HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-22-2013 PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA
Planning and Community Development
July 22, 2013 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
1. Presentation
Parks and Recreation Board
Parks, Arts, and recreation Director Daryl Faber will provide a presentation on the
2013 plans and activities of the Parks and Recreation Board.
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes - July 8, 2013* (Tate)
III.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. City of Auburn Bicycle Route and Trail Map* (Chamberlain/Yao)
Review the draft bicycle route and trail map developed by the Bicycle Task Force.
B. City of Auburn Floodplain Management* (Andersen)
This is the fourth briefing to the Committee regarding floodplain management in the City
of Auburn. Staff will provide an overview of the City's flood control, flood event
preparation, and flood response activities.
C. Mixed Use Development Standards - C-1, Light Commercial Zone*
(Tate/Chamberlain)
Staff to provide an update of the schedule and overview of the concept that will be the
subject of a Planning Commission public hearing.
D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Strategic Plan* (Tate/Chamberlain)
Staff to discuss the preferred format and layout for both Plans and to review a draft
Request For Qualifications that is designed to solicit consultant interest and qualifications
for a consultant to assist the City in its visioning exercise.
E. Parking Vehicles on Unimproved Surfaces in Residential Communities* (Tate)
Staff will discuss the existing zoning standards that regulate parking of cars, boats,
recreational vehicles, and trucks on residential lawns. This discussion will be facilitated
using a series of photographic examples.
F. Director's Report (Tate)
G. PCDC Status Matrix* (Tate)
IV.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
Page 1 of 37
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the
City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes - July 8, 2013
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
July 8, 2013 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Planning and Community Development Committee to approve the minutes of the July 8, 2013
Planning and Community Development Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 37
Planning and Community
Development
July 8, 2013 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Nancy Backus called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. in Annex
Conference Room 2 located on the second floor of One Main Professional
Plaza, One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chair Nancy Backus, Councilmember Osborne (sitting in for Vice-
Chair Holman), and Member Largo Wales were present. Vice-Chair
Holman is excused. Also present were Interim Planning and
Development Director Jeff Tate, Planning Manager Elizabeth
Chamberlain, Project Engineer Ryan Vondrak, Traffic Engineer James
Webb, and Planning and Development Secretary Tina Kriss.
Members of the audience present: Scot Pondelick, Planning
Commissioner Yolanda Trout, Jean Lix, Russ Campbell, Susan
Weihe, Hank Galmish, and Robert Whale of the Auburn Reporter.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no agenda modifications.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes - June 24, 2013 (Tate)
Member Wales moved to approved the June 24, 2013 meeting
minutes as written, Chair Backus concurred.
Motion carried unanimously. 2-0
III. ACTION
A. Public Works Project No. CP0616 (Vondrak)
Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 3 to Contract No. 12-21 in the Amount
of $0.00 and Accept Construction of Project No. CP0616 Downtown
Pedestrian Kiosks.
Page 1 of 5
CA.A Page 4 of 37
Project Engineer Ryan Vondrak provided a briefing of Public Works
Project No. CP0616. The Downtown Pedestrian Kiosks project
constructed 3 kiosks at 1) W Main Street and the Interurban Trail, 2)
1st ST SW and S Division Street, and 3) The Transit
Center. Construction was consistent with the budget. Committee and
staff reviewed the locations and costs of the kiosks. The Committee
discussed the design, expense and locations of additional kiosks.
Councilmember Osborne moved and Member Wales seconded to
recommend City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 3 to Contract
No. 12-21, Project No. CP0616, Downtown Pedestrian Kiosks.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0
B. Resolution No. 4965 - The Outlet Collection Street Name Change
(Tate)
Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain provided a brief background
on Resolution No. 4965. As part of the rebranding of the Supermall to
the Outlet Collection Glimcher has requested renaming the
private street name from "Supermall" to "Outlet Collection".
Member Wales moved and Councilmember Osborne seconded to to
recommend City Council adopt Resolution No. 4965.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Transportation Impact Fees (Webb)
Traffic Engineer James Webb provided the Committee with staff's
recommendations for updating the Transportation Impact Fee
(TIP) program. A handout with changes recommended by the Public
Works Committee to the Auburn 2013 Draft Transportation Impact Fee
Table and Page 19 of the Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
were provided. The Committee and staff reviewed the changes to the
traffic impact fee rate schedule and the fee comparisons to other
nearby cities.
Traffic Engineer Webb explained the updates assist the program in
being consistent with the projects funding needs identified in the
adopted 2014-2019 TIP.
Staff will be taking this back to the Public Works Committee for action
on July 15, 2013 and forward to Council the same evening if the
Committee is supportive of the updates.
B. Proposed Amendment to Auburn City Code Title 18 (Chamberlain)
Page 2 of 5
CA.A Page 5 of 37
Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain provided the Committee
with background information regarding the proposed amendment to
Auburn City Code (ACC) Title 18.
After meeting with the Planning and Community Development
Committee (PCDC) on June 24, 2013 regarding an amendment to the
definition of "family" in Auburn City Code Title 18, Committee
expressed a concern in making any changes to the definition of
“family” and requested staff look at alternatives, possibly removing the
definition of “family” altogether.
The Committee and staff reviewed and discussed several options in
the approach to address student/rental housing and boardinghouses
within ACC. The Committee agreed that they would not break the
project into two phases but that they would immediately begin to
review all the code amendments needed to address student/rental
housing at one time. Committee and staff provided the following action
steps:
• The Committee is supportive of holding Special PCDC meetings, if needed,
to address student/rental housing and discuss code and policy changes.
• The Committee is supportive of staff working with the City of Auburn’s Legal
Department to develop a standardized protocol for the code enforcement of
rental housing. As part of the process, code updates may be recommended
to establish some additional tools, staff will bring any recommendations
forward to the Committee as needed.
• The Committee would like staff to discuss updating the Auburn City
Business License form to include student rentals as part of the updates.
• The Committee would like to discuss the option of limiting the number of
people in a rental houses based on the square footage of the rental.
• The Committee would like to discuss the option of eliminating a business
license if the owner is non-compliant with ACC regarding rental housing
regulations.
• The Committee recommends that staff develop a program task list for future
discussions on student/rental housing.
Chair Backus invited the audience members wishing to speak on this
topic to come forward.
Hang Galmish, 12443 SE 318th Way, Auburn.
Mr. Galmish thanked the Committee for taking the student/rental
housing issues seriously. He emphasized that in addition to respecting
students it is important to respect the property owners home values
Page 3 of 5
CA.A Page 6 of 37
and quality of life. The cost of having student rental housing has
weighed heavily on the homeowners, the property value and quality of
life have diminished.
Russ Campbell, 31606 126th Ave SE, Auburn.
Mr. Campbell stated in August of 2010 he came to the City to complain
about student/rental housing safety issues. He emphasized that if the
issues can not be resolved by August or September of 2013, the City
should continue to resolve the issue rather than waiting another year.
Mr. Campbell stated he met with Cyndi Rapier of GRCC and she
stated that the college is no longer promoting, advertising, or
recommending students use the homeshare program. If the program is
continuing it is likely through private individuals.
The Committee emphasized that the intent is not to preclude someone
from generating revenue in a rental home as long as the rental home
is in compliance with ACC in an appropriate way.
Jean Lix, 31606 126th Ave SE, Auburn.
Ms. Lix stated that she has lived in her Lea Hill home since 1983 as a
single parent. She thought the purchase of a single-family home near
a community college would be beneficial. She now believes there at
least 10 student rental homes in phase one and two of her sub-
division. Ms. Lix believes the neighborhood has changed and been
highly impacted. She believes the economic benefits drive the student
rentals and that code enforcement of the single-family homes needs to
be increased.
Susan Weihe, 11849 SE 323rd PL, Auburn.
Ms. Weihe stated she has lived in her home for over 36 years. Her
property abuts a GRCC greenbelt and is next to a rental that seems
like a dorm. The greenbelt is now opened for students to go to and
from the college causing a steady stream of traffic. She made a call to
GRCC security regarding the issues, they did not make a site visit. On
Ms. Weihe's behalf Mr. Campbell called security and brought them on
site to address the problem. In addition to daylight activity there is a
steady stream in the evening 7 days per week, with all ages
(individuals she does not believe are students). Ms. Weihe
stated “education is the great equalizer” but the quality of life to the
neighborhood is being impacted and the property values are lower.
Ms. Weihe emphasized if GRCC is bringing students to the
neighborhood the college should have a plan in place to be
responsible for the students without an impact to the community.
C. Director's Report (Tate)
Interim Planning and Development Director Jeff Tate provided
handouts with annual mid-point statistics (June 30 for the years 2000 -
Page 4 of 5
CA.A Page 7 of 37
2013) on single-family residential and commercial permits issued and
the construction valuation of those permits. The City will be conducting
an inventory of land to be developed within the City to determine future
development. Committee and staff discussed the City’s development
activity.
D. PCDC Status Matrix (Tate)
There were no changes or additions to the matrix.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning and
Community development Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 6:35
p.m.
DATED THIS ___________ day of ______________________, 2013.
_____________________________________
Nancy Backus - Chair
_____________________________________
Tina Kriss - Planning Secretary
Page 5 of 5
CA.A Page 8 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
City of Auburn Bicycle Route and Trail Map
Date:
July 1, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Attachment A – Draft Bicycle Route and
Trail Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Chamberlain/Yao
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 9 of 37
Page 1
Memorandum
To: Deputy Mayor Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development
Committee
Councilmember, John Holman Vice-Chair, Planning and Community Development
Committee
Councilmember, Largo Wales, Member, Planning and Community Development
Committee
From: Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager, Planning and Development
Department
Cc: Pete Lewis, Mayor
Date: July 16, 2013
Re: Draft Bicycle Route and Trail Map – Bicycle Task Force Recommendation
Background Summary and Discussion
In 2010, the City established a Bicycle Task Force comprised of a broad cross section of
community members and interested parties that would guide and provide input to the City on
bicycle facilities, routes and connections, and other key issues affecting bicycling options within
our community. The Bicycle Task Force met for about year providing input on the City’s
Comprehensive Transportation Plan with amendments made as part of the 2011 annual
comprehensive plan updates with the addition of a new figure Titled “Bicycle Corridors and
Connectors” and a new table titled “Priority Bicycle Facilities Inventory”. With these additions to
the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the City is able to seek grants for potential
projects.
Another outcome of the Bicycle Task Force is a user friendly, published Bicycle Route and Trail
Map for the public. A draft Bicycle Route and Trail Map has been prepared showing key routes,
connections to City Parks and other facilities, where steep climbs are, and adjacent city
connections. The draft map has been shared with the Bicycle Task Force for their review and
input. Bicycle Task Force Chair, Terry Davis, is unable to attend the July 22, 2013 PCDC
meeting but provided the following statement for the Committee:
“The draft Bike Map is great. I feel it now fully represents the BTF’s ideas and proposed
routes through the City. As the Chair of the BTF, I recommend this product be
presented to the citizens of Auburn through some organized public outreach campaign.”
As for next steps, staff proposes presenting the draft Bicycle Route and Trail Map also to the
Public Works Committee and Transportation, Transit, and Trails Committee. Once the feedback
DI.F Page 10 of 37
Page 2
from the Committees has been incorporated, then staff would move forward with presenting the
finalized map to the public.
Discussion Questions:
1. What feedback does the Committee have on the Bicycle Route and Trail Map?
2. Initial thoughts on public outreach are providing the map on the City’s website, press
release, sharing the map with neighborhood groups/HOAs, sharing the map with the
City’s partners such as GRCC, the school district, Chamber, Auburn Downtown
Association, Auburn YMCA, and others. Are there other public outreach efforts the
Committee would like to see?
Attachments:
Attachment A – Draft Bicycle Route and Trail Map
Attachment B – Bike Tip Sheet – staff will bring to the meeting
DI.F Page 11 of 37
NOT
RECOMMENDED
UP-HILL ROUTE
18
18
WEST VALLEY HWY SW
MI
L
I
T
A
R
Y
R
D
S
9 T H ST E
S 277TH ST
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
12TH ST E
13
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
JOVITA BLVD E
SE 274TH ST
18
2
N
D
A
V
E
E
AUBURN-BL A C K D IA M O N D R D S E
SE 272ND ST
ELLINGSON RD SW
S 288TH ST
S 272ND ST
E
A
S
T
VA
LLE
Y
H
W
Y
S
E
2
1
0
T
H
A
V
E
E
FOREST CA N YON RD E
SE KENT-KA
N
G
L
E
Y
R
D
21
4
T
H
A
V
E
E
68
T
H
A
V
E
S
24TH ST E
321ST ST S
16TH ST E
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
10
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
P
E
A
S
L
E
Y
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S
S 2
7
2
N
D
W
AY
WE
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
N
W
8TH ST E
CE
N
T
R
A
L
A
V
E
S
A
U
B
U
R
N
-
E
N
U
M
C
L
A
W
R
D
S
14
2
N
D
A
V
E
E
STEWART RD SE
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
N
A
S
T
S
E
M
IL
IT
A
R
Y
R
D
S
S 2 77T H S T
24TH ST E
167
167
TRANSIT
STATION
A
S
T
S
E
C
S
T
S
W
B
S
T
N
W
I
S
T
N
E
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
M
S
T
S
E
AU
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
N
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
13
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
R
S
T
S
E
WE
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
N
C
S
T
N
W
W MAIN ST
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
E MAIN ST
4 1 S T S T S E
29TH ST SE
SE 312TH ST
K
E
R
S
EY W
AY SE
8TH ST NE
37TH ST NW
ORAV E TZ RD SE
M ST NE
D
S
T
NW
4TH ST SE
L
A
K
E
L
A
N
D
H
I
L
L
S
W
A
Y
S
E
15TH ST NW
L A KE TAPPS PK
W
Y
S
E
S 316TH ST
S 277TH ST
EMERALD DOWNS DR NW
37TH ST NE
LEA H I L L R D S E
D
S
T
N
E
PEASLEY C ANYON RD S
H
A
R
V
E
Y
R
D
N
E
E
A
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
S
E
15TH ST SW
A ST NE
BOUNDARY BLVD SW
RIVER W A L K D R S E
SE 281ST ST
T
E
R
R
A
CE DR NW
ELLINGSON RD SW
SUMNER-TAPPS HWY E
S E 3 0 4 T H ST
17TH ST SE
A
U
B
URN-BLACK DIAMOND RD SE6TH ST SE
10TH ST NE
15TH ST NE
CROSS
S
T
S
E
16TH ST NW
S 277TH ST
A
S
T
S
E
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
R
S
T
S
E
SENIORCENTER
SE 304TH ST
2ND ST E
C
S
T
N
E
STUCK
R
I
V
E
R
D
R
S
E
53RD ST SE
SE 320TH ST
SE 288TH ST
M
S
T
N
W
37TH ST SE
M
S
T
N
E
SE 284TH ST
4
6
T
H
P
L
S
22ND ST NE
17TH ST SE
S 296TH ST
25TH ST SE
R
S
T
N
E
PE
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
R
D
S
W
D
S
T
S
E
55
T
H
A
V
E
S
ACADEMY DR SE
11
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
10
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
I
S
T
N
W
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
M
S
T
S
E
SE 299TH ST
11
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
GREEN RIVER RD SE
N
S
T
N
E
E
S
T
N
E
O
S
T
N
E
6 9 T H ST SE
W
S
T
N
W
S 287TH ST
SCENIC D
R
S
E
62ND ST SE
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
6TH ST SE
H
S
T
N
W
44TH ST NW
SE 316TH ST
14TH ST NE
S 300T H P L
A ST NE
CL
A
Y
S
T
N
W
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
K
S
T
S
E
S 331ST ST
4TH ST NE
I
S
T
S
E
7TH ST SE
14
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
4TH ST SW
5TH ST SE
E V E R G R E E N WAY S E
MONTEVISTA DR SE
WE
S
T
B
L
V
D
(
B
O
E
I
N
G
)
D
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
S
E
8TH ST SE
T
S
T
S
E
DO
G
W
O
O
D
S
T
S
E
PI
K
E
S
T
N
E
BR
I
D
G
E
T
A
V
E
S
E
H
S
T
S
E
G
S
T
S
E
FRONTAGE RD
B
S
T
S
E
E
S
T
S
E
FO
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
S
E
JO HN REDDINGTON RD NE
1
0
5
T
H
P
L
S
E
14
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
SE 316TH PL
32ND ST NE
G
P
L
S
E
SE 310TH ST
52
N
D
A
V
E
S
47TH ST SE
56TH ST SE
S 305TH ST
67TH ST SE
SE 290TH ST
R I V E R D R SE
57TH PL S 32ND PL NE
J
S
T
S
E
EA
S
T
B
L
V
D
(
B
O
E
I
N
G
)
U
S
T
N
W
127TH PL SE
54
T
H
A
V
E
S
SE 296TH WA
Y
28TH ST NE
D
S
T
N
W
E MAIN ST
13
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
30TH ST NE
R ST NW
51ST ST NE
26TH ST SE
85
T
H
A
V
E
S
C
S
T
S
E
SE 323RD PL
SE 301ST ST
S 300TH ST
MILL POND DR SE
SE 287TH ST
B S
T
N
E
32ND ST SE
36TH S T S E
50TH ST S E
OL
I
V
E
A
V
E
S
E
10TH ST NE S E 3 1 8 T H WAY
29TH ST NW
R I V E R VIE W D R N E
31ST ST SE
H
O
W
A
R
D
R
D
S
E
21ST ST NE
A S T E
V S
T
N
W
S 29
7
T
H
P
L
30TH ST SE
EL
M
S
T
S
E
S 318TH ST
23RD ST SE
SE
3
0
4
T
H
W
A
Y
24TH ST SE
SE 298TH PL
64TH ST SE
HE
M
L
O
C
K
S
T
S
E
22ND ST SE
A
S
T
N
W
H
S
T
N
E
3 5 T H W A Y SE
4TH ST SE
G
S
T
N
E
S 292ND ST
S 288TH ST
O
S
T
S
E
HIGH L A N D D R S E
FORES T R I D G E D R S E
PI
K
E
S
T
N
W
SE 282ND ST
64
T
H
A
V
E
S
16TH ST NE
42ND ST NW
51ST
S
T
S
E
24TH ST NE
SE 295TH ST
111TH PL SE
10TH ST SE
49TH ST N
E
D
S
T
S
W
58
T
H
A
V
E
S
SUPERM A L L D R SW
20TH ST SE
SE 3
2
6
T
H
P
L
5 9 T H S T SE
SE 286TH ST
108TH AVE SE
8TH ST NE
F ST SW
HI CREST D R N W
1
0
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
66TH ST SE
1
0
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
72ND ST SE
M O U N TAIN V I E W D R S W
12
8
T
H
P
L
S
E
16TH ST SE
13TH ST SESUPERMALL WAY SW
24TH ST NW
14
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
42ND ST NE
2ND ST SE
73RD ST SE
37TH W
A
Y
S
E
T S
T
N
W
6TH ST NW
57TH ST SE
B PL NW
SE 285TH ST
SE 294TH ST
9TH ST SE
I
S
A
A
C
A
V
E
S
E
SE 312T
H W
A
Y
52
N
D
P
L
S
L
S
T
N
E
SE 307TH PL
19TH DR NE
28TH ST SE
ELM LN SE
PA
C
I
F
I
C
A
V
E
S
GI
N
K
G
O
S
T
S
E
J ST NE
15TH ST SE
SE 42ND ST
T
S
T
N
E
11TH ST NE
67TH
L
N
S
E
45TH ST
N
E
20TH ST NE
S 303RD PL
SE 299TH PL
LAKE TAPPS DR SE
14TH ST SE
SE 308TH PL
CH
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
A
V
E
S
E
26TH ST NE
63RD ST SE
10
9
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
S 319TH ST
SE 290TH PL
H
A
Z
E
L
A
V
E
S
E
S U P E R M A L L ACRD S W
FI
R
S
T
S
E
S 314T
H
S
T
PA
N
O
R
A
M
A
D
R
S
E
U
S
T
S
E
SE 289TH ST
K
S
T
N
E
SE 297TH ST
19TH ST SE
S 302ND PL
MAPLE DR SE
5 7 T H DR S
E
21ST ST SE
N
O
B
L
E
C
T
S
E
HE
A
T
H
E
R
A
V
E
S
E
12
9
T
H
P
L
S
E
33RD ST SE
61ST A
V
E
S
SE 30 7 T H ST
S 324TH ST
55TH ST SE
RA
N
D
A
L
L
A
V
E
S
E
R PL NE
I PL NE
N
S
T
S
E
WA
R
D
A
V
E
S
E
5
5
T
H
W
A
Y
S
E
107T
H
P
L
S
E
11
7
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE 292ND ST
D PL SE
SE 306TH ST
53RD PL S
11
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
F
S
T
N
E
1
1
2
T
H
P
L
S
E
S
E 323RD ST
WE
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
N
W
11
0
T
H
P
L
S
E
5TH ST NE
12TH ST NE
35TH ST NE
SE 286TH PL
SE 302ND PL
8TH ST SW
SE 300TH ST
10
5
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
40TH ST NE
1ST ST NE
142ND A V E SE
ORAVETZ PL SE
63
R
D
P
L
S
18TH ST SE
62 N D LOOP S
E
SE 314TH ST
59
T
H
A
V
E
S
13
3
R
D
A
V
E
S
E
27TH ST SE
2ND ST NE
ALPINE DR SE
JA
S
M
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
KA
T
H
E
R
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
22ND WAY NE
6TH ST NE
3RD ST NE
S 307TH ST
SE 305TH PL
HE
N
R
Y
R
D
N
E
66
T
H
A
V
E
S
SE 314TH PL
SE 313TH ST
1
0
7
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
130T
H
W
A
Y
S
E
54TH ST SE
SE 302ND ST
PERRY D R SE
E
L
A
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
1
2
1
S
T
P
L
S
E
SE
3
1
8
T
H
P
L
SE 293RD ST
I
S
T
N
E
5
6
T
H
C
T
S
5
8
T
H
P
L
S
49TH ST NW
SE 304TH PL
S 328TH ST
C P
L
S
E
S 329TH PL
28
T
H
P
L
S
E
26TH ST NW
S 321ST ST
1
1
3
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE 315TH ST
SE 311TH ST
O
P
L
N
E
43RD CT NE
12
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
SE 322ND S
T
11TH ST SE
15TH ST NE
DO
U
G
L
A
S
A
V
E
S
E
65TH ST SE
JA
M
E
S
P
L
S
E
16
8
T
H
A
V
E
E
SE 282ND W
A
Y
3RD CT SE
11
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
FR
A
N
K
L
I
N
A
V
E
S
E
S 320TH ST
S 326TH LN
SE 309TH ST
SE 315TH PL
13
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
6
0
T
H
P
L
S
CEDAR DR SE
13TH ST NE
18
1
S
T
A
V
E
E
W
E
S
L
E
Y
P
L
S
E
305TH PL SE23RD ST NE
3RD ST SE
SE 317TH ST
PI
K
E
S
T
S
E
5TH ST SW
HA
Z
E
L
P
L
S
E
11TH
S
T
N
W
SE 309TH PL
37TH ST NW
68TH S
T
S
E
O
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
B
S
T
S
E
R
I
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
D
R
N
E
8TH ST SE
17TH ST SE
65TH ST SE
W
S
T
N
W
D
S
T
S
E
23RD ST SE
K
S
T
S
E
24TH ST SE
54TH AVE S
L ST SE
SE 282ND
S
T
16TH ST SE
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
47TH
S
T
S
E
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
E S
T
S
E
K
S
T
S
E
N
S
T
S
E
G
S
T
S
E
H
S
T
S
E
K
S
T
N
E
SE 315TH ST
T S
T
S
E
DOGWOOD ST S
E
O
S
T
N
E
1 7 T H S T S E
4TH ST NE
5
7
T
H
P
L
S
36TH
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
S
E
11
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
29TH ST NW
U
S
T
S
E
SE 295TH ST
21ST ST SE
2ND ST SE
K
S
T
N
E
24TH ST NE
L
S
T
S
E
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
11TH ST SE
D
S
T
S
E
SE 295TH ST
15TH ST SE
30TH ST NE
52
N
D
A
V
E
S
27TH ST SE
67TH ST SE
H
S
T
N
E
32ND ST SE
11
2
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE
2
9
8
T
H
P
L
28TH ST SE
52ND PL S
37TH ST SE
I S
T
S
E
28TH ST
S
E
SE 307TH ST
104TH AVE SE
SE 282ND ST
SE 286TH PL
R
S
T
N
W
R
S
T
N
W
D
S
T
S
E
J ST NE
PI
K
E
S
T
S
E
J
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
N
E
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
D
S
T
S
E
R
S
T
N
E
50TH S
T
S
E
CASCADEMIDDLE SCHOOL
VALLEYCHRISTIANSCHOOL
WEST AUBURNHIGHSCHOOL
PIONEERELEMENTARYSCHOOL
GILDO REYELEMENTARYSCHOOL
HOLY FAMILYELEMENTARYSCHOOL
DICK SCOBEEELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MESSIAHLUTHERANCHURCHSCHOOL
MEREDITH HILLELEMENTARYSCHOOL
LAKELANDHILLSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
EVERGREENHEIGHTSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
BUENAVISTASCHOOL
AUBURNHIGH SCHOOL
OLYMPICMIDDLESCHOOL
RAINIERMIDDLESCHOOL
ILALKOELEMENTARYSCHOOL
AUBURNADVENTISTACADEMY
CHINOOKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MOUNTBAKERMIDDLESCHOOL
LEA HILLELEMENTARYSCHOOL
HAZELWOODELEMENTARYSCHOOL
ST JAMESOF THOMASSCHOOL
WASHINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL
GREEN RIVERCOMMUNITYCOLLEGE
NORTHWESTFAMILYCHURCHSCHOOL
AUBURNMOUNTAINVIEWHIGH SCHOOL
ARTHURJACOBSENELEMENTARYSCHOOL
AUBURNRIVERSIDEHIGHSCHOOL
AUBURNRIVERSIDEHIGHSCHOOL
TERMINALPARKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
TERMINALPARKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MARYOLSONFARM
AUBURNGAMEFARM
AUBURNENVIRONMENTAL
PARK
BRANNANPARK
GAMEFARMWILDERNESSPARK
SUNSETPARK
LEAHILLPARK
ROEGNER
PARK
ISAACEVANSPARK
GSAPARK
FENSTER
PROPERTY
MILLPOND
PARK
LESGOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS
LESGOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS
CEDAR
LANES
PARK
AUBURNDALEPARK
FULMERPARK
ROTARY
PARK
VETERANSMEMORIALPARK
CAMERONPARK
DORTHYBOTHELLPARK
LAKELANDHILLSPARK
JORNADAPARK
GAINESPARK
LEAHILLTENNIS
COURTS
BICENTENNIAL
PARK
BALLARDPARK
CENTENNIAL
VIEWPOINTPARK
SLAUGHTERMEMORIAL
PARK
YMCA
SPORT
FIELDS
KENT
KING
COUNTY
PIERCE
COUNTY
PACIFIC
SUMNEREDGEWOOD
ALGONA
LAKE
TAPPS
IN
T
E
R
U
R
B
A
N
B
I
K
E
T
R
A
I
L
IN
T
E
R
U
R
B
A
N
B
I
K
E
T
R
A
I
L
To
Flaming
Geyser
To
Kent
To
Kent
&
Seattle
To
Tacoma
To
Federal
Way
To
Federal
Way
To
Edgewood
To
Milton
To
Enumclaw
To
Black
Diamond
To
Pacific
Raceways
To
Sumner
&
Puyallup
To
Sumner
&
Bonney
Lake
To
Bonney
Lake
Map ID: 3760
01,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
FEET
ú
Auburn Muncipal Airport
Emerald Downs
Entertainment Center
Park and Ride Library
City Hall
Justice Center
Shopping Center
City Parks
Schools/Colleges
Golf Course
Activity Center/Gym
Bike Corridors
Primary Routes
Interurban Trail Intersections
Bike Connectors
Multi-Use Trails
Steep Climb
No warranty or guarantee is made as to the suitability of the
roadway condition or the tness of the facility for bicycling. The City
of Auburn disclaims responsibility and shall not be held
accountable, in any manner, for loss, damage, or injury that may be
suered by bicyclists. Riders assume the risk for their own safety
when traveling on the facilities indicated on this map.
Bike Auburn Route & Trail Map
NOT
RECOMMENDED
UP-HILL ROUTE
18
18
WEST VALLEY HWY SW
MI
L
I
T
A
R
Y
R
D
S
9 T H ST E
S 277TH ST
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
12TH ST E
13
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
JOVITA BLVD E
SE 274TH ST
18
2
N
D
A
V
E
E
AUBURN-BL A C K DIA M O N D R D S E
SE 272ND ST
ELLINGSON RD SW
S 288TH ST
S 272ND ST
E
A
S
T
V
A
LLE
Y
H
W
Y
S
E
2
1
0
T
H
A
V
E
E
FOREST C A N YON RD E
SE KENT-KA
N
G
L
E
Y
R
D
21
4
T
H
A
V
E
E
68
T
H
A
V
E
S
24TH ST E
321ST ST S
16TH ST E
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
10
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
P
E
A
S
L
E
Y
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S
S 2
7
2
N
D
W
AY
WE
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
N
W
8TH ST E
CE
N
T
R
A
L
A
V
E
S
A
U
B
U
R
N
-
E
N
U
M
C
L
A
W
R
D
S
14
2
N
D
A
V
E
E
STEWART RD SE
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
N
A S
T
S
E
M
IL
I
T
A
R
Y
R
D
S
S 2 77 T H S T
24TH ST E
167
167
TRANSIT
STATION
A
S
T
S
E
C
S
T
S
W
B
S
T
N
W
I
S
T
N
E
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
S
M
S
T
S
E
AU
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
N
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
13
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
R
S
T
S
E
WE
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
N
C
S
T
N
W
W MAIN ST
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
E MAIN ST
4 1 S T S T S E
29TH ST SE
SE 312TH ST
K
E
R
S
EY W
AY SE
8TH ST NE
37TH ST NW
ORAV E TZ RD SE
M ST NE
D
S
T
NW
4TH ST SE
L
A
K
E
L
A
N
D
H
I
L
L
S
W
A
Y
S
E
15TH ST NW
L A KE TAPPS PK
W
Y
S
E
S 316TH ST
S 277TH ST
EMERALD DOWNS DR NW
37TH ST NE
LEA H I L L R D S E
D
S
T
N
E
PEASLEY C ANYON RD S
H
A
R
V
E
Y
R
D
N
E
EA
S
T
V
A
L
L
E
Y
H
W
Y
S
E
15TH ST SW
A ST NE
BOUNDARY BLVD SW
RIVER W A L K D R S E
SE 281ST ST
T
E
R
R
A
CE DR NW
ELLINGSON RD SW
SUMNER-TAPPS HWY E
S E 3 0 4 T H ST
17TH ST SE
A
U
B
URN-BLACK DIAMOND RD SE6TH ST SE
10TH ST NE
15TH ST NE
CROSS
S
T
S
E
16TH ST NW
S 277TH ST
A
S
T
S
E
12
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
R
S
T
S
E
SENIORCENTER
SE 304TH ST
2ND ST E
C
S
T
N
E
STUCK
R
I
V
E
R
D
R
S
E
53RD ST SE
SE 320TH ST
SE 288TH ST
M
S
T
N
W
37TH ST SE
M
S
T
N
E
SE 284TH ST
4
6
T
H
P
L
S
22ND ST NE
17TH ST SE
S 296TH ST
25TH ST SE
R
S
T
N
E
PE
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
R
D
S
W
D
S
T
S
E
55
T
H
A
V
E
S
ACADEMY DR SE
11
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
10
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
I
S
T
N
W
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
51
S
T
A
V
E
S
M
S
T
S
E
SE 299TH ST
11
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
GREEN RIVER RD SE
N
S
T
N
E
E
S
T
N
E
O
S
T
N
E
6 9 T H ST SE
W
S
T
N
W
S 287TH ST
SCENIC D
R
S
E
62ND ST SE
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
6TH ST SE
H
S
T
N
W
44TH ST NW
SE 316TH ST
14TH ST NE
S 300T H P L
A ST NE
CL
A
Y
S
T
N
W
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
K
S
T
S
E
S 331ST ST
4TH ST NE
I
S
T
S
E
7TH ST SE
14
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
4TH ST SW
5TH ST SE
E V E R G R E E N WAY S E
MONTEVISTA DR SE
WE
S
T
B
L
V
D
(
B
O
E
I
N
G
)
D
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
S
E
8TH ST SE
T
S
T
S
E
DO
G
W
O
O
D
S
T
S
E
PI
K
E
S
T
N
E
BR
I
D
G
E
T
A
V
E
S
E
H
S
T
S
E
G
S
T
S
E
FRONTAGE RD
B
S
T
S
E
E
S
T
S
E
FO
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
S
E
JO HN REDDINGTON RD NE
1
0
5
T
H
PL
S
E
14
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
SE 316TH PL
32ND ST NE
G
P
L
S
E
SE 310TH ST
52
N
D
A
V
E
S
47TH ST SE
56TH ST SE
S 305TH ST
67TH ST SE
SE 290TH ST
R I V E R DR SE
57TH PL S 32ND PL NE
J
S
T
S
E
EA
S
T
B
L
V
D
(
B
O
E
I
N
G
)
U
S
T
N
W
127TH PL SE
54
T
H
A
V
E
S
SE 296TH WA
Y
28TH ST NE
D
S
T
N
W
E MAIN ST
13
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
30TH ST NE
R ST NW
51ST ST NE
26TH ST SE
85
T
H
A
V
E
S
C
S
T
S
E
SE 323RD PL
SE 301ST ST
S 300TH ST
MILL POND DR SE
SE 287TH ST
B S
T
N
E
32ND ST SE
36TH S T S E
50TH ST S E
OL
I
V
E
A
V
E
S
E
10TH ST NE S E 3 1 8 T H WAY
29TH ST NW
R I V E R VIE W D R N E
31ST ST SE
H
O
W
A
R
D
R
D
S
E
21ST ST NE
A S T E
V S
T
N
W
S 29
7
T
H
P
L
30TH ST SE
EL
M
S
T
S
E
S 318TH ST
23RD ST SE
SE
3
0
4
T
H
W
A
Y
24TH ST SE
SE 298TH PL
64TH ST SE
HE
M
L
O
C
K
S
T
S
E
22ND ST SE
A
S
T
N
W
H
S
T
N
E
3 5 T H W A Y S E
4TH ST SE
G
S
T
N
E
S 292ND ST
S 288TH ST
O
S
T
S
E
HIGHL A N D D R S E
FOREST R I D G E D R S E
PI
K
E
S
T
N
W
SE 282ND ST
64
T
H
A
V
E
S
16TH ST NE
42ND ST NW
51ST
S
T
S
E
24TH ST NE
SE 295TH ST
111TH PL SE
10TH ST SE
49TH ST NE
D
S
T
S
W
58
T
H
A
V
E
S
SUPERM A L L D R SW
20TH ST SE
SE 3
2
6
T
H
P
L
5 9 T H S T SE
SE 286TH ST
108TH AVE SE
8TH ST NE
F ST SW
HI CREST D R N W
1
0
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
E
66TH ST SE
1
0
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
72ND ST SE
M O U N TAIN V I E W D R S W
12
8
T
H
P
L
S
E
16TH ST SE
13TH ST SESUPERMALL WAY SW
24TH ST NW
14
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
42ND ST NE
2ND ST SE
73RD ST SE
37TH W
A
Y
S
E
T S
T
N
W
6TH ST NW
57TH ST SE
B PL NW
SE 285TH ST
SE 294TH ST
9TH ST SE
I
S
A
A
C
A
V
E
S
E
SE 312T
H W
A
Y
52
N
D
P
L
S
L
S
T
N
E
SE 307TH PL
19TH DR NE
28TH ST SE
ELM LN SE
PA
C
I
F
I
C
A
V
E
S
GI
N
K
G
O
S
T
S
E
J ST NE
15TH ST SE
SE 42ND ST
T
S
T
N
E
11TH ST NE
67TH
L
N
S
E
45TH ST
N
E
20TH ST NE
S 303RD PL
SE 299TH PL
LAKE TAPPS DR SE
14TH ST SE
SE 308TH PL
CH
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
A
V
E
S
E
26TH ST NE
63RD ST SE
10
9
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
S 319TH ST
SE 290TH PL
H
A
Z
E
L
A
V
E
S
E
S U P E R M A L L ACRD S W
FI
R
S
T
S
E
S 314T
H
S
T
PA
N
O
R
A
M
A
D
R
S
E
U
S
T
S
E
SE 289TH ST
K
S
T
N
E
SE 297TH ST
19TH ST SE
S 302ND PL
MAPLE DR SE
5 7 T H DR S
E
21ST ST SE
N
O
B
L
E
C
T
S
E
HE
A
T
H
E
R
A
V
E
S
E
12
9
T
H
P
L
S
E
33RD ST SE
61ST A
V
E S
SE 307 T H ST
S 324TH ST
55TH ST SE
RA
N
D
A
L
L
A
V
E
S
E
R PL NE
I PL NE
N
S
T
S
E
WA
R
D
A
V
E
S
E
5
5
T
H
W
A
Y
S
E
107T
H
P
L
S
E
11
7
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE 292ND ST
D PL SE
SE 306TH ST
53RD PL S
11
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
F
S
T
N
E
1
1
2
T
H
P
L
S
E
S
E 323RD ST
WE
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
N
W
11
0
T
H
P
L
S
E
5TH ST NE
12TH ST NE
35TH ST NE
SE 286TH PL
SE 302ND PL
8TH ST SW
SE 300TH ST
10
5
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
40TH ST NE
1ST ST NE
142ND A V E SE
ORAVETZ PL SE
63
R
D
P
L
S
18TH ST SE
62 N D LOOP S
E
SE 314TH ST
59
T
H
A
V
E
S
13
3
R
D
A
V
E
S
E
27TH ST SE
2ND ST NE
ALPINE DR SE
JA
S
M
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
KA
T
H
E
R
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
22ND WAY NE
6TH ST NE
3RD ST NE
S 307TH ST
SE 305TH PL
HE
N
R
Y
R
D
N
E
66
T
H
A
V
E
S
SE 314TH PL
SE 313TH ST
1
0
7
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
130T
H
W
A
Y
S
E
54TH ST SE
SE 302ND ST
PERRY D R SE
E
L
A
I
N
E
A
V
E
S
E
1
2
1
S
T
P
L
S
E
SE
3
1
8
T
H
P
L
SE 293RD ST
I
S
T
N
E
5
6
T
H
C
T
S
5
8
T
H
P
L
S
49TH ST NW
SE 304TH PL
S 328TH ST
C P
L
S
E
S 329TH PL
28
T
H
P
L
S
E
26TH ST NW
S 321ST ST
1
1
3
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE 315TH ST
SE 311TH ST
O
P
L
N
E
43RD CT NE
12
0
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
SE 322ND S
T
11TH ST SE
15TH ST NE
DO
U
G
L
A
S
A
V
E
S
E
65TH ST SE
JA
M
E
S
P
L
S
E
16
8
T
H
A
V
E
E
SE 282ND W
A
Y
3RD CT SE
11
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
FR
A
N
K
L
I
N
A
V
E
S
E
S 320TH ST
S 326TH LN
SE 309TH ST
SE 315TH PL
13
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
6
0
T
H
P
L
S
CEDAR DR SE
13TH ST NE
18
1
S
T
A
V
E
E
W
E
S
L
E
Y
P
L
S
E
305TH PL SE23RD ST NE
3RD ST SE
SE 317TH ST
PI
K
E
S
T
S
E
5TH ST SW
HA
Z
E
L
P
L
S
E
11TH
S
T
N
W
SE 309TH PL
37TH ST NW
68TH S
T
S
E
O
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
B
S
T
S
E
R
I
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
D
R
N
E
8TH ST SE
17TH ST SE
65TH ST SE
W
S
T
N
W
D
S
T
S
E
23RD ST SE
K
S
T
S
E
24TH ST SE
54TH AVE S
L ST SE
SE 282ND
S
T
16TH ST SE
11
6
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
47TH
S
T
S
E
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
E S
T
S
E
K
S
T
S
E
N
S
T
S
E
G
S
T
S
E
H
S
T
S
E
K
S
T
N
E
SE 315TH ST
T S
T
S
E
DOGWOOD ST S
E
O
S
T
N
E
1 7 T H S T S E
4TH ST NE
5
7
T
H
P
L
S
36TH
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
S
E
11
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
29TH ST NW
U
S
T
S
E
SE 295TH ST
21ST ST SE
2ND ST SE
K
S
T
N
E
24TH ST NE
L
S
T
S
E
56
T
H
A
V
E
S
11TH ST SE
D
S
T
S
E
SE 295TH ST
15TH ST SE
30TH ST NE
52
N
D
A
V
E
S
27TH ST SE
67TH ST SE
H
S
T
N
E
32ND ST SE
11
2
T
H
P
L
S
E
SE
2
9
8
T
H
P
L
28TH ST SE
52ND PL S
37TH ST SE
I S
T
S
E
28TH ST
S
E
SE 307TH ST
104TH AVE SE
SE 282ND ST
SE 286TH PL
R
S
T
N
W
R
S
T
N
W
D
S
T
S
E
J ST NE
PI
K
E
S
T
S
E
J
S
T
N
E
F
S
T
S
E
L
S
T
N
E
11
2
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
D
S
T
S
E
R
S
T
N
E
50TH S
T
S
E
CASCADEMIDDLE SCHOOL
VALLEYCHRISTIANSCHOOL
WEST AUBURNHIGHSCHOOL
PIONEERELEMENTARYSCHOOL
GILDO REYELEMENTARYSCHOOL
HOLY FAMILYELEMENTARYSCHOOL
DICK SCOBEEELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MESSIAHLUTHERANCHURCHSCHOOL
MEREDITH HILLELEMENTARYSCHOOL
LAKELANDHILLSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
EVERGREENHEIGHTSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
BUENAVISTASCHOOL
AUBURNHIGH SCHOOL
OLYMPICMIDDLESCHOOL
RAINIERMIDDLESCHOOL
ILALKOELEMENTARYSCHOOL
AUBURNADVENTISTACADEMY
CHINOOKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MOUNTBAKERMIDDLESCHOOL
LEA HILLELEMENTARYSCHOOL
HAZELWOODELEMENTARYSCHOOL
ST JAMESOF THOMASSCHOOL
WASHINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL
GREEN RIVERCOMMUNITYCOLLEGE
NORTHWESTFAMILYCHURCHSCHOOL
AUBURNMOUNTAINVIEWHIGH SCHOOL
ARTHURJACOBSENELEMENTARYSCHOOL
AUBURNRIVERSIDEHIGHSCHOOL
AUBURNRIVERSIDEHIGHSCHOOL
TERMINALPARKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
TERMINALPARKELEMENTARYSCHOOL
MARYOLSONFARM
AUBURNGAMEFARM
AUBURNENVIRONMENTAL
PARK
BRANNANPARK
GAMEFARMWILDERNESSPARK
SUNSETPARK
LEAHILLPARK
ROEGNERPARK
ISAAC
EVANSPARK
GSA
PARK
FENSTERPROPERTY
MILL
PONDPARK
LESGOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS
LESGOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS
CEDAR
LANESPARK
AUBURNDALEPARK
FULMER
PARK
ROTARYPARK
VETERANSMEMORIALPARK
CAMERONPARK
DORTHYBOTHELLPARK
LAKELANDHILLS
PARK
JORNADA
PARK
GAINESPARK
LEAHILLTENNISCOURTS
BICENTENNIALPARK
BALLARDPARK
CENTENNIAL
VIEWPOINTPARK
SLAUGHTERMEMORIALPARK
YMCA
SPORT
FIELDS
KENT
KING
COUNTY
PIERCE
COUNTY
PACIFIC
SUMNEREDGEWOOD
ALGONA
LAKE
TAPPS
IN
T
E
R
U
R
B
A
N
B
I
K
E
T
R
A
I
L
IN
T
E
R
U
R
B
A
N
B
I
K
E
T
R
A
I
L
To
Flaming
Geyser
To
Kent
To
Kent
&
Seattle
To
Tacoma
To
Federal
Way
To
Federal
Way
To
Edgewood
To
Milton
To
Enumclaw
To
Black
Diamond
To
Pacific
Raceways
To
Sumner
&
Puyallup
To
Sumner
&
Bonney
Lake
To
Bonney
Lake
Map ID: 3760
01,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
FEET
ú
Auburn Muncipal Airport
Emerald Downs
Entertainment Center
Park and Ride Library
City Hall
Justice Center
Shopping Center
City Parks
Schools/Colleges
Golf Course
Activity Center/Gym
Bike Corridors
Primary Routes
Interurban Trail Intersections
Bike Connectors
Multi-Use Trails
Steep Climb
No warranty or guarantee is made as to the suitability of the
roadway condition or the tness of the facility for bicycling. The City
of Auburn disclaims responsibility and shall not be held
accountable, in any manner, for loss, damage, or injury that may be
suered by bicyclists. Riders assume the risk for their own safety
when traveling on the facilities indicated on this map.
Bike Corridors
North/South road connections
through Auburn
Bike Connectors
East/West road connections
through Auburn
Multi-Use Trails
Non-motorized paved trail
connections through Auburn
Primary Routes
Main routes through Auburn
DI.F Page 12 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
City of Auburn Floodplain Management
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Andersen
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.G
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.G Page 13 of 37
Memorandum
DATE: July 18, 2013
TO: Auburn City Council Planning and Community Development Committee:
Deputy Mayor Nancy Backus, Chair
Councilmember John Holman, Vice Chair
Councilmember Largo Wales
FROM: Chris Andersen, CFM, Environmental Services Manager
CC: Peter B. Lewis, Mayor
Jeff Tate, Interim Director, Planning and Development Department
Dennis Dowdy, P.E., Public Works Director
Sarah Miller, Emergency Preparedness Manager
SUBJECT: Floodplain Management Briefing #4: Flood Control and Flood Event
Preparation and Response
Introduction
This discussion of flood control and flood event preparation and response in Auburn is the fourth
briefing to the Planning and Community Development Committee (PCDC) in a series of
scheduled briefings regarding City of Auburn floodplain management activities. At the PCDC
meeting on April 22, 2013, staff provided an initial overview of recent local and national issues
that have influenced or affected the City’s floodplain management activities over the last several
years, and some anticipated developments that are expected to affect City floodplain
management activities in the future. In a second briefing on May 13, 2013, staff briefed the
Committee about the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), including the existing level of
costs and coverage for flood insurance policies held by property owners within Auburn, and the
City’s participation in the Community Rating System (CRS) program. A third briefing held on
June 24, 2013, provided information to the Committee regarding FEMA Flood Insurance Rate
Maps, City of Auburn Regulatory Floodplain mapping, the national flood risk mapping update
project, and the various types of FEMA map amendments.
DI.G Page 14 of 37
2
The following table summarizes the information presented at each of the previous briefings. The
‘Items Discussed’ column in the table will be updated after each briefing to summarize the
information presented to date. Blanks indicate that information for that topic will be provided in
a scheduled future briefing.
Planning and Community Development Committee Floodplain Management Briefing Series
Meeting Date Briefing Topic Items Discussed
Briefing #1
Held on
April 22, 2013
Recent and anticipated
future developments
affecting floodplain
management in Auburn,
and general overview of
future briefings.
· 2007 - Issuance of new preliminary flood hazard maps by
FEMA, City of Auburn appealed and submitted own study.
· 2008 - Issuance of a biological opinion document (Bi-Op)
by the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS)
regarding.
· 2009 - City enacted floodplain development moratorium
pending implementation of Bi-Op requirements.
· 2009 - Damage to Howard Hanson Dam from winter storm
flows and City deployment of temporary flood measures.
· 2010 - City adoption of FEMA model ordinance for
floodplain development, City’s 2009 floodplain
moratorium repealed.
· 2011 - FEMA’s mapping update effort placed on hold
nationally, pending adoption of policy on treatment of
unaccredited levees.
· 2012 - Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act signed
into law, requires NFIP to be financially self-supporting.
· 2013 Community Rating System (CRS) major program
revision at national level.
· Future - FEMA mapping updates to resume in Auburn
upon FEMA adoption of national mapping policy for
unaccredited levees.
Briefing #2
Held on
May 13, 2013
Flood Insurance in Auburn,
the NFIP and CRS
programs
· NFIP created in 1968 to mitigate future flood losses
through community-enforced building, and land use
management ordinances.
· Auburn joined NFIP in 1974. Three basic elements of the
NFIP are: Mapping, Insurance, and Regulations.
· Mapping: First Flood Hazard Boundary Maps for City
issued by FEMA in 1974; First Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRMs) based on a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) issued in
1981.
· Insurance: Flood insurance premiums based on degree of
flood protection provided; covers all “floods”, not just
declared disasters, policies take effect 30 days after
issuance.
· Regulations: NFIP administered nationally by FEMA, by
the Department of Ecology for Washington State, and the
Auburn Floodplain Administrator (Planning Director or
designee) at the City level. Minimum City requirements
established by federal regulations (44 CFR Part 60).
DI.G Page 15 of 37
3
· Currently, there are just over 900 flood insurance policies
in effect in the City; most of these (95%) insure property
that is not located in mapped flood hazard areas.
· Biggert Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act passed in
2012 now requires the NFIP to be financially self-
supporting; as a result premiums for many policy holders
are expected to increase over the next several years.
· Community Rating System (CRS) is a point-based
incentive program that rewards communities that exceed
minimum requirements with lower flood insurance
premiums.
· Auburn is currently rated as a Class 5 CRS community,
which provides a 25% discount on flood insurance
premiums in mapped flood hazard areas.
· CRS program was substantially revised in early 2013,
changing the scoring system, creditable activities, and
documentation requirements for receiving CRS credit.
· The next City of Auburn CRS evaluation is in 2014.
Briefing #3
Held on
June 24, 2013
Flood risk mapping
· FEMA issues Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for
Auburn based on a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) that
evaluates hydrology and hydraulic data for the Green and
White River Basins.
· The FIRMs show the boundaries of the Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA) for each river basin, as well as the
based flood (100-year) elevations (BFEs) and the
regulatory floodway.
· Auburn uses the FIRMs to produce the City of Auburn
regulatory floodplain map, which also shows Riparian
Habitat Zones (RHZs) and river Channel Migration Zones
(CMZs), which are required elements of the National
Marine Fisheries Service’s (NMFS) biological opinion
issued for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
· Nationally, FEMA is updating the FIRMs by conducting
new FIS’s for each community and preparing new Digital
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs). That process has
been on hold since 2011 pending FEMA’s development of
a new national policy for modeling the flood protection
benefits of unaccredited levees.
NOTE: FEMA issued the new policy on July 12, 2013.
· There are several different processes used by FEMA to
revise FIRMs, depending on the size of the area to be
revised and the reason for the revision. Either the City or
private property owners may initiate a revision.
Briefing #4
Scheduled for
July 22, 2013
Flood control and flood
response
DI.G Page 16 of 37
4
Briefing #5
Scheduled for
September 23,
2013
Flood risk management,
land use, and floodplain
policy
In Auburn, flood control and flood event preparation and response activities are primarily
managed by the City’s Public Works Department. Key Public Works divisions involved in these
activities include the Engineering Division, which addresses both riverine and localized drainage
and flooding issues, and the Emergency Management Division which coordinates the planning,
preparation, and response activities for riverine flood events. At the PCDC briefing on July 22nd,
Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy and his staff will provide an overview of key issues and
City activities in each of these areas.
The staff presentation to the Committee will include the following information:
Flood Control:
· An overview of the City’s levee system, including the following issues:
o Accredited vs. unaccredited levees: The levee & revetment system within the City
is owned and maintained by the King County Flood Control District (KC FCD).
None of the City’s levees prior to construction of the new Reddington Levee
(currently under construction) were designed or constructed to meet FEMA’s
standards for accreditation.
o Army Corps of Engineers’ policies regarding levee vegetation management: The
Corps vegetation rules require removal of all large trees within the levee prism,
which presents a maintenance challenge for KC FCD. Starting this year, a new
two-year long study by KC FCD and the Corps called the System-wide
Improvement Framework (SWIF) will address this topic. The SWIF effort will
help to determine how KC FCD can meet the Corps vegetation standards to
remain eligible for emergency assistance provided under the authority of the
federal Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Act, Public Law 84-99 (PL 84-99).
o Dams, both upstream and within the City: Both the Green and White Rivers are
regulated for flood control and water supply with dams that are located outside
(upstream) of the City and are operated by the Corps. The Green River is
regulated by the Howard Hanson Dam, and the White River is regulated by Mud
Mountain Dam. Within Auburn, there are several smaller earthen structures that
are required to be permitted as dams by the Washington State Department of
Ecology. The City is responsible to assure that dams within the City are inspected
and do not pose a threat downstream.
· The City’s role with the King and Pierce County Flood Districts:
o County Flood Districts: The King County Flood Control District (KC FCD)
provides flood risk management services in King County, and the recently formed
Pierce County Flood Control Zone District (PC FCZD) provides those services in
Pierce County.
DI.G Page 17 of 37
5
o KC FCD Advisory Committee: This Committee is composed of representatives
from the communities served by the KC FCD, and advises the District’s Board of
Supervisors regarding the annual priorities of studies and projects that are eligible
for District funding for capital improvements. The Advisory Committee also
advises the District on the development and adoption of policies for planning
future projects within each river basin, and in the development of a District annual
operations budget that assures that King County has a standing flood response
capability.
o KC FCD Basin Technical Committees (BTCs): The BTCs are composed of
technical staff from King County cities, and meet monthly with District staff to
review ongoing projects and discuss any concerns the cities may have with the
levee system.
o PC FCZD Advisory Committee: Similar to the KC FCD Advisory Committee, the
PC FCZD Advisory Committee advises the PC FCZD Board of Supervisors on
matters involving flood control policy, the development of the County flood
control plan, capital project plans and funding, and adoption of an annual
operating budget.
o The Green River SWIF Project: The System-wide Improvement Framework is a
river corridor-level flood risk management planning, project identification, and
project prioritization effort, led by the Corps. The Green River SWIF is
anticipated to be a two-year study effort involving resource agencies, cities, the
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, selected business organizations, and selected
environmental groups to advise the Corps and KC FCD on various environmental
issues that affect or may require mitigation for future initiatives to maintain or
improve the Green River levee system.
Flood Event Preparation:
· Staff will provide an overview of City flood hazard planning:
o King County Flood Control Plan: Flood hazard planning is accomplished through
a series of studies to determine deficiencies in the levee system that should be
improved in the future by documenting the issues in the Districts’ comprehensive
plan updates. Since 2012, KC FCD has been working to update the existing King
County Flood Control Plan. The plan is scheduled for adoption by the KC FCD
Board of Supervisors by the end of September 2013. The City anticipates that the
ongoing basin planning efforts will lead to new flood control capital projects in
the future. These projects will need to be scoped and planned for future execution
based upon the priority system that the District uses to score benefits and costs,
and the capital investment priorities amongst the various river basins.
o King County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan: The City is an active participant
in the King County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan, which compiles a
comprehensive list of threats and hazards (including floods) and identifies broad
strategies for dealing with them. The City’s participation in the development and
update of this plan makes it eligible for grant funding to use toward the priorities
the City has developed for hazard mitigation within Auburn.
DI.G Page 18 of 37
6
· City of Auburn flood risk reduction priorities:
o Risk reduction project priorities: Remaining known priorities after the Reddington
Levee Setback Phase 1A (currently under construction) are the Reddington Levee
Phase 1B and Phase 2 projects to complete the levee all way to S 277th Street at
the northern limit of the City. As the City goes thru the SWIF planning effort,
new projects may be identified to accomplish the long range goal of providing a
“250-Year” (0.4 percent annual chance) level of flood protection in urban areas
along the Green River.
o Staff Training: Key City employees attend annual training and exercises in
preparation for severe weather activity, including floods, to ensure the City’s
situational awareness, communications, and coordination capabilities are
adequate.
Flood Event Response:
· Staff will provide and overview of the City’s emergency response framework:
o Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan: The City’s emergency response
framework is contained in Auburn’s Comprehensive Emergency Management
Plan (CEMP), and is based upon the Incident Command System (ICS) and
National Incident Management System (NIMS).
o Coordination with the public: Flooding within the City is typically more often due
to internal drainage events than to externally caused events. A recent exception to
this was the 2009 Howard Hanson Dam (HHD) experience which required a
major response effort for the City that involved significant preparation, and
numerous public information meetings to ensure that all residents and property
owners within the area of flood risk understood the nature of the threat, its
unpredictable character, and how to prepare should the City’s advance flood
measures (sandbag wall) not be sufficient to prevent flooding from high flows on
the Green River.
o Volunteers, training, and mutual assistance compacts: The City has trained, and
continues to train, community volunteers to assist City staff in the event that flood
response is needed. The City is a signatory to the King County Regional Disaster
Plan and the Washington Mutual Aid Compact, both of which allow Auburn to
readily utilize resources from other jurisdictions to assist the City in its flood fight
efforts.
· The City of Auburn’s emergency communication system:
o Communication system: Auburn has a robust public communication system that
includes internal and public educational activities, pre-event notifications, and
post-event data collection. For example, in the fall the City uses this system to
encourage the public to keep storm drains in their neighborhoods clear to prevent
urban flooding.
o Communication methods: The City utilizes a variety of communication methods,
including: CodeRed, AM 1700, TV21, portable message signs, e-mail lists, social
DI.G Page 19 of 37
7
media (Twitter and Facebook), the City website, the Regional Public Information
Network, 211, the Emergency Management Public Information Line, the
Emergency Alert System, and, in extreme events, door-to-door notifications. The
City also calls upon its community partners and traditional media to pass critical
information to their clients who may not be aware of our existing communication
methods.
· Auburn’s StormReady Certification:
o Auburn is a StormReady City: The City of Auburn meets a list of requirements set
forth by the National Weather Service for severe weather preparedness,
notification, and response capabilities, and therefore has been certified as a
StormReady City. This certification recognizes that the City has systems and
procedures in place for keeping its residents and businesses prepared for
significant weather events. In addition, the City is awarded Community Rating
System (CRS) points for earning and maintaining this certification.
Briefing # 5: September 23, 2013
The next briefing to the PCDC is a summary briefing for the floodplain management series
scheduled for September 23, 2013. At that briefing, staff will provide information regarding the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) biological opinion (Bi-Op) issued for the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) by NMFS in 2008, the role of land use policy in floodplain
management, and an overview of other floodplain management policy issues and options.
DI.G Page 20 of 37
8
Floodplain Acronyms and Abbreviations
ACC Auburn City Code
Biggert-Waters Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012
Bi-Op Biological Opinion issued by NMFS in 2008 for NFIP
CEMP Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CLOMA Conditional Letter of Map Amendment
CLOMR Conditional Letter of Map Revision
CLOMR-F Conditional Letter of Map Revision due to the placement of new Fill
CMA Channel Migration Area
CRS Community Rating System
Corps US Army Corps of Engineers
ESA Endangered Species Act
FDP Floodplain Development Permit
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHBM Flood Hazard Boundary Map
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
FIS Flood Insurance Study
ICS Incident Command System
ISO Insurance Services Office
KCFCD King County Flood Control District
LOMA Letter of Map Amendment
LOMR Letter of Map Revision
LOMR-F Letter of Map Revision due to the placement of new Fill
NFIP National Flood Insurance Program
NIMS National Incident Management System
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
PCDC Auburn City Council Planning and Community Development Committee
PDD City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
PL 84-99 Public Law 84-99, The Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Act
RHZ Riparian Habitat Zone
SFHA Special Flood Hazard Area
SWIF System-wide Improvement Framework
DI.G Page 21 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Mixed Use Development Standards - C-1, Light Commercial
Zone
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Tate/Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.H
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H Page 22 of 37
Memorandum
TO: Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
John Holman, Vice Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
Largo Wales, Member, Planning and Community Development Committee
CC: Mayor Lewis
FROM: Jeff Tate, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager, Planning and Development
Department
DATE: July 17, 2013
RE: Mixed Use Development Standards in the C-1, Light Commercial, Zoning
Designation
Summary
During the June 10, 2013 PCDC discussion, PCDC provided instruction to Planning staff to
work on amendments to the Title 18 standards that regulate mixed use development in the C-1,
Light Commercial, zone. Specifically, PCDC was supportive of extending the more flexible
mixed use design standards of the C-3, Heavy Commercial, zone to the C-1, Light Commercial,
zone (which allowed for the commercial and residential elements to be separated into different
structures. Additionally, PCDC provided general support for modifying the criteria used to
quantify how much commercial square footage needed to be incorporated into a mixed use
development and the options for sequencing when the commercial portions needed to be
developed.
Staff has evaluated the existing provisions and has assembled a series of code changes that
will be transmitted to the City of Auburn Planning Commission for consideration and holding of a
public hearing. Once the Planning Commission has deliberated, their recommendation will be
transmitted back to PCDC for review and consideration of scheduling the item before full City
Council. The remaining schedule is as follows:
1. August 1, 2013 – Transmittal of draft amendments to State agencies and request of
expedited review
2. August 1, 2013 - Issuance of SEPA threshold determination
3. August 6, 2013 – Notice of Planning Commission public hearing
4. August 20, 2013 – Planning Commission public hearing
5. August 26, 2013 – Planning Commission recommendation presented to PCDC
6. September 2 or 16, 2013 – City Council action (if expedited review is granted)
DI.H Page 23 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Strategic Plan
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
RFQ for Visioning
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Tate/Chamberlain
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.I
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.I Page 24 of 37
Memorandum
TO: Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
John Holman, Vice Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
Largo Wales, Member, Planning and Community Development Committee
CC: Mayor Lewis
FROM: Jeff Tate, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager, Planning and Development
Department
DATE: July 17, 2013
RE: Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan Update
Summary
During the April 22, 2013 PCD discussion the Committee provided support for the schedule staff
presented for the update to the Comprehensive Plan and the development of a Strategic Plan.
Staff then shared the schedule and strategy with the Planning Commission at their May 7, 2013
regularly scheduled meeting. Pursuant to the schedule, from May thru August staff was to
perform the following tasks:
· Collect examples of Comprehensive Plans and Strategic Plans in order to identify
preferred formats and ideas that can be borrowed in developing the next generation of
these documents for the City of Auburn.
At the February 28, 2013 City Council Committee of the Whole (COW) discussion, the
COW provided general support for utilizing the format adopted by the City of Vancouver,
Washington for the Strategic Plan. The COW gravitated towards Vancouver’s Strategic
because it has visual appeal, it is readable, simple to navigate, and included measurable
metrics for evaluating implementation. Staff also believes that this format has much to
offer and has begun to draft an electronic template that can be customized to Auburn.
Thus far, staff has not offered specific examples of preferred formats for the
Comprehensive Plan. PCD has generally concurred that a smaller, more visual
Comprehensive Plan is better than a voluminous, text heavy document. Staff has been
researching other jurisdictions that have created this type of Comprehensive Plan and
believes that the following jurisdictions provide elements that can be borrowed to create
a more useable and meaningful Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Examples of Plans that
staff is reviewing are:
o City of Bellevue, Washington
DI.I Page 25 of 37
o City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
o City of Sedona, Arizona
o City of Vancouver, Washington
o City of San Diego, California
o City of New Orleans, Louisiana
Staff will bring some of these documents to the meeting as a visual aid in facilitating a
discussion about document format.
· Begin developing outreach and visioning ideas.
Staff believes that the visioning process would be far more effective if a consultant were
retained for the purposes of helping us through a constructive community dialogue that
reaches as many people as possible. Attached is a draft Request for Qualifications
(RFQ) that we recommend be published and distributed that allows the City to start
talking to consultants about their qualifications, experience, and ideas for assisting the
City in this endeavor. The RFQ establishes the initial priorities for the visioning exercise
– an inclusive, cohesive, accessible, and city driven process. At this point, staff believes
that the role of the consultant would be to provide guidance and structure for the process
and to define the questions that should be asked, the methods for encouraging good
dialogue, and a formula for digesting and interpreting the feedback and data that is
collected. Staff would facilitate public discussions and serve as the face of the process.
Questions:
1. Does PCD like the idea of a more visual and consolidated Comprehensive Plan?
2. Does PCD have other ideas or examples of other jurisdictions that staff should
research?
3. Is PCD comfortable with discussing visioning ideas with consultants?
4. If yes, is PCD comfortable with the consultant providing background consultation while
City staff serve as the face of the dialogue?
5. Does PCD have feedback on the draft RFQ?
6. Should any of these issues be discussed with the entire Council?
DI.I Page 26 of 37
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
(RFQ)
CITY OF AUBURN VISIONING
CITY OF AUBURN
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
CITY OF AUBURN VISIONING
The City of Auburn (“City”) is requesting Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) from firms
experienced in assisting a community through a comprehensive community-wide
visioning exercise.
Pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act, the City of Auburn is
required to complete its Comprehensive Plan update by June 30, 2015. As a precursor
to the update, the City would like to engage the community in a variety of visioning
exercises that acheive the following:
· Inclusive: Auburn is rich in diversity and the visioning process needs to be
designed in a manner that reaches as many segments of the population as
possible (e.g. culture, age, socio-economic, spatial).
· Cohesive: The geography of Auburn and its history of annexation has resulted in
neighborhoods that are geographically separated; while the visioning exercise
should recognize the identity of individual neighborhoods it must emphasize that
we are a single community.
· Accessible: The visioning exercise should not rely upon traditional formats of
government interaction with the community and should instead favor an
approach that emphasizes innovative ways to communicate and that brings the
visioning process to the people.
· City Driven: The City of Auburn believes that it is important for the process to be
a direct dialogue between staff/electeds and the community therefore the
structure of this effort should assume that staff/electeds will take the lead in
interacting with the community and that the consultant will act as an advisor in
setting up the structure of the program, meeting formats, outreach initiatives,
data analyzer, etc.
The SOQ will present the review team with qualifications and must identify:
· Areas of expertise and experience that the firm has in developing and
implementing a community visioning process that achieves the above priorities;
· An overview of the methods of communication and meeting formats that you
have found to be effective for each of the above categories and why they were
effective;
DI.I Page 27 of 37
2
· Primary team members’ qualifications and roles in the project as well as relevant
past experience;
· Availability of team members;
· A description of experience in working with public sector and elected officials,
and any references to other jurisdictions; and
· Willingness to work with other consultants identified by the City.
Ten (10) copies of the SOQ must be submitted to the City of Auburn. The SOQ must be
received by 5:00 P.M. on Thursday, January 24, 2008 and shall be submitted, in a
sealed envelope, to:
Mailing Address:
Ms. Elizabeth Chamberlain
Planning Manager
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
25 West Main Street
Auburn, Washington 98001
Physical Address:
Ms. Elizabeth Chamberlain
Planning Manager
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
One East Main Street
Auburn, Washington 98001
Qualification statements received later than 5:00 P.M. January 25, 2008 will not be
considered. No facsimile or emailed SOQ’s will be accepted. Postmarks also will not
be accepted. Questions regarding this RFQ should be directed to Elizabeth
Chamberlain, (253) 931-3092 (echamberlain@auburnwa.gov) at the City of Auburn.
This RFQ is a first step toward selecting a developer for the project. Based on
responses to this RFQ, certain selected development teams may be interviewed. The
City of Auburn reserves the right to reject any and all submittals or team members and
to waive irregularities and informalities in the evaluation process. This RFQ does not
obligate the City to pay any costs incurred by respondents in the preparation and
submission of qualifications or subsequent proposals. This solicitation does not obligate
the City of Auburn to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services.
RFQ Issue Date: December 17, 2007
DI.I Page 28 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Parking Vehicles on Unimproved Surfaces in Residential
Communities
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Memorandum
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.J
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.J Page 29 of 37
Memorandum
TO: Nancy Backus, Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
John Holman, Vice Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee
Largo Wales, Member, Planning and Community Development Committee
CC: Mayor Lewis
FROM: Jeff Tate, Interim Director of Planning and Development
DATE: July 17, 2013
RE: Parking Large Vehicles in Residential Areas
Summary
Auburn City Code contains a number of provisions that regulate parking of vehicles within
residential zones. Within Title 18, the Zoning Code, the standards regulate vehicle type, parking
area location, and parking surfaces that are allowed/required on privately owned property.
Within Title 10, Vehicles and Traffic, the standards regulate vehicle type and parking duration
for vehicles parked within streets and rights-of-way. Both of these Titles are utilized when
Police or Code Enforcement respond to a complaint about a parking situation. The application
of these two Titles to several situations throughout the City has generated questions and some
confusion about how the parking standards interface.
The purpose of this memo is to provide the various code sections, explain the challenges, and
provide photographic examples of several situations with a goal of identifying any potential code
amendments and/or policy guidance that results in a more efficient, seemless and clear
implementation strategy.
Title 10 Code Overview – these standards apply within streets and rights-of-way
10.36.190 Commercial vehicles and large vehicles
A. Except as provided for in this section, no person shall park any vehicle with a gross
vehicle rating of 16,000 pounds or more, as indicated in the records of the Washington
State Department of Motor Vehicles for the vehicle, on any street, alley or public right-of-
way in the city.
10.36.191 Recreational vehicle parking
A. No person shall park any recreational vehicle on any street, alley or public right-of-way in
any residential neighborhood in the city for more than 24 hours.
10.36.192 Trailers
A. No unattached trailer, semitrailer, or pole trailer shall be parked within any city right-of-
way; provided, that an unattached trailer, semitrailer, or pole trailer with a gross vehicle
weight rating of less than 16,000 pounds, as indicated in the records of the Washington
DI.J Page 30 of 37
State Department of Motor Vehicles for the vehicle, may be parked within any city right-
of-way in a residential neighborhood in the city for up to 24 hours.
10.36.193 Larger vehicles in residential zoning districts
A. In addition to the parking regulations and restrictions set forth in this chapter, no person
shall park any vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, as
indicated in the records of the Washington State Department of Motor Vehicles for the
vehicle, on or along any street, alley or public right-of-way in a residential zoning district
of the city; provided, that this restriction shall not apply to pick-up trucks falling within the
Class 3 truck classification with a gross vehicle weight rating not exceeding 14,000
pounds. The provisions of this section do not apply to parking on or along principal
arterials or minor arterials as designated in the city’s transportation comprehensive plan.
The provisions of this section, however, do apply to parking on or along city streets in
residential zoning districts that are classified as local streets or collector arterials as
designated in the city’s transportation comprehensive plan.
The penalty for violating any of the above requirements is as follows:
The penalty for parking in violation of this section shall be a fine of $250.00 per violation, in
addition to other costs and assessments provided by law. A violation of this section shall be
considered a parking infraction and shall be processes in accordance with the state statutes,
court rules and city ordinances regarding parking infractions. Each calendar day during
which a violation occurs shall constitute a separate infraction, and each instance when a
commercial vehicle parks at a location in violation of this section shall be a separate
violation.
Title 18 Code Overview – these standards apply on private property
18.52.245 Commercial vehicle
“Commercial vehicle” means semi-truck tractors and/or semi-trailers (over 26,001 pounds
gross vehicle weight rating) used in any commercial enterprise.
18.52.050 Parking design, development, and maintenance standards
A. Location of Parking. Off-street parking areas shall be located as follows:
1. Residential Parking. Residential parking shall be located on the same site as each
residential dwelling unit served; except for a mixed-use development as defined by
ACC 18.04.625. No required residential parking space shall occupy any unimproved
area within the required front setback, or side and rear setback, except as allowed by
subsection E of this section, Surfacing of Parking Areas.
E. Surfacing of Parking Areas. Areas used for parking on private property, including interior
driveways and access to a public street, shall be paved with asphalt concrete, cement
concrete pavement, or pervious pavement and shall have appropriate bumper guards
where needed. Paving is not required for temporary parking facilities that have obtained
a temporary use permit pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 18.46A ACC,
Temporary Uses; however, dust mitigation is required. Where a driveway crosses an
improved public right-of-way, it shall be constructed with cement concrete. All pavement
sections shall be designed to support the post development traffic loads anticipated due
to the intended use as approved by the city engineer.
1 Alternative paving systems may be provided subject to the approval of the city. The
alternative must provide results equivalent to paving.
DI.J Page 31 of 37
2. For parking areas serving single-family dwellings and duplexes when located on
individual lots, this section shall apply:
a. Each off-street parking space shall be connected to an improved street or alley
by a driveway a minimum of 11 feet in width.
b. Not more than 50 percent of the front yard or 800 square feet, whichever is
smaller, can be used as off-street parking surface. For the purposes of
calculating the allowable area under this section, the front yard shall be the area
between the right-of-way and the portion of the single-family dwelling’s front
facade farthest from the right-of-way. The width of the front yard shall extend to
each side property line.
c. Driveways that exclusively serve nonrequired off-street parking spaces are also
subject to the surfacing requirement.
d. Off-street vehicle parking spaces, including those for trailers, recreational
vehicles, and boats on trailers, that are provided in addition to those required
pursuant to Table 18.52.020 shall be paved with one of the surfaces listed above
(subsection E of this section), or gravel; provided, that weeds, mud or other fine
material do not work their way to the surface of the gravel; and provided, that
loose gravel is contained on the subject property.
e. Boats not on trailers shall not be stored in the front yard.
18.52.065 Commercial vehicles in residential zones
A. No person shall park any commercial vehicle on any property within the following zoning
districts in the city: residential zones R-5, R-7, R-10, R-16, and R-20 and (PUD) planned
unit development.
B. No person shall park more than one commercial vehicle on any property within the R-1
residential zoning district in the city, and no person shall park more than two commercial
vehicles on any property within the residential conservancy RC zoning district in the city.
Code Overview
1. As noted in the bold, italicized font, there are three different weight thresholds that are
used that define parking requirements for various vehicles. The parking standards that
apply within the right-of-way apply to much smaller trucks and commercial vehicles than
those that apply in the zoning ordinance (16,000 or 10,000 lbs. vs. 26,000+ lbs.).
Question – should these figures be reconciled?
2. As noted in the underlined language, areas where vehicles are parked or stored are to
be paved or graveled. The question that is consistently posed to Code Enforcement is
whether the entire area needs to be surfaced or just strips that align with the tires. Our
response has been that the entire area needs to be surfaced.
Question – is our response to this question consistent with the intent of the language in
the code?
DI.J Page 32 of 37
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
PCDC Status Matrix
Date:
July 17, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
PCDC Status Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached matrix.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Other: Planning
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:July 22, 2013 Item Number:DI.M
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.M Page 33 of 37
PC
D
C
W
o
r
k
P
l
a
n
M
a
t
r
i
x
–
J
u
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
3
Pl
e
a
s
e
N
o
t
e
:
N
e
w
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
u
n
d
e
r
l
i
n
e
d
,
d
e
l
e
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
mo
v
e
d
.
Ju
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
3
LA
N
D
U
S
E
C
O
D
E
S
/
P
O
L
I
C
I
E
S
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
1
·
M
u
c
k
l
e
s
h
o
o
t
T
r
i
b
e
TB
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
St
a
f
f
t
o
s
t
a
y
i
n
t
o
u
c
h
w
i
t
h
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
e
p
t
.
a
n
d
k
e
e
p
coordination &
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
p
e
n
w
i
t
h
T
r
i
b
e
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
m
e
t
w
i
t
h
t
he Muckleshoot Tribe
Ma
r
c
h
2
6
,
2
0
1
2
.
2
Co
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
·
S
h
a
r
e
d
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
R
e
n
t
a
l
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Au
g
u
s
t
1
2
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
He
l
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
b
e
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n related to amending the
de
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
a
m
i
l
y
a
s
a
P
h
a
s
e
1
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
t
o
a
t
w
o
phased project. Continued
di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
o
n
6
/
2
4
/
1
3
a
n
d
r
e
t
u
r
i
n
g
to the Committee for
fu
r
t
h
e
r
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
.
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
7
/
8
/
1
3
m
e
e
t
i
ng the project would not be
br
o
k
e
n
i
n
t
o
p
h
a
s
e
s
a
n
d
m
o
v
e
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
w
i
t
h
n
e
e
d
e
d
c
o
d
e changes as one phase.
·
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
20
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
r
a
f
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
th
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
·
C
o
t
t
a
g
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
20
1
3
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
r
a
f
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
·
C
e
l
l
T
o
w
e
r
s
TB
D
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
P
C
D
C
o
n
9
/
1
0
/
1
2
a
n
d
c
o
d
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
a
t
P
lanning Commission on
10
/
2
/
1
2
.
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
r
e
t
u
r
n
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
th more information to
di
s
c
u
s
s
o
n
c
e
l
l
t
o
w
e
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
o
d
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
.
·
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
20
1
3
An
d
e
r
s
e
n
C
o
d
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
se
d
o
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
t
r
e
a
t
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
·
A
g
r
i
t
o
u
r
i
s
m
TB
D
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
St
a
f
f
t
o
b
r
i
n
g
b
a
c
k
o
n
c
e
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
h
a
s reviewed and made their
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
3
Ur
b
a
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
·
H
e
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
20
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
w
o
r
k
p
l
a
n
.
·
T
A
D
A
Sp
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
4
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Th
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
at the 3/25/13 meeting
an
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
t
u
r
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
p
r
i
n
g
o
f
2
0
1
4
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
r
a
n
n
ual update.
DI.M Page 34 of 37
Ju
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
3
Page 2
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
·
A
m
t
r
a
k
TB
D
M
a
y
o
r
L
e
w
i
s
Ci
t
y
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
p
s
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
s
t
u
dy by Amtrak. Public Works
st
a
f
f
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
a
t
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
’
s
3
/
2
5
/
1
3
meeting, the WSDOT
st
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
p
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
i
s
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d to be complete in June,
20
1
3
.
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
p
a
s
s
e
d
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
4
9
4
9
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g an Amtrak stop in
Au
b
u
r
n
.
·
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
u
r
v
e
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
and data compilation
be
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
.
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
d
r
a
f
t
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
Contents with Committee on
10
/
0
8
/
1
2
.
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
20
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
S
t
a
f
f
w
i
l
l
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
t
e
a
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a
c
t
i
o
n
pl
a
n
a
n
d
b
r
i
n
g
b
a
c
k
t
o
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
5
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
A
r
e
a
s
f
o
r
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
20
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
C
o
d
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
t
r
e
a
t
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
6
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
s
T
B
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
the remaining 6 pedestrian
ki
o
s
k
s
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
.
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
t
o
o
k
a
c
t
i
o
n
o
n
1
/
2
8
/
1
3
and recommended
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
ion of three kiosks.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
7
A
u
b
u
r
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
a
r
k
A
s
N
e
e
d
e
d
A
n
d
e
r
s
e
n
S
t
a
f
f
i
s
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
W
S
D
O
T
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n opportunities.
PA
R
K
S
,
A
R
T
S
&
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
8
L
e
a
H
i
l
l
/
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
C
C
P
a
r
k
T
B
D
F
a
b
e
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
ns
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
b
e
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
n
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
9
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
TB
D
Hu
r
s
h
PC
D
C
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
a
t
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
;
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
to be scheduled.
10
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
H
u
r
s
h
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
p
r
o
v
id
e
d
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
o
r
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
.
11
Un
i
f
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
ce
n
t
r
a
l
i
z
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
TB
D
H
u
r
s
h
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
g
i
v
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
.
DI.M Page 35 of 37
Ju
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
3
Page 3
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
BO
A
R
D
S
,
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
S
&
H
E
A
R
I
N
G
E
X
A
M
I
N
E
R
12
A
r
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
F
a
b
e
r
J
o
i
n
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
h
e
ld
o
n
1
1
/
2
6
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
13
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
H
u
r
s
h
J
o
i
n
t
m
ee
t
i
n
g
h
e
l
d
9
/
2
4
/
1
2
.
14
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
D
i
x
o
n
He
a
r
i
n
g
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
1
1
/
2
6
/
1
2
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
a
n
n
u
al briefing with the
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
15
P
a
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
J
u
l
y
2
2
F
a
b
e
r
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
pd
a
t
e
o
c
c
u
r
r
e
d
6
/
1
1
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
16
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
2
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
w
i
l
l
h
o
l
d
a
j
o
i
n
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
e
v
e
r
y
s
i
x
m
o
n
t
h
s with Planning
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
n
e
x
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
l
l
b
e
h
e
l
d
8
/
1
2
/
2
0
1
3.
17
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
a
n
d
T
r
a
i
l
s
S
p
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
4
Th
o
r
d
a
r
s
o
n
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
c
c
u
r
r
e
d
o
n
5
/
2
8
/
1
3
w
i
t
h
P
CD
C
.
18
U
r
b
a
n
T
r
e
e
B
o
a
r
d
F
a
l
l
2
0
1
3
F
a
b
e
r
A
n
n
u
a
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
cc
u
r
r
e
d
1
0
/
2
2
/
1
2
w
i
t
h
P
C
D
C
.
CO
M
P
R
E
H
E
N
S
I
V
E
P
L
A
N
/
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
(
L
o
n
g
R
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
)
19
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
T
B
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
20
1
3
–
2
0
1
4
A
u
b
u
r
n
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
.
M
a
j
o
r update of the
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
n
e
x
t
2
0
y
e
a
r
s
+
.
20
W
a
t
e
r
,
S
e
w
e
r
,
S
t
o
r
m
Sc
o
p
e
:
U
p
d
a
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
W
a
t
e
r
,
Se
w
e
r
,
a
n
d
S
t
o
r
m
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
s
i
n
c
o
n
c
e
r
t
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Up
d
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
On
-
g
o
i
n
g
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Up
d
a
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
s
a
s
the City updates its
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
.
21
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Sc
o
p
e
:
L
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
th
e
i
n
t
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
la
n
d
u
s
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
On
-
g
o
i
n
g
P
a
r
a
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
b
y
C
i
t
y
Council in 2009.
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
i
n
c
o
n
c
e
r
t
with the Comprehensive
Pl
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
DI.M Page 36 of 37
Ju
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
3
Page 4
To
p
i
c
/
I
s
s
u
e
Ne
x
t
o
n
P
C
D
St
a
f
f
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Le
a
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
22
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
(
T
I
P
)
Sc
o
p
e
:
6
-
y
e
a
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
a
t
i
s
up
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
20
1
4
Pa
r
a
Re
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
4
9
3
7
,
t
h
e
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
9
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
mprovement Program
(T
I
P
)
w
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
o
n
6
/
1
7
/
1
3
b
y
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
.
23
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
Sc
o
p
e
:
6
-
y
e
a
r
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
pl
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
p
u
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
/
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
On
-
g
o
i
n
g
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Up
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
sive plan update
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
a
p
p
roved by the City Council
12
/
1
7
/
1
2
.
OT
H
E
R
24
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
A
s
N
e
e
d
e
d
M
a
y
o
r
F
u
t
ur
e
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
s
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
DI.M Page 37 of 37