HomeMy WebLinkAbout5030 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 3 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT WITH PIERCE COUNTY, THEREBY
AMENDING THE PIERCE COUNTY COUNTYWIDE
PLANNING POLICIES FOR CENTERS OF LOCAL
IMPORTANCE
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became
effective (Chapter 36 70A Revised Code of Washington); and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires Counties, Cities, and Towns
to plan for housing affordable to all economic segments of the population; and
WHEREAS, on January 31, 1995, the Pierce County Council passed Resolution
R95-17 affirming the commitment of the County to continue discussions with other local
jurisdictions to resolve implementation of the Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies are written policy
statements which are to be used solely for establishing a countywide framework from
which the County and Municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted; and
WHEREAS, the City participated in the amendment process and helped develop
the proposed Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies through participation in
Pierce County's Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC), a staff level
committee that reviews amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies and makes recommendations to the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC);
and
Resolution No. 5030
January 8, 2014
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Regional Council recommended adoption of the
proposed amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies on March
21, 2013, and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Council adopted Ordinance No 2013-53s on
September 24, 2013; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
must be adopted through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or by a new
interlocal agreement ratified by 60 percent of member jurisdictions in Pierce County
representing 75 percent of the total population; and
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement titled "Amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies" was developed for the purpose of implementing the
recommended amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies are attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute the interlocal agreement for the
purpose of amending the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies in accordance
with the requirements of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter 39.34 RCW.
Section 3. That a copy of the resolution and signed interlocal agreement
authorizing approval shall be provided to Pierce County
Section 4. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Resolution No. 5030
January 8, 2014
Page 2 of 3
Section 5. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and signed this �?/—sr day of hitiu 2014.
CI Y OF AUBURN
a
ANCY A KUS
MAYO
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS T ORM:
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Resolution No. 5030
January 8, 2014
Page 3 of 3
Pierce County Regional Council
2401 South 35th Street, Room 228
Tacoma, Washington 98409
(253) 798-7156
February 2,2012
To: Mayor,Staff and PCRC Representatives
RE Centers of Particular Local Interest
At the meeting of the Pierce County Regional Council(PCRC)on January 26,2012,a discussion occurred specific
to"Centers of Particular Interest"as it relates to VISION 2040's(V2040)language referring to"town centers and
activity nodes"and the allocation of transportation funding. This discussion was initiated through a request by the
Pierce County Transportation Coordinating Committee(TCC)with consultation with the Pierce County Growth
Management Coordinating Committee(GMCC).
As you are aware,we are on the verge of beginning another cycle of competition for federal funds managed by
PSRC. Historically, for the Countywide share of the funds(not the Regional share), the policy has been that
transportation projects in or serving local centers as well as Regional Centers were eligible to receive federal
funding;however,since there was no definition or identification of these areas the TCC Scoring Committee has had
to take a more subjective approach to determine if a project was really associated with a local center. Consequently,
each member of the Scoring Committee has been left to determine individually which projects adequately support
V2040's"town centers and activity nodes"language. The PCRC is being asked to remove this subjectivity from this
year's Countywide funding scoring process. This may be achieved through the identification/compilation of"Local
Centers"as submitted by the County and cities and towns and agreed to by the PCRC.
Al this time PCRC is formally requesting a list and supporting documentation from each jurisdiction specifying its
"local centers"and"activity nodes." Supporting documentation could include any past legislative action,a
completed study,a master plan or anything else ajurisdiclion believes makes its case for the local significance of a
particular area. The submitted local centers will be compiled on a map and presented to the GMCC along with the
associated documentation. Please note that this process is completely separate from the CPPs formal process for
jurisdictions to nominate new Regional Growth Centers and Manufacturing Centers.
Again, it has not yet been determined by PCRC if this list will be used in the current round of Countywide
competitive federal transportation funding through PSRC. If agreed lo,we would use the list solely to aid in scoring
application for the current(2012)funding competition. Our intention is to have the GMCC review the submitted
proposals and forward a recommendation to the PCRC for consideration at its March meeting.
Because of the tight timeline associated with the transportation funding process, it is vital that the GMCC be able to
start reviewing any Local Centers to be considered at its next meeting on February 23. Please submit your list and
supporting documentation to Toni Fairbanks,PCRC Clerk,at tfairba(cilco.oierce.wa.us. If you have any technical
questions,please direct them through your GMCC representative to Ian Munce, imunce(ailci.tacoma.wa us. Only
proposals submitted by 4:30 p.m.on February 17,2012,will be considered.
Thhaa/�nk you,
/�/,�
Glenn Hull
PCRC Chair.
i
REGEOVED
Pierce County 0 5 2013
Regional Council
2401 South 35th Street,Room 175 tu.Y(. 'S OFFICE
Tacoma,Washington 98409-7460
DATE. October 31, 2013 ) A/t�
TO: Pierce County City and Town Mayors and Council Members !/'��"'
Pierce County Regional Council Members(PCRC)
Pierce County City and Town Clerks
SUBJECT Interlocal Agreement-Amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies, Centers of Local Importance (CoLIs)
The Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) recommended the enclosed amendments to the Pierce
County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). As the first step in the ratification process,the Pierce
County Council adopted Ordinance No. 2013-53s on September 24, 2013 This action signifies
Pierce County's approval of the proposed amendment to set guidelines in the establishment of
Centers of Local Importance (CoLI), and authorizes the Pierce County Executive to execute
interlocal agreements with the Cities and Towns of Pierce County to ratify the proposal. This
correspondence is the official transmittal of the PCRC's recommendation to amend the CPPs, and
request for ratification of the proposal.
The proposal incorporates designation criteria into the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies (CPPs) for a new type of center for land use and transportation planning purposes. A
Center of Local Importance (CoLI), as depicted through VISION 2040, represents the lowest
level of Centers. These areas may include downtowns, as well as smaller-scaled neighborhood
business districts and crossroads.
As proposed, ajurisdiction first depicts its CoLI through its comprehensive plan. The
information in the local plan must include a map defining the area, as well as other details such
as the land use designation(s) and infrastructure plans. Notification to the Pierce County
Regional County (PCRC) must occur as a part of the local planning process. When the local
process is complete, a locally designated CoLI is included within an appendix to the CPPs.
For this proposal to be amended into the CPPs, it must be ratified by Pierce County jurisdictions.
Ratification is achieved once 60 percent of the jurisdictions in Pierce County representing 75
percent of the total population approve the proposal.Demonstration of approval may be executed
through an interlocal agreement,or the absence of a legislative action to disapprove the proposed
amendment by March 23, 2014.Note. This is a new 180-day approval process established through
the latest amendments to the CPPs.
If your jurisdiction is in favor of this proposal, it may either:
• Pass an ordinance/resolution within the interlocal agreement and CoLI amendment language; or
• Take no action addressing the proposed amendment.
If yourjurisdiction is not in favor of the proposal, it should pass a resolution stating its opposition.
Pierce County Mayors,Council Mernbers, PCRC Mernbers,Clerks
October 31,2013
Page 2
The Pierce County Ordinance,which includes the interlocal agreement and amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies, and an explanatory sheet are included for your convenience.Note
that jurisdictions do not have the ability to nrake line item modifications.
1 f your jurisdiction takes action to ratify the proposal, send two original signed copies of the
interlocal agreement and a copy of your resolution,ordinance,or meeting minutes authorizing
approval to:
Pierce County Planning and Land Services
Attn: Cindy Anderson
2401 South 35th Street, Room 175
Tacoma, WA 98409
All information must be received in our office no later than March 23,2014.One copy will be
returned to your jurisdiction after it has been signed by the Pierce County Executive.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions,please contact Dan Cardwell,
dcardwe a co.nierce.wa.us, (253) 798-7039, or me cander5 a c"erce.wa.us,(253)798-2630.
Sincerely,
Cindy Anderson
Clerk, Pierce County Regional Council
Enclosures
c: Growth Management Coordinating Committee
ad mm\perc\countywjde planning po1j6es\2013\Co1-I Interlocal Agreement Ltr 1030 13.doc<
1 Sponsored by- Councllmembers Rick Talbert and Stan Flemming
2 Requested by: Executive/Planning and Land Services i
3
4
5
6 ORDINANCE NO. 2013-53S
7
8
9 An Ordinance of the Pierce County Council Acknowledging its Approval of
10 a Proposed Amendment to Incorporate Criteria for the
11 Designation of Centers of Local Importance in the Pierce
12 County Countywide Planning Policies as Recommended by
13 the Pierce County Regional Council; Authorizing the Pierce
14 County Executive to Execute Interlocal Agreements with the
15 Cities and Towns of Pierce County to Ratify the Proposed
16 Amendments; and Adopting Findings of Fact.
17
18 Whereas, the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC)was created in 1992 by
19 interlocal agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County
20 Government(the County), and charged with responsibilities, including: serving as a
21 local link to the Puget Sound Regional Council, promoting intergovernmental
22 cooperation, facilitating compliance with the coordination and consistency requirements
23 of the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A., Revised Code of Washington [RCWI)
24 and the Regional Transportation Planning Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and
25 developing a consensus among jurisdictions regarding the development and
26 modification of the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies; and
27
28 Whereas, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) are written
29 policy statements which are to be used solely for establishing a cwuntywlde framework
3o from which the County and municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted;
31 and
32
33 Whereas, the framework is intended to ensure that the County and municipal
34 comprehensive plans are consistent; and
35
36 Whereas, the County adopted its initial CPPs on June 30, 1992; and
37
38 Whereas, the Pierce County Growth Management Coordinating Committee
39 1 (GMCC) is a technical subcommittee to the PCRC, and the GMCC includes staff
40 representatives from the County and the cities and towns within Pierce County; and
41
42 Whereas, the PCRC, based upon the recommendation from the GMCC and its
43 1 own discussions, recommended approval of the proposal at its March 21, 2013 meeting;
44 and
45
46 Whereas, amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies must
47 be adopted through amendment of the original intedocal agreement or by a new
i
Ordinance No, 2013-53s Pierce County Council
Pagel of 990TaomaAa$,Rm168
Tewme,WA B996Y v�
1 Interlocal agreement ratified by 60 percent of member jurisdictions in Pierce County
2 representing 75 percent of the total population; and
3
4 Whereas, demonstration of ratification shall be by execution of an interlocal
5 agreement or the absence of a legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment;
6 and
7
8 Whereas, an Interlocal Agreement entitled "Amendments to the Pierce County
9 Countywide Planning Policies" has been developed for this purpose, and is included as
10 Exhibit B to this Ordinance; and
11
12 Whereas, a jurisdiction shall be deemed as casting an affirmative vote If it has
13 not.taken legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment within 180 days from
14 the date the Pierce County Council formally authorizes the Pierce County Executive to
15 enter Into an interlocal agreement; and
16
17 Whereas, when ratified by the necessary number of cities and towns, Section
18 19D.240 of the Pierce County Code (PCC), "Pierce County Countywide Planning
19 Policies", shall be amended by a subsequent ordinance of the County Council to
20 incorporate the recommended proposal; and
21
22 Whereas, the Pierce County Planning Commission, at its May 28, 2013, regular
23 public hearing, reviewed the proposed amendments to the Pierce County Countywide
24 Planning Policies and recommended denial; and
25
26 Whereas, an environmental review of the proposed amendments to the Pierce
27 County Countywide Planning Policies was conducted pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW
26 and a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on June 26, 2013; and
29
30 Whereas, after a properly noticed public hearing, the Community Development
31 Committee of the Pierce County Council considered oral and written testimony and
32 forwarded Its recommendation to the full County Council; and
33
34 Whereas, the County Council held a public hearing on September 10, 2013,
35 where oral and written testimony was considered; and
36
37 Whereas, the County Council finds that it is in the public Interest to authorize the
38 Pierce County Executive to execute the interlocal agreement; Now Therefore,
39
40 BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of Pierce County:
41
42 Section 1. The Pierce County Council acknowledges its approval of the
43 amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies recommended by the
44 Pierce County Regional Council as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
45 incorporated herein by reference.
46
Ordinance No. 2013-53s Pierce County Council
Page 2 of 3 930 Ta.re Aye 5,Rm ta6
Tacoma,WA Bbt02
i
1 Section 2. The Pierce County Council authorizes the Pierce County Executive to
2 execute Interlocal Agreements as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and
3 incorporated herein by reference, thereby ratifying the attached amendments to the
4 Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the Pierce County
5 Regional Council.
6
7 Section 3. The Pierce County Council adopts Findings of Fact as shown in
8 Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
9
10 PASSED this a!day of n%6" , 2013.
11
12 ATTEST: PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL
13 Pierce County, Washington
16 i ..`SQi Yom`• JQ'k n rgoU
17 Denise D. Johnson /Joy 6e McDonald
18 Clerk of the Council Council Chair
19
20
21
22 Pat McCarthy
23 Pierce County xe
24 Approved eto d this
25 day of
26 2013.
27
28 Date of Publication of
29 Notice of Public Hearing: C( /U( Q y^1 __Ij
30 EA' V3 t �` 3
31 Effective Date of Ordinance: n
32
Ordinance No. 2013-53s Pierce County Council
Page 3 of 3 GM Tnww Ave s,nm Iona
T...,WA B 02
i
1 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2013-53s
2
3
4
5
5 Proposed Amendment
to the
s Pierce County Countywide Planning
9 to
10 Incorporate Criteria for the Designation
11 of
12 Centers of Local Importance
13
I
i
I
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2013.53s Pierce county council
Page 1of3 BWTacomanes,F �oae
Tom,W, ee�oz
1 All text shown below is new.
2
3
4 Centers of Local Importance(CoLI)—Page 60:
5
6 Introduction language
7 CoUs are designated for the purpose of identifying local centers and activity nodes that are
8 consistent with VISION 2040's Multi-county Planning Policies. Such areas promote compact,
9 pedestrian-oriented development with a mix of uses, proximity to diverse services, and a variety
10 of appropriate housing options, or be in an established industrial area.
11
12 Rural Areas—Page 62:
13
14 Rur-21. A CoLI may be located in a rural designated area.
15
16 21.1 A CoLI within a rural area shall encompass similar design features as
17 identified in UGA-48 through UGA-52.
18
19 21.2 To be officially recognized, a CoLI within a rural area shall meet the same
20 implementation strategy/process as set forth in UGA-53 through UGA-55.
21
22 Startine on Page 81:
23
24 Introduction language
25 CoLIs are designated for the purpose of identifying local centers and activity nodes that are
26 consistent with VISION 2040's Multicounty Planning Policies. Such areas promote compact,
27 pedestrian-oriented development with a mix of uses, proximity to diverse services, and a variety
28 of appropriate housing options, or be in an established industrial area.
29
30 Urban Growth Areas - Page 104:
31
32 Centers of Local Importance(CoLI)
33 Concepts and Principles
34
35 UGA-49. A CoLI may be located in either an urban or rural area, and shall include activities
36 that provide a focal point or sense of place for a community and its surrounding
37 area.
38
39 Design Features of CoLls
411
41 UGA-50. A CoLI is characterized by a concentration of land uses or activities that provide a
42 sense of place or gathering place for the community and neighborhood residents.
43 A CoLI should include one or more the following characteristics:
44
45 50.1 Civic services
46 50.2 Commercial areas
47 50.3 Recreational areas
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2013-53s Pierce County Council
Page 2 of 3 Sao ratan.Ave 5,Rm to48
T.w. . WA 88403
i
I
I
1 50.4 Industrial areas j
2 50.5 Cultural facilities/activities
3 50.6 Historic buildings or sites
4 50.7 Residential areas
5
6 UGA-51. The size of a CoLI and the mix and density of uses are to be locally determined to
7 meet community goals.
8
9 UGA-52. Each jurisdiction shall define the role that the CoL1 plays in supporting planned
10 growth.
11
12 UGA-53. A variety of appropriate transportation options and pedestrian-friendly design
13 should be available or planned within a CoLI.
14
15 Implementation Strategies
16
17 UGA-54. A CoLf shall be locally adopted;approval by the PCRC or other regional
18 organization shall not be required.
19
20 54.1 A jurisdiction shall document how an area meets the Design Features
21 (UGA-48 through UGA-52) of a CoLI in its comprehensive plan.
22 54.2 The documentation should include examples,plans,or other information
23 that supports the designation of a CoLI.
24 54.3 An area adopted as a CoLl shall be definitively delineated on a map within
25 a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan.
26 54.4 A CoLI shall have appropriate land use designations, zoning regulations,
27 and infrastructure plans for existing and planned development.
28 54.5 A comprehensive plan that utilizes an alternative label to refer to a CoLI
29 shall be accompanied with adopted findings of fact that recognizes the
30 area as a CoLI per the Pierce County CPPs.
31
32 UGA-55. A jurisdiction shall provide the PCRC notice of its intention to locally adopt a
33 CoLI or recognize formally adopted CoLls that meet the criteria.
34
35 55 1 The notice shall be provided to the PCRC 60 days(minimum)prior to the
36 expected dated of adoption.
37 55.2 The notice shall provide information that identifies the location of the
38 proposed CoLI and documents how the location meets the CoLI policies.
39
40 UGA-56. A locally adopted CoLI shall be recognized in Appendix B of the CPPs,
41
i
42 56.1 Jurisdictions shall forward a map of locally adopted CoLIs together with
43 the comprehensive plan citations to the PCRC for inclusion into Appendix
44 B. The adopted CoLls shall be attached to the CPP publications as
45 . Appendix B for ease of reference. Appendix B shall not be considered a
46 component of the CPPs and, accordingly, an update to Appendix B shall
47 not constitute an amendment to the CPPs requiring ratification by Pierce
48 County jurisdictions.
Exhibit A to Ordinance No.2013-53s Pierce County Council
Page 3 of 3 930 Tecomo Ave 8,Rm 1046 f(�
Tacoma,I 99a9Y
!
I
i
1 Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2013-53s
2
3 FINDINGS OF FACT
4
5 The Pierce County Council finds that:
6
7 1. The Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC)was created in 1992 by interlocal
8 agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County
9 Government(the County), and charged with responsibilities, including: Serving as a
10 local link to the Puget Sound Regional Council(PSRC), promoting intergovernmental
11 cooperation,facilitating compliance with the coordination and consistency
12 requirements of the Growth Management Act[GMA] (Chapter 36.70A RCW)and the
13 Regional Transportation Planning Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing
14 a consensus among jurisdictions regarding the development and modification of the
15 Countywide Planning Policies.
16
17 2. The GMA required the County to adopt a countywide planning policy in cooperation
18 with the cities and towns located within Pierce County.
19
20 3. The Countywide Planning Policies are to be used for establishing a county-wide
21 framework from which the comprehensive plans for Pierce County and the cities and
22 towns within Pierce County are developed and adopted.
23
24 4. On June 30, 1992, the Pierce County Council passed No. Ordinance 92-74 adopting
25 the initial Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies,
26
27 5. The GMA requires the central Puget Sound region to adopt multi-county planning
28 policies.
29
30 6. The PSRC membership is comprised of central Puget Sound counties (King, Pierce,
31 Snohomish, and Kitsap), cities and towns, ports, tribes, and transit agencies.
32
33 7. The PSRC is the regional authority to adopt multl-county planning policies.
34
35 8. The PSRC adopted VISION 2040 at its May 2008 General Assembly meeting.
36
37 9. VISION 2040 is the central Puget Sound region's multi-county planning policies.
38
39 10. VISION 2040 recognizes "many secondary hubs and concentrations of development
40 also serve important roles as places for concentrating jobs, housing, shopping, and
41 recreational opportunities."
42
43 11 VISION 2040 recognizes "small neighborhood centers and even activity hubs that
44 serve as the crossroads in cities and communities of all sizes are also key in
45 Implementing a centers-based approach to development in the region."
46
47 12, VISION 2040 policy MPP-DP-13 "directs subregional funding,especially county-level
48 and local funds, to centers designated through countywide processes, as well as town
49 centers, and other activity nodes."
50
51 13. The PCRC directed the Growth Management Coordinating Committee to recommend
52 policies to designate Centers of Local Importance (CoLI).
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2013-53s Pierce County Council
Page 1 of 3 B30 Tacoma A.S,I IBCB
I...W, Bd17L
1
2 14. The GMCC recommended new policies that set criteria and a process for the formal
3 recognition of areas that serve as important centers within Pierce County communities.
4
5 15. This formal recognition may be used in future countywide project evaluations.
6
7 16. Designated CoLI may be Incorporated Into scoring criteria for the future distribution of
8 subregional funding.
9
10 17. The PCRC based upon the recommendation from the GMCC, and its own discussions,
11 recommended approval of the proposal at their March 21, 2013 meeting.
12
13 18, The Pierce County Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposal at its
14 May 28, 2013 meeting.
15
16 19. The Pierce County Planning Commission recommendation to disapprove the proposal
17 was the result of a tie vole (2-2).
18
19 20. An environmental review of the proposed amendments to the Pierce County
20 Countywide Planning Policies was conducted pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW, and a
21 Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on June 26, 2011
22
23 21 The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies include provisions addressing
24 procedures for amending the Countywide Planning Policies.
25
26 22. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies require amendments to the
27 Countywide Planning Policies to be adopted through an amendment of the original
28 Interlocal Agreement or by a new interlocal agreement. The amendment will become
29 effective when 60 percent of the cities, towns, and the County, representing 75 percent
30 of the total population as designated by the State Office of Financial Management at
31 the time of the proposed ratification become signatories to the agreement,
32
33 23. A demonstration of ratification shall be by execution of an Interlocal agreement or the
34 absence of a legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment.
35
3e 24. A jurisdiction shall be deemed as casting an affirmative vote If it has not taken
37 legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment within 180 days from the date
38 the Pierce County Council formally authorizes the Pierce County Executive to enter
39 into an interlocal agreement.
40
41 25. The Community Development Committee of the County Council, after a properly
42 noticed public hearing, considered oral and written testimony, and forwarded its
43 recommendation to the full Council.
44
45 26. The County Council held a public hearing on September 10, 2013, where oral and
46 written testimony was considered.
47
48 27. It Is in support of the amendment for providing consistency between the Pierce
49 Countywide Planning Policies and VISION 2040.
50
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2013.53s Pierce County Council
Page Pa 2 of 3 030 Tawree Ave S.Rm 1040
9 Tecame,WA 00402
1
2 28. A subsequent ordinance of the County Council shall be necessary to acknowledge the
3 ratification process and amend Section 19D.240 PCC, 'Pierce County Countywide
4 Planning Policies
5
6 29. It is in the public interest to authorize the Pierce County Executive to execute the
7 interlocal agreements.
8
i
i
Exhibll C to Ordinance No. 2013-53s Plerce County Council
Page 3 of 3 030 THOM An 5,Rm 1048
THOM,I 6040]
Regioiial Centers
-F -d.-: 4 E. •. I.;' .�..F. � , ' Candidate ��,.•°ca ury lxoc.m.n
'L.,m. •ta,_ +""E `7 ��• ." '.i ,'
st,
in' rnpetition
f.s
VI
Ma-rch 2012
:, •,.
,'>`j 1. 'i• �'�, ^F�-1.l
7.
- :mot`-f -:a�•�.,:,�.a.T`�:��,��'IF",'.:�: i'.nCV"�i .�=t'``I ' �'4ii;;�'.:,..�.,.�.
4
`-� , �1 —. T��ilr<.u�l.ii:_.I.,>.; +t.:\-F•.,.,!_';.' ` ,r., F� i-�'•1 �`" I--� � ..
_ ,:r,K•+fib t ��°'Y� s ..'�°' ':;-'1eJ. ��_.S� .�,- `i : .j,�.• el ii ��,�1',:.,, •t_
..i"J�l yC ."T P: .ii:_Ar _,. rt' «. �,- ,,5�•L4',t d '�i:,w „ • ,, r�J
-•-,--•-=di{''«'SS-``�.' e,-r: 'r.�iw;'Y�':�"�;.3.. I�. E t.\ ' ��r' - �'i.�•,^{""'ei:.t., •'Y�`i� :,•:fl),l:'� d. ..
.r.. •�t������.i�i ,�'...: I:,. �'�"::.1 _,_ry.;+..4".., I,F� �t•A'!'<... E51�ai'• ,.�. l= i .\.
;.: /I:i`.� w r�,-S-;T fld,- - r��v`. =`:r`" I'�' r:-_•�, ,jt;.': ��'t�". a. ''� r g!-`;.'-t:=1;wy7",t5°,°.' I. .«.i _ _
`f„_ ., ri"''z,{e.(�ti - - '.�' �� ..�;-.a.n,•^�i F l��ri•- .17.i• i j,l�__`-• �n' . � `�ff'_tite'- i�
, \,J - is *,i i•:J;r:,i$' li �4ji.;. "� .;�lilj Er•�- t?f'�..(:.,.��e r I ,y�_k{. �;.'s, r'�_ --
i r' --� / �` �;-� ,e'- 1..:.ti ie_"t�F_1 t`.,:m.::•' i:F`:\:..ti' 1-P.-° '.;'r..=:JF�k I�"'�r.,,.
':• LEA t o �'� - iMV 'L� �'[S I:L _:..:�F •I �W=I�tT� ���' P,Y.
$ ,. tt
I >J`1"t:-�4:>�°.i-1 I h- i.” ; L�F:. �:,_rn.,.-i rl�i;I I ,` 'i• �`• ~i `-"
.. '.g� �4a ,.�•. «;��W. ,� ���,_,^i",_._.:� Tf _ .f,�i-y�sj rL.Fti`°'S -�=�' ` ^r -J -�
i�
1 )�
f :il p .=1°_ I is•;yf-;._'
t � �� _ _-. _-.I I -f l-.,I•'.�':li �a1 I '�-.E� p -1 �t•°j i.4 I
I��i '�•ali-•1s'I`L ".t:- { ,z- )4- L1
- ..Y- _:
rT
., , 1 �• LP
j ��''_1 I L I•I �6 I I ��' I r fI �r - _'..�.... 1,t _ner...
-I If_