HomeMy WebLinkAboutItems Submitted at the Meeting
Chapter 18.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS Page 1 of 3
PCD
ti C 3/14%11 P
V. D MasterPlan"CeS 3 . .
Amendmerrt od
Submittecl by: Elizabeth C. '
18.02.130 Neighborhood review meeting.
A. Purpose. The purpose of the neighborhood review meeting is for a developer/applicant of a
proposed project to hold a meeting with surrounding and adjacent neighboring residents,
property owners, homeowners' associations, residents and businesses (hereinafte'r collectiVely
refeRed fo as "neighbors") prior to submitting an application to the city. The neighbors would
have an early opportunity to become familiar with eittier a residential subdivision, multifamily or mixed development proposal of a certain size and scale early in the development review process
and to identify any associated issues. The neighborhood review meeting is intended to assist in
producing applications that are responsive to neighborhood concems, and to reduce the,
likelihood of delays and appeals. The city expects an applicant to take into consideration the
reasonable concems and recommendations of the neighbors and other interested persons
when preparing an application.
B. Applicability. A neighborhood review meeting shalF be required for the following types of new
land use application in any applicable zoning district within the city:
1. A residential subdivision project comprising 40 or more lots or units; or
2. A multifamily residential projecfi comprising 40 or more units; or
3. A mixed-use development "project comprising 40 or more units.
C. Time Frames.
1. Prior to submittal of an application, an applicant shall provide an opportunity to meet with
neighboring residents, property owners, homeowners' associations, residents and
businesses (hereinafter collectively referred to as °neighbors") within the city-specified
notice radius to review the proposal.
2. The applicant shall not be required to hold more than one neighborhood review meeting.
D. Procedures.
1. The applicant shall select the meeting time and place. The starting time selected shall
be limited to a weekday evening after 6:00 p.m. or.a weekend at any, reasonable time and
shall not occur on a federally recognized holiday. The meeting shall be held at a location
open to the public and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The.public
meeting shall be held within the Aubum city limits, at'a location no further than two miles
from the project site, unless an alternate meeting location is approved by the planning
director. A sign at least 22 inches by 28 inches in size with minimum two-inch lettering
shall be placed at the main entrance of the building where the meeting will take place at least one hour prior to the meeting. Such sign will announce the meeting purpose, fhat the
meeting is open to the public and that interested persons are invited to attend. Ttiis sign
shall be removed upon conclusion of the meeting 6y the applicant.
2. The applicant shall send by regular mail a written notice announcing the neighborhood
review meeting to the director of the city of Aubum planning and development department
and property owners within 300 feet of the property(ies) involved in the development review
application. The notice shall include the date; time and location of the meeting and briefly
discuss the nature and location of the proposal: The notice shall be mailed not less than 20
http:Uwww.codepublishing.com/walAubum/auburnl8/auburn1802.htm1 3/14/2011 .
,
Chapter 18.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS ' Page 2 4. 3
~
calendar days prior to the meeting date. The mailing list shall be obtained by the applicant
and based on the most recent property tax assessment rolls of the King County department
of assessments or the Pierce County assessor-treasurer's office; whichever is applicable. -
3. Not less than 20 calendar days prior to the neighborhood review meeting, the applicant
shall post a notice on the property which is the subject of.the proposed application. The
notice shall be posted at the property in a visible and accessible location. The notice-shall
state that the site may be subject to a proposed development and shalF,set forth the name .
of the applicant and a telephone number where the applicant or applicant's contact person
can be reached for additional information. The site shall remain* posted until the conclusion
of the neighborhood review meeting. The city will not be responsible for posting of'any
signs. -
4. The sign at the building entrance under subsection (D)(1) of this section, the notices
sent by mail under subsection (D)(2) of this section and the site posting under subsection
(D)(3) ofthis section shall each contain the following statement:
The intent of this meeting is to facilitate an early informal discussion between the ,
project developer and the neighbors regarding the project. While required by the City
of Aubarn; this meeting is not conducted by the City of Aubum and is in addition to any
future hearings or public comment opportunities available under city development
review processes.
5. At the neighborhood review meeting, the applicant shall describe the proposed
application to persons ih attendance. The attendees may identify any issues that they
believe should be addressed in the application and recommend that those issues be
submitted for city consideration and analysis. - "
6. The applicanf shall prepare and make available the following materials'for review and
discussion at the public meeting: ,
a. Total number of dwelling units/lots expected to be built;
b. Conceptual site plan/plat layout showing buildings, road layout, landscape,
parking, topography and open space areas, and adjacent properties; and
c. Aerial photograph showing the subject property and adjacent properties.
7. At the neighborhood review meeting, a sign-in sheet shall be distributed to all meeting
attendees that speeifes the date, time and location of the neighborhood ceviewmeeting
and asks for the name, address, phone number and electronic mail address of each
meeting attendee. . .
8. At the neighborhood, review meeting, the applicant shall take notes of the discussion on
the proposed applicafion for eventual submittal to the city.
E. Submittal Requirements. the applicant shall submitthe following information with the
submittal of a development application:
1. A copy of the notice provided to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the
proposed development site.
2. A copy of the mailing list used to send out meeting notices.
http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/Auburn/auburnl8/auburn1802.htm1 3/14/2011
, C~hapter 18.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS Page 3 of 3:
3. A written statement containing the information posted on the property.
4. An affidavit of mailing and posting notices.
5. A copy of the meeting sign-in sheet.
6. Copies of written materials and eight-and-one-half-inch by 11-inch size plans presented
at the neighborhood review meeting.
7. Notes of the meeting including a summary of oral and written comments received.
8. If responses to the meeting notice were not received by the applicant and no one
attended the neighborhood review meeting or persons in attendance made no commenfs,
the applicant shall submit evidence as indicated above, with the notes reflecting the
absence of comment, attendance, or both.
F. Notice.
1. All property owners who receive notice of the neighborhood review meeting shall be
eligible to receive a copy of the written city decision for the development proposal.
2. All neighbors receiving notice of or attending the neighborhood review meeting shall be
eligible to receive a copy of the written city decision for the development proposal through a
request made to the city.
G. Consideration. The city shall consider as part of the development review process the,
concems and issues raised by the neighbors and applicant at the neighborhood review meeting,
including any agreed-upon solutions or resolutions to outstanding issues or areas of contention.
The city, however, shall not be bound in its decision-making by any agreements or
understandings made between the neighbors and applicants. Nothing in this section shall be
construed to delegate design or project review decision-making authority to the participants in
the public meefing.
H. City Involvement. The neighborhood review meeting is intended to be a developer-
neighborhood interaction. City staff are not required to attend and/or participate in neighborhood
review meetings. There will be otherofficial opportunities for residents and neighbors to make
comment during the development review process that would follow the neighborhood review
meefing. The director of the planning and development department or designee shall be notifed
a minimum of seven calendac days prior to the scheduled date of the neighborhood review
meeting. Any city staff attendance at a neighbofiood review meeting is for informational
purposes only, does not representthe city's position on the merits of the development proposal
and does not constitute a❑ approval or denial of an application, now or submitted in the future.
. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6245 § 2, 2009.)
http://www.codepublishing.eom/wa/Auburn/auburnl8/auburn1802.html 3/14/2011
PCDC 3/14/11 Pgs. 11
' V. B. Potential Locations of
, Off Leash Dog Parks
Submitted by: Daryl Faber
OFF LEASH DOG PARK
SITE SUGGESTIONS - 2011
Auburndale
.
~ - - -
1 . `
i .
4
• ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~A ~ f~r
y~ L - - 'R~ y~. . • . ~
- - 1 ~ ~ nti • ~ 1'~}`
~ ~ • , 4.-
' 4 e ~ • t ; r Lr "F;
_.T L..
r. ..~f ' yd~y,., ; . ~ .
4. _ I':._ AK. ' - ' - i..
PI'OS:
l. almost an acre and can be expanded even further
2. good buffers between off leash area and nearest neighbor
3. uses an under utilized part of the park
4. provides a location for Lea Hill residents
Cons:
1. have to create parking
2. have to get the neighborhood to buy into it
3. no restroom facilities
Roegner Park
1 ~
~ ~ , . ~ ~ " t
• }f.. ~ ~ ,v ar-y~. ~ ~fs ~ ~`~4 t ~ •Y
1 . y.C ~F s' !P • ~ ~ , . ~ ~ - ~
~ ~ F ~ ' ~ ~ ~ * ~
0 -
~ ~ ' y • • 7, ~
. ~ , ' , -
. _ ~T~~ , j ' • ~
' ~t 1~,~'iM(`~"^ ,~t` i~; iu~"'~ ~ ♦ ' . ,r
~ • r s.~
Pros:
1. under utilized part of the park
2. restroom facility at park
3 one acre site available with room to expand
4. many dog owners already utilize the White River Trail to walk their dogs
5. river access
Cons:
1. limited parking, may have to look at school to help with parking
Isaac Evans Park
' Vi itc. -"?j Am . ~
*~`r '7Rq- •
~ J
~ ' T ~ ' '6 . ~Y '
~ _ ~ • re~ 4"/r~ ' ,
` .C j ~ 2 x `y~~ ,'~_y, ~F:~~ , ` '
w~r
~ , ~ ~r'° . ~ ~"~r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,
~ . d ; • ~ ~ ~ 3 ,
~ ' • ~ ~ ' ~ , ~-#~`""~a
;:rveR:
~ • r~"~as__ . _ .
' • ~~r 4 ~ " - -
ovivc ~ i ~ ~ i ~
PCOS:
1. under utilized part of the park
2. no neighboring property to woi-ry about
3. can expand to over an acre
4. restroom facility at north end of park
Cons:
1. parking lot will need to be expanded
I
Lakeland Hills Site
. - - , . ~ - - "•-1
. ~ ~ _ ~ ; " • ' i . i ` ~x
. ',y • , ~ . ~'.q,. l ,~1'i . ~ . ~ i
rj+ 11~• `~.r ~1.~ ?,re" ' ~
I I".K
~,.a - ~i~• `y `
~ i
~~~5~.~ ~ ~ ~ t~. '~;'M~' ~ fa. `i , ~
~ „ ' ~ `~1'l5~ • ` ~ fib
~ -~~'i ^ ~ . ~ r _ 1' •
~ + ~ r •~~~y ~ i~ t :
~
~q r +w ;
~ t~, ~y+ . i. ; ~ • ~ ~ f '~4 . J~ ~="v~'¢.'~ Y~ I
. ~ i R~~ ~5?~`~. . i + ~ ~ ~~~~.I
~ ' ~..~t ' • a ~ ~r , r; .
. ,
.
r
. ~ ~
a. .sF. ~ " ~
Pros:
1. serve the Lakeland Hills community
2. utilizes an undeveloped piece of property
3. only one adjacent home owner to work with
Cons:
1. a little over a 1/2 acre site with no room to expand
2. limited parking
3. no facilities
Game Farm Park ~
"_44 t~
Ia~ _ ~ ~ ^ ~ • ~ ~
- ~ * # _ • - ~ ~ ``+5
a~•~Rers N ~ . . r- ,1 ~
r tt.
4~.~ ~
7~~
°'I a`~l • ~ - y,~' . ~ '
TMDlT1F C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '
-~ti • ~ t }
• . 0 h ~
A "A l,A..~e ~f AU
. 1_
~~Mx t. j, . A. { . ,
~ ~ ` -tR~-' ~ i~'~t- 4 - , ~ ~ ~ _
Q f. . . DS06ibF = ..IA& ~••.}S / A
PPOS:
1. plenty of parking
2. restroom facilities
3. the detention pond area is a space not used at a busy park
4. the area behind the ball field can be expanded to an acre
Cons:
1. homerun balls flying into the off leash area by base ball field
2. discuss with neighbors for ball field location
3. the detention pond has had water in it three times in the last ten years
.
_.F• 't ~ ` ~ ' y ' jx
1
_ _ ~ ~ _ t Y M r ~ , j . • -
- r .
y - "f TM t ~ - ' ~ ~d
_ 'Li c ` .
iN;•~,.
. 1,~, 'i ~~1y ` { • ~ ` ~ ' .
~IK:'' _ vk t ~ • - i,.
i ' • , :*~±ket ~ `
~:x•.' ,a_._~. > t_ ti
r .
~yq~ _ ~ ! ~ ~F • . , ' ; '
~ ~rr" ~ ; 't , - : • '
i' -z~ ,
' r~3~ " ~1-Y
d .
4-i
J x~
r,
~ • . ~y -
- 1
:
- . t ~ , x E ~ e i' - ;~?1'~: , ~t ~ . ' •
_ ~ _ _ .y, : y~ - k ~
` ~I^•~ -1~ ~ q . ~ r.
~ ~ i . ~ ~ , ~a`• '
:
,.b : .
' ~ ti i 4 -a .~Js '~'~y ^~'~a. ta~~a~- ~ ~ ~ ~ t-/_~y1~~,~. ✓ 4 "y "yK ' ~r - x~yi ~ y ~ . . 4
' ~ ~ y ~ ~ . ~f. _ 'f' ~F ~ ~ * \+Y~~ 1~ ~ ~ ~.~T' A r ~M ~ ; ''J5•~ _xv . ~'N '4- . ib.~ ~ . . • y i__
~ e ~ " ' ~ ~1~e~.~a'~Y~~~~,~r ~+V~t~ r~ r7 ~ ~•rf . ~'~a.°... o ~L~~-. 7
ti ~v'k' . ~~~~X,^... ~ t;, ~ ''~'}'~T. t `'~,t~e;,aG d~~,,~ ~.~i„f-'F~p~+~9L7 ~Y~~_
~ ' ~ I''~• y'sa ~ ~ .A•3~`y'.M~ i'~, y z :~k lyy~~_+`_ a ` .-1►...; y~A.~Ic~. " ~°.t.~ ~1~ `~A~~ a~ ~
♦ a
, y y _ ~ ,N ~ f~ asy~~,. A~ i.M~, . CY ~J"''. Yrt` ~y~w ~.+G]c
y ~t ~ ` . ' . - , . ~ '~y{. f v ~ . - V ~v!~r w'~:~ t ~ ~~a ~ J~ "f ~ ,~ir `r ~ ~ . Y„*ik~~-.~.~ •.gt .
~:~'A~, . • . r.. - . -S ~ ~ ~R
~ , ti • ~ •k'J ~~r,~Y , i .,i • ~ ~,/.~A' ~ !fir_ ~'~'L. .O-a~,-L ~"~~.~.yt, .~~„t~ '~.~,~a.. nF ~ .
~ i ~ ) r'. ti, < < = {r°y~w.t • `-i~ ~~sf~ .'~.s,+pi,~ ' k.~T''~•~14 "w. ?+rl,..X
~ ~ 'S ~ S t~l'' 1 ~ y.-.+~ _ ~.rr ~ 2- Pf SR~'~ ~r - ~.'4 n a!. . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 'L. i1.,. ~
ti~~', i 1 i~ f i~ ~f ~r p~ ~e- tti ~
~ ' ' '1 - ~ 41 ~},.r .r.L~ ~ 1+Ar yC.~J` r : h ♦
• '
F t K~.I d ' ~ ' 3 . r _ 4~ ~ M . . r. ,~".~M~t i''~'~:7~' 'M ~ - t' ,,.w Fwi
• .
' ' 5~~~?`y~d~e~`~r } 4 r z.w W ~ ~ i .
4 d4 • , y ti y ~F~v- •
^ i " e ~y ~ ~ } ~ • . a ' ; ~
~ 1 . 7. T a~ ~ . . ~,ff, _ ~z` ~r .^S _ ~G' . i;~ d . ...~v. ~ ,,M ~ n~I r ~'70 r . io .
U ~ ti ~y. ~ ,w , ~ ~T~`' r.~ yk% ~ 'i~ • Ci~ S
• 'y ~ ,y; . 'r. ~ ' ` ~ Q „s .r t , ~ ~
• ~ § t ~ ,,i~'~,~ Y~~S~Y t . . ~a.` Hy}' ~-v . L 'r . . . ~ r y~F ~/s ti an~?., • .
74-
, .T, ~ ,~~4!y~ ~~~~ti, ~~r ~ ~r~,. ~ ~ _ w~~✓ . - . '9 a - ~°".ti~!„~ ~1'~~ ",s + ,}r+
A'~
~ ~ `v, •
51~
_ ~ r'A ~+~.~`A"~ ~ . ~ , ~ _ - y.-~ . : ' •,1 ~i.f.- ~~:,,Rpy'r[a'~ r : ••~w~ ~ • ~
• ' N , - , t, _ ...w' +5 ^S.~•~t~ . # ti :-_y. ~ ~ ~ . . - . . - .
' . ~ ~ ~ 7 ~~t . , ~ . ? Y. xft ~ wn.1~ ~ , - . ~ . ~
A~ - ~ 1 ~•`J . ~ ~ --sa.-_ . , , ~
_ ~Y . i~ ~ • _Y
,r' • ' ' ~t~ ; ~ . ,
wA6
•9 ~
-
4 ¢ p u j~
M nr • i~,. .
~
FENCE OPTIONS
" ~j~.+` ' x.s:~ ' ~
y m ` y
N. a i ~ 7 .
J ~5 ~ `~1 4 ~ , x
' ~ ~ ~`t~,~"Y a. _ 7G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 , _ ~ eETV
l v~ ~ ~ k 'k,J e ~ • ~~t ~1 ~ .i'~; ~ ~ ~ ~ - d~:,, ~,.e
y
:.44,
' - T * 9 ~na. ~
. i. u
♦ i' t }
#ci rl rr ..,7~' r,~ r' f~ s .•,y .~'1ef.an ~ 7 r.',
s . v7 ~ . r' yt '~'~~~':',''"`f> ✓ adc.'~ ; ~ ~ . _ 4 : ~ ~1 _ ~ : • .
4 ~
/
•i~~~~~,ri~f}'Sr c~ w '
~A~,y~
U . iTra_ ' ' >.y~ '~f~ ~ r•'.J~. ',t~ ~'~T 5 ~ r.'3 J l'. 3~y~' 'f.y: • . . .
~t ~l.
~►~j~iv s+~'~. aG. i ~ 'ZA d
~ r . i+ K1 i, . ~ '~1~"i .~•y r ' ' 1
7 i 1r' •
K : `F~~'' Lif', . . ~ ~ _ _
4 foot black vinyl
$13 per lineal feet plus $1,100 for gates
Cost for '/2 acre site =$13,190 installed
` . .
~ J
i.
.
•.'.;:F-.
• }'c.
ia..-
1:
-
ti `r 1A~.. ~ L t
~•aI` ~ J``~ ~ ~A -
~ ~ ' y,~r~'`,~ i~z•
I - - ~ - - _ _ :,ri~7 •
4 foot galvanized chain link
$11 per lineal feet plus $900 for gates
Cost for'/z acre site =$11,000 installed
t ^ ~ ~
~r • , , ~ } ' ~ ` , ' ` ~ ~ w.~~ ;
e
. . .
~
. ~
yn .
. .k ~..Ir_.. ..~:a ~ ,
~ ~ " " ' . el .~L~:~. i?'.• .,,$7. ~ , '
Y.. ~
~
J. • s.-,.<-'` - ~f~~ .r,-: ~ - h~~
_ r✓'~' . , . . , - ~ ; , _
~ . . . . 7i i~ ~ ~ - .5.." .;Lk_ .
l ~~-z 'Y~~'' T r~ ~ ' . ~
~.w.~_.• R :6'_.~_ ...iIt"'_.~.._ . _..r: . . .,__...t~ y:.._?~i[.`s!y'i.
Wood post with wire mesh
$10 per lineal feet plus $800 per gate
Cost for'/2 acre site =$10,100 installed
-~'~l.,•o~;-
~-.;s-
. ~ . .
1
- •i \ . I
~IR
i~ h{- J ~~4~G. ; s+~.K f"•_' . r.~ •f~ -~ji✓~~ 1 ~ij' 1
F~~~~x
~gi~ x
_ ` .
~ .
• ' ~ 4 ~ ~ ~~r V ~~1
i~.c~ ~~Y7' ~ ~ ~ ` ~~.r~ . 'C - y ~ ~ {1_~`+Y"4r- _ ~
T~
i ~
~ ! 'i~ ? 4t-~ t,,r ,,~r~ "'Iri" ~
~
.
~
~r ~ ..~'~e~ ~r:~' ~ 3: ~~~i..~+~~-~'°{ak~~~ ~ ,~a-~ y ~►3 ~^i,~S„~~~ ,F ~ :;r j ~ ::,,r,.~-.r. ~
~
I ~ L• i . " . df. . ~ ~ . . R vR 's~`t + ~S"' Y ~ +e,~c-.. :.t ~ ~ . _ _ ~ _ ~
T-bar posts and mesh fencing, metal gates
$5 per lineal feet plus $400 per gate structure
Cost for'/2 acre site =$5,450 installed