Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4938Return Address: Auburn City Clerk City of Auburn 25 West Main St. Auburn, WA 98001 RECORDER'S COVER SHEET RECEIVED THIS DAY ~ bell 3 PH'97 '~'~'~ ~,i. J~TY ~ Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): 1. ORDINANCE NO. 4938 2. 3. 4. IReference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: []Additional reference #'s on page of document Grantor(s)lBorrower(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) 1.City of Auburn, a municipal Corp. 2. 3. 4. Grantee/Assignee/Beneficiary: (Last name first) 1 .Insurance Auto Auction 2. 3. 4. ILegal Description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, ran~ge) [] Additional legal is on page 1 8~ of document, Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 302105-9033 Fl Assessor Tax # not yet assigned 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDINAI~CE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING INSURANCE AUTO AUCTION FACILITY LOCATED IN THE 3300 BLOCK OF ~D" STREET SE ON PROPERTY ZONED M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL), WITHIN THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON. WHEREAS, Application No. ADM0004-95 dated December 12, 1995, together with site plans therefore, was submitted to the City of Auburn, Washington, by the INSURANCE AUTO AUCTION, requesting an Administrative Use Permit to allow for expansion of an existing facility onto adjacent parcels lying to the east and west side of ~D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington, hereinafter described in Section 2 of this Ordinance and WHEREAS, said request was approved by the Planning Director on June 11, 1996 and was subsequently appealed by neighboring property owners, and WHEREAS, said appeal above referred to, was referred to the Hearing Examiner for study and public hearing thereon; and Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, the Hearin9 Examiner, based upon staff review, held a public hearing on October 22, 1996 to consider said appeal in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, at the conclusion of which the Hearing Examiner recommended the approval of the issuance of an Administrative Use Permit to expand an existing facility onto adjacent parcels iying to the east and west side of "D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial); and WHEREAS, on November 4, 1996, the City Council of the City of Auburn considered the Hearing Examiner's recommendation and called for a closed record hearing; and WHEREAS, on November City of Auburn conducted a the Hearing Examiner's 18, 1996, the City Council of the closed record hearing and reviewed record including the Examiner's recommendation and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and thereafter rejected the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, and denied the application for an Administrative Use Permit. The Council further instructed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance, denying the application, to be Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 considered by the Council at a subsequent Council meeting, and, WHEREAS, the City Council on December 16, 1996, considered said ordinance and voted to not approve said ordinance, and WHEREAS, the City Council, on December 16, 1996, then reconsidered said request and then voted to affirm the Hearing Examiner's decision for the issuance of an Administrative Use Permit for expansion of an existing facility onto adjacent parcels lying to the east and west side of "D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington, based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions, to-wit: FINDINGS OF FACT The Insurance Auto Auction has requested an administrative use permit. The proposal would allow them to expand their existing facility onto adjacent parcels lying to the east and west sides of D Street SE within the 3300 block. The Planning Director approved the administrative use permit on June 11, 1996. The Planning Director's decision is final, subject to appeal. Prior to the expiration of the appeal period, three separate appeals were received. The appeals filed by the Fleck Company and Donald and Judie Olson were subsequently Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 settled and withdrawn from the agenda. Accordingly, the only remaining appeal is the appeal filed by Steven Allen, who indicated that he was a representative of himself and other interested neighbors. In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Section 18.64.020(B) (4), whenever an appeal is filed regarding the administrative use permit, the permit is then processed the same as a conditional use permit with the Hearing Examiner making a recommendation to City Council. The Insurance Auto Auction has requested an administrative use permit that would allow them to expand their existing facility onto adjacent parcels that lie on the east and west sides of ~D" Street SE in the 3300 block. The Insurance Auto Auction in 1993 ~eceived an administrative use permit (ADM0003-93) that allowed them to convert the Rohr plant, located at 3130 ~D" Street SE, into an auction facility for wrecked vehicles. The 1993 approval allowed for the use of the existing building on the site together with the storage of about 1,200 wrecked vehicles. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. The M-2 zone allows for auction houses subject to the issuance of an administrative use permit as well as outdoor storage is allowed within the M-2 zone. When the administrative use permit was approved previously, it was noted that any expansion of the facility would require another administrative use permit as well as an environmental review. Insurance Auto Auctions (IAA) is a company that serves the insurance and banking industry as a clearing house for vehicles. IAA collects vehicles for insurance carriers, lenders and other agencies. Those vehicles are evaluated and stored from one to four weeks at this facility until they are auctioned off at the site. About 95% of the vehicles sold at this facility are damaged in Ordlnan~e No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Pa~e 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 o varying degrees and are typically not remaining 5% are comprised of undamaged, thefts or Auburn dealer consignments. driveable. The intact recovered The current proposal would expand the existing facility by about 10 acres. Most of this would be paved and would accommodate the storage for another 1,600 vehicles. There are 2 parcels associated with the proposal. The first parcel lies immediately south of the existing facility and is 2.5 acres in size. This parcel abuts an existing mobile home park and therefor additional landscaping, berming and fencing should be required to buffer the existing residents. The second parcel lies to the southwest and is 7.87 acres in size. This parcel abuts mostly other industrial or heavy commercially zoned property with the exception of a multi-family zoned parcel that abuts the south property line. A duplex subdivision has been approved for this abutting parcel. The proposal also abuts UA" Street SE which is a major arterial. The second parcel should also provide additional landscaping, berming and fencing to buffer the duplex subdivision and the views from UA" Street SE. The auction is only open to licensed buyers and no public admittance is allowed. The licensed buyers consist of auto repair shops, auto recyclers, and parts pools. Auctions are held only on Wednesdays from 10:00 am to 1:30 p.m. Buyer attendance has averaged about 290 per sale. Auction business is operational only between 8:00 am and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays and is closed on weekends. About 15 to 20 vehicles are delivered to the facility by a towing subcontractor on weekends. The application indicates the auction facility currently employs 8 office staff and 5 storage yard workers. Two regional headquarters employees occupy the upstairs office space. An independent towing vendor with 3 employees occupies a small corner of the downstairs office area. No new employees are anticipated to be hired as a result of the construction of the new storage Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 4 9. 5 areas. The application also indicates that the operations involve no auto repairs, part sales or dismantlin9. An evaluation of the project's vehicle trips was conducted to identify potential transportation impacts. The results are documented in the report: "Traffic Conditions Analysis Insurance Auto Auction', prepared by Transportation Consultin9 Northwest in December 1995. The report describes the current operation as consistin~ of a live auction conducted weekly on Wedn~sdays. The day before is used by potential buyers to preview vehicles to be sold the followin9 day. Sold vehicles may be transported off-site the day of the sale or the followin9 day dependin~ on the number of vehicles purchased and condition of the vehicles. Vehicles may be either be driven away under their own power, towed individually or carried on a multiple vehicle transport. The report also identifies that an agreement with the adjacent church allows the use of the church parkinw lot for customer parkin9 on auction days. The report identifies that since establishment of the auto auction use at this location and approval of the administrative use permit, Insurance Auto Auction has leased and utilized a seven-acre off-site storage yard to accommodate in increase in the level of business activity. Vehicles accepted by Insurance Auto Auction are first checked in for appraisal by insurance company representatives. Then the vehicles are either stored on- site or transported to the company's remote storage yard. Vehicles are not sold from the remote storage yard but are transported back to the site for sale as space is available. Thus a vehicle may be transported to and from the site four times to complete the transaction. Accordin9 to the report the expansion is sought to eliminate the transfer of vehicles between the site and the off-site storage yard. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 The existin9 vehicle trips to the site are characterized by different classes of vehicles. Counts were conducted over three days (Tuesday through Thursday) to assess the number of vehicle trips associated with current operations. The number of passenger vehicles representing employees and customers, delivery and service trucks, off-site storage yard trips, and small and larger tow truck trips were counted. The report shows that the total number of trips varied between 236 and 660 with an average or 426 trips per day. Based on information in the report, the expansion of the site would allow the consolidation of the auto storage facilities and eliminate the need for off-site storage and the associated transfer of overflow w~hicles thus reducing trips associated with the current operations. The consolidation is expected to reduce the number of trips by an average of 19 truck trips per off site haulin~ day. Vehicles are not delivered to the main site from the off-site storage yard on auction day's. Since accordin9 to the report, the proposed expansion will decrease the number of vehicle trips no traffic impacts beyond the current operations are expected beyond the amount which was previously identified by the applicant in the administrative use permit application or which was relied upon by the City for issuance of the permit. The application identified the facility would have 15 employees representing approximately 30 trips and 30 trips associated with the use of car haulers to and from the site. The application indicated that vehicles would be transported to and from the site exclusively by the use of car haulers which is contradicted by information provided about current operations. The analysis also fails to take into account that the proposed expansion of 10.3 acres is lar~er than the 7- acre off-site storage facility. Thus, tlhe proposed expansion will provide additional storage space beyond Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 10. 11. what is currently available and thus result in additional vehicle trips. The proposed storage yard expansion is proposed in the vicinity of a future roadway connection between the current termini of D Street SE. Other projects in the vicinity have recently completed portions of this street. A residential subdivision is currently completing D Street SE north to the south property line of the current proposal. The only portion remaining to provide this connection is the 329.5 foot segment through' the subject property. When available, this connection would provide an alternative north south route extending from 41st Street SE to 29th Street SE. The availability of this connection is important to elimination of existing nonconforming cul-de-sacs and improvement; of local circulation. A 30-foot easement for roadway purposes currently exists through the site. The existing operation that was approved in 1993 has been operating inconsistently with what the previous applicant had indicated would be the case. In particular, the number of inoperable cars is much greater than what the applicant indicated. This has resulted in the storage yard looking more like a wrecking yard with indiscriminate storing of the vehicles. Wrecked cars have also been trucked in from an off-site lot for the auctions, and parking for those attending the auctions has not been provided on site. Complaints have been received from neighbors primarily due to noise, traffic, parking and visual impacts These issues wil~L need to be addressed and corrected as part of receiving any approval for expanding the facility. The City has also completed a comprehensive environmental review of the proposal. This has resulted in the issuance of a Final Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance (File No. SEP0009-95) which contains 11 conditions concerning storm drainage, erosion control, landscaping and lighting. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 12. 13. 14. There are a number of Comprehensive Plan policies which apply to the administrative use ~ermit. Specifically, Policy LU-113, ACP, requires that heavy industrial uses should be separated from lighter industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The City is required to seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitants to harmful effects of excessive noise in Policy EN-38, ACP. An efficient collector system should seek to spread the opportunity for movement over alternative routes rather than directing traffic to a few collectors. Also, ample alternatives should exist for emergency vehicles to access areas to facilitate movement of police patrols and fire emergency vehicles. All developed areas shall be served by at least two accesses. This is Policy TR-13, ACP. There are also a number of other access policies contained in the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The primary substantive issues raised in the appeal include the extension of D Street SE, additional traffic, viewing of the wrecked vehicles, leakage of gasses, oils, and anti-freeze, noise, sufficient landscaping concerns, storm drainage, and water quality. The evidence establishes that a thorough and comprehensive environmental review was completed as part of the permit process. As part of the review, a traffic study was required. As with all new projects, additional traffic is projected. The amount of additional traffic, however, is not significant to require any mitigation measures. The appellant did not provide any information prepared by a professional traffic engineer which would change the findings of the applicant's traffic engineer or the conclusions reached by the City Traffic Engineer. In fact, it appears as though the traffic may actually be reduced as a result of the applicant's stated intention to store additional vehicles on site as a result of the expansion as opposed to trucking the vehicles from an off site storage facility. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 15. 16. The proposed link of D Street is a lon9 standin9 practice and an adopted policy of the City to require through streets whenever possible. The link of D Street would complete the right-of-way from 41st Street SE to 29th Street SE. One of the appealing parties is proposing that all Insurance Auto Auction traffic enter and exit a new entrance from A Street to prohibit Auto Auction traffic from using routes affecting residents that are at or near D Street. Traffic is now planned to use the intersection of 29th and A Street to access A Street. This is a controlled intersection with futurE~ plans for a traffic signal. As a result of the fact that; A Street is a five lane arterial, the Traffic Engineers conclude it would be better from a traffic safety standpoint to allow traffic to use the 29th and A Street intersection as opposed to one controlled driveway. However, at the time of the public hearing, the applicant indicated a willingness to place a sign indicating "right turn only" at the exit onto 31st Street. Another part of the environmental review provided for a comprehensive review and approval process for storm drainage and water quality. Coinciding with submittal of plans for the project's permanent storm drainage facilities, the applicant must submit documentation outlining proposed pollution prevention and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) to the City Public Works Department for review and approval. The storm water treatment facility design and construction shall be in accordance with criteria outlined in the Washington State Department of Ecology Storm water Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992). In addition, a water quality monitoring program must be required to assess and report on the treatment efficiency of the proposed systems for removal of petroleum hydrocarbon and heavy metals. The Plan shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of any construction permits. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 At the time plans are submitted for the project's permanent storm drainage facilities, an operation and maintenance schedule for all storm water facilities and the implementation of BMPs, including the responsible party, shall be provided. Approval of the schedule is required prior to issuance of buildin9 permits. Pollution prevention BMPs shall be in accordance with criteria outlined in the Washington State DepartmenL of Ecology Storm water Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992). 17. 18. 19. The proponent shall provide the City with an inspection and maintenance easement for the site's storm drainage facilities. The easement shall be prepared and submitted to the City in a format suitable for recordin~ prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. The appellants did not provide any information that would indicate that what is planned for storm drainage and water quality of this project would not be adequate. Concerning landscaping, the Mitigated Determination of Non Significance already requires landscaping beyond standards of the Zoning Code to help visually screen the wrecked vehicles from less intensive adjacent zoning. Stacking of vehicles is prohibited. Concerning noise, this project, as well as other adjoining industrial property, is required to comply with State wide noise regulations. No information has been provided indicatin~ that the operation of the proposal would violate State noise standards. This property, as well as surrounding properties, contains M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning. This heavy industrial zoning has been established on this property for over 30 years. The M-2 zone is the City's least restrictive zoning classification allowing for a wide range of uses including outdoor storage and processing. The M-2 zone allows for junkyards, as defined by various Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Pa~e 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 20. sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Storage of wrecked cars is an outright use permitted in the M-2 zone. The City could not review the project or require an administrative use permit, but for the requirement that cars are auctioned on the site. As previously indicated, storage of wrecked cars is permitted as an outright use. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW o There are a number of criteria required an administrative use permit can be granted. The first criteria is that the use will have no more of an adverse effect on the health, safety, or comfort of persons living or working in the area, and. will be no more injurious, economically or otherwise, to property or improvements in the surrounding area, than would any use generally permitted in the district. The use has the potential to be an adverse impact if appropriate conditions of approval are not required and implemented. These conditions provide additional measures to protect the residential zoned areas and lessen the visual impacts associated with this use. The proposal must be in compliance with the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal can be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan subject to the implementation of additional measures to address impacts which may occur to the residential neighborhood as well as address the need to provide for adequate access through streets. The proposal complies with the requirements of the Zoning Code in that auction facilities and outdoor storage uses are permitted within the M-2, Heavy Industrial, zone. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 6 o 7 o The proposal can be conducted and maintained, so as to be harmonious and appropriate in design, character, and appearance with the existin9 or intended character of the general vicinity. To be harmonious, substantial landscapinH and other bufferinH will be requ!Lred. The proposal will not adversely affect the public infrastructure as long as appropriate measures are required to provide for the completion of D Street. The appellant did not provide any relevant expert evidence which would indicate that traffic, storm drainage, water quality, or noise will be an impact beyond which is expected from the M-2, Meavy Industrial zoned property or violate any City standard or policy. The subject property has been zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, for three decades and the M-2 zone is the least restrictive zonin9 classification. For each of the above referenced reasons, the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to the Auburn City Council on this Administrative Use Permit to allow for expansion of an existin9 facility onto adjacent parcels lyin9 to the east and west side of nD" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington is affirmed. NOW, TMEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASMINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ~'~ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ~ The above cited Hearin9 Examiner's Findings of Fact and Conclusions, are herewith incorporated in this Ordinance. ~ An Administrative Use Permit is hereby approved to allow for expansion of an existing facility onto adjacent parcels lying to the east and west side 0f "D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington, legally described on attached Exhibit "A" and made a part thereof as though set forth in full herein. ~ The Administrative Use Permit approved subject to the following conditions: is hereby All landscaped areas required by the Zoning Code for the 2 proposed parcels shall contain a landscaped berm as required by Section 18.50.060 (N) of the Zoning Code. For the 30 foot wide landscaped areas, the height of the berm shall be a minimum of 4 feet and shall have a flat crown that is at least four feet in width. The design of the berms may be modified to accommodate the retention of existing significant trees. The outdoor storage areas, of all parcels includin9 the previous approval, shall be delineated, e.g. striped, to show the location of the wrecked vehicles. Appropriate driveways shall be provided that are adequate for emergency vehicles and the operational machinery. The number of vehicles stored at the existing facility shall Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 14 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3. 4. 5. 6. ?. not exceed 1200. The number of vehicles stored at the proposed storage areas shall not exceed 16.90. Wrecked vehicles and others awaiting auction shall not be stored in any other location except within the delineated areas. There shall be no vehicles auctioned at the site other than those which are stored at the facility. Parking for the employees and those attending the auctions shall be provided on site. There shall be no multi-stacking of vehicle~ allowed at either the existing site or at the proposed storage areas. Any entrance gates at either the existing site or at the proposed storage areas shall be screened with sight obscuring material. The existing outdoor public address system shall be arranged such that its impact is minimized for the existing and future residents of the: adjoining residentially zoned areas. The applicant is required to dedicate adequate right of way (60 ft.) and improve ~D" Street SE to a 44 foot wide street section along the frontage of the project site. A deferment (street delay) o~ the improvements may be requested from the City Engineer. The deferment, if approved, must be secured prior to any permits being approved for the two proposed storage areas. The applicant shall submit a plan to the Planning Director that addresses compliance with cond[itions # 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10 and 11. The plans must be approved by the Planning Director prior to any permits bein~ approved for the two proposed storage areas. There shall be no repair, dismantling or sales of parts of any vehicle at either the existing or proposed facilities. Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~) 13 ~ 14 ~[~ 15 ~.~ 16 [~ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10. 11. Ail vehicles that are purchased at the auction are only allowed to leave the site on a licensed vehicle carrier or be legal to drive on public roads. A staging area shall be provided for on site for vehicles that are waiting to be hauled away. To preclude patron parking in the residential neighborhood, on auction days, there shall be no walk in traffic allowed except through the "A" Street SE entrance. 12. 13. The Insurance Auto Auction has agreed to install and shall install a "right turn only" sign at its existing exit onto D Street at 31st Street Subsequent to the establishment of the new area covered by this administrative use permit, the applicant shall terminate its lease for the off site storage space at the termination of the lease period and no wrecked vehicles shall be stored off site subsequent to the termination of the lease. this Ordinance of Auburn office of Upon the passage, approval and publication of as provided by law, the City Clerk of the City shall cause this Ordinance to be recc. rded in the the King County Auditor. ~ The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Ordinance No. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 ~ This Ordinance shall force five days from and after its publication as provided by law. ATTEST: Robin Wohlhueter, City Clerk 19 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 20 22 Michael J. Reynolds, 23 City Attorney 24 PUBLISHED: INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: 25 26 Ordinance NO. 4938 January 2, 1997 Page 17 take effect and be in passage, approval and CHARLES A. BOOTH MAYOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARIER OF SECllON 30, IOWNSHtP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. PARCEL B LOT 2 OF CITY OF AUBURN SHORT PLAT NUMBER SP-13-76, REVISION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7812050719, BEING A CORRECTION OF SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 7808130588 AND 7807110287, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUAR1ER OF THE' NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECllON 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST WILLAMEITE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY 3.31 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 101.55 FEET OF SAID LOT ~' TOGETHER Willt THE NORTHERLY 12 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 28 FEET OF LOT I OF CITY OF AUBURN SHORT PLAT NUMBER SP-14-78, REVISION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8009290574, BEING A CORRECllON OF SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7807100253. SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORllON OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF' THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 3 OF THE CITY OF AUBURN LOOT UNE ADJUSTMEN~ NUMBER LLA-20-85, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8701280787: PARCEL C: THE NORTH 9 ACRES OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN SECIlON 30. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE BEING ESTABLISHED BY AGREEMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 1926 UNDER64883: RECORDING NdMBER 2164883: EXCERT THE NORTH 120 FEET OF THE WEST 363 FEET THEREOF: AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR 84TH AVE. SOUTH ('A" STREET S Ordinance No. 4938 Exhibit "A"