No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-2017 CITY COUNCIL AGENDACity Council Meeting December 18, 2017 - 7:00 P M Auburn Community and Ev ent Center 910 9th Street S E AGE ND A Watch the meeting L IV E ! Watch the meeting video Meeting videos are not available until 72 hours after the meeting has concluded. I .C AL L T O O RD E R A.P ledge of Allegiance B.Roll Call I I .ANNO UNC E M E NT S, P RO C L AM AT IO NS , AND P RE S E NTAT IO NS A.P roclamation for C ouncilmember Richard Wagner Day Mayor B ackus to proclaim December 18, 2017 as Councilmember Richard Wagner D ay in the city of A uburn I I I .AP P O INT M E NT S A.R eappointments to Boards & C ommissions C ity C ouncil to conf irm the reappointments for the f ollowing board and commission members for a new three year term expiring December 31, 2020: Arts C ommission D an Norman Auburn L odging Tax Advisory C ommittee A man G hag Auburn Tourism Board J ulie K rueger R achael Mc A lister B IA Rate Payer C ommittee B ill Cowart Human S ervices C ommittee J ason B erry Marelyn S cholz C ecila B rugger P arks & Recreation Board Michael Hassen Page 1 of 436 P lanning C ommission J udi Roland Urban T ree B oard B ryce L andrud J an S peer White River Valley Historical S ociety R onnie Beyersdorf I V.AG E ND A M O D I F IC AT I O NS V.C I T I ZE N INP UT, P UB L I C HE ARI NG S AND C O RRE S P O ND E NC E A.P ublic Hearings 1.P ublic Hearing for Community D evelopment B lock G rant 2018 A ction Plan City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive public comments and suggestions with regards to the 2018 A nnual A ction P lan as required by the U.S . Department of Housing and Urban D evelopment (S ee R esolution No. 5337 f or additional materials) B.Audience P articipation Thi s i s the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City Counci l on any issue. Those wi shi ng to speak are reminded to sign in on the form provi ded. C .C orrespondence - (T here is no correspondence for Council review.) V I .C O UNC IL AD HO C C O M M IT T E E RE P O RT S C ouncil Ad Hoc C ommittee Chairs may report on the status of their ad hoc Council C ommittees' progress on assigned tasks and may give their recommendation to the C ity Council, if any. V I I .C O NS E NT AG E ND A All matters l isted on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and wi ll be enacted by one moti on in the form listed. A.Minutes of the D ecember 4, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting B.C laims Vouchers C laims vouchers 446795 through 446997 in the amount of $5,609,000.25 and one wire transfer in the amount of $555,364.87 and dated December 17, 2017. C .P ayroll Vouchers P ayroll check numbers 537677 through 537697 in the amount of $240,977.96, electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,925,671.59 f or a grand total of $2,166,649.55 for the period covering November 30, 2017 to December 13, 2017 and Page 2 of 436 dated December 18, 2017. D .P ublic Works Project No. C P 1415 C ity C ouncil to approve F inal P ay E stimate No. 12 to Contract No. 16-12 in the amount of $22,674.76 and accept construction of P roject No. C P 1415, West Main S treet Multi-Modal C orridor and I T S I mprovements E.P ublic Works Project No. C P 1507 C ity C ouncil to approve Change O rder No. 2 in the amount of $100,000.00 to Contract No. 17-02 for work on Project No. C P 1507, Auburn Way North P reservation F.P ublic Works Project No. C P 1522 C ity C ouncil to approve Change O rder No. 3 in the amount of $55,000.00 and F inal P ay E stimate No. 11 to Contract No. 16-19 and accept construction of Project No. C P 1522, 30th Street NE A rea F looding, P hase 1B G.P ublic Works Project No. C P 1613 C ity C ouncil to approve F inal P ay E stimate No. 2 to Contract No. 17-06 in the amount of $26,086.50 and accept construction of P roject No. C P 1613, M&O F acility Building R oof ing Replacement Project H.P ublic Works Project No. C P 1701 C ity C ouncil to approve F inal P ay E stimate No. 2 to Contract No. 17-23 in the amount of $49,930.62 and accept construction of P roject No. C P 1701, AW S Dynamic Message Sign Project (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council approve the Consent Agenda.) V I I I .UNF I NI S HE D B US I NE S S I X.NE W B US INE S S X .O RD I NANC E S A.Ordinance No. 6667 (S nyder) A n O rdinance of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, adopting 2017 A nnual Comprehensive P lan Map and Text A mendments pursuant to the provisions of R C W Chapter 36.70A and adopting corresponding rezones related to certain of the map amendments and creating a new Section 18.01.050 to the city code, relating to planning (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6667.) B.Ordinance No. 6668 (S nyder) A n O rdinance of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington amending S ections 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 and 19.02.140 of the A uburn City Code relating to S chool I mpact F ees (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6668.) X I .RE S O L UT IO NS A.R esolution No. 5323 (Snyder) A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the Page 3 of 436 Mayor to execute a f ourth amendment to the Transit Service Direct F inancial P artnership A greement between the C ity of A uburn, King County and Pierce County P ublic Transit Benefit A uthority (P ierce Transit) (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5323.) B.R esolution No. 5333 (Snyder) A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute an I nterlocal A greement between the City of Auburn and King County D epartment of Transportation relating to the C ommute Trip R eduction Plan (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5333.) C .R esolution No. 5336 (C oleman) A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the C ity of A uburn and R ecology C leanscapes f or a L itter Control and R ecycling P rogram (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5336.) D .R esolution No. 5337 (Hinman) A R esolution of the City Council of the C ity of A uburn, Washington, adopting the 2018 C ommunity Development Block Grant (C D B G) Action P lan f or the C onsolidated Plan Years 2015-2019 (RECOM M ENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5337.) X I I .M AY O R AND C O UNC I L M E M B E R RE P O RT S At this ti me the Mayor and City Council may report on significant i tems associated with their appoi nted positions on federal, state, regional and local organi zations. A.Fr om the Council B.Fr om the M ayor X I I I .AD J O URNM E NT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail . Complete agenda packets are available for revi ew at the City Clerk's Office. Page 4 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Hearing f or Community Development Block Grant 2018 Action Plan Date: December 12, 2017 Department: Administration Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive public comments and suggestions with regards to the 2018 Annual Action Plan as required by HUD. Background Summary: The 2018 Annual Action Plan outlines proposed expenditures to implement the City’s efforts related to its CDBG projects. I t identif ies f ederal and local funds expected to be available, indicates the activities on which they will be spent, and sets goals for the number and type of services expected to be provided. The proposed 2018 Annual Action Plan is a requirement f or the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The Action Plan describes housing and community development needs as well as activities to address those needs. The Action Plan brings together, in one submission, the planning and f unding recommendations for human services, neighborhood revitalization and capital improvements funded by the Community Development Block Grant program. The Plan includes project descriptions, recommended f unding and proposed accomplishments for the 2018 program year. A public notice announcing the December 18, 2017 public hearing and a brief description about the 2018 Action Plan was published in The Seattle Times on November 13, 2017. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Hinman Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:PH.1 Page 5 of 436 Department of Administration Community Services Division 25 West Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 December 3, 2017 Contact: Joy Scott, Human Services Manager. Phone: (253) 876-1965 Email: jfscott@auburnwa.gov NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE 2018 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Auburn, Washington  The City Council will conduct a public hearing in the Auburn City Hall Council Chambers, 25 West Main Street, on Monday, December 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter. The purpose of this public hearing is to solicit public comments on the 2018 CDBG Annual Action Plan prior to its submission of the plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The proposed 2018 Annual Action Plan is a requirement for the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The Action Plan describes housing and community development needs as well as activities to address those needs. The Action Plan brings together the planning and funding recommendations for human services, neighborhood revitalization and capital improvements funded by the Community Development Block Grant program. The Plan includes project descriptions, recommended funding and proposed accomplishments for the 2018 program year. In accordance with 24 CFR 91 of HUD, the City of Auburn solicits comments and public review for its 2018 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Copies of the Consolidated Plan and the 2018 Action Plan are available, at no charge, from the City of Auburn's Community Services Department located at 25 W. Main Street, Auburn, 98001. The deadline for the consideration of written comments and/or suggestions is Monday, December 18, 2017; they may be addressed to Joy Scott with Auburn’s Community Services at the above address, or faxed to (253) 288-3132, prior to the public hearing. Interested citizens may also offer oral comments at the City Council public hearing on Monday, December 18 2017. Non-English speaking residents and citizens with speech, sight, or hearing impairments who wish to review the documents or comment at the public hearing should contact the Auburn Department of Administration. Each request will be considered individually according to the type of assistance required, the availability of resources, and the financial ability of the City to provide accommodation. POSTED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK POSTED ON THE CITY OF AUBURN’S WEBSITE Page 6 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Minutes of the December 4, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 Department: Administration Attachments: Minutes Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Background Summary: Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Number:CA.A Page 7 of 436 Page 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES December 4, 2017 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Nancy Backus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street, and led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call City Councilmembers present: Deputy Mayor Largo Wales, Bob Baggett, Claude DaCorsi, John Holman, Bill Peloza, Yolanda Trout- Manuel, and Rich Wagner. Mayor Nancy Backus was in attendance, and the following department directors and staff members were also present: Finance Director Shelley Coleman, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Chief of Police Bob Lee, Innovation and Technology Director Paul Haugan, Assistant Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Community Development and Public Works Director Kevin Snyder, Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon, Utilities Engineering Manager Lisa Tobin, Human Resources and Risk Management Director Rob Roscoe, Director of Administration Dana Hinman, Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber, and City Clerk Danielle Daskam. II. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation – Stress Less Week Mayor Backus to proclaim December 2-9, 2017, as Stress Less Week in the city of Auburn. Mayor Backus read and presented a proclamation declaring December 2-9, 2017 as Stress Less Week in the city of Auburn to Auburn Mountainview High School DECA students Haley Secrest Bailey Ketchum. Page 8 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 2 B. Proclamation - 2017 Tree Steward Mayor Backus to proclaim First United Methodist Church as Auburn’s “2017 Tree Steward” in the city of Auburn. Mayor Backus read and presented a proclamation declaring the First United Methodist Church as the City’s 2017 Tree Steward for preserving and caring for the Red Cedar tree at 100 N Street SE in Auburn and declaring the tree as a significant tree to Mr. Len Elliott, previous chair of the City of Auburn Urban Tree Board and formerly associated with the First United Methodist Church. Mr. Elliott thanked Mayor Backus and Council for the recognition. Mr. Bryce Landrud, current chair of the Auburn Urban Tree Board, spoke briefly regarding the history of the tree and its merits as a significant tree. III. APPOINTMENTS There was no appointment for Council consideration. IV. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Ordinance No. 6659 was removed from the agenda. It was later announced that Ordinance Nos. 6667 and 6668 were both postponed and removed from the agenda. V. CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE A. Public Hearings 1. 2017-2018 Mid Biennial Budget Public Hearing No. 2 City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive public comments and suggestions with regard to the proposed modifications to the 2017-2018 Biennial Budget. Mayor Backus opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. No one in the audience requested to speak during the budget public hearing, and the hearing was closed. B. Audience Participation This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form provided Page 9 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 3 Bob Zimmerman, 33029 46th Place South Mr. Zimmerman thanked Councilmember Wagner for his service on the Council. Mr. Zimmerman reported on a meeting and site visit with city officials regarding the wall constructed by his neighbor and adjacent to Mr. Zimmerman’s property. He stated the meeting did not alleviate his concerns with the wall. Virginia Cross, 604 24th Street SE, Auburn Ms. Cross spoke regarding Ordinance No. 6667 relating to Comprehensive Plan amendments. Ms. Cross expressed concern with the application of land use and zoning designations to properties under the control of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Virginia Haugen, 2503 R Street SE, Auburn Ms. Haugen expressed opposition to the Business Improvement Area. C. Correspondence There was no correspondence for Council review. VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION At 7:19 p.m. and immediately following Audience Participation, Mayor Backus recessed the meeting to closed session pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(a) to discuss collective bargaining issues, and to executive session pursuant to RCW42.30.110(1)(i) for approximately 20 minutes to discuss potential litigation. City Attorney Heid, Human Resources and Risk Management Director Roscoe, Police Chief Bob Lee, Assistant Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gaub, and Utilities Engineering Manager Lisa Tobin also attended the executive session. Mayor Backus reconvened the meeting at 7:42 p.m. VII. COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS Councilmember Baggett, chair of the Finance ad hoc committee that reviews claims and payroll vouchers, reported he and Councilmember Wagner reviewed the payroll vouchers and electronic deposits in the approximate amount of $2.5 million and claims vouchers and wire transfers in the amount of approximately $1.8 million for the periods November 16-29, 2017 and December 4, 2017, respectively. The ad hoc committee recommends approval of the claims and payroll vouchers as described on the Consent Agenda. Page 10 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 4 VIII. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. A. Minutes of the November 20, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting B. Claims Vouchers Claims vouchers 446641 through 446794 in the amount of $1,157,155.14 and five wire transfers in the amount of $659,562.33 and dated December 4, 2017. C. Payroll Vouchers Payroll check numbers 537610 through 537676 in the amount of $506,337.35, electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,960,977.52 for a grand total of $2,467,314.87 for the period covering November 16, 2017 to November 29, 2017. D. Parks Project No. CP1721 City Council award Contract No. 17-31 to Christensen, Inc. on their low bid of $343,411.51 plus Washington State sales tax of $34,341.15 for a total contract price of $377,752.56 for Project No. CP1721 – Les Gove Restroom Building Replacement. Deputy Mayor Wales moved and Councilmember Baggett seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. In response to a question from Councilmember Peloza, Director Faber explained the project scope for CP1721, Les Gove Restroom Building Replacement, was increased to include a family restroom. There were also increased electrical costs. The increased project costs will be paid from park impact fees. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0 IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. X. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. XI. ORDINANCES Page 11 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 5 A. Ordinance No. 6659 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Section 1.24.010 of the Auburn City Code and creating a new Chapter 9.24 of the Auburn City Code relating to new gross misdemeanor violations concerning drug-related activities Ordinance No. 6659 was removed from the agenda. B. Ordinance No. 6665 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6621, the 2017-2018 Biennial Budget, as amended by Ordinance No. 6646 and Ordinance No. 6656, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2017-2018 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 6665. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0. C. Ordinance No. 6666 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6621, the 2017-2018 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6646, Ordinance No. 6656, and Ordinance No.. 6665, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2017-2018 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 6666. MOTION CARRIED UNANMOUSLY. 7-0 D. Ordinance No. 6667 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to planning; adopting the 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 36.70A and adopting corresponding rezones related to certain map amendments Ordinance No. 6667 was removed from the agenda. Page 12 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 6 E. Ordinance No. 6668 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington amending Sections 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 and 19.02.140 of the Auburn City Code relating to School Impact Fees Ordinance No. 6668 was removed from the agenda. F. Ordinance No. 6669 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Section 2.82.020 of the Auburn City Code relating to the Auburn Poet Laureate Deputy Mayor Wales moved and Councilmember Trout-Manuel seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 6669. MOTION CARRIED UANANIMOUSLY. 7-0 XII. RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 5330 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute the Deed Restriction-Restrictive Covenant for city-owned parcels 1221049037, 1221049038, 1221049039, 1221049007 required as a condition of W ashington Department of Ecology grant funding Deputy Mayor Wales moved and Councilmember Trout-Manuel seconded to adopt Resolution No. 5330. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0 B. Resolution No. 5331 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, endorsing use of the 2018 Valley Regional Fire Authority Fee Schedule as adopted by the VRFA Board of Governance Councilmember DaCorsi moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to adopt Resolution No. 5331. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0 C. Resolution No. 5332 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute a First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement 2 for the Lea Hill Intertie Project between Covington Page 13 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 7 Water District, King County Water District No. 111 and the City of Auburn Resolution No. 5332 was added to the agenda. Councilmember Wagner moved and Councilmember Baggett seconded to adopt Resolution No. 5332. Councilmember Wagner stated the Resolution approves an amendment to the wholesale water agreement with Water District No. 111 and Covington Water District to extend the ability of the Districts to purchase “interruptible” water from the City. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0 D. Resolution No. 5334 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the City of Auburn and the Auburn Police Management Association for 2016-2018 Resolution No. 5334 was added to the agenda. Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to adopt Resolution No. 5334. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0 XIII. MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS A. From the Council Deputy Mayor Wales reported Holy Family Church provided 52 shut-in families with Thanksgiving dinner and also provided another 1,000 people with Thanksgiving dinner. Deputy Mayor Wales reported the Junior City Council met earlier today. The Junior City Council will be adjusting their meeting schedule, developing a budget, and providing quarterly reports to the City Council. Members of the Junior City Council will also be participating in Youth Action Days at the state capitol in January 2018. Councilmember Peloza reported on his attendance at the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) meeting and the Cities and Schools Forum. Page 14 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 8 Councilmember Trout-Manuel reported on her attendance at an Auburn School District Drug and Alcohol Prevention Coalition workshop, a tour of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe reservation, and the Red, White and Blue Concert. Councilmember Trout-Manuel shared that her Lions Club president project was just completed and consisted of service club signs throughout the city. Councilmember Baggett reported on his attendance at the Dave and Buster’s pre-grand opening Sunday night and their official ribbon cutting ceremony this morning. Councilmember Holman reported on his participation in the Rotary Club’s take-a-kid-to-work day where three students from Mountainview High School, Auburn High School, and Riverside High School shadowed him for a morning at City Hall. Councilmember Holman also reported on his attendance at the Puget Sound Regional Council Growth Management Policy Board meeting where the board discussed the regional centers framework. Councilmember Wagner commented on the regional centers framework and the importance of being designated as a center in order to be eligible for funding. Councilmember Wagner also commented on the Cities and Schools Forum, which enables a dialogue among the education community and the cities of Algona, Pacific and Auburn. B. From the Mayor Mayor Backus reported that she and Councilmember Peloza assisted with serving the Thanksgiving lunches provided on November 21st at the Senior Center; the Senior Center served over 300 during two seatings. Mayor Backus reported several students from the Sister City of Guanghan, Sichuan Province, China, visited City Hall. Mayor Backus announced she is a co-chair with King County Executive Dow Constantine and Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkin of a new initiative called One Table to address homelessness throughout King County. Mayor Backus reported on her attendance at the Sound Cities Association annual networking dinner where Councilmember Wagner was recognized for his public service. Mayor Backus also reported on her attendance at the Santa Parade and tree lighting at City Hall, the Red, White and Blue Concert, Dave and Buster’s pre-grand opening, and a visit to Wesley Homes. Page 15 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 9 XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. APPROVED THE ______ DAY OF ___________________, 2017. NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR Danielle Daskam, City Clerk City Council agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk’s Office, on the City website, and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office. Internet: http://www.auburnwa.gov Page 16 of 436 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes December 4, 2017 Page 10 Page 17 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Claims Vouchers Date: December 12, 2017 Department: Finance Attachments: No Attachments Av ailable Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve the claims vouchers. Background Summary: Claims vouchers 446795 through 446997 in the amount of $5,609,000.25 and one wire transfer in the amount of $555,364.87 and dated December 17, 2017. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Number:CA.B Page 18 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Payroll Vouchers Date: December 12, 2017 Department: Finance Attachments: No Attachments Av ailable Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: approve payroll vouchers Background Summary: Payroll check numbers 537677 through 537697 in the amount of $240,977.96, electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,925,671.59 f or a grand total of $2,166,649.55 for the period covering November 30, 2017 to December 13, 2017 and dated December 18, 2017. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Number:CA.C Page 19 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1415 Date: December 11, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Final Pay Es timate No. 12 Vicinity Map Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 12 to Contract No. 16-12 in the amount of $22,674.76 and accept construction of Project No. CP1415, W est Main Street Multi-Modal Corridor and ITS Improvements. Background Summary: This project repurposed the existing West Main S t. corridor and built the I ntelligent Transportation S ystem (I T S ) improvements. Roadway improvements included converting the existing f our-lane West Main St. roadway section to a three-lane section including center two- way left turn lane with new bike lanes, new sidewalks, street trees, and new L E D street lighting improvements between West Valley Highway and the I nterurban Trail. I T S I mprovements included interconnecting and coordinating traffic signals from C St. NW along West Main St. to West Valley Highway (W V H), south to 15th St. S W including two interchanges with SR-18 and one with SR-167. A project budget contingency of $64,004.00 remains in the 102 Arterial Street Fund. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:CA.D Page 20 of 436 Project No: CP1415 Project Title: Project Manager: Kim Truong Date: 12/5/17 2015 Mid Biennial Adjustment Initiation Date: __12/23/14_______ Permision to Advertise Advertisement Date: __6/10/16______ Contract Award Award Date: ___7/18/16________ Change Order Approval Final Acceptance Funding 2014 (actual)2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2017 Total 518 Fund - Information Services 42,586 42,586 102 Fund - Traffic Impact Fees 4,538 32,408 359,650 100,000 496,595 102 Fund - Arterial Street 48,347 65,471 113,818 102 Fund - Federal Grant 179,025 2,186,593 1,193,870 3,559,487 Total 4,538 211,432 2,594,590 1,401,927 4,212,486 Activity 2014 (actual)2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2017 Total Design Engineering - City Costs 4,120 38,773 64,824 107,717 Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 172,509 350,401 522,910 Other/Misc.418 3,397 3,293 7,108 Permitting 150 10,787 10,937 Construction Contract 2,021,607 1,151,659 3,173,267 Change Order 1 109,571 109,571 Line Item Changes 5,385 5,385 Testing Services 16,124 16,124 Construction Engineering - City Costs 102,375 84,566 186,941 Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 41,199 9,912 51,111 Total 4,538 211,432 2,594,591 1,380,509 4,191,069 2014 (actual)2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2,017 Total *102/105 Funds Budgeted ( )(4,538) (211,432) (2,594,590) (1,401,927) (4,212,487) 102/105 Funds Needed 4,538 211,432 2,594,591 1,337,923 4,148,483 *102/105 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (0)0 (64,004) (64,004) 102/105 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0 2014 (actual)2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2,017 Total *518 Funds Budgeted ( )0 0 0 (42,586) (42,586) 518 Funds Needed 0 0 0 42,586 42,586 *518 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 0 0 0 518 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0 BUDGET STATUS SHEET West Main Street Multi-Modal Corridor and ITS Improvements * ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) 102/105 Arterial Street Budget Status 518 Information Services Budget Status Page 21 of 436 Page 22 of 436 Page 23 of 436 Page 24 of 436 Page 25 of 436 Page 26 of 436 CP1415 West Main Street Multi-Modal Corridor and ITS ImprovementsWC ST SWCity M & OBuildingINTERURBAN TRAILPage 27 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1507 Date: December 11, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Vicinity Map Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $100,000.00 to Contract No. 17- 02 for work on Project No. CP1507, Auburn Way North Preservation. Background Summary: Change Order No. 2 covers additional costs for traf f ic control labor and for temporary pavement markings that were required during the time the existing pavement on Auburn Way North between 22nd Street NE and 45th Street NE was ground of f awaiting for the new pavement to be placed. With Auburn W ay North being a highly traveled corridor, and the requirement to maintain traffic during work operations, the traffic control labor and temporary markings f or the various lane adjustments required was much greater than anticipated. A project increase of $100,000.00 within the 105 Street Preservation f und will be necessary, however it will not require a budget adjustment since it is anticipated that the total budgeted expenditures in the 105 Street Preservation fund will not be exceeded this year. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:CA.E Page 28 of 436 Project No: CP1507 Project Title: Project Manager: Kevin Thompson Date: Dec. 11, 2017 Initiation Date: __2/25/15_______ Permision to Advertise Advertisement Date: __2/7/17______ Contract Award Award Date: __3/20/17_________ Change Order 2 Contract Final Acceptance Funding Prior Years 2017 2018 Total 105 Fund - Unrestricted 149,001 823,499 0 972,500 105 Fund - Federal Grant 80,117 887,383 0 967,500 431 Fund - Sewer 3,105 60,821 0 60,000 432 Fund - Storm 14,873 73,127 0 88,000 460 Fund - Water 0 35,955 0 35,955 Total 247,096 1,880,785 0 2,088,000 Activity Prior Years 2017 2018 Total Design Engineering - City Costs 205,543 0 205,543 Total Construction Contract Bid 1,589,151 0 1,589,151 Authorized Contingency Remaining 68,050 0 68,050 Change Order No. 1 31,950 0 31,950 Change Order No. 2 100,000 0 100,000 Construction Engineering - City Costs 135,000 0 135,000 Construction Engineering - Materials Testing 20,000 0 20,000 Construction Engineering - WSDOT 1,000 0 1,000 Total 205,543 1,845,151 0 2,150,694 Prior Years 2017 2018 Total *105 Funds Budgeted ( )(149,001)(1,710,882)0 (1,859,883) 105 Funds Needed 187,348 1,771,643 0 1,958,991 *105 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 0 0 105 Funds Required 38,347 60,761 0 99,108 Prior Years 2017 2018 Total *461 Funds Budgeted ( )(3,105)(60,821)0 (63,926) 461 Funds Needed 3,105 60,161 0 63,266 *461 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (660)0 (660) 461 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 Prior Years 2017 2018 Total *462 Funds Budgeted ( )(14,873)(73,127)0 (88,000) 462 Funds Needed 14,873 66,890 0 81,763 *462 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (6,237)0 (6,237) 462 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 Prior Years 2016 (Actuals)2018 Total *460 Funds Budgeted ( )0 (35,955)0 (35,955) 460 Funds Needed 0 35,565 0 35,565 *460 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (390)0 (390) 460 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 * ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. 461 Sewer Budget Status 462 Storm Budget Status 460 Water Budget Status 105 Arterial Street Budget Status BUDGET STATUS SHEET Auburn Way North Preservation Project The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) \\coa.auburn.local\dept\Building\PROJ\CP1507-AWN Preservation Project\4.00 City Council-Committee\Change Order No. 2\Change Order No 2 - CP1507 BudgetStatusSheet Final.xls 1 of 1Page 29 of 436 Auburn Way North Preservation Printed Date: Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS 5/6/2014 Auburn Way North Preservation Project Page 30 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1522 Date: December 11, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Vicinity Map Final Pay Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Change Order No. #3 in the amount of $55,000.00 and Final Pay Estimate No. 11 to Contract No. 16-19 and accept construction of Project No. CP1522, 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B. Background Summary: The project scope included constructing a new 42-inch storm line from the intersection of 30th Street NE and ‘I’ Street NE to the existing Brannan Park Pump Station. The new storm pipe replaced the existing 30-inch storm pipe to relieve street flooding that results f rom the limited capacity of the existing 30-inch line to convey the storm water to its current Brannan Park Pump Station discharge point. This project is a continuation of the 30th Street NE Area Flooding Phase 1A project, where a new 42-inch storm line was installed along 30th Street NE from ‘C’ Street NE to ‘I’ Street NE in Summer of 2015. The project also included a joint utility trench within a private alleyway for PSE and Comcast work. Change Order No. 3 allocates additional f unds to the Contract to address contractor invoices related to erosion control measures, unsuitable soils excavation and changes to the f oundation material in the utility trenches, and additional restoration of private properties within the existing storm easement area. A project budget contingency of $5,082.20 remains in the 462 Storm Fund. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:CA.F Page 31 of 436 Page 32 of 436 Project No: CP1522 Project Manager: Kim Truong 2015 Mid Biennial Adjustment Initiation Date: _ 1/7/13 _ Permision to Advertise Advertisement Date: 6/16/14 Contract Award Award Date: 8/15/16 Carry Forward to 2017 >>> Change Order 3 and Final Acceptance Date: 11/20/2017 Funding 2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2017 Total 462 Fund - Storm* 4,932 1,302,059 1,282,794 2,589,785 Total 4,932 1,302,059 1,282,794 2,589,785 Activity 2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2017 Current Total Design Engineering - City Costs 992 15,566 16,559 Design Engineering - Consultant 3,940 14,423 18,363 Permits and Misc.1,775 1,775 PSE and Comcast Joint Utility Trench 17,885 17,885 Construction Contract 1,126,900 679,166 1,806,067 Change Order #1 - council approved 273,750 273,750 Change Order #2 58,300 58,300 Change Order #3 55,000 55,000 Line Item Changes 107,835 107,835 Construction Engineering - Consultant 75,983 6,881 82,864 Construction Engineering - City Costs 67,411 78,894 146,305 Total 4,932 1,302,059 1,277,712 2,584,703 2015 (actual) 2016 (actual) 2017 Total *462 Funds Budgeted ( )(4,932) (1,302,059) (1,282,794)(2,589,785) 462 Funds Needed 4,932 1,302,059 1,277,712 2,584,703 *462 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 (5,082) (5,082) 462 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 * ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. BUDGET STATUS SHEET 30th Street NE Area Flooding - Phase 1B The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. 462 Storm Budget Status Page 33 of 436 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B Vicinity Map July 2016 Not to Scale Note to Scale Project Site Page 34 of 436 Page 35 of 436 City Of Auburn 16-19 CP1522 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B 16-19/#11 Period Dates Begin: 10.21.2017 End: 11.20.2017 2 of 4 CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTALITEM NO.SCHEDULE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY QUANTITY COST VALUE OF MATERIALS STORED TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST % EST. QTY. 001 A Minor Changes EqAdj $25,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.9894 $49,733.45 198.93 002 A SPCC Plan LS $2,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $2,500.00 100 003 A Utility Potholing EA $1,500.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 15.0000 $22,500.00 750.0 004 A Record Drawings (Min. Bid $1000) LS $4,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $4,500.00 100 005 A Construction Site Sign(s)EA $ 500.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.0000 $1,000.00 100 006 A Mobilization LS $124,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $124,500.00 100 007 A Trafic Control Supervisor LS $19,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $19,500.00 100 008 A Traffic Control Labor (Min. Bid $38.00 per hour) HR $ 44.00 640.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1664.5000 $73,238.00 260.08 009 A Sequential Arrow Sign DAY $ 120.00 20.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.0000 $ 240.00 10.0 010 A Portable Changeable Message Sign DAY $ 120.00 20.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 8.0000 $ 960.00 40.0 011 A Clearing and Grubbing LS $16,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $16,500.00 100 012 A Removal of Structures and Obstructions LS $2,500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $2,500.00 100 013 A Remove and Reset Fence LF $ 12.00 560.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 645.0000 $7,740.00 115.18 014 A Remove and Reset Bench EA $ 500.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $ 500.00 100 015 A Removal of Concrete or Asphalt Pavement SY $ 4.10 1,441.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1612.8800 $6,612.81 111.93 016 A Remove Cement Concrete Flat Work SY $ 11.00 180.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 320.0000 $3,520.00 177.78 017 A Removal of Curb and Gutter LF $ 6.00 45.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 360.0000 $2,160.00 800 018 A Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl. Haul CY $ 25.00 800.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 197.3200 $4,933.00 24.67 019 A Active Shoring System, Complete SF $ 42.30 5,000.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 5000.0000 $211,500.00 100 020 A Crushed Surfacing Base Course TON $ 24.00 810.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 939.4300 $22,546.32 115.98 021 A HMA Cl. 1/2-inch PG 64-22 (Class B) TON $ 85.00 190.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 351.9200 $29,913.20 185.22 022 A HMA Cl. 1-inch PG 64-22 (Class E) TON $ 85.00 490.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 380.1000 $32,308.50 77.57 023 A Asphalt Cold Patch TON $ 140.00 60.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 243.0800 $34,031.20 405.13 024 A Solid Wall Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Storm Pipe, SDR-21, 6- Inch Diam. LF $ 38.00 226.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 226.0000 $8,588.00 100 025 A Solid Wall Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Storm Pipe, SDR-21, 8- Inch Diam. LF $ 46.00 55.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 55.0000 $2,530.00 100 Page 36 of 436 City Of Auburn 16-19 CP1522 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B 16-19/#11 Period Dates Begin: 10.21.2017 End: 11.20.2017 3 of 4 ITEM NO.SCHEDULE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS CONTRACT THIS PERIOD VALUE OF MATERIALS STORED TOTAL % EST. QTY.UNIT COST QUANTITY QUANTITY COST TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST 026 A Solid Wall Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Storm Pipe, SDR-21, 12- Inch Diam. LF $ 115.00 7.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 7.0000 $ 805.00 100 027 A Solid Wall Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Storm Pipe, PS46, 18-Inch Diam. LF $ 88.55 69.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 69.0000 $6,109.95 100 028 A Polypropylene Storm Pipe, 42- Inch Diam. (ASTM F2764) LF $ 238.00 1,937.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1937.0000 $461,006.00 100 029 A Storm Sewer Television Inspection LF $ 4.40 2,290.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1836.4000 $8,080.16 80.19 030 A Catch Basin Type 1 EA $1,400.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3.0000 $4,200.00 300 031 A Catch Basin Type 2, 48-Inch Diam. EA $2,610.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.0000 $5,220.00 100 032 A Manhole, Type 3 - 84-Inch Diam.EA $11,975.00 6.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 6.0000 $71,850.00 100 033 A Manhole, Type 3 - 96-Inch Diam.EA $18,930.00 3.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.5000 $47,325.00 83.33 034 A Connect to Existing Drainage Structure EA $2,200.00 5.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 5.0000 $11,000.00 100 035 A Imported Pipe Bedding TON $ 16.00 600.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3377.4400 $54,039.04 562.91 036 A Pipe Foundation Material TON $ 18.00 1,000.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 808.2700 $14,548.86 80.83 037 A Imported Pipe Trench Backfill TON $ 14.00 6,000.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 5837.3800 $81,723.32 97.29 038 A Select Pipe Trench Backfill CY $ 35.00 100.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 100.0000 $3,500.00 100 039 A Controlled Density Fill (CDF) for Filling Pipe CY $ 110.00 370.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 20.0000 $2,200.00 5.41 040 A Trench Shoring System SF $ 1.15 25,100.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 24376.5000 $28,032.99 97.12 041 A 6-Inch Diam. PVC Side Sewer with 6-Inch Diam. PVC Cleanout LF $ 82.00 80.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 042 A General Permit Documentation Compliance LS $5,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.9960 $4,980.00 99.60 043 A Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Sediment Control EqAdj $20,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.6783 $33,568.57 167.84 044 A ECS Lead DAY $ 250.00 60.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 39.0000 $9,750.00 65.00 045 A High Visibility Fencing Installation and Removal LF $ 3.50 1,000.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 428.0000 $1,498.00 42.80 046 A Wattle LF $ 5.10 1,880.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1932.0000 $9,853.20 102.77 047 A Inlet Protection EA $ 100.00 16.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 20.0000 $2,000.00 125.00 048 A Topsoil Type A CY $ 31.00 440.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 330.0000 $10,230.00 75.00 049 A Lawn Sod SY $ 2.90 2,630.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 Page 37 of 436 City Of Auburn 16-19 CP1522 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B 16-19/#11 Period Dates Begin: 10.21.2017 End: 11.20.2017 4 of 4 ITEM NO.SCHEDULE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS CONTRACT THIS PERIOD VALUE OF MATERIALS STORED TOTAL % EST. QTY.UNIT COST QUANTITY QUANTITY COST TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST 050 A PSIPE Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), 7-foot Height EA $ 500.00 3.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 051 A Irrigation System Repair EqAdj $5,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3.2723 $16,361.25 327.23 052 A Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter LF $ 50.00 45.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 370.0000 $18,500.00 822.22 053 A Dewatering System LF $ 60.00 2,400.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2400.0000 $144,000.00 100 054 A Industrial and Commercial Driveway Apron SY $ 110.00 30.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 23.5000 $2,585.00 78.33 055 A Raised Pavement Marker Type 2 EA $ 25.00 20.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 056 A Temporary Security (Chain Link) Fence LF $ 3.75 584.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1650.0000 $6,187.50 282.53 057 A Monument Type B (Modified)EA $ 425.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $ 425.00 50.0 058 A Cement Concrete Sidewalk SY $ 42.00 144.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 475.7200 $19,980.24 330.36 059 A Paint Line LF $ 4.00 145.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 309.0000 $1,236.00 213.10 060 A Plastic Wide Line LF $ 4.00 475.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 501.0000 $2,004.00 105.47 061 A Plastic Crosswalk Stripe and Stop Bar (24 inch wide) LF $ 9.00 150.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 137.0000 $1,233.00 91.33 062 A Plastic Traffic Arrow EA $ 250.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.0000 $ 500.00 100 063 A Plastic Bicycle Lane Symbol EA $ 300.00 2.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2.0000 $ 600.00 100 064 A Plastic Traffic Letter EA $ 125.00 4.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 065 A Removing of Plastic Markings LS $ 650.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $ 650.00 100 066 A Temporary Pavement Markings LF $ 0.25 500.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 20.0000 $ 5.00 4.00 067 A Joint Utility Trench LF $ 42.00 250.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 250.0000 $10,500.00 100 5001 A Schedule A Sales Tax LS $156,690.73 2.00 0.0000 $5,000.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $201,533.07 105.66 A ROW LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK B ROW LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK CO1-1 A Incremental Dewatering System Costs LS $250,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $250,000.00 100 CO2-1 A Property Restoration Est.$50,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.3715 $18,577.06 37.15 CO2-2 A Cement Concrete Curb Ramp Est.$3,000.00 1.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.0000 $ 0.00 0 CO3-1 A FInal Settlement LS $50,000.00 1.00 1.0000 $50,000.00 $ 0.00 1.0000 $50,000.00 100 Page 38 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1613 Date: December 11, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Final Pay Es timate No. 2 Vicinity Map Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Contract No. 17-06 in the amount of $26,086.50 and accept construction of Project No. CP1613, M&O Facility Building Roofing Replacement Project. Background Summary: I n recent years, the aging roof at the City’s Maintenance and Operation Facility building saw a f air amount of repair due to reoccurring leaks. The purpose of this project was to install a roof retro-fit system, replacing damaged insulation, installing a new roof membrane, coping metals and roof related sheet metal. A project budget contingency of $15,189.00 remains in the 328 Capital Facilities fund. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:CA.G Page 39 of 436 Project No: CP1613 Project Title: M&O Facility Building Roof Replacement Project Project Manager: Luis Barba PMP Permision to Award Advertisement Date: 6/8/2017 Project Update Award Date: 7/3/2017 Change Order Approval Contract Final Acceptance Funding Prior Years 2016 (Actual) 2017 Total Facilities Fund 328-(Maintenance)0 13,244 279,456 292,700 Total 0 13,244 279,456 292,700 Activity Prior Years 2016 (Actual) 2017 Total Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 13,244 8,779 22,023 Design Engineering - Other 299 299 Construction Contract 247,500 247,500 Line Item Changes 5,214 5,214 Construction Permits 661 661 Construction Engineering-Consultant 1,815 1,815 Construction Engineering-City Cost*0 Total 0 13,244 264,267 277,511 *Engineering costs are charged to the Engineering Budget and not shown here. Prior Years 2016 (Actual) 2017 Total *Facilities Funds Budgeted ( )0 (13,244) (279,456) (292,700) Facilities Funds Needed 0 13,244 264,267 277,511 *Facilities Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 (15,189) (15,189) Facilities Funds Required 0 0 0 0 * ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. Faciltites Fund Budget Status BUDGET STATUS SHEET Date: December 05, 2017 The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) H:\PROJ\CP1613 M&O Facility Building Roofing Replacement Project\3.00 Project Management\3.20 Budget\CP1613-M&O Roof Imprv BudgetStatusSheet.xls 1 of 1Page 40 of 436 Page 41 of 436 Page 42 of 436 1,387.8 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet1,387.8 Notes Legend 693.90 1:8,327 CP1613-M&O Facility Roof Replacement Project 1in =694 ft 11/14/2017Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Streets Streets County Railroads Airport Emerald Downs Parks Auburn City Limits Potential Annexation Areas Buildings Street Surface Sidewalks Driveways Parking Streams Water Features Auburn City Limits Fill Political Boundaries Counties M&O Facility Building-Roof Replacement Project Page 43 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1701 Date: December 11, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Final Pay Es timate No. 2 Vicinity Map Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Contract No. 17-23 in the amount of $49,930.62 and accept construction of Project No. CP1701, AWS Dynamic Message Sign Project. Background Summary: The purpose of this project was to expand I T S operations by installing a D ynamic Message S ign (D MS ) on A uburn Way S outh between the R Street S E bridge and Muckleshoot P laza Road. T he proposed I T S infrastructure included installation of fiber optics, the D MS signage, running conductor from the new service meter at the northwest corner of Muckleshoot Plaza Rd through an existing conduit to D MS controller and connecting the system to the existing f iber optic network. A project budget contingency of $22,406.00 remains in the 102 Street Fund. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:CA.H Page 44 of 436 Project No: CP1701 Project Title: Project Manager: Luis Barba Project Update Permission to Advertise Advertisement Date: _6/15/2017 Contract Award Award Date: 7/03/2017 Change Order Approval Contract Final Acceptance Funding Prior Years 2017 Future Years Total 102 Fund - REET 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Activity Prior Years 2017 Future Years Total Design Engineering - City Costs 8,726 8,726 Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 3,500 3,500 Design-Other 182 182 Construction Contract 65,390 65,390 Line Item Changes 3,107 3,107 Construction Procurement Material 78,689 78,689 Construction Engineering - City Costs 17,000 17,000 Construction Engineering - Testing Costs 1,000 1,000 Total 177,594 177,594 Prior Years 2017 Future Years Total *102 Funds Budgeted ( )(200,000) (200,000) 102 Funds Needed 177,594 177,594 *102 Fund Project Contingency ( )(22,406) (22,406) 102 Funds Required 0 0 * ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. 102 Arterial Street Budget Status Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) BUDGET STATUS SHEET AWS Dynamic Message Sign Project Date:December 5, 2017 The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) H:\PROJ\CP1701-AWS Dynamic Message Sign\3.00 Project Management\3.20 Budget\CP1701 ITS DMS BudgetStatusSheet.xls 1 of 1Page 45 of 436 Page 46 of 436 Page 47 of 436 Page 48 of 436 3,098.6 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet3,098.6 Notes Type any additional notes- delete text to leave blank Legend 1,549.30 1:18,591 Vicinity Map AWS Dynamic Message Sign 1in =1,549 ft 6/26/2017Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. New Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) Page 49 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6667 (Snyder) Date: December 11, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: Agenda Bill Ordinance No. 6667 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6667. Background Summary: See the attached agenda bill. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Other: Legal, Planning Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:ORD.A Page 50 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 59 Agenda Subject: Ordinance #6667 CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17-0002, REZ17- 0003, & REZ17-0004, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Map and Policy/Text Amendments and Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Dept. Attachments: Ordinance # 6667 See separate map amendment & policy/text amendment sections of working binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and approve Ordinance # 6667 amending the Comprehensive Plan to include 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Map and Policy/Text Amendments and four associated rezones (zoning map amendments). Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. The City adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan in December 2015. Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). This year the city is initiating:  Nine policy/text amendments  Seventeen map amendments Also, the city received one private-initiated plan map amendment by the June 9, 2017 submittal deadline. This staff report and Planning Commission recommendation addresses all of this year’s amendments consisting of:  CPA17-0001, Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (P/T) # 1-9 – City-initiated applications  CPA17-0001, Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPM) # 1–17 - City-initiated applications  CPA17-0002, Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – private-initiated application Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Snyder Meeting Date: December 4, 2017 Item Number: Page 51 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 2 of 59 I. Background The Planning Commission conducted two hearings on Comprehensive Plan Annual Amendments, consisting of map and policy/text amendments. At its October 18, 2017 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the following set of Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments: A. Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments (File #CPA17-0001 – City-Initiated): P/T #1 – Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #2 – Incorporate Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #3 – Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #4 – Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #5 – Incorporate City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan P/T #6 - Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R10, R16, and R20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). P/T #7 - Add text to add back the R5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family" Land Use Designation. The 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comp. Plan land use designation and must be corrected. P/T #8 - Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide a distinct and logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. P/T #9 - Add the "R-10, Residential" and R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. In the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comp. Plan land use designation. B. Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA17-0001 – City-Initiated) CPM #1 - Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map. "The R-10, R-16 and R- 20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). (See also related P/T #6) CPM #2 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 2.23-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. CPM #3 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 4 privately-owned, previously developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" to recognize and be more compatible with developed status of the properties at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution and outdoor storage. At its November 1, 2017 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the following set of Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Page 52 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 3 of 59 A. Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA17-0001 – City-Initiated) CPM #4 - Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately- owned developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Parcel owned by Quality Fence Co. and located on south side of 21st ST SE, 390 feet east of A ST SE. CPM #5 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately owned and 1 city-owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Parcels are located at the SW corner of Main and Division Street. CPM #6 - Change the mapped land use designation of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117 & 8581400530. CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal jurisdiction parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. The 3 parcels controlled by the Muckleshoot Tribe are developed as a cemetery and thus, the land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Both parcels are located on east side of A ST SE, south of Lakeland Hills WY SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. CPM #9 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". Both parcels are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #10 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Parcel is located 130 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL. (30811 124TH AVE SE). Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #11 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel is located south of SR 18 at west end of 8th ST SW. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #12 - Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel is located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #13 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcels are located Page 53 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 4 of 59 on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #14 - Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Parcels are at various locations in downtown. Some are City-owned; others are privately owned. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #15 - Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Parcels are at various locations. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. CPM #16 - Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with rest of the plat. Parcel is owned by the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #17 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel is located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. B. Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA17-0002 – Private-Initiated) Application by Nexus Youth & Families to change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels from “Single Family” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial” and change the zoning designation from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. The parcels totaling 0.72 acres are owned or proposed for purchase by Nexus Youth & Families are located between Auburn Way S. and ‘H’ St. SE, approximately 120 ft. south of 9th St. SE. The addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. In short, with conclusion of the two hearings the Planning Commission has forwarded its recommendation for “approval” to the City Council on all of the year 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. At the November 27, 2017 City Council Study Session, the Council reviewed and discussed the set of annual comprehensive plan amendments and four associated rezones (zoning map amendments). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Comprehensive Plan Related Findings 1. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to provide a policy basis for development regulations to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and implementing regulations are consistent, as required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) and the following City Code provision: Page 54 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 5 of 59 “14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan.” 2. RCW 36.70A.130 (The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides the process for amendments to locally adopted GMA-compliant comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and repeated in City Code Section 14.22.060, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city no more frequently than once per year. 3. The City of Auburn established a Friday, June 9, 2017 deadline for the submittal of private- initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, published in the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in April 2017. The City received only one private-initiated plan map amendment (Nexus Youth & Families CPA17-0002 & REZ17- 0001). The City received no applications for policy/text amendments by the submittal deadline. 4. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are referenced in the Capital Facilities element, of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared individually by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by state law. 6. The City conducted the environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the city-initiated policy/text and map amendments. This resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) (File #SEP17-0014) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 19, 2017. The comment period ended October 3, 2017 and the appeal period ended October 17, 2017. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder. Also, the City conducted the environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the private-initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (File #CPA 17-0002) and Rezone. This resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) (File # SEP17- 0012), for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezone request issued on August 24, 2017. The comment period ended September 8, 2017 and the appeal period ended September 22, 2017. One public comment was submitted (See Exhibit 8 under “CPA 17- 0002” at end of working binder); no appeal was filed. 7. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22, (Amendments) outlines the process for submittal of private-initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: Page 55 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 6 of 59 “Section 14.22.100, (Public Hearing Required by Planning Commission.) A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 8. Thus, Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. 9. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 10. Due to the nature of the city-initiated amendments and the scope and limited number of private-initiated amendments, the optional process available in the city code for staff to hold a public open house was not conducted. Page 56 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 7 of 59 11. With the City adoption of a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan in December 2015, the need for some policy/text amendments and map amendments is needed to correct some inadvertent changes. The changes are necessary to increase the consistency of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning as required by ACC 14.22.050, “Conformance and Consistency”. Each of the Policy/Text (P/T) and map (CPM) changes are shown in greater detail behind the respective tabs of the ‘Working Binder’. 12. Three public notices were provided for the two different hearings. A public hearing notice was published on October 5, 2017 in the Seattle Times newspaper which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing conducted on October 18, 2017 and public hearing notices were published on October 17, 2017 (CPA17-0002-The private-initiated map amendment was noticed separately.) and on October 21, 2017 (CPA17-0001) in the Seattle Times newspaper which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing conducted on November 1, 2017. III. Zoning Code Related Findings 13. In June 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 which allows the Planning Commission and City Council to consider associated map changes (for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently. This eliminates the need for the rezone (zoning map amendment) to subsequently be heard and decided by the Hearing Examiner through a separately scheduled hearing when it is related to a Comprehensive Plan map amendment. 14. Chapter 18.68 ACC (Zoning) Amendments)) outlines the process for submittal of private- initiated zoning amendments and the process. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b), when the Planning Commission is considering a rezone (zoning map amendment) which requires a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, the public hearings shall be conducted concurrently and a recommendation on both shall be forwarded to the City Council. -------------------OCTOBER 18, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING----------------- Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) P/T #1 Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 - 2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2017-2023. The CFP was prepared by the district staff and adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Directors on June 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family Page 57 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 8 of 59 dwellings is proposed to be $3,321.86, a decrease of $2,147.51 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $2,081.29, an increase of $441.59. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 - 2023 to the City Council. P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018 - 2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018 - 2023. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on May 30, 2017. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,760.00, an increase of $360.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,081.00; a decrease of $678.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #3 Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board July 25, 2017 by Resolution No. 2017-12. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,842.00, representing an increase of $3,644.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,086.00, an increase of $11,700.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Page 58 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 9 of 59 According to communication from Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster of the Federal Way Public Schools, there are several factors which have driven the multiple family impact fees to increase quite significantly in this plan. One factor is the steady increase in observed multiple-family student generation rates. In 2015, the first of three multi-family developments was opened and fully occupied in the City of Federal Way. The second was opened and occupied in late 2016 and the third was opened in fully occupied in summer of 2017. The first two developments have been included in the generation rate calculation for this plan. The specific generation rates can be found on Page 29. These multiple-family complexes are generating more than one student per unit which is significantly higher than past developments within the school district. In addition to the high student generation rates, the district completed work with its Facilities Planning Committee which determined a need for additional capacity at a number of schools. As a result of this work, Phase II of the District’s plan will be placed on the November ballot for a bond request. The facilities impacted during Phase II can be found on Page 7 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Anticipated funding for this project can be found on the Six-Year Finance Plan on Page 9. The Finance Plan outlines the anticipated timeline for beginning and completion of the various projects. It is important to note that not all projects within Phase II will create additional capacity. Only costs associated with increasing needed capacity are used in the formula for calculating Impact Fees. The specific cost calculations are outlined on Page 32 of the Capital Facilities Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the Federal Way School District’s 2018 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T #4 Incorporate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on April 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $2,267.00, representing an increase of $57.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $5,235.00, an increase of $135.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 to the City Council. Page 59 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 10 of 59 P/T #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA requires the following: “A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.” A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The memo dated September 27, 2017 prepared by the City’s Finance Department contained in the working binder highlights the major changes in the CFP from last year’s CFP by projects completed (removed) and projects added. The City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 is proposed to be incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element (Volume No. 3). PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #6 Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-6 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Mixed Use”. This designation is found under the Page 60 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 11 of 59 heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2), so it is appropriately predominantly a “residential” designation. This focus is reinforced by the stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of the Comprehensive Plan, which say: “Description This category shall be applied to those areas that are either now developed or are reserved for multiple family dwellings. Densities may range from 20 to 24 units per acre. These communities are served by transit, have non-motorized connections to surrounding amenities and services, or have access to on-site nonresidential amenities and services.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed high-density residential; or 2. Properties that are connected to single-family and nonresidential designations by the Residential Transition designation or are adjacent to the Multifamily designation, and meet the development parameters of the mixed-use designation.” However, the R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & other uses) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). Table 18.07.020 Permitted Use Table – Residential Zoning Designations (Excerpt) Also, at Section ACC 18.04.625, the Code provides the following definition of “mixed use development”: “18.04.625 Mixed-use development. “Mixed-use development” means a single unified development that incorporates the planned integration of two or more different land uses consisting of some combination of office, light industrial, hotel, retail, entertainment, public uses, along with residential uses . Mixed-use development may be vertically oriented in one or more buildings, or horizontally distributed on a development site. When horizontally distributed, the different uses may be constructed concurrently and in separate phases, and should incorporate common and/or complementary Page 61 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 12 of 59 features and/or elements such as pedestrian walkways, access driveways, parking areas, architectural themes, or other techniques that provide integration between uses on the site.” The Comprehensive plan language goes on to provide that this designation would be implemented by the “Mixed Use Residential” zoning district. This zoning classification does not currently exist and there are no properties that have this zoning classification or a “Mixed Use” land use map designation; therefore elimination of the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map does not negatively affect any properties. It also does not reduce development potential since mixed use is already allowed by the zoning code. Mixed use is currently allowed in the same areas that are described as appropriate for the designation. Staff does not question the value of having portions of the city where mixed use development is allowed, but does not require a unique comprehensive plan designation to achieve. See Exhibit: “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 4 in the working binder PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment to remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan to the City Council, as presented by staff. P/T #7 Add text to add back the R-5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family Residential" Land Use Designation. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-4 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Single Family Residential”. This designation is found under the heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2). The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation provides: “Description This designation is the predominant land use category in the City. Maintaining and creating a diverse arrangement of interconnected subdivisions, neighborhoods, and communities that have a mix of densities and housing types; linkages with other residential areas and commercial hubs through non-motorized modes, such as pedestrian and bicycling, and vehicular modes will be encouraged.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed single-family residential areas; 2. Undeveloped areas that do not meet the designation criteria for other Residential, Commercial, Industrial, or Public/Quasi- Public designations; or 3. Residential Conservancy areas that contain limited critical areas, are served by public utilities (water, sewer, storm services), and meet the development parameters of the single-family designation.” Page 62 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 13 of 59 “Implementing Zoning Designations Residential 1 (1 dwelling unit per acre): All properties located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-1, as consistent with King County county-wide planning policies. Residential 7 (7 dwelling units per acre): All properties not located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-7.” The R-5 Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification is not currently identified as an implementing zoning district for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comprehensive Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected by adding the R-5, Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification as an implementing zoning district for the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. Some other minor wording corrections proposed by staff are also shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 1, in the working binder. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment to add a listing of R-5 Residential zoning district as an implementing zone of the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. P/T #8 Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". It is requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide more logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. It is requested to revert to the pre-2015 title of the category since the ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ remain similar. The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation in the latest Plan provides: “Description Residential transition areas are planned to accommodate moderate densities of varying residential dwelling types. Varying intensities within a transition area may be permitted based on adjacent density, intensity, and/or character. Appropriate densities in these areas range from 7 to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single-family dwelling to multiple-family dwellings, with larger structures allowed (within the density range) where offsetting community benefits can be identified.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed moderate density residential areas; or 2. Areas that provide a transition between single-family and multifamily, single-family and nonresidential, multifamily and nonresidential zones or development are adjacent and meet the development parameters of the Residential Transition designation.” Page 63 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 14 of 59 The reversion back to the former name provides a distinct and logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The name change also avoids confusion that would likely occur to potential users by the similarly sounding “Residential Transition Overlay” that was also part of the changes made in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. Also, the description does not provide for any different uses to serve as a ‘transition’, only intermediate residential densities. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment to change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" P/T #9 Add the "R-10, Residential" and “R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Areas of the city are zoned "R-10, Residential" but no areas are currently zoned "R-16, Residential". However, in the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation. To be corrected by adding R-10 and R-16 as implementing zones to either the "Residential Transition" or "Moderate Density" Land Use Designation. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. The title of the category is proposed to change as requested in the preceding text amendment, P/T #8. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added as implementing zoning districts. The City currently contains properties zoned R-10 Residential; however, there are no properties currently zoned R-16, Residential. The R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential are not currently identified as implementing zoning districts for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. The "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed as implementing zoning districts for the “Moderate Density Residential” land use designation. Some other minor corrections to the wording of this section as proposed by staff are shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment to add a listing of R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential zoning districts as implementing zones of the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Page 64 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 15 of 59 Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #1 Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map (This is the same as P/T #6, above). The R-10, R- 16 and R-20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Thus it was unnecessary to establish a unique land use designation to achieve a zoning district to allow. Discussion (This is the same topic as policy/text amendment P/T #6, but is repeated as a map amendment since it requires revision to both the text and map of the comprehensive plan document. See discussion and analysis under text amendment P/T #6. Also, note that a map is not provided as an Exhibit since the “Mixed Use” is not shown on any properties on the map; except in the legend because it does not apply to any properties.) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the map amendment to remove the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the Comprehensive Plan map (Map No. 1.1). CPM #2 Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. Discussion In 1996 the 0.98-acre property was part of a larger 2.23-acre property ownership by Schneider Homes Inc. that was proposed for development as the ‘Pasafino Apartments’ while in unincorporated King County prior to annexation to the City of Auburn. In 1996 a ‘Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed between the City and Schneider Homes Inc. in order for the City to provide water and sewer services to the proposed apartment development located outside the city, but within the city’s established utility service area. An ‘Amended Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed on April 21, 1997. The Agreements provided that as a condition of the City providing utility services, Schneider Homes Inc. would develop a park, and after annexation, convey the developed park land to the City of Auburn without obligation or cost. At the time of transfer, the city parks department would assume maintenance responsibility. The property was annexed to the City of Auburn effective in 2008 by Ordinance No. 6121; however, the transfer of ownership of the park land did not take place for many more years since the park land was not a separate parcel that could be deeded separately to the City. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application (File #BLA14- 0005) was filed by Schneider Homes Inc. in May of 2014 to establish the park land as a separate parcel. The processing of the BLA was delayed due to changes in property ownership interest on the part of Schneider Homes Inc. for refinancing purposes. The BLA Page 65 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 16 of 59 was subsequently approved by the City and recorded on November 2, 2016 (Recording #20161102900004) and the property subsequently conveyed to the City. It was previously appropriate to have the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of “Multiple “Family Residential" applicable to the site when it was privately-owned and part of a larger parcel that is mainly developed with apartments. However, now that Parcel No. 0921059073 is a separate parcel, owned by the City and developed for park purposes, it is appropriate for it to have an “Institutional” land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan consistent with other park properties. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the map amendment to change the mapped land use designation of 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel (Parcel No. 0921059073) from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional" (Map No 1.1). Page 66 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 17 of 59 CPM #3 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of four privately-owned, previously- developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 5401600200 (0.06 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) are owned by Ho & Nancy Kim. Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) is owned by CHS Inc. Parcel No. 5401600260 (0.24 acres) is owned by Gary & Karen Stamps. This proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use map designation to recognize and be more compatible with Page 67 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 18 of 59 developed status of the properties located at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution, and outdoor storage. Discussion This is a city-initiated comprehensive plan map amendment to change a group of four adjacent, privately-owned and mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". The purpose of this change is to recognize and be more compatible with the developed status of the properties. The characteristics of the affected parcels are as follows: Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Current Land Use 5401600175/ 232 C ST NW Ho & Nancy Kim 0.7 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former Dels Farm Supply consisting of 5,238 sq. ft. of warehouse & 1,500 sq. ft. of attached office/store. Currently unoccupied/ 5401600200/ (No address) Ho & Nancy Kim 0.06 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former railroad spur line bisecting parcel -0200 currently vacant 5401600235/ 301 2nd ST NW CHS Inc. 0.34 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Cenex bulk propane storage tanks 5401600260/ (No address) Gary & Karen Stamps 0.24 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Parking lot /vacant The sites have a “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned DUC, Downtown Urban Center. The contiguous sites are located at the northern edge of the “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation and bordered to the north and the east by properties with an industrial designation. The sites align in a row north to south and are bordered by public streets of C ST NW to the west; 3rd ST NW to the north and by the Burlington Northern railroad to the east. The automobile body shop of A-1 Collision borders the sites to the south. The two largest parcels, Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) have been developed for more than 25 years with structures and facilities that are more appropriate characterized as “industrial uses” than suburban downtown development. The configuration and location of the properties sandwiched between transportation corridors makes them less suitable for redevelopment as downtown service or retail type uses geared to leisure shopping. Also, due to the number of zoning inquiries, the City staff has increasing become aware of the difficulty of the property owner in finding tenants that can occupy the former farm supply building and meet the zoning use regulations of the DUC zoning district. Also, few uses are capable of using the building with limited physical alterations in order to avoid triggering consistency with Downtown Design Standards and significant upgrades. Page 68 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 19 of 59 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the map amendment to change a group of four privately-owned, mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 5401600175, 5401600200, 5401600235, and 5401600260) Page 69 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 20 of 59 ------------------NOVEMBER 1, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING----------------- Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #4 Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately-owned, developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Discussion The 2.15-acre property was previously a smaller parcel and the comprehensive plan designation boundary followed this original property boundary. In 2004, a boundary line adjustment application was filed (File No. LLA04-0010), approved by the City, and recorded (Recording No. 20040712003209). The boundary line adjustment expanded the parcel boundary to include additional area to the south. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation boundary was not simultaneously changed to correspond to the property boundary change. In the intervening time, the fence contractor business has using the expansion area as part of their yard. It is appropriate to make the change to avoid split designation of a parcel where warranted by existing development pattern and setting. The “Residential Transition” designation makes up a smaller portion of the lot, while the balance is used by a fencing contractor. As shown on the map below, the designation change is consistent with adjacent property located to the west. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #4 to change the mapped land use designation of the southern part of a 2.15-acre, privately-owned, parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial" (Parcel No. 8695200020). Page 70 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 21 of 59 CPM #5 Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately-owned and 1 city- owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned parcels, Nos. 7815700095 (0.17 acres – vacant) and 7815700135 (0.33 acres – parking lot) are owned by Levan Auburn Development LLC and the City-owned Parcel No. 7815700085 (0.19 acres - Plaza park). These contiguous properties are located at the SW corner of W Page 71 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 22 of 59 Main ST and Division ST. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. It is requested to revert to former designation of "Downtown Urban Center". These 3 mostly undeveloped parcels are currently zoned “DUC, Downtown Urban Center”. Due to their location in the heart of the city center and economic development potential, these parcels should have the designation "Downtown Urban Center". Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 7815700095 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.17 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Vacant lot 7815700135 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.33 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Parking lot 7815700085 City of Auburn 0.19 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” City’s Plaza Park Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #5 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. (Parcel Nos. 7815700095, 7815700135, & 7815700085) Page 72 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 23 of 59 CPM #6 Change the mapped land use designation (and zoning district) of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 46 parcels 46 city- owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Page 73 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 24 of 59 Parcel Nos. 0821059017, 7345300160, 6347000055, 6347000065, 0001000081, 1313500310, 3021059044, 3021059080, 3021059089, 1421049011, 1821059117, 0520061060, 0721059038, 7749501070, 0521059010, 0521059029, 0421059062, 0421059061, 0421059060, 0421059071, 0421059004, 3845000080, 7299602140, 4137070990, 7002181950, 0520051035, 0520051006, 0921059018, 6655000105, 6655000021, 1421049067, 9262800330, 9262800341, 1421049017, 9262800285, 0721059020, 8669150810, 6655000024, 6655000030, 3021059325, 3121059017, 3021059375, 8581400530, 1821059327, 0821059017, & 0621059007 are scattered at various sites. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are city–owned developed parks and contain play areas and active recreational space. And the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. cemeteries and active and mainly developed parks should not be designated "Open Space"). Also, for most parcels the zoning map classification also needs to change from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #6 to change the mapped land use designation of multiple City-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17- 0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117, & 8581400530 which are already zoned: “I, Institutional”. Page 74 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 25 of 59 Page 75 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 26 of 59 Page 76 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 27 of 59 Page 77 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 28 of 59 Page 78 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 29 of 59 Page 79 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 30 of 59 Page 80 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 31 of 59 CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Parcel No. 2021059041 (1.45 acres US Government)), 2021059047 (24.46 acres, Tribe), & 2021059037 (0.07 acres, Tribe) are proposed for change. With adoption of the 2015 Page 81 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 32 of 59 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are Muckleshoot Tribal owned properties that are developed as cemeteries. In addition, the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g., cemeteries or parks developed for active recreation should not be designated "Open Space"). Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2021059041 US Government 1.45 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Historic Tribal cemetery 2021059047 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 24.46 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Tribal Cemetery 2021059037 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 0.07 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Street frontage portion of historic Tribal cemetery Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #7 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17- 0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification (Parcel Nos. 2021059041, 2021059047, & 2021059037). Page 82 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 33 of 59 CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Parcels Nos. are 3121059069, 1.79 acres owned by Alan Clayton and Parcel No. 3121059027, 3.67 acres, owned by John Nixon. Both are located on east side of A ST SE, approx. 600 feet south of Lakeland Hills Page 83 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 34 of 59 WY SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. It is requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Both properties were annexed to the City of Auburn from the City of Pacific in the year 2003 by City of Auburn Ordinance No. 3643. Prior to the annexation, the northern parcel (owned by Mr. Clayton) was zoned “C, Commercial” and the southern parcel (now owned by John Nixon) was zoned “RMH, Multiple Family Residential” in the City of Pacific. Mr. Clayton’s zoning designation of “C, Commercial” was a result of an application for zone change requested by Mr. Clayton and approved by the City of Pacific in Aug ust of 1992 by Ordinance No. 1177 (The rezone was to the zoning classification of “BC, Business Commercial” which subsequently became “C, Commercial”.) At annexation to the City of Auburn, the property assumed an “R-5, Residential” zoning designation by default, while the comprehensive plan designation was made “Light Commercial”. Of late, Mr. Clayton has been contacting the City almost annually requesting that the city initiate a change in the zoning designation back to a commercial category. He has always had the ability to submit a private application to initiate the zoning map change himself, and has been advised of this, but was reluctant. The ‘working binder’ under the ‘Map Amendments’ tab and CPM #8, contains a letter from Mr. Clayton dated July 18, 2017 and supporting information in which he describes the history and his request to have the zoning changed. The southern parcel prior to 2015 had a comprehensive plan designation of “Light Commercial” and was previously was zoned “R-5, Residential”. These 2 parcels are the only parcels on the east side of A ST SE, in the vicinity that have a Comprehensive Plan designation of “Single Family Residential”. The adjacent properties to the south were changed to “light Industrial” due to private com plan application last year. The properties to the north have a comprehensive plan designation of “Institutional”. While the comprehensive plan designation was changed in 2015 to “Single Family Residential”, to align with the property’s R-5 Residential zoning, it is the zoning classification that should have been changed. The City now seeks to rectify the circumstances by changing the both the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for both parcels Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 3121059069 (northern) Alan B Clayton 1.79 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential vacant 3121059027/ 5340 A ST SE (southern) John Nixon 3.67 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential Single family residence Page 84 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 35 of 59 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #8 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0004) to correspond to the “C1, Commercial” implementing zoning classification. Parcels Nos. are 3121059069 and Parcel No. 3121059027 Page 85 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 36 of 59 CPM #9 Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". The 1.75 -acre Parcel No. 0921059042 owned by Highlane Prop. LLP and 0.81-acre parcel No. 0921059113 owned by Jennifer & James Hunt both are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of 2015 plan and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 0921059042 Highlane Prop. LLP 1.75 -acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant 0921059113 Jennifer & Eric Hunt 0.81-acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #9 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". (Parcels Nos. are 0921059042 and 0921059113). Page 86 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 37 of 59 CPM #10 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel near the intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately owned 0.91-acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". The Parcel No. 0921059101 is owned by Ram Singh Dhaliwal is located 130 Page 87 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 38 of 59 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL (Address is 30811 124th AVE SE). The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of map amendment CPM #10 to change the land use designation of a 0.91-acre parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential" (Parcel No. 0921059101). Page 88 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 39 of 59 CPM #11 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84-acre parcel addressed as 521 - 8TH ST SW. from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a single 286,000 square foot multiple tenant warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 1321049019 is owned by Western B NW WA LLC and located south of State Route 18 (SR) at the west end of 8th ST SW (Address is 521 8TH ST SW.) The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #11 to change the land use designation of an approximately 13.84-acre parcel from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 1321049019). Page 89 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 40 of 59 CPM #12 Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private parcel located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel No. 5530200000, owned by Lois Maathuis, is located Page 90 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 41 of 59 NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. The site is developed as a series of 13 multiple-family, 2-story buildings containing a total of 102 dwelling units, known as the ‘Mill Pond at Lakeland Condominiums’. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #12 to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private parcel developed with condominiums from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". (Parcel No. 5530200000). Page 91 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 42 of 59 CPM #13 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 adjacent parcels located north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" and with “Residential Transition Overlay” to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, Page 92 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 43 of 59 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197 are owned by various property owners & located on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2721059053 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.22 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059063 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.06 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Access Tract 2721059066 Orrozco, Salvador and Val 0.23 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059126 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.52 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059156 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.39 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059157 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.36 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059162 Huang, Angelina and Yao 0.63 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059168 Bunkhan, Chakkaphan and Suphawan 0.19 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059179 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.42 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Triplex 2721059197 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.23 “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #13 to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197). Page 93 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 44 of 59 CPM #14 Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels located at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Some are City- owned; others are privately owned. Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, Page 94 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 45 of 59 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Downtown Urban Center". The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #14 to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center" (Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040). Page 95 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 46 of 59 CPM #15 Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills community from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Page 96 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 47 of 59 Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. The location of the parcels within the Lakeland special planning area is shown on the map. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #15 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. Page 97 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 48 of 59 CPM #16 Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility on the south side of 35th St SE, from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with designation applicable to the balance of the plat. Parcel No. 1877100170 is owned by Page 98 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 49 of 59 the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. The lot for the stormwater facility was created from the "D ST SE Plat" and should retain the same comprehensive plan designation as the balance of the plat. It is not the intention of the Comprehensive Plan designation to apply a separate classification to each special purpose lot or tract needed to support the overall subdivision. Land use designations should apply to broad geographic areas based on compatibility and generally not on an individual parcel basis. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #16 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel No. 1877100170). Page 99 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 50 of 59 CPM #17 Change the mapped land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately- owned parcel located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel No. 1921059271 owned by Mayfield TNC LLC is located east of end of B Page 100 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 51 of 59 ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. According to KC Assessor records, the property is developed with two, 2-story buildings as the "Mayfield Apartments" containing 31 dwelling units. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #17 to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family" (Parcel No. 1921059271). Page 101 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 52 of 59 Private-Initiated Map Amendment (File # CPA17-0002) and Rezone (File #REZ17-0001) Nexus Youth and Families (Please refer to the last section in the working binder for the exhibits referenced for the Nexus Youth & Families applications.) 1. The Applicant, Sylvia Fuerstenberg, representing Nexus Youth & Families (“Nexus”), submitted a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (City File No. CPA17-0002) and Rezone request (REZ17- 0001) applications on June 8, 2017, before the year 2017 application deadline for Comprehensive Plan amendments (June 9, 2017). Page 102 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 53 of 59 2. The Comprehensive Plan amendment seeks to change the designation of three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. The three parcels total approximately 0.72 acres. See Exhibit 10. 3. Similarly, the Rezone (zoning map amendment) seeks to change the classification of the same three parcels from “R-7, Residential Seven Dwelling Units per Acre” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. See Exhibit 11. 4. As indicated by the Applicant’s narratives (See Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13), the requested changes are to accommodate future expansion of the Nexus Youth & Families Campus. Nexus Youth & Families (formerly Auburn Youth Resources (AYR)) is a non-profit organization that provides mental health counseling for youth, groups and families through chemical dependency prevention, treatment and aftercare and homeless services of emergency shelter, intercept homeless youth through a street outreach program and provide supportive housing across South King County. The facilities at this location include a clinic, 2 administrative buildings, 2 youth shelters, storage buildings, and the Arcadia House which will be under construction soon (Arcadia House is a replacement building for an existing supportive house, which will be demolished). See Exhibit 14 for reference. 5. At its ultimate buildout, the Nexus Campus will intend to serve homeless youth and single mothers through provision of permanent supportive housing, clinic services, and case management and support services. Nexus has also requested in the Rezone request for a new use to be added to the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district that fully encompasses their proposed uses; this text amendment will be subsequently considered under a separate application and presented to Planning Commission after review of the 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been completed. 6. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation, zoning classification, and current land uses of the subject properties and surrounding properties are as follows: Comp Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential 3 single-family homes; 2 are currently used as shelters by Nexus, the other is used as a residence by the Bartholomews North “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential Single-family homes South “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Clinic East “Institutional” I, Institutional Les Gove Community Campus West “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Admin. 7. The three parcels front onto ‘H’ St. SE, which is classified as a ‘Local Residential’ street; ‘H’ St. SE is then connected to Auburn Way S (‘Principal Arterial’ classified street) via 9th St. SE (‘Local Residential’) and the unnamed alley on the north side of the project site. Part of the western portion of the alley will be widened to 20 ft. to support emergency services in conjunction with the Arcadia House construction (the alley is currently approximately 12 ft. wide). The remainder of the alley will be widened with subsequent / future development of the Nexus Campus. Circulation plans for eventual Page 103 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 54 of 59 buildout would be to direct a majority of the traffic either directly onto Auburn Way S o r via the alley to Auburn Way S. See the Conceptual Campus Site Plan, Exhibit 14. 8. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties have had similar single-family zoning designations since at least 1964 (note these parcels were annexed into the City in 1948). The Comprehensive Plan designation has also been single -family since at least 1960. Page 104 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 55 of 59 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The City code provides that applicant requesting a comprehensive plan amendment must demonstrate that the request complies with the following decision criteria: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region.” These criteria are repeated in bold below, followed by a Staff Analysis indicated in italics. The Applicant’s responses to these criteria are included as Exhibit 12. Criterion #1 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(1): The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. Staff Analysis: The Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element, Page LU-9) provides the following explanation for the “Light Commercial” Land Use Designation: “Light Commercial Description This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner, which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. Such areas should enc ourage walkability, leisure shopping, engaging public space, and should provide other amenities conducive to attracting shoppers. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed light commercial areas buffered from more intense commercial or industrial designations by landscaping or environmental features; or 2. Located along arterial or collector streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Commercial designation. Page 105 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 56 of 59 Implementing Zoning Designations Light Commercial Policies Policy LU-60. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and community-serving retail trade, offices, personal services, eating establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Policy LU-61. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-62. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. Policy LU-63. Multiple family dwellings are only allowed as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as within the upper stories of buildings. Policy LU-64. Drive in windows should only be allowed accessory to a permitted use, and only when carefully sited under the administrative use process, in order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not compromised. Policy LU-65. Large scale regional retail uses and uses which rely on direct access by veh icles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Policy LU-66. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Policy LU-67. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Policy LU-68. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for the development associated with the request.” Per ACC 18.23.030(C), the intent of the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district is: “…intended for lower intensity commercial adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This zone generally serves as a transition zone between higher and lower intensity land uses, providing retail and professional services. This zone represents the primary commercial designation for small- to moderate-scale commercial activities compatible by having similar performance standards and should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attr acts pedestrian- oriented activities. This zone encourages leisure shopping and provides amenities conducive to attracting shoppers and pedestrians.” As identified in the C-1 intent statement above, this zoning district allows provisions for retail uses as well as professional services. Nexus does not engage in any retail or commercial uses, however, does provide professional services such as counseling for homeless youth and single mothers. Nexus has also applied for a zoning text amendment to include their specific unique set of uses and facility as an allowed use in the C-1 zoning district (to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a future date). Page 106 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 57 of 59 With the described emphasis on commercial uses, an argument could be made that the C-1 zone may not be the most suitable location for this type of facility, However, an argument could also be made that this is a suitable use for this location; 1) with the exception of the Bartholomew parcel, the other 2 parcels as well as two located to the west are already owned and operated by Nexus as similar uses (although to a much-lesser scale), 2) the campus fronts-on and has direct access to Auburn Way S, a principal arterial, 3) there is an existing Metro transit stop in front of the campus that can serve the population, 4) the campus has an intervening alley right-of-way to the north, providing a delineated separation to the existing single-family homes, and 5) there are existing public services and facilities located in close proximity to the campus, including the library, community center, and Nexus’ other service (e.g. clinic) that the homeless occupants can utilize. Other applicable policies from the City’s Comprehensive Plan that support the Nexus applicat ion are as follows: From the ‘Core Plan’: Policy 11. Participate in and support efforts to provide solutions for persons experiencing homelessness. Policy LU-30. Encourage development of permanent supportive housing to address the homeless population and those with special needs. Policy H-10. Provide a land use plan and zoning that offers opportunities to achieve a variety of housing styles and densities for private and non-profit housing providers. Policy H-31. Encourage and support human and health service organizations that offer programs and facilities for people with special needs. Support programs in particular that help people to remain within the community, including those that are veterans, disabled, seniors, single parent households, and the homeless. Policy H-43. Work with other jurisdictions and health and social service organizations to implement a coordinated, regional approach to homelessness. Policy H-47. Support nonprofit organizations during all stages of siting and project planning and when applying for county, state, and federal funding. Criterion #2 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(2): Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased. Staff Analysis: The proposed application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation has been reviewed by the City’s Utilities division, Traffic division, and the Valley Regional Fire Authority. Based on these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. As is typical with development in the City, adequate infrastructure improvements will be required to be provided concurrent with future development. Although the specific construction activity for the three subject parcels is still in the master planning stages and thus not exactly known, future development is not anticipated to be detrimental to public services. Traffic impacts will be reviewed once the campus planning by the applicant has been finalized to ensure accurate mitigation measures are provided (through Applicant preparation and City review of a Traffic Impact Analysis). Criterion #3 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(3): Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff Analysis: While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the Applicant’s request to change three parcels from residential to commercial designations are consistent with the Page 107 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 58 of 59 designations and uses in the immediate vicinity. The subject parcels are bordered by other parcels owned by Nexus that are part of the campus and campus is bordered on three sides by public rights- of-way and to the south is a City-owned parking lot (west of the Library). The requested change is a logical expansion of the Light Commercial land use designation for this particular use. Criterion #4 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(4): A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff Analysis: A change is proposed for three parcels to Light Commercial which is consistent with the adjacent parcels to the south and west, all of which are also owned by Nexus. A change in conditions or circumstances would be the increasing number of homeless persons. Nexus seeks to assist the community and help vulnerable homeless populations of the youth/young adults and single mothers. Also, as stated under Criterion #1, above, the Comprehensive Plan lists numerous goals/policies to respond to homelessness. Criterion #5 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(5): If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region. Staff Analysis: The change, if approved, would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), the King County Countywide Planning Policies and Puget Sound Regional Council’s Vision 2040. The proposal is consistent because it furthers provision of services and housing for the homeless population. Criterion #6 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(6): If the request is to change the land use designation of a specific property on the comprehensive plan land use map, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff Analysis: The requested change is consistent with Item b in that the adjacent properties to the west and south also have the comprehensive plan designation of “Light Commercial”. REZONE (Zoning Map Amendment) RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: Chapter 18.68 ACC ((Zoning Code) Amendments) specifies the intent and process for zoning code amendments; in this case, a site-specific zoning map amendment has been requested. While the City Code does not contain any rezone criteria; case law offers some criteria (“A Little Bit Pregnant: The Multi- Personalities of Site Specific Rezones - Or - A Cheat Sheet for Everything You Need to Know about Site- Specific Rezones”, by Phil Olbrechts on MSRC.org, April 1, 2013) as follows: “…require that the proponents of a rezone must establish that conditions have substantially changed since the original adoption and that the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. If a rezone implements the comprehensive plan, a showing that a change of circumstances has occurred is not required.” With the change in City procedures by Ordinance No. 6655 to allow concurrent recommendations by the Planning Commission on both the Comprehensive plan and zoning map changes, the recommendations Page 108 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, CPA17-0002, REZ17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 - 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments & Assoc. Rezones Date: November 28, 2017 Page 59 of 59 on each should be consistent and therefore the rezone will implement the comprehensive plan designation, making it unnecessary to demonstrate that a change in circumstances has occurred. Related to the other criteria, the requested rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, and welfare. Adequate public facilities such as water and sewer services are capable of being provided for the parcels at future development and would therefore not be detrimental to public health. The rezone itself is not anticipated to allow uses that would pose any detrimental effects on the morals or welfare of the public; the uses planned by Nexus as a redeveloped campus generally are beneficial to the community by serving a vulnerable population. As for impacts to public safety, the proposed Nexus facilities could be seen to have either favorable or unfavorable impacts. Providing services for homeless youth could attract this special population to the neighborhood that may not already be present, however, the services are also intended to assist by providing shelter and integration into productive society. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval of the Nexus Youth & Families request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment for three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. EXHIBIT LIST: (Please see the last divider in the ‘working binder’ for these exhibits.) Exhibit 1. CPA17-0002 and REZ17-0001 Staff Report Exhibit 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Exhibit 3. Rezone Application Exhibit 4. Vicinity Map Exhibit 5. Ownership Map Exhibit 6. Chapter 14.22 ACC Exhibit 7. Chapter 18.68 ACC Exhibit 8. SEPA Comment Letter Exhibit 9. Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter, received August 22, 2017 Exhibit 10. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Maps Page 109 of 436 ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 6 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON ADOPTING 2017 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A AND ADOPTING CORRESPONDING REZONES RELATED TO CERTAIN OF THE MAP AMENDMENTS AND CREATING A NEW SECTION 18.01.050 TO THE CITY CODE, RELATING TO PLANNING WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which ineludes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn Gity Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, in April 2017 the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 9, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received one private-initiated map amendment for the year 2017 annual amendments; (Nexus Youth & Families, File No. CPA17- 0002); and Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 1 Page 110 of 436 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated seventeen map amendments (CPA17- 0001) and nine policy/text amendments (File No. CPA17-0001); and WHEREAS, a few of the map amendments change the existing Comprehensive Plan land use map designation and zoning classification of properties which are owned by or controlled on behalf of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and it has been the City's consistent practice to have designations in place even if they are unused; and WHEREAS, in June 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 allowing the Planning Commission and City Council to consider zoning map changes associated with comprehensive map changes (for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently, thereby eliminating the need for a subsequent hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner on the rezone (zoning map amendment) as under the previous regulations; and WHEREAS, three of the City-initiated map amendments (CPA17-0001, REZ17- 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004) and the one private initiated map amendment CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001) have an associated rezone (zoning map amendment) to maintain consistency wifh the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments and map amendments were processed by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2017 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, maintaining a eurrent Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36:70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP17-0014 (city-initiated Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 2 Page 111 of 436 amendments) & SEP17-0012 (Nexus Youth & Families, private-initiated amendment)) and were determined to have no environmental significance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RGW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 18, 2017 and on November 1, 2017, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearings the Auburn City Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendafions to the Gity Council on the proposed Year 2017 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments and for certain amendments, on the associated rezone; and WHEREAS, on November 27, 2017, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2017, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 3 Page 112 of 436 Section 1. Application CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesfing a land use designation change from Single Family Residential" with a "Residential Transition Overlay" to "Light Commercial"; and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from "R-7, Residential" to "C-1, Light Commercial" for three p.arcels totaling 0.72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's November 1, 2017 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the October 24, 2017 (private-initiated) staff report, both attached as Exhibit "B". Section 2. The 2017 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map Amendments CPA17-0001) and associated rezones (REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004) are adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "C" as attached hereto and incorporated herei_n by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "C" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Section 3. The 2017 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA17-0001), as set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are adopted and approved. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "D" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shaU be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts the Planning Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 4 Page 113 of 436 Commission's action taken on November 1, 2017 recommending appproval, and Council further adopts the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the October 3, 2017 Group #1) and October 19, 2017 (Group #2), staff reports, attached per Exhibit "C". Section 4. The 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703; and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995; and adopted December 14, 2015 by Ordinance No. 6584. Section 5. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21 C.060. Section 6. New Section to City Gode. That a new Section 18.01.050 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as follows: 18.01.050 How do city zoning and land use regulations relate to Indian Lands? The City of Auburn recognizes and acknowledges that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has jurisdiction and land use control over Indian Lands. The designation of city zoning and land use regulations that might appear to affect any Indian Lands does not, and is not intended to, usurp or exercise land use control over such lands. Any such city regulations are intended to identify what zoning or land-use provisions would apply to such lands were they not under Indian jurisdiction, or were the land to change in ownership or jurisdictional character. Until those circumstances change for such lands, the city regulations shall be for informational purposes only. Section 7. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 5 Page 114 of 436 amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", Exhibit "D", and Exhibit "E" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 8. The City of Auburn recognizes and acknowledges that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has jurisdiction and land use control over Indian Lands. The designation of city zoning and land use regulations that might appear to affect any Indian L.ands does not, and is not intended to, usurp or exercise land use control over such lands. Any such city regulations are intended to identify what zoning or land-use provisions would apply to such lands were they not under Indian jurisdiction, or were the land. to change in ownership or jurisdictional character. Section 9. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumsfance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinanee, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: CITY OF AUBURN iVancy Backus, MAYOR Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 6 Page 115 of 436 ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: iel B. =eid; City Attorney Published: Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Fage 7 Page 116 of 436 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 8 Exhibit "A" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; for three parcels totaling 0.72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105- 9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 for Nexus Youth & Families. (CPA17-0002) Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Zoning Map showing a change from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial” for three parcels totaling 0.72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 for Nexus Youth & Families. (REZ17-0001) (Please see “Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA17-0002” tab - Attachment 1). Page 117 of 436 10TH PL SE FSTSEH ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4881Printed On: 08/20/13 2017 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map 0 40 80 120 160 200 FEETFSTSE10TH PL SE H ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Heavy Commercial Institutional Light Commercial Residential Transition Residential Transition Overlay Single Family Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Auburn City Limits Parcels EXISTING PROPOSED Attachment 1 Page 118 of 436 FSTSE10TH PL SE H ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4882Printed On: 08/20/13 2017 Proposed Zoning Plan Amendment Map 0 40 80 120 160 200 FEET 10TH PL SE FSTSEH ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS C3 Heavy Commercial District I Institutional Use District C1 Light Commercial District R7 Reside ntial 7 DU/Acre Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Auburn City Limits Parcels EX ISTIN G PROPOSED Page 119 of 436 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 9 Exhibit "B" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 24, 2017 - Attachment 2. CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, land use designation change from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial” for three parcels totaling 0.72 acres, for Nexus Youth & Families. Page 120 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works, Planning Services Attachments: (See exhibit listing at the end of this report) Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing and recommend to City Council approval of the Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone (zoning map amendment) request. Background Information: APPLICANT: Sylvia Fuerstenberg PROPERTY OWNERS: Nexus Youth & Families Nexus Youth & Families (Parcels 192105-9142, 9145) 1000 Auburn Way South Jay & Daniel Bartholomew Auburn, WA 98002 (Parcel 192105-9077) REQUEST: File Nos. CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation of three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and the zoning (zoning map amendment) from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. Two of the three parcels are owned by Nexus Youth & Families (“Nexus”), the other is owned by Jay & Daniel Bartholomew. LOCATION: The proposal consists of three adjacent parcels located between Auburn Way S. and ‘H’ St. SE, approximately 120 ft. south of 9th St. SE. King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077. The addresses for the three parcels are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. See “Vicinity Map”, Exhibit 3, and “Ownership Map”, Exhibit 4. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Airport Finance Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Human Services Planning & CD Park Board Public Works Planning Comm. Other Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Building M&O Cemetery Mayor Finance Parks Fire Planning Legal Police Public Works Human Resources Information Services Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to Until ___/___/____ Tabled Until _ _/___/__ _ Councilmember: Staff: Meeting Date: Item Number: Attachment 2 Page 121 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 2 of 10 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Applicant, Sylvia Fuerstenberg, representing Nexus Youth & Families (“Nexus”), submitted a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (City File No. CPA17-0002) and Rezone request (REZ17- 0001) applications on June 8, 2017, before the year 2017 application deadline for Comprehensive Plan amendments (June 9, 2017). 2. The City of Auburn first adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended, in 1995. The Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually each year since, generally for housekeeping items and for coordination with the Capital Facilities Plan. 3. The City of Auburn adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the GMA under Ordinance No. 6584 on December 15, 2015. 4. RCW 36.70A.130 (GMA) provides for annual amendments to locally adopted comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances, these amendments shall be considered by the City’s Legislative body no more frequently than once per year. The annual limitation and exceptions are also restated under ACC 14.22.060. Comprehensive Plan Related Findings 5. In June 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 which allows the Planning Commission and City Council to consider associated map changes (for Comp. Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently. This eliminates the need for the Hearing Examiner to subsequently consider a zoning map amendment public hearing when it is related to a Comprehensive Plan map amendment. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated comprehensive plan amendments and the general processing as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a Page 122 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 3 of 10 recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city cou ncil. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. Per Chapter 14.22 Auburn City Code (“ACC”), privately-initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall have at least one public hearing before the Planning Commission who then forward on a recommendation to the City Council. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. Chapter 14.22 ACC ‘Comprehensive Plan’ is attached as Exhibit 6 for reference. 8. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house on the docket of comprehensive plan amendments as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. Zoning Code Related Findings 9. Chapter 18.68 ACC (Zoning) Amendments)) outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated zoning amendments and the general processing. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b), when the Planning Commission is considering a rezone (zoning map amendment) which requires a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, the public hearings shall be conducted concurrently and a recommendation on both shall be forwarded to the City Council. Chapter 18.68 ACC ‘Amendments’ is attached as Exhibit 7 for reference 10. Pursuant to Chapter 197-11 WAC and Chapter 16.06 ACC, this project is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (“SEPA”) environmental review. A Determination of Non-Significance (“DNS”), for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezone request was issued under City File No. SEP17-0012 on August 24, 2017; with the comment period ending September 8, 2017 and an appeal period ending September 22, 2017. One public comment was submitted (See Exhibit 8); no appeal was filed. 11. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Dept. of Commerce and other State agencies as required for the 60-day State review. See Exhibit 9. No comments have been received from the Dept. of Commerce or other State agencies as of the date of this report. 12. The public hearing notice was published on October 17, 2017 in the Seattle Times, at least 10 days prior to this November 1, 2017 Planning Commission public hearing. Public notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet and those requesting said notice, posting on the City’s website, and posting on the subject properties. 13. The following Staff Report and recommendation describes and addresses the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment and Rezone request by Nexus. Page 123 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 4 of 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE REQUEST – STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment seeks to change the designation of three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. The three parcels total approximately 0.72 acres. See Exhibit 10 and the following vicinity map: 2. Similarly, the Rezone request seeks to change the classification of the same three parcels from “R-7, Residential Seven Dwelling Units per Acre” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. See Exhibit 11. 3. As indicated by the Applicant’s narratives (See Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13), the requested changes are to accommodate future expansion of the Nexus Youth & Families Campus. Nexus Youth & Families (formerly Auburn Youth Resources (AYR)) is a non-profit organization that provides mental health counseling for youth, groups and families through chemical dependency prevention, treatment and aftercare and homeless services of emergency shelter, intercept homeless youth through a street outreach program and provide supportive housing across South King County. The facilities at this location include a clinic, 2 administrative buildings, 2 youth shelters, storage buildings, and the Arcadia House which will be under construction soon (Arcadia House is a replacement building for an existing supportive house, which will be demolished). See Exhibit 14 for reference. Page 124 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 5 of 10 4. At its ultimate buildout the Nexus Campus will intend to serve homeless youth and single mothers through provision of permanent supportive housing, clinic services, and case management and support services. Nexus has also requested in the Rezone request for a new use to be added to the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district that fully encompasses their proposed uses; this tex t amendment will be subsequently considered under a separate application and presented to Planning Commission after review of the 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been completed. 5. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation, zoning classification, and current land uses of the subject properties and surrounding properties are as follows: Comp Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential 3 single-family homes; 2 are currently used as shelters by Nexus, the other is used as a residence by the Bartholomews North “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential Single-family homes South “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Clinic East “Institutional” I, Institutional Les Gove Community Campus West “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Admin. 6. The three parcels front onto ‘H’ St. SE, which is classified as a ‘Local Residential’ street; ‘H’ St. SE is then connected to Auburn Way S (‘Principal Arterial’ classified street) via 9th St. SE (‘Local Residential’) and the unnamed alley on the north side of the project site. Part of the western portion of the alley will be widened to 20 ft. to support emergency services in conjunction with the Arcadia House construction (the alley is currently approximately 12 ft. wide). The remainder of the alley will be widened with subsequent / future development of the Nexus Campus. Circulation plans for eventual buildout would be to direct a majority of the traffic either directly onto Auburn Way S or via the alley to Auburn Way S. See the Conceptual Campus Site Plan, Exhibit 14. 7. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties have had similar single-family zoning designations since at least 1964 (note these parcels were annexed into the City in 1948). The Comprehensive Plan designation has also been single-family since at least 1960. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to provide a policy basis for potential future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent, as required by the following City Code provision: “14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan.” The City Code provides certain criteria for decisions on amending the Comprehensive Plan under ACC 18.14.22.110. These criteria are listed below, followed by a Staff Analysis in italics. The Applicant’s responses to these criteria are included in Exhibit 12. Page 125 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 6 of 10 1. Criterion #1 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(1): The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent . Staff Analysis: The Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element, Page LU-9) provides the following explanation for the “Light Commercial” Land Use Designation: “Light Commercial Description This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. Such areas should encourage walkability, leisure shopping, engaging public space, and should provide other amenities conducive to attracting shoppers. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed light commercial areas buffered from more intense commercial or industrial designations by landscaping or environmental features; or 2. Located along arterial or collector streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Light Commercial Policies Policy LU-60. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and community-serving retail trade, offices, personal services, eating establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Policy LU-61. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-62. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. Policy LU-63. Multiple family dwellings are only allowed as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as within the upper stories of buildings. Policy LU-64. Drive in windows should only be allowed accessory to a permitted use, and only when carefully sited under the administrative use process, in order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not compromised. Policy LU-65. Large scale regional retail uses and uses which rely on direct access by veh icles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Policy LU-66. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Policy LU-67. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Page 126 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 7 of 10 Policy LU-68. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for the development associated with the request.” Per ACC 18.23.030(C), the intent of the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district is: “…intended for lower intensity commercial adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This zone generally serves as a transition zone between higher and lower intensity land uses, providing retail and professional services. This zone represents the primary commercial designation for small- to moderate-scale commercial activities compatible by having similar performance standards and should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attr acts pedestrian- oriented activities. This zone encourages leisure shopping and provides amenities conducive to attracting shoppers and pedestrians.” As identified in the C-1 intent statement above, this zoning district allows provisions for retail uses as well as professional services. Nexus does not engage in any retail or commercial uses, however, does provide professional services for homeless youth and single mothers. Nexus has also applied for a zoning text amendment to include their specific type of facility as an allowable use in the C-1 zoning district (to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a future date). Although an argument could be made that the C-1 zone may not be the most suitable location for this type of facility, looking at certain facts an argument could also be made that this is a suitable use for this location; 1) with the exception of the Bartholomew parcel, the other four parcels within the Nexus campus are already owned and operated by Nexus as similar uses (although to a much-lesser scale), 2) the campus fronts-on and has direct access to Auburn Way S, a principal arterial , 3) there is an existing Metro transit stop in front of the Arcadia House, 4) the campus has an intervening alley right- of-way to the north, providing a delineated buffer to the existing single-family homes, and 5) there are existing public services and facilities located in close proximity to the campus, including the library, community center, and Nexus’ other service (e.g. clinic) that the homeless occupants could utilize. Other applicable policies from the City’s Comprehensive Plan that support the Nexus application are as follows: From the ‘Core Plan’: Policy 11. Participate in and support efforts to provide solutions for persons experiencing homelessness. Policy LU-30. Encourage development of permanent supportive housing to address the homeless population and those with special needs. Policy H-10. Provide a land use plan and zoning that offers opportunities to achieve a variety of housing styles and densities for private and non-profit housing providers. Policy H-31. Encourage and support human and health service organizations that offer programs and facilities for people with special needs. Support programs in particular that help people to remain within the community, including those that are veterans, disabled, seniors, single parent households, and the homeless. Policy H-43. Work with other jurisdictions and health and social service organizations to implement a coordinated, regional approach to homelessness. Policy H-47. Support nonprofit organizations during all stages of siting and project planning and when applying for county, state, and federal funding. Page 127 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 8 of 10 2. Criterion #2 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(2): Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased. Staff Analysis: The proposed application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation has been reviewed by the City’s Utilities, Traffic division, and the Valley Regional Fire Authority. Based on these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. As is typical with development in the City, adequate infrastructure improvements will be required to be provided concurrent with future development. Although no specific construction activity is proposed or permitted with this amendment, eventual buildout of these three parcels in relation to the overall Nexus Campus is not anticipated to be detrimental to public services. Traffic impacts will be reviewed once the campus planning by the applicant has been finalized to ensure accurate mitigation measures are provided (through Applicant preparation and City review of a Traffic Impact Analysis). 3. Criterion #3 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(3): Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff Analysis: While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the Applicant’s request to change three parcels from residential to commercial designations are not out of character with the designations or uses in the immediate vicinity. The Nexus Campus is bordered on three sides by public rights-of-way and to the south is a City-owned parking lot. The requested change is a logical expansion of the Light Commercial land use for this particular use. 4. Criterion #4 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(4): A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff Analysis: The proposed change is for three parcels to Light Commercial which is consistent with the adjacent parcels to the south and west, all of which are also owned by Nex us. A change in conditions or circumstances would be the ever-increasing number of homeless people. Nexus seeks to help with the especially vulnerable homeless populations, the youth/young adults and single mothers. Also, as stated under Criterion #1, above, the Comprehensive Plan lists numerous goals/policies to address homelessness. 5. Criterion #5 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(5): If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region. Staff Analysis: The change, if approved, would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), the King County Countywide Planning Policies and Vision 2040. The proposal is consistent because it furthers provision of services and housing for the homeless population. 6. Criterion #6 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(6): If the request is to change the land use designation of a specific property on the comprehensive plan land use map, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff Analysis: The requested change is consistent with item b in that the adjacent properties to the west and south are designated Light Commercial. Page 128 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 9 of 10 REZONE RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The Applicant has requested a rezone from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b) if the rezone request also requires changes to the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and make a recomm endation to the City Council. Chapter 18.68 ACC contains the intent and process for zoning code amendments, in this case a site -specific zoning map amendment has been requested. Auburn City Code does not contain any specific rezone criteria for City Staff to review; however, Case Law offers some rezone criteria (“A Little Bit Pregnant: The Multi- Personalities of Site Specific Rezones - Or - A Cheat Sheet for Everything You Need to Know about Site- Specific Rezones”, by Phil Olbrechts on mrsc.org, April 1, 2013) as follows: “…require that the proponents of a rezone must establish that conditions have substantially changed since the original adoption and that the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. If a rezone implements the comprehensive plan, a showing that a change of circumstances has occurred is not required.” With the change in City procedures by ordinance No. 6655 to allow concurrent recommendations by the Planning Commission on both the Comprehensive plan and zoning map changes, the recommendations on each should be consistent and therefore does not need to show a change in circumstances has occurred. The requested rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals and welfare. Adequate public facilities such as water, sewer, and electricity, are capable of being provided for the parcels upon future development and would therefore not be detrimental to public health. The rezone itself is not anticipated to allow any uses or acts that would pose any detrimental effects on the morals or welfare of the public; the uses planned by Nexus for future development of the campus would be a benefit to the community by serving a vulnerable population. As for impacts to public safety, the proposed Nexus facilities could be seen to have favorable or unfavorable impacts. Providing services for homeless youth could attract users to the neighborhood that may not typically be there, however, the services are also intended to assist homeless youth to provide shelter and integrate into productive society. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of the Nexus Youth & Families request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment for three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and a rezone from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. EXHIBIT LIST: (Please see the last divider in the ‘working binder’ for these exhibits.) Exhibit 1. CPA17-0002 and REZ17-0001 Staff Report Exhibit 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Exhibit 3. Rezone Application Exhibit 4. Vicinity Map Exhibit 5. Ownership Map Exhibit 6. Chapter 14.22 ACC Exhibit 7. Chapter 18.68 ACC Exhibit 8. SEPA Comment Letter Exhibit 9. Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter, received August 22, 2017 Exhibit 10. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Maps Page 129 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 10 of 10 Exhibit 11. Rezone Maps Exhibit 12. Comprehensive Plan Written Statement from Applicant Exhibit 13. Rezone Written Statement from Applicant Exhibit 14. Conceptual Nexus Campus Plan Exhibit 15. Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance Exhibit 16. Notice of Public Hearing Page 130 of 436 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 10 Exhibit "C" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 3, 2017 (Group #1) Attachment 3 . Agenda bill/staff report dated October 19, 2017 (Group #2) Attachment 4. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA17-0001 – City Initiated) CPM #1 - Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map. "The R-10, R-16 and R- 20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). (See also related P/T #6) CPM #2 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 2.23-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. CPM #3 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 4 privately-owned, previously developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" to recognize and be more compatible with developed status of the properties at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution and outdoor storage. CPM #4 - Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately- owned developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Parcel owned by Quality Fence Co. and located on south side of 21st ST SE, 390 feet east of A ST SE. CPM #5 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately owned and 1 city-owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Parcels are located at the SW corner of Main and Division Street. CPM #6 - Change the mapped land use designation of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117 & 8581400530. CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal jurisdiction parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. The 3 parcels controlled by the Muckleshoot Tribe are developed as a cemetery and thus, the land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Both parcels are located on east side of A ST SE, south of Lakeland Hills WY SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped Page 131 of 436 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 11 land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. CPM #9 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". Both parcels are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #10 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Parcel is located 130 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL. (30811 124TH AVE SE). Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #11 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel is located south of SR 18 at west end of 8th ST SW. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #12 - Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel is located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #13 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcels are located on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #14 - Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Parcels are at various locations in downtown. Some are City-owned; others are privately owned. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #15 - Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Parcels are at various locations. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. CPM #16 - Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with rest of the plat. Parcel is owned by the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #17 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel is located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. Page 132 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 15 Agenda Subject CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Group # 1, City Initiated Plan Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: See separate text & map amendment sections of working binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of Group #1 of the 2017 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015 the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating: Nine policy/text amendments Seventeen map amendments Also, the city received one private-initiated plan map amendment by the submittal deadline which will be presented in a separate staff report in advance of a subsequent hearing. Due to the number of amendments and Planning Commission’s request to phase consideration, this staff report and recommendation addresses a portion of the amendments (Group #1) and specifically: Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments P/T # 1 through # 9 and Map Amendments # 1 through # 3. The remaining amendments will be addressed in subsequently provided staff reports and scheduled for a subsequent hearing(s) before the Planning Commission. In terms of process, the Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: October 18, 2017 Item Number: Attachment 3 Page 133 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 2 of 15 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 9, 2017 deadline for the submittal of private-initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in April 2017. The City received one private-initiated map amendment by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are proposed to be incorporated by reference in the current Capital Facilities Element (Volume 3), of the 2015 Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review decision under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared separately by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by state law. 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the remaining amendments, the City Capital Facilities Plan, and the remaining policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City- initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 19, 2017 (City File # SEP17- 0014). The comment period ended October 3, 2017 and the appeal period ended October 17, 2017. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; Page 134 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 3 of 15 b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. 8. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 25, 2017 by letter and Material ID #24153. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. A copy of the transmittal and acknowledgement is provided in the working binder. 9. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 10. The notice of public hearing was published on October 5, 2017 in the Seattle Times Newspaper which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 18, 2015. A copy of the request to publish is provided in the working binder. Also, a notice was mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendments. 11. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text (P/T) and Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s October 18, 2017 public hearing with a staff recommendation. Page 135 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 4 of 15 Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) P/T #1 Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2017-2023. The CFP was prepared by the district staff and adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Directors on June 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  six–year enrollment projections  Auburn school district level of service standards  An inventory of existing facilities  The district’s overall capacity of the 6-year period  District capital construction Plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,321.86, a decrease of $2,147.51 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $2,081.29, an increase of $441.59. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 to the City Council. P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018 - 2023. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on May 30, 2017. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following: Page 136 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 5 of 15  Overview  An inventory of existing facilities  six–year enrollment projections  standard of service  Capacity projects  Finance plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,760.00, an increase of $360.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,081.00; a decrease of $678.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #3 Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board July 25, 2017 by Resolution No. 2017-12. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  Introduction  Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities  Needs forecast, existing & new facilities  Six–year finance plan  Maps of district boundaries  Building capacities & portable locations  Student forecast  Capacity summaries  Impact fee calculations  Summary of changes from the 2017 plan A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,842.00, representing an increase of $3,644.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,086.00, Page 137 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 6 of 15 an increase of $11,700.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. According to communication from Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster of the Federal Way Public Schools, there are several factors which have driven the impact fees to increase quite significantly in this plan. One factor is the steady increase in observed multiple-family student generation rates. In 2015, the first of three multi-family developments was opened and fully occupied in the City of Federal Way. The second was opened and occupied in late 2016 and the third was opened in fully occupied this summer. The first two developments have been included in the generation rate calculation for this plan. The specific generation rates can be found on Page 29. These multiple-family complexes are generating more than one student per unit which is significantly higher than past developments within the school district. In addition to the high student generation rates, the district completed work with its Facilities Planning Committee which determined a need for additional capacity at a number of schools. As a result of this work, Phase II of the District’s plan will be placed on the November ballot for a bond request. The facilities impacted during Phase II can be found on Page 7 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Anticipated funding for this project can be found on the Six-Year Finance Plan on Page 9. The Finance Plan outlines the anticipated timeline for beginning and completion of the various projects. It is important to note that not all projects within Phase II will create additional capacity. Only costs associated with increasing needed capacity are used in the formula for calculating Impact Fees. The specific cost calculations are outlined on Page 32 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Federal Way School District’s 2018 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T #4 Incorporate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on April 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  Executive Summary  Six-year enrollment projection & history  District standard of service  Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools  Six-year planning & construction plan Page 138 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 7 of 15  Portable classrooms  Projected classroom capacity  Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules  Summary of changes to previous plan A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,100.00$4,990.00, representing a decrease increase of $110.00 $496.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $2,210.00 $2,163.00, a increase decrease of $47.00$1,215.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 to the City Council. P/T #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA requires the following: “A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.” Page 139 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 8 of 15 A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The memo dated September 27, 2017 prepared by the City’s Finance Department contained in the working binder highlights the major changes in the CFP from last year’s CFP by projects completed (removed) and projects added. The City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 is proposed to be incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element (Volume No. 3). Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #6 Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-6 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Mixed Use”. This designation is found under the heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2), so it is appropriately predominantly a “residential” designation. This focus is reinforced by the stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of the Comprehensive Plan, which say: “Description This category shall be applied to those areas that are either now developed or are reserved for multiple family dwellings. Densities may range from 20 to 24 units per acre. These communities are served by transit, have non-motorized connections to surrounding amenities and services, or have access to on-site nonresidential amenities and services.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed high-density residential; or 2. Properties that are connected to single-family and nonresidential designations by the Residential Transition designation or are adjacent to the Multifamily designation, and meet the development parameters of the mixed-use designation.” However, the R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & other uses) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). Page 140 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 9 of 15 Table 18.07.020 Permitted Use Table – Residential Zoning Designations (Excerpt) Also, at Section ACC 18.04.625, the Code provides the following definition of “mixed use development”: “18.04.625 Mixed-use development. “Mixed-use development” means a single unified development that incorporates the planned integration of two or more different land uses consisting of some combination of office, light industrial, hotel, retail, entertainment, public uses, along with residential uses. Mixed-use development may be vertically oriented in one or more buildings, or horizontally distributed on a development site. When horizontally distributed, the different uses may be constructed concurrently and in separate phases, and should incorporate common and/or complementary features and/or elements such as pedestrian walkways, access driveways, parking areas, architectural themes, or other techniques that provide integration between uses on the site.” The Comprehensive plan language goes on to provide that this designation would be implemented by the “Mixed Use Residential” zoning district. This zoning classification does not currently exist and there are no properties that have this zoning classification or a “Mixed Use” land use map designation; therefore elimination of the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map does not negatively affect any properties. It also does not reduce development potential since mixed use is already allowed by the zoning code. Mixed use is currently allowed in the same areas that are described as appropriate for the designation. Page 141 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 10 of 15 Staff does not question the value of having portions of the city where mixed use development is allowed, but does not require a unique comprehensive plan designation to achieve. See exhibit: “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 4. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan to the City Council, as presented by staff. P/T #7 Add text to add back the R-5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family Residential" Land Use Designation. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-4 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Single Family Residential”. This designation is found under the heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2). The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation provides: “Description This designation is the predominant land use category in the City. Maintaining and creating a diverse arrangement of interconnected subdivisions, neighborhoods, and communities that have a mix of densities and housing types; linkages with other residential areas and commercial hubs through non-motorized modes, such as pedestrian and bicycling, and vehicular modes will be encouraged.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed single-family residential areas; 2. Undeveloped areas that do not meet the designation criteria for other Residential, Commercial, Industrial, or Public/Quasi- Public designations; or 3. Residential Conservancy areas that contain limited critical areas, are served by public utilities (water, sewer, storm services), and meet the development parameters of the single-family designation.” “Implementing Zoning Designations Residential 1 (1 dwelling unit per acre): All properties located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-1, as consistent with King County county-wide planning policies. Residential 7 (7 dwelling units per acre): All properties not located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-7.” The R-5 Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification is not currently identified as an implementing zoning district for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected by Page 142 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 11 of 15 adding wording to list the R-5. Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification as an implementing zoning district for the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. Some other minor wording corrections proposed by staff are also shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 1. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to add a listing of R-5 Residential zoning district as an implementing zone of the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. P/T #8 Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". It is requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide more logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. It is requested to revert to the pre-2015 title of the category since the ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ remain similar. The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation in the 2015 Plan provides: “Description Residential transition areas are planned to accommodate moderate densities of varying residential dwelling types. Varying intensities within a transition area may be permitted based on adjacent density, intensity, and/or character. Appropriate densities in these areas range from 7 to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single-family dwelling to multiple-family dwellings, with larger structures allowed (within the density range) where offsetting community benefits can be identified.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed moderate density residential areas; or 2. Areas that provide a transition between single-family and multifamily, single-family and nonresidential, multifamily and nonresidential zones or development are adjacent and meet the development parameters of the Residential Transition designation.” The reversion back to the former name provides a more logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The name change also avoids confusion that would likely occur to potential users by the similarly sounding “Residential Transition Overlay” that was also part of the changes made in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. Also, the description does not provide for any different uses to serve as a ‘transition’, only intermediate residential densities. Page 143 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 12 of 15 Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" P/T #9 Add the "R-10, Residential" and R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Areas of the city are zoned "R-10, Residential" but no areas are currently zoned "R-16, Residential". However, in the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation. To be corrected by adding R-10 and R-16 as implementing zones to either the "Residential Transition" or "Moderate Density" Land Use Designation. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. The title of the category is proposed to change as requested in the preceding text amendment, P/T #8. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added as implementing zoning districts. The City currently contains properties zoned R- 10 Residential; however, there are no properties currently zoned R-16, Residential. The R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential are not currently identified as implementing zoning districts for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. The "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed as implementing zoning districts for the “Moderate Density Residential” land use designation. Some other minor corrections to the wording of this section as proposed by staff are shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 2. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to add a listing of R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential zoning districts as implementing zones of the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #1 Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map (See P/T #6, above). The R-10, R-16 and R-20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Thus it was unnecessary to establish a unique land use designation to achieve a zoning district to allow. Discussion (This is the same topic as text amendment P/T #6, but is repeated as a map amendment since it requires revision to both the text and map of the comprehensive Page 144 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 13 of 15 plan document. See discussion and analysis under text amendment P/T #6. Also, note that a map is not provided as an exhibit since the “Mixed Use” is not shown on the map except in the legend because it does not apply to any properties.) Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to remove the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the Comprehensive Plan map (Map No. 1.1). CPM #2 Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. Discussion The 0.98-acre property was part of a larger 2.23-acre property ownership by Schneider Homes Inc. that was proposed for development as the Pasafino Apartments while in unincorporated King County prior to annexation to the City of Auburn. In 1996 a ‘Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed between the City and Schneider Homes Inc. in order for the City to provide water and sewer services outside the city limits, but within the city’s established utility service area, to the proposed apartment development. An ‘Amended Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed between the City and Schneider Homes Inc. on April 21, 1997. The Agreements provided that as a condition of the City providing utility services, Schneider Homes Inc. would develop a park to city standards and after annexation, convey the developed park land to the City of Auburn without obligation or cost. At the time of transfer, the city parks department would assume maintenance responsibility. The property was annexed to the City of Auburn effective in 2008 by Ordinance No. 6121, however, the transfer of ownership of the park land did not take place for many more years since the park land was not a separate parcel that could be deeded separately to the City. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application (File No. BLA14-0005) was filed by Schneider Homes Inc. in May of 2014 to establish the park land as a separate parcel. The processing of the BLA was delayed due to changes in property ownership interest on the part of Schneider Homes Inc. for refinancing purposes. The BLA was subsequently approved by the City and recorded on November 2, 2016 (Recording No. 20161102900004) and the property subsequently conveyed to the City. It was previously appropriate to have the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of “Multiple “Family Residential" applicable to the site when it was privately-owned and part of a larger property that is mainly developed with apartments. However, now that Parcel No. 0921059073 is a separate parcel that is owned by the City and developed for park purposes, it is appropriate for it to have an “Institutional” land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan consistent with other park properties. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change the mapped land use designation of 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel (Parcel No. 0921059073) from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional" (Map No 1.1). Page 145 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 14 of 15 CPM #3 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of four privately-owned, previously- developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 5401600200 (0.06 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) are owned by Ho & Nancy Kim. Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) is owned by CHS Inc. Parcel No. 5401600260 (0.24 acres) is owned by Gary & Karen Stamps. This proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use map designation to recognize and be more compatible with developed status of the properties located at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution, and outdoor storage. Discussion This is a city-initiated comprehensive plan map amendment to change a group of four adjacent, privately-owned and mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". The purpose of this change is to recognize and be more compatible with the developed status of the properties. The characteristics of the affected parcels are as follows: Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Current Land Use 5401600175/ 232 C ST NW Ho & Nancy Kim 0.7 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former Dels Farm Supply consisting of 5,238 sq ft of warehouse & 1,500 sq ft of attached office/store. Currently unoccupied/ 5401600200/ (No address) Ho & Nancy Kim 0.06 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former railroad spur line bisecting parcel -0200 currently vacant 5401600235/ 301 2nd ST NW CHS Inc. 0.34 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Cenex bulk propane storage tanks 5401600260/ (No address) Gary & Karen Stamps 0.24 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Parking lot /vacant The sites have a “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned DUC, Downtown Urban Center. The contiguous sites are located at the northern edge of the “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation and bordered to the north and the east by properties with an industrial designation. The sites align in a row north to south and are bordered by public streets of C ST NW to the west; 3rd ST NW to the north and by the Burlington Northern railroad to the east. The automobile body shop of A-1 Collision borders the sites to the south. The two largest parcels, Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) have been developed for more than 25 years with structures and facilities that are more appropriate characterized as “industrial uses” than suburban downtown development. The configuration and location of the properties sandwiched between transportation corridors makes them less suitable for redevelopment as downtown Page 146 of 436 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 15 of 15 service or retail type uses geared to leisure shopping. Also, due to the number of zoning inquiries, the City staff has increasing become aware of the difficulty of the property owner in finding tenants that can occupy the former farm supply building and meet the zoning use regulations of the DUC zoning district. Also, few uses are capable of using the building with limited physical alterations in order to avoid triggering consistency with Downtown Design Standards and significant upgrades. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change a group of four privately-owned, mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 5401600175, 5401600200, 5401600235, and 5401600260) Page 147 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 34 Agenda Subject CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Group # 2, City-Initiated Plan Map Amendments and associated rezones REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 Date: October 19, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works, Planning Services Div. Attachments: See Exhibit list at end of report and the separate text & map amendment sections of working binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of Group #2 of the 2017 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and associated rezones (zoning map amendments). Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015 the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating: 9 policy/text amendments 17 map amendments Also, the city received one private-initiated plan map amendment by the submittal deadline which will be presented in a separate staff report in advance of a subsequent hearing. Due to the number of amendments and Planning Commission’s request to phase consideration, this staff report and recommendation addresses a portion of the amendments (Group #2) and specifically: Map Amendments # 4 through # 17. These map amendments are the remaining amendments that were not part of Group #1, previously addressed at the Planning Commission’s October 19, 2017 meeting. In terms of process, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: November 1, 2017 Item Number: Attachment 4 Page 148 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 2 of 34 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 9, 2017 deadline for the submittal of private-initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in April 2017. The City received one private-initiated map amendment by the submittal deadline. This private-initiated amendment is addressed in a separate staff report (File No. CPA17-0002). 3. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 19, 2017 (City File # SEP17-0014). The comment period ended October 3, 2017 and the appeal period ended October 17, 2017. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder. 4. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission Page 149 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 3 of 34 shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 5. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. 6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) and other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 25, 2017 by letter and Material ID #24153. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. A copy of the transmittal by the City and written acknowledgement of receipt by Commerce is provided in the working binder. 7. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 8. The notice of public hearing was published on October 21, 2017 in the Seattle Times Newspaper which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 1, 2017. A copy of the request to publish is provided in the working binder. Also, a notice was mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record. 9. Many of these comprehensive plan changes are corrections to the mapped land use designations made after adoption of the updated comprehensive plan in 2015. The changes increase the consistency of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning as required by ACC 14.22.050, “Conformance and Consistency”. The maps related to these proposed changes are also available to review in the ‘Comp. Plan Map Amendments’ tab of the ‘Working Binder’. 10. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s November 1, 2017 public hearing with a staff recommendation. All of the Policy/Text (P/T) amendments were presented at the October meeting; so no Policy/Text (P/T) amendments are described in this report. Page 150 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 4 of 34 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #4 Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately-owned, developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Discussion The 2.15-acre property was previously a smaller parcel and the comprehensive plan designation boundary followed this original property boundary. In 2004, a boundary line adjustment application was filed (File No. LLA04-0010), approved by the City, and recorded (Recording No. 20040712003209). The boundary line adjustment expanded the parcel boundary to include additional area to the south. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation boundary was not simultaneously changed to correspond to the property boundary change. In the intervening time, the fence contractor business has using the expansion area as part of their yard. It is appropriate to make the change to avoid split designation of a parcel where warranted by existing development pattern and setting. The “Residential Transition” designation makes up a smaller portion of the lot, while the balance is used by a fencing contractor. As shown on the map below, the designation change is consistent with adjacent property located to the west. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #4 to change the mapped land use designation of the southern part of a 2.15-acre, privately-owned, parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial" (Parcel No. 8695200020). Page 151 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 5 of 34 CPM #5 Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately-owned and 1 city- owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned parcels, Nos. 7815700095 (0.17 acres – vacant) and 7815700135 (0.33 acres – parking lot) are owned by Levan Auburn Development LLC and the City-owned Parcel No. 7815700085 (0.19 acres - Plaza park). These contiguous properties are located at the SW corner of W Main ST and Division ST. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Page 152 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 6 of 34 Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. It is requested to revert to former designation of "Downtown Urban Center". These 3 mostly undeveloped parcels are currently zoned “DUC, Downtown Urban Center”. Due to their location in the heart of the city center and economic development potential, these parcels should have the designation "Downtown Urban Center". Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 7815700095 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.17 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Vacant lot 7815700135 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.33 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Parking lot 7815700085 City of Auburn 0.19 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” City’s Plaza Park Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #5 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. (Parcel Nos. 7815700095, 7815700135, & 7815700085) Page 153 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 7 of 34 CPM #6 Change the mapped land use designation (and zoning district) of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 46 parcels 46 city- owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Parcel Nos. 0821059017, 7345300160, 6347000055, 6347000065, Page 154 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 8 of 34 0001000081, 1313500310, 3021059044, 3021059080, 3021059089, 1421049011, 1821059117, 0520061060, 0721059038, 7749501070, 0521059010, 0521059029, 0421059062, 0421059061, 0421059060, 0421059071, 0421059004, 3845000080, 7299602140, 4137070990, 7002181950, 0520051035, 0520051006, 0921059018, 6655000105, 6655000021, 1421049067, 9262800330, 9262800341, 1421049017, 9262800285, 0721059020, 8669150810, 6655000024, 6655000030, 3021059325, 3121059017, 3021059375, 8581400530, 1821059327, 0821059017, & 0621059007 are scattered at various sites. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are city–owned developed parks and contain play areas and active recreational space. And the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. cemeteries and active and mainly developed parks should not be designated "Open Space"). Also, for most parcels the zoning map classification also needs to change from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #6 to change the mapped land use designation of multiple City-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117, & 8581400530 which are already zoned: “I, Institutional”. Page 155 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 9 of 34 Page 156 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 10 of 34 Page 157 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 11 of 34 Page 158 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 12 of 34 Page 159 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 13 of 34 Page 160 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 14 of 34 Page 161 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 15 of 34 CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Parcel No. 2021059041 (1.45 acres US Government)), 2021059047 (24.46 acres, Tribe), & 2021059037 (0.07 acres, Tribe) are proposed for change. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an Page 162 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 16 of 34 “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are Muckleshoot Tribal owned properties that are developed as cemeteries. And the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. cemeteries and active and mainly developed parks should not be designated "Open Space"). Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2021059041 US Government 1.45 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Historic Tribal cemetery 2021059047 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 24.46 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Tribal Cemetery 2021059037 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 0.07 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Street frontage portion of historic Tribal cemetery Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #7 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification (Parcel Nos. 2021059041, 2021059047, & 2021059037). Page 163 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 17 of 34 CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Parcels Nos. are 3121059069, 1.79 acres owned by Alan Clayton and Parcel No. 3121059027, 3.67 acres, owned by John Nixon. Both are located on east side of A ST SE, approx. 600 feet south of Lakeland Hills WY SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent Page 164 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 18 of 34 change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. It is requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Both properties were annexed to the City of Auburn from the City of Pacific in the year 2003 by City of Auburn Ordinance No. 3643. Prior to the annexation, the northern parcel (owned by Mr. Clayton) was zoned “C, Commercial” and the southern parcel (now owned by John Nixon) was zoned “RMH, Multiple Family Residential” in the City of Pacific. Mr. Clayton’s zoning designation of “C, Commercial” was a result of an application for zone change requested by Mr. Clayton and approved by the City of Pacific in August of 1992 by Ordinance No. 1177 (The rezone was to the zoning classification of “BC, Business Commercial” which subsequently became “C, Commercial”.) At annexation to the City of Auburn, the property assumed an “R-5, Residential” zoning designation by default, while the comprehensive plan designation was made “Light Commercial”. Of late, Mr. Clayton has been contacting the City almost annually requesting that the city initiate a change in the zoning designation back to a commercial category. He has always had the ability to submit a private application to initiate the zoning map change himself, and has been advised of this, but was reluctant. The ‘working binder’ under the ‘Map Amendments’ tab and CPM #8, contains a letter from Mr. Clayton dated July 18, 2017 and supporting information in which he describes the history and his request to have the zoning changed. The southern parcel prior to 2015 had a comprehensive plan designation of “Light Commercial” and was previously was zoned “R-5, Residential”. These 2 parcels are the only parcels on the east side of A ST SE, in the vicinity that have a Comprehensive Plan designation of “Single Family Residential”. The adjacent properties to the south were changed to “light Industrial” due to private com plan application last year. The properties to the north have a comprehensive plan designation of “Institutional”. While the comprehensive plan designation was changed in 2015 to “Single Family Residential”, to align with the property’s R-5 Residential zoning, it is the zoning classification that should have been changed. The City now seeks to rectify the circumstances by changing the both the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for both parcels Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 3121059069 (northern) Alan B Clayton 1.79 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential vacant 3121059027/ 5340 A ST SE (southern) John Nixon 3.67 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential Single family residence Staff Recommendation Page 165 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 19 of 34 Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #8 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0004) to correspond to the “C1, Commercial” implementing zoning classification. Parcels Nos. are 3121059069 and Parcel No. 3121059027 CPM #9 Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". Page 166 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 20 of 34 Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". The 1.75 -acre Parcel No. 0921059042 owned by Highlane Prop. LLP and 0.81-acre parcel No. 0921059113 owned by Jennifer & James Hunt both are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of 2015 plan and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 0921059042 Highlane Prop. LLP 1.75 - acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant 0921059113 Jennifer & Eric Hunt 0.81-acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #9 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". (Parcels Nos. are 0921059042 and 0921059113). Page 167 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 21 of 34 CPM #10 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel near the intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately owned 0.91- acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". The Parcel No. 0921059101 is owned by Ram Singh Dhaliwal is located 130 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL (Address is 30811 Page 168 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 22 of 34 124th AVE SE). The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of map amendment CPM #10 to change the land use designation of a 0.91-acre parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential" (Parcel No. 0921059101). Page 169 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 23 of 34 CPM #11 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84 -acre parcel addressed as 521 - 8TH ST SW. from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a single 286,000 square foot multiple tenant warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 1321049019 is owned by Western B NW WA LLC and located south of State Route 18 (SR) at the west end of 8th ST SW (Address is 521 8TH ST SW .) The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #11 to change the land use designation of an approximately 13.84-acre parcel from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 1321049019). Page 170 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 24 of 34 CPM #12 Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private parcel located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel No. 5530200000, owned by Lois Maathuis, is located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. The site is Page 171 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 25 of 34 developed as a series of 13 multiple-family, 2-story buildings containing a total of 102 dwelling units, known as the ‘Mill Pond at Lakeland Condominiums’. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #12 to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private parcel developed with condominiums from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". (Parcel No. 5530200000). Page 172 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 26 of 34 CPM #13 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 adjacent parcels located north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" and with “Residential Transition Overlay” to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197 are owned by various property owners & located on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2721059053 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.22 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059063 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.06 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Access Tract 2721059066 Orrozco, Salvador and Val 0.23 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059126 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.52 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059156 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.39 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059157 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.36 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059162 Huang, Angelina and Yao 0.63 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059168 Bunkhan, Chakkaphan and Suphawan 0.19 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059179 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.42 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Triplex 2721059197 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.23 “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex Page 173 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 27 of 34 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #13 to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197). CPM #14 Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels located at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Page 174 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 28 of 34 Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Some are City- owned; others are privately owned. Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Downtown Urban Center". The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #14 to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center" (Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040). Page 175 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 29 of 34 CPM #15 Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills community from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. The location of the parcels within the Page 176 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 30 of 34 Lakeland special planning area is shown on the map. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #15 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. Page 177 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 31 of 34 CPM #16 Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility on the south side of 35th St SE, from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a 0.21-acre city- owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with designation applicable to the balance of the plat. Parcel No. 1877100170 is owned by the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. The lot for the stormwater facility was created from the "D ST SE Plat" and should retain the same comprehensive plan designation as the balance of the plat. It is not the intention of the Comprehensive Plan designation to apply a separate classification to each special purpose lot or tract needed to support the overall subdivision. Land use designations should apply to broad geographic areas based on compatibility and generally not on an individual parcel basis. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #16 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of 0.21-acre city- owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel No. 1877100170). Page 178 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 32 of 34 CPM #17 Change the mapped land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately- owned parcel located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel No. 1921059271 owned by Mayfield TNC LLC is located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. According to KC Assessor records, Page 179 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 33 of 34 the property is developed with two, 2-story buildings as the "Mayfield Apartments" containing 31 dwelling units. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #17 to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family" (Parcel No. 1921059271). Page 180 of 436 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 34 of 34 EXHIBIT LIST: Exhibit 1. Staff Report Group #2 Amendments - CPA17-0001 and REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003 & REZ17- 0004 Exhibit 2. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Maps (Thumbnails of maps are provided in the staff report and full size maps are available in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 3. Rezone Maps (Full size maps are in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 4. WA State Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter dated September 26, 2017 (in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 5. Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance (in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 6. Notice of Public Hearing (Attached) Page 181 of 436 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 12 Exhibit "D" The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan Excerpt of “Volume 1 - Land Use Element” of the City Comprehensive Plan (Pages LU-4 through LU-7) with strike through and underlines to show changes (Four of the nine text amendments are contained within this excerpt). P/T #6 - Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R10, R16, and R20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). P/T #7 - Add text to add back the R5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family" Land Use Designation. The 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comp. Plan land use designation and must be corrected. P/T #8 - Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide a distinct and logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. P/T #9 - Add the "R-10, Residential" and R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. In the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comp. Plan land use designation. (See “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab - Attachment 5 ) Page 182 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 26, 2017 Attachment 5 Page 183 of 436 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: Ray Vefik Robyn Mulenga Anne Baunach (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Ryan Van Quill Laurie Bishop Page 184 of 436 Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service…………………… Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..… Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Table of Contents Page 185 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section I Executive Summary Page 186 of 436 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2017. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 24 students and 17.3 students for our nine schools designated as serving high poverty areas; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 26 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 29 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 23.35 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s Page 187 of 436 3 2016-17 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 15,945 as of October 1, 2016. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, is scheduled to start construction in March 2018. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Page 188 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2017 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 18.23 to 17.3 students at 9 elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas in 2016-17. Maximum K-2 class sizes remains at 24 students at the remaining 5 elementary schools. B. Maximum third and fourth grade class size remains at 26 students. C. Maximum 5th grade class size remains at 29 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 1 portable at Evergreen Heights Elementary School. B. Add 1 portable at Gildo Rey Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Lakeland Hills Elementary School. D. Add 1 portable at Auburn Mountainview High School. Section V Pupil Capacity The four portables to be placed in August 2017 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 4 Page 189 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2016 to 2017 CPF CPF 2016 2017 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2260 0.1930 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0820 0.0770 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0940 0.0730 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0720 0.1030 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0220 0.0310 Sr. High 0.0440 0.0440 School Construction Costs Elementary $48,500,000 $48,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $413,463 $434,136 Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $213.23 $213.23 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2016) Match % - State 63.83% 63.29% Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017) Match % - District 36.89% 36.71% Computed District Average AV Single Family $269,764 $292,035 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $113,408 $127,147 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $1.59 $2.65 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.27% 3.95% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2016 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2017 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2017 DATA ELEMENTS From replacement school cost estimate in May 2016. 5 Page 190 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section II Enrollment Projections Page 191 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2017) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1237 1281 1331 1383 1430 1474 1516 1 1210 1292 1342 1395 1441 1485 1528 2 1300 1242 1331 1383 1430 1473 1516 3 1317 1321 1270 1359 1406 1450 1492 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1430 1472 5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1451 K - 5 7500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 6 - 8 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 10 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1471 11 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 12 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 9 - 12 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 TOTALS 15,945 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,485 19,007 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 7500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 6-8 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9-12 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 K-12 15,945 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,485 19,007 7 Page 192 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section III Standard of Service Page 193 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,500 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,392 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,053 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 23.35 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 23.35 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eleven classrooms to provide for 107 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 9 Page 194 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 23.35 each = (163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (163) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.358 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 23.35 each = (234) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (234) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 23.35 each = (93) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (93) 10 Page 195 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 23.35 each = (187) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (187) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides an Early Childhood Education Assistance Program to meet local needs for disadvantaged students. The State has funded an increase of 24 ECEAP seats. This program will require two new classrooms for 2015-16. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) 11 Page 196 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 12 Page 197 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 13 Page 198 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 11 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) 14 Page 199 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,845) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,845) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (630) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,360) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,360) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (3,835) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,835) 15 Page 200 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Page 201 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 17 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,100 20.50 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) Page 202 of 436 Page 203 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2017) Elementary Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Washington 5566666 Terminal Park 6778880 Dick Scobee 7700000 Pioneer 7770000 Chinook 6777000 Lea Hill 5566600 Gildo Rey 7788888 Evergreen Heights 5566666 Alpac 6677777 Lake View 2223333 Hazelwood 2344444 Ilalko 6677777 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7778888 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4566666 TOTAL UNITS 75 79 80 76 69 63 55 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,860 1,959 1,984 1,885 1,711 1,562 1,364 Middle School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Cascade 0011222 Olympic 0011222 Rainier 5678999 Mt. Baker 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 16 20 21 24 24 24 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 480 600 630 720 720 720 Sr. High School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 West Auburn 0011111 Auburn High School 0001111 Auburn High School - *TAP 1111111 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 4455566 TOTAL UNITS 18 18 20 21 21 22 22 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 540 600 630 630 660 660 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 107 113 120 118 114 109 101 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,820 2,979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 19 Page 204 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section V Pupil Capacity Page 205 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,015) (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) C. Net Capacity 14,717 14,876 15,081 15,692 16,258 16,139 15,941 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,465 19,007 19,525 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,701) (1,969) (2,342) (2,258) (2,207) (2,868)(3,584) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,820 2,979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) Total Adjustments (1,015) (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) Table V.2 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) C. Net Capacity 11,897 11,897 11,897 12,547 13,197 13,197 13,197 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,465 19,007 19,525 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,521) (4,948) (5,526) (5,403) (5,268) (5,810)(6,328) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) Total Adjustments (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 24.38% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 22.52% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 21 Page 206 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PUPIL CAPACITY A. Elementary Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 B. Middle Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 C. Senior High Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) 22 Page 207 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Page 208 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 24 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. Page 209 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 25 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015/16 school year. Page 210 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 26 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School is scheduled to begin in March 2018. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,062 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects include improvements at the Support Services Center, Transportation Center, replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement at Auburn Mountainview High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn Riverside High School. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2017-23 Capital Construction Plan (May 2017) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 All Facilities - Technology 2013 Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy 1/ Portables Yes $2,500,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 3 New Elementaries Yes $14,900,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Cap. Levy Impact Fee XX XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX plan XX plan XX const XX const XX const XX const XX const 1/ Replacement of one Middle School Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX plan XX const XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. Page 211 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VII Impact Fees Page 212 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2017)Elementary #15 within 3 year periodElementary #16 within 4 year periodI. SITE COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student FactorSite Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) 12 $434,136 650 0.1930 0.1030 $1,546.86 $825.53Middle Sch (6 - 8) 25 $0 800 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) 40 $0 1500 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$1,546.86 $825.53II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage)Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $48,500,000 650 0.9451 0.1930 0.1030 $13,609.76 $7,263.24Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0 800 0.9451 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 0.9451 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$13,609.76 $7,263.24III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio)Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $170,000 23.35 0.0549 0.1930 0.1030 $77.18 $41.19Mid Sch (6 - 8) $170,000 30 0.0549 0.0770 0.0310 $23.97 $9.65Sr High (9 - 12) $170,000 30 0.0549 0.0730 0.0440 $22.72 $13.70 $123.86 $64.53IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor)Boeckh SPI State Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $213.23 90 63.29% 0.1930 0.1030 $2,344.14 $1,251.02Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0.00 108 63.29% 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0.00 130 63.29% 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00 $2,344.14 $1,251.03Student Generation Factor28Page 213 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: Expressed as the present value of an annuityTC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi FamilySingle Family $292,035 $2.65 3.95% 10$6,292.62Multi Family $127,147 $2.65 3.95% 10$2,739.70VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDITFormula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility CreditSingle Family $0.00 1$0.00Multi Family $0.00 1$0.00 FEEPER UNIT IMPACT FEESRECAP Single MultiSUMMARY Family FamilySite Costs $1,546.86 $825.53Permanent Facility Const Costs $13,609.76 $7,263.24Temporary Facility Costs $123.86 $64.53State Match Credit ($2,344.14) ($1,251.03)Tax Credit ($6,292.62) ($2,739.70)FEE (No Discount) $6,643.73 $4,162.58FEE (50% Discount) $3,321.86 $2,081.29Less ASD Discount Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00Net Fee Obligation $3,321.86 $2,081.2929Page 214 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr HighK - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2017 0.193 0.077 0.073 0.103 0.031 0.044New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2017 $48,500,000 $48,500,000Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 23.35 30 30 23.3530 30Grades K - 5 @ 23.35 and 6 - 12 @ 30.Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40Site Cost/Acre See below $434,136 $434,136 $434,136 $434,136 $434,136$434,136Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317Temp Sq Footage 107 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850% - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51%% - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49%SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for December 2012 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23Match % - State From SPI Webpage December 2012 63.29% 63.29% 63.29%63.29% 63.29% 63.29%Match % - District Computed 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71%Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2015 $292,035 $292,035 $292,035 $127,147 $127,147 $127,147Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2017) 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95%Site Cost ProjectionsRecent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date ProjectedAcquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/AcreLakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $467,940 5.00% Elementary 2017$455,843Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $336,940 5.00% Elementary 2018 $478,635Lakeland East 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 $336,747 $497,528 5.00% Elementary2022 $581,783Total 74.00$19,395,002 $262,095 $434,13630Page 215 of 436 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 216 of 436 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 217 of 436 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2016 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are:  Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next.  Factor 2 – Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period.  Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. Page 218 of 436 2 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below.  Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole.  Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.  Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain.  Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison.  Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the fifth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 282 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 1.62% annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 244 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 971 to 1,300. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 688 to 692. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 692 to 774. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 2,179 to 3,047. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,289 to 1,536. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 1,569 to 1,659. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. Page 219 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments(Rev 10/16)1ActualGRADE 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-1616-17KDG 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 12371 960 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 12102 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 13003 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 13174 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 12375 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 11996 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 11527 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 11328 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 11089 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 126110 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 124811 1055 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 131812 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226TOTALS 13,672 14,088 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,277 15,66315,945Percent of Gain 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99%(0.78)% (0.73)% (0.82)%1.62% 2.57% 2.04% 2.53% 1.80%Pupil Gain 416 330 141 144(114) (107) (119)233 375 306 386 282Average % Gain for 1st 6 years. 0.97% Average % Gain for last 6 years 1.62%Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 135 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 244Average % Gain for 13 years. 1.30%Average Pupil Gain for 13 years. 189TABLE1A Grade Group CombinationsKDG 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237K,1,2 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766 3747K - 5 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340 7500K - 6 6755 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 8456 86521 - 3 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 3800 38271 - 5 4843 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 6142 62631 - 6 5863 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 7258 74156 - 8 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 3351 33927 - 8 2254 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 2235 22407 - 9 3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 3464 35019 - 12 4663 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 4972 505310 - 12 3202 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743 3792Page 3 October 2016Page 220 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE Factors Used in Projections Factor AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS2 3 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATESCAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTENFactor Average Pupil Change Between Grade ENDAR LIVE 2/3rds 1/3rds OFLIVE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A % OF1 Levels YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1976 13,761 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856%K to 1 48.83 K to 1 52.67 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 666 4.452%1 to 2 18.67 1 to 2 30.00 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 726 4.524%2 to 3 16.50 2 to 3 18.67 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 792 4.740%3 to 4 27.50 3 to 4 22.17 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 829 4.876%4 to 5 22.00 4 to 5 20.50 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 769 4.216%5 to 6 1.67 5 to 6(4.83)1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18,626 817 4.386%6 to 7 17.42 6 to 7 19.33 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 89/90 18,827 871 4.626%7 to 8 12.50 7 to 8 11.83 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 858 4.398%8 to 9 184.33 8 to 9 147.00 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 91/92 19,893 909 4.569%9 to 10 0.92 9 to 10 8.83 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 92/93 21,852 920 4.210%10 to 11(27.50)10 to 11(11.17)1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93/94 21,624 930 4.301%11 to 12 40.58 11 to 12 74.50 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 94/95 24,062 927 3.853%total 363.42 total 389.50 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 95/96 26,358 954 3.619%Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of pupils as they 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96/97 24,116 963 3.993%move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 97/98 20,973 978 4.663%the past (12) OR (5) years of changes. 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 854 3.959%1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 849 3.837%Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 912 3.798%2 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 01/02 22,717 846 3.724% 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,622 905 4.186%K 28.75 K 41.60 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 922 4.186%1 20.83 1 28.40 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041%2 25.67 2 40.60 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 05/06 22,327 955 4.277%3 33.25 3 64.20 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 06/07 22,014 941 4.274%4 18.42 4 43.00 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21,835 996 4.562%5 20.17 5 36.20 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 998 4.487%6 11.00 6 17.80 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 09/10 22,726 1032 4.541%7 0.67 7 20.00 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 1010 4.441%8(1.83)8 12.40 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11/12 23,723 1029 4.338%9(16.67)9(2.40)2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 12/13 24,683 1098 4.448%10(1.08)10 15.60 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 13/14 25,094 1162 4.631%Last 511 21.92 11 17.00 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 14/15 25,101 1232 4.908%year12 28.33 12(18.00)2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 15/16 24,695 1198 4.851%AverageFactor 2 is the average change in grade level size 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 16/17 24,5911237 Actual5.030%4.774%from 01/02 OR 08/09. 2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 17/18 24,8981189<--Prjctd year2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 18/19 24,9511191<--Prjctd year2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 19/20 25,2021203<--Prjctd year2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 20/21 25,4411214<--Prjctd2015 25,487 16,991 8,496 21/22 * number from DOHSource: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of HealthPage 4 October 2016Page 221 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016Contact Todd Rime - todd.rime@doh.wa.gov 360-236-4323TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 16111 1210 1286 1315 1343 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 1573 1602 16312 1300 1229 1305 1333 1362 1391 1420 1448 1477 1506 1535 1563 1592 16213 1317 1317 1245 1321 1350 1379 1407 1436 1465 1494 1522 1551 1580 16094 1237 1345 1344 1273 1349 1377 1406 1435 1464 1492 1521 1550 1579 16075 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1399 1428 1457 1486 1514 1543 1572 16016 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 15737 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1418 1447 1476 1505 1533 15628 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1431 1460 1488 1517 15469 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1615 1644 1673 170110 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1616 1645 167411 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1589 161712 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1629TOTALS 15,945 16,348 16,648 17,073 17,514 17,951 18,381 18,803 19,204 19,575 19,866 20,187 20,608 20,981Percent of Gain 2.53% 1.83% 2.56% 2.58% 2.50% 2.40% 2.29% 2.14% 1.93% 1.49% 1.61% 2.08% 1.81%Pupil Gain 403 299 426 440 438 430 421 402 370 292 321 421 374TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 17781 1210 1290 1331 1373 1414 1456 1498 1539 1581 1622 1664 1706 1747 17892 1300 1240 1320 1361 1403 1444 1486 1528 1569 1611 1652 1694 1736 17773 1317 1319 1259 1338 1380 1422 1463 1505 1546 1588 1630 1671 1713 17544 1237 1339 1341 1281 1361 1402 1444 1485 1527 1569 1610 1652 1693 17355 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1423 1464 1506 1547 1589 1631 1672 17146 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1418 1459 1501 1543 1584 1626 16677 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1437 1479 1520 1562 1604 16458 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1449 1491 1532 1574 16159 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1596 1638 1679 172110 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1605 1646 168811 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1594 163512 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1668TOTALS 15,945 16,387 16,704 17,144 17,604 18,111 18,624 19,140 19,655 20,153 20,590 21,067 21,646 22,187Percent of Gain 2.77% 1.94% 2.63% 2.68% 2.88% 2.83% 2.77% 2.69% 2.53% 2.17% 2.32% 2.75% 2.50%Pupil Gain 442 317 440 460 507 513 515 515 498 437 477 579 541Page 5 October 2016Page 222 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30K 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214 1 1210 1286 1237 1240 1252 1263 2 1300 1229 1305 1256 1259 1271 1282 3 1317 1317 1245 1321 1273 1275 1287 12984 1237 1345 1344 1273 1349 1300 1303 1315 13265 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1322 1325 1337 13486 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1324 1326 1338 13507 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1341 1344 1356 13678 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1354 1356 1368 13809 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1538 1540 1552 156410 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1539 1541 155311 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1511 151412 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1552TOTALS 15,945 16,271 16,467 16,772 17,075Percent of Gain 2.04% 1.20% 1.85% 1.81%Pupil Gain 326 196 305 303TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214 1 1210 1290 1241 1244 1256 12672 1300 1240 1320 1271 1274 1286 12973 1317 1319 1259 1338 1290 1292 1304 13164 1237 1339 1341 1281 1361 1312 1315 1327 13385 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1333 1335 1347 13586 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1328 1330 1342 13547 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1347 1350 1362 13738 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1359 1361 1373 13859 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1506 1508 1520 153210 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1515 1517 152911 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1504 150612 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1578TOTALS 15,945 16,297 16,485 16,766 17,037Percent of Gain 2.21% 1.15% 1.71% 1.62%Pupil Gain 352 188 281 271Page 6 October 2016Page 223 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13 Based on 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 16111 1210 1286 1315 1343 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 1573 1602 16312 1300 1229 1305 1333 1362 1391 1420 1448 1477 1506 1535 1563 1592 16213131713171245132113501379140714361465149415221551158016094123713451344127313491377140614351464149215211550157916075 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1399 1428 1457 1486 1514 1543 1572 1601 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7700 7869 7960 8079 8299 8471 8644 8816 8989 9161 9334 9506 9679 971 2179Percent of Gain 2.67% 2.19% 1.15% 1.50% 2.72% 2.08% 2.04% 2.00% 1.96% 1.92% 1.88% 1.85% 1.81%Pupil Gain 200 169 90 120 220 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 17781 1210 1290 1331 1373 1414 1456 1498 1539 1581 1622 1664 1706 1747 17892 1300 1240 1320 1361 1403 1444 1486 1528 1569 1611 1652 1694 1736 17773 1317 1319 1259 1338 1380 1422 1463 1505 1546 1588 1630 1671 1713 17544123713391341128113611402144414851527156916101652169317355 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1423 1464 1506 1547 1589 1631 1672 1714 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7724 7930 8076 8263 8550 8800 9049 9299 9549 9798 10048 1029710547 1300 3047Percent of Gain 2.98% 2.68% 1.84% 2.30% 3.48% 2.92% 2.84% 2.76% 2.68% 2.61% 2.55% 2.48% 2.42%Pupil Gain 224 207 146 186 288 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30K 1237 1189 1191 1203 12141 1210 1286 1237 1240 1252 12632 1300 1229 1305 1256 1259 1271 12823 1317 1317 1245 1321 1273 1275 1287 129841237134513441273134913001303131513265 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1322 1325 1337 1348 4 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7623 7689 7659 7641141Percent of Gain 1.64% 0.86%(0.39)% (0.24)%Pupil Gain 123 66(30) (18)TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1189 1191 1203 12141 1210 1290 1241 1244 1256 12672 1300 1240 1320 1271 1274 1286 12973 1317 1319 1259 1338 1290 1292 1304 131641237133913411281136113121315132713385 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1333 1335 1347 1358 4 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7634 7711 7699 7696196Percent of Gain 1.78% 1.02%(0.16)% (0.04)%Pupil Gain 134 78(13) (3)Page 7 October 2016Page 224 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 15737 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1418 1447 1476 1505 1533 15628 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1431 1460 1488 1517 1546 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4117 4250 4336 4423 4509 4595 4681 692 1289Percent of Gain 3.61% 4.16% 5.91% 4.31% 0.88% 0.10% 0.81% 3.24% 2.03% 1.99% 1.95% 1.91% 1.88%Pupil Gain 123 146 216 167 36 4 33 133 86 86 86 86 86TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1418 1459 1501 1543 1584 1626 16677 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1437 1479 1520 1562 1604 16458 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1449 1491 1532 1574 1615 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4141 4304 4429 4553 4678 4803 4928 688 1536Percent of Gain 3.46% 3.99% 5.56% 4.21% 1.09% .53% 1.50% 3.93% 2.90% 2.82% 2.74% 2.67% 2.60%Pupil Gain 117 140 203 162 44 21 61 163 125 125 125 125 125TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1324 1326 1338 13507 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1341 1344 1356 13678 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1354 1356 1368 1380 6 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4040 4069 4036 4061 692 669Percent of Gain 3.61% 4.16% 5.91% 4.31% 0.88% 0.10%(1.08)%0.74%(0.83)%0.64%Pupil Gain 123 146 216 167 36 4(44)30(34)26TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1328 1330 1342 13547 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1347 1350 1362 13738 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1359 1361 1373 1385 6 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4051 4085 4051 4077 688 685Percent of Gain 3.46% 3.99% 5.56% 4.21% 1.09% 0.53%(0.71)%0.83%(0.83)%0.64%Pupil Gain 117 140 203 162 44 21(29)34(34)26Page 8 October 2016Page 225 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1615 1644 1673 170110 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1616 1645 167411 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1589 161712 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1629 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6282 6344 6507 6622 774 1569Percent of Gain 1.59%(0.31)%2.33% 2.94% 3.39% 4.55% 3.70% 1.58% 1.82% 0.52% 0.99% 2.55% 1.77%Pupil Gain 80(16)119 154 183 254 216 96 112 33 62 162 115TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1596 1638 1679 172110 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1605 1646 168811 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1594 163512 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1668 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6238 6341 6546 6712 692 1659Percent of Gain 2.00%(0.57)%1.78% 2.13% 3.30% 4.40% 3.56% 1.72% 2.04% 1.02% 1.65% 3.22% 2.54%Pupil Gain 101(30)91 111 176 242 205 102 124 63 103 204 166TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1538 1540 1552 156410 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1539 1541 155311 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1511 151412 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1552 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6205 6164 6206 6183 774 1130Percent of Gain 1.59%(0.31)%2.33% 2.94% 3.39% 4.55% 3.70% 1.58% 1.82%(0.71)% (0.67)%0.68%(0.36)%Pupil Gain 80(16)119 154 183 254 216 96 112(44) (41)42(23)TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1506 1508 1520 153210 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1515 1517 152911 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1504 150612 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1578 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6148 6122 6168 6145 692 1092Percent of Gain 2.00%(0.57)%1.78% 2.13% 3.30% 4.40% 3.56% 1.72% 2.04%(0.44)% (0.43)%0.75%(0.37)%Pupil Gain 101(30)91 111 176 242 205 102 124(27) (26)46(23)Page 9 October 2016Page 226 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS4 BY GRADE GROUPKINDERGARTENACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearE.13 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 1611 173374E.6 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 1778 250 541E.13A 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214E.6A 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214GRD 1 -- GRD 5ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearE.13 6263 6435 6575 6636 6727 6918 7062 7205 7349 7493 7637 7780 7924 8068 7991805E.6 6263 6445 6610 6715 6859 7105 7313 7521 7729 7937 8145 8353 8561 8769 10502506E.13A 6263 6435 6498 6456 6426E.6A 6263 6445 6520 6495 6481GRD 6 -- GRD 8ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearMS.13 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4117 4250 4336 4423 4509 4595 4681 692 1289MS.6 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4141 4304 4429 4553 4678 4803 4928 6881536MS.13A 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4040 4069 4036 4061 692MS.6A 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4051 4085 4051 4077 688GRD 9 -- GRD 12ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearSH.13 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6282 6344 6507 6622 774 1569SH.6 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6238 6341 6546 6712 6921659SH.13A 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6205 6164 6206 6183 774 1130SH.6A 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6148 6122 6168 6145 692 1092DISTRICT TOTALSACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 year3.13 15,945 16,348 16,648 17,073 17,514 17,951 18,381 18,803 19,204 19,575 19,866 20,187 20,608 20,981 2436 50363.6 15,945 16,387 16,704 17,144 17,604 18,111 18,624 19,140 19,655 20,15320,590 21,067 21,646 22,187 2679 62423.13A 15,945 16,271 16,467 16,772 17,0753.6A 15,945 16,297 16,485 16,766 17,037Page 10 October 2016Page 227 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6142 xxx xxx 6198 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5723(12) (0.21)%5655(232) (3.94)%5761(272) (4.51)%5750(392) (6.38)%5871(327) (5.28)%Prj 3E.6 5735 0 0.00% 5662(225) (3.82)%5821(212) (3.51)%5795(347) (5.65)%5921(277) (4.47)%Prj 3E.13A 5743 8 0.14% 5605(282) (4.79)%5709(324) (5.37)%5750(392) (6.38)%5869(329) (5.31)%Prj 3E.6A 5776 41 0.71% 5631(256) (4.35)%5756(277) (4.59)%5784(358) (5.83)%5912(286) (4.61)%Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3274 xxx xxx 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3025(249) (7.61)%3185 16 0.50% 3214 70 2.23% 3295 198 6.39% 3131(75) (2.34)%Prj 3E.6 3011(263) (8.03)%3192 23 0.73% 3216 72 2.29% 3311 214 6.91% 3146(60) (1.87)%Prj 3E.13A 3025(249) (7.61)%3185 16 0.50% 3214 70 2.23% 3295 198 6.39% 3131(75) (2.34)%Prj 3E.6A 3011(263) (8.03)%3192 23 0.73% 3216 72 2.29% 3311 214 6.91% 3146(60) (1.87)%Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 4663 xxx xxx 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4455(208) (4.46)%4577(455) (9.04)%4630(611) (11.66)%4783(537) (10.09)%5085(214) (4.04)%Prj 3E.6 4476(187) (4.01)%4594(438) (8.70)%4639(602) (11.49)%4769(551) (10.36)%5086(213) (4.02)%Prj 3E.13A 4455(208) (4.46)%4577(455) (9.04)%4630(611) (11.66)%4783(537) (10.09)%5085(214) (4.04)%Prj 3E.6A 4476(187) (4.01)%4594(438) (8.70)%4639(602) (11.49)%4769(551) (10.36)%5086(213) (4.02)%All 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 13,672 xxx xxx 14,088 xxx xxx 14,418 xxx xxx 14,559 xxx xxx 14,703 xxxxxxPrj 3E.13 13,203(469) (3.43)%13,417(671) (4.76)%13,605(813) (5.64)%13,828(731) (5.02)%14,087(616) (4.19)%Prj 3E.6 13,222(450) (3.29)%13,448(640) (4.54)%13,676(742) (5.15)%13,875(684) (4.70)%14,153(550) (3.74)%Prj 3E.13A 13,223(449) (3.28)%13,367(721) (5.12)%13,553(865) (6.00)%13,828(731) (5.02)%14,085(618) (4.20)%Prj 3E.6A 13,263(409) (2.99)%13,417(671) (4.76)%13,611(807) (5.60)%13,864(695) (4.77)%14,144(559) (3.80)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUPPage 11 October 2016Page 228 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 6159 xxx xxx 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxx 6805 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 6085(74) (1.20)%6179(29) (0.47)%6254 24 0.39% 6282(207) (3.19)%6275(530) (7.79)%Prj 3E.6 6138(21) (0.34)%6237 29 0.47% 6294 64 1.03% 6323(166) (2.56)%6267(538) (7.91)%Prj 3E.13A 6059(100) (1.62)%6129(79) (1.27)%6237 7 0.11% 6252(237) (3.65)%6266(539) (7.92)%Prj 3E.6A 6094(65) (1.06)%6172(36) (0.58)%6264 34 0.55% 6269(220) (3.39)%6260(545) (8.01)%Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3196 xxx xxx 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3264 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3107(89) (2.78)%3179(34) (1.06)%3242 101 3.22% 3234 90 2.86% 3221(43) (1.32)%Prj 3E.6 3116(80) (2.50)%3195(18) (0.56)%3243 102 3.25% 3236 92 2.93% 3211(53) (1.62)%Prj 3E.13A 3107(89) (2.78)%3179(34) (1.06)%3242 101 3.22% 3234 90 2.86% 3221(43) (1.32)%Prj 3E.6A 3116(80) (2.50)%3195(18) (0.56)%3243 102 3.25% 3236 92 2.93% 3211(53) (1.62)%Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5234 xxx xxx 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxx 4902 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5190(44) (0.84)%5129 68 1.34% 5074 82 1.64% 4921(42) (0.85)%4901(1) (0.02)%Prj 3E.6 5192(42) (0.80)%5155 94 1.86% 5128 136 2.72% 5027 64 1.29% 5017 115 2.35%Prj 3E.13A 5190(44) (0.84)%5129 68 1.34% 5074 82 1.64% 4921(42) (0.85)%4901(1) (0.02)%Prj 3E.6A 5192(42) (0.80)%5155 94 1.86% 5129 137 2.74% 5027 64 1.29% 5017 115 2.35%All 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 14,589 xxx xxx 14,482 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,596 xxx xxx 14,971 xxxxxxPrj 3E.13 14,382(207) (1.42)%13,499(173) (6.79)%14,570 898 6.57% 14,437(159) (1.09)%14,397(574)(3.83)%Prj 3E.6 14,446(143) (0.98)%13,542(130) (6.49)%14,665 993 7.26% 14,586(10)(0.07)% 14,495(476)(3.18)%Prj 3E.13A 14,356(233) (1.60)%13,447(225) (7.15)%14,553 881 6.44% 14,407(189) (1.29)%14,388(583)(3.89)%Prj 3E.6A 14,402(187) (1.28)%13,510(162) (6.71)%14,636 964 7.05% 14,532(64)(0.44)% 14,488(483)(3.23)%BY GRADE GROUP (Continued)PROJECTION COMPARISONSPage 12 October 2016Page 229 of 436 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average Historical Data is grouped byK - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulationACTUAL 7061 xxx xxx 7340 xxxxxx7500 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern.Prj 3E.13 6372(689) (9.76)%6659(681) (9.28)%7052(448) (5.97)% (245) (4.43)%Prj 3E.6 6368(693) (9.81)%6632(708) (9.65)%7046(454) (6.05)% (220) (4.02)%Articulation pattern has noPrj 3E.13A 6346(715) (10.13)%6643(697) (9.50)%6979(521) (6.95)% (268) (4.82)%numeric impact on efficacyPrj 3E.6A 6339(722) (10.23)%6611(729) (9.93)%6966(534) (7.12)% (249) (4.49)%of projection models.Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 3238 xxx xxx 3351 xxx xxx 3392 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3143(95) (2.93)%3230(121) (3.61)%3256(136)(4.01)%(21) (0.80)%Prj 3E.6 3132(106) (3.27)%3213(138) (4.12)%3246(146)(4.30)%(20) (0.78)%Prj 3E.13A 3143(95) (2.93)%3230(121) (3.61)%3256(136)(4.01)%(21) (0.80)%Prj 3E.6A 3132(106) (3.27)%3213(138) (4.12)%3246(146)(4.30)%(20) (0.78)%Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 4978 xxx xxx 4972 xxx xxx 5053 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4813(165) (3.31)%4773(199) (4.00)%4874(179) (3.54)% (180) (3.76)%Prj 3E.6 4906(72) (1.45)%4856(116) (2.33)%4956(97) (1.92)% (141) (2.84)%Prj 3E.13A 4813(165) (3.31)%4773(199) (4.00)%4874(179) (3.54)% (180) (3.76)%Prj 3E.6A 4906(72) (1.45)%4856(116) (2.33)%4956(97) (1.92)% (141) (2.83)%All 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average AverageGrades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 15,277 xxx xxx 15,663 xxx xxx 15,945 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 14,328(949) (6.21)%14,662(1,001) (6.39)%15,182(763) (4.79)% (479) (3.61)%Prj 3E.6 14,406(871) (5.70)%14,701(962) (6.14)%15,248(697) (4.37)% (412) (3.16)%Prj 3E.13A 14,302(975) (6.38)%14,646(1,017) (6.49)%15,109(836) (5.24)% (505) (3.79)%Prj 3E.6A 14,377(900) (5.89)%14,680(983) (6.28)%15,168(777) (4.87)% (441) (3.35)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUP (Continued)Page 13 October 2016Page 230 of 436 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Page 231 of 436 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULEStudent Generation FactorsASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi-1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2017 SF 2017 MFFamily Family2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2017 as allowed per King County OrdinanceElementary 0.1930 0.10303 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2017-2023Middle School 0.0770 0.03104 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2017-2023Senior High 0.0730 0.04405 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developmentsTotal 0.3430 0.1780Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 TotalLakeland/Kersey Single Family 0 100 150 75 50 29 404Lea Hill Area Single Family 50 75 50 30 0 0 0 205Other Single Family Units 40 60 50 20 0 0 0 170Total Single Family Units 90 235 250 125 50 29 0 779Projected Pupils:K-5 17 45 48 24 10 6 0 1506-8 7 18 19 10 4 2 0 609-12 7 17 18942057K-12 31 81 86 43 17 10 0267Multi Family Units 0 150 300 150 48 0 0 648Total Multi Family Units 0 150 300 150 48 0 0 648Projected Pupils:K-5 0 15 31 15 5 0 0 676-80595100209-12 0 7 13720029K-12 0 27 53 27 9 0 0115Total Housing Units 90 385 550 275 98 29 0 1427K-5 17 61 79 40 15 6 0 2176-8 7 23 29 14 5 2 0 809-12 7 24 31 16 6 2 0 85K-12 31 107 139 70 26 10 0383Cumulative Projection2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2417 78 157 197 211 217 2177 3058737880807 30627883858531 138 277 347 373 383 383Auburn FactorsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsTotalMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsTotalTotalSr. High PupilsElementary - Grades K -5Mid School - Grades 6 - 8Senior High - Grades 9 - 12Total46Page 232 of 436 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of averageGRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25Enroll. & LevelKDG 11617.67%1237 2 11 21 27 29 29 291 11767.77%1210 2 11 22 27 29 30 302 11827.81% 45.61%1300 2 11 22 27 29 30 303 11537.62%1317 2 11 21 26 28 29 294 11247.43%1237 2 10 21 26 28 28 285 11097.33%1199 2 10 20 25 27 28 286 10857.17%1152 2 10 20 25 27 27 277 10857.17% 21.51%1132 2 10 20 25 27 27 278 10857.17%1108 2 10 20 25 27 27 279 12338.15%1261 3 11 23 28 30 31 3110 12358.16% 32.88%1248 3 11 23 28 30 31 3111 12228.07%1318 2 11 22 28 30 31 3112 12878.50%1226 3 12 24 29 32 33 33Totals 15136100.00% Total 15945 31 138 277 347 373 383 383TABLE 6 year Historical Data3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade LevelGrade11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-176yr Ave %KDG 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1160.67 7.67%1 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1175.50 7.77%2 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1181.50 7.81%3 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1152.83 7.62%4 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1124.33 7.43%5 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1109.33 7.33%6 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1084.50 7.17%7 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1085.33 7.17%8 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1085.17 7.17%9 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1232.83 8.15%10 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1235.00 8.16%11 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1222.17 8.07%12 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1286.67 8.50%Totals 14363 14596 14971 15277 15663 15945 15135.83 100.00%% of change 1.62% 2.57% 2.04% 2.53% 1.80%change +/- 233 375 306 386 28247Page 233 of 436 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1268 1306 1344 1379 1410 1439 1467enrollees move to the next1 1210 1288 1326 1365 1399 1430 1460 1488grade level.2 1300 1231 1316 1355 1389 1420 1450 14783 1317 1319 1256 1342 1376 1407 1436 1465Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1347 1354 1294 1375 1405 1434 1463previous years number plus5 1199 1261 1377 1386 1320 1398 1427 1456K-5 7500 7716 7934 8086 8238 8470 8646 8817Current generation based on 6 1152 1203 1271 1388 1393 1323 1399 1428% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1171 1228 1298 1411 1412 1341 1417factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1147 1192 1251 1316 1425 1425 1353survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3392 3522 3691 3937 4120 4159 4166 4199history.9 1261 1295 1340 1389 1443 1505 1613 161310 1248 1265 1304 1353 1395 1446 1507 161411 1318 2 11 22 28 30 31 3112 1226 1224 1246 1290 1331 1372 1421 1481GR 9-12 5053 3785 3901 4053 4198 4354 4572 4739Total 15945 15023 15526 16075 16556 16983 17385 17756% of change -5.78% 3.35% 3.54% 2.99% 2.58% 2.37% 2.13%change +/- -922 503 549 481 427 402 371TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2022-23 2023-24model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1281 1331 1383 1430 1474 1516 1557 1575 1593enrollees move to the next1 1210 1292 1342 1395 1441 1485 1528 1569 1587 1605grade level.2 1300 1242 1331 1383 1430 1473 1516 1558 1576 15933 1317 1321 1270 1359 1406 1450 1492 1534 1552 1569Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1430 1472 1513 1531 1548previous years number plus5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1451 1492 1509 1526K-5 7500 7739 7994 8203 8420 8720 8975 9223 9328 9434Current generation based on 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 1445 1462 1478% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 1423 1440 1456factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 1355 1371 1386survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3392 3516 3680 3912 4090 4139 4162 4224 4272 4321history.9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 1566 1584 160210 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1471 1573 1591 160911 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 1460 1476 149312 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 1478 1494 1511GR 9-12 5053 5165 5170 5307 5441 5626 5871 6077 6146 6216Total 15945 16420 16844 17421 17951 18485 19009 19525 19746 19970% of change 2.98% 2.58% 3.43% 3.04% 2.97% 2.83% 2.71% 1.14% 1.14%change +/- 475 424 577 530 534 524 516 222 22448Page 234 of 436 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 2.94% 1.14%ND3.13Aby Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1191 1202 1224 1241enrollees move to the next1 1210 1288 1248 1262 1279 1292grade level.2 1300 1231 1316 1278 1286 1300 13123 1317 1319 1256 1342 1299 1303 1316 1327Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1347 1354 1294 1375 1328 1331 1343birth rate average plus5 1199 1261 1377 1386 1320 1398 1350 13537500 7639 7752 7786 7800 6621 5309 4024Current generation based on 6 1152 1203 1271 1388 1393 1323 1399 1351% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1171 1228 1298 1411 1412 1341 1417factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1147 1192 1251 1316 1425 1425 1353survival, based on 6 year3392 3522 3691 3937 4120 4159 4166 4122history.9 1261 1295 1340 1389 1443 1505 1613 161310 1248 1265 1304 1353 1395 1446 1507 161411 1318 1223 1245 1288 1330 1370 1419 147912 1226 1362 1273 1299 1335 1375 1413 14625053 5144 5162 5328 5504 5697 5952 6168Total 15945 16305 16605 17050 17424% of change 2.26% 1.84% 2.68% 2.19%change +/- 360 300 445 374TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6Aby Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1191 1202 1224 1241enrollees move to the next1 1210 1292 1252 1266 1283 1296grade level.2 1300 1242 1331 1293 1301 1315 13273 1317 1321 1270 1359 1316 1320 1333 1345Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1340 1343 1355birth rate average plus5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1361 13637500 7649 7775 7825 7854Current generation based on 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 1355% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 1423factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 1355survival, based on 6 year3392 3516 3680 3912 4090 4139 4162 4134history.9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 156610 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1171 157311 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 146012 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 14785053 5165 5170 5307 5441 5626 5571 6077Total 15945 16330 16625 17043 17385% of change 2.41% 1.81% 2.52% 2.00%change +/- 385 295 418 34249Page 235 of 436 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Page 236 of 436 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 2017SINGLE FAMILYUnits/CurrentTo BeDevelopment Name ParcelsOccupancyOccupiedElemMiddleHSTotalElemMiddleHSTotalAlicia Glenn 24 24 0 6 7 2 15 0.250 0.292 0.083 0.625Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)13 9 4 11020.111 0.111 0.000 0.222Bridges 386 279 107 46 23 20 89 0.165 0.082 0.072 0.319Canyon Creek 154 51 103 9 1 6 16 0.176 0.020 0.118 0.314Kendall Ridge 106 106 0 19 11 10 40 0.179 0.104 0.094 0.377Lakeland East: Portola 130 130 0 42 18 22 82 0.323 0.138 0.169 0.631Lakeland: Edgeview 373 373 0 55 12 13 80 0.147 0.032 0.035 0.214Lakeland Hills Estates 66 66 043180.061 0.045 0.015 0.121Lakeland: Villas At … 81 81 0 17 2 3 22 0.210 0.025 0.037 0.272Monterey Park 239 239 0 43 19 16 78 0.180 0.079 0.067 0.326Mountain View 55 43 12 10 4 2 16 0.233 0.093 0.047 0.372Sonata Hills 72 72 0 8 4 3 15 0.111 0.056 0.042 0.208Sterling Court 8 8 021360.250 0.125 0.375 0.750Trail Run 169 169 0 55 17 17 89 0.325 0.101 0.101 0.527Vintage Place 25 25 0 7 6 4 17 0.280 0.240 0.160 0.680Totals 1901 1675226324 129 122575 0.193 0.077 0.073 0.343Actual Students Student Generation Factors51Page 237 of 436 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 20172017 and beyondUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS TotalAnderson Acres 14 0 14 3 1 1 5Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 1 2Bridle Estates 18 0 18 3 1 1 6Hastings 10 * 10 0 10 2 1 1 3Hazel Heights 22 0 22 4 2 2 8Hazel View 20 0 20 4 2 1 7Lakeland: Forest Glen At .. 30 0 30 6 2 2 10Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 50 20 19 88Lakeland: River Rock 14 0 14 3 1 1 5Pacific Lane 11 0 11 2 1 1 4Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 20 8 8 36Spencer Place * 13 0 13 3 1 1 4Willow Place * 18 0 18 3 1 1 6Yates Plat 16 0 16 3 1 1 5553553 Total 107 43 40 190* currently under constructionStudent Generation FactorsEstimated Students Based on52Page 238 of 436 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 2017MULTI FAMILYUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS TotalLakeland: Four Lakes Apts234 234 0 15 6 11 32 0.064 0.026 0.047 0.137Legend Townhomes11 11 0 51170.455 0.091 0.091 0.636Trail Run Townhomes115 115 0 17 4 4 25 0.148 0.035 0.035 0.217360 360 0 37 11 16 64 0.103 0.031 0.044 0.1782017 and beyondPromenade Apts *(formerly Auburn Hills)320 0 320 33 10 14 57Sundallen Condos48 0 48 5129The Villas at Auburn *280 0 280 29 9 12 50648648Total67 20 29 115* currently under contructionStudent Generation Factors 53Page 239 of 436 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 Board Approved May 30, 2017 Page 240 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320-1781h Avenue East Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 (253) 862-2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Monte St. Johns Andy Hart Hilary McCabe John McKenna Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent Page 241 of 436 Dieringer Educating every child for Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow 3 Page 242 of 436 Dieringer School District No. 343 Dieringer School District An Overview Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School, provide K through 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northern two-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment is approximately 1,431 students in grades kindergarten through eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Lake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Construction has begun on an addition that is expected to be completed by September 2017. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998 and 2009, North Tapps Middle School houses students in grades sixth-eighth. The district supports an additional 550 high school students who may select to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend Auburn Riverside, Sumner and Bonney Lake High Schools. The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed of students who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. Parents are concerned with student success and provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School District. The PTA and many volunteers contribute countless hours and resources to our schools and students. The community supports the schools through the passage of funding issues to support bus acquisition, student access to cmTent technology and the construction of school facilities. Impact fees, including interest, are held in reserve until used to meet District identified needs for site acquisition, additional facilities and improvements and/or technology capital expenditures. Page 243 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Current Facilities Inventory of Public Schools NAME CAPACITY LOCATION *Lake Tapps Elementary 374 1320-178'h Ave E., Lake Tapps Dieringer Heights Elementary 495 21727 -34th St. E., Lake Tapps North Tapps Middle School 536 20029-l 21h St., E., Lake Tapps High School _Q TOTAL 1,405 *Include addition to be completed by 9/2017 Page 244 of 436 a ----; -= ---g ~ m ~ ____ :;_ -= ~ s e ; ; ; a s r: ------~ --:; a a :: ~ r: s :: '""' . ~1 11 1 ·1 " ,,____ l~ ,,,. C! . ,, , I ' ;~l • j O! _; ~~. '' I ~ 4 ,: ~ .~ifo/ f -,.. ; ieb?'t i ! 1 .• ,I .--a----·-· l--··· --2 -· -· -·-• ~" lb~T I I I I • , 1 IJt ~ '. ptwo ~ J l MUCl<LES(iDOT 1 fNOIAN " -• • r ••• • ••••• --~-,. •---•--•• ----• • • •••~~•-•-•• --~"'"''"·'''-•'•'••-•• ··-----• •-•-••• • --·-15 0\ "' .............. ·-.. --· ··------............. --...... -. ······-··-··--···-··-·-···. . -· .. ·-· - l\.n .. \-11111 . -··1· .. ........__ . -12='~"" 1~ u:y 1 ,.,· :· · Jti! .. n-· M • "i ·, • '"'-~-' 1;·-7--· .. ;-.,; .. ~.-.:1 ""~·;;;~ -~Jf'tf"_' \\ \ ~ ~'\-'l::.:':~!.i.;.:M\'3~m::c:r~1h!'lii»_iil'lw;r-1nrnTi£11;o;®rj\11~.;,;;/-~·i..\i'iWJ:-U\\ ,. ~Ila 1· iV:-\ ·:i.;_ ~::·., ... :·· r ' •: .-.vl1tt . ru ~ : lit"'-\~~\ 'r'~\ \\:.!tl\!.i.!'Ji:N:f.1~'.ojjj~i.ti\~t{lf.!:iiP'd.\. J11l' tiil.ttfr;'tifi'ffil.l~\IRtl.~'.il\-;'.1~.'YE.lil\JUJ:\ r 1 1 -~ ' 11 ----11~• ·~·= ~r.v;~=:·,;;.~~~-'i .1~;111"r~v' ~·--~.,.fi_ \_ .. \ .. V4f .. ~\'i-t'-..~~:\W~;1;1f~~,;~~-~\-;\'it$i\~t~~l.t\S\.{\.fiP1.\-l.~··\'1.~1-'nl'li'' -............ !'!{9" ..... I· ··(f. ·13-. --• 1140 !:·;: .. ;.:<· : .. ~ ... ".' _;; ~ ·:;~·'''i1-" -/"'" "'l~ "".!;'V' ; II '-... "~·\~:r{lf{!llilif~'l!\!lrun~Mll '\ l'r.lll.ll''~~"ii!!!~'t.~ • I a;, "" ....... :·::·. ~~·· • : • • • •• .-1 •• i;, •. 1.:. ,·. , _/ ...Ji .. ~ c.iuU.u .. ~, .. """i. ~ .. \..tJlt WZi:\\ ) i~.w.J.'iJil~_ .. ,_~v;;'M\l"'fi.'~~BJ\t\ n~!lt\1:.tgmx'r..t.'.¥.~~t~'.\!.\"':i.l\:.~'B&.'\ 1 w DIERINGERSCHOOLDISTRIOTN0.343 1·1"' ~ .. -!:..~; · • --~. ----'-'l't=--llo DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP -. . • I "'-•-' ' it~ J I ~.:!--W..T_O_rt_ •,·. 1 \ I C • ;:.\!'~. f :: •=rr&:rA .... rt r.q11mwoA .... ll' • f ) • , "'"j.J1 1.. ; I --</II !In Ulf f ...._.~~~";"'! loo'tJ:i?;~:"'I • --• ~Hei;Ms r.i-niwrSctm lbftT11?P2 lG!d• Ud'ttl Ill ~m~.:~: ~=.GJrf r ...... :_\!, ____ .,·n.t •. o\ • ..1 •• :--...r,<r..,__-~ .... -.....-.2·1.Y.~-~~1~\'c.."'~2M'1s:~;:;·~~li.~*t+'tt .... -2''3· .. --·-... ~ 1 -2<J.-· --~~11" SI ~Jm.1m !UIJ•ta= sc.1ieln1\:ltu1cmDa t 1 11 ,~vu.-w1,"!"".~ r :~~"!«~.;A"_;i,:m~-}.\~,:~wm;,.\\,-(:'~~~ ·"'"'\';~\ ~= 1 \In«" /J(6\\ _ llao "I. . ... .. .. 1 r. ' Cl)KnUlltpC',..1'""1·&'-.do t I ---I u l !I.. ...~ -.... i.... -_, --·+---...;.-+-;: .. -•'"-;<-<''"' ~uot ~ ~ ~ ; _; = ; = g: c: ~ ; ; = = ;;: ~ 5 a a e g o a Page 245 of 436 Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase May2017 Proposed Housing Units: Single Family-211 x .452 generation factor= 95 students K-8 Enrollment Impact: 95 students K-8 Estimated 19 students a year over the period 2018-2023 Potential enrollment increase = 6.6% (based on 1,420 enrollment 3/17) Increase per grade level= 10.5 students (based on 9 grade bands) Approximately students per school: LTES 31.5; NTMS 31.5; DHES 31.5 District enrollment based on 3/17 and potential growth =l,515 students District program capacity= 1,405 students Page 246 of 436 Enrollment Projections The Dieringer School District is located in an area that continues to experience growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data, proposed housing development, and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District continues to experience steady growth in student enrollment. This has slightly exceeded the Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed construction within the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and beyond. This growth trend was slowed in recent years by economic conditions, but has picked up again. There are 211 single family residents slated for construction within the next five years. These projects, together with individual lots and general in-migration, are anticipated to generate an additional 95 students in kindergarten through eighth grade. Information from Pierce county Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 additional housing lots in the western portion of the district. This creates a potential for 542 additional students, kindergarten through eighth grade that are not included in the above numbers. To partially address this growth, the District passed a 2006 bond issue to construct an additional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary. Those classrooms were completed and occupied in 2009. The bond issue also provided for the addition of an auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North Tapps Middle School. Those projects were completed in 2009 and the new instructional spaces are in use. This year a Growth and Facilities Task Force meet and identified the need to expand the Lake Tapps Elementary School. Construction of 3 classrooms began in the winter of2017 and will be completed by September, 2017. Page 247 of 436 HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS Spring 2017 #1 Fairweather Cove Estates (19) Pierce Co/8 houses completed -Notice of application 1124/01 -27 Single Family Lots -1600-2000 block of l 61h St. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy. #2 Rainier Plateau (IO) Pierce Co/ Site work completed; home construction TBD -Notice of application 10113100 -10 Single Family Lots -End of 34•h St. #3 Grandview Ridge II and III Pierce Co/ III (I) -OffSumner-Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr. -Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1113/99 -60 Single Family Lots #4 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (10) Pierce Co -One house completed -11 large lots; Across from Snag Island #5 Country Creek Estates (1) Pierce Co/ 9 houses completed -10 Single Family Lots; off 15 111 near Edwards Road #6 Forest Canyon Estates (121) Pierce Co/ Permit expired -121 Single Family Lots; off Forest Canyon Rd. #7 The Ridge at Lake Tapps (45) Pierce County -Preliminary plat process -45 Single Family Lots -32XX Sumner Tapps Hwy. E. #8 Maryanski Plat (4) Pierce County -Preliminary plat process -4 Single Family Lots; 40 111 St. E and 230 1h Ave E 211 Single Family Units to be built Page 248 of 436 Standard of Service The Dieringer School District houses children in elementary schools serving students kindergarten through fifth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. High school students, grades nine through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Auburn and Sumner School Districts. Dieringer School District follows a traditional school calendar beginning in early September and completing in mid June. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49 and 8:45 a.m. and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Dieringer School District standard of service is based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Based on the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom kindergarten through third grade 17, fourth through fifth and sixth grade 27 and seven through eighth grade 28. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes. In the District, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not counted as capacity classrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instruction, physical education and art instruction in separate, non-capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non-capacity spaces. Special education and remedial programs are provided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. Page 249 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Dieringer School District Service Standards Public School Facilities (Square Feet Per Student) Elementary School 138 Middle School 148 Junior High NA High School NA Dieringer School District Individual Capacity Projects (2018-2023) Elementary School No. 3 450 High School NA Page 250 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Name Current Capacity Lake Tapps Elementary 418 (L TES Replacement) Dieringer Heights Elem. 507 Elementary School No. 3 North Tapps MS Incl 536 NTMS Additions 2009 TOTALS 1461 *Reduced capacity due to 1-3 class sizes. PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS MASTER SCHEDULE May, 2017 6-Year Total Capacity Capacity 2018* 2019 374 495 450 450 536 450 1855 2020 2021 2022 2023 Page 251 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, May 2017 CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Reserve New Revenue: (x $1,000) Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments TOTAL SOURCES Uses of Funds Elementary School No. 3 L TES Remodel Non-Capacity Projects: School Site, Technology Upgrades, And Board Approved Projects TOTAL USES BALANCE $4,098 $26,191 $30,289 ($23,125) (2,243) (4,921) ($30,289) 0 Page 252 of 436 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 FINANCE PLAN 2018-2023 May, 2017 Permanent Capacity Projects Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source of Funds Estimated Estimated Amt Estimated ·impact Levy, Bond & State Impact Cost Lew, Bond State Match Fees Interest Match Fees Elementary School No. 3 23,125,000 23, 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 L TES Remodel 2,243,000 807,000 0 0 1,436,000 0 0 Total Capacity Projects 25,368,000 23,932,000 0 0 1,436,000 0 0 Non-Capacity Projects School Site Elem. No. 3 700,000 0 0 0 0 0 700,000 Technology Improvements 3,423,000 1,725,000 0 0 1,698,000 0 0 Board Approved Projects 798,000 493,000 0 41000 0 0 264,000 Total Non-Capacity Projects 4,921,000 2,218,000 0 41,000 1,698,000 0 964,000 TOTAL PROJECTS 30,289,000 26,150,000 0 41,000 3,134,000 0 964,000 Page 253 of 436 Time Period 2017 Actual 2017-2022 Growth Elementary Schools $53,220 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Capital Facilities Requirements to 2023 Student Population 1428 95 Student Capacity 1405 450 Net Reserve Or (Deficiency) (23) 355 Dieringer School District Cost Per Student Middle Schools $58,982 (2017 Dollars) Junior High Schools NA High Schools NA Page 254 of 436 Scho()l l111pact Fee C:;ilculati()n __ Sl17 · Dietirt er school Disttict J[)ISTRICT ... . g . . . .. -j_ __ _ Schoo_~ -~-~!~--~~-g~_i_~_i_!i~-~-f~.<?-~!_: _____ J ((AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)xStudent GenerationFactor - -···· ··-·····-----···---------.----:s1l!ciel1i ·-·-'student Facility -!cost/ : Facility Factor : Factor _ _ _;A_ ...• _._c_·._·:_r_._:e_ .• _.· 1 _0:_ 2 g_ •• ·_ 0 e_ 0 .:[·Ac,r_e_$-: :_ 4 ·_._. 1 . __ 9 _:_,:, __ .. _ 4 :_· 9 _ .. ·_'capacity'si'R MFR Elementary " > 450 >0,3?.2 > 0;172 Middle ---..... -. . . . . > << <>><<>>> < < <<< < < < 0:130 :; 0:070 TOTAL - -----t -----$3.596 School Construction Cost: ((F_acil_ityc;ost/Facility_Capacity)xS_tudent Generation Factor)x{perrnanent(Total_Sg Ft) __ _ <:::•:•:<• >•:•:•:•:::•:•:·Fac:ility <::Facility Elerne>ntary_Ng3; .:•::>:•····:•:•:••:_:::•:• . Capacity_ 450 !.~-~p~~-~-iy-~-~~-i-~!!Y __ ~~~~= --------------- Student Student Factor SFR 0.322 0.130 Factor MFR 0.172 0.070 'TOTAL --__ }16,54:iL $16.547 (JFacilityCost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor)x(Temporary/Total Sguare Feet) ·--···-· · ·· ··· · · -··-·------------' -· · -· · -· :st\Jcieni ------sil!cierit ·-· -cosi1 i:%'ierl'1[lf)FacilitY .. . .. Facility Factor Factor SFR Elementary __ Middle !Total SqHCost Size 'SFR :MFR < < / ~g .... > g -K7~8--__ --· ~:~;~: --iTOTAL State Matching Credit: ... ... . . -i _ Boeckh __ ln_d_ex_X SPl0'--l•uu1·e._1:';''''\Jhl".1X' District Match'3X Student Factor Ele_rne>ntgry .. Middle Index :student :student C_ost/ SFR _c;ost/ MFR $_1,923 $ l,923 $8,839 _ c;ost/ MFR Cost/ MFR i-~~--~~~~~~i·_~!-~-~-_ij_~~:-__ ------ $0 ------1---,,,,,:,..-""'-!--,....,,,,.,~ SFR MFR AveraQe_ASSE)SSE)d\(alu_e_20l_ 6 (;()pita! Bond lntere>st Rgtejes!L6fl5 . N etPrese _nt \( alue ol_f\VE)ra9E) D't{elling Prorierty T(lXLevy Rate . _ 2017 ___ , • -U········ $42 ~·'.f§ia :U$?9ij~~ • $3.530.710 $2,405.476 ··:•:•:•:::•::•::••:::•:•:::::ro:: :•:::•:•:::::•::: :fo _,_ __ __, ____ ~----+-: .............. $3.5.751•••··· ·······$~-~751••• Present Value of Revenue Stream $12.623 $8,600 -L ____ _ ______ _.Site Acquistion Costs ____ ,Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost 'State Match Credit 'Tax Payment Credit :FEE - FEE WITH DfaCOUNT OF 503 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 503 , Single N\Uliiple ' ........................... . .••. i Falllily ___ i ____ Family . : . J3,596}4 . }l,923.4 l ! _• _ $16A4J.22 ... $8,838.89 : $Q.OO · $0.00 • --$0,00 j(\00 ' . ·····-···· + _\.,, 2.622 64) -($8.599'.82) $7,521 $2,162 $3,760 $1,081 Page 255 of 436 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 Page 256 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Adopted July 25, 2017 BOARD OF EDUCATION Geoffery McAnalloy Claire Wilson Liz Drake Carol Gregory Hiroshi Eto SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster Page 257 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 10 Map - Elementary Boundaries 11 Map - Middle School Boundaries 12 Map - High School Boundaries 13 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 14 Building Capacities 15-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 PLAN 31-33 Page 258 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2018 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2017. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Construction to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students has been in progress since 2014. We are currently nearing the completion of this $106 million project. The District began Phase I in Summer 2014. The newly constructed building, including the majority of the classrooms (Phase II), was ready for use beginning in the 2016-17 school year. The existing cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during construction. Phase III, demolition of the cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen, and construction of athletic fields, will begin this summer and is expected to be completed by Winter 2018. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State continues to phase in funding based on a reduction of K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would further reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3, 22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. Page 259 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a Facilities Planning Committee consisting of District staff, parents, and community members. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District’s plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. Through the committee’s work a determination was made to recommend the rebuilding of Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee is also recommending the modernization of Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuild of the aforementioned schools will create additional capacity for 960 students at the elementaries and 200 students at the high school. The expanded capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2017-18 school year. Page 260 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. Page 261 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAFA @ Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Page 262 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown Square 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. Page 263 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- going Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Capital bond request III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Increased capacity at the five elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. Page 264 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. Page 265 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 9Six Year Finance PlanSecured FundingSourcesImpact Fees (1)($308,593)Land Sale Funds (2)($4,468,978)Bond or Levy Funds (3) $7,599,847School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (4) $10,549,488TOTAL $13,371,764Projected RevenueSourcesSchool Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (5) $116,000,000Levy Funds (6) $20,000,000Bond Funds (7) $304,000,000Land Fund Sales (8) $0Impact Fees (9) $1,400,000TOTAL $441,400,000Actual and Planned ExpendituresTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $454,771,764NEW SCHOOLS Estimated and Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Total CostPrior Years 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2017-2023MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSIONFederal Way High School (10)$76,000,000$20,000,000 $10,000,000$30,000,000$106,000,000Lake Grove Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Mirror Lake Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Star Lake Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Wildwood Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Olympic View K-8 School (11) $14,700,000 $14,700,000 $14,700,000 $44,100,000$44,100,000Thomas Jefferson High School (11) $37,500,000 $37,500,000 $37,500,000 $37,000,000 $149,500,000$149,500,000SITE ACQUISITIONNorman Center $1,425,000$225,000 $235,000 $235,000 $695,000$2,120,000 (Employment Transtion Program) (12)TEMPORARY FACILITIESPortables (13) $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,400,000$1,400,000TOTAL $77,425,000 $75,625,000 $80,335,000 $15,135,000 $52,400,000 $37,700,000 $37,700,000 $37,200,000 $336,095,000 $413,520,000NOTES:`1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/16. 2. This is year end balance on 12/31/16.3. This is the 12/31/16 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings.4. This represents the balance of SCAP which will be used to to support the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. This is the balance on 12/31/16.5. This is remaining anticipated SCAP for the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. Application for funds was made in July 2013. Also included is the anticipated SCAP for projects included in the upcoming bond measure.6. These include $30m of the $60m six-year levy approved in November 2012.7. In November 2017, the District will have a $450m bond measure on the ballot for voter consideration. The amount included in the finance plan is for those projuects which will create additional capacity.8. Projected sale of surplus properties.9. These are projected fees based upon anticipated residential developments in the District, $25,000 per month over the next 6 years.10. Project budget has been adjusted to match current project cost estimates.11. Project budgets based on current cost estimates.12. Norman Center was purchased in 2010 to house the Employment Transition Program. The $2.1m purchase has been financed through a state approved LOCAL program through 2020.13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary.Page 266 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and two small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAFA @ Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Page 267 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 Page 268 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 Page 269 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 Page 270 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2018 through 2024 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units Page 271 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with McCleary. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, with the implementation of McCleary which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 20 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 20 17 25-28 Grade 3 25 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. Page 272 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (4 elementary & 3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites. The District has recently leased space to expand or possibly relocate existing preschool programs. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. Page 273 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 17 ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 353 Illahee 855 864 Brigadoon 299 Kilo 779 787 Camelot 277 Lakota 786 794 Enterprise 345 Sacajawea 694 701 Green Gables 401 Sequoyah 585 591 Lake Dolloff 400 Totem 795 803 Lake Grove 353 TAFA @ Saghalie 598 604 Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 183 185 Mark Twain 430 TOTAL 5,275 5,329 Meredith Hill 375 Mirror Lake 262 *Middle School Average 727 735 Nautilus (K-8)466 Olympic View 353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Panther Lake 347 PROGRAM CAPACITY Rainier View 405 Sherwood Forest 390 School Name Headcount FTE Silver Lake 400 Decatur 1243 1,329 Star Lake 337 Federal Way 1684 1,801 Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 1,309 Twin Lakes 341 Todd Beamer 1085 1,160 Valhalla 406 TAFA @ Saghalie 155 166 Wildwood 372 Career Academy at Truman 159 170 Woodmont (K-8)357 Federal Way Public Academy 116 124 TOTAL 8,445 Employment Transition Program 48 51 TOTAL 5,714 6,111 Elementary Average 367 *High School Average 1,309 1,400 Notes: * Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Truman High School, Employment Transition Program and TAFA @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. Page 274 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. Page 275 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL* INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 12Decatur 81 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Enterprise 21Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1TOTAL 26 1 Lake Dolloff 11 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 1 2 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 6 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 12 Olympic View 11MOT Panther Lake 31TDC 9 Rainier View 41Former TAFA 20 Sherwood Forest 31TOTAL 29 Silver Lake 13 Star Lake 31 Sunnycrest 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 49 26 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 3 Kilo 7 Lakota Sacajawea 3 Sequoyah 2 Totem TAFA @ Saghalie 4 TOTAL 5 14 *Non-instructional portables at Lake Dolloff, Mirror Lake, and Nautilus will be in use as Instructional portables in the 2017-18 school year. PORTABLE LOCATIONS Page 276 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20 Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of Page 277 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2023. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. An update to the District projections was provided in December 2016. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. Page 278 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount; High School FTE = .935Headcount) Total K -12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School FTE Change 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -0.7% 2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6,354 20,384 0.7% 2015 2014-15 9,177 4,884 6,402 20,462 0.4% 2016 2015-16 9,397 5,047 6,273 20,717 1.2% 2017 2016-17 9,589 4,986 6,063 20,638 -0.4% 2018 B2017-18 9,748 5,105 6,063 20,916 1.3% 2019 P2018-19 9,621 5,166 6,178 20,965 0.2% 2020 P2019-20 9,561 5,422 6,149 21,132 0.8% 2021 P2020-21 9,615 5,496 6,209 21,320 0.9% 2022 P2021-22 9,725 5,421 6,359 21,505 0.9% 2023 P2022-23 9,806 5,294 6,548 21,648 0.7% 2024 P2023-24 9,880 5,270 6,689 21,839 0.9% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 School Year Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast FTE Page 279 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23 Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. Page 280 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 24 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,451 19,451 19,451 19,451 20,091 20,251 20,251 FTE CAPACITY 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 Add Capacity 640 160 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,451 19,451 19,451 20,091 20,251 20,251 20,251 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 19,822 19,822 19,822 20,462 19,982 19,822 19,822 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,916 20,965 21,132 21,320 21,505 21,648 21,839 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE)(315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,601 20,650 20,817 21,005 21,190 21,333 21,524 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (779) (828) (995) (543) (1,208) (1,511) (1,702) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,129 2,171 2,171 2,171 1,898 1,877 1,877 Add New Portable Capacity 42 Subtract Portable Capacity (273) (21) Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,171 2,171 2,171 1,898 1,877 1,877 1,877 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,392 1,343 1,176 1,355 669 366 175 Page 281 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 25 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 FTE CAPACITY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 Add/Subtract capacity total Add capacity at: Lake Grove 160 Mirror Lake 205 Olympic View 160 Star Lake 145 Wildwood 130 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 9,262 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 9,262 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,748 9,621 9,561 9,615 9,725 9,806 9,880 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,712 9,585 9,525 9,579 9,689 9,770 9,844 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,250) (1,123) (1,063) (477) (427) (508) (582) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 1,029 1,071 1,071 1,071 798 777 777 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at: Nautilus 42 Subtract portable capacity at: Mirror Lake (126) Olympic View (21) Star Lake (63) Wildwood (84) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,071 1,071 1,071 798 777 777 777 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY (179) (52)8 321 350 269 195 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. Page 282 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 26 CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 FTE CAPACITY 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 Add/Subtract capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,105 5,166 5,422 5,496 5,421 5,294 5,270 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,031 5,092 5,348 5,422 5,347 5,220 5,196 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 218 157 (99) (173) (98)29 53 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 543 482 226 152 227 354 378 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. Page 283 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 27 CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 FTE CAPACITY 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 Add/Subtract capacity Thomas Jefferson High School4 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,063 6,178 6,149 6,209 6,359 6,548 6,689 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 5,858 5,973 5,944 6,004 6,154 6,343 6,484 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 253 138 167 107 (43) (232) (373) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 775 775 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 775 775 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 1,028 913 942 882 732 543 402 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 4 Current project timelines estimate the completion of Thomas Jefferson HS in 2024. Page 284 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2017 Plan Year 2018 Single Family Units $3,198 $6,842 Multi-Family Units $8,386 $20,086 Mixed-Use Residential1 $4,193 $10,043 A year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. Page 285 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 29 STUDENT GENERATIONNEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARSSingle Family Student GenerationNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalSingle Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(17) Hibbford Glen 15 10 2 1 0.6667 0.1333 0.0667 0.8667(17) Vista Pointe 105 16 2 7 0.1524 0.0190 0.0667 0.2381(16) Jefferson Place 11 5 1 1 0.4545 0.0909 0.0909 0.6363(16) Star Lake East 30 3 4 5 0.1000 0.1333 0.1667 0.4000(15) Swan Song 29 7 2 3 0.2414 0.0690 0.1034 0.4138(15) Wynstone East 114 30 21 26 0.2632 0.1842 0.2281 0.6755(14) North Lake Rim 37 4 4 4 0.1081 0.1081 0.1081 0.3243(14) Wynstone 44 13 6 7 0.2955 0.1364 0.1591 0.5910(13) Lake Point 22 3 4 5 0.1364 0.1818 0.2273 0.5455(13) Saghalie Firs 34 6 7 4 0.1765 0.2059 0.1176 0.5000Total441 97 53 63Student Generation*0.2200 0.1202 0.1429 0.4830Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal WayNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalMulti Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(17) Kitt's Corner 216 138 48 54 0.6389 0.2222 0.2500 1.1111(16) Kandila Townhomes 27 3 2 3 0.1111 0.0741 0.1111 0.2963(15) Park 16 293 179 77 116 0.6109 0.2628 0.3959 1.2696Total536 320 127 173Student Generation*0.5970 0.2369 0.3228 1.1567 * Student Generation rate is based on totals.Page 286 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost:Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.2200 0.5970 $0 $0 Middle School 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 4.85 $216,718 51 0.1429 0.3228 $2,942 $6,646 TOTAL $2,942 $6,646 School Construction Cost:Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 94.09% $38,934,000 800 0.2200 0.5970 $10,074 $27,337 Middle School 97.26% 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 96.98% $9,867,000 150 0.1429 0.3228 $9,116 $20,593 TO TAL $19,190 $47,930 Temporary Facility Cost:Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.91% $172,993 42 0.2200 0.5970 $54 $145 Middle School 2.74% 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 3.02% 0.1429 0.3228 $0 $0 TOTAL $54 $145 State Matching Credit Calculation:Student Student Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $213.23 90 65.59% 0.2200 0.5970 $2,769 $7,515 Middle School $213.23 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School $213.23 130 65.59% 0.1429 0.3228 $2,598 $5,869 Total $5,367 $13,384 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2017) $294,328 $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2017) 3.95% 3.95% Net Present Value of Av erage Dwelling $2,393,217 $890,268 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.31 $1.31 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,135 $1,166 Sing le Family Multi-Family Mixed-Use Residences Residences Residential 1 Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $2,942 6,646$ 6,646$ Permanent Facility Cost $19,190 47,930$ 47,930$ Temporary Facility Cost $54 145$ 145$ State Match Credit (5,367)$ (13,384)$ (13,384)$ Tax Payment Credit (3,135)$ (1,166)$ (1,166)$ Sub-Total 13,683$ 40,171$ 40,171$ 50% Local Share 6,842$ 20,086$ 20,086$ Calculated Impact Fee 6,842$ 20,086$ 10,043$ 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 Page 287 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2017 Plan and the 2018 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2018-2024 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule and anticipated new construction based on a November 2017 bond vote. The plan is found on page 9. SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2018 through 2024 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and 33. Page 288 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 32 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on the estimate for replacing Thomas Jefferson High is $149,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of $89,700,000, which is 60% of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 200 additional seats, with 50 seats dedicated for preschool capacity. Only additional capacity for grade 9-12 seats will be used in the impact fee calculation. The current permanent capacity of Thomas Jefferson High is 1309. The addition of 150 grade 9-12 seats will increase permanent capacity by 11%. Total Cost $149,500,000 x .6 x .11 = $9,867,000 The anticipated cost based on the estimate for replacing Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood elementaries is $154,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of $92,700,000, which is 60% of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 960 additional seats. The additional seats will include new preschool capacity at Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, and Star Lake and 6-8 capacity at Olympic View, as well as adding additional K-5 capacity. Only capacity for grade K-5 seats will be used in the impact fee calculation. The current permanent capacity of these schools is 1902. The addition of 800 grade K-5 seats will increase permanent capacity by 42%. Total Cost $154,500,000 x .6 x .42 = $38,934,000 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. Total Cost $2,100,000 / 2 = $1,050,000 Cost per Acre $1,050,000 / 4.85 = $216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. Page 289 of 436 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 33 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.30% to 95.86%Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.70% to 4.14%Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $178,686 to $172,993 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $213.23 to $213.23 Change effective July 2016 State Match 65.59% to 65.59%Change effective July 2016 Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $274,781 to $294,328 Service District (ESD 121) MFR- $106,352 to $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.27% to 3.95%Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.37 to $1.31 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Elementary .2471 to .2200 Middle School .1408 to .1202 High School .1379 to .1429 Multi-Family - Elementary .5375 to .5970 Middle School .2813 to .2369 High School .2594 to .3228 Impact Fee SFR- $3,198 to $6,842 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR - $8,386 to $20,086 MFR based on the updated calculation Note: Student generation factors for are single family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Student generation factors for are multi- family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Page 290 of 436 Federal Way Public Schools 33330 8th Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2017 Page 291 of 436 Page 292 of 436 Page 293 of 436 Page 294 of 436 Page 295 of 436 Page 296 of 436 Page 297 of 436 Page 298 of 436 Page 299 of 436 Page 300 of 436 Page 301 of 436 Page 302 of 436 Page 303 of 436 Page 304 of 436 Page 305 of 436 Page 306 of 436 Page 307 of 436 Page 308 of 436 Page 309 of 436 Page 310 of 436 Page 311 of 436 Page 312 of 436 Page 313 of 436 Page 314 of 436 Page 315 of 436 Page 316 of 436 Page 317 of 436 Page 318 of 436 Page 319 of 436 Page 320 of 436 Page 321 of 436 Page 322 of 436 Page 323 of 436 Page 324 of 436 Page 325 of 436 Page 326 of 436 Page 327 of 436 Page 328 of 436 Page 329 of 436 Page 330 of 436 Page 331 of 436 Page 332 of 436 Page 333 of 436 Page 334 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6668 (Snyder) Date: December 11, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: Agenda Bill for Ordinance No. 6668 Ordinance No. 6668 Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6668. Background Summary: See the attached agenda bill. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Other: Legal & Planning Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:ORD.B Page 335 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: ZOA17-0007; Ordinance # 6668 to revise school district impact fees for year 2018 Date: November 28, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Dept. Attachments: Ordinance No. 6668 Budget Impact: (none) Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6668 to revise school impact fees for 2018. Background Summary: Title 19 (Impact Fees) of the Auburn City Code contains standards and regulations pertaining to the collection of impact fees in the City of Auburn. Specifically, Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) addresses the establishment, calculation, collection and amendment of school impact fees within the municipal boundaries of the City of Auburn. The city originally established school impact fees in 1998 by Ordinance No. 5078. Portions of four school districts occur within the City limits. Pursuant to Code Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code, on at least an annual basis, the Auburn City Council shall review the information submitted by the Districts pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. The City Council may also at this time determin e if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary. The City of Auburn Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment process for 2017 included requests for City approval of the Capital Facilities Plans of the four districts as follows: * 2017 - 2023 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan; * 2018-2023 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan; * 2018 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan; and * 2017-2018 through 2022-2023 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan. These requests were submitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.02.050 (Submission of District Capital Facilities Plan and Data) of the Auburn City Code. The School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans are contained in the work ing notebooks (three-ring binders) for the 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, distributed to the City Council prior to the 11-27- 17 study session. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Snyder Meeting Date: December 4, 2017 Item Number: Page 336 of 436 Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6668 related to adjusting School Impact Fees Date: November 28, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Definition The city’s code section 19.02 contains the city’s regulations governing school impact fees. It provides the following definition: "Impact fee" means a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for school facilities needed to serve new growth and development that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the school facilities, and that is used for such facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. Related Authority Other key points of the city’s regulations include:  The impact fee shall be based on a capital facilities plan adopted by the school district and incorporated by reference by the city as part of the capital facilities element of the city's comprehensive plan, adopted pursuant to Chapter 36.70A RCW, for the purpose of establishing the fee program.  Separate fees shall be calculated for single-family and multifamily types of dwelling units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the district for each type of dwelling unit.  The fee shall be calculated on a district-wide basis using the appropriate factors and data supplied by the district. The fee calculations shall also be made on a district -wide basis to assure maximum utilization of all available school facilities in the district which meet district standards.  As a condition of the city's authorization and adoption of a school impact fee ordinance, the city and the applicable district shall enter into an interlocal agreement governing the operation of the school impact fee program, and describing the relationship and liabilities of the parties. The agreement must provide that the district shall hold the city harmless for all damages.  On an annual basis (by July 1st or on a date agreed to by district and the city and stipulated in the interlocal agreement), any district for which the city is collecting impact fees shall submit the Capital facilities plan and supporting information t o the city.  Applicants for single-family and multifamily residential building permits shall pay the total amount of the impact fees assessed before the building permit is issued, using the impact fee schedules in effect, unless the fee has been deferred pursuant to City Ordinance No. 6341.  The impact fee calculation shall be based upon the formula set forth in ACC 19.02.110, “Impact fee formula”. The formula is the city's determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Based on this formula, the “Fee Obligation” is the “T otal Unfunded Need” x 50% = Fee Calculation. The Capital Facilities Plans that were approved by each of the school boards contain proposed school impact fees for each of the Districts. The requests for adjustment of the school impact fees are required to be submitted concurrent with the submittal of the Capital Facilities Plans. Under City regulations a separate letter request is only required to be submitted to the city when the fee adjustment is requested to increase. Page 337 of 436 Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6668 related to adjusting School Impact Fees Date: November 28, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Council Review and Decision The establishment of the actual fees occurs through separate Council action amending Chapter 19.02 of the Auburn City Code. Section 19.02.060, (Annual Council Review) specifies the following: “On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the i nformation submitted by the district pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. The city council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary; provided, that any school impact fee adjustment that would increase the school impact fee shall require the submittal of a written request for the adjustment by the applicable school district concurrent with the submittal of the annual capital facilities plan pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. In making its decision to adjust impact fees, the city council will take into consideration the quality and completeness of the information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan.” Section 19.02.060 establishes that the Auburn City Council is not obligated to accept the fees proposed by the School Districts within their submitted Capital Facilities Plans and may establish fees that the Council determines are more appropriate and consistent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitigating school impacts within the affected portion of the City. Recommendation (Contained in draft Ordinance No. 6668) Auburn School District: The Auburn School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan, that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for the year 2018. The year 2018 for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,321.86, a decrease of $2,147.51 and the requested fee for multiple - family dwellings is $2,081.29, an increase of $441.59. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Dieringer School District: The Dieringer School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for year 2018. The year 2018 fees for single-family dwellings as identified in the CFP is proposed to be $3,760.00, an increase of $360.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,081.00; a decrease of $678.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. While, a proposed fee calculation of $3,760.00 for single family residential and $1,081.00 for multiple family residential is identified based on their Capital Facilities Plan, related to this, the Pierce County Council by Ordinance No. 2017-78 adopted November 7, 2017; effective January 1, 2018, establishing a school impact fee for the Dieringer School District of $3,485.00 for single family residential and $1,081.00 for multiple family residential (See Exhibit). Pierce County routinely establishes a uniform rate for all districts within their jurisdiction and only makes yearly adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. The Dieringer School District is the only school district common to both the jurisdictions of the City of Auburn and Pierce County. It appears appropriate to establish a fee applicable in the City of Auburn for the Dieringer School district that is the same as the fee implemented in Pierce County’s fee since it is more appropriate and consistent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitigating school impacts within the affected portion of the City. The draft Ordinance No. 6668 has been prepared to reflect school impact fees that are the same as Pierce County’s school impact fee and differs from what the Dieringer School District has requested, as historically has been done. Page 338 of 436 Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6668 related to adjusting School Impact Fees Date: November 28, 2017 Page 4 of 4 Federal Way School District: The Federal Way School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for year 2018. The year 2018 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,842.00, representing an increase of $3,644.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,086.00, an increase of $11,700.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. According to communication from Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster of the Federal Way Public Schools, there are several factors which have driven the multiple family impact fees to increase quite significantly in this plan. One factor is an increase in observed multiple-family student generation rates. When calculating the impact fees for their capital facilities plan, the District can only use actual student generation rates, either based on district or the King County average. Prior to 2016, there had been no multi-family developments in our District, so we were using the King County average. In 2015, the first of three multi-family developments was opened and fully occupied in the City of Federal Way. The second was opened and occupied in late 2016 and the third was opened in fully occupied in summer of 2017. The first two developments have been included in the generation rate calculation for this plan. The specific generation rates can be found on Page 29. These multiple-family complexes are generating more than one student per unit which is significantly higher than past developments within the School District. In addition to the high student generation rates, the District completed work with its Facilities Planning Committee which determined a need for additional capacity at a number of schools. As a result of this work, Phase II of the District’s plan will be placed on the November ballot for a bond request. The facilities impacted during Phase II can be found on Page 7 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Anticipated funding for this project can be found on the Six-Year Finance Plan on Page 9. The Finance Plan outlines the anticipated timeline for beginning and completion of the various projects. It is important to note that not all projects within Phase II will create additional capacity. Only costs associated with increasing needed capacity are used in the formula for calculating Impact Fees. The specific cost calculations are outlined on Page 32 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District The Kent School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for year 2018. The year 2018 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $2,267.00, representing an increase of $57.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $5,235.00, an increase of $135.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Scheduling of Actions A review and discussion of the School District Capital Facilities Plans school impact fee changes and Ordinance No. 6668 was held by City Council at the Study Session November 27, 2017. City Council consideration is planned for December 4, 2017. Page 339 of 436 ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 6 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 AND 19.02.140 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACTS FEES WHEREAS, the Ciry of Auburn has adopted a school impact fee ordinance and collects school impact fees on behalf of certain school districts located or located in part within the City of Auburn; and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District, Dieringer School District, Federal Way School District, and 4he Kent School District, each being located in p.art within the City of Aubum, have provided the City of Auburn with updated capital facilities plans to be considered during the City's 2017 annual comprehensive plan amendment process that addresses among other things, the appropriate school impact fee for single family residential dwellings and multi-famify residential dwellings for each district; and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District issued a Determination of Non- Signifcance for the 2017 - 2023 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan June 9, 2017; the Dieringer School District issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the 2018-2023 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan May 16, 2017; the Federal Way School District issued a Determina4ion of Non-Significance for the 2018 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan May 12, 2017; and the Kent School District. issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 2017-2018 through 2022-2023 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan May 9, 2017; and Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 1 of 7 Page 340 of 436 V1/HEREAS the City of Auburn issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on September 19, 2017 for the City of Auburn Year 2017 city-initiated comprehensive plan map and text amendments (File No. SEP17-0014), and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 18, 2017 and November 1, 2017 conducted p.ublic he.arings on the proposed Aubum School District 2017-2023 Capital Facilities Plan, the proposed Dieringer School District 2048 - 2023 Capital Facilities Plan; the proposed Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan; and for the proposed Kent School District 2017-2018 through 2022-2023 Capital Facilifies Plan; and WHEREAS, following the conclus.ion of the public hearing on October 18, 201] and November 1, 2017, and subseque t deliberations, the Auburn Planning Commission, following individual positive motions, made separate recommenda4ions to the Auburn City Council on the approval of the Auburn School District 20172023 Gapital Facili4ies Plan, the Dieringer School District 2018 - 2023 Capital Facilities Plan; the Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan; and for the Kent School Disfrict 2017-2018 through 2022-2023 Capital Fac'ilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the Aubum City Council reviewed the recommendations of the Auburn Planning Commission on the school district capital facilities plans at a regularly scheduled study session on November 27; 2017; and WHEREAS, the Aubum City Council considered the recommendations ofi the Auburn Planning Commission on the capital facilities plans at a regularly scheduled Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 2 of 7 Page 341 of 436 meeting on December 4, 2017, and a positive motion approved the Auburn School District 2017-2023 Capital Facilities Plan, the Dieringer School District 2018 - 2023 Capital Facilifies Plan; fhe Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan; and for the Kent School District 2017-2018 through 2022-2023 Capital Facilities (Ordinance No. 6667); and WHEREAS, on November 27, 2017 the Aubum City Council at a regularly scheduled study session reviewed amendments to Title 19 (Impact Fees) and more specifically, Chapter 19.02 (Scho.ol Impact Fees) p.ertaining to school impact fees for single family residential dwelling units and multi-family dwelling units to be applied in the City of Aubum for the Aubum School District; Dieringer School District, Federal Way School District, and the Kent School District; respectively, based on the afqrementioned capital facili4ies plans for each of these disfricts; and WHEREA6, the Auburn City Code provides for adjustmeMs to school impact fees based on a review of the capital facilities plans for each of the districts; and WHEREAS, Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code specifies that the Au6um City Council will in making its decision to adjust impact fees take into consideration 4he quality and completeness of the informa4ion provided in the applicable sehool district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to the City Code. Sec4ion 19.02.115 of the Aubu n City Gode is hereby amended to read as follows. Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 3 of 7 Page 342 of 436 19.02.115 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Dieringer School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule below is based upon a review of fhe impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in fhe most recsnt version of fhe Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Aubum comprehensive pian. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school cap'ital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. EffectiVe January 1, 2018, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, fhe school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $3;498-A8 3 485.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $;-7-59:88 1 081.00 Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 1, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 1, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 1, 2012; Ord. 6393§ 1, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 1, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 1; 2009; Ord. 6214 § 1, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 1, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 1, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 2; 2005.) Section 2. Amendment to the Gity Code. Section 19.02.120 of the Aubum City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.120 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Aubum School District. fhe impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences a.nd for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Auburn School DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of fhe Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. OrcJinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 4 of 7 Page 343 of 436 Effective January 1, 2018, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit 3 3$ , 21.86 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit 9 2 081.29 Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 2, 2016; Ord.. 6542 § 2, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 2, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 2, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 2, 2010; Ord, 6279 § 2, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 2, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 2, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 2, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5793 1, 2003; Ord. 5232 § 1, 1999.) Section 3. AmendmeM to the City Code. Section 19.02.130 of the Aubum City Code is here.by amended as follows: 19.02.130 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Kent School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in 4he most recent version of the Kent School DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of 4he Aubum comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on 4he factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2018, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $A:89 5 235.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit Q','o 2 267.00 Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 3, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 3, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 3, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 3, 2012; Orii. 6393 § 3, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011 Ord. 6340 § 3, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 3, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 3, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 3, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 3, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5233 1, 1999.) Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 5 of 7 Page 344 of 436 Section 4. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.140 of #he Aubum City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.140 Impact fee calculation and schedule for 4he Federal Way School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a rediew of the impact fee and calcula4ion for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Federal Way School District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Aubum city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the dete mination of tlie appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on fhe factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2018, or tlie effectiVe date of this ordinance vuhichever is later, fhe school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit$3 9:8A$$6,842.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $8$20,086.00 Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 4, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 4, 2014; qrd. 6488 § 4, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 4, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 4, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 4, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 4, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 4, 2008; O cl. 6134 § 4, 2007; Orii. 6060 § 4, 2006; Ord. 6042 § 1, 2006.) Section 5. Constitutionality and Invaiidity. If any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a sepa ate, distinct and independent proVision, and such holding shall not affect tfie. yalidity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 6 of 7 Page 345 of 436 Section 6. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or fhe validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 7. Implerimentation, The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 8. Effec4ive Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: CITY OF AUBURN ATTEST: NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR banielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APP S TO FORM: iel B. H ' , ity Attomey --__ Published: Ordinance No. 6668 November 16, 2017 Page 7 of 7 Page 346 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5323 (Snyder) Date: December 13, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Res olution No. 5323 Amendment No. 4 Exis ting Agreement and Amendments 1 through 3 Budget Impact: $29,471.00 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5323. Background Summary: Resolution No. 5323, authorizes the Mayor to execute a 4th Amendment to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement between the City of Auburn, King County and the Pierce County Transit Benefit Authority (Pierce Transit). I n 2008, the City entered into the original agreement to provide f or additional transit service within the City and in 2010 implemented the Lakeland Hills-Auburn Sounder Station Shuttle Service (Route 497). I n September of 2017, Sound Transit added an additional train service on weekdays to both the morning and evening commute periods to and f rom Seattle, respectively. Amendment #4 to the Agreement provides f or increased shuttle service on Route 497 to meet these additional weekday trains. If the Agreement is approved, the additional service is anticipated to begin by January 8, 2018. The Agreement splits the costs of the Route 497 shuttle service three ways between the City, King County Metro, and Pierce Transit. The additional costs to the City to provide this additional service f or 2018 is $29,472.00. This will require a future 2018 budget amendment to fund and f unding is available within the 102 Arterial Street Fund. I n 2016, the annual ridership of Route 497 was at 67,250 boardings. Through October of 2017 the annual ridership was already at 65,372 boardings and is anticipated to continue growing. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:RES.A Page 347 of 436 Page 348 of 436 RESOLUTION iVO. 5 3 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNGIL OF THE C1TY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTOiV, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSIT SERVICE DIRECT FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING COUNTY AND PIERCE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT BENEFIT AUTHORITY (PIERCE TRANSIT) WHEREAS, on December 22, 2008 the City of Auburn, King County, and Pierce County Public Transit Benefit Authority entered into a Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement (the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, The agreement has been amended three times to extend the service beyond the expiration date in the original agreement; and WHEREAS, the third amendment extends service until February 9, 2020; and WHEREAS, Sound Transit has increased the Sounder train service to accommodate additional rider demand; and WHEREAS, Parking at Auburn Station is no longer adequate to meet demand from commuters; and WHEREAS, the 4th amendment will provide two additional transit trips between Lakeland Hills and Auburn Station to meet the additional Sounder train service, which will help to mitigate parking issues in downtown Auburn associated with the Station, and Section 8 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended or modified by written agreement of the Parties, and further provides that such amendments and modifications may be made for Resolution No. 5323 December 13, 2017 Page 1 of 2 Page 349 of 436 the County by Metro's General Manager when such amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, HEREBY RESOLVES as foilows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a 4th amendment to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement between the City of Auburn and King County, which amendment shall be in substantial conformity with the amendment attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this day of 2017. CITY OF AUBURN ATTEST: NANCY BAGKUS, MAYOR Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel . Hei , City Attorney Resolution No. 5323 December 13, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Page 350 of 436 Exhibit A _________________________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT NO. 4 to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement between King County, City of Auburn and Pierce Transit Page 1 of 3 AMENDMENT No. 4 to the TRANSIT SERVICE DIRECT FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT between KING COUNTY and THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON and PIERCE TRANSIT This Amendment No. 4 to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement ("Amendment No. 4" or the " Fourth Amendment") is made by and between King County, a home rule charter county of the State of Washington, by and through its Department of Transportation, Metro Transit Division (hereinafter the “County” or “Metro Transit”) and the City of Auburn (the “City”) and the Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Authority (“Pierce Transit”), both Washington municipal corporations (referred to collectively as “Service Partner,” whether one entity or multiple entities), all of which entities may be referred to hereinafter separately as “Party” or together as “Parties.” WHEREAS, on December 22, 2008 the Parties entered into a Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Section 4.1 of the Agreement provides that each service specified in Attachment A to the Agreement will expire five (5) years after the start of service , unless extended pursuant to the terms of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 4.1 of the Agreement further provides that if, after five (5) years the enhanced transit service described in Section 1 of Attachment A to the Agreement is deemed viable by the County pursuant to the performance indicators set forth in Section 2.2 of the Agreement and the additional performance benchmarks specified in Attachment A of the Agreement, and the Parties desire to have Pierce Transit continue to provide the enhanced transit service beyond the initial period, the Agreement may be extended by the Parties; and WHEREAS, the transit service enhancements provided for in Part I of Attachment A in the Agreement were implemented on or about February 9, 2010; and WHEREAS, in December 2014 the Parties extended the Agreement to provide the enhanced transit service described in Part I of Attachment A (i.e., Lakeland Hills-Auburn Sounder Station route) until March 12, 2016, during which the Parties agreed to evaluate whether or not to extend the Agreement again consistent with the provisions of Section 4.1 of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, in January 2016 the Parties extended the Agreement to provide the enhanced transit service described in Part I of Attachment A (i.e., Lakeland Hills-Auburn Sounder Page 351 of 436 Exhibit A _________________________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT NO. 4 to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement between King County, City of Auburn and Pierce Transit Page 2 of 3 Station route) until February 9, 2020, and adjusted the monetary contributions of the Parties to reflect increases to Pierce Transit’s operating and capital costs for providing Route 497; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended or modified by written agreement of the Parties, and further provides that such amendments and modifications may be made for the County by Metro’s General Manager when such amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and mutual covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Attachment A – I. Lakeland Hills Partnership A. Service Description Add the following: Beginning on Monday, January 8, 2018, an additional one (1) AM trip and one (1) PM trip will be operated by Pierce Transit on Route 497 to connect with new Sound Transit Sounder train trips serving the Auburn Station. B. Monetary Contributions The Parties agree that beginning January 8, 2018 and through the term of this extension, the costs for providing eight (8) weekday AM northbound and eight (8) weekday PM southbound trips on the Lakeland Hills service (Route 497) will be divided equally between the three parties, King County, City of Auburn and Pierce Transit. The total annual Service costs are estimated below. The Parties will each be responsible for one-third (1/3) of the total costs. 2017 Operating Cost ($99.78/hr x 4,697 annual hrs.) Capital Cost TOTAL COST AUBURN $ 156,226 $ 23,718 $ 179,944 KING COUNTY $ 156,226 $ 23,718 $ 179,944 PIERCE TRANSIT $ 156,226 $ 23,718 $ 179,944 ANNUAL TOTAL: $ 468,678 $ 71,154 $ 539,832 3. No Other Modifications. Except as specifically provided for in this Amendment No. 4, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Page 352 of 436 Exhibit A _________________________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT NO. 4 to the Transit Service Direct Financial Partnership Agreement between King County, City of Auburn and Pierce Transit Page 3 of 3 4. Effective Date. This Amendment No. 4 shall be effective upon execution by the Parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement as of the date set forth below their signatures. KING COUNTY CITY OF AUBURN By: ___________________________________ By: ____________________________ Rob Gannon Nancy Backus General Manager, Metro Transit Division Mayor Department of Transportation City of Auburn Date:__________________________________ Date: ___________________________ PIERCE TRANSIT By: ____________________________________ Sue Dreier Chief Executive Officer Pierce Transit Date: __________________________________ Page 353 of 436 Page 354 of 436 Page 355 of 436 Page 356 of 436 Page 357 of 436 Page 358 of 436 Page 359 of 436 Page 360 of 436 Page 361 of 436 Page 362 of 436 Page 363 of 436 Page 364 of 436 Page 365 of 436 Page 366 of 436 Page 367 of 436 Page 368 of 436 Page 369 of 436 Page 370 of 436 Page 371 of 436 Page 372 of 436 Page 373 of 436 Page 374 of 436 Page 375 of 436 Page 376 of 436 Page 377 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5333 (Snyder) Date: December 12, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Res 5333 and agreement Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5333. Background Summary: Resolution No. 5333 authorizes the Mayor to execute an I nterlocal Agreement with the King County Department of Transportation to allow King County to administer the City’s Commute Trip Reduction Plan. The City of Auburn has a statutory obligation to implement RCW 70.94.521 the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Act. The purpose of this law is to reduce congestion by lowering vehicle miles traveled per employee and reducing drive alone commute trips in areas of the state affected by air pollution. As a result, the CTR law requires major employers in Auburn to develop, implement and promote programs to encourage their employees to eliminate or reduce their drive-alone commute trips. City and County governments are required to assist local employers in this process. Per state law, King County is authorized to receive state f unding on behalf of local jurisdictions to assist local employers in implementing the Commute Trip Reduction Act and to retain those state funds for work it perf orms on behalf of the City. The City has entered into similar agreements with King County and King County has assisted local employers in Auburn for more than 10 years with the creation and maintenance of CTR programs that help them comply with the regulations. The proposed agreement is f or a two year term from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:RES.B Page 378 of 436 Page 379 of 436 RESOLUTION NO. 5 3 3 3 AN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RELATING TO THE COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Auburn (the "City") is required by RCW 70.94.527 to develop and implement a commute trip reduction plan ("CTR"); and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Transportation, Metro Transit Division (the "County"), is authorized by the State of Washington, in Agreement Number GCB 2670, to receive CTR funds on behalf of local jurisdictions, including the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the County perform the work necessary to satisfy the City's obligations under RCW 70.94.521 et seq. to maximize cost efficacy and efficiency; and WHEREAS, the parties are authorized by RCW 39.34.030 to enter into cooperative agreements for the joint exercise of powers; and WHEREAS, the City finds that entering into an interlocal agreement with the County will for the administration of the City's CTR requirements will promote public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE as follows:. Section 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an Interlocal Agreement with King County, Department of Transportation, for the purpose of Resolution No. 5333 November 22, 2017 Page 1 of 2 Page 380 of 436 authorizing King County's administration of the City of Auburn's Commute Trip Reduction Plan, in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force upon passage and signatures thereon. DATED and SIGNED on this day of 2017. CITY OF AUBURN NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Resolution No. 5333 November 22, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Page 381 of 436 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT Between King County,Department of Transportation,Metro Transit Division and City of Auburn This Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement(the"Agreement")is entered into by and between King County,a home rule charter county of the State of Washington,through its Department of Transportation,Metro Transit Division(the "County"or"Metro Transit")and the City of Auburn(the "City"),either of which entity may be referred to hereinafter individually as Party" or collectively as the "Parties," for the purpose of implementing the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction Law of 1991. WHEREAS,the purpose of RCW 70.94.521,et seq.,the "Commute Trip Reduction(CTR) Law," is to reduce air pollution,traffic congestion and fuel consumption by encouraging commuters to use alternative modes of transportation,such as buses, carpools,vanpools,bicycles,and walking, instead of single occupancy vehicles("SOV");and WHEREAS the CTR Law requires local governments in those counties experiencing the greatest automobile-related air pollution and traffic congestion to develop and implement Commute Trip Reduction("CTR")plans to reduce vehicle miles traveled per employee and drive alone commute trips; and WHEREAS,the CTR Law also requires major employers to develop,implement and promote employee transportation programs to encourage their employees to shift away from drive alone commutes; and WHEREAS,the City has within its jurisdictional boundaries one or more "major employers" and is required by RCW 70.94.527 to develop and implement a commute trip reduction plan;and WHEREAS,the Parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 70.94.527(5); and WHEREAS,King County Code Section 28.94.110 also authorizes the King County Executive to enter into agreements with state and local agencies for assistance in implementing the CTR Law; and WHEREAS, CTR plans developed by local jurisdictions are required to be coordinated and consistent with the CTR plans of adjacent jurisdictions as well as applicable regional plans;and WHEREAS,the Legislature appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to local jurisdictions required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans;and 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 1 of 10 Page 382 of 436 WHEREAS,the County in a separate Commute Trip Reduction Act Agreement with the State,Agreement Number GCB 2760,is authorized to receive CTR funds on behalf of local jurisdictions in exchange for the County's implementation of Commute Trip Reduction Plans and Programs on behalf of those local jurisdictions and retain such funds as payment for the work performed; and WHEREAS,the City desires to have the County perform the work necessary to satisfy the City's statutory obligations under the Commute Trip Reduction Act and to retain the City's allocation of state funds as payment for those services;and WHEREAS,the City and the County desire through this Agreement to implement the CTR Law consistent with the rules established by the state Commute Trip Reduction Board;and WHEREAS,the City can achieve cost efficiencies and administrative consistency by contracting with the County for CTR implementation; NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms,conditions,mutual promises and covenants set forth herein,the Parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a mechanism that will allow for certain tasks to be undertaken by the County on behalf of the City to implement the City's obligations under the CTR Law and to set forth the responsibilities of the Parties with respect to that objective. 2. DEFINITIONS The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this Agreement: Administrative Representative"means the primary administrative contact for issues related to this Agreement as designated in Section 9.2 of the Agreement. Affected Employer" means an employer required by RCW 70.94.521 and the City's CTR Plan to implement a CTR program(see also "major employer"). Commute Trip Reduction Plan (CTR Plan)"means a plan adopted by the City designed to reduce the proportion of drive alone commute trips and commute trip vehicle miles and to administer and enforce the CTR programs of affected employers located within its jurisdiction Commute Trip Reduction Program(CTR Program)" means a program designed by an Affected Employer to reduce the proportion of drive alone commute trips and vehicle miles traveled by its employees. Employer Transportation Coordinator(ETC)"means point of contact between the employer and its employees to implement,promote and administer the employer's CTR program. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 2 of 10 Page 383 of 436 CTR Funds" means state funds appropriated by the state and allocated to counties and cities for implementation of commute trip reduction plans. Major Employer" means a private or public employer that employs one hundred or more full- time employees at a single worksite who are scheduled to begin their regular workday between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekdays for at least twelve continuous months during the year,as provided in RCW 70.94.521 (herein also known as an"Affected Employer"). State" is the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)unless otherwise noted. 3. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Provision of CTR Services. Metro Transit will perform the CTR implementation services specified with particularity in the Scope of Work(the"Work") set forth as Exhibit A,which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3.2 Authorization. The City shall authorize and direct the State to reimburse the County directly. 4. PAYMENT AND BILLING The County will invoice the State on a quarterly basis for direct reimbursement for the CTR functions to be performed pursuant to this agreement. 5. WORK SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS REVIEW 5.1 Progress Reviews. The County will submit a quarterly report of progress and anticipated activities to jurisdiction representatives. On-going,periodic review of issues and materials will also be conducted with the jurisdiction representatives. 5.2 State Evaluation Requirements. At the request of the City,the County will provide information to the State for monitoring or evaluation activities. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective July 1,2017 and will remain in effect through June 30,2019, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 3 of 10 Page 384 of 436 7. TERMINATION 7.1 Termination for Default. Either Party may terminate this Agreement in the event the other Party fails to perform a material obligation of this Agreement. Written notice of a Party's intention to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Subsection 7.1 shall be provided to the other Party not less than fifteen(15)calendar days prior to the effective date of termination. 7.2 Termination for Convenience. Either Party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement,in whole or in part,for convenience and without cause. Written notice of a Party's intention to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Subsection 7.2 shall be provided to the other Party not less than thirty(30)days prior to the effective date of termination. 7.3 County Funding and Termination for Non-Appropriation. Performance of any Work undertaken by the County pursuant to this Agreement in advance of receiving reimbursement by the City beyond the current appropriation year is conditioned upon the appropriation by the County Council of sufficient funds to support the performance of the Work. Should such an appropriation not be approved,the Agreement shall terminate at the close of the current appropriation year. The appropriation year ends on December 31St of each year. 7.4 Termination Due to Loss of State Funding. If at any time during the Agreement period the State acts to terminate,reduce,modify, or withhold CTR State Funds allotted to the City pursuant to RCW 79.94.544 then either Party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty 30)days advance written notice to the other Party. 8. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS Either Party may request changes to the provisions of this Agreement. Any such changes must be mutually agreed upon and incorporated by written amendment to this Agreement. No variation or alteration of the terms of this Agreement will be valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the Parties hereto. 9. NOTIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CONTACTS 9.1 Administrative Representatives. Both Parties shall designate an administrative representative to act as the contact person for matters pertaining to this Agreement. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 4of10 Page 385 of 436 9.2 Contact Persons and Addresses. For the County: Christi Masi,Project Manager King County Metro Transit 201 S. Jackson St.,KSC-TR-0326 Seattle,WA 98104-2615 206)477-3843 For the City: Mr.Joe Welsh,Transportation Planner City of Auburn 25 West Main St. Auburn,WA 98002 253) 804-5050 9.3 Notice. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent postage prepaid by U.S. Mail,return receipt requested,to the Parties'respective administrative representatives at the addresses identified in Subsection 9.2 of this Agreement. 10. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The Parties,through their designated representatives identified in Subsection 9.2 of this Agreement, shall use their best efforts to resolve any disputes pertaining to this Agreement that may arise between the Parties. If these designated representatives are unable to resolve a dispute,the responsible project managers of both Parties shall review the matter and attempt to resolve it. If they are unable to resolve the dispute,the matter shall be reviewed by the department directors of both Parties or his or her designee. The Parties agree to exhaust each of these procedural steps before seeking to resolve disputes in a court of law or any other forum. 11. AUDITING OF RECORDS,DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS The State Auditor shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours, and as often as the State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary,the non-privileged records of the City and the County with respect to the matters covered by this Agreement. Both Parties shall have similar access and rights with respect to the records of the other Party. The Parties'representatives shall be permitted to audit,examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,materials,payrolls,and records of matters covered by this Agreement. Such rights last for three(3)years from the date final payment is made hereunder, 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between I{ing County and the City of Auburn Page 5 of 10 Page 386 of 436 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS Each Party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions,and those of its officers,agents or employees,while performing work pursuant to this Agreement,to the fullest extent required by law,and agrees to save,indemnify,defend,and hold the other Parties harmless from any such liability: In the case of negligence of multiple Parties,any damages allowed shall be assessed in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each Party,and each Party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other Parties in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other Parties. The City acknowledges it is solely responsible for its compliance with the CTR Act,and for the adoption,implementation,and enforcement of any ordinances,plans,and programs related to the CTR Act. The City shall indemnify and hold King County harmless from, and shall process and defend,at its own expense,any and all claims,demands,suits at law of equity, actions,penalties, losses, damages, or costs arising out of,in connection with,or incidental to any act or omission of the City or any of its officers, employees,subcontractors or agents in adopting or enforcing any ordinances,plans and programs related to the CTR Act. 13. LEGAL RELATIONS 13.1 No Third Party Beneficiaries. It is understood that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the Parties hereto and gives no right to any other person or entity. 13.2 No Partnership or Joint Venture. No joint venture, agent-principal relationship or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees or agents of one Party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed,or represent themselves to be, employees or agents of the other Party. 13.3 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 13.4 Jurisdiction and Venue. The King County Superior Court, situated in Seattle, Washington, shall have exclusive jurisdiction and venue over any legal action arising under this Agreement. 13.5 Mutual Negotiation and Construction. This Agreement and each of the terms and provisions hereof shall be deemed to have been explicitly negotiated between,and mutually drafted by,both Parties, and the language in all parts of this Agreement shall,in all cases, be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either Party. 13.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve the purposes and objectives originally contemplated by the Parties. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 6 of 10 Page 387 of 436 13.7 Waiver of Default. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless stated to be such in writing, signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties, and attached to the original Agreement. 13.8 Assignment. Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein,may be assigned by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. 13.9 Binding on Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and all of its terms,provisions, conditions, and covenants,together with any exhibits and attachments now or hereafter made a part hereof, shall be binding on the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 13.10 Rights and Remedies. Both Parties'rights and remedies in this Agreement are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. 13.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement embodies the Parties' entire understanding and agreement on the issues covered by it,except as may be supplemented by subsequent written amendment to this Agreement, and supersedes any prior negotiations, representations or draft agreements on this matter, either written or oral. 13.12 Survival. The provisions of this Section 13 (Legal Relations) shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 14. FORCE MAJEURE Either Party to this Agreement shall be excused from performance of any responsibilities and obligations under this Agreement, and shall not be liable for damages due to failure to perform, during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by a cause directly or indirectly beyond its control,including,but not limited to: any incidence of fire,flood, snow, earthquake, or acts of nature; strikes or labor actions; accidents, riots, insurrection, terrorism, or acts of war; order of any court of competent jurisdiction or authorized civil authority commandeering material,products, or facilities by the federal, state or local government; or national fuel shortage; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other Party to this Agreement, and provided that such non-performance is beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the Party not performing. In no event should this provision eliminate the obligation of the City to make payment to the County for the Work performed pursuant to this Agreement. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 7 of 10 Page 388 of 436 15. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS The Parties agree to comply with all applicable federal,state,and local laws,rules,and regulations, including those pertaining to nondiscrimination and agree to require the same of any subcontractors providing services or performing any of the Work using funds provided under this Agreement. 16. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT—COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in two (2)counterparts, either of which shall be regarded for all purposes as an original. Dated this day of °C.—WC ' 2017. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the latest date written below. KING COUNTY City of Auburn DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION METRO TRANSIT DIVISION By:By: Matt Hansen Manager, Customer Title: Communications and Services King County Metro Transit Date: 10" Date: Approved as to form: Approved as t. +rm: 01410 K.C.P.A.O. By: A A61/1 `PIA C'Attorney w Date: 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 8 of 10 Page 389 of 436 Exhibit A City of Auburn Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement Scope of Work Period: July 1,2017 through June 30,2019 King County will implement all elements of the Auburn CTR work plan through the following strategies and deliverables: Strategy 1: Train all new ETC's and new sites to ensure that they have an understanding of the requirements of the law, implementation strategies and their site's performance to date. Description: Consult with ETCs at new sites and with new ETCs at existing sites, offer on-line interactive ETC training on the CTR program and Employee survey,update and maintain CTR website and printed information. Deliverables: Offer on-line interactive training and a live CTR program and Employee survey training annually Consult with new ETCs at new sites and at existing sites Maintain CTR website as a source of information,materials and tools Strategy 2: Track and notify employers of legally required activities and provide technical assistance to all employers for legal compliance. Description: Notify new sites; assist them with baseline survey and initial program development. Send survey and program notifications to all sites,review extensions and exemptions requests, set up and assist sites with paper and online surveys and program reporting. Negotiate steps for compliance with non-compliant worksites. Maintain database and master file records on all sites. Provide WSDOT with an electronic copy of city's CTR-affected employers and ETCs quarterly or as required by WSDOT. Deliverables: Notify new and existing sites of survey and program reporting requirements within timeframes specified in Law and/or Ordinance Maintain electronic and paper records in accordance with WSDOT requirements Document sites' compliance with required activities Strategy 3: Focus program review and survey analysis time on sites that have not made progress towards goal and spend less time reviewing program reports for sites that have made progress or goal. Description: For sites that have met or made progress towards goal,focus program review for completeness of report and approve using electronic submittal. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 9of10 Page 390 of 436 For no progress sites, conduct survey analysis and make recommendations for program improvements to ETC. Review programs for inclusion of recommendations,as well as completeness and program summary. Deliverables: Review all programs for completeness Approve programs for sites that have made progress or goal Consult with sites that have not made progress or goal and recommend improvements to program Document on quarterly CTR progress report: 1)the number of CTR programs reviewed: 2)the number of consultations with no-progress sites Strategy 4: Assist ETCs with marketing of commute programs and ensure they meet their program information distribution requirements. Help ETCs become a major resource to their employees by providing them with up-to-date commute information,tools for communicating with employees,turn-key commuter promotions, and opportunities to attend employer network group meetings. Description: Review program summary and make marketing recommendations at sites that did not make progress towards goals. Send transportation related news and announcements via email to all ETCs; send information for promotions such as Wheel Options and Bike to Work Day; schedule, promote, engage speakers and invite ETCs to employer network group meetings,as needed. Deliverables: Send regular emails to ETCs on transportation related issues that they can share with their employees Inform ETCs of program summary template on website Send ETCs updated commute options marketing materials in an electronic format Distribute promotional materials to sites for county and state-wide promotions Notify ETCs of network group meetings Strategy 5: Actively promote alternatives to drive-alone commuting at worksites targeted by location, corridor, industry or lack of progress toward goal. Description: Identify highly congested employment areas and/or sites that have not made progress toward goals for targeted outreach. Develop strategies to help ETCs communicate and promote program to employees, implement targeted promotions. Deliverables: Organize promotions or events at select targeted areas, corridors or industries. 2017-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementation Agreement Between King County and the City of Auburn Page 10of10 Page 391 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5336 (Coleman) Date: December 7, 2017 Department: Finance Attachments: Res 5336 and Agreement Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5336. Background Summary: SW 18-L-009 is a service agreement between the City of Auburn and Recology CleanScapes, Inc. to continue the litter control program in 2018. This agreement with Recology is f or $184,161.60 in 2018, which is a 5% increase over 2017 costs. Recology staff will continue to provide litter removal and litter can services along 85 miles of roads in the City of Auburn. This item is included in the 2018 budget. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Coleman Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Number:RES.C Page 392 of 436 RESOLUTION NO. 5 3 3 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND RECOLOGY CLEANSCAPES FOR A LITTER CONTROL AND RECYCLING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City annually conducts a litter and recycling program to reduce the solid waste that accumulates on public streets, sidewalks and other public areas in the city; and WHEREAS, Recology CleanScapes Inc. is a private corporation that provides collection, disposal and recycling services to municipalities, and who is able to provide Auburn with a twelve-month litter cleanup and recycling program; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties to enter into an agreement for litter and recycling collection. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an Agreement between the City and Recology CleanScapes Inc. for litter collection and recycling which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Resolution No. 5336 December 12, 2017 Page 1 of 2 Page 393 of 436 Dated and Signed this day of 2017. CITY OF AUBURN NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APP' a ED TO FORM: piriq AA iel B. Hei•, ity Attorney Resolution No. 5336 December 12, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Page 394 of 436 CITY OF AUBURN AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES SW18-L-009 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this day of December, 2017, by and between the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Recology CleanScapes Inc., 117 S. Main Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104, hereinafter referred to as the "Provider." WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, the City is engaged in or readying itself to be engaged in its litter control and recycling program and is in need of services of individuals, employees or firms for litter control and recycling work; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Provider to provide certain services in connection with the City's work related to litter control and recycling; and, WHEREAS, the Provider is qualified and able to provide services in connection with the City's needs for the above-described work, and is willing and agreeable to provide such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope of Services The Provider agrees to perform in a good and professional manner the tasks described on Exhibit"A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (The tasks described on Exhibit"A" shall be individually referred to as a task," and collectively referred to as the "services.") The Provider shall perform the services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this Agreement and the performance thereof, to have entered into any partnership, joint venture, employment or other relationship with the City. 2. Additional Services From time to time hereafter, the parties hereto may agree to the performance by the Provider of additional services with respect to related work or projects. Any such agreement(s) shall be set forth in writing and shall be executed by the respective parties prior to the Provider's performance of the services there under, except as may be provided to the contrary in Section 3 of this Agreement. Upon proper completion and execution of an Amendment(agreement for additional services), such Amendment shall be incorporated into this Agreement and shall have the same force and effect as if the terms of such Amendment were a part of this Agreement as originally executed. The performance of services pursuant to an Amendment shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement except where the Amendment provides to the contrary, in which case the terms and conditions of any such SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 1 of 7 Page 395 of 436 Amendment shall control. In all other respects, any Amendment shall supplement and be construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3. Performance of Additional Services Priorto Execution of an Amendment The parties hereby agree that situations may arise in which emergency services other than those described on Exhibit"A" but reasonably related thereto are desired by the City and the time period for the completion of such services makes the execution of Amendment impractical prior to the commencement of the Provider's performance of the requested services. The Provider hereby agrees that it shall perform such services upon the written request of an authorized representative of the City pending execution of an Amendment, at a rate of compensation to be agreed to in connection therewith. The invoice procedure for any such additional services shall be as described in Section 8 of this Agreement. 4. Provider's Representations The Provider hereby represents and warrants that he has all necessary licenses and certifications to perform the services provided for herein, and is qualified to perform such services. 5. City's Responsibilities The City shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of the Provider: a. Designate in writing a person to act as the City's representative with respect to the services. The City's designee shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the services. b. Furnish the Provider with all information, criteria, objectives, schedules and standards for the project and the services provided for herein. c. Arrange for access to the property or facilities as required for the Provider to perform the services provided for herein. Specific responsibilities of the City are set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this agreement. 6. Provider's Responsibilities Specific responsibilities of the Provider are set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this agreement. 7. Acceptable Standards The Provider shall be responsible to provide, in connection with the services contemplated in this Agreement, work products and services of a quality and professional standard reasonably acceptable to the City. 8. Compensation As compensation for the Provider's performance of the services provided for herein, the City shall pay the Provider the fees and costs specified on Exhibit"C" attached hereto and made a part hereof(or as specified in an Amendment). The Provider shall SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 2 of 7 Page 396 of 436 submit to the City an invoice or statement of time spent on tasks included in the scope of work provided herein, and the City shall process the invoice or statement in the next billing/claim cycle following receipt of the invoice or statement, and shall remit payment to the Provider thereafter in the normal course, subject to any conditions or provisions in this Agreement or Amendment. The Agreement number must appear on all invoices submitted. 9. Time for Performance and Term of Agreement The Provider shall not begin any work under this Agreement until January 2, 2018. The Provider shall perform the services provided for herein in accordance with the direction and scheduling provided on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. The Term of this Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2018. 10. Ownership and Use of Documents All documents, reports, memoranda, diagrams, sketches, plans, surveys, design calculations, working drawings and any other materials created or otherwise prepared by the Provider as part of his performance of this Agreement (the "Work Products") shall be owned by and become the property of the City, and may be used by the City for any purpose beneficial to the City. 11. Records Inspection and Audit All compensation payments shall be subject to the adjustments for any amounts found upon audit or otherwise to have been improperly invoiced, and all records and books of accounts pertaining to any work performed under this Agreement shall be subject to inspection and audit by the City for a period of up to three (3) years from the final payment for work performed under this Agreement. 12. Continuation of Performance In the event that any dispute or conflict arises between the parties while this Contract is in effect, the Provider agrees that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, the Provider shall continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue work toward successful completion of assigned duties and responsibilities. 13. Administration of Agreement This Agreement shall be administered by Kevin Kelly, on behalf of the Provider, and by the Mayor of the City, or designee, on behalf of the City. Any written notices required by the terms of this Agreement shall be served on or mailed to the following addresses: City of Auburn Recology CleanScapes Inc. Joan Nelson Kevin Kelly Solid Waste & Recycling Supervisor General Manager 25 W Main St 117 S. Main Street, Suite 300 Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 253-876-1900 Fax: 206-859-6701 SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 3 of 7 Page 397 of 436 E-mail: jenelson@auburnwa.gov E-mail: kkelly@recology.com 14. Notices All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this Agreement, to the address for the party set forth above. Either party may change his, her or its address by giving notice in writing, stating his, her or its new address, to the other party, pursuant to the procedure set forth above. 15. Insurance The Provider shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the amounts described below. Insurance is to be placed with authorized insurers in Washington State with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A-: VII. The Provider shall furnish evidence, satisfactory to the City, of all such policies. During the term hereof, the Provider shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies: a. Automobile Liability insurance, covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Provider shall maintain automobile insurance with minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of$1,000,000.00 per accident. b. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 or its equivalent and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations, stop gap liability, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Policy Limit. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an additional insured under the Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 10 01 or its equivalent and Additional Insured-Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000.00 each occurrence, 2,000,000.00 general aggregate, and a $2,000,000.00 products-completed operations aggregate limit. SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 4 of 7 Page 398 of 436 c. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. d. Umbrella/Excess Liability Insurance in a minimum amount of five million dollars 5,000,000.00), providing coverage on a following-form basis over the Employer's Liability Insurance limit, the Commercial General Liability Insurance limit, and the Automobile Liability Insurance limit. 16. Indemnification The Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and employees, or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of the negligent act or omission of the Provider, its officers, agents, employees, or any of them relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. If a final judgment is rendered against the City, its officers, agents, employees and/or any of them, or jointly against the City and the Provider and their respective officers, agents and employees, or any of them, the Provider shall satisfy the same to the extent that such judgment was due to the Provider's negligent acts or omissions. 17. Assignment Neither party to this Agreement shall assign any right or obligation hereunder in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. No assignment or transfer of any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obligation under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liability or obligation. 18. Nondiscrimination The Provider may not discriminate regarding any services or activities to which this Agreement may apply directly or through contractual, hiring, or other arrangements on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or where there is the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap. 19. Amendment, Modification or Waiver No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound, or such party's or parties' duly authorized representative(s) and specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such amendment, modification or waiver. Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall not affect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. Nothing herein shall limit the remedies or rights of the parties hereto under and pursuant to this Agreement. 20. Termination and Suspension Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 5 of 7 Page 399 of 436 Agreement through no fault of the party terminating the Agreement, and does not cure such failure of performance within ten (10) days after written notice of the failure by the non-breaching party. The City may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days written notice to the Provider. If the Provider is notified by another contractor of the City that one or more of the Provider's services hereunder violate the exclusive rights granted by the City to such contractor or interfere with such contractor's contract with the City, then the Provider may cease providing such services and/or terminate this Agreement, upon not less than seven (7) days written notice to the City. If this Agreement is terminated early, the Provider shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination in accordance with the rate of compensation provided in Exhibit "C" hereof. 21. Parties in Interest This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein shall inure to and bind, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise prohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and it,does not create a contractual relationship with or exist for the benefit of any third party, including contractors, sub-contractors and their sureties. 22. Costs to Prevailing Party In the event of such litigation or other legal action, to enforce any rights, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing parties shall be entitled to receive its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 23. Applicable Law This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action hereunder shall be in of the county in Washington State in which the property or project is located, and if not site specific, then in King County, Washington; provided, however, that it is agreed and understood that any applicable statute of limitation shall commence no later than the substantial completion by the Provider of the services. 24. Captions, Headings and Titles All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to which they apply. As used herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 6 of 7 Page 400 of 436 interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been drafted by mutual agreement of the parties. 25. Severable Provisions Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 26. Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter. 27. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be one and the same Agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF AUBURN RECOLOGY CLEANSCAPES INC. Nancy Backus, Mayor Kevin Kelly, General Manager Attest: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk Appr• ed as to .• D- -'el Heid, CI Attorney SW 18-L-009 Recology CleanScapes Page 7 of 7 Page 401 of 436 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this Agreement is to contract with the Provider on a clean-up program for the City of Auburn. Litter Crew The Provider shall make available a Litter Crew consisting of two (2) employees and two (2) pickup trucks. The Provider's Litter Crew shall perform the following services within the City: 1. Specific Tasks The Provider's Litter Crew will collect and remove litter, trash, and debris from the shoulders of City public ways (including but not limited to streets, roads, alleys, paths, and parkways), public parking lots, and other designated public areas. Tasks include the following: a. Litter clean-up i. Blow and sweep building edge to curb line in core area as needed. ii. Bio hazard removal (urine, vomit, feces, sharps) b. Designated public place litter can service as determined by the City. c. Roadside litter patrols as determined by the City. City shall ensure that the tasks to be performed by the Litter Crew and the schedule for completion are reasonable. The Provider shall not be required to remove materials of a size, type or quantity that cannot reasonably be removed by such a crew. 2. Examination of Work Sites The Provider shall examine all work sites thoroughly before commencing work at the site. It shall be the responsibility of the Provider to verify all the duties, assignments, and job sites. All existing conditions at the job site will be noted and copies with verification noted, given to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Supervisor on a monthly basis. 3. Hours The Provider shall perform tasks to completion between the hours of 6:30 AM and 2:30 PM Monday through Friday (seven (7) service hours per employee per day, subject to required meal and break periods). The Provider shall observe New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. SW 18-L-009 Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 Page 402 of 436 EXHIBIT B RESPONSIBILITIES PROVIDER The Provider shall be responsible for the following: 1. The performance of all work as provided in this Agreement with its own employees. Individuals who perform work under this Agreement must be carried on the Provider's payroll. The Provider is responsible for administering and paying employee wages, benefits, and all other employee-related costs. Although the Provider's company headquarters may be located outside of Auburn, Washington, the Provider shall provide a full-time supervisor who will continuously oversee the Provider's employee work and will have authority to represent the Provider in the day-to-day activities. The Provider will present the supervisor's name, address, and telephone number to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Supervisor at the beginning of the contract period. 2. The Provider is responsible for the safety of its employees at the sites where assigned tasks are performed. If the City provides tools, equipment, safety gear, traffic control devices, and any other items for the Provider's use in the performance of contracted duties, the Provider shall be responsible for the condition and return of the tools while they are in the possession of the Provider and its employees. No equipment or supplies will be removed from City premises except as required for the performance of assigned duties. 3. Monthly reports shall be provided to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Supervisor on a monthly basis. Monthly reports shall include the following: a. Bag count b. Bios collected c. Litter can overflow d. Graffiti removals (if any) e. Location and hours of requested pressure washing (if any) f. Event service (if any) 4. The Provider shall supply a motor vehicle to transport its employees to and from the designated work sites. The Provider's vehicle shall be well identified with signs and equipped with safety warning lights and emergency flashers. 5. The Provider shall supply litter bags, safety gear, rain gear, foul weather gear, footwear as required, and clothing as needed for its employees. SW 18-L-009 Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 Page 403 of 436 6. The Provider shall follow accepted safety practices in the performance of all work. The Provider's employees must be trained in traffic control and must possess a Traffic Control Flagging License" certified by the State of Washington. 7. The following additional services are not included in the pricing set forth in Exhibit C, but may be provided under this Agreement at the request of the City. The services may be initiated by an email or other written request from the City to the Provider and are not subject to the Additional Services requirement of Section 2, but are subject to all other provisions of this Agreement. The cost of such services shall be as indicated below, or if not so indicated, then as agreed by the parties at the time of the request. Service Cost Pressure Washing Spinner and Wand service 100/hr.* Additional Streetscapes Services 52.50/hr. 1 employee and 1 pickup truck; tasks as described in Section 1 of Exhibit A) Graffiti Removal TBD graffiti removed or painted over within 5 days of request; grey stain-blocking primer used to paint over) Event Service TBD delivery and removal of carts; event day litter removal; post-event cleanup) Bulky Item Removal TBD large furniture, white goods (appliances), large piles of loose debris, other oversize items beyond scope of normal litter service) Assuming waste water can be dumped at City M&O at no cost to Provider. CITY The City shall be responsible for the following: 1. The City shall supply the Provider and its Auburn supervisor a copy of the daily work schedule and any change notices to use as a basic guide for the distribution of work each week. The work schedule may be changed as deemed appropriate by the City and a copy of such changes provided to the Provider and the City. The City shall determine the priority of the various assignments. The City shall verify that all services are satisfactorily performed as scheduled. 2. The City shall supply the Provider with a location map of the public place litter cans and the frequency that they shall be serviced. SW 18-L-009 Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 Page 404 of 436 3. The City shall at no cost to the Provider provide disposal for all materials collected by the Provider during services performed under this Agreement. The Provider shall deliver all such materials to the City's Maintenance and Operations Division facility located at 1305 C Street SW, Auburn, WA ("City M&O"). SW 18-L-009 Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 Page 405 of 436 EXHIBIT C 2018 FEE SCHEDULE Monthly Fee # of Months Not-To-Exceed Amount Litter Crew 15,346.80 12 184,161.60 Total Not To Exceed Amount: 184,161.60 SW 18-L-009 Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 Page 406 of 436 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5337 (Hinman) Date: December 12, 2017 Department: Administration Attachments: Resolution No. 5337 Action Plan Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5337. Background Summary: The Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Annual Action Plan is a requirement of all Community Development Block Grant entitlements to receive their annual fund allocation. The 2018 Action Plan details what projects will be undertaken using Community Development Block Grant f unds in Auburn by the end of the program year. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Hinman Meeting Date:December 18, 2017 Item Numb er:RES.D Page 407 of 436 RESOLUTION NO. 5 3 3 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN YEARS 2015-2019 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn was designated as an entitlement community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; and WHEREAS, the primary objective of the Consolidated Plan and CDBG Program is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low-income and moderate-income; and WHEREAS, to be eligible for funding, the City of Auburn must annually update the action plan for its Consolidated Plan that serves as a federally required planning document to guide the City of Auburn’s human service and community development efforts; and WHEREAS, the planning process to develop the Consolidated Plan involved citizen participation and guidance from non-profit and governmental agencies serving low income residents in the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn heard and considered public comment about its proposed 2018 Action Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Page 408 of 436 Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of 24 CFR 91, the City hereby adopts the 2018 Action Plan for the Consolidated Plan for Years 2015-2019. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2017. CITY OF AUBURN ________________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Page 409 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction Each year the City of Auburn executes specific actions to implement the goals and strategies of the Consolidated Plan for Years 2015-2019. Actions that will be undertaken in 2018 are outlined in this Annual Action Plan. The City of Auburn anticipates the receipt of approximately $428,078 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in 2018. In addition to CDBG funds, the City allocates 1% of the City's General Funds to Human Services. Human Services oversees and is responsible for providing and managing financial resources to more than 30 non-profit agencies that serve the Auburn community, administering the local housing repair program, and developing collaborations among community partners to strengthen the response to residents in need. The 2018 Action Plan proposes to allocate $42,500 of CDBG funds to public services. Most of those funds ($32,500) will be used to provide dental and medical care to uninsured or under insured low income Auburn residents. The remaining $10,000 will be used for employment training. Approximately $85,000 of the CDBG funds will be allocated to program administration, which includes planning and citizen participation. The remaining $300,000 will be allocated to residential rehabilitation. The City of Auburn is committed to continuing to focus on achieving solutions to recurring social problems and achieving a greater collaboration among service providers. Overall the implementation of the Consolidated Plan is progressing as planned and all of the activities included are underway. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This Action Plan allocates a total of $428,078 dollars in anticipated 2017 Community Development Block Grant funds, to support the Community Development Block Grant program. Page 410 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) With the overall goal of reducing the number of people living in poverty within the City of Auburn, the following objectives and outcomes will be employed: 1. Support decent, affordable housing for low income residents 2. Support job training activities as part of an anti-poverty strategy 3. Support low- and moderate-income neighborhoods 4. Support accessibility to affordable health care 5. Administer the Community Development Block Grant program to meet the community needs and HUD requirements To accomplish these outcomes and objectives, the City invests in programs that meet the community basic needs, increase self-sufficiency, provide economic opportunity and develop a safe community. 3. Evaluation of past performance During the past year Auburn has accomplished significant achievement on its programs and impacted the lives of thousands of residents. In 2016 alone, projects funded by the City completed the following: • Over 50 senior and/or disabled homeowners received housing repair services. • 12 Auburn small businesses received technical assistance to expand or start up in Auburn benefitting Low to Moderate income areas. • Over 300 low to moderate income residents received free or low cost medical and/or dental care • 20 low to moderate income Auburn residents received employment training and supportive services 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process The city has engaged in a public participation process for the 2017 Annual Action Plan, as outlined below: • Drafts of the Action Plan have been made available for public at City Hall and notices of its public view will be publicized in the local newspaper as of November 14, 2017 • Request for public comment will be emailed to service agencies on November 13, 2017 seeking input through December 15, 2017 • A public hearing will be provided on December 18, 2017, during the City Council meeting to receive input on the 2018 Annual Action Plan Page 411 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The City of Auburn in conjunction with the Consortium consulted with multiple public and private agencies during the development of the consolidated plan. Agencies that participated in consultations included: the King County Housing Authority, King County All Home, other government human service providers and nonprofit agencies delivering services in Auburn and the sub-region. In addition to conducting consultations during the development of the plan, the City of Auburn collaborates and works closely with numerous coalitions, committees and government entities. 5. Summary of public comments No public comments have been received. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them No public comments have been received. 7. Summary Auburn residents along with stakeholders, community partners, service providers and others were consulted during the development of the Action Plan. They provided valuable input that supported to the development of the outcomes and objectives listed in the plan. No public comments have been received during the public comment period. Page 412 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Agency Role Name Department/Agency Lead Agency AUBURN CDBG Administrator ESG Administrator Table 1 – Responsible Agencies Annual Action Plan Contact Information Joy Scott Human Services Manager 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 253-876-1965 jscott@auburnwa.gov Page 413 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) 1. Introduction The City of Auburn recognizes the importance of citizen participation in the development and implementation of the annual Action Plan. During the process of development, city staff consulted with multiple public and private agencies. Agencies that participated in consultations included: the King County Department of Community and Human Services, King County Human Services Planners, nonprofit agencies delivering services in Auburn and the sub- region as well as City of Auburn internal partnerships. In addition to conducting consultations during the development of the plan, the City of Auburn collaborates and works closely with numerous coalitions, committees and government entities on an ongoing basis in efforts to enhance strategies and systems to meet established goals and objectives designated in the plan. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(l)). The City of Auburn works closely with partnering King County jurisdictions, public housing authorities and health providers to develop systems in order to improve the quality of service and access for low-income residents as well as the community as a whole within the city and throughout the region. Additionally, the City participates in monthly meetings with staff from King County Department of Community and Human Services, Public Health King County, the Housing Development Consortium, Valley Cities, the Multi-Service Center, and the King County Housing Authority to review program progress and delivery of services funded through regional efforts. This regional collaboration work is supported by the South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership, which Auburn and other South King County Cities contribute to in order to fund a full time position to address issues related to housing and homelessness in the South King County region. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. Page 414 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) King County’s regional Continuum of Care (CoC) aims to make homelessness in our region rare, brief, and one-time. In Coordination with the CoC, Auburn supported funding programs such as the Valley Cities Landing, Nexus Youth and Families Severson House and the YWCA Auburn Transitional Housing Program. All programs provide housing and supportive services to homeless persons (including homeless Veterans, families, chronically homeless individuals and unaccompanied youth). The City also participates in the annual Point in Time count of unsheltered individuals in King County, organized by our CoC. Coordinating services and funding is critical to our region’s implementation of the King County All Home strategic plan on homelessness which aims to help individuals and families experiencing homelessness meet three goals: • achieve residential stability • increase their skill levels and/or incomes • strengthen their ability to influence decisions that affect their lives Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS All projects receiving CoC funding are required by HUD to apply for support through a local Continuum of Care. For King County, the Continuum of Care encompasses programs and activities within the borders of King County. Each continuum sets funding priorities and need for its community. The King County CoC priorities are set by All Home King County. Auburn staff contribute to the CoC by working collaboratively with All Home on efforts for King County to ensure coordination efforts between the two entities. 2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and consultations Page 415 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization KING COUNTY Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - County What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City of Auburn consulted with all types of organizations that primarily serve the populations focused on in the Action Plan and implemented programs that addressed the greatest need in the community. The only types of organizations not consulted with were corrections facilities and homeless shelters. The rationale for not consulting with these facilities is that the City does not host either type of organization in the region. Page 416 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care King County The goals of Auburn's Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of the CoC to address the needs of homeless residents in the community and reduce the risk of homelessness. Table 3 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Page 417 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting Citizen participation plays a crucial role in the success of the City's Annual Action Plan. The goals are to hear the community's feedback and recommendations on how CDBG funds should be invested and how services can coordinate to achieve the greatest impact. In addition to the targeted outreach listed below, the City regularly engages service providers and stakeholders in discussions regarding human services and local economic development needs. Organizations funded by the city are monitored throughout the year and report quarterly on progress, trends, and challenges. City staff co-host a monthly meeting of service providers working with individuals and families experiencing homelessness in the region to gather feedback and support increased capacity building through broad collaboration of regional providers. In addition, City staff meet regularly with other cities in the area and other funders to evaluate gaps in services and seek solutions to local and regional community development challenges. Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 1 Newspaper Ad Non-targeted/broad community To be included following the public comment period. 2 Email Service providers in Auburn To be included following the public comment period Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach Page 418 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The City of Auburn anticipates funding for the duration of the Consolidated Plan from • CDBG • City of Auburn General Fund allocation for Human Services Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 428,078 0 0 428,078 856,156 Page 419 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ General Fund public - local Public Services 500,000 0 0 500,000 1,000,000 1% of City’s General Fund is allocated to Human Services. These funds support agencies that deliver services to Auburn residents addressing child abuse and neglect, domestic violence and sexual assault, health care, and poverty reduction. Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City of Auburn relies on CDBG funds to support community and economic development projects and activities in efforts to support low to moderate income populations to become self-sufficient and sustain affordable housing. However, CDBG funds are not the only source of funds the City uses to support community projects and activities. The City's general funds are used to support direct services benefitting Auburn's at risk populations in addition to CDBG funds. CDBG funds do not require matching funds. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs Page 420 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) identified in the plan N/A Discussion The City of Auburn will use CDBG funds to support eligible projects and activities that align with CDBG guidelines and regulations. Page 421 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 End Homelessness 2015 2019 Homeless Homeless Prevention and Intervention CDBG: $42,500 Homelessness Prevention: 150 Persons Assisted Jobs created/retained: 15 Jobs 2 Ensure Decent, Affordable Housing 2015 2019 Affordable Housing Public Housing Affordable Housing Development and Preservation Neighborhood Revitalization CDBG: $300,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 50 Household Housing Unit 3 Planning and Administration 2015 2019 Planning and Administration CDBG: $85,578 Table 6 – Goals Summary Page 422 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) Introduction Auburn's Annual Action Plan provides descriptions of proposals of how funds will be prioritized to achieve goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. Projects funded by the City will address the priority needs of providing assistance to prevent homelessness, ensure affordable housing and a suitable living environment. Projects and programs are selected through a competitive application process to ensure optimal quality services is provided to the community in use of the funds. # Project Name 1 Housing Repair 2 Administration 3 Healthpoint 4 Employment Training Program Table 7 – Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs The allocations proposed are based on the assessment of Auburn's needs, the resources available in the region, the availability of other funds also focusing on needs, and the purpose of Consolidated Plan funds. Should CDBG revenues exceed the proposed amount, the additional resources shall be allocated in accordance to the following guidelines: • Fill gaps in human services primarily healthcare, homeless prevention and intervention and affordable housing accessibility. • Increase funding for community development projects and activities including housing, community facilities and economic development. If increases are not significant enough to enhance projects or activities funds may be placed in contingency for programming later in the year or the following program year. Should CDBG revenues come in lower than anticipated; the City will continue with its planned policy and to the extent allowed reduce funding allocations in physical development projects and administrative activities. Should CDBG revenues come in less than originally proposed, the City will continue managing Page 423 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) the programs with decreased resources to the extent possible and reduce funding allocations in administrative activities and not public services. If exceeded revenues are not significant enough to enhance or fund a project, funds may be placed in contingency for programming later in the year or in the next program year. Page 424 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information Page 425 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 1 Project Name HOUSING REPAIR Target Area Goals Supported Ensure a Suitable Living Environment End Homelessness Ensure Decent, Affordable Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Development and Preservation Neighborhood Revitalization Funding CDBG: $300,000 Description Maintain the affordability of decent housing for low-income Auburn residents by providing repairs necessary to maintain suitable housing for low income Auburn homeowners. Target Date 12/29/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities An estimated 50 low to moderate income families will benefit from the housing repair program. As the City's largest homeless prevention program, housing repair ensures the sustainability of a safe home for some of Auburn's most vulnerable residents. Of the 50 low to moderate income residents who apply for the program, over half of them are of the senior and disabled population. Location Description n/a Planned Activities Activities include minor home repairs. 2 Project Name ADMINISTRATION Target Area Goals Supported Planning and Administration Needs Addressed Funding CDBG: $85,578 Description General administration and project management Target Date 12/29/2017 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities n/a Location Description n/a Page 426 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities General planning and administration of the CDBG programs include: management of the housing repair program, management of all CDBG related finances, all grant reporting, monitoring of subrecipients and providing guidance of program implementation in Auburn. 3 Project Name HEALTHPOINT Target Area Goals Supported End Homelessness Needs Addressed Homeless Prevention and Intervention Funding CDBG: $32,500 Description Providing healthcare services which include medical and dental to 200 or more low to moderate income, Auburn residents. Target Date 12/29/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Over 200 low to moderate income Auburn residents will have benefitted from the proposed activities. Location Description n/a Planned Activities Activities include medical and dental services to residents of Auburn. 4 Project Name EMPLOYMENT TRAINING PROGRAM Target Area Goals Supported End Homelessness Needs Addressed Homeless Prevention and Intervention Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide employment training supportive services to approximately 15 low to moderate income Auburn residents so that at least half of them can find and sustain a job. This project is a public service. Target Date 12/29/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 15 low to moderate income Auburn residents will benefit from the employment training program. Location Description n/a Page 427 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Planned activities include employment training supportive services to Auburn residents. Page 428 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Auburn intends on distributing funds throughout the jurisdiction. Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Due to the fact that all areas of Auburn have low to moderate income families dispersed throughout the entire City, the City intends on investing throughout the entire jurisdiction to ensure that all populations throughout the region have access to beneficial programs and housing opportunities. Page 429 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Page 430 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction The City of Auburn will continue to work with service providers, the housing authority and residents in coordination to fully address and develop systems and strategies to promote their efforts in providing sustainable, affordable housing. Auburn's partnerships with organizations such as the King County Housing Authority, Master Builders Association and the Seattle King County Housing Development Consortium have allowed the City to explore new and innovative strategies to continue to offer affordable housing to its current and prospective residents. In 2017, Auburn saw the addition of over 1000 new units of multifamily housing that cater to seniors as well as low to moderate income residents. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City of Auburn will continue to look at policies that remove barriers to affordable housing. The City of Auburn's Comprehensive Land Use Plan includes several policies and objectives that will guide the city toward achieving its affordable and fair housing goals. These policies include maintaining flexibility in land use to achieve a balanced mix of affordable housing opportunities. The City will continue to pursue mixed use developments that are consistent with the transportation oriented developments located in Auburn's downtown. The City will look for opportunities with public and private agencies to implement policies and offer programs that help alleviate physical and economic distress, conserve energy resources, improve the quality and quantity of community services, and eliminate conditions that are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare. In 2017 the City of Auburn passed an ordinance that does not allow landlords of multifamily units to discriminate against potential renters based on their source of income. This means that those seeking housing with income sources such as: SSI/SSDI, Veterans Page 431 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) benefits, Section 8 vouchers, other forms of income will have the same access to housing as the rest of the community. Page 432 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) Introduction The City of Auburn will continue to work with service providers throughout the region in coordination to develop systems and strategies to promote their efforts in providing optimal, easily accessible services. The City will work to reduce the number of families in poverty, sustain relationships with employment training agencies, and work to preserve the affordable housing stock in our community. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs By establishing a strong foundation of networks between local service providers, stakeholders and government agencies through committees and coalitions, the City will work in partnership to address obstacles and ameliorate barriers to meeting underserved needs. The collaborated organizations will develop detailed strategic plans that will delegate tasks, build systems and ongoing assessment of service delivery. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The City will continue to maintain the affordability of decent housing for low income Auburn residents by allocating $300,000 of CDBG funds to the City's Housing Repair Program. The program provides emergency repairs necessary to maintain safe housing for up to 65 Auburn homeowners, many of whom are senior citizens and/or are experiencing barriers to safely accessing their homes due to physical disabilities or impairment. In addition to Auburn's Housing Repair program, the City will maintain affordable housing by continuing to engage and partner with coalitions, committees and other government agencies to integrate and enhance efforts on the issue. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards The City of Auburn will continue to implement U.S. Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) regulations to protect residents from lead-based paint hazards in housing that is financially assisted by the federal government. The requirements apply only to housing built prior to 1980, the year lead-based paint was banned nationwide for consumers. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The City of Auburn's planned actions to reduce the number of poverty- level families include but are not Page 433 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) limited to: • Allocating $10,000 to employment and training programs • Allocating more than $32,000 to healthcare services targeted at families who are uninsured or underinsured • Participate and partner with coalitions, committees and agencies that provide antipoverty services to develop and enhance strategies and efforts to reduce poverty level families • Supporting the development and sustainability of affordable multi-family housing in Auburn • Support and continue to fund programs serving families living in poverty Actions planned to develop institutional structure The City's planned actions to address the gaps and weaknesses identified in the strategic plan include: • Maintaining partnerships with and participating in the South King County Housing and Homelessness Partnership, All Home of King County and other regional human service providers, coalitions and committees who address homeless issues. The City will also continue to work collaboratively with partnering organizations and groups to integrate and enhance services to provide optimal services to individuals and families currently experiencing or at risk of homelessness. In addition the City will allocate more than $45,000 to emergency shelters and transitional housing and more than $60,000 to emergency services such as food, financial assistance, clothing and healthcare. • Take a comprehensive approach to consolidated and comprehensive planning to include all internal City departments, commissions, committees and task force. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The City of Auburn has heavily contributed and intends to continue cultivating relationships between public and private housing and social service agencies. In addition the City will continue to participate in collaborations with the South King County Forum on Homelessness, the South King County Council of Human Services, Seattle-King County Housing Development Consortium and the King County Joint Planners Meeting. In 2016 the City of Auburn started participating in Affordable Housing Week through the Housing Development Consortium along with other public and private housing agencies in King County to continue our partnerships in providing affordable housing in the region. The City will continue participation in this annual event and look for other similar opportunities to raise build partnerships to Page 434 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) support the preservation and enhanced affordability of housing in our community. Discussion The expressed goal of the City's Consolidated Plan is to reduce the number of people living in poverty within Auburn. The City intends to give funding priority to programs that, in addition to complying with federal regulations, address a priority outlined in the Consolidated Plan consistent with all of the goals and objectives identified. Page 435 of 436 Annual Action Plan 2018 27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction The City of Auburn will use all CDBG funds to support projects and activities benefiting low and moderate income residents. Funds will be used for Public Services and Planning and Administration with the remaining balance intended for housing rehab services. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) - Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% Discussion The City of Auburn will continue to use all of its funds to support residents of low/moderate income while maintaining a focus on underserved and special populations Page 436 of 436