Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIV.B Environmental District Memorandum TO: Planning and Community Development Committee FROM: Kevin Snyder, AICP, Assistant Director CC Cindy Baker, AICP, Director Jeff Dixon, Principal Planner Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Principal Planner Kelly McLain Aardal, Environmental Protection Manager Jennifer Shih, Environmental Planner Dennis Dowdy, P.E., Public Works Director Dennis Selle, P.E., City Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director Ingrid Gaub, P.E. Assistant City Engineer DATE: February 23, 2009 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION: Potential Amendments to Maximum Lot Coverage Requirements for 18.33 (Environmental Park) At the Committee’s January 26, 2009 meeting, the Committee requested staff to revise the draft amendments discussed at the meeting pertaining to potential revisions to the current 35 percent maximum lot coverage standard specified in ACC 18.33.040.D. Specifically, the Committee requested staff conduct the following key revisions: th Revise the allowed increase in maximum lot coverage as presented at the January 26 meeting to an incentive orientation rather than a prescriptive orientation using percentage incremental increase incremental increase approach and create a corresponding table; Add the construction and use of “green roofs” as a low impact development method and include as an incentive method; and, Clarify the reference to LEED rated green building methods to specify a Silver level rating in accordance with the different LEED rating systems prepared by the United States Green Building Council. Please find attached for Committee review and discussion the revisions to ACC 18.33.040 (Development Standards) and ACC 18.33.050 (Supplemental Development Standards) based on the input and direction th provided by the Planning and Community Development Committee at its January 26 meeting. For purposes of clarification, please be advised that staff has used the following technical editing techniques to explain proposed revisions: Strikethough: Words that have been struck are indicated using strike-through – i.e. word th Underlined and Yellow Highlighted: Words that are new subsequent to the January 26 meeting are indicated using underlining and yellow highlighting – i.e. word rd During the Committee’s discussion of the potential draft amendments at its February 23 meeting, staff would like to discuss the following questions: 1.Do the changes from the previously prescriptive orientation to an incentive based orientation accurately represent the Committee’s direction? 2.To confirm, does the Committee want to use the LEED Silver rating designation as it applies to green building construction methods? Please find attached more information on the LEED rating system as it applies to the different types of construction presented in the proposed amendments 3.Does the Committee want to proceed forward with proposed changes to ACC 18.33.040 and ACC 18.33.050 at this time or does the Committee have additional questions or information needs that it wants staff to research and report back on at its next meeting? Please be advised that staff is currently preparing graphical representations of the application of different rd maximum lot coverage standards for the Committee’s use in its discussion at the February 23 meeting and will present these representations prior to or at the meeting. 2 DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY – SUBJECT TO CHANGE 18.33.040 Development standards. Development standards in an environmental park district are as follows: A. Minimum lot area: none required; B. Minimum lot width: none required; C. Minimum lot depth: none required; D. Maximum lot coverage: 5035 percent, provided that the maximum lot coverage may be increased to a maximum of 75 percent if compliance to ACC 18.33.050.F can be achieved. E. Maximum building height: 35 feet; F. Minimum yard setbacks: 1. Front: 20 feet; 2. Side, interior: 15 feet; 3. Side, street: 20 feet; 4. Rear: 20 feet; An additional 30-foot setback shall be required if adjacent to or separated by a street less than 50 feet in width of any residentially zoned property; G. Fences and Hedges. Fences shall be decorative and relate architecturally to the associated building. Acceptable materials are brick, wood, stone, metal, or textured concrete. Colored chain link fences may be allowed subject to the planning, building and community director's approval. Barbed wire or razor wire fences are not permitted. For further information see Chapter 18.48 ACC. The provisions of this section shall not apply to temporary fences required for construction projects permitted by the city; H. Parking: see Chapter 18.52 ACC; I. Landscaping: see Chapter 18.50 ACC; J. Signs: see Chapter 18.56 ACC; K. Performance standards: see Chapter 18.58 ACC. (Ord. 6036 § 10, 2006.) 18.33.050 Supplemental development standards. Supplemental development standards in an environmental park district are as follows: A. All activities shall be conducted entirely within a building except as follows: 1. Horticulture activities. 2. Outdoor storage associated with light manufacturing uses pursuant to ACC 18.33.020(K). 3. Refuse containers, provided they are screened from adjoining property and public or private right-of-way with a masonry fence and a five-foot width Type III landscaping. 4. Uses listed as requiring a conditional use permit which require some outdoor activity or display. B. All odors, noise, vibrations, heat, glare, or other emissions are controlled within the confines of a building. C. Loading and unloading docks shall not be visible from the street. D. Mechanical equipment on rooftops shall be sited and designed to minimize noise and effectively screen the equipment from view from adjacent properties and rights-of- way. The following methods, or a combination thereof, may be used: 1. Set back from the roof edge to obscure visibility from below; City of Auburn Planning & Community Development Committee Meeting February 23, 2009 Review Copy – Version 2 Page 1 DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY – SUBJECT TO CHANGE 2. Integration into the building architecture, using building walls, roof wells or roof parapets to conceal the equipment; 3. Equipment enclosure or sight-obscuring fencing or landscaping; 4. Overhead trellis or roof to obscure visibility from above. Materials used to screen mechanical equipment shall be the same as or compatible with the design of the principal structure. E. No on-site hazardous substance processing and handling, or hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, shall be permitted, unless clearly incidental and secondary to a permitted use. On-site hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities are prohibited. (Ord. 6036 § 10, 2006.) F. The Director or designee may approve incremental an increases in the maximum lot coverage standard from 50 percent up to a maximum of to 75 percent for a project if compliance to one or more of the following low impact development or green building methods subsections can be demonstrated: Table 18.33050-1 DescriptionIncremental Percent Increase in Maximum Lot Coverage Low Impact Development Methods: Use of native and drought resistant vegetation 1% Limitation of on-site parking spaces to one hundred (100) percent of the 2% required parking Minimal excavation foundations composed of driven piles and a 2% connector at or above grade to reduce soil excavation and compaction Construction and use of green roof systems incorporating man-made 2% features (e.g. solar panels) or natural features (vegetative plants) or both Construction and use of pervious pavement composed of concrete or 2% asphalt or pavers or grid systems filled with grass or gravel Soil amendments to areas disturbed during the construction process2% Construction and use of rain gardens (also referred to as bio-retention 2% cells) Retention and incorporation of existing topographic site features that 2% slow, store and infiltrate storwmater Construction and use of hydrologically rough on-site landscape that slow 2% storm flows and design features that slows storm flows and increases the amount of time storm flows stay on the site Construction and use of rooftop rainwater harvesting comprised of 2% catchment or cistern systems that collect rooftop runoff for irrigation, grey water or other non-potable water purposes City of Auburn Planning & Community Development Committee Meeting February 23, 2009 Review Copy – Version 2 Page 2 DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY – SUBJECT TO CHANGE DescriptionIncremental Percent Increase in Maximum Lot Coverage Other low impact development methods proposed by the applicant that 2% the Director or designee determine are appropriate to the site and type of development that have been substantiated by appropriate written and plan documentation and are deemed by the Director or designee Subtotal of Incremental Percent Increase in Maximum Lot Coverage 71% Green Building Construction Methods: Green building design guidelines and principles specified in the United 4% States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Efficiency ® Design (LEED) Rating System appropriate to the type and extent of construction, provided that certification of a structure through the LEED system shall not be required. New construction and major renovations of existing buildings shall be designed in accordance with one or more of the following LEED rating programs: Silver Rated LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations a. Silver Rated LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & b. Maintenance Silver Rated LEED for Commercial Interiors c. Silver LEED For Core and Shell d. Grand Total of Incremental Percent Increase in Maximum Lot Coverage75% 1. Low Impact Development Methods. An applicant shall submit written information and plans as specified on forms provided by the City for use of one or more of the low impact development methods specified in Table 18.33.050-1 prior to the submittal of a complete building permit. The Director or designee shall consult with the City Engineer, City Building Official, and other qualified internal and external parties as may be deemed relevant to determine the adequacy and appropriateness of the proposed low impact development techniques. Approved low impact development techniques shall be constructed, inspected and approved by the City prior to receipt of final occupancy permit or other final City approval, as appropriate. Adevelopmentproject seeking to increase its maximum lot coverage to 75 percent shall incorporate all of the following low impact development methods, unless otherwise excepted by the Director or designee based on written professional justification. Any exception to the implementation of these methods mayonly be authorized by the Director or designee following submittal of written evidence by a registered professional engineer in the State of Washington demonstrating that implementation of a particular method is impractical based on topographic features or soil composition. In those instances where site conditions make application of all of these methods impractical, the Director or designee shall specify the most appropriate City of Auburn Planning & Community Development Committee Meeting February 23, 2009 Review Copy – Version 2 Page 3 DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY – SUBJECT TO CHANGE method (s) to be used. In no instance, shall a development project be completely waived from incorporating low impact development methods: Minimal excavation foundations composed of driven piles and a connector at or a. above grade to reduce soil excavation and compaction. Construction and use of pervious pavement composed of concrete or asphalt or b. pavers or grid systems filled with grass or gravel. Soil amendments to areas disturbed during the construction process. c. Construction and use of rain gardens (also referred to as bio-retention cells). d. Retention and incorporation of existing topographic site features that slow, store e. and infiltrate storwmater. Constructionand use of hydrologically rough on-site landscape that slowstorm f. flows and design features that slows storm flows and increases the amount of time storm flows stay on the site. Construction and use of rooftop rainwater harvesting comprised of catchment or g. cistern systems that collect rooftop runoff for irrigation, grey water or other non- potable water purposes. Limitation of on-site parking spaces to one hundred twenty-five (125) percent of h. the required parking. Native vegetation shall be used and non-native vegetation shall be prohibited. i. Other low impact development methods proposed by the applicant that the j. Director or designee determineare appropriate to the site and type of development that have been substantiated by appropriate written and plan documentation and are deemed by the Director or designee 2.Green Building Construction Methods. An applicant shall submit written information and plans as specified on forms provided by the City for use of one or more of the green building construction methods specified in Table 18.33.050-1 prior to the submittal of a complete building permit. The Director or designee shall consult with the City Engineer, City Building Official, and other qualified internal and external parties as may be deemed relevant to determine the adequacy and appropriateness of the proposed low impact development techniques. Approved low impact development techniques shall be constructed, inspected and approved by the City prior to receipt of final occupancy permit or other final City approval, as appropriate. Adevelopmentproject seeking to increase its maximum lot coverage to 75 percent shallincorporate design guidelines and principles specified in the United States Green ® Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Efficiency Design (LEED) Rating System appropriate to the type and extent of construction, provided that certification of a structure through the LEED system shall not be required. New construction and major renovations of existing buildings shall be designed in accordance with one or more of the following LEED programs: a.LEEDforNew Construction b.LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance c.LEED for Commercial Interiors d.LEED For Core and Shell City of Auburn Planning & Community Development Committee Meeting February 23, 2009 Review Copy – Version 2 Page 4 DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY – SUBJECT TO CHANGE An applicant shall submit a written proposalon forms provided by the City foruse of one or more of the LEED rated programs specified above prior to the submittal of a complete building permit. The Director or designee shall consult with the City Building Official, and other qualified internal and external parties as may be deemed relevant to determine the adequacy and appropriateness of the proposed LEED program (s). For the purposes of this Section, major renovations shall be defined as the construction of an addition to an existing structure that is 7,500 square feet or greater in size or the entire replacement or upgrade of mechanical equipment or plumbing equipment or heating and ventilation equipment. Green building methods as specified above shall be required, unless otherwise excepted by the Director or designee based on written professional justification. Any exceptionto the implementation of these methods may only be authorized by the Director or designee following submittal of written or plan evidence by a registered professionalarchitect in the State of Washington demonstrating that implementation of a particular method is impractical based on site configuration, topographic features or soil composition. In those instances where one or more site conditions make application of all of these methods impractical, the Director or designee shall specify the most appropriate method (s) to be used. In no instance, shall a development project be completely waived from incorporating green building methods. City of Auburn Planning & Community Development Committee Meeting February 23, 2009 Review Copy – Version 2 Page 5 LEED RATING SYSTEM – BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System™ began in 1998 and was developed by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), a non-profit organization that promotes sustainable building practices. LEED addresses different types of construction and is comprised of a hierarchy of different ratings that are based on the use and incorporation of different green building techniques at all different levels of a project. LEED has four major rating classifications with each classification requiring a higher level usage and incorporation of building techniques in order to qualify for. Rating are achieved through the accumulation of the required number of rating points needed for the application of each rating classification: Certified Silver Gold Platinum LEED certification is conducted through independent, third-party verification that a building project meets the highest green building and performance measures relative to the rating level being sought. For the purposes of the potential amendments to Chapter 18.33 (Environmental Park), the types of construction for which the LEED design guidelines and principles could be applied include: a) New Construction and Major Renovation; Existing Buildings – Operation and Maintenance; c) Commercial Interiors; and d) Core and Shell. The following explains the current rating systems and associated required rating points: LEEDNCMR FOR EWONSTRUCTION AND AJORENOVATIONS Required Points Rating Certified 26-32 Points Silver33-38 Points Gold39-51 Points Platinum 52-69 Points LEEDEB:O&M FOR XISTING UILDINGSPERATIONS AINTENANCE Required Points Rating Certified 34-42 Points Silver43-50 Points Gold51-67 Points Platinum 68-92 Points LEEDCI FOR OMMERCIALNTERIORS Required Points Rating Certified 21-26 Points Silver27-31 Points Gold32-41 Points Platinum 42-57 Points LEEDFCS ORORE AND HELL Required Points Rating Certified 23-27 Points Silver28-33 Points Gold34-44 Points Platinum 45-61 Points