HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-16-2012 Public Works Committee Agenda Packet
Public Works Committee
July 16, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes*
B. Public Works Project No. CP1108* (Lee)
Approve Rejecting All Bids for Contract No. 11-14 for Project No. CP1108, 2011
Citywide Storm Pond Cleaning
C. Public Works Project No. CP1006* (Dunsdon)
Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 14 to Contract No. 11-05 in the Amount of
$7,271.04 and Accept Construction of Project No. CP1006, Lakeland Hills
Reservoir 6
III.RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4840* (Truong)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Mayor to Award and Execute an Agreement with the Lowest Responsible Bidder
for Construction of Public Works Contract Number 12-14 for Project EM0902,
Flood Control Barrier Removal
IV.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. May 2012 Financial Report* (Coleman)
B. Resolution No. 4837* (Faber)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Modification of a Contract Previously Authorized with the Passage of Resolution
No. 4406 with Virginia Paquette for Public Art at the Auburn Community Center at
the Les Gove Community Campus
C. Ordinance No. 6418* (Chamberlain)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending
Chapters 17.09 and 17.10 within Title 17 Land Adjustments and Divisions of the
Auburn City Code
D. Ordinance No. 6419* (Chamberlain)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending
Page 1 of 335
Chapters 18.29, 18.31, 18.52, and 18.60 within Title 18 Zoning of the Auburn City
Code
E. Ordinance No. 6420* (Chamberlain)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending
Section 19.02.050 of the Auburn City Code Related to School Impact Fees
F. Ordinance No. 6414* (Chamberlain)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending
Section 12.64A.030 of the Auburn City Code and Creating a Section 13.40.040 and
a New Chapter 17.28 of the Auburn City Code, Relating to the Installation of City-
Owned Improvements
G. Resolution No. 4835* (Snyder)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Negotiations and Execution of a Contract for Non-Profit Facilitator Services with the
National Development Council for the Auburn Community Center at the Les Gove
Community Campus
H. Resolution No. 4836* (Snyder/Heid/Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Mayor to Execute the Transfer and Exchange of Real Property Between and with
the Washington State Department of Transportation Regarding Phase II of the
Auburn Environmental Park
I. 2012 Arterial/Collector Crackseal Project (Wickstrom)
J. Auburn Way South & M Street SE Intersection Improvements* (Para)
K. 2013 - 2018 Transportation Improvement Program Annual Update* (Para)
L. Capital Project Status Report* (Gaub)
M. Activities Matrix* (Dowdy)
V.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes
Date:
July 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
July 2, 2012 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the July 2, 2012 Public Works
Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 335
Public Works Committee
July 2, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in
Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One
East Main Street, Auburn, Washington, 98002.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wagner, Vice-Chair Bill Peloza, and Member Osborne were
present. Also present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete Lewis,
Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, Assistant City Engineer Ingrid
Gaub, Utilities Engineer Dan Repp, Engineering Aide Amber Mund,
Traffic Engineer Pablo Para, Project Engineer Kim Truong, Street
Systems Engineer Seth Wickstrom, Water Utility Engineer Cynthia
Lamothe, Assistant Police Chief William Pierson, Emergency
Preparedness Manager Sarah Miller, Recreation Program/Marketing
Manager Julie Brewer, Solid Waste Recycling Coordinator Joan
Nelson, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, City Attorney Dan Heid,
Director of Human Resources/Risk Management Brenda Heineman,
citizen Scot Pondelick, and Public Works Secretary Jennifer Rigsby.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were two agenda modifications, Consent Agenda Item I, Public
Works Banner Pole Foundation Repair Project and Discussion Item E,
Auburn Municipal Court.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve the minutes of the June 18, 2012
Public Works Committee Meeting, as corrected.
Vice-Chair Peloza noted a Scribner’s error on the last page of the
minutes.
Page 1 of 9
CA.A Page 4 of 335
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
B. Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-15* (Brewer/Welsh)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve the amendment to Right-of-Way Use
Permit No. 12-15 for the Parks and Recreation Department
ArtRageous.
Chairman Wagner explained that the Committee had concerns
regarding children crossing Auburn Avenue at the Main Street
intersection to reach activities. Program/Marketing Manager Brewer
stated there will be additional signage and the children’s activities are
located a greater distance apart than they have it the past to help
prevent children from moving quickly from one activity to the next.
Chairman Wagner asked if there will be staff available to monitor the
crossing. Program/Marketing Manager Brewer stated that there are no
staff currently assigned to monitor the crossing, but there may be
volunteers available to assist.
Chairman Wagner asked if the activities can be separated even further
than they currently are to help prevent children from rushing across
the street. Program/Marketing Manager Brewer confirmed that would
be possible.
Program/Marketing Manager Brewer answered questions asked by
Member Osborne regarding the events on the east side of Auburn
Way North.
Chairman Wagner noted that since the goal is to have more City
events in the downtown area, staff needs to be aware of each event’s
demographic and take certain safety precautions, especially for
children’s events.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
C. Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-18 (Welsh)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-18 for
Emergency Management’s Disaster Fair.
Emergency Preparedness Manager Miller stated that her staff has
coordinated with the Farmers’ Market and the two events are cross
promoting and doing some activities together, in response to a
question asked by Chairman Wagner.
Page 2 of 9
CA.A Page 5 of 335
Member Osborne asked if the City Hall Plaza and extended plaza
areas can be used for the fair. Emergency Preparedness Manager
Miller answered that the plaza areas are being used but there will be a
fire truck and larger equipment at the fair and those cannot be parked
on the Plaza areas but will be in the street instead.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
D. Public Works Project No. CP1121 (Wickstrom)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council grant permission to
advertise for bids for Project No. CP1121, 2011/2012 City Sidewalk
Repair Project.
Street Systems Engineer Wickstrom explained that the south eastern
area, as per the project vicinity map, is an area that was almost
completed during the bi-annual project two years ago, so this year the
area has been included in the scope in order to complete it. Wickstrom
reported that he is aware of a lot of public complaints regarding the
condition of the sidewalks in that particular area.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked that the 1100 block of Harvey Road be given
priority. Street Systems Engineer Wickstrom stated that as part of the
contract, Harvey Road work is expected to be completed first. Mayor
Lewis stated that the work at each location on Harvey Road should be
completed as needed, recognizing the urgency of repairing the 1100
block section. The Committee agreed.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
E. Public Works Project No. CP1201 (Wickstrom)
recommend City Council award Contract No. 12-08 to SCI
Infrastructure LLC on their low bid of $1,200,811.00 plus Washington
State sales tax of $30,286.86 for a Total Contract Price of
$1,231,167.86 for Project No. CP1201, 2012 Local Street Pavement
Reconstruction.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if the work on J Street SE will be similar to
the work being completed on H Street SE. Street Systems Engineer
Wickstrom answered that the work will be very similar in terms of
infrastructure.
Street Systems Engineer Wickstrom responded to questions asked by
Vice-Chair Peloza regarding recycling concrete.
F. Public Works Project No. CP1206 (Wickstrom)
Page 3 of 9
CA.A Page 6 of 335
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council award Contract No.
12-10 to Puget Paving and Construction on their low bid of
$1,261,713.50 for Project No. CP1206, 2012 Pavement Patching,
Chipseal, and Overlay Project.
Street Systems Engineer Wickstrom stated that notices explaining the
double chipseal process will be distributed to property owners within
the affected project areas, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner.
Chairman Wagner asked about signage. Street Systems Engineer
Wickstrom stated the Save Our Streets signage for the local roads will
be in place as well as construction warning signs, in response to
questions asked by Chairman Wagner and Member Osborne. Mayor
Lewis asked that the contractor also put up Loose Gravel signs on the
chipseal streets.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
G. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG-C-415 (Repp/Lamothe)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council grant permission to
enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG-C-415 with HDR Engineering
Inc., for engineering services for Water Utility Meter and Billing System
Improvements, as amended.
Utilities Engineer Repp addressed the Committee and explained that
the radio read meter equipment the City is currently using is not
compatible with the more advanced equipment now used in the
industry. Repp stated rather that continuing to install the current radio
read meters; staff is recommending evaluating the City’s current
equipment and the industry’s new technologies to develop a range of
options for the City to consider.
Water Utility Engineer Lamothe stated that the consultant will be
examining system conversion implementation issues, such as how
much of the City’s inventory can be utilized and salvaged and how the
process would take place, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner regarding the scope of work.
Utilities Engineer Repp and Water Utility Engineer Lamothe reviewed
the scope of work with the Committee.
Chairman Wagner asked that the scope of work be more specific and
include the alternative of salvaging and using some of the City’s
current equipment.
Page 4 of 9
CA.A Page 7 of 335
Utilities Engineer Repp stated that the intent of the scope of work is to
evaluate alternatives and creating a decision process, and there is
more focus on AMI technology because of the complexity of the
system and the benefits it can provide, in response to a question
asked by Member Osborne.
Utilities Engineer Repp reviewed the different technologies being used
by neighboring jurisdictions, in response to a question asked by Vice-
Chair Peloza.
Utilities Engineer Repp stated that visiting and reaching out to other
jurisdictions that are working on or have complete similar projects is
part of the consultant’s scope of work, in response to a question asked
by Member Osborne.
Utilities Engineer Repp responded to a question asked by Vice-Chair
Peloza regarding the necessity to use a consultant to complete the
scope of work instead of working directly with neighboring
jurisdictions. Director Dowdy pointed out how every jurisdiction’s water
and communications systems vary so we need advice on how to work
with Auburn’s specific systems.
Water Utility Engineer Lamothe answered questions asked by Member
Osborne regarding the consultant budget.
Utilities Engineer Repp stated the consultant work and the upgrade is
included in the Capital Improvement Plan and rate study. Water
Engineer Lamothe state that there is $2 million budgeted for the
upgrade portion of the project, in response to a statement made by
Member Osborne.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
H. Public Works Project No. EM0902 (Truong)
Councilmember Peloza moved and seconded to recommend City
Council grant permission to advertise for bids for Project No. EM0902,
Temporary Flood Control Barriers Project.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 0-0.
I. Public Works Banner Pole Repair Project* (Gaub)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council approve initiation of
the Public Works Banner Pole Repair Project.
Page 5 of 9
CA.A Page 8 of 335
The Committee and staff discussed the repair options; (a) repairing the
banner pole foundation only and (b) repairing both the banner pole
foundation and the surrounding settled sidewalk area. Director Dowdy
spoke about the condition of the sidewalk and curbs along Main
Street.
Director Dowdy explained that once work has commenced, it may be
discovered that there has been additional settlement and the sidewalk
and/or street area may need to be repaired in addition to the banner
pole foundation. Director Dowdy pointed out that the estimated cost of
the project is not budgeted.
The Committee and staff discussed the possible causes of the
settlement. The Committee and staff reviewed the project vicinity
map. Director Dowdy stated that following excavation, if the settlement
area appears to be larger than the area highlighted on the map, staff’s
recommendation is to repair the banner pole foundation and return to
Committee to discussed options for repairing the remaining
surrounding area at a later date. The Committee agreed.
The Committee and staff discussed if the damages may be covered by
insurance.
Director Dowdy stated that the project is unbudgeted and the cost
exceeds the Mayor’s authority, so the initiation of the project needs to
be approved by Council, in response to a question asked by Chairman
Wagner.
It was decided that if repairs to the sidewalk are made, staff will try to
match the existing boardwalk color and design.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
III. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4830 (Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute an Interlocal
Agreement with King County for the Completion of the Emergency
Flood Protection Measures Project
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to that the Committee recommend City Council
adopt Resolution No. 4830.
Director Dowdy spoke about the cost sharing and funding for the cost
of removal of the flood barriers. Director Dowdy stated that King
County funds will be allocated as if they were grant funds. King County
Page 6 of 9
CA.A Page 9 of 335
is covering 75% of cost and the City will be funding 25% either in full
or by borrowing the funds from the City’s allocated Opportunity Fund
of the Flood Control District.
Director Dowdy, Mayor Lewis and the Committee discussed project
funding. The decision was made to use the Opportunity Fund unless
costs exceed the current estimates.
Director Dowdy answered questions asked by the Committee
regarding restoration of the levees to their original condition.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that staff took photographs of
private properties prior to installation of the levees to assist in the
restoration process and there are allowances for the restoration in the
project estimate and contract.
The Committee and staff reviewed the Hold Harmless portion of the
agreement. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated there are
approximately a dozen or so private residences back yards included in
the project. The remainder of the work is located within the King
County Levee system. Assistant City Engineer Gaub described the
location of the work included in the project scope, in response to a
question asked by Chairman Wagner regarding cost of property
restoration.
Vice-Chair Peloza noted a Scribner’s error which will be corrected.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Senior Utility Discount and Rebate (Coleman)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to Finance Director Coleman reviewed the
existing program with the Committee. Coleman stated the rebates
were considered during the utility rate study.
The Committee discussed the cost for the programs & by consensus
agreed to continue the program as is.
Solid Waste Recycling Coordinator Nelson addressed questions asked
by Member Osborne regarding the rebate amounts for solid waste
customers.
Mayor Lewis stated that when the program was initiated it was done
so with the knowledge that the City would be covering the cost share
of the Metro sewer fees.
Page 7 of 9
CA.A Page 10 of 335
Finance Director Coleman answered questions asked by Member
Osborne regarding discounts for customers who are high water
consumers.
The Committee stated their support for the program.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 0-0.
B. Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety Project (Para)
Traffic Engineer Para reported that a grant has been secured to pay
for the project and so the Transportation Improvement Plan must now
be modified to obligate the funds.
Traffic Engineer Para reviewed the scope of the project for the
intersection at Auburn Way South and Riverwalk Drive SE, in
response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner.
C. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub)
Item 30 – CP1121 – 2011 Local Street Pavement Preservation Phase
2: Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated there is a failed sewer line
being repaired on 2nd Street NE that was not identified as a problem
until after paving the roadway, in response to a question asked by
Member Osborne.
Item 8 – C201A – M Street Underpass: Chairman Wagner asked if the
sidewalk supervisors have a place to view the project site. Assistant
City Engineer Gaub answered that there will probably not be a good
location to see the work going on and to bring people into the
construction site would not be safe. BNSF also does not want people
within their right-of-way.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub reported that the next closure for 6th
and 4th Streets NE is scheduled to begin July 23, 2012 and will last 4
weeks, to lower the roadway intersections.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the traffic signals on the M
Street detour route are monitored, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner.
D. Activities Matrix (Dowdy)
Item B – Coal Creek Springs Field Trip: The field trip is scheduled for
July 24, 2012. Chairman Wagner reiterated that Environmental
Protection Manager Andersen should also be included.
E. Auburn Municipal Court* (Coleman/Heineman)
Page 8 of 9
CA.A Page 11 of 335
Finance Director Coleman stated she included a 2013 column for the
Auburn Municipal Court and the King County District Court to the
spreadsheet provided to the Committee as part of the agenda
modification.
The Committee, Mayor Lewis and staff discussed the inclusion of the
Judge’s suggestions for reduction of services, into the proposal. Mayor
Lewis pointed out that the Council can assign a budget for court
services but cannot control the allocation of funds for each service, in
response to a statement made by Chairman Wagner. Director of
Human Resources/Risk Management Heineman explained that the
Court also has the ability to go over budget and the City has the
obligation to pay for the overrun, under state law.
Mayor Lewis stated that the points he made at the last Municipal
Services Committee are all that can be provided to Council.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:54 p.m.
Approved this 16th day of July, 2012.
Page 9 of 9
CA.A Page 12 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1108
Date:
July 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Bid Tabulation Summary
Vicinity Maps
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend City Council reject all bids for Contract No. 11-14 for
Project No. CP1108, 2011 Citywide Storm Pond Cleaning.
Background Summary:
This project is part of the 2011/2012 Storm Drainage Repair and Replacement Program and will remove
vegetation and accumulated sediments/debris in the detention cells at the following Storm Drainage sites:
Lakeland Hills Way Detention Ponds
Lake Tapps Parkway Detentions Pond
Trillium Detention Ponds
21st Street SE Detention Pond, Mill Pond Bioswale
Hillcrest East Detention Pond,
Royal Detention Pond
Bids were opened on July 10, 2012, only one bid was received and was approximately 83% above the Engineers
Estimate. Therefore, City Staff does not feel this represents a competitive bid and recommends rejecting all bids
in the best interest of the City.
The total budget for this project is $360,000. If this contract were to be awarded, it would require a budget
adjustment of approximately $192,128.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Lee
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B Page 13 of 335
Project No: CP1108Project Title:
Project Manager: Robert Lee
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: _8/1/2011_ Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: _6/21/2012_ Contract Award
Award Date: ___________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
432 Fund - Storm Drainage**019,973360,0000379,973
Total 019,973360,0000379,973
Activity Prior Years20112012Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs019,97333,000052,973
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs008,80008,800
Construction Estimate 00240,0000240,000
Project Contingency (10%)0024,000024,000
Construction Engineering - City Costs0030,000030,000
Total 019,973335,8000355,773
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
2011 City Wide Storm Pond Cleaning
Date: July 10, 2012
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Prior Years20112012Future Years Total
*432 Funds Budgeted ( )0 (19,973)(360,000)0(379,973)
432 Funds Needed 019,973335,8000355,773
*432 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (0)(24,200)0(24,200)
432 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates money the City has available.
** This is a portion of the 2011 and 2012 annual budget for the Storm Repair & Replacement Program.
432 Storm Drainage Budget Status
H:\PROJ\CP1108-2011 Citywide Storm Pond Cleaning\Budget\Pond R&R Budget Status.xls
1 of 1
Print Date: 1CA.B Page 14 of 335
BI
D
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
BI
D
T
O
T
A
L
S
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
:
C
P
1
1
0
8
,
2
0
1
1
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
o
n
d
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
,
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
1
1
-
1
4
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
:
C
i
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
Bi
d
D
a
t
e
:
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
'
S
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
:
21
8
,
8
3
7
.
0
0
$
AV
E
R
A
G
E
B
A
S
I
C
B
I
D
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
3
9
9
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
BA
S
I
C
B
I
D
S
P
R
E
A
D
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
-
$
B
a
s
i
c
B
I
D
A
m
o
u
n
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
$
S
p
r
e
a
d
%
LO
W
B
I
D
D
E
R
:
M
V
G
,
L
L
C
39
9
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
$
1
8
0
,
7
4
3
.
0
0
8
2
.
5
9
%
Se
c
o
n
d
B
i
d
d
e
r
:
Ba
s
i
c
B
I
D
(
T
a
x
n
o
t
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
)
T
o
t
a
l
B
I
D
(
T
a
x
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
)
MV
G
,
L
L
C
39
9
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
43
7
,
3
8
8
.
7
9
$
7/
1
0
/
1
2
7/
1
0
/
2
0
1
2
(
4
:
5
1
P
M
)
h:
\
p
r
o
j
\
b
i
d
t
a
b
s
\
C
P
1
1
0
8
B
T
.
x
l
s
1
CA.B Page 15 of 335
CA.B Page 16 of 335
CA.B Page 17 of 335
CA.B Page 18 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1006
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Final Pay Estimate
Vicinity Map
Photograph Exhibit
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 14 to
Contract No. 11-05 in the amount of $7,271.04 and accept construction of Project No.
CP1006, Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6.
Background Summary:
This project constructed a 1-million gallon steel water reservoir on a City owned parcel on Francis Court
SE in the Lakeland Hills service area. The reservoir provides additional storage for normal and emergency
uses, provides storage redundancy, and allows the existing Reservoir 5 in Lakeland Hills to be taken out of
service for maintenance. The project included a painted mural at a cost of approximately $11,000, which is
shown on the attached Photograph Exhibit.
This project was primarily funded with Build America Bond proceeds and a project budget contingency of
$107,602 remains in the 430 (Water) Fund.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dunsdon
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.C Page 19 of 335
Project No: CP1006 Project Title:
Project Manager: Leah Dunsdon
Initiation / Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: _8/16/10__ Permission to Advertise
Advertisement Date: _3/8/11__ Contract Award
Award Date: _4/4/11___ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total
430 Fund 169,877 169,877
430 Fund (Bond Funds)2,167,877 332,123 2,500,000
Total 2,167,877 502,000 0 0 2,669,877
Activity Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 39,498 39,498
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 251,240 251,240
Permits - City Costs 25,451 25,451
Construction Contract Bid 1,657,698 162,393 1,820,091
Change Order No. 1 (Fencing)4,380 4,380
Change Order No. 2 (PLC Unit)1,393 1,393
Change Order No. 3 (SCADA)1,025 1,025
Change Order No. 4 (SCADA)4,160 4,160
Change Order No. 5 (Full Containment)34,771 34,771
Line Item Changes (65,323)(65,323)
Construction Engineering - City Costs 60,426 25,000 12,000 7,500 104,926
Construction Engineering - Testing Services 38,163 15,000 7,500 5,000 65,663
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 95,401 179,599 275,000
Total 2,167,877 362,398 19,500 12,500 2,562,275
Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total
*430 Funds Budgeted ( )(2,167,877)(502,000)0 0 (2,669,877)
430 Funds Needed 2,167,877 362,398 19,500 12,500 2,562,275
*430 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (139,602)0 0 (107,602)
430 Funds Required 0 0 19,500 12,500 0
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
430 Water Budget Status
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6
Date: July 2, 2012
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
H:\PROJ\CP1006-Lakeland Resvoir 6\Budget\CP1006.BudgetStatusSheetv1.xls
7/2/2012
1 of 1
CA.C Page 20 of 335
CA.C Page 21 of 335
CA.C Page 22 of 335
CA.C Page 23 of 335
CA.C Page 24 of 335
CA.C Page 25 of 335
CA.C Page 26 of 335
CP1006: Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6
View from sidewalk on Francis Ct SE, looking south.
CA.C Page 27 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4840
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4840
Budget Status Sheet
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend that City Council adopt Resolution No. 4840.
Background Summary:
In 2009, the City of Auburn installed a variety of temporary flood control barriers on behalf of King County to protect
the City from the potential for flooding along the Green River and Mill Creek from the reduced capacity of the
Howard Hanson Dam. See attached vicinity map for the locations of the barriers.
The objective of this project is to remove the temporary flood control barriers and restore the disturbed areas back to
their orginal condition. Construction is anticipated to begin in August 2012 and be complete by December 2012.
The bid opening will not be held until July 17th, under Resolution No. 4840, staff is requesting authorization for the
Mayor to award this contract to the lowest responsible bidder to avoid delay of the project in order to meet the
condition in the Interlocal Agreement with King County for the completion of the emergency flood protection barrier
removal and site restoration that stipulates completing the removal of the barriers along the existing levees by
November 1, 2012 and the remaining barriers by December 31, 2012.
It is anticipated that funding for this project will be from the King County Flood Control District (KCFCD) (75%) and
from a loan by the District to the City from the District's Opportunity Fund (25%). A total contingency of $11,473
remains.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Truong
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:RES.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 28 of 335
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Resolution No. 4840
July 11, 2012
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 4 8 4 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO AWARD THE BID AND EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
NUMBER 12-14 FOR PROJECT EM0902, FLOOD
CONTROL BARRIER REMOVAL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn has approved a project to
remove the temporary flood control barriers and site restoration that were place in 2009
along the Green River and Mill Creek; and
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2012 the City Council approved Resolution No. 4830 to
enter into an Interlocal Agreement with King County or the completion of the emergency
flood protection barrier removal and site restoration that stipulates completing the
removal of the barriers along the existing levees by November 1, 2012 and the
remaining barriers by December 31, 2012; and
WHEREAS, a construction Bid Opening for the removal of the flood control
barriers and site restoration will be held on July 17, 2012; and
WHEREAS, waiting to award the construction contract until the next regularly
scheduled meeting would result in a three week delay of the construction start date; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Public Works Department will assess the bids
received and identify the Lowest Responsible Bidder; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to award and execute public works
construction contract 12-14, with all expediency to take advantage of the remaining
construction season.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
RES.A Page 29 of 335
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Resolution No. 4840
July 11, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby authorized to review bids,
award the bid, and execute an Agreement between the City of Auburn and the Lowest
Responsible Bidder for Project Number EM0902, Public Works Contract Number 12-14,
Flood Control Barrier Removal, which agreement shall conform with the Bid Documents,
provided that the bid amount does not exceed the project budget.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this ______day of_____________________, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
___________________________
PETER B. LEWIS,
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
RES.A Page 30 of 335
Project No: EM0902Project Title:
Project Manager: Kim Truong
Initiation/Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: _________ Permission to Advertise
Advertisement Date: _07/03/12___ Contract Award
Award Date: ___________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112013 Future Years Total
King County Flood Control District (KCFCD)1,605,520
432 Fund - Storm (KCFCD Opportunity Fund)535,174
Total 002,140,69400
Activity Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 85,169
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs
Construction Estimate 1,703,377
Authorized Contingency 200,000
Construction Engineering - City Costs 140,676
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs
Total 002,129,22200
Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
*KCFCD Funds Budgeted ( )00(1,605,520)0 (1,605,520)
KCFCD Funds Needed 001,596,9170 1,596,917
*KCFCD Fund Project Contingency ( )00(8,604)0(8,604)
KCFCD Funds Required 00000
Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
*432 Funds Budgeted ( )00(535,174)0 (535,174)
432 Funds Needed 00532,3060 532,306
*432 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(2,869)0(2,869)
432 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Temporary Flood Control Barrier Removal
Date: July 9, 2012
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
King County Flood Control District Budget Status
432 Storm (KCFCD Opportunity Fund) Budget Status
H:\PROJ\EM0902 Green River-Howard Hanson\EM0902 Contract 12-14 Temp. Flood Control Barriers
Removal\Budget\BudgetStatusSheet 062612.xlsx 1 of 1RES.A Page 31 of 335
RES.A Page 32 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
May 2012 Financial Report
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
May Financial Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
The purpose of the monthly financial reports is to summarize for the City Council the general state of city-
wide financial affairs and to highlight significant items or trends that the City Council should be aware of.
The following provides a high level summary of the City's financial performance. Further detail can be
found within the attached financial report.
The May status report is based on financial data available as of June 22, 2012. Sales tax information
represents business activity that occurred in March 2012.
General Fund:
The general fund is the City's largest fund and is used to account for the majority of City resources and
services except those required by statute or to be accounted for in another fund.
Year-to-date General Fund revenues were sufficient to support expenditures with financial performance
substantially unchanged from the same period last year, reflecting continued consumer concerns over the
state of the economy, unemployment, and economic conditions in Europe and Asia. As of the end of May,
the unemployment rate in Washington State was 8.3% and 6.9% in King County and compare to the
national unemployment rate of 8.2%[1].
General fund revenue collections totaled $23.0 million and compare to budget-to-date of $22.4 million and
collections of $23.2 million for the same period previous year. Tax revenues, the largest category of
revenue within the General Fund, totaled $19.1 million and compare to collections of $18.9 million for the
same period last year.
General Fund expenses totaled $19.5 million and compare to budget of $21.0 million and expenditures of
$19.6 million for the same period last year.
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 33 of 335
Enterprise Funds:
The City's eight enterprise funds account for operations with revenues primarily provided from user fees,
charges or contracts for services.
At the end of May, the Water fund ended with a slight operating loss of $91,000; the Sewer fund ended this
period with a $622,000 operating loss; and the Stormwater fund ended with an operating income of
$395,000.
The Golf Course ended the period with an operating loss of $321,000. Financial performance for the
Auburn Golf Course is expected to improve as play increases with better weather during the spring and
summer months.
Cemetery revenues at the end of May totaled $307,000 and were below expenses of $394,000.
Internal Service Funds:
Internal Service Funds provide services to other City departments and include functions such as
Insurance, Facilities, Information Services, and Equipment Rental. At the end of the year, revenue from
charges assessed to internal client departments was sufficient to meet expenses.
Investment Portfolio:
The City's total cash and investments at the end of May was $101.7 million and compare to $99.4 million
the previous month.
[1] Source: Washington State Employment Security Department and US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 34 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
General Fund 2011
Summary of Sources and Uses
Annual BudgetYTD BudgetYTD ActualYTD ActualAmountPercentage
OPERATING REVENUES
Property Tax 12,562,565 6,497,800 6,622,094 6,522,132 124,294 1.9%
Sales Tax (1)14,227,000 5,925,600 5,944,068 6,084,272 18,468 0.3%
Sales Tax - Annexation Credit 1,383,730 557,730 606,446 595,853 48,716 8.7%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,212,900 503,300 561,206 556,090 57,906 11.5%
Brokered Natural Gas Tax 260,000 141,700 181,661 168,114 39,961 28.2%
City Utilities Tax 2,620,200 1,041,200 1,075,831 966,514 34,631 3.3%
Admissions Tax 360,000 132,600 125,545 121,946 (7,055) -5.3%
Electric Tax 3,275,000 1,756,300 1,729,940 1,678,394 (26,360) -1.5%
Natural Gas Tax 1,295,820 836,100 747,170 728,141 (88,930) -10.6%
Cable TV Franchise Fee 703,600 352,200 400,941 403,943 48,741 13.8%
Cable TV Franchise Fee - Capital 75,000 36,600 31,508 31,983 (5,092) -13.9%
Telephone Tax 2,012,400 875,300 905,627 883,105 30,327 3.5%
Garbage Tax (external)150,000 59,700 53,946 56,183 (5,754) -9.6%
Leasehold Excise Tax 50,000 13,000 10,067 12,346 (2,933) N/A
Gambling Excise Tax 331,500
(1) The anticipated Streamlined Sales Tax for 2012 is $2 million. The year to date actual Sales Tax amount is adjusted
to include $833,686 Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation received from the State through the month of May.
191,400 128,226 117,576 (63,174) -33.0%
Taxes sub-total 40,519,715 18,920,530 19,124,276 18,926,591 203,746 1.1%
Business License Fees 200,000 56,300 115,119 103,219 58,819 104.5%
Building Permits 700,000 255,800 491,218 362,422 235,418 92.0%
Other Licenses & Permits 229,000 84,300 128,735 136,352 44,435 52.7%
Intergovernmental (Grants, etc)3,357,333 1,393,760 1,311,889 1,643,674 (81,871) -5.9%
Charges for Services:
General Government Services 64,600 27,200 54,720 35,968 27,520 101.2%
Public Safety 223,500 96,900 99,362 101,423 2,462 2.5%
Development Services Fees 627,000 209,800 367,465 179,743 157,665 75.2%
Culture and Recreation 920,000 424,100 394,701 369,066 (29,399) -6.9%
Fines and Forfeits 1,499,900 711,800 699,513 936,814 (12,287) -1.7%
Fees/Charges/Fines sub-total 7,821,333 3,259,960 3,662,723 3,868,681 402,763 12.4%
Interests and Other Earnings 115,000 46,700 28,334 28,537 (18,366) -39.3%
Rents, Leases and Concessions 311,000 138,600 118,376 168,235 (20,224) -14.6%
Contributions and Donations 20,500 6,600 22,089 16,128 15,489 234.7%
Other Miscellaneous 46,200 25,000 30,819 26,967 5,819 23.3%
Transfers In 17,000 17,000 17,000 78,439 - 0.0%
Insurance Recoveries- Capital & Operating 50,000 18,158 41,262 70,899 23,104 127.2%
Other Revenues sub-total 559,700 252,058 257,880 389,206 5,822 2.3%
Total Operating Revenues 48,900,748 22,432,548 23,044,879 23,184,478 612,331 2.7%
Operating Expenditures
Council & Mayor 869,890 358,990 373,733 312,271 (14,743) -4.1%
Municipal Court & Probation 3,399,260 1,302,860 1,222,290 1,175,334 80,570 6.2%
Human Resources 942,164 376,700 333,941 321,988 42,759 11.4%
Finance 1,235,590 551,000 453,121 509,974 97,879 17.8%
City Attorney 1,699,500 765,100 615,486 681,066 149,614 19.6%
Planning 3,883,620 1,516,700 1,498,842 1,403,236 17,858 1.2%
Community & Human Services 1,160,360 396,160 392,144 421,449 4,016 1.0%
Jail - SCORE 4,764,750 1,888,850 1,780,751 1,869,665 108,099 5.7%
Police 20,682,698 8,217,400 7,566,539 7,290,069 650,861 7.9%
Engineering 2,718,870 880,770 811,752 907,455 69,018 7.8%
Parks and Recreation 7,598,230 2,383,030 2,324,749 2,808,211 58,281 2.4%
Streets 3,415,280 1,032,780 819,608 1,052,030 213,172 20.6%
Non-Departmental 7,130,550 1,362,400 1,252,574 882,268 109,826 8.1%
Total Operating Expenditures 59,500,762 21,032,740 19,445,529 19,635,015 1,587,211 7.5%
2012 2012 YTD Budget vs. Actual
Favorable (Unfavorable)
1DI.A Page 35 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Overview
This financial overview reflects the City’s overall financial position for the fiscal period ending
May 31, 2012 and represents financial data available as of June 22, 2012. The budgeted year-to-
date revenues and operating expenses are based on the collection/disbursement average for the
same period of the two prior years.
General Fund revenues totaled $23.0 million and were above budget by 2.7%, or $612,000.
This period’s highlights include:
- Tax revenues totaled $19.1 million and were $204,000 above budget.
- Sales taxes totaled $5.9 million and were on target with budget.
- Revenue from Fees/Charges/Fines totaled $3.7 million and were $403,000 above budget
due to stronger than budgeted revenue from development activity.
- Other revenues totaled $258,000 and were 2.3% above budget.
General Fund expenses totaled $19.5 million and were $1.6 million below budget and compared
to expenses of $19.6 million for the same period last year.
Revenues
The combined total of property tax, sales/use tax, utility tax, gambling, and admissions tax
provide approximately 80% of all resources supporting general governmental activities. The
following section provides additional information on these sources.
Property Tax collections to date total $6.6 million and has returned to budgeted levels following
the previous month’s performance due to timing of payments. The majority of property tax
revenues are collected during the months of April and October, coinciding with the due date for
County property tax billings.
$0.0
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Property Taxes
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
2DI.A Page 36 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Sales taxes totaled $6.6 million and is on target with budget. Sales taxes include an estimate of
$167,151 for May’s portion of the Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation payments from the State of
Washington.
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
JanFebMarApr MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Sales & Use Tax
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
The following table breaks out the City’s base sales tax, excluding Criminal Justice, Annexation
Credit and Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation by major business sectors.
20112012
Component GroupActualActualAmoun
New Construction 489,132 455,332 (33,80
Manufacturing 265,221 126,714 (138,5
Transportation & Warehousing22,065 19,257 (2,8
Wholesale Trade 514,703 522,843 8,1
Automotive 1,099,474 1,181,603 82,1
Retail Trade 1,658,812 1,620,924 (37,88
Services 1,141,959 1,196,727 54,7
Miscellaneous 95,405 18,146 (77,2
Chan
tPercentage
0)-6.9%
07)-52.2%
08)-12.7%
40 1.6%
29 7.5%
8)-2.3%
68 4.8%
59)-81.0%
YTD Total 5,286,771 5,141,546 (145,225) -2.7%
g e from 2011
Year to Date through May
Comparison of Sales Tax Collections by SIC Group
As shown above, sales taxes by business sector totaled $5.14 million and are 2.7% less than the
same period last year due in part to two adjustments by the Washington State Department of
Revenue that reduced the City’s sales taxes by $93,985 1 .
1 Wa. State Department of Revenue adjustments reduced sales taxes within the manufacturing and services sectors
by $73,971 and $20,014, respectively.
3DI.A Page 37 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
$9.0
$10.0
JanFebMa
Utility Taxes consists of City inter-fund utility taxes (Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste) and
external utility taxes (Electric, Natural gas, Telephone and Solid Waste). Year-to-date collections
totaled $4.5 million and is running slightly below budget. The following table presents utility tax
collections by source:
Cable TV Franchise Fees exceed budget by $44,000 and are tracking 2011 collection levels. This
revenue source is likely to outperform budget by the end of 2012 and end at levels similar to the
previous year.
r AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Utility Tax
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
201120122012
Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmo
City Interfund Utility Taxes966,514 1,041,200 1,075,831 109,317 11.3%3
Electric 1,678,394 1,756,300 1,729,940 51,546 3.1%(2
Natural Gas 728,141 836,100 747,170 19,029 2.6%(
Telephone 883,105 875,300 905,627 22,522 2.6%30
Solid Waste 56,183 59,700 53,946 (2,237) -4.0%(
YTD Total 4,312,337 4,568,600 4,512,514 200,177 4.6%(
Year to Date through May
Utility Tax by Type
2012 vs. 201120
untPercentage
4,6313.3%
6,360)-1.5%
88,930)-10.6%
,327 3.5%
5,754)-9.6%
56,086)-1.2%
Annual Total 8,890,614 9,353,420
12 vs. Budg et
4DI.A Page 38 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Cable TV Franchise Fee
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
Licenses and Permits include business licenses, building permits, plumbing, electric and other
licenses and permit fees. Building permit fees and Business licenses make up 80% of the annual
budgeted revenue in this category.
Building permit revenues were $491,000 and exceeded both budget and prior year levels of
$256,000 and $362,000, respectively. Building permit activity has increased, reflecting the
broader trend of increased construction activity in the region.
$0
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Building Permits
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
Business License revenues totaled $115,000 and exceeded budget due to the timing of payments.
The revenue for the year is billed out late in December and most payments are received between
January and February. This revenue source is expected to level out for the remainder of the year
until December when collections increase as payments for 2013 are received.
5DI.A Page 39 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Business Licenses
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
Intergovernmental includes Grants (Direct & Indirect Federal, State and Local); State shared
revenues and compact revenue from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Collections totaled $1.3
million and is below budget due to the timing of anticipated distributions by the State of
Washington from the sale of state owned liquor stores 2 .
20112012 2012
Revenue ActualBudgetActual% Change
Federal Grants 119,676 155,700 128,802 7.6%
State Grants 38,636 17,600 36,326 -6.0%
Interlocal Grants 3,151 56,700 2,500 -20.7%
State Shared Revenue1,084,600 957,060 794,536 -26.7%
Muckleshoot Casino Emerg.385,731 386,700 345,875 -10.3%
Intergovernmental Service11,880 - 3,850 -67.6%
YTD Total 1,643,674 1,573,760 1,311,889 -20.2%
Year to Date through May
Intergovernmental
2012 vs. 2011
% Change
-17.3%
0.0%
-95.6%
-17.0%
-10.6%
N/A
-16.6%
Annual Total 3,432,394 3,537,333
2012 vs. Budg
et
2 The City of Auburn received $188,230 from the sale of State owned liquor stores in the month of June 2012 and
will be reflected in next month’s monthly financial report. In addition, the City’s share of liquor excise taxes and
liquor profits will be revised starting July 1. Liquor excise taxes will be suspended for a twelve month period and
will be reinstated at a lowered level starting July 1, 2013 while liquor profits will be reduced to 2011 levels starting
July 1. These changes were made as a result of the State Legislature’s effort to balance the State budget during the
2012 legislative session.
6DI.A Page 40 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
201120122012
Revenue ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage
Trial Court Improvements 11,234 12,300 11,316 82 N/A(984) N/A
Court Interpreter Program 6,643 6,960 10,872 4,229 N/A3,912 N/A
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 586,091 380,300 388,328 (197,763) -33.7%8,028 2.1%
Criminal Justice -High Crime75,325 - 71,399 (3,926) -5.2%71,399 N/A
Criminal Justice -Population 7,690 47,300 7,766 76 1.0%(39,534) -83.6%
Criminal Justice -Spec. Prog.29,045 27,600 29,308 263 0.9%1,708 6.2%
State DUI 6,262 3,200 6,777 514 8.2%3,577 111.8%
Fire Insurance Premium Tax 66,116 65,000 - (66,116) N/A(65,000) N/A
Liquor Excise Tax 169,003 81,000 174,785 5,782 3.4%93,785 115.8%
Liquor Profits 127,191 153,400 93,986 (33,205) -26.1%(59,414) N/A
Liquor Store Closure Proceeds - 180,000 - - N/A(180,000) N/A
YTD Total 1,084,600 957,060 794,536 (290,064) -26.7%(162,524) -17.0%
Annual Total 2,073,650 2,060,690
Year to Date through May
State Shared Revenues
2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budg et
Charges for Services consists of general governmental services, public safety, development service
fees and cultural & recreation fees and totaled $916,000. Development service fees and culture
and recreation fees make up 81% of the revenue within this category. Development services
revenues totaled $367,000 compared to budget of $210,000 due to stronger revenues from
development plan-check fees. Culture and recreation fees are beginning to improve over 2011
levels, reflecting increased registrations for summer classes.
201120122012
Revenue ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAm
General Government 35,968 27,200 54,720 18,752 52.13%
Public Safety 101,423 96,900 99,362 (2,061) -2.0%
Development Services179,743 209,800 367,465 187,722 104.4%157,
Culture & Recreation369,066 424,100 394,701 25,635 6.9%(
Year to Date through May
Charges for Services by Type
2012 vs. 20112
ountPercentage
27,520 101.18%
2,462 2.5%
665 75.2%
29,399)-6.9%
YTD Total 686,200 758,000 916,248 230,047 33.5%158,248 20.9%
Annual Total1,651,371 1,835,100
012 vs. Budg et
7DI.A Page 41 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Development Service Fees
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
rJanFebMa AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Culture & Recreation
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
Fines & Penalties totaled $700,000 and is slightly below of $712,000. The table below reflects
the revised budget for the red light photo enforcement program, reflecting actual and forecasted
financial performance.
8DI.A Page 42 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
201120122012
Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage
Civil Penalties 8,566 6,400 6,924 (1,642) -19.2%524 8.2%
Civil Infraction Penalties 298,711 261,700 282,581 (16,130) -5.4%20,881 8.0%
Red Light Photo Enforcement429,454 248,800 248,716 (180,738) -42.1%(84) 0.0%
Parking Infractions 76,177 75,000 50,689 (25,487) -33.5%(24,311) -32.4%
Criminal Traffic Misdemeanor35,763 50,200 46,661 10,897 30.5%(3,539) -7.1%
Criminal Non-Traffic Fines38,490 41,600 42,189 3,698 9.6%589 1.4%
Criminal Costs 5,901 4,300 7,089 1,188 20.1%2,789 64.9%
Non-Court Fines & Penalties43,753 23,800 14,666 (29,086) -66.5%(9,134) -38.4%
YTD Total 936,814 711,800 699,513 (237,301) -25.3%(12,287) -1.7%
Year to Date through May
Fines & Forfeits by Type
2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Bud
Annual Total 1,940,326 1,499,900
g et
$0.0
OctNovDec
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Fines & Penalties
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
$0.6
$0.7
$0.8
$0.9
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Photo Enforcement
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
9DI.A Page 43 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Miscellaneous revenues include interest and other investment earnings, rents, leases &
concessions, contributions & donations and other miscellaneous income. Revenues in this
category totaled $200,000 and are below budget by $17,000 due primarily to lowered revenue
from facility rentals and lowered interest earnings.
201120122012
Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageA
Interest & Investments 28,537 46,700 28,334 (204) -0.7%
Rents & Leases 168,235 138,600 118,376 (49,859) -29.6%(
Contributions & Donations16,128 6,600 22,089 5,961 37.0%
Other Miscellaneous Revenue26,967 25,000 30,819 3,852 14.3%
Miscellaneous Revenues by Type
Year to Date through May
2012 vs. 2011
mountPercentage
(18,366)-39.3%
20,224)-14.6%
15,489 234.7%
5,819 23.3%
YTD Total 239,868 216,900 199,619 (40,249) -16.8%(17,281) -8.0%
Annual Total 649,927 492,700
2012 vs. Budg
et
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is receipted into the Capital Improvement Projects Fund
and is used for governmental capital projects. REET revenue totaled $520,000 and is slightly
below budget.
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
$1.4
$1.6
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDe
c
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Real Estate Excise Tax
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
10DI.A Page 44 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
eteryGolf
06,637 334,639
- -
- 69,252
6,637403,891
119,789108,388
50,080 485,040
- -
- -
24,503131,472
394,372 724,900
87,735)(321,009)
89 179
1,431 -
(11,134) -
(9,614) 179
97,349)(320,830)
- -
0,00014,608
- -
0,00014,608
02,651 (306,222)
814,709 5,144,962
ENDING FUND BALANCE May 31, 2012 63,203,713 72,756,384 48,320,735 1,695,536 9,564,172 917,360 4,838,740
Enterprise Funds
The following table provides an analysis of the City’s Enterprise funds – showing 2012 revenues
and expenditures by fund.
WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCem
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services 3,511,617 1,898,876 3,044,704 4,757,347 6,601 3
Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 5,259,820 - - -
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - - - - 249,338
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 3,511,617 7,158,696 3,044,704 4,757,347 255,939 30
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration 992,166 795,304 831,971 333,632 234,983
Operations & Maintenance 1,703,952 1,038,680 1,286,867 488,012 - 2
Waste Management Payments - - - 3,065,355 -
Sewer Metro Services - 5,211,643 - - -
Depreciation & Amortization 906,670 735,485 530,605 7,841 163,732
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 3,602,788 7,781,112 2,649,443 3,894,840 398,715
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(91,171) (622,416) 395,261 862,507 (142,776) (
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 17,790 5,669 5,502 216 658
Other Non Operating Revenue 108,479 39,693 34,470 72,132 370
Other Non Operating Expense - - - - (25,238)
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)126,269 45,362 39,972 72,348 (24,210)
35,098 (577,054) 435,233 934,855 (166,986) (
Contributions 189,920 109,432 163,298 - -
Transfers In - - - - - 20
Transfers Out (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) - -
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS 139,920 59,432 113,298 - - 20
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 175,018 (517,622) 548,531 934,855 (166,986) 1
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE January 1, 2012 63,028,695 73,274,006 47,772,204 760,681 9,731,158
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS &
TRANSFERS
11DI.A Page 45 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
The following table presents the Working Capital Statements for the City’s Enterprise funds.
Working capital is generally defined as the difference between current assets and current
liabilities.
WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCem
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services 3,511,617 1,898,876 3,044,704 4,757,347 6,601 3
Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 5,259,820 - - -
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - - - - 249,338
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 3,511,617 7,158,696 3,044,704 4,757,347 255,939 3
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries & Wages 850,877 561,574 755,304 175,425 7,947 1
Benefits 378,570 243,212 332,205 76,400 2,675
Supplies 61,683 13,436 16,516 7,827 -
Other Service Charges 902,122 695,128 447,243 390,084 224,361
Intergovernmental Services - - 9,098 95,033 -
Waste Management Payments - - - 3,065,355 -
Sewer Metro Services - 5,211,643 - - -
Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies 502,866 320,634 554,763 76,875 -
Other Expenses - - 3,710 - -
Depreciation & Amortization 906,670 735,485 530,605 7,841 163,732
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 3,602,788 7,781,112 2,649,444 3,894,840 398,715 3
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(91,171) (622,416) 395,260 862,507 (142,776) (
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 17,790 5,669 5,502 216 658
Other Non Operating Revenue 108,479 39,693 34,470 72,132 370
Other Non Operating Expense - - - - (25,238)
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)126,269 45,362 39,972 72,348 (24,210)
Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital
Depreciation 906,670 735,485 530,605 7,841 163,732
941,768 158,431 965,837 942,696 (3,254) (
Increase in Contributions -System Development 189,920 109,432 160,092 - -
Increase in Contributions -Area Assessments - - 3,206 - -
Operating Transfers In - - - - - 2
Increase in Restricted Net Assets 5,024 29,823 - - (5,472)
Decrease in Long term Receivables - 45,000 - - -
Increase in Deferred Credits - - - - (2,427)
TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS 194,944 184,255 163,298 - (7,899) 2
Net Change in Restricted Net Assets 272,127 142,073 128,582 - (6,053)
Increase in Fixed Assets - Salaries 52,732 46,034 18,414 - 14,465
Increase in Fixed Assets - Benefits 21,056 17,403 7,939 - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Site Improvements 33,262 - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment 72,714 - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction 1,822,930 684,791 410,920 - -
Operating Transfers Out 50,000 50,000 50,000 - -
Debt Service Principal - - - - -
TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS 2,324,821 940,301 615,855 - 8,412
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (1,188,109) (597,615) 513,281 942,696 (19,565)
NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS
eteryGolf
06,637 334,639
- -
- 69,252
06,637 403,891
87,445 226,584
91,411 111,108
40,159 127,597
23,309 60,634
- -
- -
- -
27,545 67,505
- -
24,503 131,472
94,372 724,900
87,735)(321,009)
89 179
1,431 -
(11,134) -
(9,614) 179
24,503 131,472
72,846)(189,358)
- -
- -
00,00014,608
-
- -
- -
00,00014,608
- (19,365)
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- (19,365)
127,154 (155,385)
BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL January 1, 2012 16,945,811 12,806,527 9,102,000 632,263 961,633 71,820 68,320
ENDING WORKING CAPITAL May 31, 2012 15,757,702 12,208,912 9,615,280 1,574,959 942,068 198,974 (87,065)
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (1,188,109) (597,615) 513,281 942,696 (19,565) 127,154 (155,385)
12DI.A Page 46 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
The Water Utility ended with a $91,000 net loss.
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
Water Revenues ($) vs Water Sold (ccf)
2011 -Present
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2011 Water Sales ($)
2012 Water Sales ($)
2011 Water Sold (ccf)
2012 Water Sold (ccf)
The Sewer Utility ended the period with a $622,000 net operating loss while the Stormwater
Utility ended with $395,000 in net income.
Auburn Golf Course (AGC) revenues from green fees increased to $133,000 as compared to
$125,000 the previous month, reflecting an improvement the number of rounds played. The
number of rounds played year-to-date totals 14,216 in 2012 compared to 12,531 in 2011. While
the AGC ended with a net operating loss of $321,000, its financial performance is expected to
continue improving as play increases during the spring/summer season.
$0
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Golf Course Operating Revenues by Month
(2012 vs 2011)
2012 Monthly Budget
2012 Actual
20
11 Actual
13DI.A Page 47 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
The Cemetery Fund ended with a $88,000 net operating loss as compared to $50,000 the
previous month. The decline is a result of reduced revenue from marker sales and
openings/closings.
$0
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Cemetery Operating Revenues by Month
(2012 vs 2011)
2012 Monthly
Budget
2012 Actual
2011 Actual
14DI.A Page 48 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Equipment
Rental
01,250,280
6 -
61,250,280
-291,150
7627,734
3295,564
01,214,448
4)35,832
6 2,128
-8,837
--
6 10,965
8)46,797
0 72,714
--
-(7,000)
0 65,714
8)112,511
310,135,919
ENDING FUND BALANCE May 31, 2012 1,495,251 2,008,583 4,164,645 10,248,430
Internal Service Funds
The following table provides an analysis of the City’s Internal Service funds – showing 2012
revenues and expenditures by fund.
Information
InsuranceFacilities Services
OPERATING REVENUES:
Interfund Charges for Services - 1,464,282 1,722,96
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 43,760 38,90
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 1,508,042 1,761,86
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration 690,217 -
Operations & Maintenance - 899,628 1,730,26
Depreciation & Amortization - - 222,17
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 690,217 899,628 1,952,44
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(690,217) 608,414 (190,57
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 788 1,120 1,80
Other Non Operating Revenue (sale of fixed asset)- -
Other Non Operating Expense - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)788 1,120 1,80
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS (689,429) 609,534 (188,76
Contributions - - 3,23
Transfers In - 97,380
Transfers Out - (268,750)
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS - (171,370) 3,23
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (689,429) 438,164 (185,53
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE January 1, 2012 2,184,680 1,570,419 4,350,18
15DI.A Page 49 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Equipment
Rental
01,250,280
6
61,250,280
2177,258
8 69,987
8400,089
9182,425
0 89,125
3295,564
01,214,448
4)35,832
6 2,128
-8,837
--
6 10,965
3295,564
5342,361
--
0 72,714
--
0 72,714
0 33,823
-18,493
8916,287
--
-7,000
8975,603
3)(560,528)
65,793,165
35,232,637
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (689,429) 339,463 (234,423) (560,528)
The following table presents the Working Capital Statements for the City’s Internal Service funds.
Working capital is generally defined as the difference between current assets and current
liabilities.
Information
InsuranceFacilities Services
OPERATING REVENUES:
Interfund Charges for Services - 1,464,282 1,722,96
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 43,760 38,90
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 1,508,042 1,761,86
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries & Wages - 273,636 546,46
Benefits - 118,845 223,81
Supplies - 41,374 88,41
Other Service Charges 690,217 424,983 751,11
Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies - 40,790 120,45
Depreciation & Amortization - - 222,17
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 690,217 899,628 1,952,44
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(690,217) 608,414 (190,57
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 788 1,120 1,80
Other Non Operating Revenue (sale of fixed asset)- -
Other Non Operating Expense - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)788 1,120 1,80
Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital
Depreciation - - 222,17
(689,429) 609,534 33,40
Increase in Contributions -Other Government - -
Increase in Contributions -Other Funds - - 3,23
Operating Transfers In - 97,380
TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS - 97,380 3,23
Net Change in Restricted Net Assets - - 3,23
Increase in Fixed Assets - Site Improvements - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment - - 267,82
Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction - 98,701
Operating Transfers Out - 268,750
TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS - 367,451 271,05
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (689,429) 339,463 (234,42
BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL January 1, 2012 2,184,680 1,622,449 3,118,68
ENDING WORKING CAPITAL May 31, 2012 1,495,251 1,961,912 2,884,26
NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS
16DI.A Page 50 of 335
Monthly Financial Report May 2012
Operating expenses within the Insurance Fund represents the premium cost-pool that will be
allocated monthly to other City funds over the course of 2012. As a result, this balance will
gradually diminish each month throughout the entire year.
The Information Services Fund ended with a net operating loss – reflecting the timing of
expenditures.
No significant variances are reported in the Facilities Fund or Equipment Rental Fund. Both
funds have had sufficient revenues to cover year-to-date expenses.
Contact Information
This report is prepared by the Finance Department. Additional financial information can also be
viewed at our website: http://www.auburnwa.gov/. For any questions about the report please
contact us at mchaw@auburnwa.gov or scoleman@auburnwa.gov.
17DI.A Page 51 of 335
SALES TAX SUMMARY
MAY 2012 SALES TAX DISTRIBUTIONS (FOR NOVEMBER - MARCH 2012 RETAIL ACTIVITY)
2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD
NAICS CONSTRUCTION (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff NAICS AUTOMOTIVE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff
236 Construction of Buildings 582,840 205,548 167,616 -18.5%441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer 2,560,962 1,010,133 1,090,111 7.9%
237 Heavy and Civil Construction 108,727 34,608 51,917 50.0%447 Gasoline Stations 224,459 89,342 91,492 2.4%
238 Specialty Trade Contractors 604,245 248,976 235,799 -5.3%TOTAL AUTOMOTIVE 2,785,421$ 1,099,474$ 1,181,603$ 7.5%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 1,295,813$ 489,132$ 455,332$ -6.9%Overall Change from Previous Year 82,128$
Overall Change from Previous Year (33,800)$
2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD
2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD NAICS RETAIL TRADE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff
NAICS MANUFACTURING (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings 218,335 89,594 93,969 4.9%
311 Food Manufacturing 2,674 1,083 1,562 44.2%443 Electronics and Appliances 126,870 60,779 60,759 0.0%
312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 3,864 1,563 1,665 6.5%444 Building Material and Garden 382,504 134,543 145,810 8.4%
313 Textile Mills 959 74 56 -24.2%445 Food and Beverage Stores 330,776 136,325 134,695 -1.2%
314 Textile Product Mills 2,625 674 2,449 263.5%446 Health and Personal Care Store 148,387 64,924 66,763 2.8%
315 Apparel Manufacturing 2,519 2,380 176 -92.6%448 Clothing and Accessories 754,407 333,265 331,450 -0.5%
316 Leather and Allied Products 175 14 55 306.3%451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books 126,042 60,402 57,494 -4.8%
321 Wood Product Manufacturing 24,075 9,735 7,816 -19.7%452 General Merchandise Stores 967,627 464,510 426,125 -8.3%
322 Paper Manufacturing 11,026 6,617 1,780 -73.1%453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 489,259 207,978 191,455 -7.9%
323 Printing and Related Support 38,511 18,715 13,988 -25.3%454 Nonstore Retailers 235,923 106,493 112,405 5.6%
324 Petroleum and Coal Products 9,771 2,863 2,926 2.2%TOTAL RETAIL TRADE 3,780,129$ 1,658,812$ 1,620,924$ -2.3%
325 Chemical Manufacturing 7,937 2,843 2,409 -15.3%Overall Change from Previous Year (37,888)$
326 Plastics and Rubber Products 9,777 4,529 3,950 -12.8%
327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 16,218 4,319 5,611 29.9%
331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 452 59 1,111 1787.2%2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD
332 Fabricated Metal Product Manuf 19,661 9,002 5,503 -38.9%NAICS SERVICES (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff
333 Machinery Manufacturing 14,242 5,401 5,905 9.3%51*Information 481,043 170,770 163,185 -4.4%
334 Computer and Electronic Produc 16,776 6,351 3,348 -47.3%52*Finance and Insurance 65,518 27,058 11,086 b -59.0%
335 Electric Equipment, Appliances 780 115 243 110.3%53*Real Estate, Rental, Leasing 303,750 118,835 129,686 9.1%
336 Transportation Equipment Man 362,149 173,080 49,513 a -71.4%541 Professional, Scientific, Tech 174,718 79,575 71,499 -10.1%
337 Furniture and Related Products 13,135 4,033 6,718 66.6%551 Company Management 351 52 4 -91.3%
339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 25,531 11,773 9,932 -15.6%56*Admin. Supp., Remed Svcs 294,603 101,877 111,934 9.9%
TOTAL MANUFACTURING 582,858$ 265,221$ 126,714$ -52.2%611 Educational Services 52,563 24,010 19,105 -20.4%
Overall Change from Previous Year (138,507)$ 62*Health Care Social Assistance 40,737 8,770 14,946 70.4%
71*Arts and Entertainment 148,629 81,889 85,241 4.1%
72*Accomodation and Food Svcs 838,924 326,852 368,016 12.6%
2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 81*Other Services 389,241 167,065 164,436 -1.6%
NAICS TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff 92*Public Administration 92,163 35,207 57,588 63.6%
481 Air Transportation 24 24 - -100.0%TOTAL SERVICES 2,882,241$ 1,141,959$ 1,196,727$ 4.8%
482 Rail Transportation 17,831 6,589 3,308 -49.8%Overall Change from Previous Year 54,768$
484 Truck Transportation 36,261 6,208 5,989 -3.5%
485 Transit and Ground Passengers 68 39 218 462.6%
488 Transportation Support 18,083 7,154 7,001 -2.1%2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD
491 Postal Service 202 89 93 4.7%NAICS MISCELLANEOUS (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff
492 Couriers and Messengers 1,492 682 306 -55.0%000 Unknown 1,958 383 1 -99.7%
493 Warehousing and Storage 3,121 1,281 2,341 82.8%111-115 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 7,355 2,163 1,177 -45.6%
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 77,083$ 22,065$ 19,257$ -12.7%211-221 Mining & Utilities 21,830 5,557 9,708 74.7%
Overall Change from Previous Year (2,808)$ 999 Unclassifiable Establishments 192,496 87,302 7,260 -91.7%
TOTAL SERVICES 223,639$ 95,405$ 18,146$ -81.0%
Overall Change from Previous Year (77,259)$
2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD
NAICS WHOLESALE TRADE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Mar '11)(Nov '11-Mar '12)% Diff
423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 1,095,905 447,179 460,463 3.0%GRAND TOTAL 12,887,267$ 5,286,772$ 5,141,547$
424 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable 150,480 65,226 60,373 -7.4%Overall Change from Previous Year (145,224)$ -2.7%
425 Wholesale Electronic Markets 13,698 2,298 2,008 -12.6%
TOTAL WHOLESALE 1,260,083$ 514,703$ 522,843$ 1.6%
Overall Change from Previous Year 8,141$
a. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Nov 2011 (adjustment: -$73,971).
b. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Dec 2011 (adjustment: -$20,014).
05/29/12 file:Monthly Sales Tax Report.xls
Prepared by Auburn Financial Planning
18DI.A Page 52 of 335
Investment PurchasePurchaseMaturityYield to
Type Date Price DateMaturity
State Investment PoolVarious 79,135,766$ Various 0.14%
KeyBank Money MarketVarious 14,473,014Various 0.15%
US Treasury 05/04/1990 57,75005/15/20165.72%
FFCB 6/6/20112,000,0006/6/20141.180%
FHLB 6/13/20112,000,0006/13/20141.150%
FHLMC 12/19/20112,000,00012/19/20141.000%
FNMA 12/29/20112,000,00012/29/20140.900%
Total Cash & Investments 101,666,530$ 0.220%
Investment Mix% of Total
State Investment Pool 77.8%Current 6-month treasury rate0.15%
KeyBank Money Market 14.2%Current State Pool rate0.14%
US Treasury 0.1%KeyBank Money Market0.15%
FHLB 2.0%Blended Auburn rate0.22%
FFCB 2.0%
FHLMC 2.0%
FNMA 2.0%
100.0%
City of Auburn
Investment Portfolio Summary
May 31, 2012
Summary
19DI.A Page 53 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4837
Date:
July 9, 2012
Department:
Parks/Art and Recreation
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4837
Resolution No. 4406
Letter of Work Stopage
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolutin No. 4837.
Background Summary:
The Auburn City Council approved Resolution No. 4406 on October 20, 2008 authorizing the Mayor to
enter into an agreement with Virginia Paquette for the design, fabrication and installation of two (2) public
art pieces to be used in the lobby area of the proposed Auburn community center. The approved art
proposal included two separate elements that would be installed in the lobby of the new Auburn
Community Center inclusive of the "Green River" a suspended stacked glass sculpture, and the "White
River" a sculptural wood collage made from joined pieces of the cherry wood felled from the site, and that
with this two-part project, the majority of the artist's budget was being allocated towards the "Green River"
with complicated engineering, logistics and expensive materials.
The contracted artist has been paid half of the total contract amount of $85,000 authorized by Resolution
No. 4406. On June 1, 2009, the contracted artist was notified by the City that her contract was being
placed on an "on hold" status pending the City's obtainment of funding for the construction of the Auburn
Community Center, and as such, no additional work has been completed by the artist. In May, 2012, the
Les Gove Community Campus Committee requested City staff and the Auburn Arts Commission review
the 1% for Public Art project initially developed for the Auburn Community Center. On June 12, 2012, the
Public Art Committee of the Auburn Arts Commission met to discuss the Community Center Public Art
project and are recommending that the City modify its contract with the artist to redefine the project scope
to focus on the creation of artwork on the "White River" (wood) element and to remove the "Green
River" (glass) element.
The recommendation of the Public Art Committee of the Auburn Arts Commission would require a
renegotiation of the previously approved contract amount. In addition, the Committee recommended to
authorize the artist to initiate work prior to the completion of the Auburn Community Center with the
provisions that the artwork be built to the specifications of the building and be stored and installed at a later
date. The renegotiation of the project scope and budget with the artist would allow the City to utilize
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 54 of 335
anticipated budget savings for the purpose of design the interior lobby space as a gallery/museum area.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works, Les Gove Community Campus
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Faber
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 55 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4837
July 5, 2012
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4837
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE
MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT PREVIOUSLY
AUTHORIZED WITH THE PASSAGE OF RESOLUTION
NO. 4406 WITH VIRGINIA PAQUETTE FOR PUBLIC
ART AT THE AUBURN COMMUNITY CENTER AT THE
LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council approved Resolution No. 4406 on
October 20, 2008 authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement with Virginia
Paquette for the design, fabrication and installation of two (2) public art pieces to
be used in the lobby area of the proposed Auburn community center; and
WHEREAS, the approved art proposal included two separate elements
that would be installed in the lobby of the new Auburn Community Center
inclusive of the “Green River” a suspended stacked glass sculpture, and the
“White River” a sculptural wood collage made from joined pieces of the cherry
wood felled from the site, and that with this two-part project, the majority of the
artist’s budget was being allocated towards the “Green River” with complicated
engineering, logistics, and expensive materials; and
WHEREAS, the contracted artist has been paid half of the total contract
amount of $85,000 authorized by Resolution No. 4406; and
WHERES, on June 1, 2009, the contracted artist was notified by the City
that her contract was being placed on an “on hold” status pending the City’s
obtainment of funding for the construction of the Auburn Community Center, and
as such, no additional work has been completed by the artist; and
DI.B Page 56 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4837
July 5, 2012
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, in May, 2012 the Les Gove Community Campus Committee
requested City staff and the Auburn Arts Commission review the 1% for Public
Art project initially developed for the Auburn Community Center; and
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, the Public Art Committee of the Auburn
Arts Commission met to discuss the Community Center Public Art project and
are recommending that the City modify its contract with the artist to redefine the
project scope to focus on the creation of artwork on the “White River” (wood)
element and to remove the “Green River” (glass) element; and
WHEREAS, the recommendation of the Public Art Committee of the
Auburn Arts Commission was to require a renegotiation of the previously
approved contract amount; and
WHEREAS, the recommendation of the Public Art Committee of the
Auburn Arts Commission also includes a recommendation to authorize the artist
to initiate work prior to the completion of the Auburn Community Center with the
provisions that the artwork be built to the specifications of the building and be
stored and installed at a later date; and
WHEREAS, a renegotiation of the project scope and budget with the artist
would allow the City to utilize anticipated budget savings for the purpose of
design the interior lobby space as a gallery/museum area.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE as follows:
DI.B Page 57 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4837
July 5, 2012
Page 3 of 3
Section 1. Contract Modification Negotiations and Execution. The
Mayor is authorized to conduct negotiations for amendments to the contract
authorized by Resolution No. 4066, and upon successful conclusion of said
negotiations, the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute a contract
modification for project scope and budget with Virginia Paquette for the provision
of public art for the Auburn Community Center at the Les Gove Community
Campus.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby
authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to
carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect
upon passage and signatures hereon.
DATED AND SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF_________________, 2012.
________________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.B Page 58 of 335
RESOLUTION NO. 4 4 0 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH VIRGINIA
PAQUETTE TO DESIGN, FABRICATE, AND INSTALL A PUBLIC
ART PIECE INTO THE DESIGN OF THE NEW AUBURN
COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING AND SITE
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn is currently designing the new Auburn
Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with Artist Virginia Paquette to design,
build and install artwork for this site; and
WHEREAS, the art work is to be an integrated design component of the Auburn
Community Center, requiring coordination befinreen the Artist and the City's architects
and contractor selected to construct the Auburn Community Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby authorized to enter into an
agreement with Virginia Paquette to design, fabricate, and install the integrated art work,
in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto and designated as Exhibit
A", and incorporated by reference in this resolution.
Section 2. The Mayor is further authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Resolution No. 4406
October 8, 2008
Page 1DI.B Page 59 of 335
J10
SIGNED and DATED this day of October, 2008.
CITY OF AUBURN
P TER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APP VE S TO FORM:~
Daniel B. i, City ttorney
Resolution No. 4406
October 8, 2008
Page 2DI.B Page 60 of 335
AGREEMENT FOR ARTWORK
This Agreement is made: anct:entered into this a24" day of October, 2008, by and between the City
of Auburn, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington ("City") and VIRGINIA
PAQUETTE, whose address and phone number are, 5607 -16'h Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105;
206.524.6929. ("ArtisY')
WHEREAS, the City is currently designing the Auburn Community Center ("Center"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with Artist to design, build and install artwork ("Work") for the
Auburn Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the Work is to be an integrated design component of the Auburn Community Center,
requiring coordination befinreen the Artist, the City's architects, and the contractor selected to construct the
Auburn Community Center,
NOW THEREFORE THt CITY AND THE ARTIST IN CONSIDERATION OF THE CONDITIONS
AND COVENANTS HEREIN DO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF SERVICE
1.1 GENERAL
The Artist shall, in consultation with the City's architect, BLRB Architects ("BLRB"), design
the Work, which shall be integrated into the over-all design of the Center. The Artist shall
also consult with BLRB in BLRB's design of the Center and BLRB's oversight of the Center's
construction.
The Artist shall be responsible for all services and shall furnish all supplies, material, and
equipment as necessary for the design, execution, fabrication, transportation and installation
of the Work at the Site.
The Artist shall coordinate the design, fabrication and installation of the Work with BLRB and
the contractor selected to construct the Auburn Community Center ("Contractor").
1.2 POST-INSTALLATION
A,_The City will provide photo documentation of the Work for City files. The City will
provide a copy of this documentation to the Artist.
B.The Artist shall be available at such time or times as may be agreed between the
City and the Artist to attend any presentation ceremonies relating to the transfer of
the Work to the City. The City shall use its best efforts to arrange for publicity for the
completed Work.
C.Upon installation of the Work, the Artist shall provide to the City written instructions
for appropriate maintenance and preservation of the Work.
1.3 FINAL ACCEPTANCE
A.The Artist shall advise the City in writing when all services required have been
completed in substantial conformity as presented to the Community Center
Subcommittee.
B.The City shall notify the Artist in writing of its final acceptance of the Work.
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Paaa 1 of 7
DI.B Page 61 of 335
1.4 RISK OF LOSS
The risk of loss or damage to the Work shall be borne by the Artist until final acceptance,
and the Artist shall take such measures as are necessary to protect the Work from loss or
damage until final acceptance, including any protective measures necessary to prevent
damage to the Work during construction of the Center.
1.5 INDEMNIFICATION
The Artist agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its agents, representatives, and
employees harmless from and against any and all claims, causes of action or demands or
any form of liability of any nature arising out of the pertormance of the Work and the
obligations contained in this Agreement on the part of the Artist, the ArtisYs agents,
representatives, and employees except where such claims arise solely from the negligent
acts of the City, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1.6 TITLE
Title to the Work shall pass to the City upon final acceptance.
1.7 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS, MODELS
Upon final acceptance of the Work, all studies, drawings, designs, and models prepared and
submitted under this Agreement shall be returned to the Artist and shall belong to the Artist.
1.8 INSURANCE
The Artist agrees to obtain, and maintain during the term of this agreement comprehensive
liability insurance in minimum amounts of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS
1,000,000) per occurrence to protect the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any
claims by any person for damage to persons or property arising out of or resulting from the
Artist's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall name the City OF
AUBURN as additionally insured. The policy shall require a minimum of thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the City of any cancellation or expiration of the policy or any modification of
any provisions of the policy. The Artist shall be required to provide a Certificate of Insurance
to the City prior to commencing performance under the terms of this Agreement.
1.9 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR/ASSIGNMENT
The parties agree and understand that the Artist is an independent contractor and not the
agent or employee of the City and that no liability shall attach to the City by reason of
entering into this Agreement except as otherwise provided herein. The parties agree that
this Agreement may not be assigned in whole or in part without the written consent of the
City.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE
2.1 FEE
The City shall pay the Artist for satisfactory completion of the artwork in the total fixed
amount of $85,000.00 (eighty-five thousand and no/100 U.S. Dollars) which shall constitute
full compensation for all services, engineering permits and materials to be performed and
furnished by the Artist under this Agreement except as noted under paragraph 2.4, Building
Construction Credits. All fees shall be paid in accordance with standard City business
practices. At each fee/fabrication Phase outlined above, the Artist will submit a brief written
report, which describes the progress to date, and invoice the City at that time.
2.2 PAYMENT
The first payment of 1/4 of $85,000. ($21,250.00) will be paid by the City to the Artist upon
signing this Agreement. The second payment of 1/4 of $85,000 ($21,250.00) will be paid by
the City to the Artist upon completion of and approval of final design drawings. The third
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 2 of 7DI.B Page 62 of 335
payment of 1/4of $85,000 ($21,250.00) will be paid by the City to the Artist upon completion
of fabrication. The final payment of the remaining 1/4 of $85,000 ($21,250.00) shall be
made to Artist no later than ten (10) days after the delivery and installation as specified in
this Agreement by Artist.
2.2 TAXES
The Artist is responsible for payment of all local, state, and federal taxes, which may be due
from the Work as a result of performance under this contract. Artist understand that taxes
are included in the agreed upon fee set forth in Article 2.1.
2.3 ARTIST EXPENSES
The Artist shall be responsible for the payment of all shipping charges, the costs of
transporting the Work to the Site, the costs of all travel by the Artist and the ArtisYs agents
and employees necessary for the proper performance of the senrices required under this
Agreement, and all other expenses related to the performance of this Agreement.
2.4 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CREDITS
If The Work provides a functional building construction element that replaces an element
previously budgeted by BLRB in the cost estimate dated 9/3/2008, then a"crediY' for the cost
of that replaced element will be considered by the City of Auburn Community Center
Committee as a potential credit.
ARTICLE 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1 DURATION
The services to be required of the Artist shall be completed in accordance with the schedule
for completion of the Center as established by BLRB Architects. Construction is anticipated
to begin in March 2009 and occupancy of the building is projected in April 2010.
ARTICLE 4. WARRANTIES
4.1 WARRANTIES OF TITLE
The Artist represents and warrants that: (a) the Work is solely the result of the Artistic effort of
the Artist; (b) except as otherwise disclosed in writing to the City, the Work is unique and
original and does not infringe upon any copyright; (c) the Work has not, or a duplicate thereof
has not, been accepted for sale elsewhere; and (d) the Work is free and clear of any liens from
any source whatever.
4.2 WARRANTIES OF QUALITY AND CONDITION
The Artist represents and warrants, except as otherwise disclosed to the City in writing and
in connection with submission of the Proposal, that the execution and fabrication of the Work
will be pertormed in a workmanlike manner; and the Work as fabricated and installed, will be
free of defects in material and workmanship; and reasonable maintenance of the Work will
not require procedures substantially in excess of those described in the maintenance
recommendations to be submitted by the Artist. The warranties described in this section
shall survive for a period of three (3) years after the final acceptance of the Work. The City
shall give notice to the Artist of any observed breach with reasonable promptness. The
Artist shall, at the request of the City, and at no cost to the City, cure reasonably and
promptly the breach of any such warranty which is curable by the Artist and which cure is
consistent with professional conservation standards.
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 3 of 7
DI.B Page 63 of 335
ARTICLE 5. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS
5.1 GENERAL
The Artist retains all rights under the Copyright Act of 1976 and all other rights in and to the
Work except ownership and possession and except as such rights are limited by this
Section. In view of the intention that the Work in its final dimension shall be unique, the
Artist shall not make any additional exact duplicate, three-dimensional reproductions of the
final Work nor shall the Artist grant permission to others to do so except with the written
permission of the City. The Artist grants to the City and its assigns an irrevocable license to
make representative photographic reproductions of the Work for non-commercial purposes,
including but not limited to reproductions used in brochures, media publicity, note cards, and
catalogues or other similar publications, provided that these rights are exercised in a manner
which depicts the integrity of the Work.
5.2 NOTICE
All reproductions by the City shall contain a credit to the Artist in the following form: "Title,"
year", "ArtisY".
5.3 CREDIT TO THE CITY
The Artist shall use her best efforts to give a credit reading substantially, "An original Work
owned and commissioned by the City of Auburn, Washington" in any public showing under
the Artist' control of the reproductions of the Work.
ARTICLE 6. ARTIST'S RIGHTS
6.1 IDENTIFICATION
The City will provide a plaque(s) to be delivered to the Artist prior to installation. The Artist
shall provide to the City, for review and approval, specified plaque dimensions six (6) weeks
prior to the installation. The plaque identifying the work as outlined in Article 5.2 shall be
installed by the City.
6.2 MAINTENANCE
The City recognizes that maintenance of the Work on a regular basis is essential to the
integrity of the Work. The City shall make reasonable efforts to assure that the Work is
properly maintained and protected, taking into account the instructions of the Artist provided
in the maintenance agreement and shall make reasonable efforts to protect and maintain the
Work against the ravages of time, vandalism, and the elements.
6.3 REPAIRS AND RESTORATION
The City shall have the right to determine when and if repairs and restorations to the Work
will be made. The Artist shall not unreasonably withhold approval for any repair or
restoration of the Work. If the Artist unreasonably fails to approve any repair or restoration,
the City shall have the right to make such repair or restoration.
6.4 DEACCESSIONING OF THE WORK
In the circumstance where a commissioned artwork is physically part of the building or
landscape and it is not an independent object(s) that can be safely removed, the City may
require the Artist to waive VARA (Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990) in regards only to the
destruction of the artwork. Prior to the destruction of the artwork, the City will attempt to
contact the Artist and secure the situation. In the event that the remodeling of the building or
landscape destroys part of the artwork, the City will de-access the artwork and, at the
request of the Artist, remove any attribution to the Artist. The City reserves the right to
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 4 of 7
DI.B Page 64 of 335
de-access artwork under the following conditions:
A.The Center or landscape is structurally or otherwise altered and can no longer
accommodate the Work,
B.The portion of the Center or landscape in which the Work is located is made publicly
inaccessible as a result of new construction, demolition, or security enhancement, or
has its surrounding environment altered in a way that significantly and adversely
impacts the Work.
C.The Center is sold or acquired by an entity other than City of Auburn.
D.There is a documented history of incident(s) that shows the Work is a threat to
public safety.
6.5 PERMANENT RECORD
The City shall maintain on permanent file a record of this Agreement and of the location and
disposition of the Work.
6.6 ARTIST ADDRESS
The Artist shall notify the City of changes in his/her address. The failure to do so within 30
days of said change, if such failure prevents the City from locating or notifying the Artist
where required under the terms of this Agreement, shall be deemed a waiver by the Artist of
the right subsequently to enforce those provisions of this Article 6 that require the express
approval of the Artist
ARTICLE 7. NON-DISCRIMINATION
The Artist shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances prohibiting
discrimination and employment with regard to age, sex, race, color, creed, national origin, or
physical, mental handicap.
ARTICLE 8. NOTICES
Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement may be personally served or given in writing
and shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if sent by registered or certified mail addressed to
the respective parties as follows:
Laurie Rose,Virginia Paquette
Cultural Arts Manager 5607 -16th Avenue NE
City of Auburn Seattle, WA 98105
Parks, Arts & Recreation Telephone: 206-524-6929
910 Ninth Street SE
Auburn, WA 98002
Telephone" 253-931-3043
Either party may, by like notice at any time, designate a different address to which notices shall be
sent. Notice in accordance with these provisions shall be deemed received when mailed.
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 5 of 7
DI.B Page 65 of 335
i
ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the other party
fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the
party terminating the Agreement.
In the event of default by the City, the City shall promptly compensate the Artist for all services
performed by the Artist prior to termination. In the event of default by the Artist, all finished and
unfinished drawings, sketches, photographs, models, and other work products under this Agreement
shall become the City's property. The City shall compensate the Artist for all work as performed prior
to termination. Notwithstanding, the Artist shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages
sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Artist and the City may
reasonably withhold payments to the Artist until such time as the exact amount of such damages due
the City from the Artist is determined.
ARTICLE 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS
10.1 ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and may not be
changed or modified nor any provision hereof waived except in writing agreed to by both
parties.
10.2 APPLICABLE LAW
This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted
in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action hereunder
shall be in King County, Washington. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with
any and all questions with respect hereto shall be determined by the laws of the State of
Washington.
10.3 COSTS TO PREVAILING PARTY
In the event of such litigation or other legal action, to enforce any rights, responsibilities or
obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing parties shall be entitled to receive its
reasonable costs and attorney's fees.
10.4 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS
In the pertormance of the Work, the Artist agrees to comply with all applicable state and local
laws, rules, and regulations.
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 6 of 7DI.B Page 66 of 335
4
V '
ITY O
tRN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vi
Daniel Heid, City Attor e
ARTIST
r.
VIRGINIA PAQUETTE
Tax 53 Y~
Resolution 4406 Exhibit A
Agreement for Artwork/Community Center
Page 7 of 7DI.B Page 67 of 335
DI.B Page 68 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6418
Date:
July 9, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6418
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Review Planning Commission's recommendation on amendments to Chapters 17.09 and 17.10 of Title 17
Land Adjustments and Divisions.
See attached.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C Page 69 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6418 Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6418.
Background Summary:
Over the past several years, the City made significant changes to the municipal code, specifically to Title
17, which addresses land adjustments. Now that these revised codes have been in place and applied to
various projects, staff has identified amendments that are needed to clarify regulations and amendments
related to recent changes in state law. The proposed code amendments also include changes related to
recent amendments in state law.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments on July 3, 2012 and
recommended approval to the City Council with no changes to the proposed amendments.
The Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the Planning Commission’s
recommendation at their July 9, 2012 and recommended approval to the full City Council with no changes
to the proposed amendments.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Backus Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012 Item Number:
DI.C Page 70 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 6
Findings of Fact
1. In general, the intent of the proposed zoning code amendments is to provide clarification
in the regulations, address recent changes in state law, and address comments received
from customer inquiries.
2. The process for zoning code text amendments is described in ACC Chapter 18.68.,
18.68.020 Initiation of amendments.
B. Text.
1. The city council, or planning and development committee of the city council, upon its
own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title; provided, that text amendments that are purely
administrative or procedural do not require a public hearing, nor do they require
preliminary review or recommendations of the planning commission;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
C. For the purposes of this chapter, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: “Substantive”
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development, what public infrastructure may be required of certain developments), and
“procedural” or “administrative” matters are those that relate to the process of how an
application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for applications and
appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must be submitted.
Essentially, “procedural” or “administrative” matters are the mechanical rules by which
substantive issues may be pursued). (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6198 § 3, 2008; Ord.
4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(46), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.030 Public hearing process.
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the
city council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
C. City Council Decision. The city council may affirm, modify or disaffirm any
recommendation of the planning commission or hearing examiner with regard to
amendments of the text or map of this title. (Ord. 6198 § 4, 2008; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996;
Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements.
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
DI.C Page 71 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 6
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting
the notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper
of general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in
three general public locations.
3. The process for amending Title 17, Land Adjustments and Divisions, is outlined in ACC
Section 17.02.090.
17.02.090 Amendments.
A. Initiation of Amendments.
1. The city council, or the planning and development committee of the city council, upon
its own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to
amend any portion or all of this title; provided, that no public hearing is required for a
purely administrative or procedural amendment of any portion of this title;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
B. Public Hearing and Notice.
1. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural amendments, the planning
director shall schedule a public hearing to be held before the planning commission for
any proposal to amend this title or to adopt or repeal any ordinance under the authority
established by Chapter 58.17 RCW. The director shall cause notice of such hearing to
be given as follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification a notice indicating the time and place of public hearing, describing the
general nature of the proposal, and indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or
amendment can be obtained; and
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area a notice indicating the
time and place of public hearing, describing the general nature of the proposal, and
indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or amendment may be obtained.
2. For all proposals to make purely administrative or procedural amendments to this title,
the planning director shall cause notice of such proposed amendment to be given as
follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification advance notice of the proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the
proposed amendment can be obtained.
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area advance notice of the
proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the proposed amendment can be
obtained.
3. For the purposes of this section, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: substantive
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development), and procedural or administrative matters are those that relate to the
process of how an application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for
applications and appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must
DI.C Page 72 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 6
be submitted. Essentially, procedural or administrative matters are the mechanical rules
by which substantive issues may be pursued).
C. Planning Commission Recommendation. After the public hearing has been closed,
the planning commission shall recommend to the council either adoption, adoption with
modifications, or rejection of the proposed ordinance or amendment. In formulating its
recommendation, the commission shall consider, among other things, the relationship
between the proposed ordinance or amendment and the comprehensive plan, other
applicable city policies, and other existing land use controls.
D. City Council Action. The planning director shall forward the planning commission’s
recommendation, in writing, to the council. The council may elect to hold its own public
hearing, either before the full council or before a council committee, in which case the
city clerk shall cause adequate notice to be given. The council shall consider, but shall
not be bound by, the planning commission’s recommendation in reaching its own
decision. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009.)
4. The proposed code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive
Plan as identified in the conclusion section of this staff report.
5. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed amendments on June
13, 2012. The 14-day comment period ends on June 27, 2012. The appeal periods
ends on July 11, 2012.
6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state
agencies as required for the 60-day state review required for modification of
development regulations. The amendments were sent on June 13, 2012 and expedited
review was requested. The Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on June
14, 2012. Expedited has not been granted as of the writing of this staff report. If the
request is denied then the standard 60-days applies from the submittal date of June 13,
2012.
7. Staff presented the draft code language to the Planning Commission on June 5, 2012 for
review and discussion.
8. Two comments on the proposed amendments were received; one from the Auburn
School District and the second from the Federal Way School District.
9. The public hearing notice was published on June 20, 2012 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3, 2012.
10. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 3, 2012 with no public testimony
on the proposed code amendments. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed code amendments as presented by staff.
11. The Planning and Community Development reviewed the proposed code amendments
at their July 9, 2012 meeting and recommended approval to the full City Council with no
changes to the proposed amendments.
DI.C Page 73 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 6
12. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 17, Land
Adjustments and Divisions, Title 18, Zoning, and Title 19, Impact Fees scheduled for
City Council action on July 16, 2012.
Conclusions
1. Pursuant to ACC Section 18.68.020 and 17.02.090, amendments of Titles 17 and 18
require a public hearing before the Planning Commission with a public hearing notice
published at least 10-days prior to the public hearing date.
Comment:
The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times on June 20, 2012 which is
at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3,
2012. The public hearing notice was also posted on the City’s website.
2. These code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan as
follows:
GP-3: The Planning Department will develop an annual work program that includes
work elements directed toward studying basic community needs, policy development,
and code administration.
LU-44: Home occupations in residential neighborhoods shall be permitted only if they
comply with performance standards that ensure compatibility with adjacent residential
uses.
Chapter 5 – Capital Facilities
Comment:
The proposed code amendments comply with the above comprehensive plan polices or
chapters. The Planning Department has set up an annual program where staff
documents potential amendments to the municipal code that have identified through use
of the code on project applications, results of customer inquiries, or to address changes
at the state level.
One of the proposed amendments addresses the Home Occupation regulations
(Chapter 18.64) specifically, home occupations operating on federal holidays. Staff
received a customer inquiry questioning why home occupations could not operate on
federal holidays when other businesses could operate. Allowing a home occupation
business to operate on federal holidays is not incompatible with residential uses. The
home occupation regulations would still limit the number of vehicle trips to the business.
The proposed amendment to Title 19, Impact Fees, revises when school districts are to
submit their request for an impact fee increase. When the City processes the school
district capital facilities plan (CFP) we also want to know if a school impact fee increase
is being requested so that increase can be reviewed concurrently with the CFP.
Annually the City adopts by reference the four school district CFPs.
DI.C Page 74 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6418 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 6 of 6
The remaining code amendments modify when the deadline for final short plat and final
plat submittals to be consistent with recent changes in state law, clarify regulations that
were part of the Phase 1 code update work, and remove from the Downtown Urban
Center zoning district chapter the review by the Downtown Redevelopment Committee
as that council committee no longer exists.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval as presented by staff.
DI.C Page 75 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 1 of 20
ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 1 8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 17.09 AND 17.10 WITHIN TITLE 17
LAND ADJUSTMENTS AND DIVISIONS OF THE
AUBURN CITY CODE
WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn
subidivision code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current
development needs and standards of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted significant changes to its subdivision title in
2009 and there are housekeeping amendments needed to clarify those
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the state legislature recently passed changes to RCW
58.17.140 related to the filing of final plats and the City is modifying its
regulations accordingly; and
WHEREAS, following proper public notice, the Planning Commission
considered the proposed code amendments at a public hearing on July 3, 2012;
and
WHEREAS, after fully considering the testimony and information
presented at the public hearing, on July 3, 2012, the Planning Commission made
its recommendations on the code amendments to the City of Auburn City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee
reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendation at their July 9, 2012
meeting and forwarded their recommendation to the City Council; and
DI.C Page 76 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 20
WHEREAS, the environmental review on the proposal has been
completed in accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) with a final Determination of Non-significance (DNS) issued June 13,
2012; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code
amendments were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required with
expedited review requested and acknowledgment received on June 14, 2012;
and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code
amendments have been received from the Department of Commerce or other
state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds that the proposed amendments
provide clarification to the subdivision title and comply with recent changes to
state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.09.035 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.09.035 Survey requirements.
A. A licensed professional land surveyor licensed in the state of
Washington shall complete all lot staking pursuant to RCW 58.09.040(1) prior to
the recording of the short subdivision.
DI.C Page 77 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 20
B. All lot corners, including interior lot corners, shall be marked with a
permanent marker that bears the land surveyor’s registration number. When the
boundary lines follow a meandering line, the “corners” shall be set as directed by
the city of Auburn.
C. When the legal description of the short subdivision utilizes partial or
complete section subdivisional breakdown to establish the boundaries, section
subdivision survey information shall be shown in accordance with the
requirements of WAC 332-130-030.
D. All reference monuments used in the establishment of the short
subdivision corners shall be identified, described and noted as set or found.
When appropriate, the survey shall reference previous surveys that served as the
basis for the survey.
E. When the short subdivision is adjacent to a constructed public right-of-
way and the plat corners or its offset represent a quarter corner, section corner or
donation land claim that is not of record or has been lost (or obliterated), a
standard monument shall be placed.
F. Whenever a short subdivision is adjacent to existing right-of-way, the
centerline of the right-of-way shall be located on the plat drawing. If the
constructed improvements fall outside of the documented right-of-way, the
surveyor shall identify the existing edge of the pavement and limits of the
maintained right-of-way section on the drawing and show its relationship to said
centerline.
G. All requirements of Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC
governing minimum standards for land boundary surveys shall be met and a note
shall be placed that reads:
THIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH ALL THE STANDARDS AND
GUIDELINES OF THE “SURVEY RECORDING ACT” CHAPTER
58.09 RCW AND WAC 332-130.
H. The side lot lines of each lot, which if extended would intersect with the
curb, shall be marked on the curb. (Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6006 § 3, 2006.
Formerly 17.14.035)
Section 2. That section 17.09.050 of the Auburn City Code be and the
same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.09.050 Development requirements.
A. Lot Area and Dimensions. Each lot created by short subdivision shall
contain sufficient square footage and lot dimensions to meet the requirements of
ACC Title 18. Each lot to be served by an on-site sewage disposal system shall
be a minimum of 15,000 square feet in area and shall also meet the minimum lot
area requirements of the county department of health rules and regulations. Land
DI.C Page 78 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 20
contained in access easements, tracts or panhandles shall not be included in lot
area or lot dimension calculations for the purposes of this section.
B. Every lot within a short subdivision shall be capable of being
reasonably served by public or private sewage disposal, water, storm drainage
facilities and streets. The city will not approve a short subdivision for which a
building permit cannot be issued because of insufficient infrastructure.
C. Conformance with Adopted Plans. Street, water, sewer and storm
drainage facilities adjacent to or within the short subdivision shall be in
conformance with adopted city ordinances, standards and policies. Easements
for utilities recommended by such plans shall be provided to the city, with the
exact location of such easements to be determined by the city engineer.
D. Floods, Flood Control and Storm Drainage.
1. Where any portion of the proposed short subdivision lies within an
area of special flood hazard or regulatory floodway, conformance with
adopted city flood hazard area ordinances, standards and policies shall be
required.
2. A conceptual storm drainage/site grading plan shall be required to
be submitted, as part of the short subdivision application, unless waived by
the city engineer.
3. The proposed subdivision should have one or more new lots in the
regulatory floodplain set aside for open space use through deed restriction,
easement, subdivision covenant, or donation to a public agency. The
density of the development in the portion of the development outside the
regulatory floodplain may be increased in accordance with applicable land
use and subdivision regulations.
4. If a parcel has a buildable site outside the regulatory floodplain, it
shall not be subdivided to create a new lot, tract, or parcel within a binding
site plan that does not have a buildable site outside the regulatory
floodplain. This provision does not apply to lots set aside from development
and preserved as open space.
E. Adjacent Streets. When any public street lying adjacent to the property
being short subdivided has insufficient width or for any other reason does not
conform to minimum street standards, in accordance with the city design and
construction standards, sufficient additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the
city and appropriate improvements shall be made by the subdivider to conform
the abutting half of the street to such standards consistent with Chapter 12.64A
ACC. Deferral of such improvement requirements shall be in conformance with
the city of Auburn design and construction standards.
F. Access.
1. All short subdivisions shall border on an opened, constructed and
maintained public street. All lots within a short subdivision shall either
border on an opened, constructed and maintained public street or shall be
served by a private street, access easement, tract or panhandle having
DI.C Page 79 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 20
direct access to such a public street. Where private streets and access
easements are provided, they shall be improved or guaranteed to the city of
Auburn and be in conformance with the city of Auburn design and
construction standards.
2. All private streets, access easements and panhandles shall be
capable of meeting the fire access requirements of Chapter 15.36A ACC
and the development standards of Chapters 17.14 and 18.31 ACC, in
addition to any other requirements of this title, including, but not limited to,
an adequate surface for access and minimum turnaround requirements on
dead-end streets or access easements as specified by the fire department.
3. All proposals shall ensure that all buildable lots shall have at least one
access road connected to land outside the regulatory floodplain with the
surface of the road at or above the FPE.
G. Dedication of Streets. Dedication of a public street or streets may be
required, whenever the city engineer finds that one or more of the following
conditions applies:
1. The general alignment of a proposed private street, access easement
or panhandle follows the general alignment of a future arterial as shown in
the comprehensive plan; or
2. The general alignment of a proposed private street, access easement
or panhandle can be reasonably modified to provide a desirable through-
connection between two or more existing or planned public streets or
arterials; or
3. A public street would be necessary to provide adequate access to
adjacent property not subject to the proposed short subdivision.
H. Non-motorized Requirements. In addition to any frontage improvement
requirements and compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Transportation
Plan, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions
for students who walk to and from school shall be considered.
HI. Fire Hydrants. All lots within a short subdivision shall be capable of
being served by a fire hydrant as required by Chapter 13.16 ACC. Property
zoned RC, residential conservancy, may be exempt, provided the requirements
of ACC 13.16.030 are met.
IJ. The final recorded subdivision plat shall include a notice that part of the
property is in the SFHA, riparian habitat zone and/or channel migration area, as
appropriate. (Ord. 6295 § 6, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6186 § 12, 2008;
Ord. 6006 § 3, 2006. Formerly 17.14.055).
Section 3. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.09.070 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
DI.C Page 80 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 6 of 20
17.09.070 Final short subdivision approval.
A. Timeframe for Final Short Subdivision Approval. A final short
subdivision meeting all requirements of this title and the conditions and
requirements of the written decision granting preliminary short subdivision
approval shall be submitted to the Auburn planning and development department
within five years of the date of preliminary short subdivision approvalthe
timeframes specified in ACC 17.09.110, unless otherwise extended by the
director or designee.
B. Procedures. Final short subdivision applications shall be processed as
a Type II land use action.
C. Application. An application for final short subdivision approval meeting
all requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW and this title shall be submitted to the
department of planning and development accompanied by the following:
1. Application materials consistent with the requirements of ACC
17.02.065.
2. A copy of the approved preliminary short subdivision.
3. A final short subdivision drawing meeting the requirements of Chapter
58.17 RCW, including certifications, dedications, and title reports;
4. Agency recommendations pursuant to RCW 58.17.150;
5. A recordable survey and surveyor’s signature meeting the
requirements of Chapter 58.09 RCW and RCW 58.17.250. The map and
legal descriptions included in the application for final short subdivision shall
be prepared and certified by a professional land surveyor licensed in the
state of Washington in a format acceptable to the city of Auburn and the
Survey Recording Act.
6. A title insurance report, not older than 30 days prior to the date of
application, confirming that the title of the land in the proposed subdivision
is vested in the name of the owners whose signatures appear on the final
short subdivision’s certificate.
7. Computation data for all lots, streets and easements located within the
plat.
8. Failure of an applicant to submit all required application materials shall
be considered a lack of compliance with this section, and the director or
designee may withhold the application from further consideration until such
time as the application is complete.
9. Declaration blocks shall be provided for the original tract owner,
surveyor, approving governmental agencies, and recording certification, in a
manner as prescribed by the director.
10. Proof of the date of last legal segregation of the parcel of land to be
short subdivided, if deemed necessary by the planning director.
11. Copy of restrictions, if any, to be imposed upon the use of the land.
Such restrictions must be recorded simultaneously with the short
subdivision.
DI.C Page 81 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 7 of 20
12. In any short subdivision where lots are served or to be served by a
private road, the subdivider shall furnish a copy of such further covenants or
documents that will result in:
a. Each lot owner having access thereto and having responsibility for
maintenance of any private road contained within the short subdivision
in such a condition as to allow free access for emergency vehicles;
b. Such covenants or documents shall obligate any seller to give actual
notice to any prospective purchaser of the method of maintenance of
the private road, which notice shall be caused to be included in any
deeds or contracts relating to such sale and such covenants or
documents shall be recorded simultaneously with the short subdivision.
D. Preparation. The final short subdivision shall be prepared by a
professional land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington. The preparer
shall, by placing his or her signature and stamp upon the face of the final short
subdivision, certify that the final short subdivision is a true and correct
representation of the land actually surveyed by the preparer, that the existing
monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and
geodetic details are correct.
E. Scale and Format. The final plat shall be drawn with reproducible ink on
Mylar measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, with a one-inch border on one
edge and a one-half-inch border for the other three edges for projects in King
County and measuring 18 inches by 24 inches with a two-inch border on the left
edge and a one-half-inch border for the other three edges for projects in Pierce
County. The final short subdivision shall be accurate, legible and drawn to an
engineering (decimal) scale of 100 feet or fewer to the inch. If more than one
sheet is required, an index sheet showing the entire subdivision with street and
highway names and block numbers (if any) shall be provided. Each sheet,
including the index sheet, shall be of the above-specified size. All signatures or
certifications appearing on a final short subdivision shall be in reproducible black
ink.
F. Final Short Subdivision Contents. A final short subdivision drawing shall
contain the following information:
1. The name of the short subdivision, if applicable;
2. Legal description of the property being subdivided;
3. Numeric scale, graphic scale, basis of bearings and date of
preparation of the final short subdivision;
4. The boundary line of the short subdivision, referenced to city datum in
accordance with city design and construction standards and based on an
accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings;
5. The exact location, width and assigned name of all streets, alleys and
other public ways within and adjacent to the short subdivision;
6. A table depicting the assigned address for each lot within the short
subdivision;
DI.C Page 82 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 8 of 20
7. The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and
dedications for rights-of-way provided for public and private services and
utilities;
8. True courses and distances to the nearest established street lines, or
section or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate
the short subdivision;
9. Municipal, township, county or section lines accurately tied to the lines
of the plat by distances and courses;
10. All lot and block numbers and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet
and hundredths of feet;
11. The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and
lengths of all arcs;
12. The accurate location of each permanent control monument. One
such monument shall be located at each and every controlling corner on the
boundaries of the parcel of land being subdivided; at each street centerline
intersection, each point of curvature (PC), each point of tangency (PT), and
each point of reverse curve (PRC); and at each intersection of a street
centerline with a plat boundary;
13. All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall
be established above, but not farther than 20 feet from, the high water line
of such body;
14. Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated
or reserved for public use, with the purposes of such dedication or
reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in the dedication;
15. Accurate outlines of any areas to be reserved by deed covenant for
common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the
purposes of such reservation;
16. Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the short
subdivision, as required by the director, or at the discretion of the property
owner;
17. A signed certification stating that the short subdivision has been
made with the free consent, and in accordance with the desires, of the
owner or owners. If the short subdivision includes a dedication, the
certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all
streets and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, religious
society or societies, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the
plat, and a waiver of all claims for damages against any governmental
authority which may be occasioned to the adjacent land by the established
construction, drainage or maintenance of said street or other areas so
dedicated. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged
before a notary public by all parties having any interest in the lands
subdivided. An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct
access to any street from any property. Such waiver may be required by the
DI.C Page 83 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 9 of 20
city engineer as a condition of approval. Roads not dedicated to the public
must be clearly marked on the face of the plat. Any dedication, donation or
grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim
deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the
donation or grant. At the discretion of the city engineer, conveyances of
right-of-way may be required to be by statutory warranty deed. The
acceptance of right-of-way by the city shall not obligate the city to improve
or develop the lands in the right-of-way;
18. Forms for the appropriate certifications of the city engineer and
planning director, as follows:
CITY ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that this short plat is in compliance with the
certificate of improvements issued pursuant to ACC 17.14.015, and is
consistent with all applicable City improvement standards and
requirements in force on the date of preliminary short plat approval,
this ______ day of _____________, 20___.
______________________________
Auburn City Engineer
PLANNING DIRECTOR’S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify on this ______ day of ______________, 20____,
that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary
plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary short plat
was approved on the ______ day of ______________, 20____,
1920. A form for the approval of the applicable county (King/Pierce)
assessor, as follows or as required by the applicable county, if different:
ASSESSOR’S APPROVAL
Examined and approved this ______ day of ______________,
20___.
______________________________
County Assessor
______________________________
Deputy County Assessor
____________________________
Account number
210. A form for the certificate of the applicable county recorder
(King/Pierce), as follows or as required by the applicable county, if different:
RECORDING CERTIFICATE
Filed for record at the request of the City of Auburn this ______ day
of ____________, 20___ at _____ minutes past ______ __.M., and
recorded in Volume _____ of Plats, page ________ Records of (King
or Pierce) County, Washington.
County Recording Number _____.
______________________________
DI.C Page 84 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 10 of 20
Manager
______________________________
Superintendent of Records
221. Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of
the city engineer or planning director.
G. Decision-Making Criteria for Final Short Subdivision Approval. The
following criteria shall be used by the director or designee in consideration of final
short subdivision approval:
1. Whether conditions imposed when the preliminary short subdivision
was approved have been met;
2. The completion of the required improvements or their financial
guarantee in conformance with Chapter 17.14 ACC;
3. Whether the final short subdivision is in conformance with the city’s
zoning regulations and all other applicable land use regulations;
4. The director or designee shall not approve a final short subdivision
until he or she determines that it conforms to the approved preliminary short
subdivision and any conditions and restrictions imposed at time of
preliminary approval. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009.)
Section 4. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.09.110 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.09.110 Time limitations.
A. Preliminary approvals for short subdivisions shall be valid for a period
of five seven years following the date of the notice of final decision if the date of
the preliminary short plat approval is on or before December 31, 2014, and within
five years of the date of preliminary short plat approval if the preliminary short
plat approval is on or after January 1, 2015.; provided, that for any preliminary
approval in effect on June 10, 2010, through December 31, 2014, the approvals
shall be for a period of seven years following the date of the notice.
B. If the preliminary short plat approval is on or before December 31,
2007 then the final short plat shall be submitted to the City for approval within
nine years of the date of preliminary short plat approval and not subject to
requirements adopted under RCW 90.58.
CB. Extensions. The director or designee may administratively authorize
through a Type I land use action extensions to preliminary short subdivision
approvals. For purposes of this section, the authority to issue extensions shall
apply to preliminary short subdivision approvals previously issued by the city.
Extensions shall be issued in one-year increments up to a maximum of three
years, subject to the following criteria and conditions:
DI.C Page 85 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 11 of 20
1. An applicant for an extension shall make a written request for the
extension a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to expiration of the
preliminary short subdivision approval.
2. The director or designee shall in consideration of granting an
extension find:
a. There have not been any substantial changes in the laws governing
the development of the short subdivision, with which lack of compliance
would be contrary to the public health, safety and welfare; or
b. The applicant has pursued final platting in good faith. Good faith
shall be evidenced by progress on final surveying, engineering,
construction or bonding of improvements; or
c. There have been substantial changes in economic conditions and
market forces that have substantively limited the ability of the applicant
to pursue final platting.
3. A condition of any extension approval shall be that the subject short
subdivision shall comply with state or federal mandates required of the city
and/or life, health and safety requirements of the city in effect at the time of
any extension approval.
DC. At the same time the director or designee is considering the extension,
he or she may add conditions or requirements upon factual determination that
the addition of conditions or requirements will benefit the public health, safety
and welfare.
DE. A short subdivision granted preliminary approval, but not filed for final
plat approval within the applicable time period or extended time period, shall be
void. (Ord. 6317 § 1, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009.).
Section 5. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.10.020 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.020 Application, submittal and contents.
A. Application. In addition to the requirements for a completed application
as provided in ACC Title 14, an application for subdivision approval shall include:
1. Application requirements found in ACC 17.02.065;
2. A preliminary plat meeting the requirements of RCW 58.17.160 for a
preliminary subdivision;
3. A neighborhood circulation plan meeting the requirements of Chapter
17.16 ACC and RCW 58.17.110(2) for safe walking paths for students;
4. Where any lot is proposed to be served by an on-site sewage disposal
system, results of preliminary percolation tests for each such proposed lot,
conducted under the county department of health rules and regulations;
DI.C Page 86 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 12 of 20
5. A conceptual utility/site grading plan and/or methodology prepared in
accordance with the city’s comprehensive plans, standards or ordinance
requirements. The conceptual utility/site grading plan shall include adequate
horizontal and vertical information to ensure that utilities can be constructed
consistent with the preliminary plat layout;
6. The location of other utilities other than those provided by the city;
7. The application shall include a transportation site plan for streets,
pedestrian, and bike facilities. The site plan shall include adequate
horizontal and vertical information to ensure the transportation facilities can
be constructed consistent with the preliminary plat layout;
8. A title report, with liability for errors not to exceed the assessed value
of the lots on the date of application. The title report shall be issued no more
than 30 days prior to the application date;
9. Copy of restrictions, if any, to be imposed upon the use of the land.
Such restrictions must be recorded simultaneously with the subdivision.
B. Preparation. The preliminary plat or short plat shall be prepared by a
professional engineer or professional land surveyor registered or licensed by the
state of Washington. The preparer shall, by placing his or her signature and
stamp upon the face of the plat, certify that all information is portrayed accurately
and that the proposed subdivision or short subdivision complies with the
standards and requirements of this title, the Auburn zoning ordinance and any
other applicable land use and development controls.
C. Scale and Format. The preliminary plat shall be drawn with reproducible
black ink on Mylar. All geographic information portrayed by the preliminary plat
shall be accurate, legible, and drawn to an engineering (decimal) scale.
D. Preliminary Plat Contents. A preliminary plat shall provide the following
information:
1. General Information. The following information shall appear on each
sheet of a preliminary plat or short plat:
a. The name of the proposed subdivision, together with the words
“preliminary plat”;
b. The name and address of the applicant;
c. The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional
engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary
plat or short plat;
d. Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of
preparation;
e. A form for the endorsement of the planning director, as follows:
APPROVED BY RESOLUTION _____ OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ON (Date) ________
_________________________________
Director, Planning and Development Dept.
________
DI.C Page 87 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 13 of 20
Date
f. Legal description of preliminary plat.
2. Existing Geographic Features. Existing geographic features, as
detailed in city application requirements, shall be drawn lightly in relation to
proposed geographic features.
3. Proposed Geographic Features. Proposed geographic features, as
detailed in city application requirements, shall be shown.
4. Additional Information. The following additional information shall be
shown on the face of the preliminary plat:
a. For proposed subdivisions involving residential land uses, a table
providing the following information for each distinct residential area:
i. Proposed land use (e.g., single-family, duplex, multifamily);
ii. Number of dwelling units;
iii. Gross acreage;
iv. Existing zoning designation;
v. Proposed zoning designation;
vi. Approximate area of smallest lot;
b. Proposed source of domestic water supply;
c. Proposed sewage disposal system;
d. Typical street cross section(s);
e. Proposed storm drainage system;
f. For preliminary plats that are related to a planned unit development
(PUD), the following information shall also be provided:
i. The ordinance and contract of the PUD rezone if previously
done;
ii. The location of perimeter walls and fences on the boundary of
the PUD and an indication of the height and materials;
iii. The location and size of any entrance signs;
iv. A landscaping plan;
v. Any covenants not previously approved. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010;
Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 5170 § 1, 1998; Ord. 5140 § 1, 1998;
Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.020)
Section 6. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.10.050 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.050 Hearing examiner review of preliminary plats.
A. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.66 ACC, the hearing examiner
shall within 104 calendar days of the closure of the public hearing approve, deny,
or approve with conditions the preliminary plat. The hearing examiner shall not
recommend approval of the preliminary plat unless he finds the proposed
DI.C Page 88 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 14 of 20
subdivision is in conformance with the findings of fact as outlined in ACC
17.10.070.
B. Pursuant to the provisions of ACC 18.66.150, the planning director or
any interested party affected by the recommendation of the examiner who
asserts that the hearing examiner based that recommendation on an erroneous
procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new
evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make
a written request for review by the examiner within seven calendar days after the
written decision of the examiner has been rendered. The request for
reconsideration shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant,
and the examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as the
examiner deems proper. The examiner may request further information which
shall be provided within 104 calendar days of the examiner’s request. The
examiner’s written decision on the request for consideration shall be transmitted
to all parties of record within 104 calendar days of receipt of the request for
reconsideration or receipt of the additional information requested, whichever is
later. (Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6186 § 4, 2008; Ord. 5140 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4840
§ 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.050.)
Section 7. Amendment to City Code. That section 17.10.070 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.0670 Findings of fact.
Preliminary plats shall only be approved if findings of fact are drawn to support
the following:
A. Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general
welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways,
water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds and schools;
B. Conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of
the comprehensive plan;
C. Conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of
any other applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the city
council;
D. Conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of
this title, as enumerated in ACC 17.02.030;
E. Conformance of the proposed subdivision to the Auburn zoning
ordinance and any other applicable planning or engineering standards and
specifications as adopted by the city, or as modified and approved as part of a
previously approved PUD;
DI.C Page 89 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 15 of 20
F. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed subdivision are
mitigated such that the preliminary plat will not have an unacceptable adverse
effect upon the quality of the environment;
G. Adequate provisions are made so the preliminary plat will prevent or
abate public nuisances. (Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 5140 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4840 §
1, 1996; Ord. 4772 § 1, 1995; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.070)
Section 8. Amendment to City Code. That Section 17.10.080 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.0780 Notice of decision to applicant.
Following the decision of the hearing examiner approving or rejecting a
preliminary plat, the director shall notify the applicant of the decision. The notice
shall be accompanied by a copy of the decision. If the decision is for approval or
approval with conditions, the notice shall advise the applicant to prepare an
improvement method report, as described by Chapter 17.14 ACC, and shall
inform the applicant regarding the applicable time limitations on final plat
submittal. This notice of decision is in addition to any notice of decision required
under ACC Title 14. (Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6186 § 5, 2008; Ord. 5140 § 1,
1998; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.080.)
Section 9. Amendment to City Code. That Section 17.10.090 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.0890 Transfer of property.
If performance of an offer or agreement to sell, lease, or otherwise transfer
a lot, tract or parcel of land, following preliminary plat approval but prior to final
plat approval, is expressly conditioned on the recording of the final plat
containing the lot, tract or parcel under this chapter, the offer or agreement does
not violate any provision of this chapter. All payments on account of an offer or
agreement conditioned as provided in this section shall be deposited in an
escrow or other regulated trust account and no disbursement to sellers shall be
permitted until the final plat is recorded. (Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 5140 § 1,
1998; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.090.)
Section 10. Amendment to City Code. That Section 17.10.100 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
DI.C Page 90 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 16 of 20
17.10.9100 Adjustments of an approved preliminary plat.
A. Minor Adjustments. Minor adjustments may be made and approved by
the planning director. Minor adjustments are those which may affect the precise
dimensions of the plat but which do not affect the basic character or arrangement
of the lots and streets. Such dimensional requirements shall not vary more than
10 percent from the original. The adjustments cannot be inconsistent with the
requirements of the preliminary plat approval. The adjustments cannot cause the
subdivision to be in violation of this title, the zoning ordinance, any other
applicable city land use control, Chapter 58.17 RCW, or any other applicable
state law or regulation. Minor adjustments shall be reviewed for consistency with
this chapter and the regulations of this title, as well as the following criteria:
1. The adjustment maintains the design intent or purpose of the original
approval; and
2. The adjustment maintains the quality of design or product established
by the original approval; and
3. The adjustment does not cause a significant environmental or land use
impact on or beyond the site; and
4. The adjustment is not precluded by the terms of this title or by state law
from being decided administratively; and
5. Circumstances render it impractical, unfeasible or detrimental to the
public interest to accomplish the subject condition or requirement of
preliminary plat or short plat approval.
B. Major Adjustments. Major adjustments are those that, when determined
by the planning director, substantially change the basic design, layout, open
space or other requirements of the plat. When the planning director determines a
change constitutes a major adjustment, a new application for a preliminary plat is
required and shall be processed as a new and separate application. (Ord. 6239
§ 1, 2009; Ord. 5140 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988.
Formerly 17.06.100.)
Section 11. Amendment to City Code. That Section 17.10.110 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.1010 Time limitations.
A. Preliminary approvals for subdivisions shall be valid for a period of five seven
years following the date of the notice of final decision if the date of the preliminary plat
approval is on or before December 31, 2014, and within five years of the date of
preliminary plat approval if the preliminary plat approval is on or after January 1, 2015.
B. If the preliminary short plat approval is on or before December 31,
2007 then the final plat shall be submitted to the City for approval within nine
years of the date of preliminary plat approval and not subject to requirements
DI.C Page 91 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 17 of 20
adopted under RCW 90.58.; provided, that for any notice of final decision in
effect on June 10, 2010, through December 31, 2014, the approvals shall be for
a period of seven years following the date of the notice.
CB. Extensions. The director or designee may administratively authorize
through a Type I land use action extensions to preliminary plat approvals. For
purposes of this section, the authority to issue extensions shall apply to
preliminary plat approvals previously issued by the city. Extensions shall be
issued in one-year increments up to a maximum of three years, subject to the
following criteria and conditions:
1. An applicant for an extension shall make a written request for the
extension a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to expiration of the
preliminary plat approval.
2. The director or designee shall in consideration of granting an
extension find:
a. There have not been any substantial changes in the laws
governing the development of the plat, with which lack of compliance
would be contrary to the public health, safety and welfare; or
b. The applicant has pursued final platting diligently, as evidenced
by progress on final surveying, engineering, construction or the
financial security of improvements; or
c. There have been substantial changes in economic conditions
and market forces that have substantively limited the ability of the
applicant to pursue final platting.
3. A condition of any extension approval shall be that the subdivision
shall comply with state or federal mandates required of the city and/or life,
health and safety requirements of the city in effect at the time of any
extension approval.
C. At the same time the director or designee is considering the extension,
he or she may add conditions or requirements upon factual determination that
the addition of conditions or requirements will benefit the public health, safety
and welfare.
D. A plat granted preliminary approval, but not filed for final plat approval
within the applicable time period or extended time period, shall be null and void.
(Ord. 6317 § 3, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6186 § 6, 2008; Ord. 5140 § 1,
1998; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4296 § 2, 1988. Formerly 17.06.110.)
Section 12. Amendment to City Code. That Section 17.10.120 of
the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
17.10.1120 Development standards for panhandle lot access and private access
tracts.
A. Panhandle Lot Access.
DI.C Page 92 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 18 of 20
1. The maximum length of a panhandle lot access within the R-5,
R-7, R-10, R-16, R-20, and RO zones and residential PUDs shall be 150
feet. When there are unique physical limitations of the property including
but not limited to steep slopes, significant vegetation, or sensitive
environmental areas that would be impacted less if a longer panhandle
length were provided, then the planning director may allow additional
length. The planning director may also allow for additional length if there
is an existing intervening parcel of the property (that has a lot depth
greater than 150 feet) between the proposed panhandle lot and the
abutting street. There shall be no limitation of length within the other
zoning districts of the city.
2. All residential and nonresidential panhandle accesses shall meet
the standards of the city of Auburn engineering, design and construction
standards manual.
3. If two panhandle accesses within the same plat abut each other,
then one common paved driveway, spanning both panhandles, may be
provided as part of the two panhandles. The pavement width of the
driveway shall be determined using the same methodology as subsection
(A)(2) of this section.
4. Not more than two panhandle accesses within the same plat may
abut each other. Alternatively, a separate access tract shall be required in
lieu of more than two separate panhandle accesses. The separate access
tract shall meet the requirements of subsection B of this section.
B. Private Access Tracts and/or Easements.
1. Private access tracts and/or easements will be allowed when it is
physically impractical to provide a lot with direct access to a public street
due to unique physical limitations of the property, including but not limited
to steep slopes, significant vegetation, or sensitive environmental areas. If
the lot abuts an arterial, an access tract may also be allowed to provide
an alternate access to the lot if it is impractical to provide for another
public street due to the aforementioned physical limitations. The use of
access tracts cannot preclude or hinder the alignment of future public
streets that would otherwise serve the area.
2. Access tracts can only be created through a plat process
pursuant to Chapter 17.09 ACC and this chapter. Ownership and
maintenance responsibilities will also be determined as part of the plat
process.
3. The maximum number of lots to be served by one access tract
shall be six. If a lot abuts an access tract and a public street, then the
front lot line shall be oriented to the public.
4. All access tracts and/or easements must connect to a public
street and the maximum length shall be 150 feet as measured from the
edge of the public street right-of-way. Additional length may be allowed if
DI.C Page 93 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 19 of 20
the unique physical limitations of the property including but not limited to
steep slopes, significant vegetation, or sensitive environmental areas
would be impacted less if additional length were provided. The access
tract shall not allow for through vehicle access.
5. Private access tracts and/or easements shall meet city of Auburn
design and construction standards.
C. Emergency Access Provisions. Irrespective of the requirements of this
section, additional provisions may be required if needed to provide for adequate
emergency access as determined by the Auburn fire marshal. The additional
provisions may include but not be limited to providing for turnarounds, additional
access tract width, fire hydrants or sprinklering of the building. (Ord. 6239 § 1,
2009.)
Section 13. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directions of this legislation.
Section 14. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances.
Section 15. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law.
INTRODUCED: __________________
PASSED: _______________________
APPROVED: ____________________
DI.C Page 94 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6418
July 10, 2012
Page 20 of 20
CITY OF AUBURN
______________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Published: _________________
DI.C Page 95 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6419
Date:
July 9, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6419
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Review Planning Commission's recommendations on amendments to Title 18, Zoning, related to the
Downtown Urban Center Zone, Supplemental Development Standards, Parking, and Home Occupations.
See attached agenda bill.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 96 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6419 Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6419.
Background Summary:
Over the past several years, the City made significant changes to the municipal code, specifically to the
zoning code, including changes to the parking chapter, landscaping chapter, and supplemental
development standards. Now that these revised codes have been in place and applied to various
projects, staff has identified amendments that are needed to clarify regulations. The proposed code
amendments address changes to the Downtown Urban Center zone, the Supplemental Development
Standards, Home Occupations, and Parking.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments on July 3, 2012 and
recommended approval to the City Council with no changes to the proposed amendments.
The Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the Planning Commission’s
recommendation at their July 9, 2012 and recommended approval to the full City Council with no changes
to the proposed amendments.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Backus Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012 Item Number:
DI.D Page 97 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 6
Findings of Fact
1. In general, the intent of the proposed zoning code amendments is to provide clarification
in the regulations, address recent changes in state law, and address comments received
from customer inquiries.
2. The process for zoning code text amendments is described in ACC Chapter 18.68.,
18.68.020 Initiation of amendments.
B. Text.
1. The city council, or planning and development committee of the city council, upon its
own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title; provided, that text amendments that are purely
administrative or procedural do not require a public hearing, nor do they require
preliminary review or recommendations of the planning commission;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
C. For the purposes of this chapter, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: “Substantive”
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development, what public infrastructure may be required of certain developments), and
“procedural” or “administrative” matters are those that relate to the process of how an
application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for applications and
appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must be submitted.
Essentially, “procedural” or “administrative” matters are the mechanical rules by which
substantive issues may be pursued). (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6198 § 3, 2008; Ord.
4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(46), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.030 Public hearing process.
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the
city council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
C. City Council Decision. The city council may affirm, modify or disaffirm any
recommendation of the planning commission or hearing examiner with regard to
amendments of the text or map of this title. (Ord. 6198 § 4, 2008; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996;
Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements.
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
DI.D Page 98 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 6
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting
the notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper
of general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in
three general public locations.
3. The process for amending Title 17, Land Adjustments and Divisions, is outlined in ACC
Section 17.02.090.
17.02.090 Amendments.
A. Initiation of Amendments.
1. The city council, or the planning and development committee of the city council, upon
its own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to
amend any portion or all of this title; provided, that no public hearing is required for a
purely administrative or procedural amendment of any portion of this title;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
B. Public Hearing and Notice.
1. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural amendments, the planning
director shall schedule a public hearing to be held before the planning commission for
any proposal to amend this title or to adopt or repeal any ordinance under the authority
established by Chapter 58.17 RCW. The director shall cause notice of such hearing to
be given as follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification a notice indicating the time and place of public hearing, describing the
general nature of the proposal, and indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or
amendment can be obtained; and
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area a notice indicating the
time and place of public hearing, describing the general nature of the proposal, and
indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or amendment may be obtained.
2. For all proposals to make purely administrative or procedural amendments to this title,
the planning director shall cause notice of such proposed amendment to be given as
follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification advance notice of the proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the
proposed amendment can be obtained.
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area advance notice of the
proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the proposed amendment can be
obtained.
3. For the purposes of this section, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: substantive
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development), and procedural or administrative matters are those that relate to the
process of how an application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for
applications and appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must
DI.D Page 99 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 6
be submitted. Essentially, procedural or administrative matters are the mechanical rules
by which substantive issues may be pursued).
C. Planning Commission Recommendation. After the public hearing has been closed,
the planning commission shall recommend to the council either adoption, adoption with
modifications, or rejection of the proposed ordinance or amendment. In formulating its
recommendation, the commission shall consider, among other things, the relationship
between the proposed ordinance or amendment and the comprehensive plan, other
applicable city policies, and other existing land use controls.
D. City Council Action. The planning director shall forward the planning commission’s
recommendation, in writing, to the council. The council may elect to hold its own public
hearing, either before the full council or before a council committee, in which case the
city clerk shall cause adequate notice to be given. The council shall consider, but shall
not be bound by, the planning commission’s recommendation in reaching its own
decision. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009.)
4. The proposed code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive
Plan as identified in the conclusion section of this staff report.
5. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed amendments on June
13, 2012. The 14-day comment period ends on June 27, 2012. The appeal periods
ends on July 11, 2012.
6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state
agencies as required for the 60-day state review required for modification of
development regulations. The amendments were sent on June 13, 2012 and expedited
review was requested. The Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on June
14, 2012. Expedited has not been granted as of the writing of this staff report. If the
request is denied then the standard 60-days applies from the submittal date of June 13,
2012.
7. Staff presented the draft code language to the Planning Commission on June 5, 2012 for
review and discussion.
8. Two comments on the proposed amendments were received; one from the Auburn
School District and the second from the Federal Way School District.
9. The public hearing notice was published on June 20, 2012 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3, 2012.
10. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 3, 2012 with no public testimony
on the proposed code amendments. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed code amendments as presented by staff.
11. The Planning and Community Development reviewed the proposed code amendments
at their July 9, 2012 meeting and recommended approval to the full City Council with no
changes to the proposed amendments.
DI.D Page 100 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 6
12. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 17, Land
Adjustments and Divisions, Title 18, Zoning, and Title 19, Impact Fees scheduled for
City Council action on July 16, 2012.
Conclusions
1. Pursuant to ACC Section 18.68.020 and 17.02.090, amendments of Titles 17 and 18
require a public hearing before the Planning Commission with a public hearing notice
published at least 10-days prior to the public hearing date.
Comment:
The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times on June 20, 2012 which is
at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3,
2012. The public hearing notice was also posted on the City’s website.
2. These code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan as
follows:
GP-3: The Planning Department will develop an annual work program that includes
work elements directed toward studying basic community needs, policy development,
and code administration.
LU-44: Home occupations in residential neighborhoods shall be permitted only if they
comply with performance standards that ensure compatibility with adjacent residential
uses.
Chapter 5 – Capital Facilities
Comment:
The proposed code amendments comply with the above comprehensive plan polices or
chapters. The Planning Department has set up an annual program where staff
documents potential amendments to the municipal code that have identified through use
of the code on project applications, results of customer inquiries, or to address changes
at the state level.
One of the proposed amendments addresses the Home Occupation regulations
(Chapter 18.64) specifically, home occupations operating on federal holidays. Staff
received a customer inquiry questioning why home occupations could not operate on
federal holidays when other businesses could operate. Allowing a home occupation
business to operate on federal holidays is not incompatible with residential uses. The
home occupation regulations would still limit the number of vehicle trips to the business.
The proposed amendment to Title 19, Impact Fees, revises when school districts are to
submit their request for an impact fee increase. When the City processes the school
district capital facilities plan (CFP) we also want to know if a school impact fee increase
is being requested so that increase can be reviewed concurrently with the CFP.
Annually the City adopts by reference the four school district CFPs.
DI.D Page 101 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6419 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 6 of 6
The remaining code amendments modify when the deadline for final short plat and final
plat submittals to be consistent with recent changes in state law, clarify regulations that
were part of the Phase 1 code update work, and remove from the Downtown Urban
Center zoning district chapter the review by the Downtown Redevelopment Committee
as that council committee no longer exists.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval as presented by staff.
DI.D Page 102 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 1 of 12
ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 1 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTERS
18.29, 18.31, 18.52, AND 18.60 WITHIN TITLE 18 ZONING
OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE
WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn zoning code
are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current development needs and
standards of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council modified its committee structure via Resolution No.
4779 removing the Downtown Redevelopment Committee; and
WHEREAS, following proper public notice, the Planning Commission considered
the proposed code amendments at a public hearing on July 3, 2012; and
WHEREAS, after fully considering the testimony and information presented at the
public hearing, on July 3, 2012, the Planning Commission made its recommendations
on the code amendments to the City of Auburn City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the
Planning Commission’s recommendation at their July 9, 2012 meeting and forwarded
their recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the environmental review on the proposal has been completed in
accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) with a
final Determination of Non-significance (DNS) issued June 13, 2012; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code
amendments were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
DI.D Page 103 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 12
Management Services, and other state agencies as required with expedited review
requested and acknowledgment received on June 14, 2012; and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code amendments
have been received from the Department of Commerce or other state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds that the proposed amendments
provide clarification to the subdivision title and comply with recent changes to state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.29.060 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.29.060 Development standards.
I. Signs. The design of all signs shall be in conformance with the design standards
referenced in ACC 18.29.070. Allowable types, numbers and sizes of signs shall be as
follows:
1. Freestanding. Not allowed, except for monument signs as described within the
“Downtown Auburn Design Standards”; no more than one per street frontage;
maximum size: 64 square feet, calculated at a rate of one square foot of sign area
per lineal foot of site frontage; minimum entitlement shall be 32 square feet;
maximum height: five feet.
2. Wall signs: maximum area of 150 square feet per building facade, calculated
at a rate of one square foot of sign area for every lineal foot of facade; minimum
entitlement shall be 16 square feet.
3. Suspended signs attached under a marquee or canopy: one double-faced
sign, no greater than three square feet per face allowed for each building entrance;
minimum maximum clearance above grade: eight feet.
4. Portable Signs. Except for Main Street frontages, Oone portable sign may be
allowed for each business entrance, not to exceed one portable sign per building
frontage, subject to the following:
a. May be placed within public right-of-way subject to the guidelines
provided by the director in consultation with the city engineer such that sign
placement does not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic and conforms
to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
b. May not exceed 36 inches in height and 30 inches in width and be
limited to two faces.
DI.D Page 104 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 12
c. May be displayed during business hours only.
d. Must be constructed of either wood or another sturdy material to ensure
stability in the wind.
e. May not move, spin, flash, or otherwise be animated.
f. Shall meet applicable supplemental design requirements of the Auburn
downtown association.
Section 2. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.29.070 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.29.070 Design standards.
Adopted by reference are the “Downtown Auburn Design Standards,” and the
“Auburn Junction Design Standards,” a copy of which shall be maintained by the city
clerk. Theseis documents contains standards for development of the built environment
in the DUC zone. The director shall have the authority to apply the standards to specific
development proposals. These standards may be amended upon approval by the
planning and community development committee of the Auburn city council except
amendments related to the four block redevelopment, bounded by West Main Street,
2nd Street SE, Auburn Avenue, and “A” Street SW, and properties within one block
radius may be amended upon approval by the downtown redevelopment committee of
the Auburn city council. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6190 § 1, 2008; Ord. 6071 § 6 (Exh.
A), 2007.)
Section 3. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.31.020 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.31.020 Fences.
A. Height Regulations. The minimum or maximum height requirements as
stipulated throughout this chapter shall be considered to be met if the height of the
fence is within six percent of the height required. The height of the fence shall be
determined from the existing, established grade on the property.
1. The following regulations shall apply in the R-1, R-5, R-7, R-10, R-16, R-20,
R-MHC, RO, RO-H, I, C-N, C-1, C-2, and DUC zones:
a. Fences may be constructed to a height not to exceed the following in
each of the required setback areas, as regulated per each zone, or as
modified by subsection B of this section:
i. Front setback: 42 inches; provided, that fences constructed of
chain link, wrought iron or similar materials that provide visibility may be
72 inches in height;
ii. Side setback: 72 inches;
iii. Rear setback: 72 inches;
iv. Street side setback: 72 inches.
DI.D Page 105 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 12
2. Fences and walls built within the building area of a lot may be as high as the
maximum building height allowed within the applicable zone. Building permits are
required for fences exceeding six feet in height.
3. If the fence includes a gate or similar feature, a vehicle refuge area shall be
provided within the driveway to avoid blocking the street. The vehicle refuge
area shall have a length that is sufficient for a waiting vehicle and not block the
street.
B. Special Height Restrictions.
1. There shall not be anything constructed or reconstructed, and no obstruction
permitted, within the sight distance triangle area as required by city of Auburn
engineering design standards.
2. In general, no fence, hedge, structure or other obstruction shall act as a sight
hazard to traffic, and the city engineer may order the removal of such hazard
whether or not such object otherwise complies with the provisions of this title.
C. Screened Fence.
1. A screened fence shall consist, at a minimum, of a chain link fence
interwoven with slats placed in every row or available space in the fence.
2. A 100 percent sight-obscuring fence shall be constructed of solid wood,
metal, concrete or other appropriate material which totally conceals the subject
use from adjoining uses.
D. Fences and Associated Landscaping.
1. When landscaping is required along the property line, the fence shall be set
back a minimum of five feet if the fence abuts a street right-of-way, so as to not
obscure such landscaping.
2. At other property lines, the landscaping shall be located to serve the greatest
public benefit.
E. Obstructions – Generally Prohibited.
1. In no case shall any fence and/or hedge be constructed or grown such that it
deters or hinders the fire authority from gaining access to any fire authority
connection, fire protection control valve, fire hydrant, or fire authority appliance or
device. Minimum clearance requirements for fire hydrants shall be in accordance
with the city design and construction standards.
2. In no case shall any fence and/or hedge obstruct the visibility of any fire
hydrant from a distance of 150 feet, in any direction, of vehicular approach to the
hydrant.
3. In no case shall any fence and/or hedge be constructed or grown in a manner
which interferes with access to storm or sanitary sewer manholes and other
appurtenances which require access for maintenance purposes.
F. Other than in the P-1, M-1 or M-2 zones, no fence may include the use of
barbed wire; provided, that pasture areas a minimum of one acre in area may be fenced
with barbed wire in any zone. Barbed wire may be attached to the top of and in addition
to the height of a 72-inch fence in the above zones, provided it does not extend more
than one additional foot in height. See ACC Section 8.12.060 for additional
requirements for nuisances related to fences such as electric fences.
DI.D Page 106 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 12
G. Any fence located within a front setback that features a locking gate or similar
security device shall provide emergency access in a manner acceptable to the fire
marshal. (Ord. 6245 § 15, 2009.)
Section 4. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.31.120 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.31.120 Accessory dwelling units.
Accessory dwelling units are permitted outright in all residential zones that permit
single-family homes, and may be developed with new or existing single-family homes.
The development standards of the underlying zone and the following siting and
performance standards shall apply to all accessory dwelling units as defined by ACC
18.04.018.
A. The home or accessory dwelling unit must be the principal place of residence
for the homeowner.
B. Only one accessory dwelling unit may be permitted per single-family
residence.
C. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be larger than 50 percent of the square
footage of the single-family home with garage space not being included in the
calculation. In no case shall the accessory dwelling unit be more than 950 square feet,
nor less than 300 square feet, nor have more than two bedrooms.
D. Exterior Appearance/Modifications.
1. Any alterations shall not change the appearance from that of a single-family
residence, as determined by the planning director.
2. Only one exterior entrance is allowed to the accessory dwelling unit and it can
be located no closer than 10 feet to an adjoining property line.
3. Any exterior stairs shall be placed in the rear or side setback and no closer
than 10 feet to an adjoining property line.
4. Where garage space is converted to living space, the garage door shall be
replaced with materials that match the exterior of the house. If a detached garage
is converted, its appearance must still be that of a detached garage and the
detached garage must be able to be used for parking of at least one vehicle.
E. Parking Requirements.
1. The parking required for the existing single-family home must meet all
requirements of the zoning code including amount, size and setback requirements
in order for an accessory dwelling unit to be allowed.
2. One additional parking space, beyond those required for the single-family
home, is required for an accessory dwelling unit. The additional parking space
must also meet all requirements of the zoning code.
3. Newly created parking shall make use of existing curb cuts, when possible.
F. An accessory dwelling unit may not be sold as a separate piece of property, or
as a condominium unit, unless allowed by the existing zoning on the property.
G. Any homeowner seeking to establish an accessory dwelling unit shall apply for
approval in accordance with the following procedures:
DI.D Page 107 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 6 of 12
1. The homeowner shall apply for an accessory dwelling unit permit with the city.
A complete application shall include a properly completed application form, floor
and structural plans, and fees. and an affidavit of owner residency. The affidavit of
owner residency must be signed before a notary public affirming that the owner
meets the requirements of subsections A through E of this section.
2. Before issuance of the certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit
permit, the homeowner must provide a copy of a statement recorded with the
county records and elections officein which the subject property is located resides.
The statement must read:
An application for a permit for an accessory dwelling unit has been submitted
to the city of Auburn by the owner of this property. Future owners are advised
that the owner of the property must comply with all requirements of the
Auburn Zoning Code, as amended, if the accessory dwelling unit is to be
occupied or rented.
H. If an accessory dwelling unit is to be removed, appropriate permits and
inspections must first be received from the city. If a homeowner wants to remove the
statement as required by subsection (G)(2) of this section from the property’s title, then
the city shall issue an appropriate release upon evidence that the accessory dwelling
unit has been removed. The release shall be recorded by the homeowner with the
county records and elections office and a copy of the recorded release shall be provided
to the city. (Ord. 6245 § 15, 2009.)
Section 5. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.52.020 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.52.020 Number of off-street parking spaces required.
Each principal use of the land, building, or structure shall provide the number of
off-street parking spaces required by this section. The following standards are not
applicable in the DUC, downtown urban center zone; refer to Chapter 18.29 ACC for
specific requirements for that zone.
A. Parking Requirements by Land Use.
1. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces. Each land use shall provide the
minimum number of off-street parking spaces required by Table 18.52.020, except
where a greater number of spaces are required through a more specific approval
process such as an administrative use permit or conditional use permit approval.
2. Uses Not Listed. Where a use is not listed in Table 18.52.020 the planning
director shall determine the number of required parking and/or loading spaces. The
planning director shall use the requirements in Table 18.52.020 as a guide in
determining the number of off-street parking spaces required based on the
similarity of uses or may consider a parking generation study.
B. Maximum Number of Parking Spaces. Except for required parking spaces for
persons with disabilities, spaces provided in park and ride lots operated by a public
transit agency, spaces for carpools, spaces for electric vehicle charging and spaces
within structured parking with two or more levels, the maximum number of parking
DI.D Page 108 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 7 of 12
spaces for nonresidential uses shall not exceed 125 percent of the minimum spaces
required by Table 18.52.020.
C. Measurement of Floor Area. In any case where Table 18.52.020 establishes a
parking requirement based on floor area in square feet (for example: two spaces per
1,000 square feet (sf) of floor area), the floor area shall be construed to mean gross
floor area (defined in ACC 18.04.430).
D. Use with Accessory Components. A single use with accessory components
shall provide parking for the primary use, and each component. For example, a hotel
with a meeting room may be required to provide the parking spaces required by Table
18.52.020 for a hotel (i.e., the guest rooms), and for a meeting room.
E. Obstruction. Removal of required parking or loading spaces from practical use
by obstruction, erection of buildings, or other actions as to reduce the parking or loading
capacity or usefulness thereof below the minimum requirements established in this
chapter is prohibited.
Table 18.52.020 Off-Street Parking Requirements by Land Use
Land Use Type: Unit of Measure: Required Parking
Rate (spaces per
unit of measure):
Residential Categories
Single-family, detached dwelling, adult
family home
Dwelling unit 2.00
Two-family dwelling (duplex) Dwelling unit 2.00
Multifamily dwelling (one and two bedroom
units)
Dwelling unit 1.50
Multifamily dwelling (three bedroom units
or more)
Dwelling unit 2.00
Mobile home dwellings1 Dwelling unit 2.00
Assisted living facilities 4 bedrooms 1.00
Plus one space for
each two
employees
Group living (includes supportive housing,
boardinghouse)
2 bedrooms 1.00
Commercial Categories
Auto, boat, or recreational vehicle sales or
leasing, new or used
5,000 square feet of
outdoor sales area
1,000 square feet of
showroom and service
1.00
1.00
DI.D Page 109 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 8 of 12
facilities
Daycare centers Each 10 children in
care
2.00
Eating and drinking establishments 1,000 square feet of
floor area
10.00
Food retail stores and markets 1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Health and fitness clubs 1,000 square feet of
floor area
10.00
Hotel or motel Guest room or rental
unit
1.00
Mini-marts and self service gas stations 1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Mortuaries or funeral homes Seat2 0.25
Motor vehicle repair and services 1,000 square feet of
floor area
2.50
Personal service shops 1,000 square feet of
floor area
2.50
Retail commercial establishments, less
than 15,000 square feet of floor area
1,000 square feet of
floor area
2.50
Retail commercial establishments, greater
than 15,000 square feet of floor area
1,000 square feet of
floor area
4.00
Shopping centers 1,000 square feet of
floor area
4.00
Office Categories
Business and professional offices 1,000 square feet of
floor area
2.00
Medical, dental, and other doctor’s offices 1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Manufacturing Processing and
Warehousing Categories (See
18.52.020(D)
All manufacturing, industrial, and
processing uses, except the following:
1,000 square feet of
floor area
1.00
Warehousing 2,000 square feet of
floor area
1.00
DI.D Page 110 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 9 of 12
Storage – Personal storage/mini-storage
facilities
Storage unit3 Minimum of 2
spaces
Recreation, Education, Public Assembly
Categories
Auditoriums, stadiums, and theaters Seat2 0.25
Commercial recreation facilities – Indoor,
except for the following:
1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Bowling alleys Lanes 5.00
Pool and billiard rooms Table 2.00
Skating rinks 1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Commercial recreation facilities – Outdoor 1,000 square feet of
usable recreational
area
3.00
Hospitals Bed 1.75
Library, museum 1,000 square feet of
floor area
2.50
Meeting facility, public or private Seat2 0.25
Religious assembly Seat2 0.20
Schools (public and private)
Kindergarten schools Employee4 1.00
Elementary/middle schools Teaching station 1.20
Secondary (high) schools Student 0.40
College or university (including trade and
business schools)
Student 0.75
Studios (dance, martial arts, etc.) 1,000 square feet of
floor area
5.00
Tennis/racquetball/handball or other sport
courts
Court
Each 300 sf of floor
area for accessory
uses
2.00
1.00
Recreational uses not listed elsewhere Same as retail, based
on size
Notes:
DI.D Page 111 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 10 of 12
1. Within mobile home parks, parking space shall not be allowed within the required
setbacks. Guest parking shall be provided within the development: five percent of total
requirement.
2. Seat, 18 inches of bench, or 25 square feet of floor space.
3. Parking shall be provided by parking/driving lanes adjacent to buildings. Two
parking spaces shall be provided adjacent to the manager’s quarters.
4. There shall be two visitor-parking stalls provided for each 10 required employee
stalls.
(Ord. 6388 § 1, 2011; Ord. 6167 § 4, 2008; Ord. 6140 § 2, 2007; Ord. 6071 § 3,
2007; Ord. 5777 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5556 § 1, 2001; Ord. 5170 § 1, 1998; Ord. 4949 § 1,
1997; Ord. 4304 § 1(40), (41), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
Section 6. Amendment to City Code. That section 18.60.020 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
18.60.020 Requirements.
Home occupations are required to have a business license as issued by the city, comply
with all city codes and ordinances, and shall be consistent with the following provisions:
A. Only members of the immediate family residing on the premises and no more
than one non-resident may be employed at any one time; provided, that home
occupations with a nonresident employee shall provide off-street parking for the
employee on site;
B. No mechanical equipment is used except such as is commonly or customarily
used for domestic, household or personal purposes for a dwelling unit (or as deemed
similar in terms of power, quantity, noise, emissions and type);
C. Not more than one-fourth of the floor area of any building is devoted to such
occupation, except for bed and breakfasts;
D. That such occupation shall not require internal or external alteration or involve
construction features not customarily found in a dwelling;
E. The home occupation shall not involve the use of personal commercial
vehicles as defined in ACC 18.04.245 for the distribution of materials to or from the
premises. Deliveries or pickups by commercial delivery services shall not apply toward
this limitation provided such pickup or delivery does not exceed twice per day;
F. The conduct of any home occupation, including but not limited to the storage
of goods and equipment, shall not reduce or render unusable areas provided for the
required off-street parking. Additional parking is not allowed in order to conduct a home
occupation, except what may be required through the issuance of a special home
occupation permit pursuant to ACC 18.60.040;
G. Only one sign is permitted, not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches in area,
nonilluminated, and attached to a building, except that home occupations in commercial
or industrial zones may have signs consistent with the applicable zoning district;
H. No display pertaining to the occupation, other than the one permitted sign, is
visible from the street or adjacent residences;
DI.D Page 112 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 11 of 12
I. No more animals are maintained on the premises than what may otherwise be
permitted in the zone;
J. Except for bed and breakfasts, employee and customer visits shall be limited
to the following hours of operation:
1. Employees from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 9:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sundays;
2. Customers from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday;
3. No employee or customer visits shall be permitted on Sundays or federal
holidays;
K. Traffic generated by the home occupation shall be limited to a maximum of
eight (two-way) client/delivery-related trips per day for those home occupations that
operate by appointment only and do not have overlapping client visits. All other home
occupations shall be limited to five (two-way) client/delivery trips per day;
L. Outdoor storage of materials, goods, products or equipment is not allowed;
M. The home occupation is to be conducted in such a manner that the residence
shall not differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials,
construction, lighting, signs, or the emissions of sounds, noises, vibrations or odors or
result in traffic impacts inconsistent with the character of the area in which the home
occupation is located. (Ord. 6141 § 1, 2007; Ord. 5897 § 21, 2005; Ord. 4229 § 2,
1987.)
Section 7. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 8. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared
to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph,
subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application
thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of
this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 9. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
INTRODUCED: __________________
DI.D Page 113 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6419
July 10, 2012
Page 12 of 12
PASSED: _______________________
APPROVED: ____________________
CITY OF AUBURN
______________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Published: _________________
DI.D Page 114 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6420
Date:
July 9, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6420
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Review Planning Commission's recommendations on amendments to Chapter 19.02 (School Impact
Fees).
See attached agenda bill.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 115 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6420 Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6420.
Background Summary:
During the 2011 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle, the Planning and Community
Development Committee requested that school impact fee adjustment requests that result in an increase
to the school impact fee be submitted to the City for review when the school district submits their capital
facilities plan.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments on July 3, 2012 and
recommended approval to the City Council with no changes to the proposed amendments.
The Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the Planning Commission’s
recommendation at their July 9, 2012 and recommended approval to the full City Council with no changes
to the proposed amendments.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Backus Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012 Item Number:
DI.E Page 116 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 6
Findings of Fact
1. In general, the intent of the proposed zoning code amendments is to provide clarification
in the regulations, address recent changes in state law, and address comments received
from customer inquiries.
2. The process for zoning code text amendments is described in ACC Chapter 18.68.,
18.68.020 Initiation of amendments.
B. Text.
1. The city council, or planning and development committee of the city council, upon its
own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title; provided, that text amendments that are purely
administrative or procedural do not require a public hearing, nor do they require
preliminary review or recommendations of the planning commission;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
C. For the purposes of this chapter, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: “Substantive”
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development, what public infrastructure may be required of certain developments), and
“procedural” or “administrative” matters are those that relate to the process of how an
application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for applications and
appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must be submitted.
Essentially, “procedural” or “administrative” matters are the mechanical rules by which
substantive issues may be pursued). (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6198 § 3, 2008; Ord.
4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(46), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.030 Public hearing process.
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the
city council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
C. City Council Decision. The city council may affirm, modify or disaffirm any
recommendation of the planning commission or hearing examiner with regard to
amendments of the text or map of this title. (Ord. 6198 § 4, 2008; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996;
Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements.
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
DI.E Page 117 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 6
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting
the notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper
of general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in
three general public locations.
3. The process for amending Title 17, Land Adjustments and Divisions, is outlined in ACC
Section 17.02.090.
17.02.090 Amendments.
A. Initiation of Amendments.
1. The city council, or the planning and development committee of the city council, upon
its own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to
amend any portion or all of this title; provided, that no public hearing is required for a
purely administrative or procedural amendment of any portion of this title;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
B. Public Hearing and Notice.
1. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural amendments, the planning
director shall schedule a public hearing to be held before the planning commission for
any proposal to amend this title or to adopt or repeal any ordinance under the authority
established by Chapter 58.17 RCW. The director shall cause notice of such hearing to
be given as follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification a notice indicating the time and place of public hearing, describing the
general nature of the proposal, and indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or
amendment can be obtained; and
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area a notice indicating the
time and place of public hearing, describing the general nature of the proposal, and
indicating how copies of the proposed ordinance or amendment may be obtained.
2. For all proposals to make purely administrative or procedural amendments to this title,
the planning director shall cause notice of such proposed amendment to be given as
follows:
a. By sending to any individual or organization which has submitted a request for
notification advance notice of the proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the
proposed amendment can be obtained.
b. By publishing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area advance notice of the
proposed amendment that indicates how copies of the proposed amendment can be
obtained.
3. For the purposes of this section, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: substantive
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development), and procedural or administrative matters are those that relate to the
process of how an application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for
applications and appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must
DI.E Page 118 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 6
be submitted. Essentially, procedural or administrative matters are the mechanical rules
by which substantive issues may be pursued).
C. Planning Commission Recommendation. After the public hearing has been closed,
the planning commission shall recommend to the council either adoption, adoption with
modifications, or rejection of the proposed ordinance or amendment. In formulating its
recommendation, the commission shall consider, among other things, the relationship
between the proposed ordinance or amendment and the comprehensive plan, other
applicable city policies, and other existing land use controls.
D. City Council Action. The planning director shall forward the planning commission’s
recommendation, in writing, to the council. The council may elect to hold its own public
hearing, either before the full council or before a council committee, in which case the
city clerk shall cause adequate notice to be given. The council shall consider, but shall
not be bound by, the planning commission’s recommendation in reaching its own
decision. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6239 § 1, 2009.)
4. The proposed code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive
Plan as identified in the conclusion section of this staff report.
5. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed amendments on June
13, 2012. The 14-day comment period ends on June 27, 2012. The appeal periods
ends on July 11, 2012.
6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state
agencies as required for the 60-day state review required for modification of
development regulations. The amendments were sent on June 13, 2012 and expedited
review was requested. The Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on June
14, 2012. Expedited has not been granted as of the writing of this staff report. If the
request is denied then the standard 60-days applies from the submittal date of June 13,
2012.
7. Staff presented the draft code language to the Planning Commission on June 5, 2012 for
review and discussion.
8. Two comments on the proposed amendments were received; one from the Auburn
School District and the second from the Federal Way School District.
9. The public hearing notice was published on June 20, 2012 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3, 2012.
10. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 3, 2012 with no public testimony
on the proposed code amendments. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed code amendments as presented by staff.
11. The Planning and Community Development reviewed the proposed code amendments
at their July 9, 2012 meeting and recommended approval to the full City Council with no
changes to the proposed amendments.
DI.E Page 119 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 6
12. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 17, Land
Adjustments and Divisions, Title 18, Zoning, and Title 19, Impact Fees scheduled for
City Council action on July 16, 2012.
Conclusions
1. Pursuant to ACC Section 18.68.020 and 17.02.090, amendments of Titles 17 and 18
require a public hearing before the Planning Commission with a public hearing notice
published at least 10-days prior to the public hearing date.
Comment:
The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times on June 20, 2012 which is
at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3,
2012. The public hearing notice was also posted on the City’s website.
2. These code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan as
follows:
GP-3: The Planning Department will develop an annual work program that includes
work elements directed toward studying basic community needs, policy development,
and code administration.
LU-44: Home occupations in residential neighborhoods shall be permitted only if they
comply with performance standards that ensure compatibility with adjacent residential
uses.
Chapter 5 – Capital Facilities
Comment:
The proposed code amendments comply with the above comprehensive plan polices or
chapters. The Planning Department has set up an annual program where staff
documents potential amendments to the municipal code that have identified through use
of the code on project applications, results of customer inquiries, or to address changes
at the state level.
One of the proposed amendments addresses the Home Occupation regulations
(Chapter 18.64) specifically, home occupations operating on federal holidays. Staff
received a customer inquiry questioning why home occupations could not operate on
federal holidays when other businesses could operate. Allowing a home occupation
business to operate on federal holidays is not incompatible with residential uses. The
home occupation regulations would still limit the number of vehicle trips to the business.
The proposed amendment to Title 19, Impact Fees, revises when school districts are to
submit their request for an impact fee increase. When the City processes the school
district capital facilities plan (CFP) we also want to know if a school impact fee increase
is being requested so that increase can be reviewed concurrently with the CFP.
Annually the City adopts by reference the four school district CFPs.
DI.E Page 120 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6420 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 6 of 6
The remaining code amendments modify when the deadline for final short plat and final
plat submittals to be consistent with recent changes in state law, clarify regulations that
were part of the Phase 1 code update work, and remove from the Downtown Urban
Center zoning district chapter the review by the Downtown Redevelopment Committee
as that council committee no longer exists.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval as presented by staff.
DI.E Page 121 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6420
July 10, 2012
Page 1 of 4
ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 2 0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION
19.02.050 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATED TO
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn code are
appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current development needs and
standards of the City; and
WHEREAS, during the 2011 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle, the
City Council requested that school impact fee adjustment requests that result in an
increase be submitted to the City for review when the school district submits their capital
facilities plan rather than later in the process; and
WHEREAS, following proper public notice, the Planning Commission considered
the proposed code amendment at a public hearing on July 3, 2012; and
WHEREAS, after fully considering the testimony and information presented at the
public hearing, on July 3, 2012, the Planning Commission made its recommendations
on the code amendment to the City of Auburn City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the
Planning Commission’s recommendation at their July 9, 2012 meeting and forwarded
their recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the environmental review on the proposal has been completed in
accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) with a
final Determination of Non-significance (DNS) issued June 13, 2012; and
DI.E Page 122 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6420
July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code
amendments were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
Management Services, and other state agencies as required with expedited review
requested and acknowledgment received on June 14, 2012; and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding the proposed zoning code amendments
have been received from the Department of Commerce or other state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds that the proposed amendments
provide clarification to the subdivision title and comply with recent changes to state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That section 19.02.050 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
19.02.050 Submission of district capital facilities plan and data.
A. On an annual basis (by July 1st or on a date agreed to by district and the city
and stipulated in the interlocal agreement), any district for which the city is collecting
impact fees shall submit the following materials to the city council:
1. The district’s capital facilities plan (as defined herein) as adopted by the school
board;
2. The district’s enrollment projections over the next six years, its current
enrollment and the district’s enrollment projections and actual enrollment from the
previous year;
3. The district’s adopted standard of service;
4. The district’s overall capacity over the next six years, which shall take into
account the available capacity from school facilities planned by the district but not
yet built and be a function of the district’s standard of service as measured by the
number of students which can be housed in district facilities; and
5. An inventory of the district’s existing facilities; and
6. If the school impact fee adjustment request by the school district increases
the school impact fee, the request shall be in writing to the City and submitted
concurrently with the district’s capital facilities plan..
B. To the extent that the district’s standard of service identifies a deficiency in its
existing facilities, the district’s capital facilities plan must identify the sources of funding
other than impact fees for building or acquiring the necessary facilities to serve the
DI.E Page 123 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6420
July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 4
existing student population in order to eliminate the deficiencies within a reasonable
period of time.
C. Facilities to meet future demand shall be designed to meet the adopted
standard of service. If sufficient funding is not projected to be available to fully fund a
capital facilities plan which meets the adopted standard of service, the district’s capital
facilities plan should document the reason for the funding gap, and identify all sources
of funding that the district plans to use to meet the adopted standard of service.
D. The district shall also submit annually to the city a report showing the capital
improvements for which the impact fees have been used.
E. In its development of the financing plan component of its capital facilities plan,
the district shall plan on a six-year horizon and shall demonstrate its best efforts by
taking the following steps:
1. Establish a six-year financing plan, and propose the necessary bond issues,
levies, and/or financing measures required by and consistent with that plan and as
approved by the school board consistent with state law; and
2. Where applicable, apply to the state for funding, and comply with the state
requirements for eligibility to the best of the district’s ability. (Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011;
Ord. 5078 § 1, 1998.)
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared
to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph,
subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application
thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of
this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
INTRODUCED: __________________
PASSED: _______________________
DI.E Page 124 of 335
----------------------------------
Ordinance No. 6420
July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 4
APPROVED: ____________________
CITY OF AUBURN
______________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Published: _________________
DI.E Page 125 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6414
Date:
July 9, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6414
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Review Planning Commission recommendation on amendments to Section 12.64A.030,
Chapter 13,40 and Creating a New Chapter 17.28.
See attached agenda bill.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 126 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6414 Date: July 10, 2012
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6414 Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6414.
Background Summary:
The City, as part of its requirements for public improvements, requires that conduit be constructed when
frontage improvements are required within arterial streets for the City’s data and communications
network.
The proposed code changes require the conduit be constructed when frontage improvements are
required within any street not just arterial streets. Staff is also recommending a new chapter be created
to Title 17, Land Adjustments and Divisions, specifically related to infrastructure conduit. This proposed
new chapter would apply to development activity governed by Title 17, such as short plats and
preliminary plats.
These recommended code changes are needed for the City to continue providing services to the public
that allow for system wide coordinated management of facilities (e.g. traffic control devices) that are
monitored remotely and whereas new technologies present additional opportunities for the City to utilize
its data and communication infrastructure to enhance public services.
By requiring these improvements as part of the street improvements is more cost effective while the street
is under construction as part of a development rather than opening the street only for installation of
conduit.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 3, 2012 and recommended to the City Council
approval of the proposed code amendments as presented by staff.
The Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the Planning Commission’s
recommendation at their July 9, 2012 meeting and recommended approval to the full City Council.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Backus Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: July 16, 2012 Item Number:
DI.F Page 127 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6414 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 2 of 5
Findings of Fact
1. In general, the intent of the proposed code amendments is to provide for conduit when
frontage improvements are required of projects so that the City’s data and
communication network can be enhanced.
2. The process for zoning code text amendments is described in ACC Chapter 18.68.,
18.68.020 Initiation of amendments.
B. Text.
1. The city council, or planning and development committee of the city council, upon its
own motion may request the planning commission to conduct a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title; provided, that text amendments that are purely
administrative or procedural do not require a public hearing, nor do they require
preliminary review or recommendations of the planning commission;
2. The planning commission may upon its own motion call for a public hearing to amend
any portion or all of this title, with the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments;
3. Any resident or property owner of the city may petition the city to request an
amendment to the text of this title.
C. For the purposes of this chapter, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from
procedural or administrative amendments in accordance with the following: “Substantive”
matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done in terms of conduct,
use or action (e.g., what use may be made of land, what requirements apply to
development, what public infrastructure may be required of certain developments), and
“procedural” or “administrative” matters are those that relate to the process of how an
application to take such action must be pursued (e.g., time limits for applications and
appeals, what forms must be used, and where or how applications must be submitted.
Essentially, “procedural” or “administrative” matters are the mechanical rules by which
substantive issues may be pursued). (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6198 § 3, 2008; Ord.
4840 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4304 § 1(46), 1988; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.030 Public hearing process.
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the
city council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
C. City Council Decision. The city council may affirm, modify or disaffirm any
recommendation of the planning commission or hearing examiner with regard to
amendments of the text or map of this title. (Ord. 6198 § 4, 2008; Ord. 4840 § 1, 1996;
Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements.
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
DI.F Page 128 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6414 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 3 of 5
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting
the notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper
of general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in
three general public locations.
3. The proposed code amendments are supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive
Plan.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed amendments on June
13, 2012. The 14-day comment period ends on June 27, 2012. The appeal periods
ends on July 11, 2012.
5. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state
agencies as required for the 60-day state review required for modification of
development regulations. The amendments were sent on June 13, 2012 and expedited
review was requested. The Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on June
14, 2012. Expedited has not been granted as of the writing of this staff report. If the
request is denied then the standard 60-days applies from the submittal date of June 13,
2012.
6. Staff presented the draft code language to the Planning Commission on June 5, 2012 for
review and discussion.
7. The public hearing notice was published on June 20, 2012 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3, 2012.
8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 3, 2012 with no public testimony
on the proposed code amendments. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed code amendments as presented by staff.
9. The Planning and Community Development reviewed the proposed code amendments
at their July 9, 2012 meeting and recommended approval to the full City Council with no
changes to the proposed amendments.
10. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Section 12.64A.030,
Chapter 13.40, and Title 17, Land Adjustments and Divisions scheduled for the Planning
Commission’s July 3, 2012 public hearing with a staff recommendation.
Conclusions
1. Pursuant to ACC Section 18.68.020 amendments to Title 18, Zoning, require a public
hearing before the Planning Commission with a public hearing notice published at least
10-days prior to the public hearing date.
Comment:
DI.F Page 129 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6414 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 4 of 5
The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times on June 20, 2012 which is
at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for July 3,
2012. The public hearing notice was also posted on the City’s website.
2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
Chapter 5 – Capital Facilities
CF-12 No new development shall be approved which is not supported by a minimum of
facilities to support the development and which does not provide for a proportionate
share of related system needs.
Objective 13.4 To enhance the City’s communications and data infrastructure through
installation of City-owned conduit throughout the city.
Policies:
CF-55 To allow for expansion of the City’s conduit system with minimal disruption to
streets and at a lower cost to the public, the City shall require the placement of conduits
as part of arterial street (as defined in the City of Auburn Transportation Plan)
improvement projects whether private or public development projects.
CF-56 The City shall explore new technologies that may present additional opportunities
for the City to use its communications and data infrastructure to enhance its provisions
of public services.
CF-57 To increase system-wide coordinated management of facilities, the City shall
work towards increasing the number of remote monitoring facilities for utility facilities,
traffic control devices, and other equipment located throughout the city.
CF-58 Whenever possible, make remote data access available to the City’s police
officers, inspectors, utility staff, and other field personnel.
Comment:
The proposed code amendments comply with the above comprehensive plan objective and
policies. Through the proposed code amendments, the City is allowing for expansion of the
City’s conduit system with minimal disruption to the public by requiring the installation of conduit
when certain frontage improvements may be required of development projects. Requiring the
installation of conduit when work within the public right-of-way is already taking place is more
cost effective and less disruptive to the public then making the improvements at a different time.
A goal of the City’s is to expand the City’s data and communication network to provide system
wide coordination of facilities such as traffic control devices and other utility facilities that are
monitored and operated remotely.
Developments are expected to provide for their proportionate share of related system needs
and the City has identified its data and communication network as a system need. The
DI.F Page 130 of 335
Agenda Subject: Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6414 Date: July 10, 2012
Page 5 of 5
proposed code amendments are structured to allow the flexibility of requiring conduit to be
installed when certain frontage improvements are required not an absolute requirement.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council.
DI.F Page 131 of 335
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6414
May 30, 2012
Page 1 of 5
ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 1 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION
12.64A.030 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE AND
CREATING A SECTION 13.40.040 AND A NEW CHAPTER
17.28 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE
INSTALLATION OF CITY-OWNED IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that enhancing the City’s data and
communications infrastructure allows the City to provide services to the public in a more
effective and efficient manner; and
WHEREAS, making remote data access available to the City’s police officers,
inspectors, utility staff, and other field personnel allows them to devote more time to
providing services to the community and less time traveling to and from City offices and
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City has a number of utility facilities, traffic control devices, and
other equipment located throughout the City that are monitored and operated remotely;
and
WHEREAS, increasing the number of such remote facilities connected to the
City’s data and communications infrastructure allows for system-wide, coordinated
management of such facilities; and
WHEREAS, new technologies may present additional opportunities for the City to
use its data and communications infrastructure to enhance its provision of public
services; and
DI.F Page 132 of 335
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6414
May 30, 2012
Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the installation of City-owned conduit
throughout the City would enhance the City’s data and communications infrastructure;
and
WHEREAS, requiring the placement of City conduits in trenches opened in City
rights-of-way as part of a development project allows for expansion of the City conduit
system at a lower cost to the public and with fewer opening of the City’s streets; and
WHEREAS, the cost of adding such conduit to an already opened trench would
be proportional to the benefit of enhanced public services received by the owner of the
developing property; and
WHEREAS, it is important to the City and to those persons and entities within the
City who depend on the availability of the data and communications infrastructure
services that would be able to be provided through the conduits in City streets to have
those conduits and infrastructure in as many streets as possible, and all due
consideration shall be given to the need for the installation of City-owned conduit in
street improvements, in terms of the improvements that should be required in
connection with the related development or permit activity.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Section 12.64A.030 of the Auburn
City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
12.64A.030 Requirements.
The city engineer shall determine in consultation with police; parks,
arts, and recreation; planning and development department; information
services; and the local fire authority whether one or more of the following
public right-of-way improvements are necessary to mitigate the impacts of
a permitted action set forth in ACC 12.64A.020. which improvements shall,
after construction and installation, be dedicated to and owned by the City
DI.F Page 133 of 335
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6414
May 30, 2012
Page 3 of 5
Construction or provision of those improvements in the manner specified
by the city engineer shall be a condition of granting said permit:
A. Paved roadway on the same side of the street as the subject
property;
B. Street lighting;
C. Sidewalks on the same side of the street as the subject
property;
D. Concrete curbs and gutters on the same side of the street as
the subject property;
E. Storm drainage systems;
F. Street landscaping and appurtenances on the same side of
the street as the subject property;
G. Traffic control and other safety devices including, but not
limited to, provisions for channelization, pavement markings, signage,
pedestrian safety, and traffic calming;
H. Dedication of public right-of-way on the same side of the
street as the subject property;
I. Conduit at least three inches in diameter in arterial any
streets/public right-of-way being improved under this chapter. (Ord. 6287 §
2, 2010; Ord. 6112 § 1, 2007; Ord. 6083 § 2, 2007.)
Section 2. New Section to City Code. That a new Section 13.40.040 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as follows:
13.40.040 Dedication and ownership of improvements.
Unless otherwise expressly provided, the improvements required
pursuant to this Chapter 13.40 shall, after construction and installation, be
dedicated to and owned by the City.
Section 3. New Chapter to City Code. That a new Chapter 17.28 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as follows:
Chapter 17.28
Infrastructure Conduit
Section:
17.28.010 Infrastructure conduit in streets.
17.28.010 Infrastructure conduit in streets.
In addition to the other requirements set forth in this Title 17, any
time street improvements or right-of-way improvements are to be provided
in connection with development activity governed hereby, the City review
process shall determine in consultation with public works, police, parks,
arts, and recreation; planning and development departments, information
services, and with the local fire authority, whether conduit at least three
DI.F Page 134 of 335
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6414
May 30, 2012
Page 4 of 5
inches in diameter should be included therein, in which cases, if so
required, the applicant shall construct said improvement in conformance
with the public facility extension requirements of Chapter 13.40 of the City
Code.
Section 4. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 6. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
DATED and SIGNED this ____ day of _______________, 2012.
INTRODUCED: __________________
PASSED: _______________________
APPROVED: ____________________
CITY OF AUBURN
______________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
DI.F Page 135 of 335
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6414
May 30, 2012
Page 5 of 5
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
Published: _________________
DI.F Page 136 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4835
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4835
Exhibit A: Proposal
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
The Auburn City Council has identified the construction of a 20,100 square foot community center at the
Les Gove Community Campus as a priority capital project that will benefit the public health, safety and
welfare through the provision of educational, cultural and social activities and large non-programmed
community meeting spaces. The City of Auburn has worked with a team of professionals to complete the
design process, prepare construction bid level drawings and obtain all necessary permits for the
Community Center. The City has secured funding for a portion of the total cost of the Community Center,
but a funding gap remains. The City has determined the need to identify and explore alternative means of
funding to address this funding gap including one or more or combination thereof of 63-20 tax exempt
bonds, New Market Tax Credits, city funds, non-profit institutional grants and other local, state, regional or
federal funds.
City staff conducted substantive research and analysis and identified that the services of a qualified non-
profit facilitator should be sought to assist the City in the development and operation of the community
center through single asset/bankruptcy remote 501(c)(3) entity creation and implementation, project
financing structuring, coordination and compliance, real estate development oversight and management
and asset management and operation. A possible deal structure with the selected Non-Profit Facilitator
could consist of the following key actions: non-profit facilitator selected by the City; Non-profit facilitator
creates a single-purpose nonprofit corporation; single-purpose non-profit corporation contracts with a
developer for design consultation services and construction of the facility; city leases facility from single-
purpose non-profit corporation; single-purpose non-profit corporation contracts for facility operations and
maintenance during the lease period; and, facility is turned over to the City at no cost at the end of the
lease.
City staff, after consultation with the Les Gove Community Campus Committee, issued a Request for
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.G Page 137 of 335
Proposals for non-profit facilitator services with a submittal deadline date of June 22, 2012 and advertised
in the May 25, 2012 and June 1, 2012 editions of the Seattle Times and the Daily Journal of Commerce,
respectively, as well as publication of the Request and relevant associated information on the City's web
site. The City received one (1) response to the Request for Proposals from the National Development
Council, a national non-profit community and economic development organization founded in 1969 whose
stated key purpose is to increase the flow of capital to underserved urban and rural areas across the
United States. City staff reviewed the response from the National Development Council and found it to be
in substantial conformance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal.
The Les Gove Community Campus Committee on unanimous motion action recommended approval of
Resolution No. 4835 to the full City Council at its July 11, 2012 regular meeting.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works, Les Gove Community Campus Other: Legal; Parks, Arts and Recreation;
Mayor's Office
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.G
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.G Page 138 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4835
July 5, 2012
Page 1 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 4835
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE
NEGOTIATIONS AND EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT
FOR NON-PROFIT FACILITATOR SERVICES WITH
THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL FOR THE
AUBURN COMMUNITY CENTER AT THE LES GOVE
COMMUNITY CAMPUS
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council has identified the construction of a
20,100 square foot community center at the Les Gove Community Campus as a
priority capital project that will benefit the public health, safety and welfare
through the provision of educational, cultural and social activities and large non-
programmed community meeting spaces; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn Community Center will operate as a joint-use
facility featuring a spacious and welcoming lobby and a large community
gathering space for up to 350 people as well as dividable space for recreational
activities, programs and classes as well as meeting space/classrooms, office,
lobby, kitchen, restrooms and storage; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn Community Center is intended to serve the entire
Auburn community and will be open year-round and be used for various health,
fitness and wellness programs; multi-generational and multi-cultural events;
special events; evening family programs; art, craft and music; community
education and specialty classes; expanded youth and pre-school programs;
meetings and corporate events; and wedding receptions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has worked with a team of professionals to
complete the design process, prepare construction bid level drawings and obtain
DI.G Page 139 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4835
July 5, 2012
Page 2 of 4
all necessary permits for the Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the City has secured funding for a portion of the total cost of
the Community Center, but a funding gap remains; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined the need to identify and explore
alternative means of funding to address this funding gap including one or more or
combination thereof of 63-20 tax exempt bonds, New Market Tax Credits, City
funds, non-profit institutional grants and other local, state, regional or federal
funds.
WHEREAS, after substantive research and analysis, the City determined
that the services of a qualified non-profit facilitator should be sought to assist the
City in the development and operation of the community center through single
asset/bankruptcy remote 501(c)(3)1 entity creation and implementation, project
financing structuring, coordination and compliance, real estate development
oversight and management and asset management and operation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn anticipates a deal structure will occur with
the selected Non-Profit Facilitator that will consist of the following key actions:
non-profit facilitator selected by the City; Non-profit facilitator creates a single-
purpose nonprofit corporation; single-purpose non-profit corporation contracts
with a developer for design consultation services and construction of the facility;
city leases facility from single-purpose non-profit corporation; single-purpose
non-profit corporation contracts for facility operations and maintenance during the
lease period; and, facility is turned over to the City at no cost at the end of the
1 26 USC 501(c)(3).
DI.G Page 140 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4835
July 5, 2012
Page 3 of 4
lease; and,
WHEREAS, following input and direction from the Les Gove Community
Campus Committee, staff issued a Request for Proposals for said non-profit
facilitator services with a submittal deadline date of June 22, 2012 and advertised
in the May 25, 2012 and June 1, 2012 editions of The Seattle Times and The
Daily Journal of Commerce, respectively, as well as publication of the Request
and relevant associated information on the City’s web site; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received one (1) response to the Request
for Proposals from the National Development Council, a national non-profit
community and economic development organization founded in 1969 whose
stated key purpose is to increase the flow of capital to underserved urban and
rural areas across the United States; and
WHEREAS, the Les Gove Community Campus Committee and staff
reviewed the response from the National Development Council and found it to be
in substantial conformance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal;
and
WHEREAS, the Les Gove Community Campus Committee, at its meeting
on July 11, 2012, recommended on motion action to the full City Council approval
of Resolution No. 4835, authorizing the Mayor to conduct negotiations and
execute a contract with the National Development Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE as follows:
Section 1. Contract Negotiations and Execution. The Mayor and City
DI.G Page 141 of 335
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 4835
July 5, 2012
Page 4 of 4
Clerk are authorized to conduct negotiations, and upon successful conclusion of
said negotiations, execute a contract with the National Development Council for
the provision of Non-Profit Facilitator Services for the Auburn Community Center
at the Les Gove Community Campus in substantial conformity with the
documents attached hereto, collectively marked as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution
and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby
authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary
to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect
upon passage and signatures hereon.
DATED AND SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF_________________, 2012.
________________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.G Page 142 of 335
DI.G Page 143 of 335
DI.G Page 144 of 335
DI.G Page 145 of 335
DI.G Page 146 of 335
DI.G Page 147 of 335
DI.G Page 148 of 335
DI.G Page 149 of 335
DI.G Page 150 of 335
DI.G Page 151 of 335
DI.G Page 152 of 335
DI.G Page 153 of 335
DI.G Page 154 of 335
DI.G Page 155 of 335
DI.G Page 156 of 335
DI.G Page 157 of 335
DI.G Page 158 of 335
DI.G Page 159 of 335
DI.G Page 160 of 335
DI.G Page 161 of 335
DI.G Page 162 of 335
DI.G Page 163 of 335
DI.G Page 164 of 335
DI.G Page 165 of 335
DI.G Page 166 of 335
DI.G Page 167 of 335
DI.G Page 168 of 335
DI.G Page 169 of 335
DI.G Page 170 of 335
DI.G Page 171 of 335
DI.G Page 172 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4836
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4836
Map
Exhibit A
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn and the Washington State Department of Transportation have been negotiating for
some time on the transfer and exchange of real property between the entities. This real property
negotiation involves the transfer and exchange of 48.24 acres of current State owned property. The State's
total current ownership is 58.29 acres that was originally acquired for future highway expansion and to
create environmental mitigation sites when required by nearby highway projects. The State has
determined that it only needs 10.05 acres of its current ownership for future highway projects. The land
under consideration for transfer and exchange is located immediately west of State Route 167 and south
of 15th Street NW and includes of 34.04 acres of non-mitigation land and two environmental mitigation
sites totaling approximately 14 acres, of which one is certified and has met federal agency requirements
while the other is in year 5 of 10 of its compliance program before being eligible for certification. Per the
proposed agreement, the State would retain responsibility for maintenance and monitoring of the non-
certified mitigation site until it is certified.
The real property transfer also involves the transfer and exchange of 9.91 acres of current City-owned
property (a portion of the properties referred to locally as Godecke North) to the State. The State needs
this property for use in planned improvements to State Route 167. As part of its acquisition of this property
from the City, the State is obligated to pay the cost to relocate an existing City sewer line located on the
City's property. The current estimated cost to relocate this line is approximately $2 million. The fair market
value of the 34.04 acres of the State owned land is currently $680,000 while the fair market value of the
City owned property is currently $789,700. The State conducted appraisals of the properties that were
reviewed and agreed to by the City. For purposes of appraising land values, the two mitigation sites were
determined to not have any land value resulting from their restricted status as environmental mitigation
sites. Based on the higher land value of the City owned land, the State proposes to pay the City $109,700,
within 30 days after deed recordation, to account for this difference in fair market values. The City and the
State propose to split incidental costs such as closing and recording costs associated with execution of the
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H Page 173 of 335
transfer and exchange.
The current City property is owned by the City's sewer enterprise fund. The Public Works Department has
determined that this property is not needed by the fund for current or future needs. Because the transfer
and exchange of properties between the two entities involves land owned by the City's sewer fund, any
land acquired by the City from the State would also be legally under the ownership of the sewer fund. The
48.24 acres proposed for transfer to the City of Auburn comprises a significant portion of Phase II of the
Auburn Environmental Park previously identified by the Auburn City Council bringing the Park's total
combined acreage to approximately 198 acres. On-going operation and maintenance of the acquired land
would be the responsibility of the sewer fund with input and assistance from the City's environmental
services staff.
Resolution No. 4836 inclusive of a detailed Agreement between the two parties would upon passage by
the City Council, authorize to the Mayor to complete negotiations and execute the Agreement. The
Planning and Community Development Committees on unanimous motion action recommended approval
of Resolution No. 4836 to the full City Council at its July 9, 2012 regular meeting.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Legal, Public Works
Department
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Snyder/Heid/Dowdy
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.H
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H Page 174 of 335
--------------------------------------
Resolution No. 4836
July 3, 2012
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4 8 3 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER AND
EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN THE CITY
AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION REGARDING PHASE II OF THE
AUBURN ENVIRONMENTAL PARK
WHEREAS, the owner of a piece of property located in the vicinity of 15th Street
Northwest and State Highway 167 and identified by the City of Auburn as part of its
intended eventual Auburn Environmental Park (Phase II) made some claims against the
City and the State of Washington regarding that property, claiming that the property was
taken by inverse condemnation since storm water run-off mostly coming from
improvements State Highway 167 damaged the utility of his property; and
WHEREAS, particularly since the City was interested in acquiring this property
for the Auburn Environmental Park, the parties, including the City of Auburn and the
property owner, as well as the State of Washington Department of Transportation,
reached an agreement in the resolution of any and all such claims by the owner, which
agreement was approved by the City Council through Resolution No. 4626, passed on
July 19, 2010; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the resolution of the claims, the City was to be
responsible for payment of the agreed-upon price to the owner of the property and the
Department of Transportation was to convey to the City property on the West side of
State Highway 167 and identified by the City of Auburn as part of its intended eventual
Auburn Environmental Park, Phase II; and
DI.H Page 175 of 335
--------------------------------------
Resolution No. 4836
July 3, 2012
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, the agreement between the City and the Department of
Transportation was that instead of participating in or contributing to the payment of
monies to the owner, the Department of Transportation would convey to the City certain
property located on the west side of State Highway 167, which conveyance was slated
to occur after the Department of Transportation used that property for wetland mitigation
purposes; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the interests of the City and the Department of
Transportation to have the property conveyed to the City, the Department of
Transportation identified an interest it had in other property owned by the City which it
sought to acquire and for which it was willing to make the conveyance of the property on
the west side of State Highway 167 sooner, rather than waiting until it had used the
property for wetland mitigation; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Department of Transportation negotiated terms
providing for the exchange of properties and related responsibilities, relating to both the
exchange of property to the City for the Auburn Environmental Park and the property to
be acquired by the Department of Transportation, and which responsibilities included
the obligation of the Department of Transportation to pay the City for decommissioning
and removing from service a section City sewage facilities located on the property to be
acquired by the Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the terms of the agreement between the City and the Department of
Transportation are beneficial to the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
DI.H Page 176 of 335
--------------------------------------
Resolution No. 4836
July 3, 2012
Page 3 of 3
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute the
Agreement and documents providing for the transfer and exchange of real property
between the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation regarding
Phase II of the Auburn Environmental Park in substantial conformity with the documents
attached hereto, collectively marked as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
___________________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
DI.H Page 177 of 335
Resolution No. 4836 - Location of Exchange Properties
Printed Date:
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy.
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
7/5/2012
DI.H Page 178 of 335
Exhibit A
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO
TRANSFER REAL PROPERTY
The State of Washington, acting by and through its Department of Transportation
(Department) and the City of Auburn (City), collectively referred to as the Parties, enter this
Agreement on the date last written on its final page. This Agreement binds the successors,
assigns, subsidiaries, officials, agents, representatives, servants, employees, officers, and sureties
of both Parties.
I. RECITALS
This Agreement is based on the following facts and representations, all of which the
Parties agree are true:
A. The Auburn Land Company (ALC) owned property, consisting of approximately 28.92
acres, within Auburn’s city limits that is located immediately east of SR 167 (a state
limited access highway) and immediately south of 15th Street NW (a city street). A legal
description of the ALC property is attached as Exhibit A. ALC claimed the Parties were
depositing and trapping water on ALC’s property. ALC sued the Parties under King
County Superior Court cause number 07-2-16064-7 KNT.
B. ALC’s suit sought at least $6,000,000 from the Parties. Both Parties had defenses to
ALC’s claims and suit. Neither Party admitted liability.
C. Under two separate agreements (collected in Exhibit D), the City paid $75,000 to obtain
dismissal of ALC’s lawsuit and ALC released all claims against both the City and the
Department. The City subsequently purchased ALC’s property (the ALC property) for
the 2010 King County assessed value of $629,800.00. Exhibit G, attached hereto, is the
real estate purchase and sale agreement for that transaction. The Department did not
contribute any cash to the settlement payment or to the purchase of the ALC property.
D. The City granted the Department a drainage easement to drain highway stormwater onto
the ALC property. The recorded easement is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
E. The State of Washington owns property, consisting of approximately 58.29 acres, west of
and across SR 167 from the ALC property. The property is bordered by West Valley
Highway (a city street), SR 167, and by 15th Street NW, which connects the other two
roads. A legal description of the state-owned property is attached as Exhibit B. The
State acquired this property for the Department’s future highway expansion and to create
environmental mitigation sites when required by nearby Department highway projects.
F. The Department has created two environmental mitigation sites on the state-owned
property. One mitigation site, consisting of approximately 8.71 acres (379,408 square
feet), has been certified by the agency requiring the mitigation. A legal description of
this mitigation site is attached as Exhibit C-1. The other mitigation site, consisting of
approximately 5.49 acres (239,145 square feet), is in Year 5 of a 10 year monitoring
Page 1 of 11
DI.H Page 179 of 335
Exhibit A
period and has not yet been certified by the agency requiring the mitigation. A legal
description of this mitigation site is attached as Exhibit C-2. The 5.49 acre site may be
certified in less than the full 10 years. The existing mitigation sites are depicted on
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
G. The Department needs 10.05 acres of the state-owned property for future highway
projects. The approximate boundaries of this reserved 10.05 acres are also depicted on
Exhibit C.
H. Once the Department has established a certified mitigation site, it has used the state-
owned property for the public purpose for which it was acquired. Transfer of a certified
mitigation site reduces the Department’s maintenance obligations.
I. The City is creating a large environmental park, consisting of wetlands. The City has
identified both the ALC property and the state-owned property as within the boundaries
of the future park. The City also lacks adequate mitigation land, potentially restricting
new development within the City.
J. Acquiring the ALC property provided the City with potential mitigation land and added
to the City’s environmental park. Transfer of the two mitigation sites from the state-
owned property would also add to the City’s environmental park.
K. The Department has authority under RCW 47.12.370 to transfer environmental mitigation
sites to other entities, including local governments, so long as the transferee agrees to
assume all future maintenance and operation obligations in perpetuity.
L. As part of a planned improvement to SR 167, the Department needs to acquire
approximately 9.91 acres (431,858 square feet) from an approximately 23.06 acre
(1,004,400 square feet) parcel of City-owned land located west of SR 167, north of SR
18, and east of West Valley Highway. That parcel is also known as and is hereinafter
referred to as Department Parcel Number 1-22952. The legal description of the 9.91 acre
portion of Parcel Number 1-22952 that the Department wishes to acquire is attached
hereto as Exhibit H. Parcel Number 1-22952 and the portion of it that the Department
wishes to acquire are also both depicted on a Department Sundry Site Plan, attached
hereto as Exhibit I.
M. Approximately 34.04 acres (1,482,783 square feet) of the State-owned property is not
being used for existing mitigation projects or being reserved for future highway projects.
The Department has determined that those 34.04 acres are surplus to its needs. The legal
description of this surplus property is attached as Exhibit C-3.Those 34.04 acres are also
depicted on Exhibit C.
N. The just compensation for the 9.91 acre portion of parcel 1-22952 that the Department
wishes to acquire is approximately$789,700. The fair market value of the remaining
34.04 acres of the State-owned land is approximately $680,000. Exchange of the two
properties would provide the City with potential mitigation land and add to the City’s
Page 2 of 11
DI.H Page 180 of 335
Exhibit A
environmental park. The exchange would also provide the Department the land it needs
for its SR 167 highway project.
O. Whether it acquires the 9.91 acres of parcel 1-22952 by purchase or exchange, the
Department would be obligated to pay the cost to relocate a City sewer line located on
those 9.91 acres.
P. The Department has authority under at least RCW 47.12.063, RCW 47.12.080, and RCW
47.12.287 to exchange its 34.04 acres for the City’s 9.91 acres.
Q. To the extent that this Agreement is not authorized by the statutes governing the
Department’s transfer, exchange, or sale of state-owned property, the Department enters
into this Agreement based on its and the Washington State Attorney General’s authority
to settle claims against the Department.
R. The Parties entered into the agreements collected in Exhibit D and into this agreement in
part to eliminate the risk of ALC’s claims in a way that reduced public expense and that
achieved legitimate public purposes of each Party. The Parties also wish to obtain
property needed to fulfill the public purposes of each Party with minimum expenditure of
public funds.
II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, in furtherance of the foregoing, for value received, and in consideration
of the following terms and conditions and the attached Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and
K, which are incorporated herein by this reference, the Parties agree as follows:
1. In lieu of a cash contribution to the City’s payments to dismiss the ALC lawsuit and to
release ALC’s claims, the Department agrees to convey by quitclaim deed the two
existing mitigation sites located on the state-owned property described in Exhibit B, but
only on the following terms and conditions:
a. The Department will reserve a drainage easement burdening the transferred property,
which will substantially conform to the drainage easement included within Exhibit F,
a sample quitclaim deed for transfer of the mitigation sites.
b. The Department agrees to maintain and monitor the 5.49 acre mitigation site until it is
certified by the agency requiring mitigation. The Department will reserve an
easement allowing it access to perform the necessary maintenance and monitoring
until the site is certified.
c. Sole consideration for Department conveyance of the two mitigation sites will be (i)
the City’s agreement to forever assume all future maintenance and operation
obligations and costs required to properly maintain and operate each mitigation site
after each is certified; (ii) the City’s actions that resulted in dismissal/release of
Page 3 of 11
DI.H Page 181 of 335
Exhibit A
ALC’s claims against the State; and (iii) the City’s agreement to fully comply with
Section 2, below.
d. Conveyance of each mitigation site will be by quitclaim deed complying with RCW
47.12.370, as now or hereinafter amended. The Department will prepare and send to
the City quitclaim deeds, which will substantially conform to the sample attached as
Exhibit F, for the two existing mitigation sites within 90 days after this agreement is
fully signed, together with copies of the documents creating, permitting, and/or
certifying each mitigation site. The City shall be responsible for any closing,
recording, or filing costs in connection with the said quitclaim deeds.
2. As required by RCW 47.12.370, the City agrees to accept ownership of transferred
environmental mitigation sites by quitclaim deed and, unless the sites, or either of them,
revert(s) back to State ownership pursuant to paragraph 2.e, below, to be responsible in
perpetuity for the maintenance, operation, and preservation of the mitigation sites after
each is certified by the agency requiring mitigation, including all costs associated with
such responsibilities, as follows in paragraphs 2.a. through 2.d. The City agrees that
failure to comply with any provision of this paragraph or of paragraphs 2.a. through 2.d.
will result in reversion of the conveyed mitigation site pursuant to paragraph 2.e:
a. The City may only use and allow others to use each transferred mitigation site as a
mitigation site consistent with preservation of the functions and values of the
particular site identified in the documents creating, permitting, or certifying the site,
as those documents exist on the effective date of this agreement or as they may be
amended, superseded, or replaced in the future with the approval of the responsible
regulatory agency. In addition, any new or additional uses must also be approved and
permitted by all applicable regulatory agencies.
b. The City shall comply with the requirements and restrictions included in the quitclaim
deed transferring each mitigation site.
c. The City shall maintain and pay the cost to maintain each conveyed mitigation site in
perpetuity according to all restrictions and requirements as listed in the quitclaim
deed, listed in documents creating, permitting, or certifying each site, as those
documents exist on the effective date of this agreement or as they may be amended,
superseded, or replaced in the future with the approval of the responsible regulatory
agency, and in a manner complying with any other applicable permits, laws and
regulations pertaining to maintenance and operation of each mitigation site.
d. The City understands and agrees that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will
be monitoring the City’s obligations to maintain, operate and preserve the conveyed
mitigation sites. The Department will notify the Corps when each mitigation site is
conveyed to the City. If the Corps sends a compliance notice to the Department
instead of to the City, the Department will forward the notice to the City. Should the
City of Auburn conduct any activities affecting the conveyed mitigations sites that
Page 4 of 11
DI.H Page 182 of 335
Exhibit A
violate the Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments of 1972 (also known as
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) as defined by CFR 33 Part 326.3, the City of
Auburn will be subject to Regulatory Enforcement by the Corps under Title 33 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 326 Enforcement. If, after the Regulatory
Enforcement process has concluded, the City is not in compliance with Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, the mitigation site permit terms, or any corrective action
approved or required by the Corps, provisions of Section 2.e, below, will be
implemented.
e.
i. The City agrees that should it fail to perpetually use either conveyed
mitigation site to preserve its functions and values as a mitigation site, the
conveyed mitigation site will automatically revert to the ownership of the
State of Washington without cost or further obligation on the part of the
Department.
ii. The City further agrees that should it fail to perpetually maintain and operate
either conveyed mitigation site in a manner that complies with this
Agreement, the quitclaim deed, the Corps, and any documents creating,
permitting, or certifying each mitigation site, as those documents exist on the
effective date of this agreement or as they may be amended, superseded, or
replaced in the future with the approval of the responsible regulatory agencies,
the conveyed mitigation site will automatically revert to the ownership of the
State of Washington without cost or further obligation on the part of the
Department. A failure to so perpetually maintain and operate is established if
it is determined, after conclusion of an administrative process, such as the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Enforcement process, that the
City’s activities are not in compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act or other applicable law.
iii. Should either conveyed mitigation site revert to State ownership under “i” or
“ii” above, the City agrees to quitclaim such mitigation site to the State of
Washington immediately upon request. Should ownership of either or both
mitigation sites revert to the State of Washington, the City will pay any costs
and fees associated with transferring ownership.
f. Should ownership of either or both mitigation sites revert to the State of Washington
under Section 2.e within five years of the City altering the drainage within lands
conveyed under this agreement, then the City will reimburse the Department’s costs
to restore the site and bring it into full compliance with the documents creating,
permitting, or certifying the site; PROVIDED that should the City pay for and obtain
a study prepared by a Department-approved expert that concludes the City’s drainage
alteration was not a cause of the mitigation site non-compliance, then the City is not
obligated to reimburse the Department’s costs.
3. The Department further agrees to convey to the City the approximately 34.04 acres of
non-mitigation and non-right-of-way land contained within the larger State-owned
property described in Exhibit B and depicted in Exhibit C in exchange for the City
Page 5 of 11
DI.H Page 183 of 335
Exhibit A
conveying to the State a fee simple interest in the approximately 9.91 acres of parcel 1-
22952 described in Exhibit H and depicted in Exhibit I, but only on the following terms
and conditions:
a. The Department will reserve a perpetual, non-exclusive drainage easement for storm
and surface water flow and storage over, on, under, and across the transferred
property for the historic and on-going storm and surface water flow or storage caused
by or due to the construction, reconstruction, operation, and/or maintenance of the
adjacent State Route 167 highway, its associated drainage system, and its other
structures, including the Mill Creek conveyance under State Route 167, thus
benefitting the State Route 167 right of way, including the right of ingress and egress
over the transferred property to inspect, and monitor water flow and storage and also
to maintain the 50 foot wide area currently containing a drainage ditch (depicted as a
small dashed rectangle on Exhibit “C”), PROVIDED, that this easement does not
prohibit the City from altering drainage on the described lands, but only if doing so
does not adversely impact the State’s easement, and PROVIDED further that changes
in water flow and storage caused by future Department projects fall within the scope
of this easement to the extent that they are permitted by applicable regulatory
agencies.
b. The City will convey a fee simple interest in its property by quitclaim deed, in a form
prepared by the Department. The State will convey its property by a quitclaim deed
consistent with the statutes authorizing exchange of real property in Chapter 47.12
RCW, in a form prepared by the Department. The Department shall prepare the
necessary deeds within 90 days after this agreement is fully signed. Each Party shall
be responsible for any closing, recording, or filing costs associated with the property
conveyed to that Party. Other than as expressly provided herein, the parties accept
the properties conveyed to them “as is.”
c. Consideration for each Party’s conveyance of real property under this Section 3 will
be (i) receipt of real property from the other Party and (ii) resolution of the lawsuit
referenced above. Consideration for the City’s conveyance also includes the
Department’s payment of $109,700, the difference in the fair market values of the
two parcels being exchanged. The Department agrees to pay this amount within 30
days after the deed from the City to the Department is recorded.
d. The Department agrees to remove the existing City-owned sewer pipe on the property
the City is conveying to the State and to pay the City $2,067,500 as the cost to install
a new sewer line on non-transferred City-owned property that would otherwise be
damaged by that amount by the loss of the sewer line. Prior to advertising for the
removal work, the Department will submit to the City for review and approval, its
plans and specifications for removal and plugging the sewer. Upon project
completion, the Department will provide the City with as built plans in AutoCAD
electronic format and on Mylar. The City will be responsible for installing the new
sewer line when and where it determines necessary, but not on the land conveyed to
the State.
Page 6 of 11
DI.H Page 184 of 335
Exhibit A
e. King County has an interest in and a mitigation site on a portion of parcel 1-22952
(depicted in Exhibit I) not being conveyed to the State. The Department will grant
King County and the City a non-exclusive easement allowing access for necessary
maintenance and monitoring of this existing site. The physical area included within
this easement is shown on Exhibit I.
f. The Department will construct the portion of the access road located on the portion of
parcel 1-22952 being conveyed to the State. The City has constructed the portion of
the road from the eastern edge of the West Valley Highway to the western edge of the
property the City is conveying to the State so as to accommodate an access roadway
aligned with the access easement depicted on Exhibit I and page 2 of Exhibit K. The
Department will construct the connection between the road portions each party has
constructed on the access easement depicted on Exhibit I and page 2 of Exhibit K.
g. The City will grant the Department a Right of Entry, attached hereto as Exhibit K, so
that the Department can connect the access road constructed by the Department to the
portion constructed by the City.
h. If the property exchange takes place before the City completes construction of its
West Valley Highway Improvements – SR18 to West Main Street Project, then the
Department will grant a permit to the City of Auburn to allow staging of construction
equipment and storage of materials for that project during the construction of said
West Valley Highway Improvements. The permit is attached hereto as Exhibit J,
setting forth the terms of and area within the permit. Following the construction of
said West Valley Highway Improvements, the City shall remove any equipment and
materials related to the City’s West Valley Highway construction project from the
construction staging/material storage area. The parties agree that the permit does not
obligate the City to perform future site remediation from past practices prior to the
said West Valley Highway Improvements.
4. The City understands and agrees that for any of the state-owned lands to be conveyed
under this Agreement, the Department shall retain ownership all rights of access, light,
view and air between the state-owned lands conveyed and SR 167. The City further
understands and agrees that the City, its successors and/or assigns shall not have any
rights of ingress or egress (to, from and between) the state-owned lands conveyed and SR
167. The City further understands and agrees that the City and its successors and/or
assigns shall not be entitled to any damages for the loss of access, light, view or air in
connection with any construction, reconstruction, operation or maintenance of SR 167.
This term shall be contained in all conveyance documents to the City.
5. Each Party fully releases and discharges the other from and against any and all claims,
demands, actions, causes of action, obligations, costs, expenses, damages, losses, and
liabilities, of any kind or nature, existing, claimed to exist, or which can hereafter ever arise
out of or result from or in connection with any past, current, or future act, error, or omission
relating to the City’s and the Department’s actions or inactions claimed to affect ALC’s
Page 7 of 11
DI.H Page 185 of 335
Exhibit A
property in any way, the facts alleged in ALC’s previously filed claims for damages, or the
facts alleged in ALC’s lawsuit.
6. Any property conveyed to the City or to the Department under this Agreement shall be
conveyed by quitclaim deed to the City or to the Department on an “as is” “where is” and
“with all faults” basis. Each party hereby waives and relinquishes all rights and
privileges arising out of, or with respect to, any representations, warranties or covenants,
whether express or implied, which may have been made or given, or which may be
deemed to have been made or given, by the other party or its representatives, except for
those representations, warranties and covenants set forth in this Agreement.
Except to the extent of any representations or warranties set forth elsewhere in this
Agreement, each party has not relied upon and will not rely upon, and the other party
expressly disclaims, any representations or warranties with respect to, and shall have no
liability for: (i) the condition of the property or any buildings, structures or improvements
located thereon or the suitability thereof for habitation, occupancy or for the intended use
of the parties or for any use whatsoever; (ii) any applicable building, zoning or fire laws
or regulations or with respect to compliance therewith or with respect to the existence of
or compliance with any required permits, if any, of any governmental agency; (iii) the
availability or existence of any water, sewer or utilities, any rights thereto, or any water,
sewer or utility districts; (iv) access to any public or private sanitary sewer system; (v)
the fact that all or a portion of the property may be located on or near an earthquake fault
line; or (vi) the presence of any hazardous substances in any improvements on the
property, including without limitation asbestos or formaldehyde, or the presence of any
environmentally hazardous wastes or materials on or under the property. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, except to the extent of any representations or
warranties set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, each party shall have no liability to the
other party with respect to the condition of the property under common law, or any
federal, state, or local law or regulation, including but not limited to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 as amended, 42
U.S.C.A. sections 9601 et seq., and the Washington Model Toxics Control Act
(“MTCA”), RCW 70.105d. Each party hereby releases and waives any and all claims
which the party has or may have against the other party under any of the foregoing laws
or with respect to the condition of the property, except to the extent of any claims the
party may have arising from any express representations, warranties or covenants of the
other party under this Agreement. Each party acknowledges to the other party that it has
been given the opportunity under this Agreement to fully inspect the property and each
party assumes the responsibility and risks of all defects and conditions, including such
defects and conditions, if any, that cannot be observed by casual inspection, subject to the
exception of rights expressly set forth above.
7. Once fully executed, this Agreement binds the Parties until all terms and conditions are
met and until each Party has conveyed the property it has agreed to convey. But the
City’s obligations regarding maintenance of conveyed mitigations sites, as set forth in
Section 2 and elsewhere in this Agreement, is perpetual and shall not terminate unless the
sites have reverted back to State ownership in accordance with paragraph 2.e.
Page 8 of 11
DI.H Page 186 of 335
Exhibit A
8. The entire Agreement between the Parties hereto is contained in this Agreement and the
Exhibits hereto; and this Agreement supersedes all previous representations, negotiations,
understandings, or agreements, written and oral, with respect to ALC’s claims against the
Parties and with respect to the properties described in Exhibits A, B, C-1, C-2, C-3, and
H. No modification, termination or amendment of this Agreement may be made except
by written agreement signed by those authorized to bind the Parties subsequent to the
date of this Agreement, unless otherwise provided herein.
9. No failure by either Party to insist upon the strict performance of any covenant, duty,
agreement, or condition of this Agreement or to exercise any right or remedy consequent
upon a breach thereof shall constitute a waiver of any such breach or any other covenant,
agreement, term or condition. Either Party hereto, by notice, and only by notice as
provided herein may, but shall be under no obligation to, waive any of its rights or any
conditions to its obligations hereunder, or any duty, obligation or covenant of the other
Party hereto. But neither Party can waive the City’s obligations under Section 2; the City
defaults by violating any of those obligations, and title to the conveyed mitigation site
shall automatically revert to the State of Washington.
10. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each such
counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all such counterparts
together shall constitute but one agreement. Signatures transmitted by email or facsimile
shall be deemed originals.
11. Each of the provisions of this Agreement has been reviewed and negotiated, and
represent the combined work product of the Parties hereto. No presumption or other
rules of construction which would interpret the provisions of this Agreement in favor of
or against the Party preparing the same shall be applicable in connection with the
construction or interpretation of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
12. This Agreement and the right of the Parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the Parties agree that in any
such action, venue shall lie exclusively in Thurston County, Washington. In the event of
any controversy, claim, or dispute arising out of this Agreement, each Party shall be
solely responsible for the payment of its own legal expenses, including but not limited to,
attorneys’ fees and costs.
13. No Party to this Agreement shall transfer or assign any right or obligation hereunder
without the prior written consent of the other Party.
14. Summary of Exhibits: The following Exhibits are incorporated into this Agreement:
Exhibit A Legal description of former Auburn Land Company property
Exhibit B Legal Description of State Owned Property, including property to be
conveyed to the City and property to be retained by the State
Page 9 of 11
DI.H Page 187 of 335
Exhibit A
Exhibit C Graphic Illustrating State Owned Property, including property to be
retained as right of way, mitigation sites to be conveyed, and non-mitigation property to
be conveyed
Exhibit C-1 Legal description of 8.71 Acre mitigation site
Exhibit C-2 Legal description of 5.49 Acre mitigation site
Exhibit C-3 Legal description of 34.04 Acre surplus property
Exhibit D Agreements dismissing Auburn Land Company’s lawsuit and releasing its
claims
Exhibit E Recorded Drainage Easement granted by City to State over former Auburn
Land Company Property
Exhibit F Sample Quitclaim Deed conveying State mitigation sites to the City and
reserving easements
Exhibit G Purchase & Sale Agreement by which City purchased Property from
Auburn Land Company
Exhibit H Legal Description for Property State is acquiring from City
Exhibit I Department Sundry Site Plan depicting Department Parcel Number 1-
22952, including the portion to be acquired by State from the City
Exhibit J Department Permit authorizing City’s temporary use of portion of land
City is transferring to State during City’s West Valley Highway Project
Exhibit K Right of Entry granted to Department by City
15. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this
Agreement shall be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to a Party
pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement shall be given by personal delivery or by
depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to such Party, postage prepaid,
regular and certified mail, with return receipt requested, at the addresses set forth below.
Such notices, demands or requests may also be transmitted via facsimile, provided that
the provisions of this section are otherwise complied with. All notices, demands and
requests shall be deemed effective and received upon the earlier of actual receipt, whether
served by personal delivery or by certified United States mail, return receipt requested, or
three (3) days after depositing the same into the mail, as established by the postmark date.
By giving to the other Party at least three (3) business days’ written notice thereof, the
Parties hereto and their respective authorized successors and assigns shall have the right
from time to time at any time during the term of this Agreement to change their
respective addresses and each shall have the right to specify as its address any other
Page 10 of 11
DI.H Page 188 of 335
Exhibit A
Page 11 of 11
address within the United States. The present addresses for notice are as follows, and the
Parties also agree to accept service of process at said addresses:
DEPARTMENT:
Department of Transportation
Attn: Northwest Region Real Estate Services Manager
15700 Dayton Avenue North
P.O. Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
CITY:
City of Auburn
Attn: ___________________
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4916
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year last written below.
CITY DEPARTMENT
_______________________________ _________________________________
By: Peter B. Lewis By: John L. Jensen
Its: Mayor Its: NWR Real Estate Services Manager
Date: __________________________ Date: ____________________________
DI.H Page 189 of 335
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description for King County Tax Parcel No. 1221049009, commonly identified as 801
15th Street Northwest, Auburn, WA 98002:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North,
Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying west of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban
Railway, as established by instruments recorded under Auditor’s File Nos. 214685 and 220487.
EXCEPT that portion appropriated by the State of Washington under Stipulated Judgment and
Decree of Appropriation in King County Superior Court No. 718093 on November 24, 1971.
DI.H Page 190 of 335
EXHIBIT B – page 1
EXHIBIT B
Legal description for the State environmental mitigation and right-of-way
expansion land located west of SR 167, east of West Valley Highway,
and south of 15th Street NW in or near Auburn, Washington
PARCEL "A":
The southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East,
W. M., in King County Washington;
EXCEPT portion conveyed to King County for State Aid Road No. 69 (West Valley Highway)
by deed recorded under Recording Number 694367, in King County, Washington;
AND EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Cause Number 718093
for SR 167;
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn for street purposes by deed recorded
under Recording Number 6310375.
PARCEL "B":
The northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East,
W.M. in King County Washington:
EXCEPT that part of the west 550 feet lying northerly of the s outh 615 feet:
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for State Aid Road No. 69 (West
Valley Highway) by deed recorded under Recording Number 694383;
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn for street purposes by deed recorded
under Recording Number 6310375;
AND EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Cause Number 7l8093
for SR 167;
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn by deed recorded under Recording
Number 8112230547.
PARCEL "C":
That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 11, Township 21 North,
Range 4 East, W. M., in King County, Washington, lying easterly of the easterly margin of SR
181 (West Valley Highway);
EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Cause Number 718093.
DI.H Page 191 of 335
EXHIBIT B – page 2
PARCEL "D":
That part of the west 550.00 feet lying northerly of the south 615. 00 feet of the northwest
quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King
County, Washington;
EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for State Aid Road No. 69 (West Valley
Highway) by deed recorded under Recording Number 694383;
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn for street purposes by deed recorded
under Recording Number 6310375;
AND EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Cause Number 718093
for SR 167;
AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn by deed recorded under Recording
Number 8112230547.
DI.H Page 192 of 335
DATE
SR 167 KING COUNTY
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON STATE
EXHIBIT C
PARCEL 1-15619
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
+
+
(10.05 ACRES)
FUTURE HIGHWAY PROJECTS
BY WSDOT FOR
AREA TO BE RETAINED
W
E
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
IG
H
W
A
Y
15th STREET NW
S
R
1
6
7
RESERVED)
(DRAINAGE EASEMENT
5.49 ACRES
MITIGATION SITE
WSDOT
RESERVED)
(DRAINAGE EASEMENT
8.71 ACRES
MITIGATION SITE
WSDOT
RESERVED)
(DRAINAGE EASEMENT
34.04 ACRES
TO CITY OF AUBURN
AREA TO BE CONVEYED
EXHIBIT C2
SEE
DESCRIPTION,
FOR LEGAL
SEE EXHIBIT C3
DESCRIPTION,
FOR LEGAL
SEE EXHIBIT C1
DESCRIPTION,
FOR LEGAL
DI.H Page 193 of 335
EXHIBIT C-1
Legal Description of the approximately 8.71 acre (379,408 sf) certified mitigation site, ICN
1-17-09477 (southwest parcel; sheet 6)
Those portions of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 11, and the southwest
quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, all in Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in
King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the east margin of the West Valley Highway and the south line
of said Section 11; thence northeasterly and northerly along the east margin of said West Valley
Highway to a point opposite Highway Engineer's Station (hereinafter referred to as HES) 579+17
on the SR 167 line survey of SR 167, Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., and 1,182± feet
westerly therefrom; thence easterly to a point opposite HES 579+12 on said line survey and
1,013 feet westerly therefrom; thence easterly to a point opposite HES 579+01 on said line
survey and 574 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES 578+47 on
said line survey and 580 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES
577+39 on said line survey and 592 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite
HES 576+29 on said line survey and 599 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point
opposite HES 575+13 on said line survey and 600 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a
point opposite HES 574+04 on said line survey and 592 feet westerly therefrom; thence
southerly to a point opposite HES 572+91 on said line survey and 574 feet westerly therefrom;
thence southerly to a point opposite HES 571+72 on said line survey and 575± feet westerly
therefrom, said point lying on the south line of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of
said Section 12; thence westerly along said south line to the corner common to Sections 11, 12,
13, and 14, T. 21 N, R.4E, WM; then westerly along the south line of said Section 11 to the point
of beginning;
EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Halvard Thurmod and Pearl V. Thurmod, under King County
Recording No. 6722632.
The lands herein described contain an area of 379,408 square feet, more or less, the specific
details concerning all of which are to be found on sheet 6 of that certain plan entitled SR 167,
Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., now of record and on file in the office of the Secretary of
Transportation at Olympia, and bearing date of approval June 12, 1969, as revised
DI.H Page 194 of 335
EXHIBIT C-2
Legal Description of the approximately 5.49 acre (239,145 sf) uncertified mitigation site,
ICN 1-17-09476 (middle/west parcel; sheet 6)
Those portions of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter and the northwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County,
Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the easterly margin of West Valley Highway opposite Highway
Engineer's Station (hereinafter referred to as HES) 579+17 on the SR 167 line survey of SR 167,
Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., and 1,182± feet westerly therefrom; thence easterly to a
point opposite HES 579+12 on said line survey and 1,013 feet westerly therefrom; thence
northerly to a point opposite HES 580+21 on said line survey and 1,021 feet westerly therefrom;
thence easterly to a point opposite HES 580+12 on said line survey and 763 feet westerly
therefrom; thence northerly parallel with said SR 167 line survey to a point opposite HES
581+68 thereon; thence northwesterly to a point opposite HES 583+29 on said line survey and
917 feet westerly therefrom; thence northerly to a point opposite HES 585+49 on said line
survey and 916 feet westerly therefrom; thence northeasterly to a point opposite HES 585+97 on
said line survey and 802 feet westerly therefrom; thence northwesterly to a point opposite HES
587+01 on said line survey and 860 feet westerly therefrom; thence southwesterly to a point
opposite HES 586+37 on said line survey and 1,188 feet westerly therefrom, said point being on
the easterly margin of the West Valley Highway; thence southerly along said easterly margin to
the point of beginning.
The lands herein described contain an area of 239,145 square feet, more or less, the specific
details concerning all of which are to be found on sheet 6 of that certain plan entitled SR 167,
Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., now of record and on file in the office of the Secretary of
Transportation at Olympia, and bearing date of approval June 12, 1969, as revised.
DI.H Page 195 of 335
EXHIBIT C-3
Legal Description of the approximately 34.04 acre (1,482,783 sf) surplus State property,
ICN 1-17-08645 (east/north parcel; on sheets 6 and 7)
Those portions of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter and the northwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County,
Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the easterly margin of West Valley Highway opposite Highway
Engineer's Station (hereinafter referred to as HES) 579+17 on the SR 167 line survey of SR 167,
Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., and 1,182± feet westerly therefrom; thence easterly to a
point opposite HES 579+12 on said SR 167 line survey and 1,013 feet westerly therefrom, said
point being the True Point of Beginning; thence easterly to a point opposite HES 579+01 on said
SR 167 line survey and 574 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES
578+47 on said SR 167 line survey and 580 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point
opposite HES 577+39 on said SR 167 line survey and 592 feet westerly therefrom; thence
southerly to a point opposite HES 576+29 on said SR 167 line survey and 599 feet westerly
therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES 575+13 on said SR 167 line survey and 600
feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES 574+04 on said SR 167 line
survey and 592 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite HES 572+91 on
said SR 167 line survey and 574 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to a point opposite
HES 571+72 on said SR 167 line survey and 575± feet westerly therefrom, said point lying on
the south line of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 12; thence
easterly along said south line to the westerly right of way line of SR 167, said point being
opposite HES 572+13.85 on said SR 167 line survey and 165 feet westerly therefrom; thence
northerly along said westerly right of way line to a point opposite HES 583+00 on said SR 167
line survey and 165 feet westerly therefrom; thence northwesterly to a point opposite HES
587+00 on said SR 167 line survey and 215 feet westerly therefrom; thence northwesterly to a
point opposite HES 592+00 on said SR 167 line survey and 455 feet westerly therefrom; thence
northwesterly to a point opposite HES (15th St. NW)5+50 on the 15th St. N.W. Ext. line survey
of said Highway and 370 feet southerly therefrom; thence northwesterly to a point opposite HES
(15th St. NW)1+37± on said 15th St. N.W. Ext. line survey and 192.32 feet southerly therefrom,
said point lying on the easterly margin of the West Valley Highway; thence southerly along said
easterly margin to a point opposite HES 586+37 on the SR 167 line survey of said Highway and
1,188 feet westerly therefrom; thence northeasterly to a point opposite HES 587+01 on said SR
167 line survey and 860 feet westerly therefrom; thence southeasterly to a point opposite HES
585+97 on said SR 167 line survey and 802 feet westerly therefrom; thence southwesterly to a
point opposite HES 585+49 on said SR 167 line survey and 916 feet westerly therefrom; thence
southerly to a point opposite HES 583+29 on said SR 167 line survey and 917 feet westerly
therefrom; thence southeasterly to a point opposite HES 581+68 on said SR 167 line survey and
763 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly parallel with said SR 167 line survey to a point
opposite HES 580+12 thereon; thence westerly to a point opposite HES 580+21 on said SR 167
line survey and 1,021 feet westerly therefrom; thence southerly to the True Point of Beginning.
Exhibit C-3 – page 1 DI.H Page 196 of 335
Exhibit C-3 – page 2
The lands herein described contain an area of 1,482,783 square feet, more or less, the specific
details concerning all of which are to be found on sheets 6 and 7 of that certain plan entitled SR
167, Auburn: 17th St. SW to S. 285th St., now of record and on file in the office of the Secretary
of Transportation at Olympia, and bearing date of approval June 12, 1969, as revised.
DI.H Page 197 of 335
DI.H Page 198 of 335
DI.H Page 199 of 335
DI.H Page 200 of 335
DI.H Page 201 of 335
DI.H Page 202 of 335
DI.H Page 203 of 335
DI.H Page 204 of 335
DI.H Page 205 of 335
DI.H Page 206 of 335
DI.H Page 207 of 335
DI.H Page 208 of 335
DI.H Page 209 of 335
DI.H Page 210 of 335
DI.H Page 211 of 335
DI.H Page 212 of 335
DI.H Page 213 of 335
DI.H Page 214 of 335
DI.H Page 215 of 335
DI.H Page 216 of 335
DI.H Page 217 of 335
DI.H Page 218 of 335
DI.H Page 219 of 335
DI.H Page 220 of 335
DI.H Page 221 of 335
DI.H Page 222 of 335
DI.H Page 223 of 335
DI.H Page 224 of 335
DI.H Page 225 of 335
DI.H Page 226 of 335
DI.H Page 227 of 335
EXHIBIT H
King County Sundry Site Plans,
Mill Creek Floodplain Storage and Wetlands Mitigation Area
All that portion of the southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 21 North, Range 4 East,
W.M., King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said
Section 14; thence North 89°57'08" West 969.29 feet to the easterly margin of West Valley
Highway; thence South 12°53'25" West along said easterly margin 142.99 feet; thence
continue southerly along the said easterly margin along the arc of a curve to the right
having a radius of 2,895 feet an arc distance of 324.05 feet, said point being on the
southerly boundary line of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement recorded under
Recording No. 8109100300; thence South 85°40'28" East along the southerly boundary
line of said sanitary sewer easement 99.23 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence
continuing South 85°40'28" East 383.32 feet; thence South 22°12'39" West 104.36 feet;
thence South 25º58'40" East 52.84 feet; thence South 43º20'08" West 198.65 feet; thence
South 27º37'28" West 54.44 feet; thence South 58º04'28" East 195.33 feet; thence
southwesterly along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 50 feet, an arc
distance of 10.40 feet; thence South 35º40'35" West 384.02 feet; thence southwesterly
along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 350 feet, an arc distance of 391.75
feet; thence North 80º11'35" West 115.63 feet; thence South 09º48'25" West 12.15 feet;
thence North 69º41'20" West 61.88 feet; thence North 16º34'03" East 278.65 feet; thence
North 23º29'46" East 227.32 feet; thence North 21º53'56" East 150.55 feet; thence North
12º55'06" East 91.65 feet; thence North 38º44'24" East 163.99 feet; thence North 21º46'10"
East 74.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
The lands herein described contain an area of 431,858 square feet, more or less, the
specific details concerning all of which are to be found on sheet 69 of that certain plan
entitled King County Sundry Site Plans, Mill Creek Floodplain Storage and Wetlands
Mitigation Area, now of record and on file in the office of the Secretary of Transportation
at Olympia, bearing date of approval August 6, 2009, revised May 3, 2012.
DI.H Page 228 of 335
DI.H Page 229 of 335
DI.H Page 230 of 335
DI.H Page 231 of 335
DI.H Page 232 of 335
DI.H Page 233 of 335
DI.H Page 234 of 335
DI.H Page 235 of 335
DI.H Page 236 of 335
DI.H Page 237 of 335
DI.H Page 238 of 335
DI.H Page 239 of 335
DI.H Page 240 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Auburn Way South & M Street SE Intersection
Improvements
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Memo
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached memo.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Para
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.J
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.J Page 241 of 335
Page 1 of 1
Memorandum
Engineering Division
To: Public Works Committee, Mayor Lewis
From: Pablo Para
CC: Dennis Dowdy, Dennis Selle, Ingrid Gaub, Kim Troung,
CP1024 Project File
Date: July 6, 2012
Re: Auburn Way South & M St SE Intersection Improvements TIP#20
Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to update the Public Works Committee regarding project status of the
Auburn Way South (AWS) & M St SE intersection improvements.
Background
Over the past two years staff has been analyzing the intersection of AWS & M St SE. Staff has
implemented several safety improvements including adding protective left turn phasing on Auburn Way
South, restricting turning movements at the intersection of 17th St SE and M St SE, and improving lane
use control signage. Three proposed intersection improvement options were presented to the Public
Works Committee (PWC) in October 2011 where the committee selected Option 2.
Staff moved forward with the pre-design, identified estimated right of way (ROW) needs, construction
costs, utility impacts, and began looking for potential grant funding sources. Staff plans to proceed with a
consultant contract to complete final design and ROW acquisition by the end of 2013. With design and
ROW completed the project will be a better position to compete for potential grant funding.
Estimated Project Costs
Design & Permitting: $150,000
Right of Way: $100,000 (+/-2000 sq. ft. from three parcels)
Construction: $450,000 (funding unsecured)
DI.J Page 242 of 335
Page 2 of 2
Existing Conditions
Below is a plan view of the existing intersection alignment.
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE
Existing ConditionExisting ConditionExisting ConditionExisting Condition
Auburn Way South and M St SE is an intersection of two Principle Arterials bisected by 17th St SE, a
minor arterial. This is one of the busiest and most congested intersections in the city causing significant
backups and delays. The close proximity to 17th St SE presents additional operational and safety concerns.
DI.J Page 243 of 335
Page 3 of 3
Option 2: PWC Selected this option in October 2011.
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
"M" ST SE
17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE17TH ST SE
Option 2Option 2Option 2Option 2
Adds northwest bound right turn pocket.
Realigns westbound 17th St SE intersection.
DI.J Page 244 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
2013 - 2018 Transportation Improvement Program Annual
Update
Date:
July 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Memo
Draft 2013-2018 TIP
Project List
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Para
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.K
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.K Page 245 of 335
PCDC Page 1 7/10/2012
Memorandum
Engineering Division
To: Public Works Committee (PWC),
Mayor Lewis
From: Pablo Para, Traffic Engineer
CC: Dennis Dowdy, Dennis Selle, Ingrid Gaub, Martin Chaw, Consuelo Rogel
Date: July 6, 2012
Re: 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program Update
PURPOSE
Discuss proposed 2013-2018 update to the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
BACKGROUND
The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required to be amended
annually as required by RCW 35.77.010. For Auburn, the primary importance of the TIP
is that, in most instances, projects must be included on the TIP to be eligible for state
and federal grant programs. The TIP identifies secured or reasonably expected
revenues and expenditures for each of the projects included in the TIP. Typically,
projects listed in the first three years of the document are shown as having secured
funding while projects in the last three years can be partially or completely unfunded.
The TIP is a multiyear planning tool and document for the development of transportation
facilities within the City and does not represent a financial commitment by the City.
Once the TIP is approved, projects are budgeted and funded through the City’s biennial
budget. The TIP sets priorities for the acquisition of project funding and is a prerequisite
of most grant programs. Staff also uses the TIP to coordinate future transportation
projects with needed utility improvements.
DI.K Page 246 of 335
PCDC Page 2 7/10/2012
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 2013-2018 TIP
Deletions: The following projects are proposed to be removed from the TIP. TIP#’s
61, and 64-66 will be added to the Comprehensive Transportation Plan’s Group B
projects:
TIP #14 West valley Highway Improvements
TIP #25 F St SE & 4th St SE traffic Signal
TIP #33 Traffic Calming Improvements
TIP #52 Downtown Promenade Improvements
TIP #53 37th & R St SE Pedestrian Connector
TIP #55 Mary Olson Farm Improvements
TIP #57 Downtown Pedestrian Lighting
TIP #61 Auburn Way South Bypass
TIP #64 Lea Hill Road Segment 1 (R St NE to 104th Ave SE)
TIP #65 Lea Hill Road Segment 2 (104th Ave Se to 112th Ave SE)
TIP #66 Lea Hill Road Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE)
Additions: Below are the proposed new projects to the 2013-2018 TIP:
TIP #22 West Valley Highway System Improvements
TIP #43 Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety Improvements
TIP #67 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Project
NEXT STEPS
Staff will commence the TIP amendment process based on the below schedule. The
final approved TIP document will be sent to WSDOT and PSRC for their acceptance.
July 23, 2012 – 2nd PCDC Review of Draft TIP and action on Resolution to set
public hearing.
Aug 6, 2012 – 2nd Review of Draft TIP at PWC.
Aug 13, 2012 – Final PCDC Review of TIP and action on Resolution for adoption.
Aug 20, 2012 – City Council Meeting to conduct public hearing & approve
amended TIP.
Attachments:
• Draft 2013-2018 TIP
• Draft 2013-2018 TIP Summary Spreadsheet
DI.K Page 247 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn IImmpprroovveemmeenntt
PPrrooggrraamm
22001133--22001188
Approved by Auburn City Council
August 20, 2012
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001
(253)-931-3010
www.auburnwa.gov
DI.K Page 248 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
ii
Cover Photos: XXXXXXXXXXX
DI.K Page 249 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
iii
RESOLUTION NO. 4839
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2013-2018 TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO R.C.W.
CHAPTER 35.77 OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City prepare and
adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the ensuing six years,
but only after conducting a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 20 13-2018 Transportation Improvement
Program for the City of Auburn was held on August 20, 2012 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant to notice published in the legal newspaper
of the City of Auburn on August XX, 2012; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit “A,” the terms of
which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully se t forth, a designation of the
streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be improved in the manner therein
set forth during the year set for the improvement of such street or streets.
Section 2. That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is hereby directed to forward a
certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department of Transportation for filing
not more than thirty (30) days after the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 3. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation.
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and
signatures hereon.
DI.K Page 250 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
iv
DATED this ___ day of August, 2012
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.K Page 251 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
v
Transportation Improvement Program
2013-2018
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1
Projects & Financing Plan Summary ..................................................................................................... 3
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary .................................................................................. 13
Roadway Improvement Projects ........................................................................................................... 15
A Street NW, Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................... 15
AWS Ped Improvements Dogwood to Fir ............................................................................................ 16
Auburn Way Corridor Imp.................................................................................................................... 17
I Street NE Corridor .............................................................................................................................. 18
M Street Grade Separation .................................................................................................................... 19
South 277th Street ................................................................................................................................. 20
15th Street SW Reconstruction ............................................................................................................. 21
A Street NW, Phase 2 ........................................................................................................................... 22
D Street NW .......................................................................................................................................... 23
F Street SE ............................................................................................................................................ 24
M Street NE .......................................................................................................................................... 25
BNSF Railyard Grade Crossing ............................................................................................................ 26
West Valley Highway Imp.................................................................................................................... 27
8th Street NE Widening ........................................................................................................................ 27
49th Street NE ....................................................................................................................................... 28
Traffic Calming Improvements............................................................................................................. 29
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 3.................................................................................................... 29
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 1.................................................................................................... 30
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 2.................................................................................................... 31
SE 320th Street Corridor Imp. .............................................................................................................. 32
Downtown Promenade Imp. ................................................................................................................. 33
Downtown Pedestrian Lighting ............................................................................................................ 34
AWS Corridor Improvements Fir to Hemlock ..................................................................................... 34
M ST SE Corridor ................................................................................................................................. 35
Auburn Way South Bypass ................................................................................................................... 36
Auburn Way South Streetscape ............................................................................................................ 36
Harvey Rd. & 8th Street NE Imp. ......................................................................................................... 37
8th Street NE & R ST NE (104th Ave SE U-turn) ................................................................................ 38
Auburn Way North & 1st Street NE ..................................................................................................... 39
Auburn Way South & M Street SE ....................................................................................................... 40
C Street NW & West Main Street ......................................................................................................... 41
Traffic Signal Improvements ................................................................................................................ 42
F Street SE & 4th Street SE .................................................................................................................. 43
DI.K Page 252 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
vi
Railroad Crossing Imp. ......................................................................................................................... 43
Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Dr SE ............................................................................................... 44
ITS Dynamic Message Signs ................................................................................................................ 44
East Valley HWY ITS Expansion......................................................................................................... 45
29th St SE & R St SE ............................................................................................................................. 47
BNSF/ East Valley HWY Ped. Underpass ........................................................................................... 49
Academy Drive Class 1 Trail ................................................................................................................ 50
Metro Shuttles ....................................................................................................................................... 51
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program. ............................................................................................... 52
Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Imp. ........................................................................................... 53
Citywide Sidewalk Improvements ........................................................................................................ 54
A St NE Ped. Imp.................................................................................................................................. 55
Interurban Trailhead Imp. ..................................................................................................................... 56
Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements ..................................................................................... 57
Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous Projects ............................................................................ 59
Mohawk Plastics Site Mitigation .......................................................................................................... 59
41st Street SE & A St SE Access Study ............................................................................................... 60
S 277th St Wetland Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 61
104th Ave SE & Green River Rd Study ............................................................................................... 62
Environmental Park Study .................................................................................................................... 63
Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Study .................................................................................... 64
S 316th Bike and Ped Study.................................................................................................................. 65
Kersey Way SE Study ........................................................................................................................... 66
Roadway Preservation Projects ............................................................................................................. 68
Annual Bridge Preservation Project ...................................................................................................... 68
Annual Arterial Street Preservation ...................................................................................................... 69
Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program .................................................................................................... 70
Local Street Imp. Program (SOS) ......................................................................................................... 71
Project Summary Spreadsheet .…………………………….……………………………….Appendix A
2012-2017 TIP Project Map…..…………..………………………………………………….Appendix B
DI.K Page 253 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary & Introduction 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 6-year plan for transportation improvements that
supports the City of Auburns current and future growth. The TIP along with the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan (CTP) serve as source documents for the City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
which is a Comprehensive Plan element required by Washington’s Growth Management Act. The
program may be revised at any time by a majority of the City Council after a public hearing.
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The purpose of the TIP is to identify priority transportation projects and assure that the city has
advanced plans as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program. There are always more
projects than available revenues. Therefore, a primary objective of the TIP is to integrate the two to
produce a comprehensive, realistic program for the orderly development and maintenance of our street
system. Projects are required to be included in the TIP in order to be eligible for state and federal grants.
Grant funding for projects listed may not yet be secured.
Statutory Requirements
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program - RCW 35.77.010 requires that each city prepare and
adopt a comprehensive transportation improvement program for the ensuing six calendar years
consistent with its CTP. This six-year TIP shall be filed with the Secretary of the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) each year within 30 days of adoption.
Projects of Regional Significance - RCW 35.77.010 also requires each city to specifically set forth those
projects and programs of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation improvement program
for that region. The 2013-2018 TIP includes six projects of regional significance:
TIP Project Number Project Title
TIP #1 A St NW, Phase 1
TIP #5 M Street Grade Separation
TIP # 6 S 277th St Widening
TIP #50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs
TIP #51 East Valley Highway ITS Expansion
TIP #58 AWS Corridor Improvements
DI.K Page 254 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary & Introduction 2
Methodology
Annual updates of the TIP begins with developing a revenue forecast to provide a reasonable estimate of
funding available to accomplish the transportation improvement needs. Since the desire to construct
transportation improvements typically exceeds the available forecast revenue, it is necessary to establish
some method of prioritizing the needs.
Transportation needs are identified by examining the latest information concerning level of service,
safety and accident history, growth trends, traffic studies and the City’s adopted CTP. The likelihood of
receiving federal or state grants for various improvements, community interests and values are also
considered. All of these factors yield a prioritized list of transportation improvements.
Projects are placed into one of the following categories;
Roadway Improvements
Intersection, Signal & Intelligent Transportation System Improvements
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvements
Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous Projects
Roadway Preservation Projects.
Each project is identified as a Capacity or Non-capacity improvement and those that lay within the limits
of a defined Arterial LOS Corridor per with Table 2-2 of the City’s CTP are identified accordingly.
Capacity projects from the 6-year plan are incorporated into the CTP as Group A projects. Longer term
capacity projects are listed in the CPT as Group B Projects.
Detailed project costs and funding sources are identified and provided for each project listed in the
proposed TIP. The prioritized list is then financially constrained in the first three years to reflect the
financial projections to yield the six-year Transportation Improvement Program. After completing all
reviews and compiling the document staff makes final recommendations to the Planning and
Community Development Committee and City Council for approval.
DI.K Page 255 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 3
Projects & Financing Plan Summary
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects
1 'A' Street NW, Phase 1 ($8.2M Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000
2 Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements ($192K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 748,830 - - - - - 748,830
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 43,500 - - - - - 43,500
Grants (Fed,State,Local)705,330 - - - - - 705,330
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
3 Auburn Way Corridor Improvements (4th NE to 4th SE)
Capital Costs - - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 110,000 600,000 710,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
4 'I' Street NE Corridor ($162K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs - - - - - 6,760,000 6,760,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000 5,760,000
5 'M' Street Grade Separation ($15.3M Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 6,729,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 7,254,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)3,664,485 - - - - - 3,664,485
Traffic Impact Fees 15,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 540,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - -
PWTF Loan 1,800,115 - - - - - 1,800,115
Other (Agencies)1,249,400 - - - - - 1,249,400
6 South 277th - Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge ($122K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 1,024,300 1,453,000 5,170,000 - - - 7,647,300
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 156,600 - - - - - 156,600
Grants (Fed,State,Local)867,700 153,000 3,879,300 - - - 4,900,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 290,700 - - - 290,700
Other (Development)- 1,300,000 1,000,000 - - - 2,300,000
7 15th St SW Reconstruction
Capital Costs - - - 375,000 3,000,000 - 3,375,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 75,000 500,000 - 575,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 300,000 2,500,000 - 2,800,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
DI.K Page 256 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 4
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Continued)
8 A Street NW, Phase 2 ($150K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs:- - 150,000 - 3,000,000 - 3,150,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 150,000 - - - 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
9 'D' Street NW, 37th to 44th ($6M 2018)
Capital Costs - - - - - 300,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 250,000 250,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 50,000 50,000
10 'F' Street SE, 4th to AWS ($8K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs - - 250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000
11 'M' Street NE, E. Main to 4th
Capital Costs - 50,000 275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000
Traffic Impact Fees - 50,000 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000
12 Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard ($31M beyond 2018)
Capital Costs - - - - - 1,125,000 1,125,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - - - 1,125,000 1,125,000
15 8th Street NE Widening (Pike Street to R Street NE)
Capital Costs - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000
16 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street NE
Capital Costs - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - 850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000
39 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3
Capital Costs - - - 100,000 750,000 - 850,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 85,000 650,000 - 735,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 15,000 100,000 - 115,000
DI.K Page 257 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 5
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Continued)
40 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1
Capital Costs 50,000 150,000 1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 25,000 185,000 - - - 260,000
41 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2
Capital Costs - - 50,000 200,000 1,000,000 - 1,250,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 150,000 865,000 - 1,015,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 50,000 135,000 - 235,000
42 SE 320th St Corridor Improvements
Capital Costs - - 50,000 60,000 580,000 - 690,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 47,500 502,000 - 549,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 12,500 78,000 - 140,500
43 Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor safety Improvements
Capital Costs 250,000 2,083,108 - - - - 2,333,108
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)250,000 2,083,108 - - - - 2,333,108
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
58 Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements Fir to Hemlock ($702K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 2,331,947 - - - - - 2,331,947
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,865,558 - - - - - 1,865,558
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Muckleshoot)466,389 - - - - - 466,389
59 Auburn Ave & 3rd ST NE Pedestrian & Access Improvements
Capital Costs 15,000 200,000 700,500 - - - 915,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 3,000 40,000 140,100 - - - 183,100
Grants (Fed,State,Local)12,000 160,000 560,400 - - - 732,400
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
60 M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)
Capital Costs - - - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 250,000 250,000 - 500,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000
DI.K Page 258 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 6
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Continued)
62 Auburn Way South Streetscape Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 1,200,000 2,050,000 - 3,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
REET2 - - - 550,000 550,000 - 1,100,000
Subtotal, Roadway Improvement Projects:
Capital Costs 11,174,077 4,066,108 10,150,500 11,640,000 16,828,700 11,315,000 65,174,385
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 203,100 40,000 290,100 525,000 1,060,000 600,000 2,718,200
Grants 7,365,073 2,521,108 6,789,700 6,507,500 14,025,700 3,650,000 40,859,081
Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 205,000 1,220,700 1,557,500 1,193,000 180,000 4,446,200
Other (Other Agencies)1,249,400 - - - - - 1,249,400
Other (Development)- 1,300,000 1,850,000 2,500,000 - 6,885,000 12,535,000
Other (Muckleshoot Tribe)466,389 - - - - - 466,389
PWTF 1,800,115 - - - - - 1,800,115
REET2 - - - 550,000 550,000 - 1,100,000
Total Funding 11,174,077 4,066,108 10,150,500 11,640,000 16,828,700 11,315,000 65,174,385
DI.K Page 259 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 7
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Intersection, Signal & ITS Improvement Projects
17 Harvey Road & 8th St NE Imp. ($2M Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000
18 8th St NE & 104th St NE Intersection Improvements ($159K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 233,400 - - - - - 233,400
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 148,400 - - - - - 148,400
Grants (Federal)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
REET2 75,000 - - - - - 75,000
Other (Redflex)10,000 - - - - - 10,000
19 Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improvements
Capital Costs - 50,000 - 550,000 - - 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 - 125,000 - - 175,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 425,000 - - 425,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
20 Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Improvements ($100K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 150,000 450,000 - - - - 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Federal)- 450,000 - - - - 450,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
21 C Street NW and West Main Street
Capital Costs - 100,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 20,000 - - - - 20,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- 80,000 800,000 - - - 880,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 200,000 - - - 200,000
34 Traffic Signal Improvements
Capital Costs 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
REET2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
38 Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs ($880K beyond 2016)
Capital Costs - - 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - 190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
DI.K Page 260 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 8
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Intersection, Signal & ITS Improvement Projects (Continued)
51 East Valley Highway ITS Expansion
Capital Costs - - 800,000 - - - 800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants - - 692,000 - - - 692,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 108,000 - - - 108,000
63 29th Street SE & R Street SE
Capital Costs - - - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - 850,000 850,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 500,000 500,000
REET2 - - - - - 450,000 450,000
67 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Project
Capital Costs 405,000 - - - - - 405,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)400,000 - - - - - 400,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Subtotal, Intersection, Signal & ITS Imp. Projects:
Capital Costs 1,050,300 861,500 2,281,000 2,010,600 2,280,200 2,059,800 10,543,400
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 153,400 70,000 30,000 225,000 180,000 - 658,400
Grants (Fed, State, Local)400,000 530,000 1,682,000 1,525,000 1,840,000 850,000 6,827,000
Traffic Impact Fees 86,900 86,500 394,000 85,600 85,200 584,800 1,323,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
REET2 250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 625,000 1,575,000
Other (Redflex)10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Total Funding 1,050,300 861,500 2,281,000 2,010,600 2,280,200 2,059,800 10,543,400
DI.K Page 261 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 9
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP:Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects
23 BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass ($224K Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs - - - - 4,800,000 5,000,000 9,800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - 4,550,000 5,000,000 9,550,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Other Agencies)- - - - 250,000 - 250,000
24 Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail
Capital Costs - - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - 382,500 382,500 765,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
26 METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttles
Capital Costs 240,000 240,000 250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 240,000 240,000 250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
30 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program
Capital Costs 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
31 Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improv.
Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
32 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements
Capital Costs 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Grants - - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
44 A ST NE Pedestrian Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 150,000 - - 150,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 150,000 - - 150,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
DI.K Page 262 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 10
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP:Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects (Continued)
45 Interurban Trailhead Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 210,000 - - 210,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - 210,000 - - 210,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
56 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements ($36K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 363,500 - - - - - 363,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)363,500 - - - - - 363,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Subtotal, Non-Motorized & Transit Projects:
Capital Costs 823,500 520,000 470,000 940,000 5,705,000 5,965,000 14,423,500
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 440,000 340,000 450,000 400,000 502,500 402,500 2,535,000
Grants 363,500 - - 360,000 4,932,500 5,382,500 11,038,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Other (Other Agencies)- - - - 250,000 - 250,000
Total Funding 823,500 520,000 470,000 940,000 5,705,000 5,965,000 14,423,500
DI.K Page 263 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 11
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects
13 Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project ($681K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000
27 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management Study
Capital Costs 8,840 - - - - - 8,840
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 8,840 - - - - - 8,840
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
29 So. 277th, Wetland Mitigation ($270K Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees
46 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study ($2,000 Expended Prior to 2013)
Capital Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
47 Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study
Capital Costs - - - 5,000 - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 5,000 - - 5,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
48 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study
Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
49 S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Study
Capital Costs - - 5,000 - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
54 Kersey Way Study
Capital Costs - - 200,000 - - - 200,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - 200,000 - - - 200,000
Subtotal, Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects:
Capital Costs 73,840 50,000 225,000 25,000 65,000 20,000 458,840
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 48,840 25,000 5,000 5,000 - - 83,840
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 220,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 375,000
Total Funding 73,840 50,000 225,000 25,000 65,000 20,000 458,840
DI.K Page 264 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 12
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
TIP#Roadway Preservation Projects
22 West Valley Highway System Improvements
Capital Costs 1,120,000 - - - - - 1,120,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Funds 560,000 - - - - - 560,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)560,000 - - - - - 560,000
Utility tax - - - - - - -
28 Annual Bridge Preservation Project
Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
35 Annual Arterial Street Preservation
Capital Costs 1,300,000 1,800,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 8,300,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Funds - 500,000 - - - - 500,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Utility Tax 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000
36 Annual Arterial Crackseal Program
Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Funds - - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Utility Tax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
37 Local Street Preservation Program SOS
Capital Costs 3,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 13,000,000
Funding Sources:
Local St Preservation Funds 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Property Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Totals
Subtotal, Preservation Projects:
Capital Costs 5,670,000 4,050,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 23,920,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Arterial Preservation Funds 560,000 500,000 - - - - 1,060,000
Grants (Fed, State, Local)560,000 - - - - - 560,000
Utility Tax 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 9,000,000
Local St Preservation Funds 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000
Property Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Total Funding 5,670,000 4,050,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 23,920,000
DI.K Page 265 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 13
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary
FUNDING SOURCES:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 895,340 525,000 825,100 1,205,000 1,792,500 1,052,500 6,295,440
Traffic Impact Fees 201,900 316,500 1,834,700 1,663,100 1,343,200 784,800 6,144,200
Traffic Mitigation Fees 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
Local Street Fund 103 3,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 13,000,000
Arterial Street Fund 105 2,060,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 10,060,000
Grants 8,688,573 3,051,108 8,471,700 8,392,500 20,798,200 9,882,500 59,284,581
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
REET2 250,000 175,000 175,000 725,000 725,000 625,000 2,675,000
Other (Agencies)1,249,400 - - - 250,000 - 1,499,400
Other (Development)- 1,300,000 1,850,000 2,500,000 - 6,885,000 12,535,000
Other (Muckleshoot)466,389 - - - - - 466,389
Other (Redflex)10,000 - - - - - 10,000
PWTF 1,800,115 - - - - - 1,800,115
Total Funding 18,791,717 9,547,608 16,676,500 18,165,600 28,428,900 22,909,800 114,520,125
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Unrestricted Street Revenue
Beginning Fund Balance 1,002,000 451,000 521,000 266,000 (693,000) (1,794,500)
Annual Revenue 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000
Project Expenses 895,340 525,000 825,100 1,205,000 1,792,500 1,052,500
End of Year Fund Balance 641,660 461,000 230,900 (404,000) (1,950,500) (2,312,000)
Traffic Impact Fees
Beginning Fund Balance 1,311,600 1,909,700 2,393,200 1,358,500 495,400 (47,800)
Annual Revenue 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000
Project Expenses 201,900 316,500 1,834,700 1,663,100 1,343,200 784,800
End of Year Fund Balance 1,909,700 2,393,200 1,358,500 495,400 (47,800) (32,600)
Traffic Mitigation Fees
Beginning Fund Balance 427,330 277,330 277,330 277,330 277,330 277,330
Annual Revenue - - - - - -
Project Expenses 150,000 - - - - -
End of Year Fund Balance 277,330 277,330 277,330 277,330 277,330 277,330
Local Street Fund 103
Beginning Fund Balance 1,118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970
Annual Revenue 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Project Expenses 3,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
End of Year Fund Balance 118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970 118,970
Arterial Street Fund 105
Beginning Fund Balance 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369
Annual Revenue 2,060,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Project Expenses 2,060,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
End of Year Fund Balance 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369 1,239,369
Grants
Secured Grants 7,321,243 153,000 - - - -
Unsecured Grants 1,367,330 2,898,108 8,471,700 8,392,500 20,798,200 9,882,500
DI.K Page 266 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 14
DI.K Page 267 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 15
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 1 (3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW) TIP # 1
Project No:c207a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Ingrid Gaub LOS Corridor ID# 18
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 258,962 18,504 - - 277,466 277,466
Grants (Fed,State,Local)4,680,402 1,900,338 - - 6,580,740 6,580,740
Traffic Impact Fees 187,309 737,751 25,000 25,000 950,060 1,600,060
Other Sources (Developer)*209,123 198,437 - - 407,560 407,560
5,335,796 2,855,030 25,000 25,000 8,215,826 8,865,826
200,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,667,209 - 10,000 10,000 1,677,209 1,817,209
Right of Way 1,072,268 - - - 1,072,268 1,072,268
Construction 2,596,319 2,855,030 15,000 15,000 5,466,349 5,976,349
5,335,796 2,855,030 25,000 25,000 8,215,826 8,865,826
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 200,000
Other Sources (Developer)*- - - - - -
350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 200,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 100,000 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 300,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 375,000 150,000
350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 200,000
Grants / Other Sources:Other Source is MultiCare Contribution
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Construct a multi-lane arterial from 3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor
development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor.
The project length is approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the northern property owner. If the
property develops, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251,000).
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,830.
Adopted Budget
Progress Summary:
Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final design and environmental permitting were completed in 2011. Construction was
completed in 2012 and required wetland monitoring will continue until 2023.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 268 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 16
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to Fir TIP # 2
Project No:cp1118
Project Type:Non-Motorized
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,624 54,876 43,500 - 100,000 100,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 135,500 705,330 - 840,830 840,830
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
1,624 190,376 748,830 - 940,830 940,830
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,624 180,376 50,000 - 232,000 232,000
Right of Way - 10,000 - - 10,000 10,000
Construction - - 698,830 - 698,830 698,830
1,624 190,376 748,830 - 940,830 940,830
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 43,500 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 705,330 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - - - 748,830 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 698,830 -
- - - - 748,830 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct pedestrian improvements along Auburn Way South between Dogwood St SE and Fir St SE that are consistent
with WSDOT's SR-164 Route Development Plan. This project includes sidewalk improvements, access management, a mid-block
pedestrian crossing, construction of a u-turn wedge at Fir St SE and street lighting.
Progress Summary:
Project design began in 2012 with construction expected to be completed in 2013. The City was awarded $100,000 in
federal funding and $740,830 in state funding in May 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 269 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 17
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way Corridor Imp. (4th St NE to 4th St SE) TIP # 3
Project No:c409a0
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2-3
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 78,251 - - - 78,251 788,251
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,108,700
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951
Capital Expenditures:
Design 78,251 - - - 78,251 696,951
Right of Way - - - - - 200,000
Construction - - - - - 3,000,000
78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 110,000 600,000 710,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 618,700 - 618,700 -
Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 -
Construction - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 -
- - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project is based on a pre-design study and is intended to improve pedestrian accessibility, appearance, and link the
downtown area along Auburn Way South between 4th St NE and 4th St SE. This project may include some pavement
repairs. However, an overlay was completed as part of the City's Arterial Pavement Preservation Program in 2007. Although
this was considered a temporary fix, the scope has been modified to account for the pavement work. The project length is
approximately a half mile.
Progress Summary:
The pavement portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial Pavement Preservation
Program.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 270 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 18
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: I Street NE Corridor (45th St. NE to S 277th St) TIP # 4
Project No:c415a0, cp1207
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD, Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 21
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 11,827 150,000 - - 161,827 161,827
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000
Other (*Port of Seattle)- - - - - -
11,827 150,000 - - 161,827 6,921,827
Capital Expenditures:
Design 11,827 25,000 - - 36,827 460,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,020,000
Construction - 125,000 - - 125,000 5,280,000
11,827 150,000 - - 161,827 6,921,827
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 11,827 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources (Development)- - - 5,760,000 5,760,000 -
Other (Port of Seattle)- - - - - -
- - - 6,760,000 6,771,827
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 460,000 471,827 -
Right of Way - - - 1,020,000 1,020,000 -
Construction - - - 5,280,000 5,280,000 -
- - - 6,760,000 6,771,827 -
Grants / Other Sources:
The final alignment of the I Street Corridor is being analyzed as part of the Northeast Auburn Special Area Plan
Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW and Construction will be developer funded. The cross section will likely
be a 5-lane arterial per the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Progress Summary:
This project is development driven. 2012 expenditures were for design and construction of culvert crossing.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Expenditures:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,200.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 271 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 19
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street Grade Separation (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5
Project No:c201a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 6
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 150,000 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)872,372 5,169,000 3,664,485 - 9,705,857 9,705,857
REET2 1,140,000 - - - 1,140,000 1,140,000
Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)3,128,260 1,228,300 - - 4,356,560 4,356,560
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)- - 15,000 105,000 15,000 3,040,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000 660,000
PWTFL - 1,008,084 1,800,115 - 2,808,199 2,808,199
Other Sources (Other Agencies)*235,079 1,753,351 1,249,400 - 3,237,830 3,237,830
6,035,711 9,308,735 6,729,000 105,000 22,073,446 22,058,446
Debt Service:
3,040,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 2,674,716 - - - 2,674,716 2,674,716
Right of Way 3,358,708 - - - 3,358,708 3,358,708
Construction 2,287 9,308,735 6,714,000 - 16,025,022 16,025,022
PWTFL Debt Service - - 15,000 105,000 15,000 3,040,000
6,035,711 9,308,735 6,729,000 105,000 22,073,446 22,058,446
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 3,664,485 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 540,000 2,500,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - 1,800,115 -
Other Sources (Other Agencies)*- - - - 1,249,400 -
105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 7,254,000 2,500,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 6,714,000 -
PWTFL Debt Service 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 540,000 2,500,000
105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 7,254,000 2,500,000
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $21,827.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M St SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks.
Progress Summary:
100% Design Drawings and right of way acquisition were completed in 2011. Construction started in early 2012 and is
schedule for completion in 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Grants / Other Sources: Other Agencies are King County Metro Sewer, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, and BNSF Railway
DI.K Page 272 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 20
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: South 277th (Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge) TIP # 6
Project No:c222a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 15
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,085 102,700 156,600 - 278,385 278,385
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 867,700 153,000 867,700 4,900,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 290,700
Other (Development Funds)*- - - 1,300,000 - 2,300,000
Other - - - - - -
19,085 102,700 1,024,300 1,453,000 1,146,085 7,769,085
Capital Expenditures:
Design 19,085 102,700 1,007,000 153,000 1,128,785 1,281,785
Right of Way - - 17,300 1,300,000 17,300 1,317,300
Construction - - - - - 5,170,000
19,085 102,700 1,024,300 1,453,000 1,146,085 7,769,085
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 156,600 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)3,879,300 - - - 4,900,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 290,700 - - - 290,700 -
Other (Development Funds)*1,000,000 - - - 2,300,000 -
Other - - - - - -
5,170,000 - - - 7,647,300 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 1,160,000 -
Right of Way - - - - 1,317,300 -
Construction 5,170,000 - - - 5,170,000 -
5,170,000 - - - 7,647,300 -
Grants / Other Sources:
This project includes preliminary engineering, design, right of way acquisition and construction of major widening on S. 277th
Street, including the addition of three lanes, one westbound and two eastbound, a Class 1 trail, and storm improvements.
The project length is nine-tenths of a mile.
Progress Summary:
Staff is cooridnating with the City of Kent and King County to complete annexation of roadway into City of Auburn jurisdiction.
Robertson Properties Group is participating in this project and is dedicating all necessary roadway frontage to the City.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Expenditures:
The annual maintenance costs for this project is estimated to be $27,250.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 273 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 21
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP # 7
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 12
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 575,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,800,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 3,375,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 375,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 3,000,000
- - - - - 3,375,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 75,000 500,000 - 575,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 300,000 2,500,000 - 2,800,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 375,000 3,000,000 - 3,375,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 375,000 - - 375,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 -
- 375,000 3,000,000 - 3,375,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
This project was originally scoped to include pavement preservation. The pavement preservation component could still be
combined with this project, but is also eligible for the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. This project should look to
improve the railroad crossing grades as well as the vertical sight distance to the interurban trail to the west of the tracks. The
cost estimate listed below is planning level cost.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 274 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 22
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW) TIP # 8
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 18
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Developer)*150,000 - - - 150,000 150,000
150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 400,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction 150,000 - - - 150,000 2,650,000
150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 150,000 - - - 150,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Developer)*- - - - - -
150,000 - 3,000,000 - 3,150,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 150,000 - 250,000 - 400,000 -
Right of Way - - 250,000 - 250,000 -
Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 -
150,000 - 3,000,000 - 3,150,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Construct a multi-lane arterial from W Main to 3rd St NW. This project will connect A St NW, Phase 1 to the Sound Transit
Station and the Central Business District. This project may end up being funded all or in part by developers. The project
length is one fifth of a mile.
Progress Summary:
The parking garage constructed by the Auburn Regional Medical Center completed a portion of this project in 2009.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 275 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 23
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: D Street NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW) TIP # 9
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 20
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 5,250,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 1,050,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 6,300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 1,050,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000
Construction - - - - - 3,500,000
- - - - - 6,300,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 250,000 250,000 5,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 50,000 1,000,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 300,000 300,000 750,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000
Construction - - - - - 3,500,000
- - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $11,450.
Adopted Budget
Construct a four-lane arterial per the city Comprehensive Plan. It will improve north/south mobility. This project is tied to
potential future development and will complete a major north/south arterial corridor from Ellingson Road SW (41st Street SE)
to S. 277th St. The D St NW project length is approximately 0.42 miles.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 276 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 24
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: F Street SE (4th St SE to Auburn Way S) TIP # 10
Project No:cp0911
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,200,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 7,620 - - - - 307,620
Other - - - - - -
7,620 - - - - 2,507,620
Capital Expenditures:
Design 7,620 - - - 7,620 257,620
Right of Way - - - - - 75,000
Construction - - - - - 2,175,000
7,620 - - - 7,620 2,507,620
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000 -
Other - - - - - -
250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 250,000 - - 250,000 -
Right of Way - 75,000 - - 75,000 -
Construction - 2,175,000 - - 2,175,000 -
250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
The F St SE project includes pavement reconstruction, installation of curbs, gutters, an 8-foot wide sidewalk on both sides,
parking on one side, and a center turn-lane, as well as crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge. This
project improves mobility and safety along the corridor. The project length is approximately 0.3 miles.
Progress Summary:
Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Final design and construction are planned to be completed
following construction of the M Street grade separation project.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $4,100.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 277 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 25
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP # 11
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,225,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 - 250,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 - 1,475,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 50,000 - 125,000
Right of Way - - - - - 200,000
Construction - - - - - 1,150,000
- - - 50,000 - 1,475,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000 -
Other - - - - - -
275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 75,000 - - - 125,000 -
Right of Way 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Construction - 1,150,000 - 1,150,000 -
275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,500.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct a complete 4 lane street section on M St NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design will be done in 2014 to refine project scope, alignment, and cost.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 278 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 26
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard TIP # 12
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - 32,125,000
- - - - - 32,125,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 3,625,000
Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000
Construction - - - - - 24,500,000
- - - - - 32,125,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Developer)- - - 1,125,000 1,125,000 31,000,000
- - - 1,125,000 1,125,000 31,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 1,125,000 1,125,000 2,500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000
Construction - - - - - 24,500,000
- - - 1,125,000 1,125,000 31,000,000
Grants / Other Sources:
This project consists of a grade-separated crossing of the BNSF Railyard, either from SR-18 to 6th Street SE or from 15th
Street SW to A Street SE. The first alternative would entail realigning the SR-18 eastbound ramp, grade separating the main
north/south line and the Stampede Pass line, and connecting to 6th Street SE. The second alternative would provide a new
corridor from 15th Street SW to A Street SE in the vicinity of 12th Street SE and 17th Street SE, either via an overpass or
underpass of the BNSF Railyard. This project improves traffic flow significantly due to the potential development of the
BNSF yard as an intermodal freight facility.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 279 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 27
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 8th Street NE Widening (Pike St to R St NE)TIP # 15
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,160,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 290,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 1,450,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction - - - - - 1,000,000
- - - - - 1,450,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 -
Other - - - - - -
450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 -
450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Add eastbound lane to Southside of 8th St NE. Currently the lane exists from M St NE and drops as a right turn only lane at
the intersection of 8th St NE and Pike St. This would extend the lane to R St NE where it would then be a right turn only lane
onto R St NE southbound. This is a planning level cost estimate.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 280 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 28
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to I Street NE TIP # 16
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 29
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - -
Other (Development)*- - - - - 3,350,000
- - - - - 3,350,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 250,000
Right of Way - - - - - 600,000
Construction - - - - - 2,500,000
- - - - - 3,350,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - -
Other (Development)*850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000 -
850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Right of Way 600,000 - - - 600,000 -
Construction - 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 -
850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $27,050.
Adopted Budget
Construct east/west corridor from Auburn Way North to I Street NE. The existing 49th Street NE extends westerly to B Street
NE. This project also includes a traffic signal at the intersection of Auburn Way North and 49th Street NE. This roadway was
evaluated and recommended in the NE Special Planning Area. It is anticipated that this will be constructed by future
development. It is approximately 3/4 of a mile in length.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 281 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 29
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3 TIP # 39
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 735,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 115,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 850,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 100,000
Right of Way - - - - - 50,000
Construction - - - - - 700,000
- - - - - 850,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 85,000 650,000 - 735,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - 15,000 100,000 - 115,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- 100,000 750,000 - 850,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 -
Right of Way - - 50,000 - 50,000 -
Construction - - 700,000 - 700,000 -
- 100,000 750,000 - 850,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 320th St
and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include constructing bike lanes, sidewalks, dual southbound left turn lanes into GRCC, and ITS. A
portion of this project is the main entrance to Green River Community College and will require additional on-site improvements by
GRCC.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 282 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 30
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1 TIP # 40
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 125,000 - 1,690,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 25,000 50,000 260,000
Other - - - - - -
- - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction - - - - - 1,500,000
- - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 185,000 - - - 260,000 -
Other - - - - - -
1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Construction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 -
1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of a 4-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th St.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is planned for 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 283 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 31
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 TIP # 41
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19, 23
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,015,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 - 235,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 - 1,250,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 50,000 - 150,000
Right of Way - - - - - 100,000
Construction - - - - - 1,000,000
- - - 50,000 - 1,250,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)150,000 865,000 - - 1,015,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 135,000 - - 235,000 -
Other - - - - - -
200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,250,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 100,000 - - - 150,000 -
Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 -
Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 -
200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,250,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 312th St
and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include adding bike lanes, dual westbound left turn lanes, dual southbound thru lanes, northbound
right turn pocket, ITS and pedestrian safety improvements.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is scheduled for 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 284 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 32
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements TIP # 42
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 549,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 140,500
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 690,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 110,000
Right of Way - - - - - 60,000
Construction - - - - - 520,000
- - - - - 690,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 47,500 502,000 - 549,500 -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 12,500 78,000 - 140,500 -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
50,000 60,000 580,000 - 690,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 50,000 60,000 - - 110,000 -
Right of Way - - 60,000 - 60,000 -
Construction - - 520,000 - 520,000 -
50,000 60,000 580,000 - 690,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of a 3 lane roadway with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
SE 320th St between 124th Ave SE and the western entrance to GRCC.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 285 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 33
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety Improvements TIP # 43
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 250,000 2,083,108 250,000 2,333,108
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 250,000 2,083,108 250,000 2,333,108
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 250,000 62,210 250,000 312,210
Right of Way - - - 69,585 - 69,585
Construction - - - 1,951,313 - 1,951,313
- - 250,000 2,083,108 250,000 2,333,108
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 2,333,108 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 2,333,108 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 312,210 -
Right of Way - - - - 69,585 -
Construction - - - - 1,951,313 -
- - - - 2,333,108 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will improve access management, provide u-turns, upgrade transit stops and street lighting, widen to accomodate turn lanes
and pedestrians and bicycles, upgrade pavement markings, install pedestrian signals and audible pedestrian push buttons, and upgrade
traffic signals to change the phasing and to improve the visibility of the signal heads.
Progress Summary:
Grant funding was awarded in 2012 and does not require a local match.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 286 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 34
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South Corridor Imp., Fir ST SE to Hemlock ST SE TIP # 58
Project No:cp1119
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 849 - - - 849 849
Grants (State)842 560,000 1,865,558 - 2,426,400 2,426,400
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources(Muckleshoot)211 140,000 466,389 - 606,600 606,600
1,902 700,000 2,331,947 3,033,849 3,033,849
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,902 475,000 - - 476,902 476,902
Right of Way - 225,000 - - 225,000 225,000
Construction - - 2,331,947 - 2,331,947 2,331,947
1,902 700,000 2,331,947 - 3,033,849 3,033,849
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - - 1,865,558 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources(Muckleshoot)- - - - 466,389 -
- - - - 2,331,947 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 2,331,947 -
- - - - 2,331,947 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $9,300.
Adopted Budget
This project will widen Auburn Way South between Fir St SE and Hemlock St SE to five lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks, illumination
and storm improvements. A new traffic signal will also be constructed at Hemlock Street SE and connect to Auburn's Intelligent
Transportation System.
Progress Summary:
Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) awarded grant in the amount of $2,426,400 on November 19,
2010 to the City of Auburn.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 287 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 35
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)TIP # 60
Project No:xxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 500,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 4,675,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 1,500,000
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 6,675,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 650,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,275,000
Construction - - - - - 4,750,000
- - - - - 6,675,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 250,000 250,000 - 500,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 650,000 - - 650,000 -
Right of Way - 1,275,000 - - 1,275,000 -
Construction - - 4,750,000 - 4,750,000 -
- 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Construct a multi-lane arterial from 8TH Street SE to AWS. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 288 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 36
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street SE)TIP # 62
Project No:xxx
Project Type:Miscellaneous
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 400,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - 1,100,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 4,750,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,450,000
Construction - - - - - 2,800,000
- - - - - 4,750,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 1,200,000 2,050,000 - 3,250,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - 550,000 550,000 - 1,100,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 500,000 - - - -
Right of Way - 1,450,000 - - - -
Construction - - 2,800,000 - - -
- 1,950,000 2,800,000 - - -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
The purpose of this project is to revitalize and beautify Auburn Way South from the SR 18 interchange to the intersection of M Street SE.
Proposed improvements include: enhancement of crosswalks and pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sidewalks; curb and gutter;
pedestrian ramps; new landscaped medians; street trees; new lighting; pedestrian benches; trash receptacles; recycling containers and
other appropriate amenities.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 289 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 37
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Harvey Road & 8th Street NE Intersection Improvements TIP # 17
Project No:cp0611
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:None LOS Corridor ID# 5,19
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)174,800 87,300 86,900 86,500 349,000 1,603,100
Traffic Impact Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500 204,500
PWTF 1,527,300 - - - 1,527,300 1,527,300
1,906,600 87,300 86,900 86,500 2,080,800 1,731,800
Debt Service:
1,603,100
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Long Term Debt - PWTF - 87,300 86,900 86,500 174,200 1,428,300
- 87,300 86,900 86,500 174,200 -
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000 826,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
PWTF - - - - - -
86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000 826,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Long Term Debt - PWTF 86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000 826,000
86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 515,000 826,000
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Budget Amendments
Add one eastbound through/right turn lane on 8th St NE approaching Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traffic
channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane will improve traffic delays and vehicle queuing at the
intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all directions. This project will reconstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a
segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles in length with four travel lanes. The reconstruction will fix the existing poor
pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the sidewalk network.
Progress Summary:
Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for PWTFL debt payments.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
DI.K Page 290 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 38
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 8th Street NE and SE 104th St Intersection Improvements TIP # 18
Project No:CP1104
Project Type:Intersection Improvement, Capacity
Project Manager:Robert Lee LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 8,600 - 148,400 - 157,000 157,000
Grants (Federal)- 100,000 - - 100,000 100,000
REET2 - - 75,000 - 75,000 75,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)- 40,000 10,000 - 50,000 50,000
8,600 140,000 233,400 - 382,000 382,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 7,122 110,000 - - 117,122 117,122
Right of Way 1,478 30,000 - - 31,478 31,478
Construction - - 233,400 - 233,400 233,400
8,600 140,000 233,400 - 382,000 382,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 148,400 -
Grants (Federal)- - - - - -
REET2 - - - - 75,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)- - - - 10,000 -
- - - - 233,400 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 233,400 -
- - - - 233,400 -
Grants / Other Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $6,600.
Adopted Budget
This project includes the design, right of way acquisistion and construction of intersection improvements that will either
consist of either a traffic signal with easbound u-turn capacity or a roundabout design.
Progress Summary:
The design began in 2011 with construction scheduled for 2012.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 291 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 39
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improvements TIP # 19
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 - 175,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 425,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 - 600,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 50,000 - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - 100,000
Construction - - - - - 450,000
- - - 50,000 - 600,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 125,000 - - 175,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 425,000 - - 425,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 550,000 - - 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - 100,000 - - 100,000 -
Construction - 450,000 - - 450,000 -
- 550,000 - - 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funds are unsecure.
This project will construct a new complete traffic signal with controller cabinet and battery backup along with necessary
intersection improvements.
Progress Summary:
Design will be completed in 2014. Construction is planned for 2015.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 292 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 40
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Imp.TIP # 20
Project No:cp1024
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 3,4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,830 80,170 - - 100,000 100,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 450,000 - 450,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - 150,000 - 150,000 150,000
Other - - - - - -
19,830 80,170 150,000 450,000 250,000 700,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 19,830 80,170 50,000 - 130,170 150,000
Right of Way - - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000
Construction - - - 450,000 - 450,000
19,830 80,170 150,000 450,000 250,000 700,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 450,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - 150,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - - - - 100,000 -
Construction - - - - 450,000 -
- - - - 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This Project is the first phase of improvements for this intersection. Scope includes construction of a new westbound to
northbound right turn pocket, improved turning radius at corner, realignment of westbound 17th St SE's approach to Auburn
Way South, lighting improvements, related traffic signal modifications and right of way acquisition.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design was completed in 2012. Final design and right of way acquisition are planned for 2013 and construction is
planned for 2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 293 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 41
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: C Street NW and West Main Street TIP # 21
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 11
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 20,000 - 20,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 80,000 - 880,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 200,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 100,000 - 1,100,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 100,000 - 100,000
Right of Way - - - - - 400,000
Construction - - - - - 600,000
- - - 100,000 - 1,100,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 20,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)800,000 - - - 880,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Other - - - - - -
1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 100,000 -
Right of Way 400,000 - - - 400,000 -
Construction 600,000 - - - 600,000 -
1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Reconstruct intersection at C St NW and W Main St. Project would include a new traffic signal and modifications to the
turning radii at each corner to help facilitate vehicular movements. The new traffic signal would allow for protected left turn
phasing for northbound and southbound left turn movements. This would also provide additional safety related to the railroad
pre-emption.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 294 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 42
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Traffic Signal Improvements TIP #34
Project No:various
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Scott Nutter
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 525,000 1,225,000
Other - - - - - -
- 175,000 175,000 175,000 525,000 1,225,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 25,000 25,000 25,000 - 175,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 150,000 150,000 150,000 300,000 1,050,000
- 175,000 175,000 175,000 300,000 1,225,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Other - - - - - -
175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 -
175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project includes procuring and installing traffic signal equipment upgrades for existing signals as well as safety/capacity
improvements for existing and/or new signals. The City uses accident and traffic count data to identify intersections in need of
improvements.
Progress Summary:
Project continues to complete various intersection improvements.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
DI.K Page 295 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 43
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements TIP # 38
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Intersection Safety (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 250,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,750,000
REET - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 3,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 500,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 2,500,000
- - - - - 3,000,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 200,000 300,000 - 500,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 1,000,000 1,500,000 - 2,500,000 -
- 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of four quadrant gates at the W Main St, 3rd St NW, and 37th
St NW BNSF Railroad crossings as well as active grade crossing lights and gates at the private spur crossings on C St SW and A St
NW.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 296 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 44
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP # 50
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (ITS)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 60,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 380,000
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 440,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 40,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 400,000
- - - - - 440,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000 -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 20,000 - 20,000 - 40,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 200,000 - 200,000 - 400,000 -
220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design and construction of Dynamic Message signs at various locations throughout the city. Dynamic message
signs are an important tool in ITS for informing roadway users. Priority locations for sign installations are based on the Comprehensive
Transportation Plans ITS map and include Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Rd.
Progress Summary:
The first phase of this project is scheduled to begin in 2014 or sooner if grant funding becomes available.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 297 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 45
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: East Valley Highway ITS Expansion TIP # 51
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 692,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 108,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 800,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 85,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 715,000
- - - - - 800,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)692,000 - - - 692,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 108,000 - - - 108,000 -
Other - - - - - -
800,000 - - - 800,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 85,000 - - - 85,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 715,000 - - - 715,000 -
800,000 - - - 800,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of ITS facilities from 41st St SE to Lake Tapps Parkway.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 298 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 46
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Ave NE & 3rd St NE Pedestrian & Access Improvements TIP # 59
Project No:cp1023
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Robert Lee LOS Corridor ID# 2
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 8,538 - 3,000 40,000 11,538 191,638
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 12,000 160,000 12,000 732,400
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
8,538 - 15,000 200,000 23,538 924,038
Capital Expenditures:
Design 8,538 - 15,000 200,000 23,538 223,538
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 700,500
8,538 - 15,000 200,000 23,538 924,038
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 140,100 - - - 183,100 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)560,400 - - - 732,400 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
700,500 - - - 915,500 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 215,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 700,500 - - - 700,500 -
700,500 - - - 915,500 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Adopted Budget
This project will improve access, safety and operations for pedestrian, bicyclists and motorized vehicles at the intersections of 3rd St NE
& Auburn Ave, 4th St NE and Auburn Ave, and 4th St NE & Auburn Way North. Improvements include a new traffic signal and
geometric improvements at 3rd Street NE to add a missing pedestrian crossing and add northbound left turn movement; removing all
ADA obstructions from the pedestrian path within the project limits, restricting uncontrolled accesses near the intersection, and modifying
the traffic signal at Auburn Way North and 4th St NE to eliminate the east/west split phase operation.
Progress Summary:
Survey and predesign were started in 2010-2011. Design will be completed in 2013 and construction is scheduled for 2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Total Expenditures:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 299 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 47
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 29th Street SE & R Street SE TIP # 63
Project No:cpXXX
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID#4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - - - 850,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 500,000
REET - - - - - 450,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 1,800,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - 450,000
Construction - - - - 1,000,000
- - - - - 1,800,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - 850,000 850,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 500,000 500,000 -
REET - - - 450,000 450,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 350,000 350,000 -
Right of Way - - - 450,000 450,000 -
Construction - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 -
- - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at 29th
Street SE and R Street SE. This project will include creating eastbound/westbound dual left turn lanes, auxiliary signal heads and
pedestrian safety enhancements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 300 of 335
Intersection, Traffic Signal, & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 48
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Traffic Signals Safety Improvements TIP # 67
Project No:cpxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 2,500 5,000 - 7,500 7,500
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 400,000 - 400,000 400,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 2,500 405,000 - 407,500 407,500
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 2,500 80,000 - 82,500 82,500
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 325,000 - 325,000 325,000
- 2,500 405,000 - 407,500 407,500
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 400,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 405,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 80,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 325,000 -
- - - - 405,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
This project will improve traffic signal phasing and timing, improve visibility of traffic signal heads, and install countdown pedestrian
signal displays and ADA pedestrian pushbuttons.
Progress Summary:
Grant funding was awarded June 2012 with no local match requirement. Project will be designed and constructed in 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.
DI.K Page 301 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 49
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass TIP # 23
Project No:c229a0
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 53,900 - - - 53,900 53,900
Grants (Fed,State,Local)170,400 - - - 170,400 9,720,400
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees -
Other - - - - - 250,000
224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300
Capital Expenditures:
Design 224,300 - - - 224,300 974,300
Right of Way - - - - - 50,000
Construction - - - - - 9,000,000
224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 4,550,000 5,000,000 9,550,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Other Agencies)*- - 250,000 - 250,000 -
- - 4,800,000 5,000,000 9,800,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 750,000 - 750,000 -
Right of Way - - 50,000 - 50,000 -
Construction - - 4,000,000 5,000,000 9,000,000 -
- - 4,800,000 5,000,000 9,800,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $240.
Adopted Budget
Project to construct an undercrossing of the BNSF Railroad in conjunction with a pedestrian bridge to allow a safe, direct,
attractive non-motorized access between neighborhoods in the City of Pacific and schools in the City of Auburn.
Progress Summary:
The design is on hold. Funding source is most likely a federal earmark. Currently this project is on hold pending some
discussions with BNSF RR. They are in the process of planning for a third rail which would significantly impact the design.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 302 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 50
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail TIP # 24
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 135,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 765,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - - - - 900,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 850,000
- - - - - 900,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 382,500 382,500 765,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 425,000 425,000 850,000 -
- 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,680.
Adopted Budget
This project will use existing right-of-way to repair the damaged roadbed to a usable multi-use trail on Academy Dr from the
Green River Rd to Auburn Way S.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 303 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 51
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttles TIP # 26
Project No:NA
Project Type:Other
Project Manager:Pablo Para
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 220,000 240,000 240,000 460,000 1,720,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Other (TBD)- - - - - -
- 220,000 240,000 240,000 460,000 1,720,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Operating Costs - 220,000 240,000 240,000 460,000 1,720,000
- 220,000 240,000 240,000 460,000 1,720,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Other (TBD)- - - - - -
250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Operating Costs 250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000 -
250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 1,500,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Operation costs associated with two new Metro routes: a Commuter Shuttle from the Lakeland Hills neighborhood to Auburn Station and
a Community Shuttle linking residential neighborhoods with commercial and service centers.
Progress Summary:
Lakeland Hill Service began in 2009. The community shuttle will begin service in 2010. Funding assistance will be requested
through the Transit Now Partnership Program.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 304 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 52
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program TIP # 30
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Bi-Annual)
Project Manager:Pablo Para
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 100,000 100,000 300,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 90,000 - 90,000 270,000
- - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,000 - 10,000 - 30,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 90,000 - 90,000 - 270,000 -
100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This is a bi-annual level of effort project used to fund small pedestrian safety studies and improvement projects. This project
provides for pedestrian safety studies and improvements at various locations citywide. Projects are prioritized annually
based on safety issues and pedestrian demands.
Progress Summary:
Project for 2011 was preliminary design of 8th St NE and SE 104th St intersection improvements. 2012 project is access
improvements at Auburn Ave and 3rd St NE.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 305 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 53
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements TIP # 31
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Safety)
Project Manager:Various
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000
- - 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 -
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
This is an annual level of effort project focused on funding bicycle and safety improvements on classified roadways. Projects
are prioritized annually based upon field studies. Project was previously called "Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure
Improvements.
Progress Summary:
Projects for 2011 included preliminary design of intersection improvements at 8th st NE and SE 104th St and pedestrian trail
improvements at 37th St SE. 2012 Project has yet to be indentified.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 306 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 54
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Citywide Sidewalk Improvements TIP #32
Project No:Various
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - 235,000 20,000 180,000 435,000 835,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 235,000 20,000 180,000 435,000 835,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 20,000 20,000 - 40,000 80,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 215,000 - 180,000 395,000 755,000
- 235,000 20,000 180,000 255,000 835,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 20,000 20,000 - 60,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 180,000 - 180,000 540,000 -
20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Project will fund sidewalk improvements to a variety of locations throughout the city. A sidewalk inventory was completed in
2004. Annual projects are selected based upon criteria such as: gap closure, safe walking routes to schools, completion of
downtown pedestrian corridor or "linkage", connectivity to transit services, ADA requirements, and "Save our Streets" (SOS)
project locations.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 307 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 55
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements TIP # 44
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Sidewalk Improvements (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 150,000
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 150,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 15,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 135,000
- - - - - 150,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 15,000 - - 15,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 135,000 - - 135,000 -
- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funds are unsecure.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500.
Adopted Budget
This project completes a pedestrian connection between Downtown Auburn and the 8th St NE business district. This project will improve
a pedestrian crossing at 3rd St NE, and construct sidewalks/access ramps along the A St NE corridor.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 308 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 56
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Interurban Trailhead Improvements TIP # 45
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 210,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 210,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 20,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 190,000
- - - - - 210,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 20,000 - - 20,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 190,000 - - 190,000 -
- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funds are unsecure.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding for enhancements to existing trailheads and construction of new trailheads. Improvements include bike
racks, kiosks, parking and access.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 309 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 57
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements TIP # 56
Project No:cp1120
Project Type:Non-Motorized
Project Manager:Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 777 - - - 777 777
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 35,000 363,500 - 398,500 398,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
777 35,000 363,500 - 399,277 399,277
Capital Expenditures:
Design 777 35,000 15,000 - 50,777 50,777
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 348,500 - 348,500 348,500
777 35,000 363,500 - 399,277 399,277
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 363,500 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 363,500 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 15,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 348,500 -
- - - - 363,500 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct pedestrian improvements along the south side of SE 312th St east of the intersection with 124th Ave SE,
intersection improvements at 116th Ave SE & SE 304th St, paint bike lanes on 116th Ave SE between SE 312th St and SE 304th St and
improve curb ramps adjacent to Rainier Middle School.
Progress Summary:
The City was awarded $398,500 in federal funding in May 2011, which consists of $75,700 for School District
education/encouragement, $1,800 for Police Dept. enforcement and $321,000 for engineering, right of way, and construction.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 310 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 58
DI.K Page 311 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 59
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project TIP #13
Project No:cp0767
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Jeff Dixon/Leah Dunsdon
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
General Fund - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 470,380 34,620 25,000 25,000 530,000 700,000
REET 2 176,150 - - - 176,150 176,150
646,530 34,620 25,000 25,000 706,150 145,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - 84,620
Construction - 34,620 25,000 25,000 59,620 -
- 34,620 25,000 25,000 59,620 145,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
General Fund - - - - - -
Grants - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000 20,000
REET 2 - - - - - -
20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000 20,000
Capital Expenditures:-
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000 20,000
20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 175,000 20,000
Grants / Other Sources:
It is anticipated that annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting on the performance of the wetland mitigation project will be required
for a period of 10 years, in conformance with permit requirements. After the successful conclusion of this 10-year monitoring period,
which is anticipated to be in December 2019, ongoing operation expenses should be minimal.
Adopted Budget
The project consists of the design, construction, maintenance and monitoring of approximately 2.2-acres of wetland creation
and approximately 0.4-acres of wetland enhancement within the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sewer Utility in
order to compensate for approximately 1.6-acre wetland loss on the Mohawk Plastics property (Parcel # 1321049056). The
project was approved under an existing agreement approved by Resolution No. 4196, June 2007.
Progress Summary:
The City received the DOE WQ Certification, WDFW HPA, and on May 7, 2009, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 404
wetland permit (NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid specifications and construction plans were prepared and construction
began in October 2009. Construction was completed in January 2010 and the project is currently within the 10-year
monitoring period, which involves annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 312 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 60
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management Study TIP # 27
Project No:cp1110
Project Type:Safety (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID# 10,33
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,160 - 8,840 - 10,000 10,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
1,160 - 8,840 - 10,000 10,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,160 - 8,840 - 10,000 10,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
1,160 - 8,840 - 10,000 10,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 8,840 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 8,840 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 8,840 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 8,840 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This study will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Study the area from 37th St SE to the White River on A St SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study
should review the safety and access needs of the traveling public and the adjacent properties.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design will be done to refine project scope, alignment, and cost.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 313 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 61
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: South 277th - Wetland Mitigation TIP # 29
Project No:c410a0
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 212,267 57,050 25,000 25,000 294,317 319,317
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
212,267 57,050 25,000 25,000 294,317 319,317
Capital Expenditures:
Design 81,903 18,000 10,000 10,000 109,903 119,903
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 130,364 39,050 15,000 15,000 184,414 199,414
212,267 57,050 25,000 25,000 294,317 319,317
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 50,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 50,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 20,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 30,000 -
- - - - 50,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Wetland mitigation for the 277th St Grade Separation project.
Progress Summary:
This is a 10-year obligation, which began in 2004.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
DI.K Page 314 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 62
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study TIP # 46
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Intersection Safety)
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# 24
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 5,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund a pre-design study to determine the right of way, environmental and construction requirements for intersection
safety improvements. This safety project scope will include sight distance improvements, constructing turn lanes, channelization,
environmental mitigation, signage and clear zone improvements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 315 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 63
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study TIP # 47
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on
Operating Budget:This project will have no
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
Adopted Budget - - - -
Budget Amendments - - - -
Adjusted Budget - - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Total Expenditures:- - - - - 5,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 5,000 - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
Total Funding Sources:- 5,000 - - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 5,000 - - 5,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Total Expenditures:- 5,000 - - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
This project will fund a study to determine the feasibility, scope and cost of low impact roadway, bicycle and pedestrian improvements in
the Environmental Park area. Included in this study scope is a connection between Clay St NW and Western St NW.
DI.K Page 316 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 64
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study TIP # 48
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Bike Lanes, Sidewalks and Transit Improvement Study (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 10,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 10,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 10,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 10,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding to complete a study of the 2nd St SE & F St SE corridor between Les Gove Park and Downtown Auburn.
Improvements may include pavement reconstruction, sidewalks, access ramps, signal modifications and route signing.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 317 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 65
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: S 316th Street Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Study TIP # 49
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 2 Bike Lanes / Sidewalks (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 37
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - - 5,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,000 - - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
5,000 - - - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 5,000 - - - 5,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
5,000 - - - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding for completing a study to add bicycle and pedestrian facilities on S 316th St from east of Evergreen
Heights Elementary to 51st Ave S.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 318 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 66
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Kersey Way Study TIP # 54
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - 200,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 200,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - - 200,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
- - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Other (Developer)*- - - - -
200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
None
Adopted Budget
This project will study improvements to the Kersey Way SE corridor from the White River Bridge to the southern city limits. The
study will develop the scope and costs for horizontal/vertical geometric roadway improvements, roadside hazard mitigation, street
lighting and non-motorized trail construction. The project length is approximately two miles.
Progress Summary:
Design will begin in 2015 after major transportation comprehensive plan update has been completed.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 319 of 335
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Preservation Projects
67
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: West Valley Highway System Preservation (15th NW to 37th NW)
Project No:cpxxxx TIP #22
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Artertial Preservation Fund - - 560,000 - 560,000 560,000
Grant Funding(Federal, State, Local)- - 560,000 - 560,000 560,000
Utility Tax - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
- - 1,120,000 - 1,120,000 1,120,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 134,000 - 134,000 134,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 986,000 - 986,000 986,000
- - 1,120,000 - 1,120,000 1,120,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Artertial Preservation Fund - - - - 560,000 -
Grant Funding(Federal, State, Local)- - - - 560,000 -
Utility Tax - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
- - - - 1,120,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 134,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 986,000 -
- - - - 1,120,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Adopted Budget
Description: The West Valley Highway System Preservation project will overlay the failing portions of the street pavement
between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW. This entails the installation of a leveling course, providing a 2”-3” thick asphalt
concrete overlay, and includes minor surface utility adjustments.
Progress Summary:
FHWA STP Grant funding was secured in 2012.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Total Expenditures:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
DI.K Page 320 of 335
Roadway Preservation Projects 68
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Annual Bridge Preservation Project TIP # 28
Project No:Various
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Pablo Para
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 350,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 350,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 35,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 45,000 45,000 45,000 90,000 315,000
- 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 350,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 270,000 -
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This is an annual level of effort project used to fund bridge improvements as identified by the city's annual bridge inspection program.
Progress Summary:
Program completed load rating calculations for nine bridges in 2011. 2012 project completed miscellaneous bridge repairs.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
DI.K Page 321 of 335
Roadway Preservation Projects 69
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Arterial Street Preservation Program
Project No:cpxxxx TIP #35
Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Artertial Preservation Fund - 185,000 - 500,000 185,000 685,000
Property Tax - - - - - -
Utility Tax - 1,366,500 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,500 9,166,500
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
- 1,551,500 1,300,000 1,800,000 2,851,500 9,851,500
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 50,000 40,000 50,000 90,000 300,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 1,501,500 1,260,000 1,750,000 2,761,500 9,551,500
- 1,551,500 1,300,000 1,800,000 2,851,500 9,851,500
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Artertial Preservation Fund - - - - 500,000 -
Property Tax - - - - - -
Utility Tax 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 8,300,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 250,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 1,260,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 8,050,000 -
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 8,300,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Adopted Budget
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully complete annual patching and overlay projects citywide.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified streets citywide. These
projects may include overlays, rebuilds, spot repairs, or a combination of these. This program is funded through a 1% utility
tax that was adopted by Council in 2008.
None
DI.K Page 322 of 335
Roadway Preservation Projects 70
ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Arterial Crack Seal Program
Project No:cpxxxx TIP #36
Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - -
Utility Tax - 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 1,400,000
REET - - - - - -
Bond proceeds - - - - - -
- 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 1,400,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 140,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 180,000 180,000 180,000 360,000 1,260,000
- 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 1,400,000
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - -
Utility Tax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Bond proceeds - - - - - -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000 -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Adopted Budget
Implement regular maintenance of various classified streets by sealing newly formed cracks. Sealing the cracks will prolong the life of
the pavement by stopping water from draining into the subbase of the road.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully extend pavement life pavement citywide.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
DI.K Page 323 of 335
Roadway Preservation Projects 71
LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program
Project No:Various TIP #37
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2012 YTD Actual 2013 12 Budget
Budget Expenditures Budget Balance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012 Estimate 2013 Budget 2014 Budget Project Total Cost
Local Street Fund - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Property Tax - 3,021,110 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,021,110 15,021,110
Utility Mitigation - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 3,021,110 3,000,000 2,000,000 6,021,110 16,021,110
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 521,110 500,000 200,000 1,021,110 2,021,110
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,800,000 5,000,000 14,000,000
- 3,021,110 3,000,000 2,000,000 6,021,110 16,021,110
Total Expenditures
2015 2016 2017 2018 2013-2018 Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Local Street Fund - - - - 1,000,000 -
Property Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 -
Utility Mitigation - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 13,000,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,500,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 11,500,000 -
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 13,000,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Adopted Budget
This program was created after passage of Proposition 1 on the November '04 ballot, setting the City's property tax levy limits and
creating a dedicated local street fund to be used solely for local street improvements. The program will focus on the preservation of local
streets (unclassified streets) within the City of Auburn. The work will include crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre-leveling, asphalt
overlays and roadway reconstruction. The property tax levy lift may also be used to repay bonds should they be utilized to fund this
program.
Progress Summary:
This program has successfully completed overlays, chip seals and complete reconstructions since 2005. The program will
focus on reconstruction in 2013 and 2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
DI.K Page 324 of 335
City of Auburn
2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program Summary
Project
Number
TIP
#Project Title Grant
Status Prior to 2013 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Beyond 2018 Total Project
Cost Project Category
c207A0 1 A St NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW)Secured 8,190,826 25,000 25,000 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 200,000 8,865,826 Roadway
cp1118 2 Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements
Dogwood to Fir Secured 192,000 748,830 - - - - - - 940,830 Roadway
c409A0 3 Auburn Way Imp (4th St NE to 4th St SE)Unsecured 78,251 - - - - 818,700 3,000,000 - 3,896,951 Roadway
C415A0 4 I St NE (45th St NE to S 277th St)Unsecured 161,827 - - - - - 6,760,000 - 6,921,827 Roadway
C201A0 5 M St SE Grade Separation (3rd ST NE to 8th St SE)Secured 15,344,446 6,729,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 2,500,000 22,058,446 Roadway
C222A0 6 S 277th Street (AWN to Green River Bridge)Unsecured 121,785 1,024,300 1,453,000 5,170,000 - - - - 5,469,085 Roadway
cpxxxx 7 15th St SW Reconstruction (C St SW to UPRR)Unsecured - - - - 375,000 3,000,000 - - 3,375,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 8 A St NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW)Unsecured 150,000 - - 150,000 - 3,000,000 - - 3,300,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 9 D St NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW)Unsecured - - - - - - 300,000 6,000,000 6,300,000 Roadway
CP0911 10 F St SE (4th St SE to AWS)Unsecured 7,620 - - 250,000 2,250,000 - - - 2,507,620 Roadway
cpxxxx 11 M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE)Unsecured - - 50,000 275,000 1,150,000 - - - 1,475,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 12 BNSF Railyard Grade-Separated Crossing Unsecured - - - - - - 1,125,000 31,000,000 32,125,000 Roadway
cp0767 13 Mohawk Plastics Site Wetland Mitigation N/A 681,150 25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 20,000 145,000 Miscellaneous
cpxxxx 15 8th St NE (Pike St to R St NE)Unsecured - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,450,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 16 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street
NE Unsecured - - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - - 3,350,000 Roadway
CP0611 17 Harvey/8th Street Imp - Debt Service N/A 1,993,900 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 84,800 826,000 1,731,800 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cp1104 18 8th St NE & R St NE Improvements (104th Ave SE U-
Turn)Secured 148,600 233,400 - - - - - - 382,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 19 Auburn Way North/1 Street NE Signal Imp Unsecured - - 50,000 - 550,000 - - 50,000 600,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 20 Auburn Way South and M Street SE Unsecured 100,000 150,000 450,000 - - - - - 700,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 21 C Street NW and West Main Street Unsecured - - 100,000 1,000,000 - - - - 1,100,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 22 West Valley Highway System Improvements Secured - 1,120,000 - - - - - - 1,120,000 Preservation
C229A0 23 BNSF/East Valley Hwy. Ped Undercrossing Unsecured 224,300 - - - - 4,800,000 5,000,000 - 10,024,300 Non-Motorized
cpxxxx 24 Academy Drive Multi Use Trail Unsecured - - - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 - 900,000 Non-Motorized
NA 26 Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttles N/A 220,000 240,000 240,000 250,000 250,000 260,000 260,000 - 1,720,000 Transit
cp1110 27 41st St SE and A St SE Access Management Study N/A 1,160 8,840 - - - - - - 10,000 Study
cpxxxx 28 Annual Bridge Maintenance N/A 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 350,000 Preservation
C410A0 29 S 277th Street -Wetland Mitigation N/A 269,317 25,000 25,000 - - - - - 319,317 Miscellaneous
Varies 30 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program N/A - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - - 300,000 Non-Motorized
Varies 31 Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Imp N/A - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000 Non-Motorized
Varies 32 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements N/A 235,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 - 835,000 Non-Motorized
Varies 34 Traffic Signal Improvement Programs N/A 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 - 1,225,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
Varies 35 Arterial Street Preservation N/A 1,551,500 1,300,000 1,800,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 9,851,500 Preservation
Varies 36 Arterial Street Crack Seal N/A 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,400,000 Preservation
Varies 37 Local Streets Preservation N/A 3,021,110 3,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 16,021,110 Preservation
cpxxxx 38 Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements Unsecured - - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - - 3,000,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 39 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 3 Unsecured - - - - 100,000 750,000 - - 850,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 40 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 1 Unsecured - 50,000 150,000 1,750,000 - - - - 1,950,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 41 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 2 Unsecured - - - 50,000 200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,250,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 42 SE 320th St Corridor Imp Unsecured - - - 50,000 60,000 580,000 - - 690,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 43 Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety
Improvements Secured - 250,000 2,083,108 - - - - - 2,333,108 Roadway
cpxxxx 44 A St NE Pedestrian Improvements Unsecured - - - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Non-Motorized
cpxxxx 45 Interurban Trailhead Improvements Unsecured - - - - 210,000 - - - 210,000 Non-Motorized
cpxxxx 46 104th Ave SE & Green River Study N/A - 5,000 - - - - - - 5,000 Study
cpxxxx 47 Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study N/A - - - - 5,000 - - - 5,000 Study
cpxxxx 48 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Imp Study N/A - 10,000 - - - - - - 10,000 Study
cpxxxx 49 S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Imp Study N/A - - - 5,000 - - - - 5,000 Study
cpxxxx 50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs Unsecured - - - 220,000 - 220,000 - - 440,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 51 East Valley Hwy ITS Expansion Unsecured - - - 800,000 - - - - 800,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 54 Kersey Way Study N/A - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Study
cp1120 56 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements Secured 35,777 363,500 - - - - - - 399,277 Non-Motorized
cp1119 58 AWS Corridor Imp (Fir to Hemlock)Secured 701,902 2,331,947 - - - - - - 3,033,849 Roadway
cp1023 59 Auburn Ave NE & 3rd St NE Pedestrian & Access
Improvements Unsecured 8,538 15,000 200,000 700,500 - - - - 924,038 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 60 M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)Unsecured - - - - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - - 6,675,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 62 AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street
SE)
Unsecured - - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 - - 4,750,000 Roadway
cpxxxx 63 29th Street SE & R Street SE Unsecured - - - - - - 1,800,000 - 1,800,000 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
cpxxxx 67 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Project Secured 2,500 405,000 - - - - - - 407,500 Intersection, Signal &
ITS
Total 33,866,509 18,791,717 9,547,608 16,676,500 18,165,600 28,428,900 22,909,800 40,596,000 181,258,384
7/10/2012 Page 1DI.K Page 325 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Capital Project Status Report
Date:
July 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Capital Project Status Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached report.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.L
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.L Page 326 of 335
D
a
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
1
CP
1
0
0
6
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
6
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
ne
w
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Ar
e
a
o
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
C
t
.
S
E
2,
6
6
9
,
8
7
7
2,
6
6
9
,
8
7
7
2
,
5
6
2
,
2
7
5
1
0
0
%
M
a
r
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
i
n
p
r
o
ce
s
s
.
2
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
B
,
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
s
e
w
e
r
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
.
2,
9
5
5
,
5
6
9
2,
9
5
5
,
5
6
9
2
,
8
8
6
,
4
2
0
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
9
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
Pu
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
a
r
e
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
re
m
a
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
to
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
J
u
l
y
.
3
CP
0
9
1
6
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
-
S
R
1
8
t
o
W
.
M
a
i
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
W
V
H
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
1
8
an
d
W
.
M
a
i
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
W.
M
a
i
n
.
87
0
,
0
0
0
80
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
3
4
5
,
6
5
0
(T
I
B
G
r
a
n
t
)
83
,
7
1
0
(1
2
4
F
u
n
d
)
4,
0
9
9
,
3
6
0
4
,
0
4
1
,
9
1
6
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
1
9
9
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Wo
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
an
d
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
J
u
l
y
.
4
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
C
,
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
re
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
s
t
o
r
m
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
2,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
4
,
5
9
3
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
0
9
9
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
Pu
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
a
r
e
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
re
m
a
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
to
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
.
5
CP
1
0
0
5
So
u
t
h
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
P
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
o
n
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
Ma
i
n
S
t
t
o
3
r
d
S
t
S
E
/
S
W
.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
a
l
l
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
n
e
w
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(E
D
A
)
4,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
s
)
7,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
6
,
3
8
9
,
7
5
2
1
0
0
%
M
a
r
-
1
1
9
9
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pu
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
b
u
t
i
s
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
de
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
6
C4
1
0
A
S.
2
7
7
t
h
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
we
t
l
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
.
2
7
7
t
h
G
r
a
d
e
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
14
3
,
5
9
7
14
3
,
5
9
7
1
4
3
,
3
7
4
1
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
1
9
8
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
1
-
ye
a
r
p
l
a
n
t
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
pe
r
i
o
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
d
a
t
e
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
No
r
t
h
g
e
o
d
e
c
k
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
44
t
h
S
t
N
W
a
n
d
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
.
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
th
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
1
0
y
e
a
r
s
.
pe
r
i
o
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
d
a
t
e
ha
s
b
e
e
n
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
i
s
.
7
CP
0
9
0
9
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
or
d
e
r
t
o
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
2,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2
,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
4
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Wo
r
k
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
re
s
u
m
e
i
n
J
u
l
y
a
n
d
i
s
aw
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
C
A
D
A
p
a
n
e
l
be
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
SC
A
D
A
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
8
C2
0
7
A
'A
'
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
pe
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
‘
A
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
f
r
o
m
1
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
so
u
t
h
t
o
3
r
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
.
1
,
2
0
2
,
5
2
6
(1
0
2
a
n
d
TI
F
)
40
5
,
9
9
3
1
2
,
1
8
8
6
,
5
8
0
,
7
4
0
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
s
)
1,
2
8
5
,
1
7
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
In
-
K
i
n
d
)
40
7
,
5
6
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
9,
8
9
4
,
1
7
7
9
,
6
5
4
,
0
0
9
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
1
8
8
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
G
a
u
b
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
3r
d
t
o
5
t
h
i
s
o
p
e
n
t
o
l
o
c
a
l
tr
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
l
y
u
n
t
i
l
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ro
a
d
w
a
y
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
no
r
t
h
e
r
n
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
T
h
e
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
is
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
o
p
e
n
i
n
Su
m
m
e
r
o
f
2
0
1
2
.
9
CP
1
1
1
6
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
t
e
a
l
l
i
g
h
t
s
th
a
t
h
a
v
e
r
e
a
c
h
e
d
t
h
e
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
l
i
f
e
wi
t
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
)
48
5
,
0
0
0
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
7
7
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
Wo
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
,
wa
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
fo
r
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
9
l
i
g
h
t
s
o
n
Sa
f
e
w
a
y
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
r
e
a
.
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
7
DI.L Page 327 of 335
D
a
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
10
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
re
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
a
c
a
d
e
m
y
d
r
i
v
e
Se
,
3
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
,
a
n
d
3
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
23
2
,
4
0
0
2
3
2
,
4
0
0
2
1
9
,
0
9
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
7
0
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
L
e
e
Wo
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
is
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
i
n
Ju
l
y
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
w
o
r
k
o
n
37
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
11
C5
2
4
A
SC
A
D
A
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
S
C
A
D
A
s
y
s
t
e
m
to
m
e
e
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
g
o
a
l
s
.
2,
6
6
6
,
2
0
0
1
,
9
9
4
,
5
0
0
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
5
,
6
7
4
,
7
0
0
4
,
9
9
8
,
5
1
2
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
0
9
6
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
L
e
e
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
.
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
ar
e
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
a
t
M
&
O
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
t
e
s
t
s
i
t
e
s
b
e
g
a
n
t
h
e
we
e
k
o
f
J
u
l
y
9
t
h
.
12
C2
0
1
A
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
(
G
r
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
d
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
‘M
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
B
u
r
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
a
n
t
a
Fe
S
t
a
m
p
e
d
e
P
a
s
s
R
a
i
l
l
i
n
e
i
n
P
h
a
s
e
1
a
n
d
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
B
l
a
c
k
D
i
a
m
o
n
d
R
o
a
d
By
p
a
s
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
h
a
s
e
.
5,
1
6
6
,
5
6
0
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
8
7
2
,
3
7
2
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
)
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
M
S
I
B
)
2,
8
5
6
,
6
1
1
(T
I
B
)
1,
3
3
5
,
0
7
9
(K
i
n
g
C
t
y
)
1,
5
4
2
,
8
0
0
(P
o
r
t
s
)
47
8
,
0
0
0
(B
N
S
F
)
1,
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
(R
E
E
T
2
)
2,
7
7
2
,
7
5
2
(P
W
T
F
)
22
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
2
2
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
2
3
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
o
a
d
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
i
n
pl
a
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
20
1
3
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
4t
h
a
n
d
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
r
e
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
7
/
2
3
fo
r
4
w
e
e
k
s
.
B
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
wo
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
w
a
l
l
s
a
n
d
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
b
o
r
e
s
u
n
d
e
r
SR
1
8
a
n
d
t
h
e
R
R
f
o
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
(P
W
T
F
)
13
CP
1
1
0
3
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
I
n
t
e
r
t
i
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
o
n
1
3
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
a
n
d
t
h
e
T
a
c
o
m
a
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
pu
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
.
1,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
7
5
,
6
3
8
1
0
0
%
F
e
b
-
1
2
1
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
Ta
c
o
m
a
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
t
h
e
fi
r
s
t
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
w
o
r
k
.
14
CP
1
2
0
6
20
1
2
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
,
a
n
d
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
ch
i
p
s
e
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
w
o
r
k
o
n
b
o
t
h
ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
(S
O
S
)
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
3
9
4
,
2
1
4
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
s
t
h
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
2
0
1
2
S
O
S
n
o
n
-
re
b
u
i
l
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
20
1
2
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Pr
e
-
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
is
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
f
o
r
7
/
1
9
.
15
CP
0
9
2
1
Bi
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
&
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
se
w
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
m
a
n
h
o
l
e
s
,
p
i
p
e
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
11
7
,
0
0
0
8
3
5
,
6
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
9
5
7
,
6
3
5
8
5
3
,
9
8
5
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
L
e
e
Wo
r
k
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
g
i
n
i
n
M
i
d
J
u
l
y
.
16
CP
1
1
0
8
20
1
1
/
1
2
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
o
n
d
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
se
d
i
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
8
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
p
o
n
d
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
t
h
e
di
t
c
h
a
l
o
n
g
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
/
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
.
1
36
0
,
0
0
0
3
6
0
,
0
0
0
3
3
5
,
8
0
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
O
c
t
-
1
2
L
e
e
St
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
re
j
e
c
t
i
n
g
a
l
l
b
i
d
s
a
n
d
r
e
-
bi
d
d
i
n
g
.
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
7
DI.L Page 328 of 335
D
a
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
17
EM
0
9
0
2
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
Re
m
o
v
a
l
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
5
m
i
l
e
s
o
f
te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
i
n
2
0
0
9
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
di
m
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
H
a
n
s
o
n
Da
m
.
1
2
,
1
4
0
,
6
9
4
(K
C
F
C
D
)
2,
1
4
0
,
6
9
4
2
,
1
2
9
,
2
2
2
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
d
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
op
e
n
b
i
d
s
o
n
7
/
1
7
.
18
CP
1
2
1
1
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
S
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
G
a
r
d
e
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
r
o
t
a
t
i
n
g
sc
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
g
a
r
d
e
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
ar
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
up
t
o
1
0
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
s
a
s
t
h
e
bu
d
g
e
t
a
l
l
o
w
s
.
A
r
t
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
d
o
n
e
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
A
r
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
w
i
t
h
th
e
P
a
r
k
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
(L
R
F
)
10
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
e
r
a
l
fu
n
d
)
60
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
N
o
v
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
d
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
op
e
n
b
i
d
s
o
n
7
/
2
4
.
19
CP
1
1
1
2
20
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
of
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
t
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
N
o
v
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
7
/
1
2
an
d
o
p
e
n
b
i
d
s
7
/
2
6
.
20
CP
0
9
0
9
Ac
a
d
e
m
y
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
1
3
,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3
,
0
2
2
,
5
0
0
9
7
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Re
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
21
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Li
n
e
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
an
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
S
i
t
e
t
o
1
1,
4
2
4
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
1,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
1,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
65
%
Au
g
-
1
2
Ja
n
-
1
3
Le
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
21
CP
0
9
1
5
an
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
S
i
t
e
t
o
th
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
W
e
l
l
1
.
T
h
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
l
i
n
e
o
n
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
1
,
4
2
4
,
0
0
0
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
1
,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
6
5
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
J
a
n
-
1
3
L
e
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
un
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
th
e
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
.
22
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
H
i
-
C
r
e
s
t
D
r
i
v
e
N
W
1
16
5
,
0
0
0
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
1
7
8
,
3
1
0
3
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
b
u
t
is
n
o
t
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
un
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
i
s
ye
a
r
.
23
CP
1
1
0
7
Fu
l
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
T
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
ph
a
s
e
1
A
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
F
u
l
m
e
r
We
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
a
r
e
a
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
an
d
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
f
u
l
l
wa
t
e
r
r
i
g
h
t
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
1
B
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
te
s
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
2
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
9
7
,
3
6
4
1
7
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
L
a
m
o
t
h
e
Th
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
fo
r
t
h
e
P
h
a
s
e
1
A
o
n
l
y
a
n
d
wi
l
l
b
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
i
s
ph
a
s
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
24
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
W
e
l
l
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
W
e
l
l
1
s
o
th
a
t
i
t
c
a
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
t
f
u
l
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
o
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
1
1
,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1
,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
un
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
2
0
1
3
.
25
CP
1
1
2
0
Le
a
H
i
l
l
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
sa
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
H
a
z
e
l
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
.
,
L
e
a
Hi
l
l
e
l
e
m
.
,
a
n
d
R
a
i
n
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
l
o
n
g
11
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
E
a
n
d
S
E
3
1
2
S
t
.
,
1
3
9
8
,
5
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
21
,
5
9
7
(A
S
D
)
42
0
,
0
9
7
4
2
0
,
0
9
7
1
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
20
1
3
t
o
b
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
su
m
m
e
r
.
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
a
n
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
A
S
D
f
o
r
th
e
i
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
.
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
7
DI.L Page 329 of 335
D
a
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
26
CP
1
2
1
5
Ba
n
n
e
r
P
o
l
e
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
a
i
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
ba
n
n
e
r
p
o
l
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
N
E
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
E
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
B
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
.
1
3
0
,
0
0
0
(3
2
8
)
30
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
N
o
v
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
ay
27
CP
1
1
1
8
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
t
o
F
i
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
i
s
l
a
n
d
,
a
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
m
i
d
-
0
b
l
o
c
k
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
,
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
p
o
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
T
h
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
1
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
4
0
,
8
3
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
94
0
,
8
3
0
9
4
0
,
8
3
0
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
28
CP
1
1
1
9
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
F
i
r
S
t
.
S
E
t
o
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
SE
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
w
i
d
e
n
A
W
S
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
F
i
r
a
n
d
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
r
o
m
3
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
5
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
e
w
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
1
8
4
9
2
,
4
2
6
,
4
0
0
(T
I
B
)
60
6
,
6
0
0
(M
I
T
)
3,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
3
,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
29
CP
0
7
6
5
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
th
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
2
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
5
%
J
u
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
Hi
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
In
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
f
o
r
ea
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
30
CP
1
0
2
4
AW
S
a
n
d
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
75
,
0
0
0
9
7
5
,
0
0
0
1
5
%
Ju
n
-
1
2
Pr
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
On
l
y
TB
D
T
r
u
o
n
g
ea
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
AW
S
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
o
n
t
o
M
S
t
.
S
E
(C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
17
t
h
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
e
f
t
tu
r
n
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
1
7
t
h
t
o
M.
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
P
r
e
-
De
s
i
g
n
-
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
ul
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
W
S
t
o
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
M
S
t
.
S
E
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
,
an
d
b
i
k
e
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
A
W
S
.
C
o
s
t
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
O
p
t
i
o
n
2
.
31
CP
0
9
0
6
20
0
9
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
i
g
n
a
t
Ea
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
a
n
d
L
a
k
e
T
a
p
p
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
3
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
F
u
n
d
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
L
e
e
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
o
n
ho
l
d
.
32
CP
0
6
2
4
We
l
l
5
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
w
e
l
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
a
n
d
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
ca
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
3
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
75
1
,
9
0
0
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
0
%
J
a
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
c
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
33
C5
1
2
A
We
l
l
4
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
h
o
u
s
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
b
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
s
t
a
f
f
.
3
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
63
0
,
0
0
0
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
J
u
l
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
c
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
7
DI.L Page 330 of 335
D
a
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
34
C2
2
9
A
BN
S
F
/
E
V
H
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
U
n
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
b
o
t
h
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
(
A
S
t
SE
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
N
S
F
r
a
i
l
t
r
a
c
k
s
j
u
s
t
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
Wh
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
.
3
3
8
5
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
38
5
,
0
0
0
9
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
n
h
o
l
d
pe
n
d
i
n
g
B
N
S
F
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
de
s
i
g
n
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
pe
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
O
T
A
L
9
,
0
58
,
5
3
2
1
9
,
9
9
1
,
9
2
7
5
,
7
8
5
,
7
0
4
5
,
1
4
5
,
1
5
9
4
2
,
6
9
5
,
9
2
5
8
2
,
6
7
7
,
2
6
6
8
8
,
1
8
2
,
7
5
0
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
7
DI.L Page 331 of 335
Da
t
e
:
J
u
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
To
t
a
l
SO
S
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
0
3
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
20
1
1
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
35
CP
1
1
0
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
Ph
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
pa
t
c
h
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
o
f
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
a
n
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
9
3
,
3
4
9
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
1
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
36
CP
1
1
2
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
Ph
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
2
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
6
t
h
P
l
N
E
o
f
f
o
f
6
t
h
S
t
,
2
n
d
S
t
.
NE
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
R
S
t
a
n
d
O
S
t
,
H
S
t
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
n
d
St
.
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
,
a
n
d
G
/
3
r
d
S
t
S
W
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
i
n
an
d
E
S
t
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
0
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
1
,
9
6
8
,
3
0
7
1
,
5
2
6
,
6
2
1
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
9
8
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
i
n
g
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
.
2,
8
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
3
,
7
6
8
,
3
0
7
3
,
0
1
9
,
9
7
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
20
1
2
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
37
CP
1
2
0
1
20
1
2
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
J
S
t
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
n
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
2
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
n
d
R
S
t
.
S
E
2
7
t
h
/
H
/
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
E
a
s
t
o
f
F
S
t
.
S
E
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
m
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
6
8
9
,
5
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
2
,
3
0
8
,
0
8
0
1
,
5
6
4
,
7
2
7
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Pr
e
-
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
fo
r
7
/
1
9
.
Ot
h
e
r
S
O
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
CP
1
2
0
6
,
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
s
20
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
F
o
r
s
t
a
t
u
s
s
e
e
C
P
1
2
0
6
1,
8
8
9
,
5
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
2
,
5
0
8
,
0
8
0
1
,
7
6
4
,
7
2
7
T
O
T
A
L
S
O
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
0
1
1
&
2
0
1
2
4
,
7
1
0
,
5
8
0
8
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
5
4
3
,
9
0
0
-
6
,
2
7
6
,
3
8
7
4
,
7
8
4
,
6
9
7
SO
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
:
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
20
1
1
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
:
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
.
20
1
1
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
7
DI.L Page 332 of 335
Da
t
e
:
Ju
l
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
St
a
f
f
Ac
t
i
o
n
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
#
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Bu
d
g
e
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
St
a
t
u
s
A
MS
1
1
1
0
Ja
c
o
b
s
e
n
T
r
e
e
F
a
r
m
a
n
d
F
i
e
l
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
De
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
d
e
m
o
l
i
s
h
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
l
oc
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
Ja
c
o
b
s
e
n
T
r
e
e
F
a
r
m
a
n
d
o
n
t
h
e
F
i
e
l
d
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
14
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
M
S
C
F
i
n
a
l
A
c
ce
p
t
a
n
c
e
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
7
/
1
6
B
CP
1
2
1
0
Au
b
u
r
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
u
m
a
n
e
S
o
c
i
e
t
y
S
i
t
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
,
w
a
t
er
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
se
w
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
oc
a
t
e
d
a
t
49
1
0
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
a
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
nt
w
i
t
h
Au
b
u
r
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
u
m
a
n
e
S
o
c
i
e
t
y
.
17
9
,
4
9
0
$
1
7
9
,
4
5
7
$
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
M
S
C
Bi
d
s
o
l
i
c
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
g
a
n
6
/
2
8
a
n
d
bi
d
s
w
i
l
l
o
p
e
n
7
/
1
2
.
C
CP
1
1
1
5
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
N
W
P
l
a
z
a
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
t
h
e
N
W
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
Ha
l
l
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
th
e
r
e
c
e
n
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
C
i
t
y
H
al
l
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
n
e
w
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
A
D
A
R
a
m
p
u
p
gr
a
d
e
s
an
d
n
e
w
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
47
5
,
9
7
7
$
4
5
8
,
5
7
0
$
9
9
%
T
B
D
T
B
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
l
y
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
a
y
b
e
p
u
t
o
n
ho
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Ic
o
n
i
c
P
a
v
i
l
i
o
n
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
.
D
CP
0
6
1
6
Wa
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
-
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
d
o
w
n
t
o
wn
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Ki
o
s
k
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
u
p
t
o
9
l
o
c
a
t
io
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
10
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
6
,
0
5
0
$
5
2
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Fe
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
K
i
n
g
Co
u
n
t
y
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
f
r
o
m
3
G
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
m
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
fu
n
d
s
.
A
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
$
3
0
0
K
i
n
fu
n
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
W
I
R
A
9
i
n
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
OT
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
-
A
C
T
I
O
N
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
C
O
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
S
E
CP
1
0
1
6
Fe
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
n
e
w
l
e
v
e
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
F
e
n
s
t
e
r
Le
v
e
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
.
63
9
,
1
0
0
$
1
,
2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
%
N
/
A
A
p
r
-
1
4
A
n
d
e
r
s
e
n
P
C
D
C
pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
fu
n
d
w
h
i
c
h
g
o
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
F
l
o
o
d
Co
n
t
r
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
i
n
Ju
l
y
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
h
a
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
an
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
3
2
7
k
i
n
S
R
F
B
fu
n
d
i
n
g
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
n
'
t
b
e
f
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
un
t
i
l
t
h
i
s
f
a
l
l
.
P
r
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
F
MS
0
8
0
2
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
R
o
o
f
E
l
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
i
c
C
o
a
t
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
o
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
s
ne
e
d
e
d
.
20
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
2
B
u
r
k
e
M
S
C
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
d
7
/
1
1
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
op
e
n
b
i
d
s
7
/
2
5
.
Pa
g
e
7
o
f
7
DI.L Page 333 of 335
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Activities Matrix
Date:
July 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Public Works Committee Activities Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached matrix.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:July 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.M
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.M Page 334 of 335
No
.
It
e
m
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Ne
x
t
PW
C
Re
v
i
e
w
Da
t
e
Es
t
.
Co
m
p
.
Da
t
e
S
t
a
t
u
s
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
D
o
w
d
y
8
/
6
/
1
2
9
/
4
/
1
2
On
g
o
i
n
g
Po
l
i
c
y
di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
op
t
i
o
n
s
fo
r
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
ow
n
e
r
s
& co
s
t
of
ad
d
i
n
g
st
r
e
e
t
l
i
ght
s
.
B
F
i
e
l
d
Tr
i
p
to
Co
a
l
Cr
e
e
k
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
D
o
w
d
y
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
fo
r
Ju
l
y
24
t
h
.
C
Ha
r
v
e
y
Ro
a
d
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Re
p
a
i
r
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Pa
r
t
of
th
e
20
1
2
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
to
be
co
m
ple
t
e
d
th
i
s
Su
m
n
e
r
(se
e
Ca
pit
a
l
Pr
o
jec
t
St
a
t
u
s
Re
por
t
).
D
En
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
Ci
t
y
St
r
e
e
t
En
t
r
a
n
c
e
Co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
9
/
1
7
/
1
2
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
op
t
i
o
n
s
fo
r
en
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
i
n
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
‐
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Tr
a
c
k
i
n
g
Ma
t
r
i
x
Up
d
a
t
e
d
:
7/
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
8:
3
4
AM
DI.M Page 335 of 335