Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-02-1980115 00 Iq Iq 0 Q Q 1 1 AUBURN, WASHINGTON MONDAY _ JUNE 27 1980 The regular meeting of the City of Auburn Council convened at 8:00 p.m. in the City of Auburn Council Chambers. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS: Councilmembers Roegner, Kitchell, Craig, Larson, Hitchcock and Fl.echsig present. Councilmember Lea excused. STAFF: Mayor Stan Kersey; Jack Bereiter, City Attorney; Len Chapman, Parks and Recreation Director; Hank Farr, Acting Finance Director; Jim Gibson, Police Chief; Bill Herold, Personnel Director; John Holmes, Library Director; Coralee McConnehey, City Clerk; Pat Nevins, Public Works Director;'Ceorge Schuler Planning & Community Development Director; Will Spencer, Fire Chief; Bruce Thun, Airport Director. It was moved by F.lechsig, seconded by Kitchell, to approve the minutes of the May 19, 1980,I Council meeting as mailed. **(See Finance Committee Report, Page 9) MOTION CARRIED 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Kersey declared the public hearing open on the request of London Square Associate from Unclassified to R-2 (Single Family), R-4 (Multi -Family) and C-1 (Light Commercial.) a parcel of land 38 acres in,size located on Oravetz Road in the 1800-1900 blocsk. (Application 3-80) The Planning Commission recommends approval of this request with the staff recommendations to be provisions of this approval and that the environmental impact statement be prepared and resubmitted to the Planning Commission for further study, the provisions are as follows: (1) The request of a C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zoning should be denied and a maximum of five (5) acres to be zoned C-N (Neighborhood Shopping District). The C-N zone shall have a minimum set back of 100 feet from the south property line. This 100 feet shall be left in natural condition. In addition, the 50 foot set back prescribed by the C-N zone along Oravetz Road shall be left in a natural condition augmented by plantings (trees, shrubs) where necessary as determine by the Planning Department to provide a suitable screen. (2) The balance of the prop- erty to be zoned R-2 (Single Family) with a Conditional Use Permit to construct a maxim of six (6) living units per acre (approximately 200 units) in accordance with the site plan filed with the application and made a part of the application. Any modification of the site plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Community Development Committee of the City Council for their review and approval. (3) The owner shall construct their portion of Oravetz Road abutting the entire length of the site to the specificati of the City of Auburn Public Works Department. (4) That this zoning shall take effect upon approval of an Environmental Impact Statement which addresses the environmental concerns of a development of this nature and provides mitigating measures. If no work is performed on the project within a two year period after final approval of the zoning the use shall revert back to its original zoning of Unclassified. Tom Barghausen, Cavness Engineers, representing London Square Associates, stated the site plan before the Council was the result of working with the City of Auburn. He added he was available to answer any questions. Joe Could, 3191 53rd S.E., asked why an Environmental Impact Statement had been request] by the Planning Department and not completed before the request for rezone came before the Council. It was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Hitchcock, that the public hearing be closed. MOTION CARRIED Craig asked why this rezone was set up to become effective upon completion of the EIS. Schuler responded while the density was in conformance with a single family dwelling area the cluster configeration was different. He felt EIS would mitigate any problems on this type of concept. The EIS would have to be reviewed by the Council. Hitchcock asked if this was an open end situation or would the Council see it again. Schuler stated what they were trying to do was providing the developer the information the concept would be approved before he invested $20,000 to $25,000. on 116 RN. WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNE 2. 1 Roegner wondered if the Council was studying a concept or a rezone. Schuler said he hated to have people spend money on an EIS when rezone might be denied. Roegner suggested maybe Utility Committee should approve concept and also asked since surrounding area of this rezone was Unclassified if this rezone is a precedent. Schuler said each one would have to be considered by its own merits and there were considerable number of single family, conventional type development in the immediate area in various stages of development. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Kitchell, to refer this request back to the Planning and Utility Committees to review concept. Craig thought maybe the Council should approve the rezone contingent upon full Council review of the EIS in public hearing. Flechsig stated going to Committee would not do what we need to do for the applicant. He said he agreed with Schuler in that we owe it to the applicant to let him know as to whether we will approve a rezone and when the EIS is completed it must come before the Council. Larson expressed concern that bringing Environmental Impact Statements back to the Council would create a tremendous workload. He said he felt good about the recommenda- tions as they were as there were safeguards already in them. ROLL CALL VOTE: Councilmembers Roegner and Kitchell voted YES. Councilmembers Craig, Larson, Hitchcock and Flechsig voted NO. MOTION FAILED Schuler called the Council's attention to Item No. 4 which would require approval of the Environmental Impact Statement. It was moved by Hitchcock, seconded by Craig, to approve the request of London Square Associates for rezone from Unclassified to R-2, R-4 and C-1, Application 5-80, to ' include the recommendations of the Planning Commission with the addition to Item 4 modifying it to include review by the Planning and Community Development Committee and the full City Council through public hearing. ROIL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED B. Mayor Kersey declared the public hearing open on the requestof Friendship Baptist Church for a Conditional Use Permit on a parcel of land zoned R-3 (Duplex) in order to construct a 190 seat sanctuary located on the east side of "A" St. S.E. between 13th and 14th Streets S.E. (Application 7-80) The Planning Commission recommends approval of this request because the new sanctuary is an allowable use within the R-3 zoning classifica- tion with a Condit iondl Use Permit and the new construction would tend to upgrade the entire area. And that the recommendations of the Public Works Department be made a part of this approval. Dale Andrews, 1312 "A" St. S.E., Pastor of the Friendship Baptist Church, stated the church would like to remain in the same location and this request was to expand this location. He ,asked approval because it would enhance the neighborhood and help serve the needs of the community. It was moved by Larson, seconded by Hitchcock, to close the public hearing. w MOTION CARRIED Flechsig asked who would pay for the fire hydrant mentioned in the engineer's comments. Schuler responded the property owner is responsible as part of the requirements of a building permit. Larson wondered if the alley vacation request heard at the last Council meeting didn't go through if this request would be moot. Roegner indicated the property is on another part of the property so this was a separate issue. -2- 117 AUBURN WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNE 2, 1980 Hitchcock asked for further clarification. Schuler responded if the alley vacation was not approved they would just have to redesign the parking lot. C 1 1 it was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Hithcock, to approve the request of Friendship Baptist Church for a Conditional. Use Permit on a parcel. of land zoned R-3 to construct a 190 seat sanctuary, Application 7-80, to include the recommendations of the Planning Commission and engineer's comments and, further, to instruct the City Attorney to draw up the necessary ordinance. ROLI. CALL VOTE: All. Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED Mayor Kersey declared the public hearing open on the request of. Bert Robison Construction Co. to rezone from Unclassified to C-4 (Wholesale Commercial) a parcel of land 2.05 acres in size lying at the southeast corner of 52nd and "G" St. N.E. also known as S. 277th Street. (Application 8-80) The Planning Commission recommends approval of the C-4 zoning with a contract zone and a time limitation of 5 years which would be subject to review by the Planning Commission. Also which would restrict the use to that of a contractor's storage yard prohibiting the construction of any permanent structures without Council approval and which would revert back to its original zoning if no longer used for storage yard purposes and if upon a transfer of ownership the zonin would become void. The Public Works comments are also to be made a condition of this approval.. Bob Smythe, attorney representing the petitioner, 29 1st St. N.E. spoke in favor of the request. Smythe noted this request came before the Council a year ago as a request for a C-3 zone which was denied because it did not conform to the present Comprehensive Land Use Plan and because if a C-3 zone had been permitted the owner could put any use on the land within the C-3 zoning requirements. He stated the reason they were coming before the Council with a C-4 rezone request was because a C-4 classification specifically permits storage uses. He added the petitioner was willing to contract with the City that this land would be used for only storage, fire protection would be provided, that if use should cease the land would revert back to original land use or Comprehensive Land Use Plan in effect. They also felt residential use of this particular area would not be possible at the present time with a drive in theater of which screens directly facing this area were showing Rated X and R movies. Smythe also noted no structures were to be put on the property so no sewer requirements would be needed, however, they would be willing to follow whatever City requires. Also, the use would be reviewed on a five-year basis and screening would be provided and the area landscaped. Don Wensley, owner of property directly east of the property in question, stated he supported the development with a couple of requests. He asked there be reasonable screening to hide storage yard. h Jim Hudson, Wembley Enterprises, stated restrictions placed on Wembley Enteprises to provide a buffer between Kent and Auburn should be placed on all properties which lie south of S. 277th. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Kitchell, to closed the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED Hitchcock asked Smythe regarding Item No. 3 of the engineer's comments regarding the street section not being strong enough to support heavy equipment. Hitchcock wanted to know who would pay for the street should it break down. Smythe responded he thou. since it was a city street the city would pay for it. Mark Robison, Robison Construction, 1621 S. Central, Kent, added it would not be used for business just dry storage. " Hitchcock asked Bereiter his opinion. Bereiter responded Mr. Smythe correctly stated it is a City street and the city would be responsible to keep it up. Hitchcock wondered if care of the road could be written into the contract. Flechsig asked Mr. Robison what kind of materials would be stored. Robison responded steel pipe, pump saws, van trailers full of intrigated equipment, dry storage items. Flechsig also asked the height of the fence they proposed. Robison replied 6 feet. -3- 118 AUBURN. WASHINGCON fyliPI17s1`7 2. 1980. Craig asked if fire flow was required if no structure was buil.t. He expressed hesitancy In taking on an area which has fire flow problems for commercial development. Mayor Kersey asked Chief Spencer if there was fire flow requirements for no structure. Spencer indicated fire flow requirements only speaks to structure. Dry storage would create no problem unless it was something like a stack of lumber. Larson wondered if restriction could be placed that no structures could be constructed. Hitchcock questioned Item 4 of the engineer's comments regarding storm drainage to the area. Smythe responded in talking with Schuler it was their understanding this item would have to be approved before development could take place. Hitchcock asked Pat Nevins about his opinion of Item No. 3. Nevins replied it is probably true this development could mean the road would break down quicker. He added some additional development in the area could bring improvements. sooner though. Flechsig asked Schuler the questions Hudson raised regarding S. 277th St. in regards to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Schuler stated they have been opposed to the zoning because it did not meet the Comprehensive Plan though they are not thoroughly opposed the contract zoning but there have to be certain safeguards. Be noted two additional items he feels should be added as conditions which he outlined in his memo of May 22, 1980, asking for (1) a 6 foot high screen fence shall be constructed around the site with proper set backs to provide site distance and (2) Public improvements shall be installed as required by the Public Works and Fire Departments. Craig noted he recalled the last time this request was turned down because the Citizen's Land Use Committee was coming with recommendations on density as a buffer zone to the residential area. He stated he felt the same was true tonight plus some unanswered engineering questions. He suggested the request should be held in abeyance until the Council has heard the recommendations from the Citizen's Land Use Committee. Roegner asked Pat Nevins when will S. 277th be going to four lanes. Nevins replied it depended on additional development in area. It was moved by Larson, seconded by Flechsig, to approve the request of Bert Robison Construction Co. to rezone from Unclassified to C-4, Application 8-80, with the recommendations of the Planning Commission Nos. 1 through 5 and the Planning Director's additional recommendations Nos. 1 and 2 and the Engineer's recommendations of April 21, 1980, and the City Attorney be instructed to draw up the necessary ordinance. ROLL CALL VOTE: Councilmembers Larson, Hitchcock, Flechsig and Kitchell voted YES. Councilmembers Roegner and Craig voted NO. MOTION CARRIED 1 1 D. Mayor Kersey declared the public hearing open on the request of Robert Lloyd for an extension of an existing Special Property Use Permit for the removal of sand and gravel on a parcel of land 40 acres in size located on the west hill adjacent to 60th Ave. South. (Application 9-80) The Planning Commission recommends approval of this request for a five (5) year extension of the existing permit granted under City Ordinance No. 2881 and that the conditions outlined within Ordinance No. 2881 together with a requirement that a storm water retention plan be prepared for approval by the Auburn Public Works Department be incorporated into the new permit and that the Master Plan be submitted within a 1 year period of time. Tom Barghausen, Cavness, representing Robert Lloyd, stated Mr. Lloyd was requesting a five-year extention of his existing permit under the Shepard Ordinance No. 2881 granted in 1975. Barghausen stated Mr. Lloyd acquired the property approximately three years ago and has been working to comply with the scope of Ordinance No. 2881 in the restorat' of the property. At present 400,000 yards of material is taken off the site per year. Cavness has done a rough estimate on the amount of material remaining at the end of the existing permit and figure approximately 800,000 to a million yards will remain. He added aerial photographs indicate about 90% of the upper plateau and 80% of the lower plateau remain to be done. Barghausen stated Mr. Lloyd is working with the Street Committee on the Master Site plan for reclamation of the property and will be working with several Council Committees in the future. -4- 119 AUBURN, WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNI, 2, 1980 'red Nickson, 523 Aaby Dr.., stated the Planning Commission minutes of five years ago indicate there were 110,000 yards to remove on Site No. 1 and 310,000 yards on Site No. 2 or a total. of. 420,000 cubic yards. They were now being told 800,000 to a million left:. Ile also wondered what the minor deviations are. He asked how the removal can be less than half done with more than twice the material left. He also expressed concern over the master plan wondering if in another five years there will be two million yards left. He asked if they had any control over it. Larry Nugent stated he wanted to speak about some of the slight deviations. One is they use his back yard as access to Federal Way. Hauling was done every day from dawn to dark. 1 Paul Stephens, 5671 S. 318th, questioned the hours and why was it not been adhered to. Barghausen noted the permit says the hours are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. six days a week. He noted Mr. Lloyd had testified at the Planning Commission hearing that helhad operated during the hours permitted. co Stephens said it was not true. He lives on the street and he knows the trucks go by on Sunday morning at 8 o'clock. And, they operate after 5 o'clock on Sunday. Iq Nugent said Lloyd is bringing in material during the evenings around 7 or 8 p.m. and sellsit on Saturday. He thinks they are running two or three businesses on the a property. Q It was moved by Hitchcock, seconded by Roegner, to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED Roegner asked Schuler about the hours and excavation. Schuler responded the hours I are 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. six days a week. It has not been checked on Sundays because there have not been any complaints. There has been control over the trucking because ' people at the school kept them informed.He stated the original permit was for two plateaus. Aerials indicate approximately 106,000 cubic yards from the lower plateau and approximately 800,000 cubic yards to be taken from the upper plateau. The plan is for it to be graded out for residential use and to leave it as it is would leave it in an unsitely condition. He said they recommend it be completed. Also, by working both of these pieces eventually it would provide a road to the floor of the valley Reogner asked about materials being brought in. Schuler stated he was not aware they were bringing materials in. Larson asked if they were permitted to bring topsoil in. Schuler said the permit allowed them to sell products from the crushing operation but not top soil unless it'was on the property to begin with. Flechsig asked if the crusher and stockpiling of material actually was on the site. stated the crusher is actually on the standard mining site and that permit is granted as a standard mining permit. This permit is for the two separate parcels on the separate piece. Craig stated he felt this was an example of poor ;management and that eight years ago he was on the other side of the podium and heard the same arguments. He added in the three or four years the operation was dormant,nature took over and took care of some of the unslightlyness. He recalled two years ago Mr. Lloyd promised a revised grading plan and up to six months ago still had not done it. Craig recommended not extending the permit until the whole thing is before the Council. Hitchcock noted Lloyd had come up with a site plan presented to t6 Street Committee. It had been sent back for further work. Roegner clarified it had been reviewed by the Street Committee and it had been sent to the Planning Committee. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Craig, to table the request of Robert Lloyd until the first Council meeting in .July. MOTION CARRIED bZ 120 AUBURN, WASHINGTON MONDAY _ JUNE 22_1980 E. Mayor Kersey declared Lhe public hearing open on the request of .lohn Wadkins to rezone From R-2 (single Family) to R-4 (Multi -Family) a pnrcel of Innd approxlmnLvly 10,460 sq. ft. In size on 1110 north side of 21st St. s.R, npproxlmaLcly 340 foot west of "R" St. S.R. (Appll('nLfoil 10-80) 11 Planning Commisssion rcconunvndS approval of lhv R-4 (Mu1tl-Family) zoning request and that consideratLoo Should by given to any rvgnlrv- ments of the Public Works Department. Tom Woody, Person & Person Homes, who are the new soon -to -be owner of the Iillside lanes which is north of the subject property and also contractor involved in building the four-plex going on this property, stated they are supportive of the Planning Commission recommendations. Zane Johnson, attorney, assured the Council that this was part of transfer of the Hillside Bowling alley and that Person and Person is going to construct the four plex. He added this would be the last unimproved lot that will be in that area and just east of it is a nine-plex which is not a great deal larger than the subject property. It also falls well within the City ordinance for four-plex square footage. He noted just northeast of this a C-3 zoning and southeast is the parking lot where they park their garbage trucks. It was moved by Hitchcock, seconded by Larson, to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED Larson asked Schuler for clarification of the Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the R-4 and the Planning Department recommendation of. a R-3 in would itl accomplish the same thing. Schuler responded no. Hitchcock /wshyefhe Planning Department recommended a R-3. Schuler stated they felt it would provide a better transition than an R-4 zone. Hitchcock asked what the property is adjacent to it to the east. Schuler responded a Commercial zoning with a Special Use Permit. Hitchcock stated he felt the two story would match the area better and also shield the area behind it. ' It was moved by Larson, seconded by Hitchcock, to approve the request of John Wadkins to rezone from R-2 to R-4, Application 10-80, to include the recommendations of. the Planning Commission and Public Works and the City Attorney be instructed to draw up the necessary ordinance. ROLL. CALL VOTE: All. Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED F. Mayor Kersey declared the public hearing open on changes in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as proposed by the Citizens' Land Use Advisory Committee. The following Items 1 through 12 are recommendations as proposed by the Citizens' Land Use Advisory Committee with the Planning Commission's decision following each item. (1) Change from single family to single family Uth one living unit per 5 acres. It was the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny this recommendation. (2) Provide a 200 foot set back off the Green River. It was the Planning Commission's recommendation that the setback be limited to 100 feet of the Green River instead of 200 feet. (3) Existing commercial along east side of Auburn Way North between 30th St. N.E. and north City limits restricting to depth of 300 feet and allow for a multi -family transi- tional zone of approximately the same depth between the commercial and single family residential classification. The Planning Commission's recommendation was approval of this proposal. (4) Eliminate multi -family strip parallel to 37th St. N.E. extended east. The Planning Commission's recommendation was approval of this proposal. (5) Change from multi -family to single family all the existing designated multi -family uses between Hemlock ST. S.E. and our easterly City limits on both sides of Auburn Way South. The Planning Commission's recommendation was approval of this proposal with the provision that the west boundary is moved easterly to the north line of Section 28, Twp 21 N, R 5 EWM. (6) Change from commercial to single family the commercial area on Auburn Way South located at the west side of the Auburn Academy. The Planning Commission's recommendation was denial of this proposal. (7) Change from single family to single family low density of 1. unit per acre, the area along the east boundary of the City lying north of 368th St. lying hetweenl44th and 148th Ave. S.E. The Planning Commission's recommendation was denial of this proposal. (8) 200 foot setback along the Stuck River. The Planning Commission has no recommendation on this proposal because of the inconsistent run of the Stuck River. (9) Designate blue heron rookery and marsh located in the southwest quadrant of the West Valley Highway and SR 18 as open space of wildlife refuge. The Planning Commission's recommendation 121 AUBURN WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNE 2,.1980 was approval of this proposal. (10) Chaange multi -family use to single family south of the Stuck River. The Planning Commission's recommendation was denial of this proposal. (11) Change all commercial zoning on the south side of the Stuck River to single family. The Planning Commission's recommendation was denial of the proposal. (12) Adopt Mill Creek Corridor Plan. The Planning Commission's recommendation was approval. of the concept of the Mill Creek Corridor Plan but no recommendation as to its size and location. Mike Reynolds, 29 1st St. N.E., Chairman of the Citizens' Land Use Advisory Committee, reviewed the Land Use Committee Recommendations made to the Council explaining the reasoning behind each item. N Joe Gould, 3191 53rd St. S.E., representing 22 families in the Southeast Citizens Association, addressed the elimination of multi -family areas on the other side of the Stuck River and change of commercial to single family. He stated they hoped the Council would go along with the Citizens' Advisory Committee recommendations on these. He said the Stuck River provided a natural boundary and the growth of multi -family and higher density developments is starting to come across the river. He added they would like to see a lower density than the Citizens' Advisory Committee recommended but they 00 would like the single family remain. Iq Don Wensley, Wembley Enterprises, spoke to Items No. 1 and 2 of the Land Use Committee recommendations. He stated to fully service a five -acre piece of land no one could afford it. Wensley felt the concept of high rise down to farm land has been a curse Q of every major community in the United States and Canada. It has created every congesti Q problem, every traffic problem and every servicing problem you could imagine because everyone has to go to the one central core to go to work. He also expressed concern because the rights of ownership which citizens' should be able to depend on. He illustrated it in his case when they brought the 152 acres along the Green River it was designated for four to six units per acre. He said they relied on that designation and in fact the only reason they bought the property. Wensley stated there was 150 feet along the Green River owned by King County they relied on to be the buffer. The five -acre proposal has two major propblems, according to Wensley, (1) they won't ' pert and (2) cost of full service would be prohibitive. He stated there was a need for a buffer between single family and the commercial aspect like the theater on the west and 277th on the north. He asked what was meant by the 200 foot setback on the Green River? Does it mean no private development within the 200 feet? Or, is it a restriction on the construction of buildings within 200 feet? Schuler responded it was both ways. It would depend on the type of development. It would have to be considered at the time of development. Wensley expressed 'concern if the Citizens' Land Use Committee knew what they were asking for. Schuler stated this would fall under the Shoreline Management Act which gives the City the opportunity to restrict any type of development. Wensley stated taking another 50 feet would be a large amount considering the total river frontage they own. Mayor Kersey noted the testimony of Reynolds, Gould and Wensley were the only people who would be unable to attend a possible continued meeting next Monday. It was moved by Craig, seconded by Hitchcock, to continue the public hearing on proposed changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan until next Monday, June 9, 1980, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. MOTION CARRIED BID OPENINGS A. Bids were opend May 21, 1980, 11:00 a.m., for 1980 Street Striping contract. Only one bid was received from Kaspac Corp. in the amount of $7,179.48. The Department of Public Works recommended award of the bid to Kaspac Corp. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Flechsig, to award the 1980 Street Striping Contract to Kaspac Corp. for their bid of $7,179.48. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED B. Bids were opened May 21, 1980, 11:00 a.m., for the 1980 Dust Oiling Contract. The following bids were received: 4 City Transfer of Kent, Inc. $8,047.16 Woodworth & Co. 9,510.28 Doolittle Const. 8,595.83 -7- 122 AUBURN WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNE 2 1980 The Department of Public Works recommendskaward of the bid to City Transfer of Kent, Inc. on their low bid of $8,047.16. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Hitchcock, to award the 1980 Dust Oiling Contract to City Transfer of Kent, Inc. on their low bid of $8,047.16. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED C. Bids were opened May 29, 1980, 11:00 a.m. for three hangar doors and associated hardware. Only one bid was received from Kapowsin Air Sports, Inc. in the amount of $1,250.00. It was moved by Larson, seconded by Hitchcock, to award the bid on the three hangar doors and associated hardware to Kapowsin Air Sports, Inc. for their bid of $1,250.00 ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmember voted YES MOTION CARRIED CONSENT AGENDA Authority to call for hearing before Council on July 7, 1980: A. Request for authority to hold public hearing on LID 295 (waterline portion of Auburn Way North construction) final assessment roll on July 7, 1980. Miscellaneous Recommendation: B. Request for authority for Pat Nevins to attend the A.P.W.A. Congress and Equipment Show in Kansas City from September 12 to September 18, 1980, to include all expenses and salary. MOTION CARRIED RECOMMENDATIONS A. It was moved by Craig, seconded by Larson, that Change Order No. 1, Contract 79-18, Water Imp. 124, Booster Pump Station, increase in the amount of $1,726.21 adding cement - mortar lining to steel headers, increasing life expectancy of header be approved. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED B. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Hitchcock, Pay Estimate No. 1 to Frank Coluccio Const. Co., Contract 79-10, "A" Street S.E., St. Imp. 165, in the amount of $388,563.38 be approved. Contract Bid Amount $3,029,835.00 Earned to Date 414,521.53 (Incl. $25,958.15 retainage) ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED C. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Hitchcock, that Pay Estimate No. 9, Contract 79-12, to Robison Construction Co., St. Imp. 200, Auburn Way No., in the amount of $90,101.80 be approved. Contract Bid Amount $1,196,547.91 Earned to Date 983,117.71 (Incl. $53,684.74 retainage) ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED D. It was moved by Craig, seconded by Larson, to approve Pay Estimate No.. 1 to Pitardi Trucking Co., Inc., Contract 80-04, San. Sewer Imp. #46, various sewer line replace- ment program, in the amount of $14,380.29. Contract Bid Amount $103,866.61 Earned to Date 15,889.24 (Incl. $1,508.95 retainage) ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED E. It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Hitchcock, to approve Pay Estimate No. 7 to Valley Cement Const., Inc., Contract 79-09, St. Imp. 201, East Main St. from "N" to go 123 AUBURN WASHINGfON MONDAY JUNE,2, 1980 IF, to "R" Streets, in the amount of $4,441.58. Contract Bid Amount $286,683.30 Earned to.Date 279,470.14 (Intl. $18,835.40 retainage) ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED It was moved by Roegner, seconded by Hitchcock, to approve Pay Estimate No. 2 to Totem Electric, Contract 79-15, St. Imp. 174, three interesecti"ons, in the amount of $50,855.74. Contract Bid Amount $235,116.50 Earned to Date 88,604.56 (Intl. $8,860.46 retainage) ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED C. It was moved by Craig, seconded by Larson, to authorize the City of Auburn participation in the King Councy Solid Waste Plan in the amount of $815.03 when billed. 00 ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED 11 PROCLAMATIONS, APPOINTMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS qq (' Mayor Kersey noted he had proclamed the month of June as Burglarly Prevention Month and Q efforts would be made to better inform the public on methods to prevent burglaries. Q COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Public Safety Committee - Chairman Bob Roegner - Minutes are of public record. Planning S Beautification Committee - Chairman Lillian Kitchell - No report fility Committee - Chairman Ron Craig - Minutes are of public record rport Committee - Chairman Bud Larson - Minutes are of public record. Building Committee - Chairman Lewis Hitchcock - No report Finance Committee - Chairman Al Flechsig ** It was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Craig, to correction the minutes of the Finance Committee Minutes of the May 19, 1980, Council mintues, page four, first sentence, the words "and will be repaid over a ten year period," should be deleted. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED It was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Craig, to approve Claim Checks #6135 through 6337 in the amount of $964,965.93 and payroll checks #10153 through 10445 in the amount of $179,816.60. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED It was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Craig, to approve a half-time clerk for the Fire Department. MOTION CARRIED It was moved by Flechsig, seconded by Craig, to approve a loan from the Current Expense Fund to the Airport Operating Fund 435 in the amount of $10,000.00 effective May 31, 1980, at 8% interest. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED OLD BUSINESS Ordinance No. 3507 It was moved by Craig, seconded by Larson, that Ordinance No. 3507, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THAT CABLE TELEVISION CONDUITS SHALL BE LAID men 124 AUBURN, WASHINGTON MONDAY JUNE 2 P 1980 UNDERGROUND AT THE SAME TIME AS OTHER BASIC UTILITIES ARE INSTALLED TO SERVE EACH LIVABLE BUILDING SITE," be'introduced and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: All Councilmembers voted YES MOTION CARRIED There being no further business to come before the Council the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. to the continued public hearing to be held Monday, June 9, 1980, at 8:00 p.m. in the City of Auburn Council Chambers. 4 Stanley P Kersey, Mayor -10= �Zr2' W �C Coralee A. McCOnn ey, ity Clerk 1 1 1