HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-02-1992
CITY OF AUBURN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 2, 1992 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City of Auburn Council was called to order by Mayor
Bob Roegner at 7:30 p.m. in the City of Auburn Council Chambers.
A. Flag Salute
Mayor Roegner led those in attendance in the pledge of allegiance.
B. Roll Call
Those in attendance included Mayor Bob Roegner and Councilmembers
Whittall, Wagner, Burns, Borden, Barber, Brothers, and Kurle. Staff
members in attendance included Fire Chief Bob Johnson, Police Chief Jake
Evans, Personnel Director Pam Sime, Parks & Recreation Director Len
Chapman, Finance Director Pat Dugan, Public Works Director Frank Currie,
Planning Director Steve Lancaster, City Attorney Stephen R. Shelton, City
Clerk Robin Wohlhueter, and Deputy City Clerk Gayle Butcher. Other staff
members in attendance included Police Lieutenant Bob Almy, Library
Director Mary Stanton, Senior Planners Lynn Rued and Lois Stark.
C. Announcements and ADDointments
I. Announcements - None
2. ADDointments
A3.8
a. Librarv Board
Council to consider the Mayor's appointment of Bob Wiley to the
Library Board for a term to expire on December 31, 1996.
Motion by Councilmember Kurle, second by Councilmember
Burns to confirm the appointment of Bob Wiley to the Library
Board for a term to expire on December 31, 1996.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7 -0.
D. Agenda Modifications
Mayor Roegner noted agenda modifications this evening are Item II.C.I.
transmitting correspondence from Pearl McElheran, Manager from King
County Real Property Division with regard to LID 344 dated February 27,
1992, which is on this evening's agenda as Public Hearing Item II.A.I, and
from Fred Meyer, Inc. dated March 2, 1992 regarding the Auburn North
Central Business District Plan, which is on this evening's agenda as Old
Business Item V.A.
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
II. CITIZEN INPUT. PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Hearings
1. Local Imorovement District 344
F2.4.9 LID 344, 04.9.1 St Imp 292
The final assessment roll for Local Improvement District 344 for the
construction of new sidewalks, low level pedestrian lighting and related
work, along East Main Street from Auburn Way North to Auburn
A venue. All persons are encouraged to voice an opinion at this time.
Mayor Roegner opened the public hearing and requested public comment.
Jack Rucinskv. 10625 Marine View Drive. Seattle. W A 98146
Mr. Rucinsky expressed his concerns on the method used for determining
his assessment for LID 344. Mr. Rucinsky felt the assessment should be
based upon square footage since lease agreements and property purchases
are valued at square footage. Mr. Rucinsky does not feel his assessment
is fair and presented examples of other assessment lots within LID 344
which have larger square footage lots than his property and are assessed
less.
There were no further requests to speak for or against Local Improvement
District 344.
Motion by Councilmember Whittall, second by Councilmember Burns, to
close the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
Councilmember Whittall inquired how the assessments were determined.
Public Works Director Frank Currie responded properties were assessed
based on sidewalk frontage, which is a common way to assess local
improvement districts.
Motion by Councilmember Whittall, second by Councilmember Burns, to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4548.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
2. Aoolication No. COM0004-91
03.4.3 COM0004-91, 03.7
Consideration of the adoption of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to
implement policy changes regarding critical areas and resource lands and
amendment of the Environmental Review Procedures Ordinance to meet the
mandates of the State Growth Management Act.
Prior to consideration of Public Hearing Item II.A.2, Mayor Roegner
requested Senior Planner Lois Stark present a brief overview.
Lois Stark noted the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the
Environmental Review Procedures Ordinance are mandated by the Growth
PAGE 2
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
Management Act to assure conservation of resource lands, such as
agricultural and mineral lands, and critical areas which are wetlands,
geological hazards, fish and wildlife areas, frequently flooded areas, and
aquifer recharge areas. The proposed amendments do not require additional
staffing. Ms. Stark further noted public meetings and hearings had been
held by the Planning & Community Development Committee, and the
Planning Commission, and that no significant concerns had been raised.
Mayor Roegner opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak
for or against Application No. COM0004-91.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Council member Barber, to close
the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0
Motion by Council member Burns, second by Councilmember Barber to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4544.
Councilmember Whitta]] requested a clarification on the how the policy
recommendation might impact the Lakeview development. Planning Director
Lancaster responded that the primary purpose of designating mineral
resource lands is to protect such lands from incompatible new development
that could affect the ability to mine. One of the criteria suggested by the
State for designating mineral resource lands is that they not lie within areas
already characterized by urban levels of development. In Auburn, we have
determined that the only area with significant gravel deposits and not
already affected by nearby urban development is the south Stuck River area.
In response to Councilmember Whitta]]'s question on aquifer recharge areas,
Mr. Lancaster stated that an area-wide aquifer management program is
currently underway under the leadership of the Seattle/King County Health
Department. Staff believes the City should not make significant decisions
regarding the city-wide aquifer protection requirements until that study has
been completed, and this approach is supported by the State. In response to
Mr. Whitta]]'s question regarding the additional definitions to be added to
Auburn's Environmental Review Procedures Ordinance, Mr. Lancaster stated
the purpose of these definitions is to require that short subdivisions be
subject to environmental review procedures if they lie within the defined
areas. Currently, short subdivisions are exempt from the SEP A process.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to
approve Resolution No. 2281.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
B. Audience Particioation
Bill Morchin. 1345 East Main ST. Auburn. W A 98002
Mr. Morchin expressed his concerns regarding the lack of city staff
communication with the Business Improvement Area members. He stated
PAGE 3
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
there are errors regarding traffic predictions in the study completed for the
Auburn North Business Area Plan, and Mr. Morchin stated city staff
withheld information regarding these errors. He recommended this item be
continued in order to review impacts on traffic.
Steve Cogan. 3800 SE 22nd Av. Portland. OR 97242
Mr. Cogan works for Fred Meyer, Inc. and noted a]] Councilmembers had
received a copy of Fred Meyer's letter outlining what Fred Meyer's position
is with regard to the Auburn North Business Area Plan. Fred Meyer is
requesting the developed store be excluded from the Auburn North Business
Planning Area and retain the heavy commercial district zoning designation.
Fred Meyer, Inc. believes this is consistent with the store's expectations
when they developed the store approximately 4 years ago, and Fred Meyer
feels any zoning change would subject them to a competitive disadvantage.
Mr. Cogan further stated Fred Meyer wants equal zoning treatment as the
Auburn North Shopping area.
Mr. Cogan stated Fred Meyer is willing to accept a new classification for
their undeveloped site with the exception of Land Use Policy #7 which
regulates drive-in facilities. Fred Meyer wants Land Use Policy #7 of the
Auburn North Business Area Plan removed. Fred Meyer believes the
surrounding area is not pedestrian-friendly, but rather an established drive-
in character is already in place.
Stan Piha. 4th & Blanchard Building. 2101 4th A V. Suite 2375. Seattle. WA
98121
Mr. Piha noted he is a real estate representative for the applicant on
Application No. V ACOOO 1-91, and he was available to address any questions
the Council may have with regard to the vacation of a street right-of-way
known as 8th Street SE between D Street SE and Auburn Way South.
There were no further requests for audience participation.
C. Corresoondence
Under Agenda Modifications of these minutes, Items II.C.I and II.C.2, were
transmitted. The letters related to VII.A.5 and V.A. of these minutes.
III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A3.6.4.4
A. Municioal Services
Chairman Brothers reported that the Municipal Services Committee did not
met prior to the Council meeting. The next Municipal Services meeting is
Monday, March 16, 1992 at 4:30 p.m.
B. Planning & Community Develooment
Chairman Burns reported that the Planning & Community Development
Committee met on February 25, 1992 and the minutes are of public record.
Chairman Burns noted the Auburn North Business Area Plan had been
referred back to the Planning & Community Development Committee from
the last Council meeting. He further noted comments with regard to the
Auburn North Business Area will be expressed under this evening's agenda
PAGE 4
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
Item V.A. The next meeting of the Planning & Community Development
will be Tuesday, March 10, 1992 at 7:30 p.m.
C. Public Works
Chairman Whitta]] reported that the Public Works Committee met prior to
the Council meeting at 5:30 p.m. The next meeting of the Public Works
Committee is scheduled for Monday, March 16, 1992 at 5:30 p.m.
D. Finance
Chairman Barber reported that the Finance Committee met prior to the
Council meeting this evening at 7:00 p.m. and discussed Consent Agenda
Items. The next meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled for
Monday, March 16, 1992 at 7:00 p.m.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes
A3.6.2
1. Minutes of the February 18, 1992 regular Council meeting.
B. Vouchers
F4.9.2, F4.9.5
1. Claim numbers 70114 through 70499 in the amount of $423,031.61 and
dated March 2, 1992.
2. Payroll check numbers 176015 through 176460 in the amount of
$612,749.28 covering the period February 13, 1992 through February
21, 1992.
C. Ca]] for Public Hearing
03.11, F5.4.3
Request Council approval of the recommendations of the Human Resource
Committee for the use of $278,000 in 1992-1993 City of Auburn Community
Development Block Grant Funds, and to ca]] for a public hearing to be held
on March 16, 1992 to receive public input on proposals submitted.
D. Surolus Prooerty
F4.6.1 Ro]]ing Stock
1. Public Works
Request permission to surplus and se]] at the next auction the fo]]owing
vehicles.
6102B 1981 Dodge Maxivan Serial No. 2B7HB23P7BK245655
640lB 1982 Ford Escort Serial No. IFABP0527CR1l6252
6406B 1984 Dodge Pickup Serial No. lB7FD 14H I ES339432
6462A 1985 Roller Trailer Serial No. TS850061
FD021 1981 Ford Escort Serial No. IFABP0629CRl21239
FD022 1981 Plymouth Horizon Serial No. I P3BLZ8B7BD220667
FD029 1986 Pontiac Grand Am Serial No. I G2NV69L4GC520027
FD036 1985 Dodge Omni Serial No. lB3BZ18CE8D272879
PD027 1985 Chevrolet Impala Serial No. IGIBL69ZXFH130309
PD044 1981 Plymouth Carave]]e Serial No. IP3BJ46D9F273968
PAGE 5
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
PD045 1984 Buick Regal Serial No. IG4AJ47AXEH470970
PD051 1984 Chevrolet Caprice Serial No. 2GIAN69H4E9168764
E. Utility Bill Ad iustment
F4.5.2
Recommend approval of utility adjustment to account 213-2740 in the
amount of $131.95.
F. Contract Administration
1. Street Imorovement No. 281
04.9.1 Street Improvement No. 281
Approve Final Pay Estimate No.5, Contract 91-0 I, to Robison
Construction, Inc. in the amount of $26,110.11, for street and utility
construction.
2. Street Imorovement No. 276
04.9.1 Street Imp No. 276
Approve Final Pay Estimate No. II, Contract 90-05, to R. W. Scott
Construction, Inc. in the amount of $16,451.70, for street and utility
construction.
3. Street Imorovement No. 294
04.9.1 Street Improvement No. 294
Approve Final Pay Estimate No. I, Contract 91-10, to M. A. Segale, Inc.
in the amount of $43,276.59, for intersection improvements at 15th Street
S.W. and West Va]]ey Highway.
Motion by Councilmember Kurle, second by Council member Burns to
approve Consent Agenda Items IV.A. through IV.F.3.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Aoolication No. COM0003-91
03.4.3 COM0003-91, 03.4.4, 03.4.5, 03.4.2.1
Council to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan text and map,
the Zoning map and text for the purpose of adopting and implementing the
Auburn North Business Area Plan.
Councilmember Burns took note of Mr. Bill Morchin's comments under
audience participation as well of Fred Meyer's audience participation
concern of maintaining a competitive advantage. Councilmember Burns
requested planning staff to comment on the concept of grandfathering the
heavy commercial zoning for Fred Meyer, Inc. within the Auburn North
Business Area Plan.
Senior Planner Lynn Rued explained that Fred Meyer would not become a
non-conforming use if zoned C-3 and left in the planning area. Any new
addition or parking area would have to comply with the plan policies. If the
addition would exceed 50% of the valuation of the existing building, then
PAGE 6
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
the landscaping policies would be implemented for the entire Fred Meyer
site. Mr. Rued also noted the importance of a pedestrian-friendly area that
would be accomplished with using "A" Street NE at the south end of Fred
Meyer Store.
Councilmember Whittall felt that it was not fair to Fred Meyer, Inc. to
change zoning requirements at this time. He expressed his concern that this
action may indicate an unfriendly attitude toward businesses.
Councilmember Whitta]] is supporting Fred Meyer's position.
Councilmember Whitta]] asked for a response to Mr. Morchin's comments
during audience participation with regard to errors by the traffic consultant.
Planning Director Lancaster noted the consultant had redistributed the traffic
predictions based upon Mr. Morchin's ideas, but the results did not make a
significant difference in analysis. Planning Director noted the information
was available at the Planning & Community Development Committee of
February 25, 1992 and that this information was not withheld. Mr.
Lancaster emphasized that the EIS traffic analysis accurately compared
projected year 2000 traffic under existing zoning, with projected traffic
under the proposed plan and zoning. The difference is estimated at 479
peak hour trips, which is roughly equivalent to the trips that would be
generated by a moderate sized supermarket. Mr. Lancaster also emphasized
that the traffic analysis, as part of an area-wide planning process, cannot be
as specific and refined as a project-specific analysis. He stated that staff
continues to believe the EIS provides a good basis for understanding the
impacts of this plan proposal.
Planning Director Lancaster also expressed his opinion that the BIA has been
involved in the planning process and noted that BIA Director Greg Vine has
testified twice to the City Council that the BIA does not object to the
Auburn North Planning Area Plan. Mr. Vine was present when this issue
was referred to the Planning and Community Development Committee. Mr.
Lancaster feels city staff has worked very hard to satisfy Mr. Morchin's
concerns.
Councilmember Kurle expressed his concern that he is unsure whether Mr.
Morchin's comments are his or on behalf of the BIA. Councilmember Kurle
is also requesting clarification of the mistake the consultant admitted to
regarding traffic predictions for the Auburn North Business Area. Senior
Planner Rued explained there were three traffic scenarios within the
Environmental Impact Statement. One scenario was existing zoning, the
second was the forecast build out scenario, and the third was optimum
development. The traffic consultant projected the traffic counts for
scenarios one and three. For scenario two, he reduced the traffic counts by
the difference of building area between scenarios two and three, which is an
incorrect way to estimate traffic counts. Mr. Rued gave examples of the
revised traffic counts for the area using the correct method for traffic
projection.
Councilmember Kurle noted the consultant's mistake Mr. Morchin has
expressed concern over does not appear to be too significant.
PAGE 7
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
Councilmember Kurle respectfu]]y disagreed with Mr. Morchin's comment
that he had been ignored by city staff. Councilmember Kurle agreed with
Fred Meyer's opinion that drive-in facilities are we]] established in the area.
Councilmember Wagner expressed his concern of changing zoning rules on a
firm that has made a considerable investment in the area. Council member
Wagner is supporting Fred Meyer's position.
Councilmember Burns stated he shared concerns of Fred Meyer's investment
and time frame involved in changing zoning regulations, and due to these
concerns, Councilmember Burns noted his Committee had developed a
compromise before the Council this evening. Councilmember Burns
explained the Auburn North Business Area Plan was important to create a
pedestrian-oriented business community that coexisted with the downtown
area. He noted that drive-in facilities effectively divides and discourages
pedestrian uses, and Councilmember Burns encouraged those interested
persons to view neighborhoods that have drive-in facilities in order to better
understand the whole concept of the Auburn North Business Area Plan.
Councilmember Burns further noted if the Fred Meyer Store would be
destroyed, then conformance would be required.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to
amend the Comprehensive Plan text and map, the Zoning Map and text for
the purpose of adopting and implementing the Auburn North Business Area
Plan with heavy commercial zone C-3 for the Fred Meyer Store site.
MOTION CARRIED 4-3. Councilmembers Whitta]], Wagner and Kurle
voting no.
B. Aoolication No. VACOOOI-91
03.9 Application No. V ACOOO 1-91
A petition has been filed for the vacation of a street right-of -way known as
8th St SE between D Street SE and Auburn Way South, within the City of
Auburn.
Councilmember Whitta]] noted this item was referred to the Public Works
Committee at the 2/ I 8/92 Council meeting, and that concerns had been
resolved, and Councilmember Whittall was recommending the Council
approve the vacation.
Noting that a legal instrument was not part of this evening's agenda, City
Attorney Shelton advised the Council could approve the vacation and the
Legal Department would prepare an ordinance and assign it as Ordinance
No. 4550.
Motion by Councilmember Whitta]], second by Council member Wagner to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4550.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
PAGE 8
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
A. Aoolication No. ANXOOO 1-92
03.1 Application No. ANXOOOI-92
Council consideration for authorization for the Planning Department to
proceed in the preparation of the annexation petition on the request to annex
a 5.2 acre parcel of property located on the east City limits of Auburn.
Motion by Council member Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to
authorize the preparation and circulation of a petition for annexation.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
B. Aoolication No. CUP0006-91
03.1 0.1 CUP0006-91
Council consideration of the request of Stobie & Associates for a Conditional
Use Permit to allow construction of 4-duplexes and 2-triplexes on property
zoned R-3 (Duplex) and located on the south side of 18th Street N.E. in the
1100 block.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden to
approve the Conditional Use Permit based upon the Hearing Examiner's
Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Conditions and to instruct the City
Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
Councilmembers discussed fencing, landscape, and health concerns with
regard to CUP0006-92. Due to concerns expressed, Council member Burns
withdrew his motion.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to ca]]
for a public hearing on Application No. CUP0006-92 at the next Council
meeting.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
C. Aoolication No. CUP0008-91
03.10.1 CUP0008-91
Council consideration on the request of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints - NW Area for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to
a]]ow construction of a building that will be used as a seminary that will
operate as a 30-36 desk religious educational classroom for high school
students to be located at 331 4th Street N.E.
Planning Director Steve Lancaster noted there was a typographical error on
page 3, Item 4 of Conclusions of Law, of the Hearing Examiner's Findings
and Recommendations. Item 4 reads "The proposal will adversely affect the
public infrastructure." Item 4 should read "The proposal will not adversely
affect the public infrastructure."
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden, to
approve the conditional Use Permit based upon the Hearing Examiner's
PAGE 9
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
Findings of Fact, amended Conclusions and Conditions, and to instruct the
City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
D. Aoolication No. CUP0009-9l
03.10.1 CUP0009-9l
Council to consider the request of Cindy Huang for a Conditional Use
Permit to a]]ow construction of two 4-plexes on property zoned R-3
(Duplex) and located at 2025 M Street NE.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to
approve the Conditional Use Permit based upon the Hearing Examiner's
Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Conditions and to instruct the City
Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Ordinances
City Attorney Stephen R. Shelton read the titles to each ordinance which
were not approved out of order.
I. Ordinance No. 4544
03.7, 03.4.3 COM0004-91
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
amending Section 16.06.030, which is contained in Chapter 16.06 of
the Auburn City Code entitled "Environmental Review Procedures" and
adding a new Section 16.06.065 to Chapter 16.06 to meet the
requirements of the Growth Management Act (36.70A RCW).
Ordinance No. 4544 was approved under Item II.A.2. of these minutes.
2. Ordinance No. 4546
03.8 REZ0003-91 CP
An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, providing for the
rezoning of property located on the west side of Dogwood Street S.E.
in the 1300-1400 blocks, within the City of Auburn, Washington,
changing the zoning classification thereof from R-I (Single Family) to
P-I (Public Use District) and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
from Single Family to Public and Quasi Public.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden,
to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4546.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
3. Ordinance No. 4547
03.4.4, 03.4.5, 03.4.2.1.2
PAGE 10
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending the
official Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance for the City of Auburn,
Washington, pursuant to the provisions of R.C.W. Chapter 35A.63 of
the laws of the State of Washington and directing that this ordinance
be filed with the Auburn City Clerk and be available for public
inspection.
Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to introduce
and adopt Ordinance No. 4547.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
4. Ordinance No. 4548
F2.4.9 LID 344, 04.9.1 St Imp 292
An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving and
confirming the assessments and assessment ro]] of Local Improvement
District No. 344 for the construction and improvement (Street
Improvement No. 292) of East Main Street from Auburn Avenue to
Auburn Way North, within the County of King, State of Washington,
as provided by Ordinance No. 4499, and levying and assessing the cost
and expense thereof against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land and
other property as shown on the assessment roll.
Ordinance No. 4548 was approved under Item II.A.I. of these minutes.
5. Ordinance No. 4549
04.9.1. Street Improvement No. 287
An Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the
acquisition of certain property and property rights by eminent domain
providing for the payment thereof; authorizing the City Attorney to
prepare a petition for condemnation in the Superior Court in and for
the County of King and for the prosecution thereof for the acquisition
of such property and property rights for roadway purposes (right-of-
way on Auburn Way South near Academy Drive S.E. Street
Improvement No. 287).
Motion by Councilmember Whitta]], second by Councilmember
Wagner, to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4549.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
6. Ordinance No. 4550
Ordinance No. 4550 was approved under Item V.B of these minutes.
B. Resolutions
City Attorney Stephen R. Shelton read the titles to each resolution which
were not approved out of order.
1. Resolution No. 2281
03.4.3 COM0004-91, 03.7
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
amending the Comprehensive Plan policies of the City of Auburn,
PAGE II
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
Washington to add definitions and policies relating to resource lands
and critical areas, and to designate said amendments as guidelines for
exercising the City's authority under (SEP A) and directing that this
resolution as adopted and approved be filed with the Auburn City
Clerk and be available for public inspection.
Resolution No. 2281 was approved under Item II.A.2 of these minutes.
2. Resolution No. 2283
03.4.4, 03.4.5, 03.4.2.1.2, 03.4.3 COM0003-91
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
adopting and approving the Auburn North Business Area Plan as an
element of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Auburn,
Washington, pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 35A.63 of the
laws of the State of Washington, and designating this element as
guidelines for exercising the City's authority under SEPA, and
directing that this resolution and the element of the Comprehensive
Plan it adopts and approves be filed with the Auburn City Clerk and
be available for public inspection.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Council member Borden,
to approve Resolution No. 2283.
MOTION CARRIED 4-3. Councilmembers Whittall, Wagner, and
Kurle voting no.
3. Resolution No. 2284
A3.13.2
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
repealing Resolution No. 1089 passed May 5, 1980 that authorized
certain easements and agreements between the City and Robert B.
McLean, M.D. and Janet K. McLean, his wife.
Motion by Councilmember Whittall, second by Councilmember
Wagner, to approve Resolution no. 2284.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
4. Resolution No. 2285
04.9.1 Street Improvement No. 281
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with
King County for the construction and design of a traffic control
signalization system and channelization improvements at the
intersection of East Va]]ey Highway South (Auburn Way North) and
South 277th Street (52nd Street Northeast).
Motion by Councilmember Whittall, second by Council member
Wagner, to approve Resolution No. 2285.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
PAGE 12
CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING
March 2, 1992
5. Resolution No. 2286
04.4.9.2
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Auburn to
execute Amendment No. I to engineering services contract dated
October 21, 1991 with W & H Pacific, Inc., for 1992 Auburn
Municipal Airport Improvement Program to construct taxiway lighting
system.
Motion by Councilmember Whitta]], second by Councilmember
Wagner, to approve Resolution No. 2286.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0
VIII. MAYOR'S REPORT - None.
Executive Session - None
IX. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Auburn City Council, the
meeting adjourned at 9:02 p.m.
Bob Roegner, Mayor
'",~:.,._, .....,-~.~.,
Gayle Butcher, Deputy City Clerk
92M2-18
PAGE 13