HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgendaPacket_SKHHP_ExecutiveBoard_2024_2_16_ReportaddSKHHP Executive Board
February 16, 2024, 1:00 – 3:00 PM
Virtual Meeting
Video conference:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/99857398028?pwd=eXFiMmJpQm1abDZmMmRQbHNOYS8ydz09
OR by phone: 253-205-0468
Meeting ID: 998 5739 8028 Password: 085570
I. CALL TO ORDER
a.
b.
AND ADVISORY BOARD REPRESENTATIVE
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
III. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 19, 2024 MINUTES
Motion is to approve the January 19, 2024 SKHHP
Executive Board meeting minutes.
1:09
1:10
Presenter: Claire V. Goodwin, SKHHP Executive Manager
Purpose: To elect a Chair and Vice-Chair to the SKHHP
Executive Board.
Background: Chair and Vice-Chair elections are held annually
to serve a 1-year term and are elected from the appointed
members of the Board. The Chair of the Executive Board
presides over meetings of the Executive Board. The Vice-
Chair, in the absence of the Chair, performs all duties
incumbent upon the Chair.
Prior to the meeting, nominations were received as follows:
• Nancy Backus for Chair
• Dana Ralph for Vice-Chair
Other nominations for Chair and Vice-Chair positions may be
brought forward at the meeting.
Motion is to approve the nomination for Chair.
Motion is to approve the nomination for Vice-Chair.
SKHHP MEMBERSHIP
Presenter: Claire V. Goodwin, SKHHP Executive Manager
Purpose: To consider approval of the City of SeaTac
Agreement adding the City of SeaTac as a party to the SKHHP
Interlocal Agreement.
Background: At the October 2023 and January 2024 SKHHP
Executive Board meetings, the Executive Manager provided
an update on SeaTac’s interest and consideration in becoming
a party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement. At the January 23,
2024 SeaTac City Council meeting, Council approved
execution of the agreement to become a SKHHP member
jurisdiction, adopted the 2024 SKHHP work plan and budget,
and approved allocation of $300,000 from the general fund to
contribute towards the 2024 SKHHP Housing Capital Fund.
Adding a party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement requires
final approval by a two-thirds majority vote of the SKHHP
Executive Board. A simple majority of the Board will determine
operational funding obligations SeaTac shall commit to as a
condition of becoming a Party to the Agreement.
Motion is to approve the SeaTac Agreement and authorize
the SKHHP Chair to execute Agreement.
Motion is to approve the pro-rated 2024 operational
member contribution by the City of SeaTac in the amount
of $10,456.
1:35
Presenter: Amanda Santo, Chief Operations Officer, MSC;
Kristen York, Chief Executive Officer, MSC
Purpose: Provide an opportunity to hear and learn from
developers working in South King County.
Background: Formed in 1971, MSC provides housing, rental
assistance, employment support, and essential resources to
the South King County community. A longtime partner with
SKHHP, MSC has been a member of the SKHHP Advisory
Board since November 2021. SKHHP recommended funding
for MSC in the 2023 Housing Capital Fund funding round to
support the rehabilitation of the Victorian Place II Apartments
located in Des Moines, WA.
b. 2024 STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Presenter: Dorsol Plants, SKHHP Program Coordinator
Purpose: A brief update of housing and land use legislation
under consideration during the 2024 State Legislative Session.
Background: The Washington State Legislature convened for a
short session beginning January 8, 2024. SKHHP staff will
monitor and provide updates on legislation connected with
focus will be provided on any bills which further SKHHP’s
adopted legislative priority, “to fund all aspects of affordable
housing.”
VII. BOARD BUSINESS CONTINUED
a. 2025 WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT SURVEY
Purpose: Solicit initial feedback from the Executive Board for
the development of the 2025 work plan through a survey.
Background: SKHHP’s Interlocal Agreement requires the
Executive Board recommend an annual work plan and budget
by June 1. To develop a draft work plan and budget for
consideration, this survey will help inform that process. A
recommended 2025 work plan and budget will be presented at
the April 19 Executive Board Meeting for adoption, followed by
Council action by each member jurisdiction by July 12.
For review, discussion, and receipt of Board feedback, no
action proposed.
Presenter: Claire V. Goodwin, SKHHP Executive Manager
Purpose: Presentation of the 2023 quarter four budget and
progress report for Executive Board review.
Background: Staff provides quarterly budget and progress
reports consistent with the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement. The
quarter 4 progress report serves as the annual report. The
report serves as an accountability and progress update as well
as a tool for Board members to update their member Councils
and other interested parties. Staff presentation followed by
Board discussion provides the opportunity for feedback prior to
finalization and distribution to member jurisdictions.
For review, discussion, and Board feedback only, no
action is proposed.
2:35
• Preservation strategies update
• In-person Executive Board meeting in March
VIII. •ADJOURN
SKHHP Executive Meeting
January 19, 2024
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Traci Buxton called the meeting to order at 1:02 PM.
ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM
Executive Board members present: Merina Hanson (alternate), City of Kent; Colleen Brandt-
Schluter, City of Burien; Traci Buxton, City of Des Moines; Brian Davis, City of Federal Way;
Victoria Schroff (alternate), City of Maple Valley; Eric Zimmerman, City of Normandy Park; Ryan
McIrvin, City of Renton; Dennis Martinez (alternate), City of Tukwila; Sunaree Marshall, King
County.
Others present: Claire Goodwin, SKHHP Executive Manager; Dorsol Plants, SKHHP Program
Coordinator; Tina Narron, SKHHP Advisory Board; Laural Humphrey, City of Tukwila; Dafne
Hernandez, City of Covington; Matt Torpey, City of Maple Valley; Nicholas Matz, City of
Normandy Park; Angie Mathias, City of Renton.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment was provided.
III. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 17, 2023 MINUTES
Brian Davis moved to approve the November 17, 2023 minutes as presented, seconded by
Victoria Schroff. Motion passed (8-0)
IV. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS
No modifications to the agenda were made.
V. BOARD BUSINESS
a. APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE SKHHP ADVISORY BOARD AND INTRODUCTION
Claire Goodwin provided an overview of the recruitment and selection process for the six
SKHHP Advisory Board appointment candidates:
In June, we presented a plan to recruit members to the SKHHP Advisory Board and solicited the
names of individuals the Executive Board identified to target. Since June, Dorsol Plants, SKHHP
Program Coordinator, has been actively engaged in a recruitment effort to identify potential
candidates and communicated with over 40 individuals. We received 13 applications to fill six
vacancies, and 11 interviews were conducted. The interview panel consisted of SKHHP's
Executive Board Chair and Vice Chair, Nancy Backus and Dana Ralph; SKHHP Executive
Board Member Brian Davis; Advisory Board Member Dr. Linda Smith, who participated in the
first interview; and Advisory Board Member Maju Qureshi, who participated in the second and
third interviews.
By way of background, the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement (ILA) requires us to establish a 12-15
community member Advisory Board appointed by the Executive Board. The role of the Advisory
Board is to provide advice and recommendations to the Executive Board on land and/or
resource allocation for affordable housing projects, input on policy needs related to housing
stability, program design, and development, recommendations for emergency shelter and other
immediate affordable housing needs, and to provide public education and community outreach
services. The ILA requires members appointed to the Advisory Board to know and understand
affordable housing, be committed to furthering affordable housing in South King County, and
represent diverse community perspectives. Appointments last four years, with service limited to
two consecutive terms. The Advisory Board provides feedback and recommendations on two
significant bodies of work during the work plan development process and the Housing Capital
Fund recommendations.
I am excited to present the six candidates for your consideration to appoint to the Advisory
Board today.
First is Hamdi Abdulle. Hamdi is a resident of Kent and would represent African Community
Housing & Development. Hamdi brings her experience leading this non-profit housing developer
and has deep experience working with the African diaspora immigrant and refugee community.
Second is Marie Arns. Maria is a resident of Kent and would not be representing an
organization. Maria brings her passion for addressing affordable housing challenges and her
background as a person who has experienced homelessness, which is a crucial perspective for
our Advisory Board.
Third is Kent Hay. Kent is a resident of Auburn and would not be representing an organization.
He brings deep experience working to address homelessness in South King County.
Fourth is Kathleen Hosfeld. Kathleen is a resident of Seattle and would represent Homestead
Community Land Trust. You may recall Katheleen’s presentation to the Executive Board earlier
in the year on the community land trust model for maintaining affordability through
homeownership. Kathleen brings her experience leading a successful non-profit community land
trust and developing affordable housing with projects in South King County.
Fifth is Olga Lindbom. Olga is a resident of Federal Way and would represent Open Doors for
Multicultural Families. Olga brings her experience supporting families with an intellectual and/or
developmental disability through a social services organization.
And sixth is Rumi Takahashi. Rumi is a resident of Seattle and would represent SMR Architects.
SMR architects designs, preserves, and advocates for affordable housing, and they have
projects in South King County. Rumi brings her passion for affordable housing development and
perspective as an architect of affordable housing.
All candidates identified experience working with low-income households, BIPOC community
members, immigrant and refugee populations, people experiencing homelessness or housing
insecurity, veterans, aging adults/seniors, and youth. Most candidates identified experience
working with LGBTQ+ communities, people living with disabilities and/or behavioral health
needs, people with a criminal history, and multigenerational households.
Brian Davis added that after having the opportunity to interview all the candidates, he was
excited about who was being recommended. Deliberations took some time, and the panel had
the excellent problem of picking from a group of strong candidates. He is looking forward to
working with the six selected candidates.
Brian Davis moved to adopt Resolution 2024-01, appointing the recommended candidates to
the SKHHP Advisory Board for a term of four years, seconded by Colleen Brandt-Schluter.
Motion passed (8-0)
Eric Zimmerman joined the Executive Board meeting at 1:20 PM.
Claire Goodwin asked each of the new Advisory Board members to introduce themselves and
any current Board Members present.
Hamdi Abdulle said she was excited to join the SKHHP Advisory Board and has worked to
support her community in SeaTac for a long time. The road was very steep coming to the US
and the State of Washington, but my experience has taught me a lot, and I am glad to share
that with the Advisory Board.
Kathleen Hosfeld is the CEO of Homestead Community Land Trust and the proud new owner of
a rental housing project in Renton. While Homestead is new to rental work, the governance
structure is unique and creates greater resident autonomy. She is excited to work in partnership
with everyone moving forward and bringing more homeownership to South King County.
Olga Lindbom said she is honored to be a part of the SKHHP Advisory Board and to add the
voice of the communities she is a part of and represents. She has worked for the past ten years
at Open Doors for Multicultural Families, providing programs and services for families at the
intersection of cultural/linguistic diversity and disability in South King County.
Rumi Takahashi said she is excited to join the organization and get to know her fellow board
members. She has worked behind the scenes on the design and construction of affordable
housing and is excited to jump into the policy side to help develop better housing.
Tina Narron is the Chief Lending Officer at Verity Credit Union and joined the Advisory Board in
February 2023. What drew her to SKHHP is that it matched Verity’s mission to help build
generational wealth and support affordable housing. SKHHP is one way to ensure that someone
is speaking about the need for equitable housing programs.
Uche Okezie serves as a private citizen on the Advisory Board and is a resident of Burien. She
joined to help create change and ensure affordable rental and homeownership opportunities.
She has been a board member since November 2021 and has enjoyed the work, including
funding projects through the Housing Capital Fund.
Claire Goodwin thanked the Advisory Board members for introducing themselves and
congratulated the new Advisory Board members. She confirmed with Dorsol Plants that the next
Advisory Board meeting was on February 1, 2024.
Traci Buxton stated she was grateful and impressed by the quality of the candidates and their
work professionally and as volunteers to improve their community.
VI. BRIEFING
a. INTRODUCTION TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF)
Claire Goodwin began by reminding the Executive Board that at the June 2023 meeting on long-
term funding strategies for the Housing Capital Fund, the Board identified tax increment
financing (or TIF) as a topic of interest to learn more about. The Executive Board confirmed their
continued interest at the November 2023 Board meeting, and subsequently, SKHHP staff
identified one of the TIF subject matter experts. That subject matter expert is Morgan Shook,
Partner/Senior Policy Advisory at ECOnorthwest, and Morgan has graciously offered to present
to us today. Morgan has deep expertise in economic, market, and financial analytics that he
brings to bear in business, enterprise, and policy settings. Morgan regularly works for various
government, business, and non-profit clients, providing analyses highlighting opportunities,
consequences, and trade-offs of land and infrastructure decisions.
After Morgan’s presentation, Brian Davis from the City of Federal Way will discuss his
perspective of TIF and Federal Way’s utilization of the tool to redevelop a vital area of the city.
Morgan Shook explained that his expertise is twofold: on the housing and infrastructure sides.
On housing, he has worked on land development for affordable housing developers and local
government, particularly transit agencies in Washington, Oregon, and California. In Washington,
the focus has been on helping to steer equitable development to create deeply affordable units
and advance other community benefits. His early history of policy development was working
with cities when Washington State offered a tax credit to encourage the annexation of large
areas, which led to an understanding of the fiscal challenges many cities face.
Washington has had a TIF program for roughly thirty years and was initially called Community
Revitalization Financing (CRF). CRF was only used between the City and County of Spokane,
and it was a tax-sharing arrangement between the two entities to allow neighborhood-level
community planning for infrastructure. This process needed more support for economic
development and led to the creation of two laws in the 2000s: the Local Infrastructure Financing
Tool (LIFT) and Local Revitalization Financing (LRF). LIFT was very popular and allowed a
sales tax credit of up to $25 million back to the jurisdiction, which several cities successfully
used. The downside was that it required the state to provide funding for the program. LIFT
would morph into the LRF, which was not competitive but was a first-in, first-out tool. Roughly
25 cities would receive funding over five rounds between the two programs. Over the years, the
Association of Washington Cities and others would lobby for the state legislature to provide
some specialized infrastructure funding tool. In 2021, the legislature would establish a robust
TIF process in response to the economic challenges brought on by COVID-19.
TIF is an economic development tool available to cities, counties, and ports that allows
increased property tax revenue stemming from private development to be used "up front" to
invest in infrastructure to support the development. TIF is designed to benefit a specific site or
area with high certainty that development will occur. TIF is established by a "but/for" agreement,
meaning the development would not occur without the infrastructure improvements. This can
include the argument that the development would only occur on-time, at-scale, or match the
community's desires with that investment.
The Tax Increment Area (TIA) is sometimes known as a TIF district and is the area where the
incremental values are calculated. Inside a TIA, the base value is the taxable value of properties
in the TIA at the time it is created based on the tax year it is established. The increment value is
any positive change above that base value in any given year the increment is being measured.
Finally, public improvement is defined by the infrastructure funded by the TIF investment, and
there is a legal requirement that a local government must own these.
TIF funds can be spent in two general ways. The first side is what is in the "but/for" argument or
the things which must be built to support the development. These can be things inside and
outside of the TIA and can include road construction, water/sewer connections, parks, transit
facilities, brownfield mitigation, and other items generally considered public infrastructure. An
example of an improvement outside of the TIA might be a roadway intersection a 0.5 mile away,
which requires improvement to allow for the increased traffic the new development will bring to
the area. The second group of expenditures are things you can spend TIF funds on that do not
fit into the "but/for" argument. This can include purchasing, rehabilitating, retrofitting for energy
improvements, and constructing housing to create or preserve long-term affordable housing.
Energy retrofits are not required to be tied to affordable housing but can be used separately or
to rehabilitate affordable housing. Additionally, funds can be spent to improve security and
maintenance for public improvements and relocate and construct government facilities.
A TIF is created by an ordinance that designates the TIA and identifies the public improvements
being financed. The ordinance must be adopted by June 1 to create it for the following tax year.
If a jurisdiction wanted to meet this year's June 1 threshold, you would use the certified
assessed tax values in the TIA from 2023, and next year, the increment will be calculated off the
increased value in 2024. Because there is a lag between when taxes are assessed and
collected, most jurisdictions would not receive actual money in hand until late 2025 or early
2026. Once the ordinance is adopted, a jurisdiction cannot change the boundary of the TIA or
add additional public improvements.
Outside the ordinance, some procedural steps exist to establish a TIF. The jurisdiction must
hold at least two public meetings solely on the proposed TIF. A project analysis must also be
submitted to the State Treasurer for review and comment. Based on their analysis, the
Treasurer has 90 days to issue a letter and comments back to the jurisdiction. Responding to
the letter or comments is not required, but the letter must be made available for public review.
The Treasurer will look at several items during their analysis. This will include TIA boundaries,
the duration of the increment area, and a description of the expected private development with
scenarios describing the project with and without proposed public improvements. The real
property in the TIA will be assessed for its value and any impacts necessary to address or
mitigate, such as impacts on the local business community, affordable housing, and public
schools.
Additionally, if 20% of the assessed valuation of fire districts is included in the TIA or there is an
increased level of service, a mitigation plan must be implemented. The fire districts are the only
ones named for mitigation because many areas see the fire district as having the highest
property levy. As a provider, fire districts have a different level of control related to these issues
than a city.
In the first two years, Morgan Shook has supported the analysis of 18 proposed TIFs in
Washington. Four jurisdictions have created TIF districts, and another three are likely to begin
this year. During the analysis, the Treasurer is keenly looking at the financial risks and
creditworthiness. They want to ensure that the jurisdictions have done their math but also
considered downside risks, such as how much a developer is sharing the risk or what reserves
may be available during a downfall. Ultimately, the jurisdiction is on the hook, unlike LIFT or
LRF, and the Treasurer’s desire is to see mitigation plans in place.
Boundary considerations for TIF include that the sponsoring jurisdiction cannot have more than
two TIAs at a time, and the boundaries cannot overlap. Increment areas at the time of creation
can total up to $200 million in assessed valuation or be at most 20% of the total assessed
valuation for the sponsoring jurisdiction. It is important to note that the $200 million, or 20% limit,
is the summation of both TIAs in a single jurisdiction. The 20% limit is most likely to impact
decision-making for smaller jurisdictions, but the $200 million limitation is more likely to be the
limiting factor for larger jurisdictions. An ideal TIA is an area with a low base valuation near
significant near or long-term development. Most of the TIF value will occur later in the life of the
area, and to keep the risk low, one should limit the list of infrastructure investments to small,
essential projects. A TIA is not a "set it and forget it" arrangement; there is uncertainty, such as
a project delay or the assessment failing to capture everything that could occur in a year.
Calculating the base value of a TIA is the added taxable value inside the boundary area. This
will remain the base value over the potential 25 years of TIF. The increment is a non-negative
number and is the district's valuation in that year minus the established base value. When the
developer pays property taxes to the State, the State sends the increment value back to the
sponsoring jurisdiction for investment.
It is important to note that TIF affects regular property tax levies. A regular levy is subject to
constitutional provisions such as the 1% limit factor. This means almost all property tax levies
are included except state school levies, excess levies, and local school levies. Using an
example from Shoreline, the 2023 tax rate was $9.68, and the property tax levies eligible for TIF
sum $3.46, giving a 36% levy capture rate. By looking at the tax rate and the levies impacted,
you can better understand what is available for TIF allocation.
TIF dollars can only be spent on public improvements outlined in the ordinance and can only run
for 25 years. Bonds issued will count against the jurisdiction's debt capacity, and no state
backup exists. Any additional revenue after covering the cost of public improvements or
repaying the bonds must be returned to the tax district in proportion to the regular tax levy rates.
Local governments may be responsible for reimbursing the County Assessor, but this has yet to
occur in King County.
The state legislature is considering a bill allowing junior tax districts to opt out of a TIF. This
would lessen the revenue available and is likely based on a misunderstanding of the state tax
structure. Compared to other states, Washington has a unique tax structure, which causes
things to look and work differently. Many jurisdictions interpret TIF as a way they lose revenue
and on the face that seems easy to understand. The state law has a provision known as "Do no
harm," which changed how district levies are computed to stay within the 1% limit factor but also
provided new levy capacity to pay for the money going out of TIF. You can only increase your
levy by 1% a year plus some amount of add-ons such as the value of new construction times
last year's levy. The TIF law created an "increment add-on," which allows you to multiply the
increment with last year's levy to compensate for funds lost to a TIF. You do lose money at the
TIF level, but new money at the district level offsets that amount.
The Alexan, located in Shoreline, is used as an example to determine how much money would
be available. The Alexan is a 300-unit multifamily project assumed to begin construction in
2025. The preconstruction assessed value of the site is around $5.2 million. If the city were to
create a TIF around the immediate area of the development, there would be a nominal cash
flow of $11.2 million over twenty-five years. This would support a bond of up to $7 million for the
development of affordable housing, childcare, or other infrastructure. This example looks at a
single development, but most of the analysis work done so far includes multiple sites in a single
area. One example includes planning around the Kirkland, WA, Link light rail station area that
can potentially bond $50-$80 million against the present value. The bigger you get means more
revenue, but the greater number of projects reduces the certainty.
TIF cash flow can take time to ramp up, and most of the revenue will come in the later years.
Sponsors must have a financial plan to cover early 'deficit' years. Even for an entirely sure TIF
project, there will be shortfall years. The Treasurer’s review will examine how carefully
jurisdictions have looked at these problems and how they will mitigate small to larger shortfalls.
Project analysis must look at a project's potential impacts on affordable housing. It has been
understood that it is not about broad impacts, such as affordability going up or down in the area,
but specific impacts, such as demolishing an existing affordable housing unit. Thus far, most of
the TIA's have been in urban, commercial areas and have not impacted existing affordable
housing. The conversation around affordable housing has tied more directly into planning and
policy discussions, such as using TIF dollars to help fund land acquisition, pre-development
activities, or gap funding. No one has done that, but many cities have been thinking about that.
The first phase of TIF has been building new areas for jurisdictions. The second phase appears
to focus more on using TIF to meet the need for affordable housing.
Some top issues impacting the TIF conversation include opportunity costs and tying low-value
areas with a desire to develop or being limited to only two TIFs simultaneously. Development
scaling and timing are also a challenge, as more development creates a greater sense of
uncertainty. A TIF will have to be managed year after year and cannot be set in place and left
alone. Additionally, managing and preparing for the deficit years that will occur over the 25
years of the TIF is more challenging for some jurisdictions than others. Finally, infrastructure
demands are significant, and there is a constant need to balance those against the impact on
the taxpayers.
Brian Davis provided a brief update on the City of Federal Way's use of TIF. Federal Way is
currently working on a mitigation plan with the fire district as part of its efforts to utilize TIF. TIF
is a long-game strategy, and fire districts tend to focus more on the moment due to the nature of
their services. If it is possible to consider the long game, TIF can be a truly effective strategy.
While working in Oregon, TIF enabled revitalization and started several developments only
possible with the investment TIF allowed. Federal Way has had some great discussions and
hopes to redevelop a portion of the city's downtown area around the 320th Street corridor to
include mixed-use development. This area is adjacent to one of the incoming Link light rail
stations, a prime location for future development. The City is monitoring the changes at the state
legislature, which would allow junior districts to opt-out and potentially have a negative impact
on future TIF development. There is a real challenge when choosing to forgo current tax
revenue for future development, which may be years from completion.
Traci Buxton wanted to confirm that TIF fundamentally works by taking out a bond to support
development in the area, and the jurisdiction receives taxes based on the increased value to
pay back the bond. Morgan Shook confirmed that was the basic concept when utilizing TIF.
Victoria Schroff asked if the slides would be made available after the presentation. Claire
Goodwin confirmed that it would be available and could be found in the agenda packet.
Traci Buxton asked if it was possible to bond against the projected value, not just the current
one. Morgan Shook confirmed yes, and nothing prevents a jurisdiction from paying as they go
as an alternative. Due to issues each jurisdiction faces, some have considered doing multiple
debt issuances, but it does get more complicated.
Traci Buxton asked how a tax-exempt status, such as an MFTE, may interact with a TIF and if
you would want to avoid having an MFTE project inside the TIA. Morgan Shook confirmed that
you would not want an MFTE inside a TIA, though you could account for the loss in tax revenue
as part of the financial planning. Brian Davis added that Federal Way is currently looking at this
interaction and considering the impacts of an MFTE inside their projected TIA. It is essential to
avoid cannibalizing your tax revenue too much. You can consider and mitigate the impact of a
tax-exempt project inside a TIA.
b. 2024 STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Dorsol Plants provided an update on the 2024 Washington State Legislative Session. The intent
is to provide a high-level overview of a few housing and land use bills that tie into SKHHP's
legislative priority or have seen a lot of attention in the last two weeks.
The SKHHP 2024 legislative priority focuses on funding all aspects of affordable housing. This
includes homeownership for moderate-income households and below, preservation of naturally
occurring affordable housing (NOAH), land acquisition to secure permanent affordability,
permanent supportive housing (PSH), infrastructure around affordable housing developments,
and workforce housing.
Reviewing the legislative session timeline, the next key date is January 31, which is the policy
committee cutoff or when policy bills need to be voted and approved out of committee to
continue in the session. The final day of the legislative session will be March 7.
Some highlights from the Governor’s proposed 2024 budget for housing and homelessness
include $100 million for rapid capital acquisition and $4.5 million to support housing for those
with intellectual and/developmental disabilities. Additionally, $10 million to backfill document
recording fee lost revenue, $7.5 million for landlord mitigation and tenant preservation, and $2.5
million for an emergency housing fund for cities, counties, and non-profits to support people
needing emergency housing assistance. Not shown on the slides but included in the budget is
an additional $10 million proposed for the Right of Way Initiative and $10 million for an
encampment resolution program.
Several bills related to funding housing this year are in the legislative session. One bill to
highlight is SB 6173. SB 6173 was in its first public hearing today and is now scheduled for
Executive Session on January 24; the bill would add language that would enable SHB 1406
funds to be used to support the development of affordable homeownership opportunities up to
80% AMI.
HB 1892 would create the Workforce Housing Accelerator Revolving Loan Fund Program
(WHLP) within the Department of Commerce (DOC) and direct DOC to contract with the
Washington State Housing Finance Commission (WSHFC) to administer the revolving loan
program. The funding would be drawn from the General Fund, and as of the time of this
presentation, the funding amount has yet to be decided. A current limit of $20 million per county
per year strives for geographic equity.
Like last year, we have a transit-oriented development bill (TOD). HB 2160 and SB 6024 have
had some changes when introduced and since the session began. The bill defines "station
areas" as within a 0.5 mile walking radius of light rail, commuter rail, and streetcars and within a
0.25 mile walking radius of bus rapid transit. Within station areas, cities are prohibited from
imposing a maximum density in terms of homes per acre and from imposing parking
requirements, except those dedicated exclusively to individuals with disabilities. While there is a
lot in these bills, one item to call out is the requirement for the Department of Transportation to
designate a liaison as a point of contact for local governments and project proponents regarding
land use decisions and processing development permit applications.
SB 5961 and HB 2114 have seen a lot of attention in the legislature and the media. Both bills
are commonly referred to as “Rent Stabilization." They both seek to limit rent increases for most
tenants to 5% per year. However, it exempts tenancies in homes built within the past ten years
or those operated by a public development authority, housing authority, or non-profit
organization where maximum rents are already restricted. It will also require six months’ notice
for a rent increase of 3% or more. Additionally, it will ensure that fees count as rent to calculate
a rental increase and limit move-in fees to the equivalent of one month's rent or less. It will also
limit late fees to $10.
While only some legislative bills were reviewed, the housing and land use bills that SKHHP staff
will track through the legislative session are listed in the PowerPoint presentation. Each bill is
hyperlinked so you can easily see current status information or read the bill at your
convenience.
Dorsol Plants thanked the Executive Board for the opportunity to present and informed them he
would provide a legislative update each month through the end of the session.
Claire Goodwin added that she wanted to highlight SB 6173, which she mentioned has been
discussed by the Executive Board on several occasions and had sent information to the
Executive Board earlier that week. Several board members signed in and spoke on the bill,
which would enable SHB 1406 funds to serve households up to 80% AMI for homeownership.
She will continue to send alerts she believes are of interest to the Board.
UPDATES/ANNOUNCEMENTS
Claire Goodwin provided an update on the SKHHP Chair and Vice-Chair elections. Nominations
for Nancy Backus for Chair and Dana Ralph for Vice-Chair have been received. Elections will be
held at the February Executive Board meeting due to several board members needing to attend
the Conference of Mayors.
Claire Goodwin informed the Executive Board that the City of SeaTac will take final action on
January 23, 2024, to join SKHHP. If the City Council does approve the Interlocal Agreement, the
Board will take action at the February meeting to incorporate the City of SeaTac as a member of
SKHHP.
Claire Goodwin provided an update on planning for the Executive Board meeting over the next
few months. Based on feedback from the Executive Board, developers will come to present their
current work in South King County. This will start at the February meeting, where we will hear
from the 2023 Housing Capital Fund recipient, Multi-Service Center. Additionally, SKHHP staff
will begin visiting each member city council to receive concurrence on the 2023 Housing Capital
Fund recommendation over the next few months. Finally, the work on the 2025 Work Plan and
2024 Housing Capital Fund guidelines will begin in February and move quickly in preparation for
Claire Goodwin’s maternity leave from May to September.
Claire Goodwin will be on vacation from January 22 to 26. Executive Board members needing
support can contact the SKHHP Program Coordinator, Dorsol Plants.
Sunaree Marshall provided an update that she will also be on maternity leave around the same
time as Claire Goodwin and will provide an update on who will serve on the Executive Board in
her absence soon.
Traci Buxton congratulated both Claire Goodwin and Sunaree Marshall.
VII. ADJOURN
Traci Buxton adjourned the meeting at 2:47 PM.
Interlocal Agreement Between South King Housing and Homelessness Partners
(“SKHHP”) and the City of SeaTac
This Companion Agreement (“SeaTac Companion Agreement”) expands the Parties of
the South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (“SKHHP”) Interlocal Agreement to include
the City of SeaTac, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, the SeaTac Companion Agreement is made pursuant to the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, chapter 39.34 RCW, for the purpose of adding a municipal government to the
original SKHHP Interlocal Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent,
Normandy Park, Renton, Tukwila, and King County executed the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement
with an effective date of January 1, 2019 and the city of Maple Valley executed a companion
agreement with SKHHP on February 4, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the “Parties”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties have a common goal to ensure the availability of housing that
meets the needs of all income levels in South King County; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to provide a sound base of housing policies and programs in
South King County and complement the efforts of existing public and private organizations to
address housing needs in South King County; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to act cooperatively to formulate affordable housing policies
and strategies that address housing stability, to foster efforts to preserve and provide
affordable housing by combining public funding with private-sector resources, to support
implementation of the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act, related
countywide planning policies, and other local policies and programs relating to affordable
housing, and to do so efficiently and expeditiously; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that the most efficient and expeditious way for
the Parties to address affordable housing needs in South King County is thro ugh cooperative
action and pooling public and private resources; and
WHEREAS, the intent of this cooperative undertaking is not to duplicate efforts of non -
profit organizations and other entities already providing affordable-housing-related services;
and
WHEREAS, a cooperative work plan with a primary focus on the production and
preservation of affordable housing, is needed because the lack of access to affordable housing
in one of the key contributors to homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the city of SeaTac would like to become a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal
Agreement and share in the above recited efforts cooperatively with the current Parties to the
Interlocal Agreement; and
WHEREAS, as a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, SeaTac shall agree to all the
obligations and responsibilities required of the Parties and adopt the SKHHP Interlocal
Agreement, the Work Plan, and Operating Budget and contribute monetarily to SKHHP’s
operating budget with an annual contribution; and
WHEREAS, the Parties would like SeaTac to become a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Section 20 of the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement authorizes the SKHHP
Executive Board to add the City of SeaTac as a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement upon
two-thirds majority vote of the membership of the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits, and covenants
contained in this Companion Agreement:
SKHHP agrees to the following terms and conditions:
Section 1. The SKHHP Interlocal Agreement between the cities of Auburn, Burien,
Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Normandy Park, Renton, Tukwila, and
King County is hereby expanded to include the City of SeaTac as a Party.
Section 2. As a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, SeaTac shall be afforded all
rights and responsibilities of Parties to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement.
The City of SeaTac agrees to the following terms and conditions:
Section 1. The City of SeaTac agrees to become a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal
Agreement and adopts the recitals, mutual promises, benefits, terms, covenants, and
conditions of the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement signed by the cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington,
Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and King County,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. As a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, the City of SeaTac agrees to
and adopts the 2024 SKHHP Work Plan and Operating Budget, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Section 3. As a Party to the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, the City of SeaTac agrees to
pay its share of SKHHP’s operating budget beginning in 2024, assuming this agreement is
executed by December 2023. If this agreement is signed in 2024, the City of SeaTac agrees to
pay a pro-rated amount of its share of SKHHP's 2024 operating budget, beginning on the first
day of the month this agreement is signed. SeaTac’s 2024 operating contribution shall be
$11,407. All future annual contributions will be established in the SKHHP annual operating
budget.
Section 4. This Agreement will be in full force and effect only after the City Council of
the City of SeaTac has authorized the City Manager to execute this Agreement and after the
SKHHP Executive Board affirmation by a two-thirds majority vote.
CITY OF SEATAC
___________________________________
Carl Cole, City Manager
__________
Department Head Initial
Attest:
___________________________________
Kristina Gregg, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Mary Mirante Bartolo, City Attorney
Executed this _______ day of ________________, 2024.
SOUTH KING HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS PARTNERS
___________________________________
Nancy Backus, SKHHP Executive Board Chair
Executed this _______ day of ________________, 2024.
ATTACHED
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 1 of 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE SOUTH KING HOUSING AND
HOMELESSNESS PARTNERS (SKHHP), ADOPTING THE 2024 SKHHP WORK PLAN AND
OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement, the SKHHP Executive Board approves
an annual work plan and budget each year to guide the work of SKHHP staff; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement, the annual budget includes an
itemization of all categories of budgeted expenses and itemization of each Party’s contribution,
including in-kind services; and
WHEREAS, upon adoption by the Executive Board, the annual work plan and budget will
be transmitted to each participating jurisdiction for approval by their legislative body; and
WHEREAS, the budget will not become effective until approved by the legislative body of
each jurisdiction and adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board; and
WHEREAS, if a party does not approve the work plan or budget in a timely manner, the
Executive Board may adopt the budget and work plan with a two-thirds majority vote; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the annual work plan and budget is to provide management
and budget guidance, and implement the overarching SKHHP mission to work together and
share resources to increase the available options for South King County residents to access
affordable housing and to preserve the existing affordable housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 work plan includes four goals with corresponding action items that
further SKHHP’s mission.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE EXECUTIVE BOARD RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Executive Board adopts the 2024 SKHHP Work Plan in Attachment A.
Section 2. The Executive Board adopts the 2024 SKHHP Operating Budget in Attachment B.
Section 3. Each party’s contribution to SKHHP’s operating budget will be transmitted on an
annual basis during the first quarter of the calendar year.
Section 4. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force upon approval by the legislative
body of each participating jurisdiction.
Dated and Signed this __22nd_day of _____May, 2023
_________________________
NANCY BACKUS, CHAIR, SOUTH KING HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS PARTNERS
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 2 of 7
RESOLUTION 2023-01 – ATTACHMENT A
SKHHP 2024 WORK PLAN
PURPOSE
Establish a 2024 SKHHP work plan and budget that is guided by Executive Board priorities, is
consistent with the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, and furthers SKHHP’s mission.
BACKGROUND
Established by an interlocal agreement, SKHHP jurisdictions work together and share resources to
increase options for South King County residents to access affordable housing and preserve existing
affordable housing. The 2024 SKHHP work plan builds on work done in previous years and was
developed in collaboration with the Executive Board, Advisory Board, and staff work group.
The work plan is organized into four goals with corresponding objectives and action items. Each action
is identified by priority as follows:
• Higher – Identified as higher priority by Executive Board or is necessary to carry out the Interlocal
Agreements
• Medium – Identified as mid-level priority
• Lower – Identified as lower priority
Quarterly budget and progress reports on the status of the work plan elements will be submitted to the
SKHHP Executive Board and the legislative body of each member jurisdiction as follows:
Quarter 1: May | Quarter 2: August | Quarter 3: November | Quarter 4: February
In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement, the 2024 SKHHP work plan and budget will be approved
by the SKHHP Executive Board and the legislative body of each member jurisdiction.
SKHHP MISSION
South King County jurisdictions working together and sharing resources to create a coordinated,
comprehensive, and equitable approach to increasing housing stability, reducing homelessness, and
producing and preserving quality affordable housing in South King County.
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Number Goal Objective
1 Fund the expansion and
preservation of affordable housing.
Coordinate public resources to attract
greater private and public investment for
affordable housing in South King County.
preserve affordable housing.
to promote sound housing policy.
County.
South King County needs at a local,
administration.
Interlocal Agreement requirements.
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 3 of 7
Goal 1
Fund the expansion and preservation of affordable housing.
Actions
Priority of Actions
••• = Higher
•• = Medium
facilitate conversations with member jurisdictions to identify and
explore dedicated sources of revenue for affordable housing at the
approval from participating Councils and preparing contract
annual guidelines, updating application materials, soliciting proposals,
Indicators
o
o
o
o
o
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 4 of 7
Goal 2
Develop policies to expand and preserve affordable housing.
Actions
Priority of Actions
••• = Higher
•• = Medium
• = Lower
homelessness topics, especially as they relate to the goals of the work
Indicators
o
o
o
o
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 5 of 7
Goal 3
Serve as advocate for South King County.
Actions
Priority of Actions
••• = Higher
•• = Medium
• = Lower
organizations and stakeholder groups to provide education and
engagement opportunities for elected officials and community
promote shared affordable housing goals and equitable geographic
that help advance SKHHP’s mission and provide a voice for increasing
Indicators
o
o
o
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 6 of 7
Goal 4
Manage operations and administration.
Actions
Priority of Actions
••• = Higher
•• = Medium
• = Lower
regular financial reports for the SKHHP Housing Capital Fund and SKHHP
Indicators
o
o
o
o
o
o
-------------------------------
Resolution No. 2023-01
May 19, 2023
Page 7 of 7
RESOLUTION 2023-01 – ATTACHMENT B
2024 SKHHP Operating Budget
Estimated beginning fund balance - January 1, 2024 $ 205,736
Estimated ending fund balance -December 31, 2024 $ 144,877
REVENUES Auburn $ 39,543
Burien $ 22,814
Covington $ 11,407
Des Moines $ 11,407
Federal Way $ 51,710
Kent $ 51,710
Maple Valley $ 11,407
Normandy Park $ 6,084
Renton $ 51,710
Tukwila $ 11,407
King County* $ 51,710
Additional King County* $ 23,290
Interest earnings $ 2,100
Office space (in-kind donation) $ 12,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 358,299
Spend down balance $ 60,859
TOTAL $ 419,158
EXPENSES Salaries and benefits $ 305,344
Interfund IT $ 31,500
Advisory Board compensation $ 14,400
Office space (in-kind donation) $ 12,000
Other professional services/Misc. $ 6,400
Travel $ 5,250
Professional development $ 5,250
Supplies $ 2,000
Subtotal $ 382,144
Administering agency - 10% admin fee** $ 37,014
TOTAL $ 419,158
*King County contribution based on the population of unincorporated King County is shown as increasing at the same rate as other partner
jurisdictions and the additional allocation decreasing to maintain a total contribution of $75,000 per year.
**10% administrative fee is calculated as a percentage of operating costs which excludes in-kind donations and carry-forwards.
Building a future
without poverty
by creating
pathways to help,
hope, and dignity
for our neighbors.Kirsten York, CEO
Kirsten.york@mschelps.org
Amanda Santo, COO
Amandas@mschelps.org
Building a future
without poverty
by creating
pathways to help,
hope, and dignity
for our neighbors.
Since 1971, MSC has been providing help, hope, and change for our
neighbors in South King County. We employ around 100 people, and
rely on the generosity of over 600 volunteers to provide services.
MSC is a community action agency and believes that everyone
deserves a chance and that connected neighbors create healthy
communities. We seek and use community input to provide
solutions. And, we believe in the power of partnership to help
people change their lives.
MSC is a 501(c)3 non-profit that is funded through private support
from individuals and businesses, as well as local, regional, and
federal funding sources.
Utility assistance is available to help low -income individuals and families
pay all or part of their home energy, water, and sewer bills, as well as
purchase an AC unit. If you qualify, payment is sent directly to your
provider. If your service is still connected, but you can't pay your bill, or if
your service has been disconnected call our appointment line at 253 -517-
2263 (24 hrs) or visit www.mschelps.org/gethelp/energy for eligibility and
to schedule an appointment.
MSC's Federal Way Food Bank is open to all who live within the Federal Way
School District, and those who live in zip code 98422 (NE Tacoma.)
FOOD BANK HOURS:
Monday, Wednesday, Friday from 10am-2pm (closed Federal holidays)
LOCATION:
1200 S 336th St., Federal Way
WHAT TO BRING:
Please bring a photo ID
Boxes or bags for food.
February
2022
MSC supports customers to increase their employability skills and
obtain individualized support with pursuing their next career or job
opportunity. MSC staff help identify and reduce barriers that may be
keeping customers from successfully reaching their goals. Participants
must be 18 years of age or older, live in South King County, and be
willing to work with MSC staff to achieve self -identified goals.
February
2022
Long-Term Care Ombudsmen advocate for elderly and disabled adults by
providing information about their resident rights, by working to resolve
problems on behalf of residents, and by advocating for improvements in
the long-term care system. This program serves Washington State. Call
800-562-6028 or email ltcop@mschelps.org.
With one-on-one support and proven resources, our youth and young adult
programs help young people ages 16 -21 turn their lives around and take the
critical steps toward a self -sufficient future. Our staff can provide
mentorship as well as help with education or training goals, employment,
and other resource needs. Call 253 -838-6810.
We provide culturally and linguistically appropriate support to connect participants
to community services and resources with the goal of helping families and
individuals navigate their new communities. Call 253-740-1963 for more
information.
Our culturally diverse staff provide:
•Resource navigation
•Information and referrals
•Cultural orientation and educational workshops
We provide a limited amount of rent assistance to Auburn, Burien,Federal
Way, Kent, Renton, and SeaTac residents only. A limited amount of utility
assistance is available to Des Moines, Kent, Renton, and SeaTac residents only.
Funds are limited to one-time help only. Call 253 -893-0024 on the first Tuesday
of the month between 9am to 12pm or complete an application online.
February
2022
MSC is a Regional Access Point (RAP) for King County Coordinated Entry for All
which provides housing resources for individuals throughout King County,
including MSC’s family shelter. Appointments are available to those that are
homeless, fleeing domestic violence, or leaving an institution after 90 days.
Make an appointment by calling 253-874-6718 or emailing rap@mschelps.org
with your name and a safe number or email to reach you.
Single adults, actively participating in increasing their overall well -being, who
are unhoused, and cannot afford market rate rent, can live in a supportive,
communal environment while working on securing permanent housing. For
more info on Titusville (housing for single women) call 253 -854-4406, ext.
146 and for more info on Burien Veterans House call 206-477-7022 (referral
by KCVP only).
Kenyon Place - Buckley
Maple Lane - Kent
Victorian Place - Des Moines
Mansard Estates - Auburn
White River Apts - Auburn
Villa Capri - Federal Way
Fawcett - Tacoma
Fern Hill - Tacoma
Hawthorne Lane - Graham
February
2022
SENIORS ONLY:
Colvos Terrace (62+, Gig Harbor)
Mitchell Place (62+, Federal Way)
Radcliffe Place (62+, Kent)
Rainier View (55+, Fife)
VETERANS:
William J. Wood Veterans House – Federal Way
Auburn Units Target Populations
Mansard Estates 9 General affordable
White River 24 General affordable
Des Moines
Victorian Place II 20 General affordable
Federal Way
Mitchell Place 47 Seniors
Villa Capri 86 General + 9 HAP units
William J Wood Veterans House 44 VASH – Veterans PSH
Kent
Maple Lane Court/Estates 24 General affordable
Radcliffe Place 135 Seniors
Titusville Station 29 Single women PSH
Above – Radcliffe
Top Right – William J Wood
Veterans House
Bottom Right – Mitchell Place
Preservation & Operations Challenges
•Lack of funding available for existing affordable housing portfolio
•Inability to take on additional debt service as option for continued rehab work for
aging properties
•Aging housing stock marketability
•Rising costs for insurance coverage – affordable housing providers being dropped
•High operations costs such as security and unit turns when serving high need
populations
•Need for more housing vouchers and operation subsidies
•High outstanding rent balances
Development Challenges
•High land and construction costs
•Financing structures and timelines
•Land use policies that allow for density
•Supportive permitting processes – changes in staffing, long timelines
Preservation Efforts
•Victorian Place – SKHHP funding
•White River and Maple Lane – applied for HPP Commerce funds
•Villa Capri – pending CDBG funds from City of Federal Way
Current Developments in Pipeline
•334 units at Redondo Heights to be completed by end of 2024
•Additional Food Bank location
Online: www.mschelps.org
Email: info@mschelps.org
Social: @mschelps
Phone: 253-838-6810
2024 State Legislative
Update
Dorsol Plants, SKHHP Program Coordinator
February 16, 2024
SKHHP Executive Board
1
SKHHP 2024 Legislative Priority
South King County is facing a growing
affordable housing crisis. In order to
address this crisis, we need to fund all
aspects of affordable housing, including:
• Homeownership for moderate income
households and below
• Preservation of naturally occurring
affordable housing (NOAH)
• Land acquisition to secure permanent
affordability
• Permanent supportive housing (PSH)
• Infrastructure around affordable
housing developments
• Workforce housing
2
2024 Legislative Session Timeline
First Day of 2024 Legislative Session
8 Jan.
Policy Committee Cutoff
31 Jan.
Fiscal Committee Cutoff
5 Feb.
AWC’s City Action Days 2024
7 Feb.
Chamber of Origin Cutoff
13 Feb.
Opposite Chamber Policy Committee Cutoff
21 Feb.
Opposite Chamber Fiscal Committee Cutoff
26 Feb.
Opposite Chamber Cutoff
1 Mar.
Sine Die
7 Mar.
3
HB 2354:Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their
new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction
and clarifying that a tax increment area must be dissolved when all bond
obligations are paid.
•Requires the project analysis conducted by a local government prior to establishing a tax increment area to assess impacts on local emergency medical services and public hospital services.
•Provides that a tax increment area expires prior to the sunset date if tax allocations are no longer necessary or obligated to pay any bonded indebtedness to fund public improvement costs.
•Requires mitigation agreements between local governments and affected public hospital districts.
•Requires arbitration if mitigation agreements cannot be agreed upon.
•Requires the Office of the State Treasurer to conduct a study and report to the Legislature on various metrics related to tax increment areas.
4
SB 6173: Encouraging investments in
affordable homeownership unit development
Allows SHB 1406 (RCW
82.14.540) funds to support
housing intended for owner
occupancy, as defined in RCW
84.14.010 at or below 80% of
the median income.
5
HB 1892: Concerning the workforce housing
accelerator program
Creates the Workforce Housing Accelerator Revolving Loan
Fund Program (HALP) within Department of Commerce, but
administered by the WA State Finance Commission, to issue
loans for the development of housing for households
earning 50 -80% AMI.
The loan recipient must…
•Begin construction within 180 days of award
•Adhere to the Evergreen Sustainable Development
Standard adopted by the Department of Commerce
•File an annual compliance report
•Restrict use of awarded loan funding to eligible costs
of housing as defined under RCW 43.180.020
6
HB 2160/SB 6024: Transit Oriented
Development
•Prohibits cities planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) from enacting or enforcing any development regulation within a station area that prohibits the siting of multifamily residential housing where any other residential use is permissible, with some exceptions.
•Prohibits cities planning under the GMA from enacting or enforcing any new development regulation within a station area that imposes a maximum floor area ratio of less than the transit-oriented density for any new residential or mixed-use development or imposes a maximum residential density.
•Limits the ability of cities planning under the GMA from requiring off-street parking as a condition of permitting residential or mixed-use development within a station area.
•Creates a categorical exemption from the State Environmental Policy Act for residential or mixed-use development within a station area.
7
HB 2160: Interactive
Map
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)
has created an interactive map showing
development areas adjacent to transit
that would be created by HB 2160 and
SB 5961.
The current map reflects Second
Substitute House Bill 2160 as passed out
of the House Capital Budget Committee.
8
SB 5961/HB 2114: Rent Stabilization
•Prohibits a landlord under the Residential
Landlord-Tenant Act or the Manufactured/Mobile
Home Landlord-Tenant Act from increasing a
tenant's rent during the first 12 months after the
tenancy begins and limits the amount by which a
landlord may increase a tenant's rent during any 12-
month period to 5 percent, with certain exemptions.
•Provides certain other protections for tenants,
such as rent and fee increase notice requirements,
tenant lease termination provisions, limits on move-
in fees, security deposits, and late fees, and
requirements for parity between month-to-month
and longer-term rental agreements.
•Requires the Department of Commerce to create
an online landlord resource center and requires the
Attorney General's Office to publish model lease
provisions regarding rent and rent increases.
9
Funding Affordable Housing
Bill Number Description Status
SB 6173 Encouraging investments in affordable
homeownership unit development.
2/6 Second reading by Rules
Committee
SB 5949 Concerning the capital budget.Committee on Ways & Means
HB 2089 Concerning the capital budget.1/11 Public hearing in the House
Committee on Capital Budget
HB 1628 Increasing the supply of affordable housing by
modifying the state and local real estate excise tax.
1/8 By resolution, reintroduced
and retained in present status.
House Rules "X" file
SB 6065
Concerning the property tax exemption for cities or
counties providing affordable housing to qualifying
households.
1/9 First reading, referred to
Housing
SB 5118
Concerning modifying the multifamily property tax
exemption to promote development of long-term
affordable housing.
but no action was taken in the
Senate Committee on Ways &
Means
10
Funding Affordable Housing Continued
Bill Number Description Status
HB 1892 Concerning the workforce housing accelerator
program.
2/8 Third reading in House,
0; excused, 1
SB 6136
Reestablishing a business and occupation tax on the
privilege of providing property for rent and supporting
access to affordable rental property by exempting
from tax landlords participating in a rent stabilization
program.
1/25 Referred to Ways & Means
HB 1343 relief and preserve affordable housing in their
communities.
1/8 By resolution, reintroduced
and retained in present status
SB 5493 Limiting a business and occupation tax deduction for
financial institutions to fund affordable housing
1/8 By resolution, reintroduced
and retained in present status
HB 2219 Providing tax relief for nonprofit development of
affordable housing.
1/25 Public hearing in the House
Committee on Finance
11
Housing and Land Use
Bill Number Description Status
SB 6024 Promoting community and transit-oriented housing
development.
1/11 Public hearing in the Senate
Land Use & Tribal Affairs
HB 2160 Promoting community and transit-oriented housing
development.2/5 Referred to Rules 2 Review
SB 6015 Concerning residential parking configurations.Government
HB 2071 Concerning residential housing regulations.2/5 Referred to Rules 2 Review
12
Housing and Land Use Continued
Bill Number Description Status
HB 1998 Concerning co-living housing.
2/7 Third reading in House,
0; excused, 2
SB 5901 Concerning co-living housing.1/26 Passed to Rules Committee
for second reading
HB 2084
Establishing an oversight committee to improve
construction-related training and pathways to state
registered apprenticeships in state correctional
facilities.
2/5 Referred to Rules 2 Review
HB 1944 Establishing a running start for the trades grant
program.
1/8 First reading, referred to
Education
HB 2123 Establishing a running start for the trades grant
program.
1/8 First reading, referred to
Education
13
Housing and Land Use Continued
Bill Number Description Status
HB 1507 Concerning fair housing training for officers or board
members in common interest communities.further consideration. Placed on
third reading.
HB 2276 Increasing the supply of affordable and workforce
housing.
1/18 Public hearing in the House
Committee on Finance
SB 6191 Increasing the supply of affordable and workforce
housing.Committee on Ways & Means
HB 2113 Concerning compliance with the housing element
requirements of the growth management act.2/5 Referred to Rules 2 Review
HB 1245 Increasing housing options through lot splitting.
1/10 First reading, referred to
Local Government, Land Use &
Tribal Affairs
14
Housing and Land Use Continued
Bill Number Description Status
SB 5961
Improving housing stability for tenants subject to the
residential landlord-tenant act and the manufactured/mobile
home landlord-tenant act by limiting rent and fee increases,
requiring notice of rent and fee increases, limiting fees and
deposits, establishing a landlord resource center and
associated services, authorizing tenant lease termination,
creating parity between lease types, and providing for
attorney general enforcement.
1/26 Executive action taken in the
Senate Committee on Housing
HB 2114
Improving housing stability for tenants subject to the
residential landlord-tenant act and the manufactured/mobile
home landlord-tenant act by limiting rent and fee increases,
requiring notice of rent and fee increases, limiting fees and
deposits, establishing a landlord resource center and
associated services, authorizing tenant lease termination,
creating parity between lease types, and providing for
attorney general enforcement.
2/7 Placed on second reading by
Rules Committee
15
Questions?
16
Auburn | Burien | Covington | Des Moines | Federal Way | Kent | Maple Valley | Normandy Park | Renton | Tukwila | King County
SOUTH KING HOUSING AND
HOMELESSNESS PARTNERS
2023 Annual Progress Report. 2023 was a time of foundation building, bringing awareness about SKHHP to a
wider audience, and expanding the South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) Housing Capital Fund to fund
the creation and preservation of affordable housing in South King County. SKHHP welcomed its new Executive Manager to
the coalition in January and two member cities pooled a new funding source for the Housing Capital Fund resulting in
quadrupling funding available for affordable housing projects and doubling the number of applications received over 2022.
GOAL 1. Implement SKHHP Interlocal Agreement.
New Executive Manager – Hired and successfully onboarded new Executive Manager.
2024 Work Plan – Facilitated development and adoption of the 2024 work plan and budget.
Advisory Board – Recruited, interviewed, and appointed nine new Advisory Board members.
New Member – Presented at three City of SeaTac public meetings on becoming a member of SKHHP.
SeaTac City Council took action in January 2024 to join as SKHHP’s newest member.
GOAL 2. Build long-term sustainability for SKHHP Housing Capital Fund.
2023 Housing Capital Fund – Two member cities pooled revenues collected under HB 1590 to fund
affordable housing through the SKHHP Housing Capital Fund quadrupling funding amount available in
2023 over 2022 (from $1.4 million to $5.9 million). Received six applications for funding and the
Advisory and Executive Boards recommended fundin g four projects throughout South King County.
2022 Housing Capital Fund – Presented to eight City Councils and received concurrence on the
Executive Board’s recommendation to support two affordable housing projects in Burien.
GOAL 3. Work with partner jurisdictions to enhance and develop policies that
protect existing affordable housing and accelerate access.
Preservation Strategies – Worked closely with South King County planners (SoKiHo) on the
development of subregional affordable housing preservation strategies.
South King County Joint Planners and Developers – Hosted an open discussion with 11 developers on
reducing barriers to affordable housing development in South King County. A summary of the
discussion is available here.
Affordable Housing Inventory Dashboard – Finalized the internal tool and completed the
requirements of the Housing Action Plan and Implementation grant on behalf of five cities.
GOAL 4. Represent South King County and its affordable housing needs at all
relevant decision tables and foster collaboration between partners.
Stakeholder Collaboration – Collaborated with King County and ARCH on a joint application for HUD’s
Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing grant. Updated Congressman Smith on SKHHP’s work.
Participation in Local Meetings and Forums – Represented SKHHP at 200+ regional meetings
representing 25 unique groups. Attended four statewide forums and one national conference.
GOAL 5. Further strengthen regional stakeholders’ understanding of the spectrum
of affordable housing options and the range of related needs.
Executive Board Briefings – Coordinated six presentations to the Executive Board including on permit
accelerator programs, King County's Community Preference Program, King County Housing
Authority's preservation program, and Homestead Community Land Trust's homeownership model.
WHO WE ARE
Formed in 2019 by an
Interlocal Agreement, we
are a collaboration between
10 South King County cities
and King County united
under the common goal to
ensure the availability of
housing for all income levels
of residents in South King
County. We achieve this
through a focus on the
production and preservation
of affordable housing,
partnership with public and
private organizations,
pooling and sharing
resources, and advancing
housing policies.
PURPOSE
Create a coordinated,
comprehensive, and
equitable approach to
increasing housing stability,
reducing homelessness,
and producing and
preserving quality affordable
housing in South King
County.
CONTACT
Claire Vanessa Goodwin
Executive Manager
Website:
http://skhhp.org
Phone:
(253) 931-3042
Email:
info@skhhp.org
2
South King Housing and Homelessness Partners
Fund Status as of December 31, 2023
REVENUES OPERATING
ACTUAL
HOUSING CAPITAL FUND
CONTRIBUTIONS 2023
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE GRANT
ACTUAL
Auburn $ 34,385 $ 152,865 $ 6,556
Burien 19,838 69,897 6,556
Covington 9,919 438,028 -
Des Moines 9,919 34,301 -
Federal Way 44,965 133,558 -
Kent 44,965 4,745,112 6,556
Maple Valley 9,919 - -
Normandy Park 5,290 6,992 -
Renton 44,965 246,643 6,556
Tukwila 9,919 17,233 6,556
Unincorporated KC 44,965 - -
King County additional contribution 30,035 - -
Contributions/Donations (5,000) - -
INTEREST EARNINGS 132,093 - -
Total $ 436,177 $ 5,844,630 $ 32,779
EXPENDITURES OPERATING
ACTUAL
HOUSING CAPITAL FUND
ACTUAL
SKHHP Cost Reimbursement 337,937 -
Administration Fee 33,400 -
Total 371,337 -
Beginning Fund Balance –
January 1, 2023 296,916 1,448,075 Estimated net change in fund balance –
December 31, 2023 97,618 5,844,630 Estimated Ending Fund Balance –
December 31, 2023 394,534 7,292,705
SKHHP Cost Reimbursement Detail
EXPENDITURES
Wages 204,036
Benefits 56,156
Supplies 502
Professional Services 46,547
Interfund Allocations 30,696
Administrative fee 33,400
Total 371,337