HomeMy WebLinkAbout3067
! r
ORDINANCE N0. 3 0 6 7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WRTER
RUNOFF POLICY IN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND REQUIRING THE SUBMISSION
OF ORAINAGE PLANS IN CONJUNCTION WITN LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS :
Section 1. PURPOSES. The City Council finds this Ordinance is necessary
in order to minimize water quality degredation by preventing the siltation of the
City's creeks, streams, rivers, lakes and other water bodies; to protect property
owners adjacent to developing land from increased and accelerating runoff rates
which would cause erosion or flooding of abutting property; to preserve capacity
of existing storm drainage system within developed areas; to promote sound de-
velopment policies which respect and preserve the City's water courses; to insure
the safety of City roads, street surfaces and rights of way; and to decrease
surface water damage to public and private property.
Section 2. DEFINITIONS.
(a) "Computations" shall mean calculations, including
coefficients and other pertinent data, made to determine the
drainage plan with rate of flow of water given in cubic feet
per second (cfs).
(b) "Department" shall mean the Department of Public Works.
(c) "Detention" refers to holding runoff for a short period
of time and then releasing it to the natural water course where it
returns to the hydrologic cycle.
(d) "Developmental coverage" shall mean all developed surface
areas within the subject property including, but not limited to,
rooftops, concrete or asphalt paved driveways, carports, accessory
buildings and parking areas.
(e) "Director" shall mean the Director Qf the Department of
Public Works.
Page One
Ordinance No. 3067
4-28-76 .
r
(f) "Drainage area" shall mean the watershed (acreage)
contributing surface water runoff to and including the subject
property.
(g) "Drainage plan" shall mean a plan for receiving, handling
and transporting surface water within the subject property.
(h) "Peak discharge" shall mean the maximum surface water
runoff rate (cfs) determined for the design storm frequency.
(i) "Receiving bodies of water" sha11 mean creeks, streams,
rivers, lakes, storm sewers and other bodies of water into which
surface waters are directed, either naturally or in manmade ditches
or open and closed systems.
(j) "Retention" refers to schemes whereby water is held for
a considerable length of time. The water may never be discharged
to a natural water course, but it may be consumed by plants, evapora-
tion or infiltration into the ground.
(k) "Storm sewer" shall mean a closed system utilized in
conveying storm water.
(1) "Subject property" shall mean the tract of land which is
the subject of the permit and/or approval action.
Section 3. SUBMISSION OF A DRAINAGE PLAN. All persons app1ying for any of
the following permits and/or approvals shall submit for approval a drainage plan
with their application and/or request:
(a) Grading Permit
(b) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (both inside and
outside Shorelines Boundary)
(c) Subdivision Approval
(d) Short Plat Approval, except where construction will be
residential
(e) Rezones
(1) If type of development is known or requested by
Public Works because of storm drainage deficiencies
in the area.
Page Two
Ordinance No. 3067
4-2$-76
a J
• 1
(2) zn the event the type of development is not know
at the time of the rezoning, the petitioner shall
be advised and furnished a copy of the requirements
of the Surface Water Runoff Policy.
(f) Special Property Use Permits
(g) Conditional Use Permits (if requested by Public Works because
of storm drainage deficiencies in the area).
(h) Building permits where the permit relates to 5,000 or more
square feet of development coverage within the property with
or without a surfaced or unsurfaced parking area.
(i) Surfaced or unsurfaced parking and outdoor storage areas not
in conjunction with building permit for a building or structure.
The plan submitted during one permit/approval process may be subsequently
submitted with further required applications. The plan shall be supplemented with
additional information at the request of the Department of Public Works.
The plan requirement established in this Sectian will not apply when the
department determines that the proposed permit and/or activity:
(a) Wi11 not seriously and adversely impact the water quality
conditions of any affected receiving bodies of water, and/or
(b) Will not alter the drainage patterns, increase the peak dis-
charge and cause any other adverse effects in the drainage area.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Regulations as adopted by
the City of Auburn shall be utilized in the design of the storm drainage system.
Section 4. CONTENTS OF A DRAINAGE PLAN. All persons applying for any
of the permits and/or approvals contained in Section 3 of this Ordinance shall
provide a drainage plan, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, for surface
water flows entering, flowing within and leaving the subject property. The detailed
form and contents of the drainage plan shall be described in procedures provided by
the department. The procedures will set forth the manner of presenting the following
required information:
Page Three
Ordinance No. 3067
4-28-76
' , .
(a) Background computations for sizing drainage facilities:
(1) Legal description of the permit area as
requested in Section 3 A-J with a contoured
topographical map, with acreage indicated and
existing storm drainage facilities in the im-
mediate vicinity of the improvement.
(2) Calculations of the peak discharge and amount
of surface water currently entering and leaving
the subject property in cubic feet per second.
These calculations should consider the entire
drainage basin.
(3) Calculations of the peak discharge and amount
of runoff which will be generated by a 25-year
storm within the subject property if development
is allowed to proceed.
(4) Determination of the peak discharge and amount
of water that will be generated by a 25-year storm
frequency at various points on the subject property.
(b) Proposed improvements for handling the computed runoff,
(1) Where open ditch construction is used to handle
drainage within the tract, a minimum of 15 feet
shall be provided between any structures and the
top of the bank of the defined channel. Maximum
allowable side slope 2:1.
(2) Where a closed system is used to handle drainage
within the tract, all structures shall be a minimum
of ten (10) feet from the closed system.
Section 5. DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ALL DRAINAGE PLANS.
(1) Surface water entering the subject property shall be received at
the natural1y occurring location and surface water exiting the subject property
Page Four
Ordinance No. 3067
4-28-76
.
shall be discharged at the natural location with adequate entegy dissipators
to control erosion and minimize downstream damage and with no diversion at any
of these points; and
(2) The peak discharge from the subject property may not be in-
creased due to the proposed development over the maximum peak discharge rate from
any of the preceding 3 years land uses; and
(3) Retention/detention facilities must be provided in order to
handle all surface water in excess of the peak discharge.
Exemptions from any or all of the foregoing requirements may be permitted
only after a determination by the department, employing the following criteria:
(a) Capacity of downstream facilities;
(b) Acceptability of receiving bodies of water;
(c) Possibility of adverse effects of retention.
Section 6. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLAN. All storm drainage plans
including calculations prepared in connection with any of the permits and/or
approvals listed in Section 3 shall be submitted for review and approval to the
Department of Public Works.
Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be
five (5) days after its enactment. Further, all plats receiving preliminary
approval subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance must comply with the
terms of the Ordinance. In the case of all additional actions enumerated in Section
3, the terms of this Ordinance will apply where final action by the City has not
been taken prior to the effective date of the Ordinance.
Section 8. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or its
application to any person or property is held invalid the remainder of the Ordinance
or the app1ication of the provision to cther persons or circumstances shall not be
effected.
Section 9. FEE SCHEDULE.
First Review
5 acres and under----------------------- $ 50.00
5- 20 acres---------------------------- 10.00 acre
Over 20 acre---------------------------- 200.00 minimun and
5.00 acre
In excess of 40 acres
Page Fiue
Ordinance No. 3067
. . m .
(Requirements of Sections 4 and 5 must be addressed)
Subsequent reviews 1/2 first review
(Failure to incorporate City of Auburn review comments
will be cause for return to applicant disapproved).
Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days
from and after its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law.
INTRODUCED: MAY 3, 1976
PASSED: MAY 3, 1976
APPROVED: MAY 3, 1976
~jET'O[r~
M A Y 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APOVED AS TO FORM:
w ;
E 1 "
1 ~ r ~v
City Attorney
PUBLISHED: MAY 7, 1976
Page Six and last
Ordinance No. 3067
4-28-76
q~ e~:~~~~~".~:.`t ~~'.~6Y'Rr.+~dY'+¢=~'►$~i~.`r~~' .s~";f k.' a c i ~ d ,~.ct'~,~ ~s t.,gr . 1 . , u~,~ ,~£i 4`[' yx ~ wfi~ v~e 1"~, ~ u A ~1'~,y S~ . i fa ~ i' ':t + y~; t
,
Mag 10, 1976
y
t.
.
.
m
TO: City' L`QUncilmen
FFtOM. 5tanley P. Kersey. Mayor
` k
. . . . ~r
5UBJECT; ` Qxciinance 3067 - Surface Water Runoff Policy
I am herewitl2 returning Ordinance 3067, "Suzface Water Runoff
Policy" to you with my veto. The reasans for'rrry ` veto axe as fol2ows:
Tha.s Ordinance has been discussed by the St.reet Cqnunittee
periodical.ly for appxox.zmately one year. Atna time du.ring this tiine
do I have the know.tea"ge that this proposal `has been discussed wa.th
persons whv might be affected by its passage.'
- This O,rdinance is similar to an Ordinanoe in King Cnunty. Mx: Lea
has stated that sma11 changes hatre been made` by the staff and 5'treet
Ccarrmeittee: These chanqes should be-Zooked at c.Zosely to deterntine
r,.
the effect that they mzght lzave upon the, City and/or the DeveZoper and ,
to ins ure their fairness and 'equ.i ty .
I am in support of the concept of th.zs 'ardinance, but helieve
that Ordinances sucla as this should be circulhted _prioz`` ta' passage,
xather than q:uickly advpting and -then considering ammendments. The O.rdinanloe
. gives no dixection to the process :in appeal.zrag decisiorzs nor ;capabilities `
of alternative act.ions which may be taken. Efforts shoul8 be maae ta
es tabli:nc capabili ties .far sma.Z.Z developments wi thout txeinendous
expense for compZicated data to meet neec3s of plans requzred.
4Sta!ey P Kersey, Mayor
'cc« G.Zobe News
Radio KA5Y , 5PKljo
: