HomeMy WebLinkAbout6825 ORDINANCE NO. 6825
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCES AND REPEALING CHAPTER 9.22 OF THE
AUBURN CITY CODE AND AMENDING ACC 9.24.010 TO
CONFORM WITH ESB 5476
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2021, the Washington Supreme Court issued its
opinion in State v. Blake (197 Wn.2d 170). The Blake decision held RCW 69.50.4013
(the State's felony drug possession law) unconstitutional because the RCW lacked the
legal element of"knowing" possession;
WHEREAS, the State Legislature responded to Blake by passing ESB 5476,
signed into law by Governor Inslee on May 14, 2021. ESB 5476 includes the following
changes to State drug laws:
• Section 9 of ESB 5476 adds the required "knowing" element to RCW 69.50.4013,
and reduces the RCW from a felony to a misdemeanor;
• Section 14 of ESB 5476 decriminalizes the use or delivery of personal use drug
paraphernalia in RCW 69.50.412;
WHEREAS, these law changes allow the City to now prosecute State law drug
possession as a misdemeanor, but also render the City's drug possession and
paraphernalia ordinances in ACC 9.22 obsolete and inconsistent with State law as revised
by ESB 5476;
WHEREAS, State law requires City ordinances to be consistent with State laws.
Given the passage of ESB 5476 and its legal changes,the ordinances in ACC 9.22 should
be repealed;
Ordinance No. 6825
June 17, 2021
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, ACC 9.24.010 should also be amended in light of ESB 5476 to remove
its references to ACC 9.22 and to add precision and clarity to the other parts of that
section.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Repeal of chapter within the Auburn City Code. Auburn City
Code Chapter 9.22 and the following sections and underlying ordinance language within
it are hereby repealed:
ACC 9.22.010 Controlled substances prohibited
ACC 9.22.020 Drug paraphernalia prohibited
ACC 9.22.900 Statutes incorporated by reference
Section 2. Amendment to Auburn City Code. Auburn City Code Section
9.24.010 is amended as set forth in Exhibit A to this ordinance.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those
administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person
or circumstance,will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity
of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Ordinance No. 6825
June 17, 2021
Page 2 of 3
Section 5. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five
days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law.
INTRODUCED: JUN 2 1 2021
PASSED: JUN 2 1 2021
JUN 2 12021
APPROVED:
ANCY KUS, MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk Kendra Comeau, City Attorney
Published: U✓ i 2.10- ( i r1 1 L1A 'ilk C
Ordinance No. 6825
June 17, 2021
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A— ORD. 6825
A. No person may t is unlawful for any person to loiter in or near any public rights-of-
way; or any public or private property in a manner or asunder circumstances
manifesting the intent to engage in illegal drug-related activity contrary to RCW
Chapters 69.41, 69.50, 69.52 or 69.53 RCW. For purposes of this section, "loiter" shall
- .have the same meaning as ACC 9.50.010.A. , or to Chapter.9_22 ACC.
B. The.following'may be considered in determining the intent required by subsection A:
1. Whether the Such person is a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller. For
purposes of this sectionchcshapter,_a "known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller" is a
person who:
a. a-person-who-has'been'icdnvicted in any court within this state of any controlled
;' substarice violation>:within;RCW 69.41, 69.50, 69.52 or 69.53, ora ,
_ ... :_ ,.,.,.,.,,nn + e „tee
_ -_ possession;:orsale'of any:-of the`substances referred to in Chapters 69.41, 69.50, 69.52
and 69.53 RCW, or substantially similar laws of any political subdivision of this or any
other state or of any other state; or
b_who=is known:to.h'ave been arrested for a drug-related crime that not
resulted+eg in the person's participationed in a diversionary
program, deferral program, drug court or-a similar program; or
: b_::.`__ "_______ displays physical characteristics or behaviors of drug intoxication
andof usage, such as "needle tracks"; or
d. who-is in possession of possesses marijuana in a manner not authorized by RCW
X69.50.401,3_(1), 69.50A013(2) and/or in amounts that cxceedinq those set forth in
69.50.360(3);
2. Whether the Such person is currently subject to an order from any court prohibiting
their_presence:in a high drug activity geographic area, such as an order issued pursuant
to ACC 9.24.020 and/or ACC 9.24.030;
3. Whether the Such person's current observed behavior behaves in suchh-a manner-a:
to raise raises a reasonable suspicion that they are currently or are about to engage in
or-is-then-engaged-in-an-unlawful drug-related activity, including iby way of example
only; such person acting as a "lookout";
4. Whether a police officer is able to identify the person based on articulable factors
- - - - • - -- - -- .-- : •.-- - - -- - • - -- - - - - - - , as
member of a "gang;" or aa-association that whish-engages in illegal drug activity. Such
Pastors may - - e e • - - -- - • • -- - - - - - - "- " e- - - -
a gang or association include, but are not limited to clothing, tattoos, known
association and/or affiliation with such a gang or association, specific and observed acts
or circumstances consistent with drug-related activity, and gestures, signs, greetings
and movements that are consistent with gang-related activity. The person's ; provided,
that-clothing alone shall not be sufficient ,- ithout-mor'e,to support such an
identification; . • _ _- _ • '__ _ -- _ _- _ _ -• -• _- _ _ _ _
assesiatieni
5. Whether the Such person is observed furtively transferrings small objects or
packages for currency in a furtive fashion;
6. Whether the Such person flees takesht upon the appearance of a police officer;
7. Whether the Such person manifestly endeavors to conceal themselves or any object
which reasonably could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity;
8. Whether the areawhere;the person is observed loitering is '
repute known to police or to the public as man area of unlawful drug use and trafficking
or;
.. -g:_Tha . -•• - '' - -- - - - . -- • - • _ - ••- • a
place-suspe'cted-o_f..drug activity pursuant to RCW Chapter 69.53RGW; and
_-! 10_ .Whether Aany vehicle involved in the observed activity is registered to a known
unlawful:drug user;=,possessor, or seller, or to a person with for whom there is an
outstanding active bench warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity.
C.. Penalty. Violation of this.section is a gross misdemeanor punishable by up to 364
days in iail and/or a $5,000 fine.