Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5959ORDINANCE NO. 5959 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF R.C.W. CHAPTERS 36.70A AND 35A.63 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on August 18, 1986 adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995 the City of Auburn adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and, WHEREAS, the City of Auburn on September 5, 1995 reaffirmed that action by Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments were processed by the Planning and Community Development Department as proposed Year 2005 amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the Year 2005 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 1 procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act with no appeals having been filed; and, WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Office of Community Development and other State agencies for the 60 day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on September 7, 2005 and October 4, 2005 conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and, WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Auburn City Planning Commission heard public testimony and took evidence and exhibits into consideration; and WHEREAS, thereafter the Auburn City Planning Commission made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2005 Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and, WHEREAS, on November 28, 2005 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations and made a recommendation to the City Council; and, ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, on December 5, 2005, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission; and, WHEREAS, in recent years, the State of Washington has considered legislation related to the streamlined sales tax (SST) project. Presently sales tax collection in Washington State is based on the site of origin, rather than on the site of delivery. With possible legislative changes that will provide that sales tax will be collected at the site of delivery rather than from those areas from which they were shipped, cities such as Auburn would be disadvantaged and negatively impacted. Plan amendments to address the negative consequences of such a shift in tax policy are appropriate; and, WHEREAS, in 2005 the City of Auburn brought together a focus group of diverse business and community interests that identified several economic development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is reflected in an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strategies and actions needed to affect necessary change for specific strategy areas within the City. Implementation of these strategies is intended to enable the City to achieve the City's economic development potential. Implementation of actions and strategies in the Economic Development Strategies is appropriate and reflected in various proposed amendments to various chapters. ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are herewith adopted and approved and it is herewith directed that they be filed along with this Ordinance with the Auburn City Clerk and be available for public inspection. Section 2. The 2005 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986 by Resolution No. 1703 and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995. Section 3. The Comprehensive Plan and amendments is herewith designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 4 Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: DEC 5 2005 PASSED: DEC 5 2005 APPROVED: DEC 5 2005 Peter B. Lewis MAYOR ------------------------ Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 5 ATTEST: hat" Dani le E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: PUBLISHED ( Z — q - Z` Ordinance No. 5959 November 29, 2005 Page 6 CPM#1 To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Public & Quasi -Public" to "Moderate Density Residential" for property located on the south side of 3rd Street SE, generally between N and O streets SE. (Parcel No. 2149800275, STR 18-21-5) C E Q C n Q E Q U W C (n f0 w W 3S IS 21 J 3S is !d � ^n a LU u) 3S_3S_0 w. - n c rn — W '- LL N W M`5t NESji- w p w 3S 1S W - - � - Y -- U) — (n o o=f{{f — w W 1.q L £. L p �— . g 1. FL w L Tj 4 �J N 3S l 3S lS l v -- - -- - - �I c ca W — w - ---- 3S_)S_N — I � � W U) L v 00 w 6'. a- i 3S 3S W - - w w N � S =1':; R51 z U) W I �� � � FH W U) L v 00 w 6'. a- i 3S 3S W - - w w N � S =1':; R51 z U) W CPM#2 To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Single Family Residential" to "Moderate Density Residential" for approximately 2.52 acres of property generally located at 17120 7th Street East. (Pierce County Parcel No. 05200560157 STR 05-20-05) m >0 1X X O Z J 0 O 0- 0 ry n z X W CPM #3 To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Light Industrial" to "Open Space" for publicly owned properties generally located north of 44th Street NW, east of 72nd Avenue South, and west of the Interurban Trail. o N N C. CO O J ELIMM Z U) LU I � -------'— F MN 15 I - h L I Z U) LU CPM #4 To amend the Comprehensive Plan land use map from "Light Industrial" to "Heavy Commercial" for property generally located south and west of the Auburn Municipal Airport, east of A Street NE. a qlw�- rf CPM #5 To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Light Industrial" to "Open Space" for property generally located south of 15 Street NW, east of State Route 167 and west of the Interurban Trail. ml M2 0 - E O U (D z F- U) X Lu a o N 8 f9 7 Q N CPM # 6 To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Heavylndustrial" to "Heavy Commercial", and from "Heavy Industrial" to "Public & Quasi-Public" for properties generally located north of 15th Street SW, east of the Interurban Trail, south of Highway 18, and west of C Street SW. 0- E E 0 U zip C) w U) O n O C� z co X w CPM # 7 (15th Street SW (south side)) To amend the comprehensive plan map from "Light Industrial" and "Heavy Industrial" to "Heavy Commercial" for property located on 15th Street SW (south side), between approximately State Route (SR) 167 and C Street SW. Comp Plan Amendment # 7 EXISTING IZA—G.nY+Msa F RUFU6LU 1 inch equals 200 feet T A A60111-11 N CPM #8 To amend the Comprehensive Plan land use map from "Heavy Industrial" to "Light Industrial" for property located on C Street SW (west side), south of 15th Street SW. W 4-j ^c W E W E co I.^L Y..L E O U E CD z X w V CO CO 8 (6 n Q' N IN P/T #1 Incorporate Auburn School District Updated 2005 to 2011 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors, April 25, 2005.) Capital Facllities lam 2005-2011 "Building the Future" AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT June 23, 2005 Paul Krause City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 Dear Mr. Krause, AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE Enclosed you will find two (2) copies of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2005 through 2011. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on April 25, 2005, in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington. Included in the Plan are the following: ❑ Six -Year Enrollment Projections ❑ Auburn School District Standard of Service ❑ The District's overall capacity of the 6 -year period ❑ An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations ❑ District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan and that the fee scheduled, approved by the City Council in November of 2003, be initiated in conformance with the Ordinance No. 5793. Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. Sincere , i ael Ne an sociate Supe ' endent Business and Operations Copy to: Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District w/o enclosure Grace Yuan, Preston Gates & Ellis w/o enclosure Jeff Grose, Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure P/r 915 Fourth Street NE; Auburn, WA 980024452 (253) 9314930 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Sming.Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Carol Neigerson Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent AUBURN :SCHOOL DISTRICCT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections...... ......... Page 6 Section III Standard of Service ........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities ....................... Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity............ .................... Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan ................. Page 20 Section VII Impact Fees .................................. Page 23 Section VIII Appendices ................................... Page 27 Appendix A1- Student Enrollment Projections Page 28 Appendix A2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 42 Appendix A3 - Student Generation Survey Page 45 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 1. Executive Summary This Six -Year, Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan') has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District') as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2005. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and Pierce County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the Pierce County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2004-05 capacity was 12,883 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,031.89. The actual number of individual students was 13,672 as of October 1, 2004. (See Section V for more specific information.) 2 The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities currently underway and provides for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005. Also, the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a new middle school is needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the City of Auburn and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi- family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn Schod District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 Owough 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2004 TO 2005 Listed below is a summary level outine of the changes from the 2004 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2005 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices Al & A.2. Section In Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional dassroom at the high school level. B. Increase of 2 computer labs at high school level. C. Increase of 4 teaming specialist classrooms at elementary level D. Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level Section N Inventory of Facilities A. Updated to include Auburn Mountainview High School in inventory opening 2005. B. Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Lea Hill Elementary School. and 2 relocatables units at ML Baker Middle School. Section V Pupil Capacity A. Updated to include Auburn Mountainview High School in inventory opening 2005. B. Updated to reflect addition of 3 relhcatable units at Lea Hip Elementary School. and 2 rek)catables units at Mt. Baker Middle School. Auburn Scrod District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2M through 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2004 to 2005 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2004 CPF 2005 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2964 0.3216 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1353 0.1584 by the school district based on distract Sr. High 0.1503 0.1632 records of average actual student generation Multi --Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0846 0.0687 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0455 0.0462 Sr. High 0.0533 0.0486 Boeckh Index $129.81 $129.81 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beds) Match % - State 54.19% 55.86% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 45.81% 44.14% Computed District Average AV Single family $206,623 $218,805 Updated from February 2005 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi -Family $52,994 $55,264 Updated from February 2005 IGN County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.18 $2.49 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.35% 4.63% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-05) Section Vlll Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2004 Appendix A.2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Aubum School DmW No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 dwough 2011 ENROLLUM PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for ado natio students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 2005-20062006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2004 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5289 5501 5583 5728 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ 3274 PROD PROJGRADE 3236 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 ;PqR0J 2009-2010 2010-2011KDG 5391 892 917 936 936 13226 952 9611 14355 1 960 976 992 1011 . 1019 1027 2 992 994 1001 1016 1035 1035 1043 3 918 1042 1035 1041 1056 1075 1075 4 1016 968 1082 1074 1081 1096 1114 5 957 1062 1004 1118 1110 1116 1131 K-5 5735 5959 6051 6196 6236 6293 6352 6 1020 1004 1099 1040 1154 1146 1153 7 1124 1061 1035 1130 1071 1185 1177 8 1130 1165 1093 1066 1160 1102 1215 6-8 3274 3231 3227 3236 3385 3432 3545 9 1461 1560 1582 1509 1482 1576 1517 10 1261 1343 1430 1451 1378 1351 1445 11 1055 1153 1225 1311 1333 1259 1232 12 886 959 1048 1119 1206 1227 1154 9- 4663 1 5014 1 5285 5391 5398 5414 5349 TOTALS 13672 1 1420414563 14823 15020 15139 15245 GRADES K-12 2004-2005 2005-20062006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5289 5501 5583 5728 5764 5817 5871 6-8 3274 3231 3227 3236 3385 3432 3545 9-12 4663 5014 5285 5391 5398 5414 5349 K-12 WK @ 112 13226 13745 14095 1 14355 1 14548 1 14663 1 14765 7 - Auburn School DiStl c No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the Cly of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a 'Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capaclyy to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehide to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation patter. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes whdhout accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twehhe elementary schools housing 5,735 students in grades K through 5. The 867 of the 892 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5, plus 25 kindergartners, attend on a ful day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,302. Four middle schools house 3,274 students in grades 6 through 8. The District Operates two Comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 4,663 students in grades 9 through 12. The District will open the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. CLASS Sl2E The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupiltteacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 -12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, Mss the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the Disirid's capacity to house projected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCA7701 The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. 9 Auburn Sdrod District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 Umougb 2019 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School Districtoperates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fifteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary levet. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 HEAD START Total Capacity Loss (27) The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for. approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 12 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for. this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) 10 Auburn SdWd DmW No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Aubum School District provides a teaming specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all twelve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) 11 Aubum school Distria No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLYDISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured teaming classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities. One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per midge school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a puW program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn Sdx*l District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/09/04 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms Gay 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Aubum School Distrix No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 tlMough 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured leaming center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The parent senior high school program requires sixteen classrooms to provide for approximately 420 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the sixteen teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 - At b"Wad District No. Mos CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2W fto"h sar i STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utfiization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 11/09/04 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,908) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,908) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,510) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,510) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = Loss of Temporary Capacity Total Capacity Loss 14 (3,898) 0 (3,898) 15 Auburn Sctw District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 IWENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OPSI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school Populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. 16 Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities W.1 a OSPI Rate Capacity (November 2004) BRMng I Capacity Acres Address Ekmeutrr Schools Was 553 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Termer Park Dick Scobee 450 6.70 1101 D Street Auburn W 98002 618 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Chinook 467 830 2301 M Street Auburn W 98002 Lea Hill 543 8.75 3502 Auburn W South, Auburn WA, 98092 516 10.00 30908124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo R 596 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 EvergreenHeights 512 8.09 5602 South 316th Auburn WA, 98001 Al 554 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View 667 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood llalko 648 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Auburn WA, 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 657 6,781 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Auburn WA, 98092 Middle Schools Cascade Olympic 902 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 970 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier 916 26.33 30620116th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker 913 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,741 Seim H" Schools West Auburn 250 5.10 .401 West Main S Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior High..2 ,485 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast, Auburn WA 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,503 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1 551 40.00 28900124i° Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,729 TOTAL CAPACITY 16,311 16 Aubum SdW District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2M V"ugh 2011 INVENTORY OF FACKSMS TABLE I TEMPORARYIRELOCATA6 IV1 FACILITIES INVENTORY lElementary Location 2004-052006 06 200E'07 2007-08 2006-09 2009-10 2010-11 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Soobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CHnook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill2 5 5 5 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hlalko 5 5 1 5 1 3 3 3 3 TOTAL UNITS 30 33 33=31 28 28 28 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 875 875 742 742 742 Middle School Location Cascade 2004-05 2006-0606-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009.10 2010-11 Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 Rainier 5 5 5 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 Mt Baker 2 4 6 8 8 6 g TOTAL UNITS 7 9 13 20 20 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 210 270 390 600 600 540 540 Sr. High Sdiool Location 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2006-09 2009-10 1 2009-10 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn Auburn Riverside 12 12 15 10 12 10 12 12 12 12 Auburn Mountainview NA 0 0 10 10 0 10 10 TOTAL UNITS 27 22 22 0 22 0 22 0 22 TOTAL CAPACITY 810 660 660L222 60 660 660 660 k.VrnwntU 1 V IAL UIGTS 64 64 68 73 70 68 68 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,815 1,805 1,925 2,082 2,002 1,942 1,942 17 18 -- Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2906 Owough 2011 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn Schod District uses the SPI invenbry of pemnanent fackies as the data from which to determine space needs, the Districts educational program requires more space than that provided for under the fomwla. This additional squame footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section 111, Standard of Service. The DishWs capacity is adjusted lo reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities and the elimination of the facility that formerly housed the Alternative W. High. The combined effect of these adwstments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distils capacity with rebcatable units included and Table V2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables k14,760 04-05 2005-06 200647 2007-08 20MM 2009.10 2010-11 A SPI Capacity 14,760 16,260 16,860 17,460 17,460 18,260 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 600 600 A2 SPI Capacity- New MS I 800 A3 SPI Capacity -New Sr. High+,870)(2,1 ,500 B. CapacityA4ustments (133 (2,130) (1,973 (2,053) 2,113) (2,113 C. Net Capacity 12,127 14,7301 5.4-87-F 15,407 1 16,1471 16,147 D. Enroorrie E JAASDD urpl nuaJDeficit I 1 (72) ,672 1 14,(1 14, 67 I 1466331 15,387 11,E I 15.245 902 Exclude Alit JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40 Include Rebcatable 1,815 1,805 1,925 2,082 2,002 1,942 1,942 Exclude SOS ( 12 (3,645) (3,898) (4,015 (4,015 4,015) (4,015 (4,015 TotalA*mtrnents (1,870) (?,133) (Z,13q (1,973) (z (2,113) (?,113) Table V2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables Net Capacity 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 A SPI Capacity 14,760 14,760 16,260 16,860 17,460 17,460 18,260 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 600 600 ASD Surpfus/Defidt (2,597) (1,881) A2 SPI Capacity- New MS 1 (1,81 (934) (1,040) 800 A.3 SPI Capaciet~ Sr. Hgh 1,500 B. CapacityAdjustmerits (3,685 (3,938) (4,055 (4.055) 4,055 (4,055) 4,055 C. Net Capacity 11,075 12,322 12,805 13,405 13,405 14205 14,205 D. ASD Enrollment 13,672 1 14,204 14,563 1 14,823 15,020 15,139 15,245 E ASD Surpfus/Defidt (2,597) (1,881) (1,758) (1,418) (1,81 (934) (1,040) AN JH 1 (40)1 (40)1 (40)1 (40) 1 Total A*Mtme+nts ! (3,685)1 (3,938) 1/ New facilities shown in 2009-110 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 24.69% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 20.26% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non-lassroom spaces (commons, library, theater) as well as rented space. 19 20 Autxxn Sdiod District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through Ml CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document lifted 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - - A Comununity Involved. ' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every Classroom and department. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn Sdhool District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23,1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the fall of 2002 a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71 % yes votes. The school is currently under construction and will open in the Fall of 2005. 21 Auburn school District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Zoos through 2011 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the a Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed re and duff ##1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools (Elementary #13 and Elementary #14). The voters approved the ballot measure in February at 64.72%. Elementary #13 will be built in the Lakeland area on a 12 acre site the district owns. Elementary #13 is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2006. Elementary #14, scheduled to open in the Fall of 2007, will be constructed on a 10 acre site the district owns in the Lea Hill area. The District is projecting an additional 1790 students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lea Hill areas. This irxxease in student population will require the construction of two neve elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections. as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-one percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 1 1 1/ 1/ 2004-11 Capital Construction Plan / / March 2005 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Source AN Facllities - Mar -05 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 008-M09-10 10-11 1998 Technology Modernization Yes $8,000,000 6 Year XX AM Facilities - Cap Levy 2008 Technology Modernization Yes $12,000,000 6 Year xx xx xx xx xx xx Cap L krw Portables Yes $700,000 Fees xx XX XX xx roperty Purchase New Middle Yes $5,000,000 XX XX School Bond Elementary #13 Yes $15,600,000 Impact XX xx xx Fees const const open Bond Elementary #14 Yes $15,600,000 Impact XX xx xx xx Fees Const const open Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 xx xx XX xx an Const const open Bond New Sr. High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX XX Fees const n 1/ These funds may be seared through local bond issues. sale of real property. impact fees, and state matching funds. The District arrently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level. 22 23 N U LL C _� o w H y E cl V! - m 1 m ^ O W �. N q HHyy 0 lL_ v O O. G O ►� O 41, LL to W), N — O M N U HHN h m 0 G LL j w pY p n OO LL w O O h O » lgmL h co ON N U _O *0 Y^ O C O H 00 eq N y ulHH uj — LEenomamo LL O � �rotNotmo cN E1�Nto E�Nm O O O j 0 C. 0 C C Y 2 0 0 0 LL to p O O O LLY L .10'm t0 LLQ, 0 0 O �2 d �� a� o00 olio c t LL m LL L L Z C �— L O 04 O 0= c s C E O LL C E 0 m d' m .r m o co S LL M m o L_:N LL LL c Em�N G E o M O U) Z e- O C "� N m j C O M L U LL N m O L M LL N~ U M r O O O ? N q a o 0 o m o 0 0 L t o 0 0 _ to O J O CO rn (.1 $ 7a 10 �-� c Cl O `o v Lho� 0 Q LL N M M wyNaaoro a' LL CO ay VOI60.00D LL ,c c L to 40 90 N L m m L LL iLi € O W W W 0 CO O E O SCC co 40 90 OM LL a a FO C G O i5 2 h h Q Q 0 0 X o x' x V � O j U OWL =O H x N a 5.v O OH O OOa p W), CD c� 00 r .L oQ »L CO m 0` a u )UQ m yNt� LL U o aoo 0o�—ZQ 1 LL o x x o0 a! 2: oLLQ 0O o O m O O LL L OH mO VL Wo U 04 mW WUOy cNN Q LLLUmh m O N UteC0 O HmotO� H_ 9 W x I'LL M ak p W W 0 OD = Y 7 O Q U ro V L O V ._. V m LLL m y � LL m h Q c » L o o o Y N m Y . W w 1> ov a o oQW Ev10 =� c� WEto t€ o W o vtj=—Lo° 111 tq N 2 4%Q�qa R#R 'oma V 2 --�©-� 2®- %E4* 10 Z®� �� £� w� =�7 Co cl 0 xI § 7 �I/ R ; c - 2K a# �§ 0 t �§ go$ �® 2 %L L Xpi �2r$gr m#- -2�§fR§ �a� _{-� � eA $-® a # �_L m ss L) CLE fk tea« ;# 4■2 as k CL lu.s U. LL � -- 2S§�§f ?—. IxJ�kE Lb k ;a U. 0 � m 4%Q�qa R#R 'oma --�©-� 2®- %E4* �� § k t 2 � �2r$gr m#- -2�§fR§ �a� _{-� $-® a # - L) kk k �■ _<<.-E U. LL � -- 2S§�§f ?—. IxJ�kE �e� .k o?ALLL U. m to N _ 0 CDcli °Doo �. o Ntn� fD O h C> M Cm Q7 h W m O do W t+! N O COD r N Y co O N U O co co H W f O O b 4 O H f M'f } J O - V Uo N O O N N .-• _ Cl C pp tU o f- m O O O O O O N t'M') aOo W O.. O W io N t0 W Cp co N y h 0 0 h M h H "r N E O n o O p C o °'cli n OC. n h V u e o W Y p m m N O m t f q_ p 4m c N so W O Co W amo V O CD M Cl! it i7 O 10 K H V)' O O r Y N to N t9 d N S. O O Of O °root C N N 'r ' to P- o 0 t `°°°v_'e v u q ro W N O b O' C, Ow to p N W Co C.. OD 'to We O 7 t'7 h 6S t9 r O O Y N y Y to H J O o W n r P- Oct J 'a m co p to T Q C lh p' N 4 M O d Co co V. O M _IR Go N H O O N q cqZ N "! 4S e•- �- N h N o m O E O O p O W n q h O n allo_ v C h 0^ O W Y N ro m - N O It m t f ro Q O O W am0 .�-• O Ndo M ' O O jq in 'Y m _N ` f tN 'o c ao N E o o c O LL O a c M 4 u E p 0 C } 7 A N m E W J d< O 2. T T U C h O p COi d C LL W 3 3 a c a n� = O M Be O O > N 0 N d N LL. 4 O E ~ E r E b ,�' a O v o$ 4 U O O a a U 3 W O a It c Q o O 7 O 7 C _E W 49 -p Z N O rG C ab 0IL 0 0® 0 •O ►• C O Q m iisU t0 U pt0 or IL t0 W 4 Q 0 m O= O o T EuoZL m tr �(� m v M€gym O d o�>o Q' N 3�0 U U N m a> N o 0_pLL o o Q'' fWop p o nib o C o m U N h N Z «« W cc G C C ern c� he o tno QaE€E EoEE v'��°g vi¢mW ¢ at K ¢� UJ CD U) IL tiLL LL LL LL U 0 W o a O O o/ p O m 0 n U a d= = C o m w a We C U D O r 4! X U O OO m0 m LL LLLLCo 0 LL LL 7 X > m LL LL 2 LL O rn V! Uj or Cy O m c LL o ¢ b O O V 3 3 E E m o E E o a F cYi=4=4 Q tom inZZ Fes- in in IL o tai�rn cc 0 OC9 h fl to N 27 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 28 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2004 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used The fust uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Aubum* kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past S years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I — Thirteen Year History of October I Enrollments — page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October I of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Pro'ections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1— Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival" It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 29 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 — Prg ection Models - pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. o Table 3.13 (pg 5) —shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. o Table 3.6 (pg 5) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. o Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. o Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) — breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. - o Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. o Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) —breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. o Table 4 (pg 10) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. o Table 5 (pgs 11-13) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 30 M V Q N O N m m t+ N v m m m m ` O N N N W N b th N Y tD tp W O M M Y h M N Q O aW0 W OD r r r r W O O n m N on m o am* N Y It) N NN n co) N M m O N9 a40 O 00 N N W m n Mb n .r N O b- N m O W Y N co) Y W) V-- N CO) Y M m Y p - O Y N O O n p ti OD W W W W--- OD M N N �+ m m m m t0 t0 m m W W a0 " M m CD, r r- r- - N W N or m N Y t0 N m M N M m Y M A M t� N �. m _ _ no a tq O O M m O N N Y I n M N r^y t T m O O m Y n N M Y _ m Y Y O M Y N p O O Y N N M W W W W W �- �... W O1 M m M O W n n m m m W h er m C V M w m N Y O M N M It b V e � O O m m Co. n 00 co n Y tt) M O '� C t t m O m m Y m Y m r- � O O C 'OY O o M Y Y N C 0 W W Wr W� M M Y N .mp m Y W tM m m m m W W Y N N W W y �m r e-�r rrr q_ N U- mnaD N t4 m m00 N t0 m M N M M Z O o a' -W N p G� c CDnc�.m-cmr o Y N O N O W O N mtto a amN eN-MYY Cb Co Co MM co 00 CDO C4 W -s Y b N M Y tO.J O O: C m e � O WY b n r O M M IL Y aNO o�O n h 0 0 o aD W 0 0 0 W W W O b tn7 co N O ODD H M W to t7 W m M O r �. M m N co 40 toM b b N W M N O Yom. tu �.- �CZ. JW "'� h N b Y N N W W p O n Y M N q m W n a0 m M tt7 W Y N n W n M W n M h O co Y h to Q O O O N n M m m W W W W W W ter,,, r„ OD N .- N t4 am m N m Y CD 4�0 0 O O r N i7q N h anD M Y b N M N O Y P! 3E Q Z W 40 ^^ b b `f b m n N N 'mf O N C COD p b m W W W W d1 COt Oo• �., a0 M ^ co W C,4N CCD col, M W W ' N b b coM M Y to N N O Q Q 0 0 L40o � n mm _ W nWm� aD mY GCWOYAN _ mMW m9a (n u) b W �.m W W W W W W W W W r r m m � M W m %0 Co. Go W aoY m Y4 CO n � N m N tf t[ N N � M N U E r ,o colm n m W Y O Y M m n n m M .� r `Q jp n Y W M CO N m h Y W O Lo W W W W W W OMD OMD W Cl) mm OmD amp n N N M W N N W OND to O Ut - t~ amD H `nf h N N M N J m o Q O O W t- Y n M M Y N m m N O O P N n n m on W Y m N O w Y n O O _W N m to m N co m 0 m m h N W W W W W W W m W W co m m - N m m O G W O m m m M 0 h to M O N O O N W m O N Y try N N M M N U O Q Q 2 p `► W t" e O W O m Y N O m 0 .-� N m Ot ,r M E p ta m m N m m tD m n m N = M t0 m N N N tD n CO m Y m M tO M m W W W W W W m W m W m n m N O M Y m Y m M 00 CD W� CO M W m O W r N U °D N h m N Y n N r N N N m ca E C to d W O Y Y O m Y W m W N Y N n d 0 tt) O m m O m Y m P r N N m M N h w n N O O N C W W oD W WmWmmmmnn.- 'O W N h _M n n O N W N Y tto N r N M N W W J D O W r g Y r N M Y tD m n m W N F O r0 m Q C� Cl to m M to m CO m W C', Cli Its � � ryYYY m nn �o 0 M 0 N I- 0 O N Z _O W 7 O a F - Z W 2 J O z W I- W F - y t- o OC H _N O J O O to Z m a .l 7 WOm = d ► Dpia M M W Q W 0J e e e o e e w s o o e o e o o e • o 0 0 o e e e • • e o 0 0 0 o e .�► D .� o` o o e e a") N A m m m m N 'C O m m m m a0 W O r M W M M W A {pp M m r aD M co m to N Y n r m N W m r O m W.) U) Z W p aq r W m m M 'OR co an0 an0 aD `f aA t• m N co m M h N M aO m W m W a0 N -nw go p Q ahv>`tvYv wvv-C V" 47 CO. � lW-M „Q, N a0 N aO 7 rra a0 W Q E . Qo.aaao��, oma W �•-'•'- v v v v V) W J 0 o m C N N CO 00 CO 0 m m m m tY W W n r- m W Z p YZ O O n V' M m "t W N m W) N N "i A W r O m W m N W N m r n m O N M N m m n m r .r O a y N O b !� A E m mnahmmnmmnnaon maosoc,e, W W W W Wooa�W.0c, W A►.a a,w a a a b btu LD n' uJ L) W 1•" W= j O w m W m �P n m a0 m m O r m A C. /7 N Y N m m M P-a0 O Q I m N M A N e0 n m O O V' N N r W m N m m r A A' r r N N n N r Mph - IV M h Y an a0 M W r: O. N m aO m a0 ap O M Z Z p J LD q r W p O n m= O_ M O ao N m 1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r --- M- M M- r m m n- a0 40 W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N J W O K LLY UOQQQ'LLoe Z � C C !e C, 00�ao a`WOA W NM mmAmWOr NM C> mnaoWW an w n m W O �� N 1000 m n m W O N t'9 h m n O A 0} aq t` n (� A n m m m m m m a0 m m W p W W W W W W W O o 0 0 0 C. 0 0 o o " O U N W i J Z OLL b U �� M Of Cot"M M COCo n N 40 Cl O O m m M Orr Y m m O n M M m an N OA A m W mco 000A� N W -0 C, N C, -0 mm WaD ap 0o ao `t an h h i0 0 1p W r: N M W m ID 0 c M W m aD a0 Q r m aD h W m m N 7 t?Y NNV G to v .r v � .t 11 as v Ki q aD aD aD aD ap t` n m a0 n m n n a0 f` n- r` n n n ►, r, 3 c 2 a m m m A� a0 s m O O r m W W5 N M ah W M n m O N O p n^ O O N Imp ay W A a0 m A a0 M o A r- m O W- ob O m 5 V M N O_ 000 W A M O r M a0 aD aD M '�R a0 m W m m W W r m r W •' r r '�t r .N- ----- � A A m t+> m q r r '? ��•- .�- r r .d. J In Q= C aD mm W W MO Nm'f OOrM 4 ao n A a0 Man m N M W 'f m m W N O O r co A A W O M A 'r W m M N 0 1� .r C8, aO n O m ae n m 0 m act a0 an M co wl O J m cO O 1q A A O M O O q cp N ►: al O W m M M M M' "i q m ao n ap ao m W W O C N m m N N N m .- .-- N N N < N - ay r r r r r r r r r r �•' " �' �•' N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N Y V N M V O N N M m 10 r- Wm WW 0o0N mW WainW W nWM Wtv WnW W W WWnW O WNoW W W m U Z}Q W Wm WanOW W W W WW WmOD W WWWWWm 0M r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 to C r r r r N N N N .l 7 000000000 - •::.:- m m N a0 N aO a0 N a0 ai�D CO N �•-'•'- co V) `� A oyir� N M o m 7: _•: N N M aq N W Y r N M V in m n m to C �•' N } pa C o coaoocorrNnMmT aa)MM �o M O O a[) O ap W a0 OD NN m M> p .�•:. W N m r n ap n O to ap a0 aei W 74 •:: N N r M N r m d ._•-_ m ca O O 4 av Y r N M Y d< N - M N cA 4m } LL m m n aD G> p U E M ILL k .l 7 r' 0 4p 400 m n n 00 m w GD M O^ N n 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 p M O N N Wm M W W A O M 1 r N Y Y W m m A A ►� 40 W r . m W O O O O C 3.cop r- r m^ r M Y O W r• aD r O M Y W m tDaD m A 40 aD `? M h W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M m N h N W O N N O N m A N N M* b 40 m m Y 0 U -j. 40 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 'f W A d m A M O N d N OD r N M V h D0 40 o W^ m 0 o O o 0 0 0 W M 40 40 A 4D h N M h 40 4D OD O O O N M a Y •f r' .� 0 0 O O Cl. 0 0 N N O n W W M M 40 A N 'T /.h 40 O W O r N M M h I- N 40 4D W o W o 0 0 0 o p ZE V�to pIv W 4WD OO r A N v w n 0 co .M -Ii W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O M W C) C Mr- W W) go N 407 O ���0000Wfr��' 10 N N O M CAD Q W m C4N OD AD 0 r-- v O r CD m win CD m^ Co Y M M 47 N m N �f W W W C r0 W Or cm, .1- r C14 ID W) OD a W OMD CD � W� W 0. h M Orr W W n C '. O Y 40 CLI C C N O N 4D 4D A o d C. M N 40 i W W W 40 N M 40 m M M A O OD W W W W r 40 w 0_ r c Ix' [7 J O M V an m A 40 W F a 0 M Cl) QD M N Y VO' U.J. 4D aM0 Q� aO0 A m a /h 0 d A M W W W W 4A W W W N o W M N M r O N 40 Oan N N 4D O C, 0 �_ amZi .0 W W W W CMD p OD Cb o 0 0 N N Y -0 41 40 W W m W 0 N w L 4o W W. W cm O W W W C w U 0 � O e m M W f-m e NM'T 440Appm W r M N 4WD UJ. N 40 W co W W A W W W �N., r 0 m N Z a~ r O O A N M< 4A m W O O r W r C9 O W Ix W W W w aDW W��.N-r�� �A 0 O M a M A 40 N m m p f 40 10 h r e A N M 4D O t0 A N N p M Z a CO W W M Q W O O O O W O W N r A r d� O r W ao O t0 N O W m M N 4D r O e A 'r !` M N 0 N 40 F- a o4D W W W W Wca.00NA oo or W M 0 -aov I,-4D o N waW��w�rr�4vic4' F V '"' 0 4ODlM7 Y m m W N q K) Cl) N ►� G CO) a p 4D W W W W W W r M N 0 co to to N o 00 OD M h 0 r N n b R40 co Y m M W W W W W W r M A „rO r. r V Z i O 2 A W O O M M O OOD 4MD N e OD 04 a a 10 4D OBD OMD r0 W Or W Or - - �N�- r0 M M V '� _ M A m M '� f N 40 k �4'> O M p) W '7 t0 G N co co'�t A n co 4D W W O a 0 r O r P-1 H m O W 0 `t N ul,O 00 U G 4WD Q W m O i s: n A [3 m 'O' - to Q J O J y r N to v h m A M W rO �"< a to ri O F 0I lm - r' 0 4p 400 m n n 00 m w GD M O^ N n 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 p M O N N Wm M W W A O M 1 r N Y Y W m m A A ►� 40 W r . m W O O O O C 3.cop r- r m^ r M Y O W r• aD r O M Y W m tDaD m A 40 aD `? M h W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M m N h N W O N N O N m A N N M* b 40 m m Y 0 U -j. 40 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 'f W A d m A M O N d N OD r N M V h D0 40 o W^ m 0 o O o 0 0 0 W M 40 40 A 4D h N M h 40 4D OD O O O N M a Y •f r' .� 0 0 O O Cl. 0 0 N N O n W W M M 40 A N 'T /.h 40 O W O r N M M h I- N 40 4D W o W o 0 0 0 o p ZE V�to pIv W 4WD OO r A N v w n 0 co .M -Ii W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O M W C) C Mr- W W) go N 407 O ���0000Wfr��' 10 N N O M CAD Q W m C4N OD AD 0 r-- v O r CD m win CD m^ Co Y M M 47 N m N �f W W W C r0 W Or cm, .1- r C14 ID W) OD a W OMD CD � W� W 0. h M Orr W W n C '. O Y 40 CLI C C N O N 4D 4D A o d C. M N 40 i W W W 40 N M 40 m M M A O OD W W W W r 40 w 0_ r c Ix' [7 J O M V an m A 40 W F a 0 M Cl) h O r M � ao a� N�c� Qr° W co to m w IrC4 to a- Q'n wnaoo w O W Q O N m W oD a Q. W V.-� w gym` C, OD� o c a -- v O m m N N N 0n w COn aD o.- m Q. ov Co aor o a WW�r-�o a �C�p .+ v O 0-CD p I.- co, I-- ' W IL nwaw�.-�o OM �� N cfC*apoh� 0 Z JL o o v T o 0 P Ci ' _� Q w Mw'f ODD O w p W ' r 'C tlf O M N W N W CL Www�r��m Q C4 Ir 0000�� =o 7 O oC -� M CL _40 a' W O� O N O Q M !` O a U C. Z a- N O COwco) a� �000:�'o 0 W W m "Mt h^ N M n m a r w W W W r, OnD ti ti O N 0 n -.A— w W w o 0 ow a W ' 5•D N N O w m M N 40 v Z p It v h so `� N 7 O M a � W w W p W O O� N 0 0 Q w M W n W m M f- N O CO Q' O V 0 0 0 0 .- CD 0 .- .- p� 0 .- -- Oo M M W•- r- ' :Z n ap m N h 0 ao O w M h W y (C O M N m mi m. W W r r .-- w a W W W W w w _O w 00 1- Q co M co OND O V) n W h N a'a co w w w w 0 0 0co T V co O M n M N N '.t Ml I� ap aD N M m to W N n n n M N N m OD W W W O O N N N w 7 w W Q O t� n W N♦ M m n N g O M M CD a p co W w M .� r .- r r r 00 M N C m a � *Op Nw OMD p M m 0 p O 0 r M.. O Q O w m M m n N aD ap co N^ aD W W W w W n- m OOD a p n N Y m OD TO OMD O W N to ^ n V) n C m 0 DMD N O N Go V eM- l p _ .. __ a 0 OD W W W w .- W :M- O v M N e 7n .. N n M a 0 a^O A W DMD p W 0 OOD O M M N O h lM7 Tcoo O M n CO tli %'.: a' W O Co, 00 C ono W O O Q O M .- 6 -�sk !O�oMt-- 03, .r Nmnno °Do n co W p O p W �- M M n n 0 fits :oto_ �Y: ie Q W .r m M M n co w O N 0 TO Eli,= a 0 •- r r- W M M a0 w w p w o w O r Yf M Q M F _ n N• •=jk ile O N O N ao m n o v O � m (9 U w M N N M m m m m a n 0 N O N 0o m n O ao W W W w 0 r N O amo cm7 O. E� < 4CD 0 W W O O N M O N O oD m U O r '- r .- r .- ao M Q J Q O W cl m Q Y N M v n m 1, co w `" N Q Ll. m Q a' r r h• EG Q 0 N M f Wo to f- to wC�, �M 1Q- h O r M N < Y n W C D W W n n to N m m W Q Q Q mCD. oD m OW N N V g N m m W W W N n M N N M Y 1 g m W W (D W W Ir N/M7V W) M W W W W W M nuDNnOD N M m m m W O D W W W N WmjOW N M m m ID WWWWW OmNe- C M lw m m n W W W C D W O 7 N W M W MY m m n W W WAW n m _m b 6 an CY 4 CL W 1 � -�v C.) 04 cli C N L (b CDD '' W to W �� wwame �D r m N N p �t`t to W W W W O 1 1 � m m W to M •OW CMD CND W WCnD 0 M- W- no n m m W� p V olN`t ma�D�'7 111 eD aD W W 0 4.11Y" N m �va000N R co WmZr,c, V) 't mmW jr0 00000 p W m W M C D QD CD n M� Y m O O N m m n m O t m m m 00000 N V to mD� N h WM mm C N n o _ WOWm ,,. m'0 p v mmm�N W W W W r = a: r i 0. en .raonM �]� YaD N M Y o000o O Mn m.-MtD JM MMC> OND C3,Y eh szss 0000- c c O n O W m Qi _Mty m ON O N OD w n 1p m C7 L � m N )o Gco 45 W G tiEt C', 1 O c � ' W O C.) p W o uj Q — N M v to M 0 O n m _m b 6 an CY 4 CL W 1 � -�v C.) 04 cli C N L (b CDD '' W to W �� wwame �D r m N N p �t`t to W W W W O 1 1 � m m W to M •OW CMD CND W WCnD 0 M- W- no n m m W� p V olN`t ma�D�'7 111 eD aD W W 0 4.11Y" N m �va000N 1[DYm�n o jr0 00000 CN n MONNW m O O N m m n m t m m m 00000 N OD o h co M p m m N 0 0 0 0 0 m m NY 10N aN op O O O O O c> oo in r 0. en .raonM �]� YaD N M Y o000o N in JM OOtiDm eh C� 0000- O n O W m eq L � )o coM000 to C', 1 O ' W O n prm00 CD CD W C, C3, .M W C Y M Y aD N O nCO CD W m W CD O O W) C.4 't mn n 0 mmnCD p� N ' Im 4m 40 n onVmNM OD O W N p m m CD OD bo M r om C M Q W OCMDO c D ONm'Dn _c � W - m "- W W W W p— n m _m b 6 an CY 4 CL W 1 � -�v C.) 04 cli C N L (b CDD '' W to W �� wwame �D r m N N p �t`t to W W W W O 1 1 � m m W to M •OW CMD CND W WCnD 0 M- W- no n m m W� p V olN`t ma�D�'7 111 eD aD W W 0 4.11Y" N m �va000N YY CD, W C D W W to o cq r- Q C C `t 1p Q N 0 m O O N m m n c c Ip 'p -m c ".10 CRmW. WWW p CD .-= o � � ��NM`f m� ui M7, I ��� NM `f m� I M O v7�? aiO I p W CMD W W O r-- W N C CND CMD Cb W co co n0G Mmco O?m, mNMW W OmD- O m to M n o M m_ a o O N m o n m W � v m p W W W W —NM atm 0 tvvO�t O N a o 0� O m OD W o ' °� N n to O O O '� 00 a n N N w N O N � O y O. r r M N a n O n . a or m n r° m O W M e a m MW OD N 0 `n-' a m O G M N a m OMD cr m O 0 n r O m M Wnom cD 0 o O m ED W n o V n O morn O� cD Om to (4 C) C. Ov 'm aO M W N oma- O'h OMD W d ' ren O r 0- r O j� OOD N W W M m N �� at)e v^ O h m m CIO m O m O m 0 Co 0 M N it a W W W p CD M O O M 0 0 e o �' 0 z a ' � y a d r N 0 0 0 Z O r r r O ' 'p�- O r rD e0 0 n o e c+0 O •' h b h co o 0� W aD N W S n m O O Y N w a r W W O r W N _^ N w 17 0 Co C. N O O 0 d .' r M N a W W N O N O` M O N 'Y 0 0 0 m OD 'M., C, O V 7 �e w0 fi to a It IM 7 _M a W� O N O -N a 0 0 0 r b a W o 0 O M a O Z N. a 0 to c 0 N O Lu O�NONO ie J J W c o o It O�cMD c09 rn0N� O O��ON Otov v r o 0 0 V4mto aO O O� N p CL 0 0 C4 •� C4 '�DAOM O l... 0 O Mra��--� O Or Ne ccoo �i' O�OWmma DA .r O O O O m aD to N V to a a Z ar W .-M.: l0 ar r�rm aoMoov OC0000 r b aci WCL 93 'o o- O w n'�W W r' 10 O O O ��mM c0e 70 Dn u CO N O M n M W r O �" n W O M R' CD O O O M W O O m M m n M aD u d W r M M CDD .rr fC O`D a O r r M a 0 W �.. W M O M OC W O O W co ch r V 0 ONMH O Md0OD Oa tooM4000OD DOMnM Ma �0 O OW O O O aM n W e O C n' co N Q' O Ono O W w m N N M d N d O r r M aD O O n C M N O co, 0 r a r M N 04 60 0 o J O h W) m c) O n Goo .n O o eo n M °D ' -" -D to N v' m C m N O C 0 to n �D '_: to h M W e -a ao O IL O O W r M M N r• co -_ n W G m ao N - a O W" M M e_ h Q' nO W O M N n c0 `O Q n N O M aD [V t0 O Z i.� O�Mm.,t �MONM t .00f MOO o F-�nO W�-ten F- e ._ .' a' m a 0 0 O �- W �- O M co n N :�: a O O W .O- M N m j Cr p O M M n "; d' m O N 0 0 tv ..:i d o r y Mto Q 7 O � .� N m N N +J �: 7 0 M O It n ..► A m N m N --i ©-.O!n ND OOC OS2m o m hDDa�_MNY d O M OA M V �M'oN Cid O r r ;; W O t' p W r M v `t r 2 a OGMCO')AMeo n O�- O ►` O G. r c a QrD Qaoo.ro.r� oo-Qoovov w w flQovov tLto O -v i7 �V-.moo a Q © f6 a oN_MN�- N Y M n O NNMnOn -.s O O F.- O r N �►- Q F- Y O r r N w- Q '!7'. 0CD �. vOa N A 0 n g "t Q O r r r M r C CS` M V O r r m O n I 4 Q c V O O r r rNi O =L _Rl M- o Q . a aJEfF Q M w r w F- O F- ` m w m w o o w M w ~ Q w � a into Q tonaoF- d mt/J O F- (L -tom O �Oa �m nroGo to MO to p <ronDoto O m la-t RID �mn W CD 10 a 0 0 N m .G O V O z O U w O a F - z w 2 J J O it z w I - z w F N F- U 1- h O J O O U to z m a O th 0— C-4 CO CS O no -11 O -4N -.3, co co Ciao anYh arNM an M7 `Of Mfpf MY It m Co. � m o n O� W CD O .n- m m Q nw M O Y�t 'f 'l") � n CD "W - co m ar a' M m N a�- Ym x m a1 N a NM - N N am'f.,rMf.. O �_- am C t9' ate'_ o N m m O; S. -a M O�oN 0 C3, 'Mcoala.n �m unm amMat am't� �hQ/N a NM X°Wq 000 Ym)CMD OW, oM 0 a�..r�v am chv 0 O �m O� mn O-'�� 04 to I�a-wo �min Mo O io -�vs C-1). C> ccn Z a�coao �v� a. -`t vo a NMNM N Q�"Mf pf�Y O"- a� c+>Y O 10,�" U O�nm 0:4 C,4 NM OnO°n vm '.V-NMNM�W m CIC V4 CD a�-NMNM �T�iaMohaMD It O`- v� a a - 0 O a _ O''�m M O�MO n O OMnvoDn co ODD �N OD C4 00 O N Oo N OD �M �N. O n Z OD aD a a "tm a' A r a1 O a NMNM co a�-`f.°Dtvle [C� �v lu CL J J OZ: t- to O-.O°t h ir;-no0 O :;,AD C4 O�-,DD N.'DD "' �N .�-h aaoao ar-.�m CL MMMM Ir W), QD.hrY ZZ tee-- MM o IL�- Z W �� O Go -W �� O� m0 O� �i�i Th O_�MNw �r On z alma, n. CD, a��M�c ��.hr.nr.'ary a �o rNi60 a O CD jr W 0OD C.I. O n m a W Q O °D n co n O— W O m m O (� p COa1 n of ao �v o: W o 0 0 0 a o MMMM N m N ao"nt pt.nt.°Dt O N Vrroi Ua a c E OeaMotMam cr CO oe mmvnaMi 00 Oo coaMao V) o M 0 'oaoaoao O N Baa vnma "� C* a p 00 O 00 00 n aD n co a 0 '? Y V "t a O M M M M M N aD M CO m a 0 O m N r. O "go t 'f a O M Cb W) � J O M O O O 00 r CO nn M 00 'C at N O mm 'D OD Y a) Y W Oen n 00 O�cM,m�m vmNn .�0. a O OD W 00 00 a: .0M a O 'f Y a O N M N M a h to oo M M U 0 m )D a p M M r .- .- t/1 � Z tC O rpE o n ao co co 0 n Mcoonn o co cD O� ocoo.0 0 n® o M o O�v)mm� -a n O�mhmmn po cv�rN m a C maoMeo aov v go .0 aovoiroivoivoi aM0000 o °- o�nmmm rcoic°DoC� a •- D Q cOs. � CD 0, rno cwo00 a oo 12a CD K)omo 0oM NnNn M M M M OQ�OOD FOOD ' C nnC 0 _= p 00 aD 00 M a OD Go co a 0 Y Y v Y a O M M M M aD OD CO aDn�l CL O V 'r' V _ do lM M 7 0. M W Z Q O N N N N (g;W� wo)aoao Q Q O M M M M - '7'f `t"t J Q "t .� Y Q D M M M Ment - nn O QDmmM o n nnn _- U C M OD M Op ILiC Q O Q G Y 'MM .r. 'M7 O O tlN! M M M O U O Y Y CO YM V O CO M OM '> V) O 0 O Q ix Q Q J W QvZ W o <M O <� m O Q i QMlO�m aD W _U QM 0'Q')Q W �- cQfQ O•-ro�cD aQiQ Vr mem O a �t/itAt7tA a2SS2 MM�m Y W W W W C7 W W W W (� ��� (DL to col vi m vi vi O th tom, veva eevo .e :.c: o x xx o e O O p ci n V*1 ci e cu ? n o x n t'), A M a tco ? o v v v O O O O O O O C r n n n W QQ nh 7w0' -m W toOm Cl) nm DQ�ah�ath m •D N #N 'NvO MN N n mn nM mWo mO p NWQnO nO rtN`o am�mop amD-mmm NNNlNN Ci[ p N,N„_�N-- eN-` O O ' •. o a a ton wm �� o at ¢ ^ m Y M N e N N N h aYD. h e N01 a00 O O O O r O r O p t0 O C N �- $��w W m N M _n pert oma0 vchN ama0 xaomaoro to'►-�nM npomtn L C r m N N O m M n N Z j d m � r m m N N M O v m O '? IV. M N .aO V W Q Co C.i m amD an0 ano tp W W aW0 m� 'O' m O to _ N h W M t0 m to r M O m tD; m m t0 N N: N N N N iV N N N � N NH.r r } } a O O � o o m v M h � M W 5=== o� oo r v riv co r r" �KIxtr m n n Ob m xxx m 'J 4 '� X m m M '� � M O N O � ,'—k O� O Y �� j� O M n JO }�} mmD Nm' v �D M V My mmD �n�n mQ $ � a'pMtO V m m m r W lK �m O m:: mRM m M ►8- CO.; ,.�2�-`` rNrommM aomaoom aaa Aaoao oM=YtvieiriM om :.mCI04 N N N W a wtMq tmmO - -- xx v o a o e p o e e e v o v e e - X t� m ►� c0.�- O O o O 1h _M M b O r O r O O O O U? W W v v v u OD t:w m O o > > aoo0 rmi �v, �O �NvN -O aMo rowm m0 c. .0 > o m `o $ O v .�.. m O A n .�. n t0 m t0; m jp n 0 m �D� m N W N: O !!� Z Y' O v t0 t0 tA. t0 O^ I,- co n n O N M :l�vt. M O t0 m CO m m OD to i" N N N N:.N 12 N N N N.N H r Sir j D � �.. Q Q O O a tO N 0 0 a to ao m oo M v M �f c o o e .� 7 X n O N n �f h Y h Cl! N n O h 0 co 00 0 Q C, ID 10 CD. thtvthCIO o000 D a s M M Q O o o c Lt o0 of o' �c °D ago o E c�D :�Y Im S2�o..m a� rhnh a0 �mv� o m o Ota CL . i �_.� .�Q■ o Fon NONmCD CD aommom:onm mr _ m.tmoC4lN MN � rC4Mto to m m ci NN N 1O - r uj -i to Q t4r m a Q 7 4D. wN_j Cl)C m� m - � Q Qm D. c�11't MM LU V) _0 F'- MtW9Mcw7 v �tU tiJ LL1 LL1 o:j LU LLl LLI IIJ ���� MMM _1 ~ O Y Q a a a a` O n Q d a d a C9 .; Q a a a a < 01< a a a a` W M lq O O N m .0 r v O fA Z 0 W O w a I— Z W J J O K 2 W I— Z W N v oc J O O U N Z 0.' m 4 q o A � A U `O C C M Lo C* r j I'S a Q U U Q � j Y Co r- 0 - 000OW oo°o i Z=xIr= U 6 tl m c� aQi Q r m r m M M M M aan.a s0 C _ �<< � roo m G O 6 CL o 0 z QSv o ~ U c c .2 .2 � 0 0 Q Q O � CL a a o O za vcortl a O N n W a00 O n n c;W Owl to 1-_ m aD t0 Qhamo m000 O O y iV � •� X n m N N r nom mug tl 10 N O tl w m m.tl n m O m :co co m b Q T' tp r < o J W W W W OYQda CL O r N 4 tfmn n Op SS22�Nb� o •- N IM W i� W O N N M l-.* 0 o o m f tl N M), V N ox m i m 0 o w � $ a N m N Cl W M,f M I o .o' o c O M M C 0Y n m 0 o e b n tN !Ei v c W W W O o r W hN:�nm Oo. wco o M N N N N �meo. i�n 0 s � X O tY O N e0 SC eoaoaom 40 o W W W w O M N N N N J r r Q D w w w w I Q M M M M ` U r c Q a a a a o m o & O =.—W v r W ca.M W l! M M M CO P1 �O�S2�v�vM W J�;NnN co co ��Y��N N co f-' - J M M Q aDCW1W1010 Qaa aa` O 0 0 0 0 e Y n N l7 vvn C—:11 QwNroamo N N M W_iq n �vr,nv H -- e o 0 0 o M W h r C? o�ys�n M N W�°°�ton f*- t0 b RI' m m vcortl a O N n W a00 O n n c;W Owl to 1-_ m aD t0 Qhamo m000 O O y iV � •� X n m N N r nom mug tl 10 N O tl w m m.tl n m O m :co co m b Q T' tp r < o J W W W W OYQda CL O r N 4 tfmn n Op SS22�Nb� o •- N IM W i� W O N N M l-.* 0 o o m f tl N M), V N ox m i m 0 o w � $ a N m N Cl W M,f M I o .o' o c O M M C 0Y n m 0 o e b n tN !Ei v c W W W O o r W hN:�nm Oo. wco o M N N N N �meo. i�n 0 s � X O tY O N e0 SC eoaoaom 40 o W W W w O M N N N N J r r Q D w w w w I Q M M M M ` U r c Q a a a a o m o & O =.—W v r W ca.M W l! M M M CO P1 �O�S2�v�vM W J�;NnN co co ��Y��N N co f-' - J M M Q aDCW1W1010 Qaa aa` O � C O O �. O CL W C 0 p 2 CL p q a s Ec m t/1 N 0 0 W c n E O c o c 0 ' 0 o S m � E CL O 2 Y n Q c 0 N a � w 2 o ,mQ ta 00 O Y Yir • o e p e e o e e o e O 0 d% p Ott 0 "C � o xX mob X O O N O � o xxmeD►�a0 O X n h n h e e e e O e W m N 0 a x e e ee e x g O q Z L > m m m Q 0 0 0 0 > v N �.: Q v > Q M N 'V' N O X Cl! Q C O O L III co Q U V ���Y p xx mQ Xv��q CO. Op vm m o xjx� Oo S2Na-V- 0 O fix( <n OM Q Q > > 0 x N � N N O asa�w� a a F ►� 1^ Yxe V 04 a .n- co a0 �f l9 C3, a z �$ e e e e W Z ==a� = o� c 0 �o�0 v Q0000 06 Wi Q Nma�O.N .-.- o.- a�iQQiQ�Jdr. } W} W 4 Witi 0 j� o� o qq -� ���m Q�?co�1'D 00aoomomaoo N 0 �°yDa� r m aD N H O N N N �- N W m m to q aD Go M .4 n n Gor'-OD g O q 0 _ 40 N N M O A OD O iDi N `f N O �-- n _ t ti MOCors st M M M M aD b aD aD m O .R M M M M M- O A M 03' O M M M i s ap Co. n a0 .�. w W aaaaa ~ D y pe xxv ee e �c ee° e ED eeee M A eeee- a h n 00'1 V? N O 3 � U U Q Q 0 m q e0 Y X 1( m m t- m `� 7( NM •f 7k .�v N NM MN MSm N -Npp Nt�! N�O CO No00 q 70 N N J �' a 0 0 O qN NY•`:O _ a0 N M P O (D CD W w ro maDOlffO _ q a0 O O aD 0a ary A - M n Nl n .� N O:.�. CO k, ;; W a Z p O �! O M M MAi M o t7 aM�1 - {N+1 . rf Z V ,Z 0' Q Qac c c F F o ~ t' e p Z �� o U c C e v e a �v v - e e e e a noho e e e e a Ie a 000 Qtoo m OR C0+1, a �m �amo m =± r 0 0 Q 0 o C6 'i 0rzo6n o0 00 CL jL L1: S E L'1 O xx O X o O p M O M r M r M N N W N M N xx n M m ($".. V p O O X O .N. — v p� N N N N O o 0 X g O q O Z 4. N N N � N is. m' N A M 10 ado co `aM0 m co m_ ID aD a0 00 T. aD'v aD q "r; qCM ol v �` M O O N'- O N M M O- m M N co ft; ao a07 M- W J q 110. Q •" m r m o D IL W ui W n p -� +" co m aaD. - j LLl W LLl W J M _..: r Q Q aD CD p' Q m o m Q+ aD` F- M M M M U r r r r b ,i'A F• M M M M '< U c r r r -' M M M M o~ ' W W W V) V M co eo F- UYi<a- O�"Qaaas (5.-Urrrr Qa_aaa --., QC1:¢a`a`a`a` Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN . Enrollment Projections 42 P, F V W LL nnr0u� OO t0 OD M 0 It � m O O O P O O O I O co It 00 MIM M - O O O10 Ez 3 0 L L N m m o o a m RJ..ul 0 afi C 0 c E U0 1 tv, o c1b Aid: Q. aaro�c m e o F M o g 4 o E a O M c a to r . =aoa� C14 me� eh +° e a Po�`'o N u a a -0 m a a mAs .. o c a 4 s o � a a 4 MQ m 0 o O 4 3 d v 0Y 0 4c oDacc� M ` C 0 0 M N O O O w W a m04 h W !h M wI-W -m- � - Y wrq DOS T T 0 0 0 M Y00 O N O M M in t- -INV 01) VM* OO OO M V t` O N M- O M co O M 0 00 w 0 r N N N N OF r r r ,--*;! h W r MM OQm MwAUao MMODM00 Tr 1D3I`w0 NMM ON rov .r co W to in. I- In 40 0o 00 1.- 0 W W O r N MMEw 1O n w M�TY00 000 W) W), N W W O r r T r 00 r NNNMM MM07 •AMM O m 1 r 7 b� C? Om O Y O r �ONDmW�Tb NNS I mmhC' C Q 00 W W w w< T 3 N N V r C 4 Ii{� 'at Ov o V w ■ p 'o Or(V (h e�tp (O t-aO Y IL r r r N r I t 04 O N CL d O C r r r r as Vo P 3o d �Mcc°m �o\ o tl O C O 0 Z1�COty�'q� IM�O0 00'D 1p 00 '10000 1p I, m J co 11"04 QNOEQ0 r O V) C, C's LD =o c T r 4 of t- OD 01pN00 �MV1�r N - mT O aTN l"> NOON O >OOOrr r N N omm r Ii{� 'at NO o O NQ M� � M A O O n r r r N r I t 04 O N c r r r r r r r 47. DW 0 DO CO C 0 VO' 000 VoO �o\ O ld U b Cl) N IM�O0 00'D 1p 00 '10000 1p I, m coN^ OM0 0 co T r r O V) C, C's Co T r r r T , r tO r a tD o O w cob 0 r T- cb O O r r r O r � NrtoN V wOM GO O0 M co Cl) W 0400 eO 00 MN's M w 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 v C4 p N ODY N M N T 0 O M M O� d. W Q W O O O m r r m W 00 I.-- W W w�O N N M- r r m Y T r0 Vco qlF QR �-04M'Q'U'J (Of -CD L O p 0 O v t - > O :O m U to NO o S. .2 Et o too 0, Oot c ,0I 4 O c N U yc0 tayyYl, VoO �o\ /0 O YI ld U aD W c IM�O0 U � 1=�0 Q d1 01 Y .o V o 3 It It Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey 45 Aubum School District Single Family Development Growth since 1/1/99 46 1 1 2 4 23 12 8 43 22 10 10 42 0 0 2 2 ) 15 6 10 31 ' 7 2 0 9 21 6 12 39 34 1826 78 13 6 11 30 6 5 10 21 23 5 8 36 15 -7-7 29 19 4 7 30 2 1 1 4 23 12 11 46 24 17 13 54 11 6 17 34 14 11 14 39 4 4 2 10 2 2 0 4 13 8 16 37 1 2 2 5 39 20 22 81 8 7 7 22 8 2 2 12 1 1 0 2 10 4 3 17 15 4 3 22 7 2 0 9 24 11 9 44 7 1 1 9 8 2 1 11 8 6 3 17 46 26 25 97 38 23 17 78 733 361 372 1466 0.3216 0.1584 0.1632 0.6433 Elementaf Middle High Total 111 55 56 1 223 Aubum School District Single Fanw'fy Devebpment Growth since 1/1/99 2005 Aprik 21105 HZ01 Auburn Place 14 -0-14 14 LH04 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 HZ01 Cambridge Pante 26 0 26 HZ01 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 HZ04 Dawson Hills 6 0 6 AL01 Hansen Development 31 0 31 HZ01 Hazel Park 15 0 15 GR00 Lakeland: Future 181 0 181 GR00 Lakeland: Thuline 9595 0 109 LV07/0 Little Fields 8 0 8 LH04 Marchini Meadows 83 0 83 LV07 Mystery Heights 6 0 6 AL01 Parc Meadows 44 0 44 WA02 Plemmons Development g 0 8 HZ01 River Rim 0 12 EH06 Rive irate 12 12 HZ0 White Mountain Trails E12 30 HE �c 2006 and Un 30 Elements dle MidHi h Totat 602 194 1 95 98 387 LV05 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 IL02 Aspen Meadows 21 0 21 EH04 Auburn 40 600 0 600 LH04 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 LH06 Brandon Place 78 0 78 HZ01 Dant Dhaliwal Plat 81 8 LH04 Harpreet Kang g 0 8 HZ01 Hazel View -109 20 0 20 LH04 Kendall Ridge 0 109 HZ01 Kent Impound Area 376 0 376 GR04 Kersey 3 Project 403 0 403 HZ03 Potter Plat!251 .0 33 LH06 Vin Place 0 25 LH04 Willow, Place 1810 � too 47 18 Elements Middle High Total 1768 569 280 1 28-9 1 J7 Projected Additional Students -to EMiddle Hi h Total M4301 4431 747 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/99 April, 2005 MULTI FAMILY Geo Code Development Name Units/ Parcels Current cupanc To Be occupied IL02 Che Meadows 16 16 0 GR00 Emerald Pointe Lakeland: Capn 93 168 93 132 0 36 IL01 Lakeland: Foxwood Townhomes 69 69 0 LH06 Lakeland: Heatherwood To wnh 92 92 0 GR00 Lakeland: Mill Pond Apartments Lakeland: Siena 123 73 123 0 0 73 6 7 Meadow Valle Condominiums 78 78 0 138 Pasa Fina Apartments 147 147 0 M Village Square Townhomes qAl QA ----Al 953 109 Student Generation Factors 2005 GR03 "D" Street Plat 32 0 32 IL02 Faehnrich Addition 7 0 7 GR00 Lakeland: Future 168 0 168 IL01 Lakeland: Vista Heights 38 0 38 LH06 Worley Condominiums 4 0 5 Elem 6 Middle 7 2 Total 15 3 3 EHS 8 14 1 02 3 2 1 2 1 2 J20 12 4 4 0 5 1 4 3 6 4 15 10 16 8 9 6 7 24 32 58 39 41 138 0.0462 0.0486 0.1635 M Middle High Total 5 5 18 19 0 19 Elementar Middle High I Total 264 264 18 12 13 1 43 Total Efementa Middle High Total 26 17 18 61 48 P/T #2 Incorporate Kent School District Updated 2005- 06 to 2010-2011 Capital Facilities Plan as part of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Kent School District Board of Directors July 27, 2005.) IIIIIAi FACIiITIES It BIT SeN00L misTRICT NO, 411 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary Serving VnincorporatedKing County and Kent, Covington, 4u6urn, 9Yapfe Valley, Black Diamond,, Denton, SeaTac, Washington Aprif2005 Kent School District 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 - 2006 - 2010 - 2011 KENT 000 DISTRICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Lisa Holliday Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. - Superintendent Fred H. High - Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. - Assistant Superintendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney — Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, Kentwood Strand Donald Hall — Executive Director of Information Technology John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Joseph McBrayer, Ph.D. — Executive Director, Kentlake Strand Gary Plano, Ed.D. — Executive Director, Kent -Meridian Strand Merri Rieger — Executive Director, Kentridge Strand Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 KENT SCHOOL O Srx[eT, SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 - 2006 - 2010 - 2011 April 2005 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Larry Price, Director of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup & Helen Shindell-Butler, Transportation Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 KentDistrict school Si.X- `Year CapitaCEaciCities Plan 7a6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection 4 III District Standard of Service g I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 11 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2005 for the 2004-2005 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2004 was 26,891. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,770.44. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2004, full head count was 27,340. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.34% of 22,487 King County live births in 2000 is forecast for 1,876 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2005. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.34% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (see Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") and non -disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with alternative funding for the second half of the day. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and a small portion of the city of Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city limits of Black Diamond and Kent Mountain View Academy is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR (Continued) "Student Factor' is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Multi -Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Total Elementary Middle School Senior High Total The student generation factor is based on a dwelling units and 2,701 multi -family dwelling occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Student Generation Factor survey. .482 .161 .284 .293 .069 .114 927 .476 survey of 4,219 single family units with no adjustment for Pages 35-36 for details of the The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 4,219 single family dwelling units there were 2,035 elementary students, 679 middle school students, and 1,197 senior high students for a total of 3,911 students. In 2,701 multi -family dwelling units, there were 791 elementary students, 186 middle school students, and 308 senior high students, for a total of 1,285 students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 5 0 W J LLJ 0 ~ :L U co) N N Za W Y W m 0 U 0 0) m c m J OD I c m J T c m J m c m J 0) 1 _C ED J v _rn c m J C') rn c m J 0) c m J 0) rn m J 0 rn C m J c m J co m rn CD J OD rn m J 00 0) m J U3 C m J CD L m 1 J 31 m J C) 0 O M N O LO .10 rn N O N O CD 0 N O ti � r r � N O r 0,0 LOODN N O O o r O lD N O LOM N N O O OD 0 OD r M N O N O M N CO It o O � N O r 0 L N O O O 0 N r O N m 0 V- N O 0 0 a � 0) (f) 04 00O OD of r o7 N � o m L N r ] m J � ac) c m U w N rnv c c Y Y O N M Lo Cl) IA N IT Cn M LO N M M Cl) LO N OO M N to N O CD O CO N N 00 OD C' N O CO In N N CA ti M N Cl) N M Cl) N v O N N Cl) O M N N N N N N N _N M N C!) eM-- 0 N M LO LQ (o O a CO LO N CO L _ 0) CO m CD f- o co ao co r co L N M N (D Cl) � M M 0) co LQ t CI) C) V C) ti Lq M N tf) Co co )O )P) M a) M O m O Cl) co 'IT O N Co (o rn rn m co cli C. m N O) (6 a O O N .Q Q M u) M N 0 O M It N O N_ C) 'MV CA O) O Cl � � N N a V �- N N N N N N N N •- Nr to co � � ccoo O O (A O 0 0~0 CMD 0) co O) � O O N N M Cl) N1- 'It e'- r N N N N N N N r Cl) Cl) N cM7 (� CMO 'T Lo 000 I` O M 1- 00 CA CA C O M C O 00 r M �-- N N N N N N N N - r CO 1- O (O O M N V' IT Co O M 0 It0 0 In 'IT Cl) Cl) O O) O O r _ N 04 r N O M "t O r N N N N N N N N N .- r O) O 00 (D O 00 Cl) 0o Cl) O N O O .-0) 00 Cn 0 O Cl) O P- Cl) O O0 O O N O N O N � � rt O N N N N N N N CV N N r z N N 00 � NMO) 0M 0 �(O7 Cl)CA O N O C! O � t� O0 N N N N N N N N N r r V (O 00 Cn OJ (O Cl) O LO M O N NCD O O It O IT O I` N M d' Cl) O O N (D O O 0) O) Cl 00 (0 O N N N N N N N _- r Cl .- .- M -t 00 V co) O N (Dt- � 00 O )O (D N M 00 M M ti O O O O O O O O O 0) O 1- CO CA N N N N N N r � .- r r N 0) (O (D 00 It 0) 1- M SO _ M 1- N CO Co N 0) N (D M Op (o 0) O 0) 0) 0) 00 0) O) M CD 'tet CA N N e r � 1 r r r r r O N V CO tO V CO O O M_ O Or- 0 co N 0) O O) C) a) Oo m 0) Op (p r (N - N � �. r 1- r_ r r_ .- r � CO N O) M (D N O O 0) co LO CO M CD V CA It 00 O O N (O CA CA 0) CA oc O) CA M CO (o M M M N M � Co O (D 00 ti O O � Cl) N O N N CA � 1` ( CLO M N N - c- .- - - r - r .- r M M O C) .- M N It O) M O O N O N 0) N N CA OMO o0 n (MD CMO N N r - r - r .- r .-- - r - 0 V 0 (D U) M O CO N O O COI 01 C Ci M OMO C l OMO � � cc (D N Nm V Cl) N C3) O Cl) O0 O N O 0 N N m O N N ct 00 CD (o O 00 o0 1` w 1-- � Co CO (O It "t M N C cu cur N M C17 (0 � 00 O O r r r 04 m N N N N N N N N N m -p "C3 'd 70 '6 _0 '6 "O '0 'd 'D U U C m m m m (`0 (`0 (`0 m co (cQ (`0 (LQ Y C9 0 C7 CD (D U 0 CD C9 C7 0 CD O N M Lo Cl) IA N IT Cn M LO N M M Cl) LO N OO M N to N O CD O CO N N 00 OD C' N O CO In N N CA ti M N Cl) N M Cl) N v O N N Cl) O M N N N N N N N _N M N C!) eM-- 0 N M LO LQ (o O a CO LO N CO L _ 0) CO m CD f- o co ao co r co L N M N (D Cl) � M M 0) co LQ t CI) C) V C) ti Lq M N tf) Co co )O )P) M a) M O m O Cl) co 'IT O N Co (o rn rn m co cli C. m N O) (6 a O O N .Q Q KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births' 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,500 22,600 ' Increase / Decrease -188 480 -709 85 568 69 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.34% 8.34% 8.34% 8.34% 8.34% 8.34% 8.34% 2/3 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 918 938 918 922 945 948 952 Grade 1 1,954 1,986 2,060 2,017 2,025 2,076 2,082 Grade 2 1,935 2,023 2,085 2,163 2,118 2,126 2,179 Grade 3 2,020 1,969 2,090 2,153 2,234 2,187 2,196 Grade 4 2,057 2,084 2,062 2,188 2,253 2,338 2,289 Grade 5 2,102 2,067 2,123 2,101 2,229 2,295 2,381 Grade 6 2,139 2,155 2,149 2,207 2,185 2,317 2,385 Grade 7 2,243 2,176 2,202 2,196 2,255 2,232 2,366 Grade 8 2,221 2,255 2,197 2,223 2,217 2,276 2,253 Grade 9 5 2,705 2,542 2,606 2,539 2,569 2,562 2,630 Grade 10 2,124 2,475 2,349 2,408 2,346 2,373 2,367 Grade 11 1,907 1,822 2,148 2,040 2,091 2,037 2,060 Grade 12 1,446 1,543 1,484 1,748 1,660 1,702 1,658 Total FTE Enrollment 25,771 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 27,469 27,798 Note: 2/3/4 Yearly Increase 413 264 438 432 222 342 329 Yearly Increase % 1.60% 1.02% 1.68% 1.63% 0.83% 1.26% 1.20% Cumulative Increase 413 677 1,115 1,547 1,769 2,111 2,440 .­......­............. ................ ...... .............. ..................... .... Full Time E uivalent FTE 25,771 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 27,469 27,798 ' Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births. 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. 4 Oct. 2004 P223 FTE is 25,771 & Headcount is 26,891. Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,340. 5 Grade level reconfiguration. In 2004, all 9th grade students were served at the senior high schools. G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Ad ustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2005 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (see Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior -disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities (DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten (Magnet K Programs) Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (cont'd.) Kent School District six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Learners (E L L) Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc. Business Education — Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DECA, Sales & Marketing, etc. Material Sciences — Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machine Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic & Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades K - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 10 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 26,978 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,843. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes at elementary schools and Kentlake High School. It has also been updated to estimate new capacity for building additions at the other three high schools. It excludes capacity for the temporary closure of Kent Junior High which will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School in the fall of 2005. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K - 12. The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementary, Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2005 Page 12 2004-2 005 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity aci Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 416 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -1 80th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 480 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 466 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 490 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 490 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 480 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 428 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 468 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 466 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 538 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 492 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 442 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 384 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 498 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 540 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 478 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 418 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 440 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,290 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 949 Kent Junior High (Closed for 1 Year) 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 -0- Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 808 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Meridian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 747 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 944 Sequoia Middle School 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 830 Middle School TOTAL 5,168 Kent -Meridian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,803 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,812 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,302 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,187 Senior High TOTAL 8,104 Kent Mountain View Academy Z 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 26,978 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K - 12. The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elementary, Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2005 Page 12 S e�1etu� Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan .o YL ow CL YS N �a Y N /U V W U Q O O O N cV O Cnn �—U O -C -C C U 0 :3 C a) _ Ec: O c co Cnn Y W i*I IqN April 2005 Page 13 Z. 0 z O �c 0 C d O •� d of .�Q Y c D Uao Y _ o g o Nwho 0) O � mCaV asl > 0 �LV� �OO 0 UVU mU '0 N4) TT m 00 �ml .�� •C m 0 U� • C o f �W gym• Y • U� U0 `C Y C UW y M mE U m • E• 3 m 0 mU m C T +EC'Oo O0 om w O o C� oC w �m U— 'O ` • CD > 003'- ��• sc • W ;� 0 o •y2 Um• 3N m ti L 3Sa^V4lV9L c cw z0 S '0 p U as �� N 2 3y pec oc �E• >m T o0 D 0 y �0 W Ym T 8. 2m T •O O ��p 22 3SenV4JOdl N c0 m� L to �',E �.w N Om NE U0 Yn •w uwi 2w a m m o m 3S BBV PUZE l 'EE �U m0 o T E- 7d 3S aAV PUZ£ l OP Ow •, '0U Um• n• CL Oen U p • Ccm C Cm mO mC �m ), h m` EL y Om OIO m01 >u- •'� m y= d O mm �'O U •CU ]E OOm ym •_C _mm �w • Ot U� mm O aw �w mE• CP � a Q oC 3: C, • Q w ww oE• y •arc •Qm mW �• w 3SenVLUPOL •y0`, aw w EE 04)0 y.0 Bmm joC• �E =T cameo °• YDSL• 3S9AVgW0t m � E ow m u WE � L T • `0 £ m yw 0-0 y ONE =C Sm N W To UU 0m ww N =-0 ii • ii r9 �O any 1014Uao CCIj Z N A—L451H /6110A JSaM • �• 00 NUC 000 yC m L Tm E D N j Z w e u' O\t` S e�1etu� Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan .o YL ow CL YS N �a Y N /U V W U Q O O O N cV O Cnn �—U O -C -C C U 0 :3 C a) _ Ec: O c co Cnn Y W i*I IqN April 2005 Page 13 V Six Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2005, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • The Board authorized grade level reconfiguration to move 9th grade students to high schools and serve 7th and 8th grade students at middle schools. Additions to three high schools have added capacity for additional students from new development and 9th Grade students moving to the high schools. • Reconfiguration to 7th and 8th grades provides additional capacity at middle schools effective in September 2004. • The Board approved temporary closure of Kent Junior High for re -purpose and remodel. In 2004-05, students from KJH are attending other middle schools since all 9th grade students moved to the high schools. Kent Junior High is expected to re -open as Mill Creek Middle School (# 7a) with a 7th Grade Technology Academy in September 2005. • Enrollment trends continue to show an increase in enrollment. Projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level. Facility needs are reflected in this Plan pending preliminary review. • Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull- outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see rabie 4) The voter approved bond issue for $105.4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2002 voter approval of $69.5 million bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for additions to three high schools and some impact fees have also been applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Status ProjectedLProjected 386 % for Completion Moved 9th grade to High School new Date Growth Approximate I Appro dirrW ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)To be determined 2 New Planning 2009 500 75% MIDDLE SCHOOL 386 75% Grade Level Reconfiguration has Moved 9th grade to High School Program Planning provided additional capacity at Middle Schools 896 SENIOR HIGH 2010 1,000 Classroom additions at three Kent -Meridian Additions construction high schools and reconfiguration Kentridge Additions construction moved 9th Grade to high school Kentwood Additions construction Senior High #5 (Unfunded) ' To be determined 2 New Planning 2004 N/A N/A 2004 386 75% 2004 1,000 75% 2004 896 75% 2010 1,000 75% Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2004+ 24 - 31 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent -Meridian High School New Planning TBD 2 N / A # on Land Use Map F 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 TBD 2 City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD 2 King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave. SE, Kent TBD 2 King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16. Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2005 Page 15 Lo W qqcr 6 Z m opo ■� y m y CAD` O N • O W O. ti Q O y U ov1 c CL mU m Y =m �0 O O c y m� C o� Cn mT 0D Ui > m w C of o o o� • �w O 60• o Y • J w` �� C C • m E U- ��13 c> m O • COC mUm p� L M YN OQ C C� Om o DO OL m W C > OE UN h 0 • -0,-06 �N pU mL W • © op m • •Y _o, x a�a g 'D 3 u 6 N OAV O E0 �m € 3S £ 4{V9L c O m0 cw O- Z o O � iD6 N � O�y8,�0 O gym• CP im > o0 m 0 ti 8E mE pc LLN W ym Ow T NO m '� mE T •O • O `-^C L 3SenV410dt m� O N nm " •w 04) om v g 60 • W N xw am U mN 2� > 3S eAV PUZ£ t c- > E 3S aAV PUZ£ L pm WL m� UE• 'OL • O �� �O W c •� > ao` uoi• m0 �m C m pm 0� mE m �0- •�m mm Y= yTom alJmW D •-a �vOu •.�w EU • U= cm co aw O c m_m �W L3� Om• > LO 2 in �' _0 Q 0 OL 3m • O 00 mm `m OE• S •� • o`n Om `• m EW ``r cE h 3S eAV 41801 • o a 1 `" ow N� 0 o 6 m -' c 0 ao 3S eAV 44V01 47 .0c• [pm }E cm �ofi1L C O YU1L• U •> + CE aW WOE O mm0 m N _ xo .p N w (DA om W w U'O m m • N !9 OAV 1014U0O "0 (!O • C w Z AOtALINH /anon {SaM m• c• -> mm m 6 Y C: L ot m >m E r 3 mEm C v m S mm W ZW 0 �E 6 cU 0 5_ .Eoo Pe Y Q • S 0{D{S1glUl Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan ti M © W April 2005 Page 16 V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used also references use of portables or capacity/facilities. interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan relocatables as interim or transitional Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Appendices A 8 C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 17 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the "enrollment count date" for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2004 was 25,770.44 which represents an increase of 413 FTE over the previous year. Kindergarten students are counted at .5 and P223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College -only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & 5A -B -C on pages 19-22) On October 1, there were 535 students in 11th and 12' grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 261 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are thus excluded from the FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2004 was 26,891 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2004 totals 27,340 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. This reflects an increase of 470 actual students compared to October 1, 2003. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 19 - 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT Permanent Program Capacity' 25,512 26,978 27,778 27,778 27,778 27,778 28,278 New Permanent Construction ' Estimated Program Capacity 4 Kent Junior High closed 1 year for remodel & re -purposing in 2004-05 - Will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fall 2005 -816 800 Additions to 3 Senior High schools 2,282 Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 6 500 Senior High # 5 (Unfunded) 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 1 2009 -2010 1 2010-2011 Actual P R O J E C T E D 27,778 27,778 27,778 Permanent Program Capacity' 25,512 26,978 27,778 27,778 27,778 27,778 28,278 New Permanent Construction ' Estimated Program Capacity 4 Kent Junior High closed 1 year for remodel & re -purposing in 2004-05 - Will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fall 2005 -816 800 Additions to 3 Senior High schools 2,282 Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 6 500 Senior High # 5 (Unfunded) 6 1,000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 26,978 27,778 27,778 27,778 27,778 28,278 29,278 Interim Relocatable Ca aci Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 48 288 96 264 Middle School Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 93 279 496 651 589 589 0 Total Relocatable Capacity Required' 5 93 279 496 699 877 685 264 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 27,071 1 28,057 1 28,274 1 28,477 I 28,655 I 28,963 1 29 2 & 3 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 1 25,771 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 27,469 27,798 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 1,300 2,022 1,801 1,572 1,528 1,494 1.744 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (i.e. 1/2 day Kindergarten student = .5). 3 In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which provided increased capacity at Middle School level. 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel and re -purposing in 2004-05 with students served at five other Middle Schools. KJ will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas. Capacity for Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy will be determined when new programs are in place. 5 2004-2005 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,843. 6 Facility needs are pending review. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2005 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 .............................................. SCHOOL YEAR 3 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 1 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 Actual P R O J E C T E D 589 589 0 Senior High Permanent Program Capacity' 5,822 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 New Permanent Senior High Construction 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade students moved to high schools in Fall 2004 Classrooms added at three high schools Estimated program capacity 2,282 Senior High # 5 (Unfunded) 4 1,000 Subtotal 8,1U4 8,1U4 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 9,104 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 4 93 279 496 651 589 589 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 8,197 8,383 8,600 8,755 8,693 8,693 9.104 FTE ENROLLMENT! PROJECTION 213 I 8,182 8,382 8,587 8,735 8,666 8,674 8,715 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 15 1 13 20 27 19 Number of Relocatables Required 3 9 16 21 19 19 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Facility needs are pending review. 389 0 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2005 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 Middle School Program Capacity 5,984 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 New Capacity from Grade Reconfiguration 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade students moved to high schools in 2004 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel & re -purposing in 2004-05 - Will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fall 2005 Estimated program capacity -816 800 Subtotal 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY'&3 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,464 4,431 4,399 4,419 4,472 4,508 4,619 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 704 1 1,569 1,549 1,496 1,460 1 No Relocatables Required ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel and re -purposing in 2004-05 with students served at five other Middle Schools. KJ will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas. Capacity for Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy will be determined when new programs are in place. April 2005 Page 21 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B SCHOOL YEAR 3 2004-2005 2005-2009 1 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Program Capacity 5,984 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 New Capacity from Grade Reconfiguration 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade students moved to high schools in 2004 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel & re -purposing in 2004-05 - Will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fall 2005 Estimated program capacity -816 800 Subtotal 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY'&3 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,464 4,431 4,399 4,419 4,472 4,508 4,619 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 704 1 1,569 1,549 1,496 1,460 1 No Relocatables Required ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel and re -purposing in 2004-05 with students served at five other Middle Schools. KJ will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas. Capacity for Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy will be determined when new programs are in place. April 2005 Page 21 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 13,290 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 Kent Mountain View Academy 416 New Permanent Elementary Construction Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 4 500 Subtotal 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 14,206 SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2005-20os 2006-2007 1 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 Actual P R O J E C T E D 13,706 13,754 13,994 14,302 14.470 Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 13,290 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 Kent Mountain View Academy 416 New Permanent Elementary Construction Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 4 500 Subtotal 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 14,206 lRelocatable, Capacity Required 2 0 0 0 48 288 96 264 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,754 13,994 14,302 14.470 I FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 I 13,125 13,222 13,487 13,751 13,989 14,287 14,464 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 581 484 219 3 5 15 6 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 2 12 4 11 I Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades K - 12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @ .5 & excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at .5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. 4 Facility needs are pending review_ Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2005 Page 22 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2005 - 2006 through 2010 - 2011. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school that received funding approval from voters. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This will partially fund building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District anticipates receiving state matching funds and is utilizing impact fees for the senior high school additions. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 23 tc) IrZ Z J f a U_ W U Z CO O Z_ J LL vW CO) X F y Z W Y C: m d w ) U m LL n N U `m } y 0 U C Y 0 0 C. p Ci Ci Ci C U h:�4?' O O O O) O) -' N w -':'m 10 O co CO E0)) ' (o v OD LL '•. 69 69 CN O O p . O O N o p > J OO p .: O O OO NO Cl) 6 pO M O Cl) V N C> O O M (h (O N Cp N cli N w 0 0 C> of rn p O O co M to O m O OCt O O LO UmU .2 N :': O � O (0 INn CN U) E D U) m O O a p y m w O 1 N O):' O O m N CD w 3 C) -. O N O) U 0 0 y U N : OCA co U n O o N O O c y a) w c O O m 00 d y ..3. _. N N N 'D60 c C C O 69 c o w N M C o ( O oc m E o m O n p C Y o p Cl m p d y w O N ::-:':: CO v tp N cl m L N - N CH (0CN 9,N N :V p N f0 (0 LL d -coN E NO < 'D C O) O oD aD 0 O O � C) G) d CN NNO C _ -ppw N CV w � p y M U C N N - 0 2 E O O U CA C w C9 N N Lo O O ` C C p ::: 00 00 c N ::.-.-: °� OD 8 E � U c O N N O C O v) M (A 7 (moo E w m LL LL Z O) m U p ami --.'�- (n O U L M m N w M F- Mw m w v cc LL_D) LLL w f0 U o N j tui _ c = } o W Q co c f0 0 J� Z N '- N F- Z O N _E w m .o O v O :: Z w c O OCD F- c (� - -: O rrir: Q O C O c O S C 2 Y w d O LL -OLa O C LL wU F- O Q LL M H LL O LL ro N N C: m d w ) U m LL n N U `m } y 0 U C Y VIII Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with inflation factor, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elements (#30 -open 2000) $12,182,768 Current cost of Elementary #31 $14,952,532 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2009 $11,200,000 $17,500,000 For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last high school, with inflation factor and projected cost of the next high school: Senior High School Cost Projected Cost Kentlake High School (Opened in 1996) $44,600,000 Current cost for Senior High School #5 adjusted for capacity of - 1000 $42,615,821 Projected cost of High School #5 in 2010 $11,200,000 $52,000,000 Construction cost of the additions to three high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $7,000,000 Addition to Kentrid e $13,600,000 Addition to Kentwood $11,200,000 Construction cost of additions to 3 High Schools $31,800,000 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 25 a / b VIII Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary (Continued) Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment for 2005 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 25 a / b m U O O (ND OND 0) 0) Q y .0 E 0 00 O � 0 o 0 O 0 � o N N U t(f O N m r N E O to � 69 69 H9 et O CO QO t` C m 15a ,m > U N � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . y m ? 000 w U) 61i 6FJ E m E m r O N m to N U a r r r r W 12 M c N c N , (� Y W m 0 60 61), 0 �- O 0 O r N N m w U) cc o N -t 000 N M O U r N 69 69 Ull 00 10 60 6A M 00D O O (ND OND 0) 0) '0 O y .0 E 0 00 O O M 0 O 0 m o N N U t(f O N � r N E c to to 69 69 H9 et 609 CO E t` C m 15a ,m > U N � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . W m ? 000 w U) 61i co E a E m r O N O to N U a r r r r r CD M c N c N , (� Y W m 0 60 61), 0 �- O O d Ln m w U) cc co N O 00 0 O N N N N O cc}QQQ{ cr C C C C 0 J Li Y Y Y � aEi c6 W a W Q NN N co N 0) CO O O O � O O N N .- r N0 to 0 U Of O m O m N � a M (0D NC) N M O O (o 4 (o (n (o I�t M M 6 N C r M 64 69 d N M N r M ((D m _ o coto Cl) criU C a 05 c C Y CO O mr nl U 65O7 C N (D U) co A LU w U) CIA I�r M { Ow O � W m m Cc => L > m L w CD>- ca Vl U c O C E 75 Em O m t � a U U U) Y 2 S? U c m Y . `o o 0 c LC U O Z (q 0 O c c U Ca cc D Z) v n o U W a Y Lo m 0) 0) '0 O y .0 E � to � rn a N W Lo Hm N N C N v O _O E c to 7 0_ m y N O00 et 2 CO E t` C m 15a ,m > U N � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . W m ? 000 w U) 61i co E a E m ((D O O O L (n 't LLI m c (n M c N c N , (� Y W (n 0 60 61), c �- O O j m w N M (0D NC) N M O O (o 4 (o (n (o I�t M M 6 N C r M 64 69 d N M N r M ((D m _ o coto Cl) criU C a 05 c C Y CO O mr nl U 65O7 C N (D U) co A LU w U) CIA I�r M { Ow O � W m m Cc => L > m L w CD>- ca Vl U c O C E 75 Em O m t � a U U U) Y 2 S? U c m Y . `o o 0 c LC U O Z (q 0 O c c U Ca cc D Z) v n o U W a Lo co 0) 0) 0) y a to rn a N u W Lo Hm `0 a o CL c N v f c m 0] M0 7 0_ m y N O00 et 2 00 0 t` C m 15a ,m > U N � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . 7 U m m a m , 0Q w y Y 7 000 � U) 61i co eA O Z 69 ((D M (0D NC) N M O O (o 4 (o (n (o I�t M M 6 N C r M 64 69 d N M N r M ((D m _ o coto Cl) criU C a 05 c C Y CO O mr nl U 65O7 C N (D U) co A LU w U) CIA I�r M { Ow O � W m m Cc => L > m L w CD>- ca Vl U c O C E 75 Em O m t � a U U U) Y 2 S? U c m Y . `o o 0 c LC U O Z (q 0 O c c U Ca cc D Z) v n o U O -,t ti -t 0 O M r (o r O to r ct r M O n N M (o M CA r � U!) 69 6M9 M O Cl) M � (D M M 000 _m NO 7 m W N y 00 o in O I L N 0 N O 2 U) Y U o L (n t (n m (O O cp to N N M N N LO O 7 OOH O t0 N Cl) 0 N h W N 16 0) m atj O O N N a E E m y ) °6 m o S Y_ @ w O N 0 O Y O = Ocu Q L 'O N O U Q @ O ch M CO U) = N O O O U g c C (D Y Y Y (n C L m O) C c a = m m -e D :1 o 5 j 0 to N y� U 1- a0 N 0 - m U Co a M m rn Fo M 9. Lo j 0) 0) 0) a rn a m W `0 a o CL c N N ' o U co c m 0] rn °) O 7 0_ m y 2 (nO o o L)i 0 °a Z5 u E N n O L 0. a, Y Z m U o 7 o U CD Y C m 15a ,m > U m 0 m m E 2 � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . 7 U m m a m , 0Q w y Y 7 d (A U) a a) in M in O Z ((D OND O) (n 't 0 M M 00 m O 0 60 61), 69 E9 O -,t ti -t 0 O M r (o r O to r ct r M O n N M (o M CA r � U!) 69 6M9 M O Cl) M � (D M M 000 _m NO 7 m W N y 00 o in O I L N 0 N O 2 U) Y U o L (n t (n m (O O cp to N N M N N LO O 7 OOH O t0 N Cl) 0 N h W N 16 0) m atj O O N N a E E m y ) °6 m o S Y_ @ w O N 0 O Y O = Ocu Q L 'O N O U Q @ O ch M CO U) = N O O O U g c C (D Y Y Y (n C L m O) C c a = m m -e D :1 o 5 j 0 to N y� U 1- a0 N 0 - m U Co a M m rn Fo M 9. m r j it W T O 0 N N .n Q rz m a lu r U (- co :n m U cc } co v 0 O 0 fn C m Y 0) N 0) 0) 0) W `0 a o CL c a ami N m U ' o U co c m 0] rn °) O 7 0_ m y d > c � (nO o o L)i 0 °a Z5 u E N n O L 0. a, Y Z m U o 7 o U CD Y C m 15a ,m > U m 0 m m E 2 � d y o 0 U o in I N y `m c Y -j o U . 7 U m m a m , 0Q w y Y 7 d (A m in a a) in ro in in O Z m r j it W T O 0 N N .n Q rz m a lu r U (- co :n m U cc } co v 0 O 0 fn C m Y Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS 20,272 Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.482 Elementary 0.293 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.161 Middle School 0.069 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.284 Senior High 0.114 Total 0.927 Total 0.476 Projected Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 500 Elementary 80 Middle School 1,065 Middle School 110 Senior High 1,000 Senior High 120 Special Education 140 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $108,091 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary " $17,500,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $94,200 Senior High * $52,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 See cost basis on Pg. 25 a Senior High @ 31 $94,200 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 71,652 Middle School 27,000 Senior High 20,272 Total 4% 118,924 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 651,273 Senior High 1,007,522 Total 96% 3,134,731 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,547,588 Middle School 678,273 Senior High 1,027,794 Total 3,253,655 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 54.29% Area Cost Allowance - Cost/Sq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $129.81 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $242,558 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $76,682 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.84 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 4 570/ Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0.482 $1,146.20 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.161 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $93,955 1,000 0.284 $853.86 0.161 $0 0.927 0.5429 0.284 $2,401.75 A —> $2,000.06 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence $5,119.22 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (PermanenYTotal Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $17,500,000 500 0.482 0.96 $16,195.20 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.161 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $52,000,000 1,000 0.284 0.96 $14,177.28 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value 0.927 B —> $30,372.48 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence 0 0 FC --> Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Fee Recap Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor I Footage Ratio A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,000.06 C 1 (Elementary) $94,200 24 0.482 0.04 $75.67 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.161 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $94,200 31 0.284 0.04 $34,52 $32,482.73 0.927 C —> $110.19 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I District Match % I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $129.81 80 0.5429 0.482 $2,717.47 D 2 (Middle School) $129.81 110 0 0.161 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 0.5429 0.284 $2,401.75 D ---> $5,119.22 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $242,558 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $1.84 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.57% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC - -> $3,517.04 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC --> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,000.06 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $30,372.48 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $110.19 Subtotal $32,482.73 D = State Match Credit per Residence $5,119.22 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,517.04 Subtotal aZa 'WZ Total Unfunded Need $23,846.47 50% Developer Fee Obligation $11,923 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) -1$7,148) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $4,775 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) /Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor B 1 (Elementary) $17,500,000 500 A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0.293 $696.75 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.069 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $93,955 1,000 0.114 $342.75 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit 0.476 Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) 0.476 Facility Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A—> $1,039.50 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost I Facility Capacity Student Factor I Footage Ratio 24 B 1 (Elementary) $17,500,000 500 0.293 0.96 $9,844.80 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.069 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $52,000,000 1,000 0.114 0.96 $5,690.88 $94,200 0.476 B --> $15,535.68 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $15,535.68 Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) 0.476 Facility Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor Footage Ratio Multi -Family Residence Unit C t (Elementary) $94,200 24 0.293 0.04 $46.00 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.069 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $94,200 31 0.114 0.04 $13.86 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $15,535.68 0.476 C ---> $59.86 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit $16,635.04 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,615.99 Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor $1,111.87 Subtotal Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I District Match % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $129.81 80 0.5429 0.293 $1,651.91 D 2 (Middle School) $129.81 110 0 0.069 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 0.5429 0.114 $964.08 D --> $2,615.99 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $76,682 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $1.84 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.57% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC --> $1,111.87 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC ---> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $1,039.50 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $15,535.68 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59.86 Subtotal $16,635.04 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,615.99 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,111.87 Subtotal - &3727 RF; Total Unfunded Need $12,907.18 50% Developer Fee Obligation $6,454 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($3,514) Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit 1 $2,940 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2004 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2004 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth and moving 9"' grade students to senior highs. This has provided additional capacity for grades 7-8 at middle schools. Kent Junior High is closed for remodeling and re -purposing in 2004-05 and will re -open as Mill Creek Middle School in 2005-06. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections reflect need for future additional capacity at elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The biennial student generation factor survey was previously updated to reflect changes and grade level reconfiguration. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: I ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.482 0.482 Updated for 9t" Grade Single Family (SF) MS 0.161 0.161 Reconfiguration. SH 0.284 0.284 No change required this year. Total 0.927 0.927 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.293 0.293 Updated for 91" Grade Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.069 0.069 Reconfiguration SH 0.114 0.114 No change required this year. Total 0.476 0.476 State Match Credit 53.30% 54.29% Per OSPI (+.99%) Area Cost Allowance (Boeckh Index) $129.81 $129.81 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $234,279 $242,558 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $74,065 $76,682 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.68 $1.84 Per King County Assessment General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.35% 4.57% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,056 $4,775 Change to fee - $719 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $1,762 $2,940 Change to fee - $1178 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 30 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 31 Z w J J 0 w Z W Z D 0 9V W C R W W U W 0 '7 N W t, w 0 M r M O N M 10 N 1- r V N a� M f- O O r r N f0 N M t0 N O 1� O LL) N a O a0 N M v v 1n v a U) v v M 7 1n 1n cc m 10 n a V 1n v a M r O O O O M 10 O O O w p O '7 O O O O pp O M _ M O M O N M M 10 t0 O tD . O 1p � O O N O W 10 O O 10 10 Co m O) O 10 m t0 " M � � aro e4e} W O O N 00 O 1MA M m 't m O p� 1�j � tr0 a0O �M M M 7 Cl) O V V '7 M 1 7 'K V LO to O 7 V K �f V VO U O O O ^ O n N O O O N O N N O 0) t O O N O N O O N O O O O M O M r O O O r N N O r r N O 'R M O O r O r O O r 0 r N r N r N r 7 N r N N N r r r M O V "t N M r O M M N M O O 0 w a0 w O V w 0 O O 0 c0 N 00 (p ap N N 7 a0 O p7 � ap ap yO� 'T rp � V V V VO 7 0 � a V 7 '0V 100 '07 O 10 `Od' � M a � IO iO 7 t? V 100 V Or N Or O N Or O O O r0 O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O N N O Oto M 0 V N M N M 'It N r 0 M M N M M N V N 10 N r N N 0 N N M V M 7 VM 100 't 7 a V V 10 OV It 1N V V t'7 V 100 � a 'OV a 10 'co Nr N N O N N r O O O I� O M O O N O) r O M O r M at r r •- N N r N N N N N N N N r r N r U U UU U O W W 2 Y Oz d d d v=i of umi J E v Um U UcC UF N W22 O c w w m m OV Y YO0U m > d O E m O cN n C m hEU > N m C C N C N C 'C "m 8onmo E OmCY m OD)m W w 0 0 �m 0. am n n UO) a m3 cn Y N � C N c0 CO), j o m M y v rci E W E W m . a v Z' NO m m c O 06 O > C m U N 7 m A W m `m V + C w m Y N J fA C m m m � ccE v N E c 0 � U C A � + v c M N Pn a N r Q+ C FO m N 6 Y m O C O N C') C 5 �i w 4 Y 5 c c Z CO N O O N N m r O m N O` W N O E a 7m O m M 0 N m c m Z o m m CO y N U9 M 'm M 0 � N o 0 CL c0 c m J O N L Q O c o N O V O O N ca O W m m m W m m m w VY w N M CD W CD CL O N Q 0 Z LU CL Q LL 4- 1-. 0 .................. --- ...... C14 6 CD 0. U> Co C, co C, CD !�! z LU ...c C) C) --- CD (D �; a M CD P, N. r. CC) Cj CCOL w 2 C,4 -0 2 0)r- OD Q CV r- CV rco ;j; L Nco 4Y to co 0) CD CO E - w cli (D 3 CA CO C-4 co LLI 4D O uj Z E X 0 W 0 FL 0 CD O Lu C Q) E Lu C> 2) 10 .. rn co f (D X: 0 ER 0 o o a)co V- ... U) a- LL CV (0 D 0 06 04 't N o �; 1- coO C5 It 00 (,o ;: ;1 04 c W .. CO ca N r-- WX co00 Lc) to CJ N06 00 CD 00 C'i CC) t- W w 04 c ui LU -n ca --- 06 4) ci a) U) co B m -, w LU co L) 0 ca C, (D CY) N ... 'T OCY) CV 0 C, C14 C. — -It Lr) C', 0 E ca CD (D -T ...... . .... L) U)V LDa5 Z Lu U) (1) u) c a) (D CD 0 0 0 5CO m eCo E 0 M a iii CD pO r- IT U) 04 'r -0 0 W W :3 LO co CD r� 0 't cli LL co 0 C) D 0 N cl) LO 'IT ca C14 co 'It c) (D 0) U') co �; Q, co m CL CN (D ED to "0 (D U 4D o co� =10 m :-'-' CD 0 0 C') c) cv) c C'4 o r 02 (D Go - 0) Cc? 2 c, CL cq 00 n C-4 04 60 --t co C'i a, 'o ,f5 1 1 z 0 -J W Lo 0) M 0) 0 00 0 m r-- 't 'r 0 m co to CC5 cli C) 6-1 A co co N a COU) m LL 4- 1-. 0 !P, 2 .... ................ E E 3 N C14 6 CD 0. U> Co C, co C, CD !�! 0) r, c) --- CD (D �; a M 0) co 0) 0 40) CL 0 CCOL w 2 CR 0) CIJ C, 00 Z W U) L L) co 0) N cli cli w cli (D 3 CA CO C-4 co LLI 4D O uj Z E X 0 W 0 FL 0 CD O Lu C Q) E 0 to 2) 10 .. rn El- m co it) u) a)co V- ... U) a- F- (0 D ci co 0 _0 0 ?,. O N2 C: 00 (,o ;: ;1 LO C, ca L6 Ln WX .9 L6 C, to CJ N06 00 CD 00 C'i CC) t- W w 04 c ui LU -n ca --- 06 4) U) B m -, w m CL M 00 z m u)NC4 m LO I-- CL w 0 co C', 0 E CD (D -T ...... . .... L) U)V LDa5 Z Lu U) (1) u) c a) (D CD 0 0 0 5CO m M w w CD pO r- IT U) 04 'r C) D 0 N cl) LO 'IT ca C14 co 'It c) (D 0) U') co �; Q, co m CL CN (D ED to "0 (D U 4D 0 C> 4 C') I cv) c C'4 o r 02 Qt Go - 0) Cc? 2 c, CL cq 00 n C-4 04 --t co C'i a, 'o ,f5 1 1 M Z U) W.......... U) W U) U) J- L) 0 cn 0 U) 0 U) ID 0 U) a) U) U) mc: .0 0 c 0 cl) caO Lu (D 0 �e 4) 3 2 2 0 z (1) ........... !P, 2 .... ................ E 04 LOC', 3 N C14 6 CD 0. U> Co C, co C, CD !�! 8 r, c) --- CD (D �; LO (D Clt IL oo N tf) 4) cl) 0) Go V. 2 CR 0) CIJ C, c! 'o CO co U) T) N cli cli w cli (D 3 CA CO C-4 co LLI 4D O uj X 0 W 0 FL CD O Lu C Q) E 0 CO CO 10 r-- U5 c :3 o :E I: LL a)co V- ... jo.6 co F- (0 (6 ci co 0 _0 0 ?,. O N2 C: 00 (,o ;: ;1 LO C, ca L6 Ln 20 .9 L6 C, to CJ N06 00 CD 00 C'i CC) t- W w 04 c ui U) ts ca ti 4) U) B m Z ca OL a) Cl) cn cl, 0) LO (D (3) m 0 co C', CD (D -T ...... . .... L) U)V LDa5 Z Lu U) (1) u) c a) (D CD 0 0 0 5CO m M LO 0) u2 r- m C) D 0 cl) LO 'IT C> 4 C') I cv) c C'4 o r 02 Qt Go - 0) Cc? 2 c, CL cq 00 n C-4 04 (6 C'i a, 'o ,f5 1 1 M LO C> 0 ca 00 C0') E 04 LOC', 3 N C14 6 CD 0. U> Co C, co C) M m C-3 r, c) CD 'It m c) (L) E Clt IL oo 0 00 CO 2 0 CO E U) T) N Cl) C14 w cli (D 3 aD C co LLI 4D O uj U - FL ip0) U) U) M -j OD N r - 0 -1 7. Cl co 3 0 a)co V- LL F- w Lu cm 00 co C 0) a- 4) Ln 20 .9 L6 C, to cc,)) 04 OD 00 CD 00 C'i CC) t- to0) U) c ui U) ts ti 4) U) CO C: a) Y 0) (3) 00 7. U) CD (D >, E ...... . .... L) U)V LDa5 Z Lu U) (1) u) c a) (D CD 0 3: 93 0 CD 0) ........... ........ LO C> 0 ca 00 C0') 04 LOC', 3 N C14 cr U> C) Clt oo 0 00 CO Ci cli 0 N Cl) C14 01 (D 3 aD C co LLI ca U - FL c -j co 0 0 Cl co 3 0 a)co V- LL F- -5 E 0CL 0 cm ca .c O co a- 4) Ln 20 .9 to 0 0 to0) U) c ui U) ts ti -d 0 CO C: a) Y C ca U - a> to 0 0 S C14 CN C� C)O — C:) C) LO CD C) C) C) 0) OD LO LO co00 O cli d) O 0 00 0) — C) C") cli C14 % oo co NLO �2 C) 0) OD LO O)C) r- OD m cL co C) C�. CM04 C) z C11 oc) cli C) O a) co c, c) cli Z". 4) 'a cD GO C� C14 O U) 6 Z o Cl C14 of 65 (D c) Co 0 C) C) co a) r- C\l o) oo cl) cc) 0) 0) P.- (13 (U c LL _0 CD co 0) 0 0 C) C) co rn C) N co C) C, N a z o (D 05 (D C) N6 o C) C14 o z o Ir C3. C) c> C) cD CF) co r- (D ca U— CD 0 (D m C) 0 m C) C3 C14 4 C) cl C14 ci z o -6 Of 4) -0 ca ca 0 Q> :3 E co 0 O U) =3 E c6 cli co cu E 0 2 cc ca 0 E 0 0 u) M co cCL m 0 E 0 2 a) 0 cu (U (.) OO 0 Cl) U) 4-- 0 c 0 0 -C CO 0 F -I 0 a) Q '0 a) cr E 0 C) A? u) u) C) c E -T W 0 0 -o u) 0 .2 c (D U)- n cu cu 0 L) 7a)- 4-- o * (D 'D :3 cc — 0 I — CG 0 IL -2 c U) -0 C=3 co E (D — W C ca U - a> to 0 0 S O U (6 U- C: 2 N C c� C N z1: U) M m M m a C Q T 0 0 Z W a CL a FU a- O IO O (O CD (DM OO OO MM NM Mm Nm M0 0 M O0 tD O M O st w A O M O W m O M O 0 M N M OD co M LS O A M N CD N �7 A M M (n vu') 00 et M CO A N N In M O N r N M st CM CM N N N N N M CM N N CM (M OM M N N N r N N st N N N I.T. M M N N M N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O U U- A't M t st O N A N M m M 00 O A LO r 0 O N 0 w N m w co m m m N M A I -- CD N N R N w M co Cl) N M N r co N Cl) A M 0 LO N M N O w w A m CO O co M I-- 0 O r N r r r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N N C 4) E A M O M O O M CD 0 a0 00 O O (O O lO M V M O O ct A CO M A 0 N UC M " N It M CD 00 O O N CM N NO (O O CO M N O N It N O CD A 00 M (O M CO et Cl) O (D "O N M w W 'at _ st M M�� m CD tO � 7 V M In A O 't tO � M lO A M V� V_ A V V M N A (O S A M m O C> 0 0 C. 0 CD CD CD 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 O O O g 0 O O O O O O C• N _3 M r O M CD O N 0 "-t O O M O W OM O O M O M V O0 A LO M W M CD V A in N L O M A M ", CD M w l0 co N w N O M w O O O N N N O� A A O A O A iO LO N M M A A 00 N O 'It 7 OD 00 00 A A M N (O OD O O W m r n O O M M OR M CO A N N OD N M N C� f- O O O O r r r r O O O O O O r O O r r O O r O O r O r O O O O r r O r C) C ti Vi N M 00 a0 M M N N N M W Cl) co coCO W A V O O O M M M A N N M A 00 00 m 7 r m O r r N CO CM r Cl) N N m co M M N N r CD Cl) A N M A v (O N r A O O DD N M O O O N M� A O r M OD M ct M r r r r M r r N r r r M N et r r tO N M � C O N N CO w O N M m 0) m Cl) CD --t CD N N CD W CD M M N tO N M N O M N M 00 7 M LO M N V' r W r r r M -,t r 0 M CO M A r N M r M CO CO N r r CO r M m ;! A N r O L1J N U) co O m MU') LO (D (D M V M C') O CD co O M( m-�r M m M V WO m N CO CO N M VA N O r r V CD N tt N r tO 00 N r CD W O r N r r 00 N CO m tt N N N CO r r N co r, C,4 cl �Y _ _ O A N A tO M N tO O O m m m O N M m lO N A CD M O Cq N A A 00 N W M V m M N M N '- W M co M A O O O N r O N Cl) M N O A m r" N r r r r r r r r r A N r r d' N r N r r (V N a m N @ w J fn d} U= O U� 0 O w W U) } J} Q' w O w= w ?: J C W W== U� C U E Q E n w -j w w U U U U (n = C9 -� c7 z W a (n = w w U U w vi 0 0 c o (0 m m U) 0 C a 3 w a o m Q cN cu 0C CL Y W m CL co U O m J) m O t O�+ U O F- > 0 to m 0 3 = m 3 y 0) "o 3. 0) Y (D o to m _ M U E aci M M y y C 7 m C O y m N _C m (n m y Cn cm >_ E >�C L) t: a N� M�, m ca 2l (� Y r o - _ oa D m g E U 0 FL U)O U� t X C N CO m C d m N C m �QD O m m CCm C W > LL Itz l 00n N o om .6 m - N;w C m m 3 Cm mm �'^ °� m O O mr� 'O -JmO0Vm mOCmm m R0}M ovn� -7 m m c m � °o� Oof mY c ad m c6 D y - N°3 a 7 N m O m m OV -v m 3 vcO C L .Om . 0m =T mm m oo m o o o m o o m U U WWLLLL LL== ==Y z z a d It of w (n (n U) C0 (n H U) M m M m a C Q T 0 0 Z W a CL a FU Q z W IL a a (Q N co O 0 CD - r 0 N M O 0 1- 10 O o M N r O r o IA r 0 tD O 0 (D r 0 f- (O . 0 (n M N 0 h N r 0 (O - M 0 (D - O 0 N O r 0 M - O 0 O - N 0 '7 p r o � r r C 0- 0 U- C jj O O (p 0) O O O o . O O o M O o n W O O h 'It O o M O O O N O o M M O O ([> O o M o O v O O h (n O O M v O o M I- O M M p O tD G (Q C UI C N _ W N Ci O N M O co N o O M O (D O O 1� r O M M o co N O N O (D N O O 1l O co h N o M N O N O O M O 00 r O M N (n O w M et O Oi N a3+ co 0 1.- V o O M O tF O N O M O IA O M q O O Uy O O r � O I� O er o `V' O M O M o (D O of c r r N M N v co N LO () M M M 't N In M O 00 O M U) C r 0D I� M M M c0 t0 r O M p M t0 N O co CO r N w h (D tD N O to Mp (n M M co (D O co (D N M N co Cl) co (- N I� n O 7 N T Q) CD tD � r co co 7 (Mn (MA � (+Mj CD v p0 . M-- (pD � N r F N _ O r t0 N M M _ O N M N M M � p N Z N E w ca Q w w a LL U- z w w J = W a 0 o o 2 0 C O Qi > Qi Q C C cu LL 1 ~= c Y Z N O E CL Q Yp g v N d L F v o m � N W C Z, 0 w C E E Q O a 0 LL co O c O U 0 LL N U M C 0 0 rn N o In m E co N N w N .2 sN.. C E E Q y (� c -D .0 � 1c al d 2 co E r m Q m (op a v J o U Y v C WEO C Q N U `m > > ¢ ap OD (° N N N n N cc •a a`> > o U c o m m w 'C c rn L CL c O L a S c m O d > .0 m O !- E 0 M to v 0 v CD co m � m M 0 0 � NM Ft Q z W IL a a P/T#3 Incorporate Dieringer School District Updated 2005-2011 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors, August 29, 2005.) U RECEIVED SEP 0 12005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2005m2011 Board Approved August 29, 2005 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320-17801 Avenue East -Sumner, Washington 98390 (253) 862-2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jim Barfoot Pete George Corey Pawlak Larry Thompson Mary Say Wasserstrom Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent lile'rin ger Educating every child. for Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow Dieringer School District No. 343 Dieringer School District An Overview Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School, provide K through 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northern two-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment is approximately 1,220 students in grades kindergarten . through eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Lake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade; Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998, North Tapps Middle School houses students in grades sixth -eighth. The district suppoits an additional 531 high school students who 'nay select to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend Auburn Riverside and'Sumner High School. The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed.of students who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. parents are concerned with student success and provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School District. The PTA and many volunteers contribute countless hours and resources to our schools and students. The community supports the. schools through the passage of funding issues to support bus acquisition, student access to current technology and the construction of school facilities Capital Facilities Plan Update: 2005 ATTACHMENT #2 For the purposes of the 2005 amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan., we would like each'school district to use the format as outlined in the tables below: Table IX PS 1 Complete -this table as in Pierce County's 2004. Capital Facilities Plan, listing each elementary, each intermediate/middle/junior high, and each high school (see attachment.#1). Table IX -PS -1. Current Facilities Inventory Public Schools The inventory of current Public School capital facilities includes the followin . Capacity . Name (Number of Students) Location Dieringer School District Lake Tapps Elementary 396 1320-178 Ave. E., Sumner Dieringer Heights Elementary 431 21727-30 St. E., Sumner North Tapps Middle School 405 20029-1P St. E., Sumner . High School 0 TOTAL 1232 Dieringer School District 2006 Capital Facilities Plan Table IX P S.2. You do not need to provide any information regarding this table from attachment #1. a ----- — Sj 991 29. in - i Qro 8enter. Readown . i - o � [C- z �•. • Colf Luke'. ( $�t�, r8 N a � 0 - •°� 3 Itv Bbl z~ �M • � - .w WU) .� Em __:___Lake Tapps Elementary_..__ Construction.2004-05 1 � . Dieringer"Heights J o �- 0V luD J D -j DO �0 a -L ELfz 3:z 0w z fl Enrollment Projections The Dieringer School District is located in anarea that continues to experience growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data, proposed housing development, the increase in the assessed valuation of the real property and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District experienced a period of slow, steady growth in student enrollment with a ten year average of 1.74% between October 1994 and 2003. This mirrored the Pierce County 2.03% and Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD)1.79% enrollment growth over the same period. Beginning with November 2003, the District saw a notable increase in student enrollment resulting in a 4.5% increase from September 2003 to September 2004. Currently, Dieringer is the most rapidly growing district in Pierce County (+4.33% October to October / 1.95% ten year average) and substantially exceeds the Pierce County (-0.62% October to October) and the PSESD (+.016% October to October). A review of proposed construction within the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to continue over the next four years and . beyond. There are 842 single family residents slated for construction within- the next four years. The two multi -family projects, transferred from Pierce County to the City of Auburn, will contribute an additional 485 * residential units during 2005-2006. These projects are anticipated to generate an additional 460 students in .kindergarten through eighth grade. In .addition, '161 students will be added to enrollment from normal growth from individual houses and in -migration by September, 2011. Information from Pierce County Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,200 more lots in the western portion of the district that are not included in the above numbers. To address this growth the District is currently developing plans to construct an additional -five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary and an auxiliary.gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North Tapps Middle School by fall of 2006. Future anticipated growth will create the need to acquire an additional school site and construct an additional school to house the growing student enrollment. Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase Proposed Housing Units for Approved Developments: Single Family- 842 x .48 generation factor = 404 students K-8 grade Multi -family — 485 x .1149 generation factor = 56 students K-8 grade (Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Generation Factor) Proposed Housing Units from Individual Lots and In -migration: 161 students K-8 grade Enrollment Impact: 621 students K-8 Estimated 103 students a year over the period 2006-2011 Potential enrollment increase = 51.84% (based on 1,198 enrollment 5-05) Increase per grade level = 69 students Approximately 207 students per school HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS August 2005 #1 Fairweather Cove Estates (25) - Notice of application 1/24/01 - 25 Single Family Lots -1600-2000 block of 16a' St. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy. - Develop phase started 3/05 - Contact:- Carl Halsan (253) 307-1922 - 25 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding. #2 Rainier Plateau (10) - - Notice of application 10/13/00 =10 Single. Family Lots - End of 30 St. - Plat Approval resubmitted to Pierce County - Possibly 2005 (waiting for county road permit) - Contact — Walter Bishop (253) 537-3705 -10 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #3 Quiet Water (86) - Notice of Application 12/30/94. Re-application 3/19/99 -156 Single Family Lots sold - Along 214a' East of Tapps Island - 90 homes under construction 5/05 (70.occupied 9-05) - Contact Pacific Resource Development (253) 848-5541 -86 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #4 Grandview Ridge H and III (12) - Off Sumner-Tapps Hwy. across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr. - Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13/99 50 Single Family Lots; 38 completed 5105 - Substantial completion by fall 2005-11; III (9 lots) start fall 2005) - Contact Mr. Westmark (253) 606-4685 712 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #5 North Tapps Estates (193) -north of Lake Tapps Elementary -Preliminary Plat 7/23/02 -193 Single Family Lots Development phase started 3105 -Contact Matthew Sweeney (253) 565-1728 -193 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #6 White River View Tracks (0) -Edwards Road (overlooking the White River Valley) -27 Single Family Lots Completed 5105 - Contact Summit Reality, Lenny (253) 405-5292 - Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #7 Forest Canyon Highlands (251) -Notice of application 8/27/04 -251 single family Lots -South of road terminus from Lakeland Hills Hwy. -Contact Terry Barghausen (425) 251-6222 -Construction 2006-2008; full Completion winter 2008 -251 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #8 Tapps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (11) -Notice of application 9/13/04 -11 large lots -across from Snag Island -Contact John Hill (253) 798-3185 -11 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #9 Terrace View Park (430) Environmental Impact Statement with Addendum 9/28/99 -430 Multi -Family Units (apartments: 1, 2 and 3 bedroom) -Off East Valley Hwy., at base of new Lake Tapps Parkway. - Contact Jeff Dixon, Auburn Planning Dept., (253) 931-3000 #10 Country Creek Estates k9) -9 Single Family Lots -off 15 near Edwards Road -Construction 2/05 with first homes fall 2005 -Contact Robert Stewart, Developer, (253) 833-0857 -9 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding (see file notes) #11 Forest Canyon Estates (124) -124 Single Family Lots —off Forest Canyon Rd. .Site Development spring 2006 with site completion by 2008 Contact Larry Onorati, Agent (425) 251-6222 -124 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding #12 Forest Canyon Heights (21) -21 Single Family Lots —off Forest Canyon Rd. -Construction April 2005 with first home by January 2006 -Contact Rick Gienger (253) 531-0412 office; (253) 380-0996 cell -21 Mitigation Impact Fees outstanding 742 Single Family Units to be built 430 Multi -family Units to be built #13 Auburn Annexation (155) -100 Single Family Lots -55 townhouses 8/05 Standard of Service The Dieringer School District houses children in elementary" schools serving students kindergarten through fifth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. ITigh school students, grades nine. through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Auburn School District. Dieringer School District follows `a traditional school calendar beginning in early September and completing in mid Tune. The daily school schedules.begin between 7:49 -and 8:45 a.m. and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. The Dieringer School District standard of service is based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Due to the passage of Initiative 728 and in keeping with the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom kindergarten through third grade is 22 fourth through fifth grade 25 and sixth through eighth grade 27. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes. In the District, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not c6unted as capacity classrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instruction, physical education and art instruction in separate, non -capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non -capacity spaces. Special education and remedial programs are provided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. ' At the middle school level, instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 516 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. Table IX -PS -2A: Complete this table by indicating the level of service in square feet per student, which has been established at each level (elementary, intermediatelmiddlerjunior high, high school) for your school district. Table 1X-PS.2A. School District Service Standards Public School Facilities (Sqare Feet pper Student) Elementary Middle Junior High Senior High District Name Schools Schools Schools Schools ieringer' 120 189 NA NA ATTAC I ENT IX -PS -2-1 Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2004 Capital Facilities Plan. List proposed individual capacity projects for 2006 -2011. ATTACHMENT IX -PS -2-1 Public- School Facilities INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY PROJECTS Name Capacity Dieringer Heights Elementary 116 5 classroom addition Elementary No. 3 400 North Tapps Middle School 162 science lab, auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom addition Senior High NA Table IX -PS -3. Please provide the information for one time period, 2006-2011. Table 1X -PS -3. CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds (x $1,000) Public School Facilities Sources/Uses 2006-2011 Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Bond Proceeds, Reserve 0 New Revenue: Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments$28,323 Total Sources $28,323 Uses of Funds Dieringer Heights Elementary 5 classroom addition ( $2,196) Elementary School No. 3 North Tapps Middle School ($17,440) science lab, auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom ($6,525) addition Non -Capacity Projects: ($2,162) transportation additions and technology upgrades Subtotal ($28,323) Total Costs ($28,323) Balance 0 Surplus or (Deficit) 0 O O O co r- C - co N O O a ❑. a) E W h C O U U U LL O ,� Oh Occ a) O O i OTO O O Cl) m 06 � a) +� m E O O O O O U N C m _ m Q E 'a CO O O d- tq c C .. V U LL 4-. as ca g N O O O co r- C - O CL C: m c ca E L ^a) I - O E- m o o O O O U U LL U) m Oh O O O O OTO O Z O +� m E O O O O O O O p �. N m Q E 'a CO O O d- aD co d .. V U U C it O N r L cq Ln Z Q D W m N Z L LL W N O CL C: m c ca E L ^a) I - O O O O 1- 0) T T MISMEW-- O O O O c0 M T LO N N O O O O O m Oh O O O OTO O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O 1- 0) T T MISMEW-- O O O O c0 M T LO N N O O O O m O O OrO OTO O C13 ol CD O Lo r �C () It N (p N L W N rTO NN 'd- N N C O t!1 U O U Q U +' co '0 = N Z U +N+ (L _N W Q )"-' N ' aU U rn ca i i o Ec� n _m a) ca ca � 4'a U L ca Q. r- 0 ccc U CL CL U C c Z J •� E ca CLQ .c F- ❑ W Z F- Z F- F- F- F- Table IX -PS -5. The "total Cost" in the following table shows the total cost of capacity projects needed to meet the level of service standards for school facilities. To calculate "Total Cost," you can use the following formula: Total Cost Net Deficiency (from "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column) . x School District Cost per Student (from Table IX PS -5A.) . Because "School District Cost Per Student" (from Table IX PS -5A.) differs among the elementary, intermediate/middle/junior high, and high schools, separate calculations need to be made for each, and then added together to obtain the "Total Cost" figure. If the "Net Reserve or Deficiency" column shows a new reserve, the "Total Cost" column will be zero. Table IX -PS -5. Capital Facility Requirements, to 2011 Public School Facilities (See Table IX -PS -5A for individual rates at each level.) Tune Period Student Student Net Reserve Population/ Capacity Total Cost or (Cost/Student Student Demand (Deficiency) a Net Deficiency) 2005 Actual 1,219 1,232 13 2006-2011 Growth 621 678 57 Non -Capacity Costs Total Cost as of 2011 U) H W OW J n. 5 0 LO _ W o Q V N a cn *.r a�N V W ZN4LU4 z LU CL - co. cu cr) U o cti as T CD U CD C: .— rn U� U cr) co d � c CD E °' m E m m W 0 Q. cu z Q- Hir YW F— ca -� -- m M CD O d- T O co O T O T d- T M .ter m m Z W Q o 00 E o 0) O U N Cl) co 0) W E A = (U 0-0 W c n co C� a (D F� Q c Ca LCf) •L -X zz�a co co o T CD O co d N T c n co C� a (D F� Q c Ca LCf) •L -X zz�a Table IX -PS -5A. Complete this table as in Pierce County's 2004 Capital Facilities Plan.'If possible, use 2004 dollars. If you are using dollars from a different year, indicate the year. Table IX -PS -5A. School District Cost Per Student Public School Facilities (2004 Dollars) District Name Elementary Middle Junior High Schools Schools Schools . Dieringer $22,745 $32,238 NA Senior High Schools NA School Impact Fee Calculation IDISTRICT { > �n... OMAN School Site Acquisition Cost: ((AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capaci )xStudent Generation Factor Student Student Facility Cost/ Facili Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capac SFR Elementary �{ y 'l ; " ` Middle MFR SFR "<� $ 965 TOTAL $965 MFR 5206 $206 School Construction Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor)x(permanent/Total Ft) w 4>fis •:. Cost Capacl . $17,440,000 400 { < : Student Student Factor Factor SFR MFR 0.322 0.069 0.322 0.069 0,158 0.046 TOTAL I Cost/ SFR $14,039 $6,088 $6,380 $26,507 Cost/ MFR $3,008 $1,301 $1,861 $6,170 Elementary No.3 Elementa -DHES:.>"�` Middle Sch. Additi. Temporary Facility Cost: ' f acility Cost/Facility Ca ac xStudent Generation Factor)x(Tem orary/Total Square Feet) Student IStudent I Cost/ Cost/ %Tem / Facili Facility Factor Factor SFR MFR Total Sq.F Elementary Middle SJ" Cost Size . -'31€ t .Ji: Y.nfi kt ^SiA•-4. gla3..?:Y:. SFR MFR 0.322 0.069 0.158 0.046 TOTAL $0 $0 State Matching Credit: Boeckh Index X SPI Square Foota e X District Match % X Student Factor Student Student Boeckh SPI I District lFactor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Index JJ::�3•-y-�tJ. Elementa ''*>" Middle Footage Match % -h$> ` , v:-'.;�>`viy:.�2<?ktiazs:ffd, SFR MFR TOTAL SFR $Q MFR $Q Tax Payment CredIt:1 Average Assessed Value (est.) Capital Bond Interest Rate Net Present Value of Avera a Dwelling Years Amortized Levy Property Tax Le Rate (2004) SFR MFR J:E :<sFt'�`.3�.i :;:TJ;�•:ii. ,X:W�t>, 1. $2,318,494 $1,730,441 J i.JVV r` � z,. f < Present Value of Revenue Stream $6,561 $4,897 Fee Sumary: Single Multiple Famil Famil Site Ac uisiion Costs $965.00 $206.00 Permanent Facility Cost 526,507.42 $6,169.80 Temporary Facility Cost $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit $0.00$0.00 Tax Payment Credit ($6,561.34) ($4,897.15) FEE $20,911 $1,479 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% $10,456 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% 5739 P/T#4 Incorporate Federal Way School District Updated Capital Facilities Plan (2006) as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. (Adopted by the Federal Way School District Board of Directors, May 24, 2005.) Preston IGates IEllis LLP July 1, 2005 Denise L. Stiffarm denises@prestongates.com David Osaki RECEIVE® City of Auburn Planning & Community Development JUL25 West Main Street 6 2005 Auburn, WA 98001-4916 NANh'iNO DEPARTMENT Re: Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Dear Mr. Osaki: As you know, the Federal Way School District's service area includes portions of the City of Auburn. As you also know, the City is currently considering approval of Jovita Heights, a 107 lot preliminary plat that is located entirely within the District's service area. The students generated from this development will have significant impacts on the District's school facilities. In addition, we understand that there is a possibility of additional residential development in portions of the City that are located within the District's service area. Given these facts, the Federal Way School District respectfully requests that the City of Auburn adopt the District's Capital Facilities Plan as a sub -element of the City's Comprehensive Plan during the current annual update. Enclosed please find a copy of the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. The District's Board of Director's adopted this Plan on May 24, 2005. The District would also like to initiate discussions with the City regarding the inclusion of the District within the City's existing school impact fee ordinance and the development of a corresponding interlocal agreement. Please contact me at (206) 370-7645 to discuss these matters. Sincerely, PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP v By Denise L. Stiffarm - Encl. cc: Ms. Salty McLean, Federal Way School District (w/o encl.) K:192820%00001%DLS\DLS L20LA A LAW FIRM i A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES P/70 925 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 2900 SEATTLE, WA 98104-1158 TEL: 1206! 623-7580 FAX: 12061 623-7022 www.prestongates.com Anchorage Coeur d'Alene Hong Kong Orange County Portland San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC Federal Way Public Schools 2006 Capital Facilities Plan Buildingfor the Future FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar Charles Hoff Thomas Madden Bob Millen SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy F FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities Needs Forecast - New Facilities Six Year Finance Plan SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction Map - Elementary Boundaries Map - Middle school Boundaries Map - Senior High Boundaries SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities Portable Locations Student Forecast Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fee Calculations SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 PLAN ii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 14-15 16-18 19-23 24-26 27-30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2005 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2005. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This pian is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This bond provided for Todd Beamer High School ($44 million); Sequoyah Middle School ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Other planned and completed improvements included in the bond proposal were: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily for students in the 6`h and 7`h grade. Eighth grade teachers will see 90 students each day. This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a calmer campus. The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2006 and 2011. This does not diminish the need to open Sequoyah Middle School in the 2005/06 school year. With the opening of Sequoyah Middle School the average enrollment at all middle schools will be between 700 and 800 students. Another initiative that will impact capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highline Community College is offering this program to I I'f' and 12' grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows promising 1 la` and 12`h grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre -Kindergarten students. A new Headstart facility on the Harty Truman High School campus opened in January 2005. This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Headstart was housed at three of the elementary schools in the Federal Way District. Currently the only decentralized program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Forest Elementary. The District intends to expand the ECEAP Pre - Kindergarten program. The District is considering offering a Kindergarten through 8`h grade instructional configuration. This program could be offered at an existing site, with appropriate facility changes. Other options for opening this program are new construction or purchase and remodel of an existing building. As the projects from the 1999 bond are finalized, the District is presenting a 20 -year plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. If approved the $245 million bond to be run in 2006 would replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Federal Way High School would be replaced and capacity increased by approximately 800 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout. The cost to rebuild is $81 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33%. Part of this cost is included in the Capital Facilities Plan impact fee calculation. The non -instructional projects included in the 20- year plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location The proposed bond package includes shared instructional and community facilities. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Federal Way Celebration Park sports fields and future Community Center. A performance auditorium is planned for a corner of the Federal Way High School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An environmental instruction and retreat center is proposed for property adjoining Sequoyah Middle School. iv W FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide Brigadoon Camelot Enterprise Green Gables Lake Dolloff Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain Meredith Hill Mirror Lake Nautilus Olympic View Panther Lake Rainier View Sherwood Forest Silver Lake Star Lake Sunnycrest Twin Lakes Valhalla Wildwood Woodmont MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy Illahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Saghalie Sequoyah Totem SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur Federal Way Thomas Jefferson Todd Beamer Harry S Truman ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 1635 SW 304th Street 3601 SW 336th Street 4041 S 298th Street 35101 5th Avenue SW 32607 47th Avenue SW 4200 S 308th Street 303 SW 308th Street 35675 32nd Avenue S 2450 S Star Lake Road 5830 S 300th Street 625 S 314th Street 1000 S 289th Street 2626 SW 327th Street 344241 st Avenue S 3015 S 368th Street 3460012th Avenue SW 1310 SW 325th Place 4014 S 270th Street 24629 42nd Avenue S 4400 SW 320th Street 27847 42nd Avenue S 2405 S 300th Street 26454 16th Avenue S. 34620 9`" Avenue S 360011 st Avenue S 4400 S 308th Street 1415 SW 314th Street 1101 S Dash Point Road 33914 19th Avenue SW 3450 S 36& ST 26630 40"' Ave S 2800 SW 320th Street 30611 16th Avenue S 4248 S 288th Street 35999 16th Ave S 31455 28th Ave S 36001 1" Ave S Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Kent Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Des Moines Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Kent 98023 98023 98001 98023 98023 98001 98023 98001 98003 98001 98003 98003 98023 98003 98003 98023 98023 98032 98032 98023 98001 98003 98198 98003 98003 98001 98023 98003 98023 98001 98032 Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 98003 Auburn 98001 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1 st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Propertv Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 ECEAP Offices 3081914'h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # I Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320'' and east of 45' PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1" Way S and S 342°d St — Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360'' St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308'' St and 10 Ave S — .36 Acres 81 S 332°d St and 9'' Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non -instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the 20 -year plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students include expansion at the Decatur High School site. These plans supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Sequoyah Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of funds are current bond issues and state match. C w 3 3 u q rJ 3 T .y �q k0 y .S f� w� o ani ° u � o o o tV0 b � V O R 3 K N [" .q°0 0 g u —1 h u F 0 0 y F a° v a o0 3 oa 7R ° U ..�.. "S U •q % G 79 0 O p 0 V � 69 0 vii p td > v �a O p, 'd b U 0 N .0 00 V G h O u Yy h O yyu ° p O u oG R ,o o R o 9 2,oVu R u� o rim q vi 6r.00, cn ,n noo -n+ t00v Ny o O 5 O -5 O O C o v r oo O N pO C) S 4 C N b 61) a� a� a V1 ^. N til � � h Aq �p t� 00 ►a d' CI a � `4 .dcgv� v v�..a�aF � o c cn rA a M0 W C w 3 3 u q rJ 3 T .y �q k0 y .S f� w� o ani ° u � o o o tV0 b � V O R 3 K N [" .q°0 0 g u —1 h u F 0 0 y F a° v a o0 3 oa 7R ° U ..�.. "S U •q % G 79 0 O p 0 V � 69 0 vii p td > v �a O p, 'd b U 0 N .0 00 V G h O u Yy h O yyu ° p O u oG R ,o o R o 9 2,oVu R u� o rim q vi 6r.00, cn 3�t w� W a� a� a � w � cl v CI a C w 3 3 u q rJ 3 T .y �q k0 y .S f� w� o ani ° u � o o o tV0 b � V O R 3 K N [" .q°0 0 g u —1 h u F 0 0 y F a° v a o0 3 oa 7R ° U ..�.. "S U •q % G 79 0 O p 0 V � 69 0 vii p td > v �a O p, 'd b U 0 N .0 00 V G h O u Yy h O yyu ° p O u oG R ,o o R o 9 2,oVu R u� o rim q vi 6r.00, cn FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2005/06 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In January 2005 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2005/06 school year. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts. are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a. complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools oE="`S------- ---- ". Every Student, a Reader ------�'' -r x - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2 Code — ■ Code — .41k.c` I Adelaide C-6 30 Mathes, E_9 - __ _; _ `-• 2 �Llarloon D-8 31 Kilo 19 3 Camelot G-6 32 L.akotap.5 Z ! r•!'~: 2 4 Green eD-9 33 Sacajawea E-6 b CareGables A-7 34 SaphaNe C,8 •�++. -- ,,, - �,�, `'F 6 lake L1oNoft G-6 35 Totem �3 52 s 7 Lake Grow D-6 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-8 s, i a rri 9 Lakeland E-9 M 9 Mark Twain F-4 - 10 Mereditha H -s t1 Mirror Lake SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS E-6 12 Nautilus E_5 .• 4s . _ '; 13 Olympic view C-7 Com — ■ 3 _ ? - 3 14 Panther Lake F 9 40 Decatur C-8 1S Rainier View •'• „1p .. 16 Sherwood Forest D4 41 Federal Way E-5 f> • • , sF'`L"' ? 17 Silver Lake 42 Thomas Jefferson _ D-7 c-4 : • � 3s 18 Star Lake45 Todd Beamer 18 19 Sunnycrest G-2 49 Harry S. Truman F-6 `M 20 Twin Lakes B-6 "' u�"r'�" - °j S 27r3iy 21 Valhalla G.4 22 Wildwood F-SFuture School _ 3 2 23 Woodmord F-3 Surplus Sites Srtas — r ' 4 �.. 81 Educational Service Center F-6 — , f= 85 Mairdenance-Operations-Transportation E-6 — Code Parks N D °• • s A B C ttS FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VICINITY F i\ si 1 i Se7� ' .Z1�`lp7 �qp `L1�gn• Sa�F� E' LJQ" 74, LW P lag I J VS 1 MA RK k1r:; 5A X Nay rWE ttF[F[�� tt N 16 AN k Federal Way Public Schools Every Student, a Reader ���ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS I Adelaide C-6 30 Illahee E-9 2 Brilladoon 8-8 31 Kilo 3 Camelot G-5 G-6 Enterprise D-6 4 D-9 33 Sa"Jawea E-5 32 Lakota Green Gables A-7 34 Saghafl* as Lake D=ff C-3 mali G-6 36 Totem G-3 7 Lake Grove 0-6 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-8 8 Lakeland E-9 9 Mark Twain F4 0 Meredith Hill H4 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Mirror Lak V 11 E-6 U%J Ad 5W.. 12 Nautilus E-6 id 13 Olympic View C-7 code — 14 Pandw Lake E-8 Mr &I ;f 1: Rainier View F-10 40 Decatur C-6 k 711T I V. I Sherwood Forest D-8 41 Federal Way E-6 17 Silver Lake D-7 42 Thomas Jeffers. G-4 18 Star Lake G-3 45 Todd Beam&r E-9 Is 49 Harry S. Truman Sunnycrest G-2 F-6 20 Twin Lakes -6 B 21 Valhalla G-4 22 Wildwood F-5 Future School Site$ 23 Woodmont F-3 Surplus Sites LAI aim 81 Educational Service Center F-6 — 86 11114141ftnencO-0139rall0m4ransportation E-6 — Code 0, L tj Parks V -ITO XL .1 9 a wt TWT ,e& INN F i3 W r: iiJe, led V. gi ro as F jP ;q Wk IA 15 4 IF, Erm, jr lip 51 1 N ar , 8 W ® E _.�.� , o I FF! S r wsrar.w as♦ �'t t Nrs...>r. 'x x s os wm lAK{to1 1 =i 175 a • cg6jr" s. t>� D c Federal Way Public Schools '° Every Student, a Reader 9 2M ........ 11 MrITON F K„g1 Pr. I F 3 HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES s • Federal Way Public Schools -- E oE=x _,--__'-' F`" x •� Every Student, a Reade owo 1 9 r ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS ,6ry4 Code — . code — ■ .x 1 Adelaide C-6 30 11101160 E -g E-9- - I 2 Brigadoon B-8 31 Kilo G-6 a' 3 Camelot G-5 32 Lakota 2 - ! 4 Enterprise D-9 33 Sw4awea E -5y 5 Green Gables A-7 34 Saghalie C-8 6 Lake DONOR G-6 35 Totem G-3 n.nN " : 7 Lake Grove D-8 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-8 6 Lakeland E-9 >� � ' •+., : : :ate 9 Mark Twain F4 - a res Hill E--5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 11 Mirror ke 12 Nautilus E-6 Code— 3 13 Olympic View C-7 . - - 14 Panther Lake E-8 15 Rainier view w F-10 Decatur C-6 •", 16Sherwood Forest D.8 41 Federal Way Ed 17 Silver Lake D-7 42 Thomas Jefferson C,..4 18 Star Lake G3 45 Todd Beamer E_9 19 Sunnycrest G-2 49 Harry S. Truman F4 .-�• - 20 Twin Lakes B4 $27 si 21 Valhalla G-4 r 22 WNdwood F-5 23 Wootlmord Future School Sites — (= a F-3 Surplus Sites - - .. 4 81 Educational Service Center F-6 — 85 Maimemnce-Operations-Transporladon E-6 — Code _ ■ + _>" �f• T s - £� Parks — f P.v A g C .t i FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and` - c 41 N ar , 8 W ® E _.�.� , o I FF! S r wsrar.w as♦ �'t t Nrs...>r. 'x x s os wm lAK{to1 1 =i 175 a • cg6jr" s. t>� D c Federal Way Public Schools '° Every Student, a Reader 9 2M ........ 11 MrITON F K„g1 Pr. I F 3 s x f >•I 9 r _ ' Y 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2006 through 2012 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. For grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the target class size is 26 students. In the 2004/05 school year, all of the 23 elementary schools offer at least one all day Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 456 436 Bri adoon 510 490 Camelot 347 327 Enterprise 404 384 Green Gables 432 412 Lake Dolloff 490 470 Lake Grove 424 404 Lakeland 450 430 Mark Twain 4Ci5 444 Meredith Hill 437 417 Mirror Lake 379 359 Nautilus 475 455 Olympic View 424 404 Panther Lake 437 417 Rainier View 445 425 Sherwood Forest 494 474 ilver Lake 502 482 tar Lake [Twin 474 454 unn crest 424 404 Lakes 450 430 Valhalla 477 457 Wildwood 445 425 Woodmont 375 355 2006 TOTAL 10,216 9,755 lElementary Average Notes * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. * Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 13 MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE hee fKilo 799 807 Federal Way1,456 799 807 ota 750 758 Saca'awea 774 782 Sa halie 694 701 Sequoyah 700 707 Totem 735 742 Federal Way Public Academy 212 214 2006 TOTAL 5,463 5518 Schoolverage SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Decatur 1,269 1343 Federal Way1,456 1541 Thomas Jefferson 1,435 1519 Todd Beamer 1,523 1612 Truman High School 200 200 Federal WayPublic Academy133 133 2006 TOTAL 6,016 6,348 I*Senior High Average 1 1,421 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Merit School 16 16 12006 TOTAL 16 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT 1 TDC 3 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 Total 1 NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSMUMONAL Decatur 5 Federal Wa 1 Thomas Jefferson 3 TOTAL 9 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT 1 TDC 3 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 Total 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master" software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC 5CHnni N 2(" VA PITA t _ Fs rri rriEPo ni A ,., assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23,00( 22,00( 21,00( c 20,OOa v V = 19,000 `ro 18,000 O 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% m a a 0.0% v c -0.5% 1.5% 'ooNooaoaS o i9 ooo oo o A'oooa��oo oibo oo b bbo , , bo jo j a School Year FTE - 6 Percent of Change 0 18 Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount =.5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount; Senior High FTE _ .945Headcount) Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High Total K -12 FTE Perce Chan, 2000 1999-00 11,641 5,156 4,380 21,176 2001 2002 2000-01 11,640 5,305 4,338 21,283 0.5% 2001-02 11,498 5,337 4,467 21,302 0.1% 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 -1.0% 2004` 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 0.4% 2006 B2005-06 91119 5,410 6,629 21,158 0.0% 2007 P2006-07 9,203 5,282 6,744 21,229 0.3% 2008 P2007-08 9,444 5,206 6,844 21,494 1.2% 2009 P2008-09 9,631 5,217 6,828 21,676 0.8% 2010 P2009-10 9,765 5,283 6,813 21,861 0.8% 2011 P201011 9,912 5,393 6,695 21,999 0.6% 2012 P201142 10,021 5,500 6,681 22,202 0.9% * New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 Ngh School 9-12 23,00( 22,00( 21,00( c 20,OOa v V = 19,000 `ro 18,000 O 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% m a a 0.0% v c -0.5% 1.5% 'ooNooaoaS o i9 ooo oo o A'oooa��oo oibo oo b bbo , , bo jo j a School Year FTE - 6 Percent of Change 0 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes Sequoyah Middle School Increase Capacity at Federal Way High Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,158 rrojectea - - 'alendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 school Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007108 2008/09 2009/10 20-10/21 2011/12 21,011 21,011 20,985 20,959 20,933 20.933 20913 Basic FTE Enrollment 21,158 21,229 21,494 21,676 21,861 21,999 22,202 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) k 288 288 288 288 288 288 288 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,325 2,525 2,7-25 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity ................... Add New Portable Capacity .......... ........................... .......... .......... ............ Deduct Portable Capacitv - -------- --- - -- ................ ............. SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ---a-- - - ulujcctcu - - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNTCAPACITY 10,216 10,190 10,164 10,138 10,112 10 112 10,112 1. Special Education Changes Headcount Capacity _ 10,190 10,164 10,138 10,112 10,112 1 10,112 10,112 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,199 9,203 9,444 9,765 9,912 10,021 2 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 32 32 32 %631 2 32 32 32 n_ :. - RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE NOTFC_ a: 1. Add Special Education and ECEAP Programs This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity f SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE NOTES: 1. Sequoyah Middle School to Open 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 22 - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 4,763 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 1. Se uo ah Middle School q y o01- Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,410 5,282 5,206 5,217 5,283 5,393 5,-- 2. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 9292 1 1 92 92 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity f SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE NOTES: 1. Sequoyah Middle School to Open 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1. Internet Academv (A A 6,629 1 66,744 164 - 6164 61648 6,813 1 164 61645 61641 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 3. Add new portable capacity 225 1 425 1 625 1 625 1 625 1 625 1 625 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year CAPACITY School Year BUILDING PROGRAM 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 HEADCOUNT CAPACITY6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 }..., Add or subtract changes in capacity lid- Increase Capacity at Federal Way High School =.... Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,832 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1. Internet Academv (A A 6,629 1 66,744 164 - 6164 61648 6,813 1 164 61645 61641 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 3. Add new portable capacity 225 1 425 1 625 1 625 1 625 1 625 1 625 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE }..., lid- NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3. Add Portable Capacity 4. Capacity for unboused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. This would provide program for additional high school students. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units which were constructed in the last five (5) years. The multi -family yield is derived from an average of other King County school districts. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is a negotiated purchase price. Single Family Units Multi -Family Units Plan Year 2006 Plan Year 2005 Collection Year 2006 Collection Year 2005 w $3393. $ 895. $2868 $ 905. I m 0 * o o t2 LL o 0 'C `O CO O �o.- N LL O O Vj OC �0n Cif • 7 O O C icy IL 6 c 32m Sc prowM O 3 V OLL O O M w t 0.9 m = E � C Z to O O m Z 32 O � 3m� 70 Z W o - a 1p E LL 5 Z2 O-PACR N 7 Lo r Ln N FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC'SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost 1 Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage AerP V. Elementary Middle School Sr High 0.00 _..._......._..._... $0 ....._..........._...................__..._. 4_17 __._..._0.3030 MrK 0.0929 $0 $0 21;80 $87,747 _.. _.........__._ _ 921 0.2013 ...... 0:0410 $418 $85 _ _._0......1 1.20 $173,833 133 0.2013 0.0628 $316 $98 School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac./ . Facility Facility Total So Ft Cncr Elementary Middle School Sr High i V 1 ALl 6734 1 $1841 Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ on" 96.60% $0 417 0.3030 arlc mrK 0.0929 96.60% $18,352,956 _ ._...w_. 921 w_ _..._ 0.2013 _ $0 $0 0.041_0 $3,875 $789 96.60% $28,968,637 933 ..._ .. 0.2013 0.0628 $6,438 $1,884 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. Facility Total So Ft Cnet Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Facility Factor Q;e o> n J UJ AL $Y,913 $2,673 Student Factor Cost/ Cost/ 3 $0 — 25 �-- -- 0.3030 ,.0 ,� 0.0929 Jrlc AWK $0 $0 3.40% ........_.......__...._ ._ $0 ..._.._..._.._.... _. _. _._......_._._. 25 0.2013 _ 0.041_0 $0 $0 3.40% $82,151 25......_....__.0.2013 0.2013 _ 0.0628 $22 $7 TOTAL $22 $7 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sa Ft Qt.d—t KA.. 1. ..,-., Elementary Middle School New Sr High $129.81 90 ------- 0.00% "--- 0.3030 =,.. i. 0.0929 Jill 1v1rK $0 $0 129.81 117 0.00% 0.2013 0.0410 $0 $0 129.81 130 5 997% 0.2013 0.0628 $2,037 $636 Total $2,037 $636 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2005) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2005) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream SFR MFR $224,943 $53,384 4.57% 4.5_7_% $1,773,800 $420,962 �µ 10 10 $1.04 $1.04 $1,845 $438 Single Fancily Multi.Family 26 Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 734 $ 184 Permanent Facility Cost $ 9,913 $ 2,673 Temporary Facility Cost $ 22 $ 7 State Match Credit $ (2,037) $ (636) Tax Payment Credit $ (1,845) $ (438) Sub -Total $ 6,787 $ 1,790 50% Local Share $ 3,393 $ 895 Impact Fee $ 3,393 $ 895 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2005 Plan and the 2006 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2006/2012 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2005/06 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the opening of Sequoyah Middle School. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2006 through 2012. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACQUISITION COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage for Sequoyah Middle School. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre baseline cost and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3 -acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. Sequoyah: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312 900 (60 % of $521,500, 1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA $ 208,600 (40% o14521,500, 12 acres of 3 acre parcel) Cost/Acreage $ 208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWPA $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cost $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected -to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students. The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High .school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal WayHi h Total Cost $28,968,637 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.32 to 96.60% Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.68 to 3.40% Updated portable inventory Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $114.88 to $129.81 Change per OSPI State Match 59.97 % (No Change) Average Assessed Value SFR — Per Puget Sound Educational $213,859 to $224,943 Service District (ESD 121) MFR — $44,571 to $53,384 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.35% to 4.57% Market Rate Popertyr Tax Levy Rate $1.40 to $1.04 King County Treasury Division Square Foot Allocations Legislative Change (Effective Elementary 80 to 90 sq ft 2006/07) Middle School 110 to 117 sq ft High School 120 to 130 sq ft Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3138 to.3030 Middle School .1632 to .2013 High School .1695 to .2013 Multi -Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .119 to .0929 Middle School .042 to .0410 High School .053 to .0628 no] Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to educate all students in academic knowledge, skills, abilities and responsible behavior to be successful, contributing members of a free society. Vision All students proficient in reading and math All students will meet or exceed standards in reading and math on all WASL tests. Federal Way Public Schools 3140518`* Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. June 2005 P/T#5 City of Auburn Arts, Parks and Recreation Plan (2005-2010). Incorporate the Auburn Arts, Parks, and Recreation Plan (2005-2010) as an element of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. NOTE This is the same document adopted by the Auburn City Council earlier in 2005 by Resolution No. 3831. This amendment formally incorporates the Plan as an element of the Auburn GMA Comprehensive Plan. Copies of the document are available for review in the Auburn City Clerk's office. P/T#6 Update to City of Auburn Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan for years 2006-2011. Incorporate the City of Auburn Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (2006-2011) as an element of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. NOTES Atahuq ed''"version; n©uu inre orporates a11.revisons identifiied in prior revision sheets WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY (printed 11/22/05) CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2006 -2011) Adopted by Ordinance No. XXXX, December 5, 2005 as part of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan City of Auburn 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 931-3000 www.auburnwa.gov City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction Purpose....................................................................................................................... 7 Statutory Requirement for Capital Facilities Elements ................................................. 7 Concurrency and Level of Service............................................................................... 8 Implementation............................................................................................................ 9 2. Goals and Policies 1. Capital Facilities Response to Growth.................................................................... 11 2. Financial Feasibility................................................................................................ 11 3. Public Health and Environment.............................................................................. 13 4. Consistency With Regional Planning...................................................................... 14 3. Capital Improvements Introduction.................................................................................................................. 15 Airport.......................................................................................................................... 16 Cemetery..................................................................................................................... 30 CommunityCenter....................................................................................................... 34 CommunityImprovement............................................................................................. 37 FireProtection............................................................................................................. 48 General Municipal Buildings........................................................................................ 52 GolfCourse.................................................................................................................. 60 Library.......................................................................................................................... 65 Parks and Recreations................................................................................................. 66 Police........................................................................................................................... 87 SeniorCenter............................................................................................................... 89 SanitarySewer............................................................................................................ 90 SolidWaste.................................................................................................................. 98 StormDrainage............................................................................................................99 Transportation............................................................................................................117 Water......................................................................................................................... 173 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A capital facilities element is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA). Capital facilities generally have long useful lives, significant costs and tend not to be mobile. The GMA requires that capital facilities elements include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities and at least a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The GMA also requires that the land use element be reassessed if probable funding falls short of existing needs. This document is the City's six-year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP, in conjunction with other City adopted documents, satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities Element. It addresses one of the GMA's basic tenets, that is, the provision of adequate facilities to support development in accordance with locally adopted level of service standards. This CFP will enable the City to: (1) Make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars, and (2) Make timely decisions about maintaining levels of service in accordance with this CFP and other adopted plans. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT This CFP consists of the following: Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Goals and Policies Chapter 3. Capital Improvements Purpose of CFP, statutory requirements, methodology. Goals and Policies related to the provision of capital facilities. Proposed capital projects, which include the financing plan and reconciliation of project capacity to level of service (LOS) standards This CFP is a companion document to the Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 5). The Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan identifies the City's planning approach and policy framework for the provision of capital facilities. This CFP provides the background inventory, identifies proposed projects and establishes the six-year capital facilities plan for financing capital facilities. City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS In planning for capital facilities, consideration of future growth needs to be considered. The CFP is based on the following City population forecast: Year Population 2005 47,470 2006 51,655 2011 70,252 The population forecasts are based on information from the State of Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) as well as estimates developed by the City of Auburn Planning and Community Development Department. CAPITAL COSTS OF FACILITIES Based on the analysis of capital improvements contained in this document, the cost of City -owned and managed capital improvements for 2006-2011 is summarized as follows: Type of Facility 2006-2011 Airport $ 1,411,500 Cemetery 500,000 Community Center 5,150,000 Community Improvement 4,717,000 Fire Protection 250,000 General Municipal Buildings 20,602,000 Golf Course 4,515,000 Parks & Recreation 7,627,000 Sewer 12,106,000 Storm Drainage 9,913,000 Transportation 79,447,300 Water 13,221,000 Total $ 159,459,800 2 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES The financing plan for the Citywide capital improvements includes: Funding Source 2006-2011 Capital Facility Grants 930,500 Airport 3,115,000 Parks & Recreation 95,000 Community Improvements 41,402,700 Transportation User Fees 481,000 Airport 165,000 Golf Course 300,000 Equipment Rental 50,000 Parks & Recreation 8,480,000 Sewer 9,926,000 Storm Drainage 12,134,000 Water Arterial Street Fund 4,476,000 Transportation G.O. Bonds 5,000,000 Community Center 500,000 Cemetery 4,350,000 Golf Course 20,000,000 Fire Station Relocation 1,280,000 Transportation General Fund 3,560,000 Community Improvements 250,000 Fire Protection 875,000 Parks & Recreation Municipal Parks Fund 150,000 Community Center 1,807,000 Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement Fund 62,000 Community Improvements 180,000 Parks & Recreation 170,000 General Municipal Buildings Local Street Improvement Fund 10,000 Transportation Levy Lid Lift 5,669,400 Transportation Property Tax - New Construction 230,600 Transportation Public Works Trust Fund 1,100,000 Water Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 3,600,000 Sewer 800,000 Transportation Mitigation/Impact Fees 3,811,700 Transportation REET1 132,000 General Municipal Buildings REET2 1,500,000 Parks & Recreation 1,000,000 Community Improvements 4,545,000 Transportation Developer/Private Contributions 750,000 Transportation Other Sources 100,000 Parks & Recreation 16,471,900 Transportation Total $ 159,459,800 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS The forecasted impacts of new capital facilities on the City's future operating budgets (2007-2012) are as follows: Budget Year: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Airport - - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 24,000 2 Cemetery - - - - - - - 3 Community Center - - - - - - - 4 Community Improvements - - - - - - - 5 Fire Protection - - - - - - - 6 General Municipal Buildings - - - - - - - 7 Golf Course - - - - - - - 8 Library - - - - - - - 9 Parks & Recreation - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 10 Police - - - - - - - 11 Senior Center - - - - - - - 12 Sanitary Sewer - - - - - - - 13 Storm Drainage 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 18,000 14 Transportation 10,296 10,999 32,263 54,426 54,426 105,767 268,177 15 Water (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (800) (10,800) Total 10,296 35,999 63,263 87,426 87,426 139,967 424,377 4 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP Based on the proposed six-year capital projects and the projected population increase of 22,782 (48%), the LOS for the following City -owned public facilities will change as follows: The LOS for the following facilities will be increased as a result of the CFP. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2005 LOS CFP LOS Community Center Sq. Ft. per 1, 000 Pop. - 498.00 The LOS for the following facilities will be maintained as a result of the CFP. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2005 LOS CFP LOS Roads Volume/Capacity Ratio "D" "D" Airport % Air O erations Support 100% 100% Sanitary Sewer Residential GPCPD (Note 1) 158.00 158.00 Storm Draina e N/A 4.98 3.36 Water Residential GPCPD (Note 1) 1 236.001 236.00 Note 1: GPCPD = Gallons per Customer per Day Acres per 1,000 Pop. 4.19 The LOS for the following facilities will be reduced as a result of the CFP. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2005 LOS CFP LOS Cemetery Burial Plots per 1,000 Pop. 53.93 44.24 General Municipal Buildings Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop. 3,778.09 2,551.15 Neighborhood Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 1.12 0.76 Community Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 4.98 3.36 Linear Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.67 0.45 Oen Space Acres per 1,000 Pop. 4.19 2.83 Special Use Areas Acres.per 1,000 Pop. 1.14 0.77 Golf Course Acres.per 1,000 Pop. 0.38 0.26 Fire Protection Apparatus per 1,000 Pop. 0.27 0.18 Library Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop. 315.99 213.37 City Jail Beds per 1,000 Pop. 1.14 0.77 Senior Center Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop. 265.43 179.23 As indicated in the chart above, a significant increase in population without a corresponding increase in the unit of measure (square footage, acreage, etc.), will naturally result in a reduced level of service. In some cases, the unit of measure will remain constant, but a greater number of people will be accessing the property resulting in a reduced level of service. For example, a park's acreage remains constant, but increased population brings more people to that park. On the other hand, other facilities such as buildings may be remodeled or expanded to keep pace with population growth. This would prevent or minimize the reduced level of service. The impact of population growth to the level of service for facilities will vary depending on the type of facility and long range planning by the City. City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) are principally the master plans for the various public facilities included in this CFP. These individual master plans provide detailed identification of projects and identify their (projects) proposed funding sources. City documents include: • City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2003); • City Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (2001-2020); • City Comprehensive Water Plan (2001); • City Comprehensive Transportation Plan (1997) and Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2006-2011); • City Comprehensive Drainage Plan (2002); • City Comprehensive Sewer Plan (2001); • City 2006 Budget and 2004 Annual Financial Report; and, • Master plan update for parks, as well as numerous other planning and financial documents. All documents are available for public inspection at the City of Auburn. 6 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a 6 -year plan (2006-2011) for capital improvements that support the City of Auburn's current and future growth. In this plan, funding for general government projects are identified. To maintain consistency with individual master and utility comprehensive plans, applicable projects in the 6 -year window of those master/utility plans are included in this CFP. The CFP also identifies LOS standards, where applicable, for each public facility. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d) requires that the comprehensive plan capital facilities element include "a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes." RCW 36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have "probable funding" to pay for capital facility needs, or else the City must "reassess the land use element." In addition, the capital facilities element must include the location and capacity of existing facilities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed locations and capacities. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accomplished for water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, police and fire protection facilities. The GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital facilities. As a result, public facilities in the CFP should be based on quantifiable, objective measures of capacity such as traffic volume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In some instances, though, level of service may best be expressed in terms of qualitative statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility. Factors that influence local level of service standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, national and local standards, and federal and state mandates. To be effective, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines suggest that the CFP be updated at least every two years. The City will seek to update the CFP annually in order to incorporate the capital facilities improvements in the City's annual budget process. 7 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Concurrency The GMA requires that jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place or available within a specified time frame when development occurs. This concept is called concurrency. Under the GMA, concurrency is required for transportation facilities, and is recommended by the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer. Concurrency has a direct relationship to levels of service. The importance of concurrency to capital facilities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the level of service for a capital facility below the locally adopted minimum. Explanation of Levels of Service As indicated earlier, the GMA requires level of service be established for certain transportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrency to development proposals. The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of levels of service standards for other capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public facilities. Typically, measures of levels of service are expressed as ratios of facility capacity to demand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1 lists generic examples of levels of service measures for some capital facilities: TABLE 1-1 Sample Level of Service Measurements Type of Facility Sample Level of Service Measure General Municipal Buildings Square feet per 1,000 population Parks Acres per 1,000 population Roads and Streets Ratio of actual volume to design capacity Sewer/ Water Gallons per customer per day The need for capital facilities is largely determined by a community's adopted LOS standards and whether or not the community has formally designated capital facilities, other than transportation, as necessary for development to meet the concurrency test. The CFP itself is therefore largely influenced by the selection of the level of service standards. Levels of service standards are measures of the quality of life of the City. The standards should be based on the City's vision of its future and its values. 0 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. The CFP is sensitive to funding and revenue availability and therefore needs to be constantly monitored against variations in available resources. To facilitate its implementation, the CFP should be kept current. Update of Capital Facilities Plan Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFP current is to update it regularly so the six-year plan is a rolling CFP. Again, the State recommends that the CFP be updated at least biennially. The City of Auburn will seek to update the CFP annually in conjunction with the budget process. Future updates will consider: A. Revision of population projections, including annexations; B. Update of inventory of public facilities; C. Update of costs of public facilities; D. Update of public facilities requirements analysis (actual levels of service compared to adopted standards); E. Update of revenue forecasts; F. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next six fiscal years; and, G. Update analysis of financial capacity. Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to levels of service standards, capital projects, and/or the financing plan sources of revenue are all actions that can keep the CFP current and relevant to City decision-making. Q City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary cYry CW * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEI 10 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CHAPTER 2 GOALS AND POLICIES This chapter identifies goals and policies specific to the City's provision of capital facilities. Goal 1 Provide a variety of responses to the demands of growth on public facilities. Policy 1.1 Establish land use patterns that optimize the use of public facilities. Policy 1.2 Provide additional public facility capacity when existing facilities are used to their maximum level of efficiency (consistent with adopted standards for levels of service). Policy 1.3 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an efficient manner. Policy 1.4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program: 1.4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.26.095, 58.17.033 or 58.17.170. 1.4.2 Development that creates no added impact on public facilities. 1.4.3 Expansions of existing development that were disclosed and tested for concurrency as part of the original application. Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the City to fund or within the City's authority to require others to provide. Policy 2.1 Establish level of service standards that are achievable with the financing plan of this Capital Facilities Plan. Policy 2.2 Base the financing plan for public facilities on realistic estimates of current local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be received by the City. Policy 2.3 Match revenue sources to capital projects on the basis of sound fiscal policies. 2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs through utility enterprise funds, based on user fees and grants. Public facilities that are utilities are sewer, solid waste, storm drainage, and water. 2.3.2 Where feasible pursue joint venture facility construction, 11 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary construction timing, and other facility coordination measures for City provided facilities, as well as with school districts and other potential partners in developing public facilities. 2.3.3 The City shall continue to assist through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available, the City may participate in developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the extent that the improvements benefit the broader public interest, and are consistent with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan. Policy 2.4 If the projected funding is inadequate to finance needed public facilities and utilities based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth, the City will do one or more of the following to achieve a balance between available revenue and needed public facilities: 2.4.1 lower the level of service standard; 2.4.2 increase the amount of revenue from existing sources; 2.4.3 adopt new sources of revenue; 2.4.4 require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense; and/or 2.4.5 amend the Land Use Element to reduce the need for additional public facilities. Policy 2.5 Both existing and future development will pay for the costs of needed capital improvements. 2.5.1 Ensure that existing development pays for capital improvements that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or all of the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Existing development may also pay a portion of the cost of capital improvements needed by future development. Existing development's payments may take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. 2.5.2 Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities which it requires. Future development may also pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. Future development's payments may take the form of voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of users fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. ME City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Policy 2.6 The City will determine the priority of public facility capital improvements using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue source that cannot be used for the highest priority will be used beginning with the highest priority for which the revenue can legally be expended. 2.6.1 Projects that eliminate hazardous conditions. 2.6.2 Refurbishment of existing facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining standards for adopted levels of service. 2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in levels of service for existing demand. 2.6.4 New or expanded facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new development and redevelopment during the next six fiscal years. 2.6.5 Capital improvements that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility, or otherwise mitigate impacts of public facilities on future operating budgets. 2.6.6 Capital improvements that contribute to stabilizing and developing the economy of the City. 2.6.7 Project priorities may also involve additional criteria that are unique to each type of public facility, as described in other elements of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 2.7 Ensure that the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the facility. Goal 3 Protect public health, environmental quality, and neighborhood stability and viability through the appropriate design and installation of public facilities. Policy 3.1 Promote conservation of energy, water and other natural resources in the location and design of public facilities. Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered. Policy 3.3 Practice efficient and environmentally responsible maintenance and operating procedures. Policy 3.4 The siting, design, construction and improvement of all public buildings shall be done in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stability and growth through strategic investments in public facilities and public private/partnerships. 13 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Goal 4 Make the Capital Facilities Plan consistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan, and - to the extent feasible - with other city, county, regional and state adopted plans. Policy 4.1 Ensure that the growth and development assumptions used in the Capital Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of the comprehensive plan. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non -city providers of public facilities on a joint program for maintaining applicable levels of service standards, concurrency requirements, funding and construction of public facilities. 14 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CHAPTER 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. INTRODUCTION This CFP includes City capital improvement projects, and the financing plan to pay for those projects. It also contains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies a level of service standard, where applicable. Each type of City public facility is presented in a separate subsection that follows a standard format. Throughout this section, tables of data are identified with abbreviations that correspond to the type of facility: For example, Table W-1 refers to Table 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreviation corresponds to the name of the type of facility. 1. Narrative Summary This is an overview of the data, with sections devoted to Current Facilities, Level of Service, Capital Facilities Projects and Financing, and Impact on Future Operating Budgets. 2. Inventory of Facilities (Table X-1) This is a list of existing capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to levels of service), and location. This table also includes any proposed capital projects and the planned inventory total as of December 31, 2011. 3. Capital Projects and Financing Plan (Table X-2) This is a list of capital improvements that identifies existing deficiencies, identifies facilities needed for future growth, and identifies the repairing or replacing of obsolete or worn out facilities through December 31, 2011. Each list shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. 4. Impact on Future Operating Budgets (Table X-3) This is a list of new capital projects and the forecasted impacts on the City's future operating budgets (2007 — 2012). 15 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT Current Facilities The City of Auburn operates the Auburn Municipal Airport, providing hangar and tie - down facilities/leasing space for aircraft -related businesses. As of 2002, there were approximately 141,000 take -offs and landings (aircraft operations) at the airport annually. Table A-1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities with current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The Auburn Municipal Airport Master Plan Update 2001-2020 provides a maximum runway capacity (LOS standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annually; one take- off or landing equals one aircraft operation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA requires the airport to have the capital facilities capacity (i.e., runways, taxiways, holding areas, terminal, hangars, water/sewer system, etc.) necessary to accommodate 100% of aircraft operations during any one year. By 2020 the Airport Master Plan forecasts the number of operations to be 193,189 — well below the capacity of the airport runway. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's Airport facilities include seven non -capacity capital projects at a cost of $1,411,500. These projects are for facilities repairs and improvements. Table A-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table A-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $24,000 are forecasted for Airport facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. 16 TABLE A - 1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Airport CAPACITY FACILITY # of Aircraft # of Feet LOCATION Existing Inventory: Hangars 145 400 23rd Street NE Tiedowns 214 400 23rd Street NE Air Strip 3,400 400 23rd Street NE Total Existing Inventory 359 3,400 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - - 2011 Projected Inventory Total 359 3,400 17 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE A-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING AIRPORT 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - Non -Capacity Projects: 1 Airport Security Capital Costs 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 2 Hangar Header Repair Capital Costs 70,000 50,000 50,000 - - - 170,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 70,000 50,000 50,000 - - - 170,000 3 General Repair & Maint. Projects Capital Costs - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Funding Sources: Grants - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 4 Ground Door Seals Capital Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 5 Airport Signage Capital Costs 7,500 - - - - - 7,500 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 7,500 - - - - - 7,500 6 Automated Gates Capital Costs 14,000 - - - - - 14,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 14,000 - - - - - 14,000 7 Security Fencing Capital Costs 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 15,000 - - - - - 15,000 Grants 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 8 Airport Wind Indicator Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 Grants 9,000 - - - - - 9,000 9 Pavement Striping & Sealcoating Capital Costs 170,000 - - - - - 170,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 8,500 - - - - - 8,500 Grants 161,500 - - - - - 161,500 18 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE A-2, cont. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING AIRPORT SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects 341,500 240,000 240,000 190,000 200,000 200,000 1,411,500 Total Costs 341,500 240,000 240,000 190,000 200,000 200,000 1,411,500 FUNDING SOURCES: Airport Fund 161,000 90,000 90,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 481,000 Grants 180,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 930,500 Total Funding 341,500 240,000 240,000 190,000 200,000 200,000 1,411,500 19 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Airport Security Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Enterprise Funds Description: Increased security identified as one of the highest priority needs for the airport in the 2005 Development Plan. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 40,000 40,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 40,000 40,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 40,000 40,000 Total Expenditures: - - 40,000 40,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 Grants - - - - - _ Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 260,000 20 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Enterprise Funds Hangars - Header Beam Evaluation / Repair & Replacement Description: Evaluate and structurally test suspected failing header beams on hangars 2 through 8. Once the headers are identified, they will be prioritized and scheduled for replacement. Following evaluation, repair and/or replacement will begin. Those beams in the worst condition will be repaired/replaced first, proceeding with less critical repairs. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Bi -annual maintenance and inspection cost for this project is estimated at $6,000 per year. Maintenance includes painting, cleaning or sealing as recommended by manufacturer. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 70,000 70,000 Grants - - - Bond Proceeds - - Impact Fees - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 70,000 70,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - Right of Way - - - Construction - 70,000 70,000 Total Expenditures: - - 70,000 70,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue 50,000 50,000 - 170,000 Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 - - - 170,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 - - 170,000 Total 50,000 50,000 - - - 170,000 21 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Airport Projects - General Repair & Maintenance Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Enterprise Funds Description: Various airport projects will be identified and prioritized on an annual basis as grant funding is received. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - - Grants 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Total 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 22 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Ground Door Seals - Hangar Row 2 Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Enterprise Funds Description: Remove and replace ground door seals which have deteriorated over the past 30 years. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 5,000 5,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 5,000 5,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 5,000 5,000 Total Expenditures: - - 5,000 5,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - 5,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 5,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 5,000 Total - - - - - 5,000 23 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Airport Signage Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Replace airport's safety, security and directional signage as required by FAA. (e.g. "no trespassing", "fire extinguisher", speed limits, airport directory near front entrance, etc.) Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 7,500 7,500 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 7,500 7,500 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 7,500 7,500 Total Expenditures: - - 7,500 7,500 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - 7,500 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 7,500 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 7,500 Total - - - - - 7,500 24 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Automated Gates Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Replacement of two remaining automated gate operators. Two of four were replaced in 2005 by AMG. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 14,000 14,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 14,000 14,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 14,000 14,000 Total Expenditures: - - 14,000 14,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - 14,000 Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 14,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - 14,000 Total - - - - - 14,000 25 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Airport Security Fencing Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Install 2,200 linear feet of fencing on the west side of the property. This area has been unfenced to date. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 15,000 15,000 Grants - - 10,000 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 25,000 25,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 25,000 25,000 Total Expenditures: - - 25,000 25,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - 15,000 Grants - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 25,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 25,000 Total - - - - - 25,000 26 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Airport Wind Indicator Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Repair or replace segmented circle that has badly deteriorated. The segmented circle is designed to draw visual attention to the Airport wind indicator located within the circle and to provide visual traffic pattern information at airports without operating control towers. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 1,000 1,000 Grants - - 9,000 9,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 10,000 10,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 10,000 10,000 Total Expenditures: - - 10,000 10,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - 1,000 Grants - - - - - 9,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 10,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 10,000 Total - - - - - 10,000 27 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Striping and Sealcoating Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Striping and sealcoating bid for taxiway and aircraft parking lot. The asphalt has deteriorated to the critical stage of cracking at areas other than seams. Asphalt is alligatoring (failure of asphalt bonding). Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 8,500 8,500 Grants - - 161,500 161,500 Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 170,000 170,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 170,000 170,000 Total Expenditures: - - 170,000 170,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - 8,500 Grants - - - - - 161,500 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 170,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 170,000 Total - - - - - 170,000 28 TABLE A-3 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Impact on Future Operating Budgets AIRPORT Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Airport Security - - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 24,000 2 Hangar/Header Evaluation 3 Hangar/Header Replacement - - - - - - - 4 Ground Door Seals - - - - - - - 5 Airport Signage - - - - - - - 6 Automated Gates - - - - - - - 7 Security Fencing - - - - - - - 8 end Indicator - - - - - - - 9 Pavement Maintenance - - - - - - - Total - - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 24,000 29 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CEMETERY Current Facilities The City owns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (50 acres and four buildings) that provides burial services and related merchandise for the community. The Pioneer Cemetery is a historic cemetery which is no longer used for burial purposes. Table C-1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 55 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 Citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 44 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected Citywide population of 70,252. In addition the cemetery will be able to offer a natural cremation garden. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's Mountain View Cemetery facilities include one capital project at a cost of $500,000, which includes a chapel/niche mausoleum. Table C-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the cemetery during the six years 2007 — 2012. City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE C-1 ACILITY sting Inventory: untain View Cemetery neer Cemetery Total Existing Inventory Capacity Projects: Chapel/Niche Mausoleum Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total Facilities Inventory Cemetery # of burial plots/niches LOCATION 31 2,560 2020 Mountain View Dr. 2,560 500 500 8th & Auburn Way No. City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE C-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING CEMETERY Capacity Projects: 1 Chapel/Niche Mausoleum Capital Costs Funding Sources: Cemetery Fund Bond Proceeds SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects Non -Capacity Projects Total Costs FUNDING SOURCES: Cemetery Fund Bond Proceeds Total Funding 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 32 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CEMETERY FUND (436) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Cemetery Expansion -Phase 1 (Chapel, Mausoleum) Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Arnie Galli, Dan Scamporlina Description: Create conceptual design drawings for a chapel/niche mausoleum. Construction on Mausoleum to begin in 2006. The capital development in 2006 would extend grave inventory by 5 years and cremation niche/plot inventory by 10 years while adding new options. The mausoleum structure will add 348 interior glass -front niches, 258 exterior granite -front niches, and 128 granite -front niches in a courtyard setting. Additional turf development will yield 1,000 full size graves including 30 monument plots and 800 ground cremation plots, including 20 monument plots. This development closely follows the updated Master Plan completed for the Mountain View Cemetery completed in 2004. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Cemetery Revenue - 25,000 25,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - 500,000 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 25,000 500,000 525,000 Capital Costs: Design 25,000 - 25,000 Right of Way - - - Construction - 500,000 500,000 Total Expenditures: - 25,000 500,000 525,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Cemetery Revenue - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total - - - - - 500,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 500,000 Total - - - - - 500,000 33 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary COMMUNITY CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently does not have a community center. Level of Service (LOS) The City does not have a current LOS for a community center. The proposed LOS of 509 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected Citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The proposed Community Center facility construction project will cost approximately $5,150,000. Table CC -2 shows the proposed financing plan. Impact on Future Operating Budgets Based on outcome of feasibility study, increased costs to the general fund may be seen. TABLE CC -1 Facilities Inventory Community Center AC I LITY kisting Inventory: Total Existing Inventory posed Capacity Projects: ,v Community Center Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total 34 CAPACITY Square Fee 35,000 35,000 35,000 LOCATION City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE CC -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING COMMUNITY CENTER 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: 1 Community Center - Convert & expand former YMCA Building into a Community Center (+ 35,000 sf) Capital Costs 50,000 100,000 5,000,000 - 5,150,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 50,000 100,000 - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 Non -Capacity Projects: none SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 50,000 100,000 5,000,000 - 5,150,000 Non -Capacity Projects - - - - - - Total Costs 50,000 100,000 5,000,000 - - 5,150,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Municipal Park Fund 50,000 100,000 - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 Total Funding 50,000 100,000 5,000,000 - - 5,150,000 35 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Auburn Community Center Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Daryl Faber Description: Construction and/or renovation of the existing YMCA building located at Les Gove Park. Progress Summary: Community committee is being formed to work with consultant on preferred outcomes. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Based on the outcome of the feasibility study, increased cost to the general fund may be seen. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 50,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Tota/ Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund 100,000 - - - - 150,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 100,000 5,000,000 - - - 5,150,000 Capital Costs: Design 100,000 200,000 - - - 350,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 4,800,000 - - - 4,800,000 Total 100,000 5,000,000 - - - 5,150,000 36 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT Current Facilities In 2002, the City entered into a 99 -year lease with the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) for the use of 180 parking stalls and the right to sublease the Commercial Tenant area of the transit center parking garage and retail area. Level of Service (LOS) No Levels of Service for community improvement projects have been identified at this time. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's proposed Community Improvement facilities include nine capital projects at a cost of $4,717,000. Table CI -2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for community improvement projects annually during the six years 2007 — 2012. 37 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE CI -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS (Planning/Engineering) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none Non -Capacity Pro'icts: - - - - - - - 1 Gateway Program 1,067,000 735,000 765,000 735,000 765,000 650,000 4,717,000 Capital Costs 60,000 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 650,000 260,000 Funding Sources: General Fund 60,000 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 - 260,000 2 Downtown Redevelopment 312,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,062,000 Capital Costs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources: 1,067,000 735,000 765,000 735,000 765,000 650,000 4,717,000 General Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 3 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: REET2 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 4 Neighborhood Revitalization Capital Costs 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Funding Sources: General Fund 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 - 300,000 5 Wayfinding Signage Capital Costs 95,000 - - - - 95,000 Funding Sources: Grants 95,000 - - - - - 95,000 6 Traffic Signal Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: REET2 100,000 - - - - 100,000 7 Traffic Calming Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: REET2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 8 School Zone Flashing Beacons Capital Costs 12,000 - - - - - 12,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improv. Fund 12,000 - - - - 12,000 9 Terminal Park Neighborhood Improvements, Phase 1 Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improv. Fund 50,000 - - - - 50,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects 1,067,000 735,000 765,000 735,000 765,000 650,000 4,717,000 Total Costs 1,067,000 735,000 765,000 735,000 765,000 650,000 4,717,000 FUNDING SOURCES: General Fund 660,000 585,000 615,000 585,000 615,000 500,000 3,560,000 Capital Improvement Fund 312,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,062,000 Grants 95,000 - - - - - 95,000 Total Funding 1,067,000 735,000 765,000 735,000 765,000 650,000 4,717,000 0 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PLANNING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Gateway Program Project No: C221 A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Paul Krauss General Fund Description: Ongoing project to market the City and to design and initiate construction of gateways throughout the City. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund 81,607 85,000 60,000 226,607 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: 81,607 85,000 60,000 226,607 Capital Costs: Design 81,607 - - 81,607 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 85,000 60,000 145,000 Total Expenditures: 81,607 85,000 60,000 226,607 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 - 260,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 - 260,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 - 260,000 Total 85,000 15,000 85,000 15,000 - 260,000 39 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PLANNING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Downtown Redevelopment Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager.: Paul Krauss / Dennis Dowdy Description: Ongoing project to purchase property, construct new buildings, and renovate existing structures. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - 500,000 500,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 500,000 500,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 500,000 500,000 Total Expenditures: - - 500,000 500,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 E City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PLANNING DEPT. Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Annual) Project Manager: TBD Description: Capital Facilities Plan General Fund Fund sidewalk improvements in a variety of locations within the City. An inventory was completed in 2004. A method to determine priorities will be developed using criteria such as: gap closure, safe walking routes for children, completion of downtown pedestrian corridor or linkage, connectivity to transit services, and ADA requirements. Progress Summary: In 2005 sidewalk replacements are being done at various locations around the City. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total REET2 - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Capital Costs: Design - 15,000 10,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 85,000 90,000 175,000 Total Expenditures: - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 REET2 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Costs: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 41 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PLANNING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Neighborhood Revitalization Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: Neighborhood revitalization has been a high priority for the Council for several years. With an initial funding level of $100,000 the City completed the Terminal Park Plan in-house and is now undertaking other improvement projects. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - 100,000 100,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 100,000 100,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures: - - 100,000 100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Total - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 42 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PLANNING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Wayfinding Signage Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: A Citywide Wayfinding Destination and Design System Manual will be developed by early 2006. The manual will outline/categorize activity centers and locations for signage. The manual will also include design guidelines for signage. Once the manual is completed, fabrication of signage can commence. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Grants - - 95,000 95,000 Total Funding Sources: - - 95,000 95,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 95,000 95,000 Total Expenditures: - - 95,000 95,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund - - - - - - Grants - - - - - 95,000 Total - - - - - 95,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 95,000 Total - - - - - 95,000 43 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - ENGINEERING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Fund Project Title: Traffic Signal Improvements Project No: Project Type: Annual Project Manager: Ryan Johnstone Description: The City analyzes accident history and identifies locations with higher than acceptable rates. Typically, these involve signal locations where volumes have grown significantly, requiring signal modification. Signals that have accident patterns that are correctable are identified and the modifications are implemented. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total REET2 - 67,500 100,000 167,500 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 67,500 100,000 167,500 Capital Costs: Design - 2,500 5,000 7,500 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 65,000 95,000 160,000 Total Expenditures: - 67,500 100,000 167,500 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 REET2 - - - - - 100,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 100,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 95,000 Total - - - - - 100,000 44 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - ENGINEERING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Fund Project Title: Traffic Calming Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: The traffic department receives many requests for traffic calming in neighborhoods. This project is for various treatments designed to slow vehicles down and reduce cut -through traffic in residential areas. Treatments may include traffic circles or chicanes. Staff will continue to research newer and innovative methods to slow traffic. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total REET2 - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 45,000 45,000 Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 REET2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 270,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 45 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - ENGINEERING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: School Zone Flashing Beacons Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Ryan Johnstone Description: The City will be installing a pair of flashing beacons at two elementary schools in 2005. This is in financial partnership with the Auburn School District. Funds budgeted in 2006 are for the continued partnership with the district, and we anticipate the cost share to be 50/50. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Capital Improv. Fund - 19,700 12,000 31,700 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 19,700 12,000 31,700 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - 19,700 12,000 31,700 Total Expenditures: - 19,700 12,000 31,700 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - 12,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 12,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 12,000 Total - - - - - 12,000 46 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - ENGINEERING DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Terminal Park Neighborhood Improvements, Phase 1 Project No: C513A Project Type: Project Manager: Robert Lee Description: This project includes constructing new sidewalk, repairing existing sidewalks and constructing ADA curb ramps. This project will initially concentrate on the area near Terminal Park Elementary and Terminal Park. Progress Summary: The City received a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) in 2005 and moved the construction up. Construction will begin late 2005 and completed in 2006. It is anticipated the City will receive another grant in 2006 and the storm fund is contributing $50,000 for additional work. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Capital Improv. Fund - 57,000 50,000 107,000 Grants-CDBG 100,000 - 100,000 Utility Funds (Storm) - 150,000 - 150,000 Total Funding Sources: - 307,000 50,000 357,000 Capital Costs: Design - 30,000 - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 277,000 50,000 327,000 Total Expenditures: - 307,000 50,000 357,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - 50,000 Grants-CDBG - - - - - - Utility Funds (Storm) - - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 50,000 Total - - - - - 50,000 47 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary FIRE PROTECTION Current Facilities The Auburn Fire Department provides fire protection and rescue services to a 25 square mile area which includes the City of Auburn, the City of Algona and King County Fire Protection District 31. The Fire Department operates out of three stations which are manned 24 hours per day. The North Station #31 also serves as the department headquarters and includes a hose and training tower. Each station is assigned fire apparatus (Engines and Aid Vehicles). Table F — 1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 0.22 fire apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory (10 fire apparatus) divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 0.15 fire apparatus per 1,000 is based on the 2011 planned inventory (10 fire apparatus) divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing No expansion or the fire apparatus inventory is planned during 2006 — 2011. Fire apparatus replacement totaling $250,000 is based on a 20 -year replacement schedule for engines and a 15 -year replacement schedule for aid vehicles. Table F-2 shows the proposed financing plan. A fire station replacement/relocation project totaling $20,000,000 is planned. This project is shown in the General Municipal Buildings section. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for fire protection during the six years 2007 — 2012. TABLE F-1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Fire Department * Bus, Reserve Van, Disaster Response Vehicle ** Telesquirt 49 CAPACITY FACILITY Fire Apparatus Aid Vehicles Other LOCATION Existing Inventory: Stations: North Station #31 1101 'D' Street NE, Auburn First Line 1 1 - Reserve 1 1 - South Station #32 1951 'R' Street SE, Auburn First Line 1 1 - Reserve 1 1 - GSA Station #33 First Line 1 - - 2815 'C' Street SW, Auburn Reserve 1** - 3* Total Existing Inventory 6 4 3 Proposed Inventory Additions: None - - - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - - - 2011 Projected Inventory Total 6 4 3 * Bus, Reserve Van, Disaster Response Vehicle ** Telesquirt 49 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE F-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING FIRE DEPARTMENT 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects: 1 Apparatus Replacement Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Funding Sources: General Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total Costs - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 FUNDING SOURCES: General Fund - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Total Funding 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 50 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - FIRE PROTECTION Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Apparatus Replacement Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Fire apparatus replacement is based on a 20 -year replacement schedule for engines and a 15 -year replacement schedule for aid vehicles. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Replacement - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Capital Costs: Replacement 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 51 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Current Facilities The current inventory of City government administration and operations facilities include 85,505 square feet for general government operations, 62,188 square feet for police services, and 31,673 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 179,346 square feet. Table GM — 1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 3,871 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 2,611 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's General Municipal Buildings facilities include four capital projects at a cost of $20,602,000. The projects include (1) $20,000,000 for fire station replacement/relocation, (2) $552,000 for Jail remodel, Equipment Rental vehicle bay, and miscellaneous building improvements, and (3) $50,000 for parking lot maintenance at Safeway and surrounding businesses. Table GM — 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets Operating budget impacts annually are not yet forecasted for general municipal buildings during the six years 2007 — 2012. 52 TABLE GM -1 FACILITY Existing Inventory: City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory General Municipal Buildings CAPACITY Square Fee - LOCATION City Hall 37,700 25 W. Main Street City Maintenance & Operations Facility 25,855 1305 'C' Street SW Parks & Recreation Admin. Facility 7,000 910 9th Street SW Street Waste Handling Facility 2,750 1305 'C' Street SW Municipal Court (Justice Center) 12,200 340 E. Main Street Total 85,505 Headquarters (Justice Center) 24,800 340 E. Main Street Supermall substation 1,208 1101 Supermall Way Bicycle storage 300 15 N. Division Street Gun range 32,880 1600 Block 15th St. NW Seized vehicle parking stalls 3,000 C' Street SW (GSA) Total 62,188 Stations: North Station #31 South Station #32 GSA Station #33 Other Facilities: North Station Maint. Facility Total Total Existing Inventory Capacity Projects: Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total 53 12,220 1101 'D' Street NE 5,200 1951 'R' Street SE 9,533 2815 'C' Street SW 4,700 1101 'D' Street NE 31,653 179,346 1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE GM -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects: 1 Jail Remodel Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improv. Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 2 Miscellaneous Building Improvements Capital Costs 102,000 - - - - - 102,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improv. Fund 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 REET1 82,000 - - - - - 82,000 3 Safeway Parking Lot Maintenance Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: REET1 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 4 Fire Station Replacement / Relocation Capital Costs - 20,000,000 - - - 20,000,000 Funding Sources: Fire Impact Fees - - - - Bond Proceeds - 20,000,000 - - 20,000,000 5 Equipment Rental Vehicle Bay Capital Costs 300,000 - - - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Equip. Rental Fund 300,000 - - - 300,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects 602,000 20,000,000 - - 20,602,000 Total Costs 602,000 20,000,000 - - - - 20,602,000 FUNDING SOURCES: General Fund - - - - - Equip. Rental Fund 300,000 - - - 300,000 Capital Improv. Fund 170,000 - - - 170,000 REET1 132,000 - - 132,000 Bond Proceeds - 20,000,000 - 20,000,000 Total Funding 602,000 20,000,000 - - - - 20,602,000 54 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Jail Remodel Mark Ellingson Description: Remodel jail, including: employee locker room s/restroom s, inmate restrooms, admin. & booking areas, kitchen, laundry and control rooms. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Capital Improv. Fund - - 150,000 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 150,000 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 150,000 150,000 Total Expenditures: - - 150,000 150,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total - - - - - 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 150,000 Total - - - - - 150,000 55 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Misc. Building Improvements Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Mark Ellingson General Fund Description: Miscellaneous projects to include: Parks admin. roof replacement, Parks admin. restroom remodel, Council chamber diases replacement, carpet replacement within City Hall, glaze windows at Justice Center. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Capital Improv. Fund - - 20,000 20,000 REET1 - - 82,000 82,000 Total Funding Sources: - - 102,000 102,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 102,000 102,000 Total Expenditures: - - 102,000 102,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - 20,000 REET1 - - - - - 82,000 Total - - - - - 102,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 102,000 Total - - - - - 102,000 Tel City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 General Fund Project Title: Safeway Parking Lot Maintenance Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Mark Ellingson Description: Maintenance of public parking lot adjacent to Safeway, to include slurry seal, restripe, minor repairs and landscaping. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total REET1 - - 50,000 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 50,000 50,000 Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 REET1 - - - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 Total - - - - - 50,000 57 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - FIRE PROTECTION Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Fire Station Relocation Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Capital Facilities Plan General Fund Description: Relocate two fire stations, build downtown station and either remodel Station 32 or partner with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to relocate. Progress Summary: Investigating costs at this time Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Unknown at this time. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund - - - - - - Fire Impact Fees Bond Proceeds 20,000,000 - - - - 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 - - - - 20,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 20,000,000 - - - - 20,000,000 Total 20,000,000 - - - - 20,000,000 58 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Equipment Rental Vehicle Bay Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Add additional vehicle bay at equipment rental shop for heavy equipment and large vehicles, to improve efficiency and remove choke points. This bay will also be large enough to accommodate fire emergency vehicles, providing needed workspace for the additional mechanic. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - 300,000 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 300,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 25,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 275,000 275,000 Total Expenditures: - - 300,000 300,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total - - - - - 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - 275,000 Total - - - - - 300,000 59 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GOLF COURSE Current Facilities The City of Auburn owns and operates the 18 -hole Auburn Municipal Golf Course. A PGA Class A professional is contracted to collect greens fees, operate the pro shop and snack bar, provide golf carts for rent, and offer a lesson program. Table GC -1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of .39 holes per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of .26 holes per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing City golf course facilities include three capital projects at a cost of $4,515,000, which include (1) $4,000,000 to construct a new clubhouse and parking facility, and (2) $515,000 for rebuilding fairways and greens. Table GC -2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for new golf course facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. TABLE GC -1 ACILITY xisting Inventory: uburn Municipal Golf Course Total Existing Inventory Capacity Projects: Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total Facilities Inventory Golf Course # of holes LOCATION 18 29639 Green River Road 18 18 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE GC -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING GOLF COURSE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Proiects: 1 Rebuild Hole 11 Capital Costs 165,000 - - - - - 165,000 Funding Sources: Golf Course Fund 165,000 - - - - - 165,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 2 Reconstruct Holes 1, 2, 10 Capital Costs - - - - 350,000 - 350,000 Funding Sources: Golf Course Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 350,000 - 350,000 3 New Clubhouse and Parking Facilities Capital Costs 4,000,000 - - - - - 4,000,000 Funding Sources: Golf Course Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 4,000,000 - - - - - 4,000,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects 4,165,000 - - - 350,000 - 4,515,000 Total Costs 4,165,000 - - - 350,000 - 4,515,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Golf Course Fund 165,000 - - - - - 165,000 Bond Proceeds 4,000,000 - - - 350,000 - 4,350,000 Total Funding 4,165,000 - - - 350,000 - 4,515,000 61 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GOLF COURSE FUND (437) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Rebuild Hole 11 Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Kevin Van Description: Rebuild the green, tee and fairway. Install drainage and irrigation system, and add a 6-8" layer of sand throughout the site. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Year-round playable hole that will be safer for patrons, both visibly and routing wise; should increase the rounds played resulting in increased revenues. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - 165,000 165,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 165,000 165,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 165,000 165,000 Total Expenditures: - - 165,000 165,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - - - - 165,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 165,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 165,000 Total - - - - - 165,000 62 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GOLF COURSE FUND (437) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reconstruct Holes 1, 2, 10 Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Kevin Van Description: Renovate holes 1, 2 and 10. Progress Summary: In design phase; all permits have been secured. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: This project will increase the number of rounds played throughout the course. It will complete all major golf renovations which began in 1988. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - Impact Fees - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - 350,000 - 350,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - 350,000 - 350,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - 15,000 - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - 335,000 - 335,000 Total - - - 350,000 - 350,000 63 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GOLF COURSE FUND (437) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Clubhouse / Parking Lot Construction Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Daryl Faber Description: Design and construct Golf Course Clubhouse, including increased parking facilities. This project will replace existing clubhouse and inadequate parking. Progress Summary: Completing feasibility study in 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The Golf Course will generate revenue sufficient to pay off bond debt. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - - - Bond Proceeds - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 250,000 250,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 3,750,000 3,750,000 Total Expenditures: - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Golf Revenue - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 4,000,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 4,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 3,750,000 Total - - - - - 4,000,000 64 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary LIBRARY Current Facilities In 1997, the residents of Auburn voted to become part of the King County Library District. The Auburn Library, now a part of the King County Library System, serves the City of Auburn and outlying areas. Table L-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facility along with its current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 324 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 213 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing City library facilities include no new capital projects during 2006 — 2011. Impact on Future Operating Budgets Since there are no capital projects scheduled during 2007 — 2012, no operating budget impacts are forecasted for new library facilities. TABLE L-1 Facilities Inventory Library CAPACITY FACILITY (Square Feet) LOCATION Existing Inventory: urn Library Total Existing Inventory Capacity Projects: Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total 65 15,000 1102 Auburn Way S. 15,000 15,000 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary PARKS AND RECREATION Current Facilities The City of Auburn's park system consists of a total of 566.5 acres of neighborhood and community parks, special use areas, open space, and linear parks (trails). The 150 -acre Auburn Municipal Golf Course is identified as a separate public facility in this report, and is not included in the Parks and Recreation inventory. Table PR — 1 "Facilities Inventory" lists all park and recreation land in the City's park system along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS provided by the City's park system represents the current inventory of City -owned park acres divided by the 2005 City population of 47,470. This equates to 1.12 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 4.98 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.67 acres for linear parks, 4.19 acres for open space, and 1.14 acres for special use areas. The proposed LOS provided by the City's park system represents the planned 2011 inventory of City -owned park acres divided by the 2011 projected City population of 70,252. This equates to 0.76 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.36 acres per 1,00 population for community parks, 0.45 acres per 1,000 population for linear parks, 2.83 acres per 1,000 population for open space, and 0.77 acres per 1,000 population for special use acres. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Parks and Recreation facilities include fourteen capital projects at a cost of $7,627,000. Table PR — 2a,2b shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table PR — 3 shows, operating budget impacts of $125,000 are forecasted for parks and recreation facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. 0 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE PR -1 Facilities Inventory Parks and Recreation, Land ACILITY eighborhood Parks: Auburndale Park Ballard Park Cameron Park Cedar Lane Park Dykstra Park Forest Villa mini -park Gaines Park ndian Tom Park Lakeland Hills Park Rotary Park Shaughnessy Park Scootie Brown Park Terminal Park Jornada Park Auburndale 2 Park Total Neighborhood Parks None Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total - Neighborhood Parks - ommunity Parks: Brannan Park Veteran's Memorial Park Fenster/Green River Access Fulmer Field Game Farm Park Game Farm Wilderness Park GSA Park Isaac Evans Park Les Gave Park Mill Pond Olson Canyon Farmstead Roeaner Park 67 s) LOCATION 10.00 31700 108th NE 0.70 37th &'R' Street SE 3.90 Lemon Tree Lane & Academy Dr. 8.30 25th &'K' Street SE 1.70 1533 22nd Ave NE 0.20 17th & Fir Street SE 1.40 11th NW & W. Valley Highway 0.40 6th & Henry Road NE 5.00 5401 Olive Ave. SE 4.00 27th & Alpine Street SE 3.50 21st & Hemlock SE 1.70 8th & Henry Road NE 1.20 12th &'C' Street SE 1.90 1440 'U' Court NW 9.30 29700 118th Street SE 53.20 53.20 21.70 26th & 'M' Street NE 8.50 Park Ave. & AWN 13.40 10520 Auburn/Blk. Diamond Road 5.00 5th & 'K' Street NE 53.00 3226 'V' Street SE 20.00 2401 SE Stuck River Rd. 6.60 C' Street SW & 15th SW 14.90 29627 Green River Road NE 20.50 11th & AWS 4.00 600 Oravetz Road 15.00 28728 Green River Road 21.60 601 Oravetz Road City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary I ................. I ............... I ... ......... .................................................................................................................. . ........ Lea Hill Park . ............... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9.00 SE 319th & 124th Street SE Sunset Park 15.00 1306 69th Street SE Total Community Parks 228.20 Proposed Capacity Projects: Lakeland Hills Community Park 8.00 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 8.00 2011 Projected Inventory Total - Community Parks - 236.20 Linear Parks: Existing Inventory Interurban Trail 25.40 Lakeland Hills Trail 2.30 5401 Olive Ave. SE White River Trail 4.10 Total Linear Parks 31.80 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2011 Projected Inventory Total - Linear Parks - 31.80 Special Use Areas: Existing Inventory Bicentennial Park 1.40 SR -18 & AWS Centennial Viewpoint Park 0.70 600 Mountain View Drive City Hall Plaza 0.90 25 W. Main Clark Plaza 0.20 15th & AWN Downtown mini -mall 0.10 E. Main &'B'Street SE Mountain View Cemetery 50.00 2020 Mountain View Drive Pioneer Cemetery 0.80 8th & AWN Slaughter Memorial 0.20 3100 AWN Total Special Use Areas 54.30 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2011 Projected Inventory Total - Special Use Areas - 54.30 Open Space Areas: Existing Inventory Clark Property 25.00 1600 Oravetz Road Game Farm Open Space 87.00 2400 SE Stuck River Road Goff Course Open Space 42.00 29639 Green River Road Olson Canyon Open Space 45.00 28728 Green River Road Total Open Space Areas 199.00 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2011 Projected Inventory Total - Open Space Areas - 199.00 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE PR -2a CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING PARKS and RECREATION (Municipal Parks Construction Fund) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - Non -Capacity Proiects: 1 Fenster Farm Site Plan Capital Costs 570,000 - - - - 570,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 30,000 - - - - 30,000 State Grants 540,000 - - - - 540,000 2 Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Capital Costs 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 3 Game Farm Park - Soccer Fields Capital Costs 1,300,000 - - - - - 1,300,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Grants 600,000 - - - - - 600,000 REET 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 4 Lakeland Hills Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Developer Contrib. - - - - - - 5 Veteran's Park Capital Costs 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Private Donation 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 6 Auburn Environmental Park Capital Costs - 625,000 - - - - 625,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund - 625,000 - - - - 625,000 7 Olson Canyon Farm Capital Costs - 697,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - 1,447,000 Funding Sources: Municipal Park Fund - 397,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 772,000 Grants - 300,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 675,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Non -Capacity Proiects (cont.): 8 Park Acquisitions Capital Costs - 600,000 200,000 600,000 200,000 600,000 2,200,000 Funding Sources: REET - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 State Funds - 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 600,000 King County - 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 600,000 IO City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Special Use Areas: 9 Public Art Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Funding Sources: Capital Projects Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects 2,180,000 1,952,000 480,000 880,000 480,000 630,000 6,602,000 Total Costs 2,180,000 1,952,000 480,000 880,000 480,000 630,000 6,602,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Municipal Park Fund 410,000 1,022,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 1,807,000 Capital Projects Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Grants 1,140,000 500,000 125,000 325,000 125,000 200,000 2,415,000 Private Donation 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 REET 500,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,500,000 King County - 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 600,000 Total Funding 2,180,000 1,952,000 480,000 880,000 480,000 630,000 6,602,000 70 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Fenster Farm Site Plan - Phase 1 Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Coordinate with King County and Wa. State on development with natural habitat area. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 30,000 30,000 State (Salmon Recovery Fund) - - 240,000 240,000 State (Aquatic Lands) - - 300,000 300,000 REST - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 570,000 570,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 25,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 545,000 545,000 Total Expenditures: - - 570,000 570,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - 30,000 State (Salmon Recovery Fund) - - - - - 240,000 State (Aquatic Lands) - - - - - 300,000 REET - - - - - - Total - - - - - 570,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 545,000 Total - - - - - 570,000 71 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Project No: Project Type: Park Development Project Manager: Description: Coordinate with Auburn School District on Master Site Plan for 29 acre site. This project is contingent upon incorporation and City Council direction. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 30,000 30,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 30,000 30,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - 30,000 30,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - 30,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 30,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total - - - - - 30,000 72 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Game Farm Park Soccer Fields Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Daryl Faber Description: Upgrade existing dirt field to a synthetic surface. This will allow for year-round play as well as tournament competition. Progress Summary: Identifying partners and preparing grant submittals. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No increase in expenditures; Facility will generate $55,000 annually in user fees. In addition, Cell Antennas will generate $36,000 annually in user fees. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 200,000 200,000 Grants - - 600,000 600,000 REET - - 500,000 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 1,300,000 1,300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 60,000 60,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 1,240,000 1,240,000 Total Expenditures: - - 1,300,000 1,300,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - 200,000 Grants - - - - - 600,000 REST - - - - 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 1,300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - 60,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - 1,240,000 Total - - - - - 1,300,000 73 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Lakeland Hills Park Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Daryl Faber Description: Develop passive park, to include irrigation, playtoy, etc. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Developer Contrib. - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 50,000 50,000 Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - Developer Contrib. - - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 Total - - - - - 50,000 74 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Veteran's Park Redevelopment Project No: C31 OA Project Type: Community Building Replacement Project Manager: Description: Community building replacement. Progress Summary: Matching funds are available through the American Legion Post 78. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 100,000 100,000 Private Donations (Amer. Legion) - - 100,000 100,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 200,000 200,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 200,000 200,000 Total Expenditures: - - 200,000 200,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - 100,000 Private Donations (Amer. Legion) - - - - - 100,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 200,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 200,000 Total - - - - - 200,000 75 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Auburn Environmental Park Project No: C412A Project Type: Project Manager: Aaron Nix / Mitzi McMahan Description: Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: TBD Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - Utility Funds (Storm) - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund 625,000 - - - - 625,000 Utility Funds (Storm) - - - - - - Total 625,000 - - - - 625,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 625,000 - - - - 625,000 Total 625,000 - - - - 625,000 76 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Olson Canyon Farm Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Implement master -plan for building and grounds. Progress Summary: Design for stream restoration underway. Proposed project is dependent upon grants and may not be started in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: TBD Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - Grants - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund 397,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 772,000 Grants 300,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 675,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 697,000 250,000 250,000 2509000 - 1,447,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 697,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - 1,447,000 Total 697,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - 1,447,000 77 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Park Acquisitions Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Acquisitions to occur based on demand and deficiencies including corridors and trails. Capital Projects Funds Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: TBD Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - REET - - - - State Grant (IAC) - - - - KCCF - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - - REET 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 State Grant (lAC) 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 600,000 KCCF 200,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 600,000 Total 600,000 200,000 600,000 200,000 600,000 2,200,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 600,000 200,000 600,000 200,000 600,000 2,200,000 Total 600,000 200,000 600,000 200,000 600,000 2,200,000 78 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Capital Projects Funds Project Title: Public Art Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: The City designates $30,000 annually toward the purchase of public art, for placement at designated locations throughout the city. Progress Summary: Arts Commission is completing inventory and assessment of future needs to be approved by City Council. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Limited Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Capital Projects Fund 216,111 30,000 30,000 276,111 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 216,111 30,000 30,000 276,111 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction 216,111 30,000 30,000 276,111 Total Expenditures: 216,111 30,000 30,000 276,111 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Capital Projects Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 79 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE PR -2b CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING PARKS and RECREATION 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: none - Non -Capacity Proiects: 1 Les Gove Park Improvements Capital Costs - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: General Fund - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Grants - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 2 Interurban Trail Capital Costs - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Impact Fees - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 3 Fulmer Park Improvements Capital Costs - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: General Fund - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Grants - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 4 Brannan Park Lighting Capital Costs - 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Funding Sources: General Fund - 175,000 - - - - 175,000 5 Misc. Park Improvements Capital Costs - 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 Funding Sources: General Fund - 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non -Capacity Projects - 725,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 1,025,000 Total Costs - 725,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 1,025,000 FUNDING SOURCES: General Fund - 575,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 875,000 Impact Fees - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Grants - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Funding - 725,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 1,025,000 r: l City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PARKS & REC. DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Les Gove Park Improvements Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Irrigation, playground, drinking fountains, ballfield enhancements. General Fund Progress Summary: Master Plan Update in progress. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Increased maintenance of $10,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Grants 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Total 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Total 250,000 - - - - 250,000 81 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PARKS & REC. DEPT. Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Interurban Trail Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: General Fund Description: Trail enhancements to include irrigation and landsaping at major intersections. Five major sites have been identified. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Increased annual maintenance of $5,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund - - - - - - Impact Fees 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Total 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Total 50,000 - - - - 50,000 82 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PARKS & REC. DEPT. Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Fulmer Park Improvements Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Capital Facilities Plan General Fund Description: Develop additional park land exchanged from Water Utility. Increase recreational amenities, including parking facilities. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Increase of parks maintenance by an estimated $10,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Grants 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Total 200,000 - - - - 200,000 83 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PARKS & REC. DEPT. Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Brannan Park - Replacement of Lights Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Capital Facilities Plan General Fund Description: Replacement of field lighting at Brannan Park ball fields. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Total 175,000 - - - - 175,000 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary GENERAL FUND - PARKS & REC. DEPT. Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Misc. Parks Improvements Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Dan Scamporlina Description: Capital Facilities Plan General Fund Minor park improvements including shelters, roofs, playgrounds, irrigation and restrooms as denoted in the Parks Master Plan. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total General Fund - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 General Fund 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Total 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 Total 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 350,000 85 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE PR -3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets PARKS and RECREATION, Including MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Fenster Farm - - - - - - - 2 Jacobsen Tree Farm - - - - - - - 3 Community Center - - - - - - - 4 Game Farm- Soccer Fields 5 Lakeland Hills Park 6 Veteran's Park 7 Auburn Environmental Park 8 Olson Canyon Farm 9 Park Acquisitions 10 Les Gove Park 11 Interurban Trail 12 Fulmer Park Addition 13 Brannan Park Lighting 14 Misc. Park Improvements 10,000 Total - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 rl" City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary POLICE Current Facilities The City of Auburn Police Department provides a full range of law enforcement services, including jail services, to the City of Auburn. Table P-1 Facilities Inventory shows the correctional facilities inventory with the current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 1.14 beds per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 0.8 beds per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any Police capital facilities projects during 2006 — 2011. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for jail facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. 87 TABLE P-1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Police CAPACITY FACILITY (Max. Occupancy) LOCATION Existing Inventory: uburn Correctional Facility Total Existing Inventory Capacity Projects: Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total :: 54 25 West Main St. 54 54 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SENIOR CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently has one Senior Center. Table SC -1 Facilities Inventory lists the facility along with its current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 265 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2005 citywide population of 47,470. The proposed LOS of 172 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2011 projected citywide population of 70,252. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing This CFP does not include any senior center capital facilities projects during 2006 — 2011. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the senior center facility during the six years 2007 — 2012. TABLE SC -1 FACILITY Existing Inventory: Senior Center Total Existing Inventory Proposed Capacity Projects: None Total Proposed Capacity Projects 2011 Projected Inventory Total Facilities Inventory Senior Center :• CAPACITY (Square Feel LOCATION 12,600 808 9th Street SE 12,600 12,600 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SANITARY SEWER Current Facilities The City's sanitary sewer service area encompasses approximately 30 square miles, of which 20 square miles are within the City limits and the remaining 10 square miles are in Auburn's Adjacent Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage treatment and disposal. The City's Sanitary Sewer Utility is responsible for the collection and transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines. The City's current inventory of 180 miles of sewer lines serves the City's sewer service area. Table S-1 Facilities Inventory, lists the sewage collection and transmission facilities along with their capacities and locations. Level of Service (LOS) The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan for the Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City's sewage collection system. These standards represent the average quantities of sewage that the system must accommodate, for residential, industrial, and commercial development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's sewage collection facilities include one capacity project ($7,200,000), which primarily represents expansion of the existing collection system; and four non -capacity projects ($4,906,000), which are primarily system renewals, replacements, and repairs. Total 6 -year costs for the five projects are $12,106,000. Table S-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget revenue impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. til TABLE S-1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Sewage Facilities ACILITY (MGD) LOCATION 'D' Street 0.58 'D' Street NE & Auburn Way N. Dogwood 0.29 Dogwood St. SE 1500 & 15th St. SE Eastpoint 0.30 SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Sec. 05-20-05 (Lakeland Hills) Ellingson 0.72 41 st St. SE, East of 'A' St. SE F' Street 0.86 'F' St. SE & 17th St. SE Peasley Ridge 0.36 S. 320th St. & 53rd Ave. S. Rainier Ridge 0.29 125th Place SE & South of SE 318th Way Rainier Shadows 0.72 124th Ave. SE & SE 306th Place Valley Meadows 0.18 4th St. SE & 'V' St. SE 22nd Street 0.79 22nd St. SE & Riverview Drive 'R' Street 0.14 'R' St. NE & 6th St. NE Riverside 0.58 8th St. NE & 104th Ave. SE 8th Street 0.26 'J' St. NE & 8th St. NE IFACILITY Pipe Size LOCATION (Inverted Syphon 8 & 12 inch Crossing Green River at 26th St. NE 8th Street Bridge Crossing Green River at 8th St. NE 91 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE S-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING SANITARY SEWER DIVISION SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Proiects: 1,146,000 1,135,000 375,000 685,000 1,125,000 440,000 4,906,000 1 AWS Sewer Design & Construction (60% Capacity, 40% Non -Capacity) 7,346,000 2,135,000 375,000 685,000 Capital Costs 6,200,000 1,000,000 - - - - 7,200,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 4,220,000 1,635,000 375,000 685,000 Sewer Fund 3,100,000 500,000 - - - - 3,600,000 Other Utility Funds - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - PWTF - - - - - - - Other (MIT) 3,100,000 500,000 - - - - 3,600,000 Non -Capacity Projects: 440,000 12,106,000 2 Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement Prgm Capital Costs 750,000 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 250,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 750,000 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 250,000 3,000,000 3 Sewer Improvements Capital Costs 117,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 742,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 117,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 742,000 4 SCADA (Telemetry) Upgrades Capital Costs 240,000 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 1,125,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 240,000 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 1,125,000 5 M&O Revisions Capital Costs 39,000 - - - - - 39,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 13,000 - - - - - 13,000 Other Utility Funds 26,000 - - - - - 26,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 6,200,000 1,000,000 - - - - 7,200,000 Non -Capacity Projects 1,146,000 1,135,000 375,000 685,000 1,125,000 440,000 4,906,000 Total Costs 7,346,000 2,135,000 375,000 685,000 1,125,000 440,000 12,106,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Sewer Fund 4,220,000 1,635,000 375,000 685,000 1,125,000 440,000 8,480,000 Other Utility Funds 26,000 - - - - - 26,000 Grants - - - - - - - PWTF - - - - - - - Other (MIT) 3,100,000 500,000 - - - - 3,600,000 Total Funding 7,346,000 2,135,000 375,000 685,000 1,125,000 440,000 12,106,000 92 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: AWS Sewer Design and Construction Project No: C9056 Project Type: Expansion - 60%, Replacement - 40% Project Manager: Jeff Roscoe Description: Design and replace the sanitary sewer transmission facilities located along the Auburn Way So. Corridor. This will benefit the City of Auburn and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. The project is broken out into three distinct segments: 1) Design, 2) Construction, Phase 1 and 3) Construction, Phase 2. Progress Summary: Parametrix has been hired to design the project for Phase 1 construction, to begin in early 2005 with design efforts for all phases to be completed mid -2005. Phase 2 construction shall be broken out as a separate project. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 331,000 1,000,000 3,100,000 4,431,000 PWTF - 2,157,000 - 2,157,000 Utility Funds (Storm, Water) - 18,000 - 18,000 Other (MIT) 80,000 2,000,000 3,100,000 5,180,000 Total Funding Sources: 411,000 5,175,000 6,200,000 11,786,000 Capital Costs: Design 376,000 504,500 - 880,500 Right of Way 35,000 - - 35,000 Construction - 4,670,500 6,200,000 10,870,500 Total Expenditures: 411,000 5,175,000 6,200,000 11,786,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 500,000 - - - 3,600,000 Other (MIT) 500,000 - - - - 3,600,000 Total 1,000,000 - - - - 7,200,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - - - - 7,200,000 Total 1,000,000 - - - - 7,200,000 93 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement Program Project No: C228A Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Jeff Roscoe Description: Repair and replace failing sanitary sewer pipe around the City. This is an annual project that will be broken down into various locations each year. Progress Summary: The City is designing a replacement program for construction in 2005. We will also be looking at the possibility of spot repairs. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 1,350,000 750,000 2,100,000 PWTF - - - - Other - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 1,350,000 750,000 2,100,000 Capital Costs: Design - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 1,250,000 650,000 1,900,000 Total Expenditures: - 1,350,000 750,000 2,100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 250,000 3,000,000 PWTF - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Total 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 250,000 3,000,000 Capital Costs: Design 100,000 50,000 25,000 10,000 100,000 385,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 150,000 200,000 475,000 990,000 150,000 2,615,000 Total 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 250,000 3,000,000 94 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Facility Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Jeff Roscoe Description: Capitalization shall be based upon costs associated with improvements to sewer facilities. Improvements will be primarily directed at pump stations to eliminate odor problems and ensure adequate capacity in the pumps, wet well, and generators. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 65,000 117,000 182,000 PWTF - - - - Other - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 65,000 117,000 182,000 Capital Costs: Design - 10,000 12,000 22,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 55,000 105,000 160,000 Total Expenditures: - 65,000 117,000 182,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 742,000 PWTF - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 742,000 Capital Costs: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 62,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 680,000 Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 742,000 95 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: SCADA (Telemetry) Upgrades Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Gary McConnell Description: The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA, also know as Telemetry system) is in need of upgrading. The existing system, based upon an independent SCADA assessment study, has numerous obsolete components and does not allow control of the sewer utility pump staions. Upgrading portions of the system utilizing antiquated equipment, while maintaining portions that are compatible with newer technologies seems to be the logical course of action. The new system will utilize an open architecture. RFP will be sent in 2006 & construction to begin in 2007. Progress Summary: Design report has been prepared by ECS Engineering, Inc. System design will begin fall of 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 51,000 25,000 240,000 316,000 PWTF - - - - Other - - - - Total Funding Sources: 51,000 25,000 240,000 316,000 Capital Costs: Design 51,000 25,000 240,000 316,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: 51,000 25,000 240,000 316,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 1,125,000 PWTF - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Total 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 1,125,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 240,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 885,000 Total 760,000 - 60,000 - 65,000 1,125,000 •t City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: M&O Revisions Project No: Project Type: Building Remodel Project Manager: Randy Bailey Description: Enterprise Funds Remodel the existing bays at M&O to house vactor trucks for Water, Sewer and Storm utilities. If approved, funds will be transferred to Sewer from Water and Storm. Progress Summary: Project to be initiated and designed in 2005 with construction completed in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The project will lengthen the life of the vactors by keeping vehicles indoors when not in use. No other future budget impacts are anticipated. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Utility Funds (Water) - - 13,000 13,000 Utility Funds (Sewer) - - 13,000 13,000 Utility Funds (Storm) - - 13,000 13,000 Total Funding Sources: - - 39,000 39,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 34,000 34,000 Total Expenditures: - - 39,000 39,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Utility Funds (Water) - - - - - 13,000 Utility Funds (Sewer) - - - - - 13,000 Utility Funds (Storm) - - - - - 13,000 Total - - - - - 39,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - -34,000 Total - - - - - 39,000 97 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary SOLID WASTE Current Facilities The City of Auburn no longer has recycle drop stations facilities. The City now provides curbside service through a vendor who handles the disposal. 10 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE Current Facilities The City's storm drainage service area encompasses the municipal boundaries of the City. For management purposes the service area is divided into sixteen drainage sub -basins. The City's drainage system consists of a combination of closed conveyance pipes and open ditch conveyance facilities, with four pumping stations. Table SD -1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacities and location. Level of Service (LOS) The City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City's storm drainage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25-year/24-hour design storm capacity within the sixteen drainage sub - basins. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's storm drainage facilities include four categories of projects: (1) developer participation capacity projects ($300,000), which primarily represent developer participation projects to support new development; (2) pipelines and surface conveyance projects ($6,550,000); (3) retention, detention, and water quality non - capacity projects ($2,763,000), which primarily represent detention and retention facilities improvements and upgrades; and (4) comprehensive planning ($300,000). Total six-year costs for the four categories of projects are $9,913,000. Table SD -2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table SD -3 shows, operating budget impacts of $6,000 are forecasted for storm drainage facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. AIR TABLE SDA City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities FACILITY (acres) CAPACITY (Feet of (Feet of pipeline) open channels) LOCATION Drainage Sub -Basins: AA 441 6,600 16,000 See City of Auburn's A 497 16,000 Comprehensive Drainage B 836 54,000 Plan, Aug. 2002 C 868 49,000 5,700 for Sub -Basin locations D 176 15,000 500 E 505 25,000 15,000 F 83 8,000 G 126 13,000 H 419 24,000 2,000 HV 63 5,000 1 240 9,000 7,000 K 244 6,000 1,000 L 104 3,000 1,000 O 287 6,000 10,000 P 155 4,000 3,000 V 572 10,000 9,000 W 66 7,000 Z 57 7,000 Total 5,739 267,600 70,200 FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION Pump Stations: 'A' St. SE Pump Station #1 5,300 5000 block'A' St. SE 'A' St. SE Pump Station #2 1,380 'A' St. SE near SR -18 and BNRR overpass Auburn Way S. Pump Station #3 1,000 Aub.Way So. near SR -18 and BNRR overpass Brannan Park Pump Station #4 20,200 Brannan Park 100 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE SD -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING STORM DRAINAGE DIVISION 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Proiects: 1 Developer Participation Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 2 E Basin Ditch Improvements Capital Costs - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 300,000 - - 300,000 3 21st St. SE &'M' St. SE (BC -22 Modified) Capital Costs - - - 75,000 425,000 - 500,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 75,000 425,000 - 500,000 4 Terminal Park Infiltration (BC -24 Modified) Capital Costs - - - - 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - - - 75,000 75,000 5 North Central Storm Pond (GHI-9) Capital Costs - - - - - 275,000 275,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - - - 275,000 275,000 6 Auburn Environmental Park Capital Costs 175,000 175,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 500,000 250,000 4,100,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 175,000 175,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 500,000 250,000 4,100,000 7 17th St. SE &'C' St. SE (BC -8 Modified) Capital Costs 50,000 400,000 250,000 - - - 700,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 50,000 400,000 250,000 - - - 700,000 8 'M' St. SE Storm Improvements Capital Costs 600,000 - - - - - 600,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 600,000 - - - - 600,000 Subtotal, Capacity Proiects: Capital Costs 875,000 625,000 1,800,000 1,925,000 975,000 650,000 6,850,000 101 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Non -Capacity Proiects: 9 Lakeland Hills Subsurface Flow Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 10 Regulatory Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 11 Storm Facility Retrofit Program Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 12 SCADA (Telemetry) Upgrades Capital Costs 73,000 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 413,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 73,000 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 413,000 13 Pipeline Repair/ Replacements Capital Costs 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 Subtotal, Non -Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 473,000 677,000 450,000 505,000 450,000 508,000 3,063,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 875,000 625,000 1,800,000 1,925,000 975,000 650,000 6,850,000 Non -Capacity Projects 473,000 677,000 450,000 505,000 450,000 508,000 3,063,000 Total Costs 1,348,000 1,302,000 2,250,000 2,430,000 1,425,000 1,158,000 9,913,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Storm Fund 1,348,000 1,302,000 2,250,000 2,430,000 1,425,000 1,158,000 9,913,000 Grants - - - - - - - Total Funding 1,348,000 1,302,000 2,250,000 2,430,000 1,425,000 1,158,000 9,913,000 102 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Developer Participation Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Funding set aside for upsizing storm lines being installed by developers. These funds will be expended when developers install storm lines according to City code where larger lines are required as predetermined by the Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Impact cannot be determined until the specific developer projects are identified. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 250,000 - 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 250,000 - 50,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction 250,000 - 50,000 300,000 Total Expenditures: 250,000 - 50,000 300,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 103 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: E Basin Ditch Improvement Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Improvement) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Capacity improvement to the existing downstream ditch serving the "Downtown Area". Project scope to be considered with the Auburn Environmental Park. The E Basin Ditch that is being considered for improvements runs north from 6th St. NW to approximately 20th St. NW to parallel with the interurban trail. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost is estimated to be $2,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 437,000 20,000 - 457,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 437,000 20,000 - 457,000 Capital Costs: Design 50,000 20,000 - 70,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction 387,000 - - 387,000 Total Expenditures: 437,000 20,000 - 457,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 250,000 - - 250,000 Total - - 300,000 - - 300,000 104 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 21st Street SE & W Street SE (BC -22 Modified) Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Construct conveyance improvement to 21st St. SE in -lieu of on-site infiltration on school district property. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 20,000 - 20,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 20,000 - 20,000 Capital Costs: Design - 20,000 - 20,000 Right of Way - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - 20,000 - 20,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 75,000 425,000 500,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - 75,000 425,000 - 500,000 Capital Costs: Design - 75,000 - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 425,000 - 425,000 Total - - 75,000 425,000 - 500,000 105 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Terminal Park Infiltration (BC -24 Modified) Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Capacity improvement to construct infiltration at or near Terminal Park to reduce localized flooding, particularly at Terminal Park Elementary School, and provide relief to downstream drainage system. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 75,000 75,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - 75,000 75,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - 75,000 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total - - - - 75,000 75,000 106 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: North Central Storm Pond (GHI-9) Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Capacity project to provide regional storm water detention at the "Crista Ministries" property. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 275,000 275,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - 275,000 275,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - 275,000 275,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total - - - - 275,000 275,000 107 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Environmental Park Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Storm drainage detention, water quality pump station to serve downtown drainage basin. Project is located on Clay Street. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact at this time. Once the project is complete, impacts will be determined. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 20,000 175,000 195,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 20,000 175,000 195,000 Capital Costs: Design - 20,000 175,000 195,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - 20,000 175,000 195,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 175,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 500,000 250,000 4,100,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 175,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 500,000 250,000 4,100,000 Capital Costs: Design 175,000 250,000 250,000 - - 850,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 1,250,000 1,250,000 500,000 250,000 3,250,000 Total 175,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 500,000 250,000 4,100,000 108 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 17th Street SE & 'C' Street SE (BC -8 Modified) Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Improvement) Project Manager: Unassigned Description: New conveyance improvement within 'C' Street SE from 17th Street SE to the 21st Street SE storm pond. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 50,000 Right of Way - - Construction - - - Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 400,000 250,000 - - - 700,000 Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total 400,000 250,000 - - - 700,000 Capital Costs: Design 75,000 - - - - 125,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 325,000 250,000 - - - 575,000 Total 400,000 250,000 - - - 700,000 109 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 'M' Street SE Storm Improvements Project No: Project Type: Capacity (Improvement) Project Manager: Scott Nutter Description: Storm Utility participation in the oversizing of conveyance in support of Arterial Street project. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 600,000 600,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 600,000 600,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 35,000 35,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 565,000 565,000 Total Expenditures: - - 600,000 600,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - 600,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 600,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 35,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 565,000 Total - - - - - 600,000 110 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lakeland Hills Subsurface Flow Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Improvements to the existing storm drainage system to collect the discharge from two local springs. Currently, the discharge sheet flows over the existing sidewalk. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 40,000 40,000 Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 40,000 Total - - - - - 50,000 111 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Regulatory Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Comprehensive Plan revisions or regulatory responses. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 50,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 112 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Storm Facility Retrofit Program Project No: Various Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Annual program to improve function and aesthetics of two existing storm ponds. Two ponds to be identified for 2006 and the following years. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: For the first couple of years, additional costs will be necessary to establish landscaping. Additional annual costs are estimated at $2,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 125,000 200,000 325,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 125,000 200,000 325,000 Capital Costs: Design - 20,000 50,000 70,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 105,000 150,000 255,000 Total Expenditures: - 125,000 200,000 325,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Capital Costs: Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 113 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: SCADA (Telemetry) Upgrades Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Gary McConnell Enterprise Funds Description: The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA, also know as Telemetry system) is in need of upgrading. The existing system, based upon an independent SCADA assessment study, has numerous obsolete components and does not allow control of the Storm utility stations. Upgrading portions of the system utilizing antiquated equipment, while maintaining portions that are compatible with newer technologies seems to be the logical course of action. The new system will utilize an open architecture. RFP will be sent in 2006 and construction to begin in 2007. Progress Summary: A pre -design report has been prepared by ECS Engineering, Inc. System design will begin fall of 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget _ Budget Amendments _ Adjusted Budget Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 50,000 73,000 123,000 Grants - - - _ Bond Proceeds - Impact Fees - - - _ Total Funding Sources: - 50,000 73,000 123,000 Capital Costs: Design - 50,000 73,000 123,000 Right of Way - - - _ Construction - - - _ Total Expenditures: - 50,000 73,000 123,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 413,000 Grants - - - _ - _ Bond Proceeds Impact Fees - - _ _ _ - Total 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 413,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 73,000 Right of Way - - _ _ _ - Construction 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 340,000 Total 227,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 413,000 114 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pipeline Repair/Replacements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Unassigned Description: Projects identified as those requiring replacement of existing infrastructure. These projects support Local Street and other Utility replacement programs, requiring coordination. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 100,000 100,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 100,000 100,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 90,000 90,000 Total Expenditures: - - 100,000 100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Storm Revenue 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 Capital Costs: Design 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 210,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 890,000 Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 115 TABLE SD -3 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Impact on Future Operating Budgets STORM DRAINAGE Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Developer Participation - - - - - - - 2 E Basin Ditch Improvements - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000 3 21st St SE & M St SE - - - - - - - 4 Terminal Park Infiltration - - - - - - - 5 N. Central Storm Pond - - - - - - - 6 Auburn Environmental Park 7 17th St SE & C St SE - - - - - - - 8 M St. SE - Storm Improvements - - - - - - - 9 Lakeland Hills - Subsurface Flow - - - - - - - 10 Regulatory Improvements - - - - - - - 11 Storm Facility Retrofit Program 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 12 SCADA - - - - - - - 13 Pipeline Repair/Replacement - - - - - - - Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 18,000 116 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TRANSPORTATION Current Facilities Roadways: The City's roadway system consists of a network of limited access freeways and 189 miles of arterial, collector, alleys and local streets. Table T-1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the inventory of state operated and maintained freeways, city arterial road segments, and signalized intersections. Table T-1 also includes the most current volume/capacity ratio and Level of Service (LOS) of each arterial roadway segment and the most current LOS of each signalized and unsignalized intersection. Transit: Metro and Sound Transit provide transit service to the Auburn area. There are currently (2002) eleven routes providing transit linkages in Auburn. Three park and ride facilities, with 1,038 parking spaces, also serve Auburn. Level of Service (LOS) Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires service level standards for both arterials and transit routes. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction's Level of Service (LOS) standards be coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the standards and the methods used are up to the local jurisdictions. Under GMA, the focus is on the performance of the whole road system, not on individual intersections or roadways. Level of service standards is a tool to help keep the transportation system in balance with the needs of future population growth and development. A methodology and set of standards have been drafted for the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The standards help determine concurrency (i.e., balance) between transportation and land use elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as required by GMA. The City has four choices if it finds the standards cannot be met. • Modify the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to minimize traffic. • Construct additional transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new development. • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures. • Relax the LOS standards. The City can accept lower levels of service to encourage further growth and minimize the need for additional transportation facilities. 117 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary The Transportation Land Use Balance will be monitored through the City's Concurrency Management System as part of SEPA. Transportation concurrency will be evaluated for key facilities and on a system -wide basis. By having system- wide and facility -based roadway LOS standards, the City of Auburn can define preliminary capacity needs. The City and WSDOT can then begin to plan corridor studies that will define the characteristics and location of a particular roadway improvement. At the project level, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process will continue to guide the more specific planning and analysis efforts. Uses of Level of Service Standards As measures of transportation system effectiveness, level of service standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding road system. They can assure that all developments are served by a safe, efficient and cost-effective road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions, and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. In July 2001 the City implemented a traffic impact fee. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate traffic impacts more equitably while making the costs of development more predictable to developers. Measuring Transportation System Performance Arterial Corridor Link Level. The level of service for roadway segments or links is analyzed with two primary purposes in mind. First, this site-specific LOS can be used, with the help of a travel demand model, to evaluate areas of congestion within a transportation network --leading to the development of a long-range transportation facilities plan. Traffic forecasts from the model will be analyzed to determine where capacity improvements should be considered. Second, arterial corridor LOS analysis is used to assess concurrency or if facilities are meeting the LOS standards. The City of Auburn uses traditional engineering methodology to assess arterial corridor LOS. Roadway travel volumes are compared to roadway capacity to develop a ratio known as volume -to -capacity (V/C). The volume -to -capacity ratios 118 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary relate directly to measures of level of service. Table T -2A shows the relationships between LOS, V/C ratios, peak hour, and free flow speed on an arterial. Table T -2a V/C Ratio Ranges as they relate to LOS LOS Volume to Capacity (ratio range) Percent of free-flow speed (peak hour) A .50 and below 90% or greater B .60 to .69 70%-90% C .70 to. 79 50 D .80 to .89 40% E .90 to. 99 30% F 1.00 and above 25% or less There are six levels of service on a scale of A to F. LOS A represents the best operating conditions, and LOS F the worst. The characteristics of the six levels of service are summarized in Table T-213. Table T -2b Definition of Arterial Levels of Service (LOS) Level of Service A - describes primarily free flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free flow speed for the arterial class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of Service B - represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed for the arterial class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally subjected to appreciable Level of Service C - represents stable conditions; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in mid block location may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues and/or adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free flow speed for the arterial class. Motorists will experience tension while driving. Level of Service D - borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and, hence, decreases in arterial speed. This may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed. Level of Service E - characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one-third the free flow speed or lower. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. Level of Service F - characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one-third to one-quarter of the free flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with resultant high approach dela s. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 1985, page 11-4 119 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary The LOS scale has been adopted by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the Transportation Research Board, and by most jurisdictions throughout the country. The scale is also accepted and generally understood by the public and elected officials. Level Of Service Standards For Capacity And Congestion. The LOS standards shown in Table T -2C apply to the facility's location and its functional classification. Specific details of the level of service methodology are provided in the City of Auburn Transportation Plan (1997). Table T -2c Draft Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS Standards Roadway/Intersection Maximum V/C Ratio/LOS Arterial Corridor (Capacity) "D" for each arterial link, except for collector residential arterials which are "C" Signalized Intersection "D" Unsi nalized Intersection 'D" Relationship to Concurrency Management. Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's transportation facilities include projects totaling $71,567,250. Table T-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table T-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $268,177 are forecasted for transportation facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. Concurrency (Adequate Public Facilities) In compliance with the GMA, adequate transportation system facilities must be available within six (6) years of the time of occupancy and use of new development. 120 TABLE T-1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Transportation Route Classified Street Segments - Arterials (9/20/02) From To LOS 003rd St NE/NW Auburn Ave C St NW D 003rd St SE A St SE SR18 WB ramps D 004th St SE Auburn Way South F St SE C 004th St SE F St SE M St SE B 008th St NE 009th St NE Harvey Rd D 008th St NE 104th Ave SE R St NE F 008th St NE Harvey Rd Pike St E 008th St NE Pike St R St NE E 009th St NE 008th St NE Auburn Way North B 009th St NE Auburn Way North D St NE B 012th St SE A St SE F St SE C 012th St SE Auburn Way South F St SE E 012th St SE Auburn Way South M St SE D 014th St NW A St NE B St NW C 015th St NE A St NE D St NE C 015th St NE Auburn Way North D St NE E 015th St NW A St NE C St NW C 015th St NW C St NW SR167 NB ramp D 015th St NW R St NW W. Valley Highway B 015th St NW SR167 NB ramp SR167 SB ramp F 015th St NW SR167 SB ramp W. Valley Highway D 015th St SW Boundary Blvd C St SW D 015th St SW Boundary Blvd O St SW D 015th St SW O St SW SR167 NB ramp C 015th St SW SR167 NB ramp SR167 SB ramp D 015th St SW SR167 SB ramp W. Valley Highway F 016th St NW A St NE B St NW B 017th St SE A St SE F St SE D 017th St SE Auburn Way South F St SE C 017th St SE Auburn Way South R St SE F 029th St SE A St SE F St SE C 029th St SE F St SE M St SE B 029th St SE M St SE R St SE D 037th St NE Auburn Way North I St NE D 037th St NW Auburn Way North B St NW E 037th St NW B St NW W. Valley Highway D 041st St SE A St SE C St SW F 047th St SE Lakeland Hills Way Mill Pond Dr B 053rd St S Bridget Ave SE Kersey Way N/A' 055th Ave SE Bridget Ave SE Jordan Ave SE N/A' A St NE 014th St NE 015th St NE C A St NE 015th St NE 016th St NE C 121 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Route Classified Street Segments - Arterials (9/20/02) From To LOS A St SE 002nd St SE 003rd St SE E A St SE 002nd St SE E Main St D A St SE 003rd St SE 006th St SE D A St SE 006th St SE 012th ST SE B A St SE 008th St E City Limits E A St SE 008th St E Lakeland Hills Way E A St SE 012th St SE 017th St SE D A St SE 017th St SE 021st St SE D A St SE 021st St SE 029th St SE D A St SE 029th St SE 037th St SE C A St SE 037th St SE 041st St SE F A St SE 041st St SE Lakeland Hills Way E A St SW 002nd St SW 003rd St SW B A St SW 002nd St SW E Main St C Auburn Ave 001st St NE 003rd St NE E Auburn Ave 001st St NE E Main St F Auburn Ave 003rd St NE 004th St NE F Auburn Ave 004th St NE Auburn Way North E Auburn Black Diamond Rd R St SE City Limits B Auburn Way North 001st St NE Auburn Ave D Auburn Way North 001st St NE E Main St E Auburn Way North 009th St NE 015th St NE D Auburn Way North 009th St NE Auburn Ave C Auburn Way North 015th St NE 022nd St NE C Auburn Way North 022nd St NE 030th St NE/NW D Auburn Way North 030th St NE/NW 037th St NE/NW D Auburn Way North 037th St NE/NW S 277th St D Auburn Way South 002nd St SE 004th St SE D Auburn Way South 002nd St SE E Main St C Auburn Way South 004th St SE SRI WB ramps F Auburn Way South 012th ST SE F St SE E Auburn Way South 012th St SE M St SE F Auburn Way South 032nd St SE Academy Dr F Auburn Way South 032nd St SE Hemlock St SE F Auburn Way South Academy Dr S 368th P1 F Auburn Way South Dogwood St SE Hemlock St SE F Auburn Way South Dogwood St SE Riverwalk Dr F Auburn Way South F St SE SRI EB ramps E Auburn Way South MST SE Riverwalk Dr D Auburn Way South SRI EB ramps SR18 WB ramps F B St NW 014th St NW 015th St NW A B St NW 015th St NW 016th St NW A B St NW 016th St NW 030th St NW A B St NW 030th St NW 037th St NW D B St NW 037th St NW 049th St NW E Boundary Blvd 015th St SW O St SW A Bridget Ave SE 053rd St S 055th Ave SE N/A* 122 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Route Classified Street Segments - Arterials (9/20/02) From To LOS C St NW 003rd St NW 006th St NW C C St NW 003rd St NW W Main St C C St NW 006th St NW 015th St NW C C St NW 015th St NW Emerald Downs Dr D C St SW 015th St SW Ellingson Rd C C St SW 015th St SW SRI EB ramps D C St SW SRI EB ramps SRI WB ramps D C St SW SRI WB ramps W Main St C Cross St A St SE Auburn Way South C D St NE 010th St NE 015th St NE B D St NW S 277th St S 285th St N/A E Main St Auburn Ave Auburn Way NIS E E Main St Auburn Ave Division St E E Main St Auburn Way NIS F St SE C E Main St F St SE M St NESE C E Main St M St NESE R St NESE D Harvey Rd 008th St NE I St NE F Harvey Rd Auburn Way North I St NE F 1 St NE 014th St NE 022nd St NE A 1 St NE 014th St NE Harvey Rd E I St NE 022nd St NE 030th St NE B 1 St NE 030th St NE 031st St NE A 1 St NE 037th St NE 040th St NE A I St NE 037th St NE CAMWEST Dev A Lake Tapps Parkway E East Valley Highway Lakeland Hills Way A Lake Tapps Parkway E Lakeland Hills Way City Limits A Lakeland Hills Way 047th St SE Mill Pond Dr C Lakeland Hills Way 047th St SE Oravetz Rd C Lakeland Hills Way A St SE Oravetz Rd E Lakeland Hills Way Evergreen Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy E C Lakeland Hills Way Evergreen Way SE Mill Pond Dr C M St NE 004th St NE 008th St NE E M St NE 004th St SE E Main St C M St SE 004th St SE 012th St SE D M St SE 004th St SE E Main St D M St SE 012th St SE Auburn Way South F M St SE 021st St SE 029th St SE C M St SE 021st St SE Auburn Way South F O St SW 015th St SW Boundary Blvd C Oravetz Rd Kersey Way Mill Pond Dr C Oravetz Rd Lakeland Hills Way Mill Pond Dr F Peasley Canyon Rd West Valley Highway City Limits F R St SE 017th St SE 021st St SE F R St SE 021st St SE 029th St SE E R St SE 029th St SE Oravetz Rd E R St SE 053rd St S Oravetz Rd B R St SE Auburn Black Diamond Rd E Main St C 123 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Route Classified Street Segments - Arterials (9/20/02) From To LOS Riverwalk Dr Auburn Way South Howard Rd B Riverwalk Dr R St SE C S 277th St Auburn Way North B St NW F S 277th St Auburn Way North City Limits D S 277th St B St NW D St NW D S 277th St D St NW Frontage Rd C S 316th St S 55th Ave W St NW B Terrace Dr R St NW W St NW B W Main St A St NW/SW B St NW/SW D W Main St A St NW/SW Division St E W Main St B St NW/SW C St NW/SW D W Main St C St NW/SW H St NW C W Main St H St NW W. Valley Highway B West Valley Highway 015th St NW 037th St NW C West Valley Highway 015th St NW W Main St B West Valley Highway 015th St SW Ellingson Rd F West Valley Highway 015th St SW Peasley Canyon Rd F West Valley Highway 037th St NW S 287th St F West Valley Highway Peasley Canyon Rd SR18 EB ramps F West Valley Highway SR18 EB ramps SR18 WB ramps F West Valley Highway SR18 WB ramps W Main St F N/A* = not analyzed 124 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Route Classified Street Segments - Collectors (9/20/02) From To LOS 001st St NE Auburn Ave Auburn Way North C 001st St NW Auburn Ave Division St C 001st St NW 8 St NW Division St C 002nd St SE A St SE Auburn Way South D 002nd St SE A St SE Division St F 002nd St SE Auburn Way South F St SE C 002nd St SE F St SE L St SE B 002nd St SW A St SW Division St D 004th St NE Auburn Ave Auburn Way North F 004th St NE Auburn Way North M St NE C 006th St NW C St NW H St NW C 014th St NE I St NE M St NE 8 014th St NE I St NE Riverview Dr A 016th St NE D St NE E St NE 8 021st St SE A St SE F St SE C 021st St SE F St SE M St SE C 021st St SE M St NE R St SE D 022nd St NE Auburn Way North E St NE C 022nd St NE Auburn Way North I St NE D 022nd St NE 1 St NE M St NE B 022nd St NE M St NE Riverview Dr 8 030th St NE Auburn Way North 1 St NE D 030th St NW Auburn Way North 8 St NW C 032nd St SE Academy Dr Auburn Way South E 037th St NW West Valley Highway City Limits F 037th St SE A St SE M St SE N/A 105th PI SE 107th PI SE Lea Hill Rd F 107th P1 SE 105th PI SE SE 320th St C Academy Dr 032nd St SE Auburn Way South C 8 St NW 001st St NW W Main St D D St NE 015th St NE 016th St NE 8 Dogwood St SE Auburn Way South Forest Ridge Dr N/A Dogwood St SE Auburn Way South Scenic Dr N/A E St NE 016th St NE 022nd St NE 8 F St SE 002nd St SE 004th St SE C F St SE 002nd St SE E Main St C F St SE 004th St SE Auburn Way South D F St SE 012th St SE 017th St SE 8 F St SE 017th St SE 021st St SE 8 F St SE 021st St SE 029th St SE C Green River Rd 104th Ave SE City Limits A H St NW 006th St NW W Main St C M St NE 014th St NE 022nd St NE 8 M St SE 029th St SE 037th St SE 8 Mill Pond Dr 047th St SE Lakeland Hills Way 8 125 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Route Classified Street Segments - Collectors (9/20/02) From To LOS Mill Pond Dr 047th St SE Oravetz Rd D Mountain View Dr W Main St City Limits B Pike St 008th St NE 014th St NE N/A R St NE 008th St NE E Main St E Riverview Dr 014th St NE 022nd St NE A SE 320th St 107th PI SE City Limits C SE 304th Way Green River Rd SE 304th St A 126 NIS Street Signalized Intersections (9/20/02) AM EIW Street LOS PM LOS YEAR CONST YEAR COUNT 1 A Street NE 15th Street NE C 1988 2001 2 A Street SE 2nd Street SE C 1979 2001 3 A Street SE 3rd Street SE/ Cross Street C 1968 2001 4 A Street SE 6th Street SE B 1994 2000 5 A Street SE 17th Street SE 1997 1999 6 A Street SE 29th Street SE 1997 1991 7 A Street SE 41st Street SE F 1979 2002 8 Auburn Ave 4th Street NE B 1977 2002 9 Auburn Ave 3rd Street NE B 1977 2002 10 Auburn Ave 1st Street NE B 1971 1999 11 Auburn Ave East Main Street C 1968 2001 12 Auburn Way N S 277th Street D 2002 2000 13 Auburn Way N 37th Street NE C 1984 2000 14 Auburn Way N 30th Street NE D 1985 2000 15 Auburn Way N 22nd Street NE C 1982 2000 16 Auburn Way N 15th Street NE F 1988 2000 17 Auburn Way N 8th Street NE F 1990 2002 18 Auburn Way N 4th Street NE C 1979 2002 19 Auburn Way N 1st Street NE A 1968 1999 20 Auburn Way East Main Street B 1977 2000 21 Auburn Way S Academy Drive B 1991 2002 22 Auburn Way S Dogwood Street C 1987 2002 23 Auburn Way S Riverwalk Drive E 1995 2002 24 Auburn Way S M Street SE E 1992 2002 25 Auburn Way S 12th Street SE C B 1972 2002 26 Auburn Way S 2nd Street SE B 1979 1999 27 Auburn Way S 4th Street NE C 1993 2000 28 C Street NW West Main Street B 2002 2001 29 C Street NW 15th Street NW C 1995 2001 30 C Street NW 3rd Street NW B ? 2002 126 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 127 N/S Street Signalized Intersections (9/20/02) AM E/W Street LOS PM LOS YEAR CONST YEAR COUNT 31 C Street SW 15th Street SW B 1975 2001 32 C Street SW Boeing Gate A-10 A 1979 N/A 33 C Street SW Ellingson Road F 1991 2002 34 D Street NE 15th Street NE B 1985 2001 35 D Street NW S 277th Street B 2002 N/A 36 Division Street West Main Street B 1968 2001 37 Harvey Road NE 8th Street NE F 1988 2000 38 Harvey Road NE I Street NE B 1988 1999 39 Industry Road 15th Street SW B 1994 2001 40 O Street SW 15th Street SW B 1994 2000 41 Market Street 15th Street SW B 1994 1999 42 Perimeter Road SW 15th Street SW A ? 1999 43 M Street NE 4th Street NE B 1978 1999 44 M Street SE East Main Street D C 1977 2002 45 M Street SE 4th Street SE C 1978 2002 46 Auburn Way S Pedestrian Signal (N. of 12th St. SE) ? N/A 47 A Street SW West Main Street 2000 N/A 48 A Street SW 2nd Street SW 2001 N/A 49 D Street NE 10th Street NE/ 9th Street NE 1999 2000 50 D Street NE Firestation ? N/A 51 C Street SW 8th Street SW 1998 1999 52 West Valley Highway 37th Street NW C 1995 2001 53 West Valley Highway 15th Street NW D 1988 2001 54 West Valley Highway West Main Street B 1968 2001 55 West Valley Highway 15th Street SW B 1994 2001 56 B Street NW S 277th Street 2002 2000 57 B Street NW 37th Street NW 1995 1999 58 Emerald Downs Drive 37th Street NW 1996 N/A 59 Division Street 3rd Street S 2002 N/A 60 R Street SE 29th Street SE/ Riverwalk 1998 1999 61 R Street SE 31st Street SE (Pedestrian Signal) ? N/A 62 R Street SE Firestation 1985 N/A 127 TABLE T-2 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION 128 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total TIP# Capacity Projects: 1 3rd St SE / Cross St SE (C1006) Capital Costs 148,000 148,000 Funding Sources: Impact Fees 148,000 148,000 2 'A' Street Loop (PR529F) Capital Costs 145,000 145,000 Funding Sources: Grants 78,500 - 78,500 Impact Fees 66,500 - - 66,500 5 'A' Street NW, Phase 1 (C207A) Capital Costs 1,758,000 2,717,500 2,320,500 - 6,796,000 Funding Sources: Grants 1,225,700 1,952,500 1,952,500 - 5,130,700 Impact Fees 82,300 368,000 368,000 818,300 Other* 450,000 397,000 - - 847,000 6 Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Capital Costs 1,600,000 - 1,600,000 Funding Sources: Grants 800,000 - - 800,000 Muckleshoot Tribe 800,000 - - 800,000 8 '1' Street NE Corridor Capital Costs 10,000 460,000 1,020,000 4,280,000 - 5,770,000 Funding Sources: Impact Fees 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Other* - 460,000 1,020,000 4,280,000 5,760,000 9 'M' Street Grade Separation (C201 A) Capital Costs 20,000 295,000 5,000,000 7,928,600 7,000,000 4,472,000 24,715,600 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - - - - 490,000 - 490,000 Grants - 240,000 4,200,000 7,362,600 4,070,000 15,872,600 Impact Fees 20,000 55,000 100,000 100,000 - 275,000 Other* - - 700,000 466,000 2,440,000 4,472,000 8,078,000 10 South 277th -AWN to Green River Bridge (C222A) Capital Costs 5,000 - 300,000 325,000 300,000 2,130,900 3,060,900 Funding Sources: Grants - - 100,000 100,000 200,000 1,843,200 2,243,200 Developer Contrib. - - 200,000 200,000 100,000 250,000 750,000 Impact Fees 5,000 - - 25,000 - 37,700 67,700 12 'A' Street NW, Phase 2 Capital Costs - 200,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 2,650,000 Funding Sources: Grants - 1,038,000 - 1,038,000 Bond Proceeds - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 Impact Fees 200,000 162,000 - 362,000 128 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 129 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total TIP# Capacity Projects: 14 'D' Street NW, 37th to 44th Capital Costs 200,000 1,500,000 1,100,000 2,800,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - 300,000 220,000 520,000 Grants 160,000 1,200,000 880,000 2,240,000 Impact Fees - - 40,000 - - 40,000 15 'F' Street SE, 4th to AWS Capital Costs 200,000 650,000 1,000,000 1,850,000 Funding Sources: Grants 160,000 520,000 800,000 1,480,000 Impact Fees 40,000 130,000 200,000 370,000 16 'M' Street NE, E. Main to 8th Capital Costs - - 166,000 805,000 1,000,000 1,971,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - - - - Grants 132,800 644,000 800,000 1,576,800 Impact Fees - 33,200 161,000 200,000 394,200 17 Realign SR -18 EB Ramp at AWS Capital Costs - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Other* - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 18 Harvey & 8th St NE, Intersection Improv. Capital Costs 160,000 350,000 - 510,000 Funding Sources: Impact Fees 160,000 350,000 510,000 Other* - - - 19 Auburn/ Pacific Trail -'C' St SW Capital Costs 355,900 - - - 355,900 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 26,600 - - - 26,600 Grants 307,300 - - - 307,300 City of Pacific 22,000 - - - 22,000 25 Green River Trail, Phase 1 Capital Costs - - 125,000 495,000 620,000 Funding Sources: Grants - 125,000 495,000 - - 620,000 26 Green River Trail, Phase 2 Capital Costs - - 150,000 480,000 630,000 Funding Sources: Grants - 120,000 330,000 450,000 Other* - 30,000 150,000 180,000 27 Green River Trail, Phase 3 Capital Costs - 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources: Bond Proceeds 30,000 30,000 Other* - - - - - - - Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 4,201,900 4,022,500 9,415,500 14,594,600 10,955,000 11,462,900 54,652,400 129 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total TIP# Non -Capacity Projects: 3 Auburn Way So. Safety Improvements (C1014) Capital Costs 499,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 499,000 4 Urban Area Transp. System Mgmt. Improv. Capital Costs 454,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 5,000 Grants 376,700 King County 72,300 7 Auburn Way Corridor, Pedestrian Crossing (C409A) Capital Costs Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - Grants - - 11 15th St SW Reconstruction Capital Costs 450,000 2,250,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 90,000 450,000 Grants - 360,000 1,800,000 11A 15th St SW Preservation Capital Costs 175,000 - - Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 175,000 13 'C' Street NW -W. Main to 3rd Capital Costs 530,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 30,000 REET 500,000 20 West Main Street Streetscape (C322A) Capital Costs 741,200 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 100,100 Grants 641,100 - - - 21 BNSF / E. Valley Hwy. Pedestrian Underpass (C229A) Capital Costs 110,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Grants 110,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 Other` - 300,000 200,000 22 'A' Street SE Pedestrian Improvements Capital Costs - 193,000 - Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - 43,000 Grants - 150,000 130 499,000 499,000 454,000 5,000 376,700 72,300 376,000 2,402,300 2,778,300 50,800 324,300 375,100 325,200 2,078,000 2,403,200 - - 2,700,000 540,000 2,160,000 175,000 175,000 530,000 30,000 500,000 741,200 100,100 641,100 2,810,000 2,310,000 500,000 193,000 43,000 150,000 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 131 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total TIP# Non -Capacity Projects: 23 White River Trail Extension Capital Costs 201,400 201,400 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 27,200 27,200 Grants - 174,200 174,200 24 37th Street SE /'R' Street Connector Capital Costs 63,000 - 63,000 Funding Sources: Grants 50,400 50,400 Other* 12,600 - - - 12,600 28 Academy Drive Multi -Use Trail Capital Costs - 150,000 425,000 425,000 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 15,000 42,500 42,500 100,000 Grants 135,000 382,500 382,500 900,000 Other* - - - - - 29 'A' Street SE, Non -Motorized Trail Capital Costs 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund - 75,000 75,000 32 Pavement Condition Rating Update Capital Costs 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 33 So. 277th, Wetland Mitigation (C410A) Capital Costs 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 34 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 35 Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure Improv. Capital Costs 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Funding Sources: Arterial Street Fund 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 36 Annual Arterial Pavement Preservation Capital Costs - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Funding Sources: REET 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 131 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total SUMMARY: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total TIP# Non -Capacity Projects: Capacity Projects 4,201,900 37 Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program 14,594,600 10,955,000 11,462,900 54,652,400 Non -Capacity Projects 4,569.200 2,075.000 4.546,000 Capital Costs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 20,961,000 Funding Sources: 15,035,200 79,447,300 FUNDING SOURCES: Arterial Street Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 38 'M' Street SE, 37th to 29th Local Street Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Capital Costs 725,000 - - - - - 725,000 Bond Proceeds Funding Sources: - - - - 1,280,000 1,280,000 REET 1,365,000 Arterial Street Fund - 670,000 670,000 - - Levy Lid Lift - 900,000 Grants 400,000 1,800,000 - 5,669,400 Prop. Tax, New Constr. 230,600 400,000 - REET 325,000 - - - - - 325,000 39 Local Street Improvement Program - (Local Street Fund - 103) 72,300 City of Pacific 22,000 - - - Capital Costs 1,200,000 1,220,000 1,520,000 1,820,000 2,120,000 - 7,880,000 100,000 Funding Sources: 750,000 Muckleshoot Tribe 800,000 - - - - - Local Street Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 3,811,700 Levy Lid Lift 269,400 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 - 5,669,400 Total Funding Prop. Tax, New Constr. 230,600 - - - - - 230,600 agencies, other funds REET 540,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 - 1,220,000 Utility Impact Funds 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 750,000 Subtotal, Non -Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 4,569,200 2,075,000 4,546,000 6,366,400 3,666,000 3,572,300 24,794,900 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 4,201,900 4,022,500 9,415,500 14,594,600 10,955,000 11,462,900 54,652,400 Non -Capacity Projects 4,569.200 2,075.000 4.546,000 6,366,400 3666,000 3,572,300 24,794,900 Total Costs 8,771,100 6,097,500 13,961,500 20,961,000 14,621,000 15,035,200 79,447,300 FUNDING SOURCES: Arterial Street Fund 1,080,700 245,000 453,000 737,200 1,128,300 831,800 4,476,000 Local Street Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grants 3,829,300 2,462,500 8,657,900 12,159,600 7,979,700 6,313,700 41,402,700 Bond Proceeds - - - - - 1,280,000 1,280,000 REET 1,365,000 670,000 670,000 670,000 670,000 500,000 4,545,000 Levy Lid Lift 269,400 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 - 5,669,400 Prop. Tax, New Constr. 230,600 - - - - 230,600 King County 72,300 - - - 72,300 City of Pacific 22,000 - - - - - 22,000 Developer Contributions - - 200,000 200,000 100,000 250,000 750,000 Muckleshoot Tribe 800,000 - - - - - 800,000 Impact Fees 641,800 963,000 748,000 748,200 473,000 237,700 3,811,700 Other' 450,000 857,000 2,032,600 4,946,000 2,470,000 5,622,000 16,377,600 Total Funding 8,771,100 6,097,500 13,961,500 20,961,000 1456215000 15,035,200 795447,300 Mitigation agreements, other agencies, other funds 132 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 3rd Street SE / Cross Street SE TIP #1 Project No: C1006 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak Description: Widen 3rd Street SE/Cross Street from 3 to 5 lanes at'A' Street to Auburn Way South. Add a second left turn lane from northbound 'A' Street SE to westbound 3rd Street SE. The project includes signal modifications. Install a 12 inch ductile iron water pipe from 'A' Street SE to Auburn Way So. The project is a continuation of the corridor enhanced by the 3rd St. SW Grade Separation project. It will improve mobility and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Progress Summary: Design is completed. Property acquisition is being completed in 2005. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2005, but will likely carryover into 2006 due to signal equipment procurement. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,757. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 41,045 159,536 - 200,581 Grants 162,159 1,173,841 - 1,336,000 REET 9,419 - - 9,419 Impact Fees - 216,000 148,000 364,000 Total Funding Sources: 212,623 1,549,377 148,000 1,910,000 Capital Costs: Design 166,129 18,000 - 184,129 Right of Way 46,494 530,000 - 576,494 Construction - 1,001,377 148,000 1,149,377 Total Expenditures: 212,623 1,549,377 148,000 1,910,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - REET - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - 148,000 Total - - - - - 148,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 148,000 Total - - - - - 148,000 133 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: 'A' Street Loop PR529F Capacity Jennifer Dvorak TIP #2 Description: This project is the final phase of the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation Project. It will construct a new asphalt road connecting A Street SW and Division Street and thereby provide multiple access routes into the Auburn Station Garage. Landscape strips, sidewalks, driveways, lighting and storm drainage will be included. Progress Summary: Design and Right of Way are being completed in 2005. Construction scheduled for 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $851. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 17,403 100,742 - 118,145 Grants 16,100 205,258 78,500 299,858 Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - 66,500 66,500 Total Funding Sources: 33,503 306,000 145,000 484,503 Capital Costs: Design 33,503 6,000 - 39,503 Right of Way - 10,000 - 10,000 Construction - 290,000 145,000 435,000 Total Expenditures: 33,503 306,000 145,000 484,503 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - - - 78,500 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - 66,500 Total - - - - - 145,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 145,000 Total - - - - - 145,000 134 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'A' Street NW, Phase 1 - 3rd St. to 14th St. NE Project No: C207A Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Bill Helbig TIP #5 Description: Construct a multi lane arterial from 3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan and contributes to the completion of a North-South arterial corridor. Progress Summary: The predesign (30% design) has been completed. A portion of the right-of-way has been acquired. Full design should begin in 2005. Mohawk plastics has completed the construction of a 2 -block stretch of the road adjacent to their property. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $17,568. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 260,484 33,750 - 294,234 Grants - 216,250 1,225,700 1,441,950 Other 381,000 - 450,000 831,000 Impact Fees 39,149 10,000 82,300 131,449 Total Funding Sources: 680,633 260,000 1,758,000 2,698,633 Capital Costs: Design 47,829 250,000 323,000 620,829 Right of Way 251,804 10,000 1,435,000 1,696,804 Construction 381,000 - - 381,000 Total Expenditures: 680,633 260,000 1,758,000 2,698,633 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants 1,952,500 1,952,500 - - 5,130,700 Other 397,000 - - - 847,000 Impact Fees 368,000 368,000 - - 818,300 Total 2,717,500 2,320,500 - - - 6,796,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 323,000 Right of Way - - - 1,435,000 Construction 2,717,500 2,320,500 - - - 5,038,000 Total 2,717,500 2,320,500 - - - 6,796,000 135 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Citywide Intelligent Transportation System TIP #6 Project No: C307A Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Ryan Johnstone Description: This project includes interconnect and coordination for all signals in the City. The project also includes traffic management cameras, fiber optic interconnect and related hardware along SR -164 (Auburn Way So) and S. 277th Street corridors. The project will construct a traffic control center at the existing M&O facility. This project is required for special event traffic management and incident response. Progress Summary: Phase 1, which includes Auburn Way So. Has been completed. Phase 2, S. 277th, will be completed in 2006. We are expecting a Public Works Trust Fund Loan in the amount of $800,000 to provide the necessary match for the Federal ITS Grant. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 11,446 55,535 66,981 Grants - 863,981 - 863,981 PWTFL - - 800,000 800,000 King County - 500,000 - 500,000 Other (MIT) - 300,000 800,000 1,100,000 Total Funding Sources: 11,446 1,719,516 1,600,000 3,330,962 Capital Costs: Design 11,446 300,000 200,000 511,446 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 1,419,516 1,400,000 2,819,516 Total Expenditures: 11,446 1,719,516 1,600,000 3,330,962 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - PWTFL - - - 800,000 King County - - - - Other (MIT) - 800,000 Total - - - - - 1,600,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 200,000 Right of Way - - Construction - - - 1,400,000 Total - - - - 1,600,000 136 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: 'I' Street NE Corridor Project No: C415A Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Scott Nutter Special Revenue Funds TIP #8 Description: The final alignment of the T Street Corridor is being analyzed as part of the Northeast Auburn Special Area Plan Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW and Construction may be developer funded. The cross section will likely be a 5 -lane arterial per the City Comprehensive Plan. It will improve mobility and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It will complete a major north south arterial from 52nd St NE to Harvey Rd. Future sewer line proposed to be a combination 10 in. & 30 in. line. Progress Summary: It is anticipated that a pre -design report will be completed in 2005. Additional coordination/detailed design in partnership with developers may be required in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $17,868. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,000 40,000 - 45,000 Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - 10,000 10,000 Total Funding Sources: 5,000 40,000 10,000 55,000 Capital Costs: Design 5,000 40,000 10,000 55,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: 5,000 40,000 10,000 55,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants - - - - - - Other 460,000 1,020,000 4,280,000 - - 5,760,000 Impact Fees - - - - - 10,000 Total 460,000 1,020,000 4,280,000 - - 5,770,000 Capital Costs: Design 460,000 - - - - 470,000 Right of Way - 1,020,000 - - - 1,020,000 Construction - - 4,280,000 - - 4,280,000 Total 460,000 1,020,000 4,280,000 - - 5,770,000 137 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'M' Street Grade Separation - E. Main to AWS TIP #9 Project No: C201A Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Ingrid Gaub Description: Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing at M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Tracks. Project also includes construction of the bypass and road connection between M Street SE and Auburn Black Diamond Road. 2006 will focus on developing partnership agreements and applying for grants/ PWTFL. Progress Summary: The pre -design report has been completed. We are searching for grant funding. FAST has committed design money when they get it. This project will score well in TIB's AIP program once it reaches construction, but not before. A Public Works Trust Fund Loan for $1.17m is anticipated in 2008/2009. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $21,827. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees 245,000 5,000 20,000 270,000 Total Funding Sources: 245,000 5,000 20,000 270,000 Capital Costs: Design 245,000 5,000 20,000 270,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: 245,000 5,000 20,000 270,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 490,000 - 490,000 Grants 240,000 4,200,000 7,362,600 4,070,000 - 15,872,600 Other - 700,000 466,000 2,440,000 4,472,000 8,078,000 Impact Fees 55,000 100,000 100,000 - - 275,000 Total 295,000 5,000,000 7,928,600 7,000,000 4,472,000 24,715,600 Capital Costs: Design 295,000 1,000,000 112,600 - - 1,427,600 Right of Way - 4,000,000 4,516,000 - - 8,516,000 Construction - - 3,300,000 7,000,000 4,472,000 14,772,000 Total 295,000 5,000,000 7,928,600 7,000,000 4,472,000 24,715,600 138 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: South 277th (AWN to Green River Bridge) TIP #10 Project No: C222A Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Scott Nutter Description: This project includes major widening including the addition of three lanes, one in westbound and one eastbound and a Class 1 trail. Water CFP shows a low priority project in the vicinity which may be accomodated by a developer. (Water CFP Proj DS -603-108,109 and Proj DS -601-109,110) Progress Summary: The NE Auburn area is currently undergoing an Environmental Impact Statement that includes the impacts of future development in the vicinity of this project. 2005 monies are to coordinate with potential developers and to assist in seeking of grant funding for the project. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $10,541. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 5,000 - 5,000 Grants - - - Developer Contrib. - - - - Impact Fees 4,091 - 5,000 9,091 Total Funding Sources: 4,091 5,000 5,000 14,091 Capital Costs: Design 4,091 5,000 5,000 14,091 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: 4,091 5,000 5,000 14,091 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - 100,000 100,000 200,000 1,843,200 2,243,200 Developer Contrib. - 200,000 200,000 100,000 250,000 750,000 Impact Fees - - 25,000 - 37,700 67,700 Total - 300,000 325,000 300,000 2,130,900 3,060,900 Capital Costs: Design - 125,000 125,000 - - 255,000 Right of Way - 175,000 200,000 300,000 - 675,000 Construction - - - 2,130,900 2,130,900 Total - 300,000 325,000 300,000 2,130,900 3,060,900 139 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: 'A' Street NW, Phase 2 (W. Main St. to 3rd St. NW) Capacity TBD TIP #12 Description: Construct a multi lane arterial. This project will connect A Street NW Phase 1 to the Sound Transit Station and the Central Business District. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,405. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants - - 1,038,000 - 1,038,000 Bond Proceeds - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 Impact Fees - - 200,000 162,000 - 362,000 Total - - 200,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 2,650,000 Capital Costs: Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 Construction - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 Total - - 200,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 2,650,000 140 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: V Street NW (37th St. NW to 44th St. NW) Project No: Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: TBD TIP #14 Description: Construct a four lane arterial per the city Comprehensive Plan. It will improve mobility north/south. This project is tied to a pending development. It will complete a major north/south arterial from Ellingson to S. 277th Street. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $14,054. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 300,000 220,000 520,000 Grants - - 160,000 1,200,000 880,000 2,240,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - 40,000 - - 40,000 Total - - 200,000 1,500,000 1,100,000 2,800,000 Capital Costs: Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Construction - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 Total - - 200,000 1,500,000 1,100,000 2,800,000 141 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'F' Street SE (4th St. SE to AWS) TIP #15 Project No: Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: Widen 'F' Street SE to 3 lanes, with parking allowed on both sides, to increase the roadway capacity. Install curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and bike lanes as well as crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge. The project may include a traffic signal at F Street SE and 4th Street SE. This project improves mobility and safety. This project also provides arterial relief for the 'M' Street SE Grade Separation Project. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $851. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants 160,000 520,000 800,000 - - 1,480,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees 40,000 130,000 200,000 - 370,000 Total 200,000 650,000 1,000,000 - - 1,850,000 Capital Costs: Design 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Right of Way - 250,000 - - - 250,000 Construction - 400,000 1,000,000 - - 1,400,000 Total 200,000 650,000 1,000,000 - - 1,850,000 142 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'M' Street NE (E. Main St. to 8th St. NE) TIP #16 Project No: Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: Widen roadway to 4 lanes. Construct curb gutter and sidewalk. Modify existing signals. This project will improve safety, capacity and mobility. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $3,514. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants - 132,800 644,000 800,000 1,576,800 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - 33,200 161,000 200,000 394,200 Total - - 166,000 805,000 1,000,000 1,971,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 166,000 - - 166,000 Right of Way - - - 480,000 - 480,000 Construction - - - 325,000 1,000,000 1,325,000 Total - - 166,000 805,000 1,000,000 1,971,000 143 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Realign SR -18 EB Ramp at AWS Project No: Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: TBD TIP #17 Description: Realign the SR18 eastbound ramp, build grade separation of main north south line and Stampede Pass line, and connect to 6th Street SE. Widen 6th Street SE roadway from 2 to 4 lanes including signal modifications at "A" Street and Auburn Way South. This project improves traffic flow significantly due to the potential development of the BNSF yard to an intermodal freight facility. Replace a small portion of sewer line along 6th Street SE. Progress Summary: An alternative to this project may be a grade separation at 15th Street SW/SE connecting 'A' Street SE to 'C' Street SW across the BNSF railyard. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Not scheduled for completion until after 2010. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - Other - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 144 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Harvey & 8th St. NE, Intersection Improvements Capacity TBD TIP #18 Description: Add an EB combined through and right turn lane on 8th Street NE approaching Harvey Road. Modify traffic signals and traffic channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane (additional capacity) will improve traffic delays and vehicle queuing at the intersection of Harvey Road and 8th Street NE in all directions. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $703. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - 160,000 160,000 Total Funding Sources: - - 160,000 160,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 60,000 60,000 Right of Way - - 100,000 100,000 Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - 160,000 160,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Impact Fees 350,000 - - - - 510,000 Total 350,000 - - - - 510,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - 100,000 Construction 350,000 - - - - 350,000 Total 350,000 - - - - 510,000 145 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Auburn/Pacific Trail ('C' Street SW) Project No: Project Type: Class 1 Trail Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak TIP #19 Description: This project will construct a Class 1 meandering trail between the cities of Auburn and Pacific along the west side of C Street SW (Auburn) and Skinner Road (Pacific). It will start in Auburn at 15"' Street SW and end at the southern terminus of Skinner Road. Striping will be installed along 3`d Avenue SE in Pacific to connect a bike lane from where the trail ends at Skinner Road to the southern end of the Interurban Trail. The Class 1 trail will be approximately 2.05 miles and the striping portion will be 1.42 miles. Progress Summary: This project is fully funded with STP funds; it will be under construction in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,688. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 5,400 26,600 32,000 Grants - 34,600 307,300 341,900 City of Pacific - - 22,000 22,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 40,000 355,900 395,900 Capital Costs: Design - 40,000 39,200 79,200 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 316,700 316,700 Total Expenditures: - 40,000 355,900 395,900 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 26,600 Grants - - - - - 307,300 City of Pacific - - - - - 22,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 355,900 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 39,200 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - 316,700 Total - - - - - 355,900 146 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Green River Trail, Phase 1 TIP #25 Project No: Project Type: Non -Motorized Trail Project Manager: TBD Description: Design and construct a Class 1 Non -Motorized Trail from Green River Beach Access to Brannan Park. Coordinate with Auburn Parks Department and King County Parks. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,856. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - 125,000 495,000 - - 620,000 Other - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - 125,000 495,000 - - 620,000 Capital Costs: Design - 125,000 100,000 - - 225,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 395,000 - - 395,000 Total - 125,000 495,000 - - 620,000 147 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Green River Trail, Phase 2 TIP #26 Project No: Project Type: Non -Motorized Trail Project Manager: TBD Description: Design and construct a Class 1 Non -Motorized Trail from Brannan Park to 4th Street SE. Coordinate with Auburn Parks Department and King County Parks. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Not scheduled for completion until after 2010. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - 120,000 330,000 450,000 Other - - - 30,000 150,000 180,000 Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - 150,000 480,000 630,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - 150,000 - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 480,000 480,000 Total - - - 150,000 480,000 630,000 148 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Green River Trail, Phase 3 Project No: Project Type: Non -Motorized Trail Project Manager: TBD Special Revenue Funds TIP #27 Description: Design and construct a Class 1 Non -Motorized Trail from 4th Street SE to SR 18. Coordinate with Auburn Parks Department and King County Parks. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: Not scheduled for completion until after 2010. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - Bond Proceeds - - - Impact Fees - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - Right of Way - - - Construction - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - 30,000 30,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total - - - - 30,000 30,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total - - - - 30,000 30,000 149 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South Safety Improvements Project No: C1014 Project Type: Non -Capacity (Safety) Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak TIP #3 Description: This project was created in response to a State safety study. The project includes safety improvements along Auburn Way South (AWS) between 6th Street SE and M Street SE. The anticipated improvements include rechannelization of AWS to limit left turns, a new traffic signal at the intersection of Auburn Way South and 'F' Street SE signal interconnection, and widening for an additional lane between D Street SE and 6th Street SE. This project will significantly improve the safety of the corridor. Progress Summary: Construction is beginning summer 2005. It is expected that construction will carryover into 2006 due to delays related to the Les Schwab access and signal equipment procurement. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No impact; the State maintains the pavement on SR -164. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 101,443 553,579 499,000 1,154,022 Grants 223,333 608,253 - 831,586 Developer Contrib. 98,000 - - 98,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 422,776 1,161,832 499,000 2,083,608 Capital Costs: Design 400,894 15,832 - 416,726 Right of Way 21,882 6,000 - 27,882 Construction - 1,140,000 499,000 1,639,000 Total Expenditures: 422,776 1,161,832 499,000 2,083,608 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 499,000 Grants - - - - - - Developer Contrib. - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 499,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 499,000 Total - - - - - 499,000 150 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Urban Area Transportation System Mgmt. Improv. Non -Capacity Scott Nutter TIP #4 Description: This project will modify four intersections to improve bus turning radii and will reconstruct 2nd Street SW between A Street SW and A Street SE. Progress Summary: Design is expected to be completed iin 2005. Right of way procurement and construction will take place in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 5,000 Grants - 177,585 376,700 554,285 KC Metro - 27,715 72,300 100,015 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 205,300 454,000 659,300 Capital Costs: Design - 205,300 - 205,300 Right of Way - - 50,300 50,300 Construction - - 403,700 403,700 Total Expenditures: - 205,300 454,000 659,300 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 5,000 Grants - - - - - 376,700 KC Metro - - - - - 72,300 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 454,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - 50,300 Construction - - - - - 403,700 Total - - - - - 454,000 151 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Auburn Way Corridor - Pedestrian Crossing TIP #7 Project No: C409A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak Description: This project is to improve the pedestrian accessability, the appearance, and the tie to the downtown along Auburn Way South between 4th Street NE and 4th Street SE. Progress Summary: The predesign report has been completed. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - Other - - - - impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,800 324,300 375,100 Grants - - 325,200 2,078,000 2,403,200 Other - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - 376,000 2,402,300 2,778,300 Capital Costs: Design - - - 167,000 - 167,000 Right of Way - - - 209,000 - 209,000 Construction - - - - 2,402,300 2,402,300 Total - - - 376,000 2,402,300 2,778,300 152 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP #11 Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (access mgmt / pavement preservation) Project Manager: TBD Description: Rehabilitate 15th Street SW between 'C' Street SW and the Union Pacific Railroad. The project will also construct landscaped medians which will continue the access management treatment that is currently West of the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - Grants - - - PWTF - - - - Impact Fees - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - 90,000 450,000 - - 540,000 Grants - 360,000 1,800,000 - - 2,160,000 PWTF - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - 450,000 2,250,000 - - 2,700,000 Capital Costs: Design 450,000 - - - 450,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 2,250,000 - - 2,250,000 Total - 450,000 2,250,000 - - 2,700,000 153 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 15th Street SW Preservation TIP #11A Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (temporary pavement repairs) Project Manager: TBD Description: The North 1/2 of 15th Street SW is 100% alligator cracked in the wheel paths. This is a potential route for a new King County Metro Sewer line which would necessitate the reconstruction of the failed roadway sections. A temporary fix is scheduled to hold the road together for mobility and safety. This includes some patch work followed by a double chip seal. This type of work is expected to hold the roadway together for approximately 4 to 6 years. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 175,000 175,000 Grants - - - PWTF - - - Impact Fees - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 175,000 175,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 165,000 165,000 Total Expenditures: - - 175,000 175,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 175,000 Grants - - - - - - PWTF - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 175,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 165,000 Total - - - - - 175,000 154 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'C' Street NW (W. Main St. to 3rd St. NW) TIP #13 Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD Description: Restore/ Reconstruct existing pavement. Remove RR tracks no longer used. Widen roadway to 5 lanes with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Transition to 4 lanes north of 3rd St. NW. Reconstruct 3rd St. NW east to the BNSF railroad tracks and west to'D' St. NW. Make signal modifications at'C' Street/Main Street and at'C' Street/3rd St. NW. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 30,000 30,000 Grants - - - - REET - - 500,000 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 530,000 530,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 500,000 500,000 Total Expenditures: - - 530,000 530,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 30,000 Grants - - - - - - REET - - - - - 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Tota/ - - - - - 530,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 500,000 Total - - - - - 530,000 155 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: West Main Street Streetscape Project No: C322A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Scott Nutter Special Revenue Funds TIP #20 Description: Develop bike lanes and restore sidewalk to link the Interurban Trail to Downtown Auburn and the Sound Transit Center. Progress Summary: Federal STP Funds are being obligated prior to January 1, 2005. Public involvement will be completed in 2005; design is scheduled for 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 129 9,300 100,100 109,529 Grants 826 59,700 641,100 701,626 Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 955 69,000 741,200 811,155 Capital Costs: Design 955 69,000 - 69,955 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 741,200 741,200 Total Expenditures: 955 69,000 741,200 811,155 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 100,100 Grants - - - - - 641,100 Other - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - - - - 741,200 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 741,200 Total - - - - - 741,200 156 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass TIP #21 Project No: C229A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak Description: This project will construct an undercrossing of the BNSF Railroad in conjuction with a pedestrian bridge to allow a direct, attractive non -motorized access between neighborhoods in the City of Pacific and schools in the City of Auburn. Progress Summary: The project pre -design (30% design) is being completed in 2005. The current grant source is to supplement the design of the project only. Additional design dollars are needed along with construction and right-of-way. The City is applying for grant resources. The City is also anticipating $150,000 in Federal High Speed Rail Money (Sec. 1103C). Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $420. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 3,817 - - 3,817 Grants 75,206 224,794 300,000 KC Open Space Bond 36,944 3,056 - 40,000 Other - - - - Total Funding Sources: 115,967 227,850 - 343,817 Capital Costs: Design 115,967 227,850 - 343,817 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: 115,967 227,850 - 343,817 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants 110,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 - - 2,310,000 KC Open Space Bond - - - - - - Other - 300,000 200,000 - 500,000 Total 110,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 - - 2,810,000 Capital Costs: Design 60,000 - - - - 60,000 Right of Way 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Construction - 1,500,000 1,200,000 - - 2,700,000 Total 110,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 - - 2,810,000 157 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'A' Street SE Pedestrian Improvements Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD TIP #22 Description: Design and construct pedestrian path on west side of A Street SE under railroad bridge on BNSF property to bypass existing stairs and create an ADA accessible travel path. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - 43,000 - - - 43,000 Grants - 150,000 - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - 193,000 - - - 193,000 Capital Costs: Design - 55,000 - - - 55,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - 138,000 - - - 138,000 Total - 193,000 - - - 193,000 158 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: White River Trail Extension Project No: - Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: TBD TIP #23 Description: The proposed project is the 1,050 foot extension of the existing Class 1 White River Trail from its terminus in Roegner Park to A Street SE/East Valley Highway. The trail extension will link the existing pedestrian facilities from Riverside High School and Ilalko Elementary School to A Street SE. This project will grant school children safe passage across the White River via the bridge on A Street SE. It will also connect to Auburn's BNSF/East Valley Highway Undercrossing, providing direct access from the residential areas in the city of Pacific to schools in Auburn. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $168. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Tota/ Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - 27,200 - - 27,200 Grants - - 174,200 - - 174,200 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - 201,400 - - 201,400 Capital Costs: Design - - 17,500 - - 17,500 Right of Way - - 140,000 - - 140,000 Construction - - 43,900 - - 43,900 Total - - 201,400 - - 201,400 159 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 37th Street SE /'R' Street Connector TIP #24 Project No: Project Type: Class 1 Trail Project Manager: TBD Description: This project will use existing ROW to connect 37th Street SE to 'R' Street SE with a paved Class 1 Trail. Progress Summary: This project is a good candidate for a "Safe Walking Route" grant. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants - 50,400 - - - 50,400 Other - 12,600 - - - 12,600 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - 63,000 - - - 63,000 Capital Costs: Design - 13,000 - - 13,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Total - 63,000 - - - 63,000 160 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Academy Drive Multi -Use Trail TIP #28 Project No: Project Type: Non -Motorized Trail Project Manager: TBD Description: Using the existing right of way, repair the damaged roadbed to a usable multiuse trail on Academy Drive from the Green River Road to Auburn Way South. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 15,000 42,500 42,500 100,000 Grants - - 135,000 382,500 382,500 900,000 Other - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - - 150,000 425,000 425,000 1,000,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - 425,000 425,000 850,000 Total - - 150,000 425,000 425,000 1,000,000 161 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'A' Street SE, Class 2 Trail TIP #29 Project No: (Transit Center to Ellingson along BNSF) Project Type: Non -Motorized Trail Project Manager: TBD Description: Feasibility study for the design and construction of a Class 2 pedestrian trail from the Transit Center from A Street SW to A Street SE and along A Street SE to Ellingson Road along the BNSF right of way. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $3,696. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Other - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - 75,000 - - - 75,000 Grants - - - - - - Other - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total - 75,000 - - - 75,000 Capital Costs: Design - 75,000 - - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total - 75,000 - - - 75,000 162 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Pavement Condition Rating Update Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Annual) Project Manager: TBD TIP #32 Description: Update the Pavement Condition Rating of the Classified Street System. Due to traffic loads that classified streets encounter they need to be re-evaluated on a more frequent schedule to stay current. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 50,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 50,000 Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - Total - - - - - 50,000 163 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: South 277th - Wetland Mitigation Project No: C410A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Scott Nutter TIP #33 Description: Wetland mitigation for the 277th Street Grade Separation project. Progress Summary: This is a 10 -Year obligation, which began in 2004. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 22,607 35,600 15,000 73,207 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: 22,607 35,600 15,000 73,207 Capital Costs: Design - 3,000 3,000 6,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction 22,607 32,600 12,000 67,207 Total Expenditures: 22,607 35,600 15,000 73,207 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 Capital Costs: Design 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 18,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 72,000 Total 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 164 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program TIP #34 Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Annual) Project Manager: TBD Description: This project provides for pedestrian safety studies at various locations citywide. Projects are prioritized annually based on safety issues and pedestrian demands. This is an annual level of effort project used to fund small pedestrian safety studies and improvement projects. Progress Summary: Anticipated by the end of 2005 the crossing on 3rd Street NW near the post office will be completed and a pedestrian crossing on T Street NE near Top Foods will be completed. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 20,000 50,000 70,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 20,000 50,000 70,000 Capital Costs: Design - 5,000 7,500 12,500 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 15,000 42,500 57,500 Total Expenditures: - 20,000 50,000 70,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Costs: Design 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 45,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 42,500 42,500 42,500 42,500 42,500 255,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 165 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure Project No: Improvements Project Type: Non -Capacity (Safety) Project Manager: Various TIP #35 Description: This project provides for infrastructure improvements to enhance traffic safety. Projects are prioritized annually based upon field studies. Progress Summary: Example projects completed include: Guardrail for Oravetz Road, Terrace Drive, and Lake Tapps Parkway. Suggested candidates for 2006 projects: Install "Qwik Kurbs" near RR crossings, or uphill edge of roadway guardrail on Lake Tapps Parkway. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 Grants - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 50,000 50,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 45,000 45,000 Total Expenditures: - - 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Capital Costs: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 55,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 495,000 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 166 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Annual Arterial Pavement Preservation TIP #36 Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Annual) Project Manager: Various Description: Implement regular maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified streets. Progress Summary: Transferring funds to 'C' Street NW as the 2006 Candidate for Pavement Reconstruction. Completed Auburn / Black Diamond Road iin 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - - REET 500,000 - 500,000 Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 500,000 - 500,000 Capital Costs: Design - 20,000 - 20,000 Right of Way - - - Construction - 480,000 - 480,000 Total Expenditures: - 500,000 - 500,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - REET 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Capital Costs: Design 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 2,300,000 Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 167 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity (Annual) Project Manager: TBD TIP #37 Description: Implement regular maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified streets. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 80,000 80,000 Grants - - - - REET - - - - Impact Fees - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 80,000 80,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 75,000 75,000 Total Expenditures: - - 80,000 80,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Grants - - - - - - REET - - - - - Impact Fees - - - - - - Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Capital Costs: Design 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 450,000 Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 168 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 'M' Street SE (37th / 29th) Project No: Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Scott Nutter TIP #38 Description: Rehabilitate 'M' Street SE between 37th Street SE and 29th Street SE, including construction of new pedestrian facilities and replacement of a sanitary sewer line for 1/2 the project. Sewer Utility will be budgeting approximately $400,000 towards their improvements and will be eligible to be counted as our match to the Federal earmark grant. Progress Summary: The pre -design study is completed and we expect design to be completed by the end of 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants - - 400,000 400,000 REET 10,000 75,000 325,000 410,000 Impact Fees - - - - Tota/ Funding Sources: 10,000 75,000 725,000 810,000 Capital Costs: Design 10,000 75,000 - 85,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 725,000 725,000 Total Expenditures: 10,000 75,000 725,000 810,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants - - - 400,000 REET - - - - 325,000 Impact Fees - - - - - Total - - - - - 725,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - 725,000 Total - - - - - 725,000 169 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary LOCAL STREET FUND (103) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program Project No: Varies Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Seth Wickstrom TIP #39 Description: This program was created after passage of Proposition 1 on the November'04 ballot, setting the City's property tax levy limits and creating a dedicated local street fund to be used solely for local street improvements. The program will consist of a number of different contracts focused on the preservation of local streets (unclassified streets) within the City of Auburn. These contracts will include work such as crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre -leveling, asphalt overlays, and pavement preservation. Progress Summary: Approximately 12 miles of residential streets were crack sealed in 2005; Approximately 8 miles of those streets are having an asphalt overlay completed in 2005. Reconstruction of 'M' Street SE between 29th SE and 37th SE is scheduled for 2006 (design is expected to be completed in 2005). Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: None Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Levy Lid Lift - 200,000 269,400 469,400 Sales Tax Revenue - 680,000 - 680,000 Property Tax - New Constr. - - 230,600 230,600 REET2 - - 540,000 540,000 Utility Trench Impact Funds - 150,000 150,000 300,000 Interest -Fund 103 - - 10,000 10,000 Interest -Fund 328 - 170,000 - 170,000 Total Funding Sources: - 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 Capital Costs: Design - 200,000 - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 1,000 000 1,200,000 2,200,000 Total Expenditures: - 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Levy Lid Lift 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 5,669,400 Property Tax - New Constr. - - - - 230,600 REET2 1707000 170,000 170,000 170,000 - 1,220,000 Utility Trench Impact Funds 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 750,000 Interest -Fund 103 - - - - - 10,000 Total 1,220,000 1,520,000 1,820,000 2,120,000 - 7,880,000 Capital Costs: Design 122,000 152,000 182,000 212,000 - 668,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 1,098,000 1,368,000 1,638,000 1,908,000 - 7,212,000 Total 1,220,000 1,520,000 1,820,000 2,120,000 - 7,880,000 170 TABLE T-3 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Impact on Future Operating Budgets TRANSPORTATION Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 3rd St. SE / Cross St. 1,757 1,757 1,757 1,757 1,757 1,757 10,542 2 A' Street Loop 851 851 851 851 851 851 5,106 3 A' St. NE, Phase 1 - - 17,568 17,568 17,568 17,568 70,272 4 Citywide ITS 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 5 'I' St. NE Corridor - - - 17,868 17,868 17,868 53,604 6 'M' St. Grade Separation - - - - - 21,827 21,827 7 S. 277th -AWN to Green River Bridge - - - - - 10,541 10,541 8 A' St. NW, Phase 2 - - - - - 1,405 1,405 9 'D' ST. NW, 37th to 44th - - - - - 14,054 14,054 10 F' St. SE, 4th to A WS - - - 851 851 851 2,553 11 M' St. NE, E.Main to 8th - - - - - 3,514 3,514 12 Realign SR -18 - - - - - - - 13 Harvey 6 8th St. NE - 703 703 703 703 703 3,515 14 Auburn/Pacific Trail 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688 16,128 15 Green River Trail, Phase 1 - - - 2,856 2,856 2,856 8,568 16 Green River Trail, Phase 2 - - - - - - - 17 Green River Trail, Phase 3 - - - - - - - 18 AWS Safety Improv. - - - - - - - 19 Urban Area Transp. System Mgmt.Improv. - - - - - - - 20 Aub. Way Corridor - Pedestrian Crossing - - - - - - - 21 15th St. SW -Reconstruction - - - - - - - 22 15th St. SW -Preservation - - - - - - - 23 'C' St. NW -W. Main to 3rd - - - - - - - 24 W. Main St. Streetscape - - - - - - - 171 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 25 E. Valley Hwy - Pedestrian Underpass - - - 420 420 420 1,260 26 A' St. SE - Pedestrian Improvements - - - - - - - 27 White River Trail Extension - - - 168 168 168 504 28 37th St. SE / R' St. Connector - - - - - - - 29 Academy Drive Multi -use Trail - - - - - - - 30 A' St. SE Trail - - 3,696 3,696 3,696 3,696 14,784 31 Pavement Condition Rating Update - - - - - - - 32 S. 277th -Wetland Mitigation - - - - - - - 33 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program - - - - - - - 34 Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure Improv. - - - - - - - 35 Annual Arterial Pavement Preservation - - - - - - - 36 Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program - - - - - - - 37 'M' St. SE - 37th to 29th - - - - - - - 38 Local Street Improvement Program (Fund 103) - - - - - - - Total 10,296 10,999 32,263 54,426 54,426 105,767 268,177 172 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER Current Facilities The City of Auburn water utility provides water supply, treatment, transmission, storage, distribution, and service connections to both in -City residences, and an approximately 10 square mile potential annexation area adjacent to the City. The water system consists of wells and springs for source, chlorinating stations and aeration for treatment, pump stations and pipelines for transmission, and steel and concrete enclosed reservoirs for storage. Table W-1, "Facilities Inventory", lists the facilities along with their current capacities and approximate locations. Level of Service (LOS) The City's Comprehensive Water Plan summarizes the design criteria for the City's water distribution system. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City of Auburn's water system anticipates 3 capacity projects in the amount of $4,446,000, and 10 non -capacity projects totaling $8,775,000, for a 6 -year planning expectation total of $13,221,000. The financing plan is shown in Table W-2 followed by individual worksheets showing the project details. The capacity projects will increase water supply quantities, storage, and distribution for growth of retail customers. The non -capacity projects will provide for pipeline improvements and replacements, delivery pressure improvements, comprehensive and resource management planning, pump station upgrades, telemetry system improvements, and meter upgrades. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table W-3 shows, operating budget impacts (reductions) of $10,800 are forecasted for water supply and distribution facilities during the six years 2007 — 2012. 173 TABLE W-1 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Facilities Inventory Water Facilities 174 CITY OF AUBURNWATER SYSTEM CAPACITY FACILITY WATER RIGHT (MGD - max rate) LOCATION Water Supply: Algona Well 0.72 Washington Blvd and 3rd Ave S, Algona Coal Creek Springs Certificate 857 9.70<2.52>* 3401 Stuck River Dr West Hill Springs Claim (1973 File Date) 0.9 1900 - 15th St NW ext. Well 1 Certificate 3560-A 3.17 1130 "M" St SE Well 2 G1-00277 C 3.46 519 "K" St NE Well 3A G1-23629 C 4.03 401- 37th St SE Well 3B Included Above Included Above 401- 37th St SE Well 4 G1-20391 C 4.03 950 25th Street SE Well 5 G1-23633 C 1.44 5530 James Ave SE Well 5A G1-25518 P 0.24 5401 Evergreen Way Well 5B (Supplemental to Wells 5 & 5A) 1.68 (supplemental) West end of 62nd Ct SE Well 6 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4) 5.04 (supplemental) 519 "K" St NE Well 7 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4) 5.04 (supplemental) 403 "E" St NE Supply Total (MGD) 26.97 Available for Use 24.45 Denotes deduction of 1,750 gpm (Qi12,824 ac-ft/yr) to comply with the provisions of the Muck leshoot-Auburn Stipulated Agreement. CAPACITY FACILITY (MG) LOCATION SERVICE AREA Storage Facilities: Valley Reservoir 1 5.0 2004 Auburn Way S Valley Service Area Valley Reservoir 2 3.6 32115 - 105th Place S Valley Service Area Academy Reservoir 1 1.0 5002 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Academy Reservoir 2 1.5 5002 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Lea Hill Reservoir 1 1.0 30502 - 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Lea Hill Reservoir 2 1.5 30502 - 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Lakeland Hills Reservoir 1 1.0 1118 57th Place SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Storage Total (MG) 14.6 174 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities 175 CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION Booster Pump Stations: Academy: 4 pumps 2,300 2004 Auburn Way S Green River: 4 pumps 4,680 29621 Green River Rd Academy Intertie: 7 pumps 4,830 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2,000 10406 Lea Hill Rd SE Lakeland Hills: 6 pumps 3,000 1118 57th Place SE Jannsen's Addition: 1 pump 100 3600 Bock Lemon Tree Lane Game Farm Park: 2 pumps 1,060 2401 Stuck River Drive CAPACITY Hydraulic Grade FACILITY (downstream in feet) LOCATION Pressure Reducing Stations: Serves Valley Pressure Zone: Control Valve 1 264 Howard Road Control Valve By -Pass 264 Howard Road (Bypass) Well 4 By -Pass 257 25th Street SE Serves Hemlock: Dogwood North 431 Dogwood St. SE & Auburn Way S. Hemlock 443 Auburn Way S. & Hemlock St. SE Serves Fir: Dogwood South 470 Dogwood St. SE & Auburn Way S. Fir 470 Auburn Way S. West of Fir St. SE Chinook Elementary School 457 Auburn Way S. at Chinook Elementary Serves Clearwater Apartments: Clearwater Apts. North 470 AWS (Clearwater Apt. Connector) Clearwater Apts. South 471 AWS (Clearwater Apt. S. Connector) Poplar Street 484 A WS & Poplar St. River Walk 373 27th St. SE & 27th Place SE Serves Lea Hill: Lea Hill 500 500 304th St. SE West of 112th Ave. Lea Hill 462 462 SE 298th Place & 109 Ave. SE Lea Hill 406 406 304th St. SE West of 108th Ave. Lea Hill 401-1 401 Lea Hill Rd. S.E. Lea Hill 401-2 401 Lea Hill Rd. & 106 Place Lea Hill 415 415 Lea Hill Rd. & 107 Place Lea Hill 299 299 104th Ave SE (South of 303rd Road) Lea Hill 173 173 SE 304th Place & SE 101st Place Reservoir Apts. North 425 105th Place SE & 320th place Reservoir Apts. South 395 105th Place SE Near Reservoir 2 175 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities and Hills Zone 1 640 Nathan Avenue & 49th Street Hills Connection 243 Oravetz Road @ Mill Pond Drive and Hills Zone 3 545 51st St. SE east of cul-de-sac and Hills Zone 3 547 Lakeland Hills Way. & Mill Pond Dr. and Hills Zone 3 624 Evergreen Way & Lakeland Hills Way and Hills Zone 2 401 Lakeland Hills Way & 47th SE and Hills Zone 2 390 Mill Pond Dr. & Mill Pond Loop and Hills Zone 2 659 Quincy Ave N of 53rd St SE and Hills Zone 1 242 Lakeland Hills Way & Oravetz CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION Coal Creek CCTF 4,600 2104 Howard Street Fulmer Field CC TF 9,600 1113 5th St NE Chlorination Stations: 0. 03 MGD 4501 47th St SE Storage Facilities: Coal Creek Springs Station 2,400 (gravity feed) 3401 Stuck River Drive West Hill Springs Station 625 (gravity feed) 1900 15th Street NW Well 4 950 25th Street SE Well 5B 600 West end of 62nd Ct SE 176 BRAUNAS?MSAT LLITE WATER SYSTEM FACILITY CAPACITY LOCATION Water Su I : Braunwood Satellite #1 0. 03 MGD 4501 47th St SE Storage Facilities: Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MG 4501 47th St SE Booster Pump Stations: Braunwood: 3 Pumps 2.0 GPM 4501 47th St SE 176 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary TABLE W-2 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING 2009 WATER DIVISION 2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capacity Projects: 1 Cross Street Pipeline Construction (DS -116-809) Capital Costs 36,000 - - 36,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 36,000 - - - 36,000 2 Lea Hill Booster Pump Station Capital Costs - - 160,000 1,100,000 1,260,000 Funding Sources: 1,100,000 Water Fund - - 160,000 - - 160,000 PWTFL - - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 3 Lakeland Hills High Zone Reservoir Capital Costs - 500,000 2,650,000 3,150,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 500,000 2,650,000 3,150,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 36,000 160,000 1,100,000 500,000 2,650,000 4,446,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Non -Capacity Projects: 4 Annual Repair & Replacements Capital Costs 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 6,500,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 6,500,000 5 SCADA (Telemetry) Upgrades Capital Costs 170,000 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 813,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 170,000 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 813,000 6 Water Resources Protection Program Capital Costs 15,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 15,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 7 Academy Service Area Rezone Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 8 Vulnerability Assessment Recommendations Capital Costs 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 325,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 325,000 177 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Non -Capacity Projects (cont.): 9 Emergency Standby Generators Capital Costs 230,000 - - - - - 230,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 230,000 - - - - - 230,000 10 Blow -off Installation on Deadend Mains Capital Costs 10,000 100,000 - - - - 110,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 100,000 - - - - 110,000 11 Comprehensive Water Plan Capital Costs - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 12 Well 5 Rehabilitation Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 13 Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Subtotal, Non -Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,950,000 1,945,000 1,166,000 1,221,000 1,167,000 1,326,000 8,775,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 36,000 - 160,000 1,100,000 500,000 2,650,000 4,446,000 Non -Capacity Projects 1,950,000 1,945,000 1,166,000 1,221,000 1,167,000 1,326,000 8,775,000 Total Costs 1,986,000 1,945,000 1,326,000 2,321,000 1,667,000 3,976,000 13,221,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Water Fund 1,986,000 1,945,000 1,326,000 1,221,000 1,667,000 3,976,000 12,121,000 PWTFL - - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Total Funding 1,986,000 1,945,000 1,326,000 2,321,000 1,667,000 3,976,000 13,221,000 178 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Cross Street Pipeline Construction (DS -116-809) Project No: C1006 Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: Jennifer Dvorak Description: Construct a new 12 -inch pipeline in Cross Street from A St. SE to Auburn Way So. Project will be performed in two phases; Phase 1 will be limited to the intersection of Cross & 'A' Street SE. Phase 2 will be determined at a later date. Progress Summary: Assuming property acquisitions are complete. This project could be completed in 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 100,000 36,000 136,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 100,000 36,000 136,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - 100,000 36,000 136,000 Total Expenditures: - 100,000 36,000 136,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - 36,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 36,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 36,000 Total - - - - - 36,000 179 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Booster Pump Station Project No: C9020 Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: TBD Description: Increase the pumping capacity to provide the Maximum Daily Demand (MDD) for the Lea Hill service area. Required to minimize the storage required in the Lea Hill service area and to meet future MDD. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. This pumping station will replace the existing station. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - PWTF - - - - Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - 160,000 - - - 160,000 PWTF - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - 160,000 1,100,000 - - 1,260,000 Capital Costs: Design - 160,000 - - - 160,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Total - 160,000 1,100,000 - - 1,260,000 180 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lakeland Hills High Zone Reservoir Construction Project No: 430Q Project Type: Capacity (Expansion) Project Manager: TBD Description: Construct a new total capacity of 2.65 million gallon reservoir on a track of land next to Francis Court SE cul-de-sac in the Lakeland Hills service area. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: This project will require routine inspections by water operations staff. The annual maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,200. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 500,000 2,650,000 3,150,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - 500,000 2,650,000 3,150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,650,000 2,650,000 Total - - - 500,000 2,650,000 3,150,000 ITX City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Repair & Replacements (PR -201) Project No: 430A Project Type: Non -Capacity Project Manager: Various Description: Funding set aside for replacing water lines as predetermined by the Water Utility. Projects will be coordinated with the Local Street Program and other utility projects. Progress Summary: In support of the 2006 SOS program, $250,000. In support of the 'R' Street Storm project, $320,000. In support of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement project, $285,000. In support of the W. Main Street project, $160,000. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 100,000 100,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: 100,000 100,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Capital Costs: Design 10,000 10,000 100,000 120,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 900,000 1,080,000 Total Expenditures: 100,000 100,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 6,500,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 1,000,000 1,1001000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 6,500,000 Capital Costs: Design 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 120,000 650,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 900,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 1,080,000 5,850,000 Total 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 6,500,000 182 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: SCADA Upgrades Project No: 430J Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Gary McConnell Description: The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA, also know as Telemetry system) is in need of upgrading. The existing system, based upon an independent SCADA assessment study, has numerous obsolete components and does not allow control of the Sewer and Storm utility stations. Upgrading portions of the system utilizing antiquated equipment, while maintaining portions that are compatible with newer technologies seems to be the logical course of action. The new system will utilize an open architecture. RFP will be sent in 2006 and construction to begin in 2007. Progress Summary: A pre-desuign report has been prepared by ECS Engineering, Inc. System design will begin in the fall of 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 50,000 170,000 220,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - 50,000 170,000 220,000 Capital Costs: Design - 50,000 170,000 220,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - 50,000 170,000 220,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 813,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 813,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 170,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 643,000 Total 530,000 - 55,000 - 58,000 813,000 183 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Resources Protection Program Project No: C1013 Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Chris Thorn Description: Water Resources Protection Program will identify potential hazards, identify actions and begin the implementation program to protect the City's water resources. Progress Summary: Proceeding to incorporate the water resource protection areas into the sensitive areas ordinance. Next step will be the implementation of program recommendations. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget _ Budget Amendments _ Adjusted Budget Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 15,000 15,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 15,000 15,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 15,000 15,000 Total Expenditures: - - 15,000 15,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 Total 15,000 16,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 97,000 184 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Academy Service Area Rezone (PZ -101) Project No: C8036 Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Jeff Roscoe Enterprise Funds Description: Construct two new pressure reducing stations to create a new pressure zone to replace the existing individual zones which currently exist. Progress Summary: Project has been incorporated with the Auburn Way So. Sewer Conveyance project and will be constructed as a part of the second phase of the project in 2006. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: The decrease in the number of pressure reducing stations should lower the annual operating costs by approx. $2,000. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 27,000 24,000 150,000 201,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: 27,000 24,000 150,000 201,000 Capital Costs: Design 27,000 24,000 - 51,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 150,000 150,000 Total Expenditures: 27,000 24,000 150,000 201,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - 150,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 150,000 Total - - - - - 150,000 185 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Vulnerability Assessment Recommendations Project No: 430K Project Type: Non -Capacity (improvements) Project Manager: TBD Description: Based upon an independent Vulnerability Assessment Study, security upgrades to the existing water utility facilities may be required. Included with these security upgrades are upgrades to tank safety equipment, based on safety reports. Progress Summary: Looking for funding for initiatives outlined in the consultant recommendation. Looking at replacing the obsolete portions of the SCADA system. A hydrant permit policy was implemented in 2005. Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: This project will need to be analyzed to calculate the impact on the Water Division's operating budget once a scope is identified. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 75,000 75,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 75,000 75,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 70,000 70,000 Total Expenditures: - - 75,000 75,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 325,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 325,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 320,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 325,000 186 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Enterprise Funds Emergency Standby Generators (Lea Hill Intertie & Well 4) C512A Non -Capacity (Improvements) Gary McConnell Description: Provide automatic transfer switch and an on-site emergency generator system to run Well 4 and Lea Hill Intertie Pump Station during a power failure. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact; However, an annual maintenance agreement will be required and there will be staff time used for routine maintenance. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 230,000 230,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 230,000 230,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 200,000 200,000 Total Expenditures: - - 230,000 230,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - 230,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 230,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 200,000 Total - - - - - 230,000 187 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Project Title: Blow -off Installation on Deadend Mains Project No: 430N Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Tim Osborne, P.E. Enterprise Funds Description: Identify and install all deadend mains with a blow -off assembly or hydrant to improve water quality and fire flow capability via routine flushing program. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact; However, it will require visits by water distribution staff to flush mains as a part of the deadend main flushing program. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 10,000 10,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 10,000 10,000 Capital Costs: Design - - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - Total Expenditures: - - 10,000 10,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 100,000 - - - - 110,000 Grants - - - - - - Total 100,000 - - - - 110,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - - Construction 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total 100,000 - - - - 110,000 188 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Water Plan Project No: 430P Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Tim Osborne, P.E. Description: Update Comprehensive Water Plan in 2007 as required by Washington State Department of Health. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - Grants - - - Total Funding Sources: - - - - Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - Total Expenditures: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue 250,000 - - - 250,000 Grants - - - - - Total 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Capital Costs: Design 250,000 - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total 250,000 - - - - 250,000 189 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Well 5 Rehabilitation Project No: 430S Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: TBD Description: The current Well 5 facility does not meet Building Code and is in need of upgrades to the building structure. The Water Utility is also planning to install chlorination equipment and a manual transfer switch on-site. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 150,000 150,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 150,000 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 150,000 150,000 Total Expenditures: - - 150,000 150,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - 150,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 150,000 Total - - - - - 150,000 190 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2006-2011 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitaion Project No: 430T Project Type: Non -Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager: Tim Osborne, P.E. Description: The Coal Creek Springs' middle collector is currently under -producing. Upon observations, it appears that the pipe perforations in the middle collector are calcified and a portion of the springs are not being captured. The Water Utility will attempt to modify the middle collector in 2006 and capture more water. Progress Summary: Impact on Operating Budget Once Completed: No significant impact. Current Year Budget: 2006 YTD Actual Budget Budget Expenditures Balance Adopted Budget - Budget Amendments - Adjusted Budget - - - Activity: 2005 YE 2006 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2005 Estimate 2006 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 150,000 150,000 Grants - - - - Total Funding Sources: - - 150,000 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 150,000 150,000 Total Expenditures: - - 150,000 150,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2006-2011 Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - 150,000 Grants - - - - - - Total - - - - - 150,000 Capital Costs: Design - - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 150,000 Total - - - - - 150,000 191 TABLE W-3 City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan --Preliminary Impact on Future Operating Budgets WATER 192 Project: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Cross St. Pipeline Construction - - - - - - - 2 Lea Hill Booster Pump - - - - - - - 3 Lakeland Hills High Zone Resevoir - - - - - 1,200 1,200 4 Annual Repair/Replacements - - - - - - - 5 SCADA Upgrades - - - - - 6 Water Resources Protection Prgm. - - - - - - - 7 Academy Service Area Rezone (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (12,000) 8 Vulnerability Assessment Recommendation - - - - - - - 9 Emergency Generators - - - - - - - 10 Blow -off Installations, Dead End Mains - - - - - - - 11 Comp. Water Plan - - - - - - - 12 Well 5 Rehabilitation - - - - - - - 13 Coal Creek Springs - - - - - - - Total (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (800) (10,800) 192 P/T #7 City of Auburn Transportation Plan 2005. Incorporate the City of Auburn Transportation Plan 2005 as an element of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. O H z N t U .L O ++ V W m m m m m m m O coo 79 E 3 0 O o 0 �+ O e4 0 � o �'N 0 0) U) a) 0) U) O W 0) U) t a�.cn v -t c.Nvv ,.cn -0 C: An _+0. 0.9 E E (D OE E Q) O E E m 0•E E _ m c E m c E m c E u c E o; vv c- W :° cu Ecco m � W C t: O Nm .0 NE0- a)0La0Co o(Date p oCoa0cnc m m c ° O a >' ° E -0= L O L O L O s o E cy o W W 402 CD (0 c6 N in Y c0 _ U U U 0 s m C N C m c0 U .,m 5E•-= cao m OE 0 O > O ui E a >: O L •E > O O O O � U >a, m—�p W O=. y N N rn'C 7 LO " v o� m� a 0 E li a C C cL mm cn 00a)° �Ecnaa°o 7 N m N _ L O Q Q .C- d J a rn c c o L Z 0.0 V co N a O �0 0 0 o H a U) w vl vl (D o US N 0 U t 7 7 7 c U Qa LLU-LT(D cn m C � p• N O m Q, i H p N CD ;tz: ++ cn w •X N [2 W H i N U) w. m :3 :3 cLO rn�•rn•rna� - U •- E E l.L Q LL LL Zcn cd ri C NU-)++ _ O T N sam Ca�) •� V NNM N aG �-0 = m�° ch D) mm mo o J CL CL CL LU T N M W" o o m m U) cyj°�,c�o C ._ c m O -0 2 Mn E 79 E 3 E c 0 0 0 V CD cn t U U) O N p i cn a, >, CU 0 0 t •c c C U Ev- rn a)0 a) o E E cn L� 0 E N c a)0-0 cn O = >, L cn �,Q,o a> o; vv c- W :° cu Ecco m � W C t: O Nm .0 NE0- a)0La0Co o(Date p oCoa0cnc m m c ° O a >' ° E -0= r-c�0 s o E cy o >� c ° rn O C C U C c 'N C a) ,C 'nEc in Y c0 a E m w W o m L L O � C N C C O m = a) E•Fu .,m 5E•-= m 0 O > O ui E a >: O L •E > i Oa C > �, U L NU C m a) > w m a) C a U -0 � .V N C O 04v 0 m—�p W O=. y N N rn'C 7 v o� m� a 0 E cm cncNCEO m ` C 0 C cL mm cn 00a)° �Ecnaa°o N _ L O T a T N d J a o N O O m .p c}0, o U) mc.� Cu (�0 o U) cc U a c o Y E ' C �.r Qi L ++ _ T C O L C -0 C 'O _ .N T C O L C M C 'y -0 c E C O U O ` a) ` a) -0 .0 cL °-EME0) aEaE °?�L o E C 7 Vi , A -o 'E ocn cv ;o o= �o F`.0v N c HU v c cU a) cncnU p CCUs (n 0 -� -o E a) f0 C O = d v Co aa)) o > a,00�w �� Q 3 Np Cu ° w w `N.v_� °�' C° Co o 0 0 3 c aa)) p "C Uni cCo o c � o m-0 E o= u� c c`0 c o a) a) c_ Qi U O 'C a Q" a) N )> +L. c� 7 U U V V C N O C (0 a) H fl a3 1- v (n U- U- C HYCO N v C C ° a) E N I� a •+: NI co C >� L C U) a) �' '�- N .. O C C r -C O a) C 4— ++ L L Y C .... f0 N N L O �' O a-0 o ° c0 3 ° m � 4— � r o N t0 � Q E C o o �Q o o �a�� V) D O D O `� Oo �.S ` o �., Q' C) U v c o c n in c O C O 3 E `O N uni o O (D a) N yUi N C+'N N ° V Co N 'O oma- C OC OU) T a) -v `OXO E C pCU `°4 ty Ct NC � �Y N `O aE N >cu �y a) ° �N Q`�° c E U) a) p a) O E O E° U C C C_ Y Y c Q U) U O f0 Q O>> 0 7 C N N Cl) C C .0 '�-�,, N O I— O C C Q O O 2-1 Q O f'— a) O C C m - O F0 C .. E ani .0 .0 O N F- a) - E- N O U) C Y N c0 C 4? a) (A a N ,, `Q a N a CL Cn ccvQU�Em mE `md E N° :3 O °� 0 C Mco } O a)-0-O.Va O +- m O� HBO a) w .. C 3 rna�i a O a) N C w C� O C Q U, E a) ; O++ p C) C Q t N rn�_ Z v C °) C> C C O, N .- a) C C O v a) a) U O QC C L c0.� 7> C Ea) m a) 0.2 C 4- C N Q) . C t0 a_° U) a •U (n O c0 O 0' a) oo v" a 'C Q(n N (L0 w O O Co O O U U a C �' O F- E U O -O C O p 3 Q C O U t C L f`0 L Cp CL 0 Z Q) Q1 O a) `_T'Q °O O O C a) L C 'C F-�. n H E._,. F -H c,cn YYY ncOQOUF 0— n Y �..._ c0Y — a) ° IX a) c (, Ens rn` N c aci O� N T F, N m =C) magi C CL 2 ° �� N cQ 0 �Q'i �'co °'c> nE o f0 E m ° aEil-� ao o o M �l-N CV S O N ++ C ° c sn -E ° a) a)-0 ai HZ >'- U, c`aNv o 3U E n Gi I-�O a C a)— )�O—Q� D a) D CQ} 0 OL O a) Or > C C En ` E f0 C C (�O a0 W O O .a T'x C° 'O N .'� 4— ` �0 +_ a) O O U C Q. a L � Q- U) > _ CO O Q a' C N� nQ Ci a) a N O N ` C +) C a) O E U) C a) M + = m O Q a) a)L .. .O O �p •C c 0--a a .n nL C 6 N Cu L- Q 7 7 r- O O -O E a) C 0 N L O r� O O N ,C� n U - f0 0 O O n a) a) a0 a) p �-' 5 E +: M w. UM) c aw-'- �(na)U) �L ODUwoo'c2 E�'v,E'v, rnrn� E a) N E o N 2 Cr- Z Z Z v°i > o O m E c0 H4-. E H H v(n2 YYYH cn v� o01 -U nH cnH C O N Ce) t r °" s n p L CL V- n rn rn CL J rnT �2 CU m an ns ns an c0 — a — cu — a,? F47t- cfl ao rn N m N m d N N in O L O p a> L O a) a -O a N a � •N IT C — ++N U E o U E O O' c cu mo E E C: E y ACL CL cinaig 0 Mme. Gi = N O N o m C dU E p °EoCa)E V p U U O EVU CU aWE`—°ccu(n aW U`um o E aa)) 1 V c o 3 N �'� o > U N a) Q s c Y c O O N� ami 0L� a?' ted' a) mL a) a 0 C O J E � 0 CY) m � cu N CL >� N N c.0 � rn (.),a ccu .2 > � E— oU c a� 3 aEi� a? n2 L m 'p m> (D o .5; cy a) c c ° �.� c Z p N c 3 2� a� cpm c= c"pi'c m c N aa))�� o d �a m c) :3 O E O ..m' H a) O N a� � E.. a w � � — .cam c g c O c a C a) U O a) a) �L aca�. 0 O N N cU a) O c) J cn N, Li `' a) Q' C Y a•— ca> oE�N'3 V�+ U L L Q :3 -r- C NU O a) a a)cc O N +L•' ca C V a J .. N C i'= V a) O .0 a) _ 'C55 a) L p U 0 E o = r V p 0 d a) E 0� ZW c` c mow- C c a NY ccu��Y C ca uMi ca vii aEi 2 Z N rn ca 0- — 7 O p> E .` .r O C 2 :«. m N coj~ a ,C (n O N -6 ca O' ,« 6 z, Z c E •C a. p> fA a) O O O a N= 3 0 +. �c 3 a) c Q a) ca a) N E" a O U N C C N C N O c f/i O C C— >, I L L U m fl' = ca E N O o p a)_ N N- a O 3 cu a) C O N O N Y N E E +. C +. ca L +-, p ._, a COU N a .... (� a) Z 3 a) p ''', >, .... >+ ca O N C C L +-' N N a) N "a ,�+'- a) L L a) U N L cu Ncu 7 C ta p (a (tea N +' ca a) ma a) m m c6 C Q `a U a) W .0 a) O N p0 a) U O ca N ...+ `o ° U o °o 7 c N c"=��=Qs'a) V .p a cn o O� c•°jOo .n ° o .0 ._-. U a) o L N nw cp'ca U Q E Q-0— aa)) U a) ca6UaF- C N 2 ca o 3cn N2 O U ani ° Na c.) N >> o ol— E2Q ai m e c C� (n C o =1 N— N E m � a) my o �� `? o a s�L NQS C a O p LL 3 N N O V U .� a)"= N y c: U Y U) m r a) �� a a) = C >L m U N> �- C— a E O ca U n a) +' C 0., a) O N• C N 'n -t c a 0 ca O O O L a C°,yoN��.=-0.(E C: aj V Z c = °Um aNi �° E :'- E C a '0'- — oU; 0 CU C07 c E aT 0 aE O >,3 � c —- p E J 0- 3 O (0 po a) c L C E L E N .nca Q ca a) cu a 0- �' V ca L a ' a) ca N L U a N n C C p O L p O C Q)L 0 Q Y L o a (A Z L N m E M c a) a) 0)_ 7 cp 7 Q a)�� V> () a) a-0 U E C O O N O a) L a (" C S N C U AL U U) -n ' 4 _ O (D 0. CLL a) 1 ca IL O 0) a) a CUa) c ai a) cu a J N n C N.0) CO= dm o CL LL cL C) r r N �-- M C LO ¢ N C O N 'C .Q O CL O CO) C O Z L .N C d t d L fl. E V _ U cna) C r- 04 O m O �- C O 0) Y E c M .. C O 0)N u) c ° L cc V_ m U) +cu o fn tm° coo d O E v c ~ U N O c cu O m ° U a v c • c°) a)mN v tea. N c`o a)tm mW"0WW-0 v•C c a. a) U 0 cu a)rn� -a V _. .0 c .F ma) Mn' -o a) E a a) cn �Y >, a) .. o E ., a) -r- a) O :a c c ., c E E rnm m E,� a) o «. c E a) a a E E c c_v .. O c cu E =° � O= m c E °i E cn c ,� .. N 7 m 0 0 0= m C C m L a m c E , 7 m o ca m E v' o 19 , L O C U c� cU cncnU �cnaU ZU o v w w 3 �cnaU ~U v �-(Dui a) v J02 d (na - N3 -c ? a � o> O : 3Uoo� T 12 � w°jc :n cr Ca) w U U O U O a L C C aC d V U Y HE to E m v Y m v) 0-0 m.9 "° m � U rnN a) ° a) ° d .. > H 'D �v �v CL F m cmi.0Q ch - aa)) C Q1 C 'p C v)- N c M tlJ C C,C O in C O m C C y D ° m= O m C. L mU a) O CL N O in Co a In `~ o Q N o `-- V a) m c _N L a) a) ._a)ca) y= cU(n cn °cmcncd c ..a N�� I°) ac ca)2. 3�3 =ca cc co L mrn cn a) C C C v) -O a) +-� : U = _ (n ml U M C to � uS a) •- U cn -° v a) t v) O v a oo 'C 3 -0 a) m3:3 ui cUc=u fA (n a o cu C t o U E J m i' V" 0 a) `> to m v m •c c° C O CL O O c O = c" y O s- N C E p> CU U F= ���'cu y w -LL co ��p` y ma 3 m O m°[ V y N CL °ooa N�'�y'v D_ CLU). p E'er a) La co IL-ao N.3Q ac) wo M<"a a? (n -0 V a) E c a)::•Y °O c 2 c`v' m_ �- > cm fu a CNZ U ,c � Y E a) m U C fD O C O yr N .0 m" c c O O U > C U cn a) p) N 7 - V E r`O.cu - C U E C 'c U N a) L a)` m f0 F- -a C.-a20CL m� >, C v1 N 9 y>- m OCD �.) > o N N N ° a) d U o U C w o �' EU m m .n EI E ° N o Z U a) m 0 0 E U E a) m5 4. a)C cu y cn > _ U C m m L_ m >, a) D N 7 p -O E°mom' v �•�'Z' a) c �amiU v� 3 ay E E m o vii `=�vi a� W mLa �Lv a) >L " ° 0 a o m °-0 E a) -v L c�•� 3 a� °oma U N O t N •° m 7 cm t N ° O m N° rn O i E c C cn w "p a m •C m° Y E 12 a) a.cn dE cn O m cn C 'a C ..- 0 m O L L -0 ° - w `' (D LL E ° = t m E > O E� a) a) o > ° U ~ = o o ,� cn a) ,,°-__ c`o co' 3 o E vCL _ a o a w-- C -o 5 o cuc me V0 cm CD O (n > U a) 3QN c cn QQo cu ��'� o .°_°o a c= E m a c as � C-0 � m o� �crncnam N a) �� E m :r .S ma) _° w C C N C aEa)c N E .a m ��-� C U •C c= a) V C ., C U U N a cn cn rn n cn = c a CU w a CD a) N vJ N a) C 0 a a) U > a) > "a a) C L a) C C N � -O m c +.. >, lL (n U .0 U U C C N C O a) U m U U c o _ c Z C C U c ` LL U E E) Cl) Oc CL L .o L M c .� N C'4 d L) o Q. N N m N N 0) L M Q. a) V aJ T C CD N=- N c a)EQ N c a)Ea N c C a)Eaa) a) rn ° a)E�a rn= a) rn=_ rn�_ rn= � C d a U CL d U d U d U d w v°i i* Cl) T cf T tC) T CO T T 0 4-1 a= OC 0 N�+ m o coo m w m� rncw U).. U).. a O NC c •up N Q a vo-i ° w CL cm Mo E v -E C.SQ v tf C An O. aE:aE �oca 'cE °?o'cE 'C .Q C ;� LEc0 r -E R cE � —� c ~U co) cc)a0 cfnaU LZ L Ncn " O m m O y0. C1 _NN v �ccc G1 - C o�mcn 2 cEEm O U 7 C N N U t U O CL =ca U-rM o c2-0 o HrnQwcco �cC -P"CL S32u)Q u. CL L 4) CY cn 'O C to O O N m N N N 'a C M O O 7 0` U C % m U O C m r U O c cn p 0 O m a) N 3 O2:21 - .0N m m U cn N �_ O-0 ` -O " O N N O p 2� N'�- Ute- 7 M C �-0 O m n (D =3 U N Q O Co I V O m O� '> C E O 0 p - t- m O N C U t NNNNUN N N m N 4--om .Occno Ejt m O U c CE n>�0 0c ma(Ccn `ooaU'E O E� ma) m E N > > > M > �a O>• c0a)o�E�>Ea)o2cn LU m,No~�° c oa wg aC cr oN2' N cn m cn i o n ( C a)� voi m Ems`- °coo w 3M a) °a o- coi c� cn o Q o o N CY o c m� 00 c� U �.L m ESQ >� c U a) W O` co E 0` �•U) j c y-0� 2 cn c c N C c to N p a) c U-0 N c }` U) a� m O cn .N O m N W N Lma)–�0W 0 ��o o omEa) y v)a _ p 4- >_ U O m U m` o �p U a C� _ Q 0 O a m (n O m co: a) Q N H 2 m m N N p (n N Z m O m Z� L U) >m O Q p m > U m C i+ p) Q C, L m 7 d <` C 7 N L a L •a W Q N L V C O .. W 0 'm Q O O .r M f– Wt� W� ` Z a) m O c U) `O y 1E 0 CL fAc (Aaa))c O O E Z Za aXiE N ? _ E v c ? 0 O O M N m w �� OC f - EO i N N N E 0 a O N V o p N O C C O p O 0 ` N N m N 0 u J CL Co cc) CL a 0 *k co rn N 0 � a �d r-� �� +� O v CY) Cl) Kaci 0.a�iCL oc•N 0E c 7 N cuca cacEE o ccnd0 c cu L a) U) cud E.+O a) V a) N O C a) CL 0-6 cnc cn cn °) > _ > a) m a °' ca) 0 3 mv�cn cn O a) c (n c o > 3acn m � m a) -o m co E ti <o ca a) a) a)w c-0 O +.. C', c_ E m �c �- 7 0 ca a N O O L U O ti .- C C O O E c 3� •� p c cu Z5 cu�E (n /��.� �w a`�iLLv } m a) fn c LU U w �H E c/off �� c �•� y w O VJ �� O µ_ > O o O m M _ �•�?:c_ •� •� .O 1_ N m _O � 30 a) O N :,/ E o U 0 E O > O — — U to (0 'U .O a) M a1 N G1 � a) .c a) m N �= c�(n rnL �V N �mrnE> V m� m c 0 E� E o alma v N am o,�co -0 m c O cn— •C rn c O. o Ea)v0.- O -2 c U m m a)a) wpc U O 0) O coa) O p = oc tea) m sNom m a) > N t -C o c v� � a) m 't 't cn � 3 c o c .� E � U c a)om c JF- L .� : ,n � � tea) m a) cn ? � � m p cv 0 Co L H N z C () N E a) '- +. O`` - m Q) a) U C m - O a) U O CL U� a)�cu s �. c�(n a) oU��,��o U a) c. � � v �. m 9 m �o�� -v y o �a `9_v m c� U- E o o' Z o m O �— M E M 'cn c c a) az. Q v �- to oo Co a) 70 �.E m cn�o v� c �.- E U) a C m N o a) o N 3 O 3 c-0 c co 0 a -o co 0 ��-� Q °).;. EUo� a) O>o,m,�c)o �a)� N�(6d)viEL.cm 0 o o �cc�'c a) m c 0 U CY O o a) c C O— .S c LL p) + m 0— Scn '� U Z a)•�'" c o— c J O O ,� c •— 3 ms m J o U 3 -0 «, LLv_ m o c oa 'O 0 O v 0 N Z O V .� -0 a) U-0 �mmr- Oa H. -Lw U. 5 a) 0 o: cn O U a) 3 0 CY v ac cSn FL- am) mi mi aa c > >o c m O L~ o_ Ecn C � � r � LL O .0 �. 7 3 :3 0O C N C fco O/ C M i) Q -0 m C N L C p) 7 L C O C 0 7 " ca I-- vi 0 m C U 0 t c a m zo 0 0 c� 'C U p c U 0 O` c a O c O �. comrn:r� -t cn p a) -CL rn c s O C a) :3O � Z_� M 4 3 c p �y iv(D mcrn r,: IM N C (� C �L CL O mE Q)fn E� J rn2 m p)= 0U).0U) 0 O d U d a c ) .0 J m O �$ r N N N >+ m m -p cc ca O CLCLO _N L Jqd o cmr— O O N t d V N N a) > :2 0 N- � Ln U a) a O co co ► M N m oa a m O +_ 'N a)+. c E o N rn in N 0 O = cm o° 0 L`'� 3° C 0 (D 0.. w a) a� m c t O '' o N co O U tom `- ° r- o ° C () ° o a) o C o} CO +. �. 0 a) m co c o a� C w m cn -p m } co as co c= cn U C N 7 m .� oa E a� > apt N U a� a� o� _ �� �, o �'� E �� Nc� -c O O O =CU a~ c`m a) O a) U O U co O L co a c.� .0 -0 co •� +•� C U cuCy w > LL. dQ) W C Z O 0� cncoi�uw m c g co v. SCO=auiE(n� om a m �� p a) a�3v�i�E�°�. = O a) c p N(D a) -° N O 4) N C �cLp�L N a) O co oa.. °cr- o a�o0Q,- �, U -p a� �E-a a� o f a-0 O >cn 4-2- c= cn o c °o �Y ° �o °� U cap o O O c U O Y (n N N O C N N +� c a) c0 - LL LL O— cn M 0` O U co •o ` Q L cyj O L O ��, (n .0 C } � '— ` N O a) {y (n a) O J co `�- > C ° > cn CL = cn.cn O c� C �� as ° U'3 `. cn O N O N U v-0 aa) n c N fo C a) D O N v US N m c a _ ° E '— a) . O °v O �o O co N U O L -0 4? Cu N a) a) O r a)cnoQi +� a) ` N «. O O Cc >U a) cN O cn a) cn _ co w°— N rn O'er U j N = O _ ° ° a) m •—N= N E a) c V N c E 2 o U .SaiU)to(nca> u) io'— 2 a) a) ° cn o W to_ cn co U m°a)aU U opo—f°.. O'c LL. caro 3o c°3` OO=a) o a� OEo 'cUco-0`a)Q)=oa�� 4) O�a) o OO t > Ocn CA C d L L U c M a " 0 J r- C O � O CL N ON O CL 0) N , = O L .N C t L CL O U Am .� �a) 2E >c N \1E c: 'C ) �n c -0 O ami m'N �c M p) ° c'� U a) m CL C ,N -C T � d ,N CL C 7 O m� N ED O c E 0 c E .- O m 3 N E CO 7 CU O C 7 0 C O 7 o —U a) cncn0 —cnn.0 _U_ cncoU C L tm U++ J02 cu N.+ C =O a) U O� m o V c U a) �� j >O O 0 U) e3 s c N m ca (0 O` <9 Q N a) U a) T co Oco cO tm C Oc j I- -0 m J m J O Y U CL L O +' N N— N -a m a) O O U) +' Lu Z a) cu U a �� wa).=_ L �w O a a L > m m� a) (DO p tea) -Em C to ++ L' cn . mp` C a C6 UtmNOWa)w>CL ,� m N O 3 Z ., O L (Da") c o c U C m - ULL N x L a p E m =O y° °r° N O =- C c N C m N c > a) w > o a O > c0 U p — >a, a c0 a) c0 O c 0 �, ° o „- u, mc O'C3�m0cc v, U a� �, m �CJC 0 .o ca c� U �, a m w d v _ •� m c U t p cn a) E Y �, m LOM t~ O N�C`CmN T.0 'mv c >O ` U m a Q 0 m CO c N p 7 f�A a) C N} O N N N 7 Y a) E to U U 7 C `O 3 w C 0-0 `� 7 E S ` N m N Q. O m UCoov N O O � 2aocUcu4-._ m p e L os aT(— o aUy a) .. c C o L a) a) o a N C oma m G. Eoo Eo 0V L� N 0N -NU o 'c C (D N ct ujm Oro +mto- 0` a) a) 7 E A -a _ •�m' c a) c .2 o _E_ v Y Q ujZm Z .c spmU Q o N`cmN N—CL C L ' `a Ou O 0 O N 0) (D o in- OLU cy O LE O O m U) C mQ� mE U a)c 4- oO O.L a) C LEw} vom- `= a) O: NC En -ma-) C 3NaU 0 U oaU Z m y m L � a) L a) E O E N pp c m o .=3ui O o p.E O CL0 N N X 0 T m-Ov CL _0 C a) L C T M m 40 a)XQE W N o U a) +. ovc L C D N U O`U 7 O 0) 7 L } Q o L E N .N 7 Q C' V v 3r m CU EQ E� °, +_ c 3 :3_0 .n C ao CU rncU c (9 c�00c <3: � )tC w J -C: - O C cn U)m m cn >, O O E30 $ 3 N H OLvLu ..a)w cu v Oc J m a) (D E E UO >3o a cn E m a) a o L U) L 'C O m � in -1 DU � 1— 2 3: 2 a M .+ N N N w v IM M �p L ti N C,Q C N d Q N C L N C 2 f N C N f CCL J o E Q _ o L o `° D) :3L CL cu U 75 m CL U a d U Q # C) 04 04 E N 00 = O a N _ O(1)U CF) O 'C O cu _, �. = Y E _, Z oo c a•- c c N� c b c� .E c.N- O- cu r.L ()oin- a -E — a)cu -v ' -0,a) -p cn E nU .a)—m0� -o oCC co E O o a o � mU E aE C L. a) o E � o� ty yO cd U) O E 0) c a� •rp .+�-• N E E `(nO UN O () 0) O _0•ca n� co u cu cu oN O WipM E— ca cn O rn o oa o `nom E- Dacn wes QC8 op Q- aUi. 2 2 cu a`Ni c m o aoi ° � 0 � � 3 a) �' o o °xcU) r- CL ° c CL cu cNu of O ° O aa) �� oo � c°)o ox acu:3M4- 0U 2n(n�ti �.CUcn (Dal a) = � W p Z N m — N o � N E cn N U 0 W cn 64 — 6E - oZ°(D O ° U i = CU - N U �L c U))a) v v = p cu U cn cuQ(n -a4- EOE 3 N C) t L >+ c — a) — O 0 N N cu p ++ a) a) N X 0 „ N = O C c N a) �. N •� p u) O J ui .= O= N .. O ��•� 3 cu U) O O L. ..a)E. E aa) a°))in L (AU uvi O c"u E IL °a)cu3 >�E c: U) Oa)C)- )- �m a)o °=ami n nN U) m---¢ca�N c° Vasc a) —caa)Q o01°} (nc�i A)?: c 3 c>u n o c U.4U) c U� o oma. o 0 cu cnoas E O m >o �— c me 0E3= �cvcnUcu Eck' CN Mo= ca aa)) m � = c) U) ��S (n 3F- U E Zn 0 U o N N fu � LO E r cn ++ N 0 m Lx W N Lo c L6 U O 3 coL V > a) D a) Cce) cn L a) cu E te a) CL O-0cn c— a) c (n > Nom~ (n U. =N cn w _ d% co E 6 - Cf) COM d N V �My CN N NDN ' 04 N �M N NN �Mik NN �M NN IL O a) a) �, — xs Q to a) a) a) a) U () a) a) U a) ? a) J D).n � CL ° rn -0 CL rn-Q d� cm -0.o a�a °)� o CL�a L) co N N N M 1-3 0 c c m -v C o C c° C a O -o 'P C a o 70 d m CMS _ __�'fo E > _ m _, � __=0`° m 0) a� N c Oro '° = o m 0 o m N c 0� � � N cos '( p CU CL) o � :� a� ma (n - C I :N a) mp E -0 c o a) E a E•N E aa)O oa E aa)U a E'w E Q)CLa' v E•(n E = N m + m L EO o c°j m� :+ (n v� ca EO �� p +•� m L EO o 0 m m +' coo L 0 o 0 �cn �U v �' �� (n(n0 �U) �U v �' �(A �U 0 L N cn a)= rna a) co 0 C C 3 0 m cn o C �?'m E 42 E 0�"ComL 3000 0 �tcnCUo . co U aa) 0 ca) O E tam) N= '� 0 a� a a) y t a) O- .E _L m m: 70 W � a a) C O O °) C a) O Q �c J C '- 0 a0)coo Nola G1ci w Oa)C a) 0—cu -co x'30 a) :3 =) �`-� c NQmc`o N 0 >,U a �0 O X O O m m a) N 0 0 C I- a a) aD c) L .n Q ,�L.. m � H w (n O! Q - F- L� m H m O -.r-I- 0OOa to o a) -0 +. C °'Ca a) Co °(n O L a) 3 °} E ; 0 E� 6 a) O C @} O 00 + o° L C a C c 0 c �`- Z° C ,C 0 .O vYL a) o C/) 4) c 0 0 E cn c 0' fn V V a) — cp C c O = a) a).. = a) 0 a) U C O�L Ja)"`pcE ,, cn mt cam- 4--oc°O�' ., �>'cEo3 Q W Ems,-ma)�g mcn-°E:F-0 L o a) a �'= a) E O N v H '3 a=) O C m-- x a� '.- C V Z oma, N C m N O` cco V, E coo `o m m 0•cuj o "- E i' �•N.E OL o cn ° �' a) c m m fo w m E y o m °c�'`o �`p� o� 'vi o at-. a) O(D 0- = E a) E vn v US m O. -.- cn m m N .. O m E 0 a) a) Cl)L 4- m xco p -0 o c� > o 0 0 a� a a Jcn N 4aL m m N— ) C L N .. U CL .2 aEi-�� �_ cn 0 0 o � c� cco o cn s-- Coa � c a)� = asE our o o m Cl m �2� °� o c o m p �°aaam c a) C o Co 0 00a~ aa))m c a- Qo m co 0 0 n w m '' J ca m N oma- -CO) .E cu > N O m aa) ��� U)— m0 m m E a) m a) 3 E m �; '� 0}. N ,�- r- -j 0 a) a) 0— p �' N N ., o! > cn , 7 a) '' z m V- C U a) Z (n > N = 'r>-.. m m co U p L L a ° co N = m o � cn m L vi cn a) p a) a) C co O O ,� cri p O H O a) L N .. O 0 0 O EQc�� N a)0c0o C 3 5 ._ C a) O a) o coa)°a)a) N •C a) C_ = m t� c u .a) a) comoL} a) E..0 s a � . t) in c Q m a) cn '0 4-- - .0 a) y � °r° U W � �- � � in c,) O c U) a) N a) N J a) E a) cn O m a) E c p m; �+ cm EO OC a) O L N m m 0 C t m E cn ` — (n E p v a) .O c U a)=C O O J acN C co a) � 7 � N . N Cl) 0 > a m O C U +. C O cn b cn cn 0> EQL a) N V cog p) C L Q i - C Nc a) 06 N U) (n — a) c c c N N c Q: O > In a' L v LO N L W� CO LO O t C �++ VN (U Q = Q N=— fu �z� N CL (D N CL J rn Q m a) .? co Q) a' a w rn T c -°o M .- m I l O Q m 0 a) E m d C) L M Q co N * k 2 Z co co d Q M M M M 0 0 0 O C O L 0 m m m.CU) ami �c75 c m -o co L p Q N E CO m -cu a a) + .N E (n CL E N fl C U U cn o .'O a) L.+ OC L a) O +� m Gi (D UL N .> U) O mC 6C= Y - C o°3aC ooQm�-n"o�.c)o �mu m>. cncmn =�mmn Nl S v' rnOc'NU 5 a) cu 'a O COOa) mcn-0 m U a)m.3+ O QQ cn N O m a) m 'O N 0 4) °CQ a0 NO Um>Da. > m 01.0-42 O N cn rn o 0 C-0 c�0 U Q a) U N c C C U U .0 !n Q.0 n. " d E m m +L to to mp J .N to N LL E -0-0 ° Q m 75 m O o c L m m U O E a) N yp .N +� m -r- Oo t O N CO C 0 ) a) .L N 0 M m O C i L 'V 0 m .� M � j U) V) =m a):. o'c CY "0 ° c3c m a) ° Ea c a0i o ai= a) = a �' o CCcCU) (L)(cccuc0i rn° a) 3� o mm m �'- a �? c O O H `'_ LCV p L O c N U� d O cu U �_ _m 0 di 0 O C O vj 'C O - O L a) 3 E Q — m= bo f0 cep N .c 0- N 0 C U m mll l C C a) a) a) QO c 0-0 0 O O m m ,:N' _ w o U' a) E65 m c Q) N V 0 m N> a) Q C"= �� v�j O� �� Cf) 0 m NY�M mU�L U� Q N a)Z N O cojwN3 OL () UQ) cnmNcn -awe N V m m O N c E° rn� °°0ca)i.c �a c m >Q m o a) c m m a- .�� w OL. m — E c mn m o �° m,� cn mn a O mp j a) m O m >;3� rn -C v� c • m �? ` N to +- C N fB m.0 E v, mu �(A z U m Cl) mow' o a,a cm o, o c �, a m m ° �� ° °� "� E .. o S o.. a) cn .. oo� v m =Q m �' c o c �m a) ° O w �a c 0•S 0= N o m e a) ocyv m(D Epa m v_ t c} -��a)m�Qa)cna)��Cu- a)°cn� C���-o'~ )-0"t:as )cn_ rim cn 0 N 0 Q '` 0 3 N CU N X m V a a s N 3 N �mO�Qmum�j)j°� a)� LE0M m a) 4) mQ�Qt•...�a? E ca fn2 N E c _ () c m 0 H 0 C C c`0 O a) Q a) +- E L. 3 . L 'c m L C 0 X 0 M O Q 00 Z= ._ . m a) c. m Q* col � m U 0 N L O N m 0 Y m N N N a) m m� cu U 2 C 3 U Q m >N > O > c cn y m O O N N Cu Z — Q) m a) C o 3 3 0 `00 v� � w o o +' c a) c +� Z3 co +- V) U U aa) E o o m moo a) c m c E w a N a) N a) c`u i O a -0 m -O cn m m � M a) o f opo O 4) -a c 0 (j O 12 a) a) m a) Q) "O " O O O) o Cu L m c i a) -Q N O Q m E> a -E v) L a) OL c C .0 .O L ca c Cl) tti mU 0 0 .0 U ?' O) m E c c 00 m ° t° � mom° co a) c w mu a) m Z m, a � �'E 6 0 E c � o aNi �� �v L cn N m� w .S a) m N +. N mp O o O cu '0 Q O 0 p ° m U U) a) m cu c N Q co m N ti U) a m 33� O co N E-0 Lp U 'cp N m ?� N .N to m o ° � cp �N m 0,Q\CCC m p'= cn (a N m (ni N Q� a) N� m Q 0 O C L� O C U, cn C C +- Q N U Q E L• N 3• U) >• N • 0 L Q Z cp ■ ■ _ N r_ C OC6 Mx LL C V M a) ?= c am.o doDUv°i M M C LO 0 �m C C d c_ C C n N O E mMoCh �v _CL E c•�-'E =EE o v�.N� H ��EE aEi> S; C30 aE° mcE° °EQ�a Cn —N 0a) CL U) 0a) pox ca s F U� I- U a) m w a) rn 0 a) a `'v (0• -Co c= CuOcn E0 =m d w`��°Et o F- ca a) c YN .. ,, ° Y) O _ p >, E r -C -- -0 a C QM P Co m= N C 0 p = p C � r�. C O Cu .- I 0 a)a) 0 Cf) m +a) U) o�'ca°a°i�E oov°�M0r-°o Mn �.� vi�.� 2.0:2 C 3 -0 m o-cun.0 0 (n ` N o LU _ -0 N m 3 0 Cn ~ } -'3 a) a) (D 0- 0 Q Ui C p >� � Com= Q a)U) L p Ca C a) U) (A C 7 N V d L rn •N a) Y rn Y t a) fA >ao 4 _`_ ��.L. N Com Co a) a) +- 2 N C r- O a) d W= a) m fa �� C w �Q N~ a) -0. Y OU'p � a '_ O Eb m c N N O Y d .N >_ G U W c 3 0� ca in �a ca c U a` Co>,cLa � a a) a) a) > H C = O Cu O M. o� a) r >_ v w 0 a) L- O Q Lu Lu N o N o or axiom CL � �� _ 0 - �� m ca oY C: L 3-C o L 3 o 3 ac): �� �w a) �? �Q c� >a _ N N� 3�a O Cl)� CU gQ .0 c Y C� �- ca Y O > —M) = _ E Q Y fa a) t a) U) a) t o ca .v J C= � ca � CU «. o a Cu to N a) C > o E fa +_ 0= o -r-m 2 cam- ,. _ � o O N Co LU Z U) N U) N LLI N-0 U) U NCo rN Cl) C C U > N ° C O 7 N C a) O 0 0 O Y V a) O� O N N N O O° 2 C N = U t6 c a) a) N o £ * �*��0-0 c) cam F- .0 U)) 3 m C/) Ca Y a) �` (I)= 00 O_ C — _ (0 (� N O` >' Y .0Q a) N N a) a)C >' C N Nim fn 0 -0 a) -Y c N Q- - O a) W O ca ca Y Cu p w U) a) ca a) �c 3a)c�,O� a _ �� a)W a)fA >+v Co a) N-0a)wCN26V;0 U _ cn cA J a'c rn cu B > � .-W � � ca a)Q W �O _ a) a) - U o'Cp v) p.9 p 3 Z +a`?M W 21) c_ .0•> co ° _ 3 rno a) c N ° a) N ° 3 Y C O c ='mom ai N 3 �b�-�� N � N Cn CV + - N W CD fn 0) a) : Ca O ca a) ��, N 0 ` } vi Q 2 C e N-0(/) JQ-CL E a) a) N YY OL fa N N Q ■ Z Q� M N d d-0 N H CT C d d > p M V Co Cr) Q '� C ao M M N C LO Q a N aw ON O CL d N � � O L d .N C d d L CL O U "5;m SOW UL'' O—Z cn O .. C c C coo O Oy OC UC a)a) d O a) a) a) m CM'O Z,p (D c C m m — a a > 'C c +.r a) U w> rn > U) : c Co a) c 0t 0 U a c m �U c 'A N c a) 0 E (0 E C O L 0 c 'U) e4 O �Lm� o 0 0 0a 0- m w� 0 m N U cn E Ups E u) a) a) o a) m U = fin. ++ C p cti a) a) 00 0) a) a- N ami a• v .. L m ono a)Ea)o"�_� o E Z N o cock E N N :D ,� co to U) I- v0) o o o ++ L C L m � ~U U o «- U� o� 3 u.na ++ m m �H � U)U))0 co c a) c a) Y- to m.X U = o:3 N c C c U - 0A) Z 0� o-0 � o wU com.L �, o��- a oU _)ca=ov)� vCL 0 �v Ev. E O a)C m o a) -r- m E a) 6 L d � co a) � c a) w (nom. 0 c a) m O +U� Cu 2 on. LU m C cn m N C N m L m N L C N (/) �' m U 7 C c Co U w 3 m Z� C 0 m` -::;m a)Q �F- w v5 o p a)ti m mom �° � �tirnvc ZU mom, N a)a)'a o� o N.`Qp a)m E mm N a) m a) a o=(n m O U) -0 >�O0 pa)'- �2m —INE0LC +rUU� ) U ' a a) O m c'> 0� n a) m w �y 0 P" - (D () = L m a) o f �- a) m LL Z a)cn a) v) > p a) a) a F- a) Q •C � ao m a y > a) o~ a 0 .� u) c rn N u) m a m d anivoi�0 `�°�mrLmo 0-0— m 0 to +� a) 3 c �ami0camm��m a) '= a) O L m ` 3�oo° aim 0 OL V CU •� m Q O C NY C++ a)L O 0O to 7 >L N C a) p` O"C7 -Q_ > �' �O c � cn'i>•C a) O O O >_ 4-- 3 a) c 'co C m '— 7co N L N a) a) C d N" M U a) a) m +. y C Lim c9 a) cn N a) aa)) 3 m `m •O �i °) ,� L m cy �� L a) �o m� c 0 O c o ami ca- a)� n> >, O C L m E N - 0-c I- m e ani L F- a) .v- 0LLw ? E 3 0= c.� m m 0'— W �'��z O• V U O e0 N CQ Q. >� m E Q) Q�'�(7 a- co Nc/) m.� w c > +. W m M O w O 0 ++ :3U C rn3„ 0 c c F- 0 a) (U a) m C >, 'D L C� = 'O LL O +• >c�a�m3 00 L — coo=c a`ni U fld' cn `.� — a) m'3 C O a)0 +- O o X( 'mow O L 0E- (1� m 0 _ 0 o am 0(na).3E� mU' O- U 3 0 C cLw mC m ,� rOamm0 j,C U 0 > 0 j- m p o mti m N U o m o 0 p U a) :3 m m to c' c E CU0) CU e :v 3 a) -0 > a) C a_ U O O O (A U-0 c�Q F- o m� m Z C _ C% � r � > O r .0 M CU v c.;) M W C1 4 d O ()a) a) - U () J 0) :E '- cn aH3:�-o 0) a M � A >,m �,c c 0 mo a o a) c co rn ., w d > Ea o c o ° co 0 ++ O eC Q -0 O p '� a) a) cco 'in -a c.rn� � c) c 'rn ` a) �N_ NrnpE }' CL LAn .0..N E E ° a E cc a) d C 7cu c m E 0 cv E �U m L� a) E (n CF`- U) V) C 3U ~U v E c:5 0 w d CO c O =C CO O 0`oCn a) LCD C = N Z N h- U a) (DVE —Cu "N� a) a ` Q a) O a) O �.� z Q� ` O 6 � fn EllC C N a .+ c ° 3 N E U O w O N C c v o o _ a) a) CL a) — Q c n a) -0-o E U° Z'ns O U� m cam m Cu E �L a) 3 c ° O 0 rn� co o N .0 d °• a) U) Cu m c o c a) c (n— O E O O a) p o°° m m e c ° b c Eca a m `� 2QE`Q�`a)pv>a 0 �} c ,c v �_ o° 0) at. a) c)�} co -a c E �} m� a 7. o` o o U o m,� p C p a c C O m mt ` o c m E muj N QE tpcl E °�,U °° v) 0 v vi > N O O m y a) c v m m O 7 i NY m -a L O O'` .= U� =i .3 rnE rn CuL C E c C c U a) O 'Q m v) a _U v m in O to a) m to > .` 7> m a Q -0 p -c C �- N a) C U L fn N L C a) w >, c +� U� fn U Q N (q N` L ° CL v > E— °-5Ur .X O c 3} a) c m a�.5�. °Nom Q C C U) ° . mL ��a) C J U «_+ O .-. > N fn �� a) fn N = Q V I P O L c r a) c m c: m E p c .. c c } c 4) - - .O Q 0 3 a c 0 0 0 a) U Ca E '- 'c -a - a) C c CL _ CU > .�, % a) .- a) O C - CD p ° ami o ` U) r C m a) a �. v, a) Q. 0 >O N C¢ .E m to C m - N U ° C fn a) a a) 3 vi U E � c a>i EQ �,.,,« OI° ,°n N o� � � CU(D c Q°(L) �. aim (n CL) L) o ` o Cl) mca� Q. m,,_> � c myc m v` c �?v�°°w o a)— m w m c w E a) a c c vim a >; � L CO �— ° m E rn� a) a) �a>•m �� L C E a) XYw- a) a) rnEc a) C m C cv>>a) p m L c 0 m r 00 m y N°'n O L v) N C O u) O C .� C LmQ�=a)a)a)c)�m C 4 03a m 7 a) c E N X L r.� c°)� 3 °U� 3 O a) c 0—a)-0 O a m c b a u)�U O" ` v a C N Z O O c O m p +' c mU)b ao F- d O U C n > rn m Cl) a) O a —0 o f �: �-S 2 2 a c m° m °o Y L ._ U E u� a) Q) y m rn O Cu m tm a) O O a) +_� C� -a C c O 0 c V v) O c 8-�ma) O 7 c L LU C a) to v) .' O v) to t Q° v) Ln .V Ea v' U QE tmE— a) 0 a) m cCL o .2� ani a) cc'o a) a m Cn Na�a)a) C pQ c° V) a� Eosc�'a)Ea) w >, V U m O v1 a) N C o a L v' °� CO� c� O cQ° N Q a E �� > m0�- JU o Q DovE��o owcL0�OL V a C Cu O Cu -0 �a a) ca) E �_ a) U) Q j 0 C E cm).E J r. U L c 6 a) L C Q w CL w O Q.0 LO L C7 In a �0 3 L} a) U) a)'=t.2Y v� 0 o o m 0) CL cu cL ° >,p Y O c mLo C m CO a) V C) rnZ N CO > a)� rnE a) rna) o a a� 0)— O.L.+ •� C -a .... i C> — .0 O a) C C oY a) d> a) 0)c c a) a2 is X o `n 0 a) (D U cc Q. Cuo Ca SOH E v E. c`o av'i v.�2 w� iw a) G1 r- L a) Z V " N Cu - > U) c I- O a)o-CM a)°�° ...I cm tmQ U U CO CL U Q d J m N - IT C O � O >+ m CO d� e� o CL CL c � _cn L w0 r tm t o N � � V C O N a) n 'O U O` '� C 3 a) 0 O a) .CJ cn O U cu C m O ++ a) .2 m O 2C C Q a) c a) c �O E C O o O Ucn U 3� U a) L C -C m - N (D O E N N a) C_ . 3.N Esc•- a) t L rnv 3 "� U (D N+J U U .cn m ° r C .Z cn N C m +� -p a) N_ .E J C 0c N C E 0 C c (Up O > m U -0 `} '� cn O m a) w .� Q 3 cn C E c c a m +) X - m Q c.`+� N 3 O c 0 cn O a) U m O d O = m O C 3�cow3�. a) .. U O cL N' o C 0 (� a) c E 3 a) 0 c 3 p m 3 +_ � °(ncna)ocn H > O C a N a Nc c m `�° E vi ° E: m Z n E } �- v U o >_ m °�� cud E o E c� ° ,, m. > Z 3 ° 3 c .� 3 O m Q o m U N s N N m O U U to O C` m 0 r' m � C +- C p m O in- Q O a a) c U= .N a) U +_ O U con cn .0 . t_ O Co U L CL O m cn y �0`OL ton � m CO .m mpmE E p C 3 Q .� O" a) a) O a+ a) X+•Otompv,y O �c �- Co C : .� fn t N° cc3 0 I-- U O p a)�c 0 m -0 0 to a) m• U ° , , .,_ � a) ° c p O p N U i0 �� p a) '' U a) m E a) p U a) cn 3 a) U U U .D ` -. o . c O o N N I- m N t u) vi ° N 3t c +- O :. (n�c Q) N m E E` 0 - c c r 0 a) v N Q O r c cp m U 5 U ~ O U c C a) E -r- m p �. C p p p •0 C v N C t0 N N O cn j U C U C~ - a) m b C O 3 0 a) E C a' N m C 0 ci L cn N N o C 0 fn a) a) E p 3 o o c0 U E o c' a) a) CY C a) O 4) U) U W p° 3 C E c 0 ai C V O C C O= O U o r- - ° N ,C � +_' a E N a) 3 a) E 3 o c� U c0 a E E .N - `—° 0c � E .t. - >'ZU O O U c p N c0 3 .0 Z c a) O 3 O O o N c c O ._ v O c` o a) m m ,n �. .0 Z O a) m 0 _ cn — C O V 0 o� ami 3 c 3 O 3 a) 0 �LL E•� 0 3 ° 1 0Q"O m Q.- N U"° mU rn m� m Of- cn cn m= m m C C U a cn co >+ N o O a) O N U .O� U a m Com' ° m N o �o o cn 3 aa)) o 3 �j U .X •� N p a) :3.- -= O` L 3 a) C M(0 o o a) "O m Z C „_. 3 c a) Cl) • V >, CO " cn �- a) a) o U CL N U U a) p a) � N (�0 p O `O Q C N Q p C N a) 4 ai C E U•E p Um D N'�uci O f0 3 p a) o U) m O+J� L Xw � ``�._t� a) �o O E U_ `O a) c`0 (0-0 a) m ) .0 a+ O U w C f0 a) O aL U a p 3 �. Z N° C) N V 3` >o V U 3m3 --aa) 0�)v°,wY�No c N a) '3 -0 C J �j N 1 m Q C C- O s 0 w U C >. 7 V O 3> m(D 00 3 0 -0 .0 m C Cj U c c N m •a+ U) L a) 00 N x cn > C)- U U cn fn c 'a 3 ° H Q U O N L C- 0 ami a) opo E o X C_ C to U-) in m fn C v U a) a) d ..+ C C a " 0 J � O M � N c .O N 0 & �(D 0 L. $ Z F- @ > .� c @ � 2 CL E 0 U % �lc � I \ 2 E2 2 0cE 7g c� 2cclmE k/ /// @ Ia a I� o c tm o § �2 �a c cc 2� 0 -ca /=o E/R2k 2 w o: £ - 02 g f o 2E£�IO� 2% 2 . cu —2 o @ \ f o %$oa = kcn C'4 (n LO o® ƒt0-J0oa)T 2 � �_ 3LO r- @ § . cn� � \ / � � <�._ okk=�Oa § §k/�//�2§ CL 2� c 72kf�-C a) �.cr f CL /� M // k D c 2 0/ f/ c &�=:«=ac CY /- £ o 2 « z cu :3 c g ( @ f£ o%/ f§§\°%2f CY J _ cn 2 t� f 7 0.2 w 2 r— = c @ 2 m / 2 « c c o•- o = m k/ . . . //22�/$/2/fk &\a Z§/ k § & 2 w @ ° /forco %37ƒ22 7§%aƒ/ 3 Wa) 0 U X225-0% $ °§ «w�-o-59 m CL� @ w: in 3®2/< cnm 0 »/ES�'K �= q /$R <%2\eI C 'a o 0a 0 E � ? �lc a N O N O Q O N � = O H .N t (D I- CL Q E U o o Am /a�./\• Y Y oc U) E YcU c Q +�o R + �Ym �cc oLc � o �c �o Cc0o c OL c cu Q-om_ c°c'NE o_ �cN -c -tc.N -ao mw("DE ;+_� fl.�a ., a a'Ea E o c E O•c E �U (L L-E C N 3 N E p O Y Y p L p C U cU c f° E +, c`U a O N c E :_. 3 ca O ,N N E N p +_ Ca L p c U 3U �U 0 SH cnaSU COFU Scn U 0 w E c 0 3 c �� >, Nr N c cv ��' d c «, cn NNcm ->mU cm 0= U EZ 3 0 E rn � cn m ac Gi V a U C� N O U_ N >, E m U Z O 7 U 3 0 D o N.` `mom �' 0 zU z c C. U�>Q hL- E 3° N n. L 7 0 O 3 7 ND N _ O _ Y 7 ` O .Q E N cU 75 N N Y V U N > N W Y Z tnU N N c C U N j .0 N 2 `.N n (OY Q N 0-04- E Nail Q V L cN c o ° U O 0 E.S� N �N N—Y(n�U)�UYo C> O C N O - N U .L+ N L U N O cn L N C j O v- O N L O rn +- +• (D ! p a tLn 7 N N U �c p N a>N, m� 43) N O c L OLcn E'N + N � cn CU C no aU LU 0v c U0 . N Q ca -0 Yo NLN c c— V Cp 00EC �N O r� s L) 3O L N me C -O U) E a)U c N ' 0 0 ?cn 75 (D Q 3C ' 3 ' •V 3Na d 3 yOa) p L C N N c -N 3 C c-0 N = 'V .d Cp`d ` p c M 0 c O 0:3 to o0 r E�� O N N U� U )C aU- �(�nLc Z NcN = coco O 0N= pN12 jc°c N aci m3aci cE ui°c N E H a ppN ca � > c oE O O Co- C �o c) -.;-- 0 ELNN O c p O- `O ' ON N fn' L b Y N 7 + Q (U '� N — �V)U 0- 51 U) -r- Q °c w-3m ami D) a Q N N c z N � O N O L 00 L U C) N Nt QO e- C C C p 00'' 4-1 L N c 1 0 4- 0 O c U N� Y y 3L N� O= cn C N N O� >, N U 0� O C0 cn N L N ZN E C O fnU -30 C N 0 N U) Qv cu (`p fU N O O L N U tmE N N O 7 U—c) cU N O ` +NCOti N N U) Y N N L N O .> N -p N N ti C N a) Q (D cn O w N— N 9,,U c a) ` ".EO E —0 O) "O N H C) 'a N � E toOL �n 0 E' C U O` _ c(D E> N a 7 U" EQ.S�I- t C L > U°r° c� a incy) 3 c0� 3 -Na C ` w y to rn C O N r N C N N r M N , c N J ,, co5Naa)) cac�° cQ'oo5 cc'v� aa -0 a� v v v 00 0 0 0 coo a o m a o civ a o N a: t C o L C c oL C C 0 L C y.+ O L C y` O L C cn ` p L C UO CL 7 N —C m a)E00 cv a)E(A0 0 cu a)E(n0 0 c Fv �j V N C Fv V N c i" �j cv (v ac L p C) L CU)a) 3 •n - U) 0^,N^' Q% /A��, W ` 0 Y a .� O U Y a W W Y > Y C) p i ()a)L, c�pmmcc a) 04- °ALN �� mCo0c N t ev LL N cv c (D.G E �YcOma)��`�0 >0>�a)cco E -- �, N~ Q.o U� o tea— m cu a) a) CO o rn�� p)0L E a ocn o a) ° a z� �� 3 mJz �� cn.�H --a- Ecn 2a.0- Co o a)civ3>=°)Om 0 L o O N o c ma) S C C a N N (YO (/J O O �.c- U ~ y 3 vcN cy Y 3 E m-0 L U) o C 'C U .0 a += C C L> U) (D 'N ,� 3 N a C d a) a'a co C a L O c cv ;�, C VJ ._ cn C E C o cv cn C 7 C to c' C cv cn (v a) N E ai o��+ a) a) E N OO a) EH N U cn N • N v +`. O a) U N E -2L 7 () in W ccnv a) u�cvc ,0 ° O O L�_c0 � � o civ a) 30 a) O aYNcv c cni 0 0 0 0 o o m 72 o m o m ,^ m o 'p 'p d U)a w U) c C.NM - rn a Lp U) C C N� �- rn a .. U) � C wM �- a)-0 U) C C w d t " c O- c c °t C 'c o c C c Os C 'Fn .r+ 0 ev 0. c 'in a) a (—°`na)E -0 C 'in ` a) � con°E Cin a) v cn°E .0 c ` a) cacna)E L �) a'E(D E a- Ev E a� a Ev E a E a E i Y s° C T O C U ° CU Y 6 O C O IV V2C C U. L 0 a U — C > C aj -a O U >. cn (mp .�.. - L co a) .0 0)N U 0 d c° y O > aE c ° �,(n-cv 0 °m�mcT�� Nz aci.Na��o Nc_Ti$pN� �'�Eo3a°i C ma) U) cn.'= >' .�_. O E U U +C O vNENmcNO m a�U NQaa))oa)a) �°°���°c a) aNLU�2)= E Mn �Y°F= HEcoo coca C°)3>aa))S.2 C� 3� - U cm) >,m� a °� aa)) ami c N ° c ° c 0 0 C a) Can 3 O C ccs (1) t_ o N O E (p O N m m U E� a) cn + ,- m Ma°O ���E �c� O ��`�° UO E a) cn L 3 v- > c a) E �co�• (9 L a) 'C C, L U U vi �. °° c>° C C a) -O O a) >, () 'a 'v O a) U �s (D'' a) ;v O E .� Z� C cmc..• c a) R) N m E w O O t C U m N — U �.3 a)a0 E N C1 N n '' N UC),) rn O a) m U) U T m- a) N C U a C O >,�m m O C Y w0NT-a) (o c v-• E m U v N C C -O O m ++ L CU a) .3 (o O N �' N 3 Q. c (n C N V N +- QU a) m w �-: a) cCl) co U 4 m-0 c cc N Cc cn U) c a a) c° cu U 8 c 0 a) Cn c N 0)a) O 2) rnE E� cu U)-0ai-a O �. O �. O C)• 3 ~ �;(n r O L) � C N •dam C N M E U C o c U w c`u rnm ° o cn 75 o—M c p CL U) ��•) ���c CU O E a) O E c � a) co �- a- � F- O a) H v`- a) _ rn a) in co N cn a) 5 N 3 C ,, O m 3 Y rn a c 0)o m o cn >, a) a) a) a) �3cma�_3 :3 O C .s -C U C (1))°moo a) — ._+ N C cn M c� O m -°�3aiN (o t E m .L (o a c C 0 LOa). (D U n 3 't' Z>,Ern•— U N mcn N m c c> rn-a m a) m Y(D U)'ccm Q. a) >, N a 42 p O v c ♦, dY c °)o U) c a) pm cu c: Co L. rn� o. ao a) 3 ,� vEi cCu m m (n >'c�`n umi °aa) 3� C mph c E L. c`o ())Z--, c`o a cn c. c co _��.� aci:- $.0 �-a E rn� ° oo x°)Eo a)� C "� 2 N ci cp NNx .0 a) c`o >,C>7ct—m rnp C.co L) 3 I—ca) °� () a)ma)Oa)a) =5 CL oc c � 3 0 me CUCM },�� a)o-o o N ° w c N 3 m m c°� U N o o> E C c 7 d -C •5 L 'x ° m O C m L U- U v N p C N C -a 'O OaC>OOa)°~NV 3c ° w E tOnCmvi.0 a°i m ° L" W Qa)Ncn E aa)aCa)Om ami c mc? m e C 0 Cl) O F c E °cm>o0 M C E 3 C c Y p U a) a f1� C c (o a) H (0 w �� U 2cnco>,,: E° H C .� .� O. �a)(D H C. > m Uca)U cnOa'cna) �- M O Q N N U CO .. 0 :N 0 a LO L rn rn rn CM J d (M C n C0 CL cD LO LO LO t�f) w, .� o ai O p p N N �+ m m v o coo o m o y„ c O L C C O L C C O r- 0 C ++ O C 'N ` a) c ` N -0 C co ` a) E CL �°Toc°�.cC:0 0 N c H U V N c U 0 N c ~ U UCL N 0 cn Z c `c �tc`v a) o c>> cN o >, cn CU M cn O c m rn m c>a c E N c ,m W cn X c o .N _ O O a) " > a) O E N a)co cn C c �� rna) N CU a.cn MV, cLo aa) �U p � m5 >, L L aU O+-• U U > H'U O E N U E al- N a) N mL� m a) m E L fn � ++ _ N C C `� c a) }, >, O cn p�� c(D 0a a) a) c'� �°E a) �T� a) C m c = — — c 'OI �- a) ANN a)O ma) a) , °ppba).,'��00 E NEa)+DN N� ) V"a 'p O a•.. a) Q1 C N c C C O +. 't+ +-. cn C m -p >, �- c +. m Q p O N• a) C N U N a) N m E E° c 'a _ _ N .� a +�•O ` L N �, 0 C U O j O C E 0 C C N +r' a) L a) O p > N v- C O O p)._ m +• W C m a) int N I c a) > .. a) O c E m N y U i m O m O > i a U Qp .a N -p N .— N w p N "E = a) N 0> can co cn "O m N •c U y c o a > N m c 3 � N c°) a) mU� c a).. c c tm>,E c m 0) >.vi N a) c a)— c � 0�- m m a) a)s a) O+, cU O C ca ` a O t� 0 3° E- E U OY `- U m m}. E� E o c Utz C. N D O C N a vi >, a) O LL -p 7—� U Z a— -2 a) a) p O O >, m N m 2 7 p +_ E O ,� 0 0 C +.•� a) O U L c U .p a 0 a)+, �� O C N C C C =` �=4 = pr N a) a)`� cn N.E=t O O � E d m CD'— vi U O > O a) ` E N a) ,� N N + , a) p p :) > "' O U a L a) - CL c" E 0 N m C E p c N O O « .^_� ,� c c m a) w E c �" a) >, �' U E� 0U a°)) m= o- E a) N cn 3 N .. cn oa �o = o ° U E :3.0 c >,�a;cmmL�3macif°�a°i�c°coaci���o (D Q) a)�a��i� y �� o1:5 "� a)� a>) E > �— N c°) c E:2 m E� ° FL- aN0 U o ., c -a 'D acv a) c a) a) - O > N E c a aE >>m N a) >, O- O W .m- w -a 5 mo O LO a) U N 3 O U N ~ m ui Hcna-C: iE=�mE>�v� a)c°)) cO :cm w-0>>, c coE.n-Q crime T 0'� cn cd 4°a cin �U civ c°v E CO) v m42- c°v oF--o ccv m a) a) a) rn — c c I 0 0 C: cn o v p m O p o cn 5)a) O a ��, (O N c O >, t cow c c c o� m s N>,0 N > m n rn O U+ O me C �. O 0 rn— +. N C > E c°i) c «• 3 vi E c E" 3 6 m c 0 �v N°� sE ocn cu aa) `m Vico o -0C'� a)m5 _ a) rn��'� o ° rnaci ° c ° S5 0 m� } c m vCL 0 a- _) c— E CL c v o E E L) a") �} N a)CDNr Np�m NCCmO)o `�a)vi V CY07 cl)) °? > n -maw a>) ° m- v c)E ° E °) Y m� C: N v -p mU�—[,-.o �_ A2 M- °= o >,0 c E2Y ° c N ��t c 3> Co UccwE �� 7 mENaa)) vp0CL - -0 C: O «-�ovicnN Nom"-oocn� ���oocn cn �cn �- C7 {�-y cin °ocUiEaci ��.�a>a) �mE�a)� ��uvi0 2 �. o mi a °S m -5v cd rnNvr m m ��� m F- (n'v U ✓`� C F- 0 o o m •- w Q O e. v ca) co ca) U')cn r a- O u) m a) CY)m rn U J dCC°o d(o {s LLo C LO CL N w O N L O C. d N c O .N t d L O U z 0 z y N O O O O _ �m m'v N o N O m "a O N -0 O d rn0 U) cC(nca U)0 U) cc.0a) rnv U) c(o rnv U) CCMca C O L C C O L C C O L C C o L C id OC ca C. 'y a) 0 0-a")E C N` (D a)u�OE C N` cu(noE C ` N cu Mn E +�CL aE79E a� aE:2E a� aEaE aEaE C co 0 E cn p N 0 E 0 p c0 a) E (n p N a) E (n p C H V O N c H V U N c H V 0 a) C F- U U N '3 ++ C C A2:Ea) a) a) c ` T 0 ca vi cu o o6�. N ` 0 o w- > o NE U % L°�'u� C N d 3 a) O C p U 0- m O UTO 43, 3 a � o c� (U a OO E~ > 0s '.. O rO Q p +CU OEL0 3OaY> a) N 0 U C N a) O C O L M w O w E a) p m CL a cp 0 H cu CL .> O` o I— rncu ° E U: cn a�'v,�.N �n a) N �I—� cv oaw E a) E L (n�C U a? E O O LNL �c U E CU. c yp N t 0 L(Nn cu �� la E m cl �>° o� :3 ��cu ��� o(ncvE5 CCa)NZ cn eco 23 O N (n a) C LO. m `° O(D N av; 3 N ca 4) 0 0 O N L � Y > N `� "= N ' ' C O N N C a) j C a� L 'FD c° U O o U Q (n N E U> No O > M o ``. « N a O O t ._ � •' b C-n.cwa E to a) O C co � a) a`) m (0 O E > N C. CO N E N — O E(D 3 E E L OL 3 CUa)E L L ,, Q a) O ��72 N C N t '�' N O C E �O -Y 8-2 c 0 L CL s�� �� n, > �0 c��oCo� o mt��. 3 CU) c> a0iaa))c°aa)) N3 �'•^'�Eaa))N cnCU CD Eo o O cD O0 OQ cc o 75 p a rn_c0 Z, 0-0 � Y S Cl) wa Q. U' -0o-0 L >' a) . 2 3 N O 0) 0X O c)) U C pp NO Ncn L a) O N O O N O LO > a CE Q C L ch Lr EOOQ mU Q) L O O i c O i (6 L 9-0 Lo w Cl) 3 �- o O a V 0 - a) a) > N �- rn I co ocn� 0. �a�rno � aa) 9 m�� aa) 3.�� >,� U� > ms o ao ° ami o L) �� E c� N ° o •cnr E Z aci o C a 3 ccpQ� O a0 E o ma 0 o N 0 C O N a CU 0 L O >,c 7 V a) a)Uc-0 N ca>�0rn,r NL +• c o N V E�-rn� c 72 U N N 3>, " O c = U p`3 3a) o f N O c_) 'sem - L N 00'U�N caC Se r �3�c EO.0 E'o N-� ~ aUi C o Z a) s (D L , C L a) " a) C> H Y f—(no 3 U C 3 �.�Eo a) O Q a 0) c N U E o C 00 a) c0.`U N p 00 a) OL Q) a _ p) > U a L O �. O W w a) , c '' O� C a) O j, O N a) ^ a) co (00 0) H 0-0 (6 N 3 L v- cM Z aD N X a) F- a N E a) F- (n + C (n a) N f� — 3 a— M oD M C _0 � ' G1 tm -Wm cM - cfi r C 00 �— L6 C -0 W v cn cn a) cn -0 a) c d 0 a) () a) a) C o 0 m J N a- cc) N a) C a.0 m c0 N am N a) O O a-0—� � � N sLO a. C4 ON �Q O Q N , O L Q �N C s m L CL E U N N c O c O c O An N An Am o E E(n E(n c o c o c O m -p U E IE E s E L cn cn cn d 0— C Q) c a) U U O 0 Y C M U O 0 Y C O U O U) CC E (n C fn (n C (A ar Y .. rno '(n rn6� 'C � rn� = E m E E ev CL J -0 .S v "C C C C .. S -0 C C .c-0 .. '(n -0 .c C C o Q V "O o .0 V c "O 070 b U C 'O baa) Y —cu 0EO C coc)Ea NUE a) c'E � cE r- 'C cA �E 'E a) aOEa) a0E •EE o EE O EE o E a Tu f O c 0 '—E O 7 .Sg O c 0 c A O c 0 L -0 U c C 0 N () 7 C U a) 7 c U a) � U � Fva K H-6 t;G 2 aW U) a� cn aw Un d Y U E o 0M N H� C a) Y ' 0CL ` N E C Y °?cno L U C p o cr- c Y a)Q cn c oo C U Y E a) 0 a) a) Y �a)Eo3Eam� s c=am H W a0iaCL c O� U E O O U 0 N 0 O U c N a) O O O N 0 c L 0 CU o (D ,rn -0 .2 .c E o-aY E-o�LO U O� C o N E O cn LL N N `� N >' Q L ate) � +0. cn N N N a) Y M O E '' C p �(D M o c`n C C Y oY r E L 'C 0 0 -00 O O a) O U N O d >, U 3�c E cn � o c'c o o °? ��EoF - N O 0 (0 t E v O 0 0 aY U) c E U C) a c n` fn c U U O O U) U U N j U Ea) t N a 0 7 0 0 0 Q Hc�ccvHvv�Yco)coi3co)HcoiLo °coi— [cLn z w M- a) > c j m.N a) Y N fn Q �� Q O O a) C O O Y E a) a)" i- o LO o� Q -+ d c c > o •c m cnE �w a) o o a L :3a) c cn n c E U o w U— U N c o O v Q O CL CU c 0 (n a) a> >. U c 3: CU U yHo mo °o- o �.0 O E o O ` 7 N O 3 U Q o> 3 � ce— -1 n U ca io O o� E ` - c (D v c o W Y Y O a) C C .> c L ` •� r- B� UJ C O C Y w VNO U :� Y N C O L? a) cn cn O (A .E Z L E a) 0 v r--. Fn c 0 C) O � C O o U) C N Y C) 'T Y U) ,� fn 3or Q 2 Uc O T Y 0 }, C 00 0 cn (D- O Eo IL O O w c 0 M co O O> a) E 0 U 0 N o oQ ?> � o E >>,Co ~ o oL� � E vSN a)�C:-" �- a� Y o .04 0 c Q o o a cMUOU a) a) Y° c°E � i rn0 o0 awo - Ucm 0 (D cco° ooo c a) aa) 0 3 D 0 m� 2 a) a) U) 3 Y O O) O X> 0 LL< O 7 c L U.�v m N a) L Y- a) . V p j V1L C) 0 O O O U=._ X22 cn U) CLU) UCDU) D 3N U) U U NO N N (p ^ N 0 N E>_, N N NQ) Q) (D F N LL 7 :3 7 E �— 7 >_, E 7— 7 >, E 7=:3 Zrn LL LL 0 LL LM am O LL rn0 O LL rn0—Ij O LL # N M It —T LOc0 I� 1 (O VJ (O (O co (O N N C LO O O O C U) O F 2 �, 1 O E EO �_ c EL_� EL EL U E,_ to Uc V c U c rn U U c E Q m f0 O O cm -0 m O O rnv ,� N O O rna} c Y o •• c � a a3 O O cn ��� ;_ E cm c ) >, c c (n >, c c N� >, c .. ami - c v,a >, o c c m coo C c -0 c0a)L C c COOL++ - p c om a) �o c C c m coo U O O m a mvE a covE.O a c0vE-0c a �- o p E a) E a) 0 E a) o E N a) o E a) oa a) E a) CL f � o N a) c Q a) c Q cc a) C= Q m cc O .'i*. - cu E :te ° N a) C= Q 0 C U cu O 7 f--0 O C i"--0 O c U cnU) c —U c F-� O v afy m O N C a) O C c N Y a)— -p cm - 'N M E N a) O a) � a t Z O O C E s c) O-0 � FO- U N C C a) O N a)L_ �� a) O.0 Oa=.0� a) �, =- cn a) >O �L -0 cu C O a) a) t O y o C cn N C m = U c N 0 Y C Q U U �c� a) E O H H 0- O L c (n t0 cn o.� E ° = N E'` 064 U Z a) G O O o a'� N 'N v c Z a'(n a) _ E N C H O p Q a CU 4) N jR u � 0 CD_ a) i V7 C L O O CU � E m Ufn >+ i »-� a) a) a) j N a) `' L E N O C L a a) c0 Y T co � acm. U O OU Cm O U m a)° a) c U N C O c a) -0 J .L+ N o N O a) C a) p N N a) C `Q 'p c0 U N N C ++ O 0 W N L N a) c a) O Y U Y L I— Q- L Q i L H C O U L QU L CB .,,, a) ,L > H.0 m U> L' tU HMd a L L O (0 H .CZ J a) Y N U >, ` a E O 0) 0 Q '2W C E ° co) a) o t C) U')— U N co w "J c ` Q N O > N o � E � � E w m 0.d co c m co w N �n3 -0 of as rn cn mC ani U W Y �a O N `- O LU Y '0 0O (� N a) � a J O •- +� N U L •�- Y a) Z p NE oaa)) c co cL > �� a) Uo a ami �m �o (D 4) c� N m c O Q.9 L N � c L �-" gco �- o a m a) a� O (o cu 3 c a) N a) 3) 7 3` *k O O L E Q O L +- 0 D N Cn W a aL+ U)o 0 c C C: N cu `7 E> r E> - M c?�> c?� U N N N a) :- N� 0 C N a) >O Co N CO N M c) U i 7 m M U N m O Q E 7 `: O Q n. a) Q a a) 7 3O 7 30 7 j U mSID CM Etw LL W EQ LC.� Q U- Cf) U - U -m Z CO CO rn CO C) r- N r- M ti ti M N PIT #7 City of Auburn Transportation Plan 2005. Incorporate the City of Auburn Transportation Plan 2005 as an element of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. IN +E � ttach ed is fi� :2`revis�on ma Y to the draft Cocmprehense'rnpolh'Pr� (the ,{ d version provided. pr v[ousl It City Cow cil},°'k�}�z Copi ,0f4t TWe%Me%V%ro% � �+� i�=s � �ps•�i�•��I�t��o �nr.:..ra�rrot�r !' { �: �/��y1 V 1 LM ■ V ■ 1 ■ • ira 4 • 'vs T; v va: v. ■ qw.•w■i fro , p,t � City Clerks C"ce. P/T #8 Miscellaneous Policy/Text amendments to various plan chapters CHAPTER 1 PLAN BACKGROUND Introduction Auburn's Comprehensive Plan unfolds as several layers of background, data, policies and plans set the direction to the future. While the Growth Management Act, Vision 2020, and the King and Pierce County Planning Policies provide an overall framework for the plan; the foundation of the Plan exists in the aspirations of the people whom it will affect. History From its beginnings, Auburn was a crossroads. Tribal groups such as the Skopamish, Smalhkamish, and Stkamish lived along the Green and White/Stuck Rivers. They forged trails over the Cascade Mountains, traded with tribes living east of the mountains and canoed down river to gather shellfish and trade with coastal tribes. The 1800s In the mid -1800's, the first pioneers arrived in the White River Valley lured by the free and fertile land. In 1856 and 1857, a series of clashes occurred between the Indians who had long inhabited the area and the newly arrived settlers. The Point Elliott and Medicine Creek Treaties were signed which eventually resulted in the establishment of the Muckleshoot Reservation and recognized the Tribe's rights to off -reservation resources. Railroads reached the area in the 1880's and brought adventurers from the East and Midwest United States, as well as Europe and Asia. Early farmers, many emigrants from Europe and Japan, tilled the rich soil and planted hops and other crops. The harvests were abundant and soon the White River Valley became one of the prime agricultural centers in the region. In 1891, the future City of Auburn incorporated as the Town of Slaughter, named in honor of Lieutenant Slaughter who was killed in the Indian Wars. The name did not remain for long. The State legislature passed a bill on February 21, 1893, which changed the town's name to Auburn. A number of stories exist as to the name's origin with the most romantic concerning a reference to the first line of Oliver Goldsmith's 1770 poem, The Deserted Village: "Sweet Auburn! Loveliest village of the plain." In 1895, Auburn's population was approximately 300 people. Page 1-1 r Chapter 1 GOAL 11. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT To provide for, establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that respond to local and regional needs and enhance the City's image through optimal siting and location:_ while taking into consideration tax policy impacts of streamlined sales tax and/or other similar legislation. Discussion: The Auburn area has historically been a good location for industrial uses due to the ease of access provided by the railroads and by its location near several major highways. Auburn recognizes the important role industry plays in providing tax revenue and employment opportunities to the residents of Auburn and the region. The City seeks to diversify the types of businesses and industries located here to ensure that the local economy is independent of the ups and downs of any given industry. Further, since much of the City's industrial land is located in highly visible areas, it is extremely crucial that these facilities be well designed and sited. For many, these facilities provide a first impression of Auburn as they pass through the area. However, land made available for industrial development shall take into consideration impacts of tax policy and tax structure upon the City of Auburn. A discussion of issues and policies related to this goal can be found in Chapter 3: Land Use. GOAL 12. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT To encourage redevelopment of underutilized areas to reduce sprawl and take full advantage of the City's investment in existing infrastructure. Discussion: There is already a large area served by a comprehensive network of infrastructure both within and adjacent to the City limits. The provision of this network has required a significant investment of money and resources. Within this area, there is significant acreage of underutilized land. The City seeks to encourage development and redevelopment of these parcels, particularly in the downtown area to fully utilize this investment. Page 1-26 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE - Introduction Land use planning enables the City of Auburn to manage its anticipated growth and development while taking into consideration the specific community vision and desires. By designating how land can be used, those considerations necessary for orderly growth including the creation of jobs, the provision of recreational opportunities, strong and stable neighborhoods and an efficient transportation system can be pursued. Auburn Today To better understand and evaluate the context for the City's future growth, it is helpful to evaluate the City's existing land use and zoning. Figure 3.1 provides an overview of the zoned acreage within the City of Auburn and the percentage that acreage represents of the City's overall land area. Land zoned for residential purposes, especially single family residential, is clearly predominant and represents about 40 percent (RR, RS, R1 and R2 zones) of the City's zoned acreage. Of commercial and industrial zoned land, the M1 (Light Industrial) zone is most predominant, consisting of almost 15 percent of the zoned acreage in the city. Land zoned P 1 (Public) is another significant land use zone consisting of almost ten percent of the city's zoned acreage. Page 3-1 Chapter 3 other religious institutions, or moderate density multiple family uses. LU -71 Newly developed arterials shall incorporate design features, and development of adjacent land shall be managed such that creation of new commercial strips is avoided. Land division regulations shall result in single family residences being oriented away from the arterial, with access provided by a non - arterial street. LU -72 Commercial strip development along Auburn Way South should be limited to north of the R Street overpass. LU -73 The City should develop design standards and guidelines for development along arterials to improve, their visual appearance. The Regional SuperMall The development of the "SuperMall of the Great Northwest on 155 acres near the junction of SR167 and SR18 in the 1990's has led to a "destination" mall attracting consumers from long distances. During the Mall's development review a number of issues were raised. Included in these issues were the impacts of the SuperMall on Auburn Downtown and the possibility of commercial sprawl around the SuperMall that would exacerbate impacts to the Downtown and traffic around the SuperMall. Since that time, several factors have chanced. Auburn's Downtown. as a designated urban center, has developed a more specific vision for the community. Also it is not expected that the SuperMall will develop to its maximum square footage, and the possibility of streamlined sales tax legislation makes retail commercial uses a more imvortant local overnment revenue source. The City should continue its commitment to the SuperMall's development as a regional attraction, and take advantage of the SuperMall's presence to complement strategies related to downtown preservation and development Objective 9.3. To capture the retail market of customers visiting the SuperMall and strengthen Auburn's role as a major retail commercial center for the region. Page 3-28 Land Use Policies: LU -74 Support commercial development around the SWerMall that complements its role as a regional shopping center lienal anm ner-ei 1 development o + f land +1. S 11d 11 shall 1. v Yall designafiFlnand --end g exil3g-(or- a possible --rezene--te lousiness parkdesignation) allow for -e6 Preial-uses. —nom development must meet the folio-Aing • a. if the new development is en industfially zened pfepeft�-, the de vV of V.,,1.1111V11nt shall b limited + fl , + f t of , ethm�e -•e-g--m6tels,—o limited ;„s+„„ees -�- ���..-..11LVJ oziierrooiiipicriicn and , rAy if the •a + l a b uses aRthe a + + anethef use en the b. Small,ndividual disraeufaged. site. d de. elepffients af e- LU -75 The City will oppose the development of a regional shopping center in the unincorporated areas in the vicinity of the city. LU -76 The City will seek ways to draw customers from the SuperMall into the downtown and other areas within the city. LU -77 The City shall continue to recognize and support the development of downtown Auburn as a focal point of the Auburn community. Downtown Auburn Downtowns have historically served as the business, cultural and governmental focal points of their communities. In many communities like Auburn this role has been challenged by new shopping patterns focused on regional malls and commercial areas outside of the downtown. Maintaining a healthy and vital downtown Auburn continues to be important as it is recognized by residents as a focal point of the community and an important element of the City's identity. In May 2001, the Auburn City Council adopted the Auburn Downtown Plan. The Auburn Downtown Plan is the City's updated strategy to Page 3-29 Chapter 3 LU -99 The City shall continue to support the redevelopment efforts of the private sector in the downtown area. Industrial Development Auburn's industrial land and the development that it supports accounts for a significant percentage of the City's tax base. It also provides a large number of jobs to both city and regional residents. Good industrial land is a limited resource and should be fully utilized to maximize its potential benefits. Industrial development typically utilizes extensive amounts of land and is typically located near major transportation facilities. For these reasons, industrial activities are often quite visible. For people traveling on SR167, industrial development is the primary view they have of Auburn. Streamlined Sales Tax leeislation would, however, chanve the tax structure within the state and has specific consequences for industrial warehouse and distribution cities such as AuburnIn response to the State's consideration of such legislation the Auburn City Council approved Resolution No. 3782 in November 2004. Resolution No. 3782 outlines an approach and actions the City will take related to land use planning_ zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax proposal or other similar proposals that change the tax structure are adopted. Included in this resolution is direction to consider amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning codes to reevaluate the existing industrial land use designations and patterns in the C GOAL 11. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT To provide for, establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that respond to local and regional needs and enhance the city's image through optimal siting and location,_ taking into consideration tax policimpacts of streamlined sales tax and/or other similar legislation. Type of Industrial Uses There is a wide variety of possible industrial uses that could be sited in Auburn. As with the mix of residential uses, the mix of industry also affects the image of the city. The regional image of the city is that of an industrial suburb with an emphasis on heavy industry. This image is quite apparent as one travels along Highway 167 where there is an almost unending view of high -bay warehouse buildings. Page 3-36 Chapter 3 codes and performance standards which govern industrial development to implement this policy. a. Procedures shall be established to ensure aesthetically pleasing building and site design in areas designated for light industrial areas. b. Appropriate landscaping and site development standards shall regulate site development in heavy industrial areas. c. Unsightly views, such as heavy . machinery, service entrances, storage areas, rooftop equipment, loading docks, and parking areas should be screened from view of adjacent retail, commercial, light industrial and residential areas and from public streets. LU -105 Needed rights-of-way, on-site and off-site road improvements, and utilities should be assured before development occurs. LU -106 Individual development projects shall provide the following minimal improvements in accordance with established City standards: a. Full standard streets and sidewalks in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. b. Adequate off street parking for employees and patrons. c. Landscaping. d. Storm drainage. e. Water. f. Sanitary sewers. g. Controlled and developed access to existing and proposed streets. Objective 11.4. To reserve areas appropriate for industrial development. Policies: LU -107 Any significant industrial activity shall be limited to the designated Region Serving Area of the city (see Map 3.2). The Page 3-38 Land Use City recognizes that industrial development's place varying demands on the community's quality of life and service capabilities. In addition to demonstrating a developments' consistency with Plan policies, applicable land use regulations, and environmental policies, significant industrial development shall be encouraged to provide a balance between service demands and impacts placed on the city's quality of life vs. the local benefits derived from such development. The extent to which industrial development is promoted shall also take into consideration tax policy and tax structure impacts upon the C LU -108 Intrusions of residential uses into industrial areas shall not be allowed, and intrusions by commercial uses should be controlled. LU -109 The grouping of uses which will mutually benefit each other or provide needed services will be encouraged. a. Compatible commercial uses may be permitted in designated industrial areas, particularly those that primarily serve industrial businesses or their employees. b. Planned developments (such as "office parks") which provide a mixture of light industrial with supporting commercial uses are encouraged. c. Uses which support industrial and warehouse activities should be located near those uses. LU -110 Development of designated industrial sites shall be consistent with applicable environmental standards and policies. LU -110A Land made available for industrial development shall take into consideration impacts of tax policy and tax structure upon the I City of Auburn. Objective 11.4. To reserve and protect areas which are highly suitable for light industrial development. Policies: LU -111 Designation of light industrial areas shall have priority over heavier industrial uses. Page 3-7397 CHAPTER 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES Introduction. This chapter provides an overall policy direction for the different capital facility plans and programs provided by the City. Capital facilities belonging to privately owned utilities (electricity, natural gas lines, etc.) are covered in the Private Utilities chapter (Chapter 6). Certain City plans and programs are further refined in other sections of this plan such as parks or transportation. Overall, however, this chapter acts as a reference to all of the various capital facility plans, including the City of Auburn Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (which is a key component of, and is adopted with, this plan), comprehensive plans, capital improvement and investment programs, inventories, and studies that together represent the planning and financing mechanisms required to serve the capital facility needs of Auburn. For more detail on a particular Capital Facility or the City's overall Capital Facility Plan, see the most recent adopted version of the following: City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Drainage Plan City of Auburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Issues and Background Growth The provision and sizing of public facilities such as streets or water and sewer lines can influence the rate or timing of development and is an important means of managing growth. Timed provision of facilities also ensures that new development can be assimilated into the existing Page 5-1 CHAPTER 6 PRIVATE UTILITIES Introduction The Growth Management Act requires the City of Auburn to include a utilities element within its Comprehensive Plan. The element should provide a framework for the efficient and predictable provision and siting of utility facilities and services within the City consistent with the serving utilities public service obligations. This element covers private utilities, (those not provided by the City of Auburn) and includes electricity, telecommunications, and natural gas. City owned water, sewer, and stormwater utilities are described within the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 5) of this comprehensive plan. Investor owned utilities in the State of Washington are regulated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). State law regulates the rates, charges, services facilities and practices of utilities. Any changes in policies regarding these aspects of utility provision require WUTC approval. The primary responsibility for planning for private utilities rests with the utility providers. Clearly, however, this planning can not take place without open lines of communication between the City and the utility providers. The City acknowledges that some private utility providers are not willing to provide capacity or future construction plans as some of this information may effect their competitiveness or be considered to be proprietary. The utilities, however, must recognize that this may hinder the City's ability to assist them in their projects. Background Electricity and Natural Gas Puget Sound Energy (PSE) provides electrical and natural gas service to the City of Auburn and its potential annexation area. PSE is an investor- owned private utility which provides service to approximately 1.2 million customers in a service area that covers 6,000 square miles. Page 6-1 Chapter 6 Natural Gas With respect to electrical service, PSE builds, operates and maintains an electrical system consisting of generation, transmission and distribution facilities. Facility technology for electricity transmission may change in the future in response to the need to create more efficient facilities and in response to various electromagnetic field and health concerns and diversification of resources. Utility policies should be updated in the future to take into consideration changes in technology, facilities, and services. Map 6.1 shows existing and proposed electrical service facilities within the City of Auburn and its potential annexation areas. For- more eemplete and detailed infefma4ion on these faeflities, see ,' N,,.,o.,. ber- 1997 The Northwest Pipeline Corporation and Enumclaw Gas also have gas lines in the southeastern portion of the City. While the Northwest Pipeline Corporation does not serve any customers within the City, Enumclaw Gas has some residential customers in the area of the Adventist Academy. Map 6.2 shows existing major natural gas pipelines within the City and its potential annexation areas. Telecommunications Telecommunications include a wide range of services including conventional telephone, cellular telephone and cable television. Technology in the field of telecommunications continues to change rapidly. Conventional Telephone Conventional local telephone service to the City is provided by Qwest. Qwest offers service to 25 million customers in 14 Western States. The facilities in which calls are switched are called central offices. Typically there are four main lines heading out from each central office - one in each direction. Auburn's central office is located in downtown Auburn. Long distance service is provided in the area by several providers. These providers have underground fiber optic cables passing through the City of Auburn. Page 6-2 CHAPTER 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Introduction Auburn's economic base drives and shapes the community and region. Auburn residents and the surrounding region benefit from the jobs and services Auburn's economic base offers. Through the payment of sales, property and other taxes, the City of Auburn can fund and provide services and public facilities which Auburn residents demand and/or require. It is clearly in the City's best interest to maintain and expand our economic base in unison with implementing all of the goals of this Comprehensive Plan. This section of the plan will help to define the City's goals and policies in this vital area. Issues & Background Historic Trends Historically, a variety of factors have shaped Auburn's economy. At the turn of the 20'' century, the City offered services to support agriculture and the railroads. Downtown offered a full range of services and retail opportunities. In later years, automotive sales became a significant factor. As urbanization of the region expanded to include Auburn, the vitality of Downtown Auburn was impacted by new shopping malls located outside the community and by changing retail trends. At the same time, Auburn's importance as the home of large industrial and warehousing operations increased. This same period saw the growth of retail along commercial "strips" such as Auburn Way and 15th Street NW. Large retailers such as Fred Meyer and many major supermarket chains located in the community. The development of the SuperMall in the 1990's led to Auburn becoming a major player in the regional retail market. Auburn shoppers no longer needed to leave the City to visit retail malls for many of their purchases. During that same decade, Emerald Downs and the Muckleshoot Casino Page 8-1 F7Economic Development STREAMLINED SALES TAX In recent years, the State of Washington has considered legislation related to the streamlined sales tax (SST) project. Presently sales tax collection in Washington State is based on the site of origin rather than on the site of delivery. With possible legislative changes that will provide that sales tax will be collected at the site of delivery rather than from those areas from which they were shipped, cities such as Auburn would be disadvantaged and negatively impacted. Specifically, cities such as Auburn have historicallv invested in infrastructure to support businesses engaged in warehouse and distribution activities that ship goods to other destinations. Other concerns for Auburn and similar cities that have invested in infrastructure include how cities would pay for the debt that has already been extended and how losing a significant source of revenue would affect bond ratings. Based on the State's consideration of such legislation, the Auburn Ci Council approved Resolution No. 3782 in November 2004. Resolution No. 3782 outlines an approach and actions the City will take related to land use planning, zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax proposal or other similar proposals that change the tax structure are adopted. 2005 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES In 2005 the City of Auburn brought together a focus groo of diverse business and community interests that identified several economic development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is reflected in an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strategies and actions needed to affect necessary char e for orspecific strategyareas within the city. -Implementation of these strategies is intended to enable the City to achieve the City's economic development potential. Implementation of actions and strategies in the Economic Development Strategies is appropriate and reflected in various elements of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Goals and Policies ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND POLICIES Page8 55 Chapter 8 GOAL 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To ensure the long-term economic health of the City and the region through a diversified economic base that supports a wide. range of employment opportunities for Auburn's residents and those of the region and through the promotion of quality industrial and commercial development which matches the aspirations of the community. Objective 9.1. Promote a diversified economic base capable of withstanding changes in interest rates, inflation, tax structure and market conditions. ED -1 City promotion of new industry shall be directed at attracting businesshgh s.,a,,. r -y that diversifies the City's tax base , Whieh offers secure, quality employment opportunities, is sensitiveity to community values and promotes the development of attractive facilities. ED -2 Emerald Downs, the Muckleshoot Casino, and the SuperMall of the Great Northwest offer opportunities for economic diversification that should be optimized by the City. ED -3 The importance of Downtown Auburn as a unique retail environment and subregional center of commerce should be considered in the City's economic plan. ED -4 The widespread endorsement and/or adoption of Streamline Sales Tax (SST) or other similar legislation shall constitute an emergency for the purposes of amending the Comprehensive Plan outside of the normal amendment cycle in order to among other items, implement the intent of Auburn City Council Resolution No. 3782. Objective 9.2. Produce commercial and industrial siting policies which are based on the assessment of local needs and the availability of transportation and other infrastructure required to serve it. ED -45 Development of industrial areas should be based on performance standards appropriate for the site and with appropriate flexibility within those standards to accommodate changing market conditions. ED -56 Revitalize depreciated and/or obsolete commercial and industrial sites through innovative regulations that redesign the site in accordance with modern design standards and industrial/commercial uses. Page 8-6 Economic Development ED -67 Uses which serve regional needs and purposes (such as major industrial plants) must be separated from community serving uses in order to minimize traffic and other conflicts. Objective 9.3. Develop effective land use policies and economic development strategies that provide long-term and stable employment, increase per capita income and reduce the tax burden of Auburn residents. ED -7-.8 Auburn should continue to provide an economic base not only for the Auburn area but also for the south King County and north Pierce County region. ED -49 Implementation of economic development programs shall be consistent with the policies of this Plan. ED -910 The City should develop a formal economic development strategy as an element of the Comprehensive Plan to specifically identify the types of businesses most consistent with community aspirations and lay out a program to attract those businesses. a. The City should work cooperatively with other governmental agencies in its economic development efforts, including the Muckleshoot Tribe, King County, Pierce County, the Port and the State. b. The City should implement its economic development strategy through a partnership with the private sector. ED -110 Ensure that economic development strategies are reviewed I regularly in order to be flexible and respond to changes in the market. ED -124- The City should work with the private sector, school districts and Green River Community College to develop programs to provide training. Consideration of special needs of economically disadvantaged citizens and neighborhoods and people with physical impairments and developmental disabilities should be included in these programs. ED -132 Support continued development of the Sound Transit Commuter Rail system, as an important means of expanding the City's and the region's economic base. Page8-7 Chapter 8 ED -14-3 City infrastructure plans and programs should take into consideration economic development plans and programs. ED -15 Implement the recommendations of the City's 2005 Economic Development Strategies brochure. Objective 9.4 Maintain an adequate supply of land to support future economic development and assure the availability of economic opportunities for future generations. ED -164 Economic development programs should be viewed as a way to shape the character of the City's future economy rather than merely respond to market trends as they occur. ED -17-5 Land suitable for large scale development in the Region Serving Area of the City should be identified and designated for economic development. a. The integrity of large, contiguously owned properties suitable for industrial use should be conserved by use of appropriate industrial subdivision standards. b. The City should identify and resolve any environmental constraints affecting such land by means of the appropriate environmental review procedures as early as feasible. c. The need to support such land with the necessary infrastructure should be considered in the development of the City's public facility plans. d. Innovative and flexible development regulations should be utilized to enable the development of environmentally constrained sites while protecting those characteristics. Utilize the City's unique environmental opportunities and pla infrastructure to build on and support economic development efforts. ED -18 Integrate the Auburn Environmental Park (AEP) into the Citv's economic development efforts by encouraging compatible high teth businesses to locate in its vicinity. Amend regulations to establish appropriate land uses for that area as well as develop strategies and incentives to promote the area as a "Green Zone" for economic development. Page 8-8 Economic Development ED -19 Utilize the future extension of I Street NE as an economic development opportunity. Development I Street NE should establish it as stand alone corridor and not a "back side" to Auburn WE North Condtional use permit applications for commercial uses and nursing homes along this corridor and whose impacts can be adequately mitigated should be supported. ED -20 Use the M Street SE underpass and development of a M Street SE and R Street SE bypass connection as an opportunity to create and encourage the clustering of complementary business and services in that area. Page 8-9 CHAPTER 9 THE ENVIRONMENT Introduction One of the key attractions of Auburn and the Puget Sound Region has always been the abundant natural resources found throughout the area. The Green River Valley was once a major supplier of agricultural goods for the region and farming remains in some parts of the valley. Thick forests, wetlands, and wildlife habitats are found throughout the area. As the area develops, many of these features, which serve to make the area attractive in the first place, are being lost. The strong emphasis placed on the designation and protection of resource lands and critical areas in the Growth Management Act, the Countywide Policies and this plan reflect the important role that these areas play in maintaining the health, safety and welfare of the area's citizens. Issues Environmental Constraints and Land Use The City's overall environmental policy should describe the kinds of environmental information and factors that are important to the community. This information can be used to decide if, where and how certain kinds of development and other activities should be allowed. City policy should recognize the natural constraints placed on development by such factors as unstable slopes, flooding and wetlands. A critical environmental concern is the proper management of gravel extraction. This is an industry which has been active in Auburn for many years and which remains a viable industry. The City should establish clear policies to guide the retention of valued aspects of the City's environment, such as protection of the City's open space and significant wildlife habitats. The policy should seek to ensure ample opportunity for the City's residents to meet their recreational needs. Policies should be Page 9-1 Chapter 9 its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigating measures. EN -72 Large scale speculative filling and grading activities not associated with a development proposal shall be discouraged as it reduces a vegetated site's natural ability to provide erosion control and biofiltration, absorb storm water, and filter suspended particulates. In instances where speculative filling is deemed appropriate, disturbed vegetation shall be restored as soon as possible, and appropriate measures to control erosion and sedimentation until the site is developed shall be required. EN -73 The City shall consider the impacts of new development on Class I and Class III landslide hazard areas (Map 9.7) as part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigating measures. The impacts of the new development, both during and after construction, on adjacent properties shall also be considered. EN -74 Auburn will seek to retain areas with slopes in excess of 402-5 percent as primarily open space areas in order to protect against erosion and landslide hazards and to limit significant removal of vegetation to help conserve Auburn's identity within the metropolitan region. Slopes greater than 15 percent with zones of emergent water (springs or ground water seepages) and all slopes with mappable landslide potential identified by a geotechnical study shall also be protected from alterations an eleafin - other- •saE,aaaaaV4laat aVa1aV 1141 VL ♦VbV4{441V11 on sueh slopes shall be r -e l ate by pefmitr EN -75 The City will require that a geotechnical report prepared by a professional engineer licensed by the State of Washington with expertise in geotechnical engineering be submitted for all significant activities proposed within Class I and Class III landslide hazard areas (Map 9.7). The City shall develop administrative guidelines which identify the procedures and information required for the geotechnical reports. EN -76 New development within Class I and Class III landslide hazard areas (Map 9.7) shall be designed and located to minimize site disturbance and removal of vegetation, and to maintain the natural topographic character of the site. Clustering of structures, minimizing building footprints, and retaining trees and other natural vegetation, shall be considered. Page 9-16 CHAPTER 11 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Introduction Adequate parks and recreation facilities are an essential amenity to maintain a suitable quality of life in the community. As the population of Auburn grows, the demand for its parks and recreational programs will increase. To maintain Auburn's quality of life, the supply of these parks and programs must keep pace with the demand placed on them by a growing population. Open space also plays a key role in the quality of life in an area. While many understand the concept of the attraction of the western United States and its "open spaces", the concept of open space becomes less clear when it comes to open space and its appropriateness to a City such as Auburn. The policies below provide a definition of open space as applied to Auburn and its surroundings and provide a framework for the identification and preservation of these areas. GOAL 21 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE To provide and maintain a comprehensive system of parks and open spaces that responds to the recreational, cultural, environmental and aesthetic needs and desires of the City's residents. Objective 21.1. To provide a broad and comprehensive park system that meets the recreational needs of all segments of the community. Policies: PR -1 The Auburn Park and Recreation Plan, as may be amended or updated in the future is hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Page 11-1 Parks Objective 21.2 To provide for an adequate and diverse supply of open spaces. Open space is typically defined as land that will remain undeveloped or only lightly developed (a trail, for instance) and will be managed to protect and enhance the natural environment. Policies: PR -7 The City shall seek to retain as open space those areas having a unique combination of open space values, including: separation or buffering between incompatible land uses; visual delineation of the City or a distinct area or neighborhood of the City; unusually productive wildlife habitat; wetlands; floodwater or stormwater storage; stormwater purification; recreational value; historic or cultural value; aesthetic value; and educational value. PR -8 The City shall seek to retain as open space areas where the soils have been identified as having severe or very severe erosion potential, landslide hazard or seismic hazard. PR -9 The City shall seek to retain as open space those areas that provide essential habitat for any rare, threatened or endangered plant or wildlife species. PR -10 The City shall seek to acquire open space lands which provide significant environmental or social value. Such open space shall be managed to conserve and improve the natural, visual, historic and cultural resources associated with the land. PR -11 All areas of Regulatory Floodway within the City shall be retained as undeveloped open space. However, this shall not preclude the relocation of the Mill Creek floodway as long as any such relocation is consistent with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and m4th the -designee the "Proposal f r Mill Creek Geffid study. Th Mill�Cre v Ceffider- shall be a stun of 140 feet in m4dt.-� zi=evekopnentt within the Creek Ceffider, ineluding fleedw y r-elooutien, should be eensistent with the Proposal for- Mill Creek Ceffide Wy. PR -12 Development within areas designated for open space uses shall, in general, be non -intensive in character. Development shall be de- signed and sited in a manner that minimizes or mitigates disruption of the most important open space values of the site. Appropriate uses within designated open space areas may, include (but not necessarily be limited to): parks and other recreational facilities; agriculture; stormwater storage; and watershed. It is recognized Page 11-3 Chapter 11 that designating private property for open space uses does not establish or promote any public access rights to such property. PR -13 The City shall explore all including outright purchase conservation easements. means of open space acquisition of the land or the purchase of PR -14 The City shall pursue opportunities to provide active and passive recreational opportunities and enhance wetland and wildlife habitat within the Auburn Environmental Parkeg nerally located north of West Main Street, south of 15th Street NW between SR 167 and the Interurban Trail. Grant funding and cooperative relationships with recreational and wildlife organizations shall be pursued to implement this policy. Page 11-4 CHAPTER 13 DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS AND ANNEXATION Introduction Over the years, extensive development has occurred in the unincorporated areas surrounding Auburn. This trend is likely to continue in the future. Ultimately, most if not all of these areas will be incorporated into the Cities of Auburn, Kent or Federal Way in King County, and Sumner in Pierce County. Discussions between these cities have resulted in the designation of potential annexation areas (PAAs) or urban services areas (USAs) for each jurisdiction. PAA's is the term used in King County for urban growth areas while Urban Services Areas is the term used in Pierce County. Throughout this document, the terms PAA, USA and UGA (Urban Growth Area) are used interchangeably. It is anticipated that areas within each City's PAA/USA will annex to the city at the appropriate time. Issues and Background Annexation and Utility Service in Unincorporated Areas Annexation is the inclusion of previously unincorporated lands within the City limits. While development in the unincorporated areas surrounding the City may have significant impacts on the city itself, including, but not limited to, traffic, parks, and city utilities, the City has limited control over the development that takes place in these areas. For these reasons, the City and its citizens have a vested interest in seeing that the City increases its ability to control development in these areas through annexation. Page 13-1 Annexation CE -9 Auburn's Growth Impact Area is designated by Map 3.1. Growth and development within these areas has a high potential for impacting the City and its residents. The City shall seek interlocal agreements with King County, Pierce County and other appropriate jurisdictions, to provide a meaningful role for the City in the development of land use and development policy, and in the review of significant development proposals, within these areas. CE -10 The City shall oppose, and shall seek adjoining jurisdictions agreement to prohibit, additional urban development within Auburn's Potential Annexation Area, unless adequate urban governmental services (including but not limited to storm and sanitary sewer systems, water utility systems, adequate streets and arterials, parks and open spaces, fire and police protection services, emergency medical services, public schools and public transit services) are provided concurrent with development. Exceptions to the requirement for urban sanitary sewer and water utility service may be permitted pursuant to a Non -remonstrance Agreement between the City and the property owner and satisfying the requirements of the King County Board of Health for property situated in King County or the Pierce County Board of Health for Property situated in Pierce County CE -11 Whenever on site sewage facilities are allowed, they shall be sited, designed, built and maintained according to guidelines of the King County Department of Health for property situated in King County and the Pierce County Department of Health for property situated in Pierce County. If built in an area contributory to any beneficial groundwater use, including but not limited to planned or existing potable water sources or existing fisheries, such facilities shall demonstrate compliance with the Washington State Anti - Degradation Policy (WAC 173-200-030) and implement all known, available and reasonable methods of control and treatment for the reduction or elimination of pollutants. CE -12 The City of Auburn shall pursue processes to include areas around North _Lak_e_ Tapps within the Citv's Potential Annexation (Urban Services) Area. This will also include seeking an amendment to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to include areas presently designated "Rural" into the County Urban Growth Area (CUGA). Ci comprehensive plan designations and zoning applied to these areas shall provide for appropriate lower and moderate density Page 13-5 I Chapter 13 transitions adiacent to the City's existing "Rural" and R1 (Single Family Residential") zonesens s Genf *-, to permanently designate taav th , Page 13-6 CHAPTER 14 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP Introduction The previous chapters presented the goals, objectives and policies intended to guide Auburn's future physical development. The Comprehensive Plan Map presented in this chapter (Map 14.1) applies those policies to the various areas of the City, by indicating the appropriate locations for various categories of land use. The Plan Map should be consulted together with the written policies of this Plan when decisions about land use and public facility development are considered. This chapter also explains the reasoning and intention behind the Plan Map's land use designations. This should be useful in developing and applying implementing tools (such as zoning provisions); for interpreting the Plan Map as it applies to specific regulatory decisions or development proposals; and in adjusting or amending the Plan Map when changing conditions or land use markets warrant. Finally, this chapter sets forth some special policies intended to deal with the unique problems or opportunities that exist in certain specific locations within Auburn. These specific policies supplement the general goals, objectives and policies of earlier chapters. Land Use Designations: Plan Map Residential Categories Rural Page 14-1 Chapter 14 - 1) RO - Residential Office District which is intended to primarily accommodate business and professional offices where they are compatible with residential uses. 2) RO-H Residential Office -Hospital District is to be used exclusively for the area around Auburn Regional Medical Center. Industrial Categories Light Industrial Purpose: To reserve quality industrial lands for activities that implement the City's economic development policy. Description: This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of industrial and ewe—Scale commercial uses. It is distinguished from heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant activities shall take place inside buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictly controlled and permitted only as an incidental part of another use. The siting and design of industrial buildings shall be of an "industrial or business park" character. Compatible Uses: A wide range of industrial and heavy commercial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. These uses include warehousing and indoor processing of materials. Outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with adjacent uses and so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be extensively screened. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials as well as substantial emissions should not be permitted in these areas. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed on a eendifienal basis provided that such uses support rather than detract from the industrial character of the area. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Auburn Yard located within the Railroad Special Plan Area is considered a compatible use at its current level of usage (as of August 14, 1996). It is not bound by the policies concerning outside storage under the existing light industrial designation as it was an existing use prior to the development of this policy. Should BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to upgrade the yard to an intermodal facility, the proposal will be subject to the essential public Page 14-14 Comp. Plan facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 5). Criteria for Designation: This designation should be applied to a majority of the Region Serving Area designated under this Plan. It is particularly appropriate for industrial land within high visibility corridors. This category should separate heavy industrial areas from other uses. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Within the Community Serving Area, this designation should only be applied to sites now developed as light industrial sites. Industrial sites along rail corridors are generally more appropriate for heavier industrial uses, unless in high visibility corridors. Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the M-1 or Business Park (BP) zone. Heavy Industrial Purpose: To provide a place for needed heavy industrial uses in areas appropriately sited for such uses. Description: This designation allows the full range of industrial uses as well as certain commercial uses. Compatible Uses: While this zone should be reserved primarily for the heavier forms of industrial activities, a wide range of industrial and commercial activities may be permitted. Criteria for Designation: The most appropriate area for this designation is in the central part of the Region Serving Area adjoining the rail lines. This designation is also appropriate in the southern portion of the area which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities (the Boeing and the General Services Administration facilities). Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation can only be applied in the Community Serving Area to sites now developed in this character along A Street S.E. These areas should not abut commercial or residential areas; heavy industry should be buffered by light industrial uses. It is not an appropriate designation for highly visible areas. Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the M-2 zone. Page 14-15 Comp. Plan Map Auburn with a renewed emphasis on providing housing in the Downtown. Development of the Downtown Area Plan should consider and integrate: 1. The Downtown Auburn Design Master Plan. 2. The Commuter Rail Station Siting Report. 3. The Auburn Downtown Plan (2001). Lakeland Hills Special Planning Area: The Lakeland Hills Plan was adopted by resolution No. 1851 in April 1988. The Plan covers the approximately 458 acres of the Lakeland Hills development which falls within the City of Auburn. The Plan calls for a mix of residential uses including single and multi -family housing as well as supporting recreational, commercial, public and quasi -public uses. The plan calls for phasing of development. in coordination with the provision of necessary urban services. Lakeland Hills South Special Planning Area: The Lakeland Hills South Plan initially covered approximately 685 acres owned by The Lakeland Company within Pierce County and contained within the City of Auburn potential annexation area (urban growth area). The Plan is intended to be consistent with the conditions of approval of the Lakeland Hills South PDD (Pierce County Hearings Examiner Case No. Z15-90/UP9-70) as amended. The City of Auburn has accepted the Lakeland Hills South PUD as an approved PUD. This acceptance is implemented in part through an annexation and utilities agreement between the City and the developer of Lakeland Hills South PUD. The Lakeland Hills South PUD is further implemented by the City's zoning code, including ACC Chapter 18.76 entitled "Planned Unit Development District—Lakeland Hills South Special Plan Area". Residential development within the PUD is primarily single family and moderate density dwellings with a wide range of lot sizes, including lots smaller than those typically allowed by the City's zoning ordinance for non-PUD's. The maximum allowable number of residential units provided for originally was 3,408 based upon an overall gross density of 5 units per acre. High density multifamily units are limited to one area of the PUD to approximately 669 units. Twenty acres are to be used for light commercial development and significant area has been set aside as open space. The development includes a developed 15 -acre park, an undeveloped 15 -acre park, two 5 -acre parks and a linear park along Lakeland Hills Way. The locations of the parks are shown on the comprehensive plan map. Changing the location of any or all of the parks does not constitute a comprehensive plan amendment provided that the Page 14-17 Chapter 14 - total park acreage does not change and the location is agreed upon by the City. Within the Lakeland Hills South Special Plan area only, the permitted density ranges for the comprehensive plan designations are as follows: Single Family Residential: 1-6 units per acre; Moderate Density Residential: 2-14 units per acre; and High Density Residential: 12-19 units per acre. The development is occurring in phases in coordination with the provision of required urban services. In 2004, the developer of Lakeland Hills South PUD requested an expansion to the Lakeland Hills South PUD involving several parcels totaling approximately 77 acres — bringing the total PUD acreage to approximately 762 acres. The proposal designated these additional parcels as "Moderate Density Residential" (from "Single Family Residential") with the objective of increasing the total number of units allowed in the PUD from 3,408 to approximately 3,658. Subsequently, in 2005, it was determined and agreed that the total number of units within even the expanded boundaries of the PUD would be no greater than 3,408. In considering expansion to the PUD, the City established provisions and conditions to be followed during subsequent review of land use actions affecting the PUD expansion area. These include: 1. Expansion of the Lakeland Hills South PUD and the amendment to a "Moderate Density Residential" comprehensive plan designation (from "Single Family Residential") shall expire and revert back to a "Single Family Residential" Comprehensive Plan designation if the applicant fails to complete a rezone as required by ACC Section 18.76.170(C) to extend the exterior boundaries of the PUD prior to December 1, 2005. This condition shall not apply if the applicant has made a good faith effort to execute the rezone and a delay is associated with elements other than the applicant's delay in filing for a rezone in a timely manner. 2. The rezone and any related applications shall demonstrate that the northernmost approximately 20 -acres adjacent to and contiguous with the Lakeland Hills South PUD neighborhoods of Evergreen and Eastpointe shall not be developed as "for rent", "semi-detached" or "attached" housing products so that the existing single family residential character can transition to and be extended into the subject parcels. Development within this northerly 20 acres shall be restricted to utilizing the Page 14-18 Comp. Plan development standards no more intense than "Single Family Detached (SFD-5)" provisions of ACC Chapter 18.76. Lakeview Special Planning Area: The Lakeview Special Planning Area is currently the site of two independent sand and gravel mining operations. While mining activity continues in the eastern operation, indications in 1995 are that the western operation has ceased. Activity in the western portion is now limited to a concrete batch plant and future site reclamation. Following reclamation, the area should be developed as a primarily single family residential neighborhood of low to moderate urban density. A planned unit development would be particularly appropriate for this approximately 235 acre site. The permitted development density of the site will depend heavily upon the ability of the transportation system near the site to handle the new uses. Consideration shall be given to the environmental, recreational and amenity value of White Lake, as well as the historical and cultural significance to the Muckleshoot Tribe, in the development of the Lakeview Plan element. Permit applications have been accepted and are currently being processed by the City with respect to the mining activity on the eastern portion of the area. The permit process should continue, however, any permit for continued mining in this portion of the area should be limited to 10 years to encourage completion of the mining, and subsequent reclamation by the property owner in preparation for development. The Lakeview Plan element should be adopted prior to the City's acceptance or processing of any other permit applications for the mining operation in the Lakeview Special Planning Area. The environmental information and analysis included in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Lakeview (November 1980), shall be considered in the development of the Lakeview Plan element. While heavy commercial or industrial uses would not be appropriate as permanent uses of this area, conversion of the area now zoned for heavy industry to office commercial (or similar) uses would be appropriate. Rail Yard Special Planning Area: This approximately 150 acre Special Planning Area is located in the south-central portion of the City and surrounded by SR -18 to the North, Ellingson Road to the South, C Street SW to the west and A Street SE to the East. The Special Planning Area should consider both sides of C Street and A Street. Consideration should be given to: 1. The needs of Burlington Northern. 2. Providing pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access across the site to connect the southeast and southwest sides of the city. Page 14-19 Comp. Plan Policy III.F. Land use decisions shall seek to minimize any adverse impact on adjacent residential uses. Existing commercial uses should be allowed to continue as permitted uses. New development should be consistent with the office/residential use designation. M Street Residential Area: Area along "M" Street S.E., south of East Main and north of Highway 18. Problem: This is a high quality viable residential area. Pressure will continue for conversion to commercial uses. Once some conversion occurs, the area will no longer be viable as a residential area. Policy III.G. The City will resist conversion in this area from single family. Golden Triangle Area: Bordered on the north by Highway 18 on the south and west by Auburn Way South, and on the east b�Dogwood Street. Problem: Auburn Way South -provides a thoroughfare for thousands of commuters each day. The "pass through" traffic represents thousands of potential customers for the businesses in this area. The challenge is to create an area that encourages potential consumers to take the time to patronize the businesses in this area either through stopping during their commute or returning during leisure time hours. Policy III. G.1. Support opportunities for the development of commercial clusters at 12th Street SE and Auburn Way South Auburn Way South to M Street SE south of 12 Street SE and on the east side of 12"' and M Street SE. Capitalize on possible relocations of existing uses to develop coordinated commercial cluster opportunities and on the development of Les Gove Park to support adjacent commercial and high end residential development. A Street SE Area: A Street SE corridor, extending from Highway 18 to the north to the city limits to the south, the BNSF rail lines/rail yard to the west and D Street SE (extended to the south) to the east. Problem: A Street SE provides for a significant level of traffic that offers the potential to attract customers to support existing and future business along this corridor. Challenges include better definition of the transition between residential neighborhoods and future commercial development to Page14-25 Chapter 14 provide predictability for both neighborhood residents and commercial uses, as well as how to address historical uses such as mobile home narks and industrial development along this corridor that occupy property that is better suited for other uses Policy III. G.2. Define appropriate transition boundaries between commercial and residential development in a manner that protects residential uses while providing for economic development opportunities along the corridor. Problems Related to Existing Uses West Auburn Area: South of West Main between the rail lines. Problem: This is an older part of town developed in a pattern of commercial uses along Main Street and residential uses south to Highway 18. This area is in the Region Serving Area as designated in this Plan. The homes in this area are typically older singer family homes that have been converted to multi -family housing. Some may have historic significance. Preservation and restoration of the existing housing in this area is a priority. Policy III.H. This area should be planned for local serving multiple family uses even though it is in the Region Serving Area. Western and Clay Streets Area: Existing residential area north of West Main Street served by Western and Clay Streets. Problem: There is an established residential area in the middle of a designated industrial area. This Plan - es the desire of the °siden4s t,.maintain residential • However, economic pressure, the desire to promote a "Green Zone" to complement the Auburn Environmental Park, eeuplcombined with adjacent development patterns will ultimately convert this area to other uses. Policy III.I. As long as this area remains viable as a residential area, City policy will try to—suppertrep tect that use in assessing the impact of industrial development of adjacent areas. Airport Area Area: Industrially designated area east of the Airport. Page 14-26 Comp. Plan Problem: This area is highly suited for air related activities. Other industrial type uses are now located here. Policy III.J. The City will encourage use in this area to take advantage of its proximity to the Airport. 30`h and I Street Area: Northwest corner of I street NE and 301h Street NE Problem: This area includes property that is designated "Light Industrial" and is located within the community serving area of the city. It is the only "Light Industrial" designated parcel in the Auburn Way North/I Street NE corridor from about 12`h Street NE to the north city limits. The property is occupied by a light industrial non-profit business. Policy III.K. No further expansion of the "Light Industrial" plan designation in the community serving area is appropriate. Retention of the "Light Industrial" designation for this property is only appropriate so long as light industrial use of the property remains compatible with the surrounding heavy commercial and high density residential land uses. Page 14-27