HomeMy WebLinkAbout6385 ORDINANCE NO 6 3 8 5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
SECTION 14 03 010 AND 14 03 030 OF THE
AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO PROJECT
PERMIT DECISIONS AND ADDING A NEW
CHAPTER, CHAPTER 18 53 TO THE AUBURN CITY
CODE RELATING TO MASTER PLANS
WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn zoning
code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current
development needs and standards of the City; and
WHEREAS, upon the annexation of Lea Hill on January 1, 2008, Green
River Community College is within the city limits and the City realized that a
master plan process may benefit larger institutional uses to assist with long term
planning, and
WHEREAS, a master plan process allows for the long term planning or
phased developments for certain types of land uses such as larger institutional or
commercial uses where the phased development can be planned holistically; and
WHEREAS, a master plan process allows for early and frequent public
involvement; and
WHEREAS, following proper public notice, the Planning Commission
considered the master plan code amendments at a public hearing on September
7, 2011, and
WHEREAS, after fully considering the testimony and information
presented at the public hearing, on October 18, 2011, the Planning Commission
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3 2011
Page 1 of 12
made its recommendations for code amendments to the City of Auburn City
Council, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee
reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation at their November 14,
2011 meeting and forwarded their recommendation to the City Council at their
November 28, 2011 meeting, and
WHEREAS, the environmental review on the proposal has been
completed in accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) with a final Determination of Non-significance (DNS) issued August
9, 2011, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36 70A.106, the proposed zoning code
amendments were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-
day state review and acknowledgment received on August 16, 2011, and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code
amendments have been received from the Department of Commerce or other
state agencies, and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council find that the proposed amendments
provides a new process, through incentives, for larger institutional and
commercial uses to develop phased projects and engage in long term planning
efforts
Ordinance No 6385
November 3 2011
Page 2 of 12
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That section 14 03 010 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows
14.03 010 Type ! decisions.
Type I decisions are administrative decisions made by the city which are
not subject to environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) codified at Chapter 43 21C RCW Type I decisions include, but are not
limited to, the following project applications
A. Building permit;
B Plumbing permit;
C Mechanical permit;
D Utility permit;
E Special permit;
F Excavation permit;
G Land clearing permit;
H Grading permit;
I Floodplain development permit;
J Public facility extension agreement;
K. Right-of-way use permit;
L. Lot line adjustment;
M Home occupation permit;
N Temporary use permit (administrative),
0 Administrative use permit;
P Short subdivision (plat),
Q Mobile home closure plans
R. Extensions or minor amendment to an approved master plan (Ord
6295 § 1, 2010, Ord 5746 § 2, 2003, Ord 4835 § 1, 1996 )
Section 2. That section 14 03 030 of the Auburn City Code be and the
same hereby is amended to read as follows
14.03.030 Type III decisions.
Type III decisions are quasi-judicial final decisions made by the hearing
examiner following a recommendation by staff Type III decisions include, but are
not limited to, the following project applications
A. Temporary use permit;
B Substantial shoreline development permit;
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3 2011
Page 3 of 12
lf.r 4
C Variance,
D Special exceptions,
E. Special home occupation permit;
F Preliminary plat;
G Conditional use permit;
H Surface mining permit
I. Master Plan (Ord 6295 § 1, 2010, Ord 6184 § 3, 2008, Ord 4835 § 1,
1996 )
Section 3. That a new Chapter 18 53 of the Auburn City Code be and
the same hereby is created to read as follows
Chapter 18.53
Master Plans
Sections
18 53 010 Intent
18 53 020 Applicability
18 53 030 Approval Process and Effect of Approved Master Plan
18 53 040 Public Participation
18 53 050 Decision Criteria
18 53 060 Components of the Master Plan
18 53 070 Incentive Based Approach
18 53 080 Extensions
18 53 090 Revocations
18.53 010 Intent.
A. This Chapter establishes standards and criteria for the development of
a Master Plan The provisions of this Chapter are voluntary and incentive-based
B The master plan is intended to establish conditions with which all
concurrent and subsequent land use approvals implementing the master plan
shall comply The master plan process provides long term guidance for a large
area so that the continuity of the overall development is maintained The process
allows for development to occur in phases where coordination of public facilities
is needed, when a master plan is needed to determine how best to develop the
area, or when a master plan is needed to integrate various uses
C Use of a Master Plan is intended to recognize the valuable role played
by public facilities such as educational and religious institutions as well as large
scale commercial development providing the community with needed services
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3, 2011
Page 4 of 12
D This Chapter provides the vehicle for large-scale, multi-phased
developments by obtaining conceptual approval of several projects at one time
and coordinating future provisions of infrastructure capacity It allows the City to
plan for the extension/expansion of public infrastructure in a timely and efficient
manner
E The processes in this Chapter provide opportunities for adjacent
property owners, homeowner associations, and businesses to evaluate the
cumulative impacts associated with the full build out of large scale public facilities
and commercial developments They allow for public input on the design and
development standards of these projects to minimize impacts to adjacent
properties and protect the character of the surrounding areas They also ensure
that large scale public facilities and commercial developments are compatible
with community character and values
18.53 020 Applicability
A. Institutional Uses such as community colleges, religious institutions, or
public/private schools on properties 5 acres or greater may apply for a master
plan
B Commercial or mixed-use projects on properties 10 acres or greater
where the applicant plans a phased development over several years may apply
for a master plan
C Property included within the master plan shall be under the same
ownership or a signed agreement must establish control over multiple
ownerships
D A master plan application may be combined with other applications
such as a rezone or preliminary plat.
18.53.030 Approval Process and Effects of Approved Master Plan
A. The initial approval of a master plan shall be a Type III Decision as
provided for in ACC Section 14 03 030
B The master plan can be approved for a maximum ten years with a
review by the City at year five At year five, the City will review the following
1 Whether the phasing established under the original master plan still
meets the needs of the applicant.
2 Whether traffic substantially changed within the first five years of the
master plan to an extent that would warrant additional review and mitigation
C No later than six months prior to the end of the fifth year in the master
plan, the applicant shall conduct a neighborhood review meeting pursuant to
ACC 18 02 130
D The master plan, including any approved extension, vests as to the
uses and standards contained in the master plan for the period of approval
except for development regulations related to public health and safety issues,
including but not limited to building codes, fire codes, mechanical codes,
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3 2011
Page 5 of 12
plumbing codes, electrical codes, and property maintenance codes, which shall
vest upon the City's acceptance of a completed permit application for each
specific permit.
The City reserves the authority to impose new or different officially
adopted regulations if, and to the extent required by, a serious threat to the public
health and safety, as determined by the City The City also reserves the
authority to impose new or different officially adopted regulations, if federal or
state laws require new or different standards
E Subsequent project applications shall be consistent with the master
plan
F The master plan will be treated as a single site for purposes of
calculating impact fee credits per Section 19 04 060
18.53 040 Public Participation
A. The applicant shall conduct at a minimum one neighborhood meeting
as provided for in ACC Section 18 02 130 prior to the submittal of a master plan
application
B Public notification shall be provided in accordance with ACC Section
14 07 040, except that notices shall be mailed to property owners within 500 feet
of the project site
18.53 050 Decision Criteria
A. The proposed master plan shall be consistent with the Auburn
Comprehensive Plan
B The proposed master plan shall comply with all applicable city codes
If the proposal incorporates elements from the incentive-based approach outlined
in Section 18 53 060, development standards may be different from that of the
underlying zone
C There shall be sufficient capacity in the public transportation system to
support the development of all phases of the master plan either through existing
infrastructure, planned and programmed City improvements that are included in
the CIP to the transportation network (e g concurrency), and additional
improvements proposed in the master plan
D The master plan shall include provisions for the availability of public
services such as transportation, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, police,
fire, and transit.
E The master plan shall show how the proposal protects designated
resources such as significant trees and critical areas, if applicable, in compliance
with city code
F All potential off-site impacts such as noise, glare, and traffic shall be
identified and mitigated to the extent practicable to bring the project within
adopted City standards
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3, 2011
Page 6 of 12
G The proposed master plan shall be integrated with adjacent land uses
through site design, landscaping, parking/traffic management, and multi-modal
transportation elements that limit potential conflicts between the proposed use(s)
and adjacent uses
18.53 060 Components of the Master Plan
The applicant shall submit a master plan application with the following
components and meeting the requirements on the applicable checklist. The
review body (e g Hearing Examiner) may modify the proposal, particularly those
portions dealing with development standards and review procedures
A. The current and possible future boundaries, including the boundaries
of each phase, of the use for the duration of the master plan
B A narrative that addresses the following
1 The decision criteria outlined in ACC Section 18 53 050
2 Description of present uses, affiliated uses, proposed uses, and
possible future uses for the project boundaries
3 Description of present uses and affiliated uses for the adjacent
properties
4 If residential units are proposed then minimum and maximum floor
areas, densities, and number of units shall be identified
5 If office and/or commercial is proposed then minimum and maximum
floor area ratios shall be identified
C A conceptual site plan shall be submitted meeting the requirements of
the applicable checklist.
D A conceptual open space/recreation plan showing tree retention and
removal, recreation areas (if residential units are proposed,) and view corridors if
applicable
E Proposed standards that will control development of the possible future
uses that are in addition to or substitute for the requirements of the underlying
zone The proposed standards will need to include at a minimum
1 Height
2 Setbacks
3 Floor Area Ratio limits
4 Landscaping requirements
5 Parking requirements
6 Signage
7 View corridors
8 Facade treatments
9 Other architectural design controls
F Proposed development phases, probable sequence for proposed
developments, estimated dates, and interim uses of the property awaiting
development. The plan shall also address any proposed temporary uses or
locations of uses during construction periods
Ordinance No 6385
November 3, 2011
Page 7 of 12
G Information on the following items for each phase
1 Traffic impact analysis that add_resses the requirements outlined in the
City's Engineering Design Standards
2 Non-motorized plan showing pedestrian and bicycle connections
before, during, and after implementation of the master plan
3 Parking study that shows the projected peak parking demand, an
analysis of this demand compared to proposed on-site and off-site parking
supply, potential impacts to the on-street parking system if applicable, and
proposed mitigation measures
4 Circulation plan for all modes of transportation including the following
a The planned street system shall be compatible with the City's
Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Engineering Design Standards
Development that is proposed in areas of the City that have a planned
street system, which is a part of the comprehensive plan or the City's six-
year plan, and any other street plan, shall make provisions for such streets
and must not cause implementation of such street plans to become
unattainable
b Master Plans that are proposed in areas of the City that have planned
routes or facilities for bicycles, equestrian, or other non-motorized
transportation mode which are a part of the comprehensive plan or the
City's six-year plan, and any other street plan,,shall make provisions for
such routes and must not prevent implementation of such routes
c. When abutting vacant or underdeveloped land, new development shall
provide the opportunity for future connection to its interior pathway system
through the use of pathway stub-outs, building configuration, or parking lot
layout. The proposed location of future non-motorized and pedestrian
connections shall be reviewed in conjunction with applicable development
approval
d Developments shall include an integrated non-motorized circulation
system that connects buildings, open spaces, and parking areas with the
adjacent street sidewalk system
e Pedestrian connections to existing or proposed trails/pedestrian routes
on adjacent properties shall be provided unless there are physical
constraints such as sensitive areas that preclude the construction of a
pedestrian connection
5 The planned water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage systems
compatible with the City's Comprehensive Utility Plans and in conformance with
the City's engineering design standards The conceptual utility plans shall contain
sufficient information to demonstrate that the system layouts and methods of
service are feasible The City may also require additional design information
(e g a preliminary drainage analysis) prior to approving the conceptual plans
18.53.070 Incentive Based Approach
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3 2011
Page 8 of 12
Master plans are not a required process for large-scale developments.
However, master plans provide the vehicle for large-scale, multi-phased
developments to obtain conceptual approval of several projects at one time
coordinating future provisions of infrastructure, gather early public input, and
provide the applicant with a certain level of certainty for a multi-phased project.
The following table outlines incentives for establishing a master plan and can be
cumulative incentives
Table 18.53.070 1 Incentives
1' Complete a master plan • Expedited permit review
• Parking reductions
• Expedited reviews for tenants
2 Building(s) comply with the • One additional story beyond the
International Green Building Code 1 maximum height for the
underlying zone for 50 percent of
the buildings in the
development. The applicant
may also submit for a 50%
refund in the building plan review
and inspection fees once the
minimum certification is
achieved
3 Inclusion of accessible public open • Reduction in required
spaces/plazas and/or sustainable landscaping
landscaping approaches • Less inspection/reporting (if
possible)
4 At least 50 % of the off-street • One additional story beyond the
parking'for the development is maximum height for the
located in parking structures, some underlying zone for all buildings
or all of which may be above-grade in the development
as long as the parking garage does • Residential floor area of up to
not front a public street. If the 4 0 ratio
parking garage does front a public • Reduction in minimum parking
street, then the following standards standard
apply.
a Include ground level details
such as plinths for columns,
projecting window sills,
kickplates
b Upper levels screened
architecturally with at least
1 The International Green Building Code would need to be adopted by reference in Chapter 15.06
Ordinance No 6385
November 3, 2011
Page 9 of 12
[
5 Use of Low Impact Development • Increased lot coverage than
what is permitted in the
underlying zoning if open spaces
improved with swales,
permeable pavement.
18.53.080 Extensions and Modifications
A. An approved master plan may be extended beyond the ten years for a
maximum of five additional years provided
1 The applicant shall submit a complete extension request to the city for
review not later than one year prior to the ten year expiration date
2 The applicant shall demonstrate that the additional time frame is
needed to complete the phasing of the original approved master plan
3 The applicant shall demonstrate that there will not be any additional
impacts created by extending the time frame
B An approved master plan may be modified as follows
1 A minor amendment to an approved master plan may be applied for as
a miscellaneous administrative decision processed as a Type I decision pursuant
to ACC 14 03 010 A minor amendment is defined as not adding more than 20
percent to the gross square footage of the master plan Minor adjustments shall
be reviewed for consistency with this chapter and the regulations of this title, as
well as the following criteria
a The adjustment maintains the design intent or purpose of the original
approval, and
b The adjustment maintains the quality of design or product established by
the original approval, and
c. The adjustment does not cause a significant environmental or land use
impact on or beyond the site, and
d The adjustment is not precluded by the terms of this title or by state law
from being decided administratively; and
e Circumstances render it impractical, unfeasible, or detrimental to the
public interest to accomplish the subject condition or requirement of the
master plan approval
2 Major amendments are those that, when determined by the planning
director, substantially change the basic design, layout, open space or other
requirements of the plat. When the planning director determines a change
constitutes a major adjustment, a new application for a master plan is required
and shall be processed as a new and separate application
18.53.090 Revocations
A. The planning director or designee may revoke or suspend any permit
granted under this chapter if any of the following conditions is found to exist:
1 Fraud in obtaining the permit;
Ordinance No 6385
November 3 2011
Page 10 of 12
l I
2 Concealment or misrepresentation of any material fact on the
application or on any subsequent applications or reports,
3 The operation is found to be in violation of the approved plans,
conditions of approvals, or the terms of the permit and the owner has failed to
correct the violation after proper notice thereof
B The planning director's or designee's decision can be appealed
pursuant to Section 14 13 010 and 18 70 050
Section 4. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directions of this legislation
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable The invalidity of any clause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances
Section 6. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law
Ordinance No. 6385
November 3 2011
Page 11 of 12
NOV 21 2011
INTRODUCED
PASSED NOV 21 2011
APPROVED NOV 21 2011
.01ry• , A = . • N
2
PETER B LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
40,Q,.6.0_,..,k_
Danielle E Daskam, City Clerk
APP' •VEDA' is ORM
A �1
•�iel B Heid, i ' ' 'They
Published �(IV Z S t �t I
Ordinance No 6385
November 3 2011
Page 12 of 12