HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-19-1994
c\tyor
~."jÅ
Auburn
~
q$J,in~~
CITY OF AUBURN
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
September 19, 1994
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. FlaS! Salute
Mayor Booth called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and led those in attendance in the
pledge of allegiance.
B. Roll Call
Those in attendance included Mayor Booth and Members of the Auburn City Council as
follows: Burns, Wagner, Haugen, Borden, Barber, Brothers and Kurle. Staff members
present included Police Chief Dave Purdy, Fire Chief Bob Johnson, Parks and
Recreation Director Len Chapman, Planning Director Paul Krauss, Public Works
Director Frank Currie, Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds, Finance Director Vie
Thompson, Senior Planner Lynn Rued, City Clerk Robin Wohlhueter, and Deputy City
Clerk Gayle Butcher.
C. Announcements and Aooointments
1. Announcements
a. EmDlovee of the Year for 1993
Mayor Booth recognized City of Auburn Maintenance Worker Mike
Browne as Employee of the Year for 1993. Mayor Booth stated Mr.
Browne is unable to attend the Council meeting this evening, but he will
personally present the plaque to Mr. Brown tomorrow. Showing the
plaque to the audience, Mayor Booth stated Mr. Browne is deserving of
this award, and noted many of the positive attributes of Mr. Browne
which earned him the honor of becoming Employee of the Year for 1993.
b. Ooen Houses
Planning Director Paul Krauss was asked by Mayor Booth to announce
upcoming open houses for all citizens of Auburn to attend. Planning
Director Krauss noted on September 27, 1994 the Planning Commission
will solicit public comment on the Commuter Rail Station Siting Study
and draft amendments to the Comprehensive Plan from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, and on October 4, 1994 there
will be a Planning Commission public hearing on the draft amendments
on the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Aooointments
There were no appointments to be considered this evening.
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page NO.2
September 19, 1994
D. A2enda Modifications
Agenda modifications include Agenda Item IV.D, a request to advertise for a request for
proposal regarding a telephone system upgrade, Agenda Items VI.A, which transmits
additional agenda bill pages and attachments, and VI.B which removes council
consideration of Condition 8.k.4 of Ordinance No. 4649.
II. CITIZEN INPUT. PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Hearin2s
There were no public hearings this evening.
B. Audience Particioation
A3.6.4.1
Mayor Booth said he received a phone call from Mr. Mike Bocatch. Mr. Bocatch is ill
today, and he asked Mayor Booth to relay his citizen's concern that indigents are sitting
on benches near Safeway.
Mayor Booth invited citizens in the audience to make any comments or suggestions they
wished to bring to the attention of the City Council.
Linda Caverlv. 135 15th Street S. E.. Auburn
Ms. Caverly stated discontent with the Public Works Committee and city planner for
allowing public works projects on all major arterials within the city right now. She
believes city staff exhibited incompetence in bidding street projects whieh would occur
at the same time. She believes the street construction activity has impaired emergency
response times for police officers and firefighters.
Laurie Rodarte. 223 15th Street S.E.. Auburn
Ms. Rodarte askéd her daughter to stand with her. Ms. Rodarte requested her daughter
take off her sunglasses so that Councilmembers could see her black eye. Ms. Rodarte
told the Councilmembers her daughter had been attacked by a group of youths at 17th
Street S. E. at 1:00 a.m. this past weekend. Her daughter's injuries are from being
kieked, punched, and hit with a glass bottle. Not only does her daughter have a black
eye, but she also required stitches, has a concussion, and a swollen jaw.
Ms. Rodarte does not understand why the streets of Auburn are not safe for her
daughter. She has spoken with the Police Chief and the Mayor. She stated she has also
attempted to contact her Legislators, but her calls have not been returned. She is asking
the Auburn City Council to use their positions as elected officials to lobby the state
Legislature to change the juvenile laws. Ms. Rodarte stated she has no parental rights in
the event her child decides to disobey.
Ms. Rodarte stated one of her daughter's attackers has been in and out of Juvenile Hall,
is known by police offieers, and has recently been accused of attacking a person with a
knife. She believes the City Council has more influence with the state Legislature than
an every-day citizen.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 3
September 19, 1994
Councilmember Haugen thanked Ms. Rodarte for coming before the Council. She asked
Ms. Rodarte for her opinion of a curfew law in the city of Auburn. Ms. Rodarte stated
she felt the city needed one. She also noted that she has no insurance, and she has
indicated to Mayor Booth that she is presenting him with the bill for medical treatment.
Councilmember Haugen asked Ms. Rodarte if an aid car from the city of Auburn was on
the scene. Ms. Rodarte confirmed that the Auburn Fire Department aid car responded
and transported her daughter to the hospital for treatment.
Councilmember Brothers requested verifieation of her daughter's age and day of the
attack. Ms. Rodarte responded her daughter is 15, and was out on a Saturday evening
without her permission. However, she believes her daughter was on a public street with
a friend, minding their own business when they were attacked. Councilmember Brothers
inquired as to what they were doing. Ms. Rodarte's daughter responded they were just
walking around minding their own business and did nothing to provoke an attack. She
confirmed for Councilmember Brothers there were 5 juveniles who attacked her, and she
does know them. The daughter also stated it does not appear as if anyone in authority is
looking for them.
Mayor Booth requested Ms. Rodarte and her daughter speak with Police Chief Purdy.
Ms. Rodarte indieated she's also spoken with the school distriet, but if it took a police
officer to transport her daughter to and from school, she would demand that serviee in
order to keep her daughter safe. Ms. Rodarte added she does not feel it is safe for
adults to be walking the streets in Auburn either.
Councilmember Haugen requested a clarification of the location of the attack. Ms.
Rodarte responded that it is at "F" and 17th Street S.E. near the Church of Latter Day
Saints parking lot.
Councilmember Barber stated she agreed with Ms. Rodarte there was a need for the
Legislature to change juvenile laws. Councilmember Barber believes a curfew law is
needed but she has been advised this type of law would have difficulty being upheld in
the event of a court challenge. She will continue to do her part to express the concerns
of the Auburn citizens on to the Legislature.
Councilmember Brothers asked whether a complaint was filed, and Ms. Rodarte
confirmed she has filed two assault complaints. She further noted for Councilmembers
the attackers have been suspended from school, and they may be transient in their living
arrangements.
Councilmember Haugen stated she supports Councilmember Barber's desire to enact a
curfew law in Auburn.
Councilmember Brothers stated the Auburn City Council does more than most
jurisdictions in authorizing police officer positions. He stated he's concerned with what
happened. Councilmember Brothers stated the young woman certainly did not deserve to
be attacked, but he also noted that streets in any city at 1 :00 a.m. are not appropriate
places for 15-year-ol<;i girls. Ms. Rodarte agreed. She stated that had she known her
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No.4
September 19, 1994
daughter was out she would have taken care of it. However, Ms. Rodarte emphasized
her daughter did not deserve to be attacked. She also indicated that a curfew would
help give her the power to control her daughter. Councilmember Brothers thanked Ms.
Rodarte for coming, and he encouraged her to continue talking with Chief Purdy and
the City Attorney.
Councilmember Borden thanked Ms. Rodarte for coming and stated she will consider
initiating a curfew. But, she believes Ms. Rodarte also needs to become involved with
the Legislature to help change juvenile laws.
Councilmember Haugen also encouraged Ms. Rodarte to continue a dialog with Auburn
School Distriet officials. Ms. Haugen indicated that the city and the distriet were
beginning to work with each other on some issues, and maybe Ms. Rodarte could be part
of this process by sharing her concerns.
Mayor Booth stated he certainly respects Ms. Rodarte's willingness to come before the
Council, and he believes the Council will continue to work with the Legislature and look
for a curfew that's enforceable.
Cindv Caverlv. 135 15th Street S. E.. Auburn
Ms. Caverly stated that one of Ms. Rodarte's daughter's attackers also attacked her
during the month of January, 1994 at around 7:00 p.m. She expressed concern with the
King County Juvenile Prosecutors Offiee in handling her case. She does not believe a
curfew will address the attacks.
Councilmember Brothers expressed his concern that the same perpetrator was assaulting
young women in Auburn. He asked whether Chief Purdy was aware of the specific
individual, and whether all avenues are being approached to this individual. Chief
Purdy responded that the department has concluded its investigation, and the case
remains with King County. Chief Purdy also indieated his department is appropriately
investigating this recent attack.
Councilmember Haugen asked if her attack was in the same area as Ms. Rodarte's
daughter's. Ms. Caverly indicated it was on 17th Street S. E. by Holy Family Church.
Councilmember Haugen asked if this area was of particular concern to the Police
Department. Chief Purdy responded there are many calls for assistance in the area,
many of whieh are domestie-type calls.
Councilmember Brothers asked Chief Purdy to present an update on each of the cases
presented this evening at the next Municipal Serviees Committee.
Councilmember Haugen asked whether any prosecuting attorney updates could be
presented. Mayor Booth responded the cases are handled by the King County office,
and that juvenile records are confidential.
Councilmember Wagner complimented Ms. Rodarte for her presentation.
Councilmember Wagner also stated he could appreciate her concern, and he shared that
his teen-age daughter had been attacked in the same area a few months ago. He stated
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 5
September 19, 1994
he has not been updated by the prosecuting office with regard to his daughter's case.
Councilmember Wagner concurs this area is a concern whieh must be addressed.
Jolene Rodarte. 223 15th St. S.E.. Auburn
Ms. Rodarte stated if the leader of the gang was taken off the street, the problem would
go away. She believes this person has made all residents in the area afraid, including
adults. She also stated she was screaming and no one would respond to her cries for
help because they were afraid.
Acting City Attorney Reynolds explained the difficulty in the juvenile section of the
criminal justice system. He believed when the state decided juvenile cases would be
handled at the county level many years ago, there was no anticipation of the volume of
cases we are experiencing today. He stated this issue needs to addressed at the state
level.
Mike Lobliner. 304 15th St. S. E.. Auburn
Mr. Lobliner stated that residents of the area know the perpetrator, and people are
afraid. He wants more prosecutors hired.
Mayor Booth stated that local authorities are not able to dictate to King County offieials.
But, Auburn officials will do all they can to continue to resolve the issue of juvenile
violence and justice issues.
Councilmember Barber acknowledged local authorities have a responsibility to
communicate with the Legislators, but she urged each constituent to write letters and call
their state Legislature with their concerns. She believes everyone needs to do their share
to change the laws.
Mayor Booth stated he would be willing to personally deliver letters to the legislators.
Councilmember Haugen asked if persons attending this evening's meeting and who have
stated their names and addresses would like to receive Legislative information. She also
stated that she understood how fear can affect all ages. Councilmember Haugen also
obtained an affirmative response from Mr. Lobliner that he would like to see more
police presence in the neighborhood.
Councilmember Borden suggested and stated she would be willing to form a group of
citizens to approach Olympia and present their concerns.
Councilmember Brothers noted the 1995 budget requests are now being reviewed by the
Council. He stated at the next Municipal Services meeting he will be asking the Chief
and the Committee to discuss a proactive approach to this problem in order to develop a
solution.
Mr. Lobliner suggested Councilmembers should visit this neighborhood in casual clothes
at various times to see for themselves what is going on. Councilmember Haugen stated
she would be more than happy to visit any neighborhood in the city at any time day or
night.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No.6
September 19, 1994
Christina Crassrack. 1422 B Street S. E.. Auburn
She recently moved here and she's already had two run-ins with the perpetrator
mentioned this evening. She expressed how afraid she is of him.
An2ela Pa2e. 2901 Auburn Wav South. Auburn
Ms. Page stated she understood the problems expressed here tonight are not unique to
Auburn. But, the juvenile and domestie problems have really increased during the past
five years. She would like to see more information on curfew laws.
Acting City Attorney explained some of the problems with a curfew law revolve around
age discrimination. Ms. Page stated that juveniles under the age of 18 are able to run
the streets, carry weapons and drugs, but they can't vote. She stated violent juvenile
issues must be addressed.
Dorothv Frve. 1420 Auburn Wav South. Auburn
Ms. Frye stated she feels the juvenile point system is a problem, and that first time
offenders should be appropriately incarcerated.
Ms. Frye also wants to beautify the city of Auburn. She presented pictures of the
flowers she has planted. She is asking the city to install a water pipe for the property
where she's planting the flowers. Ms. Frye stated she has planted the flowers and
watered the plants at her own expense. She hauls water to the property, and she
believes the City should provide her with a water pipe.
Councilmember Borden asked if the property was close to Ms. Frye's residence. Ms.
Frye confirmed that it was, and it was near the South Fire Station.
Councilmember Haugen commended Ms. Frye for her beautification efforts. She stated
she would support some water access consideration.
Mayor Booth expressed his appreciation to Cindy and Jolene for speaking up and assured
them the City will do what it can.
Carrev Earl. 537 37th Street S. E.. Auburn
Mr. Earl stated he is a retired Navy investigator. Last Saturday he called the Auburn
Police Department to request to speak to a narcotics officer because of what appeared to
be drug activity occurring in his apartment complex. Mr. Earl stated he worked in law
enforcement in the Navy, so he fully understood that the narcoties officers were not
available. But, he asked the police receptionist to please contact a narcoties officer and
have the officer call him. The receptionist would not agree to this request, and Mr. Earl
is questioning the response. Chief Purdy will investigate, and he then will follow-up
with Mr. Earl.
Dave Watson. 603 37th Street S. E.. Auburn
Mr. Watson stated he was before the Council to defend his citizen rights and to state an
appeal with regard to easement negotiations for his property. Mr. Watson relayed the
history of the property. He stated when the mobile home park project was begun in
1979 and necessary water and sewer lines needed to be installed, it was discovered he
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 7
September 19, 1994
owned half the pavement in front of his home. Mr. Watson did not want to pay taxes
on this portion of his property, so he signed a quit claim deed to the city. Mr. Watson
stated the City asked for an easement, but since he had just completed his yard
landscaping, he did not want to grant an easement. Mr. Watson noted he had rejected
the first agreement because an easement had been included. He also stated during the
utility construction project, extensive damage was done to his property.
Approximately two years ago, a local improvement distriet process for his property area
began, and he attended all the meetings. Mr. Watson informed the Council that he
advised City staff during some of these meetings that his property did not have an
easement, and possibly other properties in the area also did not have easements. It was
Mr. Watson's understanding that Jack Locke, Engineering Division, for the City of
Auburn had researched the easement concerns.
Mr. Watson said he met with City staff during January or February of this year in an
attempt to resolve his easement concern. Mr. Watson was referred to Bill Baumgrass of
the Engineering staff after it appeared the prints did not reflect a lack of easement to
his property. Mr. Baumgrass indicated the City may have to claim a portion of Mr.
Watson's property by adverse possession. Some time later, Puget Power and the City
needed to meet at Mr. Watson's property because blueprints were not matching up for
curb line markings. Mr. Watson indieated it took approximately two months to receive a
reply to his request asking for resolution to his easement concerns. Mr. Watson received
a letter from Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds indieating the City will make a claim
for adverse possession, and Mr. Watson is disputing that.
Mr. Watson relayed a description of various confrontations this summer with U. S. West
employees who were attempting to bury a communieations vault on his property, with
city surveyors, City Engineer Dennis Dowdy, and with the contractor and city
construction coordinator. Mr. Watson stated he and his attorney met with City staff
about a month ago to negotiate a settlement. Mr. Watson believes that he has made
many efforts to resolve his easement concerns, and he is disappointed in the proposed
action by the City. Mr. Watson also expressed his concerns with the damages done to his
driveway when work was done to the street, and he believes it was done with intent.
Councilmember Borden stated she had voted against the local improvement distriet
project, and what was before the Council this evening was an eminent domain issue with
regard to Mr. Watson's property. She asked Mr. Watson why he believed the City did
not have an easement, and why Mr. Watson believed his property was different than
other property on 37th Street in terms of how it should be treated.
Mr. Watson responded that the mobile home park and the apartment complex projects on
either side of him were not allowed to start unless they met City criteria, which included
easements. Mr. Watson's quit claim deed did not grant an easement, it only gave the
City the street pavement. Councilmember Borden asked Mr. Watson what he wanted
from the City, i.e., is he requesting the local improvement distriet project go around his
property?
Mr. Watson reiterated his concerns of a breakdown in communieations and a fair market
value for his property. Councilmember Borden clarified Mr. Watson was asking for
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No.8
September 19, 1994
payment of the easement and for the City to admit error in not having an easement; Mr.
Watson agreed. Mr. Watson also read a portion of a letter dated September 12, 1994 he
had received from Mike Reynolds indieating the City could not agree to a $12,000
settlement, and City concerns of Mr. Watson's refusal to give right of entry to the City's
contractor, which may cause added construction expense.
Councilmember Kurle asked for confirmation whether or not the City had made a
monetary offer for his property. Mr. Watson indicated that was correct, but a monetary
agreement has not been reached. Councilmember Kurle asked Mr. Watson to please state
what he wanted. Mr. Watson stated he wanted the Councilmembers to see the situation.
Councilmember Kurle indicated it appears both sides are unable to reach agreement and
maybe it will take a higher authority to resolve the concern. Councilmember Kurle
stated his appreciation for Mr. Watson's presentation. Mr. Watson added that there was
very little negotiation, and he stated additional concerns with the local improvement
assessments.
Councilmember Haugen asked whether the City had right of way when water and sewer
construction was done in approximately 1979. Mr. Watson stated he had refused to give
the City any more than just the pavement. Mr. Watson also confirmed for
Councilmember Haugen that his landscape damage had been fixed by the City even
though he was not totally pleased. Councilmember Haugen asked City staff, when did
the City know there was no right of way. Acting City Attorney Reynolds responded
that up until May of this year, the City's position was the right of way was not
necessary because of the adverse possession argument which Mr. Watson enunciated.
Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds explained the confusion over the property
description in the area, and explained the basis for his recommendation to proceed with
a court decision. Acting City Attorney Reynolds also stated he is concerned with Mr.
Watson's statements with regard to his driveway damage. Mr. Reynolds stated the
instructions to the contractor was to provide for adequate ingress/egress for motor
vehicles without high centering. Mr. Reynolds believes the City is proceeding in an
orderly manner. At the moment, there will be no entry to Mr. Watson's property
without court authorization.
Councilmember Haugen again asked how long the City knew it did not have right-of-
way. Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds stated the City believed it had right away up
until about June this year when the property owner placed personal property in front of
the contractor's equipment. Mr. Reynolds further explained a right-of-way, which
adds to a currently used roadway, is determined by whatever is designated as a normal
width within a munieipality, whieh is normally 60-feet. Mr. Reynolds reiterated his
decision to pursue an orderly court process after the confrontation between contractor
and citizen had occurred in June of this year. He noted this action also preserves both
arguments.
Councilmember Haugen asked Director Currie how wide 37th Street S. E. will be upon
completion. Director Currie stated the road is 32-feet plus 8-foot sidewalks, and some
places may be wider for turns. Councilmember Haugen asked about speed limits for
37th Street S. E., and Director Currie responded he thought it may be 30 m.p.h.
Councilmember Haugen also asked for confirmation that there was a monetary offer and
counter-offer concern, and Mayor Booth provided confirmation.
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 9
September 19, 1994
Mr. Watson thanked Mayor Booth and the Council for their time.
Linda Caverlv. 135 15th Street S. E.. Auburn
Ms. Caverly stated her concerns with some Councilmembers asking Mr. Watson what he
wanted. She offered an apology to Mr. Watson for her tax dollars creating a burden and
a problem for him for many years.
Debbie Trott. 220 D Street S.E.. Auburn
Ms. Trott is speaking tonight to share the experience her husband, Steve, and she had a
couple of years ago with regard to remodeling their home, whieh was built in 1913. She
stated because of their time-consuming variance process, she had requested the Planning
staff to consider amending the codes so that citizens who had older homes did not have
to share the same experience. Ms. Trott was pleased to have been invited to attend the
Planning Commission meeting of September 7, 1994 which considered amending the
Zoning Code related to older single-family homes that may have substandard lot size, lot
width or lot depth. She indieated many of the older homes in Auburn are considered
non-conforming lots in the current Zoning Code, and this status makes remodeling
diffieult.
Ms. Trott states she feels Auburn has lost a lot of its architectural heritage because we
have no historical building code. She believes some of the language in the proposed
Zoning Code amendments before the Council this evening would nullify action in
developing a historic preservation code. She's concerned that the amendments deal with
lot size coverage, which was the issue for variance diffieulties with her 1913 home
remodeling project, and does not contain some of the language she believes will benefit
historie homes.
Ms. Trott stated she believes the Zoning Code amendments will not assist persons who
have older garages that sit directly on a property line in an alley and who want to
rebuild a garage on the same spot. She requests the language "grandfathering" be
somewhere in the amendments, and that the amendments are subject to discretionary
interpretation. Ms. Trott requests the text be written for greater understanding of the
requirements to the average citizen
Ms. Trott stated Auburn needs a Historic Preservation Code.
Councilmember Wagner complimented Ms. Trott for remaining concerned and a part of
the process related to older single-family homes in Auburn. Councilmember Wagner
stated the older single-family homes are important to him, too. He believes Senior
Planner Lynn Rued has made a conscientious effort to address the issue.
Councilmember Wagner read Item J of 18.54-3 of the proposed amendments. He stated
this amendment addresses the concern of accessory structures being replaced.
Councilmember Wagner stated this amendment allows persons to rebuild on the same
footprint, and he complimented Mr. Rued for the amendment language.
Senior Planner Lynn Rued stated Councilmember Wagner was correct regarding the
intent of the language. He further indicated that nonconforming is a universal term. It
indieates the existing use was built under regulations whieh are not applicable by today's
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 10
September 19, 1994
standards. He explained if one has a nonconforming building, it can be replaced with
this amendment.
Ms. Trott indieated the amendment doesn't completely resolve her concerns. She
described an older garage with a vehicle entrance off the street, and she questions
whether the setback formulas are resolved under proposed Zoning Code Amendment
Item J.
Councilmember Brothers stated he, too, interprets the amendments as Ms. Trott, and he
knows Councilmember Wagner is an advocate of non-conforming and historieal housing,
but he thought there would be a proposal for historical housing.
Mr. Rued noted in the review with the Planning & Community Development Committee,
discussion was held whether it should be historical preservation or add flexibility to
older homes. It was decided to first address older homes, and then do a more
comprehensive historical code at a later date.
Ms. Trott asked for confirmation that the amendments would not nullify the need for
historical home preservation.
Councilmember Burns stated he was the Chair of the Planning and Community
Development Committee. He believes the records of the Committee will show that the
purpose of the amendment is to allow people to replace their existing structures, even
though they may be in a position of nonconformance. Councilmember Burns believes
the amendments will do what Ms. Trott would like to see done as well as the wishes of
the Council. He also stated he would like to clarify the term "historical preservation".
Councilmember Burns explained "historical preservation" statutes under state and federal
law severely limits the ability to change the property, i.e., one cannot modernize the
property unless it is consistent with the original historical building. Auburn's
amendment will allow older structures in the community to bring their structures up to
modern standards, if they want, and within the consistency of the neighborhood rather
than city standards. Councilmember Burns emphasized the amendment has the effect of
preserving the historical nature of the neighborhood, but doesn't necessarily preserve the
historical character of each and every building. He doesn't believe most residents of
older neighborhoods want to be limited in their remodeling.
Ms. Trott indicated the only reason she was using the term "historical preservation" is
that was the only way they were able to secure their variance. She read portions of a
letter her attorney had sent to her dated May 29, 1992. She also indicated at the
September 7, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, she left with the impression that the
amendment nullified the need to consider historic homes, and that is why she is before
the Council this evening.
Councilmember Haugen asked Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds a hypothetical
question, if an owner of an older building that is being used for storage and sits 18"
from the property line, could the owner tear down and rebuild the building.
Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds responded that they could. He also indieated he
believes the amendment accomplishes what Mr. and Mrs. Trott wanted to accomplish
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 11
September 19, 1994
with the type of project they had. He also noted that Councilmember Burns correctly
summarized the historie preservation statutes. He indieated that some of the buildings
downtown would not be able to be modernized if they were designated under historic
preservation statutes. Acting City Attorney Reynolds feels the amendment actually
encourages preservation of existing structures in town and allows the type of remodeling
done by Mr. and Mrs. Trott as well as some of the downtown business remodels.
Ms. Trott stated she would like to see the City encourage their citizens in their older
neighborhoods to value those older neighborhoods, to see them as playing a part in
Auburn's history, and to not let them run down, but to see them as something special.
Councilmember Kurle expressed interest in some of the rooms remodeled in Mr. and
Mrs. Trott's home since their home was his boyhood home. Councilmember Kurle was
pleased.
Councilmember Haugen stated she was pleased with the amendment, and she thanks the
Trotts for their help in amending this code.
Mayor Booth thanked Mr. and Mrs. Trott and called for a five-minute recess at 9:40
p.m.
Mayor Booth reconvened the Council meeting at 9:50 pm.
Preston Minor. 537 37th Street S.E.. Auburn
Mr. Minor said he had overheard his parents stating the Fire Department was using
money to get computers instead of fire equipment, and he is concerned. Chief Johnson
explained that he is requesting some money for the 1995 budget be for computers. Mr.
Minor stated he wanted the Fire Department to have equipment to fight two-story
building fires rather than computers. Chief Johnson invited Mr. Minor to visit the Fire
Station, meet with the firefighters, and see the emergency equipment. Chief Johnson
assured Mr. Minor that emergency equipment could accommodate two-story buildings.
Mayor Booth thank Mr. Minor for attending the Council meeting this evening.
Councilmembers Brothers and Haugen complimented Preston's parents and congratulated
Preston for his skill in public speaking.
Brian Jones. 537 37th Street S. E.. Auburn
Mr. Jones expressed concern the new school construction on 37th Street S. E. has not
been completed, and construction debris continues to present a parking problem for
apartment residents. Mr. Jones indieated he has experienced a Fire Marshal asking him
to move his parked vehiele from an unmarked fire line. Chief Johnson responded the
Fire Department will make a visit to the complex and make sure fire lanes are properly
marked.
Mr. Jones also asked what was an adequate response time for police officers in Auburn.
Chief Purdy indicated a response time depended upon the four different types of call
classification; for instance, a loss of life situation may average 3-minutes. Mr. Jones
indicated residents in his apartment complex had numerous occasions to call for help and
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 12
September 19, 1994
the response time was 45-minutes. Chief Purdy inquired if Mr. Jones knew the nature
of the call, and Mr. Jones stated domestie violence, loud music, and traffic concerns.
Mr. Jones then questioned Chief Purdy on shift schedules and the police vehicle fleet,
which Chief Purdy answered.
Councilmember Haugen directed her comments to Chief Johnson. She stated she shares
concerns for the 37th Street S. E. apartment dwellers regarding parking problems, and
debris could present a problem for the Fire Department in the event of a fire.
Councilmember Brothers agreed construction debris should be removed from parking
spaces, but he also understands the construction is a temporary situation.
Councilmember Haugen noted she is concerned because of the work stoppage situation.
Public Works Director stated there were a number of items not completed on the project,
and he will have appropriate staff look into the situation.
Mr. Jones ended his comments with a statement of opposition that the speed limit would
be raised on 37th Street S.E. He understands that the street will be posted at 35 m.p.h.,
and he does not feel that is appropriate for an area that has so many young children.
Sue Minor. 537 37th Street S. E.. Auburn
Ms. Minor stated her apartment complex is losing parking stalls due to the sidewalks and
curbing.
Public Works Director Frank Currie responded he would have staff investigate.
Councilmember Haugen stated to Director Currie she is very concerned about the
construction impacts to the apartment dwellers, and she would like to see a report from
Director Currie with the results of his investigation.
There were no further requests for audience partieipation.
C. Corresoondence
There were no correspondence agenda items.
III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. MuniciDal Services
A3.6.4.4
Chair Brothers reported the Municipal Services Committee met this evening at 4:30 p.m.
Chair Brothers noted the Committee heard an update to concerns on 0 Street N.E., and
he was pleased to report the concerns are under control. The Committee reviewed
proposed 1995 budgets for Police and Fire Departments. The next Municipal Services
meeting will be Monday, October 3, 1994 at 4:30 p.m.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 13
September 19, 1994
B. Plannin2 & Communitv Develooment
A3.6.4.4
Chair Burns reported the Planning and Community Development Committee met on
Monday, September 12, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. and the minutes are of public record. Chair
Burns requests Council support of his Committee's items found on this evening's agenda.
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Community Development
Committee will be held on September 26, 1994 at 7:30 p.m.
C. Public Works
A3.6.4.4
Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee met on September 8, 1994 at 5:30
p.m. and discussed the proposal on the supermall contract and requested support of the
Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor Passenger Service Objectives. The next meeting of the
Public Works Committee is scheduled for Monday, September 26, 1994 at 5:30 p.m.
D. Finance
A.3.6.4.4
Chair Barber reported the Finance Committee met today at 7:00 p.m. and discussed
Ordinance Nos. 4701 and 4702, Resolution No. 2557 and claims and payroll vouchers.
The next meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled for Monday, October 3, 1994
at 7:00 p.m.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes
1. Minutes of the September 6, 1994 regular Council meeting.
B. Vouchers
F4.9.2, F4.9.5
1. Claim numbers 95212 through 95573 in the amount of $2,234,463.99 and dated
September 19, 1994.
2. Payroll numbers 208051 through 208596 in the amount of $846,732.26 covering
the period 9/2/94 to 9/9/94.
C. Utilitv Bill Ad iustment
F4.5.2
Recommend approval of utility adjustments to accounts No. 1.43.1170 in the amount of
$6,076.02, No. 4.19.0210 in the amount of $7,419.95, and No. 3.61.1290 in the amount of
$380.97.
D. Call to Advertise
A2.5.6
Request City Council authorization to advertise a request for proposal for telephone
system upgrade.
Motion by Councilmember Kurle, second by Councilmember Burns, to approve Consent
Agenda Items IV.A-C plus Item D as presented under agenda modifications.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 14
September 19, 1994
Councilmember Wagner requested an explanation on the agenda bill which requests
Council approval to advertise for a telephone system upgrade. Acting City Attorney
responded that the agenda bill contains a typographical error, and that the telephone
system upgrade will go out as a request for proposal since it is considered for
professional serviees.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Aoolication No. MIS0013-94ZC
03.4.2.1.2
Council consideration to amend the Zoning Code related to older single-family homes that
may have substandard lot size, lot width or lot depth and to signs and to day care.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden, to approve the
proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and to instruct the City Attorney to
prepare the necessary ordinance.
Councilmember Brothers asked why lot sizes, signs, and day care amendments were
grouped together, i.e., was there any correlation among these amendment items to each
other. Senior Planner Lynn Rued responded it was more efficient to conduct one public
hearing for multiple zoning code amendments, and he noted the public hearing has been
conducted. The day care amendment brings the Auburn Code into compliance with state
law. The Auburn Code limits day care residential homes to six children and the state law
now allows 12.
Councilmember Kurle inquired whether Auburn Codes could be more restrictive than
state law. Mr. Rued responded the City would not have the right to limit residential day
cares to less than 12. Councilmember Kurle asked if the City Council would receive
updated Zoning Code copies, and Mr. Rued responded with an affirmative.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
B. Ordinance No. 4649
03.8 REZ0009-90
The request of Supermall representatives to waive Condition #8.k.3 of Ordinance No.
4649 to allow 10 Foot width of landscaping prior to occupancy of the remainder of
Phase I of the SuperMall.
Councilmember Burns requested clarification on language contained on the agenda
modifications with regard to Ordinance No. 4649. Mr. Rued responded that in the agenda
packet contains language "8.k.3 and 4" and condition 4 does not need to be changed. The
agenda modification is indicating only review of 8.k.3.
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 15
September 19, 1994
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to amend Ordinance
No. 4649 as presented under agenda modifieations.
Councilmember Haugen expressed concern that the waiver might affect persons who
might use the urban trail. Planning Director Krauss explained that the Supermall will
perform on all their conditions, but not by the opening of the Incredible Universe. Mr.
Krauss does not believe there will be a problem with the urban trail since there is no
active construction in the trail area.
Councilmember Brothers requested a summary on the reduction in landscape width in
condition #8.k.3. Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds explained the width does not
change, it's the date of construction which is delayed.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Ordinances
Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds read the title to each ordinance.
1. Ordinance No. 4700
03.10.1 CUP0003-94
An Ordinance of the city of Auburn, Washington, providing for a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a five unit multi-family development on
property zoned R-3 (Duplex) located at 4021 Auburn Way South, within the city
of Auburn.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Haugen, to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4700.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
2. Ordinance No. 4701
A3.13.4
Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds noted Ordinance No. 4701 is the ordinance
that Mr. Watson commented on during audience partieipation.
An Ordinance of the city of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the acquisition of
certain property and property rights by eminent domain providing for the
payment thereof; authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for
condemnation in the superior court in and for the county of King and for the
prosecution thereof of the acquisition of such property and property rights for
roadway purpose (right-of-way on 37th Street S.E., (A Street-M Street) Street
Improvement No. 277).
Councilmember Barber stated she appreciated Mr. Watson's concerns and she
believes the only fair solution is to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4701.
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 16
September 19, 1994
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by Councilmember Brothers, to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4701.
MOTION CARRIED. 6-1 with Councilmember Haugen voting no.
3. Ordinance No. 4702
03.13.4
An Ordinance of the city of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the acquisition of
certain property and property rights by eminent domain providing for the
payment thereof; authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for
condemnation in the superior court in and for the county of King and for the
prosecution thereof for the acquisition of such property and property rights for
roadway purposes (right-of-way and easements) on Auburn Way North (4th
Street-15th Street) Street Improvement No. 288).
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by Councilmember Brothers, to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4702.
Councilmember Haugen requested a landmark be identified so she could
determine the location. Acting City Attorney noted it is just past 4th Street N.
E., near the Buds & Blooms location on the west side of the road, and on the east
side of the road, the parking lot near the Back Porch.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-1 with Councilmember Haugen voting
no.
B. Resolutions
Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds read the titles to each resolution out loud.
1. Resolution No. 2553
A1.7
A Resolution of the City Council of the city of Auburn, Washington, expressing
support for the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor Passenger Serviee Objectives.
Motion by Councilmember Wagner, second by Councilmember Kurle to adopt
Resolution No. 2553.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
2. Resolution No. 2554
04.9.1 PR 522, A5.2.5
A Resolution of the City Council of the city of Auburn, Washington, authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an agreement for artwork with Garth
Edwards to provide artwork located at the downtown pedestrian plaza.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Barber, to introduce
and adopt Resolution No. 2554.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 17
September 19, 1994
Councilmember Wagner stated he is supportive of art projects within the city,
but he does not feel he can support this art project. He indicated the investment
by the City through General Fund and Enterprise Funds as well as Federal Grant
monies is substantial for the Downtown Pedestrian Plaza. Councilmember
Wagner noted this project has reached the maximum financial support he can
support and does not feel comfortable incorporating the art costs into this
project.
Councilmember Brothers concurs with Councilmember Wagner's thoughts on the
project. Councilmember Brothers noted this project would be a tremendous
enhancement to the downtown area even without the art. He believes he would
be able to support art at a later date, but with the budget constraints for this
project, he does not believe this expenditure is in the best interests of the City.
Councilmember Haugen stated she concurs with Council members Brothers and
Wagner. She believes, too, it is an added expense.
Councilmember Borden stated it was her understanding that $30,000 came out of
the Arts Commission budget. She further noted the City had entrusted members
of the Arts Commission to make recommendations for public art.
Mayor Booth requested Parks & Recreation Director Len Chapman to say a few
words.
Director Chapman confirmed there is $30,000 in the General Fund Arts
Commission budget. He noted some of the Arts Commission members are in the
audience this evening, and he believed they would be able to answer some of the
Council's questions as to why they chose this project. Director Chapman stated
placing the art in the Downtown Pedestrian Mall makes sense because the project
is underway and becomes an integral part of the Mall. Some of the essential
parts of the Pedestrian Mall, such as the bollards and tree grates, have become
part of the art project. The bollards and tree grates are still necessary items in
the construction of the Pedestrian Mall. These necessary items are paid for
through the construction fund and not the arts budget. The art project includes
a story pole, tree guards which symbolize people standing on either side of the
trees, and a kiosk whieh would advertise activities within the city of Auburn.
Councilmember Barber stated she wants to be proud of downtown Auburn and
she believes the art project will contribute to all citizens as well as the downtown
core when the Supermall is completed. She also stated a lot of thought had gone
into this project to tie it in to Auburn. She stated the money is budgeted for art,
and she would like to see this project go forward.
Councilmember Burns commented he understands the fiscal concerns for this
project, but he believes it is necessary to keep in mind that this project is being
built in the community's center core. The City's parades, street fairs, and lots of
community activities occur in downtown. While the project has many utilitarian
aspects, there is also an aesthetic value to be considered. Councilmember Burns
believes we should take the opportunity to add a considerable aesthetic
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 18
September 19, 1994
improvement to the core area of our community as we have done with the
Centennial Mural on the side of Wagner Hobby Shop, the landscaping and B
Street Project.
Councilmember Haugen requested clarification on figures of the project. She
reviewed the information before her indicating $30,000 came from the Arts
Commission budget, but she also notes an extra $26,000 into this item. She
stated she loves art, but she believes the City needs additional police officers and
firefighters. Councilmember Haugen stated she cannot support an additional
$26,000 for the arts project.
Councilmember Brothers stated he agreed with Councilmember Haugen.
Councilmember Borden noted that the Downtown Pedestrian Mall Project needs
tree grates and bollards for $26,000, only they won't look as nice without the
artwork. She believes a lot of money has been spent on this project, and we
have an opportunity to make the project look good rather than okay for a little
more money.
Councilmember Brothers suggested that there was nothing more attractive than a
tree, and a tree didn't need to be dressed up with associated art.
Councilmember Haugen stated she does not believe we need to spend $26,000
right now.
Councilmember Borden asked for Councilmember Haugen to clarify whether her
statement means agreement to spend $30,000.
Councilmember Haugen said it was her understanding $30,000 is already
appropriated for art projects, and she believes it is okay to spend it. She noted
$9,200 will be charged to the Main Street Improvement budget.
Director Chapman noted the fabrication of the bollards and tree grates will have
to be done whether or not there is Council approval for the arts project.
Bollards along B Street are necessary to keep vehicles off the sidewalk, and the
tree grates are necessary for the opening for the trees in the sidewalk. The tree
grate pattern is for a mold that will be used for future tree grates.
Councilmember Wagner noted this was a budget issue and not an art issue. He is
concerned about spending more on the functional improvements than had been
originally budgeted. He asked Public Works Director Currie for an estimate on
what the grant expectations were. Director Currie noted the department was
under a short time frame to respond to the enhancement project, and he briefly
explained the grant formulas. Councilmember Wagner further stated he believes
we have done enough financially for the core area right now.
Councilmember Haugen asked Director Currie why the scope of this project has
changed. Director Currie stated the intent of what we wanted to do remained
the same, but what was submitted on the grant was underestimated, whieh results
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 19
September 19, 1994
in higher cost. Councilmember Haugen inquired whether the plans got bigger
after application of the grant. Director Currie explained the project became
more detailed and became more costly.
Mayor Booth recognized Arts Commission Member Lynn Norman.
Lvnn Norman. 120 East Main Street. Auburn
Ms. Norman explained she is also a part of a sub-committee of the Arts
Commission known as Art in Public Places. She explained the sub-committee
meets to determine possible sites within the city for artwork. The
recommendation for the Downtown Pedestrian Mall art proposal was made
because construction was underway and the art project would be much higher if
done after construction of the Downtown Pedestrian Mall. She feels the artwork
enhances the whole city, not just downtown. She believes that construction
improvements are different than public art appropriations. She feels that the
impact of art is essential to the city, and that this particular artwork is a golden
opportunity.
Councilmember Barber expressed her feeling that what is before the Council is
approval for artwork, not additional construction costs. The agreement is for
artwork to go into a current construction project. She believes by trying to save
$30,000, the Downtown Pedestrian Mall finished product may result in being
mediocre.
Councilmember Kurle doesn't feel the Downtown Pedestrian Mall is a mediocre
project and that all the Council is considering is $30,000 from the General Fund.
He appreciates Councilmember Wagner's expression of fiscal concerns.
Councilmember Kurle does not feel the appropriation should go back into the
General Fund; he believes the appropriated art funds should be spent.
Councilmember Wagner questioned Director Currie on what was expected to be
spent on the project. Director Currie explained the grant had to be submitted
with speed because of the short time frame to submit the grant application.
Director Currie noted the variety of formulas available in matching grants, and if
the scope of the project changes, as this particular project did, the grant remains
the same. Councilmember Wagner noted this explanation confirmed his opinion
that the Council expected to invest $100,000 in General Fund monies in
downtown, we are now investing $300,000, and the Council is now being asked
to add another $58,000 to the project. He believes it is time to halt the expenses.
Councilmember Wagner added a concern that we should be looking at other sites
within the city, such as the new high school or Supermall, as he feels the
investment in downtown is substantial.
Councilmember Barber respectfully disagrees with the suggestion of placing city
art at a school location, and she believes the plans for the Supermall are lovely.
She reiterated her belief that the $30,000 has been budgeted, and she would like
to see it spent on this project.
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 20
September 19, 1994
Councilmember Haugen doesn't feel the Council is being asked to return $30,000
to the General Fund. She reminded Councilmembers to keep in mind there is a
concern of some businesses within the core area of Auburn being asked to
participate in an Association, and she's concerned about the amount of money
being spent for the artwork.
Mayor Booth called on Lynn Norman to address the Council.
Ms. Norman noted there is a sculpture near the new high school which was
placed last year, and that the Arts Commission attempts to place art in various
sites within the city. She further noted it has been several years since a major
piece of artwork has placed, and she feels this piece will draw people from all
over the city to view it.
Councilmember Wagner questioned when the Mural on the hobby store wall was
done. Ms. Norman confirmed the Mural was an Arts Commission project, and it
was done in 1989 as part of a grant from the King County Centennial
Commission.
Councilmember Borden noted that it makes sense to put art in places where the
most people will see it, and she can't think of a better place than downtown for
the people of Auburn to enjoy.
Mayor Booth called on Auburn Arts Commissioner Dr. Herman Ansingh to
speak.
Dr. Herman Ansin2h. 909 5th N. E.. Auburn
Dr. Ansingh stated this artwork was truly a golden opportunity to use
appropriated monies, and he also pointed out it took nine months for the artwork
plan. He doesn't believe there are any regrets for the statue placed at City Hall,
Viewpoint Park, or Roegner Park.
Councilmember Brothers stated that $30,000 was budgeted for 1994, but he is
asking if the Council is being asked for another $28,000. Director Chapman
explained $30,000 is budgeted and the $28,000 will go for required construction
elements. The tree grates and bollards are built into the construction costs of the
Downtown Pedestrian Mall. The $9,200 is for the molds for the tree grates, and
this amount does not come out of the $30,000 art project.
Councilmember Haugen reminded her colleagues that the City has recently
acquired Olson Canyon and there are other parks which might be considered for
artwork.
Mayor Booth recognized Art Commissioner Paul Dodsworth.
Paul Dodsworth. 20 I Street N. E.. Auburn
He is the chair of the Art in Public Places sub-committee.
committee met many times to determine ideas for art that may
and cost effective. He stated members take their volunteer
He noted the
be appropriate
positions very
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 21
September 19, 1994
seriously, and the members are concerned how Auburn looks, including the
entrances, signs, etc. He noted if the Arts Commission $30,000 appropriation is
not spent this year, it is returned to the General Fund. The art projects are
recommended on a yearly basis.
Councilmember Haugen stated she is considering this project seriously, and she
does support the expenditure of $30,000; it is the additional $26,000 which is her
concern.
Councilmember Wagner thanked the Arts Commission for their great work. He
still is concerned with the fiscal investment being made in downtown. He noted
the recent Burlington Northern Bridge project is considered an entrance into
downtown, and that the Bridge was built with hangers to accept art at a future
date. In his view, this is another investment in art in the downtown area in
addition to the Mural and City Hall sculpture. He believes it is time to place
artwork somewhere else. He suggested if the 1994 funds could not be spent this
year, the Council should consider appropriating $60,000 for next year.
Councilmember Wagner reiterated his concern is the amount of money being
spent on this downtown project.
Councilmember Brothers stated he believes all members of the Council appreciate
the efforts of the Arts Commission on behalf of the city. He values the Arts
Commission serviee, but realistieally, the Council must consider the needs of 15-
year-old girls who are being beaten. He feels $30,000 will help with the cost of
a police offieer. Councilmember Brothers stated he wasn't voting against the
Arts Commission, but rather is in a position of making tough budgetary
decisions. He feels when the City is in a better position to invest in public art,
the Council will act accordingly. He also feels the City has invested an enormous
amount of money for the downtown area the past 8 years.
Councilmember Borden appreciated Councilmember Brothers concerns. She does
not believe $30,000 will support a police officer for very long.
Councilmember Burns stated that the art request is approximately less than 5% of
the cost of the project and probably less than 1 % of the General Fund budget.
This appropriation is not a long-time commitment, such as a computer position
which would cost $50,000 per year. Councilmember Burns stated this is a one-
time expense that will have a long-term benefieial interest on the downtown
community. He hears an inference that downtown might mean downtown
businesses. He believes downtown is the center of our community for all
citizens. Councilmember Burns has seen the drawings for the art and it looked
wonderful. He believes the artwork has been debated this evening, and he
respectfully asks the Mayor to call for a vote since there is a motion on the floor.
Mayor Booth called for the vote.
MOTION CARRIED 4-3. Mayor Booth called for a show of hands.
Councilmembers voting yes were: Burns, Borden Barber and Kurle.
Councilmembers voting no were: Haugen, Brothers, and Wagner.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 22
September 19, 1994
3. Resolution No. 2555
05.1
A Resolution of the city of Auburn, Washington, setting forth policy
considerations and procedures relating to the naming of public park property and
facilities.
Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Haugen to introduce
and adopt Resolution No. 2555.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
4. Resolution No. 2557
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing
the Finance Director to make declaration of official intent on behalf of the City
of Auburn as may be necessary or appropriate from time to time for any purpose
under, and in compliance with, the requirements of the Federal Reimbursement
regulations.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by Councilmember Brothers to
introduce and adopt Resolution No. 2557.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
VIII. MA YOR'S REPORT
Mayor Booth noted that portions of Auburn Way South would be closed for the replacement of
the old railroad bridge beginning October 3, 1994 until November 3, 1994.
Mayor Booth also requested Councilmembers to advise administration as soon as possible to
budget goals and objectives for 1995. Councilmember Brothers indieated he had received the
information last Friday and he needed a few more days to review before he could submit his
recommendations. Councilmember Kurle indieated he thought the top ten goal items discussed
two weeks ago could be confirmed. Councilmember Burns asked if the Finance Committee had
reviewed the information. Councilmember Borden noted they had discussed the process.
Finance Director noted the budget time line was October 25, 1994. Councilmember Burns
would like to suggest a Finance Committee meeting review the material. It was the consensus
of the Council to have a goal/budget presentation at the next Finance Committee meeting.
Executive Session
A1.3.3.2
Mayor Booth announced there would be a 30-minute Executive Session to discuss matters of
personnel. The City Council meeting was recessed to Executive Session at 11:00 p.m. The City
Council meeting was reconvened at 11:25 p.m.
A UBURN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page No. 23
September 19, 1994
IX. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, it was the consensus of the Council
to adjourn the meeting at 11:25 p.m.
~~ Q, -~cX-i-R
Charles A. Booth, Mayor
~
94M9-19