The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6667 (2)ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 6 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON ADOPTING 2017 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A AND ADOPTING CORRESPONDING REZONES RELATED TO CERTAIN OF THE MAP AMENDMENTS AND CREATING A NEW SECTION 18.01.050 TO THE CITY CODE, RELATING TO PLANNING WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn City Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, in April 2017 the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 9, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received one private-initiated map amendment for the year 2017 annual amendments; (Nexus Youth & Families, File No. CPA17- 0002); and Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 1 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated seventeen map amendments (CPA17- 0001) and nine policy/text amendments (File No. CPA17-0001); and WHEREAS, a few of the map amendments change the existing Comprehensive Plan land use map designation and zoning classification of properties which are owned by or controlled on behalf of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and it has been the City's consistent practice to have designations in place even if they are unused; and WHEREAS, in June 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 allowing the Planning Commission and City Council to consider zoning map changes associated with comprehensive map changes (for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently, thereby eliminating the need for a subsequent hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner on the rezone (zoning map amendment) as under the previous regulations; and WHEREAS, three of the City-initiated map amendments (CPA17-0001, REZ17 0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004) and the one private initiated map amendment CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001) have an associated rezone (zoning map amendment) to maintain consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments and map amendments were processed by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2017 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP17-0014 (city-initiated Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 2 amendments) & SEP17-0012 (Nexus Youth & Families, private-initiated amendment)) and were determined to have no environmental significance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 18, 2017 and on November 1, 2017, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearings the Auburn City Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2017 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments and for certain amendments, on the associated rezone; and WHEREAS, on November 27, 2017, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2017, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 3 Section 1. Application CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from Single Family Residential" with a "Residential Transition Overlay" to "Light Commercial"; and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from "R-7, Residential" to "C-1, Light Commercial" for three parcels totaling 0.72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's November 1, 2017 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the October 24, 2017 (private-initiated) staff report, both attached as Exhibit "B". Section .2. The 2017 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map Amendments CPA17-0001) and associated rezones (REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004) are adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "C" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "C" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Section 3. The 2017 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA17-0001), as set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are adopted and approved. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "D" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts the Planning Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 4 Commission's action taken on November 1, 2017 recommending appproval, and Council further adopts the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the October 3, 2017 Group #1) and October 19, 2017 (Group #2), staff reports, attached per Exhibit "C". Section 4. The 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703; and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995; and adopted December 14, 2015 by Ordinance No. 6584. Section 5. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. Section 6. New Section to City Code. That a new Section 18.01.050 of the Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as follows: 18.01.050 How do city zoning and land use regulations relate to Indian Lands? The City of Auburn recognizes and acknowledges that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has jurisdiction and land use control over Indian Lands. The designation of city zoning and land use regulations that might appear to affect any Indian Lands does not, and is not intended to, usurp or exercise land use control over such lands. Any such city regulations are intended to identify what zoning or land-use provisions would apply to such lands were they not under Indian jurisdiction, or were the land to change in ownership or jurisdictional character. Until those circumstances change for such lands, the city regulations shall be for informational purposes only. Section 7. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 5 amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", Exhibit "D", and Exhibit"E" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 8. The City of Auburn recognizes and acknowledges that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has jurisdiction and land use control over Indian Lands. The designation of city zoning and land use regulations that might appear to affect any Indian Lands does not, and is not intended to, usurp or exercise land use control over such lands. Any such city regulations are intended to identify what zoning or land-use provisions would apply to such lands were they not under Indian jurisdiction, or were the land to change in ownership or jurisdictional character. Section 9. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: DEC 18 2017 PASSED: DEC 18 2017 APPROVED: DEC 1 8 2017 CITY OF AUBURN 3006.w.6 Na)\ c-NI cy Backu-4MAYOR Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 6 ATTEST: t4 Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4A• Pu lel B. - eid., w City Attorney Published: /.2-4.1,/,,le,7 e-sat) Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 7 Exhibit "A" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Single Family Residential" with a Residential Transition Overlay" to "Light Commercial'; for three parcels totaling 0. 72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105- 9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 for Nexus Youth & Families. (CPA 17-0002) Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Zoning Map showing a change from "R-7, Residential" to "C-1, Light Commercial" for three parcels totaling 0. 72 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077 for Nexus Youth & Families. (REZ 17-0001) Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA 17-0002"tab - Attachment 1). Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 8 10TH PL SE FSTSEH ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4881Printed On: 08/20/13 2017 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map 0 40 80 120 160 200 FEETFSTSE10TH PL SE H ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Heavy Commercial Institutional Light Commercial Residential Transition Residential Transition Overlay Single Family Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Auburn City Limits Parcels EXISTING PROPOSED Attachment 1 FSTSE10TH PL SE H ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4882Printed On: 08/20/13 2017 Proposed Zoning Plan Amendment Map 0 40 80 120 160 200 FEET 10TH PL SE FSTSEH ST SE9TH ST SE DEALSWAYSEA U B U R N W A Y S LES GOVECOMMUNITYCAMPUS C3 Heavy Commercial District I Institutional Use District C1 Light Commercial District R7 Reside ntial 7 DU/Acre Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Auburn City Limits Parcels EX ISTIN G PROPOSED Exhibit "B" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 24, 2017 - Attachment 2. CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, land use designation change from "Single Family Residential" with a "Residential Transition Overlay"to "Light Commercial'; and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from "R-7, Residential" to "C-1, Light Commercial"for three parcels totaling 0.72 acres, for Nexus Youth & Families. Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 9 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works, Planning Services Attachments: (See exhibit listing at the end of this report) Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing and recommend to City Council approval of the Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone (zoning map amendment) request. Background Information: APPLICANT: Sylvia Fuerstenberg PROPERTY OWNERS: Nexus Youth & Families Nexus Youth & Families (Parcels 192105-9142, 9145) 1000 Auburn Way South Jay & Daniel Bartholomew Auburn, WA 98002 (Parcel 192105-9077) REQUEST: File Nos. CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation of three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and the zoning (zoning map amendment) from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. Two of the three parcels are owned by Nexus Youth & Families (“Nexus”), the other is owned by Jay & Daniel Bartholomew. LOCATION: The proposal consists of three adjacent parcels located between Auburn Way S. and ‘H’ St. SE, approximately 120 ft. south of 9th St. SE. King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077. The addresses for the three parcels are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. See “Vicinity Map”, Exhibit 3, and “Ownership Map”, Exhibit 4. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Airport Finance Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Human Services Planning & CD Park Board Public Works Planning Comm. Other Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Building M&O Cemetery Mayor Finance Parks Fire Planning Legal Police Public Works Human Resources Information Services Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to Until ___/___/____ Tabled Until _ _/___/__ _ Councilmember: Staff: Meeting Date: Item Number: Attachment 2 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 2 of 10 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Applicant, Sylvia Fuerstenberg, representing Nexus Youth & Families (“Nexus”), submitted a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (City File No. CPA17-0002) and Rezone request (REZ17- 0001) applications on June 8, 2017, before the year 2017 application deadline for Comprehensive Plan amendments (June 9, 2017). 2. The City of Auburn first adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended, in 1995. The Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually each year since, generally for housekeeping items and for coordination with the Capital Facilities Plan. 3. The City of Auburn adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the GMA under Ordinance No. 6584 on December 15, 2015. 4. RCW 36.70A.130 (GMA) provides for annual amendments to locally adopted comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances, these amendments shall be considered by the City’s Legislative body no more frequently than once per year. The annual limitation and exceptions are also restated under ACC 14.22.060. Comprehensive Plan Related Findings 5. In June 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 which allows the Planning Commission and City Council to consider associated map changes (for Comp. Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently. This eliminates the need for the Hearing Examiner to subsequently consider a zoning map amendment public hearing when it is related to a Comprehensive Plan map amendment. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated comprehensive plan amendments and the general processing as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 3 of 10 recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city cou ncil. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. Per Chapter 14.22 Auburn City Code (“ACC”), privately-initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall have at least one public hearing before the Planning Commission who then forward on a recommendation to the City Council. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. Chapter 14.22 ACC ‘Comprehensive Plan’ is attached as Exhibit 6 for reference. 8. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house on the docket of comprehensive plan amendments as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. Zoning Code Related Findings 9. Chapter 18.68 ACC (Zoning) Amendments)) outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated zoning amendments and the general processing. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b), when the Planning Commission is considering a rezone (zoning map amendment) which requires a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, the public hearings shall be conducted concurrently and a recommendation on both shall be forwarded to the City Council. Chapter 18.68 ACC ‘Amendments’ is attached as Exhibit 7 for reference 10. Pursuant to Chapter 197-11 WAC and Chapter 16.06 ACC, this project is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (“SEPA”) environmental review. A Determination of Non-Significance (“DNS”), for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezone request was issued under City File No. SEP17-0012 on August 24, 2017; with the comment period ending September 8, 2017 and an appeal period ending September 22, 2017. One public comment was submitted (See Exhibit 8); no appeal was filed. 11. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Dept. of Commerce and other State agencies as required for the 60-day State review. See Exhibit 9. No comments have been received from the Dept. of Commerce or other State agencies as of the date of this report. 12. The public hearing notice was published on October 17, 2017 in the Seattle Times, at least 10 days prior to this November 1, 2017 Planning Commission public hearing. Public notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet and those requesting said notice, posting on the City’s website, and posting on the subject properties. 13. The following Staff Report and recommendation describes and addresses the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment and Rezone request by Nexus. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 4 of 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE REQUEST – STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment seeks to change the designation of three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. The three parcels total approximately 0.72 acres. See Exhibit 10 and the following vicinity map: 2. Similarly, the Rezone request seeks to change the classification of the same three parcels from “R-7, Residential Seven Dwelling Units per Acre” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. The parcels are King Co. Parcel Nos. 192105-9142, 192105-9145, and 192105-9077; and the addresses are 911 ‘H’ St. SE, 915 ‘H’ St. SE, and 921 ‘H’ St. SE. See Exhibit 11. 3. As indicated by the Applicant’s narratives (See Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13), the requested changes are to accommodate future expansion of the Nexus Youth & Families Campus. Nexus Youth & Families (formerly Auburn Youth Resources (AYR)) is a non-profit organization that provides mental health counseling for youth, groups and families through chemical dependency prevention, treatment and aftercare and homeless services of emergency shelter, intercept homeless youth through a street outreach program and provide supportive housing across South King County. The facilities at this location include a clinic, 2 administrative buildings, 2 youth shelters, storage buildings, and the Arcadia House which will be under construction soon (Arcadia House is a replacement building for an existing supportive house, which will be demolished). See Exhibit 14 for reference. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 5 of 10 4. At its ultimate buildout the Nexus Campus will intend to serve homeless youth and single mothers through provision of permanent supportive housing, clinic services, and case management and support services. Nexus has also requested in the Rezone request for a new use to be added to the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district that fully encompasses their proposed uses; this tex t amendment will be subsequently considered under a separate application and presented to Planning Commission after review of the 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been completed. 5. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation, zoning classification, and current land uses of the subject properties and surrounding properties are as follows: Comp Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential 3 single-family homes; 2 are currently used as shelters by Nexus, the other is used as a residence by the Bartholomews North “Single Family Residential” w/ “Residential Transition Overlay” R-7, Residential Single-family homes South “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Clinic East “Institutional” I, Institutional Les Gove Community Campus West “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Nexus Admin. 6. The three parcels front onto ‘H’ St. SE, which is classified as a ‘Local Residential’ street; ‘H’ St. SE is then connected to Auburn Way S (‘Principal Arterial’ classified street) via 9th St. SE (‘Local Residential’) and the unnamed alley on the north side of the project site. Part of the western portion of the alley will be widened to 20 ft. to support emergency services in conjunction with the Arcadia House construction (the alley is currently approximately 12 ft. wide). The remainder of the alley will be widened with subsequent / future development of the Nexus Campus. Circulation plans for eventual buildout would be to direct a majority of the traffic either directly onto Auburn Way S or via the alley to Auburn Way S. See the Conceptual Campus Site Plan, Exhibit 14. 7. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties have had similar single-family zoning designations since at least 1964 (note these parcels were annexed into the City in 1948). The Comprehensive Plan designation has also been single-family since at least 1960. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to provide a policy basis for potential future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent, as required by the following City Code provision: “14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan.” The City Code provides certain criteria for decisions on amending the Comprehensive Plan under ACC 18.14.22.110. These criteria are listed below, followed by a Staff Analysis in italics. The Applicant’s responses to these criteria are included in Exhibit 12. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 6 of 10 1. Criterion #1 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(1): The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent . Staff Analysis: The Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element, Page LU-9) provides the following explanation for the “Light Commercial” Land Use Designation: “Light Commercial Description This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. Such areas should encourage walkability, leisure shopping, engaging public space, and should provide other amenities conducive to attracting shoppers. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed light commercial areas buffered from more intense commercial or industrial designations by landscaping or environmental features; or 2. Located along arterial or collector streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Light Commercial Policies Policy LU-60. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and community-serving retail trade, offices, personal services, eating establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Policy LU-61. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-62. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. Policy LU-63. Multiple family dwellings are only allowed as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as within the upper stories of buildings. Policy LU-64. Drive in windows should only be allowed accessory to a permitted use, and only when carefully sited under the administrative use process, in order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not compromised. Policy LU-65. Large scale regional retail uses and uses which rely on direct access by veh icles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Policy LU-66. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Policy LU-67. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 7 of 10 Policy LU-68. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for the development associated with the request.” Per ACC 18.23.030(C), the intent of the C-1, Light Commercial zoning district is: “…intended for lower intensity commercial adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This zone generally serves as a transition zone between higher and lower intensity land uses, providing retail and professional services. This zone represents the primary commercial designation for small- to moderate-scale commercial activities compatible by having similar performance standards and should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attr acts pedestrian- oriented activities. This zone encourages leisure shopping and provides amenities conducive to attracting shoppers and pedestrians.” As identified in the C-1 intent statement above, this zoning district allows provisions for retail uses as well as professional services. Nexus does not engage in any retail or commercial uses, however, does provide professional services for homeless youth and single mothers. Nexus has also applied for a zoning text amendment to include their specific type of facility as an allowable use in the C-1 zoning district (to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a future date). Although an argument could be made that the C-1 zone may not be the most suitable location for this type of facility, looking at certain facts an argument could also be made that this is a suitable use for this location; 1) with the exception of the Bartholomew parcel, the other four parcels within the Nexus campus are already owned and operated by Nexus as similar uses (although to a much-lesser scale), 2) the campus fronts-on and has direct access to Auburn Way S, a principal arterial , 3) there is an existing Metro transit stop in front of the Arcadia House, 4) the campus has an intervening alley right- of-way to the north, providing a delineated buffer to the existing single-family homes, and 5) there are existing public services and facilities located in close proximity to the campus, including the library, community center, and Nexus’ other service (e.g. clinic) that the homeless occupants could utilize. Other applicable policies from the City’s Comprehensive Plan that support the Nexus application are as follows: From the ‘Core Plan’: Policy 11. Participate in and support efforts to provide solutions for persons experiencing homelessness. Policy LU-30. Encourage development of permanent supportive housing to address the homeless population and those with special needs. Policy H-10. Provide a land use plan and zoning that offers opportunities to achieve a variety of housing styles and densities for private and non-profit housing providers. Policy H-31. Encourage and support human and health service organizations that offer programs and facilities for people with special needs. Support programs in particular that help people to remain within the community, including those that are veterans, disabled, seniors, single parent households, and the homeless. Policy H-43. Work with other jurisdictions and health and social service organizations to implement a coordinated, regional approach to homelessness. Policy H-47. Support nonprofit organizations during all stages of siting and project planning and when applying for county, state, and federal funding. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 8 of 10 2. Criterion #2 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(2): Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased. Staff Analysis: The proposed application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation has been reviewed by the City’s Utilities, Traffic division, and the Valley Regional Fire Authority. Based on these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. As is typical with development in the City, adequate infrastructure improvements will be required to be provided concurrent with future development. Although no specific construction activity is proposed or permitted with this amendment, eventual buildout of these three parcels in relation to the overall Nexus Campus is not anticipated to be detrimental to public services. Traffic impacts will be reviewed once the campus planning by the applicant has been finalized to ensure accurate mitigation measures are provided (through Applicant preparation and City review of a Traffic Impact Analysis). 3. Criterion #3 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(3): Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff Analysis: While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the Applicant’s request to change three parcels from residential to commercial designations are not out of character with the designations or uses in the immediate vicinity. The Nexus Campus is bordered on three sides by public rights-of-way and to the south is a City-owned parking lot. The requested change is a logical expansion of the Light Commercial land use for this particular use. 4. Criterion #4 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(4): A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff Analysis: The proposed change is for three parcels to Light Commercial which is consistent with the adjacent parcels to the south and west, all of which are also owned by Nex us. A change in conditions or circumstances would be the ever-increasing number of homeless people. Nexus seeks to help with the especially vulnerable homeless populations, the youth/young adults and single mothers. Also, as stated under Criterion #1, above, the Comprehensive Plan lists numerous goals/policies to address homelessness. 5. Criterion #5 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(5): If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region. Staff Analysis: The change, if approved, would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), the King County Countywide Planning Policies and Vision 2040. The proposal is consistent because it furthers provision of services and housing for the homeless population. 6. Criterion #6 – ACC 14.22.110(A)(6): If the request is to change the land use designation of a specific property on the comprehensive plan land use map, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff Analysis: The requested change is consistent with item b in that the adjacent properties to the west and south are designated Light Commercial. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 9 of 10 REZONE RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The Applicant has requested a rezone from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b) if the rezone request also requires changes to the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and make a recomm endation to the City Council. Chapter 18.68 ACC contains the intent and process for zoning code amendments, in this case a site -specific zoning map amendment has been requested. Auburn City Code does not contain any specific rezone criteria for City Staff to review; however, Case Law offers some rezone criteria (“A Little Bit Pregnant: The Multi- Personalities of Site Specific Rezones - Or - A Cheat Sheet for Everything You Need to Know about Site- Specific Rezones”, by Phil Olbrechts on mrsc.org, April 1, 2013) as follows: “…require that the proponents of a rezone must establish that conditions have substantially changed since the original adoption and that the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. If a rezone implements the comprehensive plan, a showing that a change of circumstances has occurred is not required.” With the change in City procedures by ordinance No. 6655 to allow concurrent recommendations by the Planning Commission on both the Comprehensive plan and zoning map changes, the recommendations on each should be consistent and therefore does not need to show a change in circumstances has occurred. The requested rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals and welfare. Adequate public facilities such as water, sewer, and electricity, are capable of being provided for the parcels upon future development and would therefore not be detrimental to public health. The rezone itself is not anticipated to allow any uses or acts that would pose any detrimental effects on the morals or welfare of the public; the uses planned by Nexus for future development of the campus would be a benefit to the community by serving a vulnerable population. As for impacts to public safety, the proposed Nexus facilities could be seen to have favorable or unfavorable impacts. Providing services for homeless youth could attract users to the neighborhood that may not typically be there, however, the services are also intended to assist homeless youth to provide shelter and integrate into productive society. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of the Nexus Youth & Families request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment for three parcels from “Single Family Residential” with a “Residential Transition Overlay” to “Light Commercial”; and a rezone from “R-7, Residential” to “C-1, Light Commercial”. EXHIBIT LIST: (Please see the last divider in the ‘working binder’ for these exhibits.) Exhibit 1. CPA17-0002 and REZ17-0001 Staff Report Exhibit 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Exhibit 3. Rezone Application Exhibit 4. Vicinity Map Exhibit 5. Ownership Map Exhibit 6. Chapter 14.22 ACC Exhibit 7. Chapter 18.68 ACC Exhibit 8. SEPA Comment Letter Exhibit 9. Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter, received August 22, 2017 Exhibit 10. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Maps Agenda Subject: CPA17-0002 & REZ17-0001, Nexus Youth & Families Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment and Rezone Date: October 24, 2017 Page 10 of 10 Exhibit 11. Rezone Maps Exhibit 12. Comprehensive Plan Written Statement from Applicant Exhibit 13. Rezone Written Statement from Applicant Exhibit 14. Conceptual Nexus Campus Plan Exhibit 15. Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance Exhibit 16. Notice of Public Hearing -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 10 Exhibit "C" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 3, 2017 (Group #1) Attachment 3 . Agenda bill/staff report dated October 19, 2017 (Group #2) Attachment 4. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA17-0001 – City Initiated) CPM #1 - Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map. "The R-10, R-16 and R- 20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). (See also related P/T #6) CPM #2 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 2.23-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. CPM #3 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 4 privately-owned, previously developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" to recognize and be more compatible with developed status of the properties at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution and outdoor storage. CPM #4 - Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately- owned developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Parcel owned by Quality Fence Co. and located on south side of 21st ST SE, 390 feet east of A ST SE. CPM #5 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately owned and 1 city-owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Parcels are located at the SW corner of Main and Division Street. CPM #6 - Change the mapped land use designation of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117 & 8581400530. CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal jurisdiction parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. The 3 parcels controlled by the Muckleshoot Tribe are developed as a cemetery and thus, the land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Both parcels are located on east side of A ST SE, south of Lakeland Hills WY SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 11 land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. CPM #9 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". Both parcels are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #10 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Parcel is located 130 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL. (30811 124TH AVE SE). Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #11 - Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel is located south of SR 18 at west end of 8th ST SW. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #12 - Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel is located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #13 - Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcels are located on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #14 - Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Parcels are at various locations in downtown. Some are City-owned; others are privately owned. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #15 - Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Parcels are at various locations. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. CPM #16 - Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with rest of the plat. Parcel is owned by the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. CPM #17 - Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel is located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation. AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 15 Agenda Subject CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Group # 1, City Initiated Plan Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: See separate text & map amendment sections of working binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of Group #1 of the 2017 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015 the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating: Nine policy/text amendments Seventeen map amendments Also, the city received one private-initiated plan map amendment by the submittal deadline which will be presented in a separate staff report in advance of a subsequent hearing. Due to the number of amendments and Planning Commission’s request to phase consideration, this staff report and recommendation addresses a portion of the amendments (Group #1) and specifically: Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments P/T # 1 through # 9 and Map Amendments # 1 through # 3. The remaining amendments will be addressed in subsequently provided staff reports and scheduled for a subsequent hearing(s) before the Planning Commission. In terms of process, the Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: October 18, 2017 Item Number: Attachment 3 Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 2 of 15 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 9, 2017 deadline for the submittal of private-initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in April 2017. The City received one private-initiated map amendment by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are proposed to be incorporated by reference in the current Capital Facilities Element (Volume 3), of the 2015 Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review decision under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared separately by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by state law. 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the remaining amendments, the City Capital Facilities Plan, and the remaining policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City- initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 19, 2017 (City File # SEP17- 0014). The comment period ended October 3, 2017 and the appeal period ended October 17, 2017. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 3 of 15 b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. 8. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 25, 2017 by letter and Material ID #24153. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. A copy of the transmittal and acknowledgement is provided in the working binder. 9. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 10. The notice of public hearing was published on October 5, 2017 in the Seattle Times Newspaper which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 18, 2015. A copy of the request to publish is provided in the working binder. Also, a notice was mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendments. 11. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text (P/T) and Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s October 18, 2017 public hearing with a staff recommendation. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 4 of 15 Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) P/T #1 Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2017-2023. The CFP was prepared by the district staff and adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Directors on June 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  six–year enrollment projections  Auburn school district level of service standards  An inventory of existing facilities  The district’s overall capacity of the 6-year period  District capital construction Plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,321.86, a decrease of $2,147.51 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $2,081.29, an increase of $441.59. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 to the City Council. P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018 - 2023. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on May 30, 2017. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following: Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 5 of 15  Overview  An inventory of existing facilities  six–year enrollment projections  standard of service  Capacity projects  Finance plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,760.00, an increase of $360.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,081.00; a decrease of $678.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #3 Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2018 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2018. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board July 25, 2017 by Resolution No. 2017-12. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  Introduction  Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities  Needs forecast, existing & new facilities  Six–year finance plan  Maps of district boundaries  Building capacities & portable locations  Student forecast  Capacity summaries  Impact fee calculations  Summary of changes from the 2017 plan A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,842.00, representing an increase of $3,644.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,086.00, Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 6 of 15 an increase of $11,700.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. According to communication from Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster of the Federal Way Public Schools, there are several factors which have driven the impact fees to increase quite significantly in this plan. One factor is the steady increase in observed multiple-family student generation rates. In 2015, the first of three multi-family developments was opened and fully occupied in the City of Federal Way. The second was opened and occupied in late 2016 and the third was opened in fully occupied this summer. The first two developments have been included in the generation rate calculation for this plan. The specific generation rates can be found on Page 29. These multiple-family complexes are generating more than one student per unit which is significantly higher than past developments within the school district. In addition to the high student generation rates, the district completed work with its Facilities Planning Committee which determined a need for additional capacity at a number of schools. As a result of this work, Phase II of the District’s plan will be placed on the November ballot for a bond request. The facilities impacted during Phase II can be found on Page 7 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Anticipated funding for this project can be found on the Six-Year Finance Plan on Page 9. The Finance Plan outlines the anticipated timeline for beginning and completion of the various projects. It is important to note that not all projects within Phase II will create additional capacity. Only costs associated with increasing needed capacity are used in the formula for calculating Impact Fees. The specific cost calculations are outlined on Page 32 of the Capital Facilities Plan. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Federal Way School District’s 2018 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T #4 Incorporate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on April 26, 2017 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following:  Executive Summary  Six-year enrollment projection & history  District standard of service  Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools  Six-year planning & construction plan Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 7 of 15  Portable classrooms  Projected classroom capacity  Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules  Summary of changes to previous plan A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,100.00$4,990.00, representing a decrease increase of $110.00 $496.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $2,210.00 $2,163.00, a increase decrease of $47.00$1,215.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 to the City Council. P/T #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA requires the following: “A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.” Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 8 of 15 A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The memo dated September 27, 2017 prepared by the City’s Finance Department contained in the working binder highlights the major changes in the CFP from last year’s CFP by projects completed (removed) and projects added. The City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 is proposed to be incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element (Volume No. 3). Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 to the City Council. P/T #6 Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-6 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Mixed Use”. This designation is found under the heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2), so it is appropriately predominantly a “residential” designation. This focus is reinforced by the stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of the Comprehensive Plan, which say: “Description This category shall be applied to those areas that are either now developed or are reserved for multiple family dwellings. Densities may range from 20 to 24 units per acre. These communities are served by transit, have non-motorized connections to surrounding amenities and services, or have access to on-site nonresidential amenities and services.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed high-density residential; or 2. Properties that are connected to single-family and nonresidential designations by the Residential Transition designation or are adjacent to the Multifamily designation, and meet the development parameters of the mixed-use designation.” However, the R-10, R-16, and R-20 Residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & other uses) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 9 of 15 Table 18.07.020 Permitted Use Table – Residential Zoning Designations (Excerpt) Also, at Section ACC 18.04.625, the Code provides the following definition of “mixed use development”: “18.04.625 Mixed-use development. “Mixed-use development” means a single unified development that incorporates the planned integration of two or more different land uses consisting of some combination of office, light industrial, hotel, retail, entertainment, public uses, along with residential uses. Mixed-use development may be vertically oriented in one or more buildings, or horizontally distributed on a development site. When horizontally distributed, the different uses may be constructed concurrently and in separate phases, and should incorporate common and/or complementary features and/or elements such as pedestrian walkways, access driveways, parking areas, architectural themes, or other techniques that provide integration between uses on the site.” The Comprehensive plan language goes on to provide that this designation would be implemented by the “Mixed Use Residential” zoning district. This zoning classification does not currently exist and there are no properties that have this zoning classification or a “Mixed Use” land use map designation; therefore elimination of the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map does not negatively affect any properties. It also does not reduce development potential since mixed use is already allowed by the zoning code. Mixed use is currently allowed in the same areas that are described as appropriate for the designation. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 10 of 15 Staff does not question the value of having portions of the city where mixed use development is allowed, but does not require a unique comprehensive plan designation to achieve. See exhibit: “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 4. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan to the City Council, as presented by staff. P/T #7 Add text to add back the R-5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family Residential" Land Use Designation. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-4 provides for a mapped land use designation of “Single Family Residential”. This designation is found under the heading of “Residential Land Use Designations” (Page LU-2). The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation provides: “Description This designation is the predominant land use category in the City. Maintaining and creating a diverse arrangement of interconnected subdivisions, neighborhoods, and communities that have a mix of densities and housing types; linkages with other residential areas and commercial hubs through non-motorized modes, such as pedestrian and bicycling, and vehicular modes will be encouraged.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed single-family residential areas; 2. Undeveloped areas that do not meet the designation criteria for other Residential, Commercial, Industrial, or Public/Quasi- Public designations; or 3. Residential Conservancy areas that contain limited critical areas, are served by public utilities (water, sewer, storm services), and meet the development parameters of the single-family designation.” “Implementing Zoning Designations Residential 1 (1 dwelling unit per acre): All properties located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-1, as consistent with King County county-wide planning policies. Residential 7 (7 dwelling units per acre): All properties not located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-7.” The R-5 Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification is not currently identified as an implementing zoning district for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. A significant portion of the city is zoned R-5, Residential. In the 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation and must be corrected by Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 11 of 15 adding wording to list the R-5. Residential (Five dwelling units per acre) zoning classification as an implementing zoning district for the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. Some other minor wording corrections proposed by staff are also shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 1. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to add a listing of R-5 Residential zoning district as an implementing zone of the “Single Family Residential” land use designation. P/T #8 Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". It is requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide more logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. It is requested to revert to the pre-2015 title of the category since the ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ remain similar. The stated ‘description’ and ‘designation criteria’ of this land use designation in the 2015 Plan provides: “Description Residential transition areas are planned to accommodate moderate densities of varying residential dwelling types. Varying intensities within a transition area may be permitted based on adjacent density, intensity, and/or character. Appropriate densities in these areas range from 7 to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single-family dwelling to multiple-family dwellings, with larger structures allowed (within the density range) where offsetting community benefits can be identified.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed moderate density residential areas; or 2. Areas that provide a transition between single-family and multifamily, single-family and nonresidential, multifamily and nonresidential zones or development are adjacent and meet the development parameters of the Residential Transition designation.” The reversion back to the former name provides a more logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. The name change also avoids confusion that would likely occur to potential users by the similarly sounding “Residential Transition Overlay” that was also part of the changes made in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. Also, the description does not provide for any different uses to serve as a ‘transition’, only intermediate residential densities. Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 12 of 15 Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" P/T #9 Add the "R-10, Residential" and R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Areas of the city are zoned "R-10, Residential" but no areas are currently zoned "R-16, Residential". However, in the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comprehensive Plan land use designation. To be corrected by adding R-10 and R-16 as implementing zones to either the "Residential Transition" or "Moderate Density" Land Use Designation. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-5 provides for a land use designation of “Residential Transition”. This was formerly the “Moderate Density Residential” designation prior to adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan in 2015. The title of the category is proposed to change as requested in the preceding text amendment, P/T #8. The implementing zones "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed to be added as implementing zoning districts. The City currently contains properties zoned R- 10 Residential; however, there are no properties currently zoned R-16, Residential. The R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential are not currently identified as implementing zoning districts for any comprehensive plan land use designation and needs to be. The "R-10, Residential" and "R-16, Residential" are proposed as implementing zoning districts for the “Moderate Density Residential” land use designation. Some other minor corrections to the wording of this section as proposed by staff are shown. See exhibit “Excerpt of Volume 1 – Land Use Element”, Page 2. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a text amendment to add a listing of R-10 Residential and R-16 Residential zoning districts as implementing zones of the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #1 Remove the discussion of a “Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and remove category from the Land Use Map (See P/T #6, above). The R-10, R-16 and R-20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table). Thus it was unnecessary to establish a unique land use designation to achieve a zoning district to allow. Discussion (This is the same topic as text amendment P/T #6, but is repeated as a map amendment since it requires revision to both the text and map of the comprehensive Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 13 of 15 plan document. See discussion and analysis under text amendment P/T #6. Also, note that a map is not provided as an exhibit since the “Mixed Use” is not shown on the map except in the legend because it does not apply to any properties.) Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to remove the "Mixed Use" land use designation from the Comprehensive Plan map (Map No. 1.1). CPM #2 Change the mapped land use designation of a 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional". Parcel No. 0921059073 is located south of SE 310th ST, 820 feet west of 124th Ave SE. Discussion The 0.98-acre property was part of a larger 2.23-acre property ownership by Schneider Homes Inc. that was proposed for development as the Pasafino Apartments while in unincorporated King County prior to annexation to the City of Auburn. In 1996 a ‘Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed between the City and Schneider Homes Inc. in order for the City to provide water and sewer services outside the city limits, but within the city’s established utility service area, to the proposed apartment development. An ‘Amended Petition for Annexation Agreement and Declaration of Covenant’ was executed between the City and Schneider Homes Inc. on April 21, 1997. The Agreements provided that as a condition of the City providing utility services, Schneider Homes Inc. would develop a park to city standards and after annexation, convey the developed park land to the City of Auburn without obligation or cost. At the time of transfer, the city parks department would assume maintenance responsibility. The property was annexed to the City of Auburn effective in 2008 by Ordinance No. 6121, however, the transfer of ownership of the park land did not take place for many more years since the park land was not a separate parcel that could be deeded separately to the City. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application (File No. BLA14-0005) was filed by Schneider Homes Inc. in May of 2014 to establish the park land as a separate parcel. The processing of the BLA was delayed due to changes in property ownership interest on the part of Schneider Homes Inc. for refinancing purposes. The BLA was subsequently approved by the City and recorded on November 2, 2016 (Recording No. 20161102900004) and the property subsequently conveyed to the City. It was previously appropriate to have the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of “Multiple “Family Residential" applicable to the site when it was privately-owned and part of a larger property that is mainly developed with apartments. However, now that Parcel No. 0921059073 is a separate parcel that is owned by the City and developed for park purposes, it is appropriate for it to have an “Institutional” land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan consistent with other park properties. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change the mapped land use designation of 0.98-acre city-owned park parcel (Parcel No. 0921059073) from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Institutional" (Map No 1.1). Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 14 of 15 CPM #3 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of four privately-owned, previously- developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 5401600200 (0.06 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) are owned by Ho & Nancy Kim. Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) is owned by CHS Inc. Parcel No. 5401600260 (0.24 acres) is owned by Gary & Karen Stamps. This proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use map designation to recognize and be more compatible with developed status of the properties located at the perimeter of the land use designation. The sites contain existing uses of warehouses, bulk propane tank distribution, and outdoor storage. Discussion This is a city-initiated comprehensive plan map amendment to change a group of four adjacent, privately-owned and mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial". The purpose of this change is to recognize and be more compatible with the developed status of the properties. The characteristics of the affected parcels are as follows: Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Current Land Use 5401600175/ 232 C ST NW Ho & Nancy Kim 0.7 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former Dels Farm Supply consisting of 5,238 sq ft of warehouse & 1,500 sq ft of attached office/store. Currently unoccupied/ 5401600200/ (No address) Ho & Nancy Kim 0.06 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Former railroad spur line bisecting parcel -0200 currently vacant 5401600235/ 301 2nd ST NW CHS Inc. 0.34 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Cenex bulk propane storage tanks 5401600260/ (No address) Gary & Karen Stamps 0.24 acres Downtown Urban Center DUC, Downtown Urban Center Parking lot /vacant The sites have a “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation by the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned DUC, Downtown Urban Center. The contiguous sites are located at the northern edge of the “Downtown Urban Center" land use designation and bordered to the north and the east by properties with an industrial designation. The sites align in a row north to south and are bordered by public streets of C ST NW to the west; 3rd ST NW to the north and by the Burlington Northern railroad to the east. The automobile body shop of A-1 Collision borders the sites to the south. The two largest parcels, Parcel No. 5401600175 (0.7 acres) and Parcel No. 5401600235 (0.34 acres) have been developed for more than 25 years with structures and facilities that are more appropriate characterized as “industrial uses” than suburban downtown development. The configuration and location of the properties sandwiched between transportation corridors makes them less suitable for redevelopment as downtown Agenda Subject: CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #1 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments & Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 3, 2017 Page 15 of 15 service or retail type uses geared to leisure shopping. Also, due to the number of zoning inquiries, the City staff has increasing become aware of the difficulty of the property owner in finding tenants that can occupy the former farm supply building and meet the zoning use regulations of the DUC zoning district. Also, few uses are capable of using the building with limited physical alterations in order to avoid triggering consistency with Downtown Design Standards and significant upgrades. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change a group of four privately-owned, mostly developed parcels from "Downtown Urban Center" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 5401600175, 5401600200, 5401600235, and 5401600260) AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 34 Agenda Subject CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Group # 2, City-Initiated Plan Map Amendments and associated rezones REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003, & REZ17-0004 Date: October 19, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works, Planning Services Div. Attachments: See Exhibit list at end of report and the separate text & map amendment sections of working binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of Group #2 of the 2017 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and associated rezones (zoning map amendments). Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015 the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating: 9 policy/text amendments 17 map amendments Also, the city received one private-initiated plan map amendment by the submittal deadline which will be presented in a separate staff report in advance of a subsequent hearing. Due to the number of amendments and Planning Commission’s request to phase consideration, this staff report and recommendation addresses a portion of the amendments (Group #2) and specifically: Map Amendments # 4 through # 17. These map amendments are the remaining amendments that were not part of Group #1, previously addressed at the Planning Commission’s October 19, 2017 meeting. In terms of process, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: November 1, 2017 Item Number: Attachment 4 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 2 of 34 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 9, 2017 deadline for the submittal of private-initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in April 2017. The City received one private-initiated map amendment by the submittal deadline. This private-initiated amendment is addressed in a separate staff report (File No. CPA17-0002). 3. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 19, 2017 (City File # SEP17-0014). The comment period ended October 3, 2017 and the appeal period ended October 17, 2017. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder. 4. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 3 of 34 shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 5. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. 6. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) and other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 25, 2017 by letter and Material ID #24153. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. A copy of the transmittal by the City and written acknowledgement of receipt by Commerce is provided in the working binder. 7. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for conducting a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 8. The notice of public hearing was published on October 21, 2017 in the Seattle Times Newspaper which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 1, 2017. A copy of the request to publish is provided in the working binder. Also, a notice was mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record. 9. Many of these comprehensive plan changes are corrections to the mapped land use designations made after adoption of the updated comprehensive plan in 2015. The changes increase the consistency of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning as required by ACC 14.22.050, “Conformance and Consistency”. The maps related to these proposed changes are also available to review in the ‘Comp. Plan Map Amendments’ tab of the ‘Working Binder’. 10. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s November 1, 2017 public hearing with a staff recommendation. All of the Policy/Text (P/T) amendments were presented at the October meeting; so no Policy/Text (P/T) amendments are described in this report. CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 4 of 34 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA17-0001, City initiated) CPM #4 Change the mapped land use designation of south part of 2.15-acre, privately-owned, developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial". Discussion The 2.15-acre property was previously a smaller parcel and the comprehensive plan designation boundary followed this original property boundary. In 2004, a boundary line adjustment application was filed (File No. LLA04-0010), approved by the City, and recorded (Recording No. 20040712003209). The boundary line adjustment expanded the parcel boundary to include additional area to the south. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation boundary was not simultaneously changed to correspond to the property boundary change. In the intervening time, the fence contractor business has using the expansion area as part of their yard. It is appropriate to make the change to avoid split designation of a parcel where warranted by existing development pattern and setting. The “Residential Transition” designation makes up a smaller portion of the lot, while the balance is used by a fencing contractor. As shown on the map below, the designation change is consistent with adjacent property located to the west. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #4 to change the mapped land use designation of the southern part of a 2.15-acre, privately-owned, parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Heavy Commercial" (Parcel No. 8695200020). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 5 of 34 CPM #5 Change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels (2 privately-owned and 1 city- owned) from the "Open Space" to "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned parcels, Nos. 7815700095 (0.17 acres – vacant) and 7815700135 (0.33 acres – parking lot) are owned by Levan Auburn Development LLC and the City-owned Parcel No. 7815700085 (0.19 acres - Plaza park). These contiguous properties are located at the SW corner of W Main ST and Division ST. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 6 of 34 Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. It is requested to revert to former designation of "Downtown Urban Center". These 3 mostly undeveloped parcels are currently zoned “DUC, Downtown Urban Center”. Due to their location in the heart of the city center and economic development potential, these parcels should have the designation "Downtown Urban Center". Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 7815700095 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.17 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Vacant lot 7815700135 Levan Auburn Development LLC 0.33 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” Parking lot 7815700085 City of Auburn 0.19 acres “Open Space” “DUC, Downtown Urban Center” City’s Plaza Park Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #5 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Downtown Urban Center" land use designation. (Parcel Nos. 7815700095, 7815700135, & 7815700085) CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 7 of 34 CPM #6 Change the mapped land use designation (and zoning district) of 46 city-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 46 parcels 46 city- owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation. Parcel Nos. 0821059017, 7345300160, 6347000055, 6347000065, CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 8 of 34 0001000081, 1313500310, 3021059044, 3021059080, 3021059089, 1421049011, 1821059117, 0520061060, 0721059038, 7749501070, 0521059010, 0521059029, 0421059062, 0421059061, 0421059060, 0421059071, 0421059004, 3845000080, 7299602140, 4137070990, 7002181950, 0520051035, 0520051006, 0921059018, 6655000105, 6655000021, 1421049067, 9262800330, 9262800341, 1421049017, 9262800285, 0721059020, 8669150810, 6655000024, 6655000030, 3021059325, 3121059017, 3021059375, 8581400530, 1821059327, 0821059017, & 0621059007 are scattered at various sites. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are city–owned developed parks and contain play areas and active recreational space. And the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. cemeteries and active and mainly developed parks should not be designated "Open Space"). Also, for most parcels the zoning map classification also needs to change from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #6 to change the mapped land use designation of multiple City-owned, parks properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification, except for Parcel Nos. 1821059327, 1821059117, & 8581400530 which are already zoned: “I, Institutional”. CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 9 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 10 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 11 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 12 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 13 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 14 of 34 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 15 of 34 CPM #7 - Change the mapped land use designation of 3 Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Also, change the zoning designation from “OS, Open Space” to “I, Institutional” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal parcels from the "Open Space" to the "Institutional" Land Use designation. Parcel No. 2021059041 (1.45 acres US Government)), 2021059047 (24.46 acres, Tribe), & 2021059037 (0.07 acres, Tribe) are proposed for change. With adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its associated map changes, the properties were assigned an CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 16 of 34 “Open Space” land use designation. These properties are Muckleshoot Tribal owned properties that are developed as cemeteries. And the “Open Space” land use designation is not appropriate to apply to these properties based on the discussion and clarification that occurred with the Planning Commission during discussion of the “OS, Open Space zoning district in July and August of this year. The land use designation is inconsistent with the designation criteria and purpose of the "Open Space" land designation of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. cemeteries and active and mainly developed parks should not be designated "Open Space"). Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2021059041 US Government 1.45 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Historic Tribal cemetery 2021059047 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 24.46 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Tribal Cemetery 2021059037 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 0.07 acres “Open Space” “P1, Public Use”’ Street frontage portion of historic Tribal cemetery Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #7 to change the mapped land use designation of 3 Muckleshoot Tribal properties from "Open Space" to "Institutional" land use designation and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0002), to correspond to the “I, Institutional” implementing zoning classification (Parcel Nos. 2021059041, 2021059047, & 2021059037). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 17 of 34 CPM #8 - Change the mapped land use designation of 2 parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" Parcels Nos. are 3121059069, 1.79 acres owned by Alan Clayton and Parcel No. 3121059027, 3.67 acres, owned by John Nixon. Both are located on east side of A ST SE, approx. 600 feet south of Lakeland Hills WY SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 18 of 34 change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan adoption. It is requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Light Commercial". Also, change the zoning designation from “R5, Residential” to “C1, Light Commercial” to agree. Both properties were annexed to the City of Auburn from the City of Pacific in the year 2003 by City of Auburn Ordinance No. 3643. Prior to the annexation, the northern parcel (owned by Mr. Clayton) was zoned “C, Commercial” and the southern parcel (now owned by John Nixon) was zoned “RMH, Multiple Family Residential” in the City of Pacific. Mr. Clayton’s zoning designation of “C, Commercial” was a result of an application for zone change requested by Mr. Clayton and approved by the City of Pacific in August of 1992 by Ordinance No. 1177 (The rezone was to the zoning classification of “BC, Business Commercial” which subsequently became “C, Commercial”.) At annexation to the City of Auburn, the property assumed an “R-5, Residential” zoning designation by default, while the comprehensive plan designation was made “Light Commercial”. Of late, Mr. Clayton has been contacting the City almost annually requesting that the city initiate a change in the zoning designation back to a commercial category. He has always had the ability to submit a private application to initiate the zoning map change himself, and has been advised of this, but was reluctant. The ‘working binder’ under the ‘Map Amendments’ tab and CPM #8, contains a letter from Mr. Clayton dated July 18, 2017 and supporting information in which he describes the history and his request to have the zoning changed. The southern parcel prior to 2015 had a comprehensive plan designation of “Light Commercial” and was previously was zoned “R-5, Residential”. These 2 parcels are the only parcels on the east side of A ST SE, in the vicinity that have a Comprehensive Plan designation of “Single Family Residential”. The adjacent properties to the south were changed to “light Industrial” due to private com plan application last year. The properties to the north have a comprehensive plan designation of “Institutional”. While the comprehensive plan designation was changed in 2015 to “Single Family Residential”, to align with the property’s R-5 Residential zoning, it is the zoning classification that should have been changed. The City now seeks to rectify the circumstances by changing the both the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for both parcels Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 3121059069 (northern) Alan B Clayton 1.79 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential vacant 3121059027/ 5340 A ST SE (southern) John Nixon 3.67 acres “Single Family Residential” R-5, Residential Single family residence Staff Recommendation CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 19 of 34 Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #8 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" and to change the zoning designation (File No. REZ17-0004) to correspond to the “C1, Commercial” implementing zoning classification. Parcels Nos. are 3121059069 and Parcel No. 3121059027 CPM #9 Change the mapped land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE from "Multiple Family Residential: to "Light Commercial". CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 20 of 34 Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 2 privately owned vacant parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". The 1.75 -acre Parcel No. 0921059042 owned by Highlane Prop. LLP and 0.81-acre parcel No. 0921059113 owned by Jennifer & James Hunt both are located at SE corner of SE 312th ST & 121st PL SE. The change is requested to remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of 2015 plan and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 0921059042 Highlane Prop. LLP 1.75 - acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant 0921059113 Jennifer & Eric Hunt 0.81-acre "Multiple Family Residential” “C1, Light Commercial” Vacant Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #9 to change 2 privately-owned parcels from "Multiple Family Residential” to "Light Commercial". (Parcels Nos. are 0921059042 and 0921059113). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 21 of 34 CPM #10 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately owned 0.91-acre parcel near the intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately owned 0.91- acre parcel containing a single family house from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential". The Parcel No. 0921059101 is owned by Ram Singh Dhaliwal is located 130 feet south of intersection of 124th AV SE & SE 307th PL (Address is 30811 CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 22 of 34 124th AVE SE). The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of map amendment CPM #10 to change the land use designation of a 0.91-acre parcel from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Single Family Residential" (Parcel No. 0921059101). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 23 of 34 CPM #11 Change the mapped land use designation of a privately-owned, 13.84 -acre parcel addressed as 521 - 8TH ST SW. from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately 13.84 -acre parcel developed with a single 286,000 square foot multiple tenant warehouse from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial". Parcel No. 1321049019 is owned by Western B NW WA LLC and located south of State Route 18 (SR) at the west end of 8th ST SW (Address is 521 8TH ST SW .) The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #11 to change the land use designation of an approximately 13.84-acre parcel from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial" (Parcel No. 1321049019). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 24 of 34 CPM #12 Change the mapped land use designation of 7.2-acre private parcel located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private developed parcel from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel No. 5530200000, owned by Lois Maathuis, is located NW of intersection of Mill Pond DR SE and Kennedy AV SE. The site is CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 25 of 34 developed as a series of 13 multiple-family, 2-story buildings containing a total of 102 dwelling units, known as the ‘Mill Pond at Lakeland Condominiums’. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #12 to change the land use designation of privately-owned approximately of 7.2-acre private parcel developed with condominiums from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". (Parcel No. 5530200000). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 26 of 34 CPM #13 Change the mapped land use designation of a group of 10 adjacent parcels located north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" and with “Residential Transition Overlay” to "Multiple Family Residential". Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197 are owned by various property owners & located on the north side of Auburn WY S, east of Academy DR SE. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Parcel ID Number/ address Property owner Parcel Size (Approx.) Current Comprehensive Plan Designation Current Zoning Classification Current Land Use 2721059053 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.22 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059063 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.06 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Access Tract 2721059066 Orrozco, Salvador and Val 0.23 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059126 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.52 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059156 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.39 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059157 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.36 acres “Single Family Residential” with “Residential Transition Overlay” “R-20, Residential” Duplex 2721059162 Huang, Angelina and Yao 0.63 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059168 Bunkhan, Chakkaphan and Suphawan 0.19 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Single Family Residence 2721059179 Muckelshoot Tribe 0.42 acres “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Triplex 2721059197 Muckleshoot Tribe 0.23 “Single Family Residential” “R-20, Residential” Duplex CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 27 of 34 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #13 to change the land use designation of a group of 10 contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel Nos. 2721059053, 2721059063, 2721059066, 2721059126, 2721059156, 2721059157, 2721059162, 2721059168, 2721059179, & 2721059197). CPM #14 Change the mapped land use designation of 23 parcels located at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 28 of 34 Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center". Some are City- owned; others are privately owned. Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040. Remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation with adoption of map as part of 2015 plan. Requested to revert to pre-2015 designation of "Downtown Urban Center". The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #14 to change the land use designation of 23 parcels at various locations in downtown from "Institutional" to "Downtown Urban Center" (Parcel Nos. 0492000460, 0492000461, 0492000463, 7816200100, 7816200060, 0498500005, 0492500100, 0303450000, 0492500240, 0492500275, 0492500260, 0483000085, 0483000080, 0489000040, 7331400135, 0489000005, 7331400460, 7331400485, 7331400486, 7331400500, 8698100030, 8698100035, & 8698100040). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 29 of 34 CPM #15 Change the mapped land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills community from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. The location of the parcels within the CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 30 of 34 Lakeland special planning area is shown on the map. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #15 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of numerous parcels within the Lakeland Hills South PUD from "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential" and to “Multiple Family Residential”. CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 31 of 34 CPM #16 Change the mapped land use designation of 0.21-acre city-owned stormwater facility on the south side of 35th St SE, from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of a 0.21-acre city- owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" to agree with designation applicable to the balance of the plat. Parcel No. 1877100170 is owned by the City and located on south side of 35th St SE, 290 feet west of D ST SE. The lot for the stormwater facility was created from the "D ST SE Plat" and should retain the same comprehensive plan designation as the balance of the plat. It is not the intention of the Comprehensive Plan designation to apply a separate classification to each special purpose lot or tract needed to support the overall subdivision. Land use designations should apply to broad geographic areas based on compatibility and generally not on an individual parcel basis. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #16 to change the land use designation of change the land use designation of 0.21-acre city- owned stormwater facility serving a plat from "Institutional" to "Multiple Family Residential" (Parcel No. 1877100170). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 32 of 34 CPM #17 Change the mapped land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately- owned parcel located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family Residential". Discussion This city-initiated request is to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family". Parcel No. 1921059271 owned by Mayfield TNC LLC is located east of end of B ST SE between 15th and 16th ST SE. According to KC Assessor records, CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 33 of 34 the property is developed with two, 2-story buildings as the "Mayfield Apartments" containing 31 dwelling units. The change would remedy an inadvertent change of mapped land use designation as part of 2015 plan adoption and revert to the former designation. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment CPM #17 to change the land use designation of an approximately 0.71- acre privately-owned and developed parcel from "Residential Transition" to "Multiple Family" (Parcel No. 1921059271). CPA17-0001, 2017 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Group #2 – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments Date: October 19, 2017 Page 34 of 34 EXHIBIT LIST: Exhibit 1. Staff Report Group #2 Amendments - CPA17-0001 and REZ17-0002, REZ17-0003 & REZ17- 0004 Exhibit 2. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Maps (Thumbnails of maps are provided in the staff report and full size maps are available in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 3. Rezone Maps (Full size maps are in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 4. WA State Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter dated September 26, 2017 (in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 5. Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance (in the ‘working binder’) Exhibit 6. Notice of Public Hearing (Attached) -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6667 December 13, 2017 Page 12 Exhibit "D" The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan Excerpt of “Volume 1 - Land Use Element” of the City Comprehensive Plan (Pages LU-4 through LU-7) with strike through and underlines to show changes (Four of the nine text amendments are contained within this excerpt). P/T #6 - Remove the discussion of a "Mixed Use" land use designation from the text of the Plan and from the Land Use Map. The R10, R16, and R20 residential zoning districts already allow for mixed uses (comprised of residential & commercial) as permitted uses (See Table 18.07.020, Permitted Use Table ). P/T #7 - Add text to add back the R5, Residential zoning district back in as an implementing zone for the "Single Family" Land Use Designation. The 2015 Comp Plan this zone was inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning district of any Comp. Plan land use designation and must be corrected. P/T #8 - Change the title of the land use designation of "Residential Transition" to "Moderate Density Residential". Requested to revert to pre-2015 title of the category. Provide a distinct and logical title for the category to address and reflect the range of residential densities. P/T #9 - Add the "R-10, Residential" and R-16, Residential" zoning districts back as implementing zones for the "Residential Transition" or if recommended, to the "Moderate Density Residential" Land Use Designation. In the 2015, Comp Plan these zoning districts were inadvertently omitted as an implementing zoning districts of any Comp. Plan land use designation. (See “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab - Attachment 5 ) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 26, 2017 Attachment 5 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: Ray Vefik Robyn Mulenga Anne Baunach (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Ryan Van Quill Laurie Bishop Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service…………………… Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..… Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Table of Contents Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section I Executive Summary 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2017. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 24 students and 17.3 students for our nine schools designated as serving high poverty areas; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 26 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 29 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 23.35 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 3 2016-17 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 15,945 as of October 1, 2016. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, is scheduled to start construction in March 2018. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2017 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 18.23 to 17.3 students at 9 elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas in 2016-17. Maximum K-2 class sizes remains at 24 students at the remaining 5 elementary schools. B. Maximum third and fourth grade class size remains at 26 students. C. Maximum 5th grade class size remains at 29 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 1 portable at Evergreen Heights Elementary School. B. Add 1 portable at Gildo Rey Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Lakeland Hills Elementary School. D. Add 1 portable at Auburn Mountainview High School. Section V Pupil Capacity The four portables to be placed in August 2017 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 4 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2016 to 2017 CPF CPF 2016 2017 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2260 0.1930 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0820 0.0770 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0940 0.0730 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0720 0.1030 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0220 0.0310 Sr. High 0.0440 0.0440 School Construction Costs Elementary $48,500,000 $48,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $413,463 $434,136 Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $213.23 $213.23 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2016) Match % - State 63.83% 63.29% Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017) Match % - District 36.89% 36.71% Computed District Average AV Single Family $269,764 $292,035 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $113,408 $127,147 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $1.59 $2.65 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.27% 3.95% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2016 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2017 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2017 DATA ELEMENTS From replacement school cost estimate in May 2016. 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2017) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1237 1281 1331 1383 1430 1474 1516 1 1210 1292 1342 1395 1441 1485 1528 2 1300 1242 1331 1383 1430 1473 1516 3 1317 1321 1270 1359 1406 1450 1492 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1430 1472 5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1451 K - 5 7500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 6 - 8 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 10 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1471 11 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 12 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 9 - 12 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 TOTALS 15,945 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,485 19,007 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 7500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 6-8 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9-12 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 K-12 15,945 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,485 19,007 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,500 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,392 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,053 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 23.35 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 23.35 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eleven classrooms to provide for 107 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 9 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 23.35 each = (163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (163) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.358 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 23.35 each = (234) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (234) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 23.35 each = (93) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (93) 10 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 23.35 each = (187) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (187) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides an Early Childhood Education Assistance Program to meet local needs for disadvantaged students. The State has funded an increase of 24 ECEAP seats. This program will require two new classrooms for 2015-16. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) 11 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 12 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 13 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 11 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) 14 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,845) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,845) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (630) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,360) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,360) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (3,835) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,835) 15 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 17 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,100 20.50 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2017) Elementary Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Washington 5566666 Terminal Park 6778880 Dick Scobee 7700000 Pioneer 7770000 Chinook 6777000 Lea Hill 5566600 Gildo Rey 7788888 Evergreen Heights 5566666 Alpac 6677777 Lake View 2223333 Hazelwood 2344444 Ilalko 6677777 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7778888 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4566666 TOTAL UNITS 75 79 80 76 69 63 55 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,860 1,959 1,984 1,885 1,711 1,562 1,364 Middle School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Cascade 0011222 Olympic 0011222 Rainier 5678999 Mt. Baker 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 16 20 21 24 24 24 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 480 600 630 720 720 720 Sr. High School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 West Auburn 0011111 Auburn High School 0001111 Auburn High School - *TAP 1111111 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 4455566 TOTAL UNITS 18 18 20 21 21 22 22 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 540 600 630 630 660 660 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 107 113 120 118 114 109 101 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,820 2,979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 19 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,015) (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) C. Net Capacity 14,717 14,876 15,081 15,692 16,258 16,139 15,941 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,465 19,007 19,525 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,701) (1,969) (2,342) (2,258) (2,207) (2,868)(3,584) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,820 2,979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) Total Adjustments (1,015) (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) Table V.2 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) C. Net Capacity 11,897 11,897 11,897 12,547 13,197 13,197 13,197 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,465 19,007 19,525 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,521) (4,948) (5,526) (5,403) (5,268) (5,810)(6,328) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) Total Adjustments (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 24.38% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 22.52% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 21 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PUPIL CAPACITY A. Elementary Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 B. Middle Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 C. Senior High Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) 22 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 24 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 25 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015/16 school year. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 26 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School is scheduled to begin in March 2018. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,062 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects include improvements at the Support Services Center, Transportation Center, replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement at Auburn Mountainview High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn Riverside High School. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2017-23 Capital Construction Plan (May 2017) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 All Facilities - Technology 2013 Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy 1/ Portables Yes $2,500,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 3 New Elementaries Yes $14,900,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Cap. Levy Impact Fee XX XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX plan XX plan XX const XX const XX const XX const XX const 1/ Replacement of one Middle School Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX plan XX const XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2017)Elementary #15 within 3 year periodElementary #16 within 4 year periodI. SITE COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student FactorSite Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) 12 $434,136 650 0.1930 0.1030 $1,546.86 $825.53Middle Sch (6 - 8) 25 $0 800 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) 40 $0 1500 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$1,546.86 $825.53II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage)Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $48,500,000 650 0.9451 0.1930 0.1030 $13,609.76 $7,263.24Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0 800 0.9451 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 0.9451 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$13,609.76 $7,263.24III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio)Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $170,000 23.35 0.0549 0.1930 0.1030 $77.18 $41.19Mid Sch (6 - 8) $170,000 30 0.0549 0.0770 0.0310 $23.97 $9.65Sr High (9 - 12) $170,000 30 0.0549 0.0730 0.0440 $22.72 $13.70 $123.86 $64.53IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor)Boeckh SPI State Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $213.23 90 63.29% 0.1930 0.1030 $2,344.14 $1,251.02Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0.00 108 63.29% 0.0770 0.0310 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0.00 130 63.29% 0.0730 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00 $2,344.14 $1,251.03Student Generation Factor28 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: Expressed as the present value of an annuityTC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi FamilySingle Family $292,035 $2.65 3.95% 10$6,292.62Multi Family $127,147 $2.65 3.95% 10$2,739.70VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDITFormula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility CreditSingle Family $0.00 1$0.00Multi Family $0.00 1$0.00 FEEPER UNIT IMPACT FEESRECAP Single MultiSUMMARY Family FamilySite Costs $1,546.86 $825.53Permanent Facility Const Costs $13,609.76 $7,263.24Temporary Facility Costs $123.86 $64.53State Match Credit ($2,344.14) ($1,251.03)Tax Credit ($6,292.62) ($2,739.70)FEE (No Discount) $6,643.73 $4,162.58FEE (50% Discount) $3,321.86 $2,081.29Less ASD Discount Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00Net Fee Obligation $3,321.86 $2,081.2929 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr HighK - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2017 0.193 0.077 0.073 0.103 0.031 0.044New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2017 $48,500,000 $48,500,000Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 23.35 30 30 23.3530 30Grades K - 5 @ 23.35 and 6 - 12 @ 30.Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40Site Cost/Acre See below $434,136 $434,136 $434,136 $434,136 $434,136$434,136Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317Temp Sq Footage 107 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533 98,533Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850 1,793,850% - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51% 94.51%% - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49% 5.49%SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for December 2012 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23Match % - State From SPI Webpage December 2012 63.29% 63.29% 63.29%63.29% 63.29% 63.29%Match % - District Computed 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71% 36.71%Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2015 $292,035 $292,035 $292,035 $127,147 $127,147 $127,147Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2017) 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95% 3.95%Site Cost ProjectionsRecent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date ProjectedAcquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/AcreLakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $467,940 5.00% Elementary 2017$455,843Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $336,940 5.00% Elementary 2018 $478,635Lakeland East 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 $336,747 $497,528 5.00% Elementary2022 $581,783Total 74.00$19,395,002 $262,095 $434,13630 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2016 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are:  Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next.  Factor 2 – Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period.  Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 2 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below.  Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole.  Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.  Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain.  Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison.  Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the fifth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 282 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 1.62% annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 244 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 971 to 1,300. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 688 to 692. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 692 to 774. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 2,179 to 3,047. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,289 to 1,536. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 1,569 to 1,659. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments(Rev 10/16)1ActualGRADE 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-1616-17KDG 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 12371 960 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 12102 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 13003 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 13174 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 12375 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 11996 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 11527 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 11328 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 11089 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 126110 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 124811 1055 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 131812 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226TOTALS 13,672 14,088 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,277 15,66315,945Percent of Gain 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99%(0.78)% (0.73)% (0.82)%1.62% 2.57% 2.04% 2.53% 1.80%Pupil Gain 416 330 141 144(114) (107) (119)233 375 306 386 282Average % Gain for 1st 6 years. 0.97% Average % Gain for last 6 years 1.62%Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 135 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 244Average % Gain for 13 years. 1.30%Average Pupil Gain for 13 years. 189TABLE1A Grade Group CombinationsKDG 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237K,1,2 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766 3747K - 5 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340 7500K - 6 6755 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 8456 86521 - 3 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 3800 38271 - 5 4843 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 6142 62631 - 6 5863 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 7258 74156 - 8 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 3351 33927 - 8 2254 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 2235 22407 - 9 3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 3464 35019 - 12 4663 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 4972 505310 - 12 3202 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743 3792Page 3 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE Factors Used in Projections Factor AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS2 3 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATESCAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTENFactor Average Pupil Change Between Grade ENDAR LIVE 2/3rds 1/3rds OFLIVE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A % OF1 Levels YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1976 13,761 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856%K to 1 48.83 K to 1 52.67 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 666 4.452%1 to 2 18.67 1 to 2 30.00 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 726 4.524%2 to 3 16.50 2 to 3 18.67 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 792 4.740%3 to 4 27.50 3 to 4 22.17 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 829 4.876%4 to 5 22.00 4 to 5 20.50 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 769 4.216%5 to 6 1.67 5 to 6(4.83)1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18,626 817 4.386%6 to 7 17.42 6 to 7 19.33 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 89/90 18,827 871 4.626%7 to 8 12.50 7 to 8 11.83 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 858 4.398%8 to 9 184.33 8 to 9 147.00 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 91/92 19,893 909 4.569%9 to 10 0.92 9 to 10 8.83 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 92/93 21,852 920 4.210%10 to 11(27.50)10 to 11(11.17)1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93/94 21,624 930 4.301%11 to 12 40.58 11 to 12 74.50 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 94/95 24,062 927 3.853%total 363.42 total 389.50 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 95/96 26,358 954 3.619%Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of pupils as they 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96/97 24,116 963 3.993%move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 97/98 20,973 978 4.663%the past (12) OR (5) years of changes. 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 854 3.959%1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 849 3.837%Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 912 3.798%2 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 01/02 22,717 846 3.724% 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,622 905 4.186%K 28.75 K 41.60 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 922 4.186%1 20.83 1 28.40 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041%2 25.67 2 40.60 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 05/06 22,327 955 4.277%3 33.25 3 64.20 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 06/07 22,014 941 4.274%4 18.42 4 43.00 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21,835 996 4.562%5 20.17 5 36.20 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 998 4.487%6 11.00 6 17.80 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 09/10 22,726 1032 4.541%7 0.67 7 20.00 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 1010 4.441%8(1.83)8 12.40 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11/12 23,723 1029 4.338%9(16.67)9(2.40)2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 12/13 24,683 1098 4.448%10(1.08)10 15.60 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 13/14 25,094 1162 4.631%Last 511 21.92 11 17.00 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 14/15 25,101 1232 4.908%year12 28.33 12(18.00)2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 15/16 24,695 1198 4.851%AverageFactor 2 is the average change in grade level size 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 16/17 24,5911237 Actual5.030%4.774%from 01/02 OR 08/09. 2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 17/18 24,8981189<--Prjctd year2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 18/19 24,9511191<--Prjctd year2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 19/20 25,2021203<--Prjctd year2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 20/21 25,4411214<--Prjctd2015 25,487 16,991 8,496 21/22 * number from DOHSource: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of HealthPage 4 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016Contact Todd Rime - todd.rime@doh.wa.gov 360-236-4323TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 16111 1210 1286 1315 1343 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 1573 1602 16312 1300 1229 1305 1333 1362 1391 1420 1448 1477 1506 1535 1563 1592 16213 1317 1317 1245 1321 1350 1379 1407 1436 1465 1494 1522 1551 1580 16094 1237 1345 1344 1273 1349 1377 1406 1435 1464 1492 1521 1550 1579 16075 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1399 1428 1457 1486 1514 1543 1572 16016 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 15737 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1418 1447 1476 1505 1533 15628 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1431 1460 1488 1517 15469 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1615 1644 1673 170110 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1616 1645 167411 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1589 161712 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1629TOTALS 15,945 16,348 16,648 17,073 17,514 17,951 18,381 18,803 19,204 19,575 19,866 20,187 20,608 20,981Percent of Gain 2.53% 1.83% 2.56% 2.58% 2.50% 2.40% 2.29% 2.14% 1.93% 1.49% 1.61% 2.08% 1.81%Pupil Gain 403 299 426 440 438 430 421 402 370 292 321 421 374TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 17781 1210 1290 1331 1373 1414 1456 1498 1539 1581 1622 1664 1706 1747 17892 1300 1240 1320 1361 1403 1444 1486 1528 1569 1611 1652 1694 1736 17773 1317 1319 1259 1338 1380 1422 1463 1505 1546 1588 1630 1671 1713 17544 1237 1339 1341 1281 1361 1402 1444 1485 1527 1569 1610 1652 1693 17355 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1423 1464 1506 1547 1589 1631 1672 17146 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1418 1459 1501 1543 1584 1626 16677 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1437 1479 1520 1562 1604 16458 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1449 1491 1532 1574 16159 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1596 1638 1679 172110 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1605 1646 168811 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1594 163512 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1668TOTALS 15,945 16,387 16,704 17,144 17,604 18,111 18,624 19,140 19,655 20,153 20,590 21,067 21,646 22,187Percent of Gain 2.77% 1.94% 2.63% 2.68% 2.88% 2.83% 2.77% 2.69% 2.53% 2.17% 2.32% 2.75% 2.50%Pupil Gain 442 317 440 460 507 513 515 515 498 437 477 579 541Page 5 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30K 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214 1 1210 1286 1237 1240 1252 1263 2 1300 1229 1305 1256 1259 1271 1282 3 1317 1317 1245 1321 1273 1275 1287 12984 1237 1345 1344 1273 1349 1300 1303 1315 13265 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1322 1325 1337 13486 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1324 1326 1338 13507 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1341 1344 1356 13678 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1354 1356 1368 13809 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1538 1540 1552 156410 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1539 1541 155311 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1511 151412 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1552TOTALS 15,945 16,271 16,467 16,772 17,075Percent of Gain 2.04% 1.20% 1.85% 1.81%Pupil Gain 326 196 305 303TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214 1 1210 1290 1241 1244 1256 12672 1300 1240 1320 1271 1274 1286 12973 1317 1319 1259 1338 1290 1292 1304 13164 1237 1339 1341 1281 1361 1312 1315 1327 13385 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1333 1335 1347 13586 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1328 1330 1342 13547 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1347 1350 1362 13738 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1359 1361 1373 13859 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1506 1508 1520 153210 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1515 1517 152911 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1504 150612 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1578TOTALS 15,945 16,297 16,485 16,766 17,037Percent of Gain 2.21% 1.15% 1.71% 1.62%Pupil Gain 352 188 281 271Page 6 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13 Based on 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 16111 1210 1286 1315 1343 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 1573 1602 16312 1300 1229 1305 1333 1362 1391 1420 1448 1477 1506 1535 1563 1592 16213131713171245132113501379140714361465149415221551158016094123713451344127313491377140614351464149215211550157916075 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1399 1428 1457 1486 1514 1543 1572 1601 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7700 7869 7960 8079 8299 8471 8644 8816 8989 9161 9334 9506 9679 971 2179Percent of Gain 2.67% 2.19% 1.15% 1.50% 2.72% 2.08% 2.04% 2.00% 1.96% 1.92% 1.88% 1.85% 1.81%Pupil Gain 200 169 90 120 220 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 17781 1210 1290 1331 1373 1414 1456 1498 1539 1581 1622 1664 1706 1747 17892 1300 1240 1320 1361 1403 1444 1486 1528 1569 1611 1652 1694 1736 17773 1317 1319 1259 1338 1380 1422 1463 1505 1546 1588 1630 1671 1713 17544123713391341128113611402144414851527156916101652169317355 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1423 1464 1506 1547 1589 1631 1672 1714 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7724 7930 8076 8263 8550 8800 9049 9299 9549 9798 10048 1029710547 1300 3047Percent of Gain 2.98% 2.68% 1.84% 2.30% 3.48% 2.92% 2.84% 2.76% 2.68% 2.61% 2.55% 2.48% 2.42%Pupil Gain 224 207 146 186 288 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30K 1237 1189 1191 1203 12141 1210 1286 1237 1240 1252 12632 1300 1229 1305 1256 1259 1271 12823 1317 1317 1245 1321 1273 1275 1287 129841237134513441273134913001303131513265 1199 1259 1367 1366 1295 1371 1322 1325 1337 1348 4 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7623 7689 7659 7641141Percent of Gain 1.64% 0.86%(0.39)% (0.24)%Pupil Gain 123 66(30) (18)TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30KDG 1237 1189 1191 1203 12141 1210 1290 1241 1244 1256 12672 1300 1240 1320 1271 1274 1286 12973 1317 1319 1259 1338 1290 1292 1304 131641237133913411281136113121315132713385 1199 1258 1360 1361 1301 1381 1333 1335 1347 1358 4 yearK - 5 TOT 7500 7634 7711 7699 7696196Percent of Gain 1.78% 1.02%(0.16)% (0.04)%Pupil Gain 134 78(13) (3)Page 7 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1401 1430 1458 1487 1516 1545 15737 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1418 1447 1476 1505 1533 15628 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1431 1460 1488 1517 1546 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4117 4250 4336 4423 4509 4595 4681 692 1289Percent of Gain 3.61% 4.16% 5.91% 4.31% 0.88% 0.10% 0.81% 3.24% 2.03% 1.99% 1.95% 1.91% 1.88%Pupil Gain 123 146 216 167 36 4 33 133 86 86 86 86 86TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1418 1459 1501 1543 1584 1626 16677 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1437 1479 1520 1562 1604 16458 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1449 1491 1532 1574 1615 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4141 4304 4429 4553 4678 4803 4928 688 1536Percent of Gain 3.46% 3.99% 5.56% 4.21% 1.09% .53% 1.50% 3.93% 2.90% 2.82% 2.74% 2.67% 2.60%Pupil Gain 117 140 203 162 44 21 61 163 125 125 125 125 125TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1201 1261 1368 1368 1296 1372 1324 1326 1338 13507 1132 1169 1218 1278 1386 1385 1314 1390 1341 1344 1356 13678 1108 1145 1182 1231 1291 1398 1398 1326 1402 1354 1356 1368 1380 6 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4040 4069 4036 4061 692 669Percent of Gain 3.61% 4.16% 5.91% 4.31% 0.88% 0.10%(1.08)%0.74%(0.83)%0.64%Pupil Gain 123 146 216 167 36 4(44)30(34)26TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-306 1152 1194 1253 1355 1357 1297 1376 1328 1330 1342 13547 1132 1171 1214 1272 1374 1376 1316 1396 1347 1350 1362 13738 1108 1144 1183 1225 1284 1386 1388 1328 1407 1359 1361 1373 1385 6 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4051 4085 4051 4077 688 685Percent of Gain 3.46% 3.99% 5.56% 4.21% 1.09% 0.53%(0.71)%0.83%(0.83)%0.64%Pupil Gain 117 140 203 162 44 21(29)34(34)26Page 8 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1615 1644 1673 170110 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1616 1645 167411 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1589 161712 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1629 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6282 6344 6507 6622 774 1569Percent of Gain 1.59%(0.31)%2.33% 2.94% 3.39% 4.55% 3.70% 1.58% 1.82% 0.52% 0.99% 2.55% 1.77%Pupil Gain 80(16)119 154 183 254 216 96 112 33 62 162 115TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1596 1638 1679 172110 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1605 1646 168811 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1594 163512 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1668 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6238 6341 6546 6712 692 1659Percent of Gain 2.00%(0.57)%1.78% 2.13% 3.30% 4.40% 3.56% 1.72% 2.04% 1.02% 1.65% 3.22% 2.54%Pupil Gain 101(30)91 111 176 242 205 102 124 63 103 204 166TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1292 1329 1366 1415 1475 1582 1582 1511 1586 1538 1540 1552 156410 1248 1262 1293 1330 1367 1416 1476 1583 1583 1512 1587 1539 1541 155311 1318 1221 1234 1266 1302 1340 1388 1448 1556 1555 1484 1560 1511 151412 1226 1359 1261 1275 1306 1343 1380 1429 1489 1596 1596 1525 1600 1552 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6205 6164 6206 6183 774 1130Percent of Gain 1.59%(0.31)%2.33% 2.94% 3.39% 4.55% 3.70% 1.58% 1.82%(0.71)% (0.67)%0.68%(0.36)%Pupil Gain 80(16)119 154 183 254 216 96 112(44) (41)42(23)TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-309 1261 1255 1291 1330 1372 1431 1533 1535 1475 1554 1506 1508 1520 153210 1248 1270 1264 1300 1339 1381 1440 1542 1544 1484 1563 1515 1517 152911 1318 1237 1259 1253 1289 1328 1370 1429 1531 1532 1472 1552 1504 150612 1226 1393 1311 1333 1327 1363 1402 1445 1503 1605 1607 1547 1627 1578 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6148 6122 6168 6145 692 1092Percent of Gain 2.00%(0.57)%1.78% 2.13% 3.30% 4.40% 3.56% 1.72% 2.04%(0.44)% (0.43)%0.75%(0.37)%Pupil Gain 101(30)91 111 176 242 205 102 124(27) (26)46(23)Page 9 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS4 BY GRADE GROUPKINDERGARTENACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearE.13 1237 1266 1295 1323 1352 1381 1410 1438 1467 1496 1525 1553 1582 1611 173374E.6 1237 1279 1320 1362 1403 1445 1487 1528 1570 1611 1653 1695 1736 1778 250 541E.13A 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214E.6A 1237 1189 1191 1203 1214GRD 1 -- GRD 5ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearE.13 6263 6435 6575 6636 6727 6918 7062 7205 7349 7493 7637 7780 7924 8068 7991805E.6 6263 6445 6610 6715 6859 7105 7313 7521 7729 7937 8145 8353 8561 8769 10502506E.13A 6263 6435 6498 6456 6426E.6A 6263 6445 6520 6495 6481GRD 6 -- GRD 8ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearMS.13 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4117 4250 4336 4423 4509 4595 4681 692 1289MS.6 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4141 4304 4429 4553 4678 4803 4928 6881536MS.13A 3392 3515 3661 3877 4044 4080 4084 4040 4069 4036 4061 692MS.6A 3392 3509 3649 3852 4015 4058 4080 4051 4085 4051 4077 688GRD 9 -- GRD 12ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 yearSH.13 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6282 6344 6507 6622 774 1569SH.6 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6238 6341 6546 6712 6921659SH.13A 5053 5133 5118 5237 5391 5573 5827 6043 6138 6250 6205 6164 6206 6183 774 1130SH.6A 5053 5154 5125 5216 5327 5503 5745 5950 6052 6175 6148 6122 6168 6145 692 1092DISTRICT TOTALSACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 6 year 13 year3.13 15,945 16,348 16,648 17,073 17,514 17,951 18,381 18,803 19,204 19,575 19,866 20,187 20,608 20,981 2436 50363.6 15,945 16,387 16,704 17,144 17,604 18,111 18,624 19,140 19,655 20,15320,590 21,067 21,646 22,187 2679 62423.13A 15,945 16,271 16,467 16,772 17,0753.6A 15,945 16,297 16,485 16,766 17,037Page 10 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6142 xxx xxx 6198 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5723(12) (0.21)%5655(232) (3.94)%5761(272) (4.51)%5750(392) (6.38)%5871(327) (5.28)%Prj 3E.6 5735 0 0.00% 5662(225) (3.82)%5821(212) (3.51)%5795(347) (5.65)%5921(277) (4.47)%Prj 3E.13A 5743 8 0.14% 5605(282) (4.79)%5709(324) (5.37)%5750(392) (6.38)%5869(329) (5.31)%Prj 3E.6A 5776 41 0.71% 5631(256) (4.35)%5756(277) (4.59)%5784(358) (5.83)%5912(286) (4.61)%Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3274 xxx xxx 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3025(249) (7.61)%3185 16 0.50% 3214 70 2.23% 3295 198 6.39% 3131(75) (2.34)%Prj 3E.6 3011(263) (8.03)%3192 23 0.73% 3216 72 2.29% 3311 214 6.91% 3146(60) (1.87)%Prj 3E.13A 3025(249) (7.61)%3185 16 0.50% 3214 70 2.23% 3295 198 6.39% 3131(75) (2.34)%Prj 3E.6A 3011(263) (8.03)%3192 23 0.73% 3216 72 2.29% 3311 214 6.91% 3146(60) (1.87)%Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 4663 xxx xxx 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4455(208) (4.46)%4577(455) (9.04)%4630(611) (11.66)%4783(537) (10.09)%5085(214) (4.04)%Prj 3E.6 4476(187) (4.01)%4594(438) (8.70)%4639(602) (11.49)%4769(551) (10.36)%5086(213) (4.02)%Prj 3E.13A 4455(208) (4.46)%4577(455) (9.04)%4630(611) (11.66)%4783(537) (10.09)%5085(214) (4.04)%Prj 3E.6A 4476(187) (4.01)%4594(438) (8.70)%4639(602) (11.49)%4769(551) (10.36)%5086(213) (4.02)%All 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 13,672 xxx xxx 14,088 xxx xxx 14,418 xxx xxx 14,559 xxx xxx 14,703 xxxxxxPrj 3E.13 13,203(469) (3.43)%13,417(671) (4.76)%13,605(813) (5.64)%13,828(731) (5.02)%14,087(616) (4.19)%Prj 3E.6 13,222(450) (3.29)%13,448(640) (4.54)%13,676(742) (5.15)%13,875(684) (4.70)%14,153(550) (3.74)%Prj 3E.13A 13,223(449) (3.28)%13,367(721) (5.12)%13,553(865) (6.00)%13,828(731) (5.02)%14,085(618) (4.20)%Prj 3E.6A 13,263(409) (2.99)%13,417(671) (4.76)%13,611(807) (5.60)%13,864(695) (4.77)%14,144(559) (3.80)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUPPage 11 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 6159 xxx xxx 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxx 6805 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 6085(74) (1.20)%6179(29) (0.47)%6254 24 0.39% 6282(207) (3.19)%6275(530) (7.79)%Prj 3E.6 6138(21) (0.34)%6237 29 0.47% 6294 64 1.03% 6323(166) (2.56)%6267(538) (7.91)%Prj 3E.13A 6059(100) (1.62)%6129(79) (1.27)%6237 7 0.11% 6252(237) (3.65)%6266(539) (7.92)%Prj 3E.6A 6094(65) (1.06)%6172(36) (0.58)%6264 34 0.55% 6269(220) (3.39)%6260(545) (8.01)%Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3196 xxx xxx 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3264 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3107(89) (2.78)%3179(34) (1.06)%3242 101 3.22% 3234 90 2.86% 3221(43) (1.32)%Prj 3E.6 3116(80) (2.50)%3195(18) (0.56)%3243 102 3.25% 3236 92 2.93% 3211(53) (1.62)%Prj 3E.13A 3107(89) (2.78)%3179(34) (1.06)%3242 101 3.22% 3234 90 2.86% 3221(43) (1.32)%Prj 3E.6A 3116(80) (2.50)%3195(18) (0.56)%3243 102 3.25% 3236 92 2.93% 3211(53) (1.62)%Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5234 xxx xxx 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxx 4902 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5190(44) (0.84)%5129 68 1.34% 5074 82 1.64% 4921(42) (0.85)%4901(1) (0.02)%Prj 3E.6 5192(42) (0.80)%5155 94 1.86% 5128 136 2.72% 5027 64 1.29% 5017 115 2.35%Prj 3E.13A 5190(44) (0.84)%5129 68 1.34% 5074 82 1.64% 4921(42) (0.85)%4901(1) (0.02)%Prj 3E.6A 5192(42) (0.80)%5155 94 1.86% 5129 137 2.74% 5027 64 1.29% 5017 115 2.35%All 2009-10 2010-11 2003-04 2012-13 2013-14Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 14,589 xxx xxx 14,482 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,596 xxx xxx 14,971 xxxxxxPrj 3E.13 14,382(207) (1.42)%13,499(173) (6.79)%14,570 898 6.57% 14,437(159) (1.09)%14,397(574)(3.83)%Prj 3E.6 14,446(143) (0.98)%13,542(130) (6.49)%14,665 993 7.26% 14,586(10)(0.07)% 14,495(476)(3.18)%Prj 3E.13A 14,356(233) (1.60)%13,447(225) (7.15)%14,553 881 6.44% 14,407(189) (1.29)%14,388(583)(3.89)%Prj 3E.6A 14,402(187) (1.28)%13,510(162) (6.71)%14,636 964 7.05% 14,532(64)(0.44)% 14,488(483)(3.23)%BY GRADE GROUP (Continued)PROJECTION COMPARISONSPage 12 October 2016 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2016TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average Historical Data is grouped byK - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulationACTUAL 7061 xxx xxx 7340 xxxxxx7500 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern.Prj 3E.13 6372(689) (9.76)%6659(681) (9.28)%7052(448) (5.97)% (245) (4.43)%Prj 3E.6 6368(693) (9.81)%6632(708) (9.65)%7046(454) (6.05)% (220) (4.02)%Articulation pattern has noPrj 3E.13A 6346(715) (10.13)%6643(697) (9.50)%6979(521) (6.95)% (268) (4.82)%numeric impact on efficacyPrj 3E.6A 6339(722) (10.23)%6611(729) (9.93)%6966(534) (7.12)% (249) (4.49)%of projection models.Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 3238 xxx xxx 3351 xxx xxx 3392 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3143(95) (2.93)%3230(121) (3.61)%3256(136)(4.01)%(21) (0.80)%Prj 3E.6 3132(106) (3.27)%3213(138) (4.12)%3246(146)(4.30)%(20) (0.78)%Prj 3E.13A 3143(95) (2.93)%3230(121) (3.61)%3256(136)(4.01)%(21) (0.80)%Prj 3E.6A 3132(106) (3.27)%3213(138) (4.12)%3246(146)(4.30)%(20) (0.78)%Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 4978 xxx xxx 4972 xxx xxx 5053 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4813(165) (3.31)%4773(199) (4.00)%4874(179) (3.54)% (180) (3.76)%Prj 3E.6 4906(72) (1.45)%4856(116) (2.33)%4956(97) (1.92)% (141) (2.84)%Prj 3E.13A 4813(165) (3.31)%4773(199) (4.00)%4874(179) (3.54)% (180) (3.76)%Prj 3E.6A 4906(72) (1.45)%4856(116) (2.33)%4956(97) (1.92)% (141) (2.83)%All 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Average AverageGrades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 15,277 xxx xxx 15,663 xxx xxx 15,945 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 14,328(949) (6.21)%14,662(1,001) (6.39)%15,182(763) (4.79)% (479) (3.61)%Prj 3E.6 14,406(871) (5.70)%14,701(962) (6.14)%15,248(697) (4.37)% (412) (3.16)%Prj 3E.13A 14,302(975) (6.38)%14,646(1,017) (6.49)%15,109(836) (5.24)% (505) (3.79)%Prj 3E.6A 14,377(900) (5.89)%14,680(983) (6.28)%15,168(777) (4.87)% (441) (3.35)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUP (Continued)Page 13 October 2016 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULEStudent Generation FactorsASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi-1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2017 SF 2017 MFFamily Family2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2017 as allowed per King County OrdinanceElementary 0.1930 0.10303 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2017-2023Middle School 0.0770 0.03104 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2017-2023Senior High 0.0730 0.04405 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developmentsTotal 0.3430 0.1780Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 TotalLakeland/Kersey Single Family 0 100 150 75 50 29 404Lea Hill Area Single Family 50 75 50 30 0 0 0 205Other Single Family Units 40 60 50 20 0 0 0 170Total Single Family Units 90 235 250 125 50 29 0 779Projected Pupils:K-5 17 45 48 24 10 6 0 1506-8 7 18 19 10 4 2 0 609-12 7 17 18942057K-12 31 81 86 43 17 10 0267Multi Family Units 0 150 300 150 48 0 0 648Total Multi Family Units 0 150 300 150 48 0 0 648Projected Pupils:K-5 0 15 31 15 5 0 0 676-80595100209-12 0 7 13720029K-12 0 27 53 27 9 0 0115Total Housing Units 90 385 550 275 98 29 0 1427K-5 17 61 79 40 15 6 0 2176-8 7 23 29 14 5 2 0 809-12 7 24 31 16 6 2 0 85K-12 31 107 139 70 26 10 0383Cumulative Projection2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2417 78 157 197 211 217 2177 3058737880807 30627883858531 138 277 347 373 383 383Auburn FactorsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsTotalMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsTotalTotalSr. High PupilsElementary - Grades K -5Mid School - Grades 6 - 8Senior High - Grades 9 - 12Total46 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of averageGRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25Enroll. & LevelKDG 11617.67%1237 2 11 21 27 29 29 291 11767.77%1210 2 11 22 27 29 30 302 11827.81% 45.61%1300 2 11 22 27 29 30 303 11537.62%1317 2 11 21 26 28 29 294 11247.43%1237 2 10 21 26 28 28 285 11097.33%1199 2 10 20 25 27 28 286 10857.17%1152 2 10 20 25 27 27 277 10857.17% 21.51%1132 2 10 20 25 27 27 278 10857.17%1108 2 10 20 25 27 27 279 12338.15%1261 3 11 23 28 30 31 3110 12358.16% 32.88%1248 3 11 23 28 30 31 3111 12228.07%1318 2 11 22 28 30 31 3112 12878.50%1226 3 12 24 29 32 33 33Totals 15136100.00% Total 15945 31 138 277 347 373 383 383TABLE 6 year Historical Data3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade LevelGrade11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-176yr Ave %KDG 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1160.67 7.67%1 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1175.50 7.77%2 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1181.50 7.81%3 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1152.83 7.62%4 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1124.33 7.43%5 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1109.33 7.33%6 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1084.50 7.17%7 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1085.33 7.17%8 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1085.17 7.17%9 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1232.83 8.15%10 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1235.00 8.16%11 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1222.17 8.07%12 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1286.67 8.50%Totals 14363 14596 14971 15277 15663 15945 15135.83 100.00%% of change 1.62% 2.57% 2.04% 2.53% 1.80%change +/- 233 375 306 386 28247 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1268 1306 1344 1379 1410 1439 1467enrollees move to the next1 1210 1288 1326 1365 1399 1430 1460 1488grade level.2 1300 1231 1316 1355 1389 1420 1450 14783 1317 1319 1256 1342 1376 1407 1436 1465Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1347 1354 1294 1375 1405 1434 1463previous years number plus5 1199 1261 1377 1386 1320 1398 1427 1456K-5 7500 7716 7934 8086 8238 8470 8646 8817Current generation based on 6 1152 1203 1271 1388 1393 1323 1399 1428% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1171 1228 1298 1411 1412 1341 1417factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1147 1192 1251 1316 1425 1425 1353survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3392 3522 3691 3937 4120 4159 4166 4199history.9 1261 1295 1340 1389 1443 1505 1613 161310 1248 1265 1304 1353 1395 1446 1507 161411 1318 2 11 22 28 30 31 3112 1226 1224 1246 1290 1331 1372 1421 1481GR 9-12 5053 3785 3901 4053 4198 4354 4572 4739Total 15945 15023 15526 16075 16556 16983 17385 17756% of change -5.78% 3.35% 3.54% 2.99% 2.58% 2.37% 2.13%change +/- -922 503 549 481 427 402 371TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2022-23 2023-24model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1281 1331 1383 1430 1474 1516 1557 1575 1593enrollees move to the next1 1210 1292 1342 1395 1441 1485 1528 1569 1587 1605grade level.2 1300 1242 1331 1383 1430 1473 1516 1558 1576 15933 1317 1321 1270 1359 1406 1450 1492 1534 1552 1569Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1430 1472 1513 1531 1548previous years number plus5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1451 1492 1509 1526K-5 7500 7739 7994 8203 8420 8720 8975 9223 9328 9434Current generation based on 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 1445 1462 1478% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 1423 1440 1456factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 1355 1371 1386survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3392 3516 3680 3912 4090 4139 4162 4224 4272 4321history.9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 1566 1584 160210 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1471 1573 1591 160911 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 1460 1476 149312 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 1478 1494 1511GR 9-12 5053 5165 5170 5307 5441 5626 5871 6077 6146 6216Total 15945 16420 16844 17421 17951 18485 19009 19525 19746 19970% of change 2.98% 2.58% 3.43% 3.04% 2.97% 2.83% 2.71% 1.14% 1.14%change +/- 475 424 577 530 534 524 516 222 22448 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2017TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 2.94% 1.14%ND3.13Aby Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1191 1202 1224 1241enrollees move to the next1 1210 1288 1248 1262 1279 1292grade level.2 1300 1231 1316 1278 1286 1300 13123 1317 1319 1256 1342 1299 1303 1316 1327Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1347 1354 1294 1375 1328 1331 1343birth rate average plus5 1199 1261 1377 1386 1320 1398 1350 13537500 7639 7752 7786 7800 6621 5309 4024Current generation based on 6 1152 1203 1271 1388 1393 1323 1399 1351% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1171 1228 1298 1411 1412 1341 1417factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1147 1192 1251 1316 1425 1425 1353survival, based on 6 year3392 3522 3691 3937 4120 4159 4166 4122history.9 1261 1295 1340 1389 1443 1505 1613 161310 1248 1265 1304 1353 1395 1446 1507 161411 1318 1223 1245 1288 1330 1370 1419 147912 1226 1362 1273 1299 1335 1375 1413 14625053 5144 5162 5328 5504 5697 5952 6168Total 15945 16305 16605 17050 17424% of change 2.26% 1.84% 2.68% 2.19%change +/- 360 300 445 374TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6Aby Grade Level Updated April 2017Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1237 1191 1202 1224 1241enrollees move to the next1 1210 1292 1252 1266 1283 1296grade level.2 1300 1242 1331 1293 1301 1315 13273 1317 1321 1270 1359 1316 1320 1333 1345Kindergarten calculates 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1340 1343 1355birth rate average plus5 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1361 13637500 7649 7775 7825 7854Current generation based on 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 1355% of total enrollment. Other7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 1423factor uses 100% cohort 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 1355survival, based on 6 year3392 3516 3680 3912 4090 4139 4162 4134history.9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 156610 1248 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1171 157311 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 146012 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 14785053 5165 5170 5307 5441 5626 5571 6077Total 15945 16330 16625 17043 17385% of change 2.41% 1.81% 2.52% 2.00%change +/- 385 295 418 34249 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 2017SINGLE FAMILYUnits/CurrentTo BeDevelopment Name ParcelsOccupancyOccupiedElemMiddleHSTotalElemMiddleHSTotalAlicia Glenn 24 24 0 6 7 2 15 0.250 0.292 0.083 0.625Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)13 9 4 11020.111 0.111 0.000 0.222Bridges 386 279 107 46 23 20 89 0.165 0.082 0.072 0.319Canyon Creek 154 51 103 9 1 6 16 0.176 0.020 0.118 0.314Kendall Ridge 106 106 0 19 11 10 40 0.179 0.104 0.094 0.377Lakeland East: Portola 130 130 0 42 18 22 82 0.323 0.138 0.169 0.631Lakeland: Edgeview 373 373 0 55 12 13 80 0.147 0.032 0.035 0.214Lakeland Hills Estates 66 66 043180.061 0.045 0.015 0.121Lakeland: Villas At … 81 81 0 17 2 3 22 0.210 0.025 0.037 0.272Monterey Park 239 239 0 43 19 16 78 0.180 0.079 0.067 0.326Mountain View 55 43 12 10 4 2 16 0.233 0.093 0.047 0.372Sonata Hills 72 72 0 8 4 3 15 0.111 0.056 0.042 0.208Sterling Court 8 8 021360.250 0.125 0.375 0.750Trail Run 169 169 0 55 17 17 89 0.325 0.101 0.101 0.527Vintage Place 25 25 0 7 6 4 17 0.280 0.240 0.160 0.680Totals 1901 1675226324 129 122575 0.193 0.077 0.073 0.343Actual Students Student Generation Factors51 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 20172017 and beyondUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS TotalAnderson Acres 14 0 14 3 1 1 5Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 1 2Bridle Estates 18 0 18 3 1 1 6Hastings 10 * 10 0 10 2 1 1 3Hazel Heights 22 0 22 4 2 2 8Hazel View 20 0 20 4 2 1 7Lakeland: Forest Glen At .. 30 0 30 6 2 2 10Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 50 20 19 88Lakeland: River Rock 14 0 14 3 1 1 5Pacific Lane 11 0 11 2 1 1 4Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 20 8 8 36Spencer Place * 13 0 13 3 1 1 4Willow Place * 18 0 18 3 1 1 6Yates Plat 16 0 16 3 1 1 5553553 Total 107 43 40 190* currently under constructionStudent Generation FactorsEstimated Students Based on52 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/12April 2017MULTI FAMILYUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS TotalLakeland: Four Lakes Apts234 234 0 15 6 11 32 0.064 0.026 0.047 0.137Legend Townhomes11 11 0 51170.455 0.091 0.091 0.636Trail Run Townhomes115 115 0 17 4 4 25 0.148 0.035 0.035 0.217360 360 0 37 11 16 64 0.103 0.031 0.044 0.1782017 and beyondPromenade Apts *(formerly Auburn Hills)320 0 320 33 10 14 57Sundallen Condos48 0 48 5129The Villas at Auburn *280 0 280 29 9 12 50648648Total67 20 29 115* currently under contructionStudent Generation Factors 53 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2023 Board Approved May 30, 2017 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320-1781h Avenue East Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 (253) 862-2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Monte St. Johns Andy Hart Hilary McCabe John McKenna Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent Dieringer Educating every child for Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow 3 Dieringer School District No. 343 Dieringer School District An Overview Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School, provide K through 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northern two-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment is approximately 1,431 students in grades kindergarten through eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Lake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Construction has begun on an addition that is expected to be completed by September 2017. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998 and 2009, North Tapps Middle School houses students in grades sixth-eighth. The district supports an additional 550 high school students who may select to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend Auburn Riverside, Sumner and Bonney Lake High Schools. The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed of students who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. Parents are concerned with student success and provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School District. The PTA and many volunteers contribute countless hours and resources to our schools and students. The community supports the schools through the passage of funding issues to support bus acquisition, student access to cmTent technology and the construction of school facilities. Impact fees, including interest, are held in reserve until used to meet District identified needs for site acquisition, additional facilities and improvements and/or technology capital expenditures. DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Current Facilities Inventory of Public Schools NAME CAPACITY LOCATION *Lake Tapps Elementary 374 1320-178'h Ave E., Lake Tapps Dieringer Heights Elementary 495 21727 -34th St. E., Lake Tapps North Tapps Middle School 536 20029-l 21h St., E., Lake Tapps High School _Q TOTAL 1,405 *Include addition to be completed by 9/2017 a ----; -= ---g ~ m ~ ____ :;_ -= ~ s e ; ; ; a s r: ------~ --:; a a :: ~ r: s :: '""' . ~1 11 1 ·1 " ,,____ l~ ,,,. C! . ,, , I ' ;~l • j O! _; ~~. '' I ~ 4 ,: ~ .~ifo/ f -,.. ; ieb?'t i ! 1 .• ,I .--a----·-· l--··· --2 -· -· -·-• ~" lb~T I I I I • , 1 IJt ~ '. ptwo ~ J l MUCl<LES(iDOT 1 fNOIAN " -• • r ••• • ••••• --~-,. •---•--•• ----• • • •••~~•-•-•• --~"'"''"·'''-•'•'••-•• ··-----• •-•-••• • --·-15 0\ "' .............. ·-.. --· ··------............. --...... -. ······-··-··--···-··-·-···. . -· .. ·-· - l\.n .. \-11111 . -··1· .. ........__ . -12='~"" 1~ u:y 1 ,.,· :· · Jti! .. n-· M • "i ·, • '"'-~-' 1;·-7--· .. ;-.,; .. ~.-.:1 ""~·;;;~ -~Jf'tf"_' \\ \ ~ ~'\-'l::.:':~!.i.;.:M\'3~m::c:r~1h!'lii»_iil'lw;r-1nrnTi£11;o;®rj\11~.;,;;/-~·i..\i'iWJ:-U\\ ,. ~Ila 1· iV:-\ ·:i.;_ ~::·., ... :·· r ' •: .-.vl1tt . ru ~ : lit"'-\~~\ 'r'~\ \\:.!tl\!.i.!'Ji:N:f.1~'.ojjj~i.ti\~t{lf.!:iiP'd.\. J11l' tiil.ttfr;'tifi'ffil.l~\IRtl.~'.il\-;'.1~.'YE.lil\JUJ:\ r 1 1 -~ ' 11 ----11~• ·~·= ~r.v;~=:·,;;.~~~-'i .1~;111"r~v' ~·--~.,.fi_ \_ .. \ .. V4f .. ~\'i-t'-..~~:\W~;1;1f~~,;~~-~\-;\'it$i\~t~~l.t\S\.{\.fiP1.\-l.~··\'1.~1-'nl'li'' -............ !'!{9" ..... I· ··(f. ·13-. --• 1140 !:·;: .. ;.:<· : .. ~ ... ".' _;; ~ ·:;~·'''i1-" -/"'" "'l~ "".!;'V' ; II '-... "~·\~:r{lf{!llilif~'l!\!lrun~Mll '\ l'r.lll.ll''~~"ii!!!~'t.~ • I a;, "" ....... :·::·. ~~·· • : • • • •• .-1 •• i;, •. 1.:. ,·. , _/ ...Ji .. ~ c.iuU.u .. ~, .. """i. ~ .. \..tJlt WZi:\\ ) i~.w.J.'iJil~_ .. ,_~v;;'M\l"'fi.'~~BJ\t\ n~!lt\1:.tgmx'r..t.'.¥.~~t~'.\!.\"':i.l\:.~'B&.'\ 1 w DIERINGERSCHOOLDISTRIOTN0.343 1·1"' ~ .. -!:..~; · • --~. ----'-'l't=--llo DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP -. . • I "'-•-' ' it~ J I ~.:!--W..T_O_rt_ •,·. 1 \ I C • ;:.\!'~. f :: •=rr&:rA .... rt r.q11mwoA .... ll' • f ) • , "'"j.J1 1.. ; I --</II !In Ulf f ...._.~~~";"'! loo'tJ:i?;~:"'I • --• ~Hei;Ms r.i-niwrSctm lbftT11?P2 lG!d• Ud'ttl Ill ~m~.:~: ~=.GJrf r ...... :_\!, ____ .,·n.t •. o\ • ..1 •• :--...r,<r..,__-~ .... -.....-.2·1.Y.~-~~1~\'c.."'~2M'1s:~;:;·~~li.~*t+'tt .... -2''3· .. --·-... ~ 1 -2<J.-· --~~11" SI ~Jm.1m !UIJ•ta= sc.1ieln1\:ltu1cmDa t 1 11 ,~vu.-w1,"!"".~ r :~~"!«~.;A"_;i,:m~-}.\~,:~wm;,.\\,-(:'~~~ ·"'"'\';~\ ~= 1 \In«" /J(6\\ _ llao "I. . ... .. .. 1 r. ' Cl)KnUlltpC',..1'""1·&'-.do t I ---I u l !I.. ...~ -.... i.... -_, --·+---...;.-+-;: .. -•'"-;<-<''"' ~uot ~ ~ ~ ; _; = ; = g: c: ~ ; ; = = ;;: ~ 5 a a e g o a Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase May2017 Proposed Housing Units: Single Family-211 x .452 generation factor= 95 students K-8 Enrollment Impact: 95 students K-8 Estimated 19 students a year over the period 2018-2023 Potential enrollment increase = 6.6% (based on 1,420 enrollment 3/17) Increase per grade level= 10.5 students (based on 9 grade bands) Approximately students per school: LTES 31.5; NTMS 31.5; DHES 31.5 District enrollment based on 3/17 and potential growth =l,515 students District program capacity= 1,405 students Enrollment Projections The Dieringer School District is located in an area that continues to experience growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data, proposed housing development, and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District continues to experience steady growth in student enrollment. This has slightly exceeded the Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed construction within the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and beyond. This growth trend was slowed in recent years by economic conditions, but has picked up again. There are 211 single family residents slated for construction within the next five years. These projects, together with individual lots and general in-migration, are anticipated to generate an additional 95 students in kindergarten through eighth grade. Information from Pierce county Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 additional housing lots in the western portion of the district. This creates a potential for 542 additional students, kindergarten through eighth grade that are not included in the above numbers. To partially address this growth, the District passed a 2006 bond issue to construct an additional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary. Those classrooms were completed and occupied in 2009. The bond issue also provided for the addition of an auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North Tapps Middle School. Those projects were completed in 2009 and the new instructional spaces are in use. This year a Growth and Facilities Task Force meet and identified the need to expand the Lake Tapps Elementary School. Construction of 3 classrooms began in the winter of2017 and will be completed by September, 2017. HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS Spring 2017 #1 Fairweather Cove Estates (19) Pierce Co/8 houses completed -Notice of application 1124/01 -27 Single Family Lots -1600-2000 block of l 61h St. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy. #2 Rainier Plateau (IO) Pierce Co/ Site work completed; home construction TBD -Notice of application 10113100 -10 Single Family Lots -End of 34•h St. #3 Grandview Ridge II and III Pierce Co/ III (I) -OffSumner-Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr. -Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1113/99 -60 Single Family Lots #4 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (10) Pierce Co -One house completed -11 large lots; Across from Snag Island #5 Country Creek Estates (1) Pierce Co/ 9 houses completed -10 Single Family Lots; off 15 111 near Edwards Road #6 Forest Canyon Estates (121) Pierce Co/ Permit expired -121 Single Family Lots; off Forest Canyon Rd. #7 The Ridge at Lake Tapps (45) Pierce County -Preliminary plat process -45 Single Family Lots -32XX Sumner Tapps Hwy. E. #8 Maryanski Plat (4) Pierce County -Preliminary plat process -4 Single Family Lots; 40 111 St. E and 230 1h Ave E 211 Single Family Units to be built Standard of Service The Dieringer School District houses children in elementary schools serving students kindergarten through fifth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. High school students, grades nine through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Auburn and Sumner School Districts. Dieringer School District follows a traditional school calendar beginning in early September and completing in mid June. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49 and 8:45 a.m. and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Dieringer School District standard of service is based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Based on the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom kindergarten through third grade 17, fourth through fifth and sixth grade 27 and seven through eighth grade 28. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes. In the District, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not counted as capacity classrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instruction, physical education and art instruction in separate, non-capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non-capacity spaces. Special education and remedial programs are provided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Dieringer School District Service Standards Public School Facilities (Square Feet Per Student) Elementary School 138 Middle School 148 Junior High NA High School NA Dieringer School District Individual Capacity Projects (2018-2023) Elementary School No. 3 450 High School NA DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Name Current Capacity Lake Tapps Elementary 418 (L TES Replacement) Dieringer Heights Elem. 507 Elementary School No. 3 North Tapps MS Incl 536 NTMS Additions 2009 TOTALS 1461 *Reduced capacity due to 1-3 class sizes. PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS MASTER SCHEDULE May, 2017 6-Year Total Capacity Capacity 2018* 2019 374 495 450 450 536 450 1855 2020 2021 2022 2023 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, May 2017 CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Reserve New Revenue: (x $1,000) Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments TOTAL SOURCES Uses of Funds Elementary School No. 3 L TES Remodel Non-Capacity Projects: School Site, Technology Upgrades, And Board Approved Projects TOTAL USES BALANCE $4,098 $26,191 $30,289 ($23,125) (2,243) (4,921) ($30,289) 0 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 FINANCE PLAN 2018-2023 May, 2017 Permanent Capacity Projects Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source of Funds Estimated Estimated Amt Estimated ·impact Levy, Bond & State Impact Cost Lew, Bond State Match Fees Interest Match Fees Elementary School No. 3 23,125,000 23, 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 L TES Remodel 2,243,000 807,000 0 0 1,436,000 0 0 Total Capacity Projects 25,368,000 23,932,000 0 0 1,436,000 0 0 Non-Capacity Projects School Site Elem. No. 3 700,000 0 0 0 0 0 700,000 Technology Improvements 3,423,000 1,725,000 0 0 1,698,000 0 0 Board Approved Projects 798,000 493,000 0 41000 0 0 264,000 Total Non-Capacity Projects 4,921,000 2,218,000 0 41,000 1,698,000 0 964,000 TOTAL PROJECTS 30,289,000 26,150,000 0 41,000 3,134,000 0 964,000 Time Period 2017 Actual 2017-2022 Growth Elementary Schools $53,220 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2017 Capital Facilities Requirements to 2023 Student Population 1428 95 Student Capacity 1405 450 Net Reserve Or (Deficiency) (23) 355 Dieringer School District Cost Per Student Middle Schools $58,982 (2017 Dollars) Junior High Schools NA High Schools NA Scho()l l111pact Fee C:;ilculati()n __ Sl17 · Dietirt er school Disttict J[)ISTRICT ... . g . . . .. -j_ __ _ Schoo_~ -~-~!~--~~-g~_i_~_i_!i~-~-f~.<?-~!_: _____ J ((AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)xStudent GenerationFactor - -···· ··-·····-----···---------.----:s1l!ciel1i ·-·-'student Facility -!cost/ : Facility Factor : Factor _ _ _;A_ ...• _._c_·._·:_r_._:e_ .• _.· 1 _0:_ 2 g_ •• ·_ 0 e_ 0 .:[·Ac,r_e_$-: :_ 4 ·_._. 1 . __ 9 _:_,:, __ .. _ 4 :_· 9 _ .. ·_'capacity'si'R MFR Elementary " > 450 >0,3?.2 > 0;172 Middle ---..... -. . . . . > << <>><<>>> < < <<< < < < 0:130 :; 0:070 TOTAL - -----t -----$3.596 School Construction Cost: ((F_acil_ityc;ost/Facility_Capacity)xS_tudent Generation Factor)x{perrnanent(Total_Sg Ft) __ _ <:::•:•:<• >•:•:•:•:::•:•:·Fac:ility <::Facility Elerne>ntary_Ng3; .:•::>:•····:•:•:••:_:::•:• . Capacity_ 450 !.~-~p~~-~-iy-~-~~-i-~!!Y __ ~~~~= --------------- Student Student Factor SFR 0.322 0.130 Factor MFR 0.172 0.070 'TOTAL --__ }16,54:iL $16.547 (JFacilityCost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor)x(Temporary/Total Sguare Feet) ·--···-· · ·· ··· · · -··-·------------' -· · -· · -· :st\Jcieni ------sil!cierit ·-· -cosi1 i:%'ierl'1[lf)FacilitY .. . .. Facility Factor Factor SFR Elementary __ Middle !Total SqHCost Size 'SFR :MFR < < / ~g .... > g -K7~8--__ --· ~:~;~: --iTOTAL State Matching Credit: ... ... . . -i _ Boeckh __ ln_d_ex_X SPl0'--l•uu1·e._1:';''''\Jhl".1X' District Match'3X Student Factor Ele_rne>ntgry .. Middle Index :student :student C_ost/ SFR _c;ost/ MFR $_1,923 $ l,923 $8,839 _ c;ost/ MFR Cost/ MFR i-~~--~~~~~~i·_~!-~-~-_ij_~~:-__ ------ $0 ------1---,,,,,:,..-""'-!--,....,,,,.,~ SFR MFR AveraQe_ASSE)SSE)d\(alu_e_20l_ 6 (;()pita! Bond lntere>st Rgtejes!L6fl5 . N etPrese _nt \( alue ol_f\VE)ra9E) D't{elling Prorierty T(lXLevy Rate . _ 2017 ___ , • -U········ $42 ~·'.f§ia :U$?9ij~~ • $3.530.710 $2,405.476 ··:•:•:•:::•::•::••:::•:•:::::ro:: :•:::•:•:::::•::: :fo _,_ __ __, ____ ~----+-: .............. $3.5.751•••··· ·······$~-~751••• Present Value of Revenue Stream $12.623 $8,600 -L ____ _ ______ _.Site Acquistion Costs ____ ,Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost 'State Match Credit 'Tax Payment Credit :FEE - FEE WITH DfaCOUNT OF 503 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 503 , Single N\Uliiple ' ........................... . .••. i Falllily ___ i ____ Family . : . J3,596}4 . }l,923.4 l ! _• _ $16A4J.22 ... $8,838.89 : $Q.OO · $0.00 • --$0,00 j(\00 ' . ·····-···· + _\.,, 2.622 64) -($8.599'.82) $7,521 $2,162 $3,760 $1,081 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Adopted July 25, 2017 BOARD OF EDUCATION Geoffery McAnalloy Claire Wilson Liz Drake Carol Gregory Hiroshi Eto SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 10 Map - Elementary Boundaries 11 Map - Middle School Boundaries 12 Map - High School Boundaries 13 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 14 Building Capacities 15-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 PLAN 31-33 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2018 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2017. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Construction to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students has been in progress since 2014. We are currently nearing the completion of this $106 million project. The District began Phase I in Summer 2014. The newly constructed building, including the majority of the classrooms (Phase II), was ready for use beginning in the 2016-17 school year. The existing cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during construction. Phase III, demolition of the cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen, and construction of athletic fields, will begin this summer and is expected to be completed by Winter 2018. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State continues to phase in funding based on a reduction of K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would further reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3, 22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a Facilities Planning Committee consisting of District staff, parents, and community members. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District’s plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. Through the committee’s work a determination was made to recommend the rebuilding of Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee is also recommending the modernization of Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuild of the aforementioned schools will create additional capacity for 960 students at the elementaries and 200 students at the high school. The expanded capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2017-18 school year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAFA @ Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown Square 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- going Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital bond request II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Capital bond request III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Increased capacity at the five elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 9Six Year Finance PlanSecured FundingSourcesImpact Fees (1)($308,593)Land Sale Funds (2)($4,468,978)Bond or Levy Funds (3) $7,599,847School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (4) $10,549,488TOTAL $13,371,764Projected RevenueSourcesSchool Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (5) $116,000,000Levy Funds (6) $20,000,000Bond Funds (7) $304,000,000Land Fund Sales (8) $0Impact Fees (9) $1,400,000TOTAL $441,400,000Actual and Planned ExpendituresTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $454,771,764NEW SCHOOLS Estimated and Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Total CostPrior Years 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2017-2023MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSIONFederal Way High School (10)$76,000,000$20,000,000 $10,000,000$30,000,000$106,000,000Lake Grove Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Mirror Lake Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Star Lake Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Wildwood Elementary (11) $13,800,000 $13,800,000$27,600,000$27,600,000Olympic View K-8 School (11) $14,700,000 $14,700,000 $14,700,000 $44,100,000$44,100,000Thomas Jefferson High School (11) $37,500,000 $37,500,000 $37,500,000 $37,000,000 $149,500,000$149,500,000SITE ACQUISITIONNorman Center $1,425,000$225,000 $235,000 $235,000 $695,000$2,120,000 (Employment Transtion Program) (12)TEMPORARY FACILITIESPortables (13) $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,400,000$1,400,000TOTAL $77,425,000 $75,625,000 $80,335,000 $15,135,000 $52,400,000 $37,700,000 $37,700,000 $37,200,000 $336,095,000 $413,520,000NOTES:`1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/16. 2. This is year end balance on 12/31/16.3. This is the 12/31/16 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings.4. This represents the balance of SCAP which will be used to to support the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. This is the balance on 12/31/16.5. This is remaining anticipated SCAP for the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. Application for funds was made in July 2013. Also included is the anticipated SCAP for projects included in the upcoming bond measure.6. These include $30m of the $60m six-year levy approved in November 2012.7. In November 2017, the District will have a $450m bond measure on the ballot for voter consideration. The amount included in the finance plan is for those projuects which will create additional capacity.8. Projected sale of surplus properties.9. These are projected fees based upon anticipated residential developments in the District, $25,000 per month over the next 6 years.10. Project budget has been adjusted to match current project cost estimates.11. Project budgets based on current cost estimates.12. Norman Center was purchased in 2010 to house the Employment Transition Program. The $2.1m purchase has been financed through a state approved LOCAL program through 2020.13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and two small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAFA @ Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2018 through 2024 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with McCleary. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, with the implementation of McCleary which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 20 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 20 17 25-28 Grade 3 25 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (4 elementary & 3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites. The District has recently leased space to expand or possibly relocate existing preschool programs. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 17 ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 353 Illahee 855 864 Brigadoon 299 Kilo 779 787 Camelot 277 Lakota 786 794 Enterprise 345 Sacajawea 694 701 Green Gables 401 Sequoyah 585 591 Lake Dolloff 400 Totem 795 803 Lake Grove 353 TAFA @ Saghalie 598 604 Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 183 185 Mark Twain 430 TOTAL 5,275 5,329 Meredith Hill 375 Mirror Lake 262 *Middle School Average 727 735 Nautilus (K-8)466 Olympic View 353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Panther Lake 347 PROGRAM CAPACITY Rainier View 405 Sherwood Forest 390 School Name Headcount FTE Silver Lake 400 Decatur 1243 1,329 Star Lake 337 Federal Way 1684 1,801 Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 1,309 Twin Lakes 341 Todd Beamer 1085 1,160 Valhalla 406 TAFA @ Saghalie 155 166 Wildwood 372 Career Academy at Truman 159 170 Woodmont (K-8)357 Federal Way Public Academy 116 124 TOTAL 8,445 Employment Transition Program 48 51 TOTAL 5,714 6,111 Elementary Average 367 *High School Average 1,309 1,400 Notes: * Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Truman High School, Employment Transition Program and TAFA @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL* INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 12Decatur 81 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Enterprise 21Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1TOTAL 26 1 Lake Dolloff 11 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 1 2 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 6 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 12 Olympic View 11MOT Panther Lake 31TDC 9 Rainier View 41Former TAFA 20 Sherwood Forest 31TOTAL 29 Silver Lake 13 Star Lake 31 Sunnycrest 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 49 26 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 3 Kilo 7 Lakota Sacajawea 3 Sequoyah 2 Totem TAFA @ Saghalie 4 TOTAL 5 14 *Non-instructional portables at Lake Dolloff, Mirror Lake, and Nautilus will be in use as Instructional portables in the 2017-18 school year. PORTABLE LOCATIONS FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20 Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2023. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. An update to the District projections was provided in December 2016. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount; High School FTE = .935Headcount) Total K -12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School FTE Change 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -0.7% 2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6,354 20,384 0.7% 2015 2014-15 9,177 4,884 6,402 20,462 0.4% 2016 2015-16 9,397 5,047 6,273 20,717 1.2% 2017 2016-17 9,589 4,986 6,063 20,638 -0.4% 2018 B2017-18 9,748 5,105 6,063 20,916 1.3% 2019 P2018-19 9,621 5,166 6,178 20,965 0.2% 2020 P2019-20 9,561 5,422 6,149 21,132 0.8% 2021 P2020-21 9,615 5,496 6,209 21,320 0.9% 2022 P2021-22 9,725 5,421 6,359 21,505 0.9% 2023 P2022-23 9,806 5,294 6,548 21,648 0.7% 2024 P2023-24 9,880 5,270 6,689 21,839 0.9% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 School Year Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast FTE FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23 Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 24 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,451 19,451 19,451 19,451 20,091 20,251 20,251 FTE CAPACITY 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 Add Capacity 640 160 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,451 19,451 19,451 20,091 20,251 20,251 20,251 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 19,822 19,822 19,822 20,462 19,982 19,822 19,822 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,916 20,965 21,132 21,320 21,505 21,648 21,839 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE)(315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,601 20,650 20,817 21,005 21,190 21,333 21,524 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (779) (828) (995) (543) (1,208) (1,511) (1,702) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,129 2,171 2,171 2,171 1,898 1,877 1,877 Add New Portable Capacity 42 Subtract Portable Capacity (273) (21) Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,171 2,171 2,171 1,898 1,877 1,877 1,877 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,392 1,343 1,176 1,355 669 366 175 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 25 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 FTE CAPACITY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 Add/Subtract capacity total Add capacity at: Lake Grove 160 Mirror Lake 205 Olympic View 160 Star Lake 145 Wildwood 130 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 9,262 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 9,262 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,748 9,621 9,561 9,615 9,725 9,806 9,880 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,712 9,585 9,525 9,579 9,689 9,770 9,844 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,250) (1,123) (1,063) (477) (427) (508) (582) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 1,029 1,071 1,071 1,071 798 777 777 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at: Nautilus 42 Subtract portable capacity at: Mirror Lake (126) Olympic View (21) Star Lake (63) Wildwood (84) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,071 1,071 1,071 798 777 777 777 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY (179) (52)8 321 350 269 195 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 26 CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 FTE CAPACITY 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 Add/Subtract capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,105 5,166 5,422 5,496 5,421 5,294 5,270 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,031 5,092 5,348 5,422 5,347 5,220 5,196 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 218 157 (99) (173) (98)29 53 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 543 482 226 152 227 354 378 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 27 CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 FTE CAPACITY 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 Add/Subtract capacity Thomas Jefferson High School4 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,063 6,178 6,149 6,209 6,359 6,548 6,689 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 5,858 5,973 5,944 6,004 6,154 6,343 6,484 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 253 138 167 107 (43) (232) (373) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 775 775 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 775 775 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 1,028 913 942 882 732 543 402 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 4 Current project timelines estimate the completion of Thomas Jefferson HS in 2024. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2017 Plan Year 2018 Single Family Units $3,198 $6,842 Multi-Family Units $8,386 $20,086 Mixed-Use Residential1 $4,193 $10,043 A year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 29 STUDENT GENERATIONNEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARSSingle Family Student GenerationNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalSingle Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(17) Hibbford Glen 15 10 2 1 0.6667 0.1333 0.0667 0.8667(17) Vista Pointe 105 16 2 7 0.1524 0.0190 0.0667 0.2381(16) Jefferson Place 11 5 1 1 0.4545 0.0909 0.0909 0.6363(16) Star Lake East 30 3 4 5 0.1000 0.1333 0.1667 0.4000(15) Swan Song 29 7 2 3 0.2414 0.0690 0.1034 0.4138(15) Wynstone East 114 30 21 26 0.2632 0.1842 0.2281 0.6755(14) North Lake Rim 37 4 4 4 0.1081 0.1081 0.1081 0.3243(14) Wynstone 44 13 6 7 0.2955 0.1364 0.1591 0.5910(13) Lake Point 22 3 4 5 0.1364 0.1818 0.2273 0.5455(13) Saghalie Firs 34 6 7 4 0.1765 0.2059 0.1176 0.5000Total441 97 53 63Student Generation*0.2200 0.1202 0.1429 0.4830Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal WayNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalMulti Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(17) Kitt's Corner 216 138 48 54 0.6389 0.2222 0.2500 1.1111(16) Kandila Townhomes 27 3 2 3 0.1111 0.0741 0.1111 0.2963(15) Park 16 293 179 77 116 0.6109 0.2628 0.3959 1.2696Total536 320 127 173Student Generation*0.5970 0.2369 0.3228 1.1567 * Student Generation rate is based on totals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost:Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.2200 0.5970 $0 $0 Middle School 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 4.85 $216,718 51 0.1429 0.3228 $2,942 $6,646 TOTAL $2,942 $6,646 School Construction Cost:Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 94.09% $38,934,000 800 0.2200 0.5970 $10,074 $27,337 Middle School 97.26% 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 96.98% $9,867,000 150 0.1429 0.3228 $9,116 $20,593 TO TAL $19,190 $47,930 Temporary Facility Cost:Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.91% $172,993 42 0.2200 0.5970 $54 $145 Middle School 2.74% 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School 3.02% 0.1429 0.3228 $0 $0 TOTAL $54 $145 State Matching Credit Calculation:Student Student Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $213.23 90 65.59% 0.2200 0.5970 $2,769 $7,515 Middle School $213.23 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School $213.23 130 65.59% 0.1429 0.3228 $2,598 $5,869 Total $5,367 $13,384 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2017) $294,328 $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2017) 3.95% 3.95% Net Present Value of Av erage Dwelling $2,393,217 $890,268 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.31 $1.31 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,135 $1,166 Sing le Family Multi-Family Mixed-Use Residences Residences Residential 1 Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $2,942 6,646$ 6,646$ Permanent Facility Cost $19,190 47,930$ 47,930$ Temporary Facility Cost $54 145$ 145$ State Match Credit (5,367)$ (13,384)$ (13,384)$ Tax Payment Credit (3,135)$ (1,166)$ (1,166)$ Sub-Total 13,683$ 40,171$ 40,171$ 50% Local Share 6,842$ 20,086$ 20,086$ Calculated Impact Fee 6,842$ 20,086$ 10,043$ 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2017 Plan and the 2018 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2018-2024 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule and anticipated new construction based on a November 2017 bond vote. The plan is found on page 9. SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2018 through 2024 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and 33. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 32 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on the estimate for replacing Thomas Jefferson High is $149,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of $89,700,000, which is 60% of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 200 additional seats, with 50 seats dedicated for preschool capacity. Only additional capacity for grade 9-12 seats will be used in the impact fee calculation. The current permanent capacity of Thomas Jefferson High is 1309. The addition of 150 grade 9-12 seats will increase permanent capacity by 11%. Total Cost $149,500,000 x .6 x .11 = $9,867,000 The anticipated cost based on the estimate for replacing Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood elementaries is $154,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of $92,700,000, which is 60% of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 960 additional seats. The additional seats will include new preschool capacity at Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, and Star Lake and 6-8 capacity at Olympic View, as well as adding additional K-5 capacity. Only capacity for grade K-5 seats will be used in the impact fee calculation. The current permanent capacity of these schools is 1902. The addition of 800 grade K-5 seats will increase permanent capacity by 42%. Total Cost $154,500,000 x .6 x .42 = $38,934,000 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. Total Cost $2,100,000 / 2 = $1,050,000 Cost per Acre $1,050,000 / 4.85 = $216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 33 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.30% to 95.86%Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.70% to 4.14%Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $178,686 to $172,993 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $213.23 to $213.23 Change effective July 2016 State Match 65.59% to 65.59%Change effective July 2016 Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $274,781 to $294,328 Service District (ESD 121) MFR- $106,352 to $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.27% to 3.95%Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.37 to $1.31 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Elementary .2471 to .2200 Middle School .1408 to .1202 High School .1379 to .1429 Multi-Family - Elementary .5375 to .5970 Middle School .2813 to .2369 High School .2594 to .3228 Impact Fee SFR- $3,198 to $6,842 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR - $8,386 to $20,086 MFR based on the updated calculation Note: Student generation factors for are single family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Student generation factors for are multi- family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Federal Way Public Schools 33330 8th Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2017