HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-11-1998sp SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
STUDY SESSION ON
THE AUBURN DOWNTOWN PLAN / TRANSIT STATION
MAY 11, 1998 6:00 PM
Auburn City Hall
Council Work Area
Minutes
I. INTRODUCTION
Mayor Booth called the special meeting of the Auburn City Council to order at
6:10 p.m. in the Council Work Area of Auburn City Hall. Mayor Booth and the
following members of the City Council were present: Jeanne Barber, Sue Singer,
Pete Lewis, Trish Borden, Fred Poe, Gene Cerino and Rich Wagner.
Staff members present included: Planning and Community Development
Director Paul Krauss, Senior Planner Bob Sokol, Associate Planner Shirley
Schultz, Fire Chief Bob Johnson, Finance Director Diane L. Supler, City Attorney
Michael J. Reynolds, City Engineer Dennis Dowdy, Special Projects Engineer
Jack Locke, Senior Engineer Dennis Selle, Traffic Engineer Steve Mullen, and
Deputy City Clerk Cathy Richardson.
Mayor Booth explained the purpose of the meeting is an information session to
discuss the Auburn Downtown Transit Station.
II. DOWNTOWN VISION STATEMENT
Planning and Community Development Director Paul Krauss explained the
Auburn Downtown Transit Station remains a timely issue for the City. Events are
staffing to accelerate which lead to the Downtown Plan implementation and the
Transit Station being ready to receive passengers in 1999. The Transit Hub,
Downtown Plan and 3rd Street ramp project are being worked on concurrently.
City staff and the Citizen Committee's participation and discussion with the
community vision have been extensive. Mr. Krauss stated that, although the final
Transit Station plan is still in the design phase, property acquisition on some
SpeciaiCity Council Meeting Minutes
May 11,1998
Page 2
parcels around the Station would begin in the next few weeks. Property
acquisition would be initiated by the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) in the near
future. Plans for the design of the Transit Station are being developed.
Mr. Krauss stated the impact of these projects on the City is tremendous. Within
the next eighteen to twenty-four months, approximately forty million dollars will be
expended toward public infrastructure improvement in downtown Auburn. The
Downtown Plan will simplify acquiring environmental approvals, increase
downtown parking, upgrade and improve the downtown street system, increase
potential retail space, modify pedestrian access, and increase potential revenue.
The vision is the private sector will, in turn, reinvest revenue back into the
downtown area.
Senior Planner Bob Sokol stated the Downtown Task Force Committee has been
meeting since November, 1997. The main issues dealt with by the Committee
were the 3rd Street grade separation, the Downtown vision, the Downtown Market
Study, Transit Station, and land use in the larger downtown area. A draft
Downtown Plan is expected by July, 1998 for review. A draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is expected by September, 1998 with a final EIS and
Downtown Plan completed by December, 1998.
Mr. Sokol explained that the draft Downtown Vision Statement involved
significant public involvement and interviews. Images of different types of
development were used in determining preference in design and style for the
downtown area and Transit Center area. The purpose of the Downtown Vision is
to provide a visual and textural framework for the goals of the Downtown Plan. It
can be used as a promotional document and as a basis for design guidelines for
future development.
The Committee determined that public preference indicated a strong desire to
retain the historical value and small town feel in the downtown area. Public
safety and comfort (especially in the proposed parking structure), maintenance of
public areas, additional residential areas, and parking structure design were also
high priority issues. The preference for structure design was for brick and
traditional materials retaining the historical heritage, large windows, awnings,
mixed use of building materials for multi-story structures, and pedestrian retail
orientation for ground floors.
The inclination for street design was a center planted median, right of way
landscaping, special paving for pedestrian crossings and sidewalks, decorative
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1998
Page 3
light poles, underground utilities, integrated art, and retaining a pedestrian
oriented district.
The general consensus on the Transit Center design was for use of traditional
materials, possibly a railway station clock tower, and open space lawns. And for
the parking garage to blend in and be constructed of brick and traditional
materials and possibly have ground floor retail.
The preference on downtown housing was for ample landscaping, balconies, well
modulated facades, gabled roof lines, mixed use retail on the ground floor with
apartments above, and for set back construction for buildings over two stories.
Mr. Sokol asked that Council review and submit comments on the draft
Downtown Vision. A revised, final version of the Downtown Vision will be
presented to Council for adoption in June.
In response to questions from Councilmembers Wagner and Lewis, Mr. Sokol
stated that building height requirements may not be addressed in the draft
Downtown Vision and should be. The data gathered by the Committee indicated
that the height of the structure need not be restricted, but the preference is for a
"set back" design for the upper stories to minimize the impact of taller buildings.
One particular area identified for redevelopment is just south of Sunbreak Caf~,
tying in the needs of residents desiring to live near the transit center or in the
downtown area. Having residents living in the downtown area is an important
part of increasing a sense of security,
III. DOWNTOWN MARKET STUDY
Greg Easton, Property Counselors reported on the Summary of Market Analysis.
The purpose of the market analysis is not to predict the future, but to look to the
future and identify potential opportunities for development. This provides a basis
for developing a physical plan for the downtown area regarding structure
placement, land usage, and a strategic plan. Auburn is a major employment
center, which creates great economic strength and opportunities for further
development. Auburn also has a large residential trade area with an average
income of $60,000 per family per year. The market area will increase with a
projected population growth of 227,000 by the year 20'10 and to over 250,000 by
the year 2020.
Mr. Easton recapped the development influences and economic performance of
the downtown area as it exists today. Auburn retains strong apparel and
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1998
Page 4
accessories businesses, a major food retailer, and a mix of single, multi-family,
and senior housing which creates a balance between residential and business
development. Future opportunities in growth in the region, the market area, and
prosperity for existing businesses affirm tangible support for the Transit Station.
The market study indicates an immediate need for continued growth in office
development with incremental growth in retail development and a very strong
opportunity for growth in housing development. The market analysis projects an
additional 90,000 to 300,000 square feet of retail development within the
downtown area by the year 2010. The lower end of this range represents
continued growth at a moderate rate. The upper end represents an aggressive
approach in both the private and public sectors, and a cooperative effort of
promotion of Auburn for business opportunities. Due to the medical and
governmental employers in downtown Auburn, there is also potential for creation
of additional multi-story office development. Growth in all employment sectors
could absorb perhaps 15,000 square feet per year.
A full service lodging structure in a prominent location with visibility from SR18
and close to SR167 would be a particular attraction to the downtown area, but
may require some cooperative investment by the City and the private sector.
Residential development at present is affordable and has a very low vacancy
rate. Residential accessibility to a transportation resource would provide a strong
attraction for future development in downtown Auburn and potential for an
immediate 100 units of housing and a sustainable level of housing absorption of
25 to 50 units each year.
Mr. Easton pointed out that achievement of these opportunities would require
participation by both the private and public sector. Actions by the public sector
could start by projecting a business and development friendly City. This can be
accomplished by streamlining the permit process for residential and commercial
projects through preparation of an Economic Impact Statement for the downtown
plan, providing information and feasibility for potential for private projects,
investment in public facilities and downtown amenities, and assemblage of some
key properties for demonstration projects to create the identity and image the
City would like to project.
Councilmember Lewis requested clarification of locations, rental costs, and the
type of structures of the projected communities in and around the Transit Center.
Mr. Easton responded that rents throughout Auburn are slightly less than other
communities located within King County. The housing provided throughout the
city is quality housing that is attractive to a wide range of consumers. There is a
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1998
Page 5
shodage of affordable housing throughout the region. The trend is for more
downtown housing which is close to goods and services, public amenities, jobs,
and public transit.
IV. THE TRANSIT CENTER
Associate Planner Shirley Schultz spoke regarding the conceptual design of the
Transit Center. Ms. Schultz referred to a 1995 schematic design developed by a
University of Washington student group and a currant draft schematic design
developed by Arai/Jackson Architects and Planners. Some conceptual design
changes are in the location and design of the parking structure and the transit
area moved to a circular pattern rather than a linear pattern. Parking capacity
remains at 150 spaces. This allowed for more maneuverability, efficiency in
space, bringing more parking downtown for dual use, and brought the transit
route closer to the current Metro route for ease in circulation. The current design
also brought less motorized traffic through the pedestrian traffic areas. Ms.
Schultz pointed out that this is not a final design but a concept of where facilities
might be placed.
In response to questions from Councilmember Lewis, Ms. Schultz pointed out the
location of the Transit Center would be incorporated with an elevated pedestrian
bridge over the tracks, which is a requirement of RTA. The circular formation of
the transit area also allows for use of different sized buses.
Mr. Krauss spoke to the fact that the current plan is more schematic and
basically lays out the components to see where they work more efficiently. It will
be revised as to structure, public space and public connections to Main Street.
Ms Schultz emphasized the surrounding land use and the downtown vision will
play a major pad in determining design of the Transit Center. Special Project
Engineer Jack Locke pointed out that the Transit Center schematic design was
originally designed to accommodate an Amtrak Station.
Councilmember Lewis expressed concern with the adequate size of the current
Transit Center design in relation to future population growth.
Mr. Sokol advised that the parking needs were projected to the year 2010. The
bus hubs can accommodate ten to twelve buses and street design will allow
adequate space for additional parking facilities to be built in future if necessary.
The current plan allows for flexibility in placement of facilities.
SpeciaiCity Council Me~ing Minutes
May 11,1998
Page 6
Ms. Schultz described some potential land purchases by RTA in connection with
the Transit Center and the street improvements that would occur to A Street as
part of the RTA project and to 3rd and C Streets as part of the ramp project. Ms.
Schultz distributed and summarized handouts on public comments regarding the
Transit Center and a schedule for completion. Ms. Schultz passed around for
Council's viewing, enlarged photographs of some of the structures contained in
the Draft Downtown Vision and recapped public comments in connection with
them. The scheduled completion date for the Transit Center is December, 1999.
In response to questions by Councilmembers Lewis and Singer, Ms. Schultz
stated that the design period is relatively short. Ms. Schultz clarified right-of-way
properties for the railroad.
Councilmember Borden requested clarification of a structure and the pedestrian
plaza shown on the design. Ms. Schultz stated the structure is an existing
structure occupied by Lynn's Antiques, Truitt facade, and Pastime Tavern.
Harold's Plumbing is also located in this structure in addition to approximately
thirty-five apartments on the upper level. The design lacks a pedestrian plaza at
this time, but the consensus is that it be added back into the design.
Councilmember Wagner questioned who would be in charge of analyzing bus
traffic. Ms. Schultz stated it would be a cooperative arrangement between the
City and Metro.
In response to a question by Councilmember Poe regarding a commercial
property located on West Main, west of the railroad tracks Ms. Schultz stated that
she believed it to be on the list of contacts for RTA for property acquisition.
V. TRANSIT CENTER BUDGET AND AVAILABLE FUNDS
Mr. Jack Locke distributed a project funding and budget handout. Mr. Locke
explained that the station is divided into two parts. One part being the station
campus which are the sites the RTA requires. Mr. Locke expanded on
Councilmember Poe's question on the Don Small property on West Main. It is
not known at this time whether this property would be redeveloped, upgraded, or
purchased by RTA.
Mr. Locke reviewed the funding to come from RTA and King County Department
of Transportation (DOT) together with the City of Auburn. Total budget is $12.6
million. RTA will contribute approximately $10 million, King County $1.5 million,
and the City will contribute $1.1 million in Transportation Improvement Board
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1998
Page 7
funds. RTA will be the active developer of the project doing all of the on-site land
acquisition, construction and construction management. King County DOT will
act as technical advisor.
In response to questions from Councilmembers Lewis and Wagner, Mr. Locke
stated that, up to this point, control of development of the downtown plan has
been under the control of the City with minimum input from RTA. The major
elements of the Transit Center are a parking garage with retail facilities, a parking
lot with warehousing of land for future parking lots if desired, a pedestrian over-
crossing, a bus hub, and a furnished shelter. Mr. Locke explained a shelter
would be used for shod increments of time. W~th commuter rail and bus transfer
a station is not necessary. The retail areas of the parking structure could be
used during inclement weather. In the event of Amtrak coming into the City in
the future, there would be ample land for a station structure.
Councilmember Poe questioned the control of the proposed retail space within
the parking structure. Mr. Locke stated that RTA would construct a shell.
Constructing public restrooms is a consideration of the City. RTA will not provide
funds to build or maintain restrooms. Restrooms could be constructed in the
retail area of the parking structure. Some options regarding the retail area are
that it could be managed by the developer, by a broker, or by a property
manager. This issue, and the income it would generate, are issues that would be
brought before the Council.
In response to question by Councilmember Wagner, Mr. Bob Sokol corrected a
misstatement made earlier in the meeting. The first draft of the Transit Center
was created by OTAK in 1995 when the Commuter Rail Station Siting Study was
done. University of Washington students created the model. The parking
structure was relocated to get it closer to the downtown core and adjacent
businesses.
VI. RTA INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
Mr. Locke stated that total development of the station, including off-site and
storm mitigation, is approximately $16 million. The City will provide about 30%.
A tri-party agreement between RTA, City of Auburn, and King County is in the
being developed.
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1998
Page 8
VII. QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION
Councilmember Poe commented that no new data was included in the Draft
Downtown Plan and requested more specific information be provided. Mr. Sokol
stated that a full draft plan would be provided in July, 1998.
Councilmember Lewis requested more comprehensive visioning for the
Downtown Plan. Mr. Krauss responded that the Downtown Plan is just one
component of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m.
Approved on the
day of ,1998.
Charles A. Booth, Mayor n am, City Clerk
f:%clerk\council%98M5-11