HomeMy WebLinkAbout4938Return Address:
Auburn City Clerk
City of Auburn
25 West Main St.
Auburn, WA 98001
RECORDER'S COVER SHEET
RECEIVED THIS DAY ~
bell 3 PH'97
'~'~'~ ~,i. J~TY ~
Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein):
1. ORDINANCE NO. 4938
2.
3.
4.
IReference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:
[]Additional reference #'s on page of document
Grantor(s)lBorrower(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials)
1.City of Auburn, a municipal Corp.
2.
3.
4.
Grantee/Assignee/Beneficiary: (Last name first)
1 .Insurance Auto Auction
2.
3.
4.
ILegal Description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, ran~ge)
[] Additional legal is on page 1 8~ of document,
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number
302105-9033
Fl Assessor Tax # not yet assigned
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDINAI~CE NO. ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR
AN ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR EXPANSION OF THE
EXISTING INSURANCE AUTO AUCTION FACILITY LOCATED IN THE 3300
BLOCK OF ~D" STREET SE ON PROPERTY ZONED M-2 (HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL), WITHIN THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, Application No. ADM0004-95 dated December 12,
1995, together with site plans therefore, was submitted to the
City of Auburn, Washington, by the INSURANCE AUTO AUCTION,
requesting an Administrative Use Permit to allow for expansion
of an existing facility onto adjacent parcels lying to the
east and west side of ~D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on
property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the City of
Auburn, Washington, hereinafter described in Section 2 of this
Ordinance and
WHEREAS, said request was approved by the Planning
Director on June 11, 1996 and was subsequently appealed by
neighboring property owners, and
WHEREAS, said appeal above referred to, was referred to
the Hearing Examiner for study and public hearing thereon; and
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
WHEREAS, the Hearin9 Examiner, based upon staff review,
held a public hearing on October 22, 1996 to consider said
appeal in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, at the
conclusion of which the Hearing Examiner recommended the
approval of the issuance of an Administrative Use Permit to
expand an existing facility onto adjacent parcels iying to the
east and west side of "D" Street SE, within the 3300 block, on
property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial); and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1996, the City Council of the
City of Auburn considered the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation and called for a closed record hearing; and
WHEREAS, on November
City of Auburn conducted a
the Hearing Examiner's
18, 1996, the City Council of the
closed record hearing and reviewed
record including the Examiner's
recommendation and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and
thereafter rejected the recommendation of the Hearing
Examiner, and denied the application for an Administrative Use
Permit. The Council further instructed the City Attorney to
prepare an ordinance, denying the application, to be
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
considered by the Council at a subsequent Council meeting,
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council on December 16, 1996,
considered said ordinance and voted to not approve said
ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council, on December 16, 1996, then
reconsidered said request and then voted to affirm the Hearing
Examiner's decision for the issuance of an Administrative Use
Permit for expansion of an existing facility onto adjacent
parcels lying to the east and west side of "D" Street SE,
within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy
Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington, based upon
the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions, to-wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Insurance Auto Auction has requested an
administrative use permit. The proposal would allow them
to expand their existing facility onto adjacent parcels
lying to the east and west sides of D Street SE within
the 3300 block. The Planning Director approved the
administrative use permit on June 11, 1996. The Planning
Director's decision is final, subject to appeal. Prior
to the expiration of the appeal period, three separate
appeals were received. The appeals filed by the Fleck
Company and Donald and Judie Olson were subsequently
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
settled and withdrawn from the agenda. Accordingly, the
only remaining appeal is the appeal filed by Steven
Allen, who indicated that he was a representative of
himself and other interested neighbors.
In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Section
18.64.020(B) (4), whenever an appeal is filed regarding
the administrative use permit, the permit is then
processed the same as a conditional use permit with the
Hearing Examiner making a recommendation to City Council.
The Insurance Auto Auction has requested an
administrative use permit that would allow them to expand
their existing facility onto adjacent parcels that lie on
the east and west sides of ~D" Street SE in the 3300
block.
The Insurance Auto Auction in 1993 ~eceived an
administrative use permit (ADM0003-93) that allowed them
to convert the Rohr plant, located at 3130 ~D" Street SE,
into an auction facility for wrecked vehicles. The 1993
approval allowed for the use of the existing building on
the site together with the storage of about 1,200 wrecked
vehicles. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial.
The M-2 zone allows for auction houses subject to the
issuance of an administrative use permit as well as
outdoor storage is allowed within the M-2 zone.
When the administrative use permit was approved
previously, it was noted that any expansion of the
facility would require another administrative use permit
as well as an environmental review.
Insurance Auto Auctions (IAA) is a company that serves
the insurance and banking industry as a clearing house
for vehicles. IAA collects vehicles for insurance
carriers, lenders and other agencies. Those vehicles are
evaluated and stored from one to four weeks at this
facility until they are auctioned off at the site. About
95% of the vehicles sold at this facility are damaged in
Ordlnan~e No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Pa~e 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
o
varying degrees and are typically not
remaining 5% are comprised of undamaged,
thefts or Auburn dealer consignments.
driveable. The
intact recovered
The current proposal would expand the existing facility
by about 10 acres. Most of this would be paved and would
accommodate the storage for another 1,600 vehicles.
There are 2 parcels associated with the proposal. The
first parcel lies immediately south of the existing
facility and is 2.5 acres in size. This parcel abuts an
existing mobile home park and therefor additional
landscaping, berming and fencing should be required to
buffer the existing residents. The second parcel lies to
the southwest and is 7.87 acres in size. This parcel
abuts mostly other industrial or heavy commercially zoned
property with the exception of a multi-family zoned
parcel that abuts the south property line. A duplex
subdivision has been approved for this abutting parcel.
The proposal also abuts UA" Street SE which is a major
arterial. The second parcel should also provide
additional landscaping, berming and fencing to buffer the
duplex subdivision and the views from UA" Street SE.
The auction is only open to licensed buyers and no public
admittance is allowed. The licensed buyers consist of
auto repair shops, auto recyclers, and parts pools.
Auctions are held only on Wednesdays from 10:00 am to
1:30 p.m. Buyer attendance has averaged about 290 per
sale. Auction business is operational only between 8:00
am and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays and is closed on weekends.
About 15 to 20 vehicles are delivered to the facility by
a towing subcontractor on weekends.
The application indicates the auction facility currently
employs 8 office staff and 5 storage yard workers. Two
regional headquarters employees occupy the upstairs
office space. An independent towing vendor with 3
employees occupies a small corner of the downstairs
office area. No new employees are anticipated to be
hired as a result of the construction of the new storage
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
3
4 9.
5
areas. The application also indicates that the
operations involve no auto repairs, part sales or
dismantlin9.
An evaluation of the project's vehicle trips was
conducted to identify potential transportation impacts.
The results are documented in the report: "Traffic
Conditions Analysis Insurance Auto Auction', prepared by
Transportation Consultin9 Northwest in December 1995.
The report describes the current operation as consistin~
of a live auction conducted weekly on Wedn~sdays. The
day before is used by potential buyers to preview
vehicles to be sold the followin9 day. Sold vehicles may
be transported off-site the day of the sale or the
followin9 day dependin~ on the number of vehicles
purchased and condition of the vehicles. Vehicles may be
either be driven away under their own power, towed
individually or carried on a multiple vehicle transport.
The report also identifies that an agreement with the
adjacent church allows the use of the church parkinw lot
for customer parkin9 on auction days.
The report identifies that since establishment of the
auto auction use at this location and approval of the
administrative use permit, Insurance Auto Auction has
leased and utilized a seven-acre off-site storage yard to
accommodate in increase in the level of business
activity.
Vehicles accepted by Insurance Auto Auction are first
checked in for appraisal by insurance company
representatives. Then the vehicles are either stored on-
site or transported to the company's remote storage yard.
Vehicles are not sold from the remote storage yard but
are transported back to the site for sale as space is
available. Thus a vehicle may be transported to and from
the site four times to complete the transaction.
Accordin9 to the report the expansion is sought to
eliminate the transfer of vehicles between the site and
the off-site storage yard.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
i1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
The existin9 vehicle trips to the site are characterized
by different classes of vehicles. Counts were conducted
over three days (Tuesday through Thursday) to assess the
number of vehicle trips associated with current
operations. The number of passenger vehicles
representing employees and customers, delivery and
service trucks, off-site storage yard trips, and small
and larger tow truck trips were counted. The report
shows that the total number of trips varied between 236
and 660 with an average or 426 trips per day.
Based on information in the report, the expansion of the
site would allow the consolidation of the auto storage
facilities and eliminate the need for off-site storage
and the associated transfer of overflow w~hicles thus
reducing trips associated with the current operations.
The consolidation is expected to reduce the number of
trips by an average of 19 truck trips per off site
haulin~ day. Vehicles are not delivered to the main site
from the off-site storage yard on auction day's.
Since accordin9 to the report, the proposed expansion
will decrease the number of vehicle trips no traffic
impacts beyond the current operations are expected beyond
the amount which was previously identified by the
applicant in the administrative use permit application or
which was relied upon by the City for issuance of the
permit. The application identified the facility would
have 15 employees representing approximately 30 trips and
30 trips associated with the use of car haulers to and
from the site. The application indicated that vehicles
would be transported to and from the site exclusively by
the use of car haulers which is contradicted by
information provided about current operations. The
analysis also fails to take into account that the
proposed expansion of 10.3 acres is lar~er than the 7-
acre off-site storage facility. Thus, tlhe proposed
expansion will provide additional storage space beyond
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
10.
11.
what is currently available and thus result in additional
vehicle trips.
The proposed storage yard expansion is proposed in the
vicinity of a future roadway connection between the
current termini of D Street SE. Other projects in the
vicinity have recently completed portions of this street.
A residential subdivision is currently completing D
Street SE north to the south property line of the current
proposal. The only portion remaining to provide this
connection is the 329.5 foot segment through' the subject
property. When available, this connection would provide
an alternative north south route extending from 41st
Street SE to 29th Street SE. The availability of this
connection is important to elimination of existing
nonconforming cul-de-sacs and improvement; of local
circulation. A 30-foot easement for roadway purposes
currently exists through the site.
The existing operation that was approved in 1993 has been
operating inconsistently with what the previous applicant
had indicated would be the case. In particular, the
number of inoperable cars is much greater than what the
applicant indicated. This has resulted in the storage
yard looking more like a wrecking yard with
indiscriminate storing of the vehicles. Wrecked cars
have also been trucked in from an off-site lot for the
auctions, and parking for those attending the auctions
has not been provided on site. Complaints have been
received from neighbors primarily due to noise, traffic,
parking and visual impacts These issues wil~L need to be
addressed and corrected as part of receiving any approval
for expanding the facility.
The City has also completed a comprehensive environmental
review of the proposal. This has resulted in the
issuance of a Final Mitigated Determination of Non-
Significance (File No. SEP0009-95) which contains 11
conditions concerning storm drainage, erosion control,
landscaping and lighting.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
12.
13.
14.
There are a number of Comprehensive Plan policies which
apply to the administrative use ~ermit. Specifically,
Policy LU-113, ACP, requires that heavy industrial uses
should be separated from lighter industrial, commercial,
and residential uses. The City is required to seek to
minimize the exposure of area inhabitants to harmful
effects of excessive noise in Policy EN-38, ACP. An
efficient collector system should seek to spread the
opportunity for movement over alternative routes rather
than directing traffic to a few collectors. Also, ample
alternatives should exist for emergency vehicles to
access areas to facilitate movement of police patrols and
fire emergency vehicles. All developed areas shall be
served by at least two accesses. This is Policy TR-13,
ACP. There are also a number of other access policies
contained in the Auburn Comprehensive Plan.
The primary substantive issues raised in the appeal
include the extension of D Street SE, additional traffic,
viewing of the wrecked vehicles, leakage of gasses, oils,
and anti-freeze, noise, sufficient landscaping concerns,
storm drainage, and water quality.
The evidence establishes that a thorough and
comprehensive environmental review was completed as part
of the permit process. As part of the review, a traffic
study was required. As with all new projects, additional
traffic is projected. The amount of additional traffic,
however, is not significant to require any mitigation
measures. The appellant did not provide any information
prepared by a professional traffic engineer which would
change the findings of the applicant's traffic engineer
or the conclusions reached by the City Traffic Engineer.
In fact, it appears as though the traffic may actually be
reduced as a result of the applicant's stated intention
to store additional vehicles on site as a result of the
expansion as opposed to trucking the vehicles from an off
site storage facility.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
15.
16.
The proposed link of D Street is a lon9 standin9 practice
and an adopted policy of the City to require through
streets whenever possible. The link of D Street would
complete the right-of-way from 41st Street SE to 29th
Street SE. One of the appealing parties is proposing
that all Insurance Auto Auction traffic enter and exit a
new entrance from A Street to prohibit Auto Auction
traffic from using routes affecting residents that are at
or near D Street. Traffic is now planned to use the
intersection of 29th and A Street to access A Street.
This is a controlled intersection with futurE~ plans for a
traffic signal. As a result of the fact that; A Street is
a five lane arterial, the Traffic Engineers conclude it
would be better from a traffic safety standpoint to allow
traffic to use the 29th and A Street intersection as
opposed to one controlled driveway. However, at the time
of the public hearing, the applicant indicated a
willingness to place a sign indicating "right turn only"
at the exit onto 31st Street.
Another part of the environmental review provided for a
comprehensive review and approval process for storm
drainage and water quality. Coinciding with submittal of
plans for the project's permanent storm drainage
facilities, the applicant must submit documentation
outlining proposed pollution prevention and storm water
treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) to the City
Public Works Department for review and approval. The
storm water treatment facility design and construction
shall be in accordance with criteria outlined in the
Washington State Department of Ecology Storm water
Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992). In
addition, a water quality monitoring program must be
required to assess and report on the treatment efficiency
of the proposed systems for removal of petroleum
hydrocarbon and heavy metals. The Plan shall be prepared
and submitted for review and approval prior to issuance
of any construction permits.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
At the time plans are submitted for the project's
permanent storm drainage facilities, an operation and
maintenance schedule for all storm water facilities and
the implementation of BMPs, including the responsible
party, shall be provided. Approval of the schedule is
required prior to issuance of buildin9 permits. Pollution
prevention BMPs shall be in accordance with criteria
outlined in the Washington State DepartmenL of Ecology
Storm water Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin
(1992).
17.
18.
19.
The proponent shall provide the City with an inspection
and maintenance easement for the site's storm drainage
facilities. The easement shall be prepared and submitted
to the City in a format suitable for recordin~ prior to
the issuance of occupancy permits.
The appellants did not provide any information that would
indicate that what is planned for storm drainage and
water quality of this project would not be adequate.
Concerning landscaping, the Mitigated Determination of
Non Significance already requires landscaping beyond
standards of the Zoning Code to help visually screen the
wrecked vehicles from less intensive adjacent zoning.
Stacking of vehicles is prohibited.
Concerning noise, this project, as well as other
adjoining industrial property, is required to comply with
State wide noise regulations. No information has been
provided indicatin~ that the operation of the proposal
would violate State noise standards.
This property, as well as surrounding properties,
contains M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning. This heavy
industrial zoning has been established on this property
for over 30 years. The M-2 zone is the City's least
restrictive zoning classification allowing for a wide
range of uses including outdoor storage and processing.
The M-2 zone allows for junkyards, as defined by various
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Pa~e 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
20.
sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Storage of wrecked
cars is an outright use permitted in the M-2 zone.
The City could not review the project or require an
administrative use permit, but for the requirement that
cars are auctioned on the site. As previously indicated,
storage of wrecked cars is permitted as an outright use.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
o
There are a number of criteria required an administrative
use permit can be granted.
The first criteria is that the use will have no more of
an adverse effect on the health, safety, or comfort of
persons living or working in the area, and. will be no
more injurious, economically or otherwise, to property or
improvements in the surrounding area, than would any use
generally permitted in the district. The use has the
potential to be an adverse impact if appropriate
conditions of approval are not required and implemented.
These conditions provide additional measures to protect
the residential zoned areas and lessen the visual impacts
associated with this use.
The proposal must be in compliance with the goals,
policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The
proposal can be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan
subject to the implementation of additional measures to
address impacts which may occur to the residential
neighborhood as well as address the need to provide for
adequate access through streets.
The proposal complies with the requirements of the Zoning
Code in that auction facilities and outdoor storage uses
are permitted within the M-2, Heavy Industrial, zone.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
6 o
7 o
The proposal can be conducted and maintained, so as to be
harmonious and appropriate in design, character, and
appearance with the existin9 or intended character of the
general vicinity. To be harmonious, substantial
landscapinH and other bufferinH will be requ!Lred.
The proposal will not adversely affect the public
infrastructure as long as appropriate measures are
required to provide for the completion of D Street.
The appellant did not provide any relevant expert
evidence which would indicate that traffic, storm
drainage, water quality, or noise will be an impact
beyond which is expected from the M-2, Meavy Industrial
zoned property or violate any City standard or policy.
The subject property has been zoned M-2, Heavy
Industrial, for three decades and the M-2 zone is the
least restrictive zonin9 classification.
For each of the above referenced reasons, the
recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to the Auburn City
Council on this Administrative Use Permit to allow for
expansion of an existin9 facility onto adjacent parcels lyin9
to the east and west side of nD" Street SE, within the 3300
block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) within the
City of Auburn, Washington is affirmed.
NOW, TMEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASMINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
~'~ 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
~ The above cited Hearin9 Examiner's Findings
of Fact and Conclusions, are herewith incorporated in this
Ordinance.
~ An Administrative Use Permit is hereby
approved to allow for expansion of an existing facility onto
adjacent parcels lying to the east and west side 0f "D" Street
SE, within the 3300 block, on property zoned M-2 (Heavy
Industrial) within the City of Auburn, Washington, legally
described on attached Exhibit "A" and made a part thereof as
though set forth in full herein.
~ The Administrative Use Permit
approved subject to the following conditions:
is hereby
All landscaped areas required by the Zoning Code for the
2 proposed parcels shall contain a landscaped berm as
required by Section 18.50.060 (N) of the Zoning Code.
For the 30 foot wide landscaped areas, the height of the
berm shall be a minimum of 4 feet and shall have a flat
crown that is at least four feet in width. The design of
the berms may be modified to accommodate the retention of
existing significant trees.
The outdoor storage areas, of all parcels includin9 the
previous approval, shall be delineated, e.g. striped, to
show the location of the wrecked vehicles. Appropriate
driveways shall be provided that are adequate for
emergency vehicles and the operational machinery. The
number of vehicles stored at the existing facility shall
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 14
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
?.
not exceed 1200. The number of vehicles stored at the
proposed storage areas shall not exceed 16.90. Wrecked
vehicles and others awaiting auction shall not be stored
in any other location except within the delineated areas.
There shall be no vehicles auctioned at the site other
than those which are stored at the facility.
Parking for the employees and those attending the
auctions shall be provided on site.
There shall be no multi-stacking of vehicle~ allowed at
either the existing site or at the proposed storage
areas.
Any entrance gates at either the existing site or at the
proposed storage areas shall be screened with sight
obscuring material.
The existing outdoor public address system shall be
arranged such that its impact is minimized for the
existing and future residents of the: adjoining
residentially zoned areas.
The applicant is required to dedicate adequate right of
way (60 ft.) and improve ~D" Street SE to a 44 foot wide
street section along the frontage of the project site. A
deferment (street delay) o~ the improvements may be
requested from the City Engineer. The deferment, if
approved, must be secured prior to any permits being
approved for the two proposed storage areas.
The applicant shall submit a plan to the Planning
Director that addresses compliance with cond[itions # 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 10 and 11. The plans must be approved by the
Planning Director prior to any permits bein~ approved for
the two proposed storage areas.
There shall be no repair, dismantling or sales of parts
of any vehicle at either the existing or proposed
facilities.
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
~) 13
~ 14
~[~ 15
~.~ 16
[~ 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
10.
11.
Ail vehicles that are purchased at the auction are only
allowed to leave the site on a licensed vehicle carrier
or be legal to drive on public roads. A staging area
shall be provided for on site for vehicles that are
waiting to be hauled away.
To preclude patron parking in the residential
neighborhood, on auction days, there shall be no walk in
traffic allowed except through the "A" Street SE
entrance.
12.
13.
The Insurance Auto Auction has agreed to install and
shall install a "right turn only" sign at its existing
exit onto D Street at 31st Street
Subsequent to the establishment of the new area covered
by this administrative use permit, the applicant shall
terminate its lease for the off site storage space at the
termination of the lease period and no wrecked vehicles
shall be stored off site subsequent to the termination of
the lease.
this Ordinance
of Auburn
office of
Upon the passage, approval and publication of
as provided by law, the City Clerk of the City
shall cause this Ordinance to be recc. rded in the
the King County Auditor.
~ The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
out the directions of this legislation.
Ordinance No. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 16
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1
2
~ This Ordinance shall
force five days from and after its
publication as provided by law.
ATTEST:
Robin Wohlhueter,
City Clerk
19
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
20
22
Michael J. Reynolds,
23 City Attorney
24
PUBLISHED:
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
25
26
Ordinance NO. 4938
January 2, 1997
Page 17
take effect and be in
passage, approval and
CHARLES A. BOOTH
MAYOR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARIER OF SECllON
30, IOWNSHtP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
KING COUNTY WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B
LOT 2 OF CITY OF AUBURN SHORT PLAT NUMBER SP-13-76,
REVISION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7812050719, BEING
A CORRECTION OF SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS
7808130588 AND 7807110287, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A
SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUAR1ER OF THE'
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECllON 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5
EAST WILLAMEITE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY 3.31 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 101.55 FEET
OF SAID LOT ~'
TOGETHER Willt THE NORTHERLY 12 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 28 FEET
OF LOT I OF CITY OF AUBURN SHORT PLAT NUMBER SP-14-78,
REVISION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8009290574, BEING
A CORRECllON OF SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
7807100253. SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORllON
OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF' THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30,
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON.
ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 3 OF THE CITY OF AUBURN LOOT UNE ADJUSTMEN~
NUMBER LLA-20-85, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
8701280787:
PARCEL C:
THE NORTH 9 ACRES OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN SECIlON 30.
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN
KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE BEING
ESTABLISHED BY AGREEMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 1926 UNDER64883:
RECORDING NdMBER 2164883:
EXCERT THE NORTH 120 FEET OF THE WEST 363 FEET THEREOF: AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR 84TH AVE. SOUTH ('A" STREET S
Ordinance No. 4938
Exhibit "A"