HomeMy WebLinkAbout4853RESOLUTION NO. 4 8 5 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE U S
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR WATER RESOURCES
INVESTIGATION
WHEREAS, the U S. Geological Survey (USGS) will be conducting a study and
mapping project to address groundwater available and sustainability; and
WHEREAS, the USGS has offered to allow local jurisdictions to participate in the
scoping of the project and will provide access to and copies of the database in return for
the participating jurisdictions sharing the cost of the project; and
WHEREAS, the groundwater model developed by USGS can be used by the City
to make water resouce decisions related to water rights and watey supply for the City's
Water Utility; and
WHEREAS, City of Auburn staff recommends that the City participate in the
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an
Agreement between the City and the U S Geological Survey for Water Resource
Investigations, which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
Resolution No. 4853
August 28, 2012
Page 1 of 2
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day ofd= l 2012.
OF
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
B. Heid City
Resolution No. 4853
August 28, 2012
Page 2 of 2
MAYOR
Form 9-1366
(Oct. 2005)
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
Joint Funding Agreement
Customer#:
Pending/FY12-14
Agreement #-
12WNWA20097
Project #:
YGOOEY0
TIN #•
Pending
Fixed Cost
r
Agreement
Yes No
FOR
WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 31th,day of August, 2012, by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, party of the first part, and the CITY OF AUBURN
PUBLIC WORKS
party of the second part.
The parties hereto agree that subject to availability of appropriations and in accordance with their
respective authorities there shall be maintained in cooperation a fixed-price agreement to
characterize the groundwater flow system in the Puyallup River Watershed, King and Pierce
Counties, Washington. A detailed proposal describing the scope of work is enclosed and is
considered a part of this agreement, herein called the program. The USGS legal authority is 43 USC
36Q 43 USC 50; and 43 USC 50b
2. The following amounts shall be contributed to cover all of the cost of the necessary field and analytical
work directly related to this program. 2(b) includes in -Kind Services in the amount of $ N/A.
by the party of the first part during the period
(a) $45,000 August 31, 2012 to SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
by the party of the second part during the period
(b) $45,000 August 31, 2012 to SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
(c) Additional or reduced amounts by each party during the above period or succeeding periods as may be
determined by mutual agreement and set forth in an exchange of letters between the parties.
(d) The performance period may be changed by mutual agreement and set forth in an exchange of letters
between the parties.
3 The costs of this program may be paid by either party in conformity with the laws and regulations respectively
governing each party
4. The field and analytical work pertaining to this program shall be under the direction of or subject to periodic
review by an authorized representative of the party of the first part.
5. The areas to be included in the program shall be determined by mutual agreement between the parties
hereto or their authorized representatives. The methods employed in the field and office s_ hall be those
adopted by the party of the first part to insure the required standards of accuracy subject to modification by
mutual agreement.
6. During the course of this program, all field and analytical work of either party pertaining to this program shall
be open to the inspection of the other party, and if the work is not being carried on in a mutually satisfactory
manner, either party may terminate this agreement upon 60 days written notice to the other party
7 The original records resulting from this program will be deposited in the office of origin of those records. Upon
request, copies of the original records will be provided to the office of the other party
8. The maps, records, or reports resulting from this program shall be made available to the public as promptly
as possible The maps, records, or reports normally will be published by the party of the first part. However,
the party of the second part reserves the right to publish the results of this program and, if already published
by the party of the first part shall, upon request, be furnished by the party of the first part, at costs,
impressions suitable for purposes of reproduction similar to that for which the original copy was prepared.
The maps, records, or reports published by either party shall contain a statement of the cooperative relations
between the parties.
USGS will issue billings utilizing Department of the Interior Bill for Collection (form DI -1040). Billing
documents are to be rendered QUARTERLY Payments of bills are due within 60 days after the billing date. If
not paid by the due date, interest will be charged at the current Treasury rate for each 30 day period, or
portion thereof, that the payment is delayed beyond the due date. (31 USC 3717; Comptroller General File 6-
212222, August 23, 1983)_
U.S. Geological Survey
United States
Department of the interior
USGS Point of Contact
Name:
Mark Savoca
Name:
Address:
USGSNVWSC
Address:
934 Broadway Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98402
Telephone:
253-552-1660
Telephone:
Email:
mesavocaCoous_s.gs.g_ov
Email:
Signatures
i
By ± `c_ '11?,— Date Y 7-l'1--
Name: Cynthia Barton, Ph.D., L.G., L.H.G.
Title: Director, USGS Washington Water
Science Center
Date
Name:
Title:
Name:
Title:
Name:
Title:
Name of Customer
City of Auburn, Public Works
Customer Point of Contact
Dan Repp, Utilities Engineer
City of Auburn - Public Works
25 W Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001
(253)804-5062
drepp@auburnwa.gov
Si tures
Date
SUMMARY
Characterization of the Groundwater Flow System in the Puyallup River
Watershed, King and Pierce Counties, Washington
A proposal prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the City of Auburn
August 21 2012
Problem — Groundwater is an important resource for domestic, commercial, and industrial
usage in the Puvallup River Watershed, and groundwater discharge helps maintain late -summer
and early -fall streamflow (baseflow) in many area streams. Consequently, as the population
grows, and commercial and industrial activity increase, so does the demand for groundwater
However, the quantity of usable groundwater, and the potential effects of future natural
conditions and anthropogenic activities on groundwater resources, as well as potential impacts to
streamflow, are not well understood in the watershed. Additional information is required to help
ensure the long-term sustainability of the area s groundwater resources, identify groundwater
recharge areas, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas.
Objective —The objectives of the study are to: 1) characterize the groundwater flow system,
and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River Watershed; it is
anticipated that this and other information will be integrated into a numerical groundwater flow
model to contribute to an improved understanding of water resources in the watershed; and
2) continue using and refining a previously developed project Action Plan to guide the project
and provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect groundwater resources using
the model developed from this project and assist water resource managers and water purveyors
with regional water management planning and decision-making.
Relevance and Benefits—This study directly supports USGS mission and goals related to
water -resource issues identified in the USGS Science Strategy The study addresses groundwater
availability and sustainability a priority issue under the Water Census of the United States as
outlined in Facing Tomorrows challenges: USGS Science in the Decade 2007-2017 This study
also will provide resource managers and stake holders in the Puyallup River watershed with the
means to evaluate potential hydrologic and anthropogenic impacts on groundwater and surface -
water resources, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas. This study is
appropriate for inclusion in the USGS Cooperative Program because it will provide information
that advances understanding of hydrologic processes.
Approach — Available groundwater and surface -water data will be compiled and evaluated to
construct hydrogeologic unit extent and thickness maps for all unconsolidated aquifer and
confining units in the groundwater -flow system, and to delineate gaining and losing river
reaches. All groundwater and surface -water data will be verified and entered into the USGS
National Water Information System data base, Estimates of water use and groundwater recharge
will be conducted, and groundwater -level maps will be constructed.
Characterization of the Groundwater Flow System in the Puyallup River
Watershed, King and Pierce Counties, Washington
A proposal prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the City of Auburn
August 21 2012
Background —The Puyallup River Watershed (PRW) occupies a 1,053 square -mile area in
King and Pierce Counties, in western Washington (fig. 1). The north to northwest flowing
Puyallup River, and several major tributaries (the White and Carbon Rivers) originate within
sparsely populated mountains of the Cascade Range to the east and traverse suburban, urban, and
industrial areas before discharging to Puget Sound to the west. The watershed is underlain by a
westward thickening sequence of unconsolidated Quaternary glacial and interglacial deposits.
underlain by Tertiary and older sedimentary volcanic. and metamorphic bedrock units. Major
population centers within the watershed include the cities of Tacoma. Puyallup, Aubum. Kent.
Sumner, and Orting.
Problem — Groundwater is an important resource for domestic. commercial, and industrial
usage in the PRW, and groundwater discharge helps maintain late -summer and early -fall
streamflow (baseflow) in area streams. Consequently as the population grows, and commercial
and industrial activity increase, so dues the demand for groundwater however, the quantity of
usable groundwater and the potential effects of future natural conditions and anthropogenic
activities on groundwater resources, as well as potential impacts of groundwater withdrawals on
stream flow, are not well understood in the watershed. Additional information is required to help
ensure the long-term sustainability of the area's groundwater and surface -water resources,
identify groundwater recharge areas, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas.
Objective — The objectives of the study are to: 1) characterize the groundwater flow system,
and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River Watershed; it is
anticipated that this and other information will be integrated into a numerical groundwater flow
model to contribute to an improved understanding of water resources in the watershed; and
2) continue using and refining a previously developed project action plan to guide the project and
provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect groundwater resources using the
model developed from this project and assist water resource managers and water purveyors with
regional water management planning and decision-making.
Relevance and Benefits —This study directly supports USGS mission and goals related to
water -resource issues identified in the USGS Science Strategy The study addresses groundwater
availability and sustainability a priority issue under the Water Census of the United States as
outlined in Facing Tomorrow's challenges. USGS Science in the Decade 2007-2017 This study
also will provide resource managers and stake holders in the Puyallup River watershed with the
means to evaluate potential hydrologic and anthropogenic impacts on groundwater and surface -
water resources, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas. This study is
appropriate for inclusion in the USGS Cooperative Program because it will provide information
that advances understanding of hydrologic processes.
Approach — Available groundwater and surface -water data will be compiled and evaluated to
construct hydrogeologic unit extent and thickness maps for all unconsolidated aquifer and
confining units in the groundwater -flow system, and to delineate gaining and losing river
reaches. All groundwater and surface -water data will be verified and entered into the USGS
National Water Information System data base. Estimates of water use and groundwater recharge
will be conducted, and groundwater -level maps will be constructed. All currently available data
will be compiled to evaluate its accuracy and will be entered in the USGS NWIS groundwater
site inventory and surface water databases (GWSI and ADAPS). The study area is within the
Puget Sound Regional Aquifer System, which was described at a regional scale by Vaccaro and
others (1998), and a portion of the study area along the lower Puyallup River was described by
Jones and others (1999). Data to be compiled will include: a) information describing the areal
extent, thickness, and lithologic composition of aquifers and confining units, groundwater levels,
aquifer boundary conditions, and the spatial distribution of aquifer hvdraulic properties, b) land -
use coverages; c) aquifer recharge data (precipitation, leakage from surface -water features.
anthropogenic return flows, and inflows from adjacent areas): d) aquifer discharge data
(withdrawals from wells, baseflow to surface -water features, evapotranspiration estimates, and
undertlow to adjacent units); and e) streamflow lake -level, and dam operation records for the
study -area to identify possible trends and delineate gaining and losing stream reaches.
A spatially oriented project database(s) for storage, evaluation, and analysis of currently
available information for the study area will be established using a combination of GIS and data
management and analysis software (ArcGIS, G WSI, ctc.). The database will integrate
information from multiple sources, and will be continually populated with new data as they
become available. All data will be checked for accuracy in accordance with the USGS
Washington Water Science Center QA/QC Plan for ground -water activities (Drost, 2005). The
database will contain information about geology hydrology, water use. and land use in the study
area, and will be accessible to all project members.
A groundwater monitoring network has been established and stream baseflow has been
measured as part of a separate but related study being conducted by the USGS in cooperation
with stake holders in theTRW, and these data will be available for use in this study and
eventually will be integrated into the numerical flow model of the watershed. The plan for
collecting these data is briefly described below
— Establish Groundwater Monitoring Network (FY 12-13) — A well -records inventory and a field
inventory (well location and access permission) of 245 wells was conducted and selected wells
(4 wells) were instrumented with continuous water -level recorders. A monthly groundwater -level
monitoring network (I 10 wells) was established and will be operated for 2 years. All water=level
data are reviewed for accuracy, and entered into the USGS database (GWSI).
— Conduct Stream Baseflow Measurements (FY 12-13) — Stream baseflow measurements were
made to delineate gaining and losing stream reaches. Baseflow measurements were conducted
(October 201 1) at 36 sites to augment the 14 USGS surface -water gaging stations currently
operating in the study area. Measurements were made during low -flow conditions to document
the exchange of water between aquifers and streams. A second baseflow measurement is
scheduled for September/October of 2012. All baseflow measurements are reviewed for
accuracy, and entered into the USGS database (ADAPS).
An overview of the specific tasks needed to complete each element of the study is presented
below A project timeline and budget are given at the end of this document. The project duration
is expected to be approximately 2.5 years. An Action Plan was developed by the USGS and
Pierce Conservation District in close cooperation with the Washington State Department of
Health to guide the study and provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect
groundwater resources using the PRW model and assist water resource managers and water
purveyors with regional water management planning and decision-making. The Action Plan is
given at the end of this document, the implementation schedule is provided in a separate
attachment.
Task 1.0 hydrogeologic Framework (FYI 2-13)— The interpretation of the hydrogeologic
framework of the PRW will be based primarily on existing maps of surficial geology and the
Iilhologic information from drillers logs. Eight to ten hydrogeologic cross sections will be
constructed for the study area. After the sections are constructed and the major hydrogeologic
units have been identified, maps of the extent and thicknesses of the major units will be
constructed. Hydraulic properties will be estimated for hydrogeologic units using available data
from aquifer tests, drillers' reports (specific capacity tests), and published values.
Task 2.0 Estimate Water Use (FY 13) — Current and historical water -use information will be
obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Washington State Department of
Agriculture and water purveyors located within the PRW Census records, per capita estimates of
water use in King County (Lane, 2009), and land -use coverages will be used to estimate exempt
(unregulated) uses including lawns, parks and cemeteries. non-commercial gardens, and small-
scale industrial uses.
Task 3.0 Estimate Groundwater Recharge (FY 13) —The distribution of groundwater recharge
from precipitation will be estimated by applying precipitation -recharge relations based on
regression equations developed for areas in Washington State by Bidlake and Payne (2001), that
incorporate the effects of surficial characteristics such as surficial hydrogeology and land cover
Recharge estimates will be compared to previously published values (Vaccaro and others, 1998.
Jones and others, 1999).
Task 4.0 Construct Water -Level Maps (FY 13-14) — Construction of water -level maps for major
aquifers in the PRW will be based primarily on data from a monthly groundwater -level
monitoring network established as part of a separate but related USGS study in the PRW (see
Approach for a brief description of this work). Water -level maps will provide information about
groundwater flow directions. and horizontal and vertical groundwater gradients.
Task 5,0 Conceptual Model and Report (FY 13-14) – A report summarizing the conceptual
model of the PRW will be prepared and published by March 31 2013 The USGS Publication
Service Center (PSC) will provide illustration. editorial, and publishing services. The conceptual
model report will include descriptions of. a) information describing the extent and thickness, and
lilhologic composition of major aquifers and confining units, aquifer boundary conditions, and
the spatial distribution of aquifer hydraulic properties, b) groundwater movement as it relates to
aquifers, aquitards, and surface -water features, c) land -use coverages; d) aquifer recharge data
(precipitation, leakage from surface -water features. anthropogenic return flows, and inflows from
tributary basins and adjacent uplands); e) aquifer discharge data (withdrawals from wells,
baseflow to surface -water features. and underflow to adjacent units and Puget Sound); and f)
streamflow and lake -level records for the PRW to identify possible trends and delineate gaining
and losing stream reaches.
Budget —The project will cost $490,400 over three fiscal years (FY 2012-2014). Project costs
will be shared equally by the USGS and our project partners. Current funding partners include:
City of Tacoma. City of Puyallup, City of Sumner, Cascade Water Alliance, Lakehaven Utility
District, Summit Water & Supply Company, The Russell Family Foundation, and Washington
State Department of Health. The portion of project costs to be provided by the City of Auburn is
$45,000.
Funding Sources —
Agency
FY2012
FV2013
FY2014
USGS
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
City of Auburn
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
Total
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
Timelines and Report Products —The USGS will prepare and publish a Scientific
Investigations Report describing the hydrogeologic framework, groundwater movement, and
water budget for the study area. The report will be published by September 30, 2014 The USGS
will provide annual project updates to all project partners describing project progress and any
issues relating to the completion of specific project tasks. A project website will be established
and maintained for the duration of the study A time line for the project is provided in the table
below
Calendar Year
c
2012
2013
2014
Federal Fiscal Year
2012
2013
2014
Quarter starting
'�'
O
'
¢�,
ht,^;
O
<
'
o,,
Task 1.0 Hydrogeologic'
: -'X` '
tramework
X•'
X
Task 2.0 Estimate water
-'_
^,'
use
_-z
i•,_
'I ask 3.0 Estimate`:
,sa
X
X
Groundwater rechar e
' --
-�---
.z..=•
"
j`' -
..
- "
X
XA •
Task 4.0 Water -level maps
Task 5.0 Conceptual
_
ft,
X ;
mX'
k'":
model report
References
Bidlake, W. R-, and Payne. K.L., 2001, Estimating recharge to ground water from precipitation at
Naval Submarine Base Bangor and Vicinity, Kitsap County, Washington: U.S Geological Survey
Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4110, 33 p.
Drost. B.W Quality -assurance plan for ground -water activities, U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington Water Science Center- U.S. Geological Survey Open -tile Report 2005 -1126 -online
only, 27 p.
Jones, M.A. Orr, L.A., Ebbert. J.C., and Sumioka, S.S., 1999 Ground -water hydrology of the
Tacoma -Puyallup area, Pierce County, Washington: U S. Geological Survey Water -Resources
Investigations Report 99-4013, 154 p.
Lane. R.C., 2009, Estimated water use in Washington. 2005 U.S. Geological Survey Scientific
Investigations Report 2009-5128, 30 p.
Vaccaro. J.J., A.J Hansen, and M.S. Jones. 1998, Hydrogeologic framework for the Puget Sound
aquifer system, Washington and British Columbia: USGS Professional Paper 1424-D, 77 p.
@2°30' 122'15' 122' 121°45 121°30'
q D 5 10 15 20 MILES
l
1•" 0 5 0 15
0 5 I 20 2503 kILOh1ETERS
iy —12100496
12101100 � t1;gSNINCTON�
12096500r �:� !nk, r
17° p . Ta _ 1207JZ00 t�
75' is` 3a/P -.' 17099r00
TeOmne
° f ,iy-,^. - *" 4lnd dfnnaru+n\t° Greemvater
Puyallup -=i• ',. ,�+,s Pcf.'i�, ><��.
121021901 _12101500'':)I
"z n+iiW*'112D97500 \y'Z
12102075 . Ike�s}o,12 cR1209850 �jq
0 Ing
a°rf•."-^+ :: .w 4f : 'r: �T'if��,A�t }-5�F �, r, u .� '-i� ?tif' t ;�� ,9�' P
17°'f��j'li_+Y.1209QDib'm<`'1:'•-�.'°�y.�T"� 4i li tk `,.,•(s{�
'e'rte
r ,.. 'r(.
a.
� .'_N,l 4wf1'11 L'/ � PPxefT�`.+�'•'.Y.3'{iS
12032
EXPLANATION
OREAL-TI2AE SURFACE -WATER STATION 1 , i ��o
AWN REAL-TIME SURFACE VATER STATION45
..Ta-
16°
Figure I Map of'Puyallup River Watershed study area.
10
1•igure 2. Map of Puyallup River Watershed study area.
Action Plan: Puyallup River Watershed, King and Pierce
Counties, Washington
Prepared by Pierce Conservation District
April 26, 2012
Project Objectives —The objectives of the project are to characterize the groundwater flow
system, and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River
Watershed, and integrate this information into a numerical flow model to contribute to an
improved understanding of water resources in the watershed.
Project Action Plan—'I'he project action plan contains four elements (described below) and
will be used to guide the project and provide a framework for project partners to manage and
protect groundwater resources using the model developed from the five-year project and assist
water resource managers and water purveyors with regional water management planning and
decision-making.
Action Plan Elements—
a. How will the model be used in the future and how it will benefit purveyors in the area.
The model will be available for use by state, county, and local governments. public water
purveyors, and local stake holder groups to evaluate potential anthropogenic and climatic
impacts on water resources in the watershed. Public water purveyors may benefit by using the
model to identify groundwater recharge areas and more accurately delineate well head protection
areas. The model will provide purveyors with a means to evaluate potential water quality impacts
associated with current land use and future changes in land use associated with growth plans.
The model also is a "predictive tool' designed to assist in decision making and help answer
questions about the effects on future groundwater levels and stream flows of projected increases
in groundwater withdrawals, changes in precipitation. and alterations in land use. Public water
purveyors may benefit by using the model to evaluate mitigation alternatives associated with
potential adverse impacts from current well production and future increases in well withdrawals.
b. How will the model be made available to purveyors, county administrators, and other
organizations that might benefit from it.
The model code (MODFLOW) and input files will be permanently archived with appropriate
documentation by the USGS and will be available upon request to purveyors, county
administrators, and all other entities. USGS publications describing the groundwater flow system
and model with input files will be available from the project website. Several public meetings
will be held during the course of the five-year project to present project results and provide stake
holders with information about the model and guidelines for its use.
The first public meeting is scheduled for March 2012 and will present information describing
preliminary results from the groundwater and surface water monitoring networks, a status report
on the development of the hydrogeologic framework; and a discussion of the project Action Plan
and our strategy for implementation of long-term modelstewardship. Subsequent public
meetings will be scheduled to coincide with the completion of major project tasks. November
12
2012 (completed hydrogeologic framework, water use, and groundwater recharge); July 2013
(completed Data Series report, begin numerical modeling): June 2014 (completed Conceptual
Model Report and steady-state model, begin transient model; March 2015 (completed transient
model and simulations); September 2015 (completed numerical model report and final results,
model and data archive and website, implementation of long-term model stewardship). As part of
our outreach strategy periodic project updates also will be provided at Regional Water
Association (RWA) and other local meetings.
c. How will the purveyors in the area be involved in the project, including identifying
partners, actions, time frames, and funding sources for the project.
All purveyors in the project area have been contacted by USGS staff, provided project work
plans describing project objectives, methods, and work elements, and invited to attend monthly
project team meetings. USGS staff are working closely with purveyors in the area to identify
potential public supply wells to include in the monthly groundwater monitoring network,
compile available aquifer test results, and compile water withdrawal and conveyance loss data.
Purveyors will be consulted on a regular basis during the project (monthly project team
meetings, public meetings, RWA meetings, and via email) to ensure project relevance to water
resource issues in the watershed. Purveyors will be encouraged to attend scheduled public
meetings, and to visit the project website to obtain current project updates and results. Purveyors
also will be encouraged to participate on the Advisory Group to ensure the best possible science
is considered during water resource decision-making. Several purveyors in the area are providing
funding for the project.
d. How will the model be maintained over time, and by whom.
The model code and input files will be permanently archived with appropriate documentation by
the USGS Washington Water Science Center Long-term model stewardship will be
accomplished through the formation of an Advisory Group to provide a resource for future
model users as well as a repository for model data coverages and results. The model is dynamic
and capable of evolving as new information becomes available for model improvement. The
Advisory Group also may facilitate the collection, archive, and integration of newly collected
data into the evolving model. It is anticipated that the Advisory Group will meet at least semi-
annually after the model is completed to address issues relating to new data and ongoing model
use and results.
Advisory Group membership will reflect local technical expertise and water resource
perspectives. Members of the project team will likely serve as initial members of the Advisory
Group and participate in initial stewardship activities. Members of the project team currently
include Pierce Conservation District, Washington State Department of Health, Cascade Water
Alliance, Tacoma Water L,akehaven Utility District. Robinson-Noble Inc., and the cities of
Sumner and Puyallup. Project team membership reflects a diverse range of interests including:
water resource sustainability; protection of riparian habitat and endangered species; well head
protection: and environmental evaluations of'growth management plans. Discussions regarding
future project team membership are ongoing and include the cities of Orting, Auburn, Kent,
Bonney Lake. Fife, and Enumclaw Although Tribal participation on the project team is unlikely
at this time, the objectives of the study have been discussed with representatives of the Puyallup
and Muckleshoot tribes.
13
A plan for the implementation of long-term model stewardship will be developed by the project
team during monthly meetings beginning in the fall of 2011 Meetings are scheduled for the
second Tuesday of every month and agenda items will include discussions of. 1) membership in
the Advisory Group; 2) the role (responsibilities) of the Advisory Group; 3) the design of the
model archive including data coverages and results; 4) how to ensure all stake holders are aware
of the model archive and its potential use; and 5) the technical expertise required to use the
model. A draft plan for the implementation of long-term model stewardship will be prepared by
March 30, 2012 and submitted to Washington State Department of Health for comment.
Future Model Use
Previous USGS modeling projects have identified technical expertise as a limiting factor in the
successful use of its models by stake holders. The Advisory Group should consider this issue
when formulating the plan for long-term model stewardship. The plan may need to acknowledge
that competent use of the model (especially if model modification are involved) may be beyond
the technical capabilities of most stake holders. and that "outside" technical expertise may be
required in some instances. Purveyors typically tum to environmental consulting firms to provide
the technical expertise for a variety of services including conducting aquifer tests and running
local scale numerical flow models. Our project team includes local consultants to insure
familiarity with our models for future use on behalf of purveyors. An important role of our
Advisory Group will be to serve as a repository of technical expertise to assist purveyors and
other stake holders with model use in the future.
Deliverables
The USGS will prepare and publish three scientific reports; 1) Data Series Report containing
monthly groundwater -level and synoptic stream baseflow measurements, and associated
information about the data collection sites. This report will be published by September 30, 2013,
2) Conceptual Model Report describing hydrogeologic framework, groundwater movement, and
water budget. This report will be published by December 31, 2014, and 3) Numerical Model
Report describing model construction, calibration, and selected simulations. This report will be
published and the model, including input files, will be transferred to the project partners by
September 30, 2015
The USGS will provide annual project updates to all project partners describing project progress
and any issues relating to the completion of specific project tasks. A project website will be
established and maintained for the duration of the study
14
/& yts3
6000002956/12WNWA20097- Amend.l
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
AMENDMENT OF JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT
FOR
WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
This amendment is for the agreement dated August 31, 2012
Paragraphs 2a and 2b of the agreement are hereby modified to read as follows:
(a) $65,000 by the party of the first part during the period
August 31, 2012 to September 30.2014
(b) $45,000 by the party of the second part during the period
August 31, 2012 to September 30,2014
The Joint Funding Agreement (JFA) between the USGS and the City of Auburn, Public Works
for a "fixed-price agreement to characterize the groundwater flow system in the Puyallup River
Watershed, King and Pierce Counties, Washington" is hereby amended to increase the
contribution of the USGS by $20,000.
These additional funds will allow the USGS to more fully characterize areas adjacent to the
northern part of the watershed that may He outside the water resource management jurisdictions,
of our project partners, but that are part of the groundwater flow system. A more detailed
explantion for the use of these funds is provided in the accompany program letter which is
considered apart of this agreement.
Total fimding is now at $110,000. Of this; amount the USGS contribution is increased from
$45,000 to $65,000; the contribution of the City of Auburn, Public Works is unchanged and
remains at $45,000.
All remaining terms and conditions as reflected in the original JFA are
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
( gnature)
Cynthia Barton, Ph.D.,L.G., LHG
(Name)
Center Director
(Title)
CITY OF AUBURN
PUBLIC WORKS
�.
Signature)
�ew,�s
(Name)
HA v,-f,-r—
(Title) ne.
(Title)
Date /a� /a Date DEC 112013
6000002956/ 12 WN WA20097/FY 12-15
Amendment 3
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
AMENDMENT OF JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT
FOR
WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
This amendment is for the agreement dated August 31, 2012
Paragraphs 2a and 2b of the agreement are hereby modified to read as follows:
(a) $65,000 by the party of the first part during the period
August 31, 2012 to April 30, 2015
(b) $45,000 by the party of the second part during the period
August 31, 2012 to April 30, 2015
The Joint Funding Agreement (JFA) between the USGS and the City of Auburn for a "fixed-
price agreement to characterize the groundwater flow system in the Puyallup River Watershed,
King and Pierce Counties, Washington" is hereby amended for a third time to extend the end
date of the agreement from January 31, 2015 to April 30, 2015.
This no -cost extension will provide additional time for the USGS to complete the conceptual
model report, and the review and publication process.
Total funding for this work is unchanged and remains at $110,000 with the USGS contributing
$65,000 and City of Auburn contributing $45,000.
All remaining terms and conditions as reflected in the original JFA and in Amendment No. 2 are
unchanged.
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
(Signature)
Cynthia Barton, Ph.D.,L.G., LHG
(Name)
Center Director
(Title)
Date /1?1 -/ �, -- /
CITY OF AUBURN
nature)
VU 14 MIA-1KIA -15 -fl
(Name)
M(Xybr
(Title)
Date 0— iq-4