HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2011 Agenda Packet Planning and Community Development December 12, 2011 - 5:30 PM Annex Conference Room 2 AGENDA I.CALL TO ORDER A.Roll Call B.Announcements C.Agenda Modifications II.CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes - November 28, 2011* (Snyder) Minutes from the November 28, 2011 Planning and Com munity Development Committee Meeting. III.ACTION A. Resolution No. 4770* (Hankins) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aub urn, Washington, Approving the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program of the City of Auburn Pursuant to R.C.W. Chapter 35.77 of the Laws of the State of Wa shington B. Ordinance No. 6388 Off -street parking and loading* (Wagner) Request for Committee to move Ordinance No. 6388, A uburn City Code 18.52 to full City Council on December 19, 2011. C. Ordinance No. 6390 Outdoor Lighting Standards* (Wa gner) Request for Committee to move Ordinance No. 6390, A uburn City Code 18.55 to full City Council on December 19, 2011. D. Ordinance No. 6393 School Impact Fees* (Dixon) Request for Committee action to move Ordinance No. 6393, the proposed 2012 school impact fees for Auburn School District, Dier inger School District, Federal Way School District and Kent School District to ful l City Council on December 19, 2011. IV.DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Ordinance No. 6387 Landscaping and Screening* (Wag ner) Review comments provided by the Public Works Commit tee on the proposed amendments to Chapter 18.50. B. Ordinance No. 6389 Variances, Special Exceptions an d Administrative Appeals* (Wagner) Review comments provided by the Public Works Commit tee on the proposed amendments to Chapter 18.70.
C. Director's Report (Snyder) D. PCDC Status Matrix* (Snyder) V.ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov ), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are avai lable for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Minutes - November 28, 2011 Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Minutes - November 28, 2011 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:Staff recommends approval.Background Summary:Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:CA.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED CA.0
Planning and Community Development November 28, 2011 - 5:30 PM Annex Conference Room 2 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call Chair Lynn Norman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in Annex Conference Room 2 on the second floor of One Main Building, 1 East Main Stre et, Auburn, WA. Members present: Chair Lynn Norman, Vice Chair Nancy Backus and Member John Par tridge. Staff present : Mayor Pete Lewis, Planning and Development Department Director Kevin Snyder, Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, Pr incipal Planner Jeff Dixon, City Engineer Dennis Selle, Traffic Engineer Pablo Para, Governme nt Relations Manager Carolyn Robertson, Economic Development Manager Doug Lein, and Plannin g and Development Secretary Tina Kriss. Others present: Councilmembers elect Largo Wales, Wayne Osborne an d John Holman. Attorney for Segale Properties, LLC Jami Ba lint. B. Announcements Staff provided materials for items III.B. Ordinance No. 6394 and IV.D. Ordinance No. 6393 C. Agenda Modifications There were no agenda modifications. II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes - November 14, 2011 (Synder) Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Partridge seconded to Approve the November 14, 2011 minutes as written. Chair Norman concurred. Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0. III. ACTION A. Resolution No. 4769 (Dowdy) Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy request Committe e move Resolution No. 4769, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, setting the time and date for A Public Hearing before the C ity Council on the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program to full City Cou ncil. Member Backus moved and Member Partridge seconded t o forward Resolution Page 1 of 4 CA.0
No. 4769 to full City Council for review and approv al. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 3-0 B. Ordinance No. 6394 - 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendm ents (Chamberlain) Principal Planner Jeff Dixon provided the briefing on Ordinance No. 6394. Staff requests Committee move Ordinance No. 6394, Compreh ensive Plan Amendments to full City Council on December 5th, 20 11. Committee and staff discussed the recommendations of Planning Commissio n, Public Works Committee, and subsequent changes recommended by Pl anning and Community Development Committee. Committee and staff reviewe d the bike box pilot program recommendations and expressed a concern of limited data on bike boxes. Committee asks that staff include the bike b ox pilot program to the 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments allowing bike boxes a s an option, not a requirement. Member Backus moved and Member Partridge seconded t o forward Ordinance No. 6394 to full City Council for Consideration. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 3-0 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Resolution No. 4771 (Coleman) Government Relations Manager Carolyn Robertson revi ewed the various municipal functions, tasks and projects provided by Washington2 Advocates, LLC. Committee request staff add to the work plan t he objective that Boeing maintains their presence in the State of Washington , especially the production of the Boeing 737 MAX. B. 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (Dowd y) Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy and Traffic Engi neer Pablo Para presented the staff report. The Six-Year Transporta tion Improvement Program (TIP) is required to be amended annually as required by RCW 35.77.010. For Auburn, the primary importance of th e TIP is that, in most instances, projects must be included on the TIP to be eligible for state and federal grant programs. The TIP identifies secured or reasonably expected revenues and expenditures for each of the projects included in the TIP. Typically, projects listed in the first three years of the document are shown as having secured funding while projects in the las t three years can be partially or completely unfunded. Once the TIP is approved, projects are budgeted and funded through the City’s biennial budget. The TIP set priorities for the acquisition of project funding and is a prerequisite of most grant program s. Committee and staff Page 2 of 4 CA.0
reviewed the proposed amendments. C. 2011 Phase II Code Update - Grouping 1 (Chamberlai n) Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain provided the staff report on the Phase II Code Updates, Group 1. Ms. Chamberlain rev iewed the Planning Commission recommendations from its October 18, 201 1 public hearing. Committee provided the following recommend ations and feedback: Landscaping: Item B.1. Initial Maintenance period. Committee req uested the language be clarified. Staff will provide language consistent w ith the approved landscape plan to address code enforcement issues and make su re the long term maintenance section is also clear. Parking: Committee expressed concern whereby commercial park ing creeps into residential areas where residential and commercial are adjacent to one another. Outdoor Lighting: The Committee did not have any changes to the propo sed language but did inquire about special event lighting. Staff stated they would research the temporary use permit and sign code to see what the City’s regulations were related to special event lighting. D. Ordinance No. 6393 - School Impact Fees (Chamberla in) Principal Planner Jeff Dixon provided the briefing on Ordinance No. 6393. Title 19 (Impact Fees) of the Auburn City Cod e contains standards and regulations pertaining to the imposition of imp act fees in the City of Auburn. Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) addresse s the establishment, calculation, collection, and amendment of school im pact fees within the municipal boundaries of the City of Auburn. Four sc hool districts are within the City limits, Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, an d Kent school districts. Staff reviewed changes to the 2012 school impact fe es. Committee and staff reviewed the Dieringer School District school impact fee increase (letter). Committee recommended a specific timeline or cut off period be requested when schools submit a “request for increa se” to enable a reasonable time period for review. Committee suppor ts the Dieringer School District increase. E. Building Code and Land Use Code Issues for Business Use of Semi Truck Trailers (Snyder) Discuss potential building and land use code issues and options for use of semi-truck trailers by businesses for conduct of ce rtain business functions. Page 3 of 4 CA.0
Planning & Development Director Kevin Snyder review ed the staff report with Committee. The Planning and Development Department has recently been presented a policy issue that is not clearly addres sed in the City’s adopted building and land use codes. Specifically, this pol icy issue pertains to the use of semi-truck trailers by businesses for related busin ess functions. These functions can include situations where people and equipment a re placed within a semi truck trailer and are accessed and used by business emplo yees and customers. Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Auburn City Code contain the City’s building and construction regulations. The City of Auburn adopted the 2009 edition of the International Codes in 2010. The Building Of ficial has determined that semi truck trailers are not considered generally conside red a structure under the current definition and provisions of the adopted building c odes such that he could normally regulate issues affecting and addressing h uman occupancy of a constructed space. Address fire code issues, ingres s and egress, health and public safety. Committee is supportive in limiting the use to public facility and medical use. Staff will return to Committee with pr oposed code language. F. Director's Report (Snyder) Planning Director Snyder reviewed the progress of t he Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk construction and gateway design. G. PCDC Status Matrix (Snyder) Chair Norman asked Committee to review the matrix and address any questions to staff. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning and Community Development Committee, Chair Norman adjourned the m eeting at 7:32 p.m. APPROVED THIS ________ DAY OF _________________, 20 11. ______________________________ Lynn Norman - Chair ______________________________ Bobbie Hodgkinson - Planning Clerk Page 4 of 4 CA.0
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4770 Date: December 6, 2011 Department: Public Works Attachments: Memo Council Transportation Priority Matrix Resolution No. 4770 2012 -2017 Transportation Improvement Program Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:City Council to adopt Resolution No. 4770.Background Summary:Resolution No. 4770 adopting the revised and extend ed City of Auburn's 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Pursuant to RCW 35.77.010 the City of Auburn is req uired to annually prepare and adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (T IP) for each ensuing six calendar years. The TIP is the detailed programming document for transporta tion improvements over a six year period. The plan is intended to ensure that the City will have availabl e advance plans as a guide in carrying out a coordi nated street construction program. The City Council is required to conduct a public he aring to review the work accomplished under the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program, and to ado pt a revised and extended plan. Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember:Norman Staff:Hankins Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:ACT.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED ACT.A
PCDC Page 1 12/6/2011 Memorandum Engineering Division To: Planning & Community Development Committee (PCDC) Mayor Lewis From: Chris Hankins, Transportation Planner CC: Dennis Dowdy, Public Works Director Dennis Selle, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Assistant City Engineer Pablo Para, Traffic Engineer Michelle Surdez, Senior Accountant Rich Wagner, Public Works Committee Chair Date: December 6, 2011 Re: Final Draft - 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Update PURPOSE Review 2012-2017 Final Draft of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). BACKGROUND As of this date both the Planning & Community Devel opment Committee (PCDC), and the Public Works Committee (PWC) have reviewed the draft 2012-2017 TIP. Comments received at the November 28, 2011 PCDC mee ting regarding the Council Priority Matrix have been corrected and the updated matrix i s included in the attached materials. The PWC reviewed the TIP on December 5, 2011 and re quested changes to TIP#8 asking for pre design funds to be added to the year 2015. Additio nally, TIP#12 asking for pre design funds to be added to the year 2015. Further, it was request ed that a new category under Grant Status on the summary matrix be added to show Will Apply (WA). Each of these changes have been incorporated into the TIP and are shown in the atta ched materials. NEXT STEPS Staff will commence the TIP amendment process based on the below schedule. The final approved TIP document will be sent to WSDOT and PSR C for their acceptance. Dec 12 th , 2011 – PCDC: review final draft and recommend app roval of resolution for TIP adoption by City Council. Dec. 19 th , 2011 – PWC: review final draft. Dec 19 th , 2011 – City Council: Public Hearing & Adoption. Dec 20 th , 2011 – File Approved TIP with WSDOT & PSRC Attachments: • Final Draft 2012 – 2017 Transportation Improvement Program • Council Transportation Program Priority Projects M atrix (from Council Retreat) ACT.A
Council Operations Committee (COC) Planning for the May 12th, 2011 City Council Retreat Auburn Major Transportation Investments, 2011 - 2031 Council Prioritization Scoring (Edited with Final Scores)% Weighted Criteria; give "Grade Point Average" score COC DISCUSSION DRAFT 20%10%25%15%15%5%5%25%10%line ref TIP #Item Descriptions Capital Projects, Preservation and Operations City Future Cost City Cost per yr Project Total Cost Score weighted Included Cost of Utilities Cumulative Grant or Additional Funds Required Cumulative City Funds Required 164,65,66 Lea Hill Road & Bridge (Pike to 124th SE)$7,400,000$740,000$37,000,000 4424432 3.50 $7,500,000 $29,600,000$7,400,000 254 Kersey Way (Oravetz Road to So. City Limits)$800,000$80,000$4,000,000 2123432 3.45 $0 $32,800,000$8,200,000 314 West Valley Highway (SR 18 to W. Main)$2,000,000$200,000$5,000,000 3322444 3.40 $1,200,000 $36,000,000$8,203,000 45 M Street SE Underpass (E. Main to AWS)$5,000,000$500,000$22,400,000 1433444 3.30 $3,000,000 $53,400,000$10,203,000 520 M Street SE & AWS Intersection $400,000$40,000$2,000,000 4422432 3.15 $250,000 $55,000,000$15,203,000 611,60 M Street Corridor (4th NE to AWS)$1,560,000$156,000$7,800,000 3433432 3.10 $1,000,000 $61,240,000$15,603,000 714 West Valley Highway (W. Main to 15th NW)$1,600,000$160,000$8,000,000 2322442 3.10 $1,500,000 $67,640,000$17,163,000 886 Lakeland/Tapps Connector (Stewart, Bridge)$1,000,000$100,000$32,300,000 1433422 3.10 $0 $98,940,000$18,163,000 92,58 Auburn Way So. (Dogwood to Hemlock)$0$0$3,900,000 4421324 3.00 $0 $102,840,000$18,163,000 10 West Valley Highway (37th to City Limits)$600,000$60,000$3,000,000 2324442 3.00 $500,000 $105,240,000$18,763,000 116 277th (AWN to Green River Bridge)$820,000$82,000$4,100,000 3442422 2.95 $500,000 $108,520,000$19,583,000 1239,40,41,42 Lea Hill SE 312th,124th, 320th Corridor $1,900,000$190,000$4,600,000 3423332 2.90 $800,000 $111,220,000$21,483,000 1334,50,51 Intersections and ITS $1,600,000$160,000$8,000,000 3330232 2.80 $0 $117,620,000$23,083,000 141 A St. NW Phase 1 (3rd NW to 14th NW )$2,300,000$230,000$11,500,000 0344104 2.70 $2,000,000 $126,820,000$25,383,000 1543 Auburn Way So. & Riverwalk Intersection $480,000$48,000$2,400,000 4412322 2.70 $0 $128,740,000$25,863,000 1610 F Street SE (4th SE to AWS)$240,000$24,000$1,200,000 2313142 2.50 $0 $129,700,000$26,103,000 1747 Environmental Park District $3,940,000$394,000$19,700,000 0141331 2.40 $5,000,000 $145,460,000$30,043,000 1832 Downtown Streets and Sidewallks $2,400,000$240,000$12,000,000 1141242 2.40 $2,000,000 $155,060,000$32,443,000 197 15th SW Reconstruction (C St. to UPRR)$680,000$68,000$3,400,000 2113332 2.30 $0 $157,780,000$33,123,000 20Various Non-Motorized (Bike, ped.,12 TIP projects total)$3,400,000$340,000$17,000,000 2110222 2.25 $0 $171,380,000$36,523,000 213 Auburn Way Corridor (4th NE to 4th SE)$800,000$80,000$4,000,000 2221331 2.15 $0 $174,580,000$37,323,000 224 "I" St. NE (Developer participation) (40th to 52nd)$1,160,000$116,000$5,800,000 0342312 2.00 $1,100,000 $179,220,000$38,123,000 2362 Auburn Way So. (SR 18 to M SE, streetscape)$800,000$80,000$4,000,000 2244101 1.90 $0 $182,420,000$38,923,000 2463 29th and "R" SE Intersection $620,000$62,000$3,100,000 2412212 1.90 $0 $184,900,000$39,723,000 2561 Auburn Way So. Bypass (SR 18 to SR164)$13,000,000$1,300,000$65,000,000 0423400 1.85 $0 $236,900,000$52,723,000 268 A St. NW Phase 2 (W. Main to 3rd NW)$540,000$54,000$2,700,000 1231111 1.70 $500,000 $239,060,000$65,723,000 27 CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL $55,040,000$5,504,000$293,900,000 $26,850,000$3,192,080,000$748,955,000 2837 SOS Local Street Preservation (20 yrs)$40,000,000$2,000,000$40,000,000 1212133 2.60 $3,000,000 N/A$67,723,000 2935,36 Arterial Street Preservation (20 yrs)$60,000,000$3,000,000$60,000,000 1134442 3.40 $10,000,000 N/A$70,723,000 30 Routine Street Maintenance (20 years)$40,000,000$2,000,000$40,000,000 3124243 3.30 $0 N/A$72,723,000 31N/A Engineering (20 yrs, 8 FTE, traffic)$20,000,000$1,000,000$20,000,000 4444444 4.00 $2,000,000 N/A$73,723,000 32 PRESERVATION & OPERATIONS TOTAL $160,000,000$8,000,000$160,000,000 $15,000,000 33 CAPITAL PLUS PRESERV. & OPS TOTAL $215,040,000$13,504,000$453,900,000 $41,850,000 Safety Congestion Economic Stimulus Freight Regional Connectivity Financial Feasibility Urgency &Condition * Critera score: 4 = high to 0 = low for each item Bond or LID cost / yr @ Criteria * Critera weight (out of total 100%)City capital match @ 20% ACT.A
Resolution No. 4770 December 19, 2011 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4770 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2012-2017 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO R.C.W. CHAPTER 35.77 OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City prepare and adopt a comprehensive Transportation Imp rovement Program (TIP) for the ensuing six years, but only after conducting a public hearing; and WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 2012-2017 T ransportation Improvement Program for the City of Auburn was held on December 19th, 2011 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of t he Auburn City Hall, pursuant to notice published in the legal newspaper of the City of Auburn on December 6, 2011; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUB URN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows : Section 1 . There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit “A,” the terms of which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully set forth, a designation of the streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be improved in the manner therein set forth during the year set for the improvement of such street or streets. Section 2 . That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is he reby directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department of Transportation for filing not more than thirty (3 0) days after the adoption of this Resolution. Section 3 . That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement su ch administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry ou t the directions of this legislation. ACT.A
Resolution No. 4770 December 19, 2011 Page 2 Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. DATED this ___ day of December, 2011 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: ______________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney ACT.A
T T r r a a n n s s p p o o r r t t a a t t i i o o n n I I m m p p r r o o v v e e m m e e n n t t P P r r o o g g r r a a m m 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 --2 2 0 0 1 1 7 7 ACT.A
ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program T T r r a a n n s s p p o o r r t t a a t t i i o o n n I I m m p p r r o o v v e e m m e e n n t t P P r r o o g g r r a a m m 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 --2 2 0 0 1 1 7 7 Approved by Auburn City Council December 19, 2011 City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 (253)-931-3010 www.auburnwa.gov ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program ii Cover Photos: Top right is 8 th St NE & R St NE Traffic Signal; bottom left is A ST NW Phase 1. ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 4770 iii RESOLUTION NO. 4770 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBU RN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2012-2017 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO R.C.W. CHAPTER 35.77 OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTO N WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City pre pare and adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Pr ogram (TIP) for the ensuing six years, but only after conducting a public hearing; and WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program for the City of Auburn was held on December 19, 2011 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant to notice published in the legal newspaper of the City of Auburn on November 28, 2011; and WHEREAS, said amendment to the 2012-2017 Transport ation Improvement Plan of the City of Auburn was approved by the City Council by motion duly made and carried in said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBU RN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows : Section 1 . There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhib it “A,” the terms of which are incorporated herewith by reference as tho ugh fully set forth, a designation of the streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be improved in the manner therein set forth during the year set for the improvement o f such street or streets. Section 2 . That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is h ereby directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department of Transportation for filing not more than thirty (30) days after the adoption o f this Resolution. Section 3 . That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the dir ections of this legislation. Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 4770 iv DATED this ___ day of December, 2011 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: ______________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program v Transportation Improvement Program 2012-2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................1 Projects & Financing Plan Summary.....................................................................................................3 Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary..................................................................................13 Roadway Improvement Projects...........................................................................................................15 A Street NW, Phase 1...........................................................................................................................15 AWS Ped Improvements Dogwood to Fir............................................................................................16 Auburn Way Corridor Imp....................................................................................................................17 I Street NE Corridor..............................................................................................................................18 M Street Grade Separation....................................................................................................................19 South 277th Street.................................................................................................................................20 15th Street SW Reconstruction.............................................................................................................21 A Street NW, Phase 2...........................................................................................................................22 D Street NW..........................................................................................................................................23 F Street SE............................................................................................................................................24 M Street NE..........................................................................................................................................25 BNSF Railyard Grade Crossing............................................................................................................26 West Valley Highway Imp....................................................................................................................27 8th Street NE Widening........................................................................................................................28 49th Street NE.......................................................................................................................................29 Traffic Calming Improvements.............................................................................................................30 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 3....................................................................................................31 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 1....................................................................................................32 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 2....................................................................................................33 SE 320th Street Corridor Imp...............................................................................................................34 Downtown Promenade Imp..................................................................................................................35 Downtown Pedestrian Lighting............................................................................................................36 AWS Corridor Improvements Fir to Hemlock.....................................................................................37 M ST SE Corridor.................................................................................................................................38 Auburn Way South Bypass...................................................................................................................39 Auburn Way South Streetscape............................................................................................................40 Lea Hill Rd Segment 1..........................................................................................................................41 Lea Hill Rd Segment 2..........................................................................................................................42 Lea Hill Rd Segment 3..........................................................................................................................43 Intersection Improvement Projects.......................................................................................................45 Harvey Rd. & 8th Street NE Imp..........................................................................................................45 8th Street NE & R ST NE (104 th Ave SE U-turn)................................................................................46 Auburn Way North & 1st Street NE.....................................................................................................47 Auburn Way South & M Street SE.......................................................................................................48 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program vi Table of Contents (cont.) C Street NW & West Main Street.........................................................................................................49 F Street SE & 4th Street SE..................................................................................................................50 Railroad Crossing Imp..........................................................................................................................51 Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Dr SE...............................................................................................52 29 th St SE & R St SE.............................................................................................................................53 Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Projects...........................................................55 Traffic Signal Improvements................................................................................................................55 ITS Dynamic Message Signs................................................................................................................56 East Valley HWY ITS Expansion.........................................................................................................57 Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects...............................................................................59 BNSF/ East Valley HWY Ped. Underpass...........................................................................................59 Academy Drive Class 1 Trail................................................................................................................60 Metro Shuttles.......................................................................................................................................61 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program................................................................................................62 Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Imp............................................................................................63 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements........................................................................................................64 A St NE Ped. Imp..................................................................................................................................65 Interurban Trailhead Imp......................................................................................................................66 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements.....................................................................................67 Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous Projects............................................................................69 Mohawk Plastics Site Mitigation..........................................................................................................69 41st Street SE & A St SE Access Study...............................................................................................70 S 277 th St Wetland Mitigation..............................................................................................................71 104th Ave SE & Green River Rd Study...............................................................................................72 Environmental Park Study....................................................................................................................73 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Study....................................................................................74 S 316th Bike and Ped Study..................................................................................................................75 Kersey Way SE Study...........................................................................................................................76 Mary Olson Farm Imp..........................................................................................................................77 Roadway Preservation Projects.............................................................................................................79 Annual Bridge Preservation Project......................................................................................................79 Annual Arterial Street Preservation......................................................................................................80 Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program....................................................................................................81 Local Street Imp. Program (SOS).........................................................................................................82 Project Summary Spreadsheet .…………………………….……………………………….Appendix A 2012-2017 TIP Project Map…..…………..………………………………………………….Appendix B ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Executive Summary & Introduction 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 6 -year plan (2012-2017) for transportation improvements that supports the City of Auburns curr ent and future growth. The TIP along with the Comprehensive Transportation plan serve as source d ocuments for the City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan which is a Comprehensive Plan element required by Washington’s Growth Management Act. The program may be revised at any time by a majority of the City Council after a public hearing. The 2012-2017 TIP recognizes approximately $217 million wort h of transportation improvements (including Non-Motorized and roadway preservation) over the next s ix years. INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the TIP is to identify priority tran sportation projects and assure that the city has advanced plans as a guide in carrying out a coordin ated transportation program. There are always more projects than available revenues. Therefore, a prim ary objective of the TIP is to integrate the two to produce a comprehensive, realistic program for the orderly development and maintenance of our street system. Projects are required to be included in the TIP in order to be eligible for state and federal grants. Grant funding for projects listed may not yet be secu red. Statutory Requirements Six Year Transportation Improvement Program - RCW 35.77.010 requires that each city prepare an d adopt a comprehensive transportation improvement pr ogram for the ensuing six calendar years consistent with its Comprehensive Transportation Pl an. This six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shall be filed with the Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) each year within 30 days of adoption. Projects of Regional Significance - RCW 35.77.010 also requires each city to specifi cally set forth those projects and programs of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation improvement program for that region. The 2012-2017 TIP includes nine pr ojects of regional significance: TIP Project Number Project Title TIP #1 A St NW, Phase 1 TIP #4 I St NE Corridor TIP #5 M Street Grade Separation TIP # 6 S 277 th St Widening TIP #14 West Valley Highway Improvements TIP #50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP #51 East Valley Highway ITS Expansion TIP #58 AWS Corridor Improvements TIP #61 Auburn Way South Bypass ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Executive Summary & Introduction 2 Methodology Annual updates of the TIP begins with developing a revenue forecast to provide a reasonable estimate o f funding available to accomplish the transportation improvement needs. Since the desire to construct transportation improvements typically exceeds the a vailable forecast revenue, it is necessary to estab lish some method of prioritizing the needs. Transportation needs are identified by examining th e latest information concerning level of service, safety and accident history, growth trends, traffic studies and the City’s adopted Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The likelihood of receiving fe deral or state grants for various improvements, community interests and values are also considered. All of these factors yield a prioritized list of transportation improvements. Projects are placed into one of the following categ ories; Roadway Improvements, Intersection Improvements, Signal & Intelligent Transportation S ystem Improvements, Non-Motorized & Transit Improvements, Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneo us projects and Roadway Preservation Projects. Each project is identified as a Capacity or Non-capac ity improvement and those that lay within the limit s of a defined Arterial LOS Corridor per with Table 2 -2 of the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan are identified accordingly. Detailed project costs and funding sources are iden tified and provided for each project listed in the proposed TIP. The prioritized list is then financia lly constrained in the first three years to reflect the financial projections to yield the six-year Transpo rtation Improvement Program. After completing all reviews and compiling the document staff makes fina l recommendations to the Planning and Community Development Committee and City Council fo r approval. ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 3 Projects & Financing Plan Summary 201220132014201520162017Total TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects 1 'A' Street NW, Phase 1 ($4.1 Million Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs1,687,500 25,000 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue18,500 - - 150,000 - - 168,500 Grants785,000 - - - - - 785,000 Traffic Impact Fees684,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 934,000 Other (Development)200,000 - - - - - 200,000 2Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood t o Fir ($50 K Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs106,500 784,300 - - - - 890,800 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue46,500 43,500 - - - - 90,000 Grants60,000 740,800 - - - - 800,800 Other Sources- - - - - - - 3Auburn Way Corridor Improvements (4th St NE to 4th St SE)Capital Costs- - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 110,000 600,000 710,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (Development)- - - - - - - 4 'I' Street NE Corridor ($12,000 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs259,300 - - - - 6,760,000 7,019,300 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue259,300 - - - - - 259,300 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000 5,760,000 5 'M' Street Grade Separation ($6,998,500 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs7,549,735 8,684,828 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants4,791,535 4,208,465 - - - - 9,000,000 REET2- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees661,400 - 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 1,143,400 Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - - PWTF Loan- 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963 Other (Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - - 3,346,200 6South 277th - Auburn Way North to Green River Brid ge ($19,000 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs150,000 - - - - 4,500,000 4,650,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (Development)- - - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 715th St SW Reconstruction Capital Costs- - - - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 75,000 500,000 575,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000 REET - - - - - - - 8 A Street NW, Phase 2 Capital Costs:- - - 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 REET - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (Developement)- - - - - - - ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 4 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)9D Street NW, 37th to 44th ($6 Million beyond 2017)Capital Costs- - - - - 300,000 300,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 250,000 250,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 50,000 50,000 10 F Street SE, 4th to AWS ($8,000 Expended Prior to 2 012)Capital Costs- - 250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000 REET - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 11M Street NE, E. Main to 4th Capital Costs- 50,000 275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - 225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000 Traffic Impact Fees- 50,000 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000 12 Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard ($31 Mill ion beyond 2017)Capital Costs- - - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 125,000 - - 125,000 Other (Development)- - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 14West Valley Hwy Improvements ($2,270,000 Expended Prior to 2011)Capital Costs5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Grants - - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 158th Street NE Widening (Pike Street to R Street N E)Capital Costs- - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 360,000800,000- - 1,160,000 REET - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 16 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street NE Capital Costs- - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET - - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds- - - - - - - Other (Development)- - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 33Traffic Calming Improvements Capital Costs200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - - Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 5 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)39 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3 Capital Costs- - - - 100,000 750,000 850,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 85,000 650,000 735,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 15,000 100,000 115,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 40 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1 Capital Costs50,000 150,000 1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000 Traffic Impact Fees50,000 25,000 185,000 - - - 260,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 41124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 Capital Costs- 30,000 150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 100,000 865,000 - - 965,000 Traffic Impact Fees- 30,000 50,000 135,000 - - 215,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 42 SE 320th St Corridor Improvements Capital Costs- - 30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 51,500 502,100 - 553,600 Traffic Impact Fees- - 30,000 8,500 77,900 - 116,400 Other Sources- - - - - - - 52 Downtown Promenade Improvements Capital Costs145,000 - - - - - 145,000 Funding Sources:Grants (Federal)55,100 - - - - - 55,100 REET1 - - - - - - - Other (GO Bonds)89,900 - - - - - 89,900 57Downtown Pedestrian Lighting Capital Costs39,500 - - - - - 39,500 Funding Sources:Grants (Federal)- - - - - - - REET1 - - - - - - - Other (GO Bonds)39,500 - - - - - 39,500 58Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements Fir to Hem lock($296,300 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs2,736,700 - - - - - 2,736,700 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants2,189,400 - - - - - 2,189,400 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (Muckleshoot)547,300 - - - - - 547,300 60 M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)Capital Costs- - - 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 234,000 234,000 - 468,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 397,800 3,247,800 - 3,645,600 Traffic Impact Fees- - - 1,263,600 1,263,600 - 2,527,200 REET2 - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - - - - ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 6 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)61Auburn Way South Bypass ($27,550,000 Expenditures Beyond 2017) Capital Costs- - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - - - - 62Auburn Way South Streetscape Improvements Capital Costs- - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 400,000 400,000 800,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 1,200,000 2,050,000 3,250,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - 350,000 350,000 700,000 64 Lea Hill Road Segment 1 (8th St NE from R St NE to 104th Ave SE)Capital Costs- - - - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 300,000 1,250,000 1,550,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 5,500,000 3,750,000 9,250,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 REET2 - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - 450,000 12,200,000 12,650,000 65 Lea Hill Segment 2 (104th Ave SE to 112th Ave SE )Capital Costs- - - - - 11,400,000 11,400,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,000,000 9,000,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,400,000 2,400,000 Other Sources - - - - - - - 66Lea Hill Segment 3 (SE 312th St from 112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE )Capital Costs- - - - - 3,575,000 3,575,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 250,000 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,100,000 2,100,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 700,000 700,000 REET2 - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - - 525,000 525,000 Subtotal, Roadway Improvement Projects :Capital Costs 12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue479,300 43,500 - 534,000 1,119,000 3,000,000 5,175,800 Grants7,881,035 5,074,265 2,450,000 5,239,300 11,543,600 89,150,000 121,338,200 Traffic Impact Fees1,395,400 130,000 600,500 2,277,600 1,502,000 4,645,500 10,551,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - - PWTF - 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963 REET2 - - - - - - Other (Muckleshoot Tribe)547,300 - - - - - 547,300 Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Other (Other Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - - 3,346,200 Other (GO Bonds)129,400 - - - - - 129,400 Other (Development)200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000 12,810,000 Other Sources- - - - 800,000 13,075,000 13,875,000 Total Funding12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 7 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Intersection Improvement Projects 17Harvey Road & 8th St NE Imp. (1,906,600 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs87,300 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees87,300 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 Other (Redlex)- - - - - - - 188th St NE & R ST NE Improvements (104th Ave SE U-turn) (50,000 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs332,000 - - - - - - Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue157,000 - - - - - - Grants (Federal)50,000 - - - - - - REET2 75,000 - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - Other (Redflex)50,000 - - - - - - 19Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improveme nts Capital Costs- 50,000 550,000 - - - 600,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- 50,000 125,000 - - - 175,000 Grants - - 425,000 - - - 425,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 20Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Imp rovements ($25,000 Expended Prior to 2011)Capital Costs75,000 1,000,000 - - - - 1,075,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue75,000 - - - - - 75,000 Grants - 850,000 - - - - 850,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees- 150,000 - - - - 150,000 21C Street NW and West Main Street Capital Costs- 100,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- 20,000 200,000 - - - 220,000 Grants - 80,000 800,000 - - - 880,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 25 F St SE and 4th St SE Traffic Signal ($396,000 Expe nded Prior to 2012)Capital Costs1,000 - - - - - 1,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue1,000 - - - - - 1,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other Sources- - - - - - - ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Intersection Improvement Projects (Cont.)38Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements Capital Costs- - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000 Grants - - - 1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - 43 Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Intersection Improveme nts Capital Costs- - - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - 125,000 1,951,000 - 2,076,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - 25,000 299,000 - 324,000 6329th Street SE & R Street SE - Capital Costs- - - - - 2,945,000 2,945,000 Funding Sources:- - - - - - - Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants (State)- - - - - 2,325,000 2,325,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 620,000 620,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - Subtotal, Intersection Imp. Projects:Capital Costs495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue233,000 70,000 325,000 100,000 150,000 - 878,000 Grants 50,000 930,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 3,601,000 2,325,000 9,356,000 Traffic Impact Fees87,300 86,900 86,500 111,000 384,600 705,200 1,461,500 Traffic Mitigation Fees- 150,000 - - - - 150,000 REET2 75,000 - - - - - 75,000 Other (Redflex)50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Total Funding495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 9 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Traffic Signal and Intelligent Transportation Syste m (ITS) Projects 34Traffic Signal Improvements Capital Costs175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 Funding Sources:Urestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (REET 2)175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 50ITS Dynamic Message Signs ($880K beyond 2016)Capital Costs- - 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000 Grants - - 190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Other (REET2)- - - - - - - 51East Valley Highway ITS Expansion Capital Costs- 800,000 - - - - 800,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - 692,000 - - - - 692,000 Traffic Impact Fees- 108,000 - - - - 108,000 Other (REET2)- - - - - - - Subtotal, ITS Projects:Capital Costs175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue- - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000 Grants - 692,000 190,000 - 190,000 - 1,072,000 Traffic Impact Fees- 108,000 - - - - 108,000 REET2175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 Total Funding 175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 10 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 23BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass ($224 ,000 Expended Prior to 2012, $5 Million beyond 2017 )Capital Costs- - - - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - 4,550,000 4,550,000 Other (Other Agencies)- - - - - 250,000 250,000 24 Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail Capital Costs- - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000 Grants - - - - 382,500 382,500 765,000 Other - - - - - - - 26METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shu ttles Capital Costs220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 30 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program Capital Costs100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 31Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improv.Capital Costs100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 32Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other (REET2)- - - - - - - 44 A ST NE Pedestrian Improvements Capital Costs- - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 45Interurban Trailhead Improvements Capital Costs- - - 210,000 - - 210,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - 210,000 - - 210,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - 56 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements Capital Costs373,500 - - - - - 373,500 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants373,500 - - - - - 373,500 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Motorized & Transit Projects:Capital Costs 813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue420,000 320,000 420,000 370,000 462,500 362,500 2,355,000 Grants373,500 - - 360,000 382,500 4,932,500 6,048,500 Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 Other (Other Agencies)- - - - - 250,000 250,000 Total Funding 813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 11 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 13 Mohawk Plastics Site Wetland Mitigation ($656,000 E xpwnded Prior to 2012)Capital Costs25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 27 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management St udy Capital Costs2,000 - - - - - 2,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue2,000 - - - - - 2,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 29 So. 277th, Wetland Mitigation ($204,000 Expended Pr ior to 2012)Capital Costs25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 46104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study ($2,000 Exp ended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs3,000 - - - - - 3,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue3,000 - - - - - 3,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 47 Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study Capital Costs- - - - 5,000 - 5,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 5,000 - 5,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 48 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Stu dy ($2,000 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 49S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Study ($1,000 Expended Prior to 2012)Capital Costs5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 54 Kersey Way Study Capital Costs 200,000 - - 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 500,000 - - 500,000 Grants - - - 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 - - - - - 200,000 55 Mary Olson Farm Capital Costs 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue1,000 1,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - Subtotal, Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects:Capital Costs 271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue46,000 25,000 25,000 500,000 5,000 - 601,000 Grants - - - 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Traffic Impact Fees25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 Total Funding 271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 12 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total TIP#Roadway Preservation Projects 28 Annual Bridge Preservation Project Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 35 Annual Arterial Street Preservation Capital Costs 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Arterial Street Fund 1051,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 36 Annual Arterial Crackseal Program Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Arterial Street Fund 105200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 37 Local Street Preservation Program SOS Capital Costs 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 Subtotal, Preservation Projects:Capital Costs3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revenue50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Arterial Street Fund 1051,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 9,000,000 Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 Total Funding3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000 SUMMARY:CAPITAL COSTS Roadway Projects12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863 Intersection Projects495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500 Signal & ITS Projects175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000 NonMotorized Projects813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500 Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000 Preservation Projects3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000 Total Costs 18,234,035 16,231,028 9,322,000 18,841,900 26,640,200 131,875,700 221,144,863 FUNDING SOURCES:Unrestricted Street Revenue1,228,300 508,500 850,000 1,554,000 1,816,500 3,412,500 9,369,800 Traffic Impact Fees1,507,700 344,900 712,000 2,408,600 1,911,600 5,415,700 12,300,500 Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 150,000 - - - - 350,000 Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 Arterial Street Fund 1051,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 9,000,000 Grants8,304,535 6,696,265 3,865,000 9,974,300 15,717,100 96,407,500 140,964,700 Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 Other (REET2)250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,125,000 Other (GO Bonds)129,400 - - - - - 129,400 Other (Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - 250,000 3,596,200 Other (Development)200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000 12,810,000 Other (Muckleshoot)547,300 - - - - - 597,300 Other (Redflex)250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,250,000 Other Sources- - - - 800,000 13,075,000 13,875,000 PWTF - 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963 Total Funding 18,234,035 16,231,028 9,322,000 18,841,900 26,640,200 131,875,700 221,144,863 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 13 Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Unrestricted Street Revenue Beginning Fund Balance1,200,000 521,700 563,200 268,200 (730,800) (1,987,300) Annual Revenue550,000 550,000 555,000 555,000 560,000 560,000 Project Expenses1,228,300 508,500 850,000 1,554,000 1,816,500 3,412,500 End of Year Fund Balance521,700 563,200 268,200 (730,800) (1,987,300) (4,839,800) Traffic Impact Fees Beginning Fund Balance1,049,313 341,613 796,713 884,713 (723,887) (1,835,487) Annual Revenue800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 Project Expenses1,507,700 344,900 712,000 2,408,600 1,911,600 5,415,700 End of Year Fund Balance341,613 796,713 884,713 (723,887) (1,835,487) (6,451,187) Traffic Mitigation Fees Beginning Fund Balance362,100 162,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 Annual Revenue- - - - - - Project Expenses200,000 150,000 - - - - End of Year Fund Balance162,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 Local Street Fund 103 Beginning Fund Balance- - - - - - Annual Revenue2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Project Expenses2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 End of Year Fund Balance- - - - - - Arterial Street Fund 105 Beginning Fund Balance- - - - - - Annual Revenue1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Project Expenses1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 End of Year Fund Balance- - - - - - Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds Annual Budget20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 Project Expenses20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 Other (RedFlex in Fund 328)Annual Budget250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Project Expenses250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other (REET2)Annual Budget250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Project Expenses250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Grants Secured8,304,535 1,500,000 - - - - Unsecured8,304,535 5,196,265 3,865,000 9,974,300 15,717,100 96,407,500 PWTFL Secured - 3,226,963 - - - - Unsecured- - - - - - Other (Other Agencies)Secured - - - - - - Unsecured2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - 250,000 Other (Development)Secured - - - - - - Unscured200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000 Other (Muckleshoot)Secured547,300 - - - - - Unsecured- - - - - - Other Sources Secured - - - - - - Unsecured- - - - 800,000 13,075,000 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Projects & Financing Plan Summary 14 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 15 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 1 (3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW) TIP # 1 Project No:c207a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Ingrid Gaub LOS Corridor ID# 18 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 258,962 - 18,500 - 277,462 427,462 Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,235,779 4,586,930 785,000 - 6,607,709 6,607,709 Traffic Impact Fees 191,060 50,000 684,000 25,000 925,060 1,175,060 Other Sources (Developer)*- 207,560 200,000 - 407,560 407,560 1,685,801 4,844,490 1,687,500 25,000 8,217,791 8,617,791 - Capital Expenditures:Design 1,390,404 326,819 - - 1,717,223 1,717,223 Right of Way 295,397 768,373 - - 1,063,770 1,063,770 Construction - 3,749,298 1,687,500 25,000 5,436,798 5,836,798 1,685,801 4,844,490 1,687,500 25,000 8,217,791 8,617,791 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 168,500 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 785,000 - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 934,000 - Other Sources (Developer)*- - - - 200,000 - 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 - 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 - Grants / Other Sources:*Other funds are MultiCare h alf street contribution.Construct a multi-lane arterial from 3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW. This project will improve mobility an d is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the Comprehensi ve Plan and contributes to the completion of a nort h/south arterial corridor. The project length is approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the norther n property owner. If the property develops, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251 ,000).Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $25,830.Adopted Budget Progress Summary:Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final desi gn was completed along with the environmental proce ss. Construction began in 2011 and is expected to be completed in 2012. Co sts beyond 2012 are for wetland monitoring and plan ting.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 16 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to Fir TIP # 2 Project No:cp1118 Project Type:Non-Motorized Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 10,000 46,500 43,500 56,500 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 40,000 60,000 740,800 100,000 840,800 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - 50,000 106,500 784,300 156,500 940,800 Capital Expenditures:Design - 50,000 105,000 40,000 155,000 195,000 Right of Way - - 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 Construction - - - 744,300 - 744,300 - 50,000 106,500 784,300 156,500 940,800 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 90,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 800,800 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - 890,800 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 145,000 - Right of Way - - - - 1,500 - Construction - - - - 744,300 - - - - - 890,800 - Grants / Other Sources:Grants are $100K from Federa l Discretionary Funds and $740,830 from State Ped & Bike Safety Grants.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will construct pedestrian improvements along Auburn Way South between Dogwood St SE and F ir St SE that are consistent with WSDOT's SR-164 Route Development Plan. This pr oject includes sidewalk improvements, access manage ment, a mid-block pedestrian crossing, construction of a u-turn wedge at Fir St SE and street lighting.Progress Summary:Project design will begin in 2011 with construction expected to be completed in 2013. The City was aw arded $100,000 in federal funding and $740,830 in state funding in Ma y 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 17 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way Corridor Imp. (4th St NE to 4th St SE) TIP # 3 Project No:c409a0 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2-3 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 78,251 - - - 78,251 788,251 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,108,700 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - 78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951 Capital Expenditures:Design 78,251 - - - 78,251 696,951 Right of Way - - - - - 200,000 Construction - - - - - 3,000,000 78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 110,000 600,000 710,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - 618,700 - 618,700 - Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 - Construction - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 - Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is not secur ed.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project is based on a pre-design study and is intended to improve pedestrian accessibility, appea rance, and link the downtown area along Auburn Way South between 4th St NE and 4th St SE. This project may include some p avement repairs. However, an overlay was completed as part of the City's Arterial Pavement Preservation Progr am in 2007. Although this was considered a temporary fix, the scope has been modified to account for the pavement work. The project length is approximately a half mile.Progress Summary:The pavement portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 18 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: I Street NE Corridor (45th St. NE to S 277th St) TIP # 4 Project No:c415a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 21 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 271,127 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000 Other (*Port of Seattle)- - - - - - 11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 7,031,127 Capital Expenditures:Design 10,957 - 25,000 - 35,957 485,000 Right of Way 870 - 234,300 - 235,170 1,254,300 Construction - - - - - 5,280,000 11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 7,031,127 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 259,300 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources (Development)- - - 5,760,000 5,760,000 - Other (Port of Seattle)- - - - - - - - - 6,760,000 7,019,300 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 460,000 485,000 - Right of Way - - - 1,020,000 1,254,300 - Construction - - - 5,280,000 5,280,000 - - - - 6,760,000 7,019,300 - Grants / Other Sources:Mitigation Funds in the unrestricted fund balance. Grant is unsecured.*Developer in kind funds/services support this proj ect but do not pass through the city. $409K is Port of Seattle Total Expenditures:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $25,200.Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:The final alignment of the I Street Corridor is bei ng analyzed as part of the Northeast Auburn Special Area Plan Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW a nd Construction will be developer funded. The cros s section will likely be a 5-lane arterial per the city's Comprehensive P lan.Progress Summary:This project is development driven. The project ha s been delayed due to the delay of the nearby pendi ng development.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 19 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street Grade Separation (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5 Project No:c201a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 6 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 150,000 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)419,800 452,580 4,791,535 4,208,465 5,663,915 9,872,380 REET2 169,400 970,580 - - 1,139,980 1,139,980 Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)2,441,000 1,500,000 661,400 - 4,602,400 4,602,400 Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)- - - - - 3,613,500 Traffic Mitigation Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000 660,000 PWTFL - - - 3,226,963 - 3,226,963 Other Sources (Other Agencies)*180,200 54,940 2,096,800 1,249,400 2,331,940 3,581,340 3,870,400 3,128,100 7,549,735 8,684,828 14,548,235 23,233,063 Debt Service:3,613,500 Capital Expenditures:Design 2,522,300 511,000 - - 3,033,300 3,033,300 Right of Way 1,348,100 2,251,900 - - 3,600,000 3,600,000 Construction - 365,200 7,549,735 8,684,828 7,914,935 16,599,763 PWTFL Debt Service - - - - - 3,613,500 3,870,400 3,128,100 7,549,735 8,684,828 14,548,235 23,233,063 TotalExpenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 9,000,000 - REET2 - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)- - - - 661,400 - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 482,000 3,131,500 Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - 3,226,963 - Other Sources (Other Agencies)*- - - - 3,346,200 - 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563 3,131,500 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 16,234,563 - PWTFL Debt Service 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 482,000 3,131,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563 3,131,500 The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $21,827.Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M St SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks. Progress Summary:100% Design Drawings and right of way acquisition w ere completed in 2011. Construction is expected to start in early 2012.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:Grants / Other Sources: *Grants are Federal and St ate funds. Other Agencies include Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, BNSF, PSE and King County. PWTFL has 30 Year repayment schedule.ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 20 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: South 277th (Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge ) TIP # 6 Project No:c222a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 15 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 169,085 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - 2,500,000 Other - - - - - - 19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 4,669,085 Capital Expenditures:Design 18,510 - 150,000 - 168,510 418,510 Right of Way 575 - - - 575 250,575 Construction - - - - - 4,000,000 19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 4,669,085 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 150,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Development Funds)*- - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 - Other - - - - - - - - - 4,500,000 4,650,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 250,000 400,000 - Right of Way - - - 250,000 250,000 - Construction - - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 - - - - 4,500,000 4,650,000 - Grants / Other Sources:*Developer funds or in kind services. Total Expenditures:The annual maintenance costs for this project is es timated to be $27,250.Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project includes preliminary engineering, desi gn, right of way acquisition and construction of ma jor widening on S. 277th Street, including the addition of three lanes, one westbound and two eastbound, a Class 1 trail, storm , sewer and water improvements. The project length is nine-tenths of a mile. The final configuration will include thre e lanes eastbound and two lanes westbound.Progress Summary:The majority of this roadway is currently in the Ci ty of Kent's jurisdiction. Because the property se rved from the roadway is in the City of Auburn, the plan is to annex this porti on of the roadway from Kent into the City of Auburn . The majority of this project is expected to be completed by adjacent dev elopments.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 21 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP # 7 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 12 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 575,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,800,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 3,375,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 375,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,375,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 75,000 500,000 575,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - 375,000 - 375,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 - - - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:This project was originally scoped to include pavem ent preservation. The pavement preservation compon ent could still be combined with this project, but is also eligible fo r the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. This project should look to improve the railroad crossing grades as well as the vertical sight distance to the interurban trail to the west of the tracks. The cost estimate listed below is planning level cost. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 22 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW) TIP # 8 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 18 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,000,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Developer)*150,000 - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 400,000 Right of Way - - - - - 250,000 Construction 150,000 - - - 150,000 2,650,000 150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 150,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 3,000,000 3,000,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other (Developer)*- - - - - - - 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 150,000 250,000 400,000 - Right of Way - - - 250,000 250,000 - Construction - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 - - 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000 - Grants / Other Sources:*Anticipated developer contr ibutions (cash or in kind services). Grant fundin g shown is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Construct a multi-lane arterial from W Main to 3rd St NW. This project will connect A St NW, Phase 1 to the Sound Transit Station and the Central Business District. This pr oject may end up being funded all or in part by dev elopers. The project length is one fifth of a mile.Progress Summary:The parking garage constructed by the Auburn Region al Medical Center completed a portion of this proje ct in 2009. Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 23 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: D Street NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW) TIP # 9 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 20 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201111 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 4,250,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,050,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - - 6,300,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 1,050,000 Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000 Construction - - - - - 3,500,000 - - - - - 6,300,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 250,000 250,000 4,000,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 50,000 2,000,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 300,000 300,000 750,000 Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000 Construction - - - - - 3,500,000 - - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000 Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding shown is unsecu red.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $11,450.Adopted Budget Construct a four-lane arterial per the city Compreh ensive Plan. It will improve north/south mobility. This project is tied to potential future development and will complete a ma jor north/south arterial corridor from Ellingson Ro ad SW (41st Street SE) to S. 277th St. The D St NW project length is appro ximately 0.42 miles. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 24 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: F Street SE (4th St SE to Auburn Way S) TIP # 10 Project No:cp0911 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,200,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 7,620 - - - - 307,620 Other - - - - - - 7,620 - - - - 2,507,620 Capital Expenditures:Design 7,620 - - - 7,620 257,620 Right of Way - - - - - 75,000 Construction - - - - - 2,175,000 7,620 - - - 7,620 2,507,620 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000 - Other - - - - - - 250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 250,000 - - 250,000 - Right of Way - 75,000 - - 75,000 - Construction - 2,175,000 - - 2,175,000 - 250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $4100.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:The F St SE project includes pavement reconstructio n, installation of curbs, gutters, an 8-foot wide s idewalk on both sides, parking on one side, and a center turn-lane, as wel l as crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge. This project improves mobility and safety along the corri dor. The project length is approximately 0.3 miles. Progress Summary:Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Final design and construction are planned to be completed following construction of the M Street grade separa tion project.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 25 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP # 11 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,225,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 - 250,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 50,000 - 1,475,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 50,000 - 125,000 Right of Way - - - - - 200,000 Construction - - - - - 1,150,000 - - - 50,000 - 1,475,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000 - Other - - - - - - 275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 75,000 - - - 125,000 - Right of Way 200,000 - - - 200,000 - Construction - 1,150,000 - 1,150,000 - 275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $1,500.Adopted Budget This project will construct a complete 4 lane stree t section on M St NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE.Progress Summary:Pre-design will be done in 2013 to refine project s cope, alignment, and cost. Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 26 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard TIP # 12 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 125,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - 32,000,000 - - - - - 32,125,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 3,625,000 Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000 Construction - - - - - 24,500,000 - - - - - 32,125,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 - - 125,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Developer)- - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 31,000,000 - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 31,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 2,500,000 Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000 Construction - - - - - 24,500,000 - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 31,000,000 Grants / Other Sources:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Not scheduled for completion until after 2015.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:This project consists of a grade-separated crossing of the BNSF Railyard, either from SR-18 to 6th Str eet SE or from 15th Street SW to A Street SE. The first alternative wo uld entail realigning the SR-18 eastbound ramp, gra de separating the main north/south line and the Stampede Pass line, and co nnecting to 6th Street SE. The second alternative would provide a new corridor from 15th Street SW to A Street SE in the vicinity of 12th Street SE and 17th Street SE, eith er via an overpass or underpass of the BNSF Railyard. This project impro ves traffic flow significantly due to the potential development of the BNSF yard as an intermodal freight facility.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 27 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: West Valley Hwy Improvements (SR-18 to West Main St reet)TIP # 14 Project No:cp0916 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 35 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 58,730 5,000 - - 63,730 Grants (Fed,State,Local)139,726 2,210,920 - - - 2,350,646 REET 2 53,302 41,680 - - - 94,982 Traffic Mitigation Fees 75,000 - - - - 75,000 Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 530,000 - - - 555,000 293,028 2,841,330 5,000 - - 3,139,358 - - Capital Expenditures:- Design 293,028 339,680 - - 632,708 632,708 Right of Way - 5,580 - - 5,580 5,580 Construction - 2,496,070 5,000 - 2,501,070 2,501,070 293,028 2,841,330 5,000 - 3,139,358 3,139,358 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - 5,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 - Grants / Other Sources: TIB Grant (secured).Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will widen the roadway to accommodate an extension of the two way left turn lane, add cur b & gutter, storm drainage, repair failing roadway surface; install sidewalk on one side of the roadway; install city standard str eet lighting, improve bicycle accommodations, and install a new traffic signal at the intersection of West Main Street and West Vall ey Highway. This project will improve the capacity, safety, and driving comfort o f the corridor as well as reduce the amount of time maintenance staff spends doing temporary repairs. Progress Summary:Design started in 2010 and construction is planned for 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 28 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 8th Street NE Widening (Pike St to R St NE)TIP # 15 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,160,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 290,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - 250,000 Construction - - - - - 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,450,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 - Other - - - - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 200,000 - - - 200,000 - Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 - Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is unsecured .Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Add eastbound lane to Southside of 8th St NE. Curr ently the lane exists from M St NE and drops as a r ight turn only lane at the intersection of 8th St NE and Pike St. This wo uld extend the lane to R St NE where it would then be a right turn only lane onto R St NE southbound. This is a planning level cost estimate.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 29 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to I Street NE TIP # 16 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 29 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - - Other (Development)*- - - - - 3,350,000 - - - - - 3,350,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - 650,000 Construction - - - - - 2,500,000 - - - - - 3,350,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - - Other (Development)*- 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 - Right of Way - 650,000 - - 650,000 - Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 - Grants / Other Sources: *Future development is exp ected to fund and construct this project. Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $27,050.Adopted Budget Construct east/west corridor from Auburn Way North to I Street NE. The existing 49th Street NE extend s westerly to B Street NE. This project also includes a traffic signal at the intersection of Auburn Way North and 49th Stree t NE. This roadway was evaluated and recommended in the NE Special Plannin g Area. It is anticipated that this will be constr ucted by future development. It is approximately 3/4 of a mile in length. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 30 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Traffic Calming Improvements TIP #33 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:Pablo Para Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous 2 Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - Other (Redflex)- 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 1,400,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 1,400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 140,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 180,000 180,000 180,000 360,000 1,260,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 1,400,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Redflex money transferred f rom General Fund.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:Annual maintenance cost for these improvements are estimated to be Adopted Budget The City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program was adopted by City Council in November of 2005. Staf f receives complaints from citizens and then gathers data to confirm that a sp eeding issue and/or cut through traffic issue is pr esent. This money is for physical improvements to the streets once all other options have been exhausted. Physical improvements may inc lude items such as lighting, signing, striping, speed humps, speed tables, chica nes, traffic circles, and median treatments.Progress Summary:Program continues to implement valuable safety enhn ancements citywide. 2011 Improvements include const ruction of pedestrian activated crosswalk warning beacons, sig nage improvements and speed cushion installations.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 31 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3 TIP # 39 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 735,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 115,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - - 850,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - 135,000 Construction - - - - - 715,000 - - - - - 850,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 85,000 650,000 735,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - 15,000 100,000 115,000 - Other - - - - - - - - 100,000 750,000 850,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - 85,000 50,000 135,000 - Construction - - 15,000 700,000 715,000 - - - 100,000 750,000 850,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition, and construction of improvements to the s ignalized intersection of SE 320th St and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include constructing bike lanes, sidewalks, dual southbound left turn l anes into GRCC, and ITS. A portion of this project is the main entrance to Gre en River Community College and will require additio nal on-site improvements by GRCC.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 32 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1 TIP # 40 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 125,000 - 1,690,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 25,000 50,000 260,000 Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - 250,000 Construction - - - - - 1,500,000 - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000 - Traffic Impact Fees 185,000 - - - 260,000 - Other - - - - - - 1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 200,000 - Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 - Construction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 - 1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition, and construction of a 4-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on 124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th St.Progress Summary:Pre-design is planned for 2013.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 33 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 TIP # 41 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19, 23 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 965,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 30,000 - 215,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 30,000 - 1,180,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 30,000 - 80,000 Right of Way - - - - - 100,000 Construction - - - - - 1,000,000 - - - 30,000 - 1,180,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)100,000 865,000 - - 965,000 - Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 135,000 - - 215,000 - Other - - - - - - 150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 50,000 - - - 80,000 - Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 - 150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition, and construction of improvements to the s ignalized intersection of SE 312th St and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include adding bike lanes, dual westbound left turn lanes, dual southbo und thru lanes, northbound right turn pocket, ITS and pedestrian safety improv ements.Progress Summary:Pre-design is scheduled for 2013.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 34 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements TIP # 42 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 553,600 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 116,400 PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 670,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 90,000 Right of Way - - - - - 60,000 Construction - - - - - 520,000 - - - - - 670,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 51,500 502,100 - 553,600 - Traffic Impact Fees 30,000 8,500 77,900 - 116,400 - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 30,000 60,000 - - 90,000 - Right of Way - - 60,000 - 60,000 - Construction - - 520,000 - 520,000 - 30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition, and construction of a 3 lane roadway with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on SE 320th St between 124th Ave SE and the western en trance to GRCC.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 35 LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Downtown Promenade Improvements TIP # 52 Project No:cp1005 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak/Elizabeth Chamberlain Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Capital Improv. Fund- - - - - - Grants (Federal)- 2,137,986 55,100 - 2,193,086 2,193,086 REET1 - - - - - - Other (GO Bond)1,040,089 2,903,426 89,900 - 4,033,415 4,033,415 1,040,089 5,041,412 145,000 - 6,226,501 6,226,501 Capital Expenditures:Design 1,040,089 276,035 - - 1,316,124 1,316,124 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 4,765,377 145,000 - 4,910,377 4,910,377 1,040,089 5,041,412 145,000 - 6,226,501 6,226,501 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2016 Funding Sources:Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - - Grants (Federal)- - - - 55,100 - REET1 - - - - - - Other (GO Bond)- - - - 89,900 - - - - - 145,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 145,000 - - - - - 145,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is Federal EDA Grant. Other Funding is Local Revitalization Fundi ng GO Bond revenue.This project will fund the design, coordination, pe rmitting and construction of Downtown Promenade imp rovements. Project includes storm, sewer, water and roadway improvements of Div ision Street between Main St and 3rd St SW/SE.Progress Summary:Design and construction will be completed in 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:Adopted Budget ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 36 LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian Lighting TIP # 57 Project No:cp1116 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Capital Improv. Fund- - - - - - Grants (Federal)- - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other (GO Bond)- 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000 - 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 16,500 - - 16,500 16,500 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 429,000 39,500 - 468,500 468,500 - 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2016 Funding Sources:Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - - Grants (Federal)- - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other (GO Bond)- - - - 39,500 - - - - - 39,500 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 39,500 - - - - - 39,500 - Grants / Other Sources:Other Funding is Local Revit alization Funding GO Bond revenue.Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Adjusted Budget This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Budget Amendments Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, coordination, pe rmitting and construction of Downtown street lighti ng replacements. Progress Summary:Design and construction will be completed in 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 37 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South Corridor Imp., Fir ST SE to Hemloc k ST SE TIP # 58 Project No:cp1119 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (State)- 237,000 2,189,400 - 2,426,400 2,426,400 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources(Muckleshoot)- 59,300 547,300 - 606,600 606,600 - 296,300 2,736,700 3,033,000 3,033,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 281,300 77,000 - 358,300 358,300 Right of Way - 15,000 262,000 - 277,000 277,000 Construction - - 2,397,700 - 2,397,700 2,397,700 - 296,300 2,736,700 - 3,033,000 3,033,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (State)- - - - 2,189,400 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources(Muckleshoot)- - - - 547,300 - - - - - 3,033,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 77,000 - Right of Way - - - - 262,000 - Construction - - - - 2,397,700 - - - - - 2,736,700 - Grants / Other Sources:State Grant is TIB.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This annual maintenance cost for this project is es timated to be $9,300.Adopted Budget This project will widen Auburn Way South between Fi r St SE and Hemlock St SE to five lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks, illumination and storm improvements. A new traffic signal will a lso be constructed at Hemlock Street SE and connect to Auburn's Intelligent Transportation System. Progress Summary:Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) awarded grant in the amount of $2,426,400 on N ovember 19, 2010 to the City of Auburn. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 38 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)TIP # 60 Project No:xxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 468,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,645,600 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,527,200 REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 6,640,800 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 631,800 Right of Way - - - - - 1,263,600 Construction - - - - - 4,745,400 - - - - - 6,640,800 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - 234,000 234,000 - 468,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 397,800 3,247,800 - 3,645,600 - Traffic Impact Fees - 1,263,600 1,263,600 - 2,527,200 - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 631,800 - - 631,800 - Right of Way - 1,263,600 - - 1,263,600 - Construction - - 4,745,400 - 4,745,400 - - 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Construct a multi-lane arterial from 8TH Street SE to AWS. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contribu tes to the completion of a north/south arterial cor ridor.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 39 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South Bypass TIP # 61 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID#4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 60,450,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 60,450,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 6,500,000 Right of Way - - - - - 8,450,000 Construction - - - - - 45,500,000 - - - - - 60,450,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 6,500,000 6,500,000 - Right of Way - - - 8,450,000 8,450,000 - Construction - - - 45,500,000 45,500,000 - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Construction of a new Auburn Way South Bypass conne cting SR 164 to SR 18 via Riverwalk Drive and a new R Street interchange. The project will improve traffic operations on SR 164 a nd will have fewer intersections operating over cap acity during the PM Peak hour. It will also improve sight distance and roadway geomet rics to provide drivers with improved visibility an d overall safety. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 40 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street SE)TIP # 62 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Miscellaneous Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 800,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,250,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - 700,000 - - - - - 4,750,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 500,000 Right of Way - - - - - 1,450,000 Construction - - - - - 2,800,000 - - - - - 4,750,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 400,000 400,000 800,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 1,200,000 2,050,000 3,250,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - 350,000 350,000 700,000 - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - 500,000 - 500,000 - Right of Way - - 1,450,000 - 1,450,000 - Construction - - - 2,800,000 2,800,000 - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget The purpose of this project is to revitalize and be autify Auburn Way South from the SR 18 interchange to the intersection of M Street SE. Proposed improvements include: enhancement of cross walks and pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sid ewalks; curb and gutter; pedestrian ramps; new landscaped medians; street tr ees; new lighting; pedestrian benches; trash recept acles; recycling containers and other appropriate amenities.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 41 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 104th Ave SE) TIP # 64 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201212 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 1,550,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,250,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 1,250,000 Other - - - - - 12,650,000 - - - - - 24,700,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 2,500,000 Right of Way - - - - - 3,750,000 Construction - - - - - 18,450,000 - - - - - 24,700,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 300,000 1,250,000 1,550,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 5,500,000 3,750,000 9,250,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 - Other - - 450,000 12,200,000 12,650,000 - - - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 - Right of Way - - 3,750,000 - 3,750,000 - Construction - - 18,450,000 18,450,000 - - - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Expand current two-lane roadway to 4-lanes, includi ng widening of the Green River Bridge. Project inc ludes bike lanes and sidewalks.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 42 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (104th Ave SE to 112th Ave SE ) TIP # 65 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID #23 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,000,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,400,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - - 11,400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 1,200,000 Right of Way - - - - - 1,800,000 Construction - - - - - 8,400,000 - - - - - 11,400,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 9,000,000 9,000,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 2,400,000 2,400,000 - Other - - - - - - - - - 11,400,000 11,400,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 1,200,000 1,200,000 - Right of Way - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 - Construction - - - 8,400,000 8,400,000 - - - - 11,400,000 11,400,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Project includes widening from existing 2-lane ro adway to 4-lanes with bicycle lanes and sidewalks.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 43 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) TIP # 66 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity LOS Corridor ID #23 Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,100,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 700,000 Other - - - - - 525,000 - - - - - 3,575,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 350,000 Right of Way - - - - - 525,000 Construction - - - - - 2,700,000 - - - - - 3,575,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 250,000 250,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 2,100,000 2,100,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 700,000 700,000 - Other - - - 525,000 525,000 - - - - 3,575,000 3,575,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 350,000 350,000 - Right of Way - - - 525,000 525,000 - Construction - - - 2,700,000 2,700,000 - - - - 3,575,000 3,575,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Project includes widening from existing 2-lane ro adway to 4-lanes with bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Improvement Projects 44 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 45 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Harvey Road & 8th Street NE Intersection Improvemen ts TIP # 17 Project No:cp0611 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 5,19 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)87,100 87,700 87,300 86,900 262,100 1,602,700 Traffic Impact Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500 204,500 PWTF 1,527,300 - - - 1,527,300 1,527,300 1,818,900 87,700 87,300 86,900 1,993,900 1,731,800 Debt Service:1,602,700 Capital Expenditures:Design 285,000 - - - 285,000 285,000 Right of Way 196,500 - - - 196,500 196,500 Construction 1,250,300 - - - 1,250,300 1,250,300 Long Term Debt - PWTF 87,100 87,700 87,300 86,900 262,100 1,602,700 1,818,900 87,700 87,300 86,900 1,993,900 1,731,800 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - PWTF - - - - - - 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Long Term Debt - PWTF 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400 Grants / Other Sources: PWTFLhas a 20 year term end ing in 2028.Total Funding Sources:Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Budget Amendments Add one eastbound through/right turn lane on 8th St NE approaching Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traffic channelization to accommodate the new lane. The ad ditional lane will improve traffic delays and vehic le queuing at the intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all dire ctions. This project will reconstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles in lengt h with four travel lanes. The reconstruction will fix the existing poor pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the side walk network. Progress Summary:Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is fo r PWTFL debt payments.Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 46 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 8th Street NE and R St NE Imp. (104th Ave SE St U-t urn)TIP # 18 Project No:CP1104 Project Type:Intersection Improvement, Capacity Project Manager:Robert Lee LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 157,000 - - 157,000 Grants (Federal)- 50,000 50,000 - - 100,000 REET2 - - 75,000 - 75,000 75,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Redflex)- - 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 332,000 - 125,000 382,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 30,000 - - 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - 20,000 - - 20,000 20,000 Construction - - 332,000 - 332,000 332,000 - 50,000 332,000 - 382,000 382,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 157,000 - Grants (Federal)- - - - 50,000 - REET2 - - - - 75,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Redflex)- - - - 50,000 - - - - - 332,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 332,000 - - - - - 332,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Federal Discretionary grant is secured.The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $6,600.Adopted Budget This project includes the design, right of way acqu isistion and construction of intersection improveme nts that will either consist of either a traffic signal with easbound u-turn capacity or a roundabout design.Progress Summary:The design began in 2011 with construction schedule d for 2012.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 47 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improvement s TIP # 19 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 - 175,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 425,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 50,000 - 600,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - 100,000 Construction - - - - - 450,000 - - - 50,000 - 600,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - - - 175,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)425,000 - - - 425,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 550,000 - - - 600,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 50,000 - Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Construction 450,000 - - - 450,000 - 550,000 - - - 600,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will construct a new complete traffic signal with controller cabinet and battery backup a long with necessary intersection improvements. Progress Summary:Design will be completed in 2013. Construction is p lanned for 2014.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 48 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Imp.TIP # 20 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3,4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 25,000 75,000 - - 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 850,000 - 850,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - 150,000 - 150,000 Other - - - - - - - 25,000 75,000 1,000,000 - 1,100,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 25,000 75,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 Construction - - 800,000 - 800,000 - 25,000 75,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 75,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 850,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - 150,000 - Other - - - - - - - - - - 1,075,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 75,000 - Right of Way - - - - 200,000 - Construction - - - - 800,000 - - - - - 1,075,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is unsecured .Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Construct a westbound to northbound right turn pock et at the intersection of Auburn Way S and M St SE. This project would also improve the turning radius at this same corner allowing drivers to make a safe right turn on red (after stopping and yielding to oncoming vehicles). Currently the inte rsection geometry has necessitated the City placing a legal restriction on this movement. Progress Summary:Pre-design is anticipated to begin in 2011 with fin al design to be completed in 2012. Construction wil l be completed when funding is secured.Future Impact on Operating Budget:ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 49 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: C Street NW and West Main Street TIP # 21 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 11 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 20,000 - 220,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 80,000 - 880,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 100,000 - 1,100,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - 400,000 Construction - - - - - 600,000 - - - 100,000 - 1,100,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 200,000 - - - 220,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)800,000 - - - 880,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 100,000 - Right of Way 400,000 - - - 400,000 - Construction 600,000 - - - 600,000 - 1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Grant Funding is unsecured .Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Reconstruct intersection at C St NW and W Main St. Project would include a new traffic signal and mod ifications to the turning radii at each corner to help facilitate veh icular movements. The new traffic signal would all ow for protected left turn phasing for northbound and southbound left turn mov ements. This would also provide additional safety related to the railroad pre-emption.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 50 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: F Street SE & 4th Street SE Traffic Signal TIP # 25 Project No:cp0914 Project Type:Non-Capacity Intersection Improvement Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 7,807 1,090 1,000 - 9,897 9,897 Grants (Fed,State,Local)265,633 127,470 - - 393,103 393,103 REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 273,440 128,560 1,000 - 403,000 403,000 Capital Expenditures:Design 48,168 - - - 48,168 48,168 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 225,272 128,560 1,000 - 354,832 354,832 273,440 128,560 1,000 - 403,000 403,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 1,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 1,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant is Federal HSIP funded and does not require a city match.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $6,600.Adopted Budget This project includes the construction of a new tra ffic signal at the intersection of 4th St SE and F St SE. Intersection improvements will include crosswalks and pedestrian signals. This pr oject was selected based on accident history, traff ic volumes, and pedestrian flow patterns. Progress Summary:Project was completed in 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 51 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements TIP # 38 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Intersection Safety (Non-Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,750,000 REET - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 3,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 500,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 2,500,000 - - - - - 3,000,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 150,000 - 250,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000 - REET - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 200,000 300,000 - 500,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 1,000,000 1,500,000 - 2,500,000 - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $5,000.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, coordination, pe rmitting and construction of four quadrant gates at the W Main St, 3rd St NW, and 37th St NW BNSF Railroad crossings as well as active gra de crossing lights and gates at the private spur cr ossings on C St SW and A St NW.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 52 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Intersection Improveme nts TIP # 43 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,076,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 324,000 PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 2,400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - 200,000 Construction - - - - - 2,050,000 - - - - - 2,400,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 1,951,000 - 2,076,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - 25,000 299,000 - 324,000 - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 150,000 - - 150,000 - Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 - Construction - - 2,050,000 - 2,050,000 - - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at Auburn Way S and Riverwalk Dr SE. This project will includ e creating eastbound/westbound dual left turn lanes , auxiliary signal heads and pedestrian safety enhancements.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 53 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 29th Street SE & R Street SE Intersection Improveme nts TIP # 63 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID#4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants (State)- - - - - 2,325,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 620,000 PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 2,945,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 310,000 Right of Way - - - - - 465,000 Construction - - - - 2,170,000 - - - - - 2,945,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (State)- - - 2,325,000 2,325,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 620,000 620,000 - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 2,945,000 2,945,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 310,000 310,000 - Right of Way - - - 465,000 465,000 - Construction - - - 2,170,000 2,170,000 - - - - 2,945,000 2,945,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, right of way acq uisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at 29th Street SE and R Street SE. This project will include creat ing eastbound/westbound dual left turn lanes, auxil iary signal heads and pedestrian safety enhancements.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection Improvement Projects 54 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems I mprovement Projects 55 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Traffic Signal Improvements TIP #34 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:Scott Nutter Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous 2 Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000 Other - - - - - - - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 70,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 165,000 165,000 165,000 330,000 1,155,000 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 - Other - - - - - - 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 990,000 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 - Grants / Other Sources:This project includes procuring and installing traf fic signal equipment upgrades for existing signals as well as safety/capacity improvements for existing and/or new signals. The C ity uses accident and traffic count data to identif y intersections in need of improvements.Progress Summary:Project continues to complete intersection safety i mprovements.Future Impact on Operating Budget:None Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems I mprovement Projects 56 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP # 50 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (ITS)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 180,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,140,000 REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 1,320,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 120,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 1,200,000 - - - - - 1,320,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000 120,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000 760,000 REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 880,000 Capital Expenditures:Design 20,000 - 20,000 - 40,000 80,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 200,000 - 200,000 - 400,000 800,000 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 880,000 Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $5000. Adopted Budget This project will fund the design and construction of Dynamic Message signs at various locations throu ghout the city. Dynamic message signs are an important tool in ITS for informing ro adway users. Priority locations for sign installati ons are based on the Comprehensive Transportation Plans ITS map and include Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highwa y and Lea Hill Rd.Progress Summary:The first phase of this project is scheduled to beg in in 2014 or sooner if grant funding becomes avail able. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems I mprovement Projects 57 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: East Valley Highway ITS Expansion TIP # 51 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 692,000 - 692,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 108,000 - 108,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 800,000 - 800,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 85,000 - 85,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - 715,000 - 715,000 - - - 800,000 - 800,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 692,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 108,000 - Other - - - - - - - - - - 800,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 85,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 715,000 - - - - - 800,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $5000. Adopted Budget This project will fund the design, coordination, pe rmitting and construction of ITS facilities from 41 st St SE to Lake Tapps Parkway.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems I mprovement Projects 58 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 59 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass TIP # 23 Project No:c229a0 Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 53,900 - - - 53,900 53,900 Grants (Fed,State,Local)170,400 - - - 170,400 9,720,400 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - Other - - - - - 250,000 224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300 Capital Expenditures:Design 224,300 - - - 224,300 974,300 Right of Way - - - - - 50,000 Construction - - - - - 9,000,000 224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 4,550,000 4,550,000 5,000,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other (Other Agencies)*- - - 250,000 250,000 - - - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - 750,000 750,000 - Right of Way - - - 50,000 50,000 - Construction - - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 - - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: *KC Open Space Bond and High Speed Rail Safety Money.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $240.Adopted Budget Project to construct an undercrossing of the BNSF R ailroad in conjunction with a pedestrian bridge to allow a safe, direct, attractive non-motorized access between neighborhoo ds in the City of Pacific and schools in the City o f Auburn. Progress Summary:The design is on hold. Funding source is most like ly a federal earmark. Currently this project is on hold pending some discussions with BNSF RR. They are in the process of planning for a third rail which would significan tly impact the design. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 60 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail TIP # 24 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 135,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 765,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - - 900,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 850,000 - - - - - 900,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 382,500 382,500 765,000 - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 425,000 425,000 850,000 - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $1,680.Adopted Budget This project will use existing right-of-way to repa ir the damaged roadbed to a usable multi-use trail on Academy Dr from the Green River Rd to Auburn Way S.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 61 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shutt les TIP # 26 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Transit Service Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Other (TBD)- - - - - - 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Operating Costs 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Other (TBD)- - - - - - 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Operating Costs 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 - 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Operation costs associated with two new Metro route s: a Commuter Shuttle from the Lakeland Hills neigh borhood to Auburn Station and a Community Shuttle linking residential neighborhoo ds with commercial and service centers. Progress Summary:Lakeland Hill Service began in 2009. The community shuttle will begin service in 2010. Funding assist ance will be requested through the Transit Now Partnership Program.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 62 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program TIP # 30 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (Bi-Annual)Project Manager:Pablo Para Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 100,000 100,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 90,000 - 90,000 270,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 10,000 - 10,000 - 30,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 90,000 - 90,000 - 270,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This is a bi-annual level of effort project used to fund small pedestrian safety studies and improveme nt projects. This project provides for pedestrian safety studies and improvem ents at various locations citywide. Projects are p rioritized annually based on safety issues and pedestrian demands. Progress Summary:Project for 2011 was preliminary design of 8th St N E and SE 104th St intersection improvements. 2012 p roject is access improvements at Auburn Ave and 3rd St NE.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 63 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements TIP # 31 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (Safety)Project Manager:Various Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300 Capital Expenditures:Design 19,300 57,000 10,000 10,000 86,300 136,300 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 43,000 90,000 90,000 133,000 583,000 19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:This is an annual level of effort project focused o n funding bicycle and safety improvements on classi fied roadways. Projects are prioritized annually based upon field studies. Project was previously called "Citywide Roadway Saf ety Infrastructure Improvements.Progress Summary:Projects for 2011 included preliminary design of in tersection improvements at 8th st NE and SE 104th S t and pedestrian trail improvements at 37th St SE. 2012 Project has yet to be indentified.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 64 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide Sidewalk Improvements TIP #32 Project No:Various Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - 180,000 20,000 180,000 380,000 780,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 180,000 20,000 180,000 380,000 780,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 2,000 2,000 10,000 4,000 38,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 170,000 18,000 170,000 358,000 734,000 - 172,000 20,000 180,000 192,000 772,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 2,000 10,000 2,000 10,000 36,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 18,000 170,000 18,000 170,000 564,000 - 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Project will fund sidewalk improvements to a variet y of locations throughout the city. A sidewalk inv entory was completed in 2004. Annual projects are selected based upon crit eria such as: gap closure, safe walking routes to s chools, completion of downtown pedestrian corridor or "linkage", connecti vity to transit services, ADA requirements, and "Sa ve our Streets" (SOS) project locations.Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget:None ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 65 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements TIP # 44 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Sidewalk Improvements (Non-Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 150,000 REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 135,000 - - - - - 150,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 150,000 - - 150,000 - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 15,000 - - 15,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 135,000 - - 135,000 - - 150,000 - - 150,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:The annual maintenance cost for this project is est imated to be $500.Adopted Budget This project completes a pedestrian connection betw een Downtown Auburn and the 8th St NE business dist rict. This project will improve a pedestrian crossing at 3rd St NE, and construct s idewalks/access ramps along the A St NE corridor. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 66 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Interurban Trailhead Improvements TIP # 45 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Non-Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 210,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - 210,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 20,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 190,000 - - - - - 210,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 210,000 - - 210,000 - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 210,000 - - 210,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - 20,000 - - 20,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 190,000 - - 190,000 - - 210,000 - - 210,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project provides funding for enhancements to e xisting trailheads and construction of new trailhea ds. Improvements include bike racks, kiosks, parking and access.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 67 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements TIP # 56 Project No:cp1120 Project Type:Non-Motorized Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500 Capital Expenditures:Design - 25,000 - - 25,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 373,500 - 373,500 373,500 - 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 373,500 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - REET2 - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 373,500 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 373,500 - - - - - 373,500 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will construct pedestrian improvements along the south side of SE 312th St east of the in tersection with 124th Ave SE, intersection improvements at 116th Ave SE & SE 304t h St, paint bike lanes on 116th Ave SE between SE 3 12th St and SE 304th St and improve curb ramps adjacent to Rainier Middle Schoo l.Progress Summary:The City was awarded $398,500 in federal funding in May 2011, which consists of $75,700 for School Dis trict education/encouragement, $1,800 for Police Dept. en forcement and $321,000 for engineering, right of wa y, and construction.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 68 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 69 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project TIP #13 Project No:cp0767 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Jeff Dixon/Leah Dunsdon Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost General Fund - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 455,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 505,000 700,000 REET 2 176,150 - - - 176,150 176,150 631,150 25,000 25,000 20,000 681,150 175,000 Capital Expenditures:Design 148,300 - - - 148,300 - Right of Way - - - - - 552,850 Construction 482,850 25,000 25,000 20,000 532,850 876,150 631,150 25,000 25,000 20,000 681,150 175,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:General Fund - - - - - - Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000 REET 2 - - - - - - 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000 Capital Expenditures:- Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000 Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:It is anticipated that annual maintenance, monitori ng and reporting on the performance of the wetland mitigation project will be required for a period of 10 years, in conformance with permi t requirements. After the successful conclusion of this 10-year monitoring period, which is anticipated to be in December 2019, ongoin g operation expenses should be minimal.Adopted Budget The project consists of the design, construction, m aintenance and monitoring of approximately 2.2-acre s of wetland creation and approximately 0.4-acres of wetland enhancement within the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sew er Utility in order to compensate for approximately 1.6-acre wetl and loss on the Mohawk Plastics property (Parcel # 1321049056). The project was approved under an existing agreement ap proved by Resolution No. 4196, June 2007. Progress Summary:The City received the DOE WQ Certification, WDFW HP A, and on May 7, 2009, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 404 wetland permit (NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid specifications and construction plans were prepared and construction began in October 2009. Construction was completed in January 2010 and the project is currently within the 10-year monitoring period, which involves annual maintenanc e, monitoring and reporting. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 70 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management St udy TIP # 27 Project No:cp1110 Project Type:Safety (Non-Capacity)Project Manager:Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID# 10,33 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 2,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 2,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 2,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - 2,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:This study will have no impact on the operating bud get for street maintenance.Adopted Budget Study the area from 37th St SE to the White River o n A St SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study should review the safety and access needs of the tra veling public and the adjacent properties.Progress Summary:Pre-design will be done to refine project scope, al ignment, and cost. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 71 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: South 277th - Wetland Mitigation TIP # 29 Project No:c410a0 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620 Capital Expenditures:Design 81,903 31,000 12,500 12,500 125,403 150,403 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 44,317 91,400 12,500 12,500 148,217 173,217 126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 25,000 - - - 75,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 25,000 - - - 75,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 12,500 - - - 37,500 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 12,500 - - - 37,500 - 25,000 - - - 75,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adjusted Budget Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Wetland mitigation for the 277th St Grade Separatio n project.Progress Summary:This is a 10-year obligation, which began in 2004.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 72 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study TIP # 46 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity (Intersection Safety)Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# 24 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 3,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 3,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 3,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - 3,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project will fund a pre-design study to determ ine the right of way, environmental and constructio n requirements for intersection safety improvements. This safety project scope will include sight distance improvements, constructing turn lanes, channelization, environmental mitigation, signage and clear zone im provements.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 73 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study TIP # 47 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description:This project will fund a Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance Adopted Budget - - - - Budget Amendments - - - - Adjusted Budget - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 5,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 5,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total Expenditures:- - - - - 5,000 Forecasted Project Cost:Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - 5,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 5,000 - 5,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total Expenditures:- - 5,000 - 5,000 - Grants / Other Sources: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 74 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Stu dy TIP # 48 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Bike Lanes, Sidewalks and Transit Improvement Study (Capacity)Project Manager:TBD Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 10,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 10,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 10,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - 10,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project provides funding to complete a study o f the 2nd St SE & F St SE corridor between Les Gove Park and Downtown Auburn. Improvements may include pavement reconstruction, s idewalks, access ramps, signal modifications and ro ute signing.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 75 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: S 316th Street Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Stu dy TIP # 49 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Class 2 Bike Lanes / Sidewalks (Capacity)Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 37 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 5,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 5,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 5,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - 5,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This project provides funding for completing a stud y to add bicycle and pedestrian facilities on S 316 th St from east of Evergreen Heights Elementary to 51st Ave S.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 76 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Kersey Way Study TIP # 54 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 500,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 6,300,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - 200,000 - 200,000 700,000 Other - - - - - - - - 200,000 - 200,000 7,500,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 7,300,000 - - 200,000 - 200,000 7,500,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - 500,000 - - 500,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000 3,150,000 REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - 200,000 500,000 Other - - - - - - 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000 3,650,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - 200,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 3,650,000 - - 3,650,000 3,650,000 - 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000 3,650,000 Grants / Other Sources: Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Forecasted Project Cost:Total Funding Sources:None Adopted Budget This project will study improvements to the Kersey Way SE corridor from the White River Bridge to the southern city limits. The study will develop the scope and costs for horizont al/vertical geometric roadway improvements, roadsid e hazard mitigation, street lighting and non-motorized trail construction. The project length is approximately two miles.Progress Summary:Design will begin in 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 77 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Mary Olson Farm Improvements TIP # 55 Project No:cp0815 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue 85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100 106,100 Grants (Federal)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100 106,100 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 85,100 20,000 1,000 - - 106,100 85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 1,000 - Grants (Federal)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - 1,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 - Grants / Other Sources: Federal grant is FHWA Mitiga tion Funds $101K received in prior years.Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This is a historical preservation project required as mitigation for S 277th Reconstruction Project. Progress Summary:Phase 1 was the S. 277th St Reconstruction Project. Phase II of the project was completed in 2009 and Phase 3 is scheduled to be completed in 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 78 ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Preservation Projects ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Annual Bridge Preservation Project TIP # 28 Project No:Various Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000 - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - REET - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:This project will have no impact on the operating b udget for street maintenance.Adopted Budget This is an annual level of effort project used to f und bridge improvements as identified by the city's annual bridge inspection program.Progress Summary:Program completed load rating calculations for nine bridges in 2011.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Preservation Projects 80 STREET FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Arterial Street Preservation Program Project No:cpxxxx TIP #35 Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year EndTotal Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Property Tax - - - - - - Utility Tax - 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000 REET2 - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 60,000 25,000 25,000 85,000 310,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 1,306,000 1,275,000 1,275,000 2,581,000 8,856,000 - 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000 TotalExpenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Property Tax - - - - - - Utility Tax 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 - REET2 - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,550,000 - 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:None Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Progress Summary:Program continues to successfully complete annual patching and overlay projects citywide.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or reha bilitation of various classified streets citywide. These projects may include overlays, rebuilds, spot repai rs, or a combination of these. This program is fun ded through a 1% utility tax that was adopted by Council in 2008. ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Preservation Projects 81 STREET FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Arterial Crack Seal Program Project No:cpxxxx TIP #36 Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Utility Tax - 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000 REET - - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000 Capital Expenditures:Design - 10,000 15,000 15,000 25,000 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 130,000 185,000 185,000 315,000 1,240,000 - 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Utility Tax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - REET - - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 1,110,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 - Grants / Other Sources:Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost:None Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Implement regular maintenance of various classified streets by sealing newly formed cracks. Sealing t he cracks will prolong the life of the pavement by stopping water from draining into t he subbase of the road.Progress Summary:Program continues to successfully extend pavement l ife pavement citywide.Future Impact on Operating Budget: ACT.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Preservation Projects 82 LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program Project No:Various TIP #37 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Wickstrom Description:Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance - - - - - - - - - - - - Activity:(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost Local Street Fund - - - - - - Property Tax - 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220 Utility Mitigation - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220 Capital Expenditures:Design - 120,000 180,000 180,000 300,000 1,200,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 3,278,220 1,820,000 1,820,000 5,098,220 14,198,220 - 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220 Total Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017 Funding Sources:Local Street Fund - - - - - - Property Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 - Utility Mitigation - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Other - - - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000 - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 1,820,000 1,820,000 1,820,000 1,820,000 10,920,000 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 - Grants / Other Sources:None Adopted Budget This program was created after passage of Propositi on 1 on the November '04 ballot, setting the City's property tax levy limits and creating a dedicated local street fund to be used s olely for local street improvements. The program wi ll focus on the preservation of local streets (unclassified streets) within the City of A uburn. The work will include crack sealing, asphal t patching, pre-leveling, asphalt overlays and roadway reconstruction. The property tax levy lift may also be used to repay bonds shoul d they be utilized to fund this program.Progress Summary:This program has successfully completed overlays since 2005. In 2011 and 2012 the program will focus on major str eet reconstruction where street surfaces and the underlying b ase has failed.Future Impact on Operating Budget:Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget Total Funding Sources:Total Expenditures:Total Expenditures:Total Funding Sources:Forecasted Project Cost: ACT.A
R o a dway Improvements Grant Status*Prior to 2012201220132014201520162017Beyond 2017 C207A01A St NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW)S 4,100,0001,687,50025,00025,000300,00025,00025,000- 6,187,500 Cp11182Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to FirS 50,000106,500784,300- - - - - 940,800 C409A03Auburn Way Imp (4th St NE to 4th St SE)WA'12 78,251- - - - 818,7003,000,000- 3,896,951 C415A04I St NE (45th St NE to S 277th St)N/A 11,827259,300- - 6,760,000- - - 7,031,127 C201A05M St SE Grade Separation (3rd ST NE to 8th St SE)S 6,998,5007,549,7008,684,828120,500120,500120,500120 ,500- 23,715,028 C222A06S 277th Street (AWN to Green River Bridge)WA'12 19,085150,000- - - - 4,500,000- 4,669,085 cpxxxx715th St SW Reconstruction (C St SW to UPRR)WA'12 - - - - 3,000,000375,000- - 3,375,000 cpxxxx8A St NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW)PS 150,000- - - 150,000- 3,000,000- 3,300,000 cpxxxx9D St NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW)WA'14 - - - - - - 300,0006,000,0006,300,000 CP091110F St SE (4th St SE to AWS)WA'13 7,620- - 250,0002,250,000- - - 2,507,620 cpxxxx11M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE)WA'13 - - 50,000275,0001,150,000- - - 1,475,000 cpxxxx12BNSF Railyard Grade-Separated CrossingN/A - - - - 125,000- 1,000,00031,000,00032,125,00 0 cp091614West Valley Hwy Improvemnts (SR-18 to West Main Street)S 3,134,3585,000- - - - - - 3,139,358 cpxxxx158th St NE (Pike St to R St NE)A'12 - - - 450,0001,000,000- - - 1,450,000 cpxxxx1649th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street NEWA'1 3 - - - - 850,0002,500,000- 3,350,000 Varies33Traffic Calming Improvements N/A 200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000- - 1,200,000 cpxxxx39124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 3WA'13 - - - - - 100,000750,000- 850,000 cpxxxx40124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 1WA'14 50,000150,0001,750,000- - - - 1,950,000 cpxxxx41124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 2WA'13 - - - 150,0001,750,000- - - 1,900,000 cpxxxx42SE 320th St Corridor Imp WA'12 - - 30,000150,0001,000,000- - - 1,180,000 cp100552Downtown Promenade ImprovementsS - 145,000- - - - - - 145,000 cp111657Downtown Pedestrian Lighting S - 39,500- - - - - - 39,500 cp111958AWS Corridor Imp (Fir to Hemlock)S - 2,736,700- - - - - - 2,736,700 cpxxxx60M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)WA'15 - - - - 1,895,4004,745,400- - 6,640,800 cpxxxx61Auburn Way South Bypass WA'17 - - - - - - 60,450,000- 60,450,000 cpxxxx62AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street SE)WA'16 - - - - - 1,950,0002,800,000- 4,750,000 cpxxxx64Lea Hill Road Segment 1(R St NE to 104th Ave SE)WA'16 - - - - - 6,250,00018,450,000- 24,700,000 cpxxxx65Lea Hill Road Segment 2 (104th to 112th Ave SE) WA'1 7 - - - - - - 11,400,000- 11,400,000 cpxxxx66Lea Hill Road Segment 3 (112th to 124th Ave SE )WA'17 - - - - - - 3,575,000- 3,575,000 14,749,64112,929,2009,924,1283,370,50020,550,90017,084,600109,370,50037,000,000224,979,469 Intersection Improvements CP061117Harvey/8th Street Imp - Debt ServiceN/A 303,90087,30086,90086,50086,00085,60085,200910,4001 ,731,800 cp1104188th St NE & R St NE Improvements (104th Ave SE U-Turn)S 50,000332,000- - - - - 382,000 cpxxxx19Auburn Way North/1 Street NE Signal ImpWA'12 - - 50,000550,000- - - - 600,000 cpxxxx20Auburn Way South and M Street SE WA'12 25,00075,0001,000,000- - - - 1,100,000 cpxxxx21C Street NW and West Main Street WA'12 - - 100,000 1 ,000,000- - - 1,100,000 cp091425F St SE & 4th St SE Traffic Signal S 273,4401,000 274,440 cpxxxx38Railroad Crossing Safety ImprovementsWA'12 - - - - 1,200,0001,800,000- - 3,000,000 cpxxxx43Auburn Way South & Riverwalk ImpA'11 - - - - 150,0002,250,000- 2,400,000 cpxxxx6329th Street SE & R Street SE WA'16 - - - - - - 2,945,000- 2,945,000 652,340495,3001,236,9001,636,5001,436,0004,135,6003 ,030,200910,40013,533,240 Traffic Signal & ITS Improvements Varies34Traffic Signal Improvement ProgramsN/A - 175,000175,000175,000175,000 175,000175,000- 1,050,000 cpxxxx50ITS Dynamic Message Signs WA'13 - - - 220,000- 220,000- 440,000 cpxxxx51East Valley Hwy ITS Expansion WA'13 - - 800,000- - - - 800,000 - 175,000975,000395,000175,000 395,000175,000- 2,290,000 Non-Motorized & Transit Improvements C229A023BNSF/East Valley Hwy. Ped UndercrossingPS 224,300- - - - - 4,800,0005,024,300 cpxxxx24Academy Drive Multi Use Trail WA'13 - - - - 50,000425,000425,000- 900,000 NA26Auburn Community and Lakeland ShuttlesN/A - 220,000220,000220,000220,000 220,000220,000- 1,320,000 Varies30Citywide Pedestrian Crossing ProgramN/A - 100,000- 100,000- 100,000- - 300,000 Varies31Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Imp N/A 119,300100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000- 719,300 Varies32Citywide Sidewalk Improvements N/A 425,10020,000180,00020,000180,00020,000180,000- 1,025,100 cpxxxx44A St NE Pedestrian ImprovementsWA'12 - - - - 150,000- - - 150,000 cpxxxx45Interurban Trailhead ImprovementsWA'13 - - - - 210,000- - - 210,000 cp112056Lea Hill Safe Routes to School ImprovementsS 25,000373,500- - - - - - 398,500 793,700813,500500,000440,000910,000865,0005,725,000 - 10,047,200 Prelim. Engineering and Misc. Improvements cp076713Mohawk Plastics Site Wetland MitigationN/A 656,00025,00020,00025,00020,00025,00065,000- 836,000 cp11102741st St SE and A St SE Access Management StudyN/A 8,0002,000- - - - - - 10,000 C410A029S 277th Street -Wetland Mitigation N/A 204,00025,00025,00025,000- - - - 279,000 cpxxxx46104th Ave SE & Green River Study N/A 2,0003,000- - - - - - 5,000 cpxxxx47Environmental Park Roadway Improvements StudyN/A - - - - - 5,000- - 5,000 cpxxxx48Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Imp StudyN/A - 10,000- - - - - - 10,000 cpxxxx49S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Imp StudyN/A - 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 cpxxxx54Kersey Way Study N/A - 200,000- - - - 350,000550,000 cp081555Mary Olson Farm Improvements N/A - 1,000- - - - - - 1,000 870,000270,00045,00050,00020,00030,000415,000- 1,700,000 Roadway Preservation Programs cpxxxx28Annual Bridge Maintenance N/A - 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,0 0050,000- 300,000 Varies35Arterial Streets (105 Fund) N/A - 1,300,0001,300,0001,300,0001 ,300,0001,300,0001,300,000- 7,800,000 Varies36Arterial Crack Seal (105 Fund) N/A - 200,000200,000200,000200,000 200,000200,000- 1,200,000 Varies37Local Streets - SOS (103 Fund)N/A - 2,000,0002,000,0002,000,0002 ,000,0002,000,0002,000,000- 12,000,000 - 3,550,0003,550,0003,550,0003 ,550,0003,550,0003,550,000- 21,300,000 17,065,68118,233,00016,231,0289,442,00043,906,02826 ,060,200122,265,70037,910,400273,849,909 Recommended Regional Projects N/A 80SR-167 Expansion (I405-SR509) - WSDOT N/A 81SR-18 & SR-167 Interchange - WSDOT N/A 82 SR-164 Corridor Improvements (SR-18 to Academy Drive) - WSDOT N/A 84 Green River Class I Trail, (SR-18 to Northern City Limit) - King County N/A 8551st Ave S & S 316th St Signal - King County N/A 86North Tapps Corridor Widening (EVH to SR-167) - Pierce County N/A 87Auburn Transit Station Parking Garage-SoundTransit S = Secured PS = Partially Secured WA = Will Apply A = Applied '10 = Year 32,300,000 45,000,000 Cost *Grant Status 2,000,000 650,000 31,600,000 4,572,550,000 Construct Class I Trail along Green River from SR-18 to N orthern City limits.Construct new traffic signal at intersection of 51st Ave S and S 316th St with turn lanes.Subtotal TOTAL Construct corridor improvements consistent with WSDOT SR-164 Corridor Improvement Study. Project includes intersection improvements, roadway widening and roadside improvem ents.Project Description From I-405 to Sr-18, add one NB and SB general purpose l ane; from SR-18 to SR-161, add one NB HOT lane and one SB H OT lane, add direct NB/SB HOV/HOT lane connection ramps between SR-167 & I405 ; add NB and SB auxiliary lanes between SR516 and S 277th Street; extend Sr 167 from SR-161 to SR-509.Complete freeway interchange by adding eastbound SR-18 ra mp to southbound SR-167, adding northbound SR-167 ramp to W B SR-18 and closing SR-18 access to West Valley Highway.TOTAL Construct a new parking garage at the Auburn Transit Statio n Complete a five lane section roadway with new bridge ov er the white river and railroad grade separation from EVH to SR-167.Subtotal Subtotal 61,000,000 4,400,000,000 Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Total Project Cost City of Auburn 2012 - 2017 Transportation Improvement Prog ram Project Summary Project Number TIP #Project Title Project Expenditures Appendix A ACT.A
ACT.A
EDGEWOOD ALGONA KING COUNTY PIERCE COUNTY KENT PACIFIC SUMNER LAKE TAPPS SUPERMALL MUCKLESHOOT CASINO 167 167 18 18 O S T N E P I K E S T N E U S T S E H S T N E N S T N E E V E R G R E E N W A Y S E 1 1 8 T H A V E S E H S T S E L S T N E E A S T B L V D (B O E I N G )Z S T S E F IR ST SE 5 4 T H A V E S W S T N W E S T N E 5 7 T H P L S E G S T N E 5 6 T H A V E S T E R R A C E V I E W L N S E A S T N W S E 3 2 0 T H S T 5 0 T H S T S E 1 2 T H S T S E S E 3 0 4 T H S T 5 1 S T S T S E F R O N T A G E R D S 2 9 7 T H P L A S T E D S T S E 1 0 4 T H A V E S E D S T S E S 2 8 8 T H S T S E 2 9 9 T H S T 6 7 T H S T S E 1 4 4 T H A V E S E P E A R L A V E S E F S T S E P A C I F I C A V E S H S T S E 6 4 T H S T S E 2 2 N D S T N E S E 3 1 6 T H S T P I K E S T N W 1 4 2 N D A V E S E M S T S E G R E E N R I V E R R D S E 5 4 T H A V E S P E R I M E T E R R D S W W E S T B L V D (B O E I N G )3 7 T H S T S E U S T N W C S T N E S T U C K R I V E R D R S E D S T S E C L A Y S T N W S E 3 1 5 T H P L 1 7 T H S T S E 4 2 N D S T N E M S T N W 1 0 5 T H A V E S E 1 0 7 T H P L S E H S T S E 1 0 5 T H P L S E E S T S W S 3 0 0 T H P L S E 2 9 0 T H S T S E 2 9 9 T H S T 1 8 T H S T N E 1 2 6 T H A V E S E 1 2 T H S T S E 8 T H S T S E J S T S E E L M L N S E A S T S W 1 0 9 T H P L S E 6 7 T H L N S E F S T S W 4 6 T H P L S O L I V E A V E S E T S T S E K S T S E 6 T H S T N E 4 3 R D S T N E 4 T H S T S E L S T N E E V E R G R E E N W A Y S E 2 6 T H S T N E 5 1 S T P L N E 1 4 T H S T N E S E 2 9 5 T H S T 1 3 0 T H A V E S E S 2 9 6 T H P L L S T S E 5 1 S T S T N E S E 2 8 8 T H P L 1 1 2 T H A V E S E 5 6 T H A V E S 2 5 T H S T S E I S A A C A V E S E 2 0 T H S T N E 5 7 T H P L S 1 1 6 T H A V E S E 6 1 S T A V E S M D R N E O L I V E A V E S E S E 2 9 6 T H W A Y L S T N E S 2 9 2 N D S T W S T N W K S T N E 2 8 T H S T N E 3 3 R D S T S E 6 6 T H S T S E S E 3 0 4 T H W A Y N S T S E G S T N W T H O M A S A V E S E 5 9 T H S T S E S E 2 9 6 T H S T 4 T H S T N E 2 6 T H S T S E 7 2 N D S T S E 3 2 N D S T S E S 2 9 2 N D S T 1 1 4 T H P L S E T S T S E 3 2 N D S T N E 5 3 R D S T S E 7 3 R D S T S E 6 3 R D P L S E E L M S T S E S 2 9 6 T H S T 5 5 T H A V E S S E 3 1 4 T H P L 5 1 S T S T S E P I K E S T S E 5 6 T H S T S E 2 1 S T S T S E 2 3 R D S T S E 8 T H S T N E 6 3 R D S T S E 5 2 N D P L S 5 0 T H S T N E 1 9 T H D R N E P A N O R A M A D R S E S U P E R M A L L D R S W S K Y W A Y L N S E 1 9 T H P L S E 5 7 T H S T S E 2 4 T H S T N W S 2 9 2 N D S T S E 3 0 7 T H P L 3 0 T H S T N E 2 0 T H S T S E 3 0 T H S T N E S E 3 0 1 S T S T 3 7 T H W A Y S E 1 0 4 T H A V E S E 5 5 T H S T S E 2 7 T H S T S E 6 1 S T S T S E M A P L E D R S E 2 4 T H S T N E 6 5 T H S T S E 6 1 S T A V E S Q U I N C Y A V E S E 2 8 T H S T S E 2 N D S T N W 2 6 T H S T S E L U N D R D S W 2 N D S T S E S E 2 9 8 T H P L S E 2 9 3 R D S T 8 5 T H A V E S S E 3 1 0 T H S T 1 6T H S T SE C S T S E 4 T H S T N E D O G W O O D S T S E 3 R D S T N E 9 T H S T S E 2 N D S T N E K S T N E 4 9 T H S T N E 2 N D S T E 6 4 T H S T S E K S T S E 1 7 T H S T S E M S T N E V S T S E T S T N W V S T S E 3 3 R D S T S E 1 0 7 T H A V E S E O S T N E 1 4 T H S T S E G S T S E 3 3 R D S T S E S 2 9 6 T H S T K S T N E 2 6 T H S T N E S E 2 9 8 T H P L D S T N E 1 6 T H S T S E S E 2 8 8 T H S T 2 N D S T S E E S T S E S E 3 0 4 T H S T E M A I N S T 5 5 T H S T S E 1 1 T H S T N E S 3 1 0 T H S T S E 2 8 8 T H S T 4 2 N D S T N W D O G W O O D D R S E S E 2 9 5 T H S T S 3 3 1 S T S T S 3 1 4 T H S T 2 0 T H S T N W 7 T H S T S E 1 5 T H S T S E A S T N E 15TH ST SE 2 4 T H S T S E D S T S E 1 7 T H S T S E R S T N E B S T N E 5 6 T H A V E S E S T S E 8 T H S T S E D P L S E 3 2 N D P L N E 1 3 T H S T S E S E 2 8 6 T H S T N S T S E 2 2 N D S T S E 2 1 S T S T S E U C T N W 3 2 N D S T S E 2 5 T H S T S E 7 T H S T S E R P L N E 5 6 T H A V E S H S T N W N S T N E K S T N E J S T N E S E 2 8 2 N D S T 1 7 6 T H A V E E S 3 0 0 T H S T 5 T H S T N E 3 1 S T S T S E 3 0 T H S T S E 3 7 T H S T S E S 2 8 8 T H S T 6 5 T H A V E S S E 2 9 7 T H S T S E 3 0 0 T H S T S E 2 8 6 T H P L S 3 2 4 T H S T 4 4 T H S T N W S E 3 0 4 T H S T B P L N W 5 5 T H S T S E 2 1 S T S T S E 4 T H S T S W S 3 0 2 N D P L O ST SE S 3 1 9 T H S T S E 2 8 2 N D S T 1 9 T H S T S E S E 4 3 R D S T 3 0 T H S T N W S E 2 9 7 T H S T S 3 0 3 R D P L S E 3 0 7 T H S T H S T N E S E 2 8 4 T H S T A L P I N E D R S E 4 5 T H S T N E S E 2 8 1 S T S T S E 2 9 0 T H P L S E 4 2 N D S T 2 8 T H S T S E W A R D A V E S E 4 5 T H S T N E O L Y M P I C S T S E J S T S E 6 T H S T N W 5 7 T H S T S E S E 2 8 9 T H S T S 3 1 2 T H S T S E 2 8 5 T H S T 4 2 N D S T N E 2 2 N D W A Y N E 6 9 T H S T S E S E 2 9 4 T H S T 4 7 T H S T S E 2 3 R D S T S E S E 2 9 4 T H P L V S T N W 1 7 T H S T N E 1 6 T H S T N E S E 2 8 6 T H S T S E 3 2 6 T H P L S 3 1 8 T H S T G S T S E E V E R G R E E N W A Y S E R A N D A L L A V E S E 2 2 N D S T S E 2 3 R D S T S E 2 4 T H S T S E 2 5 T H S T S E H E A T H E R A V E S E S E 2 8 2 N D S T 2 1 S T S T N E 3 6 T H S T S E S E 3 1 2 T H W A Y 1 0 2 N D A V E S E 3 7 T H P L S E 2 9 T H S T N W S E 3 0 1 S T S T S E 2 8 7 T H S T 4 7 T H S T S E S E 2 8 4 T H S T H O W A R D R D S E I S T N W 1 4 0 T H A V E S E S 2 8 7 T H S T F O S T E R A V E S E 6 0 T H S T S E 3 5 T H W A Y S E S E 3 2 1 S T P L S E 3 2 3 R D P L K S T S E 1 0 8 T H A V E S E L S T S E S U P E R M A L L W A Y S W C S T S E E A S T B L V D (B O E I N G )B S T S E 1 0 4 T H P L S E M S T N E M O N T E V I S T A D R S E D S T S W 1 0 8 T H A V E S E F S T N E G S T S E D S T S E 1 4 8 T H A V E S E B S T S E I S T S E F S T S E 1 1 1 T H P L S E B S T S E G S T S W T S T N E 1 1 8 T H P L S E M I L L P O N D D R S E 1 1 0 T H A V E S E P E R R Y A V E S E A C A D E M Y D R S E 1 1 2 T H A V E S E G S T S E G P L S E D S T S E H E M L O C K S T S E 1 1 6 T H A V E S E H A Z E L A V E S E 5 9 T H A V E S 6 4 T H A V E S E L M S T S E 5 2 N D A V E S R S T N W V S T N W W E S T B L V D (B O E I N G )G I N K G O S T S E R I V E R D R S E 5 5 T H P L S 1 2 8 T H P L S E 5 7 T H D R S E R S T N W 6 9 T H S T S E E L I Z A B E T H A V E S E 68T H S T S E R I V E R V I E W D R N E S C E N I C D R S E C S T S E R P L S E P I K E S T N E D O G W O O D S T S E V C T S E 1 1 1 T H A V E S E 5 2 N D P L S D S T N E J S T N E L S T N E L S T S E S E 2 9 9 T H P L 5 8 T H A V E S I S T N E D S T S E D S T N W 6 2 N D L O O P S E 1 S T S T N E B R I D G E T A V E S E 1 0 8 T H A V E S E E S T N E 5 8 T H A V E S Q U I N C Y A V E S E L S T S E 5 1 S T A V E S A A B Y D R N W 5 5 T H A V E S H I G H L A N D D R S E C S T N E J S T N E L A K E T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1 S T S T S E B O U N D A R Y B L V D S W E L L I N G S O N R D S W M S T S E M S T S E A S T N E P E A S L E Y C A N Y O N R D S E M E R A L D D O W N S D R N W S E 3 0 4 T H S T M S T N E 1 2 4 T H A V E S E C S T N W 1 5 T H S T N E D S T N W D S T N E R S T S E A U B U R N W A Y N A U B U R N W A Y N 1 1 2 T H A V E S E 5 1 S T A V E S A U B U R N W A Y S 1 5 T H S T S W 1 3 2 N D A V E S E 2 9 T H S T S E 1 3 2 N D A V E S E K E R S E Y W A Y S E 8 T H S T N E W M A I N S T L A K E L A N D H I L L S W A Y S E C S T S W 1 5 T H S T S W A U B U R N A V E N E A S T S E C S T S W A S T S E E A S T V A L L E Y H W Y S E E M A I N S T I S T N E H A R V E Y R D N E B S T N W 1 5 T H S T S W T E R R A C E D R N W 1 5 T H S T N W 3 7 T H S T N W 1 5 T H S T N W A U B U R N -B L A C K D I A M O N D R D S E W E S T V A L L E Y H W Y S 1 7 T H S T S E 4 T H S T S E L A K E T A P P S P K W Y S E O R A V E T Z R D S E S E 2 8 1 S T S T R I V E R W A L K D R S E S 3 1 6 T H S T L E A H I L L R D S E W E S T V A L L E Y H W Y N A S T N W R S T S E 3 7 T H S T N E 3 2 1 S T S T S P E A S L E Y C A N Y O N R D S 2 1 0 T H A V E E S 2 8 8 T H S T A U B U R N W A Y N 9 T H S T E 1 6 T H S T E M I L I T A R Y R D S 5 1 S T A V E S S 2 7 2 N D W A Y M I L I T A R Y R D S M I L I T A R Y R D S A U B U R N -B L A C K D I A M O N D R D S E 2 1 4 T H A V E E F O R E S T C A N Y O N R D E A U B U R N -E N U M C L A W R D S S U M N E R -T A P P S H W Y E 1 8 2 N D A V E E 1 2 T H S T E 1 1 6 T H A V E S E W E S T V A L L E Y H W Y N W S 3 2 8 T H S T E L L I N G S O N R D S W S E 2 7 2 N D S T S E 2 7 2 N D S T W E S T V A L L E Y H W Y S W E A S T V A L L E Y H W Y S E C E N T R A L A V E S S 2 7 2 N D S T 1 2 4 T H A V E S E S T E W A R T R D S E S E 2 7 4 T H S T 3 8 T H A V E S S 2 7 7 T H S T 2 4 T H S T E 6 8 T H A V E S 2 4 T H S T E 8 T H S T E S E K E N T -K A N G L E Y R D 1 4 2 N D A V E E 1 0 8 T H A V E S E J O V I T A B L V D E S 2 7 7 T H S T 2 62 3 18 19 52 87 44 21 8 38 38 51 58 41 15 39 60 64 12 9 4 16 40 14 61 10 42 6 65 1 66 11 5 7 81 84 82 81 80 86 85 86 80 47 47 54 46 49 23 56 24 20 25 43 63 17 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy .Map ID: 3829 Printed On: 11/29/11 City of Auburn 2012 - 2017 Transportation Improveme nt Program (TIP)01,1002,2003,3004,4005,500 FEET Intersection Improvements Non-Motorized Improvements Prelim Eng and Misc Improvements Recommended Regional Projects Roadway Improvements Signal & ITS Projects City of Auburn Parks Water Features Appendix B ACT.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6388 Off-street parking and loading Date: December 8, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Agenda Bill Ordinance No. 6388 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:The Planning and Community Development Committee re commend approval of Ordinance No. 6388 to the full City Council.Background Summary:See attached. Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development Councilmember:Norman Staff:Wagner Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:ACT.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED ACT.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: P roposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to off street parking and loading. (Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1). Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Ordinance No. 6388 Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning and Community Development Committee to r ecommend to the City Council approval of Ordinance No. 6388 Background Summary: The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1, completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s resid ential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates t he City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street parking and landscaping. The Code Update Project is intended to meet four ke y objectives: * Improve development code readability and ease o f use; and * Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development review and quasi-judicial decision process; and * Ensure development code and design standards ar e coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and * Promote sustainability concepts where feasible. Ordinance 6388 will amend Chapter 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading) of the Auburn City Code (ACC). The proposed zoning code text amendments wit hin the ordinance establishes regulations which provide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-st reet parking and loading, will increase the number of shared and reduced parking strategies, allow for al ternative parking surfaces and allow alternative parking layouts subject to approval by the planning director. On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments. At the close of the public hearing the Planning Com mission made a recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the proposed code amendments. Sinc e the public hearing, the code amendments have been reviewed by the Planning and Community Develop ment Committee and the Public Works Committee. Both Committees were satisfied with the amendments proposed. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Information Services Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Norman Staff: Wagner Meeting Date: December 12, 2011 Item Number: ACT.B
DRAFT Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 1 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 8 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 18.52 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to t he City of Auburn zoning code are appropriate, in order to upd ate and better reflect the current development needs and standards of the City; and WHEREAS, a need has been identifi ed to address concerns over the regulations on off-street parking and loading; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinanc e is to establish regulations which provide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-street parking and loading and to ensure that parking areas are compatib le with surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning c ode amendments will increase the number of shared and reduced parking strategies, allow for alternative parking surfaces and allow alternative parking layo uts subject to approval by the planning director; and WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City of Au burn Planning Commission held a public hearing on Oc tober 18, 2011, on the proposed code amendments regarding off-street parking and lo ading, landscaping and screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and WHEREAS, after fully consideri ng the testimony and information presented at the publi c hearing, on October 18, 2011, the Planning Commission ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 2 of 26 made its recommendations for code am endments to the City of Auburn City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has revi ewed and considered the Planning Commission recommendations; and WHEREAS, environmental review on the proposal has been completed in accordance with the requirem ents of the State Environm ental Policy Act (SEPA) with a final determination of non-signifi cance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A .106, the proposed zoning code amendments were sent to the Washi ngton State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review; and WHEREAS, no comments regardi ng the proposed zoning code amendments have been received from the Department of Comm erce or other state agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds t hat the proposed amendments improve the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates te chnical aspects of the code, improves the City’s developm ent review process, and promote sustainability concept s where feasible NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDA IN as follows: ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 3 of 26 Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.52 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows: Chapter 18.52 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Sections 18.52.010 General. Intent. 18.52.015 Applicability. 18.52.020 Required off -street parking – Minimum standards. Number of off-street parking spaces required. 18.52.025 Disabled/Handicapped Parking Requirements. 18.52.030 Reductions of the quantity of required parking. 18.52.040 Drive-in through facilities. businesses . 18.52.050 Off -street parking area development and maintena nce. Parking Design and Development Standards. 18.52.060 Development of off-street parking spaces for single-fa mily dwellings and duplexes. 18.52.065 Commercial vehicl es in resi dential zones. 18.52.070 Off -street parking lots – Location. 18.52.080 Repealed. 18.52.090 Parking space dimensional requirements. 18.52.100 Existing off -street parking reduction. 18.52.110 Fractional spaces. 18.52.120 Parking in front or side yards – Prohibited generally. 18.52.125 Stacked parking. 18.52.130 Off-street loading space. 18.52.135 Alternate parking layouts. 18.52.010 General Intent. This chapter establishes regulations which pr ovide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-street parking and loading and to ensure that par king areas are compatible with surrounding land uses. The City discourages providing parking in excess of that required by this Chapter. 18.52.015 Applicability. Except as otherwise provided in adopted co ntract rezones, developm ent agreements, design standards and guidelines, or similar more specific process, off -street parking and loading provisions of this chapter shall apply as follows: A. New Development. For all buildings or structures erected an d all uses of land (property) established, parking and loading facilities shall be provided as required by this Chapter. B. Change in Use. When the use of any building, structure, or land is changed, increasing the intensity such that the change creates an increa se of five or less parking spaces required by the change, additional off-street park ing spaces need not be provided in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. 1. Special provisions for the RO, Residential Office distri ct: ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 4 of 26 a. Within the RO, Residential Office zoning district, if any existing, nonresidential use is changed to another use, the requirements of this chapter shall apply in full to the new use if and only if the change in parki ng requirements between the old and new uses is greater than two spaces; except that if the app licant submits an alternate parking plan sufficiently justifying that the existing parki ng meets the needs of the new use, the planning director may authorize the satisfaction of parking th rough the Special Exception Process b. Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an existing building within the RO, Residential Office zoning distri ct, the requirements of this Chapter shall apply in full to the new use; except if the structure is being used as both a residence and business, then if the applicant submits an Alter nate Parking Plan sufficiently justifying that the parking meets the needs of both uses, the planning director may authorize the satisfaction of parking through the Special Exception Process. C. Modification to Existing Structures or Us es of Land. Whenever an existing building or structure is modified or uses of land are modifi ed such that the modification would require an increase of more than five off-street parking spaces, additional off-str eet parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of this Chapter. D. Modification to Existing Parking Lots. 1. A. Off -street parking and loading lots shall be provided in accordance with the following provisions of this chapter for every building or use hereafter erected, altered, enlarged, or relocated. 1. Any new building , use or structure shall provide the required parking to the standards specified in this chapter. The provision of additional pa rking is not required for a change of use in existing buildings in the C -2 zoning district. 2. Whenever a new building replaces an existing building or there is an expansion of an existing building within the C -2 zoning district, the requirements of this section shall apply only if there is an incr ease in floor area of 25 percent or more (including the cumulative increase of previous expansions after the effective date (Apr il 1, 1997) of the ordinance amending this sectio n). 3. Any parking lot hereafter physically altered shall comply with all of the provisions of this Chapter, except that such lot which provides five percent of its area in landscaping and the landscaping is healthy and good maintenance shall be deemed to comply with ACC 18.50.06 4 0(H)C(4). 4. Any parcel of land that is used or is intended to be used as a parking area shall b e improved pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. This shall include all parking area , whethe r or not required by this chapter, except as provided in ACC 18.52.060 (A) and (B). 5 2 . For existing parking lots that are resurfaced in exce ss of 50 percent of their area, then at least five percent of the entire parking area shall be landscape d consistent with Chapter 18.50 ACC. 6 3 . If existing parking lots are restriped, then the new layout of the parking spa ces shall be the same as the previous layout or, if changed, then the changed layout shall conform to the existing dimensional requirements of this chapter. B. These regulations shall not be retroactive to include any building or use existing at the time of passage of the ordinance codified in this chapter, except as follows: 1. When a building is located on a different site , there shall be provided off -street parking and loading spaces as required for new buildings . 2. When the number of units is increased by alteration or addi tion to a dwelling or other structure containing sleeping rooms, there shall be provided off -street parking and loading spaces for such additional units. When there are o ther alterations to a residential ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 5 of 26 structure , the requirements of this chapter shall apply whenever the value of such alterations or the cumulative value of previous alterations after the effective date (April 1, 1997) o f the ordinance amending this secti on exceeds 50 percent of the assessed valuation of the structure . 3. When there are alterations or additions to a nonresidenti al building outside the C -2 zoning district, there shall be provided off -street parking and loading spaces for any increase, including any cumulative increase of previous additions or alterations after the effective date (April 1, 1997) of the or dinance amending this section, in the gross fl oor area or number of seats, bowling lanes or clas srooms therein, except that when the aggregate number of spaces required for such alterations or addi tions is five or less, the off -street parking need not be provided. 4. Whenever any existing, nonresiden tial use in a building outside of the C -2 zoning district is changed to another use in the same building , the requirements of this section shall apply in full to the new use if and only if the change in parking requirements between the old and new uses is greater than five spaces. 5. Within the RO district, any existing, nonresidential use is changed to another use , the requirements of this chapter shall apply in full to the new use if and only if the change in parking requirements between the old and new uses is greater than two spaces; except that if the applicant submits an alte rnate parking plan justifying that the existing parking meets the needs of the new use , the planning and development director may authorize through the special exception process. 6. Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an existing building , the requirements of this title shall apply in full to the new use ; except that the hearing examiner by means of a special exception may determine that a portion of the residential structure cannot be effectively utilized by the proposed commercial use and such area then may be excluded from the gross floor area used to compute the parking requirement. 7. Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an existing building within the RO district, the requirements of this title shall apply in full to the new use ; except that the planning and developm ent director by means of a special exception may determine that a portion of the residential structure cannot be effectively utilized by the proposed commercial use and such area then may be excluded from the gross floor area used to compute the parking requirement. 8. Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an existing building within the RO district, the requirements of this title shall apply in full to the new use ; except if the structure is being used as both a residence and business, the planning and development director by means of a special exception may approve a parking plan to meet the parking requirements for both uses . C. The required parking and/or loading shall have reasonable access to a street or alley and a capacity according to the use of the building listed in the following sections. D. Where a use is not listed, the planning director shall determine the number of required parking and/or loading spaces based upon similar uses for which the requirements are specified. E. Removal of required parking and/or loading spaces from practi cal use by obstruction, erection of buildings , or other actions as to reduce the parki ng and/or loading capacity or usefulness thereof below the minimum requirements estab lished in this chapter is prohibited. F. “Gross floor area ” includes all floor area within the ext erior walls of the building including area in halls, storage, and partitions, but excluding furnace and similar utility space used solely to maintain the building for occupancy . G. “Parking area” includes the parking spaces together with driveways and the access to a street. H. “Gross leasable area” is the gross floor area reduced by the area of public lobbies, common mall areas, permanently designated corridors, and atriums or courtyards provided solely for pedestrian or merchandise access to the building from the exterior, and/or for aesthetic ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 6 of 26 enhancement or natural lighting purposes. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6231 § 7, 2009; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.020 Required off -street parking – Minimu m standards. Number of off-street parking spaces required The number of off -street parking spaces shall be determined for Ee ach principal use of the land, building, or structure. For ancillary uses to the princip al use, required parking shall be calculate d the same as for the principal use, or as otherwise provided for in this chapter. shall provide the number of off-street park ing spaces required by this Section. The following standards are not applicable in the DU C, Downtown Urban Center zone; refer to Chapter 18.29 ACC for specific requirements for that zone. A. Parking requirements by land use 1. Minimum number of parking spaces. Each land use shall provide the minimum number of off-street parking spaces required by Table 18.52.020, except where a greater number of spaces are required through a more specific approval proces s such as an administrative use permit or conditional use permit approval. 2. Uses not listed. Where a use is not listed in Table 18.52.020 the planning director shall determine the number of required parking and/or loading spaces. The planning director shall use the requirements in Table 18.52.020 as a gu ide in determining the number of off-street parking spaces required based on the similarity of uses or may consider a parking generation study. B. Maximum number of parking spaces. Except for required parking spaces f or persons with disabilities, spaced provid ed in park and ride lots op erated by a public tran sit agency, spaces for carpools, spaces for electric vehicle charging and spaces wit hin structured parking with 2 or more levels, the maximum number of parking spaces for non-residential uses shall not exceed 125 percent of the minimum spaces required by Table 18.52.020 C. Measurement of floor area. In any case where Table 18.52.020 establishes a parking requirement based on floor area in square feet (for example: 2 spaces per 1,000 square feet (sf) of floor area), the floor area shall be construed to mean gross floor area (Def ACC 18.04.430). D. Use with accessory components. A single use with accessory components shall provide parking for the primary use, and each component. For example, a hotel with a meeting room may be required to provide the parking spaces required by Table 18.52.020 for a hotel (i.e. the guest rooms), and for a meeting room. E. Obstruction. Removal of required parking or loading spaces fr om practical use by obstruction, erection of buildings, or other actions as to reduce the parking or loa ding capacity or usefulness thereof below the minimum requirement s established in this chapter is prohibited. Table 18.52.020 Off-Street Parking Requirements by Land Us e Land Use Type: Unit of Measure: Required Parking Rate (spaces per unit of measure): Residential Categories Single family, detached dwelling, Adult family home Dwelling unit 2.00 ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 7 of 26 Two-family dwelling (duplex) Dwelling unit 2.00 Multifamily dwelling (one and two bedroom units) Dwelling unit 1.50 Multifamily dwelling (three bedroom units or more) Dwelling unit 2.00 Mobile home dwellings 1 Dwelling unit 2.00 Assisted Living Facilities 4 bedrooms 1.00 Plus one space for each two employees Group living (includes supportive housing, boardinghouse) 2 bedrooms 1.00 Commercial Categories Auto, boat, or recreational vehicle sales or leasing, new or used 5,000 square feet of outdoor sales area 1,000 square feet of showroom and service facilities 1.00 1.00 Day-care centers Each 10 children in care 2.00 Eating and drinking establishments 1,000 square feet of floor area10.00 Food retail stores and markets 1,000 square feet of floor are a5.00 Health and Fitness Clubs 1,000 square feet of floor area1 0.00 Hotel or Motel Guest room or rental unit 1.00 Mini-marts and self service gas stations 1,000 square feet of floor area5.00 Mortuaries or funeral homes Seat 2 0.25 Motor vehicle repair and services 1,000 square feet of floor area2.50 Personal service shops 1,000 squa re feet of floor area2.50 Retail commercial establishments, less than 15,000 square feet of floor area 1,000 square feet of floor area2.50 Retail commercial establishments, greater than 15,000 square feet of floor area 1,000 square feet of floor area4.00 Shopping centers 1,000 square feet of floor area4.00 Office Categories Business and professional offices 1,000 square feet of floor area2.00 Medical, dental, and other 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00 ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 8 of 26 doctor’s offices Manufacturing Processing and Warehousing Categories All manufacturing, industrial, and processing uses, except the following: 1,000 square feet of floor area1.00 Warehousing 2,000 square feet of floor area1.00 Storage - Personal storage/mini-storage facilities Storage unit 3 Minimum of 2 spaces Recreation, Education, Public Assembly Categories Auditoriums, stadiums, and theaters Seat 2 0.25 Commercial recreation facilities - Indoor, except for the following: 1,000 square feet of floor area5.00 Bowling alleys Lanes 5.00 Pool and billiard rooms Table 2.00 Skating rinks 1,000 square feet of floor area5.00 Commercial recreation facilities - Outdoor 1,000 square feet of usable recreational area 3.00 Hospitals Bed 1.75 Library, museum 1,000 square feet of floor area2.50 Meeting facility, public or private Seat 2 0.25 Religious assembly Seat 2 0.20 Schools (public and private) Kindergarten schools Employee 4 1.00 Elementary/middle schools Teaching station 1.20 Secondary (high) schools Student 0.40 College or university (including trade and business schools) Student 0.75 Studios (dance, martial arts, etc.) 1,000 square feet of floor area5.00 Tennis/racquetball/handball or other sport courts Court Each 300 sf of floor area for accessory uses. 2.00 1.00 Recreational uses not listed elsewhere Same as retail, based on size ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 9 of 26 Notes: 1. Within mobile home parks, parking space shall not be allowed within the required setbacks. Guest parking shall be provided within the development: 5% of t otal requirement. 2. Seat, 18 inches of bench, or 25 square feet of floor space. 3. Parking shall be provided by parking/driving lanes adjacent to buildings. Two parking spaces shall be provided adjacent to the manager’s quarters. 4. There shall be 2 visitor-parking stalls provided for each 10 requ ired employee stalls A. Residential. 1. Single -family: one park ing space per two bedroom dwelling , two parking spaces per three or more bedroom dwelling ; 2. Two -family (duplex): one and one -half parking spaces per one bedroom and two bedroom living units, tw o parking spaces per three or more bedroom living units; 3. Multifamily: one and one -half parking s paces per one bedroom and two bedroom units, two parking spaces per three or more bedroom units, for developments in excess of 5 0 dwelling units , one screened space for each 10 dwelling units shall be provided for recreational vehicles ; 4. Mobile homes: one parking space per one bedroom and two bedroom units, two parking spaces per three or more bedroom units. Within mobile home parks, par king space shall not be allowed within required setbacks ; recreation and laundry areas shall prov ide off -street parking spaces equal to one per each 10 mobile home sites within the development; 5 . Boardinghouses and lodginghouses: one parking space for the proprietor plus one space per sleeping room for boarders and/or lodging use plus one additional space for each four persons employed on the premises; 6. Fraternities, sororities, and dormitories: one parking space for each four beds; 7. Multifamily dwellings , for the elderly, operated under contract with a pub lic agency or subsidized under a state, local or federal program: one parking space for each four d welling units ; a minimum of four spaces shall be provided. A binding legal agreement must be executed guaranteeing that the dwellings will be used exclusively for this use . The agreement shall be approved by the city attorney and recorded at the appropriate King County office, for propertie s located in King County, or recorded at the appropriate Pierce County office, fo r properties located in Pierce County; 8. Assisted living facility: one parking space per two units, plus one parking space for each two employees; 9. Supportive housing: one space per every two units, either loca ted on site or on an abutting property. Required parking may be reduced up to 25 percent if a supportive housing project is located within 500 feet of public tr ansit, support services and/or retail facilities meeting basic da ily needs. B. Commercial Activities. 1. Auto, boat, or recreational vehicle sales or leasing, new or used: one s pace per 5,000 square feet of outdoor sales area, one space per 1,000 square f eet of showroom and services facilities, and one space per each 250 square feet of offi ce area, but in no case shall there be less than six spaces provided. The outdoor sales area shall be paved in accordance with ACC 18.52.050 (A) and landscaped in accordance with ACC 18.50.060 (H)(1); 2. Repealed by Ord. 5777; 3. Food retail stores and markets: one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area ; a minimum of six parking spaces shall be provided; 4. M ini -marts and self -service gas stations: one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area in addition to pump island spaces; 5. Health and physical fitness clubs: one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area ; 6. Laundry, self -service: one parking space per four washing machines; a minimum of five parking spaces shall be provided; ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 10 of 26 7. Manufactured home sales lots: one space per 5,000 square feet of outdoor sales area, and one space per 250 square feet of office area; 8. Mortuaries or funeral homes: one parking space per four seats in the assembly area, computed as seven square feet of floor area per seat; 9. Motels, motor hotels and hotels: one and one -quarter parking spaces per sleeping unit; 10. Motorcycle and other small engine vehicle sales and serv ice: one space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area of the bui lding and one space for each 1,000 square feet of outdoor sales area. The outdoor sales area shall be paved in accordance with ACC 18.52.050 (A) and landscaped in accordance with AC C 18.50.060 (H)(1); 11. Motor vehicle repair and services: one parking space per 400 square feet of gross floor area ; a minimum of three spaces shall be provided; 12. Offices, includ ing professional and business, banks and related activities: o ne space per 300 square feet of gross floor area . Up to 400 square feet of unfinished basement floor area used exclusively for storage may be excluded from the parking requirement. “Unfinished basement floor area ” is defined as any floor level, below the first story of a building , which floor level is not provided sufficient light, ventilation, exit facilities, or sanitary facilities, as required for any legal occupancy classification. (See subsection D of this sect ion for doctors’ offices and clinics, etc.); 13. Personal service shops: one parking space per 400 square feet of gross floor area ; a minimum of two shall be provided; 14. Restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and lounges: one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area ; 15. Shopping centers: one parking space per 250 square feet of gross leasable floor area ; 16. Video arcades: within a range of one space per three video machines and one space per one machine as may be determined appropriate by the planning director , considering availability of existing parking, the nature of relate d business, and expected clientele of the arcade ; 17. Other retail establishments, including but no t limited to appliances, bakeries, dry cleaning, furniture stores, hardware stores, household equi pment service shops, clothing or shoe repair shops: one parking space per 500 s quare feet of gross floor area ; 18. Private lodges, with no over night boarding facilities: one park ing space per 100 square feet of gross floor area . C. Industrial and Manufacturing Activities. 1. Manufacturing, research and testing laboratories, creameries, bot tling establi shments, bakeries, canneries, printing, and engraving shops: one parking space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area ; 2. Warehouse and storage: Building Size Parking Requirements Up to 20,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. (3 minimum) 20,001 to 100,000 sq. ft. 1 per 2,500 sq. ft. (10 minimum) 100,000 sq. ft. and up 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. (40 minimum) 3 . Uncovered outdoor storage areas, which are incidental and subordinate to a principal use that otherwise meets the parking requirem ents, need not provide additional parking; 4. Office space shall provide parking as required for offices. D. Medical Facilities. 1. Convalescent, nursing and health institutions: one parking space for each employee per employee shift, plus one s pace for each three beds; 2. Hospitals: two parking spaces for each bed, plus parking for nonhospital space computed as determined elsewhere in this section; ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 11 of 26 3. Medical, dental, and other doctors’ office s: one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area . E. Public Assembly and Recreation. 1. Assembly halls, auditoriums, stadiums, sports arenas, and community clubs: one parking space per three fixed seats; where fixed seats consist of pews or benches, the seating capacity shall be computed upon not less than 18 linear inches of pew or bench length per seat. Where movable chairs are provided, each seven square fee t of the floor area to be occupied by such chairs shall be considered as a seat; 2. Bowling alleys: five spaces per bowling lane, additional parking for food and beverage on same premises shall be required as per subsection (B)(14) of this section and for spectator or assembly seating as per subsection (E)(1) of this section; 3. Churches: one parking space per five seats ; in computing seating capacity and requirements for assembly area without seats, use requirements as set forth for assembly halls per subsection (E)(1) of this section; 4. Danc e halls: one parking space per 100 square feet of gross floor area ; 5. Libraries and museums: one parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area ; 6. Miniature and/or indoor golf: one parking space per hole; 7. Parks: as determined by the planning director and/or hearing examiner on an i ndividual basis; 8. Skating rinks: one parking space per 400 square feet of gross floor area . F. E ducational Activities. 1. Elementary and junior high schools: one and one -half parking spaces for each classroom or teaching station; 2. High schools: one parking space for each employee, plus one parking space for each eight students; 3. School auditoriums, stadiums and spo rts arenas: see requirements as set forth in subsection (E)(1) of this section; 4. Colleges and universities: upon review by planning director and hearing examiner; 5. Nursery s chools and daycare centers: one parking space for each employee plus loading and unloading areas; 6. Business and/or beauty schools: one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area . G. Other Uses . For uses not specifically identified in this chapter, parking shall be provided as spec ified for the use which, in the opinion of the planning director , is most similar to the use under consideration. (Ord. 6167 § 4, 2008; Ord. 6140 § 2, 2007; Ord. 6071 § 3, 2007; Ord. 5777 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5556 § 1, 2001; Ord. 5170 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4304 § 1 (40), (41), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.025. Disabled/Handicapped P Parking Requirements A. Accessible parking spaces for the handicapped/disabled shall b e provided in compliance with the International Building Code (IBC), t he Federal Accessibility Guidelines, and Washington Administrative Code, as applicable. These spac es shall count towards fulfilling the off-street parking requirements of this Chapter. B. Accessible car and van parking space size shall be as follows: 1. Car parking spaces shall be eight feet (96 inches) minimum in width. 2. Van parking spaces shall be 11 f eet (132 inches) minimum in width. Exception: Van parking spaces shall be permitted to be eight feet (96 inches) minimum in width where the adjacent access aisle is eight feet (96 inches) minimum in width. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 12 of 26 Table 18.52.025 – Accessible Parking Spaces Required Total Parking Spaces Provided Minimum Number of Accessible Spaces 1 to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to 75 3 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to 200 6 201 to 300 7 301 to 400 8 401 to 500 9 501 to 1,000 2% of total More than 1,000 20, plus one for each 100 over 1,000 18.52.030 Reductions of the quantity of required parkin g. Except within the DUC zone, reductions of the quantity of required parking may be allowed based upon the following provisions in Table 18.52.030 Parking Quantity Reductions Table 18.52.030 Parking Quantity Reductions 1. Joint Use of Parking Facilities A reduction in the total number of required parking spaces may be allowed wh en two or more uses with different peak parking demands will share a parki ng facility. In order for the reduction to occur the planning director must determine, based on satisfactory evidence provided by the applicant, that there is no substantial conflict in the principal operating hours and no subs tantial conflict in peak parking demand of the uses for which the s haring of parking is proposed. To evaluate the peak parking demand char acteristics or differences in hours and/or days of operation, evidenc e including, but not limited to, a description of the uses and their operational characteristics, and a development plan shall be provided by the applicant and accompany the request. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 13 of 26 If approved, a binding agreement pr oviding for the shared use of parking areas shall be executed by the parties involved, and must be filed with the City in a form approv ed by the planning director and be recorded. Shared parking privileges w ill continue in effect only as long as the agreement, binding on all parties, remains in force. Agreements must guarantee l ong-term availability of the parking, commensurate with the use served by the parking. If a shared parking agreement lapses or is no longer valid, then parking must be provided as otherwise required by this chapter. 2. Reduction of parking for a use with low parking demand A reduction of up to 50 percent of the total number of required parking allowed for the re-use of an existing building, based on quantitative information provided by the applicant that documents the nee d for fewer spaces (eg. sales receipts, documentation of customer frequency, information on parking standards required for the prop erty land use by other cities). In order for the reduction to occu r the planning director must find, satisfac tory evidence has been provided by the applicant, 3. Mixed Occupancies and Shared Uses In the case of two or mo re principal uses in the same building, the total requi rements for off-street parking facilities shall be 75 percent of the sum of the re quirements for the principal uses computed separately. In order for a use to be considered a separate principal use under the terms of this section, the uses must be physically and managerially sep arated in a manner which clearly sets the principal uses apart as separate businesses or operations. Various activities associated wit h single businesses shall not be considered separate uses. 4. Transit Access A reduction in the total number of required parking spaces may be reduced by 25 percentage for sites located within a ¼ mile (wa lking distance) of a public transit stop. A public transit stop inclu des but is not limited to a bus stop, commuter train stop, or park and ride lot. Applicants requesting this reduction must provide a map identif ying the site and transit service schedules for all transit routes within ¼ mile of the site. 5. Trip Reduction Plan A reduction of up to 25 percent in the total number of requ ired parking spaces may be allowed for a business or other use that creates a nd implements a site-specific Trip Reduction Plan and Program. The Trip Reduction Plan and Program shall be reviewed and approved by th e City and yearly reports shall be prov ided to evaluate the effectiveness of the program and ensure its continued maintenance and opera tion. 6. Credit for On-street Parking – Non-residential All multi-family uses and non-residential uses located adjacent to a public right-of-way where on-street parking is permitted may rece ive credit for one off-street parking sta ll for each 22 linear feet of abutting ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 14 of 26 right-of-way for parallel parking, ex cluding curb cuts. This provision shall be applied for on-street parking on the same side of t he street as the proposed land use. All parking for employees must be provi ded on-site. 7. Valet Service 1. For public assembly and recreational uses , hospitals, restaurants, funeral homes and other uses requiring more than 500 parking spaces , an applicant may be allowed to provide less t han the number of required spaces if valet parking is to be used . A reduction of up to 25 percent in the amount of required parking per Table 18.52.020 of as high as 25 percent may be permitted, depending on the size and type of the use if approved by the planning director. 2. The applicant may be required to provide a proof of future parking plan which shows the location for all minimum required parking spaces in conformance with applicable setback requirements. The cit y may require installation of some or all of the addit ional spaces whenever a need arises. The parking study and the proof of future parkin g plan must be approved by the planning director. A binding legal a greement guaranteeing the provisions of this section shall be approved by the city attorney and executed and recorded at the appropriate offices of King County for properties located in King County, or recorded a t the appropriate offices of Pierce County for properties located in Pierce County. (Ord. 6071 § 4, 2007; Ord. 5556 § 1, 2001; Ord. 5170 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) and the project location as shown in the following tabl e: C -2 Zone Citywide Waiver of parking requirement for change of use or if addition is smaller than 25% of floor area (ACC 18.52.010(A)(1) and (2)) Yes No Waiver of parkin g requirement for change of use or additions if five or less spaces (ACC 18.52.010 (B)(3) and (4)) N/A Yes 25% reduction of required parking (ACC 18.52.030 (A)(1)(a)), with an additional 15% reduction (for a total of 40%) if located within a spec ified area (ACC 18.52.030 (A)(1)(b)) Yes No Multifamily residential use – One space per dwelling unit (ACC 18.52.030(A)(2)) Yes No Joint use of parking (ACC 18.52.030(B)) No Yes M ixed occupancies and shared uses (ACC 18.52.030 (C)) No Yes ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 15 of 26 C -2 Zone Citywide Reduced parking demand study (ACC 18.52.030 (D)) Yes Yes Valet parking (ACC 18.52.030 (E)) Y es Yes B. Joint Use of Parking Facilities. 1. 2. Calculation of Shared Parking Requirements. When joint use of parking facilities is proposed, the number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following procedure: a. Multiply the minimum parking requiremen t for each individual use as provided in ACC 18.52.020 by the appropriate percentag e listed in the table below for each of the five designated time periods; b. Sum each of the five vertical columns for the table; c. The minimum parking requirement is giv en by the highest sum resulting from subsection (B)(2)(b) of this section. Calculat ion of Shared Parking Requirements Weekdays Weekends Uses Night Midnight 6:00 a.m. Day 9:00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. Evening 6:00 p.m. Midnight Day 9:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Evening 6:00 p .m. 4:00 a.m. Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% Office/Industrial 5% 100% 10% 10% 5% Commercial/Retail (non -office) 5% 70% 90% 100% 70% Hotel/Motel 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% Restaurant (non -fast food) 10% 50% 100% 50% 100% Entertainment/Recreation (theate rs, bowling alleys , etc.) 10% 40% 100% 80% 100% Churches 5% 10% 30% 100% 80% All others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 3. The provisions in this subsection B of this section shall not result in a reduction of more than 25 percent from the requirements which would apply in the absence of this subsection. These provisions shall not be applied in addition to the parking reduction for downtown (subsection (A)(1) of this section). 4. This provision shall o nly apply to residential uses within the commercial zoning districts. 5. The off -street parking facilities to be used jointly shall be located within a walking distance of 500 feet of the use whi ch they are to serve. 6. Reductions for the joint use of existing parking facilities may be allow ed where there has been a change in use of the existing building that reduced the parking requirem ents. Documentation of the change in use , the reduced parking requirement, the number of excess spaces and the analysis of subsections (B)(1) and (B)(2) of this section must be submitted to the planning director for approval. 7. The concerned parties shall execute a binding legal agreement for as long as the joint use of parking is proposed. The agreement shall be nonre vocable, and written such that ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 16 of 26 if the joint use parking becomes unavailable, then subs titute parking meeting all of the requirements of this chapter must be provided or the use must be discontinued. The agreement shall be approved by the city attorney and recorded at the app ropriate King County office for properties located in King County, or recorde d at the appropriate Pierce County office for properties located in Pierce County. C. D. Reduced Parking Demand Study. 1. An applicant may be allowed to provide less than the required parking spaces by submitting a parking study that descr ibes how parking demand can be met with a reduced parking requirement. Reasons for reducing the parking requ irement under this section may include, but are not limited to: (a) unique characteristics of the use , (b) location adjacent to transit facilities, or (c) adoption of an approved transportation demand management plan. 2. The applicant shall provide a proof of future parking plan which shows the lo cation for all minimum required parking spaces in conformance with all applicabl e requirements. These areas shall be set aside and landscaped or treated in such a manner so t hat they may not be used for parking. The city may require installation of some or all of the addition al spaces whenever a need arises. If the owner fails to compl y, the city may undertake the installation. A bond shall be secured for a five -year period to cover the costs of converting those spaces to parking. The value of the bond shall be determined by the planning director based upon the cost of installing the initial parking area . 3. The parking study and the proof of future parking plan must be approved by the planning director . A binding legal agreement guaranteeing the provisions of this section shall be approved by the city attorney and executed and recorded at the appropriate King County office for properties in King County, or recorded at the appropriate Pierce County office for proper ties located in Pierce County. E. 18.52.040 Drive-through in facilities businesses . All banks, savings and loan associations, food dispensing establishments, and other businesses which maintain drive-through in facilities which are intended to serve customers who remain in their motor vehicles during business transactions, or are designe d in such a manner that customers must leave their automobiles tempor arily in a driving lane located adjacent to the facility, shall provide on-site stacking space for the stacking of motor vehicles as follows: A. Stacking Space. The drive-through in facility shall be so located that sufficient stacking space is provided to accommodate for the handling of types of motor vehicles using such facility during peak business hour s of such a facility. B. Driveway Location. The locati on of entrances and exits shall be determined by the city engineer. C. Shopping Centers. When located in a shopping center, drive-through in facilities shall provide sufficient stacking space to handle peak business deman ds and shall not in any way obstruct the normal circulation pattern of the shopping center and not unreasonable interfere with non-motorized circulation . (Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.050 Off -str eet parking area development and maintenance.Parking Design, and Development, and Maintenance Standards Required parking areas shall be designed, constructed and ma intained in compliance with this Section: A. Location of parking. Off-street pa rking areas shall be located as follows: ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 17 of 26 1. Residential parking. Residential parking shall be located on the same site as each residential dwelling unit served; except for a mixed-use development as defined by ACC 18.04.625. No required residential parking spac e shall occupy any unimproved area within the required front setback, or side and rear setb ack, except as allowe d by ACC 18.52.050 E – Surfacing of Parking Areas, 2. Non-residential parking. Non-residential parking shall be located on the same site as the use served, or off-site. If parking is to be located off-site it is subject to the following requirements: a. The lot or area to be utilized for parking shall be legally encumbered by an easement or other appropriat e means to ensure continuous use of the parking facilities following the procedure contained in Table 18.52.030 (1) Joint Use o f Parking Facilities. b. Whenever required parking facilities are located off-site, sidewalks, or an approved pedestrian facility, shall be provided connecting the satellite parking facility to the development being served. B. Access to parking. Access to parking shall be provided as follow s for all parking areas other than for individual single family dwellings and dup lexes. 1. The location, design and construction of entra nces and exits from the street right-of-way shall be determined by the city engineer. 2. A commercial or industrial use shall have access driveways from the public or private street that are not intersected by a parking aisle, parking space, or another access driveway for a minimum distance of 40 feet from the street right-of-way, to provide a queuing area for vehicles entering and exiting the parking area. The city engineer ma y require a greater distance for uses with high vehicle trip generation or located along heavily-traveled, city des ignated arterial streets. C. Access to adjacent sites. The City may require that the design of a parking area to provide vehicle and pedestrian connections to parkin g areas on adjacent properties or to connect with adjoining public walkways (when a reciprocal access easeme nt is available or can reasonably be provided). D. Parking stall and aisle dimensional standards. 1. Minimum dimensions. Each parking space and parking lot aisle shall comply with the minimum dimension requirements in Table 18.52.050 an d further displayed in Figure 18.52.050. Table 18.52.050 Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimens ions Parking Stall Type Minimum Stall Dimensions Minimum Width for Drive Aisle with Parking(c) Width(a) Length(b) One-Way Two-Way Standard parallel 9 ft. 22 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. Standard 45-degree 9 ft. 19 ft. 15ft. 20 ft. Standard 60-degree 9 ft. 19 ft. 18 ft. 20 ft. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 18 of 26 Standard 90-degree 9 ft. 19 ft. 20 ft. 24 ft. Compact 8 ft. 16 ft. 20 ft. 22 ft. Figure 18.52.050 - Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimen sions 2. Compact parking. Compact spaces may be allowed within a parking lot up to a maximum of 30 percent of the total number of spaces. This maximum percentage can be increased to 50 percent when approval is ob tained by the planning director following the procedures contained in ACC 18.52.135. Alternat ive Parking Layouts. Compact spaces can be clustered or dispersed throughout the parking lot. Every compact parking space created pursuant to this section shall be clearly identified as such by pa inting the word “COMPACT” in upper case block letters, using white paint, on the pavement wi thin the space or through the use of signage. 3. Vehicle Overhang. Vehicular overhang of up to two feet is permitted, provided no vehicle shall overhang into a sidewalk or walkway which wou ld reduce the unencumbered width of a sidewalk or walkway to less than four f eet. A vehicle is permitted to overhang into a landscaped area by two feet; provi ded, that the required landscape area of trees and shrubs are not reduced in quantity and not subject to potential dama ge. E. Surfacing of parking areas. Areas used for parking on private property, including interior driveways and access to a public street, shall be paved with asphalt concrete, cement concrete pavement, or pervious pavement and shall have appropriate bumper guards where needed. Paving is not required for temporary parking fac ilities that have obtained a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to the requirements of ACC 18.46A – Temporary Uses; ho wever dust mitigation is required. Where a driveway crosses an improved public right-of-way, it shall be constructed with cement concrete. All pavement sections shall be designed to support the post development traffic loads anticipated due to the intended use as approved by the city engineer. 1. Alternative paving systems may be provided subject to the approval of the City. The alternative must provide results equivalent to paving. 2. For parking areas serving single-family dwellings and duplexes when located on individual lots, this section shall apply: a. Each off-street parking space shall be connected to an improved street or alley by a driveway a minimum of 11 feet in width ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 19 of 26 b. Not more than 50 percent of the front yard or 800 square feet, whichever is smaller, can be used as off-street parking surfac e. For the purposes of calculating the allowable area under this section, the front yard shall be the area between the right-of-way and the portion of the single-family dwelling’s front facade farthest from the right-of-way. The width of the front yard shall extend to each side property line. c. Driveways that exclusively serve non-required off-street parking spaces are also subject to the surfacing requirement. d. Off street vehicle parking spaces, including those for trai lers, recreational vehicles, and boats on trailers, that are provi ded in addition to those required pursuant to ACC Table 18.52.020 shall be paved with one the surfaces listed above (Section 18.52.050 E), or gravel provided, that weeds, mud or other fine mate rial do not work their way to the surface of the gravel; and provided, that loose gravel is contained on the subject property. e. Boats not on trailers shall not be stored in the front yard. F. Grades of access driveway s. The grade of access driveway s for off-street parking areas shall be subject to the driveway regulations c ontained in Chapter 10.04 of the Engineering Design Standards. G. Sidewalks or pedestrian walkways . Sidewalks or pedestrian walkways shall be visibly marked with differentiated pavement or other met hods such as reflective/LED markers, double row of landscaping, or raised pavement. H. Landscaping. See Chapter 18.50 ACC. I. Lighting. See Chapter 18.53 ACC . Every parcel of land hereafter used as a public or private off -street parking area shall be developed and maintained as follows: A. The parking areas on private property, including interior drive ways and access to a public street, shall be paved with asphalt concrete or cement concrete pavement and shall have appropriate bumper guards where needed. Where a driveway crosses an impro ved public right -of -way, it shall be constructed with cement concrete. All pavemen t sections shall be designed to support the post development traffic loads antici pated due to the intended use as approved by the city engineer. For properties within the RO district converting from single -family residential to a nonresidential use, alternative pervious surfaces may be utiliz ed as approved by the city engineer. Required ADA parking space(s) shall meet all current ADA standards pursuant to current state require ments. B. Parking areas shall be used for vehicle par king only, with no sales, unless permitted elsewhere by this title, dead storage, repair work, or dismantl ing of any kind. C. If lighting is provided, it shall be hooded, shielded, d irected downward and not exceed one -half foot -candle at the property line. D. Drainage facilities for storm water are required and shall b e approved by the public works department. E. Ingress and egress shall be approved as to location and design by the public works department . F. A six -inch extruded concrete curb shall be provided around landscaped i slands, peninsulas or similar features. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 20 of 26 G. Driveways and parking stalls shall be clearly marked. Driveways or aisles that serve emergency access shall have a 20 -foot minimum width, an unobstructed vertical clearance of at least 13 feet six inches (see IFC), and be clearly marked. H. Landscaping: see Chapter 18.50 ACC. I. Sidewalks or pedestrian walkways shall be visi bly marked with striping or differentiated pavement. J. For parking lots in excess of 50 spaces, the design shall be approved by the city engineer and the planning director. Designs shall be reviewed for dimensional and landscaping requirements, drainage, pavement, pedestrian amenities, circula tion, arterial access and qu euing and driveway locations, bicycle parking location, lighting an d signage. K. The maximum grade of driveways should be no more than 12 percent. Grades of up to 15 percent may be allowed upon approval by t he city engineer and the planning director. A lan ding approach area shall be provided with a grade not excee ding eight percent. (Ord. 6231 § 7, 2009; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.060 Development of off -street parking spaces for single -family dwellings and duplexes. For parking areas serving single -family dwellings and duplexes, this section shall apply in l ieu of ACC 18.52.050. A. For those off -street parking spaces required purs uant to ACC 18.52.020(A)(1), the following standards shall apply: 1. Off -street parking spaces for single -f amily dwellings and duplexes on lots located in all zones except the R -R zone shall be paved with asphalt co ncrete or cement concrete. Each off -street parking space shall be connected to an impr oved street or alley by a driveway a minimum of 11 feet in wid th which shall be paved with asphalt concrete or cement concret e. 2. Off -street parking spaces for single -family dwellings on separate lots in the R -R zone may have an all weather surface. Each off -street parking space shall be connected to an improved str eet by a driveway which may have an all weather surface. The construction of the all weather surface shall be determined by the city engineer. The driveway approach, to a paved street, shall be paved and be at least 11 feet wide and 30 feet in length. 3. T he pavement width of a driveway to serve a single -family or duplex parking area shall be a minimum of 11 feet. If the driveway is a desig nated fire lane, the pavement width shall be at least 20 feet and have an unobstructed ve rtical clearance of at least 1 3 feet, six inches (UFC 902.2.2.1). B. Off street vehicle parking spaces, including those for trailers, recreational vehicles, and boats on trailers, that are provided in addition to those required pursuant to ACC 18.52.020(A)(1) shall meet the following s tandards: 1. Off -street parking spaces located in the front yard of lots located in all zones except the R -R (rural residential) zone shall hav e one of the following surfaces: a. Asphalt concrete or cement concrete pavement; or b. Gravel; provided, that we eds, mud or other fine material do not work their way to the surface of the gravel; and provided, that loose gr avel is contained on the subject property; or c. Any other materials including pavers or perm eable surfaces including grasscrete that are approve d by the city and that maintain a durable uniform surface. 2. Driveways that exclusivel y serve nonrequired off -street parking spaces are also subject to the surfacing requirement. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 21 of 26 3. Boats not on trailers shall not be stored in the front yard. C. Off -stree t parking, whether required or not required by the code, sha ll be subject to the following: 1. Single -Family Dwellings. a. Not more than 50 percent of the front yard or 800 square feet, whichever is smaller, can be off -street parking surfac e. However, exce pt as provided for in subsection (D)(2) of this section, in no instance shall a single -family dwelling be limited to le ss than 400 square feet of off -street parking surface in the front yard. For the purpose s of calculating the allowable area under this se ction, the front yard shal l be the area between the right -of -way and the portion of the single -family dwelling's front faca de farthest from the right -of -way. The width of the front yard shall extend to each side property line. b. On properties facing on tw o or more public rights -of -way, the total off -street parking surfaces for all front yards shall not be greater than 800 square feet. Exceptions may be considered pursuant to subsection (D)(1) of this section. 2. Duplexes. a. Not more than 50 percent of the front yard, or 1,600 square feet, whichever is smaller, can be off -street parking surface. However, except as provided for in subsection (D)(2) of this section, in no instance shall a duplex be limited to less than 800 square feet of off -street parking su rface in the front yard. For the purposes of calculating th e allowable area under this section, the front yard shall be the area between the right -of -way and the portion of the duplex's front facade farthest from the right -of -way. The width of the front ya rd shall extend to each side property line. b. On properties facing on two or more public rights -of -way, the total off -street parking surfaces for all front yards shall not be greater than 1,60 0 square feet. Exceptions may be considered pursuant to subsect ion (D)(1) of this section. D. The planning director may administratively revi ew and consider approving alternative off -street parking surfacing layouts to address the following: 1. Unique front -yard configurations including, but not limited to, panhan dle lots, cul -de -sac lots, corner lots, nonconforming development situations or situations where on -street parking on the block does not exist. 2. Situations where the minimum allowable square footage iden tified in subsections (C)(1)(a) and (2)(a) of this sect ion equals or exceeds the allowable area for off -street parking. In such instances, the planning director shall review and consider approving an alternative proposal to avoid surfacing of the entire front yard for off -street parking purposes. (Ord. 5913 § 1, 2005; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.065 Commercial vehicles in residential zones. A. No person shall park any commercial vehicle on any property within the following zoning districts in the city: Residential Zones R5, R7, R10, R16, and R20 (R -1) single -family residential, (R -2) single -family residential, (R -3) duplex residential, (R -4) multiple -family residential, (LHR1) single -family residential, (LHR2) single -family residential, (LHR4) multiple -family residential, and (PUD) planned unit development. B. No person shall park more than one commercial vehicle on any property within the R1 Residential Zone single -family residential (R -S ) zoning district in the city, and no person shall ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 22 of 26 park more than two commercial vehicles on any property within the rural residential (R -R) Residential Conservancy RC zoning district in the city. C. It shall be a defense to a violation of this section that during the entire time that the vehicle was parked in the residentia l neighborhood the operator of the vehicle was actively engaged in making a delivery or providing services to residents in the immediate vicinity of where the vehicle was parked. (Ord. 6019 § 2, 2006.) 18.52.070 Off -street parking lots – Location. The fo llowing provisions shall apply in all zoning distri cts except the DUC zone: A. Single -family dwellings: required parking shall be located on the same lot as the building it is to serve. B. Multifa mily dwellings: required parking may be on a contiguous lot in the same zone if located within a walking distance of 500 feet of dwelling units . The lot shall be legally encumbered by an easement or other appropriate means to ensure continuous use of the parking facilities. Documentation shall require review and approval of the city attorney. C. Other uses: may be in areas other than on th e premises if the required amount of parking area is set aside for a particular use in such a lot , and such area is located within a walking distance of 500 feet from the premises and is in the same zone as the use . The lot or area to be utilized shall be legally encumbered by an easement or ot her appropriate means to ensure continuous use of the parking facilitie s. Documentation shall require review and approval of the city attorney. D. Whenever required parking facilities are located off -site, sidewalks, or an approved pedestrian facility, shall be provided connecting the satellite parking fa cility to the development being served. If lighting is provided, it shall be hooded, shielded, directed downward and not exceed on e -half foot -candle at the property line. E. A permit may be issued by the hearing examiner pursuant to the hearin g requirements of ACC 18.70.040 whenever parking is to be located at a walk ing distance greater than 500 feet from the use , or whenever parking for a use in a commercial or industrial zone is to be located in a residential zone if it is found that: 1. The required parking cannot be provided as required in subsections B and C of this section; 2. There is ad equate access provided between the parking area and the use ; 3. The character of the adjoining lan d uses would not be disrupted by the increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic; 4. The design and configuration of the parking area is compatible with adjacent uses . F. The planning director may authorize parking for a use to be located in a different zone (except as provided for in ACC 18.52.070 (E)) if the director makes the same findings as listed in ACC 18.52.070 (E). (Ord. 6071 § 5, 2007; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 43 04 § 1(42), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.080 Off-street parking – In-lieu of fees. Repealed by Ord. 4949. (Ord. 4688 § 2, 1994.) 18.52.090 Parking space dimensional requirements. A. Stan dard Sized Parking Spaces . 1. Standard sized parking spaces parallel to the driveway or aisle serv ing them shall be a minimum of nine feet wide and 22 feet long. Driveways or aisles serving standard sized parallel spaces shall be a minimum of 12 feet wide. 2. Standard sized parking spaces oriented at an angle to the driveway or aisle serving them shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional requirements set f orth by the following table, and further defined by subsection C of this section; provided, that aisle widths shall not be less than 10 feet. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 23 of 26 One -Way Two -Way A B C D D 30 9.0' 17.3' 12.0' 20.0' 45 9.0' 19.8' 15.0' 20.0' 60 9.0' 21.0' 18.0' 20.0' 90 9.0' 19.0' 24.0' 24.0' B. Compact Sized Parking Spaces . 1. In any off -street parking lot up to 30 percent of the spaces may be designated as “compact” spaces and be developed according to the minimum dimen sional requirements for compact spaces establis hed under this section. Municipally owned/leased automobile parking faci lities may designate up to 50 percent of the spaces as “compact.” 2. In the RO district, all parkin g spaces may be compact, except the required handicap space shall meet the current ADA standards. 3. Compact sized parking spaces oriented parallel to the driveway or aisle serving them shall be a minimum of eight feet wide and 20 f eet long. Driveways or aisles serving comp act sized parallel parking spaces shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 4. Compact sized parking spac es oriented at an angle to the driveway or aisle serving them shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional requirements set f orth by the following table and further defined by subsection C of this section; provided, that aisle widths shall not be less than 10 feet. One -Way Two -Way A B C D D 30 8.0' 14.9' 10.0' 20.0' 45 8.0' 17.0' 13.0' 20 .0' 60 8.0' 17.9' 16.0' 20.0' 90 8.0' 16.0' 22.0' 22.0' 5. Every compact parking space created pursuant to this section shall be clearly identified as such by painting the word “COMPACT” in upper ca se block letters, using white paint, on the pavement within the space. The addi tional use of signs to identify any large blocks of compact parking spaces is encouraged. Th e random distribution of compact spaces or blocks of compact spaces throughout a parking lot is also encouraged. 6. Existing parking lots may provide for compact parking spaces under the provisions of this section; provided, that the parking lot shall comply with all provisions of this chapter except that any parking lot which provides five percent of its area in landscaping shall be deemed to comply with all landscaping requirements. C. When determining the minimum dimensional requirements for standard and compact parking spaces oriented at an angle to the driveway or aisle serving them, t he following figure shall be consulted. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 24 of 26 D. Off -street parking lots shall comply with the handicapped parking space requirements. E. Overhang parking may be permitted. 1. The overhang area need not be paved but must be landscaped with deciduous t rees planted 30 feet on center and groundcover or sodded lawn provided. The trees shall be planted to avoid conflict with the vehicles. No overhang landscape areas, created excl usively for overhang parking, shall be considered to meet the landscape requirements of this title. The overhang land scape area must be a minimum width of five feet; however, th e maximum overhang allowed into the landscaped area shall be two feet. Overhangs into otherwise required landscaped areas are not permitted unless the width of the landscaped ar ea is increased by at least two feet and the plant material increased accordingly. 2. All parking spaces with overhangs shall have appropriate wheel stops provided. (Ord. 6231 § 8, 2009; Ord. 5733 § 4, 2003; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1 997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.100 Existing off -street parking reduction. Existing off -street parking facilities shall not be eliminated nor reduced to an amount less than that required for new buildings unless the facility or the associated use meets the requirements of any of the provisions of ACC 18.52.030 . (Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.110 Fractional spaces. When units or measurements determining the number of requi red parking spaces result in requirements of a fractional space, any fraction up to one-ha lf shall be disregarded, and fractions of one-h alf or over shall require one parking space. (Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.120 Parking in front or side yards – Prohibited generally. On any lot in any R -R, R -S, R -1, R -2, R -3, and R -4 district, the off -street parking and loading space required by this chapter shall not be provided in the required front or side yard area except as otherwise specified in this chapter. (Ord. 4949 § 1, 199 7; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.125 Stacked parking. Stacked parking, i.e., parking one car behind an other, is permitted for funeral homes, single-family homes on individual lots , and for designated employee parking within the RO, Resi dential Office district only, unless the use has complied with the requirement s of ACC Table 18.52.030 ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 25 of 26 Parking Quantity Reductions (Valet Service) 18.52.030 (E ). (Ord. 6231 § 9, 2009; Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997.) 18.52.130 Off-street loading space. Buildings devoted to retail trade, retail and whol esale food markets, warehouses, supply houses, wholesale and manufacturing trade, hotels, hospitals, laundry, dry cleaning establi shments or other buildings where large amounts of goods are received or ship ped shall provide lo ading and unloading space on the same premises as the building as follows: A. Buildings of 6,000 square feet or more of floor area, one off-street loading and unloading spa ce plus one additional off-street loading space for each 20 ,000 square feet of floor area; B. Each loading space shall be not less than 10 feet in width, 25 feet in le ngth and 14 feet in height; C. Loading space, exclusive of drivew ays and/or corridors leading thereto, shall not be con sidered as providing off-street parking space. (Ord. 4949 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.52.135 Alternate parking layouts. Layouts and dimensions of off-street parking spaces, maneuvering aisles, driveways, driveway openings, and other related features different from those prescribed in Sections 18.52.050 ACC may be approved by the planning director upon written findings that demonstrate: A. The number of off-street parking spaces required by Section 18.52.020 ACC (unless reductions are permitted under Section 18.52.030) are provide d; B. There is substantial reason for varying the standard; and C. Ingress and egress is approved by the City Engineer where he or she ensures that adequate ingress to and egress from each required o ff-street parking space is provided for a vehicle of the appropriate size, and that ingress to and egre ss from the off-street par king facility is possible with minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrativ e procedures as may be ne cessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of a ny clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of th is ordinance, or t he invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not af fect the validity of the remainder of this ordinanc e, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. ACT.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6388 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 26 of 26 Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after it s passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: __________________ PASSED: _______________________ APPROVED: ____________________ CITY OF AUBURN ______________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Published: _________________ ACT.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6390 Outdoor Lighting Standards Date: December 8, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Agenda Bill Ordinance No. 6390 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:The Planning and Community Development Committee re commend approval of Ordinance No. 6390 to the full City Council.Background Summary:See attached. Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development, Public Works O ther: Planning Commission, Legal Councilmember:Norman Staff:Wagner Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:ACT.C AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED ACT.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to outdoor lighting . (Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1). Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Ordinance No. 6390 Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning and Community Development Committee to r ecommend to the City Council approval of Ordinance No. 6390. Background Summary: The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1, completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s resid ential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates t he City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street parking and landscaping. The Code Update Project is intended to meet four ke y objectives: * Improve development code readability and ease o f use; and * Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development review and quasi-judicial decision process; and * Ensure development code and design standards ar e coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and * Promote sustainability concepts where feasible. Ordinance 6390 will create a new Chapter 18.55 (Out door Lighting) of the Auburn City Code (ACC). The the purpose of this ordinance is to establish regul ations which discourage excessive lighting of outdo or spaces, encourage energy conservation and promote e xterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Information Services Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilme mber: Norman Staff: Wagner Meeting Date: December 12, 2011 Item Number: ACT.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to outdoor lighting . Date: December 7, 2011 Page 2 of 2 On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments. and made their recommendation to the City Council f or adoption of the proposed code amendments. Since the public hearing, the code amendments have been reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee and the Public Works Committe e. The Public Works Committee felt decorative lighting within a development should be encouraged. In response to input by the Public Works Committee, planning staff has added the following l anguage to the section’s intent statement: Decorative lighting that is architecturally integrated with th e character of the associated structures, site desi gn and landscape is encouraged. ACT.C
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 9 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 18.55 TO THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING OUTDOOR LIGHTING WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to t he City of Auburn zoning code are appropriate, in order to upd ate and better reflect the current development needs and standards of the City; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to establish regula tions which discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy conservation and promote exterior lightin g that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and within a devel opment while minimi zing impacts on adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City of Au burn Planning Commission held a public hearing on Oc tober 18, 2011, on the proposed code amendments regarding off-street parking and lo ading, landscaping and screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and WHEREAS, after fully consideri ng the testimony and information presented at the publi c hearing, on October 18, 2011, the Planning Commission made its recommendations for code am endments to the City of Auburn City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has revi ewed and considered the Planning Commission recommendations; and WHEREAS, environmental review on the proposal has been completed in accordance with the requirem ents of the State Environm ental Policy Act (SEPA) Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 1 of 6 ACT.C
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 2 of 6 with a final determination of non-signifi cance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A .106, the proposed zoning code amendments were sent to the Washi ngton State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review; and WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code amendments have been received from the Department of Comm erce or other state agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds t hat the proposed amendments improve the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates te chnical aspects of the code, improves the City’s developm ent review process, and promote sustainability concept s where feasible NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDA IN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.53 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as follows: Chapter 18.55 OUTDOOR LIGHTING Sections 18.55.010 Intent 18.55.020 Applicability 18.55.030 General requirements 18.55.040 Prohibited lights 18.55.040 Exceptions ACT.C
18.55.010 Intent. To discourage excessive lighting of out door spaces, encourage energy conservation and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. Decorative lighting that is architecturally integrated with the character of the associated structures, site design and landscape is encouraged. 18.55.020 Applicability. A. A lighting plan shall be re quired for projects as follows: 1. When an exterior lighting installation is part of a n ew development proposal requiring site plan review, an administrative or conditional use permit, or other development application that requires outside lighting or is a commercial project adjacent t o property zoned residential; and 2. For projects undergoing redevelopment, expansion or remode l when the redevelopment requires site plan approval, or for tenant improvements or other minor building improvements when exterior lighting is proposed to be install ed or modified. B. These regulations do not apply to subdivisions or individua l dwelling units, with the exception of common areas. Examples of comm on areas include, but are not limited to, pathways, clubhouses, parki ng lots and play areas. C. These regulations are not app licable to public rights-of-way. D. These regulations do not apply to lighti ng necessary for emergency equipment and work conducted in the interests of law enforcement or for the safety, health, or welfare of the public. 18.55.050 General requirements. A. Shielding Required. Except as otherwise exempt, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be constructed with shielding on all sides. The outdoor ligh t source (bulb or element) shall not be visible at or beyond the property line. Figure 18.55.030 Examples of light fi xtures with shielding on all sides B. Fixture heights. Lighting fixtures shall not exceed the following maximum heig hts: Table 18.55.030 Outdoor Lighting Location Fixture Height (Maximum as measured to the top of the fixture from grade) Within 50’ of a residential zoning district 16-ft Surface Parking Area C1, C3, M1, M2, EP All Other districts 30-ft 24-ft --------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 3 of 6 ACT.C
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 4 of 6 C. Photometric Plan Requirement s. A photometric plan shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval when required under 18.33.020 - Applicab ility. The required elements of the plan shall be specified in application forms to be provide d by the City T he photometric plan will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the provisions in this Chapt er. D. Level of Illumination. 1. Parking lots, driveways, and trash enclosures/areas shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of light and an averag e not to exceed four foot-candles of light. 2. Pedestrian walkways shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained one-half foot-candle of light and an average not to exceed two foot-cand les of light. 3. In order to minimize light spillage on abutting resident ial property, illumination measured at the nearest residential structure or rear yard setba ck line shall not exceed one-tenth foot-candle. E. Accent lighting. Lighting used to accent architectu ral features, landscaping or art is permitted to be directed upward, provided that the fi xture shall be located, aimed, or shielded to minimize light spill. No permit is required for this type of l ighting. F. Periods of Illumination 1. All outdoor lighting systems shall be equippe d with automatic switches conforming to the requirements of Section 1513.6.2 of the Washington Energy Code. 2. The use of sensor technologies, timers or other means to act ivate lighting during times when it will be needed is encouraged to conserve ene rgy, provide safety and promote compatibility between differ ent land uses. Lowe r lighting levels at off-peak times are encouraged as a safety measure. 3. However, outdoor lights may remain on during the required off hours when: i. Illuminating flags representing count ry, state, or other civic entity; ii. Functioning as security lighting (e.g., illuminating a pathway, building entry, etc.) iii. Associated with special events, etc. 18.55.040 Prohibited lights. The following lights are prohibited unless a temporary p ermit is obtained for specific events with specific times of operation: A. Strobe lights, Search lights, laser source light s, or any similar high-intensity light except for emergency use by police and fire personnel or at their direct ion. B. Roof-mounted lights except for security purposes with motion detection and full shielding so that the glare of the light source is not visi ble from any public right-of-way or a neighboring residence. C. Any light that imitates or causes visual inte rference with a traffic signal or other necessary safety or emergency light 18.55.050 Exceptions. The following light sources are exempt from the requirements of this section. A. Navigation and airport lighting required for the safe operation of boats and airplanes. B. Temporary lights used for holiday decorations C. Emergency lighting required by police, fire, and rescue autho rities. D. Lighting for state and federal highways aut horized by the Washington State Department of Transportation. E. Internal lighting of permitted signs. F. Outdoor lighting for public monuments. G. Temporary lighting in use during active construction proje cts H. Stadium and field lighting ACT.C
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 5 of 6 Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrativ e procedures as may be ne cessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of a ny clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of th is ordinance, or t he invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not af fect the validity of the remainder of this ordinanc e, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after it s passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: __________________ PASSED: _______________________ APPROVED: ____________________ CITY OF AUBURN ______________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ACT.C
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6390 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 6 of 6 _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Published: _________________ ACT.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6393 School Impact Fees Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Agenda Bill Ordinance Table of Comparison of fees Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:Planning and Community Development recommend approv al of Ordinance No. 6393 to the full City Council.Background Summary:See attached. Reviewed by Council Committees:Finance, Planning And Community Development Other: Legal Councilmember:Norman Staff:Dixon Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:ACT.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED ACT.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0008; Ordinance No. 6393 related to school district impact fees Date: December 6, 2011 Department: Planning & Development Dept. Attachments: Ordinance No. 6393 School impact Fee Proposal Table Budget Impact: $ Administrative Recommendation: Planning and Community Development Committee to rec ommend to City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6393. Background Summary: City’s Annual Review Title 19 (Impact Fees) of the Auburn City Code cont ains standards and regulations pertaining to the imposition of impact fees in the City of Auburn. Ch apter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) addresses the establishment, calculation, collection and amendmen t of school impact fees within the municipal boundaries of the City of Auburn. Four school dist ricts occur within the City limits. Pursuant to Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Revie w) of the Auburn City Code, on at least an annual basis, the Auburn City Council shall review the inf ormation submitted by the Districts pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element o f the city's comprehensive plan. The City Council may als o at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary. Relationship to District’s Capital Facilities Plans The City of Auburn annual Comprehensive Plan Amendm ent process for 2011 included requests for City approval of the Capital Facilities Plans of the fou r districts as follows: * 2011 - 2017 Auburn School District Capital Fac ilities Plan; * 2012-2017 Dieringer School District Capital Fa cilities Plan; * 2012 Federal Way School District Capital Facil ities Plan; and * 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Kent School Distri ct Capital Facilities Plan. These requests were submitted in accordance with th e provisions of Section 19.02.050 (Submission of District Capital Facilities Plan and Data) of the A uburn City Code. The School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans are contained in the working notebook (three ring binde r) associated with the 2011 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Additional copies of the School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans, are available from the Planning and Development Department. The Auburn City Council considered and approved incorpo rating the School Districts’ Capital Facilities Pla ns into the Comprehensive Plan at the regular council meeting on December 5, 2011. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder Meeting Date: : December 12, 2011 I tem Number: ACT.D
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6393 Date: December 6, 2011 Page 2 of 2 The approved Capital Facilities Plans contain propo sed school impact fees for each of the Districts. T he setting of the actual fees occurs through separate Council action amending Chapter 19.02 of the Auburn City Code. Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review ) which specifies the following: On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district p ursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunctio n with any update of the capital facilities plan el ement of the city's comprehensive plan. The city council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary; provided, t hat any school impact fee adjustment that would increase the school impact fee shall require the su bmittal of a written request for the adjustment by the applicable school district concurrent with the subm ittal of the annual capital facilities plan pursuan t to ACC 19.02.050. In making its decision to adjust impact fees, the city council will take into consideration the quality and completeness of the information provide d in the applicable school district capital facilit ies plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan. Section 19.02.060 establishes that the Auburn City Council is not obligated to accept the fees propose d by the School Districts within their submitted Capi tal Facilities Plans and may establish fees that th e Council determines are more appropriate and consist ent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitiga ting school impacts within the affected portion of the C ity. Committee Actions An introductory discussion of the school impact fee changes occurred at the PCD Committee’s regular meeting on November 28, 2011. For this meeting, th e Dieringer School District provided a letter requesting their impact fee for Single Family Resid ential be increased from $3,005 to $3,500. The committee discussion was amenable to the change. T he PCD Committee also requested a future code change to establish a deadline for submission of fe e increases. The Finance Committee is scheduled to discuss school impact fees at their regular meeting on December 19, 2011. Note Please note that the codified and on-line code sect ion ACC 19.02.115 lists the Dieringer School Distri ct SF dwelling unit school impact fee as $3,500. Howe ver this is due to a scribner’s error since the las t change to the school impact fees via Ordinance No. 6340, adopted December 20, 2010, continued to reflect Dieringer School District SF dwelling unit school impact fee as $3,005 (unchanged) effective 1 -1-11. ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 9 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 AND 19.02.140 OF TH E AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACTS FEES WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has adopted a school impact fee ordinance and collects school impact fees on behalf of certain school dist ricts located or located in part within the City of Auburn; and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District, Dieringer School D istrict, Federal Way School District, and the Kent School District, each being located in part within the City of Auburn, have provided the City of Auburn with updat ed capital facilities plans to be considered during the City’s 2011 annual comprehensive plan amendment process that addresses among other things, the appropriate school imp act fee for single family residential dwellings and multi- family residential dw ellings for each district; and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District issued a Determinati on of Non-Significance for the 2011 - 2017 Auburn School Distri ct Capital Facilities Plan April 22, 2011; the Dieringer School District issued a Determinati on of Non- Significance for the 2012-2017 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities P lan July 8, 2011; the Federal Way School District issued a Determination of Non-Signif icance for the 2012 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan April 23, 20 11; and the Kent School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 201 1-2012 through 2016-2017 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan June 7, 2011; an d ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS the City of Auburn issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on October 3, 2011 for the City of Auburn Year 2011 city-initiated comprehensive plan map and text amendments (File No. SEP11-0021) that i ncorporated by reference the previous threshold determinations by the Auburn Schoo l, Dieringer School District, Federal Way School District and the Kent School District , and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City’s o fficial newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Aubu rn Planning Commission on October 18, 2011 conducted public hearings on the proposed Aub urn School District 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan, the proposed Dieringer School District 2012 - 2017 Capital Facilities Plan; the proposed Federal Way School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan; and for the proposed Kent School District 2011-2012 thr ough 2016-2017 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing on October 18, 2011, and subsequent deliberations, the Auburn Planning Comm ission, following individual positive motions, made separate recommendations to the A uburn City Council on the approval of the Auburn School District 2011-2017 Capit al Facilities Plan, the Dieringer School District 2012 - 2017 Capital Facilities Plan; the Federal Way School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan; and for the Kent School Distr ict 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council considered the recomme ndations of the Auburn Planning Commission at a regularly scheduled mee ting on December 19, 2011, and a positive motion approved the Auburn School Distri ct 2011-2017 Capital Facilities ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 3 of 7 Plan, the Dieringer School District 2012 - 2017 Capita l Facilities Plan; the Federal Way School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan; and the Ke nt School District 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2011 the Public Works Committee of the Auburn City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendations; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2011 the Planning and Comm unity Development Committee of the Auburn City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting recommended to the Auburn City Council the approval of amendment s to Title 19 (Impact Fees) and more specifically, Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) per taining to school impact fees for single family residential dwelling units and multi -family dwelling units to be applied in the City of Auburn for the Auburn School District; Die ringer School District, Federal Way School District, and the Kent School District; respectively , based on the aforementioned capital facilities plans for each of these districts; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Code provides for adjustments to school impacts fees based on a review of the capital facilities plans fo r the districts; and WHEREAS, Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code specifies that the Auburn City Council will in making its decision to adjust impact fees take into consideration the quality and completeness of t he information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan; an d ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 4 of 7 WHEREAS, on December 19, 2011, the Auburn City Counci l considered the recommendation of the Planning and Community Develop ment Committee of the City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting on December 12 , 2011. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBU RN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.115 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.115 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the D ieringer School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule below is based up on a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent versi on of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the A uburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The cal culation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth an d development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors de fined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2011 2012 , the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $3,00 5 .00 $3,500.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $0.00 (Ord. 6279 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 1, 2008; Ord. 613 4 § 1, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 1, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 2, 2005.) Section 2. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.120 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.120 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the A uburn School District. ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 5 of 7 The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a r eview of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Aub urn School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculat ion is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth an d development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors de fined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2011 2012 , the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,266.33 $5,557.30 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $1,518.22 $2,305.22 (Ord. 6279 § 2, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 2, 2008; Ord. 613 4 § 2, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 2, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5793 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5232 § 1, 1999.) Section 3. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.130 is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.130 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Ke nt School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a r eview of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residen ces and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent versi on of the Kent School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The cal culation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth an d development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors de fined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2011 2012 , the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,486.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $3,378.00 ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 6 of 7 (Ord. 6279 § 3, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 3, 2008; Ord. 613 4 § 3, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 3, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5233 § 1, 1999.) Section 4. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.140 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.140 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Fe deral Way School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a r eview of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residen ces and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent versi on of the Federal Way School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionat e share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growt h and development to be funded by school impact fees based o n the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2011 2012 , the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $4,014.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $2,172.00 $1,253.00 (Ord. 6279 § 4, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 4, 2008; Ord. 613 4 § 4, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 4, 2006; Ord. 6042 § 1, 2006.) Section 5. Constitutionality and Invalidity. If any s ection, subsection sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any r eason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such h olding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ACT.D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6393 December 6, 2011 Page 7 of 7 Section 6. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take ef fect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publicatio n as provided by law. INTRODUCED: ________________________ PASSED: ________________________ APPROVED: ________________________ _____________________________________PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney ACT.D
School Impact Fee Proposal (Effective Year 2012) School District Multiple Family Single Family Past 20 1 1 fee Per ACC 19.02 CFP says : Requested Amount Change? Past 20 1 1 fee Per ACC 19.02 CFP says : Requested Amount Change? Auburn $1,518.22 $2 ,305 .22 page 27 $2 ,305 .22 Increase of $787.00 $5,266.33 $5,557 .3 0 page 27 $5,557 .3 0 In crease of $290.97 Dieringer $0.00 ($1,304 .00 ) Page 14 $0.00 No Change $3,005.00 * $5 ,681 .00 Page 14 $3,5 00 .00 Increase of $495.00 Federal Way $2 ,172.00 $1,253 .00 Page 30 & 33 $1,253 .00 Decrease of $919.00 $4,014 .00 $4,014.00 Page 30 & 33 $4,014.00 No Change Kent $3,378.00 $3,378.00 Page 30 & 31 $3,378.00 No Change $5,486 .00 $5,486.00 Page 29 & 31 $5,486.00 No Change * The codified and on-line city code currently lists the Dieringer School District SF dwelling unit scho ol impact fee as $3,500. However this is due to a scr ibner’s error since Ordinance No. 6340, updating th e fees and adopted December 20, 2010, continued to r eflect Dieringer School District SF dwelling unit school impact fee as $3,005 (unchanged) effective 1 -1-11. On 11-28-11 Dieringer School District requested by letter an increase from $3,005 to $350 0. ACT.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6387 Landscaping and Screening Date: December 8, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Memo Ordinance No. 6387 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:Staff recommends approval.Background Summary:See attached. Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development, Public Works O ther: Planning Commission, Legal Councilmember:Norman Staff:Wagner Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:DI.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED DI.A
Page 1 of 1 Memorandum Planning and Development Department To: Councilmember Lynn Norman, Chair, Planning and Comm unity Development Committee Councilmember Nancy Backus, Vice- Chair, Planning a nd Community Development Committee Councilmember John Partridge, Member, Planning and Community Development Committee From: Stuart Wagner, AICP, Planner CC: Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manage r Date: December 12, 2011 Re: Ordinance No. 6387 – Auburn City Code Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening At the November 28, 2011 Planning and Development C ommittee meeting a discussion on the proposed code amendments to Title 18 – Zoning was held . At that meeting the Committee members wanted staff to return with possible code revisions to th e landscape maintenance provisions within Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening. Planning st aff has since made a series of code changes which can be found as double underlines within Or dinance 6387 (Enclosure 1, page 12 and 13). If these changes are acceptable, staff will incorpora te them into the Ordinance ahead of the City Council taking action. On December 5, 2011 staff presented the proposed code a mendments to the Public Works Committee. At that meeting the committee members wer e supportive of the amendments but wanted to the PCDC to consider a change to the section o n significant tree retention within ACC 18.50 - Landscaping and Screening. Staff has summarized their concerns and suggestions below. Retention of significant trees (ACC 18.50.045 A) The draft code language states that significant trees w ithin the required perimeter landscaping area shall be retained. The Public Works Committee has a co ncern over the use of “shall” in the new code. Oftentimes the roots of significant trees can be exp ansive and possibly outside the required perimeter landscaping area. And if impacted through co nstruction of a parking lot or a sidewalk the tree’s health could be compromised. The Public Works C ommittee would like the PCDC to consider exceptions to significant tree retention within the requ ired perimeter landscaping area. DI.A
DRAFT ---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 1 of 15 ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 8 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.50 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO LANDSC APING AND SCREENING AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 18.04.318 TO CHAPTER 18.04 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO DEFINITIONS WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to t he City of Auburn zoning code are appropriate, in order to upd ate and better reflect the current development needs and standards of the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning code amendments will reorganize and update regulations and standards relat ed to landscaping and screening; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordi nance is to ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development, that plant materials complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest, and there is unnecessary disturbance of natural v egetation in new development; and WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City of Au burn Planning Commission held a public hearing on Oc tober 18, 2011, on the proposed code amendments regarding off-street parking and lo ading, landscaping and screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and WHEREAS, after fully consideri ng the testimony and information presented at the publi c hearing, on October 18, 2011, the Planning Commission made its recommendations for code am endments to the City of Auburn City Council; and DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 2 of 15 WHEREAS, the City Council has revi ewed and considered the Planning Commission recommendations; and WHEREAS, environmental review on the proposal has been completed in accordance with the requirem ents of the State Environm ental Policy Act (SEPA) with a final determination of non-signifi cance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments were sent to the Washi ngton State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review; and WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code amendments have been received from the Department of Comm erce or other state agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds t hat the proposed amendments improve the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates te chnical aspects of the code, improves the City’s developm ent review process, and promote sustainability concept s where feasible NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDA IN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.50 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows: DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 3 of 15 Chapter 18.50 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Sections: 18.50.010 Intent. 18.50.020 Scope.Applicability. 18.50.030 Definitions. 18.50.040 Types of landscaping. Landscape development standards. 18.50.045 Preservation of significant trees. 18.50 .050 Regulations by zone. 18.50.060 General l L andscape plan requirements. 18.50.070 Landscape maintenance requirements.Administration and Enforcement. 18.50.080 Modification of landscaping requirements.Alternative landscape plan. 18.50.010 Intent. The intent of this chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and screening requirements in order to maintain and protect property values, to enhance the city's appearance, to visually unify the city and its neighborhoods, to improve the character of certai n areas of the city, to reduce erosion and storm water runoff, to r educe CO2 emissions, improve air quality , and to maintain or replace existing vegetation and to prevent and abat e public nuisances. (Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4773 § 1, 1995; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.020 Scope.Applicability . A. This chapter applies to all uses and activiti es developed in the city excluding single-family and duplex units on individual lots. B. When additions, alterations, or repairs of any existing bui lding or structure exceed 50 percent of the value of the building or struct ure, or a residential use is converted to a nonresidential use, then such building or structur e shall be considered to be a new use and site landscaping provided in accordance with this Chapter accordingly ; provided, that if any existing foundation or fence layout precludes full complia nce herewith, then the landscaping requirements may be modified by the planning director in approved landscape plans . (Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(33), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.030 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following terms shall h ave the following meanings: A. "Deciduous trees" are a minimum of one and one -half to two inches in diameter at the time of planting; B. "Evergreen trees" are a minimum of four to six feet in height at the time of plan ting and may include either broadleaf or conifer; C. "Groundcover" means low evergreen or deciduous plantings planted at three -foot spacing, in all directions; D. "Shrubs" are a minimum of 18 to 24 i nches in height, or two gallons, at the time of planting; E. "Significant trees" means a healthy evergreen tree, six inches or mo re in diameter measured four feet above grade; or a healthy deci duous tree four inches or more in diameter measured four feet a bove grade. The planning director may authorize the exclusio n of any significant tree which for the reason of public health, sa fety or reasonable site development is not desirable to maintain. (Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.040 Types o f landscaping. Landscape development standards. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 4 of 15 A. General Location for Landscape Improvem ents. Landscaping shall be provided in the following locations for all types of development, unless the City determines that the required landscape is not necessary to fulf ill the purposes of this chapter. 1. Perimeter Areas. All areas that abut a street or residential property shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter, except where occupied by a primary building, walk or driveway. Minimum landscape areas are listed in Table 18-50-040 A and B 2. Unused Areas. All areas of a multifamily or nonresidential project site not intended for a specific use (including areas planned for future phases of a phased development), shall be landscaped with existing natural veget ation, native grasses or similar. 3. Parking/Loading Areas. Parking lots, and where loading areas are visible from a public street, shall be landscaped in compliance with thi s Chapter. 4. Outdoor Storage Areas, Recreational Vehicle Parking, and Ref use Areas. All outdoor storage areas, recreational vehicle parking, and refuse areas, when visible from adjoining properties or public streets, shall be la ndscaped in compliance with this Chapter. B. Landscape Area Requirements by Zones. Minimum landscape area re quirements are listed below by zones consis tent with ACC 18.02.070. Table 18.50.040 A Minimum Landscape Requirements by Zoning District Zones Minimum Landscape Coverage 1 Minimum Landscape Planter Width – Perimeter Areas 2 Abutting Street 3 Abutting Residential Property Residential Zones RC, R1, R5, and R7 Residential Zones 4 N/A N/A N/A R10, R16 and R20 Zones 5 20% 6 ft. 10 ft. Non Residential Zones C2 10% 0 ft. 6 ft. C1, CN 10% 6 ft. 10 ft. C3, I, P1 15% 6 ft. 10 ft. EP 10% 10 ft. 10 ft. BP 15% 10 ft. 10 ft. M1 10% 10 ft. 10 ft. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 5 of 15 M2 10% 10 ft. 25 ft. Other RO 6 / RO-H 6 N/A N/A N/A DUC 7 N/A N/A N/A Notes: 1. Minimum landscape coverage required is the minimum percentage o f net lot area that must be maintained with a vegetated pervious surface, Vegetated bioretention cells o r water quality treatment swales (not permanently inundat ed or ponded areas) may be included in the required landscape coverage percentage. 2. Listed planter widths shall be located entirely on pri vate property. 3. The minimum landscape planter abutting a street may be reduced in size using the provision contained in ACC18.50.080, Alternative landscape plan. The reduced landscape planter shall have an average width of the requirement contained in Table 18.50.040. 4. Landscaping shall only be required in conjunction with an Administrative or Conditional Use Permit. The type and amount of landscaping shall be determined at that time t he Administrative or Conditi onal Use Permit is approved. 5. Refer to ACC18.31.200 Multi-family Development and Mixed-use Development Design Standards and procedures for additional requirements. 6. Landscaping within the RO/RO-H zone is not requir ed unless site development includes the demolition of existing structure(s) together with new construction. Unde r this scenario the minimum landscape requirements of the C1 zone shall be met. 7. Landscaping within the DUC zone shall be provided as defined in the Downtown Urban Center Design Standards, see reference to ACC 18.29.070. C. Landscape Design and Planting Requirement s. Landscape design and construction for new development or redevelopment shall be compatible with t he surrounding urban and natural environment. Landscape plantings shall comply with the plant type, size, and spacing provisions listed below. 1. Landscape Design. Landscaping shall be designed as an in tegral part of the overall site plan with the purpose of enhancing building design, public views and spaces, and providing buffers, transitions, and screening. a. All required planting areas shall be covered with a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover plants. Sodded lawn (not seed) may be substituted f or some but not of all shrubs or ground cover plants. If sodded lawn is used it cann ot cover more than 20 percent of the site and those portions of the lawn area must be served by an automatic irrigation system. b. Planting design shall have focal points at project entries, plaza areas, and other areas of interest using distinct planting and/or landscape features. c. As appropriate, building and site design shall include the use of landscaping against buildings to visually break up expanses of wall, soften appearance, and create visual interest through the use of planting areas, wall plante rs, and/or raised planters Loose rock, gravel, decorative rock or stone shall not exceed 20 pe rcent of the planting area. 2. Plant Types. Landscape planting shall be compatible with the character and climate of the Pacific Northwest and complement the arch itectural design of structures on the site. a. Native Landscaping. Landscaping materials installed shall include species native to the Puget Sound lowland region of the Pacific Northwest or non-invasive species that have adapted to the climactic conditions of the region in the following minimum amounts: DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 6 of 15 i. 50 percent of trees. ii. 50 percent of ground cover and shrubs. b. Trees. Trees planted within ten (10) feet of a public street, sidewalk, paved trail, or walkway shall be a deep-rooted species and shal l be separated from hardscapes by a root barrier to prevent physical damage to public improvements. 3. Planting Size and Spacing. In order to balance both an immediate effect of a landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plant material sizes and plant spacing are as follows: a. Trees. Trees shall be a minimum of one and one-half in di ameter breast height (dbh) at the time of planting. Evergreen trees sha ll be a minimum of four to six feet in height at the time of planting and may include either br oadleaf or conifer. Tree spacing within the perimeter planters along streets and abutting residen tial property shall be planted no further apart on center than the mature diam eter of the proposed species. b. Shrubs. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 18 inches in height, or two gallon size containers, at the time of planting. c. Groundcover. Groundcover means low evergreen or deciduous plant ings and shall be planted from either 4-inch pot with 12-inch spa cing or 1-gallon pot with 18-inch spacing, Alternative spacing of particular species may be approved by the city if documentation concerning the effectiveness of the ground cover is submitted with the landscape plan. d. Additional Spacing Provisions. i. Tree size and spacing at installati on shall be increased by the city where needed to ensure visual access for vehicles and pedestrians and provide clear vision at street, access tracts and driveway intersections (sight distance triangles). ii. Trees or shrubs with a full-grown hei ght equal to or greater than 30 inches shall not be planted in any sight distance triangl e. Sight distance triangles are determined in conformance with the City of Auburn Engineering Design Standards, Chapter 10. iii. A minimum distance of 15 feet is requi red from the mature diameter of trees and the center of street light standards. 4. Landscaping Requirements for Parking Areas. a. General Parking Lot Landscaping Standards i. All parking lot landscape areas shall be protected with vertical or extruded concrete curbs, or equivalent barriers. Bumper blocks shall not be used as a substitute for curbing and boundary around the landscaped area; ii. All parking lot landscaping must be located between parki ng stalls, at the end of rows of parking, or between the end of rows of stalls an d the property line. iii. The maximum distance between any parking stall and requi red parking area landscaping shall be no more than 50 feet. iv. Shrubs, ground cover or lawn shall be planted to cover ea ch parking lot planting area using the planting size and spaci ng requirements specific in ACC 18.50.040 3. above. All ground cover shall have a matu re height of not more than 24 inches. v. Modifications to protect drainage feat ures, easements, or utility facilities may be allowed. Modifications that reduce landscape area or pl ant material shall be made up elsewhere on-site, if possible. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 7 of 15 vi. The requirements of this section shall not apply to parki ng garages or to display areas for automotive and equipment sales and rentals t hat are specifically designed, approved and constructed for the display purpose and that do not reduce required landscape areas. b. Specific Parking Lot Landscaping Standards Table 18.50.040 B Specific Parking Lot Landscaping Standards Landscaped Area Required Planting Area Design Requirements Plantings Required 12 parking stalls or less No requirement 13-75 parking stalls 7% of surface parking stalls (exclusive of circulation) Minimum planter width: 6 feet Trees shall be provided at the rate of a minimum of one per planter and/or one per 100 square feet of planter. 76 parking stalls or more 10% of surface parking stalls (exclusive of circulation) Minimum planter width: 6 feet Trees shall be provided at the rate of a minimum of one per planter and/or one per 100 square feet of planter. 5. Landscaping for Outdoor Storage Areas, Recreational Vehicle Parking and Refuse Areas. a. Outdoor storage areas and recreational vehicle parking areas must be screened from view from adjacent streets and from all re sidentially zoned land by a minimum six (6) foot wide landscape buffer. This landscape buffer s hall contain evergreen trees or tall shrubs, a minimum of six feet in height at the time of planting, which will provide a 100 percent sight-obscuring screen within three years from the time of planting is required; or a combination of evergreen trees or deciduous trees, planted 20 feet on center with no more than 30 percent b eing deciduous and backed by a 100 percent sight-obscuri ng fence. In addition to the trees, shrubs shall be planted at four-foot spacing, in all directions, and groundcover provided. b. Outdoor storage areas abutting the Interu rban Trail (regardless of the zoning of the Interurban Trail) and other future trails connecting to the Interurban Trail shall have a minimum 10-foot wide landscape buffer containi ng the planting materials specified in ACC 18.50.040 5(a), above. c. Trash containers, dumpsters, tras h compactors, and recycling bins associated with multiplex, multi-unit residential, and nonres idential uses must be screened from public view on all sides with a solid fence, wall, or gate co nstructed of cedar, redwood, masonry, or other similar building material reflecting the overall design of t he site, and be appropriately landscaped (eg. climbing vines, arborvitae, etc). 6. Irrigation. No portion of any landscaped ar ea shall be located further away than 50 feet from a source of water adequate to irrigat e the landscaping. The source of water may be a manual (hose connection) or an automatic irrigation system. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 8 of 15 A. Type I – Solid Screen. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a significant sight barrier to separate incompatib le uses. Type I landscaping shall consist of evergreen tree s or tall shrubs, a minimum of six feet in height at the time of planting, which will provide a 100 percent sight -obscuring screen within three y ears from the time of planting; or a combination of evergreen trees or deciduous trees, planted 20 feet on center with no more t han 30 percent being deciduous and backed by a 100 percent sight -obscuring fence. In addition to the trees, shrubs shall be p lanted at four -foot spacing, in all directions, and gro undcover provided. B. Type II – Visual Screen. Type II landscaping is intended to create a visua l separation between different uses or zones. Type II landsc aping shall consist of evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, planted 20 feet on center. In addition to the trees, shrubs shall be planted at three -foot spacing, in all directions, and groundcover provided. C. Type III – Visual Buffer. Type III landscaping is inte nded to provide a visual separation of uses from the s treet and the visual separation of co mpatible uses. Type III landscaping shall consist of evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 75 percent being deciduous, planted 30 feet on center. In addition to the trees, shrubs shall be planted at four -foot spacing in all directions, and groundcover provided. D. Type IV – See -Through Buffer. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide a visual relief between compatible uses. Type IV landscaping sha ll consist of deciduous trees, planted 30 feet on center, shru bs planted at four -foot spacing, in all directions, and groundcover provided. (Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(34), (35), 1988; Ord. 422 9 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.050 Regulations by zone. A. R -C, R -1, R -5, R -7, and R -10 Residential Zones. Landscaping shall o nly be required in conjunction with an administrative or conditional use permit. The type and amount of landscaping shall be determined at that time the administr ative or conditional use permit is approved. B. R -16 and R -20 Residential Zones. 1. Street fro ntage: five -foot width of Type III; 2. Abutting R -C, R -1, R -5, or R -7 zone: five -foot width of Type III, adjacent parking or driveways will require a five -foot width of Type II; 3. Abutting R -10 zone: five -foot width of Type IV, adjacent parking or drivewa ys will require a five -foot width of Type III. C. RO and RO -H Districts. 1. Street frontage: 10 -foot width of Type III; 2. Abutting R -C, R -1, R -5, R -7, or R -10 zone: 10 -foot width of Type III, adjacent parking or driveways will require a 10 -foot width of T ype II; 3. Abutting R -16, R -20, R -MHC: five -foot width of Type IV, adjacent parking or driveways will require a five -foot width of Type III; 4. For conversions of single -family residences to commercial uses within the RO district, existing healthy landscap ing may be retained and utilized or supplemented to meet the intent of the code requirements as determined by the planning and development director or designee. See ACC 18.50.060 for plan requirements. D. I, C -1, C -2, C -N, and P -1 Districts. 1. Street fron tage: five -foot width of Type III, no st reet frontage landscaping is required for the C -2 zone except for parking lots and as may be required by ACC 18.28.050(F); 2. Abutting R -C, R -1, R -5, R -7, or R -10 zone: five -foot width of Type II, adjacent parking or driveways will require a five -foot width of Type I; 3. Abutting R -16, R -20, RO, RO -H, or R -MHC zone: five -foot width of Type III, adjacent parking or driveways will require a five -foot width of Type II. E. C -3, LF Districts. 1. Street frontage: five -foot width of Type III; DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 9 of 15 2. Abutting R -C, R -1, R -5, R -7, or R -10 zone: 10 -foot width of Type II, adjacent parking or driveways will require a 10 -foot width of Type I; 3. Abutting R -16, R -20, RO, RO -H or R -MHC zone: 10 -foot width of Type III, adjacent parking or driveways will require a 10 -foot width of Type II; 4. Outdoor storage yards abutting any C, P, I or M -1 zone. F. M -1 District. 1. Street frontage: 10 -foot width of Type III, an additional 10 -foot width will be required when loading and unloading docks face a street. In lieu of the additional 10 -foot width of Type III landscaping, a Type II landscaping may be provided; 2. Abutting any R zone: 10 -foot width of Type I; 3. Abutting I, C -1, C -2, P -1, or C -N zone: 10 -foot width of Type II, adjacent outdoor storag e yards will require a 10 -foot width of Type I; 4. Abutting C -3 or LF zone: 10 -foot width of Type III, adjacent outdoor storage yards will require a 10 -foot width of Type I; 5. For those buildings that have frontage on a street, a min imum of a 10 -foot widt h of Type III landscaping shall be placed next to the building; 6. Outdoor storage yards abutting other M -1 zoned property shall have a minimum width of a five -foot Type I landscaping; 7. Abutting the Interurban Trail. Outdoor storage yards abutting the In terurban Trail (regardless of the zoning of the Interurban Trail) shall have a minimum 10 -foot width of Type I landscaping. G. M -2 District. 1. Street frontage: 10 -foot width of Type III; 2. Abutting any R zone: 30 -foot width of Type I; 3. Abutting I, C -1, C -2, P -1, or C -N zone: 10 -foot width of Type II, adjacent outdoor storage yards will require a 10 -foot width of Type I; 4. Abutting C -3 or LF zone: 10 -foot width of Type II, adjacent outdoor storage yards will require a 10 -foot width of Type I; 5. For tho se buildings that have frontage on a street a minimum of a 10 -foot width of Type II landscaping shall be placed next to the buildi ng. H. BP District. The amount and type of landscapi ng shall be determined at the time of the approval of the business park. T he landscaping requirements shall, however, be guided by the M -1 requirements and a minimum of 15 percent of the business park shall be landscaped. I. EP District. 1. Except as provided for in subsection (I)(2) of this section, all required yards shall be landscaped with Type III landscaping. 2. The planning director may reduce the wi dth of required landscaping by up to 50 percent for projects employing drip irrigation or similar water conservation measures, use of native plant materials, or xeriscaping. 3. In no case shall less than 15 percent of the lot be landscap ed. 4. Outdoor storage areas shall be screened with a minimum width of five -foot Type I landscaping. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6269 § 20, 2009; Ord. 6231 § 4, 2009; Ord. 6036 § 3, 2006; Ord. 586 3 § 5, 2004; Ord. 5342 § 2, 2000; Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(36) – (39), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.045 Preservation of significant trees. A. Retention. In the required perimeter l andscaping area, applicants shall retain all significant trees. A significant tree means a he althy evergreen tree, six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above grade, or a healthy decid uous tree four inches or more in diameter measured four feet above grade. Alders and cottonw oods are excluded from this definition. If the grade level adjoining a tree to b e retained is to be altered to a degree that would DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 10 of 15 endanger the viability of a tree or trees, then the ap plicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be capable of protecting the tree. Areas devoted to driveways, curb cuts, and sight distance requirem ents, utilities and storm drainage facilities may be exempted from this requirement. Signi ficant trees may also be exempted from this requirement if it is determined by the planning director based on satisfactory evidence pursuant to report prepared by a consulting arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. The report submitted to the city shall demonstrate the significant tree is: 1. Damaged; or 2. Diseased; or 3. Has weak structural integr ity that poses a safety hazard. If additional significant trees are to be remov ed, the applicant shall seek approval of an “Alternative landscape plan” from the pl anning director under ACC 18.50.080. B. Encroachment into Dripline. No construction ac tivities shall take place within the drip line of a tree to be retained without extra precauti ons as recommended by a certified arborist. The applicant may install impervious or compactable su rface within the area defined by the drip line when a qualified arborist determines that such ac tivities will not endanger the tree or trees. (See the definition of “drip line” in ACC 18.04.318) C. Tree Protection. All signifi cant trees that are to be retained must be protected during construction by installation of a protective barricade or f ence. This will require preliminary identification of the proposed area of distur bance for staff inspection and approval, then installation of a protective barricade or fence before major excavation with heavy equipment begins. 18.50.060 General landscape requirements Landscaping plan requirements . A. Persons Qualified to Prepare Landscape Plan. A landscape plan shall be required and shall be accurately drawn using an appropriate engineering scale and shall illustrate the following signed by a licensed landscape architect is not re quired. However, if the plan is determined by the City to be illegible or inadequate for review the landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect licensed in t he state of Washington, a nurser y professional certified pursuant to the Washington Certified Nursery Professional program, or a Washington State certified landscape technician. A. B. Application. A landscape plan shall be requi red and shall be accurately drawn using an appropriate engineering scale and contain all info rmation specified by the planning director in the application form and accompanying checklist provided by the City. 1. Adjacent streets, public and private; 2. Boundaries and dimen sions of site; 3. Location of on -site buildings; 4. Location of on -site parking areas; 5. Location and size of landscape areas; 6. Location, species and size of planting materials; 7. Location of outdoor storage areas; 8. Location of significant trees; DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 11 of 15 9. Location of water sou rce(s). If the subject property is located within the RO district, a landscape plan signed by a licensed landscape architect is not required; however, a plan shall be prepared by the applicant providing a written record of landscaping to be retained and m aintained, and generic naming of vegetation is acceptable. The plans shall be approved by the plannin g and development director or designee prior to issuance of any building permits. B. Driveways and Pedestrian Walkways. Landscaping is generally requi red along all street frontages with the exception of driveways and pedestrian walkways within the property. C. Fences. When fences and landscaping are required along the property line, the fence shall be set back of the landscaping if the fence abuts a st reet, so as to not obscure such landscaping. At other property lines the landscaping shall be located to serve the greatest public benefit. D. Irrigation. No portion of any landscaped area shall be located further away than 50 feet from a source of water adequa te to irrigate the landscaping. E. Lawn Substitution. Sodded lawn may be substi tuted for the required shrubs or ground cover but all portions of the lawn area must be served by an automatic irrigation system. F. Maintenance G. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor sto rage yards that are visible from a street or are adjacent to residentially zoned property shall be screened by a minimum of a five -foot width of Type I landscaping. Additional width may be re quired to comply with ACC 18.50.050. H. Parking Lots. 1. A plante r area shall be required along the ent ire street frontage(s), except driveways and walkways; provided, that no sight -obscuring plants will be allowed whenever safe sight clearance is necessary for ingress and egress from a public street. The width of the p lanter area shall be as required in ACC 18.50.050(A) through (H) for street frontages; 2. All lots with more than 12 spaces, a 100 -square -foot planter area shall be required at the end of each single row of parking, but in no case shall there be more than 10 parking spaces between any required planter area. The location of the planter area may be varied upon evidence submitted which sh ows that the intent of the landscaping requirements has not been lessened. Any variation must receive pla nning director appr oval; 3. Each planter area shall contain at least one tree, a mini mum of one and one -half to two inches in caliper. For planter areas in excess of 30 feet in length, more trees are required and shall be spaced not further than 30 feet apart ; 4. Each plante r area shall contain shrubs, spaced three feet on center, and be a minimum of one gallon in size; 5. Residential and nonresidential parking lots with five or l ess spaces shall be exempt from the parking lot landscape requirements. I. Performance Assurance J. Private Property. All required landscaping sh all be located entirely on private property. When landscaping is required to separate adjacent uses, th e landscaping shall run the full length of the adjacent property. K. Sight Hazards. The building official and/or city engineer may review and modify landscape plans which may affect visibility for ingress, or egress, corner lots or other intersections. Any reduction of landscaping shall be made up el sewhere on -site. L. Significant Trees. All significant trees , as defined by ACC 18.50.030(E), shall be retained and made part of the landscape plan. M. Species. The applicant shall utilize plant materials whic h complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 12 of 15 N. Landscaped Berms. In addition to the minimu m landscape requirements of ACC 18.50.050, landscaped berms may be required to miti gate any impacts associ ated with a specific project. The berms may be applied through an administrative or conditional use permit, contract rezone, or as a condition associa ted with a mitigated determination of nonsignificance o r environmental impact statement. The minimum hei ght of the earth creating the berm shall be three feet and have a slope no greater than two -foot horizontal to one -foot vertical. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6231 § 5, 2009; Ord. 4914 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.50.070 Landscape Maintenance Requirements Administration and Enforcement. I. A. Performance assurance. 1. The required landscaping must be installed pr ior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy unless the building official planning director determines that a pe rformance assurance device will adequately protect t he interests of the city; 2. The performance assurance device shall only be valid for a 120-day period and shall have a value of 100 percent of the estimated cost of the landscapi ng to be performed, inclusive of planting materials and installation . If the landscaping has not been installed after the 12 0 days then the assurance device may be used by the city to perform any necessary work to implement the landscape plan. This time period can be extended if the City determines that: a. Installation of the landscaping woul d not be successful due to weather; or b. Product is not available due to the time of year. 2.3. The performance assurance device shall be accompanied by an agreement granting the city and its agents the right to enter the property and perform work. The agreement shall also hold the city harmless from all claims and expenses, including attorney's fees; 3.4. Upon completion of the required landscaping by the property owner the city shall release the performance assurance device. F. Maintenance B. Initial Maintenance Period.After installation of the required landscaping, the property owner shall complete an initial maintenance period lasting one year. The property owner shall comply with the provisions below: 1. The property owner shall be responsible for replacing any unhealthy or dead plants for a period of two one years after the initial planting. 2. The building official planning director shall require a maintenance assurance device, unless converting a single-family residence to a nonresidenti al use within the RO district, for a period of one year from the completion of planting in ord er to ensure compliance with the requirements of this section. The value of the maintenance assurance device shall equal at least 50 100 percent of the total landscape materials plus installatio n . 3. If the landscaping is not being properly ma intained, the property owner shall be so notified by the city. If after 30 days from the ci ty's notification the lands caping is still not being maintained then the maintenance device may be used by the cit y to perform any type of maintenance necessary to ensure compliance with this chapter. 4. The maintenance assurance device shall be accompanied by an agreement granting the city and its agents the right to enter th e property and perform any necessary work. The agreement shall also hold the city harmless from all claims and expenses, including attorney's fees. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 13 of 15 5. Upon completion of the one-year maintenance period, and if maintenance has not been performed by the city, the city shall release the maintenance assurance device. 6.5. C. Maintenance of Landscape Area (On-Going). A. Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, groundcover, or grass, pla nted as a requirement pursuant to this title, ACC Title 16 or ACC Title 17 shal l be maintained in a healthy, living condition. All landscaping which, due to accident, damage, disease, lack of maintenance, or other cause, fails to show a healthy appearance and growth, shall be replaced. Replacement plants shall conform to all standards that govern the origi nal planting installation, approved landscaping plan, or as approved by the planning director. If the landscaping is not replaced the property owner or designee shall be subject to the enforcement provisions contained in ACC 18.50.070 D . Pruning of trees or shrubs shall be for the purpose of mai ntaining the tree or shrub in a healthy growing condition, and shall not adversely a ffect the healthy living condition of the plant or excessively damage the natural growing process. 1. Tree and Shrub Pruning. A permit is not required to prune trees and shrubs on private property. Pruning which results in the removal of at le ast half of the live crown will be considered tree removal and subject to the prov isions in ACC18.50.070 D. Tree pruning should be performed by a landscape contractor, one that is certified by the International Society of Arborculture as a Certified Tree Trimmer or Cert ified Arborist or other qualified tree expert. Limitations on Allowable Pruning. Tree and shrub pruning sha ll be allowed only for the following purposes: a. Removal of dead wood and diseased, cr owed, and weakly attached trunks and branches that create a hazard to private property and citizens; b. Providing adequate clearance and visibility for safe use of parking stalls, travel ways and walkways for the passage of persons and vehicles; c. Eliminating traffic sign visibility obstructions; d. Providing adequate visibility for security patrols; e. Repairing split trees and limbs in order to save a tree an d its appearance; f. Removing or severing tree roots that are causing damage to public or private property, including curbs, gutters, sidewalk, drainage lines an d parking lot surfaces; or g. Providing visibility for merchant signs and increasing parking lo t lighting only when the aesthetics of the tr ee or shrub will not be reduced. 2. Tree topping. Tree topping is prohibit ed, except under the following circumstances: a. Branches interfering with utility lines; b. Significant canopy dieback has occurred; c. Storm damage or prior incorrect pruning requires correction; D. Enforcement. B. Violation of these provisions shall be processed in accordance with the procedures defined under Chapter 1.25 ACC. T he property owner or designee responsible for correcting the violation shall provide a correcti ve action plan that defines how and when the infraction will be corrected within the time provisions defined by Chapter 1.25 ACC 1. C. The corrective action plan shall be subject to the followi ng replacement ratios: a. For plants that have died, replacement vegetation shall be at least 150 percent of the planting size required of the subject plant mate rial at the time of planting. The plants shall be of the same or similar species to those plant s being replaced, unless alternate species are approved by the planning director. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 14 of 15 b. For trees or shrubs that have been excessively pruned, replacement vegetation shall be at least 200 percent of the size of the tr ee or shrub that was requi red by city regulations at the time of planting. The tree s or shrubs shall be of the same or similar species of the plant s being replaced, unless alternate species are approved by the planning director. D. Pruning of trees or shrubs done to alleviate documented pub lic health and safety is permissible and shall not be considered a civil vi olation; provided, that documentation is provided to the city that a public health or safety concern exists. 2. E. The property owner or designee shall correct the infraction o r provide a schedule that defines how and when the infraction will be co rrected within the time provisions defined by Chapter 1.25 ACC. (Ord. 5777 § 1, 2003.) 18.50.080 Modification of landscaping requirements. Alternative landscaping plan. A. The director may aut horize a reduced width of planting or waive some or all of the landscaping requirements if the applicant proposes an alternative method of landscaping tha t would achieve the intent and purpose of the landscaping required in this chapter and which, in the o pinion of the director, provides a superior level of bufferin g/screening. Alternative landscaping techniques may include the use of native vegetat ion existing on site, the use of berms or increasing perimeter landscape width in strategic locations. B. With in the RO district, the planning and development director or designee may authorize employment of alternate landscape me thods; provided, that the vegetation is maintained pursuant to ACC 18.50.070. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6231 § 6, 2009; Ord. 5863 § 6, 2004.) The planning director may authorize modification of the la ndscape requirements when alternative plans comply with the intent of this chapter and : A. The proposed landscaping provid es for creative landscape design; or B. Incorporates the increased retention of significant trees and naturally occurring undergrowth; or C. Incorporates historic or architectural features such as fountains, sculptures, structures and the like. Section 2. That a new section 18.04.318 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is cr eated to read as follows: ACC 18.04.318 Dripline. “Dripline” An area encircling the base of a tree, the minimum extent of which is delineated by a vertical line extending from the outer limit of a tree’s branch tips down to the ground. Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrativ e procedures as may be ne cessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. DI.A
---------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6387 - DRAFT December 12, 2011 Page 15 of 15 Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of a ny clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of th is ordinance, or t he invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not af fect the validity of the remainder of this ordinanc e, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after it s passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: __________________ PASSED: _______________________ APPROVED: ____________________ CITY OF AUBURN ______________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Published: _________________ DI.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6389 Variances, Special Exceptions an d Administrative Appeals Date: December 8, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Memo Ordinance Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:Staff recommends approval.Background Summary:See attached. Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development, Public Works O ther: Planning Commission, Legal Councilmember:Norman Staff:Wagner Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:DI.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED DI.B
Page 1 of 1 Memorandum Planning and Development Department To: Councilmember Lynn Norman, Chair, Planning and Comm unity Development Committee Councilmember Nancy Backus, Vice- Chair, Planning a nd Community Development Committee Councilmember John Partridge, Member, Planning and Community Development Committee From: Stuart Wagner, AICP, Planner CC: Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manage r Date: December 12, 2011 Re: Proposed Amendments to T itle 1 8 – Z oning, of the Auburn Z oning City Code related to the administrative variance process (Code U pdate Pro j ect – Phase 2 – G rouping 1 ) O n December 5 , 2011 staff presented the draft administrative varian ce process to the Public Works Committee . At that meeting the committee members w ere supportive of the process but w anted to the Planning and Community Development Committee to re-e xamine the criteria for varying building height. Staff has summarized their concerns and suggest ions below as well as an approach from planning staff. Administrative Variances – Building Height (ACC 18.70.015) As the proposed code is currently written, the Public W orks Committee believes the administrative variance for adjusting building height is too permissiv e, where a numerical value (such as a percentage maximum) or additional criteria should be considered. Planning staff has since investigated into whether add ing a percentage maximum is a good approach where granting a variance. Staff recommends th at a 50% maximum be added to Section 18.70.015. However, staff’s investigation did raise a concern. What if a commercial structure was to built near a residential zone, and its height was to greatly exceed t he surrounding residences. Based on this scenario possibly occurring staff feels a public noticing r equirement should be added to the code, one that allows for public comment that would then be given to the Planning Director prior to the decision. If a residential zoning district is within 300-ft of th e subject site, then a public noticing requirement is required. Lastly because the Downtown Urban Center zoning dist rict has specific provisions on building height staff has added the following to th e regulations: refer to Chapter 18.29 ACC for varying height within the Downtown Urban Center , DUC zoning district. DI.B
DRAFT Ordinance No. 6389 - DRAFT November 14, 2011 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 8 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 18.70 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING VARIANCES, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn zoning code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current development needs and standards of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the best in terest of the City to amend Section 18.70., “Variances, Special Exception s, and Administrative Appeals” adding an Administrative Variance process where under specific cases the planning director could grant relief to develop ment standards, not to exceed 25 percent of a quantifiable standard; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City’s la nd use decision making process should be revised so that minor issues are determined in relatively quick administrative processes and major issues are thoro ughly assessed and are subject to the full public scrutiny of the Hearing Examiner process; and WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City of Aub urn Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 201 1, on the proposed code amendments regarding off-street parking and loading , landscaping and screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and WHEREAS, after fully considering the testimony and information presented at the public hearing, on October 18, 201 1, the Planning Commission DI.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6389 - DRAFT November 14, 2011 Page 2 of 5 made its recommendations for code amendments to the City of Auburn City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and conside red the Planning Commission recommendations; and WHEREAS, environmental review on the proposal has been completed in accordance with the requirements of the State Envir onmental Policy Act (SEPA) with a final determination of non-significance (DNS ) issued September 15, 2011; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments were sent to the Washington State Depart ment of Commerce, Growth Management Services, and other state agencie s as required for the 60-day state review; and WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code amendments have been received from the Department o f Commerce or other state agencies; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A UBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.70 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows: Chapter 18.70 VARIANCES, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE A PPEALS Sections: 18.70.010 Variances. 18.70.015 Administrative Variance 18.70.020 Special exceptions. DI.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6389 - DRAFT November 14, 2011 Page 3 of 5 18.70.025 Variances in regulatory floodplains. 18.70.030 Application. 18.70.040 Hearing date and notice. 18.70.050 Administrative appeals. 18.70.060 Appeal of hearing examiner’s decision. 18.70.015 Administrative Variance A. The planning director may in specific cases, aut horize a variance to the development regulations, subject to the criteria set below. 1. Building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and l ot width a. Applicability. These shall include variances to building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width not to exceed 25 percent of a q uantifiable standard. b. Criteria. The planning director may, in specifi c cases, authorize a variance to the development regulations, subject to compliance with one or more of the following criteria: i. That the variance, if granted, will not alter th e character of the neighborhood, or be detrimental to surrounding properties in which t he lot is located. ii. That the special circumstances and conditions a ssociated with the variance are not a result of the actions of the applicant. iii. Literal interpretation of the provisions of th is title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district. iv. The approval of the variance will be consistent with the purpose of this title and the zoning district in which the property is locate d. 2. Variance to building height a. Applicability. The construction of a principal o r accessory building which exceeds the height limit may be authorized upon a lot. b. Criteria. The planning director may, in specific cases, authorize a variance to the height of buildings, subject to compliance with one or more of the following criteria: i. Additional height shall be the minimum necessary to afford relief. ii. That the variance, if granted, will not alter t he character of the neighborhood, or be detrimental to surrounding properties in which t he lot is located. iii. The approval of the variance will be consisten t with the purpose of this title and the zoning district in which the property is locate d. B. In authorization of an administrative variance, the planning director may attach such conditions regarding the location, character and ot her features of the proposed structure or use as he/she may deem necessary to carry out the inten t and purpose of this title and in the public interest. C. A variance so authorized shall become void after the expiration of one year, or longer period if specified at the time of issuance, if no building permit, occupancy permit or business registration has been issued in accordance with the plans for which such variance was authorized. The planning director may extend the pe riod of variance authorization for one additional year upon a finding that there has been no basic change in pertinent conditions surrounding the property at the time of the origina l application. 18.70.030 Application. In addition to the requirements for a complete appl ication as set forth in ACC Title 14, a site plan shall be required with each application for a variance, administrative variance or special exception. The site plan shall be accurately drawn using an appropriate engineering scale and shall illustrate the following: A. Adjacent street; DI.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6389 - DRAFT November 14, 2011 Page 4 of 5 B. Boundaries and dimensions of site; C. Location of buildings; D. Location of parking areas; E. Location of feature needing variance. (Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalid ity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance s hall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, appro val and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: __________________ PASSED: _______________________ APPROVED: ____________________ CITY OF AUBURN ______________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ DI.B
--------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6389 - DRAFT November 14, 2011 Page 5 of 5 Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Published: _________________ DI.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Director's Report Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: No Attachments Available Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:For information only.Background Summary:Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:DI.C AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED DI.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: PCDC Status Matrix Date: December 7, 2011 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: PCDC Status Matrix Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation:For information only.Background Summary:Reviewed by Council Committees:Planning And Community Development Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 12, 2011 Item Number:DI.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED DI.D
PCDC Work Plan Matrix – December 12, 2011 December 12, 2011 Page 1 LAND USE CODES/POLICIES Topic/Issue Next on PCD Staff/Council Lead Comments 1 • Muckleshoot Tribe TBD Snyder Staff to stay in touch with Taylor and keep coordin ation & communication open with Tribe. 2 Code Update Work • Phase II Code Updates – Group 2 1 st Quarter 2012 Wagner Phase II, Group 2 Code Updates to Planning Commissi on for discussion and public hearing in Janurary/February, 2012. • Cluster Subdivision Winter 2011-2012 Snyder Staff to prepare draft regulations for the P lanning Commission to review. • Cottage Housing Winter 2011-2012 Snyder Staff to prepare draft regulations for the P lanning Commission to review. • Cell Towers – stealth design, antennas, and revenue January 2012 Taylor Staff to bring to PCDC for disc ussion and policy direction. • Environmental Park District 2012 Snyder Code work to follow green zone summit. • Compressed Natural Gas TBD Dixon Waiting for application submittal for cod e work from applicant. Please Note: New additions underlined, deletions re moved, retreat items are highlighted. DI.D
December 12, 2011 Page 2 Topic/Issue Next on PCD Staff/Council Lead Comments 3 Urban Center/Downtown – joint review by Downtown Redevelopment Committee and PCDC • Healthcare District Overlay Winter 2011-2012 Chamberlain Staff to work with Mayor’s Office to engage Auburn Regional Medical Center in planning process. • Urban Center Expansion Spring 2012 Chamberlain Staff to prepare draft white paper on issues/opport unities/challenges for expansion of urban center. • ADA Spring 2012 Chamberlain Next update will be on in t he Spring of 2012. • Amtrak On-going Mayor Lewis/ Snyder City tracking potential station stops expansion stu dy by Amtrak. • Downtown Parking Management Plan On-going Snyder/ Chamberlain Parking inventory complete and under review, public survey elements being prepared. 4 7-year update to Comprehensive Plan On-going Snyder/ Chamberlain Legislature approved bill to extend deadline out to 2015. • Hazard Mitigation TBD Dixon Incorporate the hazard mitigation plans being devel oped either as a new element or appendix to the comprehensive plan. Sta ff to consider accomplishing as part of the 7-year comprehensive p lan update. 5 Historic Preservation Strategies Winter 2011-2012 Snyder/ Chamberlain Staff will formulate a strategy action plan and bri ng back to Committee. 6 Strategy Areas for Population/Business/Employment Winter 2011-2012 Snyder/ Chamberlain Staff conducted Auburn Way South Visual Preference Survey with Committee and will conduct Visual Preference Studie s for other strategy areas. DI.D
December 12, 2011 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL 7 Auburn Environmental Park As Needed Snyder/ Andersen Staff is coordinating with WSDOT on Phase II acquis ition opportunities; Boardwalk design complete, construction process und erway. 8 ASCENT As Needed Snyder Continue to explore oppor tunities as part of Green Zone planning efforts. 10 Green Zone Summit TBD Snyder/ Andersen Summit planning to start in January, 2012. 11 Green Zone Business Plan/Marketing Strategy TBD Snyder/ Andersen Staff to prepare draft business plan/marketing stra tegy for Committee input. PARKS, ARTS & RECREATION 12 Jacobson Park/BPA Master Plan TBD Faber Staff/Co nsultant will provide update based on Community Mee tings. 13 Lea Hill/Green River CC Park TBD Faber Memorandum of Understanding between the City and GR CC to swap property – Lea Hill park to GRCC and the Martin pro perty to the City for a new park. Lea Hill/Green River CC Park Master Plan Completed. 14 Les Gove Community Center Monthly as needed Faber/ R. Wagner Monthly updates as needed. 15 Theater Plan TBD Faber No future action is neede d on this topic until funding is located. 16 Transportation for activities TBD Faber Community Center Committee to review; lat e night activities for youth. DI.D
December 12, 2011 Page 4 T opic/Issue Next on PCD Staff/Council Lead Comments COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION 17 Building Community TBD Hursh PCDC requested update at a future meeting; briefing to be scheduled. 18 Human Services Center Ongoing Hursh Review HS contract language and Consolidated Plan l anguage for mandatory participation in the One-Stop-Shop. Staf f provided an update to PCDC on 9/27/10. 19 Unify communities through centralized communication and outreach Fall 2012 Hursh Community Services to give annual u pdates. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & HEARING EXAMINER 20 Arts Commission November 2012 Faber Joint meeting held on 11/14/11 with PCDC. 21 Downtown Redevelopment Committee TBD Chamberlain/ Norman Monthly updates as needed. 22 Hearing Examiner Oct 2012 Dixon Hearing Examiner attended 10/24/11 meeting for annu al briefing with the Committee. 23 Parks & Recreation Board Summer 2012 Faber Annua l update occurred 6/13/11 with PCDC. 24 Planning Commission As Needed Snyder/ Chamberlain Possible joint meetings in 2012 for the Phase II Gr oup 2 Code Update work and sub-area plan work. 25 Transportation, Transit, and Trails TBD Thordar son Staff to schedule meeting with Transportation, Tran sit and Trails Committee Chair. 26 Urban Tree Board Summer 2012 Faber Annual update occurred 6/13/11 with PCDC. DI.D
December 12, 2011 Page 5 T opic/Issue Next on PCD Staff/Council Lead Comments CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANNING (Long Range Planning) 27 Transportation Planning Scope: Long-term planning for the interrelationship between land use and transportation infrastructure On-going Hankins Comprehensive Transportation Update adopted by City Council in 2009. Updated annually as needed as part of comprehensive plan update process. 28 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Scope: 6-year transportation improvement program that is updated annually identifying transportation related capital projects September - 2012 Hankins Draft 6-year-transportation improvement program rev iewed by Committee on November 28, 2011. 29 Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) Scope: 6-year capital improvement financial planning for sewer, water, stormwater and streets. On-going Finance Updated annually as needed as part of comprehensive plan update process. OTHER 31 Economic Development Updates As Needed Mayor Fu ture briefings to be provided as needed. DI.D