Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-21-1995 CITY OF AUBURN COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1995 7:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Fla.q Salute Mayor Booth called the meeting to order at 7:35 attendance in the pledge of allegiance. p.m. and led those in Roll Call Those in attendance included Mayor Booth and members of the Auburn City Council as follows: Pat Burns, Rich Wagner, Virginia Haugen, Trish Borden, Jeanne Barber, and Stacey Brothers. Councilmember Don Kurle was excused. Staff members present included Police Chief Dave Purdy, Fire Chief Bob Johnson, Personnel Director Brenda Kennedy, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director Dick Deal, Public Works Director Frank Currie, Finance Director Victor Thompson, Senior Planner Lynn Rued, Personnel Analyst Dan Watts, Acting City Attorney Mike Reynolds, City Clerk Robin Wohlhueter, and Deputy City Clerk Dani Daskam. Announcements and Appointments 1. Announcement Six-Year Bus Transit Plan Diane Harper, Transit Planner for Metropolitan King County, made a brief presentation with regard to the Six-Year Bus Transit Plan. Ms. Harper presented the following three questions to the City Council regarding transit service in South King County: how well do proposed service improvements address the needs and concerns of your community; how much City of Aubum Council Meeting Minutes February 21, 1995 change are current customers willing to accept; and what elements of these alternatives would you recommend we include in the proposed plan? Ms. Harper explained Metro is required to have a Six Year Plan regardless of whether or not the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) vote is affirmative. Ms. Harper stated Metro is seeking guidance from elected officials, employer networks, and a selected citizen advisory group on two alternatives which Metro has developed for service for the next six years. Ms. Harper stated Metro will be prepared to come back in April with a proposed bus transit service plan that includes other kinds of services that either integrates with the RTA or goes ahead on its own. Ms. Harper distributed copies of a report entitled "Report on Six Year Plan and Service Alternatives, South King County Subarea" to the City Council. Ms. Harper stated Metro is asking for the City Council's advice on which alternative to plan bus service around for the next six years. Ms. Harper explained the advice of City Council will be taken to SCATBD which is the South County Area Transportation Board for a vote on February 28, 1995. Ms. Harper stated Metro research revealed that more employment is occurring in South King County and people want more flexibility in their local services as well as more services directed toward South King County employment destinations. Ms. Harper explained they have two overall objectives for the next six years: to increase the variety of access to South King County destinations and to increase the market share in some selected South King County markets as opposed to Metro's traditional focus on Seattle. Ms. Harper highlighted Page 8 of the report titled Innovative Products Ideas (for) Commuter Market which describes other forms of bus service in addition to the fixed route transit which 90% of Metro's resources is devoted to. The other forms of service include shuttle, circulator, vanpools, custom bus, additional work on carpools and other forms of services that will be more flexible for the commuters in South King County. Ms. Harper reviewed Page 9 of the report titled Innovative Product Ideas - Local Mobility. This portion of the report describes services such as Dial-a-ride (DART) and other local Page 2 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes February 21, 1995 mobility options which will be available with the adoption of the Six Year Plan. Ms. Harper explained no new taxes will be required to fund these services and explained the financial resources for funding the services. Ms. Harper stated King County Executive Locke has proposed moving current tax revenues in the amount of $20 million from capital to services which will be distributed according to projected populations in the year 2000. According to the population projections, South King County will receive 36% of the new services. Ms. Harper stated further funding will come from the consolidation of underutilized portions of today's system. This means bus trips which are not full will be consolidated. She also stated funding for services will come from partnerships with local jurisdictions and employers much like the partnership Metro has with the City of Auburn for funding a portion of the DART service in Auburn. Ms. Harper stated if the RTA passes, then new resources over the next six years will be commuter rail and regional bus. Ms. Harper explained the South King County Subarea has two alternatives, baseline and multicenter. The major difference between the two is that baseline is very much like today's service and has very minimal changes, while multicenter includes significant changes to the existing customers, increases in north-south and east-west major services, consolidation of peak services, and involves the concept of transferring from local neighborhood service to peak hour trips to Seattle. Ms. Harper stated the cost for baseline services is $49.7 million and the cost for multicenter is $48.4 million. Ms. Harper explained the cost amounts are differenct because the multicenter alternative includes funding on vanpools and other services which are not computed by adding hours of service on the road. The other difference is in hours--multicenter includes 836,000 hours while baseline includes 818,000 hours. Ms. Harper noted the difference in the funding and hours is attributed to different types of services and their cost differential. Ms. Harper noted that under the existing system, 71% of the hours are in routes destined for Seattle while the baseline alternative provides for 61% of the hours in routes destined for Seattle and under the multicenter alternative 36% of the hours Page 3 City of Aubum Council Meetinq Minutes February 21, 1995 are in routes destined for Seattle. Ms. Harper also pointed out that under the existing system 18% of the hours are in intercommunity and local routes while the baseline alternative provides for 28% of the hours in intercommunity and local routes and the multicenter alternative provides for 56% of the hours in intercommunity and local routes. Ms. Harper displayed the Baseline Alternative map from the report which includes today's services with an increase in service between Green River Community College and Federal Way to every half hour, increases in some of the north-south routes, and a little extra in local DART service areas. Under the multicenter alternative under peak hours there are only three routes going up Interstate 5, route 152 does not go out to Enumclaw, a route from Boeing through industrial Kent and into Renton is added, and an Auburn to Kent and Sea-Tac route is added. Ms. Harper stated Metro believes the multicenter alternative better suits the needs of the community; however, current customers would prefer the baseline alternative. Councilmember Brothers asked how Metro plans to make the multicenter approach more appealing than the baseline alternative. Ms. Harper stated as Metro offers more convenient local trips and provides transfer stations that are secure and convenient, hopefully the ridership will increase. Councilmember Brothers stated that from his experience in riding Metro, the service is less than satisfactory. Councilmember Brothers stated his bus stop was not covered and there were no services nearby. Ms. Harper stated Metro realizes it needs to upgrade its facilities. Councilmember Haugen stated she agrees with Councilmember Brothers' statements, and added the service needs to be more comfortable and the drivers more flexible to their riders. Ms. Harper suggested the comments regarding customer appeal should be included in the City of Auburn's recommendation to SCATBD. Councilmember Burns stated the multicenter plan is appealing and would fit in the Auburn community well. Councilmember Burns asked if the anticipated changes in services would also make it easier for commuters in the south end to travel to the Page 4 City of Aubum Council Meetinq Minutes February 21, 1995 bo east side area, such as to Bellevue and Kirkland. Ms. Harper stated commuters would have to travel to either Renton or Tukwila and transfer. Ms. Harper stated only 7% of the total south commuter market goes to the east side while 50% of the commuter market stays in the south. Ms. Harper thanked the City Council for their questions and comments, and stated she looked forward to hearing from the City of Auburn through the SCATBD process. Re!:lional Transit Authority Mr. Freeman, Planning and Communication Director from the Regional Transit Authority (RTA), made a brief presentation and slide show on RTA's overall proposal on the Commuter Rail and Bus Plan. Mr. Freeman distributed brochures on the Regional Transit System Phase I Proposal to be voted on by Puget Sound area voters March 14, 1995. Mr. Freeman explained the Regional Transit Authority is the authority established by the State of Washington to develop a rail plan for the three county regions of Snohomish, King and Pierce Counties. The Board of the RTA and the County Councils of the three counties adopted the Phase I proposal which will be voted on by the voters March 14. Mr. Freeman explained the Phase I Proposal consists of three different modes of commuter rail which will operate from Lakewood (south of Tacoma) to Everett on the present freight railroad network. The proposal includes upgrading the present railroad, improving the signals, and improving the track in order to maintain a high rate of speed. The proposal also includes light rail from Tacoma to Lynnwood and regional trunk bus. Mr. Freeman explained an alternative transportation system is needed to accommodate the projected population growth and traffic congestion. Mr. Freeman stated the Phase 1 Proposal will take approximately 16 years to construct and the Master Plan includes future phases. Mr. Freeman stated the RTA is considering a single fare system where the commuter would pay the applicable fare before boarding and not be required to pay again when crossing county lines. Mr. Freeman stated the RTA has a demonstration commuter train operating between Tacoma and Seattle for the next two weeks. Mr. Freeman stated when the system is operating, it will Page 5 City of Auburn Council Meetinq Minutes February 21, 1995 operate 24 hours a day, every 60 minutes during the base period and every 30 minutes during the peak period with a capacity of 6,000 people during peak hours. Mr. Freeman displayed several slides depicting types of trains operating in Boston, South Florida, and Toronto. Mr. Freeman stated the demonstration cars are similar to the ones operating in South Florida and are the type the RTA plans to operate. Mr. Freeman stated tickets for the transit will be purchased from self-service vending machines on the honor system. The self- service fare system will enable the RTA to effectively operate with a two-person crew. Mr. Freeman explained the light rail system is a 60 mile system from Tacoma consisting of three corridors. The north corridor goes via Capitol Hill and the tunnel and into the University District. The south corridor goes through the Rainier Valley to Sea-Tac Airport, Federal Way and into Tacoma. The east corridor goes across the 1-90 bridge into Bellevue and Overlake. The system can carry between 6,000 and 11,000 people per hour per direction. Mr. Freeman displayed several slides depicting the various light rail systems and their environs in the cities of Sacramento, California; Hamburg, Germany; Portland, Oregon; San Jose, California; Los Angeles-Long Beach, California; San Diego,California, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania; Calgary, Canada; and San Francisco, California. Mr. Freeman stated a bus system that complements the rail system is important to the rail system's success. The rail system will allow utilization of the bus system more efficiently and effectively, allow it to carry large amounts of people in a short time, and provide many more options for transporting commuters to their destinations. Mr. Freeman stated the budget for the Phase I project is $6.7 billion financed by 0.4% sales tax and 0.3% motor vehicle excise tax together with anticipated federal and state contributions totalling $2 billion. Councilmember Brothers asked if the Transit Authority has made any projections on fare prices. Mr. Freeman stated no projections have been made as yet as they are still reviewing possible fare structures. Page 6 City of Aubum Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 Councilmember Haugen asked how the fare system will work. Mr. Freeman explained commuters will purchase tickets from a vending machine before boarding. Mr. Freeman stated inspectors will board trains at random to inspect for proof of fare payment. Mr. Freeman said significant fines will be utilized to deter violators of the self-service fare system. Councilmember Barber asked Mr. Freeman how long it will take to have the system in place if the RTA system is approved by voters. Mr. Freeman stated the construction phase is 16 years, however some portions will be up and running long before then. Mr. Freeman estimated the south corridor system should be in place by the year 2000, and the commuter rail system between Lakewood and Everett should be operational in about three years. Mr. Freeman stated the environmental analyses that need to be conducted will take some time. Councilmember Borden asked if the RTA considered elevated light rail. Mr. Freeman stated portions of the light rail will be in tunnels, elevated, and on the surface. In response to a question from Councilmember Haugen, Mr. Freeman stated the stations hopefully will become the focal point for commercial activities and other community activities. 2. Appointments - None. A,qenda Modifications The agenda modification, distributed to Councilmembers prior to the meeting, transmits the minutes of the Planning and Community Development Committee meeting of February 14, 1995. I1. CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE Public Hearin,qs Application Number REZ0003-94 03.8 REZ0003-94 The request of Jimmy Harkey and Dick Brugger, Auburn Youth Resources, to rezone from C-1, Light Commercial zone, to C-3, Heavy Commercial zone, on property 3.61 acres in size and located on east side of Auburn Way North between 37th and 40th Street N.E. in the City of Auburn. Page 7 City of Auburn Council Meetin;i Minutes February 21, 1995 Mayor Booth opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Senior Planner Lynn Rued stated the rezone request is from an existing C-1 light commercial zoning to a C-3 heavy commercial zone. Mr. Rued stated the property has been zoned C-1 for a long time and the property has been vacant for a long time. Mr. Rued stated the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as appropriate for heavy commercial uses. Mr. Rued stated it was not zoned C-3 because of the concern for the multi-family residences east of the property and the fact that C-3 zoning allows for outdoor type activity and outdoor repair. Mr. Rued stated another concern is the number of uses and driveways for the area because of the seven separate lots. Mr. Rued stated the property owners have had a difficult time in marketing and developing the property. Senior Planner Rued stated that after working with the property owner, staff is recommending a type of contract rezone which would limit the amount of access to Auburn Way North to three separate driveways, preclude any outdoor storage or outdoor repair type uses, and require a substantial landscape buffer on the east side of the project to help buffer the multi-family residences to the east. Councilmember Brothers asked what the permitted uses are in a C-3 zone. Senior Planner Rued stated the list contained in the City Code is quite extensive but includes such types of activities as restaurants, automobile repair, dental offices, professional offices, and dry cleaners. Mr. Rued stated that the difference between this C-3 zoning and other C-3 zoning is that all activity would have to occur inside the buildings. Councilmember Haugen asked if a muffler shop could be located in the proposed C-3 zone. Senior Planner Rued stated that all repair and storage would have to be in the building. Councilmember Haugen asked what types of activities are allowed in a C-1 zone. Senior Planner Rued stated primarily everything that is allowed in a C-3 zone with the exception of any business activity that is outside or is automobile related. Councilmember Haugen asked if Auburn Youth Resources owns a portion of the property, and if so, are they using the property at this time. Senior Planner Rued stated Auburn Youth Page 8 City of Auburn Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 Resources owns Lot 8, and they are interested in marketing the property. Councilmember Haugen asked if there are sidewalks adjacent to the property. Senior Planner Rued stated if there are no sidewalks at this time, sidewalks will be required as part of development. Councilmember Borden asked if the conditions placed on this C-3 zone would preclude drive-up banks, drive-up restaurants, emission testing stations and other like businesses. Senior Planner Rued stated the conditions would preclude them. Wendy Belcheff, 4040 "1" Street N.E., Auburn Mrs. Belcheff stated that her experience with a neighboring C-3 zone is that it creates a lot of noise and traffic. Mrs. Belcheff asked which property owners would be required to upgrade the intersections. Senior Planner Rued stated the developers would be required to enter into a Traffic Mitigation Agreement. Mrs. Belcheff stated the intersection at 40th Street N.E. is not very wide, and she is concerned with the increase in traffic in the neighborhood of her residence. Councilmember Haugen stated she has discovered that a very large group of property owners in North Auburn do not intend to construct sidewalks as part of LID 346. Councilmember Haugen stated the property owners have protested the LID, and she understands they will be excluded because they have a majority in their groups. Senior Planner Rued stated City ordinance requires that when a property is developed, the developer is required to construct sidewalks. Councilmember Brothers stated he is familiar with the properties behind the requested rezone. Councilmember Brothers stated the rezone request should not be honored as it may jeopardize the neighborhood east of the proposed rezone. Councilmember Haugen Councilmember Brothers. stated she concurs with Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0. Page 9 City of Aubum Council Meeting Minutes February 21, 1995 Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Borden to approve the rezone based upon the Hearing Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Conditions, and to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary Ordinance. Councilmember Burns spoke in favor of the rezone. Councilmember Bums stated the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that during the Comprehensive Plan process consideration was given to limiting the commercial development along major arterials, and the commercial development would be buffered with multi-family housing and beyond that single-family housing. Councilmember Wagner stated his support of the rezone request for reasons stated by Councilmember Burns. Councilmember Haugen stated there are quite a few empty buildings in Auburn, particularly in the downtown core, that owners cannot sell because they have the wrong zoning. Councilmember Barber expressed her support of the rezone request. Councilmember Borden stated that since the development is along a major arterial, has other C-3 zones abutting most sides, and is conditioned that all business activities be conducted indoors will help buffer the property to the east of the requested rezone. MOTION CARRIED. 4-2. Councilmembers Brothers and Haugen voted no. Bo Audience Participation Mayor Booth invited citizen participation. Semion Pashkovsky, 1630 Knickerbocker Drive, Auburn Mr. Pashkovsky stated he is a new resident of Auburn and has resided in Auburn for about one and one-half years. Mr. Pashkovsky stated the City is charging him $6.50 per month for solid waste collection service which he does not utilize. Mr. Pashkovsky stated it is inconvenient for him to haul his garbage down his long driveway where it can be picked up, and instead he takes his garbage to his business. Mr. Pashkovsky stated Page 10 City of Aubum Council Meeting Minutes February 21,199~_ he has asked the City twice to remove the solid waste charge; and the City's response is that unless he has his water service discontinued, he will continue to be billed for the minimum solid waste collection service. Mr. Pashkovsky asked the City Council what can be done regarding his situation. Mayor Booth stated solid waste collection service charges are required inside the city limits. In response to a question from Councilmember Brothers, Mr. Pashkovsky confirmed he owns the business where he takes his garbage. Councilmember Wagner asked Public Works Director Currie whether Mr. Pashkovsky would be eligible for a hardship exemption. Mr. Currie suggested Mr. Pashkovsky contact either him or Solid Waste Supervisor Dick Sulser to determine if he is eligible for an exemption according to City Code. Tom Antles, 2428 Poplar Street S.E. #B, Auburn Mr. Antles stated he has lived at his address for approximately one and one-half years, and owns a duplex there. Mr. Antles stated Poplar Street S.E. deadends on a cul-de-sac, and the street has no street lights. Mr. Antles stated there have been several disorderly persons congregating near his residence. Mr. Antles stated that this past weekend while he was away, he sustained damage to three of his vehicles. Mr. Antles stated his property borders the Muckleshoot Reservation, and the area near his home has become a natural path to areas on the reservation. Mr. Antles stated he has tried to get the City to put street lights on his street, but has been told it is not feasible. Mr. Antles also suggested putting barriers at the end of the cul- de-sac to prevent people from holding their parties at the end of the cul-de-sac. Councilmember Barber stated she has visited a residence there and has observed some of the activities Mr. Antles describes. Mrs. Antles, 2428 Poplar Street S.E. #B, Auburn Mrs. Antles stated she and her husband have lost neighbors and renters because they are afraid. Mrs. Antles stated the kids that frequent the area disrupt the neighborhood by yelling and throwing things. Mrs. Antles stated once the police show up the kids disappear, but they come back as soon as the police leave. Page11 City of Aubum Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 o Councilmember Burns suggested Mr. and Mrs. Antles look into forming a Block Watch Program in their neighborhood and contact the Police Department for further information. Mr. Antles stated they have been working on forming a Block Watch Program, but with renters it has been difficult. Mayor Booth urged Mr. Antles to contact Public Works Director Currie regarding the street lighting. Councilmember Haugen asked Police Chief Purdy if there has been a lot of cells for police assistance in the area. Chief Purdy stated he did not have the history available. Mrs. Antles stated there are three vacant lots at the end of the cul-de-sac where people congregate and leave their garbage. Mr. Antles said he appreciates the efforts of the Police Department. Virginia Moses, 114 "M" Street S.E., Auburn Mrs. Moses reported there is an alley near the Wayland Arms Apartments off of 2nd Street S.E. Mrs. Moses stated she has been told that part of the alley belongs to the railroad. Mrs. Moses stated there are significant potholes in the alley, and she requested the alley be graveled and graded. Mrs. Moses stated she has seen the City gravel other portions of the alley but not the section at the end. Mrs. Moses suggested that if the City is not going to maintain that portion of the alley, it should be blockaded so people will not use it. Mrs. Moses also reported there is an abandoned vehicle at the end of Division Street which has been reported to the Police Department. Police Chief Purdy stated the owner had been contacted to remove the vehicle. Chief Purdy stated he would followup on the complaint. Councilmember Haugen stated the alley area near Wayland Arms as described by Mrs. Moses is in poor condition. Councilmember Haugen stated it may be difficult for emergency vehicles to travel the alley because of the potholes. Wend,/Belcheff, 4040 "1" Street N.E., Auburn, WA Mrs. Belcheff stated she has visited the library, but has been unable to obtain a City Code prior to 1987. Mayor Booth referred Mrs. Belcheff to the City Clerk's Office for the information. Page 12 City of Aubum Council Meeting Minutes February 21, 1995 Larry Hu.qhes, 208 "M" Street N.E., Auburn Mr. Hughes stated his wife owns the Rose Garden Restaurant on West Main Street. Mr. Hughes stated neither he or his wife understand the situation regarding street assessments and parking as it relates to their restaurant, and he requested more information. Mayor Booth suggested Mr. Hughes contact Senior Planner Lynn Rued for information on the parking requirements for his business. Mayor Booth stated the City is working with the Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Association to develop an intermediate process to deal with the downtown parking problem. Mayor Booth stated Senior Planner Lynn Rued is the best source of information with regard to parking as it relates to Mr. Hughes' business. Correspondence - None. III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS A3.7.6 Municipal Services Committee Chair Brothers reported the Municipal Services Committee met this afternoon at 4:30 p.m. and discussed police procedure and response to reported cases of sexual abuse. Chair Brothers also reported the Municipal Services Committee recommends City Council approval of Ordinance No. 4727, Resolution No. 2606, and authorization to advertise for bids for the interior remodel of the Municipal Services Building. The next meeting of the Municipal Services Committee is scheduled for March 6, 1995 at 4:30 p.m. Plannin,q & Community Development Committee Chair Burns reported the Planning & Community Development Committee met Tuesday, February 14, 1995. Committee Chair Burns requested the City Council's support for those items which appear in this evening's agenda. The next meeting of the Planning and Community Development Committee is scheduled for Tuesday, February 28, 1995. Public Works Committee Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee met on February 13, 1995, and discussed a utility bill adjustment for the Page 13 City of Auburn Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 Auburn Adventist Academy conditioned upon approval by Metro, a large land purchase from the Storm Water Capital Fund, an update on the Cenex fuel leak, and received a presentation on the Comprehensive Water Plan. Chair Wagner requested the City Council's support of Resolution No. 2612 on this evening's agenda. Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee's next regularly scheduled meeting will be held February 27, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., and the agenda will include a discussion of the Level of Service Traffic Standards. Finance Finance Committee Chair Barber reported the Finance Committee met this evening, and recommends City Council approval of claims and payroll vouchers and surplus property as they appear on tonight's agenda. The next meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled for March 6, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. IV. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes 1. Minutes of the February 6, 1995 regular City Council meeting. Vouchers F4.9.2,F4.9.5 Claims Claims Voucher Nos. 99171 through 99714 (except voided Voucher Nos. 99266 through 99471) covering Period 15 in the amount of $1,460,302.51 and dated February 21, 1995. Payroll Payroll check numbers 212741 to 213157 in the amount of $728,993.75 and Direct Payroll Deposit transmissions in the amount of $141,943.88 for a grand total of $870,937.63 for the pay period covering January 24, 1995 to February 8, 1995 and dated February 21, 1995. Contract Administration Public Works Project No. 538 O4.4.11.1 Request permission to Advertise for PR 538, Contract No. 95- 05, the Interior Remodel of The Municipal Services Building. Page 14 City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes February 21, 1995 Public Works Project No. 516 Public Works Project No. 520 04.4.10.2, PR 520, O4.10 PR516 Approve Final Pay Estimate to Totem Electric of Tacoma, Inc. for Traffic Signal Improvement at 6th & "A" Street SE, PR 516, and Guardrail Installation at Mountain View Cemetery, PR 520 in the total amount of $914.85. Surplus Property F4.6.1 Public Works Request permission to surplus the small equipment listed below, and use as a trade. 1989 Bartell Grinder; Street Inventory No. 101.048; Serial No. 2110 Model No. SP8G; Value $1,887.00 Personnel Department City Council to authorize the Personnel Department to surplus the following equipment because it is old, outdated, and no longer useful: Olivetti typewriter ET 225 (013-187). Original value $1272.00. Bell and Howell Reel Projector (Serial #19859). Original value $805.00. Utility Bill Adiustment F4.5.2 Request approval to adjust the following utility bill: Account Number 5.03.2160 in the amount of $157,625.64 for the Auburn Adventist Academy located at 511 32nd Street S.E. Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Brothers to approve Consent Agenda Item Numbers IV.A. 1 through IV.E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None. Page 15 City of Auburn Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 VI. NEW BUSINESS Application No. ANX0001-95 O3.1 ANX0001-95 City Council consideration on the request of Thomas Academy School, property owner representing 27% of the assessed valuation of proposed annexation property, to prepare and authorize circulation of an annexation petition to property owners in an 18-acre parcel of property located south of 280th Street and lies generally between "B" Street N.W. and Auburn Way North. Motion by Councilmember Burns, second by Councilmember Wagner to authorize the preparation and circulation of a petition for annexation. MOTION CARRIED. 5-1. Councilmember Haugen voted no. VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinances Ordinance No. 4727 04.7.2 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving reimbursement of funds in the amount of Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Five Dollars ($15,205), and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with King County to accept the reimbursement of funds to be used to provide waste reduction and recycling programs and/or services to the City's businesses. Motion by Councilmember Brothers, second by Councilmember Barber to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 4727. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0. Resolutions Resolution No. 2606 04.7.2 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement for professional services for a litter control program between the City of Auburn and Vadis Northwest. Page 16 City of Aubum Council Meetin.q Minutes February 21, 1995 Motion by Councilmember Brothers, second by Councilmember Barber to adopt Resolution No. 2606. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0. Resolution No. 2612 A3.13.4 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, State of Washington, declaring the authorization to sell and convey that portion of property to be acquired under Resolution No. 2605 Tax Parcel Number 173580-0065, to the adjacent property owner Tax Parcel Number 173580-0060 as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, for payment to the City of Auburn in the amount of $23,150.00 pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Auburn and Jerry McNeill and Kenneth L. Armstrong dated January 27, 1995. Motion by Councilmember Wagner, second by Councilmember Borden to adopt Resolution No. 2612. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0. VIII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Executive Session The Mayor recessed the regular meeting to Executive Session at 9:25 p.m. for approximately 20-30 minutes to discussion potential litigation and personnel matters. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting reconvened at 9:50 p.m. There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Charles A. Booth, Mayor Robin Wohlhueter, City Clerk 95M2-21 a Page 17