HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM VIII-A-3
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda SubjectDate:
Ordinance No. 5960 October 28, 2005
Department:Attachments:Budget Impact:
Planning See exhibit list below
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 5960.
Exhibit List
Exhibit 1 Ordinance No. 5960
Exhibit 2 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (SEP04-0033), dated 7-20-05
Exhibit 3 Hearing Examiner Recommendation on the Rezone, dated 9-14-05
Exhibit 4 Request for Reconsideration filed by Jane Ryan Kohler on behalf of Frary Breckenridge,
dated 9-28-05
Exhibit 5 Applicant’s response (Hans Korve) to Request for Reconsideration, dated 10-11-05
Exhibit 6 Hearing Examiner Decision on Reconsideration, dated 10-11-05
Exhibit 7 Staff Request for Clarification of the Hearing Examiner Decision on Reconsideration,
dated 10-12-05
Exhibit 8 Hearing Examiner Decision on Clarification of the Reconsideration, dated 10-21-05
The other exhibits that were considered by the Hearing Examiner are listed at pages 2 through 3 of the
Hearing Examiner’s written recommendation. These exhibits are available for review or may be
requested by contacting the Planning Department.
Background Summary:
The Hearing Examiner on August 16, 2005 conducted an open record hearing on the request of Monte
Adams, for rezoning of 13.14 acres from RR (Rural Residential) and RMHP (Residential Mobile Home
Park) to R3 (Duplex Residential). The majority of the parcel is currently designated RR (Rural
Residential) (the western approximately 12.62 acres) while the portion zoned RMHP (Residential Mobile
Home Park) is limited to the extreme northeastern corner (approximately 0.52 acres) where the access
road to the adjacent mobile home park bisects the site. The site is currently vacant. The rezone is
sought in order to develop a preliminary plat referred to as “Adams Vista” in accordance with the
requirements of the R3 (Duplex Residential) zoning district. The site is located east of the southern
terminus of Hemlock Street SE. The site is located between the Auburn Way South and the White River.
L1107-2
O3.8 REZ04-0006
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember:Staff:
Norman Krauss
Meeting Date:Item Number:
November 7, 2005 VIII.A.3
Agenda Subject: Date:
Public Hearing Application No. PLT03-0002 with plat modification October 28, 2005
The Hearing Examiner recommendation is to only approve the rezoning of the northern 6.8 acres of the
site from RR (Rural Residential) and RMHP (Residential Mobile Home Park) to R3 (Duplex Residential).
The Hearing Examiner’s recommendation differed from the staff’s recommendation since it recommended
denial of the rezone from RR (Rural Residential) to R3 (Duplex Residential) for the southern 6.2 acres of
the site that is steeply sloped and proposed to be tract (Tract B) dedicated to the City of Auburn as part of
the associated preliminary plat.
On September 28, 2005 a Request for Reconsideration was filed by Jane Ryan Kohler on behalf of Frary
Breckenridge. On October 11, 2005 the applicant’s representative, Hans Korve, provided a letter to the
Hearing Examiner responding to the Request for Reconsideration.
The Hearing Examiner ruled on the Request for Reconsideration by adding a plat condition (Condition
Number 9) regarding installation of protective fencing for trees to be retained. On October 12, City staff
made a written request for clarification to the Hearing Examiner of his decision. On October 21, 2005 the
Hearing Examiner issued a decision modifying Condition Number 9 of his earlier decision and to replace
“qualified professional forester” with “certified arborist”.
The City has received written confirmation from the applicant that exceeding the 120-day permit
processing timeframe is acceptable.
Page 2 of 2