HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-03-1986CITY OF AUBURN
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 3, 1986 7:30 p.m.
157
CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
~~ The regular meeting of the City of Auburn Council was called to
order by Mayor Bob Roegner at 7:30 p.m. in the City of Auburn
Council Chambers. Mayor Roegner led those in attendance in the
pledge of allegiance.
B. Roll Call
Those in attendance included Mayor Bob Roegner, Councilmembers
Brothers, Burns, Kurle, Larson, Whittall, and Wisner; staff mem-
bers Jack Bereiter, City Attorney; Len Chapman, Parks &
Recreation Director; Frank Currie, Public Works Director= Pat
Dugan, Finance Director; Jake Evans, Police Chief; Bob Johnson,
Fire Chief; Lynn Rued, Acting Planning Director; Gretel Sloan,
Personnel Director; and Darlene Cruz, City Clerk. Councilmember
Walters was excused.
C. Announcements and Appointments
1. Proclamations
a. Youth Art Month, March, 1986
Mayor Roegner read the proclamation and proclaimed
March Youth Art Month. The proclamation was presented
to Gertrude Sprenger, Auburn Arts Commission. The Mayor
encouraged the public to view the various winning
art being displayed in the City Hall lobby. Leslie
Moore, Arts Commission Member, was introduced to the
Council.
b. National Teacher Day, March 4, 1986.
The proclamation was read and March 4, 1986 was
proclaimed National Teacher Day. Mary Moore and Cathy
Hiroshi (President of Auburn Education Assoc.),
classroom teachers, were presented with the proclama-
t=on.
` 2. Employee of the Year Award
Officer Boti Karnofski was named Employee of the Year.
Karnofski has been employed with the City since 1981. He
is on the Board for Auburn Youth Resouces, a member of the
Auburn Substance Abuse Committee, and is one of two advi-
• sors for the Police Explorer's Unit. He is strongly
recognized as a major asset to the City and Auburn com-
munity, Mayor Roegner announced. The plaque designating
all the past "Employees of the Year" was presented to
Karnofski along with a well responding applaud.
Karnofski's parents, who had traveled from California, were
also in the audience..
3. Auburn Chamber of Commerce Annoucement
A proclamation was presented to the President of the Auburn
Chamber of Commerce earlier in the week.
' CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS 6 CORRESPONDENCE
II. A. Public Hearings
Annexation on West Valley Highway - 1.77+ acre parcel of
property located at the southwest corner of 37th St. N.W.
and the West Valley Highway.
No one spoke for or against the public hearing. MOTION by,
Burns, SECOND by Wisner to close the public hearing. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
-1-
158
AUBURN COUNCIL MINUTES PAGE TWO MARCH 3, 1986
II. Public Hearing (continued)
MOTION by Burns, SECOND by Wisner to approve the annexation and
to instruct the Planning staff to prepare a notice of intention
to be forwarded to the King County Boundary Review Soard; and
to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolu-
tion indicating the Council's action. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY
B. Audience Participation
Bob Smythe, attorney for Lloyd, spoke regarding Ordinances 4113
and 4119. Reforestation was his clients main concern. He
said it was not necessary to put trees in at this time. There
is no provision to remove diseased and dangerous trees. He
recommended there be a specific provision to trim trees for the
view. The provision would allow continued maintenance by the
landscaper. A request was made for consideration by the
Council on reopening the pit site prior to the ordinance taking
effect.
Leon Stucki, 724 Hi-Crest Dr., questioned what would happen if
dense housing (condominiums) is permitted and they later become
rentals because of default. He felt there should be a provi-
sion that would enforce protection against the housing becoming
total rental property.
Maris Hickson, 523 Aaby Dr., commented on different issues she
had concerns on. She felt this fall would be too soon for
reforestation, and the trees were too close to the adjoining
properties. A request was made for the Council to consider
disapproval of a 4-lane arterial because the traffic would not
be right. Hickson also voiced her desire for single family
housing regarding the area at issue.
Bob Smythe spoke regarding the sharing of the signalization '
cost. He said he felt there is a need for the signal, and
asked the Council to consider the issue of signalization to
be shared by the property owner of impact.
C. Correspondence included a letter from Bob Smyth dated 2/27/86.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
III. A. Municipal Services
Chairman Wisner reported the Committee met on 2/27/86.
Minutes are of public record.
B. Planning b Community Development
Chairman Burns reported the Committee met on 2/26/86.
Minutes are of public record.
C. Public Works
Chairman Larson reported the Committee met on 2/20/86, ar.d
the meeting on Thursday, February 6, 1986 has been can-
celled. Minutes are of public record.
D. Finance
Chairman Rurle reported the Committee met prior to the '
Council meeting. Minutes will be of public record when
they are transcribed.
CITIZEN INPUT
IV. Citizen Input - None
-2-
~ ., ``S. 1 „, t
AUBURN COUNCIL MINUTES PAGE THREE MARCH 3, 1986
CONSENT AGENDA
V. A. Minutes - February 18, Regular Meeting.
B. Vouchers
1. Payroll #113990-114333 in the amount of $403,996.12.
2. Claims #20301-20569 in the amount of $160,260.93.
C. Call for Public Hearing on "A" Street Annexation - .39
acre of property located at 2910 and 3002 "A" Street S.E.
D. Utilitv Bill Adjustment to account #323-2280 in the amount
of $404.09.
E. Liquor License - Eagle's Nest Restaurant, 1815 Howard Road.
F. Out of State Travel for Lt. Bob Reno, Fire Dept., to
attend the National Fire Academy, Emmitsburq, Maryland;
April 7-18, 1986.
G. Fireworks City Code 8.24.040 - Modification of the
current bail schedule for illegal possession or
discharge of fireworks.
MOTION by CARSON, SECOND by Wisner to approve Consent
Agenda Items A through G. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
OLD BUSINESS
VI. A. Ordinance 4113 - Repeals Ordinances 3549 and 3550, and
provides for a Special Property Use Permit for gravel removal
on property located on the east side of 60th Avenue South bet-
ween south 320th and 15th Street N.W.
159
Lynn Rued, Acting Planning Director, responding to Stucki's
question; said the ordinance has no control on rental or
purchased property. In responding to Symthe's letter regarding
removal of trees for view - Rued said view of neighbors who
' will look back into the pit is a greater impact than those
looking out'. Diseased or dangerous trees may be identified by
the landscape architect on the restoration plan which will need
the approval of the Planning Director. If approved the trees
may be removed. Referring to the Mt. View Terrace site plan -
the area in the green. is the same outline as the 1980 site plan
which indicates vegetation should remain as is, and Rued
referenced the area in red as being the catch points of those
not to be disturbed. The buffer area is as it should be, he
said.
Bob Smythe, in responding to Burns, said the site plan being
referenced by Rued was different as to what was suppose to have
been removed. He said Lloyd has indicated he would like to
have trees trimmed for view purposes. Desire was to cut down
trees so the valley and mountain could be viewed after the pit
is no longer a pit and is a residential area. It is unusual to
require a greenbelt between two single-family residential areas
if the gravel pit is no longer in existance, Smythe said. In
regards to removal aspect - even though the road grading may
not encroach as such on greenbelt, there are many things that
will impact the final phases of development. The very sharp
drop is not readily visible. Somewhere a retention pond may
have to exist, but a retention pond would not be feasible with
a greenbelt. When the road is in then the buffer area would be
' more known. The final development of property is unknown and
it would not be appropriate for the greenbelt to be brought out
at the present time, Smythe concluded.
-3-
160
AUBURN COUNCIL MINUTES PAGE FOUR MARCH 3, 1986
VI. OLD BUSINESS (continued)
Larson asked about the site plan. Rued said the site plan was
submitted in the Conditional Use Permit application. There
will' be two large benches in the middle of the pit which will
accommodate the attached housing (approximately 300 units).
The existing property will be abutting the housing being put in.
Hi-Crest Drive will be quite a distance in area and there will
be a change in elevation. As far as mining being done it was
determined that the greenbelt was important for homes off Aaby
Drive than for dividing the areas.
Rued responding to Kurle's question regarding building struc-
ture said there is no limit on how many units may be built per
structure. Each family unit has 6,000 feet for every unit
which excludes the public road, but the vertical cliff would be
included.
There is a change between the site plans (plan being referenced
and the plan referenced at the 2/18/86 Council meeting) due to
the actual field inspection survey - the south east corner of
the property does not indicate a ridge that exists there, Rued
informed the Council.
Larson questioned the difference in elevation between the
benches and Aaby Drive. Rued responded Aaby Drive is signifi-
cantly lower than the benches. Larson felt the trees will not
be needed after the mining operation is done because the
buildings would be in place. Larson inquired if the trees
could be restored. Since building permits are needed prior to
building, could they be tied on to the permits rather than to
this ordinance, he asked. It could be, Rued replied. Larson
recommended to go ahead with Ordinance 4113, modifications and
reforestation to the site plan so as to allow staff time to
review drainage plan.
Wisner felt the trees would ultimately have to be cut, and
believed it should be done now. She strongly recommended the
greenbelt be out of the Council's jurisdiction, and reforesta-
tion be done at the earliest time.
MOTION by Burns, SECOND by Wisner to introduce and adopt
Ordinance 4113. Larson voted no. MOTION CARRIED
B. Ordinance 4114 - Provides for a Conditional Use Permit on pro-
perty zoned R-2 (Single Family) located on the east side of
60th Avenue South between 320th and 15th Street N.W.
Question by Rurle on traffic light was directed to Smythe.
Smythe said Section 5 and the conclusions portion of the ordi-
nance, did not say anything specific on the signalization
funding. Rued informed the Council Lloyd may form an L.I.D. at
his option which would make the funding of the signalization
shared, otherwise the responsibility would be on Lloyd.
Whittall did not agree with Section 2, and MOTIONED to amend
Ordinance 4114 by the elimination of Section 2 which authorizes
construction of attached residential housing; SECOND by Rurle.
Motion did not carry. Rued informed the Council the basic
intent for Ordinance 4114 is to authorize attached housing. If
just single family housing is desired then Ordinance 4114 is not
necessary.
-4-
~'
161
AUBURN COUNCIL MINUTES PAGE FIVE MARCH 3, 1986
VI. OLD BUSINESS (continued)
Dugan said approval of the Conditional Use Permit may be the
only opportunity for the Council to support multi-family deve-
lopment to be built without a plat. Single family developments
require a plat.
Larson asked about the impact on grading requirements from a
multi-family to a single-family. Dugan responded continuity
with what has been planned has been maintained. If the
Comprehensive Use Permit is not approved then a single-family
contour where the building would be built will be very
inefficient. The road configuration is tied to one place. The
interior benches -the upper part has been established, the
lower part may have a way to go. Single family would present
difficulty on the grades.
Whittall felt a multi-family development should not be built
just because it was in the 1980 site plan. He believed what the
people desired (single-family housing) should take precedence
over the site plan.
Burns spoke concerning the outcome if Ordinance 4114 failed.
He felt Lloyd would not be able to develop single-family
housing, and the property would have to be sold since it would
not be financially feasible. There should be multi-family on
the hillside, which is an appropriate way to develop the area.
Citizens would get a road they need, and there would be a
buffer, he said.
Whittall felt a four-lane arterial up the hill was not
warranted, but a'two-lane road would be sufficient.
Burns disagreed with Whittall because of the public safety
aspect. There is a 14-16 minute delay to get up that hill for
emergency aid, he said.
MOTION by Burns, SECOND by Wisner to introduce and adopt
Ordinance 4114. Whittall and Kurle voted no. MOTION CARRIED
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Ordinance 4115 - Authorizes the Mayor to accept Schedule "A"
which relates to the City of Auburn 1986 budget reallocation of
funds in various accounts in several funds. MOTION by Rurle,
SECOND by Larson to introduce and adopt Ordinance 4115. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
B. Ordinance 4116 - Provides for the rezoning of a parcel of land
5.09 acres in size located on the north side of 21st Street
S.E. in the 200-300 blocks, within the City of Auburn, changing
the zoning classification thereof from M-2 and R-4 to R-3.
MOTION by BURNS, SECOND by Wisner to introduce and adopt
Ordinance 4115. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
C. Ordinance 4117 - Amends Section 17.18.190 and 17.32.050 of
Chapter 17 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Auburn,
pertaining to the subdivision ordinance. MOTION by Burns,
SECOND by Wisner to introduce and adopt Ordinance 4117. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
D. Resolution 1668 - Orders the Finance Director to make segrega-
tion on the original Assessment Roll of Local Improvement
District No. 318, Assessment No. 28. MOTION by Kurle, SECOND
by Larson to adopt Resolution 1668. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
-5-
f - _~ ~ ~
162
AUBURN COUNCIL MINUTES PAGE SIX MARCH 3, 1986
VII. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
E. Resolution 1669 - Orders the Finance Director to make segrega-
tion on the original Assessment Roll of Local Improvement
District No. 322, Assessment No. 12. MOTION by Kurle, SECOND
by Larson to adopt Resolution 1669. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
F. Resolution 1671 - Authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute an agreement with Corporate Health Designs to provide
health care cost containment consultant services. MOTION by
Kurle, SECOND by Whittall to adopt Resolution 1671. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
G. Resolution 1672 - Authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute a contract with Rea Annette Bachman for indigent
screening services. MOTION by Kurle, SECOND by Whittall to
adopt Resolution 1672. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MAYOR'S REPORT
VIII. Mayor's Report - None
EXECUTIVE SESSION and ADJOURNMENT
IX. The meeting was adjourned to an executive session to discuss real
-property matters at 8:58 p.m.
ar ene ruz, ty erc
-6-
,~ x < .