Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-2024 Tier 1 Environmental Review HUD2011-202+ TIVI - 2nvireopa&L Rvw-0 Nub U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ' * * A 451 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20410 ��+woev+r www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov Broad --Level Tiered Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58e5 Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58.35(a) 'ri, is is a suggested format that may be used by Responsible Entities to document completion of a tiered Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5 environmental review. Proiect Information Project Name: City of Auburn Housing Repair Program Responsible Entity (RE): City of Auburn State/Local Identifier: RE Preparer: Emily Pearson Certifying Officer: Nancy Backus, Mayor Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Paint of Contact: Consultant (if applicable): Point of Contact: Project Location: Projects may be located anywhere within City of Auburn boundaries Additional Location Information: Direct Comments to: Joy Scott, Community Services Manager Description of the Proposed Project [24 CTR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CTR 1508.251: Page 1 of 5 compliance with Airport Hazards requirements. Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No This project is located in a state that does not Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as ® ❑ contain CBRS units. Therefore, this project amended by the Coastal Barrier is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 [16 Resources Act. USC 3501 Flood Insurance Yes No Will be assessed Wlhin a Tier 2 reviem, fvr Flood Disaster Protection Act of ® each project 1973 and National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR §58.5 Clean Air Yes No Based on the project description, this project Clean Air Act, amended, ® ❑ includes no activities that would require particularly section 176(c) & (d); further evaluation under the Clean Air Act. 40 CFR Parts G, 51, 93 The project is in compliance with the Clean Air Act. See project description. Coastal Zone Management Yes No Based on the project description the project Coastal Zone Management Act, ® ❑ does not include any activities that would sections 307(c) & (d) affect a Coastal Zone. The project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act. Contamination and Toxic Yes No Will be assessed within a Tier 2 reWeiv for Substances ❑ ® each project 24 CFR Part 50.3 i & 58.5(i)(2)] Endangered Species Yes No This project will have No Effect on listed Endangered Species Act 1973, ® ❑ species due to the nature of the activities particularly section 7; 50 CFR involved in the project. This project is in Part 402 compliance with the Endangered S Species p t; p Act. Explosive and Flammable Yes No All projects under this review will meet Hazards ® ❑ Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards. Farmlands Protection Yes No This project does not include any activities Farmland Protection Policy Act ® ❑ that could potentially convert agricultural of 198I, particularly sections land to a non-agricultural use. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act. Page 3 of 5 1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658 Floodplain Management Yes No The following exception applies, so the ® ❑ project is in compliance with Executive Executive Order 11988, Order 11988: 55.12(b)(2) Financial particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR assistance for minor repairs or improvements Part 55 on one- to four -family properties that do not meet the thresholds for "substantial improvement" under s. 55.2(b)(10). Historic Preservation Yes No Will be assessed u•vllhin a 71er 2 review fir ❑ ® each projecl. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Based on the project description, this project ® ❑ includes no activities that would require Noise l Act 1972, as further evaluation under HUD's noise amendeedd bby y the Quiet regulation. The project is in compliance with Communities Act of 1978; 24 HUD's Noise regulation. CFR Part 51 Subpart B Sole Source Aquifers Yes No The project will not affect Sole Source ® Aquifer quality. See Statutory Worksheet for Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, details. as amended, particularly section 1424 e ; 40 CFR Part 149 Wetlands Protection Yes No The project will not impact on- or off -site ® ❑ wetlands. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990, Executive Order 11990. particularly sections 2 and 5 Wild and Scenic Rivers This project is not within proximity of a Yes No NWSRS river. The project is in compliance Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of ® ❑ with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. 1968, particularly section 7(b) and c ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Environmental Justice Yes No No adverse environmental impacts were ® El identified in the projects Tier I broad -level Executive Order 12898 environmental review. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898. Attach supporting documentation as necessary, including a site -specific checklist. Determination: ❑ Extraordinary circumstances exist and this project may result in significant environmental impact. This project requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA); OR Page 4 of 5 ® There are no extraordinary circumstances which would require completion of an EA, and this project may remain CEST. Prepare Si nature; Date: Name/Title/Organization: Emt y Pearson, Human Services Program Coordinator, City of Auburn Responsible Entity Agency Official Signature: Date: it• Name/Title: ,Backus, Mayor, City of Auburn This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s). This document represents the Tier 1 or Broad -Level review only. As individual sites are selected, this review must be supplemented by individual Tier 2 or Site -Specific reviews for each site. All laws and authorities requiring site -specific analysis will be addressed in these individual reviews. Page 5 of 5 Airport Hazards (CEST and EA) General policy Legislation Regulation It is HUD's policy to apply standards to 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D prevent incompatible development around civil airports and military airfields. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/airport-hazards 1. To ensure compatible land use development, you must determine your site's proximity to civil and military airports. Is your project within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport? © No -> Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within the applicable distances to a military or civilian airport. El Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. 2. Is your project located within a Runway Potential Zone/Clear Zone (RPZ/CZ) or Accident Potential Zone (APZ)? ❑Yes, project is in an APZ 4 Continue to Question 3. ❑Yes, project is an RPZ/CZ 4 Project cannot proceed at this location. ® No, project is not within an APZ or RPZ/CZ 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within either zone. 3. Is the project in conformance with DOD guidelines for APZ? Dyes, project is consistent with DOD guidelines without further action. Explain how you determined that the proeect is consistent: -i Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting this determination. ❑No, the project cannot be brought into conformance with DOD guidelines and has not been approved. 4 Project cannot proceed at this location. ❑ Project is not consistent with DOD guidelines, but it has been approved by Certifying Officer or HUD Approving Official. Explain approval process: If mitigation measures have been or will be taken, explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting this determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Project served by the city's Housing Repair Program will not be located within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500.feet of a civilian airport. Projects will not be located in an RPZ or APZ. Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ® No Air Quality (CEST and EA) General Requirements Legislation Regulation The Clean Air Act is administered by the Clean Air Act (42 USC 40 CFR Parts 6, 51 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7401 et seq.) as and 93 (EPA), which sets national standards on amended particularly ambient pollutants. In addition, the Clean Section 176(c) and (d) Air Act is administered by States, which (42 USC 7506(c) and (d)) must develop State Implementation Plans (SIPS) to regulate their state air quality. Projects funded by HUD must demonstrate that they conform to the appropriate SIP. Reference https://www.hudexcha nge.info/environmental-review/air-gu'ality Scope of Work 1. Does your project include new construction or conversion of land use facilitating the development of public, commercial, or industrial facilities OR five or more dwelling units? ❑ Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. ® No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Air Quality Attainment Status of Project's County or Air Quality Management District 2. Is your project's air quality management district or county in non -attainment or maintenance status for any criteria pollutants? Follow the link below to determine compliance status of project county or air quality management district: http://www.epa.gov/oaqpsOOl/greenbk/­ 0 No, project's county or air quality management district is in attainment status for all criteria pollutants 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. ❑ Yes, project's management district or county is in non -attainment or maintenance status for one or more criteria pollutants. Describe the findings: See Tier 1 review project description. Project is minor rehabilitation for homeowner - occupied units 4 Continue to Question 3. 3. Determine the estimated emissions levels of your project for each of those criteria pollutants that are in non -attainment or maintenance status on your project area. Will your project exceed any of the de minimis or threshold emissions levels of non - attainment and maintenance level pollutants or exceed the screening levels established by the state or air quality management district? x❑ No, the project will not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions levels or screening levels 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Explain how you determined that the project would not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions. ❑ Yes, the project exceeds de minimis emissions levels or screening levels. 4. Continue to Question 4. Explain how you determined that the project would not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions in the Worksheet Summary. 4. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region See Tier 1 review project description. Project is minor rehabilitation for homeowner -occupied units. Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ❑x No Coastal Barrier Resources (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD financial assistance may not be Coastal Barrier Resources Act used for most activities in units of (CBRA) of 1982, as amended the Coastal Barrier Resources by the Coastal Barrier System (CBRS). See 16 USC 3504 for Improvement Act of 1990 (16 limitations on federal expenditures USC 3501) affecting the CBRS. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/coastal-barrier-resources Proiects located in the following states must complete this form. Alabama Georgia Massachusetts New Jersey Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Connecticut Louisiana Michigan New York Rhode Island Virginia Delaware Maine Minnesota North Carolina South Carolina Wisconsin Florida Maryland Mississippi Ohio Texas 1. Is the project located in a CBRS Unit? ❑X No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within a CBRS Unit. ❑Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. Federal assistance for most activities may not be used at this location. You must either choose an alternate site or cancel the project. In very rare cases, federal monies can be spent within CBRS units for certain exempted activities (e.g., a nature trail), after consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (see 16 USC 3505 for exceptions to limitations on expenditures). 2. Indicate your selected course of action. ❑ After consultation with the FWS the project was given approval to continue Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map and documentation of a FWS approval. ❑ Project was not given approval Proiect cannot proceed at this location. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ❑X No Coastal Zone Management Act (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Federal assistance to applicant Coastal Zone Management 15 CFR Part 930 agencies for activities affecting Act, (16 USC 1451-1464), any coastal use or resource is particularly section 307(c) granted only when such and (d) (16 USC 1456(c) and activities are consistent with (d)) federally approved State Coastal Zone Management Act Plans. References https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/coastal-zone-,management Proiects located in the followine states must complete this form. Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi . Ohio Texas Alaska Georgia Maine New Hampshire Oregon Virgin Islands. American Samona Guam Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Virginia California Hawaii Massachusetts New York Puerto Rico Washington Connecticut Illinois Michigan North Carolina Rhode Island Wisconsin Delaware, Indiana . Minnesota Northern Mariana Islands South Carolina 1. Is the project located in, or does it affect, a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Management Plan? ®Yes -i Continue to Question 2. ❑ No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within a Coastal Zone. 2. Does this project include activities that are subject to state review? ❑Yes —> Continue to Question 3. ® No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination. 3. Has this project been determined to be consistent with the State Coastal Management Program? ❑Yes, with mitigation. --> Continue to Question 4. ©Yes, without mitigation. 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination. El No, project must be canceled. Project cannot proceed at this location. 4. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. 4 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the State Coastal Management Program letter of consistency) and any other documentation used to make your determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region "Concurrence from Dept. of Ecology for Coastal Zone Management is no longer required under a Part 58 or Part 50 Environmental Review in Washington State. However, at the time of project development, the activity may trigger review if it falls under other parts of the CZMA regulations for federal agency activities (Title 15 CFR Part 930, subpart C), or consistency for activities requiring a federal license or permit (Title 15 CFR Part 930, Subpart D) and will be subject to all enforceable policies of the Coastal Zone Management Program. It is during the local permitting process that a project might be subject to CZM and further review by the Dept of Ecology." Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes © No Environmental Justice (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Determine if the project creates Executive Order 12898 adverse environmental impacts upon a low-income or minority community. If it does, engage the community in meaningful participation about mitigating the impacts or move the project. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/environmental-iustice HUD strongly encourages starting the Environmental Justice analysis only after all other laws and authorities, including Environmental Assessment factors if necessary, have been completed. 1. Were any adverse environmental impacts identified in any other compliance review portion of this project's total environmental review? El Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. ® No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. 2. Were these adverse environmental impacts disproportionately high for low-income and/or minority communities? ❑ Yes Explain: 4 Continue to Question 3. Provide any supporting documentation. • :xplain: 4 Continue to the Worksheet Summary and provide any supporting documentation. 3. All adverse impacts should be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. JMltlgation as TOIIOWS WIII oe Imwementea: 4 Continue to Question 4. ❑ No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here: 4 Continue to Question 4. 4. Describe how the affected low-income or minority community was engaged or meaningfully involved in the decision on what mitigation actions, if any, will be taken. -i Continue to the Worksheet Summary and provide any supporting documentation. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region No adverse environmental impacts were identified in the project's Tier 1 broad -level environmental review Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ® No Explosive and Flammable Hazards (CEST and EA) " General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD -assisted projects must meet N/A 24 CFR Part 51 Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Subpart C requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/explosive-and-flammable-facilities 1. Is the proposed HUD -assisted project itself the development of a hazardous facility (a facility that mainly stores, handles or processes flammable or combustible chemicals such as bulk fuel storage facilities and refineries)? ® No 4 Continue to Question 2. ❑ Yes -i Go directly to Question 5. 2. Does this project include any of the following activities: development, construction, rehabilitation that will increase residential densities, or conversion? ❑ No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ® Yes 4 Continue to Question 3. 3. Within 1 mile of the project site, are there any current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers that are covered by 24 CFR 510 Containers that are NOT covered under the regulation include: • Containers 100 gallons or less in capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OR • Containers of liquified petroleum gas (LPG) or propane with a water volume capacity of 1,000 gallons or less that meet the requirements of the 2017 version of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code 58. If all containers within the search area fit the above criteria, answer "no." For any other type of aboveground storage container within the search area that holds one of the flammable or explosive materials listed in Appendix I of 24 CFR part 51 subpart C, answer "yes." ❑ No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide all documents used to make your determination. 0 Yes Continue to Question 4. 4. Visit HUD's website to identify the appropriate tank or tanks to assess and to calculate the required separation distance using the electronic assessment tool. To document this step in the analysis, please attach the following supporting documents to this screen: • Map identifying the tank selected for assessment, and showing the distance from the tank to the proposed HUD -assisted project site; and • Electronic assessment tool calculation of the required separation distance. Based on the analysis, is the proposed HUD -assisted project site located at or beyond the required separation distance from all covered tanks? © Yes 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ❑ No 4 Go directly to Question 6. 5. Is the hazardous facility located at an acceptable separation distance from residences and any other facility or area where people may congregate or be present? Please visit HUD's website for information on calculating Acceptable Separation Distance. ❑ Yes 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide map(s) showing the location of the project site relative to residences and any other facility or area where people congregate or are present and your separation distance calculations. ❑ No --> Provide map(s) showing the location of the project site relative to residences and any other facility or area where people congregate or are present and your separation distance calculations. Continue to Question 6. 6. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Mitigation measures may include both natural and manmade barriers, modification of the project design, burial or removal of the hazard, or other engineered solutions. Describe selected mitigation measures, including the timeline for implementation, and attach an implementation plan. If negative effects cannot be mitigated, cancel the project at this location. Note that only licensed professional engineers should design and implement blast barriers. If a barrier will be used or the project will be modified to compensate for an unacceptable separation distance, provide approval from a licensed professional engineer. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Review of proposed project sites will be conducted to ensure that there are no current or planned stationary above ground storage containers that are covered by 24 CFR 51C within one mile of project sites Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes 0 No Farmlands Protection (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Farmland Protection Farmland Protection Policy, 7 CFR Part 658 Policy Act (FPPA) discourages Act of 1981(7 U.S.C. 4201 et federal activities that would seq.) convert farmland to nonagricultural purposes. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/fa rmiands-protection 1. Does your project include any activities, including new construction, acquisition of undeveloped land or conversion, that could convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use? ❑Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. ©No Explain how you determined that agricultural land would not be converted: The City of Auburn Housing Repair Program (HRP) provides eligible homeowners grants of up to $9,999 for emergency home repairs. These grants area only available to homeowners who live within the city limits of Auburn and are within the low to moderate income limits of HUD guidelines. This program enables homeowners to remain in safe, comfortable housing when they don't have the means to make needed repairs to their home. Based on the response. the review is in comnliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting your determination. 2. Does "important farmland," including prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide or local importance regulated under the Farmland Protection Policy Act, occur on the project site? You may use the links below to determine important farmland occurs on the project site: Utilize USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Web Soil Survey http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm Check with your city or county's planning department and ask them to document if the project is on land regulated by the FPPA (zoning important farmland as non- agricultural does not exempt it from FPPA requirements) Contact NRCS at the local USDA service center http:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agencv=nres or your NRCS state soil scientist http://soils.usda.gov/contact/state offices/ for assistance M No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. ❑Yes 4 Continue to Question 3. Flood Insurance (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Reference Certain types of federal financial Flood Disaster 24 CFR Flood assistance may not be used in floodplains Protection Act of 50.4(b)(1) and Insurance - unless the community participates in 1973 as 24 CFR 58.6(a) HUD Exchange National Flood Insurance Program and amended (42 and (b); 24 flood insurance is both obtained and USC 4001-4128) CFR-55.5. maintained. 1. Does this project involve mortgage insurance, refinance, acquisition, repairs, construction, or rehabilitation of a structure, mobile home, or insurable personal property? ®Yes. Provide the applicable citation at 24 CFR 55.12(c) here. If the project is exempt under 55.12 (c)(7) or (8), provide supporting documentation. - 5512. (b)(2) - Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ❑ No. Continue to Question 2. 2. Provide a FEMA/FIRM map showing the site. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designates floodplains. The FEMA Map Service Center provides this information in the form of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). For projects in areas not mapped by FEMA, use the best available information to determine floodplain information. Include documentation, including a discussion of why this is the best available information for the site. Provide FEMA/FIRM floodplain zone designation, panel number, and date within your documentation. Is the structure, part of the structure, or insurable property located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area? ❑ No Continue to the Worksheet Summary. ❑Yes Continue to Question 3. 3. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards? ❑Yes, the community is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. For loans, loan insurance or loan guarantees, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the term of the loan. For grants and other non -loan forms of financial assistance, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the life of the building irrespective of the transfer of ownership. The amount of coverage must equal the total project cost or the maximum coverage limit of the National Flood Insurance Program, whichever is less Provide a copy of the flood insurance policy declaration or a paid receipt for the current annual flood insurance premium and a copy of the application for flood insurance. Continue to the Worksheet Summary. Eyes, less than one year has passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards. If less than one year has passed since notification of Special Flood Hazards, no flood Insurance is required. Continue to the Worksheet Summary. ❑ No. The community is not participating, or its participation has been suspended. Federal assistance may not be used at this location. Cancel the proiect at this location. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Designation of a project location is determined at the Tier 2 Environmental Review level. The property location is compared to the FEMA flood plane map. Individual mitigation efforts are taken at that level. Insurance is required by the resident to proceed with work if the project location is in the FEMA flood plane area. 3. Consider alternatives to completing the project on important farmland and means of avoiding impacts to important farmland. ■ Complete form AD-1006, "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating" http://www.nres.usda.eov/Internet/FSE DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045394.pdf and contact the state soil scientist before sending it to the local NRCS District Conservationist. (NOTE: for corridor type projects, use instead form NRCS-CPA-106, "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating for Corridor Type Projects: http://www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045395.pdf.) Work with NRCS to minimize the impact of the project on the protected farmland. When you have finished with your analysis, return a copy of form AD-1006 (or form NRCS-CPA-106 if applicable) to the USDA-NRCS State Soil Scientist or his/her designee informing them of your determination. Document your conclusion: El Project will proceed with mitigation. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide form AD-1006 and all other documents used to make your determination. ❑ Project will proceed without mitigation. Explain why mitigation will not be made here: Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide form AD-1006 and all other documents used to make your determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes © No CAP Pit as:s1 Hill n I Noise (CEST Level Reviews) General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD's noise regulations protect Noise Control Act of 1972 Title 24 CFR 51 residential properties from Subpart B excessive noise exposure. HUD General Services Administration encourages mitigation as Federal Management Circular appropriate. 75-2: "Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields" References https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/noise-abatement-and- control 1. What activities does your project involve? Check all that apply: ❑ New construction for residential use NOTE: HUD assistance to new construction projects is generally prohibited if they are located in an Unacceptable zone, and HUD discourages assistance for new construction projects in Normally Unacceptable zones. See 24 CFR 51.101(a)(3) for further details. 4 Continue to Question 4. ® Rehabilitation of an existing residential property NOTE: For modernization projects in all noise zones, HUD encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. See 24 CFR 51 Subpart B for further details. —> Continue to Question 2. ❑ A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction, interstate, land sales registration, or any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provisions or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster -> Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ❑ None of the above 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. 2. Do you have standardized noise attenuation measures that apply to all modernization and/or minor rehabilitation projects, such as the use of double glazed windows or extra insulation? ❑X Yes Indicate the type of measures that will apply (check all that apply): ® Improved building envelope components (better windows and doors, strengthened sheathing, insulation, sealed gaps, etc.) ❑ Redesigned building envelope (more durable or substantial materials, increased air gap, resilient channels, staggered wall studs, etc.) ❑ Other 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below and provide any supporting documentation. ❑ No 4 Continue to Question 3. 3. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000' from a major road, 3000' from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Describe findings of the Preliminary Screening: 4 Continue to Question 6. 4. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000' from a major road, 3000' from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Indicate the findings of the Preliminary Screening below: ❑ There are no noise generators found within the threshold distances above. 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing the location of the project relative to any noise generators. ❑ Noise generators were found within the threshold distances. 4 Continue to Question 5. 5. Complete the Noise Assessment Guidelines to quantify the noise exposure. Indicate the findings of the Noise Assessment below: ❑ Acceptable: (65 decibels or less; the ceiling may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in §24 CFR 51.105(a)) Indicate noise level here: 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. ❑ Normally Unacceptable: (Above 65 decibels but not exceeding 75 decibels; the floor may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in 24 CFR 51.105(a)) Indicate noise level here: Is the project in a largely undeveloped area'? ❑ No ❑ Yes 4Your project requires completion of an Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). Elevate this review to an EA -level review. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6. Your project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). Elevate this review to an EIS -level review. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6. 1 A largely undeveloped area means the area within 2 miles of the project site is less than 50 percent developed with urban uses or does not have water and sewer capacity to serve the project. ❑ Unacceptable: (Above 75 decibels) Indicate noise level here: Your project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). You may either complete an EIS or provide a waiver signed by the appropriate authority. Indicate your choice: ❑ Convert to an EIS 4 Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6. ❑ Provide waiver -) Provide an Environmental Impact Statement waiver from the Certifying Officer or the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development per 24 CFR 51.104(b)(2) and noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6. 6. HUD strongly encourages mitigation be used to eliminate adverse noise impacts. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. This information will be automatically included in the Mitigation summary for'the environmental review. ❑ Mitigation as follows will be implemented: 4 Provide drawings, specifications, and other materials as needed to describe the project's noise mitigation measures. Continue to the Worksheet Summary. ❑ No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here: 4 Continue to the Worksheet Summary. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ® No Sole Source Aquifers (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 Safe Drinking Water 40 CFR Part 149 protects drinking water systems Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. which are the sole or principal 201, 300f et seq., and drinking water source for an area and 21 U.S.C. 349) which ,.if contaminated, would create a significant hazard to public health. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/sole-source-aquifers 1. Does your project consist solely of acquisition, leasing, or rehabilitation of an existing building(s)? ❑Yes -> Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ®No 4 Continue to Question 2. 2. Is the project located on a sole source aquifer (SSA)17 ® No -> Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination, such as a map of your project (or jurisdiction, if appropriate) in relation to the nearest SSA and its source area. ❑Yes -i Continue to Question 3. 3. Does your region have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) or other working agreement with EPA for HUD projects impacting a sole source aquifer? Contact your Field or Regional Environmental Officer or visit the HUD webpage at the link above to determine if an MOU or agreement exists in your area. ❑Yes -i Provide the MOU or agreement as part of your supporting documentation. Continue to Question 4. ®No 4 Continue to Question 5. 4. Does your MOU or working agreement exclude your project from further review? ❑Yes 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination and document where your project fits within the MOU or agreement. 1 A sole source aquifer is defined as an aquifer that supplies at least 50 percent of the drinking water consumed in the area overlying the aquifer. This includes streamflow source areas, which are upstream areas of losing streams that flow into the recharge area. ❑ No 4 Continue to Question 5. 5. Will the proposed project contaminate the aquifer and create a significant hazard to public health? Consult with your Regional EPA Office. Your consultation request should include detailed information about your proposed project and its relationship to the aquifer and associated streamflow source area. EPA will also want to know about water, storm water and waste water at the proposed project. Follow your MOU or working agreement or contact your Regional EPA office for specific information you may need to provide. EPA may request additional information if impacts to the aquifer are questionable after this information is submitted for review. © No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide your correspondence with the EPA and all documents used to make your determination. ❑Yes 4 Work with EPA to develop mitigation measures. !f mitigation measures are approved, attach correspondence with EPA and include the mitigation measures in your environmental review documents and project contracts. if EPA determines that the project continues to nose a significant risk to the aauifer. federal financial assistance must be denied. Continue to Question 6. 6. In order to continue with the project, any threat must be mitigated, and all mitigation must be approved by the EPA. Explain in detail the proposed measures that can be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. 4 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency's concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ® No Wetlands (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Executive Order 11990 discourages that direct or Executive Order 24 CFR 55.20 can indirect support of new construction impacting 11990 be used for wetlands wherever there is a practicable general guidance alternative. The Fish and Wildlife Service's National regarding the 8 Wetlands Inventory can be used as a primary Step Process. screening tool, but observed or known wetlands not indicated on NWI maps must also be processed. Off -site impacts that result in draining, impounding, or destroying wetlands must also be processed. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/wetlands-protection 1. Does this project involve new construction as defined in Executive Order 11990, expansion of a building's footprint, or ground disturbance? The term "new construction" shall include draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, and related activities and any structures or facilities begun or authorized after the effective date of the Order. ® No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ❑ Yes 4 Continue to Question 2. 2. Will the new construction or other ground disturbance impact an on- or off -site wetland? The term "wetlands" means those areas that are inundated by surface or ground water with a frequency sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances does or would support, a prevalence of vegetative or aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas such as sloughs, potholes, wet meadows, river overflows, mud flats, and natural ponds. Wetlands under E.O. 11990 include isolated and non -jurisdictional wetlands. ® No, a wetland will not be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990's definition of new construction. -� Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map or any other relevant documentation to explain your determination. ❑ Yes, there is a wetland that be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990's definition of new construction. ->You must determine that there are no practicable alternatives to wetlands development by completing the 8-Step Process. Provide a completed 8-Step Process as well as all documents used to make your determination, including a map. Be sure to include the early public notice and the final notice with your documentation. Continue to Question 3. 3. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. Which of the following mitigation actions have been or will be taken? Select all that apply: ❑ Permeable surfaces ❑ Natural landscape enhancements that maintain or restore natural hydrology through infiltration ❑ Native plant species ❑ Bioswales ❑ Evapotranspiration ❑ Stormwater capture and reuse ❑ Green or vegetative roofs with drainage provisions ❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service conservation easements ❑ Compensatory mitigation Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes ® No Q eP It ShAO64 Lal MARINA RIVERVIE DI4;.TRICT a g Dt ` jo , I --: - - , A — - T es-Mbi - THE LAKENational p' 1 or 0 I 4-� I -,'3"o4, A. 11 ,,,, ,E HL mTI�=Went Meridian SALT AIR HILLS vI" x3 *_ tWoc�monttBe!ch� - TkIDOR SQUARE Lw'j t 1%)1" - 0C4 PP' oyvin Redo ndo' p MARINE "IELS,l ' Cisphir -7Lak e Mo�on-S:ery• IAkelanctNorHl, t 1'- V Ak P F(&lrajjw Lakek'ndt-, Wynaco IV $6 R p a.L!rn Aub % N. ijY!-,0--Lake H61m J� q f3t .:��mN � Green (As Comer 41IAPLATEAU -A : l f ♦-QA tck u.,GREEN VALLEY -GREEN I v Lakeland Sod tp South b in', -4Rad iell 41 Wild and Scenic Rivers (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act The Wild and Scenic Rivers 36 CFR Part 297 ,provides federal protection for Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287), certain free -flowing, wild, scenic particularly section 7(b) and and recreational rivers (c) (16 U.S.C. 1278(b) and (c)) designated as components or potential components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) from the effects of construction or development. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/wild-and-scenic-rivers 1. Is your project within proximity of a NWSRS river as defined below? Wild &Scenic Rivers: These rivers or river segments have been designated by Congress or by states (with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior) as wild, scenic, or recreational Study Rivers: These rivers or river segments are being studied as a potential component of the Wild & Scenic River system. Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI): The National Park Service has compiled and maintains the NRI, a register of river segments that potentially qualify as national wild, scenic, or recreational river areas ® No 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination, such as a map identifying the project site and its surrounding area or a list of rivers in your region in the Screen Summary at the conclusion of this screen. ❑ Yes, the project is in proximity of a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) River. 4 Continue to Question 2. 2. Could the project do any of the following? ■ Have a direct and adverse effect within Wild and Scenic River Boundaries, ■ Invade the area or unreasonably diminish the river outside Wild and Scenic River Boundaries, or ■ Have an adverse effect on the natural, cultural, and/or recreational values of a NRI segment. Consultation with the appropriate federal/state/local/tribal Managing Agency(s) is required, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, to determine if the proposed project may have an adverse effect on a Wild & Scenic River or a Study River and, if so, to determine the appropriate avoidance or mitigation measures. Note: Concurrence may be assumed if the Managing Agency does not respond within 30 days; however, you are still obligated to avoid or mitigate adverse effects on the rivers identified in the NWSRS ® No, the Managing Agency has concurred that the proposed project will not alter, directly, or indirectly, any of the characteristics that qualifies or potentially qualifies the river for inclusion in the NWSRS. 4 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency's concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination. ❑ Yes, the Managing Agency was consulted and the proposed project may alter, directly, or indirectly, any of the characteristics that qualifies or potentially qualifies the river for inclusion in the NWSRS. 4 Continue to Question 3. 3. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. 4 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency's concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ❑ Yes © No American Car rw I ion' on ME1VI �PKA NHS Seattle Sarnmamish^ 1,I • ��.s-''III /.1 P. 71-Pi 4r l'11 (n.i llli :P', .�— i r , Cs7arra, locid •'h Preston __ . , Rrn-tor} STare Par}: y HUrien.- '.� -- -'� ,TukiaiIa` Vashon ! •' b P I i C t` -" ' Elston obart De5%i4iOlneS i Ir'c n lial•:i' "-i' iT•��.atcr`i ;k�nsi A .•' '.`,_-. _ `ir�Al r" I'.is my iSl`0lld SCa to R '�-_ -' I'ni4 4 -- P3f�: L'.i��� F't71nT i -al-Way i_p•�•wr f•. 1 Pailll,r• 1 _- - --- - i Park RiOrrSlate ' -�+4 r� half M: C•lilttl It"t: ,. ' . _ 11 _ r i i 1. pal lace._ EnumlCIA%lr —,-- —�— 1 PUybllu(j -Bonney Lake 7VOO1j�P South Hilt S'panavaay Carhonadci -- MT. 6AKER- _ SNDQUALPAtE I NATIONAL FOREST Graham __