HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocuments Submitted at the Meeting r
r Presented at the 11/16/09 Finance ~
Committee meeting
ORDINANCE NO. 6 2 7 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF
REGULAR PROPERTY TAXES BY THE CITY OF AUBURN FOR
COLLECTION IN 2010
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn has met and
considered its budget for the calendar year 2010; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 the City Council held public
hearing~ on October 5, 2009,.a , , after proper notice was
given, to consider the City of Auburn's 2010 budget and the regular property
tax levy to support it; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn, after public hearing,
and after duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, has
determined that the City of Auburn requires property tax revenue and any
increase of new construction and improvements to property, any increase in the
value of state-assessed property, annexations, and any refund levies in order
to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best
interest.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Regular property taxes for colle'e City of Auburn
~
for the year 2010 are authorized in the amount of 0.~including
the addition of new construction and improvements to property, any increase in
Ordinance No. 6274
November 16, 2009
Page 1 of 4
i
~
the value of state assessed property, and any refund levies available, the
regular property tax levy for 2010 collection represents an increase from
regular property taxes levied for collection in 2009 of One Million One Hundred
,
Twenty ,Nine Thousand Six Hundred Forty Four pollars ($1,129,64 which
constitut~s an eight point seven perce t(8.7%) increase in rev enue from the
~
previous year.
Section 2. A portion of this levy will be designated to the City's SOS
program as provided for in Ordinance 5864 which outlines use to be specifically
for the Street Improvements program that includes any improvements to the
locaf streets system consisting of preservation, restoration, and reconstruction
of existing pavements, street drainage system, sidewalks, pedestrian
walkways, and handicap access ramps, provision of street lights to meet the
city's standard, crosswalks, channelization, parking, traffic calming, congestion
improvements, and other improvements determined by the council to provide
meaningful and beneficial quality of life improvement to the local community
and any collector arterial that the Council determines on a case by case basis
services primarily "a residential character or community public school safe
walking route.
Section 3. In order to avoid unnecessary interFund loans caused by
uneven cash flow requirements for tax-supported funds, the Finance Director is
hereby authorized to allocate individual property tax receipts in a manner that
eliminates interfund loans.
Ordinance No. 6274
November 16, 2009
Page 2 of 4
r
7
Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of
the remaining portions of the Ordinance, as it being hereby expressly declared
that this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
hereof would have been prepared, proposed, adopted and approved and
ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out
the directives of this legislation.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6274
November 16, 2009
Page 3 of 4
i
i
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
.
Ordinance No. 6274
November 16, 2009
Page 4 of 4
' Presented at the 11/16/09 Finance
Ask MRSC Committee meeting
Summaries of recent inquiries answered by MRSC consultants -
Must a city or county provide work The city collected $1,000,000 in prop- dog for a nominal amount, such as $1.
e-mail addresses of its employees erty taxes in 2006 at a rate of $1.00 Among the reasons to support such a
if requested? per $1,000 assessed value, on a total policy is that the dog is older, knows
valuation of $1 billion. The city can and is loyal to the handler, was often
Yes, in our opinion, employee e-mail increase its 2007 levy by 1 percent to trained by the handler, and has little
addresses would have to be provided in $1,010,000 in 2007 (not counting commercial value.
response to a public disclosure re- any additional tax revenue from new
quest. RCW 42.56.250(3) specifically construction added to the tax rolls in Contact MRSC if you would like to se,
exempts from public disclosure the the past year). The total taxable value a few sample policies.
"personal electronic mail addresses" of properties in the district increased
of public employees, but it does not 15 percent from $1 billion to $1.15 What is the status of an initiatit
exempt their work e-mail addresses. billion (not counting new construction). petition that has been filed in a
Without an applicable exemption, these In order to keep from collecting more code city that has not adopted
e-mail addresses must be disclosed. than 1 percent additional tax on exist- the powers of initiative and
ing properties, the city must lower its
tax rate to $0.878261 from $1.00 referendum?
How do we explain to citizens why Per
property taxes on some properties $11000 assessed value. In our opinion, this would not be a
can increase by more than one In 2007, each of these three homes valid initiative petition, and the issue
percent if the total can only go up paid $200 in taxes on $200,000 of may not be submitted to the voters
by one percent? assessed value at the $1.00 rate. In in its present format at the November
2008, the tax depends on how their election.
The Washington State Department of assessed values change compared to
Revenue offers the following helpful other properties in the city. Citizens in code cities do not automati-
explanation on its website http://dor. cally have the powers of initiative and
wa.gov/content/findtaxesandrates/ • Home A -value increased by 10 referendum on local issues. While
propertytax: percent; taxes drop to $193.22 these powers are available to citizens
on $220,000 of assessed value at on statewide issues under the state
The 1 percent limit applies to the maxi- $0.878261 rate (3.39% de- constitution, there is no provision in the
mum increase in tax revenue levied by crease); constitution that grants voters a similar
an individual taxing district. It does not • Home B- value increased by 20 right to initiative and referendum pow-
apply to individual homes, which tend percent; taxes rise to $210.78 on ers on local matters.
to increase in assessed valuations at $240,000 of assessed value at
varying rates, depending on location $0.878261 rate. (5.39% in- In view of the fact that the state
and other factors. Taxes owindividual constitution does not provide for local
y crease); powers of initiative and referendum,
homes could increase b more or less • Home C- value increased by 15
than 1 percent, depending on how percent; taxes rise to $202.00 on the state legislature, when it adopted
they change in value relative to other the Optional Municipal Code, Title 35A
$230,000 of assessed value at
properties in a district. $0.878261 rate (1% increase). RCW, provided a mechanism by which
the powers of initiative and referendum
Example: What process needs to be followed may be adopted by each code city
to retire a police dog? What, if individually. This process is set out
• Home A increases from $200,000 in RCW 35A.11.080 - 35A.11.100.
to $220,000 in assessed value anything, needs to be done to give Most code cities in this state have not
within a city (a 10 percent in- custody of the dog to its officer adopted the powers of initiative and
crease); after its retirement? referendum. Of the state's 188 code
• Home B increases from $200,000 cities, only 50 have adopted the pow-
to $240,000 in assessed value (a It appears to be a common practice for ers of initiative and referendum.
20 percent increase); police departments to allow a transfer
• Home C increases from $200,000 of ownership of police dogs to their Code cities that have not followed the
to $230,000 in assessed value (a handlers once the dogs have been process to adopt these powers may
15 percent increase - fhe average retired. We suggest adopting a formal not utilize them. In view of this, the
increase in assessed valuations for policy allowing handlers to keep their petition submitted has no legal effect
all properties.) retiring dogs. Such policies typically and may not be processed as a formal
provide for handlers to purchase the initiative.
10 . Municipal Research News - Fall 2008
Presented at the 11/16/09 Finance
Committee meeting
.
AITY F tiBURN AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
WASHINGTON
Agenda Subject: Date:
Ordinance No. 6278 March 16, 2009
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Finance Ordinance No. 6278 and Schedule
<<A„
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6278
Background Summary:
Ordinance No. 6278 amends Ordinance No. 6246, which amends Ordinance No. 6226, which amends
the 2009-2010 Biennial Budget which was originally adopted on Ordinance No. 6215. This current
Ordinance No. 6278 is for additional appropriations in the various funds.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑ Building ❑ M&O
❑ Airport E Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor
❑ Hearing Examiner E Municipal Serv. M Finance ❑ Parks
❑ Human Services N Planning & CD ❑ Fire ❑ Planning
❑ Park Board E Public Works ❑ Legal ❑ Police
❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other ❑ Public Works ❑ Human Resources
❑ Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: ❑Yes ❑No
Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing
Referred to Until
Tabled Until
Councilmember: Backus Staff: Coleman
Meeting Date: March 16, 2009 Item Number:
AUBURN *MURE THAN YOU IMAGINED
ORDINANCE NO. 6 2 7 8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
6215, THE 2009-2010 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE AS
AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6226 AND ORDINANCE NO.
6246 AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF
AUBURN 2009-2010 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN
SCHEDULE "A"
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 1,
2008, adopted Ordinance No. 6215 which adopted the City of Auburn 2009-2010
Biennial budget; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of March 16,
2009 adopted Ordinance No. 6226 which amended Ordinance No. 6215 which
adopted the City of Auburn 2009-2010 Biennial budget; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of July 20, 2009
adopted Ordinance No. 6246 which amended Ordinance 6226; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional
funds to the various funds of the 2009 budget; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the
majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment of the 2009-2010 Biennial Budget. The 2009-
2010 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34
RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule "A" attached
Ordinance No. 6278
November 16, 2009
Page 1 of 3
hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn,
Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts
shown on said Schedule "A". A copy of said Schedule "A" is on file with the City
Clerk and available for public inspection.
Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the
remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other
person or circumstance shall not be affected.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directives of this legislation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided
by law.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Ordinance No. 6278
November 16, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Danielle E. Daskam
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid
City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
Ordinance No. 6278
November 16, 2009
Page 3 of 3
~
CITY OF AUBURN
° 2009 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Amendment # 3 Ordinance 6278
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUNT#/DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
GENERAL FUND 001:
REVENUE:
InterloCal Grants 26,100 180,000 1 206,100 King Conservation District Grant for Mill
Creek Restoration project CP0746
King County Dept of Public Health 5,600 2,800 2 8,400 Increase budget for KC grant for Youth
Violence Prevention Fairs & Cascade MS
Afterschool program
ARRA- JAG Byrne Grant - 90,000 3 90,000 ARRA-JAG Byrne Grant Award to fund 3
. programs 1) Communily Policing program 2)
Altemative to Incarceration program and 3)
(budget in fund 518) Video surveillance
system for new parking facility. Res 4526 on
9/09/09
Senior Center Programs 115,000 11,000 4 126,000 Increase Program Revenues
Contributions & Donations - 94,970 5 94,970 Police Department Contribution
CHANGE IN REVENUE 378,770 378,770
EXPENDITURES;
Human Resources
Professional Services 270,000 50,000 3 320,000 Grant funded- Mental health & substance
abuse program -Res 4526 on 9l09/09
Police
Salaries 676,400 1,090 5 677,490 Reverse BA#2 should have been budgeted
asrevenue
Salaries 5,532,440 66,600 5 5,599,040 Reverse BA #2 should have been budgeted
asrevenue
Overtime 553,900 40,000 3 593,900 Grant funded Police communiry policing
program - Res 4526 on 09/09/09
Salaries 1,556,480 16,010 5 1,572,490 Reverse BA #2 should have been budgeted
asrevenue
Salaries 419,140 2,960 5 422,100 Reverse BA#2 should have been budgeted
asrevenue
Salaries 629,390 3,610 5 633,000 Reverse BA#2 should have been budgeted
as revenue
Salaries 843,300 4,700 5 848,000 Reverse BA #2 should have been budgeted
asrevenue
Parks
Professional Services 44,600 2,500 47,100 increase budget for Vietnam Veterans
Memorial Wall
Interfund Facilities 194,900 (75,900) 6 119,000 Reduce Facilities Interfund services for
Theater Capital lease payment
Supplies 37,700 1,000 4 38,700 Increase Senior Services program expenses
Professional Services 52,600 7,000 4 59,600 Increase Senior Services program expenses
Miscellaneous Charges 21,300 3,000 4 24,300 Increase Senior Services program expenses
Other Wages 320,000 1,000 2 321,000 increase budgetfor Grantfunded Youth
Violence Prevention Fairs & Cascade MS
Afterschool program
Supplies 156,000 1,000 2 157,000 Increase budget for Grant funded Youth
Violence Prevention Fairs & Cascade MS
Afterschool program
Small Tools 4,700 800 2 5,500 Increase budget for Grant funded Youth
Violence Prevention Fairs & Cascade MS
Afterschool program Capital Lease Principal - 38,700 6 38,700 Theater Capital Lease Principal
Capital Lease Interest - 37,200 6 37,200 Theater Capital Lease Interest
Non Departmental
Construction projects 158,000 180,000 1 338,000 Mill Creek Restoration project CP0746
funded by King Conservation District Grant
CHANGE IN EXPENDITURES 381,270 381,270
Designated Ending Fund Balance 346,225 346,225 Adjust Ending Fund ealance
Undesignated Ending fund balance 8,116,776 (2,500) 8,114,276 Adjust Ending Fund ealance
378,770
F:\Budget Directory\2009 Budget\Budget Amendments\09 BA_3\Schedule A-BA# 3.XLS 11/16/20091:59 PM
f
♦ .
CITY OF AUBURN
• 2009 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Amendment # 3 Ordinance 6278
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUNT#/DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
FUND 102 ARTERIAI STREET
REVENUES
Indirect Federal Grant 2,692,000 (250,340) 2,441,660 Reduce Revenue per 2010-2015 Capital
Facilities Plan
Indirect Federal Grant - 396,700 7 396,700 HSIP Grant for F St SE /4th St SE project -
Res 4516 on 8/27/09
State Grant-Dept of Transportation - 124,300 8 124,300 WSDOT Grant for CP0803-37th St SE/ R St
SE Pedestrian Connector- Res 4515 on
8/27/09
Intergovernmental Services - 51,500 9 51,500 Interagency Agreement with KC for feasibiliry
study to relocate sewer line as part of M St
grade separation project-Res 4517 on
S/28l09
Contribution & Donations 500,000 (500,000) - Reduce Revenue per 2010-2015 Capital
Facilities Plan
Operating Transfer In 2,258,220 9,000 10 Transfer Traffic Impact Fee for Harvey Rd &
Sth ST NE (cp0611) PWTF loan debt service
144,000 11 Transferin REET2from Fund 328forITS
project
81,000 15 2,492,220 Transfer In from I/S fund 518 for ITS project
56,160
EXPENDITURES
Capital Projects 7,496,720 396,700 7 F St SE! 4th St SE project #CP0914-Grant
funded per Res 4516 on 8/27/09
124,300 8 . WSDOT Grant for CP0803-37th St SE/ R St
SE Pedestrian Connector-CP0803-Grant
funded Res 4515 on 8/27/09
51,500 9 Interagency Agreement with KC for feasibility
study to relocate sewer line as part of M St
grade separation project-Res 4517 on
8/28/09
144,000 11 Increase ITS project -Transfer in from Fund
328
81,000 15 Increase ITS project -Transfer in from Fund
518
(1,255,586) 7,038,634 Reduce Capital projects per 2010-2015
Capital Facilities Plan
Ending Fund Balance 646,617 514,246 1,160,863 Adjust Endingfund balance
56,160
FUND 124 MITIGATION FEES FUND
REVENUES
Fire Impact Fees - 114,000 12 114,000 Budget for Fire Impact Fees Received
Traffic Mitigation 50,000 (50,000) - Reduce Traffic Mitigation
64,000
EXPENDITURES
Intergovernmental Services-Fire Impact 70,000 114,000 72 184,000 Fire Impact Fees for Lakeland Fire Station
Transfer Out-Impact Fees 2,003,500 9,000 10 2,012,500 Transfer out to Fund 102 for Harvey Rd &
8th St NE project (cp0611)
Designated Fund Balance 4,633,714 (59,000) 4,574,714 Adjust Ending Fund Balance
64,000
F:\Budget Directory\2009 Budget\Budget Amendments\09 BA_3\Schedule A-BA# 3.XLS 11/16/20091:59 PM
!
' CITY OF AUBURN
' 2009 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Amendment # 3 Ordinance 6278
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUNT#lDESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
FUND 328 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
REVENUES
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 900,000 (150,000) 750,000 Reduce REET 1 Revenue
Real Estate Excise Tax 2 900,000 (150,000) 750,000 Reduce REET 2 Revenue
Indirect Federal Grant 110,000 (100,000) 10,000 Reduce Revenue for City Hall Annex Project
per 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan
Contributions & Donations 2,181,200 (2,155,400) 25,800 Reduce Revenue for City Hall Annex Project
per 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan
(2, 555, 400)
EXPENDITURES
Transfer Out-REET2 102,920 144,000 11 246,920 Transfer Out REET2 to Fund 102 for ITS
project
Construction Projects 177,700 (144,000) 11 33,700 Reduce Traffic Signal Improvements project -
transfer to ITS project
Construction Projects 988,549 515,451 1,504,000 Adjust City Hall Annex Project per 2010-2015
Capital Facilities Plan (REET1 funding)
Construction Projects 6,149,110 (4,488,010) 1,661,100 Adjust City Hall Annex Project per 2010-2015
Capital Facilities Plan
Capital Project-REET2 - 250,000 250,000 Local Revitalization Project
Ending Fund Balance 2,133,658 1,167,159 3,300,817 Adjust Ending Fund Balance
(2, 555, 400)
FUND 430 WATER FUND
EXPENDITURES
Construction Projects 8,927,500 (5,007,500) 3,920,000 Decrease budget per 2010-2015 Capital
Facilities Plan
Ending Working Capital 1,853,487 5,007,500 6,860,987 Adjust Ending Working Capital
FUND 431 SEWER FUND
EXPENDITURES
Construction Projects 10,143,230 (5,443,230) 4,700,000 Decrease budget per 2010-2015 Capital
Facilities Plan
Ending Working Capital 6,612,743 5,443,230 12,055,973 Adjust Ending Working Capital
FUND 432 STORM DRAINAGE FUND
REVENUES
InterlocaiGr'ant - 1,019,200 13 KC Agreement-reimbursement for flood
protection services & supplies
1,019,200
EXPENDITURES
Salaries 650,980 180,000 830,980 Increase budget for flood protection salaries
(EM0902)
Benefits 230,470 70,200 300,670 Increase budget for flood protection benefils
(EM0902)
Operating Supplies 60,000 242,000 302,000 Increase budget for flood protection supplies
(EM0902)
Small Tools & Minor Equipment 58,500 104,000 162,500 Increase budget forflood protection minor
equipment (EM0902)
Construction Projects 6,672,730 (2,672,730) Decrease budget per 2010-2015 Capital
Facilities Plan
1,058,500 13 5,058,500 Increase budget for flood protection project
(EM0902)-($1,019,200) funded by King
County
Ending Working Capital 1,454,599 2,037,230 3,491,829 Adjust Ending Working Capital
1,019,200
F:\Budget Directory\2009 Budget\Budget Amendments\09 BA_3\Schedule A-BA# 3.XLS 11 /16/20091:59 PM
CITY OF AUBURN
' 2009 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Amendment # 3 Ordinance 6278
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUNT#/DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
FUND 437 GOLF COURSE FUND
REVENUES
Indirect Federal Grants - 9,950 9,950 Indirect Federal Grant-reimbursement for
January flood (EM0901)
9,950
EXPENDITURES
Repairs & Maintenance 51,000 9,950 60,950 Increase budget for Jan flood expenses
9,950
FUND 501 INSURANCE FUND
EXPENDITURES
Unemployment Claims 70,000 350,000 420,000 Increase Unemployment Claims
Ending Working Capital 2,481,972 (350,000) 2,131,972 Adjust Ending Working Capital
FUND 505 FACILITIES FUND
REVENUES
Property Management Services 2,254,800 (75,900) 6 2,178,900 Reduce lnterfund revenues for Theater
Capital Lease
(75,900)
EXPENDITURES
Capital Lease Principal 38,700 (38,700) 6 - Move Capiial lease to Theater division
Capital Lease Interest 37,200 (37,200) 6 - Move Capital lease to Theater division
(75,900)
FUND 518 INFORMATION SERVICES
REVENUES
ARRA- JAG Byrne Grant - 71,100 14 71,100 ARRA-JAG Byrne Grant Award to fund-
Video Surveillance system for new parking
facility - Res 4526 on 9/09/09
71,100
EXPENDITURES
Capital Equipment 493,100 71,100 14 Grant funded -video surveiliance system for
new parking garage -Res 4526 on 9/09/09
(81,000) 15 483,200 Reduce Capital Equipment budget 8 Transfer
Out to Fund 102 for ITS project
Operating Transfer Out - 81,000 15 81,000 Transfer Out to Fund 102 for ITS project
71,100
FUND 611 FIRE RELIEF & PENSIONS
EXPENDITURES
Salaries 110,000 41,700 151,700 Adjust for retro aclive Salary increase for
VRFA
Ending Fund Balance 2,918,626 (41,700) 2,876,926 Adjust Ending Fund Balance
Total Revenue (1,032,120)
Total Expenditures/Expenses (1,032,120)
F:\Budget Directory\2009 Budget\Budget Amendments\09 BA_3\Schedule A-BA# 3.XLS 11/16/20091:59 PM