HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-13-2017 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDACity Council S tudy Session HHS S FA
Nov ember 13, 2017 - 5:30 P M
City Hall Council Chambers
AGE ND A
Watch the meeting v ideo
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I .C A L L TO O R D E R
A.R oll Call
I I .A NNO UNC E ME NT S R E P O RT S A ND P R E S E NTAT I O NS
I I I .A G E ND A I T E MS F O R C O UNC I L D I S C US S I O N
A.R esolution No. 5317 - Grant P olicy Update (10 Minutes) (Coleman)
A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, approving the grant
management administrative policy
B.R esolution No. 5326 (30 Minutes) (Coleman)
A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to execute an addendum to the agreement with the A uburn Valley Humane
S ociety to provide animal licensing services
C .Ordinance No. 6664 - Property Tax L evy (15 Minutes) (Coleman)
A n O rdinance of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, establishing the
levy for regular property taxes by the City of Auburn for collection in 2018 for general
city operational purposes in the amount of $21,548,429.00
D .B udget Amendment #4 (Mid-B iennium C orrection) (20 Minutes) (Coleman)
B udget Amendment #4 (Mid-B iennium C orrection)
E.R esolution No. 5319 - 2018 F ee S chedule (15 Minutes) (Heid)
A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, amending the City
of A uburn F ee S chedule to adjust for 2018 f ees
F.Traffic I mpact F ee Update (10 Minutes) (S nyder)
D iscuss the recommended update to the transportation impact f ee program for 2018
G.2018 V R FA F ee Schedule Update (10 Minutes) (Snyder)
H.Ordinance No. 6659 - S O D A R elating to New Gross Misdemeanor Violations
C oncerning Drug-related A ctivities (15 Minutes) (Heid)
A n O rdinance of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, amending S ection
1.24.010 of the A uburn City C ode and creating a new Chapter 9.24 of the Auburn City
C ode relating to new gross misdemeanor violations concerning drug-related activities
I .Frequency of Special Focus A rea Meetings (10 Minutes) (C ouncil)
I V.HE A LT H A ND HUMA N S E RV I C E S D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
Page 1 of 244
A.P resentation from Bookda Gheisar, King C ounty I mmigrant and R efugee Policy &
S trategy A nalyst and Tim Warden-Hertz, Northwest I mmigrant Rights P roject (60
Minutes)
B.C ommunity Development Block Grant A ction Plan Update (15 Minutes) (Hinman)
V.O T HE R D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
V I .NE W B US I NE S S
V I I .MAT R I X
A.Matrix
V I I I .A D J O UR NME NT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail . Complete agenda packets are available for revi ew
at the City Clerk's Office.
Page 2 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda S ubjec t:
Resolution No. 5317 - Grant Polic y Upd ate (10 Minutes ) (Co leman)
Date:
Novemb er 7, 2017
Department:
Financ e
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5317
Grants Policy
Budget Imp act:
Adminis trative R ecommend ation:
City Counc il review Res o lutio n No. 5317.
Background S ummary:
Federal award s for lo cal government were previo us ly aud ited und er the provis io ns o f Circular No s . A-
87, A-102, and A-133. T he new guidanc e Uniform Adminis trative Requirements , Co s t Principles, and
Aud it Req uirements fo r F ed eral Awards pub lis hed in T itle 2 o f the Cod e of Federal Regulatio ns (2 CFR
200) s upers ed es requirements from thes e c irc ulars b y way of cons o lidatio n into a s treamlined format to
imp ro ve trans parency.
The “unifo rm requirements ” plac e heavy emp has is o n written polic ies and p ro cedures . To meet the new
fed eral req uis ites , it is necessary to revis e the C ity’s existing adminis trative polic y.
The fo cus and intent of thes e polic ies and p ro cedures is to ensure that tho s e within the organizatio n who
carry out the o b jectives o f the award unders tand:
the fed eral s tatutes, regulatio ns, and terms and cond itions of the award,
how to evaluate and p ro p erly monitor c ompliance, and
the s teps to take if noncompliance is id entified .
Sec tion 4.9 Code of Conduct pertains to all elected offic ials , emp lo yees , and agents o f the City and
therefo re req uires Counc il approval. The new polic y must be ap p ro ved prior to Dec emb er 14, 2017 in
o rd er to avoid an audit find ing.
Reviewed by C o uncil Committees:
Counc ilmember:S taff:C o leman
Meeting Date:No vember 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 3 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5317
November 6, 2017
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5317
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING
THE GRANT MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY
WHEREAS, the City regularly receives federal grant awards for a variety
of purposes; and
WHEREAS, the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
issued new uniform guidance to streamline the federal grant process; and
WHEREAS, OMB’s uniform guidance requires nonfederal entities to have
certain written policies and procedures to address the management of grant
award funds; and
WHEREAS, these requirements aim to reduce the risk of fraud, waste,
and abuse of federal funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the policy and procedures for grant management, index
number 100-25, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein by this reference, is approved and the Mayor is authorized to
implement the same.
Section 2. That the Mayor is further authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this
legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon.
Page 4 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5317
November 6, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2017.
CITY OF AUBURN
________________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Page 5 of 244
Exhibit A
Page 6 of 244
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
SUBJECT: FINANCE
INDEX NUMBER: 100-25
EFFECTIVE DATE
SUPERSEDES
11/1/2011
PAGE
1 OF 10
PREPARED BY:
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
MAYOR’S APPROVAL
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
1.0 PURPOSE
To establish and maintain policy and internal controls that provide reasonable assurance
that Federal awards are being managed in compliance with all Federal regulations and
with the terms and conditions of the award. The City of Auburn will follow the Uniform
Guidance, the Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) distributed by the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
funding, and other specific grant requirements or guidance documents published by the
Federal Granting Agency such as the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as applicable.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONS AFFECTED
All departments/divisions receiving Federal Awards.
3.0 REFERENCES
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards – Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200); State and Local
guidelines will also apply based on awarding organization.
4.0 POLICY
4.1 General: This policy describes the procedure for the administrative responsibility
of awards received as grants (or grant-like loans such as low-interest loans
provided by the Washington State Public Works Board). The City, through
designated staff and City officials, solicits and accepts awards from a variety of
organizations for funding City programs and projects. Awards frequently require
close coordination between different City departments and adherence to strict
guidelines and requirements. This policy outlines the procedures and
departmental roles and responsibilities to centrally coordinate and track citywide
efforts in grant management and administration.
4.1.1 The Department that is requesting and/or administering the grant award
shall be responsible for maintaining accurate and current information and
complying with the general and specific guidelines and requirements of the
grant award. This will include:
• being knowledgeable of grant award requirements,
• ensuring the City complies with said requirements,
Page 7 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
2 OF 10
• providing accurate information to the Finance Department in the
preparation of reports and requests for reimbursement of eligible
costs, and
• maintaining the proper written and electronic documentation and
financial records consistent with said requirements.
4.1.2 In the event more than one Department is involved in requesting or
administering a grant award, the Departments involved will agree upon a
designated lead Department. The lead Department will have overall
responsibilities for administering the grant award consistent with this policy.
4.2 Internal Controls: The City of Auburn will maintain effective internal control over
the Federal Award providing reasonable assurance that the City is managing the
Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and
conditions of the Federal award.
4.2.1 The City will take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are
identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings.
4.2.2 The City will take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally
identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency
or pass-through entity designates as sensitive.
4.2.3 The City will follow the process workflow outlined in section 6.1.
4.3 Certification: To assure that expenditures are proper and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Federal award and approved project budgets, the
annual and final fiscal reports or vouchers requesting payment under the
agreements must include a certification, signed by an official who is authorized to
legally bind the non-Federal entity, which reads as follows: “By signing this report,
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete,
and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the
purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of
any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for
fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise.”
4.4 Advance Payments and Reimbursements: Payment methods must minimize the
time elapsing between transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the
pass-through entity and the disbursement by the City of Auburn whether the
payment is made by electronic transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks,
warrants, or payment by other means.
4.4.1 Advanced payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and
be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash needs of the
City to carry out the purpose of the approved program or project. Any
advanced payments must be consolidated to cover anticipated cash needs.
4.4.2 The City shall minimize the time elapsed between receipt of federal aid
funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs.
4.5 Allowable Costs: Federal awards will meet the following general criteria in order
to be allowable except where otherwise authorized by statute.
Page 8 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
3 OF 10
4.5.1 Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.
4.5.2 Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in
the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.
4.5.3 Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both
Federally-financed and other activities of the City.
4.5.4 Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal
award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like
circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.
4.5.5 Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).
4.5.6 Not be included as cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching
requirements of any other Federally-financed program in either the current
or a prior period.
4.5.7 Be adequately documented.
4.6 Procurement: When procuring goods and services under a Federal award, the
City will follow 2 CFR §200.318 General Procurement Standards through §200.326
Contract Provisions or City of Auburn purchasing procedures (Auburn City Code
Chapters 3.10, 3.12, and 3.14), whichever is more restrictive.
4.6.1 Contracts for more than the simplified acquisition threshold currently set at
$150,000 must address administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in
instances where contractors violate or breach contract terms, and provide
for such sanctions and penalties as appropriate.
4.6.2 Contracts and sub-grants of amounts in excess of $150,000 requires that
the City will comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations
issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act.
4.6.3 The City will monitor procurements to avoid duplicative purchases. The City
will continue to enter into inter-entity agreements to realize cost savings for
shared goods and services when possible.
4.6.4 The City will verify and document that vendors are not suspended or
debarred from doing business with the Federal government.
4.7 Single Audit Act: The City, as a recipient of Federal funds, shall adhere to the
Federal regulations outlined in 2 CFR §200.501 as well as all Federal and State
statutes and regulations.
4.8 Closure: A project agreement end date will be established in accordance with 2
CFR §200.309. Any cost incurred after the project agreement end date are not
eligible for Federal reimbursement.
4.9 Code of Conduct: The purpose of the Code of Conduct is to ensure the efficient,
fair and professional administration of federal grant funds in compliance with 2
CFR §200.112, 2 CFR §200.318 and other applicable federal and state standards,
regulations, and laws.
Page 9 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
4 OF 10
4.9.1 The Code of Conduct applies to all elected officials, employees or agents
of the City engaged in the award or administration of contracts supported
by federal grant funds.
4.9.2 No elected official, employee or agent of the City shall participate in the
selection, award or administration of a contract supported by federal grant
funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a
conflict would arise when any of the following has a financial or other
interest in the firm selected for award:
• The City employee, elected official, or agent; or
• Any member of their immediate family; or
• Their partner; or
• An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the
above.
4.9.3 The City of Auburn’s elected officials, employees or agents shall neither
solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from
contractors, potential contractors or subcontractors.
4.9.4 To the extent permitted by federal, state or local laws or regulations,
violation of these standards may cause penalties, sanctions or other
disciplinary actions to be taken against the City’s elected officials,
employees or agents, or the contractors, potential contractors,
subcontractors or their agents. Any potential conflict of interest will be
disclosed in writing to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity
in accordance with applicable Federal awarding agency policy.
5.0 PROCEDURES
The purpose of these procedures is to ensure inter-departmental coordination in the
identification of grant opportunities, to ensure consistency in the management of grants
the City receives, and oversight in management and compliance with the guidelines and
restrictions as required by the grantor.
5.1 Grant Application
5.1.1 Request to Apply. Prior to submitting an application for an award, the
Department pursuing the grant award shall obtain the required approval
signatures (i.e. Department Director, Mayor).
5.1.2 Legal Review. If necessary, the responsible Department will review the
grant and grant application with the City’s Legal Department to identify any
potential legal issues that the City should be aware of.
5.1.3 Submittal of Award Application. Once approval or direction is received to
pursue the award, the Department charged with the responsibility for
implementing the award will prepare the necessary application paperwork
and, if necessary, seek approval of the City Council.
5.2 Grant Award, Obligation and Management
Page 10 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
5 OF 10
5.2.1 Award Review and Acceptance. Once the award is received, the
responsible Department will accept the award only if the grantor’s terms and
conditions can be satisfactorily met by the City. Administrative and
Legislative acceptance of an award will be subject to the following
limitations:
• Department Directors may approve awards up to and including
$10,000.00.
• Mayoral approval is required for awards between $10,001.00 up
to and including $50,000.00.
• Council approval is required for awards of $50,001.00 and up.
5.3 Project Number. The responsible Department will request the Finance Department
establish a project number. The purpose of the project number is to enable the
accurate accounting of revenues and expenses related to the project. No project
can be started or executed without a project number.
5.4 Reporting. The responsible Department will serve as the single point of contact
with the grantor and will be responsible for the preparation and submittal of reports
to the grantor and for complying with the guidelines and requirements of the award.
The responsible Department will maintain a detailed project folder that will contain,
at a minimum, all official correspondence concerning the award including City
memoranda, resolutions or ordinances; award letter; grantor guidelines and
restrictions; written communications between the City and the grantor including
copies of emails and any other documents necessary for the effective
management of the award.
5.4.1 The Finance Department will be the responsible department in preparing
the necessary financial information for reimbursements and any reports that
are necessary for reimbursements.
5.5 Matches – City budget identified. Some awards prescribe a matching requirement
in which the City must provide a financial match to qualify for the award. In the
event of a required match, the responsible Department will work with the Finance
Department to ensure sufficient budget is identified, and if necessary, to request a
budget amendment.
5.6 Award Compliance - Issues. Periodically, compliance issues associated with
award guidelines and conditions may occur. The Department charged with
administering the award will be responsible for keeping the Mayor and Finance
Department informed of any award compliance issues and resolution undertaken
to address the issue. Resolution will be documented in the City’s grant award files.
5.7 Loans. Loans represent a strategic means for the City to leverage its limited cash
resources to fund programs and projects. However, as a loan represents a liability
that must be repaid by the City, the responsible Department will coordinate with
the Finance Department to ensure sufficient resources are available to repay the
loan. If necessary, a budget amendment will be prepared to appropriate resources
to repay the loan.
Page 11 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
6 OF 10
6.0. Process Flow Chart
Figure 6.1 generally describes the process under which awards will be tracked.
Page 12 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
7 OF 10
Figure 6.1: Process Flow Diagram
Department
Finance
Grant
application
prepared and
submitted
Department seeks
approval from
Mayor to apply for
grant
Grant awarded;
Review grant
special
conditions and
restrictions .
Develop
strategy, if
needed, to
ensure
compliance with
grant
requirements
Project set up
sent to Finance
Project setup
completed by
Finance
Department identifies grant
opportunity; grant funding
source, restrictions
Grant opportunity discussed
and coordinated with Finance
Project Team formed; Staff
Lead identified ; Team roles
and responsibilities
identified
Council approval
of grant award Staff Lead to review all
contracts and
documents for internal
and project QA/QC
Page 13 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
8 OF 10
Figure 6.1: Process Flow Diagram (continued)
Department
Finance
Project
construction
begins (if
applicable)
Project revenues and expenses
tracked; Financial compliance
with grant requirements
evaluated; Issues identified
and coordinated for
resolution; reports prepared and coordinated with Finance
for granting agency
reimbursement
Project
construction
completed (if
applicable)
Council
acceptance of
completed
project
Project
closed
Grant reporting and financial
compliance issues tracked;
resolution status tracked and
reported to management
Staff Lead ensures adequate paper trail including
maintaining journal/log of
grant activites and communications
Financial reports
prepared and
Submitted for
agency
reimbursement
(Prepared and submitted by
Finance and
Departments) Track financial activity
and coordinated with
Department for resolution
Project Design begins
(if applicable)
Project scope of
work reviewed
to ensure consistency
with original plan
and assumptions
Prepare final project paperwork
and grant reports;
Final meeting by Staff Lead and
Project Team to discuss
outstanding reporting issues and resolution thereto and to generally
debrief on project and lessons
learned
Staff Lead to document findings
and actions taken as
appropriate
Page 14 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
9 OF 10
7.0. Glossary
The following is a summary of key references and terms used in this policy.
References
Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200). Developed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), this guidance establishes uniform administrative
requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. The
requirements aim to reduce the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse of federal funds and places
heavy emphasis on written policies and procedures. The focus of these policies and
procedures should be to ensure that those in the organization who carry out the objectives
of the award understand:
• The federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award
• How to evaluate and properly monitor compliance
• The steps to take if non-compliance is identified
For further information, refer to:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2017-title2-vol1/pdf/CFR-2017-title2-vol1-
part200.pdf
Specific state and local regulations may also apply. These regulations can vary based
upon the unique conditions and circumstances of each grant award. City staff should
take due care in determining the specific state and local applicable regulations that apply
to their respective project and to appropriately document, understand, and comply with
the conditions and restrictions within these regulations.
Terms
Award – An award refers to financial resources provided to the City in the form of a loan,
grant or contract from a federal, state, regional or local government or private for-profit or
non-profit entity.
Award Compliance – This term refers to the general and specific requirements and
provisions that must be satisfactorily met by the City and demonstrated to the awarding
agency. Fulfilling the award requirements as provided by the awarding agency is
important as variances thereto can become subject to an audit finding.
Department – This term refers to any, singular or in combination, of the City’s operating
Departments.
Page 15 of 244
ADMINISTRATIVE
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
TITLE:
GRANT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
INDEX NO:
100-25
PAGE
10 OF 10
Finance Department – This term refers to the City’s Finance Department.
General and Specific Audit Requirements – General audit requirements refers to federal,
state and local audit compliance requirements. Specific audit requirements typically are
specific to individual awards and can vary in complexity based upon the awarding agency.
The responsible department should take due care to carefully review and comply with the
general and specific requirements of the award in question.
Program or Project – This term refers to the City operating program or capital facilities
project that is supported by the award.
Responsible Department – This term refers to the City operating department that is
designated as the lead City department responsible for managing the program or project
funded by the award.
Page 16 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda S ubjec t:
Resolution No. 5326 (30 Minutes ) (Co leman)
Date:
Novemb er 7, 2017
Department: Attachments:
Res olution No. 5326
AVHS Addendum
Budget Imp act:
Adminis trative R ecommend ation:
Disc ussio n o nly.
Background S ummary:
The City of Aub urn entered into an agreement with Aub urn Valley Humane S o ciety (AVHS ) to operate
an animal s helter and related s ervic es beginning January 1, 2012. The agreement runs through Decemb er
31, 2019. T he City currently ad ministers the animal lic ensing and would like to have AVHS p ro vide
tho s e servic es through the remaining term of their c o ntract. Attached is a res o lutio n to authorize the
Mayor to exec ute an amendment to the c ontrac t. T he amendment to the c ontrac t is no ted as Exhib it A
to the reso lutio n.
Reviewed by C o uncil Committees:
Counc ilmember:S taff:C o leman
Meeting Date:No vember 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 17 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5326
November 6, 2017
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5326
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO
THE AGREEMENT WITH THE AUBURN VALLEY
HUMANE SOCIETY TO PROVIDE ANIMAL
LICENSING SERVICES.
WHEREAS, the City has contracted for Animal Control Authority in the
operation of an animal shelter and related services with the Auburn Valley
Humane Society; and
WHEREAS, each appreciates that contracting for such services provides
a number of mutually beneficial advantages; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide further advantages for each of the parties
they agree that the Agreement referred above should be amended to include an
addendum for animal licensing services;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an
addendum to the Agreement between the City and the Auburn Valley Humane
Society to include animal licensing services. The addendum to the Agreement
shall be in substantial conformity with the addendum attached hereto as Exhibit A
and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this
legislation.
Page 18 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5326
November 6, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2017.
CITY OF AUBURN
________________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Page 19 of 244
Exhibit A
Page 20 of 244
Page 1
ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE AUBURN VALLEY HUMANE
SOCIETY RELATING TO ANIMAL LICENSING SERVICES
THIS ADDENDUM is made and entered into this day of ,
20____, by and between the CITY OF AUBURN, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington (hereinafter referred to as the “City”), and the AUBURN VALLEY HUMANE
SOCIETY, a Washington nonprofit corporation, whose address is 4910 A Street SE, Auburn,
Washington (hereinafter referred to as the “AVHS”), as an Addendum to the Agreement
(hereinafter referred to as the “Addendum”) between the parties for Animal Control Authority in
the operation of an animal shelter executed on the 1st day of January, 2012.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have heretofore contracted for Animal Control Authority
in the operation of an animal shelter and related services and each appreciates that contracting
for such services provides a number of mutually beneficial advantages, and in order to provide
further advantages for each of the parties, they agree that the Agreement referred to above should
be amended as provided hereinbelow.
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of their mutual covenants, conditions and promises,
the PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE as follows:
ITEM ONE REVISION TO Section II. Term of Addendum: That Section of the
Agreement is amended to read as follows:
Add the following language: The initial term of the Addendum regarding Animal Licensing
Services (in addition to the Animal Control Services specified in the original agreement) shall
commence on the ________ after the date of execution and shall expire on the 31st day of
December, 2019. If AVHS is not in default of this Addendum, AVHS shall have the right to
seven (7) twelve month renewal options with. For each subsequent year of this Addendum, the
Page 21 of 244
Page 2
minimum annual amount for the annual fixed payment shall increase by an amount equal to the
previous year’s annual Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton CPI-W (August to August) with a minimum
increase of three percent (3%). Extensions may be exercised based on the mutual written
agreement of both AVHS and City with no less than 90 days’ notice of intent to renew by
AVHS.
ITEM TWO REVISION TO Section III AVHS Fees: That Section of the Agreement is
amended to read as follows:
In return for services (in addition to the Animal Control Services specified in the original
agreement) provided by AVHS, as described in the Addendum, the City shall pay to AVHS
$140,250.00 (One Hundred Forty Thousand Two Hundred Fifty) annually as a fixed payment
and a onetime $7,500.00 (Seven Thousand Five Hundred) cost for set up which will not be
reoccurring in future years. An additional Payment for variable costs in the amount of $5.55 per
license issued will also be made. AVHS will provide reports showing the number of licenses
issued. Payments shall be made quarterly with the first payment scheduled to begin on January
1, 2018.
ITEM THREE REVISION TO Section IV. A, Operations and Service: That
Section of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
Amend item 4 to include new paragraph: AVHS will make available to the City, for
inspection or audit, all work related records and documents associated with Animal Licensing
Services during normal business hours.
Add new paragraph 17: AVHS will provide animal licensing services for the City of Auburn
as listed in Exhibit A – Scope of Services.
Add new paragraph 18: AVHS will begin processing licenses ____ days after the date the
contract commencement date.
Page 22 of 244
Page 3
a. AVHS will obtain historical license data files (Data) within ___ days after the
contract is executed and enter the Data into their proprietary database.
Add new paragraph 19: AVHS will increase license sales at an average of 18% (Eighteen)
year over year during the initial term of this addendum or a total of 36% for two years.
Add new paragraph 19: AVHS agrees that it will not use personal data collected on behalf of
City for any purposes other than for performance of the services and other purposes under this
Addendum without the express written consent of City, except as provided in the Addendum or
applicable laws. AVHS specifically agrees that it will not intentionally sell, transfer, or release
personal data it has collected in fulfilling the terms of this Addendum to any third party. AVHS
agrees that any intentional sales, transfer or release of animal licensing data represents an event
of default and City has the right to terminate this Addendum.
In the event that this Addendum is terminated in accordance with Section XI. G, Termination of
Licensing Services, AVHS agrees to return and/or transfer all animal licensing Data to City
within ten (10) days after receiving payment in full at the completion of the final term of this
Addendum. AVHS will provide licensing Data to City in a readily importable format.
AVHS agree that records it acquires or creates as a result of this Addendum are subject to
Washington State’s Public Records Act (PRA), Chapter 42.56 of the Revised Code of
Washington. AVHS will not release any records, but will instead refer any person requesting
Data related to this Addendum to the Auburn City Clerk’s Office. AVHS will respond to any
request from the City within 2 working days. If AVHS believes that any records in its
possession are exempt from disclosure under the PRA, it must notify the City Clerk of the basis
for the exemption. If the exemption is based on trade secrets or proprietary information AVHS
agrees to defend and indemnify and hold the City harmless from all costs, including fines and
attorney’s fees, that the City may incur based on asserting those exemptions.
ITEM FOUR Revision to Section XI Termination: That section of the agreement is
amended to read as follows:
Page 23 of 244
Page 4
Add new language to paragraph G:
a. Termination of Animal Licensing Services for cause: City may, at its option and
without prejudice to any other remedy it may be entitled by law or in equity, or in equity,
or elsewhere under this agreement, terminate further work under this Addendum due to a
material default by AVHS in the performance of the services under this Addendum, but if
and only if AVHS fails to cure the default within 30 days after being given written notice
of such default by City.
b. Termination for convenience. City may terminate this Addendum without cause upon
ninety (90) days written notice to AVHS. AVHS may also terminate the Addendum
without cause upon ninety (90) days written notice to the City.
c. In the event of termination, AVHS will be paid for those services through the date this
Addendum expires or as of the effective date of the termination. AVHS will be
reimbursed for any supplies ordered before the date of the notice of termination.
d. In the event this Addendum is terminated in accordance with Termination: Section XI.G
(a) or (b), AVHS agrees to return and/or transfer all animal licensing data to City within
ten (10) days after receiving payment in full at the completion of the final term of this
Addendum. AVHS will provide licensing data to the City in a readily-importable format.
ITEM FIVE REMAINING TERMS UNCHANGED: That all other provisions of the
Agreement between the parties for Animal Control Authority in the operation of an animal
shelter and related services executed on the 1st day of January, 2012, shall remain unchanged,
and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.
(OTHER PARTY) CITY OF AUBURN
By: By: ________________________________
Its: Nancy Backus, Mayor
Page 24 of 244
Page 5
Attest: Attest:
By: By: ________________________________
Its: Danielle E. Daskam, Auburn City Clerk
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
____________________________________
Attorney for (Other Party) Daniel B. Heid, Auburn City Attorney
Page 25 of 244
Page 6
Exhibit 1-Scope of Services
1. Manage the daily operations of animal licensing including the processing of licensing mail from pet
owners, processing license sales reports, entering licensing data, providing customer service and depositing
licensing revenue.
2. Provide authorized registrars (City, veterinarian’s, humane society’s, for example) with reasonable
quantities of supplies necessary to sell license tags. License tag supplies are to be printed in one color with
the design and layout to be determined by AVHS
3. AVHS is responsible for ordering license tags to AVHS’s specifications. The cost to purchase tags and to
ship tags to AVHS and authorized registrar’s will be paid directly by AVHS.
4. AVHS is responsible to work with current licensing vendor to obtain license information (Data) and enter
data into their database.
5. Enter all new and renewal licenses into AVHS’s proprietary database.
6. Process and mail license tags within ten business days after receipt of the licensing payment.
7. Issue replacement tags to residents whose tags have been lost, stolen or damaged.
8. Mail renewal and reminder notices to pet owners who have a prior license. Mailing timelines to be
mutually agreed upon.
9. Track and report monthly sales from authorized registrar’s participating in the animal licensing program
and keep records of all registrar’s tag inventories and provide this information on the monthly report to the
City. AVHS will communicate directly with registrar’s as requested by the City.
10. Provide a monthly report, by the 10th business day of the subsequent month, of all animals licensed during
the month. Format of the report is to be mutually agreed upon but should include a summary of the types
and number of licenses issued, receipts for each type of license and detail of each license number issued
and the amount receipts for each license.
11. Provide statistical reports as requested within a timely manner. Depending on the type of information
requested, AVHS can provide most reports within five business days.
12. Provide access to licensing data online to appropriate personnel via AVHS’s proprietary website, Pet Point,
at no additional charge.
13. Respond to and communicate with animal control officer inquiries or animal owners requests in timely
manner, usually 48 hours.
14. Communicate with residents by phone, mail or email as needed.
15. Comply with Auburn City Code governing animal licensing.
16. Deposit all animal license receipts collected for pet licenses into the City’s bank account. AVHS shall
deposit receipts no less than once per week on the same business day each week. All transaction
information related to the deposit, via a cash receipts report, shall be provided to the City, along with the
deposit slip, within 24 hours after the deposit. For example, a Monday deposit will include all transactions
from the previous week, Sunday through Saturday. All credit card receipts will be directed to the City’s
Page 26 of 244
Page 7
bank account and the City will be responsible for transaction fees associated with credit card receipts. For
each day there are credit card transactions, AVHS will provide the detail of the transaction(s) to the City
within 24 hours. The City will supply AVHS with deposit slips and bags.
17. AVHS will be responsible for ensuring all transactions via credit card meet PCI (Payment Card Industry)
and DSS (Data Security Standards) requirements.
18. AVHS will provide to the city within one business day of deposit the deposit slip, detailed cash receipt
reports from their POS system showing daily by payment type (cash/checks/CC), credit card batch
settlement tape, and a cover sheet showing the reconciliation of deposit to their POS system generated
reports.
19. AVHS will be responsible to set up a separate merchant account with BlueFin to be used solely for credit
card transactions for Pet Licensing. The merchant account will be associated with/linked to the City’s
bank account. The city will have the ability to log into the account online to research any issues and print
monthly credit card statement.
20. AVHS will respond within one business day to questions by the city with regards to any discrepancies
between deposit slip, supporting reports, and banking/CC information. AVHS will be responsible to assist
the city with any reconciliation issues.
21. For any bank returned checks that were deposited by AVHS related to the licensing revenue the city will
provide to AVHS a copy of returned items. It is the responsibility of AVHS to contact the customer and
attempt to rectify the returned item. At the time the check is returned from the bank to the City the City
Pet License Revenue account will be charged the amount of the returned check.
22. For other locations AVHS sets up for Pet Licensing stations, the licensing revenue will be receipted in by
AVHS and be part of the AVHS deposit to the city’s bank account. Receipts made at a City Pet Licensing
location will be processed through the City cash receipting system and be charged to the animal licensing
revenue account. The City will provide to AVHS the Animal Licensing Application.
23. AVHS will provide to the City, by September 30th of each year, the marketing plan and estimated cost for
the subsequent year. (Marketing is any media or other special event. It will not include outreach efforts by
AVHS staff to coordinate licensing with other similar agencies or amnesty programs. These are considered
part of the Animal Licensing Services performed by AVHS.) The City, along with AVHS, will approve the
plan and budget for the estimated cost. AVHS will deploy the marketing plan and administer all contracts
associated with the marketing plan.
Page 27 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6664 - Property Tax Levy (15 Minutes)
(Coleman)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6664
Memo
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6664, establishing the Property Tax levy
f or calendar year 2018
Background Summary:
Proposed Ordinance No. 6664 establishes the 2018 Property Tax Levy based upon
preliminary information from King County. It represents an increase over the 2017 levy of
$209,894 plus the increase due to new construction and refund levy. King County will not
f inalize the City’s assessed valuation (AV), new construction, and ref und levies until
December. Theref ore, the levy is based upon preliminary information as it is scheduled for
Council adoption on November 20, 2017. The f ollowing table summarizes the 2018 Property
Tax levy:
T able 1. 2018 Property T ax Levy Calculations
2017 property tax levy $ 20,989,379
1.000% increase 209,894
Estimated new construction 329,502
Estimated ref und levy 19,654
Total Estimated property tax levy $ 21,548,429
As of this date the County has preliminarily established the 2018 assessed valuation
(including estimated new construction) for the City of Auburn at $10.551 billion which is a
10.4% increase over the 2017 level of $9.555 billion. The total 2018 Property Tax Levy will
be distributed to the General Fund to support general governmental operations.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 28 of 244
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6664
November 8, 2017
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 6 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE LEVY FOR
REGULAR PROPERTY TAXES BY THE CITY OF AUBURN
FOR COLLECTION IN 2018 FOR GENERAL CITY
OPERATIONAL PURPOSES IN THE AMOUNT OF
$21,548,429.00
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn has met and considered
its budget for the calendar year 2018; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 the City Council held public
hearings on November 20, 2017 and December 4, 2017, after proper notice was
given, to consider the City of Auburn’s 2018 budget and the regular property tax
levy to support it; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn, after public hearing,
and after duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, has
determined that the City of Auburn requires property tax revenue and any
increase of new construction and improvements to property, any increase in the
value of state-assessed property, annexations, and any refund levies in order to
discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best
interest; and
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Regular property taxes for collection in the City of Auburn
for the year 2018 are authorized in the amount of $21,548,163.00. Not including
Page 29 of 244
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6664
November 8, 2017
Page 2 of 3
the addition of new construction and improvements to property, any increases
related to the value of state assessed property, and any refund levies available,
the regular property tax levy for 2018 collection represents an increase from
regular property taxes levied for collection in 2017 of $209,894 which is a 1.0%
increase in revenue from the previous year.
Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality
of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, as it being hereby expressly declared
that this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
hereof would have been prepared, proposed, adopted and approved and ratified
irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directives of this legislation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law.
Page 30 of 244
----------------------------
Ordinance No. 6664
November 8, 2017
Page 3 of 3
INTRODUCED: __________________
PASSED: ______________________
APPROVED:____________________
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: ________________
Page 31 of 244
Interoffice Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director
CC: Nancy Backus, Mayor
Date: November 7, 2017
Re: 2018 Property Tax Ordinance No. 6664
Attached is proposed Ordinance No. 6664, establishing the 2018 Property Tax Levy. The 2018 Property Tax
Levy is based upon preliminary information from King County as of November 7, 2017, and represents an
increase over the 2017 levy of $209,894, not including new construction and the refund levy.
The estimated increase on new construction is $329,502 and the refund levy is $19,654. King County will
not finalize the City’s assessed valuation (AV) and new construction until December therefore the levy will be
based upon preliminary information as it is scheduled for Council adoption on November 27, 2017. The
following table summarizes the 2018 Property Tax levy:
Table 1. 2018 Property Tax Levy Calculations
2017 property tax levy $ 20,989,379
1.000% increase 209,894
Estimated new construction 329,502
Refund levy 19,654
Estimated Property Tax Levy $ 21,548,429
As of this date the County has preliminarily established the 2018 assessed valuation (including estimated
new construction) for the City of Auburn at $10,551,422,027 which is a 10.4% increase over the 2017 level of
$9,555,039,113.
The total 2018 Property Tax Levy will be distributed to the General Fund to support general governmental
operations.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 6664
Page 32 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Budget Amendment #4 (Mid-Biennium Correction) (20 Minutes)
(Coleman)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Memo
Scheudle A
Schedule B
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Discussion Only
Background Summary:
Budget Amendment #4 represents the f ourth budget amendment for the 2017-2018
biennium and the first budget amendment for 2018. For details, see the attached transmittal
memorandum and supporting materials.
Changes f rom the proposed budget amendment reviewed by Council at the September 25
study session are highlighted in red in the attached memo, and include:
Increased costs associated with the Central Parking Garage; and
Restoration of funding for projects f or which REET funding was diverted to Street
Preservation projects.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 33 of 244
Interoffice Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director
CC: Nancy Backus, Mayor
Date: November 8, 2017
Re: Ordinance #6666 – 2017-2018 Budget Amendment #4
The City’s biennial 2017-2018 budget was approved by Council as two one-year appropriations. Budget
Amendments #1 and #2 amended the budget for calendar year 2017. Budget Amendment #3, which will also
amend the 2017 budget, will be brought to Council for consideration later this year.
This amendment will be the fourth budget amendment for the biennium and the first budget amendment for
calendar year 2018. The purpose of this amendment is to 1) amend the 2018 budget for changes that
occurred in 2017 for which there is an ongoing fiscal impact; 2) to carry forward capital project budgets that
are not anticipated to be completed in 2017 and adjust other project budgets to match the 2018-2023 Capital
Facilities Plan (CFP); 3) to establish budget spending authority for new programs and other expected
changes in 2018; and 4) to allocate REET funds to three new street projects. Proposed amendments to the
2018 budget are as follows:
Adjustments of 2018 beginning fund balance due to 2017 budget amendments. Each approved
budget amendment in 2017 (in BAs #1 and #2) that amended the 2017 budgeted ending fund balance also
affects the budgeted 2018 beginning fund balance. These adjustments, which affect most funds, increase
2018 budgeted fund balance by $21,136,521.
Continuation of previously approved requests by Council. Items in this category were previously
approved by Council in 2017 and are ongoing items that need to be included in the 2018 budget. In
total, these items reduce budgeted 2018 ending fund balance by $465,400, and include:
• Revenue adjustments that are expected to continue in 2018 (such as property and utility taxes);
• Ongoing costs associated with the new Administrative Assistant FTE added in BA#2; and
• Corrections for unbudgeted items, not included in the adopted 2018 budget.
New funding requests. This category includes project adjustments as well as new funding requests
and other adjustments. In aggregate, these items increase budgeted 2018 ending fund balance by
$2,612,400.
Project adjustments include requested project expenses that were previously approved in 2017 but will
require carry forward to 2018, as well as other changes to project budgets to align with the 2018-2023
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) that is scheduled to be adopted in December. Please refer to Attachment
1 for project revenue and expense budget changes in the Arterial Street Fund (#102), Local Street
Fund (#103), Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105), Mitigation Fees Fund (#124), Parks
Page 34 of 244
Construction Fund (#321), Capital Improvements Fund (#328), Local Revitalization Fund (#330), Water
Utility Capital Fund (#460), Sewer Utility Capital Fund (#461), Storm Drainage Utility Capital Fund
(#462), Facilities Fund (#505), and the Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560).
This budget amendment also restores REET funding, which had been diverted to street
projects, to the Tenth Green and Surrounds Rebuild project and Public Art program.
Other requests include revenue adjustments to reflect new revenue sources and increases in existing
revenue streams; requests to add new staffing; requests for increased funding for existing programs,
and funding requests for new projects or programs.
This budget amendment adds budget for the Auburn central parking garage and includes
painting the exterior and ramp work.
In this budget amendment, three new positions are being requested:
• Economic Development Coordinator, Administration Department (1.0 FTE, $121,400):
Funding is requested to hire an Economic Development Coordinator to provide capacity to
implement the strategies identified in the 10-Year Economic Development Strategic Plan.
• Maintenance Worker I-CDL, Storm Utility Fund (2.0 FTEs; $173,500): Funding is requested to
hire two additional maintenance workers to focus on inspection, cleaning, and repair of the
storm drainage system based on the requirements of the Department of Ecology’s National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
Funding for street preservation projects. Based on the recommendation of the ad hoc committee
on $20 car tab fees, this amendment would reduce 2018 ending fund balance by $2,212,400 by:
• Reallocating REET funds within the Capital Improvements Fund (Fund 328) by deferring
certain projects (see Attachment 2), plus adding a one-time transfer of $1,300,000 from the
Cumulative Reserve Fund.
• Funding three streets projects from those funds:
o West Valley Highway Paving $ 350,000
o Arterial Street Preservation Program $ 1,200,000
o S. 277th Street Pavement Preservation $ 662,400
o Balance to Fund 328 for future projects $ 679,100
The following table summarizes the current and revised budget as a result of this amendment.
Table 1: 2017 Budget as Amended
2018 Adopted Budget $ 266,871,607
Budget Amendment #4 (Ord #6666) 26,133,821
2018 Budget as Amended $ 293,005,428
Attachments:
1. Summary of CIP changes per 2018-2023 CFP.
2. Recommended reallocation of REET funds and transfer from cumulative reserves for street
preservation projects, per the ad hoc committee on $20 car tab fees.
Page 35 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
General Fund (#001)
2018 Adopted Budget 12,623,309 66,091,810 72,860,044 5,855,075
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):2,512,021 897,200 1,938,200 1,471,021
General Fund Revenues:
Incr property tax revenues to reflect use of banked capacity (from BA#1)- 500,000 - 500,000
Revenue from City Traffic School (from BA#2)- 40,000 - 40,000
Adjust budget for expected utility taxes (from BA#2)- 170,900 - 170,900
Mayor's Office / Administration:
New FTE: Administrative Assistant (from BA#2)- - 93,200 (93,200)
Funding for homeless resources and sheltering - - 337,400 (337,400)
Web-based business licensing database system (with partial grant funding)- 65,000 122,500 (57,500)
New FTE: Economic Development Coordinator - - 121,400 (121,400)
Finance Department:
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 85,100 (85,100)
Police Department:
Incr pension budget for Records Division (underbudgeted) (from BA#1)- - 46,800 (46,800)
Add budget for holidays worked (previously unbudgeted) (from BA#1)- - 300,000 (300,000)
Add budget for comp time and other cashouts (from BA#1)- - 400,000 (400,000)
Transfer appropriation for Police vehicles in POL.0023 to Fund 560 (T/F to F560)- - - -
001.21.521.200.64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (130,300)
001.98.597.100.55 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 130,300
Accept reimb from CJTC / add supernumerary position (from BA#1)- 121,300 118,600 2,700
Automatic vehicle location for Police vehicles - - 22,500 (22,500)
Human Resources Department:
Increase budget for King County District Court costs - - 135,000 (135,000)
Streets Department:
Restore funding for position #4270-001, not included in 2018 budget - - 68,100 (68,100)
Non-Departmental:
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 2,512,021 - - 2,512,021
Increase budget for Central Parking Garage O&M expenses - - 87,600 (87,600)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 001 15,135,330 66,989,010 74,798,244 7,326,096
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Page 1 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 36 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Arterial Street Fund (#102)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,376,814 6,215,417 6,643,292 948,939
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):425,575 (4,353,700) (4,089,800) 161,675
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 80,675 - - 80,675
Add'l funding for transit partnership services related to increased Sounder service - - 140,000 (140,000)
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 344,900 (4,423,700) (4,299,800) 221,000
Rebudget funding for Kersey Way study (asbd11) (Transfer In from F124)- 20,000 20,000 -
Rebudget funding for A St SE/Lakeland Hills Way Intersection proj (T/F frm F124)- 50,000 50,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 102 1,802,389 1,861,717 2,553,492 1,110,614
Local Street Fund (#103)
2018 Adopted Budget 893,143 1,909,100 2,418,270 383,973
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):459,491 - 150,000 309,491
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 309,491 - - 309,491
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 150,000 - 150,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 103 1,352,634 1,909,100 2,568,270 693,464
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund (#104)
2018 Adopted Budget 84,044 113,700 113,700 84,044
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):96,102 - - 96,102
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 96,102 - - 96,102
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 104 180,146 113,700 113,700 180,146
Page 2 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 37 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105)
2018 Adopted Budget 366,008 3,067,340 2,880,440 552,908
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,043,817 2,658,000 2,290,500 1,411,317
Funding for West Valley Highway paving project (T/F from F328)- 350,000 350,000 -
Funding for Arterial Street Preservation projects (T/F from F328)- 1,200,000 1,200,000 -
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 247,717 - - 247,717
Adjust budget for expected utility taxes (from BA#2)- 34,100 - 34,100
Funding for S. 277th St. Pavement Preservation project (T/F from F328)- 1,324,800 1,324,800 -
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 796,100 (250,900) (584,300) 1,129,500
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 105 1,409,825 5,725,340 5,170,940 1,964,225
Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117)
2018 Adopted Budget 193,981 87,100 253,221 27,860
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):95,555 - - 95,555
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 95,555 - - 95,555
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 117 289,536 87,100 253,221 123,415
Housing & Comm Develop Fund (#119)
2018 Adopted Budget 52,455 460,000 468,446 44,009
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(10,001) - - (10,001)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (10,001) - - (10,001)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 119 42,454 460,000 468,446 34,008
Recreation Trails Fund (#120)
2018 Adopted Budget 56,998 7,340 - 64,338
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):164 - - 164
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 164 - - 164
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 120 57,162 7,340 - 64,502
Page 3 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 38 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
BIA Fund (#121)
2018 Adopted Budget 48,716 55,200 55,000 48,916
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):9,956 - - 9,956
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 9,956 - - 9,956
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 121 58,672 55,200 55,000 58,872
Cumulative Reserve Fund (#122)
2018 Adopted Budget 7,366,699 20,500 250,000 7,137,199
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):2,121,600 - 1,300,000 821,600
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 2,121,600 - - 2,121,600
Transfer reserves to Fund 328 for street preservation projects - - 1,300,000 (1,300,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 122 9,488,299 20,500 1,550,000 7,958,799
Mitigation Fees Fund (#124)
2018 Adopted Budget 4,429,481 1,520,200 1,219,817 4,729,864
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):4,823,782 - 160,600 4,663,182
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 4,597,182 - - 4,597,182
Trail and other improvements to West Auburn Lake Property (Transfer to F321)- - 100,000 (100,000)
Adjustments of transfers for capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 226,600 - (9,400) 236,000
Rebudget funding for Kersey Way study (asbd11) (Transfer to F102)- - 20,000 (20,000)
Rebudget funding for A St SE/Lakeland Hills Way Intersection proj (T/F to F102)- - 50,000 (50,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 124 9,253,263 1,520,200 1,380,417 9,393,046
LID Guarantee Fund (#249)
2018 Adopted Budget - - - -
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,588 - - 1,588
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 1,588 - - 1,588
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 249 1,588 - - 1,588
Page 4 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 39 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
LID 350 Fund (#275)
2018 Adopted Budget 11,959 7,812 7,246 12,525
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(1,349) - - (1,349)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (1,349) - - (1,349)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 275 10,610 7,812 7,246 11,176
Parks Construction Fund (#321)
2018 Adopted Budget 282,116 664,590 872,000 74,706
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):550,460 750,000 816,400 484,060
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 484,060 - - 484,060
Trail and other improvements to West Auburn Lake Property (Transfer from F124)- 100,000 100,000 -
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 66,400 623,000 689,400 -
Restore Tenth Green and Surrounds Rebuild project with unobligated REET funds - 27,000 27,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 321 832,576 1,414,590 1,688,400 558,766
Capital Improvements Fund (#328)
2018 Adopted Budget 7,797,299 3,869,857 4,015,148 7,652,008
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):985,286 1,101,600 1,584,000 502,886
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 690,286 - - 690,286
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 210,000 (398,400) (970,400) 782,000
Transfer from Cumulative Reserve Fund for street preservation projects - 1,300,000 - 1,300,000
Web based HVAC upgrade for Council chambers (Transfer from F505)- 200,000 200,000 -
Restore Tenth Green and Surrounds Rebuild project with unobligated REET funds - - 27,000 (27,000)
Restore Public Art project with unobligated REET funds 85,000 - 115,000 (30,000)
Funding for West Valley Highway paving project (Transfer to F105)- - 350,000 (350,000)
Funding for Arterial Street Preservation program projects (Transfer to F105)- - 1,200,000 (1,200,000)
Funding for S. 277th St. Pavement Preservation project (Transfer to F105)- - 662,400 (662,400)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 328 8,782,585 4,971,457 5,599,148 8,154,894
Page 5 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 40 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Local Revitalization Fund (#330)
2018 Adopted Budget - - - -
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):41,100 - 40,500 600
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 600 - - 600
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 40,500 - 40,500 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 330 41,100 - 40,500 600
Water Fund (#430)
2018 Adopted Budget 4,675,993 15,432,455 15,464,336 4,644,112
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,454,806 - 135,800 1,319,006
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 1,417,306 - - 1,417,306
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 4,000 (4,000)
Adjust budget for expected utility taxes (from BA#2)- - 95,000 (95,000)
Increase budget for Central Parking Garage O&M expenses - - 11,800 (11,800)
Adjust operating transfers to F560 for capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 430 6,130,799 15,432,455 15,600,136 5,963,118
Sewer Fund (#431)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,234,710 8,237,670 7,793,219 1,679,161
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):893,757 - 101,300 792,457
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 856,257 - - 856,257
###Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 3,000 (3,000)
Adjust budget for expected utility taxes (from BA#2)- - 65,000 (65,000)
Adjust operating transfers to F560 for capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
Increase budget for Central Parking Garage O&M expenses - - 8,300 (8,300)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 431 2,128,467 8,237,670 7,894,519 2,471,618
Page 6 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 41 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Storm Drainage Fund (#432)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,776,980 9,320,902 9,561,770 1,536,112
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(221,507) - 257,200 (478,707)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (259,007) - - (259,007)
Increase budget for Central Parking Garage O&M expenses - - 10,700 (10,700)
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 3,000 (3,000)
Adjust operating transfers to F560 for capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
NEW FTEs: two Maintenance Worker I positions - - 173,500 (173,500)
Adjust budget for expected utility taxes (from BA#2)- - 45,000 (45,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 432 1,555,473 9,320,902 9,818,970 1,057,405
Sewer Metro Sub Fund (#433)
2018 Adopted Budget 2,318,495 18,190,923 18,250,200 2,259,218
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):297,317 - - 297,317
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 297,317 - - 297,317
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 433 2,615,812 18,190,923 18,250,200 2,556,535
Solid Waste Fund (#434)
2018 Adopted Budget 4,233,901 16,065,850 15,691,927 4,607,824
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):493,334 (1,012,900) (751,700) 232,134
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 493,334 - - 493,334
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 1,000 (1,000)
Adjust budget to reflect extension of solid waste contract with Republic Services - (1,012,900) (752,700) (260,200)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 434 4,727,235 15,052,950 14,940,227 4,839,958
Page 7 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 42 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Airport Fund (#435)
2018 Adopted Budget 324,165 829,800 693,975 459,990
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):26,635 19,000 90,100 (44,465)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 26,635 - - 26,635
Add budget to repay interfund loan (from BA#1)- - 40,100 (40,100)
Increase revenues for change in security charge (from BA#2)- 19,000 - 19,000
Competitive Market Assessment / Long-Term Rate Study for the Auburn Airport - - 50,000 (50,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 435 350,800 848,800 784,075 415,525
Cemetery Fund (#436)
2018 Adopted Budget 243,909 1,183,800 1,197,391 230,318
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):16,243 - 1,000 15,243
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 16,243 - - 16,243
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 1,000 (1,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 436 260,152 1,183,800 1,198,391 245,561
Water Capital Fund (#460)
2018 Adopted Budget 946,053 5,000,000 5,086,586 859,467
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(304,998) 287,500 (777,400) 759,902
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (857,498) - - (857,498)
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 552,500 287,500 (777,400) 1,617,400
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 460 641,055 5,287,500 4,309,186 1,619,369
Page 8 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 43 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Sewer Capital Fund (#461)
2018 Adopted Budget 7,821,219 600,000 1,414,000 7,007,219
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):3,881,858 - 257,000 3,624,858
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 3,531,858 - - 3,531,858
Incr budget for Pump Station Telemetry Imprvmnts from 2017 savings in other proj 140,000 - 140,000 -
New: Pump Station Electrical Improvements funded from savings in other project - - - -
New Project 461.00.590.100.65 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 141,000
Sewer Pump Station Repl Proj 461.00.590.100.65 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (141,000)
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 210,000 - 117,000 93,000
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 461 11,703,077 600,000 1,671,000 10,632,077
Storm Drainage Capital Fund (#462)
2018 Adopted Budget 10,347,143 1,800,000 1,536,000 10,611,143
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,097,153 - 638,100 459,053
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 314,053 - - 314,053
Auburn Way South, 2nd to Main St. Storm Improvements (cpXXXX)- - 125,000 (125,000)
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP 783,100 - 513,100 270,000
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 462 11,444,296 1,800,000 2,174,100 11,070,196
Airport Capital Fund (#465)
2018 Adopted Budget 111,743 1,741,667 1,853,334 76
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):92,892 527,800 555,600 65,092
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 92,892 - - 92,892
Move funding for purchase of runway safety area from 2021 to 2018 - 527,800 555,600 (27,800)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 465 204,635 2,269,467 2,408,934 65,168
Page 9 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 44 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Cemetery Capital Fund (#466)
2018 Adopted Budget 157,301 - - 157,301
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):99,332 75,000 75,000 99,332
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 99,332 - - 99,332
Fund asphalt repair work at Mountain View Cemetery (Transfer from F701)- 75,000 75,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 466 256,633 75,000 75,000 256,633
Insurance Fund (#501)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,084,209 1,500 241,230 844,479
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):743,711 - - 743,711
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 743,711 - - 743,711
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 501 1,827,920 1,500 241,230 1,588,190
Workers' Comp Fund (#503)
2018 Adopted Budget 993,145 1,103,700 862,683 1,234,162
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):227,246 - - 227,246
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 227,246 - - 227,246
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 503 1,220,391 1,103,700 862,683 1,461,408
Facilities Fund (#505)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,285,575 3,875,400 3,911,293 1,249,682
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(21,903) (285,000) (85,000) (221,903)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (21,903) - - (21,903)
Adjustments to capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP - (450,000) (450,000) -
Web based HVAC upgrade for Council chambers (Transfer to F328)- - 200,000 (200,000)
Increase budget for Central Parking Garage O&M expenses - 165,000 165,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 505 1,263,672 3,590,400 3,826,293 1,027,779
Page 10 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 45 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
Innovation & Technology Fund (#518)
2018 Adopted Budget 435,128 6,598,327 6,063,932 969,523
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,103,567 362,400 135,000 1,330,967
Funding for major upgrade to the City's CRW system - - 50,000 (50,000)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 1,103,567 - - 1,103,567
Correct interfund revenue to match charges to departments/funds - 362,400 - 362,400
Migrate help desk software to service desk solution - - 80,000 (80,000)
New FTE: Administrative Assistant (from BA#2)- - 5,000 (5,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 518 1,538,695 6,960,727 6,198,932 2,300,490
Equipment Rental Fund (#550)
2018 Adopted Budget 2,483,429 3,049,383 2,829,409 2,703,403
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):440,448 - (88,800) 529,248
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 440,448 - - 440,448
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 2,100 (2,100)
Move budget for capital lease from capital to oper subfund (from BA#1)- - 41,500 (41,500)
Remove salary and benefits for deactivated M&O Support Manager position - - (132,400) 132,400
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 550 2,923,877 3,049,383 2,740,609 3,232,651
Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,376,943 1,703,631 1,506,851 1,573,723
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,066,352 230,300 188,800 1,107,852
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 1,066,352 - - 1,066,352
Move budget for capital lease from capital to oper subfund (from BA#1)- - (41,500) 41,500
Transfer appropriation for Police vehicles in POL.0023 to Fund 560 (T/F from GF)- 130,300 130,300 -
Adjust operating transfers to F560 for capital projects per 2018-2023 CFP - 100,000 100,000 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 560 2,443,295 1,933,931 1,695,651 2,681,575
Page 11 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 46 of 244
Schedule A
Summary of 2018 Budget Adjustments by Fund
Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6666)
A 24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Beg. Fund
Balance
2018
Revenues
2018
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A
ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out
IT Capital Fund (#568)
2018 Amended Budget 1,079,683 205,000 1,033,800 250,883
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):337,694 22,500 22,500 337,694
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 337,694 - - 337,694
Automatic vehicle location for Police vehicles - 22,500 22,500 -
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 568 1,417,377 227,500 1,056,300 588,577
Fire Pension Fund (#611)
2018 Adopted Budget 2,324,182 84,000 178,225 2,229,957
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(48,293) - 42,800 (91,093)
Correct budget for position #1430-002 (from BA#1)- - 1,000 (1,000)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 (48,293) - - (48,293)
Incr salary & benefits for Battalion Chief and Fire Marshall per CBA (from BA#1)- - 41,800 (41,800)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 611 2,275,889 84,000 221,025 2,138,864
Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701)
2018 Adopted Budget 1,758,279 39,900 - 1,798,179
BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):23,330 - 75,000 (51,670)
Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2017 23,330 - - 23,330
Fund asphalt repair work at Mountain View Cemetery (Transfer to F466)- - 75,000 (75,000)
Revised 2018 Budget - Fund 701 1,781,609 39,900 75,000 1,746,509
Grand Total - All Funds
2018 Adopted Budget 82,595,207 184,276,400 192,349,311 74,522,296
TOTAL BA#4 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed)24,854,121 1,279,700 5,062,700 21,071,121
Revised 2018 Budget 107,449,328 185,556,100 197,412,011 95,593,417
293,005,428 293,005,428
Page 12 of 12 11/8/2017 9:01 AMPage 47 of 244
Schedule B
2018 Appropriations by Fund
Fund
2018
Adopted
Budget
BA#4
(Ord #6666)
Total
Amendments
Revised
Budget
General Fund (#001)78,715,119 3,409,221 3,409,221 82,124,340
Arterial Street Fund (#102)7,592,231 (3,928,125) (3,928,125) 3,664,106
Local Street Fund (#103)2,802,243 459,491 459,491 3,261,734
Hotel Motel Fund (#104)197,744 96,102 96,102 293,846
Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105)3,433,348 3,701,817 3,701,817 7,135,165
Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117)281,081 95,555 95,555 376,636
Housing and Community Development Grant Fund (#119)512,455 (10,001) (10,001) 502,454
Recreation Trails Fund (#120)64,338 164 164 64,502
Business Improvement Area Fund (#121)103,916 9,956 9,956 113,872
Cumulative Reserve Fund (#122)7,387,199 2,121,600 2,121,600 9,508,799
Mitigation Fees Fund (#124)5,949,681 4,823,782 4,823,782 10,773,463
1998 Library Fund (#229)282,150 - - 282,150
2010 Annex A&B Bond Debt Fund (#230)1,675,120 - - 1,675,120
2010 C&D Local Revitalization Debt Fund (#231)589,595 - - 589,595
SCORE Debt Service Fund (#238)2,021,294 - - 2,021,294
LID Guarantee Fund (#249)- 1,588 1,588 1,588
LID #350 (#275)19,771 (1,349) (1,349) 18,422
Golf/Cemetery 2016 Refunding (#276)554,367 - - 554,367
Municipal Park Construction Fund (#321)946,706 1,300,460 1,300,460 2,247,166
Capital Improvements Fund (#328)11,667,156 2,086,886 2,086,886 13,754,042
Local Revitalization Fund (#330)- 41,100 41,100 41,100
Water Fund (#430)20,108,448 1,454,806 1,454,806 21,563,254
Sewer Fund (#431)9,472,380 893,757 893,757 10,366,137
Storm Drainage Fund (#432)11,097,882 (221,507) (221,507) 10,876,375
Sewer Metro Fund (#433)20,509,418 297,317 297,317 20,806,735
Solid Waste Fund (#434)20,299,751 (519,566) (519,566) 19,780,185
Airport Fund (#435)1,153,965 45,635 45,635 1,199,600
Cemetery Fund (#436)1,427,709 16,243 16,243 1,443,952
Water Capital Fund (#460)5,946,053 (17,498) (17,498) 5,928,555
Sewer Capital Fund (#461)8,421,219 3,881,858 3,881,858 12,303,077
Storm Drainage Capital Fund (#462)12,147,143 1,097,153 1,097,153 13,244,296
Airport Capital Fund (#465)1,853,410 620,692 620,692 2,474,102
Cemetery Capital Fund (#466)157,301 174,332 174,332 331,633
Insurance Fund (#501)1,085,709 743,711 743,711 1,829,420
Workers Compensation Self Insurance Fund (#503)2,096,845 227,246 227,246 2,324,091
Facilities Fund (#505)5,160,975 (306,903) (306,903) 4,854,072
Innovation and Technology Fund (#518)7,033,455 1,465,967 1,465,967 8,499,422
Equipment Rental Fund (#550)5,532,812 440,448 440,448 5,973,260
Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560)3,080,574 1,296,652 1,296,652 4,377,226
IT Capital Fund (#568)1,284,683 360,194 360,194 1,644,877
Fire Pension Fund (#611)2,408,182 (48,293) (48,293) 2,359,889
Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701)1,798,179 23,330 23,330 1,821,509
Total 266,871,607 26,133,821 26,133,821 293,005,428
11/8/2017 8:14 AMPage 48 of 244
Attachment 1
Summary of CIP Changes per 2018-2023 CFP
GRAND TOTAL 3,717,600$ (3,865,500)$ (3,402,800)$ 3,254,900$
Beginning Ending
Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance
102 Arterial Streets cp1502 37th St SE & A St SE Traffic Signal Safety Imp 34,400 355,600 390,000 -
cp1707 A St SE Corridor Signal Safety & Op. Imp 35,500 319,700 355,200 -
cp1110 A Street SE Safety Improvements 55,000 - 55,000 -
asbd24 Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Imp (500,000) (500,000) -
cp1114 Auburn Way S & 12th St SE Intersection Improvements 150,000 - 150,000 -
asbd05 AWN & 1st Street NE Signal Improvements - (50,000) 50,000
asbd23 AWS / SR-164 Sidewalk Improvements (208,000) (260,000) 52,000
cp1705 AWS / SR-164 Sidewalk Improvements - 52,000 (52,000)
asbd07 Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements - (100,000) 100,000
asbd14 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements (410,000) (210,000) (200,000)
cp1416 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (2,352,000) (2,502,000) 150,000
cp1701 ITS Dynamic Message Signs (120,000) (50,000) (70,000)
asbd18 Lea Hill Segment 1 - R St NE to 105th Pl SE 200,000 200,000 -
asbd12 M Street NE - E Main St to 4th St NE (300,000) (300,000) -
asbd21 M Street SE & 29th St SE Intersection Safety Imp 50,000 - 50,000 -
cp1406 Main Street Signal Upgrades 20,000 - 20,000 -
asbd26 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements (125,000) (250,000) 125,000
asbd25 Stewart Road - Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor (34,000) (100,000) 66,000
asbd20 West Valley Highway Improvements (100,000) (100,000) -
cp1513 22nd St NE & I St NE Intersection (1,175,000) (1,175,000) -
asbd11 Kersey Way Study 20,000 20,000 -
asbd15 A St SE & Lakeland Hills Wy SE Intersection Sfty & Imp 50,000 50,000 -
asbd13 West Valley Highway Improvements 25,000 25,000 -
TOTAL 344,900 (4,353,700) (4,229,800) 221,000
Adopted 1,376,814 6,215,417 6,643,292 948,939
102
103 Local Streets sobd02 Local Street Improvement Program 150,000 - 150,000 -
TOTAL 150,000 - 150,000 -
105 Arterial Street Preservation cp1521 15th St NE/NW Preservation 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 -
cp1502 37th St SE & A St SE Traffic Signal Safety Imp 46,100 - 46,100 -
spbd01 Annual Street Preservation Program - (400,000) 400,000
spbd04 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (889,700) (1,508,000) 618,300
spbd05 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (111,200) (222,400) 111,200
TOTAL 796,100 (250,900) (584,300) 1,129,500
Fund Project
Page 1 of 4 Page 49 of 244
Attachment 1
Summary of CIP Changes per 2018-2023 CFP
Beginning Ending
Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund BalanceFundProject
124 Mitigation Fees asbd24 Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Imp (100,000) 100,000
cp1315 City Wetland Mitigation projects 26,600 26,600 -
asbd14 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements (57,000) 57,000
cp1416 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (190,000) 190,000
gpbd11 Lakeland Hills Nature Area 150,000 (150,000)
asbd18 Lea Hill Segment 1 - R St NE to 105th Pl SE 200,000 (200,000)
asbd12 M Street NE - E Main St to 4th St NE (20,000) 20,000
gpbd13 Mary Olson Farm - Watts Property Acquisition 125,000 (125,000)
asbd25 Stewart Road - Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor (34,000) 34,000
gpbd06 Sunset Park 200,000 200,000 -
asbd20 West Valley Highway Improvements (100,000) 100,000
cp1513 22nd St NE & I St NE Intersection (235,000) 235,000
waulk West Auburn Lake Property 100,000 (100,000)
asbd11 Kersey Way Study 20,000 (20,000)
asbd15 A St SE & Lakeland Hills Wy SE Intersection Sfty & Imp 50,000 (50,000)
asbd13 West Valley Highway Improvements 25,000 (25,000)
TOTAL 226,600 - 160,600 66,000
Adopted 4,429,481 1,520,200 1,219,817 4,729,864
321 Parks Construction gpbd22 Les Gove Campus Security Cameras 20,000 - 20,000 -
gpbd13 Mary Olson Farm - Watts Property Acquisition 250,000 250,000 -
gpbd04 Park Acquisitions / Development 46,400 - 46,400 -
gpbd06 Sunset Park 400,000 400,000 -
gcbd05 Public Art - - - -
waulk West Auburn Lake Property 100,000 100,000 -
TOTAL 66,400 750,000 816,400 -
328 Capital Improvements cp1611 Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk - Phase 2 (800,000) (800,000) -
cp1705 AWS / SR-164 Sidewalk Improvements 210,000 375,000 670,000 (85,000)
cp1315 City Wetland Mitigation projects 26,600 26,600 -
erbd02 M&O Lunchroom Expansion - 37,500 (37,500)
gcbd05 Restore Public Art project with unobligated REET funds 85,000 - 115,000 (30,000)
10thgrn Restore 10th Green rebuild proj w/ unobligated REET funds - 27,000 (27,000)
TOTAL 295,000 (398,400) 76,100 (179,500)
Page 2 of 4 Page 50 of 244
Attachment 1
Summary of CIP Changes per 2018-2023 CFP
Beginning Ending
Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund BalanceFundProject
330 Local Revitalization cp1616 City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration 40,500 - 40,500 -
TOTAL 40,500 - 40,500 -
430 Water Operations erbd02 M&O Lunchroom Expansion 37,500 - 37,500 -
erbd03 M&O Master Planning - - (12,500) 12,500
TOTAL 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
431 Sewer Operations erbd02 M&O Lunchroom Expansion 37,500 - 37,500 -
erbd03 M&O Master Planning - - (12,500) 12,500
TOTAL 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
432 Storm Operations erbd02 M&O Lunchroom Expansion 37,500 - 37,500 -
erbd03 M&O Master Planning - - (12,500) 12,500
TOTAL 37,500 - 25,000 12,500
#####
460 Water Capital cp1513 22nd St NE & I St NE Intersection - (275,000) 275,000
wabd08 Algona Well 1 Decommissioning - (39,000) 39,000
wabd14 Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements - (50,000) 50,000
cp1218 Auburn Way S Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood 10,000 - 10,000 -
wabd07 Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitiation - (800,000) 800,000
cp1603 Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main Rpl - (183,400) 183,400
cp1416 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements - (250,000) 250,000
cp1107 Fulmer Well Field Improvements 10,000 - 10,000 -
cp1617 Lea Hill PRV Stations Improvement 10,000 - 10,000 -
wabd13 M Street NE Widening - (20,000) 20,000
cp1709 Reservoir 1 Seismic Control Valve 12,500 87,500 100,000 -
wabd04 Utilities Field Operations Center 100,000 200,000 300,000 -
cp1317 Water Meter & Billing System Improvements 400,000 - 400,000 -
cp1417 West Hill Springs Improvements 10,000 - 10,000 -
TOTAL 552,500 287,500 (777,400) 1,617,400
Adopted 946,053 5,000,000 5,086,586 859,467
Page 3 of 4 Page 51 of 244
Attachment 1
Summary of CIP Changes per 2018-2023 CFP
Beginning Ending
Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund BalanceFundProject
461 Sewer Capital cp1520 B Street NW Reconstruction 10,000 - 10,000 -
cp1416 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements - (88,000) 88,000
sebd08 M Street NE Widening - (5,000) 5,000
sebd06 Siphon Assessment 100,000 - 100,000 -
wabd04 Utilities Field Operations Center 100,000 - 100,000 -
sebd09 Pump Station Telemetry Improvements 140,000 - 140,000 -
cp1512 Pump Station Electrical Improvements - (141,000) 141,000
sebd05 Pump Station Rerplacement / Improvements - - 141,000 (141,000)
TOTAL 350,000 - 257,000 93,000
462 Storm Capital cp1312 Academy Dr, SE 312 St Se, & D St Storm Improvements 600,000 - 600,000 -
cp1316 East Ridge Manor Storm Drainage Improvements 83,100 - 83,100 -
sdbd07 Hillside Drainage Assessment - (125,000) 125,000
sdbd14 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements - (50,000) 50,000
sdbd13 S. 330th St. & 46th Pl. S. Storm Improvement - (20,000) 20,000
wabd04 Utilities Field Operations Center 100,000 - 100,000 -
sdbd12 Vegetation Sorting Facility - (75,000) 75,000
TOTAL 783,100 - 513,100 270,000
560 ER&R Capital erbd02 M&O Lunchroom Expansion 150,000 150,000 -
erbd03 M&O Master Planning (50,000) (50,000) -
TOTAL - 100,000 100,000 -
Adopted 1,376,943 1,703,631 1,506,851 1,573,723
Page 4 of 4 Page 52 of 244
Attachment 2
Funding for street preservation projects (in Fund 328) per the recommendation of
the ad hoc committee on $20 car tab fees
Source Dept Project/Program CIP 2017 2018
REET
CDPW Auburn Environmental Boardwalk - Phase 2 CP1611 75,000
Downtown Wayfinding Program GCBD03 25,000 35,000
Citywide Bridge Railing Replacements GCBD08 99,000 100,000
Citywide Street Lighting Improvements CP1711 50,000 100,000
Parks Mary Olson Farm/Watts Property Acquisition GPBD13 125,000
Public Art GCBD02 133,000 30,000
Lakeland Hills Nature Area GPBD11 25,000 150,000
Rebuild the Tenth Green and Surrounds 27,000
Facilities M&O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements CP0711 25,000
M&O Vehicle Bay Maintenance CP1223 62,500
M&O Fuel Tank Replacement ERBD01 17,500
M&O Lunchroom Expansion ERBD02 37,500
M&O Master Planning ERBD03 12,500 12,500
City Hall Exterior Structural Repairs 250,000
City Hall Roof Replacement 200,000
Fund Balance
GF Projected surplus fund balance 1,300,000
Total 1,987,000 904,500
GRAND TOTAL
Amount
$ 2,891,500
Page 53 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5319 - 2018 Fee Schedule (15 Minutes) (Heid)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
City Attorney
Attachments:
Res olution
Fee schedule
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Discussion only
Background Summary:
Consistent with the city's process of reviewing, setting, and identifying f ees associated with
city services, a review of the current f ees has been completed with the intention of identifying
the amounts of such f ees as consistent with the cost of the city (so that the f ees cover city
expenses).
Amendments of the f ee schedule have, thus, then included in the attachment to Resolution
number 5319, to be effective in 2018. Each of the departments within the city, which has fees
f or which the department is responsible has participated in the evaluation of fee levels and
recommendations set forth in the resolution.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 54 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5319
September 26, 2017
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5 3 1 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
THE CITY OF AUBURN FEE SCHEDULE TO
ADJUST FOR 2018 FEES
WHEREAS, in connection with the municipal functions and operations of
the City of Auburn, the City provides various services, a number of which entail
fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council provided for the adoption of a Fee Schedule
with the passage of Ordinance 5707; and
WHEREAS, in the course of reviewing City fees, and in keeping with the
philosophy of setting City fees in amounts reflective of actual costs, and in further
keeping with the intent to make City fees and charges consistently accessible, it
is appropriate to review and amend the fees and charges for City applications
and activities for which fees are charged to adjust for changes to be effective
January 2018.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The City of Auburn Fee Schedule is hereby amended as set
forth in the attached “Exhibit A” and
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon and on January 1, 2018.
Page 55 of 244
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5319
September 26, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2017.
CITY OF AUBURN
________________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Page 56 of 244
Page 1
Exhibit “A”
CITY OF AUBURN FEE SCHEDULE
FEES FOR CITY PERMITS, LICENSES, PUBLICATIONS, AND ACTIONS
Effective January 1, 2018
A. PLANNING FEES (Per Ordinance No. 5707, Ordinance No. 5715, Ordinance No. 5819,
Resolution No. 3797, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4070, Resolution No. 4117,
Resolution No. 4143, Ordinance No. 6077, Resolution No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424,
Ordinance No. 6276, Resolution No. 4552, Ordinance No. 6295, Resolution No. 4868,
Resolution No. 4880, Resolution 4964, Ordinance 6477, Resolution No. 5016,Resolution
5114, Resolution No. 5181, Resolution No. 5213, Resolution No. 5228, Resolution No. 5255,
and Resolution No. 5312, and Resolution No. 5319.)
1. Application Fees: Applications for any action identified below shall not be accepted for
filing, unless otherwise noted, until the fees per the below schedule have been paid to the
City.1
Additional Meeting Fee (beyond the specified number) $267275.00 per
meeting
Additional Re-submittal Fee (covers one re-submittal for all land
use actionsapplied after 3 city reviews of the application)
$6567.00 per
re-submittal
Address Assignment $107.00 per address
Administrative Use Permits (covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply)
$906933.00
Appeal of Administrative Decisions issued under Chapter 1.25, Title
15, Title 16, Title 17 or Title 18 to Hearing Examiner1. Hearing
Examiner costs are included within the appeal fee and are therefore
not billed separately.
$1,0301,061.00
Binding Site Plan 2 (covers 2 meetings with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply)
$1,1731,208.00 +
$6466.00/lot
Boundary Line Adjustment1:
Residential
Non-Residential (includes mixed use projects)
$534550.00
$880906.00
Boundary Line Elimination1 $515530.00
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments 3 (covers 2 meetings with
staff after which additional meeting fees apply)
$2,1322,196.00
(includes rezone
application fee)
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments3 (covers 2 meetings with
staff after which additional meeting fees apply)
$1,0301,061.00
Conditional Use Permits1, 6 (covers 2 meetings with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply)
Residential
$1,0301,061.00 +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
1 Please note that the City of Auburn may collect a review fee on behalf of the Valley Regional Fire Authority for certain
land use and/or environmental reviews which fee is collected in addition to the City’s required fees.
2 Per Auburn City Code, a modification to an approved binding site plan shall be processed in the same manner as the
original binding site plan approval. Therefore, the specified fee shall apply to a new or modified binding site plan
approval request.
3 Fees for amendments to text or maps of the Comprehensive Plan apply only where an applicant seeks an amendment
affecting specific properties rather than the City generally or property within the City generally.
Page 57 of 244
Page 2
All Other (includes mixed use projects)
$2,0602,122.00 +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
Conditional Use Permits 4 – Minor Adjustment (covers 1 meeting
with staff after which additional meeting fees apply)
Residential
All Other (includes mixed use projects)
$426439.00
$571588.00
Critical Areas Review:
Required on-site mitigation, monitoring & reporting 5
Critical Areas Reasonable Use Determination
City review of environmental studies, plans or reports (whether
submitted with another city application or not and includes one
re-submittal)
Critical Areas Variance – administrative
Critical Areas Variance – hearing examiner1, 6
$309318.00 + actual
costs for inspection and
report preparation by
contracted
professional.
$267275.00
$267275.00/study, plan
or report
$267275.00
$10001,030.00 + total
hourly charge for
Hearing Examiner +
associated expenses to
be paid by applicant
prior to issuance of final
decision.
Current Use Taxation (covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply)
$824849.00
Development Agreement – Amendment $2,2662,334.00 +
$6264.00/lot or dwelling
unit
Downtown Urban Center Design Review and/or Major Modifications
to Already Issued Design Review Decisions (covers 1 meeting with
staff after which additional meeting fees apply)
$1,1731,208.00
Downtown Urban Center Design Review Minor Modification
(applies to already issued design review decisions)
$196.00
Environmental Review (covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply)
SEPA Checklist review1 (includes City issuance of DNS, MDNS,
or DS as appropriate)
$826851.00 +
$267275.00 /required
study
4 Per Auburn City Code, a major adjustment to an approved conditional use permit shall be processed in the same
manner as the original conditional use permit approval. Therefore, the specified fee shall apply to a new request for
conditional use permit approval or a request for a major adjustment to a previously approved conditional use permit
approval.
5 For monitoring required over multiple years, the total monitoring fee for the required monitoring period shall be paid
prior to final plat approval or issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or release of required financial security.
Page 58 of 244
Page 3
Revised or Supplemental SEPA Checklist review1 (includes City
issuance of Addendum, if appropriate)
SEPA 3rd Party Review
$360371.00 +
$267275.00 /required
study
Actual costs
Environmental Impact Statement $826851.00 + actual
costs for preparation of
draft & final statements
including labor,
materials, mailing &
other actual costs
relating to the drafting
& circulating of the EIS.
Final Plats – Subdivisions (covers 2 meetings with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply and 1 re-submittal)
$1,5641,611.00 +
$5456.00/lot
Final Plats – Short Plats (covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional meeting fees apply and 1 re-submittal)
$773796.00 +
$2627.00/lot
Flexible Development Alternatives Application Review (covers 1
meeting with staff after which additional meeting fees apply and 1
re-submittal)
$1,1731,208.00
Hearing Examiner – Conduct of Hearing and Preparation of
Decision 6
Total hourly charge for
hearing examiner plus
associated expenses to
be paid by applicant
prior to issuance of final
decision
Floodplain Development Permit: Level One $267275.00
Floodplain Development Permit: Level Two – Habitat impact
Assessment Floodplain Habitat Impact Assessment Report Review
$540.00
Floodplain Development Permit: Level Three – Habitat Impact
Assessment & Hydraulic Analysis (Hydraulic Analysis to be
Conducted by Outside Third Party Consultant) Floodplain Habitat
Mitigation Plan Review
$258540.00 + Third
Party Review Fees
Mitigation Plan Review Associated with a Floodplain Development
Permit Combined Floodplain Habitat Assessment/Mitigation Plan
Review
$515275.00
City Acknowledgement Review of FEMA Flood Map Revision
Application
$103106.00
Mining Permits (covers 3 meetings with staff after which additional
meeting fees apply)
$3,7323,844.00
Miscellaneous Administrative Decisions (i.g. sign area deviation,
written interpretations)
$515530.00
Multi-Family/Mixed Use Design Standards Compliance Review
(application covers 1 meeting with staff after which additional fees
apply)
$1,1731,208.00
6 The total cost for the Hearing Examiner is the responsibility of the applicant and is in addition to the relevant application
fee for applications requiring a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner (e.g. conditional use permit). The applicant
will be billed separately for Hearing Examiner fees after the Hearing Examiner has provided an invoice to the City that
itemizes expenses incurred as a result of their services.
Page 59 of 244
Page 4
Plant Alteration or Vacation6 (application covers 1 meeting with
staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,0301,060.00/request
+ Hearing Examiner
expenses.
Plat Modification (application covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional fees apply)
$1,0301,060.00/request
Preliminary Plats – Subdivisions1, 6 (application covers 3 meetings
with staff after which additional fees apply)
$3,0903,183.00 +
$124128.00/lot +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
Preliminary Plats – Short Plats1 (application covers 1 meeting with
staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,4921,537.00 +
$6264.00/lot
Preliminary Site Plan Review (non-PUD) (application covers 1
meeting with staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,0661,098.00
Pre-application Meeting (application covers 1 meeting with staff
after which additional fees apply)
$267275.00 – fee will
be applied towards any
related application
made within six
monthsone year of the
date the pre-application
meeting was held
PUD – Major Adjustment7 (application covers 2 meetings with staff
after which additional fees apply)
$2,6352,714.00
Public Notice Boards:
2’ x 4’ public notice board
4’ x 4’ public notice board
$8385.00
$140144.00
Rezone – (zoning map amendment)8 (application covers 2
meetings with staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,8131,867.00
School Impact Fee Collection:9
Per Single Family Dwelling Unit
Per Multi-Family Dwelling Unit
$5456.00
$2728.00
Shoreline (application covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional fees apply):
Shoreline Exemption Determination
Shoreline Conditional Use Permit6
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit6
Shoreline Variance6
$221228.00
$1,1731,208.00 +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
$1,1731,208.00 +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
$1,1731,208.00 +
Hearing Examiner
expenses.
Short Plat Modification (application covers 1 meeting with staff after
which additional fees apply)
$267275.00/requested
modification
7 A prior City Code amendment eliminated Planned Unit Developments (PUD). The PUD fees included herein are
applicable only to the existing previously approved PUDs.
8 Application fee covers 2 meetings with staff after which additional meeting fees apply.
9 The City collects an application fee to cover the reasonable cost of administration of the school impact fee program.
Page 60 of 244
Page 5
Sign Permit 10 $103.00
Site Plan Approval – PUD, Residential9 (application covers 1
meeting with staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,1731,208.00 +
$6466.00/lot or unit
Site Plan Approval - PUD, Non-residential9 (application covers 1
meeting with staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,1731,208.00 +
$6466.00/lot or unit
Special Home Occupation Permits $267275.00
Third Party Review of Reports $172.00 + Actual Costs
of Consultant
Three-Party Outside Utility Extension Agreement - Site Specific
Review (application covers 1 meeting with staff after which
additional fees apply)
$1,0661,098.00 + plus
the City’s actual costs
in performing under the
terms of the agreement
as negotiated between
the parties
Type I Temporary Use Permit $99102.00 + $5052.00
per extension request
Type II Temporary Use Permit $148153.00 +
$5052.00 per extension
request
Variance1 (inclusive of Special Exceptions):
Per each residence on a single family lot
Administrative
Variance before Hearing Examiner
$267275.00
$592610.00
$1,0001,030.00
Water/Sewer Certificate1 (outside of city limits for other than one
single-family residence)
$320330.00
Zoning Certification Letter:
Residential
Non-Residential (includes mixed use development)
$5456.00
$107110.00
Zoning Code Text Amendment (application covers 1 meeting with
staff after which additional fees apply)
$1,0661,098.00
2. BOOKS, MAPS, MATERIALS:11(pursuant to Resolution No. 3953)
Comprehensive Plan Cost of Production
Downtown Plan Cost of Production
Downtown Plan Appendices Cost of Production
Copies of Codes and Ordinances Cost of Production
Maps Cost of Production
3. LAND CLEARING, GRADING AND FILLING FEES (Per Ordinance No. 6146, Resolution
No. 4272 Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Land Clearing:
Base Fee (for up to 1 acre)
1 to 5 acres
Over 5 acres
$320330.00
Base Fee + $117121.00/acre
Base Fee + $8689.00/acre
Grading and Filling Fees:
Base Fee without FAC (for up to 500 cubic yards)
Base Fee with FAC (for up to 500 cubic yards)
500 to 250,000 cubic yards
Over 250,000 cubic yards
$552.00
$320330.00
Base Fee + $0.12/cubic yard
Base Fee + $0.02/cubic yard
10 The City collects an application fee to cover the reasonable cost of zoning compliance review in addition to the
building permit application fee identified in Table 1-A, below.
11 Prices for printed materials do not include any taxes.
Page 61 of 244
Page 6
4. BUILDING FEES (per Ordinance 5715, Ordinance 5819, Resolution No. 3773, Resolution
No. 3797, Resolution No. 3818, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4143, Ordinance
No. 6146, Resolution No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424, Resolution No. 5134, and
Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
a. Building Permit Fees: Building permit fees are based upon a project’s construction
valuation as set forth by the International Code Council (ICC). ICC’s construction
valuation table is hereby incorporated into the City of Auburn’s fees schedule.
Construction valuations will be updated on January 1st of each year. The fee for each
International Building Code, International Residential Code, Washington State Energy
Code or Washington State Indoor Air Quality Code building permit shall be as set forth in
Table 1-A, below.12
12 Please note that the City of Auburn may collect a review fee for the Valley Regional Fire Authority for certain permit
applications that is collected in addition to the City’s required fees.
Page 62 of 244
Page 7
Table 1-A BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION FEE
$1.00 to $500.00 $32.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $32.00 for the first $500.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $122.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $18.60 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $549.80 for the first $25,000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $899.80 for the first $50,000.00 plus $10.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
and including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,399.80 for the first $100,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
and including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,999.80 for the first $500,000.00 plus $8.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00 and up $8,999.80 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours .................................................................................................................... $6365.00 per hour1
(minimum charge – two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 109.4.13 ..................................................................................... $6365.00 per hour1
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ....................................................................................................... $6365.00 per hour1
(minimum charge – one half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans .................................................................... $6365.00 per hour1
(minimum charge – one half hour)
5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both ................................................................................. Actual costs2
FOOTNOTES:
1 Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages
and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
b. Mechanical Permit Fees: The fee for each permit issued under provisions of the
International Mechanical Code, International Fuel Gas Code, NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas
Code), NFPA 58 (Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code), or the mechanical device provisions of
the International Residential Code shall be as set forth in Table 2-A, below. For new single-
family dwellings a flat rate permit fee of $185.00 may be charged in lieu of fees as
prescribed in Table 2-A. For new multi-family dwellings, a flat rate permit fee of $125129.00
may be charged in lieu of fees prescribed in Table 2-A.
Table 2-A MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance and Heaters:
1. For the issuance of each mechanical permit ......................................................................................................................................... $2526.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been canceled or finaled ........................................ $9.00
32. In addition to the base mechanical permit fee, each mechanical fixture shall include a charge of…………………………………… .. $12.00
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour (minimum charge -- two hours) ................................................................... $6365.00
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 109.4.13 .... $61.003. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour
(minimum charge -- one-half hour) ....................................................................................................................................................... $6365.00
3. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which
an initial review has been completed (minimum charge -- one-half hour) ......................................................................................... $6365.00
* Or the total cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe
benefits of the employees involved.
c. Plumbing Code Permit Fees: For new single-family dwellings a flat rate permit fee of
$185191.00 may be charged in lieu of fees as prescribed in Table 3-A. For new multi-family
dwellings, a flat rate permit fee of $125.00 may be charged in lieu of fees prescribed in
Table 3-A.
Page 63 of 244
Page 8
Table 3-A PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance:
1. For issuing each permit ................................................................................................................................................................. $2526.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit ................................................................................................................................................ $12.00
32. In addition to the base mechanical permit fee, each mechanical fixture shall include a charge of……………………………………$10.00
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours ................................................................................................................................ $6365.00
2. Reinspection fee ............................................................................................................................................................................ $6365.00
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ................................................................................................................... $6365.00
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) ............ $6365.00
*Per hour for each hour worked or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of all the employees involved.
d. Demolition Permit Fees: Demolition permits shall be charged a base fee of $126130.00.
Fees: Permit fees shall be assessed in accordance with this section. Fees specified shall be
adjusted for inflation each year based upon the Seattle Consumer Price Index. Fees shall be
rounded down to nearest whole dollar.
Appeal Fees: The fee for appeals of codes adopted pursuant to ACC Chapter 15 shall be
$110113.00 plus total hearing examiner costs.
Plan Review Fees: When submitted documents are required by Section 106.3 of the
Construction Administrative Code, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting the
submittal documents for plan review. Said plan review fee shall be 65 percent of the building
permit fee as shown in Table 1-A. The plan review fees specified in this section are separate
fees from the permit fees and in addition to permit fees.
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Fees: There shall be a fee equal to $260.00 ten
percent of the building permit fee for issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy and a fee
of $130.00 for any subsequent extensions requested.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTIONS: In addition
to any other fees specified in this chapter, there shall be a fee schedule for certain
administrative procedures not otherwise included as set forth in the following schedule of
fees:
Adult Family Home Inspection $160165.00
Demolition, permit and inspections Per Table 1-A
Relocation (pre-inspection) Per Table 1-A
Housing Inspection Actual City Cost, minimum $21.00
Change of Use Per Table 1-A
Sign Permits Unless except by Ch. 18.56 ACC,
the fee shall accompany each
application for a sign permit. The
amount of the fee shall be based
upon the value of the sign
pursuant to Table 1-A.
6. RENTAL HOUSING BUSINESS LICENSE FEES (Per Resolution No. 4601, Ordinance No.
5882, Resolution No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424 and Ordinance 6477):
a. The fee for a license to operate rental housing
businesses in the City, as defined in Chapter 5.22 of
the Auburn City Code (ACC) shall be based on the total
number of units as follows:
One to four dwelling units
Five to 24 dwelling units
Twenty-five or more dwelling units
Communal residence
$53.00/year
$106.00/year
$212.00/year
$150.00/year
b. The fee for a license to operate rental housing businesses in the city shall be for the license
year from January 1 to December 31, and each applicant must pay the full fee for the
Page 64 of 244
Page 9
current license year or any portion thereof during which the applicant has engaged in the
operation of rental housing businesses.
c. The rental housing business license fee required by this chapter is in lieu of, and not in
addition to, the general business license fee required by Chapters 5.05 and 5.10 of the
Auburn City Code (ACC); provided, however, that any person required to obtain a rental
housing business license must also obtain a general business license, at no cost, pursuant
to Chapters 5.05 and 5.10 of the Auburn City Code (ACC).
d. Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section (1) of this section, the fee for operating rental
housing facilities for any single individual, partnership, corporation or entity shall not exceed
$424.00 per license period.
Rental housing business license renewals shall be for the period January 1 through December
31 of each year.
Page 65 of 244
Page 10
B. ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS FEES
1. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule: (Per Ordinance No. 5763 as amended by
Resolution No. 3953, Ordinance No. 6005, Resolution No. 4103, Resolution No. 4424, Resolution
4964, Resolution No. 5114, Resolution No. 5181, and Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No.
5319.)
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Industrial
General Light
Industrial 110 sf/gfa 0.97 $7.888.02 -
General Heavy
Industrial 120 sf/gfa 0.68 $6.196.30 -
Industrial Park 130 sf/gfa 0.85 $6.917.03 -
Manufacturing 140 sf/gfa 0.73 $3.563.62 -
Warehousing 150 sf/gfa 0.32 $3.643.70 -
Mini-
Warehouse/Storage 151 sf/gfa 0.26 $1.941.98 -
Residential
Single-Family
(detached) 210 du 1.00 $4,459.894,537.89 $3,612.513,675.
69
Multi-Family 220-233 du 0.62 $2,923.142,974.26 $2,367.742,409.
15
Mobile Home 240 du 0.59 $2,105.072,141.88 -
Senior Housing 251, 252 du 0.27 $963.34980.18 $780.30793.95
Lodging
Hotel 310 room 0.60 $3,058.213,111.69 $2,477.152,520.
47
Motel 320 room 0.47 $2,395.602,437.49 -
Recreational
Movie Theater 444, 445 seat 0.08 $199.29202.78 $147.48150.06
Health Club 492, 493 sf/gfa 3.53 $10.4610.64 $7.747.88
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Institutional
Elementary School 520 student 0.15 $259.95264.49 $192.36195.73
Middle School/Jr.
High 522 student 0.16 $440.38448.08 $325.88331.58
High School 530 student 0.13 $490.33498.91 $362.85369.19
Church 560 sf/gfa 0.55 $2.592.64 $1.921.95
Day Care Center 565 sf/gfa 12.34 $23.5924.00 $17.4517.76
Library 590 sf/gfa 7.30 $11.8612.07 $8.788.93
Medical
Page 66 of 244
Page 11
Hospital 610 sf/gfa 0.93 $4.744.82 $3.843.91
Asst. Living, Nursing
Home 254, 620 bed 0.22 $784.94798.67 -
Office
General Office 710,
715, 750 sf/gfa 1.49 $8.728.87 $5.936.03
Medical Office 720 sf/gfa 3.57 $16.3816.66 $11.1411.33
Post Office 732 sf/gfa 11.22 $18.2318.55 $12.4012.61
Retail
Free Standing
Discount Superstore 813 sf/gla 4.35 $8.388.53 $6.206.31
Free Standing
Discount Store 815 sf/gla 4.98 $11.0611.26 $8.198.33
Hardware/Paint Store 816 sf/gla 4.84 $7.767.90 $5.745.84
Shopping Center 820 sf/gla 3.71 $6.556.67 $4.854.93
Car Sales – New 841 sf/gla 2.59 $12.1512.36 $8.999.14
Car Sales – Used N/A space 0.28 $1,312.991,355.95 $971.61988.61
Automobile Parts
Sales 843 sf/gla 5.98 $7.387.51 $5.465.56
Tire Store 848 sf/gla 4.15 $8.388.52 $6.206.31
Supermarket 850 sf/gla 9.48 $16.2416.52 $12.0112.22
Convenience Market 851 sf/gla 52.41 $33.8634.45 $25.0625.49
Home Improvement
Store 862 sf/gla 2.33 $3.243.30 $2.402.44
Drugstore w/o Drive-
Through 880 sf/gla 8.40 $8.558.70 $6.336.44
Drugstore w/ Drive-
Through 881 sf/gla 9.91 $10.9511.14 $8.108.24
Furniture Store 890 sf/gla 0.45 $0.460.47 $0.340.35
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Services
Drive-in Bank 912 sf/gfa 24.30 $24.6225.05 $18.2218.54
Quality Restaurant 931 sf/gfa 7.49 $18.1718.49 $13.4513.68
High Turnover
Restaurant 932 sf/gfa 9.85 $16.4616.74 $12.1812.39
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive-Through 933 sf/gfa 26.15 $33.9934.58 $25.1525.59
Fast Food Restaurant
w/ Drive-Through 934 sf/gfa 32.65 $42.4443.18 $31.4031.95
Espresso Stand w/
Drive-Through 938 sf/gfa 75.00 $32.4933.06 $24.0524.47
Auto Care Center 942 sf/gfa 3.11 $6.106.21 $4.524.60
Page 67 of 244
Page 12
Service Station 944 vfp 13.87 $17,426.4517,731.
23
$12,895.5813,12
1.11
Service Station w/
Mini-Mart 945 vfp 13.51 $12,876.9413,102.
15
$9,528.939,695.
59
Lakeland PUD (Per Ordinance No. 4867 as amended by Resolution No. 2955, Ordinance
No. 6176 and Resolution No. 5181.)
Detached Single-
Family Residential
Unit
N/A du n/a $1,273.931,307.06 -
Attached Single-
Family/Multi-Family
Unit
N/A du n/a $826.87848.37 -
Senior-Family Unit N/A du n/a $284.14291.53 -
Commercial/Retail
Units N/A sf/gfa n/a $3.313.39 -
Administrative Fee for Independent Fee Calculation $200.00
Notes:
A. Basic trip rates are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition.
B. Impact fee rate calculation is based upon the following methodology:
– Basic Trip Rate = PM Peak Hour Trip Generation (per unit of measure)
– Basic Trip Rate x Percent of New Trips x Trip Length Adjustment x Per Trip Fee/(divide
by) 1,000 for rate per square foot (where applicable) = Impact Fee Rate (per unit of measure)
C. For land uses not specifically identified here, trip generation rates could be derived from ITE
or a special study by the applicant.
D. sf/GFA= Square feet Gross Floor Area; sf/GLA= Square Feet Gross Leasable Area;
VFP=Vehicle Fueling Position.
E. Projects eligible for the Downtown Fee Rate are those located entirely within the boundary
identified on Figure 1.
Page 68 of 244
Page 13
2. Truck-Dependant Land Use Supplementary Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule:
(Per Resolution No. 4122, Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 5181, and Resolution No.
5319.)
Land Use
ITE Land
Use Code
Independent
Variable
Truck
Trip Rate
Impact Fee Rate
(per sf)
Industrial
Light Industry/Manufacturing 110, 130,
140 sf/gfa $0.06 $0.110.12
Heavy Industry 120 sf/gfa $0.04 $0.090.07
Retail
Shopping Center 820
sf/gla $0.01 $0.010
02
Car Sales 841 sf/gfa $0.09 $0.160.14
Supermarket 850 sf/gfa $0.33 $0.640.62
Free-Standing Discount Store 813, 815,
861, 863,
864
sf/gfa $0.10 $0.190.19
Home Improvement Store 862 sf/gfa $0.37 $0.700.70
Land Use
ITE Land
Use Code
Independent
Variable
Truck
Trip Rate
Impact Fee Rate
(per sf)
Services
Restaurant 931, 932 sf/gfa 0.63 $1.201.18
Fast Food Restaurant 933, 934 sf/gfa 2.87 $5.515.41
Notes:
A. ITE Land Use Code based on ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition
B. Impact fee rate calculation is based upon the following methodology:
- Truck Trip Rate = Daily Truck Trip Generation (per unit of measure)
- Truck Trip Rate x Per Trip Fee = Impact Fee Rate (per unit of measure)
C. For land uses not specifically identified in the table, trip generation rates could be derived
from a special study by the applicant.
D. sf /gfa=square feet of gross floor area
3. Impact Fees By Land Use – Revenue Credit = 20% (Per Ordinance No. 5977, Resolution
3953, and Resolution No. 4022)
Land Use Total Fire & EMS
Cost per Unit of
Development
Adjustment
(Revenue Credit)
at 20%
Fire and EMS
Impact Fee per
Unit of
Development
Residential – All calculations below are per dwelling unit – Total x Number of Units
Single Family, Duplex, Mobile
Home $362.66 $72.53 $290.13
Multi-Family $383.09 $76.62 $306.47
Non-Residential – All calculations below are per square foot - Total x Square Feet
Hotel/Motel $0.53 $0.11 $0.42
Hospital/Clinic $1.05 $0.21 $0.84
Group Living $2.63 $0.53 $2.10
Office $0.29 $0.06 $0.23
Retail $0.62 $0.12 $0.50
Restaurant/Bar/Lounge $1.62 $0.32 $1.30
Industrial/Manufacturing $0.11 $0.02 $0.09
Page 69 of 244
Page 14
Leisure/Outdoors $1.08 $0.22 $0.86
Agriculture $0.71 $0.14 $0.57
Church $0.38 $0.08 $0.30
Schools/Colleges $1.07 $0.21 $0.86
Government/Public Buildings $1.81 $0.36 $0.86
Casino $3.78 $0.77 $3.01
Jails $21.99 $4.40 $17.59
4. Facility Extension Fees: (Per Ordinance No. 5791 and amended by Ordinance No. 5819,
Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 5114, and
Resolution No. 5319.)
The Facility Extension Application Fee is $56952.00, plus $17267.00 for each Facility (Water,
Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage, Street, private street and private storm systems within private
streets).
Facility Extension Fees are the summation of the following categories (a+b+c+d), or $1,710660.00,
whichever is greater.
a. For the combined linear footage of water, sewer, storm drainage and private storm drainage
within private streets:
The first 0 lineal feet (LF) to 1000 LF is charged at $5.7050 per LF plus,
The next 1001 LF to 2500 LF is charged at $2.9080 per LF plus,
Any additional over 2500 LF is charged at $1.7065 per LF.
b. For the linear footage of streets and private streets:
The first 0 LF to 500 LF will be charged at $76.1090 per LF plus,
The next 501 LF to 1000 LF will be charged at $4.2010 per LF plus,
Any additional over 1000 LF will be charged at $1.10 per LF.
c. For non-linear extensions such as pump stations or traffic signals, the extension fee will be
determined by the City Engineer based on an estimate of the City’s labor Cost associated with
the plan review, inspection, and administration of the application.
d. For that portion of the water or sewer facility located outside City Limits, but within existing
County (King or Pierce) right-of-way, an additional fee of $45744.00 plus $5.1000 per LF of the
combined water and sewer extension located in the existing County right-of-way applies.
Facility Extension Fees will be paid as follows:
a. Forty percent (40%) at the time of execution of the facility extension agreement.
b. Sixty percent (60%) upon the City’s approval of the construction drawings and prior to the start
of construction.
Additional Review:
Each additional plan review beyond a 3rd review prior to plan approval will require an
additional fee of $52712.00 be paid at the time of the additional review submittal. If the
review requires more than 8 hours of staff time to complete an additional fee of $664.00
per hour will be charged and must be paid prior to plan approval.
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans during
construction will require an additional fee of $26456.00 be paid at the time the additional
review is submitted and prior to any review being completed. If the review requires more
Page 70 of 244
Page 15
than 4 hours of staff time to complete an additional fee of $664.00 per hour will be
charged and must be paid prior to plan approval.
5. Right-of Way Use Permit Fees: (Per Ordinance No. 6125, and Resolution No. 5255, and
Resolution No. 5319.)
Type A – Banner $520.00
Type B – Short Term $620.00
Type C – Long Term $2580.00 for the 1st year (or any term longer
than 30 days and less than 1 year)/
$1030.00 for each additional year (or portion
thereof) up to 5 years
Type D – Hauling $1030.00 + estimated staff time @ $52.00
per hour
Street Closure – Type B or C $930.00
Sidewalk Closure – Type B or C $620.00
Parking Closure – Type B or C $620.00
6. Franchise Agreements: (Per Ordinance No. 6546, Resolution No. 5114, and Resolution No.
5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Application/Renewal/Amendment Application Fee
(ACC 13.36.040, ACC 20.06.120, ACC 20.06.130)
$5,150000.00 Nonrefundable Initial Fee +
plus the City’s actual costs incurred in
excess of $5,150000.00. Initial Fee is due
at time of application any additional costs
beyond the initial fee is due prior to the
effective date of the agreement.
Annual Administration Fee (ACC 20.04.170) Actual City Costs
Annual CATV Franchise Fee (ACC 13.36.230) 5% of Gross Revenue for the prior three
months.
Other Annual Franchise Fee (ACC 20.06.100) Statutorily Permissible Percent of Gross
Revenue
7. Public Way Agreements: (Per Ordinance No.6546, Resolution No.5114, and Resolution No.
5319.)
Application/Renewal Application Fee (ACC
20.04.020, ACC 20.04.120)
$5,015000.00 nonrefundable Initial Fee +
plus the City’s actual costs incurred in
excess of $5,150000.00. Initial Fee is due
at time of application any additional costs
beyond the initial fee is due prior to the
effective date of the agreement.
Annual Fee (ACC 20.04.170) Actual City Costs
8. Right-of-Way Vacations: (Per Resolution No. 4143, and Resolution No. 5114, and Resolution
No. 5319.)
Application Fee $1,54500.00
Land Value Compensation Per ACC 12.48.085
9. Utility System Development Fees: (Per Ordinance No. 5819 and amended by Resolution No.
3797, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424, Resolution No. 5114,
Resolution No. 5134, Resolution No. 5181, and Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
For all utilities, a charge in lieu of assessment or payback charges may be applicable for the
proportional share of the utility line being connected to.
Page 71 of 244
Page 16
a. Water Utility: Connection fees are comprised of a Water Service Installation Permit Fee and the
System Development Charge as follows:
Meter
Size
(In
Inches)
Water Service Installation Permit Fee System
Development
Charge (SDC) Water Service & Meter Box Installed by City(2)**
Paved Street Unpaved Street
¾ or less $375345.00 $3,7003,660.00#(3) $2,1502,125.00 $6,6306,519.00
1 $430405.00 $3,7503,720.00#(3) $2,2002,185.00 $6,6306,519.00
1-1/2 $1,010915.00 $5,3005,185.00#(3) $3,8003,650.00 $22,07721,708.00
2 $1,080975.00 $5,7505,625.00#(3) $4,2004,090.00 $35,33634,745.00
3 Actual Cost By ApplicantActual Cost By ApplicantActual
Cost
$70,73869,556.00
4 Actual Cost By ApplicantActual Cost By ApplicantActual
Cost
$110,516108,669.00
6 Actual Cost By ApplicantActual Cost By ApplicantActual
Cost
$220,968217,274.00
8 Actual Cost Actual CostBy Applicant By ApplicantActual
Cost
$353,562347,652.00
10 Actual Cost By ApplicantActual Cost By ApplicantActual
Cost
$508,298499,801.00
(1)*Installation of a water meter done by the City and the service either already exists or has been
installed by the developerApplicant.
(2)**Installation of the entire water service is done by the City.
(3)#If meter installation or retrofit involves installation of a fire sprinkler line, fee is Actual Cost.
b. Sanitary Sewer Utility: Connection fees are comprised of a Ppermit Fee and the System
Development Charge as follows:
Type Permit Fee System Development
Charge (SDC)*
New Connection(4)* $190185.00 $2,4602,419.00 Per
RCE(5)**
Side Sewer Repair on Private
Property
$78.00
Side Sewer Repair in Right-of-
Way*
$155.00
Grinder Ppump (New
Connection)(4)
$265255.00 $2460.00 per RCE(5)
Demolition Cap (cap side sewer
before building demolition)
$78.00
Tenant Improvement(4) $6055.00 $2,4602,419.00 Per nNet
iIncrease in RCE’s(5)**
(4)* All construction is the responsibility of the Applicant. If a new connection or repair requires work
within City right-of-way, a Construction Permit (EXC - see Section 11) is required in addition to the
Sewer Permit. If a new connection requires work within City right-of-way, a construction
permit is required in addition to the sewer permit.
(5)** RCE, Residential Customer Equivalent - Aan RCE shall be as defined by the King County
Department of Natural Resources.
NOTE: In addition to City sanitary sewer connection fees, King County will impose a there shall be
a sanitary sewer connection fee (King County Capacity Charge) imposed by King County for
improvements in King County’s regional sewer system, in accordance with King County Code
28.84.050. King County will bill customers directly for this charge once the sewer work is complete.
Page 72 of 244
Page 17
This charge is not to be paid to the City. to pay Capital Improvement fees to King County per the
King County Rate Schedule.
c. Storm Drainage Utility: (Per Resolution No. 4566 and amended by Resolution No. 5181, and
Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Connection fees are comprised of a Permit Fee and the System Development Charge as follows:
Type Permit Fee(6) System
Development
Charge (SDC)
Level 1 $215.00
Level 2 $415.00
Level 3 (7) Base Fee = $1,485.00 for up to 10,000 SF of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #1 = Base Fee + $415.00 for 10,001
SF up to 43,560 SF (1 Acre) of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #2 = Cumulative Additional Fee #1 +
$105.00 per whole or partial Acre disturbed over 1 Acre
Level 1 $215.00
Level 2 $415.00
Level 3 (7) Base Fee = $1,485.00 for up to 10,000 SF of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #1 = Base Fee + $415.00 for 10,001
SF up to 43,560 SF (1 Acre) of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #2 = Cumulative Additional Fee #1 +
$105.00 per whole or partial Acre disturbed over 1 Acre
*ESU, Equivalent Service Unit - A configuration of development of hard surfaces 13 estimated to
contribute an amount of runoff to the City’s storm drainage system which is approximately equal to
that created by the average single family residential parcel. One ESU is considered equal to 2,600
square feet of parcel coverage by hard surfaces. Per ACC 13.48.010.
When calculating the total SDC, a credit will be applied for the existing hard surface area (New total SDC minus
calculated SDC for existing hard surface area using the definition of hard surface as given in ACC 13.48.010).
STORM PERMIT FEE
Permit Level** Permit Fee
Level 1 $210.00
Level 2 $400.00
Level 3 Base Fee + the Cumulative Additional Fees as indicated below:
Base Fee = $1,440.00 for up to 10,000 SF of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #1 = Base Fee + $400.00 for 10,001 SF up to 43,560 SF (1
Acre) of disturbed area
Cumulative Additional Fee #2 = Cumulative Additional Fee #1 + $100.00 per Acre for
each additional disturbed Acre over 1 Acre
(6)**Permit levels are determined as follows:
• Level 1 permits are for all projects that are not located in a Critical Area and add or replace less than 2,000
square feet of hard surface area; and/or disturb less than 7,000 square feet of land.
13 Hard Surfaces include impervious surfaces, permeable pavements, and vegetated roofs.
Page 73 of 244
Page 18
Note: Single-family residential projects disturbing 500 square feet or less may not require a permit.
• Level 2 permits are for all projects that add or replace 2,000 to 4,999 square feet of hard surface area; or
disturb 7,000 square feet or more of land.
• Level 3 permits are for all projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of hard surface area, or convert ¾
acres or more of native vegetation to lawn/landscaped area, or convert 2.5 acres or more of native
vegetation to pasture, or the new plus replaced hard surface area is 5,000 square feet or more and the
value of improvements exceeds 50% of the assessed value of existing improvements.
(7)Level 3 permit is calculated as the Base Fee plus the Cumulative Additional Fees described herein.
(8)ESU, Equivalent Service Unit - A configuration of development of hard surfaces (which include impervious
surfaces, permeable pavements, and vegetated roofs) estimated to contribute an amount of runoff to the
City’s storm drainage system which is approximately equal to that created by the average single family
residential parcel. Although gravel surfaces are considered a hard surface under ACC 13.48.010, existing
gravel surfaces are not included in the calculation of the SDCs. One ESU is considered equal to 2,600 square
feet of parcel coverage by hard surfaces. Per ACC 13.48.010.
When calculating the total SDC, a credit will be applied for the existing hard surface area except existing
gravel surfaces (e.g., new total SDC minus calculated SDC for existing hard surface area using the definition
of hard surface as given in ACC 13.48.010).
10. Other Utility Fees: (Per Ordinance No. 5819, Ordinance No. 5944, Resolution No. 3797,
Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4424, Resolution No. 5114, Resolution No. 5134, and
Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Fireline Connection Permit (≤ 3-inch fire service line) $140135.00
Hydrant Permit and Inspection Fee $245238.00
Hydrant Meter Monthly Rate $48.04
Fire Hydrant Meter Wrench – Refundable Deposit 14(1) $4038.00
Refundable Deposit – Hydrant Meter with RPBA, Valve, and Wrench –
Refundable Deposit(1) (2)2
$2,0451,985.00
Hydrant Meter Water Use Charge (if equipment not returned for final reading) $700.00
Water Meter Test Fee, 2” or less $225217.00
Water Meter Test Fee, greater than 2” At Actual Cost
Water Meter Removal Fee (3/4” to 1”) – (service line remains) $310300.00
Water Meter Removal Fee (1-1/2” to 2”) – (service line remains) $925900.00
Water Meter Removal Fee (3” and larger) – (service line remains) At Actual Cost
Water Service AbandonmentRemoval Permit (City abandons at main,
removes meter and box)
$2,9902,900.00
Water Meter Relocation Permit by City Same as Water
Service Installation
Permit Fee, see
9.a.
Meter Damage/Tamper Repair Permit $500.00 plus
Meter Cost, if
applicable
Water Service Alteration/Repair Permit on Private Property (by Applicant) $80.00
Backflow Permit for Premises Isolation (internal or external) $80.00
Re-Locate Fee (if <45 days from initial locates) $200.00
14 If the equipment is not returned or is returned in a damaged condition, the deposit amount shall be forfeited.
Page 74 of 244
Page 19
Side Sewer Repair Permit on Private Property $80.00
Side Sewer Repair Permit in Right-of-Way(3) $160.00
Demolition Cap Permit (cap side sewer before building demolition) $80.00
Side Sewer Relocation/Replacement Permit $130.00
Oil/Water Separator Permit $205.00
Grease Interceptor Permit(3) $205.00
Storm Drainage Repair Permit – Existing Private System on Private Property $8075.00
Storm Drainage Repair Permit – Existing System in Public Right-of-
Way/Easement 15(3)
$160125.00
Payback Administration Fees: (per Ordinance No. 5954)
Application Fee
Processing Fee
Area of Special Benefit Analysis
Transaction/Collection Fee
Recording Fee
Outside Professional Services
$51500.00
$1,03000.00
$51500.00
$31000.00
$84.00
Time & Materials
Convenience shut off $25.00
Delinquent shut off $25.00
Late charge 1% per month of
outstanding bill
or $15.00
minimum,
whichever is
greater
Unauthorized turn on/off $60.00
Delinquent meter pull $65.00
Unauthorized fire line or water hook up $100.00 a day
fine from date
of discovery
Returned checks each $20.00
Refusal of access per day $30.00
Closing final read $30.00
New account setup $25.00
Bill tenant $25.00
After-hours water turn on/off $30.00
Escrow estimates $25.00
(1)If the equipment is not returned or is returned in a damaged condition, the deposit amount shall be forfeited.
(2)Each year, the hydrant meter with RPBA, Valve, and Wrench must be returned to City no later than December 1 for
maintenance and final annual meter reading. The deposit amount shall be forfeited if the equipment is not returned to the
City by the deadline.
(3)If repair or new construction requires work within City right-of-way, including a new connection to the City’s system, a
Construction Permit (EXC - see Section 11) is required in addition to the permit.
11. Construction Permits: (Per Ordinance No. 5817, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4272,
and Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Basic Fee (BF) $1540.500
Hourly Inspection Rate (HIR):
15 If a repair requires work within City right-of-way, a construction permit is required in addition to the storm
drainage repair permit.
Page 75 of 244
Page 20
Normal Business Hours
After Hours (includes weeknights, weekends, and holidays and will be
charged at the after hours HIR x the duration of the work
$542.00
$830.00
For Excavation Type Work:
Length of Excavation (feet)
31 – 100 feet of excavation length
101 – 250 feet of excavation length
251 – 500 feet of excavation length
501 – 750 feet of excavation length
751 – 1000 feet of excavation length
Additional Fee (AF)
$542.00
$16055.00
$26759.00
$37362.00
$48066.00
Fee Calculation:
Permit Fee = BF + AF (for the appropriate length of excavation)
If the excavation exceeds 1,000 linear feet
Permit Fee = BF + $48066.00 + (HIR x (length of excavation – 1000/100)
For Non-Excavation Type Work: This work includes any work in the public right-of-way that is not
covered by any other permits and includes such things as overhead utility work, geotechnical
borings, horizontal directional drilling and vault installation.
Permit Fee = BF + (HIR x Permit Duration in Days)
In Lieu of Fee: In lieu of the above standard rates, the city engineer or his/her designee may
calculate the fee based upon current labor rates for administrative and inspection staff after
developing an estimate of staff effort involved. For projects that are expected to involve significantly
more than 1,000 feet of street excavation or when the scope or duration cannot be accurately
estimated, the city engineer may establish a deposit account to manage permitee deposits in
advance of permit issuance for reimbursing actual labor costs of administering the permit. Such
deposit accounts will not be interest bearing and will be closed at the end of the permitted work
when a final accounting of the permit administration cost shall be calculated and a final bill or credit
issued to the permitee.
12. Memorial Sign Program: (Per Ordinance No. 6137, and Ordinance No. 6149, and Resolution
No. 5319)
Memorial Sign $1550.00
13.Special Permits: (Per Ordinance No. 5817 and amended by Resolution No. 3953, Resolution
No. 4272, and Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Permit Type Base Fee Additional Per Linear Foot
Sidewalk $564.00 $1.10/foot for each foot over 25
linear feet
Residential Driveway $564.00 $1.7065/foot for each foot over 20
linear feet*
Commercial Driveway $11007.00 $2.20/foot for each foot over 48
linear feet*
*Driveway widths are based on the width of the driveway apron in the right-of-way.
14. Street Payback Agreements: (Per Ordinance No. 6319, and Resolution No. 4624, and
Resolution No. 5319.)
Application Fee $51500.00
Processing Fee $1,03000.00
Assessment Reimbursement Area Analysis $1,03000.00
Transaction/Collection Fee $31000.00
Recording Fee $84.00
Outside Professional Services (when needed) Time and Materials
Page 76 of 244
Page 21
Page 77 of 244
Page 22
C. ANIMAL LICENSING FEES AND PENALTIES (Per Resolution No. 4868):
1. Animal License Fees
Type Comments Cost
Juvenile 8 weeks to 6 months of age $15.00
Altered Proof of spay/neuter required $30.00
Unaltered $60.00
Senior Proof that pet is altered and proof that owner is 62 years of
age or older consistent with ACC 13.24 is required.
$15.00
Disabled Proof that pet is altered and proof of disability required $15.00
Service Animal With a signed statement, on the City Form, indicating that
the owner of the animal has a disability and that the animal
is a service animal, no license fee shall be charged by the
City.
$0
Replacement Tag $5.00
2. Late Payment Penalty
Days Past Expiration Type Additional Cost
45-90 Late Fee $15.00
91-135 Late Fee $20.00
136-364 Late Fee $30.00
365 or more Late Fee $30.00 + prior year’s license fee
Page 78 of 244
Page 23
D. AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FEES (Per Ordinance No. 5707, amended by Ordinance
No. 5715 and Ordinance No. 5819, and amended by Resolution No. 3784, Resolution 3797,
Resolution No. 3841, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4117, Resolution No. 4270, Resolution
No. 4414, Resolution 4734, Resolution No. 4880, Resolution No. 5016, Resolution No. 5114,
Resolution No. 5181, Resolution No. 5213, and Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
1. Lease Fees
Lease Type:
Open G-D
Open C
Closed J
Closed H
Closed Y & Z
Closed Y1 & Z22
Outside Tiedowns
Storage Rows H-D
Storage Units (185 sq. ft. – Buildings Y&Z)
Storage Units (298 sq. ft.)
Storage Units (380 sq. ft. – Buildings Y&Z)
$200.00210.00
$234.00250.00
$335.00372.00
$375.00401.00
$435.00465.00
$$560.00599.00
$75.0080.00
$126.00135.00
$111.00119.00
$135.00144.00
$170.00182.00
A security surcharge of $10.00 per month is charged, in addition to the base monthly rental
fees provided in this section, for each tie-down, each hangar door and each storage rental
area, which security surcharge fees are to be used for the provision of increased security at
the Auburn Municipal Airport (approved by Ordinance No. 5500 on January 16, 2001). For
the purposes hereof, each tie-down consists of the structures/facilities necessary to
accommodate one (1) regular sized light aircraft. Furthermore, the hangar doors to which the
security surcharge applies includes all hangars located at the Auburn Municipal Airport,
including those hangars built on land owned by the City but leased to private parties, and
those hangars owned in a condominium type ownership.
The above lease and security surcharge amounts are subject to applicable leasehold taxes,
which shall be paid by the tenant. The total charges, including the above lease rates plus
lease hold tax and surcharge shall be reflected in monthly billing rates. Tenants shall be
given notice as required by Ordinance or lease agreements. The Airport Lease rates shall be
effective January 1, 20172018.
Payments. Payments are due on the first of each month, past due as of the 5th and late as of
the 15th. Payments not received by the 15th incur a $25.00 late fee. Payments not received
after 30 days from the due date incur an additional $25.00 delinquency fee each month
payment is delinquent.
Automatic gate electronic cards. One automatic gate electronic card will be issued to
each City rental tenant free of charge. Any additional electronic cards requested by a tenant
are subject to a $25.00 fee. A $15.00 fee refund applies to all serviceable returned cards. An
additional $25.00 replacement fee will be assessed against the tenant for all lost or damaged
electronic cards. All electronic cards must be returned to the airport at the time of lease
expiration.
Each lease shall include an initial payment of first and last months’ rent plus a damage
deposit in the amount of two times the monthly base rate. Each lease agreement shall also
include terms that authorize the city to apply the damage deposit to outstanding charges on
termination.
Page 79 of 244
Page 24
2. Daily Transient Parking (overnight)
Tie Down
Open “T”
Enclosed Hangar
$5.00
$25.00
$35.00
3. Base Parking Fee – Designated Spaces
A base vehicle parking fee of $57.0061.00 per month per designated space is
charged. There are ten designated spaces available on a first come basis for pilots to park or
store a vehicle for an extended period of time. All airport rules and regulations apply. A
Vehicle Storage Permit must be completed and appropriate fees paid. The storage of
vehicles is for convenience for the users of the Auburn Airport and is month-to-month.
4. Additional Airport Fees
Gate Cards (each lease gets one card at no charge. Additional cards cost
$25.00. A $15.00 refund applies to all serviceable returned cards.) Limit 2
Cards per space.
$25.00
Annual Aeronautical Business License (includes listing of your business on
airport signs and airport webpage.)
$250.00
Hangar Waitlist Fee $50.00
5. Waiver of Fees for Governmental Entities or Governmental Affiliated Entities
The Mayor is authorized to waive a portion or all of any (otherwise) required fees for hangar
space rental - if space is available - for governmental entities or government affiliated entities
that provide community service(s) and public benefit(s) to residents, citizens and businesses
of Auburn.
Page 80 of 244
Page 25
E. POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES (Per Ordinance No. 5715 amended by Ordinance No. 6216,
5819, Resolution No. 3797, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4117, Resolution No. 4272,
Resolution No. 4424, Ordinance 6216, Ordinance 6276, Resolution No. 4552, Resolution No.
5016, Resolution No. 5114, and Resolution No. 5255. False Alarm fees per Ordinance No.
6216 amended by Ordinance Nos. 6252 and 6345.))
Type Fees
Police Report/Collision Report (fee not charged where
requested by victim or party involved) $13.25
Visa Letter $10.00
Fingerprinting Fees (fee not charged where taking of
fingerprints is required by city) as set by the FBI
Laminated Concealed Pistol License $3.50
Annual Alarm Registration Fees:
Residential
Commercial
Residential Low Income Senior Citizen/Disabled
Citizen
Late Registration Fee
$24.00
$24.00
$12.00
$25.00
Auburn Security Alarm License
Late License Fee
Reinstatement Fee
$10.00/each registered alarm
user to a maximum of $100.00
annually
$25.00
$100.00 plus $10.00/permitted
user
False Alarm Service Fees
Burglar False Alarm Service Fee*
Robbery, Panic and Burglary Crime in Progress False
Alarm Fee*
Supplemental Fee for Non-permitted Alarm System,
each alarm
Fee for false alarm caused by Monitoring Company or
Alarm Installation Company employee
First Dispatch Report during time of suspension
Each dispatch thereafter
Late Fee
Appeals
*The alarm administrator will waive the first false alarm
fee following the installation of an alarm system at a
particular address.
$100.00
$200.00
$200.00
$100.00
$100.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
Page 81 of 244
Page 26
F. CITY CLERK FEES (Per Ordinance No. 5715, Ordinance No. 5819, Resolution No. 3797,
Resolution No. 4244, Resolution No. 5016, Resolution No. 5114 and Resolution No. 5312.)
Type Fees
Fees for public records – collection
Non-certified photocopies of public records, printed
copies of electronic public records when requested by
the person requesting records
$0.15 per page plus postage
Certified copies of public records $5.00 per document plus
copying fees
Scanned public records into an electronic format $0.10 per page
Electronic files or attachments uploaded to email, cloud-
based storage service or other means of electronic
delivery
$0.05 per each 4 electronic
files
Transmission of public records in an electronic format $0.10 per gigabyte
Digital Storage Media or Device; Container or Envelope
Used to Mail Copies to Requestor, and Postage
Actual Cost
$
$
Fees for Auburn City Code book and supplements
Copy of Auburn City Code book (with latest supplement)
$100.00 per code book
Supplements to the Auburn City Code book $11.00 per copy
Page 82 of 244
Page 27
G. CITY CEMETERY FEES (Per Ordinance 5715, Resolution No. 3797, Resolution No. 3953,
Resolution No. 4027, Resolution No. 4103, Resolution No. 4117, Resolution No. 4272
Resolution No. 4424, Resolution No. 4552, Resolution No. 4675, Resolution 4778, Resolution
No. 4880, Resolution 5114, Resolution No. 5134, Resolution No. 5181, and Resolution No.
5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
Type Fees
Graves
Section 9A and 9B
All other adult graves
Child’s Place
Double Depth (includes 2 burial spaces / 2 liners)
Section 9A and 9B (Quads and Upright monument plots)
Section 9B (Plaza Estates)
$2,795.00
$2,295.00$2,395.00
$300.00
$4,690.00$4,790.00
$5,995.00 each
$9,995.00 each
Ground Cremation Plots
Centennial Um Garden (single)
Centennial Um Garden (double)
Section 9 Upright Section Um Plots (up to 4 urns)
$995.00
$1,895.00
$3,195.00
Niches
Mausoleum (top rows available only) – single
Centennial Columbarium II (1 or 2 urns) – Row 2
Centennial Columbarium II (1 or 2 urns) – Row 1
$Sold Out
$2,295.00
$1,895.00$1,995.00
Chapel of Memories – Interior Niches* Range From
12 x 12 Single
12 x 18 Double
12 x 24 Family (up to 3 urns)
*The above niche prices include one bud vase per niche.
Inurnment will be $695.00 per occasion. See guidelines for
additional pertinent information. A single inscription on the glass
front is $240 plus tax. Urn’s to be purchased separately.
$2,695.00 - $3,995.00
$3,695.00 - $6,495.00
$6,995.00 - $8,695.00
Chapel of Memories – Exterior Niches*
Rows 4, 5, & 6
Rows 2 & 3
Rows 1, 7, & 8
*If the niche (external) is to be used as a double niche, the
inurnment, inscription and tax will be due when a second urn is
placed. (Row 1 is the bottom row)
$2,695.00
$2,295.00
$1,895.00$1,995.00
OVERTIME WILL BE CHARGED AT $175.00 PER HOUR AFTER 4:30 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH
FRIDAY. THE SATURDAY SERVICE CHARGE IS $795.00 FOR FULL INTERMENT AND $425.00 FOR
CREMATION SERVICES.
Extended Land Use $495.00
Memorial Plaque - $175 additional for inscription + tax $295.00
Services
“Chapel of Memories” rental for services
Opening and Closing – Ground Burials
Liner/Vault
Children’s Place
Opening and Closing – Cremation
ForestWalk
Cremation Plot
Niche
$350.00
$1,495.00
$490.00
$795.00
$695.00
Page 83 of 244
Page 28
Opening and Closing – Entombment
Marker Services
Flat Grass:
Inscription
Setting Fee
Resetting Fee
New Inspection Fee for outside sales
Upright
Setting Fee
Inscription
Resetting Fee
Vase Setting Fee
Recording Fee
Overtime Charge – per hour
Saturday Service Fee
Full Interment
Cremation
$1,295.00
$240.00 $265.00 + tax
$295.00 + tax
$150.00 + tax
$175.00
$475.00 + tax
$390.00 + tax
$325.00
$45.00 + tax
$100.00
$175.00
$795.00
$425.00$450.00
Materials
Flower Vases: (prices include vase setting fee)
Standard
Deluxe Cast Zinc (gray or bronze zinc)
Deluxe Wall (brass)
Liners: Concrete Liner
Mountain View Vault
Vault Installation
Double Depth
Urn Encasement
Urn Encasement
$150.00
$250.00
$250.00
$795.00 + tax
$1,495 $1,695.00 + tax
$595.00 + tax
$895.00 $995.00 + tax
$250.00
$300.00 + tax
Forestwalk Informal Cremation Garden
Phase I: Single 3’ Single Ground Plot
Phase I: Double 4’ Plots
Phase II: Double 4’ Double Ground Plot
Wishing Well Scattering
Granite Memorials Start At
$1,495.00
$2,295.00
$2,195.00$2,295.00 -
$3,995.00
$295.00
$395.00 + tax
Page 84 of 244
Page 29
H. PARKS, ARTS AND RECREATION (Per Resolution No. 3797 and amended by Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No. 4117, Resolution
No. 4272, Resolution No. 4424, Ordinance No. 6276, Resolution No. 4552, Resolution No. 4880, Resolution No. 5016, Resolution No.
5181, Resolution No. 5228, and Resolution No. 5255, and Resolution No. 5319.)
LES GOVE MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING Resident Non-Resident
3 hour minimum
Monday – Sunday Seven days a week 9
a.m. - 11 p.m.
$20$60.00/hour
Per 3 hr block
$25$75.00/hour
Per 3 hr block
LES GOVE GYMNASIUM Resident Non-Resident Auburn
Non-Profit
Other
Non-Profit
Gymnasium (athletics practice, birthday
parties, etc.)
$30$45.00/hour
+ Hourly Facility
Attendant Fee
When Required
$40$55.00/hour
+ Hourly Facility
Attendant Fee
When Required
$35.00/hour $45.00/hour
Gymnasium (tournaments, trade shows,
fairs, etc.)
$6075.00/hour
+ Hourly Facility
Attendant Fee
When Required
$7590.00/hour
+ Hourly Facility
Attendant Fee
When Required
$60.00/hour $75.00/hour
Damage Deposit $300.00 $300.00 $300 $300
Optional Cleaning Fee $275.00 $275.00 $275 $275
SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER Resident Non-Resident Auburn
Non-Profit
Other
Non-Profit
Full Facility Millennium Room
(includes basic kitchen use)
Available Friday evenings, Saturday and
Sunday. Tables and chairs for up to 200
people max. 3 hr. minimum, 5:30-11 p.m.
(Friday eve.); 5 hr. minimum, 9 a.m.-11
p.m.(weekend) Additional cleanup time is
available after 11 p.m.
$80.00/hour $100.00/hour $60.00/hour $80.00/hour
Page 85 of 244
Page 30
Full Facility Rental Package Friday night &
Saturday: 4 hours Friday and up to 12 hours
of active use on Saturday
$1,200.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $1,200.00
Full Facility Rental Package Full Day
Saturday or Full Day Sunday: up to 12 hours
of active use on either day
$1,000.00 $1,300.00 $750.00 $1,000.00
1/3 Millennium Rooms
Friday only, 3 hour minimum, 5:30 - 11 p.m.,
63 people per room maximum, 3 rooms
available; weekend options available within
60 days or less
$45.00/hour
$55.00/hour
$35.00/hour $45.00/hour
Lions & Rotary Rooms
Monday – Friday, 2 hour minimum, 5:30 - 11
p.m., 40 people per room maximum;
weekend options available within 60 days or
less
$20$35.00/hourwee
kdays
$35.00/hour
weekends
$25$45.00/hour
weekdays
$45.00/hour
weekends
$25.00/hour $35.00/hour
*Additional Cleanup time available 11:00
p.m. – midnight
$80.00 $100.00 $60.00 $80.00
Damage & Cleaning Deposit (for Full Facility
and Millennium room rentals) without alcohol
$300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00
Damage & Cleaning Deposit (for Full Facility
and Millennium room rentals) with alcohol
($1,000,000.00 excess liability insurance
required)
$500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
Optional cleaning fee (fee required with use
of alcohol in facility)
$275.00 $275.00 $275.00 $275.00
Commercial kitchen Kitchen added on to
existing with room rental.
$50.00$20.00 (1-4
hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$50.00$20.00 (1-4
hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$20.00 (1-4 hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$20.00 (1-4 hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
Use of dishes, tableware, pots, etc. added
on to an existing room rental.
$50.00
$50.00
Commercial kitchen and cookware during
Senior Center operating hours.
$15/hour
$20/hour
Page 86 of 244
Page 31
Commercial kitchen and cookware when
Senior Center is closed (3 hour minimum)
$25/hour
$25/hour
Basic Kitchen – Private and Commercial
Use
$205.00/hour $25.00/hour $20.00/hour $25.00/hour
AUBURN COMMUNITY & EVENT CENTER Resident Non-Resident Auburn
Non-Profit
Other
Non-Profit
Full Community Room $120.00/hour $150.00/hour $90.00/hour $120.00/hour
2/3 Rooms of Full Community Room $90.00/hour $120.00/hour $70.00/hour $90.00/hour
1/3 Room of Full Community Room $60.00/hour $80.00/hour $45.00/hour $60.00/hour
Full Community Room (up to 12 hours) $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $1,200.00
ClassroomClassroom $20.00/hour $25.00/hour $15.00/hour $20.00/hour
Kitchen (No residency requirement) with
room rental.
$50.00$20.00 (1-4
hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$50.00$20.00 (1-4
hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$20.00 (1-4 hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
$20.00 (1-4 hours)
$80.00 (5-12 hours)
Kitchen – Private and Commercial Use $20.00/hour $25/hour $20.00/hour $25.00/hour
Damage & Cleaning Deposit for Full Facility
without alcohol
$300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00
Damage & Cleaning Deposit for Full Facility
with alcohol ($1,000,000.00 excess liability
insurance required)
$500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
Optional cleaning fee (fee required with use
of alcohol in facility)
$275.00 $275.00 $275.00$275.00 $275.00$275.00
THE RECEC $90.00 per hour $120.00 per hour $70.00 per hour $90.00 per hour
Full Facility (Includes Rec Room & Lobby) $90.00/hour $120.00/ hour $70.00/ hour $90.00/ hour
Rec Room $60.00/hour $75.00/hour $45.00/hour $60.00/hour
Page 87 of 244
Page 32
WILLIAM C. WARREN BUILDING Resident Non-Resident
$40.00/hour $50.00/hour
BACKYARD IDEA GARDEN $60.00/Half Day $75.00/Half Day
$100.00/Full Day $125.00/Full Day
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL/GRASS FIELDS
(Reservations made in 1.5 hour increments)
Resident Non-Resident
Youth $107.00/1.5 hour $1310.00/1.5
hour
Adult $2315.00/1.5 hour $320.00/1.5 hour
Field Lights $320.00/1.5 hour $320.00/1.5 hour
Field Maintenance $30.00 per field $30.00 per field
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL/ FASTPITCH TOURNAMENTS
(Reservations made for 1 or 2 day tournaments)
1 Day 2 Day
Youth $700.00 $1,000.00
Adult $900.00 $1,300.00
Field Lights $320.00/1.5 hour $320.00/1.5 hour
SYNTHETIC TURF FIELDS
(Reservations made in 1.5 hour increments)
Resident Non-Resident
Youth $4530.00/1.5 hour $6040.00/1.5
hour
Adult $640.00/1.5 hour $750.00/1.5 hour
Field Lights $320.00/1.5 hour $320.00/1.5 hour
GAME FARM WILDERNESS PARK CAMPGROUNDS Resident Non-Resident
Daily, Open year round
7 nights maximum
$25.00/night $25.00/night
GAME FARM WILDERNESS PARK DAY CAMP Area Resident/
Non-Resident
Non-Profit
April 1 - October 15
Minimum Rental: 1 day
$75.00/day $50.00/day
PICNIC SHELTERS Auburn Rresidents Non-Residents
GAME FARM PARK Half Day* Full Day* Half Day* Full Day*
Single quadrant (max: 25)
Monday – Friday $30.00 $50.00 $40.00 $65.00
Saturday - Sunday N/A N/A N/A N/A
Full day
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 1-99 $120.00 $200.00 $150.00 $250.00
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 100-199 $180.00 $300.00 $225.00 $375.00
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 200+ (must also
rent amphitheater)
N/A $375.00 N/A $475.00
Amphitheater $75.00 $125.00 $100.00 $175.00
ISAAC EVANS PARK $60.00 $100.00 $75.00 $125.00
Page 88 of 244
Page 33
LEA HILL PARK $60.00 $100.00 $75.00 $125.00
ROEGNER PARK $60.00 $100.00 $75.00 $125.00
GAME FARM WILDERNESS PARK $60.00 $100.00 $75.00 $125.00
LES GOVE PARK $60.00 $100.00 $75.00 $125.00
SUNSET PARK
Mon-Sun Single Quadrant (max: 25) $30.00 $50.00 $40.00 $65.00
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 1-99 $120.00 $200.00 $150.00 $250.00
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 100-199 $180.00 $300.00 $225.00 $375.00
Mon-Sun (Full Shelter) 200+ NA $375.00 NA $475.00
PLAZA PARK * Resident Group Non-Resident Group
Hourly rate $60.00 $75.00
Full day rate $360.00 $450.00
* Additional hourly fees may be applied based on event/staffing needs
Rental Rate Schedule forAUBURN AVE
THEATER
Resident Non-Resident
Weekdays Mon-Thur $170.00 $215.00
Weekend Days (Fri., Sat., and Sun.) $270.00 $340.00
Rate Schedule considers one day to be an 8 hour block of time.
Damage deposit. The terms and conditions for
full or partial refund of deposit apply to approval
of Check-Out List, including theater, equipment
plot restoration.
$300.00 $300.00
Hourly commercial rate for meetings
2 hour min. for “4-wal” only of lobby, auditorium,
and stage
$35.00/hour $45.00/hour
Equipment not included: Use of any theatrical
equipment additional charge
$35.00/hour $45.00/hour
$1,000,000 excess liability insurance required Upon request Upon request
Custodial Fee $130.00 $130.00
Sound & Light Technician $30.00/hour $3530.00/hour
Stage Hand $15.00/hour $15.00/hour
Rental Rate Schedule for Commercial Filming Resident Non-Resident
Permit Fee $50.00
Still Photography/Training and Industrial Films, etc $50.00 per 1/2 day $100.00 per day
Broadcast, Film, TV, Commercial, etc. $75.00 per 1/2 day $150.00 per day
Electricity/Water Access, Park Maintenance
Staff, Vehicle Access
Hourly staff cost
Damage Deposit $100.00
Impact Fees:
Park Impact Fees $3,500.00 per residential dwelling unit
Page 89 of 244
Page 34
I. MULTIMEDIA DUPLICATION (Per Resolution No. 3953 and Resolution No. 4552.)
Product Cost
DVD Copy $10.00 per disk
CD Copy $5.00 per disk
Page 90 of 244
Page 35
J. INFORMATION SERVICES AND GIS 16 (Per Resolution No. 4272, Ordinance 6276,
Resolution No. 4552, and Resolution No.4593 .) Much of the City’s geographic data is available
for sale per the prices below plus Washington State sales tax. A signed public records request
form is required. Most public records requests can be completed within seven to ten business
days and will be delivered in ESRI Shapefile format without Metadata.
Product Cost
Maps
Existing Map
Custom Maps (any non-existing map)
$5.00 + tax
$50.00 per hour 17 + tax
Data
Digital Data Requests
$50.00 per hour 18 + tax
Miscellaneous
CD-Rom
All other requests for data or information not specifically
listed
$5.00 + tax
$50.00 per hour + tax
16 Hourly charge to complete any of the below (one hour minimum charge).
17 Hourly charge includes the cost of processing and providing custom map requests.
18 Hourly charge includes the cost of processing and providing digital data requests.
Page 91 of 244
Page 36
K. WAIVER OF FEES (Per Resolution No. 5181).
1. The Mayor is authorized to waive any fees for permits, licenses, publications and
actions as authorized by Sections 2.03.030, 5.10.030 and 12.60.020 of the City Code.
2. The Mayor is also authorized to reduce, and is vested with to discretion to reduce
in compelling cases, by up to 50% any fees for permits, publications and actions where the
applicant – the party responsible for payment of such fees – is an organization exempt from
taxation under 26 US 501(c)(3), and where the permit(s), publication(s) and/or action(s) relate
directly to the provision of charitable services to residents of the City of Auburn. Charitable
services are defined as events or services provided to the residents of Auburn free of charge and
where the City is a sponsor of the specific event or service. For the purposes hereof, “compelling
cases” mean instances where there is an extraordinary need (greatly beyond current and ordinary
need) for the charitable services that would be able to be provided. The intent of this authorization
is to empower the Mayor with sole discretion to waive some fees in unique situations where there
is a greatly increased need for new charitable services to be provided, and where the reduction
of fees to the City will not detrimentally impact the City’s ability to provide municipal services. This
waiver does not include Impact Fees, System Development Charges, any fees related to
Franchise or Public Way Agreements, Right-of-way Vacations, Right-of-Way Use Permits, Facility
Extensions, Police Department Fees, Animal Licensing Fees and Penalties, Banner Permit Fees,
or Cemetery or Parks fees.
Page 92 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Traf fic Impact Fee Update (10 Minutes) (Snyder)
Date:
November 7, 2017
Department:
CD & PW
Attachments:
Traffic Impact Fee Memo 2018
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Discuss the recommended update to the transportation impact fee program f or 2018.
Background Summary:
Present the proposed 2018 update to the transportation impact f ee, including changes to the
project list and associated costs, changes in the number of growth trips, and a comparison
with other jurisdictions.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Numb er:
Page 93 of 244
Memorandum
TO: City Council, Mayor Backus
FROM: Community Development and Public Works
RE: DRAFT 2018 Transportation Impact Fee Update
DATE: November 1, 2017
The Community Development and Public Works Department is recommending an update to the
Transportation Impact Fee program, to be consistent with the projects funding needs identified
in the adopted 2018-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to present staff’s recommendation for updating the
Transportation Impact Fee program. The most recent update to the City’s transportation impact
fee occurred on January 1, 2017, and was based on the previous 2017-2022 TIP.
Transportation impact fees are updated annually to stay current with the need to fund road
capacity projects identified in the recently adopted 2018-2023 TIP. The update accounts for
changes to the project list, updated funding needs, and the portion of each projects cost which
is attributable to new development. The update also accounts for revised growth forecasts
developed as part of the 2015 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update. These changes will
ensure that the collection of impact fees is consistent with the road capacity projects identified in
the current TIP.
Impact Fee Project List Changes
Not all of the projects included in the TIP are included in the impact fee program. Only projects
which increase vehicular capacity at intersections and along roadway segments are eligible to
be included in the impact fee program. A list of the projects included in the impact fee
calculations is included as an attachment to this memo.
The majority of the projects included in the impact fee are the same as last year, but have been
updated to reflect current funding needs. Eight projects have been removed from the list
because they have been completed, they are no longer funded by impact fees, they have been
combined with other projects, or they have moved beyond year six in the current TIP, and one
new project has been added based on identified capacity needs.
Impact Fee Project Cost Changes
Table 1 summarizes the total cost for the capacity projects which are included in the traffic
impact fee program and the portion of this total cost which the traffic impact fee actually funds
Page 94 of 244
(unfunded growth costs). The table also provides a comparison of the cost basis for the
previous (2015 and 2016), current (2017), and proposed updates (2018).
Table 1. Impact Fee Project Cost Comparison
Year Total Eligible Cost Unfunded Growth Cost
2015 $99,549,000 $62,252,032
2016 $104,425,000 $61,985,000
2017 $103,622,000 $65,083,309
2018 $107,666,000 $67,123,000
As shown in the table, the total cost for the capacity projects has increase slightly relative to
previous years. Consistent with that, the unfunded impact fee portion of the costs has also
increased. The level of service analysis used to determine the existing deficiency potion and
future growth portion of each project was updated based on the most recent count data
collected by the City.
Citywide Growth Trips
The proposed 2018 update is based on the number of growth trips forecast from the recent
model update completed as part of the 2015 comprehensive transportation plan update. This
reflects current growth projections to 2035 of 16,100 trips
Proposed Citywide Transportation Impact Fees
The current cost per new PM Peak hour trip in the transportation impact fee rate schedule is
$3,823.76. The changes identified above increase the impact fee per weekday PM peak hour
trip by $65.86 to a total of $3,889.62. The increase, approximately 2 percent, is attributable to
the current amount of funding being sought through the impact fee program. This fee is
applicable to all new uses citywide except in Lakeland Hills and the Downtown Urban Center
(DUC) zone as described below.
Downtown Urban Center Zone Rate
In an effort to acknowledge the trip generation characteristics of the downtown urban center, the
City added a second zone to the transportation impact fee program. The program charges
reduced impact fees for development occurring in the downtown urban center. The applicable
downtown area in which fees are reduced is shown in Figure 1.
Reduced impact fees for the downtown urban center account for anticipated reduced trip
generation resulting from the availability of transit service (both bus and rail), the completeness
of non-motorized facilities, and the close proximity of complementary land-uses (retail,
commercial, medical, etc.). This provides a better nexus between transportation impact fees and
the impacts of development in the downtown urban center.
The following reductions are used for each land use category in the downtown urban center:
Residential, Lodging, and Medical -19%
Recreation, Institutional, Retail, and Service -26%
Office -32%
Citywide and separate Downtown Transportation Impact fee rates are shown in Table 2.
National and local data was used to estimate the reductions for downtown land-uses in Auburn.
Page 95 of 244
This approach is consistent with other local jurisdictions, including the City’s of Federal Way and
Kent.
Lakeland Hills Rate
Transportation mitigation fees for Lakeland Hills were established in 1998 by Resolution 2955.
At that time the initial impact fees were identified for detached single-family units, attached
single-family and multi-family units, senior family residential units, and commercial and retail
space. The fees are updated annually based on the Consumer Price Index for the Seattle-
Metropolitan area. The most recent annual data shows that during the previous 12 month
period, prices have increased by 2.6 percent.
TIF Comparison by Agency
Included in your packet is a comparison of the basic transportation impact fee for 60 Western
Washington Cities and 5 Counties. The comparison shows that Auburns current fee is about
average. Even with the increase proposed for next year, our fee would remain similar to Federal
Way, and lower than Puyallup, Covington, Kent, Bonney Lake, and Maple Valley.
Page 96 of 244
VETERANSMEMORIALPARK
AUBURNENVIRONMENTALPARK
BICENTENNIALPARK
STREETMALL
BSTREETPLAZA
AUBURN
HIGH
SCHOOL
WEST
AUBURN
HIGH
SCHOOL WASHINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
MESSIAH
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
SCHOOL
S R 1 8
W MAIN ST
E MAIN ST
2ND ST SEASTSE 4TH ST N E
FSTSE4TH ST SEESTNE JSTNECSTNWISTSEDSTSEJSTSEHSTNW2ND ST NE
ESTSEHSTSEGSTSE5TH ST SEDSTNEDSTNW3RDSTNECSTSWCLAYSTNW2NDSTNWASTNWASTSWAUBURNAVENEAUBURNWAYNDSTSWFSTSWESTSW1STSTNESDIVISIONST3RDSTNWGSTSWBSTNEASTNE1STSTSW
5TH ST NE
3RD ST SW
4TH ST SW
6TH ST SENDIVISIONSTFSTNWGSTNWWESTERNAVENWCROSSSTSEAUBURNWAYSHSTNE2NDSTSW
1ST ST NW
PARK AVE NE
TRANSITRDSW5TH ST SW
1ST ST SE
3RD ST SEBSTSWBSTNW ISTNE5TH ST NW
BSTSE2ND ST NW
S R 1 8SR18
HSTSE3RD ST NE
3RD ST SW
1ST ST NE
SR 18BSTNE1STSTSW
3 R D S T S W
DSTSEASTNEASTSW1ST ST NE
SR 18
FSTSE1ST ST SW
4THSTSW
M ap ID :1271PrintedOn:0 8/16/20 10
Auburn Downtown Map
Figure 1 U rban Center B o undary (2 3 1.3 4 Acres)
Auburn C ity Limits1INCH=40 0 FEET
IN FO R M AT IO N SH O W N IS FO R GEN ER AL
R EFER EN C E PU R PO SES O N LY AN D DO ES N O T
N EC ESSAR ILY R EPR ESEN T EXACT GEO GR APH I C
O R CART O GR APH IC DATA AS M APPED .T H E C IT Y O F
AU BU R N M AKES N O W AR R AN T Y AS T O IT S ACC U R ACY.
¬SR167SR 18
ASTSECSTSWBSTNWAUBU
RN
W
AY
SISTNEMSTSEAUBURNWAYN51STAVES124THAVESEWESTVALLEYHWYN132NDAVESE
RSTSE112THAVESEKERSEY
WAYSE
8TH ST NE
37TH STNW
LAKELANDHI
LLSWAYSEDSTNWS 316TH ST
EASTVALLEYHWYSEAUBURN-BLACKDIAMONDRD SE
ELLINGSON RD SW
SE 281STST
OSTSW17TH ST SE 124THAVESEASTSESR 18Page 97 of 244
Page 1
B. ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS FEES
1. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule: (Per Ordinance No. 5763 as amended by
Resolution No. 3953, Ordinance No. 6005, Resolution No. 4103, Resolution No. 4424, Resolution
4964, Resolution No. 5114, Resolution No. 5181 and Resolution No. 5255.)
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Industrial
General Light
Industrial 110 sf/gfa 0.97 $7.888.02 -
General Heavy
Industrial 120 sf/gfa 0.68 $6.196.30 -
Industrial Park 130 sf/gfa 0.85 $6.917.03 -
Manufacturing 140 sf/gfa 0.73 $3.563.62 -
Warehousing 150 sf/gfa 0.32 $3.643.70 -
Mini-
Warehouse/Storage 151 sf/gfa 0.26 $1.941.98 -
Residential
Single-Family
(detached) 210 du 1.00 $4,459.894,537.89 $3,612.513,675.
69
Multi-Family 220-233 du 0.62 $2,923.142,974.26 $2,367.742,409.
15
Mobile Home 240 du 0.59 $2,105.072,141.88 -
Senior Housing 251, 252 du 0.27 $963.34980.18 $780.30793.95
Lodging
Hotel 310 room 0.60 $3,058.213,111.69 $2,477.152,520.
47
Motel 320 room 0.47 $2,395.602,437.49 -
Recreational
Movie Theater 444, 445 seat 0.08 $199.29202.78 $147.48150.06
Health Club 492, 493 sf/gfa 3.53 $10.4610.64 $7.747.88
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Institutional
Elementary School 520 student 0.15 $259.95264.49 $192.36195.73
Middle School/Jr.
High 522 student 0.16 $440.38448.08 $325.88331.58
High School 530 student 0.13 $490.33498.91 $362.85369.19
Church 560 sf/gfa 0.55 $2.592.64 $1.921.95
Day Care Center 565 sf/gfa 12.34 $23.5924.00 $17.4517.76
Library 590 sf/gfa 7.30 $11.8612.07 $8.788.93
Medical
Hospital 610 sf/gfa 0.93 $4.744.82 $3.843.91
Page 98 of 244
Page 2
Asst. Living, Nursing
Home 254, 620 bed 0.22 $784.94798.67 -
Office
General Office 710,
715, 750 sf/gfa 1.49 $8.728.87 $5.936.03
Medical Office 720 sf/gfa 3.57 $16.3816.66 $11.1411.33
Post Office 732 sf/gfa 11.22 $18.2318.55 $12.4012.61
Retail
Free Standing
Discount Superstore 813 sf/gla 4.35 $8.388.53 $6.206.31
Free Standing
Discount Store 815 sf/gla 4.98 $11.0611.26 $8.198.33
Hardware/Paint Store 816 sf/gla 4.84 $7.767.90 $5.745.84
Shopping Center 820 sf/gla 3.71 $6.556.67 $4.854.93
Car Sales – New 841 sf/gla 2.59 $12.1512.36 $8.999.14
Car Sales – Used N/A space 0.28 $1,312.991,355.95 $971.61988.61
Automobile Parts
Sales 843 sf/gla 5.98 $7.387.51 $5.465.56
Tire Store 848 sf/gla 4.15 $8.388.52 $6.206.31
Supermarket 850 sf/gla 9.48 $16.2416.52 $12.0112.22
Convenience Market 851 sf/gla 52.41 $33.8634.45 $25.0625.49
Home Improvement
Store 862 sf/gla 2.33 $3.243.30 $2.402.44
Drugstore w/o Drive-
Through 880 sf/gla 8.40 $8.558.70 $6.336.44
Drugstore w/ Drive-
Through 881 sf/gla 9.91 $10.9511.14 $8.108.24
Furniture Store 890 sf/gla 0.45 $0.460.47 $0.340.35
Land Use
ITE
Land
Use
Code
Independent
Variable
Trip
Rate
Non-Downtown
Fee Rate
Downtown Fee
Rate
Services
Drive-in Bank 912 sf/gfa 24.30 $24.6225.05 $18.2218.54
Quality Restaurant 931 sf/gfa 7.49 $18.1718.49 $13.4513.68
High Turnover
Restaurant 932 sf/gfa 9.85 $16.4616.74 $12.1812.39
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive-Through 933 sf/gfa 26.15 $33.9934.58 $25.1525.59
Fast Food Restaurant
w/ Drive-Through 934 sf/gfa 32.65 $42.4443.18 $31.4031.95
Espresso Stand w/
Drive-Through 938 sf/gfa 75.00 $32.4933.06 $24.0524.47
Auto Care Center 942 sf/gfa 3.11 $6.106.21 $4.524.60
Page 99 of 244
Page 3
Service Station 944 vfp 13.87 $17,426.4517,731.
23
$12,895.5813,12
1.11
Service Station w/
Mini-Mart 945 vfp 13.51 $12,876.9413,102.
15
$9,528.939,695.
59
Lakeland PUD (Per Ordinance No. 4867 as amended by Resolution No. 2955, Ordinance
No. 6176 and Resolution No. 5181.)
Detached Single-
Family Residential
Unit
N/A du n/a $1,273.931,307.06 -
Attached Single-
Family/Multi-Family
Unit
N/A du n/a $826.87848.37 -
Senior-Family Unit N/A du n/a $284.14291.53 -
Commercial/Retail
Units N/A sf/gfa n/a $3.313.39 -
Administrative Fee for Independent Fee Calculation $200.00
Notes:
A. Basic trip rates are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition.
B. Impact fee rate calculation is based upon the following methodology:
– Basic Trip Rate = PM Peak Hour Trip Generation (per unit of measure)
– Basic Trip Rate x Percent of New Trips x Trip Length Adjustment x Per Trip Fee/(divide
by) 1,000 for rate per square foot (where applicable) = Impact Fee Rate (per unit of measure)
C. For land uses not specifically identified here, trip generation rates could be derived from ITE
or a special study by the applicant.
D. sf/GFA= Square feet Gross Floor Area; sf/GLA= Square Feet Gross Leasable Area;
VFP=Vehicle Fueling Position.
E. Projects eligible for the Downtown Fee Rate are those located entirely within the boundary
identified on Figure 1.
Page 100 of 244
Traffic Impact Fee Project List
Ongoing TIP Projects to remain on the Transportation Impact Fee List
- TIP #1: A Street NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW)
- TIP #4: I Street NE Corridor (45th St NE to S 277th St)
- TIP #5: M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE)
- TIP #8: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW)
- TIP #9: Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements (Hemlock to Poplar)
- TIP #10: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Downtown to Les Gove)
- TIP #11: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE)
- TIP #12: BNSF Railyard Grade Separation
- TIP #15: 8th St NE Widening (Pike St NE to R St NE)
- TIP #16: 49th Street NE (Auburn Way N to M St SE)
- TIP #17: Harvey Rd NE/8th Street NE Intersection Improvements
- TIP #25: 46th Place S Realignment
- TIP #29: S 277th Street Environmental Monitoring
- TIP #38: C St SW & 15th St SW Intersection Improvements
- TIP #39: 124th Ave SE/SE 320th St Intersection Improvements
- TIP #40: 124th Ave SE Corridor, Phase 2
- TIP #41: R Street Bypass (M St SE to SR-18)
- TIP #42: SE 320th Corridor Improvements
- TIP #45: 124th Ave SE & SE 284th St Intersection Safety Improvements
- TIP #49: West Valley Highway Improvements
- TIP #51: Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion
- TIP #52: A St SE & Lakeland Hills Way Intersection Safety & Capacity Improvements
- TIP #53: AWS/12th Street Intersection Improvements
- TIP #54: Kersey Way Study
- TIP #56: Evergreen Heights SRTS
- TIP #59: Auburn Regional Growth Center Access
- TIP #60: M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to AWS)
- TIP #63: 29th St SE/R Street SE Intersection Improvements
- TIP #64: Lea Hill Road Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl S)
- TIP #65: Lea Hill Road Segment 2 (105th Pl S to 112th Ave SE)
- TIP #66: Lea Hill Road Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE)
- TIP #72: West Valley Hwy Improvements
New TIP Projects to be added to the Transportation Impact Fee List
- TIP #6: A Street Loop
TIP Projects removed from the Transportation Impact Fee List
- TIP #6: S 277th Street Corridor
- TIP #13: Mohawk Plastics Site Mitigation
- TIP #14: M Street/12th Street Signal (combined with TIP #60)
- TIP #43: Auburn Way South Corridor Safety Improvements
- TIP #55: Auburn Way S Sidewalk
- TIP #67: A St SE Pedestrian Crossing Improvements
- TIP #69: I Street NE/22nd Street NE Roundabout
- TIP #74: R Street Extension
Page 101 of 244
$363
$515
$589
$603
$755
$900
$948
$1,008
$1,165
$1,244
$1,321
$1,436
$1,573
$1,742
$1,770
$1,875
$1,924
$2,017
$2,026
$2,102
$2,111
$2,149
$2,192
$2,195
$2,244
$2,334
$2,400
$2,407
$2,453
$2,476
$2,500
$2,606
$2,665
$2,761
$2,800
$2,822
$2,835
$2,919
$3,000
$3,000
$3,051
$3,199
$3,239
$3,355
$3,416
$3,432
$3,459
$3,498
$3,499
$3,500
$3,705
$3,822
$3,875
$3,956
$3,986
$3,995
$4,153
$4,350
$4,413
$4,461
$4,471
$4,500
$4,500
$4,561
$4,632
$4,989
$5,151
$6,300
$6,413
$6,475
$6,650
$6,941
$7,224
$7,291
$7,944
$8,183
$8,348
$9,320
$10,563
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000
Clark County
Kitsap County
Oak Harbor
Carnation
Blaine
Anacortes
Burien
Bham UV Max 50%
Sumner
Tukwila
Yelm
Snohomish
Bham Urban Villages
Pierce County
Vancouver
Mukilteo
Lacey
Bellingham
Milton
Gig Harbor
Lynden
Orting
Washougal
Stanwood
Sequim
Thurston County
Everett
Sedro Wooley
Snohomish County
Lake Stevens
Granite Falls
Shelton
Burlington
Woodinville
Renton
Ridgefield
Poulsbo
Battleground
Ferndale
Mill Creek
Camas
University Place
Enumclaw
Arlington
Tumwater
Mount Lake Terrace
Monroe
Olympia
WA Average TIF
SeaTac
Kirkland
Auburn
Federal Way
Mercer Island
Maple Valley
Bonney Lake
Buckley
Sultan
Edgewood
Covington
Kent
La Center
Puyallup
Edmonds
Bainbridge Island
Bellevue
Des Moines
Marysville
Fife
Newcastle
Redmond
Bothell
Shoreline
Mount Vernon
Lynnwood
Duvall
Issaquah
Kenmore
North Bend
Chart TitleComparison of 2017-2018 TIF Base Rates in 72* Cities and 5 Counties in Western Washington
With Whatcom County Cities and Bellingham's Urban Village TIF Reductions Highlighted for Emphasis
[*City of Sammamish, WA $14,707 TIF base rate excluded from graphic due to size -see TIF rate table on next page]
Data compiled October 2017 by Chris Comeau, AICP-CTP, Transportation Planner, Bellingham Public Works ccomeau@cob.org or (360) 778-7946
Cost Per P.M. Peak Hour (4:00 -6:00pm) Vehicle Trip
Page 102 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
2018 VRFA Fee Schedule Update (10 Minutes) (Snyder)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
Community Development &
Public Works
Attachments:
Item A - VRFA 2018 Propos ed Fee Schedule
Summary
Item B - 2008 Strikeout 2018 Fee Schedule
Item C - 2018 Fee Schedule
Item D - VRFA Fee Schedule Comparis on
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Background Summary:
The Valley Regional Fire Authority (VRFA) was established in 2007 under RCW 52.26 as a
Fire Authority that serves the cities of Auburn, Algona, and Pacif ic. As a Fire Authority VRFA
operates as a separate municipal corporation, with independent taxing authority, and within an
independent taxing district.
While VRFA is a separate Fire Authority and is organizationally independent f rom the City of
Auburn, VRFA continues to have a role in reviewing development proposals and conducting
inspections during the construction process. Within VRFA it is the Fire Marshal’s Of f ice that
perf orms these functions.
While VRFA has taxing authority within its jurisdictional boundary, tax payers do not fund all
services of f ered by VRFA. I n some instances there are f ees charged to customers who are
seeking direct service, e.g. a permit to construct a commercial building. I n other words,
permit customers pay a substantial portion of the direct service they are seeking, as opposed
to the service being subsidized across the taxing district. Stated in yet another way, a
residential tax payer who pays a portion of their property taxes to VRFA is generally not
providing a significant level monetary contribution to a commercial real estate proposal or a
new residential subdivision.
Since the Fire Authority was established in 2007, VRFA has collected f ees for reviewing
development plans and conducting construction inspections. In Auburn, VRFA fees are
collected by the City and distributed to VRFA. This practice was put in place in order to
ensure that Auburn could achieve a one-stop permitting shop. Instead of sending customers
to a VRFA office to pay fees and apply for separate f ire permits, customers can submit, pay
and pick up permits at the City’s Permit Center. More times than not, the customer never
knows that they are interacting with, and paying, separate governmental entities.
Since 2008, VRFA’s fees have remained unchanged. VRFA has begun a conversation with
their Governance Board about modifying their fee schedule to make it more current. The
Governance Board is comprised of the Mayor’s of Auburn, Algona, and Pacif ic as well as two
councilmembers f rom each City (Councilmember Peloza and Councilmember DaCorsi).
Page 103 of 244
While VRFA is a separate agency, with a separate Governance Board that has authority to
establish its own service f ees, the Auburn City Council has a role in endorsing f ees that are
collected by the City and distributed to other agencies (similar to Council’s role in reviewing
school district f ees and taking action to authorize the collection of these external agency
f ees). Typically, City Council would provide this endorsement through action of a Resolution
which then enables procedural efforts to occur that f acilitate collection of the relevant f ees
and fee types.
The materials attached to this memo have been prepared by VRFA. Representatives from
VRFA will be present during the November 13, 2017 Study Session discussion. They will
present the proposal and be available to answer questions.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 104 of 244
Valley Regional Fire Authority 2018 Proposed Fee Schedule
Summary Document
The VRFA 2018 proposed fee schedule is a responsible and accurate calculation that represents the true
cost of providing Fire Marshal Office services, Fire Ambulance transports, and Public Disclosure Request
processing. VRFA added fees for public disclosure requests as outlined in RCW70.020.010 and WAC 246-
08-400, and the updated base fee for ambulance transports and mileage charges. The VRFA Fire Marshal
used the information in the NFPA 1730 Standard, as the formula for both calculating the hourly cost of
an employee, and as a guide to evaluate how many hours it takes to perform each task, to arrive at the
fee amounts listed in the revised schedule. We believe using an hourly rate model, as opposed to a
valuation model, more accurately captures the recovery cost for our work and is more equitable and fair
to our customers. Many of the services provided by the VRFA Fire Marshal’s Office are covered under
the fire service benefit charge, including all fire and life safety inspections. The fee schedule does not
recover the cost to perform all work but is the basis for how we charge to recover a portion of our costs.
In comparison to other like agencies the VRFA fees are similar to other fire departments. Many other
jurisdictions in the area use “valuation” as the basis for their fees. As stated above, we believe that an
hourly rate model better represents what it cost to complete the work and doesn’t unnecessarily charge
higher rates for more costly projects. The VRFA residences and businesses in the VRFA service area pay
the Fire Benefit Charge which provides for VRFA services. The VRFA does not feel that the Fire Benefit
Charge should subsidize developers and business owners who require Fire Marshal Office services to
improve or develop buildings and land in our service area.
In conclusion, we feel that the revised fee schedule accurately calculates fees based on our current
operations. In addition, we feel the calculations used are responsible and compare well with like
agencies in our area and the three cities we serve. Lastly, now that the new structure for the fee
schedule is in place, we think that once approved it will only be necessary to consider inflationary
adjustments in the foreseeable future.
Page 105 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY FEE SCHEDULE
All fees are Effective January 1, 2008 2018 and will remain in effect unless
amended by the VRFA Board of Governance.
ACTIVITY FEE
1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT REVIEW (INCLUDING INITIAL INSPECTION)
1
1.1
Commercial review from jurisdictional Building
Departments Occupancy Review
35% of Jurisdictional Fee1
2
1.2
Multi-Family occupancy review (R2) 20% of Jurisdictional Fee1
1.3 Other permit Fees (mechanical, plumbing,
etc…)
$2163
3
1.5
Single Family occupancy review (R3) 15% of Jurisdictional Fee2
4
1.4
Revisions to previously reviewed plans $59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3 $2163
5 Civil review (Hydrant placement, Fire flow, Fire
Department Access) (moved to 2.2)
$59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3$216.00 3
2 LAND USE REVIEWS
6
2.5
SEPA review $59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3$2163
7
2.3
Preliminary Plat and plat reviews
(subdivisions)
$59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3$2163
8
2.6
Short Plat review $59.003 $2163
9
2.1
Lot line adjustment review Boundary Line
Adjustment
$59.003 $1083
10
2.7
Variances $59.003 $1083
11
2.8
Water availability reviews $59.003 $1083
2.2 Civil Reviews (hydrant placement, fire flow,
fire department access, grading)
$59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3 $2163
2.4 Other permit fees (miscellaneous,
administrative, etc…)
$1083
3 FIRE PROTECTION AND OTHER SYSTEMS REVIEW (INCLUDING INITIAL INSPECTION)
(includes plan review and initial 2 inspections)4
12
3.1
Commercial Automatic Fire Protection System
(Fire Sprinkler)
$250.00 base to include first 10 sprinkler heads. $0.75 for
each additional sprinkler head4 $356.00 + $0.75 per
sprinkler head over 10 heads3
13
3.2
Commercial and Residential Automatic Fire
Protection System (Sprinkler Underground
Supply) (WAC 105.7.20)
$250.00 $356.00 per system / building3
14
3.3
Commercial Automatic or Manual Fire Alarm
System
$250.00 base to include first 10 devices. $5.00 for each
additional alarm device4 $356.00 + $5.00 per device over
5 devices3
Page 106 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
15
3.4
Commercial Kitchen Fire Protection Systems See other fire protection systems below $356.00 $0.75
per sprinkler head over 10 heads3
16
3.9
Other Miscellaneous Plan Reviews not listed
(Plan reviews and all other permits not
specifically listed)
$59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3 $3653
17
3.5
Commercial: Other Fire Protection Systems
(Clean agent, FM200, Wet or Dry Chemical,
CO2, or foam, mist, other inert gas, Foam and
other systems)
$200.00 base fee + $0.75 per device $356.00 + $0.75 per
sprinkler head over 10 heads 3
18
3.12
3.13
Spray Booth Installation $150.00
19
3.12
3.13
Spray Booth Fire Protection System See sprinklers above or other fire protection system5
20
4.6
TANKS: Hazardous Materials or Flammable /
Combustible Liquid Installation, Aboveground
and/or Underground
$200.00 per tank
21
4.16
Tents > 200 square feet or Canopies > 400
square feet
$75.00 each
3.6 Emergency Responder Radio Coverage
System (DAS)
$356.00 +$0.75 per device 3
3.7 Fireworks Display Permit $356.00 3
3.8 Fireworks Sales Permit $108.00 3
Activity Fee
3.9 Other Miscellaneous Plan Review not listed $356.00 3
3.10 Over the Counter Permit (fire sprinkler with
less than 10 sprinkler heads, fire alarm with
less than 5 devices)
$178.00 3
3.11 Residential (R3) Fire Sprinkler System $108.00 + $0.75 per device over 10 devices 3
19 Spray Booth Installation
3.12 Spray Booth Fire Protection System $356.00 + $0.75 per device over 10 devices 3
3.13 Spray Booth Fire Alarm System $356.00 + $5.00 per device over 5 devices 3
4 Other Fire Permits (Includes Plan Review and Initial 2 inspections)4
4.1 Battery Systems $648.00 3
4.2 New Business License Review Included with Fire Benefit Charge
4.3 Compressed Gases $648.003
4.4 Cryogenic Fluids $648.003
4.5 Fire Pump & Equipment $648.003
20
4.6
Flammable and Combustible Liquids (including
above ground tanks, below ground tanks, dip
tanks, etc…)
$648.003
4.7 Hazardous Materials Facility $648.003
4.8 Industrial Ovens $648.003
4.9 LP Gas Commercial $648.003
4.10 LP Gas Residential $356.003
4.11 Marijuana Extraction Systems (WAC 105.7.19) $648.003
4.12 Commercial Heating Tank Removal $356.003
4.13 Residential Home Heating Tank Removal $108.003
4.14 Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems, Residential $393.003
4.15 Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems,
Commercial
$648.003
Page 107 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
21
4.16 Temporary Tent/Membrane Structure > 400
square feet
$216.003
27
4.17 Working without a permit or ahead of the
permit
Double the permit and inspection fee
5 INSPECTION FEES
22
5.1
Initial Inspection No Charge6 Included in the permit
fee
23
5.2
1st re-inspection No Charge Included in the permit
fee
24
5.3
2nd re-inspection $59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3
$216 for first 2 hours3
25
5.4
Any subsequent (after 2nd) re-inspection $130.00 per hour (2 hour
minimum)7 $216 for first 2 hours3
5.6 Progressive Inspections (beyond the first 2 inspections) $108.00 per hour (2 hour
minimum)3
26
5.7
Re-inspections (Due to a failure to cancel appointment or work not
ready for inspection at time of appointment)
$150.007
27
4.17 Failure to Obtain Permit Double Fees
28
5.5
After Hour Fee (Outside of normal business hours) $59.00 per hour (2 hour minimum)3
$162.00 per hour (2 hour
minimum)3
5.7 Re-inspection (due to a failure to cancel appointment or work not
ready for inspection at time of appointment)
$108.00 per hour (2 hour
minimum)3
6 Pre-Application Fees
6.1 Pre-Application Fees Included with Fire Benefit Charge
29 Adult Family Home Inspection (Licensed by DSHS) $150.00
8 OTHER FIRE AUTHORITY FEES
30 Fire Code Appeals $520.00
31
8.1
Fire Ambulance Transport Fee $658.00 base rate8
32
8.2
Fire Ambulance Transport Mileage Fee $13.50 per mile8
33 False Alarm Responses: (Within a calendar year)
34
8.3
- Preventable Nuisance or malfunction alarm – 1st and 2nd violation No Penalty9
35
8.4
- Preventable Nuisance or malfunction alarm – 3rd violation $75.009
36
8.5
- Preventable Nuisance or malfunction alarm – 4th and 5th violation 4
or more violations
$150.009
7 Consultant Fees
37
7.1
Rapid Access Key Box, Padlocks and key Switches (Knox
Company)
Call 253-931-3060 for price10
38
7.1
Use of Outside Consultants fro for Plan Review and Inspections, or
both, and Rapid Access Equipment
Actual costs
DOCUMENT FEES
39
9
Photocopies $0.15 per page for letter, legal and 11x17 sizes11
Page 108 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
40
9
Photographs $0.15 per print if copied in-house or actual cost if sent out
for copying11
41
9
Audio Recording $5.00 per CD audio discs
9 Public Records Requests RCW70.020.010 & WAC 246-08-400
Description Rate (effective 01/01/2018)
9.1 General Records – paper copies $0.15 per page
9.2 General Records – electronic copies $0.10 per page + cost of media
9.3 Medical Incident Reports – Clerical Fee $25.00 per report
9.4 Medical Incident Reports – paper copies – Pages
1-30 $1.12 per page
9.5 Medical Incident Reports – paper copies – Pages
31+ $0.84 per page
9.6 Medical Incident Reports – electronic copies $0.10 per page + cost of media
9.7 Records mailed or shipped Actual cost of postage and container
9.8 Video and audio tapes Actual cost to reproduce
10 CLASSES AND TRAINING
42
10.1 Public CPR Certification Training – VRFA Facility $20.00 $25.00 per student12
43 Public CPR Certification Training – Off Site (Private business or
Group requests)
$25.00 per student12
11 OPERATIONAL PERMITS
The International Fire Code 105.6 Required Operational Permits authorizes the fire code official to issue
operational permits for operations listed below.
Permit type Fee
11.1 Aerosol products Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.2 Amusement building Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.3 Aviation facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.4 Carbon dioxide systems Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.5 Carnivals and fairs Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.6 Combustible dust producing operations Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.7 Combustible fibers Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.8 Compressed gases Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.9 Cover and open mall buildings Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.10 Cryogenic fluids Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.11 Cutting and welding Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.12 Dry cleaning Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.13 Exhibits and trade shows Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
Page 109 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
11.14 Explosives Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.15 Flammable and combustible liquids Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.16 Fruit and crop ripening Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.17 Fumigation and insecticidal fogging Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.18 Hazardous materials Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.19 High piled storage Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.20 Hot work operations Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.21 Industrial ovens Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.22 Lumber yards and woodworking plants Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.23 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly
buildings
Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.24 Liquid Petroleum (LP) gas Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.25 Magnesium Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.26 Miscellaneous combustible storage (tires, empty packing cases,
rubber)
Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.27 Motor fuel dispensing facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.28 Organic coatings Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.29 Place of assembly Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.30 Private fire hydrants Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.31 Refrigeration equipment Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.32 Repair garages and motor fuel dispensing facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.33 Spraying or dipping operation using flammable or combustible
liquids or powders
Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.34 Storage of tires, scrap tires, and by-products or rebuilding
plants
Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.35 Temporary membrane structure and tents Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.36 Waste handling Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.37 Wood products Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.38 Commercial kitchens with type I or type II hoods (ACC
10.36A.025)
Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
Explanatory notes:
Page 110 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
1. The VRFA bases its building review on a percentage of the associated juris dictional fee.
Thus, fees may differ between jurisdictions. However, a percentage basis fee eliminates
the need to adjust the VRFA fee schedule for every jurisdictional permitting change. In
addition, the fee structure differences between jurisdictions are minimal, and therefore,
VRFA fees will be materially similar notwithstanding the jurisdiction through which a
building permit is obtained. See 1 below
2. The reduction of the percentage base for single family occupancies is based on the
minimal review time required to determine if a residential occupancy requires compliance
with jurisdictional fire codes. The fee will only apply to residential occupancies that
require automatic fire protection—it does not apply to all residential reviews. See 2 below
3. The hourly rate is based upon the IBC Table 1A hourly structure. This has been codified
within all VRFA cities. See 3 below
4. This fee is codified within the Auburn City Code, and was increased by $50 to reflect
inflationary cost adjustments since its original adoption.
5. Fire protection within a spray booth can either be water based from an existing sprinkler
system, or from an alternative fire protection system noted in “Other Fire Protection
Systems”.
6. Initial inspections are included in the permit review fee. See 4 below
7. Increased fees are intended to reduce the number of inspections due to non -compliance
or failure to correct previously noted deficiencies.
8. These fees are in accordance with City of Auburn Resolution # 4143.
9. Preventable nuisance and malfunction false alarms exist to reduce unwarranted calls that
remove emergency apparatus from service. Though there is no penalty for 1st and 2nd
violations, it provides the opportunity for the VRFA to educate owners about any
mechanical problems within a system that may not be the fault of occupancy tenants. It
further grants the opportunity for repair technicians to correct any deficiencies that may
exist. Subsequent false alarms incur a penalty in an attempt to encourage needed
repairs of the associated systems. The fees are an average of the false alarm fees in the
City of Auburn Resolution # 4143, and the City of Pacific Resolution # 3773, as amended
by resolution # 3797, Resolution # 3818, and Resolution # 3953. See 5 below
10. The Rapid Access Key Box System is currently utilized in all VRFA cities. The purpose
of this system is to allow for rapid entry into premises with fire protection systems. The
system incorporates the use of key boxes, key padlocks and electronic gate key
switches. A master key designated only for VRFA use is placed within all emergency
apparatus and is utilized to operate such devices.
11. This fee is in accordance with RCW 43.56.120
Page 111 of 244
EXHIBIT “A”
12. Associated charges for CPR training are established to recover costs by VRFA
personnel. This is not a revenue generated program, but is designed to offset the
associated costs of the VRFA in providing the service.
1. The VRFA establishes its review and inspection fees on a percentage of the permit fee
assessed by the authority having jurisdiction. Using a percentage of the jurisdictional fee as the
basis of VRFA fees eliminates the need to adjust the VRFA fee schedule every time a
jurisdictional fee changes.
2. The fee only applies to single family occupancies that require fire protection systems.
3. Hourly rate is based on the direct costs of VRFA staff time, salary, benefits, overhead,
administrative costs and resources.
4. Includes plan review and first two inspections.
5. Preventable nuisance and malfunction false alarms exist to reduce unwarranted calls that
remove emergency apparatus from service. Though there is no penalty for 1st and 2nd
violations, it provides the opportunity for the VRFA to educate owners about any mechanical
problems within a system that may not be the fault of occupancy tenants. It further grants the
opportunity for repair technicians to correct any deficiencies that may exist. Subsequent false
alarms incur a penalty in an attempt to encourage needed repairs of the associated systems.
6. The VRFA Fire Marshal is authorized to reduce or waive any fees for permits. In compelling
cases where the applicant - the party responsible for payment of such fees - is an organization
exempt from taxation under 26 USC 501(c)(3), and where the permit relates directly to the
provision of charitable services to residences of the VRFA service area, the VRFA Fire Marshal
is vested with discretion to reduce any fees for permits, publications, and actions by up to 50%.
7. Permits that are not completed and no project improvements are made can, in writing, as k for
the inspection fees to be refunded.
Page 112 of 244
See last page for explanatory notes 1 of 5
Activity Fee
1
1.1 Commercial Occupancy Review 35% of Jurisdictional Fee 1
1.2 Multi-Family Occupancy Review (R2)20% of Jurisdictional Fee 1
1.3
Other Permit Fees (mechanical, plumbing
etc...)$216.00 3
1.4 Revisions to previously reviewed plans $216.00 3
1.5 Single Family Occupancy Review (R3) 15% of Jurisdictional Fee 2
2
2.1 Boundary Line Adjustment $108.00 3
2.2
Civil Reviews (hydrant placement, fire flow,
fire department access, grading)$216.00 3
2.3
Preliminary Plat and Plat Reviews
(subdivisions)$216.00 3
2.4
Other Permit Fees (miscellaneous,
administrative, etc...)$108.00 3
2.5 SEPA review $216.00 3
2.6 Short Plat Review $216.00 3
2.7 Variances $108.00 3
2.8 Water Availability Reviews $108.00 3
3
3.1
Commercial Automatic Fire Protection System
(Fire Sprinkler)$356.00 + $0.75 per sprinkler head over 10 heads 3
3.2
Commercial and Residential Automatic Fire
Protection System (Underground Fire Sprinkler
Line) (WAC 105.7.20)
$356.00 per system / building3
3.3
Commercial Automatic or Manual Fire Alarm
Systems $356.00 + $5.00 per device over 5 devices 3
3.4 Commercial Kitchen Fire Protection System $356.00 + $0.75 per sprinkler head over 10 heads 3
3.5
Commercial: Other Fire Protection Systems
(clean agent, FM200, wet or dry chemical,
CO2, foam, mist, inert gas, and other systems)
$356.00 + $0.75 per sprinkler head over 10 heads 3
3.6
Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System
(DAS)$356.00 +$0.75 per device 3
3.7 Fireworks Display Permit $356.00 3
3.8 Fireworks Sales Permit $108.00 3
Valley Regional Fire Authority 2018 Fee Schedule
Building Department Review (Includes Initial Inspection)
Effective January 1, 2018 and will remain in effect unless amended by the VRFA Board of Governance
Land Use Reviews
Fire Protection Systems (Includes Plan Review and Initial 2 Inspections) 4
Page 113 of 244
See last page for explanatory notes 2 of 5
Activity Fee
3.9 Other Miscellaneous Plan Review not listed $356.00 3
3.10
Over the Counter Permit (fire sprinkler with
less than 10 sprinkler heads, or fire alarm with
less than 5 devices)
$108.00 3
3.11 Residential (R3) Fire Sprinkler System $108.00 + $0.75 per device over 10 devices 3
Spray Booth Installation
3.12 Spray Booth Fire Protection System $356.00 + $0.75 per device over 10 devices 3
3.13 Spray Booth Fire Alarm System $356.00 + $5.00 per device over 5 devices 3
4
4.1 Battery Systems $648.00 3
4.2 New Business License Review Included with Fire Benefit Charge
4.3 Compressed Gases $648.00 3
4.4 Cryogenic Fluids $648.00 3
4.5 Fire Pump & Equipment $648.00 3
4.6
Flammable and Combustible Liquids (including
above ground tanks, below ground tanks, dip
tanks, etc…)
$648.00 3
4.7 Hazardous Materials Facility $648.00 3
4.8 Industrial Ovens $648.00 3
4.9 LP Gas Commercial $648.00 3
4.10 LP Gas Residential $356.00 3
4.11 Marijuana Extraction Systems (WAC 105.7.19)$648.00 3
4.12 Commercial Heating Tank Removal $356.00 3
4.13 Residential Home Heating Tank Removal $108.00 3
4.14 Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems, Residential $393.00 3
4.15 Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems, Commercial $648.00 3
4.16
Temporary Tent/Membrane Structure > 400
square feet $216.00 3
4.17
Working without a permit or ahead of the
permit Double the permit and inspection fee
5
5.1 Initial Inspection Included in the permit fee
5.2 1st Re-inspection Included in the permit fee
5.3 2nd Re-inspection $216 for first 2 hours 3
5.4 Any subsequent (after 2nd) re-inspection $216 for first 2 hours 3
Inspection Fees
Other Fire Permits (Includes Plan Review and Initial 2 inspections) 4
Page 114 of 244
See last page for explanatory notes 3 of 5
Activity Fee
5.5
After Hours Inspection (Outside of normal
business hours)$162.00 per hour (2 hour minimum) 3
5.6
Progressive Inspections (beyond the first 2
inspections)$108.00 per hour (2 hour minimum) 3
5.7
Re-inspection (due to a failure to cancel
appointment or work not ready for inspection
at time of appointment)
$108.00 per hour (2 hour minimum) 3
6
6.1 Pre-Application Fees Included with Fire Benefit Charge
7
7.1
Use of Outside Consultants for Plan Review
and Inspection, and Rapid Access Equipment Actual Costs
8
8.1 Fire Ambulance Transport Fee $821.26
8.2 Fire Ambulance Transport Mileage Fee $16.87per mile
8.3
Preventable Nuisance or Malfunction Alarm -
1st and 2nd violation No Penalty
8.4
Preventable Nuisance or Malfunction Alarm -
3rd violation $75.00
8.5
Preventable Nuisance or Malfunction Alarm - 4
or more violations $150.00
9
Description Rate (effective 01/01/2018)
9.1 General Records - paper copies $0.15 per page
9.2 General Records - electronic copies $0.10 per page + cost of media
9.3 Medical Incident Reports - Clerical Fee $25.00 per report
9.4 Medical Incident Reports - paper copies -
Pages 1-30 $1.12 per page
9.5 Medical Incident Reports - paper copies -
Pages 31+$0.84 per page
9.6 Medical Incident Reports - electronic copies $0.10 per page + cost of media
9.7 Records mailed or shipped Actual cost of postage and container
9.8 Video and audio tapes Actual cost to reproduce
10
10.1 Public CPR Certification Training $25.00 per student
False Alarm Responses (within a calendar year)
Classes and Training
Pre-Application Fees
Consultant Fees
Other Fire Authority Fees
Public Records Requests RCW70.020.010 & WAC 246-08-400
Page 115 of 244
See last page for explanatory notes 4 of 5
11
Permit type Fee
11.1 Aerosol products Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.2 Amusement building Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.3 Aviation facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.4 Carbon dioxide systems Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.5 Carnivals and fairs Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.6 Combustible dust producing operations Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.7 Combustible fibers Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.8 Compressed gases Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.9 Cover and open mall buildings Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.10 Cryogenic fluids Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.11 Cutting and welding Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.12 Dry cleaning Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.13 Exhibits and trade shows Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.14 Explosives Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.15 Flammable and combustible liquids Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.16 Fruit and crop ripening Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.17 Fumigation and insecticidal fogging Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.18 Hazardous materials Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.19 High piled storage Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.20 Hot work operations Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.21 Industrial ovens Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.22 Lumber yards and woodworking plants Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.23
Liquid or gas fueled vehicles or equipment in
assembly buildings Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.24 Liquid Petroleum (LP) gas Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.25 Magnesium Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.26
Miscellaneous combustible storage (tires,
empty packing cases, rubber)Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.27 Motor fuel dispensing facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.28 Organic coatings Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.29 Place of assembly Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.30 Private fire hydrants Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.31 Refrigeration equipment Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.32
Repair garages and motor fuel dispensing
facilities Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.33
Spraying or dipping operation using flammable
or combustible liquids or powders Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.34
Storage of tires, scrap tires, and by-products
or rebuilding plants Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.35 Temporary membrane structure and tents Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.36 Waste handling Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.37 Wood products Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
11.38
Commercial kitchens with type I or type II
hoods (ACC 10.36A.025)Included with the Fire Benefit Charge
The International Fire Code 105.6 Required Operational Permits authorizes the fire code official to issue operational
permits for operations listed below.
OPERATIONAL PERMITS
Page 116 of 244
See last page for explanatory notes 5 of 5
Explanatory notes:
1. The VRFA establishes its review and inspection fees on a percentage of the permit fee assessed by the authority
having jurisdiction. Using a percentage of the jurisdictional fee as the basis of VRFA fees eliminates the need to
adjust the VRFA fee schedule every time a jurisdictional fee changes.
2.The fee only applies to single family occupancies that require fire protection systems.
3. Hourly rate is based on the direct costs of VRFA staff time, salary, benefits, overhead, administrative costs, and
resources.
4. Includes plan review and first two inspections.
5. Preventable nuisance and malfunction false alarms exist to reduce unwarranted calls that remove emergency
apparatus from service. Though there is no penalty for 1st and 2nd violations, it provides the opportunity for the
VRFA to educate owners about any mechanical problems within a system that may not be the fault of occupancy
tenants. It further grants the opportunity for repair technicians to correct any deficiencies that may exist.
Subsequent false alarms incur a penalty in an attempt to encourage needed repairs of the associated systems.
6. The VRFA Fire Marshal is authorized to reduce or waive any fees for permits. In compelling cases where the
applicant -the party responsible for payment of such fees -is an organization exempt from taxation under 26 USC
501(c)(3), and where the permit relates directly to the provision of charitable services to residences of the VRFA
service area, the VRFA Fire Marshal is vested with discretion to reduce any fees for permits, publications, and actions
by up to 50%.
7. Permits that are not completed and no project improvements are made can, in writing, ask for the inspection fees
to be refunded.
Page 117 of 244
Permit Type
2008
application
fee 2008 device fee 2008 total fee
2018 application
fee 2018 device fee 2018 Permit fee 2018 total fees change
FIR15-0200 Fire Sprinklers # 1806 X $0.75 $250.00 $1,354.50 $1,604.50 $216.00 $1,354.50 $140.40 $1,710.90 $106.40
FIR17-0011 Fire Sprinklers # 72 X $0.75 $250.00 $54.00 $304.00 $216.00 $54.00 $140.40 $410.40 $106.40
FIR17-0013 OTC Fire Alarms # under 10 $250.00 $0.00 $250.00 $216.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 -$34.00
FIR17-0036 Fire Alarms # 267 $250.00 $200.00 $450.00 $216.00 $200.00 $140.40 $556.40 $106.40
TEN17-0111 Tenant Improvement 35% job $522.75 $522.75 $522.75 $522.75 $0.00
BLD13-0544 Commercial 35%$23,875.90 $23,875.90 $23,875.90 $23,875.90 $0.00
FIR16-0238 ERR (2018 + $0.75)$200.00 $0.00 $200.00 $216.00 $75.00 $140.40 $431.40 $231.40
FIR16-00192 Sprinkler underground $200.00 $0.00 $200.00 $216.00 $140.40 $356.40 $156.40
FIR16-0014 Commercial Kitchen + $0.75 $200.00 $9.75 $209.75 $216.00 $140.40 $356.40 $146.65
FIR15-0205 Fire Alarm 480 X $5.00 $250.00 $2,400.00 $2,650.00 $216.00 $2,400.00 $140.40 $2,756.40 $106.40
FIR15-0200 Sprinkler aboveground $250.00 $1,354.50 $1,604.50 $216.00 $1,354.50 $140.40 $1,710.90 $106.40
GRA Grading $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 $216.00
MIS MIS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 $216.00
FAC FAC $118.00 $0.00 $118.00 $216.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 $98.00
Total $28,858.15 $30,135.40 $1,277.25
TEN16-0050 H facility 35%$461.14 $0.00 $461.14 $461.14 $0.00 $0.00 $461.14 $0.00
FIR16-0123 ERR (2018 + $0.75)$250.00 $0.00 $250.00 $216.00 $0.00 $140.40 $356.40 $106.40
FIR16-0106 Fire alarms # 41 X 5 $250.00 $205.00 $455.00 $216.00 $205.00 $140.40 $561.40 $106.40
FIR16-0098 Sprinklers OTC $250.00 $0.00 $250.00 $216.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.00 -$34.00
FIR16-097 Dry chem system X .75 $250.00 $1.50 $251.50 $216.00 $1.50 $140.40 $357.90 $106.40
FIR16-0094 Relocate propane tank $200.00 $0.00 $200.00 $393.00 $0.00 $255.45 $648.45 $448.45
FIR16-0055 sprinklers 44 X .75 $250.00 $17.25 $277.00 $216.00 $17.25 $140.40 $373.65 $96.65
NEW PERMIT Flammable & Combustible $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $393.00 $0.00 $255.45 $648.45 $648.45
Permit total $2,144.64 $3,623.39 $1,478.75
Merrill Gardens 114 Unit Senior Living Job Valuation $17,029,451
Imaginetics Hazardous Materials Occupancy Job Valuation $170,000
VRFA Fee Schedule 2008-2018 Comparison
Page 118 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6659 - SODA Relating to New Gross
Misdemeanor Violations Concerning Drug-related Activities (15
Minutes) (Heid)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
City Attorney
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6659
Draft S ODA Areas
Parks Inventory
Arlington Draft SODA
Bothell Municipal Code
Bothell SODA Order
Bothell SODA Order
Everett Municipal Code
Lakewood Municipal Code
Marys ville Ordinance
Marys ville Ordinance
Shoreline Ordinance
Tacoma Code
Tacoma Ordinance
Univers ity Place Ordinance
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Review SODA Ordinance.
Background Summary:
Ordinance No. 6659 proposes to add a new Chapter 9.24 to the City Code. This chapter,
patterned af ter a similar code provisions in cities across the state, seeks to identif y certain
areas within the City as being subject to an anti-drug emphasis. Those portions of the City
that are identified as anti-drug emphasis areas could be used as an enf orcement tool for
people engaging in illegal drug activity in certain areas could be ordered to stay out of those
areas, and there f ailing to do so could constitute a public nuisance and a violation of the law
f or which penalties could be assessed. Samples of similar ordinances are included here with,
including samples from Tacoma, Lakewood, Marysville, Everett, Bothell, shoreline, University
Place and Arlington (proposed). Each of these ordinances, seeks to accomplish the same
thing that. Auburn’s proposed ordinance seeks to accomplish. Checking with prosecutors
involved with some of these jurisdictions, the assessment, we received was that this is a
valuable tool for the police, prosecutors, and courts to address recurring illegal drug activities
in certain areas. This ordinance would/could result in additional prosecution to address illegal
Page 119 of 244
drug activity, but it gives the police an additional tool that would not otherwise be available. If a
person were convicted of a crime involving illegal drug activity in a certain area of the city that
has been identified as a drug emphasis area, the court order in the violation could include a
provision that restricts the violator from returning to that area. Other than where the violator
lives within one of the identif ied drug enf orcement areas, it would be advantageous for the
city, the police and neighbors to have people restricted f rom returning to locations where drug
activities were occurring. Again, the cities with whom we were able to check regarding their
similar ordinances expressed support for the use of such an ordinance.
Also, in connection with Ordinance No. 6659, although the drug emphasis areas are defined
in the ordinance, to assist in visualizing where those drug emphasis areas are within the city,
maps showing the identified drug emphasis areas and city parks (also drug emphasis areas)
are included as well.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 120 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 5 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 1.24.010
OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE AND CREATING A NEW
CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO
NEW GROSS MISDEMEANOR VIOLATIONS CONCERNING
DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITIES
WHEREAS, the current provisions of the Auburn City Code include prohibitions on
certain drug-related activities but do not, at this point, identify target areas for enforcement
- identifying those areas where drug-related activities are most problematic; and
WHEREAS, in connection with a more effective enforcement of illegal drug related
activities and an intent to target those areas most adversely affected by such activities, it
is appropriate for the City to establish areas where illegal drug enforcement should be
emphasized and procedures for such enforcement; and
WHEREAS, under a Stay Out of Designated Area (SODA) ordinance, citizens
convicted of drug- related crimes may be prevented from entering a specific area of the
city known for drug problems, and judges would be able to issue these SODA orders
which would be effective for designated periods of time, during which time, the person
could be arrested if the order is violated.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE. Section 1.24.010 of the Auburn city
code be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows:
1.24.010 Criminal penalties generally.
A. Unless a specific penalty is expressly provided, for all violations of
ordinances of the city which are identified as misdemeanors, upon conviction, such
violations are punishable by imprisonment in the appropriate city or county jail for
a period of up to ninety (90) days and a fine of up to $1,000.00, or by both such
fine and imprisonment.
B. Unless a specific penalty is expressly provided, for all violations of
ordinances of the city which are identified as gross misdemeanors, upon
Page 121 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 2
conviction, such violations are punishable by imprisonment in the appropriate city
or county jail for a period of up to one year three hundred sixty-four (364) days and
a fine of up to $5,000.00, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
C. Any violations of ordinances of the city that are identified as criminal
violations, including being punishable by criminal penalties, but not identified as to
whether they are misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors, shall be deemed
misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors, as follows:
1. Criminal violations that are punishable by up to and including
imprisonment in the appropriate city or county jail for a period of up to one
yearthree hundred sixty-four (364) days and a fine of up to $5,000.00, or by both
such fine and imprisonment, shall be deemed gross misdemeanors; provided, that
criminal violations that are punishable by not more than imprisonment in the
appropriate city or county jail for a period of up to ninety (90) days and a fine of up
to $1,000.00, or by both such fine and imprisonment, shall be deemed
misdemeanors;
2. Criminal violations that are adopted by reference from state statutes, or
extrapolated with the same or substantially the same language from state statutes,
shall be classified as misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors consistent with their
classification by state statutes, and shall be punishable accordingly;
3. Criminal violations that are not identifiable as either misdemeanors or
gross misdemeanors shall be deemed misdemeanors and shall be punishable
accordingly.
D. In addition, a defendant may be assessed court costs, jury fees and such
other fees or costs as may be authorized in statute or court rules. In any court
proceeding to enforce this section, the city shall have the burden of proving by
evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that a violation occurred. In a proceeding
under this section a defendant shall be accorded each and every right protected
under the Constitutions of the United States of America and the state of
Washington, all applicable federal, state and local laws, and applicable court rules
promulgated by the Washington Supreme Court and the inferior courts under the
authority of the Washington Supreme Court. (Ord. 5677 § 1, 2002; Ord. 4285 § 2,
1988; Ord. 3618 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2754 § 1, 1973.)
SECTION 2. NEW CHAPTER TO CITY CODE. A new Chapter 9.24 is hereby
created and added to the Auburn City Code, to read as follows:
Chapter 9.24
DRUG RELATED ACTIVITIES
Sections:
9.24.010 Loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related activity.
9.24.020 Designation of anti-drug emphasis areas.
9.24.030 Violation of conditions of release, suspension or deferral as
separate crime.
9.24.040 Places of illegal drug activity declared public nuisances.
Page 122 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 3
9.24.050 Evidence of use for illegal drug purposes.
9.24.060 Conviction as prima facie evidence.
9.24.070 Penalties for maintenance of public nuisance.
9.24.080 Violation - Penalty.
9.24.010 Loitering with the Intent of engaging in drug-related activity.
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any public rights-of-
way, or any public or private property in a manner and under circumstances
manifesting the intent to engage in illegal drug-related activity contrary to RCW
chapters 69.41, 69.50, 69.53 or 69.53, or to chapter 9.22 of the city code.
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining
whether such intent is manifested are the following:
1. Such person is a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller. For
purposes of this chapter, a “known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller” is a
person who has been convicted in any court within this state of any violation
involving the use, possession, or sale of any of the substances referred to in
chapters 69.41, 69.50, 69.52 and 69.53 RCW, or substantially similar laws of any
political subdivision of this state or of any other state; or who is known to have
been arrested for a drug related violation not resulting in a conviction because the
person participated in a diversionary program, deferral program, drug court or a
similar program; or a person who displays physical characteristics of drug
intoxication or usage, such as “needle tracks”; or who possesses marijuana in a
manner not authorized by RCW 69.50.4013 (1), RCW 69.50.4013 (2) and or in
amounts that exceed those set forth in RCW 69.50.360(3);
2. Such person is currently subject to an order from any court
prohibiting his/her presence in a high drug activity geographic area;
3. Such person behaves in such a manner as to raise a reasonable
suspicion that he or she is about to engage in or is then engaged in an unlawful
drug-related activity, including by way of example only, such person acting as a
“lookout”;
4. Such person is physically identified by a police officer, based on
articulable factors, as a member of a “gang,” or an association which engages in
illegal drug activity. Factors that support an officer physically identifying a person
as a member of such a gang or association include, but are not limited to clothing,
tattoos, known association and/or affiliation with such gang or association, specific
and observed acts or circumstances consistent with drug related activity, and
gestures, signs, greetings and movements that are consistent with gang related
activity, provided that clothing alone shall not be sufficient, without more, to support
an officer physically identifying a person as a member of such a gang or
association;
5. Such person transfers small objects or packages for currency in a
furtive fashion;
6. Such person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer;
Page 123 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 4
7. Such person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or herself or
any object which reasonably could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity;
8. The area involved is by public repute known to be an area of unlawful
drug use and trafficking;
9. The premises involved are known to have been reported to law
enforcement as a place suspected of drug activity pursuant to chapter 69.53 RCW.
10. Any vehicle involved is registered to a known unlawful drug user,
possessor, or seller, or a person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for a
crime involving drug-related activity.
9.24.020 Designation of anti-drug emphasis areas.
A. Certain areas of the city shall be designated as and identified to be
anti-drug emphasis areas based on the repeat incidents of illegal drug activities
occurring therein, and enhanced penalties shall be applied in event of conviction
of unlawful drug related acts or loitering for drug purposes, within the said areas.
The areas to be so designated shall be identified by the city council in an ordinance
or resolution passed after consultation with the mayor, city attorney and the chief
law enforcement officer of the city, and the list identifying such areas shall be kept
on file in the office of the city clerk. Additional areas may also be identified by the
judge of the municipal or district court hearing drug related cases arising from
within the city. If a defendant is convicted of a drug related case occurring from
within an area designated as an anti-drug emphasis area, a condition or term of
sentence, deferral, or suspension, shall be that such defendant shall stay out of all
areas of the city designated as an anti-drug emphasis areas, unless there are
significant and substantial extenuating circumstances in the defendant's particular
case justifying avoidance of the requirement for such condition or term of sentence,
deferral, or suspension. In such case, the significant and substantial extenuating
circumstances shall be identified and recited in the record of the case.
B. The following areas are hereby designated as and identified to be
anti-drug emphasis areas:
AREA I. DOWNTOWN AREA:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF E STREET NE AND 23RD
STREET NE; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF N STREET NE
AND 24TH STREET NE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID TANGENT EAST
TO THE GREEN RIVER; THENCE EASTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY
ALONG THE GREEN RIVER TO A POINT THAT IS EAST OF 14TH STREET NE;
THENCE WEST ALONG 14TH STREET NE, AS EXTENDED, TO AUBURN WAY
NORTH.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG AUBURN WAY NORTH TO 4TH
STREET NE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG 4th STREET NE TO J STREET NE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG - J STREET NE AND SE AS EXTENDED TO
STATE HIGHWAY 18; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG. STATE HIGHWAY 18, TO
M STREET SE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG M STREET SE TO 8TH STREET SE;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG 8TH STREET SE TO A POINT THAT IS SOUTH
OF J STREET SE, AS EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID J
STREET SE EXTENSION TO 9TH STREET SE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG
9TH STREET SE TO H STREET SE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG H STREET SE TO
Page 124 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 5
THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND RUNNING GENERALLY PARALLEL TO 9TH
STREET SE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ALLEY TO ITS
INTERSECTION WITH AUBURN WAY, SOUTH; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY
ALONG AUBURN WAY SOUTH TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH F STREET SE;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG F STREET SE TO ITS INTERSECTION
WITH 9TH ST REET SE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG 9TH STREET SE, AS
EXTENDED, TO THE INTERURBAN TRAIL; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
THE INTERURBAN TRAIL TO 2ND STREET NW; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG
2ND STREET NW TO C STREET NW; THENCE NORTHERLY TO A POINT THAT
IS WEST OF 18TH STREET NE, AS EXTENDED, THENCE EAST TO E STREET
NE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG E STREET NE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
AREA II. THE OUTLET COLLECTION:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF 15TH STREET SW AND STATE
HIGHWAY 167; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 167 TO
STATE HIGHWAY 18; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 18 TO
THE INTERURBAN TRAIL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE INTERURBAN
TRAIL TO 15TH STREET SW; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG 15TH STREET SW
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AREA III. MUCKLESHOOT CASINO:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF AUBURN WAY SOUTH
(STATE HIGHWAY 164) AND 17TH STREET SE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG
17TH STREET SE TO R STREET SE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG R STREET
SE, AS EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 1170 FEET; THENCE EAST TO THE
INTERSECTION OF ELM STREET SE AND SCENIC DRIVE SE; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG THE MOST NORTHERLY WEST LINE OF THE PLAT OF
SHERMAN ACRES, VOLUME 71, PAGE 94, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, TO
THE MOST NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SHERMAN ACRES; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SHERMAN ACRES TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PLAT OF FOREST VILLA NO. 3, VOLUME 68,
PAGE 49, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG
THE PLAT BOUNDARY OF SAID FOREST VILLA NO. 3 TO THE MOST
NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 OF SAID FOREST VILLA NO. 3; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FOREST VILLA NO.3, AS
EXTENDED, TO AUBURN WAY SOUTH (STATE HIGHWAY 164); THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG AUBURN WAY SOUTH (STATE HIGHWAY 164) TO
HEMLOCK STREET SE THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF
HEMLOCK STREET SE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION A DISTANCE OF
1000 FEET; THENCE WEST TO THE INTERSECTION OF DOGWOOD STREET
SE AND FOREST RIDGE DRIVE SE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
DOGWOOD STREET SE TO AUBURN WAY S. (STATE HIGHWAY 164);
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG AUBURN WAY SOUTH (STATE HIGHWAY 164)
TO RIVERWALK DRIVE SE; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG RIVERWALK DRIVE SE TO HOWARD ROAD; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG HOWARD ROAD ITS INTERSECTION WITH R
STREET SE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 125 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 6
AREA IV. SOUTH END:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WHITE RIVER AND A
STREET SE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A STREET SE TO 21ST STREET
SE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG 21ST STREET SE TO R STREET SE; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG R STREET SE TO 29TH STREET SE; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG 29TH STREET SE TO M STREET SE.; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG M STREET SE, AS EXTENDED, TO THE WHITE RIVER;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE WHITE RIVER TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
AREA V. CITY PARK PROPERTY:
ALL CITY PARK PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE CITY IS
DESIGNATED AS AN ANTI-DRUG EMPHASIS AREA. FOR THE PURPOSES
HEREOF, CITY PARK PROPERTY INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE
FOLLOWING PARK PROPERTIES AND ALL FACILITIES, AMENITIES AND
COMPONENTS THEREIN:
Park Address Proximate Acres
21st Street Playground 405 21st St. SE 0.17
104th Ave SE (Green River
Park) 31495 104th Ave. SE 14.73
Auburndale 31802 108th Ave. SE 9.64
Auburndale II 29725 118th Ave. SE 9.34
Auburn Environmental Park 413 Western Ave. NW 120
Auburn Golf Course 29630 Green River RD SE 180
Ballard 1612 37th Way SE 0.66
Bicentennial Park 502 Auburn Way S. 1.07
B Street Plaza 148 E. Main Street 0.10
Brannan 1019 28th St. NE 26.63
Cameron 3727 Lemon Tree Lane 3.83
Cedar Lanes 1002 25th St. SE 8.27
Centennial Viewpoint 402 Mountain View Dr. 0.7
City Hall Plaza 25 West Main Street 1.10
Clark Plaza 1420 Auburn Way N. 0.25
Page 126 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 7
Park Address Proximate Acres
Clark Property 1300 block, Oravetz Road - Parcel
No. 302105-9025
SE ¼ OF SE ¼ Lying South of
Stuck River, less Roads, Sec. 30,
Twp. 21 N., Rge. 5 E. WM
26.68
Community Garden 1030 8th Street NE 1.04
Dorothy Bothell Park 1087 Evergreen Way SE 4
Dykstra 1487 22nd St. NE 1.78
Fenster Nature Park 2033 4th St. SE 12.58
Forest Villa 1647 Fir St. SE 0.23
Fulmer Park 1101 5th St. NE 5.13
Gaines Park 1008 Pike St. NW 1.34
Game Farm 3030 R St. SE 53.0
Game Farm Wilderness 2401 Stuck River Dr. SE 72.0
GSA Park 413 15th St. SW 6.13
Indian Tom Park 1316 6th St. NE 0.43
Isaac Evans 29827 Green River RD SE 19.87
Jacobsen Tree Farm 29387 132nd Ave. SE 29.3
Jornada Park 1433 U Ct. NW 1.89
Kersey Way A 5480 Charlotte Ave. SE 2.73
Kersey Way B 5530 Udall Ave. SE 0.79
Lakeland Hills 1401 Evergreen Way SE 5.05
Lea Hill 31693 124th Ave. SE 9.0
Lea Hill Tennis Courts 32121 105th Pl. SE 1.18
Les Gove 910 9th St. SE 20.86
Mary Olson Farm 28728 Green River RD SE 67
Mill Pond 4582 Mill Pond Dr. SE 4
Page 127 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 8
Park Address Proximate Acres
Mountain View Cemetery 2020 Mountain View Dr. 60
Pioneer Cemetery 8th St. NE & Auburn Way North 0.76
Plaza Park 2 West Main Street 0.19
Riverpoint Park 1450 32nd St. NE 3.8
Riversands Park 5014 Pike St. NE 1.76
Roegner Park 601 Oravetz Road SE 21.25
Rotary Park 2635 Alpine St. SE 4.14
Scootie Brown Park 1403 Henry Rd. NE 1.34
Shaughnessy Park 3302 21st St. SE 3.46
Slaughter Memorial 2988 Auburn Way N. 0.02
Sunset park 1420 69th St. SE 15
Terminal Park 1292 C St. SE 1.2
Veterans Memorial 405 E St.NE 7.65
Village Square Park 12111 SE 310th St. 1.10
West Hill Lake Property 32054 58th Ave. S 9.25
In addition to the above described park properties, the city park property
anti-drug emphasis area includes any and all properties, whether owned by the
city or not on which any part thereof is used for trail and/or recreational purposes
and which is maintained, in whole or in part, by the city of Auburn, including but
not limited to the following:
(a) Interurban Trail: This trail parallels the Union Pacific Railroad for
much of its length. The Interurban Trail currently runs north to
south through Tukwila, Kent, Auburn, Algona and Pacific, and is
approximately 17 miles long, with 4.5 miles in Auburn.
(b) White River Trail: The White River Trail, within Roegner Park,
extends along the White River to the Game Farm Wilderness
Park for 2.25 miles.
(c) Lakeland Linear Trail: Lakeland Linear Trail meanders from
Evergreen Way along Lakeland Hills Way connecting to Sunset
Park.
Page 128 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 9
(d) Reddington Levee Trail: This trail goes from Brannan
Park/Brannan St., North to I St. along the Green River, for 1.7
miles.
(e) C Street Trail: The C Street Trail extends from Ellingson Road
SW, along C Street SW, to 15th Street SW.
C. Each of the above described/designated anti-drug emphasis areas
includes all rights-of-way located within the described areas and also includes any
and all rights-of-way adjacent to the outer perimeter thereof.
D. Each of the above described/designated anti-drug emphasis areas
includes the total real estate parcel area of all parcel where any part of which is
located within any of the above described designated anti-drug emphasis areas.
9.24.030 Violation of conditions of release, suspension or deferral as separate
crime.
The presence of any person within an anti-drug emphasis area in violation
of court-imposed conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral of
any sentence shall constitute a separate crime hereby designated a gross
misdemeanor and any such person may be apprehended and arrested without the
necessity for any warrant or additional court order. Upon conviction, any person so
violating the conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral shall be
punished by imprisonment in jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more
three hundred sixty-four days, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not
more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and
fine.
9.24.040 Places of illegal drug activity declared public nuisances.
Any building, structure or place within the city used for drug related activity
or for loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related activity as defined in this
chapter is hereby declared to be a public nuisance.
9.24.050 Evidence of use for illegal drug purposes.
A. Two or more criminal convictions of persons for drug related offenses in
a building, structure or place, within the one-year period preceding the
commencement of an action under this chapter shall give rise to a rebuttable
presumption that the building, structure or place has been used for illegal drug
purposes and is a public nuisance. In any action under this chapter, evidence of
the common fame and general reputation of the building or place, of the inmates
or occupants thereof, or of those resorting thereto, shall be admissible as evidence
to prove the existence of the public nuisance but must be supported by additional
evidence. Evidence of the general reputation of the building or place, or of the
inmates or occupants thereof that is sufficient to establish the existence of the
public nuisance, shall be prima facie evidence of knowledge thereof and
acquiescence and participation therein and responsibility for the nuisance by
persons or legal entities having an interest in the property. Responsibility for the
nuisance shall extend to the owners, lessors, lessees and all those in interest in
Page 129 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 10
any form in the property, real or personal, used in conducting or maintaining the
public nuisance.
B. Evidence of cooperation by owners, agents or managers of a building
or place with police investigations or operations to control drug related activity may
be used to rebut the presumptions created in this chapter.
9.24.060 Conviction as prima facie evidence.
Any conviction of any owner, manager, operator, agent or employee for any
illegal drug activity, or for loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related
activity, when such offense was related to any business or commercial enterprise,
shall be prima facie evidence that the building, structure or place upon or in which
business or commercial enterprise is or was conducted, was used for illegal drug
activities.
9.24.070 Penalties for maintenance of public nuisance.
Maintenance of a public nuisance as declared herein, in addition to any
other civil or criminal penalties, shall result in a civil penalty not less than five
hundred dollars ($500.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for a
first conviction of maintaining a public nuisance and by abatement by closure of
such business or commercial enterprise for the period of thirty (30) days for each
subsequent conviction of maintaining a public nuisance, the enforcement of which
shall be in accordance with the procedures identified in chapter 1.25 of the city
code.
9.24.080 Violation - Penalty.
Unless otherwise specifically provided otherwise, any person who violates
the provisions of this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and, upon
conviction, shall be imprisoned in jail for a period of up three hundred sixty-four
days or fined an amount of not more than $5,000.00 or both such jail time and fine.
SECTION 3. IMPLEMENTATION. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Page 130 of 244
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6659
October 19, 2017
Page 11
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
Introduced: ____________________________
Passed: _______________________________
Approved: _____________________________
CITY OF AUBURN
_____________________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: ___________________
Page 131 of 244
1:34,878
DRAFT SODA AREAS
1.10.551.1 0 Miles
NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy.
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
Imagery Date: May 2015
10/25/2017Printed Date:
1 in =0.55 ft
Page 132 of 244
¬«38
¬«44 ¬«25
¬«34¬«43¬«52 ¬«49
¬«42¬«47
¬«15
¬«54
¬«31
¬«32
¬«37
¬«23
¬«35
¬«19
¬«26
¬«9
¬«60
¬«6
¬«29
¬«11
¬«33¬«20
¬«3
¬«24
¬«22
¬«48
¬«56¬«56
¬«50
¬«4 ¬«5
¬«59
¬«58
¬«51
¬«8
¬«10
¬«12
¬«57
¬«2
¬«55
¬«45
¬«13
¬«7
¬«1
¬«46
¬«16
¬«17
¬«55
¬«14
¬«40
¬«53
¬«39
¬«36
¬«18
¬«27
¬«28¬«21
¬«30
L A K ELAKETAPPSTAPPS
TS18
TS18
MERIDIAN AVE EJO V IT AB L V D E
S 277TH ST
WESTVALLEYHWYS24TH ST E
SE 274TH ST
PACIFIC AVE S132ND AVE SEE
ASTVALLEYHWYS 288TH ST
MI
LI
TARYRDS
ELLINGSON RD SW
S 272ND ST
WESTVALLEYHWYSE 272ND ST
8TH ST E28TH AVE S140TH AVE E136TH AVE E108TH AVE SEMILTON WAY
142ND AVE EWEST VALLEY HWY NW38TH AVE SSE
K
E
N
T
-
K
A
N
GLEYRD
STEWART RD SWW
ESTVALLEYHWYEVALENTINE AVE SE68TH AVE S33RD P L S 124TH AVE SE116TH AVE SEPEASLEY CANYONRDS CENTRAL AVE SENCHANTED PKWY SSTEWART RD SE A ST SEMILITARY RD SS 272ND ST
WESTVAL
LEYHWYSMILITARY RD SSE 272ND ST
124TH AVE SEMILITARY RD S12TH ST E
S 288TH ST
182ND AVE E9TH ST E AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND R D SEFORES T CANYONRDE
S 272ND ST
214TH AVE E2
1
0
T
H
A
VE
E
SUMNER-TAPPSHWYE16TH ST E
S
272ND
W
AY
E
NCHANT
ED PKWY
S
A
U
B
UR
N-
E
NU
MC
L
A
W
R
D SAUBURN WAY NWEST VALLEY HWY SMILITARY RD SMILITARYRDSMILIT
ARYRDSTS167
TS167
MUCKL ESHOOT
CASINO
THE
OUTLET
COLL ECTIO N
A ST SEC ST SWA
U
B
U
R
N W
A
Y SB ST NWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY N51ST AVE SR ST SE124TH AVE SEWEST VALLEY HWY NC ST NW132ND AVE SES 277TH ST
15TH ST SW
W MAIN ST
SE 304TH ST
LAKETAPPSPKWY S E
E MAIN ST
41STSTSE
K
E
R
S
E
YWAYSE
29TH ST SE
SE 312TH ST
8TH ST NE
37TH ST NW
ORAVETZRDSEL
AKELANDHILLSWAYSE104THAVESESE 320TH ST
S 316TH ST
321ST ST S
PEASLEYCANYONR
DS
AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SE112TH AVE SEEAST VALLEY HWY ESE304THWA Y
SE 281ST ST
SUMNER-TAPPSHWYE
17TH ST SE
SE 32 0TH ST
A ST SES E 3 0 4T H ST
K E N TKENT
K I N GKING
C O U N T YCOUNTY
E D G E W O O DEDGEWOOD
P A C I F I CPACIFIC
S U M N E RSUMNER
A L G O N AALGONA
P I E R C EPIERCE
C O U N T YCOUNTY
FEDE R A LFEDERALWAYWAY
Information shown is for general reference purposes
only and does not necessarily represent exact
geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The
City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy.
¬
Map ID: 4502
C i t y o f A u b u r n Pa r k s I n v e n t o r y M a p
Printed On: 5/28/2015
City of Auburn
City Parks
Open Space
Special Use Areas
Undeveloped Parks
15 21ST STREET PLAYGROUND
16 AUB UR ND ALE
17 AUBURNDALE 2
18 BALLARD
19 CAMERON
20 CEDAR LANES
21 DOROTHY BOTHELL
22 DYK STRA
23 FOR EST V ILLA TOT LOT
24 GA IN ES
25 IND IA N TOM
26 JORNADA
27 KER SEY WAY A
28 KERSEY WAY B
29 LAKELAND HILLS
30 NORTH TAPPS ESTATES
31 RIV ER POIN T
32 RIVERSANDS
33 ROTARY
34 SCOOTIE BROWN
35 SHAUGHNESSY
36 TERMINAL
37 VILLAGE S QUAR EIDNAME1104TH AVE SE
2 BRA NN AN
3 FULMER
4 GAME FARM
5 GAME FARM WILDERNESS
6 GS A
7 ISAAC EVANS
8 JAC OBSE N TR EE FA RM
9 LE A HILL
10 LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS
11 MILL PON D
12 ROEGNER
13 SUN SET
14 VETER AN S M EMORIAL
38 B STR EE T PLAZA
39 BIC EN TENN IA L
40 CENTENNIAL VIEWPOINT
42 CLARK PLAZA
43 COMMUNITY GARDEN A
44 COMMUNITY GARDEN B
45 ENVIRONMENT
46 FENSTER PROPERTY
47 FLY-IN LION
48 GOLF C OUR SE
49 LE A HILL TE NN IS COU RTS
50 MARY OLSON FARM
51 MOU N TAIN V IEW C EME TERY
52 PION EER C EMETARY
53 PLAZA PAR K
54 SLAUGH TER MEMOR IA L
55 CLAR K P ROPE RTY
56 ENVIRONMENTAL
57 GAME FARM OPEN SPACE
58 GOLF C OUR SE OPEN SPAC E
59 LA KELAN D HILLS NATUR E A REA
60 WES T A UB UR N LA KE PROP ERTY
COMMUNITY
NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL USE AREA
OPEN SPACE
Page 133 of 244
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #4
Attachment
F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
August 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Proposed Stay Out of Designated Areas (SODA) Ordinance
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report, Proposed Ordinance
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Police – Chief Jonathan Ventura; 360‐403‐4621
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: 0
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
BUDGETED AMOUNT: 0
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Council is asked to consider adopting the proposed Stay Out of Designated Areas (SODA) Ordinance.
This ordinance would prohibit court ordered individuals from entering SODA designated [Prohibited]
locations within the City of Arlington.
HISTORY:
The City of Arlington currently does not have a Stay Out of Designated Areas (SODA)
Ordinance. These types of ordinances are often utilized to address anyone charged with or
convicted of possession of drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia,
delivery of drug paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to another
person, possession of controlled substances, or any violation of the Controlled Substances
Act, RCW 69.70 within SODA designated locations.
ALTERNATIVES:
Take no action
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to adopt the proposed Stay Out of Designated Area Ordinance (SODA) and authorize the
Mayor to sign it.
Page 134 of 244
ARLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
INTRADEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 24, 2017
TO: Barb Tolbert, Mayor
City Council Members
FROM: Jonathan Ventura, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Stay Out of Designated Area (SODA) Program
_________________________________________ ________________________
PURPOSE:
To request authorization to designate geographic areas with the City of Arlington as high
narcotics trafficking areas and enact a Stay Out of Designated Area (SODA) municipal
code.
FACTS:
Heroin use in the U.S. has risen
fivefold in the last decade. Opioid
overdose kills about 78 people a day
in the U.S. The City of Arlington has
seen a steady increase in drug
activity, drug related arrests and drug
related overdoses over the last
several years. Drug trafficking occurs
in both public and private locations,
however some geographic areas
have been more affected than others. Even
within our own community, drug trafficking is more openly prevalent in some areas versus
others. Several local cities, including Everett and Marysville, have enacted Stay Out of
Designated [or Drug] Area (SODA) locations to provide their police departments more
tools to assist in addressing known drug areas to help make their communities safer.
Arlington Police Dept. Incidents (2012-2016)
Page 135 of 244
ANALYSIS:
Within the City of Arlington, the retail corridor located within the Smokey Point
neighborhood community has the highest concentration of drug activity as documented
through citizen and business complaints, crime statistics and police observations.
Under a Stay Out of Designated Area (SODA) ordinance, citizens convicted of drug-
related crimes may be prevented from entering a specific area of the city known for drug
problems. Judges would be able to issue these SODA orders, which last up to two years.
If the order is violated, the person can be arrested.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City of Arlington should authorization the designation of certain geographic areas
with the City as high narcotics trafficking areas and have the City Attorney draft a Stay
Out of Designated Area (SODA) Municipal Code Ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Jonathan Ventura
Chief of Police
Page 136 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2017--XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER RELATING TO STAY OUT OF DESIGNATED AREA
(SODA) ORDERS
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to enact laws to protect
citizens and visitors to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is in the best interests of its citizens to add
certain provisions to the City criminal code to provide additional tools to law enforcement and
the courts to protect the citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. A new chapter of the Arlington Municipal Code shall be and hereby is
adopted to read as follows:
Chapter 9.60
STAY OUT OF DESIGNATED AREAS (SODA) ORDERS
Sections:
9.60.010 Orders – Conditions.
9.60.020 Person subject to court order defined.
9.60.030 Stay out of designated areas orders – Issuance – Other court orders.
9.60.040 Violation of order – Penalties.
9.60.050 Prohibited areas – Designation – Modification and termination.
9.60.010 Orders – Conditions.
Any judge or judge pro tempore of the Marysville municipal court may issue
written orders to criminal defendants describing conditions of their pretrial release
or the post-conviction conditions of suspension or deferral of their sentences.
Orders must be substantially in the form described in this chapter.
9.60.020 Person subject to court order defined.
As used in this chapter, “person subject to court order” means any person who is
subject to an order issued under Arlington Municipal Code 9.60.010.
9.60.030 Stay out of designated areas orders – Issuance – Other court orders.
(1) Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a
condition of pretrial release and/or deferral or suspension of sentence that the
defendant stay out of areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking shall be
Page 137 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 2
hereinafter referred to as a “SODA” (“Stay Out of Designated Areas”) order.
(2) SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of
possession of drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia,
delivery of drug paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to
another person, possession of controlled substances, or any violation of the
Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.70.
(3) Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from
issuing an order pursuant to this chapter that is not specifically a SODA order.
9.60.040 Violation of order – Penalties.
(1) Written orders issued under this chapter shall contain the court’s directives
and shall bear the legend:
WARNING: Violation of this order subjects the violator to arrest
under Chapter 9.60 AMC and shall constitute a separate criminal
offense and may result in imposition of suspended or deferred jail
time and/or fine.
(2) Penalties. A person who knowingly and willfully disobeys a SODA (“Stay
Out of Designated Areas”) order issued under this chapter is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
9.60.050 Prohibited areas – Designation – Modification and termination.
(1) Whenever an order is issued under this chapter, the subject of the order may
be ordered to stay out of certain areas that are set forth within the written order.
These areas will hereinafter be referred to as “prohibited areas.”
(2) Prohibited areas that are set forth in SODA orders may be established,
modified, or eliminated by a resolution of the city council. The police department
will provide information to the city council to support establishing, modifying, or
eliminating prohibited areas.
(3) Prohibited areas that are set forth in orders issued under this chapter other than
SODA orders may be set by court discretion and are not required to be set in
accordance with subsection (2) of this section.
(4) Upon request for modification or termination of any order issued under this
chapter, the court shall consider the requested modification or termination by
allowing for a process by which the subject of the order can provide relevant
testimony or other evidence in support of his/her request.
(5) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order issued under this chapter shall
have as its termination date two years from the date of its issuance.
(6) Whenever an order is issued, modified or terminated pursuant to this chapter,
the clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next
judicial day to the Arlington police department. Upon receipt of the copy of the
order, the Arlington police department shall enter the order until the expiration
date specified on the order into any computer-based criminal intelligence
Page 138 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 3
information system(s) available to Arlington police officers. Upon receipt of
notice that an order has been terminated, the Arlington police department shall
remove the order from the computer-based criminal intelligence information
system(s).
(7) Nothing in any provision of this chapter related to SODA orders shall be
construed as prohibiting the subject of a SODA order from participating in a
scheduled court hearing or from attending a scheduled meeting with his/her legal
counsel within a prohibited area.
Section 2. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five days from its adoption
and publication as required by law.
PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of
_______________, 2017.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
Attest:
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Steven J. Peiffle
City Attorney
Page 139 of 244
Bothell Municipal Code
1
Chapter 9.04
STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS
Sections:
9.04.010 Definitions.
9.04.020 Orders – Conditions.
9.04.030 Person subject to court order defined.
9.04.040 Stay Out of Drug Areas orders – Issuance – Other court orders.
9.04.050 Prohibited areas – Designation – Modification and termination.
9.04.060 Stay Out of Drug Areas – Defined boundaries.
9.04.070 Drug loitering prohibited.
9.04.080 Chapter cumulative.
9.04.090 Penalties.
9.04.010 Definitions.
A. “Controlled substances” means a drug, substance, or its immediate precursor, listed in Schedule I, II, III, or
IV of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Chapter 69.50 RCW.
B. “Drug” means:
1. Substances recognized as drugs in the official U.S. pharmacopoeia, official homeopathic
pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official national formulary, or any supplement to any of
them; or
2. Substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of
diseases in humans or animals; or
3. Substances affecting or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of humans
or animals, except for food, and except for vitamins and minerals approved by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration for use as minerals and vitamins.
C. “Drug-related activity” means any of the following:
1. Administering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances, whether by
injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means, to oneself or to another person; or
2. Delivering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances by the actual,
constructive or attempted transfer of drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled
substances from one person to another; or
3. Distributing drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances by transferring or
arranging for their transfer other than by administering or delivering them.
D. “Prohibited area” means the portion of the city described by the Bothell police department as having a high
occurrence of drug-related activity which has been declared an area to be included in a Stay Out of Drug Area
order.
E. “Imitation controlled substance” means a substance that is not a controlled substance, but which by
appearance or representation would lead a reasonable person to believe that the substance is a controlled
substance. Appearance includes, but is not limited to, color, shape, and size markings of the dosage unit.
Representation includes, but is not limited to, representations or factors of the following nature:
1. Statements made by the person who owns or controls the substance regarding its nature,
use or effect;
2. Statements made to the recipient that the substance can be resold for inordinate profit; or
3. Packing of the substance in a manner normally used for illicit controlled substances, such as
but not limited to folded paper bundles, cellophane packages, aluminum foil balls or squares,
35 mm film canisters, zip-lock plastic baggies, two-inch glass vials, rubber balloons, bindles, or
condoms.
F. “Known unlawful drug user, possessor or seller” means a person who has, to the knowledge of the arresting
officer, within one year prior to the date of his or her arrest for violation of this chapter, been convicted of any
infraction or crime involving the use, possession or sale of any drug, legend drug, controlled substance, or
imitation controlled substance, either in any court in Washington State, or in the courts of any other state; or
1. Who is displaying the physical characteristics of use of any drug, legend drug, or controlled
substance, such as poor coordination, slurred speech, needle marks on the body, constricted
pupils or dilated pupils; or
2. Who is in possession of drug paraphernalia as defined in BMC 9.11.010; or
3. Who is the subject of an order prohibiting his or her presence in a prohibited area.
G. “Legend drug” means drugs which are required by Washington State statutes or administrative regulations,
or regulations of the State Board of Pharmacy, to be dispensed on prescription only, or are restricted to use only
Page 140 of 244
Bothell Municipal Code
2
by health care practitioners licensed by the state of Washington (including physicians under Chapter 18.71 RCW,
osteopaths under Chapter 18.57 RCW, dentists under Chapter 18.32 RCW, podiatrists under Chapter 18.22
RCW, veterinarians under Chapter 18.92 RCW, registered nurses under Chapter 18.79 RCW, osteopaths’
assistants under Chapter 18.57A RCW, physicians’ assistants under Chapter 18.71A RCW, or pharmacists under
Chapter 18.64 RCW, or pharmacies, hospitals or institutions licensed to distribute, dispense, conduct research
with, or administer legend drugs to persons in the course of professional practice or research in the state).
H. “Loiter” means to stand about or to proceed with many stops. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.020 Orders – Conditions.
Any judge or judge pro tempore of the Bothell municipal court may issue written orders to criminal defendants
describing conditions of their pretrial release or the post-conviction conditions of suspension or deferral of their
sentences. Orders must be substantially in the form described in this chapter. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.030 Person subject to court order defined.
As used in this chapter, “person subject to court order” means any person who is subject to an order issued
under this chapter. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.040 Stay Out of Drug Areas orders – Issuance – Other court orders.
A. Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a condition of pretrial release and/or
deferral or suspension of sentence that the defendant stay out of areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking
shall be hereinafter referred to as a “SODA” (“Stay Out of Drug Areas”) order.
B. SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of possession of drug paraphernalia,
manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia, delivery of drug paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug
paraphernalia to another person, solicitation of a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, or any of
the aforementioned crimes that occur within a drug-free zone or a prohibited area.
C. Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from issuing an order pursuant to this
chapter that is not specifically a SODA order. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.050 Prohibited areas – Designation – Modification and termination.
A. Whenever an order is issued under this chapter, the subject of the order may be ordered to stay out of
certain areas that are set forth within the written order. These areas will hereinafter be referred to as “prohibited
areas.”
B. Prohibited areas that are set forth in SODA orders shall be established by a resolution of the city council, at
a minimum of every two years. The police department shall provide information to the city council to support
establishment and/or the elimination of prohibited areas in the form of one or more declarations and/or other
sworn testimony. The declaration(s) and/or other sworn testimony shall:
1. Be by declarant(s) familiar with areas of the city that suffer a high incidence of drug trafficking
activity;
2. Set forth the education, experience and other relevant qualifications of the declarant(s);
3. Set forth the basis for proposing prohibited areas, e.g., crime mapping data or other
information;
4. Describe the proposed prohibited areas; and
5. Provide other information that supports the council’s review and determination of prohibited
areas.
C. Prohibited areas that are set forth in orders issued under this chapter other than SODA orders may be set
by court discretion and are not required to be set in accordance with subsection B of this section.
D. Upon request for modification or termination of any order issued under this chapter, the court shall consider
the requested modification or termination by allowing for a process by which the subject of the order can provide
relevant testimony or other evidence in support of his/her request.
E. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order issued under this chapter shall have as its termination date
two years from the date of its issuance.
F. Whenever an order is issued, modified or terminated pursuant to this chapter, the clerk of the court shall
forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to the Bothell police department. Upon receipt of
the copy of the order, the Bothell police department shall enter the order until the expiration date specified on the
order into any computer-based criminal intelligence information system(s) available to Bothell police officers.
Upon receipt of notice that an order has been terminated, the Bothell police department shall remove the order
from the computer-based criminal intelligence information system(s).
Page 141 of 244
Bothell Municipal Code
3
G. Nothing in any provision of this chapter related to SODA orders shall be construed as prohibiting the subject
of a SODA order from participating in a scheduled court hearing or from attending a scheduled meeting with
his/her legal counsel within a prohibited area. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.060 Stay Out of Drug Areas – Defined boundaries.
All zones are identified starting at the northwest corner and move clockwise from that point. Unless specified,
zone borders include both sides of the street, immediately adjoining sidewalks, alleys, and properties. All adjacent
parks are included in the zone.
A. SR527 and Maltby Road SODA.
East from the intersection of SR527 (Bothell-Everett Hwy) and SR524 (Maltby Road)
to the east property line of 2020 Maltby.
South along the property line of 2020 Maltby, and 21045 Bothell-Everett HWY (SR527),
continuing around the easterly edge of the paved impervious surface to 20th Ave SE.
Continuing south on 20th Ave SE to the Private Road on the south side of 21221 &
21225 Bothell-Everett Hwy.
West along the Private Road to SR527.
North on SR 527 to ST 524.
B. SR527 and 220th Street SE SODA.
East from the intersection of SR527 (Bothell-Everett Hwy) and 220th St SE to 17th Ave
SE.
South on 17th Ave SE to the south property line of 22122 17th Ave SE.
West along the south property line of 22122 17th Ave SE to SR527.
Page 142 of 244
Bothell Municipal Code
4
North on SR527 to 220th St SE.
(Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.070 Drug loitering prohibited.
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any prohibited area, thoroughfare, place open to the public,
or any public or private place for the purpose of engaging in drug-related activity, which activity is in violation of
Chapter 69.41 RCW (regarding legend drugs), Chapter 69.50 RCW (the Uniform Controlled Substances Act), or
Chapter 69.52 RCW (regarding imitation controlled substances).
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether the person’s manner or
circumstance manifests an intent to engage in unlawful drug-related activities include:
1. The Place. The area where the person is loitering has been designated as a prohibited area;
or the premises involved have been reported, to the knowledge of law enforcement officers, to be
a place suspected of illegal drug-related activity; and
2. The Vehicle Involved. Any motor vehicle involved is registered to a known unlawful drug user,
possessor, or seller, or a person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for arrest for a crime
involving unlawful drug-related activity; and
3. The Person. The person loitering is:
a. A known unlawful drug user; or
b. The person is acting as a “lookout” by repeatedly leading, directing or responding to
others for no obvious lawful purpose; or
c. The person repeatedly transfers objects or packages for currency in a furtive fashion
other than in a retail transaction licensed under the business and occupation and sales tax
ordinances of the city; or
Page 143 of 244
Bothell Municipal Code
5
d. The person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself, herself or some object that
reasonably could be involved in unlawful drug-related activity; or
e. The person is known by law enforcement officers to be a member of a “gang” or
association that is known by law enforcement officers to be engaged in illegal drug activity;
or
f. The person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer; or
g. The person is currently subject to an order prohibiting his/her presence in a high drug
activity geographic area; or
h. The person displays physical characteristics of drug intoxication or usage, such as
“needle tracks”; or
i. The person possesses drug paraphernalia as defined in BMC 9.11.010. (Ord. 2218 § 1
(Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.080 Chapter cumulative.
The provisions of this chapter are intended to be cumulative and do not expressly or impliedly repeal any other
ordinance involving the same subject matter. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
9.04.090 Penalties.
A. Written orders issued under this chapter shall contain the court’s directives and shall bear the legend:
WARNING: Violation of this order subjects the violator to arrest under Chapter 9.04 of
the Bothell Municipal Code and shall constitute a separate criminal offense and may
result in imposition of suspended or deferred jail time and/or fine.
B. Penalties. A person who knowingly and willfully disobeys a SODA (“Stay Out of Drug Areas”) order issued
under this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. Any person who violates any other provisions of this chapter
is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. (Ord. 2218 § 1 (Exh. A), 2017).
Page 144 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 2218 (2017)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL, WASHINGTON, CREATING CHAPTER
9.04 OF THE BOTHELL MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING "STAY OUT OF DRUG
AREAS" (SODA) AND OTHER DRUG RELATED ACTIVITY TO ESTBLISH
REGULATIONS FOR THE ISSUANACE AND ENFORCEMENT OF COURT -ISSUED
SODA ORDERS AND TO CRIMINALIZE OTHER DRUG RELATED ACTIVITIES.
WHEREAS, the Bothell Municipal Code, Chapter 9.01, provides for the
prosecution of various criminal offenses within the City of Bothell; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that local businesses, property owners, and
the Bothell Police Department have reported an increase of criminal activity in certain
areas of the City which seriously impacts the quality of life and the standard of
commercial activity within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the increase in criminal activity is directly
linked to the illegal sale, possession, and use of drugs controlled by Washington's
Uniform Substance Control Act, Chapter 69.50 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that because this Ordinance will
assist the criminal justice system in dealing with drug-related criminal activity, it would
be in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of
Bothell to place geographic restrictions on certain violators with respect to illegal drug-
related activity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to designate limited geographic areas of the
City as "Stay Out of Drug Areas" (SODAs), recognizing that, in addition to the
predetermined SODA areas, superior and district court judges may, on a case-by-case
basis, issue orders with prohibited areas for defendants that are different than these
legislatively -determined SODAs; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with these designations, the City Council deems it
appropriate to adopt regulations for the enforcement of SODAs and penalties for
violations of court -issued SODA orders; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with these designations, the City Council deems it
appropriate to adopt regulations relating to other drug related activity, such as loitering
with the intent to engage in drug related activities.
Page 1 of 4 2218 (2017)
Page 145 of 244
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A new chapter of the Bothell Municipal Code, Chapter 9.04 BMC,
regarding "Stay Out of Drug Areas," as set forth herein and in Exhibit A is hereby
created.
Section 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and
shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary
thereof consisting of the title.
Section 4. CORRECTIONS. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance
are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited
to, the correction of scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering,
section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
LAURA HATHA Y
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BYRNE
INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED:
ANDREW J.RHEAUME
MAYOR
Page 2 of 4 2218 (2017)
Page 146 of 244
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 02/02/2017
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 02/07/2017
PUBLISHED: 02110/2017
EFFECTIVE DATE: 02/15/2017
ORDINANCE NO.: 2218 (2016)
Page 3 of 4 2218 (2017)
Page 147 of 244
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2218 (2017)
City of Bothell, Washington
On the 7th day of February, 2017, the City Council of the City of Bothell
passed Ordinance No. 2218 (2017). A summary of the content of said Ordinance,
consisting of the title, is provided as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL, WASHINGTON, CREATING CHAPTER
9.04 OF THE BOTHELL MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING "STAY OUT OF DRUG
AREAS' (SODA) AND OTHER DRUG RELATED ACTIVITY TO ESTBLISH
REGULATIONS FOR THE ISSUANACE AND ENFORCEMENT OF COURT -ISSUED
SODA ORDERS AND TO CRIMINALIZE OTHER DRUG RELATED ACTIVITIES.
The full tent of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 02/02/2017
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 02/07/2017
PUBLISHED: 02/10/2017
EFFECTIVE DATE: 02/15/2017
ORDINANCE NO.: 2218 (2017)
Page 4 of 4 2218 (2017)
Page 148 of 244
EXHIBIT A to ORDINANCE 2218
New Chapter 9.04
Stay Out of Drug Areas
9.04.010 Definitions
A. "Controlled substances" means a drug, substance, or its immediate precursor, listed
in Schedule I, II, III, or IV of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Chapter 69_50
RCW.
B. "Drug' means:
1. Substances recognized as drugs in the official U.S. pharmacopoeia, official
homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official national formulary,
or any supplement to any of them; or
2. Substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or
prevention of diseases in humans or animals; or
3. Substances affecting or intended to affect the structure or any function of the
body of humans or animals, except for food, and except for vitamins and minerals
approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use as minerals and
vitamins.
C. 'Drug-related activity" means any of the following:
1. Administering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances,
whether by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means, to oneself or to
another person; or
2. Delivering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances by
the actual, constructive or attempted transfer of drugs, controlled substances or
imitation controlled substances from one person to another; or
3. Distributing drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances by
transferring or arranging for their transfer other than by administering or
delivering them.
D. 'Prohibited area' means the portion of the city described by the Bothell police
department as having a high occurrence of drug related activity which has been
declared an area to be included in a Stay Out of Drug Area order.
E. "Imitation controlled substance" means a substance that is not a controlled
substance, but which by appearance or representation would lead a reasonable person
to believe that the substance is a controlled substance. Appearance includes, but is not
limited to, color, shape, and size markings of the dosage unit. Representation includes,
but is not limited to, representations or factors of the following nature:
1 of 8 Exhibit to 2218 (2017)
Page 149 of 244
1. Statements made by the person who owns or controls the substance regarding
its nature, use or effect;
2. Statements made to the recipient that the substance can be resold for
inordinate profit; or
3. Packing of the substance in a manner normally used for illicit controlled
substances, such as but not limited to folded paper bundles, cellophane
packages, aluminum foil balls or squares, 35 mm film canisters, zip -lock plastic
baggies, two-inch glass vials, rubber balloons, bindles, or condoms.
F. "Known unlawful drug user, possessor or seller" means a person who has, to the
knowledge of the arresting officer, within one year prior to the date of his or her arrest for
violation of this chapter, been convicted of any infraction or crime involving the use,
possession or sale of any drug, legend drug, controlled substance, or imitation
controlled substance, either in any court in Washington State, or in the courts of any
other state; or
Who is displaying the physical characteristics of use of any drug, legend drug, or
controlled substance, such as poor coordination, slurred speech, needle marks on the
body, constricted pupils or dilated pupils; or
Who is in possession of drug paraphernalia as defined in BMC 9.11.010 or
Who is the subject of an order prohibiting his or her presence in a prohibited area.
G. "Legend drug" means drugs which are required by Washington State statutes or
administrative regulations, or regulations of the State Board of Pharmacy, to be
dispensed on prescription only, or are restricted to use only by health care practitioners
licensed by the state of Washington (including physicians under Chapter 18.71 RCW,
osteopaths under Chapter 18_57 RCW, dentists under Chapter 18_32 RCW, podiatrists
under Chapter 18_22 RCW, veterinarians under Chapter 18_92 RCW, registered nurses
under Chapter 18_79 RCW, osteopaths' assistants under Chapter 18.57A RCW,
physicians' assistants under Chapter 18.71A RCW, or pharmacists under Chapter 18_64
RCW, or pharmacies, hospitals or institutions licensed to distribute, dispense, conduct
research with, or administer legend drugs to persons in the course of professional
practice or research in the state).
H. "Loiter' means to stand about or to proceed with many stops.
9.04.020 Orders -Conditions.
Any judge orjudge pro tempore of the Bothell Municipal Court may issue written orders
to criminal defendants describing conditions of their pretrial release or the post-
conviction conditions of suspension or deferral of their sentences. Orders must be
substantially in the form described in this chapter.
2 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 150 of 244
9.04.030 Person subject to court order defined.
As used in this chapter, "person subject to court order' means any person who is subject
to an order issued under Chapter 9.04 BMC.
9.04.040 Stay out of drug areas orders - Issuance - Other court orders.
A. Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a condition of
pretrial release and/or deferral or suspension of sentence that the defendant stay out of
areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking shall be hereinafter referred to as a
SODA" ("Stay Out of Drug Areas") order.
B. SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of possession of
drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia, delivery of drug
paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to another person,
solicitation of a violation of the uniform controlled substance act, or any of the
aforementioned crimes that occur within a drug-free zone or a prohibited area.
C. Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from issuing an
order pursuant to this chapter that is not specifically a SODA order.
9.04.050 Prohibited areas - Designation - Modification and termination.
A. Whenever an order is issued under this chapter, the subject of the order may be
ordered to stay out of certain areas that are set forth within the written order. These
areas will hereinafter be referred to as "prohibited areas."
B. Prohibited areas that are set forth in SODA orders shall be established by a
resolution of the city council, at a minimum of every two years. The police department
shall provide information to the city council to support establishment and/or the
elimination of prohibited areas in the form of one or more declarations and/or other
sworn testimony. The declaration(s) and/or other sworn testimony shall:
1. Be by declarant(s) familiar with areas of the city that suffer a high incidence of
drug trafficking activity;
2. Set forth the education, experience and other relevant qualifications of the
declarant(s);
3. Set forth the basis for proposing prohibited areas, e.g., crime mapping data or
other information;
4. Describe the proposed prohibited areas; and
5. Provide other information that supports the council's review and determination
of prohibited areas.
C. Prohibited areas that are set forth in orders issued under this chapter other than
SODA orders may be set by court discretion and are not required to be set in
accordance with subsection (B) of this section.
3 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 151 of 244
D. Upon request for modification or termination of any order issued under this chapter,
the court shall consider the requested modification or termination by allowing for a
process by which the subject of the order can provide relevant testimony or other
evidence in support of his/her request.
E. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order issued under this chapter shall have
as its termination date two years from the date of its issuance.
F. Whenever an order is issued, modified or terminated pursuant to this chapter, the
clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to
the Bothell Police Department. Upon receipt of the copy of the order, the Bothell Police
Department shall enter the order until the expiration date specified on the order into any
computer-based criminal intelligence information system(s) available to Bothell police
officers. Upon receipt of notice that an order has been terminated, the Bothell police
department shall remove the order from the computer-based criminal intelligence
information system(s).
G. Nothing in any provision of this chapter related to SODA orders shall be construed as
prohibiting the subject of a SODA order from participating in a scheduled court hearing
or from attending a scheduled meeting with his/her legal counsel within a prohibited
area.
9.04.060 Stay out of Drug areas - Defined Boundaries.
All zones are identified starting at the northwest corner and move clockwise from that
point. Unless specified, zone borders include both sides of the street, immediately
adjoining sidewalks, alleys, and properties. All adjacent parks are included in the zone.
A. SR527 & Maltby Road SODA
East from the intersection of SR527 (Bothell -Everett Hwy) and SR524 (Maltby Road) to
the east property line of 2020 Maltby.
South along the property line of 2020 Maltby, and 21045 Bothell -Everett HWY (SR527),
continuing around the easterly edge of the paved impervious surface to 20th Ave SE.
Continuing south on 20th Ave SE to the Private Road on the south side of 21221 &
21225 Bothell -Everett Hwy.
West along the Private Road to SR527.
North on SR 527 to ST 524.
4 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 152 of 244
B. SR527 & 220th ST SE SODA
East from the intersection of SR527 (Bothell -Everett Hwy) and 22P St SE to 17th Ave
SE.
South on 17th Ave SE to the south property line of 22122 17th Ave SE.
West along the south property line of 22122 17th Ave SE to SR527.
North on SR527 to 220th St SE.
5 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 153 of 244
9.04.070 Drug loitering prohibited.
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any prohibited area, thoroughfare,
place open to the public, or any public or private place for the purpose of engaging in
drug-related activity, which activity is in violation of Chapter 69_41 RCW (regarding
legend drugs), Chapter 69_50 RCW (The Uniform Controlled Substances Act), or
Chapter 69_52 RCW (regarding imitation controlled substances).
6 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 154 of 244
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether the
person's manner or circumstance manifests an intent to engage in unlawful drug-related
activities include:
1. The Place. The area where the person is loitering has been designated as a
prohibited area; or the premises involved have been reported, to the knowledge
of law enforcement officers, to be a place suspected of illegal drug-related
activity; and
2. The Vehicle Involved. Any motor vehicle involved is registered to a known
unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller, or a person for whom there is an
outstanding warrant for arrest for a crime involving unlawful drug-related activity;
and
3. The Person. The person loitering is:
a. A known unlawful drug user; or
b. The person is acting as a "lookout" by repeatedly leading, directing or
responding to others for no obvious lawful purpose; or
c. The person repeatedly transfers objects or packages for currency in a
furtive fashion other than in a retail transaction licensed under the
business and occupation and sales tax ordinances of the city; or
d. The person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself, herself or some
object that reasonably could be involved in unlawful drug-related activity;
or
e. The person is known by law enforcement officers to be a member of a
gang" or association that is known by law enforcement officers to be
engaged in illegal drug activity; or
f. The person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer; or
g. The person is currently subject to an order prohibiting his/her presence
in a high drug activity geographic area; or
h. The person displays physical characteristics of drug intoxication or
usage, such as "needle tracks"; or
I. The person possesses drug paraphernalia as defined in BMC 10.11.010.
9.04.080 Chapter cumulative.
The provisions of this chapter are intended to be cumulative and do not expressly or
impliedly repeal any other ordinance involving the same subject matter.
7 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 155 of 244
9.04.090 Penalties
A. Written orders issued under this chapter shall contain the court's directives and shall
bear the legend:
WARNING: Violation of this order subjects the violator to arrest under Chapter 9.04 of
the Bothell Municipal Code and shall constitute a separate criminal offense and may
result in imposition of suspended or deferred jail time and/or fine.
B. Penalties. A person who knowingly and willfully disobeys a SODA ("Stay Out of Drug
Areas") order issued under this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. Any person
who violates any other provisions of this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
8 of 8 Exhibit A to 2218 (2017)
Page 156 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 2226 (2017)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER
9.04 OF THE BOTHELL MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING "STAY OUT OF DRUG
AREAS" (SODA) AND OTHER DRUG-RELATED ACTIV/ TY.
WHEREAS, chapter 9.04 of the Bothell Municipal Code (BMC) concerns "Stay Out
of Drug Areas" (SODA) and associated procedures for ordering criminal offenders to avoid
prohibited areas; and
WHEREAS, BMC 9.04.070 makes it unlawful for any person to loiter in or near a
SODA prohibited area or any public or private place for the purpose of engaging in drug-
related activity, which is defined to include administering, delivering, or distributing drugs;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to expand the definition of drug-related
activity in order to prohibit those instances where a person is loitering while exhibiting the
effects of having consumed any drug; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 9.04 BMC authorizes the court to issue an order when a
defendant is charged with or convicted of specific drug-related crime, such as possession
or delivery of drug paraphernalia; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to expand the court's authority to issue a
SODA order to include those circumstances where a crime was committed that is not
specifically drug-related, such as theft or burglary, but the court finds that any chemical
dependency, substance abuse, or drug-related activity contributed to the offense; and
WHEREAS, BMC 9.04.060 designates two specific geographic areas of the City
as SODA prohibited areas; and
WHEREAS, BMC 9.04.050 requires that court -issued SODA orders set forth
Prohibited Areas that have been established by a resolution of the City Council at a
minimum of every two years; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have all legislatively -designated prohibited
areas listed in one document rather than have some enumerated in the Bothell Municipal
Code and others established by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to establish all current legislatively -
designated prohibited areas by separate resolution.
Page 1 of 6 Page 157 of 244
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDACN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Bothell Municipal Code 9.04.010 and the corresponding portions of
Ordinance No. 2218 § 1 are hereby amended to read as follows, with new text shown by
underline and deletions show by strikethFo g-1 ; all other provisions of these sections shall
remain unchanged and in full force:
9.04.010 Definitions.
A. "Controlled substances" means a drug, substance, or its immediate
precursor, listed in Schedule I, II, III, or IV of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act,
Chapter 69.50 RCW.
B. "Drug" means:
1. Substances recognized as drugs in the official U.S. pharmacopoeia, official
homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official national formulary, or any
supplement to any of them; or
2. Substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or
prevention of diseases in humans or animals; or
3. Substances affecting or intended to affect the structure or any function of the
body of humans or animals, except for food, and except for vitamins and minerals
approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use as minerals and vitamins.
C. "Drug-related activity" means any of the following:
1. Administering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled
substances, whether by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means, to oneself or
to another person; or
2. Delivering drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances by
the actual, constructive or attempted transfer of drugs, controlled substances or imitation
controlled substances from one person to another; or
3. Distributing drugs, controlled substances or imitation controlled substances
by transferring or arranging for their transfer other than by administering or delivering
them.
Page 2 of 6 Page 158 of 244
4. Exhibiting the effects of having consumed any drug. For purposes of this
subsection "exhibiting the effects of having consumed any drug" means that a person
by speech manner, appearance behavior, lack of coordination, or otherwise exhibits
that he or she has injected inhaled ingested or otherwise consumed any drug or that
he or she is under the influence of any drug.
D. "Prohibited area" means the portion of the city described by the Bothell
police department as having a high occurrence of drug-related activity which has been
declared an area to be included in a Stay Out of Drug Area order.
E. "Imitation controlled substance" means a substance that is not a controlled
substance, but which by appearance or representation would lead a reasonable person
to believe that the substance is a controlled substance. Appearance includes, but is not
limited to, color, shape, and size markings of the dosage unit. Representation includes,
but is not limited to, representations or factors of the following nature:
1. Statements made by the person who owns or controls the substance
regarding its nature, use or effect;
2. Statements made to the recipient that the substance can be resold for
inordinate profit; or
3. Packing of the substance in a manner normally used for illicit controlled
substances, such as but not limited to folded paper bundles, cellophane packages,
aluminum foil balls or squares, 35 mm film canisters, zip-lock plastic baggies, two-inch
glass vials, rubber balloons, bindles, or condoms.
F. "Known unlawful drug user, possessor or seller" means a person who has, to
the knowledge of the arresting officer, within one year prior to the date of his or her
arrest for violation of this chapter, been convicted of any infraction or crime involving the
use, possession or sale of any drug, legend drug, controlled substance, or imitation
controlled substance, either in any court in Washington State, or in the courts of any
other state; or
1. Who is displaying the physical characteristics of use of any drug, legend
drug, or controlled substance, such as poor coordination, slurred speech, needle marks
on the body, constricted pupils or dilated pupils; or
2. Who is in possession of drug paraphernalia as defined in BMC 9.11.010; or
3. Who is the subject of an order prohibiting his or her presence in a prohibited
area.
Page 3 of 6 Page 159 of 244
G. "Legend drug" means drugs which are required by Washington State
statutes or administrative regulations, or regulations of the State Board of Pharmacy, to
be dispensed on prescription only, or are restricted to use only by health care
practitioners licensed by the state of Washington (including physicians under Chapter
18.71 RCW, osteopaths under Chapter 18.57 RCW, dentists under Chapter 18.32
RCW, podiatrists under Chapter 18.22 RCW, veterinarians under Chapter 18.92 RCW,
registered nurses under Chapter 18.79 RCW, osteopaths' assistants under Chapter
18.57A RCW, physicians' assistants under Chapter 18.71A RCW, or pharmacists under
Chapter 18.64 RCW, or pharmacies, hospitals or institutions licensed to distribute,
dispense, conduct research with, or administer legend drugs to persons in the course of
professional practice or research in the state).
R. "Loiter" means to stand about or to proceed with many stops.
Section 2. Bothell Municipal Code 9.04.040 and the corresponding portions of
Ordinance No. 2218 § 1 are hereby amended to read as follows; all other provisions of
these sections shall remain unchanged and in full force:
9.04.040 Stay Out of Drug Areas orders - Issuance - Other court orders.
A. Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a
condition of pretrial release and/or deferral or suspension of sentence that the defendant
stay out of areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking shall be hereinafter referred
to as a "SODA" ("Stay Out of Drug Areas") order.
B. SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of
possession of drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia, delivery
of drug paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to another person,
solicitation of a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, or any of the
aforementioned crimes that occur within a drug-free zone or a prohibited area.
C. SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of any
offense if the court finds that reasonable grounds exist to believe that any chemical
dependency, substance abuse or drug-related activity contributed to the offense.
D. Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from
issuing an order pursuant to this chapter that is not specifically a SODA order.
Section 3. Bothell Municipal Code 9.04.060 and the corresponding portions of
Ordinance No. 2218 § 1 are repealed.
Section 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,
sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Page 4 of 6 Page 160 of 244
Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1,
2018, after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title as required by law.
Section 6. CORRECTIONS. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to,
the correction of scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering,
section/subsection numbers, and any references thereto.
APPROVED:
AN J. RHEAUME
MAYOR
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAU I.--BYA E
CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 09/26/2017
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 10/03/2017
PUBLISHED: 10/06/2017
EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/01/2018
ORDINANCE NO.: 2226 (2017)
Page 5 of 6 Page 161 of 244
City of Bothell, Washington
On the 3rd day of October, 2017, the City Council of the City of Bothell passed
Ordinance No. 2226 (2017). A summary of the content of said Ordinance, consisting of the
title, is provided as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER
9.04 OF THE BOTHELL MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING "STAY OUT OF DRUG
AREAS" (SODA) AND OTHER DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed y0on request.
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 09/26/2017
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 10/03/2017
PUBLISHED: 10/06/2017
EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/01/2018
ORDINANCE NO.: 2226 (2017)
Page 6 of 6 Page 162 of 244
City of Everett Municipal Code
Chapter 10.37
LOITERING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENGAGING IN DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY
Sections:
10.37.010 Prohibited.
10.37.020 Violation—Penalty.
10.37.010 Prohibited.
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any thoroughfare, place open to the public,
or near any public or private place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose to
engage in drug-related activity contrary to any of the provisions of RCW Chapters 69.41, 69.50 or 69.52.
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such purpose is
manifested, but not limited thereto, are:
1. Such person is a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller. For purposes of this chapter,
a “known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller” is a person who has, within the knowledge of the
arresting officer, been convicted in any court within this state of any violation involving the use, possession
or sale of any of the substances referred to in RCW Chapters 69.41, 69.50 and 69.52, or such person has
been convicted of any violation of any of the provisions of the RCW or substantially similar laws of any
political subdivision of this state or of any other state; or a person who displays physical characteristics of
drug intoxication or usage, such as needle tracks; or a person who possesses drug paraphernalia as defined
in Chapter 5.112 of this code;
2. Such person is currently subject to an order prohibiting his/her presence in a high drug activity
geographic area;
3. Such person behaves in such a manner as to raise a reasonable suspicion that he or she is
about to engage in or is then engaged in an unlawful drug-related activity, including by way of example
only, such person acting as a lookout;
4. Such person is physically identified by the officer as a member of a gang, or association which
has as its purpose illegal drug activity;
5. Such person transfers small objects or packages for currency in a furtive fashion;
6. Such person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer;
7. Such person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or herself or any object which reasonably
could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity;
8. The area involved is by public repute known to be an area of unlawful drug use and trafficking;
9. The premises involved are known to have been reported to law enforcement as a place
suspected of drug activity pursuant to RCW Chapter 69.52;
10. Any vehicle involved is registered to a known unlawful drug user, possessor or seller, or a
person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity. (Ord. 1560-
89 §§ 1 (part), 2, 1989)
10.37.020 Violation—Penalty.
Any person who violates the provisions of this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. (Ord.
1560-89 §§ 1 (part), 3, 1989)
Page 163 of 244
Lakewood Municipal Code 1
Chapter 9A.06
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
Sections:
9A.06.010 Loitering With the Intent of Engaging in Drug-Related Activity.
9A.06.020 Designation of Anti-Drug Emphasis Areas.
9A.06.030 Violation of Conditions of Release, Suspension or Deferral as Separate Crime.
9A.06.040 Places of Illegal Drug Activity Declared Public Nuisances.
9A.06.050 Evidence of Use for Illegal Drug Purposes.
9A.06.060 Conviction as Prima Facie Evidence.
9A.06.070 Penalties for Maintenance of Public Nuisance.
9A.06.080 Violation - Penalty.
9A.06.010 Loitering With the Intent of Engaging in Drug-Related Activity.
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any thoroughfare, place open to the public, or
near any public or private place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the intent to engage in
drug-related activity contrary to any of the pro-visions of Chapters 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW.
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such intent is
manifested are the following:
1. Such person is a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller. For purposes of this chapter,
a “known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller” is a person who has been convicted in any court within
this state of any violation involving the use, possession, or sale of any of the substances referred to in
Chapters 69.41, 69.50, and 69.52 RCW, or substantially similar laws of any political subdivision of this state
or of any other state; or who is known to have been arrested for a drug related violation not resulting in
a conviction because the person participated in a diversionary program, deferral program, Drug Court or
a similar program; or a person who displays physical characteristics of drug intoxication or usage, such as
“needle tracks”; or who possesses marijuana in a manner not authorized by RCW 69.50.4013 (1), RCW
69.50.4013 (2) and or in amounts that exceed those set forth in RCW 69.50.360(3);
2. Such person is currently subject to an order from any court prohibiting his/her presence in a
high drug activity geographic area;
3. Such person behaves in such a manner as to raise a reasonable suspicion that he or she is about
to engage in or is then engaged in an unlawful drug-related activity, including by way of example only,
such person acting as a “lookout”;
4. Such person is physically identified by the officer, based on articulable factors, as a member of
a “gang,” or association which has as its purpose illegal drug activity. Factors that support an officer
physically identifying a person as a member of such a gang or association include, but are not limited to
clothing, tattoos, known association and/or affiliation with such gang or association, specific and observed
acts or circumstances consistent with drug related activity, and gestures, signs, greetings and movements
that are consistent with gang related activity, Provided that clothing alone shall not be sufficient, without
more, to support an officer physically identifying a person as a member of such a gang or association;
5. Such person transfers small objects or packages for currency in a furtive fashion;
6. Such person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer;
7. Such person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or herself or any object which reasonably
could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity;
8. The area involved is by public repute known to be an area of unlawful drug use and trafficking;
9. The premises involved are known to have been reported to law enforcement as a place
suspected of drug activity pursuant to Chapter 69.52 RCW;
Page 164 of 244
Lakewood Municipal Code 2
10. Any vehicle involved is registered to a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller, or a
person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity. (Ord. 573 §
6, 2013; Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.020 Designation of Anti-Drug Emphasis Areas.
A. Certain areas of the City shall be designated as and identified to be anti-drug emphasis areas
based on the repeat incidents of illegal drug activities occurring therein, and enhanced penalties shall be
applied in event of conviction of unlawful drug related acts or loitering for drug purposes, within the said
areas. The areas to be so designated shall be identified by the City Council in an Ordinance or Resolution
passed after consultation with the City Manager, City Attorney and the chief law enforcement officer of
the City, and the list identifying such areas shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Additional
areas may also be identified by the Judge of the Municipal or District Court hearing drug related cases
arising from within the City. If a defendant is convicted of a drug related case occurring from within an
area designated as an anti-drug emphasis area, a condition or term of sentence, deferral, or suspension,
shall be that such defendant shall stay out of all areas of the City designated as an anti-drug emphasis
areas, unless there are significant and substantial extenuating circumstances in the defendant's particular
case justifying avoidance of the requirement for such condition or term of sentence, deferral, or
suspension. In such case, the significant and substantial extenuating circumstances shall be identified and
recited in the record of the case.
B. The following areas are hereby designated as and identified to be anti-drug emphasis areas:
Area A. South Tacoma Way/pacific Highway Southwest Business District:
Starting at the northern edge of 80th Street Southwest and extending 300 feet to the east and
300 feet to the west of the centerline of South Tacoma Way and following South Tacoma Way to
Pacific Highway Southeast then south on Pacific Highway Southwest 300 feet to the west of the
center of Pacific Highway Southwest and to the perimeter fence for the southbound lanes of
Interstate 5 to the east and extending to the southeastern corner of the intersection of Gravelly
Lake Drive Southwest and Pacific Highway Southwest.
Area B. Tillicum Area:
Starting at the place where American Lake and Washington State National Guard Camp Murray
(State Military Encampment Grounds as filed with Pierce County Auditor on 21 June 1921)
intersect then northeasterly along shore of American Lake to place where northwestern border
of Harry Todd County Park and American Lake intersect then northeasterly along the northern
border of Harry Todd County Park to the place where North Thorne Lane Southwest and Harry
Todd County Park intersect then 300 feet northeasterly of the center of North Thorne Lane
Southwest and proceeding southeasterly along said 300 foot buffer along North Thorne Lane
Southwest to the place where the perimeter fence of southbound Interstate 5 intersect and then
proceeding in a southwesterly direction along the perimeter fence of the southbound lanes of
Interstate 5 to the place where southwestern point of the perimeter fence of the southbound
lanes of Interstate 5 and southeastern boundary of Washington State National Guards Camp
Murray intersect (also known as the westerly right of way of Berkeley Street SW) then
northwesterly along said right of way of Berkeley Street SW to the south line of the north half of
Section 21, Township 19N, range 2E, WM then west along said south line a distance of 685 feet
more or less to the southeasterly right of way line of Washington Ave. SW being on the boundary
of Washington State National Guard Camp Murray then northeasterly on said right of way of
Page 165 of 244
Lakewood Municipal Code 3
Washington Ave. SW to the southwesterly right of way of Boundary St SW according to the Plat
of "American Lake Addition" to Pierce County as file with the Pierce County Auditor on Oct 2, 1908
then northwesterly along said southwesterly right of way of Boundary St SW to southeasterly right
of way line of Military Ave. SW then southwesterly along said southeasterly right of way of Military
Ave. SW to the southwesterly right of way line of Stanley St SW also being the turning point on
the Washington State National Guard Camp Murray boundary then northwesterly along said
southwesterly right of way line of Stanley St SW to the northwesterly right of way line of
Woodlawn Ave. SW said point being a turning point on the Washington State National Guard
Camp Murray boundary then southwesterly on a bearing of 49 degrees 38' 30" west 150 feet
more of less being an extension of said northwesterly right of way line of Woodlawn Ave. SW to
a turning point on the Washington State National Guard Camp Murray boundary then
northwesterly on a bearing of 40 degrees 04' 35" west along the northeasterly boundary of
Washington State National Guard Camp Murray to place where northeasterly boundary of
Washington State National Guard Camp Murray and American Lake intersect.
Area C. Bridgeport Way Southwest Area:
Starting at the northern edge of the intersection of Gravelly Lake Drive Southwest and Bridgeport
Way Southwest and then extending 300 feet to the east and 300 to the west of the center of
Bridgeport Way Southwest from Gravelly Lake Drive Southwest to the western edge of the
Southbound Interstate 5.
Area D. Lakeview Area:
Starting at the northern edge of 100th Street Southwest starting at the northwest corner of the
intersection of Bridgeport Way Southwest and 100th Street Southwest and proceeding south to
Pacific Highway Southwest and then northeasterly to the intersection of Pacific Highway
Southwest and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and then north on the western edge of
the Burlington Northern railroad tracks to the intersection of the Burlington Northern Railroad
tracks and 100th Street Southwest and then westerly along the northern edge of 100th Street
Southwest to the northwest corner of 100th Street Southwest and Bridgeport Way Southwest.
Area E. McChord Gate Area:
Starting at the southern intersection of New York Street Southwest and the perimeter fence of
the northbound lanes of Interstate 5 and then proceeding along the north side of the McChord
Air Force Base fence to the Burlington Northern railroad track and then northerly along the
western edge of the Burlington Northern railroad track to a point where the railroad track
intersect with the perimeter fence of the northbound lanes of Interstate 5 and then southwesterly
to the southern intersection of New York Street Southwest and the Perimeter fence.
Area F. Woodbrook Area:
Starting at the northwest corner of the intersection on North Thorne Lane and the southern
boundary of McChord Air Force Base and then extending south along the western edge of 80th
Avenue Southwest (Murray Road) to the southwestern point where 80th Avenue Southwest
(Murray Road) and the Fort Lewis Logistics Center intersect and then east along the northern
boundary of the Fort Lewis Logistics Center parallel to 150th Street Southwest to the place where
Page 166 of 244
Lakewood Municipal Code 4
McChord Air Force Base and Ft. Lewis Army base intersect and then north along the eastern
boundary of McChord Air Force Base parallel to Woodbrook Drive Southwest and then west along
the southern boundary of McChord Air Force Base Housing to the intersection of McChord Air
Force Base and North Thorne Lane Southwest. (Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.030 Violation of Conditions of Release, Suspension or Deferral as Separate Crime.
A. The presence of any person within an anti-drug emphasis area in violation of court-imposed
conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral of any sentence shall constitute a separate
crime hereby designated a gross misdemeanor and any such person may be apprehended and arrested
without the necessity for any warrant or additional court order. Upon conviction, any person so violating
the conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral shall be punished by imprisonment in jail
for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than one (1) year, or by a fine in an amount fixed by
the court of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and fine.
(Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.040 Places of Illegal Drug Activity Declared Public Nuisances.
Any building, structure or place within the City used for drug related activity or for loitering with
the intent of engaging in drug-related activity as defined in this Chapter is hereby declared to be a public
nuisance. (Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.050 Evidence of Use for Illegal Drug Purposes.
A. Two or more criminal convictions of persons for drug related offenses in a building, structure
or place, within the one-year period preceding the commencement of an action under this Chapter shall
give rise to a rebuttable presumption that the building, structure or place has been used for illegal drug
purposes and is a public nuisance. In any action under this Chapter, evidence of the common fame and
general reputation of the building or place, of the inmates or occupants thereof, or of those resorting
thereto, shall be admissible as evidence to prove the existence of the public nuisance but must be
supported by additional evidence. Evidence of the general reputation of the building or place, or of the
inmates or occupants thereof that is sufficient to establish the existence of the public nuisance, shall be
prima facie evidence of knowledge thereof and acquiescence and participation therein and responsibility
for the nuisance by persons or legal entities having an interest in the property. Responsibility for the
nuisance shall extend to the owners, lessors, lessees and all those in interest in any form in the property,
real or personal, used in conducting or maintaining the public nuisance.
B. Evidence of cooperation by owners, agents or managers of a building or place with police
investigations or operations to control drug related activity may be used to rebut the presumptions
created in this Chapter. (Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.060 Conviction as Prima Facie Evidence.
Any conviction of any owner, manager, operator, agent or employee for any illegal drug activity,
or for loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related activity, when such offense was related to any
business or commercial enterprise, shall be prima facie evidence that the building, structure or place upon
or in which business or commercial enterprise is or was conducted, was used for illegal drug activities.
(Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.070 Penalties for Maintenance of Public Nuisance.
maintenance of a public nuisance as declared herein, in addition to any other civil or criminal
penalties, shall result in a civil penalty not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) nor more than one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for a first conviction of maintaining a public nuisance and by abatement by
Page 167 of 244
Lakewood Municipal Code 5
closure of such business or commercial enterprise for the period of thirty (30) days for each subsequent
conviction of maintaining a public nuisance. (Ord. 526 § 2 (part), 2010.)
9A.06.080 Violation - Penalty.
Unless otherwise specifically provided otherwise, any person who violates the provisions of this
Chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned in jail for a period of
up to one year or fined an amount of not more than $5,000 or both such jail time and fine. (Ord. 526 § 2
(part), 2010.)
Page 168 of 244
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville, Washington
ORDINANCE z.ggk
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON,
CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 6.28 TO THE MARYSVILLE MUNICIPAL
CODE ENTITLED "STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA) ORDERS";
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised that Washington Courts have consistently
held that the right to travel is guaranteed by the United States Constitution and that right applies
to intrastate as well as interstate travel; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that local business owners, property owners and the
Marysville Police Department reported an increase of crime in the "Stay Out of Drug Area"
(SODA) areas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the provisions of this Ordinance are necessary
for the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish predetermined SODA areas,
recognizing that, in addition to the predetermined SODA areas, Municipal Court Judges may on
a case-by-case basis issue orders with prohibited areas for defendants that are different than the
legislatively determined SODA area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it appropriate to enact legislation including SODA
areas and enforcement of SODA orders to reduce crime; not to penalize or interfere with the
Constitutional right to travel of persons in the City but instead to place reasonable geographic
restrictions, at the discretion and with oversight of elected Municipal Court Judges, upon persons
who are charged with or convicted of crimes, where orders are limited in time and to areas where
there is ongoing drug or criminal activity.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Marysville, Washington do ordain
as follows:
Section 1. A new MMC Chapter 6.28 entitled "STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA)
ORDERS" is hereby adopted to read as follows:
Chapter 6.28
"STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA) ORDERS"
Sections:
6.28.010 Orders-Conditions.
6.28.020 Person subject to court order defined.
6.28.025 Stay out of drug areas orders-Issuance-Other court orders.
6.28.030 Violation of order-Rearrest.
Ordinance Page 1 of 4
M-11-001JOrdCh 6.28 SODA 2-22-12 Page 169 of 244
6.28.040 Prohibited areas-Designation-Modification and termination.
6.28.01 0 Orders-Conditions.
Any judge or judge pro tempore of the Marysville municipal court may issue written orders
to criminal defendants describing conditions of their pretrial release or the post-conviction
conditions of suspension or deferral of their sentences. Orders must be substantially in the
form described in this chapter.
6.28.020 Person subject to court order defined.
As used in this chapter, "person subject to court order" means any person who is subject to
an order issued under Section 6.28.010.
6.28.025 Stay out of drug areas orders-Issuance-Other court orders.
(1) Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a condition of
pretrial release and/or deferral or suspension of sentence that the defendant stay out of
areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking shall be hereinafter referred to as a
"SODA" ("Stay Out of Drug Areas") order.
(2) SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of possession of
drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia, delivery of drug
paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to another person, possession
of marijuana, or any of the aforementioned crimes that occur within a drug-free zone.
(3) Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from issuing an
order pursuant to this chapter that isn't specifically a SODA order.
6.28.030 Violation of order-Rearrest.
(1) Written orders issued under this chapter shall contain the court's directives and shall
bear the legend:
WARNING: Violation of this order subjects the violator to rearrest under
Chapter 6.28 MMC and may result in imposition of suspended or
deferred jail time and/or fine.
(2) Whenever a police officer shall have probable cause to believe that a person is
subject to an order issued under this chapter and the person knows of the order, and that a
violation of the order is occurring in the officer's presence, the officer shall have the
authority to bring the person before the court wherein the order was issued, and for such
purpose may rearrest such person without warrant or other process.
6.28.040 Prohibited areas-Designation-Modification and termination.
(1) Whenever an order is issued under this chapter, the subject of the order may be
ordered to stay out of certain areas that are set forth within the written order. These areas
will hereinafter be referred to as "prohibited areas."
Ordinance Page 2 of 4
M-11-D01/0rd.Ch 6.28 SODA 2-22-12
Page 170 of 244
(2) Prohibited areas that are set forth in SODA orders shall be established by a resolution
of the city council, at a minimum of every two years. The police department shall provide
information to the city council to support establishment and/or the elimination of
prohibited areas in the form of one or more declarations and/or other sworn testimony.
The declaration(s) and/or other sworn testimony shall:
(a) Be by declarant(s) familiar with areas of the city that suffer a high incidence
of drug trafficking activity;
(b) Set forth the education, experience and other relevant qualifications of the
declarant(s);
(c) Set forth the basis for proposing prohibited areas, e.g., crime mapping data or
other information;
(d) Describe the proposed prohibited areas; and
(e) Provide other information that supports the council's review and
determination of prohibited areas.
(3) Prohibited areas that are set forth in orders issued under this chapter other than
SODA orders may be set by court discretion and are not required to be set in accordance
with subsection 2 of this section.
(4) Upon request for modification or termination of any order issued under this chapter,
the cOUl1 shall consider the requested modification or termination by allowing for a
process by which the subject of the order can provide relevant testimony or other
evidence in support of his/her request.
(5) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order issued under this chapter shall have
as its termination date two years from the date of its issuance.
(6) Whenever an order is issued, modified or terminated pursuant to this chapter, the
clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to
the Marysville police depaI1ment. Upon receipt of the copy of the order, the Marysville
police department shall enter the order until the expiration date specified on the order into
any computer-based criminal intelligence information system(s) available to Marysville
police officers. Upon receipt of notice that an order has been terminated, the Marysville
police department shall remove the order from the computer-based criminal intelligence
information system(s).
Ordinance Page 3 of 4
M-11-Q01/0rdCh 6.28 SODA 2-22-12
Page 171 of 244
(7) Nothing in any provision of this chapter related to SODA orders shall be construed as
prohibiting the subject of a SODA order from participating in a scheduled court hearing
or from attending a scheduled meeting with his/her legal counsel within a prohibited area.
Section 2. General Duty. It is expressly the purpose of this ordinance to provide for and
promote the health safety and welfare of the general public and not to create or otherwise
establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially
protected or benefited by the terms of this ordinance. It is the specific intent of this ordinance
that no provision nor any term used in this ordinance is intended to impose any duty whatsoever
upon the City or any of its officers or employees. Nothing contained in this ordinance is intended
nor shall be construed to create or form the basis of any liability on the part of the City, or its
officers, employees or agents for any injury or damage resulting from any action or inaction on
the part of the City related in any manner to the enforcement of this ordinance by its officers,
employees or agents.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of
any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective five days after the date of
its publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this / 3 t/..day of ~,2012.
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
ATTEST:
\
Approved as to form:
Byn~(<:.~
Grant Weed, City Attorney
Date of Publication: J/ty/
Effective Date (5 days after publication): ---=:;;;l.~/,---20=jt~?__
Ordinance Page 4 of 4
M·11-001/0rd.Ch 6.28 SODA 2-22-12
Page 172 of 244
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville, Washington
ORDINANCE l2lqa~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 6.28 TO THE MARYSVILLE MUNICIPAL
CODE ENTITLED "STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA) ORDERS" TO
AMEND 6.28.030 TO ADD PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Council of the City of Marysville, Washington do ordain as follows:
Section 1. MMC Chapter 6.28 entitled "STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA)
ORDERS" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 6.28
STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA) ORDERS
Sections:
6.28.010 Orders -Conditions.
6.28.020 Person subject to court order defined.
6.28.025 Stay out of drug areas orders -Issuance -Other court orders.
6.28.030 Violation of order -Rearrest -Penalties
6.28.040 Prohibited areas -Designation -Modification and termination.
6.28.010 Orders -Conditions.
Any judge or judge pro tempore of the Marysville municipal court may issue written
orders to criminal defendants describing conditions of their pretrial release or the post
conviction conditions of suspension or deferral of their sentences. Orders must be
substantially in the form described in this chapter. (Ord. 2886 § 1,2012).
6.28.020 Person subject to court order defined.
As used in this chapter, "person subject to court order" means any person who is subject
to an order issued under MMC 6.28.010. (Ord. 2886 § 1,2012).
6.28.025 Stay out of drug areas orders -Issuance -Other court orders.
(1) Any order issued pursuant to this chapter that specifically orders as a condition of
pretrial release andlor deferral or suspension of sentence that the defendant stay out of
areas with a high level of illegal drug trafficking shall be hereinafter referred to as a
"SODA" ("Stay Out of Drug Areas") order.
Ordinance Page 1 of 4
M-11-D01/0rd.Amend.Ch 6.28 SODA 3-18-13 draft
Page 173 of 244
(2) SODA orders may be issued to anyone charged with or convicted of possession of
drug paraphernalia, manufacture/delivery of drug paraphernalia, delivery of drug
paraphernalia to a minor, selling/giving drug paraphernalia to another person, possession
of marijuana, or any of the aforementioned crimes that occur within a drug-free zone.
(3) Nothing within this section shall be construed as precluding the court from issuing an
order pursuant to this chapter that is not specifically a SODA order. (Ord. 2886 § 1,
2012).
6.28.030 Violation of order -Rearrest -Penalties.
(1) Written orders issued under this chapter shall contain the court's directives and shall
bear the legend:
WARNING: Violation of this order subjects the violator to arrest rearrest
under Chapter 6.28 MMC and and shall constitute a separate criminal offense
and may result in imposition of suspended or deferred jail time and/or fine.
(2) Whenever a police officer shall have probable cause to believe that a person is subject
to an order issued under this chapter and the person kno'Ns of the order, and that a
violation of the order is occurring in the officer's presence, the officer shall have the
authority to bring the person before the court wherein the order was issued, and for such
purpose may rearrest such person without warrant or other process. (Ord. 2886 § 1,
2m-2f-;
(2) -Penalties
A person who knowingly and willfully disobeys a SODA" ("Stay Out of Drug Areas")
order issued under this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
6.28.040 Prohibited areas -Designation -Modification and termination.
(1) Whenever an order is issued under this chapter, the subject of the order may be
ordered to stay out of certain areas that are set forth within the written order. These areas
will hereinafter be referred to as "prohibited areas."
(2) Prohibited areas that are set forth in SODA orders shall be established by a resolution
of the city council, at a minimum of every two years. The police department shall provide
information to the city council to support establishment and/or the elimination of
prohibited areas in the form of one or more declarations and/or other sworn testimony.
The declaration(s) and/or other sworn testimony shall:
(a) Be by declarant(s) familiar with areas of the city that suffer a high incidence of
drug trafficking activity;
Ordinance Page 2 of 4
M-11-Q01/0rd.Amend.Ch 6.28 SODA 3-18-13 draft
Page 174 of 244
(b) Set forth the education, experience and other relevant qualifications of the
declarant(s);
(c) Set forth the basis for proposing prohibited areas, e.g., crime mapping data or
other information;
(d) Describe the proposed prohibited areas; and
(e) Provide other information that supports the council's review and determination
of prohibited areas.
(3) Prohibited areas that are set forth in orders issued under this chapter other than SODA
orders may be set by court discretion and are not required to be set in accordance with
subsection (2) of this section.
(4) Upon request for modification or termination of any order issued under this chapter,
the court shall consider the requested modification or termination by allowing for a
process by which the subject of the order can provide relevant testimony or other
evidence in support of his/her request.
(5) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order issued under this chapter shall have as
its termination date two years from the date of its issuance.
(6) Whenever an order is issued, modified or terminated pursuant to this chapter, the
clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to
the Marysville police department. Upon receipt of the copy of the order, the Marysville
police department shall enter the order until the expiration date specified on the order into
any computer-based criminal intelligence information system(s) available to Marysville
police officers. Upon receipt of notice that an order has been terminated, the Marysville
police department shall remove the order from the computer-based criminal intelligence
information system(s).
(7) Nothing in any provision of this chapter related to SODA orders shall be construed as
prohibiting the subject of a SODA order from participating in a scheduled court hearing
or from attending a scheduled meeting with his/her legal counsel within a prohibited area.
(Ord. 2886 § 1,2012).
Section 2. General Duty. It is expressly the purpose of this ordinance to provide for and
promote the health safety and welfare of the general public and not to create or otherwise
establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially
protected or benefited by the terms of this ordinance. It is the specific intent of this ordinance
that no provision nor any term used in this ordinance is intended to impose any duty whatsoever
upon the City or any of its officers or employees. Nothing contained in this ordinance is intended
Ordinance Page 3 of4
M-11-001l0rd.Amend.Ch 6.28 SODA 3-18-13 draft
Page 175 of 244
nor shall be construed to create or fonn the basis of any liability on the part of the City, or its
officers, employees or agents for any injury or damage resulting from any action or inaction on
the part of the City related in any manner to the enforcement of this ordinance by its officers,
employees or agents.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of
any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective five days after the date of
its publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor thil]1!:_day o~,2013.
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
ATTEST:
BY~O~'
Apribi3rien, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to fonn: n
By -flt-Dr..Idc..W~
rant Weed, CIty Attorney
Date of Publication: ---""--,~+-'-""""""-
Effective Date (5 days after publication): Slant 3
Ordinance Page 4 of 4
M-11-Q01l0rd.Amend.Ch 6.28 SODA 3·18·13 draft
Page 176 of 244
Page 1
Council Meeting Date: June 2, 2014 Agenda Item: 8(a)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON
AGENDA TITLE: Adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 688 – Stay out of Drug Area
(SODA)
DEPARTMENT: Shoreline Police Department
City Attorney’s Office
PRESENTED BY: Shawn Ledford, Shoreline Police Chief
Scott Strathy, Shoreline Police Captain
Chad Devore, Shoreline Police Sergeant
Julie Ainsworth-Taylor, Assistant City Attorney
ACTION: _X__ Ordinance ____ Resolution ____ Motion
____ Discussion ____ Public Hearing
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Currently, the City does not have regulations in place that authorize the Prosecuting
Attorney’s Office, in consultation with Shoreline Police, to request that the court prohibit
individuals (pre-trial or post-trial) from congregating in designated areas known for drug
use and sales or other types of related criminal activity. Several cities in the region
have adopted Stay-Out-of-Drug Area (SODA) regulations that provide this authority in
their jurisdictions. If adopted, proposed Ordinance No. 688 would provide these
regulations in Shoreline and provide the court with specific delineated areas of the City
known for drug-related activities to utilize for this purpose.
Shoreline Police and City staff have made several presentations to the Council on
proposed SODA regulations. On January 27, 2014, the Shoreline Police’s Special
Emphasis Team (SET) gave a presentation to the Council at a dinner meeting which
included a video of narcotics transactions occurring along Aurora Avenue North. On
April 21, 2014, Police and City staff gave a joint presentation introducing a draft SODA
ordinance. The ordinance reflected, based on Police experiences, a recommendation
for the areas to be delineated for SODA designation and establishment of enforcement
regulations.
RESOURCE/FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is a nominal financial impact related to the use of SODA regulations. Shoreline
Police Officers will have the discretion to physically book an individual subject to a
court-issued SODA Order into jail for a violation of that Order, which would incur a cost
for jail time. In some cases, this cost will be avoided, as the responding Officer can
choose to cite and release that individual instead of book them into jail. Irrespective of
this issue however, SODA regulations will help prevent individuals or groups of
individuals, specifically drug users and dealers, from congregating in the designated
SODA area to engage in narcotics transactions and other illegal activity. This type of
8a-1 Page 177 of 244
Page 2
congregation often leads to other criminal acts supporting a drug habit, such as
burglary, car prowl, shoplifting, and other crimes. By restricting individuals and reducing
associated illegal activity, Police resources (and costs) will be conserved.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council adopt proposed Ordinance No. 688 establishing
designated SODA areas and establishing regulations for the enforcement of these
areas.
Approved By: City Manager DT City Attorney IS
8a-2 Page 178 of 244
Page 3
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Currently, the City does not have regulations in place that authorize the Prosecuting
Attorney’s Office, in consultation with Shoreline Police, to request that the court prohibit
drug users and dealers from congregating in designated areas known for drug use,
sales and other criminal activity. Both police experience with problem areas and
detailed crime analysis support the fact that there are certain areas associated with high
narcotics activity. For Shoreline, these include locations along Aurora Avenue North,
the Interurban Trail, the Aurora Village Transit Center, and Echo Lake Park. If adopted,
proposed Ordinance No. 688, which is attached to this staff report at Attachment A,
would provide these regulations in Shoreline and provide the court with specific
delineated areas of the City known for drug-related activities to utilize for this purpose.
On January 27, 2014, at the Council’s dinner meeting, the Police Special Emphasis
Team (SET) advised the Council on the need for SODA regulations. This Council
discussion included a video of narcotics transactions occurring along Aurora Avenue
North. At the April 21, 2014 Council meeting, Shoreline Police and City staff presented
the draft SODA ordinance along with supporting crime data maps. The staff report and
attachments for this April 21 Council discussion can be viewed at:
http://cosweb.ci.shoreline.wa.us/uploads/attachments/cck/council/staffreports/2014/staff
report042114-8b.pdf.
DISCUSSION
In response to the April 21 staff report and presentation, Council raised the following
questions and concerns regarding the proposed SODA ordinance. The responses to
these questions and concerns are provided in italics below.
Size of the Designated SODA Area and Nexus to Criminal Activity
Council raised a concern about the size of the SODA area. Specifically, Council
questioned if there was a sufficient nexus with criminal activity occurring in the SODA
area versus activity that was occurring elsewhere in the City.
Staff does not believe the size of the SODA, in and of itself, raises a legal issue. The
area proposed for SODA designation encompasses the full length of Aurora Avenue
North, from the City’s southern border at 145th to its northern border at 205th. This area
includes the City’s primary commercial core (extending a block off Aurora in either
direction), the Aurora Village Transit Center, and Echo Lake Park. This generally
mirrors Shoreline’s existing Stay-out-of-Prostitution Area (SOAP), SMC 9.10.560(D)..
All of these areas are known for concentrated criminal activity.
The proposed SODA area, which is attached to this staff report as Attachment B,
encompasses 0.66 square miles, which represents 5.7% of the total area of the City of
Shoreline. Attachment C, Drug Charge and Vice Activity Maps, demonstrates the
linkage between criminal activity in Shoreline and the boundaries of the SODA. While
Police and staff are recommending designation of this entire area, the court retains
ultimate discretion in issuing a SODA order and can customize the SODA order to
ensure the required nexus based on the facts and circumstances of the individual
subject to that order.
8a-3 Page 179 of 244
Page 4
Stakeholder Outreach
Council asked whether the Police and/or City staff have spoken with prosecutors and
defense attorneys about the pros and cons of SODA ordinances.
Staff spoke with City of Shoreline Prosecuting Attorney Sarah Roberts about the
proposed SODA ordinance, and Ms. Roberts explained that she did not have prior direct
involvement with SODA orders, so had little to offer on how SODA orders function best.
However, she did state that she sees similar orders in domestic violence cases and that
these orders are issued both pre-trial and as part of sentencing. Staff also sent
requests to the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and the Washington
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for information of their members’ experience
with SODA. Neither organization responded to this request. Staff also contacted
Professor Katherine Beckett, a criminal/sociology professor at the University of
Washington who has authored publications on the use of exclusionary orders, including
SODA and SOAP orders. Information related to Beckett’s research is included in staff’s
response to statistical data below.
In addition, staff was forwarded a response received by Councilmember Roberts from
the ACLU of Washington. The ACLU opposes such regulations, asserting they are
“ineffective, expensive, and waste precious tax resources that could be invested instead
in intervention strategies that address the underlying behavior more effectively.” The
ACLU provided two examples of alternative programs – Seattle’s Clean Dreams pre-
arrest diversion program and the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion program (LEAD).
Clean Dreams was limited to the Rainier Beach area (renamed C.U.R.B.) and focused
on peer counseling (in conjunction with assisting with jobs, housing, treatment, and
education) and pre-arrest diversion for low-level street crimes, meaning that police can
offer arrestees a choice between going to jail or signing up with Clean Dreams. A 2009
study by UW Assistant Sociology Professor Alexes Harris found that entering clients
average 7.7 prior convictions, but that when they left Clean Dreams, only 18%
reoffended (compared to a statewide recidivism rate of 62%). The LEAD program is a
pilot pre-booking program to address low-level drug and prostitution crimes in Belltown
and Skyway. The program diverts offenders into treatment and support services
instead of processing them through the traditional criminal justice systems. LEAD has
been operating as a pilot program since October 2011, and plans to run until 2015; the
overall effectiveness of the program has not been reviewed. Staff’s research did show
that these diversion programs do have a lower cost than traditional incarceration but the
City would need to either contract for such services or establish a program of its own.
Statistical Data
Council asked several questions in regards to statistical data, including the number of
arrests for drug related activity and the types of arrests, the amount of individuals who
would be banished at any given time, the effectiveness of other jurisdiction’s SODA
ordinances, a statistical comparison to the City’s SOAP ordinance, and jail cost data.
While staff was able to compile some of this statistical data, compiling other data was
not always possible. Some of the requested information, such as court activity for
SODA issuance, was simply not available. Despite this, Police and staff attempted to
provide as much information as possible to assist the Council in its decision-making
process.
8a-4 Page 180 of 244
Page 5
• The number of arrests for drug related activity between 2009-2014, the types of
arrests, and a map detailing this information.
Attachment C provides the requested map. Drug Charges are broken into three
categories – felonies, misdemeanors, and investigations. Totals are as follows:
Drug Charge
Type
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5-year
Total
Annual
Avg.
Felony 79 48 28 39 46 240 48
Investigation 59 47 40 28 32 206 41
Misdemeanor 44 78 36 48 18 224 45
Unclassified 2 0 0 5 0 7 1
Total 184 173 104 120 96 677 135
• If every individual arrested with drug-related crime was subject to a SODA order,
how many individuals would be restricted from entering the SODA at any given
time?
Utilizing the above data, the amounts shown in the total row would represent how many
individuals would be restricted from the SODA area per year if a judge issued a SODA
order for every arrest. In putting this information together, the Data Analyst attempted
to eliminate multiple charges for a single individual in order to accurately answer the
question raised by Council. Council requested that this data be refined to those arrests
that resulted in successful prosecutions but this information is not available.
• Data about the effectiveness of Seattle’s SODA; specifically Seattle’s experience
with its SODA ordinance in relationship to Aurora Avenue.
Data specific to Aurora Avenue was not located. Data that was available is from 2006
to 2009 and is based on annual reports issued by the Seattle City Attorney’s Office.
These reports state that the City of Seattle has limited jurisdiction over drug violations,
as most are felonies falling under King County jurisdiction. However, in 2006 the City
Attorney, in cooperation with the King County Prosecutor, started an incentive-based
program to address possession of trace amounts of controlled substances. Under this
program, arrested individuals are charged with an Attempted Violation of Uniform
Substance Control Act (VUSCA) – a gross misdemeanor – and given two choices –
their case will be dismissed in four months so long as the violator stays out of the SODA
in which he/she was arrested or be charged with felony VUSCA. The 2007 annual
reports states that 79% of defendants that opted for the first choice (SODA compliance)
did not violate the SODA order and 83% did not commit another Attempted VUSCA.
The 2009 Annual Report shows figures from March 2006 to Dec 2009, in which the
percentage of defendants not violating the SODA rose to 83% but the percent of
defendants not committing another Attempted VUSCA fell to 58%. Subsequent reports
don’t address this program and Seattle/King County now appears to be utilizing
L.E.A.D. for low-level offenders. But, what these reports do show is that a vast majority
of those subject to a SODA, at least low-level offenders, do not violate the SODA when
incentives are attached.
8a-5 Page 181 of 244
Page 6
In addition, in the Katherine Beckett 2010 article, Ms. Beckett speaks to Seattle’s SODA
and SOAP orders being imposed on those arrested but not convicted as part of deferred
prosecution. The article notes that from 2001 to 2005, the proportion of sentenced
felony drug offenders with a SODA went from about 7% to about 30% (presumably
because the County decided to start seeking them) but, it could be inferred from this
data that the these orders are sought/granted for about 30% of offenders.
• Data relating to Shoreline’s SOAP ordinance; specifically how many individuals
have been arrested for violating a SOAP order since the ordinance’s adoption
and how many individuals are subject to such an order each year.
The City's SOAP ordinance has been around since the City’s incorporation. As staff
was not able to obtain all of the data going back that far, the following information
represents the number of individuals between 2009 and 2013 who have an underlying
arrest of pimping or prostitution and the number of individuals that have violated a
SOAP order. Unfortunately, staff was not able to obtain the data for the number of
individuals who were issued a SOAP order for these years.
Vice Activity 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5-year
Total
Annual
Avg.
Prostitution/Pimping
Arrests
52 38 68 44 25 227 45
SOAP Order
Violations
0 1 9 2 1 13 3
• Costs of jailing individuals for SODA violations; specifically the costs of jailing
individuals who violated a SOAP order and whether that might increase if the
SODA was adopted.
Using the statistics from 2013 as an example, if all of the individuals arrested for a drug-
related offense that the City is responsible for incarcerating (misdemeanant,
investigation, and unclassified) were issued a SODA order, then 50 individuals would be
impacted. However, using Seattle’s statistics for compliance (83% don’t violate the
order); only nine (9) individuals could have been subsequently arrested in 2013 and
jailed for a SODA violation. Jail time probably would have been no more than a day or
two for each SODA violation arrest. Using the City's current King County Jail bed rate
of $141.88 per bed day and an average of two jail days per defendant, enforcement of
SODA violations resulting in jail time would potentially cost around $2,500 per year.
Pre-Trial versus Post-Trial Issuance of SODA orders
Council questioned both the use and the penalty for violation of a SODA order – a gross
misdemeanor - for pre-trial SODA orders given that the individual had not been
convicted of the underlying crime.
As proposed, the SODA regulations may be utilized by the court to impose restrictions
pre-trial or as part of a convicted individual’s sentence. A “knowing violation” of a SODA
order is a gross misdemeanor. Various cities allow for the use of SODA orders for pre-
8a-6 Page 182 of 244
Page 7
trial and post-trial purposes (e.g. Everett, Tacoma, and Marysville). RCW 10.66.020(4)
and .020(5) allow for a Potential Area of Drug Trafficking (PADT) exclusion order in
either the pre-trial or post-trial setting; RCW 10.66.090 makes a knowing violation a
gross misdemeanor. Washington court rules, CrR 3.2 and CrRLJ 3.2 both permit a
judge to impose restrictions on travel or prohibitions on entering certain geographical
areas as a condition of pre-trial release. Thus, since it is within the powers of the court
even without SODA regulations, staff does not see a concern with including pre-trial
SODA orders within the regulations. In addition, Shoreline Police experience
demonstrates the usefulness of pre-trial SODA orders in deterring arrestees from
immediately returning to the area; which is a common occurrence. Therefore, Shoreline
Police and staff continue to recommend the ability to request the court to issue a SODA
order either pre-trial or as part of sentencing.
As to the penalty, staff recognizes that a SODA order is, in essence, a court order and,
therefore, subject to a finding of contempt when it is violated. Contempt of court
violations result in remedial and/or punitive penalties as provided in RCW 7.21; this
statute does not expressly provide for criminal charges and also does not restrict the
remedial or punitive methods the court can utilize. Looking at other jurisdictions, the
penalty for violations of SODA orders runs from re-arrest (Everett) to misdemeanor
(Tacoma) to gross misdemeanor (Marysville). The City’s gross misdemeanor penalty is
patterned after RCW 10.66.090. It is within the discretion of the Council to select the
appropriate penalty for a knowing violation of a SODA order. However, Police and staff
are recommending the charge of gross misdemeanor for both pre- and post-trial orders
to provide a strong deterrent to violating the order.
First Amendment/Constitutional Rights
Council raised concerns about the constitutionality of the SODA order in regards to
restriction on travel and First Amendment free speech.
As noted in the original staff report for the April 21 Council meeting, court cases have
upheld the use of these types of exclusionary orders with specific reference to
restriction on travel. See, e.g. State v. McBride, 74 Wn. App. 460 (1994) (upholding
RCW 10.66 PADT, stating that persons convicted of felonies may be deprived of some
of their constitutionally guaranteed liberties and, therefore, reasonable restrictions on
travel during community supervision do not violate a person's constitutional right to
travel); State v. Schimelpfenig, 128 Wn. App. 224 (2005) (recognizing the ability to
infringe upon a right to travel and analyzing banishment orders for constitutional
limitations but noting that well-defined boundaries [such as the SODA boundaries]
fosters the uniform enforcement of such a restriction).
As to free speech, Council’s concern was that by restricting the right to enter the SODA,
that the City would be infringing upon other rights, such as free speech. Specifically if
that person wished to participate in some activity within the restricted area, such as a
political demonstration. The only case providing any insight on this question was the
McBride court case which, within its analysis of “overbreadth,” concluded that RCW
10.66 did not reach constitutionally protected speech. Thus, given the cases involving
PADT orders and SODA orders that were cited in the April 21 staff report, staff believes
that it is unlikely such exclusionary orders would rise to a level of violating
8a-7 Page 183 of 244
Page 8
constitutionally protected rights so long as the issuing court ensures that there is a
relationship between the crime and the restricting condition.
ALTERNATIVES
Based on the Council’s previous discussion and concerns, Shoreline Police and City
staff see the following alternatives for the Council’s consideration:
SODA Delineation
The SODA boundaries are based on criminal activity documented over the past five
years. Police and City staff believe that these boundaries, which run the full length of
Aurora Avenue North and incorporate the Aurora Transit Center and Echo Lake Park,
adequately delineate areas of concern and Council should accept them. However, if
Council believes the designated SODA should be modified, then staff recommends that
Council provide necessary direction for establishing the boundary and return for future
adoption.
SODA Violation
Police and City staff believe by setting the penalty at a gross misdemeanor for both pre-
trial and post-trial violations, a SODA violation provides not only a strong deterrent, but
uniformity in administration of the regulation. If Council believes the penalty should be
modified, staff recommends that Council provide necessary direction and/or propose
amendatory language that would allow the ordinance to be adopted.
RESOURCE/FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is a nominal financial impact related to the use of SODA regulations. Shoreline
Police Officers will have the discretion to physically book an individual subject to a
court-issued SODA Order into jail for a violation of that Order, which would incur a cost
for jail time. In some cases, this cost will be avoided, as the arresting Officer can
choose to cite and release that individual instead of book them into jail. Irrespective of
this issue however, SODA regulations will help prevent individuals or groups of
individuals, specifically drug users and dealers, from congregating in the designated
SODA area to engage in narcotics transactions and other illegal activity. This type of
congregation often leads to other criminal acts supporting a drug habit, such as
burglary, car prowl, shoplifting, and other crimes. By restricting individuals and reducing
associated illegal activity, Police resources (and costs) will be conserved.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council adopt proposed Ordinance No. 688 establishing
designated SODA areas and establishing regulations for the enforcement of these
areas.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Proposed Ordinance No. 688, including Exhibit A
Attachment B: Proposed SODA Map
Attachment C: Drug Charge and Vice Activity Maps
8a-8 Page 184 of 244
1
ORDINANCE NO. 688
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHORELINE,
WASHINGTON, ADDING A SECTION TO CHAPTER 9.10
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE SHORELINE MUNICIPAL CODE
DESIGNATING “STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS” (SODA) AND
ESTBLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE ISSUANACE AND
ENFORCEMENT OF COURT-ISSUED SODA ORDERS.
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Municipal Code, Chapter 9.10, provides for the
prosecution of various criminal offenses within the City of Shoreline; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that local businesses, property owners, and
the Shoreline Police Department have reported an increase of criminal activity in
certain areas of the City which seriously impacts the quality of life and the standard of
commercial activity within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the increase in criminal activity is
directly linked to the illegal sale, possession, and use of drugs controlled by
Washington’s Uniform Substance Control Act, 69.50 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that because this Ordinance will
assist the criminal justice system in dealing with drug-related criminal activity, it
would be in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the
City of Shoreline to place geographic restrictions on certain violators with respect to
illegal drug-related activity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to designate limited geographic areas of
the City as “Stay Out of Drug Areas” (SODAs), recognizing that, in addition to the
predetermined SODA areas, superior and district court judges may, on a case-by-case
basis, issue orders with prohibited areas for defendants that are different than the
legislatively-determined SODAs; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with these designations, the City Council deems it
appropriate to adopt regulations for the enforcement of SODAs and penalties for
violations of court-issued SODA orders;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHORELINE, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment to Chapter 9.10 Criminal Code.
Attachment A
8a-9 Page 185 of 244
2
Section 9.10.220, Definitions, is amended and a new section, Section 9.10.285, Stay
Out of Drug Areas (SODA), is added to Title 9, Chapter 9.10, Criminal Code, as set
forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Section 2. Severability.
If any portion of this chapter is found to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason,
such finding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other chapter or any
other section of this chapter.
Section 3. Effective Date and Publication.
A summary of this ordinance consisting of its title shall be published in the official
newspaper of the City. The ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on July 1,
2014.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 2, 2014.
Mayor Shari Winstead
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jessica Simulcik Smith Ian Sievers
City Clerk City Attorney
Publication Date:
Effective Date: July 1, 2014
Attachment A
8a-10 Page 186 of 244
1
Shoreline Municipal Code
Title 9 – Public Peace, Morals, and Welfare; Section 9.10 Criminal Code
Amendments to SMC 9.10.220; New Section, SMC 9.10.285
Stay Out of Drug Areas (SODA)
Amendment to SMC 9.10.220 – Controlled substances – Definitions
D. “Stay Out of Drug Area” (SODA) means any specifically described area, public or
private, identified and designated by the City as an anti-drug activity emphasis area
based on repeat incidents of narcotics-related activity occurring therein.
E. “SODA Order” means an order issued by a superior, or district court which prohibits
or restricts a person from entering or remaining in a designated SODA.
New Section, SMC 9.10.285 - STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS
A. Purpose.
A court may issue an order prohibiting a person from entering or remaining in a
designated “Stay Out of Drug Area” (SODA). This prohibition is one means of
addressing illegal drug activity; activity that the City finds is threatening the health,
safety, and welfare of the citizens of Shoreline. By designating specific areas, public
or private, within the City of Shoreline as a SODA, the City, in conjunction with the
court, is working towards eliminating illegal drug possession, use, sales and other
criminal activity associated with these activities.
B. Designation of Stay Out of Drug Areas.
1. Certain areas of the City are designated and identified as SODAs based on
repeat, high-level incidents of narcotics-related activities occurring within the
area. The perimeters of a SODA may be defined using street names or numbers
and shall include all real property contained therein, where drug sales,
possession of drugs, pedestrian or vehicular traffic attendant to drug activity, or
other activity associated with drug offenses confirms a pattern associated with
illegal drug trafficking and use. The area shall include the full width of streets,
alleys, and sidewalks on the perimeter, common areas, planting strips, parks and
parking areas within the area described using the streets as boundaries.
2. The following described areas are identified and designated as a SODA:
a. Aurora Avenue North from North 145th Street to North 205th Street,
including one block east and west of Aurora Avenue;
b. Aurora Transit Center, located at 1524 North 200th Street;
c. Echo Lake City Park located at 1521 North 200th Street;
d. Interurban Trail corridor, located between North 145th Street and North
205th Street.
Attachment A
Exhibit A
8a-11 Page 187 of 244
2
The boundaries of the designated SODA identified by this section shall be shown
and delineated on the “Stay Out of Drug Area (SODA)” map accompanying the
ordinance codified in this section and hereby incorporated by reference. The
SODA map shall be maintained as such and will be on file at City Hall.
3. Designated SODAs shall be reviewed every two (2) years by the City Attorney
and the Chief of Police to ensure their continued effectiveness.
Recommendations for de-designation or modification of an existing SODA or for
the designation of a new SODA shall be subject to approval by the City Council.
C. Issuance of SODA Order.
1. The City Attorney, after consultation with the Chief of Police, may seek a SODA
Order from the court as a condition of pre-trial release or a condition of sentence,
deferral, or suspension for any person.
2. A court may enter a SODA Order prohibiting a person from entering or remaining
in a designated SODA for up to one year. The SODA Order shall be in writing
and shall bear the following language:
“Violation of this court order is a criminal offense under SMC 9.10.285 and shall
constitute a separate criminal offense. Violators will be subject to arrest.”
3. The court in its discretion may allow a person subject to a SODA order to enter a
SODA under certain conditional exceptions. Exceptions to the SODA order may
include travel to and from and/or remaining in the following locations so long as
these locations apply to or are used by the person who is subject of the SODA
order:
a. Place of residence;
b. Court/government offices (while open to the public);
c. Social services provider or treatment center;
d. Place of employment;
e. School;
f. Attorney’s office; or
g. Medical services.
If the court allows for exceptions in the SODA order, the person subject to that
order is required to have a copy of the order on his/her person whenever he/she
is traveling through a restricted designated SODA(s). Failure to present this
order upon request by law enforcement is a violation of the SODA order and
subject to the penalties set forth in this chapter. For the purpose of this section,
travel is defined as movement on foot or in a vehicle from one point to another
without delay.
4. Upon entering a SODA order, the clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the
order to the City of Shoreline Police Department on or before the next judicial day
following issuance of the order. Upon receipt, the Shoreline Police shall enter
8a-12 Page 188 of 244
3
the order into the appropriate law enforcement information system, noting the
expiration date of the SODA order.
D. Notice of SODA Order.
A person is deemed to have notice of the SODA order when:
1. The signature of the person prohibited in the order is affixed to the bottom of the
order, acknowledging receipt of the order; or
2. The order otherwise indicates that either the person or the person’s attorney
received a copy of the order.
E. Enforcement Procedure.
1. If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a person subject
to a SODA order is knowingly violating that order, such person may be
apprehended and arrested without the necessity for any warrant or additional
court order.
2. The Chief of Police, in consultation with the City Attorney, shall have the authority
to promulgate procedures for the administration of this chapter.
F. Penalties.
1. Any person who knowingly disobeys a SODA order shall be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
2. Any person who knowingly disobeys a SODA order may also be found in
contempt of court.
8a-13 Page 189 of 244
ASHWORTH Avenue NorthFREMONT Avenue NorthNorth 200TH Street 5TH Avenue NortheastGREENWOOD Avenue North10TH Avenue NortheastNorth 195TH Street LINDEN Avenue North1ST Avenue NortheastMIDVALEAvenueNorthNorth 165TH Street
Northeast 165TH Street
North 192ND Street
North 175TH Street
Northwest 195TH Street3RD Avenue NorthwestNorth 145TH Street
North 172ND Street
North 175TH Street
§¨¦5
MERIDIAN Avenue North5TH Avenue NortheastNorth 185TH Street
North 155TH Street DAYTONAvenueNorthNortheast 155TH Street
Northeast 185TH Street
North 160TH Street
NorthRICHMONDBEACHRoadDAY
TONAvenueNorthAURORA Avenue NorthNorth 175TH Street Northeast 175TH Street WESTMINSTER Way NorthProposed
Stay Out of Drug Area
(SODA)
SODA Boundary
Aurora Ave
InterurbanTrail
Document Path: C:\Users\JJOHNSON\SODA.mxd
¯
Aurora Village
Transit Center
Echo Lake
Park
North 205th Street
North 145th Street
00.250.125
MilesAurora Ave NorthAurora Ave NorthSODA Boundary encompasses
.66 square miles, which
represents 5.7% of the total
area of the City of Shoreline.
Attachment B
8a-14 Page 190 of 244
8a-15Page 191 of 244
8a-16Page 192 of 244
Tacoma Municipal Code
Chapter 8.160
STAY OUT OF DRUG AREAS (SODA) ORDERS – VIOLATION
Sections:
8.160.005 Enforcement priority.
A. Certain areas of the City shall be designated as and identified to be anti-drug activity emphasis
areas based on the repeat incidents of narcotics-related activities occurring therein, and additional penalties may be
applied in the event of conviction of City or state laws within said areas. The areas to be so designated shall be
identified by the City Council in a resolution passed after consultation with the City Manager, City Attorney, and
the chief law enforcement officer of the City, and the list identifying such areas shall be kept on file in the office of
the City Clerk. Additional areas may also be identified by the Municipal Court hearing drug-related cases arising
from within the City limits.
B. Stay Out of Drug Areas orders, hereafter known as “SODA orders,” may be issued by the Tacoma
Municipal Court as a condition or term of sentence, deferral, or suspension to any person convicted of prohibited
narcotics-related offenses contrary to any provision of the Tacoma Municipal Code (“TMC”). Further, the court
may issue a SODA order as a condition of release pending disposition of a narcotics-related offense.
C. A person is deemed to have notice of the SODA order when:
1. The signature of the person prohibited in the order is affixed to the bottom of the order,
acknowledging receipt of the order; or
2. The order otherwise indicates that either the person or the person’s attorney appeared before the
court.
D. The SODA order shall be in writing and shall bear the following language: “Violation of this
court order is a criminal offense under TMC 8.160 and will subject the violator to arrest.”
E. If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a person subject to the conditions
of a SODA order is violating or failing to comply with any requirement or restriction imposed by the court, such
person may be apprehended and arrested without the necessity for any warrant or additional court order.
F. A violation of a SODA order shall constitute a misdemeanor. Upon conviction, any person so
violating the terms and conditions of the SODA order shall be punished by imprisonment in jail for a maximum
term fixed by the court of not more than 90 days, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than
$1,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine. (Ord. 27513 § 1; passed Aug. 1, 2006)
8.160.005 Enforcement priority.
The police chief and city attorney shall make the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of cannabis
(a/k/a "marijuana") offenses the lowest enforcement priority, as this term may be defined in their policies and
procedures manuals, for adult personal use.
(City of Tacoma Initiative 1; General Election Nov. 8, 2011)
Page 193 of 244
Ordinance No. _2=-..:..7-=5~1:.....:3=----_____ _
First Reading of Ordinances] u lVI :;( () [9-OUCP
Final Reading of OrdinancJ.\UG -1 2006
Passed: AIIG - ] 20D6
Roll Call Vote:
MEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
Ms. Anderson -
Mr. Evans /"
Mr. Fey /'
Ms. Ladenburg f
Mr. Lonergan ./
Mr. Manthou /
Mr. Stenger /
Mr. Talbert ./
Mayor Baarsma /
MEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
Ms. Anderson
Mr. Evans
Mr. Fey
Ms. Ladenburg
Mr. Lonergan
Mr. Manthou
Mr. Stenger
Mr. Talbert
Mayor Baarsma
g:lcifyclklcifyclklformslord-roll.doc
Page 198 of 244
ORDINANCE NO. 611
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
UNIVERSITY PLACE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 7, CRIMINAL CODE, TO CREATE A
NEW CHAPTER 7.04 RELATING TO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING
GEOGRAPHIC RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN VIOLATORS – CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCES, AND ARREST OF PERSONS SUBJECT TO COURT ORDER.
WHEREAS, Section 39.34.180 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) has, since 1996, made
Washington municipalities responsible for the prosecution of misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor
offenses committed by adults in their respective jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2010, the City of University Place adopted a new criminal code that,
for the most part, incorporates RCW criminal code sections by reference rather than restating them as local
code sections as authorized by RCW 35.21.180; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Place has determined that it would be in the
best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of University Place to place geographic
restrictions on certain violators with respect to illegal drug related activity, and to specify the authority of the
University Place Municipal Court to enforce its orders imposing restrictions on an individual basis; and
WHEREAS, in order to place such restrictions on drug-related violators and to authorize the
Municipal Court to enforce such ordered restrictions, the City must amend UPMC Title 7, Criminal Code, to
add Chapter 7.04 relating to enforcement actions involving geographic restrictions on certain violators –
controlled substances, and arrest of persons subject to Court order.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amended. Title 7 of University Place Municipal Code entitled “Criminal Code,” is
hereby amended with the following new sections:
7.04.000 - Controlled Substances
Chapter 7.04
Controlled Substances
Sections:
7.04.010 Loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related activity.
7.04.020 Designation of anti-drug emphasis areas.
7.04.030 Violation of conditions of release, suspension or deferral as separate crime.
7.04.040 Places of illegal drug activity declared public nuisances.
7.04.050 Evidence of use for illegal drug purposes.
7.04.060 Conviction as prima facie evidence.
7.04.070 Penalties for maintenance of public nuisance.
7.04.080 Violation - Penalty.
7.04.010 - Loitering With the Intent of Engaging in Drug-Related Activity
A. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any thoroughfare, place open to the public, or near
any public or private place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the intent to engage
in drug-related activity contrary to any of the provisions of Chapters 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW.
B. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such intent is
manifested are the following:
Page 199 of 244
1. Such person is a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller. For purposes of this chapter,
a “known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller” is a person who has been convicted in any
court within this state of any violation involving the use, possession, or sale of any of the
substances referred to in Chapters 69.41, 69.50, and 69.52 RCW, or substantially similar laws
of any political subdivision of this state or of any other state; or who is known to have been
arrested for a drug related violation not resulting in a conviction because the person
participated in a diversionary program, deferral program, Drug Court or a similar program; or
a person who displays physical characteristics of drug intoxication or usage, such as “needle
tracks”; or who possesses marijuana as defined in Section 9.22.010 of this Chapter; or a
person who possesses drug paraphernalia as defined in Section 9.22.020 of this Chapter;
2. Such person is currently subject to an order from any court prohibiting his/her presence in a
high drug activity geographic area;
3. Such person behaves in such a manner as to raise a reasonable suspicion that he or she is
about to engage in or is then engaged in an unlawful drug-related activity, including by way
of example only, such person acting as a “lookout”;
4. Such person transfers small objects or packages for currency in a furtive fashion;
5. Such person takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer;
6. Such person manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or herself or any object which
reasonably could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity;
7. The area involved is by public repute known to be an area of unlawful drug use and trafficking;
8. The premises involved are known to have been reported to law enforcement as a place
suspected of drug activity pursuant to Chapter 69.52 RCW;
9. Any vehicle involved is registered to a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller, or a
person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity.
7.04.020 - Designation of Anti-Drug Emphasis Areas
A. Certain areas of the City shall be designated as and identified to be anti-drug emphasis areas
based on the repeat incidents of illegal drug activities occurring therein, and enhanced penalties
shall be applied in event of conviction of unlawful drug related acts or loitering for drug purposes,
within the said areas. The areas to be so designated shall be identified by the City Council in an
Ordinance or Resolution passed after consultation with the City Manager, City Attorney and the
chief law enforcement officer of the City, and the list identifying such areas shall be kept on file in
the office of the City Clerk. Additional areas may also be identified by the Judge of the Municipal or
District Court hearing drug related cases arising from within the City. If a defendant is convicted of
a drug related case occurring from within an area designated as an anti-drug emphasis area, a
condition or term of sentence, deferral, or suspension, shall be that such defendant shall stay out
of all areas of the City designated as an anti-drug emphasis area, unless there are significant and
substantial extenuating circumstances in the defendant's particular case justifying avoidance of the
requirement for such condition or term of sentence, deferral, or suspension. In such case, the
significant and substantial extenuating circumstances shall be identified and recited in the record
of the case.
B. The following area is hereby designated as and identified to be an anti-drug emphasis area:
Area A. ORCHARD CORRIDOR
Starting at the northeast corner of 48th St. W. and Orchard St. W. west 1537 feet to Leach
Creek, then southwest 5690 straight-line feet following the centerline of Leach Creek to a
point where Leach Creek would cross 64th St. W., then east along southern edge of 64th St.
W. to a point 857 feet east of Lakewood Dr. W., then north 933 feet along the eastern edge
of Pierce County tax parcels 0220238036, 0220238035, 0220238034, 0220238033,
0220234128, 0220234131, 0220234139, and 0220234140, then west 234 feet along the
northern edge of Pierce County tax parcel 0220234140, then north 337 feet along the eastern
edge of Pierce County tax parcel 0220234013, then west 530 feet along the northern edge
of Pierce County tax parcel 0220234013 to the east edge of Orchard St. W., then north along
the eastern edge of Orchard St. W. to the northeast corner of 48th St. W. and Orchard St. W.
Page 200 of 244
7.04.030 - Violation of Conditions of Release, Suspension or Deferral as Separate Crime
A. The presence of any person within an anti-drug emphasis area in violation of court-imposed
conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral of any sentence shall constitute a
separate crime hereby designated a gross misdemeanor and any such person may be
apprehended and arrested without the necessity for any warrant or additional court order. Upon
conviction, any person so violating the conditions of release or conditions of suspension or deferral
shall be punished by imprisonment in jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than
one (1) year, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than five thousand dollars
($5,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and fine.
7.04.040 - Places of Illegal Drug Activity Declared Public Nuisances
Any building, structure or place within the City used for drug-related activity or for loitering with the intent of
engaging in drug-related activity as defined in this Chapter is hereby declared to be a public nuisance.
7.04.050 - Evidence of Use for Illegal Drug Purposes
A. Two or more criminal convictions of persons for drug-related offenses in a building, structure or
place, within the one-year period preceding the commencement of an action under this Chapter
shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that the building, structure or place has been used for
illegal drug purposes and is a public nuisance. In any action under this Chapter, evidence of the
common fame and general reputation of the building or place, of the inmates or occupants thereof,
or of those resorting thereto, shall be admissible as evidence to prove the existence of the public
nuisance but must be supported by additional evidence. Evidence of the general reputation of the
building or place, or of the inmates or occupants thereof that is sufficient to establish the existence
of the public nuisance, shall be prima facie evidence of knowledge thereof and acquiescence and
participation therein and responsibility for the nuisance by persons or legal entities having an
interest in the property. Responsibility for the nuisance shall extend to the owners, lessors, lessees
and all those in interest in any form in the property, real or personal, used in conducting or
maintaining the public nuisance.
B. Evidence of cooperation by owners, agents or managers of a building or place with police
investigations or operations to control drug related activity may be used to rebut the presumptions
created in this Chapter.
7.04.060 - Conviction as Prima Facie Evidence
Any conviction of any owner, manager, operator, agent or employee for any illegal drug activity, or for
loitering with the intent of engaging in drug-related activity, when such offense was related to any business
or commercial enterprise, shall be prima facie evidence that the building, structure or place upon or in which
business or commercial enterprise is or was conducted, was used for illegal drug activities.
7.04.070 - Penalties for Maintenance of Public Nuisance
Maintenance of a public nuisance as declared herein, in addition to any other civil or criminal penalties,
shall result in a civil penalty not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) nor more than one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) for a first conviction of maintaining a public nuisance and by abatement by closure of such
business or commercial enterprise for the period of thirty (30) days for each subsequent conviction of
maintaining a public nuisance.
7.04.080 - Violation - Penalty
Unless specifically provided otherwise, any person who violates the provisions of this Chapter is guilty of a
gross misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned in jail for a period of up to one year or fined
an amount of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or both such jail time and fine.
Page 201 of 244
Section 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections or sentences of this ordinance
are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion
of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3. Effective date. A summary of this Ordinance consisting of its title shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 1, 2012.
_______________________________________
Ken Grassi, Mayor
ATTEST:
Emelita Genetia, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Steve Victor, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 10/03/12
Effective Date: 10/08/12
Page 202 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Community Development Block Grant Action Plan Update (15
Minutes) (Hinman)
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
Executive S ummary
CDBG Action Plan
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 203 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
1. Introduction
Each year the City of Auburn executes specific actions to implement the goals and strategies of
the Consolidated Plan for Years 2015-2019. Actions that will be undertaken in 2018 are outlined
in this Annual Action Plan.
The City of Auburn anticipates the receipt of approximately $428,078 in Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in 2018. In addition to CDBG funds, the City allocates 1%
of the City's General Funds to Human Services. Human Services oversees and is responsible for
providing and managing financial resources to more than 30 non-profit agencies that serve the
Auburn community, administering the local housing repair program, and developing
collaborations among community partners to strengthen the response to residents in need.
The 2018 Action Plan proposes to allocate $42,500 of CDBG funds to public services. Most of
those funds ($32,500) will be used to provide dental and medical care to uninsured or under
insured low income Auburn residents. The remaining $10,000 will be used for employment
training.
Approximately $85,000 of the CDBG funds will be allocated to program administration, which
includes planning and citizen participation. The remaining $300,000 will be allocated
to residential rehabilitation.
The City of Auburn is committed to continuing to focus on achieving solutions to recurring social
problems and achieving a greater collaboration among service providers. Overall the
implementation of the Consolidated Plan is progressing as planned and all of the activities
included are underway.
2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan
This Action Plan allocates a total of $428,078 dollars in anticipated 2017 Community
Development Block Grant funds, to support the Community Development Block Grant program.
With the overall goal of reducing the number of people living in poverty within the City of Auburn,
the following objectives and outcomes will be employed:
Page 204 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
1. Support decent, affordable housing for low income residents
2. Support job training activities as part of an anti-poverty strategy
3. Support low- and moderate-income neighborhoods
4. Support accessibility to affordable health care
5. Administer the Community Development Block Grant program to meet the community
needs and HUD requirements
To accomplish these outcomes and objectives, the City invests in programs that meet the
community basic needs, increase self-sufficiency, provide economic opportunity and develop a
safe community.
3. Evaluation of past performance
During the past year Auburn has accomplished significant achievement on its programs and
impacted the lives of thousands of residents. In 2016 alone, projects funded by the City
completed the following:
• Over 50 senior and/or disabled homeowners received housing repair services.
• 12 Auburn small businesses received technical assistance to expand or start up in Auburn
benefitting Low to Moderate income areas.
• Over 300 low to moderate income residents received free or low cost medical and/or
dental care
• 20 low to moderate income Auburn residents received employment training and
supportive services
4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process
The city has engaged in a public participation process for the 2017 Annual Action Plan, as outlined
below:
• Drafts of the Action Plan have been made available for public at City Hall and notices of
its public view will be publicized in the local newspaper as of November 14, 2017
• Request for public comment will be emailed to service agencies on November 13, 2017
seeking input through December 15, 2017
• A public hearing will be provided on December 18, 2017, during the City Council meeting
to receive input on the 2018 Annual Action Plan
The City of Auburn in conjunction with the Consortium consulted with multiple public and private
agencies during the development of the consolidated plan. Agencies that participated in
Page 205 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
consultations included: the King County Housing Authority, King County All Home, other
government human service providers and nonprofit agencies delivering services in Auburn and
the sub-region.
In addition to conducting consultations during the development of the plan, the City of Auburn
collaborates and works closely with numerous coalitions, committees and government entities.
5. Summary of public comments
To be included following the public comment period.
6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
To be included following the public comment period.
7. Summary
Auburn residents along with stakeholders, community partners, service providers and others
were consulted during the development of the Action Plan. They provided valuable input that
supported to the development of the outcomes and objectives listed in the plan.
Summary of public comment to be included following the public comment period.
Page 206 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Agency Role Name Department/Agency Lead Agency AUBURN CDBG Administrator ESG Administrator Table 1 – Responsible Agencies Annual Action Plan Contact Information Joy Scott Human Services Manager 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 253-876-1965 jfscott@auburnwa.gov Page 207 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)
1. Introduction
The City of Auburn recognizes the importance of citizen participation in the development and
implementation of the annual Action Plan. During the process of development, city staff
consulted with multiple public and private agencies. Agencies that participated in
consultations included: the King County Department of Community and Human Services, King
County Human Services Planners, nonprofit agencies delivering services in Auburn and the sub-
region as well as City of Auburn internal partnerships.
In addition to conducting consultations during the development of the plan, the City of Auburn
collaborates and works closely with numerous coalitions, committees and government entities
on an ongoing basis in efforts to enhance strategies and systems to meet established goals and
objectives designated in the plan.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between
public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and
service agencies (91.215(l)).
The City of Auburn works closely with partnering King County jurisdictions, public housing
authorities and health providers to develop systems in order to improve the quality of service
and access for low-income residents as well as the community as a whole within the city and
throughout the region.
Additionally, the City participates in monthly meetings with staff from King County Department
of Community and Human Services, Public Health King County, the Housing Development
Consortium, Valley Cities, the Multi-Service Center, and the King County Housing Authority to
review program progress and delivery of services funded through regional efforts. This regional
collaboration work is supported by the South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership, which
Auburn and other South King County Cities contribute to in order to fund a full time position to
address issues related to housing and homelessness in the South King County region.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of
homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with
children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
King County’s regional Continuum of Care (CoC) aims to make homelessness in our region rare,
brief, and one-time. In Coordination with the CoC, Auburn supported funding programs such as
Page 208 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
the Valley Cities Landing, Nexus Youth and Families Severson House and the YWCA Auburn
Transitional Housing Program. All programs provide housing and supportive services to homeless
persons (including homeless Veterans, families, chronically homeless individuals and
unaccompanied youth).
The City also participates in the annual Point in Time count of unsheltered individuals in King
County, organized by our CoC.
Coordinating services and funding is critical to our region’s implementation of the King County
All Home strategic plan on homelessness which aims to help individuals and families experiencing
homelessness meet three goals:
• achieve residential stability
• increase their skill levels and/or incomes
• strengthen their ability to influence decisions that affect their lives
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in
determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate
outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and
procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS
All projects receiving CoC funding are required by HUD to apply for support through a local
Continuum of Care. For King County, the Continuum of Care encompasses programs and activities
within the borders of King County. Each continuum sets funding priorities and need for its
community. The King County CoC priorities are set by All Home King County. Auburn staff
contribute to the CoC by working collaboratively with All Home on efforts for King County to
ensure coordination efforts between the two entities.
2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and
consultations
Page 209 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization KING COUNTY Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - County What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City of Auburn consulted with all types of organizations that primarily serve the populations focused on in the Action Plan and implemented programs that addressed the greatest need in the community. The only types of organizations not consulted with were corrections facilities and homeless shelters. The rationale for not consulting with these facilities is that the City does not host either type of organization in the region. Page 210 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care King County The goals of Auburn's Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of the CoC to address the needs of homeless residents in the community and reduce the risk of homelessness. Table 3 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Page 211 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting Citizen participation plays a crucial role in the success of the City's Annual Action Plan. The goals are to hear the community's feedback and recommendations on how CDBG funds should be invested and how services can coordinate to achieve the greatest impact. In addition to the targeted outreach listed below, the City regularly engages service providers and stakeholders in discussions regarding human services and local economic development needs. Organizations funded by the city are monitored throughout the year and report quarterly on progress, trends, and challenges. City staff co-host a monthly meeting of service providers working with individuals and families experiencing homelessness in the region to gather feedback and support increased capacity building through broad collaboration of regional providers. In addition, City staff meet regularly with other cities in the area and other funders to evaluate gaps in services and seek solutions to local and regional community development challenges. Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 1 Newspaper Ad Non-targeted/broad community To be included following the public comment period. 2 Email Service providers in Auburn To be included following the public comment period Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach Page 212 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The City of Auburn anticipates funding for the duration of the Consolidated Plan from • CDBG • City of Auburn General Fund allocation for Human Services Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 428,078 0 0 428,078 856,156 Page 213 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ General Fund public - local Public Services 500,000 0 0 500,000 1,000,000 1% of City’s General Fund is allocated to Human Services. These funds support agencies that deliver services to Auburn residents addressing child abuse and neglect, domestic violence and sexual assault, health care, and poverty reduction. Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City of Auburn relies on CDBG funds to support community and economic development projects and activities in efforts to support low to moderate income populations to become self-sufficient and sustain affordable housing. However, CDBG funds are not the only source of funds the City uses to support community projects and activities. The City's general funds are used to support direct services benefitting Auburn's at risk populations in addition to CDBG funds. CDBG funds do not require matching funds. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs Page 214 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) identified in the plan N/A Discussion The City of Auburn will use CDBG funds to support eligible projects and activities that align with CDBG guidelines and regulations. Page 215 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 End Homelessness 2015 2019 Homeless Homeless Prevention and Intervention CDBG: $42,500 Homelessness Prevention: 150 Persons Assisted Jobs created/retained: 15 Jobs 2 Ensure Decent, Affordable Housing 2015 2019 Affordable Housing Public Housing Affordable Housing Development and Preservation Neighborhood Revitalization CDBG: $300,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 50 Household Housing Unit 3 Planning and Administration 2015 2019 Planning and Administration CDBG: $85,578 Table 6 – Goals Summary Page 216 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d)
Introduction
Auburn's Annual Action Plan provides descriptions of proposals of how funds will be prioritized
to achieve goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. Projects funded by the City will address the
priority needs of providing assistance to prevent homelessness, ensure affordable housing and a
suitable living environment. Projects and programs are selected through a competitive
application process to ensure optimal quality services is provided to the community in use of the
funds.
# Project Name
1 Housing Repair
2 Administration
3 HealthPoint
4 Employment Training Program
Table 7 – Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved
needs
The allocations proposed are based on the assessment of Auburn's needs, the resources available
in the region, the availability of other funds also focusing on needs, and the purpose of
Consolidated Plan funds.
Should CDBG revenues exceed the proposed amount, the additional resources shall be allocated
in accordance to the following guidelines:
• Fill gaps in human services primarily healthcare, homeless prevention and intervention
and affordable housing accessibility.
• Increase funding for community development projects and activities including housing,
community facilities and economic development.
If increases are not significant enough to enhance projects or activities funds may be placed in
contingency for programming later in the year or the following program year.
Should CDBG revenues come in lower than anticipated; the City will continue with its planned
policy and to the extent allowed reduce funding allocations in physical development projects and
administrative activities.
Should CDBG revenues come in less than originally proposed, the City will continue managing the
Page 217 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
programs with decreased resources to the extent possible and reduce funding allocations
in administrative activities and not public services.
If exceeded revenues are not significant enough to enhance or fund a project, funds may be
placed in contingency for programming later in the year or in the next program year.
Page 218 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information Page 219 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
1 Project Name HOUSING REPAIR
Target Area
Goals Supported Ensure a Suitable Living Environment
End Homelessness
Ensure Decent, Affordable Housing
Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development and Preservation
Neighborhood Revitalization
Funding CDBG: $300,000
Description Maintain the affordability of decent housing for low-income Auburn
residents by providing repairs necessary to maintain suitable housing
for low income Auburn homeowners.
Target Date 12/29/2018
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed activities
An estimated 50 low to moderate income families will benefit from the
housing repair program. As the City's largest homeless prevention
program, housing repair ensures the sustainability of a safe home for
some of Auburn's most vulnerable residents. Of the 50 low to moderate
income residents who apply for the program, over half of them are of
the senior and disabled population.
Location Description n/a
Planned Activities Activities include minor home repairs.
2 Project Name ADMINISTRATION
Target Area
Goals Supported Planning and Administration
Needs Addressed
Funding CDBG: $85,578
Description General administration and project management
Target Date 12/29/2017
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed activities
n/a
Location Description n/a
Page 220 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
Planned Activities General planning and administration of the CDBG programs include:
management of the housing repair program, management of all CDBG
related finances, all grant reporting, monitoring of subrecipients and
providing guidance of program implementation in Auburn.
3 Project Name HEALTHPOINT
Target Area
Goals Supported End Homelessness
Needs Addressed Homeless Prevention and Intervention
Funding CDBG: $32,500
Description Providing healthcare services which include medical and dental to 200
or more low to moderate income, Auburn residents.
Target Date 12/29/2018
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed activities
Over 200 low to moderate income Auburn residents will have
benefitted from the proposed activities.
Location Description n/a
Planned Activities Activities include medical and dental services to residents of Auburn.
4 Project Name EMPLOYMENT TRAINING PROGRAM
Target Area
Goals Supported End Homelessness
Needs Addressed Homeless Prevention and Intervention
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description Provide employment training supportive services to approximately 15
low to moderate income Auburn residents so that at least half of them
can find and sustain a job. This project is a public service.
Target Date 12/29/2018
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed activities
15 low to moderate income Auburn residents will benefit from the
employment training program.
Location Description n/a
Page 221 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
Planned Activities Planned activities include employment training supportive services to
Auburn residents.
Page 222 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and
minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The City of Auburn intends on distributing funds throughout the jurisdiction.
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically
Due to the fact that all areas of Auburn have low to moderate income families dispersed
throughout the entire City, the City intends on investing throughout the entire jurisdiction to
ensure that all populations throughout the region have access to beneficial programs and
housing opportunities.
Page 223 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Page 224 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction The City of Auburn will continue to work with service providers, the housing authority and residents in coordination to fully address and develop systems and strategies to promote their efforts in providing sustainable, affordable housing. Auburn's partnerships with organizations such as the King County Housing Authority, Master Builders Association and the Seattle King County Housing Development Consortium have allowed the City to explore new and innovative strategies to continue to offer affordable housing to its current and prospective residents. In 2017, Auburn saw the addition of over 1000 new units of multifamily housing that cater to seniors as well as low to moderate income residents. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City of Auburn will continue to look at policies that remove barriers to affordable housing. The City of Auburn's Comprehensive Land Use Plan includes several policies and objectives that will guide the city toward achieving its affordable and fair housing goals. These policies include maintaining flexibility in land use to achieve a balanced mix of affordable housing opportunities. The City will continue to pursue mixed use developments that are consistent with the transportation oriented developments located in Auburn's downtown. The City will look for opportunities with public and private agencies to implement policies and offer programs that help alleviate physical and economic distress, conserve energy resources, improve the quality and quantity of community services, and eliminate conditions that are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare. In 2017 the City of Auburn passed an ordinance that does not allow landlords of multifamily units to discriminate against potential renters based on their source of income. This means that those seeking housing with income sources such as: SSI/SSDI, Veterans Page 225 of 244
Annual Action Plan 2018 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) benefits, Section 8 vouchers, other forms of income will have the same access to housing as the rest of the community. Page 226 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k)
Introduction
The City of Auburn will continue to work with service providers throughout the region in coordination to
develop systems and strategies to promote their efforts in providing optimal, easily accessible services.
The City will work to reduce the number of families in poverty, sustain relationships with employment
training agencies, and work to preserve the affordable housing stock in our community.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs
By establishing a strong foundation of networks between local service providers, stakeholders and
government agencies through committees and coalitions, the City will work in partnership to address
obstacles and ameliorate barriers to meeting underserved needs. The collaborated organizations will
develop detailed strategic plans that will delegate tasks, build systems and ongoing assessment of service
delivery.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing
The City will continue to maintain the affordability of decent housing for low income Auburn residents by
allocating $300,000 of CDBG funds to the City's Housing Repair Program. The program provides
emergency repairs necessary to maintain safe housing for up to 65 Auburn homeowners, many of whom
are senior citizens and/or are experiencing barriers to safely accessing their homes due to physical
disabilities or impairment.
In addition to Auburn's Housing Repair program, the City will maintain affordable housing by continuing
to engage and partner with coalitions, committees and other government agencies to integrate and
enhance efforts on the issue.
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The City of Auburn will continue to implement U.S. Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD)
regulations to protect residents from lead-based paint hazards in housing that is financially assisted by
the federal government. The requirements apply only to housing built prior to 1980, the year lead-based
paint was banned nationwide for consumers.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families
The City of Auburn's planned actions to reduce the number of poverty- level families include but are not
Page 227 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
25
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
limited to:
• Allocating $10,000 to employment and training programs
• Allocating more than $32,000 to healthcare services targeted at families who are uninsured or
underinsured
• Participate and partner with coalitions, committees and agencies that provide antipoverty
services to develop and enhance strategies and efforts to reduce poverty level families
• Supporting the development and sustainability of affordable multi-family housing in Auburn
• Support and continue to fund programs serving families living in poverty
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The City's planned actions to address the gaps and weaknesses identified in the strategic plan include:
• Maintaining partnerships with and participating in the South King County Housing and
Homelessness Partnership, All Home of King County and other regional human service providers,
coalitions and committees who address homeless issues. The City will also continue to work
collaboratively with partnering organizations and groups to integrate and enhance services to
provide optimal services to individuals and families currently experiencing or at risk of
homelessness. In addition the City will allocate more than $45,000 to emergency shelters and
transitional housing and more than $60,000 to emergency services such as food, financial
assistance, clothing and healthcare.
• Take a comprehensive approach to consolidated and comprehensive planning to include all
internal City departments, commissions, committees and task force.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social
service agencies
The City of Auburn has heavily contributed and intends to continue cultivating relationships between
public and private housing and social service agencies. In addition the City will continue to participate in
collaborations with the South King County Forum on Homelessness, the South King County Council of
Human Services, Seattle-King County Housing Development Consortium and the King County Joint
Planners Meeting.
In 2016 the City of Auburn started participating in Affordable Housing Week through the Housing
Development Consortium along with other public and private housing agencies in King County to continue
our partnerships in providing affordable housing in the region. The City will continue participation in this
annual event and look for other similar opportunities to raise build partnerships to support the
Page 228 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
26
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
preservation and enhanced affordability of housing in our community.
Discussion
The expressed goal of the City's Consolidated Plan is to reduce the number of people living in poverty
within Auburn. The City intends to give funding priority to programs that, in addition to complying with
federal regulations, address a priority outlined in the Consolidated Plan consistent with all of the goals
and objectives identified.
Page 229 of 244
Annual Action Plan
2018
27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018)
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4)
Introduction
The City of Auburn will use all CDBG funds to support projects and activities benefiting low and moderate
income residents. Funds will be used for Public Services and Planning and Administration with the
remaining balance intended for housing rehab services.
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) - Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects
Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be
carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next
program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to
address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not
been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that
benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period
of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit
of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify
the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00%
Discussion
The City of Auburn will continue to use all of its funds to support residents of low/moderate income while
maintaining a focus on underserved and special populations
Page 230 of 244
City of AuburnHousing and Urban DevelopmentCommunity Development Block Grant2018 ACTION PLANPage 231 of 244
Community Development Block GrantThe CDBG Entitlement Program provides annual grants on a formula basis to entitled cities to develop viable urban communities.Projects must:•Align with HUD’s National Objectives•Be eligible under HUD’s guidelines•Benefit low and moderate income personsPage 232 of 244
Examples of Eligible Activities for CBDG Funds•Acquisition of Real Property•Public Facility ADA improvements•Site Preparation•Public Services (15% of annual allocation)•Home Rehabilitation•Code Enforcement•Economic Development Activities•Job Creation for Low‐Income Individuals•Microenterprise Assistance •Homeownership Assistance•Planning and Capacity Building•Program Admin Costs (20% of annual allocation)Page 233 of 244
CDBG Projects Past and Present•Housing Repair Program (Rehabilitation)•Employment Training (Public Service)•Healthcare to under and uninsured Auburn residents (Public Service)•Small Business Assistance (Economic Development)•Les Gove Bathroom ADA Upgrade (Public Facility Improvement)•Downtown Business Façade Upgrades (Economic Development)•Shaughnessy Park Improvements (Public Facility Improvement)Page 234 of 244
Our CDBG Dollars at WorkAuburn’s Housing Repair ProgramPage 235 of 244
Our CDBG Dollars at WorkAuburn’s Housing Repair ProgramPage 236 of 244
Our CDBG Dollars at WorkAuburn’s Housing Repair ProgramPage 237 of 244
CDBG Administrative Requirements•Five Year Consolidated Plan•Eligibility Reviews•Annual Action Plans •Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)•Annual Subrecipient Monitoring•Financial Management•Project Management•Environmental Reviews•Procurement Procedure•Lead MitigationPage 238 of 244
2018 Action Plan•Expected CDBG Funding Allocation: $428,078•Public Services (15% Cap): $42,500•HealthPoint: $32,500•Medical and dental care for un‐ and under‐insured Auburn residents•Multi‐Service Center: $10,000•Job training services for low‐ to moderate‐income Auburn residents•Housing Repair: $300,000•At least 50 low‐ to moderate‐income Auburn homeowners served•Over 50% Seniors or Disabled•Administration (20% Cap): $85,578Page 239 of 244
2018 Action PlanNext Steps:•Public Comment Period•30 Days•Ad in Seattle Times•Email to Service Providers•Public Hearing•Revised Action Plan•Public input reflected in new draft•December 18thCouncil Meeting•Approve Action Plan to submit to HUDPage 240 of 244
Thank you!Questions?Joy ScottHuman Services Manager253‐876‐1965jfscott@auburnwa.govPage 241 of 244
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Matrix
Date:
November 8, 2017
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
Matrix
Special Focus Areas
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:November 13, 2017 Item Number:
Page 242 of 244
Updated 11-06-2017
NO.TOPIC Chair STAFF LEAD(S)STUDY SESSION REVIEW
DATE(S)
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
SUMMARY ACTION DATE
1
Capital Projects Update and
Featured Capital Project
Discussion
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 12/11/2017
2
Community Sustainability
Series: Economic and
Statutory Considerations for
Municipalities
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder Rescheduled for later this year
3 IT Update on Digital Parity Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Haugan 12/11/2017
4 Code Enforcement
Presentation
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 2018
5
Property at 104th and 102nd
and Plans for the Green River
Park
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 12/11/2017
6 118th Avenue SE Roadway
Issue
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 12/11/2017
7 Density Calculation Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 12/11/2017
8 Centers Designation
Overview
Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 12/11/2017
9 Traffic Calming Chair Wagner
Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 2/26/2018
10 Business Shopping Carts Chair Peloza
Vice Chair Baggett Director Snyder 3/1/2018
11 Auburn Avenue Theater Chair Peloza
Vice Chair Baggett Director Faber 1/8/2018
12 Third Quarter Financial Report Chair Baggett
Vice Chair Wagner Director Coleman TBD
13 Council Budget Priorities Chair Baggett
Vice Chair Wagner Director Coleman 11/27/2017
14 Legal Rights for
Undocumented Residents
Chair Trout-Manuel Vice
Chair Wales Director Hinman future meeting
15
Additional funding for the
Community Block Grant
Matching Funds
Chair Trout-Manuel Vice
Chair Wales Director Hinman 11/13/2017
COUNCIL MATRIX
Page 243 of 244
Revised 06-12-2017
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES FINANCE & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC WORKS & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES
HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING CITY BUDGET & AMENDMENTS UTILITIES POLICE
PUBLIC WELLNESS RISK MANAGEMENT ZONING, CODES & PERMITS SCORE JAIL
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT COURT
HOMELESSNESS SERVICES FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION
AFFORDABLE HOUSING CITY REAL PROPERTY STREETS ANIMAL CONTROL
COMMUNITY SERVICES LEGAL ENGINEERING SOLID WASTE
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES CAPITAL PROJECTS EMERGENCY PLANNING
MEDICAL COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY AIRPORT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIRPORT BUSINESSES
CULTURAL ARTS & PUBLIC ARTS SISTER CITIES
PLANNING MULTIMEDIA
Councilmember Trout-Manuel, Chair Councilmember Baggett, Chair Councilmember Wagner, Chair Councilmember Peloza, Chair
Deputy Mayor Wales, Vice Chair Councilmember Wagner, Vice Chair Councilmember DaCorsi, Vice Chair Councilmember Baggett, Vice Chair
2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES
March 13, 2017 March 27, 2017 April 10, 2017 April 24, 2017
May 8, 2017 May 22, 2017June 12, 2017 June 12, 2017May 22, 2017 June 26, 2017
July 10, 2017 July 24, 2017August 14, 2017 August 14, 2017July 24, 2017 August 28, 2017
September 11, 2017 September 25, 2017 October 9, 2017 October 23, 2017
November 13, 2017 November 27, 2017 December 11, 2017 December 26, 2017
SPECIAL FOCUS AREAS
Page 244 of 244