HomeMy WebLinkAbout51741 ORDINANCE NO. 5 I 7 4
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
3 WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO
AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY RELATING TO POTENTIAL
4 ANNEXATION AREA DESIGNATION AND FUTURE SERVICE PROVISION.
5
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.110(2), the Washington State Growth
6
7 Management Act of 1990, as amended, requires each City within
the County to propose the location of an urban growth area;
8
and
9
WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies adopted and
10
]1 approved by Ordinance 10450 on July 6, 1992 by the County
Council and amended by Ordinance 11446 on July 19, 1994 and
12
ratified by Cities within the County, establishes rules for
13
14 designating City potential annexation areas within the
15 countywide urban growth boundary; and
16 WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies state that each
17 City with a potential annexation area shall enter into an
interlocal agreement with the County for defining service
18
19 delivery responsibilities; and
20 WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies state that each
21 City shall designate a Potential Annexation Area in
22 collaboration and consultation with adjacent counties, cities,
23 and affected residents; and
25
26
Ordinance No. 5174
October 21, 1998
Page 1
1 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has signed intergovernmental
2 agreements with Kent, Federal Way and Pacific and has worked
3 with affected residents; and
4 WHEREAS, RCW 36o70A.210 of the Washington State Growth
5 Management Act of 1990, as amended, states that counties are
6 regional governments within their boundaries, and cities are
7 primary providers of urban governmental services within urban
8 growth areas; and
9 WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the
]0 jurisdictions cooperate to designate logical and achievable
11 potential annexation area boundaries and to ensure there are
]2 no overlaps or unincorporated urban islands between Cities;
13 and
14 WHEREAS, the parties agree that maintaining an
15 unincorporated rural/agricultural island by the County, will
]6 further efforts aimed at long term preservation of farmland;
17 and
18 WHEREAS, the City's potential annexation area was
19 identified in defined criteria with participation from the
20 general public and impacted jurisdictions, and consideration
21 of the City's ability to provide the necessary infrastructure
22 and services to accommodate increased urban levels of
23 development; and
25
Ordinance No. 5174
October 21, 1998
Page 2
1 WHEREAS, the City formally adopted its potential
2 annexation area in 1995.
3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
4 WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
5 Section 1. Pursuant to Chapter 39.33 RCW the Auburn City
Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to enter
7
into an Interlocal Agreement between King County and the City
8
of Auburn, regarding potential annexation area designation and
9
future service provision. A copy of said Agreement is
]0
attached hereto as Exhibit ~A" and incorporated herein by this
11
reference.
12
Section 3. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
14
out the directions of this legislation.
]5
Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
16
17 force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and
]8 publication, as provided by law.
19
20
2]
22
24
25
Ordinance No. 5174
October 21, 1998
Page 3
INTRODUCED: November 2, 1998
PASSED: November 2, ] 998
4
APPROVED: November 2, ] 998
5
7 CHARLES A. BOOTH
MAYOR
8
9 ATTEST:
11
Danielle E. Daskam,
]2 City Clerk
13
14
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
17 Michael J. Reynolds,
City Attorney
18
19
20 Published://' ~' ?~
21
23
25
Ordinance No. 5174
October 21, 1998
Page 4
q
AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF AUBURN
RELATING TO POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA DESIGNATION
AND FUTURE SERVICE PROVISION
This Agreement is hereby entered into by King County, a home rule charter county, a
political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation
of the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A. 110(2), the Washington State Growth Management Act of
1990 as amended requires each City within the County to propose the location of an urban
growth area; and
WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies adopted and approved by Ordinance
10450 on July 6, 1992 by the County Council and amended by Ordinance 11446 on July 19,
1994 and ratified by Cities within the County, establishes rules for designating City potential
annexation areas within the countywide urban growth boundary; and
WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies state that each City with a potential
annexation area shall enter into an interlocal agreement with the County for defining service
delivery responsibilities. Relevant countywide planning policies are attached to this interlocal
agreement as Exhibit A and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies state that each City shall designate a
Potential Annexation Area in collaboration and consultation with adjacent counties, cities, and
affected residents; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has signed intergovernmental agreements with Kent and
Federal Way and has worked with affected residents; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.070(3) and (6) of the Washington State Growth Management
Act of 1990, as amended, states that jurisdictions are to prepare capital facility plans that forecast
future facility needs and at least a six year a capital financing plan; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.210 of the Washington State Growth Management Act of
1990, as amended, states that counties are regional governments within their boundaries, and
· cities are primary providers of urban governmental services within urban growth areas; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the jurisdictions cooperate to designate logical
and achievable potential annexation area boundaries and to ensure there are no overlaps or
unincorporated urban islands between Cities; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that maintaining an unincorporated rural/agricultural island
by the county, will further efforts aimed at long term preservation of farmland, and
I 1999181~881:.!91
PRGF ee2 oF el~
' 10/15/1999 1:3:53
KING COUNTY, WR
P~1CZFIC NI4 TIT ~iG 22.00
WHEREAS, 'the City's potential annexation area is being identified using criteria defined
within this Agreement, with participation from the general public and impacted jurisdictions, and
consideration of the City's ability to provide the necessary infrastructure and services to
accommodate increased urban levels of development.
WHEREAS, the City formally adopted its potential annexation area, which is identified
on Exhibit B to this agreement, in 1995. King County's formal adoption will not occur until it
mends its Comprehensive Plan to include this potential annexation area. In the event King
County should fail to formally adopt the potential annexation area identified in this agreement,
this Agreement shall be null and void and should be renegotiated. King County's failure to
formally adopt this PAA shall not prevent the City from annexing lands contained within the.
PAA.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 39.34 the County and the City hereby agree:
I. PURPOSE. ,
A. The first purpose of this Agreement is to identify the City's potential annexation area
(PAA).
B. The second purpose of this Agreement is to establish the means and timeframe by
which the County and the City shall subsequently agree on development of lands,
provision of services, and construction and/or operation of capital facilities within
the City's PAA. Specifically, such an agreement will address the following:
1. Appropriate land uses, zoning, and development standards
2. Protection of resources and mitigation for impacts of development
3. Service types, levels, and providers
4. Continuation of local and regional resource and service planning strategies
ongoing within the PAA
5. Cooperative financing for planned capital facilities
6. Uses and maintenance standards for capital facilities
7. Timing and phasing of specific annexations within the PAA
II. DEFINITIONS.
A. PotentialAnnexation Area (PAA): The unincorporated urban area adjacent to a City,
within which urban growth shall be encouraged and phased, and which is expected to
annex to the City. Annexation is expected to occur sometime during the next 20
years. PAA is the unincorporated portion of a City's Urban Growth Area.
B. Urban Growth Areas: Areas proposed by the Cities and designated by the County
within which urban growth shall be encouraged and phased and outside of which
growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. A City's Urban Growth Area
includes its PAA.
19991e15oo1291
PAGE 003 OF el5
, 1o/15/1999 13:
KING COUNTY,
PACIFIC N~4 TIT AG 22.80
C. Urban Growth Area Line: The boundary marking the limit between the urban
growth areas and other areas, such as ntral and resource areas, where urban growth is
not permitted. The boundary shall be designated by the County in consultation with
the appropriate Cities, under the requirement of the Growth Management Act, as
amended.
D. ImpactArea.' A potential impact area is an area outside of a City's PAA where new
development may have an impact on that City's facilities and services. City
designation of an impact area will be done in collaboration with adjacent
jurisdictions.
IlL CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS
The following criteria were used for designation of the PAA. Proposed modifications to
adopted Potential Annexation Areas shall be supported by written evidence of a significant
change to at least one of the criteria:
1. Recognition of residential community identification.
2 Financial and technical ability to provide municipal services.
3. Creation of logical service areas
4.Recognition of physical boundaries
4.1 Bodies of water
4.2 Topographical features
4.3 Watersheds
4.4 Freeways
5. Protection of critical/resource areas significant to a particular jurisdiction.
5.1 Protection of critical and resource areas
5.2 Opportunities for urban separators
6.Logical boundaries
6.1 Elimination of unincorporated islands except for designated county
Agricultural Protection Districts which may remain under long-term county
jurisdiction.
6.2No overlapping PAA
6.3 Inclusion within the PAA of all parts of individual capital facilities or
infrastructure elements, such as roads and appurtenant rights-of-way
7. Comprehensive plans and interlocal agreements in place at the time Auburn 's
PAA boundary was designated. A subsequent interlocal agreement or
comprehensive plan amendment that calls for a modification of the PAA
boundary is subject to the amendment procedure outlined in section VI of this
agreement.
I , 19991015001~.~91
PAGE 004 OF 815
10/15/1999 15:55
KI~I~ COUI~TY, I~A
PACIFIC M~I TIT AG 22.08
IV. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING LAWS AND STATUES.
This Agreement is in no way intended to modify or supersede existing laws and statutes
and shall be construed in a manner which is consistent therewith. In meeting the
commitments encompassed in this Agreement, all parties will comply with the
requirements of the annexation statutes, Open Meetings Act, State Environmental Policy
Act, Growth Management Act, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, the King
County Comprehensive Plan, The Auburn Comprehensive Plan, and any other applicable
laws and regulations.
V. RESPONSIBILITIES.
The responsibilities outlined in this Agreement relate to A) the identification of the City's
PAA; B) the development of lands, provision of services, and construction and/or
operation of capital facilities within the City's PAA; and C) timing and phasing of
annexations within the City's PAA
A. PAA Boundary
1. The City and County acknowledge the City's PAA boundary, as described on
Exhibit B, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein.
2. The County has identified a preliminary list of the parks, roads and other
facilities, as listed in Exhibit C, which are capital improvement priorities in the
PAA. The City may also prepare a list of capital improvement priorities at a
later date based on comprehensive planning for the area. A single, mutually
agreed list of capital improvement priorities will be developed during service
negotiations.
3. The City will annex territory only within its designated PAA. Should the City
annex territory prior to execution of a PAA service agreement, the City and
County should agree upon the responsibility for facilities identified in Exhibit C.
4. The PAA boundary described in Exhibit B (must be amended to reflect deletion
of APD) will be forwarded to the King County Council as an amendment to the
King County Comprehensive Plan. This PAA boundary shall be included in the
next available annual County Comprehensive Plan amendment process, and
shall be subject to review pursuant to the SEPA and other public review
processes goveming amendment of the County' s Comprehensive Plan. In the
event King County should fail to formally adopt this PAA boundary in the
County's Comprehensive Plan, this Agreement shall be null and void and should
be renegotiated. After the City' s PAA has been adopted as part of the King
County Comprehensive Plan, amendments to the City's PAA will be made only
in accordance with provisions outlined in the "Amendments" section of this
Agreement.
5. The City and County acknowledge the impact area boundary described on
Exhibit B, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein. Within the
designated PAA and impact area, King County will notify Auburn of all land
I I 199910150012!91
! PAGF 805 OF 815
18/15/1999 13:
KING COUNTY,
PACIFIC Nl,,I TIT AG 22.80
use Xapplications requiring a type 2, 3, or 4 land use decision as defined by King
County Ordinance 12196. Notification of the application shall be provided
within 15 working days of receipt of the complete application and the City shall
have at least twenty-one days to provide comments on the application. Copies
of applications will be provided within seven days upon request by the City.
Alternatively, City staff may go to DDES and copy files of interest to Auburn.
All City comments shall be responded to specifically in any staff report prepared
by DDES after the effective date of this agreement. If a deviation from Auburn
standards is recommended, the staff report shall explain why the deviation is
necessary. If no staff report is prepared, DDES shall respond in writing to all
issues raised by Auburn.
B. Service Provision, Land Development, and Capital Facilities
Within one year of the effective date of this agreement, the parties will seek to
establish by interlocal agreement provisions for future development of land,
provision of municipal services, and construction and/or operation of capital facilities
within the City's PAA. This interlocal agreement will be known as the "Potential
Annexation Area Service Agreement." The service agreement will address:
1. Land Development
1.1 Adoption of Auburn's development standards
1.2 Protection of locally and regionally significant natural and cultural
resources
1.3 Mitigation for impacts of development
1.4 AdoptiOn of a transferable development rights program
1.5 Designation of Urban Separators
1.6 Provision of affordable housing, consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and Auburn's Comprehensive Plan
2. Municipal Service Provision
2.1 Establishment of municipal service types and levels, and of service
providers
2.2 Consideration of the City continuing local and regional resource and
service planning strategies such as Surface Water Management Basin Plans.
3. Capital Facilities
3.1 Identification of capital facilities to support urban land uses
3.2 Adoption of a financing plan with cost-sharing arrangements for
infrastructure investments and a reciprocal mitigation payment system
agreement that will address equitable distribution of impact fees targeted for
facilities needed to serve the PAA
3.3 Future use of existing capital facilities now operated for specific purposes
by the County
3.4 Adoption of capital facility maintenance standards
I 19991015001291
PAGE 006 OF 815
lo/15/1999 13:53
KING COUHTY, WA
PACIFIC NW TST AG 22.00
3.5 ~pwnership of new and existing capital facilities
3.6 Identification of those capital improvements which will not be undertaken
by the County within the City's PAA until the agreement regarding land
development, service provision and capital facilities has been finalized
between the City and County.
3.7 Transfer of local parks, recreation, and open space lands and facilities
C. Timing and Phasing of Annexations Within the City's PAA
The City will keep the County apprised of its plans regarding intended timing of
specific annexations within its PAA, to facilitate the smooth transition of service and
other jurisdictional responsibilities from County to City.
1. City and County staff will make themselves available annually, more often if
required, for the purpose of discussing timing and phasing of annexations within.
the City's PAA.
2. Before finalizing a specific annexation, the City will provide sixty (60) days
notice to the County
3. In annexing specific areas within the agreed-to PAA, the City will ensure that
existing County facilities are not divided by annexation area boundaries.
VI. AMENDMENTS
A. Amendments to the Potential Annexation Area:
1. A party to this agreement which desires to modify the adopted PAA shall
contact the other party to begin discussions regarding the proposed change.
Each party agrees to participate in such discussions when called by the other
party. Either party is authorized to call a meeting upon thirty (30) days written
notice.
2. The proposed modifications shall be supported by written evidence of a
significant change in at least one of the criteria outlined in Agreement Section
III. The City and the County shall seek to concur that the change warrants-an
amendment to the adopted PAA boundary.
3. A public process, including all affected parties, shall be conducted regarding an
amendment to a PAA.
4. The proposed amended PAA agreement shall be submitted to the respective
legislative authorities for approval.
19991815881291
' . PAGg' 00? OF 815
18,,15/1999
.... KING COUNTY~
PACIFIC Nbl TIT AG 22.00
B. Amendmeats to the PAA agreement text:
This agreement is the complete expression of the terms thereto and any oral
representation or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Any
modifications to the text of this agreement shall be in writing and signed by
both parties.
VII. DURATION AND TERMINATION.
This Agreement shall take effect upon signature of both parties and shall remain in effect
for a period of 20 years thereafter or until the PAA in its entirety is annexed into the city;
provided that, this Agreement may be terminated either upon written agreement by both
parties at any time or upon either party's providing six months written notice of
termination to the other.
VIII. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Each party shall bear financial responsibility for its own respective share of work
performed pursuant to this Agreement.
IX. SEVERABILITY
In the event that any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid or illegal such
declaration shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof, and such other
provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
X. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and
employees} or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss,
costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever, by reason of or arising out of
any negligent act or omission of the County, its officers, agents and employees, or
any of them, in the performance of this Agreement. In the event that any such suit
based upon such a claim, action, loss or damage is brought against the City, the
County shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided, that the City
reserves the fight to participate in such suit if any principle of govemmental or public
laws involved. If final judgment be rendered against the City and its officers, agents
and employees, or any of them, or jointly against the City and the County and their
respective officers, agents and employees, or any of them, the County shall satisfy
the same.
B. In executing this Agreement, the County does not assume liability or responsibility
for, or in any way release the City from any liability or responsibility which arises in
whole or in part from, the existence or affect City ordinances, rules or regulations. If
any cause, claim, suite, action or administrative proceedings is commenced in which
the enforceability and/or validity of any such City ordinance, rule or regulation is at
issue, the City shall defend the same at its sole expense and of judgment is entered or
I'
19991015801291
PAGE 008 OF 815
18/15/1999 13:53
KING COUNTY, MA
PACIFIC NM TIT AG 22.00
damages ~re awarded against the City, the County or both, the City shall satisfy the
same, including all chargeable costs and attomey's fees.
C. The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents and
employees, or any of them, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss,
costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever, by reason of or arising out of
any act or omission of the City, its officers, agents or employees or any of them,
relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. In the event that any
suit based on such a claim, action, loss or damage is brought against the County, the
City shall defend the same at its sole costs and expense; provided by the County
retains the fight to participate in and suit of any principle of government law is
involved; and if final judgment be rendered against the County, and its officers,
agents and employees, or any of them, or jointly against the County ,and the City and
their respective officers, agents or employees, or any of them, the City shall satisfy
the same.
D. In executing this Agreement, the City does not assume liability or responsibility for
or in any way release the County from any liability or responsibly which arises in
whole or in part from the existence or affect County ordinances, rules or regulations.
If any cause, claim, suit, action or administrative proceedings if commenced in which
the enforceability and/or validity of any such County ordinance, rule or regulation is
at issue, the County shall defend the same at its sole expense and if judgment is
entered or damages are awarded against the County, the City or both, the County
shall satisfy the same, including all chargeable costs and attorney's fees.
XI. ADMINISTRATION.
A. The provisions of this agreement will be managed by a Project Team composed of
the King County Executive or designee and the Mayor of the City of Aubum or
designee with additional staff to be determined by each party.
B. The Project Team will meet as necessary to ensure that the provisions of this
Agreement are fulfilled and will develop procedures and records as required to
accomplish the work of the Agreement.
C. The Project Team will use consensus to reach agreement. In the event consensus
cannot be reached, remaining issues will be forwarded to the respective governing
bodies of the parties for resolution.
' 19991015001291
PAGr 889 OF
10/15/1999 15:
KIIIG COUHTY,
PACIFIC HN TIT AG 22.80
This Agreement shall be administered by;
KING COUNTY CITY OF AUBURN
King Coun Executive Mayor Charles A. Booth
Approved 'as to Form: rove~
King County^Prosecut~/~ Attorney City Attorney
Q py
B~AUBPAA2
I 199918158812!91
PAGE 010 OF 015
10/15/1999 1~:
KING COUNTY,
PACIFIC NI4 TIT AG 22.00
EXHIBIT A
Relevant Countywide Planning Policies:
LU-29. All jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing plans consistent with
applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an Urban Area served with adequate public
facilities and services to maintain an Urban Area to meet at least the six year intermediate
household and employment target ranges consistent with LU-67 and LU-68. These
growth phasing plans shall be based on locally adopted definitions, service levels, and
financing commitments, consistent with State Growth Management Act requirements.
The phasing plans for cites shall not extend beyond their potential annexation areas.
Interlocal agreements shall be' developed that specify the applicable minimum zoning,
development standards,' impact mitigation an future annexation for the potential
annexation areas.
LU-31. In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in
consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential
annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each city. Potential
annexation areas shall not overlap. Within the potential annexation area the city shall
adopt criteria for annexation, including conformance with Countywide Planning Policies,
and a schedule for providing urban services and facilities within the potential annexation
area. This process shall ensure that unincorporated urban islands of King County are not
created between cities and strive to eliminate existing islands between cities.
LU-35. A jurisdiction may designate a potential impact area beyond its potential
annexation area in collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions. As part of the designation
process, the jurisdiction shall establish criteria for the review of development proposals
under consideration by other jurisdictions in the impact area.
RF-4 Each city Wi.'th a potential annexation area shall enter into an interlocal
agreement with the County for defining service delivery responsibilities. A financing
plan for investments in the annexation areas shall be included in the interlocal agreement
for capital facilities and service delivery. Level-of-service standards and financial
capacity should be considered for each area, together with density issues and phasing of
developments.
RF-5 In order to transition governmental roles so that the cities become the
provider of local urban services and the County becomes the regional government
providing countywide and rural services, unincorporated Urban Growth Areas are
encourage to annex or incorporate within the 20-year timeframe of these Policies. To
achieve this goal, all cities that have identified potential annexation areas shall enter into
interlocal agreements with King County that includes a plan for development standards
and financing of capital and operating expenditures during the period prior to annexation.
199910150012.91
PAGE 011 OF 015
10/15/1999 13:55
· KING COUNTY, t4A
PACIFIC N~I TI; AG 22.00
EXHIBIT B,
PAA Boundary Map
SEE ATTACHED MAP
' 19991815881291
PAG;' 012 OF 815
': 10/15/1999 13:53
KIHG COUfiTY,
PACIFIC H$4 TIT AG 23.ea
I
I
I
\
Appendix B: Auburn
CiW / X ' Urban Gr~h S~nda~
Auburn P~ ~ Mu~lesh~t Rese~ation
Impact ~e8
19991015001291
PACt 913 OF 815
10/15/1999 13:
PACIFIC N~ TIT AG 22,88 KING COUNTy,
EXHIBIT C
1. SE 312Tn St.
Capital Improvement Program Number: 300202
I998 CIP Appropriated Amount: None
1998-2003 CIP Programmed Amount: $1.19 million
Proposed MPS Cost Estimate: None
Location: SE 3 12m St., 112a' Ave. SE to 132"d Ave. SE
Scope/status: Widen to three lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks, and bike lanes. This is a new project in
1998. Design and right-of-way acquisition expenditures are projected for years 2002-2003. Construction is
not funded in the 6 year CIP. Design is scheduled to begin in 2002.
2. SE 277th (West Le~,)
Capital Improvement Program Number: 500298
1998CIP Appropriated Amount: $560,000 (County Portion)
1998-2003 CIP Programmed Amount: $2,702,000' (Preliminary Estimate -
County Portion)
Proposed MPS Cost Estimate: $2.8 million
Location: SE 277th St., SR-181 to Auburn Way North for entire inter-jurisdictional project. (The County
portion is in the western third of the project within Unincorporated King County, excluding the SR-167
interchange under WSDOT jurisdiction and the north leg of the West Valley Highway intersection in the
City of Kent's jurisdiction.)
Scope: (This is an inter-jurisdictional project with City of Auburn acting as the lead agency.) Coordinate
the design and construction of S. 277th Street with other corridor improvements proposed by the City of
· Auburn and the City of Kent. The widening of the bridges and modifying the signals at SR-167 will
require coordination with WSDOT.
Project Status: The project may be phased to forward only the portion of the project within the Auburn City
limits, due to current lack of funding. Design of Auburn's portion, the eastern two thirds of project, would
be funded with current Freight Mobility funding; construction is pending. future funding. Should funding
become available, the City may forward the county portion of the project to design and construction.
Tentative Freight Mobility (Auburn) portion schedule is for a Spring 1998 start date for design, and late
1999-2000 start for construction.
3. 124th Ave. SE t~, SE 312'h St.
Capital Improvement Program Number: 501197
1998 CIP Appropriated Amount: $244,000
1998-2003 CIP Programmed Amount: $1,066,000' *
Proposed MPS Cost Estimate: None
Location: Intersection
Scope/status: Project is in the preliminary design phase. Add left-turn channelization to 124th Ave. SE at
the intersection of SE 3 12m St. and revise the signal at this intersection. Provide a right turn lane for
northbound 124a' Ave. SE. Construct curb, gutter, 5-foot bike lanes and sidewalk.
· *This includes $88,000 programmed for 1997, which will be eXpended in years 1998-2003.
' Prior years expenditures amounted to $75,000.
' ' 19991815801~!91
PAGE 014 OF 015
10/15/1999 13:53
PACIFIC NW TIT AG 32.00 KING COUNTy, WA
The following projects w~re established as part of the Freight Mobility Partnership - RDCW23 project, per the
Interlocal Agreement between King County, Port of Seattle, and City Of Auburn for the Green River Valley Grade
Separation Design Projects.
King County commitments are listed below:
1. South 277th Street (Project No. C79001)- located in Auburn, $1,000,000 from King County.
2. Third Street SW/C Street (Project No. C79001) - located in Auburn, $250,000 from King County.
I I II~ 19991015001~!91
PAGE 815 OF 015
18/15/1999 1~: 5~
' KI~4G COU~4TY, 14A
PACIFIC ~4~ TIT AG 22.00