Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12-04-2006 ITEM VIII-A-1
CITY OF AUBURN WASHINGTON AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Amendment to Auburn City Code Chapter 19.02 related to Date: school impact fees November 28, 2006 Department: Planning, Building, Attachments: Ordinance No. 6060, Budget Impact: N/A and Community School District CFPs ❑ Planning Comm. Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6060. Background Summary: Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 19.02.060 provides for the annual review and update of school impact fees collected by the City of Auburn on behalf of local school districts (Auburn, Kent, Federal Way, and Dieringer). This review occurs in conjunction with updates to the capital facilities plan element of the City's comprehensive plan. The amount collected for a school district is determined by the net fee obligation identified in their capital facilities plan (CFP). Copies of the school district CFPs are attached. ACC Section 19.02.060 entitled "Annual council review" states, "On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. The city council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary; provided, that any school impact fee adjustment that would increase the school impact fee shall require the submittal of a written request for the adjustment by the applicable school district concurrent with the submittal of the annual capital facilities plan pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. In making its decision to adjust impact fees, the city council will take into consideration the quality and completeness of the information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan." (emphasis added) The proposed code amendment would update ACC Sections 19.02.120 and .140 for the amount of school impact fees for the Auburn and Federal Way school districts (both year 2007 impact fee amounts reflect a decrease from 2006). The Kent School District net fee obligation increases from 2006 to 2007; however, the City did not receive a written request for a fee increase from the Kent School District as required by ACC 19.02.060. The Dieringer School District is not requesting altered fees for the 2006-2007 school year. The proposed code amendment would update ACC Sections 19.02.115 and .130 by removing the text relating to fees collected in 2005 for Kent and Dieringer, while retaining the 2006 fees. L1204-2 F4.3 meviieweu oy %,ounce a 1,omminees: ❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES ❑ Airport ❑ Finance ❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Serv. ❑ Human Services E Planning & CD ❑ Park Board EPublic Works ❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other Keviewea ny uepartments & Divisions: ❑ Building ❑ M&O ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor ❑ Finance ❑ Parks ❑ Fire E Planning ❑ Legal ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: ❑Yes []No Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing Referred to Until —/—/ Tabled Until Councilmember: NormanStaff: Davolio Meeting Date: December 4, 2006 1 Item Number: VIII.A.1 AUBURN* MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6060 Date: December 4, 2006 If adopted, then, the proposed ordinance would set forth the following school impact fee schedule for January 1, 2007. School District Single Family Units Multi -Family Units Auburn $5,657.05 $1,228.84 Kent $4,775 $2,940 Federal Way $3,018 $856 Dieringer $3,500 $739 The above amounts for the Auburn and Federal Way School Districts are the net fee obligations identified in their respective capital facilities plans. The Auburn and Federal Way amounts result in a decrease from the amount collected in 2006. The Kent School District impact fee stays at its 2006 levels as the City did not receive a written request for an increase. Likewise, the Dieringer School District impact fee amounts remain at the 2006 level. On November 27, 2006 the Planning and Community Development Committee recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 6060 which was also reviewed by the Public Works Committee. Based on committee comments, a letter will be sent to the Dieringer School District noting that the City expects to receive an updated six-year capital facilities plan (CFP) next year and would like the quality of that CFP to be consistent with those submitted by the other school districts. Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 6 0 6 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 AND 19.02.140 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACT FEES WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has adopted school impact fee ordinance and collects school impact fees on behalf of certain school districts; and WHEREAS, various school districts have provided the City of Auburn with updated capital facilities plans to be considered during the City's annual comprehensive plan amendment process; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Code provides for adjustments to school impact fees based on a review of the capital facilities plans. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. Section 19.02.115 is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.115 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Dieringer School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule below is based upon a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. ----------------- Ordinance No. 6060 November 15, 2006 Page 1 of 5 A. U4til-Deco- _3-,-20- fhe--wheel-+ ac4-fee-shall be--as7-�s P-er Single -Family -Dwelling Unit ----$x;425.04---._ B- Effective January 1, 2006, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $3,500.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $739.00 Section 2. Amendment to City Code. Section 19.02.120 is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.120 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Auburn School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees basE�d on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. A. E�ffec-tivemolar-�t of e 2 t +e— coat-4Ti a-Gt4ee-sl am b&44e-le-&_&er e the -fes llewm 0 9- 00 -- Re M ulama- Dwe 4iRg Unit — T;z 0th 00 2---Sheul�a— the net r� ilrie � -I he-- rp c'v� ic�'.���##� 11� �I -Gapit fac4lities pla-n--adopted by the uFR SGhGel st--tGt-�kJe--le-ss4 4an-a44ia }4s-!'sted in subsection -9 of this --section- then -the -fee obligation -shell be ki accordance with rc tm�.. he n®t fan nhligati4de-tified in r. on_wc-rTrrrrc�cx�Tr-amu t.` "F'•"`" �—Pc'Tr the Gr it i fae+li#fes ete cent aGit-y-ef-Aube Ws-eorpreheneive-plen: B: ---------Until January December 31, 2006, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $5,681.36 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $1,536.30 R i ,fec_tive JarlUry 1__200 , the school impact fess shall be ass fellows: ----------------- Ordinance No. 6060 November 15, 2006 Page 2 of 5 Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $5,657.05 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $1,228.84 Section 3. Amendment to City Code. Section 19.02.130 is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.130 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Kent School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Kent School District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. A. Until-),-_ce fon shall a� feflew� Per -Single -Family -Dwelling -Unit l`' er-Mu-ltif . :09 — B- Effective January 1, 2006, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $4,775.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $2,940.00 Section 4. Amendment to City Code. Section 19.02.140 is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.140 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Federal Way School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Federal Way School District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn City Council as an element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. A. Until December 31. 2006 Tthe school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $ 3,393.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $ 895.00 ----------------- Ordinance No. 6060 November 15, 2006 Page 3of5 B. Effective January 1 2007, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single -Family Dwelling Unit $ 3,018.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $ 856.00 Section 5. Constitutionality or Invalidity. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 6. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: IJG1MI:I 1 APPROVED: ----------------- Ordinance No. 6060 November 15, 2006 Page 4 of 5 PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk [Taniel B. Heid City Attorney ----------------- Ordinance No. 6060 November 15, 2006 Page 5 of 5 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 40$ CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 •,uL" 1 P mvunzainvim High Scrod --mil ti • irw Grxnemry scxtoot Adopted by the Aubum School District Board of Directors April 24, 2006 C AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Craig Schumaker Theraki Leonard Janice Nelson Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent M Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ........................ Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections ..................... Page 6 Section III Standard of Service ........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities ....................... Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity......... ....................... Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan ................. Page 20 Section VII Impact Fees............ .... Page 23 .................. Section Vill - Appendices ................................... Page 27 Appendix A.1- Student Enrollment Projections Page 28 Appendix A-2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 42 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 45 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Aulbum School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2006. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole pian for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King Comity and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impacl� fees in the Cities ofAigona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines donot account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 34 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per - classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted. to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2 2005-06 capacity was 12,976 whereas Full Time Equivalent C'FTE') enrollment for this same period was 13,386.64. The actual number of individual students was 14,088 as of October 1, 2005. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005. Also, the acquisition of new middle school site and construction of a new middle school is needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City ofAuburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is. with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span; for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2006 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level 'fist of changes from previous year. Section It Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A 18 A.2. Section 111 Standard of Service A Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the elementary level. B. Increase of 1 learning specialist classroom at elementary level C. Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level D. Increase of 1 structured learning classroom at elementary level Section IV Inventory of Facilities A Updated to include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in inventory, opening 2006. B. Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations. Section V Pupil Capacity A Updated to include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in inventory, opening 2003. B. Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations. 4 Aubum School DisW No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section Vil Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2005 to 200Ei CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2005 2006 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3216 0.3010 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1584 0.1510 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1632 0.1660 records of average actual student generation Multi -Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0687 0.0611 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0462 0.0317 Sr. High 0.0486 0.0452 School Construction Costs Elementary $15;600,000 $16,900,000 Updated project estimated costs. Facility Capacity Elementary 650 550 Change to 2005 Citizen Ad Hoc Recommendation Boeckh Index $129.81 $154.22 Updated to projected SPI scheduk:.(G. Beds) Match % - State 55.86% 55.71 % Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 44.14% 4429% Computed District Average AV Single Family $218,805 $237,281 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi -Family $55,264 $57,530 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data using wtighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.49 $2.39 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.63% 4.39% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-06) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2005 Appendix A2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A3 - Student Generation Survey 5 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 "trough 2012 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows The anticipated enrollment for the next six ye*s based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown inAppendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT I LUtJy-LuIV 1 701D-2011 1 2011-2( 5638 t1.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2005 6168 6271 3168 3259 1 3269 1 ACTUAL PROD PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2005-2006 2006-20071 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 KDG 955 966 984 1005 1030 1055 1072 1 963 1017 1037 1058 1085 1110 1129 2 963 979 1041 1063 1090 1115 1134 3 1002 986 1011 1076 1104 1130 1149 4 939 1017 1010 1038 1109 1136 1156 5 1065 959 1047 1043 1077 1148 1168 K-5. 5887 5924 6130 6284 6495 6695 6807 6 1004 1086 989 1080 1082 1115 1178 7 1028 1032 1123 1030 1126 1127 1152 8 1137 1042 1056 1150 .1062 1157 1150 6-8 3169 3160 3168 3259 3269 3398 3479 9 1379 1425 1346 1369 1477 1397 1489 10 1383 1310 1366 1286 1313 1415 1321 11 1182 1301 1236 1291 1213 1234 1324 12 1 10881092 1218 1153 1211 1129 1139 9-12 5032 5128 1 5165 5099 1 5214 I 5174 5273 TOTALS 14D8T3 14212 1 14463 14642 14978 1 15268 15559 JES K-12 w/K @ 1/2 6-8 9-12 2 5410 5441 3169 3160 5032 5128 13611 1 13730 .+F -c.wu cwo-cwa I LUtJy-LuIV 1 701D-2011 1 2011-2( 5638 5781 5980 6168 6271 3168 3259 1 3269 1 3398 3479 5165 5099 5214 5174 5273 7 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a 'Standard of. Service" in order to ascertain the overap capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capac tly guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehide to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the districts capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Aubum School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Aubum School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,887 students in grades K through 5. The 905 of the 955 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5, plus 25 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,435. Four middle schools house 3,169 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,032 students in grades 9 through 12. The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupMeacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 -12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Aubum School District Standard of Service,. determines the Districts capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level, ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Aubum School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. 9 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS - The Aubum School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fifteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26.5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 HEAD START Total Capacity Loss (27) The Aubum School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 112 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities bek►w age five. This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines: Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) 10 Autwm School District No. 408 CAPItAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345)' ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level. for students teaming English as a second language. This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 morns @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly imparted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and curentfy has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all twelve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) 11 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLYDISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities. One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school IeVeL This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirety provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MiDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per muddle school; The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students leaming English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are :not provided for in the SPi space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/'05 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approAmmtely 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Aubum. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program. requires five standard classrooms_ that ani not provided fot in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured learning center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific leaming disabilities. The current senior high school program requires sixteen classrooms to provide for approximately 420 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the sixteen teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 Aubum School District No, 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/05 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the! senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,014) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,014) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,510) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,510) . TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,004) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,004) 14 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OPSI rated cafecities. Table IV2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Pennanent Facilities District School Facilities IV.1 @ OSPi Rate Capacity (November 2005) Building capacityf Acres Address Elements Schools 16 Washington Elemen 4925.40 20 E Street N Auburn WA 98002 Terminal Park Elemen 401 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 10.50 1039 14th Street N Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 830 2301 M -Street Smoeast, Auburn W.A, 980()2 Chinook Ekementary 485 8.75 3502 Auburn Way Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn W7► 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 531 10.00 1005 371h Street Smkffieast, Auburn WA 98002 Evenveen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA 98001 Alpac Elementary494 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific W 98047 Lake View Elementary 595 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Stye Auburn WA !98092 Hazelwood Elementary 578 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th S Auburn WA !)8092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elemen 585 -6,626 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA,98092 ELEM CAPACITY Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 17.30 1015 24th Street N Auburn WA 98iD02 -Olympic Middle School 898 17.40 1825 K Street South Auburn WA 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 845 30.88 620 37th Street_ Southeast Auburn WA 98002 MS CAPACITY 3 428 Senior Hieb Schools West Auburn Hi School 7 231 5.10 401 West Main StreetAuburn WA 98001 Auburn Senior Hi 2 37 18.60 800 Fourth Street No Aubum WA 98(102 Auburn Riverside IIS 1 88 33.00 501 Oravetz Roa Auburn WA 98092 Aubum Mountainview HS 1431. 40.00 28900124 Ave SE AuburnWA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5 87 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,341 16 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES IV.2 FAMITIES INVENTORY 2005 O6 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 March 2006 0 0 0 0 2 -2 Elemen Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 21j10-11 2010-11 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dido Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights. 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 33 33 33 30 30 :3030 TOTAL CAPACITY 875 875 875 795 7% 795 7% Middle school Location 2005 O6 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 Cascade 0 0 0 0 2 -2 2 aye 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 . 5 5 8 8 8 8 ML Baker 4 4 6. 8 6 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 9 9 13 18 18 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 270 1 390 540 1 540 540 540 Hi h Sdiool Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 eStAubum 0 0 1 1 1 n�r ns� burn [Abum 12 12 12 12 12 1 12 1 12 bum Riverside 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 TAL UNITS 22 22 23 3 23 0 2;3 0 23 TOTAL CAPACITY 660 660 690 ]690 690 690 690 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 64 69 71 71 711 71 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,805 1,805 1.955 2-025 n n�r ns� 17 1 3 ZJ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the Districts educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The Districts capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables VA and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the DisWs capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA 550 5W 4,004 4,124 Capacity 750 4;124 WITH relocatables 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 A. Al SPI Capacity SPI Capacity -New Elem 14,817 14,817 550 15,367 550 15,917 15,917 16,667 16,667 A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 1 -JL Exclude SOS 12 3,898 4,004 4,124 4,124 750 Total Adjustments (3,898) B. C. Capacity Adjustments Net Capacity 2,093 2,199 2,170 2,099 12.099) 2,099 (2,099) 12,724 13,168 13,747 13,818 14,568 14,568 14,568 D. ASD Enrollment 14,088 14,212 14,463 14,642 14,978 -15,268 15,559 E ASD SurplusMeficit (1,364) (1,045) (716) (824) (410) (700) (991) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Rebcatable Exclude SOS 12 1,805 (3.898)1 1,805 4,004 1,955 4,124 2,025 4,124 2,025 4,124 2,025 I'4,124 2,025 4,124 Total Adjustments (2,093) (?,199) (2,170) (2,099) (2,099) (2,099) (2,0991 Capacity WITHOUT reloci A. ISPI Capac Yib-W 2006-07 1 2007-08 2008-09 20 14,817 14.817 15,367 15,917 1 10 20.10-11 2011-12 117 16,667 16,667 Al SPI Capacity -New Elem i/ A2 SPI Capacity- New MS B. Capacity Adjustments 3,898 C. Net Capacity 10,919 550 5W 4,004 4,124 4,124 750 4;124 15,268 11,363 11,793 11,793 12,543 D. ASD Enrollment 14,088 14,212 14,463 14,642 14,978 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,169) (2,849) (2,670) (2,849) (2,435) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 1 -JL Exclude SOS 12 3,898 4,004 4,124 4,124 4,124 Total Adjustments (3,898) (4,004) (4,124) (4,124) (4,124) 1l New facilities shown in 2009-10 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 21 The Standard of Service represents 24.69% of SPI capacity. VVhen new faaTitiees are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 20.26% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non-tassroom spaces (commons, library, theater) 19 54,124 4,124 12,543 12,543 15,268 15,559 (2;725) (3,016) 1 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRucTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document: titled 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - -A Community Involved The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans.for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided fimding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided finding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire sphool sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population dot will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is imnuAiately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at aur aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next :10 years if a new senior high school is not buil. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71 % yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary # 13 and Elementary # 14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed resolution # 1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Elementary #13 is under construction in the Lakeland area on a 12 acre: site and 21 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21W through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2006. Elementary # 14 is currently in bid process and constructi,Dn is scheduled to begin in Spring of 2006 and to open in the Fall of 2007. The school will be constructed on a l 0 acre site the district owns in the Lea Hill area In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study, and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District, One of the areas of study was the need iror New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. The committee also recommended that the District have Middle School #5 on-line by Fall of 2009. The District is projecting 1470 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lea Hill areas. This increase in student population will require the construction of two new elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-one percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students' generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2005-12 Capital Construction Plan Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Cost Source N! Facilities - Mar -06 New Middle School Yes 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Technology Modernization Yes $12,000,000 2006 6 Year XX XX XX XX yJ( XX Portables Yes $700,000 Impac,K Fees XX XX XX XX 1 ill Property Purchase New Middle School Yes $5,000,000 Bond Impact XX XX Fees 1/ Elementary#13 Yes $16,900,000 Bond Impact XX XX Fees const o n 1/ Elementary #14 Yes $18,600,000 Bond Impact XX XX XX Fees Ian const o n 1/ Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX XX XX XX Ian const const I 1/ New Sr. High 9 Yes $58,500,000 Bond Impact )()( 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds_ The District currently is not eliigil* for state assistance at.thp elementary school level. 22 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2006) 2006 through -2012 Auburn Mountainvlew High School Within 6 year period Lakeland Hills Elementary within 6 year period Elementary #14 within the 6 year period Middle School #5 within 6 year period Middle school Site arx)ul$don within 6 year period /. S?L EAST P6cR RCtt�1•is . Formula: ((Acres x Coat r Acre /Facility Size x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student .Gene Acres a Acre Ca act Sin t en; EIsm (K - 5) 12 $0 Middle Sch (8 - 8 2g $50 0.3010 Sr HI h 9 - i2 $146,729 800 0.1510 40 $0 1800 0.1680 n. PERM NTgaurYGON�TRL�GT/0� /V_ [psrpFaaee►nrti��e Formula. ((Facility COsNFacility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to T„mi c..,,..- r__. wau Multi Famli Stn le Famtl Multi Farr 0.0611 $0.00 $0.00 0.0317 $692.38 $145.35 "=Total n (K - 5) $16,800,000 550 Ft 0.9681 Sin le Famil Multi Faml Sin le Famll Multi Famil SCh (8 - 8) $30,000,000 800 0,9681 0.3010 0.0611 $8,953.88 $1,817.54 I h 9 -12 $58,500,000 1500 0.9881 0.1510 0.0317 $5,481.86 $1,150.83 0.1860 0.0452 $6,267.47 $1,706.57 ill. TEMPp�e�Eay pqC/uTy GONSTRfaCr/ON DOST PER REST Nns Formula. ((Faculty 2"WOoitity size) x Student Factor) x (TemDorSN 1 LhO--112____] sin le Famll Multi Fa 28.5 0.0319 03010$80,000 30 .$0.00 I 0.0319 0,1b10 0,0317 $12.85 $2.70 30 0.0319 0.1660 n nda� ..,, ,... _ - 24 . Auburn School District No, 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 201-2 V. TAX CREDIT P_ER RAe/DEM Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC a PV(Interest rate,discount perlod,averege asad value x tax rate) Multi us- I Tax Rate "' IMA Ann Int Rats Years Single Fatuity Multi 1 S710 10 V1• QE]�LOPER PROVIDED FII CI /TY srien/r Formula: (Value of Site or Fecility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Unita Fscll Credit Single Family $0.00 1 , Multi Family $0.00 1 RECAP Permanent Facility Const Costs41""•4a $20,$12..85 20 Temporary Facility Costs $4,874.94 State Match Credit $12 ($8,582.65) $2.70 Tax Credit ($1,271.44 FEE (No Discount) $4.811.68 $1,093.88' $11,314.09 FEE (50% Discount) $5,657.05 Facility $1,228.84 $0.00 .,, ..., Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Recent Property Lewis b.00 IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Price Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count (3/06) New Fac Capacity ASD Distrtot Standards New Facility Cost Sr. High Cost Estimate as of May 2003 1999 Elementary Cost Estimates Sept 2005 Polygon Middle School Cost Estimate Feb 2005 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. Lakeland Grades K - 5 0 26.5 and 6-12030. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, Including site work, set up, and fumishing Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum Site Cost/Acre See below Perm Sq Footage SPI Rpt #3 dated Nov 3, 2005 Temp Sq Footage 84 portables at 832 sq, ft. each Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above % - Penn Facilities % - Tamp Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided .by Total Sq. Footage Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. 53,248 109,173 Footage SPI Sq Fl/Student From SPI Regulatlons Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for March 2006 Match % - State From SPI Webpage March 2006 Match % - District Computed Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments 3/6/2006 Debt Sery Tax Rate (multi family weighted average) Current Fiscal Year G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2006). Recent Property Lewis b.00 T ear 1989 Price Moore 5.00 1999 $495,4 Plemmons 17.28 1999 $510,4 Polygon 22.55 19.99 $1,317,7 Lakeland 12 00 IT $2,812,1 $58,500,000 i &VVZ I $2,701.0 r -fern Mid Sch 8-8 Sr High �Elem Mid SchK-5 Sr High 0.3010 0.1510 9-12 0.1660 -5 8'8 9-12 0.0317 0.0452 550 800 1500 0.0611 $16,900,000 $30,000,000 $58,500,000 550 $16,900,000 800 $30,000,000 1500 $58,500,000 26.5 30 30 26.5 30 30 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 12 $146,729 25 $146,729 40 $146,729 12 $146,729 25 40 $146,729 $146,729 1,615, 925 53,248 1,615, 925 53,248 1,615, 925 1,615, 925 1,615, 925 1,615, 925 1,669,173 1,669,173 53,248 109,173 53,248 1,669,173 53,248 53,248 0.9681 0.9581 0.9681 0.9881 1869 173 1,889,173 0:0319 0.0319 0.0319 0.0319 0.9681 0.0319 0.9881 0.0319 90 $154.22 108 $154.22 130 $154.22 90 $154,22 108 130 ° 85,71 /0 55.710/6 55.71% 55,71 % $154.22 85.71% $154.22 44.29%44.29% ° 44.29 h 44.29% 44.29% 65.71% 44.29% $237,281 $237,281 $237,281 $57,530 $57,530 $57,530 $2.39 4.39% $2.39 4.39% $2.39 $2.39 $2.39 $2.39 4.39% 4.39% 4.39% 4.39% "'"""" ^"" saes Latest Date Inflation Feotor I Required of Acquisitioi 110 $124,7081 1 1 1 $76,259 5,00% Middle School 2006 $146,729 26 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATION PURPOSES Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2005 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being'used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I — Thirteen Year History of October I Enrollments — page 31 The data shown in. this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in hkgtiom. - page M This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1— Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 29 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births... This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 — Proiection Models —pages 33-41 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 33) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 33) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 34) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 35) — breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 36) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH. 13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 37) — breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 38) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 39A 1) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and Percent formats for the past 13 years. 30 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 IA . Grade Group Combinations KDG K,1,2 930 2849 927 2868 957 2894 963 978 854 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 K-5 5618 5685 5729 2931 5799 3023 5946 2872 2807 2731 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 K-8 6468 8609 6853 8715 8887 5837 8799 5856 5844 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 6837 8842 6942 8845 6885 6755 6891 1-3 1-5 2842 4688 2904 4758 2908 4712 2958 3025 3027 3012 2850 2683 2801 2887 2870 2928 1-6 5538 5682 5696 4838 5752 4988 5909 4083 5007 4932 '5068 4836 4852 . 4843 4932 5945 5988 5930 6096 5940 5963 5863 5936 6-8 7-8 2686 1836 2760 2755, 1831 2799 2811 2860 2970 2980 3049 3151 3294 3274 3169 7-9 2.797 .1836 2804 2904., 1883 2944 1870 3033 1898 1989 1982 2021 2047 2183 2254 2165 3054 3191 3204 3426 3488 3656 3715 3544 9-12 10-12 3208 2247 3357 2389 3629 2556 3843 4012 4245 4225 4311 4498 4535 4634 4663 5032 2782 2849 3089 3023 3089 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 !3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT tOLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 3 1 _iss CAL' TOTAL ENDAR LIVE 2(3rds 1/3rds 1970 19,528 13,017 6,509 1971 16,436 10,957 5,479 1972 13,719 9,146 4,573 1973 13,449 8,966 4,483 1974 13,493 8,995 4,498 1975 13,540 9,027 4,513 1978 13,781 9,174 4,587 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 1978 15,098 10,064 5,032 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 1980 18;800 11,200 5,600 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 1986 19,961 13,301 6,650 1987 22,803 15,202 7,801 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 1989 25,578 17,051 8,525 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 1992 20,060 13,373 607 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 1995 25,005 16,870 8,335 1998 21,573 14,382 7,191 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 1999 22,007 14,671 7,338 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 2002 21,883 14,575 7,288 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 2004 22,902 15,288 7,634 Source: Center for Health Stan, 32 OF I LIVE I KDG ENROLLI BIRTHS IENROL 75/76 19,840 822 76/77 17,488 852 77/78 14,625 578 78/79 13,539 598 79/80 13,478 618 80/81 13,524 800 81/82 13,687 588 82/83 14;375 698 83/84 14,958 868 84/85 18,048 726 85/88 18,708 792 86/87 17,000 829 87/88 18,241 769 88/89 18,626 817 89/90 18,827 871 90/91 19,510 856 91/92 19,893 909 92/93 21,852 920 93/94 21,624 930 94/95 .24,062 927 95196 26,358 954 98/97 24,116 963 97/98 20,973 978 98/99 21,573 854 99/00 22,129 849 00/01. 24,013 912 01/02 22,717 846 02/03 21,822 905 03/04 22,023 922 04/05 22,075 892 05/06 22,327 966 06/07 22,014 899 07/08 21,835 891 08/09 22,242 908 09/10 22,745 929 10/11 7.634 • orenmin ENROLLMENT AS A % OF ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS 3.135% 3.733% 3:952% 4.417% 4.585% 4.436% 4.296% 4.856% 4,452% 4,524% 4.740% 4.876% 4.216% 4.386% 4.626% 4.398% 4.569% 4.210% 4.301% 3.853% 3.619% 3.993% 4.663% 3.959% 3.837% Actual <-Pdetd Average <-Pdctd Average <-Pdctd Average <-Pdctd Average / number of DOH 10/3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 3v. 13 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 73/ OJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE Ob/06 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 14 14115 15118 16117 17/18 18!19 KDG 955 957 959 961 983 985 988 970 972 974 978 1 963 1009 1011 1013 1015 1017 1019 1021 1023 1025 1027 029 030 0 1 834 2 963 970 1015 1018 1020 1022 1024 1026 1028 1030 1032 1034 1038 1038 3 1002 977 984 1029 1031 1034 1036 1038 1040 1042 1044 1046 1048 1050 4 939 1008 983 990 1.035 1037 1039 1041 1043 1048 1048 1050 1052 1054 5 1085 950 1019 993 1000 1046 1048 1050 1052 1054 1056 1058 1080 1063 6 1004 1076 961 1030 • 1004 1011 1057 1059 1661 1063 1065 1067 1069 1071 7 1028 1023 1095 979 1048 1023 1030 1075 1078 1080 1082 1084 1086 1088 8 1137 1032 1027 1099 983 1052 1027 1034 1079 1081 1084 1068 1088 1090 9 1379 1412 1307 1302 1374 1259 1327 1302 1309 1355 1357 1359 1361 1363 10 1383 1299 1332 1227 1222 1294 1179 1247 1222 1229 1275 1277 1279 1281 11 1182 1291 1207 1240 1135 1130 1202 1086 1155 1130 1137 1182 1185 1187 12 1088 1083 1192 110$ 1141 1036 1031 1103 988 1058 1031 1038 1084 1pgg TOTALS 14088 14086 14090 13988 13972 1392513985 14052 14050 1418b 14213 14288 14359 1 4388 Percent of Gain (0.02)°� 0 03% (0 73)% (0 11)% (0.34)% 0.43 0.48°i6 ° ° Pu it Gain 2 5 102 1 g 47 (0.02)% 0.82% 0.34 /0 0.53% 0,49% 0.19% 60 87 3 115 48 75 70 27 .TABLE 3.8 KDG "v'vQ 955 vain 07/08 08/09 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13114 14115 1R PROJ 1 . 983 984 1014 972 1023 981 989 998 1007 1015 1024 1032 15/16 1041 16/107 1050 108 2 983 975 1026 1031 1035 1040 1043 1049 1057 1066 1074 1083 1092 1900 1058 1109 1067 1117 3 1002 982 994 1045 1054 1052 1063 1060 1071 1069 1078 1088 1098 1103 1112 1121 4 939 1022 1003 1014 1066 1074 1083 1080 1091 1088 1097 1106 1114 1123 1131 S 1065 984 1047 1028 1040 1091 1099 1108 1100 1109 1117 1126 1134 1143 6 1004 1087 986 1070 1050 1062 1113 1122 1117 1125 1134 1142 1151 1160 7 1028 1016 1099 998 1082 1062 1074 1125 1130 1139 1147 1156 1185 1173 8 1137 1043 1031 1115 1014 1097 1077 1089 1134 1142 1151 1159 1188 1177 9 1379 1526 1432 1420 1b03 1403 1486 1466 1140 1149 1158 1188 1175 1183 10 1383 1219 1365 1272 1260 1343 1242 1325 1478 1529 1538 1546 1555 1564 11 1182 1241 1077 1223 1130 1118 1201 1100 1306 1318 1369 1377 1388 1395 12 1088 1100 1159 995 1141 1048 1 036 1119 1183 1164 1176 1227 1235 1244 TOTALSI 140 88 141 53 14216 14412 14458 14607 14778 1018 1101 1082 1094 1145 1153 Percent of Gain 0.48% 0.44% O.08% .pB% 1.30% 0,32% 1,03% 1.16% 14870 15074 1$204 15381 15516 15628 Pupil Gain 65 62 12 185 46 149 0.84% 1.37% 0.88% 1,04% 1.01% 0..72% 169 95 204 129 158_ 154 112 .•3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT :OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 3.1 GRADE I 05/06 I 06/07 1 07!08 OB/09 09/10 I 10/11 11/12 I I PROJ I I PROJ I P6/�� PROJ PROJ K 955 899 891 908 929 929 12/13 13/14 14/ 5 14/15 15/18 16/17 17/18 1 .963 1009 952 .945 962 982 988 2 963 970 1015 959 952 989 989 1000 3 1002 977 984 1029 973 966 982 1003 1019 4 5 939 1065 1008 983 990 1035 979 972 988 1009 1039 6 1004 950 1076 4019 961 993 1000 1048 990 982 999 1019 1064 1028 1023 1095 1030 1004 1048 1011 1067 1001 993 1010 1030 1087 8 1137 1032 1027. .979 1099 983 1023 1030 1076 1019 1012 1029 1049 1099 9 1379 1412 13.07 1302 1374 1052 1259 1027 1327 1034 1079 1023 1018 1032 1053 1114 10 1383 1299 1332 1227 1222 1294 1179 1302 1309 1355 1298 1291 1308 1326 11 1182 1291 1207 1240 1135 1130 1202 1247 1222 1229 1275 1218 1211 1228 12 1088 1083 1192 1108 1141 1036 1031 1086 1155 1130 1137 1182 1126 1119 TOTALS 14088 14027 .13984 13808 13758 14133 1103 988 1058 1031 1038 1084 1027 Percent of (0.43)% (0.45)% (1.11)76 (0.37)% 0.88% Pupil Gain (61) Taal 1, «t 1.11 ; ft. GRADE 05/Og 08/07 O7/08 '- 08/09 ^�� 09/10 rRVJ 10/11 rKud PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ KDG 9bb 899 891 908 929 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 16/17 17/18 18/18 1 983 1014 958 951 967 988 2 963 975 1028 970 962 979 1000 3 4 1002 939 982 994 1045 989 982 998 1019 5 1022 1003 1014 1066 1009 1002 1019 1039 6 1085 1004 964 1087 1047 1028 1040 1091 1035 1027 1044 1064 7 1028 1016 986 1099 1070 1050 1082 1113 1057 1049 1066 1087 8 1137 1043 1031 998 1115 1082 1014 1062 1074 1125 1069 1081 1078 1099 9 1379 1526 1432 1420 1503 1097 1403 1077 1089 1140 1084 1077 1093 1114 10 1383 1219 1365 1272 1260 1343 1486 1466 1478 1529 1473 1466 1482 1503 11 1182 1241 1077 1223 1130 1118 1242 1201 1325 1306 1318 1369 1313 1305 1322 12. 1088 1100 . 1159 995 1141 1048 1036 1100 1183 1164 1176 1227 1171 1163 TOTALS 14088 14089 14070 14009 14133 1119 10 18 1101 1082 1094 1145 1089 Percent of Gain 0.00% (0.13)% (0,43)% 0.88% PUPll Gain 1 110i fail ; ft. 34 10/3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT Pft6AdTIONS -October 2005 13 ADEJ 05/08 1 08!07 1 07/08 08109 09/10 10111 1R02 12/Val13 13114 1 963 1014 909 1:101 1014 958 951 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 18/17 17/18 18/19 2 963 1009 970 1011 1015 1013 1018 1016 1020 1017980 1022 1019 1021 1023 1025 1027 1029 1031 1034 3 4 1002 939 977 1008 984 1029 1031 1034 1024 1036 1028 1038 1028 1040 1030 1032 1034 1036 1038 5 1085 0 95fu 983 1019 990 993 1035 1037 1039 1041 1043 1042 1046 1044 1048 1046 1048 1050 1 1000 1048 1048 1050 1052 1054 1056 1050 1058 1052 1054 eroen o air o or 51 1080 1083 �:-���--- Pup11. Gain (17) 100 34 81. 56 94 ° e TABLE97 3E.13A 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 — KUU - — IvwwI vwVl I 07/0808/09 108/09 09/1010/11 10/11 11/12 12/Val13 13114 1 963 1014 1023 963 1014 958 951 967 988 14/ 5 15/16 16/17 17/18 1 18/19 2 3 983 1002 975 1028 1031 1035 1040 1043 1049 1052 1057 1060 1066 1069 1074 1083 1092 1100 1109 1117 4 939 982 1022 994 1003 1045 1014 1054 1063 1071 1080 1078 1088 1086 1097 1095 1106 1103 1112 1121 5 1065 964 1047 1028 1066 1040 1074 1091 1083 1091 1100 1109 1117 1114 1126 1123 1134 1131 1099 1108 1117 1125 1134 1142 1151 1143 1180 erten o or Pupil Gain 34 14489 94 ° TABLE97 3E.13A b2 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 GRADE ACT AL 05/06 PRM 06/07 OT/08 810 09 09/10 10/11 11/12 PR 12/13 1 963 1009 952 13/14 14/15 15/18 18/17 17/18 18/19 2 963 970 1018 945 959 962 952 982 989 3 4 1002 939 977 1008 984 1029 973 966 989 982 1003 5' 1065 950 983 1019 990 993 1035 1000 979 972 988 00 1009 1048 990 982 1019 eroen o air _ PVPII Ga1n (75). 33 rim �Q rt i 06/07 1 07/08 108/09 .09/10 10/11 1 11/12 42/13 1 1 13/14 14/15 15/18 16/17 17/18 1 2 963 1014 958 951 967 988 3 963 1002 975 982 1026 994 970 962 979 1000 9 102 1003 1045 1014 989 1066 982 998 1019 6 1047 1028 1040 1009 1091 1002 1019 1039 ' sn"T�rsaa—r�„r 1035 1027 1044 108a 13/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT .OLLMENT PROJECTIONS. - October 2005 nviuAL ADE O5/OB PROD 08/07 PROJ 07/080 i=TO9/1 I'll 1111, [�11111 PROJ -- PROJ PROJ - PROD PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRO, 8 1004 1078 981 1030 1004 10/11 1011 11/12 12/13 13114 14/15 15/18 18/17 17/18. 18/19 7 1028 1023 1095 979 1048 1023 1057 1030 1059 1081 1083 1085 1087 1068 1071 8 1137 1032 1027 1099 983 1062 1027 1075 1078 1080 1082 1084 1086 1088 TOT 3169 3131 3082 3107 3036 3088 3114 1034 1079 1081 1084 1088 1088 1090 Penxnt of C3afn (1,21)% (1 55j% 0 83% o (2 30) /° ° 1.6 h 0.89% 3188 3218 3224 3230 3237 3243 3249 Pupil Gain (39> (49) 28 (72) 51 43 1.76% 1.57°� 0.19% 0.18°h 0.19% 0.19% 0.1994 27 54 50 8 6 6 8 6 8 1 004 1'087 988 1070 08/10 1050 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 16/17 17/18 18119 7 1028 1018 1099 998 1082 1062 1062 1113 1074 1122 1130 1139 1147 1156 1165 1173 8 1137 1043 1031 1115 1014 1097 1077 1125 1134 1142 1151 1169 1188 1177 TOT 3189 I 3147 1 3117 3183 3145 3221 3284 1089 1140 1149 1158 1166 1175 1183 PwAmm of Gain (0.71)% 94°/6 2 10% -1.17% 3 40% 1 35% 39 3404 3430 3456 3482 3507 3533 Pupil Gain (22) (30) 88 (37) 75 (72) 2 2,05% 76% .75% .75% .74% m 43 72 68 26 26 28 26 .7496 2a AUh 05/08 08/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 PROD P5018 1��1111 I'll P8/�� PR08 8 1004 1078 981 1030 1004 1011 10b7 12/13 1001 13/14 1086 1087 PROD 7 1028 8 1023 1095 979 1048 1023 1030 1075 993 1019 1010 1030 1099 1137 TOT 3188 1032 3131�49 1027 1099 983 1052 1027 1034 1079 1012 1023 1029 1018 1049 of Galn (1 21)%%0 (0.94)W 07 83% 33088Perosnt 2.40% 3284 3271 3259 3212 3242 1032 1053 Puil Gain39) (22) (} 28 (2 30)°� 1 87% 0 89°h (0 12) /o (0.58)% (1.52)% 0.98% (72) 51 27 (4) (18j (47) 30 8 1004 1087 v�ic,o 986 uC/V8 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 PROJ 16/17 7 1028 1016 1099 1070 1050 1082 1113 1057 1048 1086 1087 17/18 8 1137. 1043 1031 998 1115 1082 1014. 1082 1074 1125 1069 1061 1078 1099 TOT3189 3147 3117 3145 1097 3221 1077 1089 1140 1084 1077 1093 1114 P vmwnt of vain (0,71)% (0.94)W —1-83 210% (1 17)% 2.40% 3284 3271 3259 3212 3242 Pupil Gain (22) (30) 86 1.36% 0.21% ° (0.38) h o (1.44) /0 0.930 � (37) 7S 43 7 (12) (47) 30 i 36 10/3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 3SH.13 1528 veva 14 32 Vo/uv 1.420 1 09/10 1 10/11 1 11/1PIKVJ 2 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 18/17 17/18 18/19 JACTUALI GRADE 05/06 PROJ 08/07 I PROJ.; 07/08• PROJ 08/09 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD 1478 1629 1538 1548 1555 PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 9 1379 1412 1307 1302 09/10 1374 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 18/17 17/18 18/19 1048 10 1383 1298 1332 1227 1222 1259 1294 1327 1302 1309 1355 1357 1359 1381 1363 1036 11 1182 1291 1207 1240 1135 1130 1179 1247 1222 1229. 1275 1277 1279 1281 5011 12 1088 1083 1192 1108 1141 1036 1202 1086 1155 1130 1137 1182 1186 1187 (0.51)% 9.12 TOT 5032 5085 1 5038 4877 4872 4718 1031 1103 988 1056 1031 1038 1084 1086 , Pendent of Gain 1.08% (0.92)% (3.20)% (0,11)% (3,18)°� 4738 1 0.43% 4739 4874 4770 4800 4858 4908 4918 (13) Pupil -Gain,., 53 . 47 (181) (5 0.01 % (1.36)% 2.06% 0.62% ° 1.18 /0 ° 1.07,6 0.17% TABLE PROJ PROD PROJ (154) 20 0 (65) 96 29 57 52 8 11/12 9 1379 1528 veva 14 32 Vo/uv 1.420 1 09/10 1 10/11 1 11/1PIKVJ 2 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/18 18/17 17/18 18/19 10 1383 1219 1365 1272 1503 1280 1403 1343 1488 1488 1478 1629 1538 1548 1555 1564 11 1182 1241 1077 1223 1130 1118 1242 1325 1308 1318 1369 1377 1386 1395 12 1088 1100 1159 995 1141 1048 1201 1036 1100 1183 1164 1178 1227 1235 1244 9-12 TOT 5032 5085 5033 4910 5034 4911 1036 1119 1018 1101 1082 1094 1145 1153 Percent of Gain 1.06% (1.03)% (2.45)% 2.53% (2.45)% 4985 1.09% 5011 49851 5112 1 6184 1 5244 5321 .5356 Pupil Gain 53 (1.03)% (2.45)% 124 (2.45)% 1.09% 0.93% (0.51)% 2.54°� 1,02°h 1.55% 1.47°� 0.65°� TABLE 53 (52) (123) 124 123 54 48. 25 127 52 80 77 34 3SH.13A 46 (25) 127 (13) (1) 4 (281 ACTUAL GRADE 05/06 PROD1"123 08107 PROD PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ 9 1379 1412 1307 1302 09/10 1374 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 16/18 18/17 17/18 18/18 10 1383, 1289 1332 1227 1222 1259 1294 1327 1302 1309 1355 1298 1291 1 308 1328 11 1182 1291 1207 1240 1135 1130 1179 1202 1247 1222 1229 1275 1218 1211 1228 12 1088 1083 1192 1108 1141 1036 1031 1086 1155 1130 1137 1182 1128 1119 -12 TOT 5032 5086 5038 4877 4872 4718 1103 988 1058 1031 1038 1084 1027 PementofGain 1.08% (0.92)% '20) (3.20)% . (0:11)% (3.18)% 4738 0.43% 4739 4874 477T71_4741 4730 4729 4702 Pupil Gain 63 (47) 0.01°� (1.36)%. 2.06% (0.60)% (0.23)% (0.03)°x6 (0.58)% Teo (g) (-16) 20 0 (65) 96 _ (29) (l 1) (1) 113a% LADE 05/08 06/07 07/08 "-"""' 08/09 09/10 'muJ 10/11 PROD PROJ I PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 9 1379 1526 1432 1420 1503 1403 11/12 1486 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 1AM7 +��+,o , 18/19 10 1383 1219 1365 1272 1260 1343 1242 1466 1478 102V1473 1466 1482 1503 11 1182 1241 1077 1223 1130 1118 1201 1325 1306 1318 1369 1313 1305 1322' 12 1088 1100 1169 995 1141 1048 1036 1100 1183 1164 1176 1227 1171 1163 ZTOT 5032 5085 5033 4910 .8034 4911 4968 1119 6011 1018 1101 1082 109 4 1145 1089 Percent of Gain 1.08% (1.03)% (2.45)% 2.53% (2.45)% 1.09% 0,93% 4986 (0.51)% 5112 2.64°� 5099 5094 5103 5077 Pupil Gain 53 (52) (123) 124 (123) 54 0 25 % ( ) (0.01 % ) 0.08% (0.52) ° 46 (25) 127 (13) (1) 4 (281 '3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT .OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 4 GRADE 05/08 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 ""° 10111 rnv� rRvd PKOJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ E 13 955 857 959 961 963 5155 11112 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 18/17 17118 1 8119 EA 955 964 972 981 989 965 998 986 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 E.13A 955 899 891 908 929 5500 1007 1015 1024 1032 1041 1050 1058 1067 uE 05!08 06/07 1 07/081-2!29 08/09 09/10 1 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 VKUJ 14/15 fib/ 8 8/01 PROS PROJE.13 13 4932 4913 5011 $043 5101 5155 5185 5176 13/14 1r%5 15/18 18!17 17/18 18/19 E.6 4932 4958 5093 5154 5242 5328 5371 $414 5188 5197 5207 5218 5228 5238 E.13A 4932 4913 4953 4917 4922 3107 5457 5500 5543 5586 5629 5672 v+vcI v0iu0 1 08/07 1 07/08 1 08/09 09/10 10/11 11112 12/13 13114 VKUJ 14/15 PROD 15/16 � MW 1718 PBROJJ 13 3189 3131/19 3082 3107 3038 3086 3114 3168 13/14 14116 15/18 18!17 17/18 18/19 8 3169 3147 3117• 3183 3.145 3221 3284 3336 3218 3224 3230 3237 3243 3249 13A 3169 3131 3082 3107 3036 3086 3114 3110 3404 3092 3430 3456 3482 3507 3533 6A - 3169 -- 3147 3117 3183 3145 3221 3284 3271 3259 3046 3212 3075 3242 GRADE I Sm. 1 3, SH.0 SH. 13A SH.6A 06/06 5032 5032 6032 5032 OB/p7 5085 5085 5085 5085 07/08 5038 5033 5038 5033 909/10 4877 4910 4877 4910 4872 5034 4872 5034 "' 10/11 4718 4911 4718 4911 "" 11112 4738 4965 4738 4985 r^v� 12/13 4739 6011 4739 5011 rr[v7 13/14 VKUJ 14/15 PROD 15/16 PROJ 16/17 PROD 17/18 PROJ 18/1 18/19 4874 4985 4674 4985 4770 5112 4770 6112 4800 5184 4741 5099 4858 5244 4730 5099 4908 5321 4729 5103 4916 5356 4702 5077 GRADE 05/08 08!07 07/08 08/09 09/10 .INWO 10/11 rrNv� 11/12 rKvd PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 13 14088 14088 14090 13988 13972 13925 13985 12113 13/14 14115 15/16 18!17 17/18 18/19 8 14088 14153 14215 14227 14412 14458 14807 14052 14050 14165 14213 14288 14359 14386 .13A 14088 14027 13984 13809 13758 14778 14870 15074 15204 15361 15516 15628 .8A 14088 14099 14070• 14009 14133 38 10/3105 '3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 TABLE S Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual I'd 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % ; Percent Projection 13 under(-) or over Actual Pd 3-6 - 8 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Pd 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.8A - 8 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Total 1993-94 Diff % Total 1994-95 Diff % 1995-98 • 1996-97 1997-98 6468 x�oc xxx 8809. xxx Total Dlif % Total Dlff °h Total Diff oA 7AA 8504 38 0.58% xx o 6653 xxx�o0c6715 )00( xxx290.44/0 6887 xxx xxxo 8596 108 1.67% 8875 88 1.00% 6684 45 31 0,88% 85 0.97% (37) (0.54)0 49 0.78% 6610 1 0.02% 8878 2233.33% 0.47% 6753 38 0.57% 6821 (86) (0.96)/° 8585 117 1.81% 6652 43 0.65% 6870 217 6790 6730 75 1.12% 8705 (202) (2.93)% 3.28% 15 0.22% 6865 0 Total 1993-94 DIM % 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 2797 xxx TOtal 2904 Diff °h Total p1(f % Total Diff)otic % 7ACUAL E.13 2785 (12) (0.43)% i4i� xxx xxx 2944 xxx xxx 3033 xxx xxx E,6 E.13 2799 2 0.07% 2844 40 1.43% 2898 8 (8) 0.28k (0.21)% 2894 (41) (1.39)°h (BO) (2.64)% 2799 (12) 2 (0.43)% 2838 32 1.14% 2912 8 0.28% 2903.6A (50) (50) (1.70)% (1.70)% 2951 (82) (2.70)% 0.07% 2844 40 1.43% 2898 8 0.21 % 2894 2953 (80) (2.64)% 2951 (82) ((2.70)% Total 1993-94 Diff % Total • 1994-95 Ditf % 1995-88 1996-97 1997-98 ACTUAL 2247 - xxx 2388 xxx. Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff Prj3E.13 2340 93 4,14% 100 xxx 4.19% 2556 xxx xxx 2782 xxx xxx 2849 xxx xxx PrJ 3E.8 2316 69 3.07% 2463 74 3.10% 2569 47 13 1.8496 21 0'75% I�u�e I■� 78 2.74% Prj3E.13 93 4.14% 2489 100 4.19% 2603 47 O.b1% 2772 (10) (0.36)% 2892 43. 1,51% P 3E.8A 2318 89 3.0796 24030.75% 74 3.10%" 2589 13 1840 2803 21 2927 T8 2.74% 0,51% 2772 10 (0.36)% 2892 43 WT:C, tall 3 1993-94 9- % Total 1994.95 Die % 1995.86 1998-97 1997-98 ACTUAL 11512 - xxx xxx 11802 xxx � Total 12113 Diff % Total ptff % Total DM' % 24 3E.13 11629 117 1.02% 161 1.38% xxx xxx 12441 xxx xxx 12769 xxx xxx 5rj 3E.8 �rj 11891 179 1.55°6 11982 180 1.53% 12152 100 39 0,83% 0.32!6 45 0.38% (38) (0.30)% 3E.13 ° 130 1.13°h 11935 133 1.13% 12392 279 2.30% 12419 12496 85) 0,18)% (0.44% 12664 (105) (0.82)% 3E.6A 11700 188 1.63% 11959 157 1.33% 12338 225 1.88% 12585 12398 45 0.38 % 12528 (2411 (1 9►% '3/05 40 10/3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT )OLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 TABLE 5 Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection Is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % a Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Pd 3.6 • 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase PO 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Pd 3.8A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Total 1998-99 DIM % Total 1999-00 DIM % 2000-01 2001-02 200203 ACTUAL Prj3E.13 6799 xxx xxx .8838 xxx xxx Total 6842 Diff xxx °h Total Diff % Total Diff Prj 3t:.6 6985 214 188 (0.54)% 6785 (73) 3.15°/0 6798 (44) xxx ° (0.84) /° 6942 8843 99) (99) xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 8902 103 (0.86)% 0 (2.93)% (121) 2,74 /o o11l (94) (1.37)°/6 (123) (1.43j% (1,77)% 6885 8835 (50) 50) (0.73)% P 3E,6A 6877 78 6767 (710) 1.55% 6905 64 ° % (87) (1.25)/0 6837 (31) (48) (0.45)% 6879 37 0,541% 6847 95 1.37 % 8877 8 (0:70)% o . (0.12 /o Total 1998-99 .Diff % Total 1999-00 Diff ° /0 2000- 2001-02 2002-03 ACTUAL 3054 xxX xxx 3191 xxxxxx Total. 3204. Diff % Total Diff % Total Dlff Prj3E.13 Prj 3E.8 2979 (80) (75) (2.64)% 3032 (80) ° (2.82) /0 3154 xxx (50) xxx (1.88)% 3426 3171 xxx 255 xxx 3656 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 2974 (80) (2.70 % (2.84)% 3032 (75) (2.48)% (�) (0.16)% ( ) (200) (7.44)% (5.84)% 3258. (398) (10.89)% P 3E.8A 2979 5 2.70 % 3048 (75) (2.48)% 3199 ;164(5) (0.156)% 3171 (200) % (5.84)% 3258 (310) (390) (8.48)% (8.48 )/o° % 3228 33258 348 Totpl 1898-99 Diff % Total 1999.00 Diff °� 2000-01 2002-03 7ACA 3089 xxx xxx 3071 xxx xxx Total 3089 Diff2001.02 xxx xxx Total093 C)IM o� Total Diff 3043 (10) (46) 2.74% 1.51% 3208 137 (10.49)%% 3249 180 5,18% 3249 xxx 156 xxx 5.04% 3161 xxx xxx 3079 (10) 2.74% 3208 10.8 137 131 4.24% 127 4.11°h 3391 230 159 7.28% 3043 46 1.51 % 3179 108 (0.32)% 1.49 % 3249 3220 160 5.18°h 3249 158 5.04%7.28% 3391 230 5.03% 131 4.24% 3220 127 0 4.11 /0 3320 159 5.03% Total Diff DIM % Total 1889-00' DIM % Total 2000-01 200IM 2002-03 7AA 12942 xxx xxx 13100 xxx xxx 13135 DIM xxx % xxx Total DIM % Tbtal Diff 13007 125 85 (0.30)% (0.82)% •13005 (95) 0 0.97/0 13201 86 0.60% 13461 13263 xxx (198) xxx (1.47)% 13702 13484 xxx x 12955 13 (1.44)% 13038 (158) (62) 0.50% 0.10% 32 0,24% (196) o(218 (1.46)% (182) 0 12899 43 1.89 % 12992 108 (0,33)% 13309 13298 174 1.32% 13276 (168) (1.25)°0 (218) (1.33)% (;.58)°% 163 1.24% 13293 ;3488 3543 _ (159) 40 10/3/05 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2005 TABLE 8 Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Diff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual % = Percent Projection Is under(-) or over Actual Pd 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Pd 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Pq 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Pd 3.8A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates ACTUAL Total Diff % Total Diff % Total 2005-06 Diff % Average Average Historical Data is grouped by PI 3E.13 8885 8722 xxx (183) xxx 788 6 xxx xxx 6881 xxx xxx Diff % K - 8, 7-9, 10-12 articulation Pd3E.8 6732 (153) (2.37)% (2.22)% 8788 8854 33 0.48% (4.17)% (0.81)%. (178) (2.88)% hoc (17) xxx (0.20)% Pattern. Pd 3E.13 PJ3E.8A 6700 (214) (3.11)% 8736. 99 19 () 1.47% 0 (0 .280 A 6768 6713 (123) (178) (1.78),6 (14) (0.12)% Articulation attem has no (0.28)% 13802 (185) (2.89)% .121)% 34 0.50 A 6758 (133) (2.58)% (1.93)% (19) (12) (0.42)% numeric Impact on of icac y (0.30)% of projection models, Total Diff1(14.10)% Total Total DIR % Total �vplff J % Total 2005-06 xxx Average Averag4 xxx ACTUAL Pd 3E.13 3858 3388 �oo� (270) xxx (7.39)% 3715 �ooc xxx 3544 • Olff � xX % xxac DIA xxx % xxx 95 PJ 3E.6 Pd3EA3 3490 (188) (4.54)% 3580. 3685 (155) (30) (4.17)% (0.81)%. 5.97% 18 0.52% (105) (3.02)% Pd,3E,6A 3490 (271) (188) (7.41)% '3560 (155) (4.17% )° 3546 3582 2 18 0.06% 0.52% (73) (2.18)h (0.28)% 13802 (2861 (4,54)% .121)% (30) (0.81)/° 3883 139 3.92% (105) Mal (3.02)% n RAW Total Diff1(14.10)% Total DIN % Total PvDIN v % ACTUAL Pd 3E.13 3181 3391 xxx xxx 3202 xxx xxx Pq 3E.6 230 159 7.28% 3393 191 8.97% Pd 3E.13 3391 230 5.03% 7,28% 3297 95 2.97% PI 3E.6A 3320 159 5.03% 3297 191 5.97% x xxx xxx 95 2.97% Total Diff1(14.10)% Total Diff % Total Difff V % ACTUAL Pq 3E.13 13702 13499 xxx xxx 13872 loot xxx Pd 313.8. (203) (1.48)% 13741 69 0.50% Pd 3E.13 13447 (180) (258) (1.17)% (1.88)% 13835 164 1.20% Pry' 3E.8A 13510 (192) (1.40)°h 13771 17 99 0.12% 0.72°!0 Total Diff1(14.10)% Diff %'- 3653 xxxxxx (150) 99 xxx 2,94% 3381 (292) 48 1,83% 3503 (180) 99 3.29% 3381 (292) 48 1 1.83% 2005-M Average Average Total DMF % DIN( % 14088 xxx (310) x xxx xxx (2.20)% (29) (0.14)°r6 13876 (412) (2.93)% (44) (0.26)% 13779 (309) (2.19)% (32) (0.28)% 13802 (2861 ro wmok .121)% .,. 3/05 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections -March 2006 BASE DATA - BUILDOC�' DULE ASSUMPTIONS: 1 Uses post 9/30/01 Build Out EsUmstes recelved from Lakeland Developer. 'a Takes area labeled Lakeland Future slated for 2005 and divides across 2005-09 2 Student Generation Factors ars updated Auburn data for 2006 as allowed per King County Ordinance 3 Includes Lea Hill known developments and Non -Lakeland developments (see Development Growth) 38 Takes area labeled Kersey Project sl~ for 20es,.��r.rl�r-- 317 Takes a B1 3 March 06 Student Generation Factors 2006 Auburn Single School Senior 07-08 2008.09 2009.10 2010-11 2011-12 297 459 617 725 834 150 231 310 365 419 167 258 345 404 464 615 949 1272 1494 1717 0.3010 0.0512 0.1510 0.0275 0.1660 0,0380 0.6180 0.1167 Buildout Data for Enro t Projections -March 2006 fano.¢ new Fro)ects -Annual NOW pupils Added & 2by Grade Level 23 6 Year Percent 61 average GRADE Average Pupils by Grade Enroll. & Level KDG 905 89 1 946 2 948 6.98% 42.82% 3 976 7.18% 4 1004 7.39% 5 1037 7.63% 6 1044 123 7 1050 7.73% 23.22% 8 1059 7.80% 9 1397 10.29% 1.0 1226 9.03% 33.96% 11 1055 7.770/9 12 1 934 6.88% Totals 13581 inn_nno� 2005-06 12006-07 12007-08 12008-09 12009-10 12010-11 12011-12 12012-13 Buildouts March 06 G:I 8 8 23 41 63 85 100 114 8 24 43 66 89 104 120 9 24 43 68 89 104 120 K 9 25 44 68 91 107 123 9 28 45 70 94 110 127 9 27 47 72 97 114 131 9 27 47 73 98 115 132. 9 27 48 73 98 116 133 13 27 48 74 99 116 134 11 36 32 63 97 131 154 177 9 27 56 86 115 135 155 8 24 48 74 99 116 133 122 1 50 1615 42 65 948 87 1 12721494 103 118 1717 Buildouts March 06 G:I % of -change 1 1.33% change +/. 187 291 B `s March. 06 Sulidout Data for Enrollment Projections TABLE 4 New Projects Pupil -March 2006 . PTdectton,Cumulatfvs NO 3.13' Grade Level ses a cohort sury/ve GRgDE model assuming 100% of 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 previous year new KDG Pro acted Pro acted Pro acted Pro acted Pro ectad 2011-12 Pro 2012-1 i enrollees move to the next 965 983 1002 1027 1050 acted Project, gradolevel. 2 1017 1035 1056 1081 1105 1067 1064 Kindergarten calculates 3 978 986 1040 1009 1060 1073 1088 1110 1123 1128 141 1146 Previous years number plus 4 5 1017 1009 1035 1100 1105 1125 1143 1161 959 1045 1040 1073 1131 1143 1150 1168 current generation based on g 1162 1181 % of total enrollment. Other1085 7 988 1077 1077 1109 Use 100% Cohort survival. IV81. g 1032 1027 1121 1172 1191 1041 1054 1146 1057 1121 1151 1145 1208 1143 1168 9 10 1425 1310 1343 .1384 1385 1283 1471 1389 1481 1479 11 12 1300 1234 1288 1307 1209 1409 1228 1313 1402 1092 1216 1150 12.07 1124 1318 1134 1220 Total 1221 TABLES New Projects Pupil % of change 0.85% Chan a +/. 119 1.64% 1 233 1.12% 162 2.17 ° 1.85% 1.86°r6 1.87°h . P ND 3.8 Grade Level action Cumulative 317 277 282 290 sea a co of sury GRADE IM assuming 100%, of prev/ous year new 2006-07 Pro acted 2007-08 2008-09 Pro acted Pro 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 enrollees move to the next K1 972 996 ectad 1022 Pro ected Pro ectad Pro acted Pro acted grade level. 1 2 1023 1047 1074 1053 1106 1083 1106 1130 Kindergarten Calculates 3 983 991 1050 1019 1078 1090 1109 1137 1141 1161 1185 1185 1189 Previous years number plus 4 5 1031 1028 1060 1122 1138 1154 1179 1203 973 1074 1075 1112 1168 1188 1193 1218 current generation based on 6 1213 1239 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1097 1013 1117 1123 1160 use 100% cohort survival. 8 1025 1126 1046 1155 1160 1228 1254 1053 1059 1163 1196 1189 1194 12581088 1223 9 1 1538 1230 1468 1397 1483 1327 1601 1533 1639 1643 11 1 12 1250 1104. 1271 1345 1203 1458 1217 1377 1480 .1108 1163 1037 1207 1135 1317 1139 1234 19,17 % of -change 1 1.33% change +/. 187 291 B `s March. 06 Buildout Data for Enro' t Projections -March 2006 ;ABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Proection Cumulative ND3.13A I by 0 de Level as a 'cohort survival, model assuming 100% of GRADE 2006.07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Previous year new KDG Pro ectad Pro ected Proacted Pro acted Pro ected Pro ected 12012-13 Projected enrollees move to the next 1 907 915 949 992 grade level. 1017 977 988 1028 1071 2 3 #: ` F 978 1040 1002 1018 1057 1093 Kindergarten calculates 4 ' 986 1009 1073 1041 1057 1090 1126 birth rate average plus 5 1017 1009 1035 1105 1073 1082 1115 959 1045 1040 1073 1143 1104 1113 current generation based on 61085 988 1111111 of total enrollment. Other 7 1032 1077 1077 1109 1172 1133 use 100% cohort survival. g 1122 1027 1121 1121 1145 1208 1041 1054 1146 1057 1151 1143 1168 9 1 1425 1343 NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1366 1471 1389 1481 1479 111 1310 1364 1283 1307 1409 1313 1402 12 1300 1234 1288 1209 1228 1318 1220 1092 1216 1150 1207 1124 1134 1221 " Total % of change 0,43°k 0.78°h 1.98"/0 TABLE rojects - Pupil Projection Cumulative change81 185 109 282 ND 3.QA =brado Level ses a 'Cohortsuryva ' of mode! esyearno GRADE 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2012-13 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 + Previous year new KDG Pro ected Pro acted Pro ectad Projected Projected Projected Proacted enrollees move to the next 1 907 915 949 992 grade level. 2 1023 982 994 1033 1076 3 983 1050 1013 1029 1068 1104 Kindergarten calculates 4 991 1019 1090 1057 1073 1106 1142 birth rate average plus 5 1031 1028 1060 1136 1103 1113 1146 973 1074 1075 1112 1188 1149 1158 current generation based on % of total enrollment, Other 6"I 1097 1013 1117 1123 1160 1228 1189 use 100% cohort survival. 7 8 :a 1025 1126 1046 1155 1160 1189 1258 1053 1.059 1163 1088 1196 1194 1223 Based on 6 year history 9 10 1538 1468 14831801 1533 1639 1643 , 11 1230 1397 1327 1345 1458 .1377 1480 12 1250 1108 1104 1183 1271 1037 1203 1217 1317 1234 1207 1136 1139 1237 Total % of change 0.87%1.48% 1.41 % 3.13° change +/- 122 210 203 457 Buildouts March 06 46 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey • Auburn School District Development Growth since 1!1101 March, 2006 SINGLE FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total 0 1 1 2 17 6 10 33 10 5 9 24 49 29 27 105 45 17 18 80 24 18 12 54 iv [ 3 7b 23 11 10 44 24 10 1 35 10 5 3 18 16 8 3 27 3 2 1 6 5 4 5T 14 2 2 4 8 21 8 141 43 18 8 18 AAl 44 0 0 2 2 18 5 10 33 12 11 8 31 25 8 8 41 28 19 25 72 17 10 12 39 11 5 12 28 22 8 7 37 26 8 111 45 18 5 6 29 25 12 11 48 53 31 34 118 14 6 8 28 16 1214 42 3 2 5 10 1 2 2 5 118 15 34 4 1 4 9 9 6 81 23 7 341 14 1 1 11 3 91 41 19 1 YL 2 7 47 4 42 "135 21 "110 2475 704 353 Student Generation Factors I 0.301 1 0.1511 0.166 U. 1175 48 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/01 March, 2006 Developments to be com leted prior page Ad itional Studen11 201 221---8-31 Alder Meadows 30 1 29 Aspen Meadows 21 1 20 Hazel Park 15 5 10 Lakeland: Vista Heights 125 4 121 Riverpointe 118 4 114 Marchini Meadows 83 18 65 2006 cwt ana u Alicia Glenn 31 Anderson.Acres 14 Backbone Ride 7 Beaver Meadows 60 Brandon Meadows 55 Brandon Place 78 Cambridge Pointe 26 Daljit Dhaliwal Plat 8 Estes Park 31 Hansen Development 31 Harpreet Kanq 8 Hazel View 20 Kendall Ridge 109 Kent Impound Area 386 Xemey 3 Proiect 373 Lawson Place 14 Little Fields 8 Mystery Heights 6 New Hope Lutheran Plat 8 Pacific Meadows 44 Plemmons Develo ment 8 Vintage Place 25 Vlhllow Place 18 * 49 4 5 5 19 7 3 3 13 23 2 2 9 4 19 21 77 10 18 20 73 1125 13 14 51 0 31 9 5 5 59 651 242 4 2 2 9 7 4 4 15 23 11 13 47 4 2 2 7 10 5 5 20 481 241 26 8 e 0 31 9 5 5 19 0 14 4 2 2 0 7 2 1 1 9 4 0 60 18 9 10 37 0 55 17 8 91 34 0 78 23 12 131 48 0 26 8 4 4 16 0 8 2 1 1 5 0 31 9 5 5 19 0 31 9 5 5 19 0 8 2 1 1 5 0 20 6 3 3 12 0 109 33 16 18 67 0 386 116. 58 64 238 0 373 112 561 62 230 0 14 4 2 2 9 0 8 2 1 1 5 D 6 2 1 1 4 D 8 2 1 fl 5 3 44 13 7 7 27 8 2 1 1 5 25 8 4 4 18 5 31 31 1368 4121 2061 2271 15 11 845 Auburn ; ool District Development Growth since 1/1/01 March, 2006 MULTI FAMILY 2006 Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total 5 5 4 2 12 0.3750 0.2500 0.1250 0.7500 5 0 3 8 0.0298 0.0000 0.0179 0.0476 4 3 3 1 9 0.0725 0.0435 0.0145 0.1304 12 4 5 12 0.0435 0.0326 0.0543 0.1304 0 4 20 0.0976 0.0325 0.0325 0.1626 3 2 2 4 0.0000 0.0198 0.0198 0.0396 13 1 7 5 9 0.0385 0.0128 0.0641 0.1154 6 13 33 .0.0884 0.0476 0.0884 0.2245 54 4 5 15 0.0638 0.0426 0,0532 0.1596 28 40 122 D" Street Plat 32 0 32 0 'aehnrich Addition 7 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 Vorle Condominiums 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 58 58 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 Projected New Students from Multi Family 60 �vvv m®.m �doo�vv©.e D" Street Plat 32 0 32 0 'aehnrich Addition 7 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 Vorle Condominiums 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 58 58 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 Projected New Students from Multi Family 60 2006-2007 - 2011-2012 Ew=MPwkEkmmWySjft ire fti Ekmmtxy scWW ire rk Oe„mtuy Searing unincorporated 2ng County Ppsirfents Andl?fAfents of the Cities of Kfnt, Covington Au6urn, BfackDiamoru� Mapfe galley, 9;Zrnton, and'Searlac, Washington .Aprif2006 Me11t School DIS�y�' SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 - 2007 2011- 2012 April 2005 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 a Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynea Mooney, Facilities Departrnent Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fosjord, Purchasing Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by .lana Tucker Kent -"001 Distrid Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan Aprit .2006 Kent school nisi Sk Tear Capitaf FaciCities Plan rIa6fe of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service g I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing. Schools 11 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 VII Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V.I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 I Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was -prepared using data available in the spring of 2006 for the 2005-2006 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Blade Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apel 2006 Page 2 Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state.' Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,809.38. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2004, full head count was 27,573. (Full Headcount -reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Pian. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. (Cent School District Six -Year- Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Tawe 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Tawe l) 8.41% of 21,778 King County live births in 2001 is.forecastfor.1,832 students (916 FTE @ .5) expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2006. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.41% of King. County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six- year period. peeranee Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students"] and non -disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with altemative funding for the second half of the day. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on markettgrowth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of SeaTac, Renton & Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city limits of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2DD6 Page 4 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR (Continued) "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .444 Middle School .148 Senior High .252 Total .&l4 Multi -Family Elementary .293 Middle School .058 Senior High .094 Total .445 The student generation factor is based _on a survey of 3,746 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School District Six-year capital FacliGes Plan April 0)06 Page 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER P 223 F. T. E. ENROLLMENT HISTORY ' LB = Live Births LB in 1985 LB In 1938 LB In 1987 LB In 1968 L8 M 1989 LB In 1990 LB In 1991 LB In 1992 LB In 1993 LB In 1994 LB In 1995 LB In 1996 LB In 1997 LB October FTE Enrollment 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 .2401 in 1998 Ls in 1999 Le in 2000 King County Live Births 2 19,825 19,999 20,449 21,289 ?,2,541 23,104 23,002 23,188 2002 2003 2004 2005 Increase/Decrease 851 174 450 22,355 2 345 2.193 21,573 21,846 22,195 22 88 22, 0 840 1,252 583 •102 188 -833 Kindergarten / Birth % J 8.88% 9.49% 9.40% 9.07% 8.47% 8.54% 8,44% 8:38% 8.27% 8.56% 8.25% 8,41 % 8 73 06 •188 480 Kindergarten' a Z ��% 1.06% 8.33% 8.41 880 949 982 965 955 987 Grade 1 971 972 925 942 900 907 873 894 917 11852 1,945 2,029 2,017 1,967 1,975 2,152 2,085 2,064 1,989 2,069 943 Grade 2 1,773 1,944 1,935 1,922 1,851 1,954 1938 1,998 2,048 1,937 2,011 1,979 2,194 2,095 .2,078 2,015 2,067 1,936 1,965 1,935 1981 Grade 3 1,824 11866 1,950 1,972 1,965 1,959 2,025 2,058 2,208 2,111 2,098 2 Grade 4 1,793 1,916 11900 1,939 1,942 ,040 2,055 1,975 2,020 1962 Grade 5 2,012 1,966 2,084 2,045 2,222 2,086 2,168 2,068 2,072 2,057 2024 1,702 1,865 1,911 1,907 1,899 1,924 1,988 2,023 2,108 2,037 2,251 2,110 2,149 2,067 2,102 Grade 6 1,629 1,733 1,885 11951 1,915 1,895 1,924 2,036 2,045 2,119 2,056 2090 Grade 7 1,624 1,720 1,812 11915 1,948 1,925 1,898 1,982 2,063 2,081 2,208 2,;51 2,151 2,205 2,139 2164 Grade 8 1,545 1,628 1,724 1,799 1,882 1,941 1,827 1,938 1,970 2,015 2 23 2,380 2,209 2,243 2200 Grade 9 1,483 1,612 1,689 1,716 1,800 1,894 1,963 1,931 1,925 2,102 2,208 2144 52 2,079 2,351 2,221 2293 Grade 10 1,468 1,480 1,663 1,698 1,690 1,785 1,851 1,877 1,953 2,045 ,2 2,404 2,309 2,705 2767 Grade 11 1,360 1,400 1,409 1,537 1,529 11606 1,1381 1,797 1,849 1,782 1,770 2,064 2,039 2,207 2,124 2173 Grade 12 1,202 1,255 1,290 1,340 1,368 1,430 1,465 1,507 1,832 1,537 14 1835 1,823 1,787 1,807 1799 32 1 439 1,475 1,466 1,446 1475 Total Enrollment' 20,135 21,312 22,222- 22,803 22,794 23,323 23,792 24.560 24,882 25,060 25,238 25,333 25,354 25,358 25,770 25,809 Yearly FTE increase 918 1,178 809 562 -10 529 469 768 322 Cumulative Increase 916 2,094 3,003 178 178 95 21 4 412 39 3,585 3,575 4,104 4,574 5,341 5,683 1 5,841 81019 6,115 6,135 6,140 6,552 6,591 FTE enrollment counts have been rounded to the nearest whet= mmd_ ` �• • I'll $WWIwarten students are reported at .5 FTE although most elementary schools now serve some full day Kindergarten programs. This number Indicates actual births in King County 5 Years prior to enrollment year as updated by King Co Health Dept KSD percentage based on actual KI 3 P 223 Enrollment Report excludes Early Childhood Education ("ECE" g 82^ or Birth to 2 Preschool Handicapped) ndergarten enrollment 5 yeses tater, October 2004 P 223 Headcount = " PPed) and college•only Running Start students. 26,970 d Full Headcount = 27,573. Full Headcount Includes Kindergarten, Early Childhood Education 8, college -only Running Start students at 1,0 Headcount Kent S& ".I Distrlet Six-year Capital Facilities Plan TskI le 1 April 20r ,l Page 6 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Grade 7 ACTUAL I P R O J E C T i O N October 2005 1 2006 1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 King County Live Births 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,874 23,100 23,200 ' Increase I Decrease 480 -709 85 568 443 226 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.41% 8.41% 8.60% 8.60% 8.59% 8.601A, 8.59% 2'3 Kindergarten FTE @ -5 943 916 940 964 983 993 997 Grade 1 1,938 2,003 1,961 2,012 2,063 2;103 2,124 Grade 2 1,981 1,975 2,056 2,013 2,065 2,117 2,157 Grade 3 1,962 2,019 2;028 2,110 2,066 2.119 2,172 Grade 4 2,024 1,976 2,048 2,057 2,139 2,095 2,148 Grade 5 2,090 2,066 2,033 2,106 2,115 2,198 2,154 Grade 6 2,164 2,162 2,151 2,117 2,192 2,201 2,287 Grade 7 2,200 2,226 2,250 2,238 2,203 2,281 2,290 Grade 8 2,293 2,249 2,300 2,325 2,312 2,276 2,356 Grade 9. 2,767 2,857 2,827 2,887 2,917 2,901 2,856 Grade 10 2,173 2,173 2,268 2,240 2,286 2,310 2,297 Grade 11 1,799 1,841 1,866 1,942 1,917 1,956 1,977 Grade 12 1,475 1,391 1,448 1,463 1,521 1,502 1,532 Total FTE Enrollment 25,809 11c142l3l4 25,854 26,176 26,474 26,779 27,052 27,347 - - Yearly Increase 39 45 322 298 305 273 295 Yearly Increase % 0.15% 0.17% 1.25% 1-14% ,1.15% 1.02% 1.09% Cumulative Increase 39 84 406 704 1,009 1,282 1,577 un Time Equivalent (FTE} 25 809 f 15,11F1111 1 26,176 26 474 26,779 27052 27.347 ' Kindergarten projection based on King County actual rive birth 2 percentage and proportional growth from new consiructiorr. Kuidergarten FTE enrolknent projection at .5 is caked by using the Disbes Percentage of King Cwnty Gve births. a 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous Year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. Oct. 2005 P223 FTE is 25,809 & Headcount is 26,970_ Fun student Count with ECE Preschool 8 Rurrnirg Start = 27,573. G R O W T H PROJECTIONS Adjustments for current economic M;s For facilities planning purposes this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Fackws Plan Table 2 April 2006 Page 7 I i I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The .standard of service identifies the program year, the class size; the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the., same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (see Appendix A, e & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also . incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for kwnpntqry Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 -.6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourtWiffh grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continueM Kent School District Six -Year Capital F30'6ties Plan April, 2006 page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (contintied) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (sA) Program for severely behavior -disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities {ASC-oD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten (Magnet K Programs) Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs - Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is .reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these spectral programs and "pull-out" space: must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these. modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students ; The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7"' and 10 th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative. 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7"' & 10'h grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 -12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided . in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (conga.) Kent School District sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) 'a Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Leamers (E L L) - Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine. Biology, General Science, etc. Integrated Programs "& Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs —Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science - Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc.. Business Education — Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DELA, Sales & Marketing, etc. Material Sciences - Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machirm- Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic & Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized pecial¢ed classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 1 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Spa a or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apri(2OD6 Page 1lJ I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,824 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,345. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I L Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes. It has also been updated to estimate new capacity for building additions at the high schools. It includes preliminary capacity for Mill Creek Middle School which re -opened in the fall of 2005. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Leaming Center and Grandview Elementary) serves grades 1. through 17 with transition, choice and home :school assistance programs. It is'located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plain. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six-year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Year SCHOOL opened ABR ADDRESS 2005-2006 Program Cvacity Carriage Crest Elementary 19W CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 265W Timtreriane Way SE, Covington 98042 428 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, CovkVton 98042 478 CresMrood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 480 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 -- -- 480 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 490 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 2161h Street, Kent 98031 Fanwood Elementary - 1969 _ FW 166W - 148th Avenue SE. Renton 98058 420 Glerxrd9e Elementary 1996 GR 19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 — _ 456 Grass take Elementary 1971 GL 28700 -191st Place SE, Kent 98042 490 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE. Kent 98042 460 Jenkins Creek _Elementary _ 1987 _ JC 26915 - 18M Avenue SE. Covington 98042 426 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South. Kent 98032 --- 466 - Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 468 Meadow Ridge_Elementary 1994 _MR 2771_0 -108th Avenue SE Kent 98031 466 Meridian Elementary 1939 1W 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Ken( 98042 538 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 492 Neely-O'&ien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 442 Patrther Lake Elementary_ 1938__PL__20_831-1_08th Avemre S_E, Kent Wwl 384 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 --- — 498 -- Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kern 98031 540 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18 030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Wow Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Hill Elementary 1960 _ SH 26025 Woodiand Way South. Keit 98031 464 Scenic Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 418 hook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 -100th Avenue SE. Kent 98031 440 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 -132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL ' 13,314 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 929 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 775 Meeker Middle School _ 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Skeet. Renton 98058 Meridian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 -120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031- - _841 -- 910 Will Creek MS (former Kent Jr K) 2 2005 11952 MC 620 North Central Avenue. Kent 98032 768 Northosood Middle School 19% NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 935 Sequoia Fiddle School 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street. Kent 98031 832 Middle School TOTAL — 5,990 Kent -Meridian Senior Kgh School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 Kentlake Senior 8th 1 •� EflBh �� f 997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Keri 98042 1,812 Kentridge Senior high School 1968 KR 12430 SE 20Street, Ken( 98031 2,302 Kentwood Senior high School1981 KW 25800 -164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,187 Senior Kgh TOTAL — 8,104 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 1:27, sChanges to capacity reflect program changes and new bdiding additions at high schools. Keri Junior High was dosed for 2004-05 for remodel and re purpose_ It re -opened in 2005 as MB Creek Middle School Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 1-12. The school was formerly known as Kent Learning. Center d, Grandview Elementary. Kent SdW District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2006 Page 12 LO N Z. N C O n Z °U H ��m0 C 0. O OU 19 Op OD 02 C OC pF ^O 'Z a.VVV' z.° o i 0 n v V N C U • Y W CY DFiID o OID Z� > • v C s 8a o €• _° y o£0 o W Z' N yC �C� N St" � T _ • o �WN C •m RE �D po VS- 3S DAY PUZCt OW • �L OC•Rb at L Ylx-j— S— 01. 11 off pa• Er. �E• Q 3SeMI44901 • > aW Y, 06 80ai > F ,sC • ob ao Y N � N O n O OU 19 Op OD 02 C OC pF >pi • • 0-02 UW • Y CY DFiID o OID WO As C Ci m �\ T _o0 � Q Y 0 •W C D15 <p U , C X40" AIO11se/Yt z• J• 00 f b- Y� v N 3 ar h O Zw :G c� 0013 • � s: -W tD Uock • O O.� o�u CD Y:C hl � N m 0 U Ob 0 Q yh�3 000> LC [� ifV �j _Q CD CD 7 C .L 0 :. ►- _0 0 � E !C C C tlr 7 Cb Y COr•,'V N tent School District Six -Year Capital Facllities Plan April 2006 Page 13 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2006, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • Additions to three high schools have added capacity for students from new development and 9"' Grade students moving to the high schools. Voters recently approved funding for further classroom capacity to be added at Kentlake and Kent -Meridian High Schools. • Reconfiguration to 7"' and 8"' grades provides additional capacity at middle schools. The Board has approved renovation and re -configuration of Sequoia Middle School to serve as an Alternative High School in 2007-08. • Kent Junior High was temporarily dosed for one year in 2004-05 for re -purpose and remodel. In 2005, the school was renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School (* 7a) with a new 7"' Grade Technology Academy program. The voters have recently approved funding for Phase 11 of the renovation of Milt Creek MS. • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther take Elementary School and a future new Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary► and high school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. ' Sites for Potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 16. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design' plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull - Outs and turn-arounds for school buses. included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see T" 4j Voter approved bond issues for $105AM in 1990 and $130M in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding. is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some Property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact. fees will also be applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended teaming opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service; and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent Sctwd District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 14 a on KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity e� acted .. SCHOOL /FACILITY. /....� q %for SITE . LOCATION T ...-:.: ' Status Com*tion Program new D ate Growth ELEMENTARY(Numbers assigned (o future schools may no( correlate wsh number of existhg schools. Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) To be rebugt on current site Replacement Planning 2009 500 25% Elementary # 31 (Funded) To be determined 2 New — Planning 20'10 500 100% Elementary Site (Unfunded) t To be determined 2 Site Planning 2007 500 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 -832 to Alternative High School SENIOR HIGH Classroom additions at three Ifigh Schools Kent-Merkfian for growth & reconfiguration (Funded) Kentridge Kentwood Sewoia Alternative f School diddle Schod (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street. Kent Classroom additions at two high spools (F) Kendake & Kent -Meridian TEMPORARY FACILITIES (Rebcatables For placement as needed SUPPpRT FACILITIES Bus Facility (UMunded)1 Near Kern -Meridian High School 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) 5 Covingtort area West (Hapeson-Wtkstrom) 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.) 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nice site) 12 South Central site (Plem ons-Yeh-Wms) Additions Uwmed 200pD6 386 75% Additions LWMB . 2004-06 1,000 75% Additions Ulm 20044)6 896 75% Renaratbri Planning 2007-(* 500 75% Additions flog 2007/2008 —200 75% Additional capacity New Planning 2006 4 24 - 31 each 100% New Planning TBD 2 N / A SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent'98042 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 16820 SE 240. Kent 98042 SE 332 &204 SE, Kent 96042 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98M SE 286th Street & 124th Ave. SE, Kent Notes: 1 Unhmded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16. Othersite locations are . Parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26. 1:Land Use T ,lures Elementary City of Covington Elementary King County TBD 2 City of Covington Elementary King County Secondary ling county Elementary King County TBD 2 ling County TBD 2 Feng County Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities plan Table 4 Apel 2006 Page 15 L 0 L) O L JD N - Q ?X v DID C ♦ �G Im • 1Uf op c� 4` v$ • e• is— p - 3S OraW9tmm o 0 , 0 • >~ Qo o m J T 3s e,�s wovt o o y$/ • o ut 1L •W y 2w A IS e+aP-TCt €c 35eraa O� 2,15b O� €[[ � OC ��4 o f r •DO YS VC0 •V �Si • Nt Siu is E� W � • loll f 3S eraweo► •I 1110 !P i� Vis• _ 3S era wool aw _ Y lu Lugo AGIPA �T L os �T N 3O m In 21Y O �oFrIld Y ent School District Sit -Year Capital Facilities Plan fa .9. L YakS Yc JG ' A * 12006 Page 16 VI Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate tern, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During.the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kerd SGxool District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 17 V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison cha rts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A-" on pages 19 - 22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is recognized as the "enrollment count date" for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2005 was 25,809.38 which represents an increase of 39 FTE over the previous October. Kindergarten students are counted at .5 and P223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College -only Running Start students. (see TaWs5&5A-"onpages19-22) On October 1, there were 586 students in 11th and 12th grade participatini) in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 315 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are thus excluded from the FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in..the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2005 totals 27,573 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. This reflects an increase of 233 actual students compared to October 1, 2004. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -e -C on Pages 19 - 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year capital Faa06es Plan April 2006 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 ! 201 2007 2007-2008 2006-2009 + 2009-2010 120W.2011 2011-2012 Permanent Program Capacity' 24,767 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Classrooms added at 3 high schools (F) Kent -Meridian - Kentridge - Kentwood Estimated Program Capacity 2,282 P R O J E C T 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 Classroom additions at Kentlake 3 Kent -Meridian (F) 150 50 s Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Alternative High School in 2007 -OB Change to UKk to school Capacity -832 High School Program Capacity added 500 s MIN Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as AN Creek Wiiddle Scholl b Technology Academy Wa in FN 2005 Estimated Program Capacity 775 Replacement with w1creased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) -364 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Prow- Capaaty Subtotal 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 28,328 Interim Relocatable Ca Relocatabfe capa* R"Ufmd 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 aliddte school Rebcalapte capwity Regntred 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S-9- High Rshoa*WA& CWacdy Regwed 124 186 0 0 0 0 0 Total Relocatahle Capacity Required a s 124 186 0 24 0 0 0 I Capacity is based on standard of service for Program capacity and updated periodicaNy<D reflect program deranges. 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (i.e. 112 day Kindergarten student = .5). 3 In Fall 2004, 91h grade moved to the h schoots 4 high which Provided increased mpa* at Middle School level. Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-08. 5 e MIR Creek Middle School re -opened in Fag 2005 with a Technology Academy se rA9 7th grade students from ocher service areits. 2005-2006 total classroom rebeatable eapecif)r is 1,345 Kent School District Six Yew Capital Facrities plat Table 5 April 2006 page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 2006-2007 1 Zo07-2008 2OW2W9 2OW2010 1 201D-2011 2011-2012 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Ca ' 5,822 8,104 8,104 8,754 81804 lChanges to High School Ca ��] Classrooms added at three high schools (Funded) Kent -Meridian - Kentridge - Kentwood Estimated program capacity 2,282 r Alternative High School added through reconfiguration of Sequoia Middle School for 2007-08 (F) Estimated program capacity 5500 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 150 Classroom additions at Kent Meridian High School (F) F5i] 8;804 8,804 Subtotal 8,104 8,104 8,754 8,804 8,804 8,804 8,804 Repacity Required 1 124 186 0 0 0 0 0 -- - LTOTALCAPACITY ' 8,228 8,290 8,754 8,804 8,804 8,804 8,804 FTE Et�tOLLMENT PROJECTION 2 8,214 8,262 8,409 8,532 8,641 8,669 8,662 (SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 14 28 345 272 163 135 142 Number of Relocatables Required 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 Some Relocatables used for Classroom and program purposes. t Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students. a Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. ° Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Altemative High School in 2007=08. Kent School District Six Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2006 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 2006-2007 1 2007-2008 1 20oa-20os 1 2009-2010 D -2o» 2011-2012 Actual P R O JE C T E D [Middle School Permanent Capaci ' 5,215 5,990 5,990 5.158 5,158 5,158 5,158 [Changes to Middle School Capacity 4 Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Milt Creek Middle School #7a in Fan 2005 Program capacity added 775 s Sequoia Middle School win be reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-08 Program capacity offline - moved to high school -832 Subtotal 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 5,1;58 5,158 Relocatable Capacity Required' TOTAL CAPACITY ' a 3 FTE ENROLLMENT =PR0:iE=CTl0N-- SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 0 0 0 M 5,990 5,158 193 4.475 4.550 1.497 1,515 608 0 0 0 0 158 5.158 595 5 No Classroom Relocatahies required at this time. Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. 158 5,158 601 512 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program chautges. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from aq service areas. ned in S Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-013 and middle school boundaries will be reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide. Kent School District Sero -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2006 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR Zoos-20062ooG-2007 2007 -loos 2008 200y Zoos 2010 201cF 2011 2olt 2012 Actual P R O J E C T E D kementary Permanent Capacity ' 13,314 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13#866 14,366 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes 1. Elementary Capaci �] Replacement with increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)' -364 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded)s 503 Subtotal 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,3166 14,366 [Re:�tableCaacKly Required j 1 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 , TOTAL CAPACITY 2 �13,73O3,730 13.366 13.39' 1R W. A 4A W-9 .I o.. FTE ENROLLMENT'lpRUlECTION s 13,102 13,117 13,217 13,379 13,623 .13,826 1 IbUKFLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 628 613 149 11 243 540 327 Number of Retocatables Required 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 One Classroom Relocatable required in 2008-09. Some Relocatables used for dassroom and program purposes. Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes - 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 1-12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. a FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @ .5 & excluding ECE). Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. Panther Lake Elementary will dose for two years and be rebuilt on the existing site with increased capacity. s Site selection for Elementary #31 is pending review of location and capacity needs. Kent School District Sm Year Capital Faa*Wm plan Table 5 C Apra 21)06 Page 22 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2006 - 2007 through 2011 - 2012. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula, Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the District. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This partially funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9'' grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received state matching funds and has utilized impact fees for the senior high school additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity to be rebuilt on its current site, construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth, Phase I1 renovation for Mill Creek Middle School, and renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-08. Construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at the high school level. Some impact fees will be utilized for all new construction. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Pian, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Faaftes Plant April 2006 Page 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN vvnvv4 2007 Secured uImpact p a cst008 eA1c :a 22010 2011 •i• : '; Locaoe l8Stts a2008 az e FACILITIES i..: 'i•. :i :i•. •,• i 1• li ;Ur 0rCee8OT LO81 F •�•l ii •:,:, HPERMANENT i.�nSstlp`ibred'i saiimgted': 162 Additions to Senior Highs F $39,800,000 ' $39,800,000 $23,300,000 Addition to Kentiake HS $16,500,000 F $6,000,000 : ' aAddition to Kent -Meridian 56,b00,000 $4,600,000 $1,400,000 F $3,000,000 ij ' Panther Lake Elem Replacement $3,000,000 $2,350,000 $650,000 F $17,100,000 $17,100,000 $13,680,000 112 Elementary # 31 $3,420,000 F $15,000,000 $18,000,000 $13,000,000 Elementary Site U '' $5,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES $2,500,000 , F `f 3a o Additional Relocatables U $194,000 $199,860`` $206,000 $212,000 $109,200 $112,500 i' 2 relocatables 2 relocalables 2 relocatables 2 relocatables 1 relocatable 1 relocatable $1,033,560 $310,430 OTHER $723,130 N/A Totals $39,994,000 $8,899,880 $3,208,000 $17,312,000 $18,109,200 $112,500 F Funded $87,433,560 $57,240,430 $0 $30,193,130 = U = Unfunded ' Based on estimates of actual or future construction costs from Faciiloes Department. (See Page 25 for Cost Baals Summa = The District anticipates receiving state matchi r, fi—A. summary) IV— prqem. Facility needs are pending review, These funds may be secured with Impact fees, ` Cost of Relocatables based on current cost of $97,000 in 2005-08 and adjusted for 3% Inflation factor for future years, a Fees in this column are based on amount bf fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tekbje 6 April 2006 ^jge 24 V -I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary - For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with inflation factor, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost [M:illr:enniunm Elementary #30-o n 2000 $12,182,768 urent cost of Elementary #31 $15,550,000 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2010 18 Construction cost of the additions to high schools: :Senior High School Additions Projected Cost1: Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $11,300,000 Addition to Kentlake $6,000,000 Addition to Kentridge $16,650,000 Addition to Kentwood $14,850,000 Construction cost of additions to $48,800,000 4 High Schools Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment for 2006 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of initiative 695. Kent school District Six -Year Capital FacTrties Pian April 2006 Page 25 MCN I buMOOL DISTRICT• No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased or Built on within last 10 Years # on Map School / Site I Year Open Purchased Elementary Glenridge Elementary 1996 Urban Kent Elem (New - #27a replaced old Kent Elem) 1999 Urban Emerald Park Elementary 1999 Urban Millennium Elementary 2000 2 I Urban Site - Shady Lake (sowers assemblage) 1995 Middle School Urban Northwood Middle School 1996 10/Urban Mill Creek MS (Kent JH) / McMillan St. assemblage 2002 1211 Urban So Central Site - Unincorp KC (Plemmons, Yeh, Wms) 1999 I Location Acreage Cost 19405120 Av SE, Renton 98058 11.65 $1,498,334 24700 64 Av S, Kent 98032 10.53 $2,559,786 11800 SE 216, Kent 98031 12.60 $1,010,000 11919 SE 270, Kent 98031 11.54 $1,133,500 17426 SE 192, Renton 98058 15.76 $508,662 Elementary Site Subtotal 62.08 $6,710,282 17007 SE 184 St, Renton 98058 24.42 $655,138 411.432 McMillan St.. Kent 98032 1.23 $844,866 E of 124 SE btw 286-288 PI (UKC) 39.70 $1,935,020 Middle School Site Subtotal 65.35 $3,435,024 11 / Urban Senior High 6 / Urban 5 / Urban K -M High School Addition (Kent 6 & Britt Smith) Kentlake High School (Kombol Morris) Kentwood Sr Hi Addition (sandhu) Site - Covington area (Halleson & Wikstrom) 2002 & 2003 10002 SE 25% Straet 1997 21401 SE 300 St, Kent 98042 1998 18807 SE 258th Street 2000& 2004 15435 SE 256 St, Covington 98042 6.31 40.00 3.83 36.36 $ ,000 $537 $537,534 $302,117 $31977,464 $80,159 Senior High Site Subtotal 86.50 $8,127,115 Note, All rural ;iter were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area, Numbers corns and to locations on Site Sa2nkLMa!lIRnFPsge 16. Pro rhes irchased or to 1994 1 So. King County Activity Center (Nike site) purchased prior to 1994. 4 / Urban Site - Covington area North re......,-..-__ ,... ,,, ,.,a,w�m mo! 1964 3 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard) 1992 7 / Rural Site - South of Covington (Scamelia) 1993 8 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West) 1993 9 Old Kent Elementary. replaced and currantly Ismm „t Kent : District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan rg cosvacre I Total Average Cost / Acre $128,612 $243,095 $80,159 $98,224 $32,276 $1.08,091 Elem site average $26,828 $686,883 $48,741 $52,563 Middh $chi Site Avg. $524,564 $13,438 $78,882 $109,391 $93,955 Sr HI Site Average Total Acreage & Cost Total Avenue Cost r Ao m 213.93 $18,272,421 I $85,413 T ... 37 April 2k,„ Page 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR -ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.444 Elementary Middle School Grades 7 - 8 ( ) 0.148 0.293 School Senior High (Grades 9 -12) 0.252 .Middle 0.058 Senior High Total 0.844 0.094 Total 0.445 Projected Student Capacity Elementary 500 Middle School 1,065 Senior High 1,000 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Middle School (required) 21 Senior High (required) 32 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary • Middle School Senior High • ' See cost basis on Pg. 25 Temporary Facility Square Footage OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary _ 90 Middle School 117 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary $108,091 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 $18,.000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $0 Elementary @ 24 $97,000 $48,800,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $97,000 Elementary 71,652 Middle School 27,000 Senior High 20,272 Total 4% 118,924 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 651,273 Senior High 1,007,522 Total 96% 3,134,731 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,547,588 Middle School 678,273 Senior High 1,027,794 Total 3,253,655 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 55.94% Area Cost Allowance - CosUSq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $154.22 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence - $263,362 District Average Assessed Value Mufti -Family Residence $82,971 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.74 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 4.39% April 2006 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) I Required Site Ameage I Ave A 1 (Elementary) 11 A 2 (Middle School) 21 A 3 (Senior High) 32 x Student Generation Factor we Site Cost/Acre I Fa My Car $108.091 500 $0 1,065 50 1,000 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Fc Constnrdioo Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor B 1 (Elementary) $18.01)0,000 500 0.444 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.148 B 3 (Senior High) $48.800,000 2,282 0252 0.844 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Fac lily Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Squar FacrW Cod FacRy CW ity Student Factor C 1 (Elementary) $97,000 24 0.444 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.148 C 3 (Senior High) $97,000 31 0-252 0.844 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Area Cost Aiowance x SPI Square Feet Area Cost Allowance DI (Elemerdary) $154.22 D 2 (Middle School) $15422 D 3 (Senior High) $154.22 Student Factor J 0.444 $1.055.83 0.148 S0 0252 S0 0.844 A—> $1,055.83 tape Ratio J 0.96 $15,344.64 0.96 S0 0.96 $5,173.40 B $20.518.04 tage Ratio 0.04 $71.78 0.04 $0 0.04 $31.54 C —^> $103.32 student x District Match % x Student Factor 34. Ft. ! Student ( DMid Match Stodart Fedor $263,362 90 0.5594 0.444 $3.447.38 117 0 0.148 S0 130 0.5594 0.252 _ $2,82623 Fee Recap D > Tax Credit per Single Family Residence = 56.273.60 Average SF Residential Assessed Value $263,362 Current Capital LOW Rate / $4,000 $1.74 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.39% Years Amoriaed (10 Years) 10 TC . —> $3.636.33 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/ Site Value Dwelling thtNs 0 0 FC —> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $1,055.83 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $20,518.04 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $103.32 Subtotal D = Slate Match Credit per Residence $21,677.19 $6.273.60 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,636.33 Subtotal - $9,909.94 Total Unfunded Need $11,76726 50% Developer Fee Obligation $5,884 FC = Facility Credit (if aPpkable} 0 District Adjustment tSee Page 25 for explanation) ($956) Net Fee Obfigatioo per Single Family Residence $4.928 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 28 :r. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Factiiy Capacity) x Student Generation Factor I Required Site Acreage i Average She CosVAae I Fadity Car A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 A 2 (A+tiddle School) 21 s0 1,065 A 3 (Senior HO) 32 $0 1,000 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -family Residence Unit Dwelling Units Formula: ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capadty) x Student Factor) x (Permanent /Total Squai Construction Cost F.Tity Capacity Student Factor B 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0,298 B 2 (kindle .School) so 1,065 0.058 B 3 (Senior Koh) $48,800,000 2,282 0.094 0.5594 0.445 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit $1,145.61 Formula: ((Fac slily Cost /.Facility Capacity) x Student factor) x (Temporary/ Total Squan IL FwRy Cost I Fa.W Capacity I Student Factor C 1 (Elementary) $97,000 24 0.293 C 2 (kiddie School) $0 29 0.058 C 3 (Senior KO) $97,000 31 0.094 0.445 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x I Area Cost ft -ane I SP1 sq. Ft. / stm D 1 (Elementary) $154.22 90 D 2 (Middle School) $15422 117 D 3 (Senior FTigh) $154.22 130 Tax Credit per Multt-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value Cement Capital Levy Rabe 1$1,000 Current Bond Mterest Rate Years Amortized (10 Years) Developer Provided Facility Credit Fee Recap A = Site ACquisition per Mul"amily Urn B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit Subtotal D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal ShKWA Factor) 0.293 $696.75 0.058 $0 0-094 $0 0.445 . A—.> $696.75 'ne Ratio J 0.96 $10,126.08 0.96 S0 0.96 $1,929.76 B --> $12,055.84 tags Ratio J 0.04 $47.37 0.04 $0 0.04 $11.77 C --> $59.13 Match % x Student Facior Dwelling Units District Match % Sgident FacW $696.75 0.5594 0.293 $2,274.96 0 0.058 S0 0.5594 0.094 $1,05433 $1,145.61 D —> $3,329.19 $82,971 $1.74 4.39% 10 TC —> Faciliy / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC —> $696.75 $12,055.84 $59.13 $12,811.73 $3,329.19 $1,145.61 - $4,474.80 Total Unfunded Need $8.336.93 50% Developer Fee Obligation $4,168 FC = Faciliy Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($1,134) Net Fee Obligation per Mutti-Fa"y Residence Unit $3,034 $1,145.61 0 Kent Sdool District Six Year Capital Faaffties Plan April 2006 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2005 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan') is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2005 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School, a future new elementary and classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School and Phase If of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sake, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Student enrollment forecast is _ updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections continue to reflect need for future additional capacity at elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to reflect changes and grade level reconfiguration. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM yPe I FROM I TO I Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.482 0.444 Revised Single Family (SF) MS 0.161 0.148 Revised $1.74 SH 0.284 0.252 Revised Market Rate Total 0.927 0.844 Change to fee - $153 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.293 0.293 Revised but no change. Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.069 0.058 Revised SH 0.114 0.094 Revised Total 0.476 0.445 hate Match Credit 54.29% 55.94% Per OSPI (+11.65%) kreq Cost Allowance (Boeckh Index) $129.8.1 $154.22 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $242,558 $263,362 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums 8 Apts. MF $76,682 $82,971 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.84 $1.74 Per icing Courdy Assessment General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.57% 4.39% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,775 $4,928 Change to fee - $153 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $2,940 $3,034 change to fee - $94 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 30 M Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent Sd'ool District Six -Year CapW Facirdies plan Rpri! 2006 Page 31 N r M w m N m� V �• et Y r N ED W �W{ � a Q' a W M h O O O h IA n O O In b VO h O O b h OD O O n O in Y O N M f� fV h Y l7 O Qa1h oD 0 fV �N �D ►� G ^ pj p iG lV h N M W m m O O p W i a < c v v a a v v v a a v v v v c O O O O O N O O O O v v N O Q w O O N Q n N N P N v v O V n O O C-4 o N. O O O o O O O Co O M O O O• O r r M O r N N O a M O O r N r a r N N Y N r N N N r — r M O Q• Q N M r O M M N M A to GD Y 'Of O < 11� IT Y h f� m � W "31 an w f Z O O O v O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O N M N N O O M a of N to M N M v N r O M M N M M N V N to N r N N a N N M V A 'OOD 7 � 0 v h � Y O V 'f V b <� b v •f � O � � �� f O W l7 N m N NW N N ^ W H H � N N N N N N W 1: O M r p n m r r r r r r N N N N N r r N V U> O .3 w s a� W 5 w U E w , p p E U U U U U o w w 0 0=� x2 i 2 2 2 z a a d w� 9 � we E E a Y p O ca EO q U o• U E o c 2 a e CEO c 0 ��� i a a E o q •cc c c Y t a z o �r c i` o o �' c Q w •c c� U U V U w w 14L ('J d= Y Z d to a ai di to H r K ^_ L L a m Q N n Q KENT 1ST No. 415 CT STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - WHO. INVENRY ofIRELOCATABLES - PTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT K S O # of Stand*M SE nP Spew Ed S S � ... Pec special 2005.2006 Program Classroom Rslocatable 10/1/2005 10/12005 MIDDLE ABR Std Capaeky' ELL ELL Prgm Program Program Use SCHOOL Clsrms at 25.29 Cls Capacity Clarma Ca aci Capacity' Use Capacity P223 FTE' Headcount' pa tY = Relocatables Relocatables at 29 es. Enrollmnnr rn...ii-6 den _. _ .. Cedar Heights Middle School CH 35 853 7 52 1 g - Penal r 2005-2006 Mattson Middle School MA 30 729 5 64 Prgm .24 929 Meeker Middle School MK 34 831 3 31 2 48 841 Meridian Middle School MJ 29 708 5 36 1 48 910 Mill Creek Middle School MC 28 683 5 68 1 24 768 Northwood Middle School NW 35 856 4 31 2 24 775 Sequoia Middle School SJ 31 757 4 27 2 48 935 5 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 1-,12) Middle School Grade 7 - 8 Enrollment 48 832 Middle School TOTAL 222 5,417 33 , 309 14 284 5,990 APPENDIX B K S D 126 # of Standard 9!i r tP sowIl Ed S Pec g - Penal r 2005-2006 SENIOR HIGH Kentlake Senior High KL 49 ABR Std Capacity ELL ELL Prgm Program Program rogram 89 17 Clarets at 25-31 Cla Ca adt ClsmtS cen■nMu r -U -1k, Y 0 5 126 901,60 902 0 0 Kent -Meridian Senior High KM S1 1,334 11 136 14 Kentlake Senior High KL 49 1,2811 13 161 16 Kentrldge Senior High KR 69 1,808 8 89 17 Kentwood Senior High KW 68 11782 6 72 14 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 1 -12) Senior High Grade 9 - 12 Enrollment Night Academy & Regional Justice Center 520 26.38 30 57.14 Senior High TOTAL 237 6,205 38_ 458 81 0 5 126 901,60 902 0 0 0 655.86 656 0 0 0 571,34 574 2 6 174 684.00 686 0 0 0 536.00 536 0 0 0 569,00 570 3 0 0 518.24 520 26.38 30 57.14 59 5 11 300 4,493.18 4,503 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1/2005 10/12005 Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 Headcount' elocatables Relocatablas at 28.31 Enrollment Enrollment 333 1,803 2 4 1241,729.29 1,754 370 1,812 0 5 155 1,807.51 1,844 405 2,302 1 4 124 2,187.48 2,230 333 2,187 5 3 90 12,274,72 2,325 188,55 200 26.38 30 1,441 8,, APPENDIX C 8 1 Excludes Rimmi— at." W DISTRICT TOTAL Earl C'. 1,027 25,034 157 1,085. 75 1 705 27 824 71 ' Special P Capacity =:13:4a 25 cnc Program ca ci Includes classrooms requiring specialized use such as Career & Technical Education Programs, Computer Labs, etc, Secondary school capacity Is adjusted for 85% utilization rate and 1.728 Gass size reduction In 7th 8 10th grade English classes. 9th grade moved to HS in 2004, ' Enrollment is reported on FTE 8 Headcount basis, P223 Headcount excludes ECE 8 315 college -only Running Start students, Full headcount = 27,573, Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Total of. Appendices A B & C April 2006 Page 33 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 USE of RELOCATABLES 2005-2006 2006.2007. 2007.2008 Relocatable Use No, of Student No. of Student No. of Student Relocatables Cape Relooatables Capacity Relocatables Capacity Zoos -2009 No. of Student Relocetablea C8DOcItyj 2009-2010 No. of R9IocatsbIeLL�ga_pacjtyj .Student 2010-2011 No, M Relocatables Student Caped 2011-2012 No. of Relocatables Student Capadt) Required for program use 71 71 71 (le. Computer labs, music, etc.) 71 71 71 71 Elementary Classroom Capacity (Q 24 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 Middle School Classroom Capacity ® 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Classroom Capacity (M 31 4 124 8 186 0 0 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Relocatables Required 75 77 71 Classroom Relocatable Capacity Required 124 186 p 72 24 71 0 71 0 71 0 Pian for Allocation of Classroom Relocatable Facilities Included In Finance Plan: Senior High 4 8 1 Junior High / Middle School 0 ° Elementary o 0 Total4 * � 6 —' B 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 ` ' 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Grade Level Reconfiguration - In 2004, tlth grade students moved to high schools creating sufficient permanent capacity at middle schools. Although relocatables are utilized for a wide variety of purposes, new construction has been timed to minimize the requirement for relocatabies, Kent Schgol District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan APPBaDIX r April 2006 •.ge 34 Edulop Single Family Developments Grid Country Gate Q Lake Youngs BA Crofton Hills / Savana / The Reserve / Stonefleld / Wingfield 187 Eastland Meadows Grid Emerald Ridge & Canyon Crossing 137 Fairfield 28a Foxwood 175 Highland Crossing 143 Highpointe les Horizon Crest 71 Kentridge Place / Forest Trails / Sunwood / Forest Glen S. ss Lake at Wlnterwood Grid Mallory Meadows 118.9 North Park area - East & West Grid North Peak 1 & 2 (Jane's Place) BA Parke Meadows & North Parke Meadows Grid Prestige Park 167 Remington Grid Rhododendron Estates RA Southridge IN Strawberry Lane area / Meridian Crest / SwanVista 94 Summer Glen & Strathmore (Summer Glen East) BA Tamarack Ridge 179 IThe Parks BA Trovitsky Park BA Wood Creek BA Woodside Total Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Student Generation Factor Survey Elementary Total S t u d e n t s Student Generation Factor Arca Units Elem MS Sr Total Elem MS I LY 25 37 23 4 10 1.480 0,920 0.160 Sr 0.400 CO 515 334 167 64 103 0.649 0.324 0.124 0.200 SC 13 16 8 5 3 1.231 0.615 0.385 0.231 EH 52 66 46 8 12 1.269 0.885 0,154 0.231 Co 95 148 69 31 48 1.558 0,728 0.326 0.505 CW 136 121 73 17 31 0.890 0.537 0.125 0.228 MS 79 68 37 11 20 01861 0.468 0.139 0.253 CO 107 78 27 17 34 0.729 0.252 0.158 0.318 HE 100 123 65 21 37 1.230 0,650 0.210 0,370 LY 288 226 102 41 83 0.785 0.354 0.142 0.288 GL 111 105 54 18 33 0.946 0.486 0.162 0.297 ME 25 21 13 6 2 0.840 0.520 0.240 0,080 NO 132 150 88 22 40 1.136 0.667 0.167 0.303 SR 87 88 49 9 30 1,01.1 0.563 0-.103 0.345 CW 106 83 50 13 20 0.783 0.472 0.123 0.189 ME 45 42 24 4 14 0.933 0.533 0.089 0.311 SW 263 250 117 50 83 0.951 0.445 0.190 0.316 ML 16 38 28 5 5 2.375 , 1.750 0.313 0.313 HE 115 131 86 21 24 1,139 0.748 0,183 0.209 EH 117 131 67 24 40 1.120 0.573 0.205 0.342 SC 218 268 124 49 95 1.229 0.569 0.225 CW 134 85 46 11 28 0.634 0.343 0.082 0,436 RW 172 0.209 RW i49 fig 36 44 01866 0.401 0.209 0.256 167 108 63 18 27 0.647 0.377 0.108 0.182 CW 154 127 72 23 32 0.825 0,468 0.149 0.208 RW 474 168 98 25 45 0.354 0.207 0.053 0.095 3,746 3,161 1,665 553 943 0.844 0.444 0.148 0.252 APPENDIX E April 2006 Page 35 Edutog N --gulti-Farnily Developments_ BA Adagio Apartments SA Alderbrook Apartments - 402 Novak Lane 156 Brentwood Townhomes 146 Fairwood Pond Apartments SA Park Place Apartments -1406 Maple Lane 102 Rock Crook Landing SA Silver Springs Apartment& 22416 88th Av So 192 Sunrise at Benson Condos Kent -I District Six -Year Capital FaciilUes Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Student Generation Factor Survey Elementary Total bwaent veneration Factor S t u d e n t s Area Units Total Elem MS Co 200 41 20 7 EH 207 79 53 12 SH 81 67 37 9 FVv 194 40 29 7 SH 51 109 76 12 EH / PL 211 85 64 11 PL 251 131 84 15 GR 88 t9 13 2 0,335 1283 571378 4 75 APF DIX E April 2008 Page 36 0 bwaent veneration Factor Sr Total Elem MS Sr 14 0.205 0.100 0.035 0.070 14 0.382 0,256 0.058 0,068 21 0.827 0.457 0.111 0.259 4 0.206 0.149 0.036 0.021 21 2.137 1.490 0.235 0.412 10 0.403 0.303 0.052 0,047 32 0,522 0,335 0.060 0,127 4 0.216 0.148 0.023 0.045 120 0.445 0.293 0.058 0.094 April 2008 Page 36 0 �j a is all FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CApITAL FACILITIES pLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ii SECTION THE CAPITAL FACH_nlF ,S PLAN - Introduction Inventory of Educational Micilities 2 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities 3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES 1[fitroduction 7 Map Elementary Boundaries 8 Map "Me school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-1 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries' 19-23; ' King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 PIAN 27-29 ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHO01S 2007 CAPITAL FACQXr= PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact. Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No 95249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public School's has updated its 2006 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2006. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the (Sty of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City`of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of th-, Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to -the King County Councilfour Urban Growth Area. line. Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made ,within the. Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Acta . This -plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. As the projects from the 1999 bond were finalized, the District presented a 20 -year plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. Phase 1, x-$245 million bond was presented to the voters in February 2006. This received a 54% yes vote, unfortunately not enough to pass. The School Board is studying options for placing the bond proposal on the September or November of 2006 'ballots. H approved, the bond would replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Labe, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Federal Way High School would be replaced and capacity increased by approximately 800 students. Federal Way High School was built in I938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout. The cost to rebuild is $81 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33%. Part of this cost is included in the Capital Facilities Plan impact fee calculation. The non instructional projects included in the 20- year plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. Because of continued construction inflation, estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBIIC SCAOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FA The Proposed bond package includes shared instructional and community facilities. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Federal Way Celebration Park sports Melds and future Community Center. A performance auditorium is planned for a corner of the Federal Way High School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An environmental instruction and retreat center is proposed for property adjoining Sequoyah Nfuddie School. In September 2006,; the District will open a pilot program at lllahee middle school to allow 5i° grade students to attend. This first Program will have fiftySt` grade students receiving instruction on the Mahee Middle School campus. As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2007 and 2010- Sequoyah Middle School opened in September 2005. With the opening of Sequoyah hfuddle School the average enrollment at all middle schools is between 650 and 800 students. Another initiative that impacts capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound F,arly College. Highline Community College is offering this program to 11'h and 12d'grade - students at the Federal Way caws. The program allows promising l l m and 12t° grade students the opportunity to � � their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts colt eW gree in their final two years of high school The District is also considering offering one to four sch gobools with a Kindergarten through grade instructitiorual figuration. These schools could be offered ateaisting sites, with appropriate facility changes. Other options for opening these schools ane new construction or purchase and remodel of existing buildings. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre -Kindergarten students. A new Headstart facility on the Harry Truman Hi gh School campus opened in January 2005' This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Headstart was housed at three of the elementary schools in the Federal Way District. Currently the only decentralized program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Forest Elementary. The District is facing unique challenges with declining enrollment at some levels and anticipated reductions in State funding for education. Elementary populations have declined the past two years and projections show moderate growth at this level. Because of declining enrollment and continuing budget challenges, the concept of closing an elementary school in the near future has resurfaced. A committee will be meeting during the 20061 07 school year to study elementary populations and boundaries. A recommendation from this committee could include consolidating elementary populations in to fewer facilities. Many filters considering educational requirements and fiscal responsibility will be used to develop a recommendation to the Board. iv FEDERAL WAY MMUC SCHOOLS 2097 CAPITAL FAC, Xr= PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL, FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Manageiment Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides infonnation about current. facilities, existing facility needs, . and expected future facility requirements for FedeW Way Public SdFxKAs. A Financial Plan which, shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization Wed Mows this. I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001 CAPITAL. FACILT IES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACH ITMs ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 .Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 ' Enterprise 351015th Avenue SW Federal Way _ 98023 f Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 ! Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 f Mark Twain� 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 f Meredith Hill 5830 S 300tH Street Auburn 98001 i Mirror Lake Nautilus 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 1000 S 289th Streei Federal Way 98003 (- Panther Lake 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Rainier View 344241st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 3015 S 368th Street 3460012th Avenue SW Federal Way Federal :Way 98003 ' 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 �. Star cake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnyc rest 24629 42nd Avenue'S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way_ 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98WI Wo d od 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 2645416th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 l QLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9" Avenue S{ Federal Way 98003 illahee Kilo 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Lakota 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Sacajawea 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 3391419th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360' ST Auburn . 98001 j Totem SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 26630 40m Ave S . Kent 98032 i Decatur Federal Way 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Thome Jefferson 30611 16th Avenue S 4248 S 288th Street Federal Way 98003 { Todd Beamer 3599916th Ave S Auburn Federal Way 98001 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ` ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1" Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 320201st Ave.S Federal Way 98003 2 f T nWERAL WAY PMI -JC SCHOOLS 2W CAPITAL FACJTM PIAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL I ACILIT[ES Develoued Proaerty _ Administrative Building 3140518th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Sheet Federal Way 98003 i Leased Space Community Resotme Center 1813 S Commons Federal way 98003 Available Office Space 30819 le Ave S Federal Way 9WW G UIIdeveloned hrol�ltY Site # Locatimm 1 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acnes 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Aches 60 E of 10111 Avenue SW - SW 3341h & SW 335th Streets -10.04 Acnes 73 N of SW 32& and east of 456 PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17-47 Acres 82 13'Way S and S 342" St — Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 36e St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 30e St and 10 Ave S —.36 Acres 81 S 332' St and 9m Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations ane needed to house students in the District. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACIIXFM PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF F FUNDS Purchase and .Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of favids is.. Portables Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Lakeland, Panther Lake, Swmycrest and Valhalla Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Buiidin Future Bond Sales Federal Way ffigh School Replace Existing Building, Future Bond Sales Increase Capacity The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional. facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functijms. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non4nstructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the 20 -year plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur Ifigh School site. hwreasedcapacity at Federal Way High in Phase 1 and at Decatur High in Phase 2 supplant the meed for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2M CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for new facilities: Six Year P'inum Plan _ .,. �» «,w•�•�+u,. ceras a year end beteno. on 12l31/t13. 2. Thea funds come {rpa various sola of land and are set ulde for estimated axpenditttree. This G year end balance on 1213 1/03, 3. This is the 12131/o! balance of bond heads. 4. These ace State nmtcin n funds received for Todd Seemer High School, Truman Hi This Is a year end balance on 12131/03. fhtsclnool and the sddldons to existhu bullW=. 3. In" is antidpated State Match for projects attached to the $243 milllon bond issue. Sequoyah Middle School is not ell jiblefor tau matcin }ands, d. Thea ars I*of surplus Anticipated bond funds. voters have not yet approved this bond. The bond amount shown refletxs the dollar atqum for instructions! facwtia' has not been re-calcultted with new State Match fotrtnuias) 7. Projected sale of surplw ptopeNa. 8. Thea ars Pmjoftd fan reptaeat the co st t of Don own msidW.W developments in the District over the treat six yeas, This tl8ttte aa,u�e $S0,000 9, These fee eta existinS portables and ni Portables;Wper month for the next Six years. purehasi new FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILIM PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2005/06 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In January 2005 the Board, of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2005/06 school year. The following maps snow the service area boundaries for each school, by schooltype. (Harry S. Truman Ifrgh School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students hone throughout i1he District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in garde configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas: The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent Eo drat development. School Districts are different, If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until' boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities, l Adjusting : boundaries .requires careful consideration by the District" and is not taken lightly. It is recognitied that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. i Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development doer not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth .throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 rr -2-7 ! tuts ra.,k_ v!7 0 .,J& eta 1i. '01 NJ IN altuRiu, hL Ad El RVA W11 Tom - WIN IE Uq NJ RW a�- EVE v At o N FEE it & N 0 FERERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACHMM FLAN SECTION 3 • SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Buikting Capacities -The Education Program Portable Locations Student Fomcast - 2007 through 2.013 Capacity Summaries King County IVact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2llti7 CAPITAL FACT xMS PIAN Building Canities i This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ' ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public InstcuclYon i establishes square footage guidelines for capfity,, but these guidelines do not take into consideration. the education MUM needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. 'Phis Full. Tune Equivalent (FTI?) eapacit•y is i based on: i • The number of classrooms available in each school Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. For 25 students_ frr'siatl and seventh grades 3-5 the target is grade the students scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers -for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 RUIents per may. At eighth grade, the- teachers will see 90 students per day. � gmdes 9-12 the target class size is 26 students. _ _ t In the 2005/06 school year, all of the 23 elementary schools offer at least one all day ' Kindergarten- Tbis program does have capacity impacts,as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. i . F f i 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACET MES PLAN WELDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACIfY School Name Headcount FIE Iml Nautilus 450 430 Olympic View 399 379 Panther Lake 432 41.2 Rainitz rev 445 ag Sherwood Forest 4" 469 Silver Lake 502 482 Star Lake 474 454 5mw-ycwst 424 404 twin Lakes 450 430 vallmlla 477 457 hvildwood' 445 425 AVoodmout 37S 3S9 MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM. CAPACITY vmV SENIOR HIGH BUHDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FIB Decatur 1269 FoderaI way1456 1 1 Jeffason 1435 19 OM Beamer 1331 1 rum_ an Hi School 200 200 WAYPublic Academ 133 133 2006 TOTAL 5,624 6,145 XM TOTAL 10,014- r verag1,373 e 7yerage 435 1 416 ALTERNATIVE SCMOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FIE E20: School 16 16 totes' TOTAL 16 16 Federal Way Pn61ic Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOM 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to Provide each student a basic 500 - students due to I use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for ack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as WMPOEMY facilities or interim measures to house students until Permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the PolUble(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage of child care program, or moved to another school for an interim classroom, Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or Physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose. to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and Philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools facilities. that portables are not acceptable as permanent The following page provides a list of the location -f the -portable facilities, used for temporary educationat facilities by fWeral Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACULTIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED ATM DDLE SCHOOLS 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS MIN Ili, wantucnomAL DocaWr I 9 Jefferson 7 odd Bcamer 8 AI. 27 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT'FACRXIMS 1 3 AL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SrM Sherwood Forea i Total FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SM00j S 2007 CAPITAL FACHIMS PLAN 1 i 1 Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are abasic component of budget development. Enrollment projections inflwnce many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Depart., Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students_ ' The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of i a group that has a common statistical value {grade level) as it progresses through time, In a �. stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical ! information to develop averages and_project the averages forward. This method does not i trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each. grade level_ The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study. several projections. Because transfersin and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. j. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Masterlm software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure de to grade growth, t 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The Iong--range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the used for long age enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (eg. population) or that enrollment will mirror some groJected trend for the school age population overtime. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. The District will contract with an independent. demographer to update -these projections after the October 12006 enrollment counts. Long-range.projections that establish the need for facilities are a dation of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The A:deral Way Schoof District long-range projections ane studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as .they projed future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the Projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth fiiom new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning.assurnes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan fora minimum of twenty years. ne Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections erste a vision of the school district community in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount =.:5 FTE; Middle School FT11=99 Headowmt; Senior High FTE _ .945Hadoount) Caleedar Yr Total K -12 IPn School Year Ekmea Middle Sdwol SeaiK FTE [-T. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 22,00^ 21,00 -20,01X AL 19.00( U 18`000 17,000 16,000 15,000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 s 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 B100W P2007 -M P208-" P2001-10 P201041 P2011-12 P2012-13 * New Gnfit+ a 11,640 5,305 4,338 11,498 5,337 4,467 11,202 5,454 4,437 9,127 5,524 6408 9,164 5,473 6,515 9,105 513" 6,770 AM 5;002 7,005 9,134 41959 7,057 9129f 41915 61M 9,396 4,94! 6,925 9,602 5,038 6,742 9,Mf 5,121 6,672 9,614 5,222 6,714 Ek--I-y %5 A rdAr Schog 6-3 HI -9k Sdioei 9-12 Enrollment History and Six year Foraraet 21A3 21,302. RI% 21,093 -1.0% 21,059 -R2% 21,152 0.4% 21,184 &2% 21,024 -Rl% 21,150 &6x 21,192 E2% 21,260- 9t3x 21,282 &1% 21,382 &5% 21,550 � bd' School Year 18 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 02% 0.0% w -D-2% c 0.4% A' 0.6% D.8% 1.0% 12% ® -♦-Percent of Cbarx�e t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2907 CAPITAL FACHMIE,S PLAN Capacity summaries . All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior lEgh Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior.high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. F F 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACT TTES PLAN i CAPACYfY SUA'U11ARY - ALL GRADES j Budget - - Projected - - CAPACITY Year 2007 Year School Year 2406/07 2008 2009 20076/08 2008109 20I0 2011 2009/10 2010/11 2012 2011/12 2012 2012/13 ING PROGRAM BEA[HAdidor 21;301 21,275 21,249 21,223: 21,197 .21,197 .21,997 subtract changes to capacity SpecEduca " ral tion CbanBes Increase Capacity at Federal way High • .. = ... _ ...: = :.:.. - .. , .PamiesIcopuoE Capacity 21,275 21,49 21;223 21197, 21;197 21? 21,997 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE'Emollinent 21,024 121,150 1 21,192 21Internet,260 21,282 21,382 21,550 ` ''{ 288 288 `` 288.. 788 i!88 288 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Cunt Portable Capacity 2,575 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 Add/Subtract Portal& Capacity Add New Port" Capacity - Deduct Poctat�& SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM. AND RELOCATABLE 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY- ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY Budget - Projected - - Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Esalow 1 2012 2012 Y Year 2006/07 2M0O7 200&" 2009110 2010/11 6.]/011 2011/12 2012/13 BUILDING PROGRAM HFAD COUNT CAPACITY I 10,014 9,998 9" 9,9M 9 , ,910 9,910 9,910 1. Special FAJUM6013 Changes .......... ..... . ------- - AAfju*ui PuWaiii8cadcount capacity 9.988 9.962 9,936 —9.910. 9,910 9.910.. 9,910 ENROLLMENT Basic FrE Fmwoniziciat 2!_ Internet ( A AFM 8,937 32 9,13489 32 1 "9 32 9,396 32 9,502 32 9,589 .32 9,614 32 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. CurreW Podable 'C"city 1,350 1,300 1,300 1,300. 1,3W ......... ... . AddSubuact portable capacity .... ... ... - -------- 1- Add Special Education and ECEAP Programs This reduce:; Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. .2. Internet Academy students we included in projections but do not r fill t= use of school require choo facilites 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to to house students until Peini'meut facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number ofporbbks that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pun portables fioni the instructional -inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine fen %i for continued instructional use. 1,300 1,300 ... ......... ........ ... ........ ....... 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Z Budget -- projected - - Calendar Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 -2012 CAPACITY School Year 200"7 20076(08.20081'09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 BUILDING PROGRAM - HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 1 5,463 1 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 .5,518 I-------- A ENRO)LLMEN'P Basic FTE EaroHmcW 5,082 4,959 4,915 4,949 5,038 5,121 1. Intemet Academzy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 _ 92 92 92 ti i RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 - Current: portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750- 750 AddSubhact Portable capacity i Add new portable capacity.......... = . _ St3RPI.US-0R (UN9OUSLD) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time we of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on fife number of portables available and other adnui nistrative techniques whicli can be used to temporaruly house students until permanent facilities are avaflable. This is a calculated member only. The actual mmnba ofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of be. portables will determine feasilulity for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and m pluming time in some classrooms. 5,222 92 22 750 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR MGH SCHOOLS Budget Projected - Year 2007 2009 2009 2010 1--2011 20 20121 I CAPACITY School Year 2006/07 20076/08 2008109 2009/10 12010/11 2011/12 2012/1 BUILDING PROGRAM 'JAIRADCOUM CAPACffY 5.924 .,5.824. 5,924 5,924 5,824 5)M, 6.624 Add or subtract changes in capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way High School ... .......... 7,095 1 7,057 6,988 I6,925- 1, 6,f4-". - 111672 1 6,714 164]_ 164_ 1 164 `.164 . 164 1 164 164 3.Add wwpo#"cap"- 675 675I 675 675 675 ........... ------- NOTES: L Intem3et Academy students are included in pF0j0Cti0Kks but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2- Relocatable Capacity is based on the nno a , ofportaws avaijabje and other administrative techniques which can be used to lemporwily home students until permanent facilitm we avadabk This is a calculated number only The actual nwribW ofpoiubks that will be used wig be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull porb"a from the instructional inventory- Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for coutimW instrnetionaj use. 3. Add Portahk Capacity 4- Capacity for uDboused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unbotised students - 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOI.S 20¢7 CAPITA% FAaLF17ES PLAN King County, the City ofF®de 21 Wav and the City o Kgt Impact gee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences - Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula require the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or mW&family unit and to gather some standard constriction costs, which are unique to that districK. - STUDENT GMERATIf N FACMR ANALYSES Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using .actual generation factors from single-family units that last five (5) years. were constructed in the - DdPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the ' calculations for the student generation- factor is a copy,. of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Acta ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is at negotiated purchase price_ Plan Year 2007 I I I Flan Year 2006 Single Family Units - $3,418. $3,393. Multi -Family Units $856. $ 895. 24 i Multi Family Student Genomtion ber of Number of Number ofNumber of Number of emEN:u Fsmlry Multi-Femliy Eletnwa iNlI aS Dw.nh,ee e...�_� ry Middle 1Rohool Senior High Student Student I Student Student FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCIIOOLS 2007 CAPTIAL FACILITIES FLAN IWACT FEE Schod Site Acquisition Cost: Cost Student Student SFR MFR Facility Cost/ Facility Factor 01121 Stl s0 96.0896 Acte SFR Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ MFR Elementary 0.00 $0 417 03291 0.1121 _ $0 $0 [Middle School 21.811 587.747 921 0.1843 TOTAL $383 $8g Sr High 120 $173,833 133 0.2268 ]IEG.0423 698$356 Fee ;109 3,018 $ 856 $739 $197 School Cous&vctiou Cost: Student Student % Perch Fact Facility Facility Fahr Factor Vy r...i Elementary Middle School Sr High Total Sq Ft Cost SFR Um SFR MFR 9609% SO 417 0-32911 01121 Stl s0 96.0896 .518,352,956 921 0.1843 0.04?3 $3.529 $810 0896 528.968,637 933 0.2268 0.0698 $6,766 52.082 (2,228) $ (525) Sub -Total TOTAL ;12 1,712 Temporary Facility Cost: Single Family Multi -Family Rtsidenhces % Temp Fac. Facility Facility ToS Ft W Cost Size Iry v 3.9296 $o Middle School 3.92'X, 197 Sr Wch 3.92 5128,106 10,294 S State Matching Credit Cakdatwu: Tenwormy Facility cost Boeck Cost! S Ft $154-22 Sq. FL State Student Match Middle School $15422 New Sr High 5154.22 ,-- 000. 117 .0.00! t �r oru T= P"Ment Credit Caks"Um Average Assessed Value (April 2006) Capital Bond lntctest Rate (April 2006) Net Present Value of Average Dwclhgg Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Student Student Factor Factor SFR MFR 03291.01: 0.1843__ - OA, Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR f _.#I r SFR MFR ?15.644$57,873 439% , 4.39% ,954.267 $460,420 10 10 $1,14 $1:14 26 Single Family Multi -Family Rtsidenhces Mitigation Fee Summary Residences Site.Acquisitiou Cost S 739 $ 197 Permanent Facility Cost $ 10,294 S 2,892 Tenwormy Facility cost $ 46 $ 14 State Match Credit $ (2,815) $ (866) Tax Payment Credit $ (2,228) $ (525) Sub -Total $ 6AM $ 1,712 50% Local Shane $ 3,018 $ 856 Fee S 3,018 $ 856 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACIIXrM PLAN I SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - f The 207 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2006 Plan and the 2007 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACums =PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been, rolled forward to reflect 2007/2013 i SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUhffWATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program.changes for the 2006W school year. Fdementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Building Program Capacities are found onpage 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables ptuchased. Portable Locations.can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The_ Strident Forecast now covers 2007through 2013. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes .in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity_ Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - EING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 27 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACUIM PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GIIVI?RATTON FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan "and the 2007Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The StudentGeneration worksheet is found on page 25. SIM ACOUISMON COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage for Sequoyah I4 fiddle School. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre baseline cost and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3 -acne site. The grade span ! for this facility is gravies 6-10 Nddle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is [ 40%. Sequoyah: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312 900 (60 % of $521,500 L8 acws of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,M/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA S 208 600 (4096 of $521500 1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) ! CostlAcreage $ 208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWPA - $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cast $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students. The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal Way High Total Cost 5288,637 2$ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.2007 CAPITAL FACUZM FLAN IIMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2006 TO 2007 IMPACT FEE Item FromlTo Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.60 to 96.08% Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities Average Cost of Portable Classroom Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft State Match Average Assessed Value Capital Bond Interest Rate Property Tax Levy Rate Single Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School Multi -Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School 3.40 to 3.92% $82,I51 to $128,106 $129.81 to $154.22 59.97 % (No Change) SFR — $224,943 to $245,644 um— $53,3M to::$57j873 4.57% to 4.39% $1.04 to $1.14 .3138 to.3030 .1632 to .2013 .1695 to .2013 .119 to .0929 .042 to .0410 .053 to .0628 29 Updated portable inventory Updated average of portables purchased and placed in 2005 Change per OSPI Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (FSD 121) Market Rate King County Treasury Division Updated housing Inventory Updated Housing Inventory Dieringer School District Capital, Facilities Plan .2005-201 Board A ro ved A p.� ugust 29, 2D05 DIERINGER SCIIOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320-178x` Avenue Eag _ - Sumner, Washiugton 98390 (253) 862-2531 BOARD OFDIRECTOJU Tim Barfoot Pete George Corey Pawlak Larry Thompson M U7 Kay Wasserstrom Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent Dierin ger Educating every child for Confidence today and Con- tribution tomorrow DierInger School District No. 343 Dieringer School District An Overview Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps school District in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Ta pp o01 Heights ffiementary School and North T Tapps-JM ��en�' School,-Dieringer ' ode education, and serve as hubs for community ddle School, provide K through 8th District #343 is located in unincorporated�' activities as well. Dieringer School ' Fierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn and o the south b the cities of Bonne n Y Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the norther two-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers apprOaimately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment's through eight. Students l approximately 1,220 students in grades kindergarten . Blemen first through third are housed at bake Tapps tary, constructed in 2005 as a.replacement project. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to in kin Qdginally constructed in 1992 and Wi n, fourth and fifth grade. houses students in on to in 1998, North Tapps 1Vliddle School -ghth. The district suppoits an additional 531 high school students who may select to attend any public high school. The ma'ori chose attend Auburn Riverside and -Sumner agh School. J : ty se to The district has a long standing hist6ry of students. our goal is for ours providing high quality education for all our successful, confident, contribuhinmembers t skills that will allow them to become students who come to school well' ��geris composed.of Prepared and eager to learn. Parents are concerned with student success and provide outstanding supPrt for their children and the Dierm— er . School District. The PTA and g many volunteers contribute countless hours and resources to our schools andstudents. The community supports funding issues to support bus acquisition, student the. schools through the passage of construction of school facilities access to current technology and the Capital Facilities Plan Update: 2005 ATTACHMENT #2 For the purposes of the 2005 amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the pierce County - - Comprehensive plana below: we would lice each school district to use the format as outlined in the tables Table IX PS 1 intertn ete-this table as in pierce County's 2004. Capital Facilities PI listing e edrateJmiddle!'unior hi $ ach elementary, each J high, and each high school (see attachment. #1). ffI Name Dieringer School District Lake Tapps Elementary Dieringer Heights Elementary North Tapes Middle School high School TOTAL Table 1X--PS-1. Current Facilities Inventory Public Schools Of current Public School capitai facilities includes the folio no' Capacity (Number of Students) Location 396 1320-178 Ave. E., Sumner 431 21727-340` St. E., Sumner 405 20029-12P St. E., Sumner 0 1232 Diean er School District 2006 Capital Facilities vi . - — waa 1 1[111 Table Ix P S.2. You do not need to provide any information regarding this table from attachment #1. Construction. 2004-05 x O • n Enrollment Projections The Dieringer School District is located in an area that continues to experience growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data, Proposed housing development, the increase in the assessed valuation of the real property and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District experienced a period of slow, steady growth in student enrollment with a ten year average of 1.74%. between October 1994 and 2003. This mirrored the Pierce County 2.03% and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD)1.79% enrollment growth over the same period. Beginning with November 2003, the District saw a notable increase in student enrollment resulting in a 4.5% increase from September 2003 to September 2004. Currently, Dieringer is the most rapidly growing district in Pierce County (+4.33% October to October / 1.95% ten year average) and substantially exceeds the - Pierce County (-0.62% October to October) and the PSESD (+.016% October to October). A review of proposed construction within the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and . beyond. There are 842 single family residents slated for -construction within. the nett four Y ears. The two multi -family projects, transferred from Pierce C Auburn, will contribute an additional 485 -residential units during 20ounty y to totthee City of These projects are anticipated to generate an additional 460 students in kindergarten through eighth grade,ln .addition, 161 students will be added to enrollment from normal growth from individual houses and in -migration by September, 2011. Information from Pierce County Planning & band Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 more lots in the western portion of the district that are not included in the above numbers. To address this growth the District is currently developing plans to construct an additional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary and an auxiliary -gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science Moms at North Tapps Middle School by fall of 2006. Future anticipated growth will create. the need to acquire an additional school site and construct an additional school to house the growing student enrollment. Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase Proposed Housing Units for Approved Developments: _ Single Family- 842 x ,48 generation factor = 404. students K-8 grade._ ._ . Multi -family — 485 x .1149 generation factor = 56 students K-8 grade (Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Generation Factor) Proposed Housing Units from Individual Lots and In -migration: 161 students K-8 grade Enrollment Impact: 621 students K-8 Estimated 103 students a year over the period 200&2011 Potential enrollment increase = 51.84% (based on 1,198 enrollment 5-05) Increase per grade level = 69 students Approximately 207 students per school HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS August 2005 #1 Fairweather Cove Estates (25) - Notice of application 1/24/01 - 25 Single Family Lots -1600-2000 block of 10 St. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy. - Develop phase started 3105 - Contact -- Carl Halsan (253) 307-1922 = 25 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding = - #2 Rainier Plateau (10) - - Notice of application 10/13/00 =10 Single Family Lots -End of 34'h St. - Plat Approval resubmitted to Pierce County - Possibly 2005 (waiting for county road permit) - Contact — Waiter. Bishop (253) 537-3705 -10 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 43 Quiet Water (86) -Notice of Application 12!30194. Re-application 3/19/99 -156 Single Family Lots sold - Along 214` East of Tapps Island - 90 homes under construction 5/05 (7o. Occupied 9-05) - Contact Pacific Resource Development (253) 848-5541 -86 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #4 Grandview Ridge H and III (12) - Off Sumner-Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deet. Island Dr. - Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13199 - 50 Single. Family Lots, 38 completed 5105 - Substantial completion by fall 2005 -II; III (9 lots) start fall 2005) - Contact Mr. Westmark (253) 6064685 -12 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #5 North Tapps Estates (193) -north of Lake Tapps Elementary -Preliminary Plat 7/23/02 -193 Single Family Lots = Development phase started 3105 -Contact Matthew Sweeney (253) 565-1728 -193 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #6 White River View Tracks (0) Edwards Road (overlooking the White River Valley) -27 Single Family Lots - Completed 5105 - Contact Summit Reality, Lenny (253) 405-5292 - Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #7 Forest Canyon Highlands (251) -Notice of application 8/271 -251 single family Lots -South of road terminus from Lakeland Hills Hwy. -Contact Terry Barghausen (425) 251-6222 -Construction 2006-2008; full completion winter 2008 -251 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #8 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (11) . - = Notice of application 9/13/04 -11 large lots -across from Snag Island -Contact John 9W (253) 798-3185 -11 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding - F #9 Terrace View Park (430) Environmental Impact Statement with Addendum 9/28/99 -430 Multi -Family Units (apartments: 1, 2 and 3 bedroom -offFrast Valley Hwy., at base -of new Lake T ) - Contact Jeff. Dixon, Auburn Planning Dept., �� 931 3000 #10 Country Creek Estates (9) -9 Single Family Lots -off 15' near Edwards Road -Construction 2/05 with fust homes fall 2005 -Contact Robert Stewart, Developer, (253) 833-0857 9 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding (see file notes) #11 Forest Canyon Estates (124) -124 Single Family Lots -off Forest Canyon Rd -Site Development spring 2006 with site completion by. 2008 -Contact Lary Onorati, Agent (425) 251-6222 -124 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #12 Forest Canyon Heights (21) 21 Single Family Lots --off Forest Canyon Rd. -Construction April 2005 with first home by January 2006 -Contact Rick Gienger (253) 531-04.12 office; (253) 380-0996 cell -21 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 742 Single Family Units to be built _ 430 Multi -family Units to be built' #13 Auburn Annexation (155) -100 Single Family Lots -55 townhouses 8/05 Standard of Service The Dieringer School District houses children in elementary" schools serving students kindergarten through f fth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. IJigh school students, an nine through twelve, attend adjacent high schools primarily in the Auburn School District. , Dieringer School District follows a -traditional school calendar be September and complearly eting in mid June. 'The day school schedul�gin between 7:49:. . ,and 8:45 a.m, and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Dieritiger School District standard of service is. based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieninger School District Board of Directors. Due passto the age of Initiative 728 and in keeping with the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom fourth through fifth grade 25 and sixth throw eighthkindergarten through thud grade is 22, - an impact � �e 27. These class sizes have on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes.: . In the District, rooms designated ,and assigned for special classrooms. At the elementary level students are use are not counted as capacity education and art inshnction in provided music instruction, physical separate, non -capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non -capacity spaces. S Programs are provided as pullout Special education and remedial p programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six as providing S/6 capacity to accommodate teach day; classrooms are calculated space. Planning time in the instructional Table -IX -PS -2k Complete this table by indicating the level of service in square feet per student, which has been established at each level (elementary, intermediate/middlejunior high, high school) for your school district. Table IX PS.2A. School District Service Standards Public School Facilities care Feet Student) Elementary Middle Junior High . :Senior High 'strict Name . Schools Schools. Schools Scht�ols ieringei 120 189 NA NA ATTACffivII M IX -PS -2-1 Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2004 Capital Facilities Plan. List proposed individual capacity projects for 2006 -2011. Table 1X -PS -3 Please provide the information for one time period, 2006-2011. Table IX -PS -3. CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds (x $1,000) Public School Facilities SourcesfUses I 2006-2011 urces of Funds isting Revenue: Bond Proceeds, Reserve N Revenue: 0 Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, MlItigation Payments 528,323 Total Sources $28,323 fses of Funds geringer Heights Elementary 5 classroom addition ($2,196) lementary School No. 3 Orth Tapps_Middle School ($17,440) science lab, auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom addition ($6,525) m -Capacity Projects: transportation additions and technology upgrades ($2,162) Subtotal ($28,323) lance Total Costs ($28,323) plus or (Deficit) 0 0 Non -Capacity Projects Transportation Center Additions 1,172,000 Technology Improvements 990,000 Total Non -Capacity Projects I _ 2,162,000 TOTAL PROJECTS 28,323,000 1,172, 000 0 990,000 .0 2,162,000 0 27,536,000 0 Secured Source of Funds Bond & State Impact Interest Match Fees '787,000 0 0 787,000 0 0 0 0 FINANCE PLAN ' 0 0 August, 2005 Permanent Capacity.Projects Unsecured Source of Funds Estimated Estimated Estimated Cost Bond Amt, State Match Dieringer Heights Elem. Additions 2,196,000 2,196,000 0 Elementary School No..3 17,440,000 17,440,000 0 N T Middle School Additions 6,525,000. 5,738,000 0 Total Capacity Projects 26,161,000 _ 25,374,000._' 0 Non -Capacity Projects Transportation Center Additions 1,172,000 Technology Improvements 990,000 Total Non -Capacity Projects I _ 2,162,000 TOTAL PROJECTS 28,323,000 1,172, 000 0 990,000 .0 2,162,000 0 27,536,000 0 Secured Source of Funds Bond & State Impact Interest Match Fees '787,000 0 0 787,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 01 0 787,000 - . Table IX -PS -5. The "total Cost" in the following table shows the total cost of capacity projects needed to meet the level of service standards for school facilities. To calculate "Total Cost," you can use the following formula: Total Cost Net Deficiency (from "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column) x School District Cost per Student (from Table IX -PS -5A.) Because "School District Cost Per Student" (from Table IX -PS -5A.) differs among the elementary, inteffiediate/middleTunior high, and high schools, separate calculations need to be made for each, and. then added together to obtain the "Total Cost" figure. If the "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column shows a new reserve, the "Total Cost" column will be zero. Table IX -PS -5. Capital Facility Requirements, to 2011 Public School Facilities (See Table IX -PS -5A for individual rates at each level.) Time Period Student Student Net Reserve Total Cost Population/ Capaciy or (Cost/Student Student Demand (Deficiency) x Net Deficiency) 2005 Actual 1,219 1,232 13 2006-2011 Growth 621 678 57 Non -Capacity Costs Total Cost as of 2011 PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS MASTER SCHEDULE August, 2005 Name Current 6 - Year C aci Total a acf 2006 Lake Tapps Elementary2007 2006 2010 2011 (LTES Replacement) 396. 396 Dieringer Heights Elem. DHES Classroom Addit. 431 431 116 116 X Elementary School No. 3 400 400 North Taps MS X NTMS Additions 405 405 (Science Rms) (Auxilliary Gym) 1 4 54 10.8 x 54 X TOTALS - 1232 678 1910' Table IX -PS -5A. Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2004 Capital Facilities Plan. If possible, use 2004 dollars. If you are using dollars from a different year, indicate the year. Table 1X -PS -5A. School District Cost Per Student Public School Facilities District Name (2004 Dollars) Elementary 11 Me Junior Ifigh SenioraI$ Schools Schools Schools . Schools Dieringer $22,745 $32,238 NA NA ff Im act 1=ee Calculation te Acquisition Cost; Construction cost: IY Cost/Facility Q ifia Uo.SEHita SCh. Cost CreCreditdii X SPI a 9e assessed Value al Bond interest Rai 'esent Value of Ave Amortized riy Tax Leal Rate U Generation Factor Y 7' Faml $965.00 tarn S206.00 Permanent Facility Cost $26,507.42 _ Temporarylemporary Facility Cost $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit $000 $000 fax Payment Credit ($6,561.34) ($4,897.15) EE $20,911 $1,479 EE W1TH DISCOUNT OF 50% $10,456 EE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% �., ,,11 1 J 11•• 1 •� _ G rresenT value of Revenue Stream $6,561 $4,897 Fee Sumary: Sin a Mulff e _ - Site Acquistion costs. Faml $965.00 tarn S206.00 Permanent Facility Cost $26,507.42 $6,169.80 Temporarylemporary Facility Cost $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit $000 $000 fax Payment Credit ($6,561.34) ($4,897.15) EE $20,911 $1,479 EE W1TH DISCOUNT OF 50% $10,456 EE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% t„�