The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6064 ORDINANCE NO.6 0 6 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on August 18, 1986 adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995 the City of Auburn adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on September 5, 1995 reaffirmed that action by Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments were processed by the Planning, Building, and Community Department as proposed Year 2006 amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the Year 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Office of Community Development and other State agenCies for the 60 day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance No. 6064 November 15, 2006 Page 1 WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on September 6, 2005, October 3, 2005, and October 24, 2006 conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Auburn City Planning Commission heard public testimony and took evidence and exhibits into consideration; and WHEREAS, thereafter the Auburn City Planning Commission made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2006 Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2006 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations and made a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2006, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, several amendments are for city owned properties changing to a Public and Quasi-Public or Open Space land use designation; and WHEREAS, in 2005 the City of Auburn brought together a focus group of diverse business and community interests that identified several economic development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is reflected in an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strategies and actions Ordinance No. 6064 November 15, 2006 Page 2 needed to affect necessary change for specific strategy areas within the City as adopted by Resolution No. 3944 by the City Council. Implementation of these strategies is intended to enable the City to achieve the City's economic development potential. Implementation of actions and strategies in the Economic Development Strategies is appropriate and reflected. in various proposed amendments to various chapters; and WHEREAS, the North End Strategy Area calls for enhancing Emerald Downs Drive with commercial and industrial uses such as restaurants to capitalize on daytime volumes, and the I Street Corridor strategy also calls for enhancing the daytime population with commercial uses such as lunch cafes; and WHEREAS, the 15th Street SW and C Street SW strategy areas calls for designating both sides of 15th Street SW as commercial and focus on the C Street SW and 8th Street SW vicinity as a redevelopment area with productive uses; and WHEREAS, the A Street SE Corridor Strategy area calls for enhancing the economic vitality of A Street SE by recognizing A Street SE is a high volume traffic corridor and additional traffic should not be used as a rationale to preclude development, and the logistics of implementation calls for the change of industrial properties to commercial while protecting the area's interior. residential neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the AEP Green Zone Strategy area calls for preparation of a second phase to take more densely developed but underutilized areas adjacent to AEP Greenbelt Strategy Area; and Ordinance No. 6064 November 15,2006 Page 3 WHEREAS, on June 19, 2006 the City of Auburn City Council adopted Resolution No. 4049, Vision 2016, which outlines numerous goals of the City Council to accomplish over the next ten years; and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound region has seen an increasing trend toward the commercialization of industrially zoned areas to respond to changing needs of the public. Renton, Kent, Tukwila and Federal Way are just a few of the areas that have seen the demand for commercial uses lead to rezoning of industrial land. This trend has become increasingly pronounced in the south King County area. Certain proposed amendments respond to this trend by amending industrially designated properties to commercial, especially along major city transportation corridors; and WHEREAS, in the coming years, pressure will be escalating to rezone industrial land and encourage commercial mixed-use development, and changing comprehensive plan land use designations to commercial for the proposed areas prepares Auburn for this trend by planning for the next ten to twenty years; and WHEREAS, the City is endeavoring to anticipate such changes, rather than reacting to market trends; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn does not have a designated manufacturing/industrial center per the King County Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 4092 to extend the six month moratorium for industrial zoned lands located west of C Street NW, east of H Street NW, and south of 4th Street NW; and Ordinance No. 6064 November 15, 2006 Page 4 WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 4067 to establish a six month moratorium for industrial zoned lands located along the east side of A Street SE from SR 18 to the southern city limits. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: Section 1. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments and Map Amendments are herewith adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and it is herewith directed that they be filed along with this Ordinance with the Auburn City Clerk and be available for public inspection. Section 2. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986 by Resolution No. 1703 and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995. Section 3. The Comprehensive Plan and amendments are herewith designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 6064 November 15, 2006 Page 5 Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. . Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: NQtP.~ I ~o~g06 NOV ~ 0 2006 --~ ATTEST: J~ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk Published: \ \ - -z..G:, - z..m~ Ordinance No. 6064 November 15, 2006 Page 6 • • • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 1, 2, & 3 = EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL =PROPOSED AREA CHANGE= HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC • 0 4 2006 PROPOSED AL1 BURN COMPREHENSIVE r"`N erAr ro 0: 12 r a1 PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 4 wWWN61'ON Q CITY LIMITS MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ® EXISTING LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. PUBLIC AM) QUASI-PUBLIC ® PROPOSED AREA CHANGE LIGHT COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE 2006 PROPOSED i rvai ep:??aszo5 recr COMPREHENSIVE AuBuRN MAP.or ,.., PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 5 bYASHINCJTON rRINTF.P nx 117.7vZoA ® EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE-F.AiNHLY RESIDENTIAI, PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC =PROPOSED AREA CHANCE =HIGH DI'NSI'll KP:SIDFIN'91?'vQ. OPFIN SM(T 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE AUBURN rnn-ren un 11.1.1D, PLAN AMENDMENT AREA b VV' _'"i ,t T° 0 EXISTING LAND USE LIGHT COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE / PROPOSED AREA CHANGE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC • • 0 2006 PROPOSED Cli01 , COMPREHENSIVE ALjBuRN PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 7 tiv.`sH i ?c TON w EXISTING LAND USE - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE PROPOSED AREA CHANGE PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC 0 • • 2006 PROPOSED " k JB[? COMPREHENSIVE ,t V.111.1 . 11 1 1 PLAN AMENDMENT AREA $ INIVI Iii l!t. EXISTING LAND USE =LIGHT INDUSTRIAL =PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC PROPOSED AREA CHANGE = HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE • • 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE A0BURN MAP,,, =< PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 9 f"N(, W fl(NT EU I-N ,: 1 1 ' 11:1 CITY LIMITS =PROPOSED AREA CHANGE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 EXISTING LAND USE M HEAVY COMMERCIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC PROPOSED -i I T' tt y{ 9 ! 4 2006 PROPOSED ? * . I I Y U1 f. R „n lAtiBuk'N COMPREHENSIVE ,211.1 PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 10 ^n?f-ii?c-r???? ?IITIO 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE AuBuRN 111 1 PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 11 WASHINGTON EXISTING LAND USE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC / PROPOSED AREA CHANGE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE 2006 PROPOSED CITY 01 COMPREHENSIVE + AuBuftN . ,F ' V?:1SH{NCTON ""ll '` r PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 12 «NTEL' r, 17 -1111', ® CITY LIMITS EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a ; ?; PAA PROPOSED LAND USE = PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC • • 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE A,I Ilia/II L` IFl PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 13 I LII,WASH iNC TON I ? - -- _ I - i v i I a --------. r r a i ; Q CITY LIMITS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL EXISTING LAND USE ® DO«'NTOWN PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC PROPOSED LAND USE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 • • . k 2006 PROPOSED CITY (Y COMPREHENSIVE A,'OBUftN WASH 1NGTC)N PLAN ANI ENDMENT AREA 14 • • . 0 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE CITY„ ADBuRN PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 15 WASHINGTON QCITYI,INIrrs SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL LIGHTINDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE 0 EXISTING LAND USE LIGHT COMMERCIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED LAND USE HEAVY COMMERCIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC • • 0 2006 PROPOSED„, COMPREHENSIVE A 411i 4L PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 16 WASH INCTON r-ICITYLIDIITS SINGLE-EAMILYRESIDENTIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL = HEAVY INDUSTRIAL Q EXISTING LLYD USE MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. M HEAVY COPI)IERCI.AL = PUBLIC: AND QUASI-PUBLIC = PROPOSED LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL = LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE 2006 PROPOSED ciTN OF y * ; } COMPREHENSIVE Ali B V R" M-ke Dt.131, PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 17 - WASHINGTON PRY-EDON: IB.D°M 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE If. II II IT \IlililFF, All IJBUR .V PLAN AXIENDMENT AREA 21 WASNINC!ION Q C1TY' LIMIITS MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I HEAVY COMMERCIAL M PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC EXISTING LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ® DOWN- OWN ?? OPEN SPACE PROPOSED LAND USE OFFICE RESIDENTIAI. LIGHT INDUSTRLAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIALLIGHT COMMERCIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL • 100 2006 PROPOSED sir} cif COMPREHENSIVE Ai'muk-N PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 22 WASH INCTON PY NIy:GiIN Q Cl'C]' LIMITS % MODERATE DENSITY RE.SIDE.NTIAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL M PUBLiC.AND QUASI-PI: BLIC EXISTING LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ® DOWN'TOR'N OPEN SPACE © PROPOSED LAND USE OFFICE REStDENTL]L ® LIGHT INDiSTRIAL SINGLE-F.AMILY'RESIDENTLIL _s_ LIGHT COMMERCIAL HEAVYINDi:STR1AL • • • 2006 PROPOSED , COMPREHENSIVE AijBuk, N PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 23 WASHINGTON Q CITY LIMITS ;r MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC EXISTING LAND USE - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ® DOWNTOWN OPEN SPACE. © PROPOSED LAND USE OFFICE RESIDENTIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL ? HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 2006 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE A013URN «<, Pk IVI LU v V utlt:._!NPLAN AMENDMENT AREA 24 64ASH ING 10N Q CITY LIA11'PS NIODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL = HEAVY CO-NMIERCLAL M PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC 0 EXISTING LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ® DOWNTOWN :•i,S',<;i;.. OPEN SPACE PROPOSED LAND USE OFFICE RESIDENTIAL ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SINGLF-FAITU Y RESIDENTIAL:LIGHT COMMERCIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R 2006 PROPOSED CITY OF ..N * . COMPREHENSIVE RN PLAN AMENDMENT AREA 25 WA SIT INC TON QCITY LIMITS % MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ? HEAVY COMMERCIAL _ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, =EXISTING LAND USE ? HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ® DOWNTOWN ? PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL =`" : LIGHT COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 PROPOSED LAND USE • Policy/Text Amendment #1 Auburn School District Updated 2006 to 2012 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Auburn School District Updated 2006 to 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors April 24, 2006). • • • • r 1 LJ AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 • Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors April 24, 2006 Auburn Mountainview High School Lakeland Hills Elementary School • AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Janice Nelson Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent AUBURN SCHOOL DI RICIr "Awenieie to Excellent • n U E • Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections ..................... Page 6 Section III Standard of Service ........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities ....................... Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity ................................ Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan ................. Page 20 Section VII Impact Fees .................................. Page 23 Section VIII Appendices ................................... Page 27 Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 28 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 42 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 45 0 0 1] Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 1. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2006. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 0 2005-06 capacity was 12,976 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this . same period was 13,386.64. The actual number of individual students was 14,088 as of October 1, 2005. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005. Also, the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a new middle school is needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is . with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. • Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2006 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the elementary level. B. Increase of 1 learning specialist classroom at elementary level C. Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level D. Increase of 1 structured learning classroom at elementary level Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Updated to include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in inventory, opening 2006. B. Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations. Section V Pupil Capacity A. Updated to include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in inventory, opening 2006. B. Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations. • 4 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2005 to 2006 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2005 CPF 2006 EXPLANATION Student Generation Facto rs Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3216 0.3010 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1584 0.1510 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1632 0.1660 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0687 0.0611 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0462 0.0317 Sr. High 0.0486 0.0452 School Construction Cos ts Elementary $15,600,000 $16,900,000 Updated project estimated costs. Facility Capacity Elementary 650 550 Change to 2005 Citizen Ad Hoc Recommendation Boeckh Index $129.81 $154.22 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beck) Match % - State 55.86% 55.71% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 44.14% 44.29% Computed District Average AV Single Family. $218,805 $237,281 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $55,264 $57,530 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.49 $2.39 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond 1nt Rate 4.63% 4.39% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-06) Section Vill Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2005 Appendix A.2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 0- 9 • 5 rl Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2005 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 KDG 955 966 984 1005 1030 1055 1072 1 963 1017 1037 1058 1085 1110 1129 2 963 979 1041 1063 1090 1115 1134 3 1002 986 1011 1076 1104 1130 1149 4 939 1017 1010 1038 1109 1136 1156 5 1065 959 1047 1043 1077 1148 1168 K-5 5887 5924 6130 6284 6495 6695 6807 6 1004 1086 989 1080 1082 1115 1178 7 1028 1032 1123 1030 1126 1127 1152 8 1137 1042 1056 1150 1062 1157 1150 6-8 3169 3160 3168 3259 3269 3398 3479 9 1379 1425 1346 1369 1477 1397 1489 10 1383 1310 1366 1286 1313 1415 1321 11 1182 1301 1236 1291 1213 1234 1324 12 1088 1092 1218 1153 1211 1129 1139 9-12 5032 5128 5165 5099 5214 5174 5273 TOTALS 14088 14212 14463 14642 14978 15268 15559 GRADES K-12 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5410 5441 5638 5781 5980 6168 6271 6-8 3169 3160 3168 3259 3269 3398 3479 9-12 5032 5128 5165 5099 5214 5174 5273 K-12 w/K 1/2 13611 13730 13971 14140 14463 14740 15023 7 A • 7 0 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE • The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service 0 in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPi guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,887 students in grades K through 5. The 905 of the 955 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5, plus 25 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,435. Four middle schools house 3,169 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,032 students in grades 9 through 12. The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPi space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. r, LJ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fifteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26.5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) r1 U 10 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students teaming English as a second language. This program requires-twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all twelve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) • • • 11 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities. One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program, for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. • Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/05 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) r1 12 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured learning center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires sixteen classrooms to provide for approximately 420 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the sixteen teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 0 • • 13 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE • ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/05 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,014) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,014) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,510) . Loss of Temporary Capacity Total Capacity Loss 0 (1,510) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,004) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,004) • 14 • 0 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES • E Table IV. I shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OPSI rated capacities. Table 1V.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities W.] @ OSPI Rate Capacity (November 2005) District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementa Schools Washington Elementary 492 5.40 20 E Street Northeast? Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 401 6.70 1101 D Street Southeas Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 10.50 1031 I4th Street Northeast, Auburn WA 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 485 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Re Elementary 531 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Al ac Elementary 494 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 595 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 578 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 585 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA,98092 ELEM CAPACITY 6,626 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 898 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 845 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior High Schools West Auburn Hi School 231 5.10 401 West Main Street Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior Hi 2-y2--37 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Aubum Mountainview HS 1,431 40.00 28900 124 Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,287 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,341 16 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY March 2006 Elementary Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 33 33 33 30 30 30 30 TOTAL CAPACITY 875 875 875 795 795 795 795 Middle School Location 2005-06 2006-07 .2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 Cascade 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 4 4 6 8 6 6 6_ TOTAL UNITS 9 9 13 18 18 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 270 390 540 540 540 540 Sr. High School Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 West Auburn 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 TOTAL CAPACITY 660 660 690 690 690 690 690 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 64 69 71 71 71 71 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,805 1,805 1,955 2025 , 2,025 2,025 2,025 • • 17 • 0 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table VA shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. ale VA Capacity WITH relocatables A. SPI Capacity A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS B. Capacity Adjustments C. Net Capacity D. ASD Enrollment E. ASD Surplus/Deficit 'ACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable Exclude SOS (pg 12 Total Adjustments >le V.2 Capacity WITH OUT relocatables A. SPI Capacity A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS B. Capacity Adjustments C. Net Capacity D. f ASD Enrollment 2005-06 2006-07 14,817 14,817 550 (2,093) (2,199; 12,724 13,168 14,088 14,212 (1,364) (1,045) 007-08 2008-09 15,367 15,917 550 (2,170) (2,099 13,747 13,818 14,463 14,642 (716) (824) 1,805 1,805 1,955 3,898 4,004 4,124 (2,093) (2,199) (2,170) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 14,8171 14,817 15,367 550 550 2,025 4,124' (2,099) 009-10 2010-11 2011-12 15,917 16,667 16,667 750 2,099 2,099 2,099' 14,568 14,568 14,568 14,978 15,268 15,559 (410) (700) (991) • 2,025 2,025 2,025 4,124 4,124 (4,124111 (2,099) (2,099) (2,099) 2008-09 2009-10 15,917 15,917 750 3,598 4,004 4,124 4,124 10,919 11,363 11,793 11,793 14,088 14,212 14,463 14,642 4,124 12,543 14,978 2010-11 2011-12 16,667 16,667 4,124 4,124 12,543 12,543 15,268 15,559 (2,725) (3,016) E. ISurplus/Delicit (3,169) (2,849) (2,670) (2,849) (2,435) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 12 3,898 4,004 4,124 4,124 4,124 Total Adjustments (3,898) (4,004) (4,124) (4,124) (4,124) 1/ New facilities shown in 2009-10 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 21 The Standard of Service represents 24.69% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 20.26% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non-lassroom spaces (commons, library, theater) 4,124 4,1 (4,124) (4,1, 19 • 0 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN • The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelinesfor Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71 % yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed resolution #1054 to • place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Elementary # 13 is under construction in the Lakeland area on a 12 acre site and 21 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2006. Elementary #14 is currently in bid process and construction is scheduled to begin in Spring of 2006 and to open in the Fall of 2007. The school will be constructed on a 10 acre site the district owns in the Lea Hill area. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study, and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modemize or replace facilities based upon criterion. The committee also recommended that the District have Middle School #5 on-line by Fall of 2009. The District is projecting 1470 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lea Hill areas. This increase in student population will require the construction of two new elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-one percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. • 1/ 1! 2005-12 Capital Construction Plan March 2006 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Cost Source Mar-06 65-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 All Facilities - 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX XX Modernization Ca Levy Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Band New Middle School Yes $5,000,000 Impact XX XX Fees Bond Elementary #13 Yes $16,900,000 Impact XX XX Fees const open Bond Elementary #14 Yes $18,600,000 Impact XX XX XX Fees plan const open Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX XX XX XX Ian const const o n Bond New Sr. High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX Fees open . 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds- The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level. 22 • • LJ • J o ?a O U N U W N N F L J ? ? o o • o 0 Q w U LL. tq J O `o E N a lL Q a o V N o 'r - n " CO x O y ? m a C C 0 2 t I_ p CO a O C r O `L m Q 0 c M . 3 = ? m co 3 > m . O L _ m 0 m c o 3 m c rs 0 U U A? E 3 0 x a m 3 m W :§ LU z to o UL 5 y 4m ° Qo o U) N E C C O • . Y m O :O Q J W LL E??Lo O IL ^ (D U;-, co .-n m 0 LL b 0 w U m O1 V N ? 6 - t 1? N .? 11 O O O C 0 C) C. 0 O 0 LL a , 0 _O s L - 00 c m 0 0 0 LL a m m M O t0D 3 m 0 0 0 CO CO 3§ co F00 3 o LL v Go co OD c N 001 001 001 E a o 0 0 0 LL o ~ X O U O O a m Lo Go XI I I v/ O O c O O a V= 0 U O O O c O O c p U of O cn a LL co C? co M to 0 69 V T _ E co N 0 O y LL Of iu ar Y L ? L E ?E CO U) m v= LL Fu uJ L O O LL O ^ O =00CIJC> O O O O C'i O ;; te r .- h N 0 !O O O O S O O O 7 co LL ? c m o cc o 0 o C m 0 0 0 LL 4) m C9 . t+) O 0 T m c o 0 0 cr '0 U ?- L o 0, ?i 0) _) 0) CO "r O. W c7 e7 L7 o E 0 0 0 CL mooOO H FE- ° F- X O V L LL 'V N O O 16 t+! Z ll N 3 x ? OO O U o co L C, v E °D LL W t Y L c E o in m v= LL wpm E L v 0 ;T CR LL (V -t -v = r, CD a m ? 6s ? t0 N I-- ,.r C) N O tv co co N M fA f9 ? ? N O O O O O O O O_ O ?; O 0 O O O co U L o 0 0 •C S X L ca 0 2 0 6 cm ca o°rno ° 4; co co o l0L x L N N N U) -0 ox c! N N x Ol 'O ' `V O c !O O !O x m vs u? in v c L O O m 0 L LL d) v N 0 • m U LL x x m H Z O co f E we o . 0 IL z} z N 94 U ? lY tq J x m (? o c io v oQ _ C C o L°o e cLi LL m m m c 0) 0) Uo a U) J 0 c v v vM m y ` N X C G m Q LL > ? X Y 7 Q ? ? C 7 D r- U, M co W a rO1i M m 3 D Co y o O x ? F N e» N us o O 6 m m U Z m E ? O Z m n U m n W 1 N LL 2 O O r_ M mv w c)i N mo > 0 .» m Q M I m La w n L x m W c LL LL w t w E n U LL LL ovovcon vo.r ? W n v, co co ao o ao •3 •E c N O V N N N va, C4 LL H N ~ kt t V rte.. Z 0'. M N amp w O 0) Lo 0 0 0 N M _N N ._- ?_ n O h m CO ? 0% ?O OD Lo U3 V co to m 60 h O a ;q O O U U -- c .U V .yam: co mU 8 a D- LL LL V wU<L c Z-'0 mp LL W 0 C W m 0 o U. c U m o U Z Lo m m m w w .m :O N a. IT u) F- LL LL LL• Ir-I J a o? Z LU U J O a O U L U J E Q i a < Q U L 0) 0 o N t7 LO C3 ° O 0) N to c0 N O O N M 2 . O O O aO t O M ° a°p co to O) c0 CO cn n N 'i O to to P- cv 11 O - fA c0 tO f0 O O H! O to (H V t9 to N9 } J O LL r O O C) O O O n N O OV O- CO N ° m cq 0) o ?. -o c0 NO OOD p Cl) °O N (O O N co O ch O -t ^ N to Cl) 0) D ? o n?oo tOt ?tnv LO ?v O CD LO `o E to o O O to O O N ?- N OD W V 00 O N° °O?j M O o _N W Y O LO O 'n 0) CD N ° O N co v Lo N m O th c) co ° o ° K n N ° to to Cl) tT ^ o (O co tO ( O O 16 (V cfl V to L N O O O (COD, OO O O W N 1? LO M N 00 O) V, co O O N °0\) co O o I ' O co ° V co to N O) (0 c+) 0A M v r` N c) rn '7 0I r ° LO O CD O O O O q w c co ( N V ? cA } ..J . L O O to Cl) LL U co ° O° C) O p r C4 CO I-- o) N o o co to o 121 -J V c0 C, co O O c ? O o N O to N t1). O c+> CO O v t` N O i n m N C'J O O ? f0 to t0 ° ° w LO m N 69 V z Cl) 69 V o' o O U) Cl) E w) O O O U') O O N N co O> v co O N o o O 0) o D Y W M «) rn N O N t0 O Cl 0) T 00 m co v N O r t+) °) N ri ° CO CC) 09, m to co C) O u V N Cl) t9 (n rA O) c L c W m 0) O O N O O LL W N c0 m co U m rs tU O U ? l1 E > m .m 2 W . O m O (D C O 0 C,4 y m E- E m 7 >..+ a i ? `V' C a to O w 'O 1 0 W O 4) U m LL' 4 C's V ` O l6 L O ? N o 0 N w o U m m• 3 a N o m E 4 a N O Q w N E m ' .? -a N to O 0) a, LL m O Iq F- U U P a)Z.w 2tn co II o E-0 v a -D E W M v (u v Z N o 0 g a, a) r m c Q m O1 m U C N ?R c m V Om m LL LL !a 7 n V w O) m m . W O > to N U p . . 0 U i U) m C m m m Cr Q O 0t m M } m p 3 .6 O o E L u m a U, E U U m o m c U o H Y ? ? m 3 y o a m c Z a m > rn v ' c H m E iL L U !L (D 0 0) a) a) _, p y _ p d o o m o a a s m U) co co n U •?° c c m m n s W E Q° Q o a)-5 U) oQcnw U) Qc9 it m co QU a co to Uat- t1LL LL U 3 Y UU ?;' +- ? N m N H m m m O U d U N O) - - m m CX. U m m U m U 6 2 0 O p O m N o O m q U) O i m C C L m U tl = m Q LL LL LL LL n n -o Q - i 2 c < LLLL n m LL m a cr (5 u E LL a) om ? 3 Q. E QU E n ?dF to v v v 1 Q c i m a m 0 ) a) m `m m o G o m m w U z z L- F- in CO a H H o o to m 2 o D C7 m O U N n o U itf m `o m p 2 co :3 O wN N m Q O y L m m U V C p C U Q U LL o m c O O q o? c [L C i v C N! V (A N CD < LO U O) O F-- N N V N y fA cA 49 O U N r- O M sl?; r- LO r- ^ tO O to O_ L? N_ .- V tO C7 tL) ^O 6% to C14 C*4 D. us (fl ff) (D CC 0) W 0) O N L 0) O O) O) O E } tT /A O W N ti OOO°COtOo N LO O N N O to - N O C CL o O m OC CO C t)) sO'? ooEcz m 3 J?ma°m J m Q a tr co N • • 0 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATION PURPOSES 0 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2005 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It finther moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables f October I Enrollments - page 31 Table I -Thirteen Year Historo The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October l of each year. Table 2 - Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 32 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1- Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. • 29 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. 3. Factor 3 - Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births.. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 - Projection Models - pages 3341 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ? Table 3.13 (pg 33) - shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ? Table 3.6 (pg 33) - shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ? Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 34) - uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ? Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 35) - breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ? Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 36) -breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ? Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 37) -breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ? Table 4 (pg 38) -Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ? Table 5 (pgs 3941) -shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 30 W) ° M • « m o(1) p.oNfmD rri?`) Tw C , to ? N 0 N- to m A N `f. CD tq m _ N O CV co( W W O W O m M CV a N C? O r O Lo 1? 4+ O N A r T 1A '?3 co C, - o n m ?D. Q W W r O N O W f W O ? - M O N . r r r r N 4 _ y O O m n O O d N ch et o N 0 W W W W. r r r r W [z t ,.? O N t?pQ ?p aD n to M p d O 0 1 © to m e m `p? O r r .'D O ?f g W W, r r r e c` r T' st N p m n - N. O. . _ r c" r, C-4 t? a m t0 o IT N O O. W m o N o co co M rn r ? co . r O ?. M•? OO c6 W M m ?' N M to N N m m to O M 11 O N O KO O O O A b M o W ° ^ N to t- W I W W C D O o a . O1 c, m O?aNO0 rrniuWittOnmo wrnN Do N co c" W W W W W W N M r m. D r O r IV > co r co to co MO O O O N a co N co T o . f W cD W W G) O co m N . to ? N m E Q n W _ M m 0 0 n m 'V W M to to W n W m M a m m W O V' o ° Co N -O - c C N W W W W W W W W W co m N N M . 0 m Q {{ ?. l? m n m W V' O V M co m n co m to V co n M M N m m m m N W W W W W W W W CO W m n N r m M ?0 O. W r N @ m. ) D Q Q i?'.":. 0 y : Lo W ^ n M M V' N '7 m m W N N m to m N M N n m m 0 m O m ° O N W m S _ , W W W W W W m W m W W W m m N 6 f `- r N C y O W O M 'V N O W 0 N m W N @ '? '.. W MtomNNNton m mvmM W W W W W W m W m W m n m tn C ' r M ui W Cn O l6 J co .- O C9 C N Y .- N M st m m n m W r r Q CC9 a ~ 0O a a' m Coo C W N co w cWD _cp a 14- M tG 00 Go CID 0) m 0) to m N V' U) Cl) N M t°o M CV N V' to to O Cl) M V' v m Cl) N pOp co r n 00 co 00 co P? CO - co C) N N n co N N to to NI?r to co N Cl) V' M C.4 to r- C-4 m I-t cv) co 't G N _ 1.- 00 OD N W N to to N't LO tv) N M co M c mo V' '7 O N V' m at CD CO W 00 OD (1) 0 V (Do in (D N IT «) M N M 'm7 cOo Co _ 0 f m o M m m W m m M co W C co O O O VN WV' O OD N to O m N or m M N Cl) O M 'It N M V' ° m M a°D OND' O r OWD 00 W N U') to N 7 Lo N C.) v a C> W) cel - C) 00 r, OD cli " N [Cm0 MLoLO Nr'M ?M I?r N n W n M to O co v LO W m n M W N co V' co W to IT m m N co co 1? C3 co to m M V' tWO Nco ciD C) C14 - M V M ID M Co n to co W r O M N W CV rn m o na o0] N CD n coo ow W M to to m IT m N M V' N W W m m N W M V• M N W N W) to N IT 9) N- N M N n 1- 0) LO mnm rnnm nmrn mtq m W N to co N V to N N M N OD to W 'sr co N O CD V n W m m O O m m co M O to m OD (D (D m Nvtt to N°N Cl) N to to N ° W co m ' N m co m or n m n N ' M V m v m M W M W O V U O, CO m '7 m m to to m n N N N N t0 m N V• LO N N M N 0 a Q ? tom M to m m m W N N r Y Y Y r r r t m n n ' C o y 0 • t!1 O O N fn .fl O V O z O U W O w a H Z W J O N R z W 0 D H N H _U F- N D O O U W Z ix D m D Q Z LL w ; w0S L i F- ea w'v < Q A ' m W Q j / _?tl y Go) 43) 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O bl a Q) (A Lo m N !-- W w m w N v O co m fD W W O O m W m m Of I- W q S ^ ^ . O Z O L _ _ . f - tCt .d `.... Lo La T L0 + w C-4 r M V W V N W V?? W N M W M N (D Lo N M cq W OM) W (D W) m M W n f z. ? m m > (1) W- Y w Q M 0 M t t t t t t t t It t t V t t V V M M M t cn C'7 M C+}". °ef •? ^t Q Q <> Z J ? .? O w - CL W U O m _ i M Z)Z Q W Q ; v U^ C ?a`a`aa 0 it tr m Q S v v S w w J O O l0 C N N W W W O W W W CO N O M f` W M O O r- V M W V O N CO o N N 1q M r. CO M E Z J W >> O Y N W 1` M O W M W N M N W r W O N M N W W t` W V V O N M tO CA CA O N co W UO U)? CO W LO W W 1'. n W n a0 W co O) CA C) to a) p) D) W W O) W CA D! W m Op co 0) Ch N F- d z- Z w w ` O a? 0 F' Cq W S O W b M W V W W W W O W 1- O_ M N V N W W M M M _M f` N M W t` _V CO N N V W N M t- N W 1` W V O O V N N O) N N co W< t` r N N- N h N M '7 V - w :3 1 F- W V W O V LO W M M O t- O N (D GO Lf) W W W O M< CA LO < O t- W O O M Co W N r Q:.(7 Z M J!K m O co M t` V M M M M V V W W n W W W M M < V W V O ?: N V N N N N N N N n <<<«<«<<<<«<- < N N N N N N N Z `1 Y Q N N N N N N N N N N N U LL q J Q J LL O W h W M 0 N M V W W f` W M O N M V W W h W M 0 N M V to W t? W M O? W ap a ao W W W 0 O O O O O O O Z w 0 w ```` 2 T T < a e W Q T 0, e! M T M? 0 0 tO W h W O) O N m -t .0 W f-- 8 M O N co V w w h w M 0 N M I C[) CC) 1'- D Q) O U3 p } W r t` r t? n W m W W W W W W W W M rn M M M M M M M M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0< a U J Z O n O O S M M M M M W _M t- V N co O 0 a W CO M O < CO W O^ M M LO to V co W O co n V N O t- t- W M W M M 0 0 0 - t- N M CO O N O co V V M M O M M CO W I-- M m W O V O V V O O W O O CD h N< M O W W O i0 M W W V C7 M< N' T M V N N V W C ) v a v ` V Q U) < m W O U v v v kO kf) W) Ml W CD CO CO (D f- 1 W CO I- W rn In W 1` n t.- t- r 1` 1` n 1- z `t) S ( W co O rn V W m W oO OO V Ul M W o o N V? N M OM r- M 1- M WO ° W io 0 3) rr- LO CD co CA N co ?. O. F- M O W M - r O < < W M M O F, O N V )O M W M N O CO M W CO W M W co W M CO M N O V . S N m M M O M M W M M M O - < < N N N M M W V- ^WM V - W V V V V V V V V W J Cq < _ N W co W M M M O N W V O O < C•') V pp M V W M O M M W N C) n W M W S Q F- W N M V M V W w m N C) 0 M 1` t` W O M Lo V M W M M " N a O q V _ O W 1- W M O W V t- V V IO hW 0 b W< act W M A M W O W t- n O M O O b W N O V h W V M O J m O M W M M M M M V N W W ? W W W M M N to Cp O W N N N N N N N N N« - << `-' «<<<<«<<< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O J Q S Q M O N M IT N W f? W M O N M 'i1 Cn CO h W M 0 M V W) CO P- W M O V N N M W h r n h t- n t- h t- n co 6D W W W W CO O LL M U Z } W W W M ) M M M M M M M M O 0 C) 0 C) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m m M M co M M M M M M M C) 0 0 0 0 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < N N N N N I 0 0 0 0 C, C:, 0 0 >.In - N W V N N N O V W 'IT. q O L - N -O M to < .- M < O N W N N N N < b < W W O W N V N W < L w M C7 Q !n O c m Z ? N M V W W ? W M < O n LL O W g m _. } Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O $C y m O lD Y < N Cl) V W W t.- W M < m l0 CA a c L U C O 0 m tr > -a w -a I c ro p- 0 C. N N W N O W N Cl) aD to m '? L M W M M r n o b M co o t- > o m W W m ci ui o ? ao m w a W 0 m Ow • > Q 11 LL. .... Q J m W O N 2 N ? J Q N O < 9 tl) Q N m A - W t• O p m Q 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 'O C , )n W n co M LL E £ 0 W Cl W 0 W ; W 0 V C) W C) N 0 W C) W 0 V C) N a O C) W - W < M 1n -' W O < M W W, CO 'Q N > N < N M V N V -O J -; U) N> a m m @ CCJ - a tQ Y < N M V W co n W M O < N m N 6 C W tT m -C V l0 L p v .. m m a o O C7B co O M M N W co W N N N M M W M M W O M CO q O I- W N V N O > `N w N O O W < < N V M V W V I O ? '.. ? N M V M M y 2 . O O _ M N N Q } Y < N M V cO W h W M < N M O M M /6 O LL t m S `o c m C W CL m C O M C C N R N M LO 0 M • O r' W M M w to m n Goo 0) co m m m OD 0) n w a, 00000000MN O0) N a m m W N O M m m M 40 V m o C) d c+> M 7 W m m w m m n m m? 0) a?a,oooo000 0 ?v-0? on co m) v co 0 m n V co m) n N m 0 0 r n N M w m to m m m tq n m m N M O ?p a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O b n 0 (D 1,0 n N co co O N <t n O P- M 7 o N M v"tm m W m b n MC)" V co ? a, 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ? eN- ? ?t ^ a Lf) Wm O N to V' M O tp rn O m m o N M V v to m W m US N C5 LO m N W .t a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N? 0? m ? e-i r M m O M N m m1 O N O O o_ d ". N N v V' m m n n O N W) 0 N M Q CO M 0 o 0 C. 0 -O O O CO N C, of O .? a o 'HMO mm orn?maNnmM,N,o O C n N N M 6 W m n M 0 a' N O O O O O N O m O O W O O O O n m a o M N al V m M W n O n n M N m o O mm N M M `7 W M N N n O M M p a a, 0 0 0 0 0 O O O V? N O M O m O n N v n to M N m v a to C-4 m V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO U3 m m O am, 0 0 N N 0 Ir m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m rn M N CL o m a? o (3) 0) C) C,) m C4 t- CD w OD a o Cl) OD OD q,cL°' m Ma' rnNo0orn H:-;t tn d Q I, j O n^ O ,Oa n N M N W m> w co m O m) m) O m) O O O r N a . ? c c m b m m cm m 10 w If f Q 0 m m O N m O N m n w co 100 C, d O) O O O ai O O O .-- aM- O V D_ Q ? c a 0 J O r' N M V m m n m a1 O? ? N Q a d O I ir- da'm? NMV °mrM-t-- wwmvtoNNN aD O- ?QD n r' 'Oa,co I ?o???Gmmn?amomLe) ?Im?° V O.- MMN??1111OLn a w t0 m r N m -4 W a' ZIto c) O N co O .- N O O W a (Y LL'j m n v n co W mf co N 0 o O to 0 0 0 C3 •- M ems-- m w M O N C00 N t2 I r ?IMaoamomCD my r c°.r°O? oln?nv O O O O H> M ,0 M N cl) 00 I R r- m m O O O CO CO r- Z,- m> 0 .? 0 0 M M m O M C M O 7 rM..I4? m m 0 m N O of m 0 O m)Im ?o a) m a' N 0 0 510 0 C, O N N Om I" 0 r- 0- -, O O N I O LO m n m m n n m v 0 M O CO) W cm 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- O O? N T O(D O a O N M V N N P- M Co m co m o M m n W m m W a V - mV N m a, O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O M O oI W 'C V' to m V N W O (Oa M ?IN10 a m m m, 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0" •- M W N m m co 0 co m O N M W N e It o am, Cl 0- 0 0- N - N N N? o ? a Q n N co m co .4- 0 W M M m?? C IV N aoa,ooa,oa4"Cl V MO?4om 'L d Q I 'n N N V CO m? N M O m m a D am, 0 0 0) 0 0 0 47 N N O CC) Q m N U) V W n M M N m m Vr Ur p 0 co O N m a N m n m m m a ?a J m to m t Q O- N M U-> m n m 0 C, co Y O F • 0 co Go 0 rn N N N ? r r r ? 7 O O ttO O N OD ti O M N O 0 Cl N n O N O N OD ?' O `- if M 0 O M O O O d Op N 0 r O CO eorn C0Mto r O `- M N Q) r M M a' O O O N c O to a Z O LO G) O 0 0 N CMV N M to U (L v 0 0 0 0 O W a O 0/ 0 M 01 0 0 CV t) OD F a t° °)MM-C M"-m z W OD cj o n m o v w o J O o J ?Q' N 0 0 0 0 0 0?? O O °- N r O O` Of N N O r n O) N O M N N n O M r rnrnrnrnooo(.-C-4 o Z a w D O N 0) O 0 O •-- M N O) V' O 0 N O O 01 M M X O O O O r 0 0 0 O?? .- O N a 0 CD 0 0) U_ C> to 0'qr OD V N O OD ° r. N Ir O N O ax n 0 0 0 0 0? N r M `1 CL Oa OR Ol 0 0 M ?- o J O O co 0 0 0 M O OD 01 N n 0 OD O O, a 0 0 °i m 0 0- 0 O? N N O M 7 O Z y' U N o aD Lc) m ol LO P- P.- C14 r-. cli ZL (?J d O O 0) tO 0 0 CD - 0) ° - - - N - M 0 m Q ? -- o Q v m -, n n o a' C) Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 .? v t0 a IM O Q O N to v w r 0 M N O OD co to .? p 0) 0) 0 O OMOi C. O O M 1- 00 ap 00 O Q n ? C 7 w to J Q J m m Q Y N M d W) to r w 0 a C a Cl) N CO 0 O N (0 co iB Lc) C.) ? OF TI F M OD 04 W) W) r r Cl) O 00/ 0) c M N 00) X tp O O C14 O a. n aD r M 0 t0 N COnnrn°o ? O o o v M ? o 0 a V tD 'T 0 O OO 0 0 0 to m .- O v v n 0O CC td to o w o00o v ?o M CL O !Z 0 0) N to N W Om a' N n 0 N O O O O O v M r e-- -? N O? °o WC m Ina°ovocn 0 0 0 0- O O v N O a 0 0 N N n M M OD O .-- OOD r aND O 0 t0 t0 0 C3 'It V a o rn rn° o 0 0 0 o v V o cn r N W CO O O N? M O O o N O O O t0 'f to O O W .?-- CD ?f p rn 0, rn CD 0 0 0 0 0 Y N Co. C4 a o O co O O 'ct Co O co tq O N M 0 0° a' p 0) 0 0 0 O O 0 N V a tD a o 0 O° Z; ,°O N cn o IV co CD c%> co 0 n LO o c o rn ?n°cornoooo°oov00 a C, O 0? O N O? N 0 0 0 0 a' 0 00p 0 0 0 M 0 0 t0 N N? C) O ? a ? o { J C C Q O N M0 v co n 0 M N O co O to M M 0 0 CO O N M r w co co CO 40 Q (D M V a rn rn rn o CD 0 0 0 ° o- Q C 3 ? a w m < 00 -1 CO Q p- N m v Lo t0 n O m C e- Ni'? a M Y O H U) 0 0 v M is 0 Ce) rn VOD Oa(o 00000 co CD ONO m Co V tO co CV n 0 0 0 0 0 r 0) vOOao a F, N C7 V to to M C`p 000 00 O rNV OtO ` N C7 V V t0 CO 40 00000 tO to ONOV N Ch V V tO t? O O O O O V M O O O N ° NNV '4 U3 C7 Cy O O O C3 C> C7 -(o OHO ° N N°) VLo M N O O O O O N 0)V O0)co NMM V Cq 0 0 0 0 0 r N V r O O O V O r R) 0 00N000 o o too Oo ° Nt+)t7O 0) co O O O O O O 0) 0 t70D 0) Ot'7 cli 0 0 0 0) 0) M i `O : Vv C.10, a $; n Le) oo00 w0 0 o D !1 T z r a 1-- 00 C, O °orr °o W 30 0) 0) 0) O l0 t6 O (7 O (00 00 (0)) O 0)0) 0)? p? w = w N m V O !d rn rt7o 10) w O ON th V o O?-Nth tO 10 N D I.: to r O C) V O N O O ? ? V O - - - - - Do to O Nto Wr V ° 0) MC3 ;: N tp O O Co tp °(orwtn W CO O CD N O O C O V V co co O r - V r O' O N Cv? O O O to Ch w 0) c, w ° (0 0 O 0) O CV N 0 00 O Co N r O M 0) LO CO r O0) N 00000 Cpi 0)NtM V V COOr0) V 0 00000 rn O 0 0 0 a CD r 0) 0) tp tO V O ° C7 O V N 0) O OOOOO t0 CO C 4 [7 co M r O 0 0 0 0 D V 'It 0 E { N co C O t- ID ?CD 0) Ch(")O0)m OOi OOi O0,O tea' d ? rai '- N C7 V to (7 M co O n r (O co z O 0) `V O V O 0) O (A M O 0) r N CID C14 O O f 0) O N 0) N N O co co rO' rn rn rn rn C4 D 0) co d 0 Go co mr 00000 0 M°o C-4 ED In t- 0)0 0) -CD N 0) O to O O LO OVi OOi000))? N to OOOCp1 C7 0) 0) o f t? C) I 0 0) 0)?? CID L C Cl) Cl) 0 0) LO kc) O.- r- NMV to rn O n tD Lo O V (0 O V Of Cv> C3 O co °'Otr N O O O N CO N O O Ozz O O 0) 00 r? O 0 0 (V 00 o 00 0) 0° 3) V O O 00 O O V O It C-4 CO O C) O 0 0 0 O 3) co V tiNO N to ° 0 0 ° 0) 0) ° 0) C) to 0w 0 ?- C ?? tO ° 0) !to ° 0 93 p ' n ' ?a Q m W CV V) VtO th ? • 0 1 W) 0 0 a m 0 v O Z _O U W ON W a I- Z W J J O r? Z W O N H U N J O O S U Z ix D m D Q m co 0 m e 0 Z Z:;: co 0) v 0) X00000N (D a o 0 01 m aD M o 0 CO m m a 0) a 0 0 0 N m a < `° o -'nnvmno O< m m [O M O) jr (p O O O N m a r co) O (D LLD N V O o 0 m m co M Ol X tq o O O N (D a < . M o 0 (MD co D N W O O O N (D a M o OD o)OD o (vl O a O N (f a M -'?rnovoo 0 M F- M m b ( NOOO n,D a M 0 b M N v °O w< O O O M OD N a o < M N m W 0 0 0 O O I'- a M v m M to o 0 MI-Ma ° 0 jrDa o0 CO (D CL o< rn< M N to > o z co U . 0 ° O N co (O O( Lo r- cm a o o C. m v N_ CL = -j n m M N icQ N. 0 Q F- N M M M .. co O O O M y a j c c Q m v m n W N N U Q O N _M m _0 C9 Q Vi F- O O O< M O U ?-m Q w O ? a M W co a H Ir U3 r- co m '? Of M I-- M M o 0<nncoM m N n N a < ? co Lo Co W) r- 0 (D r- ovm a < < < M ^ N t- CD 0) co N O tO M to CD m t0 < n N I a •- t- Go CD O?v?DaW) (0 EY iO < 4 C.) n N a < tc) O N O O c 0 v v m W N < M a OZMM--t-t c3 W fL' c7 < < ? O m a (.; N to W (D o ? N N O N O N a < < M Ci n Mv?r vPe 0-< n n m ? a _ o 0< m (D O N O O Q O O O O M It n n- N O O N It W) o O M m v n n 0 0 0 0 M a O ° no m m o aooOO'?(h;? --j co 0 O w m M .n * O ? o m o o ? 0) a e n0 n co m n 0 OD a O 0 0 0 n N 0 c c J t,...., O O N OD r- 0) cc m c) co 0 O F- Q O O< M p= Q C W m p O m mQ? ?QmnODco F M O O c' ? m a < c M n o a < 0 n 0? N a (`p O O a co •- O m m ko 0 !Z o M N n m C W O 0 C. 0 N O) co; CL a 0 O N co to O N N n .? O O O v a MO "I 0 v O O N m < N O O W O O a o M o 0 < O n rvi ° N a O O O N I.- O n v o 0 . uD M N 0) P - cc < o O O m N a o ? < '- M N CD o O O O O 3 co a 0 O IT m c) m o C> "r m 0 N 0 Q co 1- o O ? to ao<rn<(:? N C. ? m O n N 0 o Of N co L" O> o?ooa(Dv H. o n o O° CO N a M M W o c 0 0 0 w M c C D° o N oD r- 0) m cc M m 0 0 V to 00<1°`0 c Q c ? 8 a cl) w O m uj < co n ao a ? C7 m O T a D a n ?- ?n W M 0 < O O a' tp O O a < m m t- N o 0 ;25 OD nO nOV M O a' O N Of (+) y O O N W co O O N y a M ?va, o)aa) 0 v co v LLD OD N W M Co O < N M < a o O??NO°'on° a N O O N N n a M o ? N M ? n v 'o O, < n n m uD M W<< O O M l 0- o < N N n o < m m M N O LO a 0 0 0 O 't N n a < C4 0 O< (°D C-4 v o n OW OZ) o • 0 0 < M 0- O cl) 0) a C, m 0 0 a r- CD 00 a to W co a C, -7 co CL cli 0 0) t- O m m m co Wrrm0O mon a o°' Cl) o? P- CD M aooooov<io c c J m c (a O 40 a _.U O g O< M O .-U, Q c 7 L m o 0 a O m mQ? ?mncoOD M 0 _ 0 0 (D Cl) 0 LO O 0 O O M N r 0 0 CO CD n r r v o 7 m °) w v m o O r m n m m o n N Q: t? M N r O. p 0 a •- O n N aD m o o tonmMtmmI- a _CD M N -a W O 0 oh?MON W to M N O m m N a v o ?LO tnrnomoo O O N M o n m w a' M N r O n O p a r r r It N o O N O m v a' (h M N in P-- M CC) N CO a M N n co M W o aO r O v m O M N M O r n p 0 a'- ?'v o -) N O. N F- O M N M p r M r O n v N aaw r r r e} O 0) 't 0 co O to rn Cl) M mm ? O N ? O nv a r r C5 C4 Lo Of a' O M N +M- m r 0 a o r r r v o 0 O N n 0 m r .- C) N g O n O m M B r w N ,? a M ? m n N n N CD ' ._ 0O, Q O CO) O 0) M N t-- $ C) M M- r r to ci M tJ, ' n0 _ N O 7 m O Of CA m O o CD m M c) C? - r N ° O O L ? a L, C J C C Q ID O M N Co N m m J° n w m m M O O ~ O M r ° tp O _ Q c a Ll CO) w ~ o? J o O O N r f a r r N cr) 0 O(D m 4 M m o xm O r t m M o- o -7 cD 10 QD LO W) 0 ttO ODD MV Nan C? O N r Ln ! n a r vo 0 r- Nom v Lo C3 a tq ` N O N tp Cp a m 0 m O m N Y o O TZ M m 'n m m N N a' tip O cv) r O O L O a r O N m t?0 O° n W V\ m r r Lo tc N a N m co m m n O n o m m to a r o r mC) O tD N r M r r ° O a r 'o C) N o O ? Cp v cj (D C, M tmo 0) Ix r I .N- N O p 0 o r M M m Co r o [h a' C) v r 0 0 sr N a r r r v N O v) a C) -r O O CO M v) c) tt a' O O N r rC? 0 N a N i c3) O N M O O° M N 0 C14 a co - - N C' cNi M: ? Y ?1. m N to n O M M m n O M co N a O V M O r C, 0 4C) CA Yri 4 n co C) to O 12 N O v 0 m t0 cl, M m a. O O r t? O? O 04.E a J c c 1'..: Q m O M N m N DQPZwwwm O F- O M M 0 r ° O LO 0 U m o 0) _ o m w' fn < O r N N a m= M O m P?7 ? CO m O n N O' m M N r O?? N n v o M CD r m v rn° O O N m N C7 ? a' r M ? r O n 0 ... a r ` o 05;mwm)mm a' m N N r O n N r a v o ? (0 o W n M M v O to N N r O n m N CL r o O w N O n W (o M M N C) 1-- 00) a r CV a c) N N m (nD Pm) tOvD CY) { N n m M O o O O ? CO O M ? N M N O n 0 0 a. v o 7 O? N n O M M M p ? r M r N 0 n v N L r r o ?rwvomaD 0Or O m v Mntp O N N r O o- r '? td C) CII LO CIJ a' W? N ? ? CnD r O., C o r r r v o" 0 C) N n 0 m n O CV V O n 0 mO M N N r Vm N __ CID n N n N m O? O M O m M N n 0-C3---rOtnci o N_ O M O o 0 52 0) 0) OD OD a' m0 ?! N O Co to a C C Q m Q) M N C9 N O 0 J° n m m m M O O C) M M o m0 0- Q c ?a w F' p O IV Q w ° - a O M N M (n n O r O N m m n N m a' aD tq ? O t0 to N a `" o O CND O n v O w a r 'n O O?mt?Nrnw"' a' tp N O 0 0 Q. r r to o ? m M CA m N O o V) O C) N r a r o O? N m F;: v n w v O r ? O a r O CV Co m M m u? ° . r 0 r- OD w C7 v m O m w, N OrwNO rcv)) CID a' N r r O O a r r r tq 0 0 04 mvC-4 - otmWM V OZ a M M m CO '- o ) a' O? N r 0 0 ? ? a r ? v cq C) o 't a' M W) N 0 to v a 0 r r O N p 0 N Cl) O -E - M a 0- N N T V N r O N O n O Cl) 0 M m n O M M N o v - ° : LO ° O a O2",! vV FODtOM 4D C) 0 0 - - r to to a c c co CA M N OD N f0 ?? n m m m M O O o- Q c a a aq°' o r rN r? • 0 • 0 0 N d .Q 0 v O N Z O H U W O sY a F- Z W J J O r? Z W Q) F U CO) J O O U Z w D m D Q -3 0) O P.- W co O Of O aO N M n ? O a) 0) v m -1 ? O (D CD N T• 0 o r 0!- -W co -"I O2z co a) NN -7 O`Z v 0 or O N NC h d a) O cr r- a N CD 0 0 X n d r- N )n M C7 a' r (L r a) C7 n v 0 V r O O OD 0 O OD CD CD P- O n N co O O (D '•! O a to v co a a CO p)° EL - to N V)icn a° ?V a ° atoVLC m O c o V -7 co O n M ov (D O O co b N cocnnv O O O a oc V o co 0 0) a to ? L 1-t 0 C14 O O a. c v EL LO C C l) ccn M cc a n v O co 0 c. O? NMV N 0? ??°n.N a v °' ° jr `T cn to a M M M C4 (L a n v in v o ? cvc 0 co CD ? 0 ! - co -v 0 0 N ) to 0 v ° vin n Cn n 00 (L (L to a - M?MM ?? a VVVV 0 C, 0? v co -? C) 0zz °DOc(O ° Or, -? co 0 c )) aN O? a - 04 X ? t- 0 - ? a . (`7 C'7 l7 cn a vLovLo -1 C4 O to o 04 O :!z cO n C', O r- v v v CD ((D N O 0 -0 OD LO m co CO co a ? ? m 0- MChcn a? ??vM O 0 0 O cA N 0 W N C(OD N - O o' O .- a° rnrn 0- W) a° 4 C? ° 00)) c o°o)C aO a r v vv a -1 O ' 1 0 a> CM D O a) CD O) N N ' O 0 C ' a) N N 'V O V N N N Of O O ' m (D cn CD 0 CO v- v 0 0 r N v N IT n co n C7 a o O O O Of d ao n)nv(n a ao O O cochcoc%? 0) ao OD O CD O vcnIt cn M 0 ° mooo 0Q co v n co 4 u5 o O OO n Cl) n cn OCDOCO a) O° n O n O n n It 0 W O O D) OD a 0 CD C°n co O/v to a O 00 e7 eq (+? eV a o v v v V Q: O O D) N 04 0 0 •" t7 e) O CD w - 0 O N n N n co 00 CO O CD Cl) CA M m co CS C-3 N<, p_ O :'R 101" oOD Er n 0_ O oorno cD o v to w) n Q. O o o M io Co r) n d O o000 Cn Cn 0 0 a ` a 0 o n v a) C3) 0? co co O 0 O° co v a) v 0 Q co Lo to Lo 0 co ccoo f0 ao a0) O) OD 0) (D CD d' cD ao Of co a) 0) vvvv d' CD 0. 0 CncOCnco W co a. 0 O O O O )Ocncncn Z Q to O 0 LO 0 Cn Q tO O N N N N M c) cn C'7 Q tD D a) m O O CD (D CD QD Q m O N N N N co M m m W Uo rnrnrnrn ? Uo vvvv p V o MCgioe p 0o acoDCU)LO a Q ? a ? a a 0 -' w l O' a w co co MQ s 0) w Q `T p W C n V) Cl) Q cD (D ( D d (7 ' U 0 Y w w w L 101 1 W LLl w w U m m 2 0 co (A CO CO O CD CO o :!z OD C-4 co m 0 a -- 0 O CO w v 0 a ' 0 m N Cl) ?(`OVcn a 0 cog nvuNi LO n cn, 0?c°n°n 0 CC) ?2 N co 2Ic co n _ O ;- M s --3 co O 6 ° N to a1 -Lo CO1iv O N N aD CO r- LO M ? M 7 cn) t ,a,co nrna 0 O co N O O co 0 N CO O O C, ° co O n O iv cn o 1? n?(D cn n W 0 O OD 0 N CO C3 00 0 v tT v v lnl< (DCO CO O OD H F° CO 0 0 0 11 Uo`T ?r oQ w Co 1-1 O ko ° 0 co 0 m m a) ? l0 ? N m U U C C O m m ? YYX io m m t it N m r 4) m m m mmUU C C O m N 'y C D ? Y Y at! 0000 S = S = W Q W 1d' r LU U } m m r m CD f7 M t7 th a a a a N C [0 f6 U ro Q Q U ? > O O O O a 0 0 ? U) Z 4) 4) rZ Q C C U;; C 7 m D. o' rn rQ 07 U o c Ec E?7 O ?Q U .m m Ll W Q O O v ?aa w m O z a !i 11 W J Q b F- o 0 0 0 o Xx x O O N N OD _ X r ; N N X m m 0) ? m r N V-- r m m o C) w CO W OD t' m m co co F- 0 0 0 0 o XnnNN x m O r N O O r O n CD x Xmrmir-cn m cO'O m O O cn m m co n to p c o c o m t o o o Xco nmco x co d ch N O O vi 0 v7 - M n N m O m d ? N N t7 a?0 d m O aD n n L O C D m m -- 0 tD w 0 c0 x 0 0 0 0 X d O NO m O r O O LO to G m? XX X N ttoo r d m O O N m F m m m m x o 0 0 0 o nao XUmco O r O r d m mo x m CO m n X t+, d co d m'm F- co o n CO m to m W> %n , 0 J ? O m m Q ? M W M M t c 7 ` Q a a a a O O O O o X?*ovo xtormn N N N N OD g. tt X O N O N O) o m av av cn [ `r m t7 Wik m m to o OG m m m p cn CV N N N F- 0 0 o 0 o x m 0 m O xr))ncon n m o 0 p X m d C%d O d d r m O m ?p Ol C aD rn aC O C4 N N N N N o CO m x N N N N O O O O co 0 X". a" n d'cmNm m co Go O N N' N N N x o 0 0 0 o Xdv,?v m x LO d t0 V' m d " d " r O F m a m C O o O N N N N N 0 0 0 ?X t+) n c0 r )( d O "It Cl O O O O ,It m m 6 x X v N v N n iO m m o F n ? n n N N N N J M f7 Q r m m -- LLl W W w t'7 O cn r ¢aaa ` n a o 0 0 0 o y n? n c n x N r N r co m m M m c+) m p n d n d m m W, N I-- N d N: CD N m cQ co Ywmmco O N t'4? C N N F- e o0 0 o axxt N (D W) (O n or n v) X O O O O n ? x o 0 X N N m C N i N tv] N ? n m n o ? r- co N + - C%j *1. N N O o o O o X C 00 n X O r O r O W tt= x tO 0)o Xv?v m,mmcom LO o co o to cn m. O co a O C'. N z- N N N F- O o o O o X m O m O d C7 d cn to 9t X O d O d ? c°n°n rn m to M m CD m CO m m m F- N N „N N N x o 0 0 0 o X o o d Cl) d M d 61 st ? Jx( X 0) m m m W Ir0co ID 'D O N M c) (") m F- N N N N- N D W w w W f- M M cn m Q s s ` a a a a O O O O 0 ??tt x O N d CO XX cnmvao O O r m d m o m? a X D d (7 r r N m r d m i? m r> to co N n rn: co cn cO 04 r N F- 0 0 0 0 o Xmcos?m X ? t7 O O O O n °) t x C%j W) to o Xv to O (D m d N N N N o O O o o X O N O m x m O Cl) m O O N r co mtt-- O XommcO X M N N t+) N N co u? m ch N N N N x 0 O O O o X co M c? m JC fi UO r c7 m m X O M n Xmm cn ?? ? - N N b m O IS m M LO O OD OS: m m m F- r X 0 0 0 0 o N W) cq t7 X o m m d _ ? n m o m r r m ? 0 c'4 m u m ? c o ; F- er- r r # •--. Q J M r Q r m m o D IL W W W F- M t7 t7 m " a Q a CL Q CL 0 C: 0 • N C O N y y V d ? ro m O - ? N Y O Y f0 m m C 5 Y z _ j tD m m p ¢ a ?y ? ?cotT W > > Y Y 7 06 .6-6.6 a 0000 I-- ~ ~ W _ _ _ = S C Q a Q J Q Co M to - M t0 r (O M M M M aa `.a W n ~ y U 0 m m F- v < < m O O J O a o 0 0 ? v v (A,? Z m m U ) M U C o m Q 0 . o co N N ¢ p p t a l o ? W aim U 7 m O z a b'. tl " U u rr ?Q . 0 °°N Xn v n O O O O M 00 v°° ? O v N CD Cl) Cl) h r0 OD 00 OD co to tb°S tcoo to F- X m n to r- X v r- N M N 9 " x O N X W N (O 0 N v "W V W:W) v ?p W O OD CO to t0 to co co F v n v v X CO r> W to O v O O O X ? 00 X??mrt i 0 N C-4 g on rn W M ? 0 m h}. t 0 ( 0 y M N O I x ^ t7 O W Q x x 1? H V h M O co I'- t q t 0 00) co to t` to w co m t H ?xCVmvm x O W tO W O O N N W M' X '? to M O tO O N x N n 0) O N n O1 aD o r` CD W CD CD 7 W W W W 1 '- M M M M c?Y ¢aaaa m O O O M ° t: O D xx C o? o X O M N 0 OD "[O CO CO LO LO LID V am M C ') C', tJ : M o X v v v v x 4 co "T co n t0 ? t0 N tC X to a U3 O to c) LO O 00 N N v N N ? N P C.Nh N $ N Cl) M i'?4 M c 7 mmLO v O v O O 0 X C> tO b t0 tO N v v [by v W N t0 tO W 0 M M C'7 Cl) Cl) H ?X?C CV m n t0 X IS V co -w N N N N 0 4 ? o ui o to W " W M N co M V ?p p _ O O O M M M Cl) co F- " " o ? v o v o tO ? tO t? N N v N W W ? X O t0 O t0 CD Q X W v W v W LO °? ?p ? n n n o W W Ot 0 M N N N ': cn ?{ (O W W W W cn C.) co Cl) U .`-- T -C. ` ¢ a a a a ' co M co M o N O N O n tri ? tri M 0 N? ?S O OO W 0 N N t0 0 N t0 W W N ?p M M M p M Cl) M M t-" ' e ' o Y o o t0 v tO ?1' O x co n co I - _ E; # N M N O - N M W W O V C-4 M M M M O F- - - It `A X N N t0 Ni tO 4 00 X X??toM N W W W O NO N N ,. . O M M co Cl) ' o N N O r O O 0 t x t` co t• co N Q O O W co n 0 n ? cv M r iM O x'' ??ti>ntn N 1 N W W W v W M W M OD 000 M M co M f- J? ¢ r r C() Y D W W W W ..: E ti - co M M M t ¢aaa ` a 0 to M U Cl) Oi tl-- o X CO N t0 W °O o O O V v N CNI ? r DO V O C ? M M' M M 'M o C C Xnmm to x v v m N O tk X aD t0 t0 OD O 0 ? O W m t0 N r rn M co M M N N 0 f 7 f 7 H O V N v LO N' Cl) N O O r 0 O 2S tp N M 0 O Q co M t0 0 N to t}- W co M O CD O W N,r co N ? ' ? M M [ T M M H ''' ?xXc 1- O O Cl) o x W LO co X O O O O 0 Oi 7 K X m N tD _ CD Q X W tO M O ?CC " " W v v O t0 t0 N O O M W ? C. o . M N F R o N v rn x ? t X M co v w O O v W co tk CD X LO f7 X?tM ?v O N A r t0 W W A D C 0 ? 0 m C D N M N N ? r .: cv) c) ¢ r 10 r (D ? Z) W W W W co M M M ¢0-aCL CL to O 0 O v 0 i 6 0 W Q Q m U') l m 0) t0 W ? Nm C U C ? Y Y W m O! m L t W jB jB r m N m a Q ? J; CO W V ?? c C ? ? Y Y 0000 T N T) S = S m co m r m ? m C7 m C+i of a a a a- 2 C _ 022 U m a a U > O m O O 0 O O Z C 7 3 3 tll U1 O -- co U c _ O 7 m m a o 0 r a a a a m O E U O Z a N p 11 6 0 h0- Q O O U C O CL ? 3 3 U N N D C ? t m N c C m N m O O E ip o n M Q E 0 o Oi m m m ? m o Y n a c o pOp 0 0 0 0 N -vM Xne Q O O O O d to g FE iz V W N m Q a 0 0 0 0 to r- to 0) N N CD 4 to x co co co mom X ` - - N M M W m co co ? c o co to co 1 - 0 0 e W r GO O o lo: V N M O r O O m o ??Cc W M oO RC nrn?? N to m V m f0 c0 co co co rtD r t` O r o m m m CO 0 0 0 0 c X n N .?- W M N 7- C14 N v N v cn v ? M O Q O X c N .? to C-4 cj o corgi m m m m i- Cl) c a IQ m ? W W W W 1- M M M M ` ` a a a a a w o 0 0 0 o N xx N m N m °? X O O m Q ?N.M...r m N` ?_ ? O M O M a o <a e ?xxc N to N N to O M W X O O O M to O fix( m N M O Q 0 N - N CD to Q In to CD C, ? M M M F - 0 0 0 0 ? O V O M Opt - Q ° M M o N v = ` CO mCD ?mmv? O M M M M ?, 0 0 0 0 Xa,v?v o M U'/ V M v o C') -- S ID Q O IN- N to N W N co m O ?o O {p LO Co W M W co m V co V O co M M m m H J r M ? . m m w (n .,. M Qaaaa d W o 0 0 0 o xX 'T M w M m a St w co N co X N r M r m W OD 0) CO m Q ' M a 0 0 0 o o rn OOj r 0 Ul) O N O N " 15 OQ >00) `r' 0 O - ?- N K,..mom Cl) m M o r i Cl) 1- x o 0 o e c W O` M 01 n X W W W Cn N CO N M 9, oQ ?C 52 °I mw °'w N N M 1- ? O W W! w N M NN M M M Cl) Cl) x o 0 0 0' o CO M co m X N O N O F-: Ul r- LO v 9 Q x o w o a) X C' u? C' m 00 N N r N r m W W N 6 M M M M M', ,;M M H JM tp N m m a W W W v' ? W ? M M M M Q COL COL a a 4 0 0 0 0 ?? o ? IDCD04 N N N Q O O O O m W g t O? K N N a o e o 0 o N W O N N N N co O N w m to N co cp, to W N F O n n 1- O C> to r- co x o 0 0 0 o x O O N x M N n O r O O a o O Q xCC X w m W 0 c o N r cn N M M M ? r r M 0 0 0 0 0 X?rCR v x cn C3 to 0 Q C', LO X N Nr 0 N N co," I- O O m V; v nv:LOvu? O M ? t? ? M r F- -j M to ` U) m r i m cn ) a F C Q CL a a M 0 0 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections N Lo O t\ - r- 00 CO LO N M f0 O O O LL O O O O O O O O O _ r r CO LO CO O CO r 0 O N Cl) r CO LL CO C.) C) Cj O R LL C O V O O V °) C 7 (A 2 O O 4) _O o E ° c m coNLLLL2fo al Ca G O O ?r cmc c O 4 U o C 0 4 q m c!°v2 -0 u? °° O m O ? O M Q 0 0 N W O c a o ? ? ° C4 N L h 93 Y v? Poach ? m l j O N O yC 0 2 t Q mV Q c C Cqq a eb M b C CD O 4 C W U- cc m o O ? ? m 4 4 w a ? E 0YY t- 0 kab ° v - m m O m = Q Q, C 0 . ?I to w a 0 0 a7 q' O 4 m r IL `?. ? c 0 r O O N CnD !F C' CD to C) ' - O CD W) A T 0) .?- CD M O N O M V- IT V ? N Cp . co V N r0 04 OD CD h - - C, CO co O m N O O O O O O O COO d ul O M N ti N . - . M r 04 M r CV O CD sf 'ti r N O 0 co co co O 3 co N O O O O O O O a CO co O _O O N O CV M a co N M N 0 ti T N 0 co 00 r- T- N t0 co C" r f? OD N C'')- O O O O O O O. N LO LOO co r O fl- L` co N M O -ate- 04 ti N CD 0 tO M M N 00 O 'T N co OD L? r-- r WI to co to O' N r.- r a r- co co 'Q d. r qq M N CO O c'> M. 9 co O) r CO U) M U) N r to M r CO M C0 -,o- N N m N (?O 00 r- O N Cn0 N N i` "'?t to tn-- ? co - N P- N V) co c T- v N co O (O co O -- O (O N M O :O O to to O, CO N CO M O O O CO CO M N N M O r m ED O m. N 9 CO O cc, CO O O ? N N N O M N CD (D t0 N - O - _? M N; O O O O O O O' m V) M mm p C'S M LO N N r ? c O N O N m N r C tl) CO N r to N N to N F°- o ,, . . ? - Y m m X - Y cD m Y Y o) Y Ycprn ,C e i E ?) E N N ?, N LL 7 = M 0 = M 9 t ?U' m g- j6 cx LL E - y CL a 0, a cx a 6 a ` U O 0) LL M m o CL ti S CL m 5 ? ° a - 0 o a a m pOt = f s t r L _ a) m v Q c m=(o F- a c m U = m s m = ° 0 c as m O ? E •a) 6 • E ? tJJ m ? t ? E U LLI? N ~ Q W - ? L-. O LIJ W 7 to J J O R, . J O a f- U • 0 O L 2 16 ?J (0 O O N L co M C O U N O a` 00 C w 1O Yo (6 0 7 O U m v N r ::E O O M r-- r N M ti to M w N N. N Cl) m m r- to M r r C) N r r r r r r r N O V V n O V to 0 (O V to (0 M O O O O r r r r M r O r0 - ? r r r r- r r r V N .. O C) CD r- co co co CD m 0) CD m CD M CD N O N r O p) C3 M (D CO O O N M M V t-- 0 V tO (U CO (O (O ? r- 1-- R r- M O ti w O O N 0) Cl C6 p M M to r` r- c0 w m m w N V V V V V V tO to V V If) CD, co N co O t` p M V V to (O h h h r- w N t` v N N N N N N N N N M M N N O M O N ? a + 3 r O N co CD tD 00 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) (D m co M N 0 O r .. r N t tO a m ( O M O M ? 0 N M. {O- O ? D a 00 ao t9M Q 0o> co o?, (A N e Al e IL N cc CIA N 04 OM _ .? m Z (D csi It N M > m c C Q O C 0 e e o e e 0 e 0 e o e CO M e e '.V-- o 0 M ° o e e e o e e 0 e O N > U N m? M t O . 0 m ! 0 N O ti co C > C N J co co co P r.. I, n n s` O , m h co a V J a a etS m m ? N a N O P- V p m? co to ull 10 CO 10 O M V to to in N to V 0) r m 3 (? N c > w O O O O O M N O? 03 CD 00) O ) r r r r ? m (0 Q r Z J W 0 0 N N Q r N tM V to CO h CO CD O r N B F Y r r 0 0 0 0 0\° 0 0 lop, \° \° 0 0 !? CO t? O tD O W r O M M (O O (o M r,? O co O N c O N I,- c M (D O O o (o co w t-- fl- t` h t- fl- O O F.- (O O O r 0 (M M M M O O O to c) M M M r` r O 0 r` W ('O M 1- r- O O M M > Q t6 O 0 V oD V to r- M O (0 -M ?t ' ' O to oD o to m (O tO O 0) to O C) O O V O O t O M N N LO O O CD tO m r r r r r M r m J 9 tq w co O (n &0 Q V O W N r-- cq t- co w 00 co °D C:l ,e ev O tD 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 M th r 0 0 N Q N O O co N CD co r CO `-' O to O N O V N O M <-- co V (U to U') O co co N I- (O o N M `t O co 0) (n 0) r O -N oD M 0 w r r r r r r 7 .Q r 0 C; N N N . OD 0) a (O 0) m lD 01 M tq C) m 0) C) a N a O F- O to F- m Q ) 0) O O r r. ? 0) M r N N w C V N u) co C? m O O O N .4 M fl- C%4 N ? e? IL O r r r r p a r ? c R a " 0 O N C? (D V CO (O o) V W (O 1? CD 00 t- V to CD M rl- O M co o N tQ 0 O O) O m O O O O V O a O V C I r r r r r r N ,0 C (A Ul N O V M N r co m m N ? (0 ( r m l0 p _ 01 0) Q) O 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 ( O 0 ; 0 r V V (o Q \ J Op (? to a M to ?- N M V to co r- oD m V Y t co 2 to 0 m C: (D O O N L 2 m 2 U) c O U N O M N E O c W .O w m Q O .a m m r V r (O r O CO OO aD T CD O -OOO O N O- u r ONN t? C) M W .-?• U O O O cM CD 0 MGOOOr M 'q CD M OO N M O Q 1? o BYO M M 0) N p O r r r r r T P T T r T N T _ T T r It 11 N N O T T T N N r- ?- T N N N r r T r r T N N N r T T CU N N r r r r j M N a r O N a n a N (D r U r co co MON (p N N V O (D NOM 1- V I ?-MCO q o O r o' CU a N r (D O0M_M O 'D 'D r- O Om N OD O mh1-- 0 o M A T M r- O r r T r r r r .4f M M r W CO N (D r T -r r r N N r r (O M CO r N O O N 0- r r T r r T r r r r r O O N a r r r r r r r r r r T r T N a T G) U 0 0 0 O r CO) O O T N cM V M r Co N O O CA GO st - o CO O N N U') a T m U M I- T sp GO CO GO M A O (D cD O O co CO O O Cl) O r- O o M O M p O O r T r r r T r r r r r r r r r r r M sf N T GO T T N p O O T T r T T r r T r T r T T T r r T (O q N r V T r r r (V M T C) N a r Co N a a O U `-' U n r (O O O M N GO GO OOh ' ?A r 1- I-NO r 1` O {? 0 1 000 t? r` a 0 m T U Cl) co O N (O N (o Oa" MT M O co N(O CO O M 1- o O? 00 4m CD p) O O O O r r 0 r r T r T T O r(D r T r 7 M N N r T r r r M Cn O O r T T e- T T T r r r r T T O r r' T co M N N V T r T r p N C) N a N a a O m U N(OOMOO 1-tl- O OMOO o a O U N V•CD OOLO fl- W(pM M1-r O ? OO(D I-- M-t -h NV' to co GDO N U O 4) N fl- h O) (O fl- ? CO CO I? M O CO GO Q OOOOOO r T T r r T OOT T T MNNr r T r T co U 000000 T r r T r rOT r r r CA T v N p ` O a C a 04 N ca m MOOOOO M?i 00 V• ON'K N(n M'cl V co o (O Mr v M ca Q V CO 1-OO CO ?' v(OrNt- M(DO •-NO OrIq M o rnOGD v C ? ? co 0 OO 0 0 0 'D r 0 M N N m M n C) 0 0 0 0 0 Co T O ? M T T O N CD p O r r T T r T r r r r r N p m r T T r r r r r (V N I ? a 0 U O O co l1 CA O N T O O O N o O O) ti a 9 U N co M r r' M (` O M 0 O. O O CO c M r CD ? I-- 0 m ?0O)O 000 Mc gO p ??OOiO? 00 ( ONN? (?Q p O T r T r T r T T T 0 p O T r T T r r r r r N a N a m r d X • 't7M 0 N > m ' q 2, 7 tn MMO co M co C4 m t- D co( kD' (C) aj O co O C> 0) a) ( - O O T, tiW OD- to to (m M M: T O U c o O V) O CD O m" O. " 0 O, : CD 0) M r O V c E ? T T T T r r T W p t? f -T T r -r Y T T t^ o w o w 0 QrNM V LO (01,- 00 C) ??N M V n (o r- m C) ? - C14 QTNp IL Mt I 3 CL w, k O C V) 3 c ` O Y- ` c o N a N O > N v J 1C 0 _(D (0-0 m C 7 O to w U? O N (n IL 0 oEtf 3o -U. oE(oo v(n ..- ?p ","- .b., z Q y ], E d? N c(D U V y ?' tf >+ m NTH cm 0 O W T J (+? m N 01 O? m - O O Q z 0 0 p i y c N o y F" ? E Q m Y Q 0 7 i O rn 3 `' c to 1 O Nn 0) (D0> N • t) J _ ?O w o N Mjo m+ Z 3 :3 UP (D V) C o E 6 3 o E co o c N ' m o o o 0) 0 (D 4) (D 0 n V% y M> A _ o (? a m ? a 3 °3? O o C o tz ?o m a > (Doo L ? E am , Y Q 00 3 0 0 L m • • M - (0 1A M M M O O) N O r M 4) U N r M O co h O N N ?-- U N CO t o O p M M O IT V o Go 00 r rN `?T'TNN N --- - toC14 C14 N (D q MM C4 C4 N d N d a -o N U 00300)Oco ? Iq ? COM-M •N- U OO m m NOpD? (07r ~M O O O r r 'q M M r 4) N r r (0 r ? O r r T r r r r 0 ? r r r r N d N d a a r U ^ jj ONt0 MO W N r (p O0 MmM OO(0 MO?tO r U F- (0 Q O M O co m m O r M p- O O O O r r MtT? r p m O O O r U') v0 r O r r r r r r 0 r r r r r r Cl N a N a N a a (tj O OD CD r W M ti r n t` O n 0 r0 M Q) !?. (0 N Cl) LO W n r tp M o ?- m N V O r ? N u n O O O cp M N LO M r 04 LO OD O tT O O m W) Go 0 0) - N o.O0000? O Cl r O V MS N O f N 0) D0)000- -O (OMAN ri C? 0- N d N N C O a a ;' rn N M V) O r r- co t0 M 00 O p O m m O my OODOt-- MIt IhN V WODWW0 to O O UO)'m-cn C) 0)tpO? ?OV co MOMONI?m r-- cn -O O -O O O O O O O O O M N N o r 00 O) M 0 0 r O r "T M N a a pr 0 0 r rrr ---- ° `t O d N OD _0 OD co ..-. O ULo tiOOOU') ID C4 MIT V' (0 e 'o O Ornco V M(OO) OD tiIT M \° ti Iq C'C f O EM V (0M h tD n U- to N P LO (00) 0 00 ao O •0 p O to 0 a c) O O a) r 0 M p 0 0 0 0 0 O O M '0t N 0 r r r r r r r p L N N C Q a w m 9 U? ? GO (O ? O LO N r LO C) C l o 9 m M r- U') M co O O 00 m CD 0 OD M V' N r 0 0) M C o U h t N M r M m m N i o m m LO O P N N p ?tA 0OriOO? OOO 'c!'MMO st (0 Cl ??O W MOB OOO LO N co (0 p `O r r - r r r O 0 0 m 0) r r r r r r C ? (V Q 04 a 3 ? ? O 3 W + ?, to m ._ U 3too)MOmm NM 0) -CO 'CIO W 4) 9 Q jtpMMOto O ?{ hm t-0) m ' 00 c +0) C O 1r tQM(4jO co.O to CD OO r M rO L 3 to (0O MO OOvM- V) c0O Q t t71 m w- O 0) _T3 Q1. r-- r r ?- r r r 0 m E O QJ -- W ?:.0 r r r r r' _U C 04 < 1 v. O V 3 N 0 U m e V \° o IL o C7 ° w [.L r N M "r U-) co t- co 0) r0 er- O 0 p r N Cl) v LO (0 n co 0) r0 C y0 a Cl) Y IL m ?o = 'a-c a ?o m OL I m o co c a .r j\ y m0 > (ao m c m . o _m m m moo 4?'i (n v°',0 Z' m J O w (0 C O J O ff. co - (0 c Z O o y O) m U m c N m 0 'a 3^ 3 Z) Q. C N ??> tcg? gEo a c`? mm o E 0 m 0E(a0 (Loot 3?oE4oo °? hoc a? Z a c o m m> N E V m t m c m y 0 >. o to I'S N 0 tf (0 N o Z O to m m r m V ( 0 u 40 0) tf m 4) Q` 4i m m an d a)(6 h Q V N m N m a) (0 ° C J to m o m m ?(o C Op to m 43? O m? ?N O O O O m r J m o ma ? oa a? m `" Na ?'oa (D u ?r m v :3 4- Oa QZy° ?? j° to Hzy° C c ? E am a, Y? oo ? ? ? E am a, Y? Uo ? m N 0 • 53 m Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey 0 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/01 March, 2006 • is SINGLE FAMILY Development Name Unitsi Parcels Current Occupancy To e Occupied Ashley Avenue 12 12 0 Bent Tree 20 20 0 Berkshire Crest 31 31 0 Berkshire Glen 95 95 0 Berkshire Glen Phase 2 98 98 0 Bifrost Gate 52 52 0 Canterberry Crossing 20 20 0 Carrin ton Meadows 56 56 0 Count Green 22 22 0 Crystal Court 13 13 0 Crystal Meadows 27 27 0 Dawson Hills 6 5 1 Dennison Park 11 11 0 Dorrie Lane 16 16 0 Jornada 94 94 0 The Junction 49 49 0 Kelli Meadows 8 g 0 Kendall Heights 31 31 0 Kingsley Meadows 56 51 5 Lakeland: Ashton 54 54 0 Lakeland: Ashton Phase 2 102 102 0 Lakeland: East inte 80 80 0 Lakeland: East inte Div 2 66 66 0 Lakeland: Evergreen 49 49 0 Lakeland: Evergreen, Div 213 102 102 0 Lakeland: Montiano 104 104 0 Lakeland: Tuscan 76 76 0 Lakeland: Verona South 400 387 13 Lakeland: Verona North 181 75 106 Lakeland: View Ridge South 74 74 0 LeeAnn Meadows 23 23 0 McDonnel Estates 6 6 0 Peasle Ride 54 54 0 River Park Estates 18 18 0 Royal Hills Division 1 49 49 0 Royal Hills Division 2 33 33 0 Soos Creek Vista 10 10 0 Summerfield Estates 40 40 0 Swansons Flat 21 21 0 Valle View Estates 8 8 0 Vintage Hills Division 6 61 61 0 Vintage Hills Division 7 20 20 0 Vistara 2 38 33 5 Washington National Div 1 42 32 5 Willow Park The Ridge-Ph 2 47 47 0 2410 1 1351 Elem Middle HS Total 0 1 1 2 17 6 10 33 10 5 9 24 49 29 27 105 45 17 18 80 24 18 12 54 10 2 3 15 23 11 10 44 24 10 1 35 10 5 3 18 16 8 3 27 3 2 1 6 5 4 5 14 2 2 4 8 21 8 14 43 18 8 18 44 0 0 2 2 18 5 10 33 12 11 8 31 25 8 8 41 28 19 25 72 17 10 12 39 11 5 12 28 22 8 7 37 26 8 11 45 18 5 6 29 25 12 11 48 53 31 34 118 14 6 8 28 16 12 14 42 3 2 5 10 1 2 2 5 11 8 15 34 4 1 4 9 9 6 8 23 7 3 4 14 1 1 1 3 9 6 4 19 15 3 1 19 3 2 0 5 21 11 12 44 6 3 1 10 8 1 1 10 2 7 1 10 42 21 22 85 704 353 388 1445 Student Generation Factors 0.301 0.151 0.166 0.6175 48 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/01 March, 2006 Developments to be completed prior page Additional Students 41 20 22 83 • Alder Meadows 30 1 29 Aspen Meadows 21 1 20 Hazel Park 15 5 10 Lakeland: Vista Heights 125 4 121 River inte 118, 4 114 Marchini Meadows 83 18 65 2006 Auburn Place 14 0 14 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 0 76 River Rim 12 0 12 Sera Monte 33, 0 33 I IOtt ( 759( 2007 and uo Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 Backbone Ride 7 0 7 Beaver Meadows 60 0 60 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 Brandon Place 78 0 78 Cambridge Pointe 26 0 26 Dal'it Dhaliwal Plat 8 0 8 Estes Park 31 0 31 Hansen Development 31 0 31 Ha reet Kan 8 0 8 Hazel View 20 0 20 Kendall Ride 109 0 109 Kent Impound Area 386 0 386 Kersey 3 Project 373 0 373 Lawson Place 14 0 14 Little Fields 8 0 8 Mystery Heights 6 0 6 New Hoe Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 Pacific Meadows 44 0 44 Plemmons Development 8 0 8 Vintage Place 25 0 25 Willow Place 18 0 18 I 73b$ ( 13681 9 5 5 19 6 3 3 13 5 2 2 9 38 19 21 77 36 18 20 73 25 13 14 51 118 59 65 242 4 2 2 9 7 4 4 15 23 11 13 47 4 2 2 7 10 5 5 20 48 24 26 98 9 5 5 19 4 2 2 9 2 1 1 4 18 9 10 37 17 8 9 34 23 12 13 48 8 4 4 16 2 1 1 5 9 5 5 19 9 5 5 19 2 1 1 5 6 3 3 12 33 16 18 67 116 58 64 238 112 56 62 230 4 2 2 9 2 1 1 5 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 5 13 7 7 27 2 1 1 5 8 4 4 15 5 3 3 11 412 206 227 845 • • 49 • +-' O U L ? Cl) Q) Q U c 01-- 0,5 ?y O C7 c L C Q ? O • oe 0 0 N t to F O O co I- ?t O v O (o N CD O d' tO LO ? (o CA LO q cM M Co M r- N to 0 f- O - r- r- O r N c- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O rn tO M tO co r 'T N ?/? VJ LO N t? c- It .- I l0 N M O r- qT co 00 co c,^M to _ x- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m CD CD tO co U-) 0o 00 co (o O UO O O M d N M N M (A T- N I- t-- 14t OV 'q 'L7 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 E O u-) co 0) tO N LO co co I-_ O O tO o0 d' 00 00 M m f- N F-- 'T (A O M OD CD M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O O O O O O O +?+ O N O O N ? O N 14T O M M tON r- f ' r = N M •- LO It N ?O m tOC) m T O M M q7 N r- r-- It co 0 CD LO IO V C4 O M M Co"T W .a 02 L W C .? 0 0 0 0 0 IT 0 0 0 IV ? V 0 = C W co M CD CN CV) I- 00 7 ?-' (D (0 0) N 0) - q (A CO V v V 0 d i CC) 0D 0) IT 00 ' Co w m N C )rZ w ?a ?- r r r co a c 0 0 c . o c CD 3 a ? Y E E m I- o Q ?° c 0 m 0 0 o c U E c o z 0 3 L 0 0 a (? 0 ? ? +.? C O -0 CO O m (D . - N 0 ca c m m U U- = ? tA Q j ) 0 c c c c c 3 - LL co cv co cu ca o m O Y Y Y Y . 32 w D U J J J J J ? a. > J LL J C co O O N ti O O N _T cQ E O L C O Z N U O .O D. 0 to • Policy/Text Amendment #2 Kent School District Updated 2006-07 to 2011- 2012 Capital Facilities Plan. Incorporate Kent School District Updated 2006- 07 to 2011-2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Kent School District Board of Directors. June 28, 2006.) • 0 IIIIIAi MeIiITIEI p 2006- 2007 2011-2012 • ?$CNooL 01311110T Nei 41 Emerald Park Elementary School Serving 2lnincorporated7Ung County 1§sidents .And Residents of the Cities of • Kent, Covington, Auburn, OCacklDiamond, Waple Valley, Renton, andSeaTac, Washington Api i12006 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary 111114 FACILITIES P 2006 - 2007 - 2011-2012 SeNOOL OISMICT NQ, 41? Emerald Park Elementary School Serving 2lnincorporated 9 ng County Residents AndRWents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Audurn, (BCackDiamond, 911apfe Valfey, Rgnton, and-SeaTac, Washington • Apri[2006 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary W Kent SC11001 81 12033 SE 256"' Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 - 2007 - 2011 - 2012 1A XENTI Lls_xlc? BOARD of DIRECTORS • Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Lisa Holliday Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. - Superintendent Fred H. High - Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. -Assistant Superintendent for Leaming & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney - Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Janis Bechtel - Executive Director, Kentlake & Kentwood Strand Merri Rieger - Executive Director, Kent-Meridian & Kentridge Strand Donald Hall - Executive Director of Information Technology John Knutson - Executive Director of Finance Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Kem school nistrict f A fKENT? Iii; HI?C?i ! SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 - 2007 - 2011- 2012 April 2006 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fosjord, Purchasing Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker • • Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 i Kent school ¦ Sim Tear Capitaf Facifities Phan Ta6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 I I I District Standard of Service g I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools I 1 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Executive Summary • This Six-Year Capital Facilities plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2006 for the 2005-2006 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) 0 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 2 Executive Summary (continued) • • The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,809.38. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2004, full head count was 27,573. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college-only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to Management Act, this Plan will be updated schedules adjusted accordingly. which demonstrates the District's the requirements of the Growth annually with changes in the fee Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.41 % of 21,778 King County live births in 2001 is forecast for 1,832 students (916 FTE @ .5) expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2006. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.41% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six- year period. (see Tabte 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") and non-disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with alternative funding for the second half of the day. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of SeaTac, Renton & Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city limits of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 4 0 1 1 Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .444 Middle School .148 Senior High .252 Total .844 Multi-Family Elementary .293 Middle School .058 Senior High .094 Total .445 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,746 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. I"1 LJ Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 5 0 c m J rn m co J OD W C m J Off c m J O?1 m J 0) m J >- Y w O m U) J T i l'7 V O Z Z W m (~} j w c N Z m Q W rn a J W s m O = U: co) N CO) m N w F- a J Y W m m J 0 v O co J I, m rn e m J _0 c m J co c m N r m J It m J P pp o 0 r N N co h o O co Cl) N ( C6 N O W CO Lo N O N co C', co Cl N 06 M o ? .Q o N N co 00 N N oD O O O C? N co O 0 M C"i m N N co co o G M M N co N 0 O V N co O 0 M O N 06 .- o ? N n v N . O o 00 O o O O N O) O o O LC, O v C N O O) o O v o O) ? O N o 00 CO (i co CP r CID m N ? N Om) N r m o CD p > m m N C 4) U C O W W ? C C Y Y M w N "Cr O v O M f- M O O O M m (D N O 0 O 6) (O r- O) f` ` a00 O Co N N N N N N r O N v O O r` N m M O IT ti to O O M N O Cl C0 v N O Cl IT O) to O O r N N ? ? m 1 •- r N (V N N N N N N r O N CY) I_ r- Co M O) O O h fl- to O O O O O W (D O O Go 0) to O O N N M Cl) N P- v M r r r N N N N N N N r O N l N to O M O O O Q O M O V* C ) N M O to v Cl " O OD O i O C +--- ? O R OD Q M N N N N N N N N r O N tf) r- C) co m (14 IT LO M to o LO ? a M M M O O O O O N ? N O co Iq M r N N N N N N N N N r O N O O 00 (O CO co M co Cl) O N co O O _ O O Lc) O M O O O N N O N r n 'T N N N N N N N N N N N r O N O) OD N f` 6) O N O N f` O N O _ N Cl) _ (O v fA ? O O O r- (p 0 r N N N N N N N N N r O N v to O O co O Cl) O O M O N N O to O) O v O v (O P- N O Q M OD N O O O N C) O O O) O O) co co M . N tV N (V N N N r r r r N O v co IT Cl) (O N O fl- f- h O N % OD O O CO N Cl) co Cl) M P- O O co I - a7 C) O O O O O) O) O) O) pl O O -N N N N N N r r r r r N cm m N 0 N CO) 10 rn ? t 0 M o) N to O O to O C rn o rn rn rn co ao (7) ) 0 rn co co v v n N r N r r r r r r r r _ N It) r a) 0 M O f- U) r N 0) N IT 0) t 0 O M N W O) O O O O O O O) oD f? CO V M r N r N -7 .-- r r r r r -7 M N f? n O N O O (O N O O O) O O LC CO M (O IT O r IT co O O) N co 0) ) O O Co O O O C t0 O (O N M rl? .- r .- r r .- r r r r r N f? W N M P- O O) (D t0 f` O M O 0 0 ? 0 O O O N 6 f O) ? ? (Q IQ M M N N r .- .- r .- r r .- r N N O O O O r (O N M M O O N N N m O O r CD _ N CO (O O M N co O O O O) m 0) co t>D n (O co tY N N N r r .- r r .- r r .-- r N N O Q O co O Cl) O co N O O O N O) V V t0 to M N N r 00 O O M O) O O O OD h f` 0 co V V N r r r r r r r r r r r N N M v m N O) R O M O O N O O 0 O N N O) O N N IT co (O co O 0 0 OD n Go f- f- (O (D O M N ?- r r r r- r r r r r r N ) C C m E V r N M sr O 0 fl- co O Co a-- ? o CD r - C m d m (u m m (U m a? a) a? (u W a ? a a ? a a -a a s a -a ? m N m Co ( 6 co m m m m m co R 0 ` W ? (7 t0 _N N to N a (o e W O CL r_ c r m c to m U N cc d C T = M T O O N m Cm W E c w? m O m O O m 7 E N r N to to W m c C C co :3 n N - p m O V a T L l> > C N O d) O C r y co nco o u pom L6 4) E d O U C m W :3 O O C T Of V) N a C o vi W m d) w a M 0 o N Y v 'c a OD I.- n - t r LL m m U ?O V) O d T W m m d 'm = ? c (O to L) C v ? a m = m d Y O C m ? .C Y 0) 0 N m m 0 0m a U') a 16 Q O L U N N C r m c 07 0 ? m m Qi a 1) x E m = D O at) LL N O co V) E 0 W ri O C C O W ?[ O t n 0 u W (h 3 `?) c O 1) -) a N W c 0) co O L j r C U LL (V am C U ca O C Y m ca W N m N Ol .C (D H rn rn ? ? ? c U 4) 0 m U m 3 a r N = m n m C m m 7 d () CD N 0 C N v y m c E a C C E D O p W N O E c N F- C 7 W m fi is m c (7 n ?. j (1f N N N O m j UL H Q. 0 } U - N .o t0 W III CL 0 O N Q r IP C (0 a d U O LL m CL ((1 U m } U H U m aci Y KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION • ACTUAL P R O J E C T 1 O N October 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 King County Live Births' 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,874 23,100 23,200 Increase/Decrease 480 -709 85 568 443 226 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.41% 8.41% 8.60% 8.60% 8.59% 8.60% 8.59% 213 Kindergarten FTE @.5 943 916 940 964 983 993 997 Grade 1 1,938 2,003 1,961 2,012 2,063 2,103 2,124 Grade 2 1,981 1,975 2,056 2,013 2,065 2,117 2,157 Grade 3 1,962 2,019 2,028 2,110 2,066 2,119 2,172 Grade 4 2,024 1,976 2,048 2,057 2,139 2,095 2,148 Grade 5 2,090 2,066 2,033 2,106 2,115 2,198 2,154 Grade 6 2,164 2,162 2,151 2,117 2,192 2,201 2,287 Grade 7 2,200 2,226 2,250 2,238 2,203 2,281 2,290 Grade 8 2,293 2,249 2,300 2,325 2,312 2,276 2,356 E Grade 11 1,799 1,841 1,866 1,942 1,917 1,956 1,977 Grade 9 2,767 2,857 2,827 2,887 2,917 2,901 2,856 Grade 10 2,173 2,173 2,268 2,240 2,286 2,310 2,297 Grade 12 1,475 1,391 1,448 1,463 1,521 1,502 1,532 Total FTE Enrollment 25,809 25,854 26,176 26,474 26,779 27,052 27,347 Note: 213 14 Yearly Increase 39 45 322 298 305 273 295 Yearly Increase % 0.15% 0.17% 1.25% 1.14% 1.15% 1.02% 1.09% Cumulative Increase 39 84 406 704 1.009 1,282 1,577 Full Time Equivalent (FTE 25,809 25,854 26,176 26,474 26,779 27,052 27,347 '. Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the Distticfs percentage of King County live births. 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. 4 Oct. 2005 P223 FTE is 25,809 & Headcount is 26,970. Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,573. IG R O W T H P R O J E C T 1 0 N S - Adjustments for current economic factors * For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2006 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" 0 In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also ',. incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI - Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) 0 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior-disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC-DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten (Magnet K Programs) Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Leaming Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (contd.) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Learners (E L L) Science Programs & Labs - Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs - Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs - Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts - Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science - Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc. Business Education - Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DECA, Sales & Marketing, etc. Material Sciences - Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machine Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic & Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 1 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. ?J Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 10 • I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,824 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,345. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes. It has also been updated to estimate new capacity for building additions at the high schools. It includes preliminary capacity for Mill Creek Middle School which re-opened in the fall of 2005. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview Elementary) serves grades 1 through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2005-2006 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 428 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -1 80th Avenue SE, Covington 9 8042 480 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE . 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 480 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 490 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11600 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fairwood Elementary - - 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 420 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 490 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 480 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 428 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 468 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 466 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 538 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 492 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 442 Panther Lake Elementary _ 1938 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 384 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 498 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 540 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 418 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 440 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,314 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 929 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 775 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 841 Meridian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 910 Mill Creek MS (former Kent Jr Hi) 2 2005 i 1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 768 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 935 Sequoia Middle School 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 832 Middle School TOTAL 5,990 Kent-Meridian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,803 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,812 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,302 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,187 Senior High TOTAL 8,104 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 27 824 , Chan es to ca it fl g pac y re ect program changes and new building additions at high schools. 2 Kent Junior High was closed for 2004-05 for remodel and re-purpose. It re-opened in 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School . 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 1-12. The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementary. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2006 Page 12 L z m °U of v? 0 C ° - .} q C ?> N "0 C1 ° o ° =.?° O,m O .? a V ?- ,? ?, .... UV° V Cn v U U try c U 0 3E• I T W yS aAV 41041 ya 0O o° -0-6 >o 00 oE• 33u m vm fm CW J 62 o U_ O1? D2 c im mE o0 • o yo N _ [ `cm -L Nm Up yN •? O E. ?'mU O W= 3S-V ? m 0- -0 ow g N• um• m? CL CVO Y pO EU m O ? w DC y= CL •?m t m ?m mE• ` w y Era C N W S 3S aAV k4901 • o : n O? rom mm• cm C [ N a_ w v, z N m ? m a H N W L ? L 01U = o m 0o 0 m> o° m= 02 • ® of >m• 13 o` '00 m yy C 0 3m U • mm Cm` p c> o • ym? mu o- H L U Op Up m C m ?E [H 00 OL 3y w um •W O? mt A`d 4109 t L E v O ?/ N m N ? 3 > y 06 p °m > N mE •6 ?m •W 0E N om N 2W was t o E - 3S a^b cL 0 ? [ O C ] tv) m • m m [ ?'p • c0?j ` ?[ fw ?> m f NW V S • c a? > 0 V 3 r 0E • C • o 00 - E r m • ` 750 •om ? , m • u E "'O Ow ? _? > E mo 3S aAV 41vO1 L• • Yt2 0 0 ` o m = 0 w m V m mm ?E UV Um ='O nw c G< • eAV P4u90 WA AGM • m? m y O[ ' )E ?F Ab 0 e" goo K y?E y3 00 ? • p m o E i mL Om L L3N ?W ? 2D_ ? ]C= ?W [ yU 0 L c vWi ?\ _N ?d a) 0 v a) U Q Q Q Q m L -C -C > Co cn cn o i L L C C== QQ a) Q Q -.- C: C C: W -)u, C Co 1\ V Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 13 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2006, the following projects are i completed or in the planning phase in the District: • Additions to three high schools have added capacity for students from new development and 9t' Grade students moving to the high schools. Voters recently approved funding for further classroom capacity to be added at Kentlake and Kent-Meridian High Schools. • Reconfiguration to 7t' and 8"' grades provides additional capacity at middle schools. The Board has approved renovation and re-configuration of Sequoia Middle School to serve as an Alternative High School in 2007-08. • Kent Junior High was temporarily closed for one year in 2004-05 for re-purpose and remodel. In 2005, the school was renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School (# 7a) with a new 7 h Grade Technology Academy program. The voters have recently approved funding for Phase II of the renovation of Mill Creek MS. • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future new Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 16. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. County and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull- outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Tabie 4) Voter approved bond issues for $105.4M in 1990 and $130M in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. • Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 l SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 SE 286th Street & 124th Ave. SE, Kent Elementary City of Covington Elementary King County TBD 2 City of Covington Elementary King County Secondary King County Elementary King County TBD 2 King County TBD 2 King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16. Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26. ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) To be rebuilt on current site Replacement Planning 2009 500 25% Elementary # 31 (Funded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2010 500 100% Elementary Site (Unfunded) i To be determined 2 Site Planning 2007 500 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 -832 to Alternative High School SENIOR HIGH Classroom additions at three High Schools Kent-Meridian for growth & reconfiguration (Funded) Kentridge Kentwood Sequoia Middle School Alternative High School (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent Classroom additions at two high schools (F) Kentlake & Kent-Meridian L TEMPORARY FACILITIES Relocatables For placement as needed L SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Meridian High School # on 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Additions Utilized 2004-06 386 75% Additions Utilized 2004-06 1,000 75% Additions Utilized 2004-06 896 75% Renovation Planning 2007-08 500 75% Additions Planning 2007/2008 -200 75% Additional Capacity New Planning 2006 + 24 - 31 each 100% New Planning TBD 2 N/A Land Use Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.) 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site) 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2006 Page 15 L 0 m V o? '0 .? m m r 30 N ?? _? D N a mr m O n N Ca •V 3om •t- O a _ Dh Vjw o L ° ez U Y2 w I _ =vVi Q ?n V m D m> C • oa c°0 0 6 0 -D? J`c m mt Cn co pE Y A) D6 °m C • Of mw Y i 3m U ? mE gy C> h m. o? ` ?ym o mU c N ? - ED ? E (?jm °C W Um ?A m a 2V W '0 > C CEO O DDO • 0 O © 22 Lmp • d mm? OL m 0 ?2 D?R ODE w o m o r 3S aAV 41b9t C O c ° w Z'O o vy 30• >® C o p? mE N °CC Vw Ym 0 > .Dm > Dw -'? o ?i? L ?E • C N Cm W C C 3S aAV LWvL E m O uwi ?n N• OE o _m UD yt •W H =w CDC m m m 0 m- 3S aAV PUZ£ L C_ E` 3S aAV PUZ£ t D D > 02 a0 Um• 60 ° o c© mo me =N• Y of aim ??m om ?E m . m c moo m® >o- ?m E C m o mE > •Pt Y= 0Otnw 410 ??niaJ ?C® ?" ?? cm > c aa o> _ EU -6 aw ° ?jm c aE? L? Z Q ° 06 E W mm U _C m 02 0.L1 m Er. w UE• mm am ?? N mv ym 'E 3S aAV 44901 a w M O w 0 Y D o° o `m m = > `c o 0 3S aAV 44x01 .0 C• fE = my=L? gym Cm 0?3 C Y? U C CE Dw Dm o m fn ?> a wEy? =0 (\ H Wmm Um h u'v mE Nm w !a/ aAV P4000 Z 7 N O?7 • a L? u` ADM4&H ?ailDn iSaM m> m0 h [II° YC r Uc m 3 m E E w m OR Ds? zw C> oE C 0 -0 ro° Ke Y?Q • S alO?SJalV4 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 16 F- r-I L A • n u n lJ V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term 'portables" and the more descriptively accurate tens, 'relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Aom?"s AS call Based on amendment projections, pregram capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does Trot anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will he replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the rebcatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. • Portables, or rebcatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the used Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan prefects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between rebcatables, emerging technologies and educational restmctunng will continue to be be examined. • Kern saws omrn SmYee, rasiw rm?nlsvm? "I20ne Peso 17 V 11 Projected Six-year Classroom Capacity • As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (sea 1anee5a5a.ece„e?19-22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The And school day of October is recognized as the 'enrollment count date" for the year. Full Time Equivalent (HE) student enrollment for October 1, 2005 was 25,809.38 which represents an increase of 39 HE over the previous October. Kindergarten students are counted at.5 and P223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College-only Running Start students. (see TWes 5&5Aac m,p s(g-22) On October 1, there were 586 students in 11"' and 12"' grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 315 of these students attended classes only at the college ('college-only) and are thus excluded from the FTE and • headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons.. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2005 totals 27,573 which includes ECE and cellege-only Running Start students. This reflects an increase of 233 actual students compared to October 1, 2004. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (see Tm 5 am rawa s nac on Fages 19 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables aM/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary charges, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different pans of the District. • KlM Slm Msm s.-vee, Canmi racnuoa Ptah n M moa Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY • TOTAL DISTRICT Permanend P am Capac'llyn 24,767 27824 27924 2],2]8 27,328 27,828 28,328 Changes an Permanent Ca aGly r Clanaganna Mine It 3 anal sewvs (F) ollt,Meddal emgram Gaxiry 2282 Co"naurn aeeemns a Wmiene s KeFOa un (F) 15g 50 mr. rmwalmad rzmmiyaeJ as ulemenve Man awul n]gg]a5 by ceyedN -832 wph Saba ay mCa MS amN wn Fsabananal x Mai gi?aem.l wpnreavenmas snloeekwneleswad.fliesruxgyneeeeriyzFa In Feu mos reehmem WVrcvM1 Uev T/5 Repa¢ngnl with IruraxPo epetiN Irt Panora lake Ekm maly (Funded) 364 500 • ElemaJelyp 31 1Milden 500 MW,, epee Sau l 2],024 2],824 2],2]8 2],328 2],820 28,328 28.328 Inlenm Rebgkbk Ce w nnPaxn.cawar San" 0 0 8 24 0 0 0 Mean Fannon cp.wa.y.m 9 0 9 9 0 a o aavhy?gmausoneayam?ru 124 186 0 0 0 0 0 124 166 0 24 0 a a TOTAL CAPACITY' 2],948 28,010 Z1,2]8 2],352 2],820 28,328 28.328 Treap.lEc 0 25,809 25854 28.1]6 264]4 26,]]9 2],052 2734] 2,139 2,158 1,102 8]8 1,p49 1,2]8 901 r claim k eased m saumam m xwn Fan Manama o{acN era Madood vaneidN m reMa na w a g ram ngm. E- FUI Take E(lnealae EmoYmml 1te. 12 Pay NiMerganen seam-5). Fall2g A, aheode maven Ie IM ngeaahml5 na i aModej naeaae] sapetilya!tag6e Saiml lave, • =Sequoia Mitl9e5FMd MII IR reloaded and reaw(gureP aS an AgemaWe High 3chwl in 2007-06 I.Mak Salml roolureen Fell30osevlne iamoionypoaemyxeivlry ]mgnaxlWennhon olM raervnua?eax. a 3WS20g51gal tlavsroomnelaaUenyavetlly¢1.315. xea awe henna su-Yea1 Gavial Fanilmw Man Table 5 ' Anal mm age 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECT ED ENROL LMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 • SCHOOL YEAR 10aSSlLS AL&3oW Jill 1 EW4Mre 2p 2010 20163011 MlI 2013 nrwal P R O J E C T E D Senior Higb Permanent Ca acTy' 5,822 8.104 S'lod 8]54 Send; 6,604 8.804 CM1an b Hi b $cllu0l Ca ac Classrooms added at 6ree high school (Funded) KongMoment - Kenmge ` KenMgM Esemared Pool wpauy 2,282 Atlematire High Stl1wl added through remofguation Of Sequree Wage School for 2007-06 (F( Esh,Owdpumfue paah. 500 Classroom auditors at Kanllke High Stlwol(F) 100 Classrown addieuria at Kent Mennen High Schwool (F) SO flar ll 8,104 8,104 8,754 8,801 8.801 8,804 R804 ReIO•aUae capxv gequhae' 124 185 0 0 0 0 0 TOTnl CAPACITY' 8226 am 6,754 8.804 6,604 8,604 a,604 Fi[ExgputnEx7/Frew[cPONa 8214 8,262 8,409 8.532 6,641 8,669 8,662 SURPWS(DEFICIT)CPPACITY 14 26 345 272 163 135 142 umear Of Pulwmeles Afgmme 4 6 0 0 0 Sm2 RWa a,s uaed br d,fooe, ano poemm prMoeos 0 0 ' WCaciym bused on standard g service for mognm capariy and updated uarudlcaM to Meng Program changes. o FTE= Agamarate Full Time Equenalent Enrollment, exdudinO College-only Running Start students, e Grade level recontigunglen -AII 920 grade nudenes moved to the high scheobs in Fall 2004 . • Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reaonbented as an Atematrve High School in 2007-08. Kam Selma olldd S'.. -rear CnPel Fadaeas Plan Table 5A "2006 Pope 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY • MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEA?- Mltltlle SCMd Parmanenl Capaci 5,215 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 5150 Cre S to Mltltlle SCMd Ca c ° Mill Geak Middle SawL Fart Junlor Man reaperad as MIA Creek Mltltlle asset Via in Fell A05 Pngram rzpeNy wa l 775 °mal Middle S Awl wallW remn0al as an Wlemapve Ho Sender, 20m be Fngmm deanry Mline ? 11"d 10 hill chnad 832 aWbul 5,990 5,990 5.158 5,158 51158 5,158 5,158 • RelccaNMe Capac Rey ue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CgPgCITT'° 5,990 5 g5 5158 5,158 5158 5,158 FIRE EIRCYLU rci/PFat[CnOrv 44,493 4,475 4,550 4,id, 4,5154 557 4,848 SURPLUS (DEFICIT CAPACITY lager 1$15 fA8 595 843 E01 512 No CNSnrcm Pabzrears repulmn at qy time. adds, Rebmunal users for dasarmn eN grynm pupoxa. Cad,whais naaeaonstandard0fa ,rv forgogmmma aly,M uphdellplassewaylo Mkdprogramchanaes. r FTE-g rm,mate Ful TMe Equivalent EnMt ent/Prge m a Grade level rewnGgmalion- All g h grztle slWet mwatl to me high scbaJS In Fall 2004. ° MITI Creek Middle Scbwl a Technology Academy- Kent Junior High was renomad and regpenetl in Fall 2W5 wIN a In chrwlryy Academy serving 7N grader students from all service areas. • ° Still Middle BCFwl will be rermvated antl remnlgmed as an Altemalive High Stlwol in 2007-08 and middle sehnd bwndanea win be rewnfigured for su meddle schools dlsmcm when a,M 6Adsd Paid s. Year Main zolme, Plan Table 5B Ppn13006 mars, 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR xdszoos xpszmT zmT.zme 20013,2009 crossdld zdrpzdnr zall.zdlz xwal P R O J E C T E D Elements Permanent Capan ' 13,314 13,730 13,730 13.366 13,366 13,866 14,366 Kent Mountain View Academy a 416 Chan es to Elements Cenci Replacement with increased Maturity bar Farther Lake Elatrentary (par a 364 500 prematurity #31 IFlis 500 Supdal 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,356 14,356 Relatable Capadry Required' 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 . TOTAL CAPACITY ° 13,730 13,730 13,366 13.390 13,866 14,366 14,355 [TF ErvgaLMErrt1TMlEC1rorv 3 13,102 13117 13,217 13379 43,623 13,326 14,039 SURPW3 DEFICIT CAPACITY 62B 613 149 11 243 540 327 XxMerd nHeWLlez Repuvztl 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Oee Gaurocm flebatn We rwlurtat n Y W a09.5mme gebutepks u.? la clasvmm an4 g03ram pugmes. ' Lanni is based an maneare m servk, for program mvaciy and is updated periodlcaly W reflect prup2m charges. 1 KeMWrou 4n Vim Amdemykaspeclmip mmarthetum rGraMU SC lservirg dentsinG?st-12. The stlml WAdirg (fpmeM li teaming Car ler8 Contains Elem.)wes deagned as an ekmen sryschool. s FTE=Approdmate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @5&excluding ECE) Kinderyaden projection is at 5 FIE aMOUgh rtpA schwls provide Full Day K'mdegaden with atlemadve funding. r Panther Lake Elementary will case bar two years and be rebuilt on the edsling site war incychand capacity e ' • Site selection for Elennntary #31 is pending review of hl rm and capacMneeds. K.n iii Di S, Y14, Cepial Fix Twee Pm, Table 5C Awu core Pad, 22 0 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2006 - 20D7 through 2011 - 2012. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Ad and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Ad. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state furs ing formula. Millennium Elementary 430 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the Diana, Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction am Improvements in February 2002. This partially funded building additions at three high schools which candidate! with moving 9°i grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received state matching funds and has utilized impact fees for the senior high school add'dions. • In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity to be rebuilt on its current site, construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth, Phase II renovation for Mill Crack Middle School, and renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-06. Construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at the high school level. Some impact fees will be utilized for all new construction. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impadfees. For the SixYear Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cast basis. n U Kent 6tlml D6pYJ 5h-Vera Caplbl FaaMl Plan g iP 21306 Pa, 23 ig Vn FU M? ?LL O? W6 N} Y% o n o ? s ? ? ? !lag s s .s a ? ? S h € ? ? # 6 $ w 9 .. w g o o S $ $ e a $ 0 g 0 o a m r o ? o o - n o < ? ? ? . . N ?°g - e ? R $a 3 a _ E 1 0 ry ? L 0 ? m -2 w n ? X ? 8 vo o p ? o ? R ? ? ? ? a ? o ? a g - 9 ? ? m? 0 ? i 9 p x _n „ ? Y 8 & 8 x g . . ` $ s a - ?. .. ? 3 s g 8 ? Y a ? _ s ? Y _ ? e - ' s ? ? s 8 n ? ' $ Y s S a s • VIII Finance Plan- Cost Basis Summary • For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with inflation factor, and projected cost of the nest elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost m [Millnn ost of Elemenfary1/31 in 2010 $18,000,000 • Construction cast of the additions to high schools' High School Additions Projected Cost Total Kent-Me $11300,000 entlake L $6,000,000 _ _ entritlge $16,650,000 toKen?d ent d $14,850,000 cast of addittions to choo ls __ $48800000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cast is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment for 2006 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-tern commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming • support of Initiative 695. Kell Stl n¢NC15&-Yem Capl9 F1061s5 Plan P 112006 Page 25 C Y on= ?u3 y?0 Oa• Nud iin9 Y a' wE ? n w w `? n w n s @gam$= S $ w a m 6 m S ° S g & 8 g ry S 3 c E _ - ? a E E _ 3 U' Y w E w E $ ` 3 e a ?a m s a e ? - s A °s a e s a S? n 2 ? e ? € 3 ? a a z - d g V x s r n 2 _ y S w e d' ? n ? E m 8 & i ? i a a R , a ? d m F i 3 k n 5 ? J 3 @ _ _ A e H n E 8 LA KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student General Factors -MUl&Famiy • Elementary (Grades K-8) 0444 Elementary 0.293 MiddreSCinal (Grades] -8) 0.148 Middle School 0058 Senior High (Grades 9-12) 0252 Senior High 0094 Total 0844 Total 0445 Pmjmted Student Capacity OSPI- Square Footage per Student Elementary 500 Elementary 90 Middle School 1,065 Middle School 117 Senior High 1,000 Senior High 130 Steered Education '44 Required Site Acreage Par Facility Financially (requireng 11 Average She Cost/Acre Middle School( required) 21 Elementary $108,091 Senior High( required) 32 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 New Facility Construction Coal Elemanlary' $18,000,0000 Temporary Facility Capacity B Call Middle Served SO Elementary @ 24 $97000 Senior High- $46.800,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 See wt ware on PB_ 25 Senior High @ 31 $97,000 • Temporary Facility Square FOOlage State Match Craig Elementary 71,652 Conant Slate Me" Percentage 55.94% Middle Coal 27,W0 Senior High 20272 Total 4% 116,924 Area Chat Allowance-Col Ft. Current Area Codt kcmrdce $15422 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,475,935 Middle School 651,273 District Avenge Assessed Value Senor Hgh 1,007,622 Single Fal Radial $263,382 Tool mur 3,134231 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,547,588 Mitldie School 676,273 Senior High 1027294 Total 3,253655 Developer Provided Sita/Facilities Value 9 • D vall Units 0 OlsMCtAverage Asiessetl Value MuPFFamily Resonance $82,971 Capital Levy Tax Rate/51.000 Current /$LOW Tax Rate $174 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 439% Kee SCMd nINp SU-Year Carol Facen c; Plan ran aX* papa 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION by SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Sit' Mqu@Illon CON W Single Feeney Residence Fmmla'. fUnea>COalceraue IFaaRry ca Iylx Stwwl C.e?a Rm Faaw xw Pen W w FaNry upenl alm • At (LIME I it §10.001 µ 6L056.&i 2 (MIINWSMM) 21 50 ¢la. AO (Senh J 32 p 1.000 a m y 6 A -> Ef,Mim Fermanml FxilNy COnaOUCtbnLwl ryr$irpb Family PesMenp Foimuu' ((FeoYrycwll Facalry Ca anhlx5ugenl Faamj x( m Spwre Fm u9e adly Fao Fyfalaiy C S E m mpell Fw PaRo Ol Menmrv) s19,m9.Ob NP 0148 0 9 sts.3li set (Me B2 1Mae toss 0115 0.96 s ID B 3 (Servo- HIM) HlgO Eds,B0 0,145000000 ,202 0252 0,96 §5,1)3AD .10 OBU 3, §2.51.01 ampo'ary FatiMy COR pen single Family RMJeme PomluN: (IFadIPy WVFatlpry Cepatl (a SNeml Fagplape ry it tg 84 um, FmNice Pan) FvilyCnn FavayC,,,w w Foceageesec Ct EB),WO (EkeMH 21 040 a04 $71)8 c2 "1 SI Eo 29 O.t4B 004 §0 3 (9eMVHlga1 vr.m 31 0252 DIM 53151 one C-> 5103.32 Sltle Rach Geeg W single FgclN PminNnp Fmnut greaC lNWmee>SPI Some Feel per III x gained Maltli%x Stude nt Fxy Srrtn B % E WiMmerv) 5151 T2 O 1 O.SSW OW ¢3,Id]33 D2 IMMIe StlvA1 5151.22 7 0 OAH • 50 1 03 ISUrvWIA) $15132 3p 0.5594 p2q 52,02623 O > 1271, q Tie Crttle ryr single Family acepee... Pvaex L el vaMa ScONI2 e e 1 g.p).OW Curenl Lapel Love Clang $174 5171 RMI Cl,i BUtl Intenest WA 138% yn nm Yaars MwhYee (10 UOYron) 10 TC-> 53,61533 DaviIMXf RwlEM Fedlitl' Creed Fatlliryl BN Vyue Evvepirpllnia 0 0 FC-> 0 Fee Recap = File Mcne6spn SFRWMI 5105583 6=Pew ml fatltlNCwlm?Pepeence $1 c ienpavy FaollrycwlcelRVaence $10132 SARNI 521,677.19 D=State Malty CmeR pm Petieenm §g,ZlyFp TC= T" Crelp px BeyMnw, 51.33 SuMOo-I 59,90994 TO&LMUMat New §11,767.25 50% Darer Fa eNiI $5,861 FC= FadSry Gwil 0lapryiaa , 0 Dlsvla Aypelmml LSa Fyeameynaxsq ($956) Net Fee WneNgM pn Seal Fanny BwlRrce $5.928 KM SdaI INM1 S, Year Caput FatllNaa Pen gpnl 20M Page 2B KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULT bFAMILY RESI DENCE iY Kyul W m Coal per MuX W anlly Resit, Unil • Formula ffA lCwtKrAcm)l Fatl4 CaWtlyjx StWXit C¢nal mFaNw U? evllry CapaFy I IElemenpryl if00(9t 11 390 0293 E696. 75 A21MU aM) 21 $0 1,065 0 056 $0 50 A3 (SeNowwil No) 32 $0 1000 0091 5p 045 A --> 5396.75 Pelnnaren4 eplM Cnru00CN0n CM Per MUM1liamiry feel6ence Un it Fttmub (IFaolXy COaI/FepOry Capadlylx StWenl Fepoeja lpeim IDy a Ratlo mlM lpav 3 Fina}wao B11Elemendryl 518 W0,0W 5W 0203 ON 110,IM05 32 (M6*Schoan SD 1.(e5 0058 0% so B3 (Senior HlgO 4 are](low 2288 jrp91 098 $1,92976 040.5 a 112,1MA 1 Temporary FIOW Cmt W MUIIIFamily Realoenm Unit Fvr,,Ia ((FmVIy COrI/FaGIIfy Cepntl a9tWenl Facbpr elMp¢ry/iodl SQUem Fme6a Ratlo ?M Wn wMCwav e Forwp pzw C1 lDerrermryl f9],W3 24 0.293 117.37 C2 (MNAe3UVW) SO 29 0)58 OM $0 C3 ISenb4gn 397000 31 09K 0.04 slim 0445 C, 55913 SMe Ma1N Cretlil pw MUNFamXy ReaNarne unit 'coed,: Ma Coal Morava x 5W Square Fxl Per Skeen' a 0.aNd MaW % v SIUM I Facb ltw® ? R w 515t R 1 IElemenkryj 90 05594 0.293 322740'1 • C2 (ITnY S6 $IAa tq 0 0.0W 50 U3 (Beno Wpnj $19.22 130 O.S59a 4105113 U 3332019 Tea GMII cer M uNFamlly Residence Unit Avemne MF ReaMm4al A sco0 Value 382911 umm C90101 Levy Xab l 31,000 $1.74 Curtem BwtllMeresl Wb 39% Yeart AmoN (10 Years) 10 TC-a $114561 Mvebpar Frovl6ei Fxi0N Credit aoiiryl5ik value [Nrerin9N3ts 0 0 FC-a e Fee Recap P = SIB A0lu4km per W1,Family WX 5656.75 S=pumvrznl FaeNyC tree MF UnX $1305534 C = Tenyrr y Fatiliry Cnn per MF UM 359.13 0U1 $12811.73 D= Seen Mend) QM0 per MF UnR $33M.19 TC=TV Creed pw MF UM 11.14561 SUnbttl 34,4]480 TQW LMUnGM NFeo 68.336,93 59%Dee,e er Fee gAgaeon 36,168 FC-Fmtly Gant 0n,pr el 0 Wtixi bpsenent L? pye25 rvoplaoabnl (11x) Net Fee 0blWlnn cer MUlbFamiy Radmce Una $3,034 Mem 3rimlC6lrJ Shvmr C ll Falbr, Fm Ari ID06 page 20 IX Summary of Changes to April 2005 Capital Facilittes Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2005 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School, a forme n elementary and classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation of Sequoia Mitltle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School and Phase It of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class sae for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is defected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus andlor movement of portables between facilities. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections continue to reflect need for future additional capacity at elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the - future. The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to space changes and grade level remnFguration. Changes refeced no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is incluced as Appendix E. Changes to impact Fee Calculated; Factors include: Student Generated Factor Ekm dQ2 dint Renw Single Family Si we 0151 010 renewed aH U284 0 252 Revised Time 092] 0W Student Generated Factor Ekm 0293 0?93 Rotted he no choose Mufti Family (MF) MS does 005a Reorient 5H 0.11A cant Rsrw d Told 0,478 0445 State seam Credit Ov Sbe 56N% P,r 01 (11 di Area Cost Aldwande( Bneckh Index) u2no at Sol Per WIN Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $22558 Vdi Perou9e iii ESo AV- Average of Condominiums& Apt9_ Nr 1]6ba2 Se 971 Per rare so no time Debt Stevens Capital Il Rate) SIM $!U d74 er son county Aazaamem General Oleftopdn Bond Interest Rate an% 030% caner me Impact Fee - Single Family 84.715 Subs Charge to so, $153 Impact Fae-Molt-Family tor $?SM $3034 Chan9ebbe-8941 n lJ • C Ken ri Gmh Si.. cannot FaduAks Pon Are IDW onge 30 • Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey • bent SaMel OMficl sd-ve., Capital FxCTA¢ Fran Apm 20M Page 31 ? Ra@®c'x:.?me °s 5x??a s^saw-aa? - f as¢ . .n..m m. nm. ..._ Ct®ERSB°o^»8 °n 88 R `o o8°n ^.8;, zo 0a 0 Z _> eR °R? yQ $ F?,; -segx.?e?$:_v a"Q?ma .:°ae°s„„°avasR o w `€ as?e ram Rai-5ia€.w>:€§fc:a?€auEeR: e E c x x o o s ? ? s ? m n m » a? ; o o ? o o o e , m o o m o o e ?S m m m n 'n 2 C. d d R m m m . m w m h m m m m" i u x s s i i 5 .? n 5 ? R o S F g E 8 9 9 E E E 6 s u x s f s z e? p c8 s a x a ? ? ? ? s w i$ G E ,C a C R m ? R R . ? $ o =3 ry X p _ O ee a n n 3 - _ m e 5 R ? $ e r 0 X 0 w a `s sf a ane B w y u % J $ `c 6 95? a Y C >F? 3 3x°a 6R? x t58 g S 5 w K S a 6 Z U F N 0 O m i Y a a' o 0 3 33 I e - 221 S g S e o ? _ o s ss ,? e w ?1 o e ? _ o _I . e a e o ? s e s ? ? ? o e F $ o of e 3 Y' j - , ?' ? o o e o q S m `e E J - rc ? E ?, _ '" E S 'qE ? = [Y $ s $ E e ° ? = $ u g ? U a a F E N mJ F U O w `o "s 9 fi p a g ._ x? F 8 ? ? a °m ? E € - a S o a e 3 9 Y • Zz U a ?LL 00 O y O U' Na Z? Y U a o oo o e °o o oa e°o oo o oo vo o ooo 0 0 0 = z ? oo e e °o o on eo 0 0 _ vo oee m o ? = e Bry _ _ °o o ?o ae? _o ? orv __ ? ooo o ? a m C` u y w u u f u x -. u a z 0 z y f z w vw. u rc a u 3 E 3 m o LL a ? € - 8 e - - _ @ - - _ 3 e t° - ? - 8 U - ? E E E - 8 8 a Z 2 U N 3 ? c po N 00 00 2? ya z N Y 8 L s R $ a o o .? o o N ^ ? g S $ ? v w ur ?. m a S N E O ? 3 _ f - 6 E E ? L • Policy/Text Amendment #3 Dieringer School District Updated information to existing adopted Capital Facilities Plan (2005-2011) Incorporate Dieringer School District Updated information as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. • • • • 0 • Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2005=2011 • Board Approved August 29, 2005 0 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICTNO. 343 1320-178° Avenue East Sumner, WasblMgbn 98390 (253)862-2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jtm Ha oot Pete George Corey Powtak • Larry Thompson Mary Kay Wnssers mm Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, 8uperffiwndeut 0 • Dieringer Educating every child for Confidence today and • Contribution tomorrow Dicringer School District No. 343 Dieringer School District An Overview • Established in 1890, Dienn gn-School District consolidated with lake Tapps School District in 19M. The District's three schools, lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Ididdle School, provide K though 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in uoincorporated Bence County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney lake and Sumner. The hih nct surrounds the northem two -thuds of lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. The Moral student enrollment is approximately 1,220 students in grades kindergarten through eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Iake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Dicringer Heights as memary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home m students in kindergarten, fount and fifth grade. Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998, North Tapirs Middle School houses students in grades sixth-eighth. The district supports in additional 531 high schml modems who may select to attend my public Ngh school. The majority chose to attend Aubum Riverside and Sooner High School • The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education. for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, connibuting members of somety. Dieringer is composed of students who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. poems are concerned with student success end provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School Distinct. Tne YrA and many volautws contribute countless hours and resourres to our schools and students. The community supports the. schools through the passage of funding issues to support bus Wmesitian, student access to current technology and the construction of school facilities Capital Facilities Plan Update: 2005 0 ATTACHMR n For da pmposes of the 2005 amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Pierce County Comprehensive Pfau, we would Idea each actual district to use the format as outlined in the tables below. Tablea PS 1 Complete ties table as in Name Cowry's 2M. Cappst Facilities Han, lung each comentary, each iutermediate/middleTjutdm high, and each high schnal two attachment #1). Table a-PS-1. Cesare Faci ides Inventory Public Schools he invento ofCamat Public Scholl ra iW Includes includes the fonowm: Capacity ame (Number of Smdamum 1,ocation - cMwl District entary 396 1320.1]8 Ave. &, St®nm- Elementary F 431 21]2]-34° St. E., Sumner le School 405 20029-121° St. E., Sumner 0 TAL 1232 " • Dieri er Schwa District 2(106C 'aiF "t" H Table IX-P S.2. You do not rreW to provide any information regarding tans roble firm anachment#]. 0 • r j.. J 1 ? ` / OJm i 8d?8 g?Iai d ? ?. ?Ul.e ?i. • Lake Tapps Elementary. Construction 2004-05 • r, LJ Dieiinge Heights • J 0 • r"1 U i i J OF ov v? NN wp p0 ?O S Nv DL N RJU QJU SZ_ KLU Op Enrollment projections • The "stinger Scho d District is located in un area Not co mums to expcnons growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment and data, proposed housing development, the increase in the assessed valuation of the teal property and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District experienced a period of slow, steady growth in student emulumad with a ten year avenge of 1.74% between October 1994 and 2003. This mirrored the Pierce County 2.03% and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSES)) 199% enrollment growth over Me same period. Beginning with November 2003, the District saw a notable increasm in student emolument resulting in a 4.5% increase from September 2003 to September good. Currently, Diednger is the most rapidly growing Mania in Pierce County H433%OCober to Octobe11.95% tun year average) and substantially exceeds Me Pierce County (41.62% October to October) and Me PSESD (+.016% October to Octmbear). A review of proposed construction within the borders of the INeringer School District indicates Out Me growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and beyond. Pont eare 842 single family residents slated for constructing within Me next four years. The two multi-family projects, transferred fiom Pieu:e County to the City of Aubmn, will contribute an additional 485 residential units during 211115-20(16. Have • pm)sts as unlrtipmed to generate an additional 460 students in kindergaren through eighty grade. In addiOOO, 161 students will be added to enrollment from normal growth fiom individual houses and in-migration by September, 2011. Information from finesse County Planning & Laud Services indicates Nat there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 more lots in the western portion of the district that are not mcluded in the above numbers. To address this growth Me District is Trendy developing plans to construct an additional five classrooms at Dicnvger Heights Elso moot and an auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and fear science rooms at Nmds Tapp; Middle School by fall of 2006. Future anticipated growth will create the need to sister an additional school site and construct an additional school to house the growing student erwllment. C Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase proposed Housing Units for Approved Developments: Single Family- 842 x 48 generation factor = 404 students K-8 grade Multi-family-485 x .1149 generation factor=56 students K-8 Wade (Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Cenemtion Factor) Proposed Housing Units from Individual Lots and In-migration: 161 students K-8 grade Enrollment Impact: 621 students K-8 • Estimated 103 students a yearover the period 20(620/1 PotenBal enrollment increase =51 84%(based on 1,195 emolument "5) Increase per Wade level =69 students Approximately 207 students per school DOUSING DEVELOPMENTS August 2005 91 Fairweather Cove Estates (255) - Notice of application t/24/01 - 25 Single Family Ims -16011-2000 black of le St. @ the 17500.198W block of SumnerPappas Hwy. - Develop phase started 3/05 Counsel - Carl f losan (253) 307-1922 - 25 hlitigimon Impact Fees outstanding 02 Rainier Plateau (10) -Notice of application 10INIX) - 10 Single Family Lots - End of 341° St. - Plat Approval resubmitted to Pierce County -Possibly 2005 (waiting for county road permit) - Counsel - Walter Bishop (253) 537-3705 -10 Mitgatan Impact Fees remounting #3 Quiet Water (86) -Notice of Application I V31194. Reapplication 3119/99 - 156 Single Family Lots sold - Along 214x' East of Tapes Island -% homes under construction 5/O5(7ooccupied 9-05) . -Contact Pacific Resource Development (253) 848-5541 -86 Moigmion Impact Fees outstanding #4 Grandview Ridge R and III (12) - OF Sum en-Tapes Hwy. acmss from Driftwood and Dear Island Dr. -Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1113199 - 50 Single Family Lots; 38 completed 5105 - Substantial completion by fall 2005 H; Ill (9 lots) stmt fa112005) - Contact Mr. Westined (253) 606-4685 -12 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #5 North'rapps Estates (193) -north of Lake Tapps Elementary -Prelimfuary Plat 712102 -193 Single Family Lots Development phase started 3/05 -Contact Matthew Sweeney (253) 565-1728 -193 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 96 While River View Tracks (0) -Elve rds Road (overlooking the White River Valley) • -27 Single Family Iats - Completed 5105 - Contact Summit Reality, fenny (253) 405-5292 - Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding AO Forest Canyon Highlands (251) -NOfice of application 821/04 • -251 single family lets South of mad terminus from Lakeland Hills Hwy. -Contact Terry Barghaosen(425)251-6222 -Construction 2006-2008; fall completion winter 2008 -251 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #8 Tapps Meadow (Van Her Hoek) (11) -Notice of application 9/134A -11 large lots -across from Snag Island -Contact John Hill (253) 798-3185 -11 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 0 Terrace View Park (430) -Enviramneutal Impact Statement with Addendum 928/99 430 MultiTandy Units (apartments: 1, 2 and 3 bedroom) -Off East Valley Hwy., at base of new Fake Tapps Parkway. -Contact Jeff Extra, Auburn planning Dept., (253) 931-3000 #10 Country Creek Rsmtas (9) -95iugle Familyf is-off l5a near Pdwaids Road -Constriction =5 with first homes fall 2005 -Contact Robert Stewart, Developer,(253) 833-0857 • -9 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding (see file notes) - #11 Forest Canyon Fatales JIM) -124 Single Family Lots-off Forest Canyon Rd. -Site Development spring 2006 with site completion by 2008 -Conduct Larry Onmar, Agent (425) 251-6222 -124 Mitigation lapact Pees outsanding #12 Forest Canyon Heights (21) -21 Single Family Les bffForest Canyon Rd. -Construction April 2005 with first home by January 2006 Contact Rick Gica ger (253) 531-0412 office; (253) 380-0996 cell -21 Mitigation Impact I= outstanding 742 Single Family Units to be built 430 Multi-family Units to he built #13 Auburn Annexation (155) -100 Single Family Cum • 55 townhouses 8105 Standard of Service The Drainer School District houses children in elementary schools serving students kindergarten through fifth is& and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. High school students, grades rate through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Auburn School District. Dietinger School District follows a traditional school calendar beginning in early September and completing in mid rune. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49 and 845 a.m. and end behown 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Diefinger School District standard of service is basal on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Due to the passage of Initiative 728 and in keeping with the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of Andorra per classroom kindergarten through third guide is 22, fourth through fiM grade 25 and sixth through eighth grade 27. These class sizes have impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes In the I mitt, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not counted as capacity classrooms. At are elementary level students are provided music instruction, physical education and art instruction in separate, non-capacity classrooms. Computer labs are . provided at each school as warcapacity, spaces. Special education and remedial programs are provided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 516 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. C. Table IX-PS-2A. Cooiplete this table by in icating [be level of service of square fat per student, which has been established at emh hovel (elementary, InlcrmediaWmlJJldjaNOr high, high school) for your school district. Table IX-PS 2A. School District Service Standards Public N Pacili nt Sm deaq (S tame reef en District Name Elementary Schools Middle Schools Iunlrti I$gb Scboola ScviorF igh Schools wringer 120 189 NA NA ATTA(MT IX-PS-2-1 Complete "a table as in Piq County's 2004 CapiW Pacihrics Plan. list purposed individual capacity projects for 2" -2011. • • TTAC14.7eNP IX-PS-2-1 Public- School Fatalities PIDhV [HJA CAPACITY PROIECPS Noun Ca a hes Filcmevtary 116 oom addition r o.3 4W iddle School 162 lab, auxiliary gym, health sad lassoom additon Mgb NA TaWa PS-3. Plraae wwideN Wwaatiwl am time vU;od. soo6so11. • able a-PS-3.C Prjcc(s and Financing Plan Sources aW Ikea of Ponds a$1,M) Public Schc0l Facilifies Sowc 2006-2011 f FUnda CVevve: Paoceeds, Reserv e- r 0 enue: , Levies, Fees, Same Mashing , Dedications, Mltlgation Paymmis EE].310 ToW Sources ords Heighm Elen say 71g lassroom addition (E4n5) r School No.3 es Middle School auO seience lab, av liary gym, beabb and fiM classroom (E6.450) wkHfion Non-Capaciryftoj cb: (L.675) Vane fim additions m wchaology Wlpades S bluW (E2]99o) ToW Costs (>2],E40) Balance a sumlug m(Deficlo 0 n U 0 I I I 2 1 0 L I ? E o 0 o a o m N O o o 0 0 a o v O J 0 E O O _ O • O 6 ? a _ _ 0 U E .? V 0 W C' N Z m w W OI .- f N a > > za LL ? ? n I r O C I I W U N i 0 Q o 9 0 m R` ? Q O m U a U O N ? M1 W ? N o O ` 2. Z m N n b c ? U c 6 m _ '° o a ? c ? U U - E C Q m I- 5 c I- a p w Z F= z ?` F r ' Or Table lX-PS-5. • no 'total Cost" in Ne following table shows the total cost of rapacity projects needed to mars the level of service standards for school Facilities.Toeaholate"Total Cost," you Can vu the following formula: Trial Cost Net Deficiency (frmn'Net Reserve mDefinepry" Calonm) School Distum Cost per Student (fioln Table IX PS 5A.) Because "School Dbhict Cost Per Smdenf (item Table M-PS 5A.) differs amoag tbe elemcawry, inmrrrediateAmddlefju rior Ingh, and high schools, separate calculations raid to be made for eacb, and thw added together to obtain dhe'Total Cost" figure. B flue "Net Reserve or Dehueoey" column shows a new reserve, the "Taal Cost" rotation will beWas Table EX-PS S. Gpital Facility Requirements, to 2011 Public School Fatltities boo, Table ff SAforindividual rates at each level.) T epmod Slower SNdent NeiReserve Total Cost PolmLtioN Capacity (Cort/St bmt SmLeneOwaod Qlefidmey) Nd Defteim[y) 1fp3Acwi 1219 - IM 13 20052011 GmmM1 621 678 SI NorvCapwryCwls Tolnl Gw as of zml e"e J n U • • I N l X ry I N F O W a OW ¢ J np _WN N x xx ° vz ? aU? U W ? Z N G G m < W - m v Y e u i < 1 a ¢ W m ? C 6 p p ? U m ? N m ? N ° U m a e U ? E `- m 6 m `E m Nm- c E [Liu w m m 0 E I ? Q ` m m w U F 3 c_ ? N m N v N m- qJ 0I 0 z z J J 00 W z Z b N N F O Table a-PS-SA. - - • CmvPleu'this table as in Pierce County's 2DbI Capital FacJiaes Plan. Nl ossible, use 2001 dollars. If you are using dollars from a difietent year, indicate the yea. Table W PS-5A. Scbool District Cost Pa Student Public School Facilities (20o4DOllars) Dlealct Name Ernrotery Midge Joc l? Sclwola ioo scFOOIe ools DletingV 8RJ45 ,532,238 NA E7NA I ? • • • LJ ScM1O II 1F Calcul [ion DIMICT A5/HQ a 4cM1OdsX_ oral (PaeaCmfp per re)/wCYl C_ayoGYly2x5tutlenl6aradeO PC ocr 4 or Student t Student Tacitly Cast/ Foci Fades Factor Calf/ Cost/ rea Pcreape pc Capaa IY SFR Elementay, __0.?Y( WyyQs?x¢q`4s+9dWb"?aP Mtltlle I u?n! ? _ NINE MFR ex• TOTAL SFR 5965 5965 HiR $206 _ $205 5¢fml wa¢elroHOn cost: -- (ffocillyCwi/wdory cap«Fryh9Nden Gerremfim_wcfopx(perm arnnirtald Ft ?__$ludt Fodw Cast Co Ty $FR -- sNtlem Faclar MFR _Cost/_ __ SER coal MFR Elementary No.3 S17400,00J am 0322 - O.IM9 $IJA39 _ 53,E , Elemontay DHES°'TIT a U.11 OS22 Naylor 11 Mtltlla 9[F Mdli gpy p .r, 0.159 _ amr, 00N6 _ SAM $6,307 $5,051 $1,839 TOTAL $25267 5,893 im p rsy CosH/FOCrt"arc I ((P aoli EIICapaIUy)-, - 6errervM1On - «(Yemp ar l5 uae Feet _ Ude 59utlent urcent SNtlerH COSI/ Cost/ %Temp/ FacIN Favor ily Factor _ Fa[YOr SFR _ MFR_ _ Total Sq.F Cost Sza SFR MFR 11 Elementary °" ov 0.322 0I "Fro"l MItlSe R 0.1_5.9 ak4 - m 0.009 0016 _ - - TOTAL $0 $0 Sale WnAn CreJ --e- Bp_e_C_khlr?Jex%s%S@nre on a%gsMCi MaKM1%%SludeM Fa ctor 1. 3Traft Tana kF SFI gsVkt Fmtor Faafor Cost/ Cast/ IrMex FoMOOe Motclr%SFR M_kMle .. - MF2 SFR MFR aaN.wdm __- _ _ TOTAL NO $U Tax Payrn¢nt Cants Avery Ad5)Etla (eS Hand Internal Role - _.. • u SFR R -- Hejy{e NFR - ...® Net Present Value of of Aver Ver eOmelli Net 1&494 $2t $1 I3R441 Yens Pmorllsetl ? - _... ? • rr nanY Tarr Rape vro of RresenY Value of Revenu dream cy 1 3+61 $6661 " e? $qa9] _ Ftt Sual Sin If _MUHIRM E? Fomi 51 AC rdvtion CasYS _ 5965D] $206W Forma rreni wdl' Cost - $262 -$S.BWID a llIy CUM - xw 60.00 $O.W te Q H State Ydred -- _$UFp $(L CO iw Pay yment Cmtlif (S ) _ ($4 - - FEE $1N67I $19, $1 ]08 it FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 5 0% 9,835 X55 FEE WITH OISCOUNI OF 50% $604 RF Capital Facilities Plan Update: 2006 110! 2 4 20? NI A CHMEMk2 NG?fPAR ?ENI For the pof ores of the 2006 amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Pierce County Cmnprehensne Plan, we would like each ecboal district to use the format as outlined in the tables below. Table lX PS 1 Complete this table as in Pierre County's 2001 Capital Faoli ties Plan, listing each elementary, each intermuliatelmiddlelutdor high, and each high school (see attachment NI). Table TX PS-1 Concur Facilities Inventory Public Scbaols The inv oteunrnt PObtie School ca iml facilities includes the(ollnxdn- Cagain Name (Number of Students) Location Dbringer sbm(A District Iske Tapes PJCmemay 396 ]J2O178 Ave_E., Sumner Dbdnger Heights Elementary 431 21727-34'a St. E., Sumner North Tapes Middle School 405 20KXt l2" St. E., Sumner High School o TpTd 1232 PlematirSchoo]I) 26060 1F '1''ee elan Table 1&P S 2., You do not need to provide any information regaling this table from attachment #1 0 11 • Table W PS-2A. Complete Oda table by indicating the level of survicc in square! tpersmd®(, which has been established at each level (Gevoeutary, iotsmediatd®ddl?nmor high, high school) for your school district. StanJaNs Table lX-YS Dlsnlcte s public itiites Public Scch hool Facilities S care Feet sStutlenQ Elementary Middle TaniorHigh Senior Highll District Name Schools Schools Schools SchawS Dierioger 120 189 NA NA ATTACIRdENr a tai-2-1 Complem this table as in Pierce Count)•a 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. Idst proposed individual capacity projects for 200]-2012. ATTACIII]ENT 1%-PS2-I Public-School Facilities 1 ]VIDUAL CAPACITY PROJECTS Name Capacity Dieringw Heights pigmentary 116 5 cassroom addition Elementary No. i 400 North Tapps Middle School 162 science lab, amiliary gym. health and Gm ss classroom addition Sellita High NA lJ T.blcix PS I Umo, provide the information for one time pared, 2007-2012 0.. Table IX-PS-3. CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds 1x$1,000) Public School Facilities Sources Uses 2007-2012 Sources of Finds Existing Revenue: Bond Proceeds. Reserve 0 New Revenue: Bonds, levies, Fees, State Matching Finds, Dedications, Mifigafiou Payments $29.450 Total Sources 929,450 Uses of Rands porringer Heights Elementary 5 clamroom addition ($1015) Hletnemzry School No 3 (L? aa0) North Tapps Middle School science lab, Mary gym, health and hmess classroom ($5915) addition Non Capacity Projects (f?312) transportation additions and technology upgrades Rena Improvements (1,6]]) Subtotal ($29.450) Total Costs (#9,452) Balance 0 Surplus or (Deficit) 0 r\ ?J CJ 1 ; ? I ? j : . ? ? i ? I h o I '- l wU M n Ni m m m m Q O x a Z E m Z _ - Q a ? E p w _ u U ° - F ?. - i ? ? n ? E E j ° W U • m 7 ? ? - , ° `? o p ? ? ? ? o - ? _ E c R E - E ? F m U c 6 r m L b O ?i) L F Z F F Q H 1- Table TX-PS-5. The "total Cost" he the following table shows the total cost of capacity projects needed to meet the level of service standards for school facilities. To calculate "Total Coss' you can use the following fofmNa- Total Cost Net fieficietscy(hotn'Not Reserve m DeGcha y"column) School District Cael par Started drain Table a PS-5A) Because "School Extinct Cwt Per Student" (from Table IX-PS-5A.) diffles among the clerestory, int dfate/middlesjumor high, and high schools, separate calcNadonsread to be made for each, and tram added together to obtain the "Taal Cast" figure. If the "Net Reserve or Deficiency" cohwa shows a new reserve, the'Tral Cost" column will Ite Mo. Table EX-PS-5. Capital Facility Requiremznls, to 2012 Public ,School Facilities (Sec Table a PS5A fmmdividual roles at each level. Time Yenta Sladrvt Somaat Net Reawe Trial Cwt Yopamaul Calvary Icwtodadml Bmtlem Demand (DCfiorcvcy) Nat Dom,we) 2fMAwal 1.2ol 1$12 8 25342812 brevet 486 678 m armCapacity Costa oW Cast v of 2912 • • • Diefinger School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase June, 2006 Proposed Housing Utdis for Approved Developments: Single Family- 662 x 48 generation factor - 3I8 students K-8 grade Multifamily- 59 x .1149 generation factor- ] students K-8 grade (Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Generation Factor) Proposed Housing Units from Individual lmis and In-migatioo: 161 students K-8 grade Karoilmcnl import. 486 students K-8 • Estimated 81 students a yen over the period 2007-4012 Potential emmllment increase=39 71 W (based on 1,224 curvilinear 506) Increase per made level = 54 students Approximately 162 smdents per school 0 - HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS - June 2006 #1 Fairweather Cove estates (28) - Notice of application 1/21/ol -28 Single Fauvly Lots -16W 2000 black of this St, O the 19500-198W block of Sumnef-Tapps; Hwy, Construction stairs summer 2006 - Contact - Cart Halaan-developer (253) 309-1922 - 28 Mitigation hnpact Fees outstanding n Balance Plateau (10) Notice of application 10/13/00 - 10 Single Family Lets - End of 34'" St. Plat Approval resubmitted to Pierre County No date - Contact- Walter Bishop (253) 537-3905 -30 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #3 Quiet Water (5) -Notice of Application IMO/94. Reapplication 3/19199 -156Single Family Lola sold - Along 2141° East of Tapps Island -14 homes under constriction, 7 compleled/un iscupied, Slots. 129 occupied hogs) - Buildout 2006 • - Contact Pacific Resource Development (253) 8485541 -Paul Olson sell (253) 732-9030 -5 Mi ugadon largest Fees outstanding #4 Grandview Ridge D and HI N0) - Off SummerTapps Hwy. across from Dogwood and Beer Island Dr. - Grandview Ridge Notice of Applicatiw 1113/99 -50 Single FarmTy Lots; 49 completed 11105 - III (9 lots) no date - Contact W. Westmark (253) 6064685 -10 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #5 North Lake Tapps Fandea (193) -uonh of lake Tapps Elementary -Preliminary Plat 7123/02 -193 Single Family Luis -Construction spring 2007 -Contact Matthew Sweeney (253) 565-1728 -193 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding E #6 Forest Canyon Highlands OSH - -Nonce of application W27/04 -251 single finally Cuts Somh of mad terminus from Lakeland Hills Hwy. -Contact TOM Harghausm (425) 251 6222 -Construction January, 2001; first occupancy Ag(12007 -251 badgation Impact Fees outstanding #7 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Dark) (11) -Notice of application 9113/01 -11 large lots cross from Snag Island -pemaltting -Contact John hill (253) 798-3185 -11 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 48 Bedard Apartments (430) -Environmental Impact Statement with Addendum 9128199 430 Multi-Fnmily Units (martinets ; 1, 2 and 3 bedroom) -completed -Off East Valley Hwy., at base of new fake Tapps Parkway. - (ement Can Lamed, Project Manager (206) 431-7970 09 Country Fireside Estates (9) -9 Single Family Lots off 156 near Edwards Road • -Permitting -Contact Mr. Westmark (253)6064658 -9 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding (see file notes) #10 Forest Canyon Estates (pup -124 Single Family Lots bffPOrest Canyon Rd Site Development spring 2006 with completion by 2008 Contact lany Outran, Agent (425) 251 6222 -124 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 011 Forest Canyon Heights (21) 21 Single Family Lots -off Forest Canyon Rd. - 9 homes by 200/ -Contact ]tick Ganger (253)531J4 12 office; (253) 380-0996 cell -21 Mitigation Impact Lees outstanding #12 Terrace View TownboMes (59) -59 amts; 1, 2 & 3 bedroom units; East Valley and Cake Tapps Pkwy. -Auburn City Gnats -Constmchm summer 2097 -Contact l.ou Larsen, Project Manager ($06) 431 7970,(425)251 8811 -59 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding • 662 Single Family Units lobe built (469@ $2675; 193 @ $3500) 59 Multi-family Unfits to babuilt (@ $939) An estimated $1,9]3,696 in Mitigation fees is outstanding. An estimated 3] additional students are anticipated, K-8. #13 Auburn Annexation (IN) -I00Siogle FmAlylnts 6106 n U 0 • • U NI X I ? ?I ?I ?I w ow d J ip O X X X F_ W n U Z o Q U N nN U W ? i w q W 0 - m V ? a Y o Z? F U Q W j ° o v a d U ? ° U m e a U ? E - ? W Q ? ° m E o m N0 , T m w m o rn ?o E ? o ¢ mU - T¢ m = ~N cN E ? LN d - - ? 0W -cW ts pj 6 o 0 W Z z F O Table a PS-5A. • Cnmplete this table as in Nerve Couny's 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. If possible, use 2006 dollars If you are using dollars been a different year, indicate the year. Table a-PS-5A. School lNstrict Cost Per Student Public School Facilities (2006 Dollars) Earlier Nurc Elementary mime Iwior Iligh Senior Eigh Schools Schools Schmis Sclwols Dimnger 11792 35.139 NA NA x cN ? 0 Policyrrext Amendment #4 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan 2007 Incorporate Federal Way School District Updated Capital Facilities Plan (2007) as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Federal Way School District 40 Board of Directors, June 13, 2006.) 1 11 Federal Way Public Schools 2007 Capital Facilities Plan Building for the Future DL ERAL WAY PUBLIC SM(gLS 20 P/ CAPITAL PAC1IDES PLAN • FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILMES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Caslollu David Uv4ml amks Hoff Thomas Madden SUPERDfFENDET'T TM1mnaa R. Muryhy 0 • FEDERAL WAY MsHC SCIIO MID CAPITAL FA(lWl9FS PLAN TABLKOFCONfFNTS TABLEOFCONfB INTRODUCTION SECIIONI THE CAPITAL FACW PLAN InVOduclion Inventory of Educational FaciltUes Invenmryof Non-h dmcdonal Facili6cs Needs Fore l- Existing Facilities Needs Font ast - New Fwdifies Six Year Fasnce Mn S=ON2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDA Introduction Map - Elementary Boundaries Map - "Me school Boundan¢ • Map- Senior EBgh Boundaries SE(,`RON3 SUPPORTD)CIPOFNFA9 nN lnri c6am BuildiDgC pacifies Pwd le Locations SNdent Forecast Capwity Summaries King County Impact Fee Calculations SECIION4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES MOMTHE 2066 PLAN L , 11 ifi-jv 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 14-15 16 18 19-23 24-26 27-29 FEDERAL WAY PUBWC SCHOOLS 3001 CAPRALFACtI.t'19Bei PUN 0 INTRODUCTION Be response to the rdlairemeam of the Spite of Washington Growth Management Act (SIBS 2929 (1990) ad F IIB 1025 (1991)), and under the Sehoul Import Fee Commands; or King County Code 21A, City of Parent Way thsBnance No. 9 U9 effective Dd mbar 21, 1995 in amended. City of Kem Ordinance No. 3" effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn ONinanoe No. 5098 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2006 Capital Facilities Plan as of lying, 2006. This Plan is scheduled for adop0on by King County, the City of Kcnq City of Bcderal Way and the City of Amens staff is indrimse red in the Comprehensive Plans of each jwlsdidom by referenda This plan is also included in the WcHi es Plan element of ihe Comprehensive Plans of each junsdidion. To date, the City of Des Moires has nor adopted a school armed be coliseum, The Growth Mamgement AU idiu ms the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can W wmumped The Gowth Management Planning Council adopted and recormrtended to the King County Council far Urban Comm Arcs line Maps with designations for Wilda centers . A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area. which dsompa ems; Federal Way Public Schools boundaries King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, johs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimmul population gmwM is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Mmagemem Act This plan is not intended to W the sole planning tool for all Mthe Dismct needs. The Erandmayprepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. As the prjects from the 1999 bond were fine ursit, the District p iddread a 20war plan for me renrova4an and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. Phase 1, a $245 million bond wasprrsentd to the vofem in Febmuq 2006. This receiveda 54% Yes vde, rodis unntely notenough m pass- The School Board is studying options for placing the bond proposal W the Selrtemberor November of 21106 ballots. If appmved the bond would rvplace four elementary schools, Iakelad, Pauttrer lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and ore ndddle edged Ukom. Federal Way High School would he replaced and capacity increased by approximately 800 students. Fedecnl Way High School was built in 1938. It has been mdddl onto at Ieast 10 names and currently has an almost mave-like, layout. The con to rebuild is $81 million. The reconsaucdon would increase the capacity ofihehigheheolby8t SW&nts,orbyabout33% Padofthisconisincluddlinthe Capital Facilifies Plan impact tee calculation. The noninslmctioml pmjdds freluded in the 20 year plan will cunwlldare suppoa services opemlions at a single femora, 'Ric current Transportation and Mainteome facility cannot continue to met me Dicand needs • mthefutum. Nutnuov serviesand Mhu edmininrative fnngtions will also reaooamm construction rumerige dists w wBionl . he re- Because calwlatd Poor Poor to the then next xt bond flation, estimated ctiog costa Gectlon. III . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCIgpIS}prI GPITAL FACWTIGS PLAN The proposed bond package includes shared instructiorul and community mediates. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Foreard Way Celebration park sports fields and future Community Center. A perfmmases atdiunimn is planned fora comer of to FMexal Way lfigh School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An envimnmenMl instruction and retest center is proposed for property adjoining Sommyah Moue School. In Septmnber 2006, the District will open a pilot program at thahee middle school m allow 5 Wish, students to attend This first proposes will have fifty 5n grade students receiving instruction on the Blahee Middle School campus. As smaller class sizes roll meomm ism the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle xhool bcIw(aa 200] and MIB Sequoyah Middle Schaal opened in Scpemher 2001 With de opening of Segooyah Mddle School the average omodment a all middle schools is between 650 and M students. Arwther initiative that impacts capacity at the secondary schools is the finger SWIM Baly College. Mghhnc CommmdtyCOILgrisoffenngthispmpo toll°adl2°gmde students at the F)(muni Way campus. The progaa allows promising lm and om gale colleges Ne opportunity to complete of high so ool diploma and the Associate of Airs college degree in their final two years of high . The District is also coruidering offering one m four schools with a Emdergamort through 8 grade immusoonal crnfigmstma, 9hem schools could be offered at existing sites, with appropriate faifitychanges_ Otl optionsforopening Me.whoolsamfww mnshucdon mpu¢hase and ?amodcl of existing builNngs. The district has a cooperative agreement with It d Stan for facility use to serve income eligible Pr Kmokrgmten studenm. A new Hi alx art facility on the Elm y Tuummm High School campus opened in January 201 This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Hrea shad was housed at three of the elementary schools in me Federal Way Dearer. Unready the only Mcentmhzed program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Fora Elementary. lie District is facing unique challenges with declining consumers at some levels and anticipated morrom is in State loading forvelocities, Elementary populations have declined the past two roes and projections show moderate growth at this level. Because of declining enrollment and continuing budget clal lentm, the concept of closing an elementaryschooliBNenearfulumfw esmfaced ACOmmntawiBbeueztMoodieng the 2006101 school yea an study elementary populations and boundaries. A ommendatiw tram this consulate could include consolidating elementary populations in to fewer facilince. Many filters emmidedng educationed requirements and fiscal responsibility will be used m develop a recommendation 1, the Brant, I1 FP.IIFAAL WAY WIBWCSC10 1001 CAPITALFAMITMl PLAN • SECTION 1- TILE CAPITAL FACT IFS PLAN The Stale G owtli Mmiagement Act requires than several pieces of information be gathered to dacmme the facilities available mM meded to meet the needs of a pyowing coawunily. This acclion provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs. and espectN future facility "u mosents for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows espe funding for any new roreuucUm, portables and modemizabon listed follows this. 0 • F?EIUI, WAYPUBLIC9CtlOOLSIW)CAPIiALFACILITIPd PLAN INVEN ORYOFIWUCATIOHAL FACILIT EI.F.Me TARYSCHOOLS Adelaide 1635SW304thSUect Federa Way 98023 Rrimilibn 3601 SW 336th Strew bacterial Way 98023 Curtailer 4041 S 298th SUat Auburn 98001 Enterprise 351015th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 3260747th Avenue SW Felernl Way 98023 lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Stuart Auburn 98001 L cGrow 303 SW 308th Speat FedeadWay 98023 L eland 3567532nd AwimS Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake ROad federel Way 98003 MaadiOa Hill 5830 S 300th Street Aulwm 98001 Mirmrlake 625 S 314th Streit Federal Way 98W3 Naudlus 1000 S 289th Sneer Federal Way 90103 Olympic View 2626SW327thStreet Faderal Way 98023 - PandarLtke 344241st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Ranier View 301553686 Stmt Federal Way 98003 Sherw0odbovist 346(10126 Avenue SW IbdmlWay 98023 Silverlake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Scar lake 401452706 Strain Kent 98032 Snrmycast 2462942nd Avenue S Kant 98032 • Twin Laha 44(X1 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27M7 42M Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwaad 2405 S 310th Street Fedeta Way 9SM3 Wtwdmont 26454166 Avenue S. Gas Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOM Federal Way Public Acadnny 3462091° Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Mahan 3b3Ul lst Av"wS Felcral Way 98003 Kilo W0(i S 308th SUCat Auburn 98001 L om 1415 SW 3146 Sheet Federal Way 98b23 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saahalic 33914196 Avenue SW Fedemi Way 98023 SNuoyah 3450 S 360' S Auburn 98001 Tatain 26630 411h AveS Kent 98032 SEMOR IBGH SCHOOIS Decamr 2800 SW 320th Stmt Federal Way 98023 FedualWay 30611166 AvenueS FedemlWay 98003 Tiwmaslefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beam. 3599916th AveS Federal Way 98003 Harry 5 Truman 3145528th Ave S Faders Way 98313 ALTERNATNESCllOOL Mentsclaol 36001 In AveS Federal Way 98003 • LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 Ist AveS Fdenl Way 98" 2 ". F®OLIL WAYP TJC SC LSa% CAPITAL FACILITIES PL4N CIIItRRNT INVENTORY NON-N RUCTIONALFACILITM DevNmW Procerh Admimstative Building 31405 I8M Avenue S Fcderd Way ifWl hh Tsite 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 C mrid miclwa 1344 S 3o&h Street Fedend Way 98003 Fehml Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Sheet Fcbml Way 98003 LemM sons C awmily Resouce Center 18t3SCOmmons FWerd Way 98003 Avadablel3KeeSFaro 3081914'aAwS Fcderd Way 98003 Undeveloped Prawrty Site C Loratioti 75 SW YOM Street &3rd Avenue SW-9.2 Acres • 65 S351e Street&52WlAVenueS-9&Acros 60 E of l0lh Avenue SW-SW 334th&SW 335th Sweets-10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 3208 and cast of 45's M SW-2345 Ames ]l S 3446 Suet & 46th Avenue S - 11.43 Acres 82 to Way S asA S 342a St - Mhtimal acreage 74 3733S 360°St-47.13 Acres(PZw of this site is being used fee Sequoyah MiJdlc Sdwol) % 5308's St aid 148 Ave S-J6 Ames 81 S332 ad St and 91° Ave S-20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped ptopcdies we large enough to mesa school cm,M,fMo re0Mwww a Fmpe0es may be traded iw sold depending on what locations Me dad m house students in the Disinct. • 3 • YIDPAAI. WAY PUBWC SCNOOL51 CAPITAL FACWTIM PWN NEI M FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES BALSI9NG PACIWTY FUTURENEMS ANTTCIPAT®SOUftC60F FUNIal Purthase and Relooate Interim Capacity AntiripeNd sauce of funds is postalows Ire Ices. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Building Rome Bond Sales [ eland. Panther fake, Suns t ar l Valhalla Iskob Mddk School R ace Existin Buildin Pbnne Bond Saks Federal Way High School Replace Eaiating Building, Future Bond Sales - fncmaseCa ity The District is also planning the replaccmcnt of some naFi Mrctional facilities. ne DiMcl has purchased 20 acres forcros[mctioo of consolidated facilities for support servicea factions- Trmseponauan, Nu ition Services, Maimcnanm and other non inswctiorel furctions will he • loused at this=11rali Alocadon. As pan of dee 4 ye:a plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the DecamelBgh School site. Increased capaeiry at Pedval Way lBgh in Phew I and at DmmurlRgh in phase 2 supplant the renal fm consUUction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 11 U FERAL WAY FIIBLIC SOIOOLS]Iq'1 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN •. NEEDS FORECAST-NEW FA[,F NEW FACILM No can tplans fox ww facilities. 0 • I • R Q ? ! ? ? ? ? w 3 ? 8 y^ ffia a ?? g ss x e a ? g a ? $$?^ x s 3 =$ A K = s a ?& s s ? °E In ` s $g ? a a s s 4 g3 $ ? y 8 ? a ?= 3 S _ m S s v y $e 3i x ? ? ?" S S ?' 3 s° q 9 '. 0 F®HIUL WAY PIIHWC SCHOOLS 2000 C MAL FAC Ijlci PLAN SRCTTON 2 -MAPS OF DISTRICT ROONDARIMS Federal Way Public Schools (the District) heu twenty-three elementary schools (gmdcs K-5). seven middle school schools facades ti-S), five water high sclwols (glades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades b -10 for the 2apwda school year. The bummer Academy sines grades K-12. M tannery 2005 the Board of Education adopled new secondary boundanes beginning with 2 5Pob whorl yeas. ITe following maps show the service ama boundaries for each school, by achmi type. (Hang S. Tunisian, Ifigb School, Meat School, hrtemet Acatlemy, ad Federal Way Public Academy serve students fmm [FVeughout the DisMct)_ the Identified boudmies are mvieand annually. Any change in gmdc cen"Pands i m adoption of pmpyarns that affect school populatims may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act retinues that a jurisdiction evduete if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of uses, public fuilitus, rxw (1evelopm^n[ has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development School DiSnels are different If the District class mt have permment facihdes reliable, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to much do population changes to the surrounding faciinam Adjusting boundaries raWres careful consideration by the Disuict and is not taken lightly, is '.. recogNad thu there is a potential impact on studenm whe are required to change schools. Boundary diucuaems Impact the whole district, notjust one when). It is important to realize that a single housing development doca and requhe the wnsueai in of a complete school facility. School duhicts are tequhed in P beet gmwth thmuppmt the distnu and build or adjust boudaries hasd on gowlh due eland the disuict, not just moved a single development. 0 • HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES {?,? FMnal WayRNkSdvds - ¦ ¦ a' • W Federal Way Public Sch Ls owe MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way K"1 Sd k yyyy?? v - f =-Y ; vI Federal Way Pubk SShods 3 F ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Rbf Sdwok umn¦r?m `were: llm? • w' w?. 1 _ ?N }E 5 - gym. ?. - ,V Federal W° Public Rhods • M® L WAY MBUC 5(: W" ZIIPI CAPITAL FAC UES PLAN SECTION 3- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Catenutus -The Education Pmgnm Poitable Locations Student EmeraR-200] tluoegh 2013 Capacity Summaries Iting County Impact Bees- Single end Multi Family Units 0 11 j F'BDGAAL WAY PUBLIC SMOOM 3 CAPITAL jzaj to;P Building (2apacificii This Capital Fxilities Plan establishes the Distinct's "sartdmd of service" in order to ascertain the DlsWO's Costal and future capacity. The Super'mlendent of Public lnstinetion establishes squme nonage guidelines for capcity, hat Neu guidelines do not take into consideration the education program ands. The Dishict has identified a Building Pongrsm Gpecity (or earls of Ne nhools in the District This PWI Time Pqulvedem (M) capacity is baud on. The number ofcassroums avail ablein oath srthml Any special nximmmena m each school In general, the District's content target class sin provides had the average Gass sire for a ataMaid classoom fm grades X thmngh 2 slmuld be N atuder a. For grant 3-5 the target is 25 students. In sixty and seventh grade the students are ttheduled with black itatmedon and ass only two lewhers for can curriculum. Teachers at this level we W students per day. At eighth grade the teachers will we 9d etmknts per day. fier gales 9- 12 the target class size is 26 smtlerm • In the 2h05r06 whool year, all of the n elementary mimoa offer a least one all day Kindergarten. This pm@arn does have capacity impoem, as she cassmom is only available for one session of Kindergarten forthernll day. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCUDHIB M7 GP[YAL FACILITIES PLAN . BUILDMG PROGRAM CAPACPCIm ELRMRNTARYBUILDING MIDDLESCHINOLBUDALYG PROGRAMCAPACITY PRDGRAM CAPACITY Headcon't FIE _hl n Ughless l32 412 Hll? rov: e al = ]4,,kTWl,, 44M 444 ]w,0121h H111 -U7- 4-17 all K'Ar 379 Ms) Vim 3" t,,,LaJ,a 132 412 sfl?Lske SM'smst 40,1 TW,t IN) 4n -?7 W5 355 listionantau vva8 Nrv¢ ScINOINa Heaccowl PIT Dlalre 999 A L Lakes na 69i d7ol 0 Holm ns =wa PuMicAMem zlz 314 20%mAl sarJ .e.aga RBMDRIIIG PROGRAM CAPACITY APACITY ScLml Haw Hgdcwol PIE DvaPU 1]69 1 FMml way 10.56 1 .!HI jeffergso LOS 1519 TWd B,,,,, CHI I'll" T Hi ScM1Od 1Bp Lq Paleni Pudic Arakm Way IA 13l 2006 rCT OiAL 5$H 610 ALTERNATIi SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY SMOdNane HPa3coum FP5 Mcnl SaM1ml 16 16 EW6 TOTAL 16 16 F"I"'! way Public Atalevy larmily is nN reset in ca1cuh6il",age. ^T lan High Scowl npxily is nd amiin calculaw araaage A 13 • FHUBtpL WAY PIBW S ppwdgS 21XV](DlM ?, AA(MI IMS N Portable ]Locations The Washington State Constitution mquires the Slaw to provide each student a basic education It's not an efficient us of District resurms b buildashool with acalexityfor 5W students due to lack of space for 25 students when eomllment fluctuates mmughout the year and fnum year to year. Portables are used as temporary faclides of mtedm ou ums to [rouse smdenm unlit permanent facilities can be built or boundary adlustments cal be mark. When Ixnnenm[ facilities become available, the pmtsbll is either used fm omerpmposes such as alomissor child care programs, m moved to samhec schund for an interim classroom. Some pnuffldws may not be fit in move due m age or physical condition. In mss cases, the District may choose to buy new parables aM surplus these unfit parsdaws, it is the pcactim and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are net acceptable as pemanent facilities. • The following page provides a list of she location of me portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. • 14 FFDLIKAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1 CAPITAL FACILTBW PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS • ATSENIORMGM R MlCk L PORTABLES LOCATED ATSUPPORTFACILITIFS - - - G Rier Vim 3 3 2 2 j ]TEADSTARTFORTABLIFSATDMIUCTRUPES Twin La? =2 1 W? F l? I K L 1 32 T PORTABLES LOCATED AT EOODLE SCHBUIZ 0 PORTABLES LOCAT56 AT EL&NENTARY SCHOOLS • F®IB[AL WAY PUBLIC SCNOOIS 31007 CAPITAL PACHATEM PLAN SNdenl FOrecaR Studentemolhoentpmjectionsamabasicwmp matofbudgetdevelopmat. F llmena projections iMueace many of the financial evarreafes that go into budget preparation. The Majority of sing requimaams are derived directly from the forxasled number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected compared Other eepcvditums and certsin avenue larol ins as daUlY reducer' ro emrollment projections. Enrollment pmjectiana are completed annually in flue Business Services Department. FrojecOmu mast be detailed at various levels, district total, school-btdlding totals, pace level and program level to include vecatimed aM special education students. The basis of pmicctions has been rodent vaerval analysis. Cohmt survival is five Analysis of a group Nanas a wrwwn aariaticai valce (grade IeveU as iI lmsgmsses through tines. Ina stable population the cohort world be LOG for all pales. This analysis was historical infomutionmdevelopavemgesandprojccttbeavemgdfomw . Tltismcflmddoesnot • rare individual smMne; it is corueerrtW with aggegate numbers in each grade level The distinct has used Nis method with varying yeas of history and weighted factors to study Because[rensfasthmd rm of the school srsrem arecomawq stu0.il[ sevendfarejechose migration is factored into the Analysis as it increases wdecreases survival rams. Entrygrades Qdndrdamid we a unique problem in conon reafic A. 96e district collects inforn ation on birth rates within the districYS cxmsus hells, and [taws these statistics as a wbost for handerganen rnmliment in the appropriate yeas. The Federal Way School District is using various waistmal method far projecting student enmllnlents. The resultant forecasted enmllmems are evaluated below. The first mehod is a statistical abort analysis that produces ten distinct fmccasfs. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending M the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using At enrollment pmjmbon software passage that allows the user to lxoject independen0y at sepal or grade level and to aggregate Nero projections for the district level. Jbe Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including rand line, standard grade progressivist (whom) and combinations of these ntdhais. This wflwaa produces a five year pmjedion of ash and enrollment In November of 2001, the District ceno-ded a demographer to develop projections forNe • Fedeal Way School Diarist. The minor was complete in January 2001 The nablel road or forecast next year's enrollment was courant survival mars to rreas=grde to Bade growth. 16 FPDFIIAL WAY PUBIJC SCHOOLS 3 CAMAL FACWTIESP N Means market shaze losses to pdvme schools (consistent with comity-wide average), ones growth from roan Ioming wlosus due to ret loses form migration. This furecas[ was providW as a range of Wee pmjclons. The long-rage American provided with this report used a model with cohort survival ones and growth muss bash on projecml changes in the5-19agegmupfor King County. Momoftheme sit lforlongmngeemollment mpmting assume that enmlhoenr is aconsmm pemenl ofsomeN else (e.g. popWation) or that enrollment will mirror some pmject treMforme of p-sge population ova time. The schinal reportincluded5differenthis is Mad to providearangee ofposslb pietween M,O for Inc District to year to 15Th is el pro m s range on that is between des a r reaand 26,000 when applied d to the low, m edium ond high h range modes. This provides a sonable range for long-ange planning and is den consistent with estimates from various models. The Distdet will wntract with an independent derwgmpherm update them pryxnotu after Inc Octohcr 12006 erualWmtcowm. [wgange pxojections that establish the reed for fmlHfies are a modification of the cohort sarih a method The cohort method of analysis becomes less teliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long tango ptojcfiora ave sniff eA annually. The study includes inforrmation from thejunsdictiatml demogisphem as they project future housing and population in the vagina. The long-range projections us d by Federal Way Public Schools tenet a similar age Imad in shadent populations as tie pmjectiov fe"ished by the Office of Financial Management for the Some of Washington. Near tetrn projections assume acme growth fiom new hotwng, which is offset by cunen localeconomiang range planning assumes s a as snewdevelo rem tmncil new h Housiousingg co ndimeions. Lang [anal mrkm yield f firom p propossed ne condiment with niamricm gowth fattens_ Growth Management requites jurisdictions W plan her arrmdmutn of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a gamer in in is planning with the vanous jurisdictions comprising the seHonl distnct geography. These pmjec[ions create a vision of the school district Community in the future. C • 17 PEOmR WAY PIMLIC SCH0OM20V CA TAL FACIUMS K" Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Sinmlilad Rf (K Hmk -,5 rTe; MiMI Sd IFl>r_99NUkvunl; 5emor HiO FIE- 9f5N0Jmw1) ixtl%-I2 P. 11,600 5M glla 21$83 2W2 ""2 5}37 4,J 7 21,102 Hp3 2 03 ? n? 5454 4,437 21,091 2103L0 9,127 5,520 6,008 , 2005 2WCLS qj? 5,473 6,515 21 152 2N505 9,105 Sim k7M 207 6288402 X937 5,M2 7,W5 21,0W 2W8 PM7" 9,134 RPM, 2,0SI 21150 2009 92p 4I5 49" 2L192 2010 P2B0¢lB 9,386 I, 9 022 21¢0 2011 LN10.1) 9,592 SHB C672 21y82 2012 0011-13 9,589 5,121 ;pS 21182 8013 9,411 5,222 6.714 2I550 n'MC..FBw:.y E..,..?c-s me®.sme4a 1?su,w Blz E` s n LI 5 z 18 sam v.., FFDOIAL WAY PUBWC SC WISMC TA PACItAY1F$PL4N Caoaclty Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Scalar High Schools M Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast irdorrmuon. The result demomeaies lite myuirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a nud for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organism in spreadsheet format, wait a page summanzing the entire District, and then evaluating capxity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and seater ingh levels individually. The in" at the honour of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place cadsS .. • • 19 PEDO WAYPORLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL RACHrreS PLAN CAMOTY SUMMARY -ALL GRAPES Rm¢r1 - d zo02 xW8 aCU9 2010 2011 zo¢ 2012 cnew IT somdY? modes zomdoe zooame 11 zao9rlo NII zoIdu 201 v1z za1v12 I BVILDMG PRIXiRAM IIFAUCOIfMCAPACHY 21}01 21z95 21249 21 D] 21.193 21.07 21$39 Add m skmct v'hmgm w aaPa?iry Sl ml wwsdm came] 1m Cgxh'IP ]Wy Hi68 7 0 ) 21?7 21 ? 9 21X3 21.191 21.199 21$32 21,97 ENROLLMF.M Hauc PlEk¢o1MlW 21.024 21150 21.192 212N11 211ffi 22? 01,5A IoluW AO4my FmoOsm lAAfh) 28tl 288 >86 286 288 288 288 ? • '' SORPLUSOR(IINROVS® ) dnMPONLkV?`l 2,515 2'm 2.725 2,225 2n5 2]25 2462 AJdI8u6van Ppgpk(ipcry ANN Ncw PMdk CSpu y = OMGPmhbk Glairy - - SURPLVEORIIMHOUSRD) PROGMAM AHDRELOGTAHLE • I 20 bEOERAL WAY POBWC 9CHO0I$CAPf(ALYACIWIE9 PIAN 0 CAPACP(Y KMM Y- BLEMBNTARY$CNOOI& Bmi6¢ . lhlM Yw 100) 2W8 2O'JD 2010 2011 2012 2012 CAPACITY $IINAYw 2 07 2CO7 6T8 M" 2W9110 MINZI 2011/12 201L13 I PROGRAM ll }IEADco COUNf CppgVT1V 10,014 9986 9,952 9,936 9910 9,910 9,910 L er¢m w,br C m (20 #?? 04) 020 AJptlei PSOpapNevkuae CapyYy 9,988 9,9$2 9,936 9,910 9,910 9910 $910 RNROLL w Puic FlEEmallmoJ 2lgdmfAdel®y(MPPEJ 8.937 32 9130 32 9,289 32 9186 32 9,502 32 9,$89 32 9,614 BMPLUS OR OO88p) BRLOCATABLECAPAMW 3. QmmlP wCaptily AJtlI$ubuatl 1.mleb], p ay 1,3511 I.IW I,3g1 1,)00 L3W 1,300 1,31p 911RPLVsoitii iuro d PBOCRAM ANOAELOCAPABLC I. I1ko =Pdipti [ wrmm1,11 ogPPmgm¢ o ¢tloc¢W S urluleo6m mchyt, W, IodOJ ? m Oc xhool )cars i oml 2 1n1enxl AOiemy lprzj¢tiopS btl do ml full low ¢q o(xhoolf lilies. 3 Rekabblc Capcity baal on dwn o(poeud4 aeaLbkaM OIM eAO mslnliv 5¢hnvry¢which can be mNloupgpaiilyhwxmtlents?aW ?oeoen?(ecilai¢ae rva3abk. Thu iS ecsluJaeiuwlxrodY3MxoW numb¢o(psubMS OulwJl be vetl wLMbaseJmetlualawdenelvpJatinoenk, The Dabctn IY UdmpWI pSGW¢ficm Jq hWnxtinmiimrnlmy nge anJCOmitionoflhe POmb1¢ wJl Jtlamirc fesvlnhlymrmm:nnN woucnoml ou. 21 • FFD"A1. WAY PVBWC S WN MCAPITA FAfDATFSPIA CAPACYTYJ MMARY-MIDDLESML IS I_ llm A®detrrySM[n mi 111J wry%ctlima56Ndoam rcgaue fall m m ofx wl fxiliti 3. RckcaMble CalacirybLaad em the maMer nfpnubl[5 nailableaoE OWUaMUniso-anve tecbniqueawhi3 can ECUVdm mrpwmlyhaoxslwlMSamJ fernpceat fa[iGlvs me vvaJable ltua is a cakolattL amdermJY. Thex I m MpSGMes Mn wil he uxdwill be bx lja imaclaal, po tl Le Wbicl my EryprmpJlFmubles fiwnrbe irw.tiqulrnrwy Ag, A&c evJwtlilim if WCpNables will delem?(avb0ly (mcmmnvl wmetimal me. 3. Cagciryfaoobw5b 51Wcoti wi116caccmnMalcEavirL traveling leecMnazd voplamogl®e msomecla, rr¢ 0 FEDERAL WAY PURLIC 9CIIOOm CAPITAL FACHSIES PLAN - CAPACITY SUDIMARY -SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS RWBn - Imp," CA d Yeax 2W7 "S 2X3 2010 NIII 2012 2012 VAPA= Schwl Year 2 7 2W36b8 2X8/X 2X9110 20HWII 2011/12 2012113 BV JNGPROCRAM HFABCOIWIL ACITY 5,824 5,824 5824 5.624 U 624 TmrO, ,¢xe FM,ml FMenl WOay 11 i6M1 &hwl t Adj dPm®aoaHe tCally 5,824 5,824 5824 5.824 6,624 6NHOWImm Ba6c Flb Ewol t L lomnl AademYlnnFP? 7,W5 164 7,057 Ibi 6,999 IW 4925 164 G)42 164 bd'R 161 6,314 164 SBRPI.BS OR (IINIIOUSED R ATABLE CAPACITY 2. O Pm bk Cagnty J. Addrcwporobknlmry 475 30G 675 6)5 68 675 675 675 SIAUNX OR(IINNOUSCP) PROGRAM ANDRHLOCATARLE NOMS. 1_ Idenet ACadermawdeANMe i U" mprolatuo%Wlaowl rtquuc lull two IfWc l(acili0 2. Rebaubk Capi ryix6aaedon Ne nurofpxOLks arailabk wJ dhn Wnunis6ativeanMlgve¢wbich cwbc utmblenYUr' ly 6w¢exmtlrnnwlJ pemorevl facilities areanibbk.lIDxuaeakukad muxbermJy. T6eamW nomberolporubkslNr will6e cW WO be BaxM waceulsndrallupukuonneed. The Disuicta®ybepob Wll lwrublexfiao LLe uullucJON imeolay. AgeaM Cwdilicn olNe larmblrs willdeblmrc! biliq fircwtimctlmmuctiwW Oae. 3. AM Fw bkCryc" 4. CapaiLy(wuWa¢ctlsoMnmanO M agonwWaled wi16 rtavelbg IeacMx mtl uo plam? Ns io amc ckacmn2 Pugns?wJ mar COlkge nm.xeapp,rt:inmtely XOlxne wWUSea x6?a®b. 23 • I• FPDOUL WAYP U[CSCf1O01S bars CANTAL PACE ITItleS PLAN K' Comedy. liseCity, fFederal Way, dike C' fKen Its Fee CalcW Single and Multi-Familylieaidences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires thip devtlopms pay does fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school ficdlitics. To determine an "unable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be food in King County Code 21A and was suhstndirdly adopted by the City of Federal Way and heat The formula raptites the Fasted to establish a "SNdevt Gerwration Fame" which estimates how many students will be added as a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and in gather come wondered construction costs, which are tritium to that distrct - STI1DENf GENERA'11ON FAC RANALYSIS P rid Way Public Schools stoked generation factor was deremNxJ separately for single- hardly units and multi-family units. The factors uwd in the 200"7 Capital Facilities Plan were • derived using actual generation factors from single -family units (last were cors[maed in the feet five (5) gars. -1 MPA(T FFL CAI.CUI.ATION Following the calculations for the student Formation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single hardly and multR6mlly units based on King County Cade 21A and the Growth Management Act. ? Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ? Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the ]set school site purchased] (site 45); this is nego6audi purchase pries. Plan Year 200'1 Plan year 2" Single Family Units $3,018. $3,393. Muthparody Units $856. $895. • 24 6 y3y d G? 00 Z ' ga A s; ? a ?a m^ ?? gorR a ?d °R^ s„ 8 ° . vSLL HF?e^ 8°°B C mm ° S`. ' ^ a ?$ c AA zmw - EF ?& t ell " - s ? e ~ • oeo 6 a ` o a 3 10 osa a 3 e y? A • • • PFDEIIAL WAYF LIC BGNWS 3UIp C)RTIAL PAMY111o PLAN • Q ACT FUt & Slle Amo 4 Cn¢ spgrnl SnWnl vliry Cou/ FvNiry Fxvr Fa[? Cm/ Awes • SFB MFR sl? MFR Y NeAMO N S Cw bmcaa: SUMM MRI %Fo FwJ P F hly Fw" Fxw Cow (Av TOWS A ( o W MF M SIM M FX U M, _96W% m _ _ 417 0.3291 OIIRI m a MNEIxSAr.A _9608% $19.]5?95fi _ ___ 001x3 13j5 5810 Sr1MpF 9QW8 128,48W] 933 ___ 02264 _ 0p98 56,]66 Sx,a92 IViAL MSxw Temp FwWyCmL So swbu %TmpF FWiM, Fxi4y Fa CaN 4 x rm s &M SR MIR sm MR Ixorn.Y 39 % m _ _ o3 n1 0.115 m m MtlNx Stliwl _J92A 5U 25 011M UM23 m m Sr IGFp ]M% SIEB.IM 5 Oxx65 0094 SM $[[a lVl'AL flb fla • BWe MaIaYVSCreNIGImWim: Slutlml Sndrn BmAf?aV Sq. FY Fxaw Cm/ oWm1 Mad SFR MFR SEA MR MamMVy _ SISAIR _ 9U 01 121 m $U MiNIOSOW SISAx2 . IO .. OW% 0IT Ief __ 0.45 m m N SRIP41: SISJb IJ '.?. 0A g __ _.... UJK94 32.81$ m66 l cW 33015 f8R ax Paymol CrrhI GRWVIian M]M V0. (AM[Rm61 6m S 55 CwWBOM Merzn Ram (APA9p5) _ V0. _9% 9 0. NuF Md VN MAw Dwlh.g _ 5 I_9N.x6/ _ fCEl 2< 0 Ywa MMWM _ _ 10 _ 164 A°m^s'3S`le`y RO" 61.10. 5111 P:w.a Vela MRermue5lmm f2 )8 65x5 1w5]e FVw1) MWFPVmtlY Rnihax'a R ? MATS, S mon v AgWMm Coo R ap $ 739 5 192 F[muoml FraLryCOV $ 2% 10.x90. S ;9 Tmpay FZRVYCO+ 5 1 $ N SaeMadCMb 1 5 M.91p s ( ) RAFapm Oegl 1 R 5 525 SR5 SL 5 (kM 6.0.M 5 L5 W% La,] aI SM1Ve t 3,018 1 9 856 6 8 3.M9 I 8% • 26 OP] ____m ____ 11] 0.1891 OI131 50 m _ 9? sq]q _ OIH3 U.dR3 5393 588 130 51'>1}3J 133 OYt64 __ aW98 5356 $109 RoTA], my fln • FEDERAL WAY PUIR CS OOLS 211P7 CAPITAL FACW Eat PLAN SECFION4 SDMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 20] Capital Facilities Flan is au updated document, based an the 21106 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2006 Plan and the 2DYf Plan are listed below. SECFION I -TILE CAPITAL FACRIfIFS PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Maurice Plan has ban rolled fohwmd in reflect 200712013 CAPACITY Mementary school capacity reflects puguarx changes for the 2005/07 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kinderganen programs at every elementary school. Building Progum Capacities arefamd on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables retlsta the movenheut of potables between facilities m new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STGDEN'T FORECAST The Student Forecastnow«vem20o7h gh2Ol3. EnrWlment M1istory and lnoj«tona me found on page 18. CAPACITY SDMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student founwaid. New wheals and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases m capacity. Capacity Summons are found on pages 20.23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The houses Fee Calculations have changed doe to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2" Capital Facilities Plan and the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. • 27 • FRDO[AI. WAY RIBLtC SCN0O132[IOY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FM CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Smdont Generation factors am basal on raw for new developments co mewled overa period of not motefew five }cars prior to the date of Clio fee calculation. The changes in student Generatted factors between the 20116 wPtal Facilities Plan and the 2007Capitail Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the, year placed in the survey The Stanford Genemfion woodsheu is found on page 25. SITE ACOUISHRON COSTS The ragotiamd purchase price for the Todd Beaver lEgp School shoe was $NTaM per aces. fwd edoeFederalbaselirecostfmacreagefof$cyuoyeh,d School. assessN valuation for the Way PublicAcademy ]and was$5211atNetimeof of pmehue. Thecalculated cost peracre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using doe $80,W0 pe arte ba dae cost am the assessed valuation at the time of purchases for the FedeM Way Public Acadmy. Federal Way Public N% a omsite. The grade span for this facihtY is grade &IO. Middle school accounts for for (A% of NecoaLwinner high is 40%. • Selumyah: 20 x$80,000= $1,GI81,OOp FWPA $ 312900(60% f$52150018 news of 3 were gravel Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $],912,9002].8=$81,949 coat per acre Savior High FNPA $ 208600(40% of1521.500, 1 2 acres of 3 acre expect) CosuAcreego $M,00/l.2=$193,833castperaere SCHOOL CONSTRUCHON WSTS The rnst forlAde d Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921594. The Fcdcml Way Nbhc Academycosts are split 60% to middle school and 40%m senor high in the impactlWcaknialima Middle school cmnseudinn costs =60%of $4,921594 $2,952,956 FWPA $154000Se9uoyah ToW Cast $18,352,956 The mud cast farreplacing Federal Way Jhgy School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 150 to 24W studentsThe Impact Hoe calculation used ox -third, $29m as no basis for capacity increases a high school. High school examination costs = mrd, of $4,921594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,00,000 Fcdmd Way High • Total Cost $2$968,639 28 • F®FRAL WAY PV6llC 5CHOOLS.SW] CAPITAL PACII.IYMES PLAN HvIPACF FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM20(167020 BAPACT PEH Item FemNTo Comment Percent ofPCtmv¢nt Facilities %6.6oto%.08% Re A#3QPl Pmcnt Temporary Facilities 3.40[03.92% Updaed portable inventory Avmge Cog of Portable $82,151 m$128,106 Updatedavmgeofpmtables Cla a xnro purchased and placed in 2005 BoxkC Sq. Ft $129.61 to $154.22 Charge per QSPI Some Mamh 599]%(No CTangc) Average Asxessed Value SFR- Pun Puget Sound Educational $22[,943 to 1215,644 Servim District(ESD 121) MFR- $53,384W$SJ,873 Capital Bord lou ttRam 4.52%to439% Market Raw Pmpeity Tax LCvy Rate $I04 to $1.14 ifin%COUnry Tmaaury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elemenray 3138 to3 M Middle School .1632 to.2013 High School .1695 to 2013 Male-Family Student Yield Uplmed Housing Inventory Elementary .11910 .0929 Middle school .0,12 t0.0410 High School .053 m.MM '.. 0 29 CITY OF * Memorandum k1.// B V R N WASHINGTON TO: Community, Trade, and Economic Development Department FROM: Public Works and Planning, Building, & Community Departments RE: Final Amendments to Comprehensive Transportation Plan DATE: November 29, 2006 The final 2006 amendments to the Comprehensive Transportation Plan are identified below. The Planning and Community Development Committee approved the staff recommendations without further changes. The Public Works Committee requested the following three changes. 1. Add language describing the need to rehabilitate the pavement on 15th Street SW at the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. 2. Correct the route descriptions for the MT 564/565. 3. Changes the language in policies TR-82 and TR-83 to include the phrase "equivalent agreements" rather than "equivalent procedures." In addition, the proposed description of a new collector or arterial from 15th Street SW to Stewart Road has been deleted due to infeasibility. 2006 AMENDMENTS Chapter 1: Introduction Figure 1-2 (Progress Since Last Transportation Plan): Show Lake Tapps Parkway, Sumner Tapps Hwy East, and 8th Street SE/Stewart Road as Principal Arterials, in order to be consistent with the Functional Classification Map (Figure 2-1). Chapter 2: Street System • Text Change, pg. 2-6, 2nd full paragraph The City expects that the majority of regional trips would will take place on state highways. However, recognizing that trips through the City are sometimes necessary, Auburn has designated a network of north-south and east-west corridors as truck routes, which are built to truck standards. In addition, the City has designated future truck routes, which will These Mutes aFe to be built to truck standards whenever opportunities exist to reconstruct the roadway network, either through public improvement projects or through agreements with private developers. Table 2-3 (Future Roadway Improvement Projects and Cost Estimates): Remove the 3rd Street SE/Cross Street SE (Map No. 6), A Street Loop (Map No. 7), and C Street NW (Map No. 9) projects as they are completed or will be completed this year. • Figure 2-2 (Daily Traffic Volumes): Update the map to include 2006 traffic counts. ¦ Figure 2-3 (Speed Limits): Show the speed limit on AWN from E Main to 5th St NE. • Figure 2-4 (Truck Routes): Modify the map to show roads currently designated as truck routes but that are not built to truck standards as future truck routes. Designate the private haul road from A Street SE to R Street SE as a future truck route, as identified in the City Council Vision 2016, map #47. Add a future truck route along the portion of R Street SE/Kersey Way from the private haul road to the Auburn Pit. ¦ Figure 2-7 (Roadway Improvement Alternatives): • Show the future 6th Street SE to Auburn Way S grade separation as connecting to SR 18 at the western termini. • Modify the alignment of the Evergreen Way SE extension so it terminates at the intersection of 53rd Street SE & Kersey Way. • Show the SR 167 and SR 164 labels more clearly; they are currently obscured by future project lines. • Remove the 3rd Street SE/Cross Street SE (Map No. 6), A Street Loop (Map No. 7), and C Street NW (Map No. 9) projects and renumber map accordingly. Freight Section - Text Addition (p. 2-6, after discussion of M Street Grade Separation.) • The pavement at the crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad at 15th Street SW is in very poor condition. Rehabilitation of the pavement is a hiah nrioritv for the Citv_ SW to the railroad tracks. Chapter 3: Non-Motorized Transportation ¦ Remove A Street SE Trail project from Plan with the following changes. The Auburn Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan identifies specific projects for the development of local and regional trails. The A Street SE a Rd Street Auburn- Pacific trails will provide a multi-use paths that improves access from the southern city limits to downtown. A planned pedestrian crossing, under the BNSF railroad tracks just north of the White River Bridge, will improve the regional trail system by providing a connection to the City of Pacific. Funding is still needed for the White River Trail connection to the A Street SE Tall and the north Auburn section of the Green River Trail. Private development may help fund a portion of the two-mile segment of the Green River Trail. (p. 3-6) • A new trail connections along ° Street SE C Street SW will provide pedestrians and cyclists with a safer connection to downtown and the Transit Center. (p. 3-13) Table 3-4 (Future Trail and Bicycle Facility Projects): • Remove the A Street Trail from the project list due to infeasibility. Renumber the remaining projects accordingly. • Change the name of the C Street SE Trail to the "Auburn-Pacific". 2 ¦ Figure 3-3 (Future Trail & Bicycle Network): Remove the A Street Trail from the project list due to infeasibility. Renumber the remaining projects accordingly. Revise the alignment of the Auburn-Pacific Trail (formerly the C Street SE Trail). Chapter 4: Transit ¦ Existing Transit Services (pgs. 4-1 to 4-4): Modify the following route descriptions to reflect Metro Transit route changes that will go into effect in September 2006, as well as Sound Transit express bus service changes that occurred in early 2006. (pgs. 4-2 & 4-4) Seattle. 16th StFeet NW PaFk and-Ride, the KeRt TFansit Center, the Regional justiGe (Replaced with new MT 180 route.) Route 161 effeFs daily SeP?!Ge to Auburn aRd SE Aubum from the Auburn T-FaRro Seater: (Discontinued.) • Route 152 runs weekday peak hour service between 61aw, the Auburn Transit Center, the 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride, Star Lake Park-and-Ride (1-5/S 272nd Street) and downtown Seattle. steps. Route 167 effeFs weekday seFVOGe ftem the AubUFR 15th StFeet NW PaFk and Rode PaFk aRd Rode, 139eiRg iR ReRtOR, KeRRy dale, Goal GFeek, the Newport Hills aRd (This route will no longer operate in Auburn.) Hupurn zjtavon, ana Kent Station/ l ransit center until 1:00 am meeting the MT 150, with service to and from Seattle at Kent Station During expanded peak hours (northbound approximately 3:00 - 8:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., southbound approximately 5:15 - 7:15 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. - 6:15 p.m.), Route 180 also serves Sea-Tac Airport and the Burien Transit Center. • Rode, (Discontinued route. Replacement service offered on the new MT 919 route.) Center, the Auburn Senior GenteF, the Auburn King County LibFaFy, the Dogwood aFea, and southeast . (Discontinued route. Replacement service offered on the new MT 919 route.) • Route 915 provides weekday peak hour service, scheduled to meet the Sounder Commuter Rail trains at Auburn Station as well as weekday midday service between the Auburn Transit Center and Enumclaw via Auburn Way South and SR 164. 60 minutes between approximately 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays and between approximately 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Saturdays Route 919 also provides Bial- a-ride service to north and south Auburn and to the Auburn Senior Center. 3 • Route 564/565 offers daily weekday, limited stop service between the Federal Way Transit Center-(565 only), South Hill Transit Center (564 only) the South Hill Park & Ride (564 only), the Sumner Station (564 only the Auburn Transit Center, the Kent Transit Center, the Renton Transit Center, and the Bellevue Transit Center, and the Overlake Transit Center. SumneF TF?RG*t GenteF, ?he sout? Hill PaFk and Ride, the South Hill Mail, the SR 512 PaFk and- Rude, and the Lakewood TFaRsit . ¦ Transit System Recommendations (pgs 4-10 to 4-11): Recommend Metro Transit expand the MT 152 to all-day, dual-direction service between Auburn and Seattle. ¦ Figure 4-1 (Existing Transit Serving Auburn): Update map to show Metro route changes that went into effect in September 2006, as noted in description changes above. ¦ Figure 4-2 (Transit Dependent Areas): Update map to show Metro route alignment changes that went into effect in September 2006, as noted in description changes above. ¦ Figure 4-3 (Transit and Major Trip Generators): Update map to show Metro route alignment changes that went effect in September 2006, as noted in description changes above. Chapter 5: Policies TR-5: The City will Encourage the use of trails and other connections that provide ease of travel within and between neighborhoods, community activity centers, and transit services. Development patterns that block direct pedestrian access are discouraged. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate non-motorized transportation on arterials, collectors, and local roads. TR-6: The City shall Thoroughly evaluate the impacts of all transportation projects and apply appropriate mitigation measures in conformance with SEPA, the Critical Areas Ordinance, and other city, county, state, and federal regulations. TR-9: The City of AubUFR will Ensure that the transportation system meets the requirements outlined in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In addition, the City will work towards providing a multi- modal transportation system that ensures mobility for all residents, particularly those without access to or the ability to drive a vehicle. TR-11: The term "below level-of-service" shall apply to situations where traffic attributed to a development likely results in any of the following. a. An unacceptable increase in hazard or decrease in safety on a roadway. b. An accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements. c. An unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an intersection where two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector network. d. An increase in congestion which constitutes an unacceptable adverse environmental impact under the State Environmental Policy Act. 4 e. A reduction in any of the three (3) LOS standards below. 1. Arterial and Collector Corridor LOS: The level-of-service standard for each arterial and collector corridor is "D", unless otherwise specified in Chapter 2 of this plan. The City may require a developer to examine a shorter or longer corridor segment than is specified in Chapter 2, to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 2. Signalized Intersection LOS: The City may require a developer to examine individual signalized intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 3. Unsignalized Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for these intersections, measured as if they were signalized, shall be level of service "D". If LOS falls below the standard, analysis and mitigation may be required in a manner commensurate with the associated impacts. This may include, among other requirements, conducting a traffic signal warrant analysis and installing or financing a signal. TR-15: The O+ty will Evaluate +ts city transportation facilities annually to determine compliance with the adopted level-of-service standards and, as necessary, amend the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) to remedy identified deficiencies. TR-16: Coordinate transportation improvements with the State, Counties, and neighboring jurisdictions to encourage through trips to occur on state facilities, reducing stress on the city street network. TR-17: The City shall Gentinue to Require developers to construct transportation systems needed to serve new developments. TRA8: The Gity should GGI;t*Rue to Actively pursue the formation of Local Improvement Districts (LID) to upgrade existing streets and construct new streets to the appropriate standard. TR-23: The-Sity Maintains a traffic impact fee system based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) guidelines, as modified by the City Council, as a means of enabling development to mitigate appropriately for associated traffic impacts. TR-25: The City see Ln Enhance the livability of Auburn through a variety of mechanisms, including the innovative design and construction of roadways and associated facilities. The City shall Apply design standards that result in attractive and functional transportation facilities. TR-30: The City, thFOugh the Auburn PoliGe Department, should Emphasize enforcement of the "rules of the road" for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists whose actions endanger others. This enfoFGe should be conduoted Conduct enforcement in a manner that reinforces the messages found in non- motorized education & safety programs. TR-32: The City shall Encourage the use of high-occupancy vehicles (buses, carpool, and vanpool) through both private programs and under the direction of Metro Transit. TR-33: The City shall Promote reduced employee travel during the daily peak travel periods through flexible work schedules and programs to allow employees to work part-time or full-time or at alternate work sites closer to home. TR-34: The City shall Encourage employers to provide TDM measures in the workplace through such programs as preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles, improved access for transit vehicles, and employee incentives for using high-occupancy vehicles. 5 TR-35: In making funding decisions, Awn shall consider transportation investments that support transportation demand management approaches by providing alternatives to single-occupant vehicles, such as transit, bikeways and pedestrian paths. TR-36: The Oity will Lead by example through implementation of a thorough and successful Commute- Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City employees. TR-41: The City Encourages park & ride lots on sites adjacent to compatible land uses with convenient access to the Auburn Transit Station, SR 18, SR 167, and all regional transportation corridors. TR-42: The City will Work proactively with Sound Transit, WSDOT, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to ensure the adequate supply of park & ride capacity in Auburn. TR-44: TheGity will Preserve and protect existing right-of-way through the issuance of permits such as ROW Use permits and franchise and public way agreements, by monitoring and responding to right-of- way encroachments and safety impacts, and by limiting vacations of public right-of-way. TR-45: The Slty-will Establish programs and schedules for the level and frequency of roadway and non- motorized system maintenance. TR-47: The-S+tywill Establish standards of street repair and seek to obtain sufficient financing to attain and maintain a safe system in good condition. TR-48: The City will Continue to implement the "Save Our Streets" program for maintenance and rehabilitation of local streets. TR-49: The S+ty will Create an arterial streets maintenance and rehabilitation program, including development of an implementation timeline and strategy, for arterial and collector streets in Auburn. TR-58: The Gity shall Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of arterial designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. TR-59: The Gity shall Designate new arterials to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Arterials shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. TR-61 : The Gity shall Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of collector designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. TR-62: The Gity shall Designate new collectors to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Collectors shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. TR-67: Private streets are discouraged, but may be permitted them on a discretionary basis, as regulated by city code and the Auburn Design Standards. TR-70: The City will Seek consolidation of access points to state highways, arterials, and collectors. This will benefit the highway and city street system, reduce interference with traffic flows on arterials, and discourage through traffic on local streets. To achieve this level of access control, the City: TR-71: The Gity shall Continue to coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation to facilitate the movement of traffic through the City. 6 TR-72: The City shall Encourage the State and Counties to develop through routes, which minimize the impact of through traffic on Auburn's residential neighborhoods. TR-73: Actively solicit action by the State and Counties to program and construct those improvements needed to serve Auburn to the state and county arterial and freeway systems. TR-74: The Gity shall develop aR_d Implement the City's a traffic calming program that provides eppoFtun+ties to improve neighborhood safety and neighbOFheed quality. TR-80: The G+ty well Seek public and private partners to leverage funds for freight improvement projects and associated mitigation. TR-81: Continue to work with the Freight Mobility Roundtable, FastCast, and other local and regional groups to ensure regional needs are met, and local impacts are mitigated. TR-82: (Split into the following 2 policies.) The City has developed a tFUGk mute , found in GhapteF 2 of this plan, whiGh identifies designated tFUGk routes in . • All through truck trips and the majority of local trips shall take place on the designated truck routes, as identified on the truck route map in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This policy shall not apply to developments and uses operating under existing right- of-way use permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements directly related to the regulation of permitted haul routes. ¦ The Gity shall Work towards designing and constructing these serridors designated future truck routes, as identified on the truck route map in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, to sustain routine truck traffic. TR-83: Local truck trips that have origins and/or destinations in Auburn may have to sometimes use routes not designated as truck routes. The City may approve the use of alternate routes not currently designated as truck routes for truck traffic with appropriate mitigation Approval may be made through issuance of right-of-way use permits traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements. tFUGk tFips, so a6 not to impair the eGGRE)MOG vitality of !E)Gal bus' TR-84: The City will seek to Development shall be required to mitigate the impacts of construction generated truck traffic on the City's transportation system, based on the City's LOS standard. TR-86: . Truck traffic in residential neighborhoods shall be prohibited, except for local deliveries within said neighborhood unless no other possible route is available, in which case mitigation may be required TR-88: Auburn s#all Implement land use regulations and encourage site design that promotes non- motorized forms of transportation. TR-89: Auburn shall Include the role of non-motorized transportation in all transportation planning, programming, and if suitable, capital improvement projects. Plan for continuous non-motorized circulation routes afe planned within and between existing, new or redeveloping commercial, residential, and industrial developments. Transportation planning shall seek to allow pedestrians and bicyclists the ability to cross or avoid barriers in a manner that is safe and convenient. 7 TR-91: The City shall Actively seek to acquire land along corridors identified for future trail development in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Auburn Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Plan 2005. TR-92: AubUFR should Schedule, plan and co-sponsor events that support recreational walking and bicycling. These events should emphasize their recreational and health values and introduce people to the transportation capabilities of bicycling and walking. TR-93: The City shall Improve and protect the non-motorized transportation system through the establishment of level-of-service goals for non-motorized facilities and through maintenance and preservation of the existing system. TR-94: (Split into the following 4 policies.) ¦ Developing and maintaining the non-motorized system, including bike routes, walkways and equestrian paths, to encourage significant recreational use. ¦ Develop and maintain the non-motorized system including bike routes sidewalks and multi- use paths in a manner that promotes non-motorized travel as a viable mode of transportation ¦ ALibUFR shall Develop the non-motorized system to accommodate alternative Gthef forms of non-motorized transport, as well as medically necessary motorized transport. , Appropriate street furniture, lighting, signage, and landscaping should be installed along non-motorized routes to increase safety and to ensure that facilities are inviting to users. TR-95: AubUFn shall Clearly sign and mark major non-motorized routes to guide travelers and improve safety. TR-97: Aeb?fn shall Locate and design non-motorized transportation systems so that they contribute to the safety, efficiency, enjoyment and convenience of residential neighborhoods. TR-99: AabUFn shall Minimize hazards and obstructions on the non-motorized transportation system by properly designing, constructing, managing, and maintaining designated routes in the system. TR-100: Agin shall Promote pedestrian travel within the city and connections to adjacent communities with emphasis placed on safety and on connectivity to priority destinations such as schools, parks, the downtown, and other pedestrian-oriented areas. Pedestrian-oriented areas are those areas with high pedestrian traffic or potential and are identified in this plan. These areas and streets shall encourage pedestrian travel by providing enhanced pedestrian improvements or controls on motorized traffic. TR-101: AubuFn Continue to construct new and rehabilitate existing sidewalks through a sidewalk improvement program. TR-102: Armin shall Seek ways to provide pedestrian amenities such as streetlights, trees, seating areas, signage, and public art along all major pedestrian travel routes. TR-103: The Gity shall Work towards buffering pedestrian walkways from moving traffic, particularly in areas with high levels of pedestrian movements, such as near schools and commercial areas, and along corridors with heavy vehicular traffic. TR-104: The Gity shall Encourage the formation of LIDs to develop pedestrian pathways and other non- motorized amenities throughout the City. The City shall also partner with the local school districts to improve Safe Walking Routes to School. TR-105: Auburn mall Develop programs and publications, and work with local employers to encourage citywide bicycle commuting. TR-106: AubuFn should GORtiRue to Designate and maintain routes that create an interconnected system of bike lanes for local and regional travel, including on-street bike routes, and multi-purpose trails. Future bicycle routes are identified in Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. TR-107: The Gity shall Encourage the inclusion of convenient and secure bicycle storage facilities in all large public and private developments. TR-108: Auburn shall Strive to incorporate equestrian facilities into the design of trail and transportation facilities, where possible and appropriate. These efforts should be concentrated south of the White River, in Auburn's southeast corner, but considered for other areas of the City. TR-110: The Gity shall Create an interconnected system of safe equestrian trails and provide adequate equestrian amenities adjacent to those trails. TR-111: The Gity shall Gontinue to Partner with Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit to achieve Auburn's transit objectives. TR-112: The City shall Work with local and regional transit agencies to serve new and existing trip generators in Auburn, such as colleges, commercial areas, and community facilities. TR-113: The Gity shat ld Encourage Sound Transit and Metro Transit to explore linkages to the south with Pierce Transit, and to improve service between south Auburn and the Auburn Transit Center. TR-114: The City shall Consider both the transit impacts and the opportunities presented by major development proposals when reviewing development under the State Environmental Policy Act. TR-115: The City shall Encourage the inclusion of transit facilities in new development when appropriate. TR-116: Auburn shall Work with transit providers and regional agencies to develop a transit system that is fully accessible to pedestrians and the physically challenged, and which integrates the access, safety, and parking requirements of bicyclists. TR-117: The City will endeaveF to Identify areas of concentrated transit traffic and impose design and construction standards that accommodate the unique considerations associated with bus travel, such as street geometry and pedestrian linkages. TR-118: The City shall Continue to develop the Auburn Municipal Airport in accordance with the Airport Master Plan. TR-122: The Gity shall seek to Minimize or eliminate the potentially adverse effects of light and glare on the operation of the Auburn Municipal Airport. 9 0 rI L F- -I LJ fl a I I,o I, J 13 I 0 I-JI 3 ..X l l i r (.I A -? b k l ,' 14 0000 31 !?\\ ?:' (? " n °. e CAKE IMIh YIf(Y.1-Y111Y I4?l fryM nM1.m.XI11Jrlt rinMwrl ,b'MF?In!!UO"?/n'1??1:1'B V?' I?mlWt?f YFM lit l'O:(on(4N'IYI:N:Y:t LEGEND N AYWrnUyLimn Aub.2W6C-MS A DAILYTRAFFICVOLUMES * .:`l (T my avera0el ?8 Potan0al Annexellon Auburn 2005 Courts Arses 10 9(O (1 cay avaragel OaINTraffc Volumes .i,pgp Pace County 20064005 Figure 2-2 Counts (T eay average) ?/A 45 0 ).4 1 'CCV,IISiM fW I'OW OJPS IIOiTYnY11aNO. • • • I i, I?- I ? w. f x E + i 8 a i v O -'tTI 1 0 1- I _ .i I T r . - - ,c? 0 - N y S ' S 5 FC 6Y 0.b PA9E 0..i X F ` e 1n d n ' b 'A E l ' 'a ? ' -;d, ___ A af P N. a a avnmaMecalent un. n.WrNa .ra:t l v(4II4A?m Kel lh,umngrygptm . 4 A i 0 rot•y t N LE GEND A A WmiCdvumlt6 .-- Pinnci"IAftemis PROGRESS SINCE LAST ?kuBFfiF1 PWend6lAnneu io n 6 CompletedProiem TRANSPORTATION PLAN ` Aim Figure 1-2 Refer to Table t-1 for the list of improvem ents made since the last Iransporta0on plan. U S Fff x f Y ?YN C\ rc • • ', t ? ??II q4 l? L ?--ASEE DdTAPFWtEDW :uIC1y?oINS??alra'h ttvane] WNbnMLs LEGEND Speed Limit N 4?- "NPh Padrm CryYLITIS IS 'PH P?sGn Onnnwhnn "NP11 acu 35 NPH aO NPN mar a5 NPl1 S3 NPN L A SPEED LIMITS At 3 Figure 23 WM-F • • 0 • • u 21 1 1 ? t-rr 1I v _ ?I O ._ ,. J .. 171 P 1 4 I 1. I'- ij w c a .I 1 -mow*n H!ceN=_c eK+<,cry?d.:,.:u ?iro'ISrcw-.m. LU wr.Moo un.in:?eha+:vapi. mimfum?.tium,arcr. o:xmro s?nr 0.3 LEGEND IN 1 u,y m„ ,, , ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES An0 LTI Al .,e a Figure 2-7 f Pdn[IPYAMM1MS ? AIMrv/i,•a - N4vlCtlleclol Ami1W 2y Ni tol L?PJJW VN Ftww0 TN MD ? o as , " n u r' a'FPY'1?n \D) ? ? lY?b?lml F 4 i y? r rr i = t t ! seas onuvaarn?o er: cr/cniawwna?w??. A..?ve w,wnr LEGEND AI rn City Limits t Sd1oo le Polenasl Annoulton . Parks A ea • 6dsllni klolo Use Trait O Trip Ganeulor Proposm Tres 6detlnp Bike Lanes - - Proposes Bike Lanes ImNK= =? ••-•° Ptopoeeo Bie pmw 0 03 FUTURE TRAIL AND Ai3$F31EN BICYCLE NETWORK Figure 3-3 i ' Refer to Table 34 for descriptions of proposed trails. L , J • • 1 ® i fl ® ? ? t. ? 14dw PBP .r J 'a scx l s. O . ® j d m,; at s ? t _ . s }A??8 o ?? } ?Iws•r.:.n A l??e i e , ? ) . , eu 1 n«e..ru auw rwa ' 1 1 +1 I n t ? o- I rw. ?-uj r 1 006dNT049N AREA f _ F n?-.. _ _ ff -I S - at•S6 J?1le PRTilaBaeN B;OIr >?•nBVm,el rYMt'mM.N. Ravmrt!mlet'ImlvnM1ei 4lp.»nn?,Mxw d mmEkmlllly.emclnpnll'a lmPnl. ?, . L EGEND 13 R0 L 10S A EXISTING TRANSIT -N 0 A.t.rn City Units A M 6 AL?9 R SERVING AUBURN PotentialAnneasllan --- LomlBuSRolle mU Area No slops Figure 41 PnikanlRCO LrR ® Loral Bus Routs Number y--1• Co nu u Rail Regional Bus RoOft 1°u• e u+ ? Regional Bus Route Numloar n u • • l >r wn a i ? r. l l c. _ 111 - i?? d I I Y L] - i?v 'hNa 'NSilw Z P. Jose. daus:.- r r J i 1 r -- --808E WAPRT•L•EJBY'. In`Ch/cIN.-vm. xlr p'Y »a?nwl Nnvannl4r I .) ',n,.nJWnp^(D•^IN'. a1MMNMl.U'MRa11^Y..nV%'ha GN]+[1 LEGEND N Irc lR.r., Routes ^ TRANSIT DEPENDENT ALJ Bb-p N Auburn Ory0mts AREAS ArmorialMnaza6on Local Bas Roble with Area No Ro St Slops Figure 4-2 ?Tq,... Ps"nl-Rile Lol Re9iorA Bus Routes - Commuter Rail Traosl Dopenlenl 0 ?r.IMe Populallon 4 0.G 1 NOTE: Only sections of this Chapter proposed for amendment are included. CHAPTER 3 LAND USE Introduction Land use planning enables the City of Auburn to manage its anticipated growth and development while taking into consideration the specific community vision and desires. By designating how land can be used, those considerations necessary for orderly growth including the creation of jobs, the provision of recreational opportunities, strong and stable neighborhoods and an efficient transportation system can be pursued. • Auburn Today To better understand and evaluate the context for the City's future growth, it is helpful to evaluate the City's existing land use and zoning. Figure 3.1 provides an overview of the zoned acreage within the City of Auburn and the percentage that acreage represents of the City's overall land area. Land zoned for residential purposes, especially single family residential, is clearly predominant and represents about 40 percent (RR, RS, R1 and R2 zones) of the City's zoned acreage. Of commercial and industrial zoned land, the M1 (Light Industrial) zone is most predominant, consisting of almost 15 percent of the zoned acreage in the city. Land zoned P 1 (Public) is another significant land use zone consisting of almost ten percent of the city's zoned acreage. • Page 3-1 8, 1S. of. Chapter 3 Figure 3.1 is City of Auburn Acreage of Land by Zoning District PERCENTAGE ZONE ACREAGE OF CITY RR (Rural Residential) 1,493 10.23% RS (Single Family Residential) 318 2.18% R1 (Single Family Residential) 1,910 13.09% R2 (Single Family Residential) 2,04436 14.09% R3 (Two Family Residential) 274 1.88% R4 (Multiple Family Residential) 568 3.89% RMHP (Residential Mobile Home Park) 389 2.67% RO (Residential Office) 95.5 0.65% RO-H (Residential Office Hospital) 15.5 0.11% CN (Neighborhood Commercial) 12 0.08% CI (Light Commercial) 217 1.49% C2 (Gentral Business District) 107 0.73% C3 (Heavy Commercial) 878 6.02% BP (Business Park) 19 0.13% EP (Environmental Park) 272 TBD M1 (Light Industrial) M2 (Heavy Industrial) 1,8052;963 1,243 14.15% 8.52% • LF (Landing Field) 112 0.77% P1 (Public) 1,339 9.17% I (Institutional) 427.5 2.93% U (Unclassified) 432 2.96% PUD (Planned Unit Development) 647 4.43% TV (Terrace View) 58 0.40% TOTAL 14,675.50 100% Source: City of Auburn. Geographic Information Services (GIS) The above data do not include areas outside of the city limits but within the city's Potential Annexation Area (PAA). In general, the comprehensive plan designations established by the city in the PAA show that a significant amount of the City's PAA in both King and Pierce counties would be zoned for single-family residential purposes upon annexation to the city. BUILDABLE LANDS - LAND SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY In 1997 the Washington State legislature adopted a Buildable Lands • amendment to the Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A.215). Page 3-2 Chapter 3 • The Auburn Downtown Plan envisions Auburn's downtown as an urban center. Designation as an urban center was achieved in 2004. Auburn's urban center: • Establishes a 220 acre planning area that is the focus for downtown redevelopment. • Provides incentives for downtown development and redevelopment through policy direction that supports: -Removal of building height requirements in that portion of the urban center then zoned C-2 Central Business District (the C2 area has been rezoned to C2 Downtown Urban Center ; -Elimination of transportation impact fees for a five year period; -Elimination of stormwater improvements for redevelopment of existing sites that do not result in an increase in impervious surface; -Lower level of service for transportation facilities; and, -Reduction in the off-street parking requirements in the C-2 zone compared to other zones in the city, with even greater reductions for area in immediate proximity of the transit • center. • Encourages non-motorized pedestrian and bicycle connections and linkages to and within the urban center area. • Encourages protection of historic assets and resources from redevelopment activities. • Identifies potential catalyst projects and sites to spur development activity in the downtown and better focus redevelopment and marketing efforts. • Encourages more residential development downtown and also 24 hour type uses and nighttime activity. • Seeks to remove undesirable land uses and other blighting influences in the downtown area. • Promotes street improvements and enhancements to improve access and the visual qualities of the streetscape. Zoning for much of the urban center is predominantly, although not exclusively C-2 Downtown Urban Center Centf l Business D triet The C-2 zone encourages street level pedestrian commercial development and multi-family development overhead (mixed use). Many of the principles of the C-2 zone promote transit oriented development as well. There are approximately 846 dwelling units and 3,218 employees within the urban • center. Page 3-30 Chapter 3 LU-106 Individual development projects shall provide the following • minimal improvements in accordance with established City standards: a. Full standard streets and sidewalks in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. b. Adequate off street parking for employees and patrons. c. Landscaping. d. Storm drainage. e. Water. f. Sanitary sewers. g. Controlled and developed access to existing and proposed streets. Objective 11.4. To reserve areas appropriate for industrial development. Policies: LU-107 Any significant industrial activity shall be limited to the designated Region Serving Area of the city (see Map 3.2). The City recognizes that industrial development's place varying demands on the community's quality of life and service capabilities. In addition to demonstrating a developments' consistency with Plan policies, applicable land use regulations, and environmental policies, significant industrial development shall be encouraged to provide a balance between service demands and impacts placed on the city's quality of life vs. the local benefits derived from such development. The extent to which industrial development is promoted shall also take into consideration tax policy and tax structure impacts upon the city. • LU-108 intmsions of -r-Residential uses inte industrial areas shall-net be allowed in industrial areas that have been established to promote a business park environment that complements environmental features and/or if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between residential and Page 3-38 I Land Use other non-residential land uses. an ;.,+,.,,siens by eafam uses should be eentr-alled. • LU-109 The grouping of uses which will mutually benefit each other or provide needed services will be encouraged. a. Compatible commercial uses may be permitted in designated industrial areas., pa ieulafly these that ^ fil sefve industrial businesses or their- employees. b. Planned developments (such as "office parks") which provide a mixture of light industrial with supporting commercial uses are encouraged. c. Uses which support industrial and warehouse activities should be located near those uses. LU-110 Development of designated industrial sites shall be consistent with applicable environmental standards and policies. LU-110A Land made available for industrial development, and uses allowed in industrial zones, shall take into consideration • impacts of tax policy and tax structure upon the City of Auburn. Objective 11.4. To reserve and protect areas which are highly suitable for light industrial development. Policies: LU-111 Designation of light industrial areas shall have priority over heavier industrial uses. LU-112 Highly visible areas (land visible from SR167 or SR18) which tend to establish the image of the city should not be used by heavy industrial uses. Rather, efforts should be made to develop zonina districts that complement industrial development adjacent to environmental features such as the Auburn Environmental Park. Objective 11.5. To identify areas appropriate for heavy industrial uses. Policies: • Page 3-39 Chapter 3 Redevelopment and Infill LU-113 Heavy industrial uses shall be separated from lighter industrial, commercial and residential areas. LU-114 The most appropriate areas for heavy industrial uses are in the central part of the Region Serving Area adjoining the rail lines. LU-115 Heavy industrial uses are appropriate in the southern portion of the Region Serving Area which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities. LU-116 Heavy industrial uses shall be strictly prohibited from the Community Serving Area of Auburn (see Map 3.2). The en! exeeption to this general pehey shall be the eenfinued heavy industrial use of the afe- the Gempr-eehen a PlanAlap, A major goal of the Growth Management Act is to reduce urban sprawl. One way to minimize sprawl is to fully develop areas already receiving urban services prior to extending these services to additional areas. A further benefit of redevelopment is that it may lead to the removal of buildings and uses that detract from an area. Redevelopment can serve as a major catalyst in the stabilization and revitalization of areas throughout the city. • • Page 3-40 Chapter 3 LU-113 Heavy industrial uses shall be separated from lighter industrial, commercial and residential areas. LU-114 The most appropriate areas for heavy industrial uses are in the central part of the Region Serving Area adjoining the rail lines. LU-115 Heavy industrial uses are appropriate in the southern portion of the Region Serving Area which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities. LU-116 Heavy industrial uses shall be strictly prohibited from the Community Serving Area of Auburn (see Map 3.2). The only exception to this general policy shall be the continued heavy industrial use of the area east of "A" Street S.E., as shown by the Comprehensive Plan Map. Redevelopment and Infill A major goal of the Growth Management Act is to reduce urban sprawl. One way to minimize sprawl is to fully develop areas already receiving urban services prior to extending these services to additional areas. A further benefit of redevelopment is that it may lead to the removal of buildings and uses that detract from an area. Redevelopment can serve as a major catalyst in the stabilization and revitalization of areas throughout the city. Page 3-40 11 1°1 ?1c? • NOTE: Only sections of this Chapter proposed for amendment are included. CHAPTER 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES Introduction This chapter provides an overall policy direction for the different capital facility plans and programs provided by the City. Capital facilities belonging to privately owned utilities (electricity, natural gas lines, etc.) are covered in the Private Utilities chapter (Chapter 6). Certain City plans and programs are further refined in other sections of this plan such as parks or transportation. Overall, however, this chapter acts as a reference to all of the various capital facility plans, including the City of Auburn Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (which is a key component of, and is adopted with, this plan), comprehensive plans, capital improvement and is investment programs, inventories, and studies that together represent the planning and financing mechanisms required to serve the capital facility needs of Auburn. For more detail on a particular Capital Facility or the City's overall Capital Facility Plan, see the most recent adopted version of the following: City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Drainage Plan City of Auburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Issues and Background Growth The provision and sizing of public facilities such as streets or water and sewer lines can influence the rate or timing of development and is an . important means of managing growth. Timed provision of facilities also Page 5-1 Capital Facilities growth of the City as well as on the quality of life for residents of Auburn • and the surrounding areas. GOAL 13. CITY UTILITIES To protect the public health and safety by providing efficient and cost- effective water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and solid waste services to the community. Ensure that development will only occur if the urban services necessary to support the development will be available at the time of development. Water Service The City provides water service to a total of 11,506 customers accounts, approximately 9,624 within the City and 1,882 outside the current City limits. The City's sources of water include the Coal Creek watershed, West Hills Springs watershed and is supplemented by a system of ten nice wells. Storage facilities are found on the Enumclaw plateau, Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill. For more background information see the Capital Facilities Plan or Comprehensive Water Plan. Objective 13.1 To ensure safe and adequate water service, for both domestic and fire protection purposes, to meet the needs of the existing community and • provide for its planned growth. Policies: CF-13 The City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan is incorporated as an element of this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Water Plan for the City of Auburn shall reflect the planned land uses and densities of this Comprehensive Plan. CF-14 The Comprehensive Water Plan shall provide for the evaluation of existing and potential future groundwater sources regarding any threats to the quantity and quality of such sources. The Plan shall ensure that strategies for the protection of ground water sources used or likely to be used for public water supplies are established. CF-15 Protection of the City's Coal Creek Springs, and West Hill watersheds, wells, and other sources shall be a high priority in the designation of appropriate land uses in the vicinity of these areas and facilities. is Page 5-5 Chapter 5 • CF-16 The City shall continue its policy of requiring that water system extensions needed to serve new development shall be built prior to or simultaneous with such development, according to the size and configuration identified by the Comprehensive Water Plan as necessary to serve future planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full consideration to the ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City shall continue to participate to the extent permitted by law, through direct participation, LIDS and payback agreements to assist in the financing of such over sized improvements. Wherever any form of City finance is involved in a water line extension, lines that promote a compact development pattern will be favored over lines traversing large undeveloped areas where future development plans are uncertain. CF-17 Whenever a street is to be substantially reconstructed or a new street built, the City lee shall determine whether water facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed or brought up to the size and configuration indicated by the Water Plan and Comprehensive Plan. CF-18 The City shall continue to recognize the overall system impacts • of new development upon. the City water system through the collection and appropriate use of system development charges or similar fees. CF-19 The City shall consider the impacts of new development within aquifer recharge areas of potable water sources as part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigation measures. Such mitigation may involve hydrogeologic studies, testing, and/or monitoring (including monitoring wells), spill response planning, spill containment devices, sanitary sewers, and use of best management practices. CF-20 The City shall promote water conservation and the wise use of water resources. CF-21 The City should work with other water providers to promote effective water supply management and planning consistent with the "South King County Coordinated Water System Plan", as well as regional water supply and conservation goals. Page 5-6 Capital Facilities CF-64 Public facilities of an industrial or heavy commercial character • should be confined to the Region Serving Area of Auburn, unless no other reasonable siting opportunity exists in which case siting still must comply with applicable zoning standards. Examples of such facilities are the City maintenance and operations facility, state and regional solid waste facilities, and the Auburn School District bus barn. CF-64A The siting and relocation of City maintenance and operation facilities shall be responsive to rig demands for utility, transportation and fleet services and shall also take into account the City's role in emergency preparedness and response. Essential Public Facilities According to the GMA (RCW 36.70A.200), as amended, "Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site such as airports, state education facilities, state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020." More • generally, essential public facilities are facilities, conveyances, or sites that meet the following definition: (1) the facility, conveyance or site is used to provide services to the public; (2) these services are delivered by government agencies, private or non-profit organizations under contract to or with substantial funding from government agencies, or private firms or organizations subject to public service obligations, and (3) the facility or use of the site is necessary to adequately provide a public service. The Growth Management Act requires that every comprehensive plan include a process for siting essential public facilities. No comprehensive plan can preclude the siting of essential public facilities within the community. The Growth Management Act includes these provisions because siting certain public facilities has become difficult due to the impacts many of these facilities have on the adjacent community. Many factors contribute to this problem, including increased demand for facilities to serve a growing population, increased competition for land as the state becomes more urbanized, problems with siting processes, and judicial decisions which compel jurisdictions to provide certain facilities. By including a process for siting essential facilities in the Comprehensive Plan, deficiencies in the siting process can be minimized. This section contains Auburn's process for siting essential public facilities. • This is an interim process as the Growth Management Planning Council, Page 5-15 0 NOTE: Only sections of this Chapter proposed for amendment are included. CHAPTER 14 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP Introduction The previous chapters presented the goals, objectives and policies intended to guide Auburn's future physical development. The Comprehensive Plan Map presented in this chapter (Map 14.1) applies those policies to the various areas of the City, by indicating the appropriate locations for various categories of land use. The Plan Map should be consulted together with the written policies of this Plan when decisions about land use and public facility development are considered. This chapter also explains the reasoning and intention behind the Plan Map's land use designations. This should be useful in developing and applying implementing tools (such as zoning provisions); for interpreting the Plan Map as it applies to specific regulatory decisions or development proposals; and in adjusting or amending the Plan Map when changing conditions or land use markets warrant. Finally, this chapter sets forth some special policies intended to deal with the unique problems or opportunities that exist in certain specific locations within Auburn. These specific policies supplement the general goals, objectives and policies of earlier chapters. Land Use Designations: Plan Map Residential Categories Rural • Page 14-1 Comp. Plan maintain the area's pedestrian environment. Parking standards within the downtown should reflect the pedestrian orientation of the area, but also consider parking's impact for economic development. Criteria for Designation: This designation should apply only in Downtown Auburn. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation should not be used other than for the Downtown area. Appropriate Implementation: This designation can be implemented by five possible zoning districts, depending upon the specific character of that portion of the downtown: 1) The Main Street retail core should be implemented by the C-2 Downtown Urban CenterCepAf l B'•"District. 2) The area around Auburn Regional Medical Center should be designated with the RO-H (Residential Office-Hospital) District. 3) For some portions the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) district may be appropriate. 4) For primarily residential areas, the R-4 (Multiple Family Residential) district may be appropriate. 5) For some portions the C-1 (Light Commercial) district may be appropriate. Heavy Commercial Purpose: To provide automobile oriented commercial areas to meet both the local and regional need for such services. Description: This category is intended to accommodate uses which are oriented to automobiles either as the mode or target of providing the commercial service. The category would also accommodate a wide range of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or heavy vehicular movement. Compatible Uses: A wide variety of commercial services oriented to automobiles are appropriate within this category. This includes automobile sales and service, drive in restaurant or other drive in commercial business, convenience stores, etc. Since these uses are also compatible with heavier commercial uses, lumber yards, small scale warehousing, contractor yards and similar heavy commercial uses are appropriate in this designation. • Page 14-11 Chapter 14 1) RO - Residential Office District which is intended to primarily accommodate business and professional offices where they are compatible with residential uses. 2) RO-H Residential Office-Hospital District is to be used exclusively for the area around Auburn Regional Medical Center. Industrial Categories Light Industrial Purpose: To reserve quality industrial lands for activities that implement the City's economic development policy. Description: This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of industrial and commercial uses. It is distinguished from heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant activities shall take place inside buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictly controlled and permitted only as an incidental part of another use. The siting and design of industrial buildings shall be of an "industrial or business park" character. Certain residential uses may be permitted, especially in industrial areas that have been established to promote a business park environment that complements environmental features, and/or if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses. Compatible Uses: A wide range of industrial and heavy commercial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. These uses include warehousing and indoor processing of materials. Certain residential uses may be permitted if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses Outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with adjacent uses and so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be extensively screened. In the Environmental Park District that implements the "Light Industrial" plan ma designation, outdoor storage will be strictly limited to promote compatibility with adjacent environmental land uses. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials as well as substantial emissions should not be permitted in these areas. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed provided that such uses support rather than detract from the industrial character of the area. Page 14-14 Comp. Plan Man The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Auburn Yard located within 0 the Railroad Special Plan Area is considered a compatible use at its current level of usage (as of August 14, 1996). It is not bound by the policies concerning outside storage under the existing light industrial designation as it was an existing use prior to the development of this policy. Should BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to upgrade the yard to an intermodal facility, the proposal will be subject to the essential public facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 5). Criteria for Designation: This designation should be applied to a majority of the Region Serving Area designated under this Plan. It is particularly appropriate for industrial land within high visibility corridors. This category should separate heavy industrial areas from other uses. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Within the Community Serving Area, this designation should only be applied to sites now developed as light industrial sites. Industrial sites along rail corridors are generally more appropriate for heavier industrial uses, unless in high visibility corridors. Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the M-1, Environmental Park (EP) or Business Park (BP) zone. Heavy Industrial Purpose: To provide a place for needed heavy industrial uses in areas appropriately sited for such uses. Description: This designation allows the full range of industrial uses as well as certain commercial uses. Certain residential uses maw permitted if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses Compatible Uses: While this zone should be reserved primarily for the heavier forms of industrial activities, a wide range of industrial and commercial activities may be permitted, along with residential uses with appropriate compatibility protections. Criteria for Designation: The most appropriate area for this designation is in the central part of the Region Serving Area adjoining the rail lines. This designation is also appropriate in the southern portion of the area Page 14-15 Chapter 14 which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities (the Boeing and the General Services Administration facilities). Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation can only be applied in the Community Serving Area to sites now developed in this character along A Street S.E. These areas should not abut commercial or residential areas; heavy industry should be buffered by light industrial uses. It is not an appropriate designation for highly visible areas. Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the M-2 zone. Planned Areas Special Plan Areas (See Map 14.2) Purpose: To allow large areas within the City, under a single or a coordinated management, to be developed as a planned unit. This designation can also be used to provide flexibility when there is uncertainty regarding how an area may be most appropriately developed in the future. Description: This designation applies to specific areas identified as being appropriate for mixed, urban level development on a planned basis. It is intended that the future development of these areas will be guided by individual "elements" of the Comprehensive Plan, to be developed and adopted at a later date. The Plan elements should be consistent with the following. Compatible Uses: Uses and intensities within Special Planning Areas shall be determined for each area through individual planning processes. Each individual planning process will result in the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan element for that particular Special Planning Area. Each Plan element shall be consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Development of the individual Plan elements shall also be based upon the following guidelines: Academy Special Planning Area; The Auburn Adventist Academy Plan was adopted by resolution No. 2254 in November 1991. The Plan applies to the area within the property owned by the Academy and allows for a diversity of uses on the site, primarily those related to the mission and objectives of the Academy. As part of the adoption of the Plan, the area was zoned under the I-Institutional Use District which permits uses such Page 14-16 1I?V-0? I Chapter 14 which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities (the Boeing and 40 the General Services Administration facilities). Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation should not bee ly be applied in the Community Serving Area. to sites now deTTI'9p'ea.ZTfthis \'ZILCI'CTET St-Feet T'i7 S.E. These areas should o+vc-abut eemmer ial-or residential areas; heavy industi=y should be buffer-°d by light i dustf a uses It is not an appropriate designation for highly visible areas. N H ?t PIn w;?k Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the M-2 zone. Planned Areas Special Plan Areas (See Map 14.2) Purpose: To allow large areas within the City, under a single or a coordinated management, to be developed as a planned unit. This designation can also be used to provide flexibility when there is uncertainty regarding how an area may be most appropriately developed in the future. Description: This designation applies to specific areas identified as being appropriate for mixed, urban level development on a planned basis. It is intended that the future development of these areas will be guided by individual "elements" of the Comprehensive Plan, to be developed and adopted at a later date. The Plan elements should be consistent with the following. Compatible Uses: Uses and intensities within Special Planning Areas shall be determined for each area through individual planning processes. Each individual planning process will result in the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan element for that particular Special Planning Area. Each Plan element shall be consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Development of the individual - Plan elements shall also be based upon the following guidelines: Academy Special Planning Area: The Auburn Adventist Academy Plan was adopted by resolution No. 2254 in November 1991. The Plan applies to the area within the property owned by the Academy and allows for a diversity of uses on the site, primarily those related to the mission and • objectives of the Academy. As part of the adoption of the Plan, the area was zoned under the I-Institutional Use District which permits uses such Page 14-16 Chapter 14 development proposals shall be carefully assessed under SEPA to ensure that the development can be supported by the available facilities. Once property owners are able to demonstrate to the City that they can provide urban services (municipal water and sewer service, urban roads and storm water management) necessary to support the intensity of development proposed within the entire area, the Plan designation and zoning for this area should be changed to an urban residential or commercial classification. The appropriate classification(s) shall be determined after a review of the development proposal and the pertinent Comprehensive Plan policies. Transition Areas 15th Street Commercial Area Area: Area served by 15th Street N.E. and N.W. between D Street N.E. and B Street N.W. Problem: The Plan Map designates the area immediately served by 15th Street as commercial. Most of the rest of the area retains the industrial designation of the previous Plan. Actual development of this area will depend on market trends, and commercial use is as appropriate as light industrial. Expansion of the area designated as heavy industrial would conflict with the westward expansion of the commercial area from Auburn Way. Policy III.D. Additional appropriate commercial zoning in this area would not be in conflict with this Plan. Further heavy industrial zoning beyond the area now designated would conflict with this Plan. Area North of West Main Aubum High Seheel md area aefth ef 3r-d Stfeet NW between high seheel and the Burlington - I-\ Policy III.E. Deleted. Admin?stfation af the zoning er-dina this are aware that Pitt-pr6pc-F planned -to-be-in ust4-Al. --Austfial Page 14-24 Comp. Plan development i this o 411 n mot be required to buffer- . .,.t, side ees The area between Main Street and this area shall be zoned fef- r-esidenfial development- to - pfGsei'b,e the--eyisting -rwra criial -ehar-aetef of this thberti ee East Main Street Area: East Main Street between Auburn Way and M Street. Problem: A full range of commercial uses will seek to locate in this area. Such uses could adversely affect adjacent residential amenities. Heavy commercial strip zoning would be particularly detrimental, not only to adjacent areas but also to the capacity of Main Street. Existing commercial uses have nonetheless been accommodated. Policy III.F. Land use decisions shall seek to minimize any adverse impact on adjacent residential uses. Existing commercial uses should be allowed to continue as permitted uses. New development should be -consistent with the office/residential use designation. M Street Residential Area: Area along "M" Street S.E., south of East Main and north of Highway 18. Problem: This is a high quality viable residential area. Pressure will continue for conversion to commercial uses. Once some conversion occurs, the area will no longer be viable as a residential area. Policy III.G. The City will resist conversion in this area from single family. Golden Triangle Area: Bordered on the north by Highway 18, on the south and west by Auburn Way South, and on the east by Dogwood Street. Problem: Auburn Way South provides a thoroughfare for thousands of commuters each day. The "pass through" traffic represents thousands of potential customers for the businesses in this area. The challenge is to create an area that encourages potential consumers to take the time to patronize the businesses in this area, either through stopping during their commute or returning during leisure time hours. Policy III. G.I. Support opportunities for the development of commercial clusters at 12th Street SE and Auburn Way South, Auburn Way South to M • Street SE south of 12 Street SE, and on the east side of 12th and M Street SE. Capitalize on possible relocations of existing uses to develop Page 14-25 Chapter 14 coordinated commercial cluster opportunities and on the development of Les Gove Park to support adjacent commercial and high end residential development. A Street SE Area: A Street SE corridor, extending from Highway 18 to the north to the city limits to the south, the BNSF rail lines/rail yard to the west and D Street SE (extended to the south) to the east. Problem: A Street SE provides for a significant level of traffic that offers the potential to attract customers to support existing and future business along this corridor. Challenges include better definition of the transition between residential neighborhoods and future commercial development to provide predictability for both neighborhood residents and commercial uses, as well as how to address historical uses such as mobile home parks and industrial development along this corridor that occupy property that is better suited for other uses. Policy III. G.2. Define appropriate transition boundaries between commercial and residential development in a manner that protects residential uses while providing for economic development opportunities along the corridor. 0 Problems Related to Existing Uses West Auburn Area: South of West Main between the rail lines. Problem: This is an older part of town developed in a pattern of commercial uses along Main Street and residential uses south to Highway 18. This area is in the Region Serving Area as designated in this Plan. • The homes in this area are typically older singer family homes that have Page 14-26 Street SE, special development standards shall be adopted The special development standards could include requirements for increased building and parking setbacks and/or landscape buffer treatment The standards may also include the implementation of traffic claming measures as appropriate to reduce traffic imnnctc on the -1;n-Pint vav;r'--f-I Comp. Plan been converted to multi-family housing. Some may have historic significance. Preservation and restoration of the existing housing in this area is a priority. Policy III.H. This area should be planned for local serving multiple family uses even though it is in the Region Serving Area. Western and Clay Streets Area: Existing residential area north of West Main Street served by Western and Clay Streets. Problem: There is an established residential area in the middle of a designated industrial area. However, economic pressure, the desire to promote a "Green Zone" to complement the Auburn Environmental Park, combined with adjacent development patterns will ultimately convert this area to other uses. Policy 111.1. As long as this area remains viable as a residential area, City policy will try to protect that use in assessing the impact of industrial development of adjacent areas. Airport Area t Area: Industrially designated area east of the Airport. Problem: This area is highly suited for air related activities. Other industrial type uses are now located here. Policy III.J. The City will encourage use in this area to take advantage of its proximity to the Airport. 3'-a?ree-t Area, Northwest raerner of-stFeet ,.>,~ and 30th Street 1, crcc crrn-??v ?n PrBbleml This area ineiudes prepe Ay that is desi gnated gh i- Indus and is-lee ated *Atiin th e eemmunity se - erZ-the enTrt is the only "Light in dustrial" deni ed preel -in -the Aube -N tl q St t T?? id f b t 12'h 8 t r t ? ?X t A dh ffi it ef % r Th limits Th ee - ee e " e fa r e rf ef- rom a d b s e i ou ee , - - . " li l t i d t e flef _ . - e y l " .- fit b i i 1111111 . VpVl G ?/ y I eeup e , i y g n us e r a us ness. designation in the-ee trnit?, se pr-iate. Retention the "Light industrial" designation far-this-property is only cep stfffeunding heawy eemmefeial and high density residential land uses. Page 14-27 Legend ............ Density tial / Residential \ \\\\? Commercial U" Commefpa• I clal Heavy Commercial COMMEMEMOME PZAN %* Heavy Mustrial OE SIONATIONS STUDY AREA 11 a. Page 8 PIM 1AF ?01