Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-29-2013 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Committee of the Whole July 29, 2013 - 5:00 PM Council Chambers AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Self-Insurance (30 Minutes)* · Self-insured Health Care · Self-insured Workers Compensation Presented by Human Resources and Risk Management Director Heineman B. Economic Impact of City of Auburn Arts & Events (30 Minutes)* Presented by Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber C. Major Projects (45 Minutes)* Presented by: Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber Interim Planning Director Jeff Tate Economic Development Director Doug Lein III. ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet. Page 1 of 50 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Self-Insurance (30 Minutes) Date: July 19, 2013 Department: Human Resources Attachments: PowerPoint Medical Self Insurance Financial Plan Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:July 29, 2013 Item Number:DI.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 2 of 50 Partially Self-Funded Health Care Proposal Revised 7/25/2013 Employer’s Health Coalition of Washington 1 DI.A Page 3 of 50 Benefits to City of Partially Self-Funding 1 •City Establishes Risk Level 2 •Data and Cost Control 3 •Benefits Control and Flexibility 4 •Health Care Reform 5 •Employer’s Health Coalition 2 DI.A Page 4 of 50 Partially Self-Funding 3 City Establishes Risk Level –City funds up to “Stop Loss” level (Maximum Claim Liability + Program Management Fee) –Risk financing tool (higher deductible = lower cost but more risk) Data and Cost Control –Provides tools to develop risk management plans for potential further savings No data or incentive with AWC (fixed premium) –2007-2013 AWC Premiums have increased 79% ($1,086 to $1,940/mo full family) Benefits Control and Flexibility –City determines coverage DI.A Page 5 of 50 Partially Self-Funding Healthcare Reform –Better control over tax consequences, fees and surcharges Employer’s Health Coalition of Washington –Experience/Buying power –Can build substantially same program for less cost 4 DI.A Page 6 of 50 Stop Loss Insurance What is Stop Loss Insurance? –Protects the City from large claims that exceed a specific limit within the plan year 2014 Optum Stop Loss Premium: $491,472 –12/12 contract (12 month incurred 12 month billed) 2015 Stop Loss will go to a 15-12 contract –Covers 2014’s Oct-Dec billings received in 2015 –One time increase as the City shifts to a 15 month contract 5 DI.A Page 7 of 50 Stop Loss Coverage “Individual or Specific” Deductible ($100,000) –Reimburses the City when a claimant’s costs exceed the individual limit ($100,000) within the plan year. Example -Employee with kidney transplant incurs $500,000 over two year time period. 1st year has $25,000 in medical bills & 2nd year has $475,000. –Stop Loss will reimburse the City $375,000. Year 1 = $0 (below the $100,000 stop loss) Year 2 = $375,000 ($475,000 -$100,000 deductible = $375,000) 6 DI.A Page 8 of 50 Stop Loss Coverage Aggregate Deductible ($4,315,828) –Provides a ceiling by setting the City’s maximum financial liability for medical expenses. –Set at 125% of the actuarially determined expected claims. –Excludes costs already reimbursed under the “Individual (Specific) Stop Loss” by carrier (no double indemnity). Example –An employee has a $6,000,000 claim only $100,000 counts toward the $5,827,502 aggregate deductible as $5,900,000 will be paid under the “Specific” stop loss deductible. Must have over 43 individual $100,000 claims to ever reach this layer. 7 DI.A Page 9 of 50 Reserves: WA State Regs Office of Risk Management regulates “self-funded” plans and requires within two years: –Approved Written Plan –16 Weeks of Claims Reserves –8 Weeks of Fixed Costs Total: $1,175,997 City Projections: –Meet 90% of reserve requirement in year 1 –Remaining 10% in year 2 8 8 Wks of Fixed Costs 16 Wks of Claims Reserves Year 2 Year 1 $1,175,997 $1,175,997 DI.A Page 10 of 50 LEOFF 1 Retiree Medical Budget (post 65 retirees) 2014 AWC budget: $518,061.96 Proposed 2014 Employers Health Coalition of Washington (EHCWA) budget: $249,353.24 Savings: $268,708.72 9 DI.A Page 11 of 50 Estimated 2014 Costs Line of Coverage 2014 AWC 2014 EHCW Medical Fully Insured Medical Premium (AWC excludes post 65 LEOFF 1)$5,011,857 N/A EHCW Maximum Liability1 $5,054,485 Post 65 LEOFF 1 Premiums (medicare eligible)$518,062 $249,353 Total Budgets $5,529,919 $5,303,838 Budget Difference between AWC vs. EHCW $(226,081) 10 1EHCW Maximum Liability = Projected maximum claim liability ($4,315,828) + fixed costs ($738,657). DI.A Page 12 of 50 Projected Reserves Accumulation Month Gross Claims Reserves Projected Claims Net Claims Reserves Cumulative Net Reserves Jan 359,652$ 32,572$ 327,080$ 327,080$ Feb 359,652$ 195,434$ 164,219$ 491,299$ Mar 359,652$ 293,151$ 66,502$ 557,800$ Apr 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 591,730$ May 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 625,659$ Jun 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 659,589$ Jul 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 693,518$ Aug 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 727,448$ Sep 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 761,377$ Oct 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 795,307$ Nov 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 829,236$ Dec 359,652$ 325,723$ 33,929$ 863,166$ Subtotal 4,315,828$ 3,452,662$ 863,166$ 226,081$ Total Reserves 1,089,247$ AWC vs EHCW Differential 11 DI.A Page 13 of 50 1st Year Projections $- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Gross Claim Reserves Projected Claims Cumulative Net Reserves Cumulative Net Reserves: $863,166 12DI.A Page 14 of 50 Ordinance Creating a new Medical Self Insurance Fund Create new fund #502 Codify in AMC 3.04 (Funds) Key provisions –Create the Medical Self Insurance fund –Appropriated fund; i.e. Council to authorize budget and any amendments to the budget –Prescribed uses of the fund and any unexpended funds –Effective immediately; Budget established starting 1/1/2014 13DI.A Page 15 of 50 Ordinance Creating a new Medical Self Insurance Fund #502 14DI.A Page 16 of 50 City of Auburn Medical Self Insurance Fund #502 Estimated Self-Funded Claims Reserves Fully Insured Transition to Self-Insured Health Plan 2014-2015 Financial Plan 2014 2015 Beginning fund balance (January 1st)$0.00 $1,089,246.52 Medical Premiums $5,054,485.17 $5,474,007.44 Expenditures Expected Claim Costs $3,452,662.44 $4,249,128.89 Fixed Costs Stop Loss Insurance 491,472.00 544,419.00 EHCW & TPA cost 247,185.12 247,185.12 Subtotal: Fixed Costs 738,657.12 791,604.12 Other Costs (226,080.91) - Total Expenditures $3,965,238.65 $5,040,733.01 Ending Fund Balance (December 31st)$1,089,246.52 $1,522,520.95 Required Reserve Level (required to meet by end of year 2; $1,175,997.23 City plan projected to meet 90% of reserve level during 1st year Note: Above table does not include additional taxes of about $50,000 due to Federal health care reform. This additional cost is expected to be offset by prescription drug rebates to the City. DRAFT: July 24, 2013 DI.A Page 17 of 50 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Economic Impact of City of Auburn Arts & Events (30 Minutes) Date: July 19, 2013 Department: Parks/Art and Recreation Attachments: Memo Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:July 29, 2013 Item Number:DI.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 18 of 50 Page 1 of 4 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Daryl Faber, Parks, Arts & Recreation Director CC: Pete Lewis, Mayor Date: July 24, 2013 Re: Economic Impact of City of Auburn Arts & Events In 2012, the Americans for the Arts released its Arts & Economic Propserity IV study to showcase the economic impact of arts at national, state and local levels. Similar economic studies have been conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts (Time and Money: Using Federal Data to Measure the Value of Performing Arts Activities); the Washington State Arts Commission (Creative Vitality 2010); and ArtsFund (2009 Economic Impact Study). According to the Arts & Economic Prosperity IV study, the nonprofit arts and culture industry generated $135.2 billion dollars of economic activity on a national level —$61.1 billion by the nation’s nonprofit arts and culture organizations in addition to $74.1 billion in event-related expenditures by their audiences. This economic activity supports 4.1 million full-time jobs. The industry also generates $22.3 billion in revenue to local, state, and federal governments every year—a yield well beyond their collective $4 billion in arts allocations. Arts and culture organizations employ people locally, purchase goods and services from within the community, and market and promote their regions. Arts organizations are rooted locally; these are jobs that cannot be shipped overseas. Like most industries, the Great Recession left a measurable financial impact on the arts—erasing the gains made during the pre-recession years, and leaving 2010 expenditures three percent behind their 2005 levels. The biggest effect of the recession was on attendance and audience spending. Inevitably, as people lost jobs and worried about losing their houses, arts attendance—like attendance to sports events and leisure travel—waned as well. Yet, even in a down economy, some communities saw an increase in their arts spending and employment. As the economy rebounds, the arts are well poised for growth. They are already producing new and exciting work—performances and exhibitions and festivals that entertain, inspire, and attract audiences. DI.B Page 19 of 50 Page 2 of 4 The Arts & Economic Prosperity IV study shows that arts and culture organizations leverage additional event-related spending by their audiences that pumps revenue into the local economy. When patrons attend an arts event they may eat dinner at a restaurant, shop in local retail stores, and have dessert on the way home. Based on the survey conducted in the study, the typical arts attendee in the population catetory of 50,000-99,999 spends $20.31 per person, per event, NOT including the cost of admission. The chart details the leverage amount to include refreshments during an event, meals before/after event, souvenirs and gifts, clothing or accessories, transportation (gas, bus, taxi), child care, lodging, and miscellaneous expenses. Median Per Person Event-Related Audience Spending Population Category 50,000-99,999: $20.31 Communities that draw cultural tourists experience an additional boost of economic activity. Tourism industry research has repeatedly demonstrated that arts tourists stay longer and spend more than the average traveler. Arts & Economic Prosperity IV reflects those findings: 32 percent of attendees live outside the county in which the arts event took place, and their event- related spending is more than twice that of their local. A vibrant arts community not only keeps residents and their discretionary spending close to home, it also attracts visitors who spend money and help local businesses thrive. The Arts & Economic Prosperity IV study offers a free calculator tool to make it possible for the City of Auburn to estimate the economic impact of spending related to City of Auburn Arts & Events as well as spending by audiences. While many of the study areas encompass the entire community, for this exercise, spending from Cultural Arts, Special Events and the Auburn Avenue Theater budgets were used to evaluate the economic impact and the audience spending was based on audiences from performing art programs, art exhibits and projects, the Auburn International Farmers Market, City of Auburn community-wide special events, and Auburn’s support of community cultural events (excluding the cost of admission). DI.B Page 20 of 50 Page 3 of 4 City of Auburn Arts & Events - Economic Impact – Using Arts & Economic Prosperity IV Calculator Direct Expenditures FTE Jobs Household Income Local Government Revenue State Government Revenue TOTAL Economic Impact of spending by City of Auburn Arts & Events in Auburn $1,372,965 50.8 $1,155,103 $47,903 $56,415 TOTAL Economic Impact of spending by audiences of City of Auburn Arts & Events Audience=129,584 (excluding the cost of admissions) $2,631,851 72.9 $1,588,875 $137,935 $149,410 TOTAL Industry Impact (sum of organization spending and audience spending) $4,004,818 123.7 $2,743,978 $185,838 $205,825 Total 2013 Arts, Events & Auburn Ave. Theater Budgets: $1,372,965 • 2013 Cultural Arts Budget (001.33.573.201.*): $518,198 • 2013 Special Events Budget (001.33.573.901.*): $341,098 • 2013 Auburn Ave. Theater Budget (001.33.575.280.*): $513,669 (inclusive of salaries, benefits, supplies, professional services, rentals, misc., interfund, capital/leases, etc.) Defining Economic Impact The Americans for the Arts proprietary study uses four economic measures to define economic impact: full-time equivalent jobs, resident household income, and local and state government revenues. Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Jobs describes the total amount of labor employed. Economists measure FTE jobs, not the total number of employees, because it is a more accurate measure that accounts for part-time employment. Resident Household Income (often called Personal Income) includes salaries, wages, and entrepreneurial income paid to local residents. It is the money residents earn and use to pay for food, mortgages, and other living expenses. Revenue to (3) Local and (4) State Government includes revenue from local and state taxes (e.g., income, property, sales, and lodging) as well as funds from license fees, utility fees, filing fees, and other similar sources. DI.B Page 21 of 50 Page 4 of 4 Direct and Indirect Economic Impact: How a Dollar is Re-spent in the Economy The Arts & Economic Prosperity IV study uses a sophisticated economic analysis called input- output analysis to measure economic impact. It is a system of mathematical equations that combines statistical methods and economic theory. Input-output analysis enables economists to track how many times a dollar is “re-spent” within the local economy, and the economic impact generated by each round of spending. How can a dollar be re-spent? Consider the following example: The Auburn Avenue Theater purchases several gallons of paint from a local hardware store for $200. The hardware store then uses a portion of the $200 to pay the sales clerk; the sales clerk re-spends some of the money at a grocery store; the grocery store uses some to pay its cashier; the cashier spends some on rent; and so on ... Thus, the initial expenditure by the theater company was followed by four additional rounds of local spending (by the hardware store, the sales clerk, the grocery store, and the cashier). • The economic impact of the theater company’s initial $200 expenditure is the direct economic impact. • The economic impacts of the subsequent rounds of local spending are the indirect impacts. Eventually, the $200 dollars will “leak out” of the local economy (i.e., be spent non-locally) and cease to have a local economic impact. In this example, if the theater company purchased the paint from a non-local hardware store there would be no local economic impact. Since the hardware store is located in City, the dollars remain within the local economy and create at least one more round of local spending by the hardware company. The total impact is the sum of the direct impact plus all indirect impacts. DI.B Page 22 of 50 Cultural Activities – 146 art and event activities Arts & Events: Audience Estimates • PAC & AAT Performances – 67 11,224 • Art Exhibits – 18 500 • Farmers Market – 16 23907 • Support of Community Cultural Events: 13 13000 • Auburn Symphony • Auburn Days • Trillium - Uniquely Auburn • Auburn Farmers Market • White River Valley Musuem - Small Works • Northwest Renaissance • Art Walk • Empty Bowls • Auburn Riverside HS (art show) • Special Events: 9 • DDDNx2 300 • Petpalooza 15000 • Clean Sweep 600 • ArtRageous 400 • 4th July 15000 • Kids Day 12000 • Vets Day 25000 • Santa Parade 5000 • Art Projects - 9 • Clean Sweep Mural • 3 Public Art Pieces (ACC, Lea Hill, Centennial Viewpoint)3 • Outdoor Sculpture Gallery 1000 • Pianos on Parade 1000 • Temporary Art Installationsx2 300 • Storefront Studios 1000 • Kids Summerstage: 6 2500 • Summer Sound/Cinema: 3 1500 • Seattle Opera: 1 100 • Soundbites: 4 250 Total Audience Estimate for 2012 129,584 City of Auburn Arts & Events - 2012 DI.B Page 23 of 50  DI.B Page 24 of 50  DI.B Page 25 of 50  DI.B Page 26 of 50 More than memorable events. Your support of arts, cultural and scientific organizations keeps our community vibrant. Arts in our Lives From arts to zoos, this region’s cultural organizations give us endless and fascinating ways to understand the world around us. They help unlock the mystery and beauty of the physical world and of the human heart and mind. They inspire innovation and creativity, add to our sense of place and enhance our quality of life. At the same time, our cultural organizations enhance our position in a global marketplace and drive our regional and state economies. Arts in our economy This study included 357 organizations in King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish Counties in Washington. It included eight disciplines or types of organizations: arts service organizations, dance, festivals, heritage, music, science, theater and visual arts. The Great Recession of 2008-09 has resulted in razor-thin profit margins for many organizations. In an apples-to- apples comparison with ArtsFund’s 2003 study we see a steady number of visitors but an increased reliance on discounted and free admissions, a reflection at least in part of these economic times. Despite this discounting, cultural organizations continue to provide a significant economic impact. Our challenge continues to be how to support these organizations so they can continue adding value to the economy and our lives. PO Box 19780 10 Harrison Street, Suite 200 | Seattle, WA 98109 T 206.281.9050 | F 206.281.9175 www.artsfund.org | info@artsfund.org Full study released January 2011 Brochure design generously donated by EXCLAIM The 2009 Economic Impact Study was made possible by a major grant of The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation. Further support was provided by a grant from The Boeing Company. PrePared By Dr. William B. Beyers Department of Geography, Box 353550 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 T 206.543.5871 | F 206.543.3313 beyers@uw.edu ProjecT SuPerviSion Dwight Gee Alyssa Simmons Executive Vice President, Program Coordinator, ArtsFund ArtsFund GMA Research Corporation 325 118th Avenue SE, Suite 104 Bellevue, WA 98005 T 425.460.8800 | F 425.460.8799 A Summary of a 2009 Economic Impact Study of Arts, Cultural and Scientific Organizations King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties, Washington Released January 2011 Cultural organizations touch our lives, minds, communities and economies. “A community needs a focal point, a symbol where its people can gather, exchange ideas and connect with each other. Understanding about an individual community takes understanding of one’s culture as well.” Source: Patron Survey Photo credits (l to r): Cover: Children watching the Jamie Adkins show, Giant Magnet Festival. Photo by Christopher Nelson; iStock Photos; Amy O’Neal, crushed, Velocity Dance Center SCUBA 2010. Photo by Tim Summers. Inside Panel: Rachel Foster and Kiyon Gaines, Opus 111, Pacific Northwest Ballet. Photo by Angela Sterling. Inside: Woodland Park Zoo. Photo by Ryan Hawk; Seattle Arts & Lectures, Writers in the Schools program. Photo by Susie Fitzhugh; Giant Magnet, Amazones. Photo by Mario Carondca. “Arts and culture are a means of communication that encourage people to empathize and expand their horizons.” Source: Patron Survey DI.B Page 27 of 50 PAtron exPenditures Spending by cultural patrons reaches far beyond the ticket office. Restaurants, hotels, retail shops and transportation- related enterprises account for almost 70 percent of spending related to attendance at cultural activities. AggregAte income Cultural organizations earn slightly more than half of what they need to cover their expenses from ticket sales. The remainder comes from a variety of contributed sources. Because the pipeline of government support is comparatively longer than for other funding sources, the share represented here does not fully reflect the severity of government- funding cuts at the time of the report’s publication. AggregAte exPenditures Most direct spending of cultural organizations goes for employee expenses. These are expenses for jobs inside the organizations and jobs with service providers outside the organizations. 0 20 40 60 80 100 n Tickets 31% n Transportation 28% n Meals/Refreshments 16% n Lodging 12% n Souvenirs/Gifts 4% n Child Care 1% n Other 8% 0 20 40 60 80 100 Other Goods & Services 10.2% n n Employee Expenses 51.8% n Taxes 0.4% Services 30.1% n Utilities & Phone 3.1% n Contract Individuals & Firms 4.5% n 0 20 40 60 80 100 Benefits, In-Kind 8% n n Earned 54% n Misc. Income 3% Foundation 5% n Corporate 4% n Individual 14% n Government 12% n 2009 new money imPActs on Puget sound region New Money Sales Impacts $573 million New Money Labor Income Impacts $247 million New Money Tax Impacts $43 million New Money Total Jobs Created 8,273 13.2 Million Visits in 2009 Annual admissions in 2009 totaled 13.2 million visits, more than three and one-half times the total population of the four counties. Of these annual admissions, 1.4 million were due to K-12 students experiencing cultural institutions using free or discounted tickets. A Delicate Balance Between Income and Expenses With total income budgets of $488 million and total expenses of $482 million, cultural organizations are just breaking even. Given the difficult state of the economy during 2009, the fact that income was slightly ahead of expense—in aggregate—points to the strong management and resilience of these groups. Providing Jobs for Our Communities In addition to directly employing people, cultural organizations create a ripple of economic activity and additional jobs through their business activities and the economic activities of their patrons. In 2009, activities of Central Puget Sound cultural organizations and patrons created a total of 33,920 direct and indirect jobs. Early Exposure Critical Fully 90 percent of current patrons of cultural organizations said they received their first exposure to cultural activities while in grade school. This reinforces the importance of early exposure. Unfortunately, school cutbacks now limit many children’s opportunities to benefit from these opportunities. Impacts In fiscal year 2009, nonprofit cultural organizations in Central Puget Sound had income budgets of $488 million. Patrons spent $712 million on tickets, dining out, lodging, transportation, child care services and other expenditures. The impacts of these expenditures reach across the economy of the entire state. 2009 imPActs on wA stAte’s economy Aggregate Sales Impacts $2 billion Labor Income Impacts $937 million Tax Impacts-Aggregate $87 million Total Jobs Created 33,920 Cultural Organizations Bring in New Money Cultural organizations attract patrons both inside and outside their communities. Approximately one quarter of economic impacts came from funding sources and patrons outside of the four-county area. These impacts are considered “new money”—funds that come here only because of the activities of local cultural institutions. DI.B Page 28 of 50 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Major Projects (45 Minutes) Date: July 19, 2013 Department: Administration Attachments: Presentation Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:July 29, 2013 Item Number:DI.C AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C Page 29 of 50 “What's Happening in Auburn” Committee of the Whole –July 29th 2013 City of Auburn City Council Presented by: Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy Interim Planning Director Jeff Tate Economic Development Manager Doug Lein ‘Your Catalyst for Success!’ DI.C Page 30 of 50 Dennis Dowdy, Public Works Director Jeff Tate, Interim Planning & Development Director Doug Lein, Economic Development Manager DI.C Page 31 of 50 DI.C Page 32 of 50 234 177 109 101 37 46 149 89 150 299 84 81 120 72 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 SFR Permits Issued by Year at the Mid-Point Mark Permit Issued -SFR DI.C Page 33 of 50 $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Series1 SFR Construction Valuation by Year at the Mid-Point Mark DI.C Page 34 of 50 158 109 131 102 78 115 118 96 103 114 86 80 109 103 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Series1 Commercial Permits Issued by Year at the Mid-Point Mark DI.C Page 35 of 50 $0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000 $100,000,000 $120,000,000 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Series1 Commercial Construction Valuation by Year at the Mid-Point Mark DI.C Page 36 of 50 DI.C Page 37 of 50 2013 Year to Date 2012 Year to Date Single Family 234 177 Single Family Value $51,330,827.00 $39,839,569.00 Commercial 158 109 Commercial Value $95,972,325.00 $13,715,600.00 Q2 2013 Q2 2012 New Business Licenses 101 139 Real Estate Excise Tax $826,000.00 $613,000.00 Sales Tax Revenue $6,800,000.00 $6,200,000.00 Grants –OPM (Q1 13)$1,706,304.00 $352,800.00 DI.C Page 38 of 50 Orion Industries –Ground Breaking June 7th Nov 2013 1590 A Street NE; 108K sq. ft; $11.5M dollars; 501c-3, Trainer of disadvantaged workers; 250 employees; Boeing supplier of the year. HSCA –Ribbon Cutting June 25th June 2013 1600 M Street NW; 144K sq. ft; $10.3M dollars; 165 living wage jobs; Hospital laundry; ‘Green’ Building O’Reilly Auto Parts Dec 2013 2 newly constructed retail stores; Auburn Way N. (near 42nd St.) & A Street S. (near Ellingson Rd.) Jimmy Johns Dec 2013 “World’s Greatest Gourmet Sandwiches”; New building; Auburn Way North across from Tops Market. Hop Jacks Aug 2013 1402 Lake Tapps Pkwy.; “A neighborhood gathering place.”; Burgers & Beer Don Giovanni Ristorante July 2013 18 Auburn Way S.; Premium Italian Restaurant; Family Owned; Montalcino Ristorante of Issaquah Novinium Grand opening held June 7th June 2013 1221 29th Street NW; Engineering firm; Relocated for expansion from Federal Way; Underground cable rejuvenation; 50 Jobs DI.C Page 39 of 50 GRCC Trades 2014 124th Street SE; City Park Property; $10.5M dollars Auburn High School 2014 Rezone of 12 parcels from R-20 to create site Ply Gem Mfr Corp Oct 2013 Expansion of 2 new production lines for new line of windows; 100 new employees; $50K training grant from Governor’s office. TTF Aero space Nov 2013 4620 B Street NE; Consolidation of 3 locations into 1 to accommodate expansion. Outlet Collection Oct 2013 $34M dollar upgrade by Glimcher, Inc.; 50 mile destination shopping draw. DI.C Page 40 of 50 Outlet Collection –Completion Oct 2013 DI.C Page 41 of 50 Orion Industries –Ground Breaking June 7th Completion Nov 2013 DI.C Page 42 of 50 HSCA –Grand Opening June 25 2013 DI.C Page 43 of 50 Auburn Market Place –December 2013 DI.C Page 44 of 50 Trek apartments DI.C Page 45 of 50 Business License Data Update Community Calendar Video Library Programming ◦Import Export Forum –Nov 2013 ◦Occupational Health ◦Energy and your Business ◦The Internet ◦Face book 101 ◦Bank and Banker Relationships 101 –July 11th ◦Affordable Health Care –June 28th DI.C Page 46 of 50 A new city wide networking event was held on June 7 with over 30 attending Held every Thursday 5:00 to 7:00 Will rotate every week Hosts ◦The Station Bistro ◦Odd Fellas ◦Zola’s ◦Auburn Wine DI.C Page 47 of 50 As we move into the 2nd half of 2013 we will be moving forward with new strategies ◦Expanding efforts with our Retail clusters throughout Auburn to match the updating by Planning strategy areas. ◦Moving forward with our IPZ committees into working sub committees ◦Proactive contacts with tier 2 blocks downtown ◦Multi Story M-1 construction DI.C Page 48 of 50 “What's Happening in Auburn” Committee of the Whole –July 29th 2013 City of Auburn City Council Presented by: Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy Interim Planning Director Jeff Tate Economic Development Manager Doug Lein ‘Your Catalyst for Success!’ DI.C Page 49 of 50 DI.C Page 50 of 50