HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM IV-ACITY OF
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
* WASHINGTON
Agenda Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 4633, authorizing a grant Date: August 6, 2010
agreement between the City and the King Conservation District for the Fenster Levee Setback, Phase II pro~ect.
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Planning and Development Attachment 1: Resolution No. 4633 No match required. City
with Exhibit A -Grant Agreement, received $304,103 from the
Fenster Levee Setback &Floodplain Salmon Recovery Funding
Restoration II Board and approved $35,000 in Storm Funds for the
pro~ect.
Administrative Recommendation: Recommend adoption of Resolution No. 4633 authorizing execution
of grant agreement with the King Conservation District and acceptance of grant funds for the design,
permitting, and construction of the second phase of the Fenster Levee Setback project.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn and Water Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9) first identified the Fenster Levee
setback project on the Green River in Auburn as a priority salmon habitat project when developing the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan in 2000. The City of Auburn applied for and received
Salmon Recovery
Funding funds through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office to complete Phase
I of the Fenster Levee setback project in 2006. The City of Auburn completed Phase I of the project in
2008 which involved approximately 700 feet of levee improvement, the placement of large woody
debris and rock armoring, and the planting of native riparian trees and shrubs. The City of Auburn
applied for King Conservation District grant funds in 2010 in order to complete Phase II of the Fenster
Levee setback project which will setback an additional segment of levee immediately adjacent to the north of the first phase of the project near River Mile 32 on the Green River. Project
components
include approximately 880 feet of levee setback, re-attachment of a large forested swale to the river
for off-channel habitat and fish refuge, increased area for floodwater quieting and storage, removal of
invasive plans, native plant revegetation, and the installation of large woody debris at the toe of the
new levee. This project will allow for greater movement of the Green River during the winter high flow
period and increased flood storage, providing both greater protection of downstream property, and
also refugia for threatened salmon and steelhead on the Green River. The site for this phase of the project is adjacent to the downstream end of an intact two-mile long riparian corridor
along the Green
River within the Fenster Nature Park (Auburn) and the Auburn Narrows Natural Area (King County).
The City's Fenster Levee Setback &Floodplain Restoration II project was approved for the full
funding request of $200,000 by the King Conservation District on July 12, 2010. A grant agreement
from the King Conservation District was received by the City on July 27, 2010. The grant does not
have a formal match requirement. The City previously received a $304,103 Salmon Recovery
Funding Board grant (approved by City Council on April 5, 2010) and authorized $35,000 in City
Storm Funds for the project. The King Conservation District grant will fulfill the fifteen percent
matching requirement on the Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant.
k t + •1~
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑ Building ❑ M&0
❑ Airport ❑ Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor ❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Serv. ❑ Finance ❑ Parks
❑ Human Services ®Planning & CD ❑ Fire ®Planning
❑ Park Board ❑Public Works ®Legal ❑ Police ❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other ❑Public Works ❑ Human Resources
❑ Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: ®Yes ❑No Council Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing _I_I
Referred to Until I l
Tabled Until I I
Councilmember: Wa ner Staff: Shih
Meeting Date: August 16, 2010 Item Number:
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION N0. 4-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A GRANT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE KING
CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR THE FENSTER
LEVEE SETBACK & FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION,
PHASE II PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Fenster Levee Setback is a project identified in the
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource
Inventory Area 9, Salmon Habitat Plan, Making our Watershed Fit for a King,
dated August 2005 and ratified by the City Council of the City of Auburn ("City")
by adoption of Resolution No. 3922 on October 17, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the City and King County Water and Land Resources
Division (WLRD) entered into an interlocal agreement for the performance of
work for the Phase I of the Fenster Levee Setback project as authorized by the
Auburn City Council by adoption of Resolution No. 4054 on July 17, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the City and King County WLRD have completed the
construction of setback levee improvements and habitat restoration as part of
Phase I of the Fenster Levee Setback project; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution No.
4415 authorizing the City's acceptance of a $130,000 grant from the King
Conservation District for the acquisition of the Smith Property which was identified
Resolution No. 4633 August 2, 2010
Page 1
as a critical segment of the Fenster Levee Setback project, and did subsequently
purchase the property, thereby completing City ownership of the proposed project
site; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2010 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4584
authorizing the City's acceptance of a $304,103 grant from the Salmon Recovery
Funding Board for the Fenster Levee Setback, Phase II Project; and
WHEREAS, the King Conservation District is a local agency responsible for
the administration of WRIA Forum Grants for salmon recovery projects; and
WHEREAS, the City has been awarded a King Conservation District grant in
the amount of $200,000 for the design, permitting, and construction of the Fenster
Levee Setback, Phase II Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Grant Agreement
between the City and King Conservation District in the total amount of $200,000, or
such amount as may be awarded to the City under the Grant Agreement, in
substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A"
and incorporated herein by this reference.
Resolution No. 4633 August 2, 2010
Page 2
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day of , 2010.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
Resolution No. 4633 August 2, 2010
Page 3
r
EXHIBIT A
green-u~~~al~~~h-~ ate~s~ed ~'orux~a ~X~ 9}
City of~~urn
This ~g~•eeme~~t is made ~eteen tho ding anse~•vat~on district Number 9, a municipal
co~{pOrt~on in xng bounty, ash~nto~a, ~oca~ed at ~ ~ 07 Lady day, quite ~ 30, ~ento~.,
TA~ 98~~ ~~•efe~~rd to herein as "District"~~ and the pity of Auburn, a municipal corporation in
ding bounty, a~~~ington, located at ~S eat I1~ai~~ t~"eet, Aubu~~~, 980 i ~ ~~•efe~•z•ed to
~~erein as "Recipient"~, ~'o~• the purpae set fo~~th herein,
~ , ~ herea.~, the Dit~"ict i~ a special put~~ae dist~iiet o~"ani~ed aid e~i~ing ~~nde~"
authority of h~pter 89,08 ~ ~~ioh engages certain aet~vit~es and pzo~z~m.s to eonser~c
natu~"a~ ~•esau~"ces, lncludln~ gall ar~~ ~vate~~, ~~lch actl~~tles a~~e decia~•ed to be of special bene~'it
to lands; and
~ Whereas, ~~x~"~~~nt t~ ~C' 8,08.400, ~.it~ ~u~ty h.a auti~o~+ize t~~ itnpoed.
~ system. o~ as~essn~e~~ts to finance tl~e activities and progran7~ of the Dist"ict; and
l , l~e~"eas, puz•suant to RCS 89, 08,~~0, R 89.08, ~ 4 ~ az~dla~" c~l~apt~zi 9, 4
the D~st~`tc~ a~~thot`I~ed to ~~1t~r into agl"ce~nent ~~tl~ n1UI1~C1~~ entltle~ and agencies
~gavernnlental or othe~~~vise}, o~, thelr des~~~ees, in o~•dez• to ea~'~"y out and ~aci~~tate the activities
aid p~•og~"a~ns a the I~ist~iict to conse~"ve natu~;ai ~iauree~; and
he~•eas, cez•tain ate"sl~cd ~'a~"u~~.s ~ve~"e established in ~~~g bounty a~ad the"ough
tl~e voluntary association off' agencies and entities situated ~v~th~n the part~cula~~ ~ate~•hed basins
ar areas ~i.e.~ noqualr~~ie Watershed ~'ot"urn; e~~•IL~~e ~hlnto~l~~n~.~~n~sh ater~hed
~~o~un~; C~1ee~~Duv~an~isl~lent~•al ~'uet o~~nd ate~•shed ~ar~~nx} ~'o~"the purpose o~`add~"esin
a~~d responding to enviranr~~ental needs within their respective ~ratershed basins and in tl~e t"elan
by cooperative efforts; and
l.~ hereas, the'U~'atershed or~~~~~s inc~~~de ~~epresetltatives of~u~{indiction that are
located ~vitl~in o~• have a zna~or i~xterest i~x the n~anagen~nt ofate~i eso~~rces Xnvento~"y ~A~"ea .
8 and 9; and
~ . he~•eas, the District leas reviecd the grant appl~cat~on su.bn~itted by Recipient
and has deter~nined that tiae app~xcation ~ncets tlxe requ.ire~ne~~ts o~ hapte~+ 89,08 the
District's policies and p~~cc~d.u~"e fa~~ a~~rarciin ~"ar~t ar~c~ the ~`i~~~dir~g p~4~t~clpies etahi~siled by
ding bounty's ~e~o~~a~ ate" ua~ity on~~nittee; and .
l.7 hey"eas, tlxe Dist"ict an~i ~.ecipie~~t c~e~i~"e to et~tet* znto the A.gre~n~ent ~oz" tine
purpose of establishing the terns and conditions relat~n to t~~e district's apt"ci a~' a ~~{at~t to
~ecii~ie~~t,
~'ae ~ ofd
ecrpient~s expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in tl~e
recipient's accounting ~•eco~"~. ~f requested, ~ecipier~t shall c~n~ply ~~ith ather reasonable
~•equests nude by the Dish{icy with respect to the ~nan~~x" in which pta~ect e~pendit~res a~~e
tracked and accounted far in recipient's accounting books and records. recipient sha11 rnaintain
such records of expenditures a zx~a~ be necessary to conforms to generally accepted accour~tin.g
principals and. to meet the ~`equire~~ents of all applicable state a~~d federal Ia~vs.
~ecipie~t shall be requi~"ed to t~"act ~ro~ect e~per~e ~~ir~g the ~3~~det Acco~~ntin
and ~ea~~ting System for the State of ashingtor~
~.8 The District or its representative slaa~l have the ~"ight fro~~~ time to tune, at
reasonable intervals, to ar~dit the recipient's books and records in order to vex"ify catnplianc with the ter~~~s of tl~is A.grcen~ent. recipient sl~all coaperate ~~h the D~st~ICt in
any uc~~ audit.
~.9 Reci lent ~ha11 retain all accounting records and pz"o~ect files ~•elatin to this
A. reernent ire accordance Frith critez"ia established in tl~e devised fade of Washington and the
Washington State ~.~•chivist.
l a ~eci Tent shall ensure that all work perfar~ned ~y Recipient a~` its e~~plo~ees,
agents, contractors or subcontractors perfarmed in a n~a~~1er which protects and safeguards the
envirann~ent a~ad ~~atural resources and which i in compliance with lacal, state and federal laws
and ~"egulations. Recipient shall ~r~~len~ent an appra~~"iate rnar~ito~•in~ syten~ ar ~ra~iarn to
ensure compliance ~~ith this ~;a~isian.
~.l 1 Reoi ient a Tees to inden~zxify, defend and hold har~niess tlxe District, its elected
~ ~ ar appointed. officials, e~~xplayees and agents, f~"o~x~ all claims, alleged Iiability, da~~~ages, losses
to o~" death ofperson o~• damage to p~opet~t~ allegedly resulting from the ~~egligent o~; interrtxonal
acts of tl~e Reci ie~~t ar any of its e~nployees, agents, contractor"s or subcontractors in connectioza
p v~ith this Agreement.
~ Recipient agrees to ackno~edge the District s a source of fundiz~ fog` this
p~{affect ors all literatu~•c, signa~e ar p~~ess releases ~"elated to said project,
Tl~is Aree~r~ent shall be binding upon and. inure to tl~e benefit of tl~e pay"ties
~~ereto and their respective succcsso~s and assigns.
This A.g~'ee~~ent eonst~t~~tes the ent~~"e agreement bet~vee~x the parties 'w~tl~ respect
to tl~e subject nxatter hereof. Na prior or co~~ten~poraneous re~~rese~~tation, inducen~e~~t, pro~nxse
or a.g~"eerrret hcteen a~~ az~a~xg the l~rties which ~•elate to the suh~eet ~~~atter l~crcof ~la~ch a~~c
trot embodied in this .Agree~~~e~~t sl~all be of a~~y farce o~` effect
Page of ~
.w ~h
` T rl F ' i ~ i~
+ Yti r
{ ~ 7 I Ali ~ e -u' o - - ~ _ - -
I
I
yi C _
~r.~aeca ` '
- .s F.I ~ f1' ~ _ ' y' _ i r1- ~i I - _ ~k ~ F - .s ~F~ ~ ~ 5 t ~ ~ s ~ ~ I
r..~. 4 x _ t.
n ~
! ..,r. ~
- 5
- - - - - - - I - - -
y t f 4 ~ - -
_ Vie- _ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ tv . ~ _i'r:+` . ~ti-
•
t
15 _ _ _ ti
- ~ . ~t - p ~ - 4 . ~ . ri , r a _ I i I i - .J J
1~
~ I
_
r ~ , ~
~ ~ I i 1; ~ - - - - - - -
V V
a y
w x
I I
if
n I
u
. }
i
salmonids including ESA-listed Chinaak and steelhead are either iacubatiag or rearing in this part of
the green River, This segment of the green River is also heavily used by several species of salmon
and tract far spauvnir~g and migration
Far the Fenster Phase II levee Setback project, the City plans to continue to work with Icing County
as was lane as the Fenster levee Phase 11 setback praject to make the praject mare cast effectiveF
King County developed expertise designing and constructing levee setback projects in this reach of
the green River while working on the Pautzke and Fenster l levee setback projects, immediately - adjacent to the Fenster Phase II levee Setback 1Norkin with ding bounty to construct
the Fenster
levee Setback Phase II praject will require less detailed piano and less construction oversight due to
their familiarity with similar levee setback projects in this reach of the green River. To date, l~Cing
bounty has helped the City identify cast saving measures for the Phase 11 Levee Setback praject such
as reusing cut soils an-site rather than paying to haul them aff~site for ~ispasal.
Following construction of the levee setback, the site will be replanted and monitored. The Clty intends
to partner with the Veteran's Conservation Corps in order to carry out the replanting and monitoring work. ll~aintenance activities will continue for at least three years fallowing praject
car~pletian to
achieve a 9D~Io plant survival rate. As a part of the praject, ~4 by 3~ inch educational signs will be
installed at the two entrances to the project site to describe the purpose and benefits Qf the project
and to acknowledge the project sponsors.
To date, sixty percent plans have been completed attached}. Conceptual crass sectional and plan views of the levee setback are also attached to this application far reference. grant
funds would be
used far finalising the design, completing the permitting, and completing construction of the levee
setback praject.
fatural ~esouree improvement fictions -describe how the project will address ~
r~inir~um of one o~the natural resource in~provere~t actions described on pale of
the application instructions. Consider the f ollowin in your answer to this question
UUha~ natural resources will be unproved? Uilhat are ~~e knows needs, ads or de~icl~s
~~rat will be a~~ressed? what are the known ~eneflts ~o soll, water, alr, pants, f1sFr and
wr'l~lrfe, ~anafowners~
This project is closely associated with the "Direct Improvement of hfatural Resource anditions"
natural resource improvement action. As a result of the project, S~0 feet of levee will beset back to
open up instream, riparian and flaadplain habitat. This addltianal habitat will serve as aff~channel
habitat far juvenile salr~onids, including SSA-listed Chinook and steelhead that are incubating or
rearing in the green RiverF Fish populations found in the river include Cabo juveniles and adults, Chinook juveniles fall stages}, cutthroat, bull trout, steelhead, sockeye, pink and
chum.
This site is a critical location within the Green River system, located at the break between the
. functions of the louver and riddle Green River. with the minimal amount of habitat and refuge
available downstream, this praject will be one of the first refuge sites for adult salmon in their
upstream migration, and one of the fast refuge sites for juvenile salmon during their outmigratian to Puget Sound. This praject will allow j~rvenile salmanid access to a previously cut-off
forested bench
and side channel, and provide refuge during critical migration periods The project will meet the-
follawingobjectives: improve water quality, improve riparian habitat and access, provide increased
area for flood storage ar~d flood velocity attenuation, and provide high quality off~channel habitat
access. The praject is included in the v11RIA 9 Habitat Plan ~~g05} as praject i~~~ Feaster Phase I I coos the number one ranked project during the X009 SRFB grant round by the Technical
Advisory
raup. This ranking was approved by the Uvatershed ecosystem Forum,
iV~em~er Jurlsdlctlon 1Nl~lA l*orum ~rar~t ~~o~rar~, Appllcatl~n • July ~.8, 2~a~
Project Activities and il~easurabie Jesuits ~ using the table below, lisf specific project
activities to be completed, the timetableforthe activities, and the deliverables
associated with these activities Donsiderthe following in your answer to this question:
U1Ih~# ~C~t~1~, 1~~`er1~e~?~IO~?, p~orrrl, e~`Vf~~~ Vlrf~~ deplDyed?
activity Deliverables Tin~eiine Approx~i~nate
Description Activity host
{aurce~
complete cultural cultural Resources study a~~a~~~o~ ~ FRB}
resources
re uirements complete project complete set of AB~B plans from 1 a~a~~~o~ ~ G4,aa0 ~BRFB}
plans {~~~°l~ design} contractor
complete and submit pity of Auburn, state and federal ~ ~I~~I~a~ ~ 4,aaa ~RFB~
' project perrnit permi#s ubrnitted ' a lications
4; Hire project Bid Awarded aB~O~IZ~~~ T.B.D.
contractor
Begin project Cans#ruction started o~~~1~D~ ~ nla
construction
complete construction completed 04~~I0~ ~ 42~, ~ 0~ construction ~ or~struction survey ~~g~,~o3 CRI=B,
onstructionll~ngineering 35,00 Auburn,
- Invasive species removed $~D0x00a
from .8 acres
880 linear feet of levee
setback levee cut, setback trench cut,
setback trench native fill,
rip-rap fill, setback levee
native fill, material haul,
geo-grid intaf lotion} - Pfacemen# of ~ l~ Iog
clusters
R Riparian plant installation ;
of x,72 plants on ,8
acres
~ project interpretive signs designed and
installed on-site
complete monitoring Monitoring and stewardship plan ~ ~ 10~1~0~ T.B.D.
and stewardsl~i Ian
Maintenance and Maintain site and monitor ~Q~3~~D~5 T,B,D, monitorin conditions
effectiveness see page of appl~cat`ron instructions for definition} ~ describe howthe :
project gill effectively i~npler~ent the natural resource ir~prover~ent measures
identified in question Nat above. Donsider the following in your answer to this
questian~ ~IUhy is the primary ~ppiicar~~ the hest er~tf~y to deliver the prapod
pro~a~r/servie%r~terverr~~or~? 11Vh~ r ~~re eap~cl~y of the primary ap~f~ean~ to ~ellver
~V1emb~r Jurisdiction tII~RIA Forum Grant Program, A~pli~~t~~~ July ~.5, ~~OS
the ~ropvsed ~rar/e~vi~/int~rver~~ror~? ~Uf~a~ ~oa~, ervfce ar~d par#r~~r will ,fie
brouht~obear~
The City of Auburn completed Phase l of the Fenster Levee Setback project using Salmon Recovery
Funding Board funds In ~g08. Phase I of the setback is located adjacent to the proposed Phase I1
setback location and has similarities to the Phase I I project. The City of Auburn worked with King
County in artier to complete Phase I of the project and intends to work with King County again to
complete Phase II of the project. King County has experience setting back other levees in the
irn~nediate vicinity of this project ~e,g~ Paut~ke Levee Setback completed in ~4Dg},The past successes that the City of Auburn and Ding County have completed setting back levees in this
section
of the green River will help to ensure the success of Phase ll of the Fenster Levee Setback. The City
of Auburn also intends to partner with the Veteran's Conservation Carps to conduct replanting and
monitoring of the site.
Same of the initial work far the Fenster Levee Setback Phase II project has already been completed.
Sixty percent plans have been completed {attached} anal drafts of many of the permitting documents
have been prepared. A survey of the site is currently in progress,
. ~~fieieney ~ pale of appl~cat~on instructions for definitions =describe haw the
pra~ectw~ii efficiently ir~~len~ent the natural resource improverr~ent measures
identified in question No. above. Consider the follawin in your answer to this
question: Now will ~f~e proposed ~rarar~/service/ ln~ervea#io~ enae r'r~ oo~~~no~r'or~
with related ef~or~s? Now does your strategy hest leverage resources
Both King County and the City of Auburn have conducted levee setback projects in the past slang this
section of the green Riven From this past experience, efficiencies have been developed. Initial
engineering cast estimates for Phase II of the project have been reduced significantly by finding ways
to make use of the excavated fill on-site rather than having to dispose of it off sits, Constructing this levee setback will complete a two~mile corridor of restored habitat in Auburn
and Icing County. The
adjacent projects have been designed to fit together seamlessly to maximl~e the benefits of the
overall restored corridor Phase ll of the Fenster Levee Setback has received a $~a4, ~ 0 grant tram
the State alrnar~ Recovery Funding Board that would be leveraged with the King Conservation
District Funds.
In order to increase the efficiency of the project, the City of Auburn is proposing to contract with King
County to complete the design and construction of the levee setback project. King County worked on
the design and cnr~struction of both of the adjacent upstream levee setback projectst Phase I Fenster
Levee Setback and the Pautzke Levee Setback, With these past projects, Icing County has became
familiar with the design and construction techniques used for levee setback projects an this reach of the green River, This familiarity with the levee setback projects in the area should
translate into lower
project casts. Ullorking vtirith King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, vllater and
Land Resources Division directly to complete the design and construction will offer significant project
savings since full specifications and a bid package are not rewired under this approach this is similar
to the approach used~on the previous Fenster and Pautzke projects},
The alternative would be for Auburn to put the levee setback project out for competitive bid, This
would require the completion of full plans and bid specifications which would raise the project casts by
up to percent and would require the City to identify a source of additional funding to complete the
project, Due to King County's far~illarity with the project, and the tune and cast savings that would be realized, the City of Auburn proposes to work with King County to complete the
design and
construction for the Fenster Levee Phase II setback project.
Equity see pale of appificativn ir~tructionsfordefinition} - describe howthe project
will equitably ir~pler~ent the natural resource innproverent measures identified in
N~em~er aur~s~~ction & w~l~ dorm grant ~ro~rarr~, Ap~~i~at~on ~~aly ~.8, ~~DB
uestior~ No~ ~ wave. Consider the fol~ow~n in yournswer to this question. ~n h~
park of the District will the pro~oed pror~n~/erv~c%t~~e~ven~ro~ acaur~ ~U~ro ~ the
~are~ audience and ~vha~ demographic ect~ian o~ dire car~r~uni~y ~nriii be afl~ec~ed~
The Fenster ~.evee Sethaclc Restoration Il projectwil~ be constructed within tl~e existing Auhurr~
Fenster Nature ParkF Once the construction is completed for this praject the property will be open to
the public for passive recreations! activities and provide opportunities far both formal and inforrr~a~
environmental education instruction
Evaluation of Intended Results -describe the evaiuat~on mechanisms you wii~ use to
track, document and report that the project has achieved the intended results
described in questions
Project metrics such as linear feet of levee set hack and square feet of floodplain opened up will he
calculated upon complet#on of the project and included in progress and final reports to the King
' conservation District. One of the d~liverahles for the project is a monitarir~g and stews~dship plan ' which will he developed and carried out by the pity of Auburn following the construction
of the project.
A required by King onservatiar~ District policies, msir~tensnce of praject plantings for a minimum of
three years will be incorporated into the monitoring and stewardship plan for the project,
8. Project udet expenses
Budget Item I~(CD Funds ether Funds ether Funds Total Salmon pity of Auburn
Recovery tarm
Funding Funds**
Baard*
salaries and Benefits $0 $0 $D g
Travel/I~ea~s/I~~leae ~ ~ ~ ~
Office~Field Su lies $aa $g 0 ~aa contracted! ~ 9,5oD ~~o, X03 $~~,~aD ~g4,G03
Professional Services
t,and Acquisition ~
Permits a 34,aaa 0 34,Oaa
ToTA~ ~oo,o~o ~~o~,~ o~ ~~:ooo o
The pity of Auburn executed a Salmon Recovery Funding hoard grant agreement in the amount
of $304,10 with the whingtan Recreation and Canservativn office on April 5, ~~o~
**0ity of Auburn Storm Funds are in the process of being allocated toward the Fenster t,evee
Setback Phase ll project a part of the pity's n~id~year budget an~endn~ent scheduled for city
0ouncil action ors dune
~lembe~ ~€~risdi~#ivn & 111IRiA ~o~~,m grant P~o~r~m, Application ~ luly ~.8, aD~
9~ i+S~pA~knawlederr~ent~ pe~ribe hawthe ~{CD will be acl~nawledged ~s a sv~r~e of
funding far the ~r~poed ~rog~n~/ervi~e~interventian ~~ee ~rar~t ~rorr~ overview
Policies, general Grant Praran~ P~~~cies,
in projec# press releases, the pity of auburn wiil include ac~nowiedernent that funds were received from th Ong o ~ ti ~ri~c'~ a educat~on~~ signs ~n~tal~ed of fhe entrances to fhe project
side wi ack~awledge ~ a p~oje er~
~ ~ ~ ~
Authorized i ature date
~ 1 1 1 1 R
~em~er ~~~~sdfc#ian & 1rI+R~A I*orum ~ran# Program, Appli~a#ion July X008