Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-28-2022 3-28-2022 City Council Study Session AgendaCity Council Study Session Muni Services SFA March 28, 2022 - 5:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers and Virtual AGENDA Watch the meeting LIVE! Watch the meeting video Meeting videos are not available until 72 hours after the meeting has concluded. I.CALL TO ORDER II.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION A.Public Participation The Auburn City Council Study Session Meeting scheduled for Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. will be held in person and virtually. Virtual Participation Link: To attend the meeting virtually please click one of the below links, enter the meeting ID into the Zoom app, or call into the meeting at the phone number listed below. The link to the Virtual Meeting is: Zoom: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83410094133 The public can also view the meeting on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/watchauburn/live/?nomobile=1 To join this meeting by phone, please use the below call-in information: 253 215 8782 877 853 5257 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 834 1009 4133 B.Roll Call III.AGENDA ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION A.Ordinance No. 6853 (Tate) (5 Minutes) An Ordinance amending Section 14.22.060 of the Auburn City Code (ACC) to create an exception to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process for Annexations B.Legislative Update (Hinman) (30 Minutes) C.4th Quarter 2021 Financial Report Update (Thomas) (20 Minutes) Page 1 of 88 IV.MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISCUSSION ITEMS A.Ordinance No. 6856 (Caillier) (10 Minutes) An Ordinance amending Section 10.36.268 of the Auburn City Code (ACC) related to vehicle parking for persons with disabilities B.Police Annual Reports (Caillier) (30 Minutes) Presentation of two Police Annual Reports; 2021 Annual Use of Force Review and 2021 Annual CIA Review V.NEW BUSINESS VI.ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. Page 2 of 88 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6853 (Tate) (5 Minutes) Date: March 23, 2022 Department: Community Development Attachments: Draft Ordinance No. 6853 Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Schedule Ordinance No. 6853 for action by City Council on April 4, 2022 Background for Motion: Background Summary: Chapters 35.10 and 35.13 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) establish the procedures and requirements that govern annexations. Within both RCW’s there is recognition that a comprehensive plan may be amended in conjunction with the process for annexation. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 establishes the process for amending Auburn’s Comprehensive plan. ACC 14.22.060 sets for the exceptions to the comp plan amendment process. Amendments associated with an annexation are not included in the list of exceptions. Ordinance 6853 seeks to correct ACC 14.22.060 by recognizing that comp plan amendments that are associated with an annexation do not need to follow the amendment procedures outlined in Chapter 14.22 ACC. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Stearns Staff:Tate Meeting Date:March 28, 2022 Item Number: Page 3 of 88 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6853 March 28, 2022 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6853 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 14.22.060 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE TO CREATE AN EXCEPTION TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS FOR ANNEXATIONS. WHEREAS, Chapter 35.13 RCW establishes the procedures and requirements that govern annexation of unincorporated areas into incorporated areas; and WHEREAS, Chapter 35.10 RCW establishes the procedures and requirements that govern annexation or transfer of areas from one city to another city; and WHEREAS, Chapter 35A.14 RCW establishes the procedures and requirements that govern annexation of unincorporated areas into incorporated code cities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 14.22 of the Auburn City Code (“ACC”) establishes the local procedures and requirements for amending the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, Section 14.22.060.C ACC lists the exceptions to the procedures for amending the comprehensive plan and does not identify annexation as an exception; and WHEREAS, amendments to Section 14.22.060.C ACC are necessary in order to establish annexation as an exception to the comprehensive plan amendment process. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Section 14.22.060 of the Auburn City Code is amended to read as attached in Exhibit A. Page 4 of 88 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6853 March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 3 Section 2. Constitutionality and Invalidity. If any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _________________________ PASSED: _____________________________ APPROVED: ___________________________ CITY OF AUBURN ATTEST: _____ NANCY BACKUS, Mayor _________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Kendra Comeau, City Attorney Published: Page 5 of 88 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6853 March 28, 2022 Page 3 of 3 14.22.060 Amendments and exceptions. A. The comprehensive plan may only be amended pursuant to this chapter, no more frequently than once each calendar year as part of the annual cycle established herein, except as provided in subsection C of this section. B. All amendments shall be considered concurrently so as to assess their cumulative impact. C. Exceptions. Pursuant to Chapter 35A.70 RCW, under the following circumstances, amendments may be processed separately and in addition to the annual amendment cycle: 1. If an emergency exists, which is defined as an issue of community-wide significance that addresses the public health, safety, and general welfare; 2. To resolve an appeal of a comprehensive plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board or with the court; 3. To adopt or amend a shoreline master program under the procedures set forth in Chapter 90.58 RCW; 4. The initial adoption of a subarea plan or new element to the comprehensive plan; 5. The amendment of the capital facilities plan may occur concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the city budget. 6. Amendments of the comprehensive plan that are conducted in conjunction with an annexation as set forth in Titles 35 and 35A RCW. Page 6 of 88 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: 4th Quarter 2021 Financial Report Update (Thomas) (20 Minutes) Date: March 15, 2022 Department: Finance Attachments: Financial Report Through December 2021 Budget Impact: Administrative Recommendation: For discussion only. Background for Motion: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Baggett Staff:Thomas Meeting Date:March 28, 2022 Item Number: Page 7 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 General Fund Summary $22.8 $19.2 $15.1 $5.9 $0.9 $2.3 $7.2 $3.0 $48.4 $26.8 $10.0 $5.1 $23.2 $24.5 $6.6 $1.6 $2.3 $8.0 $3.4 $44.3 $21.8 $9.9 $4.8 $14.7 PropertyTaxesSalesTaxesOtherTaxesIntergovernmental(Grants, etc.)DevelopmentService FeesCulture &RecreationOther Fees& ChargesOtherRevenuesPersonnelSupplies& ServicesOtherExpendituresTransfersOutRevenues Expenditures $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 Millions2021Budget 2021Actuals(Favorable) 2021Actuals(Unfavorable) General Fund Revenues and Expenditures (Through December 2021)$76.4 $90.2$84.4 $80.9 Total Revenues Total Expenditures $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 Millions$1.4 $1.3 $5.1 $3.8 $4.6 $5.4 $1.3 $5.9 $31.5 $3.5 $14.3 $4.0 $8.0 $1.1 $1.2 $4.2 $3.3 $4.0 $5.0 $1.2 $5.6 $29.5 $3.5 $12.1 $3.8 $6.4 Council& MayorAdministrativeServicesHumanResourcesFinanceCity AttorneyCommunityDevelopmentCommunity &Human ServicesJail - SCOREPolicePublicWorksParks, Arts& RecreationStreetsNon-Departmental$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 Millions2021 Budget 2021 Actuals(Favorable) 2021 Actuals(Unfavorable) General Fund Expenditures by Department (Through December 2021) Page 8 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 2 General Fund 2020 Summary of Sources and Uses Annual YE YE YE Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Operating Revenues Property Tax 6 22,842,300$ 22,842,300$ 23,234,591$ 22,445,340$ 392,291$ 1.7 % Retail Sales Tax 3, 6-8 16,947,000 16,947,000 21,602,471 18,855,889 4,655,471 27.5 % Affordable Housing Sales Tax Credit 123,700 123,700 155,794 149,445 32,094 25.9 % Sales Tax - Pierce County Parks 99,700 99,700 129,875 111,038 30,175 30.3 % Criminal Justice Sales Tax 2,034,000 2,034,000 2,614,952 2,265,134 580,952 28.6 % Brokered Natural Gas Tax 130,000 130,000 151,567 151,369 21,567 16.6 % City Utilities Tax 3, 8-10 6,471,400 6,471,400 6,372,408 4,540,292 (98,992)(1.5)% Admissions Tax 10 320,000 320,000 169,752 209,091 (150,248)(47.0)% Electric Tax 8-10 3,723,200 3,723,200 3,790,297 4,206,456 67,097 1.8 % Natural Gas Tax 8-10 1,116,900 1,116,900 1,082,748 1,254,700 (34,152)(3.1)% Cable Franchise Fee 876,900 876,900 912,416 902,977 35,516 4.1 % Cable Utility Tax 960,000 960,000 962,553 1,149,682 2,553 0.3 % Cable Franchise Fee - Capital 60,000 60,000 57,104 61,346 (2,896)(4.8)% Telephone Tax 8-10 765,400 765,400 679,925 1,122,804 (85,475)(11.2)% Solid Waste Tax (external)8-10 112,500 112,500 196,733 231,046 84,233 74.9 % Leasehold Excise Tax 210,000 210,000 222,050 224,090 12,050 5.7 % Gambling Excise Tax 11 307,000 307,000 124,965 109,986 (182,035) (59.3)% Taxes sub-total 57,100,000$ 57,100,000$ 62,460,200$ 57,990,683$ 5,360,200$ 9.4 % Business License Fees 11-12 385,400$ 385,400$ 424,315$ 353,802$ 38,915$ 10.1 % Building Permits 12-13 858,400 858,400 1,293,979 835,588 435,579 50.7 % Other Licenses & Permits 785,600 785,600 1,218,809 897,189 433,209 55.1 % Intergovernmental (Grants, etc.)4, 14 5,927,620 5,927,620 6,589,515 10,223,904 661,895 11.2 % Charges for Services:15-17 General Government Services 15 3,474,060 3,474,060 3,329,054 2,971,348 (145,006)(4.2)% Public Safety 15 929,900 929,900 1,270,737 1,109,581 340,837 36.7 % Development Services Fees 15-16 896,100 896,100 1,626,502 955,824 730,402 81.5 % Culture and Recreation 15-17 2,282,630 2,282,630 2,339,300 1,638,185 56,670 2.5 % Fines and Penalties 17-18 722,200 722,200 434,042 635,209 (288,158) (39.9)% Fees/Charges/Fines sub-total 16,261,910$ 16,261,910$ 18,526,253$ 19,620,631$ 2,264,343$ 13.9 % Interest and Investment Earnings 19 138,800$ 138,800$ 95,542$ 506,385$ (43,258)$ (31.2)% Rents and Leases 19 924,700 924,700 1,127,408 432,432 202,708 21.9 % Contributions and Donations 19 28,000 28,000 31,182 30,945 3,182 11.4 % Other Miscellaneous 19 217,800 217,800 241,751 200,414 23,951 11.0 % Transfers In 1,595,900 1,595,900 1,538,372 2,081,527 (57,528)(3.6)% Insurance Recoveries - Capital & Operating 100,000 100,000 406,067 189,322 306,067 306.1 % Other Revenues sub-total 3,005,200$ 3,005,200$ 3,440,323$ 3,441,025$ 435,123$ 14.5 % Total Operating Revenues 76,367,110$ 76,367,110$ 84,426,776$ 81,052,339$ 8,059,666$ 10.6 % Operating Expenditures Council & Mayor 1,372,602$ 1,372,602$ 1,130,366$ 950,412$ 242,236$ 17.6 % Administration 1,302,028 1,302,028 1,195,017 3,408,641 107,011 8.2 % Human Resources 1,981,431 1,981,431 1,745,216 1,598,724 236,215 11.9 % Municipal Court & Probation 3,160,261 3,160,261 2,473,775 2,675,734 686,486 21.7 % Finance 3,833,612 3,833,612 3,342,944 3,086,689 490,668 12.8 % City Attorney 4,624,809 4,624,809 3,959,192 2,360,532 665,617 14.4 % Community Development 5,435,908 5,435,908 4,970,932 4,294,915 464,976 8.6 % Community & Human Services (Comm Devel)1,294,797 1,294,797 1,188,683 992,927 106,114 8.2 % Jail - SCORE 5,851,600 5,851,600 5,583,799 4,565,099 267,801 4.6 % Police 31,522,421 31,522,421 29,535,230 28,456,544 1,987,191 6.3 % Public Works 3,529,062 3,529,062 3,450,243 3,628,787 78,819 2.2 % Parks, Arts & Recreation 14,307,108 14,307,108 12,050,998 10,770,987 2,256,110 15.8 % Streets 3,992,068 3,992,068 3,786,304 3,546,286 205,764 5.2 % Non-Departmental 7,971,570 7,971,570 6,449,917 2,750,054 1,521,653 19.1 % Total Operating Expenditures 90,179,277$ 90,179,277$ 80,862,617$ 73,086,331$ 9,316,660$ 10.3 % Page Ref 2021 2021 YE Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage Page 9 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 3 Executive Summary This report provides an overview of the City’s overall financial position for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2021, reflecting financial data available as of February 10, 2022. General Fund: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some General Fund revenues were lower than the pre- pandemic levels. During 2021, various restrictions were implemented at the state and local level in terms of occupancy limits, vaccination requirements, and mask mandates, all of which are thought to have either directly or indirectly affected the local economy. In late March, both King and Pierce counties advanced to Phase III of the state’s Healthy Washington Roadmap to Recovery plan. Phase III allowed businesses to have indoor dining occupancy up to 50%; retail, fitness and competitive sports at 50% occupancy; and indoor entertainment venues like theaters, concerts, museums, bowling alleys, cardrooms, zoos, etc. were allowed to reopen with restrictions. At the end of June, Washington state reopened under the Washington Ready plan. Industry sectors previously covered by the Roadmap to Recovery or the Safe Start plan (with limited exceptions) were allowed to return to usual capacity and operations. Throughout the third quarter of 2021, businesses were able to resume normal operations but some businesses continued to have modified hours and/or capacity restrictions. Effective in October 2021, all restaurants in King County were to require indoor dining patrons to show proof of vaccination. The indoor mask mandate also continued throughout Q4-2021. Note: In 2020 to help close the revenue gap due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City implemented several short-term policy changes in 2020. All of those policy changes were discontinued in 2021. Overall, General Fund revenues collected through Q4-2021 totaled $84.4 million as compared to a year end budget of $76.4 million, and were $8.1 million, or 10.6% above budget expectations. Notable variances to the 2021 budget include:  Retail Sales Tax: The sales tax report through December 2021 (which is provided as an attachment to this report) reflects amounts remitted to the City of Auburn based on sales from November 2020 through October 2021. Total retail sales tax revenue collected through December 2021 totaled $21.6 million and was $4.7 million, or 27.5%, above budget. Collections in 2021 were $2.7 million, or 14.6%, more than what was collected in 2020. The retail trade, automotive, and the services categories reported the highest increases in sales in 2021. [pages 6-8]  In 2021, City Council increased the City utility tax rate from 7.0% to 10.0%. 1.0% of utility tax revenue continued to support the Arterial Street Preservation Fund while this change increased General Fund tax revenues for Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste services from the previous 6.0% to 9.0%. City utility tax revenues through Q4-2021 were $0.1 million unfavorable to budget although they were $1.8 million higher than what was collected in 2020. [pages 8-10]  Building permit revenues collected in 2021 totaled $1.3 million and were $436,000, or 50.7%, above budget. There were four significant commercial projects in the City that contributed to higher-than-anticipated revenues this year, including the replacement of two elementary schools. The total number of building permits issued in 2021 totaled 515, which is 40 more (8.4%) than the number issued in 2020. [pages 12-13] Page 10 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 4  Intergovernmental revenues collected in 2021 totaled $6.6 million and were $662,000 favorable to budget. The majority of this variance was due primarily to the unbudgeted receipt of $500,000 in Streamlined Sales Tax mitigation monies. [page 14]  Development services revenues collected in 2021 totaled $1.6 million and were $730,000 higher than budget. This variance was primarily due to higher than anticipated revenues received for plan check fees; these totaled $887,000, representing the highest year of revenues collected since 2015. [pages 15-16] General Fund expenditures through Q4-2021 totaled $80.9 million compared to a budget of $90.2 million, representing a $9.3 million favorable variance to budget. All departments operated within their budgets in 2021. Of this favorable variance to budget, $4.5 million was due to underspends in services and charges, including charges for 911 services paid to Valley Communications, payments to the King County District Court for services rendered, reduced expenditures in the Parks Department due to suspended and/or reduced services due to the pandemic, as well as cost savings in travel expenditures also due to the pandemic. An additional $4.1 million of the favorable variance was due to staff vacancies and medical and dental benefit cost savings. ​YE Budget $76.4 M ​YE Budget $90.2 M ​YE Actuals $84.4 M ​YE Actuals $80.9 M $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 $65 $70 $75 $80 $85 $90 $95 $100 Revenues Expenditures $ Millions General Fund Revenues vs. Expenditures Through December 2021 Page 11 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 5 Street Funds: The City’s three street funds are special revenue funds wherein the revenue sources and expenditures are legally restricted. These funds are used for street capital construction projects, as well as local and arterial street repair and preservation projects. Historically, the majority of expenditures in all three street funds occur during the second half of the year when weather conditions are optimal for pavement construction. Variances in budget and actuals between years are generally due to the schedule and level of activity on projects in the fund, and the timing of grant reimbursements and other funding. In 2021, Arterial Street Fund revenues totaled $3.5 million as compared to revenues of $2.6 million in 2020, while expenditures totaled $3.7 million as compared to expenditures of $3.1 million in 2020. [pages 22–23] Local Street Fund revenues of $1.5 million compare to revenues of $1.9 million in 2020. Expenditures in 2021 were $1.5 million as compared with $1.2 million in 2020. [pages 24–25] Lastly, Arterial Street Preservation Fund revenues totaled $3.5 million in 2021. Expenditures totaled $4.0 million compared to $2.3 million through last year. [pages 26–27] Enterprise Funds: The City’s enterprise funds account for operations with revenues primarily provided from user fees, charges or contracts for services. The Water Fund ended 2021 with operating income of $4.9 million, approximately $541,000 below the same period last year due to increased expenditures. [page 29] The Sewer Fund had operating income of $1.1 million in 2021 versus $1.9 million last year. Increased consumption revenues were offset by interfund utility taxes and increased personnel costs, leading to a decrease in operating income from 2020. [page 30] Through December 2021 the Stormwater Fund had operating income of $2.3 million compared to $3.3 million in 2020; this variance is largely due to increased interfund utility taxes, personnel costs, fleet and support costs. [page 30] The Solid Waste Fund had an operating loss of $2.4 million in 2021 compared to a loss of $114,000 in 2020; higher service revenues were offset by increased payments to the City’s primary solid waste vendor and interfund utility taxes. [pages 30-32] The Airport Fund experienced operating income of $347,000 through December 2021, compared to $604,000 last year. This variance is largely attributable to fuel inventory purchases, as well as personnel, fleet, and repair and maintenance costs. [page 32] The Cemetery Fund had operating income of $597,000 in 2021, compared with operating income of $228,000 last year. This increase in largely attributable to increased sales revenues. [page 32] Internal Service Funds: Internal service funds provide services to other City departments and include functions such as Insurance, Worker’s Compensation, Facilities, Innovation & Technology, and Equipment Rental. No significant variances were reported in these funds in 2021. [page 32] Page 12 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 6 General Fund Revenues The combined total of property, sales/use, utility, gambling, and admissions taxes provides over 70% of all resources supporting general governmental activities. The following section provides additional information on these sources. Property Tax collections in 2021 totaled $23.2 million as compared to a budget of $22.8 million. As depicted in the graphic below, the majority of property taxes are collected during the months of April and October, coinciding with the due dates for the County property tax billings. The COVID- 19 pandemic had minimal, if any, impact to property tax revenues. Retail Sales Tax collections through Q4-2021 totaled $21.6 million, representing taxes remitted to the City of Auburn based on sales from November 2020 through October 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 retail sales tax revenue projection was reduced to account for expected business closures and/or occupancy restrictions combined with a slower economy due to higher than usual unemployment rates. However, due to stronger than anticipated sales in several categories (including retail trade, automotive and services), sales tax revenues collected in 2021 were $4.7 million, or 27.5%, higher than budgeted. As depicted on the graphic on the following page, 2021 sales tax revenues were higher than the prior five years – and, in fact, 2021 sales tax collections were the highest on record for the City of Auburn. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.0 $22.0 $24.0 $26.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsProperty Taxes 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual Page 13 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 7 Note: The increase in sales tax revenue from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to a policy change whereby sales tax on construction revenue is retained in the General Fund; previously, a portion was transferred to street funds. Of the year-over-year increase in sales tax revenue depicted in the graphic above from 2018 to 2019, $2.2 million of the $2.9 million increase was due to this policy change. $0.0 $5.0 $10.0 $15.0 $20.0 $25.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsRetail Sales & Use Tax 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual $14.6 $14.9 $15.9 $18.8 $18.9 $21.6 $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.0 $22.0 $24.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsRetail Sales & Use Tax Actuals Page 14 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 8 The following table breaks out the City’s retail sales taxes by major business sector. Citywide retail sales tax revenues collected in 2021 were $2.8 million, or 15.0%, more than collections in 2020. The greatest year-over-year revenue increases were in the retail trade and automotive sectors. Utility Taxes consist of interfund taxes on City utilities (Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste) and taxes on external utilities (Electric, Natural Gas, Telephone and Solid Waste). As noted on page 3 of this report, Council increased the City utility tax rate from 7.0% to 10.0% effective in 2021. While 1.0% of this tax revenue continues to support the Arterial Street Preservation Fund, this change increased General Fund tax revenue for Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste services from the previous 6.0% to 9.0%. Overall, City utility tax revenues collected through December 2021 were $1.8 million more than what was collected through December 2020. The year-over-year increase was predominately due to the rate change. 2020 2021 Component Group Actual Actual Amount Construction 3,068,164$ 3,034,111$ (34,053)$ (1.1)% Manufacturing 389,637 501,480 111,843 28.7 % Transportation & Warehousing 197,189 373,108 175,919 89.2 % Wholesale Trade 1,346,271 1,423,595 77,323 5.7 % Automotive 3,826,981 4,555,224 728,244 19.0 % Retail Trade 5,499,535 6,461,966 962,431 17.5 % Services 4,220,223 4,924,232 704,009 16.7 % Miscellaneous 307,887 409,506 101,619 33.0 % YE Total 18,855,888$ 21,683,222$ 2,827,334$ 15.0 % Comparison of Retail Sales Tax Collections by Group Through December Change from 2020 Percentage Page 15 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 9 $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsUtility Tax 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual 25 $10.0 $10.2 $9.9 $9.6 $11.4 $12.1 $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsUtility Tax Revenues Actuals Page 16 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 10 The table below demonstrates the various utility tax revenues and show actual revenues compared to budget. An Admission Tax of 5.0% is placed on charges for general admission, season tickets, cover charges, etc. Admission tax revenues collected through December 2021 totaled $170,000 and were $150,000 unfavorable to budget. This is due in part to COVID-19 restrictions, whereby some entertainment businesses did not reopen until the second quarter of 2021. For example, the primary remitter of admission tax to the City of Auburn is the Auburn Regal Cinema at the Outlet Collection mall. The theater was closed during the first quarter of this year, and taxes that were remitted in the remaining quarters were approximately ½ of the pre-pandemic collection rate. 2020 2021 2021 Utility Tax Type YE Actual YE Budget YE Actual Amount Amount City Interfund Utility Taxes 4,540,292$ 6,471,400$ 6,372,408$ $ 1,832,116 40.4 % $ (98,992)(1.5)% Electric 4,206,456 3,723,200 3,790,297 (416,159)(9.9)%67,097 1.8 % Natural Gas 1,254,700 1,116,900 1,082,748 (171,952)(13.7)%(34,152)(3.1)% Telephone 1,122,804 765,400 679,925 (442,879)(39.4)%(85,475)(11.2)% Solid Waste (external)231,046 112,500 196,733 (34,313)(14.9)%84,233 74.9 % YE Total 11,355,297$ 12,189,400$ 12,122,110$ $ 766,813 6.8 % $ (67,290)(0.6)% Through December 2021 Utility Tax by Type 2021 vs. 2020 Actual 2021 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage $0.0 $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 $400.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecThousandsAdmission Tax 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual Page 17 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 11 Gambling Tax applies to all card games, punch board games, pull tabs, bingo games, raffles and amusement games played within City limits. Due to COVID-19 occupancy limitations, some of these establishments did not reopen for business until the latter part of Q1-2021 and many opened at a reduced capacity. While capacity limitations were lifted at the end of Q2, the effects on these entertainment style activities continue to be evident due to reduced receipts compared to normal levels. Licenses and Permits include business licenses, building permits, plumbing, electric and other licenses and permit fees. Building permit fees and business licenses make up approximately 70% of the annual budgeted revenue in this category. The City charges an annual fee of $100 for a Business License for each business that is located within the City. The City typically sends out the renewals for the following year around December of each year. Therefore, the majority of these revenues are collected in December for the following year or in January in the current year. Business license revenues collected through Q4- 2021 totaled $424,000 and were $39,000, or 10.1%, favorable to budget. $0.0 $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 $400.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecThousandsGambling Tax 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual Page 18 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 12 Building Permit revenues collected in 2021 totaled $1.3 million and were $436,000 favorable to budget. A total of 515 building permits were issued in 2021 compared to 475 building permits issued in 2020, representing an 8.4% increase in permitting volumes. Of the building permit revenues collected in 2021, 61% were attributable to commercial projects and the remaining 39% were predominately single-family housing permits. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecThousandsBusiness Licenses 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual $225 $163 $353 $336 $354 $424 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021ThousandsBusiness License Revenues Actuals Page 19 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 13 There were several large projects that contributed to the building permit revenues in 2021 – most notably the permitting for the new Logisticenter and Prologis businesses in Auburn. In addition, 2021 included the permitting for the replacement of Lea Hill Elementary School and the replacement of Chinook Elementary School as well as numerous building permits for Boeing. There were also dozens of new homes permitted in the City in 2021 including several homes in North Ridgeview Estates, Forest Glen, Huntington Woods and the Aston Park community. As depicted in the graphic below, building permit revenues collected in 2021 were the highest seen since 2016. $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsBuilding Permits 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual $2.0 $1.2 $0.9 $1.2 $0.8 $1.3 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsBuilding Permits Actuals Page 20 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 14 Intergovernmental revenues include grants and stimulus monies (direct and indirect federal, state and local), revenue from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) compact as well as state shared revenues. Collections through Q4-2021 totaled $6.6 million and were $662,000 favorable to budget expectations. Most of this favorable variance was due to the unbudgeted receipt of $500,000 for Streamlined Sales Tax mitigation monies collected in September and December 2021. 2020 2021 2021 Revenue YE Actual YE Budget YE Actual Amount Amount Federal Grants 4,098,926$ 139,580$ 118,696$ $(3,980,230)(97.1)% $ (20,884)(15.0)% State Grants 155,813 260,800 88,035 (67,777)(43.5)%(172,765)(66.2)% Interlocal Grants 468,349 489,840 440,385 (27,964)0.0 %(49,455)(10.1)% Muckleshoot Casino Services 1,721,249 925,000 1,157,990 (563,259)(32.7)%232,990 25.2 % One-Time Allocation (SB 5092)0 331,500 331,542 331,542 N/A %42 0.0 % State Shared Revenues: Streamlined Sales Tax 494,830 1,000,000 1,500,237 1,005,408 203.2 %500,237 50.0 % Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 1,498,329 1,046,300 1,046,790 (451,539)(30.1)%490 0.0 % Criminal Justice - High Crime 228,428 212,200 250,148 21,720 9.5 %37,948 17.9 % Criminal Justice - Population 25,601 26,600 27,323 1,722 6.7 %723 2.7 % Criminal Justice - Special Prog.91,623 97,400 97,288 5,665 6.2 %(112)(0.1)% Marijuana Excise Tax 172,010 183,600 189,789 17,779 10.3 %6,189 3.4 % State DUI 11,878 11,800 13,602 1,724 14.5 %1,802 15.3 % Fire Insurance Tax 85,819 87,500 98,371 12,552 14.6 %10,871 12.4 % Liquor Excise 515,087 465,500 581,922 66,835 13.0 %116,422 25.0 % Liquor Profit 655,964 650,000 647,396 (8,568)(1.3)%(2,604)(0.4)% Total State Shared:3,779,568 3,780,900 4,452,866 673,298 17.8 %671,966 17.8 % YE Total 10,223,904$ 5,927,620$ 6,589,515$ (3,634,390)$ (35.5)%661,895$ 11.2 % Through December 2021 Intergovernmental Revenues (Grants, Entitlements & Services) 2021 vs. 2020 Actual 2021 vs. Budget % Change % Change $5.7 $6.1 $6.3 $6.0 $10.2 $6.6 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsIntergovernmental Revenues (Grants, Entitlements & Services) Actuals Page 21 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 15 Charges for Services consist of general governmental service charges, public safety charges, development service fees, and culture and recreation fees. Total charges for services collected in 2021 totaled $8.6 million and was $983,000, or 13.0%, more than budgeted. The General Government revenue category primarily includes the interfund assessment for the salary and benefit costs for support departments (Finance, Human Resources and the Legal Department). Salary and benefit costs for these support departments are charged to the respective General Fund home department and a portion of those costs are recouped from other funds via interfund charges. General Government revenues also include revenues for passport services, reimbursement from cities participating in the South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP), as well as transportation projects. The majority of the unfavorable variance to budget in the general government category through Q4-2021 was due to a transportation project that was discontinued and did not result in revenues in 2021. Public safety revenues mostly consist of revenues for law enforcement services, which are extra duty security services whereby police officers are contracted for and reimbursement is made by the hiring agency. This category also includes reimbursements from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) for a full-time dedicated police officer and associated expenditures as well as monies collected from the Auburn School District for services rendered. Public safety revenues collected in 2021 totaled $1.3 million and were $341,000 favorable to budget primarily due to stronger than anticipated requests for extra duty security services. Development services fee collections consist primarily of plan check fees, facility extension charges, and zoning and subdivision fees. Through Q4-2021, development service fees collected totaled $1.6 million and were $730,000 favorable to budget expectations. This variance was seen primarily in plan check revenues which generated $887,000 in revenues in 2021 as compared to $375,000 collected in 2020. The year-over-year increase in plan check revenues represents an increase of 236%. Plan check revenues in 2021 included plan review revenues for Logisticenter, Prologis, Boeing, the replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School, Lea Hill Elementary School and Chinook Elementary School. In addition, there were permits issued for multiple other commercial projects as well as numerous residential projects including plans for dozens of new single-family homes in the City. 2020 2021 2021 Revenue YE Actual YE Budget YE Actual Amount Amount General Government 2,971,348$ 3,474,060$ 3,329,054$ $ 357,706 12.0 % $ (145,006)(4.2)% Public Safety 1,109,581 929,900 1,270,737 161,156 14.5 %340,837 36.7 % Development Services 955,824 896,100 1,626,502 670,678 70.2 %730,402 81.5 % Culture & Recreation 1,638,185 2,282,630 2,339,300 701,115 42.8 %56,670 2.5 % YE Total 6,674,939$ 7,582,690$ 8,565,593$ 1,890,654$ 28.3 % $ 982,903 13.0 % Through December 2021 Charges for Services by Type 2021 vs. 2020 Actual 2021 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage Page 22 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 16 The majority of culture and recreation revenues are derived from greens fees and pro shop sales at the Auburn Golf Course, recreational classes, ticket sales at the Auburn Avenue Theater, senior programs, and special events. Overall, these revenues exceeded budget by $57,000, or 2.5%. Of revenues collected in 2021, nearly all revenues related to recreation classes, cultural arts, theater and special events performed unfavorably to budget; these variances were offset by positive variances in green fee revenues collected at the Auburn Golf Course, which totaled $1.5 million and were $350,000 higher than budgeted. A number of factors contributed to lower-than-expected revenues within this category, including the COVID-19 pandemic (where many of these activities were halted and/or modified during 2021) as well as a large fire occurred in July to a mixed-use building on Main Street, affecting the Auburn Avenue Theatre. The theater was eventually “red tagged” in December due to unsafe conditions and continues to be closed for business. $1.0 $0.9 $0.9 $1.1 $1.0 $1.6 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsDevelopment Service Fees Actuals Page 23 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 17 Fines & Penalties include civil penalties (such as code compliance fines), parking and traffic infraction penalties, criminal fines (including criminal traffic, criminal non-traffic and other criminal offenses) as well as non-court fines such as false alarm fines. Total revenues collected in 2021 totaled $434,000 as compared to a budget of $722,000 and were 39.9% below budget expectations primarily due to lower-than-budgeted collections in civil infraction penalties and parking infractions. $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 $2.0 $2.2 $2.4 $2.6 $2.8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsCulture & Recreation 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual 2020 2021 2021 Month YE Actual YE Budget YE Actual Amount Amount Civil Penalties 22,436$ 25,200$ 20,090$ $ (2,346)(10.5)% $ (5,110)(20.3)% Civil Infraction Penalties 270,885 412,000 194,953 (75,932)(28.0)%(217,047)(52.7)% Redflex Photo Enforcement 1,411 0 3,413 2,001 141.8 %3,413 N/A % Parking Infractions 69,073 120,000 78,685 9,611 13.9 %(41,315)(34.4)% Criminal Traffic Misdemeanor 26,197 40,000 36,173 9,976 38.1 %(3,827)(9.6)% Criminal Non-Traffic Fines 23,752 31,000 20,127 (3,625)(15.3)%(10,873)(35.1)% Criminal Costs 19,547 12,000 25,675 6,128 31.4 %13,675 114.0 % Non-Court Fines & Penalties 201,907 82,000 54,925 (146,982)(72.8)%(27,075)(33.0)% YE Total 635,209$ 722,200$ 434,042$ $ (201,168)(31.7)% $ (288,158)(39.9)% Through December 2021 Fines & Penalties by Type 2021 vs. 2020 Actual 2021 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage Page 24 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 18 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $0.3 $0.4 $0.5 $0.6 $0.7 $0.8 $0.9 $1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsFines & Penalties 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual 24 25 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.6 $0.4 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsFines & Penalties Actuals Page 25 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 19 Miscellaneous Revenues consist of investment earnings, income from facility rentals, revenue collected for golf cart rentals at the Auburn Golf Course, contributions and donations, and other income including the quarterly purchasing card (P-card) rebate monies. Revenues collected in 2021 in this category totaled $1.5 million and were $187,000 favorable to budget. The majority of the favorable variance to budget was in the rents and leases category, largely due to increased revenues collected for golf cart rentals. 2020 2021 2021 Month YE Actual YE Budget YE Actual Amount Amount Interest & Investments 506,385$ 138,800$ 95,542$ (410,843)$ (81.1)%(43,258)$ (31.2)% Rents & Leases 432,432 924,700 1,127,408 694,976 160.7 %202,708 21.9 % Contributions & Donations 30,945 28,000 31,182 238 0.8 %3,182 11.4 % Other Miscellaneous Revenue 200,414 217,800 241,751 41,337 20.6 %23,951 11.0 % YE Total 1,170,176$ 1,309,300$ 1,495,884$ 325,708$ 27.8 %186,584$ 14.3 % Miscellaneous Revenues by Type Through December 2021 2021 vs. 2020 2021 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 $1.2 $1.5 $1.8 $1.8 $1.2 $1.5 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsMiscellaneous Revenues Actuals Page 26 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 20 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues are taxes on the sale of both commercial properties and single-family residences, and are receipted into the Capital Improvement Projects Fund and used for governmental capital projects. REET revenues collected in 2021 totaled $6.0 million, exceeding budget expectations by $4.0 million. Sales activity in the fourth quarter of 2021 included the sale of numerous commercial businesses such as a large condo complex, a mobile home park, multiple industrial properties, warehouses, several multifamily properties, vacant land, and numerous single-family homes. REET revenue collections in 2021 were the highest on record for the City of Auburn. 2020 2021 2021 Month Actual Budget Actual Amount Amount Jan 214,936$ 162,000$ 328,140$ 113,204$ 52.7 %166,140$ 102.6 % Feb 455,986 162,000 244,189 (211,797)(46.4)%82,189 50.7 % Mar 214,029 162,000 423,532 209,502 97.9 %261,532 161.4 % Apr 273,949 162,000 385,966 112,017 40.9 %223,966 138.3 % May 245,815 162,000 339,074 93,259 37.9 %177,074 109.3 % Jun 288,495 162,000 447,063 158,568 55.0 %285,063 176.0 % Jul 392,753 162,000 563,422 170,669 43.5 %401,422 247.8 % Aug 368,252 162,000 585,227 216,975 58.9 %423,227 261.3 % Sep 346,819 162,000 946,209 599,390 172.8 %784,209 484.1 % Oct 444,623 162,000 393,570 (51,053)(11.5)%231,570 142.9 % Nov 439,428 162,000 474,992 35,564 8.1 %312,992 193.2 % Dec 554,308 162,500 825,919 271,611 49.0 %663,419 408.3 % YE Total 4,239,394$ 1,944,500$ 5,957,304$ 1,717,910$ 40.5 %4,012,804$ 206.4 % Real Estate Excise Tax Revenues December 2021 2021 vs. 2020 2021 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsReal Estate Excise Tax 2021 Budget 2021 YE Actual 2020 Actual Page 27 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 23 24 $4.3 $3.6 $3.8 $5.2 $4.2 $6.0 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsReal Estate Excise Tax Revenues Actuals Page 28 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 22 Street Funds This section provides a financial overview of the City’s three street funds for the period ending December 30, 2021. The City’s street funds are the Arterial Street Fund (Fund 102), the Local Street Fund (Fund 103), and the Arterial Street Preservation Fund (Fund 105). Fund 102 – Arterial Street Fund The Arterial Street Fund is a special revenue fund that is funded by transportation grants, traffic impact fees, a portion of the City’s gas tax receipts, Public Works Trust Fund loans, developer contributions, and other sources. As of December 31, 2021 there were 20 separate street projects budgeted in this fund. Revenues collected in 2021 totaled $3.5 million as compared to 2020collections of $2.6 million. Total expenditures in 2021 were $3.7 million compared to $3.1 million last year. Variances in revenues and expenditures are largely due to the timing of capital expenditures and any subsequent reimbursement via grants and/or operating transfers. Expenditure timing is generally determined by the current phase of each individual capital project; expenditures tend to increase as projects move from design phase into construction. Fund 102 - Arterial Street 2020 Summary of Sources and Uses 2021 2021 YE 2021 YE 2020 YE Report Period: December 2021 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues Federal Grants 3,713,508$ 3,713,508$ 1,170,024$ 292,049$ (2,543,484)$ (68.5)% State And Local Grants 419,980 419,980 34,417 30,020 (385,563) (91.8)% Motor Vehicle Fuel and Multimodal Taxes 620,000 620,000 641,460 111,399 21,460 3.5 % Miscellaneous Revenue 700,000 700,000 982,046 194,065 282,046 40.3 % Operating Transfer In 3,296,915 3,296,915 688,073 1,953,492 (2,608,842) (79.1)% Investment Income 6,200 6,200 1,302 7,660 (4,898) (79.0)% Total Revenues 8,756,603$ 8,756,603$ 3,517,323$ 2,588,685$ (5,239,280)$ (59.8)% Expenditures Salary and Benefits 350,000$ 350,000$ 549,996$ 531,846$ (199,996)$ (57.1)% Capital Outlay 9,577,598 9,577,598 2,775,327 2,083,399 6,802,271 71.0 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 9,927,598 9,927,598 3,325,323 2,615,245 6,602,275 66.5 % Services and Charges 280,000 280,000 129,884 173,854 150,116 53.6 % Interfund Payments for Services 69,050 69,050 69,050 80,100 (0) (0.0)% Debt Service Principal and Interest 206,900 206,900 206,733 207,428 167 0.1 % Operating Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 10,483,548$ 10,483,548$ 3,730,990$ 3,076,626$ 6,752,558$ 64.4 % Net Change in Fund Balance (1,726,945)$ (1,726,945)$ (213,667)$ (487,941)$ 1,513,278$ 87.6 % Beg. Fund Balance, January 2021 2,284,075$ Net Change in Fund Balance, December 2021 (213,667) Ending Fund Balance, December 2021 2,070,408$ 2021 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 557,130$ 2021 2021 YE Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage Page 29 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 23 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2021 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Name 2021 Budget YE Actual Remaining AWS Improvements - Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE $2.1M $0.2M $1.9M F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements $1.4M $1.1M $0.3M Signal Replacement at Auburn Way N. and 1st St. NE $1.1M $0.4M $0.7M All Other Projects (17 Others Budgeted)$5.4M $1.6M $3.7M Total $9.9M $3.3M $6.6M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Fund 102 - Arterial Street Capital Projects Status * Page 30 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 24 Fund 103 – Local Street Fund The Local Street Fund is a special revenue fund used for local street repair. The fund is currently funded by interfund transfers on a project-reimbursement basis; in 2019 and 2020, it was funded at a specific annual amount by real estate excise tax (REET 2). Expenditures through December 2021 were $1.5 million as compared to expenditures of $1.2 million through the fourth quarter of 2020. Highlighted in the table below and shown in the following graph are the fund’s total expenditures related to capital projects. Fund 103 - Local Street Fund 2020 Summary of Sources and Uses 2021 2021 YE 2021 YE 2020 YE Report Period: December 2021 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues Operating Transfer In 2,350,000 2,350,000 1,539,177$ 1,900,000 (810,823) (34.5)% Interest Earnings 10,600 10,600 3,341$ 10,301 (7,259) (68.5)% Total Revenues 2,360,600$ 2,360,600$ 1,542,518$ 1,910,301$ (818,082)$ (34.7)% Expenditures Capital Salary and Benefits 235,000 235,000 99,955 120,657 135,045 57.5 % Capital Outlay 3,372,269 3,372,269 1,361,612 1,016,935 2,010,657 59.6 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 3,607,269 3,607,269 1,461,568 1,137,592 2,145,701 59.5 % Admin Salary and Benefits - - - 19,745 -$ Admin Services and Charges 700 700 - 361 700 100.0 % Interfund Payments for Services 13,250 13,250 13,250 15,600 (0) (0.0)% Total Expenditures 3,621,219$ 3,621,219$ 1,474,818$ 1,173,297$ 2,146,401$ 59.3 % Net Change in Fund Balance (1,260,619)$ (1,260,619)$ 67,700$ 737,004$ 1,328,319$ 105.4 % Beg. Fund Balance, January 2021 3,288,572$ Net Change in Fund Balance, December 2021 67,700 Ending Fund Balance, December 2021 3,356,273$ 2021 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 2,027,953$ 2021 2021 YE Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage Page 31 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 25 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2021 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Name 2021 Budget YE Actual Remaining 2021 Local Street Preservation $2.5M $1.4M $1.2M Lead Service Line Replacement $0.8M $0.1M $0.7M 2022 Local Street Preservation $0.2M $0.0M $0.1M All Other Projects (2 Others Budgeted)$0.1M $0.0M $0.1M Total $3.6M $1.5M $2.1M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Fund 103 - Local Street Capital Projects Status* Page 32 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 26 Fund 105 – Arterial Street Preservation Fund The Arterial Street Preservation Fund is a special revenue fund that is primarily funded by a 1.0% utility tax that was adopted by Council in 2008; these utility tax revenues are restricted for arterial street repair and preservation projects. In 2020, due to COVID-19 impacts, the funding source was transfers-in of REET 2 revenues while the 1.0% utility tax was retained in the General Fund. Major projects budgeted within the Arterial Street Preservation Fund in 2021 include 4th Street SE Preservation, Lakeland Hills Way Preservation, and AWN Preservation Phase 2 (8th Street SE to 22nd). Through December 2021, revenues totaled $3.5 million, which is significantly higher than the same period in 2020. This is primarily due to the change in funding source, which resulted in artificially low revenues in the fund. Revenues and expenditures also fluctuate due to the timing associated with construction projects and their subsequent cost reimbursements from grants and transfers-in. Expenditures through December 2021 totaled $4.0 million as compared to $2.3 million through December 2020. Historically, the majority of this fund’s expenditures occur in the second half of each year due to the weather sensitivity of pavement construction (this work needs to be done primarily in the summer and early fall). Highlighted in the table below and shown in the following graph are the fund’s total expenditures related to capital projects. Fund 105 - Arterial Street Preservation 2020 Summary of Sources and Uses 2021 2021 YE 2021 YE 2020 YE Report Period: December 2021 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues City Utility Tax 725,100$ 725,100$ 708,045$ 0$ (17,055)$ (2.4)% Electric Utility Tax 744,600 744,600 758,059 0 13,459 1.8 % Natural Gas Utility Tax 223,400 223,400 216,550 - (6,850) (3.1)% Cable TV Tax 175,400 175,400 192,511 (0) 17,111 9.8 % Telephone Utility Tax 153,100 153,100 135,985 0 (17,115) (11.2)% Garbage Utility Tax (External Haulers)18,800 18,800 32,789 - 13,989 74.4 % Grants 5,016,622 5,016,622 1,032,754 741,557 (3,983,868) (79.4)% Operating Transfer In 437,946 437,946 437,946 2,142,224 - 0.0 % Interest Earnings 12,400 12,400 2,742 7,297 (9,658) (77.9)% Total Revenues 7,507,368$ 7,507,368$ 3,517,380$ 2,891,078$ (3,989,988)$ (53.1)% Expenditures Salary and Benefits 188,000$ 188,000$ 481,007$ 546,715$ (293,007)$ (155.9)% Capital Outlay 9,143,141 9,143,141 3,393,360 1,734,348 5,749,781 62.9 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 9,331,141 9,331,141 3,874,368 2,281,063 5,456,773 58.5 % Supplies - - - - - Services and Charges 51,000 51,000 22,365 985 28,635 56.1 Operating Transfer Out 68,500 68,500 68,500 - - 0.0 Total Expenditures 9,450,641$ 9,450,641$ 3,965,233$ 2,282,047$ 5,485,408$ 58.0 % Net Change in Fund Balance (1,943,273)$ (1,943,273)$ (447,853)$ 609,031$ 1,495,420$ 77.0 % Beg. Fund Balance, January 2021 3,385,926$ Net Change in Fund Balance, December 2021 (447,853) Ending Fund Balance, December 2021 2,938,073$ 2021 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 1,442,653$ 2021 2021 YE Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage Page 33 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 27 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2021 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Fund 105 - Arterial Street Preservation Capital Projects Status* Name 2021 Budget YE Actual Remaining 4th Street SE Preservation $1.9M $0.2M $1.7M Lakeland Hills Way Preservation $1.5M $1.3M $0.2M AWN Preservation Phase 2 - 8th St SE to 22nd $1.4M $0.6M $0.8M All Other Projects (11 Others Budgeted) $4.5M $1.7M $2.8M Total $9.3M $3.9M $5.5M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Page 34 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 28 Fund 124 – Mitigation Fees The Mitigation Fees Fund is a special revenue fund funded from revenues from fees for new development that are assessed at the time applications are received for development activity. These revenues are used to address costs associated with City growth. The fund houses two types of revenues: mitigation fees and impact fees. Mitigation fees are variable charges collected as a result of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) reviews and the City’s determination that a project must pay additional fees to compensate for a unique effect that it has on the community. Impact fees are set charges collected automatically for a variety of projects. These fees are adopted annually by the City Council based on projects anticipated in the Capital Facilities Plan over the next six years. In 2021, the City received $2.9 million in mitigation and impact revenues, largely driven by commercial transportation impact fees paid for by two large warehouses. As a result, revenues exceeded budget, while expenditures were significantly below budget due to the timing of multiple capital projects funded by mitigation and/or impact fee revenues. Fund 124 - Mitigation Fees Summary of Sources and Uses Report Period Through:Ending Ending December 2021 Fund Balance Fund Balance Transportation Impact Fees 818,000$ 3,037,315$ 5,565,242$ 2,422,971$ 628,473$ 9,579,055$ Traffic Migitation Fees - 100,000 37,806 - - 137,806 Fire Impact Fees 148,300 550,000 178,530 122,193 550,000 152,423 Fire Mitigation Fees - - 81 - - 81 Parks Impact Fees 158,500 3,970,422 1,726,858 322,000 285,974 5,574,806 Parks Mitigation Fees - - 186,352 - - 186,352 School Impact Admin Fees 5,600 - 94,816 5,876 - 95,092 Wetland Mitigation Fees - 36,600 36,272 - - 72,872 Interest and Investment Income 87,160 - 87,160 14,945 - 14,945 Fees in Lieu of Improvements - - 27,128 - - 27,128 Permit Processing Fees - 44,200 (44,200) - - - Total 1,217,560$ 7,738,537$ 7,896,045$ 2,887,985$ 1,464,447$ 15,840,560$ Beginning Fund Balance, January 2021 14,417,022$ Net Change in Fund Balance, December 2021 1,423,538 Estimated Ending Fund Balance, December 2021 15,840,560$ 2021 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 7,896,045$ BUDGET YE Actuals Revenues Expenditures Revenues Expenditures Page 35 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 29 Enterprise Funds Detailed income and expense statements for Enterprise and Internal Service funds can be found in an attachment at the end of this report. The attachment provides operating and – as applicable – capital fund reports for these funds showing budget, actuals, and variances. Operating funds house all the operating costs along with debt service and financing obligations. Capital funds show costs associated with capital acquisition and construction. Both the operating and capital funds have a working capital balance. This approach isolates those funds available for capital and cash flow needs for daily operations, and project managers will know exactly how much working capital is available for current and planned projects. Through December 2021 the Water Utility had operating income of $4.9 million (operating revenues less operating expenditures), approximately $541,000 below the same period last year. Water Fund operating revenues were $801,000 or 6.6% higher than 2020; the majority of this variance was due to stronger performance in water sales revenue, which was offset by lower interest and other earnings. Operating expenditures increased by $1.3 million mainly due to an increase of the City utility interfund tax rate from 7% to 10%, increased debt service payments, higher personnel costs, and increased interfund service charges. Billable water consumption through December 2021 totaled 3.0 million hundred cubic feet (ccf), an increase of 95,000 ccf (3.3%) over last year. With the exception of manufacturing and wholesale, all customer classes saw an increase in consumption compared to last year. There is also a trend of decreased year-over-year consumption on a per account basis due largely to conservation efforts and appliance efficiency improvements, which are anticipated in the Utilities Comprehensive Plan. Page 36 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 30 Through December 2021, the Sewer Utility finished with operating income of $1.1 million as compared to $1.9 million through December 2020. Operating revenues were up $362,000 or 4.2% from last year due to stronger performance in charges for City sewer service. Operating expenses were up $1.1 million due to an increase in the City interfund utility tax rate, as well as increased personnel and interfund service costs. Year-to-date billable consumption by volume was up 85,000 ccf, or 5.6% from 2020 due to increases in commercial consumption, which was previously impacted by severe COVID-19 mitigation efforts that have been relaxed (but not eliminated) in 2021. Through December 2021, the Stormwater Utility had operating income of $2.3 million compared with $3.3 million in the same last year. Operating revenues were up $178,000 compared to 2020 due to charges for City storm service. As most Stormwater Utility charges are based on a flat rate, COVID-19 did not have a significant effect on service revenue. Operating expenditures in the Stormwater Utility were up $1.1 million compared to 2020. This increase was mainly due to the interfund the utility tax rate increase, as well as increased personnel costs, fleet and support charges. Prior to October 2021, the City of Auburn’s Solid Waste Utility services had been outsourced to Waste Management and to Republic Services, who managed the contract for the annexed areas. Beginning in October 2021, all of the City’s solid waste services are handled by Waste Management based on a newly-signed contract. Through December 2021, the Solid Waste Utility Fund experienced an operating loss of $2.4 million. In 2020, both revenues and expenditures were low compared to prior years, with 2021 returning to expected levels of service. Operating revenues have increased by $515,000 compared to last year, while operating expenditures have increased by $2.8 million. The majority of the revenue increase is attributable to a higher volume of services provided compared to the previous year. Expenditures increased due to higher payments to the City’s solid waste vendor following implementation of the new contract, as well as the increased interfund utility tax rate. The current mix of solid waste customer account types (rounded) is:  90.7% Residential  7.6% Commercial  1.7% Multifamily The “diversion rate” is a measure of how much generated waste is not sent to the landfill; i.e., waste that is either recycled or collected yard waste. Through December 2021, the total diversion rate was 27.4%, which represents a total of 19,100 tons of waste that was diverted from landfills. Page 37 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 31 2021 Tons Collected and Diversion Rates Of the total tonnage collected through December 2021, 34% was from residential customers, 15% from multifamily customers, and 51% from commercial customers, as shown below: Page 38 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 32 Through December 2021, the Airport Fund had operating income of $347,000 as compared with operating income of $604,000 in 2020. Operating revenues in the Airport Fund were $85,000 more than last year due to increased revenues from aviation fuel sales and property leases. Operating expenditures in the Airport Fund were $343,000 more than the same period of last year. Much of this variance consisted of fuel inventory expenses, but also included increased personnel costs, repairs and maintenance, and fleet costs. In 2021, the Cemetery Fund realized net operating income of $597,000 as compared with operating income of $228,000 in 2020. Total sales revenues were up $443,000, or 28.7%, from 2020 due to significant increases in lot sales, markers, and openings and closings. Operating expenditures were up $72,000 or 5.5% from last year due mostly to inventory and grounds maintenance purchases, as well as increased personnel costs. Internal Service Funds Operating expenditures within the Insurance Fund represent the premium cost pool that will be allocated monthly to other City funds over the course of the year. As a result, the expenditure balance gradually diminishes each month throughout the year. No significant variances are reported in the Workers’ Compensation, Facilities, Innovation & Technology, or Equipment Rental Funds. Page 39 of 88 Quarterly Financial Report Through December 2021 33 Contact Information This report is prepared by the Finance Department. Additional financial information can also be viewed at our website: http://www.auburnwa.gov/. For any questions about this report please contact Jamie Thomas at jdthomas@auburnwa.gov. Page 40 of 88 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6856 (Caillier) (10 Minutes) Date: March 23, 2022 Department: Police Attachments: Ordinance No. 6856 Exhibit A, Ordinance No. 6856 Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Discussion only Background for Motion: This ordinance will update Auburn City Code to correct outdated language and RCW references pertaining to vehicle parking for persons with disabilities. This ordinance will ensure that any issued citations and/or resulting vehicle impounds are based on solid legal authority. Background Summary: This ordinance updates language to be consistent with RCW in defining valid permits, with specific reference to the applicable RCW. It also adds clarity on blocking access aisles, crosshatched areas, and required distance from wheel chair ramps. The ordinance adds further clarity to when impounds for violations would be authorized and references the specific governing RCW. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Jeyaraj Staff:Chief Caillier Meeting Date:March 28, 2022 Item Number: Page 41 of 88 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6856 March 23, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2019 ORDINANCE NO. 6856 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 10.36.268 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATED TO VEHICLE PARKING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WHEREAS, section 10.36.268 of the Auburn City Code (ACC) sets forth regulations and restrictions on vehicle parking for persons with disabilities, and in doing so adopts portions of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) by reference; WHEREAS, since the City last updated ACC 10.36.268, its adopted RCW provisions have moved to elsewhere in the State code, leaving ACC 10.36.268 with incorrect State law references; WHEREAS, ACC 10.36.268 is otherwise in need of revision to update its language for precision and clarity. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. Section 10.36.268 of the Auburn City Code is amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person or circumstance, will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Page 42 of 88 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6856 March 23, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2019 Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Kendra Comeau, City Attorney Published: ____________________ Page 43 of 88 EXHIBIT A—ORDINANCE NO. 6856 ACC 10.36.268 Disabled pParking for persons with disabilities – Violations, penalties. A. Parking spaces indicated for persons with disabilities. A parking space or stall for a person with disabilities physically disabled person shall be indicated by a vertical sign placed , between 48 and 60 inches from the off the ground. The sign shall display , with the RCW 70.92.120 international symbol of access described under RCW 70.92.120 displaying the notice “State disabled parking permit required” and include language indicating that a warning that other vehicles parked in the space or stall without a license plate, placard or card described in this section may be impounded.permits are subject to impound. B. Parking for vehicles transporting persons with disabilities; exception. 1. Vehicles transporting Any persons meeting the RCW 46.19 who meets the criteria for special parking privileges under Chapter 46.16 RCW shall be are allowed without free of charge to park a vehicle being used to transport that person in otherwise time- restricted parking zones or areas that are otherwise restricted as to the length of time parking is permitted. To be eligible for this parking privilege, Tthe vehicle person mustshall obtain and display the license plate, placard or card as described in RCW 46.19. a special card, decal, or license plate under Chapter 46.16 RCW to be eligible for the privileges set forth in this section. The display card must be hung from the rearview mirror and be visible through the windshield, or placed in a clearly visible location, face up on the dashboard. 2. This subsection B does not apply to parking those zones or areas that prohibit all vehicles from in which the stopping, parking or standing, of all vehicles is prohibited or that restrict parking to which are reserved for special vehicle types of vehicles. The person shall obtain and display a special card, decal, or license plate under Chapter 46.16 RCW to be eligible for the privileges set forth in this section. The display card must be hung from the rearview mirror and be visible through the windshield, or placed in a clearly visible location, face up on the dashboard. C. Violations. 1. Improper parking in a space or stall indicated for persons with disabilities. No person may shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in a properly posted and marked parking space or stall indicated for a person with disabilitiesphysically disabled person as provided in subsection A of this section for any purpose or length of time unless the such vehicle displays the license plate, placard or card as described in RCW 46.19. a special license Page 44 of 88 plate, card or decal indicating that the vehicle is being used to transport a disabled person as defined under Chapter 46.16 RCW. 2D. Vehicles blocking access aisles for persons with disabilities. No person may shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle to block or make inaccessible in any access aisle or crosshatched area immediately adjacent to a properly posted and marked parking space or stall indicated for a person with disabilitiesphysically disabled person as provided in subsection A of this section. 3.F. Vehicle parking within 20 feet of wheelchair ramps. No person may shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in front of or within 20 feet of a wheelchair ramp on a public street unless lawfully parking in a space or stall indicated for persons with disabilities. , except for marked, disabled parking stalls. D. Penalties. 1. Infraction. Any violation of this section is an infraction with a maximum penalty of $300.00. 2. Vehicle impound. E. The chief of police or designee may impound any vehicle: a. parked in violation of subsection C.1 of this section, whether the space or stall is on public property or on private property without charge; or b. parked upon a public right of way or other publicly owned or controlled property in violation of any other provision of this section. The redemption of an impounded vehicle shall be governed by RCW 46.55 and other applicable law. A vehicle may be impounded with a parking citation to its owner when a vehicle without a special license plate, card, or decal indicating that the vehicle is being used to transport a disabled person as defined under Chapter 46.16 RCW is parked in a stall or space clearly and conspicuously marked therefor whether the space is provided on private property without charge or on public property, as signed and marked as set forth in subsection A of this section. The issuance of a previous parking citation to said vehicle for violation of the terms of this section shall constitute said prior notice. F. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in front of or within 20 feet of a wheelchair ramp on a public street, except for marked, disabled parking stalls. G. Any violation of this section shall be an infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of $300.00. Page 45 of 88 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Police Annual Reports (Caillier) (30 Minutes) Date: March 23, 2022 Department: Police Attachments: 2021 Annual Use of Force Review 2021 Annual CIA Review Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrative Recommendation: No recommended action items. Background for Motion: No motions for consideration. Background Summary: Presentation of two Police Annual Reports; 2021 Annual Use of Force Review and 2021 Annual CIA Review. Open for question and answer dialog following each presentation. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Jeyaraj Staff:Chief Caillier Meeting Date:March 28, 2022 Item Number: Page 46 of 88 AUBURNVALUESSERVICEENVIRONMENTECONOMYCHARACTERSUSTAINABILITYWELLNESSCELEBRATIONAuburn Police Department 2021ANNUAL USE OF FORCE REVIEWPage 47 of 88 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENTAUBURNVALUESSERVICEENVIRONMENTECONOMYCHARACTERSUSTAINABILITYWELLNESSCELEBRATIONDAVE COLGLAZIERINSPECTIONAL SERVICES COMMANDERDCOLGLAZIER@AUBURNWA.GOV253-804-3125Page 48 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONUSE OF FORCE REVIEWThe purpose of this annual report is to document and summarize all Uses of Force that werecompleted by Auburn Officers during the 2021 calendar year. This report compares statistics fromprevious years through 2021, which adds context and helps us identify trends that we can addressin future training. The report will compare Use of Force incidents vs. Use of Force Allegations;types of injuries sustained by both suspect and officer; and force used when presented with differentscenarios (i.e. officer about to be assaulted, suspect fled, etc.). In 2021, Auburn Police Officers responded to 72,944 CAD incidents (73,998 in 2020) and completed15,295 case reports (15,299 in 2020). Officers made 2990 arrests (3,629 in 2020) with 1067 ofthose arrestees being booked into SCORE (1,652 in 2020), and issued 3,820 infractions/citations(8,110 in 2020). There were 83 incidents where officers were required to use force. Of the 83 incidents there were130 Use of Force reports completed by officers in 2021 compared to 231 in 2020. Force reportsexceed incidents because at times multiple officers used force on one suspect. Of the 83 incidents,there were 45 reported injuries by the suspect. All injuries were photographed and noted and mostwere minor scrapes, bruises, small lacerations, K-9 contacts, and complaints of pain with no visibleinjury. Page 49 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONIt is important to understand that there are times when it takes two or more officers using force onone suspect in order to gain compliance and get the suspect in custody. When that occurs eachofficer is required to complete a force report which then generates multiple force reports for oneincident. Table #1 below depicts the ratios in comparison to the force incidents. CONTACTS VS USE OF FORCE INCIDENTSOnly .11 of subjects contacted resulted in force being used. Table 12020 2020 Ratio(179)2021 2021 Ratio(83)CAD73,998 1/413 (.24%) 72,944 1/879 (.11%)Cases15,299 1/85 (1.2%) 15,295 1/184 (.54%)Arrests3,629 1/20 (5%) 2,990 1/36 (2.78%)Bookings1,652 1/9 (11%) 1,067 1/13 (7.78%)The above table effectively shows that our officers use de-escalation techniques well. Asyou can see only 83 subjects out of 72,944 who were contacted, compelled the officer to useforce. Page 50 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONTable #2 below shows the ratio comparison from 2020 regarding force reports completed. Only .18% of contacts resulted in a use of force report being completed. CONTACTS VS USE OF FORCE INCIDENTSTable 22020 2020 Ratio(231)2021 2021 Ratio(130)CAD73,998 1/320 (.31%) 72,944 1/561(.18%)Cases15,299 1/66 (1.5%) 15,295 1/118 (.85%)Arrests3,629 1/16 (6.3%) 2,990 1/23 (4.3%)Bookings1,652 1/7 (14%) 1,067 1/8 (12%)Page 51 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONForce Report Comparison 2018-2021 In 2021, we received 3 allegations of inappropriate and/or excessive applications of force. Allincidents were investigated and 2 were determined to have no misconduct and were within policy.Table #3 shows there were 3 incidents that resulted in allegations of excessive force. Table #4 thenreflects these same numbers in a percentage of allegations which is 2.3 % in 2021. FORCE COMPLAINTSYear Use of force reportsExcessive Force AllegationsSustained Allegations2018252 2 02019214 3 02020231 7 22021130 3 10%1%2%3%2018 2019 2020 20211%1.4%3%2.3%% Total force Resulting in Complaints2018‐2021Page 52 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe use of force types listed below are techniques that the officers are trained to use depending onthe type of resistance the subjects are exhibiting. Take Down is the most used type of force ourofficers use which is also the least invasive type of force. VNR is Vascular Neck Restraint which isnot considered a “choke hold” and was widely used across the country. VNR is used often in somesporting events such as many martial arts types events. VNR has been a very successful and usefultool for our officers in the past reducing the need for officers to escalate the force incident. In themiddle of 2020 the VNR policy was paused and currently can only be used under lethal forceconsiderations. PIT is Pursuit Immobilization Technique which is used during pursuits in an attemptto end the pursuit as quickly as possible in order to reduce potential injury and take the suspect intocustody. An Intentional Vehicle Strike is authorized by policy in certain situations which entailsthe officer striking a suspect vehicle with his/her patrol car at slow speed in order to pin the vehicleso that it cannot continue to flee. FORCE TYPESPage 53 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONForce Types Used in 2021 Table #5 below shows each force type that can be used by an officer, and shows the number of times that particular type of force was used in 2021. FORCE TYPES CONT. Page 54 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONEFFECTIVE VS NOT EFFECTIVE051015202530354045EffectiveNot EffectivePage 55 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONForce Used Resulting in Injuries In 2021, injuries were reported by the suspect in 49% of all uses of force. Officers received minorinjuries in 15% of the incidents. Injuries to suspects can include abrasions, contact from K9’s, orgeneral complaints of pain. All complaints of injuries are required to be documented andphotographed. Officer injuries included bruising, minor punctures, scrapes and scratches. Table#7 and #8 compare these numbers to previous years. FORCE RESULTING IN INJURYTotal Force Reports Suspects Injured Officers Injured % of total of suspects injured2018252 87 35 35%2019214 84 31 39%2020231 88 35 38%2021130 63 19 48%Table 7Page 56 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONFORCE RESULTING IN INJURY CONT. 3212779754110694029912300190550020406080100120140Taser Probe Pain Complaint K‐9 Cut/Bruise/Scrape Broken bone/ToothSuspect Injury By Type 2018‐20212018201920202021Page 57 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONTime of Day The below tables depict the Auburn Police Departments use of force incidents by time of day. As inprevious years documented, the majority of the occasions that officers are compelled to use forceoccur between the hours of 8:00 PM and 2:00 AM. This year also showed an increase in the latemorning between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM. Table #9 focuses on the year 2021 only and Table #10compares the times to previous years. TIME OF DAY02468101214160600070008000900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400010002000300040005002021 Incidents By Time of DayPage 58 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONTIME OF DAY CONT.05214674831458117111410764360347713411381113141418122018128131127422641015867141161114211919 371410321575448131011 3116117121517229111073104988431561036151071523231514778102391392335551487714669422020406080100120Force Incidents by Time of Day2016-2021202120202019201820172016Page 59 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATION Reason for Use of Force Table #11 below shows the reasons that an officer(s) were compelled to begin to use force resulting in the 130 force reports. REASON FOR FORCEOfficer AssaultedOfficer About to be AssaultedOther About to be AssaultedSubject With WeaponAttempting to EscapeRefusing Commands Other201718 17 6 5 80 71 17201813 28 8 2 112 76 11201916 26 4 2 77 76 13202023 21 4 3 92 78 10202191058434410Page 60 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONTable #12 below shows the different resistance citizens were giving to an officer during a use of force encounter. Most of the time there are multiple types of resistance provided by a subject during a force encounter. In 2021, there were 376 documented forms of resistance during force encounters. RESISTANCE DURING FORCE ENCOUNTEROfficer Assaulted/Threat to be AssaultedFighting StanceOther About to be AssaultedMuscular Tension/Pulled AwaySubject Trying to FleeRefusing Commands Other201752 16 14 219 82 162 37201847 27 14 247 117 170 31201948 27 10 268 66 183 21202049 31 10 274 75 173 40202135 23 7 135 44 95 37Page 61 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONOfficer Assessment of Citizen Prior to Force Being Used The below table is what the officer was observing or perceiving of the citizen prior to being compelled to use force. OFFICER ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO FORCE01020304050607080Agitated Alcohol or Drugs Angry Calm Enraged Mental Disorder Out of Control7462171411723635725241892845308159914Officer Assessment201920202021Page 62 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONUSE OF FORCE DEMOGRAPHICSPage 63 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSUMMARYIt is clear from the review that Auburn Officers contact many subjects throughout the year and makemany arrests. New police legislation throughout 2021 significantly impacted/limited circumstancesin which officers were allowed to contact and detain suspects. Subsequently, force incidentscontinue to be low compared to the amount of contacts our officers make each year. VNR was notused in 2021 as a type of force our officers can use except in a deadly force encounter. This maybe one reason why officer “Take Downs” remain the highest category for type of force. The most compelling statistics in this review are that the calls for service, arrests, and bookings arehigh numbers and by percentage the use of force does not occur often. In 2021, only .11% of CADincidents required force to be used on a subject. Officers continue to receive annual defensivetactics/use of force training, as well as training on de-escalation techniques. This trainingencompasses classroom, hands-on, and scenario based training. Each Officer has completed the40 hour Crisis Intervention Training as well as completing yearly refresher training as required. At the start of 2021 we created a Use of Force Committee which is comprised of Commanders andSergeants who are highly trained in police use of force encounters. We also are now part of theDepartment of Justice FBI Use of Force database. Uses of force that result in serious bodily injury(as defined by the Department of Justice) or death will be reported in the FBI database. Any use offorce that results in great bodily harm (as defined by the Revised Code of Washington), death, orappears to be out of policy, will be reviewed by the Use of Force Committee who will then providea report to the chief. The goal of the Force Committee is to provide a more detailed analysis,focusing more case by case, than is already done and to analyze force trends in order to enhancetraining, reduce injuries and ensure our citizens remain protected. Page 64 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONAs we move into 2022, body worn cameras will be fully implemented by April 1st. Departmental policy has been updated regarding their usage, and they will be an additional resource in the documentation of force incidents.SUMMARY CONT.Page 65 of 88 AUBURNVALUESSERVICEENVIRONMENTECONOMYCHARACTERSUSTAINABILITYWELLNESSCELEBRATIONAuburn Police Department AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT2021ANNUAL CIA REVIEWPage 66 of 88 AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENTAUBURNVALUESSERVICEENVIRONMENTECONOMYCHARACTERSUSTAINABILITYWELLNESSCELEBRATIONDAVE COLGLAZIERINSPECTIONAL SERVICES COMMANDERDCOLGLAZIER@AUBURNWA.GOV253-804-3125Page 67 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONANNUAL CIA REVIEWThis annual analysis of the CIA (Commendations, Inquiries, and Allegations)investigations provides the administration of the agency and the public we serve areview of agency personnel conduct from an analytical perspective and possibly throughthe eyes of our community. As outlined in the Auburn Police Department Manual ofStandards, the CIA system provides a standardized means of reporting, investigating,and documenting Commendations, Inquiries, Internal Investigations and CollisionReviews. Our Vision Statement calls for us to be a premier agency that is trusted, supported,and respected. Our Mission Statement requires that our department will “provideprofessional Law Enforcement services to our community.” To meet these demands,we must be a disciplined and a well-regulated organization. One method by which todetermine our success is to evaluate our CIA process. This report illustrates how wellthe Auburn Police Department is perceived to be following our Vision and Missionstatements, as well as our Manual of Standards. Summary of 2021 In 2021, Auburn Police Officers responded to 72,944 CAD incidents (73,998 in 2020)and completed 15,295 case reports (15,299 in 2020). Officers made 2,990 arrests(3,629 in 2020) with 1,067 of those arrestees being booked into SCORE (1,652 in 2020),and issued 3,820 infractions/citations (8,110 in 2020). All of this activity accounts foronly a portion of the personal contacts with our community members that are made byour police officers throughout the year. Page 68 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONA Commendation is used to recognize actions or performance by members of thepolice department who act or perform in a manner that is outstanding or beyond whatis normally expected. The Commendation process recognizes employees forProfessionalism, Exemplary Job, Exemplary Actions, Life Saving and Heroism. The majority of our commendations come from citizens who took the time to recognizeone or more officers due to their exemplary and professional work. Thesecommendations range from officers conducting school speeches, helping someonechange a tire or going above and beyond to investigate someone’s case. COMMENDATIONSPage 69 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe Medal of Valor will be awarded to department personnel for acts that meet all ofthe following conditions. 1. When the act conspicuously displays extreme courage, beyond the normaldemands for police service. 2. When failure to take such action would not justify official censure. 3. When substantial risk to their physical safety actually existed and the individualwas unquestionably conscious of this imminent threat. 4. When the objective was logically believed to be of sufficient importance tojustify the risk taken. MEDAL OF VALORPage 70 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe Medal of Distinction will be awarded to department personnel for acts which meetall of the following criteria. 1. When personnel manifest courage in the performance of duty undercircumstances less than those required for the Medal of Valor. 2. When a risk to the individual’s physical safety actually existed, or when therewas reason to believe that such a risk was present. 3. When the act indicated that the individual was conscious of the imminentdanger to their personal safety, or when a reasonable and prudent person wouldnormally assume such a danger was present. 4. When the objective was reasonably believed to be of sufficient importance tojustify the risk taken. 5. When the individual accomplished the objective, or was prevented from doingso by circumstances beyond his/her control. MEDAL OF DISTINCTIONPage 71 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe Lifesaving Medal shall be awarded to department personnel for acts that meet allof the following criteria. 1. When the acts were personally performed by the officer. 2. When affirmed by competent medical authority, an individual saved a humanlife or prolonged life beyond the day of extraordinary circumstances. LIFESAVING MEDALPage 72 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe Merit Medal shall be awarded to department personnel for acts that meet all of thefollowing criteria. 1. When individuals who distinguish themselves by excellence in events whichinvolve tactical action. 2. When the event involves some risk to the individual. MERIT MEDALPage 73 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe Honorable Tactical De-escalation Medal shall be awarded to department personnel for acts that meet all of the following criteria.1. When the acts were personally performed by the department member.2. When the department member utilized exceptional tactical skills or verbal approaches and techniques to de-escalate any deadly force situation resulting in the saving or sustaining of a human life.3. When the deadly force and de-escalation factors can be independently verified.HONORABLE TACTICAL DE-ESCALATION MEDALPage 74 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONYearTotal CommendationsLetter of CommendationMedal of DistinctionLife Saving Medal of Valor Medal of MeritTactical Medal201871 1 0 7 1 0 0201993 7 0 11 0 402020167 16 3 10 0 002021124 2 0 7 2 21COMMENDATIONS Page 75 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThere are two ways a complaint can be categorized and investigated: SupervisoryInvestigation and Internal Investigation. A Supervisory Investigation involves a complaint made regarding the quality ofservice delivery. These complaints vary in degree from complaints regarding anemployee’s demeanor, tardiness, complaints related to customer service, or the natureof a department practice. This may also be a complaint of a minor policy violation. Theemployee’s immediate supervisor typically handles this type of complaint, but acommander might also take charge of it. An Internal Investigation involves a complaint of a possible violation of departmentstandards, written directives, City policies or applicable Civil Service Rules. Theseallegations include, but are not limited to, complaints of bias based policing, excessiveforce, alleged corruption, insubordination, breach of civil rights, false arrest, and othertypes of allegations of serious misconduct. In the event that an allegation of criminalmisconduct is reported and appears to have merit, a simultaneous criminalinvestigation will be initiated. EMPLOYEE INVESTIGATIONSPage 76 of 88 Page 77 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONYear CAD Incidents Internal Investigations Inv. With Misconduct Total Employees Emp. With Misconduct201896,884 7 (.007%) 6 9 7201986,062 18 (.02%) 11 17 13202073,998 9 (.01%) 6 9 6202172,944 6 (.008%) 5 7 5INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONSPage 78 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONExternal Sources Internal Sources Total CombinedTotal Investigations42 6Sustained Misconduct32 5INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONSInternal Investigations generated by internal and external sources In examining the above tables, Internal Investigations generated internally usually resulted in a finding of actual misconduct. The above table shows that both of the Investigations received from internal sources resulted in a finding of misconduct. During these types of investigations, statements, photographs, videos, police reports, and any other potential documentation are examined. The investigation is then forwarded to a supervisory review board to determine findings.Page 79 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSupervisory Investigations SUPERVISORY INVESTIGATIONSThese numbers continue to be very low compared to the amount of contacts with thepublic. This would appear to indicate that our officers conduct themselves most of thetime in a professional manner due to the fact that inquiries are complaints regarding anofficer’s demeanor, tardiness, and customer service. (These were labeled asSupervisory Inquiries prior to 2021) Year CAD IncidentsSupervisory Inv/ InquiriesInquiries with Unacceptable PerformanceInvolved EmployeesEmployees with Unacceptable Performance201896,884 20 (.02%) 10 20 12201986,062 11 (.01%) 7 12 6202073,998 21 (.03%) 12 21 11202172,944 10 (.01) 2 14 2Page 80 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe following table depicts the total combined allegations by category for all Supervisor Investigations and Internal Investigations for 2021. It should be noted that Supervisor Investigations can result in findings of Acceptable Performance or Unacceptable Performance, and Internal Investigations can result in findings of Misconduct or No Misconduct, among others. ALLEGATIONSAllegation TotalNo Misconduct/Acceptable PerformanceMisconduct/Unacceptable performanceNo Conclusion/PendingViolation of General Policy43 1 0Discourtesy66 0 0Code of Conduct64 2 0False Arrest33 0 0Excessive Force32 1 0ACCESS Violation10 1 0Conduct Unbecoming10 1 0Core Values10 1 0Fail to Meet Job Expectations10 1 0Foot Pursuit Policy10 1 0Vehicle Pursuit Policy10 1 0Totals28 18 10 0Page 81 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONIn 2021, there were 17 collisions involving APD employees. Eight of the 17 collisionswere determined to be preventable on the part of the officer. The median years ofservice of the officers involved in collisions is 5.5 and the median age of the officer was35.5. Eight of the collisions that occurred were officers who have 5 years or less ofservice with Auburn PD. The preventable collisions were attributed to officers with amedian of 9.5 years of service. In examining the number of collisions, it is important tonote that the department determines a collision to be any time an employee in controlof a department vehicle has any contact with another vehicle, object, or person.Damage caused by a specific maneuver (PIT, intentional strike, etc.) is not considereda collision under our department policy. The majority of these collisions did not meetthe state definition of a reportable collision. In reviewing the 8 collisions which were determined by a Collision Review Board to bepreventable, “driver inattention” was apparent in most cases, by either watching forsuspects or looking at vehicle equipment inside the car. If the drivers had been moreattentive, they would not have collided with another vehicle, curb, tree, etc. All 2021collisions (preventable and non-preventable) are categorized as follows: COLLISIONSPage 82 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATION 7 - Driver Inattention  0 - Improper Backing  0 - Fail to Clear Intersection  8 - Other driver at fault  2 - Poor tactics COLLISIONS CONT. 2019181714 1410805101520252018 2019 2020 20212018-2021 CollisionsCollisionsPreventablePage 83 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONThe below chart depicts the corrective action dispensed to the employees in preventable collisions. Some officers also received additional training where it was appropriate.COLLISIONS CONT.02468101214Coaching Written Reprimand Suspension Dismissal1310082007100CollisionsCorrective Action 2019Corrective Action 2020Corrective Action 2021Page 84 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONCOMBINED DISCIPLINEActions Taken Internal Investigations The following chart depicts action taken for misconduct, whether from an InternalInvestigation or Supervisory Investigation, for each employee involved. Page 85 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONTo ensure that our investigations are unbiased, there are times when an outside agency may be asked to investigate serious allegations of misconduct made against agency staff, especially those that may be of a criminal nature. This provides Auburn citizens with confidence and allows for unbiased transparency into actions, activities, and decisions made by the Auburn Police Department. In 2021 there was one allegation of criminal misconduct investigated by the King County Prosecutors Office. No criminal charges were filed in this case. OUTSIDE AGENCY INVESTIGATIONSPage 86 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONOne of the Internal Investigations that concluded during 2021 was grieved to a level 3,which is reviewed by the Mayor. This Internal Investigation involved a finding of ActualMisconduct. The discipline was lowered from a Written Reprimand to Coaching andCounseling by the Mayor at the level 3 grievance. GRIEVANCESPage 87 of 88 SERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONSERVICE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY WELLNESS CELEBRATIONA review of the frequency of incidents for 2021 regarding alleged misconduct byemployees of the Auburn Police Department does not appear to raise any specificconcerns. The number of allegations and found misconduct when compared to theactual number of contacts Auburn Police Officers encounter each year is extremely low.This illustrates and confirms that we take all complaints seriously and train ouremployees regularly, and when necessary use corrective action depending on theseverity of the allegation. CONCLUSIONPage 88 of 88