HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM VIII-B-1
TYOF_
ACIUBUI~IV AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
WAShIINGTON
Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4585 Date: April 13, 2010
Department: Planning and Attachments: Resolution No. 4585 Budget Impact: N/A
Development
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4585.
Background Summary:
Beginning in December 2008 through summer 2009, City staff attended the King County Growth Targets
Committee meetings to discuss the 10-year population (housing units) and employment (jobs) targets
allocation process. Planning and Community Development Committee (PCDC) were briefed several
times during this process (March 23, 2009; May 11, 2009; June 8, 2009; July 27, 2009; and August 10,
2009)
While the King County Growth Targets Committee was meeting, regular briefings were provided to the
King County Planning Council (April 15, 2009, July 15, 2009, and September 16, 2009). The King County
Planning Council (GMPC) is the committee that recommends approval of amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies. The GMPC took action, recommending approval of the amendments at their October
28, 2009 meeting. Auburn has been allocated a housing unit target of 9,620 and an employment target of
19,350 jobs. As presented to the PCDC, the City has sufficient capacity through existing zoning to
accommodate this growth. The proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies
were then forwarded to the Metropolitan King County Council for action on behalf of unincorporated King
County. The County Council approved and ratified the amendments on January 25, 2010 and became
effective on February 14, 2010.
Amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by
ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent
of the population of King County. A city is deemed to have ratified the amendments unless, within 90
days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. The
Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the resolution at their April 12, 2010
meeting.
A3.4.1
Reviewed by Council 8 Committees: Reviewed by Departments 8 Divisions:
❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑ Building ❑ M&O
❑ Airyort ❑ Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor
❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Serv. ❑ Finance ❑ Parks
❑ Human Services Z Planning & CD ❑ Fire Z Planning
❑ Park Board ❑ Public Works ❑ Legal ❑ Police
❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other ❑ Public Works ❑ Human Resources
❑ Information Services
Action:
CommitteeApproval: ❑Yes ❑No
Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing
Referred to Until / / -
Tabled Until
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Sn der
Meetin Date: A ril 19, 2010 Item Number: VI11.6.1
AUBURN * M02E THAN YOU IMAGfNED
RESOLUTION NO. 4 5 8 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE AMENDMENTS TO
THE KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING
POLICIES
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became
effective (Chapter 36.70A Revised Code of Washington); and
WHEREAS, under federal and state law, the Puget Sound Regional Council
(PSRC) has specific responsibilities for transportation and growth management
planning; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Office of Financial Management forecasts
population of counties and issues those forecasts every five years; and
WHEREAS, counties and cities collaborate to allocate that forecasted population
every ten years; and
WHEREAS, PSRC adopted VISION 2040 as the growth management,
environmental, economic, and transportation vision for the central Puget Sound region;
and
WHEREAS, VISION 2040 provides a common framework for the region's
Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Regional Economic Strategy, as well as
countywide planning policies and local comprehensive plans; and
WHEREAS, VISION 2040 established regional geographies for accommodating
the regions growth over the next thirty years and the City of Auburn is designated a
Core City; and
WHEREAS, the Core City geography is anticipated to accommodate thirty-two
percent of the Puget Sound region's growth; and
Resolution No. 4585
March 23, 2010
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the City participated in the amendment process and helped develop
the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies through
participation in regional meetings through Suburban Cities Association; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning
Policies were reviewed and recommended approval by the Growth Management
Planning Council; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies must
be ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county
governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified the
amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County and became effective on
February 14, 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies as shown by Exhibit A to this resolution are hereby ratified by the City of
Auburn.
Section 2. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Clerk of
the Metropolitan King County Council.
Section 3. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Resolution No. 4585
March 23, 2010
Page 2 of 3
Dated and signed this day of 12010.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
IIIAI(Z IA, P
4I B. id, ' y tto ey
Resolution No. 4585
March 23, 2010
Page 3 of 3
Exhibit A
, .
King County
Metropolitan,King County Council Anne _Noris; Clerk'oftfie Council '
King Co'unty Courthouse 516.ThlydAvenue; Room W1039
Seattle,, WA98104'3272 `
Te1:206-296-10i0Faz; 206-205-8165- I
TfY/TDD: 206-296-3024 ~
Emall: anne.noris@kingcounty.gov! ~
Web: ivww.kingcounty:goy/council/clerk ~
~
~
I
february 17; 2010
The Honorable Pete Lewis
Cify:of Auburri
25 Wes4 Main Street I
Auburn, WA 98001-4998 I
Dear Mayor Lewis:
We:are pleased.to forward for your considerafion and ratification the enclosed I~
amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP).
On January. 25; 2010, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and I
ratified the amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. The
Ordinances became effective February 14, 2010. Copies ofithe King County
Council staff reports, ordinances and Growth Management Planning Council
motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of theseamendments.
In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, • i
amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at ,
least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of
the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will ,
be deemed tohave ratified the amendments to the GPP unless, within 90 days of 'adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove #he ~
amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is '
Saturday, May 15, 2010. ~
If you adopt anylegislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the
legislation by the close of business, Friday, May 14,,2010,_to Anne Noris, Clerk of I
the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA "
98104, anne.noris@kingcounty.gov. j
i
i
If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please
contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of
Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Rick Bautista,
Metropolitan King County Council Staff, at 206-296-0329.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
~
Bob Ferguson, Chair pow Constantine !
Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive '
~
i
Enclosures ~
cc: King County City Planning Directors '
Suburban Cities Association
Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES
Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Environment and Transportation Committee
(ETC) i
~
i
(
. . . ,
I
,
~
;
;
;
/
November 19, 2009
The Hoiiorable Dow Constantine
Chair, Kine, Cowtty Coancil
Room 1200
COUR"fl(OUSE
Dear Councilmember Constan[ine:
1 am pleased to submit two motions that have been approved 6y the GroMh Mauagement
Plvining Council (Gn4PC). Under tlie interlocal aggrccment that established the GIMPC;
motions are first approved by GMPC. King County Council must then approve die inotions
an(I ratiF}, it fur the unincorporated area. Finally, the motions are sent to all of the cities in King
Cowtty for ratification. There are no fiscal impacts to King County goaeiiunent as a result of
[hese motions.
The altached hwo motions are the result of regional cooperation. Each received unanimous
approval b}' the Growth Manageiiient Planning Council; howcver the City oY Seallle
representatives abstained fiom voting on Niotion 09-2. The first of these N[otions, GN(PC
Nlotion 09-I, adopis a work plaii and schedule to address die policy framework for allocation of
regional serviczs and facilities. The second Motion, G\4PC Motion 09-2, amends the
Countywide Planning Policies updating existing policies ro provicle for housing and
employment fargets fm the period 2006-203 L This motion also amends Table LU-1 of tlie
Countywide Planning Yolicies by replacing the existing 14ousehold and Employmenl Growtli
Targets for tlie 2001-2022 period with new Housing and Gmplopment Growth Targets for the
2006-2031 period.
"Che [[onorabte Dow Cunslantinc
Novembcr 19. 2009
Page 2 .
G'or Finther infonnation regarding tttis transmitt<iI, please contact Stephanie \•Varden, [)ircctor,
Department of Department nnd Environmental Services, at 206-296-6700 or by email at
Stcphanie.warden(ckim*countv,oov.
Sincerely,
Kurt Triplett
King County Executive
Lnclosures
cc: King County Councihuembars
ATTN: Tom Bristow, liiterim Chief of Slaff
Aruie Noris, Cleck of the Council
Frank Abe, Commuuications Director
Beth Goldberg, Deputy Director, Office of t'vtanagement 1nd Budget
Stephanie 1Varden, Director, Departmenl of Developnient and l;nviromnental
Services (DDES)
Paul Reitenbach, Compreliensive Plan Project ivtanager, DllFS
i
;
i
I
. . . , i
~
K1NG COUNTY 1 -00 K1119 t0ll„t.c,~~'4011<,
a stv 1111M Ac<nuo - ' Scaltltll':\•)SIJJ
Signature Report
Kirg County
January 25, 2010
Ordinance 16747
Proposcd Yu. 2009-0641.1 Spousors F(ague and Phillips .
1 AN ORDINANCG 1clopting ameudments to the
2 Countywide Plauning Policies; adopting a work plan and
3 schedufe to address pulicies rel<itec( to aliocation oFregional
4 services, and adopting new liousing anct employment
5 growlh targets, and ratif}'ing Ihe amended Cotmtyxvide
6 Planning Policies for wtincotporated King County; and
7 amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and
8 K.C.C. 20.10.030 aud Ordinance 101I50, Section 4, as
9 amended, ancf K.C.C. 20.I0.040.
10 DE IT 02DAINED BY'CHE COUNCIL OP K[NG COCIN7'Y:
11 SECT(ON L F'indittgs: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted ancl ratified tlie Gro~~lh
. . . ;
13 MTnagement Planniug Counci( recanmended King Cowity 2012 - County%vide Plannin2 ~
14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, uncler Orclinluce 10450. ~
15 B. The metropolitan King County cowicil adopted aud ratjfied the Phase II
i
is amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August I5, 1994, under Ordinance ~
17 11446. I
i
I
18 C. The Growtfi Management Planning Council met on Ocrober 28, 2009 and
19 voted to recommeud amendments to die King County County%vide Planning Policies,
r..
1
Ordinance 16747 20 adoptina. n4otion 09-1 appruti inc awork plan and schedute to address diz polic}'
21 liamework for ailocation ot regional services artd lAcilities as sliown in :\uachment to
22 lhis oi'dinance attci attopting \•(otion 09-2 amendiitg'fable LU-1 of th,~ Cuunt}~%Vidc
23 Planning Policies and approving relatecf policy amendments as shown on Attachment Q
24 to Ihis Ordinauce. .
25 SGCI'(ON 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.CC. 20.10.030 are
26 each IlereUy amended to read as follows: ,
27 A. 'Che Phase U E\mendments to the King County 2012 Cowityu ide Pllnning
28 Poticies attached to Ordinance 11446 are ltere6y approved and adopted.
29 B. Tlie Pliase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planninf'
30 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
31 G. 1'he Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning ~
I
32 Policies are amended; as shown by Attachmcnt 1 to Ordinance 12421.
33 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Pliuniog
34 Policies are airiended, as sliown by Attlctiments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
i
35 E. The Phase iI Amendroents to the I<ing County 2012 - Countywide Planning ~
36 Policies are amended, as sliown by Attaclvnents I through 4 ro Ordinance I 3415. ~
37 F. The Phase ]I Amendments to Uie King County 2012 - Countywide Piauning
38 Policies are amendecl, as shown by Attachuieiits 1 tlirough 3 to Ordinance 13355. ~
39 G. Tlie Phase II Amendments to the Kiiig County 2012 - County"vide Planning
;
40 Policies are amended, as shown by Attaciiment I to Ordinance 14390: i
41 H. The Phase II Amendments to.the King County 2012 - Countywide Plamiing ~
42 Policies are amended, as shown by Attaclnnent ] to Ordinance 14391.
2
Ordinance 16747 43 L The Phase (f :\meudmznts to Ihe King Cuunty 2012 - Countywidc Plamiin."
44 Policies are amendecl, as sltown by t\ttactmien[ 1 to Orilinance 14392.
45 J. "fhe Phase r\mendments lo the King Cowity )_012 - Cotuttywicte Planning
46 Policies are amenctecl, as sliuwn by E\ttlchnten[ l to Ordinance 14652.
47 K. The Phase ;lmendments to the King County 2012 - Couutywide Planning
48 Policies are amendect, as shown by ,Sttachmeuts l throuoh = to Ordinance 14653.
49 L. The Phase If tlmendments to the King Cowity 2012 - Countywide Planning
50 Poficies are amended, as shown by Atflchment l to Ordinance I=1654.
51 b(. The Pfiase II tameu<huents to the King Cowily 2012 - Countywide Planning
52 Policies are ainended; as sliown by Attachment l to.Ordinaiice 14655.
53 N. The Phase II Aiuendments to [he Kin-, Counry 2012 - CountyNvide Ptanning
54 Policics are amended, as sliown by Attachments ( and 2 to Orclinance 14656.
55 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 201 Z- Countywicie Plannino
56 Policies are amended, as shoivn by f\ttachmetit A to Orditiance 14844.
57 P. The Phase II f\mendments [o the Kina. County 2012 - Countywide Plannina
58 Polieies are amended as shown by. Altachments A, B anc(,C to Ordinance 15121.. .
59 Q. The Phase 11 Amendinents to die King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
60 Policies are amende.N, as shown by Attachmeut A to Ordinance I S 122.
61 R. The Phase Il Amendments to the King Couuty 2012 - Cowitpwide Planning
62 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123.
63 S. Phase 11 Amendments to the King Coimty 2012 - Countywide Planniug
64 Pol icies are amendecl, as shown by Attactunents A and B to-0rdinance 15426.
3
Ordinance 16747 .
65 T. Phase Anrenchuents to the Kino County 2012 - Countywide Plannin<_
66 Policies 'are amended, as shown by AttAchments A, [3, and C m Ordinlnce 15709.
67 U. Phase I[ tlmendments to the King County 20_ 12 - County-xidz Plamning
GS Policies are amended, as s(town by Attachment to Ordinance 16056.
69 V. Pliase 1[ Ameudments ro tlie King County20 ( 2- CountyMde Planning
70 Policies are ameniled, as shown by Attachments A, B, C, D, 8, F and G to Urcfiaancc
n 1CI51.
72 W. Pliase If rlmendments to ttie Kiug Coutit} 2012 - Countywide Planning I
73 Poticies are amendecl as shoxvn Uy Attacfunent A to Ordinance 1034, and tliose itzms
74 numUered I though 11, 13 auct 15 1s shown on Attacliment Q to Ordinance 16334. are
75 hereby ratified un behalf of the popt-dation of unincorporated King Countv. 'I hose items
76 nuinbered 12 and 14, showa as struck-through on Attactuuent I3 to Orclinance 16334, are
i
77 nUt rntified_ .
~
I
78 X_ Phase II Amendments to tlic King County 2012 - Countywide Ptanning
79 Policies are ainended as shown by Attacliment A to Ordinaiice 16335.
so . Y. Pliase [I Amendments to the King Couuty 2012 - Countywide Planning • ~
i
81 Policies are antended as shown by Attac]iment A to Ordinance 16336.
'
82 Z. Pliase ]I Amendments to the King Countv 2012 - Countvwide Plannino
83 Policies are amended, as siiokm bv flttachmenis A znd B to this ordinanee ;
84 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are '
85 each hereby amende:l to read as follows: 85 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
87 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of tlie population of tmincorporated King Coimiy.
4
. . Ordinance 16747 88 13. 'fhe amcndments to the CountyWide Planning Policies adoptect bk• Ordinaiice
89 10840 are hereby ratitied on bchalFofthe popidation of unincorpar.lted f:ing County.
90 C. 'Fhe amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adoptecl by Orclinance
91 11061 are hzreb} ralilied on behalfoPthe population of uuincorporated Kiug Cumnty.
92 D. The Phase I[ amendmeuts to the King County 2012 Countywide Planuiug
93 Policies adopted by Ordinance ( 1=146 are hereby ratifieci un behalf of the population of
94 unincorporated King County.
95 E. The amenchnents to the King County 2012 - Couniqwide Planning Policies, as
96 shown byAttachment I to Ordinance 12027 ace hereby ratified on behalf of the
97 population of unincorporated King County. ~
98 F. Tlie amendmen[s to the King County 2012 - Counqnvide Planning Policies; as
99 sliown by Attachn}ent 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of tlie i
100 population ofunincorpm'ated King County. ~
101 G. The amend¢ients to titie King County 2012 - Cowitywide Plaiiiiing Policies, as ~
I
102 sliown by Attachments l and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of Nie
. 103 population of unincorporated King Counly. . . .
i
104 H. The amendiiieiits to the Kina, Cowity 2012 - Comltywide Planniiig Policies, as ~
105 shown by Attachntent 1 through 4 to Ordinance 134I5, are hereby ratified on Uehalf of i
!
106 the population of unincorporated King County. ;
107 I. The amendments to the Kiug County 2012 - Coimtywide Planning Policies, as
108 shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereUy ratified on behalf of
109 thc population of wiincorporated King County. i
5
Ordinance 16747
110 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countv+vide Plaiining Policies, as
111 shown bp Attacliment I to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratitied on bzhalf of the 112 populatios of imincorporated Kinb Coun[y.
113 K. 'Che amendntents to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, ns
lln showii by Attaclunent i to Ordinance t4391, ace hereby rntitied on Uehalf ol tfie
115 poputation of unincorporated King County.
116 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 -.C:ounty%vide Plannimg Policies, is
117 shown by Attaclunent 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf oFthe
118 population of mtincoiporate<l King County.
119 M. The nmciidinents to die King Comi[y 2012 - Count}•wicie Plannina Poticies, as
120 SIlOxl71 by Attaclunent t to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
iu populationofunincorporatedKingCounty.
i
122 N. The amendments to Uie ICing County 2012 - Countyw-ide Planning Policies, as ~
i
123 shown Uy At[acf}ments t tlirouah 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf oC ;
124 the popu(ation of uuiucorporated King County.
125 • O. Tlie amendments'to the [<ing Comity 2012 - Countywide Plvining Policies, as '
126 shown by Attacliment t to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on belaalf of the ~
127 poputation of Lmincorporated King County. I
128 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as i
129 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on bchalf of the. ;
130 population of unincorporated King County.
6
Ordinance 16747
131 Q. -Clie amendmeuts to tfte King Cuttnt}' 2012 - Coun[) wide Plantiing Policie,, as
132 shuwn bp Atlachments I ancl 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratitied on behalf of the
133 population oF unincorporated King Counly.
134 R. Tliz amencimen[s [o the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policizs, as
135 shown by attachment E\ to Ordiuance 143,14, are hereby ratitiect on behalf of the
136 population of wiincoiporated King Countv.
137 S. The amendments to the Kitig County 2012 - Countywide Plamtino Policies, as
138 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15 121, are liereby ratitied on behalFol
139 the population of unincorporated King Couuty.
140 T. l'he amen¢ments to tlte King Cowity 2012 - Comitywide Plamiing Policic,, as
141 sltoNvn by Attachment t\ to Ordiiiance (5122, are hereby ra[itied on behalfufthe
142 population of unincoiporated King Cowity.
143 U. The amendmeiits to Ihe King County 2012 - Countywide Planniilg Policies, as
144 shown bp Attacltntent A[o Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratifiec( on beha(f of the
145 population of unincorporated King County.
146 V. The aipendments to tlie King County 2012 - Cowitywide Ylanning Policies, as ,
147 shown by Attaclmieuts A and B to Ordinance 15426, arc hereby ratified on behalf of Uie
148 population of imincoiporated King County.
149 W. The amendments to Hie King Cowity 2012 - Couutywide Planning Policies,
150 as shoivn by Attaclunents A, B, and C to Ordinauce 15709, are hereby ratified on behalf
i
151 of the population of uuincorporated King County. ~
~
i
7 .
,I
Ordinance 76747
152 X. "Ctic antzndn2znts lo tlte King County 2012 - County~vide Planning Policies, as
153 sho«n b}• :\ttachment r\ to Ordinance 16056 .ire herzby ratified oii behalf oF the
154 population of unincorporltecl King County.
155 Y. "The autendments to the King Coun[y 2012 - Couilt}'Wide Planniu& Policies; as
156 shown by t\ttachments A, B, C, ll, E, F and G to Ordinance 16 15 l, are herzby ratified oii
157 behalfoFtlie population.oPimincorporated King Comity. ~
158 Z. 'rhe amendnteuts to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planaing Policies. as I
159 shown by Attachment A to Orctinance I G334, and Ihose ilems nutubered I through 11, I;
i
160 attd 15, as sliown in At[aclimeut B to Ordinaiicz 16334; 1re hereliy ratitied oii behall'of
I
161 tlie population of unincorporated King Coun[y. Those items iiumbered 12 aiid 14, showm i
162 as struck-thini.igh oii Attachment B ro Ordinance 16;34, are nol rltifiecl.
163 At\. The ameudnlents to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Polices,
164 as shown by Attachment to Ordinance 16335 2re hereby ratified oii behalf of the
~
165 population of unincorporated King County.
166 BB. The a❑tendnient to Uie King County 2012 - Countywide Plannin; Policics.
167 as shown by Attachment A of Ordinance 16336, is hereby ralified oii behalf of'the '
158 population ofunincoiporated King Couuty. Additionall}, by Ordinance 16336, au
I
i
169 amendment to the Interim Potential Anncxation Are1 n-tap to include any additional ~
170 unincorporated wban land created by the Urban Growth Area (UGA) amendment in Ihe I
171 Poten[ial Annexation Area of the city of Black Diamond is hereby ratified on behalf of
172 the population of unincorpoi•ated King County.
;
8
i
Ordinance 16747
173 CC. 'Che amendmeuts to Uie KinR Coimty 2012 - Coun[v« ide PI•uuiino Policies
174 as sho~cn bti Attachments A nnd B to this ordinance are hereb y rltitiecl on behalFof the
175 po ulation of unincoroorated Kind Count~
Ordinance 16747 Was introduced on l f/23/2009 and passed by the Mehopufitan King
County Council on I/2512010, by tlie Foltowiug votc:
Yes: S- Iv(s. Dragq \4c Plii(lips, NIr. von Reiclibauer, iMs. I-lague,
NQs. Patterson, Vis. Lambert, PVIr. Ferguson and n%(r. Dunn
No: 0
6xcused: I - \dr. Gossett
KING CODU'fY COUNCIL
. KING COWi TY, U'ASFIINGI'ON
'A, ~
_Y v •
N
Roben V. Ferguson, Cha -r
ATTEST:
r*y fT ~
~ ~
• -v i
, Anne Noris, Clerk ofthe Council (D i r=; i
c c- ~
. ' . z C:) L~ I
c~
= cn li
APPROVEDIhis dayof_F[,bytA4VV-, aO~Q 'i
- -i
~ • !
. Dow Conslantine, County Gxecutive
i
AUachments: A. Motion 09-1, B. Motion09-2 ~
9
y67ki.~ ~ 2009A641 Atlachmenf A
J~
10/2S/09
~
Sponsored Qy: Executive Committec i
~
/tlJpr
l
2
3
4 110TION NO. 09-1
5 A MOT[ON to adop[ a work plan and scliedule [o address die
6 policy framework for atlocation of regional services and facilities.
7 I
3 WHEREAS, the Growllt Management Planning Council has'directed stafF[o develop ~
9 recommendations for a major update oFthe Countywide Plaiming Policies in 2010 to bring ~
10 those policies into cansistency witli Vision 2040. j
II i
- 12 W[-IF,REAS, the Growth Management Planning Council has deve(oped proposed growth '
13 targets for housing and empfoyment, that implement the Regiona( Growth Strategy '
14 contained in Vision 2040 while providing 20-year targets for cities to use in the next round '
15 of GMA comprehensive plan updates:
16
17 WHEREAS, since the Countywide Plamiing Policies were first adopted in 1992,
18 significant amounts of grovrth liave occuaed inside the urban growth area, within cities and
19 wiincorporated King County, and particulazly inside cities with designated urban centecs, ! i
20 iyhere pending growth targets would dircct even greater amounts of growth .
21
i
22 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THC GROWTFI MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF I
23 KRVG COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: ~
i i
24 25 Direc[ staff to pursue a work plan for phase I of an update of the Countywide Plaiming
26 Policics. ~
i ,
27
28 Goal of Work Program: I
29 The GMPC will update the Countywide Plaiming Policies to ensure consistency with the
:
30 bfulti-County Platming Policies contained within Vision 2040, to ensure consistency with ! i
31 the State Growth Mvtagentent Acf, to reflect cun'ent terminology and relevant references,
32 and to establish the poliey framework for advancing the Regional Growth Stcategy tluough '
33' prioritized allocation of regional services and facilities. Phase One of the work plan is
34 focused on cstablishing one or more Framework policies that will advance the Regional ~ I
35 Growth Strategy through prioritized allocation of regional services and facilities; while
36 continuii;g to serve all communities in King County
37 i
38 i
39 I
I
i
2009-0691 AllachmentA '
40 COIlICXI: 41 With the adoption of the new gcowth targets, King County is facing vi increased amount of
42 growth countywide and a pattern of growYh tliat concentrates housing and employment in
43 cities with Urban Centers. Communities throughouG the counry recognize that tlieir abi(ity
44 to accommodate groNvth depends on adequate provision of services and Facilities. Further,
45 a number oFcities are concemed that the existing provision of services and facilities are
46 inadequate ro meet cuaent needs. The first priority in dzveloping the work program will
47 be to define the regional services and facilities that are necessary to suppoR growth.
48
49 Direct staff to develop options for new CPP policy language that will prioritize regionat
50 service delivery in ways that promote the regional growth sUategy. fn dcveloping that
51 po(icy, staFf should address Ihese issues according to the schedule sliown bclow:
52 • Define what constitutes the °regional services" affected by diis policy;
53 •(dentify the existing policy Uasis for delivering regional services;
54 • Drafr new policy options that address regional service delivery for GMPC
55 consideration by the end of the first quarter of 2010.
;
56
57 Schedule for further work on ro osed olic o tions: I
'
I
Task ;42
Define regional services and facilities ihat are tiec( to growth 09 ~
i
Identify existing policy basis for future delivery of services ~vi09
facilities
Draft policy options for guidance on delivering regional servic2010. i
and facilities
i
~
i i
Present policy options to UMPC for first reading and discussioQtr, Revise policy options as directed by GMPC , 2
010
Approval of policy amendmeut(s) and direction of next steps b, 20 (0
GMPC '
i
58 Adopted by the Growth Management Planning Councif of King Cowity on October 28, '
59 2009 in open session, and signed by the chair of ihe GMPC. , j
60 j
61
62 '
63 Kurt Triplett, Chair, rowUi Management Plarming Couucil ~
i
i
64 I
i
1 .6 ~ d.a. ~ 2009-0641 Altachmenl0
~ A
I 0/23/09
Sponsored IIy: Executive Committee ~
/Pr i
I
1 MOTIOiV tVO. 09-2 I
2 A MOTION by the Growth N[anagement P(anning Council of King
3 Cowity recommending flte antendmen[ of the Cotmtywide Planning
4 Policies updating existing policies to provide for housing and
S employment targets for the period 2006-2031. This motion also
6 amends Table LU-L of the Countywide Plaruiing Policies by replacing
7 the existing Iiouseho(d and F.mployment Growch Targets for the
S 2001-2022 period with new Housing 1nd Employmen[ Growth i
9 Targets for tlte 2006-203 l period.
l0
(1
12
13 WHEREAS, in accordarice with the Growth Managemcnt Act (GMA), the 2002 ±
14 CountyNvide Planning Policies established household and employmeut targets for each city
15 azid for King County through 2022; and 16
17 WHEREAS, Ihe 2002 targets need to be updated [o reflect projected growth through 2031 ~
18 in accordance with the GMA (RC W 36 70A (10); and i
19
20 WEIEREAS, Countywide.Planniqg Policy FW-3 states that the adopled household and .
21 empfoyment tugets shalt be monitored by Kittg County annually witli adjusUnents made by ,
22 Uie Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-(, Step
23 6;and
" 24 ,
25 WHEREAS since June, 2008 staff from King County and the cities in King County have
26 worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year housing and employment ;
27 targets; and ~
28 !
29 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the updates of
30 the housing and employmcnt growth targcts for the period 2006-2031, wilh opportunity for '
31 public comment on April 15, 2009, July 15, 2009 and September 16, 2009.
32 ~
i
~
I.
i
~
;
,
i
~
. 2009-064 1 Atlachmznl ❑
I
33 f3E IT RESOLVED THAT TF[E GROWTH MANAGEN[ENT PLANN[NG COUNC[L OF '
34 KING COUNTY HEREBY NIOVBS TO AMEND THE POL[C[ES, T6XT, AND'CABLE j
35 LU-l OF "fHE COUNTYWIDE PLANLNING POL[C[ES AS FOLLO WS: i
36 C. Urban Areas ~
i
37 The jollowing polrcies estabfish nn UrGan Grotivih rtren (UGA), detei•mine I/re amount oj ~
38 lreusekelAhousine and employment gi•oivdi fo be accommodnted ivithin the UGA in !/re ~
39 jorm ojtargets jar each jtirisdretra7, nnd iden(ify niethods !o phase developmerit ividrin this ~
40 area in order to bring cerminty to long-(ei•i+i planning and developuient tivifhin the County. !
41 A!l cilres are lnchu/ed in the UCA, tvilh the crries in t{re Ruraf Aren identified as islands oj '
42 urbnn grotivlh. The UGA is a pernranent designnrion. Laiid outside Nie UGA rs designarecl
43 jor per•manent r:rral mrd resoitrce «ses. Cmintyivide Policies otr Xrrrat and Resource Arens
44 are found itt Chapler IIIA, Resmrrce Lnrtrls, curd Chnpter IIIB, Rimn! Ai•eas. !
45 I
46
47 In accordance iv![h the Stnfe Growrh Manageinent Act (GM,,I) (RCW 36.70A.! 10), Bre State ~
48 Office of Fiirnncial Managentenl(OFAD prnvides n population projectron to each county. I
49 The counry, through n collaborarive intergovernmental process estab(islred by lhe Growth I
50 Marngentent Plntrrrrng Councrl, a!locates the poptdation as groivfh Inrgets to individtta! ~
51 jurrsdretions. Forecusts prepared Gy the P:rget Soumd Regionnl Cotnrcil are :ised Io
52 eslablish !he cototty emp(oymenl plrojecfion.
53
54 The process for nllocn(ing rowtlt largets in Kiiag Coerriry is u collnfiorofive exercise
55 iityo(vinjz iitptU li'on: the coturtv nnd ci(ies The allocations deiernrilred throu41: lJiis orocess
56 are to be Quided by exisling relevmN Dolicies at the regional, cotattvtvide. ntJd local levels ~
57 mid are to take iitto accomit best trvai(able daln on 1'actars rnfl:rencrng ftrture 2rowth in !he I
58 re¢ion, crs fellejNS: ~
59 ~
60 1. :rr,,. Prrp'eYN+er'Jo+eensts'a, ~,.•,.a ~ n.° ~en'-$es$+`F+131~+e-$+eberxec+s-of-tHe ~
61 , ggiiih-, East, eine-suGRrea ~
~
62 eny3Feynrent-rargets- I
• 63 • 2. f~e~te(atierrryrejec-~eetrtedF~~jeu~
64 , iallattietarFeJ ~
65 pe~xlaFte ttrtit~t::°~°;RRrn,°cF ' '
66 3. ~Fre-teeJrrrieaf-sfetfffraas{afe"he-pVmW(e"rojestierr~irrts-~r'olee%"a~.-:=~ I
67 telriKg-irrtaae . I j
68 ~xejeefrorrs-therr-Leeenre-s .
69 4. .
70 emnlcyvx 'ia based ei ' g-Rolieies. I I
7( i j
72 The housing and emkloyuienf capaeity rn the UGd, based on adopted plans and regidn(ions, ~ I
73 slmuld accaiunodale dte projected 20-year growt{e Grotivdr is to be uccamnodated ivithrn j i
74 pervnaneiit Urban Areas 6y fncreasing densities, as needed P)rasitig shordd ocair tivil{ritr i
75 the UGA, as neeessary, to ensure that services are provrded as gr.owth occurs.
76
I
~
I
20090641AItachmentB 77 FW-I ( The !and use paitcm for King County shall protect the natural environment by
78 reducing the coasiunptioit of land aiid concentra[ing deve(opment. An Urban
79 Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource (ands shall be designated and the
80 necessary implementing regu(ations adoptcd. This includes Cotmtywide estab-
81 lishment of a bouttdary for the Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall
SZ make land use decisions based on Ihe Countywide Plaruiiug Policies.
83
84 PW-12 The Urbait Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate future urban
35 development. Policics to pliase the provision of urban services and to eusure
86 eFficient usc of the growtti capacity within the Urban Growth Area shal( be
87 instituted.
88
89 FW-l2(a) All jurisdictions within King Coimty shnre the responsibility -t~o`_t[a-ccommodate the ~
90 20-year populalion projection and jeb empfovment forecast. Y~p6Pulnkieft ~
~
91 prejesFie~nss+g+zed-Eo t43e-€etn-sMbarea o-°,, East-
92 e••, r.:^dERHf& FF![)(pyft7pRE 93 grewEk- Anticipated growth shali be atlocated pursuant to Uie foUowing
94 objectives:
95 a. To plan for a oattern of ¢rowth that is euided bv the Itegional Growth
96 Strateev contained in Vision 2040 the ¢rowth manaeement transpoetation
97 ?nd economic develooment plan for the 4-countv ccntral Puee[ Sound reeion;
98 b.. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directing growth to Urban
99 Centers and Activi[y Centers;
100 c. To limii deve(opment in the Rural Areas; ,
101 d. To protec[ designated resource lands;
l02 e. To ensure efficient use of infrastrucwre;
103 F. To improve the jobs/housing balance within the countv en~rsuljatea-bnsis; 104 g. To promote a(and use pattem that can be served by public transportation and
105 other altematives to the sing(e occupancy vehicle; and
106 h. To provide sufficicnt opportunities for gcowth within the jurisdictions.
l07
108 FW-12(b) The grovrth targets established pursuant to the methodology described in LU'-25e i
109 and LU-25d shall be supported by botli.regiona! and local tratvsportation i
110 investments. The availability of an adequate transportation systent is critically ~
I l 1. important to accommodating growth. Tlie regional responsibility shali be met by I
112 p(anning for and delivering county, state, and federal investments that suppoct the
. 113 growth tazgets and the land use pattem of the County. 7'his includes investments
114 in transit, state highways in key regional transportation corridors, and in improved
115 access to the designated Urbati Centers. The local responsibility shall be met by
116 locaf transportation system investmenis diat support the nchievement of tlie
117 tazgets.
~ 118 FW-12(c) Ensuring suCficient water supply is essential to accommoda(e growth and ~
119 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water ~
120 supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply j
121 planning efforts in the Region mus[ be ongoiiig. i
122
i
; i
i
,
;
,
2009-0641 AUachrnent B :
123
124 UrGun Growlh A r e a
125 The Croiv(h Managemenf Ac( requires Krtig County m rlesignnle ntr Urban Groivth Area ~
126 in cons:rllntiai winc ci(ier. The Couutywide Planning Policies nmsl estnblish un Ut•ban
127 Crowlh Aren thnt contains enough ur.bnn land ro accommorlnte ut least 20 years ofneiv ~
128 popidatiori und emp(oynrent grow!!i. The Groivth Mnnageinent dct sfafes: "based upon
129 Ure populntiai ja•ecnst made jor the County Gy ihe Office ojFir7nncia! ,Vanagemen(, the
130 UrGan Groti+,th Areas in die County shnll inck«/e nreds ajed densities silfficient to pennrr ~
13l urban groivth tha( rs projected ro occm• in die Cowtry for ihe succeedrtrg 20-yenr perrad.
132 Each Urbnte Crowth Aren shall perini! urbnn densiries and.shall rnclude greenbelt and 133 open spnce nreus. " Ati (JrGan Crowlh Area inap rs attncherl as Appendrx which grrides
134 fhe adapfiaj of the 1994 kfelropo(itan King County Compreheiisive Plnn. ,
'
135
136 LU - 25a Eachjurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate Ihe Itoasehold housine and
137 employment targels estabtished pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. This obligation j
138 includes: i
139 a. Ensuring adequate zoning caplcity; and ~
140 b. Planning for and defivering water, sewer, transportation and other
141 infrastructure, in concert with Cederal and state investments and recognizing ~
142 where applicabfe special purpose districts; and
143 c. Accomntodating.increases in Heuselteld Iiousine and employment targets ac
144 annexations occur. '
145
146 'Che targets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within each ~
147 jurisdiction. The tugets cio not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee that a given
148 number of housing units witl be built orjobs added during the planning period. j i
- 149 i
150 LU-256 Growth tarects For cacli Potential Aruiexation Area shall be set as a proportional i
151 share of the overall Urban Unincomorated Area tareet commensurate with the '
152 PAA's share of totat Unincoroorated Urban Area housine and emntovment ~
153 capacitv determined in the most recent Buitdable Lands ReoortAs annexations ,
154 or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. #euselielt# Housin¢
155 and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potentia( annexation area, as
156 adopted in Tabfe LU-l, shall be transFerred to the azutexing jurisdiction or newly
157 incorporated ciry as follows:
158 i ;
159 a. King County and the respeCtivc city will detertnine new housine keeselaeld
160 and employment tnrgets for areas under consideration for annexation prior to '
161 . the submittal of the anttexation proposal ro the King County Boundary
162 . Review Board;
163 b. A city's IjeeseHel4 housine and employment targets shall be increased by a
164 shaze of the tazget for Ihe potential annexation area proporlionate to the share ~
165 of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the ~
166 area annexed. In the case of incorporation, an equivalent formula shali be
167 used to establish heu :eheld housine and employment targets for the. new city. ~
i
~
i i
I
2009-084I AUachmant B 168 Bach city will dctermine how and where within their corporate boundaries to
169 accommodate tacget incrcases;
170 c. The County's tmincomorated Urban areas targets shall be correspondingly
171 decreased to ensure that overall target Ievels in the coimty remain the same;
172 d. Thelieaselaek} housin and emptoyment targets in Table LU-i will be ~
177 updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations or incorporations.
174 These target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Nlanagement
~ 175 Planniiig CounciL
(76 .
177 LU -25c The target objectives identified in FW-12a shafl be realized tlirough the following ~
178 methodology for allocating housin~lieeselield targets: ~
179 180 a. Determine the ad(litional population that must be accommodated countywide
♦t..,d'FF..,..n....,fWB kI-Q
181. by calrul6 ltflg~
Ohe-maqt Fepent C dt;t....o I
182 ' . c~tm.,~„~c nCvvrc"'~.v~vF :-~~'nGllGfftl-iVIE1NAg8R?@F2I-p8••••c.i8iioii-pFJC6E10: C•••~rcvr~~'~no-cncr""~vc I
183 durin¢ the twenty year pfanning period based on dte range of pooulatio» i
184 nroiections made bv the State Office ofFinancial Mauaeement for the countv i
185 and 4-countvi central Pueet Sound re¢ion and euided bv the Reeional Gcowth ~
186 Strateev contained in Vision 2040; i
187 b. SubteaeE-aTe:..., :•4,.b.. .;;u:: a
..;b:,. to :e~
.roeu~E-e€graa~•E(~ ~
188 h ' a ~r-}n-fkie-unineer~erated-Patrel-,hrea; i
189 b. Assigtt proportions of the ufHne countnvidepopufation growtli to each of six ~
190 Reeional Geograpliies as dafined bv Vision 2040 to include Metropo(itaii ~
191 Cities; Core Cities. Laceer Cities Small Cities Unincoroorated Urbazi
192 Crowlh Areas, and Rurai and Naturat Resource Lands Nie £ear--sebffeas-fSea-
193 ch,..., c,,,,.h c..,.t d Qu...,i r:t:e,.) ~..,..a .w., ...,...,.t#+ort-of-€tEktEe ~
194 et~leYtcte~tEgtewtli ..-..Cseeeasied-€er-eaelrefthese-sabatea ,-by~kke Pag2fSet+nd
195 Regiena{-6eyesi};
196 c. Allocate oopulation erowth to eactt Reeiona( Georaphy as guided bv Vision ~
197 2040 and also taking into account additional factors i
198 d. Assume that a small amount of nopulation RrowUi approximatelv 3% to 4%
199 of the countywide total, will occur in the RuraCazea7 ; i
200 e. Conved the _sE:m.n.~„~^~ projected populatibn for each sadareaUrban Reeional ~ I
201 Geoeraohy to,an cstimated number oflieaseHelds housine units needed. ~
202 using projec[ed average household sizes, rouo quarters population and
203 vacancvrates ' Fefleet ti ' n-aexexg-Hiose,t+t~cre;s ~~-•°~-a~,o '
~
204 ,;,a; -..,.,..,~-.eFt,a; +
205 f. A(locate a keeselield housine target to individua(jurisdictions, within each I
206 sNl3area Regiona( Geograohv, based on FW-12a and considering the
207 following factors: i
208 1. the availability ofwater and tlie capacity of the sewer system; j
209 2. the remaiiung portions of previously adopted houselto(d targets; !
210 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each jurisdiction; i
211 4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each jurisdiction; and ~
212 5. the apparent mazket trends for hoitsing in the area. i
213 f. Jurisdictions sliall plan for hoi_ ~sine heaseheld tazgets as.adopted in Table LU- ~
214 1; and i
- , 2009A641 At[achment B
215 g. Monitoring should £ollow the process described in policy FW- l.
216
217
i 218 A portion ojlhe urbnn employment groivth wi!l accur rn Acfivity Areas and nerghborhood,s 219 in the UrGnn Aretr. "lhis employinenf grow(h wiR sttppor( !he Urbait Cen/ers, ivhile
220 balnncrng locul employment opporYunities in the Urbnn flren
221
222 LU - 25d The target objectives identified in FW-l2a sha(I be realizcd through ttie following
223 methodology for allocating emp(oyment targets:
224
225 a. Determine the nwnber of jobs diat must be accommodated in-ea^4h„-ow ~
226 suyer.,a ov•n° ..n„ ic a~. 4 etl3 t, o i~•
227 „ J c ~asF,
..&es:aa ft2e-wtNa-tHe-etBSF-reseni-gSPC-jeb-esfima~-' ~ ,s-~,~„-durine
ZZg ttte 20-year p(anning period based on the most recent forecast of emplovment
229 growth produced bv the Puaet Sound Reeional Council for the fourwunty
230 central Pueet Sound reeion nnd ¢uidcd bv the Regional Growth Stratee
231 contaiaed in Vision 2040. 'nty-in-Ehe eFury}aytnent
232 feneas, Ih..~of-n a-eash 233 stidarea. [-Sel ish~te; ih R
234 eiiker-side-af ihe~FSF!'« o«~.,,E-
235 b. Assien nrooortions of the countvwide emplovment arowth to eaclt o£six !
236 Regional Geoerauhies as defined bv Vision 2040 to include Metropolitan
j
237 Cities, Core Cities. Lazeer Cities Small Cities Unincorporated Urban Growth ~
238 Areas and Ruraland Natural Resource Lands i
239 c. A(locate emulovment erowUi to each Re ional Gcograpliv as gu[ded bv
240 Vision 2040 aitd also takinv into accoimt additional factors; i
241 d. Assume that a smalt amoimt of emolovment nrowth less than of the
242 countvwide total, will occur iu die Rural area- I~
243 e. Allocate an emplovment tar et ro individual iurisdictions within each Urban ~
244 Regional Geocrauhv, based on FW-12a and cousiderin the foflowine factors7
245 b-.-For-ea :,,..t..:~~,-n.,,-..~.~..
e-eaege-11fiefl -wtxsk
246
' 1tifisd'teEiaes
w~tliifi-ilieeaigeree-wt46~a.s~ElieiftargeES-attc~a!(esate.
247
~Fo3~nenF$i'owNrE~'~tgeEs-Ee''r~f~i~i~ua~ jerisc~icEieas~3asedaFrsoHSi~eret'tett I!
248
249 j
250 1, the PSRC small area forecasis;
251 2. the presence of urban centers, manufacturing/industrial centers, and . ~
252 activity areas within eucltjurisdiction; j
253 3, the availability of zoned cmnenercial and industiial development capacity
254 in each jurisdiction and;
255 4. the access to transit, as well as to existing ]iighways and arterials. i.
256 .
257 c. Jurisdictions shali plan for employment largets as adopted in Table LU-l. ~
258 ;
i
2009-0641 Altachmenl6 '
260
- z(Z fte9bnalGtu9raPhY Fbus1M PRA Mous"nG hTloYment FAA f+NbYmerR '
264 ocyls~wre, nr"c nrxe n,yea, nryac ;
266 tktr+zHUne IktNkwlH15 IkCtkwbbs Fkllkw]a0t
MetropoRan Wks 268 &Ikwe I7.000 290 ' 53.000
270 5<atU< 86,000 I46,700 ~
SuMotal 103,000 199,100 ~
fqro Qtks
AWurn 9,620 19350 BoLhell ' 3,000 9l0 1.800 ' 300
9alen ' 31900 4.600 I
Fe0eral Way 8.100 1,790 17300 Tl0
Kent 7.&l0 t.560 I7 200 790 plFlaN 7,200 1,370 20.200 650 Nednond ' tO.NJ 640 17,000 MROn " 14.875 3,895 79,000 470
SeaTac 5,800 25700 Tvbvlla 4,800 50 15,500 7050 ~
. Subtotnl 75,255 167,250
laryei tl[ka ~
DL'S MdnCS 7,Op0 5,000 I
[SSaquah 5,750 290 20.000 ~
Kemwre l.Nq 7.000 I
4kdeVaileY' 1.800 1.060 y000
Mxrttr[slanC 2,000 1,000 '
SammamRh 9000 350 1,800 ' . .
Stror¢Ilre - 5000 5,000 i
woodrtAle 3,000 5,000 . ~
SuMotal 18,050 4;L00 ;
SmI Gtus
AI N 190 210
. i
&auaARS 3 3 ~
Pla(k0iamorld 1,500 1.050 - . I
Camatlon 370 370 ~
KA 10
Codiyton 1,470 1.720 ~
- Pnat 1,190 840 ~
Enmclaw 1625 AS
MrufWnt ' t
izkeFcrestVark 475 210
- !
Mcbre 19 ~
MYten 50 90 160 I
Nkwostlc ' 1,200 ]JS
Wamand/Park IJO 65 ~
fbnh B:rM 665 1,050 ~
Po6fic 785 135 370
.
5 sh 10
- 5 ua'mlc 1615 I,USO . , Yarra.vPoin[ ]q i
Subtohl 10,933 0,168. IHUn lhiKOrpaaftd - •
PotentialMnemtlanAreas 12930 7,950
Wth NghNie 1,360 570 ~
_ &arGeekl.PD 910 7,580 ;
INida4nedlhbanUYnmrpaated 650 90 '
suaotat 15,850 ia,tso
CotiM UG47oh1 237077 428,068 ~
~ 7ar~e~ base year K 3006.'VM / (Abrptts hawbeen adJuned fn reHeR ame)atlatt Wwgh NOe. _ I
•"Tar tlorM 'eVaCe PMCOntl ntona ovalMtl -mWyjdntplanfmSUnmitNace. ~
I
i.
J
2009-0641 Altachmenl B
27 ( ADOPTED by the GroNvth 'Lvtanagcmcnt Planning Cvuncil of King County on October 28, ~
272 2009 in open session, and signed by the chair of the GMPC. '
277 i
274 ~ - I
275 ,
276 Kurt Triplett, Chair, Growt fanagement Planning Council ~
277 i
~
i
~
~
I
i i
i
~
~
~
~
I i
~
~
'
~ i
i
j ~
~ I
I ,
;
~
I ;
,
i
~
,
'
I