The City will continue to support and rely on the various State, Federal and local programs to continue to protect and enhance air quality. EN -20 The City shall encourage the retention of vegetation and encourage landscaping in order to provide filtering of suspended particulates. EN -21 The City shall support an increased role for public transportation as a means to reduce locally generated air emissions. EN -22 The City shall consider the impacts of new development on air quality as a part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigating measures. Page 9-5 Chapter 9 Objective 18.3. To continue to enhance and maintain the quality of land, wildlife and vegetative resources in the City and region. Policies: EN -23 The City shall seek to protect any unique, rare or endangered species of plants and animals found within the City by preventing the indiscriminate and unnecessary removal of trees and groundcover; by promoting the design and development of landscaped areas which provide food and cover for wildlife; and by protecting and enhancing the quality of aquatic habitat. EN -24 The City shall consider the impacts of new development on the quality of land, known or suspected fish and wildlife habitats (Map 9.2) and vegetative resources as a part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigating measures. Such mitigation may involve the retention of significant habitats and the use of native landscape vegetation. EN -25 The preferred method of crossing a watercourse that has habitat suitable for anadromous fish use or that has the potential to be rehabilitated for fish use in the future is a bridge. The use of culverts shall be discouraged as a crossing method for such watercourses. Culvert systems may be considered if streambeds similar to natural channels can be provided, no loss of anadromous fish habitat will occur or the cost of a bridge is prohibitive as reasonable method of mitigation. EN -26 The City shall work in collaboration with other agencies, the development community and other affected or interested parties to protect identified wildlife corridors and encourage the clustering of significant or adjacent resources to maintain connectivity of these systems. Objective 18.4. To continue to enhance and maintain the quality of important wetland resources in the City and region. EN -27 The City recognizes the important biological and hydrological roles that wetlands play in providing plant and animal habitat, protecting water quality, reducing the need for man-made flood and storm drainage systems, maintaining water quality, and in providing recreational, open space, educational and cultural Page 9-6 Environment opportunities. The City will consider these roles and functions in all new development, and will also pursue opportunities to enhance the existing wetland system when these multiple benefits can be achieved. EN -28 The City recognizes that wetlands provide varying degrees of biological and hydrological functions and values to the community depending on the size, complexity and location of the individual system, and that the overall degree of functions and values should be considered when reviewing proposals which impact wetlands. In a similar manner, the levels of protection afforded to a wetland shall be consistent with its existing function and values. The City shall continue to promote policies and practices of enhancing the wetlands that are hydraulically connected to the river systems to improve fish resources and aquatic habitat. EN -29 The City shall consider the impacts of new development on the quality of wetland resources as part of its environmental review process and shall require appropriate mitigation and monitoring measures of important wetland areas. Such mitigation may involve conservation, enhancement or restoration or replacement of important wetlands, and provisions for appropriate buffering. The goal of the mitigation should be no net loss of wetland functions and values. A permanent deed restriction shall be placed on any wetlands created or enhanced to ensure that they are preserved in perpetuity. EN -30 Wetlands which are associated with a river or stream, or provide significant plant and animal habitat opportunities are recognized by the City as the most important wetland systems, and shall receive the highest degree of protection and mitigation through conservation, enhancement or relocation measures. Wetlands which are limited in size, are isolated from major hydrological systems or provide limited hydrological or plant and animal habitat opportunities may be considered by the City for development and displacement in conjunction with appropriate mitigation. EN -31 Speculative filling of wetlands shall only be permitted if in compliance with the Special Area Management Plan for Mill Creek, when it is adopted. EN -32 It is the City's intent to pursue development of an area -wide wetlands management program for the entire City to establish a Page 9-7 Chapter 9 systems approach to wetlands management. The City shall work with adjacent communities to adopt and implement the Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) for the Mill Creek Basin, a draft version of which has been developed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The purpose of the SAMP is to establish uniform wetland definitions and methodology throughout the planning area, to develop a regional consensus and predictability by identifying important wetlands which must be conserved and less important wetlands which may be developed. The SAMP is intended to ensure a balance of the City's commitment between environmental and economic development interests. The City shall strive to streamline the permitting process for development in the areas covered by the SAMP. Map 9.3: General Location of Wetlands Map Note: This map provides an illustration of wetlands located within Auburn. Prepared on an area -wide basis, the inventory map provides a general delineation of known wetlands based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers definition and the 1989 Federal Manual For Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands field methodology. It is important to note that this map is only a wetland inventory and not a wetland plan. Over time wetlands develop, expand and contract in conjunction with changing climatic, natural and artificial conditions. The map does not imply that a parcel covered by a wetland designation is fully occupied by wetlands. It is an indicator, however, that an in depth wetland delineation is required. Therefore, future site specific wetland studies conducted by the property owner will identify the precise location, delineation and functional characteristics of known wetland areas, and additional wetland areas, not previously inventoried. The Auburn Planning Department has wetland reports that can provide information regarding soils, hydrology, vegetation and wildlife for these wetlands. Objective 18.5. To recognize the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and to promote its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given to promoting the use of native vegetation Policies: Page 9-8 Environment EN -33 The City recognizes the important benefits of native vegetation including its role in attracting native wildlife, preserving the natural hydrology, and maintaining the natural character of the Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the use of pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants that may enter nearby water systems) and reduce watering required of non-native species (thereby promoting conservation). The City shall - encourage the use of native vegetation as an integral part of public and private development plans through strategies that include, but are not limited to, the following: o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes and in public facilities. o Providing greater clarity in development regulations in how native plants can be used in private development proposals. o Pursuing opportunities to educate the public about the benefits of native1p ants. EN -33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of native plant materials that complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest and which are adaptable, to the climatic hydrological characteristics of the region. Regulations should provide specificity as to native plant types in order to facilitate their use. EN -34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in new development. EN -35 The City shall encourage the use of water conserving plants in landscaping for both public and private projects. EN -36 The City shall update and amend its landscaping ordinances to ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development. Emphasis should be placed on higher quality and quantity of landscaping. EN -37 The City shall strengthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at protecting large stands of trees and significant trees within the City. P/T#5 Chapter 7 - Transportation Element Update Figure 7.3 with updated Six - Year TIP ■■o P/T#6 Update to Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project Lists for Period 2004 - 2009 City of Auburn 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 931-3000 www.ci.auburn.wa.us City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CAPITAL COSTS OF FACILITIES TYPE OF FACILITY 2004-2009 COST (X$11,000) 2003-2008 COST (x $1,000) CHANGE Airport 2,271 1,871 400 Cemetery 490 490 - Community Center 5,000 3,300 1,700 Community Improvement 8,715 10,903 2,188 Fire Projection 300 1,610 1,310 General Municipal Buildings 18,200 30,700 12,500 Golf Course 3,405 3,575 170 Parks and Recreation 7,610 8,200 590 Sewer 13,078 8,430 4,648 Storm Drainage 5,647 6,250 (603 Transportation 237,836 111,635 126,201 Water 6,887 5,398 1,489 TOTAL 309,439 192,362 117,077 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES REVENUE SOURCE 2004-2009 (X $1,000) 2003-2008' (X $1,000) Change CAPITAL FACILITY Existing Revenue Operating Revenue 259 160 219 160 CemeteryEndowed Care Interest 330 330 ]40Airport CemeteryGeneral Fund 315 300 200 1,170 300 1,610 200 890 (1,3Fire - 280 Community Improvement Protection General and Municipal Buildings Parks and Recreation Capital Projects Fund 3,200 5,603(2,403 CommunityImprovement Commercial Retail Fund 200 - 200 Community Improvement General and Municipal Buildings General Government Revenues 5,000 - 5,000 User Fees 630 800 170 Golf Course Real Estate Excise Tax 1,975 2,595 620 Parks and Recreation City Revenue 8,538 14,897 6,359 Transportation Utility Revenue 6,022 5,792 5,647 6,621 5,148 6,250 (599) 644 603 Sewer Water Storm Drainage King County Open Space Bond 27 40 13 Transportation Subtotal 39,765 45,663 5,898 New Revenues FAA Grant 1,956 1,596 360 Airport State Grant 56 56 - Airport Other Grants 800 - 800 IParks and Recreation KC Youth Sports Grant 50 50 - Parks and Recreation Community Development Block Grant - 150 150 Parks and Recreation King County Conservation Futures 600 600 - Parks and Recreation State Grant IAC 600 600 - Parks and Recreation Salmon Recovery Fund 240 240 - Parks and Recreation State Aquatic Lands 300 300 - Parks and Recreation Washington Historic Preservation Grant 400 400 - Parks and Recreation Developer 1,200 3,440 2,100 7,900 (900) 4,460 Parks and Recreation Transportation Mitigation MIT, LID, other agencies, etc. 47,686 10,435 37,251 Transportation Impact Fees 1,395 1,305 90 Transportation Private Donation 200 125 75 Parks and Recreation American Legion Post 78 75 150 75 Parks and Recreation Voted GO Bonds 5,000 5,000 7,000 2,775 3,300 5,000 30,500 2,775 1,700 - (23,500) - Community Center Community Improvement General Municipal Buildings Golf Course Certificates of Participation 6,000 - 6,000 General and Municipal Buildings Grants 176,750 77,058 99,692 Transportation Muckleshoot Tribe 5,064 1,809 3,255 Sewer Public Works Trust Fund Loan 915 1,992 250 - 665 1,992 Water Sewer City of Algona 180 - 1 180 Water Subtotal 269,674 146,699 122,975 TOTAL 309,439 192,362 117,077 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 2009 Capacity Projects: 1. Phase 1 Planning of 23 acre site Cost Rev - FAA Grant Rev - Operating Revenue Subtotal 0.0 Non -Capacity Projects: 2. Property Acquisition - Park and Ride Cost Rev - FAA Grant Rev - Operating Revenue 3. Parallel Taxiways Slurry Seal Cost Rev - State Grant Rev - Operating Revenue 4. Runway Rehabilitation Estimated Project Cost: 900.0 Cost 900.0 Rev - FAA Grant 810.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 90.0 75.0 75.0 150.0 67.5 67.5 135.0 7.5 7.5 15.0 75.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 S. Transient & Northern Based Aircraft Apron Slurry Seal Cost 77.5 Rev - FAA Grant 69.7 Rev - State Grant 3.9 Rev - Operating Revenue 3.9 100.0 700.0 800.0 90.0 630.0 720.0 10.0 70.0 80.0 6. Airport West Access Signing & Parking Improvements Cost 130.0 Rev - FAA Grant 117.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 13.0 7. Airport Security Fencing (Park and Ride) Cost 50.0 Rev - FAA Grant 45.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 5.0 8. North Taxilane Fog Seal Cost Rev - State Grant Rev - Operating Revenue 3 95.0 47.5 47.5 2.6 1.3 1.3 95.0 47.5 47.5 77.5 69.7 3.9 3.9 130.0 117.0 13.0 50.0 45.0 5.0 2.6 1.3 1.3 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL 9. South Apron Slurry Seal Cost 65.8 65.8 Rev - FAA Grant 59.2 59.2 Rev - State Grant 3.3 3.3 Rev - Operating Revenue 3.3 3.3 Subtotal 900.0 77.5 280.0 863.4 0.0 0.0 2,120.9 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 0.0 .75.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 Non -Capacity Projects 900.0 77.5 280.0 863.4 0.0 0.0 2,120.9 Total Costs 900.0 152.5 355.0 863.4 0.0 0.0 2,270.9 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - Operating Revenue 90.0 11.4 35.5 122.1 0.0 0.0 259.0 Subtotal 90.0 11.4 35.5 122.1 0.0 0.0 259.0 NEW REVENUES: Rev - FAA Grant 810.0 137.2 319.5 689.2 0.0 0.0 1,955.9 Rev - State Grant 0.0 3.9 0.0 52.1 0.0 0.0 56.0 Subtotal 810.0 141.1 319.5 741.3 0.0 0.0 2,011.9 Total Revenues 900.0 152.5 355.0 863.4 0.0 0.0 2,270.9 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN'' (All Projects Are Times $1,000) CEMETERY , 0.0 240.0 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL `-- Capacity Projects BALANCE 0.0 0.0 1. New Mausoleum (ph 1 & 2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cost 140.0 150.0 290.0 Rev - Endowed Care Int. 140.0 40.0 180.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 110.0 110.0 2. Section 10 (phase 1) Cost 100.0 100.0 Rev - Endowed Care Int. 100.0 100.0 3. Section 6A Construction Cost 100.0 100.0 Rev - Endowed Care Int. 50.0 50.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 50.0 50.0 Subtotal 0.0 240.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 0.0 240.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 Total Costs 0.0 240.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - Endowed Care Int. 0.0 240.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 330.0 Rev - Operating Revenue 0.0 0.0 160.0 0.0 0.0 160.0 Subtotal 0.0 240.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 Total Revenues 0.0 240.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 490.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 n. CFP PROJECTS ANDFINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) COMMUNITY CENTER COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008''' 2009 TOTAL Capacity Projects: 1. Convert and Expand Existing YMCA to a Community Building (+35,000 sq ft) Cost 5,000.0 5,000.0 Rev - G.O. Bonds 5,000.0 5,000.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Total Costs 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 EXISTING REVENUES: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW REVENUES: Rev - G.O. Bonds 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Subtotal 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Total Revenues 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n. City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) COMMUNITYIMPROVEMENT COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Non -Capacity Projects: 1. Downtown Public/Private Redevelopment: purchase property;construct new Buildings; renovate existing buildings Cost 700.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 3,200.0 Rev - Capital Projects Fund 700.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 3,200.0 2. Gateway Projects (one major project every 2-3 years; minor gateway/beautification projects each year) Cost 30.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 315.0 Rev - General Fund 30.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 315.0 3. Second Downtown Parking Garage Cost 5,000.0 5,000.0 Rev - G.O. Bonds 5,000.0 5,000.0 4. Transit Station Retail Space Tenant Improvements Cost 200.0 200.0 Rev - Commercial Retail Fund 200.0 200.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects Non -Capacity Projects 930.0 5,585.0 515.0 585.0 515.0 585.0 8,715.0 Total Costs 930.0 5,585.0 515.0 585.0 515.0 585.0 8,715.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - General Fund 30.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 15.0 85.0 315.0 Rev - Capital Projects Fund 700.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 3,200.0 Rev - Commercial Retail Fund 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 Subtotal 930.0 585.0 515.0 585.0 515.0 585.0 3,715.0 NEW REVENUES: Rev - G.O. Bonds 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Subtotal 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Total Revenues 930.0 5,585.0 515.0 585.0 515.0 585.0 8,715.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 E* CFP PROJECTS AND.FINANCING PLAN " (Alf Projects Are Times $1,000) FIRE PROTECTION COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL' Non -Capacity Projects: 1. Apparatus Replacement: Engines = 20 year and Aid Vehicle =15 year replacement schedule Costs 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Rev - General Fund Transfer 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Non -Capacity Projects 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Total Costs 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - General Fund Transfer 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Total Revenues 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E* City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 " CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) GENERAL MUNICIPALBUILDINGS COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Capacity Projects: I. New Public Safety Building (+XXXXXX sq ft) Cost 11,000.0 11,000.0 Rev - Certificates of Participation 6,000.0 6,000.0 Rev - General Gov't Rev 5,000.0 5,000.0 Non -Capacity Projects: 2. Fire Station Replacement/Relocation Cost - Land 1,000.0 1,000.0 Cost - Construction 3,000.0 3,000.0 6,000.0 Rev - G.O. Bonds 4,000.0 3,000.0 7,000.0 3. City Hall: Plaza Restoration Cost 200.0 200.0 Rev - General Fund 200.0 200.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 0.0 11,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,000.0 Non -Capacity Projects 200.0 4,000.0 0.0 3,000.0 0.0 7,200.0 Total Costs 200.0 15,000.0 0.0 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 18,200.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - General Fund 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 Rev - General Gov't Rev 0.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000.0 Subtotal 200.0 5,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,200.0 NEW REVENUES: Rev - G.O Bonds 0.0 4,000.0 0.0 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 7,000.0 Rev - Certificates of Participation 0.0 6,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,000.0 Subtotal 0.0 10,000.0 0.0 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 13,000.0 Total Revenues 200.0 15,000.0 0.0 3,000.0 0.0 0.0 18,200.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) GOLF COURSE COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2006 2009 TOT) Non -Capacity Projects 50.0 1. Construct New Clubhouse & Parking 3,405.0 Cost 2,775.0 Rev - G.O. Bond 2,775.0 2. Rebuild No.13,14, and 11 Fairway & Green Cost 165.0 215.0 Rev - Greens Fees 165.0 215.0 3. Irrigate No. 3,4,5 Fairway 150.0 Cost 50.0 Rev - Greens Fees 0.0 4. Miscellaneous Improvements 0.0 Cost 0.0 Rev - Greens Fees 150.0 150.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Non -Capacity Projects Total Costs 165.0 2,990.0 150.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - Greens Fees 165.0 215.0 150.0 Subtotal 165.0 215.0 150.0 NEW REVENUES: Rev - G.O. Bond Total Revenues BALANCE 2,775.0 2,775.0 380.01 380.0 150.01 150.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 3,405.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 630.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 630.0 0.0 2,775.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,775.0 Subtotal 0.0 2,775.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,775.0 165.0 2,990.0 150.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 3,405.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Ate Times $1,000) PARKS AND RECREATION COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009'' TOTAL Capacity Projects: Community Parks I. Lakeland Hills Community Park (8 acres) Develop passive parks, playtoy, irrigation, etc. Cost 250.0 250.0 Rev - Developer 200.0 200.0 Rev - Reet 50.0 50.0 2. Lakeland Hills (40 acres) Develop open space, restrooms, active space, playtoy, trails, and picnic shelter Cost 2,000.0 2,000.0 Rev - Reet 200.0 200.0 Rev - Developer 1,000.0 1,000.0 Rev - Other Grants 800.0 800.0 Subtotal 0.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,000.0 2,250.0 Non -Capacity Projects: Neighborhood Parks 3. Cedar Lanes Park Development Landscape development, trail work, tables, picnic area, and playtoy. Cost 150.0 150.0 Rev - REET 75.0 75.0 Rev - Private Funds 75.0 75.0 Community Parks 4. Olson Canyon Farm Implement master plan - Building and Grounds. Cost Rev - Grant - Wa St Historic Preservation Rev - Private Donation Rev. General Fund 300.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 150.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 150.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 5. Les Gove Park Improvement Irrigation, playground, drinking fountains, and ballfield enhancements. Cost 250.0 Rev - General Fund 200.0 Rev - King Co. Youth Sports Grant 50.0 1,050.0 400.0 125.0 525.0 250.0 200.0 50.0 6. Veteran's Park Redevelopment Community Building Replacement Cost 175.0 175.0 Rev - General Fund 100.0 100.0 Rev - American Legion Post 78 75.0 75.0 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL' 7. Fenster Farm Site Plan/Phase 1 Development Coordinate with King Co and State on development with natural habitat area. Cost 25.0 600.0 625.0 Rev - General Fund 25.0 60.0 85.0 Rev - State Salmon Recovery Fund 240.0 240.0 Rev - State Aquatic Lands Enhancement 300.0 300.0 8. Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Coordinate with ASD on Master Site Plan for 29 acre site. Cost 30.0 30.0 Rev - General Fund 30.0 30.0 9. Interurban Trail Trail enhancements Cost 50.0 50.0 Rev - General Fund 50.0 50.0 10. Fulmer Park Addition Develop additional acre received from water utility. Cost 150.0 150.0 Rev - REET 150.0 150.0 11. Misc. Improvements Major park improvements including athletic fields, shelters, roofs, playgrounds, and restrooms. Cost 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 500.0 Rev - REET 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 500.0 Park Acquistions Acquisitions to occur based on demand and deficiencies including corridors and trails. Cost 600.0 200.0 600.0 200.0 600.0 2,200.0 Rev - REET 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 1,000.0 Rev - State Grant (IAC) 200.0 200.0 200.0 600.0 Rev - KCCF 200.0 200.0 200.0 600.0 Special Use Areas 13. Public Art Cost 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 180.0 Rev - General Fund 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 180.0 Subtotal 180.0 1,710.0 1,180.0 980.0 580.0 730.0 12 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects Community Parks 0.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,000.0 2,250.0 Subtotal 0.0 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,000.0 2,250.0 Non -Capacity Projects Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Areas Subtotal Total Costs EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - General Fund Rev - Real Estate Excise Tax Subtotal NEW REVENUES: Rev - King Co. Youth Sports Grant Rev - Developer Rev - KCCF Rev - State Grant (IAC) Rev - State Salmon Recovery Fund Rev - State Aquatic Lands Rev - Wa St Historic Preservation Grt Rev - Private Donation Rev - American Legion Post 78 Rev - Other Grants Subtotal Total Revenues BALANCE 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 0.0 1,680.0 1,150.0 950.0 550.0 700.0 5,030.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 180.0 180.0 1,710.0 1,180.0 980.0 580.0 730.0 5,360.0 180.0 1,960.0 1,180.0 980.0 30.0 585.0 215.0 155.0 75.0 500.0 300.0 300.0 105.0 1,085.0 515.0 455.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 240.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 125.0 125.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 875.0 665.0 525.0 180.0 1,960.0 1,180.0 980.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 580.0 2,730.0 7,610.0 155.0 30.0 1,170.0 300.0 500.0 1,975.0 455.0 530.0 3,145.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,200.0 0.0 200.0 600.0 0.0 200.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 240.0 0.0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 125.0 0.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 800.0 800.0 125.0 2,200.0 4,465.0 580.0 2,730.0 7,610.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) SEWER 1,300.0 Rev - City 1,275.0 25.0 1,300.0 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Capacity Projects (Expansions) 1 Auburn Way South Sanitary Sewer Replacement / Upgrade - C9056 - Section B,C,D,E,A The construction of this project is considered 40% Repair and 60% Expansion Rev - City 75.0 150.0 Expansion - Increases the service ability of the AWS sewer line Cost 525.0 1,966.7 730.2 1,567.2 456.7 5,245.8 Rev - City 25.0 - 6.9 963.8 70.3 1,066.1 Rev - PWTF . 500.0 1,142.0 1,642.0 Rev - MIT 824.7 723.3 603.4 386.4 2,537.8 2 Auburn Way South Sanitary Sewer Replacement/ Upgrade - Design 100% The construction of this project is considered 40% Repair and 60% Expansion Expansion - Increases the service ability of the AWS sewer line Cost 850.0 850.0 Rev - City 241.4 241.4 Rev - MIT 608.6 608.6 Subtotal 1,375.0 1,966.7 730.2 1,567.2 456.7 - 6,095.8 Non -Capacity Projects: 3 Auburn Way South Sanitary Sewer Replacement / Upgrade - C9066 - Section B,C,D,E,A The construction of this project is considered 40% Repair and 60% Expansion Repair Replacement - increasing the useful life of the facilities Cost 350.0 1,311.1 486.8 1,044.8 304.5 3,497.2 Rev - City - 279.1 260.9 642.6 46.9 1,229.5 Rev - PWTF 350.0 350.0 Rev - MIT 1,032.0 225.9 402.2 257.6 1,917.7 4 2003 - 2004 Renewal and Replacement of Damaged and Broken Sewer Lines - Renewal and Replacement Cost 1,275.0 25.0 1,300.0 Rev - City 1,275.0 25.0 1,300.0 5 2005 Renewal and Replacement of Damaged and Broken Sewer Lines Renewal and Replacement Cost 75.0 150.0 225.0 Rev - City 75.0 150.0 225.0 6 2007 Renewal and Replacement of Damaged and Broken Sewer Lines Renewal and Replacement Cost 125.0 1,250.0 1,375.0 Rev - City 125.0 1,250.0 1,375.0 7 2009 Renewal and Replacement of Damaged and Broken Sewer Lines Renewal and Replacement Cost 25.0 150.0 175.0 Rev - City 25.0 150.0 175.0 14 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL 8 2011 Renewal and Replacement of Damaged and Broken Sewer Lines 730.2 Renewal and Replacement 456.7 Cost _ Rev - City 0.0 - 9 Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update - MS711 611.8 Improvement - Update the existing sanitary sewer comprehensive plan. 354.5 Cost 60.0 25.0 85.0 Rev - City 60.0 25.0 85.0 10 F Street and Rainier Ridge & Rainier Shadows PS Investigation and Modifications 1,342.0 Backflow prevention devices and redundant float alarms. 811.2 Cost 20.0 100.0 120.0 Rev - City 20.0 100.0 120.0 11 Siphon Flow Diversion Divert Flows away from the Cobble Creek Community and the river siphon located next to the golf course. Cost 55.0 55.0 Rev - City 55.0 55.0 12 Goedecke Half Street Improvement 2,916.4 Support the West Valley improvements fronting Goedecke South. 150.0 Cost 150.0 150.0 Rev - City 150.0 150.0 Subtotal 1,925.0 1,586.1 611.8 2,354.8 354.5 150.0 6,982.2 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 1,375.0 1,966.7 730.2 1,567.2 456.7 0.0 6,095.8 Non -Capacity Projects 1,925.0 1,586.1 611.8 2,354.8 354.5 150.0 6,982.2 Total Costs 3,300.0 3,552.8 1,342.0 3,922.0 811.2 150.0 13,078.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - City 1,841.4 554.1 392.8 2,916.4 167.2 150.0 6,021.9 Subtotal 1,841.4 554.1 392.8 2,916.4 167.2 150.0 6,021.9 NEW REVENUES: Rev - MIT 608.6 1,856.7 949.2 1,005.6 644.0 0.0 5,064.1 Rev - PWTF 850.0 1,142.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,992.0 Subtotal 1,458.6 2,998.7 949.2 1,005.6 644.0 0.0 7,056.1 Total Revenues 3,300.0 3,552.8 1,342.0 3,922.0 811.2 150.0 13,078.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 Non -Capacity Projects: 2 Pipelines & Surface Conveyance BC -23 Improvement - Upgrade existing conveyance system along K St. SE from 19th to 21 st St. SE Cost 30.0 30.0 Rev - City 30.0 30.0 BC -14 Improvement - Upgrade existing trunk system from along R St. SE from 21st to 25th St SE Cost 1,300.0 1,300.0 Rev - City 1,300.0 1,300.0 BC -22 Improvement - Construct overflow infiltration facility at Pioneer Elementary School Cost 20.0 1,456.0 1,476.0 Rev - City 20.0 1,456.0 1,476.0 E-2 Improvement - Increase capacity of existing drainage ditch along H St. NW extended from 6th St. to 15th St. NW Cost 20.0 479.0 499.0 Rev - City 20.0 479.0 499.0 BC -24 Improvement - Construct overflow infiltration facility at Terminal Park Elementary School Cost 50.0 952.0 1,002.0 Rev - City 50.0 952.0 1,002.0 3 Retention, Detention, Water Quality Local Capital Improvement Projects - Pond Improvements Cost 125.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 625.0 Rev - City 125.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 625.0 Mill Creek Enhancement Improvement - Storm Drainage Utility Participation Cost 20.0 20.0 Rev - City 20.0 20.0 P-2 Improvement - Construct Clay St. Water Quality Facility Cost 145.0 145.0 Rev - City 145.0 145.0 99 `CFP PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) STORM' COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Capacity Projects: 1 Developer Participation Cost effective utility participation in future undesignated developer projects Cost 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Rev - City 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Subtotal 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Non -Capacity Projects: 2 Pipelines & Surface Conveyance BC -23 Improvement - Upgrade existing conveyance system along K St. SE from 19th to 21 st St. SE Cost 30.0 30.0 Rev - City 30.0 30.0 BC -14 Improvement - Upgrade existing trunk system from along R St. SE from 21st to 25th St SE Cost 1,300.0 1,300.0 Rev - City 1,300.0 1,300.0 BC -22 Improvement - Construct overflow infiltration facility at Pioneer Elementary School Cost 20.0 1,456.0 1,476.0 Rev - City 20.0 1,456.0 1,476.0 E-2 Improvement - Increase capacity of existing drainage ditch along H St. NW extended from 6th St. to 15th St. NW Cost 20.0 479.0 499.0 Rev - City 20.0 479.0 499.0 BC -24 Improvement - Construct overflow infiltration facility at Terminal Park Elementary School Cost 50.0 952.0 1,002.0 Rev - City 50.0 952.0 1,002.0 3 Retention, Detention, Water Quality Local Capital Improvement Projects - Pond Improvements Cost 125.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 625.0 Rev - City 125.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 625.0 Mill Creek Enhancement Improvement - Storm Drainage Utility Participation Cost 20.0 20.0 Rev - City 20.0 20.0 P-2 Improvement - Construct Clay St. Water Quality Facility Cost 145.0 145.0 Rev - City 145.0 145.0 99 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 4 Comp. Plan Revision, Regulatory Comprehensive Drainage Plan Update Cost 250.0 250.0 Rev - City 250.0 250.0 Subtotal 1,565.0 2,035.0 1,197.0 100.0 350.0 100.0 5,347.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 300.0 Non -Capacity Projects 1,565.0 2,035.0 1,197.0 100.0 350.0 100.0 5,347.0 Total Costs 1,615.0 2,085.0 1,247.0 150.0 400.0 150.0 5,647.0 Existing Revenues Rev -City 1,615.0 2,085.0 1,247.0 150.0 400.0 150.0 5,647.0 Total Revenue 1,615.0 2,085.0 1,247.0 150.0 400.0 150.0 5,647.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP 'PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) TRANSPORTATION - COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL CAPACITY PROJECTS: 1. 3rd Street SE/'Cross Street SE - S. Division to Auburn Way South Estimated Project Cost: 1,746.0 Cost 1,720.0 1,720.0 Rev -City 326.0 326.0 Rev - Grant 1,183.0 1,183.0 Rev - Impact Fees 211.0 211.0 2. S 277th - AWN to Green River Bridge Estimated Project Cost: 2,770.0 Cost 5.0 325.0 300.0 630.0 Rev -City 5.0 65.0 60.0 130.0 Rev - Grant 260.0 240.0 500.0 3. A' Street NW - Phase 1 Estimated Project Cost: 7,676.0 Cost 10.0 100.0 923.0 921.0 2,000.0 3,418.0 7,372.0 Rev - City 10.0 75.0 75.0 200.0 342.0 702.0 Rev - Grant 738.0 736.0 1,600.0 2,734.0 5,808.0 Rev - Impact Fees 100.0 50.0 50.0 200.0 Rev - Other 60.0 60.0 200.0 342.0 662.0 4. "M' Street SE - BNSF grade separation Estimated Project Cost: 24,651.0 Cost 5.0 295.0 5,000.0 7,929.0 13,229.0 Rev - City 21.0 560.0 215.0 796.0 Rev - Grant 240.0 4,200.0 7,363.0 11,803.0 Rev - Impact Fees 5.0 34.0 100.0 139.0 Rev - Other 240.0 251.0 491.0 5. 41st Street SE and A Street SE Estimated Project Cost: 334.0 Cost 202.0 202.0 Rev - City 172.0 172.0 Rev - Impact Fees 0.0 Rev - Other 30.0 30.0 6. 'C' Street NW - West Main to 3rd NW Estimated Project Cost: 1,550.0 Cost 150.0 500.0 900.0 1,550.0 Rev - City 16.0 60.0 76.0 Rev - Grant 120.0 400.0 720.0 1,240.0 Rev - Impact Fees 14.0 100.0 120.0 234.0 7. ' F ' Street SE - 4th Street SE to Auburn Way South Estimated Project Cost: 1,500.0 Cost 50.0 100.0 1,350.0 1,500.0 Rev - City 20.0 84.0 104.0 Rev - Grant 80.0 1,080.0 1,160.0 Rev - Impact Fees 50.0 186.0 236.0 f:] City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL 8. 8th Street NE and Auburn Way North Estimated Project Cost: 350.0 Cost 350.0 350.0 Rev - City 336.0 336.0 Rev - Other 14.0 14.0 9. '1' Street NE - 32nd Street NE to 33rd Street NE Estimated Project Cost: 300.0 Cost 240.0 Rev - Developer_ 240.0 10. C St SW Elingson Road to 15th St SW Estimated Project Cost: 4,000.0 Cost 4,000.0 Rev - Grant 2,000.0 Rev - Developer 2,000.0 11 15th Street SW Reconstruction Estimated Project Cost: 2,400 Cost 1,000.0 1,390.0 Rev - City 30.0 Rev - Grant 970.0 1,390.0 12 ' 1 ' Street NE - 40th Street NE to 52nd Street NE Estimated Project Cost: 5,300.0 Cost 45.0 495.0 800.0 4,000.0 Rev - City 45.0 Rev - Developer 400.0 800.0 Rev - Impact Fees 95.0 Rev - Other 4,000.0 13 Auburn Way S 6th Street SE to M Street SE (Phase 1, 2 and 3) State Project Estimated Project Cost: 1,787.0 Cost 1,409.0 Rev - City 864.0 Rev - Grant 545.0 14 'M' St NE - E Main to 8th NE/Harvey Rd Estimated Project Cost: 1,600.0 Cost 200.0 500.0 Rev - City 40.0 Rev - Grant 160.0 400.0 Rev - Impact Fees 100.0 15 'A' Street NW -Phase 2 Estimated Project Cost: 2,516.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant 930.0 30.0 720.0 180.0 382.0 76.0 306.0 240.0 240.0 4,000.0 2,000.0 2,000.0 2,310 .0 30.0 2,360.0 5,340.0 45.0 1,200.0 95.0 4,000.0 1,409.0 864.0 545.0 1,630.0 70.0 1,280.0 280.0 382.0 76.0 306.0 16 SR 18 a bound/6th St. SE to Auburn Way South including grade separation at BNSF yard Estimated Project Cost: 30,000.0 Cost 4,000.0 4,000. Rev - Other 4,000.0 4,000. E City of Auburn a Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES' 17 'D' Street NW - 37th NW to 44th NW Estimated Project Cost: 2,170.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant 18 A Street Loop Estimated Project Cost: 455.0 Cost 405.0 Rev - City 122.5 Rev - Grant 282.5 19 SR164 Bypass Estimated Project Cost: 22,330.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Other Rev - Grant 170.0 170.0 34.0 34.0 136.0 136.0 405.0 122.5 282.5 2,600.0 1,000.0 750.0 1,500.0 2,300.0 8,150.0 0.0 520.0 200.0 150.0 300.0 460.0 1,630.0 2,080.0 800.0 600.0 1,200.0 1,840.0 6,520.0 20 Citywide ITS Project Estimated Project Cost: 2,055.0 Cost 300.0 1,700.0 2,000.0 Rev - Grant 1,700.0 1,700.0 Rev - Other 300.0 300.0 21 AWS (SR164) Dogwood St SE to MIT Amp. Estimated Project Cost: 35,070.0 Cost 1,750.0 3,000.0 3,000.0 9,320.0 10,000.0 27,070.0 Rev - Grant 1,400.0 2,400.0 2,400.0 7,456.0 8,000.0 21,656.0 Rev - Other 350.0 600.0 600.0 1,864.0 2,000.0 5,414.0 22 SR 167 Widening - SR 405 to Pierce Ct Line, State Project, RTID Project Estimated Project Cost: 1,300,000.0 Cost 30,000.0 30,000.0 30,000.0 50,000.0 140,000.0 Rev - City 0.0 Rev - Grant 24,000.0 24,000.0 24,000.0 40,000.0 112,000.0 Rev - Other 6,000.0 6,000.0 6,000.0 10,000.0 28,000.0 23 3rd Street Grade Separation Estimated Project Cost: 34,772.0 Cost 10.0 10.0 Rev - Grant 10.0 10.0 24 South 277th Grade Separation Estimated Project Cost: 13,688.0 Cost 40.0 40.0 Rev - City 40.0 40.0 Subtotal 4,151.0 12,285.0 37,213.0 40,666.0 49,315.0 80,159.0 223,789.0 K11 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVE-NUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 NON -CAPACITY PROJECTS: 25 Lea Hill Slide Slope/105th Street Repair Estimated Project Cost: 175.0 Cost 120.0 Rev - City 120.0 26 S277th - AWN to Frontage Rd. Wetland Mitigation Estimated Project Cost: 55.0 Cost 25.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Rev - City 25.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 27 West Valley Highway Peasley Canyon Rd. to 15th Street SW connects two State routes Estimated Project Cost: 1,605.0 Cost 529.0 Rev - City Rev - Grant 385.0 Rev - Other 144.0 28 Downtown Lighting Program Estimated Project Cost: 160.0 Cost Rev - City 29 B St. NW Wetland Mitigation Estimated Project Cost: 6.0 Cost 4.0 Rev - City 4.0 30 Kersey Way - Oravetz Rd. Signal Estimated Project Cost: 202.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant 31 Crossing Gate UPRR and West Main Street Estimated Project Cost: 250.0 Cost 245.0 Rev - Grant 245.0 32 Transportation Plan Update Estimated Project Cost: 169.0 Cost 32.0 Rev - City 32.0 10.0 10.0 174.0 14.0 160.0 33 'M' Street SE - 37th SE to 29th SE (Class If bike lane cost is $180,000) Estimated Project Cost: 1,880.0 Cost 10.0 Rev - City 10.0 Rev - Grant Rev - Other 21 120.0 120.0 6.0 55.0 6.0 55.0 529.0 0.0 385.0 144.0 200.0 500.0 200.0 500.0 10.0 10.0 4.01 4.0 174.0 14.0 160.0 245.0 245.0 32.0 32.0 710.0 10.0 0.0 700.0 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plait Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 34 BNSF/East Valley Hwy Pedestrian Undercrossing Estimated Project Cost: 3,640.0 Cost 140.0 150.0 Rev - City 0.0 30.0 Rev - Grant 113.0 120.0 Rev - King Co. Open Space Bd 27.0 41 Right of Way Acquisition/Grant Administration 35 A Street SE Pedestrian Improvement Estimated Project Cost: 138.0 Cost Cost 500.0 Rev - City 250.0 Rev - Grant 250.0 2007 2008 TC 300.0 3,000.0 3,590.0 60.0 600.0 690.0 240.0 2,400.0 2,873.0 27.0 138.0 28.0 110.0 138.0 28.0 110.0 36 Citywide Sidewalk Improvement Projects Estimated Project Cost: 2,000.0 Cost 100.0 350.0 350.0 350.0 350.0 350.0 1,850.0 Rev - City 100.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 450.0 Rev - Other 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 1,400.0 37 Pavement Preservation Arterial Estimated Project Cost: 1,406.0 Cost 200.0 200.0 200.0 Estimated Project Cost: 2,900.0 Rev - City 200.0 200.0 200.0 600.0 41 Right of Way Acquisition/Grant Administration Estimated Project Cost: 300.0 Cost 400.0 500.0 500.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 2,150.0 Rev - City 400.0 500.0 500.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 2,150.0 38 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program Estimated Project Cost: 150.0 Cost 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 150.0 Rev - City 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 150.0 39 Street Asset Management Program Estimated Project Cost: 150.0 Cost 50.0 50.0 Rev - City 50.0 50.0 40 Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastucture Improvements Estimated Project Cost: 1,406.0 Cost 200.0 200.0 200.0 600.0 Rev - City 200.0 200.0 200.0 600.0 41 Right of Way Acquisition/Grant Administration Estimated Project Cost: 300.0 Cost 50.0 50.0 100.0 Rev - City 50.0 50.0 100.0 Non -Motorized Projects 42 Auburn Black Diamond Rd (Class 1 or 2) -1st SE to ECL Estimated Project Cost: 75.0 Cost 75.0 75.0 Rev - City 75.0 75.0 22 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 ` 2005 2006 43 White River Trail head (Class 1) Roegner Park to East Valley Hwy Estimated Project Cost: 360.0 Cost 360.0 Rev - City 72.0 Rev - Grant 288.0 44 37th St. SE/ R St. SE Connector (Class 1) - from Pike to R St. SE Estimated Project Cost: 125.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant , Rev - Other )7 2008 2009 25.0 100.0 20.0 80.0 5.0 20.0 45 Green River Trail, Phase 1 (Class 1 Trail) - Design work, from Green River Access to Brannan Park Estimated Project Cost: 620.0 Cost 125.0 495.0 Rev - City Rev - Grant 100.0 395.0 Rev - Other 25.0 100.0 46 West Main St. Ped./Bike Improvements (Class 2) - Interurban Trail to Transit Center Estimated Project Cost: 1,720.0 Cost 26.0 84.0 190.0 1,420.0 Rev - City 4.0 Rev - Grant 22.0 63.0 150.0 1,130.0 Rev - Other 21.0 40.0 290.0 47 Green River Trail Phase 2 (Class 1) Brannan Park to 2nd St. SE Estimated Project Cost: 730.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant Rev - Other 48 Green River Trail Phase 3 (Class 1) 2nd St. SE to SR 18 Estimated Project Cost: 725.0 Cost Rev - City Rev - Grant Rev - Other 49 Kersey Way Trail Estimated Project Cost: 75.0 Cost Rev - Other 23 360.0 72.0 288.0 125.0 0.0 100.0 25.0 620.0 0.0 495.0 125.0 1,720.0 4.0 1,365.0 351.0 150.0 150.0 0.0 120.0 120.0 30.0 30.0 150.0 150.0 0.0 120.0 120.0 30.0 30.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL 50 C St SW (3rd St SW to 15th St SW Estimated Project Cost: 75.0 Cost 75.0 75.0 Rev - Other 75.0 75.0 51 A St SE along BNSF Estimated Project Cost: 190.0 Cost 190.0 190.0 Rev - Other 190.0 190.0 Subtotal 1,931.0 1,979.0 1,754.0 5,436.0 1,421.0 1,526.0 14,047.0 SUMMARY: COSTS AND REVENUES COSTS: Capacity Projects 4,151.0 12,285.0 37,213.0 40,666.0 49,315.0 80,159.0 223,789.0 Non -Capacity Projects 1,931.0 1,979.0 1,754.0 5,436.0 1,421.0 1,526.0 14,047.0 Total Costs 6,082.0 14,264.0 38,967.0 46,102.0 50,736.0 81,685.0 237,836.0 EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - City 2,579.5 1,413.0 1,029.0 1,182.0 1,205.0 1,129.0 8,537.5 Rev - KC Open Space Bond 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 Subtotal 2,606.5 1,413.0 1,029.0 1,182.0 1,205.0 1,129.0 8,564.5 NEW REVENUES: Rev - Developer 0.0 2,640.0 800.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,440.0 Rev - Other * 474.0 1,185.0 7,180.0 11,670.0 9,264.0 17,913.0 47,686.0 Rev - Grants 2,785.5 8,781.0 29,908.0 32,966.0 40,067.0 62,243.0 176,750.5 Rev - Impact Fees 216.0 245.0 50.0 284.0 200.0 400.0 1,395.0 Subtotal 3,475.5 12,851.0 37,938.0 44,920.0 49,531.0 80,556.0 229,271.5 * Mitigation agreements, Other agencies Total Revenue 6,082.0 14,264.0 38,967.0 46,102.0 50,736.0 81,685.0 237,836.0 BALANCE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 CFP` PROJECTS AND FINANCING PLAN (All Projects Are Times $1,000) WATER' COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Capacity Projects: 1 Well 5B (S-114) Expansion - Construct a new well house facility to allow reduncy in the Lakeland Hills area, as described in the 2000 Water Comp Plan DRAFT (WS -115) Cost 100.0 500.0 600.0 Rev -City 100.0 500.0 600.0 2 Second Supply Pipeline Emergency Intertie (WS -119) Expansion - Construct two new emergency intertie stations. Design is expected in 2005 and construction in 2006. Cost 100.0 100.0 Rev - City 100.0 100.0 3 Pipeline Expansions(City Projects Concurrent with Road Projects) Expansion - Cities contribution in Capital Expansions Projects proposed with Developers. DS -116-809 Cross Street Pipeline Construction Cost 136.0 136.0 Rev - City 136.0 136.0 DS -642-1010,1110 R Street SE Parallel Pipeline Construction Cost 56.0 287.0 343.0 Rev - City 56.0 287.0 343.0 DS -632-709 Auburn Way North Pipeline Construction Cost 27.0 131.0 158.0 Rev - City 27.0 131.0 158.0 4 New Storage Reservoir (Lakeland Hills Area) Expansion - Construction of a new total capacity of 2.65 million gallon reservoir in the Lakeland Hills area (SR -201 1509). This project is planned with SR -107 Cost 180.0 180.0 Rev - Algona 180.0 180.0 Sub -Total 336.0 527.0 367.0 287.0 0.0 0.0 1,517.0 Non -Capacity Projects: 5 Pipeline Replacement Program Improvement - Identify areas in the city where pipeline projects are require to improve the overall water system grid. Cost 500.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 Rev -City 500.0 500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 25 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTA 6 Wellhead Protection Program Improvement - Identify potential hazards to high quality water supply from the City wells as required by DOH and the SDWA, as described in chapter 7 of the 2000 Water Comp Plan DRAFT (WQ-107) Cost 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 Rev - City 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 7 Control System Reprogramming SCADA Upgrades Improvements - Reprogram the existing control system to utilize equalizing storage capabilities of system. Cost 50.0 50.0 Rev - City 50.0 50.0 8 Reservoir Protective Coating(Lea Hill, Academy & Lakeland Hills) Renewal/Replacement - Repaint Reservoirs, described in 2000 Comp Plan Draft as SR -102 through SR -105 Cost 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Rev-PWTF 15.0 0.0 15.0 Pipeline Improvements(Franchise Requirements, Loop Closures, Concurrent with Road Projects) Improvements - Water Distribution Improvement/Replacement Projects, described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT as DS-## & PR-##. DS -643-1010 M Street SE Pipeline Replacement Cost 39.4 328.6 368.0 Rev - City 39.4 328.6 368.0 DS -6441109,1110 25th Street SE Parallel Pipeline Construction Cost 46.0 382.0 428.0 Rev - City 46.0 382.0 428.0 DS -6641010 R Street SE Pipeline Replacement Cost 153.0 0.0 153.0 Rev - City 153.0 0.0 153.0 DS -665-1009,1010 22nd Street SE Pipeline Replacement Cost 51.1 348.9 400.0 Rev - City 51.1 348.9 400.0 DS -631-709 E Street NE Pipeline Replacement Cost 5.0 22.5 27.5 Rev - City 5.0 22.5 27.5 10 Annual Pipeline Replacements (PR -201) Replacements - Replacement of unforeseen existing pipelines which are experiencing excessive leakage or are undersized. Cost 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 Rev - City 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 400.0 11 Pipeline Replacements Projects Renewal/Replacement and Water Distribution Improvement Projects, described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT as PR-## and DS-##. PR -108-311 Hydrant 1155 Relocation Cost 10.0 0.0 10.0 Rev - City 10.0 0.0 10.0 26 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL 12 Lakeland Hills Service Area Rezone (PZ -103) Improvement - Rezoning the Lakeland Hills Service Area, as described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT. Cost 670.0 0.0 670.0 Rev - City 670.0 0.0 670.0 13 Academy Service Area Rezone (PZ -101) Improvement - Rezoning the Academy Service Area, as described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT. Cost 126.0 126.0 Rev - City 126.0 126.0 14 Comprehensive Planning Update the Water Comp Plan in 2006 as required by Washington DOH, described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT as OP -102. and OP -104 Cost 50.0 100.0 150.0 Rev - City 50.0 100.0 150.0 15 Water Supply Spring and Well Improvements Improvement - Increase supply and redundancy, described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT. S-112 and S-113 Cost 0.0 20.0 20.0 Rev - City 0.0 20.0 20.0 16 Lea Hill Booster Pump Station Upgrade Improvement - Upgrade with New Lea Hill Booster Pump Station for increased demand to the service area and increased supply redundancy, described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT as PB -107. supply redundancy, described in2000 Comp Plan DRAFT as BP -107. Cost 100.0 1,000.0 0.0 1,100.0 Rev - City 100.0 100.0 0.0 200.0 Rev - PWTF 900.0 900.0 17 Lea Hill Service Area Rezone (PZ -102) Improvement - Rezoning the Lea Hill Sevice Area, as described in 2000 Comp Plan DRAFT. Cost 102.0 102.0 Rev - City 102.0 102.0 18 Coal Creek Springs Hatches Improvement - Upgrade existing vaults and valves. Cost 75.0 75.0 Rev -City 75.0 75.0 19 Vulnerability Assessment Improvements Improvement - Based on Vulnerability Study, Cost 50.0 50.0 Rev -City 50.0 50.0 20 Well 5 System Improvements Improvement - Provide a pump saver and possible manual transfer switch. Cost 75.0 75.0 Rev -City 75.0 75.0 Subtotal 1,460.5 1,729.5 755.0 1,324.5 100.0 0.0 5,369.5 27 City of Auburn Addendum to 2003 - 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Updated Project List for Period 2004 - 2009 COSTS/REVENUES 2004 2 05 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Summary: Costs and Revenues COSTS: Capacity Projects Non -Capacity Projects Total Costs EXISTING REVENUES: Rev - City Rev - Algona Public Works Trust Fund Total Revenue BALANCE 336.0 527.0 367.0 287.0 0.0 0.0 1,517.0 1,460.5 1,729.5 755.0 1,324.5 100.0 0.0 5,369.5 1,796.5 2,256.5 1,122.0 1,611.5 100.0 0.0 6,886.5 1,781.5 2,256.5 942.0 711.5 100.0 0.0 5,791.5 0.0 0.0 180.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 180.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 900.0 0.0 0.0 915.0 1,796.5 2,256.5 1,122.0 1,611.5 100.0 0.0 6,886.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28