HomeMy WebLinkAbout6027Return Address:
Auburn City Clerk 20060928002406
City of Auburn
25 West Main St. PACiFic Nw TIT oRO az.00
PAGE001 OF 011
Auburn, WA 98001 KINGBCOUNTY16WA3
RECORDER'S COVER SHEET
Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): ~ '
~~
1. Rezone (Ordinance 6027) ~ ~'v1 0~, -- ~sc~'"'~
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:
^Additional reference #'s on page _ of document
Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials)
1. Auburn, City of
Grantee: (Last name first) goyddoc+~g~'~ ~«s
1. Campbell, Patricia t~db9lP~'~~ ~rot1~n
2. Spencer, Marylyn aoa-m"~'0dat`0r1OO~~r~c«
3. Jones, Stephena~,~~t~cte..
Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range)
That portion of the SW Quarter of the SW Quarter of Section 9,Township 21 North, Range 5 East
® Additional legal is on page 11 of the document.
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number:
0921059095,0921059065
^ Assessor Tax # not
ORDINANCE NO. 6027
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONING
FOR CARY LANG CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF PATRICIA
CAMPBELL, MARYLL YN SPENCER, AND STEPHEN JONES
FROM LHR1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LHR2 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received an application for a change in
zoning from the existing LHR1 Single Family Residential Zone (tax parcels
0921059095 and 0921059065) to LHR2 Single Family Residential for properties
commonly known as 31720 116th Ave SE and 31808 116th Ave SE (City File
No. REZ06-001); and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2006, the Hearing Examiner conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the matter and on May 3, 2006, issued a decision
recommending the City Council approve the rezone, with no conditions; and
WHEREAS, final approval is appropriate for City Council action; and
WHEREAS, based on the review given this rezone application by the
Hearing Examiner, the City Council hereby makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Applicant requests a rezone of two parcels of land, totaling
approximately 5.41 acres, from Single-Family Residential (LHR-1) to Single-
Family Residential (LHR-2). The subject property is comprised of two
contiguous parcels located at 31808 - 116th Avenue SE and 31720 - 116th
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 1
Avenue SE in Auburn, Washington.1 Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Pages 1-2; Exhibit
2, Vicinity Map; Exhibit 3, Rezone Application.
2. The parcel located at 31808 - 116th Avenue SE is 2.46 acres in size. A
single family residence is located on the site. The parcel located at 31720 -
116th Avenue SE is 2.95 acres in size. A church and associated buildings are
located on the site. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Page 2; Exhibit 3, Rezone
Application.
3. The rezone is not requested in conjunction with an application for
development of the site although the Applicant is seeking to change the zoning
to facilitate future residential development that would be consistent with the
surrounding neighborhoods. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Page 2; Exhibit 3, Rezone
Application; Testimony of Borland.
4. The subject property is located within the Lea Hill (LH) Area, which was
recently annexed to the City. As provided in ACC 18.02.050, properties lying
within the LH area and not zoned by the City prior to annexation were given the
LHR-1 zoning designation upon annexation. Prior to annexation, the King
County zoning designation for the subject property was R-6 (Residential 6
dwelling units per acre). Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Pages 1 and 4; ACC 18.02.050;
Exhibit 10, Lea Hill Principles of Annexation; Testimony of Borland.
5. Land use regulations for the LH Area are found in Auburn City Code
(ACC) Chapter 18.45. The uses permitted in LH zones are stated by
reference to specific provisions of the ACC. Permitted uses and development
standards within the LHR-1 zone are provided for in ACC 18.12. Permitted
uses and development standards within the LHR-2 zone are provided for in
ACC 18.14.
6, Both the LHR-1 and LHR-2 single-family residential zones are intended
to create a living environment of optimum standards for single-family dwellings
with development limited to a relatively low degree of density and both permit
1 The site is comprised of two contiguous tax parcels under separate ownerships. The property located at
31808 - 116th Avenue SE is owned by W.J. Spencer and is referred to as King County Tax Parcel
#0921059065. The property located at 31720 - 116th Avenue SE is owned by the Community of Christ
and is referred to as King County Tax Parcel# 0921059095.
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 2
single family detached dwellings outright.
18.14.010, .020.
ACC 18.12.010, .020; ACC
&. The LHR-1 zone requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. the
LHR-2 zone requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. Under the
existing LHR-1 zoning designation, the subject property could be developed
with approximately 29 residential lots, or five dwelling units per acre (du/acre).
Under the proposed LHR-2 zoning designation, the subject property could be
developed with approximately 39 residential lots, or seven du/acre. ACC
18. 12.040(A); ACC 18. 14.040(A).
8. Surrounding land is primarily located within unincorporated King County.
Properties to the south and east are zoned R-6 Residential (6 du/acre).
Property to the north is zoned R-4 Residential (4 du/acre). Properties to the
west, located within the City, are zoned LHR-2. Single family residential
development is located on all surrounding properties. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,
Page 2.
9. The Lea Hill Task Force Principles for Annexation (Exhibit 10), adopted
in December 15, 1997, identified land uses issues of concern to area residents.
The report addressed appropriate future zoning designations for properties
within the Lea Hill area, including a zoning designation of LHR-2 for the subject
property. The report has been adopted as part of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Page 3.
10. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan is based on 22 goals; and
several objectives and policies to support hoses goals that were developed as a
result of and in response to a wide range of issues identified during the Plan's
public involvement process. The City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan land use
designation of the subject property is "Single Family Residential." The purpose
of the Single Family Residential designation is to designate and protect areas
for predominantly single-family dwellings. Several goals and policies of the
Auburn Comprehensive Plan are particularly applicable to the requested
rezone. Housing Goal 7, Residential Development, encourages the
development of new singe-family detached housing as a priority in maintaining
the community character of the City. Housing Goal 8, Neighborhood Quality,
seeks to conserve the livability of viable residential areas. Policy LU-14
encourages urban densities in the majority of the single-family residentially
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 3
zoned areas within the City. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Pages 1, 3; City of Auburn
Comprehensive Plan, Housing and Land Use Element.
11. The smaller lot sizes allowed by the requested LHR2 zoning designation
would be consistent with the City's overall housing development strategy, as
established in Chapter 4, the Housing Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The City's overall housing development strategy envisions a socially and
economically integrated community with diversity in its housing stock that
accommodates all income groups. Residential and community development in
the City will promote and sustain an amenable quality of life for a family-
oriented community. Auburn Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4 - Housing.
12. Pursuant to Washington's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW
43.21 C, the City of Auburn acted as lead agency for the identification and
review of environmental impacts caused by the proposed rezone. The City
issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on March 27, 2006. A copy
of the DNS was not submitted into the record. There have been no appeals of
this determination. Exhibit 1, page 3; Testimony of Borland.
13. Notice of the rezone application was provided to the Washington State
Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development and other state
agencies on March 2, 2006. No comments have been received from any state
agency. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, Page 3; Testimony of Borland..
14. Notice of the open record hearing was mailed to properties within 300
feet of the site and posted on the subject property on April 10, 2006. Notice of
the open record public hearing was published in King County Journal on April 7,
2006. Exhibits 5, 6, 7, 8, and 8a. There was no public comment on the rezone
application. Testimony of Borland.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
For a rezone application to be approved, the Applicant must show the following:
1. The rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. The rezone was initiated by someone other than the City; and
3. Changes or modifications to the rezone by the Hearing
Examiner or City Council will not result in a more intense zone
than the one requested.
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 4
A CC 18.68.030 and 18.68.050.
In addition to the criteria set forth in the Auburn City Code, the rezone
application must be consistent with state law. In the decision Parkridge v.
Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454 (1978), the Washington Supreme Court identified the
following general criteria for rezone approval:
1. There is no presumption of validity favoring the action or rezoning;
2. The proponents of the rezone have the burden of proof in
demonstrating that conditions have changed since the original
zoning;
3. The rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, morals, or welfare.
In more recent decisions the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals have
identified an exception to the second Parkridge criterion that is relevant to this
case. In Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wash. App. 840, 846 (1995), the court
held that "where the proposed rezone ... implements policies of the
comprehensive plan, changed circumstances are not required." The court
adopted the rationale from the earlier decision Save Our Rural Environment v.
Snohomish County that:
If such implementation were not allowed to occur until physical or
developmental circumstances in the area had changed, the new
comprehensive plan might never be fulfilled: if an area is presently
undeveloped and newly amended comprehensive plan calls for
industrial development, no industrial development may occur until
alleast one rezone has been granted.
Bjarnson, 78 Wash. App. at 846 (quoting Save Our Rural Environment v.
Snohomish County, 99 Wash.2d 363, 370 (1983)). Because the City of Auburn
criteria for rezone approval require that the rezone be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, no analysis of changed circumstances is required.
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 5
Conclusions Based on Findings
1. The proposed rezone would be consistent with the City of Auburn
Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designation of the subject
property is Single Family Residential. The requested LHR-2 zoning would
implement this designation and provides justification for an assertion of
"changed circumstances." The higher densities permitted in the LHR-2
district would be consistent with the City's overall housing strategy, assisting
in meeting the needs of the forecasted population growth. Findings of Fact
Nos. 7,9, 10, and 11; Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wash. App. 840 (1995)
2. The City of Auburn did not initiate the proposed rezone. The property
owners initiated the proposed rezone of the subject property. Finding of
Fact NO.1 and 2.
3. No modification of the proposed rezone is required. The requested LHR-
2 zoning would be compatible with the residential zoning of surrounding
properties and the Comprehensive Plan. Neither the City Staff nor the
Hearing Examiner is recommending any modifications to the proposed
rezone that would intensive the proposal. Findings of Fact No.7, 8, 9, 10,
and 11.
4. The proposed rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, morals, or welfare of the community. The subject
property is in an area characterized by residential development. The
proposed rezone would allow future residential development consistent with
existing land uses in the vicinity and with the land use designation for the
site. The contemplated density housing would be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Environmental review was
conducted pursuant to SEPA and a DNS was issued. Site specific
development conditions would be addressed during site plan review of the
residential development to ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare
is not adverse impacted. Findings of Fact Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12;
Parkridge v. Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454 (1978).
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11 , 2006
Page 6
NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Approval. The request to rezone tax parcels (0921059095
and 0921059065) from Single Family Residential (LHR1) to Single Family
Residential (LHR2) is APPROVED, with no conditions. The properties are
identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Constitutionality or Invalidity. If any section, subsection
clause or phase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional such invalidity unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, as it is being
hereby expressly declared that this Ordinance and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed
adopted and approved and ratified irrespective of the fact that nay one or more
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phase be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 3. Recording. Upon the passage, approval and publication of
this Ordinance as provided by law, the City Clerk of the City of Auburn shall
cause this Ordinance to be recorded in the office of the King County Auditor.
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 7
Section 4. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out
the directives of this legislation.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication, as
provided by law.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
~f?
PETER B. EWIS
MAYOR
MJf#Y 11112g~f6
MAY 1 1 2DD6
--
~
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 8
ATTEST:
&~~S~~
City Clerk
!~ 'rvt~ /~( Z(/O~
Ordinance No. 6027
May 11, 2006
Page 9
G X Iff bJ r A
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 201.5
FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9,
SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF THE
PLAT OF WINDSOR PLACE AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 159 OF
PLATS AT PAGES 15 THROUGH 17, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9 AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9 TO THE NORTH LINE
OF THE SOUTH 97 FEET OF THE NORTH 4 ACRES OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH
97 FEET OF THE NORTH 4 ACRES OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 9 TO THE EAST MARGIN OF 116TH AVENUE
SOUTHEAST AND THE EAST LINE OF THE LANDS ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF AUBURN IN ANNEXATION ORDINANCE 5346;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST
MARGIN TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 201.5 FEET OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 201.5
FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9 TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.