HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-20-2010 ITEM III-C.' `��:
C I TY OF
^rte. �:#,;..�� rF✓,'•.:�`:,:
>s:
F==`j AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
WASHINGTON
Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4642 Date: September 14, 2010
Department: Planning and Attachments: Resolution No. 4642, Budget Impact: NIA
Development Pierce County ordinance No. 2009-
113s, and Interlocal Agreement
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4642.
Background Summary:
In November 2006, the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) requested proposals to develop
countywide affordable housing implementation plan and recommend new countywide affordable housing
policies. Pacific Municipal Corporation (PMC) was the selected consultant to work with Pierce County on
developing these policies. Pierce County received a grant from Department of Commerce (formerly
CTED) to update the affordable housing distribution and the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPB) for the
cities and towns and the County. Affordable housing policies have been part of initial CPPs.
PMC worked with the Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC), a staff level committee in
which Auburn is involved, in developing recommended amendments to the CPPs to address affordable
housing. This work began in December 2006 and continued through month 2007. During March 2007,
PCRC held three workshops on affordable housing and took feedback on how the policies should be
shaped. The GMCC continued work on the draft policy amendments to the CPP and provided a
recommendation to the PCRC August 2008. The PCRC. began their review of the draft policy
amendments September 2008. On May 21, 2009 the PCRC recommended adoption of the proposed
amendments to the CPPs with a technical amendment made on July 16, 2009. The Pierce County
Council took action on the amendments to the CPPs on February 16, 2010.
The proposed amendments revise the definitions; state that jurisdictions should consider meeting
affordable housing needs through innovative techniques, availability of services, and incentives; and
jurisdictions should explore various opportunities. Jurisdictions do not have the ability to make line item
modifications; this is a pass or fail policy choice.
L0920-2
A1.17
Reviewed by Council & Committees:
Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
❑ Arts Commission
COUNCIL COMMITTEES:!
❑ Building
❑
M&O
❑ Airport
® Finance
❑ Cemetery
❑
Mayor
❑ Hearing Examiner
❑ Municipal Serv.
❑ Finance
❑
Parks
❑ Human Services
® Planning & CD
❑ Fire
®
Planning
❑ Park Board
❑ Public Works
® Legal
0
Police
❑ Planning Comm.
❑ Other
❑ Public Works
❑
Human Resources
❑ Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval:
Council Approval:
Referred to
Tabled
❑Yes ❑No
❑Yes ❑ No
Until _
Until
Councilmember: Norman
Meeting Date: September 20, 2010
Call for Public Hearing 1 1
1 1
1 1
Staff: Snyder
Item Number: V11 I. B.2
AUBURN MORE THAN You IMAGINED
RESOLUTION NO. 14 6 4 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WITH PIERCE COUNTY, THEREBY AMENDING THE
PIERCE COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING
POLICIES
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became
effective (Chapter 36.70A Revised Code of Washington); and
WHEREAS, on January 31, 1995, the Pierce County Council passed Resolution
R95-17 affirming the commitment of the County to continue discussions with other local
jurisdictions to resolve Implementation of the Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires Counties, Cities and Towns to
plan for housing affordable to all economic segments of the population; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies are written policy
statements which are to be used solely for establishing a countywide framework from
which the County and Municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted; and
WHEREAS, Pierce County initially adopted its initial Countywide Planning
Policies on June 30, 1992 and affordable housing policies are a component of the initial
Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, in November 2006, the Pierce County Regional Council solicited
proposals to formulate countywide affordable housing implementation plan and
recommend new countywide affordable housing policies; and
WHEREAS, a series of public workshops were conducted over a three-day
period in March 2007, soliciting input for the countywide affordable housing strategy;
and
Resolution No. 4642
September 7, 2010
Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, recommendations for a countywide affordable housing strategy from
the consulting firm of Pacific Municipal Consulting (PMC) was published on June 15,
2007; and
WHEREAS, the City participated in the amendment process and helped develop
the proposed Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies through participation in
Pierce County's Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC); and
WHEREAS, the GMCC is a staff level committee that reviews amendments to
the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies and makes recommendations to the
Pierce County Regional Council; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Regional Council recommended adoption of the
proposed amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies on July 16,
2009; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
must be adopted. through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or by a new
interlocal agreement ratified by 60 percent of member jurisdictions in Pierce County
representing 75 percent of the total population; and
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement titled "Amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies " was developed for this purpose, and attached to the
recommended amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows;
Section 1. The amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies are attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
Resolution No. 4642
September 7, 2010
Page 2 of 3
Section 2. The interlocal agreement is hereby acknowledged and accepted by
the city of Auburn, thereby amending the Pierce county countywide Planning Policies
in accordance with the requirements of the Interlocal cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter
39.34 RCW.
Section 3. That a copy of the resolution and signed interlocal agreement
authorizing approval shall be provided to Pierce county.
Section 4. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 5. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and signed this day of
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
iel B. H6td, City Attorney
Resolution No. 4642
September 7, 2010
Page 3 of 3
. 2010.
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 4642
Proposed Amendments to the
Countywide
Planning Policies.
for Pierce County, Washington
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 1 of 8
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICY ON THE "NEED
FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL ECONOMIC SEGMENTS
OF THE POPULATION AND PARAMETERS FOR ITS DISTRIBUTION"
■ Background - Requirement of Growth Management Act
The Washington Growth Management Act identifies as a planning goal to guide
the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development
regulations that counties and cities encourage the availability of affordable
housing to all economic segments of the population, promote a variety of
residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of the
existing housing stock. [RCW 36.76A.626(4)] The term "affordable housing" is
not defined, but the context in which it appears suggests that its meaning was
intended to be broadly construed to refer to housing of varying costs, since the
reference is to all economic segments of the community.
The Washington Growth Management Act also identifies mandatory and
optional plan elements. [RCW 36.70A.070 and .0801. A Housing Element is a
mandatory plan element that must, at a minimum, include the following [RCW
36.70A.070(2)]:
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 2 of 8
Since the Comprehensive Plan of every city and county must be an internally
consistent document [RCW 36.70A.070] and all plan elements must be
consistent with the future land use map prepared as part of the required land
use element [RCW 36.70A.070], these other plan elements will, to a great
extent, dictate what will be in the housing element.
Thus, the land use element, relying upon estimates of future population, growth,
average numbers of persons per household, and land use densities, will
indicate how much (and where) land needs to be made available to
accommodate the identified housing needs. The capital facilities, transportation
and utilities elements will then indicate when and how public facilities will be
provided to accommodate the projected housing, by type, density and location.
■ Countywide Planning Policy
1. The County= and each municipality in the County, shall determine the extent
of the need(.i. ., for housing for all economic segments of the
.....................................
:b projected for
population ._.»=p
lui`�n over the planning period.
1 11
OEM
r r r r r r ri JILBLW r r ~ r
— . ■ ■i
ION. ■ ■ WM ■ — . . R — ■ . i as .
W r rr r r r r r r
■ i . irowl f -Ta 1. to
■ i - i■ . - ■ . . ■ . w ii
r r
r r r r r w r s
r
r
WV-FA� r ra AL r r r r r
r r rM Lw IM q M Lw3M r W r r r r r r r r r r!PWA�rr w r
a.
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
Ab i .w . . i / . i .
.W rr . I IS &WAII 0r .12102r
1 11 11 111111 a, I I r r rr
r r r a MIA
r r W r a W
r r r r r r
W W
W 10 WVU45t 141 WWA E MI r r r 12 A WINE I a M 0 M ae r r r
— — w . i■ - ■ ■ R /
r . w r r r r r
r r r r rr r r r r
i - . w . . R . w . s ii i . ■ ■
• r r r r r r r r rdur r r
rala
ift
r
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4542
Page 3 of 8
r r w r +r r r r w r r r r r r r r
rr r r r r r r r r r + r r r w r rr
. i/ /+ i i i— i - i i i Trimr i r r
r r r
OF
■ ■ / i+ ■ i ■ ■
rr r r •r
1111
r �► r r r r r r r r r r11 lll!
i ■ R ■ i i i — i — / ■ /
r r r r• r r r• r r i r r r
i . ■ w r w ■
r r r r r
@Z1.72s: r r w r
r r r rMUlIP_wA;jrj11JW r
i . i■ ■ i
rA L'WJ LwA E 1MLwAr
i+■ i
r r r
—
r
r"W'11��Iliil I I
ii I
11
r ■ i + ■ .
r r r r r
r
■ +
r r r
r r
1 —
r r r r
■ i — ■ 1■ i ■■ + ■ — i +
r rr r
■ +
r r s r
■ /
� r
. i i
r r r
i ■ i + i ■
U Lw� r r
■ A ■
r r r
r r w r +r r r r w r r r r r r r r
rr r r r r r r r r r + r r r w r rr
. i/ /+ i i i— i - i i i Trimr i r r
r r r
OF
■ ■ / i+ ■ i ■ ■
rr r r •r
1111
r �► r r r r r r r r r r11 lll!
i ■ R ■ i i i — i — / ■ /
r r r r• r r r• r r i r r r
i . ■ w r w ■
r r r r r
@Z1.72s: r r w r
r r r rMUlIP_wA;jrj11JW r
Tie oul
ana u p F
n
_..m
�.
5 ,,5,, _
_M
z s s
. 5....
.... ... .... .............. ...:...�:::.�:::�::�^^Y-:.!: ... ..� �:'...�:::.a'R`... Kiri=
nt : o rfu �f� a ;;: = reaM
�e ,
i.
5:. war •s:::<<-:-�:s:::...,:- , ,: 5 �'s:..,::,,:.a,.,,.., ��......... ��,<<q;;ii��;;���:;.<r<x<y:•r
E<3
rehabilitafor f _: k ��� n=
x �_.
... .....
.. ....... ......i,s.3 s `
.,..`. �.<.3«--::<5. ...� �.,s.*., jc•:-r...:%�'EM<'.... ...r—.'. }'i...: ? :.; v,;vs i•; -w -w
.. .:: ..:. ..
, n,
.'.i:
J.
s
:r
..:�V': ... ..
p .e .atiom,
.
liea■ i r -
�� r rrrr r r r r r M�l
w r r• r " ■ w r —
r r r
. ................................. ... ........
................:....:::..:.:::::::.............::.::::::::::::::::- ..;..................................a:.:::::E�,;::<::::;a:::
.. .. .......... .................>>. ..., ................. ............. �.:E. �...:....:.:�::...:::•:::�:::..r�.........�7.�..K....r,..r.....,-•:sir:::.:...::.:.:...:::.. ..... ... .. ..,t'..0 ...�....^...... ........ ... ...........
.. .... .... ........ ............ .... . e ................................. �.. .. ....�, s...._.....1......... ..........................., s .......,.......... 1�'�� • ni�lR:Ef�E««s:;E... ....
r
r e tt , e
eo : __ u 5 +� Eu
e of exeP _ ::
F r ur -3 _� _ r .
■ ... ......e.... ... .�... ............. ....... c!:::: �. �.., c ..,. .> .5 .4i?.7':.� t, iL�.........v........... .......v..'.:�.�. ': e
.... ...�:::::::::........n..„ .:: A:�.�.:xi•::::• :., w .y -...,. e. .. .. , c!:L.:... .,:4.t ...................... ... ...�.. e.... .. .�.... n .;vr?i•i. .
. .. ......... ...... .... .1...:::x.::•::5::5::,:. "' .,:....: �.. A:.
v
..........
�..... .6.,.... ...; x'
.. ....:.: .... .......................................... . xL �!:rA,�:.... ...5,...; .�.... a::: r::..;, V F�
..
i lCl o' Y _ afolbw, . F : wy
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4842
Page 4 of 8
3.
..................
3.03..
'41
m Lw MI L -W -A a m 2 0 A I LwA I YFAW
It I I fk M 10 M 9 M Lw3W ALwAON! I A III 9L w 116FAjimmiri L
t IWJVE�m VwX14
I Lq FI Lw2 I �wA wA 0 0 1 Lm 2 19 1 A M Lw. A Mm�- 2 11 A
I AjLw-K1jtWw- ML -will !w -A 1,q k1l I MA-MALAUGA
F"a I inTak I
M Lw� r r LwM A LwAw! L-A I IN wlp�
le. ........... . ... ...
...............
.. . . .... .... ....
thd
Ali
%
4. h f6b i
............. .. ..... ......
.. . .. . .......
. .. . .............
.... .....
-;-j
rn
r nt
c J-S� rmzzl'i�
MM�WMMN,
a i o. m -, na
lzm ®rm
'r,
'W P IS I"
cc �,b ramyV,1',
INIR
On d-
12'09
glNI
zz ME
auc
Otto -u,
A ho, -s
cc di h
mjqMMII
All
M, P" 0
and
..... . ... .
.'roafa
9 n
.............
d Ti te, M4
....... ...............
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 5 of 8
5V�
..............
.........
...... ............:sr:r.:::a:: s:n , ...... ....K:»,,,�:xi.r.'i,'y?5�'..: "?i:::::"•i' i::':.:: ::.:::<::::... ..v .?i
y.
.. ........... ................b
�s€J1ro _ e.
. ....:.::.:::::::::::::::::: �:::: S.F:^:FF:a:`e:fftit:::i:::.�:;:':iu. �...s.Ni••� y.-•--•• `:IB;K^.T.:::.. •�k� s.u.NS�'Eif',^.°F,F
k.':.o �'r'a.��:"�� ::. ..�c.':SF:•F?»>it E ^ ..
....................... .. .
5.........................
A.
...................
5 J Uri%
C.OnaJ
..........
............
.........................:...:..:::.::s:;,.:ss::::::s::...:::.....:...:....
. :::jai:•s..^::,:.-y.....:::..:::::::::<:::::::::...::ix i':�:i. n...... s..r..^..e s..^...... t..x ...... .. .... ...... ..
... .s......_...._.�..... ... .. i .. .. .......�..... .......E��.a��� .e. .......k....... F......�e..�I . � .... ... �:.;��-..,...«:-. %. .......:z'?. ............... ....,... �....
......................... i........................................ r .F. �...... ..., r...-.,,.,.s....,..fe........s�°�R..:saa..Ir...........v....,,.......E£.�?4iss......... s...i.s.............�. ...........:.:_::.
....... Rix-�........w....�........s...... ...s..... �... ...h . .. .. ...:?v 5x..� �,.. ..,..!: .:. ..
...... .::.. , . .. .
5:
...................... ....,............ --�,......:............................ .............................. .�, . F .. �.._ ..7 tea,:• •<<1 •�
.. ..... ........................ .. .:.................... � .F ... ......i....... .� ........CO. 6. The..o ume Y
5,q ..
a ^
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 6 of 8
6=-
6:3
......................
. ......................
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 7of8
........ .
............................... .
�:..:::::,::,. .rv--a gym:: •.�-:::::_..... ,.....,:::
..............................................
..
n t n
n -y R to rrro ate
and asseh sWI �� _ _
.......::::.:..:....:.....:..:.................
.M
...t
..... .. ..rIµ a o at�o�nth........ . ...r ya:.
..............
.....................
e:::
..... ...... c oa
85.
n con un on with the growth 1Ia
�.
A at;
............
.....
c?.:, .. i'.< ;`: ..:;' .... ,... �< ;--; ::;;; : IES ::• :: . ,N.s::.. ': ... <:; ::.:....
;;7-7z
m u oa w
�o nl
rde omth P R
C3rto.:.or►t ,,. a -.., :.:........_.. _..
.................
....... r
a
m _._
.: .... .... .. ... .. .... ............rep
. ..:: ^::::.:.::.:r... F.................... .r... .. .. s.. �:::....: .s. ,•r............F...., ....... .......... ..... .. ..a... .....i �.. .:,iii:
addre1n thergres ne unha
�u�
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4642
Page 8of8
1 Sponsored by: Councilmember Roger Bush
2 Requested by: County Executive/Planning and Land Services
3
4
5
6
7
s ORDINANCE NO. 200'9=1 13s
9
10
11
12
13 An Ordinance of the Pierce County Council Acknowledging Its Approval of
14 a Proposed Amendment to the Affordable Housing ,Policies
15 in the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies as
16 Recommended by the Pierce County Regional Council;
17 Authorizing the Pierce County Executive to Execute an
18 Interlocal Agreement(s) with the Cities and Towns of Pierce
19 County to Ratify the Proposed Amendment; and Adopting
20 Findings of Fact.
21
22 Whereas, the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) was created in 1992 by
23 interlocal agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County,
24 and charged with responsibilities, including: serving as a local link to the Puget Sound
25 Regional Council, promoting intergovernmental cooperation, facilitating compliance with
26 the coordination and consistency requirements of the Growth Management Act and the
27 Regional Transportation Planning Organization (Chapter 47.80 Revised Code of
28 Washington [RCW]), and developing a consensus among jurisdictions regarding the
29 development and modification of the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies; and
30
31 Whereas, on January 31, 1995, the Pierce County Council passed Resolution
32 No. R95-17 affirming the commitment of the County to continue discussions with other
33 focal jurisdictions to resolve implementation of the Growth Management Act (CMA); and
34
35 Whereas, the GMA requires Counties, Cities and Towns to plan for housing
36 affordable to all economic segments of the population; and
37
38 Whereas, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies are written policy
39 statements which are to be used solely for establishing a countywide framework from
40 which the County and Municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted; and
41
az Whereas, the framework is intended to ensure that the County and Municipal
43 comprehensive plans are consistent; and
44
45
L0920-2
Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 1 of 4 034 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
DISTRIBUTION:
Pat McCarthy, count Ex
Y u tive
Pierce county Library
Municipal Re rch and Services tenter
Law Library
State Examiner
Susan Long, Code Revisor
Linda !Medley, Legal Cler
Council Record Book
Chuck Kleeberg, director, Planning ann�ng and Land ices
Sean Gaffney, Planning g and Lan ervices
Paula manning, PGRc Clerk
Pete Phi e r Prosecuting Attorney
P C R C
GMCC
i
Date/initials
1
2
3
4
5
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
20
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
35
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Whereas, Pierce county initially adopted its initial Countywide Planning Policies
on June 30, 1992; and
Whereas, affordable housing policies are a component of the initial Pierce
County Countywide Planning Policies; and
Whereas, in [november 2006, the Pierce county Regional council solicited
proposals to formulate countywide affordable housing implementation plan and
recommend new countywide affordable housing policies; and
Whereas, a series of public workshops were conducted over a three-day period
in March 2007, soliciting input for the countywide affordable housing strategy; and
Whereas, recommendations for a countywide affordable housing strategy from
the consulting firm of Pacific Municipal consulting (PMC) was published on June 15,
2007; and
Whereas, the Growth Management coordinating committee reviewed PMC's
recommendation and forwarded its recommended modifications to the Pierce county
Regional Council; and
Whereas, the Pierce county Regional council conducted negotiations in open
public meetings during 2007, 2003, and 2009 to address substantive policy changes
necessary to respond to current issues related to the coordination and consistency with
the GMA; and
Whereas, the Pierce county Regional council subsequently recommended
adoption of the proposed amendments to the Pierce county countywide Planning
Policies on May 21, 2009, which address policy updates; and
Whereas, on July 10, 2009 the Pierce county Regional council approved a
technical amendment to its May 21, 2009 recommendation; and
Whereas, amendments to the Pierce county Countywide Planning Policies must
be adopted through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or by a new
interlocal agreement ratified by 50 percent of member jurisdictions in Pierce county
representing 75 percent of the total population; and
Whereas, an Interlocal Agreement entitled "Amendments to the Pierce county
Countywide Planning Policies" was developed for this purpose, and included the
recommended amendments to the Pierce county countywide Planning Policies as an
attachment; and
Ordinance No. 2009-113s
Page 2of4
Pierce county Council
930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Whereas, these revised and additional Countywide Planning Policies should be
incorporated into the next amendment of the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies by Ordinance of the County Council; and
Whereas, the Pierce County Planning Commission, at its September 22, 2009,
regular public hearing, reviewed the proposed amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies and recommended approval; and
Whereas, an environmental review of the proposed amendments to the Pierce
County Countywide Planning Policies was conducted pursuant to RCW 43.21 C and an
Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on November 16, 20091 and
Whereas, after a properly noticed public hearing, the Community Development
Committee of the County Council considered oral and written testimony and forwarded
its recommendation to the full Council; and
Whereas, the County Council held a public hearing on February 16, 2010 where
oral and written testimony was considered; and
Whereas, the County Council finds that it is in the public interest to authorize the
Pierce County Executive to execute the interlocal agreement; Now Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of Fierce County:
Section 1. The Pierce County Council hereby acknowledges its approval of the
amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies recommended by the
Pierce County Regional Council, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The Pierce County Executive is hereby authorized to execute the
Interlocal Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B and by this reference incorporated
herein, thereby ratifying the attached amendments to the Pierce County Countywide
Planning Policies as recommended by the Pierce County Regional Council.
Ordinance No. 2009-113s
Page 3 of 4
Pierce County Council
930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1045
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
19
11
12
3
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Section 3. Findings of Fact are hereby adapted as described in Exhibit C which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED this y4`day of�,��, 2010.
ATTEST:
D Ise D. nso�)
Clerk of the Council
PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL
Pierce County, Washington
-4
Raper Bush
Cow.adl-Chair
Pat McCarthy / �
Pierce Count E�Cecutive v
Approved� V o d ,this
day of ,
2010.
Date of Publication of
Notice of Public Hearing: (
Effective Date of Ordinance: 6,
Ordinance
ordinance No. 2009-113s
Page 4 of 4
Pierce County Council
930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1 046
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
19
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
29
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
39
31
32
33
34
35
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009�113s
Proposed Amendments to the
Countywide
Planning Policies
for Pierce County, Washington
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 1 of 7 930 Tacoma Ave 5, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
25
27
28
29
3C
31
3�
31k;
3E
3%
3(
31
3�
3(,
4(
4'
44
4;
4�
4!
4+
4'
4
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICY ON THE "NEED
FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL ECONOMIC SEGMENTS
OF THE POPULATION ANIS PARAMETERS FOR ITS DISTRIBUTION '
Background - Re wrement of Growth Management Act
The Washington Growth Management .Act identifies as a planning goal to guide the
development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations that counties
and cities encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
populations promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of the existing housing stock. [RCW 36.70A.020(4)] The term "affordable
housing" is not defined, but the context in which it appears suggests that its meaning was
intended to be broadly construed to refer to housing of varying costs, since the reference is to all
economic segments of the community.
The Washington Growth Management Act requires the adoptiM.of countywide planning
policies for affordable housing in order to establish a consistent uptY-gide. framework from
which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted. These: policies are
required to, at a minimum, `consider the need.four. affordable housing, : such as housing for all
economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution' [RCw
36.70A.210(3)(e)].
The Washington Growth Management Act also identifies mandatory and optional plan
elements. [RCW 36.70A.070 and .080]. A Housing Element is a mandatory plan element that
must, at a minimum, include the %]lowing [RCW 36.70A.070(2)1:
(a) an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the
number of housing units necessary to manage projected .:growth,
(b) a statement of goals, policies and objectives and mandatory provisions for the
preservation, improvement and development of housing, including single-family
residences,
(c) identification of sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government -
assisted housing, housing for low income families, manufactured housing, multi -family
housing, group homes, and foster care facilities, QML.L.&&A^I%WI%J ? ` 13
A adequate provisions for existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments
of the community.
Since the Comprehensive Plan of every city and county must be an internally consistent
document [RCW 36.70A.070] and all plan elements must be consistent with the future land use
map prepared as part of the required land use element[RCW 36.70A.0701, these other plan
elements will, to a great extent, dictate what will be in the housing element.
Thus, the land use element, relying upon estimates of future population, growth, average
numbers of persons per household, and land use densities, will indicate how much (and where)
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 2 of 7 930 Tacarnacama WA 98402
1 land needs to be made available to accommodate the identified housing needs. The capital
2 facilities, transportation and utilities elements will then indicate when and hover public facilities
3 will be provided to accommodate the projected housing, by type, density and location.
4
5 Countmide Planning _Policy
6
7 l . The County, and each municipality in the County, shall determine the extent of the need
8 _: ��� for housing for all economic segments of the population , both
9 existing and projected for thta., %efwels ity its . jurisdiction over the planning period.
10
11 ,
2 ,
1 3 s F�In6 T %QH t.-Affl... eats
1
4And r.;MP0_iQI LAIIQln" t3 =a
15
16
17 ,
i
19
29 .
er state /R/ f •
2 1Sien
h
23
24 4a■
25 ■
26
27 -pJ*3
28 (Z ■
LJ STJ I
29
r ■
30 ,
31
32 `
33
34 .
35 ;
36 .
37
38
39 ,
40
41 .
42
43 _.
44
4E
47 .
4$ ._ .
Exhibit A to ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 3 of 7 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
3
iZ�izzl afirr 9
4
5 rr r
AtLiQr- eemmer-eial rzervziees
7 ,
V Leusin.
9
10 2. The County, and each municipality in the County,: should explore : and identify
1 opportunities to reutilize and redevelop existin arcelsrhere ire ab111tatan the
12 buildings is not cost-effective, provided th.e same is. cons.istent .frith the countywide policy
13 on histonc, archaeological., and Cultural preservation.
14
15 .
16
17 ■
18
19 3. The County, and each municipality in. the County, . shall. encourage the. availability of
20 housing affordable to all economic segments o f the. population for. each jurisdiction.
21
22 3.1 For the purpose of the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies the following
23 definitions shall apply.
24
25 3.1.1 "Affordable housing" shall: meant the housing .affordable to households
26 earning up: to So percent of :the: county. de: ur ian income..
..:..:::... .
.g p
7 3.1.E "Low income households" shall mean households earning o percent or
28 less of the countywide me . dia:n'.:.i. me.come.
g 3.1.3 " Moderate income households�� shall mean households earningo t6120
30 percent: of the count�nde median income.
... .
31 3.1.4 "Special Needs dousing shall mein �upporii a ous�ng opportunities or
32 populations twit specia lze requ' ire :entsa sub : as: t e p ysica y an
......
33 mentally disabled, the elderly, people with odieal c ndit"ons, the
34 homeless, victims of domestic violence, . foster youth, refugees, and
35 others.
35
3 7 3.2 Affordable housing sing needs not typically met 'by the : pri nate housing rr� arket should. be
38 addressed through a more coordinated. countywide approach/strategy.
39
40 3.2.1 Each jurisdiction may adopt plans.... d policies for meeting its -affordable
41 and moderate income housing needs irk a.:ra er that..reflects its unique
42 demographic characteristics, comprel ergs � e plan vision and polices,
43 development and infrastructure capaelty location and proximity to job
44 centers, :local workforce, an access to traysp ortation.
45
46 3.3 It shall be the goal of each jurisdiction in Pierce County that. a minimum of 25% of
......:... .
47 the growth. population allocation is satisfied tbrouh affordable housing.
48
Exhibit A to ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 4 of 7 930 Tacoma Ave 5, Rm 1048
Tacoma, INA 98402
.'
3
4
5 4. The County and each municipality in the County should establish a `countywide program by
�.
gionalg p g,
6 an organization: capable oflong-term consistent coordinat�vn of re housing tannin
7 design, development, fundingjurisdictions
, and housing rnanagenlent. All should be
...:.....::::..
8 represented in directing the workprogram and priorities of the organization.
9
19
11
12
13 5. Jurisdictions should plan to meet. their affordable and moderate -income housing needs
14 goal by utilizing a range of strategies. that will result ..in the preservation of existing, and
......:.::....:.. .
15 production of neer, affordable and moderate -income housing.
15
17 5.1 Techniques to. preserve 'existing: affordable and moderate -income housing stock
18 may include repair, maintenance, and/or rehabilitation and redevelopment in
19 order to extend the useful life of existing, affordable housing units.
20
21 5.1.1 Jurisdictions should seek and secure state. funds such as the Housing
22 Trust Fund, and federal subsidy funds such as. Co L..munity
23 Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, and other
24 sources to implement housing preservation programs.
25
26 5.2 Jurisdictions should promote the use of reasonable measures and innovative
27 techniques (e.g. clustering, accessory:Owelling units, cottage. housing, small lots,
28 planned urbandevelopments, an mix use): o. s mu a e new higher= ensu y
29 affordable and moderate -income housing stock ..on residentially- zoned vacant and
30 underutilized parcels.
31
32 5.3. To promote affordable housing, jurisdi*ctions should consi'der: the availability and
33 proximity o public transportation, governmental and:.commerclilai services
34 necessary to support .residents" needs.
35
35 5.4 Jurisdictions should consider providing: incentives to developers and builders of
37 affordable housing for moderate- and 164wzncorne.househdlds, such a.sbut not
38 limited to:
39 5.4.1 A menu of alternative development regulations (e g. higher density,
49 reduced lot width/area:, and reduced parking stalls): in exchange for
41 housing that is ensured to h affordable..
42 5.4• A toolkit ofanlal 1ncentivese.g pezrnit and fee waivers or mu
4.3 family tax exemptions and grant nit g assistance, thrQu�gh: the
44 regional housing organization, that rriay be dependent on the amount of
45 affordable housing proposed.
46 5.4.3 A toolkit of technical::: assistance::.,gmapping, expedite processing
.... .
47 and permit approval) to affordable housing developers that may be
w..
48 dependent on the. amount of affordable housing: proposed.
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 5 of 7 930 Tacoma
Tacoma, WA 98402
2 5.5 Jurisdictions should consider inclusionary zoning meas.ures as a condition of
3 major rezones and development.
4
5 5.5.1 New fully contained communities in unincorpo'ated. pierce County
8 shall contain. a Mix of dwelling units to: provde. for the affordable and
7 rn o derat e--in come housing .needs that will. be created as . a result of the
8 development.
9
10 6 • The County, and each municipality in the County, .should. cooperatively maximize available
11 local, state, and federal funding opportunities and private resources in the development of
12 affordable housing for households S.
13
14 6.1 All 'urisdictions should jointly explore; opportunities to develop a countywide
15 funding mechanism and the potential for both voter- approved measures on or
16 levy), and nonvoter approved sources. of revenue to support the development of
17 affordable housing.
18
19 6.2 All jurisdictions should pursue ..state legislative .changes to give. local jurisdictions
20 the authority to provide tax relief to developers of affordable housing.
21
22 6.3 All jurisdictions should explore opportunities to dedicate revenues from. sales of
23 publicly owned properties, including tax title sales, to affordable. housing
24 proj ects,
25
26 6. p
4 All 'urisdictions should explore the feasibility of additional resources to: facilitate
�
p housing
such. the development of affordable housin such as a new couratyv�i a organ zation
w
on inter--local. a reements ex ansion of existing non-profit partnerships,
28 (based g �� p
2 g increased co ordination 'Frith to cal public :housing autht s ties, acounty-tea e an
30 trust, as well as future involvement of larger ounty employers, in the. provision
31 of housing assistance for their workers.
32
33 67. The County, and each municipality in the County, should explore and identify
34 opportunities
35
...:..:....:. ...
30 a
tore u ce all co s or non-pro an
37 for-profit developers to build affordable housing.
p p
38
39 7.1 Jurisdictions should explore options to dedicate or.make available below market-
40 rate surplus: land for affordable housing .projects.
4 .
42 7.2 All jurisdictions should explore and identify : opportunities.. to assemble, reutilize,
43 and redevelop existing parcels.
44 •
45 .
40
�� • f� • •
47
r
48 '
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 6 of 7 930 Tacoma Ave 5, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
8. The County, and each municipality in the County, shall periodically monitor and assess their
success in meeting the housing needs to accommodate their 20 -year population allocation.
8.1 Jurisdictions should utilize the available data and analyses provided by federal, state,
and local sources to monitor their progress in meeting housing .demand as part of the
required Growth Management Act comprehensive plan update process.
8.2 Countywide housing allocations shall be periodically monitored and evaluated to
determine if countywide. needs are being :adequately met the .evaluation. should
Identify all regulatory and inaneial..measures then:: to address.: the lilac . on need..
8.3 Each jurisdiction should provide, . if available, the quantity of affordable housing,
units created, preserved, or rehabilitated since. the previous required update.
8.4 Jurisdictions should consider using a consistent reporting template for their
evaluations to facilitate the countywide monitoring and assessment.
8.5 In conjunction with. the Growth Management Act Update schedules a report should
be forwarded to the Pierce County Regional Council addressing the progress in
developing new affordable housing.
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Fierce County Council
Page 7 of 7 930 Tacoma Ave s, Rm 1046
Tacoma, VITA 96402
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2E
2c
3e
31
3`
3 r
L
3z
3%
3(
31
3�
T
4(
4'
4;
4:
4
4
4
4
4
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2009-113s
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENTS To THE PIERCE COUNTY
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
[his agreement is entered into by and among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce
�
ounty. This agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of
1967, Chapter 39.34 RCw. This agreement has been authorized by the legislative body of each
urisdiction pursuant to formal action and evidenced by execution of the signature page of this
agreement.
BACKGROUND:
�. The Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) was created in 1992 by interlocal
agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County. The
organization is charged with responsibilities, including: serving as a local link to the
Puget Sound Regional Council, promoting intergovernmental cooperation, facilitating
compliance with the coordination and consistency requirements of the Growth
Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCS') and the Regional Transportation Planning
Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing a consensus among jurisdictions
g .
regarding the development and modification of the Countywide Planning Policies.
B. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies provide for amendments to be adopted
through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or by a new interlocal
agreement. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies may be amended upon the
adoption of amendments by the Pierce County Council and ratification by 60 percent of
the jurisdictions in Pierce County (13 of 20) representing 75 percent of the total Pierce
County population as designated by the State Office of Financial Management at the time
of the proposed ratification.
C. Substantive policy amendments are based on a comprehensive review and update to the
Affordable Mousing Countywide Planning Policies by the Pierce County Regional.
Council.
D. The Pierce County Regional Council conducted discussions in open public meetings in
2007, 2008, and 2009, to address the amendments. The Pierce County Regional Council
subsequently recommended adoption of the proposed amendments on. May 21, 2009,
related to affordable housing.
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 1 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402 (D
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
20
27
28
PURPOSE:
This agreement is entered into by the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County for
the purpose of ratifying and approving the attached amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies (Attachment).
DURATION:
This agreement shall become effective upon execution by 60 percent of the jurisdictions in
Pierce County, representing 75 percent of the total Pierce County population as designated by the
State Office of Financial Management at the time of the proposed ratification. This agreement
will remain in effect until subsequently amended or repealed as provided by the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies.
SEVERABILITY:
If any of the provisions of this agreement are held illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
FILING:
A. copy of this agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of State, Washington Department of
Community, Trade and Economic Development, the Pierce County Auditor and each city and
town clerk.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by each member
jurisdiction as evidenced by the signature page affixed to this agreement.
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2049.113s Pierce County Council
Page 2 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S. Rm 1046
Tacoma, VITA 98402
2'
3'
4'
5
6'
7
8
i
9'
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
35
37
38
39
40
41
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENTS To THE PIERCE COUNTY
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
Signature Page
The legislative body of the undersigned jurisdiction has authorized execution of the
Interlocal Agreement, Amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
This agreement has been executed
Approved.-
l:
BY:
DATE:
Approved:
BY:
(Name of City/Town/County
(Mayor/Executive)
(Director/Manager/Chair of the Council)
Approved as to Form:
(City Attorney/Prosecutor)
(Pierce County Executive)
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2009--113s Pierce County Council
Page 3 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S. Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402
1 Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2009-113s
Z
3
4
5
6 FINDINGS of FACT
7
8 The Pierce County Council Finds that:
9
10 1. The Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) was created in 1992 by interlocal
11 agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County, and
12 charged with responsibilities, including: serving as a local fink to the Puget Sound
13 Regional Council, promoting intergovernmental cooperation, facilitating
14 compliance with the coordination and consistency requirements of the Growth
15 Management Act (Chapter 30.70A RCW) and the Regional Transportation
16 Planning organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing a consensus
17 among jurisdictions regarding the development and modification of the
18 Countywide Planning Policies.
19
20 2. On January 31, 1995, the Pierce County Council passed Resolution No. R95-17
21 affirming the commitment of the County to continue discussions with other local
22 jurisdictions to resolve implementation of the Growth: Management Act.
23
24 3. The Growth Management Act required Pierce County to adopt a county -wide
25 planning policy in cooperation with the cities and towns located within the
28 County.
27
28 4. The Countywide Planning Policies are to be used for establishing a county -wide
29 framework from which the comprehensive plans for Pierce County and the cities
30 and towns within Pierce County are developed and adopted.
31
32 5. On June 30, 1992, the Pierce County Council passed Ordinance No. 92-74
33 adopting the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies.
34
35 5. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies include provisions addressing
35 the "Need for Affordable Housing for all Economic segments of the Population
37 and Parameters for its Distribution.,,
38
39 7. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies include provisions addressing
44 procedures for amending the Countywide Planning Policies.
41
42 8. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies require amendments to the
43 Countywide Planning Policies to be adopted through an amendment of the
44 original Inter -Local Agreement or by a new inter -local agreement. The
45 amendment will become effective when sixty percent (60%) of the cities, towns
46 and County government representing seventy-five percent (75%) of the total
47 population as designated by the state office of Financial Management at the
48 time of the proposed ratification become signatories to the agreement.
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 1 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S. Rm 1046
Tacoma, WA 98402 (D
1 11 9. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies states the policies may be
2
initiated by the County, any city or town, or by the Pierce County Regional
3
Council.
4
5
10.
Median home prices in Pierce County, from 1999 through the second quarter of
6
2009, increased by over 09 percent or approximately $90,000, while median
7
annual family income rose by about 40 percent or less than $20,000 per year.
8
9
11.
The Pierce County Housing Affordability Task Force and the Pierce County
10
Housing and Community Development Consolidated Plan, using data provided
11
by HUD, have identified a shortage of approximately 30,000 units of affordable
12
housing for all economic segments of Pierce County's population.
1.3
14
12.
The Pierce County Regional Council, through Pierce County Planning and Land
15
Services, received a grant from the Washington state Department of Community,
16
Trade, and Economic Development to develop a countywide affordable housing
17
implementation plan.
18
19
13.
The Pierce County Regional Council, in November 2000, solicited proposals to
20
formulate a countywide affordable housing implementation plan and recommend
21
new countywide affordable housing policies.
22
23
14.
The Pierce County Regional Council sponsored a series of public workshops in
24
March 2007 soliciting input for the countywide affordable housing strategy.
25
26
15.
Recommendations for a countywide affordable housing strategy from the
27
consulting firm of PMC were published on June 15, 2007.
28
29
15.
The Growth Management Coordinating Committee reviewed the consultant's
36
recommendation and forwarded its recommended modifications to the Pierce
31
County Regional Council.
32
33
17.
The PCRC conducted negotiations in open public meetings during 2007, 2008,
34
and 2009 to address the proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing
35
section of the Countywide Planning Policies.
36
37
18.
The PCRC recommended adoption of proposed amendments to the Pierce
38
County Countywide Planning Policies on May 21, 2009.
39
40
19.
An environmental review of the proposed amendments to the Pierce County
41
Countywide Planning Policies was conducted pursuant to RC's 43.21 C and a
42
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on November 10, 2009.
43
44
20.
The Pierce County Planning Commission, at its September 22, 2009, regular
45
public hearing, reviewed the proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning
46
Policies and recommended approval.
47
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2009.113s Pierce County council
Page 2 of 3 934 Tacoma Ave S, Rm IG46
Tacoma, WA 98402 (D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
s
9
10
11
12
`.1. After a properly noticed public hearing, the Community development Committee
of the County Council considered oral and written testimony on the proposed
amendments and forwarded a do pass as substituted recommendation to the full
Council.
1_2. The county Council held a public hearing on February 16, 2010, to consider oral
and written testimony.
?3. The county Council found that it was in the public interest to authorize the Pierce
County Executive to execute the interlocal agreement.
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2009-113s Pierce County Council
Page 3 of 3 930 Tacoma �Av ma, S,R 104
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENTS TO THE PIERCE COUNTY
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
This agreement is entered into by and among the cities and towns of Pierce
County and Pierce county. This agreement is made pursuant to the provisions
of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter 39.34 RCW. This agreement
has been authorized by the legislative body of each jurisdiction pursuant to
formal action and evidenced by execution of the signature page of this
agreement.
BACKGROUND:
A. The Pierce county Regional council (PCRC) was created in 1992 by
interlocal agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and
Pierce County. The organization is charged with responsibilities,
including: serving as a local link to the Puget Sound Regional Council,
promoting intergovernmental cooperation, facilitating compliance with the
coordination and consistency requirements of the Growth Management
Act (Chapter 30.70A RQW) and the Regional Transportation Planning
Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing a consensus among
jurisdictions regarding the development and modification of the
Countywide Planning Policies.
B. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies provide for amendments
to be adopted through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or
by a new interlocal agreement. The Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies may be amended upon the adoption of amendments by the
Pierce County Council and ratification by 60 percent of the jurisdictions in
Pierce County (13 of 20) representing 75 percent of the total Pierce
County population as designated by the State Office of Financial
Management at the time of the proposed ratification.
C. Substantive policy amendments are based on a comprehensive review
and update to the Affordable Housing Countywide Planning Policies by the
Pierce County Regional Council.
D. The Pierce County Regional Council conducted discussions in open public
meetings in 2007, 2008, and 2009, to address the amendments. The
Pierce County Regional Council subsequently recommended adoption of
the proposed amendments on May 21, 2009, related to affordable
housing.
Page 1 of 3
PURPOSE:
This agreement is entered into by the cities and towns of Pierce County and
Pierce County for the purpose of ratifying and approving the attached
amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies (Attachment).
DURATION:
This agreement shall become effective upon execution by 60 percent of the
jurisdictions in Pierce county, representing 75 percent of the total Pierce County
population as designated by the State Office of Financial Management at the
time of the proposed ratification. This agreement will remain in effect until
subsequently amended or repealed as provided by the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies.
SEVERABILITY:
If any of the provisions of this agreement are held illegal, invalid or
unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
FILING:
A copy � of this agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of State, Washington
Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development, the Pierce
County Auditor and each city and town clerk.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by each
member !jurisdiction as evidenced by the signature page affixed to this
agreement.
Page 2of3
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENTS TO THE PIERCE COUNTY
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
Signature Page
The legislative body of the undersigned jurisdiction has authorized
execution of the Interlocal Agreement, Amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
This agreement has been executed City of Auburn
(Name of City/Town/County)
BY:
(Mayor/Executive)
DATE:
Attest:
AM
(City Clerk)
Approved to rm-
BY:
(City A ey/ rosecu r)
Approved:
By:
(Pierce County Executive)
Page 3of3