HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-17-1997 Council Minutes CITY OF AUBURN
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 17, 1997 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
Mayor Booth called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and led those
in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call
Mayor Booth and the following members of the Auburn City Council
were present: Rich Wagner, Sue Singer, Jeanne Barber, Trish
Borden, Fred Poe, and Gene Cedno. Councilmember Stacey
Brothers was excused. Staff members present included: Police
Chief Dave Purdy, Fire Chief Bob Johnson, Personnel Director
Brenda Heineman, Parks and Recreation Director Dick Deal,
Finance Director Diane L. Supler, Assistant Finance Director
Shelley Coleman, Financial Analyst Sherri Crawford, City Engineer
Dennis Dowdy, Water Utility Engineer Carl Every, Traffic Engineer
Steve Mullen, Planning and Community Development Director Paul
Krauss, Assistant Planning Director Lynn Rued, Senior Planner
Bob Sokol, Associate Planner Bea Sanders, City Attorney Michael
J. Reynolds, and City Clerk Danielle Daskam.
C. Announcements and Appointments
1. Announcements
There were no announcements this evening.
2. Appointments
There were no appointments for City Council consideration
this evening.
D. Agenda Modifications
Page1
t;ity of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Agenda modifications included correspondence from Peter Frame for the
North Auburn Owners transmitted under Item II.C,1 of these minutes,
correspondence from Michael A. Hart transmitted under Item II.C.2 of
these minutes, a corrected agenda bill for Public Works Project Number
PR 580 transmitted under Item IV.D.1 of these minutes, and a corrected
agenda bill for Public Works Project Number PR 623 transmitted under
Item IV.D,2 of these minutes,
II, CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A, Public Hearings
1. Application No. REZ0002-97
03.8 REZ0002-97
The following is a closed record hearing where comments
are limited to the existing record and no new evidence or
information is allowed to be submitted.
The request of Puget Western for a rezone from the existing
zoning of Unclassified to R-4, Multi-family, for property
consisting of 8.8 acres in size and located on the south side
of Oravetz Road and approximately 1,600 feet west of "R"
Street.
Mayor Booth opened the closed record hearing.
Mrs. Ralph Scholtz, 4220 Kennedy Avenue SE, Auburn, WA
Mrs. Scholtz advised she lives adjacent to the property
requested for rezone, and is opposed to the rezone request.
She expressed concern with the proposed development's
impact on the traffic, water, sewer and wildlife in the area.
Mrs. Scholtz commented that in 1988 her property was
included as part of the Lakeland Hills Special Area Plan
without prior notification to her.
In response to a question from Councilmember Borden, Mrs.
Scholtz explained that she accesses her home via Kennedy
Drive and Oravetz Road. She does not have access to the
Lakeland Hills development.
Mr. Craiq Krueger, Dodds Engineers, 4205 148~ Avenue
NE, Suite 200, Bellerue, WA
Page 2
City of Auburn Council Meetin,el Minutes November t7, t997
Mr. Krueger spoke on behalf of the applicant. He
acknowledged that further detailed studies will be required
prior to development of the property. The applicant is
requesting to rezone the property from Unclassified to R-4,
multi-family which is consistent the the Comprehensive Plan
designation and the Special Area Plan for Lakeland Hills.
Virginia Hauaen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen expressed concern with development of the
eight-acre parcel as multi-family and questioned the
approximate number of units that could be constructed on
the site. Assistant Planning Director Rued advised that an
R-4 zone allows up to 18 units per acre. Ms. Haugen also
expressed concern for the wildlife that exist on the property.
Jerry Piger, 4280 Kennedy Avenue SE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Piger spoke regarding the inclusion of his property in the
Lakeland Hills Special Area Plan and against the rezone
proposal. He questioned whether the properties along
Kennedy Avenue should be part of the Lakeland Hills
Special Area Plan. He described the proposed rezone site
as containing steep slopes, and expressed concern
regarding development of the site as multi-family. He also
expressed concern with the amount of traffic on Oravetz
Road.
In response to questions from Councilmember Poe,
Assistant Planning Director Rued clarified that the properties
along Kennedy Avenue SE are not part of the Lakeland Hills
Special Area Plan. However, the property requested for
fezone is within the Lakeland Hills Special Area Plan.
Deanne Gribble, 3104 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Gribble identified herself as a former school bus driver
on Lea Hill. She expressed concern with the amount of
traffic on Lea Hill and for the safety of school bus occupants
in the Lea Hill area.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to close the hearing.
Page 3
City of Auburn Council Meetin.el Minutes November 17, 1997
Councilmember Poe questioned whether the development of
the Special Area Plan required notification of adjacent
property owners. Assistant Planning Director Rued advised
the Special Area Plan was done as an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan, and there is no statutory requirement
for notification.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Councilmember Borden noted that the Comprehensive Plan
designated the property as R-4 some time ago. In the
interim, the area has changed with the construction of a new
high school and the City's acquisition of property across the
street from the proposed development for park purposes. R-
1 zoning and park currently surround the subject property.
Councilmember Borden expressed concern with rezoning
the property to R-4.
In response to a question from Councilmember Cerino,
Assistant Planning Director Rued advised that the height
restrictions in an R-4 zone are 2-1/2 stories or 30 feet.
Councilmember Wagner agreed with Councilmember
Borden's comments that the area of the proposed rezone
has changed. However, Oravetz Road in the vicinity of the
proposed development has not changed and would need to
be improved prior to any development. He also questioned
whether the Plan suggests R-4 zoning or other multi-family
zoning. He pointed out that if the property is not rezoned at
this time, it remains as Unclassi~ed with all the restrictions of
the R-1 zone. He spoke in favor of disaffirming the Hearing
Examiner's decision.
Councilmember Barber disclosed that she had a previous
discussion with Mrs. Scholtz; however, their discussion will
not affect her consideration of the applicant's request.
Councilmember Barber agreed with comments made by
Councilmember Wagner and expressed her hesitance for
rezoning the property.
Councilmember Wagner suggested the City Council
disaffirm the Hearing Examiner's decision, and allow the
Page 4
City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes November 17, 1997
developer to submit another proposal if he wishes.
Councilmember Wagner indicated the current proposal is not
in the best interest of the residents at this time.
Councilmember Borden noted that the area south of the
White River is developing with some higher densities than
single family. She expressed concern with allowing the
atmosphere of the area to change by allowing a
development which detracts from the surrounding land uses,
In response to a question from Councilmember Singer,
Councilmember Wagner added that his opposition to R-4
zoning for the property is due to the condition of Oravetz
Road and the rural setting that the area residents have
enjoyed for some time. If conditions change in the future, he
indicated his willingness to consider multi-family zoning for
the property. He also noted that the Lakeland Hills Special
Area Plan does not have a time line, and several changes
have occurred in the area since the adoption of the Lakeland
Hills Special Area Plan.
Councilmember Cerino agreed with comments made by
Councilmember Wagner.
Councilmember Poe also expressed his support of
Councilmember Wagner's recommendation to disaffirm the
Hearing Examiner's decision and deny the rezone.
Motion by Councilmember Wagner, second by
Councilmember Singer to disaffirm the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation to rezone the subject property based upon
the findings of fact and conclusions identified by the Council.
City Attorney Reynolds advised he will prepare the
necessary ordinance based upon the Council's findings and
conclusions included in their discussion of the rezone
application.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Page 5
City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes November 17, t997
2. 1998 Budaet
F3.12
The 1998 Preliminary Budget for the fiscal year January 1
through December 31, 1998 has been placed on file with the
City Clerk. The public is encouraged to provide written or
verbal testimony on any provision of the proposed 1998
Budget. The City Council will consider revenue sources and
possible increases in property tax revenues.
Finance Director Supler presented the staff report for the
1998 Budget. She explained that 1998 Budget is the
culmination of a process that began in the spring of 1997.
The Council held workshop meetings on revenues and
budget expenditures earlier this year. At both meetings, the
Council made recommendations, and they have been
incorporated into the 1998 Budget. She also noted that also
on tonighrs agenda are three ordinances dealing with
property taxes and the 1998 Budget.
The majority of the City's revenues are from taxes and
services. Taxes comprise approximately 30% of the City's
revenues and utility services and charges comprise another
30% of the City's revenues. Approximately 37% of the City's
expenditures in 1998 are related to capital projects and 30%
of the expenditures are related to salaries and benefits. The
increase in the amount of capital project expenditures is due
to the City taking the lead in several capital projects with
other local governments. Traditionally, salaries and benefits
comprise the larger percentage of the budget, and it is
anticipated that the 1999 Budget will reflect a more typical
budget. In the General Fund, salaries and benefits comprise
69% of the expenditures. The General Fund budget
provides for a 2% growth factor in revenues as well as
increases in grant revenues from previous years. For
expenditures, the City continues with a baseline budgeting
philosophy. Departments were limited to a 3% increase in
discretionary expenditures, and overall salaries were
increased by 3.3% based upon collective bargaining
agreements.
Page 6
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Some issues that affect the 1998 Budget include the failure
of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) levy on
November 4, 1997. This represents a $355,000 loss in EMS
revenue ususally received from the County. The future
funding of EMS in unknown at this time. Program
improvements in the amount of $190,000 for safety and
training have been included in the 1998 Budget.
Referendum 47, relating to property, taxes was passed
during the recent general election. Referendum 47 limits
property tax increases to a new rate of inflation and not the
Consumer Price Index (CPI). The new rate of inflation is
1.9% compared to the CPI of 3.7%. The cost of living
adjustment (COLA) contained in the City's labor contracts is
calculated at a percentage of the CPI, and the 1998 COLA is
3.3%. The City is allowed to go above a 1.9% if the City can
demonstrate substantial need.
The estimated assessed valuation is $3,015,700,000. The
total assessed valuation will not be confirmed until January
or February of next year. The City's levy rate in 1997 was
$3.015, and the 1998 levy rate recommended for Council
adoption is $3.10. The impact of the City's 1998 levy rate on
a $150,000 home is $465 compared to $452 in 1997. The
average increase to a homeowner is approximately 2.88%.
Finance Director Supler clarified a recent newspaper article
in which it was reported the property taxes in Auburn would
increase by 5.2%. Statutorily, the City is limited to an overall
increase of 106% of the revenues that the City collected last
year. This year, it is recommended that the City increase its
revenues by 105.21%. However, the increase includes
increases in assessed valuations and the addition of new
construction assessed valuations.
In response to questions from Councilmember Borden, Ms.
Supler advised that the budget does not include EMS levy
funds since the County collects that amount. If it is
determined that the City must fund EMS and the advanced
life support system, the City could be impacted by $1.3
million.
Finance Director Supler highlighted some of the capital
projects included in the proposed budget: the library facility,
Page 7
City of Auburn Council Meetin.q Minutes November 17, t997
a new skate park facility, a handicapped accessible van for
special populations and senior citizens, a HazMat response
vehicle to replace an outdated vehicle, the first year's
funding for a new fire engine which will be accumulated over
two years, and the 277th Street corridor project which
includes streets and sewers.
One of the primary goals of the 1998 Budget is to maintain
the essential programs at the present level of service without
deteriorating the programs that the Council has committed
themselves to in previous years. Modest program
improvements are included for both staffing and one-time
fixed costs.
Mayor Booth opened the public hearing.
Virginia Haugen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen expressed support for portions of the City's
1998 proposed budget, but expressed concern with the
proposed increase in property taxes, proposed staffing
increases, and consultant fees for impact studies.
Finance Director Supler explained that the costs for three
studies performed by consultants are included in the
proposed budget. The studies include a sensitive areas
ordinance, a special area plan, and a fire station location
study.
Michael Bocatch, 111 "H" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Bocatch reported he recently attended a King County
Council public hearing on the County's proposed budget.
He reviewed the County's budget and noted over a dozen
cultural and social service expenditures proposed in the
general fund worth between $50 and $60 million which
would more than adequately fund the failed EMS levy. He
questioned whether cities should fund emergency medical
services since the voters defeated the EMS levy. He
suggested county and city budgets should be priodtized in a
manner which allocates funds first to public safety.
Desirable social service and cultural budget requests should
never take precedence over public safety and could be
voted on by the electorate. Mr. Bocatch reported he
Page 8
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, t997
personally lobbied against passage of the EMS levy. He
urged the Coucil to force the County to reprioritize their
budget by not providing City funds for emergency medical
services.
Mayor Booth reported the King County Council today failed
to pass a motion to fund the EMS with county funds. The
County indicated it would require a 13% across the board
budget cut to fund EMS from county funds.
Councilmember Borden and Mayor Booth also added that
much of the County's human service budget is comprised of
pass-through money from the state and dedicated to human
service programs, such as public health.
Deane Gdbble, 3104 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mrs. Gribble expressed concern with the City increasing
property taxes and City employee salaries and wages. She
indicated the City's increase in property taxes together with
other local tax increases, such as school district levies, is
burdensome to some residents.
Councilmember Poe pointed out that the property tax
increase presented by Finance Director Supler is based on
3.1 mills. The city's tax bill is slightly over 15 mills. The
$13.00 increase on 3.1 mills compared to the equivalent tax
on 15 mills is less than six tenths of one percent increase on
a persons total property tax.
Lynn Roberts, 11219 SE 323~d Street, Auburn, WA
Ms. Roberts identified herself as the King County program
manager for the Washington Women's Employment and
Education (VVWEE). She thanked the Council for their
support of the VWVEE program and maintaining the City's
commitment to human services. Community-based
organizations are expected to do more for more needy
people with less federal and state funds while the private
sector is reluctant to make up the difference. VVWEE's
survival depends upon the support of municipalities and the
private sector. She encouraged the Council to continue its
support of human services.
Page 9
City of Auburn Council Meetinc~ Minutes November 17, 1997
Terry Galliday, Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN)
Shelter
Ms. Galliday identified herself as the shelter director of
DAWN and thanked the City Council for their continued
support of the DAWN program.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Singer to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Poe noted that the proposed budget
includes $50,000 to hire a consultant to develop a sensitive
areas ordinance. He suggested that staff could develop the
ordinance, and the funding for it could be used elsewhere,
such as for the special areas neighborhood planning. He
expressed support for the fire station location study. He also
suggested that it appears premature to undertake a fire
impact fee study without knowing the level of Council
support for impact fees. He encouraged staff to continue to
its efforts to obtain private funding to supplement the City's
funding for the skate park.
Mayor Booth added that the skate park project assumes that
private funding will be available. He also advised that the
consulting services contracts referred to by Councilmember
Poe will be presented to the appropriate Council committees
for review and evaluation.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
3. Comprehensive Plan
03.4.3
This public hearing is an opportunity for public input prior to
consideration of the 1997 amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan. The City Council conducted a public
hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments
November 3, 1997 and continued the public hearing to this
evening's meeting. Although testimony can be given on any
of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments, the
following amendments will be primarily addressed this
evening:
Page 10
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #-5 Amend comprehensive
plan designations within the Lea Hill potential annexation area to reflect
the work of the Lea Hill Task Force.
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #6 Amend the comprehensive
plan map where appropriate to ensure consistency between plan
designation and zoning.
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #7 Amend the City's potential
annexation area (PAA) to remove those parcels contained within the King
County Agricultural Production District and change the comprehensive
plan map designation for the Stewart Parcel to Light Industrial.
Policy/Text Amendment #7 Adopt the report of the Lea Hill Task Force
as special area plan. This report addresses the issues concerning
annexation raised by the task force of Lea Hill residents and other
interested parties. The report includes proposed map revisions and
policy amendments affecting the Lea Hill potential annexation area.
Policy/Text Amendment #8 Adopt the new 1997 City of Auburn Parks
and Recreation Plan.
Policy/Text Amendment #10 Amend the section of the 1995 Water
Comprehensive Plan regarding fire flow.
Senior Planner Bob Sokol presented the staff report for the
proposed Comprehehensive Plan amendments. The
Council conducted a public hearing on November 3, 1997
and continued the hearing to this evening's meeting. He
identified changes for Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6.
At the public hearing on November 3, 1997, Mr. Norman
Buck suggested a changed to Map 5 of Amendment 6. The
change in Map 5 reflects the existing conditions. The
amendment, as originally proposed, called for changing a
large area to a portion of the cul-de-sac at "1" Place NE to
moderate density residential. Some of the area retained as
moderate density residential actually had recently
constructed single family homes. Mr. Sokol recommended
removing the moderate density residential designation from
that area. The second change is related to Map 4 of
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 6. A request was
received to adjust the boundaries to clearly indicate that the
properties fronting Harvey Road maintain their designation
as Office/Residential.
Page 11
City of Auburn Council Meeting1 Minutes November 17, 1997
With regard to Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 7, Mr.
Sokol reported that King County Superior Court upheld the
Boundary Review Board's decision to deny the Stewart
property annexation to the city of Auburn.
Mr. Sokol took the opportunity to thank members of the Lea
Hill Task Force for their work on the Lea Hill Task Force
Report. He recognized the following members of the Task
Force in attendance: Paula Thrush, Bob Keever, and Jim
Schwend. Staff recommends two minor changes to the
report. On page 8 change the first sentence under "City
Response:" to read: "The City intends to retain the zoning
and Comprehensive Plan designations that are found in the
King County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance."
The same change is recommended under "City Response"
of Issue #2 on page 9. The changes are not intended to
change the policy intent, but to provide consistency with
other language in the report.
Mr. Sokol asked that the City Council take testimony on the
preceding amendments and then allow additional new
comments on the proposed amendments which were
addressed at the November 3, 1997 public hearing.
Following conclusion of the public hearing, Council will be
requested to vote on the proposed amendments.
Mayor Booth opened the public hearing.
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #5 Amend
comprehensive plan designations within the Lea Hill
potential annexation area to reflect the work of the Lea Hill
Task Force.
Policy/Text Amendment #7 Adopt the report of the Lea Hill
Task Force as special area plan. This report addresses the
issues concerning annexation raised by the task force of Lea
Hill residents and other interested parties. The report
includes proposed map revisions and policy amendments
affecting the Lea Hill potential annexation area,
Robert Keever, 10812 SE 290th Street, Auburn, WA
Page 12
City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes November 17, 1997
Mr. Keever repoded he served on the Lea Hill Task Force,
and expressed his support for the adoption of the Lea Hill
Task Force Plan. He referred to Figure 1 of the Report
which contains the proposed zoning for the Lea Hill Area,
and advised there is an expectation that the zoning
designations will remain for some time. Senior Planner
Sokol interjected that it is the City's intent to adopt the Task
Force's report and put the zoning in place when an
annexation occurs. However, any request for a zone
change will go through the normal process for Council
consideration. Mr. Keever submitted a copy of a petition
containing signatures of property owners within the Olson
Creek watershed supporting the continuation of the one unit
per acre zoning that currently exists along the stream
corridor. He also presented a one-page fact sheet on Olson
Creek and Olson Canyon. He also offered a video tape for
the Council's review which was developed by the Olson
Creek Stewardship Committee and includes a brief tour of
the Olson Canyon.
Paula Thrush, 10872 SE 318th Place, Auburn, WA
Ms. Thrush reported she served nine months of the Lea Hill
Task Force. She urged the Council to retain the zoning
designations when annexation occurs. She expressed her
appreciation to the City for efforts to acquire more park land
for the Lea Hill area. She requested that when annexation
occurs on Lea Hill, that annexation not occur in a piecemeal
manner.
Virginia Haugen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen expressed her appreciation for the efforts of the
Lea Hill Task Force. She reminded those present that the
City Council has the authority to rezone property. She also
expressed concern with the possible rezone of the Stewart
property.
Councilmember Singer reported that she was a member of
the Lea Hill Task Force. The Task Force offered frank and
open discussions of issues. She thanked Senior Planner
Bob Sokol and Associate Planner Keith Niven for their
efforts and contributions to the Lea Hill Task Force.
Page 13
City of Auburn Council Meetin~l Minutes November 17, 1997
Councilmember Borden encouraged the Councilmembers to
view the video developed by the Olson Creek Stewardship
Committee.
Virginia Hauclen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 7. She expressed concern with the City's
designation of the Stewart property as Light Industrial.
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #6 Amend the
comprehensive plan map where appropriate to ensure
consistency between plan designation and zoning.
Harvey and Robin Walker, 916 22nd Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mr. And Mrs. Walker spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan
Map Amendment 6, specifically Map 2, and property that
has been in their family for 30 years. It was previously
owned by Mr. Walker's mother, Carol J. Walker, and is now
owned by he and his wife. All notices of the hearing on the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map and
Text were mailed to the previous owner, Carol J. Walker.
Mr. Walker requested that Council delay action on the
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 6 since he has had
less than one week's notice of the proposed amendments.
He submitted a copy of a letter addressed to the City
Council from he and his wife containing some of their
comments this evening. The proposed Comprehensive Plan
Map amendments calls for a change in zone designation of
the Walker property from multi-family to single-family
residential. Mr. and Mrs. Walker purchased the property as
an investment and for its development potential under the
current Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Walker pointed out that
his property is bordered on two sides by high-density
apartments. Mr. Sokol noted out that the current zoning
ordinance identifies the property as R-2, single family. The
purpose of the amendment is to make the Comprehensive
Plan Map designation consistent with the zoning. Mr. Sokol
recommended that the Council remove the proposed
amendment to Map 2 of Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 6 from the 1997 proposed amendments
pending further review.
Page 14
Citv of Auburn Council Meetin,q Minutes November 17, 1997
Councilmember Singer spoke in favor of removing the
proposed amendment to Map 2 of Map Amendment 6
pending further review and consider it again during next
year's amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
George Moerqeli, 1020 29u' Street SE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Moergeli spoke regarding Map 11 of Comprehensive
Plan Map Amendment 6. The proposed amendment is
bounded by 29th Street SE and "M" Street SE. Mr. Sokol
explained that the current Comprehensive Plan Map
designation for the area is high-density residential, while the
zoning for the area is R-2, single-family residential. In
response to a question from Mr. Moergeli, Mr. Sokol advised
that duplexes are allowed as a conditional use in an R-2
zone. Mr. Moergeli indicated he had no objection to the
proposed amendment.
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment #7 Amend the
City's potential annexation area (PAA) to remove those
parcels contained within the King County Agricultural
Production District and change the comprehensive plan map
designation for the Stewart Parcel to Light Industrial.
Bob West, 332 1st Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mr. West spoke on behalf of Dr. and Mrs. Arthur Stewart.
He asked for clarification of proposed Comprehensive Plan
Map Amendment 7. He understands the proposed
amendment will remove parcels contained within King
County's Agricultural Production District from the City's
potential annexation area with the exception of the Stewart
property which would be designated as Light Industrial
property. Mr. West recalled that earlier this year, the City
Council approved the potential annexation of the Stewart
property. The King County Boundary Review Board
subsequently found that a conflict exists between the County
Comprehensive Plan, which designates the property as
agricultural, and the City's Plan, which does not. Mr. West
advised that SAMP has preliminarily identified the Stewart
property as one of the few developable properties within the
APD. The Stewart property was also designated by the
County as lying within the APD without prior notification to
the Stewarts and has restricted the use of the Stewart
Page 15
City of Auburn Council Meetin;I Minutes November 17, 1997
property to solely agricultural uses. According to Mr. West,
the County has no intent to purchase the development rights
for the Stewart property.
The court recently upheld the Boundary Review Boards'
decision to deny the annexation proposal since the County's
and City's Comprehensive Plans are in conflict. Mr. West
indicated that the court decision may be appealed, and the
property may become available for annexation in 1998. If
the Council does not take steps at this point to redesignate
the Stewart property as Light Industrial, any amendment of
the designation for the Stewart property would have to wait
another year. If the property is annexed to the City in the
future with the Light Industrial Comprehensve Plan Map
designation, any potential use of the property would require
further review and approval by the City. Mr. West pointed
out that the Stewart property is within the urban growth area.
The property has been designated as a potentially
developable piece of property under the SAMP, and there
are minimal wetlands on the Stewart property. He also
indicated the City has policies in its Comprehensive Plan
which tend to discourage agricultural use for the Stewart
property, and the area between the current city limits and
277t" Street has environmental problems that need to be
cleared up. The Stewart property, if annexed and
designated Light Industrial, has potential for adding tax
revenues to the City. Mr. West urged the City Council to
approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment that would
permit Light Industrial uses on the property if it is annexed to
the City.
Councilmember Cerino questioned whether there had been
an amendment to the Light Industrial designation. Planning
and Community Development Director Krauss explained that
questions have been raised on whether or not an
Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) facility would
be allowed outright or by a conditional use in the M-1 zone,
and whether an INS facility is a governmental facility if it is
privately owned. Mr. Krauss determined the use would be a
governmental use, and a governmental use can be allowed
in any of the City's zones as a conditional use. However, it
can be concluded that when the zoning ordinance was
Page 16
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
drafted, a large facility such as the proposed INS facility was
not anticipated. Even if the property is designated M-l,
Light Indutrial, the proponent will be required to obtain the
approval of the City Council.
Mr. West acknowledged that the proposed use for the
Stewart property is the INS processing center and office
building. He also acknowledged that there is no guarantee
that the facility will be located there. If the INS facilility is not
located on the Stewart property, Dr. and Mrs. Stewart would
like to develop their property under the Light Industrial
designation.
Mr. West requested that the City Council continue to include
the Stewart property within the City's potential annexation
area and designate the property as Light Industrtial.
Councilmember Borden pointed out that the Stewart
property cannot be developed until it is annexed to the City.
Paula Thrush, 10872 SE 318th Place, Auburn, WA
Ms. Thrush reported she has been a resident of the Green
River valley for 45 years. She expressed concern with the
potential development of the Stewart property due to the
wetlands on the property, the road conditions and
congestion in the area, and the loss of agricultural land. She
urged the Council to reject the Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 7.
Deanne Gribble, 3104 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Gribble identified herself as a long-time community
resident. She urged the City Council to reject
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 7 and keep the
Stewart property as an agricultural use. She also spoke
against the possible location of an INS facility in Auburn.
Policy/Text Amendment #8 Adopt the new 1997 City of
Auburn Parks and Recreation Plan.
No one spoke regarding Policy/Text Amendment 8.
Page 17
City of Auburn Council Meetin{3 Minutes November 17, 1997
Policy/Text Amendment #'10 Amend the section of the
1995 Water Comprehensive Plan regarding fire flow.
No one spoke regarding Policy/Test Amendment 10.
Allen Corbin, 3112 "K" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Corbin spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 4, which was addressed at the November 3,
1997 public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan
amendments. Mr. Corbin spoke against the proposed plan
for a manufactured home park on 'T' Street NE.
Laurie Lane, 1204 31st Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Lane spoke regarding Comprehesnsive Plan Map
Amendment 4. She expressed concern with the proposed
manufactured home park on "1" Street NE and a single
access to the park. She expressed concern with the impact
that further development will have on the community's
schools. She distributed copies of an article taken from the
November 16, 1997 issue of the Seattle Times regarding the
sale of a mobile home. She urged the Council to deny
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 4.
Mary Suzanne Kuhel, 3108 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Kuhel spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 4. She recalled that on October 20, 1997, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 2878 which approved
the preliminary plat of a 22-1ot single-family subdivision
located on the east of 'T' Street NE and south of 40th Street
NE. The preliminary plat approved by Resolution No. 2878
is approximately one-half mile from the proposed mobile
home park on "1" Street NE.
Thomas Milliden, 1205 31st Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Milliden spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 4. Mr. Milliden urged the City Council to
designate the area as single-family residential.
Mary Urbach, Vandeberg, Johnson & Gandara, 1900 First
Interstate Plaza, 1201 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, WA
Ms. Urbach spoke regarding Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 3 to change the comprehensive plan map
Page 18
City of Auburn Council Meetin~l Minutes November 17, t997
designation for property known as Terrace View. She
recalled that at the public hearing held November 3, 1997, a
question arose regarding whether a comprehensive plan
amendment could be conditionally approved based upon a
preannexation agreement. She reported that according to a
state growth management official, the City can adopt a
comprehensive plan amendment conditioned upon a
preannexation agreement.
Councilmember Wagner inquired whether the City Council
must cite specifics of the preannexation agreement or cite
an acceptable preannexation agreement as approved by
Council. Senior Planner Sokol responded that the City
Council could vote to approve the comprehensive plan
amendment which would go into effect when a
preannexation agreement is signed and approved by the two
parties.
Planning and Community Development Director Krauss
clarified that the City can condition the comprehensive plan
amendment on entering into a preannexation agreement.
However, there should not be an expectation that the City
will enter into a preannexation agreement, If a
preannexation agreement is entered into between the City
and the Terrace View property owners, then the
comprehensive plan amendment would go into effect.
Ms. Urbach expressed her hope that the spirit of cooperation
would continue between the City and the developer of
Terrace View in the discussions regarding a preannexation
agreement.
City Attorney Reynolds advised that there has been a
request for a preannexation agreement. The City's Legal
Department does not recommend entering into a
preannexation agreement.
In response to a question from Councilmember Poe, City
Attorney Reynolds explained there appears to be an
expectation that the comprehensive plan amendment is
dependent upon an agreeable preannexation agreement.
Discussions of a preannexation agreement have been
Page 19
City of Auburn Council Meetin,Q Minutes November 17, t997
between the applicant and the Planning Department staff.
At this time, legal counsel does not recommend a
preannexation agreement.
Mary Urbach
Ms. Urbach explained that the subject of a preannexation
agreement is neutral. If the expectation is that a
preannexation agreement will not be considered, the
application should perhaps withdraw its request for a
comprehensive plan amendment and pursue a
preannexation agreement. She hoped that both parties
could continue to discuss and reach a mutually agreeable
preannexation agreement.
Virginia Haugen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
In response to a question from Ms. Haugen regarding the
Terrace View proposal, City Attorney Reynolds explained
that there appeared to be an expectation of successfully
working out a preannexation agreement. Although a
preannexation agreement may be achieved, there should
not be an expectation that a successful agreement will be
reached.
Vern Needham, 3107 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Mr. Needham spoke regarding proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendment 4. He asked whether a geophysical study
has been performed on the proposed site for the mobile
home park, and if not, will one be performed. Senior
Planner Sokol advised that a geotechnical study has not
been performed for the site yet. However, if during a
development review and the SEPA process, it may
determined that one is necessary prior to development.
Marlea Needham, 3107 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Needham asked who would make the determination for
a geotechnical study. Planning and Community
Development Director Krauss advised that he has been
designated as the City's SEPA official, and he makes a
determination based upon City staff comments.
Subsequently, the SEPA document is published for review
and comment by interested parties. Mr. Krauss advised that
parties can appeal an environmental determination to the
Page 20
City of Auburn Council Meetin~ Minutes November '17, t997
Hearing Examiner and ultimately to the City Council. Further
appeals beyond the City Council determination would be
through superior court.
Councilmember Poe requested a brief review of the Parks
and Receation Plan as proposed under Comprehensive
Plan Policy/Text Amendment 8. Parks and Recreation
Director Deal explained that the intent of the Park Plan is to
provide a tool to guide the City in its development of the park
system. The most current Park Plan was completed in
1986. In order to apply for grant funding, the City must have
a Park Plan approved on a six-year cycle. Without an
approved Park Plan, the City cannot secure outside funding.
The Park Plan gives the City direction in meeting the
community's needs for park and recreation facilities and
programs. If the Park Plan is approved, the City will be able
to apply to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor
Recreation for state grant funding next spring. He
recognized that after completion of the City's Capital
Facilities Plan next summer, changes may need to be made
in the Park Plan next year. The Plan does not bind the City
to any park impact fees. Impact fees would be considered
separately.
Councilmember Barber spoke in favor of Comprehensive
Plan Map Amendment 7 to designate the Stewart property
as Light Industrial, and expressed support for the annexation
of the property to the city.
Vircdnia Haugen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen complimented the City's park system.
However, she expressed concern that the City's recreational
vehicle (RV) park prohibits groups of less than four from
renting space at the RV park. She also spoke in favor of not
spending funds to improve the Olson Canyon park area.
MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Wagner, second by
Councilmember Borden to adopt Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 1.
Page 21
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 2.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Singer to adopt Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 3 and have it go into effect when and if the City
develops a preannexation agreement with the developers.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to approve the amendment for the
City-owned area located east of "1' Street NE, to deny and
take no action on the remainder of the area identified in part
"B" of proposed amendment 4, and to approve the changes
recommended by Mr. Sokol during his staff presentation.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Barber to approve Comprehensive Plan
Map Amendment 5 with changes recommended by Mr.
Sokol during his staff presentation.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 6 excluding Map 2 since no notice was given to
the current owner.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Councilmember Borden indicated it is in the City's best
interest to come to an agreement with King County
regarding the Stewart parcel and the annexation area
Page 22
City of Auburn Council Meetin;I Minutes November 17, 1997
around it. She fears designating the Stewart property as
Light Industrial at this time may affect the agreement
between the City and the county.
Motion by Councilmember Borden to deny Comprehensive
Plan Map Amendment 7.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment 7 to retain the City's current potential
annexation area and designate the Stewart property parcel
as Light Industrial.
MOTION CARRIED. 5-1. Councilmember Borden voted no.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Policy/Text Amendment 1.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 2.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 3.
Councilmember Poe questioned whether a portion of the
language in Amendment 3 which reads, "The City of Auburn
shall require annexation as a condition of extending sewer
and water" should instead read "require an annexation
agreement." Mr. Sokol explained that the language applies
to those properties applying for utility services and located
adjacent to the city limits.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Page 23
City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes November 17, 1997
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 4.
Councilmember Poe questioned the minimum building size
of 5,000 square feet for drive-in facilities in the Auburn North
Business Area Plan. Planning and Community Development
Director Krauss explained that many of the banking
institutions are in excess of 5,000 square feet and many of
the drive-in restaurants are less than 5,000 square feet.
Senior Planner Sokol added that the purpose of the
amendment is to prevent small drive-up businesses such as
espresso stands and film processing booths.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 6.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Singer to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Text/Policy Amendment 7 with the amendments suggested
by Mr. Sokol.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 8.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 9.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Page 24
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Comprehensive Plan
Policy/Text Amendment 10.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
B. Audience Participation
Paula Thrush,
Ms.Thrush advised that traffic counts have not been done on Lea
Hill since 1992, and new traffic counts will be performed and their
results should be available by December 10.
Ms. Thrush announced that King County's final report for the
Transfer of Development Rights Receiving (TDR) Areas Plan. She
presented a copy of the Final Plan to the City Council. She pointed
out that the properties that will receive 100% densities are the west
hill of Renton, Kent, and all of Lea Hill. She urged the Council to
assist in convincing King County to remove Lea Hill as a TDR area.
Deanne Gribble, 3104 "L" Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Gribble thanked the City Council for their action on
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 4 this evening. She
questioned the process to begin the rezone of the "1" Street
property as single family. Senior Planner Sokol explained that
before a rezone can be accomplished, the Comprehensive Plan
would need to be changed. Changes to the Comprehensive Plan
are done once a year. He suggested that she put her
recommendations in writing to the Planning Department so that it
may be considered by Council next year.
Virginia Haugen, 2503 "R" Street SE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Haugen expressed concern with the City's 1998 Budget, taxes,
and the development taking place in Auburn. She commended the
police and fire departments, and she urged the. City Council to
make public safety a priority.
Carolyn Wilson, 31"t Street NE, Auburn, WA
Ms. Wilson thanked the City Council for their vote on
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 4, and for the opportunity to
speak before the Council this evening. She also thanked the Fire
Page 25
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Department for their response to a recent false alarm at her
residence.
C. Correspondence
1. A letter dated November 11, 1997, addressed to Mayor
Booth and Council Members from Peter Frame for the North
Auburn Owners regarding pending City of Auburn - Port of
Seattle Interlocal Agreement.
2. A letter dated November 17, 1997, addressed to Mayor
Booth and members of the City Council from Michael A. Hart
regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Ill. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Municipal Services
Vice Chair Poe reported the Municipal Services Committee met this
afternoon at 4:30 p.m. The Committee recommends authorizing a
call for bids for a new triple combination pumper for the Fire
Department. The next regular meeting of the Municipal Services
Committee is scheduled for Monday, December 1, 1997 at 4:30
p.m.
B. Planning & Community Development
Chair Barber reported the Planning and Community Development
Committee met November 10, 1997. The Committee discussed
several items which appear later on tonighrs agenda. The next
regular meeting of the Planning and Community Development
Committee is scheduled for November 24, 1997 at 7:30 p.m.
C. Public Works
Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee met November
10, 1997 and discussed and recommended approval of several
items that appear on this evening's agenda. The Committee also
met in a special session this evening at 5:00 p.m. to review the
capital projects included in the 1998 Budget. The next regular
meeting of the Public Works Committee is scheduled for Monday,
November 24, 1997 at 5:00 p.m.
Page 26
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November t7, 1997
D. Finance
Chair Barber reported the Finance Committee met this evening at
7:00 p.m. The Committee discussed Ordinance Nos. 5045, 5046,
and 5047 and Resolution Nos. 2885 and 2890 as they appear on
this evening's agenda. The Committee also reviewed and
recommended approval of claims and payroll vouchers.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes
1. Minutes of the November 3, 1997 regular City Council
meeting.
B. Vouchers
F4.9,2, F4.9.5
1. Claims
Claims check numbers 127754 through 128101 in the
amount of $1,347,077.16 for Period 11 and dated November
17, 1997.
2. Payroll
Payroll check numbers 242259 to 242520 in the amount of
$835,201.17 and electronic deposit transmissions in the
amount of $460,669.58 for a grand total of $1,295,870.75 for
the pay period covering October 29, 1997 to November 13,
1997 are approved for payment this 17th day of November,
1997.
C. Call for Public Hearin.el
1. Draft Telecommunications Ordinance
O3.10.9, 04.0
City Council to call for a public hearing to be held on
December 1, 1997 on a draft ordinance regulating
commercial wireless telecommunication facilities on City-
owned property and within public rights of way, and other
ordinances related to telecommunications.
Page 27
City of Auburn Council Meeting Minutes November 17, 1997
D. Contract Administration
1. Public Works Project Number PR 580
O4.8.1 PR 580
City Council to award Contract No. 97-25, Public Works
Project Number PR 580, South Central Storm Drainage
Improvements, to Tri-State Construction, Inc. on their low bid
of $747,781.00 plus Washington State sales tax.
2. Public Works Project Number PR 623
O4.11.1 PR623
City Council to award Contract No. 97-24, Public Works
Project Number PR 623, Coal Creek Springs Nodh
Collection Improvement, to Tri-State Construction on their
low bid of $794,395.00 plus Washington State sales tax, and
accept that the bidder not signing for the receipt of
Addendum #2 on the bid proposal is not significant.
3. Public Works Project Number PR 576
O4.9.1 PR 576
City Council to accept the project and approve Final Pay
Estimate No. 5 to Apply-A-Line for Public Works Contract
Number 96-15, Project Number PR 576, 1996
Channelization, in the amount of $264.29.
4. Public Works Project Number 529
O4.9.1 PR 529
City Council to approve Change Order No. I in the amount
of $4,500.00; and accept the project and approve Final Pay
Estimate No. 1 to Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating, Inc.
for Public Works Contract Number 97-09, Project Number
PR 529, the Demolition of the BaxterNVhalley Residences, in
the amount of $47,567.94.
E. Call for Bids
1. Fire Department Triple Combination Pumper
City Council authorize the fire department to call for bids for
a triple combination pureper with 65-foot telescopic water
tower/aerial ladder.
Page 28
City of Auburn Council Meetinn Minutes November 17, 1997
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by Councilmember Singer to
approve the Consent Agenda as modified.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There were no items for City Council review under this section.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Development Agreement Number WSC0011-96
A3.13.8
City Council to consider approval of Addendum I to Development
Agreement No, WSC0011-96 between the City and William
Finkbeiner for approximately 32.8-acres to include dedication of the
Bonneville Power line easement for future park purposes.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by Councilmember
Wagner to approve Addendum I to the development agreement,
and to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
ordinance.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. O~inances
1. Ordinance No. 5045
F6.6.3, F3.12
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing the levy of regular property taxes
by the City of Auburn for collection in 1998, representing an
increase over regular property taxes levied for collection in
1997.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Poe to introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
5045.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Page 29
City of Auburn Council Meetincl Minutes November 17, 1997
2. Ordinance No. 5046
F6.6.3, F3.12
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, fixing the amount to be raised by ad valorem
taxes for fiscal year 1998 for the City of Auburn,
Washington, pursuant to the provisions of R.C.W.
35A. 33.135.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Singer to introduce and adopt Ordinance
No. 5046.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
3. Ordinance No. 5047
F3.12
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, adopting the budget for the City of Auburn,
Washington, for the year 1998.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Singer to introduce and adopt Ordinance
No. 5047.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
B. Resolutions
1. Resolution No. 2885
A3.12.5
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
a contract for public defense services for 1998-1999
between the City and Jenkins, Hardy and Associates,
P.L.L.C.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Singer to adopt Resolution No. 2885.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
Page 30
City of Auburn Council Meetinq Minutes November 17, 1997
2. Resolution No. 2886
A1.7, F5.3, O4.10
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing execution of Commute Trip
Reduction Act Interlocal Agreement between King County
and the City of Auburn to allocate to the City its
proportionate share of state technical assistance funding for
reimbursement costs for implementing a Commute Trip
Reduction Plan and to continue a cooperative approach
between the City and County and to address
interjurisdictional issues.
Motion by Councilmember Wagner, second by
Councilmember Poe to adopt Resolution No. 2886.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
3. Resolution No. 2887
A1.3
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute the 1997
Service Agreement between the City of Auburn and the
Economic Development Council of Seattle and King County.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Resolution No. 2887 and
authorize the contract between the City and the Economic
Development Council of Seattle and King County.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
4. Resolution No. 2888
04.4.9.1.2
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
an Engineering Service Contract with W&H Pacific, Inc., for
North Hangar Area Improvements at the Auburn Municipal
Airport.
Motion by Councilmember Borden, second by
Councilmember Wagner to adopt Resolution No. 2888 and
Page 31
City of Auburn Council Meeting3 Minutes November 17, 1997
authorize the contract between the City of Auburn and W &
H Pacific.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
5. Resolution No. 2890
O3.4.1.4
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn,
Washington, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
an Agreement for Professional Services between
Henderson, Young & Company and the City of Auburn, to
update the existing Capital Facilities Plan for the City of
Auburn.
Motion by Councilmember Barber, second by
Councilmember Singer to adopt Resolution No. 2890.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0.
VIII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Executive Session
Mayor Booth recessed the meeting to executive session at 10:33
p.m. for approximately fifteen minutes in order to discuss litigation.
Mayor Booth indicated no action is anticipated this evening as a
result of the executive session.
Mayor Booth reconvened the meeting at 10:47 p.m.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council this evening,
the meeting adjourned at 10:47 p.m.
Approved on the / 2-(" day of ~ ,1997.
Charles A. Booth, Mayor Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
97m11-17
Page 32