HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-26-2012 Agenda Packet
Planning and Community Development
November 26, 2012 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - November 13, 2012* (Snyder)
III.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Ordinance No. 6421* (Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Ordinance No. 6339, the 2011-2012 Biennial Budget Ordinance as amended by
Ordinance No. 6351, Ordinance No. 6352, Ordinance No. 6362, Ordinance No.
6370, Ordinance No. 6378, Ordinance No. 6379, Ordinance No. 6400, and
Ordinance No. 6410, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2011-2012
Budget as set forth in schedule "A" and schedule "B".
B. Financial Options Available to the City of Auburn* (Coleman)
The Finance Department will present additional revenue options for Council
discussion and consideration.
C. COA Code Update Project, Phase 2 Group 2 - Amendments to Auburn City
Code (Hearing Examiner Chapter)* (Wagner)
Discuss proposed amendments to the Auburn City Code concerning the relocation
of and amendments to the Hearing Examiner Chapter.
D. 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments* (Dixon)
Overview of the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments with emphasis on
CPA12-0003 regarding proposed CPM #3 - Map Amendment to Map No. 14.1.
Additional materials, if applicable, will be provided on Wednesday, November
21, 2012 after the Planning Commission conducts its November 20, 2012
public hearing on this amendment request.
E. Director's Report (Snyder)
F. PCDC Matrix* (Snyder)
G. Presentation - Art's Commission Annual Report (Brewer/McKnight)
Auburn Arts Commission to provide an annual update on program and policy
development, event/program support, and planning.
Page 1 of 78
IV.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes - November 13, 2012
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
November 13, 2012 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only, see attached minutes.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 78
Planning and Community
Development
November 13, 2012 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Nancy Backus called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in Annex
Conference Room 2 located on the second floor of the One Main
Professional Plaza, One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chair Nancy Backus, Vice-Chair Partridge, and Member John Holman
were present. Also present were Mayor Pete Lewis; Planning and
Development Director Kevin Snyder, Planning Manager Elizabeth
Chamberlain, Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Principal Planner Jeff
Dixon, and Planning Secretary Tina Kriss.
Members of the audience present were: Scott Pondeleck, John
Pinsker, and Bob Kenworthy, Capital Projects Coordinator, Auburn
School District.
B. Announcements
1. Presentation (Snyder)
Planning Director Kevin Snyder introduced the City's contracted
Hearing Examiner Phil Olbrechts, Olbrechts and Associates,
PLCC, to update the Committee on activities and observations
during 2012.
Hearing Examiner Phil Olbrechts stated the Hearing Examiner
only issued eight decisions in the past twelve months. The eight
decisions were composed of rezones, three special exceptions,
one conditional use permit, and one preliminary plat. All
applications were approved or recommended for approval. There
was no significant opposition to any development proposal and
the public rarely came to testify for or against a project.
Committee, staff, and Mr. Olbrechts discussed the Auburn City
Code rezone standards and special exceptions related
to nonconforming uses.
The Committee thanked Mr. Olbrechts for his work as the City’s
contracted Hearing Examiner.
Page 1 of 4
CA.A Page 4 of 78
C. Agenda Modifications
The November 13, 2012 Planning & Community Development
Committee agenda, published on Friday, November 09, 2012, is
modified as follows:
The agenda modification removes from III. DISCUSSION:
A. Financial Options Available to the City of Auburn
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - October 22, 2012 (Snyder)
Member Holman moved and Vice-Chair Partridge seconded to
approve the October 22, 2012 minutes as written.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Financial Options Available to the City of Auburn (Coleman)
This item was removed from the Agenda
B. Resolution No. 4874 (Mund)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Setting a public hearing to consider the vacation of 2nd Street NE
between 1st Street NE and 3rd Street NE and the alley between 2nd
Street NE and 3rd Street NE, East of E Street NE, within the City of
Auburn, Washington
Engineering Technician Amber Mund presented the staff report.
Auburn School District No. 408 has applied to the City for vacation of
the right-of-way of 2nd Street NE between 1st Street NE and 3rd
Street NE, east of E Street NE and the right-of-way of the alley
between 2nd Street NE and 3rd Street NE, east of E Street NE, shown
on Exhibit "B". The applicant currently owns all of the surrounding
parcels and is proposing to use the right-of-way to provide access to
onsite facilities as well as accommodate future expansion of existing
facilities.
The application has been reviewed by City staff and utility purveyors
who have an interest in this right-of-way. Through this review City Staff
has determined that the right-of-way is no longer needed to meet the
needs of the City and that a public hearing should be set to determine
if said right-of-way may be vacated. Resolution No. 4874, if adopted
by City Council, sets the date of the public hearing for December 17,
Page 2 of 4
CA.A Page 5 of 78
2012 .
Committee was supportive of Resolution No. 4874.
C. 2012 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Snyder)
Principal Planner Jeff Dixon presented the staff report. The Planning
Commission held a public hearing on the first group of comprehensive
plan amendments on October 16, 2012. These amendments consist
of those proposed to the comprehensive plan map (CPM) and those
affecting plan policies and text (P/T). Committee and staff reviewed
the following amendments:
* Policy/Text Amendments: CPA12-0001 - P/T #1 - P/T #6
* Map Amendments - CPM #1
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the second group
of comprehensive plan amendments on November 7, 2012. These
amendments consist of those proposed to the Comprehensive Plan
Map (CPM) and those affecting the policies and text (P/T) as follows:
* Policy/Text Amendments - P/T #7
* Map Amendments - CPM #2 (File No. CPA12-0002); CPM #4
(File No. CPA12-0004); and CPM #5 Add new map No. 14.3,
"Economic Development Strategy Areas"
On November 20, 2012 the Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing on Map Amendment CPM #3 (File No. CPA12-0003),
Map Amendment to Map No. 14.1 - Locke Property to change the
Comprehensive Plan designation from "Single Family Residential"
to "High Density Residential.
Committee and staff reviewed the summary table outlining staff's
recommendation and Planning Commission's recommendation for
each amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of all items considered so far.
Committee was supportive of the recommendations proposed by the
Planning Commission and staff.
D. Director's Report (Snyder)
There was no director's report.
Mayor Lewis provided the Committee with an update on the proposed
King County new south county recycling and transfer station.
E. PCDC Matrix (Snyder)
Page 3 of 4
CA.A Page 6 of 78
Committee and staff reviewed the matrix. Committee recommended
no changes or additions.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning and
Community Development Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:40
p.m.
DATED THIS ________ day of ________________, 2012.
___________________________
Nancy Backus - Chair
___________________________
Tina Kriss - Planning Secretary
Page 4 of 4
CA.A Page 7 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6421
Date:
November 16, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Memo
ORD 6421
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Budget Impact:
$2,838,885
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6421
Background Summary:
Ordinance No. 6421 (Budget Amendment #9) amends the 2012 Adopted Budget (of the
2011-2012 biennium) as presented in the attached transmittal memorandum and
supporting attachments.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 8 of 78
Interoffice Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director
CC: Pete Lewis, Mayor
Date: November 14, 2012
Re: Ordinance #6421 – 2011-2012 Budget Amendment #9
This amendment is the fourth budget amendment for 2012 and the ninth budget amendment for the 2011-
2012 biennium. Proposed amendments to the 2012 budget are as follows:
Transportation project funds
This item budgets funding received for the M Street project and Auburn Way South sidewalk improvements.
The City received a Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board grant ($377,500) and a loan from the
Washington State Public Works Trust Fund ($1.0 million) for the M Street Project and also received a grant
from the Washington State Department of Transportation, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety program ($35,500)
for sidewalk improvements on Auburn Way South.
Water Utility project funds
This item adjusts the project budgets for several projects in the water utility consistent with the rate study as
approved by Council. These projects include water utility projects associated with street utility improvements;
water repair and replacements; water meter and billing improvements; and well 4 power and chlorination
improvements.
Flood control barrier removal
This item reflects $1.2 million in funding received by the King County Flood Control District to finance the
removal of flood control barriers along the Green River. Funding is administered within the Stormwater Utility.
Removal of the barriers is underway and nearly complete. The project is expected to be fully completed by
the end of 2012. This project is fully funded by proceeds from the District.
Household hazardous waste fees
This item reflects $30,000 in additional revenues collected as a result of a fee increase by King County and
additional solid waste customers. The HHW fee is a King County fee that is included in monthly billings for
solid waste services. Revenue collected is remitted quarterly to King County for operation of their HHW
program, including the Hazardous Waste Mobile.
Facility repairs and maintenance
This item budgets $45,000 for additional and unanticipated repairs at various city facilities. This
includes paint, siding repairs, and asbestos removal at the AVHS facility, repairs and carpet
replacement at the caretaker facility at Mary Olson Farm, and miscellaneous repairs such as
replacement of windows due to vandalism at the Senior Center.
DI.A Page 9 of 78
FEMA Reimbursement
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has completed processing the City’s claims for costs
related to the January 2012 winter storm. Funding to reimburse City costs is recognized in the amount
of $309,270 and is included in several departments of the City, including the General Fund (Park s,
Public Works/Emergency Management, Streets, Police and Planning/Human Services), Utilities
(Water, Sewer, Stormwater), Cemetery Fund, Facilities Fund and Innovation and Technology Fund.
Utility bond projects
In 2010, the City issued utility bonds for the construction of major utility system improvements in the
Water, Sewer and Stormwater utilities1. Per staff discussion with City Bond Counsel, bond funding
may be reallocated between projects as long as the projects are within the same utility. This item will
reallocate $464,000 from the White River Pump Station project (savings due to lower than anticipated
construction costs) to the Well 1 Storm Improvements project. Both projects are within the stormwater
utility.
Redflex expenditure changes (technical correction)
This is a technical correction and reduces expenses related to the reduction of Redflex revenues that
was authorized in budget amendment #8 (Ordinance #6410). The original amendment reduced ending
fund balance when it should be been to budgeted expenses related to the administration of the Redflex
program.
The following table summarizes the current and revised budget as a result of this amendment.
Table 1: 2012 Budget as Amended
2012 Approved Budget $ 261,117,063
Budget Amendment #9 (Ord #6421) 2,838,885
Budget as Amended $ 263,955,948
Attachments:
1. Proposed Ordinance #6421 (budget adjustment #9)
2. Summary of proposed 2012 budget adjustments by fund and department (Schedule A)
3. Summary of approved changes to adopted 2012 budget by fund (Schedule B)
1 Ord. 6335.
DI.A Page 10 of 78
-------------------------
Ordinance No. 6421
November 19, 2012
Page 1 of 4
ORDINANCE NO. 6421
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
6339, THE 2011-2012 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE AS
AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6351, ORDINANCE NO.
6352, ORDINANCE NO. 6362, ORDINANCE NO. 6370,
ORDINANCE NO. 6378, ORDINANCE NO. 6379,
ORDINANCE NO. 6400, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6410,
AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF AUBURN
2011-2012 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE “A” AND
SCHEDULE “B”
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 6,
2010, adopted Ordinance No. 6339 which adopted the City of Auburn 2011-2012
Biennial budget; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of February 22,
2011, adopted Ordinance No. 6351 (BA#1) which amended Ordinance No. 6339
which adopted the City of Auburn 2011-2012 Biennial budget; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of April 4, 2011,
adopted Ordinance No. 6352 (BA#2) which amended Ordinance No. 6351; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of July 18, 2011,
adopted Ordinance No. 6362 (BA#3) which amended Ordinance No. 6352; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of September 6,
2011 adopted Ordinance No. 6370 (BA#4) which amended Ordinance 6362; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 5,
2011 adopted Ordinance No. 6378 (BA#5) which amended Ordinance 6370; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 5,
2011 adopted Ordinance No. 6379 (BA#6) which amended Ordinance 6378; and
DI.A Page 11 of 78
-------------------------
Ordinance No. 6421
November 19, 2012
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of March 19,
2012 adopted Ordinance No. 6400 (BA#7) which amended Ordinance 6379; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of June 18, 2012
adopted Ordinance No. 6410 (BA#8) which amended Ordinance 6400; and
WHEREAS, in 2010 the Auburn City Council authorized the issuance of
$21.3 million in utility revenue bonds to fund major utility system improvements; and
WHEREAS, storm drainage improvements to the White River Pump Station,
one of the projects funded by the 2010 utility revenue bonds, were under budget by
$464,000 due to lower than anticipated construction cost estimates; and
WHEREAS, upsizing storm drainage lines in Well 1 in the Storm Drainage
Utility, which was not included in the original 2010 utility revenue bond issuance, is
a major utility system that supports the continued management of utility services;
and
WHEREAS, the project cost savings of $464,000 is reallocated from the
White River Pump Station to Well 1 for storm drainage improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional
funds to the various funds of the 2012 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA#9);
and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the
majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200.
DI.A Page 12 of 78
-------------------------
Ordinance No. 6421
November 19, 2012
Page 3 of 4
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment of the 2011-2012 Biennial Budget. The 2011-
2012 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34
RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule “A” attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn,
Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts
shown on said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B”. A copy of said Schedule “A” and
Schedule “B” is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection.
Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the
remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other
person or circumstance shall not be affected.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directives of this legislation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided
by law.
DI.A Page 13 of 78
-------------------------
Ordinance No. 6421
November 19, 2012
Page 4 of 4
INTRODUCED: _______________
PASSED: ____________________
APPROVED: _________________
____________________________
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Danielle E. Daskam
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Daniel B. Heid
City Attorney
PUBLISHED:__________________
DI.A Page 14 of 78
DI.A Page 15 of 78
DI.A Page 16 of 78
DI.A Page 17 of 78
DI.A Page 18 of 78
DI.A Page 19 of 78
DI.A Page 20 of 78
DI.A Page 21 of 78
DI.A Page 22 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Financial Options Available to the City of Auburn
Date:
November 16, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Options
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Discuss additional revenue options for Committee discussion and consideration.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services, Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 23 of 78
SUMMARY OF REMAINING SOURCES OF CITY REVENUES DRAFT FORLDISCUSSIONONLY
Est'd Capacity
Revenue Source/Description Coundlmanic. Voter Approval Req'd
Remaining debt capacity
With a Vote
Without a General For For Parks and
Vote Purposes Utilities Open Space Total
Item 1.50% 1.00% 2.50% 2.50%Capacity 33'2M 413M
Legal Limit 103,807,901 69,205,268 173,013,169 173,013,169 519,039,507 remaining council- remaining
Outstanding indebtedness (70,586,606) 70,586,606)
manic debt capacity. debt capacity
Margin available 33,221,295 69,205,268 173,013,169 173,013,169 448,452,901
Public Utility Tax-additional 1.0%utility tax
City currently assesses a 7.0%public utility(water,sewer,storm,garbage)tax(6.0%to General
Fund;1.0%to Arterial street Preservation).No limit on tax rate.Each additional 1.0%generates
approximately$500K/yr.
Water(1.0%=$120K/yr) 500,000/yr(1.0%) N/A
Sewer(1.0%_$210K/yr)
Storm(1.0%=$90K)
Garbage(1.0%=$80K)
Cable TV Utility Tax-additional 1.0%utility tax
City currently assesses a 1.0%utility tax on cable TV services,with proceeds going towards 170,000/yr(1.0%)-
Arterial Street Preservation.Limit is 6:0%.Each 1.0%generates approximately$170K/yr 850,000/yr(5.0%)
N/A
General B&O Taxes-.20%tax rate
City is authorized to levy a'business and occupation tax of up to.2%on the gross income or gross
receipts. Businesses eligible for the B&O tax include:Extracting;Manufacturing;Retailing/Retail
sale;Services;and Wholesale.rEach.01%is estimated to generater$235K(e.g..10%=$2.35M;
20%=$4.70M).Estimated revenues may be conservative and is based'upon available business
4.700.000/yr(.2096) N/A
data from Department of Revenue. Further analysis will be required to refine estimated
revenue.
1DI.B Page 24 of 78
SUMMARY OF REMAINING SOURCES OF CITY REVENUES DRAFT FOR
DISCUSSION ONLY
Est'd Capacity
Revenue Source/'Description Councilmanic Voter Approval Req'd
Regulatory License Fees
A regulatory license fee can fall into two categories:1)business license fees which serve to
register all businesses and firovide a record of the owners(this is the current$50 business
license fee for Auburn);2)-a revenue generating regulatory license fee,which can include
additional criteria as part of the basis for calculating the business license fee.This basis can
TBD,based upon the fee
N/A
include,for example,•number of employees,square footage,or the type of business.State'law and methodlogy
allows for a good deal of creativity in designing these fees;however classes of businesses must
be clearly defined with each business with each class being charged the same fee. This
methodology is easiest to administer relative to the General B&O tax.
Metropolitan Parks District(MPD)-$.75/$1,000 property tax levy
A MPD can be,formed for the management,improvement,maintenance,and acquisition of parks
and recreational facilities: An MPD camlevy up to$.75/$1000 of assessed valuation with voter 5,100,000/yr($.75/$1000 In excess of$.7S/$1000 of
approval and:can exceed levy limit by a supermajority vote,with 40%of last turnout required. of assessed value) assessed value
Estimated'revenue basedwpon annual citywide AV of$6:8B.
Transportation Benefit District(TBD)-$20 annual car tab fee
City created a TBD in 2011(Ordinance 6377)4or the financing of transportation improvements.
A TBD candevy up to a$20 annual car tab license fee without voter approval and can levy a car 700,000/yr($20 annual
21-$100 annual fee
tab fee of up to$100 annually with voter approval.Estimated revenue of$700K/yr,based upon fee)
20 car tab fee. Additional tab fees of$80 may collected with voter approval.
October 22,2012
Prepared by Aubum Finance Department
FAFlnandal Planning Manager\Revenues\[Remaining Taxing Capad &60 Calcs.xlsxi
2DI.B Page 25 of 78
DRAFT FOR
Proposed B&O Taxes L SCUSSION ONLY
Manufacturing Retail Services Wholesale Total
DOR Grass Business Income'(GBQ 1,006,231,433 909,360,496 $1,091 $1,940,499,142: $4,952,645,998
DOR Reported number of taxpayers 179 501 1,565 183 2,428
Less: Apportionment
Apportionment assumption(%of GBI) 40.0%40.0%40.0%40.0% '
Net After Apportionment 603,738;860 S4S,616,298 657,932,956 1,164,299,485 2,971,587,599
Less:Exemption-$250,000 threshold
Exemption assumption(%of GBI after
apportionment)20% 20% 20% 2096
Net After Exemption 482,991;088 436,493,038 526,346,365 931,439,588 2,377,270,079
Less:R&D Exemption
Taxable Amount 482,991;088 436;493,038 526,346,365 931,439,588 $2,377;270;079
Scenario 1: B&O Tax Rate@ Kent's adopted
B&O Tax Rate_ _ _ _ 0.00046 0.00046 0.00152 0.00152
calculatedYield=@,KeM'radopted'rate_ _222,176 _ _$200;787- -__ _ $800,046 2;638;797]
Scenario 2: B&OTax Rate @ maximum
B&O Tax Rate_ 0.00200 0.00200_ 0.00200 0.00200
r falalated yieW!=@.2Q%inaxiteum,rate 965,982` --_$872,986 ' ,$1052;693,
T _ $
1,862,879- ''$¢;754;5401
Note: Estimated revenues may be conservative and is based upon available business data from Department of Revenue. Further analysis will be required to refine estimated
revenue.Note also that Extracting is not included in the data above;this sector contains 3 taxpayers with a Gross Business Income of$6.3 million(or.13%of the total$4.9B
681 shown). Ata.2%B&O tax rate,the potential yield from the Extracting sector would generate approximately$12,600.
October 22,2012
Prepared by Auburn Finance Department
F:\Financial Planning Manager\Revenues\[Remaining Taxing Capacities&80 Cali axlsx)
3DI.B Page 26 of 78
d
Local Business (B&O)Tax Rates
Effective January 1, 2012
Manufacturing Services Wholesale
city County Phone 9 Rate Retell Rate Rate Rate
Aberdeen Grays Harbor (360)633.4100 0.002 0.003a 0.00375 a 0.0038
Algona King 253)833.2897 0.00046 0.00046 0.00046 0.00045
Bainbridge Island Kiteep 208)842-7033 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Bellows King 425)452.8851 0.001490 0.001496 0.001496 0.001496
Bellingham Whatoom MM 6788900 0.0017 0.0017 0.0044 a 0.0017
Bremerton Ki(sap 380)4785290 0.0016 0.00125 0.002 0.0016
Burien King 206)241.4647 0.0005 6.0008 0.0065 0:0005
Cosmopolls Grays Harbor (360)532-9230 0.001487 0.001487 0.001487 0.001487
Danington Snohomish (360)438.1131 0.00075 0.00076 0.00075 0.00075
Des Moines Kin 878-0595 0.002 1 0.002 - 0.002. 1 0.002
DuPont Pierce 263)9845121- - 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Everett Snohomish (425)257.8601 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Everson Wheteom (386)8663411 0.002 0.002
Granite Falls Snohomish (360)881.8441 0.002 0.002
Ho ulam Grays Harbor 60 6325700 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002.
Ilwaco Pacific 360)886.3145 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Issaquah King 425)8373054 0.01108 0.0668 0.601 0.0008
Kelso Cowlitz 360)423-0900 0.001 0.001 0.062 0.001
Lacey Thurston (360)4913214 0.001 0.002
Lake Forest Park IKIna 208)368.5440 1 0.002 0.002 0.002 1 0.002
Long Beach Pacific 380)642.4421 0.002 0.002 0.002- 0.002-
Longview Cowlitz 380)442-5000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001
Mercer Island King 206)2365300 0.001 0.601 6.001 0.001
North Send King 425)8881211 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Ooean Shores Grays Harbor (3601289-2488 0.002 - 0.002 0.002 0.002
Olymple Thurston (360)753.6327 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001
Pacific King 53)633.2858 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.062
Port Townsend Jefferson (360)3053000 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Rainier Thurston (360)4482285 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Raymond 1pacific; 380 9423451 1 0.002 0.002 0.002 -1 0.002
Roy- Pierce 253)843-1113 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001
Ruston Pierce 253)759.3544 0.0011 0.00153 11.002 0.00102
Seattle King 206)884.8300 0.002154 0.00215 v 0.00416 v 0.00215 v
Shelton Mason 360)428.4491 0.601 0.001 0.001 01001
Sno uaimte Kln 425 11881555 0.0016 0.0015 0.0015 0.6016
Tacoma Pierce 253)5915262 0.0011 0.00153 0.004 a 0.00102
Tumwater Thurston (360)764-6805 0.001 0.601 0.002 0.001
Westport Grays Harbor (380)288-0131 0.0025 a 0.0056 0.005 a 0.6025 e
Yeim Thurston 60 4583244 0.001 1 0.002 1 0.002 1 0.001
Average 0.00148 0.00160 0.00199 0.00160
v)=voter approved Increase above statutory limit
e)=rate higher than statutory limit because rate was effective prior to January 1,1982(i.e.,grandfathemd).
Mercer Island's B&O tax rate is still.001 with a gross receipts annual exemption amount of$150,000(i.e.only
gross receipts in excess of$150,000 are subject to the.001 tax rate).
NOTE:Tax rates may apply to businesses categories other than those above.Exemptions,deductions,or other
exceptions may apply in certain circumstances.Contact the city finance department for more Information.
NOTE:Black Diamond repealed Its B&O lax effective January 1,2008.Buckley repealed Its B&O tax effective
January 1,2007
Association of Washington Clges 3/20/2012
DI.B Page 27 of 78
DI.B Page 28 of 78
DI.B Page 29 of 78
What is the difference between a business license and a regulato... Page 1 of 2
R*S6 Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington
Working Together for Excellence in Local Government
a
Featured Inquiry (05/23/11)
Reviewed: 05/11
To search or browse past MRSC inquiries, please
visit the MRSC Inquiries page, which contains a Need
a er
listing of the most recent Featured Inquiries and
older Inquiries categorized by subject. ask a mirlSc
Municipal Research and Services Center
Question:
What is the difference between a business license and a regulatory license?
Answer:
Local government business license programs range in purpose from basic
business registration programs to more comprehensive regulatory license
programs.
The purpose of a basic business license/registration program is provide the
city with a record of the types of businesses operating in the city, their
location and the names and addresses of their owners in the event a citizen
or a city department has a problem with a business. Another purpose would
be to help ensure compliance with city ordinances (e.g , zoning
requirements). Cities that levy a gross receipts business and occupation tax
also need to register businesses to be able to check for their compliance in
the payment of taxes. Fees for these types of business licenses are typically
set at a flat rate per license in an amount designed to recover the
administrative costs of registering the businesses and issuing the licenses,
maintaining the files, etc.
At the other end of the business license program spectrum are the more
comprehensive occupational licensing programs that are more regulatory in
nature. These programs are aimed at such businesses as pawnbrokers,
second hand stores, taxis and taxi drivers, massage parlors, and the like.
These businesses are often subject to a more rigorous set of regulations
that apply specifically to them, relate to the conduct of their business,
and/or may require investigations and background checks prior to issuance
http://WwW.r.hrse.org/askrhiso,/featuredinq.aspx?inq=l 151 11/5/2012DI.B Page 30 of 78
What is the difference between a business license and a regulato... Page 2 of 2
of the license. The license requirement facilitates the city's monitoring and
enforcement of these regulations. The license fee may include, in addition
to the costs listed above, the costs of investigating the background of the
person reouestina the license. The license fees for professional and
Implementing a business license program is considered to be a sound
management practice to protect the corporate city and its citizens. The
basic authority for a noncharter code city to license, regulate, and make
inspections of businesses and occupations is found in ACW 35A.82.020.
There are similar statutes for other classes of cities.
http://www.mrsc.org/askmrsc/featuredinq.aspx?inq=1151 11/5/2012
DI.B Page 31 of 78
Utility Tax Rates on Inside city utilities
Source:2012 AWC Tax and User Fee Survey
City C ounty POPUIiition Water Sewer: stormwate, Garbage
Aberdeen Grays Harbor 16,450 7% 7%M
Albion Whitman 620 5% 5% 5%
Algona King 2,775 6% 6%6%6%
Almira Lincoln 285 25%25% 25%
Anacortes Skagit 16,800 7% 7%7% 7%
Arlington Snohomish 17,280 5% 5%5% 5%
Asotin Asotin 1,235 6% 6%
Auburn King 68,270 7% 7%7% 7%
Bellevue King 122,900 10.40% S%5% 4.50%
Bingen Klickitat 690 6% 6% 6%
Blaine Whatcom 4,790 9% 9%9%6%
Bothell King 33,430 5% 5% 5%
Bremerton Kitsa , 36,190 15.50% 20% 20% 9.50%
Bridgeport Douglas 2,100 5% 5% 8.60%.
Brier Snohomish 6,490 6%
Buckley Pierce 4,625 9% 9%9%9%
Bucoda Thurston 660 10% 10%
Burien King 31,730 6%
Carnation King 1,915 6%8%
Cashmere Chelan 3,005 6% 6% 6%
Cathlamet Wahkiakum 580 6% 6% 6%
Centralia Lewis 15,570 1D%14% 10%
Chehalis Lewis 7,185 6% 6%
Chelan Chelan 4,105 9.50% 9.50% 9.50%
Chewelah Stevens 2,450 15%15%
Clarkston Asotin 7,265 14% 6%
Colville Stevens 5,045 6% 6% 6%
Concrete Skagit 710 6% 6%
Connell Franklin 4,220 9%6% 6%
Cosmopolis Grays Harbor 1,645 6%6%
Coupeville Island 1,890 6%6% 6%
Covington King 17,640 5.50%
page 1 of 5DI.B Page 32 of 78
Utility Tax Rates ominside city utilities
Source:2012 AWC Tax and User Fee Survey
Dardngton Snohomish 1,505 8%8%
Davenport Lincoln 1,725 18%18% 18%
DuPont Pierce 7,930 11%6%8% 8%
Duvall King 5,990 6% 6% 6%
Edmonds Snohomish 40,900 6%10% 10%6%
Ellensburg Kittitas 17,326 10%10%
Elma Grays Harbor 3,120 1.50% 1.50%
Entiat Chelan 1,205 6% 6%
Enumclaw King 11,490 8% 8% 8%
Ephrata Grant 7,080 20% 20% 8%
Farmington Whitman 135 6% 6%
Fife Pierce 8,210 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
Fircrest Pierce 6,345 8% 6% 8.50%
Garfield Whitman 630 6% 6% 6%
George Grant 550 6% 6% 6%
Goklendale Klickitat 3,730 6% 6% 6%
Grandview Yakima 9,290 24.20% 6% 40%
Granger Yakima 3,100 36% 36% 36%
Harrah Yakima 630 12%12%
Hatton Adams 110 6%
Hoquiam Grays Harbor 8,770 lieu tax lieu tax% lieu tax% 8%
Ilwaco Pacific 1,115 6% 6%6% 6%
Kahlotus Franklin 225 5%5%
Kalama Cowlitz 2,510 6% 6%
Kelso Cowlitz 11,780 8% 8% 8%
Kennewick Benton 68,570 15.50% 7%1% 7%
Kent King 88,760 10%10% 30% 7.80%
Kirkland King 49,620 10.50% 13.38% 7.50% 10.50%
Kittitas Kittitas 1,182 12%12% 6%
Lacey Thurston 40,130 6% 6%6% 6%
LaCrosse Whitman 345 6%6%
Langley Island 1,115 6%6%6% 6%
page 2 of 5DI.B Page 33 of 78
Utility Tax Rates on Inside city utilities
Source:2012 AWCTax and User Fee Survey
Leavenworth Chelan 2,325 10%10% 10%
Longview Cowlitz 36,100 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50%
Lyman Skagit 445 6%
Lynden Whatcom 11,850 6% 6% 6%6%
Lynnwood Snohomish 36,160 4%4%4%6%
Mabton Yakima 2,165 20% 20% 20%
Mansfield Douglas 330 12%12%
Marysville Snohomish 58,040 6% 6% 6%
Mattawa Grant 3,405 10%10% 10%
Medina King 2,980 3% 3%3%
Milton Pierce 6,540 6% 6%6% 6%
Monroe Snohomish 16,680 10%
Mossyrock Lewis 695 6%
Moxee Yakima 2,695 6% 6% 6%
Mukilteo Snohomish 20,150 6%6%
Naches Yakima 770 6% 6% 6%
Napavine Lewis 1,715 5% 5% 3.60%
Oakesdale Whitman 420 6% 6% 6%
Oakville Grays Harbor 715 6%6%
Odessa Lincoln 960 24% 24%
Okanogan Okanogan 2,500 10%10%
Olympia Thurston 45,500 12% 10% 10% 10%
Omak Okanogan 4,780 30% 10% 10% 10%
Omville Okanogan 1,755 10%10% 10%
Orting Pierce 6,245 8.60%
Othello Adams 6,800 2%
Pacific King 6,305 6% 6%
Palouse Whitman 1,015 6%6% 7%
Pasco Franklin 56,300 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 8.50%
Patens Okanogan 635 6%6% 6%
Pomeroy Ga eld 1,525 6%6% 6%
Poulsbo Kitsap 8,920 8% 8%8%6%
page 3 of 5DI.B Page 34 of 78
Utility Tax Rates on-inside city utilities
Source:2012 AWC Tax and User Fee Survey
Prosser Benton 5,140 20.60% 22.10%
Pullman Whitman 27,920 8%8% 11%
Puyallup Pierce 38,900 8% 8%8% 2.20%
Quincy Grant 6,220 4%4% 4%
Rainier Thurston 1,805' 6%6%
Raymond Pacific 3,065 10%
Redmond King 53,680 9.23% 9.23% 6%
Renton King 86,230 7.50% 6%6%6%
Richland Benton 48,580 12.23% 10.50% 8.50% 10.50%
Ridgefield Clark 4,370 8% 8%
Ritzville Adams 1,745 10%10% 30%
Riverside Okanogan 330 6%6%
Roslyn Kittitas 1,015 6%6%
Roy Pierce 860 6%6%
Ruston i Pierce 765 6%6%6% 6%
Seattle King 612,000 15.54% 12% 11.50% 11.50%
Sequim Clallam 5,830 8% 8% 6%
Shelton Mason 8,975 11.63% 5%5%5%
Shoreline King 54,580 6%6%
Skykomish King 225 1.46%
Snoqualmie King 9,850 9%9%9%9%
Sprague Lincoln 495 20.03% 3.85% 3.60%
Springdale Stevens 280 6%6% 6%
Stanwood Snohomish 5,705 10.70% 6%6%6%
Steilacoom Pierce 6,300 6%6%6%6%
Stevenson Skamania 1,470 3%
Sultan Snohomish 4,570 6%6% 6%
Sumas Whatcom 1,319 9% 9%
Sumner Pierce 9,080 6% 5%6%6%
Sunnyside Yakima 15,410 6% 6% 6%
Tacoma Pierce 206,200 8% 8%8% 8%
WhTekoa itman 815 5.20% 6% 15%
page 4 of 5
DI.B Page 35 of 78
Utility Tax Rates on!Inside city utilities
Source:2012 AWC Tax and User Fee Survey
Tieton Yakima 1,195 6% 6% 4.60%
Toledo Lewis 695 5% 5%5% 5%
Toppenish. Yakima 9,080 23% 23% 23% 23%
Tukwila King 18,190 10%10% 10%
Tumwater Thurston 16,770 6%6%6% 6%
Twisp Okanogan 995 9%9% 9%
Vader Lewis 640 7%1 7%
Vancouver Clark 165,500 20% 20% 20% 20%
Wapato Yakima 4,605 33% 33% 33%
Waterville Douglas 1,185 6% 5% 3.60%
Wenatchee Chelan 31;120 16% 16% 16%16%
Westport Grays Harbor 2,345 6%6%
Wilbur Lincoln 890 Water/Sewer/Garba Water/Sewer/Garba Water/Sewer/Garba
Wilkeson Pierce 470 6% 6%6%
Wmlock Lewis 1,370 5% 5%5%
Winthrop Okanogan 440 15%15% 6%
Woodinville long 11;350 4%
Woodway Snohomish 1,200 6%
Yacolt Clark 1,500 2.75%
Yakima Yakima 85,040 20% 20%6%15%
Yelm i__T1hurston 5,900 4% 4%4% 6%
Zillah Yakima 2,790 32% 1 32% 32%
Average Tax Bate-WA 9.2% 9.0% 7.8% 8.7%
High, 36.0% 36.0% 23.0% 40.0%
Low 1.5% 1.5% 1.0% 2.2%
Fima si%anniMManager\aevenues\$Ute de Cility TvfttesA=IAWCFeport WAUtilftlrax
page 5 of 5
DI.B Page 36 of 78
FFFFssesFFFFFFSS - sFs3i5F
pFRF
FssFssFss - - [ F - s
8 8
F -
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 § k 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
a -
8
o 0 0 0 0
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 $ 8 8 8 $ $ $ $ 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8
T M
8 8 8 $ 8 8 $ 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 8 $ 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8
N
DI.B Page 37 of 78
Y e a r
$1 .5 M p
e r Y e a r
$6 .2 M p
e r Y e a r
$6 .7 M p
e r Y e a r
2 0 1 2 6 4 6 4 6 4
2 0 1 3 6 2 6 5 6 6
2 0 1 4 6 0 6 6 6 6
2 0 1 5 5 8 6 7 6 7
2 0 1 6 5 7 6 7 6 8
2 0 1 7 5 5 6 7 6 7
2 0 1 8 5 3 6 7 6 8
2 0 1 9 5 1 6 7 6 9
2 0 2 0 5 0 6 8 6 8
2 0 2 1 4 8 6 8 6 9
2 0 2 2 4 6 6 8 6 9
2 0 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 0
2 0 2 4 4 3 6 8 7 0
2 0 2 5 4 2 6 9 7 1
2 0 2 6 4 1 6 9 7 1
2 0 2 7 4 0 6 9 7 1
2 0 2 8 3 9 6 9 7 1
2 0 2 9 3 8 6 9 7 1
2 0 3 0 3 7 6 9 7 2
2 0 3 1 3 6 7 0 7 2
2 0 3 2 3 5 7 0 7 2
A v e r a g e S y s t e m P C I O v e r T i m e
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
8
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
4
2
0
2
6
2
0
2
8
2
0
3
0
2
0
3
2
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Sy
s
t
e
m
P
C
I
$
6 .7 M p e r
Y e a r
$
6 .2 M p e r
Y e a r
$1
.5 M p e r
Y e a r
DI.B Page 38 of 78
DI.B Page 39 of 78
DI.B Page 40 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
COA Code Update Project,
Phase 2 Group 2 -
Amendments to Auburn City
Code (Hearing Examiner
Chapter)
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and
Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning Commission
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Wagner
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C Page 41 of 78
Memorandum
To: Councilmember Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
Councilmember John Partridge, Vice Chair, Planning and Community Development
Committee
Councilmember John Holman, Planning and Community Development Committee
From: Stuart Wagner, AICP, Senior Planner
Planning and Development Department
CC: Kevin Snyder, AICP, Planning and Development Director
Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager
Date: November 16, 2012
Re: Code Update Project – Phase 2, Group 2
Discussion of proposed code amendments to Hearing Examiner Chapter and Planning
Commission recommendation.
Background
The Planning and Community Development Committee recently went over zoning code
amendments to Title 18 – Zoning of the Auburn City Code (Code Update Project - Phase 2,
Group 2). On October 22, 2012 the PCDC recommended approval of those amendments to full
City Council and on November 5, 2012 the City Council adopted them. Planning staff had
intended to bring changes to the Hearing Examiner Chapter (18.66 ACC) with the previous code
amendments, but they were not at a point to move forward. The remaining item for review are
the changes related to the Hearing Examiner Chapter (18.66 ACC).
On November 7, 2012 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the
amendments. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission concurred with staff
and made a recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the proposed code
amendments.
Discussion
The role of the Hearing Examiner, as codified in Auburn City Code (ACC), goes beyond land
use matters. The Hearing Examiner is also the appeal body on many contested administrative
decisions such as utility billing disputes, dangerous dog determinations, or building and code
violations but Chapter 18.66 ACC – Hearing Examiner is only written for the purposes of land
use matters. As such, the Hearing Examiner Chapter is better suited in Title 2 – Administrative
and Personnel where other positions, boards, committees, and commissions are listed.
DI.C Page 42 of 78
In addition to relocating the Hearing Examiner Chapter to Title 2, staff in consultation with the
legal department and current Hearing Examiner, amended the Chapter in several places. The
following is a summary of those changes:
• The Hearing Examiner as the appeal body to administrative decisions is referenced
throughout the code. In order to bring clarity and ease of use to the code, staff has
added a new “areas of jurisdiction” section that shows everything the Hearing Examiner
is responsible for.
• The current code has the planning department as the department that receives all
applications and appeals. It also lists the planning department in charge of writing
reports that summarize the issues involved. The code has been modified to read
“responsible parties” instead of the planning department because land use matters are
not the only cases the Hearing Examiner reviews.
• Most jurisdictions have a “burden of proof” section in their code. Staff has added this
section to the Hearing Examiner Chapter to indicate which party (applicant/appellant or
City) is responsible for proving their case.
• The current code only gives the Hearing Examiner 10 calendar days to provide a written
decision. The code has been modified to 10 working days, thereby giving the examiner
additional time to write his decision. This new timeline also matches state law (RCW
35.63.170)
• Chapter 18.66 ACC is referenced throughout the Auburn Municipal Code. All references
have been changed to Chapter 2.46 ACC.
Attached to this memorandum are the code amendments reviewed by the Planning
Commission. If the Committee is satisfied with these code amendments, staff will return with an
agenda bill and finalized ordinances for review prior to Council action.
Attachments
1. Auburn City Code Chapter 2.46 – Hearing Examiner (relocated and revised)
2. Planning Commission Agenda Bill - Staff Report
DI.C Page 43 of 78
DI.C Page 44 of 78
DI.C Page 45 of 78
DI.C Page 46 of 78
DI.C Page 47 of 78
DI.C Page 48 of 78
DI.C Page 49 of 78
DI.C Page 50 of 78
DI.C Page 51 of 78
DI.C Page 52 of 78
DI.C Page 53 of 78
DI.C Page 54 of 78
DI.C Page 55 of 78
DI.C Page 56 of 78
DI.C Page 57 of 78
DI.C Page 58 of 78
DI.C Page 59 of 78
DI.C Page 60 of 78
DI.C Page 61 of 78
DI.C Page 62 of 78
DI.C Page 63 of 78
DI.C Page 64 of 78
DI.C Page 65 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Summary Matrix 2012 Amendments
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development Other: Planning Commission, Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Dixon
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 66 of 78
Page 1 of 3
Memorandum
To: Councilmember Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development
Committee
Councilmember, John Partridge Vice- Chair, Planning and Community Development
Committee
Councilmember, John Holman, Member, Planning and Community Development
Committee
From: Jeff Dixon, Principal Planner
Planning and Development Department
Cc: Pete Lewis, Mayor
Kevin Snyder, AICP, Planning and Development Director
Date: November 19, 2012
Re: Discussion of 2012 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Planning Commission
Actions, Recommendations and specifically Commission’s November 20, 2012
meeting
DISCUSSION
The draft docket and draft schedule of the Annual amendments were previously discussed with
the PCD Committee on June 25, 2012. Also, a reporting of the status of Annual Comprehensive
Plan Amendments processing occurred at the September 10, 2012 and November 13, 2012
PCDC meetings. At the November 26, 2012 staff will review and discuss the proposed annual
Comprehensive Plan amendments, Planning Commission recommendations, and the one
remaining private map amendment from the November 20, 2012 hearing (Item CPM #3 (File #
CPA12-0003, below).
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
1. October 17, 21012 Planning Commission Hearing:
The public hearing on the first group of comprehensive plan amendments consisted of the
following:
Case Number CPA12-0001 (unless indicated):
A. Policy/Text Amendments
P/T #1 – Auburn School District 2012-2018 Capital Facilities Plan
P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2013-2018
P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2013 Capital Facilities Plan
DI.D Page 67 of 78
Page 2 of 3
P/T #4 – Kent School District 2012/2013 – 2017/2018 Capital Facilities Plan
P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2013-2018 Capital Facilities Plan
P/T #6 - Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Revise Chapter 2 – ‘The Street System’
Revise (eliminate and replace) Table 2-3 ‘Future Roadway
Capacity Improvement Projects and Cost Estimates’
Revise text pages 2-14 thru 2-15 to be consistent with updated
Table 2-3.
Revise Figure 2-6 ‘Roadway Improvements Alternatives’ to be
consistent with updated Table 2-3.
Revise Chapter 5 – ‘Policies’
Update policies: TR-19, TR-20 & TR-21 related to Level of Service,
TR-23 related to concurrency, TR-28 related to finance, TR-59
related to parking and TR-163 related to transit.
B. Map Amendments
CPM #1 – Comprehensive Plan – Revise Electrical Service Map No. 6.1
2. November 7, 2012 Planning Commission Hearing:
A public hearing on the second group of comprehensive plan amendments consisted of the
following:
A. Policy/Text Amendments
P/T #7 - Comprehensive Plan
Revise Chapter 14 – ‘Comprehensive Plan Map’ related to economic development
strategies areas
Revise pages 14-25 through 14-28 to incorporate advancement of
economic development strategy areas.
Related changes to articulate “Manufacturing Villages” &
“Innovation Partnership Zones (IPZ)”
Add reference to Map No. 14.3, ‘ Economic Development Strategy
Areas’
Revise Policy III.J. related to ‘Problem Areas” and ‘West Auburn’ to
clarify meaning of ‘Local Serving’ and ‘Region Serving’
B. Map Amendments
CPM #2 (File # CPA12-0002)
Map amendment to Map No. 14.1 – River Mobile Home Park (HCA Management)
to change the comprehensive plan designation from 'Public/Quasi-Public ' to
'Moderate Density Residential' of 6.36 acres of adjacent property Parcel #
0004000098. The mobile park is located at 3611 “I ST NE.
CPM #4 (File # CPA12-0004)
DI.D Page 68 of 78
Page 3 of 3
Map amendment to Map No. 14.1 – Auburn School District to change the
comprehensive plan designation of two parcels totaling 0.63 acres located SE of the
Auburn High School from ‘Office Residential’ to ‘Public/Quasi-Public’ and to change
12 parcels totaling 1.74 acres located NW of the school from "High Density
Residential" to "Public/Quasi-Public". The school is located at 800 4th ST NE.
CPM #5 Add new map No 14.3, ‘Economic Development Strategy Areas’
3. November 20, 2012 Planning Commission Hearing: (to be conducted)
A. Policy/Text Amendments
(None)
B. Map Amendments
CPM #3 (File # CPA12-0003)
Map amendment to Map No. 14.1 – Locke Property to change the Comprehensive
Plan designation from 'Single Family Residential' to 'High Density Residential' a
1.88-acre parcel#0921059132. The parcel is located at 12130 SE 310th ST.
SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
Attached to this memo is an updated summary table outlining the 2012 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments (Map and Policy/Text Amendments), staff’s recommendation, and the Planning
Commission’s recommendation for each amendment. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of all items but one. The Planning Commission’s recommendation for the remaining
item of the November 20, 2012 hearing is shown as “pending” since the hearing had not been
conducted by the time of writing of this memo.
Background Materials
Also included is the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments’ working binder. In the front of the
binder you will find an index to the contents of the binder. The binder is organized by:
Staff Reports;
Environmental Review;
General Information and Correspondence (includes comment letters from public);
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments; and
Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments.
If you have any questions on the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments please contact me by
email at jdixon@auburnwa.gov or at 253-804-5033.
DI.D Page 69 of 78
Ye
a
r
2
0
1
2
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
u
m
m
a
ry
(C
P
M
=
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
;
P
/
T
=
P
o
l
i
c
y
/
T
e
x
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Cr
e
a
t
e
d
:
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
1
2
Re
v
i
s
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Page 1 of 3
CP
M
#
Ti
t
l
e
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
St
a
f
f
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
PC
D
C
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
City Council Action Notes
CP
M
#
1
Ma
p
N
o
.
6
.
1
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fi
l
e
N
o
.
C
P
A
1
2
-
0
0
0
1
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
–
Re
v
i
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
M
a
p
N
o
.
6
.
1
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
CP
M
#2
Ma
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
,
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fi
l
e
N
o
.
C
P
A
1
2
-
0
0
0
2
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
–
Am
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
–
R
i
v
e
r
Mo
b
i
l
e
H
o
m
e
P
a
r
k
,
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
t
h
e
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
'
P
u
b
l
i
c
/
Q
u
a
s
i
-
Pu
b
l
i
c
'
t
o
'
M
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
'
a
n
d
re
z
o
n
e
f
r
o
m
‘
P
1
,
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
s
e
’
t
o
‘
R
M
H
C
,
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Mo
b
i
l
e
H
o
m
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
’
6
.
3
6
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
m
o
b
i
l
e
h
o
m
e
s
p
a
c
e
s
an
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
di
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
b
y
K
i
n
g
C
o
.
R
e
d
d
i
n
g
t
o
n
L
e
v
e
e
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
an
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
M
o
b
i
l
e
P
a
r
k
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
s
3
6
1
1
“I
”
S
T
N
E
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
CP
M
#3
Ma
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
,
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fi
l
e
N
o
.
C
P
A
1
2
-
0
0
0
3
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
–
Am
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
–
L
o
c
k
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
'
S
i
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
'
t
o
'H
i
g
h
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
'
a
n
d
r
e
z
o
n
e
f
r
o
m
‘
R
5
,
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
’
t
o
‘
R
2
0
,
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
’
a
1
.
8
8
-
a
c
r
e
p
a
r
c
el
to
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
s
1
2
1
3
0
S
E
3
1
0
th
S
T
.
(P
e
n
d
i
n
g
)
(
P
e
n
d
i
n
g
)
CP
M
#
4
Ma
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
,
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fi
l
e
N
o
.
C
P
A
1
2
-
0
0
0
4
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
–
Am
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
1
-
A
u
b
u
r
n
Sc
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Au
b
u
r
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
t
h
e
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
w
o
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
to
t
a
l
i
n
g
0
.
6
3
a
c
r
e
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
S
E
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
H
i
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
f
r
o
m
‘
O
f
f
i
c
e
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
’
t
o
‘
P
u
b
l
i
c
/
Q
u
a
s
i
-
Pu
b
l
i
c
’
a
n
d
r
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
‘
R
O
,
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
f
f
i
c
e
’
to
‘
I
,
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
’
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
pa
r
c
e
l
s
t
o
t
a
l
i
n
g
1
.
7
4
a
c
r
e
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
N
W
o
f
t
h
e
sc
h
o
o
l
a
n
d
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
"
H
i
g
h
De
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
"
t
o
"
P
u
b
l
i
c
/
Q
u
a
s
i
-
P
u
b
l
i
c
"
a
n
d
re
z
o
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
‘
R
2
O
,
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
’
t
o
‘
I
,
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
al
’
i
n
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
h
i
g
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
s
8
0
0
4
th
S
T
N
E
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
DI.D Page 70 of 78
Cr
e
a
t
e
d
:
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
1
2
Re
v
i
s
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
2
Page 2 of 3
CP
M
#
Ti
t
l
e
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
St
a
f
f
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
PC
D
C
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
City Council Action Notes
CP
M
#
5
Ma
p
N
o
1
4
.
3
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fi
l
e
N
o
C
P
A
1
2
-
0
0
0
1
,
A
d
d
n
e
w
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
ma
p
t
o
s
h
o
w
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
Ar
e
a
s
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#
Ti
t
l
e
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
St
a
f
f
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
PC
D
C
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
City Council Action Notes
P/
T
#1
Au
b
u
r
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(2
0
1
2
–
2
0
1
8
)
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#2
Di
e
r
i
n
g
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(2
0
1
3
–
2
0
1
8
)
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
D
i
e
r
i
n
g
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#3
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
(
2
0
1
3
–
20
1
8
)
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
0
1
3
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#4
Ke
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(2
0
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
–
20
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
)
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
K
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
0
1
2
/
2
0
1
3
–
20
1
7
/
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Au
b
u
r
n
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#5
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
’
s
6-
y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
20
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
’
s
6
-
y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
,
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
DI.D Page 71 of 78
Cr
e
a
t
e
d
:
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
1
2
Re
v
i
s
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
2
Page 3 of 3
P/
T
#
Ti
t
l
e
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
St
a
f
f
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
PC
D
C
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
City Council Action Notes
P/
T
#6
Re
v
i
s
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
s
2
a
n
d
5
o
f
t
h
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Re
v
i
s
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
2
–
‘
T
h
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
y
s
t
e
m
’
Re
v
i
s
e
(
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
)
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
3
‘
F
u
t
u
r
e
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
C
o
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
’
Re
v
i
s
e
t
e
x
t
p
a
g
e
s
2
-
1
4
t
h
r
u
2
-
1
5
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
3
.
Re
v
i
s
e
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
6
‘
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
’
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
3.
Re
v
i
s
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
5
–
‘
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
’
Up
d
a
t
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
:
T
R
-
1
9
,
T
R
-
2
0
&
T
R
-
2
1
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
Le
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
,
T
R
-
2
3
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
,
T
R
-
28
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
T
R
-
5
9
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
TR
-
1
6
3
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
.
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P/
T
#7
Re
v
i
s
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
14
o
f
t
h
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Re
v
i
s
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
1
4
–
‘
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
’
re
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
s
Re
v
i
s
e
p
a
g
e
s
1
4
-
2
5
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
1
4
-
2
8
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
ad
v
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
ar
e
a
s
.
Ad
d
t
h
r
e
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
t
o
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
t
e
re
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
t
o
‘
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
v
i
l
l
a
g
e
s
’
a
n
d
In
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
Z
o
n
e
s
(
I
P
Z
)
Ad
d
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
o
M
a
p
N
o
.
1
4
.
3
,
‘
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
A
r
e
a
s
’
Re
v
i
s
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
I
I
I
.
J
.
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
‘
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
A
r
e
a
s
”
a
n
d
‘W
e
s
t
A
u
b
u
r
n
’
t
o
c
l
a
r
i
f
y
‘
L
o
c
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
n
g
’
a
n
d
‘
R
e
g
i
o
n
Se
r
v
i
n
g
’
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
DI.D Page 72 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Director's Report
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 73 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
PCDC Matrix
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
PCDC Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only, see attached matrix.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 74 of 78
PC
D
C
W
o
r
k
P
l
a
n
M
a
t
r
i
x
–
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
Pl
e
a
s
e
N
o
t
e
:
N
e
w
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
u
n
d
e
r
l
i
n
e
d
,
d
e
l
e
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
mo
v
e
d
,
r
e
t
r
e
a
t
i
t
e
m
s
a
r
e
h
i
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
.
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
LA
N
D
U
S
E
C
O
D
E
S
/
P
O
L
I
C
I
E
S
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
1
•
M
u
c
k
l
e
s
h
o
o
t
T
r
i
b
e
TB
D
S
n
y
d
e
r
St
a
f
f
t
o
s
t
a
y
i
n
t
o
u
c
h
w
i
t
h
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
e
p
t
.
a
n
d
k
e
e
p
coordination &
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
p
e
n
w
i
t
h
T
r
i
b
e
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
m
e
t
w
i
t
h
t
he Muckleshoot Tribe
Ma
r
c
h
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
.
2
Co
d
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
W
o
r
k
•
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
C
o
d
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
–
Gr
o
u
p
2
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
W
a
g
n
e
r
Ph
a
s
e
I
I
,
G
r
o
u
p
2
C
o
d
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
P
l
anning Commission for
di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
o
n
1
0
/
0
2
/
1
2
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
ved by City Council on
11
/
5
/
1
2
.
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
C
o
d
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
w
e
n
t
t
o
P
l
a
nning Commission public
he
a
r
i
n
g
o
n
1
1
/
7
/
1
2
.
•
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
r
a
f
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
P
la
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
•
C
o
t
t
a
g
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
r
a
f
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
P
la
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
•
C
e
l
l
T
o
w
e
r
s
TB
D
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
P
C
D
C
o
n
9
/
1
0
/
1
2
a
n
d
c
o
d
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
a
t
P
lanning Commission on
10
/
2
/
1
2
.
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
r
e
t
u
r
n
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
th more information to
di
s
c
u
s
s
o
n
c
e
l
l
t
o
w
e
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
o
d
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
.
•
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
C
o
d
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
s
e
d on Council retreat direction.
•
A
g
r
i
t
o
u
r
i
s
m
TB
D
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
St
a
f
f
t
o
b
r
i
n
g
b
a
c
k
o
n
c
e
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
h
a
s reviewed and made their
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
3
Ur
b
a
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
•
H
e
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
20
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
w
o
r
k
p
l
a
n
.
•
T
A
D
A
TB
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
A
f
u
t
u
r
e
u
p
d
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
T
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n will be scheduled at a
la
t
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
•
A
m
t
r
a
k
On
-
g
o
i
n
g
Ma
y
o
r
L
e
w
i
s
/
Sn
y
d
e
r
Ci
t
y
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
p
s
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
s
t
u
dy by Amtrak.
DI.F Page 75 of 78
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
Page 2
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
•
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Ea
r
l
y
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
u
r
v
e
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
and data compilation
be
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
.
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
d
r
a
f
t
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
Contents with Committee on
10
/
0
8
/
1
2
.
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
St
a
f
f
w
i
l
l
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
t
e
a
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a
c
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
b
r
i
ng back to Committee.
5
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
A
r
e
a
s
f
o
r
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
20
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Co
d
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
C
o
uncil retreat direction.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
6
A
u
b
u
r
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
a
r
k
A
s
N
e
e
d
e
d
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
An
d
e
r
s
e
n
St
a
f
f
i
s
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
W
S
D
O
T
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
a
c
q
u
i
s
ition opportunities.
7
G
r
e
e
n
Z
o
n
e
S
u
m
m
i
t
2
0
1
2
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
An
d
e
r
s
e
n
St
r
u
c
k
du
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
’
s
I
P
Z
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e efforts for it.
8
Gr
e
e
n
Z
o
n
e
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
Pl
a
n
/
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
20
1
2
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
An
d
e
r
s
e
n
St
r
u
c
k
d
u
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
’
s
I
P
Z
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
d future efforts for it.
PA
R
K
S
,
A
R
T
S
&
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
9
L
e
a
H
i
l
l
/
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
C
C
P
a
r
k
T
B
D
F
a
b
e
r
Un
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
ed to be completed in
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
M
ay. Park to open in
Ju
n
e
o
f
2
0
1
3
.
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
10
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
TB
D
Hu
r
s
h
PC
D
C
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
a
t
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
;
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
to be scheduled.
11
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
H
u
r
s
h
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
p
r
o
v
id
e
d
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
o
r
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
.
12
Un
i
f
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
ce
n
t
r
a
l
i
z
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
TB
D
H
u
r
s
h
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
g
i
v
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
.
BO
A
R
D
S
,
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
S
&
H
E
A
R
I
N
G
E
X
A
M
I
N
E
R
13
A
r
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
F
a
b
e
r
J
o
i
n
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
he
l
d
o
n
1
1
/
1
4
/
1
1
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
DI.F Page 76 of 78
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
Page 3
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
14
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
H
u
r
s
h
J
o
i
n
t
m
ee
t
i
n
g
h
e
l
d
9
/
2
4
/
1
2
.
15
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
D
i
x
o
n
He
a
r
i
n
g
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
1
0
/
2
4
/
1
1
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
a
n
n
u
al briefing with the
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
16
P
a
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
S
u
m
m
e
r
2
0
1
3
F
a
b
e
r
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
c
c
u
r
r
e
d
6
/
1
1
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
17
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Sn
y
d
e
r
/
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Jo
i
n
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
h
e
l
d
J
u
l
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
2
.
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
w
i
l
l
h
old a joint meeting every six
mo
n
t
h
s
w
i
t
h
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
18
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
a
n
d
T
r
a
i
l
s
S
p
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
3
Th
o
r
d
a
r
s
o
n
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
c
c
u
r
r
e
d
5
/
2
3
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
19
U
r
b
a
n
T
r
e
e
B
o
a
r
d
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
F
a
b
e
r
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
cc
u
r
r
e
d
1
0
/
2
2
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
CA
P
I
T
A
L
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
(
L
o
n
g
R
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
)
20
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Sc
o
p
e
:
L
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
th
e
i
n
t
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
la
n
d
u
s
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
On
-
g
o
i
n
g
P
a
r
a
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
b
y
C
i
t
y
Council in 2009.
Up
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
plan update process.
21
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
(
T
I
P
)
Sc
o
p
e
:
6
-
y
e
a
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
a
t
i
s
up
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
20
1
3
Pa
r
a
Re
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Program (TIP) has been
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
P
C
D
C
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
o
o
k
a
c
t
i
o
n
o
n
the 2013-2018
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
T
I
P
)
a
t
t
h
e
9
/
1
7/12 City Council meeting.
22
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
I
P
)
Sc
o
p
e
:
6
-
y
e
a
r
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
fo
r
s
e
w
e
r
,
w
a
t
e
r
,
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
an
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
0
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Up
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
plan update process.
Pu
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
s
b
e
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
n
O
ctober 16th, November
7th
,
2
0
1
2
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
b
y
P
C
D
C
i
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
.
OT
H
E
R
23
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
A
s
N
e
e
d
e
d
M
a
y
o
r
F
u
t
ur
e
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
s
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
DI.F Page 77 of 78
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Presentation - Art's Commission Annual Report
Date:
November 19, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Brewer/McKnight
Meeting Date:November 26, 2012 Item Number:DI.G
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.G Page 78 of 78