Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM III-A CTTY OF Memorandum * WASHINGTON To: Downtown Redevelopment Committee ° From: Elizabeth Ghamberlain, Planning Manager Ingrid Gaub, Assistant Gity Engineer Ryan Vondrak, Projecf Engineer Maija McKnight, Arts Coordinator Date: November 4, 2010 . Re: South Division Street Promenade - Gateway Feature Backqround At the October 26, 2010 Downtown Redevelopment Committee, staff and the consuttant, KPG, Inc. presented a gateway feature concept for the South Division Street Promenade project. This feature could also potentially be replicated at other gateway points into Downtown Aubum. The Committee provided the following direction to staff: e Bring back options that incorporate public art or that incorporates an afistic element but not a public art piece and the associated costs of each option. o Bring back the potentiaf budget available for the inclusion of public art in the project. Discussion Staff and the consultant met to,discuss the options and present a recommendation to the Downtown Redevelopment Committee. The options are outlined as follows: Options Estimaied Cost Project Accomplished Schedule Impact 1 Gateway designed by $100,000 Not a feasible option for Delay project design public artist; full , this project and project sfart date; integrated public art not really feasible for ' these circumstances 2 Banner Option - ,$30,OOU in'addition KPG, Inc. would Concurrent wifh each gateway would to the gateway cost incorporate into construction; No - be standard'¢ed for inclutled in the specfications that impact to timeline. the poles and arch project budget contractor responsible but would have a would have muit le for connectin /fasten the Rage 1 of 3 ° ' ` t1UBURN * MORE THAN YOU fMAG1NED unique design banners produced art pieces to the attached'to the poles and then used when gateway. The gateway, . other gateway structure would be arches are designed and constructed specfications developed by KPG (e.g. structural, The $30,000 could foundation, poles, be adjusted; this brackets, arch, lettering);, amount is based on Parameters such as 12 banners. wind load, weight would. be-given to artist to . design the banners/art piece. We could have KPG design both a spread footing and normal footing in their plans. This option provides a design for the gateway stcucture that would be easily reusable at ofher ' locations within downtown on future projects as the design would be done. Artisf Designed Part - Artist design fee = KPG, Inc: would design Design the lettering 10-15% of project the gateway structure and template budget for the and develop the Gity would need the background; this gateway + Design specifications (e.g. design parameters option would be Proposal Solicitation structural, foundation, -and information from replicated for each (3 artists x$1000 = poles, arch); artist would the aftt by the end gateway $3000) design the background ofiNoVember: There template and lettering #or Would be an impact Total estimate = "Downtown Aubum° and to schedule with this $10,500 in addition then tFiat design - option. to gateway costs „provided to contractor ($50,000 x 15% + for fabrication and $3,000) installation; thiswould , outlined in the ~ specifications. We could ` have KPG design both a spread footing and normal footing in their plans. This option provides a . desi n for the atewa Page 2 of 3 t1UBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED structure that would be easily reusable at other = locations within downtown on future projects as-the design would be done. 4 KPG, Inc. Designed No addfional cost We could have KPG In consuttation with Artistic Expression added; project design both a spread the Arts Commission budget line included footing and normal creafe a custom footing in their plans. gateway arch. This option provides a No impact to timeline. design for the gateway structure that would be easily reusable afi other locations within downtown on future projects: as the design would be done. , StaffRecommendation Since Option 1 is infeasible without delaying the project, Options 2-4 were evaluated and staff recommends: e An option that includes a public art element that would be part of the City's public art collection; Option 2 with KPG, Inc. designing a background plate and more artistic lettering for "Dowrrtown Aubum". • An option that includes an artistic element but would not be part of the City's public art collection, Staff recommends Option 4. Review by the Arts: Commission with a reoommendation to the Downtown Redevelopment Committee for action'would be part of any option. Page 3 of 3 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU TAAAGINED South Division Street Promenade Option 1: artist to Option 2: artist provided panel provide artwork for pole linework/lettering (fabricated panel by contractor) I I ~ -77 I I I , I I I I I I I e~ ~ ! .4-~ ~ _ - ~ ~ W rz: v . ~ ~ . 4 . I' Downtown Gateway Concept 11.04.2010 KPG