The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-19-2013 2-19-2013 Finance Packet Finance Committee February 19, 2013 - 5:30 PM Annex Conference Room 1 AGENDA I.CALL TO ORDER A.Roll Call B.Announcements C.Agenda Modifications II.CONSENT AGENDA A. February 4, 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes* B. Claims Vouchers* (Coleman) Claims check numbers 420355 through 420664 in the amount of $4,309,850.92 and dated February 19, 2013. C. Payroll Vouchers Payroll check numbers 533602 through 533631 in the amount of $843,431.35 and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,190,039.16 for a grand total of $2,033,470.51. D. Bad Debt Write Off - Parks, Arts & Recreation* (Faber) City Council approve the write off of outstanding Parks, Arts & Recreation accounts in the amount of $3,641.00 III.ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 6451* (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to the combined utility systems of the City; providing for the issuance of one or more series of utility system revenue bonds of the City in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000.00 (1) to pay a portion of the cost of certain improvements described herein, (2) to make a deposit to the debt service reserve account, and (3) to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters IV.RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 4906* (Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, declaring certain items of property as surplus and authorizing their disposal V.DISCUSSION ITEMS Page 1 of 339 A. SCADA System Overview (Dowdy) B. December 2012 Financial Report* (Coleman) December 2012 Financial Report C. Ordinance No. 6456* (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013-2014 Biennial Budget ordinance, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013-2014 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" D. Resolution No. 4910* (Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to accept a federal grant to be administered through the Washington State Department of Transportation for the 37th Street and B Street NW Pre-Signal Project E. Resolution No. 4912* (Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to accept a federal grant to be administered through the Washington State Department of Transportation for the West Valley Highway System Preservation Project F. Resolution No. 4914* (Snyder) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the dedication of a portion of City-owned property as City Right-of-Way G. Resolution No. 4915* (Snyder) A Resolution of the City of Auburn, Washington, ratifying the amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies for consistency with Vision 2040 VI.ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet. Page 2 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: February 4, 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes Date: February 11, 2013 Department: Finance Attachments: Minutes Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:CA.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 339 Finance Committee February 4, 2013 - 5:30 PM Annex Conference Room 1 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER Chair John Partridge called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in Annex Conference Room 1 located on the second floor of the City Hall Annex at One East Main Street in Auburn. A. Roll Call Chair John Partridge, Vice Chair Largo Wales, and Member John Holman were present. City officials and staff members present included: Mayor Peter B. Lewis, Deputy Mayor Nancy Backus, Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, Planning and Development Director Kevin Snyder, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, and City Clerk Danielle Daskam. Also present were Lindsay Sovde of Seattle Northwest Securities and Scot Pondelik. B. Announcements There was no announcement. C. Agenda Modifications A revised Resolution No. 4903 was distributed prior to the meeting. Discussion of Ordinance No. 6451 was moved ahead on the agenda and immediately followed the Consent Agenda items. II. CONSENT AGENDA A. January 22, 2013 regular meeting minutes Vice Chair Wales moved and Member Holman seconded to approve the January 22, 2013 minutes. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3-0 B. 2012 Claims Vouchers (Coleman) 2012 claims check numbers 419991 through 420104 in the amount of $1,140,982.89 and dated February 4, 2013. Committee members reviewed the claims and payroll vouchers and briefly discussed claims vouchers 420170, 420028, 420042, and Page 1 of 6 CA.A Page 4 of 339 420329. Vice Chair Wales moved and Member Holman seconded to approve and forward claims and payroll vouchers to the full Council for consideration. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3-0 C. 2013 Claims Vouchers (Coleman) 2013 claims check numbers 420105 through 420354 in the amount of $1,020,319.21 and two wire transfers in the amount of $5,920.69 and dated February 4, 2013. Please see 2012 claims vouchers above for action on 2013 claims vouchers. D. Payroll Vouchers (Coleman) Payroll check numbers 533572 through 533601 in the amount of $263,434.11 and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,204,471.05 for a grand total of $1,467,905.16. Please see 2012 claims vouchers above for action on payroll vouchers. III. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 6446 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, establishing the Local Sales and Use Tax rate for Local Revitalization Financing for 2013 Finance Director Coleman stated that each year the City must pass an ordinance establishing the Local Sales and Use Tax rate for the year (State's fiscal year of July 1 - June 30). The City first applied for local revitalization financing in 2009 granting a project award of $250,000 annually. The tax credit is available to the City for up to 25 years. The City will be in its fourth year of receiving the tax credit. Finance Director Coleman reported that the debt service on the project will be approximately $470,000 in 2013. The tax credit and REET2 funds are used for debt service. Vice Chair Wales moved and Member Holman seconded to approve and forward Ordinance No. 6446 to the full Council. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3-0 IV. RESOLUTIONS Page 2 of 6 CA.A Page 5 of 339 A. Resolution No. 4894 (Coleman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the City of Auburn to impose a Sales and Use Tax as authorized by RCW 82.14.415 as a credit against State Sales and Use Tax relating to annexations Finance Director Coleman presented Resolution No. 4894. The Resolution levies the .1% sales tax credit against the state sales tax for annexation of the Lea Hill area. The City finds that the projected cost to provide municipal services to the annexation area is $5.8 million, which exceeds the projected general revenue of $5.2 million the City would otherwise receive from the annexation area on an annual basis. The Resolution authorizes the Finance Director to set the threshold for imposing the sales and use tax credit at $2,083,132.00 for the Lea Hill Annexation area. Vice Chair Wales moved and Member Holman seconded to approve and forward Resolution No. 4894 to the full Council for consideration. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3-0 V. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 22nd Street High Consumption (Coleman/Dowdy) Grant a water utility adjustment to three utility accounts for higher than normal consumption recorded on customer meters. Finance Director Coleman reported three residential utility customers contacted Finance over a period of approximately six weeks regarding high bills due to higher than normal consumption. Staff conducted a field investigation and determined there was no leak and the meters were working properly. However, the three customers insisted that they had not used the quantity of water recorded by the meters. Finance and Engineering staff reviewed the matter and determined that a construction project had been in progress in the area during the time of high consumption. The three meters were replaced and upon further testing, the cause of the high consumptions through the meters remains undetermined. The customers accounts are in good standing and the customer's consumption histories show that each experienced unusual usage. It is recommended that the Council approve a water utility adjustment to the three utility accounts for higher than normal consumption. The request was reviewed by the Public Works Committee and will be Page 3 of 6 CA.A Page 6 of 339 considered as part of the Consent Agenda at tonight's Council meeting. B. Ordinance No. 6451 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to the combined utility systems of the City; providing for the issuance of one or more series of utility system revenue bonds of the City in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000 (1) to pay a portion of the cost of certain improvements described herein, (2) to make a deposit to the debt service reserve account, and (3) to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters. Ordinance No. 6451 was discussed immediately following action on the Consent Agenda items. Finance Director Shelley Coleman introduced Lindsay Sovde of Seattle Northwest, the bond underwriters. Ordinance No. 6451 was prepared by the bond attorney, who could not attend the meeting this evening. The ordinance provides for the sale of revenue bonds to finance approximately $11.5 in utility projects. Ms. Sovde briefly reviewed the bond ordinance and pointed out Section 4, which delegates authority to sell the bonds within certain parameters that guide the financing. Recent legislation allows such a delegation ordinance that allows the Mayor or Finance Director to sign the bond purchase contract and allows more flexibility for bond pricing. Previous bond ordinances limited the ability to when bonds could be priced--typically on a Council meeting day so that the ordinance could be adopted that night. The bond ordinance provides for the issuance of $11.5 million in bonds that must be purchased before December 31, 2013. The interest rate cannot exceed five percent and the maturity date is not later than twenty years from issue. Ms. Sovde distributed a one-page handout that contained a General Obligation Bond Buyer Index History and a financing update for the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 2013 A&B as of January 25, 2013. Ms. Sovde stated that investors are interested in purchasing premium bonds as opposed to par or discount bonds. The premium bonds provide more upfront cash for a higher return for the investor over the life of the bond. Ms. Sovde stated that issuing $10.8 million in premium bonds will provide the City with $11.5 million. The average annual debt service on the bonds is approximately $786,000. Page 4 of 6 CA.A Page 7 of 339 Projects to be funded by the bond sale are included in Exhibit A of the ordinance and include: Fulmer Well Field Improvements, Well 4 Power and Chlorination, Water Repair and Replacements, Lakeland Hills Reservoir and Improvements, Water Meter and Billing Improvements, BNSF Utilities Crossing (Water), Auburn Way South Flooding Phase 2, 30th Street NE Area Flooding Phase 1 and BNSF Utilities Crossing (Storm Drainage). It is anticipated that the bond sale will occur February 28, 2013 and the proceeds distributed by mid March. Ms. Sovde briefly discussed the benefits and restrictions of issuing bank qualified bonds. Member Holman congratulated Mayor Lewis and Finance Director Coleman on the City's AA rating. Director Coleman stated Ordinance No. 6451 will be presented to the Committee again on February 19, 2013 for action. C. Resolution No. 4903 (Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to accept a federal grant to be administered through the Washington State Department of Transportation for the South 277th Street Corridor Capacity and Non-Motorized Trail Improvement Project Public Works Director Dowdy presented Resolution No. 4903, which will authorize the acceptance of a federal grant in the amount of $1,020,700.00 to finance the design, environmental permitting and property acquisition phases of the South 277th Street Corridor Capacity and Non-motorized Trail Improvement Project. The federal grant requires a 13.5% match from local funding sources. Funds from the 102 Fund will provide the local match. D. Ordinance No. 6341 - Current Fee Deferral Program (Tate) Committee to discuss the City's Fee Deferral Program currently scheduled to expire on April 4, 2013. Fee deferrals pertain to impact fees and system development charges for residential and non- residential development. Planning and Development Director Snyder reminded that Ordinance No. 6341, adopted in 2011, allows an applicant to defer payment of impact fees and system development charges for residential and non- residential development from the time of permit issuance to either certificate of occupancy or closing on the sale of a property. The deferral can be no longer than 18 months from the date of permit issuance. Page 5 of 6 CA.A Page 8 of 339 Director Snyder stated that Ordinance No. 6341 provided a two-year pilot program on fee deferrals. The program is slated to expire April 4, 2013. Director Snyder reported staff believes the program is a success and has met the goals and expectations of Council. The City has established good internal control procedures, the City has not had to initiate any enforcement actions because all fees have been paid on time. Director Snyder advised that the Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the Ordinance at its last meeting and recommended extending the Ordinance in perpetuity by eliminating the sunset clause. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. APPROVED this 19th day of February, 2013. ___________________________ _____________________________ John Partridge, Chair Danielle Daskam, City Clerk Page 6 of 6 CA.A Page 9 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Claims Vouchers Date: February 11, 2013 Department: Administration Attachments: Vouchers Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Approve the claims vouchers as part of the Consent Agenda. Background Summary: Claims check numbers 420355 through 420664 in the amount of $4,309,850.92 and dated February 19, 2013. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:CA.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B Page 10 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 1 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420355 2/6/2013 116120 AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST AWC-FEB2013 AWC PREMIUMS FOR RETIREES~ 001.98.517.210.25 37,517.12 AWC PREMIUMS FOR RETIREES~ 001.21.521.200.25 127.41 AWC PREMIUMS FOR RETIREES~ 001.98.522.210.25 10,412.61 AWC PREMIUMS FOR RETIREES~ 001.98.522.220.25 18,168.14 Total : 66,225.28 420356 2/13/2013 021988 GLOBAL BACKLINE LLC 602 EQUIPMENT FOR BACKLINE FOR JOURNEY 001.33.575.280.45 1,439.89 Total : 1,439.89 420357 2/19/2013 018176 3M TRAFFIC SAFETY SYSTEMS TP78440 36"X50 1177C GREEN EC FILIM FOR SIGNS~ 001.42.542.300.31 400.50 36"X50 1175C BLUE EC FILIM FOR SIGNS~ 001.42.542.300.31 400.50 36"X50 1172C RED EC FILIM FOR SIGNS~ 001.42.542.300.31 400.50 Sales Tax 001.42.542.300.31 114.14 TP78462 36"X50 3930 WHITE HIGH INTENSITY 001.42.542.300.31 567.00 Sales Tax 001.42.542.300.31 53.87 TP78463 36"X50 1177C GREEN EC FILIM FOR SIGNS~ 001.42.542.300.31 400.50 Sales Tax 001.42.542.300.31 38.04 1Page:CA.B Page 11 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 2 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,375.05 420357 2/19/2013 018176 018176 3M TRAFFIC SAFETY SYSTEMS 420358 2/19/2013 003827 A AGRO TREE INC.019410 Removal of dangerous tree in City Right 432.00.535.900.41 480.00 Sales Tax 432.00.535.900.41 45.60 Total : 525.60 420359 2/19/2013 020509 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC 171527 PRE EMPLOYMENT DRUG TEST - JARRELL RHEA 001.13.516.710.41 52.00 Total : 52.00 420360 2/19/2013 111501 ADS EQUIPMENT INC 33710 TROUBLESHOOT & REPAIR SEWER & STORM 432.00.535.900.31 414.82 Total : 414.82 420361 2/19/2013 021856 ADVANCED DIGITAL CONCEPTS 21162 Bluetooth installation for PD car~ 550.00.548.680.35 290.00 Sales Tax 550.00.548.680.35 25.52 Total : 315.52 420362 2/19/2013 115190 AGRI SHOP, INC 26312/1 MIC CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPPLIES ON 001.17.524.200.31 118.34 26669/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 430.00.534.800.31 102.49 26672/1 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.31 16.40 26699/1 MISC CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPPLIES 1/25/13 2Page:CA.B Page 12 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 3 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420362 2/19/2013 (Continued)115190 AGRI SHOP, INC 001.17.524.200.31 23.49 26731/1 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 19.70 26736/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 430.00.534.800.22 112.77 26755/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 430.00.534.800.35 19.69 26758/1 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 10.71 26763/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 431.00.535.800.31 38.27 26767/1 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 168.61 26790/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 432.00.535.900.35 121.85 26791/1 LAWN & GARDEN SUPPLIES, TOOLS & WORK 432.00.535.900.35 26.70 26792/1 COURSE TOOLS AND SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 30.81 26823/1 COURSE TOOLS AND SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 65.63 26827/1 Misc Facilities/Maintenance Supplies~ 505.00.524.500.31 31.72 26855/1 3Page:CA.B Page 13 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 4 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420362 2/19/2013 (Continued)115190 AGRI SHOP, INC PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 2.17 26866/1 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 2.19 26896/1 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 30.64 Total : 942.18 420363 2/19/2013 021675 AIRGAS SAFETY INC.9011801540 PPE inventory, 3M Virtua safety glasses 550.141.200 298.50 freight 550.141.200 23.87 Sales Tax 550.141.200 30.63 Total : 353.00 420364 2/19/2013 111950 ALBERTSONS, INC 6030375100035408 AROUND THE BELL SUPPLIES 001.33.574.240.31 96.91 SPECIALIZED REC SUPPLIES 001.33.574.240.31 25.70 SPECIALIZED REC COOKING CLUB SUPPLIES 001.33.574.240.31 43.77 SPECIALIZED REC YGENC SUPPLIES 001.33.574.240.31 26.03 LATE FEE 001.33.574.220.49 15.00 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 001.33.574.240.31 54.56 Total : 261.97 420365 2/19/2013 003949 ALMY, ROBERT 012613LEOFF 4Page:CA.B Page 14 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 5 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420365 2/19/2013 (Continued)003949 ALMY, ROBERT LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 262.99 012613LEOFF LEOFF 1 DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT APPROVED 001.98.517.210.25 109.00 Total : 371.99 420366 2/19/2013 112610 ALPINE PRODUCTS, INC.TM-129841 SIGNS, PAINT & SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 162.06 TM-129845 Aluminum Sign for Alarm~ 505.00.524.500.49 29.02 TM-129933 SIGNS, PAINT & SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 149.69 Total : 340.77 420367 2/19/2013 112910 AMERICAN HOSE & FITTINGS, INC A35296-001 VARIOUS HOSE & FITTINGS ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.31 56.03 A35296-002 VARIOUS HOSE & FITTINGS ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.31 20.28 A35361-001 VARIOUS HOSE & FITTINGS ON AN AS 430.00.534.800.31 14.65 Total : 90.96 420368 2/19/2013 113090 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.4148 WEBSITE JOB LISTING - DIRECTOR OF 001.13.516.100.44 50.00 Total : 50.00 420369 2/19/2013 113170 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 13925 5Page:CA.B Page 15 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 6 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420369 2/19/2013 (Continued)113170 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC APWA Developing Leader Course for 001.32.532.200.49 500.00 Total : 500.00 420370 2/19/2013 013634 ANDERSON, LOREN W.020113LEOFF LEOFF 1 DENTAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 433.20 Total : 433.20 420371 2/19/2013 393720 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6617871 CLEANING OF SHOP TOWELS AND MATS 001.33.576.100.41 30.82 655-6622457 Rubber Mat Service at various City 505.00.524.500.49 10.95 655-6622458 Rubber Mat Service at various City 505.00.524.500.49 13.80 655-6622459 Rubber Mat Service at various City 505.00.524.500.49 10.95 655-6623015 MAT AND TOWEL SERVICE 437.00.576.600.41 16.43 655-6623016 Rubber Mat Service at Gold Club House~ 505.00.524.500.41 75.56 655-6634249 Rubber Mat Service at Various City 505.00.524.500.41 10.95 655-6634250 Rubber Mat Service at Various City 505.00.524.500.41 13.80 655-6634251 Rubber Mat Service at Various City 6Page:CA.B Page 16 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 7 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420371 2/19/2013 (Continued)393720 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 505.00.524.500.41 10.95 655-6641527 CLEANING OF SHOP TOWELS AND MATS 001.33.576.100.41 44.95 Total : 239.16 420372 2/19/2013 021994 ARIMA MARINE INT INC 019769 UTILITY REFUND - 47 37TH ST NE 430.233.100 427.95 Total : 427.95 420373 2/19/2013 021355 ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS 050998 UTILITY REFUND - 132 9TH ST SE 430.233.100 16.13 Total : 16.13 420374 2/19/2013 014036 AST, PHILIP B.011813REIMB CDL re-imbursement for Phil Ast 430.00.534.800.49 85.00 Total : 85.00 420375 2/19/2013 110510 AT&T MOBILITY 875428076X02022013 ACCT #875428076 PD BAIT CAR~ 117.00.521.210.42 18.29 ACCT #875428076 PD BAIT CAR~ 001.32.532.200.42 73.16 Total : 91.45 420376 2/19/2013 114710 AUBURN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 23433A 3/2013 tourism svcs & info ctr & 104.00.557.300.41 3,750.00 3/2013 tourism svcs & info ctr & 001.98.558.100.49 3,333.34 Total : 7,083.34 420377 2/19/2013 114740 AUBURN CHEVROLET 5080350 7Page:CA.B Page 17 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 8 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420377 2/19/2013 (Continued)114740 AUBURN CHEVROLET VEHICLE PARTS AND SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.35 21.90 5080384 VEHICLE PARTS AND SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.35 104.50 Total : 126.40 420378 2/19/2013 009879 AUBURN CTR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC 406 BOOTH FEE AT CAREER CONFERENCE - HR 001.13.516.100.49 75.00 BOOTH FEE AT CAREER CONFERENCE - PARKS 001.33.574.220.49 75.00 407 BOOTH FEE AT CAREER CONFERENCE - POLICE 001.21.521.100.49 150.00 Total : 300.00 420379 2/19/2013 115550 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST #408 013958 BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL FACILITY USAGE 001.33.574.240.49 300.00 013959 BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL FACILITY USAGE 001.33.574.240.49 300.00 13899 USE OF RAINIER MIDDLE SCHOOL LIBRARY 001.17.557.200.49 30.00 13925 Facility Labor for Sustainability Movie 430.00.534.100.41 207.25 Facility Labor for Sustainability Movie 432.00.535.100.41 207.25 DEC2012 DEC 2012 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.173 161,781.50 JAN2013 8Page:CA.B Page 18 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 9 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420379 2/19/2013 (Continued)115550 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST #408 JAN 2013 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.173 170,477.04 Total : 333,303.04 420380 2/19/2013 115700 AUBURN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA 012913 TOURISM SERVICES CONTRACT FOR JANUARY 001.33.573.201.41 18,750.00 Total : 18,750.00 420381 2/19/2013 004445 AUBURN VALLEY COLLISION INC 7931 REPAIR OF UNIT P032H~ 550.00.548.680.48 2,674.70 Sales Tax 550.00.548.680.48 254.10 Total : 2,928.80 420382 2/19/2013 116060 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 26370 12 VASE BLOCKS, 10 X 10 436.00.536.200.34 408.00 Total : 408.00 420383 2/19/2013 017843 AWARENESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC 27001 WEB FILTERING SOFTWARE FOR SENIOR 001.33.574.210.31 248.00 Total : 248.00 420384 2/19/2013 120450 BAKER, JOHN MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420385 2/19/2013 020822 BANK OF AMERICA/SCARSELLA BROS 11-01/#11 M Street SE Grade Separation 102.00.594.420.65 27,066.90 Total : 27,066.90 9Page:CA.B Page 19 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 10 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420386 2/19/2013 017993 BANK OF WASHINGTON MAR2013 LOT A LEASE - 21 SO DIVISION ~ 505.00.524.500.45 1,850.00 LOT B LEASE - 36 WEST MAIN ST ~ 505.00.524.500.45 650.00 Total : 2,500.00 420387 2/19/2013 022006 BEADEX MANUFACTURING 071355 UTILITY REFUND - 401C ST NW 434.233.100 1,505.57 Total : 1,505.57 420388 2/19/2013 121090 BEARSCOVE, M. ERIC MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420389 2/19/2013 021848 B-FORCE PROTECTION SECURITY 0125 PARKS SECURITY FOR JANUARY 2013 001.33.576.100.41 1,300.00 Total : 1,300.00 420390 2/19/2013 122490 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO, INC 865936-80 ADAMS, C - REWORK VEST, CONCEALABLE 001.21.521.200.31 219.00 952600-80 HOCH - CREDIT FOR BUCKLE REPLACEMENT 001.21.521.200.31 -4.38 967638 PEARSON, J. - JUMPSUIT 001.21.521.210.22 870.53 974784 NELSON, J - BADGE/EMBLEM ON CANINE 001.21.521.200.22 20.70 976788-01 BOOTS - HESLAN, J.~ 10Page:CA.B Page 20 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 11 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420390 2/19/2013 (Continued)122490 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO, INC 001.21.521.300.22 131.39 977276-01 MATT, J. - HOLSTER; LETTERING/EMBLEMS 001.21.521.210.22 71.61 978450-01 METAL DETECTOR SUPER WAND 001.21.521.210.31 246.32 Total : 1,555.17 420391 2/19/2013 286220 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY M ST PROJECT Railroad Protective Liability Ins 102.00.594.420.65 1,150.00 Total : 1,150.00 420392 2/19/2013 122520 BOARD, MURRAY MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420393 2/19/2013 014249 BOOK-IT REPERTORY THEATRE 030913PERF FEB 23 PERFORMANCE "SKIPPY JOHN JONES" 001.33.575.280.41 606.96 Total : 606.96 420394 2/19/2013 123150 BOWDEN, HELEN J.MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420395 2/19/2013 013570 BOWEN, RILEY 010813REIMB CDL endorsement renewal for Riley Bowen 431.00.535.800.49 85.00 Total : 85.00 420396 2/19/2013 004837 BOWEN, STEVE A84026 Reimbursement for Safety Boot Purchase 11Page:CA.B Page 21 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 12 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420396 2/19/2013 (Continued)004837 BOWEN, STEVE 001.32.532.200.22 164.24 Total : 164.24 420397 2/19/2013 011519 BRADLEY & GUZZETTA, LLC 20282 Cable Administration for February 2013 518.00.518.880.41 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 420398 2/19/2013 022003 BRANDON, ROY & PAMELA 060049 UTILITY REFUND - 7204 REBECCA ACE SE 433.233.100 31.99 Total : 31.99 420399 2/19/2013 019143 BUNO CONSTRUCTION LLC 10-23/#20 LAKELAND HILLS BOOSTER PUMP STA IMPRVMTS 430.00.590.100.65 61,988.28 Total : 61,988.28 420400 2/19/2013 022005 BURKI, MICHELLE 069012 UTILITY REFUND - 6127 ISACC AVE SE #E 434.233.100 5.24 Total : 5.24 420401 2/19/2013 242330 C & M GLASS CO., INC 1829 REPLACEMENT GLASS 001.33.576.100.31 213.53 Total : 213.53 420402 2/19/2013 130252 C R W SYSTEMS, INC.12-377/BAL ArcGIS Server License Agreement~ 518.00.518.880.64 7,500.00 Total : 7,500.00 420403 2/19/2013 130510 CALDWELL, BRUCE 102212LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 159.98 12Page:CA.B Page 22 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 13 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 159.98 420403 2/19/2013 130510 130510 CALDWELL, BRUCE 420404 2/19/2013 012572 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS J49351 RUBBER STRAPS: 15', 21' AND 31' 001.33.576.100.31 358.20 Total : 358.20 420405 2/19/2013 013511 CANNON, GAIL 010813REIMB MILEAGE/PARKING FOR L/I TRAINING IN 001.13.516.100.43 22.51 Total : 22.51 420406 2/19/2013 021879 CARINO, GLENDA 012313REIMB MOUSE PAD FOR WORK 001.11.513.100.31 14.77 Total : 14.77 420407 2/19/2013 013685 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC 0126217 Academy Booster Pump Station 430.00.590.100.65 5,379.85 0126219 Lakeland Hills Booster Pump Station 430.00.590.100.65 1,023.50 Total : 6,403.35 420408 2/19/2013 131330 CASCADE COFFEE INC 208029317 COFFEE FOR RESALE 437.00.576.680.34 231.61 Total : 231.61 420409 2/19/2013 012029 CASCADIA INTERNATIONAL LLC 716303T PARTS & REPAIR SERVICES ON AN AS 550.00.548.100.31 48.08 716477T PARTS & REPAIR SERVICES ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.35 19.16 13Page:CA.B Page 23 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 14 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 67.24 420409 2/19/2013 012029 012029 CASCADIA INTERNATIONAL LLC 420410 2/19/2013 131540 CASH & CARRY 154342 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS AND REC. PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 23.16 155349 GROCERIES AND SUPPLIES FOR THE SENIOR 001.33.574.210.31 132.29 156224 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS AND REC. PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 26.21 156395 CANDY, CHIPS AND COFFEE SUPPLIES 437.00.576.680.34 96.60 158389 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS AND REC. PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 23.16 158688 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS AND REC. PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 18.32 Total : 319.74 420411 2/19/2013 001022 CDW-GOVERNMENT, INC.W756516 Printer for Central Stores~ 518.00.518.880.35 266.31 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.35 25.30 W838288 HP 3-year priority exchange warranty 518.00.518.880.35 76.16 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.35 7.24 Total : 375.01 420412 2/19/2013 370450 CENTURYLINK 021913PHONES PHONE USAGE - JANUARY 2013 14Page:CA.B Page 24 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 15 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420412 2/19/2013 (Continued)370450 CENTURYLINK 518.00.518.880.42 1,313.47 PHONE USAGE - JANUARY 2013 431.00.535.800.42 161.24 PHONE USAGE - JANUARY 2013 430.00.534.800.42 141.17 PHONE USAGE - JANUARY 2013 432.00.535.900.42 57.46 Total : 1,673.34 420413 2/19/2013 132550 CHEVRON U S A INC.37135810 STATEMENT FOR PD GAS CHARGES - 01-06-13 001.21.521.200.31 451.55 Total : 451.55 420414 2/19/2013 131890 CHS - CENEX HARVEST STATES INC 120475 Propane for Golf Course ~ 505.00.524.500.32 1,174.03 120544 PROPANE FOR GOLF MAINT. BLDG. 437.00.576.600.32 431.70 246430 LEASE OF PROPANE TANKS AT THE THE CLUB 437.00.576.680.45 1.10 246489 LEASE OF PROPANE TANKS AT THE THE CLUB 437.00.576.680.45 65.70 247061 LEASE OF LP TANK, CEMETERY 436.00.536.200.45 65.70 Total : 1,738.23 420415 2/19/2013 132940 CINTAS CORPORATION #461 461223742 UNIFORM LAUNDRY SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.100.49 125.83 461226845 15Page:CA.B Page 25 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 16 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420415 2/19/2013 (Continued)132940 CINTAS CORPORATION #461 UNIFORM LAUNDRY SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.100.49 125.83 Total : 251.66 420416 2/19/2013 005032 CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.91373844 Citrix Netscaler VPX 10-Enterprise 518.00.518.880.48 791.10 XenApp Enterprise Edition 4.5~ 518.00.518.880.48 2,777.40 XenApp Enterprise from XenApp Advanced 518.00.518.880.48 500.00 Citrix NetScaler VPX 10-Enterprise 518.00.518.880.48 731.51 Citrix XenApp Presentation Server 518.00.518.880.48 1,714.04 Citrix XenApp (Presentation Server) 518.00.518.880.48 438.90 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.48 660.53 Total : 7,613.48 420417 2/19/2013 115760 CITY OF AUBURN 021913UTILITIES UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 505.00.524.500.47 4,406.67 UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 001.33.576.100.47 6,429.94 UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 001.42.542.300.47 1,125.45 UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 431.00.535.800.47 189.43 UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 432.00.535.900.47 167.44 UTILITIES - WATER/SEWER/STORM JANUARY 001.17.562.100.47 16.95 16Page:CA.B Page 26 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 17 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 12,335.88 420417 2/19/2013 115760 115760 CITY OF AUBURN 420418 2/19/2013 122820 CITY OF BONNEY LAKE, WA 19942500000 PUMP STATION AT KERSEY WAY - 2013 WATER 430.00.534.800.47 33.28 19943720100 PUMP STATION AT 7100 LAKE TAPPS DR SE - 431.00.535.800.47 22.10 19943910000 PUMP STATION AT 2610 LAKE TAPPS PKY SE 431.00.535.800.47 22.10 Total : 77.48 420419 2/19/2013 008837 CITY OF KENT - UTILITY BILLING 628-25602.01 JAN WATER SERVICE AT VERDANNA SEWER 431.00.535.800.47 380.45 Total : 380.45 420420 2/19/2013 016906 CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR 88046153 CONTRACT FOR AUBURN STATION BANNERS - 104.00.557.300.41 5,200.00 Total : 5,200.00 420421 2/19/2013 012703 CLEVELAND GOLF / SRIXON 6817303 RESALE OF CLUBS, BAGS, HEADWEAR, ETC. 437.00.576.680.34 165.75 Total : 165.75 420422 2/19/2013 021309 COASTAL FARM & HOME SUPPLY LLC 412 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR PARKS 001.33.576.100.31 38.31 Total : 38.31 420423 2/19/2013 009720 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES T2509173-2 Misc Facilities Supplies Coastwide, per 505.00.524.500.31 28.27 T2510522 17Page:CA.B Page 27 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 18 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420423 2/19/2013 (Continued)009720 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES RUBBERMAID PRODUCTS AND CIGARETTE 437.00.576.600.31 552.43 T2518065 Misc Facilities Supplies Coastwide, per 505.00.524.500.31 185.62 Total : 766.32 420424 2/19/2013 015158 COBRA BEC, INC 20694 Roof Repairs-Gambini Building~ 505.00.524.500.48 536.55 Total : 536.55 420425 2/19/2013 007461 COMCAST 8498300990001659 8498 3402 1065 8730 HSI Account~ 518.00.518.880.42 122.62 8498 3400 1015 3551 29630 Green River 437.00.576.680.42 107.62 8498 3403 9023 1043 1180 Lake Tapps 001.32.532.200.42 112.56 8498 3402 1115 7096 Senior Center~ 001.33.574.210.42 67.62 8498 3400 1034 3400 Internet link for 001.32.532.200.42 77.57 8498 3402 1071 9193 Cable and Internet 001.33.575.280.42 184.88 8498 3400 1011 1450 12402 SE 320th St~ 001.32.532.200.42 112.62 8498 3402 1065 8748 Internet Link for 518.00.518.880.42 122.62 8498 3403 9023 6919 Internet Link for 518.00.518.880.42 87.56 8498 3402 1127 1277 Internet Link for 518.00.518.880.42 82.57 8498 3401 1123 1744 Internet Link for 518.00.518.880.42 81.90 18Page:CA.B Page 28 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 19 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,160.14 420425 2/19/2013 007461 007461 COMCAST 420426 2/19/2013 112280 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 0220-560733 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 1,221.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR WHITE RIVER 001.33.576.100.31 493.18 0220-560772 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 145.86 0220-560810 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 450.70 0220-560855 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 203.67 0220-561052 Misc Facilities Supplies CED per Lisa 505.00.524.500.31 257.16 0220-561076 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 179.14 0220-561378 ELECTRICAL AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 55.74 Total : 3,006.78 420427 2/19/2013 011708 CONSOLIDATED PRESS PRINTING 8079 Mailing services; prep BRAVO postcard 518.00.518.780.42 855.24 8080 Mailing services; prep BRAVO postcard 518.00.518.780.42 855.24 Total : 1,710.48 420428 2/19/2013 021978 CONTROLLED FORCE INC.5725 19Page:CA.B Page 29 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 20 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420428 2/19/2013 (Continued)021978 CONTROLLED FORCE INC. CONTROLLED F.O.R.C.E. LEVEL 1 AND LEVEL 001.21.521.100.49 2,610.00 Total : 2,610.00 420429 2/19/2013 014391 COPPER FALLS RESTAURANT 012613INV FOOD FOR 1/26 GOLF TOURNAMENT 651.237.142 1,438.85 Total : 1,438.85 420430 2/19/2013 021999 CORNEJO, JUAN 052304 UTILITY REFUND - 3305 M PL SE 430.233.100 5.71 Total : 5.71 420431 2/19/2013 020936 COVARRUBIAS, AMALIA 030243 UTILITY REFUND - 13048 SE 305TH PL 430.233.100 51.70 Total : 51.70 420432 2/19/2013 017753 CREATIVE OFFICE 13-10358 plotter paper per Dave Burdick - 001.32.532.200.31 317.49 Total : 317.49 420433 2/19/2013 009272 CSG SYSTEMS, INC.730188 CSG - Utility Statement print,fold, 430.00.534.110.41 761.05 CSG - Utility Statement print,fold, 431.00.535.110.41 761.05 CSG - Utility Statement print,fold, 432.00.535.910.41 761.05 CSG - Utility Statement print,fold, 434.00.537.110.41 761.05 CSG - Utility Statements -Postage 430.00.534.110.42 1,478.94 20Page:CA.B Page 30 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 21 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420433 2/19/2013 (Continued)009272 CSG SYSTEMS, INC. CSG - Utility Statements -Postage 431.00.535.110.42 1,478.94 CSG - Utility Statements -Postage 432.00.535.910.42 1,478.94 CSG - Utility Statements -Postage 434.00.537.110.42 1,478.92 Total : 8,959.94 420434 2/19/2013 140000 D & L SUPPLY & MFG INC 282920 Urinal Kits and Closet Kits, Repair 505.00.524.500.31 1.59 282953 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 22.86 282962 Urinal Kits and Closet Kits, Repair 505.00.524.500.31 65.65 283134 Urinal Kits and Closet Kits, Repair 505.00.524.500.31 91.76 Total : 181.86 420435 2/19/2013 140330 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3270366 Req for Proposals Published in Daily 432.00.590.100.65 1,121.10 Total : 1,121.10 420436 2/19/2013 140510 DAROUGH, DORIS G 020513LEOFF DECEMBER 2012 LONG TERM CARE FOR LEOFF 001.98.517.210.25 11,031.19 JANUARY 2013 LONG TERM CARE FOR LEOFF 1 001.98.517.210.25 11,011.00 Total : 22,042.19 420437 2/19/2013 141600 DIERINGER SCHOOL DIST DEC2012 21Page:CA.B Page 31 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 22 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420437 2/19/2013 (Continued)141600 DIERINGER SCHOOL DIST DEC 2012 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.171 17,500.00 JAN2013 JAN 2013 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.171 10,005.00 Total : 27,505.00 420438 2/19/2013 142280 DON SMALL & SONS OIL DIST CO 27680 Bulk ultra low sulfur red dyed Diesel 550.141.100 7,822.50 Sales Tax 550.141.100 873.05 28028 Bulk fuel for M&O, Regular unleaded 550.141.100 29,192.33 Sales Tax 550.141.100 4,463.30 MAR2013 JAN-JUNE 2013 PARKING LOT LEASE @ 505.00.524.500.45 1,300.00 Total : 43,651.18 420439 2/19/2013 142280 SOUND PUMP & EQUIPMENT 20067 FUEL SUPPLIES FOR GOLF MAINT. 437.00.576.600.31 38.27 20124 FUEL SUPPLIES FOR GOLF MAINT. 437.00.576.600.41 773.07 Total : 811.34 420440 2/19/2013 142333 DONUT & MUFFIN FACTORY 27 DONUTS FOR PARKS AND REC PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 18.40 Total : 18.40 22Page:CA.B Page 32 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 23 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420441 2/19/2013 019444 DOWLING INC.020113INV HOUSING REPAIR--SHARON SHOE'S ROOF 119.00.559.200.63 5,000.00 020213INV HOUSING REPAIR--DOROTHY PREUETT'S ROOF 119.00.559.200.63 3,847.83 020413INV HOUSING REPAIR--JEAN ROY'S ROOF REPLACED 119.00.559.200.63 4,228.89 020713INV HOUSING REPAIR--JEANNE BARBERA'S ROOF 119.00.559.200.63 4,993.46 Total : 18,070.18 420442 2/19/2013 012962 DTI SPORTS INC.4298 SHIRTS FOR FLAG FOOTBALL 001.33.574.240.31 926.37 Total : 926.37 420443 2/19/2013 143000 DUKES, MARION MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420444 2/19/2013 003968 DUNBAR ARMORED INC 3187585 FEB ARMORED CAR SERV AT PARKS 001.33.574.100.41 501.31 3187811 ARMORED CAR SERVICES FOR THE GOLF COURSE 437.00.576.680.41 724.43 Total : 1,225.74 420445 2/19/2013 014095 DYNAMIC BRANDS 820292 PUSH CARTS, BAGS, ETC... 437.00.576.680.34 719.67 820409 23Page:CA.B Page 33 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 24 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420445 2/19/2013 (Continued)014095 DYNAMIC BRANDS PUSH CARTS, BAGS, ETC... 437.00.576.680.34 752.17 Total : 1,471.84 420446 2/19/2013 150890 EDWARDS, CALI ANN 012613LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.517.210.25 47.30 MEIDCARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,246.10 420447 2/19/2013 022008 ESTRADA, JUAN PEDRO REFUND UTILITY FEES ON PERMIT SWR06-0215 431.343.533 85.00 UTILITY FEES ON PERMIT SWR06-0215 431.396.101 850.00 Total : 935.00 420448 2/19/2013 017551 EVERGREEN FIRE & SECURITY 13-0290 Cameras in Parking Garage 518.00.518.880.48 255.00 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.48 24.23 Total : 279.23 420449 2/19/2013 013291 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 5787435 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.31 46.48 5805989 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.31 100.71 Total : 147.19 420450 2/19/2013 013660 EXTEND NETWORKS, INC 13-13030 24Page:CA.B Page 34 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 25 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420450 2/19/2013 (Continued)013660 EXTEND NETWORKS, INC Barracuda Message Archiver 650~ 518.00.518.880.35 13,160.12 Barracuda Message Archiver 650 1 Yr 518.00.518.880.35 3,818.21 Barracuda Message Archiver, 1 year 518.00.518.880.35 3,110.96 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.35 1,908.48 13-13036 Spectra T50e, 2 drives, 25 slots~ 518.00.518.880.35 13,767.00 Spectralogic 5 slot COD License t50e~ 518.00.518.880.35 1,544.00 Spectralogic 1 slot COD License t50e~ 518.00.518.880.35 308.88 Spectra 5 years, T50e, SpectraGuard NBD 518.00.518.880.35 8,976.00 Spectra Tera Pack: each pk has 10 LTO-6 518.00.518.880.35 5,919.40 Spectra Logic LTO Maintenance TeraPack 518.00.518.880.35 206.25 Spectralogic SAS Cable (mini SAS to 518.00.518.880.35 845.20 SpectraLogic T50 credit 518.00.518.880.35 -800.00 freight 518.00.518.880.35 122.58 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.35 2,934.48 Total : 55,821.56 420451 2/19/2013 016371 FARMERS INSURANCE 87043895112012 FLOOD INSURANCE RENEWAL 501.00.517.700.46 695.00 25Page:CA.B Page 35 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 26 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 695.00 420451 2/19/2013 016371 016371 FARMERS INSURANCE 420452 2/19/2013 007114 FASTENAL CO WAAUB43491 NUTS, BOLTS & SCREWS ON AN AS REQUIRED 431.00.535.800.31 12.06 Total : 12.06 420453 2/19/2013 013069 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEC2012 DEC 2012 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.174 30,249.00 JAN2013 JAN 2013 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 124.237.174 10,179.00 Total : 40,428.00 420454 2/19/2013 160600 FERRELLGAS 1074648302 PROPANE FOR OLSON FARM (FARMHOUSE) 001.33.575.300.32 358.49 Total : 358.49 420455 2/19/2013 019291 FIELD ASSET SERVICES LLC 050184 UTILITY REFUND - 37 49TH ST NW 430.233.100 26.21 Total : 26.21 420456 2/19/2013 008661 FIRE PROTECTION INC.9468 Runway Alarm Repair~ 505.00.524.500.48 388.73 Total : 388.73 420457 2/19/2013 161085 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS CO 874-W2013-28339 RECORDING FEES FOR ORDINANCES 6431, 001.15.514.300.49 161.00 Total : 161.00 420458 2/19/2013 005710 FISHER, FRED 013113LEOFF LEOFF 1 DENTAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 26Page:CA.B Page 36 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 27 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420458 2/19/2013 (Continued)005710 FISHER, FRED 001.98.522.220.25 90.00 013113LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.220.25 90.00 MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.522.220.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,378.80 420459 2/19/2013 011917 FISK, JAMES MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.522.220.25 599.40 Total : 599.40 420460 2/19/2013 161170 FITZ TOWING, LLC 23977 TOWING FOR 2007 FORD MUSTANG FROM FALL 001.21.521.210.41 943.34 Total : 943.34 420461 2/19/2013 161410 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC.211740 PARTICIPANTS ADMINISTRATION FEES~ 001.14.514.230.41 1,020.20 Total : 1,020.20 420462 2/19/2013 161980 FOSTER PEPPER PLLC 1028676 legal services Oct&Nov 2012 001.14.514.100.41 3,728.00 Total : 3,728.00 420463 2/19/2013 162250 FRED MEYER STORES- CUST CHARGE 645224 SUPPLIES FOR JAN LATE NIGHT PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 51.87 645225 SUPPLIES FOR JAN LATE NIGHT PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 13.11 645229 27Page:CA.B Page 37 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 28 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420463 2/19/2013 (Continued)162250 FRED MEYER STORES- CUST CHARGE SUPPLIES FOR JAN LATE NIGHT PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 32.96 645232 SUPPLIES FOR JAN LATE NIGHT PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 66.30 Total : 164.24 420464 2/19/2013 011116 FSH COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 000588761 PAYPHONE SERVICES~ 435.00.546.100.42 55.00 PAYPHONE SERVICES~ 518.00.518.880.42 55.00 Total : 110.00 420465 2/19/2013 170090 G O S PRINTING CORP 79494 Printing services for City of Auburn 518.00.518.780.41 604.31 Total : 604.31 420466 2/19/2013 018506 GAME FARM FIVE LLC 069334 UTILITY REFUND - 1325 29TH ST SE 430.233.100 229.62 Total : 229.62 420467 2/19/2013 017120 GEO-DYNAMICS i-10589 HOUSING REPAIR--LARRY OLLOM'S FURNACE 119.00.559.200.63 1,576.92 Total : 1,576.92 420468 2/19/2013 019276 GLOBAL SECURITY AND 4099344 SECURITY AT MARY OLSON FARM 001.33.575.300.41 179.85 Total : 179.85 420469 2/19/2013 017578 GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.340865 FULLMER WELLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS-DESIGN~ 28Page:CA.B Page 38 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 29 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420469 2/19/2013 (Continued)017578 GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 430.00.590.100.65 9,478.22 Total : 9,478.22 420470 2/19/2013 021995 GOLDMAN, DR JACK 023365 UTILITY REFUND - 803 E MAIN ST 430.233.100 7.57 UTILITY REFUND - 803 E MAIN ST 431.233.100 12.10 UTILITY REFUND - 803 E MAIN ST 432.233.100 10.11 UTILITY REFUND - 803 E MAIN ST 433.233.100 22.88 UTILITY REFUND - 803 E MAIN ST 434.233.100 26.07 Total : 78.73 420471 2/19/2013 021991 GOLF WASHINGTON ENTERPRISES GW013013A GOLF COURSE ADVERTISING: JANUARY 30TH, 437.00.576.680.44 399.00 Total : 399.00 420472 2/19/2013 012454 GOODBYE GRAFFITI SEATTLE 17549 REMOVAL OF GRAFFITI AT VARIOUS PARKS 001.33.576.100.41 3,087.42 Total : 3,087.42 420473 2/19/2013 171620 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS, INC 565438 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.31 53.14 566817 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.100.31 167.13 566834 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.31 52.43 29Page:CA.B Page 39 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 30 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420473 2/19/2013 (Continued)171620 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS, INC 567532 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.141.100 281.77 567536 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 20.79 567613 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.100.31 118.14 567693 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 35.89 567749 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 36.53 567760 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 65.57 567893 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.141.100 161.93 567903 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 163.92 567910 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 65.57 567912 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 57.15 567916 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 20.72 568114 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 30Page:CA.B Page 40 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 31 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420473 2/19/2013 (Continued)171620 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS, INC 437.00.576.600.31 155.11 568138 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 71.18 568143 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.100.31 34.93 568180 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 33.39 568219 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.00.548.680.35 9.06 568224 MOTOR PARTS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 550.141.100 105.88 568704 PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.31 11.38 Total : 1,721.61 420474 2/19/2013 014448 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC.07-8984 12 Month Insight Enterprise User 518.00.518.880.48 7,000.00 12 Month Governmentjobs.com 518.00.518.880.48 487.50 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.48 711.31 Total : 8,198.81 420475 2/19/2013 172290 GREEN RIVER COMM COLLEGE 124426 Operator Registration for Pete Deraitus 430.00.534.800.49 175.00 Total : 175.00 31Page:CA.B Page 41 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 32 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420476 2/19/2013 172400 GRIFFIS HEATING INC S-12408 HOUSING REPAIR--LAURA SANTOS DE 119.00.559.200.63 2,540.75 Total : 2,540.75 420477 2/19/2013 180120 H D FOWLER CO I3295794 WATER/SEWER/STORM SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 430.00.534.800.31 48.30 I3299350 PVC Coupling~ 505.00.524.500.48 14.33 Total : 62.63 420478 2/19/2013 180640 HANNITY, DAVID 012513LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.220.25 226.00 Total : 226.00 420479 2/19/2013 022011 HARBOR HOMES REFUND OVERPYMT ON PERMIT SWR13-078 431.343.533 67.00 REFUND OVERPYMT ON PERMIT SWR13-022 431.343.533 67.00 Total : 134.00 420480 2/19/2013 019830 HARPER, JONATHAN 052656 UTILITY REFUND - 2111 62ND ST SE 433.233.100 75.75 Total : 75.75 420481 2/19/2013 011670 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 6033532 HYDRANT AND WATER SERVICE PARTS ON AN 430.00.534.800.31 46.32 Total : 46.32 420482 2/19/2013 181230 HEAD-QUARTERS 3345-7 32Page:CA.B Page 42 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 33 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420482 2/19/2013 (Continued)181230 HEAD-QUARTERS PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 437.00.576.600.45 223.50 Total : 223.50 420483 2/19/2013 020789 HEARST SEATTLE MEDIA LLC 016010002 PETPALOOZA AND PERFORMING ART PROGRAMS 001.33.573.201.44 499.90 Total : 499.90 420484 2/19/2013 181395 HEINEMAN, BRENDA 092612REIMB LUNCH MTG REGARDING CEMETERY MGMT 001.13.516.100.43 33.04 Total : 33.04 420485 2/19/2013 181560 HENDERSON, ED 011613LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.210.25 19.00 MEIDCARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.522.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,217.80 420486 2/19/2013 005843 HINSHAW'S MOTORCYCLE STORE 95931841 PARTS, SUPPLIES AND SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.48 471.53 Total : 471.53 420487 2/19/2013 020485 HORIZON CONSTRUCTION SERV, INC 28482 HOUSING REPAIR--JUDITH COLBERT'S FLOORS 119.00.559.200.63 1,910.78 28591 HOUSING REPAIR--DELORES HALVORSON'S 119.00.559.200.63 4,366.51 Total : 6,277.29 420488 2/19/2013 183210 HUSEBY, RICHARD 010913LEOFF 33Page:CA.B Page 43 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 34 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420488 2/19/2013 (Continued)183210 HUSEBY, RICHARD LEOFF 1 DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT APPROVED 001.98.522.210.25 843.00 011013LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.210.25 125.60 Total : 968.60 420489 2/19/2013 003195 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS INC 385463 TRUCK PARTS & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.48 753.15 Total : 753.15 420490 2/19/2013 183300 HYDRAULIC INSTALLATION 67764 HYDRAULIC PARTS & SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.48 650.39 Total : 650.39 420491 2/19/2013 190360 IMAGE MASTERS INC 109208 NAMEPLATES, STAMPS, ETC. ON AN AS 431.00.535.800.31 87.05 109232 PERMIT CENTER STAMPS~ 001.17.524.200.31 8.21 109250 APD GLASS MUG 001.21.521.100.31 74.46 109291 NAME TAG PLATES - INVESTIGATIONS 001.21.521.210.31 14.78 Total : 184.50 420492 2/19/2013 002701 INFORM PUGET SOUND 2298 ADVERTISING/POSTER DISTRIBUTION 001.33.575.300.44 603.60 Total : 603.60 34Page:CA.B Page 44 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 35 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420493 2/19/2013 020644 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC W3X63101-05 SEWER PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS-DESIGN 431.00.590.100.65 2,335.77 Total : 2,335.77 420494 2/19/2013 017804 JAN HOY DESIGN 40915 DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MUSEUM 001.33.575.300.41 275.00 Total : 275.00 420495 2/19/2013 200600 JARGER, DAVID MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420496 2/19/2013 012244 JILLIAN ENTERPRISES, LLC MAR2013 2013 THEATER LEASE @ $6259.82/MO 001.33.575.280.75 3,721.68 2013 THEATER LEASE @ $6259.82/MO 001.33.575.280.83 2,538.14 Total : 6,259.82 420497 2/19/2013 021928 JONES, MATTHEW & ERIN 071045 UTILITY REFUND - 11544 SE 319TH PL 430.233.100 133.97 Total : 133.97 420498 2/19/2013 022001 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA 057882 UTILITY REFUND - 29624 132ND AVE SE 432.233.100 25.09 Total : 25.09 420499 2/19/2013 018264 JUST FOR LAUGHS 022213PERF COMEDY SHOW ON 2/22/2013 001.33.575.280.41 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 35Page:CA.B Page 45 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 36 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420500 2/19/2013 210360 K C ADMIN BLDG FILING FEES FILING FEES, LIENS 430.00.534.110.41 1,080.00 Total : 1,080.00 420501 2/19/2013 210360 KING COUNTY RADIO 00432770 SERIAL #466AVY8634 - REPLACED CASE~ 001.21.521.100.48 477.04 00432771 SERIAL #466AXU0933 - REPLACED BROKEN 001.21.521.100.48 477.04 00432772 SERIAL #466ABW3734 - REPLACED CASE~ 001.21.521.100.48 477.04 00432774 SERIAL #466AWG1222 - TESTED AND ALIGNED 001.21.521.100.48 110.92 00432794 SERIAL #466AVY8592 - RADIO LCD DISPLAY 001.21.521.100.48 477.04 Total : 2,019.08 420502 2/19/2013 210360 K C FINANCE 11000769 Monthly INET Services Contract~ 518.00.518.880.42 471.00 Total : 471.00 420503 2/19/2013 021966 KCHA - GREEN RIVER HOMES REFUND HYDRANT DEPOSIT - PERMIT HYD12-0008 430.399.501 1,449.00 Total : 1,449.00 420504 2/19/2013 021996 KELLER, BRIAN 027060 UTILITY REFUND - 11803 SE 323RD PL 430.233.100 163.69 Total : 163.69 36Page:CA.B Page 46 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 37 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420505 2/19/2013 008857 KENYON DISEND, PLLC 16945 1/2013 legal svcs - New Cingular 001.14.514.100.41 948.12 Total : 948.12 420506 2/19/2013 020638 KITSAP SAFETY 6829 PPE Inventory, Port Authority F253 navy 550.141.200 734.40 Port Authority F253 navy sweatshirt 550.141.200 711.45 Port Authority F292 navy sweatshirt 550.141.200 573.00 Port Authority CP90 black beanie hat 550.141.200 180.00 Sales Tax 550.141.200 208.89 6879 PPE Inventory, Class 3 high visibility 550.141.200 161.00 Class 3 high visibility orange safety 550.141.200 1,840.00 Sales Tax 550.141.200 190.10 Total : 4,598.84 420507 2/19/2013 020890 KRONOS INCORPORATED 10730733 SQL Migration for Telestaff 518.00.518.880.41 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00 420508 2/19/2013 010586 LAKES ELECTRIC, INC.00012382 EMERGENCY REPAIR OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 430.00.534.800.48 361.14 Total : 361.14 420509 2/19/2013 221050 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC 0212002-IN 37Page:CA.B Page 47 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 38 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420509 2/19/2013 (Continued)221050 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC DEFENSIVE ENGAGEMENT TARGET 001.21.521.100.31 1,198.40 ORIGINAL NEW MEXICO TARGET 001.21.521.200.31 2,778.39 Total : 3,976.79 420510 2/19/2013 021404 LENNAR NORTHWEST INC.070401 UTILITY REFUND - 6710 ELAINE AVE SE 431.233.100 39.43 UTILITY REFUND - 6710 ELAINE AVE SE 433.233.100 62.41 070554 UTILITY REFUND - 13002 SE 308TH ST 430.233.100 68.82 070726 UTILITY REFUND - 6706 ELAINE AVE SE 431.233.100 129.49 Total : 300.15 420511 2/19/2013 221710 LES SCHWAB TIRES 31600050882 TIRES, BATTERIES, ALIGNMENTS AND OTHER 550.00.548.680.35 103.59 39700057607 TIRES, BATTERIES, ALIGNMENTS AND OTHER 430.141.100 65.81 39700058132 TIRES, BATTERIES, ALIGNMENTS AND OTHER 550.00.548.680.48 176.30 39700058237 TIRES, BATTERIES, ALIGNMENTS AND OTHER 550.00.548.680.35 219.00 Total : 564.70 420512 2/19/2013 222155 LIQUIVISION TECHNOLOGY INC 4331 RESERVOIR 4A, 1MG CLEANING/INSPECTION 38Page:CA.B Page 48 of 339 CA.B Page 49 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 40 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420516 2/19/2013 (Continued)222200 LOWE'S HIW, INC 11652 Misc Facilities Supplies Lowes per Lisa 505.00.524.500.31 19.74 16820 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 -87.12 23122 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 41.92 23154 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 53.88 23177 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 432.00.535.900.35 10.64 23253 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 4.74 23269 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 22.09 23292 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 76.54 23308 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 9.03 23322 PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MANT. 001.33.576.100.31 91.98 23339 Misc Facilities Supplies Lowes per Lisa 505.00.524.500.31 26.90 23349 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 40Page:CA.B Page 50 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 41 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420516 2/19/2013 (Continued)222200 LOWE'S HIW, INC 001.33.576.100.31 186.58 23372 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 22.80 23394 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 130.81 23484 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.31 17.11 23542 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 001.42.542.300.31 103.48 23578 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 5.72 23592 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.31 12.02 23953 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 13.47 23987 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 54.21 24001 PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MANT. 001.33.576.100.31 14.50 24014 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 432.00.535.900.31 26.98 24062 Misc Facilities Supplies~ 505.00.524.500.35 22.31 24066 41Page:CA.B Page 51 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 42 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420516 2/19/2013 (Continued)222200 LOWE'S HIW, INC SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.31 48.91 24067 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 13.48 24080 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.35 92.58 24103 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 31.17 24121 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 14.99 24181 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 21.41 24283 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.31 7.57 24295 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 -13.05 24301 Misc Facilities Supplies Lowes per Lisa 505.00.524.500.31 13.38 24370 Misc Facilities Supplies~ 505.00.524.500.35 25.98 Misc Facilities Supplies~ 505.00.524.500.31 3.29 24371 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 432.00.535.900.35 27.00 24390 42Page:CA.B Page 52 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 43 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420516 2/19/2013 (Continued)222200 LOWE'S HIW, INC SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 430.00.534.800.31 32.80 24400 Misc Facilities Supplies Lowes per Lisa 505.00.524.500.31 26.06 24439 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 19.55 24501 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 431.00.535.800.31 98.68 24539 COURSE SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 70.28 24682 COURSE SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 27.00 24795 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 4.41 24823 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 33.65 24836 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.33.576.100.31 72.85 24879 SMALL TOOLS, LAWN, GARDEN & 432.00.535.900.31 54.52 24954 Misc Traffic/Public Works Supplies - 001.32.532.200.31 38.18 24993 COURSE SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 26.98 43Page:CA.B Page 53 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 44 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420516 2/19/2013 (Continued)222200 LOWE'S HIW, INC 924970 CREDIT TAKEN IN ERROR ON CK 420230 001.33.576.100.31 13.05 Total : 1,809.47 420517 2/19/2013 012034 LOZIER, RADINE 021913PC PETTY CASH REIM. FOR THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.31 141.36 PETTY CASH REIM. FOR THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.43 46.28 Total : 187.64 420518 2/19/2013 021051 MACDONALD MILLER FACILITY PM025620 Repairs and Mechanical Maint for HVAC 505.00.524.500.48 2,463.75 Total : 2,463.75 420519 2/19/2013 233620 MAINSTREET SIGNS & GRAPHICS 4409 HOURS SIGN & GATE LOCKED SIGN AT 436.00.536.100.31 67.89 Total : 67.89 420520 2/19/2013 231130 MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL BRONZE 91622980 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.34 4.50 Total : 4.50 420521 2/19/2013 013433 MCAFEE 95905365 McAfee Email Protection and Continuity. 518.00.518.880.49 680.00 95947613 McAfee Email Protection and Continuity. 518.00.518.880.49 680.00 Total : 1,360.00 420522 2/19/2013 015872 MCKNIGHT, MAIJA 020813REIMB 44Page:CA.B Page 54 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 45 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420522 2/19/2013 (Continued)015872 MCKNIGHT, MAIJA SUPPLIES FOR ARTIST SELECTION PANEL 001.33.573.201.31 73.29 Total : 73.29 420523 2/19/2013 014100 MELODY MUSIC 022213PERF DJ SERVICE FOR DADDY DAUGHTER DATE 001.33.573.901.41 690.00 Total : 690.00 420524 2/19/2013 232610 METRO - KC DEPT OF FINANCE 30002187 King County Metro sewer disposal 433.00.535.800.51 1,199,585.15 Total : 1,199,585.15 420525 2/19/2013 232970 MICROFLEX CORP IN1327432 SG-375L Size large Safegrip disposable 550.141.300 365.55 Sales Tax 550.141.300 34.73 Total : 400.28 420526 2/19/2013 233000 MICROFLEX INC 00021020 Jan-Dec 2013 taxtools data conversion 001.14.514.230.41 300.00 Total : 300.00 420527 2/19/2013 019308 MILES RESOURCES LLC 11-13/#18 A STREET NW EXTENSION~ 102.00.594.420.65 27,109.41 A STREET NW EXTENSION~ 430.00.590.100.65 179.58 A STREET NW EXTENSION~ 102.00.594.420.65 7,642.78 Total : 34,931.77 420528 2/19/2013 233210 MILES SAND AND GRAVEL 855252 45Page:CA.B Page 55 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 46 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420528 2/19/2013 (Continued)233210 MILES SAND AND GRAVEL SAND & GRAVEL ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 001.42.542.300.31 294.29 Total : 294.29 420529 2/19/2013 019124 MOBILE EVENTS UNLIMITED LLC 020213INV GAMES 2U TECHNOLOGY VAN FOR THE 2/2/13 001.33.574.240.49 327.41 Total : 327.41 420530 2/19/2013 021920 MOLEN, BRUCE 034649 UTILITY REFUND - 714 HI CREST DR 432.233.100 25.67 UTILITY REFUND - 714 HI CREST DR 434.233.100 3.31 Total : 28.98 420531 2/19/2013 016787 MULTICARE HEALTHWORKS 79271 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL - JARRELL RHEA 001.13.516.710.41 279.50 Total : 279.50 420532 2/19/2013 006025 MURANO, DIERDRE RUTH 051512INV SPANISH INTERPRETER SERVICES RENDERED 001.21.521.210.41 100.00 Total : 100.00 420533 2/19/2013 021853 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES INC 12-1360-3 WATER FACILITIES EVALUATION STUDY~ 430.00.534.100.41 3,463.80 Total : 3,463.80 420534 2/19/2013 014285 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE MK406243-GLO Chairs for Meeting Room~ 505.00.524.500.49 1,851.97 Total : 1,851.97 46Page:CA.B Page 56 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 47 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420535 2/19/2013 241610 NATL REC & PARK ASSOC 86460 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FOR KRISTY PACHCIARZ 001.33.573.901.49 150.00 Total : 150.00 420536 2/19/2013 021998 NOACK, JASON & ELAINE 049784 UTILITY REFUND - 6106 THOMAS CT SE 431.233.100 19.10 UTILITY REFUND - 6106 THOMAS CT SE 433.233.100 256.22 Total : 275.32 420537 2/19/2013 000533 NORSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC 49031 SNOW PLOW AND SPARE CUTTING EDGE 001.33.576.100.35 6,578.00 Sales Tax 001.33.576.100.35 624.91 Total : 7,202.91 420538 2/19/2013 250210 OFFICE DEPOT 1538936643 OFFICE SUPPLIES 436.00.536.100.31 31.84 1540369885 OFFICE SUPPLIES 436.00.536.100.31 -23.09 1544152254 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.31 233.19 641710937001 Misc Office Supplies for PW/Eng - 001.32.532.200.31 50.98 641711215001 Misc Office Supplies for PW/Eng - 001.32.532.200.31 19.91 642654867001 PADLOCK 47Page:CA.B Page 57 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 48 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420538 2/19/2013 (Continued)250210 OFFICE DEPOT 001.21.521.100.31 19.70 642713271001 Red pens 001.32.525.100.31 2.39 Colored file folders 001.32.525.100.31 8.78 Yellow file folders 001.32.525.100.31 10.30 Writing pads 001.32.525.100.31 9.96 Sticker name badges 001.32.525.100.31 2.52 Sales Tax 001.32.525.100.31 3.23 642713523001 Eartips for wireless headset 001.32.525.100.31 9.95 Sales Tax 001.32.525.100.31 0.95 643035929001 RE-WRITEABLE CD'S 001.21.521.200.31 61.79 64314657001 Misc Office Supplies for PW/Eng - 001.32.532.200.31 181.13 643146897001 Misc Office Supplies for PW/Eng - 001.32.532.200.31 6.54 643175196001 ROLLING MAIL CART 001.21.521.100.31 37.66 Total : 667.73 420539 2/19/2013 122670 OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 002629 paper for city usage 48Page:CA.B Page 58 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 49 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420539 2/19/2013 (Continued)122670 OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 518.00.518.780.31 69.55 002640 paper for city usage 518.00.518.780.31 278.23 158804 Office Supplies for legal dept 001.15.515.100.31 412.83 158991 Office Supplies for legal dept 001.15.515.100.31 24.52 169354 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CITY CLERKS. 001.15.514.300.31 13.59 169419 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CITY CLERKS, 001.15.514.300.31 15.23 178369 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS, PARKS MAINT, 001.33.574.220.31 73.43 178802 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS, PARKS MAINT, 437.00.576.600.31 21.90 236532 Printing of council committee mtg 518.00.518.780.41 528.33 236533 Printing of council committee mtg 518.00.518.780.41 153.85 290271 paper for city usage 518.00.518.780.31 695.55 293502 paper for city usage 518.00.518.780.31 695.55 298693 49Page:CA.B Page 59 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 50 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420539 2/19/2013 (Continued)122670 OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC paper for city usage 518.00.518.780.31 566.09 348476 Printing of council committee mtg 518.00.518.780.41 219.15 348477 Printing of council committee mtg 518.00.518.780.41 163.44 526308 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CITY CLERKS, 001.15.514.300.31 24.13 996717 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 001.42.543.100.31 44.00 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 430.00.534.800.31 44.00 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 431.00.535.800.31 44.00 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 432.00.535.900.31 44.00 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 550.00.548.100.31 44.03 996850 OFFICE EQUIP & SUPPLIES FOR M&O 550.00.548.100.31 18.55 Total : 4,193.95 420540 2/19/2013 013832 ORKIN, INC.8616640 PEST CONTROL OLSON FARM 001.33.575.300.41 176.55 Total : 176.55 420541 2/19/2013 022004 ORR, MEGAN & ANDREW 062863 UTILITY REFUND - 4930 DIANA CT SE 430.233.100 116.31 50Page:CA.B Page 60 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 51 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 116.31 420541 2/19/2013 022004 022004 ORR, MEGAN & ANDREW 420542 2/19/2013 016417 PACIFIC COAST MEMORIALS, INC 12-03401 MARKERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: KAMOTO, 436.00.536.200.34 1,140.00 12-03402 MARKERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: KAMOTO, 436.00.536.200.34 425.00 12-03403 MARKERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: KAMOTO, 436.00.536.200.34 425.00 12-03436 MARKERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: KAMOTO, 436.00.536.200.34 650.00 12-03437 MARKERS FOR THE FOLLOWING: KAMOTO, 436.00.536.200.34 580.00 12-03501 FLAT GRASS MARKER, TAYLOR, ADEL & MARGA 436.00.536.200.34 310.00 12-03502 AURORA GRANITE CUSTOM MARKER, NEIGEL, 436.00.536.200.34 1,825.00 Total : 5,355.00 420543 2/19/2013 020416 PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA S3015-13-0838 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0839 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0840 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0841 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 51Page:CA.B Page 61 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 52 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420543 2/19/2013 (Continued)020416 PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0842 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 35.04 S3015-13-0843 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0844 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 35.04 S3015-13-0845 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 8.76 S3015-13-0846 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0847 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 8.76 S3015-13-0849 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 35.04 S3015-13-0851 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0852 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 17.52 S3015-13-0853 PIZZA FOR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 001.33.574.240.31 26.28 Total : 289.08 420544 2/19/2013 261620 PARKER PAINT MFG CO, INC 954021017428 SUPPLIES AND PAINT TO PAINT STAGE 52Page:CA.B Page 62 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 53 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420544 2/19/2013 (Continued)261620 PARKER PAINT MFG CO, INC 001.33.575.280.31 93.33 954021017457 Paint Supplies for Facilities (Lift Off) 505.00.524.500.31 19.69 Total : 113.02 420545 2/19/2013 016025 PAUL YESTER PRODUCTIONS AAT130204 SOUND/LIGHT TECH SERVICES FOR AUBURN 001.33.575.280.41 300.00 Total : 300.00 420546 2/19/2013 012214 PEARL BUILDING SERVICES 7592 2013 JANITORAL SVCS FOR CITY FACILITIES 505.00.524.500.41 350.00 7593 2013 JANITORAL SVCS FOR CITY FACILITIES 505.00.524.500.41 1,900.00 7594 2013 JANITORAL SVCS FOR CITY FACILITIES 505.00.524.500.41 200.00 7603 JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR PARKS 001.33.576.100.41 300.00 Total : 2,750.00 420547 2/19/2013 262190 PEARPOINT INC CD173198 REPAIR PARTS & SERVICE BY PEARPOINT ON 432.00.535.900.31 87.73 Total : 87.73 420548 2/19/2013 012125 PERFECT DRIVE GOLF & UTILITY 2155397 CART SUPPLIES/BATTERIES, BRAKES, 437.00.576.680.31 1,371.76 2157559 CART SUPPLIES/BATTERIES, BRAKES, 53Page:CA.B Page 63 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 54 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420548 2/19/2013 (Continued)012125 PERFECT DRIVE GOLF & UTILITY 437.00.576.680.31 3,924.92 Total : 5,296.68 420549 2/19/2013 016179 PETEK, PH.D, THOMAS C.8341 PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION - JARRELL RHEA 001.21.521.100.41 300.00 Total : 300.00 420550 2/19/2013 262690 PETERSEN, WILLIAM R 020413LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.210.25 33.43 Total : 33.43 420551 2/19/2013 262640 PETERSON COMPANY 1235067 CHEESE FOR THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.31 496.48 Total : 496.48 420552 2/19/2013 262840 PHILLIPS, CLIFFORD W MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420553 2/19/2013 262910 PHILLIPS, ROBERT S MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,198.80 420554 2/19/2013 263070 PIERCE CO BUDGET & FINANCE DEP AR143625 2013 Pierce Co. Regional Council dues 001.11.511.600.49 348.86 Total : 348.86 420555 2/19/2013 263070 PIERCE COUNTY AUDITOR FILING FEES 2013 FILING FEES, LIENS 430.00.534.110.41 144.00 54Page:CA.B Page 64 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 55 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 144.00 420555 2/19/2013 263070 263070 PIERCE COUNTY AUDITOR 420556 2/19/2013 013146 PING, INC 11589206 RESALE OF BAGS, CLUBS AND MISC 437.00.576.680.34 1,018.35 11599638 RESALE OF BAGS, CLUBS AND MISC 437.00.576.680.34 176.22 Total : 1,194.57 420557 2/19/2013 263350 PITNEY BOWES INC PostageFunds Postage funds for mail machine (first 518.00.518.780.42 10,000.00 Total : 10,000.00 420558 2/19/2013 263510 PLATT ELECTRIC 3087057 Misc Facilities Supplies Platt Electric 505.00.524.500.31 449.51 3140863 ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES ON AN AS 001.42.542.300.31 88.04 3163786 ELECTRICAL PARTS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 001.33.576.100.31 52.15 3178546 Misc Facilities Supplies Platt Electric 505.00.524.500.31 24.13 3186415 ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES ON AN AS 431.00.535.800.31 53.63 3186473 ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES ON AN AS 001.42.542.300.31 109.24 Total : 776.70 420559 2/19/2013 263630 PNTA 01-7047904-0 55Page:CA.B Page 65 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 56 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420559 2/19/2013 (Continued)263630 PNTA AUBURN AVE THEATER EQUIPMENT FOR 2013 001.33.575.280.35 194.24 Total : 194.24 420560 2/19/2013 263805 POLLARDWATER.COM I343495-IN WATER PARTS & SUPPLIES ON AN AS 430.00.534.800.35 242.98 Total : 242.98 420561 2/19/2013 014645 POPPLETON, KAREN E.NETHERTON FOOT CARE SERVICES AT THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.41 20.00 W.SCHWAB FOOT CARE SERVICES AT THE SENIOR CENTER 001.33.574.210.41 20.00 Total : 40.00 420562 2/19/2013 264140 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 45076616 ACETYLENE AND OTHER WELDING SUPPLIES 001.33.576.100.31 165.17 Total : 165.17 420563 2/19/2013 019648 PRIME ELECTRIC INC 108075 10 Hours of Labor @$802.51~ 518.00.518.880.41 1,096.78 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.41 104.19 Total : 1,200.97 420564 2/19/2013 002719 PRINTCO, INC 050576 Printing service for City of Auburn 518.00.518.780.41 374.49 Total : 374.49 420565 2/19/2013 265130 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 13-0155/BAL CLEAN AIR ASSESSMENT-BALANCE OWED ON 56Page:CA.B Page 66 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 57 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420565 2/19/2013 (Continued)265130 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 001.17.558.100.51 800.00 Total : 800.00 420566 2/19/2013 265220 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 021913ELE/GAS ELECTRICAL AND GAS CHARGES JANUARY 2013 001.42.542.300.47 15,566.07 ELECTRICAL AND GAS CHARGES JANUARY 2013 431.00.535.800.47 3,191.27 Total : 18,757.34 420567 2/19/2013 265700 PUYALLUP, CITY OF J.FINK/PLOT98 MARKER SETTING FEE~ 436.00.536.200.34 257.09 Total : 257.09 420568 2/19/2013 270210 QUIRING MONUMENTS, INC 132887 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 69.00 132924 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132925 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132926 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132927 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132928 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132929 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 57Page:CA.B Page 67 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 58 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420568 2/19/2013 (Continued)270210 QUIRING MONUMENTS, INC 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 132930 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 133118 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS 436.00.536.200.34 278.00 133272 MARKER INSCRIPTIONS, ROLAND GOSLAND 436.00.536.200.34 90.00 Total : 1,067.00 420569 2/19/2013 020623 R.E. MULLINAX INVESTIGATIONS 13-703 POLICE BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION - TYSON 001.13.516.710.41 650.00 13-705 POLICE BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION - TYSON 001.13.516.710.41 650.00 Total : 1,300.00 420570 2/19/2013 011267 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC RTS0001970 2013 PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM 001.21.521.200.41 40,946.08 Total : 40,946.08 420571 2/19/2013 021667 REDICK, MARGARET JANE 38475 SENIOR LINE DANCING: ~ 001.33.574.210.41 140.00 Total : 140.00 420572 2/19/2013 001829 RELIABLE MAILING &1148 Mail house services for large scale 518.00.518.780.42 82.13 Total : 82.13 420573 2/19/2013 017340 RESOURCE STEWARDS, LLC 1083 58Page:CA.B Page 68 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 59 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420573 2/19/2013 (Continued)017340 RESOURCE STEWARDS, LLC Refreshment materials for 430.00.534.100.41 17.76 Refreshment materials for 432.00.535.100.41 17.76 Sales Tax 430.00.534.100.41 1.70 Sales Tax 432.00.535.100.41 1.68 1084 Consultant Services (10 Hours) for 430.00.534.100.41 400.00 Consultant Services (10 Hours) for 432.00.535.100.41 400.00 1085 Residential Recycling Program~ 434.00.537.120.41 420.00 1086 AUBURN SCHOOLS RECYCLING PROGRAM~ 434.00.537.120.41 80.00 1087 Safeway Refreshments- Cookies for 430.00.534.100.41 7.50 Safeway Refreshments- Cookies for 432.00.535.100.41 7.50 Safeway Refreshments - Coffee for 3 430.00.534.100.41 19.50 Safeway Refreshments - Coffee for 3 432.00.535.100.41 19.50 Sales Tax 430.00.534.100.41 1.85 Sales Tax 432.00.535.100.41 1.84 Total : 1,396.59 420574 2/19/2013 021040 RICOH USA INC.88335870 59Page:CA.B Page 69 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 60 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420574 2/19/2013 (Continued)021040 RICOH USA INC. Copier Leases for January 2013~ 518.00.518.880.45 6,569.66 88495951 Copier Leases for Febrary 2013~ 518.00.518.880.45 6,569.66 Total : 13,139.32 420575 2/19/2013 003580 RIGHT! SYSTEMS, INC 119319 8.5 hours installation & integration, 518.00.518.880.41 2,250.00 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.41 213.75 Total : 2,463.75 420576 2/19/2013 000916 RIVERTON CONTRACTORS INC.16-OCT Sewer Repair South of Safeway~ 431.00.535.800.48 8,431.50 Total : 8,431.50 420577 2/19/2013 020410 ROBBINS COMPANY 1725344 HELIUM/CYLINER RENTALS 001.33.574.220.45 52.56 1725346 HELIUM/CYLDINER RENTAL FOR THE SENIOR 001.33.574.210.45 13.14 Total : 65.70 420578 2/19/2013 005162 ROBERTSON, CAROLYN 013113REIMB MILEAGE/PARKING TO MTGS 1/2-1/31 001.11.513.100.43 709.49 Total : 709.49 420579 2/19/2013 272800 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES CO, INC 06917003102 DRAIN CLEANING AND UNPLUGGING 001.33.576.100.41 371.20 60Page:CA.B Page 70 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 61 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 371.20 420579 2/19/2013 272800 272800 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES CO, INC 420580 2/19/2013 009835 RUSNAK, LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW J.020613INV 2013 PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT JANAUARY 001.13.516.100.41 30,416.66 Total : 30,416.66 420581 2/19/2013 280000 S & B INC SB-23302 DMS computer (COBAN) not able to write 518.00.518.880.48 300.00 Sales Tax 518.00.518.880.48 28.50 Total : 328.50 420582 2/19/2013 013072 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.05043-143913 WINDSHIELD REPAIRS & INSTALLATION ON AN 550.00.548.680.35 359.89 05043-143925 WINDSHIELD REPAIRS & INSTALLATION ON AN 550.00.548.680.48 32.80 Total : 392.69 420583 2/19/2013 014110 SATCOM DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS 57282841 Sat phone invoices for year 001.32.525.100.42 97.90 Total : 97.90 420584 2/19/2013 280870 SCARFF MOTORS, INC 542891 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 288.38 543401 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.141.100 74.31 543402 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 576.75 543439 61Page:CA.B Page 71 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 62 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420584 2/19/2013 (Continued)280870 SCARFF MOTORS, INC AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 178.68 543475 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.100.31 63.99 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 63.99 543505 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.100.31 -63.99 543580 ~AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS 550.00.548.680.35 8.09 543581 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 8.09 543621 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 66.42 543661 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 8.09 543737 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.141.100 16.18 543928 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.141.100 76.93 543954 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.35 21.33 544011 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.141.100 224.11 544042 62Page:CA.B Page 72 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 63 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420584 2/19/2013 (Continued)280870 SCARFF MOTORS, INC AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.141.100 114.43 C18364 LOWER AND UPPER BALL JOINTS FOR 450 FORD 437.00.576.600.41 873.06 c18440 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.48 54.70 c18503 AUTO REPAIR & SERVICE ON AN AS REQUIRED 550.00.548.680.48 486.98 Total : 3,140.52 420585 2/19/2013 280865 SCARSELLA BROS INC 11-01/#11 M Street SE Grade Separation 102.00.594.420.65 514,271.11 12-04/#1 Well 1 Transmission Main, Contract 430.00.590.100.65 237,183.23 Well 1 Transmission Main, Contract 432.00.590.100.68 209,044.68 RETAINAGE 430.223.400 -11,859.16 RETAINAGE 432.223.400 -9,705.38 Total : 938,934.48 420586 2/19/2013 019208 SCORE 263 HEALTH SERVICES COSTLESS SENIOR 001.20.523.600.51 278.30 269 HEALTH SERVICES COSTLESS SENIOR 001.20.523.600.51 45.72 Total : 324.02 63Page:CA.B Page 73 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 64 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420587 2/19/2013 014952 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE 05-916917 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.141.100 124.74 05-918584 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.141.100 216.07 05-919097 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.141.100 13.62 05-922337 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.00.548.680.35 51.94 05-923448 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.00.548.680.35 29.03 05-923834 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES FROM 550.141.100 21.62 Total : 457.02 420588 2/19/2013 282040 SEATTLE TIMES 107302 CP1202 RFP AUBURN WAY SOUTH FLOODING 432.00.590.100.65 1,155.14 LEGAL ADS FOR MONTH OF JANUARY CUSTOMER 001.15.514.300.44 860.78 Total : 2,015.92 420589 2/19/2013 015690 SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP C767193-701 ENGINEERING WIDE FORMAT COPIER LEASE~ 518.00.518.880.45 54.75 Total : 54.75 420590 2/19/2013 001484 SHIVELY, VICTOR G.MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 1,198.80 64Page:CA.B Page 74 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 65 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,198.80 420590 2/19/2013 001484 001484 SHIVELY, VICTOR G. 420591 2/19/2013 017545 SHOWCASE MEDIA 898 ADVERTISING FOR 2013 BRAVO SHOWS 001.33.573.201.44 200.00 Total : 200.00 420592 2/19/2013 001187 SHRED-IT USA INC 101307620 PAPER/DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICES FOR 001.33.574.100.41 49.50 Total : 49.50 420593 2/19/2013 284000 SLUYS, EDWARD J 011713LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.210.25 219.27 MEDICARE/LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICARE PART B REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.522.210.25 1,198.80 Total : 1,418.07 420594 2/19/2013 021938 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC E97149 FUEL FILTER, OIL FILTER, AIR FILTER 437.00.576.600.31 92.02 Total : 92.02 420595 2/19/2013 018737 SOUND PUBLISHING 520738 ADVERTISING FOR THE MUSEUM 001.33.575.300.44 345.00 Total : 345.00 420596 2/19/2013 284900 SOUND TRANSIT 25083 4TH QTR OPERATING EXPS AT TRANSIT 505.00.524.500.45 2,241.00 Total : 2,241.00 420597 2/19/2013 012558 SOUTH SOUND PRINTING 2015377 Printing services for City of Auburn 65Page:CA.B Page 75 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 66 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420597 2/19/2013 (Continued)012558 SOUTH SOUND PRINTING 518.00.518.780.41 111.69 Total : 111.69 420598 2/19/2013 285460 SPECTRUM SIGN CO INC 13943 DECALS & VARIOUS GRAPHIC MATERIAL ON AN 550.00.548.680.35 32.85 Total : 32.85 420599 2/19/2013 016482 SPIKE'S GOLF SUPPLIES, INC.743536 GOLF TEES AND MISC ITEMS 437.00.576.680.34 721.03 Total : 721.03 420600 2/19/2013 019295 STAN BONHAM COMPANY INC F57129 JACOBSEN PARTS AND TRACTOR SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 7.21 Q64023 JACOBSEN PARTS AND TRACTOR SUPPLIES 437.00.576.600.31 303.87 Total : 311.08 420601 2/19/2013 002733 STAR RENTAL & SALES, INC 33-086979-03 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PARKS MAINT. 001.33.576.100.45 329.82 Total : 329.82 420602 2/19/2013 286270 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 3216202 SUPPLIES, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT ON AN AS 550.141.300 46.38 Total : 46.38 420603 2/19/2013 012317 STEVE JENSEN HOMES LTD 070166 UTILITY REFUND - 13024 SE 308TH ST 430.233.100 47.59 UTILITY REFUND - 13024 SE 308TH ST 431.233.100 1.47 66Page:CA.B Page 76 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 67 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420603 2/19/2013 (Continued)012317 STEVE JENSEN HOMES LTD UTILITY REFUND - 13024 SE 308TH ST 432.233.100 1.22 UTILITY REFUND - 13024 SE 308TH ST 433.233.100 2.79 Total : 53.07 420604 2/19/2013 000284 STOP TECH LIMITED LLC T000274-IN (10) BLACK STOP STICK RACK KITS/SETS; 001.21.521.200.35 5,191.85 Total : 5,191.85 420605 2/19/2013 021993 STUIVENGA, LARRY & SHIRLEY 008054 UTILITY REFUND - 1908 19TH PL SE 430.233.100 88.31 Total : 88.31 420606 2/19/2013 005668 SUMNER VETERINARY HOSPITAL 012813INV K9 EXAMINATION (BODI); DOS 01/28/13 117.00.521.210.41 52.00 Total : 52.00 420607 2/19/2013 013148 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC 50624 OUTERWEAR, CARTS AND BAGS 437.00.576.680.34 1,366.46 Total : 1,366.46 420608 2/19/2013 017378 SVOBODA, GRANT 020913INV DJ DANCE SERVICE 2/9/13 LATE NIGHT 001.33.574.240.41 300.00 Total : 300.00 420609 2/19/2013 010864 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC.1770668 FILM LICENSING RIGHTS FOR SCREENING 001.33.573.201.41 696.42 Total : 696.42 67Page:CA.B Page 77 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 68 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420610 2/19/2013 021922 SYBIS LLC 0061 24 Cyberlock spare keys and accessories 430.00.534.800.35 3,649.97 Sales Tax 430.00.534.800.35 346.75 Total : 3,996.72 420611 2/19/2013 290270 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 15166781 SHOP SUPPLIES FOR GOLF MAINT. 437.00.576.600.31 77.08 Total : 77.08 420612 2/19/2013 021497 TAPP, NANCY REBATE WATER UTILITY TOILET REBATE PROGRAM 430.00.534.100.41 100.00 Total : 100.00 420613 2/19/2013 222370 THE LOCK SHOP 83269 Extras Keys~ 505.00.524.500.31 19.60 83392 Duplicate Keys - Cemetary~ 505.00.524.500.31 9.80 83407 Duplicate Keys - Cemetary~ 505.00.524.500.31 9.80 Total : 39.20 420614 2/19/2013 012331 FOOTJOY 4764939 RESALE OF CLOTHING, SHOES, GLOVES, 437.00.576.680.34 154.07 4774351 RESALE OF CLOTHING, SHOES, GLOVES, 437.00.576.680.34 903.18 Total : 1,057.25 420615 2/19/2013 000554 TOTEM ELECTRIC OF TACOMA INC 44101 68Page:CA.B Page 78 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 69 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420615 2/19/2013 (Continued)000554 TOTEM ELECTRIC OF TACOMA INC Totem Electric Inc replaced burnt out 430.00.534.800.48 260.84 Sales Tax 430.00.534.800.48 24.78 Total : 285.62 420616 2/19/2013 015041 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS INC 1673 Site work at Main St & Division 518.00.518.880.64 4,672.00 1685 Install and wire Light Pole at 132nd 001.42.542.300.41 1,196.00 Total : 5,868.00 420617 2/19/2013 370220 U S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 42748 2013 MEMBERSHIP - US CONF MAYORS 001.11.513.100.49 5,269.00 Total : 5,269.00 420618 2/19/2013 004753 U.S. IDENTIFICATION MANUAL 628024 2013 I.D. Checking Guide Invoice 001.15.514.300.49 28.95 Total : 28.95 420619 2/19/2013 013834 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 0865164 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 436.00.536.200.49 57.28 ADDL USE TAX 436.00.536.200.49 0.05 ADDL USE TAX 436.237.200 -0.05 Total : 57.28 420620 2/19/2013 370900 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 4799F2043 Shipping services with UPS 69Page:CA.B Page 79 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 70 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420620 2/19/2013 (Continued)370900 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 518.00.518.780.42 28.84 4799F2053 Shipping services with UPS 518.00.518.780.42 30.14 890192043 Shipping services with UPS 518.00.518.780.42 32.63 890192053 Shipping services with UPS 518.00.518.780.42 37.76 Total : 129.37 420621 2/19/2013 370905 UNITED RENTALS INC 108418398-001 Skyjack 19 ft Scissor Rental~ 505.00.524.500.35 402.80 Total : 402.80 420622 2/19/2013 021794 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL 90146355 United States Geological Survey invoice 430.00.534.100.41 3,750.00 Total : 3,750.00 420623 2/19/2013 021989 UNITED WESTERN SUPPLY IN092099 50 LB STARBLAST BAG 001.33.576.100.31 110.00 Sales Tax 001.33.576.100.31 10.45 Total : 120.45 420624 2/19/2013 021672 US BANK 24223693023980019770 WSRA CONF SPONSOR - RECYCLED FASHION 434.00.537.100.49 250.00 24323002362123626010 POSTERS FOR SUSTAINABILITY MOVIE NIGHT 434.00.537.120.42 78.84 70Page:CA.B Page 80 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 71 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420624 2/19/2013 (Continued)021672 US BANK 24431063009026837354 2013 DUES FOR SHELLEY, MARTIN, RHONDA, 001.14.514.100.49 50.00 2013 DUES FOR SHELLEY, MARTIN, RHONDA, 001.14.514.230.49 250.00 24445743001100278938 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 220.16 24445743011100251059 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 77.90 24445743012100270904 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 21.24 24445743012100270928 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 5.27 24445743017100234337 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 124.61 24445743017100234993 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001.14.514.230.31 222.23 24492152366849124194 2013 MEMBERSHIP FOR JOAN & KAHTLEEN 434.00.537.100.49 75.00 24692163004000264890 DEC 2012 ADVERTISING FOR CEMETERY 436.00.536.200.44 194.26 24692163011000299645 RECYLCLING ADS IN AUBURN REPORTER~ 432.00.535.100.41 179.62 RECYLCLING ADS IN AUBURN REPORTER~ 430.00.534.100.41 179.63 RECYLCLING ADS IN AUBURN REPORTER~ 71Page:CA.B Page 81 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 72 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420624 2/19/2013 (Continued)021672 US BANK 434.00.537.120.44 2,232.75 24733092362200931600 ADDICTED TO PLASTIC DVD RENTAL FOR 432.00.535.100.41 51.00 ADDICTED TO PLASTIC DVD RENTAL FOR 430.00.534.100.41 51.00 Total : 4,263.51 420625 2/19/2013 021980 USHING, TOM 011913REIMB REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK BOOTS PURSHASED 001.17.524.200.22 120.44 Total : 120.44 420626 2/19/2013 371410 UTILITIES SERVICE CO. INC 8377 REPAIR OF STORM PUMP STATIONS ON AN AS 432.00.535.900.48 2,290.87 8396 REPAIR OF SEWER PUMP STATIONS BY 431.00.535.800.48 2,497.34 Total : 4,788.21 420627 2/19/2013 016735 UTILITY SERVICES ASSOC, LLC 124061b LEAK DETECTION SERVICES ON AN AS 430.00.534.800.41 450.00 Total : 450.00 420628 2/19/2013 380240 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 0013714 NOV/DEC 2012 LANGUAGE LINE 001.21.521.100.42 239.42 0013737 JANUARY 2013 - 800 MHz RADIOS 001.21.521.100.42 5,751.13 Total : 5,990.55 420629 2/19/2013 015073 VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY DEC2012 DEC 2012 PERMIT & PLAN REVIEW FEES 72Page:CA.B Page 82 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 73 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420629 2/19/2013 (Continued)015073 VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 651.237.360 5,543.69 JAN2013 JAN 2013 PERMIT & PLAN REVIEW FEES 651.237.360 10,782.59 Total : 16,326.28 420630 2/19/2013 380500 VAN, KEVIN 020413REIMB BAKING SODA FOR ELECTRIC GOLF CART 437.00.576.680.31 79.08 Total : 79.08 420631 2/19/2013 380660 VANDVER, RUSS 012213LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.220.25 34.98 012513LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.220.25 19.00 012513LEOFF LEOFF 1 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT APPROVED 001.98.522.220.25 360.00 Total : 413.98 420632 2/19/2013 111800 VERIZON WIRELESS 1158467506 Verizon Cell Phones for Jan 2013~ 001.11.511.600.42 385.12 Mayor Cell Phones 001.11.513.100.42 278.11 HR Cell phones 001.13.516.100.42 275.28 Finance Cell Phones 001.14.514.230.42 165.06 Planning (Bill Thomas) Cell Phone 001.17.562.100.42 55.02 Storm Cell Phones 432.00.535.900.42 317.78 73Page:CA.B Page 83 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 74 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420632 2/19/2013 (Continued)111800 VERIZON WIRELESS Finance Cell phone 434.00.537.100.42 18.24 Cemetery Cell Phone 436.00.536.100.42 35.10 Golf Cell Phone 437.00.576.600.42 18.24 Facilities Cell Phones 505.00.524.500.42 242.09 IT Cell Phones 518.00.518.880.42 667.33 Multimedia Cell phone 518.00.518.780.42 55.02 Equipment Rental Cell phones 550.00.548.100.42 70.20 PD Cell Phones 117.00.521.210.42 539.37 Finance Cell Phone 430.00.534.800.42 18.24 Water Cell Phones 430.00.534.800.42 805.35 Sewer Cell Phones 431.00.535.800.42 382.08 Legal Cell Phones 001.15.515.100.42 164.76 Planning Cell Phones 001.17.524.200.42 199.32 Community Services Cell Phones 001.17.557.200.42 110.04 Planning Cell Phones 001.17.558.100.42 439.86 PD Cell Phones 001.21.521.100.42 4,126.96 PD Cell Phones 001.21.521.210.42 731.68 74Page:CA.B Page 84 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 75 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420632 2/19/2013 (Continued)111800 VERIZON WIRELESS Emergency Management Cell Phones 001.32.525.100.42 73.26 Engineering Cell Phones 001.32.532.200.42 552.56 Farmers Market Cell Phone 001.33.573.901.42 55.02 Parks Admin cell phone 001.33.574.100.42 55.02 Senior Center Cell Phones 001.33.574.210.42 53.34 Parks Cell Phones 001.33.574.220.42 372.00 Museum Cell Phones 001.33.575.300.42 53.34 Parks Maintenance cell phones 001.33.576.100.42 308.70 Street Cell Phones 001.42.543.100.42 383.47 SOS Cell Phone 103.00.595.100.42 18.24 Total : 12,025.20 420633 2/19/2013 380930 VOLSTAD, DALE 012413LEOFF LEOFF 1 PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM 001.98.522.210.25 269.45 Total : 269.45 420634 2/19/2013 171890 W. W. GRAINGER, INC 9044676386 SMALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ON 550.141.300 64.90 9045001394 SMALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ON 001.32.532.200.31 30.75 9050742007 Misc Facilities Supplies - Grainger 75Page:CA.B Page 85 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 76 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420634 2/19/2013 (Continued)171890 W. W. GRAINGER, INC 505.00.524.500.31 137.88 Total : 233.53 420635 2/19/2013 016171 WA OFFICE OF SEC OF STATE 00002268 ARCHIVES BOXES FROM REGIONAL STATE 001.15.514.300.31 125.38 Total : 125.38 420636 2/19/2013 391470 WA STATE CRIM JUSTICE TRAINING 2013-1763 PRE-SUPERVISOR TRAINING 01/07/13 to 001.21.521.300.49 200.00 Total : 200.00 420637 2/19/2013 321620 WA STATE DEPT ECOLOGY 2013-WAR045502 Annual Storm Water Permit Fees~ 432.00.535.100.51 8,879.65 Total : 8,879.65 420638 2/19/2013 392100 WA STATE EMP SECURITY DEPT 945048-10 4 4TH QTR 2012 WA UNEMPLOYMENT TAX ~ 501.00.517.700.28 77,215.87 Total : 77,215.87 420639 2/19/2013 020828 WALES, LARGO 012413REIMB MILEAGE TO MTGS 1/02/13-1/24/13 001.11.511.600.43 99.44 Total : 99.44 420640 2/19/2013 392520 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I13005640 BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE MONTH OF 001.13.516.100.49 110.00 I13005641 BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE MONTH OF 001.13.516.100.49 210.00 Total : 320.00 76Page:CA.B Page 86 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 77 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420641 2/19/2013 292460 WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 2012 SEIZED FUNDS CREDIT ON ACCOUNT FROM 2010 117.00.521.210.49 -0.30 10% OF COA 2012 ADJUDICATED SEIZURE 117.237.300 3,806.46 Total : 3,806.16 420642 2/19/2013 019123 WASHINGTON TRACTOR INC 124441 EQUIPMENT PARTS 436.00.536.200.31 51.47 Total : 51.47 420643 2/19/2013 006740 WASHINGTON2 ADVOCATES, LLC 4326 WA Advocates consulting services - 001.98.513.100.41 15,000.00 Total : 15,000.00 420644 2/19/2013 270540 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WA, INC JAN2013 Waste Mgmt Solid Waste Services January 434.00.537.800.41 839,294.17 Total : 839,294.17 420645 2/19/2013 393570 WATER MANAGEMENT LABS, INC 117954 WATER ANALYSIS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 430.00.534.800.41 189.00 117985 WATER ANALYSIS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 430.00.534.800.41 336.00 118055 WATER ANALYSIS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 432.00.535.100.41 825.00 118127 WATER ANALYSIS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 430.00.534.800.41 315.00 118176 WATER ANALYSIS ON AN AS REQUIRED BASIS 77Page:CA.B Page 87 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 78 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420645 2/19/2013 (Continued)393570 WATER MANAGEMENT LABS, INC 430.00.534.800.41 189.00 Total : 1,854.00 420646 2/19/2013 022002 WATTS, CASEY & LINDA 060027 UTILITY REFUND - 11838 SE 290TH PL 430.233.100 119.07 Total : 119.07 420647 2/19/2013 016350 WCI 130311685 Long Distance for January 2013 518.00.518.880.42 562.61 Total : 562.61 420648 2/19/2013 004433 WEBB, DONALD 011113LEOFF LEOFF 1 DENTAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.98.517.210.25 125.00 Total : 125.00 420649 2/19/2013 018105 WEBCHECK INC.4571 Webcheck Utility Escrow Estimate 430.00.534.110.41 202.50 Webcheck Utility Escrow Estimate 431.00.535.110.41 202.50 Webcheck Utility Escrow Estimate 432.00.535.910.41 202.50 Webcheck Utility Escrow Estimate 434.00.537.110.41 202.50 Total : 810.00 420650 2/19/2013 324050 WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS 21265 RADAR SYSTEM CALIBRATION - XE09417 - 001.21.521.200.48 87.60 Total : 87.60 420651 2/19/2013 394200 WEST COAST PAPER 7857861 Paper for citywide use (colored paper) 78Page:CA.B Page 88 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 79 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420651 2/19/2013 (Continued)394200 WEST COAST PAPER 518.00.518.780.31 190.81 7859893 Paper for citywide use (colored paper) 518.00.518.780.31 201.14 7867719 Paper for citywide use (colored paper) 518.00.518.780.31 234.46 Total : 626.41 420652 2/19/2013 394560 WESTERN SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC 104200-1 LOCKS FOR SEWER FACILITIES~ 431.00.535.800.35 298.80 freight 431.00.535.800.35 13.02 Sales Tax 431.00.535.800.35 29.62 104201-1 LOCKS FOR STORM FACILITIES~ 432.00.535.900.35 149.40 Sales Tax 432.00.535.900.35 15.00 freight 432.00.535.900.35 8.50 Total : 514.34 420653 2/19/2013 394800 WESTERN WA WRESTLING OFFICIALS 44 OFFICIALS (WRESTLING) FOR YOUTH DOUBLE 001.33.574.240.41 189.76 Total : 189.76 420654 2/19/2013 395160 WHITE KNIGHT SAFE & LOCK, INC 25252 KEYS, LOCKS AND LOCKSMITH SERVICES ON 430.00.534.800.31 49.28 39711 KEYS AND SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT. 79Page:CA.B Page 89 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 80 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420654 2/19/2013 (Continued)395160 WHITE KNIGHT SAFE & LOCK, INC 001.33.576.100.31 25.18 F25264 Sales Tax 430.00.534.800.41 43.32 Replace broken dead bolt at Academy PS, 430.00.534.800.41 456.05 F25265 Install new lock set that accepts 430.00.534.800.35 307.00 Sales Tax 430.00.534.800.35 29.17 Total : 910.00 420655 2/19/2013 014096 WHITE RIVER FENCE CO 012913/A REPAIR ROCK/ROPE CLIMBER AT GAME FARM 001.33.576.100.48 438.00 012913INV INSTALLING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT; SUMMIT 001.33.576.100.31 2,463.75 Total : 2,901.75 420656 2/19/2013 395580 WILBUR-ELLIS, CO 6574648 WINTER CHEMICALS/FERTILIZERS 437.00.576.600.31 919.80 6841576 PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZERS FOR PARKS 001.33.576.100.31 309.85 6841595 PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZERS FOR PARKS 001.33.576.100.31 32.20 6849110 50 LB BAG OF APEX 001.33.576.100.31 57.49 Total : 1,319.34 80Page:CA.B Page 90 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 81 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 420657 2/19/2013 012288 WILEY, DEBORAH 1576275 PARKS REFUND 001.347.699 19.20 Total : 19.20 420658 2/19/2013 017788 WILLIS, MARGIE K.38046 ZUMBA CLASSES:~ 001.33.574.210.41 176.00 38049 ZUMBA CLASSES:~ 001.33.574.210.41 112.00 38052 ZUMBA CLASSES:~ 001.33.574.210.41 16.00 Total : 304.00 420659 2/19/2013 005101 WOOD, COREEN 065759 UTILITY REFUND - 11211 SE 316TH PL 430.233.100 174.97 Total : 174.97 420660 2/19/2013 013677 YESCO TB51775 Readerboard Repairs at Auburn Ave~ 505.00.524.500.48 417.91 Total : 417.91 420661 2/19/2013 022009 YOUNG, MICHELLE 1576273 PARKS REFUND 001.347.699 15.00 1576274 PARKS REFUND 001.347.699 8.00 Total : 23.00 420662 2/19/2013 002368 ZARAN SAYRE & ASSOCIATES 005681 UTILITY REFUND - 1257 29TH ST SE 430.233.100 55.79 81Page:CA.B Page 91 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 82 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 55.79 420662 2/19/2013 002368 002368 ZARAN SAYRE & ASSOCIATES 420663 2/19/2013 021992 ZEHNER, GERALD & GWENLYN 006452 UTILITY REFUND - 3404 R ST SE 430.233.100 110.78 Total : 110.78 420664 2/19/2013 020592 ZOHO CORPORATION 2037580 Annual Subscription for AD Manager~ 518.00.518.880.48 806.00 Total : 806.00 Bank total : 4,309,850.92 309 Vouchers for bank code :000 4,309,850.92Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 309 82Page:CA.B Page 92 of 339 02/13/2013 Voucher List City of Auburn 83 1:55:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :000 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE GOODS AND/ OR SERVICES CHARGED ON THE VOUCHERS LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN FURNISHED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THE CLAIMS HEREIN TO BE VALID AND CORRECT. ____________________________ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE WE, THE UNDERSIGNED FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE AUBURN CITY COUNCIL, AUBURN WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT VOUCHER #420355 THROUGH VOUCHER #420664 IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,309,850.92 ARE APPROVED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013. ______________________ CHAIR _______________________ MEMBER ________________________ MEMBER 83Page:CA.B Page 93 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Payroll Vouchers Date: February 11, 2013 Department: Administration Attachments: No Attachments Available Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Approve the payroll vouchers as part of the Consent Agenda. Background Summary: Payroll check numbers 533602 through 533631 in the amount of $843,431.35 and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,190,039.16 for a grand total of $2,033,470.51. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:CA.C AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.C Page 94 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Bad Debt Write Off - Parks, Arts & Recreation Date: February 7, 2013 Department: Parks/Art and Recreation Attachments: Bad Debt Write Off Summary Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: City Council approve the write off of outstanding Parks, Arts & Recreation accounts in the amount of $3,641.00. Background Summary: The Parks, Arts & Recreation Department staff has reviewed the aged receivable balances for department programs and facility rentals for the period of 2002 through 2011. Bad debt for that 10 year period of time represents approximately .00045 of annual revenue. The Parks, Arts & Recreation Department staff is recommending that the outstanding account balances (Exhibit A)that have been deemed uncollectible, be written off. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Municipal Services Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Faber Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:CA.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.D Page 95 of 339 2002 - 2011 Write off Summary Exhibit A Facility Fees $1,872 Program Fees 1,388 NSF and Bank Fees 381 Total $3,641 CA.D Page 96 of 339 CA.D Page 97 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6451 Date: February 5, 2013 Department: Finance Attachments: Ordinance No. 6451 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: City Council to adopt Ordinance No. 6451. Background Summary: An ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to the combined utility systems of the City; providing for the issuance of one or more series of utility system revenue bonds of the City in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000.00 (1) to pay a portion of the cost of certain improvements described herein, (2) to make a deposit to the debt service reserve account, and (3) to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:ORD.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.A Page 98 of 339 51267762.3 CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 6451 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to the combined utility systems of the City; providing for the issuance of one or more series of utility system revenue bonds of the City in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000.00 (1) to pay a portion of the cost of certain improvements described herein, (2) to make a deposit to the debt service reserve account, and (3) to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City’s designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters. PASSED FEBRUARY 19, 2013 Prepared by Foster Pepper PLLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 447-4400 ORD.A Page 99 of 339 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Definitions ................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2. Recitals and Findings ................................................................................................. 7 Section 3. Authorization of the Bonds ........................................................................................ 8 Section 4. Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative .................... 8 Section 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds................................................. 9 Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds ................................................................................. 10 Section 7. Payment of Bonds .................................................................................................... 10 Section 8. Redemption Provisions and Open Market Purchase of Bonds ................................ 11 Section 9. Failure to Pay Bonds ................................................................................................ 12 Section 10. The Bond Fund; Payments into Bond Fund ............................................................ 12 Section 11. Rate Stabilization Fund ............................................................................................ 13 Section 12. Pledge of Revenue and Lien Position ...................................................................... 14 Section 13. Deposit of Bond Proceeds........................................................................................ 14 Section 14. Covenants................................................................................................................. 14 Section 15. Flow of Funds. ......................................................................................................... 17 Section 16. Provisions for Future Parity Bonds .......................................................................... 17 Section 17. Separate Utility Systems .......................................................................................... 18 Section 18. Contract Resource Obligations ................................................................................ 18 Section 19. Tax Covenants ......................................................................................................... 19 Section 20. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds ................................................................... 19 Section 21. Sale and Delivery of the Bonds ............................................................................... 20 Section 22. Official Statement .................................................................................................... 20 Section 23. Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure ....................................................... 21 Section 24. Supplemental or Amendatory Ordinances ............................................................... 23 Section 25. Defaults and Remedies ............................................................................................ 25 Section 26. Ratification............................................................................................................... 29 Section 27. Effective Date of Ordinance .................................................................................... 29 Exhibit A – Description of the Improvements Exhibit B – Parity Conditions ORD.A Page 100 of 339 CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 6451 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to the combined utility systems of the City; providing for the issuance of one or more series of utility system revenue bonds of the City in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000.00 (1) to pay a portion of the cost of certain improvements described herein, (2) to make a deposit to the debt service reserve account, and (3) to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City’s designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following words shall have the following meanings: (a) “2005 Bonds” means the outstanding Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2005, of the City issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 5930. (b) “2010A Bonds” means the outstanding Utility System Revenue Bonds, 2010A, of the City issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 6335. (c) “2010B Bonds” means the outstanding Utility System Revenue Bonds, 2010B (Taxable Build America Bonds – Direct Payment), of the City issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 6335. (d) “Alternate Security” means any bond insurance, reserve insurance, collateral, security, letter of credit, guaranty, surety bond or similar credit enhancement device providing for or securing the payment of all or part of the principal of and interest on Parity Bonds, which: (i) is non-cancelable, and (ii) is issued by an institution which has been assigned, at the time of issuance of the particular issue of Parity Bonds in connection with which the Alternate Security is acquired, a credit rating equal to or better than the highest two rating categories by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poor's (without regard to gradations with in those categories). Alternate Security includes, in lieu of cash and investments, such a security obtained by the City for the purpose of satisfying part or all of the Reserve Requirement for the Parity Bonds then outstanding. (e) “Annual Debt Service” means for any calendar year for the Parity Bonds (or for any series thereof, as applicable), all the interest, plus all principal (except principal of Term Bonds due in any Term Bond Maturity Year), plus all mandatory redemption and sinking fund installments for that year, less all bond interest payable from the proceeds of any such Parity Bonds in that year. (f) “Assessment Bonds” shall mean the original principal amount of any issue of Parity Bonds equal to the total principal amount (or, if refunding bonds, the remaining unpaid ORD.A Page 101 of 339 -2- principal amount) of ULID Assessments on any final assessment roll or rolls of one or more ULIDs formed in connection with the improvements being financed by such issue of bonds (or bonds being refunded). The original principal amount of such issue of bonds in excess of Assessment Bonds shall be referred to as “bonds (or Bonds) that are not Assessment Bonds.” Assessment Bonds shall be allocated to each $5,000.00 of bonds in proportion to their percentage of the entire issue of bonds. When a bond of any issue of bonds containing Assessment Bonds is redeemed or purchased, and retired, the same percentage of that bond as the percentage of Assessment Bonds is to the total issue of those bonds shall be treated as Assessment Bonds being redeemed or purchased and retired. (g) “Authorized Denomination” means $5,000.00 or any integral multiple thereof within a maturity. (h) “Average Annual Debt Service” means, as of its date of calculation, the sum of the Annual Debt Service for the remaining calendar years to the last scheduled maturity of the applicable issue or issues of bonds divided by the number of those years. For purposes of computing the Reserve Requirement the estimated amount of bonds to be redeemed prior to maturity may be taken into account if required under federal arbitrage regulations. (i) “Beneficial Owner” means, with respect to a Bond, the owner of any beneficial interest in that Bond. (j) “Bond Counsel” means the firm of Foster Pepper PLLC, its successor, or any other attorney or firm of attorneys selected by the City with a nationally recognized standing as bond counsel in the field of municipal finance. (k) “Bond Fund” means that special fund of the City known as the Utility System Revenue Bond Fund created by Section 10 of Ordinance No. 4945 for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Parity Bonds. (l) “Bond Purchase Agreement” means an offer to purchase the Bonds, or a Series of Bonds, setting forth certain terms and conditions of the issuance, sale and delivery of that Series of the Bonds, which offer is authorized to be accepted by the Designated Representative on behalf of the City, if consistent with this ordinance. (m) “Bond Register” means the books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar for the purpose of identifying ownership of the Bonds. (n) “Bond Registrar” means the Fiscal Agent, or any successor bond registrar selected by the City. (o) “Bonds” means the bonds of the City issued pursuant to and for the purposes provided in this ordinance in one or more series and with such additional series and other designation as the Designated Representative may deem appropriate. (p) “City” means the City of Auburn, Washington, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. (q) “City Council” means the legislative authority of the City, as duly and regularly constituted from time to time. (r) “Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. ORD.A Page 102 of 339 -3- (s) “Construction Accounts” means such accounts created in such System Funds as the Finance Director shall designate for the purpose of paying the costs of the Improvements and the costs of issuance of the Bonds. (t) “Contract Resource Obligation” means an obligation of the City, designated as a Contract Resource Obligation and entered into pursuant to Section 18 of this ordinance, to make payments for water supply, sewer service, water, sewage or stormwater transmission or other commodity or service to another person or entity (including without limitation a separate utility system created pursuant to Section 17 of this ordinance and Section 18 of Ordinance No. 4945). (u) “Coverage Requirement” in any calendar year means an amount of Net Revenue at least equal to 1.25 times the Annual Debt Service in that year on all Parity Bonds that are not Assessment Bonds. Upon redemption or defeasance of all outstanding 2005 Bonds, the following sentence shall be added: If any Assessment Bonds are outstanding, the Coverage Requirement shall also mean, in any calendar year, an amount of ULID Assessments at least equal to 1.0 times the Annual Debt Service in that year on all Parity Bonds that are Assessment Bonds. (v) “DTC” means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, or its nominee. (w) “Designated Representative” means the officer of the City appointed in Section 4 of this ordinance to serve as the City’s designated representative in accordance with RCW 39.46.040(2). (x) “Final Terms” means the terms and conditions for the sale of a Series of Bonds including, but not limited to the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or rates (or mechanism for determining interest rate or rates), payment dates, final maturity, redemption rights, price, and other terms or covenants. (y) “Finance Director” means the City Finance Director or the officer that is the successor to substantially the functions and duties of the Finance Director. (z) “Fiscal Agent” means the fiscal agent of the State, as the same may be designated by the State from time to time. (aa) “Future Parity Bonds” means any and all utility system revenue bonds of the City issued after the date of the issuance of the Bonds, the payment of the principal of and interest on which constitutes a charge or lien on the Net Revenue and ULID Assessments equal in rank with the charge and lien upon such revenue and assessments required to be paid into the Bond Fund to pay and secure the payment of the principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Bonds. (bb) “Government Obligations” has the meaning given in RCW 39.53.010, as now in effect or as may hereafter be amended. (cc) “Gross Revenue of the System” or “Gross Revenue” means all of the earnings and revenues received by the City from the maintenance and operation of the System and all earnings from the investment of money in the Bond Fund which earnings are deposited in the Principal and Interest Account, and connection and capital improvement charges collected for the purpose of defraying the costs of capital facilities of the System. Gross Revenue includes any Tax Credit Subsidy Payments received by the City in respect of any Parity Bonds. Gross Revenue shall not include: ULID Assessments, government grants, proceeds from the sale of ORD.A Page 103 of 339 -4- System property, City taxes collected by or through the System, principal proceeds of bonds or other obligations and earnings or proceeds from any investments in a trust, defeasance or escrow fund created to defease or refund System obligations (until commingled with other earnings and revenues of the System) or held in a special account for the purpose of paying a rebate to the United States Government under the Code, on earnings of a separate utility system that may be created under Section 17 of this ordinance. (dd) “Improvements” means those improvements in the City’s Plan of Additions that are described in Exhibit A to this ordinance, which is incorporated by reference. (ee) “Independent Utility Consultant” means either (1) an independent licensed professional engineer experienced in the design, construction or operation of municipal utilities of comparable size and character to the System, or (2) an independent certified public accountant or other professional consultant experienced in the development of rates and charges for municipal utilities of comparable size and character to the System. (ff) “Issue Date” means, with respect to any Series of Bonds, the date of initial issuance and delivery of such Series to the Underwriter in exchange for the purchase price of such Series. (gg) “Letter of Representations” means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations dated February 18, 1997, between the City and DTC, as it may be amended from time to time, and any successor or substitute letter relating to the operational procedures of the Securities Depository. (hh) “MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. (ii) “Maintenance and Operation Expense” means all reasonable expenses incurred by the City in causing the System to be operated and maintained in good repair, working order and condition, including without limitation payments made to any other municipal corporation or private entity as Contract Resource Obligations, and payments with respect to any other expenses of the System that are properly treated as maintenance and operation expenses under generally accepted accounting principles applicable to municipal corporations. The term Maintenance and Operation Expense does not include any depreciation or capital additions or capital replacements to the System. (jj) “Maximum Annual Debt Service” means at the time of calculation, the maximum amount of Annual Debt Service that will mature or come due in the current calendar year or any future year on the outstanding Parity Bonds. (kk) “Net Revenue of the System” or “Net Revenue” means the Gross Revenue: (a) less (1) Maintenance and Operation Expense and (2) deposits into the Rate Stabilization Fund; and (b) plus withdrawals from the Rate Stabilization Fund. (ll) “Outstanding Parity Bonds” means the 2005 Bonds, the 2010A Bonds and the 2010B Bonds. (mm) “Owner” means, without distinction, the Registered Owner and the Beneficial Owner. (nn) “Parity Bonds” means the Outstanding Parity Bonds, the Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds. ORD.A Page 104 of 339 -5- (oo) “Parity Conditions” means those conditions for the issuance of Future Parity Bonds, which were originally set forth in Section 17 of Ordinance No. 5930, as such conditions are now set forth in Exhibit B, attached to this ordinance and incorporated by this reference. (pp) “Plan of Additions” means the system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the Combined Utility specified, adopted and ordered to be carried out by the water system, sewer system, and storm drainage system Capital Facilities Plans of the City adopted and updated in connection with to the City’s Comprehensive Plan for each system, as most recently amended and updated by Ordinance No. 6440, adopted on December 17, 2012. (qq) “Principal and Interest Account” means the account of that name created in the Bond Fund for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Parity Bonds. (rr) “Rate Stabilization Fund” means the Utility System Rate Stabilization Fund created in Section 11 of Ordinance No. 4945. (ss) “Rating Agency” means any nationally recognized rating agency then maintaining a rating on the Bonds at the request of the City. (tt) “Record Date” means the Bond Registrar’s close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding an interest payment date. With respect to redemption of a Bond prior to its maturity, the Record Date shall mean the Bond Registrar’s close of business on the date on which the Bond Registrar sends the notice of redemption in accordance with Section 8. (uu) “Registered Owner” means, with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name that Bond is registered on the Bond Register. For so long as the City utilizes the book–entry system for the Bonds under the Letter of Representations, Registered Owner shall mean the Securities Depository. (vv) “Reserve Account” means the account of that name created in the Bond Fund for the purpose of securing the payment of the principal of and interest on the Parity Bonds. (ww) “Reserve Requirement” means, for all Parity Bonds, the lesser of (i) Maximum Annual Debt Service on those bonds or (ii) 125% of Average Annual Debt Service on those bonds, but at no time shall the Reserve Requirement exceed 10% of the proceeds of those bonds. Variable Interest Rate Bonds shall be assumed to bear interest at a fixed rate equal to the higher of (1) the highest variable rate borne during the preceding 24 months by any outstanding variable rate revenue bonds of the System or, (2) if no such Variable Interest Rate Bonds are outstanding at the time of calculation, the rate borne by other variable rate debt the interest rate for which is determined by reference to an index comparable to the index to be used to determine the interest rate on the Future Parity Bonds proposed to be issued. Notwithstanding the above, the deposit to be made in the Reserve Account shall be decreased for any issue of Parity Bonds when and to the extent that the City provides for an Alternate Security to be deposited into the Reserve Account to secure the payment of the principal of and interest on that issue of bonds. The amount payable under any Alternate Security shall be credited against the amount otherwise required to be made into the Reserve Account to meet the Reserve Requirement for that issue of bonds. When calculating the Reserve Requirement with reference to any year in which Tax Credit Subsidy Bonds are outstanding, the City shall exclude the amount of Tax Credit Subsidy Payment that the City is then eligible to receive from Annual Debt Service. (xx) “Rule 15c2-12” means Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. ORD.A Page 105 of 339 -6- (yy) “SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (zz) “Securities Depository” means DTC, any successor thereto, any substitute securities depository selected by the City, or the nominee of any of the foregoing. Any Securities Depository must be qualified under applicable laws and regulations to provide the services proposed to be provided by it. (aaa) “Series of Bonds” or “Series” means a series of Bonds issued pursuant to this ordinance. (bbb) “State” means the State of Washington. (ccc) “System” or “Utility System” means the City’s existing combined water supply and distribution system, sanitary sewage system, storm and surface water utility, together with all additions thereto and betterments and extensions thereof at any time made or constructed, and shall include any utility systems hereafter combined with the System. The System shall not include any additional systems for water supply, sewer service, water, sewage or stormwater transmission, treatment or other commodity or service that may be created, acquired or constructed by the City as a separate utility system as provided in Section 11 of Ordinance No. 4945 and Section 17 of this ordinance. (ddd) “System Funds” means, collectively, the Water Fund, Sewer Fund and Storm Drainage Fund including without limitation any Construction Accounts or other accounts or subaccount created thereon. (eee) “System of Registration” means the system of registration for the City’s bonds and other obligations set forth in Ordinance No. 3905 of the City. (fff) “Tax Credit Subsidy Bond” means any bond that is designated by the City as a “build America bond” or other tax credit bond, pursuant to the Code, and which is further designated as a “qualified bond” under Section 6431 of the Code, and with respect to which the City is eligible to receive a Tax Credit Subsidy Payment. (ggg) “Tax Credit Subsidy Payment” means the amounts which the City is entitled to receive as a tax credit payable by the United States Treasury to the City under Section 6431 of the Code, in respect of any bonds issued as Tax Credit Subsidy Bonds. (hhh) “Tax-Exempt Bonds” means any Series issued on a tax-exempt basis. (iii) “Term Bond Maturity Year” means any calendar year in which Term Bonds are scheduled to mature. (jjj) “Term Bonds” means the bonds of any single issue or series of Parity Bonds designated as such in the ordinance authorizing their issuance or sale. (kkk) “ULID” means Utility Local Improvement District. (lll) “ULID Assessments” means all assessments levied and collected in any ULID of the City created for the acquisition or construction of additions to and extensions and betterments of the System if such assessments are pledged to be paid into the Bond Fund (less any prepaid assessments paid or to be paid into a construction fund or account). ULID Assessments shall include installments thereof and any interest or penalties that may be due thereon. ORD.A Page 106 of 339 -7- (mmm) “Undertaking” means the undertaking to provide continuing disclosure entered into pursuant to Section 23 of this ordinance. (nnn) “Underwriter” means Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation of Seattle, Washington, or such other purchaser of the Bonds whose offer is accepted by the Designated Representative in accordance with this ordinance. (ooo) “Variable Interest Rate” means a variable interest rate or rates to be borne by a series of Future Parity Bonds or any one or more maturities within a series of Future Parity Bonds. The method of computing such a variable interest rate shall be specified in the ordinance authorizing such Future Parity Bonds, which ordinance also shall specify either (i) the particular period or periods of time or manner of determining such period or periods of time for which each value of such variable interest rate shall remain in effect or (ii) the time or times upon which any change in such variable interest rate shall become effective. (ppp) “Variable Interest Rate Bonds” means, for any period of time, Future Parity Bonds which bear a Variable Interest Rate during that period, except that Future Parity Bonds the interest rate or rates on which shall have been fixed for the remainder of the term thereof no longer shall be deemed to be Variable Interest Rate Bonds. Section 2. Recitals and Findings. The City Council makes the following findings and determinations: (a) Background. The City now owns, operates and maintains a water supply and distribution system and a sanitary sewage system, which systems were combined pursuant to RCW 35.67.320 by Ordinance No. 961, passed and approved March 7, 1950, and further combined with the storm drainage system by Ordinance No. 4945, passed February 18, 1997. The combined systems, including all additions, betterments and extensions at any time made, are collectively referred to as “Combined Utility System of the City” or the “System.” (b) Plan of Additions. The City has adopted the Plan of Additions and is now in need of funds with which to finance the Improvements, which comprise a portion of the Plan of Additions, the estimated cost of which is more than $47,519,250.00 and the City does not have available sufficient funds to pay the costs. (c) Outstanding Parity Bonds. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 5930, the City issued its $2,765,000.00 aggregate principal amount 2005 Bonds, and reserved the right to issue additional utility system revenue bonds which would constitute a lien and charge upon the gross revenues of the Combined Utility System on a parity with those bonds if the Parity Conditions are met. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 6335, the City issued its $6,790,000.00 aggregate principal amount 2010A Bonds and its $14,505,000.00 aggregate principal amount 2010B Bonds on a parity with the 2005 Bonds. (d) Parity Conditions Met. The City Council finds and declares that the amounts required to have been paid into the Bond Fund for the Outstanding Parity Bonds have been paid and maintained as required therein, and that all other Parity Conditions for the issuance of the Bonds as Future Parity Bonds will have been met and satisfied before the Bonds are delivered to the original purchaser thereof. (e) Sufficiency of Gross Revenue. The City Council finds and determines that the Gross Revenue and benefits to be derived from the operation and maintenance of the System at the rates to be charged for services from the System will be more than sufficient to meet all ORD.A Page 107 of 339 -8- Maintenance and Operation Expense and to permit the setting aside into the Bond Fund out of the Gross Revenue of amounts sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Bonds when due. The City Council declares that in fixing the amounts to be paid into the Bond Fund under this ordinance it has exercised due regard for Maintenance and Operation Expense and has not obligated the City to set aside and pay into the Bond Fund a greater amount of Gross Revenue of the System than in its judgment will be available over and above such Maintenance and Operation Expense. (f) Issuance of Bonds. Based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to issue and sell the Bonds to the Underwriter, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement as approved by the City’s Designated Representative consistent with this ordinance. Section 3. Authorization of the Bonds. For the purpose of providing the funds necessary (a) to pay a portion of the costs of the Improvements, (b) to make a deposit to the Reserve Account and (c) to pay the cost of issuance and sale of the Bonds, the City shall issue utility system revenue bonds in one or more series in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $13,000,000.00. Section 4. Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative. The Finance Director is appointed as the City’s Designated Representative and is authorized and directed to negotiate the sale of the Bonds upon the terms deemed most advantageous to the City, and to approve the Final Terms of the Bonds, with such additional terms and covenants as she deems advisable, within the following parameters: (a) Principal Amount. The Bonds shall not exceed the aggregate principal amount of $13,000,000.00, and may be issued as either taxable or tax-exempt obligations. (b) Date or Dates. Each Series of Bonds shall be dated as of its date of delivery to the Underwriter, which date may not be later than December 31, 2013. (c) Denominations, Series Designation, etc. The Bonds must be issued in Authorized Denominations, shall be numbered separately in the manner and shall bear any name and additional designation as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Designated Representative. (d) Interest Rate(s). The Bonds shall bear interest at fixed rates per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) from their date or from the most recent interest payment date for which interest has been paid or duly provided for, whichever is later. One or more rates of interest may be fixed for the Bonds. No rate of interest for any Bond may exceed 6.00%, and the “all-in” true interest cost to the City for any Series of Bonds may not exceed 5.00%. (e) Payment Dates. Interest must be payable semiannually on each June 1 and December 1 (or such other semiannual dates as the Designated Representative deems necessary or convenient), commencing no earlier than June 1, 2013. Principal payments must be payable at maturity or in mandatory redemption installments, commencing no earlier than December 1, 2013, on such interest payment dates as are acceptable to the Designated Representative. (f) Final Maturity. The Bonds shall mature no later than 20 years following their Issue Date. ORD.A Page 108 of 339 -9- (g) Redemption Rights. In her discretion, the Designated Representative may approve in the Bond Purchase Agreement provisions for the optional and mandatory redemption of Bonds, as follows: (1) Optional Redemption. Any Bond or Series of Bonds may be designated as being (A) subject to redemption at the option of the City prior to its maturity date on the dates and at the prices set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement; or (B) not subject to redemption prior to its maturity date. If a Tax-Exempt Bond is designated as subject to optional redemption prior to its maturity, it must also be subject to such redemption on one or more dates occurring not more than 10½ years after the Issue Date. (2) Mandatory Redemption. Any Bond may be designated as a Term Bond, subject to mandatory redemption prior to its maturity on the dates and in the amounts set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement. (h) Price. The purchase price for each Series of Bonds may not be less than 98% or more than 125%% of the stated principal amount of the Series. (i) Other Terms and Conditions. The Designated Representative may determine whether it is in the City’s best interest to provide for bond insurance or other credit enhancement; and may accept such additional terms, conditions and covenants as she may determine are in the best interests of the City, consistent with this ordinance. Section 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds. (a) Registration of Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on the Bond Register. (b) Bond Registrar; Duties. The Fiscal Agent is appointed as Bond Registrar for the Bonds. The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City’s paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar’s powers and duties under this ordinance and the System of Registration. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar’s Certificate of Authentication on each Bond. The Bond Registrar may become an Owner of a Bond with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights of Beneficial Owners. (c) Bond Register; Transfer and Exchange. The Bond Register shall contain the name and mailing address of the Registered Owner of each Bond and the principal amount and number of each Bond held by each Registered Owner. A Bond surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for a Bond or Bonds in any Authorized Denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount and of the same Series, interest rate and maturity. Bonds may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer shall be without cost to the Owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange any Bond or transfer registered ownership during the period between the applicable Record Date and the next upcoming interest payment or redemption date. ORD.A Page 109 of 339 -10- (d) Securities Depository; Book-Entry Form. The Bonds initially shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC, acting as Securities Depository. Bonds so registered shall be held fully immobilized in book-entry form by DTC in accordance with the provisions of the Letter of Representations. Registered ownership of any Bond (or portion of a Bond) held in book-entry form may not be transferred except: (i) to any successor Securities Depository; (ii) to any substitute Securities Depository appointed by the City or such substitute Securities Depository’s successor; or (iii) to any person if the Bond is no longer held in book- entry form. Upon the resignation of the Securities Depository from its functions as depository, or upon a termination of the services of the Securities Depository by the City, the City may appoint a substitute Securities Depository. If (i) a Securities Depository resigns from its functions as depository, and no substitute Securities Depository can be obtained, or (ii) the City determines that a Bond is to be in certificated form, such Bond no longer shall be held in book-entry form and the ownership of such Bond may be transferred to any person as provided in this ordinance. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any obligation to participants of any Securities Depository or the persons for whom they act as nominees regarding accuracy of any records maintained by the Securities Depository or its participants. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be responsible for any notice which is permitted or required to be given to a Registered Owner except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to the Securities Depository. Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds. (a) Form of Bonds; Signatures and Seal. The Bonds shall be prepared in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and state law. The Bonds shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. If any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on a Bond ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bond bearing his or her facsimile signature is authenticated or delivered by the Bond Registrar, or issued or delivered by the City, that Bond nevertheless may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on its Issue Date. (b) Authentication. Only Bonds bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: “Certificate of Authentication. This Bond is one of the fully registered City of Auburn, Washington, Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013__.” The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. Section 7. Payment of Bonds. Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as a Bond is registered in the name of the Securities Depository, payment of principal of and interest on that Bond shall be made in the manner set forth in the Letter of Representations. If a Bond ceases to be in book- entry form, interest on that Bond shall be paid by electronic transfer on the interest payment date, ORD.A Page 110 of 339 -11- or by check or draft of the Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Bond Register as of the Record Date. However, the City is not required to make electronic transfers except pursuant to a request by a Registered Owner in writing received at least 10 days before an interest payment date and at the sole expense of the requesting Registered Owner. Principal of a Bond shall be payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bond by the Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar. The Bonds are not subject to acceleration under any circumstances. Section 8. Redemption Provisions and Open Market Purchase of Bonds. (a) Optional Redemption. The Bonds shall be subject to optional redemption acceptable to the Designated Representative, within the parameters set forth in Section 4. Any Bond that is subject to optional redemption may be selected by the City, in its sole discretion, for redemption in whole or in part at any time at which redemption is permitted as set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement. (b) Mandatory Redemption. Bonds designated as Term Bonds by the Designated Representative, within the parameters set forth in Section 4, if not previously redeemed under any optional redemption provisions, defeased or purchased and surrendered for cancellation under the provisions set forth below, shall be called for redemption at a price equal to the stated principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued interest, on the redemption dates and in the redemption amounts as set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement. If Term Bonds are redeemed under the optional redemption provisions, defeased or purchased by the City and cancelled, the principal amount of the Term Bonds so redeemed, defeased or purchased (irrespective of their actual redemption or purchase prices) shall be credited against one or more scheduled mandatory redemption amounts for those Term Bonds. The City shall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar in writing of its allocation prior to the earliest mandatory redemption date for that maturity of Term Bonds for which notice of redemption has not already been given. (c) Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. All or a portion of the principal amount of any Bond that is subject to optional or mandatory redemption may be redeemed in any Authorized Denomination. If less than all of the outstanding principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar, there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option of the Registered Owner) of the same Series, maturity and interest rate in any Authorized Denomination in the aggregate principal amount remaining unredeemed. The principal portion of any Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository which is to be partially redeemed shall be selected in accordance with the Letter of Representations. If a Bond ceases to be held in book-entry form, the portion to be partially redeemed shall be selected randomly in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine. (d) Notice of Redemption. While a Bond is registered in the name of the Securities Depository, notice of redemption shall be given as required in accordance with the Letter of Representations. If a Bond ceases to be held in book-entry form, unless waived by the Registered Owner of the Bond to be redeemed, the City shall cause notice of an intended redemption of Bonds to be given by the Bond Registrar not less than 20 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the Registered Owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address appearing on the Bond Register on the ORD.A Page 111 of 339 -12- Record Date. The requirements of the preceding sentence shall be satisfied when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by an Owner of any Bond. In addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed or sent electronically within the same period to the MSRB (if required under the Undertaking), to each Rating Agency, and to such other persons and with such additional information as the Finance Officer shall determine, but these additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of a Bond. (e) Rescission of Optional Redemption Notice. In the case of an optional redemption, the notice of redemption may state that the City retains the right to rescind the redemption notice and the optional redemption of those Bonds by giving a notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owners at any time prior to the scheduled optional redemption date. Any notice of optional redemption that is so rescinded shall be of no effect, and a Bond for which a notice of optional redemption has been rescinded shall remain outstanding. (f) Effect of Redemption. Interest on Bonds called for redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redemption, unless either the notice of redemption is rescinded as set forth above, or money sufficient to effect such redemption is not on deposit in the Bond Fund (or in an escrow account established to carry out a refunding or defeasance of the redeemed Bonds, if any). (f) Open Market Purchase. The City further reserves the right and option to purchase any or all of the Bonds in the open market at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. Section 9. Failure to Pay Bonds. If any Bond is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity date or date fixed for redemption, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or date fixed for redemption until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Bond Fund and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice of that call to the Registered Owner. Section 10. The Bond Fund; Payments into Bond Fund. (a) Payments Into the Bond Fund. The Bond Fund has previously been created in the office of the Finance Director and is divided into two accounts: the Principal and Interest Account and the Reserve Account. So long as any Bonds are outstanding, the City shall set aside and pay into the Bond Fund all ULID Assessments on their collection and, out of the Net Revenue of the System, certain fixed amounts without regard to any fixed proportion, namely: (1) Into the Principal and Interest Account on or before each interest and principal and interest payment date, an amount, together with other money on deposit therein, sufficient to pay the next ensuing interest or principal and interest payments on the Bonds; and (2) Into the Reserve Account an amount necessary to provide for the Reserve Requirement as required under the Parity Conditions. If the City fails to set aside and pay into the Bond Fund the amounts set forth above, the owner of any of the outstanding Parity Bonds may bring action against the City and compel such setting aside and payment. When the total amount in the Bond Fund equals the total amount of ORD.A Page 112 of 339 -13- principal and interest due with respect to all outstanding Parity Bonds to the last maturity thereof, no further payment need be made into the Bond Fund. (b) Application and Investment of Funds. The City may create sinking fund accounts or other accounts or subaccounts in the Bond Fund for the payment or securing the payment of Parity Bonds as long as the maintenance of such accounts does not conflict with the rights of the owners of the outstanding Parity Bonds. The City may provide for the purchase, redemption or defeasance of Parity Bonds by the use of money on deposit in any account in the Bond Fund as long as the money remaining in those accounts is sufficient to satisfy the required deposits in those accounts for the remaining Parity Bonds. All money in the Bond Fund may be kept in cash or invested in legal investments maturing not later than the date when the funds are required for the payment of principal of or interest on the outstanding Parity Bonds (for investments in the Principal and Interest Account) or having a guaranteed redemption price prior to maturity and, in no event, maturing later than the last maturity of any remaining outstanding Parity Bonds (for investments in the Reserve Account). Earnings from investments in the Principal and Interest Account shall be deposited in that account. Earnings from investments in the Reserve Account shall be deposited in that account. (c) The Reserve Account. The Reserve Account may be divided into subaccounts for each issue of Parity Bonds outstanding. Except for withdrawals as authorized below, the amount on deposit in the Reserve Account (including any subaccounts) shall meet the Reserve Requirement at all times so long as any of the Parity Bonds are outstanding. The amount required to be deposited in the Reserve Account (or any subaccount) shall be decreased when and to the extent the City has provided for the Reserve Requirement by means of Alternate Security. If there is a deficiency in the Principal and Interest Account to meet maturing installments of either principal or interest, as the case may be, that deficiency shall be made up ratably from the Reserve Account and its subaccounts based on the amount of the total Reserve Requirement to be paid into each subaccount (except when Alternative Security requires all cash and investments in the Reserve Account be withdrawn before draws on the Alternate Security) by the withdrawal of cash for that purpose. Any deficiency created in the Reserve Account (and its subaccounts) by reason of any such withdrawal shall then be made up from ULID Assessment payments and the Net Revenue of the System first available after making necessary provisions for the required payments into the Principal and Interest Account. Except for withdrawals described above, the money in the Reserve Account and its subaccounts otherwise shall be held intact and may be applied against the last outstanding bonds payable out of the Bond Fund. However, if at any time the Reserve Account or any subaccount is fully funded, money in excess of the Reserve Requirement shall be withdrawn and deposited, first, in any other subaccount having a deficiency in its Reserve Requirement, and second, at the option of the Finance Director, either in the Principal and Interest Account and spent for the purpose of retiring Parity Bonds or in any of the System Funds and spent for other lawful System purposes. Section 11. Rate Stabilization Fund. The Utility System Rate Stabilization Fund has been previously established by Ordinance No. 4945. The City may at any time, as determined by the City and as consistent with Section 14 of this ordinance, deposit in the Rate Stabilization ORD.A Page 113 of 339 -14- Fund Gross Revenue and any other money received by the System and available to be so deposited, excluding principal proceeds of any Future Parity Bonds or other borrowing. No deposit of Gross Revenue shall be made into the Rate Stabilization Fund to the extent that such deposit would prevent the City from meeting the Coverage Requirement in the relevant fiscal year. The City may, upon authorization by ordinance, at any time withdraw money from the Rate Stabilization Fund for inclusion in the Net Revenue for the then-current fiscal year of the System, except that the total amount withdrawn from the Rate Stabilization Fund in any fiscal year of the System may not exceed the total debt service of the System in that year. Such deposits or withdrawals may be made up to and including the date 90 days after the end of the fiscal year for which the deposit or withdrawal will be included as Net Revenue for that fiscal year. Earnings from investments in the Rate Stabilization Fund shall be deposited in that fund and shall not be included as Net Revenue of the System unless and until withdrawn from that fund as provided herein. The City may also deposit earnings from investments in the Rate Stabilization Fund into any System fund as authorized by ordinance, and such deposits shall be included as Net Revenue in the year of deposit. Section 12. Pledge of Revenue and Lien Position. The Net Revenue of the System and ULID Assessments are pledged to the payment of the Parity Bonds, and this pledge with respect to the Parity Bonds shall constitute a lien and charge upon such Net Revenue and ULID Assessments prior and superior to any other charges whatsoever. Section 13. Deposit of Bond Proceeds. One or more special accounts within the System Funds, designated as the Construction Accounts, have previously been established in the office of the Finance Director. The principal proceeds and premium, if any, received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds remaining after satisfaction of the Reserve Requirement shall be paid into the Construction Accounts and used to pay the costs of the Improvements and the cost of issuing of the Bonds. Until needed to pay such costs, the City may invest principal proceeds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings may be retained in the Construction Accounts and be spent for the purposes of those accounts. Section 14. Covenants. The City covenants and agrees with the owner of each Bond at any time outstanding, as follows: (a) ULID Assessments. All ULID Assessments shall be paid into the Bond Fund and may be used to build up the required reserves in the Reserve Account and to pay the principal of and interest on the Parity Bonds, without those ULID Assessments’ being particularly allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest on any particular issue of bonds. (b) Maintenance and Operation. The City will at all times maintain, preserve and keep the properties of the System in good repair, working order and condition, will make all necessary and proper additions, betterments, renewals and repairs thereto, and improvements, replacements and extensions thereof, and will at all times operate or cause to be operated the properties of the System and the business in connection therewith in an efficient manner and at a reasonable cost. (c) Establishment and Collection of Rates and Charges. The City will establish, maintain and collect rates and charges for all services and facilities provided by the System ORD.A Page 114 of 339 -15- which will be fair and nondiscriminatory. To the extent allowable by law, those to which service of the System is available will be charged for that service at the prevailing rate within 30 days of the availability of that service. Furthermore, the City will adjust those rates and charges from time to time so that: (i) The Gross Revenue of the System will at all times be sufficient to (A) pay all Maintenance and Operation Expense on a current basis, (B) pay when due all amounts that the City is obligated to pay into the Bond Fund and the accounts therein, (C) pay all taxes, assessments or other governmental charges lawfully imposed on the System or the revenue therefrom or payments in lieu thereof and any and all other amounts which the City may now or hereafter become obligated to pay from the Gross Revenue of the System by law or contract; and (ii) The Net Revenue of the System and ULID Assessments in each calendar year will be at least equal to the Coverage Requirement. (d) Sale or Disposition of the System. The City will not sell or otherwise dispose of the System in its entirety unless, simultaneously with such sale or other disposition, all Parity Bonds are redeemed and retired, or defeased pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. Furthermore, it will not sell, lease, mortgage or in any manner encumber or otherwise dispose of any part of the System, including all additions and improvements thereto and extensions thereof at any time made, that is used, useful or material in the operation of the System (each, as used in this subparagraph, a “transfer”), unless provision is made for the replacement thereof or for payment into the Bond Fund of the greatest of the following: (i) An amount which will be in the same proportion to the net amount of Parity Bonds then outstanding (defined as the total amount of those bonds less the amount of cash and investments in the Bond Fund and accounts therein) that the Gross Revenue of the System from the portion of the System sold or disposed of for the preceding year bears to the total Gross Revenue of the System for that period; or (ii) An amount which will be in the same proportion to the net amount of Parity Bonds then outstanding (as defined above) that the Net Revenue from the portion of the System sold or disposed of for the preceding year bears to the total Net Revenue of the System for such period; or (iii) An amount which will be in the same proportion to the net amount of Parity Bonds then outstanding (as defined above) that the cost of the assets sold or disposed of (less depreciation) bears to the cost of the assets of the entire System (less depreciation) immediately prior to such sale or disposition; or (iv) An amount which will be in the same proportion to the net amount of Parity Bonds then outstanding (as defined above) that the number of customers served by the portion of the System sold or disposed bears to the number of customers served by the entire System prior to such sale or disposition. Before any such transfer under this subsection (d) with respect to greater than 5% of the total assets of the System (measured by cost of the assets less depreciation), the City must obtain a certificate of an Independent Utility Consultant to the effect that in his or her professional ORD.A Page 115 of 339 -16- opinion, upon such transfer of assets, the remaining System will retain its operational integrity and the Net Revenue of the System will be at least equal to the Coverage Requirement during the five fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the transfer is to occur, taking into account (1) the reduction in revenue resulting from the transfer, (2) the use of any proceeds of the transfer for the redemption of Parity Bonds, and (3) the Independent Utility Consultant’s estimate of revenue from customers anticipated to be served by any additions to and betterments and extensions of the System financed in part by the proposed portion of the proceeds of the transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection (d), (1) the City in its discretion may sell or otherwise dispose of any of the works, plant, properties or facilities of the System or any real or personal property comprising a part of the same which shall have become unserviceable, inadequate, obsolete or unfit to be used in the operation of the System, or no longer necessary, material to or useful to the operation of the System, without making any deposit into the Bond Fund, (2) the City may transfer the System to another municipal corporation so long as ULID Assessments and Net Revenue with respect to the portion of the System so transferred are used for payment of debt service on Parity Bonds prior to any other purpose, or (3) the City in its discretion may carry out such a transfer if the aggregate cost of the facilities, property or other assets (less depreciation) being transferred under this subparagraph comprises no more than 5% of the costs of all of the assets of the System (less depreciation). (e) Liens Upon the System. The City will not at any time create or permit to accrue or to exist any lien or other encumbrance or indebtedness upon the Gross Revenue of the System, or any part thereof, prior or superior to the lien thereon for the payment of Parity Bonds, and will pay and discharge, or cause to be paid and discharged, any and all lawful claims for labor, materials or supplies which, if unpaid, might become a lien or charge upon the Gross Revenue of the System, or any part thereof, prior to or superior to the lien of the Parity Bonds, or which might impair the security of the Parity Bonds. (f) Books and Accounts. The City will keep proper books, records and accounts with respect to the operations, income and expenditures of the System in accordance with proper accounting procedures and any applicable rules and regulations prescribed by the State of Washington. It will prepare annual financial and operating statements within 270 days of the close of each fiscal year showing in reasonable detail the financial condition of the System as of the close of the previous year, and the income and expenses for such year, including the amounts paid into the Bond Fund and into any and all special funds or accounts created pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance, the status of all funds and accounts as of the end of such year, and the amounts expended for maintenance, renewals, replacements and capital additions to the System. Such statements shall be sent to the owner of any Parity Bonds upon written request therefor being made to the City. (g) No Free Service. Except to aid the poor or infirm, to provide for resource conservation or to provide for the proper handling of hazardous materials, it will not furnish or supply or permit the furnishing or supplying of any service or facility in connection with the operation of the System free of charge to any person, firm or corporation, public or private, other than the City, so long as any Parity Bonds are outstanding. (h) Collection of Delinquent Accounts. On at least an annual basis, it will determine all accounts that are delinquent and will take all necessary action to enforce payment of such accounts against those property owners whose accounts are delinquent. ORD.A Page 116 of 339 -17- (i) Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance. It will carry the types of insurance on its System properties in the amounts normally carried by private water, sewer and storm drainage utility companies engaged in the operation of water, sewer and storm drainage systems, and the cost of such insurance shall be considered a part of Maintenance and Operation Expense, or it will implement and maintain a self-insurance program or an insurance pool program with reserves adequate, in the reasonable judgment of the City, to protect the owners of the Parity Bonds against loss. (j) Condemnation Awards. Any condemnation awards received by the City in excess of l% of cost of the assets of the System (less depreciation) shall be applied to one or more of the following: (1) to the damaged property, (2) to retiring bonds, and (3) to improvements of the System. Section 15. Flow of Funds. (a) The Gross Revenue of the System shall be deposited in the System Funds and used for the following purposes only in the following order of priority: (i) To pay Maintenance and Operation Expense; (ii) To pay, together with ULID Assessments, first, the interest on and, second, the principal of the Parity Bonds when due or as the principal is required to be paid and to make all payments required to be made into any mandatory redemption or sinking fund account created to provide for the payment of the principal of Term Bonds; (iii) To make, together with ULID Assessments, all payments required to be made into the Reserve Account or its subaccounts and to make all payments required to be made pursuant to a reimbursement agreement in connection with an Alternate Security, except that if there is not sufficient money to make all payments under reimbursement agreements, the payments will be made on a pro rata basis; (iv) To make all payments required to be made into any revenue bond, note, warrant or other revenue obligation redemption fund, debt service account or reserve account created to pay or secure the payment of the principal of and interest on any revenue bonds, notes, warrants or other obligations of the City having a lien upon the revenue of the System subordinate to the lien thereon for the payment of the principal of and interest on any Parity Bonds; (v) To make necessary additions, betterments and improvements and repairs to or extensions and replacements of the System, to retire by redemption or purchase in the open market any outstanding revenue obligations or other obligations of the System, to make deposits into the Rate Stabilization Fund, or to provide for any other lawful City purpose. (b) To meet the required payments to be made into the Bond Fund, the City may transfer any money from any funds or accounts of the System legally available therefor, except bond redemption funds, refunding escrow funds, defeasance or other trust funds. Section 16. Provisions for Future Parity Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue Future Parity Bonds if the Parity Conditions are met and complied with at the time of the ORD.A Page 117 of 339 -18- issuance of those Future Parity Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this ordinance shall prevent the City from issuing Future Parity Bonds to refund maturing Parity Bonds then outstanding, money for the payment of which is not otherwise available. Furthermore, nothing contained in this ordinance shall prevent the City from issuing revenue bonds or other obligations that are a charge upon the Gross Revenue of the System subordinate to the payments required to be made into the Bond Fund for the payment of any Parity Bonds, or from pledging the payment of ULID assessments into a bond redemption fund created for the payment of the principal of and interest on those subordinate bonds or obligations if such ULID assessments are levied for improvements constructed from the proceeds of those subordinate bonds. Section 17. Separate Utility Systems. The City may create, acquire, construct, finance, own and operate one or more additional systems for water supply, sewer service, water, sewage or stormwater transmission, treatment or other commodity or service. The revenue of that separate utility system shall not be included in the Gross Revenue of the System and may be pledged to the payment of revenue obligations issued to purchase, construct, condemn or otherwise acquire or expand the separate utility system. Neither the Gross Revenue nor the Net Revenue of the System shall be pledged by the City to the payment of any obligations of a separate utility system except (1) as a Contract Resource Obligation upon compliance with Section 18 hereof and/or (2), with respect to the Net Revenue, on a basis subordinate to the lien of the Parity Bonds on that Net Revenue. Section 18. Contract Resource Obligations. (a) The City may at any time enter into one or more contracts or other obligations for the acquisition (from facilities yet to be constructed) of water supply, sewer service, water sewer or stormwater transmission, treatment or other commodity or service relating to the System. The City may determine that such contract or other obligation is a Contract Resource Obligation, and may provide that all payments under that Contract Resource Obligation (including payments prior to the time that water supply, transmission, treatment or other commodity or service is being provided, or during a suspension or after termination of supply or service) shall be Maintenance and Operation Expense if the following requirements are met at the time such Contract Resource Obligation is entered into: (i) No Event of Default as defined in Section 25 of this ordinance has occurred and is continuing. (ii) There is on file a certificate of an Independent Utility Consultant stating that (A) the payments to be made by the City in connection with the Contract Resource Obligation are reasonable for the supply, transmission, treatment or other service rendered; (B) the source of any new supply, and any facilities to be constructed to provide the supply, transmission, treatment or other service, are sound from a water, sewerage, or other commodity supply or transmission planning standpoint, are technically and economically feasible in accordance with prudent utility practice, and are likely to provide supply or transmission or other service no later than a date set forth in the Independent Utility Consultant’s certification; and (C) the Net Revenue (further adjusted by the Independent Utility Consultant’s estimate of the payments to be made in accordance with the Contract Resource Obligation) for the five fiscal years following the year in which the Contract Resource Obligation is incurred, as such Net Revenue is estimated by the Independent Utility Consultant (with such ORD.A Page 118 of 339 -19- estimate based on such factors as he or she considers reasonable), will be at least equal to the Coverage Requirement. (b) Payments required to be made under Contract Resource Obligations shall not be subject to acceleration. (c) Nothing in this Section 18 shall be deemed to prevent the City from entering into other agreements for the acquisition of water supply, sewer service, water, sewage or stormwater transmission, treatment or other commodity or service from existing facilities and from treating those payments as Maintenance and Operation Expense. Nothing in this Section 18 shall be deemed to prevent the City from entering into other agreements for the acquisition of water supply, transmission, treatment or other commodity or service from facilities to be constructed and from agreeing to make payments with respect thereto, such payments constituting a lien and charge on Net Revenue subordinate to that of the Outstanding Parity Bonds, the Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds. Section 19. Tax Covenants. (a) Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Tax-Exempt Bonds. The City covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of such Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of such Bonds at any time during the term of such Bonds which will cause interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City also covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirements of Section 148 of the Code are applicable to the Tax-Exempt Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having complied) with those requirements in connection with such Bonds, including the calculation and payment of any penalties that the City has elected to pay as an alternative to calculating rebatable arbitrage, and the payment of any other penalties if required under Section 148 of the Code to prevent interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. (b) Post-Issuance Compliance. The Finance Director is authorized and directed to review and update the City’s written procedures to facilitate compliance by the City with the covenants in this Section 19 and the applicable requirements of the Code that must be satisfied after the Issue Date to maintain the tax treatment of the Tax-Exempt Bonds and the receipt of interest thereon. Section 20. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to State law or use money available from any other lawful source to carry out a refunding or defeasance plan, which may include (a) paying when due the principal of and interest on the affected Bonds (the “defeased Bonds”); (b) redeeming the defeased Bonds prior to their maturity; and (c) paying the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If the City sets aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption or defeasance (the “trust account”), money and/or Government Obligations maturing at a time or times and bearing interest in amounts sufficient to redeem, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with their terms, then all right and interest of the Owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall cease and become void. Thereafter, the Owners of defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds solely from the trust ORD.A Page 119 of 339 -20- account and the defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding. In that event, the City may apply money remaining in any fund or account (other than the trust account) established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purpose, subject only to the rights of the registered owners of any other Parity Bonds then outstanding. While a Bond is registered in the name of the Securities Depository, notice of any defeasance shall be given in the manner prescribed in the Letter of Representations for notices of redemption of Bonds. If a Bond ceases to be held in book-entry form, then unless specified by the City in a refunding or defeasance plan, selection of Bonds to be defeased, notice of defeasance and replacement of Bond certificates shall be done in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance for the redemption of Bonds prior to their maturity. If the refunding plan provides that the defeased Bonds or the refunding bonds to be issued be secured by cash and/or Government Obligations pending the prior redemption of those Bonds being refunded and if such refunding plan also provides that certain cash and/or Government Obligations are irrevocably pledged for the prior redemption of the defeased Bonds, then only the debt service on the Bonds which are not defeased Bonds and the refunding bonds, the payment of which is not so secured by the refunding plan, shall be included in the computation of the Coverage Requirement for the issuance of Future Parity Bonds and the annual computation of coverage for determining compliance with the rate covenants. Section 21. Sale and Delivery of the Bonds. (a) Manner of Sale of Bonds; Delivery of Bonds. The Designated Representative is authorized to sell the Bonds by negotiated sale to the Underwriter, based on her assessment of market conditions, in consultation with appropriate City officials and staff, Bond Counsel and other advisors. In determining the Final Terms, the Designated Representative shall take into account those factors that, in her judgment, may be expected to result in the lowest true interest cost on the Bonds to their maturity, including, but not limited to, current interest rates for obligations comparable to the Bonds. The Bond Purchase Agreement for the Bonds shall set forth the Final Terms of each Series of Bonds. The Designated Representative is authorized to execute the Bond Purchase Agreement on behalf of the City, so long as the terms provided therein are consistent with the terms of this ordinance. (b) Preparation, Execution and Delivery of the Bonds. The Bonds will be prepared at City expense and will be delivered to the Underwriter in accordance with the Bond Purchase Agreement, with the approving legal opinion of Bond Counsel regarding the Bonds. Section 22. Official Statement. (a) Preliminary Official Statement. The Designated Representative shall review the form of each preliminary official statement prepared in connection with the sale of the Bonds to the public. For the sole purpose of the Underwriter’s compliance with paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12, the Designated Representative is authorized to “deem final” that preliminary official statement as of its date, except for the omission of information permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City approves the distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds of a preliminary official statement that has been “deemed final” in accordance with this paragraph. (b) Approval of Final Official Statement. The City approves the preparation of a final official statement for the Bonds to be sold to the public in the form of the preliminary official statement, with such modifications and amendments as the Designated Representative deems ORD.A Page 120 of 339 -21- necessary or desirable, and further authorizes the Designated Representative to execute and deliver such final official statement to the Underwriter. The City authorizes and approves the distribution by the Underwriter of that final official statement to purchasers and potential purchasers of the Bonds. Section 23. Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. To meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, as applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds, the City makes the following Undertaking for the benefit of holders of the Bonds: (a) Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Material Events. The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a designated agent, to the MSRB, in electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB: (i) Annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final official statement for the Bonds and described in subsection (b) of this section (“annual financial information”); (ii) Timely notice (not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event) of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (1) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) non- payment-related defaults, if material; (3) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (4) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (6) adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 – TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds; (7) modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds, if material; (8) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term Bonds), if material, and tender offers; (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) rating changes; (12) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City, as such “Bankruptcy Events” are defined in Rule 15d2-12; (13) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (14) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (iii) Timely notice of a failure by the City to provide required annual financial information on or before the date specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual financial information that the City undertakes to provide in subsection (a) of this section: (i) Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally ORD.A Page 121 of 339 -22- accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Government Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) and made applicable to Washington state local governmental units such as the City, as such principles may be changed from time to time, which statements may be unaudited, provided, however, that if and when audited financial statements are otherwise prepared and available to the City they will be provided; (2) a statement of authorized, issued and outstanding bonded debt secured by Net Revenue of the System and ULID Assessments; (3) debt service coverage ratios; and (4) general customer statistics for the System; (ii) Shall be provided not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of each fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing with the City’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2012; and (iii) May be provided in a single or multiple documents, and may be incorporated by specific reference to documents available to the public on the Internet website of the MSRB or filed with the SEC. (c) Amendment of Undertaking. The Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, participating underwriter, rating agency or the MSRB, under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City will give notice to the MSRB of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial information to be provided, the annual financial information containing the amended financial information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type of information to be provided. (d) Beneficiaries. The Undertaking evidenced by this section shall inure to the benefit of the City and the Beneficial Owner of a Bond, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person. (e) Termination of Undertaking. The City’s obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City’s obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate if those provisions of Rule 15c2-12 which require the City to comply with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as confirmed by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, or other counsel familiar with federal securities laws, delivered to the City, and the City provides timely notice of such termination to the MSRB. (f) Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the City learns of any failure to comply with the Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Bonds. The sole remedy of any holder of a Bond shall be to take such actions as that holder deems necessary, including seeking an order of specific performance from an appropriate court, to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking. (g) Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance Director (or such other officer of the City who may in the future perform the duties of that office) ORD.A Page 122 of 339 -23- or his or her designee is authorized and directed in his or her discretion to take such further actions as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to carry out the Undertaking of the City in respect of the Bonds set forth in this section and in accordance with Rule 15c2-12, including, without limitation, the following actions: (i) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided; (ii) Determining whether any event specified in subsection (a) has occurred, assessing its materiality, where necessary, with respect to the Bonds, and, if material, preparing and disseminating any required notice of its occurrence; (iii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an “obligated person” within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of listed events for that person in accordance with Rule 15c2-12; (iv) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants, including but not limited to financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out the Undertaking; and (v) Effecting any necessary amendment of the Undertaking. Section 24. Supplemental or Amendatory Ordinances. This ordinance shall not be modified or amended in any respect subsequent to the initial issuance of the Bonds, except as provided in and in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section. For purposes of this provision, the passage of an ordinance authorizing the issuance of Future Parity Bonds shall not be considered a supplemental ordinance. (a) Certain Supplemental or Amendatory Ordinances Permitted Without Bond Owner Consent. The City, from time to time, and at any time, without the consent of or notice to the registered owners of the Bonds or the Parity Bonds, may pass supplemental or amendatory ordinances as set forth in this subsection (a). Before the City shall pass any such supplemental or amendatory ordinance pursuant to this subsection, there shall have been delivered to the City and the Bond Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel, stating that such ordinance is authorized or permitted by this ordinance and, upon the execution and delivery thereof, will be valid and binding upon the City in accordance with its terms and will not adversely affect the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of interest on any tax-exempt Parity Bonds then outstanding. The permitted purposes under this subsection (a) are: (i) To cure any formal defect, omission, inconsistency or ambiguity in this ordinance in a manner not adverse to the owner of any Parity Bond; (ii) To impose upon the Bond Registrar (with its consent) for the benefit of the registered owners of the Bonds any additional rights, remedies, powers, authority, security, liabilities or duties which may lawfully be granted, conferred or imposed and which are not contrary to or inconsistent with this ordinance as theretofore in effect; ORD.A Page 123 of 339 -24- (iii) To add to the covenants and agreements of, and limitations and restrictions upon, the City in this ordinance, other covenants, agreements, limitations and restrictions to be observed by the City which are not contrary or inconsistent with this ordinance as theretofore in effect; (iv) To confirm, as further assurance, any pledge under, and the subjection to any claim, lien or pledge created or to be created by this ordinance of any other money, securities or funds; (v) To authorize different denominations of the Bonds and to make correlative amendments and modifications to this ordinance regarding exchangeability of Bonds of different authorized denominations, redemptions of portions of Bonds of particular authorized denominations and similar amendments and modifications of a technical nature; (vi) To modify, alter, amend or supplement this ordinance in any other respect which is not materially adverse to the registered owners of Parity Bonds and which does not involve a change described in subsections (b) or (c) of this section; (vii) Because of change in federal law or rulings, to maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds from federal income taxation; and (viii) To add to the covenants and agreements of, and limitations and restrictions upon, the City in this ordinance, other covenants, agreements, limitations and restrictions to be observed by the City which are requested by the Bond Insurer (if any) or provider of an Alternate Security and which changes are not materially adverse to the registered owners of Parity Bonds. (b) Supplemental or Amendatory Ordinances Requiring Consent of All Registered Owners. Unless approved in writing by the registered owners of all Parity Bonds then outstanding, nothing contained in this section shall permit, or be construed as permitting: (1) a change in the times, amounts or currency of payment of the principal of or interest on any outstanding Parity Bond or a reduction in the principal amount or redemption price of any outstanding Parity Bond or a change in the redemption price of any outstanding Parity Bond or a change in the method of determining the rate of interest thereon; (2) a preference of priority of any Parity Bonds or any other bond or bonds, or (3) a reduction in the aggregate principal amount of any Parity Bond. (c) Supplemental or Amendatory Ordinances Requiring Consent of Registered Owners of 60% of Parity Bonds Outstanding. In addition to any ordinance permitted pursuant to paragraph (a) and subject to the terms and conditions contained in subsection (d) and not otherwise, registered owners of not less than 60% in aggregate principal amount of the Parity Bonds then outstanding shall have the right from time to time to consent to and approve the adoption by the City of any supplemental or amendatory ordinance deemed necessary or desirable by the City for the purpose of modifying, altering, amending, supplementing or rescinding, in any particular, any of the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance, as follows: ORD.A Page 124 of 339 -25- (i) If at any time the City shall propose any supplemental or amendatory ordinance under this subsection (c), the City shall cause the Bond Register to give notice of the proposed supplemental or amendatory ordinance by first-class United States mail to all registered owners of any then outstanding Parity Bonds, to the Bond Insurer (if any), and to the Rating Agency. Such notice shall briefly set forth the nature of the proposed supplemental or amendatory ordinance and shall state that a copy thereof is on file at the office of the Bond Registrar for inspection by all registered owners of the outstanding Parity Bonds. (ii) At any time within two years after the date of the mailing of such notice, the City may pass such supplemental or amendatory ordinance in substantially the form described in such notice, but only if there shall have first been delivered to the Bond Registrar (1) the required consents, in writing, of the registered owners of the Parity Bonds, and (2) an opinion of Bond Counsel stating that such ordinance is authorized or permitted by this ordinance and, upon the execution and delivery thereof, will be valid and binding upon the City in accordance with its terms and will not adversely affect the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of interest on any tax-exempt Parity Bonds then outstanding. (iii) If registered owners of not less than the percentage of then outstanding Parity Bonds required by this subsection (c) shall have consented to and approved the proposed ordinance, no owner of outstanding Parity Bonds shall have any right (1) to object to the passage of such ordinance, (2) to object to any of the terms and provisions contained therein or the operation thereof, (3) in any manner to question the propriety of the passage thereof, or (4) to enjoin or restrain the City or the Bond Registrar from adopting the same or taking any action pursuant thereto. Upon the adoption of the supplemental or amendatory ordinance pursuant to the provisions of this section, this ordinance shall be, and shall be deemed to be, supplemented and amended accordingly. The respective rights, duties and obligations under this ordinance of the City, the Bond Registrar and all registered owners of Parity Bonds, shall thereafter be determined, exercised and enforced under this ordinance subject in all respects to such supplements and amendments. Section 25. Defaults and Remedies. (a) Events of Default. The following shall constitute “Events of Default” with respect to the Bonds: (i) If a default is made in the payment of the principal of or interest on any of the Bonds when the same shall become due and payable; or (ii) If the City defaults in the observance and performance of any other of the covenants, conditions and agreements on the part of the City set forth in this ordinance or any covenants, conditions or agreements on the part of the City contained in any Parity Bond authorizing ordinance and such default or defaults have continued for a period of six months after they have received from the Bondowners’ Trustee (as defined below) or from the registered owners of not less ORD.A Page 125 of 339 -26- than 25% in principal amount of the Parity Bonds, a written notice specifying and demanding the cure of such default. However, if the default in the observance and performance of any other of the covenants, conditions and agreements is one which cannot be completely remedied within the six months after written notice has been given, it shall not be an Event of Default with respect to the Bonds as long as the City has taken active steps within 90 days after written notice has been given to remedy the default and is diligently pursuing such remedy. (iii) If the City files a petition in bankruptcy or is placed in receivership under any state or federal bankruptcy or insolvency law. (b) Bondowners’ Trustee. So long as such Event of Default has not been remedied, a bondowners’ trustee (the “Bondowners’ Trustee”) may be appointed by the registered owners of 25% in principal amount of the Parity Bonds then outstanding, by an instrument or concurrent instruments in writing signed and acknowledged by such registered owners of the Parity Bonds or by their attorneys-in-fact duly authorized and delivered to such Bondowners’ Trustee, notification thereof being given to the City. That appointment shall become effective immediately upon acceptance thereof by the Bondowners’ Trustee. Any Bondowners’ Trustee appointed under the provisions of this Section 25(b) shall be a bank or trust company organized under the laws of the State of Washington or the State of New York or a national banking association. The bank or trust company acting as Bondowners’ Trustee may be removed at any time, and a successor Bondowners’ Trustee may be appointed, by the registered owners of a majority in principal amount of the Parity Bonds, by an instrument or concurrent instruments in writing signed and acknowledged by such registered owners of the Bonds or by their attorneys- in-fact duly authorized. The Bondowners’ Trustee may require such security and indemnity as may be reasonable against the costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred in the performance of its duties. If any Event of Default is, in the sole judgment of the Bondowners’ Trustee, cured and the Bondowners’ Trustee furnishes to the City a certificate so stating, that Event of Default shall be conclusively deemed to be cured and the City, the Bondowners’ Trustee and the registered owners of the Parity Bonds shall be restored to the same rights and position which they would have held if no Event of Default had occurred. The Bondowners’ Trustee appointed in the manner herein provided, and each successor thereto, is declared to be a trustee for the registered owners of all the Parity Bonds and is empowered to exercise all the rights and powers herein conferred on the Bondowners’ Trustee. (c) Suits at Law or in Equity. Upon the happening of an Event of Default and during the continuance thereof, the Bondowners’ Trustee may (and, upon the written request of the registered owners of not less than 25% in principal amount of the Parity Bonds outstanding, must) take such steps and institute such suits, actions or other proceedings, all as it may deem appropriate for the protection and enforcement of the rights of the registered owners of the Parity Bonds, to collect any amounts due and owing to or from the City, or to obtain other appropriate relief, and may enforce the specific performance of any covenant, agreement or condition contained in this ordinance or in any of the Parity Bonds. Nothing contained in this Section 25 shall, in any event or under any circumstance, be deemed to authorize the acceleration of maturity of principal on the Parity Bonds, and the remedy of acceleration is expressly denied to the registered owners of the Parity Bonds under any circumstances including, without limitation, upon the occurrence and continuance of an Event of Default. ORD.A Page 126 of 339 -27- Any action, suit or other proceedings instituted by the Bondowners’ Trustee hereunder shall be brought in its name as trustee for the Bondowners and all such rights of action upon or under any of the Parity Bonds or the provisions of this ordinance may be enforced by the Bondowners’ Trustee without the possession of any of those Parity Bonds and without the production of the same at any trial or proceedings relative thereto except where otherwise required by law. Any such suit, action or proceeding instituted by the Bondowners’ Trustee shall be brought for the ratable benefit of all of the registered owners of those Parity Bonds, subject to the provisions of this ordinance. The respective registered owners of the Parity Bonds, by taking and holding the same, shall be conclusively deemed irrevocably to appoint the Bondowners’ Trustee the true and lawful trustee of the respective registered owners of those Parity Bonds, with authority to institute any such action, suit or proceeding; to receive as trustee and deposit in trust any sums becoming distributable on account of those Parity Bonds; to execute any paper or documents for the receipt of money; and to do all acts with respect thereto that the registered owner himself or herself might have done in person. Nothing herein shall be deemed to authorize or empower the Bondowners’ Trustee to consent to accept or adopt, on behalf of any registered owner of the Parity Bonds, any plan of reorganization or adjustment affecting the Parity Bonds or any right of any registered owner thereof, or to authorize or empower the Bondowners’ Trustee to vote the claims of the registered owners thereof in any receivership, insolvency, liquidation, bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding to which the City is a party. (d) Application of Money Collected by Bondowners’ Trustee. Any money collected by the Bondowners’ Trustee at any time pursuant to this Section 25 shall be applied in the following order of priority: (i) First, to the payment of the charges, expenses, advances and compensation of the Bondowners’ Trustee and the charges, expenses, counsel fees, disbursements and compensation of its agents and attorneys. (ii) Second, to the payment to the persons entitled thereto of all installments of interest then due on the Parity Bonds in the order of maturity of such installments and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full any installment or installments maturing on the same date, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the amounts due thereon to the persons entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference. (iii) Third, to the payment to the persons entitled thereto of the unpaid principal amounts of any Parity Bonds which shall have become due (other than Parity Bonds previously called for redemption for the payment of which money is held pursuant to the provisions hereto), whether at maturity or by proceedings for redemption or otherwise, in the order of their due dates and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full the principal amounts due on the same date, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the principal amounts due thereon to the persons entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference. (e) Duties and Obligations of Bondowners’ Trustee. The Bondowners’ Trustee shall not be liable except for the performance of such duties as are specifically set forth herein. During an Event of Default, the Bondowners’ Trustee shall exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it hereby, and shall use the same degree of care and skill in its exercise, as a ORD.A Page 127 of 339 -28- prudent person would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of his or her own affairs. The Bondowners’ Trustee shall have no liability for any act or omission to act hereunder except for the Bondowners’ Trustee’s own negligent action, its own negligent failure to act or its own willful misconduct. The duties and obligations of the Bondowners’ Trustee shall be determined solely by the express provisions of this ordinance, and no implied powers, duties or obligations of the Bondowners’ Trustee shall be read into this ordinance. The Bondowners’ Trustee shall not be required to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur individual liability in the performance of any of its duties or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers as the Bondowners’ Trustee, except as may result from its own negligent action, its own negligent failure to act or its own willful misconduct. The Bondowners’ Trustee shall not be bound to recognize any person as a registered owner of any Bond until his or her title thereto, if disputed, has been established to its reasonable satisfaction. The Bondowners’ Trustee may consult with counsel and the opinion of such counsel shall be full and complete authorization and protection in respect of any action taken or suffered by it hereunder in good faith and in accordance with the opinion of such counsel. The Bondowners’ Trustee shall not be answerable for any neglect or default of any person, firm or corporation employed and selected by it with reasonable care. (f) Suits by Individual Bondowners Restricted. Neither the registered owner nor the beneficial owner of any one or more of Parity Bonds shall have any right to institute any action, suit or proceeding at law or in equity for the enforcement of same unless: (i) an Event of Default has happened and is continuing; and (ii) a Bondowners’ Trustee has been appointed; and (iii) such owner previously shall have given to the Bondowners’ Trustee written notice of the Event of Default on account of which such suit, action or proceeding is to be instituted; and (iv) the registered owners of 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Parity Bonds have made, after the occurrence of such Event of Default, written request of the Bondowners’ Trustee and have afforded the Bondowners’ Trustee a reasonable opportunity to institute such suit, action or proceeding; and (v) there have been offered to the Bondowners’ Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred therein or thereby; and (vi) the Bondowners’ Trustee has refused or neglected to comply with such request within a reasonable time. No registered owner or beneficial owner of any Parity Bond shall have any right in any manner whatever by his or her action to affect or impair the obligation of the City to pay from the Net Revenue the principal of and interest on such Parity Bonds to the respective owners thereof when due. ORD.A Page 128 of 339 -29- Section 26. Ratification. All actions previously taken in accordance with this ordinance are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 27. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and five days following its publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof, this 19th day of February, 2013. Peter B. Lewis, Mayor ATTEST: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Foster Pepper PLLC, Bond Counsel PUBLISHED: ORD.A Page 129 of 339 EXHIBIT A – Description of the Improvements The following Improvements are expected to be funded with proceeds of the Bonds. The estimates are only estimates at this time. The Improvements shall be carried out in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the City’s engineers and consulting engineers. The City Council may modify the details of the Improvements where, in its judgment, it appears advisable if such modifications do not substantially alter the purposes of that system or plan. Water System (Estimated Projects Total – $6,684,000.00) Location # Project Name Cost Estimate 1 Fulmer Well Field Improvements $1,955,000.00 2 Well 4 Power & Chlorination 1,199,000.00 3 Water Repair & Replacements 1,500,000.00 4 Lakeland Hills Reservoir & Improvements 750,000.00 5 Water Meter & Billing Improvements 500,000.00 6 BNSF Utilities Crossing 780,000.00 Storm Drainage System (Estimated Projects Total – $4,835,000.00) Location # Project Name Cost Estimate 1 Auburn Way South Flooding Phase 2 $1,638,000.00 2 30th St NE Area Flooding Phase 1 2,697,000.00 3 BNSF Utilities Crossing 500,000.00 ORD.A Page 130 of 339 B-1 EXHIBIT B – Parity Conditions As set forth in Section 16 of this Ordinance, the City may issue Future Parity Bonds on a parity with the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds if and only if the following conditions are met and complied with at the time of issuance of those proposed Future Parity Bonds: (a) There shall be no deficiency in the Bond Fund. (b) The ordinance providing for the issuance of the Future Parity Bonds shall provide that all assessments and interest thereon that may be levied in any ULID created for the purpose of paying, in whole or in part, the principal of and interest on those Future Parity Bonds, shall be paid directly into the Bond Fund, except for any prepaid assessments permitted by law to be paid into a construction fund or account. (c) The ordinance providing for the issuance of those Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the payment of the principal thereof and interest thereon out of the Bond Fund. (d) The ordinance providing for the issuance of such Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the deposit into the Reserve Account or a subaccount therein of (i) an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement for those Future Parity Bonds from the Future Parity Bond proceeds or other money legally available, or (ii) an Alternate Security (or an amount of cash plus Alternate Security) equal to the Reserve Requirement for those Future Parity Bonds, or (iii) to the extent that the Reserve Requirement is not funded from Future Parity Bond proceeds, other legally available money or Alternate Security at the time of issuance of those Future Parity Bonds, within five years from the date of issue of the Future Parity Bonds from ULID Assessments, if any, levied and first collected for the payment of the principal of and interest on those Future Parity Bonds and, to the extent that ULID Assessments are insufficient, then from the Net Revenue of the System in five approximately equal annual payments. (e) The ordinance authorizing the issuance of such Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the payment of mandatory redemption or sinking fund requirements into the Bond Fund for any Term Bonds to be issued and for regular payments to be made for the payment of the principal of such Term Bonds on or before their maturity, or, as an alternative, the mandatory redemption of those Term Bonds prior and up to their maturity date from money in the Principal and Interest Account. (f) There shall be on file with the City either: (i) A certificate from an Independent Utility Consultant showing that in his or her professional opinion, based on any 12 consecutive calendar months out of the immediately preceding 24 calendar months, the Net Revenue of the System (together with any ULID Assessment collections) shall be equal to the Coverage Requirement for each year thereafter. The certificate, in estimating the Net Revenue of the System available for debt service, may adjust Net Revenue of the System to reflect: (1) Any changes in rates in effect and being charged or expressly committed by ordinance to be made in the future; (2) Income derived from customers of the System who have become customers during the 12 consecutive month period or thereafter adjusted to reflect one year’s net revenue from those customers; ORD.A Page 131 of 339 B-2 (3) Income from any customers to be connected to the System who have paid the required connection charges; (4) The Independent Utility Consultant’s estimate of the Net Revenue of the System to be derived from customers anticipated to connect for whom new building permits have been issued; (5) The Independent Utility Consultant’s estimate of the Net Revenue of the System to be derived from customers with existing homes or buildings which will be required to connect to any additions to and improvements and extensions of the System constructed and to be paid for out of the proceeds of the sale of the additional Future Parity Bonds or other additions to and improvements and extensions of the System then under construction and not fully connected to the facilities of the System when such additions, improvements and extensions are completed; (6) Income received or to be received which is derived from any person, firm, corporation or municipal corporation under any executed contract for utility service, which revenue was not included in the historical Net Revenue of the System; and (7) Any increases or decreases in Net Revenue as a result of any actual or reasonably anticipated changes in Maintenance and Operation Expense subsequent to the 12-month period. (ii) In lieu of the certificate of an Independent Utility Consultant as described in paragraph (f)(i), there may be on file from the City Finance Director, a certificate showing that in his or her professional opinion, based on any 12 consecutive calendar months out of the immediately preceding 24 calendar months, and without the adjustments described in subparagraphs (1) through (7), above, the Net Revenue of the System shall be equal to the Coverage Requirement for each year thereafter. No certificate provided for in this paragraph (f) shall be required in connection with the issuance of a bond issue if the amount of bonds proposed to be issued does not exceed the ULID Assessments levied in support of such bond issue by more than $5,000.00 plus any amount of the proceeds of such bonds deposited in the Reserve Account as capitalized reserve. Furthermore, if the Future Parity Bonds proposed to be so issued are for the sole purpose of refunding outstanding Parity Bonds, no such certification of coverage shall be required if the Annual Debt Service in each year for the refunding bonds is not increased by $5,000.00 over the amount required for the bonds to be refunded thereby and the maturities of those refunding bonds are not extended beyond the maturities of the bonds to be refunded thereby. ORD.A Page 132 of 339 CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Auburn, Washington (the “City”), hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. 6451 (the “Ordinance”) is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on February 19, 2013, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after publication in the City’s official newspaper; and 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of February, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON _____________________________________ Danielle Daskam, City Clerk ORD.A Page 133 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4906 Date: February 6, 2013 Department: Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 4906 Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Finance Committee to recommend City Council adopt Resolution No. 4906. Background Summary: EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIVISION: The following police patrol vehicles have reached the end of the replacement cycle and their useful life. Replacements have been purchased and are now in service. P018D - 2008 Ford Crown Victoria - VIN: 2FAFP71V48X100243 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P018D P030H - 2008 Ford Crown Victoria - VIN: 2FAFP71V38X160188 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P030H P070A - 2007 Ford Crown Victoria - VIN: 2FAFP71W57X136174 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P070A P048C - 1999 Ford Crown Victoria - VIN: 2FAFP71W1XX185291 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P048C The following vehicle was in an accident in December of 2012 and has been declared a total loss. Pemco Insurance has agreed to a settlement. 6207A - 2008 Ford Escape - VIN: 1FMCU92Z98KD75527 Fixed Asset no. 55000 6207A Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Dowdy Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:RES.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 134 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4906 February 4, 2013 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4906 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DECLARING CERTAIN ITEMS OF PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THEIR DISPOSAL WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has a number of items which are no longer of use to the City; and WHEREAS, it would be appropriate to surplus the property and dispose of it by auction or other sale mechanism, or to dispose of it, in whole or in part, through gift to another governmental agency or an appropriate charitable non- profit entity, as deemed most expedient by the Mayor. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. Purpose. That the property identified below is declared to be surplus, and the Mayor is authorized to dispose of and convey such property through appropriate sale or donation to another governmental agency or charitable non-profit entity. Public Works Department EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIVISION: The following police patrol vehicles have reached the end of the replacement cycle and their useful life. Replacements have been purchased and are now in service. RES.A Page 135 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4906 February 4, 2013 Page 2 of 2 P018D – 2008 Ford Crown Victoria – VIN: 2FAFP71V48X100243 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P018D P030H – 2008 Ford Crown Victoria – VIN: 2FAFP71V38X160188 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P030H P070A – 2007 Ford Crown Victoria – VIN: 2FAFP71W57X136174 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P070A P048C – 1999 Ford Crown Victoria – VIN: 2FAFP71W1XX185291 Fixed Asset No. 55000 P048C The following vehicle was in an accident in December of 2012 and has been declared a total loss. Pemco Insurance has agreed to a settlement. 6207A – 2008 Ford Escape – VIN: 1FMCU92Z98KD75527 Fixed Asset no. 55000 6207A Section 2. Implementation. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. Effective Date. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN ________________________________ PETER B. LEWIS ATTEST: MAYOR ______________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney RES.A Page 136 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: SCADA System Overview Date: February 6, 2013 Department: Public Works Attachments: No Attachments Available Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Dowdy Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 137 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: December 2012 Financial Report Date: February 7, 2013 Department: Finance Attachments: December Monthly Report Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: The purpose of the monthly financial reports is to summarize for the City Council the general state of Citywide financial affairs and to highlight significant items or trends that the City Council should be aware of. The following provides a high level summary of the City's financial performance. Further detail can be found within the attached financial report. The December status report is based on financial data available as of February 8, 2013. Sales tax information represents business activity that occurred in October 2012. General Fund: The general fund is the City's largest fund and is used to account for the majority of City resources and services except those required by statute or to be accounted for in another fund. Revenue collections totaled $52.8 million and are running ahead of 2012 budget of $49.3 million due primarily to increased revenues from building permits, plan check fees, retail sales tax collections, and property tax collections. Retail sales tax collections for the year exceed budget and prior year collections by $772,000 and $184,000 respectively. 2012 property tax revenue collected exceed budget by $304,000 or 2.4%. The month of December saw several large one-time revenues related to new construction. These included building permit fees and development service fees related to The Outlet Collection-Seattle, as well as several housing developments including Kersey III, Brandon Meadows, and Bristoll Knoll. Expenses totaled $52.9 million and are running below budget of $59.0 million and compare to expenditures of $50.4 million for the same period last year. 2012 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 138 of 339 departmental expenses are below budget primarily due to lower expenses for SCORE due to not utilizing the budgeted contingency, earlier staff vacancies, and continued vigilance in monitoring general expenditures. Enterprise Funds: The City's eight enterprise funds account for operations with revenues primarily provided from user fees, charges or contracts for services. At the end of December, the Water fund ended with operating income of $968,200; the Sewer fund ended the period with a $520,900 operating loss; and the Storm Drainage fund ended with an operating loss of $457,500. The Golf Course ended the period with an operating loss of $365,000 as compared to an operating loss of $319,100 for the same period last year. Year-to-date rounds played at the Golf Course totaled 45,704 as compared to 45,968 the previous year. The Cemetery ended with a $170,700 operating loss as compared to an operating loss of $268,400 for the previous year, reflecting increased lot and marker sales. Internal Service Funds: Internal Service Funds provide services to other City departments and include functions such as Insurance, Facilities, Information Services, and Equipment Rental. By the end of the year, revenues received from charges to internal client departments are projected to be sufficient to meet expenses. Investment Portfolio: The City's total cash and investments at the end of December was $90.6 million compared to $90.9 million the previous month. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 139 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 General Fund 2011 Summary of Sources and Uses Annual BudgetYTD BudgetYTD ActualYTD ActualAmountPercentage OPERATING REVENUES Property Tax 12,562,565.0012,562,565.0012,866,488.2912,566,893.78303,923.29 2.4% Sales Tax 12,267,000.0012,267,000.0013,039,174.0012,855,629.76772,174.00 6.3% Sales Tax - Annexation Credit 1,383,730.001,383,730.001,542,272.011,466,220.30158,542.01 11.5% Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,212,900.001,212,900.001,401,994.791,347,647.03189,094.79 15.6% Brokered Natural Gas Tax 260,000.00260,000.00 302,212.32 298,836.0442,212.32 16.2% City Utilities Tax 2,620,200.002,620,200.002,799,882.762,522,971.22179,682.76 6.9% Admissions Tax 360,000.00360,000.00 344,697.23358,735.88(15,302.77)-4.3% Electric Tax 3,275,000.003,275,000.003,151,923.193,092,929.84(123,076.81)-3.8% Natural Gas Tax 1,295,820.001,295,820.001,113,400.111,120,788.95(182,419.89)-14.1% Cable TV Franchise Fee 703,600.00703,600.00812,228.47800,067.40108,628.47 15.4% Cable TV Franchise Fee - Capital 75,000.00 75,000.00 62,871.29 63,677.61(12,128.71)-16.2% Telephone Tax 2,012,400.002,012,400.001,995,453.062,006,135.62(16,946.94)-0.8% Garbage Tax (external)150,000.00 150,000.00 111,754.56 147,788.36(38,245.44)-25.5% Leasehold Excise Tax 50,000.00 50,000.00 39,262.42 49,467.40(10,737.58)-21.5% Gambling Excise Tax 331,500.00 331,500.00 261,702.83 253,963.97 (69,797.17)-21.1% Taxes sub-total 38,559,715.0038,559,715.0039,845,317.3338,951,753.161,285,602.33 3.3% Business License Fees 200,000.00200,000.00 231,956.50215,734.5031,956.50 16.0% Building Permits 700,000.00700,000.001,683,464.831,104,184.53983,464.83 140.5% Other Licenses & Permits 229,000.00 229,000.00 429,221.49469,955.06200,221.49 87.4% Intergovernmental (Grants, etc.) - (1)5,700,833.005,700,833.005,745,506.385,419,741.6644,673.38 0.8% Charges for Services: General Government Services 64,600.00 64,600.00 119,563.55 88,271.8154,963.55 85.1% Public Safety 223,500.00223,500.00206,247.50242,029.25(17,252.50)-7.7% Development Services Fees 627,000.00 627,000.001,229,896.41 516,158.24602,896.41 96.2% Culture and Recreation 920,000.00920,000.00 869,436.04 804,912.18(50,563.96)-5.5% Fines and Forfeits 1,499,800.00 1,499,800.00 1,577,091.78 1,940,326.03 77,291.78 5.2% Fees/Charges/Fines sub-total 10,164,733.0010,164,733.0012,092,384.4810,801,313.261,927,651.48 19.0% Interests and Other Earnings 115,000.00 115,000.00 89,804.67 86,931.62(25,195.33)-21.9% Rents, Leases and Concessions 311,000.00 311,000.00 326,094.55376,637.3015,094.55 4.9% Contributions and Donations 20,500.00 20,500.00 50,719.72 62,753.4730,219.72 147.4% Other Miscellaneous 46,200.00 46,200.00 119,753.70 123,604.5173,553.70 159.2% Transfers In 17,000.00 17,000.00 17,000.001,078,439.00 0.00 0.0% Insurance Recoveries- Capital & Operating 98,000.00 98,000.00 291,210.23 154,201.00 193,210.23 197.2% Other Revenues sub-total 607,700.00607,700.00894,582.871,882,566.90286,882.87 47.2% Total Operating Revenues 49,332,148.0049,332,148.0052,832,284.6851,635,633.333,500,136.68 7.1% Operating Expenditures Council & Mayor 895,283.00895,283.00910,566.08 793,172.08(15,283.08)-1.7% Municipal Court & Probation 3,399,260.003,399,260.003,143,611.903,052,278.43255,648.10 7.5% Human Resources 942,164.00942,164.00859,684.43 800,051.7082,479.57 8.8% Finance 1,235,590.001,235,590.001,144,457.791,117,925.8991,132.21 7.4% City Attorney 1,699,500.001,699,500.001,629,697.701,554,731.0569,802.30 4.1% Planning 3,883,620.003,883,620.003,852,992.243,746,365.2330,627.76 0.8% Community & Human Services 1,136,717.001,136,717.00938,354.89974,505.44198,362.11 17.5% Jail - SCORE 4,764,750.004,764,750.003,541,407.906,130,267.151,223,342.10 25.7% Police 20,087,708.0020,087,708.0018,161,146.4718,159,350.741,926,561.53 9.6% Engineering 2,766,870.002,766,870.002,526,525.722,257,553.36240,344.28 8.7% Parks and Recreation 7,700,990.007,700,990.007,326,660.156,988,485.02374,329.85 4.9% Streets 3,509,560.003,509,560.003,063,820.212,714,211.83445,739.79 12.7% Non-Departmental 6,930,550.006,930,550.005,762,410.072,153,566.951,168,139.93 16.9% Total Operating Expenditures 58,952,562.0058,952,562.0052,861,335.5550,442,464.876,091,226.45 10.3% 2012 2012 YTD Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) (1) The anticipated Streamlined Sales Tax for 2012 is $1.96 million. The 2012 Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation received from the state through the month of December 2012 was $1.89M. 1DI.B Page 140 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Overview This financial overview reflects the City’s overall financial position for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2012 (period 12) and represents financial data available as of February 8, 2013. General Fund revenues for the year totaled $52.8 million and were above budget by 7.1%, or $3.5 million. This period’s highlights include: - Tax revenues totaled $39.8 million and were $1.3 million above budget. - Sales taxes totaled $12.9 million and were $772,000 above budget. - Revenue from Fees/Charges/Fines totaled $12.1 million and was $1.9 million above budget due to stronger than budgeted revenue from development activity. - Other revenues totaled $895,000 and were 47.2% or $287,000 above budget primarily to insurance recoveries. General Fund expenses totaled $52.9 million compared to $50.4 million in 2011, reflecting one- time transfers to Cemetery, Golf Course debt and Cumulative Reserve funds. Departmental expenditures in 2012 were $ 6.1 million under budget due to earlier vacancies, reduced SCORE payments due to not utilizing the budgeted contingency, and continued vigilance in monitoring general spending. Revenues The combined total of property tax, sales/use tax, utility tax, gambling, and admissions tax provide approximately 80% of all resources supporting general governmental activities. The following section provides additional information on these sources. Property Tax collections in 2012 totaled $12.9 million and exceeds budget by $304,000 or 2.4%. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Mi l l i o n s Property Taxes 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual 2DI.B Page 141 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Sales taxes totaled $13.0 million and exceeds budget by $772,000. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Mi l l i o n s Sales & Use Tax 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual The following table breaks out the City’s base sales tax, excluding Criminal Justice, Annexation Credit and Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation by major business sectors. 20112012 Component GroupActualActualAmountPercentage New Construction 1,295,812.621,221,212.24(74,600.38)-5.8% Manufacturing 582,857.96404,711.89(178,146.07)-30.6% Transportation & Warehousing77,082.7054,951.78(22,130.92)-28.7% Wholesale Trade 1,260,083.041,296,717.9736,634.932.9% Automotive 2,785,420.793,018,627.11233,206.328.4% Retail Trade 3,780,129.483,923,913.16143,783.683.8% Services 2,882,241.233,056,492.04174,250.816.0% Miscellaneous 223,639.3860,699.33(162,940.05)-72.9% YTD Total 12,887,267.2013,037,325.52150,058.321.2% Change from 2011 Year to Date through December Comparison of Sales Tax Collections by SIC Group As shown above, sales taxes by business sector totaled $13.0 million and were $150,000, or 1.2% more than the year prior. 3DI.B Page 142 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 $10.0 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Mi l l i o n s Utility Tax 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual Utility Taxes consists of City inter-fund utility taxes (Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste) and external utility taxes (Electric, Natural Gas, Telephone and Solid Waste). External garbage tax in 2012 is $36,000 lower than what was received in 2011 due to the Pierce County solid waste contract annexation that occurred in March and October 2012. This reduction in revenue is offset by increased revenue realized in the City interfund utility tax revenue. The following table presents utility tax collections by source: 201120122012 Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage City Interfund Utility Taxes2,522,971.222,620,200.002,799,882.76276,911.5411.0%179,682.766.9% Electric 3,092,929.843,275,000.003,151,923.1958,993.351.9%(123,076.81)-3.8% Natural Gas 1,120,788.951,295,820.001,113,400.11(7,388.84)-0.7%(182,419.89)-14.1% Telephone 2,006,135.622,012,400.001,995,453.06(10,682.56)-0.5%(16,946.94)-0.8% Garbage (external)147,788.36150,000.00111,754.56(36,033.80)-24.4%(38,245.44)-25.5% YTD Total 8,890,613.999,353,420.009,172,413.68281,799.693.2%(181,006.32)-1.9% Year to Date through December Utility Tax by Type 2012 vs. 2011 2012 vs. Budget 4DI.B Page 143 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Cable TV Franchise Fees exceed budget by $109,000 and are comparable to 2011 levels. The final quarterly payment has been received – closing the year at $812,000 in collected revenue. $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter Th o u s a n d s Cable TV Franchise Fee 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual Licenses and Permits include business licenses, building permits, plumbing, electric and other licenses and permit fees. Building permit fees and Business licenses make up 80% of the annual budgeted revenue in this category. Building permit revenues in 2012 totaled $1.7 million and exceeded both budget and prior year levels of $1.1 million and $1.0 million respectively. December revenue collected for building permits was $129,000 and included over $47,000 in building permit revenue generated by Kersey III, Brandon Meadows and Bristol Knoll housing developments. In general, building permit activity has increased, reflecting the broader trend of increased construction activity in the region. 5DI.B Page 144 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Th o u s a n d s Building Permits 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual Business License revenues totaled $232,000 in 2012, compared to prior year collection rate of $216,000. This represents a 7.5% increase in collections compared to the prior year. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Th o u s a n d s Business Licenses 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual 6DI.B Page 145 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Intergovernmental includes Grants (Direct & Indirect Federal, State and Local), state shared revenues and compact revenue from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Collections totaled $5.7 million and exceeds budget by $45,000 or 0.8%. State shared revenue includes June 2012 disbursement of $188,000 by the State of Washington from the sale of state owned liquor stores 1 , as well as Streamlined Sales Tax of $1,894,001.25. 2011 20122012 Revenue ActualBudgetActual% Change% Change Federal Grants 473,187.35797,716.00626,244.71 32.3%-21.5% State Grants 128,231.0990,327.00162,000.87 26.3%79.3% Interlocal Grants 20,150.7492,000.0044,851.73 122.6%-51.2% State Shared Revenue4,060,998.484,020,790.004,181,935.39 3.0%4.0% Muckleshoot Casino Emerg.712,294.00700,000.00711,063.00 -0.2%1.6% Intergovernmental Service24,880.00 0.0019,410.68 -22.0%N/A YTD Total 5,419,741.665,700,833.005,745,506.38 6.0%0.8% Year to Date through December Intergovernmental 2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budget 201120122012 MonthActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage Jan771,244.96507,100.00376,544.57(394,700.39)-51.2%-130,555.43-25.7% Feb287,509.53439,200.00431,132.12143,622.5950.0%-8,067.88-1.8% Mar448,578.92474,600.00337,874.34(110,704.58)-24.7%-136,725.66-28.8% Apr436,725.78459,400.00530,148.3293,422.5421.4%70,748.3215.4% May529,175.73457,260.00425,585.83(103,589.90)-19.6%-31,674.17-6.9% Jun384,400.65498,392.00596,027.16211,626.5155.1%97,635.1619.6% Jul789,311.24669,280.00569,818.32(219,492.92)-27.8%-99,461.68-14.9% Aug332,729.83282,900.00406,609.6673,879.8322.2%123,709.6643.7% Sep419,658.58436,100.00632,745.80213,087.2250.8%196,645.8045.1% Oct541,563.81365,635.00697,177.58155,613.7728.7%331,542.5890.7% Nov102,082.46571,833.00248,511.45146,428.99143.4%-323,321.55-56.5% Dec376,760.17539,133.00493,331.23116,571.0630.9%-45,801.77-8.5% YTD Total5,419,741.665,700,833.005,745,506.38325,764.726.0%44,673.380.8% Year to Date through December Intergovernmental (Grants, Entitlements & Services) 2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budget 1 The City of Auburn received $188,230.00 from the sale of State owned liquor stores in the month of June 2012 and is reflected in this report. In addition, the City’s share of liquor excise taxes and liquor profits will be revised starting July 1. Liquor excise taxes will be suspended for a twelve month period and will be reinstated at a lowered level starting July 1, 2013 while liquor profits will be reduced to 2011 levels starting July 1. These changes were made as a result of the State Legislature’s effort to balance the State budget during the 2012 legislative session. 7DI.B Page 146 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Charges for Services consists of general governmental services, public safety, development service fees and cultural & recreation fees and totaled $2.4 million. Development service fees and culture and recreation fees make up over 85% of the revenue within this category. Development services revenues totaled $1.2 million compared to budget of $627,000 due to strong development activity. Culture and recreation revenues are improved over 2011 levels, reflecting increased registrations for summer camps, classes and league enrollment. 20112012 2012 Revenue ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage General Government88,271.8164,600.00119,563.5531,291.7435.45%54,963.5585.08% Public Safety 242,029.25223,500.00206,247.50(35,781.75)-14.8%(17,252.50)-7.7% Development Services516,158.24627,000.001,229,896.41713,738.17138.3%602,896.4196.2% Culture & Recreation804,912.18920,000.00869,436.0464,523.868.0%(50,563.96)-5.5% YTD Total1,651,371.481,835,100.002,425,143.50773,772.0246.9%590,043.5032.2% Year to Date through December Charges for Services by Type 2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budget $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Th o u s a n d s Development Service Fees 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual 8DI.B Page 147 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Th o u s a n d s Culture & Recreation 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual Fines & Penalties totaled $1.6 million and exceed budget by $77,000 or 5.2%. 201120122012 Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage Civil Penalties 21,477.0815,000.0016,644.12(4,832.96)-22.5%1,644.1211.0% Civil Infraction Penalties656,991.38555,000.00598,201.25(58,790.13)-8.9%43,201.257.8% Red Light Photo Enforcement825,337.06491,300.00595,246.60(230,090.46)-27.9%103,946.6021.2% Parking Infractions 172,136.93170,000.00109,690.99(62,445.94)-36.3%(60,309.01)-35.5% Criminal Traffic Misdemeanor81,487.20105,000.0090,140.478,653.2710.6%(14,859.53)-14.2% Criminal Non-Traffic Fines88,331.7690,000.0086,855.84(1,475.92)-1.7%(3,144.16)-3.5% Criminal Costs 15,102.9210,500.0015,499.86396.942.6%4,999.8647.6% Non-Court Fines & Penalties79,461.7063,000.0064,812.65(14,649.05)-18.4%1,812.652.9% YTD Total 1,940,326.031,499,800.001,577,091.78(363,234.25)-18.7%77,291.785.2% Year to Date through December Fines & Forfeits by Type 2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budget 9DI.B Page 148 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Mi l l i o n s Fines & Penalties 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Th o u s a n d s Photo Enforcement 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual 10DI.B Page 149 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Miscellaneous revenues include interest and other investment earnings, rents, leases & concessions, contributions & donations and other miscellaneous income. Revenues in this category totaled $586,000 and exceeded budget by $94,000. The majority of this increase in revenues was due to revenue generated from judgments and settlements, as well as a $44,000 refund from King County Regional Animal Control for the 2011 reconciliation. 201120122012 Month ActualBudgetActualAmountPercentageAmountPercentage Interest & Investments 86,931.62115,000.0089,804.672,873.053.3%(25,195.33)-21.9% Rents & Leases 376,637.30311,000.00326,094.55(50,542.75)-13.4%15,094.554.9% Contributions & Donations62,753.4720,500.0050,719.72(12,033.75)-19.2%30,219.72147.4% Other Miscellaneous Revenue123,604.5146,200.00119,753.70(3,850.81)-3.1%73,553.70159.2% YTD Total 649,926.90492,700.00586,372.64(63,554.26)-9.8%93,672.6419.0% Miscellaneous Revenues by Type Year to Date through December 2012 vs. 20112012 vs. Budget Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is receipted into the Capital Improvement Projects Fund and is used for governmental capital projects. 2012 REET revenue totaled $1.8 million and exceeds budget by $367,000. The revenue spike seen in the 4th quarter is primarily due to the sale of Auburn Regional Medical Center to Multicare. $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Mi l l i o n s Real Estate Excise Tax 2012 budget 2012 actual to date 2011 actual 11DI.B Page 150 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Enterprise Funds The following table provides an analysis of the City’s Enterprise funds – showing 2012 revenues and expenditures by fund. WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCemeteryGolf OPERATING REVENUES Charges for Services 10,281,519.48 5,376,523.95 7,447,392.88 11,472,757.58 15,443.11 825,767.84 980,528.64 Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 13,119,303.00 - - - - - Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - - - - 582,244.70 - 390,835.36 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 10,281,519.48 18,495,826.95 7,447,392.88 11,472,757.58 597,687.81 825,767.84 1,371,364.00 OPERATING EXPENSES: Administration 2,502,520.00 1,956,515.00 2,637,135.00 737,786.00 481,612.00 293,395.00 226,431.00 Operations & Maintenance 4,639,020.00 2,705,953.86 3,811,373.00 1,443,368.00 11,259.00 635,464.00 1,197,095.00 Waste Management Payments - - - 9,085,152.00 - - - Sewer Metro Services - 12,607,840.14 - - - - - Depreciation & Amortization 2,171,770.16 1,746,409.03 1,456,342.49 18,819.29 397,163.86 67,647.30 312,871.14 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 9,313,310.16 19,016,718.03 7,904,850.49 11,285,125.29 890,034.86 996,506.30 1,736,397.14 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)968,209.32 (520,891.08) (457,457.61) 187,632.29 (292,347.05) (170,738.46) (365,033.14) NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES Interest Revenue 35,331.86 33,133.68 18,749.79 872.21 2,123.00 392.15 870.47 Other Non Operating Revenue 725,905.41 111,224.37 97,716.93 102,583.12 1,020.48 15,129.17 9,845.85 Other Non Operating Expense (28,816.34) (20,541.21) - - (50,475.00) (22,267.44) (620.06) TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)732,420.93 123,816.84 116,466.72 103,455.33 (47,331.52) (6,746.12) 10,096.26 1,700,630.25 (397,074.24) (340,990.89) 291,087.62 (339,678.57) (177,484.58) (354,936.88) Contributions 476,710.40 292,615.90 583,993.49 - - - - Transfers In - - - - - 222,300.00 49,028.45 Transfers Out (50,000.00) (50,000.00) (50,000.00) - - - - TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS 426,710.40 242,615.90 533,993.49 - - 222,300.00 49,028.45 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 2,127,340.65 (154,458.34) 193,002.60 291,087.62 (339,678.57) 44,815.42 (305,908.43) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE January 1, 201263,028,695.18 73,274,006.39 47,772,203.90 760,681.15 9,731,158.11 814,709.47 5,144,961.68 ENDING FUND BALANCE December 31, 201265,156,035.83 73,119,548.05 47,965,206.50 1,051,768.77 9,391,479.54 859,524.89 4,839,053.25 INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS 12DI.B Page 151 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 The following table presents the Working Capital Statements for the City’s Enterprise funds. Working capital is generally defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCemeteryGolf OPERATING REVENUES Charges for Services 10,281,519.48 5,376,523.95 7,447,392.88 11,472,757.58 15,443.11 825,767.84 980,528.64 Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 13,119,303.00 - - - - - Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - - - - 582,244.70 - 390,835.36 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 10,281,519.48 18,495,826.95 7,447,392.88 11,472,757.58 597,687.81 825,767.84 1,371,364.00 OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries & Wages 2,088,137.74 1,384,708.50 1,912,747.72 394,378.43 19,734.46 437,638.97 562,959.98 Benefits 925,932.71 597,393.90 820,941.27 170,828.17 6,239.46 212,555.91 269,579.06 Supplies 211,126.70 64,502.12 72,206.45 44,827.72 - 151,786.23 267,053.80 Other Service Charges 2,811,344.38 1,852,265.44 2,287,388.72 987,111.07 466,897.93 60,769.48 161,921.61 Intergovernmental Services - - 20,002.51 399,507.84 - - - Waste Management Payments - - - 9,085,152.00 - - - Sewer Metro Services - 12,607,840.14 - - - - - Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies 1,104,997.77 763,598.61 1,331,511.51 184,500.00 - 66,108.00 162,012.00 Other Expenses - 3,709.92 - - - - Depreciation & Amortization 2,171,770.16 1,746,409.03 1,456,342.49 18,819.29 397,163.86 67,647.30 312,871.14 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 9,313,309.46 19,016,717.74 7,904,850.59 11,285,124.52 890,035.71 996,505.89 1,736,397.59 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)968,210.02 (520,890.79) (457,457.71) 187,633.06 (292,347.90) (170,738.05) (365,033.59) NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES Interest Revenue 35,331.86 33,133.68 18,749.79 872.21 2,123.00 392.15 870.47 Contributions 31,282.19 34,424.39 29,295.11 101,823.12 - 13,790.71 9,845.85 Other Non Operating Revenue 694,623.22 76,799.98 68,421.82 760.00 1,020.48 1,388.46 - Gain (Loss) on Sale of Fixed Assets - - - - - (50.00) - Debt Service Interest (28,816.34) (20,541.21) - - (50,475.00) (22,267.44) (620.06) TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)732,420.93 123,816.84 116,466.72 103,455.33 (47,331.52) (6,746.12) 10,096.26 Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital Depreciation 2,171,770.16 1,746,409.03 1,456,342.49 18,819.29 397,163.86 67,647.30 312,871.14 3,872,401.11 1,349,335.08 1,115,351.50 309,907.68 57,484.44 (109,836.87) (42,066.19) Increase in Contributions -System Development473,504.00 292,615.90 583,993.49 - - - - Increase in Contributions -Area Assessments 3,206.40 - - - - - - Increase in Contributions -Other Governments - - - - - - - Operating Transfers In - - - - - 222,300.00 49,028.45 Increase in Restricted Net Assets 14,376.40 47,337.03 - - (15,154.67) - Decrease in Long term Receivables - 45,000.00 - - - - - Increase in Deferred Credits - - - - 16,267.40 - - TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS491,086.80 384,952.93 583,993.49 - 1,112.73 222,300.00 49,028.45 Net Change in Restricted Net Assets 843,494.92 284,462.78 337,110.65 - (120,735.53) (50.00) (15,642.68) Increase in Fixed Assets - Salaries 167,600.29 94,969.52 62,264.36 - - - Increase in Fixed Assets - Benefits 64,494.65 37,236.28 23,975.55 - - - - Increase in Fixed Assets - Site Improvements 53,191.22 - - - 19,053.96 - - Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment 100,334.80 - - - - - - Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction 9,385,922.76 1,775,410.07 831,829.45 - 121,911.23 - - Operating Transfers Out 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 - - - - Debt Service Principal 435,568.48 288,261.96 - - 105,000.00 - - TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS 11,100,607.12 2,530,340.61 1,305,180.01 - 125,229.66 (50.00) (15,642.68) NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (6,737,119.21) (796,052.60) 394,164.98 309,907.68 (66,632.49) 112,513.13 22,604.94 BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL January 1, 201216,945,810.60 12,806,527.35 9,101,999.78 632,263.16 961,633.34 71,819.66 68,319.90 ENDING WORKING CAPITAL December 31, 201210,208,691.39 12,010,474.75 9,496,164.76 942,170.84 895,000.85 184,332.79 90,924.84 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (6,737,119.21) (796,052.60) 394,164.98 309,907.68 (66,632.49) 112,513.13 22,604.94 NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS 13DI.B Page 152 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 The Water Utility ended December with $968,200 in net operating income and compares to $500,200 for the same period in 2011. - 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Water Revenues ($) vs Water Sold (ccf) 2011 -Present 2011 Water Sales ($) 2012 Water Sales ($) 2011 Water Sold (ccf) 2012 Water Sold (ccf) The Sewer Utility ended the period with a $520,900 net operating loss and compares to a $2.2 million net loss for the same period in 2011. The Stormwater Utility ended the period with a $457,500 net operating loss which compares to $347,400 in net income for the same period last year. The net loss is the result of the timing of reimbursement from King County for the joint effort to remove the temporary flood control barrier along the Green River that was constructed during repairs to the Howard Hanson Dam. The reimbursement is currently being processed with the City set to receive full reimbursement of its expenses (approximately $1 million) sometime in 2013. The number of rounds played at the Auburn Golf Course (AGC) through December totaled 45,704 as compared to 45,968 for the same period last year. The AGC ended December with a net operating loss of $365,000 as compared to a loss of $319,100 for the same period last year. 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Golf Course Operating Revenues by Month (2012 vs 2011) 2012 Monthly Budget 2012 Actual 2011 Actual 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Cumulative Golf Course Operating Revenues (2012 vs 2011) 2012 Cumulative Budget 2012 Cumulative 2011 Cumulative 14DI.B Page 153 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 The Cemetery Fund ended December with a $170,700 net operating loss as compared to a $268,400 net operating loss for the same period last year, reflecting increased revenues from lot and marker sales. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Cemetery Operating Revenues by Month (2012 vs 2011) 2012 Monthly Budget 2012 Actual 2011 Actual 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Cumulative Cemetery Operating Revenues (2012 vs 2011) 2012 Cumulative Budget 2012 Cumulative 2011 Cumulative 15DI.B Page 154 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Internal Service Funds The following table provides an analysis of the City’s Internal Service funds – showing 2012 revenues and expenditures by fund. InnovationEquipment InsuranceFacilities& TechnologyRental OPERATING REVENUES: Interfund Charges for Services - 3,437,100.00 4,135,104.00 2,996,939.78 Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 142,347.83 82,484.00 - TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 3,579,447.83 4,217,588.00 2,996,939.78 OPERATING EXPENSES: Administration 159,148.20 - - 734,668.00 Operations & Maintenance - 3,400,774.30 4,117,449.98 1,407,968.00 Depreciation & Amortization - - 552,388.17 759,373.37 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 159,148.20 3,400,774.30 4,669,838.15 2,902,009.37 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(159,148.20) 178,673.53 (452,250.15) 94,930.41 NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES Interest Revenue 3,149.26 3,633.79 5,816.73 14,903.59 Other Non Operating Revenue - 13,072.26 15,171.68 15,258.49 Gain/Loss on Sale of Fixed Assets - - - 29,214.69 Other Non Operating Expense - - - - TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)3,149.26 16,706.05 20,988.41 59,376.77 INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS(155,998.94) 195,379.58 (431,261.74) 154,307.18 Contributions - - 54,986.48 103,550.53 Transfers In - 300,000.00 100,170.00 100,170.00 Transfers Out - (644,787.35) - (7,000.00) TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS - (344,787.35) 155,156.48 196,720.53 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (155,998.94) (149,407.77) (276,105.26) 351,027.71 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE January 1, 2012 2,184,680.02 1,570,418.73 4,350,183.06 10,135,919.06 ENDING FUND BALANCE December 31, 2012 2,028,681.08 1,421,010.96 4,074,077.80 10,486,946.77 16DI.B Page 155 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 The following table presents the Working Capital Statements for the City’s Internal Service funds. Working capital is generally defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. InnovationEquipment InsuranceFacilities& TechnologyRental OPERATING REVENUES: Interfund Charges for Services - 3,437,100.00 4,135,104.00 2,996,939.78 Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 142,347.83 82,484.00 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 3,579,447.83 4,217,588.00 2,996,939.78 OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries & Wages - 648,124.15 1,318,878.14 426,229.50 Benefits - 282,146.02 532,668.87 176,228.29 Supplies - 120,649.96 375,476.32 915,862.41 Other Service Charges 159,148.20 1,399,414.06 1,601,346.65 410,513.43 Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies - 97,896.00 289,080.00 213,802.30 Other Expenses - 852,544.11 - - Depreciation & Amortization - - 552,388.17 759,373.37 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 159,148.20 3,400,774.30 4,669,838.15 2,902,009.30 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(159,148.20) 178,673.53 (452,250.15) 94,930.48 NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES Interest Revenue 3,149.26 3,633.79 5,816.73 14,903.59 Contributions - 13,072.26 - 1,712.88 Other Non Operating Revenue - - 15,171.68 13,545.61 Gain/Loss on Sale of Fixed Assets - - - 29,214.69 Other Non Operating Expense - - - - TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)3,149.26 16,706.05 20,988.41 59,376.77 Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital Depreciation - - 552,388.17 759,373.37 (155,998.94) 195,379.58 121,126.43 913,680.62 Increase in Contributions -Other Governments - - 51,756.27 - Increase in Contributions -Other Funds - - 3,230.21 103,550.53 Operating Transfers In - 300,000.00 100,170.00 100,170.00 TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS - 300,000.00 155,156.48 203,720.53 Net Change in Restricted Net Assets - - 3,230.21 (75,273.67) Increase in Fixed Assets - Site Improvements - - 7,497.00 18,493.46 Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment - - 449,312.60 1,358,605.24 Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction - - 51,756.27 29,275.92 Operating Transfers Out - 644,787.35 - 7,000.00 TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS - 644,787.35 511,796.08 1,338,100.95 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (155,998.94) (149,407.77) (235,513.17) (220,699.80) BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL January 1, 2012 2,184,680.02 1,622,448.73 3,118,686.00 5,793,165.07 ENDING WORKING CAPITAL December 31, 2012 2,028,681.08 1,473,040.96 2,883,172.83 5,572,465.27 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (155,998.94) (149,407.77) (235,513.17) (220,699.80) NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS 17DI.B Page 156 of 339 Monthly Financial Report December 2012 Operating expenses within the Insurance Fund represents the premium cost-pool that will be allocated monthly to other City funds over the course of 2012. As a result, this balance has gradually diminished each month throughout the entire year. The Innovation & Technology Fund ended with a net loss, reflecting the timing of expenses. No significant variances are reported in the Facilities Fund or Equipment Rental Fund. Both funds have had sufficient revenues to cover year-to-date expenses. Contact Information This report is prepared by the Finance Department. Additional financial information can also be viewed at our website: http://www.auburnwa.gov/. For any questions about the report please contact us at mchaw@auburnwa.gov or scoleman@auburnwa.gov. 18DI.B Page 157 of 339 SALES TAX SUMMARY DECEMBER 2012 SALES TAX DISTRIBUTIONS (FOR NOVEMBER - OCTOBER 2012 RETAIL ACTIVITY) 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD NAICS CONSTRUCTION (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff NAICS AUTOMOTIVE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 236 Construction of Buildings 582,840 582,840 483,409 -17.1%441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer 2,560,962 2,560,962 2,795,164 9.1% 237 Heavy and Civil Construction 108,727 108,727 114,823 5.6%447 Gasoline Stations 224,459 224,459 223,463 -0.4% 238 Specialty Trade Contractors 604,245 604,245 622,980 3.1%TOTAL AUTOMOTIVE 2,785,421$ 2,785,421$ 3,018,627$ 8.4% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 1,295,813$ 1,295,813$ 1,221,212$ -5.8%Overall Change from Previous Year 233,206$ Overall Change from Previous Year (74,600)$ 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD NAICS RETAIL TRADE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff NAICS MANUFACTURING (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings 218,335 218,335 226,309 3.7% 311 Food Manufacturing 2,674 2,674 2,932 9.6%443 Electronics and Appliances 126,870 126,870 145,391 14.6% 312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 3,864 3,864 5,855 51.5%444 Building Material and Garden 382,504 382,504 425,494 11.2% 313 Textile Mills 959 959 570 -40.6%445 Food and Beverage Stores 330,776 330,776 341,379 3.2% 314 Textile Product Mills 2,625 2,625 4,457 69.8%446 Health and Personal Care Store 148,387 148,387 148,812 0.3% 315 Apparel Manufacturing 2,519 2,519 218 -91.4%448 Clothing and Accessories 754,407 754,407 772,153 2.4% 316 Leather and Allied Products 175 175 59 -66.4%451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books 126,042 126,042 120,507 -4.4% 321 Wood Product Manufacturing 24,075 24,075 31,417 30.5%452 General Merchandise Stores 967,627 967,627 967,039 -0.1% 322 Paper Manufacturing 11,026 11,026 3,944 -64.2%453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 489,259 489,259 508,326 3.9% 323 Printing and Related Support 38,511 38,511 28,275 -26.6%454 Nonstore Retailers 235,923 235,923 268,503 13.8% 324 Petroleum and Coal Products 9,771 9,771 10,532 7.8%TOTAL RETAIL TRADE 3,780,129$ 3,780,129$ 3,923,913$ 3.8% 325 Chemical Manufacturing 7,937 7,937 8,089 1.9%Overall Change from Previous Year 143,784$ 326 Plastics and Rubber Products 9,777 9,777 9,469 -3.2% 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 16,218 16,218 17,324 6.8% 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 452 452 1,766 290.4%2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manuf 19,661 19,661 24,965 27.0%NAICS SERVICES (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 333 Machinery Manufacturing 14,242 14,242 12,890 -9.5%51*Information 481,043 481,043 396,353 -17.6% 334 Computer and Electronic Produc 16,776 16,776 10,260 -38.8%52*Finance and Insurance 65,518 65,518 53,291 b -18.7% 335 Electric Equipment, Appliances 780 780 426 -45.4%53*Real Estate, Rental, Leasing 303,750 303,750 326,259 7.4% 336 Transportation Equipment Man 362,149 362,149 187,175 a -48.3%541 Professional, Scientific, Tech 174,718 174,718 173,274 -0.8% 337 Furniture and Related Products 13,135 13,135 18,721 42.5%551 Company Management 351 351 16 -95.5% 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 25,531 25,531 25,368 -0.6%56*Admin. Supp., Remed Svcs 294,603 294,603 334,354 13.5% TOTAL MANUFACTURING 582,858$ 582,858$ 404,712$ -30.6%611 Educational Services 52,563 52,563 53,672 2.1% Overall Change from Previous Year (178,146)$ 62*Health Care Social Assistance 40,737 40,737 114,833 181.9% 71*Arts and Entertainment 148,629 148,629 153,417 3.2% 72*Accomodation and Food Svcs 838,924 838,924 920,556 9.7% 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 81*Other Services 389,241 389,241 388,279 -0.2% NAICS TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 92*Public Administration 92,163 92,163 142,188 54.3% 481 Air Transportation 24 24 - -100.0%TOTAL SERVICES 2,882,241$ 2,882,241$ 3,056,492$ 6.0% 482 Rail Transportation 17,831 17,831 19,182 7.6%Overall Change from Previous Year 174,251$ 484 Truck Transportation 36,261 36,261 10,245 -71.7% 485 Transit and Ground Passengers 68 68 268 292.1% 488 Transportation Support 18,083 18,083 18,841 4.2%2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD 491 Postal Service 202 202 470 132.2%NAICS MISCELLANEOUS (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 492 Couriers and Messengers 1,492 1,492 568 -61.9%000 Unknown 1,958 1,958 1 -99.9% 493 Warehousing and Storage 3,121 3,121 5,376 72.2%111-115 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 7,355 7,355 2,868 -61.0% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 77,083$ 77,083$ 54,952$ -28.7%211-221 Mining & Utilities 21,830 21,830 30,229 38.5% Overall Change from Previous Year (22,131)$ 999 Unclassifiable Establishments 192,496 192,496 27,601 -85.7% TOTAL SERVICES 223,639$ 223,639$ 60,699$ -72.9% Overall Change from Previous Year (162,940)$ 2011 Annual Total 2011 YTD 2012 YTD YTD NAICS WHOLESALE TRADE (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Oct'11)(Nov '11-Oct'12)% Diff 423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 1,095,905 1,095,905 1,137,932 3.8%GRAND TOTAL 12,887,267$ 12,887,267$ 13,037,326$ 424 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable 150,480 150,480 153,721 2.2%Overall Change from Previous Year 150,058$ 1.2% 425 Wholesale Electronic Markets 13,698 13,698 5,065 -63.0% TOTAL WHOLESALE 1,260,083$ 1,260,083$ 1,296,718$ 2.9% Overall Change from Previous Year 36,635$ a. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Nov 2011 (adjustment: -$73,971). b. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Dec 2011 (adjustment: -$20,014). 12/27/12 file:Monthly Sales Tax Report.xls Prepared by Auburn Finance Department 19DI.B Page 158 of 339 Investment Purchase Purchase Maturity Yield to Type Date Price Date Maturity State Investment Pool Various 80,248,588$ Various 0.24% KeyBank Money Market Various 10,342,061 Various 0.15% US Treasury 05/04/1990 57,750 05/15/2016 5.72% Total Cash & Investments 90,648,400$ 0.229% Investment Mix % of Total State Investment Pool 88.5%Current 6-month treasury rate 0.12% KeyBank Money Market 11.4%Current State Pool rate 0.24% US Treasury 0.1%KeyBank Money Market 0.15% Blended Auburn rate 0.23% 100.0% City of Auburn Investment Portfolio Summary December 31, 2012 Summary 20DI.B Page 159 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6456 Date: February 12, 2013 Department: Finance Attachments: Memo Ordinance No. 6456 Schedule A Schedule B Budget Impact: $18,535,875.16 Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6456 Background Summary: Ordinance No. 6456 (Budget Amendment #1) amends the 2013-2014 Adopted Budget as presented in the attached transmittal memorandum and supporting attachments. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 160 of 339 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director CC: Pete Lewis, Mayor Date: February 12, 2013 Re: Ordinance #6456 – 2013-2014 Budget Amendment #1 This amendment is the first budget amendment for the 2013-2014 biennium. Proposed amendments to the 2013 budget are as follows: Carryforward of unspent capital project spending authority from 2012. This amendment enables the completion of various capital projects in 2013 by carrying forward unspent project resources at the end of 2012. Significant projects requested to be carried forward include: - General Fund: Human Services and Community Service projects - Arterial Street Fund: M Street Underpass; Citywide Guardrail Improvements; Auburn Way South Fir to Hemlock roadway improvements - Local Street Fund: Citywide local street pavement reconstruction projects - Arterial Street Preservation Fund: Citywide pavement patching and chip sealing - Municipal Park Construction Fund: Lea Hill Park Improvements; Fenster Levee Setback - General Capital Construction Fund: City Hall Remodel and HVAC Upgrade - Local Revitalization Fund: City Hall Plaza and Downtown Pedestrian Lighting and Kiosks - Water Utility: Well 1 Improvements, Auburn Way S. Dogwood to Fir - Sewer Utility: Sewer Pump Station Improvements, SCADA Improvements - Stormwater Utility: Auburn Way South Flooding - Innovation and Technology Fund: Citywide technology system maintenance and upgrades Salary and Benefit Adjustments – Nonaffiliated employees. This amendment allocates funds to reflect revised salaries and benefits consistent with Council approved adjustments. These include termination of the 40-hour furlough policy and 2013 cost-of-living adjustments. The cost of this amendment is approximately $400,000 in the General Fund and $200,000 in all other funds. Funding will be from available ending 2012 fund resources. Establish Sewer Metro Wastewater Fund This amendment moves $14.0 million in budgeted Metro wastewater revenues and expenses from the Sewer Fund to the Sewer Metro Wastewater Fund. By separately accounting for Metro wastewater revenues and expenses, it will provide greater visibility and accountability to the m anagement of payments to King County. DI.D Page 161 of 339 Staffing and Contract Labor Increases. This amendment also includes the following requested adjustments to FTEs: - Economic Development Planner: Authorizes a new 1.0FTE Economic Development Planner to support citywide economic development efforts. The function of this position has historically been provided under contract. Funding for this request ($118,600) will be from the General Fund. - Emergency Management: Increases Office Assistant from .6FTE to 1.0FTE to support emergency management workload. The cost of this position ($51,000) will be fund 30% by the General Fund with the remaining 70% funded by the water, sewer, and stormwater funds. Future grant funding may be available to offset the cost of this position. - Museum Contract Labor: Authorizes funding for continued contract funding of a Museum Curator of Collections to provide educational outreach and public program support. Funding for this request ($48,000) will be from the General Fund. Revenue Adjustments. - Sales Taxes: This amendment adjusts 2013 estimated sales taxes upward to $13,169,556 (vs budget of $12,755,116) recognizing the higher than expected 2012 collections of $13,039,174. Local and regional sales tax activity continues to improve with the regional/national economies. - Probation: Under the City’s court contract with King County District Court, probation revenues are received and retained by the County. This amendment eliminates $202,005 in budgeted probation revenues consistent with the court contract. The following table summarizes the current and revised budget as a result of this amendment. Table 1: 2013 Budget as Amended 2013 Approved Budget $ 226,354,994.00 Budget Amendment #1 (Ord #6456) 18,535,875.16 Budget as Amended $ 244,890,869.16 Attachments:  1. Proposed Ordinance #6456 (budget adjustment #1)  2. Summary of proposed 2013 budget adjustments by fund and department (Schedule A)  3. Summary of approved changes to adopted 2013 budget by fund (Schedule B) DI.D Page 162 of 339 ------------------------- Ordinance No. 6456 February 12, 2013 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6456 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6432, THE 2013-2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF AUBURN 2013-2014 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE “A” AND SCHEDULE “B” WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 3, 2012, adopted Ordinance No. 6432 which adopted the City of Auburn 2013-2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional funds to the various funds of the 2013 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA#1); and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment of the 2013-2014 Biennial Budget. The 2013- 2014 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts shown on said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B”. A copy of said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B” is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection. DI.D Page 163 of 339 ------------------------- Ordinance No. 6456 February 12, 2013 Page 2 of 3 Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other person or circumstance shall not be affected. Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. DI.D Page 164 of 339 ------------------------- Ordinance No. 6456 February 12, 2013 Page 3 of 3 INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ ____________________________ PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Danielle E. Daskam City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Daniel B. Heid City Attorney PUBLISHED:__________________ DI.D Page 165 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 General Fund (#001)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance General Fund 2013 Adopted Budget 12,108,801.00 50,570,748.00 54,368,539.00 8,311,010.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Revenues Adjust sales tax 2013 forecast 0.00 414,440.00 0.00 414,440.00 Eliminate Probation Revenues 0.00 -202,005.00 0.00 -202,005.00 Planning New 1.0FTE Economic Dev. Planner (formerly contract labor)0.00 0.00 118,550.00 -118,550.00 Carryforward: Human and Community Services contracts 58,651.00 0.00 58,651.00 0.00 Parks Continue Contract Labor Museum Curator of Collections 0.00 0.00 47,750.00 -47,750.00 Centennial Viewpoint Park art replacement 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 -22,000.00 (insurance settlement) Carryforward: Parks and Open Space Master Plan 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 Zipline for 2013 4th of July celebration; funded from prior year 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 -4,000.00 NW Parks Foundation donation Police Target Zero state DUI grant 0.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 0.00 Public Works - Emergency Management Increase Office Assistant from .6FTE to 1.0FTE (30% GF)0.00 0.00 15,225.00 -15,225.00 Public Works Carryforward: W.Valley Hwy and 15th St SW signal 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 repairs (MS1203) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment Planning 0.00 0.00 96,600.67 -96,600.67 Public Works 0.00 0.00 78,597.48 -78,597.48 Parks 0.00 0.00 74,032.41 -74,032.41 Legal 0.00 0.00 41,188.19 -41,188.19 Human Resources 0.00 0.00 31,673.48 -31,673.48 Finance 0.00 0.00 28,111.78 -28,111.78 Police 0.00 0.00 20,829.22 -20,829.22 Mayor 0.00 0.00 19,232.96 -19,232.96DI.D Page 166 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Streets 0.00 0.00 5,659.35 -5,659.35 BA#1 Total 133,651.00 225,435.00 750,101.54 -391,015.54 2013 Revised Budget 12,242,452.00 50,796,183.00 55,118,640.54 7,919,994.46 Total Resources / Expenditures 63,038,635.00 63,038,635.00 Arterial Street Fund (#102)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 1,300,518.00 13,120,070.00 13,564,224.00 856,364.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Citywide Guardrail Improvements (CP0912); New Grants 0.00 502,275.00 502,275.00 0.00 Carryforward projects: AWS Fir to Hemlock (CP1119)499,442.00 0.00 499,442.00 0.00 AWS & M St SE (CP1024); partly funded by state grants 61,186.00 134,043.00 195,229.00 0.00 A St NW Phase 1 (C207a0); partly funded by federal grants 57,514.00 132,713.00 190,227.00 0.00 ($96K) and Multicare contribution ($36K) 8th St & 104th U-Turn (CP1104); funded by REET2 0.00 180,959.87 180,959.87 0.00 transfer from Fund #328 ($44K), Federal Grant ($100K) and impact fee revenues ($37K) 49th St NE Culvert (CP1217)134,717.00 0.00 134,717.00 0.00 S. 272nd / 277th St Corridor Improvements (C222a0)92,225.00 0.00 92,225.00 0.00 AWS Dogwood to Fir (CP1118); partly funded by State grant 54,876.00 18,600.00 73,476.00 0.00 2012 Pavement Patching/Chip Seal (CP1206)60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 S 277th St Wetland Mitigation (C410a0)25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety (CP1222); funded by REET2 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 transfer from Fund #328 W. Valley Hwy Improvements (CP0916)11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.00 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School (CP1120)9,362.00 0.00 9,362.00 0.00 AWS Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood (CP1218); reduce 0.00 0.00 -2,738.00 2,738.00 budget to match grant funding received M St Underpass (C201a0); net reduction to reflect reduction 330,716.00 -798,924.00 -468,208.00 0.00 in grant funding and increase in PWTF loan BA#1 Total 1,336,038.00 194,666.87 1,527,966.87 2,738.00 2013 Revised Budget 2,636,556.00 13,314,736.87 15,092,190.87 859,102.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 15,951,292.87 15,951,292.87 DI.D Page 167 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Local Street Fund (#103)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 1,117,320.00 1,627,600.00 2,474,250.00 270,670.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Carryforward: 2012 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction (CP1201) for 390,000.00 0.00 390,000.00 0.00 continued pavement reconstruction in 2013 (CP1224) BA#1 Total 390,000.00 0.00 390,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 1,507,320.00 1,627,600.00 2,864,250.00 270,670.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 3,134,920.00 3,134,920.00 Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 1,654,369.00 2,561,488.00 2,630,920.00 1,584,937.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Carryforward projects: Pavement Patching & Chipseal (CP1206)60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 BA#1 Total 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 1,714,369.00 2,561,488.00 2,690,920.00 1,584,937.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,275,857.00 4,275,857.00 DI.D Page 168 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Municipal Park Construction Fund (#321)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 613,497.00 1,216,770.00 1,505,000.00 325,267.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Carryforward projects: Lea Hill Park Improvements (CP1003)626,025.00 0.00 626,025.00 0.00 Fenster Levee Setback (CP1016); funded from grants 0.00 449,000.00 449,000.00 0.00 Community Center Planning (transf in from F328)0.00 28,296.50 28,296.50 0.00 BA#1 Total 626,025.00 477,296.50 1,103,321.50 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 1,239,522.00 1,694,066.50 2,608,321.50 325,267.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 2,933,588.50 2,933,588.50 Capital Improvements Fund (#328)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 5,268,537.00 1,551,487.00 2,053,720.00 4,766,304.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Carryforward projects: City Hall Remodel (CP1009)438,428.00 0.00 438,428.00 0.00 City Hall HVAC equipment (transfer in from F505)0.00 109,734.00 109,734.00 0.00 City Hall HVAC capital (CP0716)80,819.00 0.00 80,819.00 0.00 Sidewalk Repair (CP1301)60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 8th St NE & C St NW ITS Improvements (CP1226)50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 Lea Hill Park (CP1214)10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Traffic Signal Battery Backup & Generator (CP1220)8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 Transfers from Fund 328 to following projects: 8th St & 104th U Turn (CP1104) in Fund 102; REET2 funds 0.00 0.00 44,000.00 -44,000.00 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety (CP1222) in Fund 102; REET2 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 -25,000.00 Carryforward: Comm. Center Planning (transfer to Fund 321)28,296.50 0.00 28,296.50 0.00 BA#1 Total 675,543.50 109,734.00 854,277.50 -69,000.00 2013 Revised Budget 5,944,080.50 1,661,221.00 2,907,997.50 4,697,304.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 7,605,301.50 7,605,301.50 DI.D Page 169 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Local Revitalization Fund (#330)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Carryforward projects: City Hall Plaza (CP1115)460,090.00 0.00 460,090.00 0.00 S. Division Street Promenade (CP1005)94,330.00 0.00 94,330.00 0.00 Downtown Pedestrian Kiosks (CP0616)48,627.00 61,000.00 109,627.00 0.00 Downtown Pedestrian Lighting (CP1116)3,928.89 0.00 3,928.89 0.00 BA#1 Total 606,975.89 61,000.00 667,975.89 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 606,975.89 61,000.00 667,975.89 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 667,975.89 667,975.89 Water Fund (#430)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 2,983,426.00 23,051,704.00 19,416,148.00 6,618,982.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Increase Emergency Management Office Assistant 0.00 0.00 20,300.00 -20,300.00 From 0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE (40% Water) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 63,127.07 -63,127.07 Carryforward projects: Academy Booster Pump Station (CP0909)2,852,970.00 0.00 2,852,970.00 0.00 Well 1 Improvements (CP0915)1,075,180.00 0.00 1,075,180.00 0.00 Fulmer Well Field Improvements (CP1107)703,803.00 0.00 703,803.00 0.00 SCADA System Improvements (C524a0)526,406.00 0.00 526,406.00 0.00 Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6 (CP1006)302,814.00 0.00 302,814.00 0.00 132nd Ave SE Tacoma Pipeline Intertie (CP1103)282,407.00 0.00 282,407.00 0.00 Lakeland Hills Booster Pump Station (CP0909)269,033.00 0.00 269,033.00 0.00 Hydraulic modeling (O&M expense)165,859.72 0.00 165,859.72 0.00 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction (CP1121)162,716.00 0.00 162,716.00 0.00 DI.D Page 170 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Street Utility Improvements (bud430)100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Valley AC Main Replacement (CP1219)87,762.00 0.00 87,762.00 0.00 Meter and Utlity Billing Improvements (O&M expense)44,349.68 0.00 44,349.68 0.00 A Street NW Corridor (C207a0)41,123.00 0.00 41,123.00 0.00 D Str. Utility Improvements (CP1207)32,826.00 0.00 32,826.00 0.00 Reservoir 4A and 4B cleaning (O&M Expense)18,400.00 0.00 18,400.00 0.00 Water Comp Plan Update (CP0704)3,827.00 0.00 3,827.00 0.00 Well 4 Power and Chlorination (C512a0)2,691.00 0.00 2,691.00 0.00 BA#1 Total 6,672,167.40 0.00 6,755,594.47 -83,427.07 2013 Revised Budget 9,655,593.40 23,051,704.00 26,171,742.47 6,535,554.93 Total Resources / Expenditures 32,707,297.40 32,707,297.40 Sewer Fund (#431)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 8,899,265.00 20,903,571.00 22,226,119.00 7,576,717.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Increase Emergency Management Office Assistant 0.00 0.00 7,612.50 -7,612.50 From 0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE (15% Sewer) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 47,970.85 -47,970.85 Move Metro Wastewater Revenues and Payments to 0.00 -14,000,000.00 -14,000,000.00 0.00 Fund #433; To track Metro Wastewater Revenues and Payments to King County Carryforward projects: Sewer Pump Station Improvements (CP1208)525,982.00 0.00 525,982.00 0.00 SCADA System Improvements (C524a0)376,075.00 0.00 376,075.00 0.00 D St. Utility Improvements (CP1207)337,190.00 0.00 337,190.00 0.00 Sewer Pump Station Repair (Ellingson & Dogwood (CP0817)100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Sewer Repair and Replacements (CP0921)40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 BA#1 Total 1,379,247.00 -14,000,000.00 -12,565,169.65 -55,583.35 2013 Revised Budget 10,278,512.00 6,903,571.00 9,668,561.85 7,513,521.15 Total Resources / Expenditures 17,182,083.00 17,182,083.00 DI.D Page 171 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Storm Drainage Fund (#432)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 6,057,392.00 13,564,424.00 13,322,702.00 6,299,114.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Increase Emergency Management Office Assistant 0.00 0.00 7,612.50 -7,612.50 From 0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE (Funding: 15% Storm) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 59,062.44 -59,062.44 Carryforward projects: Well 1 Improvements (CP0915)830,005.00 0.00 830,005.00 0.00 Mill Creek Wetland 5K Restoration (CP0746)750,000.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 D St. Utilities Improvement (CP1207)582,986.00 0.00 582,986.00 0.00 2011 Citywide Storm Pond Cleaning (CP1108)323,511.00 0.00 323,511.00 0.00 2011 Storm Repair and Replacement (CP1109)271,390.00 0.00 271,390.00 0.00 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1 (CP1122)242,588.00 0.00 242,588.00 0.00 2011 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction (CP1121)210,455.00 0.00 210,455.00 0.00 Pipeline Repair and Replacement (rep432)161,870.00 0.00 161,870.00 0.00 White River Storm Pump Station Repl (CP0817)147,187.00 0.00 147,187.00 0.00 SCADA System Improvements (C524a0)137,020.00 0.00 137,020.00 0.00 Street Utility Improvements (bud432)108,500.00 0.00 108,500.00 0.00 Flood Control Barrier Removal (EM0902)100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 A St NW Extension (C207a0)12,500.00 0.00 12,500.00 0.00 2010 Local St Pavement Preservation (CP1002)11,790.00 0.00 11,790.00 0.00 2012 Local street Pavement Reconstruction (CP1201)3,673.00 0.00 3,673.00 0.00 BA#1 Total 3,893,475.00 0.00 3,960,149.94 -66,674.94 2013 Revised Budget 9,950,867.00 13,564,424.00 17,282,851.94 6,232,439.06 Total Resources / Expenditures 23,515,291.00 23,515,291.00 DI.D Page 172 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Sewer Metro Fund (#433)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Establish budget for Sewer Metro Fund #433 0.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 0.00 To track Metro Wastewater Revenues and Payments to King County; budget moved from City Sewer Fund #431 BA#1 Total 0.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 0.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 Solid Waste Fund (#434)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 725,294.00 11,954,270.00 12,083,202.00 596,362.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 13,701.54 -13,701.54 Adjust Solid Waste revenues and expenses 0.00 825,000.00 235,200.00 589,800.00 Adjust budgeted revenues and expenses for King County tipping fee increase from $109.00 to $120.00 and revised Solid Waste rates per Ord 6438 BA#1 Total 0.00 825,000.00 248,901.54 576,098.46 2013 Revised Budget 725,294.00 12,779,270.00 12,332,103.54 1,172,460.46 Total Resources / Expenditures 13,504,564.00 13,504,564.00 DI.D Page 173 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Airport Fund (#435)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 727,073.00 724,880.00 907,801.00 544,152.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 894.54 -894.54 Carryforward projects: Taxiway Realignment and Runway Lighting (CP0720)86,346.00 0.00 86,346.00 0.00 Asphalt Repair/Sealing; Storm Catch basin repairs;59,500.00 0.00 59,500.00 0.00 Hangar repairs/maintenance BA#1 Total 145,846.00 0.00 145,846.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 872,919.00 724,880.00 1,054,541.54 543,257.46 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,597,799.00 1,597,799.00 Cemetery Fund (#436)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 13,406.00 1,049,010.00 1,003,564.00 58,852.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Increase Cemetery Revenues 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 Additional revenue associated with revising Endowed Care fund contribution from 15% to 10% (Ord 6447 and Res 4886) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 7,945.92 -7,945.92 BA#1 Total 0.00 30,000.00 7,945.92 22,054.08 2013 Revised Budget 13,406.00 1,079,010.00 1,011,509.92 80,906.08 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,092,416.00 1,092,416.00 DI.D Page 174 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Golf Course Fund (#437)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 105,984.00 1,505,680.00 1,520,530.00 91,134.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 5,426.88 -5,426.88 BA#1 Total 0.00 0.00 5,426.88 -5,426.88 2013 Revised Budget 105,984.00 1,505,680.00 1,525,956.88 85,707.12 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,611,664.00 1,611,664.00 Facilities Fund (#505)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 973,149.00 3,590,100.00 3,591,246.00 972,003.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 12,092.28 -12,092.28 Carryforward projects: City Hall HVAC equipment (transfer to F328)109,734.00 0.00 109,734.00 0.00 City Hall HVAC upgrades (O&M expense)8,200.00 0.00 8,200.00 0.00 Justice Center HVAC upgrades (O&M expense)2,740.00 0.00 2,740.00 0.00 Technical adj: Stratford lot parking costs 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 -12,000.00 Technical adj: Sound Transit garage security 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 -10,000.00 BA#1 Total 120,674.00 0.00 154,766.28 -34,092.28 2013 Revised Budget 1,093,823.00 3,590,100.00 3,746,012.28 937,910.72 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,683,923.00 4,683,923.00 DI.D Page 175 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Innovation and Technology Fund (#518)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 2,038,367.00 5,199,614.00 5,316,411.00 1,921,570.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 61,358.66 -61,358.66 Carryforward projects: City Hall Councilchambers Audio/Visual 240,000.00 0.00 240,000.00 0.00 Electronic Plan Review Program 80,000.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.00 Springbrook Upgrade to v7 65,000.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00 Spillman Superforms 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 Irrigation Central Computer 38,000.00 0.00 38,000.00 0.00 Records Management 34,000.00 0.00 34,000.00 0.00 CRW upgrade 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 Infrastructure Installs 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 Telestaff Sybase to Microsoft SQL 12,800.00 0.00 12,800.00 0.00 Cartegraph Software Enhancements 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 Online Timekeeping/TOPS 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 0.00 BA#1 Total 589,100.00 0.00 650,458.66 -61,358.66 2013 Revised Budget 2,627,467.00 5,199,614.00 5,966,869.66 1,860,211.34 Total Resources / Expenditures 7,827,081.00 7,827,081.00 Equipment Rental Fund (#550)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 4,511,304.00 3,113,450.00 4,389,664.00 3,235,090.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 9,375.66 -9,375.66 BA#1 Total 0.00 0.00 9,375.66 -9,375.66 2013 Revised Budget 4,511,304.00 3,113,450.00 4,399,039.66 3,225,714.34 Total Resources / Expenditures 7,624,754.00 7,624,754.00 DI.D Page 176 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Fire Pension Fund (#611)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 2,590,285.00 73,000.00 180,499.00 2,482,786.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Non-Affiliated Furlough and COLA Adjustment 0.00 0.00 385.75 -385.75 BA#1 Total 0.00 0.00 385.75 -385.75 2013 Revised Budget 2,590,285.00 73,000.00 180,884.75 2,482,400.25 Total Resources / Expenditures 2,663,285.00 2,663,285.00 Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701)Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 1,499,220.00 137,251.00 1,547,220.00 89,251.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456) Endowed Care Fund contribution adjustment Adjust Endowment Care contribution from 15% to 0.00 -16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 10% consistent with Ord 6447 and Res 4886 BA#1 Total 0.00 -16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 2013 Revised Budget 1,499,220.00 121,251.00 1,547,220.00 73,251.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,620,471.00 1,620,471.00 DI.D Page 177 of 339 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #1 Ordinance 6456 Grand Total - All Funds Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget 65,991,226.00 160,363,768.00 168,557,536.00 57,797,458.00 BA#1 (Proposed Ordinance #6456)16,628,742.79 1,907,132.37 18,727,324.75 -191,449.59 2013 Revised Budget 82,619,968.79 162,270,900.37 187,284,860.75 57,606,008.41 Total Resources / Expenditures 244,890,869.16 244,890,869.16 February 12, 2013 Prepared by City of Auburn Financial Planning Department F:\Budget Directory\2013 Budget\Amendments\BA#1\Budget Adjustments Summary DI.D Page 178 of 339 Sc h e d u l e B 20 1 3 A p p r o p r i a t i o n s b y F u n d 20 1 3 A p p r o p r i a t i o n A u t h o r i t y b y F u n d Fu n d 2 0 1 3 A d o p t e d Bu d g e t B A # 1 (O r d 6 4 5 6 ) T o t a l Am e n d m e n t s 2 0 1 3 R e v i s e d Bu d g e t Ge n e r a l F u n d ( # 0 0 1 ) 62 , 6 7 9 , 5 4 9 . 0 0 3 5 9 , 0 8 6 . 0 0 3 5 9 , 0 8 6 . 0 0 6 3 , 0 3 8 , 6 3 5 . 0 0 Ar t e r i a l S t r e e t F u n d ( # 1 0 2 ) 14 , 4 2 0 , 5 8 8 . 0 0 1 , 5 3 0 , 7 0 4 . 8 7 1 , 5 3 0 , 7 0 4 . 8 7 1 5 , 9 5 1 , 2 9 2 . 8 7 Lo c a l S t r e e t F u n d ( # 1 0 3 ) 2, 7 4 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 3 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 1 3 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 Ho t e l M o t e l F u n d ( # 1 0 4 ) 17 1 , 1 8 1 . 0 0 - - 1 7 1 , 1 8 1 . 0 0 Ar t e r i a l S t r e e t P r e s e r v a t i o n F u n d ( # 1 0 5 ) 4, 2 1 5 , 8 5 7 . 0 0 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 2 7 5 , 8 5 7 . 0 0 Dr u g F o r f e i t u r e F u n d ( # 1 1 7 ) 1, 2 0 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 - - 1 , 2 0 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 Ho u s i n g a n d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t G r a n t F u n d ( # 1 1 9 ) 5 0 5 , 6 4 7 . 0 0 - - 5 0 5 , 6 4 7 . 0 0 Re c r e a t i o n T r a i l s F u n d ( # 1 2 0 ) 29 , 5 7 1 . 0 0 - - 2 9 , 5 7 1 . 0 0 Bu s i n e s s I m p r o v e m e n t A r e a F u n d ( # 1 2 1 ) 76 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 - - 7 6 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 Cu m u l a t i v e R e s e r v e F u n d ( # 1 2 2 ) 7, 3 1 6 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 - - 7 , 3 1 6 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 Mi t i g a t i o n F e e s F u n d ( # 1 2 4 ) 3, 2 4 8 , 6 1 2 . 0 0 - - 3 , 2 4 8 , 6 1 2 . 0 0 19 9 8 L i b r a r y F u n d ( # 2 2 9 ) 32 6 , 6 5 4 . 0 0 - - 3 2 6 , 6 5 4 . 0 0 20 1 0 A n n e x A & B B o n d D e b t F u n d ( # 2 3 0 ) 1, 6 9 6 , 6 7 8 . 0 0 - - 1 , 6 9 6 , 6 7 8 . 0 0 20 1 0 C & D L o c a l R e v i t a l i z a t i o n D e b t F u n d ( # 2 3 1 ) 5 9 4 , 5 7 0 . 0 0 - - 5 9 4 , 5 7 0 . 0 0 LI D G u a r a n t e e F u n d ( # 2 4 9 ) 44 , 5 8 8 . 0 0 - - 4 4 , 5 8 8 . 0 0 LI D # 2 5 0 ( # 2 5 0 ) 56 , 7 4 1 . 0 0 - - 5 6 , 7 4 1 . 0 0 LI D # 3 5 0 ( # 2 7 5 ) 7, 2 4 5 . 0 0 - - 7 , 2 4 5 . 0 0 Mu n i c i p a l P a r k C o n s t r u c t i o n F u n d ( # 3 2 1 ) 1, 8 3 0 , 2 6 7 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 3 , 3 2 1 . 5 0 1 , 1 0 3 , 3 2 1 . 5 0 2 , 9 3 3 , 5 8 8 . 5 0 Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s F u n d ( # 3 2 8 ) 6, 8 2 0 , 0 2 4 . 0 0 7 8 5 , 2 7 7 . 5 0 7 8 5 , 2 7 7 . 5 0 7 , 6 0 5 , 3 0 1 . 5 0 Lo c a l R e v i t a l i z a t i o n F u n d ( # 3 3 0 ) - 6 6 7 , 9 7 5 . 8 9 6 6 7 , 9 7 5 . 8 9 6 6 7 , 9 7 5 . 8 9 Go l f C o u r s e D e b t S e r v i c e F u n d ( # 4 1 7 ) 39 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 0 - - 3 9 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 0 Wa t e r F u n d ( # 4 3 0 ) 26 , 0 3 5 , 1 3 0 . 0 0 6 , 6 7 2 , 1 6 7 . 4 0 6 , 6 7 2 , 1 6 7 . 4 0 3 2 , 7 0 7 , 2 9 7 . 4 0 Se w e r F u n d ( # 4 3 1 ) 29 , 8 0 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 0 ( 1 2 , 6 2 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 0 ) ( 1 2 , 6 2 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 0 ) 1 7 , 1 8 2 , 0 8 3 . 0 0 St o r m D r a i n a g e F u n d ( # 4 3 2 ) 19 , 6 2 1 , 8 1 6 . 0 0 3 , 8 9 3 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 3 , 8 9 3 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 2 3 , 5 1 5 , 2 9 1 . 0 0 Se w e r M e t r o F u n d ( # 4 3 3 ) - 1 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 So l i d W a s t e F u n d ( # 4 3 4 ) 12 , 6 7 9 , 5 6 4 . 0 0 8 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 , 5 0 4 , 5 6 4 . 0 0 Ai r p o r t F u n d ( # 4 3 5 ) 1, 4 5 1 , 9 5 3 . 0 0 1 4 5 , 8 4 6 . 0 0 1 4 5 , 8 4 6 . 0 0 1 , 5 9 7 , 7 9 9 . 0 0 Ce m e t e r y F u n d ( # 4 3 6 ) 1, 0 6 2 , 4 1 6 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 9 2 , 4 1 6 . 0 0 Go l f C o u r s e F u n d ( # 4 3 7 ) 1, 6 1 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 0 - - 1 , 6 1 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 0 In s u r a n c e F u n d ( # 5 0 1 ) 1, 9 8 6 , 7 7 9 . 0 0 - - 1 , 9 8 6 , 7 7 9 . 0 0 Fa c i l i t i e s F u n d ( # 5 0 5 ) 4, 5 6 3 , 2 4 9 . 0 0 1 2 0 , 6 7 4 . 0 0 1 2 0 , 6 7 4 . 0 0 4 , 6 8 3 , 9 2 3 . 0 0 In n o v a t i o n a n d T e c h n o l o g y F u n d ( # 5 1 8 ) 7, 2 3 7 , 9 8 1 . 0 0 5 8 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 8 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 8 2 7 , 0 8 1 . 0 0 Eq u i p m e n t R e n t a l F u n d ( # 5 5 0 ) 7, 6 2 4 , 7 5 4 . 0 0 - - 7 , 6 2 4 , 7 5 4 . 0 0 Fi r e P e n s i o n F u n d ( # 6 1 1 ) 2, 6 6 3 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 - - 2 , 6 6 3 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 Ce m e t e r y E n d o w m e n t F u n d ( # 7 0 1 ) 1, 6 3 6 , 4 7 1 . 0 0 ( 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ) ( 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ) 1 , 6 2 0 , 4 7 1 . 0 0 To t a l 22 6 , 3 5 4 , 9 9 4 . 0 0 1 8 , 5 3 5 , 8 7 5 . 1 6 1 8 , 5 3 5 , 8 7 5 . 1 6 2 4 4 , 8 9 0 , 8 6 9 . 1 6 DI.D Page 179 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4910 Date: February 11, 2013 Department: Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 4910 Exhibit A Vicinity Map Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Public Works Committee recommend that City Council adopt Resolution No. 4910. Background Summary: Resolution No. 4910 authorizes the Mayor to accept a federal grant in the amount of $307,550.00 administered through the Washington State Department of Transportation to finance the design and construction of the 37th Street and B Street NW Pre-Signal project. The federal grant requires a 20% match from local funding sources, which will be contributed by the 328 Fund in the amount of $76,900.00. The 37th Street and B Street NW Pre-Signal project will construct a new pre-signal, make modifications to the existing traffic signal, and install advanced railroad pre- emption for the at-grade Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail crossing intersection of 37th St NW and B St NW. This work will also mitigate the impacts from the proposed BNSF third mainline rail anticipated to be constructed in 2014. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 180 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4910 February 11, 2013 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4910 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ACCEPT A FEDERAL GRANT TO BE ADMINISTERED THROUGH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 37TH STREET AND B ST NW PRE-SIGNAL PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City desires to improve the safety and efficiency of the at-grade BNSF Railway Company crossing (“crossing”) at the intersection of 37th Street NW and B Street NW; and WHEREAS, the need for improvements at the intersection of 37th Street NW and B Street NW is recognized in Auburn’s adopted Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, installing a pre-signal at the BNSF railway crossing, thereby mitigating the impacts from the proposed BNSF third mainline rail, will improve the safety and efficiency of the at-grade crossing at the intersection of 37th Street NW and B Street NW; and WHEREAS, the City applied for, through the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), and was granted a federal grant to be administered by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) in the amount of $307,550.00 to finance the design and construction phases of the 37th St and B St NW Pre-Signal project; and WHEREAS, the federal grant requires a 20% match from local funding sources, of which $76,900.00 is available through the 328 fund; and DI.E Page 181 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4910 February 11, 2013 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to use grant monies to finance capital improvements to the transportation system. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to accept the federal grant for $307,550.00 for the 37th Street and B Street NW Pre-Signal project. In addition, the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Local Agency Agreement between the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Also, the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute any further necessary supplemental agreements for the Project, expending up to the total amount of the grant of $307,550.00. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such other administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR DI.E Page 182 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4910 February 11, 2013 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: ______________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney DI.E Page 183 of 339 Local Agency Agreement Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation By Title Date Executed By Director of Highways and Local Programs Agency Address City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 TheLocalAgencyhavingcomplied,orherebyagreeingtocomply,withthetermsandconditionssetforthin(1)Title23,U.S.CodeHighways,(2) theregulationsissuedpursuantthereto,(3)2CFR225,(4)OfficeofManagementandBudgetCircularsA-102,andA-133,(5)thepoliciesand procedurespromulgatedbytheWashingtonStateDepartment ofTransportation,and(6)thefederalaidprojectagreemententeredintobetweenthe StateandFederalGovernment,relativetotheaboveproject,theWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationwillauthorizetheLocalAgencyto proceedontheprojectbyaseparatenotification.Federalfundswhicharetobeobligatedfortheprojectmaynotexceedtheamountshownhereinon liner,column3,withoutwrittenauthoritybytheState,subjecttotheapprovaloftheFederalHighwayAdministration.Allprojectcostsnot reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency. Project Description Description of Work Name Length Termini The 37th St and B St NW Pre-Signal Project 0.06 miles 37th St NW from BNSF Railway to B St NW Type of Work Estimate of Funding (1)(2)(3) PE Right of Way Construction a. Agency b. Other d. State e. Total PE Cost Estimate (a+b+c+d) Consultant 15,000.00 37,500.00 2,500.00 55,000.00 f. Agency g. Other i. State j. Total R/W Cost Estimate (f+g+h+i) k. Contract l. Other m. Other o. Agency p. State q. Total CN Cost Estimate (k+l+m+n+o+p) r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q)55,000.00 7,500.0030,000.00 500.002,000.00 11,000.0044,000.00 Federal Funds Estimated Funds Estimated Agency Project Funds Estimated Total 1 This project consists of constructing a pre-signal for eastbound traffic and related signal modifications at B St NW, advanced railroad pre-emption, and traffic monitoring cameras. 11,000.0044,000.00 For OSC WSDOT Use Only Project No. Agreement No. 3,000.0012,000.00 CFDA No. 20.205 Federal Aid Participation Ratio for PE Federal Aid Participation Ratio for RW Federal Aid Participation Ratio for CN 80 % % % (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) Mayor h. Other c. Other n. Other DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011DI.E Page 184 of 339 Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award Method A - Advance Payment - Agency Share of total construction cost (based on contract award) Method B - Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction cost (line 4, column 2) in the amount of $at $per month formonths. Local Force or Local Ad and Award Method C - Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below. Adopted by official action on ,, Resolution/Ordinance No.4910 2 Provisions CertaintypesofworkandservicesshallbeprovidedbytheStateonthisprojectasrequestedbytheAgencyanddescribedintheTypeofWork above.Inaddition,theStatewillfurnishqualifiedpersonnelforthesupervisionandinspectionoftheworkinprogress.OnLocalAgencyadvertised andawardedprojects,thesupervisionandinspectionshall belimitedtoensuringallworkisinconformancewithapprovedplans,specifications,and federalaidrequirements.ThesalaryofsuchengineerorothersupervisorandallothersalariesandcostsincurredbyStateforcesupontheproject willbeconsideredacostthereof.AllcostsrelatedtothisprojectincurredbyemployeesoftheStateinthecustomarymanneronhighwaypayrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project. I. Scope of Work TheAgencyshallprovideallthework,labor,materials,and servicesnecessarytoperformtheprojectwhichisdescribedandsetforthindetailin the “Project Description” and “Type of Work.” WhentheStateactsforandonbehalfoftheAgency,theStateshallbedeemedanagentoftheAgencyandshallperformtheservicesdescribed andindicatedin“TypeofWork”onthefaceofthisagreement,inaccordancewithplansandspecificationsasproposedbytheAgencyandapproved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration. WhentheStateactsfortheAgencybutisnotsubjecttotherightofcontrolbytheAgency,theStateshallhavetherighttoperformthework subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration. II. Delegation of Authority TheStateiswillingtofulfilltheresponsibilitiestotheFederalGovernmentbytheadministrationofthisproject.TheAgencyagreesthattheState shallhavethefullauthoritytocarryoutthisadministration.TheStateshallreview,process,andapprovedocumentsrequiredforfederalaid reimbursementinaccordancewithfederalrequirements.If theStateadvertisesandawardsthecontract,theStatewill furtheractfortheAgencyin allmattersconcerningtheprojectasrequestedbytheAgency.IftheLocalAgencyadvertisesandawardstheproject,the Stateshallreviewthework to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications. III. Project Administration IV. Availability of Records AllprojectrecordsinsupportofallcostsincurredandactualexpenditureskeptbytheAgencyaretobemaintainedinaccordancewithlocal governmentaccountingproceduresprescribedbytheWashingtonStateAuditor’sOffice,theU.S.DepartmentofTransportation,andthe WashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation.TherecordsshallbeopentoinspectionbytheStateandFederalGovernmentatallreasonabletimes andshallberetainedandmadeavailableforsuchinspection foraperiodofnotlessthanthreeyearsfromthefinalpaymentofanyfederalaidfunds to the Agency. Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or Federal Government upon request. TheAgencyagreesthatonfederalaidhighwayconstructionprojects,thecurrentfederalaidregulationswhichapplyto liquidateddamages relativetothebasisoffederalparticipationintheprojectcostshallbeapplicableintheeventthecontractorfailstocompletethecontractwithinthe contract time. V. Compliance with Provisions TheAgencyshallnotincuranyfederalaidparticipationcostsonanyclassificationofworkonthisprojectuntilauthorizedinwritingbytheState for each classification. The classifications of work for projects are: 1. Preliminary engineering. 2. Right of way acquisition. 3. Project construction. Intheeventthatrightofwayacquisition,oractualconstructionoftheroad,forwhichpreliminaryengineeringisundertakenisnotstartedbythe closingofthetenthfiscalyearfollowingthefiscalyearin whichtheagreementisexecuted,theAgencywillrepaytothe Statethesumorsumsof federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement (see Section IX). TheAgencyagreesthatallstagesofconstructionnecessary toprovidetheinitiallyplannedcompletefacilitywithinthelimitsofthisprojectwill conformtoatleasttheminimumvaluessetbyapprovedstatewidedesignstandardsapplicabletothisclassofhighways,eventhoughsuchadditional work is financed without federal aid participation. VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement Thetotalcostoftheproject,includingallreviewandengineeringcostsandotherexpensesoftheState,istobepaidbytheAgencyandbythe FederalGovernment.Federalfundingshallbeinaccordance withtheFederalTransportationAct,asamended,2CFR225andOfficeof ManagementandBudgetcircularsA-102andA-133.TheStateshallnotbeultimatelyresponsibleforanyofthecostsofthe project.TheAgency shallbeultimatelyresponsibleforallcostsassociatedwiththeprojectwhicharenotreimbursedbytheFederalGovernment.Nothinginthis agreement shall be construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project. DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011DI.E Page 185 of 339 DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 3 TheStateshallbilltheAgencyforallcostsincurredbytheStaterelativetotheproject.TheStateshallalsobilltheAgencyforthefederalfunds paid by the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation (see Section IX). MethodA –TheAgencywillplacewiththeState,within(20)daysafter theexecutionoftheconstructioncontract,anadvanceintheamountof theAgency’sshareofthetotalconstructioncostbasedonthecontractaward.TheStatewillnotifytheAgencyoftheexactamounttobedeposited withtheState.TheStatewillpayallcostsincurredunderthecontractuponpresentationofprogressbillingsfromthecontractor.Followingsuch payments,theStatewillsubmitabillingtotheFederalGovernmentforthefederalaidparticipationshareofthecost.Whentheprojectis substantiallycompletedandfinalactualcostsoftheprojectcanbedetermined,theStatewillpresenttheAgencywitha finalbillingshowingthe amountduetheStateortheamountduetheAgency.ThisbillingwillbeclearedbyeitherapaymentfromtheAgencytotheStateorbyarefund from the State to the Agency. MethodB –TheAgency’sshareofthetotalconstructioncostasshownonthefaceofthisagreementshallbewithheldfromitsmonthlyfueltax allotments.Thefaceofthisagreementestablishesthemonthsinwhichthewithholdingshalltakeplaceandtheexactamounttobewithheldeach month.Theextentofwithholdingwillbeconfirmedbyletter fromtheStateatthetimeofcontractaward.Uponreceiptofprogressbillingsfromthe contractor, the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its participating portion of such billings. MethodC –TheAgencymaysubmitvoucherstotheStateintheformatprescribedbytheState,induplicate,notmorethanoncepermonthfor thosecostseligibleforFederalparticipationtotheextentthatsuchcostsaredirectlyattributableandproperlyallocabletothisproject.Expenditures bytheLocalAgencyformaintenance,generaladministration,supervision,andotheroverheadshallnotbeeligiblefor Federalparticipationunless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan. TheStateshallreimbursetheAgencyfortheFederalshareof eligibleprojectcostsuptotheamountshownonthefaceofthisagreement.Atthe time of audit, the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project. TheAgency,ifservicesofaconsultantarerequired,shallberesponsibleforauditoftheconsultant’srecordstodetermineeligiblefederalaid costs on the project. The report of said audit shall be in the Agency’s files and made available to the State and the Federal Government. VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts AnauditshallbeconductedbytheWSDOTInternalAuditOfficeinaccordancewithgenerallyacceptedgovernmentalauditingstandardsas issuedbytheUnitedStatesGeneralAccountingOfficebythe ComptrollerGeneraloftheUnitedStates;WSDOTManualM27-50,Consultant Authorization,Selection,andAgreementAdministration;memorandaofunderstandingbetweenWSDOTandFHWA;andOfficeofManagement and Budget Circular A-133. Ifuponaudititisfoundthatoverpaymentorparticipationoffederalmoneyinineligibleitemsofcosthasoccurred,the Agencyshallreimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation (see Section IX). TheAgencyagreesthatifpaymentorarrangementforpayment ofanyoftheState’sbillingrelativetotheproject(e.g.,Stateforcework,project cancellation,overpayment,costineligibleforfederalparticipation,etc.)isnotmadetotheStatewithin45daysaftertheAgencyhasbeenbilled,the StateshalleffectreimbursementofthetotalsumduefromtheregularmonthlyfueltaxallotmentstotheAgencyfromtheMotorVehicleFund.No additionalFederalprojectfundingwillbeapproveduntilfullpaymentisreceivedunlessotherwisedirectedtheDirectorofHighwaysandLocal Programs. IX. Payment of Billing TheAgencywillnotpermitanychangestobemadeintheprovisionsforparkingregulationsandtrafficcontrolonthisprojectwithoutprior approvaloftheStateandFederalHighwayAdministration.TheAgencywillnotinstallorpermittobeinstalledanysigns,signals,ormarkingsnot inconformancewiththestandardsapprovedbytheFederalHighwayAdministrationandMUTCD.TheAgencywill,atitsownexpense,maintain the improvement covered by this agreement. X. Traffic Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway Maintenance TheAgencyshallholdtheFederalGovernmentandtheStateharmlessfromandshallprocessanddefendatitsownexpenseallclaims,demands, or suits, whether at law or equity brought against the Agency, State, or Federal Government, arising from the Agency’s execution, XI. Indemnity TheAgency,asasubrecipientoffederalfunds,shalladhere tothefederalOfficeofManagementandBudget(OMB)CircularA-133aswellasall applicablefederalandstatestatutesandregulations.Asubrecipientwhoexpends$500,000ormoreinfederalawardsfromallsourcesduringa givenfiscalyearshallhaveasingleorprogram-specificauditperformedforthatyearinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofOMBCircularA-133. Upon conclusion of the A-133 audit, the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State. VIII. Single Audit Act TheAgencyshallbillthestateforfederalaidprojectcosts incurredinconformitywithapplicablefederalandstatelaws.Theagencyshall minimizethetimeelapsedbetweenreceiptoffederalaidfundsandsubsequentpaymentofincurredcosts.ExpendituresbytheLocalAgencyfor maintenance,generaladministration,supervision,andotheroverheadshallnotbeeligibleforfederalparticipationunlessacurrentindirectcostplan hasbeenpreparedinaccordancewiththeregulationsoutlinedin2CFR225-CostPrinciplesforState,Local,andIndianTribalGovernment,and retained for audit. TheStatewillpayforStateincurredcostsontheproject.Followingpayment,theStateshallbilltheFederalGovernmentforreimbursementof thosecostseligibleforfederalparticipationtotheextentthatsuchcostsareattributableandproperlyallocableto thisproject.TheStateshallbillthe Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government (see Section IX). 1. Project Construction Costs Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement. DI.E Page 186 of 339 No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein. TheAgencyherebyagreesthatitwillincorporateorcauseto beincorporatedintoanycontractforconstructionwork,or modificationthereof,as definedintherulesandregulationsoftheSecretaryofLaborin41CFRChapter60,whichispaidforinwholeorinpartwith fundsobtainedfrom theFederalGovernmentorborrowedonthecreditoftheFederalGovernmentpursuanttoagrant,contract,loan,insurance,orguaranteeor understandingpursuanttoanyfederalprograminvolvingsuchgrant,contract,loan,insurance,orguarantee,therequiredcontractprovisionsfor Federal-Aid Contracts (FHWA 1273), located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines. XII. Nondiscrimination Provision TheAgencyfurtheragreesthatitwillbeboundbytheaboveequalopportunityclausewithrespecttoitsownemploymentpracticeswhenit participatesinfederallyassistedconstructionwork:Provided,thatiftheapplicantsoparticipatingisaStateorLocalGovernment,theaboveequal opportunityclauseisnotapplicabletoanyagency,instrumentality,orsubdivisionofsuchgovernmentwhichdoesnotparticipateinworkonor under the contract. The Agency also agrees: (1)ToassistandcooperateactivelywiththeStateinobtainingthecomplianceofcontractorsandsubcontractorswiththeequalopportunity clause and rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (2)TofurnishtheStatesuchinformationasitmayrequireforthesupervisionofsuchcomplianceandthatitwillotherwiseassisttheStatein the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance. (3)TorefrainfromenteringintoanycontractorcontractmodificationsubjecttoExecutiveOrder11246ofSeptember24,1965,witha contractordebarredfrom,orwhohasnotdemonstratedeligibilityfor,governmentcontractsandfederallyassistedconstructioncontracts pursuant to the Executive Order. (4)Tocarryoutsuchsanctionsandpenaltiesforviolationoftheequalopportunityclauseasmaybeimposeduponcontractorsand subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration, or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, subpart D of the Executive Order. TheAgencyshallnotdiscriminateonthebasisofrace,color,nationalorigin,orsexintheawardandperformanceofanyUSDOT-assisted contractand/oragreementorintheadministrationofitsDBEprogramortherequirementsof49CFRPart26.TheAgencyshalltakeallnecessary andreasonablestepsunder49CFRPart26toensurenondiscriminationintheawardandadministrationofUSDOT-assisted contractsand agreements.TheWSDOT’sDBEprogram,asrequiredby49CFRPart26andasapprovedbyUSDOT,isincorporatedbyreferenceinthis agreement.Implementationofthisprogramisalegalobligationandfailuretocarryoutitstermsshallbetreatedasaviolationofthisagreement. UponnotificationtotheAgencyofitsfailuretocarryoutitsapprovedprogram,theDepartmentmayimposesanctionsasprovidedforunderPart26 andmay,inappropriatecases,referthematterforenforcementunder18U.S.C.1001and/ortheProgramFraudCivilRemediesActof1986(31U. S.C. 3801 et seq.). 4 TheSecretaryoftheWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationmayterminatethecontractinwhole,orfromtimetotimeinpart, whenever: XIV. Termination for Public Convenience (1) The requisite federal funding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise. (2)ThecontractorispreventedfromproceedingwiththeworkasadirectresultofanExecutiveOrderofthePresidentwithrespecttothe prosecutionofwarorintheinterestofnationaldefense,or anExecutiveOrderofthePresidentorGovernoroftheStatewithrespecttothe preservation of energy resources. (3)Thecontractorispreventedfromproceedingwiththeworkbyreasonofapreliminary,special,orpermanentrestrainingorderofa courtofcompetentjurisdictionwheretheissuanceofsuchorderisprimarilycausedbytheactsoromissionsofpersonsoragenciesotherthan the contractor. (4) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State. Fortheconvenienceofthepartiestothiscontract,itisagreedthatanyclaimsand/orcausesofactionwhichtheLocalAgencyhasagainstthe StateofWashington,growingoutofthiscontractortheprojectwithwhichitisconcerned,shallbebroughtonlyintheSuperiorCourtforThurston County. XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action Inaddition,theAgencyagreesthatifitfailsorrefusestocomplywiththeseundertakings,theStatemaytakeanyorallofthefollowing actions: (a) Cancel, terminate, or suspend this agreement in whole or in part; (b) Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency; and (c) Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. TheAgencyherebyagreesthattheliquidateddamagesprovisionsof23CFRPart635,Subpart127,assupplemented,relativetotheamountof Federalparticipationintheprojectcost,shallbeapplicableintheeventthecontractorfailstocompletethecontractwithinthecontracttime.Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in accordance with this paragraph. XIII. Liquidated Damages DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 performance,orfailuretoperformanyoftheprovisionsofthisagreement,orofanyotheragreementorcontractconnectedwiththisagreement,or arisingbyreasonoftheparticipationoftheStateorFederalGovernmentintheproject,PROVIDED,nothinghereinshall requiretheAgencyto reimbursetheStateortheFederalGovernmentfordamagesarisingoutofbodilyinjurytopersonsordamagetopropertycausedbyorresultingfrom the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State. DI.E Page 187 of 339 The approving authority certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying (1)Nofederalappropriatedfundshavebeenpaidorwillbepaid,byoronbehalfoftheundersigned,toanypersonforinfluencingorattempting toinfluenceanofficeroremployeeofanyfederalagency,amemberofCongress,anofficeroremployeeofCongress,oranemployeeofamember ofCongressinconnectionwiththeawardingofanyfederalcontract,themakingofanyfederalgrant,themakingofanyfederalloan,theentering intoofanycooperativeagreement,andtheextension,continuation,renewal,amendment,ormodificationofanyfederalcontract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. (2)Ifanyfundsotherthanfederalappropriatedfundshavebeenpaidorwillbepaidtoanypersonforinfluencingorattemptingtoinfluencean officeroremployeeofanyfederalagency,amemberofCongress,anofficeroremployeeofCongress,oranemployeeofamemberofCongressin connectionwiththisfederalcontract,grant,loan,orcooperativeagreement,theundersignedshallcompleteandsubmittheStandardForm-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (3)Theundersignedshallrequirethatthelanguageofthiscertificationbeincludedintheawarddocumentsforallsubawardsatalltiers (includingsubgrants,andcontractsandsubcontractsundergrants,subgrants,loans,andcooperativeagreements)whichexceed$100,000,andthatall such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Thiscertificationisamaterialrepresentationoffactuponwhichreliancewasplacedwhenthistransactionwasmadeor enteredinto.Submission ofthiscertificationasaprerequisiteformakingorenteringintothistransactionimposedbySection1352,Title31,U.S.Code.Anypersonwhofails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Additional Provisions 5DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011DI.E Page 188 of 339 DI.E Page 189 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4912 Date: February 12, 2013 Department: Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 4912 Exhibit A Vicinity Map Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Public Works Committee recommend that City Council adopt Resolution No. 4912. Background Summary: Resolution No. 4912 authorizes the Mayor to accept a federal grant in the amount of $560,000.00 from the Puget Sound Regional Council, to be administered through the Washington State Department of Transportation, to finance the design and construction of the West Valley Highway System Preservation project. The federal grant requires a minimum 13.5% match from local funding sources; however, the total project cost is estimated to be $1,120,000.00 so $560,000.00 has been budgeted in the 105 (Arterial/Collector Street Pavement Preservation) fund for this project. The West Valley Highway System Preservation project will overlay West Valley Highway between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW with a 2 to 3-inch layer of new asphalt pavement. This work will prevent deterioration of the existing pavement and improve the driving surface of the street. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.F AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 190 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4912 February 12, 2013 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4912 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ACCEPT A FEDERAL GRANT TO BE ADMINISTERED THROUGH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY SYSTEM PRESERVATION PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City desires to improve and preserve the pavement on West Valley Highway between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW; and WHEREAS, the need for pavement preservation improvements on West Valley Highway between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW is recognized in Auburn’s adopted Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, overlaying West Valley Highway from 15th Street NW to 37th Street NW will preserve and improve the pavement of West Valley Highway; and WHEREAS, the City applied for, through the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), and was granted a federal grant to be administered by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) in the amount of $560,000.00 to finance the design and construction phases of the West Valley Highway System Preservation Project; and WHEREAS, the federal grant requires a minimum 13.5% match from local funding sources, of which the City plans to exceed this minimum requirement and has $560,000.00 available through the 105 fund; and DI.F Page 191 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4912 February 12, 2013 Page 2 WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to use grant monies to finance capital improvements to the transportation system. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to accept the federal grant for $560,000.00 for the West Valley Highway System Improvement project. In addition, the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Local Agency Agreement between the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Also, the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute any further necessary supplemental agreements for the Project, expending up to the total amount of the grant of $560,000.00. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such other administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. DI.F Page 192 of 339 ----------------------------- Resolution No. 4912 February 12, 2013 Page 3 Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: ______________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney DI.F Page 193 of 339 Local Agency Agreement Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation By Title Date Executed By Director of Highways and Local Programs Agency Address City of Auburn 25 West Main St Auburn, WA 98001-4998 TheLocalAgencyhavingcomplied,orherebyagreeingtocomply,withthetermsandconditionssetforthin(1)Title23,U.S.CodeHighways,(2) theregulationsissuedpursuantthereto,(3)2CFR225,(4)OfficeofManagementandBudgetCircularsA-102,andA-133,(5)thepoliciesand procedurespromulgatedbytheWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation,and(6)thefederalaidprojectagreemententeredintobetweenthe StateandFederalGovernment,relativetotheaboveproject,theWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationwillauthorizetheLocalAgencyto proceedontheprojectbyaseparatenotification.Federalfundswhicharetobeobligatedfortheprojectmaynotexceedtheamountshownhereinon liner,column3,withoutwrittenauthoritybytheState,subjecttotheapprovaloftheFederalHighwayAdministration.Allprojectcostsnot reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency. Project Description Description of Work Name Length Termini West Valley Highway System Preservation 1.30 miles 15th St NW to 37th St NW Type of Work Estimate of Funding (1)(2)(3) PE Right of Way Construction a. Agency b. Other d. State e. Total PE Cost Estimate (a+b+c+d) Non-Participating 77,168.00 56,543.00 289.00 134,000.00 f. Agency g. Other i. State j. Total R/W Cost Estimate (f+g+h+i) k. Contract l. Other m. Other o. Agency p. State q. Total CN Cost Estimate (k+l+m+n+o+p) r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q)134,000.00 56,543.00 0.00 39.00 250.00 67,000.00 67,000.00 Federal Funds Estimated Funds Estimated Agency Project Funds Estimated Total 1 The West Valley Highway System Preservation project will overlay the street pavement between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW. This entails the installation of a leveling course, providing a 2”-3” thick asphalt concrete overlay, and includes minor surface utility adjustments. 67,000.0067,000.00 For OSC WSDOT Use Only Project No. Agreement No. 10,418.00 66,750.00 CFDA No. 20.205 Federal Aid Participation Ratio for PE Federal Aid Participation Ratio for RW Federal Aid Participation Ratio for CN 86.5 % % % (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) Peter B. Lewis, Mayor h. Other c. Other n. Other DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 Resolution No. 4912 EXHIBIT ADI.F Page 194 of 339 Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award Method A - Advance Payment - Agency Share of total construction cost (based on contract award) Method B - Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction cost (line 4, column 2) in the amount of $at $per month for months. Local Force or Local Ad and Award Method C - Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below. Adopted by official action on ,, Resolution/Ordinance No.4912 2 Provisions CertaintypesofworkandservicesshallbeprovidedbytheStateonthisprojectasrequestedbytheAgencyanddescribedintheTypeofWork above.Inaddition,theStatewillfurnishqualifiedpersonnelforthesupervisionandinspectionoftheworkinprogress.OnLocalAgencyadvertised andawardedprojects,thesupervisionandinspectionshallbelimitedtoensuringallworkisinconformancewithapprovedplans,specifications,and federalaidrequirements.ThesalaryofsuchengineerorothersupervisorandallothersalariesandcostsincurredbyStateforcesupontheproject willbeconsideredacostthereof.AllcostsrelatedtothisprojectincurredbyemployeesoftheStateinthecustomarymanneronhighwaypayrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project. I. Scope of Work TheAgencyshallprovideallthework,labor,materials,andservicesnecessarytoperformtheprojectwhichisdescribedandsetforthindetailin the “Project Description” and “Type of Work.” WhentheStateactsforandonbehalfoftheAgency,theStateshallbedeemedanagentoftheAgencyandshallperformtheservicesdescribed andindicatedin“TypeofWork”onthefaceofthisagreement,inaccordancewithplansandspecificationsasproposedbytheAgencyandapproved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration. WhentheStateactsfortheAgencybutisnotsubjecttotherightofcontrolbytheAgency,theStateshallhavetherighttoperformthework subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration. II. Delegation of Authority TheStateiswillingtofulfilltheresponsibilitiestotheFederalGovernmentbytheadministrationofthisproject.TheAgencyagreesthattheState shallhavethefullauthoritytocarryoutthisadministration.TheStateshallreview,process,andapprovedocumentsrequiredforfederalaid reimbursementinaccordancewithfederalrequirements.IftheStateadvertisesandawardsthecontract,theStatewillfurtheractfortheAgencyin allmattersconcerningtheprojectasrequestedbytheAgency.IftheLocalAgencyadvertisesandawardstheproject,theStateshallreviewthework to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications. III. Project Administration IV. Availability of Records AllprojectrecordsinsupportofallcostsincurredandactualexpenditureskeptbytheAgencyaretobemaintainedinaccordancewithlocal governmentaccountingproceduresprescribedbytheWashingtonStateAuditor’sOffice,theU.S.DepartmentofTransportation,andthe WashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation.TherecordsshallbeopentoinspectionbytheStateandFederalGovernmentatallreasonabletimes andshallberetainedandmadeavailableforsuchinspectionforaperiodofnotlessthanthreeyearsfromthefinalpaymentofanyfederalaidfunds to the Agency. Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or Federal Government upon request. TheAgencyagreesthatonfederalaidhighwayconstructionprojects,thecurrentfederalaidregulationswhichapplytoliquidateddamages relativetothebasisoffederalparticipationintheprojectcostshallbeapplicableintheeventthecontractorfailstocompletethecontractwithinthe contract time. V. Compliance with Provisions TheAgencyshallnotincuranyfederalaidparticipationcostsonanyclassificationofworkonthisprojectuntilauthorizedinwritingbytheState for each classification. The classifications of work for projects are: 1. Preliminary engineering. 2. Right of way acquisition. 3. Project construction. Intheeventthatrightofwayacquisition,oractualconstructionoftheroad,forwhichpreliminaryengineeringisundertakenisnotstartedbythe closingofthetenthfiscalyearfollowingthefiscalyearinwhichtheagreementisexecuted,theAgencywillrepaytotheStatethesumorsumsof federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement (see Section IX). TheAgencyagreesthatallstagesofconstructionnecessarytoprovidetheinitiallyplannedcompletefacilitywithinthelimitsofthisprojectwill conformtoatleasttheminimumvaluessetbyapprovedstatewidedesignstandardsapplicabletothisclassofhighways,eventhoughsuchadditional work is financed without federal aid participation. VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement Thetotalcostoftheproject,includingallreviewandengineeringcostsandotherexpensesoftheState,istobepaidbytheAgencyandbythe FederalGovernment.FederalfundingshallbeinaccordancewiththeFederalTransportationAct,asamended,2CFR225andOfficeof ManagementandBudgetcircularsA-102andA-133.TheStateshallnotbeultimatelyresponsibleforanyofthecostsoftheproject.TheAgency shallbeultimatelyresponsibleforallcostsassociatedwiththeprojectwhicharenotreimbursedbytheFederalGovernment.Nothinginthis agreement shall be construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project. DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 Resolution No. 4912 EXHIBIT ADI.F Page 195 of 339 DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 3 TheStateshallbilltheAgencyforallcostsincurredbytheStaterelativetotheproject.TheStateshallalsobilltheAgencyforthefederalfunds paid by the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation (see Section IX). MethodA –TheAgencywillplacewiththeState,within(20)daysaftertheexecutionoftheconstructioncontract,anadvanceintheamountof theAgency’sshareofthetotalconstructioncostbasedonthecontractaward.TheStatewillnotifytheAgencyoftheexactamounttobedeposited withtheState.TheStatewillpayallcostsincurredunderthecontractuponpresentationofprogressbillingsfromthecontractor.Followingsuch payments,theStatewillsubmitabillingtotheFederalGovernmentforthefederalaidparticipationshareofthecost.Whentheprojectis substantiallycompletedandfinalactualcostsoftheprojectcanbedetermined,theStatewillpresenttheAgencywithafinalbillingshowingthe amountduetheStateortheamountduetheAgency.ThisbillingwillbeclearedbyeitherapaymentfromtheAgencytotheStateorbyarefund from the State to the Agency. MethodB –TheAgency’sshareofthetotalconstructioncostasshownonthefaceofthisagreementshallbewithheldfromitsmonthlyfueltax allotments.Thefaceofthisagreementestablishesthemonthsinwhichthewithholdingshalltakeplaceandtheexactamounttobewithheldeach month.TheextentofwithholdingwillbeconfirmedbyletterfromtheStateatthetimeofcontractaward.Uponreceiptofprogressbillingsfromthe contractor, the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its participating portion of such billings. MethodC –TheAgencymaysubmitvoucherstotheStateintheformatprescribedbytheState,induplicate,notmorethanoncepermonthfor thosecostseligibleforFederalparticipationtotheextentthatsuchcostsaredirectlyattributableandproperlyallocabletothisproject.Expenditures bytheLocalAgencyformaintenance,generaladministration,supervision,andotheroverheadshallnotbeeligibleforFederalparticipationunless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan. TheStateshallreimbursetheAgencyfortheFederalshareofeligibleprojectcostsuptotheamountshownonthefaceofthisagreement.Atthe time of audit, the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project. TheAgency,ifservicesofaconsultantarerequired,shallberesponsibleforauditoftheconsultant’srecordstodetermineeligiblefederalaid costs on the project. The report of said audit shall be in the Agency’s files and made available to the State and the Federal Government. VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts AnauditshallbeconductedbytheWSDOTInternalAuditOfficeinaccordancewithgenerallyacceptedgovernmentalauditingstandardsas issuedbytheUnitedStatesGeneralAccountingOfficebytheComptrollerGeneraloftheUnitedStates;WSDOTManualM27-50,Consultant Authorization,Selection,andAgreementAdministration;memorandaofunderstandingbetweenWSDOTandFHWA;andOfficeofManagement and Budget Circular A-133. Ifuponaudititisfoundthatoverpaymentorparticipationoffederalmoneyinineligibleitemsofcosthasoccurred,theAgencyshallreimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation (see Section IX). TheAgencyagreesthatifpaymentorarrangementforpaymentofanyoftheState’sbillingrelativetotheproject(e.g.,Stateforcework,project cancellation,overpayment,costineligibleforfederalparticipation,etc.)isnotmadetotheStatewithin45daysaftertheAgencyhasbeenbilled,the StateshalleffectreimbursementofthetotalsumduefromtheregularmonthlyfueltaxallotmentstotheAgencyfromtheMotorVehicleFund.No additionalFederalprojectfundingwillbeapproveduntilfullpaymentisreceivedunlessotherwisedirectedtheDirectorofHighwaysandLocal Programs. IX. Payment of Billing TheAgencywillnotpermitanychangestobemadeintheprovisionsforparkingregulationsandtrafficcontrolonthisprojectwithoutprior approvaloftheStateandFederalHighwayAdministration.TheAgencywillnotinstallorpermittobeinstalledanysigns,signals,ormarkingsnot inconformancewiththestandardsapprovedbytheFederalHighwayAdministrationandMUTCD.TheAgencywill,atitsownexpense,maintain the improvement covered by this agreement. X. Traffic Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway Maintenance TheAgencyshallholdtheFederalGovernmentandtheStateharmlessfromandshallprocessanddefendatitsownexpenseallclaims,demands, or suits, whether at law or equity brought against the Agency, State, or Federal Government, arising from the Agency’s execution, XI. Indemnity TheAgency,asasubrecipientoffederalfunds,shalladheretothefederalOfficeofManagementandBudget(OMB)CircularA-133aswellasall applicablefederalandstatestatutesandregulations.Asubrecipientwhoexpends$500,000ormoreinfederalawardsfromallsourcesduringa givenfiscalyearshallhaveasingleorprogram-specificauditperformedforthatyearinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofOMBCircularA-133. Upon conclusion of the A-133 audit, the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State. VIII. Single Audit Act TheAgencyshallbillthestateforfederalaidprojectcostsincurredinconformitywithapplicablefederalandstatelaws.Theagencyshall minimizethetimeelapsedbetweenreceiptoffederalaidfundsandsubsequentpaymentofincurredcosts.ExpendituresbytheLocalAgencyfor maintenance,generaladministration,supervision,andotheroverheadshallnotbeeligibleforfederalparticipationunlessacurrentindirectcostplan hasbeenpreparedinaccordancewiththeregulationsoutlinedin2CFR225-CostPrinciplesforState,Local,andIndianTribalGovernment,and retained for audit. TheStatewillpayforStateincurredcostsontheproject.Followingpayment,theStateshallbilltheFederalGovernmentforreimbursementof thosecostseligibleforfederalparticipationtotheextentthatsuchcostsareattributableandproperlyallocabletothisproject.TheStateshallbillthe Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government (see Section IX). 1. Project Construction Costs Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement. Resolution No. 4912 EXHIBIT ADI.F Page 196 of 339 No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein. TheAgencyherebyagreesthatitwillincorporateorcausetobeincorporatedintoanycontractforconstructionwork,ormodificationthereof,as definedintherulesandregulationsoftheSecretaryofLaborin41CFRChapter60,whichispaidforinwholeorinpartwithfundsobtainedfrom theFederalGovernmentorborrowedonthecreditoftheFederalGovernmentpursuanttoagrant,contract,loan,insurance,orguaranteeor understandingpursuanttoanyfederalprograminvolvingsuchgrant,contract,loan,insurance,orguarantee,therequiredcontractprovisionsfor Federal-Aid Contracts (FHWA 1273), located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines. XII. Nondiscrimination Provision TheAgencyfurtheragreesthatitwillbeboundbytheaboveequalopportunityclausewithrespecttoitsownemploymentpracticeswhenit participatesinfederallyassistedconstructionwork:Provided,thatiftheapplicantsoparticipatingisaStateorLocalGovernment,theaboveequal opportunityclauseisnotapplicabletoanyagency,instrumentality,orsubdivisionofsuchgovernmentwhichdoesnotparticipateinworkonor under the contract. The Agency also agrees: (1)ToassistandcooperateactivelywiththeStateinobtainingthecomplianceofcontractorsandsubcontractorswiththeequalopportunity clause and rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (2)TofurnishtheStatesuchinformationasitmayrequireforthesupervisionofsuchcomplianceandthatitwillotherwiseassisttheStatein the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance. (3)TorefrainfromenteringintoanycontractorcontractmodificationsubjecttoExecutiveOrder11246ofSeptember24,1965,witha contractordebarredfrom,orwhohasnotdemonstratedeligibilityfor,governmentcontractsandfederallyassistedconstructioncontracts pursuant to the Executive Order. (4)Tocarryoutsuchsanctionsandpenaltiesforviolationoftheequalopportunityclauseasmaybeimposeduponcontractorsand subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration, or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, subpart D of the Executive Order. TheAgencyshallnotdiscriminateonthebasisofrace,color,nationalorigin,orsexintheawardandperformanceofanyUSDOT-assisted contractand/oragreementorintheadministrationofitsDBEprogramortherequirementsof49CFRPart26.TheAgencyshalltakeallnecessary andreasonablestepsunder49CFRPart26toensurenondiscriminationintheawardandadministrationofUSDOT-assistedcontractsand agreements.TheWSDOT’sDBEprogram,asrequiredby49CFRPart26andasapprovedbyUSDOT,isincorporatedbyreferenceinthis agreement.Implementationofthisprogramisalegalobligationandfailuretocarryoutitstermsshallbetreatedasaviolationofthisagreement. UponnotificationtotheAgencyofitsfailuretocarryoutitsapprovedprogram,theDepartmentmayimposesanctionsasprovidedforunderPart26 andmay,inappropriatecases,referthematterforenforcementunder18U.S.C.1001and/ortheProgramFraudCivilRemediesActof1986(31U. S.C. 3801 et seq.). 4 TheSecretaryoftheWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationmayterminatethecontractinwhole,orfromtimetotimeinpart, whenever: XIV. Termination for Public Convenience (1) The requisite federal funding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise. (2)ThecontractorispreventedfromproceedingwiththeworkasadirectresultofanExecutiveOrderofthePresidentwithrespecttothe prosecutionofwarorintheinterestofnationaldefense,oranExecutiveOrderofthePresidentorGovernoroftheStatewithrespecttothe preservation of energy resources. (3)Thecontractorispreventedfromproceedingwiththeworkbyreasonofapreliminary,special,orpermanentrestrainingorderofa courtofcompetentjurisdictionwheretheissuanceofsuchorderisprimarilycausedbytheactsoromissionsofpersonsoragenciesotherthan the contractor. (4) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State. Fortheconvenienceofthepartiestothiscontract,itisagreedthatanyclaimsand/orcausesofactionwhichtheLocalAgencyhasagainstthe StateofWashington,growingoutofthiscontractortheprojectwithwhichitisconcerned,shallbebroughtonlyintheSuperiorCourtforThurston County. XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action Inaddition,theAgencyagreesthatifitfailsorrefusestocomplywiththeseundertakings,theStatemaytakeanyorallofthefollowing actions: (a) Cancel, terminate, or suspend this agreement in whole or in part; (b) Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency; and (c) Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. TheAgencyherebyagreesthattheliquidateddamagesprovisionsof23CFRPart635,Subpart127,assupplemented,relativetotheamountof Federalparticipationintheprojectcost,shallbeapplicableintheeventthecontractorfailstocompletethecontractwithinthecontracttime.Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in accordance with this paragraph. XIII. Liquidated Damages DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 performance,orfailuretoperformanyoftheprovisionsofthisagreement,orofanyotheragreementorcontractconnectedwiththisagreement,or arisingbyreasonoftheparticipationoftheStateorFederalGovernmentintheproject,PROVIDED,nothinghereinshallrequiretheAgencyto reimbursetheStateortheFederalGovernmentfordamagesarisingoutofbodilyinjurytopersonsordamagetopropertycausedbyorresultingfrom the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State. Resolution No. 4912 EXHIBIT ADI.F Page 197 of 339 The approving authority certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying (1)Nofederalappropriatedfundshavebeenpaidorwillbepaid,byoronbehalfoftheundersigned,toanypersonforinfluencingorattempting toinfluenceanofficeroremployeeofanyfederalagency,amemberofCongress,anofficeroremployeeofCongress,oranemployeeofamember ofCongressinconnectionwiththeawardingofanyfederalcontract,themakingofanyfederalgrant,themakingofanyfederalloan,theentering intoofanycooperativeagreement,andtheextension,continuation,renewal,amendment,ormodificationofanyfederalcontract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. (2)Ifanyfundsotherthanfederalappropriatedfundshavebeenpaidorwillbepaidtoanypersonforinfluencingorattemptingtoinfluencean officeroremployeeofanyfederalagency,amemberofCongress,anofficeroremployeeofCongress,oranemployeeofamemberofCongressin connectionwiththisfederalcontract,grant,loan,orcooperativeagreement,theundersignedshallcompleteandsubmittheStandardForm-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (3)Theundersignedshallrequirethatthelanguageofthiscertificationbeincludedintheawarddocumentsforallsubawardsatalltiers (includingsubgrants,andcontractsandsubcontractsundergrants,subgrants,loans,andcooperativeagreements)whichexceed$100,000,andthatall such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Thiscertificationisamaterialrepresentationoffactuponwhichreliancewasplacedwhenthistransactionwasmadeorenteredinto.Submission ofthiscertificationasaprerequisiteformakingorenteringintothistransactionimposedbySection1352,Title31,U.S.Code.Anypersonwhofails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Additional Provisions 5DOTForm 140-039 EF Revised 09/2011 Resolution No. 4912 EXHIBIT ADI.F Page 198 of 339 DI.F Page 199 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4914 Date: February 12, 2013 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Resolution No. 4914 Right of Way Dedication Deed Exhibit A Exhibit B Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: The City of Auburn is the owner of real property located at 810 NE 30th Street NE between Auburn Way North and I Street NE. During recent survey work, City staff discovered that this property partially encroached on City right-of-way, specifically along a portion of the property's I Street NE frontage. Resolution No. 4914 would authorize the Mayor to execute a dedication deed dedicating a portion of the property as City right-of- way. This action will correct and remove this encroachment into the right-of-way, thereby removing any potential for a cloud on the property. Reviewed by Council Committees: Public Works Other: Legal, Planning Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.G AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.G Page 200 of 339 ---------------------------- Resolution No. 4914 2.12.13 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4914 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE DEDICATION OF A PORTION OF CITY- OWNED PROPERTY AS CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City owns property located at “I” Street NE and 30th Street NE; and WHEREAS, during a recent survey City staff discovered that the property partially encroached on City right-of-way; and WHEREAS, in order to correct the property lines, staff recommends dedicating a portion of the property as City right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Dedication Deed in substantially the form at Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated fully herein. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. DI.G Page 201 of 339 ---------------------------- Resolution No. 4914 2.12.13 Page 2 of 2 Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN ________________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney DI.G Page 202 of 339 Return Address: City of Auburn City Clerk 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Above this line reserved for recording information RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION DEED Reference # (if applicable): N/A Grantor/Borrower: City of Auburn Grantee/Assignee/Beneficiary: City of Auburn Legal Description/STR: A portion of Lot 2, City of Auburn Short Plat #SPL0001-96 recorded under recordng number #9605301424, in King County, Washington Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#: 000100-0020-05 The Grantor, City of Auburn, for and in consideration of ten dollars, and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, dedicate and convey to the Grantee, City of Auburn a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, an easement for right of way, public street and public utility purposes, to the same effect as if acquired by eminent domain under the laws of the State of Washington, the following described real property: A Right-of-Way described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS ‘A’ AND ‘B’ ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Right of Way Dedication Deed Page 1 of 5 DI.G Page 203 of 339 City of Auburn Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Date: Attest: Danielle E. Daskam, City Cler Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of King ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that on this _________ day of ____________________, 20______, personally appeared before me PETER B. LEWIS, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged that he signed and sealed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of the City, for the purposes and uses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute said document. In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at My commission expires DI.G Page 204 of 339 DI.G Page 205 of 339 DI.G Page 206 of 339 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4915 Date: February 12, 2013 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Resolution No. 4915 Attachment A Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: The City of Auburn received notification of amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies in late December 2012 for the City's consideration and possible ratification (Attachment A to the Resolution). The Metropolitan King County Council approved the amended Countywide Planning Policies on December 3, 2012. As noted in the transmittal letter, Countywide Planning Policies FW-1, Step 9, amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. The transmittal letter further states that a city will be deemed to have ratified the Countywide Planning Policies amendments unless within 90 days it takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. The transmittal letter further states that the deadline for receipt of any legislation by a local government pertaining to the amendments is March 4, 2013. The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) are required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) in Washington State and provide a countywide framework to coordinate local comprehensive plans. Originally drafted in the early 1990's, the CPPs described a vision for the county for the 1992-2012 planning period. The CPPs established a framework for the initial round of local comprehensive plans (required by GMA) that were adopted in the mid-1990s. The Countywide Planning Policies or CPPs are a series of policies that address growth management issues in King County. The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body consisting of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, other cities and towns in King County and special districts. The GMPC is charged with the creation and maintenance of the CPPs by recommending policies for adoption by the King County Council and ratification by all jurisdictions. Staff to the GMPC is working AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H Page 207 of 339 collaboratively to provide the GMPC with policies for consideration. These proposed amendments were drafted to be consistent with the Multi-County Planning Policies from Vision 2040, which was adopted by the Puget Sound Regional County General Assembly in April 2008. A key feature of VISION is the Regional Growth Strategya pattern of preferred growth in the region that modifies growth assumptions in King County by focusing growth in cities based on their size and function within the region. The strategy directs growth within the existing Urban Growth Area to maintain current rural and resource lands into the future. The CPPs will promote this pattern of growth and provide the policy basis for King County jurisdictions as they update their comprehensive plans. Also, the CPPs will support the VISION approach to strengthen ?the region's economic, social, and environmental resiliency, while enhancing our ability to cope with adverse trends, including the challenges associated with climate change. Other new topics and areas that are covered in the update of the CPPS include: a) planning for healthy communities; b) planning for a transportation system that enables safe access for all users; c) climate change; d) equity and social justice considerations. In addition, other reasons for updating the Countywide Planning Policies include revised population, housing and employment growth targets in King County and the region; and general out datedness of the current CPPs as King County and its cities near the end of the 1992- 2012 planning period. The 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee at their February 11, 2013 meeting. The Committee recommended to the full City Council on unanimous motion that the amendments be ratified. Reviewed by Council Committees: Planning And Community Development Other: Legal, Planning Councilmember:Backus Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:February 19, 2013 Item Number:DI.H AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H Page 208 of 339 _______________________ Resolution No. 4915 February 12, 2013 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4 9 1 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE AMENDMENTS TO THE KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH VISION 2040 WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became effective (Chapter 36.70A Revised Code of Washington); and WHEREAS, under federal and state law, the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has specific responsibilities for transportation and growth management planning; and WHEREAS, PSRC adopted VISION 2040 as the growth management, environmental, economic, and transportation vision for the central Puget Sound region; and WHEREAS, VISION 2040 provides a common framework for the region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Regional Economic Strategy, as well as countywide planning policies and local comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) are adopted in accordance with the state Growth Management Act, under 36.70A.210 RCW; and WHEREAS, the CPPs establish a framework for guiding development in all King County jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the City participated in the amendment process and helped develop the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies through participation in regional meetings through Sound Cities Association and the Inter- jurisdictional Team; and DI.H Page 209 of 339 _______________________ Resolution No. 4915 February 12, 2013 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies were reviewed and recommended approval by the Growth Management Planning Council; and WHEREAS, amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies must be ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified the amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County and became effective on December 13, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and renamed the 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies as shown by Attachment A to this resolution are hereby ratified by the City of Auburn. Section 2. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Clerk of the Metropolitan King County Council prior to March 4, 2013. Section 3. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and signed this _____ day of _________________, 2013. CITY OF AUBURN DI.H Page 210 of 339 _______________________ Resolution No. 4915 February 12, 2013 Page 3 of 3 _________________________ PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney DI.H Page 211 of 339 ATTACHMENT A DI.H Page 212 of 339 King County j,t f,jrili. LL ,j o:i: iil December 22, 2012 The Honorable Pete Lewis City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Dear Mayor Lewis: We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On December 3, 2012, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified the amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County The two ordinances will become effective December 23, 2012. Copies of the King County Council staff reports, ordinances and Growth Management Planning Council motion are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the CPP and amendments unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove theamendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is Monday, March 4, 2013. If you adopt any legislation concerning this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, Monday, March 4, 2013, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, Room 1200, King County Courthouse, 518 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. DI.H Page 213 of 339 If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Project/Program Manager IV, King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review, at 206-477-0345, or Rick Bautista, Metropolitan King County Council Staff, at 206-296-0329. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter Sincerely, M4r J W Larry Gossett, Chair Dow Constantine Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive j Enclosures cc: King County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association John Starbard, Director, Department of Permitting and Environment Review DPER) Paul Reitenbach, Project/Program Manager IV, DPER Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Transportation, Environment and Economy Committee (TREE) DI.H Page 214 of 339 KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 ,Third Avenue A Seattle,WA 98104 am Signature Report King County December 4, 2012 Ordinance 17486 Proposed No.2012-0282.3 Sponsors Phillips 1 AN ORDINANCE relating to adoption and ratification of 2 the King County Countywide Planning Policies; adding a i 3 new section to K.C.C. chapter 20.10,decodifying K.C.C. 4 20.10.010,K.C.C. 20.10.020, K.C.C. 20.10.030,K.C.C. 5 20.10.040,K.C.C. 20.10.050, K.C.C. 20.10.065, K.C.C. 6 20.10.075 and K.C.C.20.10.076 and repealing Ordinance as amended and K.C.C. 20.10.060.7 10450, Section 6,I 8 STATEMENT OF FACTS: 9 1 The Countywide Planning Policies ("CPPs") are adopted in accordance 10 with the state Growth Management Act,under 36.70A.210 RCW 11 2. The Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC")was formed in 12 1992 to guide the development of the CPPs. The GMPC is a 13 representative body of elected officials from King County, the city of 14 Seattle, the city of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities Association. 15 Representatives of the special districts serve as ex officio members. 16 3. The CPPs establish a framework for guiding development in all King 17 County jurisdictions. 1 DI.H Page 215 of 339 Ordinance 17486 18 4 The CPPs are deemed adopted when ratified by King County and the 19 requisite number of cities and satisfying the required population 20 percentage. 21 5. The GMPC recommends CPP amendments to the King County council 22 for consideration, possible revision and ratification. 23 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 24 SECTION 1. Findings: 25 A. On September 21,2011, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted 26 Motion 11-1 approving the 2011 King County Countywide Planning Policies. 27 B. On March 31,2012,the school siting task force issued a final report. j 28 C. On April 4, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 29 12-1 adding land on the west bank of the Duwamish river to the city of Seattle Potential 30 Annexation Area. I 31 D On June 6,2012,the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 32 12-2 implementing the recommendations of the school siting task force by adding new 33 policies and the Report of the School Siting Task Force as Appendix 5 to the Countywide 34 Planning Policies. 35 E. On June 6, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 36 12-3 adding a new housing chapter and revised housing appendix to the Countywide 37 Planning Policies. 38 F On June 6, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 39 12-4 adding land on the west side of 216th Ave SE to the city of Black Diamond 40 Potential Annexation Area. 2 DI.H Page 216 of 339 Ordinance 17486 41 G. Attachment A to this ordinance incorporates Motions 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 12-3 42 and 12-4 into the 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies. 43 SECTION 2. The amendments to the King County Countywide Planning 44 Policies,and renamed the 2012 King County Planning Policies, as shown in Attachment 45 A to this ordinance,are hereby adopted and ratified on behalf of the population of 46 unincorporated King County 47 NEW SECTION. SECTION 3. There is hereby added to K.C.C. chapter 20.10 a 48 new section to read as follows: 49 A. After the Growth Management Planning Council approves or amends the 5o Countywide Planning Policies, the executive, as its chair, shall timely transmit to the 51 King County council an ordinance adopting the Countywide Planning Policies or 52 amendments thereto. 53 B. The King County council shall refer the proposed ordinance transmitted by the 54 executive under subsection A. of this section to the committee on transportation, 55 economy and environment or its successor for review and consideration. If the King 56 County council recommends substantive revisions to the Countywide Planning Policies 57 or amendments approved by the Growth Management Planning Council, the King County 58 council may refer the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Planning Council 59 for its consideration and response. 60 C. Within ten days after the ordinance transmitted by the executive under 61 subsection A. of this section, as amended by the council, is effective, the clerk of the 62 King County council shall send the notice of enactment and the Countywide Planning 63 Policies and amendments to each city and town in King County for ratification as 3 DI.H Page 217 of 339 Ordinance 17486 64 provided for in the Countywide Planning Policies. Each city and town must take action 65 to ratify or reject the proposed Countywide Planning Policies or amendments as approved 66 by the King County council within ninety days after the date the ordinance approving the 67 Countywide Plamring Policies or amendments was enacted. Failure of a city or town to 68 take action and notify the clerk of the King County council within ninety days shall be 69 deemed to be approval by that city or town. The notice shall include the date by which 70 each city or town must respond with its response to ratify or reject the proposed 71 Countywide Planning Policies or amendments and where the response should be directed. 72 D. Countywide Planning Policies or amendments are ratified if approved by the i 73 county, cities and towns representing at least seventy percent of the county's population 74 and thirty percent of the jurisdictions. For ratification purposes, King County is the 75 jurisdiction representing the population in the unincorporated areas of the county 76 E. Within ten days after the date for response established by the clerk of the King 77 County council under subsection C. of this section, the clerk of the King County council 78 shall notify the executive, as chair of the Growth Management Planning Council,of the I 79 decision to ratify or not to ratify the Countywide Planning Policies or amendments. 80 SECTION 4. K.C.C. 20.10.010, K.C.C.20.10.020, K.C.C. 20.10.030,K.C.C. 81 20.10.040, K.C.C. 20.10.050,K.C.C. 20.10.065, K.C.C. 20.10.075 and K.C.C. 20.10.076 82 are each hereby decodified. 7 4 DI.H Page 218 of 339 i Ordinance 17486 83 SECTION 5. Ordinance 10450, Section 6, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.060 are 84 each hereby repealed. 85 Ordinance 17486 was introduced on 8/20/2012 and passed as amended by the Metropolitan King County Council on 12/3/2012, by the following vote:li Yes: 9 - Mr. Phillips,Mr. von Reichbauer,Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert,Mr. Ferguson,Mr Dunn and Mr. McDermott No: 0 Excused. 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON Larry Gossett,Chair 4, N ATTEST Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council C: T ca q r' o APPROVED this 'J day oft C:Plj 2012. Dow Constantine,County Executive Attachments:A. 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies,dated December 3,2012 5 DI.H Page 219 of 339 I 17486 i ATTACHMENT A 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies i November, 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 i i i i I DI.H Page 220 of 339 e King County Countywide Planning Policies November2011 Amended December 3, 2012 2 CONTENTS 4 VISION 2040 STATEMENT 5 VISION&FRAMEWORK. 5 Vision for King County 2030 7 Framework. 9 Framework Policies I ENVIRONMENT Environmental Sustainability 11 12 Earth and Habitat. 13 i Flood Hazards. 13 Water Resources. 14 Air Quality and Climate Change 16 DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. 1G Urban Growth Area 17 Urban Lands 18 Growth Targets. Amendments to the Urban Growth Area 21 22 Review and Evaluation Program 23 Joint Planning and Annexation. 24 Centers. 24 Urban Centers. 25 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers 26 Local Centers. Urban Design and Historic Preservation 27 Rural Area and Resource Lands 27 28 Rural Area 29 Resource Lands. 31 HOUSING Housing Inventory and Needs Analysis. 32 Strategies to Meet Housing Needs 32 34 Regional Cooperation F Measuring Results 34j 36 ECONOMY 37 0 Business Development U 38 People p Places. 38 U 2 DI.H Page 221 of 339 d King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 TRANSPORTATION 40 Supporting Growth 40 Mobility 42 System Operations. 43 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 45 Urban and Rural Levels of Service. 45 Collaboration Among Jurisdictions 45 Utilities 46 Water Supply 46 Sewage Treatment and Disposal. 47 Solid Waste. 47 Energy 48 Telecommunications. 48 Human mid Community Services 48 Siting Public Capital Facilities 49 APPENDIX 1. LAND USE MAP 50 APPENDIX 2: POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS MAP 51 APPENDIX 3: URBAN SEPARATORS MAPS 52 APPENDIX 4: HOUSING TECHNICAL APPENDIX 55 t APPENDIX 5: KING COUNTY SCHOOL SITING TASK FORCE REPORT 59 GLOSSARY 61 I I F z z0 U i~ z xU 3 DI.H Page 222 of 339 AA3 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 VISION 2040 STATEMENT The 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies were prepared to address changes to the Growth Management Act,take into account the passage of 20 years since their initial adoption, and to specifically reflect the regional direction established in VISION 2040. Vision 2040 is the product of the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC),an association of cities, towns, counties, ports,tribes, and state agencies that serves as a forum for developing policies and making decisions about regional growth management,environmental,economic,and transportation issues in the four-county central Puget Sound region of Washington state (King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties). Vision 2040's Regional Growth Strategy outlines how the four-county Puget Sound region should plan for additional population and employment growth. As made clear in the Regional Growth Strategy, all jurisdictions in King County have a role in accommodating growth, using sustainable and environmentally responsible development practices. The 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies support this strategy and provide direction at the county and jurisdiction level with appropriate specificity and detail needed to guide consistent and useable local comprehensive plans and regulations. While VISION 2040 is consistent with the overall growth management strategy of the 1992 King County Countywide Planning Policies, restructuring the Countywide Planning Policies—into the six chapters of Environment, Development Patterns, Housing, Economy,Transportation,and Public Facilities and Services—was done to match the structure of VISION 2040. F WFQF 0v0N z 0 5 a U 4 DI.H Page 223 of 339 4'We King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 VISION & FRAMEWORK Vision for Kind County 2030 It is the year 2030 and our county has changed significantly in the roughly 40 years that have elapsed since the first Countywide Planning Policies were adopted in 1992. In many ways this is a result of the successful public-private partnership that has supported a diversified, sustainable regional economy and has managed and accommodated growth while maintaining the quality of life and the natural environment throughout King County King County in 20301s characterized by Protected Critical Areas. Effective stewardship of the environment has preserved and protected the critical areas in the County, including wetlands,aquifer recharge areas,and fish and wildlife conservation areas. These critical areas continue to provide beneficial functions and values for reducing flooding, protecting water quality,supporting biodiversity, and enriching our quality of life for future generations as the as the region's population continues to grow Viable Rural Area.The Rural Area,established In 1992, is permanently protected with a clear boundary between Rural and Urban Areas. The successful protection of these lands is due in large part to continued innovation within the Urban Growth Area to create new ways to use land efficiently and sustainably In this way,there is minimal pressure to convert rural lands.The Rural Area is a viable option for those seeking a lifestyle contrast to the Urban Growth Area. The pressure to urbanize the Rural Area has also been lessened by market pressures to use the land for agriculture. Bountiful Agricultural Areas and Productive Forest Lands. More people are farming and a greater number of residents are benefiting from p King County agricultural products, which can be purchased through a network of farmers markets and farm stands throughout the county Since 2010,the j increase in productive farming in the Agricultural Production District and in the Rural Area has accelerated as more residents seek locally grown food.Thriving markets now exist throughout the county for these products.The forests of the z Pacific Northwest remain as some of the most productive in the world with large O scale commercial forestry prevalent in the eastern half of the county Vibrant,diverse and compact urban communities. Within the Urban Growth Area little undeveloped land now exists and urban U infrastructure has been extended to fully serve the entire Urban Growth Area. 5 DI.H Page 224 of 339 WJ King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Development activity is focused on redevelopment to create vibrant neighborhoods where residents can walk, bicycle or use public transit for most of their needs. Improvements to the infrastructure now focus on maintaining existing capacity as opposed to extending the infrastructure into previously unserved areas. Because of the innovations developed in public and private partnerships,there is still ample capacity to accommodate the planned population and employment growth targets within the Urban Growth Area. Much of the growth in employment and new housing occurs In the Urban Centers.These centers successfully provide a mixture of living,working,cultural, and recreational activities for all members of the community. All the centers are linked together by a high-capacity transit system, including light rail and high capacity bus transit. Transit stations and hubs are within walking distance to all parts of the center and the high capacity transit system facilitates people moving easily from one center to another Within the collection of Urban Centers there is balance between jobs and housing. Each center has developed its own successful urban character and all are noted for their livability,vibrancy, healthy environment, design,and pedestrian focus.I I smaller concentrations of businesses are distributed throughout the Urban Growth Area to provide goods and services to surrounding residential areas. Most residents are within walking distance of commercial areas,fostering a healthy community through physical exercise and a sense of neighborhood. Local transit systems provide convenient connections to the Urban Centers and elsewhere within the Urban Growth Area. Manufacturing/Industrial Centers continue to thrive and function as important hubs of the regional economy. These areas too are well served by transportation systems that emphasize the efficient movement of people,goods and information to and within Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers as well as connecting to other regions. The entire Urban Growth Area is characterized by superior urban design with an open space network that defines and separates,yet links,the various jurisdictions and central places. Countywide and regional facilities have been equitably dispersed—located where needed, sited unobtrusively—and have provided appropriate Incentives and amenities to the surrounding 3 neighborhoods. Rural Cities have created unique urban environments within the Rural Area and provide commercial services and employment opportunities for their residents.These include retail,business, educational and social services for residents both of cities and the surrounding Rural ddOAreawhileprotectingandsupportingthesurroundingRuralAreaandResourceLands. Federal,state and regional funds have been used to further this land use plan and to fund 5 needed regional facilities while local resources focus on funding local and neighborhood a facilities.The sharing of resources to accomplish common goals is done so that the regional U plan can succeed and all can benefit. DI.H Page 225 of 339 ppge King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 The economy is vibrant,vital,and sustainable, and emphasizes diversity in the range of goods and information produced and the services provided. Regional cooperation has focused on economic development activities that have retained and expanded key industries such as aerospace;software, and biotechnology while using the resources of the region to attract new business clusters such as in renewable energy. Businesses continue to locate in our county because of the high quality of life;the preservation of the natural environment;the emphasis on providing a superior education; the predictability brought about by the management of growth and the effectiveness of public-private partnerships supporting these attributes. Housing opportunities for all incomes and lifestyles exist throughout the county and with the balanced transportation system access to employment is convenient and reliable. Innovation In the development of a diverse range of housing types has been fundamental in accommodating population growth.The diversity of housing types has allowed residents to stay within their community as their housing needs change. King County communities are extraordinarily diverse culturally and this has been embraced and celebrated by the residents of King County The needs of residents are attended to by a social service system that emphasizes prevention but stands ready to respond to direct needs as well. There is a sense of social equity within our communities and all share equitably In the distribution of and access to parks, open space, and vibrant neighborhood centers. The Urban Growth Area is completely located within cities, which are the primary providers of urban services. Where appropriate,ro riate,sub-regional consortia have been created for certain services,and King County government is recognized as a significant provider of regional services as well as the coordinator of local services to the Rural Area and Resource Lands. Residents and businesses have recognized that, over time,through clear and reasonable timelines and financing commitments, issues will be addressed. Residents and businesses trust in their local governments because the plans and promises made to manage growth starting in 1992 have been followed.Change is accepted and proceeds in an orderly fashion based on the locally adopted and embraced growth management plans. O 3 Fi-amework The year 1991 was one of tremendous change for the management of growth in King County u and this environment of change gave rise to the distinctive character of the 1992 Countywide z Planning Policies.While the Countywide Planning Policies have been amended periodically to O address specific issues or revisions required by the Growth Management Act, the first thorough update of the Countywide Planning Policies was completed in 2012 to ensure that the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with VISION 2040, the Growth Management Act a and changes that had occurred in the previous twenty years within King County In addition for x the 2012 update,the Growth Management Planning Council directed that the revised policies v 7 DI.H Page 226 of 339 Me King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 include countywide direction on three new policy areas: climate change, healthy communities and social equity Understanding the history of the 1992 policies is important in order to establish the context for the revised policies. In 1991 five major conditions gave rise to the first Countywide Planning Policies and the process used in their development and adoption: I. In 1985,the King County Council adopted a Comprehensive Plan that for the first time established a clear boundary between Urban and Rural Areas and set forth standards to delineate a clear development character for each. 2. In 1991,the adoption of the Growth Management Act transformed the way that local jurisdictions looked at land use planning as well as how they interacted with neighboring jurisdictions. A fundamental requirement of the Growth Management Act was coordination between a shared countywide vision on how growth would be planned for and accommodated and how this would be implemented by local jurisdictions. in 1991,the Growth Management Act was amended to include the requirement that Countywide Planning Policies be adopted to describe this vision and how these relationships would be created.These provisions gave rise to the creation of the Growth Management Planning Council—an advisory group of elected officials from jurisdictions throughout the county charged with overseeing the preparation of the Countywide Planning jurisdictions Policies. Since the Growth Management Act was new and many j created a comprehensive plan before,the Countywide Planning Policies became a guide for jurisdictions to follow in complying with the Growth Management Act in areas as diverse as critical area regulation to local growth targets. 3. In 1991,the Puget Sound Council of Governments was dissolved and replaced with the Puget Sound Regional Council that Initially had significantly reduced responsibilities for regional land use planning and coordination. Without an effective regional body for land use planning,it was necessary for p the Puget Sound counties to identify their own process and organization for developing the Countywide Planning Policies. In the case of King County,this was the Growth Management Planning Council.Subsequently, as its responsibilities were expanded over time,the Puget Sound Regional Council wdevelopedVISION2040, the multi-county vision and planning policies that set Z the structure for these revised Countywide Planning Policies. O 4. By 1991,the Suburban Cities Association had changed from a loose coalition of cities outside of Seattle to a formal organization with the ability to represent IT constituent jurisdictions in regional forums. sU 8 DI.H Page 227 of 339 RAJJ King County Countywide Planning Policies November2011 Amended December 3, 2012 S. Prior to the development of the Countywide Planning Policies, King County and METRO attempted and failed to win electoral support for merger This defeat left jurisdictions with concerns about the relationship between city and county governments, and further confusion about the roles of governments in the Urban Growth Area. Because of these conditions and the environment they fostered,jurisdictions in King County decided to go further than just meeting the specific statutory requirements for such policies. The 1992 King County Countywide Planning Policies provided direction for many issues related to growth management and established a policy structure for subsequent issue resolution. Since their adoption, many of the initial Countywide Planning Policies have been codified into local regulations or carried out in regional or statewide arenas and no longer need to be i included in them.Through amendments to the King County Charter and interlocal agreements, the relationship between county and city governments has been clearly defined and annexations and incorporations have brought most of the unincorporated urban area into the cities. Other key actions that were required by the 1992 Countywide Planning Policies along with their current status are described below• Complete a fiscal and environmental review of the 1992 Countywide Planning Policies—completed and adopted in 1994, j Establish housing and employment targets for each jurisdiction—completed in 1994 and periodically updated pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies; Adopt local comprehensive plans pursuant to the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies—each jurisdiction within King County has an adopted plan that is periodically updated; Develop land use capacity and urban density evaluation program—developed and then superseded by the King County Buildable Lands Program as required by the Growth Management Act; Develop a growth management monitoring program —King County Benchmarks program established in 1994 and annually updated as described in policy G-2;and aEvaluatetheneedtochangetheUrbanGrowthBoundaryandworktomaintaina permanent Rural Area—established in 1994 and periodically reviewed as described in the Development Patterns chapter V. z General Policies 0 C/) Unless otherwise noted, the Countywide Planning Policies apply to the Growth Management 5 Planning Council, King County, and all of the cities within King County p U 9 DI.H Page 228 of 339 Wig King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Amendments. While much has been accomplished, the Countywide Planning Policies were never intended to be static and will require amendment over time to reflect changed conditions.While the formal policy development is done by the Growth Management Planning Council, ideas for new policies begin in a variety of areas including individual jurisdictions. Policy G-1 below describes the process for amending the Countywide Planning Policies: G--1 Maintain the currency of the Countywide Planning Policies through periodic review and amendment. Initiate and review all amendments at the Growth Management Planning Council through the process described below- a) Only the Growth Management Planning Council may propose amendments to theCountywidePlanningPoliciesexceptforamendmentstotheUrbanGrowthArea that may also be proposed by King County in accordance with policies DP-15 and DP- 16; b) Growth Management Planning Council recommends amendments to the King County Council for consideration, possible revision,and approval; proposed revisions by the King County Council that are of a substantive nature may be sent to the Growth Management Planning Council for their consideration and revised recommendation based on the proposed revision; c) A majority vote of the King County Council both constitutes approval of the amendments and ratification on behalf of the residents of Unincorporated King County., d) After approval and ratification by the King County Council, amendments are forwarded to each city and town for ratification. Amendments cannot be modified during the city ratification process;and e) Amendments must be ratified within 90 days of King County approval and require affirmation by the county and cities and towns representing at least 70 percent of the county population and 30 percent of those jurisdictions. Ratification is either by an affirmative vote of the city's or town's council or by no action being taken within the ratification period. Monitoring. Periodically evaluating the effectiveness of the Countywide Planning Policies is key o to continuing their value to the region and local jurisdictions.In 1994 King County and cities established the current Benchmarks program to monitor and evaluate key regional indicators. G-2 Monitor and benchmark the progress of the Countywide Planning Policies towards achieving the Regional Growth Strategy inclusive of the environment, development patterns, C43 housing, the economy,transportation and the provision of public services. Identify corrective Z actions to be taken if progress toward benchmarks is not being achieved. S Investment. Key to ensuring the success of the Countywide Planning Policies is investment in regional infrastructure and programs. Balancing the use of limited available funds between regional and local needs is extremely complex. U 1 DI.H Page 229 of 339 s410 Xing County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 G-3 Work collaboratively to identify and seek regional,state, and federal funding sources to invest in infrastructure, strategies, and programs to enable the full implementation of the Countywide Planning Policies. Balance needed regional investments with local needs when making funding determinations. Consistency The Countywide Planning Policies provide a common framework for local planning and each jurisdiction is required to update its comprehensive plans to be consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies. The full body of the Countywide Planning Policies is to be considered for decision-making. G-4 Adopt comprehensive plans that are consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies as required by the Growth Management Act. ENVIRONMENT Overarching Goal: The quality of the natural environment in King County is restored and I protectedfor future generations. I, Environmental Sustainability Local governments have a key role in shaping sustainable communities by integrating sustainable development and business practices with ecological, social,and economic concerns. Local governments also play a pivotal role in ensuring environmental justice by addressing environmental impacts on minority and low-Income populations and by pursuing fairness in the application of policies and regulations. EN-1 Incorporate environmental protection and restoration efforts Into local comprehensive plans to ensure that the quality of the natural environment and its contributions to human health and vitality are sustained now and for future generations. EN-2 Encourage low impact development approaches for managing stormwater, protecting z water quality, minimizing flooding and erosion, protecting habitat, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. O EN-3 Encourage the transition to a sustainable energy future by reducing demand through planning for efficiency and conservation and by meeting reduced needs from sustainable i sources. a. EN-4 Identify and preserve regionally significant open space networks in both Urban and U Rural Areas. Develop strategies and funding to protect lands that provide the following valuable functions: 1 1 DI.H Page 230 of 339 i 410 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Physical or visual separation delineating growth boundaries or providing buffers between incompatible uses; Active and passive outdoor recreation opportunities; Wildlife habitat and migration corridors that preserve and enhance ecosystem resiliency in the face of urbanization and climate change; Preservation of ecologically sensitive, scenic or cultural resources; Urban green space, habitats, and ecosystems; Forest resources;and Food production potential. EN-5 Identify and mitigate unavoidable negative impacts of public actions that disproportionately affect people of color and low-income populations. Earth and Habitat Healthy ecosystems and environments are vital to the sustainability of all plant and animal life, including humans. Protection of biodiversity in all its forms and across all landscapes is critical to continued prosperity and high quality of life in King County The value of biodiversity to sustaining long-term productivity and both economic and ecological benefits is evident in fisheries, forestry,and agriculture. For ecosystems to be healthy and provide healthful benefits to people, local governments must prevent negative human Impacts and work to ensure that this ecosystem remain diverse and productive over time. With the impending effects of climate change, maintaining biodiversity becomes even more critical to the preservation and resilience of resource-based activities and to many social and ecological systems. Protection of individual species, including Chinook salmon, also plays an important role in sustaining biodiversity and quality of life within the county Since 2000,local governments,citizens,tribes, conservation districts, non-profit groups,and federal and state fisheries managers have cooperated to develop and implement watershed-based salmon conservation plans,known as Water Resource Inventory Area plans,to conserve and restore habitat for Chinook salmon today and for future generations. EN-6 Coordinate approaches and standards for defining and protecting critical areas especially where such areas and Impacts to them cross jurisdictional boundaries. Z EN-7 Encourage basin-wide approaches to wetland protection, emphasizing preservation and enhancement of the highest quality wetlands and wetland systems. EN-8 Develop an integrated and comprehensive approach to managing fish and wildlife W habitat conservation, especially protecting endangered, threatened, and sensitive species.S x EN-9 Implement salmon habitat protection and restoration priorities in approved Water U_ Resource Inventory Area plans. 1 2 DI.H Page 231 of 339 We King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Flood Hazards i Flooding is a natural process that affects human communities and natural environments in King County Managing floodplain development and conserving aquatic habitats are the main challenges for areas affected by flooding. The King County Flood Control District exists to protect public health and safety, regional economic centers, public and private property and transportation corridors. Local governments also have responsibility for flood control within their boundaries. EN-10 Coordinate and fund flood hazard management efforts through the King County Flood Control District. EN-11 Work cooperatively to meet regulatory standards for floodplain development as these standards are updated for consistency with relevant federal requirements including those related to the Endangered Species Act. EN-12 Work cooperatively with the federal, state,and regional agencies and forums to develop regional levee maintenance standards that ensure public safety and protect habitat. Water Resources The flow and quality of water is impacted by water withdrawals, land development,stormwater management,and climate change.Since surface and ground waters do not respect political boundaries, cross-jurisdictional coordination of water is required to ensure its functions and uses are protected and sustained. The Puget Sound Partnership was created by the Washington State Legislature as the state agency with the responsibility for assuring the preservation and recovery of Puget Sound and the freshwater systems flowing into the Sound. King County plays a key role in these efforts because of its large population and its location in Central Puget Sound. EN-13 Collaborate with the Puget Sound Partnership to implement the Puget Sound Action Agenda and to coordinate land use and transportation plans and actions for the benefit of Puget Sound and its watersheds. Oct EN-14 Manage natural drainage systems to improve water quality and habitat functions, minimize erosion and sedimentation, protect public health, reduce flood risks, and moderate w c. peak storm water runoff rates. Work cooperatively among local, regional,state, national and a tribal jurisdictions to establish, monitor and enforce consistent standards for managing streams U and wetlands throughout drainage basins. 1 3 DI.H Page 232 of 339 4ig King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 EN-15 Establish a multi-jurisdictional approach for funding and monitoring water quality, quantity, biological conditions,and outcome measures and for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of monitoring efforts. Air Quality and Climate Change Greenhouse gas emissions are resulting in a changing and increasingly variable climate. King County's snow-fed water supply is especially vulnerable to a changing climate. Additionally,the patterns of storm events and river and stream flow patterns are changing and our shorelines are susceptible to rising sea levels. Carbon dioxide reacts with seawater and reduces the water's pH,threatening the food web In Puget Sound.While local governments can individually work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, more significant emission reductions can only be accomplished through countywide coordination of land use patterns and promotion of transportation systems that provide practical alternatives to single occupancy vehicles. Efficient energy consumption is both a mitigation and an adaptation strategy Local governments can improve energy efficiency through the development of new infrastructure as well as the maintenance and updating of existing infrastructure. EN-16 Plan for land use patterns and transportation systems that minimize air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, including: Maintaining or exceeding existing standards for carbon monoxide,ozone, and particulates; Directing growth to Urban Centers and other mixed use/high density locations that support mass transit, encourage non-motorized modes of travel and reduce trip lengths; Facilitating modes of travel other than single occupancy vehicles including transit, walking, bicycling,and carpooling; Incorporating energy-saving strategies in infrastructure planning and design; Encouraging new development to use low emission construction practices, low or zero net lifetime energy requirements and "green" building techniques;and Increasing the use of low emission vehicles, such as efficient electric-powered H vehicles. Z EN-17 Establish a countywide greenhouse gas reduction target that meets or exceeds the statewide reduction requirement that is stated as the 2050 goal of a 50 percent reduction 0 below 1990 levels. zW EN-18 Establish a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and measurement framework for use i. by all King County jurisdictions to efficiently and effectively measure progress toward countywide targets established pursuant to policy EN-17 U 4 DI.H Page 233 of 339 We King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 EN-19 Promote energy efficiency, conservation methods and sustainable energy sources to support climate change reduction goals. EN-20 Plan and implement land use,transportation, and building practices that will greatly reduce consumption of fossil fuels. EN-21 Formulate and implement climate change adaptation strategies that address the impacts of climate change to public health and safety,the economy, public and private infrastructure,water resources, and habitat. zW w a cU 1 5 DI.H Page 234 of 339 AWg King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2011 Amended December 3, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS The policies in this chapter address the location, types, design and intensity of land uses that are desired in King County and its cities. They guide Implementation of the vision for physical development within the county The policies also provide a framework for how to focus improvements to transportation, public services,the environment,and affordable housing, as well as how to incorporate concerns about climate change and public health into planning for new growth. Development patterns policies are at the core of growth management efforts in King County;they further the goals of VISION 2040, and recognize the variety of local communities that will be taking action to achieve those goals. Overarching Goal:Growth in King County occurs in a compact, centers focused pattern that uses land and infrastructure efficiently and that protects Rural and Resource Lands. The Countywide Planning Policies designate land as Urban, Rural, or Resource.The Land Use Map in Appendix 1 shows the Urban Growth Area boundary and Urban, Rural, and Resource Lands within King County Further sections of this chapter provide more detailed descriptions j and guidance for planning within each of the three designations. DP-1 All lands within King County are designated as: Urban land within the Urban Growth Area,where new growth is focused and accommodated; Rural land,where farming, forestry, and other resource uses are protected,and very low-density residential uses, and small-scale non-residential uses are allowed; or Resource land,where permanent regionally significant agricultural,forestry,and mining lands are preserved. zw Urban Growth Area The Urban Growth Area encompasses all of the urban designated lands within King County w These lands include all cities as well as a portion of unincorporated King County Consistent with the Growth Management Act and VISION 2040, urban lands are intended to be the focus of future growth that is compact, includes a mix of uses, and is well-served by public p infrastructure. Urban lands also include a network of open space where ongoing maintenance is W a local as well as a regional concern. Q The pattern of growth within the Urban Growth Area implements the Regional Growth Strategy a through allocation of targets to local jurisdictions.The targets create an obligation to plan and provide zoning for future potential growth, but do not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee that U a given number of housing units will be built or jobs added during the planning period. 1 6 DI.H Page 235 of 339 410 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Several additional elements in the Development Patterns chapter reinforce the vision and targeted growth pattern for the Urban Growth Area. Procedures and criteria for amending the Urban Growth Area boundary address a range of objectives and ensure that changes balance the needs for land to accommodate growth with the overarching goal of preventing sprawl within the county A review and evaluation program provides feedback for the county and cities on the effectiveness of their efforts to accommodate and achieve the desired land use pattern. Joint planning facilitates the transition of governance of the Urban Growth Area from the county to cities, consistent with the Growth Management Act. Urban form and development within the Urban Growth Area are important settings to provide people with choices to engage in more physical activity, eat healthy food, and minimize exposure to harmful environments and substances. In particular, the quality and safety of walking and biking routes children use to reach school is known to affect their health. Goal Statement:The Urban Growth Area accommodates growth consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy and growth targets through land use patterns and practices that create vibrant, healthy, and sustainable communities. i Urban Lands DP-2 Promote a pattern of compact development within the Urban Growth Area that includes housing at a range of urban densities,commercial and industrial development,and other urban facilities, including medical,governmental, institutional, and educational uses and parks and open space.The Urban Growth Area will include a mix of uses that are convenient to and support public transportation in order to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicle travel for most daily activities. DP-3 Efficiently develop and use residential, commercial,and manufacturing land in the Urban Growth Area to create healthy and vibrant urban communities with a full range of urban services, and to protect the long-term viability of the Rural Area and Resource Lands. Promote the efficient use of land within the Urban Growth Area by using methods such as: Directing concentrations of housing and employment growth to designated centers; a Encouraging compact development with a mix of compatible residential, commercial,and community activities; Maximizing the use of the existing capacity for housing and employment; and Coordinating plans for land use, transportation, capital facilities and services. W W DP-4 Concentrate housing and employment growth within the designated Urban Growth Area. Q Focus housing growth within countywide designated Urban Centers and locally designated local centers. Focus employment growth within countywide designated Urban and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers and within locally designated local centers.U 1 7 DI.H Page 236 of 339 g King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-5 Decrease greenhouse gas emissions through land use strategies that promote a mix of housing, employment, and services at densities sufficient to promote walking, bicycling, transit, and other alternatives to auto travel. DP-6 Plan for development patterns that promote public health by providing all residents with opportunities for safe and convenient daily physical activity, social connectivity,and protection from exposure to harmful substances and environments. DP-7 Plan for development patterns that promote safe and healthy routes to and from public schools. DP-8 Increase access to healthy food In communities throughout the Urban Growth Area by I encouraging the location of healthy food purveyors,such as grocery stores and farmers markets,and community food gardens in proximity to residential uses and transit facilities. DP-9 Designate Urban Separators as permanent low-density incorporated and unincorporated areas within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators are intended to protect Resource Lands, the Rural Area, and environmentally sensitive areas,and create open space and wildlife corridors within and between communities while also providing public health, environmental, visual, and recreational benefits. Changes to Urban Separators are made pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies amendment process described in policy G-1. Designated Urban Separators within cities and unincorporated areas are shown in the Urban Separators Map in Appendix 3. DP 10 Discourage incompatible land uses from locating adjacent to general aviation airports throughout the county Growth Targets DP-11 GMPC shall allocate residential and employment growth to each city and unincorporated urban area in the county This allocation is predicated on: Accommodating the most recent 20-year population projection from the state Office of Financial Management and the most recent 20-year regional employment ZforecastfromthePugetSoundRegionalCouncil; a Planning for a pattern of growth that is consistent with the Regional Growth Q Strategy including focused growth within cities with countywide designated centers a and within other larger cities, limited development in the Rural Area,and protection W of designated Resource Lands; A Efficiently using existing zoned and future planned development capacity as well as the capacity of existing and planned infrastructure, including sewer and water U systems; 1 8 DI.H Page 237 of 339 i z'AAd King County Countywide Planning Policies November2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Promoting a land use pattern that can be served by a connected network of public transportation services and facilities and pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and amenities; Improving the jobs/housing balance within the region and the county; Promoting sufficient opportunities for housing and employment development throughout the Urban Growth Area, Allocating growth to individual Potential Annexation Areas within the urban unincorporated area proportionate to its share of unincorporated capacity for housing and employment growth. DP-12 GMPCshall: Update housing and employment targets periodically to provide jurisdictions with up-to-date growth allocations to be incorporated In state-mandated comprehensive plan updates; Adopt housing and employment growth targets in the Countywide Planning Policies pursuant to the procedure described in policy G-1; and Adjust targets administratively upon annexation of unincorporated Potential Annexation Areas by cities. Growth targets for the 2006-2031 planning period are I shown in table DP-1. I DP-13 All jurisdictions shall plan to accommodate housing and employment targets. This includes: Adopting comprehensive plans and zoning regulations that provide capacity for residential, commercial,and industrial uses that is sufficient to meet 20-yeargrowth needs and is consistent with the desired growth pattern described in VISION 2040; Coordinating water, sewer,transportation and other infrastructure plans and investments among agencies, including special purpose districts;and z Transferring and accommodating unincorporated area housing and employment targets as annexations occur dw r-- i a.Oa wA L a M UU 1 9 DI.H Page 238 of 339 2,013 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Net New Units 2006-2031 Net N w lobs 2006-2031 SAanexationA LA.....UOn.A Metrol olLtan Citie Metrol 03,000- _. _ __ _- _ 1qq7110._._ XD( -810 - 800 200 Burien AAO--__.---__--. -___4.9 ederaUNa fl.300_-_2,390__--_-.___ 300_.-- .290._.. 13, 10_..- rkly 857 -_-- 0.050 mood 0,200-.- 640 - - -_ 0---_ ento A,83s- 3,895-.-.--. 9,OM 70----___--_- q 25 300 I Core 8,638-- ._. __ 168,340-- n 3,000--- 000 - 5,750-- 20,00n lssaqua 290.-______. --- -_ IAOO--- 1,060-_ -__-__ 4000 Q90-- 00n 350 800 nnn X2,800--- larger ItlesSuhtotal- 28,050------------- - - 330.-- _-.-_--- _ 7n 1,470-- 140-_ - ._ __ .__ ._. _ AO oval 425-- t Macfl 19_-- 90 n f]ltl 200.- 23 pw on stl North9end_ 665—._-.__.-. 1ASn 285 135 - - 37AD---- Loms Small itles.5ubtotal_..- 10,927 tenllaLAnnexation-Areas- ,090-- -- y o- 2,17,0- Noah.Hlghli 87n 3,580 o O < Bear Creek UPO 910 D Unclaimed Urban Uninc. 650 90 Urban Growth Area Total 233,077 428,068 O DI.H Page 239 of 339 fir?King County Countywide Planning Policies November2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Amendments to the Urban Growth Area The following policies guide the decision-making process by both the GMPC and King County regarding proposals to expand the Urban Growth Area. I DP-14 Review the Urban Growth Area at least every ten years. In this review consider monitoring reports and other available data.As a result of this review, and based on the criteria established in policies DP-15 and DP-16, King County may propose and then the Growth Management Planning Council may recommend amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies and King County Comprehensive Plan that make changes to the Urban Growth Area i boundary. DP-15 Allow amendment of the Urban Growth Area only when the following steps have been satisfied. a) The proposed expansion is under review by the County as part of an amendment process of the King County Comprehensive Plan; b) King County submits the proposal to the Growth Management Planning Council for the purposes of review and recommendation to the King County Council on the proposed amendment to the Urban Growth Area; j c) The King County Council approves or denies the proposed amendment;and d) If approved by the King County Council, the proposed amendment is ratified by the cities following the procedures set forth in policy G-1. DP-16 Allow expansion of the Urban Growth Area only if at least one of the following criteria is met: a) A countywide analysis determines that the current Urban Growth Area is insufficient in size and additional land is needed to accommodate the housing and employment growth targets, including institutional and other non-residential uses,and there are no other reasonable measures,such as increasing density or rezoning existing urban land,that would avoid the need to expand the Urban Growth Area; or b) A proposed expansion of the Urban Growth Area is accompanied by dedication of permanent open space to the King County Open Space System, where the acreage of w the proposed open space j 1) is at least four times the acreage of the land added to the Urban Growth Area; 2) is contiguous with the Urban Growth Area with at least a portion of the dedicated open space surrounding the proposed Urban Growth Area 4 expansion;and W 3) Preserves high quality habitat, critical areas, or unique features that q contribute to the band of permanent open space along the edge of the Urban Growth Area; or m c) The area is currently a King County park being transferred to a city to be maintained U as a park in perpetuity or is park land that has been owned by a city since 1994 and is less than thirty acres in size.2 1 DI.H Page 240 of 339 A13 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-17 If expansion of the Urban Growth Area is warranted based on the criteria in DP-16(a)or DP-16(b),add land to the Urban Growth Area only if it meets all of the following criteria: a) Is adjacent to the existing Urban Growth Area and is no larger than necessary to promote compact development that accommodates anticipated growth needs; b) Can be efficiently provided with urban services and does not require supportive facilities located in the Rural Area; c) Follows topographical features that form natural boundaries, such as rivers and ridge lines and does not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds,that impede the provision of urban services; d) Is not currently designated as Resource Land; e) Is sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban development without significant adverse environmental impacts,unless the area is designated as an Urban Separator by interlocal agreement between King County and the annexing city; and f) Is subject to an agreement between King County and the city or town adjacent to the area that the area will be added to the city's Potential Annexation Area. Upon ratification of the amendment,the Countywide Planning Policies will reflect both the Urban Growth Area change and Potential Annexation Area change. DP-18 Allow redesignation of Urban land currently within the Urban Growth Area to Rural land outside of the Urban Growth Area if the land is not needed to accommodate projected urban growth,is not served by public sewers,is contiguous with the Rural Area,and: a) Is not characterized by urban development; b) Is currently developed with a low density lot pattern that cannot be realistically redeveloped at an urban density;or c) Is characterized by environmentally sensitive areas making it inappropriate for higher density development. z c4 Review and Evaluation Program d The following policies guide the decision-buildable lands program conducted by the GMPC and King County pZj DP-19 Conduct a buildable lands program that meets or exceeds the review and evaluation 0 requirements of the Growth Management Act.The purposes of the buildable lands program W are: To collect and analyze data on development activity, land supply, and capacity for M residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; Y To evaluate the consistency of actual development densities with current comprehensive plans; and U To evaluate the sufficiency of land capacity to accommodate growth for the remainder of the planning period. 2 2 DI.H Page 241 of 339 We King County Counfywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-20 If necessary based on the findings of a periodic buildable lands evaluation report, adopt reasonable measures,other than expansion of the Urban Growth Area, to increase land capacity for housing and employment growth within the Urban Growth Area by making more efficient use of urban land consistent with current plans and targets. Joint Planning and Annexation DP-21 Coordinate the preparation of comprehensive plans among adjacent and other affected jurisdictions as a means to avoid or mitigate the potential cross-border impacts of urban I development. DP-22 Designate Potential Annexation Areas in city comprehensive plans and adopt them in the Countywide Planning Policies. Ensure that Potential Annexation Areas do not overlap or leave unincorporated urban islands between cities. DP-23 Facilitate the annexation of unincorporated areas within the Urban Growth Area that are already urbanized and are within a city's Potential Annexation Area in order to provide urban services to those areas.Annexation is preferred over incorporation. DP-24 Allow cities to annex territory only within their designated Potential Annexation Area as shown in the Potential Annexation Areas Map in Appendix 2. Phase annexations to coincide with the ability of cities to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed.I DP-25 Within the North Highline unincorporated area,where Potential Annexation Areas overlapped prior to January 1, 2009,strive to establish alternative non-overlapping Potential Annexation Area boundaries through a process of negotiation. Absent a negotiated resolution, Cn a city may file a Notice of Intent to Annex with the Boundary Review Board for King County for territory within its designated portion of a Potential Annexation Area overlap as shown in the Potential Annexation Areas Map in Appendix 2 and detailed in the city's comprehensive plan P after the following steps have been taken: a a) The city proposing annexation has, at least 30 days prior to filing a Notice of Intent 2 to annex with the Boundary Review Board, contacted in writing the cities with the p PAA overlap and the county to provide notification of the city's intent to annex and O to request a meeting or formal mediation to discuss boundary alternatives,and; W b) The cities with the Potential Annexation Area overlap and the county have either, i) Agreed to meet but failed to develop a negotiated settlement to the overlap q within 60 days of receipt of the notice, or ii) Declined to meet or failed to respond in writing within 30 days of receipt of the notice. U 2 3 DI.H Page 242 of 339 tea King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-26 Develop agreements between King County and cities with Potential Annexation Areas to apply city-compatible development standards that will guide land development prior to annexation. DP-27 Evaluate proposals to annex or incorporate unincorporated land based on the following criteria a) Conformance with Countywide Planning Policies including the Urban Growth Area boundary; b) The ability of the annexing or incorporating jurisdiction to provide urban services at standards equal to or better than the current service providers; and c) Annexation or incorporation in a manner that will avoid creating unincorporated islands of development. DP-28 Resolve the issue of unincorporated road Islands within or between cities. Roadways and shared streets within or between cities, but still under King County jurisdiction,should be annexed by adjacent cities. Centers A centers strategy is the linchpin for King County to achieve the Regional Growth Strategy as well as a range of other objectives, particularly providing a land use framework for an efficient and effective regional transit system. Countywide designation of Urban Centers and local designation of local centers provide for locations of mixed-use zoning, infrastructure, and concentrations of services and amenities to accommodate both housing and employment growth. Manufacturing/Industrial Centers preserve lands for family-wage jobs in basic Industries and trade and provide areas where that employment may grow in the future. Goal Statement:King County grows in a manner that reinforces and expands upon a system of CO existing and planned central places within which concentrated residential communities and economic activities can flourish. da F Urban Centers z a DP-29 Concentrate housing and employment growth within designated Urban Centers. U DP-30 Designate Urban Centers in the Countywide Planning Policies where city-nominated W locations meet the criteria in policies DP-31 and DP-32 and where the city's commitments will A help ensure the success of the center Urban Centers will be limited in number and located on existing or planned high capacity transit corridors to provide a framework for targeted privateandpublicinvestmentsthatsupportregionallanduseandtransportationgoals.The Land Use U Map in Appendix 1 shows the locations of the designated Urban Centers. 2 4 DI.H Page 243 of 339 4J6 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-31 Allow designation of new Urban Centers where the proposed Center, a) Encompasses an area up to one and a half square miles;and b) Has adopted zoning regulations and infrastructure plans that are adequate to accommodate: 1) A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of an existing or planned high-capacity transit station; ii) At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre within the Urban Center;and iii) At a minimum, an average of 15 housing units per gross acre within the Urban Center DP-32 Adopt a map and housing and employment growth targets In city comprehensive plans for each Urban Center, and adopt policies to promote and maintain quality of life in the Center through: A broad mix of land uses that foster both daytime and nighttime activities and opportunities for social interaction; A range of affordable and healthy housing choices; Historic preservation and adaptive reuse of historic places; Parks and public open spaces that are accessible and beneficial to all residents in the Urban Center; Strategies to increase tree canopy within the Urban Center and incorporate low- impact development measures to minimize stormwater runoff; Facilities to meet human service needs; Superior urban design which reflects the local community vision for compact urban development; Pedestrian and bicycle mobility, transit use,and linkages between these modes; Planning for complete streets to provide safe and inviting access to multiple travel modes, especially bicycle and pedestrian travel;and Parking management and other strategies that minimize trips made by single- z occupant vehicle, especially during peak commute periods. w DP-33 Form the land use foundation for a regional high-capacity transit system through the designation of a system of Urban Centers. Urban Centers should receive high priority for the Zlocationoftransitservice. aO Manufacturing/ILrdustrial Centers W DP-34 Concentrate manufacturing and industrial employment within countywide designated A Manufacturing/Industrial Centers.The Land Use Map in Appendix 1 shows the locations of the a designated Manufacturing/Industrial Centers. I U 2 5 DI.H Page 244 of 339 a King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-35 Adopt in city comprehensive plans a map and employment growth targets for each Manufacturing/ Industrial Center and adopt policies and regulations for the Center to: Provide zoning and infrastructure adequate to accommodate a minimum of 10,000 jobs; Preserve and enhance sites that are appropriate for manufacturing or other industrial uses; Strictly limit residential uses and discourage land uses that are not compatible with manufacturing and industrial uses,such as by imposing low maximum size limits on offices and retail uses that are not accessory to an industrial use; Facilitate the mobility of employees by transit and the movement of goods by truck, rail,air or waterway, as appropriate; Provide for capital facility improvement projects which support the movement of goods and manufacturing/industrial operations; Ensure that utilities are available to serve the center; Avoid conflicts with adjacent land uses to ensure the continued viability of the land in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center for manufacturing and industrial activities; and Attract and retain the types of businesses that will ensure economic growth and stability DP-36 Minimize or mitigate potential health impacts of the activities in Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers on residential communities, schools, open space, and other public facilities. DP-37 Designate additional Manufacturing/Industrial Centers in the Countywide Planning Policies pursuant to the procedures described in policy G-1 based on nominations from cities and after determining that: a) the nominated locations meet the criteria set forth in policy DP-35 and the criteria established by the Puget Sound Regional Council for Regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers; b) the proposed center's location will promote a countywide system of Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers with the total number of centers representing a realistic growth 6 strategy for the county;and a c) the city's commitments will help ensure the success of the center wO Local Centers w DP-38 Identify in comprehensive plans local centers, such as city or neighborhood centers, q transit station areas, or other activity nodes,where housing, employment,and services are accommodated in a compact form and at sufficient densities to support transit service and to make efficient use of urban land. O 2 6 DI.H Page 245 of 339 e King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Urban Design and Historic Preservation The countywide vision includes elements of urban design and form intended to integrate urban development into existing built and natural environments in ways that enhance both the urban and natural settings.These elements include high quality design,context sensitive infill and redevelopment,historic preservation,and the interdependence of urban and rural and agricultural lands and uses. Goal statement. The built environment in both urban and rural settings achieves a high degree of high quality design that recognizes and enhances, where appropriate, existing natural and urban settings. DP-39 Develop neighborhood planning and design processes that encourage infill development,redevelopment, and reuse of existing buildings and that,where appropriate j based on local plans, enhance the existing community character and mix of uses. i DP-40 Promote a high quality of design and site planning in publicly-funded and private development throughout the Urban Growth Area. DP-41 Preserve significant historic, archeological,cultural,architectural,artistic, and environmental features, especially where growth could place these resources at risk. Where appropriate,designate individual features or areas for protection or restoration. Encourage land use patterns and adopt regulations that protect historic resources and sustain historic community character DP-42 Design new development to create and protect systems of green infrastructure,such as urban forests,parks,green roofs, and natural drainage systems,in order to reduce climate- altering pollution and increase resilience of communities to climate change impacts. rn DP-43 Design communities, neighborhoods, and individual developments using techniques that reduce heat absorption, particularly in Urban Centers. Q DP-44 Adopt design standards or guidelines that foster infill development that is compatible with the existing or desired urban character a. O Rural Area and Resource Lands w The Rural Area and Resource Lands encompass all areas outside of the Urban Growth Area and A include Vashon Island in Puget Sound and the area just east of the Urban Growth Area all the way to the crest of the Cascade Mountains. The Rural Area is characterized by low density development with a focus on activities that are dependent on the land such as small scale V farming and forestry The Rural Area also provides important environmental and habitat 2 7 DI.H Page 246 of 339 Jgd King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 functions and is critical for salmon recovery The location of the Rural Area, between the Urban Growth Area and designated Resource Lands, helps to protect commercial agriculture and timber from incompatible uses. The Rural Area,outside of the Rural Cities, is to remain in unincorporated King County and is to be provided with a rural level of service. Rural Area Goal Statement., The Rural Area provides a variety of landscapes, maintains diverse low density communities, and supports rural economic activities based on sustainable stewardship of the land. DP-45 Limit growth in the Rural Area to prevent sprawl and the overburdening of rural services, reduce the need for new rural infrastructure, maintain rural character,and protect the natural environment. DP-46 Limit residential development in the Rural Area to housing at low densities that are compatible with rural character and comply with the following density guidelines: a) One home per 20 acres where a pattern of large lots exists and to buffer Forest Protection Districts and Agricultural Districts; b) One home per 10 acres where the predominant lot size is less than 20 acres;or c) One home per five acres where the predominant lot size is less than 10 acres. d) Allow limited clustering within development sites to avoid development on environmentally critical lands or on productive forest or agricultural lands, but not to exceed the density guidelines cited in (a)through (c). DP-47 Limit the extension of urban infrastructure improvements through the Rural Area to only cases where it is necessary to serve the Urban Growth Area and where there are no otherfeasiblealignments. Such limited extensions may be considered only if land use controls are in place to restrict uses appropriate for the Rural Area and only if access management controls are in place to prohibit tie-ins to the extended facilities. DP-48 Establish rural development standards to protect the natural environment by using F seasonal and maximum clearing limits for vegetation, limits on the amount of impervious Zsurface,surface water management standards that preserve natural drainage systems,water quality and groundwater recharge,and best management practices for resource-based activities. DP-49 Prevent or, if necessary, mitigate negative impacts of urban development to the q adjacent Rural Area. a DP-50 Except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report), limit U new nonresidential uses located in the Rural Area to those that are demonstrated to serve the 2 8 DI.H Page 247 of 339 4JO King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Rural Area, unless the use is dependent upon a rural location.Such uses shall be of a size,scale, and nature that is consistent with rural character DP-51 Allow cities that own property in the Rural Area to enter into interlocal agreements with King County to allow the cities to provide services to the properties they own as long as the cities agree to not annex the property or serve it with sewers or any infrastructure at an urban level of service.The use of the property must be consistent with the rural land use policies in the Countywide Planning Policies and the King County Comprehensive Plan. Resource Lands i The Resource Lands are designated areas with long term commercial significance for agriculture,forestry, and mining, and are depicted in the Land Use Map in Appendix 1 as Forest Product Districts,Agricultural Production Districts,and Mineral Resource Lands. The use and designation of these lands are to be permanent, in accordance with the Growth Management Act. King County has maintained this base of agriculture and forest lands despite the rapid growth of the previous decades. The Resource Lands are to remain in unincorporated King County but their benefit and significance is felt throughout the county into the cities. Within cities,farmers markets are becoming important and sought after neighborhood amenities. The forests of the Pacific Northwest are some of the most productive in the world and King County has retained two-thirds of the county in forest cover Large scale forestry is a traditional land use in the eastern half of King County and remains a significant contributor to the rural economy In addition, forests provide exceptional recreational opportunities, including downhill and cross-country skiing, mountain biking, hiking,and backpacking. Goal Statement., Resource Lands are valuable assets of King County and are renowned for their productivity and sustainable management. z DP-52 Promote and support forest g and other resource-based industries ccGG pp forestry, agriculture, mining outside of the Urban Growth Area as part of a diverse and sustainable regional economy Qa DP-53 Conserve commercial agricultural and forestry resource lands primarily for their long- z term productive resource value and for the open space, scenic views,wildlife habitat, and critical area protection they provide. Limit the subdivision of land so that parcels remain large enough for commercial resource production. DP-54 Encourage best practices in agriculture and forestry operations for long-term protection q of the natural resources. DP-55 Prohibit annexation of lands within designated Agricultural Production Districts or within U Forest Production Districts by cities. 2 9 DI.H Page 248 of 339 410 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 DP-56 Retain the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District as a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County DP-57 Discourage incompatible land uses adjacent to designated Resource Lands to prevent interference with their continued use for the production of agricultural, mining, or forest products. DP-58 Support local production and processing of food to reduce the need for long distance transport and to increase the reliability and security of local food. Promote activities and infrastructure,such as farmers markets,farm worker housing and agricultural processing facilities,that benefit both cities and farms by improving access to locally grown agricultural products. DP-59 Support institutional procurement policies that encourage purchases of locally grown food products. DP-60 Ensure that extractive industries maintain environmental quality and minimize negative impacts on adjacent lands. DP-61 Use a range of tools,including land use designations,development regulations, level-of- service standards, and transfer or purchase of development rights to preserve Rural and Resource Lands and focus urban development within the Urban Growth Area. DP-62 Use transfer of development rights to shift potential development from the Rural Area and Resource Lands into the Urban Growth Area,especially cities. Implement transfer of development rights within King County through a partnership between the county and cities that is designed to: Identify rural and resource sending sites that satisfy countywide conservation goals and are consistent with regionally coordinated transfer of development rights z efforts; Preserve rural and resource lands of compelling interest countywide and to participating cities; w Identify appropriate transfer of development rights receiving,areas within cities; F Identify incentives for city participation in regional transfer of development rights Zi.e. county-to-city transfer of development rights); a Develop interlocal agreements that allow rural and resource land development p rights to be used in city receiving areas; 7 Identify and secure opportunities to fund or finance infrastructure within city Fy transfer of development rights receiving areas; and. A Be compatible with existing within-city transfer of development rights programs. UU 3 0 DI.H Page 249 of 339 d King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 HOUSING The Countywide Planning Policies provide a framework for all jurisdictions to plan for and promote a range of affordable,accessible, and healthy housing choices for current and future residents. Within King County,there is an unmet need for housing that is affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of area median income (AMI). Households within this category include low-wage workers in services and other industries; persons on fixed incomes including many disabled and elderly residents;and homeless individuals and families. A high proportion of these households spend a greater percentage of their income on housing than is typically considered appropriate. This is especially true for low and very low income households earning 50 percent or less (low) and 30 percent or less(very-low)of area median income. The county and all cities share in the responsibility to increase the supply of housing that Is affordable to these households. j While neither the county nor the cities can guarantee that a given number of units at a given price level will exist, be preserved,or be produced during the planning period, establishing the countywide need clarifies the scope of the effort for each jurisdiction. The type of policies and strategies that are appropriate for a jurisdiction to consider will vary and will be based on its analysis of housing. Some jurisdictions where the overall supply of affordable housing is significantly less than their proportional share of the countywide need may need to undertake a range of strategies addressing needs at multiple income levels, including strategies to create j new affordable housing. Other jurisdictions that currently have housing stock that is already generally affordable may focus their efforts on preserving existing affordable housing through efforts such as maintenance and repair,and ensuring long-term affordability. It may also be appropriate to focus efforts on the needs of specific demographic segments of the population. The policies below recognize the significant countywide need for affordable housing to focus on the strategies that can be taken both individually and in collaboration to meet the countywide need. These policies envision cities and the county following a four step process 1. Conduct an inventory and analysis of housing needs and conditions; 2. Implement policies and strategies to address unmet needs; 3. Measure results;and 4. Respond to measurement with reassessment and adjustment of strategies. C7 The provision of housing affordable to very-low income households,those earning less than j 30%of AMI, is the most challenging problem and one faced by all communities in the county. p Housing for these very-low income households cannot be met solely through the private x market. Meeting this need will require interjurisdictional cooperation and support from public a agencies, including the cities and the county U I 1 DI.H Page 250 of 339 MO King.County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Overarching Goal: The housing needs of all economic and demographic groups are met within all jurisdictions. H-1 Address the countywide need for housing affordable to households with moderate, low and very-low incomes, including those with special needs. The countywide need for housing by percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) is: 50-80°%of AMI (moderate) 16%of total housing supply 30-50%of AMI (low) 12%of total housing supply 30%and below AMI (very-low) 12%of total housing supply H-2 Address the need for housing affordable to households at less than 30%AMI (very low income), recognizing that this is where the greatest need exists,and addressing this need will require funding, policies and collaborative actions by all jurisdictions working individually and collectively Housing Inventory and Needs Analysis The Growth Management Act requires an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs as part of each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan housing element. Assessing local housing needs provides jurisdictions with information about the local housing supply, the cost of housing, and the demographic and income levels of the community's households. This information on current and future housing conditions provides the basis for the development of effective housing policies and programs. While some cities may find that they meet the current need for housing for some populations groups,the inventory and needs analysis will help Identify those income levels and demographic segments of the population where there is the greatest need. Further guidance on conducting a housing inventory and analysis is provided in Appendix 4. H-3 Conduct an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs of all economic and demographic segments of the population in each jurisdiction. The analysis and Inventory shall include: a. Characteristics of the existing housing stock, including supply, affordability and diversity of housing types; b. Characteristics of populations,including projected growth and demographic change; c. The housing needs of very-low, low, and moderate-income households; and d. The housing needs of special needs populations. Cry Strategies to Meet Housing Needs VISION 2040 encourages local jurisdictions to adopt best housing practices and innovative O techniques to advance the provision of affordable, healthy, sustainable, and safe housing for all residents. Meeting the county's affordable housing needs will require actions by a wide range a of private for profit, non-profit and government entities, including substantial resources fromfederal,state,and local levels. No single tool will be sufficient to meet the full range of needs in V a given jurisdiction. The county and cities are encouraged to employ a range of housing tools to 3 2 DI.H Page 251 of 339 444 King County Countywide Planning Policies November2012 Amended December 3, 2012 ensure the countywide need is addressed and to respond to local conditions. Further detail on the range of strategies for promoting housing supply and affordability is contained in Appendix 4. Jobs-housing balance, addressed in H-9, is a concept that advocates an appropriate match between the number of existing jobs and available housing supply within a geographic area. Improving balance means adding more housing to job-rich areas and more jobs to housing-rich areas. H-4 Provide zoning capacity within each jurisdiction in the Urban Growth Area for a range of housing types and densities,sufficient to accommodate each jurisdiction's overall housing targets and, where applicable, housing growth targets in designated Urban Centers. H-5 Adopt policies, strategies,actions and regulations at the local and countywide levels that promote housing supply, affordability, and diversity, including those that address a significant share of the countywide need for housing affordable to very-low, low, and moderate income households.These strategies should address the following: a. Overall supply and diversity of housing, including both rental and ownership; b. Housing suitable for a range of household types and sizes; c. Affordability to very-low, low, and moderate income households; d. Housing suitable and affordable for households with special needs; e. Universal design and sustainable development of housing; and f Housing supply, including affordable housing and special needs housing,within Urban Centers and in other areas planned for concentrations of mixed land uses. H-6 Preserve existing affordable housing units, where appropriate, including acquisition and rehabilitation of housing for long-term affordability. i H-7 Identify barriers to housing affordability and implement strategies to overcome them. H-8 Tailor housing policies and strategies to local needs,conditions and opportunities, recognizing the unique strengths and challenges of different cities and sub-regions. H-9 Plan for housing that is accessible to major employment centers and affordable to the workforce in them so people of all incomes can live near or within reasonable commuting distance of their places of work. Encourage housing production at a level that improves the 0balanceofhousingtoemploymentthroughoutthecounty H-10 Promote housing affordability in coordination with transit, bicycle, and pedestrian plans x and investments and in proximity to transit hubs and corridors, such as through transit oriented development and planning for mixed uses in transit station areas. U H-11 Encourage the maintenance of existing housing stock in order to ensure that the condition and quality of the housing is safe and livable. 3 3 DI.H Page 252 of 339 q King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 H-12 Plan for residential neighborhoods that protect and promote the health and well-being of residents by supporting active living and healthy eating and by reducing exposure to harmful environments. H-13 Promote fair housing and plan for communities that include residents with a range of abilities, ages, races, incomes,and other diverse characteristics of the population of the county. Regional Cooperation Housing affordability is important to regional economic vitality and sustainability Housing markets do not respect jurisdictional boundaries. For these reasons,multijurisdictional efforts for planning and adopting strategies to meet regional housing needs are an additional tool for identifying and meeting the housing needs of households with moderate, low,and very-low incomes. Collaborative efforts,supported by the work of Puget Sound Regional Council and other agencies,contribute to producing and preserving affordable housing and coordinating equitable,sustainable development in the county and region. Where individual cities lack sufficient resources,collective efforts to fund or provide technical assistance for affordable housing development and preservation,and for the creation of strategies and programs,can help to meet the housing needs identified in comprehensive plans. Cities with similar housing characteristics tend to be clustered geographically Therefore,there are opportunities for efficiencies and greater impact through interjurisdictional cooperation. Such efforts are encouraged and can be a way to meet a jurisdiction's share of the countywide affordable housing need. H-14 Work cooperatively among jurisdictions to provide mutual support in meeting countywide housing growth targets and affordable housing needs. H-15 Collaborate in developing sub-regional and countywide housing resources and programs, including funding, to provide affordable housing for very-low, low-, and moderate-income households. H-16 Work cooperatively with the Puget Sound Regional Council and other agencies to identify ways to expand technical assistance to local jurisdictions in developing, implementing and monitoring the success of strategies that promote affordable housing that meets changing demographic needs. Collaborate in developing and implementing a housing strategy for the four-county central Puget Sound region. Measuring Results O Maintaining timely and relevant data on housing markets and residential development allows x the county and cities to evaluate the effectiveness of their housing strategies and to make appropriate changes to those strategies when and where needed. In assessing efforts to meet v their share of the countywide need for affordable housing,jurisdictions need to consider public U actions taken to encourage development and preservation of housing affordable to households with very low-, low- and moderate-incomes, such as local funding, development code changes, 3 4 DI.H Page 253 of 339 d King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 and creation of new programs, as well as market and other factors that are beyond local government control. Further detail on monitoring procedures is contained in Appendix 4 H-17 Monitor housing supply, affordability,and diversity, including progress toward meeting a significant share of the countywide need for affordable housing for very-low, low, and moderate income households. Monitoring should encompass: a. Number and type of new housing units; b. Number of units lost to demolition, redevelopment,or conversion to non-residential use, c. Number of new units that are affordable to very-low, low-, and moderate-income households; d. Number of affordable units newly preserved and units acquired and rehabilitated with a regulatory agreement for long-term affordability for very-low, low-, and moderate-income households; e. Housing market trends including affordability of overall housing stock; f. Changes in zoned capacity for housing, including housing densities and types; g. The number and nature of fair housing complaints and violations;and h. Housing development and market trends in Urban Centers. H-18 Review and amend,a minimum every five years,the countywide and local housing policies and strategies, especially where monitoring indicates that adopted strategies are not resulting in adequate affordable housing to meet the Jurisdiction's share of the countywide need. O x I a U I U 3 5 DI.H Page 254 of 339 i iWg King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 ECONOMY overarching Goal:People throughout King County have opportunities to prosper and enjoy a high quality of life through economic growth and job creation. The Countywide Planning Policies in the Economy Chapter support the economic growth and sustainability of King County's economy A strong and healthy economy results in business development,job creation,and investment in our communities.The Economy Chapter reflects and supports the Regional Economic Strategy and VISION 2040's economic policies,which emphasize the economic value of business,people,and place. The Regional Economic Strategy is the region's comprehensive economic development strategy and serves as the VISION 2040 economic functional plan. VISION 2040 integrates the Regional Economic Strategy with growth management, transportation, and environmental objectives to:I support critical economic foundations, such as education, infrastructure,technology, and quality of life; and promote the region's specific industry clusters:aerospace,clean technology, information technology, life sciences, logistics and international trade, military, and j tourism. Each local community will have an Individual focus on economic development,while the region's prosperity will benefit from coordination between local plans and the regional vision that take into account the county's and the region's overall plan for growth. EC-1 Coordinate local and countywide economic policies and strategies with VISION 2040 and the Regional Economic Strategy EC-2 Support economic growth that accommodates employment growth targets(see table DP- 1)through local land use plans, infrastructure development,and implementation of economic development strategies. EC-3 Identify and support industry clusters and subdusters within King County that are components of the Regional Economic Strategy or that may otherwise emerge as having r significance to King County's economy p Z EC-4 Evaluate the performance of economic development policies and strategies in business U development and job creation. Identify and track key economic metrics to help jurisdictions W and the county as a whole evaluate the effectiveness of local and regional economic strategies.P. U 3 6 DI.H Page 255 of 339 i RW King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Business Development Business creation, retention, expansion, and recruitment are the foundations of a strong economy The success of the economy in the county depends on opportunities for business growth. Our communities play a significant role through local government actions,such as by making regulations more predictable, by engaging in public-private partnerships, and by nurturing a business-supportive culture. These policies also seek to integrate the concept of health communities as art of the county'sMENY i economic objectives, by calling for support of the regional food economy, including production, j processing,wholesaling and distribution of the region's agricultural food and food products. EC-5 Help businesses thrive through: Transparency, efficiency, and predictability of local regulations and policies; Communication and partnerships between businesses,government,schools,and research institutions; and Government contracts with local businesses. EC-6 Foster the retention and development of those businesses and industries that export their goods and services outside the region. EC-7 Promote an economic climate that is supportive of business formation,expansion,and retention and emphasizes the importance of small businesses in creating jobs. EC-8 Foster a broad range of public-private partnerships to implement economic development policies, programs and projects. EC-9 Identify and support the retention of key regional and local assets to the economy, such as major educational facilities, research institutions, health care facilities, manufacturing facilities, and port facilities. EC-10 Support the regional food economy including the production, processing,wholesaling, and distribution of the region's agricultural food and food products to all King County communities. Emphasize increasing access to those communities with limited presence of healthy food options. ZO UW Ya V 3 7 DI.H Page 256 of 339 17486 People People,through their training, knowledge, skills, and cultural background,add value to the region's economy Additionally, creating an economy that provides opportunities for all helps alleviate problems of poverty and income disparity EC-11 Work with schools and other institutions to increase graduation rates and sustain a highly-educated and skilled local workforce. This includes aligning Job training and education offerings that are consistent with the skill needs of the region's industry clusters. Identify partnership and funding opportunities where appropriate. EC-12 Celebrate the cultural diversity of local communities as a means to enhance the count's global relationships. EC-13 Address the historic disparity in income and employment opportunities for economically i disadvantaged populations, including minorities and women, by committing resources to human services; community development; housing; economic development; and public infrastructure. it Places Economic activity in the county predominantly occurs within the Urban Growth Area,including i Urban Centers and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers.Continuing to guide local investments to these centers will help provide the support needed to sustain the economy and provide greater predictability to businesses about where capital improvements will be located. In addition to making productive use of urban land, economic activity adds to the culture and vitality of our local communities. Businesses create active,attractive places to live and visit,and make significant contributions to the arts.The Rural Area and Resource Lands are important for their contribution to the regional food network,mining,timber and craft industries,while Rural Cities are important for providing services to and being the economic centers for the surrounding Rural Area. EC-14 Foster economic and employment growth in designated Urban Centers and Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers through local investments, planning,and financial policies. EC-15 Make local investments to maintain and expand infrastructure and services that support local and regional economic development strategies. Focus investment where it encourages growth in designated centers and helps achieve employment targets. DI.H Page 257 of 339 s'QbZ King County Countywide Planning Policies November2012 Amended December 3, 2012 EC-16 Add to the vibrancy and sustainability of our communities and the health and well-being of all people through safe and convenient access to local services, neighborhood-oriented retail, purveyors of healthy food (e.g,grocery stores and farmers markets),and transportation choices. EC-17 Promote the natural environment as a key economic asset. Work cooperatively with local businesses to protect and restore the natural environment in a manner that is efficient and predictable and minimizes impacts on businesses. EC-18 Maintain an adequate supply of land within the Urban Growth Area to support economic development. Inventory, plan for,and monitor the land supply and development capacity for, manufacturing/industrial, commercial and other employment uses that can accommodate the amount and types of economic activity anticipated during the planning period. I EC-19 Support Manufacturing/Industrial Centers by adopting industrial siting policies that limit the loss of industrial lands, maintain the region's economic diversity, and support family-wage jobs. Prohibit or strictly limit non-supporting or incompatible activities that can interfere with the retention or operation of industrial businesses,especially in Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers. EC-20 Facilitate redevelopment of contaminated sites through local,county and state financing and other strategies that assist with funding environmental remediation. EC-21 Encourage economic activity within Rural Cities that does not create adverse impacts to the surrounding Rural Area and Resource Lands and will not create the need to provide urban services and facilities to those areas. i Z 0UW FC)a+a iiU 3 9 DI.H Page 258 of 339 9 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 TRANSPORTATION The Regional Growth Strategy identifies a network of walkable,compact, and transit-oriented communities that are the focus of urban development, as well as industrial areas with major employment concentrations. In the Countywide Planning Policies,these communities include countywide designated Urban Centers and Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers, and locally designated local centers. An essential component of the Regional Growth Strategy is an efficient transportation system that provides multiple options for moving people and goods Into and among the various centers. Transportation system,in the context of this chapter, is defined as a comprehensive, integrated network of travel modes(e.g. airplanes,automobiles, bicycles, buses,feet,ferries,freighters,trains,trucks)and infrastructure (e.g. sidewalks,trails, streets,'arterials, highways,waterways,railways,airports)for the movement of people and goods on a local, regional, national and global scale. Goals and policies in this chapter build on the 1992 King County Countywide Planning Policies and the Multicounty Planning Policies in VISION 2040. Policies are organized into three sections: Supporting Growth—focusing on serving the region with a transportation system that furthers the Regional Growth Strategy; Mobility—addressing the full range of travel modes necessary to move people and goods efficiently within the region and beyond; and System Operations—encompassing the design, maintenance and operation of the transportation system to provide for safety,efficiency, and sustalnability Overarching Goal. The region is well served by an integrated, multi-modal transportationsystemthatsupportstheregionalvisionforgrowth, efficiently moves people and goods, and is environmentally and functionally sustainable over the long term. z Supporting Growth o F An effective transportation system is critical to achieving the Regional Growth Strategy and I, ensuring that centers are functional and appealing to the residents and businesses they are adesignedtoattract. The policies in this section reinforce the critical relationship between development patterns and transportation and they are intended to guide transportation investments from all levels of government that effectively support local, county and regional plans to accommodate growth. policies in this section take a multi-modal approach to serving growth,with additional emphasis on transit and non-motorized modes to support planned A development in centers. U DI.H Page 259 of 339 Y46 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Goal Statement:Local and regional development of the transportation system is consistent with and furthers realization of the Regional Growth Strategy. T-1 Work cooperatively with the Puget Sound Regional Council, the state, and other relevant agencies to finance and develop a multi-modal transportation system that enhances regional mobility and reinforces the countywide vision for managing growth. Use VISION 2040 and Transportation 2040 as the policy and funding framework for creating a system of Urban Centers and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers linked by high-capacity transit, bus transit and an interconnected system of freeways and high-occupancy vehicle lanes. I T-2 Avoid construction of major roads and capacity expansion on existing roads in the Rural Area and Resource Lands. Where increased roadway capacity is warranted to support safe and efficient travel through the Rural Area,appropriate rural development regulations and effective access management should be in place prior to authorizing such capacity expansion in order to make more efficient use of existing roadway capacity and prevent unplanned growth in the Rural Area. T-3 Increase the share of trips made countywide by modes other than driving alone through coordinated land use planning, public and private Investment, and programs focused on centers and connecting corridors, consistent with locally adopted mode split goals.I i T-4 Develop station area plans for high capacity transit stations and transit hubs. Plans should reflect the unique characteristics and local vision for each station area including transit supportive land uses, transit rights-of-way,stations and related facilities, multi-modal linkages, and place-making elements. T-5 Support countywide growth management objectives by prioritizing transit service to areas where existing housing and employment densities support transit ridership and to Urban Centers and other areas planned for housing and employment densities that will support transit ridership. Address the mobility needs of transit-dependent populations in allocating transit service and provide at least a basic level of service throughout the Urban Growth Area. Z T-6 Foster transit ridership by designing transit facilities and services as well as non-motorized O infrastructure so that they are integrated with public spaces and private developments to create an inviting public realm. a T-7 Ensure state capital improvement policies and actions are consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy and support VISION 2040 and the Countywide Planning Policies. T-g Prioritize regional and local funding to transportation investments that support adopted growth targets. UU 4 1 DI.H Page 260 of 339 yoga King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3,2012 Mobility Mobility is necessary to sustain personal quality of life and the regional economy For individuals, mobility requires an effective transportation system that provides safe, reliable, and affordable travel options for people of all ages, incomes and abilities. While the majority of people continue to travel by personal automobile,there are growing segments of the population (e.g. urban, elderly, teens, low income, minorities, and persons with disabilities)that rely on other modes of travel such as walking, bicycling,and public transportation to access employment,education and training,goods and services. According to the 2009Americon Community Survey, about 8.7 percent of all households in King County had no vehicle available. For many minority populations, more than 20 percent had no vehicle available to them. The movement of goods is also of vital importance to the local and regional economy International trade Is a significant source of employment and economic activity in terms of transporting freight, local consumption, and exporting of goods. The policies in this section are intended to address use and integration of the multiple modes necessary to move people and goods within and beyond the region. The importance of the roadway network, Implicit in the policies of this section,is addressed more specifically in the System Operations section of this chapter Goal Statement.,A well-integrated, multi-modal transportation system transports people and goods effectively and efficiently to destinations within the region and beyond. T-9 Promote the mobility of people and goods through a multi-modal transportation system based on regional priorities consistent with VISION 2040 and local comprehensive plans. T-10 Support effective management of existing air, marine and rail transportation capacity and address future capacity needs in cooperation with responsible agencies, affected communities, and users. T-11 Develop and implement freight mobility strategies that strengthen King County's role as a o major regional freight distribution hub,an international trade gateway, and a manufacturing area. T-12 Address the needs of non-driving populations in the development and management of a local and regional transportation systems. T-13 Site and design transit stations and transit hubs to promote connectivity and access for pedestrian and bicycle patrons. U 4 2 DI.H Page 261 of 339 x'AAa'King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 System Operations The design, management and operation of the transportation system are major factors that influence the region's growth and mobility Policies in this section stress the need to make efficient use of the existing infrastructure,serve the broad needs of the users,address safety and public health issues,and design facilities that are a good fit for the surroundings. Implementation of the policies will require the use of a wide range of tools Including, but not limited to: technologies such as intelligent transportation systems and alternative fuels; i demand management programs for parking, commute trip reduction and congestion; and incentives, pricing systems and other strategies to encourage choices that increase mobility while improving public health and environmental sustainability Goal Statement: The regional transportation system is well-designed and managed to protect public investments, promote public health and safety, and achieve optimum efficiency. T-14 Prioritize essential maintenance, preservation,and safety improvements of the existing transportation system to protect mobility and avoid more costly replacement projects. T-15 Design and operate transportation facilities in a manner that is compatible with and integrated into the natural and built environments in which they are located. Incorporate features such as natural drainage, native plantings, and local design themes that facilitate integration and compatibility T-16 Protect the transportation system (e.g. roadway, rail,transit, air,and marine)against major disruptions by developing prevention and recovery strategies and by coordinating disaster response plans. T-17 Promote the use of tolling and other pricing strategies to effectively manage the transportation system, provide a stable and sustainable transportation funding source,and 0 improve mobility o; T-18 Develop a countywide monitoring system to determine how transportation investments P are performing over time consistent with Transportation 2040 recommendations.I I T-19 Design roads and streets, including retrofit projects, to accommodate a range of i; motorized and non-motorized travel modes in order to reduce injuries and fatalities and to a encourage non-motorized travel. The design should include well-defined, safe and appealing spaces for pedestrians and bicyclists. U 4 3 DI.H Page 262 of 339 4je King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 T-20 Develop a transportation system that minimizes negative impacts to human health, including exposure to environmental toxins generated by vehicle emissions. T-21 Provide opportunities for an active,healthy lifestyle by integrating the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists in the local and regional transportation plans and systems. T-22 Plan and develop a countywide transportation system that reduces greenhouse gas emissions by advancing strategies that shorten trip length or replace vehicle trips to decrease vehicle miles traveled. T-23 Apply technologies, programs and other strategies that optimize the use of existing infrastructure in order to improve mobility, reduce congestion,increase energy-efficiency,and reduce the need for new infrastructure. T-24 Promote the expanded use of alternative fuel vehicles by the general public with measures such as converting public and private fleets, applying incentive programs, and providing for electric vehicle charging stations throughout the Urban Growth Area. O F F 0OaEn Z L A UU 4 4 DI.H Page 263 of 339 YU9 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3,2012 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES Overarching Goal: County residents in both Urban and Rural Areas have access to the public services needed In order to advance public health and safety, protect the environment, and carry out the Regional Growth Strategy. Urban and Rural Levels of Service The Growth Management Act directs jurisdictions and special purpose districts to provide public facilities and services to support development. The Growth Management Act distinguishes between urban and rural services and states that land within the Urban Growth Area should be provided with a full range of services necessary to sustain urban communities while land within the Rural Area should receive services to support a rural lifestyle. Certain services, such as sanitary sewers, are allowed only in the Urban Growth Area,except as otherwise authorized. The Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictions to determine which facilities are necessary to serve the desired growth pattern and how they will be financed,in order to ensure timely provision of adequate services and facilities. PF-1 Provide a full range of urban services in the Urban Growth Area to support the Regional Growth Strategy and adopted growth targets and limit the availability of services in the Rural Area consistent with VISION 2040. Collaboration Among Jurisdictions 5 More than 100 special purpose districts, including water,sewer, flood control, stormwater, fire, W school and other districts, provide essential services to the residents of King County.While cities are the primary providers of services in the Urban Growth Area,in many parts of the county special purpose districts also provide essential services. Coordination and collaboration among all of these districts,the cities, King County, the tribes, and neighboring counties is key to providing efficient, high-quality and reliable services to support the Regional Growth i Strategy w PF-2 Coordinate among jurisdictions and service providers to provide reliable and cost- a effective services to the public. W a PF-3 Cities are the appropriate providers of services to the Urban Growth Area, either directly or by contract. Extend urban services through the use of special districts only where there are agreements with the city in whose Potential Annexation Area the extension is proposed.Within U the Urban Growth Area, as time and conditions warrant, cities will assume local urban services provided by special service districts. 4 5 DI.H Page 264 of 339 e King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 utilities Utilities include infrastructure and services that provide water supply,sewage treatment and disposal,solid waste disposal,energy,and telecommunications. Providing these utilities in a cost-effective way is essential to maintaining the health and safety of King County residents and to implementing the Regional Growth Strategy Water Supply Conservation and efficient use of water resources are vital to ensuring the reliability of the region's water supply,the availability of sufficient water supplies for future generations,and the environmental sustainability of the water supply system. PF-4 Develop plans for long-term water provision to support growth and to address the potential impacts of climate change on regional water resources. PF-5 Support efforts to ensure that all consumers have access to a safe, reliably maintained, and sustainable drinking water source that meets present and future needs. PF-6 Coordinate water supply among local jurisdictions,tribal governments, and water purveyors to provide reliable and cost-effective sources of water for all users, including residents, businesses,fire districts, and aquatic species. U3W PF-7 Plan and locate water systems in the Rural Area that are appropriate for rural uses and U densities and do not increase the development potential of the Rural Area. W m PF-8 Recognize and support agreements with water purveyors in adjacent cities and counties to promote effective conveyance of water supplies and to secure adequate supplies for N emergencies. PF-9 Implement water conservation and efficiency efforts to protect natural resources, reduce d environmental impacts, and support a sustainable long-term water supply to serve the growing w population. U PF-10 Encourage water reuse and reclamation, especially for high-volume non-potable water users such as parks,schools, and golf courses. c, cV 4 6 DI.H Page 265 of 339 i Q King County Countywide Planning Policies 1 November2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Sewage Treatment and Disposal Within the Urban Growth Area, connection to sanitary sewers is necessary to support the Regional Growth Strategy and to accommodate urban densities. Alternatives to the sanitary sewer system and the typical septic system are becoming more cost effective and therefore, more available. Alternative technology may be appropriate when it can perform as well or better than sewers in the Urban Growth Area. Septic systems are not considered to be alternative technology within the Urban Growth Area. In the Rural Area and Resource Lands,which are characterized by low-density development, sewer service is not typically provided. In cases where public health is threatened, sewers can be provided in the Rural Area but only if connections are strictly limited. Alternative technology may be necessary to substitute for septic systems in the Rural Area. PF-11 Require all development in the Urban Growth Area to be served by a public sewer system except: a) single-family residences on existing individual lots that have no feasible access to sewers may utilize individual septic systems on an interim basis; or b) development served by alternative technology other than septic systems that: provide equivalent performance to sewers; provide the capacity to achieve planned densities; and will not create a barrier to the extension of sewer service within the Urban Growth Area PF-12 Prohibit sewer service in the Rural Area and on Resource Lands except:r a) where needed to address specific health and safety problems threatening existing U structures;or b) as allowed by Countywide Planning Policy DP-47; or iX1 c) as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report). Sewer service authorized consistent with this policy shall be provided in a manner that does not increase development potential in the Rural Area. W P a U Solid Waste w U King County and the entire Puget Sound region are recognized for successful efforts to collect pi recyclable waste. Continuing to reduce and reuse waste will require concerted and coordinated a efforts well into the future. It is important to reduce the waste stream going into area landfills to extend the usable life of existing facilities and reduce the need for additional capacity Q j I PF-13 Reduce the solid waste stream and encourage reuse and recycling. U 4 7 DI.H Page 266 of 339 I d King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Energy While King County consumers have access to electrical energy derived from hydropower,there are challenges for securing long-term reliable energy and for becoming more energy efficient. PF-14 Reduce the rate of energy consumption through efficiency and conservation as a means to lower energy costs and mitigate environmental impacts associated with traditional energy supplies. PF-15 Promote the use of renewable and alternative energy resources to help meet the county's long-term energy needs, reduce environmental impacts associated with traditional energy supplies,and increase community sustainability Telecommunicatlons A telecommunications network throughout King County is essential to fostering broad economic vitality and equitable access to information,goods and services,and opportunities for social connection. i PF-16 Plan for the provision of telecommunication infrastructure to serve growth and development In a manner consistent with the regional and countywide vision. I Human and Community Services j U Public services beyond physical infrastructure are also necessary to sustain the health and quality of life of all King County residents. In addition, these services play a role in W distinguishing urban communities from rural communities and supporting the Regional Growth q Strategy Q PF-17 Provide human and community services to meet the needs of current and future residents in King County communities through coordinated planning, funding, and delivery of services by the county, titles, and other agencies. Q w U a Locating Facilities and Services a VISION 2040 calls for a full range of urban services in the Urban Growth Area to support the Regional Growth Strategy, and for limiting the availability of services in the rural area. In the ro long term, there is increased efficiency and cost effectiveness in siting and operating facilities U and services that serve a primarily urban population within the Urban Growth Area.At the 4 8 DI.H Page 267 of 339 II 4 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 same time, those facilities and services that primarily benefit rural populations provide a greater benefit when they are located within neighboring cities and rural towns. PF-18 Locate new schools, institutions,and other community facilities and services that primarily serve urban populations within the Urban Growth Area, where they are accessible to the communities they serve,except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task i Force Report). Locate these facilities in places that are well served by transit and pedestrian and bicycle networks. PF-19 Locate new schools and institutions primarily serving rural residents in neighboring cities and rural towns, except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report)and locate new community facilities and services that primarily serve rural residents In neighboring cities and rural towns,with the limited exceptions when their use is dependent upon rural location and their size and scale supports rural character I Siting Public Capital Facilities While essential to growth and development,regional capital facilities can disproportionately affect the communities in which they are located. It is important that all jurisdictions work collaboratively and consider environmental justice principles when siting these facilities to foster the development of healthy communities for all. PF-20 Site or expand public capital facilities of regional or statewide importance within the county in a way that equitably disperses impacts and benefits and supports the Countywide Planning Policies. WU W I I W i UQw U a i I a I UU 4 9 DI.H Page 268 of 339 n K C 5 K S 1t 4. n. SJip r CM- a. :_ :. w::»....,_ _ x.` 1 .. r:; fie DI.H Page 269 of 339 avw 3Sf1 QNV' I I XIQNHddV. laldpgD and Y t'' fife:+',• r. r f taEEc; Y i-' Yom. sP 1.. i: -'; cis;.<, yi" eLi rY. T y MW let Mama MV21 No SE CL c f 5- `•,. __ '_ _ 8 X351 Cl 1 y za ' i` j . ai 8• ^^-, ff?:; ii'+: 6'i' _ ._ ti i- _ D J'? -• "' g VONr Lis G 3T:; Ask i LY^ Z e i- +•..• 2-'. H`." nY CD Y Q _ C16 Q5 v 51 A rz 2 DI.H Page 270 of 339 Wq King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 APPENDIX 3. URBAN SEPARATORS MAPS Vifty DA.Hw C/) Mdh C. cf) f I kg King County Urban Separators: North Overview-June 2012 1,,q VI r!j FA DI.H Page 271 of 339 qu& aimq6: a, 31 l a u! G\ d|EVEN{ rG 4Dco f. , 6 DI.H Page 272 of 339 d King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Y u[AM>l MI>llll\t Ya,hM61 R of llflxll i J h k M Y to wm^ MwlxM JM5 MI Yx.f Af 1Yrx>, el MIYMfI n Y 1,\111 j 4• 1 o^" f I M„ " h'}'" 3 11 41n(I111VIlIe I Yu II.Ii IT r i p „Yxelq ul>.Mn ) 1 i i'`•1 iliY 4rxry x , a neR 6 K\nan F p Y' hMI VrHI„gKl(IfI3OCI MIM1M6 T ' ,r1. 1 If,' I ppn p i 1.:If Ywlf 4S\>f?nelnyc K. er I! I. '1 t.(1 S• u\vo>I F J' KIM>\K MYI>IN Kwrc>I nea b b y; I , ? • IS/t MY[IxM1 Mt1Mh K,hner At S ` ,.:1 :I i. 11j!'• y h ma i,. Redlnund j'I ' o u,t>xel Orr tf t<tngCourrty Urban Separators KirkfandlWlllows•June 2012 W f.> JnnM 1iU1ra 6cANe.BVdw> IM fsn[al OAp d(,T'yY W 9xY1.142'>+<Pnn+n,ICNb V+ r r MEGMV ft I 8 fv>\>I IM R JTw If„}.UtanRW etnl•.nd M>t lTi Mntral ez vm.Krrrn k'S9>wy S/ WA P'r W'i>xM,GN'r'i (Itxy[^,WlfNnxt+lf•W lNif rlrfd!/a1A IINfm(II Jr ' k]\F.rcopnJ b..YC*^%" OM V>x>yAh w\IMt+P1>N.Y'.Ie.+110.rY>) l Ml axr wY CYxxl CptxFWei,vm ed\Mx>vrN R+e>Tn f y c uvv e.A. w+we+(xslenA•I iWIT gp kel U 5 4 DI.H Page 273 of 339 4Ue King County Countywide Planning Policies November 1012 Amended December 3, 2012 APPENDIX 4 HOUSING TECHNICAL APPENDIX Affordable Housing Need Each jurisdiction, as part of its Comprehensive Plan housing analysis,will need to address affordability and condition of existing housing supply as well as its responsibility to accommodate a significant share of the countywide need for affordable housing. In order for each jurisdiction to address its share of the countywide housing need for very-low, low and moderate income housing,a four step approach has been identified: 1. Conduct an inventory and analysis of housing needs and conditions; 2. Implement policies and strategies to address unmet needs; 3. Measure results;and 4. Respond to measurement with reassessment and adjustment of strategies. The methodology for each jurisdiction to address countywide affordable housing need is summarized as follows: Countywide need for Housing by Percentage of Area Median Income(AMT) 1. Moderate Income Housing Need. Census Bureau estimates'indicate that approximately 16 percent of households in King County have incomes between 50 and 80 percent of area median income; establishing the need for housing units affordable to these moderate income households at 16 percent of each jurisdiction's total housing supply 2. Low Income Housing Need. Census Bureau estimates'indicate that approximately 12 w percent of households in King County have incomes between 30 and 50 percent of area °a median income; establishing the need for housing units affordable to these low income households at 12 percent of each jurisdiction's total housing supply U 3. Very-Low Income Housing Need. Census Bureau estimates'indicate that approximately 1 percent of households in King County have Incomes between 0 and 30 percent of area median income; establishing the need for housing units affordable to these very-low income households at 12 percent of each jurisdiction's total housing supply This is where] the greatest need exists, and should be a focus for all jurisdictions. px Housing Supply and Needs Analysis Context: As set forth in policy H-3,each jurisdiction must include in its comprehensive plan an inventory of the existing housing stock and an analysis of both existing housing needs and housing needed to accommodate projected population growth over the planning period. This',," policy reinforces requirements of the Growth Management Act for local Housing Elements. The h ousing supply and needs analysis is referred to in this appendix as the housing analysis. As is noted in policy H-1, H-2, and H-3,the housing analysis must consider local as well as countywide housing needs because each jurisdiction has a responsibility to address a U significant share of the countywide affordable housing need. 5 5 DI.H Page 274 of 339 tea' King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 The purpose of this section of Appendix 4 is to provide further guidance to local jurisdictions on the subjects to be addressed in their housing analysis. Additional guidance on carrying out the housing analysis is found in the Puget Sound Regional Council's report, "Puget Sound Regional Council Guide to Developing an Effective Housing Element," and the Washington Administrative Code, particularly 365-196-410(2)(b)and (c). The state Department of Commerce also provides useful information about housing requirements under the Growth Management-Act. Housing Supply Understanding the mix and affordability of existing housing is the first step toward identifying gaps in meeting future housing needs. Combined with the results of the needs analysis,these data can provide direction on appropriate goals and policies for both the housing and land use elements of a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. Ajurisdiction's housing supply inventory should address the following: Total housing stock in the community; Types of structures in which units are located (e.g., single-family detached, duplex or other small multiplex,townhome, condominium,apartment, mobile home,accessory dwelling unit,group home, assisted living facility); Unit types and sizes(i.e., numbers of bedrooms per unit); Housing tenure (rental vs. ownership housing); Amount of housing at different price and rent levels, including rent-restricted and subsidized housing; Housing condition (e.g. age,general condition of housing,areas of community with higher proportion of homes with deferred maintenance);a Vacancy rates; d Statistics on occupancy and overcrowding; U Neighborhoods with unique housing conditions or amenities; Location of affordable housing within the community, including proximity to transit; U Transportation costs as a component of overall cost burden for housing; Housing supply, including affordable housing,within designated Urban Centers and local 0 centers; Capacity for additional housing, by type, under current plans and zoning; and o Trends in redevelopment and reuse that have an impact on the supply of affordable x housing. Housing Needs The housing needs part of the housing analysis should Include demographic data related to w existing population and demographic trends that could impact future housing demand (e.g. p aging of population).The identified need for future housing should be consistent with the jurisdiction's population growth and housing targets. The information on housing need should a be evaluated in combination with the housing supply part of the housing analysis in order to U assess housing gaps, both current and future. This information can then inform goals, policies, and strategies in the comprehensive plan update. 5 6 DI.H Page 275 of 339 RMe King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 A comprehensive housing needs analysis should address the following population, household, and community characteristics: Household sizes and types; Age distribution of population, Ethnic and racial diversity; Household income, including the following income groupings: 30 percent of area median income or lower(very-low-income), Above 30 percent to 50 percent of area median income(low-income) Above 50 percent to 80 percent of area median income(moderate-income) Above 80 percent to 100 percent of area median income (middle-income) Above 100 percent to 120 percent of area median income (middle-income) Above 120 percent of median Income; Housinggrowth targets and countywide affordable housing need for very-low, low and moderate income households as stated in the Countywide Planning Policies; The number and proportion of households that are "cost-burdened." Such households pay more than thirty percent of household income toward housing costs. Severely-cost-burdened" households pay more than fifty percent of household income toward housing costs. Trends that may substantially impact housing need during the planning period. For example, the impact that a projected increase in senior population would have on q demand for specialized senior housing, including housing affordable to low-and a moderate-income seniors and retrofitted single family homes to enable seniors to age in t place. Housing demand related to job growth,with consideration of current and future jobs- U housing balance as well as the affordable housing needs of the local and subreglonal workforce.U Housing needs, including for low-and moderate-income households,within designated Urban Centers and local centers. i Note on Adjusting for Household Size 0 As currently calculated, the affordable housing targets do not incorporate differences in x household size. However, the reality is that differently-sized households have different housing needs(Le., unit size, number of bedrooms)with different cost levels. A more accurate approach to setting and monitoring housing objectives would make adjustments to reflect q current and projected household sizes and also unit sizes in new development. Accounting for zµi household size in providing affordable units could better inform local policies and programs as 4wellasfutureupdatesoftheCountywidePlanningPoliciesandaffordablehousingtargets. Ia Implementation Strategies n As stated in policy H-5, local jurisdictions need to employ a range of strategies for promoting U housing supply and housing affordability The Puget Sound Regional Council's Housing 5 7 DI.H Page 276 of 339 0 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Innovations Program Housing Toolkitr presents a range of strategies. The strategies are identified as being generally applicable to single family development, multifamily development, ownership housing, rental housing, market rate projects, and subsidized projects. Strategies marked as a "Featured Tool" are recommended as being highly effective tools for promoting affordable and diverse housing in the development markets for which they are identified. Measuring Results Success at meeting a community's need for housing can only be determined by measuring results and evaluating changes to housing supply and need. Cities are encouraged to monitor basic information annually, as they may already do for permits and development activity. Annual tracking of new units, demolitions, redevelopment, zoning changes, and population growth will make periodic assessments easier and more efficient. A limited amount of annual monitoring will also aid in providing timely information to decision makers. Policy H-18 requires jurisdictions to review their housing policies and strategies at least every five years to ensure periodic reviews that are more thorough and that provide an opportunity to adapt to changing conditions and new information. This five-year review could be aligned with a jurisdiction's five-year buildable lands reporting process. q W a U U WU F t7 0O Z S wa UU PSRC Housing Innovations Program Housing 7'oolkit littp:Hpsrc.org/growtivhip/ 5 8 DI.H Page 277 of 339 i 1410 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 APPENDIX 5 KING COUNTY SCHOOL SITING TASK FORCE REPORT On March 31, 2012 the School Siting Task Force issued the following report and recommendations related to 18 undeveloped school sites in King County,and future school siting. Countywide Planning Policies DP-50, PF-12, PF-18 and PF-19 contain references to this report, and in particular the Site Specific Solutions table found on pages 15-19. O W Ow F i U) 1OOx Uco U y I Qz QW Q i. I U i 5 J DI.H Page 278 of 339 0 0 lL 10( lH2i HDXOA) ISYI DNLLIS` IOOHOS AIMOO ONI} I : S XIQNHddV • lald2g0 CLNvV_OmCCCQ4vU ryN 3 M O L U c, ti N U vO o+ `, a c a v x av Z E DI.H Page 279 of 339 17486 March 31,2012 Dow Constantine,King County Executive King County Chinook Building 401 Fifth Avenue,Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Executive Constantine, With this letter we transmit to you the final report and recommendations of the School Siting Task Force. The critical issues of quality education,efficient use of taxpayer dollars,equitability,preservation of rural character, and sustainable growth made consideration of undeveloped rural school sites and all other future school siting a complex and important undertaking. Together, we have worked diligently since December to craft these recommendations. We represent diverse perspectives and through our discussions we have reached agreement on specific solutions and recommendations that we believe to be in the best interests of all King County residents, particularly our schoolchildren. We are pleased to present to you these recommendations informed by accepted data collected by our Technical Advisory Committee. We would be happy to serve as a resource in any way we can as you consider these recommendations.We look forward to your review,and we stand ready to assist in their implementation. Thank you for the opportunity to serve on the Task Force. We look forward to having these recommendations incorporated in future planning. Sincerely, King County School Siting Task Force members i i signatures on reverse) i DI.H Page 280 of 339 17486 Table of Contents SECTION 1.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 1 SECTION 2:GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS. 1 SECTION 3:OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION.4 OVERVIEW 4 GMPC GUIDANCE FOR THE TASK FORCE. 6 SECTION 4:THE TASK FORCE PROCESS 16 APPOINTING THE TASK FORCE. 6 HIRING A FACILITATOR 6 STRUCTURE AND ROLES OF THETASK FORCE.7 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 7 FRAMING WORK GROUP 7 MEETING STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 7 DECISION MAKING:A CONSENSUS APPROACH 8 PUBLIC PROCESS. 9 INFORMATION CONSIDERED BY THE TASK FORCE. 9 TASK FORCE REPORT 11 SECTION 5: RECOMMENDATIONS 11 INTRODUCTION. 11 RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS FOR UNDEVELOPED RURALSITES 11 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SCHOOL SITING 20 SECTION 6:IMPLEMENTING TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS. 22 NEXT STEPS. 22 APPENDICES(Attached) A. TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP ATTACHED D ATTACHED. FRAMING WORK GROUP MEMBERSHIP I C. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ATTACHED D. MAP OF 18 UNDEVELOPED SCHOOL SITES. ATTACHED E. GMPC MOTION 11-2. ATTACHED APPENDICES(ON CD) F MATRIXOF TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON UNDEVELOPED SITES ON ATTACHED CD G. MAPS OF UNDEVELOPED SITES ON ATTACHED CD H. DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION.ON ATTACHED CD I. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ONATTACHEDCD J. PUBLIC HEALTH ASPECTS OF SCHOOL SITING ON ATTACHED CD K. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORK(13 TASKS). ON ATTACHED CD L. STATESCHOOL SITING GUIDELINES ON ATTACHED CD M. EXISTING POLICYAND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ON ATTACHED CD N. EXCERPT FROM PSRC ISSUE PAPER ON RURAL AREAS, ON ATTACHED CD O. LAND USE PLANNING OVERVIEW. ON ATTACHED CD P MEETING SUMMARIES ONATTACHEDCD Q. OPERATING PROTOCOLS. ON ATTACHED CD R. PROCESS SCHEMATIC.ON ATTACHED CD DI.H Page 281 of 339 17486 S. TASK FORCE MEMBER INTERESTS ON ATTACHED CD T. INTERVIEW SUMMARY ON ATTACHED CD U. PUBLIC COMMENTS. ON ATTACHED CD l DI.H Page 282 of 339 17486 SECTION 1 Acknowledeements The School Siting Task Force thanks the King County Executive and the Growth Management Planning Council for the opportunity to provide input on an issue critical to supporting K-12 education and to preserving natural resources,public health,and quality of life in King County The Task Force would especially like to thank its members who agreed to serve on the Framing Work Group. This group met on multiple occasions throughout the process, generally twice between each Task Force meeting, to develop and frame issues and meeting approaches for the full Task Force. Without the considerable efforts of this group,the Task Force would not have been able to accomplish its work. The Task Force also thanks the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), whose members worked throughout January, February, and March of 2012 to gather data and information on the undeveloped rural school sites and to compile additional information relevant to future school siting. The Task Force also acknowledges the many members of the public who submitted comments and/or attended one or more Task Force or TAC meetings. Their contributions provided valuable insight for the Task Force's consideration. Finally,the Task Force thanks Triangle Associates for their exemplary support throughout the process. See Appendices A,E,and C for Task Force,Framing Work Group,and TAC membership. SECTION Z Glossary of Terms and Acronyms Comprehensive Plan A generalized coordinated land use policy statement of the governing body of a county or city that is adopted pursuant to 36.70A RCW (Washington State Growth Management Act) Countywide Planning Policies(CPPs) A written policy statement or statements used solely for establishing a countywide framework from which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted pursuant to the Growth Management Act. (Washington State Growth Management Act) Growth Management Act(GMA) The GMA was enacted in 1990 in response to rapid population growth and concerns with suburban sprawl, environmental protection, quality of life, and related issues. The GMA requires the fastest growing counties and the cities within them to plan for growth. The GMA provides a framework for regional coordination; counties plarming under the GMA are required to adopt county-wide planning policies to guide plan adoption within the county and to establish urban growth areas (UGAs). Local comprehensive plans must include the following elements: land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, DI.H Page 283 of 339 17486 transportation, and, for counties, a rural element. (Mimicipal Research and Services Center of Washington) Growth Management Planting Council(GMPC) The GMPC, which was established by an Interlocal agreement, is a 15-member council of elected officials from Seattle, Bellevue, suburban cities and King County The GMPC Itas been responsible for the preparation and recommendation of the Countywide Planning Policies to the Metropolitan King County Council,which then adopts the policies and sends them to the cities for ratification. (King County Comprehensive Plan) Identified Need Identified treed exists if a school district has determined the type of school needed and a timeframe for development on one of the 18 undeveloped school sites. (.Source:School Siting Task Force) Multi-County Planing Policies An official statement, adopted by two or more counties, used to provide guidance for regional decision- making, as well as a common framework for countywide planning policies and local comprehensive plans.(Puget Sound Regional Council) Nonconformance Any rise, improvement or structure established in conformance with King County rules and regulations in effect at the time of establishment that no longer conforms to the range of uses permitted in the site's current zone or to the current development standards of the code, due to changes in the code or its application to the subject property (King County Code) I Regional Growth Strategy An approach for distributing population and employment growth within the four-county central Puget Sound region(King,Kitsap,Pierce, Snohomish). (Puget Sound Regional Council) Rural Area Outside the urban growth area, rural lands contain a mix of low-density residential development, agriculture, forests, open space and natural areas, as well as recreation uses. Counties and adjacent small towns provide a limited number of public services to rural residents. (Puget Sound Regional Council) I Rural Character Rural Character refers to the patterns of land use and development established by a county in the rural element of its comprehensive plan: a. In which open space, the natural landscape, and vegetation predominate over the built environment; b. That foster traditional rural lifestyles, rural-based economies, and opportunities to both live and work in rural areas; DI.H Page 284 of 339 17486 c. That provide visual landscapes that are traditionally found in rural areas and conuimnities; d. That are compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and wildlife habitat; e. That reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development; f. That generally do not require the extension of urban governmental services;and g. That are consistent with the protection of natural surface water flows and groundwater and surface water recharge and discharge areas Washington State Growth Management Act) Rural Cities A free-standing municipality that is physically separated from other cities and towns by designated rural lands. Also referred to as "Cities in the Rural Area." The incorporated rural cities are Black Diamond, Carnation,Duvall,Enumclaw,North Bend,Skykomish and Snoqualmie. (Puget Sound Regional Council, King County Comprehensive Plan) Rural Towas Rural towns are unincorporated areas governed directly by King County They provide a focal point for comoumity groups such as chambers of commerce or community councils to participate in public affairs. The purposes of rural town designations within the County's Comprehensive Plan are to recognize existing concentrations of higher density and economic activity in rural areas and to allow modest growth of residential and economic uses to keep them economically viable into the future. Rural towns in King County include Alpental,Fall City and Vashon. (King County Comprehensive Plan) Rural Zoning The rural zone is meant to provide an area-wide, long-term, rural character and to minimize land use conflicts with nearby agricultural, forest or mineral extraction production districts. These purposes are accomplished by 1) limiting residential densities and permitted uses to those that are compatible with rural character and nearby resource production districts and are able to be adequately supported by rural service levels;2)allowing small scale fanning and forestry activities and tourism and recreation uses that can be supported by rural service levels and are compatible with rural character; and 3) increasing required setbacks to minimize conflicts with adjacent agriculture, forest or mineral zones. (King County Comprehensive Plan) Tightline Sewer A sewer trunk line designed and intended specifically to serve only a particular facility or place, and whose pipe diameter should be sized appropriately to ensure service only to that facility or place. It may occur outside the local service area for sewers, but does not amend the local service area. (King County Comprehensive Plan) Unincorporated Area Unincorporated areas are those areas outside any city and under King County's jurisdiction. (King County Comprehensive Plan) DI.H Page 285 of 339 174&6 Urban Growth Area (UGA) The area formally designated by a county, in consultation with its cities, to accommodate future development and growth. Given that cities are urban, each city is within a county-designated urban growth area. Cities may not annex lands outside an urban growth area, nor may they formally identify additions to the urban growth area independently of the county designation process. Development that is urban in character is to occur within the designated urban growth area, preferably in cities. Development outside the designated urban growth area is to be rural in character. (Puget Sound Regional Council) VISION 2040 VISION 2040 is the growth management, environmental, economic, and transportation vision for the central Puget Sound region. It consists of an environmental framework, a regional growth strategy, policies to guide growth and development, actions to implement, and measures to track progress. (Puget Sound Regional Council) SECTION 3: Overview and Background Information Overview I The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties and cities to work together to plan for growth. In King County,the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is the countywide planning body through which the County and cities collaborate. The GMPC is comprised of elected j officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities Association, and special purpose districts. The GMPC develops and recmmnends Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) to the King County Council where they are reviewed, adopted, and sent to the cities for final ratification. The CPPs were initially adopted in 1992;certain elements of the policies have been updated over the years. In 2010 and 2011, the GMPC undertook the first comprehensive evaluation of the CPPs since their initial adoption. A full set of updated policies is required to bring the CPPs into compliance with the multicounty planning policies (VISION 2040) adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council in 2008. VISION 2040 is the regional growth strategy for the four-county region including King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish Counties. On September 21,2011 the GMPC completed its review and voted to recommend an updated set of CPPs to the King County Council.However,they could not reach consensus on policies governing the siting of public facilities and services. At issue was whether public schools serving primarily urban populations should be sited in rural areas, and whether such facilities should be served by sewers. The recent update of VISION 2040 included policies stating that schools and other community facilities serving primarily urban populations should be sited in the urban growth area,and that urban services(sewers)should not be provided in anal areas. In the interest of consistency, the GMPC was considering adding similar policies to the CPPs. DI.H Page 286 of 339 17466 While the GMA is clear that sewers are not permitted in rural areas(except in limited circumstances), the CPPs have since 1992 contained a policy that allows public schools to be served by sewer when a finding is made that no alternative technologies are feasible.King County implements this policy by authorizing a tightline sewer connection after the finding is made. This potential change in policy was of concern to school districts, many of which owned or had an interest in undeveloped rural properties. While some had acquired their properties before the adoption of the GMA and CPPs, most had not. Those school districts purchasing land after 1992 did so under a regulatory framework that permitted schools in rural areas and that allowed a tightline sewer if needed.At the time, with rising land costs in urban areas and rapid growth, choosing less expensive rural sites seemed the most judicious use of limited taxpayer funds. Many school districts pointed out the difficulty of finding large parcels in urban areas, and the importance of siting schools so that they are convenient for all students, including those in rural areas. School districts leaders testified that they do not distinguish between the urban and rural portions of their service areas; their planning takes into account the needs of their districts as a whole. The policy debate generated testimony from rural residents, many of whom expressed concerns about the impacts of siting schools in rural areas, including traffic congestion, environmental degradation,and loss of rural character. They pointed out that while initial land costs might be lower in rural areas, the total costs to society of siting schools in non-urban areas might be greater. In addition to the impacts of transporting large numbers of urban students to schools in rural areas, the cost of transportation investments needed to support new schools are borne only by unincorporated area residents. These community impacts and financial burdens are not shared equally by residents in incorporated areas.Much of the testimony from rural residents questioned the fairness and sustainability of siting in rural areas infrastructure supporting primarily urban development. In order to address these concerns, to acknowledge the changing environment and to support school districts in their obligation to provide quality education for the children of King County, the GMPC agreed to set aside the policies related to siting public facilities and postpone their consideration until a task force made up of school districts, cities,King County, rural residents, and other experts could study the issue and report back to the King County Executive. GMPC Guidance for the Task Force The GMPC established guidance for formation of the School Siting Task Force in their Motion 11-2 Appendix E)on September 21,2011 The Task Force was given the Mission to: Develop recommendations to better align city, coanty, and school districts'planning for fi ture school facilities in order to provide quality education for all children and maximize health, environmental,programmatic,fiscal, and social objectives. GMPC Motion 11-2, School Siting Task Force Work Plan, Task Force Mission DI.H Page 287 of 339 17486 To fulfill this Mission,the GMPC recommended a specific scope of work.As described in GMPC Motion 11-2, the Task Force's primary task is "to evaluate the current inventory of rural properties owned by King County school districts"and to make recommendations as to their use or disposition. Collectively, the Task Force identified 18 undeveloped sites in rural areas. To further support the fulfillment of its Mission, it was anticipated that the Task Force might recommend legislative and other strategies. The GMPC established a set of eight principles to guide the Task Force in its work. All of the solutions recommended by the Task Force in this Report reflect the Guiding Principles established by GMPC: Academic Excellence: Educational facilities should promote and support the academic achievement of students. Equitable: All children should have access to quality educational facilities. Financially Sustainable:School siting should be financially sustainable for each impacted jurisdiction school districts, cities, county unincorporated areas, and sewer/water districts) and make the most efficient use of total tax dollars. Support Sustainable Growth: Planning for school facilities shall comply with state late and be integrated with other regional and local planning,including land use,transportation,environment,and public health. Community Assets: Schools should unite the communities in which they are located and be compatible with community character. Based on existing data and evidence: The Task Force process shall utilize recent demographic, buildable lands inventory,and other relevant data and information. Public Engagement: The Task Force process should include robust community engagement with impacted communities.Meetings will be transparent and open to the public for observation.The Task Force shall provide opportunities for public comment. Best Practice and Innovation: Lasting recommendations should serve the region well for years to come and support education,health,environmental,programmatic, fiscal,and social objectives. SECTION 4: The Task Force Process Appointing the Task Force The GMPC designated categories of membership in Motion 11-2, but did not specify individual members. Task Force members were appointed by the King County Executive(see Appendix A). Hiring a Facilitator Public Health - Seattle King Comity hired Triangle Associates as the independent facilitator to help coordinate the work of the Task Force, including conducting initial assessment interviews of all Task Force members, organizing Task Force meetings, facilitating development of recommendations by the Task Force and providing support through drafting and production of the Task Force's Final Report and Recommendations. DI.H Page 288 of 339 17486 Structure and Roles of the Task Force The Task Force established two workgroups to assist in the effort: the Technical Advisory Committee, also recommended by the GMPC)and the Framing Work Group.Both are described below Technical Advisory Committee The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was comprised of representatives from King County, the Puget Sound Regional Council, school districts, water and sewer districts, and the Suburban Cities Association. A membership list is included in Appendix C. The TAC met throughout the beginning and middle stages of the Task Force process; its role was to provide data and information to support Task Force decision making. TAC meetings were open to the public and included dialogue with those who attended.Meeting summaries(Appendix P)were developed to provide a record of their work. The primary work product of the TAC involved compiling a matrix containing information related to the 18 undeveloped school sites (Appendix F). In addition to populating the matrix with site-specific information,the TAC was asked to collect data and information in several other areas of inquiry, which collectively were referred to as the "13 Tasks" This included subject areas such as demographic trends and school enrollment projections.A complete list of the 13 tasks is included as Appendix F The TAC work and products enabled swift evaluation of, and development of solutions for, specific sites by the Task Force.The breadth and detail of the data compiled by the TAC,and that Committee's timely response to Task Force requests,played a critical role in the accomplishments of the Task Force. Framing Work Group Due to the short timeline for the Task Force to complete its work,the Task Force created a Framing Work Group(Appendix B)to frame issues for its consideration.Prior to each meeting of the full Task Force,the Framing Work Group met to review information gathered by the TAC and to discuss how best to organize information and issues for discussion. Doing so helped the Task Force have focused and substantive discussions and stay on task to meet their deadlines. The Framing Work Group made recommendations on process to the Task Force; however, all decision- making power remained with the full Task Force. Framing Work Group members were appointed by the Task Force Chair from the general Task Force roster.The group met on average twice between each Task Force meeting, and meeting summaries (Appendix P)were included in the materials that the Task Force received. Meeting Structure and Process The Task Force met six times from December 2011 through March 2012, using the process schematic Appendix R)as a visual guide for navigating its work effort: DI.H Page 289 of 339 17486 I 1 The first meeting, December 14, 2011, focused on introducing Task Force members,establishing a process for the work effort, and hearing Task Force member perspectives on hopes and desired outcomes from the process. 2. The second meeting, January 25, 2012, focused on learning infatuation from the TAC and creating a set of interests (Appendix S) based on the Task Force's Guiding Principles as established in the GMPC Motion 11-2. The Task Force also agreed upon a set of Operating Protocols(Appendix Q). 3. On February 16, 2012, the Task Force held a 4-hour workshop to begin developing solutions for the 18 undeveloped rural school sites and for future school siting. The Technical Advisory Committee presented data on each of the 18 sites, and each school district was given the opportunity to present additional information on their sites.The Task Force reached consensus on an approach for evaluating sites that was developed by the Framing Work Group. This approach involved identifying the critical or "threshold" factors that would allow Task Force members to create four categories into which the 18 sites would eventually be sorted. The first step was to brainstorm potential solutions for each category 4. On March 1,2012,the Task Force met for the fourth time,also in a 4-hour workshop.Working in small groups, Task Force members accepted possible solutions for the four categories of sites. They then sorted the 18 sites into the four categories and also considered future school siting.The Task Force reached consensus agreement on several items, including: The "Solutions Set and Criteria" document (Document 1 in the Recommendations section), with agreement that a few items needed additional definition, clarification, and confirmation at its next meeting The placement of all school sites in appropriate quadrants of the solutions table 5 On March 15,2012,the Task Force accepted by 100%consensus: A final version of the"Solutions Set and Criteria"document Recommended and prioritized solutions for 12 specific sites The following technical documents: Matrix of school sites, list of 13 tasks, population and demographic information, enrollment trends by school district, public health aspects of school siting. Recommendations to the Growth Management Planning Council and Washington State legislature related to school siting 6. On March 29,2012,the Task Force accepted the Recommendations Report to be submitted to the King Comity Executive. Decision Making, A Consensus Approach At the second Task Force meeting, the Task Force members accepted the Operating Protocols (Appendix Q). This document established roles for all non-Task Force members involved in the process, clarified communications protocols and workgroup composition,and defined a specific decision-making approach. DI.H Page 290 of 339 17486 The Task Force defined consensus as obtaining the full acceptance of all members;short of that,decisions and recommendations would move forward with the approval of at least 70%of the Task Force members present, with at least one member from each primary interest group (county, cities, school districts, and residents)voting in favor to accept a document or decision. Public Process The GMPC Motion stated that the Task Force process should include robust public engagement. All Task Force meetings and TAC meetings were open to the public. All written materials (agendas, meeting summaries, and other information)were made available on the Task Force website, and public comments were accepted throughout the process at Task Force meetings, through the Task Force website and via email. Comments from the public were summarized by the facilitator at the beginning of every Task Force meeting,and the compiled comments were emailed to Task Force members after each meeting(see Appendix U). Information Considered by the Task Force As Task Force members studied the issues associated with siting schools in rural areas,they considered a range of data and information.The majority of this information was provided by the TAC.It included the following documents, reports and policy frameworks, many of which are included in the appendices to this Report. 18 undeveloped rural school sites. The TAC prepared a matrix containing factual information related to each of the 18 sites including: general site information(e.g., zoning, acreage, assessed value), land use and transportation considerations (e.g., landscape position, distance to UGA, distance to sewer/water connection, environmental features), and the school districts' plans (e.g., intended use,development timeline).School districts were given the opportunity to correct and/or augment the information about their school sites. Planning context.King County staff provided the Task Force with a brief history of the land use planning in two areas where many of the undeveloped sites are located: the Bear-Evans Corridor and the Soros Creek Basin. The county's land use strategy in both areas employed zoning and development regulations on an area-wide basis so the cumulative impact of development would not cause environmental degradation. A summary of this history is included as Appendix O. GMA policy frameworlt. There is a strong policy basis in Washington State for focusing growth in urban areas, protecting rural areas and the environment, and the efficient provision of government services and facilities. The growth management framework considered by the Task Force included GMA, VISION 2040, the Countywide Planning Policies, King County Comprehensive Plan and King County Code. Relevant potions of these documents can be found in Appendix M. Demographic information. The Task Force was presented with information from the 2010 census that identified population trends in the urban and rural portions of each school district,and DI.H Page 291 of 339 i 17486 also dishict-wide. Significant demographic shifts have occurred in the past decade: from 2000 to 2010,the overall rural population in King County declined by 1%, and the rural population under the age of 18 declined by 18.4%. During the same time, the urban population saw an overall increase of 12.1%and under-18 increase of 8.3%.This information can be found in Appendix H. School district enrollment projections. The Task Force was presented with information related to current and projected school enrollment,which illustrates that district populations will continue to grow to varying degrees and that urban students will continue to comprise the majority of those populations. The anticipated enrollment for students from rural areas generally failed to materialize in the vicinities of the sites owned by school districts. The enrollment projections can be found in Appendix 1. Funding for school construction. Although there was no formal presentation on this topic, it came up on several occasions and was an important consideration for the Task Force.The Slate j of Washington does not provide funding to school districts for acquisition of properties; school districts must rely on their own finding sources (through bonds, levies, grants, and donations). Once properties are acquired, school districts can apply for state assistance for school construction as part of a state match program. Current criteria and process for school siting. Using both state regulations and locally adopted standards, school districts consider many factors when locating a site to develop a public school facility Following guidance set forth by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Washington Administrative Code(392-342-020 WAC), districts look at site quality,cost, projected enrollment, distance to students/transportation, and timing of school construction. The WAC guidelines can be found in Appendix L. Funding for county road maintenance. The TAC determined that the cost for upgrading, operating and maintaining county roads to serve future schools on the 18 undeveloped sites could range from$30-35 million over 20 years. This is important to consider because the County road fund has become severely strained, and because that cost would be home solely by j unincorporated area residents through the county road levy In addition to cost of road infrastructure and tax equity issue, there are climate impacts associated with transporting large numbers of students to schools in rural areas, in the form of increased greenhouse gas emissions. Public health aspects of school siting. One member of the TAC and one member of the Task Force presented information on the public health aspects of school siting. In recent years, best practices in school siting have evolved to reflect a more community-centered approach, placing schools in urban areas where children can walk to school and where school facilities can serve as community assets.The major themes identified in this research(included in Appendix I)include: a. School siting determines the proximity of schools to a student's home and larger community and can affect whether children achieve and maintain good health, b. Physical activity is key to children's health, c. School travel impacts children's health in multiple ways,and DI.H Page 292 of 339 17466 d. Education policy is also health policy Task Force Report This Report was drafted by the independent facilitation team.The Framing Work Group refined the initial draft document, which the Task Force considered at the March 15"meeting. Between the March 15"and March 29" meetings, the Framing Work Group, project team, and facilitation team refined iterations of the Report,with a final draft presented to the Task Force at its last meeting on March 29,2012,The Task Force.accepted the document, with revisions, at that meeting. The facilitation team made final revisions based on Task Force input before submitting this Report to the King County Executive. SECTION 5• Recommendations Introduction The GMPC and King County Executive requested that the Task Force recommend solutions for the 18 undeveloped rural sites and guidelines for fixture school siting. The Task Force analyzed data and information to create and prioritize specific solutions for each of the sites and to develop recommendations for future sites. These are encapsulated below in Recommended Solutions for Undeveloped Sites and Recommendations for Future School Siting, respectively Throughout the process, Task Force members identified other recommendations in support of its Mission; the other recommendations are listed under Recommendations for Future School Siting. Recommended Solutions for Undeveloped Rural Sites The Task Force focused the major part of its effort on the 18 undeveloped sites, seeking logical and sustainable solutions. Once the Task Force process was underway, the Task Force surveyed all the school districts to ensure the Task Force's scope included the universe of undeveloped tvral property with a school district interest.No other undeveloped rural sites were identified by the school districts. i The Task Force,with guidance from the Framing Work Group,decided to use a"threshold"approach for j determining solutions for each of the 18 undeveloped sites. This threshold approach identified two specific criteria; a site must possess one or the other in order to be considered for development. After some refinement,the Task Force accepted the following criteria for decision making: 1) Does the school district have an identified need for a school site? (Identified need exists if I a district has identified a type ofschool and a time fi-anre in which the school is needed.) I 2) Does the site border the Urban Growth Area (UGA) or have an existing sewer connection? (Bordering the UGA means the site is directly contiguous to the UGA. An existing sewer connection ureans server line is on site. This does not include sites with sewer on an adjacent parcel a-across fire sheet.) DI.H Page 293 of 339 17488 Based on these criteria, the Task Force accepted the threshold approach for sorting tite 18 sites and created the Solutions Table,which separated the school sites into four quadrants: Box A, in the upper left comer, includes sites that border the UGA and/or have an existing sewer connection and for which school districts have an identified need. Box B, in the upper right corner, includes sites that do not border the UGA and have no sewer connection and for which school districts have an identified need. Box C, in the lower left corner, includes sites for which school districts do not have an identified need and that border the UGA and/or have an existing sewer connection on site. Box D, in the lower right comer, includes sites for which school districts do not have an identified need and that do not border the UGA and have no existing sewer connection on site. Any and all other undeveloped rural school sites (those not among the 18 recognized sites) fall into future school siting"in Box E of the Solutions Table.Future school siting issues are addressed in greater detail in the section entitled Recommendations for Future School Siting. The Task Force then developed possible solutions for each box and ranked these possible solutions in order of preference, recognizing that circumstances for specific sites within each category might merit a different order. I The recommended Solutions Set and Criteria are shown here as Document 1. I I i DI.H Page 294 of 339 i 17486 Document I—Solutions Set and Criteria Existing Undeveloped School Sites in the Rural Area A.ssumplions for S0111ti01t Set.For any solution that would result in a school district not being permitted to use a site fora school,the Task Forcerecommendsoptionsthroughwhichtheschooldistrictcouldreceivefairandappiopiiatevalue. All solutions resulting in site development should mitigate impacts and provide community benefits. Any solutions that involve a change in the UGA or allow/prohibit sewer service shall be govened by the laws, policies,and/or administrative procedure(s)in place at the time. Additional solutions may apply;detailed analysis may be required to determine optimal solution for any site. All sites,site conditions,and identified needs are included in the Matrix.School districts were asked to bring forward any additional sites and no other sites emerged so the full and final list of specific sites is shown in Documents 2-3. NOTE. Solution Sets do each box is listed in priority order Site borders UGA or has sewer Find not border UGA and has no sewn• connection. 'Seivercamecoon deftnedashavmg n. sneer on sire aiready plot adjaceno. A B School district has in 1 Find an alternative site in the UGA n alternative site in the UGA identified need 2. Allow school district to connect to 2. tit Find an alternativeve it fbordering if e G ( for a school existing sever site. 3. Incorporate site into adjacent UGA 3 sol Itlt nrstanding thatorholdwiththeunde de nfedneed, any future development nest be exists if district has consistent with Vision 2040 as identified ppe of implemented by King County Code school mid a time frame in ivillch they need the school Prohibit:ratending additional server outside Prohibit: Moving UGA, tight-line server UGA p School district 1. Find an alternative site in the UGA I If the site is of value to the county, cities does not have 2. If the site is of value to the county,cities or community,facilitate the purchase, all identified or community, facilitate the purchase, sale,or land swap of property ueed for a sale,or land swap of property 2. Find an alternative site in the UGA school site.3. Sell,or hold with the understanding that 3. Sell,or hold with the understanding that any future development must be any future development must be consistent with Vision 2040 as consistent with Vision 2040 as implemented by King County Code implemented by King County Code Prohibit:Moving UGA, neiv sever Prohibit:Moving UGA, light-litre server connections All Other Undeveloped School Sites (Future) r Future School All future school siting should be consistent with Vision 2040. Siting DI.H Page 295 of 339 17486 Once the Task Force accepted these criteria and categories plus the prioritized solution sets for each quadrant,members considered each undeveloped school site.At the March I"meeting,the Task Force reached consensus agreement for the placement of each site in accordance with the accepted criteria. The accepted placement of each rural school site is shown below as Document 2. Document 2—Site Categorization Task Force breakout groups identified the sites in each category The full Task Force leached 100%Consensus on March 1,2012 on the following site categorization: Existing Undeveloped Sites in the Rural Area (18 sites) Site borders UGA or has sewer Site does not border UGA and has no sewer connection.Connection. A B School district Sites:Sites: has an Enumclaw A,D Enumclaw B identified need Lake Washington 2,4 Issaquah I for a school site Snoqualmie Valley I Tahoma I C D School district Sites:Sites: does not have Kent 4 Auburn 1,2,3 all identified Kent 1,2, 3 need for a Lake Washington 1, 3 school site Nmthshore I i All Other Undeveloped School Sites (Future) Future School E j Siting All future school siting should be consistent with Vision 2040. Once the Task Force accepted the threshold criteria and site categories,developed the basic solution sets for each quadrant,and placed the school sites in categories based on the threshold criteria,members brainstormed possible solutions for each site.Task Force members developed a preferred solution for each site,with a prioritized list of additional solutions.Where appropriate,they included notes, considerations,and rationale to support each site's recommended solution(s). The Task Force recognized that VISION 2040,the CPPs,the King County Comprehensive Plan,and the King County Code will ultimately govern what happens on both current undeveloped school sites and on any other future school sites in rural areas. In addition,school districts will control the timing and specific actions within that framework.The involvement of cities is needed to facilitate siting within urban areas. Document 3 below shows the recommended solution(s)for each school site,along with site-specific considerations. DI.H Page 296 of 339 17486 Document 3—Site-Specific Solutions Box A SITE BORDERS UGA or HAS SEWER CONNECTION School district has Overview. all In general, while the Task Force's preference is to find alternative sites in the UGA,the Task Force finds identified that for the sites in Box A the particular site conditions and circumstances facing the impacted school need fora districts may warrant other solutions. Thus the recommended solutions vary by site. For any school site, recommendations that allow for development on a site,the Task Force recommends that the district work with the county and community to minimize impacts on the nnal surroundings and twat residents. Because of the identified need by the school districts,the Task Force recommends that these sites receive prioritized attention from city,county and school district decision makers. Sites and their Solutions: Snoquahnie Valley 1 1. Allow school district to connect to existing sewer Site specfc: The high percentage off oodplain laud in this school district makes finding an alternate site very challenging. The site does not have significant conservation vahte. The site has an existing school,which was developed with the intent that another school would be built on the site. The district has mrdertaken site preparation for the addition of an elementary school on the site. The school district invested in the Local Improvement District that enabled the sewer to reach the site. Tahoma I 1. Find alternative site in the UGA 2. Allow school district to connect to existing sewer Site specific: The Task Farce encourages the district to work with the county and cities in the district toexploreopportunitiesforfindinganalternativesiteintheUGAthatwouldnheerthepressingneedfor additional capacity that development ofanother school would provide.Ifno viable alternative site that fits within the district's financial plans can be expeditiously found, the availability of server and an existing school on the site present compelling reasons for development of the site to meet lite district's needs. Tine site does have conservation value and tine Task Force recommhends that any new development on the site occur adjacent to the existing school so that impacts to the site's forest cover are minimized. Lake Washington 2 1 Find alternative site in the UGA 2. incorporate site into adjacent UGASitespecific: The site borders the Redmond watershed and has conservation value. The Task Force therefore encourages the school district, the county and the City of Redmond to fend an alternative site within the UGA that would meet the district's need for additional capacity that development of another school would provide. Tine parties should identify other partners and fuauding mechanisms that would allow for purchase of the property (perhaps in cotgunction with the Lake Washington I site) forpermanentconsevaliarhaswellasprovideresourcestothedistrictforpurchaseofanalternativesite. If no viable alternative site can be expeditiously identified, the Task Force recommends that the school district develop the site in a manner that preserves as much of the conservation value of the site as DI.H Page 297 of 339 17486 possible. This may be accomplished through,for example, incorporation of a small developable portion of the site (about five acres) into the UGA for a small environmental school*while placing the remainder of tine site into permanent conservation. The district should also work closely with the county and community to minimize other impacts, such as transportation. The Task Face does not recommend extension of sewer to any po lion ofthat site that remains onside of the UGA. If the site is proposed for incorporation into the UGA, it shall go through the King County docket process. Environmental School will have sustainable or "green" buildings and grounds (refer to State RCW 39.35D, "High Performance Public Buildings—Guidelines for School Districts'). Lake Washington 4 I Allow school district to connect to existing sewer Site specific: The Task Force recognizes fine school district's need for additional capacity in file eastern Portion of the district, which straddles the City ofRedmohd, the rural area, and an unincorporated urban island" surrounded by rural area. Tine site is part of a large parcel on which there is an existing elementary and middle school, both already connected to sewer The undeveloped portion of the site was previously used as a mink farm and portions of the site are cleared. The Task Face recommends that the district work closely with King County and the coninuhity to minimize both existing.and additional impacts on the area surrounding tile parcel, particularly the transportation impacts related to several facilities being located or developed on lire site. Enumclaw A&D: la.Find alternative site/s in the UGA lb. Place all school buildings and impervious surfaces on the urban side of the UGB and place ballfieldstplayfields on the rural side of the UGB. Site specific (]q). This joint site lies on the south-eastern boundary of the Black Diamond UGA and a master planned development (MPD) that has yet to be constructed. The identified need of the school district is associated primarily with the population projections of time MPD and with students residing j onside of the MPD but in the northern part of the district; the sites are planned for an elementary and a middle school. The fee title to both sites is held by the developer with the district's property interest recorded as an encumbrance on title, and would only be conveyed to the school district if the MPD materializes. The Task Face recommends that no sewer be extended to the rural portion of the site and that the City of Black Diamond and county work with the developer and the school district to site all schools associated with the MPD completely within the UGA. The Black Diamond City Council supported this solution in a resolution passed 3-1-12. The Black Dianhond City Council previously approved the Comprehensive School Mitigation Agreement identifying Enumclaw Sites A, B, and D as agreed-upon school sites. Site specific (1b). The Enumclaw School District and the developer have identified as all alternative to la the placement ofq rtion ofthe proposed school-relatedfacilities on real lands. If attempts to site each i of these schools filly within the UGA are unsuccessful, alternative lb may be contemplated. Alternative I b consists of siting all school buildings, storm water detention and other support facilities, and all poking and impervious surfaces within the UGA and limiting any development in rile adjacent rural area to bollfheldslplayfields. The Task Face jtrther recommends maintaining significant forest buffers between the ballfhelds/playfhelds and adjacent rural lands including the Black .Diamond Natural Area. Recommendation of this urba real alternative by the Task Tone is meant to address the unique circumstances of the Enumclaw A &D sites and is not to be construed as a precedent for locating schools on adjacent real lands. Consequently, it is not recommended a•any other sites. I DI.H Page 298 of 339 17486 Box B SITE DOES NOT BORDER UGA and HAS NO SEWER CONNECTION School district has an identified Overview: need for a school The Task Force recommends that alternative sites in the UGA be found for all sites in this box and site. that sewer not be extended to these sites. Because of the identified need by the school districts and the recommendation to find alternative sites, the Task Force recommends that these sites receive prioritized attention by school district,county and city decision makers. Sites and their Solutions: I Issaquah I 1. Find alternative site in the UGA Site specific: The site is a large parcel(80 acres)on May Valley Road between SquuakMountain to the north and Cedar Hills Landfill to the south. The site has conservation value. The Task Force recommends that the school district work expeditiously with King County, the City ofissaquah and the City of Renton. These partners shall work diligently to find an alternative site within the UGAthatwouldmeettheschooldistrict's need for additional capacity that development of another school would provide. The county, cities and school district should identify other partners and finding mechanisms that may allow for purchase of the properly for permanent conservation orotherrural-related :uses while also providing resources to the district for purchase of an alternative site. Enumclaw B: 1. Find alternative site in the UGA Site specific: The site is in the rural area west of the Black Diamond UGA and a master planned development (MPD) that has been approved but is yet to be constructed. The identified need of the school district is associated with the population Projections of the MPD; the site is planned for a middle school. The fee lide for the site is held by the developer, with the district's property interest recorded as an encumbrance on title, and would only be conveyed to the school district if die MPD materializes. The Task Force recommends that no sewer be extended to the site and that the City of Black Diamond and the county work with the developer and the school district to site schools associated with the MPD in the UGA. DI.H Page 299 of 339 17486 BOX C SITE BORDERS UGA or HAS SEWER CONNECTION School district does not have an Overview: identified need for Because the site in this box is not associated with an identified need,the Task Force recommends a school site. that the school district plan to develop the site consistent with Vision 2040 or manage the site as part of its capital portfolio. Site and its solution: Kent 4 1. Sell, or hold with the understanding that any future development must be consistent with Vision 2040 as implemented by King County code. I I I i DI.H Page 300 of 339 17486 BOX D SITE DOES NOT BORDER UGA and HAS NO SEWER CONNECTION School district does Overview: not have nn Because sites in this box are not associated with an identified need, the Task Force identified need for recommends that school districts plan to develop the sites consistent with Vision 2040 or a school site. manage the sites as part of their capital portfolio.The Task Force also recommends that while the school districts will ultimately determine how sites are handled, the county, cities, and other interested parties should investigate whether sites may be suitable for permanent conservation or other public purposes; if so, these entities should work to facilitate the acquisition of the properties for the identified public purposes. Solutions for sites with conservation value: i If the site is of value to the county, cities or community, facilitate the purchase, sale, or land swap of property The Task Force recommends that the county, cities and school districts investigate whether the properties may be appropriate for permanent conservation or acquisition for other public proposes. Auburn 1. The site has value for food hazard reduction. Kent 3: The site has forestland of value for environmental, social, and potentially economic benefits. Lake Washington 1. The site has value for food hazard reduction and regionally significant aquatic a, terrestrial natw•a! resources. Facilitating the sale of the property into conservation may assist with solutions for other Lake Washington sites in Box A. Northshore 1. The site has forestland of value for environmental, social, and potentially economic benefits. Solutions for sites without identified conservation value: Auburn 3,Kent 1,and Lake Washington 3 1 Sell, or hold understanding that any future development must be consistent with Vision 2040, The Task Force recommends that school districts plan to develop the sites consistent with Vision 2040 or manage the sites as part of their capital portfolio. Solution for Auburn 2: Auburn 2: The site has an existing elementary school, but no sewer extension. The school district plans to redevelop the existing elenemmy school or build a ulddle school to replace the elementary school No time f•mm has been specified. The Task Face recommends that the school district be allowed to redevelop, if no sewer connection is needed and as allowed by development regulations in place at the time ofdevelopment. DI.H Page 301 of 339 I 17486 I Note:In developing the above recommendations for schools sites, Task Force members reached out to all school districts whose service area includes rural land, even those districts not represented on the Task Force. To make sure the solutions recommended by the Task Force would encompass all known sites and create lasting solutions,school districts here asked if they owned or had interest in any rural sites not already under consideration in this process. School district representatives stated there were no additional rural sites needing to he addressed at this time. Therefore, no other sites are included and all fudure school siting should be guided by the recommendations below Recommendations for Future School Siting The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) comprehensively updated VISION 2040 in 2008. In preparation for the update, the PSRC developed an issue paper regarding Rural Areas that included a discussion on Special Purpose Districts and Institutional Uses (Appendix N). The issue paper noted that special purpose district planning is disconnected from GMA, and that many facilities(including schools) had expanded into rural areas,tatting advantage of relatively low land values and large tracts of land.The issue paper recommended that policies be established that provide regional guidance on siting special i purpose districts within rural areas. Thus, the following policies were established and incorporated into VISION 2040: MPP-PS-4 Do not provide urban services in rural areas.Design services for limited access when they are needed to solve isolated health and sanitation problems,so as not to increase the development potential of the surrounding rural area. I MPP-PS-S Encourage the design of public facilities and utilities in rural areas to be at a size and scale appropriate to rural locations,so as not to increase development pressure. MPP-PS-21 Site schools,institutions,and other community facilities that primarily serve urban populations within the urban growth area in locations where they will promote the local desired growth plan. MPP-PS-22 Locate schools,institutions,and other community facilities serving rural residents in neighboring cities and towns and design those facilities in keeping with the size and scale of the local community i Also in 2008,VISION 2040 incorporated new policies integrating public health considerations into land use and transportation planning, and addressing climate change through the regional growth strategy reducing greenhouse gas emissions by focusing growth in urban centers). i Consistent with all of the above, VISION 2040 now encourages the siting of public facilities in urban areas, and states that 'Schools should be encouraged to become the cornerstone of their communities by j locating in more urban settings and designing facilities to better integrate with their urban neighborhoods. DI.H Page 302 of 339 17486 Given the adopted policies in VISION 2040 and after consideration of the wide range of technical information presented, the Task Force recommends that all future school siting be consistent with VISION 2040. i Box E The Task Force reconuuends that all future school siting be consistent with VISION 2040. In support of this recommendation,the Task Force further recommends: 1 The Growth Management Plamung Council (GMPC) should develop policies and adopt a work program that commits jurisdictions to working together to identify future school sites within the UGA. These policies shall direct jurisdictions to use zoning and other land use tools to ensure a sufficient j supply of land for siting schools. 2. King County should wok with the school districts,community representatives,and other stakeholders to address any future redevelopment of existing schools on rural sites to accommodate school districts' needs while protecting rural character 3. The Growth Management Planning Council should add a school district representative to its membership. 4.The Puget Sound Regional Council should collaborate with counties and cities in working with school districts to ensure coordination in regional (4-county) growth management discussions (per VISION 2040 PS-Action-6). 5. The Washington State Legislature and the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction should examine, together with the State Department of Commerce, how state laws, guidelines, policies and administrative procedures can influence school siting decisions,including: a. Reconsideration of existing transportation policies and funding that incentivize busing and siting schools away from population centers b.Identifying new funding for school land acquisition,including incentives for purchases, land swaps,and other avenues for obtaining land inside the UGA c.Revising existing guidelines for school siting such that districts who build on small sites in urban areas are eligible for state snatch funds d. Increasing the compensation to school districts for the construction costs of schools sited within the UGA Note: The Task Force did not specifically consider redevelopment of existing schools on sites in the rra-al area. Redevelopment issues were not included in the Task Face scope ofwo'k. Information emerged late in the Task Force process regarding redevelopment and will be passed on to appropriate officials for consideration at a fnrta•e date.Redevelopment is addressed in 42 in Box E. DI.H Page 303 of 339 sa!o!lod2tnuueldoplmXlunoDmauaqig11mlttolslsuooamelug)suopulnoam luautdolanappuesa!ogoduuldanlsuagatdwoomauldope11!m1lounoDQunoo2u!gaqL6 uopeagpu.tJoJs9P10011101waylpuasPut!'sa!a!1odSu!uuuld ap!m.(lunoomauldopu'uopepuauwtoaams,ojwDoqimalnamIpANpounoodlwtoD2u!gaqL 'E uopumaplsuoo.naglmoJpounoD,(Iuno:)2tngaqi01sa!a!lod 2uluueidaplm,flunoDmaupuawwoowpue'lusodomds,milnaaxgaqimalnam111mOdW( ogL •z uotlemaptsuoa(OdW'J)1launo02LUMBIdluauta2uuuWylmOJDmoJsala!lod2ultwe1d ap!mX;unoDmauasodomdpuepoda210omodNsuLslylmalnam11rman!lnooxg,Ctuno2ulgaqL •I suopupuauuwoaam s,00modNsuLaqjpoddnsofsmgodmauJoluowdolanapaqiuisdalslewmoJlxouaqiamu2uimolloJaqL sda;SaxaN s)uuuoJole!idoidduaqi2u!CJiluopluo anpnoaxgAjunoD8u!xaqlofsmaJappuu'Xjoju!pawuyoouaumoa)Imomslglluglslsa22nsoomodKsaLaqL sasnpaseq-Iumnmmaglomo'aopeamoam uopenm9su032uipnlow 'sosodmnda!lgndmoJsailsleantpadolanapunJouolllsnbae2ulmoidxg sailspadolanapunmoJsdemspuel2uuoldxg Vgflaqiulsailsanpewage2ulpuld 2unpnioui 'sailsoglaadsmoJsuopulospopumumam aqiamoldxoofoqpinogsswalluolleluaumidwnlsmg0111Joauo'sueldIelouettgao/puesollopodalulsa luainagsmaplsuooam01slouls!pIoogosamtnbamIIIsuopupuawwoaams,00modseLaqi1uglSuala2ooa21 salpoq2unwuldluuo!sammslormis!ploogas2ulpnlnu!p0puau1n00msett 03iodIseLagl'uosuamsnllmod•slaplogwlulsmagloJim'sloulsiploogos'sanpagl'61unoO2ulguaanUaq uoyuwpmooa2wo2uopunXqNmomIeuoll!ppea.nnbamg!msuo!lupuawwooamasaglJouo!luluawalduq MIS.LX3NONVSNOLLVONHww0MU3J2fo3MSVyOILNaw -Idwl :9NOLLIS suo!lepuawwoaamSi!pue 'ssaaomdsl!'ilmomsllssnoslpof('o1a'spunooSp'spmuoqloogas) salpedpalswolu! gllm )Iuadsofolqujlenuonsmagwautoo.tod )IsuJ, 's2u!pugsl! oleomnwwoadlaqoL s.1aplotplelsoIS2mp(t!d93.101)lsaLOu!;ealunuturoD 99VL1 DI.H Page 304 of 339 17486 Appendices (Attached). A. Task Force Membership B Framing Work Group Membership C. Technical Advisory Committee Membership D Map of 18 Undeveloped School Sites E. GMPC Motion 11-2 i Appendices (on CV) F Matrix of Technical Information on Undeveloped Sites G Maps of Undeveloped Sites H. Demographic Information 1. Enrollment Projections Public Health Aspects of School Siting K. Technical Advisory Committee Work (13 Tasks) L. State School Siting Guidelines M. Existing Policy and Regulatory Framework i N Excerpt from PSRC Issue Paper on Rural Areas i O Land Use Planning Overview P Meeting Summaries Q Operating Protocols R. Process Schematic S. Task Force Member Interests T Interview Summary U Public Comments DI.H Page 305 of 339 410 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 GLOSSARY Affordable Housing: Housing that is affordable at 30 percent or less of a household's monthly income. This is a general term that may include housing affordable to a wide range of income levels. Agricultural Production District: A requirement of the Growth Management Act for cities and counties to designate, where appropriate,agricultural lands that are not characterized by urban growth, have soils suitable for agriculture,and that have long-term significance for commercial farming. The King County Comprehensive Plan designates Agricultural Production Districts where the principal land use should be agriculture. Area Median Income: The annual household income for the Seattle-Bellevue,WA Metro Area as published on approximately an annual basis by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. I, Buildable Lands Program: A requirement of the Growth Management Act for certain counties in western Washington to report on a regular basis the amount of residential and commercial development that has occurred,the densities of that development,and an estimate of each jurisdiction's ability to accommodate its growth target based on the amount of development that existing zoning would allow. Climate Change: The variation in the earth's global climate over time. It describes changes in the variability or average state of the atmosphere. Climate change may result from natural factors or processes(such as change In ocean circulation) or from human activities that change the atmosphere's composition (such as burning fossil fuels or deforestation.)i I Climate Change Adaptation refers to actions taken to adapt to unavoidable Impacts as a result of climate change. Climate Change Mitigation refers to actions taken to reduce the future effects of climate change. d Comprehensive Plan: A plan prepared by a local government following the requirements of the V) Washington Growth Management Act,containing policies to guide local actions regarding land 0 use,transportation, housing, utilities,capital facilities,and economic development in ways that 0 will accommodate at least the adopted 20-year targets for housing and employment growth. a Environmental Justice:The fair distribution of costs and benefits, based on a consideration for U social equity Environmental justice is concerned with the right of all people to enjoy a safe, 6 1. DI.H Page 306 of 339 WW King County Countywide Planning Policies November 1012 Amended December 3, 2012 clean,and healthy environment, and with fairness across income, ethnic, and racial groups in the siting and operation of infrastructure,facilities, or other large land uses. Forest Production District. A requirement of the Growth Management Act for cities and counties to designate, where appropriate, forest lands that are not characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the commercial production of timber The King County Comprehensive Plan designates Forest Production Districts where the primary use should be commercial forestry Growth Management Act: State law(RCW 36.70A)that requires local governments to prepare comprehensive plans(including land use,transportation, housing, capital facilities and utilities) to accommodate 20 years of expected growth. Other provisions of the Growth Management Act require developing and adopting countywide planning policies to guide local comprehensive planning in a coordinated and consistent manner I Greenhouse Gas: Components of the atmosphere that contribute to global warming, including carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,and fluorinated gases. Human activities have added to the levels of most of these naturally occurring gases. Healthy Housing: Housing that protects all residents from exposure to harmful substances and environments, reduces the risk of injury,provides opportunities for safe and convenient daily physical activity, and assures access to healthy food and social connectivity High-capacity Transit: Various types of transit systems,such as light rail and bus rapid transit, operating on fixed guideway or dedicated right-of-way designed to carry a large number of riders at higher speeds. Industry Clusters: Specific economic segments that are the focus of the Regional Economic Strategy.As of June 2011,the identified regional industry clusters included: aerospace, clean technology, Information technology, life sciences,logistics and international trade, military, and tourism. King County Open Space System: A regional system of county-owned parks, trails, natural areas,working agricultural and forest resource lands, and flood hazard management lands. Low-Income Households: Households earning between 31 percent and 50 percent of the Area Median Income for their household size. Oa Manufacturing/Industrial Centers: Designated locations within King County cities meeting 0 criteria detailed in policies DP 35-37 a a Mixed-Use Development: A building or buildings constructed as a single project which contains U more than one use, typically including housing plus retail and/or office uses. 6 2 DI.H Page 307 of 339 41A10 King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Moderate-Income Households: Households earning between 51 percent and 80 percent of the Area Median Income for their household size. Potential Annexation Area: A portion of the unincorporated urban area in King County that a city has identified it will annex at some future date. See Appendix 2: Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map. Purchase of Development Rights: Programs that buy and then extinguish development rights on a property to restrict development and limit uses exclusively for open space or resource- based activities such as farming and forestry. Covenants run with the land in perpetuity so that the property is protected from development regardless of ownership. Regional Growth Strategy: The strategy defined in VISION 2040 that was developed by the Puget Sound Regional Council to help guide growth in the four-county region that includes King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties. VISION 2040 directs most of the region's forecasted growth into designated Urban Areas, and concentrates growth within those areas in designated centers planned for a mixes of uses and connection by high-capacity transit Resource Lands: Designated areas within King County that have long-term significance for agricultural, forestry,or mining. See Appendix 1. Land Use Map. Rural Area: Designated area outside the Urban Growth Area that is characterized by small- scale farming and forestry and low-density residential development. See Appendix 1. Land Use Map. Rural Cities: Cities that are surrounded by Rural Area or Resource Lands. Rural Cities are part of the Urban Growth Area. Stormwater Management: An infrastructure system that collects runoff from storms and redirects it from streets and other surfaces into facilities that store and release it—usually back into natural waterways. Sustainable Development: Methods of accommodating new population and employment that protect the natural environment while preserving the ability to accommodate future generations. Transfer of Development Rights: Ability to transfer allowable density, in the form of permitted building lots or structures, from one property(the "sending site")to another(the "receiving O site") in conjunction with conservation of all or part of the sending site as open space or working farm or forest. a Transportation 2040: A 30-year action plan for transportation investments in the central Puget U Sound region intended to support implementation of VISION 2040. 6 3 DI.H Page 308 of 339 Aje King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Transportation Demand Management: Various strategies and policies(e.g. incentives, regulations) designed to reduce or redistribute travel by single-occupancy vehicles in order to make more efficient use of existing facility capacity Transportation System: A comprehensive, integrated network of travel modes(e.g.airplanes, automobiles, bicycles, buses, feet, ferries,freighters, trains,trucks)and infrastructure (e.g. sidewalks, trails, streets, arterials, highways,waterways,railways, airports)for the movement of people and goods on a local, regional, national and global scale. Universal Design: A system of design that helps ensure that buildings and public spaces are accessible to people with or without disabilities. Urban Centers: Designated locations within King County cities meeting criteria detailed in Development Pattern chapter policies 31-32. I Urban Growth Area: The designated portion of King County that encompasses all of the cities as well as other urban land where the large majority of the county's future residential and employment growth is intend to occur See Appendix 1. Land Use Map. Very Low-Income Households: Households earning 30 percent of the Area Median Income or less for their household size. l VISION 2040: The integrated, long-range vision for managing growth and maintaining a healthy region—including the counties of King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish. It contains an environmental framework a numeric Regional Growth Strategy,the Multicounty Policies,and implementation actions and measures to monitor progress. Water Resource Inventory Area: Major watershed basins in Washington identified for water- related planning purposes.I Workforce Housing: Housing that is affordable to households with one or more workers. Creating workforce housing in a jurisdiction implies consideration of the wide range of income j levels that characterize working households, from one person working at minimum wage to two or more workers earning the average county wage or above. There is a particular need for workforce housing that is reasonably close to regional and sub-regional job centers and/or easily accessible by public transportation. O I 0 R. U 6 4 DI.H Page 309 of 339 DI.H Page 310 of 339 L41 King County Metropolitan King County Council Committee of the Whole REVISED STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6 Name:Kendall Moore Proposed No% 2012-0282 Date: November 26 2012 Invited: Paul Reitenbach, GMPC staff coordinator Karen Wolf, Executive's office SU JECT A proposed ordinance adopting Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") recommended revisions to the King County Countywide Planning Policies ("CPPs"), including changes to he Potential Annexation Area ("PAA") map. COMMITTEE ACTION On November 26, 2012 the committee voted out Proposed Ordinance 2012-0282 as amended with a "do pass" recommendation. BACKGROUND Please see October 29, 2012 staff report. A ALYSIS Attached to this staff report as Attachment 4 is a matrix identifying all the changes made to the CPPs that are proposed by the striking amendment. The only addition to the changes described at the October 29, 2012 committee meeting is the change found at page 33 of the CPPs, which is new text to provide the reader context for jobs housing balance strategy called out in policy H-9 (CPPs, page 33), as well as in the Housing Appendix at page 57 As reported in the discussion at the October 29, 2012 committee meeting, these changes were reviewed by the interjuridictional team ("ITJ') members, who are staff to the GMPC No objections to the changes were received.' i At the October 26 meeting several members commented that these changes improved the document's clarity and readability 1 of 2 DI.H Page 311 of 339 i AMENDMENT the changes discussed at the October 29, 2012AnewAttachmentA, incorporating committee meeting has been prepared. Additionally as also discussed at that committee meeting, .a striking amendment has been prepared to make code changessothatlistingeveryGMPCactionandratificationbytheCouncilwillnolongercalledoutincode. The proposal is to decodify those listing sections in the code rather thanrepeal, so that history will be preserved. This approach is similar to what is proposedfortheComprehensivePlancodesectionsthatlistthehistoryofamendmentstothe Comprehensive Plan. I I I 2of2 DI.H Page 312 of 339 KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse k1m 616'rhird Avenue Signature Report Seattle,WA 98104 King County December 3, 2012 Ordinance 17467 Proposed No.2012-0436.2 Sponsors Phillips 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting Growth Management Planning 2 Council Motion 12-5 and ratifying Motion 12-5 for I3unincorporatedKingCounty 4 STATEMENT OF PACTS: 5 1 The Countywide Planning Policies("CPPs")are adopted in accordance 6 with the state Growth Management Act,under 36.70A.210 RCW 7 2. The Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC")was formed in 8 1992 to guide the development of the CPPs. The GMPC is a 9 representative body of elected officials from King County,the city of 10 Seattle, the city of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities Association. 11 Representatives of the special districts serve as ex officio members. 12 3 The CPPs establish a framework for guiding development in all King 13 County jurisdictions. 14 4. The CPPs are deemed adopted when ratified by King County and the 35 requisite number of cities and satisfying the required population 16 percentage. 17 5. The GMPC recommends CPP amendments to the King County council 18 for consideration,possible revision and ratification. 19 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 1 DI.H Page 313 of 339 Ordinance 17487 20 SECTION 1. Findings: 21 A. On June 6,2012,the Growth Management Planning Council introduced i 22 Motion 12-5 listing the proposed changes to the urban growth area then under 23 consideration by the King County Council and accepted public testimony regarding the 24 proposed changes. 25 B. On September 11,2012,the Growth Management Planning Council approved 26 Motion 12-5 following additional public testimony regarding the proposed changes to the 27 urban growth area. 28 C. Attachment A to this ordinance incorporates Motion 12-5. 29 SECTION 2. The amendments to 2012 King County Planning Policies, as shown i i I 2 DI.H Page 314 of 339 Ordinance 17487 30 in Attachment A to this ordinance, are hereby adopted and ratified on behalf of the 31 population of unincorporated King County 32 Ordinance 17487 was introduced on 10/29/2012 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 12/3/2012, by the following vote: i Yes: 9- Mr. Phillips,Mr. von Reichbauer,Mr. Gossett,Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert,Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Dunn and Mr. McDermott No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON i Gossett, hair ATTEST I Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council APPROVED this (?dayof P . 2012. I Dow Constantine,County Executive Attachments:A.Motion No. 12-5 3 DI.H Page 315 of 339 17487 ATTACHMENT A 9/11/12 Decision: Approved Sponsored By Executive Committee pr 1 MOTION NO. 12-5 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 5 6 7 WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act,RCW 36.70A.110 requires 8 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 9 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature;and 10 I 1 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 12 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area;and 13 14 WHEREAS,the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council 15 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to 16 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 17 and ratification by the cities; and 18 19 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 20 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventuall annexation of these areas by 21 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city 22 23 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 24 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS, 25 26 1 Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the 27 Countywide Planning Policies,the Potential Annexation Area map, as depicted on the 28 following attached maps: 29 30 Attachment 1 Sammamish—Soaring Eagle 31 Attachment 2: Snoqualmie—Mining Site 32 Attachment 3 Auburn— 148h Ave. SE technical correction 33 Attachment 4 Black Diamond—212'"Ave. SE technical correction 34 Attachment 5 Redmond—NE Union Hill Road/196"Ave NE technical correction 35 Attachment 6:Black Diamond—Lake Sawyer Road SE tecbnical correction 36 Attaclunent 7• Renton—SE Old Petrovitski Road technical correction 1 - DI.H Page 316 of 339 17487 1 Attachment 8:Maple Valley—SE 281"Way technical correction 2 Attachment 9•Maple Valley—SE 288"St.technical correction 3 Attachment 10:Enumclaw—SE 440"St.technical correction 4 Attachment 11.North Bend—SE 142v4 St.technical correction 5 Attachment 12:North Bend—SE 150"ST technical correction 6 Attachment 13:Auburn—SE Green Valley Road technical correction 7 Attachment 14:Duvall—SR 203/NE 140"St.technical correction 8 Attachment 15:Maple Valley split parcel 9 10 11 2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional 12 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential 13 Annexation Area of the adjoining city, and deleting any land changed from urban to 14 rural from the respective PAA. 15 16 3 These amendments are recommended to the King County Council and the Cities of 17 King County for adoption and ratification. 18 19 20 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session 21 on September 11,2012 and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 22 23 24 j 25 Dow Constantine, Chair,Growth Management Planning Council 26 27 I i 2 - DI.H Page 317 of 339 i Attachment 1 Soaring Eagle Recommended Land Use Map King County ptpMynl°IO•rtlpm•N•n0 bN°hnM•16.n1a. TM hlwwl0n kMtleE°n Ha W,M1N b.n tuppAM b/ y„ O,pV•b^^°^`•^^•n°'•°°•e"•°°°bu.% OS KC Open space system t;..7 Incorporated Areas9MN11[8[1. IMq Cpu1Y+ Mtl+ pn+lMtlEnf LL mnu+,.pnn ar hppna,u a.upon.oNpbl.M,,,op Other ParkstvVildemess 1tn Jp{pmnl b Mt HeMIU W vs.....u..y rp°pa Urban Growth BoundaryKrycronysNIMap•nb W uY p..wt W 4.N m 1. al hk .. e.txit p- nwtty Mew usa Q Y/ a mW+.tlbl.hbml.WnO"P b oava.-P MYy. n Study AreaGm.p er Fbmulbn on NO mp b plMWlrf.It.p by When rllmbtkn dkhp COUMy. Dale:Jw 25.M12 yY Proposed Urban tpla1,a,tn.jvd, antz0t2_Ct,t,prw,u'lywnswl:1peap'e rpe MY,INSd Growth Boundary 0 top noo Xp1,n 3M C(WSMm12ot2_CanpphMde[reryt9oercpEepb,a ALw pEI ry Neeomesp Feel I l os 1 Op 4ti'-'—•SE9TMWAY :» 1 1 jSammamish ED r N N t' 127N,ST/ 1. h TN.ST 1°.` 14;. DI.H Page 318 of 339 Attachment 2 17487 Snoqualmie - Mining LN Recommended Land Use Map King County P1p,MwMal MVbgw W,n• FnrFww.,nW6m!aa la,Nb,m>fw nwam an mb n+P a>,w>n .0w W ItFq Caunry C.Rlmm,whry o!>ww W afv'dnab M>Ns ama naK.. wn, cwar mlxw w nw•>•^aw^. rX Rural Cities Urban Growth Area L.._ Incorporated Areas nnw>.•wn,>a NPCM.u b,<nnn,mR{Llw•s>, awn,mepn. a y. ie n• w el vR nanYlon. ra Rural Area ov C."Ily a wl V1.140 b, F w w. ..n,..r wwwl. UI'b011 Growth BoundaryIon) cowry 4 as a uae a. w p•nv,i. .p.a. m Mining Iv.•a anneaa e. , Iwn• ma R'MIX" Rws'o.ra na N imlw b.1u1 merve>n b>I MR' 04 ' rxn w wanaW.a m.nrwpwn wnaapa pn w rtip.Nn>.a a OS King County Open Space System aF>R4pmnamuwnwua m.pavla.waea•waar lu•n Change wlnvubnaKK9 CVw.1/. Dxe,Aawu n,2012 7. P Proposed Urban 1blsnas11p1go<.wa.sVeu_canPPl VRoiea,l$I Vnft"MVMxtl Growth Boundary 0 2M W R9tsnas llpgMSbhsV012_COmpPImlOelnenf5mpoafnkM1fKy pd Frrl f4ccomnP 3F5+5 o m 390TH•AVE•sE-) Portion of P 2024089017 20 D89D17 402NO-AVE'SS M ra X SE•59TH-S'T d SE,80TH•S-1 POAbn of 2024089020 02400901 N r rX DI.H Page 319 of 339 Attachment 9 17487 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - 148th Avenue SE T- PrIvate-Rd Move UGB to east margin of ROW to include entire road segment in urban area. Road is already maintained by City.of Auburn. M, N 4. Auburn Urban Growth Line County Roads Parcels Cities Unincorporated Area 125 62.6 0 126 Feet King County May 10,2011 DI.H Page 320 of 339 Attachment 4 17487 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - 212th Avenue SE C. 3352 - - Lu OF t Move UGB to west ROW margin to include entire road in Urban Area. 1Z L I Kent 7 Right of Way Issue u B(aok Diamond 1. o:,'Urban Growth Line County Roads a I o Parcels a Nu— Cities d Unincorporated Area u King Countyw.wr-.••••-•+-290 145 0 280 Feet May 10.2071 tyo„weeuw,.tronamgxrtp,ma. MYµur DI.H Page 321 of 339 Attachment 5 17487 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - NE Union Hill Road e NE•Unlon*HIIhRd 968O3 o Move UGB to north margin of NE Union Hill Road ROW I to include entire road in Urban Area. Redmond w Move UG6 to west margin of 196th Ave NE ROW to include i entire road in Rural Area. CCD e-on.e-a-c-o-a-o-o-p-e.aa.a.m.n-n-o-osa:aa-c- e I Privale-Rd Reddmond NE U°r Hill q Right of Way Issue 0 2m NE 76th St n°gnn N Urban GraWlh Line p i County Roads e a t Parcels cities 1l Unincorporated Area e.- lq « no es 0 170 Feet King County FS `^.,'• °"••"""'wi.,.$.°.:.<' May 10.2011 e.evwa..i.nun°tvssm+pxevamm DI.H Page 322 of 339 17487 Attachment 6 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - Lake Sawyer Rd SE i. 4 t L A316 ROW marginMoveUGStowest to include road in urban area. l Bldck.Dia Oita j AA- 4 1,'j IP t I L L_LIJ, Blqoilf Dijin'o. nof Right of Way Issue Urban Growth I-Ine County Roads Parcels Roberts Or N cities Unincorporated Area 340 no 0 340 Feet L-g King County May 10,2011 DI.H Page 323 of 339 17487 Attachment 7 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues -SE Old Petrovitsky Road II r r EH-84th-9tawrrngs-serwea-Tia- Move UGB to south margin of ROW to include road in Urban Area e a 5,. .'Y.. n Renton I, I Right of Way Issue rn n ue Urban Growth Line County Roads Parcels H N Cities 311 Unincorporated Area Kent 230 116 0 230 Feet Lg-King Countyr`-" `+`—M- May 10.2011 r ew.aaumem ,s DI.H Page 324 of 339 Attachment 8 17487 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - SE 281st Way Z 9lh_W-. it l bab wr 0 .";y [_-•< Ple-Rid9e-Dr s ' ' '`•'b. t- a=y` y 3• SE279th-PI i v;gff Move UGB-to south ROW margin to include road in Urban Area I;IF?aWlelValfey n- ;:BE gg KenbKen9loy Rd i J'!.11 Cent .I I Parcels rl Urban Growth Line Right of Way Issue County Roads N Cities Unincorporated Area B lack Diam nd King CountyH"6aa.•nh3 ; .' °.+'..w.d. 900 160 0 900 Feet May 10.2011 vma .au.wrncc+sm,e++:.a DI.H Page 325 of 339 17407 Attachment 9 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - SE 288th Street I l ap! Hay__ W m a:Move UGB to south ROW margin. to include entire road In Urban Area. NSF i I SE 2'88thK5t'D:3•3°7$'IQ mu i'6omro Dfampn' F•'. i T iVlaple';1/a1 Qy H.Nx Kent I SE 2861h at I Right of Way Issues rte o 0 o Urban Growth Lino County Roads r Parcels Black Diamond QIt1eS I• j N I Unincorporated Area 270 195 0 270 Feel Lg King County May 10,2011 xx.amwulweucwsm.Wlewrm.a DI.H Page 326 of 339 Attachment 10 17487 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - SE 440th Street Lu a,--- Move UGB to north`margin of ROW to include entire road in Urban Area. a I I\ t I I'm °O VIM"a w 0 0-0 n R..p-0-13-0 2-13 a SE 440th it f. I i rl L I LL McHugh Ave ;56432nd7 N Right of Way Issue Urban Growth Line w n n9 s Enumclaw a L _ County Roads Rrey o N 1 Parceis q° r/ N SR 410 I_ Si2410 i Cities Unincorporated Area F I I 1 pWr,elJ ab ern a unM)IM e/3 no es 0 170 Feet King County May put 1 y.......x.-..x--+..A>.+.a Y 10, e. m.a 4M bnpnvnVM nrb DI.H Page 327 of 339 Proposed Revision to UGBL For Informational Use only SE 142nd Street section 15, Township 23, Range 8 E City of North Bend e!nL(A North Bend Potential SE 14o,r T—Sr Annexation AreaSr SE-140T--H St LU KC Maintained 1-90 IV Current UGBL1-90 AorProposedRevisiontoUGSL Proposed UGBL UGBL 9t I SE 142NDTT 42 NO-ST-- King County 260 126 0 250 500 Feet M*ove UGB,to north margin of ROW June 21.2011 to include road in Rural Area. The Wwme4m tr UdW an V mp hm t pJW bv Road serves rural properties. n&, 10.1= P k ma 7NT-- X DI.H Page 328 of 339 r i r---I i j Proposed Revision 1 ' ` to UGBL i For Informational Use Only i SE 150th Street Section 24, Township 23 I I Range 8 E 90 SF410 . j City of North Bend t _— _— —_ -- RThe gY I r1j'th B63i13 t' I' SE 144TH•ST N KC Maintained F' SOrys i W' 4 Ae Current UGBL Q Proposed UGBL I A' III ISE 146TH ST C/GSC i 190 King Co my Move UGB to north ROW margin itoincluderoadinRuralArea r—. _ _250125 0 250 500Fe t Road serves rural properties TgInbmtabn Ltl.0 m ft map Ins peso cmnplW by 1 an0 wnty sm'fmnarMeHasavcn mdkwaaab dimWwMpulnwa. I I4n9CWnrymtlws nn reprasatmYwsawarmtlm.maws iI i -`' - tmplagmmararary.<amplaamw.dmeutea.argrcs I mote umawA m(umabn. I meEOmtwrtth na MmEOEfauwaewrvayamw. bW I j pn9CwnH]ul mtW aaEla r««M genes s9ritmtQ11iYtawa.l ckmrA.asmswtawtl mvnsges .drt 1 pd 9m'bEb.loIIrwanvasdf bIIprMtt nwMgham Cls r-._.• 1 W `--_ .____ uwamYVStaltamlmmabn cmbinWmNkavq. arrystlpa mb mry aWamdM on gtls m Is aentlua Q I aaxgwnlon petmk9glt al]nq cnumr. D co- 5E-7531RD.S7- W s E r s V. 33 iY •. Nt Y.itJiHMM.n-UraiA F.41rt< eum jai DI.H Page 329 of 339 I 17487 Attachment 13 l Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - SE Green Valley Road Move UGB to south ROW margin to include road in Rural Area. All other segments of SE Green Valley Road are rural. a-.. .... S Re Xl . f ` .Auburi; N Right of Way Issue any°y SR 164 Urban Growth Line Auburn County Roads j Parcels Cities 1r Unincorporated Area 1 110 66 0 170 Feet King County Z" '"•"•'t^=%^`^= Ma 10,2011 1~rwni4m.+Mhm-•n'w+y M1CaoVwtlu4xveYla!G SmadxNr/na0 DI.H Page 330 of 339 17487 Attachment 14 Urban Growth Boundary Right of Way Issues - SR 203 & NE 140th Street psi afeWa 11 e i Du,Jall 1 Yg Eot g'%` e; Move UCsB to east margin of SR 203 ROW to include all ROW for NE 140th Street in a_ Urban Area and eliminate 1 e oprhaned ROW segment. I N It) 4. I NE 1,49th 91" bUV ll w yNE 143rtl PI t Jt1EAA01h St Y1 1 11(f9lg Rock i y.\ a n Urban Growth Line County Roads L_1 Parcels cities Unincorporated Area Ii King County90As090Feat May 70,2017 •„ww w..vrraas..yx.:•,e.a DI.H Page 331 of 339 i Attachment 15 17487 t.. ,.. ._ ^vr:-..roc...... ..... ....... r .. Ma' I'e 1%all'e. MG R'euis.ion If. ' p did ya r: n•aossooco r Wrtj htlG,roviit1) L:ihe' . 502 gTIiP Maple Valley R-4 a CI 2431 N1+y Cuuniq J 0010111 0051M4NTS:PaRe191098600$0Is IoUUy,cAlhin Ind City of Maple Valley:.Ifowom.MUQq I doesmlconfdtm to I)o Cllyojq sd Cu0AWh0uhpo7. Th.I m.l lh edodm n meq 4a+4ron rortpL'.C bJ Nlarlmra'tarnN uaN,4onieranwl1a W"gleM saeleabaurg.ni WnaK.:NbqCamyma4rerorrppnn+M+tb .awvrLgia;uCfeua L? Cleealaagrnaryitanpbbneu, UmJINU;atlyMfbine wo OliWiNtrmaem. -Y 1 yid TNi q[SUnenibnolbLMd Wuiv.aetwv.YMaOUtt.qrg.MhenoleefeN.le(,en)'q.nryalpwali lJl6rat41MEaial,uruutvenfal j. ! 'oam.q.s btNbe!q,N.MIX30 lo.b+l mvnw+ar ba pogb t.vY lroT b.u+damvn.a th LJOrenetlan unmoed4,li m D:/ury.ae of i li<in I.VDUnt'all.prw«WOrmeeon mgiaRUp l+)rM'GkE a+ePoleY mvl+npmissMOf Kry COUnH.' 1' :.1. 1.g1. r' .y OeI.d2ik012;,--Swru.Nbp Comryl4UP,-PragnNlrGamaocA(NbYdnhrmeUWO_goaGlY.i1Mp ,.. _.. , .. 1 r DI.H Page 332 of 339 a ELM King County Metropolitan King County Council Committee of the Whole REVISED STAFF REPORT Agenda Item- Name:Kendall Moore Proposed No: 2012-0436 Date: November 26, 2012 Invited Paul Reitenbach, GMPC staff coordinator Karen Wolf, Executive's office I SUBJECT I Adoption of the UGA and PAA1 map amendment recommendations by the Growth Management Planning Council COMMITTEE ACTION On November 26, 2012 the committee voted out Proposed Ordinance 2012-0436 as amended with a "do pass" recommendation. SYNOPSIS Adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2012-0436 would approve and ratify for the population of unincorporated King County the recommendations made by the Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") relevant moving the Urban Growth Boundary ("UGB") in 15 different instances, none of which are controversial. These changes have already been forwarded as part of the King County Comprehensive Plan ("KCCP") Update for consideration. Additionally, except for the split parcel correction (Attachment 15 to GMPC Motion 12-5) all have been subject to the County's KCCP public review and no one has opposed these changes. Additionally, no one testified at the GMPC hearing in opposition to these changes. BACKGROUND At its June 6, 2012 meeting, the GMPC took up for consideration Motion 12-5 listing the proposed changes to the Urban Growth Area ("UGA") then under consideration by the King County Council and accepted public testimony regarding the proposed changes. No one testified against the proposals. UGA is the acronym for Urban Growth Area and PAA is the acronym for Potential Annexation Area. I of 8 DI.H Page 333 of 339 On September 11, 2012, the GMPC approved Motion 12-5 following additional public testimony regarding the proposed changes to the UGA. Again, no one testified against the proposals. ANALYSIS 1 GMPC Motion 12-5 Attachment 1 (Soaring Eanle)2 The proposal would change the from Rural to Urban a 29 9 acre portion of Soaring Eagle Park and add it to the Potential Annexation Area ("PAA") of the City of Sammamish. It is expected that a later time, the ownership of the parcel will be transferred from King County to the City and an interlocal agreement would ensure that this property to be permanently kept in park use. This will allow the City to annex the subject property and develop it with an active recreation city park. KCCP Policy U-104 supports this changes The transfer will result in a public benefit in the form of a city park with restrooms served by public sewers. i I. i i i i I s All of the map amendments recommended by the GMPC in Motion 12-5 were included in the striking amendment to Proposed Ordinance 2012-0103, the 2012 Updates to the King County Comprehensive Plan, 3 U-104 Rural properties that are immediately adjacent to a city and are planned or designated for park purposes by that city may be redesignated to urban when the city has committed to designate the properly in perpetuity in a form satisfactory to the King County Council for park purposes and: a. The property is no more than 30 acres in size and was acquired by the city prior to 1994; b. The property is no more than 30 acres in size and receives county support through a park or recreation facility transfer agreement between King County and a city; or c. The property is or was formerly a King County park and is being or has been transferred to a city 2 of 7 DI.H Page 334 of 339 Soaring Eagle Recommended Land Use Map Kur..s Os KC OPan^ -System tr crporated Areas Op Other P~MWemess uI Growth 6 .,y i..O':` ±'. 4.»•< ... wr... Nw.,.. swdy Prey N.0, Gm%slhBBoundary euGmMhBowdary I Os i r w Is w Y Op AV w X j r 14 it r Z2, Sammamish 3: h it 3of8 DI.H Page 335 of 339 i 2. GMPC Motion 12-5 Attachment 2: (Snogualmie Mininq Site) This recommendation would change the land use designation from Urban (and in Snoqualmie's PAA) to Rural for a portion of parcel 2024089017 and all of parcel 2024089020 Both of these properties contain a long-term mining operation and are zoned Mining. Both the City and the property owner, Weyerhaeuser, support the change. KCCP Policies also support this change: R-510,^ which calls for land designated in a Rural City's PAA should be planned and developed with urban uses, not mining activity R-676,5 support the designating existing mining sites as a Designated Mineral Resource. By definition designated Resource Lands are not within the Urban Area. i 1 l I I 4 In substantive part, R-510 The cities in the rural area and their Urban Growth Areas are considered part of the overall Urban Growth Area for purposes of planning land uses and facility needs. e In substantive part, R-676 King County shall identify existing and potential mining sites on the Mineral Resources Map in order to conserve mineral resources, promote compatibility with nearby land uses, protect environmental quality maintain and enhance mineral resource industries and serve to notify property owners of the potential for mining activities. The county shall identify' a. Sites with existing Mineral zoning as Designated Mineral Resource Sites; 4of7 DI.H Page 336 of 339 Snoqualmle Mining Recommended Land Use Map K dy c,Il'k"6w:0— :•n f% Rural Cities Urban GroiAh Area = lnoorpciated Areas ra Rural Area I'nl Mining 1'.i-' Obw Gadh Boundaryrm u... w.+a......w..n+....a r•n OS K'ep Camry m ChangeOpenSpaceSyste N Mw.N..nM..1Y.Ni..l.ury,.a.lr Q GnQY Yiw I.Yi4NI I M.* Proposed Urbanus...g..rr.b!]ewJ.a.:.P`W`uv.;c..v`a..wanx+w i.tv w,J..s`:• s.W GraiM Bounda o ,w Yw W.4rNaOlMnwNi1),W.YIMIYUJm.u.eu]'ila'w 111nW.i+1.VnN/rc ry Iw. KYOYN.Y I 1!1 i M i npO1 n:L`.t hike el hrm61 e]+]t9011 e].pfWlt aulu n].E 51. M ra X i WT rt Y vwsonM V a:+os:o]a o:aolsos \ ra F I l rX E i' 5 of 7 DI.H Page 337 of 339 3. GMPC Motion 12-5 Attachments 3-14. (ROW/UGA Technical Corrections) Pursuant to T-2056, King County Department of Transportation determined 12 segments of King County road rights-of-way ("ROW') should be redesignated on the KCCP Land Use map for the purposes of efficient future road maintenance. In eight cases, the ROW segment should be included within the UGA so that the adjacent city will have long-term maintenance responsibility In three cases, the ROW segment should be included in the Rural Area, since King County will continue to have maintenance responsibility One case involves two segments; one should be designated Rural and the other Urban to clarify maintenance responsibility between King County and the City of Redmond. Map Amendments r These map amendments are attached to this staff report as part of Attachment A to proposed Ordinance 2012-0436. Redesignate from Rural to Urban. i 1481h Ave SE, adjacent to Auburn 212th Ave SE, west of Black Diamond NE Union Hill Road, east of Redmond Lake Sawyer road SE, west of Black Diamond SE Old Petrovitsky Road, east of Renton SE 281St Way, east of Maple Valley SE 288th Street, south of Maple Valley SE 440th Street, north of Enumclaw SR 203 at NE 140th Street, south of Duvall. I Redesignate from Urban to Rural: 196th Ave NE, east of Redmond SE 142nd Street, south of North Bend SE 1501h Street, south of North Bend SE Green Valley Road, northeast of Auburn 4. GMPC Motion 12-5 Attachment 15: Maple Valley Split Parcel Council Staff discovered a split parcel in the city of Maple Valley during their review of the map amendments for the 2012 KCCP Updates.7 This developed parcel, located within a subdivision totally within the city limits of Maple Valley, shows up on the UGA map with the UGB running through it, resulting in half designated Urban and half e T-205 Any segment of a county roadway that forms the boundary between the Urban Growth Area and the Rural Area shall be designed and constructed to urban roadway standards on both sides of such roadway segment. 7 This map amendment was not included as an area study for the 2012 KCCP Update; however, it is a technical change rather than substantive change and merely corrects the UGA map to reflect the existing conditions on the ground. 6 of 7 DI.H Page 338 of 339 designated Rural. This change results in the parcel being completely within the Urban Area. This map amendment is attached to this staff report as part of Attachment A to proposed Ordinance 2012-0436. The change comports with KCCP Policy U-103.8 AMENDMENT A striking amendment has been prepared to comport this legislation with the revisions to the code that are included in the striking amendment for Proposed Ordinance 2012- 0282. As members will recall, the striking amendment to Proposed Ordinance 2012- 0282 will simplify the King County Code changes so that listing every GMPC action and ratification by the Council will no longer called out in Code. The striking amendment to Proposed Ordinance 2012-0282 will decodify those listing sections in the Code rather than repeal them, so that history will be preserved This approach is similar to what is proposed for the Comprehensive Plan code sections that list the history of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the section in the transmitted proposed ordinance reflecting the history of past GMPC and Council action relative to CPP amendments are not necessary and have been removed. Findings are added to set the context, i i i e U-103 Parcels which are split by the Urban Growth Area boundary line should be redesignated to either all urban or all rural unless the parcel is split to recognize environmentally sensitive features or the requirements of interlocal agreements or King County plans. This parcel was not split for environmental reasons or as a result of planning or agreements with the City Maple Valley supports this change. 7of7 DI.H Page 339 of 339