Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15451 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1 5 4 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, TO EXECUTE AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AUBURN GAME FARM. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IN A REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH RESOLVES THAT: THE Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington, is herewith authorized to execute an Interagency Agreement with the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission for development, operation and maintenance of the Auburn Game Farm. A copy of said Agreement is attached hereto, denominated as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein. THE Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. DATED and SIGNED this 19th day of November, 1984. ATTEST: City C erk -------------------------- Resolution No. 1545 11/13/84 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, herein- after referred to as the Commission, is the owner of certain undeveloped land within the City of Auburn; and, WHEREAS, the City of Auburn, hereinafter referred to as the City, desires to use said undeveloped land for recreation facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Commission recognizes that the City has the authority and capability for administering this land for public recreational use; and, WHEREAS; said land is highly adaptable to development as an urban outdoor recreational site; and, WHEREAS, the Commission desires to provide for the development and operation of urban park facilities consistent with the intent of Chapter 43.51.380 and.385 RCW; NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the public recreation benefits to be derived, the parties hereby enter into an agreement for development, operation and maintenance for urban recreational park purposes, the following described real property commonly known as the Auburn Game Farm situate In the City of Auburn, Washington; and consisting of 160 acres: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Government Lots 9 and 10; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same as excluded in deed recorded under Recording No. 102353; Government Lots 6 and 7, AND the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, and Government Lot 11; EXCEPT the North 60 feet of Government Lot 11; AND EXCEPT that portion of Government Lot 11 conveyed to the City of Auburn for street purposes by deed recorded under Recording No. 5896174; All in Section 29, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; situate in King County, State of Washington. 1. The approximately four acre administrative site is set aside to be developed, operated and maintained solely by the Commission and will not be subject to any other terms of the agreement. Reference to the site hereafter shall refer to the entire 160 acre site excluding the administrative site. -2- 2. The term of this agreement shall be for 40 years commencing on the date last below written. This agreement may be renewed for any period not in excess of 40 years upon expiration of the original 40-year term by mutual agreement of the parties. The City will first be given the right to renew this agreement before any other party is given the opportunity to operate the subject property under agreement with the Commission. 3. This agreement is only permission to allow the City to use the above described property for the purposes and on the terms and conditions herein stated. No legal or equitable title is conveyed to the City hereby. Title to the subject property shall remain in the Commission throughout the term of this agreement or any renewal thereof. In the event that the Commission should find that the public could best be served by transfer to another public entity, the City shall be given the first opportunity to accept the transfer before any other party is given that opportunity. 4. The City's master site plan for the improvement and use of the subject property has been prepared and is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this agreement. The master site plan may be modified at any time by the mutual consent of the parties hereto. 5. The City and the Commission shall be jointly responsible for all costs for development, operation and maintenance of the site as follows: a. The Commission shall seek an appropriation for development of all recreational facilities south of the White River. When funded, these facilities are to be constructed simultaneously with or following City facilities north of the river. b. The City shall seek funding for development of all remaining park and recreation facilities north of the White River as shown on the master site plan. C. The City shall be responsible for operation and maintenance of all park and recreational facilities north and south of the White River. d. Until development funds are obtained, the Commission shall be responsible for surveillance and maintenance of the entire site. -3- 6. The subject property is to be developed and operated as a recreation site consistent with the provisions of Chapter 43.51 and all applicable Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation and federal funding rules and requirements. 7. While administering the subject property under this agreement, the City shall be in possession of all necessary permits and licenses and shall carry out all development, maintenance and operation according to all applicable codes and regulations, including those of SEPA under which, by entering into this agreement, the City assumes lead agency status for this project. 8. The name of the recreation site developed hereunder shall be chosen by the City, subject to the approval of the Commission. The City shall erect and maintain a sign Identifying the Commission as a cooperating agency. 9. On or before the first day of each calendar year, the City shall file a report with the Director, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, 7150 Cleanwater Lane KY-11, Olympia, WA 98504, to verify compliance with the master site plan. The report shall include an account of all income, expenses, development accomplishment, park operation schedules and third party contracts or agreements entered into during the preceding year. The plan may be amended based on mutual agreement. 10. The City shall defend and hold harmless the Commission and the state of Washington, its officers, agents, employees, successors or assigns against any and all claims suffered or alleged to be suffered on the property, except such claims which arise out of the activities of the Commission, Its officers, agents or employees, for which claims the Commission will defend and hold the City harmless. II. Upon termination or expiration of this agreement, all improvements placed on the subject property under this agreement shall be disposed of as follows: a. All permanent structures and buildings including appurtenant utility services shall become the property of the Commission, at its option. Any such improvements not accepted by the -4- Commission shall be identified in writing by the Commission within 30 days after termination or expiration of this agree- ment, and shall be removed from the site by the City within 120 days of termination or expiration of this agreement. b. All other improvements shall remain the property of the City. The City shall notify the Commission in writing within 30 days after termination or expiration of this agreement, which, if any, of these improvements and materials the City plans to remove from the property. Upon receipt of said written notice, the Commission shall then have 30 days to notify the City in writing which, if any, of the remaining improvements it will accept. The City shall then remove all non-accepted improvements within 60 days of receipt of said written notice. Improvements accepted by the Commission shall become the property of the state. C. In removing any improvements or materials, the City shall restore the property as nearly as practicable to its natural condition. If improvements or materials are not removed and the property restored as provided for herein, in a reasonable time period acceptable to the Commission, the Commission, following written notice to the City, may accomplish the work and charge the costs to the City. d. The disposition of all buildings and improvements shall be accomplished in compliance with RCW's and Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation funding regulations. 12. This agreement shall automatically terminate if the City uses the property for anything other than the public urban park recreation purposes detailed in the approved mastar site plan as attached hereto rlr otherwise modified in the future by mutual consent of the parties hereto per Article 4. 13. This agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of the parties hereto. -5- 14. Except as otherwise provided for herein, this agreement may be terminated by the Commission in the event of non-compliance by the City with the terms and conditions hereof, providing that the Commission allow the City 90 days after written notice of violation in which to correct any situation which is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. If correction is not made to the satisfaction of the Commission within the 90 days, this agreement will automatically terminate without further notice. 15. Any tree removal shall be in accordance with Commission rules and regulations. 16. Any income resulting from the use of this park shall be used only for the development and operation of this site in accordance with the approved master site plan. 17. The provisions of this agreement may be modified at any time by the mutual consent of the parties hereto. 18. The City may not assign any of its rights under this agreement without the prior written consent of the Commission. This does not preclude third party agreements for concession purposes. DATED this 20th day of NOVEMBER , 198 4 . CITY OF AUBURN By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: KEN 0. EIKENBERRY Attorney Generpa4., Daniel William ckoff Assistant Attor ev Gene al WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION By %?Vh 1?? n Tveten, Director d 1 1 d 1 { 1 d l 7 d 1 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 Master Site Plan AUBURN GAME FARM City of Auburn Spring, 1984 Mayor Park Board Bob Roegner Mary Caldwell, Chairman Yoka Ansingh City Council Brian Crain Chuck Patrick Burns Jones Gene Colburn Koji Norikane Ron Craig Cal Scarff Mary Tungsvik Don Kur le Bud Larson Pete Whittall Linda Wisner Parke and Recreation Department Len Chapman, Director Dick Deal, Recreation Supervisor Sharon LaVigne, Recreation Supervisor Cheryl Sallee, Senior Center Supervisor Pam Workman, Secretary Jougejan/Gerrard/McNeal Terry Gerrard, Principal-in-Charge Janis Snoey, Project Landscape Architect Table of Contents The Master Plan Introduction I -I The Master Site Plan I-1 Design Goals I-2 Program and Plan Elements 1-2 Site Inventory Introduction I I - 1 Site Analysis and Existing Conditions II-1 History I I -1 Hydrology and Flood Hazard II-3 Soils 11-5 Slope 11-5 Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat II-5 Land Use 11-7 Utilities 11-7 Circulation 11 -7 Plan and Program Development Introduction III-1 The Auburn Park and Recreation Plan I II-1 Public Involvement III-1 The First Public Meeting III-2 The Schematic Plan 111 -2 The Preliminary Plan 111-2 Appendix Estimate of Probable Construction Cost - Entire Project IV-1 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost - Phase 1; IV-5 Proposed Park Entrance IV-7 Alternate Park Entrance IV-8 I t ) t 1 t 3 1 1 1 1 1 ! t 1 ! 1 I 1 CHAPTER ONE: The Master Plan I 1 ? 1 1 1 ? 1 1 t 1 1 1 } - -------------- The Master Site Plan - - - Introduction The Auburn Game Farm park site has been an important open space in the Auburn community for many years. Many residents recall visiting the site, when it was a Washington State De- partment of Game facility, to see game birds, deer and raccoon. The White River, which bisects the site, is heavily used for fishing, water play, hiking and picnicking. The Department of Game declared the site as surplus in 1978 and it was destined to be sold at public auction for private residential development. City of Auburn officials recognized the value of retaining the site for park and open space purposes. The City contacted their State legisla- tive delegation to gain assistance in transferring the Game Farm site from the Department of Game to Washington State Parks. The State legislature made this transfer in 1981. The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission presently owns the site. Now that the Auburn City Council has accepted the Master Site Plan for the park, the City will begin negotiating a long-term lease with State Parks. The site will then be developed by the City when funds become available. The Master Site Plan once the Auburn Game Farm was set aside for park use, a master plan could be developed for the site. The master plan was developed in interre- lated phases. The initial phase was site inventory. The inventory included the natural and constructed conditions that will affect recreation development of the site. The documentation from this phase can be found in Chapter 2: Site Inventory. Chapter 3: Program Development) it has strong support in the community. An Environmental Checklist has been completed for the project. A Declaration of Non-significance has been issued with two conditions: 1) During construction, an archeologist must be on site, observing excavation and grading. 2) Prior to development of the southeast side of the river, a more intensive analysis of environ- mental impacts must be completed. Program development was the second major phase. During program develop- ment, the opinions, needs and desires of the community were collected and assessed to develop a preliminary program. The documentation from this phase is found in Chapter 3: Plan and Program Development. Based on the results of the site inventory and the preliminary pro- gram, a schematic plan was developed. This was reviewed and assessed by the community, appropriate agencies and committees. Then the schematic plan was refined and modified into the preliminary plan which was pre- sented for final adoption by the City of Auburn. The final plan, shown on the next page, has been adopted by the Auburn Park Board and the Auburn City Coun- cil. It has received the approval of the Washington State Parks and Recre- ation Commission. As shown in the responses at public meetings (see Design Goals The process of program development and site analysis resulted in a set .of design goals or principles. These are : ¦ Respect the landscape character of the site. ¦ Create a unique sense of place. ¦ Provide a wide range of activities. ¦ Provide a balance of active and passive recreation facilities in an attractive park setting. ¦ Minimize the impact of the automo- bile, yet provide an even distribu- tion of parking for users of all facilities. r Minimize the impact of activities, lights and traffic on adjacent residents. ¦ Explore the opportunities created by the Auburn Diversion Dam. ¦ Respond to the historical role of the site in the community. ¦ Prepare a plan that allows develop- ment to be easily phased. ¦ Respect Auburn Park and Recreation Plan (1981) goals. ¦ Respond to community input. ¦ Provide a plan that will generate support of the community. I-2 Program and Plan Elements River Meadow The River Meadow will be the heart of the park; an informal area for pic- nicking, sunbathing, kite flying and riverfront activities such as fishing and waterplay. In its existing condi- tion, it has a unique character: gently rolling meadows, the abrupt edge of the Auburn Diversion Dam and the vital recreation and.scenic re- source of the White (Stuck) River. The unstructured use of this area will preserve its unique charac- teristics and enhance the opportuni- ties for people to appreciate the pleasure it offers. Children's Play Area This area will feature one or more large play structures. The design of the structure(s) will be unique to the Auburn Game Farm Park and will offer climbing, jumping, crawling and swinging activities for children and adults of all ages. The play area will be located on a knoll so that it will be visible to most of the picnic and park area. The healthy apple trees from the existing orchard will be incorporated into the design. .i I I I I I I i f 1 I I Group Picnic Shelter and Informal Ampitheater The group picnic shelter will be a structure designed to comfortably accommodate one large group or sever- al smaller groups. It will have power and water. The shelter will be sited to take advantage of river views as well as the protection and privacy offered by the alignment of the dam. Part of the shelter will also func- tion as a stage for the amphitheater. The amphitheater will be very infor- mal: nothing more than a grass bowl. ??,,,\. ItiJ?•-yam' ? •.I '•{Trails and Walkways o' Walkways are 10 feet wide, designed for multi-use including walking, bi- cycling, jogging and emergency/ser- vice access. A course with exercise stations will also be located on the trail circuit within the park. Main walkways will be asphalt. Informal trails will be crushed rock or natu- ral surfaces. t' 1 t I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Game Farm Interpretive Display Tennis Courts Concession/Restroom Building The interpretive display structure The tennis courts, which are lighted A structure with restrooms and an will incorporate existing structures and fenced are located near the en- area for concessions. This building or foundations. These are near the trance of the park for convenience. will be located to serve the large proposed caretaker's residence which numbers of people participating in will be an advantage in caring for III ? • • • sports events. the facility. The display will con- _ ;. sist of vandal resistant signs (such ?• Caretaker as steel with fired ceramic finish) - with graphics and text describing the ! A full-time caretaker will live on history of the white/Stuck River and site in an existing bungalow. of the Game Farm. Live game birds may be displayed in natural and appropri- ate settings. ?= ?`??`,'"'. ,?• • Multi-purpose Courts These are small asphalt surfaced ,. courts with basketball hoops and ...+ = ' equipment to set up volleyball nets. Tot Lots ..?: - The uses may include informal court r games, rollerskating and skateboard- These are small play areas with inq. equipment or structures suitable for ' younger children. The tot-lot at the _ north will be located to serve the ", ,( ?•` adjacent neighborhood. The tot-lot in the central part of the site will be r -: .... located so that smaller children will ` _ rf .. ?'t'• have a place to play while older ?•.? • siblings or parents are playing field sports. This tot-lot will be located I Restroom Building among existing trees. , This restroom building will be located to serve the people.using the Group Shelter and River Meadow Area. Sports Field Complex Parking State Parks Area The sports fields are located in an Parking for approximately 275 ve- The plan will allow for the Washing- area of grassland and away from the hicles will be provided in a long ton State Parks and Recreation Com- adjacent neighborhoods, roads, and linear system in order to limit the mission to maintain Region 5 head- the River Meadow. This location will impact of the car, yet provide an quarters administrative facilities at limit the amount of grading and even distribution of parking for the Game Farm. The facility, which clearing needed to construct the users of all facilities. It will be will be fenced and screened with fields; limit the impact of noise and located away from adjacent residen- planting, will include buildings and lighting on adjacent residents and on tial neighborhoods to limit the im- an open yard storage area. more passive areas of the park; and pact of light and noise on residents. allow the existing character of the Game Farm to be extended to the peri- meters of the site. I-6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l+ 'i Al' T? I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 Group Camping for Recreational Vehicles Access Planting Buffers Use of this facility will be limited to groups and will be offered on a reservation only basis. A fee will be charged to cover the cost of mainten- ance. The facility will be fenced to control access when not in use. It is planned that development of the area as shown on the master site plan will be by State Parks. It will be phased according to the availability of funds, either simultaneously with or following development of all other facilities by the City. This facili- ty will then be operated by the City. dO. .0.0 » I Z. ? t Vehicular access on the northwest side of the river will be limited to an entrance on R Street. (The pro- posed and alternative entrance and road alignments are shown in the appendix.) This single entrance is preferred because it can be easily controlled, will be highly visible, will have the least effect on adja- cent neighborhoods and is more appro- priate as a "grand entrance" to a park. Two (2) service vehicle ac- cesses will be provided for the care- taker and river maintenance crews, but these will have locked gates. Emergency vehicles can access at any of the entrances and at walkways. Access on the southwest side of the river will be located along Stuck River Road. Pedestrian access on the northwest side of the river will be limited to R Street and 29th Street. The perimeter adjacent to the neigh- borhood to the south will be fenced from R Street to the river. A pedes- trian gate will be provided at V and 33rd Street. This gate can be locked if traffic becomes a problem in this neighborhood. Trees and shrubs will be planted in linear buffers to help limit the light spill and visual impact of the Sports Field Complex. Plants will include poplars and native and natu- ralized species. one buffer will be located at the edge of the Complex. A second row of planting buffer will be located to the north at the edge of the parking area and to the south at the perimeter of the site. In de- signing the planting buffer at the perimeter of the site, each resident will be consulted about placement of plants. Youth Camp Area This will be a reserve area for informal trails and primitive camping facilities. The Auburn Park Depart- ment will sublease sections of this area to established regional non- profit organizations serving youth. The area will be developed by State Parks, operated by the City and main- tained by the users. CHAPTER TWO: Site Inventory I I I I I I I Site Inventory :........... .... ..: ... .:............:....... : :..? ?..w:?::? Introduction This chapter includes the inventory of natural and constructed conditions that will affect recreation develop- ment of the Auburn Game Farm site. Site Analysis The Auburn Game Farm site encompasses about 150 acres. The site is divided in half by the White River. The river channel occupies about 11.7 acres of the site. Each side of the river has its own distinctive charac- ter. The area northwest of the river is characterized by rolling grasslands. A steep wooded hill rising at the northern perimeter provides a back- drop. The Washington State game farm operations previously occupied about 48 acres of this area. Game farm storage yards and buildings flanking the existing entrance give an indus- trial flavor to the northwest corner. The Headquarters for Washington State Parks Region Five is located in one of two bungalow-type houses on the site. The other house is a rental unit. At present, Washington State Parks wants to maintain use of the buildings and storage yards at the existing entrance, but does not for- see continued use of the houses. Other than the houses and storage areas, all that remains of the game farm operations are some partially demolished coops and tall wire fences that surround the property. The area southeast of the river is characterized by woodlands growing from rocky soil and laced with un- paved roads and trails. Illegal garbage dumping is a problem on this side of the river. History The history of the Auburn Game Farm Park site describes events that have significantly influenced the develop- ment of the White, Stuck, Green and Puyallup River Valleys. When development started in this area, the route of the White River was substantially different from the route the river follows today. (Fig. 2-2) Two miles upstream from the Auburn Game Farm site, the White separated into two distinct channels. About two-thirds of the water con- tinued to flow in the channel called the White; the other third of the water flowed into a separate channel called the Stuck River. The channels ran parallel until they reached the Game Farm site. At this point, the Stuck flowed south and the White flowed north, through what is now Auburn. The White was joined by the Green River then it flowed in a northwesterly direction into the Duwamish and then to Elliott Bay. The Stuck continued south to merge with the Puyallup River and empty into Commencement Bay. The rivers were severe flood hazards. Both had easily eroding banks and swift flowing waters that could carry tons of rocks and debris. Residents along the rivers made attempts to direct flood water flow down the one or the other channel. In 1899, high waters threatened a breakthrough that would have directed all the water into the Stuck River channel. To -ter nt 1-hi-z_ e-iti?anc in niovrn It?fIF.R??i1UN O-Nel?t-1o "O' t ? ? i ?_/ ,. ? (-??Q U.JGI? IGYUFF ICOH Breeto t'ILED NO UI Gl tf G- } MOUMW FQIIIP?? UI U?S C.F ` Ef'? / f? r, WEEK. e0 f' IN UNMa2 • ?1l-ET6 t ?i •?., ,?, ? . ,. tTH f'lf? ?/ IfUEL 12 ?fLTIf?M?lY I'?JNQ?l06U-TY(E `~'-.., ` ".. " IN?olllfill 11??L.EE, i t-VOI?rC?C-?fz? E?51 11 `?f'?E?la? CLt?Pf3? our IN ? CAF N ?/ MOUND CGNDMON----\ - ??,?1p015E toNY? RIr61 % I C?t?- P?tIY `•t? tPYE T1?CK5 G1N CO611) C,FD UJOOIx.Ptt S ...w..... cGTGT QN?, ?? r d ? . VI I ?. .11 Irr?wlllllrwwi Ir I?rr?rrMr Ir w r ? ill ? 111 ^•. ..._?...........?. ltd 8?[u?R1 8E, __. J 1 f3 ' r' _"° 1 Il t ? 15061?S ?r ga?P>ix.E GF CKX-r- WvW VO-V lwdf-ff'fwt-Y OORMP ` C UJ?ta TP?COET efff-L Wohl?IT MYIW?b IN ?,yi? Of T "It, Cam 1M TI tl FFM Orf- PND ALe& OF rt6q-,5 flue THE ac6b"J Pm Po5b (rar)wx off .0 FX-OCF- TD f?D O ..i Sun Path u?u m _-J I. Winter Spring- Summer 1 r rrl?i _ r r +rrMl*ilr+rr M rr?4..."..._'77 ? ? •`. ? ?? F? ?, ?Fxc?nc?N cnr.>5TF'NT ? per (MEP Auburn Game Farm Site Analysis ® 0 200 50? One Acre North Feet Area Jonge*n - Gerrard - McNeal November 1983 Figure 2-1 II-2 1 T 1 T i T 1 i t 1 i 1 ,i 1 i i 1 T County blew up a bluff, intending the debris to keep the White in its chan- nel. The attempt actually resulted in more water flowing down the Stuck. When King County residents built an embankment for controlling floods, tempers flared and Pierce County brought a lawsuit against King County. Pierce County lost the suit on the grounds that King County had the right to protect property. The flood of 1906 changed the course of the events as well as the course of the rivers. As flood water began ,rising that November 14, local resi- dents discovered that a massive log jam had dammed the channel of the White. The entire volume of water was flowing down the Stuck River. King County authorities immediately posted guards to prevent Pierce County resi- dents from blowing up the log jam. Pierce county again brought a law- suit, this time to restore the White to its original channel. The battle in court lasted 6 years. Finally, Pierce County agreed to keep the river if King County helped to pay for flood control. One of the first flood control mea- sures was to build a concrete diver- sion dam to replace the log jam. The Auburn Diversion Dam nearly bisects the Auburn Game Farm site. Rising out of the ground like a nearly buried fortress, the dam has a sig- nificant visual impact on the site. Hydrology and Flood Hazard The White River flows through the Game Farm site in a channel that varies between 200 and 300 feet wide. At the sides of the channel are steep banks. In most places, the banks rise about ten feet above the water sur- face. The banks are maintained as part of the flood control program for the river. Most of the time, the river fills only a small portion of the channel. It follows a braided, sinuous course within the channel between large gravel and rock bars. The river is fairly quickly flowing with occasional calm backwaters. In the summer, it is popular as an innertubing river. Much of the time, the river carries a light sediment that often makes it appear milky and opaque. In winter, usually in Decem- ber and January, the river is open for fishing. The water level of the river is con- trolled by operations at the Mud Mountain Dam and affected by opera- tions at the Puget Power White River flume. At times, the personnel at the dam will release water to be diverted into the flume. This can sometimes cause the water level at the site to rise unexpectedly. However, the in- creased flows are gradual and can be perceived before hazardous conditions result. The Department of Ecology will be posting signs warning of the rising waters. During heavy rains and in the winter, the gravel bars along the river are subject to floods. The river usually stays with- in the banks. In the event of a large flood - a 100 year flood - the south- east area of the site will be inun- dated (Fig. 2-3). Storm water runoff and groundwater movement on the site may be inhibited by the Auburn Diversion Dam. 6. Present day channel I d. Approximate coarse of White River after bank improvements Diversion Dam/ r (circa 1916) ?I '?`?? . 1 ntl 4r+•( tle 1. Approximate coarse of t Approximate White River prior to 1908 of White (lkne River after 1 - - Auburn Game Farm 9. Approximate course of Stuck History Noce: « Indicates River prior to 1909 m o 2011 oo +vlll F(-,.- I direction of flew .t..,..:-.,.r .._.a.u.u.-1 Figure 2- '.?wTli3'L ? Legend u, at Alderwood /[itsap Boil severe erosion has ae Ar•uto /Ritsap material Rver•tt Bandy Gravel Loam: 0-6% Everett Gravelly Loam: 6-15% Ye Mixed Alluvial Land P' Pilchuck Loan Fine Band Rivrwash U` Urban: Altered Soils TT-4 II1 fI ?Il?l,i'hr I Ii l' Ii PC r r s I yl,i?. ^ I I ' II .......... P° .' Auburn Game Farm Soils Jougejan- Gerrard - McNeal N--her 19K3 C 1., ...o O-A I , I stlr° ar.m K e? Legend Fioodway Limited Flood Hazard 100-year Flood Plain 600-year Flood Plain a`y I Auburn Game Farm Flood Hazard ,i.INI _ `INI 9(Ml ()n, Jongejan • Gerrard • McNeal November 19a3 Figure 2-3 ?tlm nr«r ee '. w` ?e?P II 1? Legend Slope E?'D 0-10% Flat to Rolling Ih (.,, \nu 10-18% Stoop, but Walkable Jongejan•Gerrard•McNeal N--her 1983 18% ate very stoop n.•. Figure 2-5 I 1 1 1 1 1 v..: h .. r\:n;^ n h rm ss^>p ¢cavsr?3E^? z:?cni?}1aa// ?. fc?:.. .. Soils Generally, the soils on site are well-drained to excessively drained. The areas where recreation uses may be limited due to soils factors are southeast of the river and on the slopes. Southeast of the river, the texture of the soil tends to be very coarse and rocky (Ma and Pc in Fig. 2-4). It is generally not suitable for playfields, but other activities such as picnicking and trail use will not be limited by this condition. The soils on the slopes are very steep, erosive and hazardous (Afk in Fig. 2- 4). The area northwest of the river (Ur in Fig. 2-4) was probably once very similar to the area southeast of the river, but it has been modified over the years by game farm opera- tions and the cessation of flooding. The surface is less coarse and rocky than the other side of the river and the area should be suitable for a wide range of recreation facilities. Slope Most of the slope is flat to rolling. The one area that has limitations due to slope is the hill on the north. It is very steep, really a cliff in some places, and the underlying soil is very erosive (Fig. 2-5) Vegetation and Wildlife The Auburn Game Farm site has five major vegetative zones (Fig. 2-6). Two areas of the site have little or no vegetation: the gravel and rock bars along the river and the open storage yards at the northwest cor- ner. The rolling area northwest of the river has been maintained as grassland, with a few trees. At a few locations, native vegetation has been disturbed. These areas of mixed wood- land/shrubland are in the process of revegetation. The woodland southeast of the river is in transition from broadleaf-deciduous forest to conif- erous-evergreen forest. The overstory vegetation is primarily alder. Much of the alder is nearing the end of its lifespan and young Douglas firs stand ready to take its place. Most of the steeply sloping hill on the north is covered by a dense Douglas fir forest, which helps to protect the erosive soils. The Auburn Game Farm site potentially is a good wildlife habitat. The diversity of wildlife species and numbers of individuals is always greater at the interface of habitats or vegetative zones, especially where visible edges are formed. The Game Farm site has a river and five dis- tinct vegetative zones with a vari- ety of edge conditions as a result. Further, it is linked to a much larger wildlife habitat (the upstream white River valley is only sparsely populated). a.ln .IreN N ^? r _ \ • •4 • 331d 81,.11 e. i) r, I Legend ?4e! Trees Sparse or No Vegetation Grassland Mixed Woodland/Shrubland Transitional Woodland Mixed Coniferous Woodland t Auburn Game Farm Vegetation 11Lm??? {,. MINI -` JWNI Ih„ .longe. n•Gerrard•McNeal November 199:1 \q Rz i--- j M2 R2 i _R3_. 1 Rd i j r•?' 1._. It Ill I Itul i Rdi rr -_-.-_-._.-- -R2 R4 RT UNCL Auburn Game Farm Legend 2 sagle Family Re„. R TP_ Ml.hue wane r„rk n:....., R3 Thu-Family Re.. Ml... see„cv Indu„triNl 4 Multi-Family Res. - Med. I)e-ity PL 1'uhlir V„„„i-Public _Rb Multi Family Roe. high D--IY UNCL 11.0 nifhal RT Mobile Home P.rk Uiaict ?e)ning .loagejaa • ()errald • McNeal Nuvemlwr 1»»7 \ \ II Fe s IC)w.n Note: Exlsting bouses on site are served by well • septic tanks Legend /I,- f? I -,- g e`'d -- Electric Powerlinse (on poles) •--.----••. Bower •••••••• Storm Bower Water System Auburn Game Farm Utilities longejen • Gerrard • McNeal November 1993 Figure 2- to Auburn Way ?•1 R..I do u.l Wu?tl.l er,•• [tr `par etr.a. Petro RonN i t..•• 99th Street BE, Collector f ~ 'v Arterial, to it .e I"'at a U 111 1 1 Dh d a A Street ? e . . t w . I p RR ..d Trall.• / Use( 11.1.1 Dlrt [o. d. t Tr.il• p ,N s.d !i ii1111 1 341d .u«I It I I 8 , No Outlet tl.l I ?t i . / $? e s 1 ... ` Tr.ll. T 010 ie ; i m N. [pod. ?V sl ? i?, oQ.re O Auburn Game Farm Me [..d. Circulation 11 '_INI dMl IN 14` I NI to Lake Tapp* ?.lih t,,l longejan • Gerrard • McNeal November I9N3 II-6 Figure 2-8 Figure 2-9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { .................... ... ... .. .: ?.t..: x... ..............n...... _..,.......... x..O...v... .......:..?. ....................... ?............ r........ .................................... n,+{?.N, n'..aD... h.0.#?.....?... .... .. ? :::::.n.. Tiii: is iiii'i'- i:;:?: •i:::v.... . Land Use The area around the site is zoned primarily low to medium density resi- dential, with large areas of unclass- ified zoning to the south (Fig. 2-7). Single-family home neighborhoods bor- der most of the west edge of the site. A large area of multifamily housing is located across R Street, west of the site. Although undevel- oped, much of the area east of the site is zoned for mobile home parks. one area directly north of the site is zoned heavy industrial. This is a gravel excavation that is, at pres- ent, not in operation. There is a very large and active gravel excavation south of the site. Unities The existing houses on the site are served by a well and septic tanks. The city has sewer, water and storm sewer service available along the perimeter of the northwest quadrant of the site. Puget Power provides electrical power. Circulation R Street is classified as a secondary arterial, it has moderate to heavy traffic with a number of large trucks during the day. In 1980, the daily traffic volume on R Street south of 29th Street was 7,860 and the daily traffic volume on R Street north of 29th Street was 10,415. During the summer, traffic tends to be heavier as R Street is the major route out of town to Lake Tapps, a popular recrea- tion area. The 1982 Comprehensive Traffic Plan for the City of Auburn proposes that R Street be improved to a full five lane arterial with a center two-way turning lane. The existing R Street has a rating of Level of Service (LOS) C, which - according to the Comprehensive Traf- fic Plan - is generally the objective for quality traffic flow in urban areas. LOS D is acceptable for peak- hour traffic. The future LOS for R Street has been the subject of recent Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) completed for projects proposed in the area south of the proposed Game Farm site. According to the Mt. Rainier Vista EIS, in 1990, the pro- jected daily traffic volumes for R Street south of 29th Street is 26,900. This figure includes the projected traff is from the proposed Mt. Rainier Vista project as well as other projects proposed for the area. The document states that with these. volumes, and with the proposed im- provements to the roadway, R Street - at the Game Farm- will be operating at 588 of its capacity. During peak- hour, R Street will have a rating of LOS D. 29th Street is a collector arterial with direct access to A Street. (A Street is part of East Valley Highway which is still an important north/south route through the valley). Auburn Public Works Depart- ment indicates that a signal is plan- ned for the intersection of R Street and 29th Street. When the signal will be installed is undetermined. Residents report that 29th Street east of R Street also has heavy truck traffic when the gravel excavation is in operation. Access from one side of the river to the other is via R Street and SE Stuck River Road. Stuck River road is classified as a collector arte- rial, but it is unpaved and has no outlet. Metro has one bus route that touches the northwest corner of the site, This route goes through the residen- tial area into downtown Auburn and out East Valley Highway to Kent and then Tukwila. On site, northwest of the river, circulation is limited to one paved road and a few unsanctioned, but heavily used trails. Southwest of the river, the woodlands are heavily laced with dirt roads and trails. CHAPTER THREE: Plan and Program Development I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Program and Plan Development The Auburn Park and Introduction Recreation Plan This chapter documents program plan Program development for the Auburn development from the initial phases Game Farm site began with the Auburn to the adoption of the final master Park and Recreation Plan. plan. In 1981, the City of Auburn adopted a comprehensive park and recreation plan intended to guide the acquisi- tion, development and maintenance of recreation lands from 1981 to 1996. one of the six primary recommenda- tions of the plan was for Auburn to pursue the use of the Auburn Game Farm site for park purposes. The park purposes outlined in the Park and Recreation Plan included: three lighted softball fields, one lighted baseball field, four soccer fields (two with all-weather surface and lights), parking, restrooms, exercise course, basketball courts and other recreation facilities. Public Involvement The primary contact with the public was through three public meetings. However, people other than those who attended the meetings became involved in the master planning process. The project was brought to public atten- tion through advertisement of public meetings, a discussion on a local radio talk show, a series of news- paper articles in three local news- papers, and mailings from the Parks and Recreation Department. All of these, in addition to 'word of mouth', led to a number of phone calls and letters to the Auburn Park and Recreation Department. The First Public Meeting The Schematic Plan The first public meeting for the Auburn Game Farm master plan was held on November 18, 1983. 85 persons were in attendance. The meeting began with a brief introduction followed by a presentation of the site inventory information. The remainder of the meeting was conducted as an open forum in which anyone could present suggestions for development of the park. Also, a form for written re- sponses was given to those at the meeting. A program was developed based on Park Board and Parks staff, public in- volvement and the Auburn Park and Recreation Plan recommendations. As the program must reflect the poten- tials and constraints of the site as well as the needs and desires of the community, this program was modified in the process of developing a schem- at Lc site plan. With the approval of Auburn Park Board, the schematic plan and prelim- inary program were presented to the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council in December, 1983, and at a second public meeting on January 12, 1984. The public meeting began with a syn- opsis of the information presented at the first public meeting and an over- view of the schematic plan. Then the meeting was opened for public discus- sion. 105 people were in attendance. III-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I The Preliminary Plan The plan was refined based on com- ments at the presentation of the schematic plan, and at the direction of the Park Board and City staff. The resulting preliminary plan was pre- pared for review and approval by the community, and final adoption by the City Council. The final public meeting, similar in format to the previous meetings, was held on February 7, 1984. After the plan was presented, the meeting was opened for discussion. Generally, those in attendance highly favored the plan. This was confirmed by the written responses to a questionnaire distributed at the end of the meet- ing. (Completed questionnaires are on file with the Auburn Park and Recrea- tion Department.) Following the public meeting, the preliminary plan was formally ap- proved by the Park Board. Prior to final adoption of the plan by the City Council, the plan was reviewed and accepted by the follow- ing: Washington State Parks and Rec- reation Commission Auburn Public Works Department Auburn Planning Department Auburn Planning Commission Planning and Community Develop- ment Committee of the City Coun- CL1 I I I I I I i A APPENDIX 1 1 ] ) 1 1 ? t 1 ) 1 1 ? 1 1 1 1 1 1 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost - Entire Project --- Item Description --------------------------- Unit ----- ----- Cost/Unit No./Units ------------ --------- ---- Total ----------- 1. SITE PREPARATION Demolition ALLOW 17000.00 Clearing ACRE 800.00 1 800.00 Grading ACRE 1000.00 43 43000.00 Topsoil CY 12.00 4000 48000.00 2. UTILITIES Electrical service (not incl. lighting) LF 10.00 2600 26000.00 Water service (not incl. irrigation) LF 6.50 2600 16900.00 Sewer LF 11.00 1400 15400.00 Storm drainage LF 7.00 2600 18200.00 Catch basins EA 1500.00 8 12000.00 Fire hydrants EA 1150.00 2 2300.00 3. PLANTING Trees Deciduous EA 150.00 690 103500.00 Conifers EA 50.00 1650 82500.00 Shrub/groundcover SF 0.60 40000 24000.00 Grass ACRE 4000.00 23 92000.00 Rough Grass ACRE 2000.00 6 12000.00 4. IRRIGATION Sports fields ACRE 11000.00 8 88000.00 Planting areas & grass ACRE 9000.00 27 243000.00 5. ROADS, PATHS, PARKING Asphalt road (20' wide) SY 8.75 6700 58625.00 Asphalt parking SY 8.75 5600 49000.00 Asphalt paths (10' wide) Sy 9.75 13500 131625.00 Crushed rock path (10' wide) SF 0.35 12000 4200.00 Curbing LF 6.00 6400 38400.00 Striping ALLOW 1000.00 Item Description Unit Cost/Unit No./Units Total ----------------------------------- ----- ------------ --------- --------------- 6. FENCING Security fence LF Sports field fence LF Vehicular gate EA Pedestrian gate EA 7. BUILDINGS Restroom/Concession ALLOW Restroom ALLOW 8. SHELTERS Group picnic ALLOW 9. PICNIC AREAS Picnic sites EA 10. SPORTS & PLAY EQUIPMENT Tot lot EA Children's play area ALLOW Baseball field (surface & equip.) EA Softball field (surface & equip.) EA Softball/soccer field (all-weather surface & equip.) EA Soccer field (all-weather surface & equip.) EA Soccer field (grass surface & equip.) EA Tennis courts (incl. nets, fence, surface) EA Basketball Court EA Multi-purpose court EA Benches EA IV-2 10.00 2600 26000.00 8.00 3300 26400.00 1000.00 3 3000.00 600.00 1 600.00 85000.00 65000.00 32000.00 800.00 29 23200.00 2500.00 2 5000.00 45000.00 40000.00 1 40000.00 30000.00 2 60000.00 60000.00 1 60000.00 34000.00 1 34000.00 15000.00 2 30000.00 15000.00 4 60000.00 5000.00 1 5000.00 3000.00 1 3000.00 400.00 20 8000.00 ? i l 1 i 1 Item Description ----------------------------------- 1 Unit ----- 1 I Cost/Unit ------------ ) 1 ----------- -- No./Units --------- -- 1 ) 1 } 1 I ) l Total ------------- Fitness course ALLOW 8000.00 Bicycle racks EA 500.00 4 2000.00 Drinking fountains EA 600.00 4 2400.00 Trash receptacles EA 200.00 20 4000.00 11. LIGHTING Parking & paths ALLOW 85600.00 Baseball/softball field EA 100000.00 3 300000.00 Tennis courts (4) EA 50000.00 1 50000.00 Soccer field EA 100000.00 2 200000.00 12. SIGNS Identification & directional ALLOW 6500.00 Interpretive ALLOW 10000.00 13. OTHER Interpretive display/shelter ALLOW 90000.00 RV Group camping ALLOW 136000.00 Amphitheater (grass) ALLOW -- 1000.00 ------------- TOTAL* 2634150.00 Does not include: 12% taxes, fees, youth camping area, Contingency 316098.00 informal trails, or adjacent -- ------------- street improvements. 2950248.00 ------------------------------------- 1 n-, 4 i E ` •r: f • i .; : :• 33FD 9E IJ . ?.• .•• .r< ?• t •l ::f : •:: f ;1:.• r ii PHASE I r j Auburn Game Farm o too 20o aoo one L - ' - r - - - - - North rbet Area Jongejan • Gerrard -McNeal ??? SSI IV-4 ! 1 ? ? ? ? ? 1 I 1 t 1 f { 1 t t ? ? Estimate of Probable Construction Cost - Phase ---- Item Description ------------------------------- Unit ----- Cost/Unit ------------ No./Units --------- -- Total ------------- 1. SITE PREPARATION Demolition ALLOW 17000.00 Clearing ACRE 800.00 1 800.00 Grading ACRE 1000.00 12 12000.00 Topsoil CY 12.00 720 8640.00 2. UTILITIES Electrical service (not incl. lighting) LF 10.00 1800 18000.00 Water service (not incl. irrigation) LF 6.50 1800 11700.00 Sewer LF 11.00 600 6600.00 Storm drainage LF 7.00 1400 9800.00 Catch basins EA 1500.00 4 6000.00 Fire hydrants EA 1150.00 1 1150.00 3. PLANTING Trees Deciduous EA 150.00 250 37500.00 Conifers EA 50.00 600 30000.00 Shrub/groundcover SF 0.60 14400 8640.00 Grass ACRE 4000.00 9 36000.00 Rough Grass ACRE 2000.00 6 12000.00 4. IRRIGATION Planting areas & grass ACRE 9000.00 13 117000.00 5. ROADS, PATHS, PARKING Asphalt road (20' wide) SY 8.75 6700 58625.00 Asphalt parking SY 8.75 3200 28000.00 Asphalt paths (10' wide) SY 9.75 4000 39000.00 Crushed rock path (10' wide) SF 0.35 12000 4200.00 Curbing LF 6.00 3000 18000.00 Striping ALLOW 600.00 ---- Item Description ------------------------------ Unit - ----- Cost/Unit ------------ No./Units --------- 6. FENCING Security fence LF 10.00 2600 Vehicular gate EA 1000.00 3 Pedestrian gate EA 600.00 1 7. BUILDINGS Restroom ALLOW 8. SHELTERS Group picnic ALLOW 9. PICNIC AREAS Picnic sites EA 800.00 22 10. SPORTS & PLAY EQUIPMENT Children's play area ALLOW Softball/soccer field (all-weather surface & equip.) EA 60000.00 1 Soccer field (all-weather surface & equip.) EA 34000.00 1 Benches EA 400.00 10 Bicycle racks EA 500.00 2 Drinking fountains EA 600.00 4 Trash receptacles EA 200.00 10 11. LIGHTING Parking & paths ALLOW Soccer field EA 100000.00 2 12. SIGNS Identification & directional ALLOW 13. OTHER Amphitheater (grass) ALLOW Does not include: taxes, fees, youth camping area, informal trails, or adjacent street improvements. IV-6 TOTAL* 12% Contingency I # 1 Total 26000.00 3000.00 600.00 65000.00 32000.00 17600.00 45000.00 60000.00 34000.00 4000.00 1000.00 2400.00 2000.00 34240.00 200000.00 6500.00 1000.00 --------------- 1015595.00 121871.40 --------------- 1137466.40 1 1 1 i f ! Turn-around ui O ? V ? r iy t Iti M CIO Sidewalk rte---? Lln hu w .. , - -- -- ----'? ------------------------------------- __:?__ _z..? ?'_3_ ------?----------- -------- ------------- R Street ? E? -???? ------------------------- --! Acceleration Lane l Sidewalk Crosswalks Median ui w Bus Stop M? _I O to O CO ui G; 0 MMM ?I 'O co mjl._ Proposed Park Entrance 4? North -r -7 'n Turn-around IV-8 ui ai 0 0 Q?1 t Sidewalk ------------------------- -- ---- - --- aa?_---=-------------------------_?--- ---------- ---- ----- ------- ------------- R_Str si_ ----- Crosawalks Sidewalk Bua Stop W ui vi M '^ v/ M M M Z « 0 CO « !u aj m 0 v a? Alternate Park Entrance 40 North