HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM VIII-B-3
A TYOf
UBURN AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
WASHINGTON
Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4367 Date: June 30, 2008
Department: Planning, Building Attachments: Resolution No. 4367; Budget Impact:
and Community excerpt from report $ None
Administrative Recommendation: City Council introduce and adopt Resolution No. 4367
Background Summary:
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties, in consultation with their cities and towns, to
establish a review and evaluation program (Buildable Lands) to determine if there is sufficient land and
planned densities within designated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to meet the expected population and
employment growth anticipated to occur within the twenty-year planning period. Reports are due every 5
years, with the first report being prepared in 2002 and the second in 2007.
The Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board has concluded that these reports that are
formally adopted by legislative bodies are subject to a sixty-day period in which appeals to the Board may
be made. Once that time period has elapsed, an appeal on this basis may not be made.
Auburn Planning staff participated in the preparation of the 2007 King County Report for that portion of
the city that lies within King County. The analysis concluded that the city has sufficient land to meet both
anticipated household and employment growth.
The Planning and Community Development Committee recommended approval of Resolution No. 4367.
L0707-9
A1.3
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
? Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ? Building ? M&O
? Airport ? Finance ? Cemetery ? Mayor
? Hearing Examiner ® Municipal Serv. ? Finance ? Parks
? Human Services ® Planning & CD ? Fire ® Planning
? Park Board ? Public Works ® Legal ? Police
? Planning Comm. ? Other ? Public Works ? Human Resources
Action:
Committee Approval:
Council Approval:
Referred to
Tabled
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Baker
Meetina Date: Julv 7, 2008 Item Number: VIII.B.3
?Yes ?No
?Yes ?No Call for Public Hearing
Until _
Until
AUBURN * IM 0P E THAN YOU IMAGINED
RESOLUTION NO. 4 3 6 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, ACKNOWLEDGING AND ACCEPTING
THE 2007 KING COUNTY BUILDABLE LANDS REPORT
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became
effective (Chapter 36.70A Revised Code of Washington); and
WHEREAS, the GMA requires King County, in consultation with its cities and
towns, to designate an urban growth area which includes areas and densities sufficient
to permit urban growth that is projected to occur within the twenty-year planning period;
and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.215 was amended in 1997 to require King County, in
consultation with its cities and towns, to establish a review and evaluation program
(Buildable Lands) that results in the submittal of a report (the Buildable Lands Report) to
the State every five years, with the first report due on September 1, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (the
Board) is one of the three administrative appeal boards created by the GMA (RCW
36.70A.250), and the Board has concluded that the buildable lands reports developed to
meet the legislative requirements of RCW 36.70A.215 that are formally adopted by
legislative bodies are subject to a sixty day period in which appeals to the Board may be
made (Seattle-King. County Association of Realtors v. King County (CPSGMHB Case
No. 04-3-0028); and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development (CTED) distributed a letter on June 20, 2007, that further
Resolution No. 4367
June 12, 2008
Page 1 of 4
advocates following the Board's recommendation to formally acknowledge completion
of the Buildable Lands Report; and
WHEREAS, the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) are written
policy statements used for establishing a countywide framework from which county and
city comprehensive plans are developed; and
WHEREAS, the Buildable Lands legislation required King County, in consultation
with its cities and towns, to adopt countywide planning policies to establish a review and
evaluation program and where King County CPP FW-1 Step 5 (b) establishes the
review and evaluation program; and
WHEREAS, the GMPC recommended the King County Council adopt the 2007
King County Buildable Lands Report; and
WHEREAS, King County Council adopted Ordinance 16056, adopting the 2007
King County Buildable Lands Report; and
WHEREAS, the underlying purpose of the review and evaluation report is to
determine if there is sufficient suitable land to accommodate the countywide urban
population allocation within the adopted urban growth areas; and
WHEREAS, new residential platting data and new multi-family building permit
information representing development between 2001 and the end of 2005 was collected
and reviewed; and
WHEREAS, the assumptions incorporated in the residential and employment
evaluation and capacity associated with development were developed in consultation
with the City of Auburn representative and agreed upon by appropriate jurisdictions;
and
Resolution No. 4367
June 12, 2008
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, King County Council adopted the GMA population allocations and
growth targets for unincorporated King County and each city and town throughout King
County; and
WHEREAS, the total 2022 King County urban area household target totals
151,932 and the 2022 King County household target for the City of Auburn totals 6,003;
and
WHEREAS, the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report identifies a surplus of
784 housing units to accommodate the 2022 urban growth target within the City of
Auburn; and
WHEREAS, the total 2022 King County urban employment target totals 289,122
jobs and the 2022 King County urban employment target for the City of Auburn totals
6,079 jobs; and
WHEREAS, the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report identifies the need
for 6,079 additional jobs for the City of Auburn to accommodate the City of Auburn 2022
urban employment target; and
WHEREAS, the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report estimates the urban
growth area(s) has a household capacity of 277,249 and the City of Auburn has a
household capacity of 6,317; and
WHEREAS, the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report estimates the urban
growth area(s) has an employment capacity of 527,720 jobs and the City of Auburn has
an employment capacity of 17,757 jobs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has completed a review and evaluation consistent
with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215; and
Resolution No. 4367
June 12, 2008
Page 3 of 4
WHEREAS, the findings of the review and evaluation for the City of Auburn have
been published in the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report, and
WHEREAS, the findings of the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report
indicate that the City of Auburn has sufficient capacity, based on actual densities
achieved during the most recent 5-year review period, to accommodate household and
job growth targeted for the remainder of the current 20-year planning period;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report dated September
2007 is hereby acknowledged and accepted by the City of Auburn to meet the
legislative review and evaluation requirements under RCW 36.70A.215.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day of 12008.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
A OV ZOF a iel B . H e
Resolution No. 4367
June 12, 2008
Page 4 of 4
I. Executive Summary
Overview of the Buildable Lands Requirement
In 1997, the Washington State legislature adopted the Buildable Lands amendment to the Growth
Management Act (GMA), RCW 36.70A.215. The amendment requires six Washington counties
including King County, together with their cities, to prepare a review and evaluation report every five
years. The 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report contains data on 5 years of development
activity (2001-2005) along with an updated analysis of land supply and capacity (2006) to
accommodate Household and Job Growth Targets. Findings are reported for the Urban Growth Area
(UGA) as a whole, each of 4 urban subareas, and each city. Based on the results of the Buildable
Lands evaluation, "reasonable measures" may be required at the countywide or city level to ensure
sufficient capacity for planned growth.
The GMA requires designation of Urban Growth Areas to "include areas and densities sufficient to
permit urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period" (see
RCW.36.70A.110). The Buildable Lands evaluation represents a mid-course check that this
important GMA requirement is being met in King County. The focus of the evaluation therefore is on
the designated Urban areas of King County and growth targets for those areas as established in the
Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs).
This 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report (BLR) is the second five-year evaluation prepared by
the county and its cities in response to the Buildable Lands amendment. The first evaluation report
was submitted to the State in September 2002. While the 2007 BLR complements and extends the
information in the earlier report, it stands alone as its own evaluation.
For more detail on the Buildable Lands requirement, see Chapter II.
Countywide Collaboration
Buildable Lands implementation within King County is a collaborative effort of all 40 jurisdictions. It
consists primarily of coordination among relatively independent local efforts, achieved through:
• Technical assistance and project coordination provided by Suburban Cities Association (SCA)
staff in partnership with King County
• Technical guidelines for local data collection and analysis
• Use of standardized worksheets and templates to collect and analyze data
• Technical staff forums to coordinate Buildable Lands data collection among jurisdictions
• Collaboration of staff from King County, SCA, and the cities of Seattle and Bellevue on
countywide methodologies, overall review and evaluation framework, and contents of the report
• Oversight and guidance from the Growth Management Planning Council, a formal body of
elected officials representing King County and its cities
Such coordination ensured that the 2007 Buildable Lands analysis was carried out in a broadly
consistent and comparable manner throughout King County, while allowing for limited local
variations to account for differing land use and market characteristics, data resources, and local land
use policies.
2007 King County Buildable Lands Report
I _ 1
Methodology
The 2007 Buildable Lands Report incorporates the results of several technical elements, including
the following:
• Analysis of subdivision plat and building permit data for the years 2001-2005
• Analysis of parcel and critical areas data using geographic information systems (GIS) to estimate
the acres of vacant and redevelopable land within zoning designations as of early 2006
• Conversion of the land supply data to units of capacity (housing units, jobs), based on analysis
assumptions for land dedications, market availability, densities, and other factors
• Evaluation of the sufficiency of the capacity for housing and jobs to accommodate growth needs
for the remainder of the planning period (2006-2022).
Figure 1.1, below, illustrates the relationship among these technical elements within the entire data
collection, analysis, and evaluation process. For more detailed documentation of the methodology
used in preparing this report, see Chapter III and technical appendices.
Figure 1.1: Elements of Buildable Lands Analysis and Evaluation
Land Supply Inventory
January 2006
Vacant and redevelopable parcels
Critical areas
ROWs and public facilities
Market factor
Net acres/sq. ft. of land
Development Capacity Analysis
January 2006
Housing units
Jobs
Annual Development Activity
2001-2005
Net densities achieved-
DUs per acre
Floor Area Ratios
Growth Targets Remaining
2006-2022
CPP targets for households and jobs
(2001-2022)
Net residential and job growth
(2000-2005/6)
Evaluation
Is capacity sufficient to accommodate
targets for households and jobs for the
remainder of the planning period?
Overall, the technical framework for the 2007 Buildable Lands Report is consistent with that used in
the 2002 report. Limited revisions and updates were made to analysis assumptions, including
densities, public land needs, critical areas, market factors, and other factors. Changes to the
methodology were informed by a review of the 2002 BLR methodology, analysis of emerging data
trends, discussions with local staff, and meetings with stakeholder groups to seek input on
methodology and the scope of the evaluation.
1 - 2 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report
Major Findings of the 2007 Buildable Lands Report
Analysis of data on growth and development activity for the 5-year review period (2001-2005)
produced the following major findings:
• Housing growth on track with targets. King County jurisdictions added over 49,000 net new
housing units within the UGA. Approximately half of the new housing was single family, half
multifamily. Overall housing growth-within each subarea and within the UGA as a whole-is
slightly ahead of pace to reach 2001-2022 Household Growth Targets within the planning period.
• Trend toward higher residential densities. Single-family and multifamily residential densities
permitted from 2001-2005 were higher than densities observed in development during the
previous 5-year review period. UGA-wide, single-family development achieved 6.2 units per net
acre in plats. Multifamily permits achieved 38 units per net acre. Net densities were calculated
based on actual measurement of critical areas, rights-of-way and public uses in residential
developments.
• Mixed indicators of non-residential growth. Data for the county as a whole show a net loss of
approximately 25,000 jobs between 2000 and 2006, due to the recession of 2001-2004.
Permitting of new commercial and industrial development, however, continued to occur
throughout Urban King County, with permits issued for about 18 million sq. ft. of space in
commercial zones and 10 million sq. ft. of space in industrial zones UGA-wide.
Analysis of data on land supply and development capacity, estimated as of early 2006, produced the
following major findings:
• Residential land capacity. The UGA contains approximately 22,000 net acres of land suitable
for residential development to accommodate growth during the planning period. Based on
current plans and regulations, achieved densities, and other factors, the UGA has capacity for
about 84,000 single-family homes and about 205,000 multifamily units. Half of the UGA's
residential capacity is in mixed-use zones.
• Sufficient capacity for household targets. Overall, the UGA capacity of 289,000 additional
housing units can accommodate an estimated 277,000 households, more than twice the number
needed for the 106,000 households of remaining growth target over the remainder of the
planning period. Capacity sufficient to accommodate household targets exists within each
planning subarea and within each jurisdiction as well.
• Commercial and industrial land capacity. The UGA contains more than 6,000 net acres of
land suitable for non-residential development to accommodate job growth during the planning
period. Based on current plans and regulations, actual densities, and other factors, the UGA has
capacity for about 400,000 additional jobs in commercial and mixed-use zones and 123,000 jobs
in industrial zones.
• Sufficient capacity for job targets. Overall, the UGA capacity for approximately 527,000
additional jobs is double what is needed to accommodate the growth target of approximately
267,000 jobs for the remainder of the planning period. Capacity sufficient to accommodate job
targets exists within each planning subarea and within nearly all individual jurisdictions.
Chapters IV, V and VI of this report contain detailed countywide and subarea findings in all of these
areas. Chapter VII, the heart of the report, provides detailed information about each jurisdiction in
Urban King County.
2007 King County Buildable Lands Report I - 3
N
?eo
C.
V
Y
r+.
m
Q
O
U
Y
0) O
N
C) C •? ?
O M w M
LO
d o C O L
- C
w _ U N O
N
E O
co
U
C CL 3 am N
N N y M
N
(Q N LO •?
L N O O j
>
p to CIO
0
C: u C)
1- cn
c6 •+>• N N
w U uj Q N
E >(n
Qmw o
> c O c o
CL co
y c w
- N O
"? N C M
N ?' N L
Lo M
O O L
N
L CL O O
C C
4-- p N
N Yi Q n
w O O N
c N c Cl
N O C O y
O ??.•_
? ( E
E o " ? Q o
E L
0 0 0- O N
Q N N \ Q.
U N o M
0 15
En 0 O 0) *E
•(c c C
E ) N CL
N C 'E O O
E c
Q E
co ° o
o cn L
+r O U N
Co >
U a 0 3 vi c
c (Q
O N (4 c c
w o 7
L6 E
3 C
O 0 p
N L >
o Q c O C
O N
O
O to =3 E - co 't co :2
N : N -O N
E y= o c U)
o c ( 'v O
LL 7 E L cm =
N
O
N
?
O
O
N
O
1?
q
O
?
N
N
N
?
co
-
N
--t
N
CR
r
N
p
O
M
N
tf
e-
O
00 V O O M
^ LO LO
00
O) 00 1
O
V-
U
O
U N
U
N
(n N
U
0 L 0 'c 'c Lm m 'c 'C
FL z ? J z » c. z »
U. LL U.
N d. M N
N It co In
N
Z y
0 3
N fI- O
r r N O O N
C
J ?
? O
00 00 M Oi
O
d d L O N Lo 1-
Z d` ?
O CO N
V N
O L .- M LO
7
as
N N N I? r
?t CD
M O O N
V D U) m N O
` L
N 03
y 0)
N
M
N
000
O ` L
>w
C V d U U U U ?
4) 'a lu cu
U
(u
0
.
? o
V 7 7 7
a
x
C 4) M r-- O
m O H
O
N
O
M
LO
I?
w
ca m
a a
O
O
N
ri
O
O
N
N
N
N
w
O
j N
i m
Of
N
N 3
t? OO
? O
C ?
O
2 I
?
N 00 O
M ? •ct
N 0 0)
It M
O
O ?
N
N
N
O
N N
(D 0
0)
_ '
C)
N N
N
U a O
O N y
' E O "' co
O
r
E
C:
=
O
a)
N
O
?
N
i
p)
L
(6
O
N
O O
n U- N
75
'
0 -
fn L17
O p
O f-
O - (o
- E E E
ei C N v .c y
E D (D ) 3 0
F-
= U N
C y
C '? O
Z O
v O
N (?
'O C
0)
3
co
-CL
D
D
N
w
ri)
o _
.
_
E )
a 0) LL LL U- c 0
? z 01- w 0 ? _ E
x° z z = w
N LO ql? N d
O N U) Ln N
•- O O N T-
N 't N r
•-- N
q O CO N
N ~
co
m
U
Q
Q
O
z
V
d
N
r
0
0)
L OJ
L d
L N
L
co co fS3 flS U y
3
7
7
7
7
(6
O
A 'O F-
LL Cl) LID fl- O rN+
d i i
C n
O co Uf a
C LL
N
W t0 N
N
r d'
r ?
r
co (0 (n
CO M
Lo Co
A N
M e!
r O e-
(N O N
O O O
O N N
r N M
N CO O
d
3
q1
N
r
0 0) co N N N
m
a. U O O O
\
Co
C
O
D N
M CO 'D H
E O M M
L
0
V M am i +
CC) t E
E
.• rn M 0
-0 00
c Lo
(C O C
O O
N ?a c
X
L M a E
O L o
Q 0)
p C
ct.C
c
N a C
O
w V o c:'
L 7 ? ? N
L L C
0 O 7 L
4- 'D
V) C c O N C E
y N 15-
C w
c O 5
C
C) •>+ O
L tm
O =O 0 3
Q .C L ° o
(N w w
O N fU c
0.0 U N
M
a) o
L
CL
a) Q. 0 E C
t CD
C 3 0)
N C L .C
?'(p 0)
m E o cC
uS
a?
v7 ?e
?. L m
c N C c
0 N N
> E co _A
p o ? 3 E
N n 42
O C C N
(00 O (C 7 m
w O N ?_ y
-0 E c
v?
0) ? O.
2 a)
M vii ? E v
T
N N (N6 O
O 0 C N
-0 N U U C
Q M N O C)-
O N O (n L
>, °' L
o)E cv
C) C:
L
o .0
w O) M
w N C Q 0
( N •c O o N
C) Y .*- (n E
N c M E
.s m
E ° -7 7 o
(n LO LO (O O O T (c (D N
t1 w O cn
N O
CO T
N o
T 0
It T
cn M
ti
T N N
Z C O
v
U
...
C
N IA
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
A N C
J c c c c c c c c c c
W
to d to
E d V T
M
T
O
M
N
00
O
O
M
M
a1 > ? M ? C ? I? ? A C C
N
tQ ? ? N I?
U.
M T C(] N ti (O T 0 PI
(n 0) M 00 o T o O N O
y
d N N 00 - N M
0
Z t 0
0
d
L
ca
m
(? o O O O
C 0 0 (n (n
!_
_
a-- - t-- r
ao 0 0 o v o ° o 0 0 ?
3 .... O O O C O o l(7 In C C
a a (n
0
0
O e ' ? o L? o o ? ?
U
) Ul 0 C le o 0 o c c
? T T T o
(n (0 It (O am r- O
O
(n
N
O n I O T O O (V f*-
t M d O T O N N
L
U Q :?
N N N (n N (D T T O (n
N
rn 00 00 N CY) - N O o o 0
M a)
0)
(N
c
co
M (n M M M
L
Q (.? T T
'
^
V
\I
N
i C
O
N
c
? O
N
>i LL LL
m E N N
E " U U U
0 0 0 0 0 M -
= - - 0 0
0 -? (emu Co ` N M f- c O 'O "0 N F 7 iC
M 0
d a 'a 'a '
0 :3 0) CO -c 0 O
M (n II- a) U) T U) H
C ? c M O) T 00 C C
N > > > >
O co 0)
0 0) 0 (0 N 0)
N T tt T N It CO N
T T N
0) M ? LO M M (0 M
M t ti
•- N r N (n
U)
T
cl
T
o
M
N 00
T
0
o
M
M
r M 4 c 0 r,? 10 co c c
N 0 ?
T
CO (!) O O 0) f? N T O 01
I,- LO In M O 0 O T I? tG
(p 0 00 M N I- ?- O 0
0 0 o M o 0 0 o M M
(n (n m e Lo (C) 0 c c
°
?
O
?- O
T O
T c LO 010 0 O c c
0
O O O c LO LO LO LO c c
(n CO M (q It (O O O T (O
M N N T O O (O
d 0) a)
O7 N (q N? I, r N 00 00 LC)
O (t7 00 M 00 M O M to O?
co O d' O N O ?- !t
N T r (D T r 1?
N
0)
C
U) N
N
O
N
LL U- is
J U) E E N O
M U U U
M F-
O
U
U
U
0
0 U
m N
> N
O N
O E
C y
' 17 m
Q 7
' 7
' 7
' 7
? 0
'
O C7 o 0 o O
M 0)
M 00 o 7
O
U) T V
> i > CO O T 00 > >
CD a) 0
? of-1 1W
M
Z
Q
U-
O
V
V-
0
CL
N
N
cc
J
N
a
co
w
C
O
O
U
C
Y
r
0
0
N
Z
m
Q
O
U
V
N
N
M
- O -
M
r -
I- I-
- M
'-t W
N
t 00
-
(s, V
M
Ln qT
M
N
N
O
a) N
C
O
C ?
O
C
d N
+U' CL
4
a O
w
U C C C p
O N a+
N
(1) co 0) y > ?-
O 'c (n V
C N
C N O
N
> U
> 0)
3 C
o .
m
o CL
? C
v
0 C
U R
V
r - - O N U N U "
C N N N a)
=' O V
w
-'- ? " Vo
(
A
D
D v
0.
? =
?
o
tm
crl
N
0
N CL
() C C V
7 5 •x x
.
V
V
•?
7
Q U) U) < 2 E -
O O 0
U F
- F
- V
cB s w
C +? cv O
a) S E a)
o to j 'O
a-U a) ON
0) (D C-C O
O. C6 a) (D
O O
U p -O t O
N O a) N
E E -c p
C O E c:
fd O
a)
N U a
N ca
O)
o o $ c
U ? 0 ? ca
a) ? ,+N_+ U a
Q- C U N
O O a) Y
C C
y
O O
C) CD
(N c
L
'o 0
E a)
'n 00 a)
co n
cj > (p N L
-00
C) O N O d
t
N c N N Ln
`n
s E -3
a O C t o
L 2 - 0
> •a ?,? °'
O Qr9 S
an
CD
N
i
O
N
0
ti
O
r-
M
O
~
0
N
O
O
00
tD
N
Lo
N
o
M
O
C
?
M
O
CR 00
o
0
L M
O N
(D C
?t
O
t V
O O M
U LL U LL
O O O O
N ? N Of
a co a m cu
? a
m Q)
a 0
a ?
m C
a ?
a
0) J O O J O O
E y 0 0 0 0
E z u. ? ? z li U-
0
O
N
O
N
O
O
N
?D
CA
w
Q
0
a)
O
cn ? L
'OD C Co -0
O ' a) C c C
C)cuTEoEvioo•Fu
L
O 0) to ° E
CO N O . c -0 CD
O M - CD
L a c to p w '? O) s
-0 E C)0
O > a) O c9 •L •-, (p O
O a)o - 'OC O?wo )
V O O y
O O a) C:
O cn N C X cu 0 0 0) m
O a) N C cC s
O m r E a p O -C C F- ° a)'NM c M
p.cn
z U) 00 E c a) >O rnN
W L LO r - LP a)p 0 ? 'a N >
i C N N O) m 0 N
o L' c E E N •r
J a a) o L .a E o OU 00 E No
CL 0 CD C- N O CV _p N
O D
W a) ? w c p 4) E a0
r CD
Q o,oo3?ca
-cu
° a`)) a) a °o o_
H L L N Cl) a N N L
Z °o a) o E Lx L-
> p
V? a E p D
in N E y E 0 o U
C U L O m
O E .O p U ?_ 3 O 'p 'C
(? `_ tq U O j? O C C
W 0 3 co vi o Q o a) 0,CU
N a) ?,, N - p- a) a
E 4- c U m :3 v w O - a)
C + w -
OL O C N N O a)
O Z U- O .C a •a .2, O
co M
? M
0) O O O
>
d
LL
t
Q
ti
Q
M CO
N
tG
O r- r- dam'
O N M
LL
N M
O
O N
co
I` 'f
O co
ti
Z Q 6 -
Lo CO C"
N
ti
N I? O
r
00 (fl ?
fn ti
- co (O
d d U
) r N
`
Z Q ?
O N N
V N y O ? e-
O d
O 09 00
y N O LO un
L
O?
d; LO co
O
r N N
0
? Q 1VC
N ?- M
0) y 0 O CD
y N N
(7 Q A
N
D
a)
c x
0
1
C F-
?. m
w
E (n
N
E i
a
U
-
C
O
Z
u)
°o
N
O
O'
Q
' V .j M C Q
U
N 0) ?o
V)
O a)
V) O - v) N
0
M +J
' C lf? L
N a)
? o
N O Vl
y o 3 °' c
° i
a ° •?
> ° a° E
o i LO c
E a cu
c Q M O O? Q o" 00 3 L N (^O O
E a) N 0 p U) -0 N o O E> U c y` N N
° O N
c (n a) Z `?- fl. O O) o to i 0 c w O N O
Q a) ? n~ Q c
o
x
' )
.? N M a) a
a c -O a '
to M o C)
c v
to a)
Z, E
Z c F- a) 3 U _a Q a m o)
(? c O CL N t - vi Q O O V 'U w 0 V I+
L >
N a) v 0) c0 N
-O c O ;0 a) - L
3
e
Eo a) N o °) a
UEca a)
3
C ' w
) cn
c
o
i E
N? cv N
U
a)
2 v v
i
o c n (0 c Q?
si 0
? Zo v m b
o 0
- c
v ' (1)
0) CL Ui
7 O M T7
M r? LO
Z M
Q
t6
L
C) Lo C)
U-
V 4)
p 0 0 0 0
.- U ? c
ti
a
fn
o
?
O °.
i N O N c
N 0 00 O
A O ° N
V
L ? ?
r
r
M
V
O O M N
U)
N 4
N 6 L6
O d L
M 0)
? w
tp
Q
O
c
N 0)
O
y
O
. ? N o
O . a) N r
=
J v
N ? •? O
E
?
t6 F
-
c
(O
O
O
_a
Q
j
C
a
c
2
O to M (7
O LO CD fl
O It I- N
0 0 0 m
U) U) Lo _
0 0 0
LO O to c
O LO O c
O O to tq
O O 00 co
M M
00 1- M O
r t9 O 6
00 V) N M
O
V
J = d y H a
d N 0 d U
N 0
R
O .v a) N
. O
O a) . O
E N > O
> m
.o 0 X - 4
U
c E
W
M
LO
Cn
M (O
CO
h M
LO
O
N
r O
?
I-t
r M
O
ti
ti
r O
t?
O
(O O
00
w
r
r
N
N
O
N
N O
O
c O
U)
o CL
d
.
`a
CL
N o a) = U
? N p
N ?:, _ m
G H
0 .r
•
` O U
co .
O - V
O a) .? U d
D
?
U D
v E
o i
a
x o w
cm ? 0
U H W N
00 0) a) w
LO w4T LO
V ti In M
G. N 00
to
U
c y O M; T t`6
tea` ?.
E o Lo M r
M d
m (N O (0 ~
U") M CJ O
:
W CO F
6.
O N r-
0) 0)
le
O
V a ti
?
i
a) a
C
r+ w
N M
x o
c t\C
c m
c m
c
w
LL
M M d
L ? 9 9 C.
5
2
y
U. In M M -
c
t2 U. N O O
Q O
a r`
? (0
? 00
M r
M
l!? ? O M
J 4) O CD r; 00
N N
y Q- C
Z L r N
N C C
N
, N p
O ' N
c
J `
ty ? 0
E o . ..
= E a) ? _
U c
m >
M
J
CIO
Q
LL
Fem.
U
0
a
N
c
N
J
N
m
w
c
0
U
m
c
Y
0
0
N