The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6280 Exhibit "B" Policy / Text Amendment 1-4Exhibit B POLICY /TEXT• AMENDMENT #1 Auburn School District Updated 2009 -2015 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Auburn School District Updated 2009 -2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 2009) Section Table of Contents Executive Summary Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections Page 6 Section III Standard of Service Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees Page 24 Section VIII Appendices Page 28 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 I. Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan ") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District ") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2009. This Plan is consistent with prior long -term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long -range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K -2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3 -4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6 -12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2009 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase of 2 early childhood classrooms at elementary level B. Increase of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level C. Reduction of 1 structured learning classroom at middle level D. Increase of 2 structured learning classrooms at the high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009. Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009. Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009. Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009. Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009. Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009. 4 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (265) 0 (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom. is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (27) 0 (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 120 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The . program is housed at'three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (80) 0 (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre - school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eleven standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are'not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (292) 0 (292) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non - standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non - standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss 10 (106) 0 (106) Exhibit B POLICY/TEXT AMENDMENT #1 Auburn School District Updated 2009-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Auburn School District Updated 2009-2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 2009) AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931 -4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Lisa Conners Craig Schumaker Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections Page 6 Section III Standard of Service Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity Page 18 Section VI Capital•Construction Plan Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees Page 24 Section VIII Appendices Page 28 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section I Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 I. Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan ") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District ") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2009. This Plan is consistent with prior long -term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long -range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K -2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3 -4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6 -12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) 2 •£•d xipuaddd ut pautuluoo sr ulup sigZ •sluautdo[anap pagiluapt .ioj uEds api.ti goua .toj siaqutnu uoipuraua2 luapnls lunlou loulstQ agl sane poq;aui stq.I. •utalsXs um) luapnls sdoulsip ay wag ulup luapnls q tm 2uiddgtu aql alut2alui 01 puu `•SIJ'Clump ao.tatd puu Aunoj 2ui)I wag ulup `aium1Jos 2utdduut slJpo asn oqi gltm st Elup 01412utloal[oo Jo poglaW atu •S.tuaIC anti 2sul agl ut palorulsuoo sluaWdolanap X[iutui- ilinua puE Apwtj apuis wag lot.tlstQ [oogos u.mgnd aga ut loogos puallu XIIEniou oqm sluapnls ay 5uisn pa1E.taua2 uaaq aim! SJOIOE3 uoi1EJaua2 luapnls 041 •sliun 2utllamp A[tuiuj -il[nm puu Xltutuj aputs .ioj saaj loudutt loops pasodo.td aql glJoJ slas IIA uotloas •luautdolanap puu glmoj2 2utouauadxa loulstQ u Xq pa.unout p drui [uosg 0141 jo autos 2utlaaw ut 1slsSE of saaJ lOEdutt Jo luautssassu agl JOJ apinoJd lua)I jo'i3 0141 put uzngnd Jo fit) aql `Aluno) Out)I / q paldopu saouuutp o as j loudU!I [oogoS au '600Z goJCj,4 ut l0[[uq aql uo paou[d sum lugl ansst puoq u puu Xnal sluauzanoJdutt IEliduo u 01 pal suo[lupuawwooaJ 0S31.11 •SJC0i U01 lxau agl .tano WOWS UOAOS JO lu311139E03.1 puu sat ;t[touJ 2uilsixa of sluawanotdutt IulidCO JoJ prwoq ay 01 suot1upuauwooa.t aput.0 aalliutcuo3 01.1t.1002S E 800Z iogolop ut puu satlil(OJ lOUlsip [[CJo matna.t antsuaga.tdutoO E palaldutoo loulsip au •SEOJC asap ui luautdolanap pamols sug amlumop otuiouooa 041 'tOOZ ui sladolanap of plos sum lap SO.IOU gSi AtalututxoJddu JO EOM Uu SUIT lua)I JO '2tD atu •Ilam SE 2O[.11SIQ aql IOEduti 1Egl luamdolanap jo slaN00d .Jaglo a.IE atag,j, •loulsip aql Jo SE= 'cairn utngnd gl.Iou 0142 put `[[iH ua'I ay 'gums puu[a)lu-j ay are pulsip [oogos all uo 2OUdun luuotitu2is anuq 11341 SE0.IE 00141 1OulsIQ loops umgnd aqa u[gl[m SEWS luaWdolanap aalut ay wag pa2E.taua2 act 02 °seamO ! uotlC[ndod luapnls paloaroid aql mu! 01 patinbat 0.113 satli[IOEJ mau au •glmoJ2 alupoWuzo00E 02 sans loogOS alnjnj Jo uoi1istnbou aql su [[am se `[oogoS kuluauza[a mau E puu looIOS a[ppiut mau u jo uoi2OTUIsuoO aql sapnlout mid 041 'LOOZ 30 [tud 0142 ut 2utuado £reluawa[g uasgoouf .mgl•V puu 900Z Jo [[ud aql ut 2uivado kruluauia[g sll!H pUEI031u1 Slim `•SOOZ itiuruga3 ut saalon ay iCq panotddu sloo4OS ,Ctuluauta[a mau oml Jo uotlippu 0141 puu `.SOOZ .taquialdas ut pauado puu £OOZ i(.tuniga3 ui s.talon aql icq panotdde loo4OS mau E JoJ papino.td snit' •satli[1OEJ 5utlsixa sdOulsIQ ay 01 uot1uziutapoW pasodoid puu suogippu aql sassaippu IA Uogoas ui umogs uuld uotlorulsuoo IEliduO 0111 (uoiluuuoJUI ogioads atom .10J A uoiaoas 33S) '8002 `i .tagolop Jo su £OL`17 I Sum sluapnls [unpiniput Jo.tagwnu [unlou aqs •(ualIatapui)I,cuu [in3 sapnioui) £8'8i0`bi sum pouad autCS sill .tOJ luaut[loiva Cg1 J,,) lua[untnbg awa 11nJ sua1agm £i7L`£ i SCAN i(ltOUduO 60-800Z mOUlsiU 041 •sWooJssujO [uuo[lisuen 2utpn[oai sat1111OEJ Jo £C.toluanui 5upsixa all puu a0tn.tas Jo ptupuuls St41 uo pasuq paluin0[EO Si louls[Q all ut s[oogOS amp iC1tOUdCO aqs Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2009 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase of 2 early childhood classrooms at elementary level B. Increase of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level C. Reduction of 1 structured learning classroom at middle level D. Increase of 2 structured learning classrooms at the high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009. Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009. Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009. Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009. Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009. Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009. 4 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2008 to 2009 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2008 CPF 2009 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Elementary 0.3370 0.3200 Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1450 0.1520 by the school district based on district Sr. High Multi - Family 0.1780 0.1580 records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0650 0.0790 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0290 0.0340 Sr. High 0.0390 0.0420 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,750,000 $21,750,000 Middle School $42,500,000 $42,500,000 Site Aquistion Costs Cost per acre $272,387 $286,006 Updated estimates on land costs Area Cost Allowance Boec $168.43 $168.79 Updated to projected SPI schedule. Match % - State 59.32% 59.17% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 40.68% 40.83% Computed District Average AV Single Family $290,617 $316,271 Updated from March 2009 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi - Family $78,574 $85,729 Updated from March 2009 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $1.79 $1.67 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 5.11% 4.99% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3 -09) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2008 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey March 2009 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections ". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE 11.1 ASD ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS (March 2009 Projected GRADE 2008 -09 Actual 2009 -10 Projected 2010 -11 Projected 2011 -12 Projected 2012 -13 Projected 2013 -14 Projected 2014 -15 Projected KDG 998 1024 1051 1082 1114 1142 1170 1 1015 1057 1084 1116 1149 1177 1205 2 1024 1044 1087 1118 1151 1179 1207 3 1048 1058 1078 1126 1159 1187 1216 4 1044 1092 1102 1128 1176 1205 1233 5 1069 1088 1136 1152 1178 1223 1252 K - 5 6198 6364 6538 6722 6926 7114 7283 6 1096 1095 1114 1168 1185 1208 1252 7 1034 1120 1119 1144 1199 1211 1234 8 1076 1065 1152 1157 1182 1233 1246 6 -8 3206 3280 3385 3469 3566 3652 3732 9 1256 1368 1361 1458 1469 1495 1549 10 1341 1218 1330 1329 1426 1431 1455 11 • 1350 1275 1151 1267 1265 1355 1358 12 1352 1326 1250 1130 1245 1237 1325 9 -12 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 5687 TOTALS 14703 14831 15016 15374 15898 16284 16701 GRADES K -12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K -5 w/K @ 1/2 5699 5851 6013 6181 6369 6543 6698 6 -8 3206 3280 3385 3469 3566 3652 3732 9 -12 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 5687 K -12 w/K @ 1/2 14204 14319 14490 14833 15341 15713 16117 Note: The distric is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in nine schools and includes two state funded Full Day Kindergarten at two additional elementary schools. 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,198 students in grades K through 5. 665 of the 998 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5, plus 333 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K -5 enrollment is 5,784. Four middle schools house 3,206 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,299 students in grades 9 through 12. The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil /teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils.per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 20 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by two classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss 9 (53) 0 (53) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (265) 0 (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (27) 0 (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 120 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (80) 0 (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre - school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eleven standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are'not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (292) 0 (292) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non - standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non - standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss 10 (106) 0 (106) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (371) 0 (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (371) 0 (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1 -728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (371) 0 (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full -Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition, 1 -728 funds and currently has two schools receiving state funding for 2008 -09 school year. The district is utilizing fourteen classrooms at nine of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss 11 (186) 0 (186) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Nine classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self- contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the four classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = Total Capacity Loss (53) 0 (53) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/14/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid -level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss 12 (240) 0 (240) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss (210) 0 (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates six structured learning center classrooms for 53 students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires two standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss (60) 0 (60) TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR 18 -21 YEAR OLD The Auburn School District operates a transition program for 18 -21 year old students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two classrooms are utilized for this program that connects students to the community and work. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss (60) 0 (60) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires eleven classrooms to provide for approximately 370 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss 13 (300) 0 (300) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/14/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,332) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,332) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (533) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (533) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,270) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,135) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,135) 14 (300) 0 (300) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (November 2008) District School Facilities Buildin ' . . Acres Address Elementar Schools Washin•ton Elementa 492 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementa 401 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementa 550 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementa 415 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementa 485 8.75 3502 Auburn Wa South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementa 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Re Elementa 531 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Ever • reen Hei:hts Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Al ,ac Elementa 494 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementa 595 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementa 578 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementa 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementa 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementa 614 10.00 29205 132'' Street SE, Auburn, WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7249 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 01 m.ic Middle School 898 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 845 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior Hi_h Schools West Auburn Hi:h School 231 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior Hi:h 2,261 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,431 40.00 28900 124'h Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,311 TOTAL CAPACITY 16,025 16 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE IV.2 TEMPORARY /RELOCATABLE FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2009) 2009 -10 Elementary Location 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Washington 0 2 0 O N M M C!) N C D N N N ON Ct 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 • 8 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 8 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 13 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 330 5 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 CO 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 2 4 4 4 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 32 34 33 33 33 33 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 848 901 875 875 875 875 Middle School Location 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 • 8 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 11 13 13 18 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 330 390 390 540 600 600 600 Sr. High School Location 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 750 750 750 780 780 780 780 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 66 70 72 77 79 79 79 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,875 1,988 2,041 2,195 2,255 2,255 2,255 17 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section V Pupil Capacity 1/ 3/ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 Capacity WITH relocatables 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 A. SPI Capacity 15,950 15,950 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS B. C. D. E. Capacity Adjustments Net Capacity ASD Enrollment ASD Surplus /Deficit CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 14) 1/ 3/ 2/ (2,260) (2,147) 15,950 (2,094) 15,950 (1,940) 15,950 800 (1,880) 16,750 (1,880) 13,690 13,803 14,703 14,319 (1,013) (516) 1,875 1,988 (4,135) (4,135) 13,856 14,490 (634) 2,041 (4,135) 14,010 14,833 (823) 2,195 (4,135) 14,870 15,341 (471) 2,255 (4,135) 14,870 15,713 (843) 2,255 (4,135) 16,750 585 (1,880) 15,455 16,117 (662) 2,255 (4,131 Total Adjustments (2,260) (2,147) (2,094) (1,940) (1,880) (1,880) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables (1,8801 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 A. A.1 A.2 B. C. D. E. CAPACITY SPI Capacity SPI Capacity -New Ele SPI Capacity- New MS 15,950 15,950 m Capacity Adjustments Net Capacity ASD Enrollment ASD Surplus /Deficit ADJUSTMENTS Exclude SOS (pg 14) (4,135) (4,135) 15,950 (4,135) 15,950 (4,135) 15,950 800 (4,135) 16,750 (4,135) 16,750 585 (4,135) 11,815 11,815 14,703 14,319 (2,888) (2,504) (4,135) (4,135) 11,815 14,490 (2,675) (4,135) 11,815 14,833 (3,018) (4,135) 12,615 15,341 (2,726) (4,135) 12,615 15,713 (3,098) (4,135) Total Adjustments (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) 13,200 16,117 (2,917) (4,135) (4,135) if New facilities shown in 2012 -13 and 2014 -15 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25.38% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23.35% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). 19 Building 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 West Auburn 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 Auburn 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 Auburn Riverside 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 Auburn Mountainview 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 SH CAPACITY 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2009) A. Elementa Schools Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 PUPIL CAPACITY Building 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Washington 492 492 492 492 492 492 492 Terminal Park 401 401 401 401 401 401 401 Dick Scobee 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Pioneer 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 Chinook 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 Lea Hill 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 Gildo Rey 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 Ever Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Lake View 595 595 595 595 595 595 595 Hazelwood 578 578 578 578 578 578 578 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Arthur Jacobsen 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Elementary #15 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,796 B. Middle Schools Building 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Cascade 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 Olympic 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 Rainier 849 849 849 849 849 849 849 Mt. Baker 845 845 845 845 845 845 845 Middle School #5 0 0 0 0 800 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,428 3,428 3,428 3,428 4,228 4,228 4,228 C. Senior His Schools 'COMBINED CAPACITY I 15,950 I 15,950 I 15,950 I 15,950 I 16,750 I 16,750 I 17,335 I 20 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997 -98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24 -97 -98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. 22 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72 %. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the Fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004 -05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005 -06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004 -05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. This review also identified the need for a Special Education Transition Facility for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. This facility is planned to be operational by the Fall of 2009 to address this growth need. The District is projecting 1998 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will 23 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty- six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues and/or capital improvement levies. 2009 -15 Capital Construction Plan March 2009 Project Funded Projected Cost Fund Source Project Timelines 08 -09 09 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14 14 -15 All Facilities - Technology Modernization Yes $12,000,000 2006 6 Year Cap Levy XX XX XX XX Portables Yes $1,200,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Property Purchase New Middle School New Elementary Yes Yes $9,000,000 $3,500,000 Impact Fees State Mat XX XX XX ----- XX const XX XX const XX open Special Education Transition Facilit Yes $750,000 Impact Fees XX XX Middle School #5 No $42,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan Elementary #15 No $21,750,000 Bond Impact Fee ---- XX plan XX const XX open Multiple Facility Im . rovements No $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX XX XX XX XX XX Replacement of three a : in schools No $239,000,000 Bond Issue XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction. The district is eligible for state matching funds for modernization. 24 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section VII Impact Fees IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring Middle school site acquistion within 6 year period Middle School #5 within 6 year period Elementary #15 within 6 year period I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Auburn Sch ,strict No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 2009) Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) /Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Acrea e Cost/ Acre Facility Ca•aci Student Generation Factor Single Famil Multi Family Cost/ Single Family Cost/ Multi Family Elem (K - 5) 12 $0 550 0.3200 0.0790 $0.00 $0.00 Middle Sch (6 - 8 25 $286,006 800 0.1520 0.0340 $1,358.53 $303.88 Sr High (9 - 12) 40 $0 1500 0.1580 0.0420 $0.00 $0.00 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) n Famil $1,358.53 303.88 Facility Cost Facility Size % Perm Sq Ft/ Total S• Ft Student Generation Factor Single Famil Multi Family Cost/ Single Family Cost/ Multi Family Elem (K -5) $21,750,000 550 0.9691 0.3200 0.0790 $12,263.82 $3,027.63 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $42,500,000 800 0.9691 0.1520 0.0340 $7,825.67 $1,750.48 Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 0.9691 0.1580 0.0420 $0.00 $0.00 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) mil $20,089.49 $4,778.11 Facility Cost Facility Size • % Temp Sq Ft/ Total S• Ft Student Generation Factor Single Famil Multi Famil Cost/ Single Famil Cost/ Multi Famil Elem (K - 5) $122,845 26.5 0.0309 0.3200 0.0790 $45.80 $11.31 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $122,845 30 0.0309 0.1520 0.0340 $19.22 $4.30 Sr High (9 - 12) $0 30 0.0309 0.1580 0.0420 $0.00 $0.00 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Foo age x District Match x Student Factor) $65.02 15.61 Boeckh Index SPI Foota e District Match Student Generation Factor Single Famil Multi Family Cost/ Single Family Cost/ Multi Family Elem (K - 5) $168.79 90 59.17% 0.3200 0.0790 $2,876.34 $710.10 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $168.79 108 59.17% 0.1520 0.0340 $1,639.52 $366.73 Sr High (9 - 12) $168.79 130 59.17% 0.1580 0.0420 $2,051.39 $545.31 25 $6,567.25 $1,622.14 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Assd Value Curr Dbt Sery Tax Rate Bnd Byrindx Ann Int Rate Numb of Years Tax Credit Single Family Tax Credit Multi Family Single Family $316,271 $1.67 4.99% 10 Multi Family $85,729 $1.67 4.99% 10 $4,080.39 $1,106.04 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility /Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facil Credit Single Family $0.00 Multi Family 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 FEE RECAP SUMMARY PER UNIT IMPACT FEES Single Family Site Costs Permanent Facility Const Costs Temporary Facility Costs State Match Credit Tax Credit $1,358.53 $20,089.49 $65.02 ($6,567.25) ($4,080.39) FEE (No Discount) $10,865.40 FEE (50% Discount) Facility Credit Net Fee Obligation $5,432.70 $0.00 $5,432.70 Multi Family $303.88 $4,778.11 $15.61 ($1,622.14) ($1,106.04) $2,369.42 $1,184.71 $0.00 $1,184.71 Auburn Sch. ,strict No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 throu • h 2015 IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY Elem K -5 Mid Sch 6 -8 Sr High 9 -12 Elem K -5 Mid Sch 6 -8 Sr High 9 -12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count (3/08) 0.320 0.152 0.158 0.079 0.034 0.042 New Fac Capacity ASD District Standards 550 800 1500 550 800 1500 New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates Feb 2008 $21,750,000 $42,500,000 $21,750,000 $42,500,000 $10,302,842 Middle School Cost Estimate Feb 2008 $259,416 5.00% Middle School 2010 $286,006 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 26.5 30 30 26.5 30 30 Grades K - 5 @ 26.5 and 6 - 12 @ 30. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $122,845 $122,845 $122,845 $122,845 $122,845 $122,845 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $286,006 $286,006 $286,006 $286,006 $286,006 $286,006 Perm Sq Footage SPI Rpt #3 dated Nov 14, 2008 1,723,525 1,723,525 1,723,525 1,723,525 1,723,525 1,723,525 Temp Sq Footage 66 portables at 832 sq. ft. each 54,912 54,912 54,912 54,912 54,912 54,912 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,778,437 1,778,437 1,778,437 1,778,437 1,778,437 1,778,437 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 96.91% 96.91% 96.91% 96.91% 96.91% 96.91% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 3.09% 3.09% 3.09% 3.09% 3.09% 3.09% SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for March 2009 $168.79 $168.79 $168.79 $168.79 $168.79 $168.79 Match % - State From SPI Webpage March 2008 59.17% 59.17% 59.17% 59.17% 59.17% 59.17% Match % - District Computed 40.83% 40.83% 40.83% 40.83% 40.83% 40.83% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2009 $316,271 $316,271 $316,271 $85,729 $85,729 $85,729 (multi family weighted average) Debt Sery Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 G. 0 Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2009) 4.99% 4.99% 4.99% 4.99% 4.99% 4.99% Site Cost Pro "ections Recent Property Acquisitions Acreage Purchase Year Purchase Price Purchase Cost/Acre Adjusted Present Day Projected Annual Inflation Factor Sites Required Latest Date of Acquisition Projected Cost/Acre Lakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $301,638 Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $217,194 Total 47.00 $10,302,842 $219,209 $259,416 5.00% Middle School 2010 $286,006 27 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2008 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 — Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments — page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1— Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. 1 Table 3 — Projection Models — pages 5 -13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) — breaks out the K -5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) — breaks out the 6 -8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) — breaks out the 9 -12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11 -13) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary. Historically, average gain in students over the past 6 years is 1.53% annually that equates to 213 students. Over the past 13 years the average gain is 1.41% and equates to 189 students annually. Using the cohort survival models that data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: • Elementary level shows increase ranging from 286 to 581. (page 7) • Middle School level shows increase ranging from 170 to 256. (page 8) • High School level shows decreases ranging from -38 to -112. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: • Elementary level shows increase ranging from 490 to 1220. (page 7) • Middle School level shows increase ranging from 300 to 599. (page 8) • High School level shows increase ranging from 106 to 374. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 2 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments(Rev 10/08) 1 Actual GRADE 96/97 97/98 98/99 99 -00 00 -01 01 -02 02 -03 03 -04 04 -05 05 -06 06 -07 07 -08 08 -09 KDG 963 978 854 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1 998 1031 995 943 905 968 900 982 960 963 1012 995 1015 2 970 1014 1023 1015 914 949 961 909 992 963 1002 1019 1024 3 990 980 1009 1054 1031 966 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 4 961 985 974 1012 1071 1077 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 5 917 958 982 983 1011 1108 1062 1018 957 1065 998 1078 1069 6 916 941 962 981 998 1028 1104 1111 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 7 934 959 939 1015 979 1017 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 8 949 911 959 974 1003 1004 1026 1052 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 9 1061 1163 1156 1202 1222 1405 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 10 1084 1012 1165 1132 1157 1073 1234 1249 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 11 893 1026 1007 1036 1067 1090 927 1010 1055 1182 1322 1352 1350 12 805 811 917 855 865 930 933 902 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 TOTALS 12441 12769 12942 13051 13135 13461 13427 13702 13672 14088 14418 14559 14703 Percent of Gain 2.64% 1.35% 0.84% 0.64% 2.48% (0.25)% 2.05% (0.22)% 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99% Pupil Gain 328 173 109 84 326 -34 275 -30 416 330 141 144 Average % Gain for 1st 6 years. 1.28% Average % Gain for last 6 years 1.53% Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 164 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 213 Average % Gain for 13 years. 1.41% Average Pupil Gain for 13 years. 189 TABLE 1A Grade Group Combinations KDG 963 978 854 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 K,1,2 2931 3023 2872 2807 2731 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 K -5 5799 5946 5837 5856 5844 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 6033 6142 K -6 6715 6887 6799 6837 6842 6942 6845 6885 6755 6891 7091 7149 1 -3 2958 3025 3027 3012 2850 2883 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 3011 1 -5 4836 4968 4983 5007 4932 5068 4836 4852 4843 4932 5092 5146 1 -6 5752 5909 5945 5988 5930 6096 5940 5963 5863 5936 6150 6153 6 -8 2799 2811 2860 2970 2980 3049 3151 3294 3274 3169 3144 3097 7 -8 1883 1870 1898 1989 1982 2021 2047 2183 2254 2165 2086 2090 7 -9 2944 3033 3054 3191 3204 3426 3488 3656 3715 3544 3458 3427 9 -12 3843 4012 4245 4225 4311 4498 4535 4634 4663 5032 5241 5320 10 -12 2782 2849 3089 3023 3089 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 3869 3983 998 3037 6198 7294 3087 5200 6296 3206 2110 3366 5299 4043 prj08- 09.xls Page 3 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F "''OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 ., c Factors Used in Projections 2 Factor Average Pupil Change Between Grade 1 Levels 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE K to 1 54.67 K to 1 47.80 1to2 11.08 1to2 17.60 2 to 3 20.08 2 to 3 22.20 3to4 19.17 3to4 32.20 4to5 19.00 4to5 31.80 5to6 14.42 5to6 13.80 6to7 ________ 15.67 6to7 11.40 7to8 13.25 7to8 18.80 8 to 9 301.42 8 to 9 276.20 9 to 10 (74.75) 9 to 10 (53.80) 10 to 11 (91.17) 10 to 11 (80.00) 11 to 12 (84.83) 11 to 12 (37.00) total 218.00 total 301.00 Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of pupils as they move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses the past (12) OR (5) years of changes. Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level 2 13 YEAR BASE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES 6 YEAR BASE K 2.92 K 15.20 1 1.42 1 6.60 2 4.50 2 23.00 3 4.83 3 10.40 4 6.92 4 19.40 5 12.67 5 10.20 6 15.00 6 (3.00) 7 8.33 7 (19.40) 8 10.58 8 4.80 9 16.25 9 (43.40) 10 21.42 10 18.40 11 38.08 11 68.00 12 45.58 12 90.00 Factor 2 is the average change in grade level size from 94/95 OR 01/02. prj08- 09.xls Factor 3 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES CAL- ENDAR YEAR TOTAL LIVE BIRTHS 2 /3rds BIRTHS 1 /3rds BIRTHS YEAR OF ENROLL ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS KDG ENROLL. AUBURN KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT AS A % OF ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS 1971 16,436 10,957 5,479 77/78 14,625 578 3.952% 1972 13,719 9,146 4,573 78/79 13,539 598 4.417% 1973 13,449 8,966 4,483 79/80 13,478 618 4.585% 1974 13,493 8,995 4,498 80/81 13,524 600 4.436% 1975 13,540 9,027 4,513 81/82 13,687 588 4.296% 1976 13,761 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856% 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 666 4.452% 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 726 4.524% 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 792 4.740% 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 829 4.876% 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 769 4.216% 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18,626 817 4.386% 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 89/90 18,827 871 4.626% 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 858 4.398% 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 91/92 19,893 909 4.569% 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 92/93 21,852 920 4.210% 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93/94 21,624 930 4.301% 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 94/95 24,062 927 3.853% 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 95/96 26,358 954 3.619% 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96/97 24,116 963 3.993% 1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 97/98 20,973 978 4.663% 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 854 3.959% 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 849 3.837% 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 912 3.798% 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 01/02 22,717 846 3.724% 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,622 905 4.186% 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 922 4.186% 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041% Last 5 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 05/06 22,327 955 4.277% year 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 06/07 22,014 941 4.274% Average 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21,835 996 4.562% 4.328% 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 998 Actual 4.487% 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 09/10 22,726 984 <-- Prjctd Average 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 984 <-- Prjctd Average 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11/12 23,723 1027 <-- Prjctd Average 2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 12/13 24,683 1068 <-- Prjctd Average 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 13/14 8,301 . • preliminary number of DOH Source: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health Page 4 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13 Based on 13 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 1001 1004 1007 1010 1013 1016 1018 1021 1024 1027 1030 1033 1036 1 1015 1053 1056 1059 1061 1064 1067 1070 1073 1076 1079 1082 1085 1088 2 1024 1026 1064 1067 1070 1073 1075 1078 1081 1084 1087 1090 1093 1096 3 1048 1044 1046 1084 1087 1090 1093 1096 1098 1101 1104 1107 1110 1113 4 1044 1067 1063 1065 1103 1106 1109 1112 1115 1118 1121 1123 1126 1129 5 1069 1063 1086 1082 1084 1122 1125 1128 1131 1134 1137 1140 1142 1145 6 1096 1083 1077 1101 1097 1099 1136 1139 1142 1145 1148 1151 1154 1157 7 1034 1112 1099 1093 1116 1112 1114 1152 1155 1158 1161 1164 1167 1170 8 1076 1047 1125 1112 1106 1130 1126 1128 1165 1168 1171 1174 1177 1180 9 1256 1377 1349 1426 1414 1408 1431 1427 1429 1467 1470 1473 1476 1478 10 1341 1181 1303 1274 1352 1339 1333 1356 1352 1354 1392 1395 1398 1401 11 1350 1250 1090 1212 1183 1260 1248 1242 1265 1261 1263 1301 1304 1307 12 1352 1265 1165 1005 1127 1098 1176 1163 1157 1180 1176 1178 1216 1219 TOTALS 1 14703 1 14570 I 14527 I 14586 1 14809 I 14913 I 15048 1 15109 1 15185 I 15271 I 15336 I 15408 I 15480 15518 Percent of Gain (0.91)% (0.30)% 0.41% 1.52% 0.70% 0.91% 0.40% 0.51% 0.56% 0.43% 0.47% 0.47% 0.24% Pupil Gain (133) (43) 60 222 104 136 61 76 85 65 72 73 38 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6 Based on 6 Year His ory GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 1013 1028 1044 1059 1074 1089 1104 1120 1135 1150 1165 1180 1196 1 1015 1046 1061 1076 1091 1107 1122 1137 1152 1167 1183 1198 1213 1228 2 1024 1033 1063 1079 1094 1109 1124 1139 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1231 3 1048 1046 1055 1086 1101 1116 1131 1146 1162 1177 1192 1207 1222 1238 4 1044 1080 1078 1087 1118 1133 1148 1163 1179 1194 1209 1224 1239 1255 5 1069 1076 1112 1110 1119 1150 1165 1180 1195 1210 1226 1241 1256 1271 6 1096 1083 1090 1126 1124 1133 1163 1179 1194 1209 1224 1239 1255 1270 7 1034 1107 1094 1101 1137 1135 1144 1175 1190 1205 1220 1236 1251 1266 8 1076 1053 1126 1113 1120 1156 1154 1163 1194 1209 1224 1239 1254 1270 9 1256 1352 1329 1402 1389 1396 1432 1430 1439 1470 1485 1500 1515 1531 10 1341 1202 1298 1275 1349 1335 1342 1378 1377 1385 1416 1431 1446 1462 11 1350 1261 1122 1218 1195 1269 1255 1262 1298 1297 1305 1336 1351 1366 12 1352 1313 1224 1085 1181 1158 1232 1218 1225 1261 1260 1268 1299 1314 TOTALS I 14703 I 14665 I 14682 I 14802 I 15077 I 15270 I 15502 I 15676 I 15878 I 16089 I 16279 I 16485 I 16698 I 16896 Percent of Gain (0.26)% 0.11% 0.82% 1.86% 1.28% 1.52% 1.12% 1.29% 1.33% 1.18% 1.27% 1.29% 1.18% Pupil Gain (38) 16 121 275 194 232 174 202 211 190 207 213 198 prj08- 09.xls Page 5 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT E' "'OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 'i. c DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 K 998 984 984 1027 1068 1 1015 1053 1038 1039 1081 1123 2 1024 1026 1064 1049 1050 1093 1134 3 1048 1044 1046 1084 1069 1070 1113 1154 4 1044 1067 1063 1065 1103 1089 1089 1132 1173 5 1069 1063 1086 1082 1084 1122 1108 1108 1151 1192 6 1096 1083 1077 1101 1097 1099 1136 1122 1123 1165 1207 7 1034 1112 1099 1093 1116 1112 1114 1152 1138 1139 1181 1222 8 1076 1047 1125 1112 1106 1130 1126 1128 1165 1151 1152 1194 1236 9 1256 1377 1349 1426 1414 1408 1431 1427 1429 1467 1452 1453 1496 1537 10 1341 1181 1303 1274 1352 1339 1333 1356 1352 1354 1392 1378 1378 1421 11 1350 1250 1090 1212 1183 1260 1248 1242 1265 1261 1263 1301 1286 1287 12 1352 1265 1165 1005 1127 1098 1176 1163 1157 1180 1176 1178 1216 1202 TOTALS 1 14703 1 14553 1 14490 1 14570 1 14851 Percent of Gain (1.02)% (0.43)% 0.55% 1.93% Pupil Gain (150) (63) 80 281 I _I I I I I I I TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 _ PROJ 09/10 _ PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 _ PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 _ PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 984 984 1027 1068 1 1015 1046 1031 1032 1075 1116 2 1024 1033 1063 1049 1050 1092 1134 3 1048 1046 1055 1086 1071 1072 1114 1156 4 1044 1080 1078 1087 1118 1103 1104 1147 1188 5 1069 1076 1112 1110 1119 1150 1135 1136 1178 1220 6 1096 1083 1090 1126 1124 1133 1163 1149 1150 1192 1234 7 1034 1107 1094 1101 1137 1135 1144 1175 1160 1161 1204 1245 8 1076 1053 1126 1113 1120 1156 1154 1163 1194 1179 1180 1222 1264 9 1256 1352 1329 1402 1389 1396 1432 1430 1439 1470 1455 1456 1499 1540 10 1341 1202 1298 1275 1349 1335 1342 1378 1377 1385 1416 1402 1402 1445 11 1350 1261 1122 1218 1195 1269 1255 1262 1298 1297 1305 1336 1322 1322 12 1352 1313 1224 1085 1181 1158 1232 1218 1225 1261 1260 1268 1299 1285 TOTALS 1 14703 1 14636 14608 1 14712 1 14996 Percent of Gain (0.46)% (0.19)% 0.71% 1.93% Pupil Gain (67) (28) 104 284 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 prj08- 09.xls Page 6 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.13 Based on 13 Year Histor GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ I PROJ 09/10 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ I PROJ 14/15 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 1001 1004 007 1010 1013 1016 1018 11 1 1024 1027 1030 1033 1036 1 1015 1053 1056 1059 1061 1064 1067 1070 1073 1076 1079 1082 1085 1088 2 1024 1026 1064 1067 1070 1073 1075 1078 1081 1084 1087 1090 1093 1096 3 1048 1044 1046 1084 1087 1090 1093 1096 1098 1101 1104 1107 1110 1113 4 1044 1061 1063 1065 1103 1108 1109 1112 1115 1118 1121 , 1123 1128 1129 5 1069 1063 1086 1082 1084 1122 1125 1128 1131 1134 1137 1140 1142 1145 K -5 TOTS 6198 I 6254 I 6319 1 6363 T 6415 I 6467 I 6485 1 6502 I 6520 I 6537 1 6555 I 6572 I 6590 1 6607 Percent of Gair 0.90% 1.04% 0.71 % 0.81 % 0.81 /o 0.27% 0.27°/0 0.27% 0.2 % 0.27% 0.27°/0 0.27% 0.27% Pupil Gain 56 65 45 51 52 18 18 17 18 18 17 18 18 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.6 Based on 6 Year Histor. GRADE ACTUAL PROD PROJ 08/09 I 09/10 I 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PR•J 13/14 PROJ I PROJ 14/15 15/16 PR•J 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 1 PROJ 19/20 l 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 1013 1028 044 TO- 9 10 4 1089 1104 120 ¶135 1150 1165 1180 1196 1 1015 1046 1061 1076 1091 1107 1122 1137 1152 1167 1183 1198 1213 1228 2 1024 1033 1063 1079 1094 1109 1124 1139 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1231 3 1048 1046 1055 1086 1101 1116 1131 1146 1162 1177 1192 1207 1222 1238 4 1044 1080 1078 1087 1118 1133 1148 1163 1179 1194 1209 1224 1239 1255 5 1069 1076 1112 1110 1119 1150 1165 1180 1195 1210 1226 1241 1256 1271 6 year 13 year I 286 409 K -5 TOT! 6198 I 6294 I 6398 1 6481 I 6581 1 6688 1 6779 I 6871 1 6962 1 7053 1 7144 1 7235 - 7327 1 7418 Percent of Gair 1.55% 1.66% 1.30% 1.55% 1.62% 1.36% 1.35% 1.33% 1.31% 1.29% 1.28% 1.26% 1.24% Pupil Gain 96 104 83 100 107 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 6 year 13 year I 581 1220 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year Histor GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 K 998 984 984 1027 1068 1 1015 1053 1038 1039 1081 1123 2 1024 1026 1064 • 1049 1050 1093 1134 3 1048 1044 1046 1084 1069 1070 1113 1154 4 1044 1081 1083 1065 1103 1089 1089 1132 1173 5 1069 1063 1086 1082 1084 1122 1108 1108 1151 1192 K-5 TOT I 6198 1 6237 1 6282 I 6347 1 6457 I j Percent of Garr 0.62% 0.73% 1.03% 1.73% Pupil Gain 39 45 65 110 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year Histor GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ PROJ 12/13 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ I PROJ 19/20 1 20/21 PROJ 21/22 KDG 998 984 984 1027 1068 1 1015 1046 1031 1032 1075 1116 2 1024 1033 1063 1049 1050 1092 1134 3 1048 1046 1055 1086 1071 1072 1114 1156 4 1044 1080 1078 1087 1118 1103 1104 1147 1188 5 1069 1076 1112 1110 1119 1150 1135 1136 1178 1220 K- 5 TOT I 6198 I 6264 I 6324 1 6391 1 6501 j 1 j ) 1 1 Percent of Gair 1.07% 0.96% 1.05% 1.72% Pupil Gain 66 60 66 110 4 year 259 4 year I 303 prj08- 09.xls Page 7 10/20/2008 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJEC TIONS i ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 6 1096 1083 1090 1126 1124 1133 1163 1179 1194 1209 1224 1239 1255 1270 7 1034 1107 1094 1101 1137 1135 1144 1175 1190 1205 1220 1236 1251 1266 8 1076 1053 1126 1113 1120 1156 1154 1163 1194 1209 1224 1239 1254 1270 6 -8 TOT 3206 3243 3310 3340 3381 3424 3462 3516 3577 3623 3669 3714 3760 3805 Percent of Gain 1.15% 2.07% .90% 1.23% 1.27% 1.10% 1.58% 1.74% 1.27% 1.26% 1.24% 1.23% 1.21% Pupil Gain 37 67 30 41 43 38 55 61 46 46 46 46 46 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F "'OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 3MS.13 MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS Based on 13 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ _ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 6 1096 1083 1077 1101 1097 1099 1136 1139 1142 1145 1148 1151 1154 1157 7 1034 1112 1099 1093 1116 1112 1114 1152 1155 1158 1161 1164 1167 1170 8 1076 1047 1125 1112 1106 1130 1126 1128 1165 1168 1171 1174 1177 1180 6 -8 TOT I 3206 I 3242 I 3301 I 3306 I 3319 I 3341 I 3376 I 3419 I 3463 l 3471 I 3480 I 3489 I 3498 I 3506 Percent of Gain 1.13% 1.82% 0.14% 0.40% 0.64% 1.07% 1.26% 1.27% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% Pupil Gain 36 59 5 13 21 36 43 43 9 9 9 9 9 6 year 13 year 170 300 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 6 year 256 13 year I 599 _M GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 6 1096 1083 1077 1101 1097 1099 1136 1122 1123 1165 1207 7 1034 1112 1099 1093 1116 1112 1114 1152 1138 1139 1181 1222 8 1076 1047 1125 1112 1106 1130 1126 1128 1165 1151 1152 1194 1236 6 -8 TOT 3206 3242 3301 3306 3319 3341 3376 3402 3426 3455 3539 - -- Percent of Gain 1.13% 1.82% 0.14% 0.40% 0.64% 1.07% 0.75% 0.71% 0.84% 2.45% Pupil Gain 36 59 5 13 21 36 25 24 29 85 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 6 year 170 10 year 1 333 _r..S GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 6 1096 1083 1090 1126 1124 1133 1163 1149 1150 1192 1234 7 1034 1107 1094 1101 1137 1135 1144 1175 1160 1161 1204 1245 8 1076 1053 1126 1113 1120 1156 1154 1163 1194 1179 1180 1222 1264 6 -8 TOT 3206 3243 3310 3340 3381 3424 3462 3487 3504 3533 3617 -- _ Percent of Gain 1.15% 2.07% 0.90% 1.23% 1.27% 1.10% 0.72% 0.49% 0.82% 2.40% Pupil Gain 37 67 30 41 43 38 25 17 29 85 prj08- 09.xls 6 year 256 10 year] 411 Page 8 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 3SH.13 SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS Based on 13 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 9 1256 1377 1349 1426 1414 1408 1431 1427 1429 1467 1470 1473 1476 1478 10 1341 1181 1303 1274 1352 1339 1333 1356 1352 1354 1392 1395 1398 1401 11 1350 1250 1090 1212 1183 1260 1248 1242 1265 1261 1263 1301 1304 1307 12 1352 1265 1165 1005 1127 1098 1176 1163 1157 1180 1176 1178 1216 1219 9 -12 TOT 5299 I 5074 I 4906 I 4917 I 5075 I 5105 I 5187 I 5188 I 5203 I 5262 I 5301 I 5347 I 5393 I 5405 6 year (112) Percent of Gain (4.25)% (3.30)% 0.22% 3.21% 0.60% 1.61% 0.01% 0.30% 1.13% 0.74% 0.86% 0.87% 0.22% Pupil Gain (225) (167) 11 158 30 82 1 15 59 39 46 46 12 TABLE 3SH.6 SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS Based on 6 Year His ory GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 9 1256 1352 1329 1402 1389 1396 1432 1430 1439 1470 1485 1500 1515 1531 10 1341 1202 1298 1275 1349 1335 1342 1378 1377 1385 1416 1431 1446 1462 11 1350 1261 1122 1218 1195 1269 1255 1262 1298 1297 1305 1336 1351 1366 12 1352 1313 1224 1085 1181 1158 1232 1218 1225 1261 1260 1268 1299 1314 13 year I 106 9 -12 TOT 5299 I 5128 I 4974 I 4981 I 5114 I 5158 I 5261 I 5289 I 5339 I 5413 I 5466 I 5536 I 5612 I 5673 6 year (38) Percent of Gain (3.22)% (3.02)% 0.15% 2.67% 0.86% 2.00% 0.53% 0.94% 1.38% 0.98% 1.28% 1.38% 1.08% Pupil Gain (171) (155) 8 133 44 103 28 50 74 53 70 76 61 TABLE 3SH.13A SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 9 1256 1377 1349 1426 1414 1408 1431 1427 1429 1467 1452 1453 1496 1537 10 1341 1181 1303 1274 1352 1339 1333 1356 1352 1354 1392 1378 1378 1421 11 1350 1250 1090 1212 1183 1260 1248 1242 1265 1261 1263 1301 1286 1287 12 1352 1265 1165 1005 1127 1098 1176 1163 1157 1180 1176 1178 1216 1202 9 -12 TOT I 5299 I 5074 I 4906 I 4917 I 5075 I 5105 I 5187 I 5188 I 5203 I 5262 I 5284 I 5310 I 5376 I 5447 Percent of Gain (4.25)% (3.30)% 0.22% 3.21% 0.60% 1.61% 0.01% 0.30% 1.13% 0.41% 0.50% 1.25% 1.31% Pupil Gain (225) (167) 11 158 30 82 1 15 59 21 26 66 70 6 year (112) TABLE 3S1-1.6A SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 9 1256 1352 1329 1402 1389 1396 1432 1430 1439 1470 1455 1456 1499 1540 10 1341 1202 1298 1275 1349 1335 1342 1378 1377 1385 1416 1402 1402 1445 11 1350 1261 1122 1218 1195 1269 1255 1262 1298 1297 1305 1336 1322 1322 12 1352 1313 1224 1085 1181 1158 1232 1218 1225 1261 1260 1268 1299 1285 13 year I 374 13 year I 148 9 -12 TOT 5299 5128 4974 4981 5114 5158 5261 5289 5339 5413 5436 5462 5522 5592 Percent of Gain (3.22)% (3.02)% 0.15% 2.67% 0.86% 2.00% 0.53% 0.94% 1.38% 0.43% 0.48% 1.09% 1.27% Pupil Gain (171) (155) 8 133 44 103 28 50 74 23 26 60 70 6 year (38) 13 year 293 prj08- 09.xls Page 9 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT E "QOLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 4 PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP KINDERGARTEN GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 __ PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 E.13 998 1001 1004 1007 1010 1013 1016 1018 1021 1024 1027 1030 1033 1036 E.6 998 1013 1028 1044 1059 1074 1089 1104 1120 1135 1150 1165 1180 1196 E.13A 998 984 984 1027 1068 E.6A 998 984 984 1027 1068 6 year 17 91 GRD 1 -- GRD 5 GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 _ PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 13 year 38 198 E.13 5200 5253 5315 5357 5405 5454 5469 5484 5498 5513 5527 5542 5557 5571 E.6 5200 5281 5370 5438 5523 5614 5690 5766 5842 5918 5994 6070 6146 6222 E.13A 5200 5253 5298 5320 5388 E.6A 5200 5281 5340 5364 5432 6 year 269 490 13 year 371 1022 GRD 6 -- GRD 8 GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 __ PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 MS.13 3206 3242 3301 3306 3319 3341 3376 3419 3463 3471 3480 3489 3498 3506 MS.6 3206 3243 3310 3340 3381 3424 3462 3516 3577 3623 3669 3714 3760 3805 MS.13A 3206 3242 3301 3306 3319 3341 3376 3402 3426 3455 3539 MS.6A 3206 3243 3310 3340 3381 3424 3462 3487 3504 3533 3617 6 year 170 256 13 year 300 599 GRD 9 -- GRD 12 GRADE ACTUAL 08/09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 SH.13 5299 5074 4906 4917 5075 5105 5187 5188 5203 5262 5301 5347 5393 5405 SH.6 5299 5128 4974 4981 5114 5158 5261 5289 5339 5413 5466 5536 5612 5673 SH.13A 5299 5074 4906 4917 5075 5105 5187 5188 5203 5262 5284 5310 5376 5447 SH.6A 5299 5128 4974 4981 5114 5158 5261 5289 5339 5413 5436 5462 5522 5592 6 year (112) (38) (112) (38) 13 year 106 374 148 293 DISTRICT TOTALS GRADE ACTUAL 08 /09 PROJ 09/10 PROJ 10/11 PROJ 11/12 PROJ 12/13 PROJ 13/14 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROJ 17/18 PROJ 18/19 PROJ 19/20 PROJ 20/21 PROJ 21/22 3.13 14703 14570 14527 14586 14809 14913 15048 15109 15185 15271 15336 15408 15480 15518 3.6 14703 14665 14682 14802 15077 15270 15502 15676 15878 16089 16279 16485 16698 16896 3.13A 14703 14553 14490 14570 14851 3.6A 14703 14636 14608 14712 14996 6 year 345 799 13 year 815 2193 prj08- 09.xls Page 10 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 5 PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection is under( -) or over Actual = Percent Projection is under( -) or over Actual Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades K - 5 Total 1996 -97 Diff % Total 1997 -98 Diff % Total 1998 -99 Diff % Total 1999 -00 Diff % 2000 -01 Total Diff 2000 -01 Diff ACTUAL 5799 xxx xxx 5946 xxx xxx 5837 xxx xxx 5856 xxx xxx 5844 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5843 44 0.76% 5928 (18) (0.30)% 6049 212 (0.54)% 5778 (78) 3.15% 5811 (33) (0.56)% Prj 3E.6 5821 22 0.38% 5904 (42) (0.71)% 6026 189 (0.96)% 5735 (121) 2.74% 5664 (180) (3.08)% Prj 3E.13A 5853 54 0.93% 5783 (163) (2.74)% 5936 99 (2.64)% 5811 (45) 1.51% 5919 75 1.28% Prj 3E.6A 5798 (1) (0.02)% '5768 (178) (2.99)% 5917 80 (2.93)% 5785 (71) 1.15% 5895 51 0.87% Grades 6 - 8 Total 1996 -97 Diff % Total 1997 -98 Diff % Total 1998 -99 Diff % Total 1999 -00 Diff % Total 2000 -01 Diff % ACTUAL 2799 xxx xxx 2811 xxx xxx 2860 xxx xxx 2970 xxx xxx 2980 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 2875 76 2.72% 2820 9 0.32% 2910 50 (2.64)% 2927 (80) (2.62)% 3023 43 1.44% Prj 3E.6 2848 49 1.75% 2789 (22) (0.78)% 2878 18 (2.70)% 2895 (75) (2.46)% 3009 29 0.97% Prj3E.13A 2875 76 2.72% 2820 9 0.32% 2910 50 (2.64)% 2927 (80) (2.62)% 3023 43 1.44% Prj 3E.6A 2848 49 1.75% 2789 (22) (0.78)% 2878 18 (2.70)% 2895 (75) (2.46)% 3009 29 0.97% Grades 9 - 12 Total 1996 -97 Diff % Total 1997 -98 Diff % Total 1998 -99 Diff % Total 1999 -00 Diff % Total 2000 -01 Diff % ACTUAL 3843 xxx xxx 4012 xxx xxx 4245 xxx xxx 4225 xxx xxx 4311 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 3768 (75) (1.95)% 4092 80 1.99% 4110 (135) 2.74% 4301 76 (0.32)% 4369 58 1.35% Prj 3E.6 3750 (93) (2.42)% 4069 57 1.42% 4103 (142) 1.51% 4313 88 (1.49)% 4394 83 1.93% Prj 3E.13A 3768 (75) (1.95)% 3983 (29) (0.72)% 4110 (135) 2.74% 4301 76 (0.32)% 4369 58 1.35% Prj 3E.6A 3750 (93) (2.42)% 3970 (42) (1.05)% 4103 (142) 1.51% 4313 88 (1.49)% 4394 83 1.93% All Grades Total 1996 -97 Diff % Total 1997 -98 Diff % Total 1998 -99 Diff % Total 1999 -00 Diff % Total 2000 -01 Diff % ACTUAL 12441 xxx xxx 12769 xxx xxx 12942 xxx xxx 13051 xxx xxx 13135 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 12486 45 0.36% 12840 71 0.56% 13069 127 (0.30)% 13006 (45) 0.97% 13203 68 0.52% Prj 3E.6 12419 (22) (0.18)% 12762 (7) (0.05)% 13007 65 (0.82)% 12943 (108) 0.50% 13067 (68) (0.52)% Prj 3E.13A 12496 55 0.44% 12586 (183) (1.43)% 12956 14 (1.44)% 13039 (12) 0.10% 13311 176 1.34% Prj 3E.6A 12396 (45) (0.36)% 12527 (242) (1.90)% 12898 (44) (1.89)% 12993 (58) (0.33)% 13298 163 1.24% prj08- 09.xls Page 11 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F "ROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 5 PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection is under( -) or over Actual = Percent Projection is under( -) or over Actual Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades K - 5 Total 2001 -02 Diff % Total 2002 -03 Diff % Total 2003 -04 Diff % Total 2004 -05 Diff % 2005 -06 Total Diff % ACTUAL 5914 xxx xxx 5741 xxx xxx 5774 xxx xxx 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5827 (87) (1.47)% 5723 (18) (0.31)% 5655 (119) (0.49)% 5761 26 0.45% 5750 (137) (2.33)% Prj 3E.6 5802 (112) (1.89)% 5735 (6) (0.10)% 5662 (112) (0.34)% 5821 86 1.50% 5795 (92) (1.56)% Prj 3E.13A 5839 (75) (1.27)% 5743 2 0.03% 5605 (169) (1.24)% 5709 (26) . (0.45)% 5750 (137) (2.33)% Prj 3E.6A 5831 (83) (1.40)% 5776 35 0.61% 5631 (143) (0.81)% 5756 21 0.37% 5784 (103) (1.75)% Grades 6 - 8 Total 2001 -02 Diff % Total 2002 -03 Diff % Total 2003 -04 Diff % Total 2004 -05 Diff % 2005 -06 Total Diff % ACTUAL 3049 xxx xxx 3151 xxx xxx 3294 xxx xxx 3274 xxx xxx 3169 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 3025 (24) (0.79)% 3185 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (8.86)% 3295 21 0.64% 3132 (37) (1.17)% Prj 3E.6 3011 (38) (1.25)% 3192 41 1.30% 3216 (78) (6.06)% 3311 37 1.13% 3137 (32) (1.01)% Prj 3E.13A 3025 (24) (0.79)% 3185 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (8.88)% 3295 21 0.64% 3132 (37) (1.17)% Prj 3E.6A 3011 (38) (1.25)% 3192 41 1.30% 3216 (78) (6.06)% 3311 37 1.13% 3137 (32) (1.01)% ■ Grades 9 - 12 Total 2001 -02 Diff % Total 2002 -03 Diff % Total 2003 -04 Diff % 2004 -05 Total Diff % 2005 -06 Total Diff % ACTUAL 4498 xxx xxx 4535 xxx xxx 4634 xxx xxx 4663 xxx xxx 5032 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 4455 (43) (0.96)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 (4) 5.90% 4783 120 2.57% 4898 (134) (2.66)% Prj 3E.6 4476 (22) (0.49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4639 5 3.69% 4769 106 2.27% 4880 (152) (3.02)% Prj 3E.13A 4455 (43) (0.96)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 (4) 5.90% 4783 120 2.57% 4898 (134) (2.66)% Prj 3E.6A 4476 (22) (0.49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4639 5 3.69% 4769 106 2.27% 4880 (152) (3.02)% All Grades Total 2001 -02 Diff % Total 2002 -03 Diff % Total 2003 -04 Diff % Total 2004 -05 Diff % Total 2005 -06 Diff % ACTUAL 13461 xxx xxx 13427 xxx xxx 13672 xxx xxx 13672 xxx xxx 14088 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 13307 (154) (1.14)% 13485 58 0.43% 13499 (173) (1.27)% 13839 167 1.22% 13780 (308) (2.19)% Prj 3E.6 13289 (172) (1.28)% 13521 94 0.70% 13542 (130) (0.95)% 13901 229 1.67% 13812 (276) (1.96)% Prj 3E.13A 13319 (142) (1.05)% 13505 78 0.58% 13447 (225) (1.65)% 13787 115 0.84% 13780 (308) (2.19)% Prj 3E.6A 13318 (143) (1.06)% 13562 135 1.01% 13510 (162) (1.18)% 13836 164 1.20% 13801 (287) (2.04)% prj08- 09.xls Page 12 10/20/2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2008 TABLE 5 PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection is under( -) or over Actual % = Percent Projection is under( -) or over Actual Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades K - 5 Total 2006 -07 Diff % Total 2007 -08 Diff % Total 2008 -09 Diff % Average Diff Average ok ACTUAL 6033 xxx xxx 6142 xxx xxx 6198 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5871 (162) (2.69)% 6085 (57) (0.93)% 6179 (19) (0.31)% (22) (0.22)% Prj 3E.6 5921 (112) (1.86)% 6138 (4) (0.07)% 6237 39 0.63% (26) (0.27)% Prj 3E.13A 5869 (164) (2.72)% 6059 (83) (1.35)% 6129 (69) (1.11)% (41) (0.72)% Prj 3E.6A 5912 (121) (2.01)% 6094 (48) (0.78)% 6172 (26) (0.42)% (36) (0.62)% Grades 6 - 8 Total 2006 -07 Diff % Total 2007 -08 Diff % Total 2008 -09 Diff % Average Diff Average ok ACTUAL 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 3131 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32% 3179 (27) (0.84)% (0) (0.80)% Prj 3E.6 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34)% (5) (0.68)% Prj 3E.13A 3131 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32% 3179 (27) (0.84)% (0) (0.80)% Prj 3E.6A 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34)% (5) (0.68)% Grades 9 - 12 Total 2006 -07 Diff % Total 2007 -08 Diff % Total 2008 -09 Diff % Average Diff Average % ACTUAL 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5085 (156) (2.98)% 5190 (130) (2.44)% 5129 (170) (3.21)% (24) 0.30% Prj 3E.6 5086 (155) (2.96)% 5192 (128) (2.41)% 5155 (144) (2.72)% (22) (0.03)% Prj 3E.13A 5085 (156) (2.98)% 5190 (130) (2.44)% 5129 (170) (3.21)% (33) 0.09% Prj 3E.6A 5086 (155) (2.96)% 5192 (128) (2.41)% 5155 (144) (2.72)% (29) (0.22)% All Grades Total 2006 -07 Diff % Total 2007 -08 Diff % Total 2008 -09 Diff % Average Diff Average ok ACTUAL 14418 xxx xxx 14559 xxx xxx 14703 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 14087 (331) (2.30)% 14382 (177) (1.22)% 14487 (216) (1.47)% (41) (0.27)% Prj 3E.6 14153 (265) (1.84)% 14446 (113) (0.78)% 14587 (116) (0.79)% (48) (0.34)% Prj 3E.13A 14085 (333) (2.31)% 14356 (203) (1.39)% 14437 (266) (1.81)% (69) (0.59)% Prj 3E.6A 14144 (274) (1.90)% 14402 (157) (1.08)% 14522 (181) (1.23)% (66) (0.59)% prj08- 09.xls Historical Data is grouped by K - 5, 6 -8, 9 -12 articulation pattern. Articulation pattern has no numeric impact on efficacy of projection models. Page 13 10/20/2008 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections -March 2009 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE ASSUMPTIONS: 1 Uses Build Out Estimates received from developers. 2 Student Generation Factor are updated Auburn data for 2009 as allowed per King County Ordinance 3 Takes area labeled Lakeland East slated for 2007 and divides across 2010 -12 4 Takes area labeled Kersey Project slated for 2005 and divides across 20010 -15 5 Takes area labeled Bridges (Kent Impoundment) and projects across 2009 -2014 6 Includes known developments in N. Auburn, Lea Hill and Non - Lakeland developments (see Development Growth) Student Generation Factors 2009 Auburn Factors Single Family Multi - Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Total 0.3200 0.1520 0.1580 0.0790 0.0340 0.0420 0.6300 0.1550 Table 1 Auburn School Distr Development 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Lakeland Single Family Units Lea Hill Area Other Single Family Units Total Single Family Units Projected Pupils: 110 120 120 120 70 85 100 125 160 155 60 50 150 150 145 140 51 470 695 746 240 255 370 I 395 305 295 I 51 1911 Elementary Pupils K -5 77 82 118 126 98 94 16 612 Mid School Pupils 6 -8 36 39 56 60 46 45 8 290 - Sr. High Pupils 9 -12 38 40 58 62 48 47 8 302 . Total K -12 151 161 233 249 192 186 32 1204 Lakeland Multi Family Units Other Multi Family Units Total Multi Family Units Projected Pupils: 13 83 0 48 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 163 96 48 32 0 0 0 0 176 Elementary Pupils K -5 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 44 Mid School Pupils 6 -8 3 2 1 0 0 0 1,9 Sr. High Pupils 9 -12 4 2 1 Total K -12 15 7 5 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 80 Total Housing Units 336 303 402 395 305 295 51 I 2087 Elementary Pupils K -5 84 85 121 126 98 94 16 " 625 Mid School Pupils 6 -8 40 40 57 60 46 45 8 296 Sr. High Pupils 9 -12 42 42 60 62 48 47 8 309 Total K -12 166 168 238 249 192 186 32 1231 Cumulative Projection Elementary - Grades K -5 Mid School - Grades 6 - 8 Senior High - Grades 9 - 12 Total 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 84 40 42 170 80 84 291 137 144 417 198 206 515 244 255 609 289 301 625 296 309 166 334 572 821 1013 1199 1231 Buildouts Nlarch 09 + ND3.6 ave projections 4Y Buildout Data for Enrollrr- it Projections -March 2009 TABLE 2 New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed by Grade Level Grade 03 -04 04 -05 05 -06 06 -07 6 Year Percent of average 6yr Ave ok KDG 922 892 955 941 1012 1002 1031 1049 998 1058 1014 1072 1372 1400 1322 1147 996 995 1019 997 1057 1078 1007 1057 1033 1337 1368 1352 1263 GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 992 Enroll. & Level 6.94% 3 996 918 1002 998.67 7.04% 4 KDG 951 6.70% 998 11 22 38 55 68 80 82 1 988 6.96% 1015 12 23 40 57 71 83 86 2 985 6.94% 42.01% 1024 12 23 40 57 70 83 85 3 999 7.04% 1048 12 24 40 58 71 84 87 4 1009 7.11% 1044 12 24 41 58 72 85 88 5 1031 7.26% 1069 12 24 42 60 74 87 89 6 1049 7.39% 1096 12 25 42 61 75 89 91 7 1065 7.50% 22.53% 1034 12 25 43 62 76 90 92 8 1083 7.63% 1076 13 26 44 63 77 92 94 9 1380 9.72% 1256 16 32 56 80 99 117 120 10 1334 9.40% 35.46% 1341 16 31 54 77 95 113 116 11 1212 8.54% 1350 14 29 49 70 87 102 105 12 1106 7.80% 1352 13 26 45 64 79 93 96 Totals 14190 100.00% Total 14703 166 334 572 821 1013 1199 1231 TABLE 3 6 year Historical Data Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level Grade 03 -04 04 -05 05 -06 06 -07 07 -08 08 -09 6yr Ave ok KDG 922 892 955 941 1012 1002 1031 1049 998 1058 1014 1072 1372 1400 1322 1147 996 995 1019 997 1057 1078 1007 1057 1033 1337 1368 1352 1263 998 1015 1024 1048 1044 1069 1096 1034 1076 1256 1341 1350 1352 950.67 6.70% 1 982 960 963 987.83 6.96% 2 909 992 963 984.83 6.94% 3 996 918 1002 998.67 7.04% 4 947 1016 939 1008.67 7.11% 5 1018 957 1065 1030.83 7.26% 6 1111 1020 1004 1049.33 7.39% 7 1131 1124 1028 1064.67 7.50% 8 1052 1130 1137 1083.33 7.63% 9 1473 1461 1379 1379.67 9.72% 10 1249 1261 1383 1333.67 9.40% 11 1010 1055 1182 1211,83 8.54% 12 902 886 1088 1106.33 7.80% Totals 13702 13672 14088 14418 14559 14703 14190.33 100.00% % of change change +1- - 0.22% 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99% -30 416 330 141 144 Buildouts March 09 + ND3.6 ave projections 45 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections -March 2009 TABLE 4 ND 3.13 New Projects - Pupil by Grade Level Projection Cumulative Updated March 2009 Uses a 'cohort survival' model assuming 100% of previous year new enrollees move to the next grade level. Kindergarten calculates previous years number plus current generation based on % of total enrollment. Other use 100% cohort survival. GRADE 2008 -09 Actual 2009 -10 Projected 2010 -11 Projected 2011 -12 Projected 2012 -13 Projected 2013 -14 Projected 2014 -15 Projected 2015 -16 Projected KDG 1 2 3 4 5 K -5 6 7 8 GR 6 -8 9 10 11 12 998 1015 1024 1048 1044 1069 1012 1064 1038 1056 1079 1075 1026 1079 1087 1070 1087 1110 1045 1098 1106 1124 1106 1124 1065 1119 1127 1145 1161 1144 1080 1135 1143 1161 1178 1196 1096 1151 1159 1177 1194 1212 1101 1156 1164 1182 1199 1217 6198 6324 1 6459 I 6604 I 6760 I 6893 1 6988 1 7019 1096 1034 1076 1096 1124 1060 1102 1124 1150 1143 1136 1156 1157 1178 1169 1174 1188 1207 1225 1204 1217 1230 1244 1222 3206 3280 1 3377 1 3435 1 3504 I 3569 1 3647 1 3696 1256 1341 1350 1352 1394 1197 1264 1278 1381 1334 1119 1191 1482 1328 1260 1050 1494 1429 1253 1191 1506 1434 1347 1177 1547 1446 1350 1269 1547 1472 1347 1259 GR 9 -12 Total 5299 5133 5025 5120 5366 5464 5612 5625 14703 14736 14861 15159 15630 15926 16247 16340 % of change change +/- 0.22% 0.85% 2.00% 3.11% 1.89% 2.02% 0.57% 33 125 298 471 296 321 93 TABLE 5 ND 3.6 New Projects - Pupil by Grade Level Projection Cumulative Updated March 2009 Uses a 'cohort survival' model assuming 100% of previous year new enrollees move to the next grade level. Kindergarten calculates previous years number plus current generation based on % of total enrollment. Other use 100% cohort survival. GRADE 2008 -09 Actual 2009 -10 Projected 2010 -11 Projected 2011 -12 Projected 2012 -13 Projected 2013 -14 Projected 2014 -15 Projected 2015 -16 Projected 2016 -17 Projected 2017 -18 Projected KDG 1 2 3 4 5 K -5 6 7 8 GR 6 -8 9 10 11 12 GR 9 -12 998 1015 1024 1048 1044 1069 1024 1057 1044 1058 1092 1088 1051 1084 1087 1078 1102 1136 1082 1116 1118 1126 1128 1152 1114 1149 1151 1159 1176 1178 1142 1177 1179 1187 1205 1223 1170 1205 1207 1216 1233 1252 1187 1223 1225 1233 1251 1269 6198 6364 I 6538 I 6722 1 6926 I 7114 7283 I 7388 1096 1034 1076 1095 1120 1065 1114 1119 1152 1168 1144 1157 1185 1199 1182 1208 1211 1233 1252 1234 1246 1270 1267 1257 3206 3280 1 3385 1 3469 I 3566 I 3652 I 3732 1 3794 1256 1341 1350 1352 1368 1218 1275 1326 1361 1330 1151 1250 1458 1329 1267 1130 1469 1426 1265 1245 1495 1431 1355 1237 1549 1455 1358 1325 1550 1494 1367 1314 1200 1237 1239 1247 1265 1284 7472 1284 1282 1271 3837 1568 1511 1383 1329 1214 1251 1253 1261 1279 1298 7556 1299 1296 1285 3880 1585 1528 1399 1344 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 5687 5726 5791 5857 Total 14703 14831 15016 15374 15898 16284 16701 16907 17099 17293 of change change +/- Buildouts March 09 + ND3.6 ave projections 0.87% 1.24% 128 18 -.v 2.39% 3.40% 2.43% 2.57% 1.23% 1.14% 1.14% 359 523 386 418 206 192 Buildout Data for Enrollrr' 't Projections -March 2009 TABLE 6 ND3.13A New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative by Grade Level Updated March 2009 2.02% 1.14% Uses a 'cohort survival' model assuming 100% of previous year new enrollees move to the next grade level. Kindergarten calculates birth rate average plus current generation based on % of total enrollment. Other use 100% cohort survival. GRADE 2008 -09 Actual 2009 -10 Projected 2010 -11 Projected 2011 -12 Projected 2012 -13 Projected 2013 -14 Projected 2014 -15 Projected 2015 -16 Projected KDG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 998 1015 1024 1048 1044 1069 995 1007 1065 1123 1064 1062 1079 1139 1193 1038 1087 1089 1107 1163 1217 1056 1070 1124 1127 1142 1197 1241 1079 1087 1106 1161 1161 1175 1219 1075 1110 1124 1144 1196 1195 1198 6198 6306 I 6422 I 6587 I 6802 I 5854 I 4784 I 3658 1096 1034 1076 1096 1102 1143 1157 1174 1225 1213 1124 1124 1136 1178 1188 1204 1244 1060 1150 1156 1169 1207 1217 1222 3206 3280 I 3377 I 3435 I 3504 I 3569 I 3647 I 3679 1256 1341 1350 1352 1394 1381 1482 1494 1506 1547 1547 1197 1334 1328 1429 1434 1446 1472 1264 1119 1260 1253 1347 1350 1347 •1278 1191 1050 1191 1177 1269 1259 5299 5133 5025 5120 5366 5464 I 5612 I 5625 Total 14703 14719 14824 15142 15672 % of change change +/- 0.11% 0.72% 2.14% 3.50% 16 105 318 530 TABLE 7 ND 3.6A New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative by Grade Level Updated March 2009 Uses a 'cohort survival' model assuming 100% of previous year new enrollees move to the next grade level. Kindergarten calculates birth rate average plus current generation based on of total enrollment. Other use 100% cohort survival. Based on 6 year history GRADE 2008 -09 Actual 2009 -10 Projected 2010 -11 Projected 2011 -12 Projected 2012 -13 Projected 2013 -14 Projected 2014 -15 Projected 2015 -16 Projected KDG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 998 1015 1024 1048 1044 1069 995 1007 1065 1123 1057 1055 1072 1132 1187 1044 1087 1089 1107 1162 1217 1058 1078 1126 1129 1143 1199 1243 1092 1102 1128 1176 1175 1189 1234 1088 1136 1152 1178 1223 1222 1225 6198 6334 I 6465 I 6631 I 6845 I 1096 1034 1076 1095 1114 1168 1185 1208 1252 1240 1120 1119 1144 1199 1211 1234 1267 1065 1152 1157 1182 1233 1246 1257 3206 3280 I 3385 1 3469 I 3566 I 3652 I 3732 I 3764 1256 1341 1350 1352 1368 1361 1458 1469 1495 1549 1550 1218 1330 1329 1426 1431 1455 1494 1275 1151 1267 1265 1355 1358 1367 1326 1250 1130 1245 1237 1325 1314 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 I 5687 1 5726 Total 14703 14802 14942 15284 15817 % of change change +/- 0.67% 0.95% 2.29% 3.49% 99 141 342 533 Buildouts March 09 + ND3.6 ave projections 47 Auburn S-'-ool District Development Growtt, e 1/1/03 March, 2009 SINGLE FAMILY Development Name ni s Parcels urren Occupancy o =e Occupied Alder Meadows 30 30 0 As•en Meadows 21 21 0 Auburn Place 14 14 0 Bifrost Gate 52 52 0 Cambrid. a Pointe 26 23 3 Canterber Crossin• 20 20 0 C stal Court 13 13 0 Dawson Hills 6 6 0 Hazel Park 15 15 0 Kelli Meadows 8 8 0 Kin • sle Meadows 56 56 0 Lakeland: Montiano 104 104 0 Lakeland: The Reserve 80 80 0 Lakeland: Tuscan 76 76 0 Lakeland: Verona South 400 400 0 Lakeland: Verona North 181 181 0 LeeAnn Meadows 23 23 0 Little Fields 8 8 0 Marchini Meadows IMEWECHEMIIII Pacific Meadows 83 83 0 6 6 0 44 44 0 Pacific View 34 34 0 River Park Estates 18 18 0 River Rim 11 11 0 Sera Monte 33 33 0 Valle View Estates 8 8 0 Vinta•e Hills, Division 6 61 61 0 Vinta•e Hills, Division 7 20 20 0 Washin•ton National, Div 1 42 42 0 Totals Elem Middle HS Total Student Generation Factors em IMIIIMILM o a 4 4 4 12 0.133 0.133 0.133 0.400 11 9 6 26 0.524 0.429 0.286 1.238 5 3 3 11 0.357 0.214 0.214 0.786 32 14 21 67 0.615 0.269 0.404 1.288 9 3 0 12 0.391 0.130 0.000 0.522 7 0 4 11 0.350 0.000 0.200 0.550 5 6 5 16 0.385 0.462 0.385 1.231 4 2 3 9 0.667 0.333 0.500 1.500 26 18 11 55 1.733 1.200 0.733 3.667 2 1 2 5 0.250 0.125 0.250 0.625 25 19 18 62 0.446 0.339 0.321 1.107 19 5 7 31 0.183 0.048 0.067 0.298 19 7 7 33 0.238 0.088 0.088 0.413 35 15 10 60 0.461 0.197 0.132 0.789 79 35 31 145 0.198 0.088 0.078 0.363 41 16 19 76 0.227 0.088 0.105 0.420 9 3 6 18 0.391 0.130 0.261 0.783 1 2 3 6 0.125 0.250 0.375 0.750 31 9 21 61 0.373 0.108 0.253 0.735 4 2 2 8 0.667 0.333 0.333 1.333 19 12 11 42 0.432 0.273 0.250 0.955 5 4 3 12 0.147 0.118 0.088 0.353 5 0 2 7 0.278 0.000 0.111 0.389 5 3 2 10 0.455 0.273 0.182 0.909 8 2 0 10 0.242 0.061 0.000 0.303 4 1 1 6 0.500 0.125 0.125 0.750 36 21 19 76 0.590 0.344 0.311 1.246 18 6 6 30 0.900 0.300 0.300 1.500 9 4 8 21 0.214 0.095 0.190 0.500 477 226 235 938 0.320 0.152 0.158 0.630 49 SINGLE FAMILY Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/03 March, 2009 2009 Currently Under Constr Development Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Beaver Meadows 60 12 48 Cambridge Pointe 26 23 3 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 32 44 Lakeland: Vista Heights 125 89 36 Riversointe 118 71 47 Trail Run 169 64 105 283 2009 and up Under Construct Development Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 Brandon Place 78 0 78 Bridges 386 0 386 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 Cam -West 99 0 99 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 Dal'it Dhaliwal Plat 8 0 8 Estes Park 31 0 31 Hargreet Kan. 8 0 8 Hazel Hei. hts 22 0 22 Hazel View 20 0 20 Kendall Ridge 106 0 106 Kerse 3 Pro'ect 373 0 373 Lakeland: East Phase 1 130 0 130 Lakeland: East Phase 2/3 340 0 340 Lawson Place 14 0 14 Megan's Meadows 9 0 9 Mountain View Estates 29 0 29 New Hose Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 Sgencer Place 13 0 13 Sti. g Plat 29 0 29 Vintage Place 25 0 25 Willow Place 18 0 18 YatE 3t 16 0 1' 1911 2194 Elem Middle HS Total Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 0 2 0 2 15 7 8 30 9 3 0 12 1 0 0 2 6 4 4 14 14 7 7 28 17 4 4 25 12 5 6 23 12 8 11 31 15 7 7 30 3 4 0 7 34 16 17 66 6 91 43 45 178 50 Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 10 5 5 20 4 2 2 9 2 1 1 4 18 8 9 35 25 12 12 49 124 59 61 243 6 3 3 11 32 15 16 62 8 4 4 15 3 1 1 5 10 5 5 20 3 1 1 5 7 3 3 14 6 3 3 13 34 16 17 67 119 57 59 235 42 20 21 82 109 52 54 214 4 2 2 9 3 1 1 6 9 4 5 18 3 1 1 5 4 2 2 8 9 4 5 18 8 4 4 16 6 3 3 11 5 2 10 702 333 3-..., 1381 Auburn S'ool District Development .vth since 1/1/03 March, 2009 MULTI FAMILY Development Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Butte Estates 29 29 0 Cox/Woodward TH 8 8 0 Lakeland: Cain i 168 168 0 Lakeland: Carrara 170 170 0 Lakeland: Palermo Pots 362 362 0 Lakeland: Siena 101 101 0 Lakeland: Sorano 79 79 0 Pasa Fino II 19 19 0 Seasons at Lea Hill Villa•e 332 332 0 0.059 1268 1268 0 2009 and be and Development Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Lakeland: Madera 70 57 13 Pacific Ave Du.lexes 12 8 4 Trail Run Townhomes 115 36 79 "D" Street Plat 32 0 32 Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 0.625 277 101 176 51 Elem Middle HS Total Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 8 6 4 18 0.276 0.207 0.138 0.621 1 3 1 5 0.125 0.375 0.125 0.625 4 2 1 7 0.024 0.012 0.006 0.042 5 1 4 10 0.029 0.006 0.024 0.059 19 7 20 46 0.052 0.019 0.055 0.127 5 0 1 6 0.050 0.000 0.010 0.059 1 1 1 3 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.038 2 1 1 4 0.105 0.053 0.053 0.211 55 22 20 97 0.166 0.066 0.060 0.292 100 43 53 196 0.079 0.034 0.042 0.155 Elem Middle HS Total Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 6 3 3 12 3 1 1 5 4 2 2 7 14 6 7 27 POLICY /TEXT AMENDMENT #2 Kent School District Updated 2009 -2010 to 2014 -2015 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Kent School District Updated 2009 -2010 to 2014 -2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Adopted by the Kent School District Board of Directors June 2009) 2009 - 2010 ° 2014 a 2015 New'Panther.Lake Elementary'School open in Fall 2009 Kent School-District No. 415 provides educationa[service to Residents of "Unincorporated King County and Residents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton Black Diamond, Map[e'1la!ley, and Sea(ac, Washington April 2009 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030 -6643 (253) 373 -7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 - 2010 - 2014 - 2015 KENT scHoa DISTRICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Jim Berrios Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Chris Davies Debbie Straus ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H. High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Merri Rieger, Ed.D. — Assistant Superintendent, Learning & School Improvement Larry Miner — Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement 7 — 12 Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 6 David Staight — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 6 Becky Hanks — Executive Director, Community Connections Charles Lind — Executive Director, Labor Relations & Legal Services Laura Madeo — Executive Director of Instructional Services Thuan Nguyen — Chief Information Officer Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 -2010 — 2014 -2015 April 2009 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373 -7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher - Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fosjord, Transportation Manager Maps by Jana Tucker, Printing Services Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Six-Year Capital Facilities Ilan 7abk of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2. I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 I I I District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 ✓ Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 ✓ I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 ✓ III Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 31 X Appendixes 32 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 I Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan ") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District ") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2009 for the 2008 -2009 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior Tong -term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee - implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P -223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year. P -223 Headcount for October 1, 2008 was 26,831. P -223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,827.82. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2008 full head count was 27,579. (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 3 11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) 8.48% of 22,874 King County live births in 2004 is projected for 1,940 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2009. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.48% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six -year period. (See Table 2) State Funded Full Day-Kindergarten ( "FDK ") programs required a revision to the methodology for projecting Kindergarten at 1.0 FTE for qualifying schools. Schools with half -day Kindergarten programs and the optional Tuition -based FDK are projected at .50 FTE. (See Table 2A) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students ") are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six -year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of Renton, SeaTac, and Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (Continued) April 2009 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .445 Middle School .118 Senior High .245 Total .808 Multi - Family Elementary .296 Middle School .075 Senior High .111 Total .482 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,878 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi - family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER P 223 F T E (Full Time Equivalent) ENROLLMENT HISTORY 1 LB = Live Births LB in 1985 LB In 1906 LB in 1987 LB in 1988 LB In 1889 LB In 1890 L8 in 1991 LB in 1992 LB In 1993 L8 in 1994 LB in 1995 LB in 1998 LB In 1997 LB In 1998 LB in 1999 L8 In 2000 LB in 2001 LB in 2002 LB in 2003 riora- aw- .....M rrnirec us, sysrrErw.ar•_••- •_1- ,•••-.• -- -m..A. a:.iawVan,rz`s:,.,c3.3.114 1x.,1 wrvn2.icyxw.g.`... --"7GarraCmnrnV.+r:8sie itR:rA.trSXVISZ-aulintae ahm3K.Z easi677.EM ARVIM,vileuemma:i aw s Pra li.e14aaa- vurnz..arara.......0r._ October FTE Enrollment 1990 '"R.C3r,. 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 .K ....Z.3..A.d e.t/ iRM:irWi1,.'.....01.3k V•.SY',IV3. -S, .....RA •SSP(aKA_lT'Jf.9.:W14...t.,yg{ dip] a:J,Y+G9f1+ "a.dE341mssa QtnnIal av - 1..-GS,..91.71,4C7.4. T..Y1serrA 111i N .1,17.74Ol,:fC+;A.C....eraTASR, KW% Mi... King County Live Births 2 19,825 19.999 20,449 21,289 22.541 23,104 23,002 23,188 22,355 22,010 21,817 21,573 21,646 22,212 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 Increase! Decrease 851 174 450 840 1,252 563 -102 186 -833 -345 -193 -244 73 566 - 205 480 -709 85 568 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.88% 9.49% 9.40% 9.07% 8.47% 8.54% 8.44% 8.38% 8.27% 8.56% 8.25% 8.41% 8.06% 8.05% 8.33% 8.41% 8.22% 8.29% 8.48% Kindergartent 2 3 880 949 962 965 955 987 971 972 925 942 900 907 873 894 917 943 895 906 768 State Funded Full Day Kindergarten 1-2.3 365 Grade 1 1,852 1,945 2,029 2,017 1,967 1,975 2,152 2,085 2.064 1,989 2,069 1,936 1,922 1,851 1,954 1938 2003 1873 1920 Grade 2 1,773 1,944 1,998 2,048 1,937 2,011 1,979 2.194 2,095 2,078 2,015 2,067 1,936 1,965 1,935 1981 1998 2045 1916 Grade 3 1,824 1.866 1,950 1,972 1,965 1,959 2,025 2,058 2,208 2,111 2,098 2,040 2,055 1,975 2,020 1962 2026 2033 2081 Grade 4 1,793 1,916 1,900 1,939 1,942 2,012 1,966 2,064 2,045 2,222 2,086 2,166 2,068 2.072 2,057 2024 2015 2049 2060 Grade 5 1,702 1,865 1,911 1,907 1,899 1,924 1,988 2,023 2,108 2,037 2,251 2,109 2,149 2,067 2,102 2090 2051 2020 2044 Grade 6 1,629 1,733 1,885 1,951 1,915 1,895 1,924 2,036 2,045 2,119 2,056 2,253 2,151 2,205 2,139 2164 2101 2098 2081 Grade 7 1,624 1,720 1,812 1,915 1,946 1,925 1,899 1,982 2,063 2,081 2,208 2,127 2.380 2,209 2,243 2200 2205 2130 2117 Grade 8 1,545 1,628 1,724 1,799 1,882 1,941 1,927 1,936 1,970 2,015 2,033 2,154 2,079 2,351 2,221 2293 2254 2184 2143 Grade 9 - Junior High 1,483 1,612 1,689 1,716 1,800 1,894 1,963 1,931 1,925 2,102 2,208 2,246 2,404 Grade 9 - Senior High 2,309 2,705 2767 2772 2560 2573 Grade 10 1,468 1,480 1,663 1,698 1,690 1,765 1,851 1,977 1,953 2,045 2,113 2,064 2,039 2,207 2,124 2173 2212 2474 2245 Grade 11 1,360 1,400 1,409 1,537 1,529 1,606 1,681 1,797 1,849 1,782 1,770 1,835 1,823 1,787 1,907 1799 1881 1882 1966 Grade 12 1,202 1,255 1,290 1,340 1.368 1,430 1,465 1,507 1,632 1,537 1,432 1,440 1,475 1,466 1,446 1475 1451 1491 1549 Total Enrollment 4 20,135 21,312 22,222 22,803 22,794 23,323 23,792 24,560 24,882 25,060 25,238 25,344 25,354 25,358 25.770 25,809 25,864 25,745 25,828 Yearly FTE Increase 916 1,178 909 582 -10 529 469 768 322 178 178 106 9 4 412 39 55 -119 83 Cumulative Increase 916 2,094 3,003 3,585 3,575 4,104 4,574 5,341 5,663 5,841 6,019 6.126 6,135 6,140 6,552 6,591 6.646 6,527 6,610 1 FTE enrollment counts have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Most Kindergarten students are reported at .5 FTE although most elementary schools now provide some fut day Kindergarten programs. 2 This number indicates actual births In King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by King Co Health Dept. KSD percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 3 Starting in 2008, Kindergarten students are reported at 1.0 (same as headcount) at 5 schools which qualified for Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) funded through State Apportionment See Table 2A for FD Kindergarten detail. For Full Day Kindergarten at other schools, the second half of the day Is funding by grants or tuition and the students are still reported at .5 FTE on the P -223 Enrollment Report which generates state apportionment funding. 4 Enrollment reported to the state on Form P -223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Education ("ECE' & 'sr or Birth to 2 Preschool Special Education) and college-only Running Start students. October 2008 P -223 Headcount = 26,831 & Full Headcount = 27,579. Full Headcount Includes Kindergarten, Early Childhood Education & college -only Running Start students at 1.0 Headcount. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 April 2009 Page 6 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR F T E ENROLLMENT PROJECTION State Funded FDK at 14 schools L8 in 2003 LB in 2004 LB In 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB est 08 LB est 09 October 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .rl s': ,r� _ `..l :S: :RAi�; � .ia: \QT .iD.Iw ... '. fY: }ii '?S `Ni�...: .•ii.VC•∎ ::i0Y?4,3,V.Z1'alrya_'�T:rA 1• "1 C:� t L. 'Sy '$�r a..�:a 4f1 -�1 "1 iV:i"1'..ti �•u'k•',l.a .l King County Live Births' 22,431 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,000 25,100 ' Increase / Decrease 568 443 -194 1,564 655 101 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.48% 8.48% 8.48% 8.48% 8.48% 8.48% 8.48% 213 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 768 479 471 537 565 569 573 2(3 FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 365 982 982 982 982 982 982 Grade 1 1,920 2,021 2,081 2,054 2,183 2,232 2,230 Grade 2 1,916 1,961 2,083 2,145 2,117 2,249 2,299 Grade 3 2,081 1,971 1,989 2,122 2,184 2,156 2,289 Grade 4 2,060 2,073 2,001 2,029 2,163 2,226 2,198 Grade 5 2,044 2,065 2,085. 2,023 2,051 2,185 2,248 Grade 6 2,081 2,091 2,110 2,140 2,077 2,106 2,242 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 2,117 2,096 2,111 2,130 2,160 2,097 2,426 2,143 2,131 2,129 2,144 2,163 2,193 2,130 2,573 2,497 2,507 2,505 2,522 2,544 2,579 2,245 2,249 2,210 2,219 2,227 2,232 2,251 1,966 1,841 1,889 1,857 1,864 1,871 1,875 1,549 1,661 1,662 1,705 1,676 1,683 1,689 Total FTE Enrollment 25,828 26,118 26,310 26,592 26,934 27,325 27,711 Note: 2 / 314 Yearly Increase 83 290 192 282 342 391 386 Yearly Increase /Decrease % 0.32% 1.12% 0.74% 1.07% 1.29% 1.45% 1.41% Cumulative Increase 83 373 565 847 1,189 1,580 1;966 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. 2 Kindergarten FTE projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 1.0 FTE for 14 schools qualifying for Grant & State Apportionment Funded Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) Schools with 1/2 Day Kindergarten and Optional Tuition -based Full Day Kindergarten programs are projected at .5 FTE. 4 Oct. 2008 P223 FTE is 25,828 & Headcount is 26,831. Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,579. • 'Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 25,828 126,118 26,310 26,592 I 26,934 I 27,325 1 27,711 tr; • 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. 2 Kindergarten FTE projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 1.0 FTE for 14 schools qualifying for Grant & State Apportionment Funded Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) Schools with 1/2 Day Kindergarten and Optional Tuition -based Full Day Kindergarten programs are projected at .5 FTE. 4 Oct. 2008 P223 FTE is 25,828 & Headcount is 26,831. Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,579. • G R O W T H ... .. ... _ ,... . PROJECTIONS • - Ad-ustments for current economic factors . For facilities planning purposes, this six -year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2009 Page 7 KENT SCHOOL IISTRICT No. 415 CAPACITY of ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS & KINDERGARTEN PROJECTIONS for October 2009 2008 -2009 Program ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ABR Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary Gtenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary CC CV CO CW EH EP FW DE GR GL HE JC Kent Elementary KE Lake Youngs Elementary LY Martin Sortun Elementary MS Meadow Ridge Elementary MR Meridian Elementary ME Millennium Elementary ML Neely- O'Brien Elementary NO Panther Lake Elementary PL Park Orchard Elementary PO Pine Tree Elementary PT Ridgewood Elementary RW Sawyer Woods Elementary SW Scenic Hill Elementary SH Soos Creek Elementary SC Springbrook Elementary SB Sunrise Elementary SR 452 402 498 456 464 504 408 450 456 452 504 398 464 524 474 464 524 498 440 396 480 522 504 504 464 408 398 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,012 28 Elementary Schools 2 Note 1: KAI = Kindergarten Academic Intervention at ML & PT: FDK Program for qualified Kindergarten students & 1/2 Day Kindergarten for remainder of Kindergarten students. Note 2: 12 schools have State Funded FDK projected at 1.0 FTE - 2 schools have KAI FDK @.1.0 & 1/2 Day K @ .5 - 14 have Optional Tuition -based &/or 1/2 Day Kindergarten all projected at .5 FTE. 1.0 FTE Forecast for 1.0 Funded State Apportionment FDK 1.0 FTE Forecast for 1.0 Funded I - 728 FDK 1.0 FTE .5 FTE Forecast Forecast for for 1.0 Funded 0.50 Funded Title I Kindergarten 1 KAI FDK 1/2 Day .5 FTE Forecast for 0.50 Funded Optional Tuition -Based 1/2 Day (& FDK) .5 FTE Forecast for 0.50 Funded Basic Ed 1/2 Day K Only Oct -09 Projected Kindergarten Students FTE Elem Schl Abry Code @ 1.0 @ .50 58 - 34 37 36 58 34 37 36 CC CV CO CW 98 71 30 34 98 71 30 34 EH EP FW DE 50 32 19 33 50 32 19 33 GR GL HE JC 79 96 83 22 79 96 83 22 KE LY MS MR 31 40 102 82 31 25 ME ML NO PL 102 82 40 25 20 16 71 71 20 16 36 35 PO PT RW SW 36 35 76 56 23 36 76 56 23 36 SH SC SB SR 380 542 60 41 292 146 982 479 x 2 ■ 6 6 2 9 5 958 1940 HdCnt Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilijies-Plan Table 2 A April 2009 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long -term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 22 students. Class size for grades 1 - 4 is planned for an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 is planned for an average of 29 students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third /fourth or fourth /fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self - contained classroom with a capacity of 10 -15 depending on the program. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 (continued) Page 9 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self- contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3 -4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior - disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC -DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT /PT) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI -Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull -out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 8 is planned for an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class is planned for an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 9 - 12 is planned for an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self - contained classroom with a capacity of 10 -15 depending on the program. (contd.) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -media & Technology Labs & Programs — (Nova Net - Advanced Academics) Technology Academy programs at Kent - Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Transition Outreach Program (TOP) for 18 -21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate ( "I B ") Program Kent Phoenix Academy — Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE- Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w /Children /Educ., etc. Health & Human Services — Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education — Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders), Sales & Marketing, Economics, Web Design Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer -aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades 3 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull -out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue dose analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,321 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,552. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13) The ratio between permanent capacity and transitional capacity has changed from 96 - 4% to 97 - 3% since the previous Plan. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and new capacity for building additions at the high schools. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview Elementary) serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non - traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. KPA has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent - Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS 2008 -2009 Program Capacity 1 Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 1971 CV 26500 Timbertane Way SE, Covington 98042 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 452 402 498 456 East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 464 504 408 450 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary .1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 474 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 464 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 498 Neely -O 'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South. Kent 98030 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 804 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS (former Kent Jr Hi) 2 2005 / 1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 828 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street. Renton 98058 972 Middle School TOTAL 5,207 Kent - Meridian Senior High School Kentlake Senior High School Kentridge Senior High School Kentwood Senior High School Senior High TOTAL Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 1965 MV /LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 1966 PH 11000 SE 2641h Street, Kent 98030 DISTRICT TOTAL 1,772 2,157 2,270 2,137 LEM I 27,321 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools. 2 Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005. S Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 3 -12. The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementary. ` Kent Phoenix Academy is a non - traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2009 Page 13 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan > N 0 co ca co co W 0 0 SE Petrovltsk S 212th St • Kent Mountain View Academy Neely O'Brien Elementary • %,, Kent Elementary m I es Rd 0 VJ `4r m 0 c U Springbrook Elementary • Panther Lake Elementary East Hill Elementary •MiIl Creek • MidICI a School Kent - Meridian High School• Scenic Hill • T, Elementary < L 0 W y Q L 0 Carriage Crest Elementary • • Meeker • Middle Sc Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School • SE 208th St 'airwood ementary • hool Lake •Youngs Elementar Emerald Park Elementary • Soos Creek• Elementary /Park Orchard Elementary • Meridian •Middle School fl\J *Sunrise Elementary SE 240th St Daniel • Elementary Martin • Sortun Elementary • Administration • Center Kent Phoenix Academy • Millennium Elementary Meadow gage Elemen ary • • Pine Tree Elementary SE 256th St • Meridian Elementary Ridgewood Elementary • 1•vI Northwood Middle School Lake Desire Kent School District No. 415 Serving residents of Unincorporated King County City of Kent City of Renton City of Auburn City of Sea Tac City of Covington City of Maple Valley City of Black Diamond Lake Youngs SE 240th St N 0 > Mattson Middle Scho • • • Kentwood High School sI Crestwood Elementary Lake Meridian Horizon • Elementary N 0 '0 c N 155 Cedar Valley Elementary • Jenkins Creek • Cedar Heights Elementary • Middle School Kent - Kangley Road • Covington Elementary Grass Lake • Elementary SE Govin9ton- SawYerR , 28 Elementary Schools 6 Middle Schools 4 Senior High Schools Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3 -12) Kent Phoenix Academy (9 -12) Lake Morton SE 272nd St Lake Sawyer Kentlake• High School Sawyer Woods. Elementary V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2009, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in Kent School District: • Construction is in progress for additional classroom capacity at Kent - Meridian High School and has recently been completed at Kentlake High School. • Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured to provide capacity for approximately 350 high school students at the non - traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy in 2007 -08. • Kent Junior High was renovated and renamed Mill Creek Middle School. Mill Creek MS also serves the Kent Technology Academy program for students in Grades 7 - 8. The construction of Phase I I of the renovation of Mill Creek MS is in progress. • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future Elementary School to accommodate new growth. A new site was acquired and construction is in progress for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary. The new Panther Lake will open to replace the current school in Fall 2009. • Planning is in progress for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision - makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus pull -outs and turn - arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table 4 on Page 16 & Site map on Page 17) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION 1 Type Status # on Map ELEMENTARY , ' i.,_ _ .ti } ;. . +t 'r is Projected Projected % for Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) SE 216th Street & 102nd Ave SE PL Elementary Site (F) SE 216th Street & 102nd Ave SE Panther Lake Elementary - Replaced in 2009 SE 208 Street & 108th Ave SE 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary (U) SE 256th Street & 154th Ave SE Covington Elem - Replacement planned for 2011 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary # 31 (Actual #29) (F) To be determined 2 Site for Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) To be determined 2 MIDDLE SCHOOL Mill Creek Middle School Phase II of Renovation Sequoia Middle School SENIOR HIGH New Non - traditional High School Kent Phoenix Academy (Funded) Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) Classroom additions at Kent- Meridian HS (F) TEMPORARY FACILITIES Relocatables SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded) # on Map 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) 5 Covington area West (Halteson- Wikstrom) 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site) 12 South Central site (Plemmons- Yeh -Wms) Replacement Site Replacement Replacement Replacement New Site Construction Fall 2009 500 21% 2009 21% Planning 2009 -396 Planning 2011 600 20% Planning 2011 -498 Planning 2012 -13 600 100% Planning 2012 -13 100% 620 N. Central Avenue, Kent Renovation construction 2009 828 NIA In progress Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 - 771 NIA for Kent Phoenix Academy Former Sequoia Middle School 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent For placement as needed Renovation Additions Additions New Near Kent - Meridian High School New SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 SE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 SE 286th Street & 124th Ave. SE, Kent Utilized Utilized In progress 2007 -08 2008 2009 Planning 2008+ Planning TBD 2 350 100% 171 100% 79 100% Additional Capacity 24.31 each 100% N/A Type Land Use Jurisdiction Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Secondary Elementary TBD 2 TBD 2 City of Covington King County City of Covington King County King County King County King County King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and /or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 17. Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 27. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2009 Page 16 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan h 0 c SE 192nd St SE Petrovitsky Rd 108th Ave SE Springbrook Elementary S 212th St Kent Mountain View Academy m Neely O'Brien Elementary. Iley Highway Kent Elementary. c 0 U w 0 t orriage Cres Elementary. Meeker • Middle School Glenridge Elementary Fairwood Elementary 0 Ridgewood Elementary • Northwood Middle School • Lake Desire Lake Youngs • Elementary Kentridge High School • SE 208th St /anther Lot Elementary Panther Loke Replocement Emerald Park Elementary • Soos'Creek Elementary (I) Xark Orchard Elementary • East Hill Elementary •Mal Creek • addle School Daniel• Kent- Elementary Meridian High School • 132nd Ave SE • Meridian Middle School SE 240th St w N Scenic Hill," m Elementary t 0 SE 288th Street Martin Sortun Elementary • Sunrise Elementary SE 256th St Lake Youngs SE 240th St Kent School District No. 415 Site Bank M Property Acquisitions Mattson Middle Scho .restwood Elementary Administration Center Kent • oenix Academy Millennium Elementary Meadow Ridge rw .Elementary m •Pine Tree Q Elementary a c • Meridian Elementary Lake Meridian -Kentwood High School 6 Cedar Valley Elementary • Jenkins Creek. Elementary Pipe Lake Cedar Heights • Middle School SE 272 nd St Horizon • Elementary Kent - Kangley Road • Covington stoA Elementary Grass Lake 0 Elementary Bi0o4 S. Covington - sawyer O4 • SE 304th Street Lake Morton Kentlake • High School Sawyer Woods Elementary • 0 SE 336th St Lake Sawyer V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity /facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 128 relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and several for storage or other purposes. (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of additional full day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six -year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school -age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational . restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 18 V I I Projected Six Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section 1 V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts.. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 20 - 23) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P -223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2008 was 25,827.82. Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although many schools provide full day kindergarten ( "FDK ") with alternative funding for the second half of the day. State - funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and project some Kindergarten students at 1.00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools. P -223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education (preschool) students and College -only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B-C on pages 20 - 23) In October there were 679 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at 10 -20 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 334 of these students attended classes only at the college ( "college- only ") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P -223 Headcount for October 2008 Was 26,831 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2008 totals 27,579 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5A -B -C on Pages 20 - 23) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT ,.3evaszrzi 24,12 :, +;4saar;.riri+evoaf,/�nMPAYD, 7111)6 0 173 :erli^acrZraartZo4.,:.r >seVAMADZ .IMCWIZ ssAValeae: WEitaL 2elt srssia n.:5;214: 0•-a SCHOOL YEAR 2008 -2009 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 '. Actual P R 0 J E C T E D 1 3S :x1Ca.E'MMIMa4{,EfA.KasmlXarTP, OOLL.'T702'..fn2%.1AL +(.314!DNS,n:SCAINZWItlY,s. 2=45. E c.- . -Mdar+ B+ <^' " ";tv:. ^ATiM'a¢narrn .s.�eaJfsn6:x^.M r;G`4F Permanent Program Capacity 1 CChanges to Permanent Capacity 1 I 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 27,606 28,206 28,206 Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent - Meridian HS (F) 79 Mill Creek MS Renovation - No new Capacity 2 Replacement schools with projected increase in capacity Panther Lake Elementary 3 (Funded) To Replace current school capacity 500 -396 Covington Elementary 3 (Unfunded) 600 To Replace current school capacity -498 New Elementary # 3i (Funded) 600 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal' 27,321 27,504 27,504 27,606 28,206 28,206 28,206 (Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 Middle School Relocalable Capacity Required 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required Total Relocatable Capacity Required 1 8.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 27,321 27,624 27,792 28,014 28,302 28,686 29,046 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 5 25,828 26,118 26,310 26,592 26,934 27,325 27,711 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,493 1,506 1,482 1,422 1,368 1,361 1,335 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Phase I I of renovation continues for Mill Creek Middle School & Kent Technology Academy. (No new capacity added.) 3 Replacement schools for Panther Lake & Covington Elementary will be built on new sites with increased capacity. a In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which increased capacity available at Middle School 7 - 8 grade levels. 5 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projections (i.e. 1/2 day Kindergarten student = .5 & Full Day Kindergarten student = 1.0 FTE). 6 2008 -2009 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,552. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2009 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 tOa faart=EU.iksatatifia ;.51KIX. r an;'4ncV:=Urge?ai- MILFa°.iaja 70s1�./M74,1Wfa o r r ` s ,-= , ,• u, awue �axc SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Actual P R 0 J E C T E D „ K.. �,.... m.,_.... nA, �,,.,.:+9.,e- ,2s,,.,�,,r�a-�:. ..�. - �n�sac:2-s¢rr•.�a��;i3ssa� n,.r sac., aoe�caeair� ,v`. aM1CLSZVV..l,.:S;i3ffs,M .t,fY eY.F�.lst7irvli- Senior High Permanent Capacity' Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 Changes to High School Capacity 8,515 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent - Meridian HS 79 and KM Technology Academy 3 (F) Subtotal 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8;765 FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION a 8,333 8,248 8,268 8,286 8,289 8,330 8,394 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY Number of Relocatables Required 353 517 497 479 476 435 371 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables required at this time. Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. 0 0 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as a new non - traditional high school, and re- opened in Fall 2007 as Kent Phoenix Academy serving grades 9 - 12 with four special programs. 3 KM added a new high school Technology Academy program in 2007 serving students in grades 9 - 10 in 2008 -09. FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or projections, excluding College -only Running Start students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2009 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 iiS !Ci.x,, mint ".3`.3L'1zrAgn trw.,70Y.,ustrarkyL'finntirinc .i,J.^.L::;...curiS'' SCHOOL YEAR my4i3usTRA.75Xv"i.mo.14 2008 -2009 ?e 37346 z r sha -4.. `+�Ta "n•• . S3,0g.•.'Ii:3:.✓in"rawr,z.14- 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 Actual P R 0 J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 Changes to Middle School Capacity 4 Mill Creek MS & Kent Technology Academy are open during Phase 2 of Renovation (No new capacity added in renovation) 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Subtotal 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 . F ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 TE 4,260 4,227 4,240 4,274 4,323 4,290 4,256 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 5 947 980 967 933 884 917 951 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time. Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and re- opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas. Phase I I of Mill Creek renovation continues in 2008 -09 and the school is open during construction. 5 Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2009 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 tEAkmcu;coswarrorwavown? rs,tcoavvsiS_'4'arueeh,xtT'. gnau.,,maseumbR £C2 "" -xs • • �Tsma,4asc 7..:Si1]Aarstriifii"'sta SLi18w ieo.f.z.: i.26- _TuP3?5i wtiP SCHOOL YEAR 2008 -2009 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Actual P R 0 J E C T E D W '"° 3ll423NR IZ_ CA RI CL i1.771X'.IAC'ti-.C+I.tS2.51th :TZ N58e''Si*.4uA 'OURN= LW lYT.a :4W5....9XNaLC_ rSSS.i1Mna_ 'd^a 1C=3 Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,012 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,634 14,234 14,234 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement schools with projected increase in capacity Panther Lake Elementary 4 (Funded) Replaces current school capacity 500 -396 Covington Elementary 4 (Unfunded) 600 Replaces current Covington Elem. capacity -498 New Elementary # 31 (Funded) 5 600 Subtotal 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,634 14,234 14,234 14234 Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,428 13,652 13,820 14,042 14,330 14,714 15,074 FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,235 13,643 13,802 14,032 14,322 14,705 15,061 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 193 9 18 10 8 9 13 Number of Relocatables Required 0 5 13 17 4 35 Classroom Relocatables required in 2014 -15. Some additional Relocatables used for program purposes. 20 35 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 3 - 12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. s FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections (Kindergarten @ .5 or 1.0 & excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE for Half Day Kindergarten programs or optional Tuition -based Full Day Kindergarten. Kindergarten projection is at 1.0 FTE for Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by state apportionment or grants. 4 Replacement schools for Panther Lake & Covington Elementary will be built on new sites with increased capacity. 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary #31 is pending review of location and capacity needs. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C Apnl 2009 Page 23 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2009 - 2010 through 2014 - 2015. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. The bond issue partially funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students from junior high to senior high schools in September 2004. The District received some District Equalization funds (formerly known as "state matching funds ") and has utilized impact fees for the senior high additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth. The new Panther Lake Elementary School is under construction and will be open in Fall 2009. The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a new non - traditional high school. Kent Phoenix Academy opened at the former Sequoia Middle School site in September 2007. 2006 construction funding approval also provided for some additional classrooms to be constructed at Kentlake and Kent - Meridian High Schools. Some impact fees will be utilized for the new construction that will increase capacity. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26 -27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 24 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN -., ',_,'.. ,-',Y.--,•,4-,-.1:-7-:' - '..,4,-..., '4, :1,,,, ;,. ,-,.. -1- ;4-: ;-, 4,0' -r.3.$,,4"fr•,',7.i..;':--...e.',■.;•-_-r ',r, ".1;gp,:?!;:z:::,N:'- ':',;,..e"',,,,,ce,,== ,./i-1::;,1;:t,'s ' 'r,_:=7,.',.::,, C-1-z,z6n.,,z, .r..-.:.$%Pf.-:-,r,7,,, ':):k.s.'i,'‘...:4 , ,.:-,-;;;-... ,...... ,: .-", ,,,, ,,.,- -_ T.,' tr:.,'X,',...:.-:;-1.,:".%:..."-1: 's• ' ' T " . ', ' t'-"Zi.:‘,,tWZ: :9 .i..--r-::, ":— ,"' '''''' '-'■''''.;s- --,'-':;:.'in..; - .;Z:,...,.'.:.L: -!..--._:' 0 '...-.:-.. .';'.'.. .)'' . ' ,-,-‘,..r.e•re..,571.,'■;.. Secured Unsecured State 2 or Local 3 Impact Fees SCHOOL FACILITIES * 2009 2010 2011 . 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL -,:, Local & State --.: ,■-■ .:."_::'''''..t ':_°;.fg:-.-V-7,' :::::';',..;:t.:Pati?''f'i:Vat.'15`;';;;35.3-1"‘''t:::'■--e" '...?; tei147-„W2:t1:7%:::,.Aqe-rg,7-&;Z;z5f.A3',IT`:;'Wkt;,t44;;;:V:Vili.24-.k.r:oag:4-AY.;:2*.3'Zt.:..liti,14C:e3-,:nV.,t4i. aCt7141. ;11;:lagiiier;P. PERMANENT FACILITIES $5,700,000 $2,500,000 $26,700,000 $4,485,013 $28,900,000 $30,320,000 $2,500,000 5246,860 $259,200 2 relocatables 2 relocatables ::... ,.t. -.,. 55,700,000 $1,700,000 $4,000,000 ..;- $1,000,000 51,500,000 $2,500,000 ;... 1- =.' $26,700,000 $21,093,000 $5,607,000 .‘; i= $4,485,013 53,543,160 $941,853 A, ,,. U8,900,000 $1,850,000 $21,270,000 $5,780,000 $30,320,000 514,000,000 55,600,000 510,720,000 •t, .3- 52,500,000 $2,500,000 '' 4 • •.--, 5506,060 579,000 $427,060 1.1 '- '.. .... .. Addition to Kentlake HS 1- 2 Addition to Kent-Meridian HS 1-2 Panther Lake Elem Replacement 1 3 Panther Lake Elementary Site Covington Elementary Replacement 1 Elementary # 31 1-2-3 Elementary Site 3 F F F F U F U TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Relocatables 3 4 F U OTHER N/A Totals 539.385,013 5246,860 $29,159,200 532,820,000. $0 $0 $101,611,073 $43,265,160 $26,870,000 $31,475,913 * F = Funded U = Unfunded 1 Based on estimates of actual or future construction 2 The District anticipates receiving some state 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of 4 Cost of Relocatables based on current cost 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of costs from Facilities Department. (See Page 25 for Cost Basis Summary) matching funds for these projects. these projects may be funded with impact fees. and adjusted for Inflation for future years. fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent Scht. trict Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Tab April 2009 F 5 V III Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary #30 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (To open in 2009) $26,700,000 Projected cost - Covington Elementary Replacement (Projected to open in 2011) $28,900,000 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2012 $30,320,000 Average cost of Covington Elem. replacement & Elementary #31 $29,610,000 Construction cost of the additions to two high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total 2008 Addition to Kentlake High School $5,700,000 2009 Addition to Kent - Meridian HS $2,500,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $8,200,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Ran April 2009 Page 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Elementary 13 / Urban Panther Lake Elementary Replacement Site 5 / Urban Elementary Site (Halleson & Wikstrom) Year Open / Purchased Location Acreage Cost Avg cost/acre Total Average Cost / Acre 2008 102xx SE 216, Kent 98031 9.40 $4,485,013 $477,129 2004 15435 SE 256 St, Covington 98042 10.00 $1,093,910 $109,391 Elementary Site Subtotal 19.40 $5,578,923 Middle School Urban Northwood Middle School 1996 17007 SE 184 St, Renton 98058 24.42 $655,138 $26,828 10 / Urban Mill Creek MS (Kent JH) / McMillan St. assemblage 2002 411 -432 McMillan St., Kent 98032 1.23 $844,866 $686,883 12 / Urban So Central Site - Unincorp KC (Plemmons, Yeh, Wms) 1999 E of 124 SE btw 286 -288 PI (UKC) 39.36 $1,936,020 $49,188 Middle School Site Subtotal 65.01 $3,436,024 Senior High 11 / Urban K -M High School Addition (Kent 6 & Britt Smith) 2002 & 2003 10002 SE 256th Street 6.31 $3,310,000 $524,564 Senior High Kentlake High School (Kombol Morris) 1997 21401 SE 300 St, Kent 98042 40.00 $537,534 $13,438 6 / Urban Kentwood Sr Hi Addition (Sandhu) 1998 16807 SE 256th Street 3.83 $302,117 $78,882 Senior High Site Subtotal 50.14 $4,149,651 Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 1996 1 So. King County Activity Center (Nike site) purchased prior to 1996. 4 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 1984 3 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard) 1992 7 / Rural Site - South of Covington (Scarsella) 1993 8 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West) 1993 2 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers- Blaine- Drahota- Paroline) 1995 9 Old Kent Elementary replaced and currently leased out. Kent Scho. .strict Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tat.. $287,573 Elem site average $52,854 Middle Schl Site Avg. $82,761 Sr HI Site Average Total Acreage & Cost 134.55 $13,164,598 Total Average Cost / Acre $97,842 April 2009 age 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi - Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.445 Elementary 0.296 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.118 Middle School 0.075 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.245 Senior High 0.111 Total 0.808 Total 0.482 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 600 Elementary 90 Middle School 900 Middle School 117 Senior High 250 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary Senior High (required) 32 Middle School Senior High $287,573 $0 $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary * $29,610,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 Senior High * $8,200,000 Middle School @ 29 * See cost basis on Pg. 26 Senior High @ 31 $123,430 $0 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Equalization Credit (iormehy "State Match•) Elementary 73,748 Current District Equalization Percentage Middle School 18,544 Senior High 22,960 Total 3% 115,252 Area Cost Allowance ACA - Cost/Sq. Ft. Area Cost Allowance (Effective July 08) $168.79 55.78% Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 660,904 Senior High 1,121,963 Total 97% 3,258,803 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $348,876 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,549,684 Multi - Family Residence $121,557 Middle School 679,448 Apartments 71% Condos 29% Senior High 1,144,923 Total 3,374,055 Capital Levy Tax Rate /$1,000 Current / $1.000 Tax Rate (1.73255) $1.73 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.96% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor IRequired Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity 1 Student Factor I A 1 (Elementary) A 2 (Middle School) A 3 (Senior High) 11 21 32 $287,573 $0 $0 600 1,065 1,000 0.445 0.118 0.245 0.808 A Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost I Facility Capacity r Student Factor I Footage Ratio I $2,346.12 $0 $0 $2,346.12 B 1 (Elementary) B 2 (Middle School) B 3 (Senior High) $29,610,000 $0 $8,200,000 600 900 250 0.445 0.118 0.245 0.808 0.97 0.97 0.97 B Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor 1 Footage Ratio I $21,301.93 $0 $7,794.92 $29,096.85 C 1 (Elementary) C 2 (Middle School) C 3 (Senior High) $123,430 $0 $0 24 29 31 0.445 0.118 0.245 0.808 District Equalization Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match ") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Equalization % x Student Factor IArea Cost Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I Equalization % I Student Factor I 0.03 0.03 0.03 C $68.66 $0 $0 $68.66 D 1 (Elementary) D 2 (Middle School) D 3 (Senior High) $168.79 $168.79 $168.79 90 117 130 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 Current Bond Interest Rate Years Amortized (10 Years) Developer Provided Facility Credit Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal $31,511.62 D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal $11,445.12 0.5578 0 0.5578 0.445 $3,770.75 0.118 $0 0.245 $2,998.71 D $6,769.46 $348,876 $1.73 4.96% 10 TC b $4,675.66 Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 $2,346.12 $29,096.85 $68.66 $6,769.46 $4,675.66 0 Total Unfunded Need $20,066.50 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment (See Page 26 tor explanation) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan FC b 0 $10,033 0 ($4,639) $5,394 April 2009 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi- Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor A 1 (Elementary) A 2 (Middle School) A 3 (Senior High) Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre 1 Facility Capacity 1 Student Factor 11 21 32 $287,573 $0 $0 500 1,065 1,000 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.482 A -0 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi - Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) IConstruction Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio I B 1 (Elementary) B 2 (Middle School) B 3 (Senior High) $1,872.68 50 50 $1,872.68 $29,610,000 50 $8,200,000 600 900 250 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.482 0.97 0.97 0.97 B b Temporary Facility Cost per Multi - Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) C 1 (Elementary) C 2 (Middle School) C 3 (Senior High) 514,169.37 $0 53,531.58 $17,700.95 Facility Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio I 5123,430 $0 $0 24 29 31 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.482 District Equalization Credit per Multl- Family Residence (formerly "State Match ") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Equalization % x Student Factor IArea Cost Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student 1 Equalization % I Student Factor 1 0.03 0.03 0.03 C D 1 (Elementary) D 2 (Middle School) D 3 (Senior High) Tax Credit per Multi $45.67 50 50 $45.67 $168.79 $168.79 5168.79 90 117 130 - Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 Current Bond Interest Rate Years Amortized (10 Years) Developer Provided Facility Credit Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi- Family Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit Subtotal D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal 0.5578 0 0.5578 0.296 $2,508.18 0.075 50 0.111 51,358.60 D K' $3,866.78 $121,557 51.73 4.96% 10 TC b $1,363.29 I Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units I 0 $1,872.68 $17,700.95 $45.67 53,866.78 $1,363.29 Total Unfunded Need 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment (See Page 28 for explanation) Net Fee Obligation per Multi- Family Residence Unit Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 0 519,619.29 $5,230.07 $14,389.22 FC b $7,195 0 (53,873) $3,322 April 2009 Page 30 0 IX Summary of Changes to April 2008 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan ") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2008 Plan are summarized here. Projects in progress include replacement and expansion of Panther Lake and Covington Elementary schools, a future new elementary school, classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation for Kent Phoenix Academy and Phase II of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class size and extended learning opportunities for Student Achievement Initiative 728 are reflected in this update. Changes in relocatables or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and /or movement between facilities. Permanent and temporary facility ratio has changed from 96 — 4% to 97 — 3 %. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Six -year Kindergarten projections were modified to meet the requirements for State Funded Full Day Kindergarten programs. The district expects to receive some state equalization (formerly "matching ") funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Biennieal update of student generation rates was reported last year. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Single Family (SF) Student Generation Factor Multi- Family (MF) District Equalization Ratios (former State Match) Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) Average Assessed Valuation (AV) AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Impact Fee - Single Family Impact Fee - Multi- Family Elem 0.445 0.445 No Change — Update in 2010 MS 0.118 0.118 SH 0.245 0.245 Total 0.808 0.808 No Change — Biennial Update Elem MS SH Total SF MF SF MF 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.482 57.06% $168.79 $316,091 $102,465 $1.73 5.11% $5,304 $3,266 No Change — Update in 2010 0.482 No Change — Biennial Update Per OSPI Website Per OSPI Website Per Puget Sound ESD Per Puget Sound ESD 55.78% $168.79 $348,876 $121,557 $1.73 4.96% $5,394 $3,322 Per King Co. Assessor Report Market Rate Change to fee + $90 Change to fee + $56 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 31 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 32 0:E0E- KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY • INVENTORY of RELOCATABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT K S D ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Number of Std/I-ligh Cap 2SE / IP 2 Special • 2008-2009 Program Classroom . . . Relocatable , „ , , 10/1/2008 , ., - , -,. 10/1/2008 r. • , F Std or High Cap Capacity ELL Program Program Use Use Capacity 4 P223 FTE P223 Hdcount D Classrooms at 24 average ' CR Cepaci Capacity 2 Relocatables Relocatables at 24 average ' Enrollment Enrollment K 8 • al Carriage Crest Cedar Valley Covington Crestwood East Hill Emerald Park Fairwood George T. Daniel Bern Glenridge Grass Lake Horizon Jenkins Creek Kent Elem. Lake Youngs Martin Sortun Meadow Ridge Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely-O'Brien Panther Lake Park Orchard Pine Tree Ridgewood Sawyer Woods Scenic Hill Soos Creek SprIngbrook Sunrise Kent Mtn. View Academy MV IElementary TOTAL 3 CC CV/e CO/e CW EH EP FW/s DE GR GL/h HE JC KE/eh LY/h MS MR/e MEM ML NO PL PO FT/h RW/h SW SH SC/e SB SR/h 18 16 20 19 17 21 17 18 19 18 21 15 17 21 19 17 21 20 16 15 18 21 21 21 17 17 15 21 14 432 384 480 456 408 504 408 432 456 432 504 360 408 504 456 408 504 480 384 360 432 504 504 504 408 408 360 504 358 5 8 5 2 7 2 3 5 4 4 2 7 8 7 3 6 3 3 5 3 7 4 1 2 6 4 5 2 3 20 18 18 0 58 0 0 18 0 20 0 38 56 20 18 56 20 18 56 36 48 18 0 0 56 0 38 0 60 452 402 498 456 464 504 408 450 456 452 504 398 464 524 474 464 524 498 440 396 480 522 504 504 464 408 398 504 416 1 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 2 1 3 3 2 0 0 3 0 5 7 2 3 1 0 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 48 0 24 96 48 0 120 0 0 0 48 0 24 0 0 0 0 445.38 326.50 518.50 474.50 527.00 465.50 406.17 502.11 428.20 420.53 501.36 362.09 541.00 497.07 485.50 445.04 493.03 530.50 850.15 482.50 467.03 460.00 494.08 465.66 502.00 374.50 371.03 529.50 68.65 480 358 557 510 576 498 442 503 457 440 536 388 541 520 532 447 522 576 709 517 468 484 531 501 502 397 401 565 73 530 12,740 122 688 13,428 61 22 528 Elementary classroom capacity is based on average of 24: 18-22 in K-3, 23 in Grade 4 & 2 Kent School District Standard of Service reserves some rooms for pull-out programs. ie. 3 Elementary schools have 100% space utilization rate. 4 Elementary FTE reports Kind @ 5 FDK = Full Day Kindergarten T = Tuition-based I =1-728 Funded Schoolwide K = KAI Kent Schc ict Slx-Year Capital Facilities Plan 13,235.08 14,027 29 in Grades 5-6. Includes adjustments for class size reduction or program changes. 20 Total = 17 Standard + 1 Computer Lab + 1 Music + 1 Integrated Program classroom. .5 FDK @ 1.0 - P223 Headcount reports Kindergarten @ 1.0. Excludes ECE preschoolers. Title I Funded A = State Apportionment Funded H = Half Day Kindergarten only APPE' A T T 1 T T A T H A H A T K K A K T A T T 0 April 2009 Pf KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of RELOCATABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT # of Standard SE / IP Special Ed Spec Special 1 2008 -2009 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1/2008 10/1/2008 Std Capacity 2 ELL ELL Prgm Program Program Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 Headcount 3 Clsrms at 25 -29 Cis Capacity Clsrms Capacity Capacity 2 Relocatables Relocatables at 29 ea. Enrollment Enrollment Cedar Heights Middle School CH 32 782 9 93 2 48 923 Mattson Middle. School MA 24 585 6 59 7 160 804 Meeker Middle Schoot MK 33 807 4 59 1 24 890 Meridian Middle School MJ 26 631 5 64 4 95 790 Mill Creek Middle School MC 30 729 5 51 2 48 828 Northwood Middle School NW 33 807 4 46 5 119 972 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3 - 12) Middle School Grade 7 - 8 Enrollment Middle School TOTAL O 2 6 0 O 0 0 3 6 174 O 4 116 O 0 0 145 0 745.09 747 667.00 670 652.11 655 714.20 716 762.00 762 662.60 663 56.20 57 178 4,341 33 372 21 494 5,207 9 12 435 4,259.20 4,270 APPENDIX B # of Standard SE / I Special Ed Spec Special 1 2008 -2009 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1 /2008 10/1 /2008 Std Capacity ELL ELL Prgm Program Program Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 Headcount 3 Clsrms at 25-31 Cls Capacity Clsrms Capacity Capacity 2 Relocatables Relocatables at 31 ea. Enrollment Enrollment CO Kent - Meridlan Senior High KM 53 1,376 8 110 12 286 1,772 Kentlake Senior High KL 58 1,508 12 145 14 333 1,986 Kentridge Senior High KR 69 1,766 11 123 16 381 2,270 Kentwood Senior High KW 65 1,692 5 51 17 394 2,137 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3 - 12) Senior High Grade 9 -12 Enrollment See Elem Kent Phoenix Academy PH 350 Regional Justice Center RJ N/A N/A 1 0 5 0 4 124 5 155 155 4 5 155 1,778.20 1,813 1,798.20 1,833 2,192.60 2,237 2,097.37 2,171 154.57 157 279.60 290 33.00 33 Senior High TOTAL 245 6,342 36 429 59 1,394 8,515 5 19 589 8,333.54 8,534 APPENDIX C DISTRICT TOTAL 953 23,423 191 1,489 80 1,888 1 27,150 75 53 1,552 Excludes Running Start & Early Childhood Ed students 25,827.82 26,831 ' Special Pr og ram capacity includes classrooms requiring specialized use such as Special Education, Career & Technical Education Programs, Computer Labs, etc. 2 Secondary school capacity is adjusted for 85% utilization rate and 1 -728 class slze reduction in 7th & 10th grade English classes. 9th grade moved to HS in 2004. 3 Enrollment Is reported on FTE & Headcount basis. P223 Headcount excludes ECE & College -only Running Start students. Full headcount including ECE & RS = 27,579. Some totals may be slightly different due to rounding. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Total of Appendices A B & C April 2009 Page 34 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 USE of RELOCATABLES lea911sxrs.'+timavi eeNItICr•reuagetisM tNCaax2,',3EX oraCadSrlEarzst 41026 .'r.T4l3R_ F— ufaar itZ WaXStrsursaraw+nMIC: 7CPAas VASMIZT rLrru:Otis^OMEW.�.GQa.2xsah.,v meaahafirsl School Year 2008 - 2009 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Relocatable Use 1 No. of Student No. of Student No. of Student No. of Student No. of Student No. of Student No. of Student Relocatables Capacity Relocatables Capacity Relocatabies Capacity Relocatables Capacity Relocatables Capacity Relocatabies Capacity Relocatables Capacity mes0 mr.:�Sau :t: NM'TL'lars rzt.,,:4.4.1: sur4 Jec.,?.'^....w4 1$3..� s:e_ne+4r ._f n.anr,e:-tx. n'T.. 977 .— xn:J.^.':� .tier..1/4w■nuo.o 73.M3- r4..LFySt:eu -raHI i te..g. ..t 1.. ..samr.. •s/ /04c.en e.".3C_^'.4 -• 0. 1ttcw�CF.wrove,. - =3,- -- 7-.KaW:w Relocatables for classroom use 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 Relocatables for program use (ie. Computer labs, music, etc.) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Elementary Capacity Required @ 24 2 0 0 5 120 13 312 17 408 4 96 20 480 35 840 Middle School Capacity Required @ 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Capacity Required @ 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Relocatables Utilized 4 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 Classroom Relocatable /Capacity Required 0 0 5 120 13 312 17 408 4 96 20 480 35 840 Plan for Allocation of Required Classroom Relocatable Facilities included in Finance Plan: Elementary 112 0 5 13 17 4 20. 35 Middle School 3 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Senior High 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 5 13 17 4 20 35 Use of additional relocatables for classrooms or special programs is based on need and fluctuations of enrollment at each school. 2 Full Day Kindergarten will Increase the need for relocatables at the elementary level until permanent capacity can be provided. 3 Grade Level Reconfiguration - In 2004. 9th grade students moved to high schools creating sufficient permanent capacity at middle schools. 4 Although relocatables are utilized for a wide variety of purposes, new construction and boundary adjustments are timed to minimize the requirement for relocatables. Kent Schc Ict Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan APPET D April 2009 35 KENT SCHOOL v1STRICT No. 415 Student Generation Factor Survey Edulog a Single Family Developments Elementary Area Total Units Students Students Total Elem Student Generation Factor HS Total Elem MS HS Total Elem MS HS 78 Crofton Hills / Savana / The Reserve / Stonefield - Covington CO 351 .360 169 62 129 1.026 0.481 0.177 0.368 187 Eastland Meadows - Kent SC 13 21 9 2 10 1.615 0.692 0.154 0.769 399 Fem Crest East - Kent SR 171 132 86 20 26 0.772 0.503 0.117 0.152 400 Fem Crest West - Kent SR 130 79 47 10 22 0.608 0.362 0.077 0.169 228 Kentlake Highlands - Kent SW 97 87 47 13 27 0.897 0.485 0.134 0.278 389 Parke Meadows & North Parke Meadows - Covington CW 106 117 70 15 32 1.104 0.660 0.142 0.302 410 Rhododendron Estates - Kent ML 16 37 24 6 7 2.313 1.500 0.375 0.436 419 Southridge - Eagle Crest - Park View - Kent HE 219 164 99 24 41 0.749 0.452 0.110 0.187 420 Tamarack Ridge - Covington CW 134 78 40 12 26 0.582 0.299 0.090 0.194 179 The Parks - Renton RW 172 153 71 21 61 0.890 0.413 0.122 0.355 337 The Parks at Riverview - Kent NO 148 38 20 9 9 0.257 0.135 0.061 0.061 416 Trovitsky Park - Renton RW 167 124 81 11 32 0.743 0.485 0.066 0.192 417 Wood Creek - Covington CW 154 128 73 16 39 0.831 0.474 0.104 0.253 Total 1,878 1,518 836 221 461 0.808 • 0.445 0.118 0.245 Edulog # Multi- Family Developments Elementary Area Total Units Students Student Generation Factor Total Elem MS HS Total Elem MS HS 418 Adagio Apartments - Covington CO 200 61 28 12 21 0.305 0.140 0.060 0.105 412 Alderbrook Apartments - Kent EH 207 118 78 18 22 0.570 0.377 0.087 0.106 158 Brentwood Townhomes - Kent SH 81 51 25 14 12 0.630 0.309 0.173 0.148 146 Fairwood Pond Apartments - Renton FW 194 33 21 -7 5 0.170 0,108 0.036 0.026 414 Park Place Apartments - Kent SH 51 88 62 9 17 1.725 1.216 0.176 0.333 102 Rock Creek Landing - Kent PL 211 77 41 14 22 0.365 0.194 0.066 0.104 413 Silver Springs Apartments - Kent PL 251 163 108 21 34 0.649 0.430 0.084 0.135 192 Sunrise at Benson Condos - Kent GR 88 27 17 1 9 0.307 0.193 0.011 0.102 Total 1,283 618 380 96 142 0.482 0.296 0.075 0.111 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX E April 2009 Page 36 POLICY /TEXT AMENDMENT #3 Dieringer School District Updated 2009 -2014 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Dieringer School District Updated 2009 -2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors April 2008) Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2010 -2015 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320 -178th Avenue East Sumner, Washington 98390 (253) 862 -2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jim Barfoot Pete George Corey Pawlak James Premo John McKenna Dr. Judy Neumeier- Martinson, Superintendent • Dieringer • Educating every child for • Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow An Overview Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School, provide K through 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Aubum, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northern two - thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment is approximately 1,265 students in grades kindergarten through eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Lake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. An addition was just completed this year: Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998, North Tapps Middle School houses students in grades sixth - eighth. An Addition to the Middle School will be completed in late 2009, that will add an auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom and four science classrooms. The district supports an additional 522 high school students who may select to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend Auburn Riverside and Sumner High Schools. The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed of students who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. Parents are concerned with student success and provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School District. The PTA and many volunteers contribute countless hours and resources to our schools and students. The community supports the schools through the passage of funding issues to support bus acquisition, student access to current technology, and the construction of school facilities. DIERJNGER SCHOOL DISTRICT D. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2009 Current Facilities Inventory of Public Schools NAME CAPACITY LOCATION Lake Tapps Elementary 396 1320 -178th Ave E., Lake Tapps Dieringer Heights Elementary 547 21727- 34th St. E., Lake Tapps North Tapps Middle School 405 20029- 12th St., E., LaIce Tapps High School 0 TOTAL 1,348 DIERINGER DISTRICT SCHOOL NO, :343 .e Dieringer School District is located in an area that cone to experience growth. _ nis growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicat,.,:. enrollment trend data, proposed housing development, the increase in the assessed valuation of the real property, and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District continues to experience slow, steady growth in student enrollment. This has mirrored the Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed construction within the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and beyond. This growth trend will be slowed by the current economic conditions, but will pick up in 2010 and beyond. There are 672 single . family residents slated for construction within the next four years. Multi - family projects, will contribute an additional 371 residential units during that time. These projects, together with individual lots and general in- migration, are anticipated to generate an additional 526 students in kindergarten through eighth grade. Information from Pierce County Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 additional housing lots in the western portion of the district. This creates a potential for 576 additional students, kindergarten through eighth grade, that are not included in the above numbers. To partially address this growth, the District passed a 2006 bond issue to construct an additional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary. That addition is completed and will be fully occupied in 2009. The bond issue also provided for the addition of an auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North Tapps Middle School; these projects have been delayed due to an extended permitting process and are anticipated to be completed by December, 2009. Future anticipated growth will create the need to acquire an additional school site and construct an additional school to house the growing student enrollment. 1 V Lc, LL LEW, .11.1.1. V11111L+11 L 111E+1<+CLON April, 2009 Proposed Housing Units for Approved Developments: Single Family- 672 x .48 generation factor = 323 students K -8 grade Multi - family — 371 x .1149 generation factor = 43 students K -8 grade (Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Generation Factor) Proposed Housing Units from Individual Lots and In- migration: 160 students K -8 grade Enrollment Impact: 526 students K -8 Estimated 105 students a year over the period 2010 -2015 Potential five year enrollment increase = 41.51% (based on 1,267 enrollment 4-09) Increase per grade level = 58 students Approximately 175 students per school TI.. £ ML. TI%.MI.L6.1 •■V V JJJI.UI - Notice of application 1/24/01 - 28 Single Family Lots - 1600 -2000 block of 16th St. @ the 17500 -17800 block of Sumner -Tapps Hwy. - 3 lots sold; 3 houses completed /1 under construction #2 Rainier Plateau (10) - Notice of application 10/13/00 -10 Single Family Lots - End of34`hSt. - Site work underway; home construction 2008 (no change) #3 Grandview Ridge II and III (9) - Off Sumner -Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr. - Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13/99 - 50 Single Family Lots; completed - III (9 lots) no date (no change) #4 Northlake (154) -north of Lake Tapps Elementary - Preliminary Plat 7/23/02 -197 Single Family Lots -43 homes completed/under construction; new starts will continue #5 The Estates (139) - Notice of application 8/27/04 -234 single family Lots -South of road terminus from Lakeland Hills Hwy. -56 homes completed; Division II 39 homes completed/7 foundations #6 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (11) - Notice of application 9/13/04 -11 large lots - across from Snag Island -site work complete (no change) #'7 Country Creek Estates (8) -9 Single Family Lots -off 15`h near Edwards Road - one (1) house nearing completion 1#8 Forest Canyon Estates (121) -121 Single Family Lots —off Forest Canyon Rd. - completion 2010 (no change) #11 Carter Estates (16) -16 Single Family Lots — Lake Tapps Parkway and 179th -16 homes (no construction) #12 Charlotte Avenue (6) -6 Single Family Lots — Lalce Tapps Parkway and 176th -6 homes (no construction) #13 8th Street Development (324) -324 Multi- family units; north of Sumner Meadows - Sumner City limits -324 units; site work; possible construction 2009 #14 Lakeland 8 (68) -68 Single Family lots- north of Lake Tapps Parkway -68 homes; site work (construction not scheduled) #15 Auburn Annexation (100) -100 Single Family Lots Total Single Family Units to be built - 672 Total Multiple Family Units to be built - 371 2/09 ie Dieringer School District houses children in elemental hools serving students iundergarten through fifth grade and a middle school that ,.,_,uses grades six through eighth. High school- students, grades nine through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Auburn School-District. Dieringer School District follows a traditional school calendar beginning in early September and completing in mid June. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49 and 8:45 a.m. and end between "2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Dieringer School District standard of service is based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Due to the passage of Initiative 728 and in keeping with the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom kindergarten through third grade is 22, fourth through fifth grade 25 and. sixth through eighth grade 27. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes. In the District, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not counted as capacity classrooms. At the elementary level, students are provided music instruction, physical education and art instruction in separate, _non-capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non-capacity spaces. Special education' and remedial programs are provided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. DrERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2009 Dieringer School District Service Standards Public School Facilities (Square Feet Per Student) Elementary School 120 Middle School 189 Junior High NA High School NA Dieringer School District Individual Capacity Projects (2010 -2015) NAME CAPACITY Elementary School No. 3 400 North Tapps Middle School Science Labs, Auxiliary Gym, Health and Fitness Classroom Addition 162 High School NA DIERINUER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, April 2009 CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds (x $1,000) Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Bond Proceeds, Reserve New Revenue: Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments $ 1,960 $1 9,775 TOTAL SOURCES $21,735 Uses of Funds Elementary School No. 3 ($19,775) North Tapps Middle School ($1,560) Science Labs, Auxiliary Gym, Health And Fitness Classroom Non - Capacity Projects: Technology Upgrades & Road Improvements J102 TOTAL USES ($21,735) BALANCE 0 Permanent Capacity Projects DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 FINANCE PLAN April, 2009 Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source of Funds Estimated Estimated Estimated Bond & State Impact Cost Bond Amt. State Match Interest _ Match Fees Elementary School No. 3 19,775,000 19,775,000 0 N T Middle School Additions 1,560,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 560,000 Total Capacity Projects 21,335,000 19,775,000 0 1,000,000 0 560,000 Non - Capacity Projects Technology Improvements 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 Road Improvements 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 Total Non - Capacity Projects 400,000 0 0 400,000 0 0 TOTAL PROJECTS 21,735,000 19,775,000 0 1,400,000 0 560,000 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS MASTER - SCHEDULE April, 2009' Name Current 6 - Year Total Capacity Capacity Capacity 2009 -2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Lake Tapps Elementary 396 396 (LTES Replacement) Dieringer Heights Elem. 431 DHES Classroom Addit. 116 547 Elementary School No. 3 431 116 547 400 400 North Tapps MS 405 405 NTMS Additions (ScienceIRms) 108 108 (Auxilliary Gym) 54 54 TOTALS 1348 562 1910 X X X Time Period DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2009 Capital Facilities Requirements to 2015 Student Student Net Reserve Total Cost Population Capacity Or (Deficiency) (Cost/Student X Net Deficiency) 2009 Actual 1265 1348 83 2010 -2015 Growth 526 562 36 Dieringer School District Cost Per Student (2009 Dollars) Elementary Middle Junior High High Schools Schools Schools Schools $28,115 $39,848 NA NA .. .. . . Student Stud! Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elemento 12.00 $25a000 400 0.322 0.069 $2,412 $515 TO7AL $Z412 $515 School Construction Cost: . Rid ' aCIlity ' Student Student ., . Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementa No. 3 $19,775,000 400 0.322 0.069 $15,919 $3,411 TOTAL $23,154 $5,522 ((Facility Cost/Facill Ca •acl )xStudent Generation Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Feet Student Student Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq.F Cost Size SFR MFR Elementa • 0.322 0.069 • TOTAL 50 $0 State Matching Credit: Boeckh Index X SPI S•uare Footage X District Match % X Student Factor Student Student Boeckh SPI District Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match % SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementa TOTAL $0 50 Tax Payment Credit: SFR MFR Averate Assessed Value (est.) 2008 • $587,405 5364,872 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4/09 .' 4.65% ' 4.65% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $4,613,880 52,865,954 Property Tax Levy Rate 2009 • 51.9630 , 51.9630 Present Value of Revenue Stream 59,057 55,626 Site Ac•uistIon Costs 52412.00 5515.00 Permanent FacIll Cost $23,154.43 $5,521.56 State Match Credit 50.00 50.00 Tax Payment Credit (59,057,05) (55,625.87) POLICY /TEXT AMENDMENT #4 Federal Way School District Updated 2010 Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Federal Way School District Updated 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Adopted by the Federal Way School District Board of Directors May 2009) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Suzanne Smith, President Tony Moore, Vice President Ed Barney, Director Amye Bronson - Doherty, Director Angela Griffin, Director SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy Prepared by: Sally D. McLean Tanya Nascimento FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 -3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non - Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 11 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle School Boundaries 13 Map - High School Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16 -17 Portable Locations 18 -19 Student Forecast 20 -22 Capacity Summaries 23 -27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28 -30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2009 31 -33 PLAN 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95 -249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2009. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. The District has prepared a multi -phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond on May 15, 2007. The bond, passed at 63.93 %, will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school, Lakota. Plans to replace Federal Way High School and Decatur High School and to increase capacity by approximately 400 students at each school are planned in later phases. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout. Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $122 million. Estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election. None of the cost to replace Federal Way or Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The non - instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. In September 2007 Woodmont Elementary School began a K -8 program by adding a 6th grade and progressively adding a grade level each year. In March 2008, the Board approved a second K -8 program at Nautilus Elementary School. Nautilus began the 2008/09 school year with K -6`h grade. As the program grows there will be more data available about the unique facility needs for this grade configuration. The District opened a new school in September 2008. The Technology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy will provide a small school setting for 6th through 12th grade students. This academy is funded through a unique public /private partnership between the Technology Access Foundation and Federal Way Public Schools. The focus of the school is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). The TAF Academy opened in September of 2008 with students in grades 6, 7 and 9. In the 2009/10 school year TAF Academy added 8th and 10`h grade. Grades 11 and 12 will be added in successive years with a target population of about 350. The District continues to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming year. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide Brigadoon Camelot Enterprise Green Gables Lake Dolloff Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain Meredith Hill Mirror Lake Nautilus (K -8) Olympic View Panther Lake Rainier View Sherwood Forest Silver Lake Star Lake Sunnycrest Twin Lakes Valhalla Wildwood Woodmont (K -8) MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy (6 -10) Illahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Saghalie Sequoyah Totem TAF Academy (6 -12) HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur Federal Way Thomas Jefferson Todd Beamer Career Academy at Truman ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School Internet Academy 1635 SW 304th Street 3601 SW 336th Street 4041 S 298th Street 35101 5th Avenue SW 32607 47th Avenue SW 4200 S 308th Street 303 SW 308th Street 35827 32nd Avenue S 2450 S Star Lake Road 5830 S 300th Street 625 S 314th Street 1000 S 289th Street 2626 SW 327th Street 34424 1st Avenue S 3015 S 368th Street 34600 12th Avenue SW 1310 SW 325th Place 4014 S 270th Street 24629 42nd Avenue S 4400 SW 320th Street 27847 42nd Avenue S 2405 S 300th Street 26454 16th Avenue S. 34620 9th Avenue S 36001 1st Avenue S 4400 S 308th Street 1415 SW 314th Street 1101 S Dash Point Road 33914 19th Avenue SW 3450 S 360th ST 26630 40th Ave S 26630 40th Ave S 2800 SW 320th Street 30611 16th Avenue S 4248 S 288th Street 35999 16th Ave S 31455 28th Ave S 36001 1St Ave S 31455 28th Ave S 5 Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Kent Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Des Moines Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Kent Kent Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way 98023 98023 98001 98023 98023 98001 98023 98001 98003 98001 98003 98003 98023 98003 98003 98023 98023 98032 98032 98023 98001 98003 98198 98003 98003 98001 98023 98003 98023 98001 98032 98032 98023 98003 98001 98003 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON - INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Leased Space Community Resource Center Available Office Space Undeveloped Property 31405 18th Avenue S 1066 S 320th Street 1344 S 308th Street 1300 S 308th Street 1813 S Commons 32020 lst Ave S Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way 98003 98003 98003 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Site # 1 Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335`h Streets - 10.04 Acres N of SW 320th and east of 45`h PL SW — 23.45 Acres 1 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 l s` Way S and S 342 "d St — Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S — .36 Acres 81 S 332nd St and 9th Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Im.act Fees. Elementary Schools: Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Replace Existing Buildings Increase capacity at Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla b a total of 200 seats Voter approved bonds. Lakota Middle School Rep lace Existin Buildin: Voter a s .roved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Ca. aci Future bond authorization Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Ca . acit Future bond authorization. The District is also planning the replacement of some non - instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres (Site #81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non - instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the multi -phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 7 I LOCATION I ANTICIPATED SOURCE I OF FUNDS FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES i NEW FACILITY No current plans for additional facilities. 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Secured Funding Projected Revenue Actual and Planned Expenditures Six Year Finance Plan Sources Imsact Fees (1) $69,875 Land Sale Funds 2) $143,642 Bond Funds (3) $81,545,134 State Match (4) $4,598,259) TOTAL $77,160,392 Sources State Match 5) $20,000,000 Bond or Le Funds 6) $67,000,000 Land Fund Sales 7) $10,000,000 Im.act Fees (8) $1,800,000 TOTAL $98,800,000 otal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $175,960,392 NEW SCHOOLS Current and Budget 2010 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Valhalla Elementary Prior Years 2009/10 2010/11 2011 2011/12 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Total Cost 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2010 -2015 Panther Lake Elementary Lakeland Elementary $18,500,000 $17,500,000 Sunnycrest Elementary Lakota Middle School $7,570,000 $9,930,000 $7,570,000 $9,930,000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES $15,361,250 $15,038,750 $3,600,000 SO $0 $9,930,000 $9,930,000 $18,638,750 $18,500,000 $17,500,000 $17,500,000 $17,500,000 $34,000,000 Portables (9) TOTAL $200,000 $66,501,250 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $35,098,750 $3,800,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 NOTES: I. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/08. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. This is year end balance on 12/31/08. 3. This is the 12/31/08 balance of bond funds. This figure includes interest earnings. 4. In anticipation of State Match Funds for Valhalla, Panther Lake, Lakeland, and Sunncrest Elementaries and Lakota Middle School, work on specific building upgrades is occurring. This is a year end balance on 12/31/08. 5. This is anticipated State Match for projects attached to future bond issues. This is based on July 1, 2006 State Match indices. State Match funds are being used for high priority repairs, upgrades and system improvements to existing buildings. These improvements include HVAC, and other structural improvements are not related to capacity increase. 6. These are anticipated bond funds. Voters have approved a bond for $149m, $45m of this bond is for non school construction. As of 12/31/08, $82m has been sold. 7. Projected sale of surplus properties. 8. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years. This figure assumes $25,000 per month for the next six years. This figure has been adjusted to reflect the current economy. 9. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. $800,000 $39,298,750 $800,000 $105,800,000 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K -5), two schools with a K -8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6 -8), four high schools (grades 9 -12) and three small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6 -10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area. The Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9 -12. The Internet Academy serves grades K -12. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School District are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ❑ Elementary Schools 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables 6 Lake Dolloff 7 Lake Grove 8 Lakeland 9 Mark Twain 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirror Lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther Lake 15 Rainier View 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver Lake 18 Star Lake 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont Middle Schools 36 Federal Way Public Academy 30 Illahee 31 Kilo 32 Lakota 33 Sacajawea 34 Saghalie 37 Sequoyah 35 Totem High Schools 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 421 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beamer 49 Career Academy at Truman Administrative Building Undeveloped Property ti l I III N�al�IIIN�I•�1m1 uu ul III= 1111 au" 11 N? �N 1 asi 7. pm. mg (LI _ II �,T � NQ�IIHII id walsi IlNlnl - 1 111 ' " s.IIINI Nlll, uuNIfl111N IIII M AN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ❑ Elementary Schools 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables 6 Lake Dolloff 7 Lake Grove 8 Lakeland 9 Mark Twain 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirror Lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther Lake 15 Rainier View 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver Lake 18 Star Lake 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont Middle Schools 36 Federal Way Public Academy 30 Illahee 31 Kilo 32 Lakota 33 Sacajawea 34 Saghalie 37 Sequoyah 35 Totem High Schools 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 421 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beamer 49 Career Academy at Truman n Administrative Building MOT Site Undeveloped Property N WPM I■ �1N11 ■.RIKIQII r , Im mo aim IUlfh+IIIIr I MINILi IMR III FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES El Elementary Schools 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables 6 Lake Dolloff 7 Lake Grove 8 Lakeland 9 Mark Twain 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirror Lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther Lake 15 Rainier View 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver Lake 18 Star Lake ' 9 Sunnycrest 10 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont iffi Middle Schools 36 Federal Way Public Academy 30 Illahee 31 Kilo 32 Lakota 1 45, 1 S- 33 Sacajawea —" _Al ' 4k, 34 Saghalie I M g 1:1111 �I ,u 37 Sequoyah uu tiri :,'�;iull II" 35 Totem � ;° III ti if ® High Schools 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 421 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beamer 49 Career Academy at Truman 0 Administrative Building MOT Site Undeveloped Property J� Naga 1.7.1 W l � r — rr MIN DAL 1 1r IFS 1r 2 ■ r�V .• 1111 lid1•! ■IMM E 4 r tT FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast — 2010 through 2016 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi - Family Units 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. In grades 3 -5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. A recent Study & Survey was the basis for changes to the OSPI building report. The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 52 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2009/10 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount Adelaide 372 Brigadoon 327 Camelot 269 Ente rise 458 Green Gables 437 Lake Dolloff 433 Lake Grove 323 Lakeland 392 Mark Twain 327 Meredith Hill 453 Mirror Lake 325 1 auti us 211 Olympic View 328 Panther Lake 383 Rainier View 432 Sherwood Forest 423 Silver Lake 390 Star Lake 361 Sunnycrest 369 Twin Lakes 297 Valhalla 449 Wildwood 317 Woodmont 350 2009 TOTAL 8,571 Elementary Average 1 373 Notes: MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Illahee 855 864 Kilo 827 835 Lakota 766 774 Sacajawea 700 707 Saghalie 829 837 Se•uoyah 589 595 Totem 714 721 Federal Way Public Academy 209 211 Technology Access Foundation Academy ** 2009 TOTAL 5,489 5,544 *Middle School Average 754 1 762 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Decatur 1239 1,37 Federal Way 1482 1,51. Thomas Jefferson 1339 1,432 Todd Beamer 1134 1,213 Career Academy at Truman 130 139 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117 Technology Access Foundation Academy ** 2009 TOTAL 5,433 5,811 *High School Average 1 1,299 1 1,389 * Federal Way Public Academy and Career Academy at Truman High School are non - boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. ** Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on the Totem Middle School site. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS INSTRUCTIONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 2 1 Brigadoon 7 1 Camelot 1 Ente T rise 2 1 Green Gables 4 1 Lake Dolloff 1 1 Lake Grove 1 1 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 1 Meredith Hill 3 4 Mirror Lake 4 Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake Rainier View 1 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 2 2 Star Lake 3 1 Sunnycrest 2 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla Wildwood 4 1 Woodmont 3 TOTAL 43 11 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS 19 PORTABLES LOCATED AT HIGH SCHOOLS INSTRUCTIONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 9 3 Kilo 7 1 Lakota 4 Sacajawea 4 1 Saghalie 4 Sequoyah 1 2 Totem Merit 2 TAF Academy 6 1 28 4 19 PORTABLES LOCATED AT HIGH SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT INSTRUCTIONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL Decatur 9 6 Federal Way 2 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Todd Beamer 8 1 TAF Academy 8 TOTAL 37 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT 1 TDC 5 TOTAL 6 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 Total 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school - building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five -year projection of school enrollment. In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long -range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5 -19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school -age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long -range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long -range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long -range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long -range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. Current economic conditions do appear to be affecting enrollment. This is reflected in the District's projections. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE =.99 Headcount; High School FTE = .935Headcount) Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High October Headcount 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 B2009 -10 P2010 -11 P2011 -12 P2012 -13 P2013 -14 P2014 -15 P2015 -16 * New Configuration 9,127 9,164 9,105 9,022 8,912 8,865 8,793 8,838 8,894 8,988 9,091 9,175 9,253 Elementary K -5 5,524 5,473 5,309 5,261 5,167 5,155 5,076 5,077 5,042 4,995 4,969 5,012 5,086 Middle School 6 -8 6,408 6,515 6,770 6,754 6,637 6,456 6,325 6,167 6,129 6,109 6,111 6,066 6,022 High School 9 -12 22,000 21,000 - 20,000 - 19,000 - 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast Total K -12 Percent FTE Change 21,059 21,152 0.4% 21,184 0.2% 21,037 -0.7% 20,716 -1.5% 20,476 -1.2% 20,194 -1.4% 20,082 -0.6% 20,065 -0.1% 20,092 0.1% 20,171 0.4% 20,253 0.4% 20,361 0.5% 0FTE x00 �0� �00 0 s , X00' T3.0 O, 00 b0 School Year °O'O °O, •°O i J 7 'cD �UD -0 -0 a0v �o .), ,s 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY 20,194 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 School Year 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAP ACITY 19,493 19,926 19,493 19,926 19,493 19,926 19,593 20,026 19,593 19,593 19,593 20,026 _ FTE CAPACITY 20,026 20,026 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity, Lakeland, Panther Lake . Sunnycrest and Valhalla . 100 100 - Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,593 19,493 19,593 19,593 19,593 19,593 19,593 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 20,026 19,926 20,026 20,026 20,026 20,026 20,026 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,194 20,082 20,065 20,092 20,171 20,253 20,361 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) • (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 19,879 19,767 19,750 19,777 19,856 19,938 20,046 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY 147 159 276 249 170 88 (20) • RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,700 2,700 2;700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 Deduct Portable Capacity (125) , _ Add New Portable Capacity 125 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2,847 2,859 2,976 2,949 2,870 2,788 2,680 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY 8,793 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 School Year 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 1. Increase Capacity Lakeland and Sunn crest 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 8,793 8,838 8,894 8,988 9,091 9,175 9,253 2. Internet Academy (AAFTE) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 8,757 8,802 8,858 8,952 9,055 9,139 9,217 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (186) (231) (187) (281) (384) (468) (546) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 889 844 888 794 691 607 529 NOTES: 1. Increase Capacity at Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY 5,076 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 School Year 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 5,489 5,544 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,076 5,077 5,042 4,995 4,969 5,012 5,086 1. Internet Academy (AAFTE) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,002 5,003 4,968 4,921 4,895 4,938 5,012 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 542 541 576 623 649 606 532 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity Add /Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity Sequoyah Subtract portable capacity from Totem Adjusted Portable Capacity 825 25 (125) 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) P ROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,267 1,266 1,301 1,348 1,374 1,331 - 1,257 NOTES: I. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY 6,325 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 School Year 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 5,433 5,811 Add or subtract changes in capacity 900 900 900 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,325 6,167 6,129 6,109 6,111 6,066 6,022 1. Internet Academy (AAFTE) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,120 5,962 5,924 5,904 5,906 5,861 5,817 SURPLUS OR ( UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (309) (151) (113) (93) (95) (50) (6) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 800 900 900 900 900 900 900 Add /Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at TAF Academy 100 Adjusted Portable Capacity 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 3. CAPACITY 591 749 787 807 805 _ 850 894 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi- Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi - family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single - family units and multi - family units. The factors used in the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single - family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi - family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. Plan Year 2010 Plan Year 2009 Single Family Units Multi - Family Units $3,832 $4,017 $2,114 $1,733 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generation Student Generation rate is based on totals. Multi - Family Student Generation Number of Single Family Dwellings Number of Multi - Family Dwellings Number of Elementary Students Number of Middle School Students Number of High School Students Elementary Student Factor Middle School Student Factor High School Student Factor Total Student Factor DEVELOPMENT 09 Lakota Crest 41 0 3 7 2 0.0732 0.1707 0.0488 0.2927 09 Tuscan 18 0 9 2 1 0.5000 0.1111 0.0556 0.6667 08 Northlake Ride IV 90 0 30 9 15 0.3333 0.1000 0.1667 0.6000 08 Collin. tree Park 42 0 19 5 2 0.4524 0.1190 0.0476 0.6190 07 Colella Estates 81 0 31 13 22 0.3827 0.1605 0.2716 0.8148 07 Woodbrook 169 0 36 25 39 0.2130 0.1479 0.2308 0.5917 06 Devonshire 29 0 15 6 17 0.5172 0.2069 0.5862 1.3103 06 Orchid Lane 50 0 25 11 13 0.5000 0.2200 0.2600 0.9800 05 Danville Station 80 0 36 18 22 0.4500 0.2250 0.2750 0.9500 (05) Northlake Ridge I, II AND III 241 0 75 43 54 0.3112 0.1784 0.2241 0.7137 Total 841 0 279 139 187 Student Generation* 0.3317 0.1653 0.2224 0.7194 Student Generation rate is based on totals. Multi - Family Student Generation Elementa Middle School High School Total Auburn 0.079 0.034 0.042 0.155 Issa• uah 0.102 0.049 0.052 0.203 Kent 0.296 0.075 0.111 0.482 Lake Washington 0.132 0.049 0.031 0.212 Average 0.152 0.052 0.059 0.263 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 'hoot Site Acquisition Cost: Facility Acreage Elementary Middle School High School Cost / Acre IMPACT FEE Facility Capacity Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac./ Total S. Ft Elementary Middle School High School Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR 95.62% $9,100,000 200 0.3317 0.1520 $0 $0 4.38% $193,607 25 0.1653 0.0520 $0 $0 $168.79 0.2224 0.0590 $0 $0 TOTAL SO $0 School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac./ Total S. Ft Elementary Middle School High School Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR 95.62% $9,100,000 200 0.3317 0.1 520 $14,431 $6,613 4.38% $193,607 25 0.1653 0.0520 SO SO $168.79 0.2224 0.0590 $0 $0 TOTAL $14,431 - $6,613 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. Total S• Ft Elementary Middle School High School Facility Cost Facility Size Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR State Matching Credit Calculation: Area Cost Allowance /S. Ft Elementary Middle School High School Sq. Ft. Student State Match Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR $168.79 90 61.09% 0.3317 0.1520 $3,078 $1,411 4.38% $193,607 25 0.1653 0.0520 $56 $18 $168.79 0.2224 0.0590 $0 $0 TOTAL $56 $18 State Matching Credit Calculation: Area Cost Allowance /S. Ft Elementary Middle School High School Sq. Ft. Student State Match Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR $168.79 90 61.09% 0.3317 0.1520 $3,078 $1,411 $168.79 $1.48 $1.48 0.1653 0.0520 . $0 $0 $168.79 0.2224 0.0590 $0 $0 Total $3,078 $1,411 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (March 2009) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2009) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub -Total 50% Local Share Single Family Multi- Family Residences Residences $ - $ $ 14,431 $ 6,613 $ 56 $ 18 $ (3,078) S. (1,411) $ (3,745) $ (992) SFR MFR $326,409 $86,497 4.96% 4.96% $2,525,346 $669,206 10 10 $1.48 $1.48 $3,745 $992 $ 7,664 $ 4,228 $ 3,832 $ 2,114 (Impact Fee $ 3,832 $ 2,1141 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2010 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2009 Plan and the 2010 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2010/2016 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2010 through 2016 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24 -27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 32 and 33. 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2009 TO 2010 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla is $70,000,000. The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building. The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505. Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13 %. Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000 = $9,100,000 The District will use the above formula created as a base from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of the four elementary schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. For instance, for each new all day Kindergarten program, the building capacity will effectively be reduced by 20 headcount and the Board authorized an increase in construction cost of $1m for Valhalla. These changes would increase the construction cost. The District is using the base formula established in the 2008 plan in the Impact Fee calculation. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2009 TO 2010 IMPACT FEE Item From /To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.81% to 95.62% Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.19% to 4.38% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $168,307 to $193,607 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2009 Area Cost Allowance $168.79 to $168.79 No change from the prior year. State Match 61.84% to 61.09% Change effective July 2008 Average Assessed Value SFR — Per Puget Sound Educational $297,242 to $326,409 Service District (ESD 121) MFR — $68,998 to $86,497 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to 4.96% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.49 to $1.48 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Elementary .3285 to .3317 Middle School .1631 to .1653 High School .2446 to .2224 Multi- Family Student Yield Elementary .1222 to .1520 Middle School .0621 to .0520 High School .0942 to .0590 33 Updated Housing Inventory Updated Housing Inventory