HomeMy WebLinkAbout7006ORDINANCE NO. 7006
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING AND
DESIGNATING A PLANNED ACTION FOR THE 2024
AUBURN DOWNTOWN SUBAREA PURSUANT TO THE
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (Chapter 43.21 C of the
Revised Code of Washington (RCW)) and its implementing regulations provide for the
integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through the
designation of planned actions by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management
Act (GMA) (Chapter 36.70A RCW), including the City of Auburn; and
WHEREAS, the 2001 Auburn Downtown Plan superseded the 1987 Auburn
Downtown Plan and the 1990 Auburn Downtown Design Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan was prepared to replace
the 2001 Auburn Downtown Plan; and
WHEREAS, a subarea of the City consisting of the Downtown Subarea as
depicted on the map attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, has
been identified as a planned action area for future redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, the City, as the lead SEPA agency, issued the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Downtown Subarea Plan and Planned Action on
September 25, 2024, and after public participation and coordination with affected parties,
issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on January 22, 2025. The Draft
EIS, together with the Final'EIS, is referenced herein as the "Planned Action EIS" or "EIS";
and
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 1 of 17
Rev. 2024
WHEREAS, the EIS identifies the impacts and mitigation measures associated
with planned development in the Study Area; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS identifies
impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the Downtown
Subarea; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to designate a Planned Action for its Downtown
Subarea, and to mitigate development consistent with procedures and criteria contained
in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations which will help protect
the environment, and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted design standards which will guide the form, bulk,
scale, and quality of development; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan guides the allocation of
jobs and housing units projected for the Downtown Subarea; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Procedures, Auburn City Code
(ACC) 16.06.085 provides for Planned Actions with the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds as follows:
A. The City is subject to the requirements of the GMA (Chapter 36.70A
RCW) and is applying Planned Action to an Urban Growth Area (UGA).
B. The procedural requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW have been
complied with.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 2 of 17
Rev. 2024
C. The procedural and substantive requirements of SEPA (Chapter 43.21 C
RCW) have been complied with.
D. The City has an adopted Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA
and is replacing the 2001 Auburn Downtown Plan with the 2024 Auburn
Downtown Subarea Plan.
E. An EIS has been prepared for the Planned Action Area and the City
Council finds that the EIS adequately identifies and addresses the
probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and
amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned
Action Area.
F. The 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS,
together with adopted City development and environmental regulations,
will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the
Planned Action Area.
G. The regulation of land and development is subject to the authority and
general police power of the City, and the City reserves its powers and
authority to appropriately amend, modify, and revise such land use
controls in accordance with applicable law.
H. The 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan and EIS identify the location,
type, and amount of development contemplated by the Planned Action.
I. Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47.06.140 are excluded from
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 3 of 17
the Planned Action and are not eligible for review or permitting as
Rev. 2024
Planned Action Projects unless they are an accessory to or part of a
project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action.
J. The Planned Action is located entirely within a UGA and applies to a
defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundary.
K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed
Planned Action with implementation of the City's adopted Engineering
Design Standards and the Comprehensive System Plans.
L. The City has provided several opportunities for meaningful public
involvement in the 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan and EIS
including a community meeting consistent with RCW 43.21 C.440, and
has considered all comments received, and, as appropriate, has
modified the proposal or mitigation measures.
M. Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action
EIS and mitigation measures will protect the environment, benefit the
public, and enhance economic development.
Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to:
A. Combine environmental analysis, land use plans, development
regulations, and City codes and ordinances together with the mitigation
measures in the Planned Action EIS to mitigate environmental impacts
and process Planned Action development applications in the Planned
Action Area;
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 4 of 17
Rev. 2024
B. Designate the Downtown Subarea, shown in Exhibit A, as a Planned
Action Area for purposes of environmental review and permitting of
designated Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440;
C. Confirm that the Planned Action EIS meets the requirements of a
planned action EIS pursuant to SEPA;
D. Establish criteria and procedures for the designation of certain projects
within the Planned Action Area as Planned Action Projects consistent
with RCW 43.21 C.440;
E. Provide clear definition as to what constitutes a Planned Action Project
within the Planned Action Area, identify the criteria for Planned Action
Project approval, and determine how development project applications
that qualify as Planned Action Projects will be processed by the City;
F. Acknowledge that where the boundary of the Planned Action Area
overlaps with other adopted subarea plans, the 2024 Auburn Downtown
Subarea Plan and associated development regulations govern;
G. Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process by relying
on the Downtown Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS; and
H. Apply the mitigation contained in this Ordinance for the processing of
Planned Action Project applications and incorporate the applicable
mitigation measures into the underlying project permit conditions in
order to address the impacts of future development contemplated by this
Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 5 of 17
Rev. 2024
Section 3. Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining
Planned Action Projects within Planned Action Area.
A. Planned Action Area. This Planned Action designation shall apply to
the area shown in Exhibit A of this Ordinance.
B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action Project determination for
a site -specific project application within the Planned Action Area shall
be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action
EIS. The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B of this Ordinance
are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along
with adopted City regulations, provide the framework the City will apply
appropriate conditions on qualifying Planned Action Projects within the
Planned Action Area.
C. Planned Action Designated. Land Uses and activities described in the
Planned Action EIS, subject to the standards (thresholds) of Subsection
3.D of this Ordinance and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit
B of this Ordinance, are designated Planned Action Projects pursuant to
RCW 43.21 C.440. A development application for a site -specific project
located within the Planned Action Areas that meets the criteria in
Subsection ID and 3.E may be designated a Planned Action Project
pursuant to the process in Subsection 3.1.
D. Planned Action Thresholds/Qualifications. The following standards
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 6 of 17
shall be used to determine if a site -specific development proposed within
the Planned Action Area was contemplated as a Planned Action Project
Rev. 2024
and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action
EIS:
a. Qualifying Land Uses.
i. The following general types of land uses are considered
Planned Actions:
1. Single -unit detached housing and middle housing;
2. Multi -family housing (apartments and co -living
housing);
3. Mixed -use (vertical or horizontal);
4. Retail, commercial, office, services;
5. Restaurants and bars;
6. Craft industry/light industrial, small food production;
7. Arts/entertainment (gallery, theater, fine arts
studios);
8. Medical offices and hospital;
9. Open space, passive or active parks, trails,
recreation;
10. Civic, cultural, government, and utility facilities as
identified in the Plan and allowed in the Auburn
Zoning Code;
11. Uses allowed in the Zoning Code provided for each
implementing district (Chapter 18.29 DUC);
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 7 of 17 Rev. 2024
12.Other uses applicable to the 2024 Auburn
Downtown Subarea Plan that are similar to uses
listed above as determined by the Community
Development Director or designee;
13. Multi -modal transportation improvements
consistent with the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan and the Planned Action EIS; and
14. Enlargement or intensification of uses existing at
the time the Planned Action Area is approved, so
long as such enlargement or intensification
complies with the Zoning Code to the extent
practical.
ii. Planned Action Uses: A land use shall qualify as a Planned
Action Project land use when:
1. It is within the Planned Action area as shown in
Exhibit A of this Ordinance; and
2. It is within one or more of the land use categories
described above; or
3. It is a common accessory use or appurtenance to a
permitted use.
iii. A Planned Action Project may be a single Planned Action
land use, or a combination of Planned Action land uses in
a mixed -use development.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 8 of 17 Rev. 2024
b. Development Thresholds.
i. Land Use: The following amount of new various land uses
are contemplated by the Planned Action:
Table 1. Comparison of Alternatives.
Total
Housing
Population
Jobs
Total
Activity
Acres
Units
Activity
Units/Acre
Units
Alternative 1 - No Action (2044
361
4,257
8,781
` 6,302
15,083
41.5 ".
Projection)
Alternative 2 - Moderate Growth (2044
361
7,006
14,284
7,698
21,982
58.5
Projection)
..................................... ....................................................... ............ .................. ........................ ........ ..................
........................... ..:.....
....................... ..........................
............................
....
.........................
Alternative 3 - Higher Growth (2044
361 ...
7,603; '.
15,478
8,185
23;663
62._9 _:
..Projection)..:
Table 2. Planned Action Development Limits: 2024 — 2044: Preferred Alternative.
Current (2021) Preferred Alternative (2044)
Jobs Po ulation _ Housing,,,,,Jobs Po ulation Housin
_.__..._.__.P._.._ . _.___...._ ..:.__ .P_.. _.._ °_____. _._g._:.:
Revised Downtown Area 4,799 3,708 1,724 8,185 15,478 7,603
................................... ... .... .......... _.................................... ............... ._....... ......................................................................... ...................... ............................... _.......... ...._................ I ............. ................. ............. ....... ................... ...._............................................................... ... .
Table 3. Net New Development: Preferred Alternative.
Net Jobs Net Population Net Housing
n.,`,_::.�...�.,o.��n.._,....,.........,.,.a�.�,<,„�..-b.,..a..�_v.o�,p.,.,�-,>.,......,.,�,>.,,�.�..,���.,:�.<_.
Revised Downtown Area: ; :,: 3,386 11,770 58.79
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 9 of 17
ii. Shifting development amounts between land use identified
in Subsection 3.D.b.i may be permitted provided the
transportation thresholds are not exceeded and the
Rev. 2024
development impacts identified in the Planned Action EIS
are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B.
iii. Further environmental review maybe required pursuant to
WAC 197-11-172, if any individual Planned Action Project
or combination of Planned Action Projects exceed the
development thresholds specified in this Ordinance and/or
alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action
EIS.
c. Transportation Thresholds.
i. Level of Service Threshold. The City uses an LOS rating
system to evaluate the operations of its roadway system.
LOS is a concept used to describe traffic operations from
the driver's perspective. LOS ratings are defined by
intersection delay in seconds—LOS ranges from LOS A,
which signifies no congestion and little delay, to LOS F,
which signifies substantial congestion and delay. All
intersections currently meet the City's minimum LOS
standards. One intersection does not meet the City's
minimum LOS standards: C Street NW & 3rd Street NW—
LOS F. This intersection is currently identified in the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan and 6-Year
Transportation Improvement Plan for future mitigation.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 10 of 17 Rev. 2024
ii. Concurrency. All Planned Action Projects shall meet the
City's transportation concurrency requirement standards
and the level of service thresholds according to the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Engineering
Design Standards. Applicants shall be required to
document that the project meets concurrency standards.
iii. Impact Fee. In order to mitigate transportation related
impacts, all Planned Action Projects shall pay impact fees,
with adjustments made for any applicable credits.
iv. Mitigation. Each Planned Action Project shall provide its
proportionate share of transportation capital
improvements analyzed in the Planned Action EIS. The
City Engineer shall have the discretion to adjust the
allocation of responsibility for required improvements
between individual Planned Action Projects based on their
identified impacts.
v. Discretion. The City Engineer shall have discretion to
determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent
with Chapter 19.04 ACC for each Planned Action Project
proposed under this Planned Action.
E. Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts. A Planned
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 11 of 17
Action Project that would result in a significant change in the type or
degree of adverse impacts to any element(s) of the environment
Rev. 2024
analyzed in the Planned Action EIS will not qualify as a Planned Action
Project.
F. Changed Conditions. Should environmental conditions change
significantly from those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's
SEPA Responsible Official or designee may determine that the Planned
Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental
environmental review is conducted.
G. Planned Action Review Criteria. The City's SEPA Responsible Official
or designee may designate projects as "Planned Action Projects",
pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.030, applications that meet the following
conditions:
a. The proposal is located within the Planned Action Area identified
in Exhibit A of this Ordinance.
b. The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those
described in the Planned Action EIS and Subsection ID of this
Ordinance.
c. The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other
criteria of Subsection 3.D. of this Ordinance.
d. The proposal is consistent with the Auburn Comprehensive Plan
and the 2024 Auburn Downtown Subarea Plan.
e. The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have
been identified in the Planned Action EIS.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 12 of 17
Rev. 2024
f. The project's significant impacts will be mitigated by application
of the measures identified in Exhibit B of this Ordinance and other
applicable City regulations, together with any conditions,
modifications, variances, design review, or special permit that
may be required.
g. The project complies with all applicable local, state, and/or
federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official
or designee determines that these laws and regulations
constitute adequate mitigation.
h. The project is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW
36.70A.200 unless the essential public facility is an accessory to
or part of a development that is designated as a Planned Action
Project under this Ordinance.
H. Effect of Planned Action. Designation as a Planned Action Project by
the City's SEPA Responsible Official or designee means that a
qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this
Ordinance and found to be consistent with the development parameters
and thresholds established herein and with the environmental analysis
contained in the Planned Action EIS.
I. Planned Action Project Permit Process. Applications for Planned
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 13 of 17
Action Projects shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process:
Rev. 2024
a. Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements
of the Auburn Municipal Code and this Ordinance in place at the
time of the Planned Action Project application.
b. Applications for Planned Action Projects shall:
i. Be made on forms provided by the City;
ii. Include the SEPA checklist in WAC 197-11; and
iii. Meet all applicable requirements of the Auburn Municipal
Code and this Ordinance.
c. The City's SEPA Responsible Official or designee shall
determine whether the application is complete as provided in Title
14 ACC.
d. If the application for a project within the Planned Action Area as
defined in Exhibit A, then the application will be reviewed to
determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and
thereby qualifies as a Planned Action Project.
e. The decision of the City's SEPA Responsible Official or designee
determining if a project is a Planned Action Project is a Type 1
decision. The City's SEPA Responsible Official or designee shall
notify the applicant of their decision in writing to the applicant or
project representative, as listed on the application, and federally
recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over
the Planned Action Project pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 14 of 17 Rev. 2024
f. If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action Project,
it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review
procedures specified in Title 14 ACC, except that no SEPA
threshold determination, EIS, or additional SEPA review shall be
required.
g. Notice of application for a Planned Action Project shall be
consistent with Title 14 ACC.
h. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice
shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action
Project. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying
permit, no special notice is required by this Ordinance.
i. To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the
City or applicant may request consideration and execution of a
development agreement for a Planned Action Project, consistent
with RCW 36.70B.170.
j. If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action
Project, the City SEPA Responsible Official or designee shall
notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure
consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and requirements of
state law. The notice shall describe the elements of the
application that result in failure.to qualify as a Planned Action
Project.
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 15 of 17 Rev. 2024
k. Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Action Projects may
incorporate or otherwise use elements of the Planned Action EIS,
as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA
requirements. The City SEPA Responsible Official or designee
may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non -qualifying project
to those issues and environmental impacts not previously
addressed in the Planned Action EIS.
Section 4. Monitoring and Review.
A. The City should monitor the progress of development in the designated
Planned Action Area as deemed appropriate to ensure that it is
consistent with the assumption of this Ordinance and the Planned Action
EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated
impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned
for the Planned Action Area.
B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than eight (8)
years from its effective date. The review shall determine the continuing
relevance of the Planned Action Area, the impacts of development, and
required mitigation measures. Based on this review, the City may
propose amendments to this Ordinance or may supplement or revise the
Planned Action EIS.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
--------------------------------
Ordinance No. 7006
December 15, 2025
Page 16 of 17
Rev. 2024
EXHIBIT A: PLANNED ACTION AREA)
,
7 Jr
j;6
si+asarN
-�
i
Ojai
� s �'; ¢ t rtf1 s;.,.
3 e'7I'S`; •� �t -.
� l,#
,
� N� '�a 11;
}
T
.� 1
1 ,
DOWNTOWN SUBAREA PLAN DISTRICTS DUC - C-1 Light Commercial
ORD. NO. 7006 DUC - M-1 Light Industrial Printed On: 10/3/2025
DUC - Core 125 DUC - NR Neighborhood Residential
= DUC - Core 75 Map ID: 6352
Planned Action Area Information shown is for DUC - FR Flex -Residential general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
!� DUC - Health & Wellness 125 represent exact geographic or cartographic
DUC - C-2 Heavy Commercial data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes
no warranty as to its accuracy.
Exhibit B Mitigation Measures
Ordinance No. 7006
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for a project
and non -project proposals that are likely to have adverse impacts to the environment. In
order to meet EPA requirements, the City of Auburn issued the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Downtown Subarea Plan and Planned Action on
September 25, 2024 and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on January
22, 2025. The Draft EIS, together with the Final EIS, is referenced herein as the "EIS".
The EIS has identified significant beneficial and adverse impacts that are anticipated to
occur with the future development of the Planned Action area, together with a number of
possible measures to mitigate those significant adverse impacts. The purpose of this
Mitigation Measures Document is to establish specific mitigation measures to be
considered for each Planned Action Project, based upon the significant adverse impacts
identified in the EIS. The mitigation measures shall apply to future development proposals
which are consistent with the Planned Action scenarios reviewed in the EIS, and which
are located within the Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A).
SEPA TERMS
As used in this document, the words "action", "planned action", or "proposal" are defined
as described below.
Ordinance No. 7006
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 5
"Action" means projects or programs financed, licensed, regulated, conducted or
approved by a governmental Agency. "Project actions" involve decisions on a specific
project such as a construction or management activity for a defined geographic area.
"Non -project" actions involve decisions about policies, plans or programs (see WAC 197-
11-704).
"Planned Action" refers to types of project actions that are designated by ordinance for a
specific geographic area and addressed in an EIS, in conjunction with a comprehensive
plan or subarea plan, a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master
planned development or phased project (see WAC 197-11-164).
"Proposal" means proposed action that may be an action and regulatory decision of an
agency, or any action proposed by applicants (see WAC 197-11-784).
GENERAL INTERPRETATION
Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall' or "will," inclusion of that measure
in project plans is mandatory in order to qualify a project as a Planned Action Project.
Where "should" or "would" appear, the mitigation measure may be considered by the
project applicant as a source of additional mitigation, as feasible or necessary, to ensure
that a project qualifies as a Planned Action.
Unless stated specifically otherwise, mitigation measures that require preparation of
plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance
activities, etc., are the responsibility of the applicant or designee to fund and or perform.
Ordinance No. 7006
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 5
MITIGATION
Mitigation measures identified in the EIS are reiterated here for inclusion in proposed
projects to mitigate related impacts and to qualify as Planned Action Projects.
Consistency review under the Planned Action, development plan review, and other permit
approvals will be required for specific development actions under the Proposed Action
pursuant to WAC 197-11-172. Additional project conditions may be imposed on planned
action projects based upon the analysis of the proposal in relationship to independent
requirements of the City, state or federal requirements or review criteria.
Any applicant for a project within the Planned Action Area may propose alternative
mitigation measures, if appropriate or as a result of changed circumstances, in order to
allow equivalent substitute mitigation for identified impacts. Such modifications shall be
evaluated by the City's SEPA Responsible Official or designee prior to any project
approvals by the City.
In combination, regulations applicable to each element of the environment and mitigation
measures identified in the EIS and documented in this Mitigation Measures Document
that are applied to any planned action proposal will adequately mitigate all significant
environmental impacts associated with planned action proposals, except for those
impacts that are identified as "significant unavoidable adverse impacts." Mitigation
measures are identified in the section below.
POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING
Ordinance No. 7006
Exhibit B
Page 3of5
1. Planned Action Projects are subject to regulations applied to existing development
and uses in the subarea plan including but not limited to proportional compliance
intended to allow existing development and progress towards the Subarea Plan
vision and zoning intent.
LAND USE AND AESTHETICS
2. Planned Action Projects shall be consistent with Subarea Plan, architectural and
site design standards, zoning development standards, subdivisions standards, and
the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Planned Action Projects shall be conditioned to be consistent with Inadvertent
Human Remains Discovery Language recommended by the State of Washington
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation as a condition of project
approval consistent with RCWs 68.50.645, 27.44.055, and 68.60.055.
4. Planned Action Projects shall demonstrate consistency with crime prevention
through environmental design principles through compliance with sub area plan
development standards and guidelines.
TRANSPORTATION
5. Planned Action Projects shall be consistent with the Engineering Construction
Standards, Engineering Design Standards, the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan, and any other applicable code provisions.
Ordinance No. 7006
Exhibit B
Page 4 of 5
6. Planned Action Projects shall implement required street frontages consistent with
the Subarea Plan, architectural and site design standard, and the Engineering
Design Standards.
UTILITIES
7. Planned Action Projects shall be consistent with the Engineering Construction
Standards, Engineering Design Standards, the Comprehensive Plan, and any
other applicable code provisions.
8. Planned Action Projects shall meet City standards for adequate water and sewer
service, pay applicable general facility charges, and incorporate water and sewer
infrastructure improvements in street frontage improvements as appropriate.
9. Planned Action Projects shall implement the required current Department of
Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
and City of Auburn Surface Water Management Manual (SWMM), which is the
City's supplemental manual to the SWMMWW, for necessary stormwater
improvements.
Ordinance No. 7006
Exhibit B
Page 5of5