HomeMy WebLinkAbout4875 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDINANCE NO. 4 8 7 5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 4840 PASSED MARCH 6, 1996, TO CORRECT A
SCRIVENER'S ERROR.
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4840, entitled 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CERTAIN SECTIONS OF TITLES 16 ENTITLED "ENVIRONMENT", 17
ENTITLED "SUBDIVISIONS" AND 18 ENTITLED "ZONING" OF THE AUBURN
CITY CODE AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE
HOUSE BILL (ESHB) 1724, AN ACT RELATING TO IMPLEMENTING THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON REGULATORY
REFORM, ON INTEGRATING GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW INCLUDING SOME ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS FOR
HOUSEKEEPING PURPOSES AND AMENDING SECTION 17.06.110 OF
CHAPTER 17.06 ENTITLED "PRELIMINARY PLAT" TO COMPLY WITH
REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 58.17.140." was passed March 6, 1996; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4840 contained a scrivener's error;
and
WHEREAS, the error needs to be corrected.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
~ection l. Auburn City Code Section 18.64.020(b) (3)
contained in Chapter 18.64 entitled "ADMINISTRATIVE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS" is amended to correct a scrivener's
Ordinance No. 4875
June 11, 1996
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
error as set forth on attached Exhibit "A" and is made a part
thereof as though set forth in full herein.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are declared
to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause,
sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this
ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the
remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its
application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 3. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
out the directions of this legislation.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
CHARLES A. BOOTH
MAYOR
Ordinance No. 4875
June 11, 1996
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ATTEST:
Robin Wohlhueter,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~nolds,
City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
Ordinance No. 4875
June 11, 1996
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. 4875
18.64.020 Process.
A. Conditional use permits:
1. A request for a conditional use permit shall be heard by
the Hearing Examiner in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 18.66. The Hearing Examiner shall make a
recommendation to the City Council.
B. Administrative use permits:
An administrative use permit is a process to allow certain
uses which require some review in order to properly site
them within the zone. It is intended to provide an
administrative process to provide an efficient review of
uses to ensure the use is compatible and consistent with
other existing and permitted uses in the zone. This
process shall only be used in those zones which
specifically allow administrative uses.
1. The Planning Director shall review and approve all
administrative uses. Upon receipt of a proper
application the Director shall within fifteen (15)
working days approve or deny the permit.
2. The Director's decision shall be forwarded to the
applicant and all property owners within two hundred
(200) feet of the proposed administrative use. Five (5)
public notices shall also be posted within 200 feet of
the proposal.
3. Any affected party may appeal the Planning Director's
decision to the Hearing Examiner. An appeal must be
filed within 14 ((~rking)) days of the date of mailing
of the Director's decision. Mailing of the notice shall
be by certified mail. The appeal shall be scheduled for
the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Hearing
Examiner, for which proper public notice can be provided.
The City shall extend the appeal period for an additional
seven days for administrative use permits that are
accompanied by a Final Mitigated Determination of Non-
Significance or Final EIS.
4. The appeal shall be processed the same as a conditional
use permit with the Hearing Examiner making a
recommendation to the City Council.
Exhibit UA"
Ordinance No. 4875
June 11, 1996
Page 4