The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3091 RESOLUTION N0.3 0 9 1 AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIERCE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF AUBURN, RELATING TO THE USE AND ALLOCATION OF GRANTS FOR BUILDABLE LANDS EVALUATIONS UNDER REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON (RCW) 36.70A.215. WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.215 ("Buildable Lands") requires counties which are subject to the Growth Management Act, in consultation with their cities and towns, to adopt a review and evaluation program which will, among other things, (a) determine whether there is sufficient suitable land to accommodate projected population growth; (b) determine the actual density of housing that has been constructed and the actual amount of land that has been developed for commercial or industrial purposes within the urban growth areas since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan or last periodic evaluation; (c) based on (b), determine the amount of land needed for commercial growth, industrial growth and housing for the remaining portion of the 20-year planning period; and (d) based on the above considerations, determine whether there is any inconsistency between actual growth and the growth that was envisioned in the County-Wide Planning Policies, city and county comprehensive plans and development regulations, and the Growth Management Act; and Resolution No. 3091 May 19, 1999 Page 1 WHEREAS, the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) provides grants to counties to carry out this review and evaluation program; and WHEREAS, Pierce County receives a yearly grant from CTED for this purpose; and WHEREAS, Pierce County and its cities and towns agree that these grant monies would be best used if allocated in part to the County and in part to its cities and towns; and WHEREAS, the Pierce County Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC) is a technical subcommittee to the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) and includes staff representatives from the County and the cities and towns within it; and WHEREAS, because of the expertise and broad representation of the GMCC and PCRC, the decision as to how the grant funds should be allocated and used should be made by the County on the recommendation of the PCRC; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IN A REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH RESOLVES THAT: SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Auburn, Washington, are herewith authorized to execute an agreement between Pierce County and the Resolution No. 3091 May 19, 1999 Page 2 City of Auburn relating to the use and allocation of Grants for Buildable Lands Evaluations under Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.70A.215. A copy of said Amendment is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. ~da 1999. DATED and SIGNED this ~ y of-Me~,, CITY OF AUBURN CHARLES A. ~OOTH MAYOR Resolution No. 3091 May 19, 1999 Page 3 ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Resolution No. 3091 May 19, 1999 Page 4 SEP 18 2000 Return Address: 21ZlIZt00829001321 City of Auburn pACZF:C NI4 TTT RG la.ee P~GE ee= OF ee6 25 West Main St. e612~/zeee Auburn, WA 98001 KZNG COUNTY, RECORDER'S COVER SHEET Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE AND ALLOCATION OF GRANTS FOR BUILDABLE LANDS EVALUATIONS. (RES 309f) Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Grantor(s)lBorrower(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) -- CITY OF AUBURN O Grantee/Assignee/Beneficiary: (Last name first) PIERCE COUNTY Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) N/A [] Additional legal is on page of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number N/A ~~a~ Assessor Tax ~ not yet assigned m AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIERCE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF AUBURN, RELATING TO THE .USE AND ALLOCATION OF GRANTS FOR BUILDABLE LANDS EVALUATIONS UNDER REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON (RCW) 36.70A.2'15. WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.215 requires counties which are subject to the Growth Management Act, in consultation with their cities and towns, to adopt a review and evaluation program which will, among other things, (a) determine whether there is sufficient suitable land to accommodate projected population growth; (b) determine the actual density of housing that has been constructed and the actual amount of land that has been developed for commercial or industrial purposes within the urban growth areas since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan or last periodic evaluation; (c) based on (b), determine the amount of land needed for commercial growth, industrial growth and housing for the remaining portion of "" the 20-year planning period; and ~ (d) based on the above considerations, determine whether there is any ~ inconsistency between actual growth and the growth that was envisioned in the County-Wide Planning Policies, city and county co comprehensive plans and development regulations, and the Growth c_-~ Management Act; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) provides grants to counties to carry out this review and evaluation program; and WHEREAS, Pierce County receives a yearly grant from CTED for this purpose; and WHEREAS, Pierce County and its cities and towns agree that these grant monies would be best used if allocated in part to the County and in part to its cities and towns; and Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 3091 Page 1 WHEREAS, the Pierce County Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC) is a technical subcommittee to the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) and includes staff representatives from the County and the cities and towns within it; and WHEREAS, because of the expertise and broad representation of the GMCC and PCRC, the decision as to how the grant funds should be allocated and used should be made by the County on the recommendation of the PCRC; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IN A REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH RESOLVES THAT: PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 39.34 RCW, THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, PIERCE COUNTY (COUNTY) AND THE CITY OF AUBURN AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County is the recipient of a yearly grant from CTED to carry out the review and evaluation program set out in RCW 36.70A.215 and "' summarized above. 2. The County will allocate these funds each year among itself and its cities and towns in the following manner: ,:o (a) By the date set by the County Executive, each city and town ~ desiring an allocation of these grant funds for the applicable ~ yearly cycle shall submit a proposed scope of work and ,(::::~ . c:~ requested allocation amount to the County Executive and to the PCRC. The scope of work shall be consistent with RCW 36.70A.215 and any applicable rules promulgated by CTED. Further, the scope of work should be designed to accomplish the tasks set out in the document entitled "Pierce County Buildable Lands Procedures for Collecting and Monitoring Data", as amended, by the Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department with consultation from the Pierce County Growth Management Coordinating Committee. Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 3091 Page 2 (b) After receiving from PCRC its recommended allocation and scope of work for each jurisdiction, the County Council shall fix the amount to be allocated to and the scope of work for each city and town. The County Council is not bound by the decision of the PCRC, but shall give considerable weight to its recommendation. (c) After the Council has made this decision, the County shall promptly distribute the allocation to each jurisdiction after it has received the grant funds from CTED. 2. The County is under no obligation to distribute any grant funds until it has actually received the funds from CTED. 3. The City of Auburn shall use any funds distributed under this Agreement as specified in the scope of work approved by the County, and consistently with Chapter 36.70A RCW, and any applicable rules. 4. The City of Auburn shall submit a status report to the Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department by June 30 of each year documenting the tasks which were completed, pursuant to the scope of work, with allocated funds during the prior twelve months. 5. The County may withhold any allocated funds from the City of Auburn if the City of Auburn has used any previously allocated funds inconsistently with the applicable scope of work, Chapter 36.70A RCW, rules promulgated by CTED, or this Agreement. 6. This Agreement shall be effective on the date signed by both parties and shall continue in effect through December 31, 2002. However, either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience on 30 days notice to the other. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, the City of Auburn remains obligated to use any funds distributed to it under this Agreement consistently with all of its terms. In case of termination for any reason, the County is not obligated to distribute any grant funds to the City of Auburn beyond those actually distributed before the date of termination. Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 3091 Page 3 7. Any notices given to the County under this Agreement shall be given to the Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department at 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409-7490. Any notices given to the City of Auburn under this Agreement shall be given to the City of Auburn, City of Auburn Planning Department, 25 W. Main Street, Auburn, WA 98001. 8. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. The venue for any legal action to enforce this Agreement shall be Superior Court for Pierce County, Washington. 9. Each person signing below warrants that he or she does so under the authority of the jurisdiction's legislative authority. Agreement on the ? ~ , . CITY OF AUBURN ~ CHARLES A. BOOTH -- MAYOR ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, Gity Olerk Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 3091 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PIERCE COUNTY ,, imen ' ~ nty Executive C ief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 3091 Page 5