HomeMy WebLinkAboutItems Submitted at the Meeting
Pr~~~qW Cz P(,o , sf- 1Vi e-hi
N
~ W E City of Au bu rn 2011-2016 AL, BURN
S Transportation Improvement Program
- - - 5 277TH•sT-:
j ,
~ 16
. . E sorn.sr r,e i ~
~ .
< _ / 1 I I SE28rs7-Sr
7
4 ~ 1 I I ~ u:e,uncr - - - - i
e:Nn cr
I ° I I
.
.
~ n, . ST H. L r~ ' \
)
~
r `.:tlliH :T I Z iI q2NU STN'H W 42NO-$TNEI\
9 iiencHV:
.eznerH sr_
: 292un sT
37TH ST NE _ _ _ _ ~ = W Q < r
I J5IMSTINE I ..r I F- N F
~ Z . JE st :9nTN ST C
W ~ a" J95rMS a CL1 ThG`
~5-lGATH ST ]E 2S5
a ~ g z 3 _ sE , sr~1, I E
,a i
~s,,^ N" Oc z z
11N0 ST N( "E196TH \vFY:
+ ~ F' 1 V 7 N I O Q < SE 307X ST y t
1E . SE W .99i11 PL = y - I. SE f9dTNPL ~
K-S . 3o07n . sT t 29r1i5r I m - .70THST NE )ATH 5T 1
'91 H.'t rvW Z y9TY1 ST II"~W 1 II 5! IOCTN iT i 5E t99T}i ~t
c r ~
n ~ Z C 'N£w:D i 36THI~ST nE N
i 302ND P_ _ G `01~1 ;l .r ~ I
Is 3o3w Iz ppMre ' \ - ~ I
T- 261M 57 H[ W 7 ' . I
[ ...s-~os.H sr f l ~:T.~+w= 3 ~unoa~~ I ~ . . _ ~ iosr.i sr ° . ~!sc 3wrri ST SE~ 304TH 5T
_ . ~
I i
I W w O .w~apci~. ns7.x o^`` p . . ~
SF 305TH VL I ~ 1
I o a :101:11 S' a ¢ a 0 + . ~ ' - . I ~ I.1
23n0::iWNE SE IOItH P1. I {{I
M'Z 3 F ' W Z.. . ~ a SE ICtlTH PL SE 307TI Pl I SE 7UiTN ST
STSTHC A SEJUOTHST
zn F
.~,sr
~I3
y F 3 3 ~ ' icr~,on t un,nTMS` ,e3iorH ST
' I
76T
H ST:NW Z . 1i1LHEr e = rv . L} 1 56
1 ;,`+s µ G 15TH-SrN ~ - ~ i,arncrKt > SE312TMg /
TIisr w
Q`:.I1 t4THSiNE- _ ~ u s 1f.11~lMCr .~.$.v /
i
S 316TH ST~ ~ I N Z I~ ~ Q ;t>>snis. ~ ~.TkrL
~ 7THSTN'_. Fy516'HY~w - u:116TH51. ~yWj '+5TNOL~ f.
' - 5 11 tlT1 11iHSiNE ' F lyl
snvr4isT - '10TH-ST,NE ,ornsrne 15 ~
8TN 5T NW s~zorHyr-- . . ' 3 ~
3zorinsr~''~
s N ro'(~ T4 I V I _ ~ JN ,
~ s 3i.Irn 5r ~ a nrn 51 nie
sr Ic
_ ' ROST 311RUVL r 7
' = y3 i . 'Is ' nTMSTn'[ t SC
u~°. n h~fq ~ - ~ .R~STN['
3fi"NW u
C D Si E
\ ~ s nnTH ' - \ ~ 1r sr ~~c
- ' ~ - -WMAIN•ST,.. .E.MAINST E MniIisr
` S 119TX PL 14/ $ ~ 1NU i E
1 c
. Y`~ Nirvo;ts[
' S311~TST - . ~ lt = J~L . ~ J G ~ ~aosrse ~norsE 'I ^
~
.
. ~,q ~ . - nrmssr \ .
`•_1.PEASLEY:~_ ~y STwSE- 3n
~ ~Q erHSTSw rrnsrx O_ . ~ -
~y orrsTSe LL,,
~ 3 (M1' ti ~ to IiSfSE - ST SE
' ` r ~ 'V?~Q,NPy ^ I.I%RMRLI JInY iM- 13TM5T
I
I . . iJTN Si SE W -
. . . .,157M:TSF
~ '--BOUNDAIRY-BL-uD=SW-=~-.o" ' ~,HSrse
:vri,srse, 1ZTH 5T SE
, r ,<rP~ 5T sE
I . . 2~tiT5T5E
CEO<N ON SE , 22ND SI SE W'l0,;
,]RO S! SE
P ~
N ' EaTN ST SE r i' S[
:STHSTSE M * 2 ~
~ Q zern sr se - - _ _ _ \
~ z~,M ST se
ZBTni:S[''.
~qFL`t
r - - 29TH ST SE
V MaAU OR iC~ ~ I
! ? ~ I IOTH ST ,
~ I ft.n LN Sf „ iIST ST Ii ~x K:t M1SO ~ i
~e3:nDrsE ~,w~o,css 9GB Srsc t
~ ..„S~setyE apsc 4{. ~ I~
L ~ ' . - ~
17 53s_ lSTHWPYSE
7'~H ;E- - ~
~ ~ S 17TNST;E . .
o aL sE S~( SE - I
167 22
_ r----~--• i
23 ~
2L ~ `1 JiiMSi;E ~
I a~ E ao "SM J ~Fy ~ < \ ~
s i a ~ ^ 4ArSF e` ~ 4 Z
L : . °R F < 'k
,,.I, ;r-,~ i
i -T <'~F~y
. i,
- ~
s.
esHsr se
. bCTN ST SE ~
, SE
1
J`` pgYHSt1E6~% I >TZ
. ~ pASA
kbVy SE
h Uy i i. ~I
~ s
ST 5EII a
1~3k~iT~E V
I Intersection Improvements Recommended Regional Projects ! Potential Annexation Areas
, - -
Parks _
~
Non-Motorized Improvements Prelim Eng and Misc Improvements Appendix B
I Water Feature
, r
Roadway Improvements - Signal Et ITS Projects ~
Aubum City Limits
.,R. . ..::.i. ~ .~:...r_= :..___,.`._....v_J . 1 .
F
t
C207Afl t ~ St NW. Phase 7(3rtl St NW to 942h St NW~ PS = i'.;
C409A0 3 Auburn Way Imp (4th St NE to 4th St SE) A'12 3.59d.951
C415A0 4 I St NE (40th St NE to 52nd St NE) N/A 11,827 - - 460A00 1.020,000 4,280,000 - 5.771.827
C201 AO 5 M St SE Grade Separation (E Main to AWS) PS 5,498,500 2,7 75,000 12,985,000 1,800,000 - - - - 22,398,500
C222A0 6 S 277th Street (AWN to Green River Bridge) A'71 19.085 - 276.500 803.500 3.000,000 - - - 4.099,085
cpxxxx 7 15th St SW Reconstruction (C St SW to UPRR) A'72 - - - 375,000 3,000,000 - - - 3,375.000
cpxxxx 8 A St NW. Phase 2(W Main to 3rd St NW) A'70 175,000 75.000 1,200.000 1.250000 - - 2.700,000
cpxxxx 9 D Sl NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW) A'14 - - - - - 200,000 200,000 6,000,000 6,400,000
CP0911 10 F St SE (4th St SE to AWS) A'13 7.620 - - 200.000 1.000.000 - - 1.207.620
cpxxxx 11 M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) A'13 - 50,000 - 275,000 1,000,000 - - 1,325,000
cpxxxx 12 Grade-Separated Crossing ot BNSF Railyard N/A - - - - - - 1.000.000 31.000.000 32.000.000
CP0916 14 W Valtey Hwy (SR 18 to W Main St) S 465,000 4,535,000 - - - - - - 5,000,000
cpxxxx 15 8th St NE (Pike St to R St NE) A'12 - - - 450.000 1,000,000 - - - 1,450.000
cpxxxx 16 49th St NE from Auburn Way North to M St NE WA - 850.000 2.500.000 • - - - - 3,350,000
Varies 33 Traffic Calming Improvements N/A 642,900 200.000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200.000 200,000 1.842,900
cpxux 39 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Pnase 3 A'14 - - - - - 100,000 750.000 - 850,000
cpxxxx 40 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 7 A'17 - 50.000 150,000 1.750.000 - - - 1.950.000
cpxxxx 41 724th Ave SE Cortidor Imp Phase 2 A'12 - - - 30.000 150,000 1.000.000 - - 7.180.000
cpxxxx 42 SE320thStCorridorlmp A'13 - - - - 30.000 60,000 58r000 - 670.00p
cpxxxx 52 Downtown Promenade Imp S - 6.800.000 - - - - - - 6.800.C!~0
Subtotal 11,012,559 21,993,500 17,211,500 6,337.200 13.625.000 7,840,000 2,730.000 37,000.000 117.749,759
CP0671 17 Harvey/Bth Sireet Imp - Debt Servlce N/A 2.127.842 87,700 97300 87.000 86.500 56.000 86.D00 996.000 3.644,;;42
CP0701 18 Bth StreeUR Street NE Trattic Signal S 647.400 1,000 - - - - - 648.400
cpxxxx 19 AuDUrn Way NortN7 Street NE Signal Imp A'11 - - 20.000 580,000 - - - 600.000
cpxcxx 20 Aubum Way South and M Sheet SE A'12 25.000 75.000 - 900.000 - - - 1,000.000
cpxxxx 21 C Street NW and West Main Street A'12 - - - 100,000 1.000.000 - - 1,100,000
cpxxxx 25 F Street SE & 4th St SE TraHic Signal S 396.700 7.000 - - - - - 397.700
cpxxxx 38 Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements A'12 - - - 150,000 850.000 - - 1,000.000
cpxxxx 43 Aubum Way South & Riverwalk Imp A'14 - - - - - 'SO,uOC 2 250 ,050 2.4D0.000
Subtotal 3.196,942 164,700 107,300 1,817.000 1.936,500 236.000 2,336.000 996,000 10,790,442
cpxxxx 13 South Auburn ITS Expansion S EC3,4GU 1.COi - - - BC»,377
Varies 34 7rafficSignallmp N!A 775,000 175,000 175.000 175.000 175.000 175.000 17,.000 7.225.000
cpxxxx 50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs A'13 - - 004 - 222 C00 98G_000 1,320.000
cpxxxx 51 East Valley Hwy ITS Expansion A'13 - - BJC.GGO - - 11CC.u00
Subtotal 978,400 176,000 175.000 175,000 1.195,000 175,000 395,000 880.000 4,149.400
cpxzxx 2 Auburn Way South Corndor Improvements Phase 1 A'10 - '1 60.0oG u60 ,8G2 aa5.8o~
C50780 22 Skinner qd to 3rd Ave (Auburn Pacific Trail Ph 2) S 162,077 1,000 - - - - 153,07;
C229A0 23 BNSFlFast Valley Hwy. Ped Undercrossing PS 224.300 - - - - 4.800,000 5,00O.000 10,024.300 cpncxx 24 Aeademy Drive Multi Use Treil A'72 - - 10,000 150,000 425,000 425.000 7.010,000 I
NA 26 Auburn Communiry and Lakelantl Shuttles N/A 300.628 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1.620.628
Varies 30 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Progrem WA 100,000 - 100.000 - 100,000 - 100,000 400,000 I
Varies 31 CitywideArterial Bicycle & Safety Imp N/A 19,300 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 619.300 ~
Varias 32 CitywideSidewalkimprovements N/A 225,100 780,000 20.000 180.000 20.000 180,000 20,000 - 825,100
cpxxxx 44 A St NE Pedestrian Improvements A'12 - - - 150.000 - - - 150,000
cpxxxx 45 Interurban Trailhead Improvements A'13 - - - 210.000 - - 210,000
cpxxxx 53 37th St SE & R St SE Pedestrian Connector S 124,300 1.000 - - - - 125,300
cpxxxx 57 Lea Hill Pedestrian Improvements A'10 - - 353.900
Subtotal 1,755,705 719.080 1.417,620 660.000 800.000 925.000 5.665.000 5.000.000 16,342.405
cpxxxx 27 415t St SE antl A St SE Access Manaqement Study
C470A 29 S 277tn Street-WeUand Mitigation N'A 203.640 _'5.000 z5.000 25,000 - - - 278,640
cpxxxx 46 704th Ave SE & Green River Study N/A 2.00U 3.000 - - - - - 5,000
cpxxux 47 Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study N/A - 5,000 - - - - - 5.000
cpxxxx 48 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Imp Study WA 2,000 8,000 - - - - 10,000
cpxuxx 49 S. 376th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Imp Study N/A 1.000 4,000 - - - - - 5.000
cpxxxx 54 Kersey Way Study N/A - 100.000 - - 100,000
cpxxxz 55 Mary Olson Farm Improvements N/A 137 u8; ? 000 - - - - - 139.085
Subtotal 345.725 156A00 25.000 25.000 - - - - 551.725
cpxxxx 28 Annual Bndge Maintenance N,'A ~7i`0 -
Varies 35 Arterial Streets (105 Fund) N/A 1,505,OG0 1.400A00 1,400.000 1.400.000 1,400.000 1,400A00 '.,dOU.OGJ 9.905,O0G
Varies 36 Arlerial Crack Seal (105 Fund) N/A 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 700,000
Varies 37 Local Streets - SOS (103 Funtl) N/A 6.108,900 2200,000 2,200,000 2200,000 2.200.000 2,200,000 2,200.000 19,308.900
Subtotal 7,763.900 3.750.000 3.750.000 3.750,000 3.750,000 3.750.000 3.750.000 - 29.911900
TOTAL 24.453,231 26,959,280 22,686,420 12,764,200 21,306,500 12,926.000 14,876,000 43.876,000 179,497,631
from I-405 to Sr-78, add one NB and SB generel purpose lane: from SR-18 to SR-161, add one NB HOT lane antl one SB HOT lane, add direct
N/A 80 SR-767 Expansion (1405-SR509) - WSDOT NB/SB HOVlHOT lane connection ramps between SR-167 & 1405: add NB and SB auziliary lanes between SR576 and S 277th StreeC extend 4.400.000A00
Sr 167 from SR-161 to SR-509. N!A 81 SR-18 & SR-1671nterChange - WSDOT Complete freeway interchange by adding eastbound SR-78 ramp to southbound SR-167, adding northbound SR-167 ramp to WB SR-18 and 45,000.000
closing SR-18 access to West Valley Highway.
N/A 82 SR-764 Corridor Improvements (SR-18 to Academy Drive) - Construct corridor improvements consistent with WSDOT SR-164 Corridor Improvement Study. Project includes intersection improvements, 61,000,000
WSDOT roadway widening and roadside improvements.
N/A 83 SR-164 Auburn Bypass Road (SR-164 to SR-18) - WSDOT Construct Auburn bypass road conneciing SR-164 and SR-78 east of R ST corridor. 65,000.000
N/A 84 Green River Class I Trail, (SR•18 to Northem Ciry Limit) - King Construct Class I Trail along Green River from SR-18 to Northem City limits. 2,000.000
Coun
N/A 85 51st Ave S& S 316th St Signal - King Counry Construct new traffic signal at intersection of St st Ave S and S 316th St with turn lanes. 650,000
N/A 86 Stewart Road Widening (EVH to SR•167) - Pierce County Complete a five lane section roadway with new bridge over the white river and railroad grade separation from EVH to SR-167. 32,300,000
N/A 87 Auburn Transit Station Parking Garage-SoundTrensit Construct a new parking garage at the Auburn Transit Station 31,600.000
TOTAL 4,637,550.000
'Grant S=5ecurer,
Status pS = Partially Secured
A= Applied or will apply
10 = Year
Af)pC'/2di_v A
, . ...i. . 1 . {'4 ~ V ~ • " ~ ► 4rv .d/ _
~ I .
. . ~tL~Ji..~i'~i,.~ i✓ ~ . i-
7 LtV e~~!'{ I 1i
• P4i~i7i i
.
MEMORANDUIVI 20I0 AUG 2 PM 2 30
TQ: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS 5,~,~--ed PCDC
FROIVI: DANIEL B. HEID, CITY ATTORNEY--IRV~7.
. ~
DATE: JULY 30, 2010 ~
11"fT_ T[InT Tl"O 1'fL`!S A DT7TT/"! 1T TA P"tZ-~ r z~cti l~LLASI
~ .~o xa ~ rsti- ~ •rr • - - Recently,. at a Planning and Community Development Committee 1Vleeting, I understand that a ,
question was asked 'about why or how the City 'Council is still (continuing) to be involved in
quasi-judieial matters. The question dealt with the RPG Development and a development
agreement pursuant to the former Chapter 14.21 of the Auburn City. Code EACC~ enacted in-
2006 by Ordinance No. 5992; and subsequently repealed in 2008 by Ordinance No. 6817.
Even though~Cliapter 14.21 AeE has now been repealed,.certain projects may still be "vested"
so thai they still opera.te under the repealed codes. Under the vesting law of the -State of Washington, development rights vest at the time a
developer files a complete and 1ega11y sufficient permit applica.tion. RCW 19.27.095(1); Adams
v. TFiurston County, 70 Wn. App. 471, 855 P.2d 284 (1983); West Main Associgtes v. Bellevue,
106' Wn.2d 47, 720 P.2d 782 (1986); Valley view Industrial Park v. hedtnond, -107 Wn:2d 621,.
733 P.2d 182 (1987); and Noble llfianor. Co. v. Pierce County, 81 Wn.2d 141, 913 P.2d 417
. , (.1996). . : -
The da.te on which development rights vest determines which laws, rules and policies will apply
• to the deyelopment. The development. is controlled by the laws in effect at the time of vesting, .
not laws later enacted. W. est Main Associates v. Bellevue, 106 Wn.2d at 50-51; Victoria Tower.
Partnership v: Seattle, 49 Wn.2d 755, 761-62, 745 P.2d 1328 (1987).
You should also knowthat the doctrine of vesting righfs, as it.applies in the Sta.te of Washington,
~ is a minority iul-e in tlie: United 'Sta.tes. _"Washington's vesting-rule runs counior tovthe
overwhelming' majority rule that `development . is not immune. from - subsequent adopted
regulations until a building permit has -been obtained and substantial development has occurred
on reliance on the pemut':" Noble Manor Company, 81 Wn: ;App. at 144; ~citing Erickson & Associtztes, Inc: v. McLerran, 123 Wn.2d 864, 868,. 872 P.2d 1090 (1984), (quoting, Richard L.
Settle, Washington Land Use and Environmental Law and;Practice, Section 2.7 at 40 (1983)).
However, the City has already made the determination that R.l'G has vested under ACC.14.21.
. During the time that the Chapter 14.21 ACC was in effect, the City received sufficient maferial
applying for that process from RPG regarding its property at the north end of the City, such tha.t . .
RPG would havty been'pemutted, so long as It desires to. do so, to develop within the scope of the
development agreement under the now repealed. Chapter 14.21 ACC: That, of course, mandates
that RPG comply with the requirements of ACC 14.21, wluch they still need to do..
' . -
ISSUES'REGAR.DING COUNCIL QUASI-JUDICIAL ROLE - VESTING
July 30, 2010 . , ~ . .
. Page2
'
,
RPG could choose to develop pursuant to the current existing codes, but. if it RPG's intention to
develop pursuant to that'earlier code, it would be entitled to do so: However, again; it would
need to comply with the requirements that existed in connection with that Chapter.
~~~umi^.s~ ~RG-1-A#eAdS tO-p11TSllB deVPlUpm .nt umdPr A('['. 14_71; it could seek approval of a__..___,_ _
devel'opment agreement under the process spelled out in the ClYapter so long. as- it meets the
requirements that were speeified therein. In such a case, the City Council would be the decision
making body for approval of the process and approval of the application, as well as, essentially a,
determination that the criteria that must be met. in orsier for RPG to qualify for the use of this process have likewise been satisfied. ,
The result of this (vesting) is that RPG ".`could" utilize the former code sections if it qualifies, and thax would keep the City Council involved ia making the quasi judicial decisions involved in this
development, including whether to enter into a Development Agreement with R.PG. The City's irisurance authority made a strong case fox the City Couneil to remove itself from
quasi-judicial decisions beca.use of cases such as Mission Springs, Inc., vs. City of Spokane, 134
Wn.2d 947, 954 P.2d 250 (1998)' where the court found Spokane liable for decisions that were made by the city council that the couFt later found to. be problematic. Additionally; i€ the city
council is not involved in quasi judicial decision-making, councilmembers aze more freely able
to tallc to their constituents - as they would then not be subject to the limitations imposed on elected officials who are engaged in quasi judicial decision-making. • .
Even though the City Council is no longer engagiiig in quasi: judicial.decision making for suck
matters that would come before tlie City now, because of the: existing vesting that APG,has~under
the.former process, the City Council would have this matter still-before it, as it may have if there .
. ' were other ma.tters that vested prior to the change in the City Code. .
Please also ~be aware..that even thoul* th% Development Agree;nent process is no lon; gex.,
available under ACC Chapter 14.21, there is (still) a statutory process available .under Chapter
36.70B RCW, but`#hey are not the same. The Development Agreement under ACC Chapter ,
14.21 was a replacement approach for (former) Planned Unit Developrients. The stautory..
Development AgTeement is a mechanisrn for development utilizing the local government's standards but applies flexibility in such things as duration and phasing, consistent with applicable
development regulations of the local government
. If there aze any questions in these regards, please lei me lnow. Thank you. . cc: Department Directors; City Clerk.. You may remember the V1lCIA concems about the Mission Springs case, whete the City Counciimembers
. themselves were- found to be personally liable.
.
V 13
;
• CITYOFAUBURN
~ . 2010 6UDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A" I
Budget Amendmerrt # 7 Ordinance 6323
1
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUNT#/DESCRIPTION. BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
GENERAL FUND 001:,
REVENUE•
Card Games 700,000 (300,000) 400,000 Reduce Gambling Tau 2venue per Ord.
6315 on 7N6/2010
Interfund Rerrtals - 300,000 1 300,000 Intertund rent from uGlides for City Hall Mnex
CaPital Lease
CHANGE IN REVENUE - ' ,
EXPENDITURES:
Non Departmental
Capitai Lease Interest 482,000 300,000 1 782.000 Ciry Hall Mnex Capital Lease
Debt Service Prindpal , 184,000 1,090,000 1.274,000 Valley Comm Debt Refinazrc9ng
Debt Service Irrterest 66,900 ' (38,000) 28,900 Vallsy Comm De6t Refinancing
Transfers:0ut 2,307,600 3,600 2 2.317 ,200 Transfer out to Fire Pension & Relief for Fre
Insurance PremGun
.CHANGE IN EXPENDITURES 1,555,600 1;355;600 '
Designa4ed Ertcring Fund Balanee ' 1,060,300 2,000 1,062,300 Adust ErKfing Fumd Baiarxe
Undesignated Endiog fund balance 8,030,788 (1,357,600) " 6.673,166 Acoust Ending Fumd Balance
FUND 102 ARTERIAL STREET .
EXPENDITURES
Debt Service PrirtGpal 130,400 7.000 , 137.400 ' Debt Service inaease for PWTFL 08-951-
002 M ST NE/ Harvey Rd
Undesignated Ending Fund Balance 1,007,363 (7,000) 1,000,383 Acrjust Ending Furni Balance
FUND 117 DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
EXPENDITURES
Irrtergovemmental Payments - 20,000 20,000 Ciry of Aubum's portion of VNET SWA7
vehiGe
Undesignated Ending Fund Balance 559,847 (20,000) 539,847 Adjust Ending Fund Balance
FUND 230 CITY HALL ANNEX 2010 AB.B BOND DEBT '
REVENUES
. .
201 . 08 Bond Subsidy 223,400 223,400 20108 LTGO Armex Tax Subsidy '
Transfer In - 260,800 3 Transfer In REET 1 from Fund 328 for dabt
, service
450,000 4 710,800 Transfer In from Fund 505 irrterturid rerd tn
Pay debt service
934,200
EXPENDITURES
` DebYService Principal - 280,000 260,000 2010A LTGO Mnex Principal
- DebYService Interest - 35,700 2010A LTGO Armex Interest
838,500 874,200 2010B LTGO Annex Interest
934,200
FUND 291 LOCAL REVITALIZATION 2010 CBD BOND DEBT
REVENUES ,
Locel Revftalizatlon Sales Tax Credit - 62,500 82,500 Moved from Fund 328, 4 mos LRF Sales?ax
_ •
Credit
2010D Bond Subsidy - 72,100 72.100 2010D LTGO LRF Tex Su6sidy
Trensfers In - 253,700 6 253,700 Transfer In REET2 from Fund 328 far Local
Reviplizatlon tlebt service
388,300
EXPENDITURES
Debt Service Prfncipal - 105,000 105,000 2010C LTGO LRF Prindpal
Debt Serviee Interest - - 14,700 2010C LTGO LRF Interest
206,100 220,800 2010D LTGO LRF Interest
EnEing Fund Balance 82.500 82,500 . Adjust Endng Fund Balance
- , - 388.300
F:16udget Directory\2010 BudgetlAmendments\BA#71BA# 7 Schedule A.XLS 1 8/5/20105:09 PM
.
• aTY oF ausuRN
- 2010 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Arriendment #7 Ordlnance 6323
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED BUDGET
ACCOUIYT#f DESCWP'iION BUDGET ' AMENDMENT BUDGET ADJUST.
FUND 321 PARK CONSTRUCTION ` REVENUE3
'Property Tmc - 100,000 100.000 Parks Prop 2 Levy
CoMrlbuUons & Donations 1,000,000 (220,000) 780,000 Boys 8 GiAS Gub donatlon
(120.000) EXPENDITURES .
Ending Fund Balance 427,966 _ .(120,000) 307,968 Acrjust Ending Fund Belance
(120.000)
FUND 328 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
REVENUES " -
Loeal Revifallzation Sales Tax Credit 250.000 (250,000) - New Furui 230 created to pay L.ocal •
Revifalization debt serviee
Interest Eamings - Notes - 34,100 34,100 Irrterfund loan for golt & UD 350 rwte
(215,900)
EXPENDITURES
Construcdon Projeds (664,300) City Hail Piaza moved to Fund 330 in BPN
Debt Service Principal, 563,000 (563,000) New fund created ro pay City Hall Mnex debt
service
DebYService Principal 750,000 (750,000) Newfund created to pay Local Revitalfzatlon
, debt service ,
Debt Service Interest 166,000 . (166.000) - Naw fund created 6o pay City Hell Mnex debt
service
Debt Service Interest 100,000 (100,000) - New fund aeated ao pay Local Revitaliziitlon
debt service
Transfer Out-REET 1 • 1,855,000 260,800 3 Transfer Out REET1 to Fund 230 tor Ciry Hali
Annex Debt
Transfer Out-REET2 91,500 ~ 253,700 5 Trarufer 0ut REET2 W Fund 231 for Lopl
Revitalixadon Debt
Ending Fund Balance 3,040,530 912,900 3,953,430 Adust Ending Fund Balarxe
(215.900)
FUND 430 WATER'
EXPENDI7'URES.
Professional Services 509,000 (189,500) 309,500 Reduce budget per 2011-2012 budget
Ending Working Capital 2.294,399 199,500 2.493,889 Aoust Eat Encring Wmldng Capital
FUND 431 SEWER -
EXPENOtTURES
IMergoverrimental Services - 10,971,600 288,400 11,200,000 Inaease to reHect Metro's rate increase
Ending Working Capital 3,035,344 ..(288.400) 2,746,844 Adust Est EndUig Working Capitel
FUND 435 AIRPORT
REVENUES' .
Federal Grants 349,800 B 349,800 Runway Lightlng Federal Grant Award
- ' State GraMsw 8.400 6 8,400 . Runway Ligh6ng State mffich 358.200
EXPENDI7URES
ProfesSfOnel Services . 455,400 75,000 ~ 530,400 Reid Middleton contract
Constniction Projects , 75,000 375,000 6 Rurnvay Light Project ,
100,000. 550,000 Hangar Roof Repair
Ending Working Capital 900;142 (116,800) 783,342 Adust Est Ending Working Cepital
358,200
PUND 437 ,CaOLF
EXPENDITURES
Professional Services . 70,500 , (20.000) 50.500 Reduce budget per 2011-2012 budget
Ending Working Capital - 208.868 20,000 ' 228,668 Acryust Es[ Ending Worldng Cepital
F:16udget Directory12010 BudgetlAmendments\BA# 7\BA# 7 Schedule A.XLS 2 8/5120105:09 PM
CIIY OF AUBURN ~
. 2010 BUDGET AMENDMENT "SCHEDULE A"
Budget Amendment # 7 Ordinance 6323
CURRENT REQUESTED REVISED . BUDGET
ACCOUNT#/DESCRIPTION` BUDGET AMENDMENT BUDGET' ADJUST.
FUND 605 FACILITIES
REVENUES
InterfundRentals 2,597,510 450,000 4 3,047,510 IMerfundRerrtiromutilitlesforCity Hall
_ Arviex
. 450.000 '
EXPENDITURES
Transfer Out - 450,000 4 450,000 Transfer Out to Fund 230 debt service for
irtilities 450.000
FUND 550 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EXPENDITURES
Construction Projeets 350,000 (317,000) 33,000 Reduce Construcdon projects per 2011-2016
CFP
Ending Working Capital 4,540,654 317,000 4,857,654 - AdJust Est Ending Working Capital
FUND 611 FIRE RELIEFB PENSION
_REVENUES.
Transfer In 60,000 3,600 2 63,600 Increase Transfer In from General Fund for
FIre Insurence Premium
3,600 •
, Undesignated Ending Fund Balance . 2,789,242 3,600 2,792,842 Adjust Ending Fund Balance
3,600
. . Total Revenue 1,798,400
ToEaI ExpenditureslEzpenses 1,798,400
F:1Budget Directory\2010 Budget\AmendmentslBA#7\BA# 7 Schedule A.XLS 3 815/20105:09 PM